Caylee Marie Anthony, 2, FL Missing since June 16-just reported by mother #33

[chocolatetyh34]

Morning Monkeys - looks like the stalker cam is working.  Ominous sun glare - lets take that as a sign that light is being shed on this case!

I do believe something is about to go down soon! The media hasnt really been covering the case for a couple of days. And with the way LP keep talking......he knows!!
Looks like their starting to back the Anthonys and JB in a corner.

[klaasend]

Morning Monkeys - looks like the stalker cam is working.  Ominous sun glare - lets take that as a sign that light is being shed on this case!

It is a new picture but the flag doesn't appear to be moving again. 

[chocolatetyh34]

Has anyone been able to find a copy of that witness list yet?

I keep looking, but no

me too.... Thanks tomm

[A_News_Junkie_Monkey]

The glare is worse than when I first pulled it up.  Yes, definitely new and a car in the drive.  Time will tell.

[chocolatetyh34]

 

When I said planted I mean by the people who found them, looking for some lime light.
That can be true....I just wish they hurry up and arrest the lil skank. Caylee deserve justice and to be at peace! Its going on almost 4mths now."thats she's been gone"  What is wrong with this family?? Makes me upset!!
[/quote]

[spanky]

I'm new here and, I must admit, quite caught up in this case. There a lot of interesting information here. I was drawn to join due to something I noticed in the photos from an early search. I'm specifically talking about these photos:

http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee001.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee002.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee003.JPG

I have an extensive background in design and photography and as soon as I saw these images I noticed that the teal / blue of the panties looked out of place with the rest of the image. The saturation looks really "hot" and the color seems more flat than the rest of the image. I downloaded the images and took a look at the exif data for them. The camera used was a Panasonic DMC-FZ7. This is a 6.0-megapixel 12x optical zoom camera and should produce very nice clean images (as these are). All the settings look "normal" for what you'd expect. If I compare the shadowing, saturation, and texture of the teal / blue to the rest of the image it has the appearance that it could have been enhanced or even edited in. The only thing that I do see in the exif data is that the light source for the image was tungsten (incandescent) vs. daylight. That seems a little odd since the image was shot outside in what appears to be good natural light. This could be due to using a flash that isn't recognized by the camera.

I'm 100% not suggesting that the image HAS been altered... it's just something that I noticed and thought I'd share.

[klaasend]

I'm new here and, I must admit, quite caught up in this case. There a lot of interesting information here. I was drawn to join due to something I noticed in the photos from an early search. I'm specifically talking about these photos:

http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee001.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee002.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee003.JPG

I have an extensive background in design and photography and as soon as I saw these images I noticed that the teal / blue of the panties looked out of place with the rest of the image. The saturation looks really "hot" and the color seems more flat than the rest of the image. I downloaded the images and took a look at the exif data for them. The camera used was a Panasonic DMC-FZ7. This is a 6.0-megapixel 12x optical zoom camera and should produce very nice clean images (as these are). All the settings look "normal" for what you'd expect. If I compare the shadowing, saturation, and texture of the teal / blue to the rest of the image it has the appearance that it could have been enhanced or even edited in. The only thing that I do see in the exif data is that the light source for the image was tungsten (incandescent) vs. daylight. That seems a little odd since the image was shot outside in what appears to be good natural light. This could be due to using a flash that isn't recognized by the camera.

I'm 100% not suggesting that the image HAS been altered... it's just something that I noticed and thought I'd share.

Spanky - welcome!     Not sure I understand the technical side of it but I agree the photos appear to have a blue/green tint for some reason and it is not the actual color of the items found.  Also, FWIW, I did a comparison of the polkidot panties  and the panties/bra Casey wore and in my opinion they are not the same.

[mstam656]

I'm new here and, I must admit, quite caught up in this case. There a lot of interesting information here. I was drawn to join due to something I noticed in the photos from an early search. I'm specifically talking about these photos:

http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee001.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee002.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee003.JPG

I have an extensive background in design and photography and as soon as I saw these images I noticed that the teal / blue of the panties looked out of place with the rest of the image. The saturation looks really "hot" and the color seems more flat than the rest of the image. I downloaded the images and took a look at the exif data for them. The camera used was a Panasonic DMC-FZ7. This is a 6.0-megapixel 12x optical zoom camera and should produce very nice clean images (as these are). All the settings look "normal" for what you'd expect. If I compare the shadowing, saturation, and texture of the teal / blue to the rest of the image it has the appearance that it could have been enhanced or even edited in. The only thing that I do see in the exif data is that the light source for the image was tungsten (incandescent) vs. daylight. That seems a little odd since the image was shot outside in what appears to be good natural light. This could be due to using a flash that isn't recognized by the camera.

I'm 100% not suggesting that the image HAS been altered... it's just something that I noticed and thought I'd share.

Good Morning Monkeys

Great observation...I always thought the panties looked off too...why do you think someone would go to all that trouble to edit it in? 

[Blonde]

I'm new here and, I must admit, quite caught up in this case. There a lot of interesting information here. I was drawn to join due to something I noticed in the photos from an early search. I'm specifically talking about these photos:

http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee001.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee002.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee003.JPG

I have an extensive background in design and photography and as soon as I saw these images I noticed that the teal / blue of the panties looked out of place with the rest of the image. The saturation looks really "hot" and the color seems more flat than the rest of the image. I downloaded the images and took a look at the exif data for them. The camera used was a Panasonic DMC-FZ7. This is a 6.0-megapixel 12x optical zoom camera and should produce very nice clean images (as these are). All the settings look "normal" for what you'd expect. If I compare the shadowing, saturation, and texture of the teal / blue to the rest of the image it has the appearance that it could have been enhanced or even edited in. The only thing that I do see in the exif data is that the light source for the image was tungsten (incandescent) vs. daylight. That seems a little odd since the image was shot outside in what appears to be good natural light. This could be due to using a flash that isn't recognized by the camera.

I'm 100% not suggesting that the image HAS been altered... it's just something that I noticed and thought I'd share.

Just letting you know we have them all posted here.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3276.0

[always 1]

I think i'm invisible too

anyways... the Anthony's will hold the vigils in church...now that's a step in the right direction for a change.

NO, I see you!!  I didn't recognize your name though, LOL
yes, a definite change for the better.  I was glad to see that.

Outbull, I really like the way you think and appreciate your posts!!!

[KCJackie]

Hi, I'm new here - but have been lurking for quite a while.  This case is driving me crazy! 

I have been playing around with the phone records, and have found a area that could be close to the pics Red displayed.  According to her phone records June 17th she was in the following area for 8-10 minutes around 3:53 p.m. (she rcvd a text message from Tony at that time) Thank God he text her so the ping would show up at this exact time.  As far as I can tell - she only went this one time. (I'm not done sifting through all of them yet).

Hopefully this link will work.........<a href="http://atlas.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?formtype=latlong&latlongtype=decimal&latitude=28%2e456171000000001&longitude=%2d81%2e292204999999996&dtype=h">Map of Latitude: 28.459167<br>Longitude: -81.291667  </a>

this area is right behind the airport - let me know what you think.  Thanks.

[spanky]

Thanks for the welcome Klaas!

I agree with you that the found panties are not a match to the ones that KC has on in the pic. They don't have enough polka-dots.

I don't think that someone would go to the trouble to edit the images (especially considering who was searching and found them), and frankly if these were altered a much better job could have been done. The image sensor in digital cameras can do funny things sometimes and give you "odd" results.

I don't know.... I just can't get past the "odd-ness" about these images. But I'm a skeptic so that goes along with the territory.

[Monken]

I'm new here and, I must admit, quite caught up in this case. There a lot of interesting information here. I was drawn to join due to something I noticed in the photos from an early search. I'm specifically talking about these photos:

http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee001.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee002.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee003.JPG

I have an extensive background in design and photography and as soon as I saw these images I noticed that the teal / blue of the panties looked out of place with the rest of the image. The saturation looks really "hot" and the color seems more flat than the rest of the image. I downloaded the images and took a look at the exif data for them. The camera used was a Panasonic DMC-FZ7. This is a 6.0-megapixel 12x optical zoom camera and should produce very nice clean images (as these are). All the settings look "normal" for what you'd expect. If I compare the shadowing, saturation, and texture of the teal / blue to the rest of the image it has the appearance that it could have been enhanced or even edited in. The only thing that I do see in the exif data is that the light source for the image was tungsten (incandescent) vs. daylight. That seems a little odd since the image was shot outside in what appears to be good natural light. This could be due to using a flash that isn't recognized by the camera.

I'm 100% not suggesting that the image HAS been altered... it's just something that I noticed and thought I'd share.

Spanky - welcome!     Not sure I understand the technical side of it but I agree the photos appear to have a blue/green tint for some reason and it is not the actual color of the items found.  Also, FWIW, I did a comparison of the polkidot panties  and the panties/bra Casey wore and in my opinion they are not the same.

I don't believe they either, Klaas. The polka dot set Casey is wearing in the photos appear to me, to be Victorias Secret. The closeup image of the other pair linked here, has a tag that says Native Intimates which are very inexpensive by comparison. I don't believe she would "lower herself" to wear something cheap, know what I mean.....they're not related to this case IMO

[chocolatetyh34]

I'm new here and, I must admit, quite caught up in this case. There a lot of interesting information here. I was drawn to join due to something I noticed in the photos from an early search. I'm specifically talking about these photos:

http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee001.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee002.JPG
http://www.josephsjordan.com/caylee/Caylee003.JPG

I have an extensive background in design and photography and as soon as I saw these images I noticed that the teal / blue of the panties looked out of place with the rest of the image. The saturation looks really "hot" and the color seems more flat than the rest of the image. I downloaded the images and took a look at the exif data for them. The camera used was a Panasonic DMC-FZ7. This is a 6.0-megapixel 12x optical zoom camera and should produce very nice clean images (as these are). All the settings look "normal" for what you'd expect. If I compare the shadowing, saturation, and texture of the teal / blue to the rest of the image it has the appearance that it could have been enhanced or even edited in. The only thing that I do see in the exif data is that the light source for the image was tungsten (incandescent) vs. daylight. That seems a little odd since the image was shot outside in what appears to be good natural light. This could be due to using a flash that isn't recognized by the camera.

I'm 100% not suggesting that the image HAS been altered... it's just something that I noticed and thought I'd share.

Just letting you know we have them all posted here.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3276.0

Thanks you Spanky, Blonde & klaasend.....Again you all may have seen this stuff awhile ago.....I'm fairly new to whats going on.

[O4Bull]

I think i'm invisible too

anyways... the Anthony's will hold the vigils in church...now that's a step in the right direction for a change.

NO, I see you!!  I didn't recognize your name though, LOL
yes, a definite change for the better.  I was glad to see that.

Outbull, I really like the way you think and appreciate your posts!!!

thanks, Always!  I love reading your posts, you have a great sense of humor. 

[tomm9298]

Hi, I'm new here - but have been lurking for quite a while.  This case is driving me crazy! 

I have been playing around with the phone records, and have found a area that could be close to the pics Red displayed.  According to her phone records June 17th she was in the following area for 8-10 minutes around 3:53 p.m. (she rcvd a text message from Tony at that time) Thank God he text her so the ping would show up at this exact time.  As far as I can tell - she only went this one time. (I'm not done sifting through all of them yet).

Hopefully this link will work.........<a href="http://atlas.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?formtype=latlong&latlongtype=decimal&latitude=28%2e456171000000001&longitude=%2d81%2e292204999999996&dtype=h">Map of Latitude: 28.459167<br>Longitude: -81.291667  </a>

this area is right behind the airport - let me know what you think.  Thanks.

Thank you KC. It worked

Is there were Tim and his crew looked?

[A_News_Junkie_Monkey]

    Think that cam is froze again.  When I first pulled it up, the sun was behind house more to the right of the pic.  But, also - Klaas is correct, no flag moving and that sun is stuck.  I wonder if the anthony's have a device that disables it every time they fix it.  Oh well, maybe it will work again in two days.
Welcome new monkeys - like the way this new group thinks.  Klaas - check your nanner mail.

[O4Bull]

Hi, I'm new here - but have been lurking for quite a while.  This case is driving me crazy! 

I have been playing around with the phone records, and have found a area that could be close to the pics Red displayed.  According to her phone records June 17th she was in the following area for 8-10 minutes around 3:53 p.m. (she rcvd a text message from Tony at that time) Thank God he text her so the ping would show up at this exact time.  As far as I can tell - she only went this one time. (I'm not done sifting through all of them yet).

Hopefully this link will work.........<a href="http://atlas.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?formtype=latlong&latlongtype=decimal&latitude=28%2e456171000000001&longitude=%2d81%2e292204999999996&dtype=h">Map of Latitude: 28.459167<br>Longitude: -81.291667  </a>

this area is right behind the airport - let me know what you think.  Thanks.

if you're looking for a certain number I can probably help.  I've cut and pasted several things I've seen but cant say for sure where I got them all.  If it's okay to post the last 4#'s, then I can check against my files.
Welcome to the cage.

[KCJackie]

Hi, I'm new here - but have been lurking for quite a while.  This case is driving me crazy! 

I have been playing around with the phone records, and have found a area that could be close to the pics Red displayed.  According to her phone records June 17th she was in the following area for 8-10 minutes around 3:53 p.m. (she rcvd a text message from Tony at that time) Thank God he text her so the ping would show up at this exact time.  As far as I can tell - she only went this one time. (I'm not done sifting through all of them yet).

Hopefully this link will work.........<a href="http://atlas.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?formtype=latlong&latlongtype=decimal&latitude=28%2e456171000000001&longitude=%2d81%2e292204999999996&dtype=h">Map of Latitude: 28.459167<br>Longitude: -81.291667  </a>

this area is right behind the airport - let me know what you think.  Thanks.

if you're looking for a certain number I can probably help.  I've cut and pasted several things I've seen but cant say for sure where I got them all.  If it's okay to post the last 4#'s, then I can check against my files.
Welcome to the cage.

Thanks for the welcome!   7686, 7111, 1143, 9699

[KiahJ]

I went back through Caseys call logs a little...Found this...

6/24 11:20 am
6/24 14:48 pm
6/25 12:52 pm
6/25 13:36 pm
6/25 14:13 pm
6/25 14:18 pm

Casey called 407-671-0000

Lexus
305 N Semoran Blvd
Winter Park, FL 32792-4404
(407) 671-0000

Casey want a new car?

I saw that too but i think on google there was somewhere in the back of that she went in the woods somewhere

Why do you think she called there?

Didn't Ricardo and Dante both work fixing cars?  Any chance that one of them was working in the service department here?

Did we ever find out what Annie did for a living?  Perhaps she worked answering the phones there?  Seems weird that she would have called the phone there rather than cell numbers if it were any of her friends... unless her friend automatically would answer the phone...