Caylee Marie Anthony #184 3/07/11 - 3/18/11

[flamom]

http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/27110579/detail.html
No Decision Yet On Casey's Key Statements
Judge Withholds Ruling On Motions
POSTED: 5:10 pm EST March 7, 2011
UPDATED: 5:26 pm EST March 7, 2011

Raw Video: George Anthony Reacts to Prosecutor: http://www.wesh.com/video/27109012/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates

OMG Trim...Thanks for posting that link to GA. He was shaking his head no but it had no connection to what LDB was saying.  This weekend I watched some of the old Rosebud and Rosebuddy TV appearances from the past and I know why lawyers tell people to avoid the media. They will talk her right into the death chamber.. 

[trimmonthelake]

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/03/casey-anthony-could-she-hold-her-own-or-was-she-victim-of-conspiracy.html
Casey Anthony: Could she hold her own or was she victim of conspiracy?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG, WOFL — posted by halboedeker on March, 7 2011 6:32 PM
Day 4 in the Casey Anthony hearings, and the attorneys supplied the drama.

They have styles that echo pop culture. Defense attorney Cheney Mason is the showboating good old boy; it’s as if Big Daddy from “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” had decided to practice law. Don’t you expect him to say mendacity?

Prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick has a determined, precise style — think Glenn Close in “Jagged Edge.”
 ::snipping2::

[TURBOTHINK]

I'm sure George and Cindy will be among the first to testify at trial.  They can go sit in the gallery once they've testified right?  Wonder how long that will last?  We should start a monkey pool with bananas!

If they can be recalled as a witness they cannot come into the court room at all until they are totally dismissed as a witness. That will make them crazy because I would bet the defense will hold them until it is over just for rebuttals if they think it is necessary.

Turbo, I have a very dumb question, but here goes...

What would keep them from recording or TIVOing the hearing and watching it later? Wouldn't that be illegal?

I would bet money they do that. Is it illegal? I would guess it was, but how would the court prove it. Usually the judge advises them not to discuss their testimony with anyone and not to allow anyone to discuss their testimony with them. I have never heard of that happening but until the last few years, there was not the electronic access like it is now. I always suspected that was done in the Anna Nichole Smith case in the Florida hearings because of the almost exact wording in some of the testimony by witnesses who were kept separate.

[ZooMomology]

So, just finished watching them all and if I were JBP, I would clearly have to go with the State on this one.  Linda was based in fact, Jar just tried to muddy the waters.  He completely aggravates the heck out of me.

I cannot be sure though what the outcome will be.  JBP does not seem to mind the idiotness of Jar and the fact that he embellishes over and over again and everything is stated in an accusatory fashion. 

So, we shall see.  We have to wait a whole week?  Grrrr.

[tupelohoney]

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/03/casey-anthony-could-she-hold-her-own-or-was-she-victim-of-conspiracy.html
Casey Anthony: Could she hold her own or was she victim of conspiracy?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG, WOFL — posted by halboedeker on March, 7 2011 6:32 PM
Day 4 in the Casey Anthony hearings, and the attorneys supplied the drama.

They have styles that echo pop culture. Defense attorney Cheney Mason is the showboating good old boy; it’s as if Big Daddy from “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” had decided to practice law. Don’t you expect him to say mendacity?

Prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick has a determined, precise style — think Glenn Close in “Jagged Edge.”
 ::snipping2::

 ::snipping2::


What would it take to get Anthony’s statements tossed from the trial? The Miranda rights have to be given when a person is in “custodial interrogation,” Pipitone explained. “To determine that the judge has to look at the purpose, place and manner of questioning,” Pipitone added. “It’s up to the judge to determine if a reasonable person — not necessarily Casey Anthony — but a reasonable person would believe under those circumstances that they were in custody.” 

 ::snipping2::

[tupelohoney]

Amil's post about the hearing(Thanks Amil)
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6194447&postcount=1019


http://callsforjustice.wordpress.com/2011/03/07/casey-anthony-motions-arguements/
Casey Anthony – Motions Arguments
03/07/2011 donchais

  Hi Amil!  Thanks for your take on today's hearing.  Yeah, you could hear the silence from here when LDB dropped the F bomb!  Oh well, it is what Casey made it to be!


Thanks for all the links Trimm!   

[joesamas mama]

I'm sure George and Cindy will be among the first to testify at trial.  They can go sit in the gallery once they've testified right?  Wonder how long that will last?  We should start a monkey pool with bananas!

If they can be recalled as a witness they cannot come into the court room at all until they are totally dismissed as a witness. That will make them crazy because I would bet the defense will hold them until it is over just for rebuttals if they think it is necessary.

Turbo, I have a very dumb question, but here goes...

What would keep them from recording or TIVOing the hearing and watching it later? Wouldn't that be illegal?

I would bet money they do that. Is it illegal? I would guess it was, but how would the court prove it. Usually the judge advises them not to discuss their testimony with anyone and not to allow anyone to discuss their testimony with them. I have never heard of that happening but until the last few years, there was not the electronic access like it is now. I always suspected that was done in the Anna Nichole Smith case in the Florida hearings because of the almost exact wording in some of the testimony by witnesses who were kept separate.

Thanks Turbo, my first thoughts were George and Cindy didn't need to rehash what went on last week in court, they came to the monkeys and found links of their testimony and watched them. Sorry but I absolutely despise them both and don't put anything past them. Too bad they can't be sequestered without tv or internet like juries are. Thank you for answering my question. JSM

[Cappuccino]

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/03/casey-anthony-could-she-hold-her-own-or-was-she-victim-of-conspiracy.html
Casey Anthony: Could she hold her own or was she victim of conspiracy?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG, WOFL — posted by halboedeker on March, 7 2011 6:32 PM
Day 4 in the Casey Anthony hearings, and the attorneys supplied the drama.

They have styles that echo pop culture. Defense attorney Cheney Mason is the showboating good old boy; it’s as if Big Daddy from “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” had decided to practice law. Don’t you expect him to say mendacity?

Prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick has a determined, precise style — think Glenn Close in “Jagged Edge.”
 ::snipping2::

 ::snipping2::


What would it take to get Anthony’s statements tossed from the trial? The Miranda rights have to be given when a person is in “custodial interrogation,” Pipitone explained. “To determine that the judge has to look at the purpose, place and manner of questioning,” Pipitone added. “It’s up to the judge to determine if a reasonable person — not necessarily Casey Anthony — but a reasonable person would believe under those circumstances that they were in custody.” 

 ::snipping2::

She was not in custodial interrogation until after her Universal Studios stunt, it doesnt matter how hard the defense is attempting to make lemons out of lemonade.   The key word "reasonable" should make it more than obvious how CJBP should rule.

[tupelohoney]

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2011/03/casey-anthony-could-she-hold-her-own-or-was-she-victim-of-conspiracy.html
Casey Anthony: Could she hold her own or was she victim of conspiracy?
Caylee and Casey Anthony, George and Cindy Anthony, WESH, WFTV, WKMG, WOFL — posted by halboedeker on March, 7 2011 6:32 PM
Day 4 in the Casey Anthony hearings, and the attorneys supplied the drama.

They have styles that echo pop culture. Defense attorney Cheney Mason is the showboating good old boy; it’s as if Big Daddy from “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof” had decided to practice law. Don’t you expect him to say mendacity?

Prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick has a determined, precise style — think Glenn Close in “Jagged Edge.”
 ::snipping2::

 ::snipping2::


What would it take to get Anthony’s statements tossed from the trial? The Miranda rights have to be given when a person is in “custodial interrogation,” Pipitone explained. “To determine that the judge has to look at the purpose, place and manner of questioning,” Pipitone added. “It’s up to the judge to determine if a reasonable person — not necessarily Casey Anthony — but a reasonable person would believe under those circumstances that they were in custody.” 

 ::snipping2::

She was not in custodial interrogation until after her Universal Studios stunt, it doesnt matter how hard the defense is attempting to make lemons out of lemonade.   The key word "reasonable" should make it more than obvious how CJBP should rule.

[TURBOTHINK]

She was not in custodial interrogation until after her Universal Studios stunt, it doesnt matter how hard the defense is attempting to make lemons out of lemonade.   The key word "reasonable" should make it more than obvious how CJBP should rule.

[/quote]

From what I found reading the case law Mason cited ALL of the suspects were known suspects at the time they were detained. There was no reason to assume KC was a suspect because she was the child's mother until they caught her in all the lies at Universal. At that point they had to have some doubt about what really happened to Caylee. I think they thought KC sold her for drugs or something like that because of the insistence about the nanny having her and her family backing up the nanny story with tales of their own about how they knew the nanny. I don't think they really discredited the nanny thing until much later. Even when she was officially arrested for child endangerment for not reporting her missing for 31 days they were still looking for Caylee.

[Cappuccino]

She was not in custodial interrogation until after her Universal Studios stunt, it doesnt matter how hard the defense is attempting to make lemons out of lemonade.   The key word "reasonable" should make it more than obvious how CJBP should rule.

From what I found reading the case law Mason cited ALL of the suspects were known suspects at the time they were detained. There was no reason to assume KC was a suspect because she was the child's mother until they caught her in all the lies at Universal. At that point they had to have some doubt about what really happened to Caylee. I think they thought KC sold her for drugs or something like that because of the insistence about the nanny having her and her family backing up the nanny story with tales of their own about how they knew the nanny. I don't think they really discredited the nanny thing until much later. Even when she was officially arrested for child endangerment for not reporting her missing for 31 days they were still looking for Caylee.
[/quote]
 

[cookie]

reading backwards trying to catch up...listening and watching the video of today's events on another screen at the same time..
Jeremy Lyons, the detective just had a yellow legal paper folded in his hand...just like Casey folds the legal papers..I bet they are passing notes back and forth that way...is that supposed to happen???

[loca]

Has this been posted yet?

Motion For Relative Of Victim To Be Excluded From Rule Of Sequestration And Memorandum Of Law
March 2, 2011

http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/288745/65fd ... 867d0a.pdf

Court Minutes
March 2-3, 2011

http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/288745/3df4 ... f6d1cd.pdf

Loca- there's something wrong with the links.  There seems to be a section cut out.  MuffyBee

[loca]

Link to the Natalee Holloway Forum
Latest Discussion Thread for those that would like to follow and discuss the case:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=9215.0

thanks muffy for posting the link. I did not know how to find it as this is mainly where I frequent.

[tupelohoney]

Has this been posted yet?

Motion For Relative Of Victim To Be Excluded From Rule Of Sequestration And Memorandum Of Law
March 2, 2011

http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/288745/65fd ... 867d0a.pdf

Court Minutes
March 2-3, 2011

http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/288745/3df4 ... f6d1cd.pdf

links are bad or private....this is what I get:

AccessDeniedAccess Denied0ACDD39DCBD690E5QOshUjEqnT++CPbm2b+x10n5bGMjs+6g0pGmKnxmC/8p7Z3/uUdd1FN4cOuS27y+

I think part/parts of the link are cut out.  MuffyBee

[MuffyBee]

Link to the Natalee Holloway Forum
Latest Discussion Thread for those that would like to follow and discuss the case:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=9215.0

thanks muffy for posting the link. I did not know how to find it as this is mainly where I frequent.

YW loca.  I check Natalee's forum every day, hoping there will be justice soon for Natalee and Stephany. 

[tupelohoney]

Has this been posted yet?

Motion For Relative Of Victim To Be Excluded From Rule Of Sequestration And Memorandum Of Law
March 2, 2011

http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/288745/65fd ... 867d0a.pdf

Court Minutes
March 2-3, 2011

http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/288745/3df4 ... f6d1cd.pdf

links are bad or private....this is what I get:

AccessDeniedAccess Denied0ACDD39DCBD690E5QOshUjEqnT++CPbm2b+x10n5bGMjs+6g0pGmKnxmC/8p7Z3/uUdd1FN4cOuS27y+

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/73107238/20110302-Motion-for-Relative-of-Victim-To-be-Excluded-from-Sequestration

 It pizzes me off that they will only acknowledge that Caylee is the victim when it gets them what they want.  She's still being used as a pawn by them.

[tupelohoney]

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/73107588/20110303-04-Court-Minutes

Here's the court minutes link

[cookie]

I agree with whom ever said on here in the last thread that Cindy looked drugged up..
watching Linda now as I missed it earlier..
thanks everyone for the info and the links...

[tupelohoney]

Here's the link to Muzikzman's docstoc collection    http://www.docstoc.com/profile/muzikman