Caylee Marie Anthony #153 12/09/09 - 12/16/09

[trimmonthelake]

I think so too Brandi.   

[Missiontoconvict]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

[trimmonthelake]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

Mission,I wondered the same thing. 

[NM]

One of the new images released
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-documents-20091209,0,5067054.story

This picture is so sad.  The shirt Caylee is wearing is the one found with the remains and there is clearly a bruise/spot under Caylee's eye.  There is someone standing in the doorway to the right of the TV, you can see their sneaker and leg.   Based on the E-guitar , is this Richardo's?

TV?  I thought it was her computer...

Hey that's the pix on the globe. So, the dirtbag was not wearing the party-down-blue-dress in the cropped Globe pix

Nice gams or gam CC

[no rose colored glasses]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

That could be, but with all that garbage, it just seems there should be more fingerprints.

[mizjay]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

I hope there might be a print on the can.
I was watching a show (48 Hours) the other night and the detectives had taken prints from all over the house, about 100 or so, out of those there were only a couple that were usable. The rest were incomplete or too smeared to be identified. Maybe the same here or liquid from the garbage messed them up???

And by the way, who puts a big bag of garbage in their car? My guess would be somebody who's trying to explain the gagging smell coming from her car. 

Mission,I wondered the same thing. 

[mizjay]

Oops, sorry, got in the quote box again.^^^^  j

[trimmonthelake]

Oops, sorry, got in the quote box again.^^^^  j

[Missiontoconvict]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

That could be, but with all that garbage, it just seems there should be more fingerprints.

I agree - this report is confusing to me. I wish we knew how to interpret the findings. 

[no rose colored glasses]

Oops, sorry, got in the quote box again.^^^^  j

That could be, some liquid could have spilled in the garbage bag, and that is why there is no prints.

[Missiontoconvict]

Oops, sorry, got in the quote box again.^^^^  j

Glad to know I am not the only one who does that.  You make a good point - perhaps the coke can had a perfect print on it and the other items were messed up.

[mizjay]

Oops, sorry, got in the quote box again.^^^^  j

That could be, some liquid could have spilled in the garbage bag, and that is why there is no prints.

Or prints all on top of prints or even with everything being scraped and mushed together in the bag, they got all rubbed off or the pattern got broken.??

[akmom]

Two of the items from the site that I am hoping may trace back to the Anthony's back yard are listed, one I saw before is black plastic called weed barrier.  There is also mention of a plant tag that I did not notice before.  I also believe that I saw mention of coffin flies both in the trunk and at the sight that match?

[mizjay]

Two of the items from the site that I am hoping may trace back to the Anthony's back yard are listed, one I saw before is black plastic called weed barrier.  There is also mention of a plant tag that I did not notice before.  I also believe that I saw mention of coffin flies both in the trunk and at the sight that match?

Wouldn't that be great? Hoping so!
BBL

[akmom]

I believe I may have been wrong about the flies.  I might have heard that on Kealing's video

[Ono]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

That could be, but with all that garbage, it just seems there should be more fingerprints.

Maybe there's DNA ...

[Tevye]

ddex, I'm sitting here shaking my head wondering the same thing, no prints 

Ok Monkeys help me out but if I am reading this right I take it that the coke can which is Article 1, Item H-51976 is not listed in the list of items where no visual latent could be seen.  It then states that the coke can (which is Article 1, Item H-51976) was secured and sent to the Evidence Section and taken into custody by Mr. Terry Gorman. Hmmmm I am taking this to mean that possible prints were on that coke can?

That could be, but with all that garbage, it just seems there should be more fingerprints.

From this I deduce that one method of fingerprinting produced no prints, but that another tech took it for additional testing. Like they knew there HAD to be a print on a Coke can.

[Fanny Mae]

Two of the items from the site that I am hoping may trace back to the Anthony's back yard are listed, one I saw before is black plastic called weed barrier.  There is also mention of a plant tag that I did not notice before.  I also believe that I saw mention of coffin flies both in the trunk and at the sight that match?

Nice to see you, AKMOM. 

Thank you everyone for the links to the documents and pictures today. 

Seeing those pictures of Caylee in the little pink shirt is making me crazy.  Didn't Spindy say that she had never seen a shirt like that? If the pictures were not taken on the day KC murdered her, then she would have had to wash it. I can't believe that Spindy didn't know she had a shirt like that. I guess that was another Spindyism.   

[akmom]

Thanks Fanny, I've been reading without signing in lately....I'm usually either unheard or laughed at, but just had to talk today.

[SunnyinTX]

Most of Documents released today....still working on them

http://s44.photobucket.com/albums/f13/Caylee_Is_Missing/Doc%20Dump%20Dec%209%202009/



Casey's wages show not working since 1st Quarter 2006 (I'm shocked!)

And I can't see any way that the A's,, at least Cindy, didn't know she wasn't working. Just like I find it difficult to believe she, Cindy believed the Nanny story.....what in the hell was happening those 2 years?