Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 09:26:45 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 09:26:45 PM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/candleman2justice2007.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 05, 2007, 09:45:06 PM
I thought you guys would never get here!! :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 05, 2007, 09:45:30 PM
:twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:10:50 PM
Posted by Msmarple in the previous thread:

This probably has been posted before, but I just got a little curious about the communications on Aruba.

http://www.setar.aw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=198&Itemid=150

Excerpts:

Background information on how SETAR has started as Telecommunications Company owned by the government to an incorporated company with an intensified focus on its customers.

<snip>
In 1986 Aruba obtained its `Status Aparte’ in the Dutch Kingdom. This meant that Aruba was to form part of the Dutch Kingdom with its own government. Aruba was then ready to start up its own Telecommunications Company. Before 1986, all international telecommunications had gone through Curaçao, which was primarily a service for telephone and telegraph at this point in time. On Aruba, the `Landsradio’ (International and Telegram Service) and `Telefoondienst’ (Local Telephone Service) were merged into SETAR (Servicio di Telecomunicacion di Aruba).

<snip>
In 2003 SETAR became an incorporated company (with the government as shareholder) ...

<snip>
In July 2004 the introduction of GPRS to Aruba became one of the latest happenings on the island. SETAR introduced the Waw! effect, which allowed customers to take photos and to send and receive pictures, It also gave them an extra option of publishing pictures in an electronic album in a blog form through Waw! blogging. This was an instant success and started a trend whereby everyone wanted to have a Waw! Phone.

In September 2004 SETAR bought the local television station of Telearuba Channel 13. This move required a large investment as the building needed a complete renovation and also modern digital equipment so that it could reopen as an ultra-modern state-of-the-art TV station. The new Telearuba officially opened in March 2005.

<snip>
In February 2005, SETAR acquired the local Cable TV company and with this, SETAR was able to further expand its telecommunications capabilities.

<snip>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 05, 2007, 10:11:24 PM
:D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 10:11:27 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I thought you guys would never get here!! :roll:


Don't ya hate it when no one will post on the last couple of pages cause they're afraid their post will get lost in the change over?  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 05, 2007, 10:12:22 PM
Quote from: "robots"
:twisted:


I think we gonna needa mo wax for this big one. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:12:54 PM
SPOCK - if you are still around.  Who exactly said that the phone records were lost?  Was it Bondia/Glenda, Scubajap, MIP6, Reality??  Who said they were lost?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:14:26 PM
MOBILE PHONE

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DeepakMobilePhone.jpg)


PHONE

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/phonecalltrafficcopy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 05, 2007, 10:16:17 PM
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=6894.msg223597;topicseen#new

Chapt 4 of Jorans Book the pimps..
- Freddy and a few of his friends called themselves "the pimpology crew". As a joke we used to call each other "pimp" when we were chatting up girls.
- on the island girls too make the first moves on guys or show how they feel about guys by bumping and grooving into them at clubs. Also giving shows by kissing other girls in front of you.

- the best way to make a girl trust you (and not think you are a local beach bum) is to tell them you are a tourist also. This way they do not think you are just trying to get them into the sack. The more often you try this "lie" the easier it gets to score from it. He would say however that he used to live on Aruba, that they still owned a place there and that this is the reason he knew all the good places to hang at


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 05, 2007, 10:17:15 PM
- on the island girls too make the first moves on guys or show how they feel about guys by bumping and grooving into them at clubs. Also giving shows by kissing other girls in front of you.


Sounds like GVC doesnt it??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:22:28 PM
page 3:

- I have always respected girls. I h ave net hit a girl or been with a girl who did not want me to be with her. If I would see a guy hit a girl, then I would smack/hit him. A girl is sacred to me, just like my mom and just like my girlfriend. And it someone would hurt them than I would not what I would do.

- with almost all my ex-girlfriends I still have a good friendship en during this entire police-investigation the police have questioned everybody I have ever been in contact with and most "went to bat for me/defended me".

- "if you really love you girl, you would not cheat" is what most people would say. I have truly loved a girl but that did not stop me from cheating. My friends would say that this proved I did not really love her. But I did, she meant  a lot to me. And one of the biggest life-lessons that I have had is that if I care a lot about someone, I have to stop doing certain things. I cannot have my cake and eat it too, I have to make choices.

- Why Joran would still need a girl on the side if he already was going steady/had a girlfriend? For his friends is Joran's answer, to act tough. "Joran can get with any girl" is what they would say then. I used to think that was "dope", now I know better. It was very immature behavior.

- that I have been with so many girls means nothing. I didn't appreciate it at the time ; I even sometimes regret it. In the end I only wanted a girl that was mine alone and that I truly loved.

- Joran started being sexually active young, at aged 14. On Aruba the age on which people start doing it is lower according to Joran then in other countries. His parents did not have an issue with a girl staying over. I did not talk to my dad however about the fact that I was already sexually active.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:23:48 PM
******* - I'm copying it and putting in the Important Case Document forum as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 05, 2007, 10:24:49 PM
2 OT replies to last thread:


Angie:  
Quote
Evening Tidy.. Im behind.. trying to get a few things done aroud the house.. Great to see you!!!
 Thanks Angie.  It's nice to be back for awhile.


Tylergal:  
Quote
Hi, Tidy. I was asking about you just the other day. You have been missed. Your kitty looks so cozy. Have you been on holiday?
 Hi Tyler!  Thanks--it's nice to "see" you.  I haven't been on holiday, just a sortof sabbatical! lol!  Had to check in to see what's going on in monkeyland with the news from the island last week.  I watched Greta for the first time in months, yuck!  But it was worth it if there was news of a reopened investigation!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 05, 2007, 10:25:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SPOCK - if you are still around.  Who exactly said that the phone records were lost?  Was it Bondia/Glenda, Scubajap, MIP6, Reality??  Who said they were lost?

LOL, no the statement wasn't from one of them. It was from someone who had tried to obtain the records in an official capacity. As I recall, the landline records were said to be missing. If I can find the thread, I will bring it over here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 05, 2007, 10:26:01 PM
LOL This book is sickening..Even worse than I thought it would be..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:27:10 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
SPOCK - if you are still around.  Who exactly said that the phone records were lost?  Was it Bondia/Glenda, Scubajap, MIP6, Reality??  Who said they were lost?

LOL, no the statement wasn't from one of them. It was from someone who had tried to obtain the records in an official capacity. As I recall, the landline records were said to be missing. If I can find the thread, I will bring it over here.

Thanks Spock.  You understand how skeptical I am of certain sources in Aruba, LOL  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 05, 2007, 10:29:25 PM
Night folks

 Hugs t Nemo to


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:29:42 PM
Nite Angie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 05, 2007, 10:30:10 PM
Reference to the missing phone records with possible explaination from poster IWABWU  at BFN. Interesting.........

++++++++++++++


Good to find such discussion!  Who would have server access?  Where are the records managed?  A customer service person?  Complex billing arrangements are made for many kinds of businesses.  Complex billing arrangements are required today.  All connected by links.  JMHO

Here are some of my thoughts.  Many old applications/programs, some 20+ years old are still in service today.  Simply put, old mainframe programs, running on newer hardware.  Why?  Because the old home grown applications were well written and there is nothing off the shelf that would work as well.  JMHO

Could be a small program, could be a larger program.  In today's world, it would not be unknown to slap a new 'web' based 'front end' on something.  Looks modern, but behind the scenes, it's still the old mainframe app., with perhaps a few enhancements.  Only the old school programmer knows for sure.  MO

Where does this happen?  In larger companies, think those that may have bought and sold pieces, over a period of years or perhaps smaller companies that did not modernize.  Why?  The larger companies may not have the desire to integrate the bits and pieces, perhaps there is no long term view.  The old keeps chugging along.  Newer companies, companies that have grown, or that are forward looking, may be modern and up to date with their systems.  Used Y2K as a reason to modernize and purchase integrated software.  MO

Why does it matter?  In older systems there may be security, passwords, etc. to access.  However, there may not be a good record keeping of who and when changes were made.  MO

Perhaps there is a table of what is current, with no record of what was yesterday, or last month.

Perhaps there is a monthly record of "what is" at month end, but with no idea who or when changes were made.  One would need to compare the month end differences to determine 'if' a change was made.  

Perhaps there is a monthly record that shows who may have made a change, but not if and what changes were made.  Think of the times you are asked to confirm something on the computer - answer either "Y/N" - even if you have made no change, but just hit enter.  Would that transaction be recorded?  Would someone know who, when, and what, if anything was changed?

Some old applications recorded not only who (user id), but when, and what was changed.  Newer systems, the law, and big companies require better record keeping of changes.  Older systems kept track of changes by limiting access to tables, perhaps not recording what, who, and why.  MO

But, one would have to know what the application was.  It is strange that the records were lost.  I have to wonder "How?"  What does 'lost' mean exactly?  What kind of system was/is being used?  How hard / easy would it be to 'lose' something?  Or, does 'lose' mean we can't explain the who, what, and when of the loss?  

Who manages the phone service in Aruba?  What kind of software/systems are in use?  Is it old with a newer front end?  Or, something new and modern?  Younger people do not learn 20+ year old languages.  It's often left to a dying group of individuals.  JMHO

In older systems, changes may become lost with time and hard to trace.  Files overwritten, storage space overwritten.  The longer the time that passes, the harder it is to reconstruct.  JMHO

Just my thoughts.  The phone records have always been interesting to me.  Does that make sense to you?  Can you see how records could be changed?  Would a customer service person printing off a list of calls really know the links behind the bill they are printing?  JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 05, 2007, 10:31:11 PM
Quote from: "*******"
LOL This book is sickening..Even worse than I thought it would be..


Hi all!

Yeah, it reads about like one of those "what I did on my summer vacation" essays we all had to write in high school...

and I agree with Klaas... the more people in Holland that buy it, the more will say he is guilty so if they want to waste their "gilders" on it... then that's great.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 10:39:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
page 3:

- I have always respected girls. I h ave net hit a girl or been with a girl who did not want me to be with her. If I would see a guy hit a girl, then I would smack/hit him. A girl is sacred to me, just like my mom and just like my girlfriend. And it someone would hurt them than I would not what I would do.

- with almost all my ex-girlfriends I still have a good friendship en during this entire police-investigation the police have questioned everybody I have ever been in contact with and most "went to bat for me/defended me".

- "if you really love you girl, you would not cheat" is what most people would say. I have truly loved a girl but that did not stop me from cheating. My friends would say that this proved I did not really love her. But I did, she meant  a lot to me. And one of the biggest life-lessons that I have had is that if I care a lot about someone, I have to stop doing certain things. I cannot have my cake and eat it too, I have to make choices.

- Why Joran would still need a girl on the side if he already was going steady/had a girlfriend? For his friends is Joran's answer, to act tough. "Joran can get with any girl" is what they would say then. I used to think that was "dope", now I know better. It was very immature behavior.

- that I have been with so many girls means nothing. I didn't appreciate it at the time ; I even sometimes regret it. In the end I only wanted a girl that was mine alone and that I truly loved.

- Joran started being sexually active young, at aged 14. On Aruba the age on which people start doing it is lower according to Joran then in other countries. His parents did not have an issue with a girl staying over. I did not talk to my dad however about the fact that I was already sexually active.


I think that pretty much says it all about their parenting style.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 05, 2007, 10:41:40 PM
Lurking and working at home.
When Robots said he needed to shave his legs, I thought of steel wool
furry leggies. I think a buffer would take care of that. Shine it up. Candy Apple Red paint ?
Nothing new from what I can see.
Was at the old roller rink today with the little kiddo, she had to go to a roller skating birthday party. Maybe it's coming back into style ? Kids were falling, squealing, laffing, eating, holding hands so no one would fall down. You could bring your own roller blades or rent the old fashioned boot skates.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 05, 2007, 10:42:11 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
page 3:

- I have always respected girls. I h ave net hit a girl or been with a girl who did not want me to be with her. If I would see a guy hit a girl, then I would smack/hit him. A girl is sacred to me, just like my mom and just like my girlfriend. And it someone would hurt them than I would not what I would do.

- with almost all my ex-girlfriends I still have a good friendship en during this entire police-investigation the police have questioned everybody I have ever been in contact with and most "went to bat for me/defended me".

- "if you really love you girl, you would not cheat" is what most people would say. I have truly loved a girl but that did not stop me from cheating. My friends would say that this proved I did not really love her. But I did, she meant  a lot to me. And one of the biggest life-lessons that I have had is that if I care a lot about someone, I have to stop doing certain things. I cannot have my cake and eat it too, I have to make choices.

- Why Joran would still need a girl on the side if he already was going steady/had a girlfriend? For his friends is Joran's answer, to act tough. "Joran can get with any girl" is what they would say then. I used to think that was "dope", now I know better. It was very immature behavior.

- that I have been with so many girls means nothing. I didn't appreciate it at the time ; I even sometimes regret it. In the end I only wanted a girl that was mine alone and that I truly loved.

- Joran started being sexually active young, at aged 14. On Aruba the age on which people start doing it is lower according to Joran then in other countries. His parents did not have an issue with a girl staying over. I did not talk to my dad however about the fact that I was already sexually active.


I think that pretty much says it all about their parenting style.  :roll:


Yes, his respect for others and himself is quite obvious.  This is someone who kills animals, cheats on his girlfriend, abuses his mother when she visits him at prison, kicks his brothers -- yeah, he's a real wiener.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 10:44:33 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Lurking and working at home.
When Robots said he needed to shave his legs, I thought of steel wool
furry leggies. I think a buffer would take care of that. Shine it up. Candy Apple Red paint ?
Nothing new from what I can see.
Was at the old roller rink today with the little kiddo, she had to go to a roller skating birthday party. Maybe it's coming back into style ? Kids were falling, squealing, laffing, eating, holding hands so no one would fall down. You could bring your own roller blades or rent the old fashioned boot skates.


LOL at the buffer.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 05, 2007, 10:46:21 PM
I was thinking of the tools you use when you are doing a gas tank for a bike. Candy Apple RED was always a nice color.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 10:49:27 PM
The rest of Chapter 4 translated by Ramm at BFN and also copied in our Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

page 4 (and a bit part 5 as it is the last page of this chapter):

- Joran's parents did suspect something and often remarked on it but at those occasions Joran tried to change the subject ASAP. His parents were among others preaching "if you do it, at least do it safely", that was a message they felt strongly about. And I always practiced that. If buddies needed protection, they could always come to me because they knew I always carried a condom in my wallet, just in case.

- it is always up to the girl how far we go and how quickly. Sometimes I meet a girl that I hang around with all vacation, some just for a night. Sometimes a girl just want to go see a movie together. If she is really nice then that too is no problem. Anything was possible, it was soo easy to let it all hang out on the island. Girls occupied a lot of my time.

- On Aruba girls give it up (sex) much more easily. The weather is nice, everybody is a lot nicer. If it gets hot here (weather) than the hormones also start acting up. There are girls here who are just here for the sex, nothing more and nothing less. They are not stupid. I don't have the illusion that they were all smitten/infatuated with me.

- On Aruba you must also expect that your girlfriend might be getting it on with someone else too. It is a small island. You all go to the same schools, know the same crowd, go to the same clubs to go out and pick up girls. You have to be really good in order to be a player. Joran personally knows a few guys who have 2 or 3 phones for that reason. Joran only had 1 and that was private. I did not like it when girls were looking in my phone who I had been phoning/text messaging with. "If you would trust me, you would not check up on my through my phone" is what Joran would say to them. But he did not deserve that trust because he was no angel.

- sometimes we would rent a hotel room. I happened that three guys were in the same room having sex with girls. I was given a blow job on a balcony once by an American girl while Deepak was in the bathroom with a girl and Freddy was in the room proper with a girl too. But we did never share a girl or did threesomes. That was going way too far for me. We did however make topless pictures of a girl in a hotel room once.

- I don't really enjoy telling you about all these things. I think my private life is my own business. But I have no choice and have to tell these things because I want to be honest. Everyone I know has been questioned and every secret I have ever had has come out. Because I am a so-called "public figure" people can say anything they want about me, so I no longer have a private life.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 10:54:57 PM
That is truly disgusting. He says he doesn't have any choice except to tell all in his book, but I don't think that's the reason at all. I think he believes that his readers will be impressed by his juvenile bragging about sexual exploits.  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 05, 2007, 10:56:55 PM
Love this quote: "You have to be really good in order to be a player."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:00:02 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Love this quote: "You have to be really good in order to be a player."
Hi Monkeys!!...........yes, BB, isn't that a good one. I like this line too -But he did not deserve that trust because he was no angel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 05, 2007, 11:01:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The rest of Chapter 4 translated by Ramm at BFN and also copied in our Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

page 4 (and a bit part 5 as it is the last page of this chapter):

(edited)
- sometimes we would rent a hotel room. I happened that three guys were in the same room having sex with girls. I was given a _______ on a balcony once by an American girl while Deepak was in the bathroom with a girl and Freddy was in the room proper with a girl too. But we did never share a girl or did threesomes. That was going way too far for me. We did however make topless pictures of a girl in a hotel room once.


But Joran and Deepak weren't really close friends, remember? He didn't know Joran THAT well, they were not real close. Deepak only drove Joran around and Joran was only taking advantage of him.

Joran slipped up again. ALL liars eventually lose a detail or two and give themselves away.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 05, 2007, 11:03:52 PM
Shallow. Self serving book. We read about most of this stuff already.
Also boring.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 05, 2007, 11:03:52 PM
Heading out early tonight... y'all take care and I will be back in tomorrow...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 05, 2007, 11:04:28 PM
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 11:05:38 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Heading out early tonight... y'all take care and I will be back in tomorrow...


Night SB. Sleep well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 11:06:18 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Howdy, Snoop. Ain't he a real charmer?  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 05, 2007, 11:06:49 PM
Nite Monkeys, early day tomorrow


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:06:54 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "klaasend"
The rest of Chapter 4 translated by Ramm at BFN and also copied in our Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

page 4 (and a bit part 5 as it is the last page of this chapter):

(edited)
- sometimes we would rent a hotel room. I happened that three guys were in the same room having sex with girls. I was given a _______ on a balcony once by an American girl while Deepak was in the bathroom with a girl and Freddy was in the room proper with a girl too. But we did never share a girl or did threesomes. That was going way too far for me. We did however make topless pictures of a girl in a hotel room once.


But Joran and Deepak weren't really close friends, remember? He didn't know Joran THAT well, they were not real close. Deepak only drove Joran around and Joran was only taking advantage of him.

Joran slipped up again. ALL liars eventually lose a detail or two and give themselves away.
I wonder how pissed off Deepak is by now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 05, 2007, 11:09:32 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Howdy, Snoop. Ain't he a real charmer?  :roll:


Hi ya BT!!   He's a freak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 05, 2007, 11:10:05 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Heading out early tonight... y'all take care and I will be back in tomorrow...


Goodnight sb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 05, 2007, 11:10:32 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Nite Monkeys, early day tomorrow


nighty  night bb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:11:30 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Shallow. Self serving book. We read about most of this stuff already.
Also boring.
He wrote this book for therapy, oh, and to make $$$


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:13:34 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Howdy, Snoop. Ain't he a real charmer?  :roll:
I hope he doesn't think that he is a public figure in a "good way"...Howdy BT and Snoopy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 05, 2007, 11:13:40 PM
"American girls are the loosest / wildest of the lot"

No Fair! Glenda/Renfro obviously skews this result.

You can only count her once! Not how many times... :smt030


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 11:16:06 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Nite Monkeys, early day tomorrow


Night BB. Sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:16:39 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
"American girls are the loosest / wildest of the lot"

No Fair! Glenda/Renfro obviously skews this result.

You can only count her once! Not how many times... :smt030
Renho even went as far already to say that when American girls go to Aruba, it is up to them to prove that they are not loose


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 11:16:51 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Howdy, Snoop. Ain't he a real charmer?  :roll:
I hope he doesn't think that he is a public figure in a "good way"...Howdy BT and Snoopy


Hi, Elaine. It's enough to make a person gag, isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:19:21 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Howdy, Snoop. Ain't he a real charmer?  :roll:
I hope he doesn't think that he is a public figure in a "good way"...Howdy BT and Snoopy


Hi, Elaine. It's enough to make a person gag, isn't it?
It sure is, we will need klaas to get out the barf bags soon, the ones with his picture on it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 05, 2007, 11:20:46 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi Everybody!!

He really thinks he's something special doesn't he?    What a freak!
He ain't nothing more than a kidnapping raping murderer. Nothing.  Yea bet  mommy and daddy are real proud of that.  Sick Freak.  Even considers himself a "public figure".  I hate them all.  :roll:


Howdy, Snoop. Ain't he a real charmer?  :roll:
I hope he doesn't think that he is a public figure in a "good way"...Howdy BT and Snoopy


Hi, Elaine. It's enough to make a person gag, isn't it?
It sure is, we will need klaas to get out the barf bags soon, the ones with his picture on it.


I think we've used up a lot of those bags lately.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 05, 2007, 11:21:22 PM
Pecking order in Aruba..

1. Dutch born in The Netherlands
2. Dutch born on Aruba
3. "Arubans" born on Aruba
4. Those born to "Aruban" parents elsewhere
.... then way, way, way down the list... to the point they DO NOT MATTER....
5. Tourists


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:22:52 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Pecking order in Aruba..

1. Dutch born in The Netherlands
2. Dutch born on Aruba
3. "Arubans" born on Aruba
4. Those born to "Aruban" parents elsewhere
.... then way, way, way down the list... to the point they DO NOT MATTER....
5. Tourists
Great post!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:31:19 PM
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 05, 2007, 11:37:01 PM
This Motion was a request to compel to the Kalpos.  The list of documents, is their response.
There very well could be a statement from Val and phone records in Joran's documents (and not privy to Kalpos).
The 171 pages is not everything IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 05, 2007, 11:39:23 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


He had to tell us about the pimps..That was the lifestyle they lived everyday. He woulda had to stop at age 14 if he left that out. Makes me ill hearing about his conquests..No doubt the parents helped create a monster.Sounds like they hung out at Jorans most of the time as well..You know damn well they were there that night with Anita gone..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 11:42:27 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
This Motion was a request to compel to the Kalpos.  The list of documents, is their response.
There very well could be a statement from Val and phone records in Joran's documents (and not privy to Kalpos).
The 171 pages is not everything IMO.

I'm not so sure about that.  I would bet that the Dr. Phil people were given access to the list of available documents.  Now there could be some statments that KJ didn't release to the suspects so nobody but the prosecutors office has them.  The list in the Motion to Compel is the list of documents that the Dr. Phil people requested and the Kalpoes do not want to produce.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:42:45 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
This Motion was a request to compel to the Kalpos.  The list of documents, is their response.
There very well could be a statement from Val and phone records in Joran's documents (and not privy to Kalpos).
The 171 pages is not everything IMO.
I agree and believe there is a lot more. IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 05, 2007, 11:44:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The rest of Chapter 4 translated by Ramm at BFN and also copied in our Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

page 4 (and a bit part 5 as it is the last page of this chapter):

- Joran's parents did suspect something and often remarked on it but at those occasions Joran tried to change the subject ASAP. His parents were among others preaching "if you do it, at least do it safely", that was a message they felt strongly about. And I always practiced that. If buddies needed protection, they could always come to me because they knew I always carried a condom in my wallet, just in case.

- it is always up to the girl how far we go and how quickly. Sometimes I meet a girl that I hang around with all vacation, some just for a night. Sometimes a girl just want to go see a movie together. If she is really nice then that too is no problem. Anything was possible, it was soo easy to let it all hang out on the island. Girls occupied a lot of my time.

- On Aruba girls give it up (sex) much more easily. The weather is nice, everybody is a lot nicer. If it gets hot here (weather) than the hormones also start acting up. There are girls here who are just here for the sex, nothing more and nothing less. They are not stupid. I don't have the illusion that they were all smitten/infatuated with me.

- On Aruba you must also expect that your girlfriend might be getting it on with someone else too. It is a small island. You all go to the same schools, know the same crowd, go to the same clubs to go out and pick up girls. You have to be really good in order to be a player. Joran personally knows a few guys who have 2 or 3 phones for that reason. Joran only had 1 and that was private. I did not like it when girls were looking in my phone who I had been phoning/text messaging with. "If you would trust me, you would not check up on my through my phone" is what Joran would say to them. But he did not deserve that trust because he was no angel.

- sometimes we would rent a hotel room. I happened that three guys were in the same room having sex with girls. I was given a blow job on a balcony once by an American girl while Deepak was in the bathroom with a girl and Freddy was in the room proper with a girl too. But we did never share a girl or did threesomes. That was going way too far for me. We did however make topless pictures of a girl in a hotel room once.

- I don't really enjoy telling you about all these things. I think my private life is my own business. But I have no choice and have to tell these things because I want to be honest. Everyone I know has been questioned and every secret I have ever had has come out. Because I am a so-called "public figure" people can say anything they want about me, so I no longer have a private life.


What an upstanding young man.  Just the kind of guy you want to take you to the debutante formal. :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:44:49 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
This Motion was a request to compel to the Kalpos.  The list of documents, is their response.
There very well could be a statement from Val and phone records in Joran's documents (and not privy to Kalpos).
The 171 pages is not everything IMO.
I agree and believe there is a lot more. IMO
ooops, didn't see klaas's response above as was typing at the same time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 05, 2007, 11:47:26 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


He had to tell us about the pimps..That was the lifestyle they lived everyday. He woulda had to stop at age 14 if he left that out. Makes me ill hearing about his conquests..No doubt the parents helped create a monster.Sounds like they hung out at Jorans most of the time as well..You know damn well they were there that night with Anita gone..


I would venture to say that of the parents, one was living vicariously through Deepak and one was reliving her glory days as the go-to-girl.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 05, 2007, 11:48:10 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


He had to tell us about the pimps..That was the lifestyle they lived everyday. He woulda had to stop at age 14 if he left that out. Makes me ill hearing about his conquests..No doubt the parents helped create a monster.Sounds like they hung out at Jorans most of the time as well..You know damn well they were there that night with Anita gone..


I would venture to say that of the parents, one was living vicariously through joran and one was reliving her glory days as the go-to-girl.  Let me correct that.  I have got Deepak on the brain seeing as Joran says he never had sex with a girl and now he is saying he was in another room having sex with someone.  I just wonder if that someone was Guido.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 05, 2007, 11:49:33 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
"American girls are the loosest / wildest of the lot"

No Fair! Glenda/Renfro obviously skews this result.

You can only count her once! Not how many times... :smt030


I was a 21year old 3 decades ago give or take...went to CA on a vacation with 5 other young women after graduation.  When in Yosemite, a tour guide told us blatantly that we looked like hussies (sp?)...because we had worn halter tops, hot pants & nail polish....we were so bewildered, insulted and embarrassed....we were just wearing what the east had as current for that time...hussy was the farthest from our minds and not on our agenda....the stereotype didn't fit then and it doesn't fit now...imo....the American girls reference just brought that memory back....it wasn't nice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:50:50 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


He had to tell us about the pimps..That was the lifestyle they lived everyday. He woulda had to stop at age 14 if he left that out. Makes me ill hearing about his conquests..No doubt the parents helped create a monster.Sounds like they hung out at Jorans most of the time as well..You know damn well they were there that night with Anita gone..


I would venture to say that of the parents, one was living vicariously through joran and one was reliving her glory days as the go-to-girl.  Let me correct that.  I have got Deepak on the brain seeing as Joran says he never had sex with a girl and now he is saying he was in another room having sex with someone.  I just wonder if that someone was Guido.
ROFLMAO :smt044


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 05, 2007, 11:53:22 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


He had to tell us about the pimps..That was the lifestyle they lived everyday. He woulda had to stop at age 14 if he left that out. Makes me ill hearing about his conquests..No doubt the parents helped create a monster.Sounds like they hung out at Jorans most of the time as well..You know damn well they were there that night with Anita gone..


I would venture to say that of the parents, one was living vicariously through joran and one was reliving her glory days as the go-to-girl.  Let me correct that.  I have got Deepak on the brain seeing as Joran says he never had sex with a girl and now he is saying he was in another room having sex with someone.  I just wonder if that someone was Guido.


Thats a sick thought..lol.. I always wondered since joran had a black eye and guido scratches if they were doing something with NH that night when she woke up. I can only imagine her fear when she awoke..And I do beleave she did..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 05, 2007, 11:53:44 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "igsigs"
"American girls are the loosest / wildest of the lot"

No Fair! Glenda/Renfro obviously skews this result.

You can only count her once! Not how many times... :smt030


I was a 21year old 3 decades ago give or take...went to CA on a vacation with 5 other young women after graduation.  When in Yosemite, a tour guide told us blatantly that we looked like hussies (sp?)...because we had worn halter tops, hot pants & nail polish....we were so bewildered, insulted and embarrassed....we were just wearing what the east had as current for that time...hussy was the farthest from our minds and not on our agenda....the stereotype didn't fit then and it doesn't fit now...imo....the American girls reference just brought that memory back....it wasn't nice.
It isn't nice! Renho has dubbed all American girls as "easy"...that is why I don't feel sorry for the woman when I hear people talk bad of her. She opened herself up for whatever she gets. JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 05, 2007, 11:57:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
This Motion was a request to compel to the Kalpos.  The list of documents, is their response.
There very well could be a statement from Val and phone records in Joran's documents (and not privy to Kalpos).
The 171 pages is not everything IMO.

I'm not so sure about that.  I would bet that the Dr. Phil people were given access to the list of available documents.  Now there could be some statments that KJ didn't release to the suspects so nobody but the prosecutors office has them.  The list in the Motion to Compel is the list of documents that the Dr. Phil people requested and the Kalpoes do not want to produce.


I didn't think that Dr. Phil generated this list.  When K2 didn't respond, Dr. Phil requested specifics.  In response to those requests, the K2 list the names of "priveleged" documents in their possession and reference the Phil request number.  I could be wrong on this.  I thought the list came from Kalpos in response to Dr. Phil.  I didn't read it as Phil generating the list.  hmmmm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 05, 2007, 11:57:13 PM
Have we heard anything from our Monkeys in the areas of the tornadoes?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 05, 2007, 11:58:50 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Have we heard anything from our Monkeys in the areas of the tornadoes?

I know Carnut lives in Kansas but he's always welcomed "weather" :wink:  I hope he's OK.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 12:00:42 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Have we heard anything from our Monkeys in the areas of the tornadoes?
Hi IBE! I read where they said Carnut lives in that area. I do not know who else does? But, I hope all are ok and safe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 12:03:51 AM
Yeh, and Joran doesn't do threesomes....except perhaps that time with the girl under the blanket, in front of his friends, with the "liquid" that  made her lips tingle, when he asked her to also screw the guy also ...ooops forgot that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 12:07:04 AM
And I don't believe Freddy only speaks papi...his brother is Ernesto and he works at Champions (the tourist bar)...no English???  pleeeease...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 12:10:12 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
And I don't believe Freddy only speaks papi...his brother is Ernesto and he works at Champions (the tourist bar)...no English???  pleeeease...
I would bet money he speaks English (when he wants to)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 12:22:33 AM
Goodnight monkeys!!  (unless I cannot sleep) :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 06, 2007, 12:29:07 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "IBE"
Have we heard anything from our Monkeys in the areas of the tornadoes?

I know Carnut lives in Kansas but he's always welcomed "weather" :wink:  I hope he's OK.


Not sure if that twister was near Wichita...think that's where Carnut parks his veehickles.....hope he's okay, too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 06, 2007, 12:30:00 AM
Narcistic...look it up..
He has no feelings for other people. He has " feelings " for girls, but that is just lust and hormones. Something very odd in his makeup. And it was there for a long time. Only remorse he has is when he gets caught.
Think he also likes the attention he gets, he is the centre of the universe, the rest of the world are his planets. Maybe that is why we don't understand him, because we are human.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 06, 2007, 12:33:56 AM
Wichita, KS is where a ref. is on carnut.com. I even went through some of the links trying to find an email. I have made up a bunch of email addys and hope he gets one. I hope he, his family and all our Monkeys are safe!

Just will have to wait until he and the other Monkeys in KS, Okla check in!

Hate waiting. OT Think I am going to try to save money and take the Apple training. I'd like to become a Apple tech of laptops. Fix them up by buying parts on eBay and then giving them to youth who could use them for word processing, homework, good Internet research. So how's that for a new "career" in the mid-60's?

Am getting "non-delivered" messages back on my emails. Will have to think of more combos.

I wish all the Monkeys good health, happiness and safety.  Good night Elaine!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Pita on May 06, 2007, 12:34:52 AM
SETAR  
 
Business address SEROE BLANCO Z/N, ORANJESTAD OOST  
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY  
Name of the company  SERVICIO DI TELECOMUNICACION DI ARUBA (SETAR) N.V.  
Statutory seat  ARUBA  
Date of incorporation  24 JANUARY 2003  
     
Authorized capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 225,000,000.00  
Issued capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 174,765,000.00  
Paid up capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 174,765,000.00  
Fiscal year  01 JANUARY thru 31 DECEMBER  
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD:  
 
CROES, ZENOVIO ROLAND;  
Residing in  KAS ARIBA 31-A, SANTA CRUZ, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 29 OCTOBER 1961  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR  
Effective  24 JANUARY 2003  
Authority  RESTRICTED  
   
NICOLAAS, ALFREDO ANTONIUS;  
Residing in  TANKI LEENDERT 95-B, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, SITTARD on 4 JANUARY 1964  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  PROXY  
Effective  26 AUGUST 2003  
Authority  RESTRICTED  
   
CROES, RICARDO RICHARD;  
Residing in  MON POS 2-A, SANTA CRUZ, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 3 APRIL 1960  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  PROXY  
Effective  26 AUGUST 2003  
Authority  RESTRICTED  
   
KELKBOOM, JOAQUIN JOHAN MARTINUS;  
Residing in  ROOI AFO 28, PARADERA, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 30 APRIL 1953  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  PROXY  
Effective  26 AUGUST 2003  
Authority  RESTRICTED  
   
PONSON, RAUL RODOLFO JOSE;  
Residing in  JABURIBARI 32-A, PARADERA, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 22 DECEMBER 1967  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  PROXY  
Effective  5 JULY 2004  
Authority  RESTRICTED  
   
RICHARDSON, HERMAND LEONARD;  
Residing in  KUDAWECHA 10, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 9 APRIL 1948  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  CHAIRMAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS  
Effective  14 DECEMBER 2006  
   
ODUBER, JOSEPH DANIEL VALENTINE;  
Residing in  CAYA MESA BISTA 29, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 28 JUNE 1938  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER  
Effective  14 DECEMBER 2006  
   
BIJEN, HENDRIKUS JOHANNES MARIA;  
Residing in  HERMAN GORTERSTRAAT 5, ORANJESTAD, ARUBA  
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, HENGELO on 22 OCTOBER 1946  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER  
Effective  14 DECEMBER 2006  
   
CROES, ARONDINO RIGOBERTUS BERTINO;  
Residing in  PAVILLAPARK 72, PARADERA, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 5 SEPTEMBER 1964  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER  
Effective  14 DECEMBER 2006  
   
JANSEN, DARCY JANE;  
Residing in  PAVILLA 26-B, PARADERA, ARUBA  
Born in  ARUBA on 4 MAY 1970  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  SUPERVISORY DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER  
Effective  14 DECEMBER 2006


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 06, 2007, 12:35:54 AM
Night all. Want to try to sleep so can get up early and check if everyone is OK here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 12:42:39 AM
Nite IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 12:52:20 AM
hi guys!

I'm never going to catch up, but I'm really impressed with the work that I have seen in here! You guys are impressive!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 12:54:44 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


He had to tell us about the pimps..That was the lifestyle they lived everyday. He woulda had to stop at age 14 if he left that out. Makes me ill hearing about his conquests..No doubt the parents helped create a monster.Sounds like they hung out at Jorans most of the time as well..You know damn well they were there that night with Anita gone..


I would venture to say that of the parents, one was living vicariously through joran and one was reliving her glory days as the go-to-girl.  Let me correct that.  I have got Deepak on the brain seeing as Joran says he never had sex with a girl and now he is saying he was in another room having sex with someone.  I just wonder if that someone was Guido.



Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 10, 2005


To you question as to why Deepak and Satish don't pick up girls with their nice car, I answer you that I do not know why. You have to ask them. I have never seen Deepak or Satish in the company of a girl. I have never seen Deepak dance but I once saw Satish dance with "Carmen JACCOPUCHI".


Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 10, 2005


To your question was to what exactly happens when we have picked up the girls, I can state the following. Just kissing and dancing.

To your question whether sexual intercourse has happened, I can state the following. Yes, it has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that all of us, so in one room, had sexual intercourse, I can state the following. It has happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 12:56:34 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The rest of Chapter 4 translated by Ramm at BFN and also copied in our Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

page 4 (and a bit part 5 as it is the last page of this chapter):

- On Aruba girls give it up (sex) much more easily. The weather is nice, everybody is a lot nicer. If it gets hot here (weather) than the hormones also start acting up. There are girls here who are just here for the sex, nothing more and nothing less. They are not stupid. I don't have the illusion that they were all smitten/infatuated with me.

- On Aruba you must also expect that your girlfriend might be getting it on with someone else too. It is a small island. You all go to the same schools, know the same crowd, go to the same clubs to go out and pick up girls. You have to be really good in order to be a player. Joran personally knows a few guys who have 2 or 3 phones for that reason. Joran only had 1 and that was private. I did not like it when girls were looking in my phone who I had been phoning/text messaging with. "If you would trust me, you would not check up on my through my phone" is what Joran would say to them. But he did not deserve that trust because he was no angel.



Isn't that great how he talks about the Aruban girls.  I hope everyone is reading  what he says about them.

I wonder if Julia Renfro is reading this.  Isn't she the one who made the comment about the MB kids.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:04:20 AM
PITA - thanks for the Setar info.  Setar is the land lines as well right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:06:04 AM
Yep, Joran is quite the sweetheart.  If he were my son I'd be mortified.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tcumom on May 06, 2007, 01:11:28 AM
Klaas ~ email ~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 01:14:02 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, Joran is quite the sweetheart.  If he were my son I'd be mortified.

If he were my son he wouldn't be living.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:15:22 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, Joran is quite the sweetheart.  If he were my son I'd be mortified.

If he were my son he wouldn't be living.


That too  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 01:16:12 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, Joran is quite the sweetheart.  If he were my son I'd be mortified.


If he had been mine...at the age of 14, he would have been sent to an all boys Jesuit boarding school.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 01:17:25 AM
Well Monkeys ... I am very sad.  Tonight I was in line at Walmart  ... buying a super soaker (water gun) for our grandson's 4th birthday tomorrow when I picked up the National Enquirer.  I feel justified reading  these magazines when I am forced to wait in a lineup to spend hard earned money.  Anyways ... within the pages was the article discussed earlier today on the forum regarding Beth Twitty and John Ramsey.  I hope with all my heart it is not true.  I have had faith that Jug and Beth would reconcile.  Those two have gone through so much in the past two years ... the stress on their relationship must have been overwhelming.  Nevertheless ... I was praying that after a period of time apart ...

Janet


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/01/05/sad-news-from-mountain-brook-al-jug-and-beth-twitty-divorcing/

168. I HAVE READ ALL THE COMMENTS AND APPRECIATE ALL THE SUPPORT. REGARDLESS OF WHAT PEOPLE MAY THINK I STILL LOVE BETH, MATT AND NATALEE. I WILL ALWAYS BE THERE FOR THEM. I PRAY FOR CLOSURE EVERY NIGHT SO BETH CAN REST.

Comment by JUG TWITTY/January 8, 2007, 9:27 am


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 01:18:08 AM
Joran quotes a June 12th PV from Freddy....do we show one or this one somewhere??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 01:22:31 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
The rest of Chapter 4 translated by Ramm at BFN and also copied in our Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

page 4 (and a bit part 5 as it is the last page of this chapter):

- On Aruba girls give it up (sex) much more easily. The weather is nice, everybody is a lot nicer. If it gets hot here (weather) than the hormones also start acting up. There are girls here who are just here for the sex, nothing more and nothing less. They are not stupid. I don't have the illusion that they were all smitten/infatuated with me.

- On Aruba you must also expect that your girlfriend might be getting it on with someone else too. It is a small island. You all go to the same schools, know the same crowd, go to the same clubs to go out and pick up girls. You have to be really good in order to be a player. Joran personally knows a few guys who have 2 or 3 phones for that reason. Joran only had 1 and that was private. I did not like it when girls were looking in my phone who I had been phoning/text messaging with. "If you would trust me, you would not check up on my through my phone" is what Joran would say to them. But he did not deserve that trust because he was no angel.



Isn't that great how he talks about the Aruban girls.  I hope everyone is reading  what he says about them.

I wonder if Julia Renfro is reading this.  Isn't she the one who made the comment about the MB kids.


Wearing a banner, claiming herself as Miss Idaho, Julia Renfro stated the little Bible toting bitch got what she was asking for...(sic)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:23:06 AM
Janet - San sent me copies of the NE the other day.  I knew it was true but really didn't want to post the pictures in the forum.  All we know for sure is that they are dating though so who knows, maybe she and Jug will get back together.  Time will tell, they have both been through so much.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:24:19 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Joran quotes a June 12th PV from Freddy....do we show one or this one somewhere??


I don't think we have it.  Maybe we'll get a translation of it from Ramm or Hannie C.

As you can see by the Dr. Phil document, there are many that we haven't seen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 01:26:19 AM
Thanks Klaas.

Good Night Monkeys!

10:30 PM PDST


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:26:43 AM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Thanks Klaas.

Good Night Monkeys!

10:30 PM PDST

Nite Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:45:05 AM
I posted this in the previous thread but I thought I'd post it again anyway:

And here is a timeline of cell phone calls/messages and computer activity based on police statements.

2:26 - 2:34 cell phone call from Joran to Deepak, 8 minutes. Deepak says Joran walking, bad connection.

2:34 - Val checks hotmail on VDS computer. Prior to Vals login, no computer activity shown since 10:30 when Joran logged in to check hotmail.

2:46- Deepak sends text to Joran asking him to call when he gets home.

NO INTERMEDIATE 3:00 a.m. call.

3:07 - val navigates to plane forum

3:11 - Joran sends text message to Flor.

3:13 -- [6 minutes after val logs on to forum on VDS computer] Joran sends text from cell to Deepak's MSN saying he's home and will go online.

3:25 - Deepak sends 4 messages from his MSN screen name to Joran's MSN screen name. Joran misses the messages and says he's in kitchen.

3:33 - Message sent from Joran's MSN screen name to Deepak's MSN screen name.

3:35 - Joran's hotmail accessed.

3:35 - Message from Joran's MSN name to Deepak's MSN name.

3:40, 3:45 - Soccer sites visited

3:46, 3:56 - Porn sites visited

4:30 - Joran's hotmail accessed


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:51:10 AM
DEEPAK'S June 29th Statement.  He is referring to May 30th when he got home after leaving Joran and Natalee:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=192

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.


REALLY?  On May 30, 2005 you thought your phone and computers were being monitored??  


DEEPAK'S June 13, 2005 statement:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=182

To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 02:02:34 AM
Posted by PearlinUSA at BFN:

Joran, freddy, Jaime frequent pools & beaches for girls… SEX
Freddy is said to have been one who opened up this paradise to him .. last chapter SEX
Lot of girls wanting one night stand per joran’s thinking.  SEX
To get their trust lie and say you are a tourist too.  SEX  
This way they won’t think you are trying to get them in the sack. SEX
The more you use this lie the easier it will be to score .. SEX.
Disrespecting a girl to Joran means you would hit them.  SEX okay
SEX since age 14.
Parents allow girls to stay over night with him.  Don’t suspect SEX.
Girls decide how far and how quick they go.  Blame game.  SEX
Girls used him for SEX .. not under illusion were smitten with him.
Joran must be good .. to be a player .. SEX
Friends with MULTIPLE PHONES for being a player .. SEX
Joran and friends sometimes RENT a HOTEL room for SEX.
3 guys and 3 girls for 1 room .. SEX
WE did take photos of TOPLESS girl .. SEX .. porn interest.
Acknowledges self as a PUBLIC FIGURE .. ppl can say what they want about him.
Always has condoms, enough to share with friends … SEX

But with missing Natalee, no sex, no condom, no room, no friends, no transportation, no respect, left her, never said goodbye, never told her he was going …… yeah! Right!
Ballsy .. uh huh!  


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 02:08:37 AM
Joran better tell mom about school #7

VAN DER SLOOT:  ... as a mom you‘re very angry that they drive a kid to the hotel to—these are three boys that just like any other 17-year teenager, he wanted to do his best to bring somebody to the hotel safe and this happened.  And we don‘t know what happened after that.  So I‘m just standing behind my son.  I think he‘s a great kid.  He was ready to go to school.  He got accepted at six universities in the states.

http://tinyurl.com/36xrea

They all lie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 02:10:06 AM
Pearl is great.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 02:10:57 AM
Buckeye - YEP to both of your posts above  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 02:14:03 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 02:27:16 AM
Goodnight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sirensong on May 06, 2007, 03:48:16 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Paulus read Joran's book, before Joran ever published it. Goes to show us, Paulus is not as intelligent as he would have us all believe. The book tells of his poor parenting skills, IMO


And Anita was in the Netherlands helping him with the book.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 04:37:50 AM
We need a better translator..  :x

is follow try bone aruba in luz negative owing to try hinca corupcion in mouth of advocate of parents of holloway

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/06.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 07:59:20 AM
Well, I don’t think Joran’s book will be winning any prizes.  What an amateurish bunch of drivel coming from an overly inflated teenage ego.  Some of it does prove out the early suspicions about that night.  The pickup line about being a tourist is most notable.  The rest of it is ego stroking crap.  Someone needs to put that guy’s fat head in a vice and slowly squeeze the truth out of his lying mouth!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 08:25:12 AM
I didn’t watch either program last night, but I noticed that Fox’s Crime Scene and CBS’ 48 Hours/Mystery both did a show about Kathy Augustine last night.  Why?  Is there something new going on with that case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 06, 2007, 08:50:21 AM
Ok, sales of Joran's "  book ". Someone said that is was 13  ?? / 60
in Holland. Very small country, does not translate into the same thing as in the USA would. Need a number for sales.
Don't forget he had a co author who did most of the work.
What wil he do with his money ?
Buy more plaid shirts
Drink
Gamble
More shoes
Did we see one postive review ? NO ! They are laffing at him in the low country.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 08:52:01 AM
Good morning.  I am still way back in the last thread trying to catch up.  

I'm about where IndyDan is talking about tools and berries and talking.

Just past the ice skating picture.  Talk about coffee on the monitor!!  

I'll be caught up here eventually.

How are ya this morning, friends?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 08:56:31 AM
Sunday, 06 May 2007 08:56

Local police chief Guilhermino Encarnacao yesterday said detectives had a suspect in mind, but he was not able to discuss details out of fear of putting her life in danger.

It is thought that Madeleine and her abductor are still in the area she was staying in with her family when last seen.

<img src="http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/Madeleine.jpg">


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 08:58:26 AM
Messed up my image thing.  One of the latest pictures taken of little Maddy McCann.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/Madeleine.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 09:18:31 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Sunday, 06 May 2007 08:56

Local police chief Guilhermino Encarnacao yesterday said detectives had a suspect in mind, but he was not able to discuss details out of fear of putting her life in danger.

It is thought that Madeleine and her abductor are still in the area she was staying in with her family when last seen.

<img src="http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/Madeleine.jpg">


Yo, Handsome!  Ya lost me here.  Help out your fruity chemo-brained faithful reader!  What's the scoop here?


"And even though I know how very far apart we are,
it helps to think we might be wishing on the same bright star.

And when the night wind starts to sing a lonesome lullaby,
it helps to think we're sleeping underneath the same big sky."
("Somewhere Out There")  
Thinking about you and  yours......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:23:57 AM
Good Morning everyone.

I have no new news.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 09:25:13 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Sunday, 06 May 2007 08:56

Local police chief Guilhermino Encarnacao yesterday said detectives had a suspect in mind, but he was not able to discuss details out of fear of putting her life in danger.

It is thought that Madeleine and her abductor are still in the area she was staying in with her family when last seen.

<img src="http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/Madeleine.jpg">


Yo, Handsome!  Ya lost me here.  Help out your fruity chemo-brained faithful reader!  What's the scoop here?


"And even though I know how very far apart we are,
it helps to think we might be wishing on the same bright star.

And when the night wind starts to sing a lonesome lullaby,
it helps to think we're sleeping underneath the same big sky."
("Somewhere Out There")  
Thinking about you and  yours......


Sorry Peaches - I was searching for updates on the little girl that disappeared from her hotel room in Portugal and that was all I could find dated this morning.  Also wanted to post a recent picture of the little girl, but I used the wrong tags.

How are you doing these days?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 09:28:51 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Good Morning everyone.

I have no new news.


Good Morning Rob!  I got nuttin new needer....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:30:52 AM
Looking at the 'book' (if you want to call it that) of Joran, it strikes me that we are dealing with an entire group of people with very very low IQs. Not just the Sloots, but Oduber, Croes, you name 'em... the whole cabal of 'em.

These people are easily swayed and the people that believe the horse crap in Joran's book make Joran look like a genius. No wonder they all thought he was so smart.

For some reason, they thought they were going to out smart us all. Some gall they have huh?

To your question, who is the stupidest person on Aruba, I declare it is Nelson Oduber.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:34:38 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Rob"
Good Morning everyone.

I have no new news.


Good Morning Rob!  I got nuttin new needer....


no one does Easy-

Good Morning to you Bro-

I've been talking to a few people and no one knows anything. I guess this is a good thing.

They are either building the mother of all cases, or they are getting outta Dodge because they have nothing.... too hard to tell what will happen next...
I can't even begin to guess.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 09:35:17 AM
Hi, Rob.  Easy, I'm good.  Feeling better and better. No mo chemo!  CT scan set for this Wednesday.  I expect good news.  

On this case, I think no news may be good news.  I hope the Dutch have TONS of new stuff to analyze and are busy doing just that.  I don't care if the Dutch don't give me a progress report.  As long as they do their job.  That's all I've ever asked of anyone.  Just do your freakin' job!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:37:28 AM
About lil Madeleine McCann....I get the feeling this is a hotel worker...I hope I'm wrong. But it looks like a crime of opportunity....as most are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:39:31 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Hi, Rob.  Easy, I'm good.  Feeling better and better. No mo chemo!  CT scan set for this Wednesday.  I expect good news.  

On this case, I think no news may be good news.  I hope the Dutch have TONS of new stuff to analyze and are busy doing just that.  I don't care if the Dutch don't give me a progress report.  As long as they do their job.  That's all I've ever asked of anyone.  Just do your freakin' job!


I know were all so glad you are feeling better.. I bet you feel like an 18 year old again as your strength comes back Peaches.

I KNOW you will have great news. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 09:40:44 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Rob"
Good Morning everyone.

I have no new news.


Good Morning Rob!  I got nuttin new needer....


no one does Easy-

Good Morning to you Bro-

I've been talking to a few people and no one knows anything. I guess this is a good thing.

They are either building the mother of all cases, or they are getting outta Dodge because they have nothing.... too hard to tell what will happen next...
I can't even begin to guess.


My hopes are that they are carefully making their case and I am going to stick with that thought until shown otherwise.

I'm told it is already hot in Aruba, no rain is expected for months and thank God for AC.  I wonder if that weather will bother Joran's hormones. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:43:29 AM
Easy, it usually only rains on Aruba in Dec - Jan and Feb... other than that it very very dry. I doubt this is much different that years past.

What about Paulus' hormones? He always looks overheated!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 09:43:43 AM
Peaches – Glad you have such good personal news!  You have always been a real trooper in the face of adversity.

I’m sitting here on a lazy Sunday morning eating leftover pizza and wondering why my arteries are colgged up like the drian pipe coming out of the Sloot house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 09:47:26 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
About lil Madeleine McCann....I get the feeling this is a hotel worker...I hope I'm wrong. But it looks like a crime of opportunity....as most are.


I'm hoping it was a kidnapping for money, or a crazy woman wanting a child.  I don't want to think about the statistically obvious motive for such a thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 09:47:45 AM
Hi all whats up !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 09:49:09 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Looking at the 'book' (if you want to call it that) of Joran, it strikes me that we are dealing with an entire group of people with very very low IQs. Not just the Sloots, but Oduber, Croes, you name 'em... the whole cabal of 'em.

These people are easily swayed and the people that believe the horse crap in Joran's book make Joran look like a genius. No wonder they all thought he was so smart.

For some reason, they thought they were going to out smart us all. Some gall they have huh?

To your question, who is the stupidest person on Aruba, I declare it is Nelson Oduber.


I agree.

Good Morning Everyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 09:49:20 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Peaches – Glad you have such good personal news!  You have always been a real trooper in the face of adversity.

I’m sitting here on a lazy Sunday morning eating leftover pizza and wondering why my arteries are colgged up like the drian pipe coming out of the Sloot house.


Perhaps YOU are the one who needs to be drinking the Raspbery/Cottage Cheese/Flaxseed Oil/Honey Smoothie that my DH makes for me every day!  (recipe yours for the asking.) It's anti-tumor, unclogs the pipes, lowers the BP and tastes dandy.  

Seriously, thanks Rob and Easy for your continued support.  I could not have done it without you all.  Love you mean it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:50:16 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi all whats up !!


What up???!!!... Bendex Welcome Back...

How's the Pampas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:52:30 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Rob"
Looking at the 'book' (if you want to call it that) of Joran, it strikes me that we are dealing with an entire group of people with very very low IQs. Not just the Sloots, but Oduber, Croes, you name 'em... the whole cabal of 'em.

These people are easily swayed and the people that believe the horse crap in Joran's book make Joran look like a genius. No wonder they all thought he was so smart.

For some reason, they thought they were going to out smart us all. Some gall they have huh?

To your question, who is the stupidest person on Aruba, I declare it is Nelson Oduber.


I agree.

Good Morning Everyone.


Good Morning San-

If I were Oduber, I would not want my name linked eternally to the Sloots. I would want to be known as the person who said 'No one is above the law on Aruba'...

But Oduber is not all that bright either.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 09:52:40 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Peaches – Glad you have such good personal news!  You have always been a real trooper in the face of adversity.

I’m sitting here on a lazy Sunday morning eating leftover pizza and wondering why my arteries are colgged up like the drian pipe coming out of the Sloot house.


Perhaps YOU are the one who needs to be drinking the Raspbery/Cottage Cheese/Flaxseed Oil/Honey Smoothie that my DH makes for me every day!  (recipe yours for the asking.) It's anti-tumor, unclogs the pipes, lowers the BP and tastes dandy.  

Seriously, thanks Rob and Easy for your continued support.  I could not have done it without you all.  Love you mean it.


Hmmmm, yummy!  I take heavy hits of Crestor and niacin to counteract my need for pizza in the morning. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 09:54:06 AM
Hi rob what is the story behind tatjikistan , pampas are great !!! I just finished a canoeing trip of 10 days on the river parana  .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:59:25 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi rob what is the story behind tatjikistan , pampas are great !!! I just finished a canoeing trip of 10 days on the river parana  .


BENDEX
I have no idea why I relocated to Tajikistan...LOL.. I think I put that up there when the US Military was rolling through every place under the sun with 'Stan' as the ending syllable.

Pampas are great!

Glad to see you back here. I bet you saw some amazing things on your canoing trip. I bet everyone would love to see some pics... do you have a photo-bucket somewhere?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 09:59:34 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Rob"
Looking at the 'book' (if you want to call it that) of Joran, it strikes me that we are dealing with an entire group of people with very very low IQs. Not just the Sloots, but Oduber, Croes, you name 'em... the whole cabal of 'em.

These people are easily swayed and the people that believe the horse crap in Joran's book make Joran look like a genius. No wonder they all thought he was so smart.

For some reason, they thought they were going to out smart us all. Some gall they have huh?

To your question, who is the stupidest person on Aruba, I declare it is Nelson Oduber.


I agree.

Good Morning Everyone.


Good Morning San-

If I were Oduber, I would not want my name linked eternally to the Sloots. I would want to be known as the person who said 'No one is above the law on Aruba'...

But Oduber is not all that bright either.

I agree Rob that Oduber isn't that bright.  It is Rudy Croes who Oduber is listening to.  All Oduber had to do is give up all the phone and computer records and the case would be closed.

My question is was Rudy Croes one of the first people Paulus called.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:01:01 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi rob what is the story behind tatjikistan , pampas are great !!! I just finished a canoeing trip of 10 days on the river parana  .


Is that Bendex I see?  Welcome back Bendex!!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/bendexnew.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 10:01:07 AM
Easy... don't neglect the Red Wino!!!! That's good for the Heart too ya know!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:01:08 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi all whats up !!


BENDEX!!!!!!!!!! (http://bestsmileys.com/hyper/6.gif)(http://bestsmileys.com/hyper/6.gif)(http://bestsmileys.com/hyper/6.gif)(http://bestsmileys.com/hyper/6.gif)

It's like a family reunion!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 10:02:00 AM
Bendex- Any thoughts on the case? other than it has gone on way too long?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 10:02:55 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi all whats up !!


Do my eyes deceive me or do I indeed see Bendex?  

How are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 10:06:50 AM
Quote from: "San"

My question is was Rudy Croes one of the first people Paulus called.


San- he is a logical choice now isn't he?

I can have to believe this case has mushroomed into something far worse than the original crimes (if they weren't bad enough on their own) into something that is going to take a bit of brawn and brains to tear limb from limb. The Aruban Authorities have had 2 years to monkey(no pun intended) with all the records. It's going to take a lead investigator with more than just savvy to unravel this thing and get to the bottom of who did what.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 10:10:58 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy... don't neglect the Red Wino!!!! That's good for the Heart too ya know!


For some reason I do not tend to like things that are good for me. Unless cigareets and whiskey and wild, wild women qualify..... lol  Just kidding, sorta.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 10:16:40 AM
Yes indeed same old bendex ,this time new girlfriend new girl friend . I have taken pictures with my cellular phone unfortunataly she got wet she does not work any more. I went rowing with a brazilian and an argentinian . We found some cool fossils , and met some great people on our trip and ate lots of fish which we caught on the river . Now I am preparing for my semesteral trip to europe to say hi to mum and dad .

Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi rob what is the story behind tatjikistan , pampas are great !!! I just finished a canoeing trip of 10 days on the river parana  .


Is that Bendex I see?  Welcome back Bendex!!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/bendexnew.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:26:14 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Yes indeed same old bendex ,this time new girlfriend new girl friend . I have taken pictures with my cellular phone unfortunataly she got wet she does not work any more. I went rowing with a brazilian and an argentinian . We found some cool fossils , and met some great people on our trip and ate lots of fish which we caught on the river . Now I am preparing for my semesteral trip to europe to say hi to mum and dad .

Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi rob what is the story behind tatjikistan , pampas are great !!! I just finished a canoeing trip of 10 days on the river parana  .


Is that Bendex I see?  Welcome back Bendex!!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/bendexnew.gif)


Have you been able to keep up at all with Natalee's case during your adventures?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 10:26:59 AM
Good Morning everyone-

I didn't know you prior Bendex but welcome back ! Rob has some great water shoe photos to show you  :lol:

My concern is that Oduber was either being blackmailed by Paulus or had some dirty hands from involvement or knowledge of the night Natalee disappeared.

FYI, I just put a post in the pet food thread but it's alarming, now countries are finding toxic tainted medicines coming from China so I did want to alert the lively for our own FDA put out a warning regarding it recently but did not detail it was China !

excerpted, link to fully report on thread in lounge
Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned drug makers and suppliers in the United States "to be especially vigilant" in watching for diethylene glycol. The warning did not specifically mention China, and it said there was "no reason to believe" that glycerin in this country was tainted. Even so, the agency called for all glycerin shipments to be tested for diethylene glycol, and said it was "exploring how supplies of glycerin become contaminated."

China is already being accused by U.S. authorities of exporting wheat gluten with an industrial chemical, melamine, that ended up in pet food and animal feed. The FDA recently banned imports of Chinese-made wheat gluten after it was linked to pet deaths in the United States.

Beyond Panama and China, toxic syrup has caused mass poisonings in Haiti, Bangladesh, Argentina, Nigeria and India.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:28:57 AM
TY for the information, None.

That is very scary.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 10:30:31 AM
I just read that Joranus has published a book or something with his side of the story , when I get to the netherlands I will buy it . Weird that Joran wants to publish a book about the case . While the case does not have lots of following and or public interest in the netherlands. I mean if you are  supposedly innocent , why attract more attention , If it for the money It shows bad taste. I have not followed the case for a longtime . So I cannot comment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:33:26 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
I just read that Joranus has published a book or something with his side of the story , when I get to the netherlands I will buy it . Weird that Joran wants to publish a book about the case . While the case does not have lots of following and or public interest in the netherlands. I mean if you are  supposedly innocent , why attract more attention , If it for the money It shows bad taste. I have not followed the case for a longtime . So I cannot comment.


He seems to be publishing the book both for the money and the attention. I don't think the possibility that he could be incriminating himself has ever occured to him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:33:29 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
I just read that Joranus has published a book or something with his side of the story , when I get to the netherlands I will buy it . Weird that Joran wants to publish a book about the case . While the case does not have lots of following and or public interest in the netherlands. I mean if you are  supposedly innocent , why attract more attention , If it for the money It shows bad taste. I have not followed the case for a longtime . So I cannot comment.


Bendex - since the book is not published in English, there are several people translating it as they read.  We have a thread where I put those translations.  Currently, it's through chapter 4.  

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

General consensus so far from the Netherlands is that the book makes Joran look more guilty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 10:35:11 AM
Yes I ran in some adventures , Some fool stabbed me with a knife In my back , so I was out of rotation for a few months .


Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Yes indeed same old bendex ,this time new girlfriend new girl friend . I have taken pictures with my cellular phone unfortunataly she got wet she does not work any more. I went rowing with a brazilian and an argentinian . We found some cool fossils , and met some great people on our trip and ate lots of fish which we caught on the river . Now I am preparing for my semesteral trip to europe to say hi to mum and dad .

Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Hi rob what is the story behind tatjikistan , pampas are great !!! I just finished a canoeing trip of 10 days on the river parana  .


Is that Bendex I see?  Welcome back Bendex!!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/bendexnew.gif)


Have you been able to keep up at all with Natalee's case during your adventures?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 10:36:05 AM
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/6300

Sunday May 6,2007

KIDNAPPED toddler Madeleine McCann is in the clutches of a paedophile, Portuguese police said last night.

_____________________


http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/05/06/portugal.girl.reut/index.html

POSTED: 9:43 a.m. EDT, May 6, 2007

PORTIMAO, Portugal (Reuters) -- The parents of a three-year-old British girl abducted from a holiday beach resort in Portugal prayed on Sunday for her safe return, saying they continued to hope she would be found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 06, 2007, 10:36:28 AM
Hi BENDEX - Good to see you back, and hope you are well! I think we have a thread that gives a summary (rather than translation), by chapter, of Joran's book.

A team of Dutch investigators landed on Aruba a few weeks ago and notched up the investigation. They (finally) searched the VDS property last weekend.

How did you celebrate the Queen's birthday? Is that when you did your river trip?

Have you heard from Hat lately? He pops in occasionally.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:36:41 AM
Bendex - Yes, Hat stopped by and told us about that.  Sounds like it was pretty serious if you were out of rotation for a few months.  Glad you are all better now.  Did they arrest the guy who stabbed you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:37:00 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Yes I ran in some adventures , Some fool stabbed me with a knife In my back , so I was out of rotation for a few months .


Oh  my gosh!  :shock:

That's really frightening! I'm glad you're doing okay now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 10:40:02 AM
Bendex- So the story about you being stabbed was TRUE. I'm glad you sound to be OK... but the reality is, you are a victim of some FOOL.

Glad you're still with us!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 10:43:52 AM
Good Morning Peaches

I am thankful that all is going well.

Have a good Sunday.

Janet


Psalm 118:24
This is the day the LORD has made; let us rejoice and be glad in it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 10:44:58 AM
The stupid thing was that it was all about an discussion of Biljet of 100 false pesos (aporximatly 30 usd ) some guy accused me of paying him with false Bill a week earlier and treatend me , I called his bluf , the next thing I knew I was at the front of my house with kitchen knife in my back .

Quote from: "Rob"
Bendex- So the story about you being stabbed was TRUE. I'm glad you sound to be OK... but the reality is, you are a victim of some FOOL.

Glad you're still with us!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:46:16 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
The stupid thing was that it was all about an discussion of Biljet of 100 false pesos (aporximatly 30 usd ) some guy accused me of paying him with false Bill a week earlier and treatend me , I called his bluf , the next thing I knew I was at the front of my house with kitchen knife in my back .



Bendex, that's terrible. Is the guy in jail now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:47:48 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
The stupid thing was that it was all about an discussion of Biljet of 100 false pesos (aporximatly 30 usd ) some guy accused me of paying him with false Bill a week earlier and treatend me , I called his bluf , the next thing I knew I was at the front of my house with kitchen knife in my back .

Quote from: "Rob"
Bendex- So the story about you being stabbed was TRUE. I'm glad you sound to be OK... but the reality is, you are a victim of some FOOL.

Glad you're still with us!


Geeze Bendex, what a fool he was.  I'm glad you're OK now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 10:48:50 AM
Thank you, Janet.  Have a great day.

Bendex, I am relieved you are recovered.  Be careful!  You know anytime you have any reallyl cool pics, you could probably email them to Klaas who could put them in a photo thread.  Those of us who hate to fly would love to live vicariously through others.  Well, I would.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 10:54:12 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
The stupid thing was that it was all about an discussion of Biljet of 100 false pesos (aporximatly 30 usd ) some guy accused me of paying him with false Bill a week earlier and treatend me , I called his bluf , the next thing I knew I was at the front of my house with kitchen knife in my back .

Quote from: "Rob"
Bendex- So the story about you being stabbed was TRUE. I'm glad you sound to be OK... but the reality is, you are a victim of some FOOL.

Glad you're still with us!


jeezz!!! :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 10:54:43 AM
Well my friends brought me to a public hospital , Which are really disguting overhere . There I met with vice chief of police at my bed in the morning . ( there are not to many dutch guys around in my hometown so that certainly attracted the attention of the police. )And he offerded me the following deal , Or pass 2 years of juridical proceses , lawyers etc, or pay the police 200 usd to take care of him . So I paid  200 usd they kicked the hell out of this guy and let him go .

Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
The stupid thing was that it was all about an discussion of Biljet of 100 false pesos (aporximatly 30 usd ) some guy accused me of paying him with false Bill a week earlier and treatend me , I called his bluf , the next thing I knew I was at the front of my house with kitchen knife in my back .



Bendex, that's terrible. Is the guy in jail now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:56:49 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Well my friends brought me to a public hospital , Which are really disguting overhere . There I met with vice chief of police at my bed in the morning . ( there are not to many dutch guys around in my hometown so that certainly attracted the attention of the police. )And he offerded me the following deal , Or pass 2 years of juridical proceses , lawyers etc, or pay the police 200 usd to take care of him . So I paid  200 usd they kicked the hell out of this guy and let him go .


Well, that's certainly one way of handling it.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 06, 2007, 11:01:59 AM
O/T - Just read that today is the 70th "anniversary" of the Hindenburg disaster ...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/H/HINDENBURG_70TH?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US

Excerpts:

Seventy years ago Sunday, the hydrogen-filled Hindenburg ignited while easing toward its mooring mast at the U.S. Navy base in Lakehurst. The blaze killed 35 people on board and one person in the ground crew; 62 passengers and crew members survived.

<snip>

The huge airship - more than three times longer than a Boeing 747 - was engulfed in flames and sank to the ground in less than a minute. Photographers and newsreel crews on hand for the landing captured the scene, and a shocked radio station broadcaster recorded the often replayed phrase "Oh, the humanity and all the passengers!"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:03:19 AM
Could we all pitch in and have those cops have a talk  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:04:23 AM
with Joran?

I think the pizza grrease has having an efffect on my typing skills.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:05:19 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
with Joran?

I think the pizza grrease has having an efffect on my typing skills.  :lol:

LOL - you think if we all pitch in we might get a little more than $200?   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 11:06:39 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
with Joran?

I think the pizza grrease has having an efffect on my typing skills.  :lol:

LOL - you think if we all pitch in we might get a little more than $200?   :lol:  :lol:


I'm certainly willing to contribute.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:07:18 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
with Joran?

I think the pizza grrease has having an efffect on my typing skills.  :lol:

LOL - you think if we all pitch in we might get a little more than $200?   :lol:  :lol:


Not a whole lot more. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 11:07:44 AM
Hi Miss Marple . ,

Well I did not celebrate queensday in Argentina. Yes during that time I was floating with my Kayak sloop john B downsteam . I took my trip from Lapaz City in Argentina to Rosario . Was an amazing trip , Everytime we arrived in small villages people lent us there garden for camping or let us use there facilities for nothing . I really regained confidence in people again.

Quote from: "msmarple"
Hi BENDEX - Good to see you back, and hope you are well! I think we have a thread that gives a summary (rather than translation), by chapter, of Joran's book.

A team of Dutch investigators landed on Aruba a few weeks ago and notched up the investigation. They (finally) searched the VDS property last weekend.

How did you celebrate the Queen's birthday? Is that when you did your river trip?

Have you heard from Hat lately? He pops in occasionally.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 11:08:48 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
with Joran?

I think the pizza grrease has having an efffect on my typing skills.  :lol:

LOL - you think if we all pitch in we might get a little more than $200?   :lol:  :lol:


I think we could make the lotto folks envious at the prospects of "pursuading" Joran to tell the truth!  :lol:

Hi Y'all!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:10:27 AM
Bendex – You should really start a web based photo journal  detailing your adventures.  I bet it would be a hit!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:10:42 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK'S June 29th Statement.  He is referring to May 30th when he got home after leaving Joran and Natalee:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=192

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.


REALLY?  On May 30, 2005 you thought your phone and computers were being monitored??  


DEEPAK'S June 13, 2005 statement:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=182

To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


WHY WOULD DEEPAK BE TRYING TO "MESS UP" AN INVESTIGATION THINKING HE WAS BEING MONITORED IN THE EARLY MORNING HOURS OF 5/30/2005?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 06, 2007, 11:10:53 AM
I would say I am shocked,but why lie.i feel this is as honest as he gets,except for the non-sharing women parts.Hmm,I always keep a condom in my pocket,lie number 876.They do work together,so I despise them all.Does this mean that gvc 's sister shares these mores.She should talk,as part of her job and for her gender.i am to sick sick of these people,so I better shut up


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 06, 2007, 11:12:19 AM
Oh CBB,I saw you last night on stage at the Elton John Concert.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:14:02 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK'S June 29th Statement.  He is referring to May 30th when he got home after leaving Joran and Natalee:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=192

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.


REALLY?  On May 30, 2005 you thought your phone and computers were being monitored??  


DEEPAK'S June 13, 2005 statement:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=182

To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


WHY WOULD DEEPAK BE TRYING TO "MESS UP" AN INVESTIGATION THINKING HE WAS BEING MONITORED IN THE EARLY MORNING HOURS OF 5/30/2005?


BECAUSE HE IS GUILTY AS HELL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:16:00 AM
It sure seems like a lot happened in a very short time that night and morning.  Or, is that just because we have been looking at every minute so closely for so long?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 11:16:22 AM
Okay fellow monkeys feels great to be back , I certainly hope hat will be around soon , I will sent him an email . I am going to walk with my dog cozmo to  the antiques market to see If I can earn a quick buck . See you later all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:16:54 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Okay fellow monkeys feels great to be back , I certainly hope hat will be around soon , I will sent him an email . I am going to walk with my dog cozmo to  the antiques market to see If I can earn a quick buck . See you later all.


Have a great day Bendex - see you later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 11:18:25 AM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Oh CBB,I saw you last night on stage at the Elton John Concert.


 :shock:

I must have been having a REALLY good time 'cause I don't even remember it this morning!  :lol:

Actually, that's sort of a replay from the Elton concert I went to 3 years ago..........didn't remember much of that one either, but I had a GREAT time!  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BENDEX on May 06, 2007, 11:19:21 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Bendex – You should really start a web based photo journal  detailing your adventures.  I bet it would be a hit!



I have an apple mac foto account of the antiques , paintings and sculptures I buy . But I will dedicade a page for the monkeys to give them an impression of the live of an semi argentian monkey life over here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:22:43 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Bendex – You should really start a web based photo journal  detailing your adventures.  I bet it would be a hit!



I have an apple mac foto account of the antiques , paintings and sculptures I buy . But I will dedicade a page for the monkeys to give them an impression of the live of an semi argentian monkey life over here.

Very cool Bendex - looking forward to that!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 06, 2007, 11:29:23 AM
Morning monkeys...!

Glad to see Bendex...been a long time....lots of adventures....happy to see you are okay.... :D

Still reading and lurking....agree with so much that is said...but don't have any stunning thoughts about the case....just hoping that the Dutch will
do the right thing.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 11:29:40 AM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Bendex – You should really start a web based photo journal  detailing your adventures.  I bet it would be a hit!



I have an apple mac foto account of the antiques , paintings and sculptures I buy . But I will dedicade a page for the monkeys to give them an impression of the live of an semi argentian monkey life over here.


Sounds like a plan!

I’ve had a long-term fanatasy about taking an early retirement, loading up my cameras and traveling across this country.  Documenting my travels as I go with pictures and words.  My adventures will be much more mundane than yours, but I think it would be a fun look at a certain aspect of Americano.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 11:31:53 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
DEEPAK'S June 29th Statement.  He is referring to May 30th when he got home after leaving Joran and Natalee:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=192

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.


REALLY?  On May 30, 2005 you thought your phone and computers were being monitored??  


DEEPAK'S June 13, 2005 statement:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=182

To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


WHY WOULD DEEPAK BE TRYING TO "MESS UP" AN INVESTIGATION THINKING HE WAS BEING MONITORED IN THE EARLY MORNING HOURS OF 5/30/2005?



No man has a good enough memory to make a successful liar ... Abraham Lincoln

Have a good day Klaas.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 11:33:17 AM
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:34:06 AM
Janet - you too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:35:50 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 11:38:52 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.




yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:38:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.


Both.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 11:45:13 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.


Yeah...........that's a big nail capable of tightening the lid on this whole case, and I'm just scratching my head trying to figure out why WE know it and nobody in authority seems to pay any attention to it!  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 11:46:36 AM
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:50:05 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.


Yeah...........that's a big nail capable of tightening the lid on this whole case, and I'm just scratching my head trying to figure out why WE know it and nobody in authority seems to pay any attention to it!  :roll:

Deepak made this statement about 10-15 days after what happened to Natalee.  He knows there are phone records and there must be a hell of a lot we haven't seen.  Like Klaas said he knows exactly what happened and is making an excuse because they have something on him regarding those records.  No way could his phone have been monitored a few hours after he so called left Natalee and he would know this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 11:50:10 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?


Why aren't all the suspects sitting in a cell until they can explain all the inconsistencies.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:51:18 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?

Exactly CBB.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:52:54 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?


Why aren't all the suspects sitting in a cell until they can explain all the inconsistencies.  :roll:

Right and bring them all in at once and interrogate them at the same time in separate rooms.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 11:55:48 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?


Why aren't all the suspects sitting in a cell until they can explain all the inconsistencies.  :roll:

Right and bring them all in at once and interrogate them at the same time in separate rooms.


And add a timeline to their statements, put it all in a spreadsheet, compare what they claim happened, and then smack them all hard for the inconsistencies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 11:59:18 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?


Why aren't all the suspects sitting in a cell until they can explain all the inconsistencies.  :roll:

Right and bring them all in at once and interrogate them at the same time in separate rooms.


And forget the insignificant stuff. Go straight for the list of inconsistancies, and ask them all seperately, far away from each other, and Paulus. They could get a remarkable list from this forum of what to hone in on! These three haven't had any poolside chats lately and a lots been said by bass-mouth Joran since those staements were made.

The little jig dancing Joran that Klaas has made for us here would look like he's in slow motion compared to the dance that experience would inspire!

The truth would spill from one of them. My bet would be Satish!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 12:02:16 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Why isn't Deepak sitting in a cell until he can explain that statement?


Why aren't all the suspects sitting in a cell until they can explain all the inconsistencies.  :roll:

Right and bring them all in at once and interrogate them at the same time in separate rooms.


And forget the insignificant stuff. Go straight for the list of inconsistancies, and ask them all seperately, far away from each other, and Paulus. They could get a remarkable list from this forum of what to hone in on! These three haven't had any poolside chats lately and a lots been said by bass-mouth Joran since those staements were made.

The little jig dancing Joran that Klaas has made for us here would look like he's in slow motion compared to the dance that experience would inspire!

The truth would spill from one of them. My bet would be Satish!

I agree.  Satish is the weakest link.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 12:02:32 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Sunday, 06 May 2007 08:56

Local police chief Guilhermino Encarnacao yesterday said detectives had a suspect in mind, but he was not able to discuss details out of fear of putting her life in danger.

It is thought that Madeleine and her abductor are still in the area she was staying in with her family when last seen.

<img src="http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/Madeleine.jpg">


Yo, Handsome!  Ya lost me here.  Help out your fruity chemo-brained faithful reader!  What's the scoop here?


"And even though I know how very far apart we are,
it helps to think we might be wishing on the same bright star.

And when the night wind starts to sing a lonesome lullaby,
it helps to think we're sleeping underneath the same big sky."
("Somewhere Out There")  
Thinking about you and  yours......


Peaches, I hope you are doing well.  I hope your toothache is but a sad memory.  I spoke with the mother of my son's friend from Manor, Georgia, yesterday.  We had called his number to see how they were faring with the fires.  She called yesterday and said their house was threatened, and they had had to move out earlier in the week, but they were back in the house yesterday, house intact, but smoke on the horizon.  She said their house would need painting and they were cleaning it really well right then, secondary to the smell.  The good news was that they were safe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 12:05:33 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.


Yeah...........that's a big nail capable of tightening the lid on this whole case, and I'm just scratching my head trying to figure out why WE know it and nobody in authority seems to pay any attention to it!  :roll:

Deepak made this statement about 10-15 days after what happened to Natalee.  He knows there are phone records and there must be a hell of a lot we haven't seen.  Like Klaas said he knows exactly what happened and is making an excuse because they have something on him regarding those records.  No way could his phone have been monitored a few hours after he so called left Natalee and he would know this.


Unless San- his phone was being tapped BEFORE Natalee ever got to Aruba. The Goon Child was on a Watch List.. I'd still like to know why. That seems important to me.

Something else is going on here under the current that we all see. Has to be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 06, 2007, 12:07:16 PM
If they had enough NEW whatever to search, then they have enough NEW to requestion. That still is a possibility.
.
Joran's new GF must have LOW standards and be very YOUNG with no one who cares about her. IMO  
.
Most of us are parents. If you had a daughter, would you be thrilled with the choice of company your daughter was keeping ? Would you be worried that she might not return home one day ? Would you be worried about her mental health ? Dating a soul like VDSloot ? Who just is interested in sex, drinking and gambling, plus lying ? By his own admission ? My girl would have been going on a long trip far away from him and his entire family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 12:27:44 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Good Morning everyone-

I didn't know you prior Bendex but welcome back ! Rob has some great water shoe photos to show you  :lol:

My concern is that Oduber was either being blackmailed by Paulus or had some dirty hands from involvement or knowledge of the night Natalee disappeared.

FYI, I just put a post in the pet food thread but it's alarming, now countries are finding toxic tainted medicines coming from China so I did want to alert the lively for our own FDA put out a warning regarding it recently but did not detail it was China !

excerpted, link to fully report on thread in lounge
Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned drug makers and suppliers in the United States "to be especially vigilant" in watching for diethylene glycol. The warning did not specifically mention China, and it said there was "no reason to believe" that glycerin in this country was tainted. Even so, the agency called for all glycerin shipments to be tested for diethylene glycol, and said it was "exploring how supplies of glycerin become contaminated."

China is already being accused by U.S. authorities of exporting wheat gluten with an industrial chemical, melamine, that ended up in pet food and animal feed. The FDA recently banned imports of Chinese-made wheat gluten after it was linked to pet deaths in the United States.

Beyond Panama and China, toxic syrup has caused mass poisonings in Haiti, Bangladesh, Argentina, Nigeria and India.


But they are so good about obeying the green laws and have far less pollution than the USA.  Let's all gather round a tree and have a group hug for China. :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 12:31:46 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Bendex – You should really start a web based photo journal  detailing your adventures.  I bet it would be a hit!



I have an apple mac foto account of the antiques , paintings and sculptures I buy . But I will dedicade a page for the monkeys to give them an impression of the live of an semi argentian monkey life over here.


Sounds like a plan!

I’ve had a long-term fanatasy about taking an early retirement, loading up my cameras and traveling across this country.  Documenting my travels as I go with pictures and words.  My adventures will be much more mundane than yours, but I think it would be a fun look at a certain aspect of Americano.


I'm a sucker for you both.   :oops: I'd read accounts from either of you with great interest.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 12:33:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thanks Klaas for posting that statement from Deepak. It just says it all, doesn't it? They knew there was need to start confusing the investigation that would certainly come from a discovered murder.


CBB - one of two things.  Either Deepak did sexually assault Natalee OR, Deepak knew something "BAD" happened to Natalee that night.  No other way of explaining it.


Or he not only knew, he did nothing to prevent "something bad happening" to Natalee.  

If that is the case, he will be forever haunted in his heart for his failure to perform as a human being.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 12:33:45 PM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Bendex – You should really start a web based photo journal  detailing your adventures.  I bet it would be a hit!



I have an apple mac foto account of the antiques , paintings and sculptures I buy . But I will dedicade a page for the monkeys to give them an impression of the live of an semi argentian monkey life over here.


Looking forward to this.  I would love to see them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 12:36:27 PM
Glad to hear your friends are currently safe from the fires. I had no idea it was so huge!  I've been staying pretty close to home lately.

The site of the tooth formerly known as #18 is healing nicely, thanks.  And the price beat a root canal!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 12:37:50 PM
ROB SAYS:

Unless San- his phone was being tapped BEFORE Natalee ever got to Aruba. The Goon Child was on a Watch List.. I'd still like to know why. That seems important to me.

Something else is going on here under the current that we all see. Has to be.[/quote]

******

I believe that.  There was and is something going on with the sporter that ALE knows about and perhaps many them including Rudy Croes, Oduber, et al, are involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 12:42:02 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy, it usually only rains on Aruba in Dec - Jan and Feb... other than that it very very dry. I doubt this is much different that years past.

What about Paulus' hormones? He always looks overheated!


G'Day all,

One correction, as Aruba's "rainy" season is November-December.  The tradewinds usually keep the weather at bay January-March so there is not much more than a late afternoon sun shower there during those months.  Even in the rainy season you are looking at maybe an inch a week (there of course are exceptions to every rule of thumb).


Annual Rainfall Averages for Aruba

 Month      Average rainfall (inch)
 January      2.2
 February     1.0
 March         0.7
 April           0.9
 May            0.8
 June           1.0
 July            1.4
 August        1.3
 September  1.2
 October       3.9
 November   4.6
 December   4.0


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 12:52:55 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDeepakSatishMay30.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 12:55:57 PM
I think they know everything...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 12:56:50 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I think they know everything...


Can you tell I want to make a point of their statements  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 01:00:26 PM
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 01:00:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDeepakSatishMay30.gif)



THIS is EXCELLENT!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 01:01:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I think they know everything...


Can you tell I want to make a point of their statements  :wink:


Yep  :wink:   I'm fully expecting it to show up on the Front Page...  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:03:03 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I think they know everything...


Can you tell I want to make a point of their statements  :wink:


Yep  :wink:   I'm fully expecting it to show up on the Front Page...  :wink:


That is my plan if Red sees my email  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 01:03:38 PM
Last night Nancy Grace had a rerun from the previous weekend show with Jossy and Dave and several call ins(I wonder if it was our Patti calling in).

It was a rerun, but I was glad to see the continued coverage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:04:41 PM
This is the same DEEPAK KALPOE that is seeking $800 million in damages from Dr. Phil for defamation of character.......

GMAB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 01:05:57 PM
Exactly, Klaasend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 01:06:27 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


I didn't know that. THAT could explain a LOT!
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/pondboots2copy.jpg)
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/kswiss.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 06, 2007, 01:08:32 PM
I'd like to still frame Joran's entrance into the casino to see if we could get a look at the shoes he was wearing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:10:11 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'd like to still frame Joran's entrance into the casino to see if we could get a look at the shoes he was wearing.

I've tried and it's hard to tell.  He's definately wearing tennis shoes that are white.  

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/abcjoranshoes.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 01:11:18 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


Steve should take a look at my stills taken from the Aru-Bay videos if he hasnt already. I wonder if he has seen the red areas on the rocks and the workup I did on the bag and shoes observed adjacent to the fisherman's huts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 01:12:01 PM
CBB, I think we have that still-frame of the casino entrance somewhere.  I'll look.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 01:15:19 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


Steve should take a look at my stills taken from the Aru-Bay videos if he hasnt already. I wonder if he has seen the red areas on the rocks and the workup I did on the bag and shoes observed adjacent to the fisherman's huts.


link: http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=108


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:17:30 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


Steve should take a look at my stills taken from the Aru-Bay videos if he hasnt already. I wonder if he has seen the red areas on the rocks and the workup I did on the bag and shoes observed adjacent to the fisherman's huts.


link: http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=108


Good idea Spock - I'll post the link on the front page under his post.  Hopefully he'll read back and see it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 01:18:48 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


Steve should take a look at my stills taken from the Aru-Bay videos if he hasnt already. I wonder if he has seen the red areas on the rocks and the workup I did on the bag and shoes observed adjacent to the fisherman's huts.


link: http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=108


Spock - I will send this off to the family...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sue on May 06, 2007, 01:25:35 PM

Here are still's I captured back in the day Of the what I called Shoes

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/Picture2026.jpg)


(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/Picture2258.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: justinsmama on May 06, 2007, 01:27:21 PM
Quote from: "BENDEX"
Well my friends brought me to a public hospital , Which are really disguting overhere . There I met with vice chief of police at my bed in the morning . ( there are not to many dutch guys around in my hometown so that certainly attracted the attention of the police. )And he offerded me the following deal , Or pass 2 years of juridical proceses , lawyers etc, or pay the police 200 usd to take care of him . So I paid  200 usd they kicked the hell out of this guy and let him go .

Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "BENDEX"
The stupid thing was that it was all about an discussion of Biljet of 100 false pesos (aporximatly 30 usd ) some guy accused me of paying him with false Bill a week earlier and treatend me , I called his bluf , the next thing I knew I was at the front of my house with kitchen knife in my back .



Bendex, that's terrible. Is the guy in jail now?


~Waving wildly at Bendex~ Too bad we can't we can't have that kind of deal with Paulus, Joran, K2, Freddy, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 01:27:40 PM
Klaas, a few updates for you:

1) Deepak chatted with this Croes person not just on the early morning of the 30th but also on the following couple nights. I think the "hands in my pants statement" was made Tuesday morning.

2) The Sloot home phone records "landline" were missing for May 29-30. The phone taps went into effect a few days after that and there are records for those calls. It is quite a mystery how the early phone records could have become "lost".

I will update with sources when I have them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:29:09 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Klaas, a few updates for you:

1) Deepak chatted with this Croes person not just on the early morning of the 30th but also on the following couple nights. I think the "hands in my pants statement" was made Tuesday morning.

2) The Sloot home phone records "landline" were missing for May 29-30. The phone taps went into effect a few days after that and there are records for those calls. It is quite a mystery how the early phone records could have become "lost".

I will update with sources when I have them.


Thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 01:31:41 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


Steve should take a look at my stills taken from the Aru-Bay videos if he hasnt already. I wonder if he has seen the red areas on the rocks and the workup I did on the bag and shoes observed adjacent to the fisherman's huts.


link: http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=108


Spock - I will send this off to the family...


Thanks Sleuth, I did that work a year ago, and the stills are quite convincing. If anyone hasn't looked them over they certainly should.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:34:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Klaas, a few updates for you:

1) Deepak chatted with this Croes person not just on the early morning of the 30th but also on the following couple nights. I think the "hands in my pants statement" was made Tuesday morning.

2) The Sloot home phone records "landline" were missing for May 29-30. The phone taps went into effect a few days after that and there are records for those calls. It is quite a mystery how the early phone records could have become "lost".

I will update with sources when I have them.


Thanks


From Deepaks June 29th statement ( I believe that chat conversation was May 30-th, not May 31st)

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.

On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*. The purpose of the chat traffic was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday. But I have understood that they do not have the chat traffic from that night but that they do have the one from Tuesday. I know the technical procedure, so if they have the one from Tuesday than they should be looking for the one from Sunday to Monday. If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES. Because that just worsened the situation. Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 01:42:31 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Front Page comment by Steve Holloway last night:

The aruba-bay video’s I believe tell a lot, the one with the painted rocks but mainly the one with the large piece of clear plastic in the pocket of the bridge. When you enlarge the video and pause it at 3 min. and 14 seconds you can see in the far right hand side of the video, a pair of shoes on the waters edge. The hotels are not far away in the distance and you can see foot tracks in the wet sand. This water channel looks like it could lead out to the ocean. This could have been the pick up place for a body. I have sent the links of the video’s to Jossy to give to the Dutch investigators. Let’s pray for any break to happen soon. Steve Holloway

Comment by Steve Holloway | May 5, 2007, 11:47 pm


I wonder if Steve is aware that bag was observed in a drainage basin, about 30 yards from the fisherman's huts...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 01:49:36 PM
I see the shoes.  

I never see things.  But I see shoes.

Back to wandering around my yard trying to figure out what to do next.

Is there a doctor or nurse handy?  A pharmacist would do.  I have a prescription question. TY

BBL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 01:50:32 PM
From Deepaks statement:

Quote
"But I have understood that they do not have the chat traffic from that night but that they do have the one from Tuesday. I know the technical procedure, so if they have the one from Tuesday than they should be looking for the one from Sunday to Monday. If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES."


Deepak was chatting with Croes again on Tuesday, either way it's a very incriminating statement to have made.

Quote
"the girl putting her hands in/down my pants"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 06, 2007, 01:50:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This is the same DEEPAK KALPOE that is seeking $800 million in damages from Dr. Phil for defamation of character.......

GMAB


LOVE WHAT YOU ARE all doing here guys.....BUTTTTT, will the Dutch ever look into such discrepancies in the book of Joran's and of what you are posting now....?? We can investigate and talk all we want but HOW DO WE (YOU GUYS) get this info to the people who need it to SLAM THESE GUYS?? Dayyyyyyyyummmm...GET THEM!! Somne will say, all in due time......well time is running out.....just DO IT!! Love u all!! Take care.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 06, 2007, 01:53:02 PM
Did Paulus whine that the people searching the house last week were reading the book and laughing?

Or was that my imagination?  

I betcha the Dutch guys are familiar with the book.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 01:53:58 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
From Deepaks statement:

Quote
"But I have understood that they do not have the chat traffic from that night but that they do have the one from Tuesday. I know the technical procedure, so if they have the one from Tuesday than they should be looking for the one from Sunday to Monday. If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES."


Deepak was chatting with Croes again on Tuesday, either way it's a very incriminating statement to have made.

Quote
"the girl putting her hands in/down my pants"


I still say that conversation took place on Monday the 30th


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 06, 2007, 01:59:08 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
I see the shoes.  

I never see things.  But I see shoes.

Back to wandering around my yard trying to figure out what to do next.

Is there a doctor or nurse handy?  A pharmacist would do.  I have a prescription question. TY

BBL



Peaches...please check e-mail...Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Katysmom on May 06, 2007, 02:27:27 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
I see the shoes.  

I never see things.  But I see shoes.

Back to wandering around my yard trying to figure out what to do next.

Is there a doctor or nurse handy?  A pharmacist would do.  I have a prescription question. TY

BBL


Peaches, I have a medical book on pills with their side effects, uses, and such if that would help


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 02:34:00 PM
Isn’t there a pretty good accounting of the early morning hours of Tuesday?  I remember them all finally leaving the HI area and Joran getting home in time to get ready and go to school.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 02:41:28 PM
Quote from: "Spock"

I wonder if Steve is aware that bag was observed in a drainage basin, about 30 yards from the fisherman's huts...


Yes.  They have that information.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 03:18:10 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
I see the shoes.  

I never see things.  But I see shoes.

Back to wandering around my yard trying to figure out what to do next.

Is there a doctor or nurse handy?  A pharmacist would do.  I have a prescription question. TY

BBL


If it is a simple one and not too detailed perhaps one of us can help.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 03:22:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Klaas, a few updates for you:

1) Deepak chatted with this Croes person not just on the early morning of the 30th but also on the following couple nights. I think the "hands in my pants statement" was made Tuesday morning.

2) The Sloot home phone records "landline" were missing for May 29-30. The phone taps went into effect a few days after that and there are records for those calls. It is quite a mystery how the early phone records could have become "lost".

I will update with sources when I have them.


Thanks


From Deepaks June 29th statement ( I believe that chat conversation was May 30-th, not May 31st)

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.

On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*. The purpose of the chat traffic was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday. But I have understood that they do not have the chat traffic from that night but that they do have the one from Tuesday. I know the technical procedure, so if they have the one from Tuesday than they should be looking for the one from Sunday to Monday. If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES. Because that just worsened the situation. Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney.


Any girl would have to be doped up or drunk out of her head to put her hand in his pants, but maybe they are accustomed to drugging someone to the point of putting their hand in Deepak's pants, in which case maybe for some it is a lethal dose.  It would have to be for me, for sure, but one thing about it, if the old saying about liar, liar pants on fire were valid, his breeches would be up in smoke.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 06, 2007, 03:29:59 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Spock"

I wonder if Steve is aware that bag was observed in a drainage basin, about 30 yards from the fisherman's huts...


Yes.  They have that information.

Thank you for passing everything along


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 03:31:16 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Spock"

I wonder if Steve is aware that bag was observed in a drainage basin, about 30 yards from the fisherman's huts...


Yes.  They have that information.

Thank you for passing everything along


We thank you, Spock, for taking the time to do this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 06, 2007, 03:32:07 PM
It is past the time.... wayyyy past the time....

the arrest warrants need to be signed and the Dutch and what is left of the ALE that is still honest need to go around and start rounding up all these people...

It is no wonder the police were laughing at Joran's book -- you see, they already know what happened and they probably found it funny as hell about all the new skitterdinging (convenient lies) Joran came up with this time....

I bet there is a direct correlation or nexus between the bribery corruption investigation and the Holloway investigation as probably a lot of the same names keep coming up... heh heh....

Now we see shoes ???? wowzers... skitterding that one away, Sporter.... size 14 was probably the only size shoe you could come up with when you planted it to cover your tracks you jerk....

If the shoe fits.... well there is a place where the sun don't shine


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 03:33:26 PM
I really need to consider professional help to wean me from my Natalee Holloway addiction.  I sat through the the entire service this morning and ... the words of the pastor went right over my head.  I could not stop thinking about Deepak's words in his June 13, 2005 declaration regarding his chat with John Charles Croes.  It did not make sense that he was referring the morning of May 30, 2005.

When Deepak's words in his June 13, 2005 declaration is compared with the words of his June 29, 2005 delaration ... I would assume that Deepak is referring to the chat he had with John Charles Croes on May 31, 2005 ... not May 30, 2005.

One way or another ... Deepak is admitting he attempted to obstruct the investigation.

Janet


MAY 31, 2005 - APRROXIMATELY 3:00 AM

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


After that Joran said to me: “Hey, look. If the police asks about it then we will just say we went away with the girl from Carlos & Charlies, that we did a bit of a road-trip, that he kissed and fingered her, that she fell asleep in the car, that we dropped her off at the Holiday Inn, that she had fallen down, that he had helped her up and that she walked off”. I said to Joran that it was OK, it was fine. Joran than said to me, let's go home. We then drove from the Wyndham Hotel to Joran's house.

At approximately 02:40, we had arrived at his house, but no-one was there. Joran phoned his father. The father had left with the police to meet with us at the Wyndham. Joran's father told him to stay at the house and that he was going to come back to the house now. Then borrowed Joran's phone and called Satish. I told Satish what Joran had told me. The conversation lasted about 3 to 4 minutes.

After about 10 minutes Joran phoned Satish. Joran verified with Satish if he remembered the story correctly. Joran talked to Satish about 3 minutes.


MAY 31, 2005 (?)

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 29, 2005


You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 03:36:04 PM
Janet and Spock - I've read that over several times now and I still believe Deepak's conversation with John Charles Croes, where he spoke about Natalee putting her hands down his pants was on May 30, 2005...not the 31st.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 03:36:41 PM
11:30 PM – Charles Croes GETS A PHONE CALL FROM A "MAJOR FRIEND" says he needs to help with a phone call made from one of his cell phones.  CHARLES CROES: then I made arrangements to go see him.


SO THIS TELLS US CHARLES CROES MET UP WITH THIS MAJOR FRIEND BEFORE HE MEETS UP WITH BETH.


11:30 -  MIDNIGHT - HE MEETS WITH HIS MAJOR FRIEND

Charles Croes has met his major friend, drove to Valero gas station and met and talked with Beth and listened to the phone call made to the U.S., drove to the Cabana area, drove to the beach area, drove to van der sloot home and arrived by 3:00 AM


Charles Croes meets with Beth at the Valero gas station at midnight:

VAN SUSTEREN: When you got to the gas station, did you talk to Beth?
C. CROES: Yes.


MIDNIGHT - 3:00 AM - THREE HOURS
Charles Croes left the Valero gas station, and went to the 5 minute drive to LaCabana area of beach and pays a boy $100 to take him to van der Sloot home.

He doesn't meet back up with Beth until approx 3:00 AM
I was with them on the first night they arrived to ARuba (looking for their daughter) from midnight until 5:30 AM and have kept in touch.
http://bb.visitaruba.com/showthread.php?p=18418

WONDER WHY HE TOOK THREE HOURS?
________________________________________________



COULD CHARLES CROES BE MORE INVOLVED WITH HIGHER-UPS? REMEMBER IN DAVE'S BOOK HE TALKED ABOUT GOING INTO DENNIS JACOBS OFFICE AND CHARLES CROES - THE CELL PHONE GUY WAS THERE
Author: charles (---.setardsl.aw)
Date: 03-05-05 22:02

Open letter to the Aruba Tourism Authority

CC Rory Arends - with hopes that you will pass this on to the correct person.

Not to long ago, it was a pleasure, now it is questionable at best.

I strongly urge those that belong to the ATA who have the trigger pulling power to make decisions, to do so and to do so to the benefit of the BB , To the ATA and (most importantly) to Aruba.

Registration is needed and some sort of monitoring system is a must. Give this some serious thought since the image of our island is involved.

Charles Croes

-----------------------------------

This does not apply to all that visit or that want to know what is going on. Nor does it apply to those that genuinly love Aruba and want to share.

Not to long ago, it was a pleasure, now it is questionable at best.

I strongly urge those that belong to the ATA who have the trigger pulling power to make decisions, to do so and to do so to the benefit of the BB , To the ATA and (most importantly) to Aruba.

Registration is needed and some sort of monitoring system is a must. Give this some serious thought since the image of our island is involved.

Charles Croes

-----------------------------------

After examining Joran's cell phone and computer, police discovered that someone tried to manipulate the clocks and calendars inside the devices so it would look like the messages were sent at different times.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/63316


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 06, 2007, 03:43:00 PM
Tamikosmom - this is just a flyby; on my way out. BUT - as someone pointed out a few pages ago, on the NEXT night - Monday night - J2K were busy with their casino outings and later, the Alabama posse. DK would not have been on his computer with J Croes on Monday night ... ?

Are you saying it was, or could have been, Tuesday night, that DK told J Croes about "hands down the pants"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
11:30 PM – Charles Croes GETS A PHONE CALL FROM A "MAJOR FRIEND" says he needs to help with a phone call made from one of his cell phones.  CHARLES CROES: then I made arrangements to go see him.


SO THIS TELLS US CHARLES CROES MET UP WITH THIS MAJOR FRIEND BEFORE HE MEETS UP WITH BETH.


11:30 -  MIDNIGHT - HE MEETS WITH HIS MAJOR FRIEND

Charles Croes has met his major friend, drove to Valero gas station and met and talked with Beth and listened to the phone call made to the U.S., drove to the Cabana area, drove to the beach area, drove to van der sloot home and arrived by 3:00 AM


Charles Croes meets with Beth at the Valero gas station at midnight:

VAN SUSTEREN: When you got to the gas station, did you talk to Beth?
C. CROES: Yes.


MIDNIGHT - 3:00 AM - THREE HOURS
Charles Croes left the Valero gas station, and went to the 5 minute drive to LaCabana area of beach and pays a boy $100 to take him to van der Sloot home.

He doesn't meet back up with Beth until approx 3:00 AM
I was with them on the first night they arrived to ARuba (looking for their daughter) from midnight until 5:30 AM and have kept in touch.
http://bb.visitaruba.com/showthread.php?p=18418

WONDER WHY HE TOOK THREE HOURS?
________________________________________________



COULD CHARLES CROES BE MORE INVOLVED WITH HIGHER-UPS? REMEMBER IN DAVE'S BOOK HE TALKED ABOUT GOING INTO DENNIS JACOBS OFFICE AND CHARLES CROES - THE CELL PHONE GUY WAS THERE
Author: charles (---.setardsl.aw)
Date: 03-05-05 22:02

Open letter to the Aruba Tourism Authority

CC Rory Arends - with hopes that you will pass this on to the correct person.

Not to long ago, it was a pleasure, now it is questionable at best.

I strongly urge those that belong to the ATA who have the trigger pulling power to make decisions, to do so and to do so to the benefit of the BB , To the ATA and (most importantly) to Aruba.

Registration is needed and some sort of monitoring system is a must. Give this some serious thought since the image of our island is involved.

Charles Croes

-----------------------------------

This does not apply to all that visit or that want to know what is going on. Nor does it apply to those that genuinly love Aruba and want to share.

Not to long ago, it was a pleasure, now it is questionable at best.

I strongly urge those that belong to the ATA who have the trigger pulling power to make decisions, to do so and to do so to the benefit of the BB , To the ATA and (most importantly) to Aruba.

Registration is needed and some sort of monitoring system is a must. Give this some serious thought since the image of our island is involved.

Charles Croes

-----------------------------------

After examining Joran's cell phone and computer, police discovered that someone tried to manipulate the clocks and calendars inside the devices so it would look like the messages were sent at different times.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/63316


Also, remember that at one point durring the summer of 2005 Charles Croes was arrested and in jail for a few days.  I've often wondered if that was a warning for him to keep his mouth shut.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 03:45:16 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
11:30 PM – Charles Croes GETS A PHONE CALL FROM A "MAJOR FRIEND" says he needs to help with a phone call made from one of his cell phones.  CHARLES CROES: then I made arrangements to go see him.


SO THIS TELLS US CHARLES CROES MET UP WITH THIS MAJOR FRIEND BEFORE HE MEETS UP WITH BETH.


11:30 -  MIDNIGHT - HE MEETS WITH HIS MAJOR FRIEND

Charles Croes has met his major friend, drove to Valero gas station and met and talked with Beth and listened to the phone call made to the U.S., drove to the Cabana area, drove to the beach area, drove to van der sloot home and arrived by 3:00 AM


Charles Croes meets with Beth at the Valero gas station at midnight:

VAN SUSTEREN: When you got to the gas station, did you talk to Beth?
C. CROES: Yes.


MIDNIGHT - 3:00 AM - THREE HOURS
Charles Croes left the Valero gas station, and went to the 5 minute drive to LaCabana area of beach and pays a boy $100 to take him to van der Sloot home.

He doesn't meet back up with Beth until approx 3:00 AM
I was with them on the first night they arrived to ARuba (looking for their daughter) from midnight until 5:30 AM and have kept in touch.
http://bb.visitaruba.com/showthread.php?p=18418

WONDER WHY HE TOOK THREE HOURS?
________________________________________________



COULD CHARLES CROES BE MORE INVOLVED WITH HIGHER-UPS? REMEMBER IN DAVE'S BOOK HE TALKED ABOUT GOING INTO DENNIS JACOBS OFFICE AND CHARLES CROES - THE CELL PHONE GUY WAS THERE
Author: charles (---.setardsl.aw)
Date: 03-05-05 22:02

Open letter to the Aruba Tourism Authority

CC Rory Arends - with hopes that you will pass this on to the correct person.

Not to long ago, it was a pleasure, now it is questionable at best.

I strongly urge those that belong to the ATA who have the trigger pulling power to make decisions, to do so and to do so to the benefit of the BB , To the ATA and (most importantly) to Aruba.

Registration is needed and some sort of monitoring system is a must. Give this some serious thought since the image of our island is involved.

Charles Croes

-----------------------------------

This does not apply to all that visit or that want to know what is going on. Nor does it apply to those that genuinly love Aruba and want to share.

Not to long ago, it was a pleasure, now it is questionable at best.

I strongly urge those that belong to the ATA who have the trigger pulling power to make decisions, to do so and to do so to the benefit of the BB , To the ATA and (most importantly) to Aruba.

Registration is needed and some sort of monitoring system is a must. Give this some serious thought since the image of our island is involved.

Charles Croes

-----------------------------------

After examining Joran's cell phone and computer, police discovered that someone tried to manipulate the clocks and calendars inside the devices so it would look like the messages were sent at different times.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/63316


Thank you, Kermit, for bringing this forward.  When I mentioned the manipulation of the clocks and calendars on computers, phones, I was given the "that's BS," line.  I heard this from an FBI agent and here it is in the National Enquirer, who probably got their information from same source.  It was about this time that FBI help was no longer wanted for they were too knowledgeable of the criminal activity of the VDS family and Charles Croes, et al.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 03:45:28 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Tamikosmom - this is just a flyby; on my way out. BUT - as someone pointed out a few pages ago, on the NEXT night - Monday night - J2K were busy with their casino outings and later, the Alabama posse. DK would not have been on his computer with J Croes on Monday night ... ?

Are you saying it was, or could have been, Tuesday night, that DK told J Croes about "hands down the pants"?


Personally, I believe it was May 30th and not May 31st.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 03:46:25 PM
Klass ... you have email.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 03:46:52 PM
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:08:08 PM
From Deepak's June 13, 2005 statement:

At approximately 02:40 uur (May 31, 2005), we had arrived at his house, but no-one was there. Joran phoned his father. The father had left with the police to meet with us at the Wyndham. Joran's father told him to stay at the house and that he was going to come back to the house now. I had turned up the volume of the music in my car to loud. At some point the woman that lives next door to Joran came out and called Joran over to her. The neighbor told Joran to turn the volume down of the music, she had a baby in the house and the music was too loud. Joran came over to me and told me to turn the volume down. Then borrowed Joran's phone and called Satish. I told Satish what Joran had told me. The conversation lasted about 3 to 4 minutes.

After about 10 minutes Joran phoned Satish. Joran verified with Satish if he remembered the story correctly. Joran talked to Satish about 3 minutes.

1.  Natalee went missing in the early hours of May 30, 2005
2.  Deepak was out at the casino with Joran the night of May 30, 2005
3.  Deepak was with Joran at Joran's house waiting for the police and the MB group to return at 2:40am the morning of May 31, 2005.

Conclusion:  Deepak COULD NOT have had that chat conversation with John Charles Croes in the early morning of May 31, 2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:08:43 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???


Maybe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 04:09:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Also, remember that at one point durring the summer of 2005 Charles Croes was arrested and in jail for a few days.  I've often wondered if that was a warning for him to keep his mouth shut.

This is exactly what I believe it was Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 04:14:00 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???

If Freddy put on Joran's shoes I don't think he would be walking too well in them.  That would be like Klaas walking in my shoes.  I'm a 10 1/2 and I believe Klaas is a 5.  If I was doing something bad I would want to make sure I have the right size on just in case I have to run.

Not that I would do anything bad :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 04:22:43 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???

If Freddy put on Joran's shoes I don't think he would be walking too well in them.  That would be like Klaas walking in my shoes.  I'm a 10 1/2 and I believe Klaas is a 5.  If I was doing something bad I would want to make sure I have the right size on just in case I have to run.

Not that I would do anything bad :lol:


Might explain them coming off and getting stuck in the mud..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 04:24:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From Deepak's June 13, 2005 statement:

At approximately 02:40 uur (May 31, 2005), we had arrived at his house, but no-one was there. Joran phoned his father. The father had left with the police to meet with us at the Wyndham. Joran's father told him to stay at the house and that he was going to come back to the house now. I had turned up the volume of the music in my car to loud. At some point the woman that lives next door to Joran came out and called Joran over to her. The neighbor told Joran to turn the volume down of the music, she had a baby in the house and the music was too loud. Joran came over to me and told me to turn the volume down. Then borrowed Joran's phone and called Satish. I told Satish what Joran had told me. The conversation lasted about 3 to 4 minutes.

After about 10 minutes Joran phoned Satish. Joran verified with Satish if he remembered the story correctly. Joran talked to Satish about 3 minutes.

1.  Natalee went missing in the early hours of May 30, 2005
2.  Deepak was out at the casino with Joran the night of May 30, 2005
3.  Deepak was with Joran at Joran's house waiting for the police and the MB group to return at 2:40am the morning of May 31, 2005.

Conclusion:  Deepak COULD NOT have had that chat conversation with John Charles Croes in the early morning of May 31, 2005.
I agree Klaas! ....Also in the above post, first Deepak calls Satish to make sure he has his "lies" straight. Then Joran phones Satish a few minutes later, to again make sure Satish has the "lies" straight.....Those three suspects worked VERY HARD to keep their "lies" straight. Sure, people tell fibs once in awhile. But the length these three went to to lie, and try to stick to those lies, was way beyond normal. Until they got caught, of course. They were trying TOO HARD to hide something, that is for sure. It is beautiful here and I have company...but you know how it is. I had to get my monkey fix! See you all later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:26:41 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???

If Freddy put on Joran's shoes I don't think he would be walking too well in them.  That would be like Klaas walking in my shoes.  I'm a 10 1/2 and I believe Klaas is a 5.  If I was doing something bad I would want to make sure I have the right size on just in case I have to run.

Not that I would do anything bad :lol:


My size 5 foot in my husbands size 10 1/2 shoe  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/foot.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 04:26:43 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???

If Freddy put on Joran's shoes I don't think he would be walking too well in them.  That would be like Klaas walking in my shoes.  I'm a 10 1/2 and I believe Klaas is a 5.  If I was doing something bad I would want to make sure I have the right size on just in case I have to run.

Not that I would do anything bad :lol:


Might explain them coming off and getting stuck in the mud..

Could be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 04:27:35 PM
Lazlo Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 12:25 pm    

frazerclan wrote:
Did he then go to get them and if he did what transpired?


No since Joran, Deepak, Satish and Freddy talked about it Freddy would buy new ones for Joran.

Much more in the book, I am not pleased with it at all. Sorry to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 04:28:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???

If Freddy put on Joran's shoes I don't think he would be walking too well in them.  That would be like Klaas walking in my shoes.  I'm a 10 1/2 and I believe Klaas is a 5.  If I was doing something bad I would want to make sure I have the right size on just in case I have to run.

Not that I would do anything bad :lol:


My size 5 foot in my husbands size 10 1/2 shoe  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/foot.jpg)


Klaas you are too funny :lol:  :lol:

Now try running in them :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:30:49 PM
SAN - I'm not a big fan of "jogging" in my own shoes, let alone shoes that come off my feet when I walk, LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 04:34:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SAN - I'm not a big fan of "jogging" in my own shoes, let alone shoes that come off my feet when I walk, LOL  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 04:36:59 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What if Freddy had been at the Sloots for the night.  He lived close so came over without shoes.  When something bad happened, he threw on Joran's shoes to help out.  Might explain why Freddy needs to buy Joran a pair.  Freddy lost or ruined the shoes???

If Freddy put on Joran's shoes I don't think he would be walking too well in them.  That would be like Klaas walking in my shoes.  I'm a 10 1/2 and I believe Klaas is a 5.  If I was doing something bad I would want to make sure I have the right size on just in case I have to run.

Not that I would do anything bad :lol:


My size 5 foot in my husbands size 10 1/2 shoe  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/foot.jpg)


Wow!! Look at those cute lil feet :) Freddy wearing Joran's shoe's could fit in that scenario..I don't see anyone else that would have that big of feet. The Kottenboes dont look that big of people. I dont think either of them looks to much over 6'1.

I am still confused why we were looking for one shoe size 14 in the beginning. Now we are looking for 2 shoes:(  We cant have one clear fact in this case can we? They must laugh there ass off at the spin and bs they throw into this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 04:41:07 PM
OT
Klaas

Has the walmart DVD player been working ok?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:41:43 PM
******* - all I know is that in the beginning we were told one shoe was found at the VDS house with blood or something on it.  They were looking for the match.  Then there was an APB put out for a pair of size 14 k-swiss, blue and white.  

Logically, Joran would wear a size 14 based upon his height.  If he actually wears a size 10 1/2 he must have a hard time balancing, IMO  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:42:25 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
OT
Klaas

Has the walmart DVD player been working ok?


Haven't used it alot but YES, it's been great so far.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 04:48:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - all I know is that in the beginning we were told one shoe was found at the VDS house with blood or something on it.  They were looking for the match.  Then there was an APB put out for a pair of size 14 k-swiss, blue and white.  

Logically, Joran would wear a size 14 based upon his height.  If he actually wears a size 10 1/2 he must have a hard time balancing, IMO  :lol:

Especially with that big head.

This is how I look at things.  If they said they were looking for one shoe it really must be a pair of sneakers that are missing.  I also believe if in fact they were missing a pair of sneakers they in fact have them in their possession.

Klaas do you know the date when this so called APB was put out.  Doesn't that make the ALE dumb.  They probably had a line around the block with missing sneakers that were found on the beach.

I have only heard the ALE put out two APBs.  One was for a white car and the other was for a sneaker :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 04:48:47 PM
Something had really been bothering me about the Dutch / KLPD investigations. I'm going on the record and say something is not right.

I also realize they are investigating the Namdar issue.

When the KLPD first went to the VDS home and began the search they brought the dogs and the poles to poke holes presumably. They ran the dogs over the hole to see if there was the scent of a decaying body under the soil.

The following day they brought the refrigeration truck in and all indications seem they were actually looking for the body of Natalee. As we know currently, no body was discovered.

What were the indications that Natalee may be in the garden that the KLPD felt the need to bring the refrigeration truck in? Without making any statements about the investigation, no one will probably ever know what exactly occurred in that search that allowed the KLPD to reach that determination.

The KLPD investigation could actually leave more questions than answers should there not be a re-arrest of the main suspects.

I don't think they would waste their time and effort bring a refrigeration truck in if they did not have some idea that they were going to find something of importance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 04:50:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - all I know is that in the beginning we were told one shoe was found at the VDS house with blood or something on it.  They were looking for the match.  Then there was an APB put out for a pair of size 14 k-swiss, blue and white.  

Logically, Joran would wear a size 14 based upon his height.  If he actually wears a size 10 1/2 he must have a hard time balancing, IMO  :lol:


I agree with 100% I remember it well..Just another thing we have on tape/records that shows devious police activity. Now Joran says he left them both on the beach and it goes unchallenged. I remember very clearly Dompig in a interview talking about exactly what you said. If thats the case someone should be arrested for obstruction of justice. Falsifying facts in a murder investigation.. I know fat chance!!

All I can think of was that the KIA thing where Joran puts on a pair of 10 1/2 was that it was staged. I dont think any Investigator could look at a pair of shoes and not immediately know the diffrence in shoe sizes. Even size 12 to size 14 in noticeable. So I dont think it was a misprinted  10 1/2 that was really size 14.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 04:50:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - all I know is that in the beginning we were told one shoe was found at the VDS house with blood or something on it.  They were looking for the match.  Then there was an APB put out for a pair of size 14 k-swiss, blue and white.  

Logically, Joran would wear a size 14 based upon his height.  If he actually wears a size 10 1/2 he must have a hard time balancing, IMO  :lol:


My hubby is 5'10" and wears a size 10 shoe, and he doesn't have unusually large feet.  :lol:

Joran would look very strange in a size 10.5 shoe, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 04:52:49 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - all I know is that in the beginning we were told one shoe was found at the VDS house with blood or something on it.  They were looking for the match.  Then there was an APB put out for a pair of size 14 k-swiss, blue and white.  

Logically, Joran would wear a size 14 based upon his height.  If he actually wears a size 10 1/2 he must have a hard time balancing, IMO  :lol:

Especially with that big head.

This is how I look at things.  If they said they were looking for one shoe it really must be a pair of sneakers that are missing.  I also believe if in fact they were missing a pair of sneakers they in fact have them in their possession.

Klaas do you know the date when this so called APB was put out.  Doesn't that make the ALE dumb.  They probably had a line around the block with missing sneakers that were found on the beach.

I have only heard the ALE put out two APBs.  One was for a white car and the other was for a sneaker :roll:


It was right around when they were draining the pond at the end of July 2005.  Remember, that's one of the things they were looking for.  Here is a transcript from August 2nd mentioning it:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/02/ng.01.html

GRACE: Welcome back, everybody. I`m Nancy Grace. We are live in Aruba. And the search that goes on for Natalee Holloway.

To Jossy Mansur, with "Diario" newspaper. Jossy, what`s the latest regarding the search for Joran Van Der Sloot`s shoes? Now, didn`t he tell police he lost them that night? How do you lose your shoes?

MANSUR: He did say that he lost two shoes, blue and white, tennis- type shoes. But I want to show you a picture, if I can.


Remember this??  Then Jossy showed that photo of Joran on the dance floor at CnC, but the photo was taken prior to Natalee even being in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 04:59:24 PM
Thats a good catch Klaas..So he wore boots the same night at C&C..I have seen the pics..Just wasnt sure if that was the same night..But he confirms it is..

MANSUR: Look at Joran`s shoes here in this photo.

GRACE: OK. Zoom in, Liz.

MANSUR: Do those look to you like blue or white or tennis-type shoes?

GRACE: No.

MANSUR: They look like boots, no?

GRACE: They look like boots. They look like work boots.

MANSUR: Brown boots. OK.

GRACE: Now, wait a minute...

MANSUR: He was wearing those at...

GRACE: Was that what he was wearing the night Natalee went missing?

MANSUR: Yes, ma`am. This is the photo -- this is a photo taken at Carlos and Charlie`s that night with other photos that we have.

You see, when all this became so complicated about the shoes, we went back in our files and we started to look at all of the pictures that we have. And we find some very interesting one, including this one that shows what he was wearing that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:01:49 PM
This photo of Joran was taken durring spring break 2005 which was prior to Natalee arriving in Aruba:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/cncjoransb.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranCnC2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:03:40 PM
******* - Jossy was wrong and retracted his statement later.  That was not the same time Natalee was there.  When it was shown on TV we all went nuts emailing NG and telling her Jossy was wrong, LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:03:59 PM
So Jossy had his facts wrong? He thought that was the same night didn't he?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:07:10 PM
Quote from: "*******"
So Jossy had his facts wrong? He thought that was the same night didn't he?

Yes, he did until we sent him and NG a million emails, lol

The confusion is we think Joran was wearing that same shirt when he went to CnC the night Natalee went missing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:09:14 PM
Ok..Yeh I remember that..lol

Well we have him in the video going into the casino and he is wearing tennis shoes.. I remember that Dompig statement the same as you..Wish I knew what show he said that on..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:11:34 PM
To be honest..No picture I have ever seen of Joran's feet ever jump out at me for being size 14. My brother wears that size and they are boats compared to my size 12


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:12:33 PM
Quote from: "*******"
To be honest..No picture I have ever seen of Joran's feet ever jump out at me for being size 14. My brother wears that size and they are boats compared to my size 12

Good point and I know what you mean.  Logically speaking though, he really should wear a size 14.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:13:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
So Jossy had his facts wrong? He thought that was the same night didn't he?

Yes, he did until we sent him and NG a million emails, lol

The confusion is we think Joran was wearing that same shirt when he went to CnC the night Natalee went missing.


I believe what Klass is saying is exactly what I recall and if memory serves, these pictures were made during spring break on Aruba, another time when the sporter was seeking out girls in his plaid shirt.  I think that shirt had a reason behind it.  Could it be so that he was easily recognizable with the PIMPS, that they knew him by his shirt, or did he just go nasty for days on end?

******* SAYS:
Wow!! Look at those cute lil feet Smile Freddy wearing Joran's shoe's could fit in that scenario..I don't see anyone else that would have that big of feet. The Kottenboes dont look that big of people. I dont think either of them looks to much over 6'1.

I am still confused why we were looking for one shoe size 14 in the beginning. Now we are looking for 2 shoes:( We cant have one clear fact in this case can we? They must laugh there ass off at the spin and bs they throw into this case.

TYLERGAL SAYS:
All my brothers are more than 6-2 and they all wear 13-1/2 upwards.  Their shoes have to be special ordered.  Neither is exceptionally large, just tall.  In fact, two of them are downright skinny.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:13:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This photo of Joran was taken durring spring break 2005 which was prior to Natalee arriving in Aruba:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/cncjoransb.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranCnC2.jpg)

Yes I remember that photo.  They are his dirty sneakers. He must wear those for his kidnapping night because he eventually drags his victim and leaves them on the beach so he doesn't want to get his good ones dirty.

Sort of like when you mow the lawn you have a special pair of sneakers because you don't want your good ones turning green.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:14:23 PM
These shoes look like Doc Marten's to my eye.  Something my kids were into back in the 1990s.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:15:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
To be honest..No picture I have ever seen of Joran's feet ever jump out at me for being size 14. My brother wears that size and they are boats compared to my size 12

Good point and I know what you mean.  Logically speaking though, he really should wear a size 14.


Yep, on a person of Joran's height, a size 14 would not look large in proportion to the rest of him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:15:45 PM
http://www.zappos.com/n/es/d/722478804/page/1.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:16:21 PM
Hard to say from that pic..If you look at the girl next to him she looks quite tall. Probably has good size feet for a girl :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:16:56 PM
Doc Marten's come in different colors of leather/suede and are easily stained, but they have a steel toe and if you were to kick someone with one of them, it could possibly kill them, cause "all that shit" to be found with them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:18:42 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranSchool.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 05:19:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'd like to still frame Joran's entrance into the casino to see if we could get a look at the shoes he was wearing.

I've tried and it's hard to tell.  He's definately wearing tennis shoes that are white.  

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/abcjoranshoes.jpg)


I didn't get any farther with my trial either.  I agree that it is white tennis shoes...

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Jorancasion.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:20:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
http://www.zappos.com/n/es/d/722478804/page/1.html


Tylergal - I know what you mean.  I'm undecided whether they are dirty tennis shoes or doc martin type boots/shoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:20:03 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
So Jossy had his facts wrong? He thought that was the same night didn't he?

Yes, he did until we sent him and NG a million emails, lol

The confusion is we think Joran was wearing that same shirt when he went to CnC the night Natalee went missing.


I believe what Klass is saying is exactly what I recall and if memory serves, these pictures were made during spring break on Aruba, another time when the sporter was seeking out girls in his plaid shirt.  I think that shirt had a reason behind it.  Could it be so that he was easily recognizable with the PIMPS, that they knew him by his shirt, or did he just go nasty for days on end?

******* SAYS:
Wow!! Look at those cute lil feet Smile Freddy wearing Joran's shoe's could fit in that scenario..I don't see anyone else that would have that big of feet. The Kottenboes dont look that big of people. I dont think either of them looks to much over 6'1.

I am still confused why we were looking for one shoe size 14 in the beginning. Now we are looking for 2 shoes:( We cant have one clear fact in this case can we? They must laugh there ass off at the spin and bs they throw into this case.

TYLERGAL SAYS:
All my brothers are more than 6-2 and they all wear 13-1/2 upwards.  Their shoes have to be special ordered.  Neither is exceptionally large, just tall.  In fact, two of them are downright skinny.

Or did he wear that particular shirt on the night he was going to kidnap a tourist and if someone did in fact have a picture of him he could say that wasn't that night it was another night.

I believe he wears those clothes for a reason especially the dirty sneakers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:20:40 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
To be honest..No picture I have ever seen of Joran's feet ever jump out at me for being size 14. My brother wears that size and they are boats compared to my size 12

Good point and I know what you mean.  Logically speaking though, he really should wear a size 14.


Yep, on a person of Joran's height, a size 14 would not look large in proportion to the rest of him.


I agree with you..I would be absolutely be amazed if he wore a size 11 or under.Even the pic where he had his feet up by the laptop dont look that huge..14 is pretty huge even compared to my size 12. I see it every day on my brothers feet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:21:21 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'd like to still frame Joran's entrance into the casino to see if we could get a look at the shoes he was wearing.

I've tried and it's hard to tell.  He's definately wearing tennis shoes that are white.  

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/abcjoranshoes.jpg)


I didn't get any farther with my trial either.  I agree that it is white tennis shoes...

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Jorancasion.jpg)


Thanks Sleuth - yes it's hard to get a good screen capture that is clear enough.  I took 6 new ones this morning and none were any better.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:22:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
These shoes look like Doc Marten's to my eye.  Something my kids were into back in the 1990s.

At first I thought they were boots.  But now I just think they are dirty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:22:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranSchool.jpg)


Now those look like size 13/14 or soo.. The kid next to him probably has size 10 or 11


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:24:52 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/shoecompare.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 06, 2007, 05:24:56 PM
The picture on the stage is interesting... the girl in flipflops next to him doesn't look like her feet are that much smaller than his. She can't be anything larger than a women's 10, so I am starting to come around to the idea of Joran having shoes smaller than 14.

Even in the award picture, the petite girl next to him does not appear to be dwarfed by him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:26:26 PM
Quote from: "sb"
The picture on the stage is interesting... the girl in flipflops next to him doesn't look like her feet are that much smaller than his. She can't be anything larger than a women's 10, so I am starting to come around to the idea of Joran having shoes smaller than 14.

Even in the award picture, the petite girl next to him does not appear to be dwarfed by him.


But look how tall that girl is on the stage..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 05:26:45 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Joranshoes.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Joranandtweetyshop.jpg)

I always feel bad for Tweety in this photo....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:26:46 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/shoecompare2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:27:24 PM
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:28:00 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "sb"
The picture on the stage is interesting... the girl in flipflops next to him doesn't look like her feet are that much smaller than his. She can't be anything larger than a women's 10, so I am starting to come around to the idea of Joran having shoes smaller than 14.

Even in the award picture, the petite girl next to him does not appear to be dwarfed by him.


But look how tall that girl is on the stage..


Yes, I think if she were standing up straight she would be almost as tall as Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:28:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/shoecompare.jpg)


By the looks of this photo I would say those shoes are at least size 12.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:29:21 PM
Quote from: "sb"
The picture on the stage is interesting... the girl in flipflops next to him doesn't look like her feet are that much smaller than his. She can't be anything larger than a women's 10, so I am starting to come around to the idea of Joran having shoes smaller than 14.

Even in the award picture, the petite girl next to him does not appear to be dwarfed by him.


SB, my brothers have big feet and brains (even that Florida Gator) and they always said "small feet are a sign of small thinking," (of course, that was so our mother felt proud of the purchase of special shoes) but I do believe his feet might be indicative of small thinking.  Anyone who resorts to the kinds of activities these PIMPS were into, is definitely a small thinker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 06, 2007, 05:29:48 PM
A 14 is really a very big shoe size, we generally don't realize how big it is. I suspect that klassend with her shoes ON could stick her feet into a size 14 men's shoe with no difficulty. They are big, MASSIVE shoes. They are probably more like 18 inches lond on the outside.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:29:51 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 05:30:53 PM
Quote from: Sleuth
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'd like to still frame Joran's entrance into the casino to see if we could get a look at the shoes he was wearing.

I've tried and it's hard to tell.  He's definately wearing tennis shoes that are white.  

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/abcjoranshoes.jpg)


This one might be a little clearer.  Just proves the white tennis shoes.
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Joranenterscasino.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:31:05 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I do remember a very old discussion of this  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 05:31:15 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Joranshoes.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Joranandtweetyshop.jpg)

I always feel bad for Tweety in this photo....


Ok..Once again those look pretty large..I am pretty convinced he wears size 13/ 14..Not that I wasnt before :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 05:32:38 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:33:11 PM
The MB ers did say when they looked at the C&C website, that recognized Joran "in the same clothes" as that night.  He must have changed after the casino IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:33:58 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The MB ers did say when they looked at the C&C website, that recognized Joran "in the same clothes" as that night.  He must have changed after the casino IMO.


That's what I'm thinking, Buckeye.  He went home in order to get into uniform.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:34:14 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:34:31 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:

That proves it then, you are not a monkey, LOLOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:34:42 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


I just did it and it works for me. Maybe it works betters with dwarfs.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:35:03 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


I tried it and my foot was shorter, but I am double-jointed so does that make a difference.  Hmmm, something to ponder.  When I go to a new doctor, they ask me if I am deformed from arthritis or double jointed. I never had arthritis, so I guess I am just deformed. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:35:29 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The MB ers did say when they looked at the C&C website, that recognized Joran "in the same clothes" as that night.  He must have changed after the casino IMO.


Exactly.  He changed into his pimping clothes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 06, 2007, 05:35:39 PM
Just from the pictures we have seen of him, I would guess he was an 11 or 12. 10 1/2 does seem a bit small but it might be possible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:36:00 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The MB ers did say when they looked at the C&C website, that recognized Joran "in the same clothes" as that night.  He must have changed after the casino IMO.


That's what I'm thinking, Buckeye.  He went home in order to get into uniform.


At least somewhere...home, Racquet Club....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:38:32 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Just from the pictures we have seen of him, I would guess he was an 11 or 12. 10 1/2 does seem a bit small but it might be possible.


One of my brothers is a CEO of a large shoe company and he judges people by the shoes they wear.  Of course, he would.  But if he looked at that picture with Joran, he would say his shoes are too tight.  No thumb's rest from the big toe to the end of the shoe.  Even I can tell that from just looking and I am no purveyor of people's feet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 06, 2007, 05:38:32 PM
BTW, a one-time criminal doesn't think up all these deceptions (clothes, shoes, changing dates & times on PC files, etc.) These are activities for the practiced slimeball.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:38:58 PM
Do you remember the other one....if you lie on the ground and spread out your arms....mark the end of your fingers....you are as tall as fingertip to fingertip...except maybe Tyler if she bends too much... :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:44:04 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:

I just tried it and my foot is the same size :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 05:45:57 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:


OK, I just redid.  My dimensions have not changed - my foot is still longer.  I tried to get a photo to prove, but it is really difficult to take a picture when in that position   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:47:11 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:


OK, I just redid.  My dimensions have not changed - my foot is still longer.  I tried to get a photo to prove, but it is really difficult to take a picture when in that position   :wink:

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:47:31 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:

I just tried it and my foot is the same size :lol:


I wear a size 4 shoe, and my wrist and inner arm are both a little over 8 inches long.

Reckon why that's not a size 8 shoe?  :?  :lol:
I mean, my foot isn't 4 inches long!  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:48:56 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:

I just tried it and my foot is the same size :lol:


I wear a size 4 shoe, and my wrist and inner arm are both a little over 8 inches long.

Reckon why that's not a size 8 shoe?  :?  :lol:
I mean, my foot isn't 4 inches long!  :roll:


No, no! that's wrong! I mean my foot, not my wrist.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 05:50:11 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


I just did it and it works for me. Maybe it works betters with dwarfs.  :lol:


I just did it and mine is a big toe bigger than my inner arm.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:51:09 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Do you remember the other one....if you lie on the ground and spread out your arms....mark the end of your fingers....you are as tall as fingertip to fingertip...except maybe Tyler if she bends too much... :lol:  :lol:


That worked for me in high school.  Have not tried it since, but two basketball players held my arms so that they would not bend. :?   In fact, they still remember that to this day.   :lol:   Everybody remembers my strange arms which do not look strange unless I try to hold them straight out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:51:26 PM
I can't wait for the new members to read what we are talking about :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 05:51:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:

That proves it then, you are not a monkey, LOLOL  :lol:


Hey Buckeye - should it be as long as the inside (from the inner crook of your elbow to the wrist), or the outer bend.  Mine is almost equal to the outer bend (like if I rest my foot and elbow on the desk)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:52:05 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


I just did it and it works for me. Maybe it works betters with dwarfs.  :lol:


I just did it and mine is a big toe bigger than my inner arm.   :?


You must be related to Sleuth.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:52:08 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:


redo  :lol:


OK, I just redid.  My dimensions have not changed - my foot is still longer.  I tried to get a photo to prove, but it is really difficult to take a picture when in that position   :wink:


Hmmmm....there are medical miracles.... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 05:53:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
I can't wait for the new members to read what we are talking about :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 05:53:11 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Just from the pictures we have seen of him, I would guess he was an 11 or 12. 10 1/2 does seem a bit small but it might be possible.


ok this foot size debate drives me nuts  :lol: going to post some photos but will likely delete them soon too, take too much bandwidth but also just don't want them out there forever.

THESE ARE ALL SIZE 14 FEET OF THE SAME MALE EXACTLY THE SAME HEIGHT AS JORAN

Please note that in each photo and each type of shoe, each looks different! Perspective plus the type  of shoe matters, also I am six feet tall and wear a size 10 yet son's former g/f is 5'7" and wears a size 9. In fact the girl on the stage next to Joran could be her double in terms of legs and feet.

{{removed photos}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:54:24 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:

That proves it then, you are not a monkey, LOLOL  :lol:


Hey Buckeye - should it be as long as the inside (from the inner crook of your elbow to the wrist), or the outer bend.  Mine is almost equal to the outer bend (like if I rest my foot and elbow on the desk)


I always thought inner....but...the primary research is a little rusty... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:56:04 PM
Noneusche - then what is your opinion?  Joran size 14 or 10 1/2?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 05:56:14 PM
If you think his feet look disproportionate to his body, then likely Joran isn't a size 14 - if you think they look proportionate to his body then I'd say odds are Joran doesn't wear a 10 1/2 !!!

Judge for yourself but also my brother is very slight build, 6'4" tall with extremely skinny feet and even he wears a size 13.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:57:10 PM
I have three DILs who are 5-6 and taller, and two of them wear size 5 shoes; the other wears an 8.  In fact, the tallest of the three is 5-10 and wears a size 5 shoe and 4 ring.  My oldest sister is 5-11, wears a size 10 dress and size 10 shoes but has a size 5 ring.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 05:57:11 PM
None

Would you ask him to put his right foot against his left forearm an report back....although, those forearm muscles might have shortened the limb... :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 05:57:14 PM
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 05:57:16 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "sb"
Just from the pictures we have seen of him, I would guess he was an 11 or 12. 10 1/2 does seem a bit small but it might be possible.


ok this foot size debate drives me nuts  :lol: going to post some photos but will likely delete them soon too, take too much bandwidth but also just don't want them out there forever.

THESE ARE ALL SIZE 14 FEET OF THE SAME MALE EXACTLY THE SAME HEIGHT AS JORAN

Please note that in each photo and each type of shoe, each looks different! Perspective plus the type  of shoe matters, also I am six feet tall and wear a size 10 yet son's former g/f is 5'7" and wears a size 9. In fact the girl on the stage next to Joran could be her double in terms of legs and feet.


His feet do look different in each photo.

I think he is a size 10 1/2 :lol:  :lol:

Just kidding.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:58:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:


And much, much, much better looking with his face filled in but we had no doubt about that.  He does clean up from those sports pictures REAL GOOD.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 05:58:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Noneusche - then what is your opinion?  Joran size 14 or 10 1/2?


ok look at that first photo in my post, I used that one to put it all into perspective with a standard door frame. I think his feet actually look the smallest in that one, but he's wearing Nikes.

I think Joran can't possibly wear a 10.5 shoe, not in US sizes. I think Joran wears somewhere between a 12 to 13 at the very LEAST.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 05:58:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:


I AGREE !!!!!!!!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 05:59:21 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Noneusche - then what is your opinion?  Joran size 14 or 10 1/2?


ok look at that first photo in my post, I used that one to put it all into perspective with a standard door frame. I think his feet actually look the smallest in that one, but he's wearing Nikes.

I think Joran can't possibly wear a 10.5 shoe, not in US sizes. I think Joran wears somewhere between a 12 to 13 at the very LEAST.


I think Joran's shoes look too tight in the sneaker shoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 05:59:39 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
None

Would you ask him to put his right foot against his left forearm an report back....although, those forearm muscles might have shortened the limb... :lol:  :lol:


ROFL I will ask, whether he will do it, I dunno  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 06:00:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:

Yes and much more muscular than Joran.  This is what a true sporter looks like.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 06, 2007, 06:02:15 PM
Hey monkeys..........the topic is shoe size...........
i don't care what size he is...lol...i'd just like to give sporter a good kick in the ass


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:02:23 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:

Yes and much more muscular than Joran.  This is what a true sporter looks like.


That depends on your definition of sporter. Maybe Joran's definition is  a lumpy boy who is a drunken rapist.  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 06:02:37 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Noneusche - then what is your opinion?  Joran size 14 or 10 1/2?


ok look at that first photo in my post, I used that one to put it all into perspective with a standard door frame. I think his feet actually look the smallest in that one, but he's wearing Nikes.

I think Joran can't possibly wear a 10.5 shoe, not in US sizes. I think Joran wears somewhere between a 12 to 13 at the very LEAST.


I think Joran's shoes look too tight in the sneaker shoes.

I think Joran's head is too big for his brain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 06:04:35 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:

Yes and much more muscular than Joran.  This is what a true sporter looks like.


That depends on your definition of sporter. Maybe Joran's definition is  a lumpy boy who is a drunken rapist.  8)

True.

There probably isn't a football helmet big enough for Joran to fit his fat head into.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:04:52 PM
ok buckeye, judge for yourself for he would destine me to see through blouses for punishment if he knew I was posting these  :lol:

forearm doe appear longer to me than his foot. Actually he has wide hands but not long fingers, wears I think a size 10 ring?

{{removed photos}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:06:00 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - FYI, he is much better looking than Joran even with his face blacked out, lol  :lol:

Yes and much more muscular than Joran.  This is what a true sporter looks like.

ya'll are too funny, don't swell his head up like the size of Joran's but I thank all of you for your kind words  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 06:06:41 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
ok buckeye, judge for yourself for he would destine me to see through blouses for punishment if he knew I was posting these  :lol:

forearm doe appear longer to me than his foot. Actually he has wide hands but not long fingers, wears I think a size 10 ring?

[removed photo]


None

I can't concentrate...I'm enjoying the pictures tooo much.....I have a really cute daughter..... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:08:08 PM
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 06:12:14 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:

I just thought of something.  Maybe Joran will copy that picture of your son and put his head on it :lol:  :lol: .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:13:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:

I just thought of something.  Maybe Joran will copy that picture of your son and put his head on it :lol:  :lol: .


He'd still look like Frankensloot - even with a body that isn't lumpy.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:13:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:

I just thought of something.  Maybe Joran will copy that picture of your son and put his head on it :lol:  :lol: .


OH NO  :shock: Klaas please delete them !!!!!!!!!!!!!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 06:13:31 PM
DELETE DELETE DELETE :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:14:13 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:

I just thought of something.  Maybe Joran will copy that picture of your son and put his head on it :lol:  :lol: .


He'd still look like Frankensloot - even with a body that isn't lumpy.  :lol:


BT how tall is your DH? What size shoe does he wear? Rick was 6' and wore a size 10.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 06, 2007, 06:14:23 PM
good to see u nonsey, san klass....bt buckeye et all......

i am going....am h-u-n-g-r-y :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 06:15:17 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
good to see u nonsey, san klass....bt buckeye et all......

i am going....am h-u-n-g-r-y :wink:

Hi FOM.  Enjoy your dinner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:15:29 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:

I just thought of something.  Maybe Joran will copy that picture of your son and put his head on it :lol:  :lol: .


He'd still look like Frankensloot - even with a body that isn't lumpy.  :lol:


BT how tall is your DH? What size shoe does he wear? Rick was 6' and wore a size 10.....


He's 5' 10" and wears a size 10.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 06:16:20 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PIMPS2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:16:25 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
good to see u nonsey, san klass....bt buckeye et all......

i am going....am h-u-n-g-r-y :wink:


Hi FOM. Bye FOM.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 06:17:10 PM
There has to be some type of science behind all this foot stuff, but I have never seen it.  I wear a 10 1/2 but I have to have a wide shoe.  My ring size is a 14 and that surprises people because my hand and fingers look very proportionate to my size.  Maybe there is no good rule to follow.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 06:19:13 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Do you remember the other one....if you lie on the ground and spread out your arms....mark the end of your fingers....you are as tall as fingertip to fingertip...except maybe Tyler if she bends too much... :lol:  :lol:


This one works   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:19:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PIMPS2.gif)


good to see you too FOM and take care!

Klaas ROFL  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 06:20:33 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/discopartytAruba2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:20:36 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There has to be some type of science behind all this foot stuff, but I have never seen it.  I wear a 10 1/2 but I have to have a wide shoe.  My ring size is a 14 and that surprises people because my hand and fingers look very proportionate to my size.  Maybe there is no good rule to follow.....


I think that's a wise stance Easy, I also think joran's foot does not look disproportionate but they also at times look "stuffed" into his shoes as tyler said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:23:01 PM
Klaas  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I actually liked the one yesterday of Joran in the queen's best blue hat a LOT  :lol:  :lol:

looking back thru photos I am sitting here laughing, I found one of a mom at a bonfire their senior year when she had way too much to drink and was dancing around the fire while we all tried not to laugh at her sweet self  :lol:  :lol: but Rick took her photo  :oops:

poor thing  :oops: it builds a strong case against drinking too much !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 06, 2007, 06:23:37 PM
Remember when we were looking at photos of Joran long ago-someone mentioned it looked like he had hair plugs?  And I am wondering if he doesn't have some sort of condition that affects growth?  He is tall, but not really proportioned...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 06:24:40 PM
I like this one because it fits their personalities so well:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranGuidoSkate.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:25:58 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Remember when we were looking at photos of Joran long ago-someone mentioned it looked like he had hair plugs?  And I am wondering if he doesn't have some sort of condition that affects growth?  He is tall, but not really proportioned...


I think it's that square head he has, just like Anita with his hairline up so far? At times when his hair has that spiked edge look it does resemble plugs. I think he has a larger frame than son but also weighs much more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:26:51 PM
Klaas  :lol:  :lol: don't you wonder if Guido and Joran have seen that one?

I bet it's not their fave  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 06:30:54 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Remember when we were looking at photos of Joran long ago-someone mentioned it looked like he had hair plugs?  And I am wondering if he doesn't have some sort of condition that affects growth?  He is tall, but not really proportioned...


He had a growth burst for some reason.  He is a head taller than Paulus and twice as tall as Anita.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 06:31:57 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:

That proves it then, you are not a monkey, LOLOL  :lol:


Hey Buckeye - should it be as long as the inside (from the inner crook of your elbow to the wrist), or the outer bend.  Mine is almost equal to the outer bend (like if I rest my foot and elbow on the desk)


This looks out of proportion and off-color because the camera is so close....Elbo and heel are on the desk in front of me.  Camera is about 3 inches away...lol

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Footcompare.jpg)

Now Buckeye needs to redo the Duct Tape test, and BTGirl the "can you fit in a garbage bag" test.   Then try taking photos of yourself when taped up or in the garbage bag  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 06, 2007, 06:33:55 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, your foot is as long as your inner arm, wrist to bend at elbow...maybe we should compare forearms... :lol:


I think Klaas actually tried that once before.  :lol:


I actually did try that.... my foot was longer than my inner arm... :wink:

That proves it then, you are not a monkey, LOLOL  :lol:


Hey Buckeye - should it be as long as the inside (from the inner crook of your elbow to the wrist), or the outer bend.  Mine is almost equal to the outer bend (like if I rest my foot and elbow on the desk)


This looks out of proportion and off-color because the camera is so close....Elbo and heel are on the desk in front of me.  Camera is about 3 inches away...lol

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Footcompare.jpg)

Now Buckeye needs to redo the Duct Tape test, and BTGirl the "can you fit in a garbage bag" test.   Then try taking photos of yourself when taped up or in the garbage bag  :lol:


Gosh...I hope none of us are called to testify... :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 06:34:06 PM
Sleuth what pretty toenails  :lol: we know you really are a girl now  :D

 :lol:

back to work for me, sorry if I broke up the train of thought but I do truly believe Joran's foot is larger than any 10.5 size shoe !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 06, 2007, 06:39:23 PM
Just caught up....I've always thought that Joran would wear larger than 10.5 shoe size....just watching my sons & their friends grow up, going through sports & talking to the other moms...

Am I wrong, but wouldn't Koen be one of Joran's larger friends by height, weight...maybe even shoe size?   Maybe even a 14, if that size has any truth or validity in this case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:41:58 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Now Buckeye needs to redo the Duct Tape test, and BTGirl the "can you fit in a garbage bag" test.   Then try taking photos of yourself when taped up or in the garbage bag  :lol:


I think hubby might actually like the idea of stuffing me in a garbage bag. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 06:45:08 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/BayCityRollers3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 06, 2007, 06:48:07 PM
Wonder if Joran has history of steroid use/abuse?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:51:28 PM
Too funny, Rob.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 06:51:42 PM
Just doing a drive by but:

Have we ever verified Joran's height?  He is usually photographed with those of diminutive stature and I have always thought he looks only about 6'2" not 6'5" as he does not tower over other Caucasians when photographed with them.  The Dutch interrogator stated on the record that the 10.5 fit Joran fine with regard to toe size having verified this by having Joran put the shoe back on and feeling.  Joran tried to get his attorney to stop this but his attorney did not stop it and it is in the record.  If he really wore a Size 14, he would destroy a pair of 10.5 or destroy his feet one or the other.  Jossy seemed pretty certain the Dutch investigator had caught him lying about the Size 14.

Our nose, ears and feet continue to grow all our lives and he is still very young.

Klaas, somewhere you have those yellow Dr Marten looking boots or shoes up close and they are not what they appear from a distance but don't suppose it is all that important.  We discussed them at length once and did get close up of them.  More like stained sports shoes than what they look like from a distance.  Not really important and will come up again if it is, just BOLO when riffling through your files for the close up of them.

Deepak was supposedly at the casino or the Sloots Tuesday night and could not have been chatting with JC Croes.  It was Monday night, the night Natalee disappeared that he was trying to "mess up" the investigation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 06:55:34 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Just caught up....I've always thought that Joran would wear larger than 10.5 shoe size....just watching my sons & their friends grow up, going through sports & talking to the other moms...

Am I wrong, but wouldn't Koen be one of Joran's larger friends by height, weight...maybe even shoe size?   Maybe even a 14, if that size has any truth or validity in this case?


Koen was the only person that came to mind or his brother. I looked at pics though and he isnt that tall. Mabee 6'1. It is possible momma's boy could wear size 14 though..Dont have to be 6'4 to wear that size.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 06:56:28 PM
Joran's foot print on the beach. I doubt this is a size 14.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Bigfootprintonbeach.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 06:56:47 PM
I dont think Joran is 6'5..Maybee 6'3-6'4


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 06:57:16 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Too funny, Rob.  :lol:
 did you see all the big feet in sneakers too?  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:57:47 PM
Quote from: "*******"
I dont think Joran is 6'5..Maybee 6'3-6'4


From where did we get the original information about his height? Does anyone remember?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 06:58:57 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Too funny, Rob.  :lol:
 did you see all the big feet in sneakers too?  :D


I think the space aliens have invaded and caused a plague of big feet in sneakers.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 06:59:06 PM
Jossy did a whole article just on the shoe size being 10.5.  We usually take his word for things but for some reason not on the shoe size.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 06:59:26 PM
BTW:I see Tim Miller and TES is on the ground in Cali..They are searching for April Pretzer..

You ever been out to Calico ghost town Klaas? On the way to vegas/loughlin..It is absolutely out in the middle of the mojave..I hope he finds her!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 06:59:50 PM
Hey Joran!!!!!!!!

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Footgivesthefinger1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 07:00:24 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Wonder if Joran has history of steroid use/abuse?

You know I think he could have.

My nephew has a friend who I think uses them and I recently saw him and said what is wrong with his head.  I told my sister and she happened to see him a few days later and she was like this :shock: .  This kid is going to be 18 years old.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 07:01:26 PM
Quote from: "*******"
I dont think Joran is 6'5..Maybee 6'3-6'4


I agree, *******, I'd have to witness him measured to believe he is 6'5".  Perhaps everyone just takes his word for that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 07:01:44 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Joran's foot print on the beach. I doubt this is a size 14.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Bigfootprintonbeach.jpg)


I think that one belongs to Anita.   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 07:02:39 PM
OK- this is probably a fairer comparison.  The camera is closer in one, but check Nonesuche's writing on the screen to tell the length.  Heel and elbow both on the desk, up against the screen.

I've completed my analysis for the season.  We have a whole lotta monkeys we can call on for future tests   :lol:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Footcompare.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 07:03:10 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Hey Joran!!!!!!!!

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Footgivesthefinger1.jpg)


LOL!! You know he reads here..It's prolly the first time he doesnt know exactly what is goin on..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 07:04:16 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
OK- this is probably a fairer comparison.  The camera is closer in one, but check Nonesuche's writing on the screen to tell the length.  Heel and elbow both on the desk, up against the screen.

I've completed my analysis for the season.  We have a whole lotta monkeys we can call on for future tests   :lol:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Footcompare.jpg)


Are ya gonna have to clean toe and finger prints off your screen now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 07:05:17 PM
Quote from: "*******"
BTW:I see Tim Miller and TES is on the ground in Cali..They are searching for April Pretzer..

You ever been out to Calico ghost town Klaas? On the way to vegas/loughlin..It is absolutely out in the middle of the mojave..I hope he finds her!!


I've been to Calico.  Yes, it is in the middle of nowhere...

Speaking of Calicos, where is CAT?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 07:05:33 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Rob"
Joran's foot print on the beach. I doubt this is a size 14.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Bigfootprintonbeach.jpg)


I think that one belongs to Anita.   :P


Hmmm....if it was Anita's, you'd think there'd be a see-through blouse in the picture somewhere.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 07:05:51 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Are ya gonna have to clean toe and finger prints off your screen now?


I was thinking the same thing    :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 06, 2007, 07:06:27 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Rob"
Joran's foot print on the beach. I doubt this is a size 14.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Bigfootprintonbeach.jpg)


I think that one belongs to Anita.   :P


Hmmm....if it was Anita's, you'd think there'd be a see-through blouse in the picture somewhere.  :lol:


It IS there - you are just seeing through it   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 07:06:28 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "*******"
BTW:I see Tim Miller and TES is on the ground in Cali..They are searching for April Pretzer..

You ever been out to Calico ghost town Klaas? On the way to vegas/loughlin..It is absolutely out in the middle of the mojave..I hope he finds her!!


I've been to Calico.  Yes, it is in the middle of nowhere...

Speaking of Calicos, where is CAT?


email me and I'll tell you.  :wink:

sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 07:12:51 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "*******"
BTW:I see Tim Miller and TES is on the ground in Cali..They are searching for April Pretzer..

You ever been out to Calico ghost town Klaas? On the way to vegas/loughlin..It is absolutely out in the middle of the mojave..I hope he finds her!!


I've been to Calico.  Yes, it is in the middle of nowhere...

Speaking of Calicos, where is CAT?

Yes, I have been there, once many years ago.  I'm not much of a desert person though  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 07:19:09 PM
IWABWU posted this at BFN

From reading various things I've thought there was a pair and an half missing.

The pair he had on the night/morning Natalee disappears.  

The 'half' came from ALE getting one shoe and not the other.  Perhaps these were the shoes he had on Monday night at the 'casino'?

'One' shoe comments from the Globe, January 23, 2006, pages 10 & 11.  This is the issue with a mock up of a blood spattered K-Swiss on the cover.

"Sources believe the tennis shoe was found near the abandoned, shallow grave..."

"Insiders close to the investigation say cops think the grave briefly contained Natalee's body before it was dumped elsewhere - possibly in the nearby shark infested ocean."

"Sources disclose that the size 14 shoe had blood on it.  One theory is that Joran may have removed his white $75 sneakers during Natalee's abduction and murder - and that her blood dripped onto one of them!"

"Sources say the shoe is currently being analyzed by forensic experts in Holland to see if the blood matches Natalee's DNA.  They note that the explosive discovery could finally nail 6-foot-5 Joran and reveal what really happened to Natalee..."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 07:20:06 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Rob"
Joran's foot print on the beach. I doubt this is a size 14.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Bigfootprintonbeach.jpg)


I think that one belongs to Anita.   :P


Hmmm....if it was Anita's, you'd think there'd be a see-through blouse in the picture somewhere.  :lol:


I did find her clogs... they were on the beach!

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/ClogFeet2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 07:41:21 PM
oops.

should be:

(http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/6746/joranshoecomparisonzw0.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 07:42:21 PM
Klassend is faster than a speeding bullet.

Please delete the double post.

Hey, isn't there a post - let me see if I have it and I'll be back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 07:43:32 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Klassend is faster than a speeding bullet.

Please delete the double post.

Hey, isn't there a post - let me see if I have it and I'll be back.


LOLOL - just deleted the dup


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 07:45:34 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
oops.

should be:

(http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/6746/joranshoecomparisonzw0.jpg)


Bah..Those do not look like size 10 1/2 at all..At least a 12 if not bigger..IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 07:51:33 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
:lol: honestly since saban's arrival the muscles are bigger too but San can tell you as we discussed today, he's single so bring her on  :lol:

I just thought of something.  Maybe Joran will copy that picture of your son and put his head on it :lol:  :lol: .


Yes.   That sounds like something Anita's soft sporter would do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 07:52:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PIMPS2.gif)


That is still my favorite.  Don't they look like the gang that cannot shoot straight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 07:54:55 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Remember when we were looking at photos of Joran long ago-someone mentioned it looked like he had hair plugs?  And I am wondering if he doesn't have some sort of condition that affects growth?  He is tall, but not really proportioned...


He had a growth burst for some reason.  He is a head taller than Paulus and twice as tall as Anita.


Precocious puberty.


Title: Size 14
Post by: IBE on May 06, 2007, 07:58:00 PM
Quote from: "sb"
BTW, a one-time criminal doesn't think up all these deceptions (clothes, shoes, changing dates & times on PC files, etc.) These are activities for the practiced slimeball.


I am several pages behind in reading but wanted to quote this.

Yes, but remember Joran's hobby is Criminal Law. He probably thinks he got away with the perfect crime.

Shoe size: the smartest, well educated, European born man (2nd cousin to the Czar on one side of the family and 2nd cousin to the ruler of Germany on the other) I was ever in love with :lol: was 6'5" and he wore huge shoes that were 14 and had a huge workable brain to go with it :roll:

It's been 13 yrs since we broke up but still think about him. I do remember his shoes; how large they were compared to my 8's.

I tried the foot:elbow thing. My arms and legs are a tad longer than they should be..long sleeve sweaters are always about 1 1/2 inches short. It came out that way in the foot:inner arm test. 1 1/2 inches the inner arm is longer than my foot size. Gee to you to be a pretzel to do this!

Now we have another reason to look a male's size of their feet!! or was it hands :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 08:00:23 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PIMPS2.gif)


That is still my favorite.  Don't they look like the gang that cannot shoot straight!


Looks more like Night of the living dead..Pimp edition.. :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 06, 2007, 08:01:18 PM
My my you guys have had an interesting evening..  lol

Just logged on after having p.c.problems and read the last hours' worth of posts.... good thing I know you guys.   :lol:  (otherwise I might think you'd lost your minds!)

Thanks for the laughs.  Sleuth - love the nail color.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 08:01:45 PM
This is an email from Charles Croes. Ain't it interesting that he states he signed a non-disclosure agreement.


From: Fastphones Aruba
[Add to Address Book]
To: {{removed your email address}}
Subject: Re: Just wondering…
Date: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:36:55 PM [View Source]

I have signed a NDA agreement with two different police departments to not discuss this further.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 08:02:08 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
My my you guys have had an interesting evening..  lol

Just logged on after having p.c.problems and read the last hours' worth of posts.... good thing I know you guys.   :lol:  (otherwise I might think you'd lost your minds!)

Thanks for the laughs.  Sleuth - love the nail color.


But, Beans - we're all so perfectly sensible!  :lol:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 08:02:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "*******"
BTW:I see Tim Miller and TES is on the ground in Cali..They are searching for April Pretzer..

You ever been out to Calico ghost town Klaas? On the way to vegas/loughlin..It is absolutely out in the middle of the mojave..I hope he finds her!!


I've been to Calico.  Yes, it is in the middle of nowhere...

Speaking of Calicos, where is CAT?

Yes, I have been there, once many years ago.  I'm not much of a desert person though  :wink:


Been there, too.  Years ago.  Near Barstow, I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 08:02:51 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PIMPS2.gif)


That is still my favorite.  Don't they look like the gang that cannot shoot straight!


Deepak looks a little pasty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 06, 2007, 08:05:25 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Frijole"
My my you guys have had an interesting evening..  lol

Just logged on after having p.c.problems and read the last hours' worth of posts.... good thing I know you guys.   :lol:  (otherwise I might think you'd lost your minds!)

Thanks for the laughs.  Sleuth - love the nail color.


But, Beans - we're all so perfectly sensible!  :lol:  8)


I know!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 08:05:39 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PIMPS2.gif)


That is still my favorite.  Don't they look like the gang that cannot shoot straight!


Deepak looks a little pasty.


Pasty Patsy. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 08:09:10 PM
(http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/2194/joran1fs5.jpg)

Paulus looks like he wears 10 1/2 and Joran a 14.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 08:09:51 PM
Good example Kermit - I agree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 08:10:04 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
(http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/2194/joran1fs5.jpg)

Paulus looks like he wears 10 1/2 and Joran a 14.


That's a big foot on the PIMP.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 08:11:10 PM
(http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/955/joranbyhispoolondecbreaak6.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 08:12:05 PM
Prompt medical evaluation of precocious puberty is important to rule out an underlying cause and begin treatment. Although treatment varies depending on the cause, it often includes medication to delay further development. In addition to medical treatment, children with precocious puberty may also benefit from psychological counseling to deal with the effects of being more sexually developed than their peers


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 08:13:48 PM
His legs look like big old sausages that have not been tied off.  He really does not have a lot of hair on his legs for someone with precocious puberty.  My DH had precocious puberty and he is and has always been quite hairry on his legs and chest.  I hope he does not read this.  He will be furious.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 08:15:38 PM
be back in a bit - gotta cook some flies for Miss Piggy.


Oh and Rob,

I completely agree with you.

This is not just about sporter and the man who considers himself like Albert Camus - there is collusion of gov't and hoteliers.

Do you or anyone know if Ben King was still working in the prosecutors office when Paulus was there - during the time the kid was in the Kia? July 2005?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 06, 2007, 08:15:59 PM
hi all
  What an interesting evening.. LMAO Trying hard to catch up.. but my PC is slower the heck for some reason. and YEP  I clear my cookies and all that happy crap!
 Sleuth  What cute tootsies   :wink:

ROB I am now traumatized at the BayCityRollers  :shock:
 I cant get SATURDAY NIGHT song out of my head. and thats almost as bad if not worse then Its a Small World..  LOL

BT  ROFL about the gabrage bag.. Ummmmmm. try being married to someone who owns heavy equipment  :shock:  :shock:  Thats skeery.. Cubbee and I arei n the same  boa,. and have had many discussion about that offline.. LOL


 And  :cry:  :cry:  I missed Bendex's debut. Glad to hear he is doing well and recovering .
 Now this post I am sure will take forever to be submitted.. cause I dunno why my DSL is so firring slowe .  Pfttttttttttttttttttttt


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 08:16:16 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
(http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/955/joranbyhispoolondecbreaak6.jpg)


Anita needs some new deck furniture. You'd think someone artistic could come up with something better than that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 08:16:29 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
His legs look like big old sausages that have not been tied off.  


RIBBIT

too funny tylergal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 08:18:42 PM
Kermit - any idea who this guy is?  He was at the VDS house too durring their press conference when Joran was released.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Guyseenwiththesloots.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 08:19:13 PM
brb dinner time


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 06, 2007, 08:20:00 PM
I have always loved Kermit,he got me my first A in college.Your toes are nice and the color is nice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 08:20:56 PM
Hi Angie!  :D

You probably shouldn't ask your hubby if he wants to test out any heavy equipment on you.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 08:22:11 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I have always loved Kermit,he got me my first A in college.Your toes are nice and the color is nice.


Sleuth better watch out. I'm thinking tigers probably nibble toes.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sue on May 06, 2007, 08:25:08 PM
No way is this  10 1/2  NO WAY


(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/89011309_9d954afab6.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 08:25:10 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Jorangetsouttajail2-1.jpg)

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/NewsReporter3.jpg)

He is also the guy getting kicked by Anita...

I have a guess who he is, but I'm not going to say.. because I have no idea if I am right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Red on May 06, 2007, 08:25:59 PM
New FP Post ...

Aruban Justice … 6 Years Is the Punishment in Aruba for the Mutilation and Burning of Pit Bulls Body


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/05/06/aruban-justice-6-years-is-the-punishment-in-aruba-for-the-mutilation-and-burning-of-pit-bulls-body/

Justice is supposed to be blind, not foolish.

One really begins to wonder when they see such justice handed out for such heinous crimes whether it makes any difference whether Aruban officials ever bother to prosecute or find anyone guilty of a crime.
 
...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Patriot on May 06, 2007, 08:29:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - any idea who this guy is?  He was at the VDS house too durring their press conference when Joran was released.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Guyseenwiththesloots.jpg)


I'm not sure, but I think it's the same guy Anita is kicking in that other photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 06, 2007, 08:31:42 PM
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/shoesizer.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 08:33:23 PM
Wait a second.. I just noticed something about those two pictures... look at the top one where Joran is getting outta jail.. look directly over Anita's shoulder and there is a guy wearing a tie. He looks like an Attorney..

Then look at the other picture that was taken a short time later.. he is not wearing the tie and has changed his shirt. It's the same guy.

Are these photos taken on the same afternoon?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 08:34:57 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Wait a second.. I just noticed something about those two pictures... look at the top one where Joran is getting outta jail.. look directly over Anita's shoulder and there is a guy wearing a tie. He looks like an Attorney..

Then look at the other picture that was taken a short time later.. he is not wearing the tie and has changed his shirt. It's the same guy.

Are these photos taken on the same afternoon?


I think the lower pic is when Paulus got outta jail, and that same guy that Anita was kicking was there too.... or am I wrong on this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 08:37:45 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
No way is this  10 1/2  NO WAY


(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/89011309_9d954afab6.jpg)


That has got to be a bunch of trashy girls in Aruba.  Anyone that lies down with a dog is going to get up with fleas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 08:40:23 PM
Quote from: "Red"
New FP Post ...

Aruban Justice … 6 Years Is the Punishment in Aruba for the Mutilation and Burning of Pit Bulls Body


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/05/06/aruban-justice-6-years-is-the-punishment-in-aruba-for-the-mutilation-and-burning-of-pit-bulls-body/

Justice is supposed to be blind, not foolish.

One really begins to wonder when they see such justice handed out for such heinous crimes whether it makes any difference whether Aruban officials ever bother to prosecute or find anyone guilty of a crime.
 
...


Typical of Aruba.  So Pitbull died of a drug overdose, his friends decide to cover it up by mutilating him and setting him on fire.  Makes alot of sense to me.  Or, could it be Pitbull was a message to others?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 08:44:37 PM
O/T this is a video of  UFO. I have been taking stills of it since I first saw the video on around 4-18-2007.

Check this out

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-398836828825804273&hl=en

Sorry to be OT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 08:49:03 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
O/T this is a video of  UFO. I have been taking stills of it since I first saw the video on around 4-18-2007.

Check this out

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-398836828825804273&hl=en

Sorry to be OT


That is very cool - is there any chance it's a fake?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 06, 2007, 08:51:45 PM
well the mechanics are wrong in the picture,of jvds.I wear 11 's and i think he lies,a novel idea.I thought the forearm measure was for some other part.back to my nap at the old folks home


Title: Calico
Post by: IBE on May 06, 2007, 08:52:48 PM
Quote from: "*******"
BTW:I see Tim Miller and TES is on the ground in Cali..They are searching for April Pretzer..

You ever been out to Calico ghost town Klaas? On the way to vegas/loughlin..It is absolutely out in the middle of the mojave..I hope he finds her!!


Oh I hope this turns out well!

I used spend time talking to the lady scientist who ran the museum and dig near the dump there... off the freeway, north of the V to Laughlin and north to Vegas.. to the left and N of the V, sort of up the mountains, north, from the town. Leaky said the oldest remains of man would be found there. They have found rock tools but no bones. He was scheduled to come there, but he died.

I have done 4x4ing all around and in those mountains. It is not easy. Too many places to do icky things, if so inclined.

Still behind in my pages. sorry


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 08:52:56 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
well the mechanics are wrong in the picture,of jvds.I wear 11 's and i think he lies,a novel idea.I thought the forearm measure was for some other part.back to my nap at the old folks home


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: MsVada on May 06, 2007, 08:53:22 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kermit"
(http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/955/joranbyhispoolondecbreaak6.jpg)


Anita needs some new deck furniture. You'd think someone artistic could come up with something better than that.


Yes I did,  and I also noticed the beer bottle in the cup holder of his chair.  a Rolling Rock or Heiniken perhaps??

what a slug sucking dirtbag!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 08:54:38 PM
i wear size 10

im 5'9"

joranjerk is not a size 10 or a 10.5


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 08:55:22 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Rob"
O/T this is a video of  UFO. I have been taking stills of it since I first saw the video on around 4-18-2007.

Check this out

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-398836828825804273&hl=en

Sorry to be OT


That is very cool - is there any chance it's a fake?


I dont think its fake.. the speed it displays at the end is from another world. I have some screen grabs of it and there looks to be an exhaust system on the the under side that is made out of some type of tubing. And it has some type of ailerons that actuate like nothing I have ever seen ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 08:55:52 PM
Hey..Just curious about the pic of the 3 that bashed in pitbulls head,cut off his legs and burned him..

These 3 look more like actors to you? They probably got them on drug charges but promised them lighter sentences if they agreed to take the rap for what happened to pitbull..Whatya think?

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/12/22/noticiadidia/news4.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 08:57:11 PM
Case of Natalee: report shows formal deceit
Joran van der Sloot’s feet grow and shrink almost 4 sizes from one day to the otherDIARIO Aruba
05/08/2006



ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Those of a little advanced or respectable age can still remember the time where there was an alcoholic beverage that was called ‘foot sweller’.

This alcoholic beverage, it was said, that those who drank too much of it, their feet swelled and because of this they called the drink ‘foot sweller’, but who can believe that in the year 2005 there are people in Aruba whose feet really swell or grow almost 4 sizes from one day to the other?

This was the case of the suspect Joran van der Sloot, who is currently peacefully studying in Holland and Aruba itself is stuck with the case of Natalee, and in the US they are trying in every way to organize and implement all sorts of boycotts and acts that could harm Aruba in the wide sense of the word.



This is not an attempt to cast guilt on Joran van der Sloot in the case of Natalee, but the fact is that the majority of people in the community is very angry in regards to the case of Natalee causing a negative impact on the economic situation, the image of the people of Aruba and surely, for the island’s tourism.


Too many changing declarations, formal deceit by the suspects and the very strange way in which the authorities, who have to be competent, have proceeded have today stuck Aruba in a very bad situation in regards to Natalee’s case and those who know the truth remain quiet believing that in this way, they can evade guilt of any involvement or any violation of the law.

From the copies of different police reports, today readers themselves can read how Joran van der Sloot, who until today for inexplicable reasons ‘supposedly’ left his expensive brand name running shoes at the beach on the night he was with Natalee, according to the version he gave police.

Police came up with the matter of the running shoes or it was Joran himself who started talking about the running shoes of an expensive brand name, size 14? From the police report of June 14, 2005, readers can read how Joran himself declared that he took off his size 14 running shoes and left them on the beach.

On June 29, 2005, he again repeated to police that he left his size 14 running shoes on the beach. The strange thing is that on August 2, 2005, after so many interrogations had already taken place, Joran van der Sloot in a car heading back to KIA, told a Dutch police officer who came to Aruba especially to interrogate the suspects, that Joran had on some K-Swiss running shoes that he borrowed from a fellow prisoner.

At no moment did the Dutch police officer ask Joran something, it was Joran himself who started talking with the police officer, as can been seen from the police report.

Now, the question is: was Joran brought from the first day to KIA shoeless and had no shoes to wear that it was a fellow prisoner who had to lend Joran a pair of running shoes?

Van der Sloot’s parents couldn’t bring shoes for Joran to wear, and someone from the prison had to lend him some shoes, and to top it all off they were K-Swiss brand?

By the way, at KIA they have to register, as in the majority of prisons around the world, what shoes and other belongings each person comes in with, yes or no? On August 8, 2005, the same Dutch police officer asked Joran to take off his shoe, which was a K-Swiss brand running shoe.

Joran asked to see his lawyer and wanted to find his lawyer’s support, but his lawyer didn’t even look at Joran and started to write (in local dialect, you deal with your problems!) After the Dutch police officer insisted, Joran took off the running shoe and handed it over across the table.

The police officer asked Joran how in the supposed day that he was with Natalee on the beach, he had size 14 K-Swiss running shoes, then how was the one that Joran put on the table size 10.5?

After Joran put his running shoe back on, the police pressed on the tip of the running shoes, and observed that the shoes were a good fit on Joran, and Joran didn’t react!

The matter of the size 14 K-Swiss running shoes is ‘too good to be true’. Was it the shark that Natalee supposedly wanted to see at the North shore that left with Joran van der Sloot’s size 14 running shoes?


// posted by Getagrip @ 5/10/2006 04:17:00 PM    


http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_05_07_archive.html


Until proven otherwise, I will have to go with Jossy on this.  


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: texasmom on May 06, 2007, 08:57:15 PM
Quote from: "Red"
New FP Post ...

Aruban Justice … 6 Years Is the Punishment in Aruba for the Mutilation and Burning of Pit Bulls Body


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/05/06/aruban-justice-6-years-is-the-punishment-in-aruba-for-the-mutilation-and-burning-of-pit-bulls-body/

Justice is supposed to be blind, not foolish.

One really begins to wonder when they see such justice handed out for such heinous crimes whether it makes any difference whether Aruban officials ever bother to prosecute or find anyone guilty of a crime.
 
...


Absolutely unbelievable!  From what I've read the "authorities" believe he overdosed himself, yeah right....  I think Klaasend has a point, what did this guy see, know, or maybe even threaten to tell that caused his horrible demise?  The punishment for all involved makes me wonder if they would have even been tried at all if there wasn't so much attention on this happy little island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: MsVada on May 06, 2007, 08:57:40 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i wear size 10

im 5'9"

joranjerk is not a size 10 or a 10.5



Hi Robots!

I agree, about joran jerk
My son is 5"11 and wears a size 12


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 08:57:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Red"
New FP Post ...

Aruban Justice … 6 Years Is the Punishment in Aruba for the Mutilation and Burning of Pit Bulls Body


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/05/06/aruban-justice-6-years-is-the-punishment-in-aruba-for-the-mutilation-and-burning-of-pit-bulls-body/

Justice is supposed to be blind, not foolish.

One really begins to wonder when they see such justice handed out for such heinous crimes whether it makes any difference whether Aruban officials ever bother to prosecute or find anyone guilty of a crime.
 
...


Typical of Aruba.  So Pitbull died of a drug overdose, his friends decide to cover it up by mutilating him and setting him on fire.  Makes alot of sense to me.  Or, could it be Pitbull was a message to others?


why the additional mutilation to his genitals? .. everything else was bad enough, someone had to grab that and... well, you know what I mean... apparently a woman chopped that off.. IIRC from the news article a while back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 08:58:48 PM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Quote from: "robots"
i wear size 10

im 5'9"

joranjerk is not a size 10 or a 10.5



Hi Robots!

I agree, about joran jerk
My son is 5"11 and wears a size 12


hello Ms. Vada  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 08:59:56 PM
Welcome to the forum Texasmom!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 09:03:23 PM
Is it true that Pitbull was tied up?? I read that somewhere.. I think that would prove he wasnt already dead..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: texasmom on May 06, 2007, 09:04:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome to the forum Texasmom!


 :D Thanks Klaasend!!  I'm am absolutely delighted to be back.  I've been lurking thought and you and the other mods have been doing a terrific job!  Thanks to RED also, for helping me get back in the cage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:04:56 PM
see, here is the thing

if ALE wanted to get down to business..they could have

go to check the other shoes joranjerk owned and put a fork in this once and for all. they didnt follow up on JACK S _ _  _ !!!!! :x



the DUTCH will  8)


this will be simple for the DUTCH


SIMPLE SIMPLE SIMPLE
 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 06, 2007, 09:06:38 PM
IIRC,gvc carried out a lot of nice linens,that looked like 300 thread count and soft.tough luck about the abuse,come here and see how prisoners are treated humanly,or GITMo.back to my nap,milk beckons


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:08:21 PM
Quote from: "texasmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome to the forum Texasmom!


 :D Thanks Klaasend!!  I'm am absolutely delighted to be back.  I've been lurking thought and you and the other mods have been doing a terrific job!  Thanks to RED also, for helping me get back in the cage.


Actually, I'm the only moderator here right now.  Sometimes though Lala's and San think they are in charge, but they really aren't  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 09:08:22 PM
O/T

I emailed Carnut earlier to see if he was okay after all the tornadoes, and I just heard back from him that he's fine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:09:13 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

I emailed Carnut earlier to see if he was okay after all the tornadoes, and I just heard back from him that he's fine.


Great news, thanks for letting us know.  Knowing Carnut he was probably out chasing the tornados :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:09:26 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Case of Natalee: report shows formal deceit
Joran van der Sloot’s feet grow and shrink almost 4 sizes from one day to the otherDIARIO Aruba
05/08/2006



ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Those of a little advanced or respectable age can still remember the time where there was an alcoholic beverage that was called ‘foot sweller’.

This alcoholic beverage, it was said, that those who drank too much of it, their feet swelled and because of this they called the drink ‘foot sweller’, but who can believe that in the year 2005 there are people in Aruba whose feet really swell or grow almost 4 sizes from one day to the other?

This was the case of the suspect Joran van der Sloot, who is currently peacefully studying in Holland and Aruba itself is stuck with the case of Natalee, and in the US they are trying in every way to organize and implement all sorts of boycotts and acts that could harm Aruba in the wide sense of the word.



This is not an attempt to cast guilt on Joran van der Sloot in the case of Natalee, but the fact is that the majority of people in the community is very angry in regards to the case of Natalee causing a negative impact on the economic situation, the image of the people of Aruba and surely, for the island’s tourism.


Too many changing declarations, formal deceit by the suspects and the very strange way in which the authorities, who have to be competent, have proceeded have today stuck Aruba in a very bad situation in regards to Natalee’s case and those who know the truth remain quiet believing that in this way, they can evade guilt of any involvement or any violation of the law.

From the copies of different police reports, today readers themselves can read how Joran van der Sloot, who until today for inexplicable reasons ‘supposedly’ left his expensive brand name running shoes at the beach on the night he was with Natalee, according to the version he gave police.

Police came up with the matter of the running shoes or it was Joran himself who started talking about the running shoes of an expensive brand name, size 14? From the police report of June 14, 2005, readers can read how Joran himself declared that he took off his size 14 running shoes and left them on the beach.

On June 29, 2005, he again repeated to police that he left his size 14 running shoes on the beach. The strange thing is that on August 2, 2005, after so many interrogations had already taken place, Joran van der Sloot in a car heading back to KIA, told a Dutch police officer who came to Aruba especially to interrogate the suspects, that Joran had on some K-Swiss running shoes that he borrowed from a fellow prisoner.

At no moment did the Dutch police officer ask Joran something, it was Joran himself who started talking with the police officer, as can been seen from the police report.

Now, the question is: was Joran brought from the first day to KIA shoeless and had no shoes to wear that it was a fellow prisoner who had to lend Joran a pair of running shoes?

Van der Sloot’s parents couldn’t bring shoes for Joran to wear, and someone from the prison had to lend him some shoes, and to top it all off they were K-Swiss brand?

By the way, at KIA they have to register, as in the majority of prisons around the world, what shoes and other belongings each person comes in with, yes or no? On August 8, 2005, the same Dutch police officer asked Joran to take off his shoe, which was a K-Swiss brand running shoe.

Joran asked to see his lawyer and wanted to find his lawyer’s support, but his lawyer didn’t even look at Joran and started to write (in local dialect, you deal with your problems!) After the Dutch police officer insisted, Joran took off the running shoe and handed it over across the table.

The police officer asked Joran how in the supposed day that he was with Natalee on the beach, he had size 14 K-Swiss running shoes, then how was the one that Joran put on the table size 10.5?

After Joran put his running shoe back on, the police pressed on the tip of the running shoes, and observed that the shoes were a good fit on Joran, and Joran didn’t react!

The matter of the size 14 K-Swiss running shoes is ‘too good to be true’. Was it the shark that Natalee supposedly wanted to see at the North shore that left with Joran van der Sloot’s size 14 running shoes?


// posted by Getagrip @ 5/10/2006 04:17:00 PM    


http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_05_07_archive.html


Until proven otherwise, I will have to go with Jossy on this.  


.


So Joran is likely to grow until he is 21 as most males tend to do.  He will then be 6'8" wearing a Size 20 shoe!  

LOAD ALERT!!

He is prolly about 6'3" now.  I have a son that height and since we seem to tend to believe what size shoe others wear more than what an examination of Joran's foot in a Size 10.5 showed, he wears an 11 narrow

Tall people with smallest feet do NOT topple over.  They do tend to turn their ankles often which is fairly common.

I don't understand how if his foot was measured in the 10.5 and it was a very comfortable fit, so much so that he was wearing a brand new pair just that size, why this is still a big mystery.

His foot was measured inside a 10.5 and it fit nicely according to Dutch interrogator.Feet, nose and ears continue to grow.  By the time Joran is 40, what size shoe will he be wearing?  

And if he is 6'5" why isn't he very much taller than anybody else except for his short stocky mother?  He isn't and neither does he wear a 14 shoe!

JMO

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:11:53 PM
he SCRUNCHED his TOES

when the COP checked his feet  8)



just like OJ and the GLOVES except OJ STRETCHED  his FINGERS as far as he could,,which normal people dont do


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:12:30 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
This is an email from Charles Croes. Ain't it interesting that he states he signed a non-disclosure agreement.


From: Fastphones Aruba
[Add to Address Book]
To: {{removed your email address}}
Subject: Re: Just wondering…
Date: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:36:55 PM [View Source]

I have signed a NDA agreement with two different police departments to not discuss this further.



Kerm, IIRC there was a forum post or e-mail by Charles Croes where he rattled off about eight law enforcement agencies he had given testimony to in regard to the case, FBI included.

Anybody else remember this? Would be good if we can find that post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:13:21 PM
Quote from: "robots"
see, here is the thing

if ALE wanted to get down to business..they could have

go to check the other shoes joranjerk owned and put a fork in this once and for all. they didnt follow up on JACK S _ _  _ !!!!! :x



the DUTCH will  8)


this will be simple for the DUTCH


SIMPLE SIMPLE SIMPLE
 :twisted:


Robots,
I posted it TWICE.  The DUTCH measured Jorans foot inside the 10.5 new pair of shoes he was wearing and it fit nicely.

Jossy wrote that whole article about it.  I posted a link to it just a couple of weeks ago, too.

His foot was measured inside the 10.5 and it was a very nice fit, certainly not four sizes too small.



I GUESS I AM INVISIBLE AGAIN!  Will try later when maybe I'm not.

. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:16:52 PM
Quote from: "robots"
he SCRUNCHED his TOES

when the COP checked his feet  8)



just like OJ and the GLOVES except OJ STRETCHED  his FINGERS as far as he could,,which normal people dont do



Right, and the Dutch interrogator was too stupid to notice a little thing like that??? Several of those were women and they certainly would notice that from measuring kids feet all the time.

And he bought a new pair four sizes too small for what reason?  Especially if he were trying to convince all he wore 14, he'd buy the new ones 14 unless he bought them before he thought of that game to play.

Go ahead and fall for it!  I really don't care any more but I know what I know and his foot is not a size 14 if it fits in a 10.5 comfortably.
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: texasmom on May 06, 2007, 09:16:52 PM
maybe the 10.5 shoes had been mis-sized...I can't imagine that he wore that size considering his height. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:17:40 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
see, here is the thing

if ALE wanted to get down to business..they could have

go to check the other shoes joranjerk owned and put a fork in this once and for all. they didnt follow up on JACK S _ _  _ !!!!! :x



the DUTCH will  8)


this will be simple for the DUTCH


SIMPLE SIMPLE SIMPLE
 :twisted:


Robots,
I posted it TWICE.  The DUTCH measured Jorans foot inside the 10.5 new pair of shoes he was wearing and it fit nicely.

Jossy wrote that whole article about it.  I posted a link to it just a couple of weeks ago, too.

His foot was measured inside the 10.5 and it was a very nice fit, certainly not four sizes too small.



I GUESS I AM INVISIBLE AGAIN!  Will try later when maybe I'm not.

. :roll:


i see you now...  8) let me go back and read

im watching UFO videos and ebaying and updating and posting here

im not good at multi tasking

love the outfit  8)  :D  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 09:18:02 PM
Here is some good footage of the tornado's the last few days..
http://www.liveleak.com/group/Midwest_Tornados


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:20:11 PM
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:21:48 PM
Anna, so you think that joran wears a size 10 or a 10.5 ??

im just not sure i understand

please dont bite my head off.... i have been working outside all day
and im tired

and you look great, but why you mad at me ???? :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:22:32 PM
Quote from: "robots"
[i see you now...  8) let me go back and read

im watching UFO videos and ebaying and updating and posting here

im not good at multi tasking

love the outfit  8)  :D  8)



Well, you must not love it too much to ignore my posts like that!   :roll:

We don't know how tall Joran is, only how tall he says he is.  Guess that and his shoe size are the only things that his word is just the gospel truth about?

I don't think so but we have this same discussion about every two or three weeks and always it is decided Joran is 6'%' because somebody said so and that he wears Size 14 shoe because Joran says so.

Why'd he want his lawyer to prevent the measuring if it were not true?

Will check back in late tonight but believe it or not shoe size is not always related to height especially in boys having growing spurts, etc.  And I have reared three of them through those phases.

JMO


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:23:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


thats what i thought also

i can scrunch my feet and wear a size 8 if i wanted to....

it looks ridiculous and feels worse but i can do it


i just tried it..... 8)  :shock:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: GreatOwl on May 06, 2007, 09:24:23 PM
Shoe size depends upon which country is supplying a particular store.  Buy from a hispanic source and sizes will be lower in number.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Picture6.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: GreatOwl on May 06, 2007, 09:25:28 PM
size 10.5 could equate to our 13.5


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 09:26:47 PM
Great Owl

There are also other strange discrepancies with shoe sizes. Did you know that a size 4 in women's shoes is completely different from a size 4 in girl's shoes?

A woman who wears a size 4 in women's shoes would have to buy a size 2.5 in girls shoes.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:27:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


Still, Klaas,
I don't think the odds of Joran getting a mis-labeled pair of shoes is very high.  Why didn't he say that instead and why did he want his lawyer to prevent that information from being revealed?

Guess Jossy is just all wrong on this, too.


Oh, well.  If somebody's uncle's brother's nephew wears a 14, I guess that means Joran does too despite the fact that not everybody even of the lofty height he claims to be and likely is not wear a shoe that large when they are still growing.


Carry on. . . .won't interrupt with this again.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:27:19 PM
JORAN 08/08/2005 Dutch Interrigators Statement
(translated by Ramm at BFN)

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=385


We,

Jaquelline Josette de WINDT, head officer with the Korps Politie Aruba, attached to the section surveillance of Sint Nicolaas.

Antoon Ronanld de RUITER, sergeant of police in the Netherlands, region Utrecht, districht Utrecht South East and appointed by National Decision by the Governor number DWJZ 3473/05 dated July 27th 2005 as special temporary officer of the Korps Politie Aruba.

Clemens Johannes Maria BURGWAL, sergeant of police in the Netherlands, region Utrecht, districht Paardenveld and appointed by National Decision by the Governor number DWJZ 3473/05 dated July 27th 2005 as special temporary officer of the Korps Politie Aruba.

State the following.

On Monday August 8th 2005, at approximately 09.48 we, the reporting officers, questioned in the police station of Oranjestad in Aruba, the suspect

Joran Andreas Petrus VAN DER SLOOT
born on August 6th 1987 in the Netherlands and living at Montanja 19 in Aruba

for further information.
The interview was conducted by us, reporting officers de Windt and the Ruiter and in the control-room, I, reporting officer Burgwal followed the interview via an internally installed video-system. And by me, reporting officer Burgwal a summation was made regarding the interview.

For the description of the interview room and the control room I refer to a seperate police report made about this.

In the interview room was also present the lawyer of the suspect, named mr. O.R.G. Faarup.

Suspect made statements to questions put to him, in an abridged version, the now following:

Suspect was congratulated by the reporting officers for his birthday. He smiled.

Suspect was then informed that the District Attorney on Aruba had filed a deposition with the court with regard to extending so that the temporary arrest warrant would be extended to September 4th.

Suspect was onces again informed of the statements that were made by his friend Freddy and people close to Freddy.

He was also asked why his legal team was mis-informing the press with regard to the interviews in an appearant attempt to put the police in a bad light. In the press it was written that the lawyers were not given time to speak to the client and that on his birthday he was interrogated from the early morning to late at night.
The suspect did not answer.

The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.

He was again confronted with statements made by several of his intimate friends that he had screwed them/hung them out to dry by lying and having sexaul relations with the girlfriend of one of his friends. These boys say that he has been constantly fooling them and manipulating.
He was again confronted with the statement of the girl Martina, who was offered a beverage during the sexual relations that caused her lips to feel tingly.

The suspect did not respond.

After that there were several confrontations with regard to the date of giving statements by several witnesses, the omissions in the statements of the suspect and the omissions in the statements made by his fellow suspects and the timeline in which those statements were made.
The suspect did not respond.

Suspect was asked to take off one of his shoes. Suspect looked back and wanted to find support from his lawyer but his lawyer was not looking at him and was writing. He put it on the the table noisily/with a bang.

The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.


The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: texasmom on May 06, 2007, 09:27:42 PM
I agree about boys having the "growth spurts".  I based my opinion about his shoe size on my sons, one of which is 6 foot 5 and wears a size 16 sometimes a 15 in the right shoe, and the other who is 6 foot 3 and wears a size 14 and is only 17 years old now.  They may have grown faster than some boys do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:28:20 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Is it true that Pitbull was tied up?? I read that somewhere.. I think that would prove he wasnt already dead..lol


So Aruba gets to keep another murder off the books thanks to a little legal and judicial origami.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: GreatOwl on May 06, 2007, 09:28:48 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Great Owl

There are also other strange discrepancies with shoe sizes. Did you know that a size 4 in women's shoes is completely different from a size 4 in girl's shoes?

A woman who wears a size 4 in women's shoes would have to buy a size 2.5 in girls shoes.  :?


yes, as a parent of 3 girls and having to find sizes in athletic shoes for them over their high school and college careers I had to shop many different stores and catalogs as I learned that sizing was different in many instances.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:28:51 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
[i see you now...  8) let me go back and read

im watching UFO videos and ebaying and updating and posting here

im not good at multi tasking

love the outfit  8)  :D  8)



Well, you must not love it too much to ignore my posts like that!   :roll:

We don't know how tall Joran is, only how tall he says he is.  Guess that and his shoe size are the only things that his word is just the gospel truth about?

I don't think so but we have this same discussion about every two or three weeks and always it is decided Joran is 6'%' because somebody said so and that he wears Size 14 shoe because Joran says so.

Why'd he want his lawyer to prevent the measuring if it were not true?

Will check back in late tonight but believe it or not shoe size is not always related to height especially in boys having growing spurts, etc.  And I have reared three of them through those phases.

JMO


.


Look, you  silly silly rascal

stop it  8)
i was not ignoring you.......now stop it or i will go on a RANT

and you dont want that...

we love it when you rant

so RANT away  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:29:58 PM
Anna - I'm not saying Josse is all wrong, I'm just saying for me it's still up in the air.  I don't think Josse has any more information than we do regarding the size of Joran's feet.

Logically speaking, Joran should wear a size 14 but it is possible he wears a size 10 1/2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 06, 2007, 09:31:08 PM
Re shoe size... you know the photo of the sporter making out on the catamaran?  Well, does anyone have the ability to look closer at that photo and see if you can read the size labelled on the bottom of the shoe?

Just a thought....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:32:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:32:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


who knows what his real size was... it is even theoretical that someone sewed a different tag in his shoe... so ...I don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:33:26 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Re shoe size... you know the photo of the sporter making out on the catamaran?  Well, does anyone have the ability to look closer at that photo and see if you can read the size labelled on the bottom of the shoe?

Just a thought....

I just tried, you can't see any size or anything on the bottom.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:34:26 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


I agree.  I was just wondering if the shoe size tag could have been altered or switched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 09:34:54 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


Unless it was a fake shoe..But I think just looking at the foot they would know by the huge size diffrence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 09:35:11 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Tamikosmom - this is just a flyby; on my way out. BUT - as someone pointed out a few pages ago, on the NEXT night - Monday night - J2K were busy with their casino outings and later, the Alabama posse. DK would not have been on his computer with J Croes on Monday night ... ?

Are you saying it was, or could have been, Tuesday night, that DK told J Croes about "hands down the pants"?


msmarple ... I apologize that it took so long to get back to you.  My hubby and I  have been at our grandson's birthday party ... just turned 4 years old.  Now that I am back in the sanctity of my home ... blessed peace and quiet ... I am attempting to catch up.

In my opinion ... Deepak's chat with John Charles Croes regarding obstructing the investigation and ... attempting to make sure Satish got the Holiday Inn fabrication straight ... took place "sometime" on Tuesday, May 31, 2005.  It could not have been too early ... according to Deepak's June 13, 2005 declaration it was around 6:45 AM on the morning of May 31, 2005 that he arrived home.  In his declaration of June 29, 2005 ... he states that Joran reminded him on May 31, 2005 that he could be monitored.

Janet


MAY 31, 2005


Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


At approximately 06:45 hours, I got home. I had locked my car and walked to the front door. Before I could open the door, Satish had opened the door. When I stepped inside Satish signaled me not to make noise because my mother was still sleeping. We walked to Satish's bedroom. When I got into his bedroom he asked me what precisely was going on. I had told him that the girl that we went out with, had gone missing. And that they are saying that we are the last people with whom the girl was last seen. Then I told him the story of the security guard. That story I hadn't told Satish on the phone. Satish asked me if we were in trouble and I said that I didn't think so because we weren't the ones who had been kissing her. After that Satish said to me that we would talk later, but that he needed to get ready to go to school.. Then I said to him that I would be going to bed too. I walked to my bedroom and turned on my airco and my computer and I went on "msn messenger". I had then turned off the screen of my computer and the loudspeakers. I sat down on my bed, took off my shoes and fell asleep. I was very tired. And that was in the night from Monday to Tuesday.


Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 29, 2005


On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*.

The purpose of the chat traffic was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday. But I have understood that they do not have the chat traffic from that night but that they do have the one from Tuesday. I know the technical procedure, so if they have the one from Tuesday than they should be looking for the one from Sunday to Monday. If I had anything to hide than I would have never told the police about John Charles CROES. Because that just worsened the situation. Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:35:35 PM
Klaas,
I didn't mean measure his foot with an instrument, only with their hand by pressing down on the toe section to see if there was room at the end.

Apparently, there was.

But carry on. . . .nothing to see here, doesn't likely matter anyway.

If the Dutch interrogators thought enough to do this and record it, apparently, they didn't think he wore any Size 14 either.

Would like to know if his actual height has ever been verified also.  Of course he is likely to have grown in two years so now he might actually be 6'5" but don't think he was in most of the photos.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 06, 2007, 09:36:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Re shoe size... you know the photo of the sporter making out on the catamaran?  Well, does anyone have the ability to look closer at that photo and see if you can read the size labelled on the bottom of the shoe?

Just a thought....

I just tried, you can't see any size or anything on the bottom.


Thanks.. bummer... but thanks for trying Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 09:36:56 PM
Hi monkeys!! I do not know about feet and height...but he does have a big head  :lol: (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/meerlyhere/greenfrank.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:37:15 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


Unless it was a fake shoe..But I think just looking at the foot they would know by the huge size diffrence.



What is a fake shoe?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:38:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


I agree.  I was just wondering if the shoe size tag could have been altered or switched.


In which case, he would have made them Size 14 to match his story.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:40:56 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


who knows what his real size was... it is even theoretical that someone sewed a different tag in his shoe... so ...I don't know.



Interesting statistic here. Michael Joran is 6' 6" tall, his shoe size is a 13. Three inches taller than Joran and one shoe size smaller?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:41:04 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


Unless it was a fake shoe..But I think just looking at the foot they would know by the huge size diffrence.



What is a fake shoe?

.




 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 09:42:58 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


who knows what his real size was... it is even theoretical that someone sewed a different tag in his shoe... so ...I don't know.



Interesting statistic here. Michael Joran is 6' 6" tall, his shoe size is a 13. Three inches taller than Joran and one shoe size smaller?

hmmmm.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 09:43:05 PM
Bah..These Rat Brothers!! Satish didn't even go to school the next day and I dont think deepak worked. They all probably slept all day like because they were up all night..I have my doubt's Joran was at school that next day as well..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:43:50 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


I agree.  I was just wondering if the shoe size tag could have been altered or switched.


In which case, he would have made them Size 14 to match his story.

.



It always comes back to the shoes doesn't it Anna? LOL. Read my post to Rob about Michael Jordan. Joran could very well have a smaller foot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 09:47:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - Jossy was wrong and retracted his statement later.  That was not the same time Natalee was there.  When it was shown on TV we all went nuts emailing NG and telling her Jossy was wrong, LOL  :lol:


Klaas ... Joran implied in his suspect statement of June 9, 2005 that he was was not sure which shoes he had worn.  Why would he lie?

Janet


Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


To your question as to what clothes I was wearing when I was picked up by Deepak and Satish, I can answer the following. I wore a white/blue shirt, a blue/white jeans trouser or a three-quart black trouser and a couple of white shoes or crème coloured boots


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:48:11 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


who knows what his real size was... it is even theoretical that someone sewed a different tag in his shoe... so ...I don't know.



Interesting statistic here. Michael Joran is 6' 6" tall, his shoe size is a 13. Three inches taller than Joran and one shoe size smaller?

hmmmm.



And I also don't think you can go by the shoes he was wearing after he was released from jail because he would have bought larger shoes to perpetuate his lie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:48:44 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


The reporting officers then asked him why he was wearing K-swiss shoes size 14 on the day in question when he now was wearing size 10.5 shoes.
After the suspect had put his shoe back on, I, reporting officer de Ruiter pressed down on the nose of the shoe and felt that the toes of the suspect fit straightly and properly in the shoe.
[/color]

The suspect did not respond.

The interview was concluded at approxmimately 11.30.



He only responds when he lies.

Klass, that statement make it pretty clear. You can't stuff a size 14 foot into a size 10 1/2 shoe.


I agree.  I was just wondering if the shoe size tag could have been altered or switched.


In which case, he would have made them Size 14 to match his story.

.



It always comes back to the shoes doesn't it Anna? LOL. Read my post to Rob about Michael Jordan. Joran could very well have a smaller foot.


Yep, wish I had a $ for every time my 6'3" size 11 NARROW has turned his ankles, too, likely because of small foot size but it does happen and he is well over 25 now.  Soaking feet, walking on crutches, seemed to go on forever with that one.  

Who was first talking about these shoes at RWV, Dayhiker?  Believe we got ignored there as well for a long time, LOL!!

Had forgotten we made the announcement they were looking and were ignored for something like two days!
Must just be one of those things people are going to think whatever they want to think about.  The more things change, the more they stay the same. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 09:50:21 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hi monkeys!! I do not know about feet and height...but he does have a big head  :lol: (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/meerlyhere/greenfrank.gif)


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranFrankenstien.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 09:50:49 PM
Anybody have a good pic of PVDS shoes? Just curious what size this guy may have..Anyone?? :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:51:54 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - according to the PV, the Dutch didn't measure his foot..the shoe was tagged a size 10 1/2.


who knows what his real size was... it is even theoretical that someone sewed a different tag in his shoe... so ...I don't know.



Interesting statistic here. Michael Joran is 6' 6" tall, his shoe size is a 13. Three inches taller than Joran and one shoe size smaller?

hmmmm.



And I also don't think you can go by the shoes he was wearing after he was released from jail because he would have bought larger shoes to perpetuate his lie.


And same for sewing new tags in the shoes, he would make them match the Size 14 lie if he were going to alter the size.  It would make no sense to alter them to prove he was lying.   :shock:

He got caught plain and simple and that is why he was angry and slamming the shoes down and trying to get his attorney to stop the sizing experiement.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 06, 2007, 09:52:39 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i wear size 10

im 5'9"

joranjerk is not a size 10 or a 10.5


OMG are we on the shoe issue again? Evening Monkeys.......I have just performed a rather un-scientific experiment.......probably like ALE might be capable of.. .. but first let me say.

If I am wearing a jogging sneaker, or shoe with alot of padding the shoe size will logically be bigger.

If I wear a different type of shoe ie a flat without alot of padding the size is usually smaller. Sometimes the manufacturer  has variations, shoe to shoe size varries.

My DH wears between 13 sneaker/shoe and has worn a 14 golf shoe on occasion.

I just took a tape measure and measured DH's  foot , which equals 11"-11.25".
 
IMO, despite the shoe size almost 1 year later being described as 10.5, could this have been just the foot measurement in inches-not all that accurate due to defective technique and likely ill co-operation from joran at the time. The shoe issue is even mentioned in his book, and continues to be an issue....I think it is a significant one.

I think the discrepancy is one of measured foot size in inches vs. the manufactures listed size of a padded sneaker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 09:52:52 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Anybody have a good pic of PVDS shoes? Just curious what size this guy may have..Anyone?? :D


Are you just trying to be a trouble maker?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:52:57 PM
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:54:00 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 29, 2005


On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*.

The purpose of the chat traffic was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday.  


He felt the need to create traffic on his computer before he ever knew she was missing? Don't think so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:54:41 PM
the damn heal of the shoes he is wearing is huge
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 09:55:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hi monkeys!! I do not know about feet and height...but he does have a big head  :lol: (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/meerlyhere/greenfrank.gif)


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranFrankenstien.gif)
ROFLMAO... PERFECT... :smt044


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 09:56:30 PM
In my family with all the nephews..etc..Everyone wears at least a 11 1/2 to size 14...Not one person is 6'5

Sloots have big feet or small feet? :D

I think 10 1/2 is small for a modern day dutch family. Remember dutch are the tallest people in the world.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:56:46 PM
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 09:57:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"


And I also don't think you can go by the shoes he was wearing after he was released from jail because he would have bought larger shoes to perpetuate his lie.


And same for sewing new tags in the shoes, he would make them match the Size 14 lie if he were going to alter the size.  It would make no sense to alter them to prove he was lying.   :shock:

He got caught plain and simple and that is why he was angry and slamming the shoes down and trying to get his attorney to stop the sizing experiement.
.[/quote]


I think he switched to size 14 after the crime in case they found a pair of 10 1/2 shoes that would incriminate him. They need to drag his ass in and measure his feet, and while they're at it ask him to clear up that and a whole bunch of other lies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:58:35 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.



he has long legs and when you look at the bottom of his pants you can see how wide the pants are at the bottom and the darn shoes are  still long


not as size 10.5

they cant be  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:58:36 PM
Quote from: "*******"
In my family with all the nephews..etc..Everyone wears at least a 11 1/2 to size 14...Not one person is 6'5

Sloots have big feet or small feet? :D

I think 10 1/2 is small for a modern day dutch family. Remember dutch are the tallest people in the world.



I believe that title would go to some of the African races.  The Dutch may be the tallest Caucasians but I don't think the tallest of all people on earth.  Only in their own minds.  I'm about 5'3" tops.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 09:59:37 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.


look at the shoes compared to paulus

does paulus wear a size 6 ????

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 09:59:56 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.



he has long legs and when you look at the bottom of his pants you can see how wide the pants are at the bottom and the darn shoes are  still long


not as size 10.5

they cant be  8)


Well Anita's are almost as long and as big.

And she is prolly about 5'2"

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:02:12 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.



he has long legs and when you look at the bottom of his pants you can see how wide the pants are at the bottom and the darn shoes are  still long


not as size 10.5

they cant be  8)


Well Anita's are almost as long and as big.

And she is prolly about 5'2"

.


2 different kinds of pants  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 10:03:30 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "*******"
In my family with all the nephews..etc..Everyone wears at least a 11 1/2 to size 14...Not one person is 6'5

Sloots have big feet or small feet? :D

I think 10 1/2 is small for a modern day dutch family. Remember dutch are the tallest people in the world.



I believe that title would go to some of the African races.  The Dutch may be the tallest Caucasians but I don't think the tallest of all people on earth.  Only in their own minds.  I'm about 5'3" tops.

.

I saw a few programs on TV recently..Dutch are the tallest in the world :wink:
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2004/07/dutch_worldas_t.php

The Dutch, already the tallest people on the planet, are still growing. Data collected over the last seven years showed increasing demand for larger clothing sizes in the Netherlands, where the average man is about 185 centimetres (6-foot-1) tall. The Dutch are nearly 10 centimetres taller on average than the British and Americans,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 10:03:49 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.


look at the shoes compared to paulus

does paulus wear a size 6 ????

 :lol:



Robots, it is possible he would be wearing oversized shoes after he was arrested to create the illusion his feet were bigger. Why would he not want his feet measured?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:04:45 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
in this thread on page 23, the picture of joran walking with anita

those shoes are not size 10

NO  WAY  8)


Dress shoes always look longer.  If they are not size 10 then Anita's must be.  She's very short so I kind of doubt it.

JMO.

.


look at the shoes compared to paulus

does paulus wear a size 6 ????

 :lol:



Robots, it is possible he would be wearing oversized shoes after he was arrested to create the illusion his feet were bigger. Why would he not want his feet measured?


yes, very possible

i can see that  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 10:05:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "texasmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome to the forum Texasmom!


 :D Thanks Klaasend!!  I'm am absolutely delighted to be back.  I've been lurking thought and you and the other mods have been doing a terrific job!  Thanks to RED also, for helping me get back in the cage.


Actually, I'm the only moderator here right now.  Sometimes though Lala's and San think they are in charge, but they really aren't  :lol:  :lol:

I only pretend to lock the cage when Klaas isn't around.  Then I panic when I still see people posting and right in bold letters STOP POSTING :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:06:18 PM
when joranjerk was on greta do we have a picture of that ???


 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 10:07:36 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "texasmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome to the forum Texasmom!


 :D Thanks Klaasend!!  I'm am absolutely delighted to be back.  I've been lurking thought and you and the other mods have been doing a terrific job!  Thanks to RED also, for helping me get back in the cage.


Actually, I'm the only moderator here right now.  Sometimes though Lala's and San think they are in charge, but they really aren't  :lol:  :lol:

I only pretend to lock the cage when Klaas isn't around.  Then I panic when I still see people posting and write in bold letters STOP POSTING :lol:  :lol:

Should be write :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:07:51 PM
*******,
Here's a story about the Dutch being the world's tallest people.  Not any of them I know.  My sons are tall but all the Dutch females I know are shorter than average.

http://health.netscape.com/story/2006/09/15/the-dutch-are-the-worlds-tallest-people


Guess I am by that the way most are the shoe size, find it hard to believe if the height averaged out.  The men might be but the women are short like Greta.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 10:08:03 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hi monkeys!! I do not know about feet and height...but he does have a big head  :lol: (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/meerlyhere/greenfrank.gif)
:smt046


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 10:08:45 PM
Paul looks like he has some good size feet from the bad pics I have seen..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:12:57 PM
joran got the big feet and the big head from anita  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:13:42 PM
Texasmom


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th453.jpg)

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 10:14:19 PM
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Joran_20Holl_202_small.jpg

Joran doesnt look to taller than paulus in this picture.. I betcha he is closer to 6'3 than 6'5


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:14:19 PM
joran got the big feet and the big head from anita  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:15:41 PM
Quote from: "*******"
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Joran_20Holl_202_small.jpg

Joran doesnt look to taller than paulus in this picture.. I betcha he is closer to 6'3 than 6'5



EXACTLY!  He should tower over everybody else and he just doesn't!

Feet not that much larger, either.

. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 10:16:27 PM
Hey gang, I'm back.
On the way back from Chicago last nite something that was posted on Friday that I didn't understand hit me like a ton of bricks.
"the duck walk"
Somewhere between Lafayette and Lebanon it hit me and I burst out laughing, everyone in the car looked at me like I was a little goofy.
Never heard that before now I understand.

Catching up, for what it's worth.  I like ASICS brand tennis shoes, I wear a size 11 - 1/2 without having to try them on.  If I buy Adidas I but 12s.
I got a pair of Nikes for my Bday last month in 12 and took them back for 13s.  

It doesn't appear any of the criminals did the Duck Walk today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 10:16:49 PM
Quote from: "robots"
joran got the big feet and the big head from anita  8)


He seems to be overbearing and controlling like Anita, and quite transparents as is his mother.  

Does anyone have the picture of Anita and Beth together, a picture of Greta and Beth together?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:17:38 PM
Quote from: "*******"
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Joran_20Holl_202_small.jpg

Joran doesnt look to taller than paulus in this picture.. I betcha he is closer to 6'3 than 6'5


In my opinion, he's a good 4 inches taller than his father.

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/45518519_ff1976bc1b.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:19:12 PM
he is at least a foot taller than   "ineeda" new blouse



 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 10:20:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Joran_20Holl_202_small.jpg

Joran doesnt look to taller than paulus in this picture.. I betcha he is closer to 6'3 than 6'5


In my opinion, he's a good 4 inches taller than his father.

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/45518519_ff1976bc1b.jpg)

At eye level it's maybe 2, the rest is Frankenstein forward!  LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 06, 2007, 10:21:48 PM
Quote from: "robots"
when joranjerk was on greta do we have a picture of that ???


 8)


Casino video still, thanks to Kemit, reported by joran to be the same shoes on Greta interview as those he wore "that night"
(http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/5746/image205lr7.jpg)

(http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/1531/gretainterviewwithjoranshoeswh7.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 10:22:12 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Hey gang, I'm back.
On the way back from Chicago last nite something that was posted on Friday that I didn't understand hit me like a ton of bricks.
"the duck walk"
Somewhere between Lafayette and Lebanon it hit me and I burst out laughing, everyone in the car looked at me like I was a little goofy.
Never heard that before now I understand.

Catching up, for what it's worth.  I like ASICS brand tennis shoes, I wear a size 11 - 1/2 without having to try them on.  If I buy Adidas I but 12s.
I got a pair of Nikes for my Bday last month in 12 and took them back for 13s.  

It doesn't appear any of the criminals did the Duck Walk today.
Joran does it a lot!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:22:38 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Joran_20Holl_202_small.jpg

Joran doesnt look to taller than paulus in this picture.. I betcha he is closer to 6'3 than 6'5


In my opinion, he's a good 4 inches taller than his father.

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/45518519_ff1976bc1b.jpg)

At eye level it's maybe 2, the rest is Frankenstein forward!  LOL!


I've never thought of Paulus as being 6'1" more like 5'10ish.  Which would put Joran closer to 6'2".



NOTE TO KLPD:

Measure the Sporter's height.

Measuure the Sporter's Shoe Size.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 06, 2007, 10:23:50 PM
Quote from: "robots"
he is at least a foot taller than   "ineeda" new blouse



 8)
:smt003  :smt003  :smt044


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:24:44 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "robots"
he is at least a foot taller than   "ineeda" new blouse



 8)
:smt003  :smt003  :smt044


im glad someone caught that  :wink:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:26:44 PM
Beth, Greta, Anita, Paulus:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BethAnita.jpg)

Beth and Greta:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BethGreta.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:27:45 PM
Koen must also be 6'5"!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/JoranKoen072606.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 06, 2007, 10:29:02 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Koen must also be 6'5"!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/JoranKoen072606.gif)


Thought joran always said he was 6'4"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 10:29:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Koen must also be 6'5"!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/JoranKoen072606.gif)


Im on my mac so I cant see my photos:(..He isnt nearly as tall as Joran in other pics I saw recently.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:29:35 PM
Anita & Greta = very short.  I doubt Greta much over 5' if that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:31:12 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Anna"
Koen must also be 6'5"!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/JoranKoen072606.gif)


Im on my mac so I cant see my photos:(..He isnt nearly as tall as Joran in other pics I saw recently.


They's always been about the same height in all the ones I have seen.  Same for all the Caucasians in the photos with Joran.  Only Kalpoes seem shorter.  And maybe Freddie.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 10:31:47 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Anybody have a good pic of PVDS shoes? Just curious what size this guy may have..Anyone?? :D


(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/1298/abcinterviewpaulusshoesyi5.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:33:43 PM
klass has mail of a picture
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 10:33:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Beth, Greta, Anita, Paulus:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BethAnita.jpg)

Beth and Greta:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BethGreta.jpg)


Hi everyone!  I see it's the shoes again...if I may could I ask for a slight subject change just for a second....thanks.   Klaas, please note in the top photo the top of Paulus' head...remember how hard it was to see that part in some of his other photos.   Now could you check on that casino video also and see how the hairline lines up to it?  Just asking, when you get a chance. Thanks.


Now, back to shoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 10:36:05 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Joranshoes.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:36:53 PM
Quote from: "robots"
klass has mail of a picture
 8)


Thanks Robots!  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/85586479_520c25a0ba_m.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:37:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
klass has mail of a picture
 8)


Thanks Robots!  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/85586479_520c25a0ba_m.jpg)


your welcome  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 06, 2007, 10:41:16 PM
Good night monkeys....going to dream of shoe sizes, forearms, heights of all involved and when we will ever have an answer.... :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:41:27 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 10:41:34 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/normal_Friday_Night_2818229.jpg)

Just too hard to tell from photos.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:41:59 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good night monkeys....going to dream of shoe sizes, forearms, heights of all involved and when we will ever have an answer.... :?


Night, Mere. Sweet dreams (but not of forearms, etc.)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 10:45:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 10:48:24 PM
Anna,

I'm sorry if I escalated this shoe debate, honestly one of my points was that all we have are photos so sans opportunity to measure his foot it's all speculative and as per perceptions. My perception is his feet don't appear out of scale to his body. I also missed that Jossy ever reported that, May of last year through the entire summer I just was too distracted I guess. I missed a lot then.

When all we have is photos this is just too hard, it's so seldom people photograph feet as it is  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 10:48:44 PM
Quote from: "San"
I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.


Hubby has never seen any of these before. I just showed them to him, and asked him if he thought the casino pic was the same person as in the other pics. He thought they were. I think it's pretty plain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 06, 2007, 10:49:07 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.


I have to agree San unless of course paulus has a hair twin in Aruba  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 10:50:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/normal_Friday_Night_2818229.jpg)

Just too hard to tell from photos.

.


Theres another pic from this same evening and joran has koen by a few inches..No doubt Joran has at least 3 inches on paulus also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 06, 2007, 10:52:23 PM
Just caught up again...and Anna, and anyone else who may agree....I believe Koen may be one who may wear a size 14 shoe, along with Joran...just basing it on body size.  Posted such several pages back...

I definitely believe the PVDS hairline matches that of the video from the Excelsior Casino...latest comparison photos have my convinced.....but I was long before.

May be back...not sure...multiple users of this computer, here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 10:53:30 PM
I knew it!  I knew it!  The minute I saw that photo posted I knew we had what we needed. Yes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 10:53:58 PM
San.. the shot with Greta and Beth.. with Paulus at the front gate would be a very good comparison. It happened only a few days later... like a week..

I agree it is him. Always have.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 10:55:17 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranKoen072606.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 10:56:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 06, 2007, 10:57:52 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.



Darn sure is. That hairline is a ringer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 10:58:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranKoen072606.gif)

I think Koen is only about an inch maybe a little more shorter than Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 10:58:31 PM
ALE knows it is paulus


that was #1 time he was with Natalee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 10:58:38 PM
The reason no one from the darkside has denied that was him is because....it has been him all along.  He was there with Joran that night.  The FBI knows this, they have known all along.  The ALE knows this and of course the monkeys pegged it from the beginning....

Gotcha!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 11:00:09 PM
(http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/1111/375193915212a3aab88he.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:00:14 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/normal_Friday_Night_2818229.jpg)

Just too hard to tell from photos.

.


I guess these are the girls that Joran is referencing in his book.  These girls must be so proud that he mentioned them in his book.

FROM JORAN'S BOOK:

- On Aruba girls give it up (sex) much more easily. The weather is nice, everybody is a lot nicer. If it gets hot here (weather) than the hormones also start acting up. There are girls here who are just here for the sex, nothing more and nothing less. They are not stupid. I don't have the illusion that they were all smitten/infatuated with me.

- On Aruba you must also expect that your girlfriend might be getting it on with someone else too. It is a small island. You all go to the same schools, know the same crowd, go to the same clubs to go out and pick up girls. You have to be really good in order to be a player. Joran personally knows a few guys who have 2 or 3 phones for that reason. Joran only had 1 and that was private. I did not like it when girls were looking in my phone who I had been phoning/text messaging with. "If you would trust me, you would not check up on my through my phone" is what Joran would say to them. But he did not deserve that trust because he was no angel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:01:04 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PaulusCasinoCompare.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 11:01:11 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 06, 2007, 11:01:37 PM
(http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e356/concernedmother/CasinoNataleepointscopy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 11:02:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PaulusCasinoCompare.jpg)


you re killin me over here tonight.... :D

We had the same thoughts on the mystery guy at the jail.. too... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:02:38 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.

Because we finally got the head angle of Paulus to compare.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 11:02:54 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline2.jpg)


Rob ... best comparison yet!!! Thank you.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 11:03:52 PM
Take a look at the pic to the right of the one in the casino - does it look to anyone else that the long strand of hair is showing in the casino pic too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 11:04:11 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Anna,

I'm sorry if I escalated this shoe debate, honestly one of my points was that all we have are photos so sans opportunity to measure his foot it's all speculative and as per perceptions. My perception is his feet don't appear out of scale to his body. I also missed that Jossy ever reported that, May of last year through the entire summer I just was too distracted I guess. I missed a lot then.

When all we have is photos this is just too hard, it's so seldom people photograph feet as it is  :lol:



Oh, no, none,
We have this shoe discussion about every three weeks and what Jossy and the Dutch investigator determined are always totally dismissed.  Joran is 6'5" and wears a Size 14 shoe no matter what the Dutch investigator found.   :wink:

I wonder why it keeps coming up as an issue if it is all settled like that, however.  And why the Dutch got that in the record as being the wrong shoe size and why Joran got upset about it.

Maybe some day we will know for sure.  Until then, I go with the Dutch investigator who, in MY OPINION ONLY, caught Joran in a bold faced lie about the shoe size.



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/broken-record.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:04:21 PM
San - plus his hair appears to be shorter in the casino and the photo with Beth and Greta.  In some of the other photos it almost looks like he's trying for a comb over  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 11:06:16 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/normal_Friday_Night_2818229.jpg)

Just too hard to tell from photos.

.

Future Fluffer girls.These are the girls that keep the 'hard' in Hardcore. Their parents must be so proud of their little girls associating with such a celebrity...............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 06, 2007, 11:06:59 PM
Night monkeys.

I'm sure we'll still be discussing this tomorrow.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 11:07:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.

Because we finally got the head angle of Paulus to compare.

The middle and top right pics seal the deal.  This has to be questioned.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:07:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
San - plus his hair appears to be shorter in the casino and the photo with Beth and Greta.  In some of the other photos it almost looks like he's trying for a comb over  :wink:

I guess it's OK for Paulus to get a haircut now because we know it him and he doesn't have to keep in long anymore to try and fool people.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 11:09:13 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/normal_Friday_Night_2818229.jpg)

Just too hard to tell from photos.

.


Let's just guess weights.  Koen 310 lbs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:09:33 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
San - plus his hair appears to be shorter in the casino and the photo with Beth and Greta.  In some of the other photos it almost looks like he's trying for a comb over  :wink:

I guess it's OK for Paulus to get a haircut now because we know it him and he doesn't have to keep in long anymore to try and fool people.


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 06, 2007, 11:09:48 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.


No doubt.  First contact with Natalee that night. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 11:09:59 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.

Because we finally got the head angle of Paulus to compare.

Right down to the white shirt!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 11:10:53 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 11:11:33 PM
IDENTICAL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 11:14:44 PM
That hairline just jumped out at me when I saw it.  I know everyone else was talking shoes, but my eyes just went right to it and I said to myself. OMG!  That's what we have been looking for.  It's him, it really is him sitting beside Natalee.  Even those we all knew it was him..we needed that final confirmation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:18:11 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
That hairline just jumped out at me when I saw it.  I know everyone else was talking shoes, but my eyes just went right to it and I said to myself. OMG!  That's what we have been looking for.  It's him, it really is him sitting beside Natalee.  Even those we all knew it was him..we needed that final confirmation.

So when all is said and done it is not a waste of time to talk about the shoes because something came from it.

Great find Lala's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:18:23 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
That hairline just jumped out at me when I saw it.  I know everyone else was talking shoes, but my eyes just went right to it and I said to myself. OMG!  That's what we have been looking for.  It's him, it really is him sitting beside Natalee.  Even those we all knew it was him..we needed that final confirmation.


Good eye Lala's  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 11:18:32 PM
Ok, got that first ride of the year buzz thing going.  Eyes watering, face tingling,  late nite sorta 'give it up' feeling.  
I'm checking out and checking back in the morning.  You all take care and let's hope for a 'duck walk' tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:18:54 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
That hairline just jumped out at me when I saw it.  I know everyone else was talking shoes, but my eyes just went right to it and I said to myself. OMG!  That's what we have been looking for.  It's him, it really is him sitting beside Natalee.  Even those we all knew it was him..we needed that final confirmation.

Exactly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 11:18:59 PM
Now, this is the reason we have to keep working on this...we have to go over all the things once more.  We may not always agree, but we all seem to have one thing in common....Justice for Natalee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:19:14 PM
Nite Indy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 06, 2007, 11:19:23 PM
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:20:37 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:


Does Joran actually say that?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 11:21:02 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:







 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

what a freaking liar  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 11:22:09 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:


Does he say this guy is also wearing Size 10.5 shoes?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:22:17 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:

So is Joran ratting out on one of his buddies.

Is it Marco/Guido that is playing cards or someone else.  We all assume that Guido was the dealer but maybe he was just playing cards.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 06, 2007, 11:23:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:


Does Joran actually say that?  :lol:

Yes, but also says Sweatyrunningman is long gone...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 11:23:40 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.

Because we finally got the head angle of Paulus to compare.

Right down to the white shirt!


The body is the same also.. Shoulders and build...

Posner must be a good buddy of PVDS IMO..That's why he was soo angry when they released this tape. Lots of other shots they have of them at the BJ table.. He must have hooked up PVDS with the PI also. Makes me wonder about the attorneys out of chicago for the kalpoes though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 06, 2007, 11:24:10 PM
No, San, remember, it's the one with the matty hair.  Not Guido.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:24:28 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:

So is Joran ratting out on one of his buddies.

Is it Marco/Guido that is playing cards or someone else.  We all assume that Guido was the dealer but maybe he was just playing cards.

I'm pretty sure Guido was not the dealer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 11:25:12 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:

If he actually says that, then that's a coffin nail!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 11:26:12 PM
Going back to another photo...sorry..I am curious here...did we ever decide who the guy was behind the Sloots at KIA release that Rob was asking about?  I think it's the same guy Anita is kicking in that other photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 11:26:14 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:

If he actually says that, then that's a coffin nail!


Yes but joran says its not his dad..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:26:18 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
No, San, remember, it's the one with the matty hair.  Not Guido.

.

Yes I remember we thought he had blonde highlights or his hair was spiked.  There is also a picture of Guido with blonde highlights.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:27:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Going back to another photo...sorry..I am curious here...did we ever decide who the guy was behind the Sloots at KIA release that Rob was asking about?  I think it's the same guy Anita is kicking in that other photo.

Yes it is the same guy Anita was kicking.  He is also behond the Sloots when they were at the court house arguing over the MSNBC tape.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 06, 2007, 11:28:24 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:


Does he say this guy is also wearing Size 10.5 shoes?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:




 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

smarty pants




 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 06, 2007, 11:28:37 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:

If he actually says that, then that's a coffin nail!


Yes but joran says its not his dad..lol

Yes and that's my point, if he feels the need to address it, that alone seals the deal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:28:44 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Going back to another photo...sorry..I am curious here...did we ever decide who the guy was behind the Sloots at KIA release that Rob was asking about?  I think it's the same guy Anita is kicking in that other photo.

He is the same guy but as far as I know we don't know who he is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 11:30:08 PM
There must be another layer to Paulus and Posner's over all culpability here. It looks to me as if the Excelsior is a logical target for a lawsuit whether Paulus is there or not, yet Posner is fearful that should Paulus be ID'd on that video something more will come out.

I mean the Excelsior is getting sued anyway.. so what is the reason to distance Paulus who admitted he was there earlier anyway... other than it blows his time line for the rest of the evening...???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 06, 2007, 11:30:22 PM
Wow!  Klaas, you really nailed Paulus this time!!  Also compare the black shadow under his chin in the casino photo with the hair on his chest in the photo at the gate.  There is no doubt this is PAULUS!  Good job!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: casa on May 06, 2007, 11:36:31 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/casinocomparenew.jpg)

I always knew it was Paulus in the casino but this one picture seals the deal.

This pic is quite compelling.

Because we finally got the head angle of Paulus to compare.

Right down to the white shirt!


The body is the same also.. Shoulders and build...

Posner must be a good buddy of PVDS IMO..That's why he was soo angry when they released this tape. Lots of other shots they have of them at the BJ table.. He must have hooked up PVDS with the PI also. Makes me wonder about the attorneys out of chicago for the kalpoes though.


Also, the man in the casino video had on a white shirt.  I do realize lots of men wear white shirts but I remember many times when there were pictures of Paulus he had on a white shirt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 06, 2007, 11:37:59 PM
Quote from: "tidycat"
Wow!  Klaas, you really nailed Paulus this time!!  Also compare the black shadow under his chin in the casino photo with the hair on his chest in the photo at the gate.  There is no doubt this is PAULUS!  Good job!


Lala's is the one who noticed the Greta photo with Paulus was a good match for the casino.  Great eye that Lala's has  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 06, 2007, 11:38:22 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "igsigs"
In the book Joran says there are 2 other people at the BlackJack table.

A 19 year old NLer and a *guy that resembles Paulus*... :arrow:

If he actually says that, then that's a coffin nail!


Yes but joran says its not his dad..lol

Yes and that's my point, if he feels the need to address it, that alone seals the deal.


Your right..We have never heard anyone ever deny that was PVDS until now..Those tapes have got to be copied in ALE posession. IF they are not then its a OBVIOUS coverup. You would think joran has seen all the police files though and would know.. Interesting that he specificly laid that rumor to rest. They all continue to lie anyways with what we know is on record.

2 meetings they say PVDS has with Natalee..TWO!!!! Chalk up another LIE for Joran..Its him!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 11:38:55 PM
Money laundering is a lucrative business...you can buy anything your heart desires...including silence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 11:40:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "tidycat"
Wow!  Klaas, you really nailed Paulus this time!!  Also compare the black shadow under his chin in the casino photo with the hair on his chest in the photo at the gate.  There is no doubt this is PAULUS!  Good job!


Lala's is the one who noticed the Greta photo with Paulus was a good match for the casino.  Great eye that Lala's has  :wink:


I am sure someone else would have noticed in due time...we were just occupied with shoes at the time.  Actually I was wondering why that photo was even posted since you can't see any feet.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 06, 2007, 11:40:31 PM
If it is revealed that the man recorded on the Excelsior Casino tape  conversing with Natalee at the Black Jack table is indeed Paulus ..... the implication is huge. The revelation would imply that Joran lied regarding when and why his father left the casino and ..... it would imply that Paulus lied regarding when and why he left the casino.  Both Joran and Paulus' declarations imply that Paulus' had left the casino for home prior to Joran encounter with Natalee and her friends at the Black Jack table.

Why was it so imporant that there was no Paulus/Natalee connection ... so important that a father would have his son lie in an official declaration?

Janet



Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father.

... When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends.


Paulus Van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time. Joran, with my permission, took over my seat because he had been eliminated earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:41:30 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Money laundering is a lucrative business...you can buy anything your heart desires...including silence.

I wish they would silence Joran for good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: San on May 06, 2007, 11:42:25 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "tidycat"
Wow!  Klaas, you really nailed Paulus this time!!  Also compare the black shadow under his chin in the casino photo with the hair on his chest in the photo at the gate.  There is no doubt this is PAULUS!  Good job!


Lala's is the one who noticed the Greta photo with Paulus was a good match for the casino.  Great eye that Lala's has  :wink:


I am sure someone else would have noticed in due time...we were just occupied with shoes at the time.  Actually I was wondering why that photo was even posted since you can't see any feet.  :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 06, 2007, 11:44:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "tidycat"
Wow!  Klaas, you really nailed Paulus this time!!  Also compare the black shadow under his chin in the casino photo with the hair on his chest in the photo at the gate.  There is no doubt this is PAULUS!  Good job!


Lala's is the one who noticed the Greta photo with Paulus was a good match for the casino.  Great eye that Lala's has  :wink:


I am sure someone else would have noticed in due time...we were just occupied with shoes at the time.  Actually I was wondering why that photo was even posted since you can't see any feet.  :roll:


The monkeys were trying to compare height of Paulus to Joran.  If anyone has a photo of Joran standing near a doorway that would prove if he is 6'5 but he seems to slouch a lot.  Not very athletic.


Oh, hello monkeys - a brief check-in today.  Been busy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 06, 2007, 11:45:47 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "tidycat"
Wow!  Klaas, you really nailed Paulus this time!!  Also compare the black shadow under his chin in the casino photo with the hair on his chest in the photo at the gate.  There is no doubt this is PAULUS!  Good job!


Lala's is the one who noticed the Greta photo with Paulus was a good match for the casino.  Great eye that Lala's has  :wink:


I am sure someone else would have noticed in due time...we were just occupied with shoes at the time.  Actually I was wondering why that photo was even posted since you can't see any feet.  :roll:


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 06, 2007, 11:46:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Money laundering is a lucrative business...you can buy anything your heart desires...including silence.

I wish they would silence Joran for good.


But only after they have extracted the truth from him by whatever means...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: wreck on May 06, 2007, 11:49:50 PM
All of these RIDICULOUS statements have been out there from the beginning. How in the HELL has ALE gotten away with these these gross  inconsistencies???? I truly WANT to believe that the Dutch are now going to end this -- but do they have the fortitude to bring down the entire Aruban Government?? The corruption is MONUMENTAL!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 06, 2007, 11:49:58 PM
Klaas:  
Quote
Lala's is the one who noticed the Greta photo with Paulus was a good match for the casino. Great eye that Lala's has Wink



Way to go Lala's!!!    :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: the big hammer on May 06, 2007, 11:52:33 PM
Paulus Plays Blackjack w/ Nat

Tamikosmom writes: If it is revealed that the man recorded on the Excelsior Casino tape conversing with Natalee at the Black Jack table is indeed Paulus ..... the implication is huge. The revelation would imply that Joran lied regarding when and why his father left the casino and ..... it would imply that Paulus lied regarding when and why he left the casino.

That's for sure.

And that picture sequence posted on previous pages nails it.  

Corroborating jvds need to say "it wasn't pvds" in lie filled book.

That picture has opened a door for me.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 06, 2007, 11:56:48 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
All of these RIDICULOUS statements have been out there from the beginning. How in the HELL has ALE gotten away with these these gross  inconsistencies???? I truly WANT to believe that the Dutch are now going to end this -- but do they have the fortitude to bring down the entire Aruban Government?? The corruption is MONUMENTAL!!!

I have never seen anything like it wreck. It explains why we are all still here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 06, 2007, 11:56:50 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
All of these RIDICULOUS statements have been out there from the beginning. How in the HELL has ALE gotten away with these these gross  inconsistencies???? I truly WANT to believe that the Dutch are now going to end this -- but do they have the fortitude to bring down the entire Aruban Government?? The corruption is MONUMENTAL!!!



Is it any wonder the government is trying to silence Diaro and Jossy?  The lone voice crying out for truth and justice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 06, 2007, 11:58:08 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
All of these RIDICULOUS statements have been out there from the beginning. How in the HELL has ALE gotten away with these these gross  inconsistencies???? I truly WANT to believe that the Dutch are now going to end this -- but do they have the fortitude to bring down the entire Aruban Government?? The corruption is MONUMENTAL!!!


Wreck- that's what it will take to get to the bottom of this. I don't know if there is a government on Earth willing to attempt that...

Anyone have any thoughts on that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: wreck on May 06, 2007, 11:59:26 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Paulus Plays Blackjack w/ Nat

Tamikosmom writes: If it is revealed that the man recorded on the Excelsior Casino tape conversing with Natalee at the Black Jack table is indeed Paulus ..... the implication is huge. The revelation would imply that Joran lied regarding when and why his father left the casino and ..... it would imply that Paulus lied regarding when and why he left the casino.

That's for sure.

And that picture sequence posted on previous pages nails it.  

Corroborating jvds need to say "it wasn't pvds" in lie filled book.

That picture has opened a door for me.

.


 If it was Paulus -- why did Joran say he had to go to the Airport to pick him up??? If Joran ACTUALLY did pick him up -- how did he get there? ? Joran had no car and did not have his license!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:01:49 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "wreck"
All of these RIDICULOUS statements have been out there from the beginning. How in the HELL has ALE gotten away with these these gross  inconsistencies???? I truly WANT to believe that the Dutch are now going to end this -- but do they have the fortitude to bring down the entire Aruban Government?? The corruption is MONUMENTAL!!!

I have never seen anything like it wreck. It explains why we are all still here.


I agree...Monumental is right..Every single detail in this case has been corrupted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: casa on May 07, 2007, 12:01:56 AM
Guess this is another one of those days/nights I'm talking to myself. Going to do something constructive!  Have a good evening!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:04:24 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Guess this is another one of those days/nights I'm talking to myself. Going to do something constructive!  Have a good evening!


I thought you were talking to me?  I am here trying to catch up with all I missed about the shoes?  How are you little kitty?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:04:53 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Guess this is another one of those days/nights I'm talking to myself. Going to do something constructive!  Have a good evening!


Ahh no worries..Night 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 07, 2007, 12:06:29 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Guess this is another one of those days/nights I'm talking to myself. Going to do something constructive!  Have a good evening!


Come over here with me behind the curtain and you can be the invisible monkey too :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 12:07:26 AM
joran drove his parents car

is there any reason to NOT think he did

DRINKING
GAMBLING
SNEAKING OUT
STEALING
TELLING LIE after LIE


he drove it...

he got a ride home and too the sloot car out

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:07:36 AM
I wish I could have seen None's pics!!!! They must not have been posted for long.... I have only seen her son with pads and helmet on, I have no other clue what he looks like.

The HEIGHT thing... The picture at the gate gives me some info. Beth is more than average height for a lady. I have talked to Beth face to face and she is very nearly as tall as I am. I am 5'9", she is about 5'7". Go from there in relative heights from that picture, Greta is in the BTgirl- klassend range, and PVDS is about 6'0" or 6'1". Joran is packin' about 6'3", he routinely shows about 3 inches taller than his father.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 07, 2007, 12:08:39 AM
I don't know if this has been discussed here or not, but looks like Aruba has a new terminal for private jets:
http://tinyurl.com/2nnoum


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 12:09:14 AM
but but but but but

cant say he drove it that night


naw..............blame the K2 brothers

better that way  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:10:29 AM
Sadly, I do not think the Dutch will bring down this house of cards.  I think they will handle it in their own way and we will never know how.  The implications of bringing down an entire government would be untold to the Aruban people and the Dutch themselves.   I too fear, this is much ado about nothing.  Corruption breeds corruption.  They are using this island as a pivot point for drug smuggling and money laundering.  All entities involved have dirty hands and that is why the United States has been so quiet for so long.  As I have said before...there are bigger fish to fry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: wreck on May 07, 2007, 12:11:17 AM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
I don't know if this has been discussed here or not, but looks like Aruba has a new terminal for private jets:
http://tinyurl.com/2nnoum

As IF they did not have a smuggling problem BEFORE they opend this?!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:12:15 AM
Quote from: "sb"
I wish I could have seen None's pics!!!! They must not have been posted for long.... I have only seen her son with pads and helmet on, I have no other clue what he looks like.

The HEIGHT thing... The picture at the gate gives me some info. Beth is more than average height for a lady. I have talked to Beth face to face and she is very nearly as tall as I am. I am 5'9", she is about 5'7". Go from there in relative heights from that picture, Greta is in the BTgirl- klassend range, and PVDS is about 6'0" or 6'1". Joran is packin' about 6'3", he routinely shows about 3 inches taller than his father.


Nonesy's son is very, very tall.  Trust me on this one.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:13:45 AM
Hi Tibro, are you invisible?  I hadn't noticed.  :lol:  

How are you today? It is today in your part of the world, right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:15:23 AM
The Dutch have one agenda ONLY on Aruba: keep it out of Chavez's hands.

I do not believe they will be successful.

I think they are only involved w/ Natalee now because they NEED us on their side. They basically were thumbing their noses at us until about 2 months ago when they felt their grip on happy-isle slipping.

And if you don't think that PVDS doesn't have CLOUT in the vaterland, think again. He is connected through Anita. BIG-TIME.

This is why I counsel patience. Don't all get your hopes up too high.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:16:03 AM
Quote from: "sb"
I wish I could have seen None's pics!!!! They must not have been posted for long.... I have only seen her son with pads and helmet on, I have no other clue what he looks like.

The HEIGHT thing... The picture at the gate gives me some info. Beth is more than average height for a lady. I have talked to Beth face to face and she is very nearly as tall as I am. I am 5'9", she is about 5'7". Go from there in relative heights from that picture, Greta is in the BTgirl- klassend range, and PVDS is about 6'0" or 6'1". Joran is packin' about 6'3", he routinely shows about 3 inches taller than his father.


We know that Jaime,Freddy,Lorenzo,Deepak and Anita are the only ones we can exclude from wearing size 14 shoes :wink:

I know Deepak said Satish was a giant compared to him..So we cant exclude him from having big feet..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:17:10 AM
Quote from: "robots"
but but but but but

cant say he drove it that night


naw..............blame the K2 brothers

better that way  8)


If they can't blame it on Natalee that's there second option :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 07, 2007, 12:17:39 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Tibro, are you invisible?  I hadn't noticed.  :lol:  

How are you today? It is today in your part of the world, right?


Hi Lala's - yes it is mid arvo Monday here.  Hope you are well and keeping up with the shenanigans in the cage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 12:17:43 AM
if the DUTCH dont get em, i will eat my ROBOTIC arm

 8)

100 percent - in my humble opinion
they will get em

too much there 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:18:01 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "sb"
I wish I could have seen None's pics!!!! They must not have been posted for long.... I have only seen her son with pads and helmet on, I have no other clue what he looks like.

The HEIGHT thing... The picture at the gate gives me some info. Beth is more than average height for a lady. I have talked to Beth face to face and she is very nearly as tall as I am. I am 5'9", she is about 5'7". Go from there in relative heights from that picture, Greta is in the BTgirl- klassend range, and PVDS is about 6'0" or 6'1". Joran is packin' about 6'3", he routinely shows about 3 inches taller than his father.


Nonesy's son is very, very tall.  Trust me on this one.  :wink:


Has Lala's Mom's daughter met the Son of None yet?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: wreck on May 07, 2007, 12:18:55 AM
Quote from: "sb"
The Dutch have one agenda ONLY on Aruba: keep it out of Chavez's hands.

I do not believe they will be successful.

I think they are only involved w/ Natalee now because they NEED us on their side. They basically were thumbing their noses at us until about 2 months ago when they felt their grip on happy-isle slipping.

And if you don't think that PVDS doesn't have CLOUT in the vaterland, think again. He is connected through Anita. BIG-TIME.

This is why I counsel patience. Don't all get your hopes up too high.


What is Anita's family's clout? I haven't heard of this in all of this time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:21:08 AM
Yes, Lala has met None Jr.  She thought he was handsome...he is quite the cutie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:22:16 AM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "sb"
The Dutch have one agenda ONLY on Aruba: keep it out of Chavez's hands.

I do not believe they will be successful.

I think they are only involved w/ Natalee now because they NEED us on their side. They basically were thumbing their noses at us until about 2 months ago when they felt their grip on happy-isle slipping.

And if you don't think that PVDS doesn't have CLOUT in the vaterland, think again. He is connected through Anita. BIG-TIME.

This is why I counsel patience. Don't all get your hopes up too high.


What is Anita's family's clout? I haven't heard of this in all of this time.


I refer you to Tylergal to enlarge as she sees fit. Some of it I cannot and will not post. Anita has Hague connections, I'll just leave it there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: the big hammer on May 07, 2007, 12:23:30 AM
JQK on Excelsior pvds Video

Kelly sure didn't poo-poo this.

IIRC, Kelly says something to effect: sure looks like pvds

Anyone got the transcript handy?

It's definitely paulus in that casino video.

...Premeditated murder...your own father...nice legacy, Paulus - you've made your boys proud.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:23:49 AM
So Lala is your DAUGHTER?

LOL I thought that was your DOG!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 12:24:17 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Paulus Plays Blackjack w/ Nat

Tamikosmom writes: If it is revealed that the man recorded on the Excelsior Casino tape conversing with Natalee at the Black Jack table is indeed Paulus ..... the implication is huge. The revelation would imply that Joran lied regarding when and why his father left the casino and ..... it would imply that Paulus lied regarding when and why he left the casino.

That's for sure.

And that picture sequence posted on previous pages nails it.  

Corroborating jvds need to say "it wasn't pvds" in lie filled book.

That picture has opened a door for me.

.


Hi everyone!

Just popping in for a brief moment then back to lurking mode again. I've posted this in the past and it was ignored but will post it again. Take it as you will.

Back when FOX and MSNBC were showing the casino video clips with Joran and Natalee at the casino table...it briefly showed Paulus standing up facing the dealer and saying something to him with a smile on his face. Then it cut the video back to the girls sitting there next to Joran. You could see it was Paulus clearly. I was jumping up and down when I saw it. I saw this video about 3 or 4 different times.  At that time I was on a private blog and every time it showed it I would post it quickly in hopes others would see it. No one saw it but me, unfortunately.  But believe me, it IS Paulus VanderSloot. That 100% I am sure of.

I wrote into Greta and Nancy Grace asking them about it and they never replied to me. After I saw it those few times, it never aired again. It suddenly disappeared. Just like the video where the searchers found a piece of Natalees top on the side of the rocks. It disappeared.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:26:44 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
JQK on Excelsior pvds Video

Kelly sure didn't poo-poo this.

IIRC, Kelly says something to effect: sure looks like pvds

Anyone got the transcript handy?

It's definitely paulus in that casino video.

...Premeditated murder...your own father...nice legacy, Paulus - you've made your boys proud.

.


What makes it "premeditated" is the fact that Paulus was talking to her in the casino and then she turns up missing a few hours later.  Makes even more sense now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 07, 2007, 12:28:55 AM
Thanks dkpen just like everything else - it disappears.  They should advertise Aruba as the Aruban Triangle.  It sure rivals the Bermuda Triangle


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:29:10 AM
Quote from: "sb"
So Lala is your DAUGHTER?

LOL I thought that was your DOG!  :lol:



OMG!  How funny is that?  I she were my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.
 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 12:30:01 AM
Some thoughts IMO

Posner could be angry that the picture was leaked because:
Things leaked couldn't be used in court
It would be bad for business of his casino
It would be bad for Aruba
It was part of the cover up not to let the picts out
The picts were an important part of the case and should be looked at that way and kept secret until the right time
There are more pictures that make PvdS and JvdS badly
He didn't want his name associated with this at all
He almost made Guido wet his pants for some reason and the guy left town, fast
PvdS was involved more with Posner in money laundry and/or favors of some sort to the powers that be in the casinos
PvdS knew where the skeletons were buried
You rub my back and I will rub yours

Someone higher up in govt was pulling the strings of all and the release of the picture put another kink in the cover up that needed to be covered up

These are just listed... not in order of any importance


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:31:12 AM
dkpen
I wonder if there is any way to find that part of the video.  You know everyone has suspected it for so long...just needed to prove it and lo and behold old sweaty told on himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: wreck on May 07, 2007, 12:31:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "sb"
So Lala is your DAUGHTER?

LOL I thought that was your DOG!  :lol:



OMG!  How funny is that?  I she were my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.
 :lol:

I am really confused now!!!!  :shock:  :oops:  :shock:  :?:  :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 12:33:40 AM
Shower time, be back in a bit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:34:28 AM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "sb"
So Lala is your DAUGHTER?

LOL I thought that was your DOG!  :lol:



OMG!  How funny is that?  I she were my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.
 :lol:

I am really confused now!!!!  :shock:  :oops:  :shock:  :?:  :!:


Sorry...I am Lala's Mom...my daughter is Lala. (not her real name)   If I was using a nickname that was concerning my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.  Cassie is my dog.  I think I just confused myself.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:34:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
JQK on Excelsior pvds Video

Kelly sure didn't poo-poo this.

IIRC, Kelly says something to effect: sure looks like pvds

Anyone got the transcript handy?

It's definitely paulus in that casino video.

...Premeditated murder...your own father...nice legacy, Paulus - you've made your boys proud.

.


What makes it "premeditated" is the fact that Paulus was talking to her in the casino and then she turns up missing a few hours later.  Makes even more sense now.


PVDS is involved one way or the other in NH'S dissapearance. The KLPD know that and treated Paulus accordingly...Like a suspect.Paulus had no one to cry to this time except radio stations.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 12:35:58 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Some thoughts IMO

Posner could be angry that the picture was leaked because:
Things leaked couldn't be used in court
It would be bad for business of his casino
It would be bad for Aruba
It was part of the cover up not to let the picts out
The picts were an important part of the case and should be looked at that way and kept secret until the right time
There are more pictures that make PvdS and JvdS badly
He didn't want his name associated with this at all
He almost made Guido wet his pants for some reason and the guy left town, fast
PvdS was involved more with Posner in money laundry and/or favors of some sort to the powers that be in the casinos
PvdS knew where the skeletons were buried
You rub my back and I will rub yours

Someone higher up in govt was pulling the strings of all and the release of the picture put another kink in the cover up that needed to be covered up

These are just listed... not in order of any importance



IBE...Posner WAS pissed off that that video was leaked. I think that is why it suddenly disappeared.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: wreck on May 07, 2007, 12:36:04 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "sb"
So Lala is your DAUGHTER?

LOL I thought that was your DOG!  :lol:



OMG!  How funny is that?  I she were my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.
 :lol:

I am really confused now!!!!  :shock:  :oops:  :shock:  :?:  :!:


Sorry...I am Lala's Mom...my daughter is Lala. (not her real name)   If I was using a nickname that was concerning my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.  Cassie is my dog.  I think I just confused myself.  :roll:


 :P  8)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 07, 2007, 12:36:25 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "sb"
So Lala is your DAUGHTER?

LOL I thought that was your DOG!  :lol:



OMG!  How funny is that?  I she were my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.
 :lol:

I am really confused now!!!!  :shock:  :oops:  :shock:  :?:  :!:


Sorry...I am Lala's Mom...my daughter is Lala. (not her real name)   If I was using a nickname that was concerning my dog I would be Cassie's Mom.  Cassie is my dog.  I think I just confused myself.  :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:  Is Cassie your dog's REAL name?  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:38:23 AM
I understand now when you say it's not her real name. I would have thought "Cassie" to be more of a "daughter" name... That's OK, there were people up to a year ago who thought I was a "her"!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 12:39:26 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
dkpen
I wonder if there is any way to find that part of the video.  You know everyone has suspected it for so long...just needed to prove it and lo and behold old sweaty told on himself.


Lala....I wrote into Greta and Nancy Grace about that part of the video in hopes they could send me a copy, or pay for the copy, and never got a response from either of them. I'm sure they were told to keep it under wraps. But I sware to you that I saw this video clip of Paulus standing up, facing the dealer and speaking to him. He was on the right side of that pole while standing.


Title: Other Pictures
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 12:42:10 AM
Dkpen I remember that and was asking a few weeks or a month or so ago about the other picts where the camera angle was more to the right and one more to the left of what we see now.

I heard nothing from the board about this. I sure thought I'd had seen more, so guess it was on TV.

There is another picture I have and many of you do too and that is of Beth suffering when she must have been told of Natalee's death. It was on TV once and then never. It was posted once on a site and then never have I seen it again.

It's so sad. This whole thing has gone on far too long without Justice for Natalee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:43:25 AM
All kidding aside...

SMOKING GUN

We have PVDS definitively confirmed as the man who sat by Natalee in the casino.

That means that EVERY lie told about him being in Holland, watching the kids, etc. was an act of DECEIT in order to COVERUP illicit activities.

"Your own father... unbelievable".

Dare we say that Deepak thinks PVDS assaulted Natalee that night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 12:45:27 AM
So do the pictures just evaporate or are they being used in the investigation?

Hopefully, we will know soon. Depends, maybe, if the Dutch are willing to do something about it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 12:46:17 AM
Most pass over what I post and ignore what I have to say or add to the conversation. But if someone has connections (ie Red or Easy) they might be able to get Nancy Grace or Greta to talk about it or give an answer about that part of the video that was revealed. Or flat out lie about it ever been shown. Like I said, it disappeared shortly after it was shown a few times like the video with the cloth from Natalees shirt. They attempted to cover that up claiming it was fish netting. riiiiight!!!  They are so full of it.

Well anyways...back to lurking.

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 07, 2007, 12:47:16 AM
Interesting that FOB (Sloot Central) does not dare to talk about, let alone translate, Joran's book.

I guess all the contradictions in his *diaries* clued them in.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:50:03 AM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
dkpen
I wonder if there is any way to find that part of the video.  You know everyone has suspected it for so long...just needed to prove it and lo and behold old sweaty told on himself.


Lala....I wrote into Greta and Nancy Grace about that part of the video in hopes they could send me a copy, or pay for the copy, and never got a response from either of them. I'm sure they were told to keep it under wraps. But I sware to you that I saw this video clip of Paulus standing up, facing the dealer and speaking to him. He was on the right side of that pole while standing.


If thats the case this would help alot if they released that tape or re-air what you saw. Joran's profiting from a book I beleave its only fair that they expose his lies. I wouldn't count on greta but ng shouldn't have any problems showing that clip again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 12:51:30 AM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Most pass over what I post and ignore what I have to say or add to the conversation. But if someone has connections (ie Red or Easy) they might be able to get Nancy Grace or Greta to talk about it or give an answer about that part of the video that was revealed. Or flat out lie about it ever been shown. Like I said, it disappeared shortly after it was shown a few times like the video with the cloth from Natalees shirt. They attempted to cover that up claiming it was fish netting. riiiiight!!!  They are so full of it.

Well anyways...back to lurking.

God bless~

I seriously doubt Red or Easy or Jossy will be able to obtain that full video.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:51:31 AM
Time for me to hug Nemo. See you guys later.   Keep up the good work.  Wonder what tomorrow's topic might be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:52:04 AM
dkpen, I have always thought you have been a valuable contributor to this Site. Hang in there!

We all know that Mainstream Media has deep-sixed a lot of pertinent info. The honchos in MSM have timeshares that are losing value. That's why they have combined to try to exonerate the perps and deny that a crime took place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 12:52:20 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
So do the pictures just evaporate or are they being used in the investigation?

Hopefully, we will know soon. Depends, maybe, if the Dutch are willing to do something about it.


IBE - what pictures are you referring to?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:52:42 AM
Joran van der Sloot: One day I will explain exactly what happened. But right now I don‘t feel ready to do that.  
................
Paul van der Sloot said in a phone conversation with Peter de Vries that they had a lot to tell but they will not do that just now because of people involved who could be hurt by this information :wink:


Title: Brain
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 12:53:34 AM
dkpen... We are here; it's just I have a 56k modem and brain tonight to match!

I saw those too and then all we see now is just one casino view.

I hope that the pictures are helping in the case...more that we know now. Like the info coming out about wire taps of Paulus or however it was done about the 4 AM info and that led to what Paulus didn't get in the way of money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 12:54:44 AM
In the video it looked much mor like Natalee Top than in the still photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sb on May 07, 2007, 12:56:58 AM
OK, signing off for the night. See y'all tomorrow evening!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 12:58:37 AM
Nite SB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 12:59:25 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Interesting that FOB (Sloot Central) does not dare to talk about, let alone translate, Joran's book.

I guess all the contradictions in his *diaries* clued them in.

Honestly, I'm shocked at how ill informed most of them are.


Title: Pictures
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:00:35 AM
Well, we all were looking at the casino pict of Paulus awhile back and I thought I had seen other pictures of him there with different camera angles.. you know, cameras in the casino ceiling and others over the shoulder of the the one we have now.  

I thought I had seen them here whenever they came out, but now, maybe like dkpen I saw them on TV

I just know I saw other views of him... for I am "into" camera angles out of past experiences. I have been told by dear friends, I am not a good one to watch TV with or go to a movie for I see mistakes and different things because of being in the Industry for a while.

I am glad dkpen mentioned this for I thought I was "dreaming" or reading too long about the case. You know, the feeling you know and yet you can't put your finger on from just "when and where"

Some things I can't blame on "Senior Moments" for they are etched into the brain about Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rooscrew on May 07, 2007, 01:03:46 AM
DK and other monkeys who feel they might go unnoticed or ignored.

I read everything that is posted, please don't think you aren't important. Sometimes, the pages go by so fast and some of us are trying to catch up to be in realtime posting and by the time we get caught up everybody has gone. Also, alot of times by the time I get caught up everything has been hashed out and the questions I had come to mind have been asked and answered by then.  I do read your posts as I think you have lots of good material that comes into discussions. :) So, please know that you are just as important as anybody else is here and your input is just as valuable. :)
 
Roos~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:06:40 AM
Oh sorry Klaas there were other pictures of him with other camera angles. One was really good showing his watch. The one showing now wasn't the one, I don't think, used to zero into a close up on his watch (we have him hairwise) but some Monkey, I think, really got into the close ups on his watch.

 don't think this current picture could do that. Maybe it was SB, Slueth, Carpe or ??? maybe it was you?

Some zeroed in on this with lots of time, like Carpe did on the plastic bag... that was Carpe, wasn't it???


Title: Re: Pictures
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:07:06 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Well, we all were looking at the casino pict of Paulus awhile back and I thought I had seen other pictures of him there with different camera angles.. you know, cameras in the casino ceiling and others over the shoulder of the the one we have now.  

I thought I had seen them here whenever they came out, but now, maybe like dkpen I saw them on TV

I just know I saw other views of him... for I am "into" camera angles out of past experiences. I have been told by dear friends, I am not a good one to watch TV with or go to a movie for I see mistakes and different things because of being in the Industry for a while.

I am glad dkpen mentioned this for I thought I was "dreaming" or reading too long about the case. You know, the feeling you know and yet you can't put your finger on from just "when and where"

Some things I can't blame on "Senior Moments" for they are etched into the brain about Natalee.


IBE - I believe this is the entire video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA3NKpGHnqc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:09:33 AM
Maybe we, when this is all over, can have a list like the credits they run at the end of the movie??? I really get confused over who to thank for what area of research done.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:11:30 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Maybe we, when this is all over, can have a list like the credits they run at the end of the movie??? I really get confused over who to thank for what area of research done.

LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:14:42 AM
Tidycat - I see you lurking  :wink:  Check the holiday avatar thread  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:17:43 AM
Oh I just got back from Carpe's photo album...Lala's, if you're still here, I also thought "Lala's" was your dog!  How funny!!  Sorry....  :roll:

IBE, I had a copy of the photo of Beth crying when she got that bad news about Natalee.  Unfortunately I lost it when my computer was stolen last July along with a lot of other good photos.  I would have thought Klaas would have it all.

I was amazed to see Carpe's analyses of the "bag" photos.  

Good night to all.


Title: Re: Pictures
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 01:17:46 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "IBE"
Well, we all were looking at the casino pict of Paulus awhile back and I thought I had seen other pictures of him there with different camera angles.. you know, cameras in the casino ceiling and others over the shoulder of the the one we have now.  

I thought I had seen them here whenever they came out, but now, maybe like dkpen I saw them on TV

I just know I saw other views of him... for I am "into" camera angles out of past experiences. I have been told by dear friends, I am not a good one to watch TV with or go to a movie for I see mistakes and different things because of being in the Industry for a while.

I am glad dkpen mentioned this for I thought I was "dreaming" or reading too long about the case. You know, the feeling you know and yet you can't put your finger on from just "when and where"

Some things I can't blame on "Senior Moments" for they are etched into the brain about Natalee.


IBE - I believe this is the entire video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA3NKpGHnqc



Nope, this isn't the entire video. It didn't even show Natalee on the phone or pointing towards Joran in this video.

The part I am speaking of shows Paulus standing on right side of the pole, facing the dealer, smiling and appears to be speaking to the dealer. Then the clip cuts and it starts showing them all sitting around the table.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:19:17 AM
I'll see if I can find another clip of the video then DKPen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:19:44 AM
Hey Rooscrew!!!  Long time....    It's good to see you!!  Good night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:21:03 AM
Hi Klaas!!!   Thanks!  I'll go look!!
 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 01:21:17 AM
Quote from: "Rooscrew"
DK and other monkeys who feel they might go unnoticed or ignored.

I read everything that is posted, please don't think you aren't important. Sometimes, the pages go by so fast and some of us are trying to catch up to be in realtime posting and by the time we get caught up everybody has gone. Also, alot of times by the time I get caught up everything has been hashed out and the questions I had come to mind have been asked and answered by then.  I do read your posts as I think you have lots of good material that comes into discussions. :) So, please know that you are just as important as anybody else is here and your input is just as valuable. :)
 
Roos~


Thank you Roos...very nice of you too say.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:21:30 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'll see if I can find another clip of the video then DKPen.


The only ones I'm finding is the ones Scux added to Youtube and I don't think they have everything you are looking for.  

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=holloway+casino


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rooscrew on May 07, 2007, 01:22:22 AM
Quote from: "tidycat"
Hey Rooscrew!!!  Long time....    It's good to see you!!  Good night!


Great to see you back Tidy!!  :)  

Roos~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 01:23:52 AM
G'Night everyone..and as always...

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rooscrew on May 07, 2007, 01:25:24 AM
Goodnight DK & Tidy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:25:31 AM
Nite DKPen


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:26:30 AM
Ok, I had to come back and show off!  Thank you Klaas!!!  Big smooch!

Roos, it's nice to see so many of the monks posting again!  Love ya, and good night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:27:22 AM
Nite DKPen!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:27:30 AM
Hi Klaas

Firefox won't let me open another window to get back here while downlaoding the video so I an using another browser.

I thought there was another camera angle but I could be wrong... at 56 k it's taking a long time to get the video on UTube...

Can it be saved on my HD after it loads??? about an hour from now. It's only up to 1 minute now!

In this first minute of this video it has the camera up over the left shoulder of the dealer. I would think there was a camera over the cashier in the middle and another pointing over to right shouder of the dealer.

I'll have a birthday before this loads in (Sept11) :lol:  :lol: [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:32:16 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Hi Klaas

Firefox won't let me open another window to get back here while downlaoding the video so I an using another browser.

I thought there was another camera angle but I could be wrong... at 56 k it's taking a long time to get the video on UTube...

Can it be saved on my HD after it loads??? about an hour from now. It's only up to 1 minute now!

In this first minute of this video it has the camera up over the left shoulder of the dealer. I would think there was a camera over the cashier in the middle and another pointing over to right shouder of the dealer.

I'll have a birthday before this loads in (Sept11) :lol:  :lol: [/b]


No I don't think you can save it unless you have video capturing software.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:33:05 AM
BRB - need to dry my hair

Tidy  - you look very festive!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
Klaas:  
Quote
Tidy - you look very festive! Laughing


 :D  :D   Thanks!  Thanks to you!   I am actually quite a patriotic person and this is now my fav avatar.  I may never change it, except at Christmas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: sirensong on May 07, 2007, 01:38:30 AM
Quote from: "Rooscrew"
DK and other monkeys who feel they might go unnoticed or ignored.

I read everything that is posted, please don't think you aren't important. Sometimes, the pages go by so fast and some of us are trying to catch up to be in realtime posting and by the time we get caught up everybody has gone. Also, alot of times by the time I get caught up everything has been hashed out and the questions I had come to mind have been asked and answered by then.  I do read your posts as I think you have lots of good material that comes into discussions. :) So, please know that you are just as important as anybody else is here and your input is just as valuable. :)
 
Roos~




Me too!  What Roos said! i mostly lurk and value everyone's input.  By the time I think of something, one of the monkeys has already said it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:38:49 AM
Well, I think I'll emulate Lala's and hug Nemo, if I may, and say good night for the last time.  Sweet dreams everyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: casa on May 07, 2007, 01:39:26 AM
ok, some get "good night," "good to see you," etc.  others are just here i guess. night to all who are still here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:40:15 AM
Oops!  Hello Sirensong!  I don't believe we've met, since I've been away for quite awhile.  It's very nice to make your acquaintance, and hope I'll see you again soon!  'nite!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:41:03 AM
Quote from: "casa"
ok, some get "good night," "good to see you," etc.  others are just here i guess. night to all who are still here.


Nite Casa - it's always great to see you and I hope you have a good night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:41:28 AM
Hey Casa!  You get good night from me!  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:42:16 AM
Tidy - if you are leaving good night to you too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:42:56 AM
Oh, and Casa, please don't mind me, I didn't "see" you!  My vision has gotten worse in the last few months!   lol!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: tidycat on May 07, 2007, 01:43:38 AM
Nite Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:45:14 AM
Quote from: "sirensong"
Quote from: "Rooscrew"
DK and other monkeys who feel they might go unnoticed or ignored.

I read everything that is posted, please don't think you aren't important. Sometimes, the pages go by so fast and some of us are trying to catch up to be in realtime posting and by the time we get caught up everybody has gone. Also, alot of times by the time I get caught up everything has been hashed out and the questions I had come to mind have been asked and answered by then.  I do read your posts as I think you have lots of good material that comes into discussions. :) So, please know that you are just as important as anybody else is here and your input is just as valuable. :)
 
Roos~




Me too!  What Roos said! i mostly lurk and value everyone's input.  By the time I think of something, one of the monkeys has already said it!


Ditto to the above.  Also for me I'm always reading another site, moderating the front page or checking out other areas of this forum.  Then I also check for any updates on Aruban or Dutch websites throughout the day.  Often times I miss when people come into the forum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:45:45 AM
Well, it's over 5 min and I am half there!

Wasn't there some place we have this in frames? I have to listen to Joran and watch his smirk. Gads!

This could be it for someone could zero in on Paulus's watch from these frames.

Think I am getting a little tired. Gads it loads in in the buffers and I hear his voice when not expecting it!

Do I have to register to save it in "my favorites?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:47:49 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Well, it's over 5 min and I am half there!

Wasn't there some place we have this in frames? I have to listen to Joran and watch his smirk. Gads!

This could be it for someone could zero in on Paulus's watch from these frames.

Think I am getting a little tired. Gads it loads in in the buffers and I hear his voice when not expecting it!

Do I have to register to save it in "my favorites?

We have some frames saved but you've seen all those.  I don't remember one where PVDS is standing up though.  Just turn your sound off, that's what I do, LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:48:43 AM
Remember in the beginning of this Thread or the last one, Monkeys were asking who is the tall man in the photo when Paulus and Joran are showing being left out of jail and at a press annoc..? Then someone said it was the same man that Anita was kicking?

Could it be Lorenzo?? Just had to put that in here :lol:

I wouldn't think she would kick an attorney? but could a step son?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 01:52:45 AM
Did someone say he stood up? It is still loading in a window behind the one I am writing to you on,

Tonight was serious but funny too.. I labeled some of the pages Shoe Humor 1, 2 etc[

think I'll call it a night. Will keep checking in until it loads fully tho. Sometimes, it's hard to let go :lol: on Pacific Time!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:53:23 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Remember in the beginning of this Thread or the last one, Monkeys were asking who is the tall man in the photo when Paulus and Joran are showing being left out of jail and at a press annoc..? Then someone said it was the same man that Anita was kicking?

Could it be Lorenzo?? Just had to put that in here :lol:

I wouldn't think she would kick an attorney? but could a step son?

I really don't think so.  Lorenzo would never allow his photo to be taken, LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:54:04 AM
Nite IBE

I think I'll go play a couple games  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 02:00:09 AM
Quote
Paulus Van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005

On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time. Joran, with my permission, took over my seat because he had been eliminated earlier.


Interesting.  In the beginning the story was that the boys were with Momma....

Now we have both Sebastian and Val at the house?

So, given the fact that we all agree that paulus is the one in the casino video we should all look at it this way...:

throw out everything Joran and Paulus has said and start over.  they have given a lot of half truths and it is very difficult to pin down which half is truth and which half is fiction....so assume it is all a lie and work with more forensic facts like the video, calls, etc...

secondly, arrest and bring in for questions BOTH younger brothers.  They half to know something including the fact that Paulus was not at home like he says he was, right?  Besides that will make both him and Anita sweat more....

Third, assume the size 14 shoe(s) are a plant to try to cover for the true missing shoe....

Fourth, given this new information take some more strong looks at the Shango/Simian posts ... see if these facts are encrypted there....

fifth, assume someone very very high up is the real Dirty Hands....

sixth, assume that this investigation has much deeper roots into perhaps organized crime and U.S. national security....

I believe it is possible that Shango is a U.S. agent who didn't have any other means to help let the truth out than through the posts we have seen and may also very well be the individual who leaked the video (do you realize how difficult it would be to get a copy of that thing?  let alone smuggle it out of casino security?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rooscrew on May 07, 2007, 02:05:37 AM
Goodnight Casa!

Goodnight to all the other monkeys & lurkers out there.....

Hopefully, we'll get some good news soon!  Monkeys Rock!

Roos~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 02:12:43 AM
Hi guys! Will someone please take pity on me and tell me if it's now established that Joran's brothers WERE at home the night Nat went missing???

I guess I haven't gone back far enough to figure that out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 02:17:20 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi guys! Will someone please take pity on me and tell me if it's now established that Joran's brothers WERE at home the night Nat went missing???

I guess I haven't gone back far enough to figure that out.

I don't think we know for sure.  I believe Val was home, not sure about Sebastian.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 07, 2007, 02:22:29 AM
IBE - is this the screen capture you are looking for?

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Casinocluseupmysteryman.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 07, 2007, 02:23:58 AM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/CasinoNataleepoints.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 07, 2007, 02:26:21 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi guys! Will someone please take pity on me and tell me if it's now established that Joran's brothers WERE at home the night Nat went missing???

I guess I haven't gone back far enough to figure that out.


Sorry, CBB - if it was established I missed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sleuth on May 07, 2007, 02:27:27 AM
G'Night monkeys (and G'Day Tib).  Let's hope that tomorrow brings resolution for Natalee's family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 02:43:08 AM
Yes, it is the one with the watch. Someone spent a lot of time zero-ing on that watch and was trying to prove it was Paulus's watch, arm (besides the hair) frame by frame but I don't know whether it was here or on FP or where now.

Brain is in a blur......Thanks to all of you, IBE opps.. you don't make my brain a blur :lol:

I say it a different way... Thank you, Monkeys for all your Good Works.

PS Whomever Shango is, I hope he/she is safe. I did hours of research on what he said and then it was said it was based on Marvel Comics which I hadn't ever read!

We sure learn here!
Monkey addiction:
I have been reading here and doing YouTube that I am trying to watching a TV show about lakes blowing up and missed almost all of it! They were talking about the CO2 at Mammoth Lakes in CA and how it killed some people in 2006. As a hobby I used to monitor the earthquakes and CO2 there about a decade ago... it was rising fast in certain areas but not much press over it for it is such a tourist place.

Still laughing over the shoe humor here tonight. I know the discussion was serious, but it was funny at the same time!

Can't say we don't engage our hands, brains, and feet here and aiming for Justice for Natalee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: IBE on May 07, 2007, 02:52:11 AM
It's hard for me here to remember even from page to page on info and who puts it here... Brain fog

SilverFox... yes, especially the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth ones!

Thanks Slueth and all,  Good night. At least I can see the last of the TV..."Killer Lakes"

 :roll: Hope I don't have nightmares... most of mine are my dog is old and I worry and moving and earthquakes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 03:00:25 AM
Quote from: Silverfox
Quote
Paulus Van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005

On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time. Joran, with my permission, took over my seat because he had been eliminated earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 05:47:49 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/CasinoNataleepoints.jpg)


You notice in the frame that Natalee looks repulsed in her conversation with Paulus -- look at her body language -- when you look at the video notice she is as far away from him as she can get without sitting on her girlfriend's lap.

Also, I heard that these videos also have audio, is that true?  Perhaps an audio engineer can pick up on what is being said at that table -- or maybe the police have already done this and it is part of the overall evidence that is mounting against PVDS and his son.

Can anyone reference the original sources where it was said the younger boys were with their mother?  in light of Paulus' police statement we might have something very interesting here....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Leslie on May 07, 2007, 07:00:48 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 08:09:52 AM
Quote from: "*******"
I dont think Joran is 6'5..Maybee 6'3-6'4



My son is 6'3" and wears a size 10.5 shoe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 08:18:58 AM
This guy is all over the party scene in Aruba.  The Dutch need to have a long talk with him and apply pressure.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo12.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 08:24:30 AM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "*******"
I dont think Joran is 6'5..Maybee 6'3-6'4



My son is 6'3" and wears a size 10.5 shoe


I measured my foot this morning and it is just shy of 11 inches from toe to heel.  A shoe chart says I should wear an 11, but I like a 10.5 wide.  I don't like much excess shoe at the toe.  The chart says a 12" foot should wear asize 14.  That's not a huge difference in actual foot size.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 08:25:29 AM
Mambo Jambo cu Dj Diablo

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo9.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 08:33:04 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
This guy is all over the party scene in Aruba.  The Dutch need to have a long talk with him and apply pressure.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo12.jpg)


What is it that his T-shirt says?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 08:40:44 AM
"Alibi For Sale"

I don't know.  Was just looking for some one familiar in the recent Diario photo albums and he keeps popping up.  Never did trust that guy....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 08:49:28 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
This guy is all over the party scene in Aruba.  The Dutch need to have a long talk with him and apply pressure.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo12.jpg)


Easy, notice the hat.. Che What's his name, the communist...Looks like he's all ready for Chavez...

Chavez gets a hold of Aruba, and the lawless will really run that Island. (well, more so anyway!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 08:50:01 AM
Good Morning Everyone!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 08:52:12 AM
Quote from: "Silverfox"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
This guy is all over the party scene in Aruba.  The Dutch need to have a long talk with him and apply pressure.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo12.jpg)


What is it that his T-shirt says?


SF- I don't know.. too many letters look to be missing, but there is an arrow pointing down over his gut toward his crotch...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 08:54:08 AM
Riba is the middle word.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 08:55:18 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
This guy is all over the party scene in Aruba.  The Dutch need to have a long talk with him and apply pressure.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo12.jpg)


Easy, notice the hat.. Che What's his name, the communist...Looks like he's all ready for Chavez...

Chavez gets a hold of Aruba, and the lawless will really run that Island. (well, more so anyway!)


Little do they know that the party would be over if Chavez took over that island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 08:55:53 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Riba is the middle word.


= come across

???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 07, 2007, 08:57:34 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
This guy is all over the party scene in Aruba.  The Dutch need to have a long talk with him and apply pressure.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/mambojambo12.jpg)


Easy, notice the hat.. Che What's his name, the communist...Looks like he's all ready for Chavez...

Chavez gets a hold of Aruba, and the lawless will really run that Island. (well, more so anyway!)


Che Guevara :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 09:04:13 AM
Morning monkeys.

I *think* riba means "on" or some similar preposition.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 09:12:07 AM
At a different party.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/overboard11.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 07, 2007, 09:13:52 AM
Quote from: "Rooscrew"
DK and other monkeys who feel they might go unnoticed or ignored.

I read everything that is posted, please don't think you aren't important. Sometimes, the pages go by so fast and some of us are trying to catch up to be in realtime posting and by the time we get caught up everybody has gone. Also, alot of times by the time I get caught up everything has been hashed out and the questions I had come to mind have been asked and answered by then.  I do read your posts as I think you have lots of good material that comes into discussions. :) So, please know that you are just as important as anybody else is here and your input is just as valuable. :)
 
Roos~


Hi sweetie!  I know what ya mean.  I read everything. I bookmark when I leave or switch locations and read everything.  I try to sound like I'm keeping up!  It's hard when I'm reading to catch up because I want to respond but I know I'm 20 pages behind and it will look like I'm talking to myself....... :roll:

I don't think anybody is ignoring anybody else.  Sometimes there are just a lot of thoughts circling around and people looking at one thing and another.   I don't think anyone means to ignore anyone else.  Sometimes, I know the answer but I also know someone has the pictures to go with it.  Rambling.........

Good morning to all.  Working and lurking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 07, 2007, 09:19:40 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Rooscrew"
DK and other monkeys who feel they might go unnoticed or ignored.

I read everything that is posted, please don't think you aren't important. Sometimes, the pages go by so fast and some of us are trying to catch up to be in realtime posting and by the time we get caught up everybody has gone. Also, alot of times by the time I get caught up everything has been hashed out and the questions I had come to mind have been asked and answered by then.  I do read your posts as I think you have lots of good material that comes into discussions. :) So, please know that you are just as important as anybody else is here and your input is just as valuable. :)
 
Roos~


Hi sweetie!  I know what ya mean.  I read everything. I bookmark when I leave or switch locations and read everything.  I try to sound like I'm keeping up!  It's hard when I'm reading to catch up because I want to respond but I know I'm 20 pages behind and it will look like I'm talking to myself....... :roll:

I don't think anybody is ignoring anybody else.  Sometimes there are just a lot of thoughts circling around and people looking at one thing and another.   I don't think anyone means to ignore anyone else.  Sometimes, I know the answer but I also know someone has the pictures to go with it.  Rambling.........

Good morning to all.  Working and lurking.


Hi Peaches and all other monkeys.

It's the same with me. If I'm trying to get caught up I don't respond, cause I know I'll be talking about things that have already been wrapped up. We all feel ignored sometimes. I've asked a lot of questions lately that no one responded to, but I know if they knew the answers they would have.

Working and lurking here too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 09:30:16 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "*******"
I dont think Joran is 6'5..Maybee 6'3-6'4



My son is 6'3" and wears a size 10.5 shoe


I measured my foot this morning and it is just shy of 11 inches from toe to heel.  A shoe chart says I should wear an 11, but I like a 10.5 wide.  I don't like much excess shoe at the toe.  The chart says a 12" foot should wear asize 14.  That's not a huge difference in actual foot size.


that's an important point Easy, plus here in the US K-Swiss is widely considered to be a true tennis shoe and does have a wider toe as opposed to a cross training Nike or similar.

my mother made me learn to sew which I'm grateful for now, it's also interesting to note that within clothing sizes rule of thumb it's only 1/4" addition at every major or joining seam which constitutes the next size up? That isn't a large metric either......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 09:33:12 AM
gosh I know everyone is busy and at times I don't think anyone intends to ignore others, but I guess this is a chance to be reminded of the goal to include all.

Morning Peaches, MsMarples, Easy, BT.... everyone have a great Monday, back to work for me too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 09:37:06 AM
heck it appears I just ignored two others  :oops:

Morning BB and Rob !

back to work....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 07, 2007, 09:39:30 AM
Hi None. Bye None.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 07, 2007, 09:44:23 AM
Morning monkeys.... :D

Working and lurking and reading overnight posts.....
I don't ever get on a soapbox....but I do not think we are
really here for recognition....everyone gets passed over....
sometimes I really think something is important and I sit
and wait for an answer and there is none.....so then I
go off looking on google for the answer...this leads to a
lot of searching and I am back an hour later....catching up again...
if we learn one or two things a day, the day was worth it....
like the picture collage of Paulus yesterday....now I am positive....
in my own mind....the man was there....important piece of info...!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 07, 2007, 09:48:31 AM
The significance of the shoes is not what size Joran actually wore but what size he claimed to wear.  It is likely he planted Size 14 shoes at the beach to try to establish that as proof that he and Natalee were actually there and that is where he left her.

A sort of proof, if you will, physical evidence they were actually there.

It's not about Joran's feet.  It's about his attempt to establish the beach as the crime scene, proving it by claiming to have left shoes there.  Someone was supposed to find the shoes and then everybody say, see, they really were there after all.

He did NOT go home barefoot, etc.

Yes, shoe sizes are in small increments but I still don't thnk anybody who actually wears a Size 14 would ever select a size 10.5 for a new pair.  That's the size his new ones at KIA were.  Was he expecting his feet to shrink?

But I do think he may well have left Size 14's at the beach near the fisherman's hut.  They could have been any size that it was conceivable Joran would wear.

Adoronron has an excellent theory for where he got those shoes, too, the racket club,  Unfortunately for the Sporter, someone found them and took them home instead of turning them in as the evidence he needed.

But imagine if those shoes had been found neatly on the beach just as he claimed.  Wouldn't that really give support for his claims to have left Natalee there, looking at the stars on a cloudy night?  Complete innocence established.

More attempt to move the crime scene from the Sloot compound to the beach.

It's not about what size his feet were.  And there was supposed to have been a bloody tennis shoe but wasn't that determined to be Joran's blood very early?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 09:51:20 AM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

What Did Deepak Kalpoe Know about Natalee Holloway and When?


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/05/07/what-did-deepak-kalpoe-know-about-natalee-holloway-and-when/


NOTE:  When Red puts "hat tip klaas" on the front page posts, he is not attributing the article to me but any visuals (photos, gifs, videos) I may have put together to go along with the front page post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 07, 2007, 09:54:59 AM
Off to work. . .

have a glorious day, Monkeys!

Anna


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 09:55:13 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
The significance of the shoes is not what size Joran actually wore but what size he claimed to wear.  It is likely he planted Size 14 shoes at the beach to try to establish that as proof that he and Natalee were actually there and that is where he left her.

A sort of proof, if you will, physical evidence they were actually there.

It's not about Joran's feet.  It's about his attempt to establish the beach as the crime scene, proving it by claiming to have left shoes there.  Someone was supposed to find the shoes and then everybody say, see, they really were there after all.

He did NOT go home barefoot, etc.

Yes, shoe sizes are in small increments but I still don't thnk anybody who actually wears a Size 14 would ever select a size 10.5 for a new pair.  That's the size his new ones at KIA were.  Was he expecting his feet to shrink?

But I do think he may well have left Size 14's at the beach near the fisherman's hut.  They could have been any size that it was conceivable Joran would wear.

Adoronron has an excellent theory for where he got those shoes, too, the racket club,  Unfortunately for the Sporter, someone found them and took them home instead of turning them in as the evidence he needed.

But imagine if those shoes had been found neatly on the beach just as he claimed.  Wouldn't that really give support for his claims to have left Natalee there, looking at the stars on a cloudy night?  Complete innocence established.

More attempt to move the crime scene from the Sloot compound to the beach.

It's not about what size his feet were.  And there was supposed to have been a bloody tennis shoe but wasn't that determined to be Joran's blood very early?

.


That is the clearest explanation I've read so far for the shoe discrepancy.  So was Freddy sent out to buy a pair to "plant"?

GOODMORNING ALL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 07, 2007, 10:01:13 AM
Anna...your thoughts on the "bottom line" re the shoes is so clear....thanks.... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 10:02:49 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
The significance of the shoes is not what size Joran actually wore but what size he claimed to wear.  It is likely he planted Size 14 shoes at the beach to try to establish that as proof that he and Natalee were actually there and that is where he left her.

A sort of proof, if you will, physical evidence they were actually there.

It's not about Joran's feet.  It's about his attempt to establish the beach as the crime scene, proving it by claiming to have left shoes there.  Someone was supposed to find the shoes and then everybody say, see, they really were there after all.

He did NOT go home barefoot, etc.

Yes, shoe sizes are in small increments but I still don't thnk anybody who actually wears a Size 14 would ever select a size 10.5 for a new pair.  That's the size his new ones at KIA were.  Was he expecting his feet to shrink?

But I do think he may well have left Size 14's at the beach near the fisherman's hut.  They could have been any size that it was conceivable Joran would wear.

Adoronron has an excellent theory for where he got those shoes, too, the racket club,  Unfortunately for the Sporter, someone found them and took them home instead of turning them in as the evidence he needed.

But imagine if those shoes had been found neatly on the beach just as he claimed.  Wouldn't that really give support for his claims to have left Natalee there, looking at the stars on a cloudy night?  Complete innocence established.

More attempt to move the crime scene from the Sloot compound to the beach.

It's not about what size his feet were.  And there was supposed to have been a bloody tennis shoe but wasn't that determined to be Joran's blood very early?

.


i like this

 BUT

if it turns out he actually wears size 14
then this is needs to be reworked  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 10:08:56 AM
If the shoes were stolen from the beach, it also could explain why he believes there was someone on the beach.... the shoe thief..

It also could explain why the person, if they were stolen, did not turn them in.

Who wants to be holding evidence in the case????
it could at a minimum cost you 8 pleasant days at KIA.

Klaas, I'm trying to tie something together here...do we know for a fact that the 'call(s)' do-es exist? I have heard a few conflicting things on this...

One call to classmate...William Morris????

One call to Beth...'I don't know these guys / people' ~ this call got Beth speeding and pulled over by the state trooper, who listened to the call, and escorted her to the state line... where she was joined by the state police of that state. Arkansas to Alabama????

Time approx 3 am.

Are either of these calls real?

If they are, it nails Paulus' ass to the wall.

If J2K (or J + Deepak and unknown person) are at the racquet club at 3 am per the gardener, then it looks like they are getting fake evidence to plant on the beach...

This puts Paulus totally alone in the house as he said he was there at that time...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 10:14:47 AM
The translation/summary of Joran's book, Chapter 5 titled Girlfriends is now in the Important Case Document forum:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1117

Rob - I'm not sure about the calls


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 10:17:00 AM
Morning monkeys. On my second cup of coffee and already the cage is jumping with info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 07, 2007, 10:17:24 AM
Good Morning Monkeys.  Good to see you all.  I have been out of the loop for a few days, been out of commission due to a family member's wedding.  A Beautiful Event.

Working and lurking as usual.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 07, 2007, 10:17:43 AM
I feel IMHO,that the shoes were hidden later.Art Wood pointed out the sand would cut your feet up,along with the cacti.I think val was at the house,bring him and book him.Someone will talk then.They are all scum and they disgust me.Sorry to mince words,but I don't want to offend.They are an ugly group.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 10:25:14 AM
Joran needs to sue the ghost writer, because so far this book is garbage!  It reads like a childish entry into a bad diary.  I like her, she like me, we don't like no more, next....  ARGH!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 10:25:16 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Rob - I'm not sure about the calls


OK thank you... I'll just put it aside for now.

Good Morning Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 10:25:44 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Joran needs to sue the ghost writer, because so far this book is garbage!  It reads like a childish entry into a bad diary.  I like her, she like me, we don't like no more, next....  ARGH!


 :lol:  :lol:

I wonder who David is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 10:34:06 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Joran needs to sue the ghost writer, because so far this book is garbage!  It reads like a childish entry into a bad diary.  I like her, she like me, we don't like no more, next....  ARGH!


 :lol:  :lol:

I wonder who David is.


Probably just another young dumba$$ living in Aruba.

The whole book thing just turns my stomach and is so transparent.  How this kid pulled one on anybody is beyond me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 10:38:03 AM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline5.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 10:39:24 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
<snip>
Klaas, I'm trying to tie something together here...do we know for a fact that the 'call(s)' do-es exist? I have heard a few conflicting things on this...

One call to classmate...William Morris????

One call to Beth...'I don't know these guys / people' ~ this call got Beth speeding and pulled over by the state trooper, who listened to the call, and escorted her to the state line... where she was joined by the state police of that state. Arkansas to Alabama????

Time approx 3 am.

Are either of these calls real?

If they are, it nails Paulus' ass to the wall.

If J2K (or J + Deepak and unknown person) are at the racquet club at 3 am per the gardener, then it looks like they are getting fake evidence to plant on the beach...

This puts Paulus totally alone in the house as he said he was there at that time...


Rob - Beth has said out loud, to a room full of people, that there were NO PHONE CALLS TO or FROM Natalee during the trip.

The William Morris call (the one C Croes listened to) was from a Florida area code. There was "no human vocalization" on it.

I know this phone call thing dies hard, but I really think she tried to put it to rest. It is one thing for sure the FBI could investigate.

One of the things she stresses in these talks to travelers she's doing, is to take your cell phone, get international calling, and keep the phone with you at all times.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on May 07, 2007, 10:40:02 AM
This case has been solved within the first 24- 48 hours!  What is taking the blinking Dutch & Arubans so long? Paulus calling in his favors, the time lost looking at the security guards?  The lost or intentionally mis-diagnosed evidence?

Pick a theory.  Any theory.  Joran & Paulus are guilty.  There is evidence to be found at the vd Slut's compound even 2 years later or they wouldn't ave gotten a search warrat 2 years later.  Aruba is scared.   Paulus is sweating, Joran is pooping his pants, and Anita is furious.

Anyway, just wanted to say a quick hello.  Then its off to the hospital for a CT scan of my abdomen & pelvis looking for why my right groin hurts all the time.  It has hurt since after my first surgery, what I complained about the pain even before I eviscerated.  I think its a hernia myself, but I'm no Doctor.  WAIT - I am!  LOL.

I'm just sick of these tests and Dr's appointments out the yingyang.  That little trip to the hospital in Cardiac CCU overnight has cost over $16K already.  Bills still arriving.

Went to a surgeon to cut a growth off my right arm.  Has to be done as an outpatient.  PITA.

My blood pressure was up to 180/110.  Arghhhh!  My main Doc is weaning me off some meds - bad withdrawal- but hasn't put me on anything new yet, which is causing the spike in BP.  Never had high BP in my life.  It's the withdrawal of meds.

Anyway, send a few prayers my way and for Cherokee too!  Going to meet with the lawyer this week.  And this is suppossed to be the best year of my life. Age = year born.

I love you, I miss you.  I pray for you and Natalee's loved ones.

Keep the faith.

Gotta run.  I'll keep you posted!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 10:40:03 AM
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 10:41:55 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Joran needs to sue the ghost writer, because so far this book is garbage!  It reads like a childish entry into a bad diary.  I like her, she like me, we don't like no more, next....  ARGH!


 :lol:  :lol:

I wonder who David is.


Is this David on Aruba? or he is another 'Marco'???

I know a David on Aruba that hangs by Bahia  .. he has a star of David tattoo on his neck...

cant be the same person...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 10:45:25 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
This case has been solved within the first 24- 48 hours!  What is taking the blinking Dutch & Arubans so long? Paulus calling in his favors, the time lost looking at the security guards?  The lost or intentionally mis-diagnosed evidence?

Pick a theory.  Any theory.  Joran & Paulus are guilty.  There is evidence to be found at the vd Slut's compound even 2 years later or they wouldn't ave gotten a search warrat 2 years later.  Aruba is scared.   Paulus is sweating, Joran is pooping his pants, and Anita is furious.

Anyway, just wanted to say a quick hello.  Then its off to the hospital for a CT scan of my abdomen & pelvis looking for why my right groin hurts all the time.  It has hurt since after my first surgery, what I complained about the pain even before I eviscerated.  I think its a hernia myself, but I'm no Doctor.  WAIT - I am!  LOL.

I'm just sick of these tests and Dr's appointments out the yingyang.  That little trip to the hospital in Cardiac CCU overnight has cost over $16K already.  Bills still arriving.

Went to a surgeon to cut a growth off my right arm.  Has to be done as an outpatient.  PITA.

My blood pressure was up to 180/110.  Arghhhh!  My main Doc is weaning me off some meds - bad withdrawal- but hasn't put me on anything new yet, which is causing the spike in BP.  Never had high BP in my life.  It's the withdrawal of meds.

Anyway, send a few prayers my way and for Cherokee too!  Going to meet with the lawyer this week.  And this is suppossed to be the best year of my life. Age = year born.

I love you, I miss you.  I pray for you and Natalee's loved ones.

Keep the faith.

Gotta run.  I'll keep you posted!

Praying for you Sunfreak - sorry you are having to go through so much lately.

Wondering if during your first surgery they left something in there, like a sponge or something?  It's happened before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 10:48:38 AM
The parents of all these kids named in this book have got to be lovin’ this stuff!  You would think at least one father, or brother would want to have a face-to-face chat with Joran. Unless none of them give a chit one way or another.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: shadow on May 07, 2007, 10:52:05 AM
Good morning Monkeys!

re David . . . in the chapter 3 translation a David Fisitalia is introduced as a friend. Funny we've heard of all the other friends before but David is a first for me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 10:52:15 AM
I swear my foot is killing me today and I think it has to do with all the shoe talk!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 10:52:35 AM
Quote from: "shadow"
Good morning Monkeys!

re David . . . in the chapter 3 translation a David Fisitalia is introduced as a friend. Funny we've heard of all the other friends before but David is a first for me.


Thanks Shadow!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 07, 2007, 10:53:08 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I swear my foot is killing me today and I think it has to do with all the shoe talk!   :shock:


It was all that contorting yourself to make it fit your inner arm.  :lol:

(P.S. I LOVE that sock monkey face!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 10:53:11 AM
Good morning everyone,
Trying to catch up and working/lurking. I don't have the time today to try to find the answers to the following so if someone could be so kind as to reply I'd appreciate it.

Did paulus visit the U.S. during the spring/summer of 2005?

Did we ever figure out who Meneses is?

In the Dr Phil document requests, is there a request for the sloot bank records?

The j2k police car converstion........are there any other versions? I'd like to know if there are any conflicts between other translations, if there are other translations.


TIA - Ado
(I'd like a holiday avatar please)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: shadow on May 07, 2007, 10:54:43 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "shadow"
Good morning Monkeys!

re David . . . in the chapter 3 translation a David Fisitalia is introduced as a friend. Funny we've heard of all the other friends before but David is a first for me.


Thanks Shadow!


 :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 10:56:05 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Good morning everyone,
Trying to catch up and working/lurking. I don't have the time today to try to find the answers to the following so if someone could be so kind as to reply I'd appreciate it.

Did paulus visit the U.S. during the spring/summer of 2005?

Did we ever figure out who Meneses is?

In the Dr Phil document requests, is there a request for the sloot bank records?

The j2k police car converstion........are there any other versions? I'd like to know if there are any conflicts between other translations, if there are other translations.


TIA - Ado
(I'd like a holiday avatar please)


#1 - Paullus visit US - I don't know
#2 - Meneses, I think Jossy's people are still looking
#3 - I'll look through the documents for bank records

The police car translations I think there are 2.  One from Arubagirl and one from Getagrip.  I'm not sure about the descrepancies, I think there were a couple.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 10:57:15 AM
MsMarple- I realize that there has been an attempt to straighten out the record regarding the calls.

And that is why I asked if there was any validity to them.. because I'm not even sure.

In the beginning of the case...there seems to be a record of Beth saying she was speeding to get home...I don't think I imagined that. I also recall she gave the trooper the phone to listen to it... now maybe things have changed and I do not have all the correct info. That is possible.

If there wasn't a call, how did Beth or the trooper get the info that Natalee was kidnapped? I doubt a trooper would give an escort to the state line based on nothing but someone's word. They hear every story in the book from people trying to avoid a ticket.

I obviously do not mean to bring up something that is settled or distract anyone from something else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 10:58:37 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 11:03:25 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


Rob,
When was the sample taken?

Ado


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:03:58 AM
A quick question...where is the info that states that Joran picked up Paulus at the airport on May 29th?  Is it in one of the statements?  Having a senior moment here. TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:05:21 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I swear my foot is killing me today and I think it has to do with all the shoe talk!   :shock:


It was all that contorting yourself to make it fit your inner arm.  :lol:

(P.S. I LOVE that sock monkey face!)


I must have contorted a toe out of place!  Think I will get some bigger shoes now. lol

Not sure where I found that monkey face. lol lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: shadow on May 07, 2007, 11:05:30 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Good morning everyone,
Trying to catch up and working/lurking. I don't have the time today to try to find the answers to the following so if someone could be so kind as to reply I'd appreciate it.

Did paulus visit the U.S. during the spring/summer of 2005?

Did we ever figure out who Meneses is?

In the Dr Phil document requests, is there a request for the sloot bank records?

The j2k police car converstion........are there any other versions? I'd like to know if there are any conflicts between other translations, if there are other translations.


TIA - Ado
(I'd like a holiday avatar please)


There has been some discussion that Paulus went to Florida soon after Natalee's disappearance, but to my knowledge that has not been confirmed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 11:05:31 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


Rob,
When was the sample taken?

Ado


Ado- I have no idea what sample is being referenced. I'm sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:05:45 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


In the Dr. Phil motion to compel there is a woman by the name of Haley Segona:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/haleysegona.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/haleysegona1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:06:53 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
A quick question...where is the info that states that Joran picked up Paulus at the airport on May 29th?  Is it in one of the statements?  Having a senior moment here. TIA

I don't think it's in any statement.  I think it was something we were told in the beginning of the case, probably by Bondia  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:07:49 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
MsMarple- I realize that there has been an attempt to straighten out the record regarding the calls.

And that is why I asked if there was any validity to them.. because I'm not even sure.

In the beginning of the case...there seems to be a record of Beth saying she was speeding to get home...I don't think I imagined that. I also recall she gave the trooper the phone to listen to it... now maybe things have changed and I do not have all the correct info. That is possible.

If there wasn't a call, how did Beth or the trooper get the info that Natalee was kidnapped? I doubt a trooper would give an escort to the state line based on nothing but someone's word. They hear every story in the book from people trying to avoid a ticket.

I obviously do not mean to bring up something that is settled or distract anyone from something else.


I don't know for certain, but I seem to remember Beth saying on television that she knew Natalee had been kidnapped.  I can't say or don't remember if she said how she was certain.  I, like you, remember it all happened during that frantic trip from Arkansas to Alabama.  IIRC she was informed that Natalee did not return to her group and had missed her flight. Beth related this story on one of the news shows.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:08:23 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


There is reference to the woman in that 171 pdf file and that was the first I heard of such a thing.  I think she lived in the north east and should be in her late 30's or early 40's.  I couldn't get the connection.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:10:06 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
A quick question...where is the info that states that Joran picked up Paulus at the airport on May 29th?  Is it in one of the statements?  Having a senior moment here. TIA

I don't think it's in any statement.  I think it was something we were told in the beginning of the case, probably by Bondia  :roll:


So we can put that notion to rest also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 11:10:56 AM
I'm sure that everyone has noticed, but there are more questions each and every day and no one on Aruba to set the record straight. I guess that is the plan.. what else could it be.

The KLPD is prolly not going to set it all completely straight.. they seem interested in physical evidence.. and if they find some, we might see an arrest or two, but they are probably not going to get into the small details of what is what unless there is a trial...

So we are left to sort out what we know and try to figure out the rest...but that is near impossible as we have more questions arising each day, and don't seem to have the answers to yesterday's questions.

Maybe it's just me, but this is one screwed up case, and it doesn't have to be this way...

There should be someone who has all the facts and presents them as known facts...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:11:29 AM
The urine sample reference can mean only one thing...they were checking for drugs.  Was this person in Aruba at the same time?  How did I miss this?   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 11:12:49 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Rob"
MsMarple- I realize that there has been an attempt to straighten out the record regarding the calls.

And that is why I asked if there was any validity to them.. because I'm not even sure.

In the beginning of the case...there seems to be a record of Beth saying she was speeding to get home...I don't think I imagined that. I also recall she gave the trooper the phone to listen to it... now maybe things have changed and I do not have all the correct info. That is possible.

If there wasn't a call, how did Beth or the trooper get the info that Natalee was kidnapped? I doubt a trooper would give an escort to the state line based on nothing but someone's word. They hear every story in the book from people trying to avoid a ticket.

I obviously do not mean to bring up something that is settled or distract anyone from something else.


I don't know for certain, but I seem to remember Beth saying on television that she knew Natalee had been kidnapped.  I can't say or don't remember if she said how she was certain.  I, like you, remember it all happened during that frantic trip from Arkansas to Alabama.  IIRC she was informed that Natalee did not return to her group and had missed her flight. Beth related this story on one of the news shows.


yep, LaLa's.. that's how I remember it also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 11:13:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


In the Dr. Phil motion to compel there is a woman by the name of Haley Segona:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/haleysegona.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/haleysegona1.jpg)


Sorry Rob, I now see that was Easywriter's question - working/lurking = faulty speed reading :roll:

Easywriter - the only thought I would have on this urine test would be to check for date rape drugs. Maybe she was at C&C's that night and was given a drink by joran, but who knows.

Ado


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 11:14:35 AM
Thanks you Klaas, could she have been drugged?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:15:08 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The urine sample reference can mean only one thing...they were checking for drugs.  Was this person in Aruba at the same time?  How did I miss this?   :roll:


Lala's, I have no idea.  I suppose she must have been.  Seems to me though people have checked and she's not Natalee's age.  Maybe she was one of the Chaperones?  I really don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:15:11 AM
Another question...exactly what ages were Joran's two brothers in May 2005?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:15:18 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did anyone ever figure out the urine sample business with the American woman?  Is there anyway to logically connect that to anything we know?


Easy this is the first I'm hearing about any of this...


In the Dr. Phil motion to compel there is a woman by the name of Haley Segona:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/haleysegona.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/haleysegona1.jpg)


It looks like she was questioned one day and sent for the urine test the next.  This happened a year later, so maybe she was a tourist that thought she had been drugged while in Aruba.  How long do those type drugs show up in the system?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:16:02 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Another question...exactly what ages were Joran's two brothers in May 2005?


11/12 and 14/15 I think.  Val was definately at the pimp in training age.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:16:23 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The urine sample reference can mean only one thing...they were checking for drugs.  Was this person in Aruba at the same time?  How did I miss this?   :roll:


Lala's, I have no idea.  I suppose she must have been.  Seems to me though people have checked and she's not Natalee's age.  Maybe she was one of the Chaperones?  I really don't know.


She lived in New York?  I don't think she was a chaperone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 11:16:24 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The urine sample reference can mean only one thing...they were checking for drugs.  Was this person in Aruba at the same time?  How did I miss this?   :roll:


Lalas,
I wasn't quick enough, But, at least so far the theory of checking for drugs is winning. 8)

Ado


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:17:00 AM
EASY - a year later?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:17:07 AM
I see that her test was indeed taken in June 2005.  Very interesting.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:18:49 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - a year later?


I was wrong.  I first thought it said 06/06/06, but now I see it was in 2005 only days after Natalee disappeared.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:18:55 AM
Date rape drugs are quickly metabolized in the body...traces in urine would only be found within a few hours after ingestion.   That is why it's such a good choice for said purpose.  Now, I am not sure about other drugs.  My question would be what is the comparison being made with should any be found?  Anyone get my drift?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 11:22:29 AM
Rob - I'll see if I can find what Beth said about the call she received that Monday, and whether she said anything about the trooper.

Matt reached Beth on her cell phone; that is how she heard.

For the trooper, Beth probably retrieved the home voice mail box. That is what I *think* I remember. (The chaperone likely called more than one number, but I don't think was able to reach anyone directly.)

klaas - did we post the Q&A session from that meeting? It was on BFN? (I can't access BFN from work.)

I am not trying to suggest that I *know* all about this telephone business, but it was something that I had watched for carefully from the beginning, and I asked several questions about it at that meeting -  including the phrases "I don't know these people" and "Are you calling home?" At the meeting, that is when Beth reminded us of her occupation (speech therapist) and that she is trained to recognize human vocalization attempts ...

No one seems to know how those phrases got into this case ...

There were several possibilities re. calls, but none of them panned out at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 07, 2007, 11:25:18 AM
Could this Hayley Sagona be the woman who posted that she and her husband or companion were drugged and brought to some remote location while in Aruba?  

As was mentioned, the only Hayley that comes up in search in NY was born 1968.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 11:25:20 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Date rape drugs are quickly metabolized in the body...traces in urine would only be found within a few hours after ingestion.   That is why it's such a good choice for said purpose.  Now, I am not sure about other drugs.  My question would be what is the comparison being made with should any be found?  Anyone get my drift?


I don't get your drift. What is it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:25:25 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Rob - I'll see if I can find what Beth said about the call she received that Monday, and whether she said anything about the trooper.

Matt reached Beth on her cell phone; that is how she heard.

For the trooper, Beth probably retrieved the home voice mail box. That is what I *think* I remember. (The chaperone likely called more than one number, but I don't think was able to reach anyone directly.)

klaas - did we post the Q&A session from that meeting? It was on BFN? (I can't access BFN from work.)

I am not trying to suggest that I *know* all about this telephone business, but it was something that I had watched for carefully from the beginning, and I asked several questions about it at that meeting -  including the phrases "I don't know these people" and "Are you calling home?" At the meeting, that is when Beth reminded us of her occupation (speech therapist) and that she is trained to recognize human vocalization attempts ...

No one seems to know how those phrases got into this case ...

There were several possibilities re. calls, but none of them panned out at all.


I'll look for the Q&A, think it's in it's own thread somewhere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:26:43 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Another question...exactly what ages were Joran's two brothers in May 2005?


11/12 and 14/15 I think.  Val was definately at the pimp in training age.


The reason I asked was because even though they are both old enough to be home alone, does it make any sense that Paulus would not, at the very least, go back inside and tell Val what was happening outside the night that Beth and Jug arrived?  Would you not tell your other kids that you were leaving with the police?  Of course, the main reason is that he didn't want anyone to follow him inside that gate.  They would have seen Deepak's car and possibly found the body then.  Reread this statement from PVDS, the obvious attempt at lying is there in black and white. He doesn't go back in to tell Val that he is leaving...he knows better.  He just trots off to a hotel in the early morning hours.   JMO

From Paulus 6/23:

 To your question what I did on May 31st 2005, I can state
the following. Around 02.00 I was awakened by the barking of
my dogs and Valentijn who had awakened before I woke up.
I
heard a lot of noise, I got dressed and walked to the gate. There
I saw a police car and two police officers. There were also several
other cars, among them a van and I think about 10 people or so.
Most of these people turned out to be Americans but there were
also a few Arubans, among other Charles CROES and two people
with a cord around their necks. I think they were from a hotel.
A police officer asked me if he could talk to me and he told me
that a girl had gone missing and that my son had been seen with
this girl. The group as a whole seemed agitated . One of the
Americans told me that it was about a girl my son had met at
“Carlos & Charlies”. I told him immediately that it could not have
been my son because he had played in a “free tournament” at
the Holiday in during the afternoon and that I had picked him
up at 23.00 hours at “Mc Donalds”. I then went to Joran's
apartment and to my surprise and to my anger he was not in
his apartment. I then called him on his mobile phone. He immediately
answered his phone. I asked him where he was and the told me
he was at the “Wyndham”. That he was at the “Wyndham” did
not surprise me at that moment. He was supposed to be playing
in the “Free tournament” there.
That could also be a clue that I
indeed did not see him after I had dropped him off at the
“Raquet Club”. I told him that people wanted to talk to him
with regard to a girl that had gone missing and that I would
come to where he was. I then got into the police-car and the
whole group drove over to the “Wyndham”.
I walked towards
the casino that was locking up. I could not see Joran there and
I again called him on his mobile phone. He answered and told
me that he was at home now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 11:27:21 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Could this Hayley Sagona be the woman who posted that she and her husband or companion were drugged and brought to some remote location while in Aruba?  

As was mentioned, the only Hayley that comes up in search in NY was born 1968.


that incident happened in 96 or 98... so I doubt that would be the same person.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 11:28:21 AM
klaas - there was an MB student, girl, who stayed on Aruba for a week or two, and was joined by her parents? (May have been pre-planned?) Her whole family searched for Natalee ...

Do you recall her name? It was a bit unusual. I've been trying to find her in the FBI statements list.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 07, 2007, 11:30:21 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Could this Hayley Sagona be the woman who posted that she and her husband or companion were drugged and brought to some remote location while in Aruba?  

As was mentioned, the only Hayley that comes up in search in NY was born 1968.


that incident happened in 96 or 98... so I doubt that would be the same person.


OK...just trying to recall things that were posted...the time & specifics are now fuzzy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:31:14 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Date rape drugs are quickly metabolized in the body...traces in urine would only be found within a few hours after ingestion.   That is why it's such a good choice for said purpose.  Now, I am not sure about other drugs.  My question would be what is the comparison being made with should any be found?  Anyone get my drift?


I don't get your drift. What is it?


GHB or whatever it's called is quickly metabolized.  You would need more along the lines of tissue samples or maybe even stomach contents to find that stuff after a few days.   Maybe they were looking for a drug that lingers in the body longer, I am not certain.  The one thing that caught my attention is that this person must have indicated to someone that something strange happened to her also.  I am sure the test results would come back negative by this time.  They were just doing the test because she told them something that warranted the need for testing.  JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:34:47 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
klaas - there was an MB student, girl, who stayed on Aruba for a week or two, and was joined by her parents? (May have been pre-planned?) Her whole family searched for Natalee ...

Do you recall her name? It was a bit unusual. I've been trying to find her in the FBI statements list.


I believe that was Haley Unicaper?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:34:58 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Date rape drugs are quickly metabolized in the body...traces in urine would only be found within a few hours after ingestion.   That is why it's such a good choice for said purpose.  Now, I am not sure about other drugs.  My question would be what is the comparison being made with should any be found?  Anyone get my drift?


I don't get your drift. What is it?


GHB or whatever it's called is quickly metabolized.  You would need more along the lines of tissue samples or maybe even stomach contents to find that stuff after a few days.   Maybe they were looking for a drug that lingers in the body longer, I am not certain.  The one thing that caught my attention is that this person must have indicated to someone that something strange happened to her also.  I am sure the test results would come back negative by this time.  They were just doing the test because she told them something that warranted the need for testing.  JMO


I find it kind of strange, but there might be a simple answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:35:52 AM
msmarple - I just went to BFN and brought over the Birmingham meeting Q&A over here.  I know we had it, but couldn't find it.  It's now here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1124


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 11:38:25 AM
I did notice the FBI interview with Tracey Allen, and the composite drawing. Quite a few other interviews with folks in the US (other than Alabama).

Looks like at least 60 +/- interviews with MB students.

{ climbing out on a limb here } ... I think every minute of Natalee's time on that trip has been mapped in a spread sheet with corroborating names and documents.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 07, 2007, 11:39:29 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Rob"
<snip>
Klaas, I'm trying to tie something together here...do we know for a fact that the 'call(s)' do-es exist? I have heard a few conflicting things on this...

One call to classmate...William Morris????

One call to Beth...'I don't know these guys / people' ~ this call got Beth speeding and pulled over by the state trooper, who listened to the call, and escorted her to the state line... where she was joined by the state police of that state. Arkansas to Alabama????

Time approx 3 am.

Are either of these calls real?

If they are, it nails Paulus' ass to the wall.

If J2K (or J + Deepak and unknown person) are at the racquet club at 3 am per the gardener, then it looks like they are getting fake evidence to plant on the beach...

This puts Paulus totally alone in the house as he said he was there at that time...


Rob - Beth has said out loud, to a room full of people, that there were NO PHONE CALLS TO or FROM Natalee during the trip.

The William Morris call (the one C Croes listened to) was from a Florida area code. There was "no human vocalization" on it.

I know this phone call thing dies hard, but I really think she tried to put it to rest. It is one thing for sure the FBI could investigate.

One of the things she stresses in these talks to travelers she's doing, is to take your cell phone, get international calling, and keep the phone with you at all times.



Beth Twitty
'The Abrams
April 19, 2006


ABRAMS: Beth, any truth to this, I don't know if it's rumor or report, et cetera, that Natalee had said something to you about having a crush on a blonde haired, blue eyed boy in Aruba?

TWITTY: Dan, there's just—there's no truth to that at all. You know Natalee had not called me. She didn't have international calling on her phone and no she never—her friends said that this never happened, it was never mentioned. And just simply it's just another rumor that had started and it's just not true, Dan.


Birmingham Meeting
October 28, 2006


Question and Answers:

15. Did Natalee make any phone calls that night?

BETH: There was a strange call to a friend of hers (William) but there is no evidence that it was from Natalee. The message was on his Cell phone and he retreived it on the airplane on the way home.

Credit: Debbie - BFN


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 11:40:20 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Date rape drugs are quickly metabolized in the body...traces in urine would only be found within a few hours after ingestion.   That is why it's such a good choice for said purpose.  Now, I am not sure about other drugs.  My question would be what is the comparison being made with should any be found?  Anyone get my drift?


I don't get your drift. What is it?


GHB or whatever it's called is quickly metabolized.  You would need more along the lines of tissue samples or maybe even stomach contents to find that stuff after a few days.   Maybe they were looking for a drug that lingers in the body longer, I am not certain.  The one thing that caught my attention is that this person must have indicated to someone that something strange happened to her also.  I am sure the test results would come back negative by this time.  They were just doing the test because she told them something that warranted the need for testing.  JMO


How bout XTC? Wonder how long it hangs around in your system.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:45:18 AM
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:45:29 AM
If everyone was giving a urine sample it wouldn't stand out, but here we have this one person giving one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 07, 2007, 11:46:31 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
klaas - there was an MB student, girl, who stayed on Aruba for a week or two, and was joined by her parents? (May have been pre-planned?) Her whole family searched for Natalee ...

Do you recall her name? It was a bit unusual. I've been trying to find her in the FBI statements list.


I believe that was Haley Unicaper?


Yes.  Haley Uncapher.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 07, 2007, 11:48:10 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"


How bout XTC? Wonder how long it hangs around in your system.


According to this site, 2 days:

Amphetamine variants
 DOB, DOM, MDA, MDMA; Adam, Ecstasy, STP, XTC

 Up to 2 days

From: http://www.alwaystestclean.com/how_long.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:48:57 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Maybe she had just got back from Aruba and called a tip line to report that she was drugged at that bar on her last night there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 11:48:58 AM
The latest from Natalee's Freebirds:

Blood – Not Cleaning Fluid

The Perfection of the Misinformation Campaign


Is it any wonder the Holloway/Twitty families have been so frustrated since the beginning of this “investigation” by Aruba into their daughter’s disappearance?

On June 9, 2005 Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe, and Satish Kalpoe were arrested for pre-trial detention as suspects in Natalee’s disappearance.

On that same day, Aruban officials impounded Deepak Kalpoe’s car.

At approximately 8:30 that night, a search for blood was conducted inside that vehicle. That same day, FBI officials compiled a report of blood sample comparisons from their findings in that car.

One week later, DNA lab results came back from the FBI’s forensic laboratory in Quantico.

Pure logic tells us that if there was not blood found in the car –a comparison could not have been made.

Neither could a DNA report have been generated by the FBI.

From the Aruban case file log:


Search for blood in Deepak Kalpoe's car
June 9, 2005
3 page report
Divisie Centrale Recherche, Aruba

Laboratory Report (blood sample)
June 9, 2005
Blood Samples COMPARISON
FBI – Quantico



The "Diario," a local daily newspaper, is reporting that a human blood sample found in a car at the residence of one of the teens in custody — the 17-year-old son of a high-ranking island judicuary official — is now being sent to the U.S. and will be tested for a possible match to Natalee, whose mother gave a blood sample to investigators.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html


The next day, June 10, 2005, DNA samples were taken from Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway in Aruba.

June 10, 2005 brought us another important occurrence in this case – a confession was made by one of the suspects arrested the previous day.

Chief of Police, Gerold Dompig

CBS NEWS
June 10, 2005

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/10/national/main700829.shtml

Holloway's family rushed late Friday to an old stone lighthouse beside Arisha beach after Deputy Police Commissioner Gerold Dompig told The Associated Press that one of three young men in custody admitted that "something bad happened" to Holloway and was leading police to the scene of the alleged crime.

Paul Reynolds - Natalee Holloway's Uncle

'Scarborough Country'
July 12, 2005

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551822

PAUL REYNOLDS, UNCLE OF NATALEE HOLLOWAY: I know that my sister had a meeting with the FBI June 10, Friday. And from that meeting, she became convinced that Natalee was no longer alive. She called her mother and told her that. And our family was—was—began the grieving process.


However, if Aruban spokespeople were to be believed, there was not blood, but rather cleaning fluid found inside Deepak’s car – and the confession was merely a “misinformation campaign.”

FOX NEWS
June 11, 2005

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html

David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body.

However, Cruz later retracted the statement, saying he was a victim of a "misinformation campaign."


Jug Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
July 1, 2005
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485048/

TWITTY: If they let them walk on this island after what Beth and I know, there's a lot of information that we have that we cannot share, because it would jeopardize the investigation. But if they let them walk, we can share it. And it would be devastating. The United States, the world will be amazed.

Amazing indeed!



Natalee and her family deserve justice, and we will not let up until they have it!

Natalee's Freebirds


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 11:49:55 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
msmarple - I just went to BFN and brought over the Birmingham meeting Q&A over here.  I know we had it, but couldn't find it.  It's now here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1124


Thanks klaas. (Does not include some of the discussion, and secondary questions, that ensued. I know someone who took extensive notes; I'll check on that later.)

Thanks also for Haley's name; I'm sure that's it. I don't recall seeing her among the FBI statements - but it doesn't matter. It just happened that her family were previous visitors. I think she was not returning with the group, but rather going to be joined by her parents. Their vacation turned into a search ...  :cry:  .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 11:53:55 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Maybe she had just got back from Aruba and called a tip line to report that she was drugged at that bar on her last night there.


Isn't that what I just said?  I think I am confused now. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:56:10 AM
As Rob said earlier, we are all stuck with a lot of loose ends and no way of systematically including, or excluding peripheral information.  We need the complete set of files!  How long do the Kalpoes have before responding to the latest request for discovery?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 11:58:19 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Maybe she had just got back from Aruba and called a tip line to report that she was drugged at that bar on her last night there.


Isn't that what I just said?  I think I am confused now. LOL


Not sure! lol

I was thinking everyone thought she must have been at the bar the night Natalee disappeared.  I was thinking she could have been there on the 5th of June and called the cops as soon as she got back to America.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 07, 2007, 12:04:06 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Maybe she had just got back from Aruba and called a tip line to report that she was drugged at that bar on her last night there.


Isn't that what I just said?  I think I am confused now. LOL


Not sure! lol

I was thinking everyone thought she must have been at the bar the night Natalee disappeared.  I was thinking she could have been there on the 5th of June and called the cops as soon as she got back to America.



LOL!  We are on the same page.  I think it's my pencils, they need sharpening...be back in a bit.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 12:04:38 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Maybe she had just got back from Aruba and called a tip line to report that she was drugged at that bar on her last night there.


Isn't that what I just said?  I think I am confused now. LOL


Not sure! lol

I was thinking everyone thought she must have been at the bar the night Natalee disappeared.  I was thinking she could have been there on the 5th of June and called the cops as soon as she got back to America.


Or... perhaps she was there and for some unknown or insane reason happen to get one of the drinks Joran might have provided or Natalee -- and got sick or passed out herself...only to report it after going home....

howz that for speculation?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 12:07:13 PM
Quote from: "Silverfox"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what is more simple than a urine sample on a female?  The only two reasons would be to check for drugs or pregnancy.  Both would require follow up blood samples for verification.   What other reasons would there be?


Maybe she had just got back from Aruba and called a tip line to report that she was drugged at that bar on her last night there.


Isn't that what I just said?  I think I am confused now. LOL


Not sure! lol

I was thinking everyone thought she must have been at the bar the night Natalee disappeared.  I was thinking she could have been there on the 5th of June and called the cops as soon as she got back to America.


Or... perhaps she was there and for some unknown or insane reason happen to get one of the drinks Joran might have provided or Natalee -- and got sick or passed out herself...only to report it after going home....

howz that for speculation?


Wonder what size shoes she wears.....   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 12:07:24 PM
Silverfox: Check the avatar thread.  :wink:

I'm following you guys..............you make lurking worthwhile!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: shadow on May 07, 2007, 12:09:36 PM
I just can't seem to make a logical connection between this witness and Natalee. There's got to be something though or it would not be part of the case files. IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 12:09:53 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Off to work. . .

have a glorious day, Monkeys!

Anna


Anna.....you look very pretty today...lol. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 12:13:03 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Joran needs to sue the ghost writer, because so far this book is garbage!  It reads like a childish entry into a bad diary.  I like her, she like me, we don't like no more, next....  ARGH!


YEP......PLUS.....she did me and I did her and all her friends and I lied and said I did not...and we all DO each other......gross....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 12:19:51 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline5.jpg)




OK......one thing that bothers me about this video/casino/Paul thingy is that there were PLENTY of people around that table and witnesses......did anyone of THOSE peeps say it WAS HIM?? We do not need video to prove it....ASK the people who were at the damn table!! SIMPLE!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: shadow on May 07, 2007, 12:28:07 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Rob"
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline5.jpg)




OK......one thing that bothers me about this video/casino/Paul thingy is that there were PLENTY of people around that table and witnesses......did anyone of THOSE peeps say it WAS HIM?? We do not need video to prove it....ASK the people who were at the damn table!! SIMPLE!!!


Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:31 pm
Mary never heard the buoy toll
ask the men who play dice and “roll”

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:37 pm
The DiceMen must be questioned.
They to go to the Music and enter the same Maze
Mary who was not a virgin entered
The DiceMen ROLLED
Mary ROLLED


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 12:28:19 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Rob"
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline5.jpg)




OK......one thing that bothers me about this video/casino/Paul thingy is that there were PLENTY of people around that table and witnesses......did anyone of THOSE peeps say it WAS HIM?? We do not need video to prove it....ASK the people who were at the damn table!! SIMPLE!!!


That’s my thinking too, but the MB kids did not seem to be all that observant that night.  I remember in one of the statements a girl says Natalee never sat down at the blackjack table and stood next to someone.  Then we see the HI video and Natalee is obviously sitting at the table.  I just doubt any of them gave the older guy a second look.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 12:29:36 PM
I'd like to post I agree with Anna's assessment of the importance of the shoes and I hope the argument over sizing can stop for I guess it's often misinterpreted whatever I post, but essentially without the shoe or a tracing of his foot (ALE might shoulda coulda woulda done that).........we can't know.

Easy I like your shoe jokies  :lol:

I have to admit I was told something different by Beth's side regarding William's phone call and the message originally, did Beth actually participate in the final Q&A that BFN posted?  :? Just asking ... but NOT to muddy the waters or to generate new angst or debate.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 07, 2007, 12:31:12 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
That’s my thinking too, but the MB kids did not seem to be all that observant that night.  I remember in one of the statements a girl says Natalee never sat down at the blackjack table and stood next to someone.  Then we see the HI video and Natalee is obviously sitting at the table.  I just doubt any of them gave the older guy a second look.


If I were a teenage girl having fun on my island vacation, there is no way I'd notice an unattractive middle-aged man. I'd be concentrating on any cute young guys in the area, so I can see why they wouldn't remember Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 12:32:58 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
<snip>
I have to admit I was told something different by Beth's side regarding William's phone call and the message originally, did Beth actually participate in the final Q&A that BFN posted?  :? Just asking ... but NOT to muddy the waters or to generate new angst or debate.


None - Yes, Beth & Dave.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 12:33:49 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
<snip>
I have to admit I was told something different by Beth's side regarding William's phone call and the message originally, did Beth actually participate in the final Q&A that BFN posted?  :? Just asking ... but NOT to muddy the waters or to generate new angst or debate.


None - Yes, Beth & Dave.


I would not be commenting about phone calls otherwise.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 12:35:01 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I'd like to post I agree with Anna's assessment of the importance of the shoes and I hope the argument over sizing can stop for I guess it's often misinterpreted whatever I post, but essentially without the shoe or a tracing of his foot (ALE might shoulda coulda woulda done that).........we can't know.

Easy I like your shoe jokies  :lol:

I have to admit I was told something different by Beth's side regarding William's phone call and the message originally, did Beth actually participate in the final Q&A that BFN posted?  :? Just asking ... but NOT to muddy the waters or to generate new angst or debate.


Good questions nonesy! How are you? I love to see your cheerful self here! Hope your Monday is going well!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 12:35:54 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
That’s my thinking too, but the MB kids did not seem to be all that observant that night.  I remember in one of the statements a girl says Natalee never sat down at the blackjack table and stood next to someone.  Then we see the HI video and Natalee is obviously sitting at the table.  I just doubt any of them gave the older guy a second look.


If I were a teenage girl having fun on my island vacation, there is no way I'd notice an unattractive middle-aged man. I'd be concentrating on any cute young guys in the area, so I can see why they wouldn't remember Paulus.


Yep, these were just kids being kids on vacation.  They were more interested in each other and other kids in the same age bracket.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 12:41:57 PM
Hi CBB, I'm doing good sweet one and how are you? You've dressed everyone so well, I need to change to my new clothes too, I plan to get that done!

msmarples I just feel a need to dispel the confusion in my own mind - it wasn't directed as a slight to anyone, I'm going to email SB to ask, he was there for the meeting and I had heard from someone else there that Beth wasn't able to stay as long. I feel sure SB was listening and taking notes too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 12:43:51 PM
oh and I just had a delicious piece of leftover white pizza I don't need for lunch, but no cookie - not yet  :lol: the day is still early


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 12:45:20 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi CBB, I'm doing good sweet one and how are you? You've dressed everyone so well, I need to change to my new clothes too, I plan to get that done!

msmarples I just feel a need to dispel the confusion in my own mind - it wasn't directed as a slight to anyone, I'm going to email SB to ask, he was there for the meeting and I had heard from someone else there that Beth wasn't able to stay as long. I feel sure SB was listening and taking notes too.


None - None taken at all. (offense.)

Beth was not there for the daytime portion of the meeting. She was there for the Q&A, which was in the evening. Quite a few family members were there, especially during the evening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 12:51:52 PM
msmarple were you able to go? I am going back thru emails I have now but I actually think the information I was given was afforded by phone? So much about this case is confusing but I also often wonder because to safeguard certain evidentiary pieces that much has to remain confidential? I dunno, it's Monday, maybe that's irking me  :lol:


Title: new clothes (avatar)
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 12:51:58 PM
The new clothes (avatar) looks nice... but can't see to get it to show at least on the profile page.... i tried each of the options including linking from my own website....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 12:52:59 PM
oh but aha ---- it shows here.... cool....

Thanks a lot....

i got change my smoking habits though -- this one seems hazardous to my health... heh heh


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 12:57:30 PM
Quote from: "Silverfox"
oh but aha ---- it shows here.... cool....

Thanks a lot....

i got change my smoking habits though -- this one seems hazardous to my health... heh heh


Uh-huh. It's the fourth of july's version of smoking crack!  :lol:

Get it? fireCRACKer?  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Just for the record,l I was out of coffee this morning.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 12:58:48 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 01:01:09 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Rob"
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/PaulusHairline5.jpg)




OK......one thing that bothers me about this video/casino/Paul thingy is that there were PLENTY of people around that table and witnesses......did anyone of THOSE peeps say it WAS HIM?? We do not need video to prove it....ASK the people who were at the damn table!! SIMPLE!!!



OK.......I guess what I am trying to say is...... (AND PLEASE DO NOT GET THE WRONG IDEA OF what I am trying to get at).......some Mt. brook teens were also at the table...ASK THEM IF IT WAS PAUL (paulus)........has anyone ever asked them if it was HIM!!>??.....surely by now they have see his pix enough to know whether or not it was PAUL at the damn table......should not be too hard to prove....plenty of witnesses...not like it was a one on one meet....does anyone get my point>??????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 01:02:52 PM
the point I am trying to get at isn't ROCKET SCIENCE!! LOL........just ask peeps at the table that night. THERE were MANY peeps there!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 01:04:26 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
msmarple were you able to go? I am going back thru emails I have now but I actually think the information I was given was afforded by phone? So much about this case is confusing but I also often wonder because to safeguard certain evidentiary pieces that much has to remain confidential? I dunno, it's Monday, maybe that's irking me  :lol:


Of course the evidentiary concern is a valid point. However, I *think* Beth might have just said "We can't comment about that" or something similar, rather than elaborating on her career, human vocalization, etc. (I mentioned that in a previous post.)

Art Wood chimed in on this, too. There were "squaking" or "screeching" sounds, and wind or maybe ocean roar, BUT NO WORDS ("human vocalization"). And I think Art is the one who said it was from a Florida area code.

And I know perfectly well that I - msmarple - specifically asked about "Who are these people?" and "Are you calling home?"  Never happened in any phone call that Beth, Dave, or Art Wood know about.

That's what they said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:05:09 PM
Nut, I get it. You are right and I've had the thought as well. I will say that I'm not certain anyone would remember even if it was Paulus. Nat seemed to have a casual conversation with the man, but we can't ask her, and it was quite a while before anyone caught the older man in the video. I'm just not sure they could reliably remember if it was Paulus.

Does that make sense?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:08:26 PM
I've always the entrance and exit videos of that man at the table. They exist for Natalee and Joran, and they exist for that man. We could get a better look and be able to prove it one way or the other at that point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 07, 2007, 01:08:39 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Nut, I get it. You are right and I've had the thought as well. I will say that I'm not certain anyone would remember even if it was Paulus. Nat seemed to have a casual conversation with the man, but we can't ask her, and it was quite a while before anyone caught the older man in the video. I'm just not sure they could reliably remember if it was Paulus.

Does that make sense?


That's kind of what I was trying to say, CBB. When they're in a crowd, people tend to ignore most of the people around them. And when you're gambling, you tend to concentrate on that, not the other people. Unless there was something to make an individual stand out in the crowd, most people (especially teens) would not recall enough about a nondescript middle-aged man to know if he was who they saw that night or not, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 01:10:02 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Nut, I get it. You are right and I've had the thought as well. I will say that I'm not certain anyone would remember even if it was Paulus. Nat seemed to have a casual conversation with the man, but we can't ask her, and it was quite a while before anyone caught the older man in the video. I'm just not sure they could reliably remember if it was Paulus.

Does that make sense?


That's kind of what I was trying to say, CBB. When they're in a crowd, people tend to ignore most of the people around them. And when you're gambling, you tend to concentrate on that, not the other people. Unless there was something to make an individual stand out in the crowd, most people (especially teens) would not recall enough about a nondescript middle-aged man to know if he was who they saw that night or not, IMO.


there was no need to notice a sweaty PIG sitting at the table with you
unless they commented on how GROSS he was  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:10:19 PM
Jossy has said that contrary to Joran's interview statement that Paulus was at the casino for the first time, Paulus often was at the casino. The lie alone tells me it was Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 01:11:05 PM
:? another thing that has always bugged me about Joran's shoe size....anyone on the investigating peeps ever check his closet or rom to see what size his shoes are??.......why all the hype about the shoe size IF POLICE CHECKED HIS GOD DAMN CLOSET!! HELLOOOOoooooooooooooo.......Damn...sorry...I am almost at heart attack level here cause I am not even an investigator and I as a 'laymen...would check this shit....no?? DID ANYONE??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 01:12:24 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
:? another thing that has always bugged me about Joran's shoe size....anyone on the investigating peeps ever check his closet or rom to see what size his shoes are??.......why all the hype about the shoe size IF POLICE CHECKED HIS GOD DAMN CLOSET!! HELLOOOOoooooooooooooo.......Damn...sorry...I am almost at heart attack level here cause I am not even an investigator and I as a 'laymen...would check this shit....no?? DID ANYONE??


yes, see
that is the probelm, you nailed it

they NEVER followed up on anything

too many crack pipes in the ALE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 07, 2007, 01:14:32 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Nut, I get it. You are right and I've had the thought as well. I will say that I'm not certain anyone would remember even if it was Paulus. Nat seemed to have a casual conversation with the man, but we can't ask her, and it was quite a while before anyone caught the older man in the video. I'm just not sure they could reliably remember if it was Paulus.

Does that make sense?


I've seen a lot of sweaty, balding, middle aged men in bars.  Never was inclined to pay attention to them or who they may have resembled.  If I were 18 or 19, I would probably be looking right past them.  Not to mention that when on vacation, I seldom take notes on old sweaty men in bars.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 07, 2007, 01:15:29 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
:? another thing that has always bugged me about Joran's shoe size....anyone on the investigating peeps ever check his closet or rom to see what size his shoes are??.......why all the hype about the shoe size IF POLICE CHECKED HIS GOD DAMN CLOSET!! HELLOOOOoooooooooooooo.......Damn...sorry...I am almost at heart attack level here cause I am not even an investigator and I as a 'laymen...would check this shit....no?? DID ANYONE??


I hear ya.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:16:59 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
:? another thing that has always bugged me about Joran's shoe size....anyone on the investigating peeps ever check his closet or rom to see what size his shoes are??.......why all the hype about the shoe size IF POLICE CHECKED HIS GOD DAMN CLOSET!! HELLOOOOoooooooooooooo.......Damn...sorry...I am almost at heart attack level here cause I am not even an investigator and I as a 'laymen...would check this shit....no?? DID ANYONE??


Yep. The fact that Joran has made SUCH an effort to confuse his shoe's whereabouts and the size he wears tells us that the shoes are a problem for him and an interest to anyone investigating this case. At this point, I don't think it really matters what size he wears. Depending on which statement you look at, it comes up a lie because the size is all over the place.

That's ONE of a whole litany of issues that JK2 should all be sitting in seperate cells to contemplate, until they can explain the inconsistancies.

But  FIRST, they have to be confronted with them!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 01:18:17 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Silverfox"
oh but aha ---- it shows here.... cool....

Thanks a lot....

i got change my smoking habits though -- this one seems hazardous to my health... heh heh


Uh-huh. It's the fourth of july's version of smoking crack!  :lol:

Get it? fireCRACKer?  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Just for the record,l I was out of coffee this morning.  :roll:


LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 07, 2007, 01:19:18 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"


OK......one thing that bothers me about this video/casino/Paul thingy is that there were PLENTY of people around that table and witnesses......did anyone of THOSE peeps say it WAS HIM?? We do not need video to prove it....ASK the people who were at the damn table!! SIMPLE!!!



Remember ... according to Joran and Paulus' declarations Paulus left during the poker tournament ... this was prior to Joran's encounter with Natalee and friends at the black jack table.  Neverthess ... Beth's words of September, 2005 imply that she knew there was a Natalee/Paulus connection on the evening of May 29, 2005.  Think about it ... the casino recording that appears to show Paulus conversing with Natalee was not released/leaked by ABC until March, 2006.

Janet

__________________________

1.  How did Beth Twitty know that Natalee had met Paulus Van der Sloot?

Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
September 20, 2005


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: Well, there was a phone call made. And it was just really having me refer to—you know, I‘d only mentioned the fact I had gotten from prosecuting attorney as far as the open line of credit, and that Joran is in his casino gambling, and I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.

_____________________

2.  Could Natalee's friends who were at the black jack table have revealed this info to Beth?


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement
July 12, 2005


After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)

____________________

3.  Could there be declarations from employees or patrons which reveal that there was a Paulus/Natalee connection?

Jossy Mansur
Dana Pretzer Show
Dec. 14, 2006


DANA: When you look at this case, a question keeps coming up. I am looking at the picture on my PC. It is the alleged picture of a person in the casino with Natalee that looks a lot like Paul. Has there been any update on this issue?

JOSSY: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:21:51 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
:? another thing that has always bugged me about Joran's shoe size....anyone on the investigating peeps ever check his closet or rom to see what size his shoes are??.......why all the hype about the shoe size IF POLICE CHECKED HIS GOD DAMN CLOSET!! HELLOOOOoooooooooooooo.......Damn...sorry...I am almost at heart attack level here cause I am not even an investigator and I as a 'laymen...would check this shit....no?? DID ANYONE??


Yeah and there are countless other ways too, nut! I'd be satisfied if they did a simple credit card check for his parents. Check the payments to any shoe related purchase for the last 4 years and guess what? The size is right there! Remember the OJ trial? They found a purchase of bruno magli (sp) shoes that matched the footprints at the crime scene in OJ's size purchased at Bloomingdale's on the exact month, day, and year. It even gave the color!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Silverfox on May 07, 2007, 01:28:34 PM
It is not a coincidence that Paulus was at the same table, in fact right next to Natalee.  Joran is on the other side of the girls.  Natalee shows lots of space between her and Paulus and even appears to me, repulsed by him.  She is sitting so close to the girl on her right that she is almost on her lap.... If I were there looking for a spot on a table I would probably grab that spot because there was room....

All along we thought this was a cover up for Joran --- but really it was a cover up for the father -- "your own father?  Unbelievable"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 01:31:29 PM
CBB - Here is something else I actually know a little about (and probably many others too).

For practically every retail purchase, there is a SKU - store/shop keeper's unit #. It's a bunch of numbers, but basically reveals manufacturer, distirbutor, item, size, color ...

It doesn't even have to be a credit card purchase. It's bar coded, and either scanned or keyed into the cash register.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 07, 2007, 01:34:10 PM
CBB you are so right about the receipts for the shoes  :shock:

silverfox, as sick as it makes me to think of it, I agree with you that PVDS was there that night and sitting there for a reason  :?

Klaas, FYI new royal hat alert at the white house, black with lovely large white flower.........a new creation?
 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:36:44 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
CBB - Here is something else I actually know a little about (and probably many others too).

For practically every retail purchase, there is a SKU - store/shop keeper's unit #. It's a bunch of numbers, but basically reveals manufacturer, distirbutor, item, size, color ...

It doesn't even have to be a credit card purchase. It's bar coded, and either scanned or keyed into the cash register.


Well, there you go! Exactly!

It's like the question of him being in school  the following day. That's a question that should be, could be, even now nailed down shut. There just hasn't been a willingness to nail this stuff down.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 07, 2007, 01:37:00 PM
... no one had to interview the people at the table....the
multiple cameras took pictures of everyone...and from various positions...
the casino can tell you who played and how much each bet and who dealt and who the relief dealers were for that table....we have always talked about only one dealer....dealers are relieved on a regular rotation....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 01:39:48 PM
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:41:01 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
... no one had to interview the people at the table....the
multiple cameras took pictures of everyone...and from various positions...
the casino can tell you who played and how much each bet and who dealt and who the relief dealers were for that table....we have always talked about only one dealer....dealers are relieved on a regular rotation....


And mere, anytime you can establish something WITHOUT it being established from the mouths of suspects, it sticks. It's also invaluable to have lies on record that evidence contradicts. That;s the sort of stuff that makes it possible to convict without a body. It's cumulative, but it adds up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 01:41:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


:lol: :lol:  - yes, I think we're just trying to count the ways!  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:42:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


CLARITY! Klaas has defined clarity and has smacked that nail right on the head!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:45:20 PM
The question in my mind is: Is Holland falling in suit with ALE, or is there an investigation going on for real?

IMO, we'll know shortly because if there is an investigation, all 3 will be in cells soon, very soon, based solely on their own words.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 07, 2007, 01:46:50 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


CLARITY! Klaas has defined clarity and has smacked that nail right on the head!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Funny/thwerk21.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:48:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


CLARITY! Klaas has defined clarity and has smacked that nail right on the head!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Funny/thwerk21.gif)


That's great, Anna! PERFECT!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 07, 2007, 01:49:14 PM
O/T  4 x 4

Thanks for the compliment on my avatar.  Yellow seems to be her color!  Hope you are seeing the Queen's hats!  I encourage you to wear one to your son's wedding.  I have sources reasonable ones that I can relay via Klaas if she will be so kind as to pass them on to you if you are interested.

 :D

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Easywriter on May 07, 2007, 01:51:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


Yep, they would have to know all these things that have been bugging us for two years, because it is some pretty basic stuff.  Casino records, phone records, ATM records….. It’s all there.  We just don’t know what it says and we can’t believe any of the suspects.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Rob on May 07, 2007, 01:52:58 PM
Carnut- I think the MB kids have been asked to please not comment on anything until further notice. That is the reason you do not hear from any of them anymore.

FEB made a statement that seemed as if Natalee was seen back at the HI. Since that time, I do not recall seeing any of them anywhere online. Other than maybe Dash once or twice.

FEB's statement has been internet fodder for almost two years and lends credence to the trolls trying to side track Justice For Natalee. This is a likely reason that they have been asked to remain silent. Even though her statement is not exculpatory of the main suspects, it adds fuel to the fire and things get taken out of context, as we all know.

I believe that the FBI, ALE and Aruban Authorities all know what happened just like Klaas said. In the future hopefully the rest of us will all know too...

If nothing else, I just hope Beth and Dave get the answers. If they're satisfied, I'm satisfied.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Anna on May 07, 2007, 01:54:09 PM
To find out something, ALE would have to want to know.  From the few statements we have seen, it is obvious they never follow up with logical questions so I have to assume they don't really want to know.  At least in the beginning, they surely didn't.

And the times given on the PV's are ridiculous.  Hours of questions and a page or two, double spaced, very little to show for the time allotted.

To find something, you have to be looking for it!


Back to working and lurking.  I hope I don't incur

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Funny/thththdeathbychores.jpg)

 :D

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 01:57:01 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
ALE KNOWS

1.  Who was at the table and if it was PVDS
2.  What size shoe Joran really wears

IMO, ALE knows what happened to Natalee and has since at least June 10, 2005.

ALE and ARUBA have chosen to cover it up


Yep, they would have to know all these things that have been bugging us for two years, because it is some pretty basic stuff.  Casino records, phone records, ATM records….. It’s all there.  We just don’t know what it says and we can’t believe any of the suspects.


The absolutely unimaginable thing is that Beth and`Dave`don't know what it says either, and that's unforgivable.

For me, the stuff left hanging is the valid`reason for a boycott, and`we'd accomplish something if we could correctly convey that to Aruba.
I'm sorry to admit that bad things happen in the US too, even to visitors. What makes Aruba so dangerous is the lack of commitment to resolve it and hold the responsible accountable. The fact that ALE is capable of working hard to cover up the facts is frightening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 02:00:12 PM
bad stuff happens in the USA and yet i still love it with all my heart  8)

hard to imagine this type of BS would happen here....

certainly there are corrupt people and bad cops and everything else
but this crap in ARUBA is tooooooooooo  much  

it is RIGHT in their FACE  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 07, 2007, 02:06:33 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
O/T  4 x 4

Thanks for the compliment on my avatar.  Yellow seems to be her color!  Hope you are seeing the Queen's hats!  I encourage you to wear one to your son's wedding.  I have sources reasonable ones that I can relay via Klaas if she will be so kind as to pass them on to you if you are interested.

 :D

.


O/T  
TY no hat going on here...I do not do hats.....lool...I have big hair. I am stuck in the late 70's 80's, hehe......my hair is and has always been black...of course no gray roots will be on hand, lol.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 02:07:51 PM
Quote from: "robots"
bad stuff happens in the USA and yet i still love it with all my heart  8)

hard to imagine this type of BS would happen here....

certainly there are corrupt people and bad cops and everything else
but this crap in ARUBA is tooooooooooo  much  

it is RIGHT in their FACE  :x


Oh yeah, Robots! I've said it before, but would again remind everyone that we may not be able to claim there is no corruption in the US, but I'll shout from the hilltops that no one feels secure being corupt in America.
We took down the President for heaven's sake, when he was perceived as being tainted with corruption. There are values we hold more dear than any individual. That's who we are and our free press is constantly shining a light on the rats. We collectively have ethics and principles and we hold those in law enforcement, and government for upholding those standards!

Aruba could learn a lot for their own benefit from us!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 07, 2007, 02:11:14 PM
Lord, I'm giving again my blanket apology for the typos!  :oops:
I'm not sure why but it's so hard for me to type with ANY accuracy on a laptop!  :oops:  SOWWY!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 07, 2007, 02:12:55 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
... no one had to interview the people at the table....the
multiple cameras took pictures of everyone...and from various positions...
the casino can tell you who played and how much each bet and who dealt and who the relief dealers were for that table....we have always talked about only one dealer....dealers are relieved on a regular rotation....


Logic dictates that Joran and Paulus would never have made the following declarations if they had not been assured that the May 29, 2005 recordings from casino security cameras would never be revealed.  I contend that the leaked segment appearing to show Natalee and Paulus conversing is all that the world will ever see regarding Paulus' movements at the casino on the evening prior Natalee Holloway's disappearance.

Janet


Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father.

... When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends.


Paulus Van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time. Joran, with my permission, took over my seat because he had been eliminated earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 07, 2007, 02:26:24 PM
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 07, 2007, 02:26:53 PM
Tamikosmom...I understand what you are saying....I guess it depends
on who leaked it and if any of the film is still available....lots of money
seems to have changed hands....so many loose ends to pay for...JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Mere on May 07, 2007, 02:35:30 PM
tamikosmom....thanks....forgot about the Posner statement.... :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 07, 2007, 02:37:46 PM
(http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/3830/casinocomparisonslp8.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 02:42:24 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 07, 2007, 02:42:38 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Carnut- I think the MB kids have been asked to please not comment on anything until further notice. That is the reason you do not hear from any of them anymore.

FEB made a statement that seemed as if Natalee was seen back at the HI. Since that time, I do not recall seeing any of them anywhere online. Other than maybe Dash once or twice.

FEB's statement has been internet fodder for almost two years and lends credence to the trolls trying to side track Justice For Natalee. This is a likely reason that they have been asked to remain silent. Even though her statement is not exculpatory of the main suspects, it adds fuel to the fire and things get taken out of context, as we all know.

I believe that the FBI, ALE and Aruban Authorities all know what happened just like Klaas said. In the future hopefully the rest of us will all know too...

If nothing else, I just hope Beth and Dave get the answers. If they're satisfied, I'm satisfied.


Yes - they know.  The Problem is NOW PROVING IT.  Evidence has in all likelyhood been destroyed or tainted.  They do indeed have the statements, but I also question if they have those that we are missing.

IMO, the Dutch investigators know there is a case, they know what happened, they just need something physical to match up to what they have.  The question is....Do they have enough now to bring this case to court?

Did they find anything at the VDS's?  We may know soon.  It was said the Dutch Investigators did remove items...Maybe a few pairs of shoes was in those boxes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 02:55:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Another question is..Why did Posner hire his own Private Investigators when he was not even on the island when NH dissapeared?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 07, 2007, 03:00:25 PM
PHONE CALL

NaNaRosebud
On Scaredmonkeys today, one of Natalee's classmates (Country Moon) said that the "call" Beth listened to over and over and with C. Croes had strange background sounds on it. Then when she got to the VDS house, she heard the same sound. When Beth arrived at the VDS house that first night, there was the same sound. It was the next door neighbor's monkey that had been left outside while they were on vacation and was mad, hot, thirsty and screeching.

She said that greta and crew kind of adopted the monkey and took care of it while there. (I read on Greta's blog that she was feeding the monkey.) But that's why Beth thinks Natalee was at the VDS house.......the distinct sound of a screeching monkey.
http://websleuths.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-26041

________________________________________________________________________
Beth was on Abrams and talked more about "the phone call".

Beth said a phone call came to Mississippi around midnight May 30 (1am Aruba time)
and said tht Natalee had been kidnapped by three people and they were named.

SHe didn't say who made the call or the names of the three kidnappers.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/6331
______________________________________________________________________________

A poster at courttv who heard the interview says that Beth said that the phone call that was placed at midnight on the night N disappeared was made to Mississippi (so to Beth's dad?), the phone caller named 3 names, said that N had been kidnapped.

It's not been stated by Beth that Natalee herself placed the call, at least from what I can gather.

That was why the FBI was called in right away, though, because of this call that said she was kidnapped.

Lots of discussion, some of it confusing, at

http://boards.courttv.com/showthread.php?s=d7c1aee1261a445b2a015c55f02806a4&threadid=230697
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/1436558/posts?page=1253#1253

________________________________________________________________
A Twitty family friend tells me that “I don’t know these people” was the code Beth had with her kids just in case.
_____________________________________________________________

C. CROES: Well, I have a sail rental company. And there was apparently a phone call made. And he was calling me betting or hoping that the phone call was made from one of our phones, and so that's why he called me.
________________________________________________________________
PHONE CALL:

“I got this from a Mountain Brook classmate posting on another board we're not supposed to link to on CTV, the call was around 2.am. and to a male student with the group. It was a female voice and sounded strained. The only message was something like "I don't even know these guys.." and it cut off.”

Many of the students who heard the call thought it sounded like Natalee, and one of them wrote that Natalee's mom thought it was Natalee, too.

The cell phone number associated with the phone was from Charles Croes' business, and that's why he was contacted
 for information.
http://rjames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49&page=6&pp=10

_________________________________________________________
3:15AM in the morning was placed to Jug Twitty's phone and the girl's voice said "Help me" - there was background noise - that was rumored to be the reason that Beth Holloway wanted to visit the Van Der Sloot home
I got this from a Mountain Brook classmate posting on another board we're not supposed to link to on CTV, the call was around 2.am. and to a male student with the group. It was a female voice and sounded strained. The only message was something like "I don't even know these guys.." and it cut off

Many of the students who heard the call thought it sounded like Natalee, and one of them wrote that Natalee's mom thought it was Natalee, too.

The cell phone number associated with the phone was from Charles Croes' business, and that's why he was contacted for information.
http://rjames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49&page=6&pp=10

_________________________________________________________________

Is there any truth to the article in The National Enquirer about Natalee calling a friend on her cell phone that last night?

ANSWER: Here is what I know about a phone call: Apparently a friend of Natalee's received a call to his voice mail/answering machine. There was background noise and then someone said something like, "Are you calling home?" As far as I know the phones were then disconnected and nothing else was recorded. I do not know if that call was from Natalee or from her cell phone or one she may have used. Incidentally, not all USA cell phone service works in Aruba. My AT&T cell phone works there, but my Verizon cell phone does not. And yes — I know — what kind of person has two cell phones? It is a bit nutty but I have two cell phones with different service. Why? For the very reason that some times I am in areas where service is limited. One other thing about the phone call — it is not clear when it was received by the person receiving the message.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162501,00.html
_______________________________________________
The part where he tells her about listening to the call 4 times and then talking with a person in the states is
edited out ! Here is link to video -
http://tinyurl.com/nlejc


__________________________________________________

PAULUS MEETS NATALEE

Beth Twitty

September 20, 2005

HOLLOWAY TWITTY: Well, there was a phone call made. And it was just really having me refer to—you know, I‘d only mentioned the fact I had gotten from prosecuting attorney as far as the open line of credit, and that Joran is in his casino gambling, and I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9407728/
_______________________________________________


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:05:26 PM
Hi everyone and good afternoon!

Nut: I said it before, I'll say it again. Take it for what it's worth.  I saw with MY OWN TWO EYES on the video that FOX and MSNBC showed...
Paulus standing up on the right side of the poll facing the dealer, smiling and talking with him. Then the video/tape/clip breaks and goes back to them all sitting at the table. You could clearly see it IS PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT. Nuff said! <grumbles>

Paulus went to Florida. And according to his comment about why he would leave Aruba while his son was in jail was that he went to Florida to withdraw Joran from College. I know I know, doesn't make sense, but does anything the Sloots do or say make sense?  Speculation: Most feel Paulus went to Florida to retrieve a snuff film or pictures taken of Natalee from the night in question. But, that was the reason Paulus gave for going to Florida, to withdraw Joran from college.

IIRC about who was home the night in question...It was Anita who claimed, in an interview, she, Val and Sabastian were in NL the night of May 29th. And unlike everything else that disappears, her statement has disappeared too. But I remember her stating this. It was big talk over on BFN when I posted there back in August 2005.

Natalee phone calls: Beth had made a statement to Greta as they were leaving the Sloots house. "I got what I came here for", meaning she had known Natalee had been there because of the monkey screaming. It was the same sound in the back ground noise in the phone call. Beth was clear on that. Why she is retracting that statement as if she never said it I don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:08:15 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Another question is..Why did Posner hire his own Private Investigators when he was not even on the island when NH dissapeared?


To help with the inside cover up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: AnnieMW1 on May 07, 2007, 03:09:33 PM
Forgive me for this question...but has anything HAPPENED since the Dutch team left the VDS house?  I've been away from the computer all week.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Another question is..Why did Posner hire his own Private Investigators when he was not even on the island when NH dissapeared?


To help with the inside cover up?


Posner also helping the Kalpoes with  Lawyer's out of Chicago?Or was that just refferal?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:12:32 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
Forgive me for this question...but has anything HAPPENED since the Dutch team left the VDS house?  I've been away from the computer all week.   :roll:

Nope - all has been silent from the Dutch team.  Nobody has any idea what they are doing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Spock on May 07, 2007, 03:13:05 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
Forgive me for this question...but has anything HAPPENED since the Dutch team left the VDS house?  I've been away from the computer all week.   :roll:

It is rumored they bought a case of suntan lotion and have an open tab at C&C...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:13:07 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
Forgive me for this question...but has anything HAPPENED since the Dutch team left the VDS house?  I've been away from the computer all week.   :roll:


Nada


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:15:51 PM
Just a Observation..Picture of the Protest Vs Beth and a picture of Joran when he was released. Who's kids are these?

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/24172305_ec2ac37967.jpg)

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/158068924_131bcb5cce_m.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:16:47 PM
Kids are probably Joran's  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: adoronron on May 07, 2007, 03:16:48 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Hi everyone and good afternoon!

Nut: I said it before, I'll say it again. Take it for what it's worth.  I saw with MY OWN TWO EYES on the video that FOX and MSNBC showed...
Paulus standing up on the right side of the poll facing the dealer, smiling and talking with him. Then the video/tape/clip breaks and goes back to them all sitting at the table. You could clearly see it IS PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT. Nuff said! <grumbles>

Paulus went to Florida. And according to his comment about why he would leave Aruba while his son was in jail was that he went to Florida to withdraw Joran from College. I know I know, doesn't make sense, but does anything the Sloots do or say make sense?  Speculation: Most feel Paulus went to Florida to retrieve a snuff film or pictures taken of Natalee from the night in question. But, that was the reason Paulus gave for going to Florida, to withdraw Joran from college.

IIRC about who was home the night in question...It was Anita who claimed, in an interview, she, Val and Sabastian were in NL the night of May 29th. And unlike everything else that disappears, her statement has disappeared too. But I remember her stating this. It was big talk over on BFN when I posted there back in August 2005.

Natalee phone calls: Beth had made a statement to Greta as they were leaving the Sloots house. "I got what I came here for", meaning she had known Natalee had been there because of the monkey screaming. It was the same sound in the back ground noise in the phone call. Beth was clear on that. Why she is retracting that statement as if she never said it I don't know.


Dkpen

You've answered a question I asked earlier today."Did paulas go to Florida the spring/summer of 2005?"
Do you know the dates he was there and what city he was in?

Ado.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:18:44 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Another question is..Why did Posner hire his own Private Investigators when he was not even on the island when NH dissapeared?


To help with the inside cover up?


Posner also helping the Kalpoes with  Lawyer's out of Chicago?Or was that just refferal?


First I've heard of this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:20:57 PM
I think it's important to specifiy when you make a statement that you make sure we know if it's a strong opinion or fact based upon research.

Sometimes we, me included, state things as if they are fact when they are actually opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:21:58 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Hi everyone and good afternoon!

Nut: I said it before, I'll say it again. Take it for what it's worth.  I saw with MY OWN TWO EYES on the video that FOX and MSNBC showed...
Paulus standing up on the right side of the poll facing the dealer, smiling and talking with him. Then the video/tape/clip breaks and goes back to them all sitting at the table. You could clearly see it IS PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT. Nuff said! <grumbles>

Paulus went to Florida. And according to his comment about why he would leave Aruba while his son was in jail was that he went to Florida to withdraw Joran from College. I know I know, doesn't make sense, but does anything the Sloots do or say make sense?  Speculation: Most feel Paulus went to Florida to retrieve a snuff film or pictures taken of Natalee from the night in question. But, that was the reason Paulus gave for going to Florida, to withdraw Joran from college.

IIRC about who was home the night in question...It was Anita who claimed, in an interview, she, Val and Sabastian were in NL the night of May 29th. And unlike everything else that disappears, her statement has disappeared too. But I remember her stating this. It was big talk over on BFN when I posted there back in August 2005.

Natalee phone calls: Beth had made a statement to Greta as they were leaving the Sloots house. "I got what I came here for", meaning she had known Natalee had been there because of the monkey screaming. It was the same sound in the back ground noise in the phone call. Beth was clear on that. Why she is retracting that statement as if she never said it I don't know.


Dkpen

You've answered a question I asked earlier today."Did paulas go to Florida the spring/summer of 2005?"
Do you know the dates he was there and what city he was in?

Ado.


Supposedly the city where Joran was to go to college. Date...hmmm...I want to say within the first few weeks Joran was in jail. Wasn't long after Joran was arrested because college was to start soon after. IIRC. Sorry I can't help more. I don't remember the name of the College. It's in South Florida, that much I do know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 07, 2007, 03:22:19 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Hi everyone and good afternoon!
Natalee phone calls: Beth had made a statement to Greta as they were leaving the Sloots house. "I got what I came here for", meaning she had known Natalee had been there because of the monkey screaming. It was the same sound in the back ground noise in the phone call. Beth was clear on that. Why she is retracting that statement as if she never said it I don't know.


There IS a good reason why the phone call is being somewhat retracted.
Hopefully, this will come out in the trial.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:24:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I think it's important to specifiy when you make a statement that you make sure we know if it's a strong opinion or fact based upon research.

Sometimes we, me included, state things as if they are fact when they are actually opinion.


What I am saying are facts. I can't help if suspects or those involved statements disappear. But what I put here are facts. If they are opinions, I am very clear on it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:25:18 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Another question is..Why did Posner hire his own Private Investigators when he was not even on the island when NH dissapeared?


To help with the inside cover up?


Posner also helping the Kalpoes with  Lawyer's out of Chicago?Or was that just refferal?


First I've heard of this.


Why that particular Law Firm? Why Chicago? Why not a Law Firm in Los Angelas or hundreds of other cities? He probably did not admit to the PI until the ABC station in Chicago proved it was a fact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:25:50 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I think it's important to specifiy when you make a statement that you make sure we know if it's a strong opinion or fact based upon research.

Sometimes we, me included, state things as if they are fact when they are actually opinion.


What I am saying are facts. I can't help if suspects or those involved statements disappear. But what I put here are facts. If they are opinions, I am very clear on it.

Thanks DKPen - I was actually thinking more about the Posner issue and the Kalpoes attorneys.  I also think it's coincidental the Kalpoes are using attorneys out of Chicago but I have no facts connecting to Posner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:29:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I think it's important to specifiy when you make a statement that you make sure we know if it's a strong opinion or fact based upon research.

Sometimes we, me included, state things as if they are fact when they are actually opinion.


What I am saying are facts. I can't help if suspects or those involved statements disappear. But what I put here are facts. If they are opinions, I am very clear on it.

Thanks DKPen - I was actually thinking more about the Posner issue and the Kalpoes attorneys.  I also think it's coincidental the Kalpoes are using attorneys out of Chicago but I have no facts connecting to Posner.


Coincidence or not, it does seem odd they contacted a lawyer out of Chicago. Gives reason for us to question. Or perhaps the lawyer is seeking recognition on a high profile case and contacted them. Guess something we may never know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 07, 2007, 03:29:58 PM
Tampa area when Joran went there over spring break to check out St. Leo University.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:30:55 PM
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:31:56 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Tampa area when Joran went there over spring break to check out St. Leo University.


Yes, that's it!  Thanks Kermit.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 07, 2007, 03:33:13 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"


Natalee phone calls: Beth had made a statement to Greta as they were leaving the Sloots house. "I got what I came here for", meaning she had known Natalee had been there because of the monkey screaming. It was the same sound in the back ground noise in the phone call. Beth was clear on that. Why she is retracting that statement as if she never said it I don't know.



If this the call they played for C Croes over and over, the monkey screaming in the background, they should be able to match up the phone call date and time since it is well documented. In addition, Beth in all honesty could say she didn't get a call from Natalee (if she didn't speak to her) and keep it under wraps.

This documented phone call from the Sloot residence would totally blow JPK2 stories out of the water and would be prime evidence, hence Beth would keep it quiet. One thing is for sure, that phone call must have had some substance because they would not have been playing it over and over again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:33:18 PM
Quote from: "*******"
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.


Yep, I know.  Just sometimes when we, me included, post it looks like fact when it's only a very suspcious coincidence that could be a fact.  Does that make sense?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:34:43 PM
Dayhiker - it would also answer why Beth is so certain Natalee was at the VDS residence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 07, 2007, 03:35:39 PM
Quote from: "*******"
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.



I find the Chicago connection more than coincidental, *******. If you wanted to cut to the chase you would hire LA attorneys who know the Cali court system better from having worked in it year in, year out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:35:52 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "dkpen"


Natalee phone calls: Beth had made a statement to Greta as they were leaving the Sloots house. "I got what I came here for", meaning she had known Natalee had been there because of the monkey screaming. It was the same sound in the back ground noise in the phone call. Beth was clear on that. Why she is retracting that statement as if she never said it I don't know.



If this the call they played for C Croes over and over, the monkey screaming in the background, they should be able to match up the phone call date and time since it is well documented. In addition, Beth in all honesty could say she didn't get a call from Natalee (if she didn't speak to her) and keep it under wraps.

This documented phone call from the Sloot residence would totally blow JPK2 stories out of the water and would be prime evidence, hence Beth would keep it quiet. One thing is for sure, that phone call must have had some substance because they would not have been playing it over and over again.


That is part of the reason they all stay clear away from NH after 2:40AM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:37:38 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "*******"
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.



I find the Chicago connection more than coincidental, *******. If you wanted to cut to the chase you would hire LA attorneys who know the Cali court system better from having worked in it year in, year out.


Of course you would!! Sooo many Law firms in LA that would be perfect to handle that lawsuit..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:39:23 PM
Ok 1 last Pic of Joran's feet :) Those shoes in this pic do not look like size 14!! You agree?

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/158069346_90d8aee97a.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:40:17 PM
Not sure about the shoe size but I have a sudden urge to push  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:41:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Not sure about the shoe size but I have a sudden urge to push  :lol:


LOL!! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:42:05 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "*******"
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.



I find the Chicago connection more than coincidental, *******. If you wanted to cut to the chase you would hire LA attorneys who know the Cali court system better from having worked in it year in, year out.


Of course you would!! Sooo many Law firms in LA that would be perfect to handle that lawsuit..



Unless the lawyer contacted them first. Some lawyers seek high profile cases for recognition.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:43:39 PM
******* - lets keep looking for Joran's shoes.  We might get lucky and find a pic where the size is on the bottom of the shoe or something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 03:43:51 PM
Should we help push this page to 50?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 07, 2007, 03:43:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Dayhiker - it would also answer why Beth is so certain Natalee was at the VDS residence.



Exactly. This may be one piece of evidence that has been witheld from day one and never brought out in the filings. If they can place Nat at the house around 3:00 am it is curtains for the Sloots. Especially if it was on one of their, or a friend like Sander's, phones. Remember, Nat did not have international dialing. The Sloots would not be calling a member or friend of the victim. Game over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:44:32 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "*******"
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.



I find the Chicago connection more than coincidental, *******. If you wanted to cut to the chase you would hire LA attorneys who know the Cali court system better from having worked in it year in, year out.


Of course you would!! Sooo many Law firms in LA that would be perfect to handle that lawsuit..



Unless the lawyer contacted them first. Some lawyers seek high profile cases for recognition.


Good point.  There are ATA offices all over the country too.  Could be someone affiliated with ATA recommended them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 03:45:08 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Dayhiker - it would also answer why Beth is so certain Natalee was at the VDS residence.



Exactly. This may be one piece of evidence that has been witheld from day one and never brought out in the filings. If they can place Nat at the house around 3:00 am it is curtains for the Sloots. Especially if it was on one of their, or a friend like Sander's, phones. Remember, Nat did not have international dialing. The Sloots would not be calling a member or friend of the victim. Game over.


Yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 07, 2007, 03:45:16 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Ok 1 last Pic of Joran's feet :) Those shoes in this pic do not look like size 14!! You agree?

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/158069346_90d8aee97a.jpg)



He looks like he's taking a dump.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:45:23 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "*******"
I never stated that is a fact that those attorneys from chicago are linked to posner..Although I am very suspicious... It is fact that he hired a PI from after NH went missing in Aruba though.



I find the Chicago connection more than coincidental, *******. If you wanted to cut to the chase you would hire LA attorneys who know the Cali court system better from having worked in it year in, year out.


Of course you would!! Sooo many Law firms in LA that would be perfect to handle that lawsuit..



Unless the lawyer contacted them first. Some lawyers seek high profile cases for recognition.


And they are working Pro Bono or whatever its called? This is gonna get mighty expensive for them..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 07, 2007, 03:47:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
It is on record that the ALE has possession of the casino records from May 29, 2005.

Janet


ABC 7 NEWS - CHICAGO
February 23, 2006


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.


So the question is...is Posner in on the coverup or not.  If not, I'd bet he still has all the surveilance videos from inside the casino that night.


Klaas ... Posner should not be in possession of those tapes ... potential evidence.  According to him ... he turned over the casino recordings from the evening of May 29, 2005 to the ALE.

However ... I do contend that Michael Posner, the owners of Carlos 'N Charlie's and the Van der Sloots have a stake in the outcome of the Natalee Holloway case.  Think about it ... if Joran Van der Sloot were to be held accountable ... the Excelsior ... Carlos 'N Charlies and ... Paulus Van der Sloot would be open to huge lawsuits by Natalee Family.  Joran was underage ... he should never have been allowed on the premises of those establishments by management or his father ... he should never have been allowed a line of credit ... he should never have been allowed to gamble ... he should never have been allowed to drink ... he should never have been afforded a VIP pass ...

Janet


John Q. Kelly
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 3, 2006


COSBY … John, first of all, is there a possibility that Paulus might have been talking to Natalee the night that she disappeared?

JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times. And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 07, 2007, 03:48:53 PM
Someone asked about statements from the MB kids as to whether Paulus was at the casino with Natalee or not


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement - July 12/05

After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 07, 2007, 03:49:30 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Ok 1 last Pic of Joran's feet :) Those shoes in this pic do not look like size 14!! You agree?

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/158069346_90d8aee97a.jpg)



No, they don't look like size 14. They look a lot like 10 1/2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 07, 2007, 03:58:23 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Someone asked about statements from the MB kids as to whether Paulus was at the casino with Natalee or not


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement - July 12/05

After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


Kermit ... Joran has acknowledged in his book that there was an older man sitting at the black jack table who looked just like Paulus.  I think this was included to challenge those who claim that it is his father in the casino video.  This has been Joran's agenda from day one ... distancing Paulus from any connection to Natalee Holloway.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 03:59:42 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "*******"
Ok 1 last Pic of Joran's feet :) Those shoes in this pic do not look like size 14!! You agree?

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/158069346_90d8aee97a.jpg)



No, they don't look like size 14. They look a lot like 10 1/2.


I totally agree!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 07, 2007, 04:01:31 PM
I can't check this right now (and will later tonight if no one else does).

Hayley Sagona - the person we noticed in the list of statements - w/urine sample?

I *think* she gave a witness statement on Aruba on 6/5.

I *think* she gave an FBI statement in Jamaica, NY, that involved wine samples on 6/6.

I *think* she gave a urine sample to a nurse in Huntington, NY, on 6/7.

I *think* the result - urine? wine? - was reported at the FBI lab in Quantico on 6/14.

This is based on my scribbles on some PostIts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 07, 2007, 04:01:46 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Someone asked about statements from the MB kids as to whether Paulus was at the casino with Natalee or not


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement - July 12/05

After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


Kermit ... Joran has acknowledged in his book that there was an older man sitting at the black jack table who looked just like Paulus.  I think this was included to challenge those who claim that it is his father in the casino video.  This has been Joran's agenda from day one ... distancing Paulus from any connection to Natalee Holloway.

Janet


Not only does it connect Paulus to Natalee...If you all noticed in the picture of Paulus at the gate speaking with Greta and Beth, Paulus is wearing the same "white" shirt he wore the night before. Guess in a hurry to get out front he just grabbed the first thing available to wear.
The  bastage!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Sue on May 07, 2007, 04:13:37 PM
Do we know when that Florida pic was taken?? remember Joran was only
17 when he met Natalee and Clearly Still growing..
He is fricken HUGE...  Nothing could convince me he wears a 10 1/2
shoe size nothing except seeing his shoe righ ton his feet and clearly
reading the size myself, My brothers are 5 '11 and 6 foot and they both
where  size 11 shoes and size wise there not even close to looking like the APE Joran looks like and my hubby is 5 '8 and wears a size 9


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 04:15:46 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Do we know when that Florida pic was taken?? remember Joran was only
17 when he met Natalee and Clearly Still growing..
He is fricken HUGE...  Nothing could convince me he wears a 10 1/2
shoe size nothing except seeing his shoe righ ton his feet and clearly
reading the size myself, My brothers are 5 '11 and 6 foot and they both
where  size 11 shoes and size wise there not even close to looking like the APE Joran looks like and my hubby is 5 '8 and wears a size 9

Judging by other pics in Florida and older pics of Joran's I'd say he was probably 17 when the Florida pic was taken.  He was probably there checking out colleges.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: robots on May 07, 2007, 04:20:40 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Do we know when that Florida pic was taken?? remember Joran was only
17 when he met Natalee and Clearly Still growing..
He is fricken HUGE...  Nothing could convince me he wears a 10 1/2
shoe size nothing except seeing his shoe righ ton his feet and clearly
reading the size myself, My brothers are 5 '11 and 6 foot and they both
where  size 11 shoes and size wise there not even close to looking like the APE Joran looks like and my hubby is 5 '8 and wears a size 9


i agree  8)

watching out behind me in case Anna is around  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 07, 2007, 04:21:50 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 615

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1125


Title: Lively Case Discussion #614 5/5 - 5/6/2007
Post by: Observer on May 07, 2007, 04:22:25 PM
I know its extremely difficult to judge his shoe size but I am looking at the shoe in perspective to his ankle. It just does not look like size 14.IMO..If I was sitting next to him I am almost sure my shoes would be bigger..I wear size 12.