Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: Nut44x4 on February 19, 2009, 06:10:15 AM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/09 - 2/25/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on February 19, 2009, 06:10:15 AM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:08:55 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 01:09:22 AM
Whew....thanks.     ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 21, 2009, 01:11:27 AM
Thanks 2NJ, I was slacking  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 01:14:52 AM
Thanks 2NJ, I was slacking  ::MonkeyWink::


Don't make me say the L word.           ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:15:09 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:16:03 AM
Klaas, Dottie wanted someone to post the trap pics. 

Mine are not all together, do you have yours handy? 

TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 01:16:36 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

Carry on, monkeys. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 21, 2009, 01:16:59 AM
Klaas, Dottie wanted someone to post the trap pics. 

Mine are not all together, do you have yours handy? 

TIA

Not really but let me see what I can do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:18:32 AM
Klaas, Dottie wanted someone to post the trap pics. 

Mine are not all together, do you have yours handy? 

TIA

Not really but let me see what I can do.

Thanks Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 01:18:56 AM
Klaas, Dottie wanted someone to post the trap pics. 

Mine are not all together, do you have yours handy? 

TIA

Dottie,

Look here.  Blonde has many pics on this thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:19:15 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

Carry on, monkeys. 

Nite 2NJ!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 01:23:58 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

Carry on, monkeys. 

Nite 2NJ!   ::MonkeyCool::

I feel good (a little James Brown)...Dottie & KTF are in Blonde's thread. 

G'nite.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 21, 2009, 01:25:45 AM
I just grabbed a bunch of the trap pics I have.  There may be a couple of duplicates in this group.  Pay attention to the date/time stamp:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/TrapCloseup.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap2.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap2a.jpg)


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap3.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap5.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap6.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm1.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm2-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 01:26:30 AM
Klaas, Dottie wanted someone to post the trap pics. 

Mine are not all together, do you have yours handy? 

TIA

Dottie,

Look here.  Blonde has many pics on this thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0
YES THEY ARE THERE....THANKS!!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:29:22 AM
I'm back.Was just taking a look at all those people on the Persistence.Pisses me off to no end to believe that there was not one person on that ship who cared enough about a girl or her parents! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 01:30:06 AM
I just grabbed a bunch of the trap pics I have.  There may be a couple of duplicates in this group.  Pay attention to the date/time stamp:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/TrapCloseup.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap2.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap2a.jpg)


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap3.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap5.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap6.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm1.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm2-1.jpg)

Thanks Klass, Wow... I seen them before but they are amazing.  Is it the general consensus from everyone that this is indeed Natalie!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:31:50 AM
We'll never know now will we? ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 01:33:42 AM


Sorry for the typo KLAAS!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 01:34:53 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::
TM,
Thank you for the pictures of Natalee. I look forward to seeing them every night.
Natalee was a real person, with a loving family. She lost her life while vacationing in aruba may 2005.
We will never forget! Justice for Natalee aruba.....we won't go away....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 01:35:04 AM
We'll never know now will we? ::MonkeyRoll::
Unbelievable  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:37:32 AM
We'll never know now will we? ::MonkeyRoll::
Unbelievable  ::MonkeyNoNo::

It's very,very sad Dottie! ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:41:04 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::
TM,
Thank you for the pictures of Natalee. I look forward to seeing them every night.
Natalee was a real person, with a loving family. She lost her life while vacationing in aruba may 2005.
We will never forget! Justice for Natalee aruba.....we won't go away....

Dave and Beth Holloway are the epitome of wonderful people!As the parent of a 9yr old daughter i must say i would not have been so wonderful.I would have hired and trained with a para-military group and enlisted the services of BILLB....You know the rest of the Story BillB! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:41:42 AM
I'm back.Was just taking a look at all those people on the Persistence.Pisses me off to no end to believe that there was not one person on that ship who cared enough about a girl or her parents! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I'm pissed off too KTF!   ::MonkeyWaa::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:48:13 AM
I'm back.Was just taking a look at all those people on the Persistence.Pisses me off to no end to believe that there was not one person on that ship who cared enough about a girl or her parents! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I'm pissed off too KTF!   ::MonkeyWaa::





My heart cry's out for hope that guilt will eat those people from the inside out!Kyle named his daughter after the girl that he should be fighting for but he chose the path of least resistence.What a shame! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:48:54 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::
TM,
Thank you for the pictures of Natalee. I look forward to seeing them every night.
Natalee was a real person, with a loving family. She lost her life while vacationing in aruba may 2005.
We will never forget! Justice for Natalee aruba.....we won't go away....

You're welcome billb.  I love doing it.  My oldest son is Natalee's age.  I can't look at her without thinking of him, and "what if" I were in her parent's shoes.  It breaks my heart.  I want everyone to remember her, and I hope the pictures help keep us all focused and determined to never ever give up!

Aruba can just get over thinking we're ever going away!  Forty years....whatever it takes.  We'll still be trying to find Justice for Natalee and her family!  I would hope that there would be those that would feel the way we do, if it were me.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 01:55:35 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::
TM,
Thank you for the pictures of Natalee. I look forward to seeing them every night.
Natalee was a real person, with a loving family. She lost her life while vacationing in aruba may 2005.
We will never forget! Justice for Natalee aruba.....we won't go away....

Dave and Beth Holloway are the epitome of wonderful people!As the parent of a 9yr old daughter i must say i would not have been so wonderful.I would have hired and trained with a para-military group and enlisted the services of BILLB....You know the rest of the Story BillB! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

My husband has said some very similar things....  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 01:59:10 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::
TM,
Thank you for the pictures of Natalee. I look forward to seeing them every night.
Natalee was a real person, with a loving family. She lost her life while vacationing in aruba may 2005.
We will never forget! Justice for Natalee aruba.....we won't go away....

Dave and Beth Holloway are the epitome of wonderful people!As the parent of a 9yr old daughter i must say i would not have been so wonderful.I would have hired and trained with a para-military group and enlisted the services of BILLB....You know the rest of the Story BillB! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

My husband has said some very similar things....  ::MonkeyCool::


You've got a good husband TM! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:02:27 AM
                           



                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

 ::MonkeyCool::
TM,
Thank you for the pictures of Natalee. I look forward to seeing them every night.
Natalee was a real person, with a loving family. She lost her life while vacationing in aruba may 2005.
We will never forget! Justice for Natalee aruba.....we won't go away....

Dave and Beth Holloway are the epitome of wonderful people!As the parent of a 9yr old daughter i must say i would not have been so wonderful.I would have hired and trained with a para-military group and enlisted the services of BILLB....You know the rest of the Story BillB! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

My husband has said some very similar things....  ::MonkeyCool::


You've got a good husband TM! ::MonkeyDance::

Yes I do!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:02:27 AM
Just flippin through the pages of BonDia....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:04:30 AM
Just flippin through the pages of BonDia....

I couldn't get it to load earlier, got mad and quit!  Maybe I'll try again!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:07:00 AM
Just flippin through the pages of BonDia....

I couldn't get it to load earlier, got mad and quit!  Maybe I'll try again!   ::MonkeyWink::

Maybe some interesting stuff about Miguel Maduro.I think they accepted somthing??TM can read it much better.. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:09:16 AM
Just flippin through the pages of BonDia....

I couldn't get it to load earlier, got mad and quit!  Maybe I'll try again!   ::MonkeyWink::

Maybe some interesting stuff about Miguel Maduro.I think they accepted somthing??TM can read it much better.. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yeah right!   ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 02:10:32 AM
Good Night texasmom, Keepthefaith, 2NJSons_Mom and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
We are all here for the right reasons...Natalee is everyone's daughter. I can't help but think of my 3 daughters when I think of Natalee, Beth, Dave, and their families...
The efforts the Monkeys put forth for Natalee truly touches my heart....
Justice WILL be served!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:11:57 AM
Good Night texasmom, Keepthefaith, 2NJSons_Mom and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
We are all here for the right reasons...Natalee is everyone's daughter. I can't help but think of my 3 daughters when I think of Natalee, Beth, Dave, and their families...
The efforts the Monkeys put forth for Natalee truly touches my heart....
Justice WILL be served!


 
Goodnight and God bless BillB. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:14:05 AM
Looks like Underwater Expeditions will be taking their maiden voyage tomorrow!

http://underwaterexpeditions.com/calendar/May2008.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:15:08 AM
Quote
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -Tamikosmom
« Reply #900 on: February 20, 2009, 08:49:12 PM »
Kermit ... I believe this quote is very important but ... I cannot locate it.  I went to CAPS profile and the following post shows as his very first submission to the SM forum.  I tried googling ... thinking that it may have been a Front Page comment but ... nothing.

Could the post regarding the "remains" have been deleted upon request

Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:
Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605914

Remains were taken Jan 7th.
(it was a typo Ms. Janet, sorry for the confusion)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:15:26 AM
Good Night texasmom, Keepthefaith, 2NJSons_Mom and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
We are all here for the right reasons...Natalee is everyone's daughter. I can't help but think of my 3 daughters when I think of Natalee, Beth, Dave, and their families...
The efforts the Monkeys put forth for Natalee truly touches my heart....
Justice WILL be served!


Goodnight billb, God bless you and your family!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:16:28 AM
Quote
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -Tamikosmom
« Reply #900 on: February 20, 2009, 08:49:12 PM »
Kermit ... I believe this quote is very important but ... I cannot locate it.  I went to CAPS profile and the following post shows as his very first submission to the SM forum.  I tried googling ... thinking that it may have been a Front Page comment but ... nothing.

Could the post regarding the "remains" have been deleted upon request

Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:
Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605914

Remains were taken Jan 7th.
(it was a typo Ms. Janet, sorry for the confusion)





Must be hard to type with LiL' Froggy Fingers.. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:17:55 AM
Capslockwizard on December 31st, 2007 6:19 pm

Dear Bloggers,
After The FBI in Birmingham finsh reading my report. I will post my finding on this stie to what realy happens to Natalee. In the report you will also find that the plan was between the four of them but 2 of the perps was late to the private party.

Hope that The FBI open their e-mail. it was send today to the FBI Special Agent Carmen S. Adams – Birmingham@ic.fbi.gov
_______________________
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/31/weapons-crack-down-at-carlos-n-charlies-this-is-a-tourist-destination/

Capslockwizard on December 31st, 2007 7:43 pm

Klaasend: are you working
_______________________
SM: Not really right now or for the rest of today. I will be working tomorrow though. (klaasend)
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/31/weapons-crack-down-at-carlos-n-charlies-this-is-a-tourist-destination/

Capslockwizard on December 31st, 2007 10:06 pm

Busacaruba: You must have those viewing glasses that the MEP is selling. Once you put it on you will not be able to see the whole picture about tourism nor where you are going… I do think they used them also on jackasses.
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/31/weapons-crack-down-at-carlos-n-charlies-this-is-a-tourist-destination/

Capslockwizard on January 1st, 2008 4:03 pm

Klaasend: Did you received it.

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/31/weapons-crack-down-at-carlos-n-charlies-this-is-a-tourist-destination/


Capslockwizard on January 1st, 2008 7:56 pm

klaasend: update in the wire

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/31/weapons-crack-down-at-carlos-n-charlies-this-is-a-tourist-destination/

#  Capslockwizard on January 2nd, 2008 6:14 pm

Klaasend: I did send it to the … last night.

Did BT received it.
_______________________
SM: It was sent but no response yet. Thanks for all your hard work!
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/12/31/weapons-crack-down-at-carlos-n-charlies-this-is-a-tourist-destination/




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:19:12 AM
Kermit.Is this the boat that they leased back?

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:21:11 AM
Kermit.Is this the boat that they leased back?

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html

Might be an old page.Sorry! ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:26:30 AM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:28:48 AM
Caps emails Dave: I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS.

Caps said his uncle is an attorney.
Why would John be the go-between rather then an attorney or LE?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:33:50 AM
Kermit.Is this the boat that they leased back?

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html

Might be an old page.Sorry! ::MonkeyConfused::
Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:38:17 AM
Quote
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -Tamikosmom
« Reply #900 on: February 20, 2009, 08:49:12 PM »
Kermit ... I believe this quote is very important but ... I cannot locate it.  I went to CAPS profile and the following post shows as his very first submission to the SM forum.  I tried googling ... thinking that it may have been a Front Page comment but ... nothing.

Could the post regarding the "remains" have been deleted upon request

Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:
Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605914

Remains were taken Jan 7th.
(it was a typo Ms. Janet, sorry for the confusion)





Must be hard to type with LiL' Froggy Fingers.. ::MonkeyTongue::

LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:38:51 AM
    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #361 on: December 31, 2008, 06:00:38 PM »
   
Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:

Quote
CapslockWizard wrote:
ok, I have read all your comments and I was wondering…. If the boddy can not be found is because it is put where nobody should look for…

Wel the only answer that I can come up with is a cemetary among all the other deads in Aruba… but the question is which one.

I aruba when someone day they do not usually put their dead in the ground but in something called a Kelder… A Kelder is like a small place made form stone where the families will burried their loveones. Most of them are sealed but you can find one that is open and put a body in one and seal it with only 5 cement block and a coat of paint and no one will ever look there. becuase it is the cemetary.

So Nathally must be in a cemetary and thats why it can not be found and thats my logic.

Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:

Quote
Capslockwizard wrote:

This is my analysis about the disappearing and the events on that day. There are two possible scenarios that will fit a logic question.
The Logic question is “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”

Tools I have used are:

1. Goolge Earth with Aruba MAP and area location to pin possible scenarios.
2. Time Line Event of the case.
3. My logic and Strategic thinking on solving problems.
4. Ttime line from the website http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html
I believe there is a fundamental flaw the way the authorities see the case.
If the Investigators cannot find Nathalie is because they are searching and looking in the wrong places or they must know but would not come forward.
If you ask yourself this question: “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”
The answers are a lot of places can be used, but for a logic thinker there is only one answer.
And form all the articles that I have read, nobody have suggested and even mention this place.
TEST LOGIG SENARIO 1:
In Aruba in when someone dies, they can be put to rest in two ways.

1. In the grounds. But this procedure has stop due to not enough cemetery.

2. In a Kelder. A Kelder is a place above ground with 4 or 6 rooms constructed out of brick and mortar inside a Cemetery. These Kelders belong to a Family and they buy these plots form the church in the cemetery and build the Kelders on it and leave it open for when the moment arrived you have a place to rest.

Both types of method funerals will take place only in a CEMETARY.

There are several (7) CEMETARY in Aruba and most of them have KELDERS and a lot are left OPEN for when he or she dies will be buried close in the Family plot. From those seven, three is close from my analysis and from those 3, the one in Noord is to visible and no high walls. The one in Ponton/ Oranjestad is in public site from the front but from the back it has possibilities. The one in Paradera has most likely and it has a wall but anybody with a pickup or can climb easy over the wall second it is no visible from public site.

The reason that no one can find her is that she must be among all the dead in the cemetery and who is going to search a cemetery for a body where there is already a lot of body in the place.
You will never find an open grave in the ground because when someone dies in Aruba and need to be buried in the ground, the Funeral home in charge of the body will give orders to dig a grave for this person in a district in accordance with the family wishes.

To dig a grave 6 feet deep and wide enough for a body will take a lot of time by hand. Beside the ground will look disturb by the cemetery keeper. So I believe that these 4 perps would not have the time to dig a grave.

But

If you have a dead body on your hand and you need to hide it fast, the only way is to put it in an open Kelder and with only five to 6 bricks and and a bucket of cement and you are done. And if you want to make it look professional, can even give it a coat of paint color white which is the mostly use.

This last process is very easy done with 3 or 4 person.

a. Move dead body to a cemetery,

b. Cemetery door closed, then jump the fence with the body.

c. Inside the cemetery look for an open Kelder or break one open.

d. Put body in it

e. Go and get 6 pieces of bricks or use bricks that are in the cemetery already.

f. Make cement in a bucket

g. Use the bricks to close the small walls of the Kelder.

h. Paint the wall

And you are done.

The flaws with this logic are that it do not account for a missing shoe.
And so this cannot be complete true and do not compute. But possible

TEST LOGIG SENARIO 2:

1. Normaly if one want to have sex in Aruba that comes from the clubs go to a place call WHITEHOUSE and not the LIGHTHOUSE and they sound almost identical (Here I think ether the Investigator hear it wrong and JoraN and K2 continue with the kakamenia storie about the LightHouse or it was plan-out between them.) The Whitehouse is an apartment Complex where one drive in with the car into an Apartment with automatic garage doors attached. One in the garage you are also in the apartment. These apartments are for some to go and have sex in and one pay 50.00 for a couple of hours use. If foul play was committed in one of these rooms or if she was overdosed in one of these rooms, nobody will see or hear. Add checkout time you just hop in your car in the garage and drive out to the gate and no one will notice anything as she could be asleep in the back seat. Now you have a dead body that you have to get rid of in your car… you could not bring a dead body to a hotel… you have to get rid of it…and here is my view of what next move will be.

2. The next move is to look for a place to dump the body and here is where the missing shoes come to play and also the story that they were driving around statement comes to play a role). It is dark, almost 3:00 am and in Aruba there are several murky water reservoirs that can be used to dump the body (see Google Earth – Aruba) in it and she would be gone. But the question is which one? Well looking at the map you can see that from the Whitehouse Building there several c that can be used and there is one behind the Whitehouse building. Once first instinct is to dump the body there since it is closely when you exit the Whitehouse building. Now here is where it gets interesting depending how many people you have to help you carry the body to the murky pool. And not knowing that the closer you get to one of these murky pools, your feet will sink into this thick mud and when you try to pull your feet out, it will not come out because the mud has a suction that seals around the plastic of the sneakers and the only way out is to pull your feet out of the sneakers and leave the sneakers behind.
Also when you are in a hurry to get rid of the body you will not think to go get your sneakers and it is dark in that area. And I believe that that’s why Joram was without a sneaker. Now there is still a question not answer, Was Joran alone or did he got help? Knowing what we know from all that has been written about the case and blog out there. We know that the Kalpoes came to help. I do believe that Joran is stronger and weight more and that he Dump the body in one of these reservoirs and that’s why he lost his shoes. Now Joran is bear feet walking? From where was he coming from?. One thing is sure he was going to papa and mama. But what happened to the helpers? Why they did not drive Joran home. Or was it that Joran acted alone and called the Kalpoes after all what has happened to him.

3. Other scenarios about putting the body in a crypt I do believe that this was done after they arrested the 2 black men that was blamed for the crime that they did not commit.

4. Here is where the Father with help of …????…..(to be filled in ) went back and make sure that the body will disappears forever. How? Depends on the two scenarios. A) if the body is in the murky water and in the mud they would try to get it back and buried it in a cemetery among the death and that will be a difficult task to open all the graves in Aruba. B) to make sure the body is deep in the murky water with the shoes of Joran so that it will not be found.
The Fathers logic thinking would be like this. Now nobody will find her because we hide it so well, nobody is going to look in a cemetery or in the Murky Waters of Aruba and if you are going to search where to begin and with time the longer the body stays in the mud, the deeper it will sink and these are fresh water reservoirs and not salt water and the body will not come up never. As for the cemetery theory, it will be difficult to search without disturbing the graves. and another drawback is that you need permission of the families to open all the Kelders.
My Review:
With Google Earth I was able to pinpoint the possible location where one can lose a shoe in the mud and also how far it is from the Whitehouse Location and keeping an eye on the time to do the job.
The story about dumping the body on the beach cannot be done because you have already a dead body on your hand and you can do that. The chance to be seen with a dead body to high and risky.
Finding someone to dump it in the ocean means more people involved and the chance to be snitch on will increase and the chance to be seen by the coast guard is high. Also body will float back if not tied down in on the bottom floor of the sea.. This requires a more depth knowledge of buoyancy and understanding of the ocean currents of Aruba and knowing that when the wind turn even sunken boats come back to shore. No this does not compute either.

Conclusion:
the only way the body can be found is to search for the shoes round the edges for the murky pools in Aruba and when the sneaker is found, the body will be there also.

The reason they got away is that there is not a body to link the crime to.
The Father of Joran stated clearly that if there is NOT A BODY there will be NO CASE.

So to make the above statement true, the perps must have make sure that the body cannot be found, but they forgot one thing, a Body will be decompose slowly in mud and it will be found with time. Ask Aruba to search the edged of all these murky water reservoirs and where you find the sneakers you will find the body

Its is like the OJ case “The Glove does not Fit then you must quit the case” but in this case we have a missing link that is the shoes of Joran V/D Sloot.

Please review and Let me know what you bloggers think of this

Best Regards
Casplockwizard@hotmail.com

Dec 23, 7:44 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605914



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:40:02 AM
Kyle said: My opinion on Simian is that he is a detective/cop involved in the case since the beginning. My understanding is that there is only one of the originals remaining. He came to us during the search along with his brother who had a "vision" on where Natalee was disposed. The vision was cryptic and actually contained a latitude which from what he claimed could have been anywhere in the world. The brother thought they were coordinates, but it was just a latitude. Oddly, the latitude was within a half mile from where we found the trap and centered on Arashi beach.
<snip>
He spoke well enough english and knew everything in my opinion.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605914



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:41:20 AM
Good night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:44:41 AM
Good night.


Goodnight Kermit!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:49:01 AM
Good night.


Goodnight Kermit!God Bless!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:56:01 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/ScreenShot003a.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 02:56:46 AM


Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:08:34 AM


Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight TM!I was off swingin through the cage...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:12:02 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/ScreenShot003a.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!




                          JORAN,PAULUS,DEEPAK,SATISH,AS WELL AS ARUBA

                           YOU WILL NOT FORGET THE EVIL YOU HAVE DONE...

                                           JUSTICE WILL BE SERVED


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:31:41 AM
Good morning, Monkeys! One more troubling aspect to Caps' "cut into pieces" theory: When you hide a body in 3-4 different places , you increase the liklihood that it would be found by 3-4 fold!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 21, 2009, 09:50:16 AM
Good morning wreck, well that's a fun fact I never knew before  ::MonkeyShocked::

I wanted to drop a note here for caesu, I used to tangle with them on the poli thread at times so I felt it fitting to post to caesu here, that I really do appreciate all they contribute on this thread. Olive branch extended with a smile ............

I hope all have a good day, going to try to sneak a shower in before another work call.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 09:53:55 AM
Good morning, Monkeys! One more troubling aspect to Caps' "cut into pieces" theory: When you hide a body in 3-4 different places , you increase the liklihood that it would be found by 3-4 fold!

Good morning wreck!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 09:56:07 AM

Good morning Magnolia!   ::MonkeyCool::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 10:22:23 AM
GOOD MORNING ALL!!

Janet
7:25 AM PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 10:36:11 AM
GOOD MORNING ALL!!

Janet
7:25 AM PM

Good morning Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 10:59:49 AM
Well ... early this morning (4:00 am) some loud moments ... crashing sounds ... downstairs from my youngest son's former room.  I was petrified so ... I woke my husband.  He listened for about two minutes before getting up the nerve to go down and check.  He claimed he was assessing the situation but ... I could tell he was somewhat scared too.  PRIDE!!

Anyways ... after a couple of minutes hubby called and told me to bring one of of his smaller fishing nets.  A bat had fallen down the chimney into the fireplace and was ... flying all over the room in a panic.

At the moment the creepy little creature is lying in the grass in the backyard.  I do not think it will survive the ordeal.

Hubby's project for the day.  Building a screen to block that fireplace openting.

Well ... long story short ... I could not get back to sleep and ... I do believe I am headed back to bed now to catch some shut eye.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 21, 2009, 11:21:55 AM
Well ... early this morning (4:00 am) some loud moments ... crashing sounds ... downstairs from my youngest son's former room.  I was petrified so ... I woke my husband.  He listened for about two minutes before getting up the nerve to go down and check.  He claimed he was assessing the situation but ... I could tell he was somewhat scared too.  PRIDE!!

Anyways ... after a couple of minutes hubby called and told me to bring one of of his smaller fishing nets.  A bat had fallen down the chimney into the fireplace and was ... flying all over the room in a panic.

At the moment the creepy little creature is lying in the grass in the backyard.  I do not think it will survive the ordeal.

Hubby's project for the day.  Building a screen to block that fireplace openting.

Well ... long story short ... I could not get back to sleep and ... I do believe I am headed back to bed now to catch some shut eye.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT

I would have been petrified too  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 11:30:07 AM
Well ... early this morning (4:00 am) some loud moments ... crashing sounds ... downstairs from my youngest son's former room.  I was petrified so ... I woke my husband.  He listened for about two minutes before getting up the nerve to go down and check.  He claimed he was assessing the situation but ... I could tell he was somewhat scared too.  PRIDE!!

Anyways ... after a couple of minutes hubby called and told me to bring one of of his smaller fishing nets.  A bat had fallen down the chimney into the fireplace and was ... flying all over the room in a panic.

At the moment the creepy little creature is lying in the grass in the backyard.  I do not think it will survive the ordeal.

Hubby's project for the day.  Building a screen to block that fireplace openting.

Well ... long story short ... I could not get back to sleep and ... I do believe I am headed back to bed now to catch some shut eye.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT
Holy cow! Sounds like a job for Batman!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 11:40:21 AM


Good Morning, Monkeys!

I've been in the old threads from a year ago, 2-26-08 to 3-02-08.  It's heartbreaking to read back through, really.

But, I need some help this morning...here's a quote from Silvetti posted at BFN:  "Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments." (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989)

I've not yet found any "official" explanation as to why the initial survey grid was tripled

Can anyone help me out with this?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 12:32:50 PM
Well ... early this morning (4:00 am) some loud moments ... crashing sounds ... downstairs from my youngest son's former room.  I was petrified so ... I woke my husband.  He listened for about two minutes before getting up the nerve to go down and check.  He claimed he was assessing the situation but ... I could tell he was somewhat scared too.  PRIDE!!

Anyways ... after a couple of minutes hubby called and told me to bring one of of his smaller fishing nets.  A bat had fallen down the chimney into the fireplace and was ... flying all over the room in a panic.

At the moment the creepy little creature is lying in the grass in the backyard.  I do not think it will survive the ordeal.

Hubby's project for the day.  Building a screen to block that fireplace openting.

Well ... long story short ... I could not get back to sleep and ... I do believe I am headed back to bed now to catch some shut eye.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Wow, what a night!

See you later Janet, I hope you can get some rest.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 12:37:31 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 12:39:02 PM


Good Morning, Monkeys!

I've been in the old threads from a year ago, 2-26-08 to 3-02-08.  It's heartbreaking to read back through, really.

But, I need some help this morning...here's a quote from Silvetti posted at BFN:  "Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments." (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989)

I've not yet found any "official" explanation as to why the initial survey grid was tripled

Can anyone help me out with this?


Wasn't there something about a statement from Deepak....and then John Silvetti and "Captain Jim Graves" went out in the dinghy to determine how far out they might have gone...?

I may have it confused.  I've been trying to look for information, but I'm backing up right now so everything is at a snail's pace.  I'm going to be out for a while, if no ones posted anything to help; I'll look more when I get back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 12:39:20 PM
Good Morning Monkeys!Great question LifeSong.What a night Janet! ::MonkeyEek:: Daughter had friend over so breakfast out is where it's at.As the voice of reason would say.BBL to do some searchin!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 12:41:45 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey, baaad is o.k.!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 12:42:57 PM
Keepthefaith ... you were missing in action last night.  Big date with your sweetie?

Next weekend hubby and I are headed down your way with three other couples from our church to see the Lion King production.  One couple is in charge of all the arrangements.  Although ... I do not know all the details ... I am excited already.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet
9:40 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 21, 2009, 12:57:31 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey, baaad is o.k.!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Janet pushing ????????

First spitting and now this??????????   ::MonkeyShocked::



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I love it ! too cute Janet, you are too cute !



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 01:03:39 PM

Wasn't there something about a statement from Deepak....and then John Silvetti and "Captain Jim Graves" went out in the dinghy to determine how far out they might have gone...?

I may have it confused.  I've been trying to look for information, but I'm backing up right now so everything is at a snail's pace.  I'm going to be out for a while, if no ones posted anything to help; I'll look more when I get back.

texasmom ... is the following what you are thinking about.  Nothing about Deepak but ...

Janet

++++++

XIV. The Search Area
Fri 25-Jan 0950 hrs

Special Notice:
By John Silvetti-


The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.

Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area. This information in combination with the weather patterns observed by the survey team since our arrival on December 15th left only one boundary to define. The team needed to observe the island from offshore on a small vessel at night to determine this boundary. Sounds easy….huh?

After 2 unsuccessful attempts using a local vessel due to fuel and mechanical problems, the decision was made to utilize the R/V Persistence’s Rescue Boat, the “Avon”. The Avon is a 16’ center console inflatable vessel powered by a 70 hp Daihatsu engine. Prior to dark, the Avon was launched from the Persistence and piloted to the Holiday Inn Pier by Captain Jim Graves. Later that evening, John Silvetti boarded the vessel with Capt. Graves, transited to the start point, and commenced an offshore run documenting the time and vessel position with a WAAS enabled hand-held GPS system. At one mile out, radio communications were confirmed with the Persistence. At six miles out, radio communications were again confirmed along with spot light identification as the Avon crossed astern of the Persistence. It was somewhere shortly after this point that Murphy boarded the Avon!

The weather was very similar to the recorded weather of late May, 2005. The seas were running 4-6’ with swells of 6-8’. It was rough for an Avon! Upon reaching the final destination point while documenting the final position, the engine sputtered and stalled. It never started again! Approximately 30 minutes of effort to restart the engine was fruitless. I believe that is when we noticed that we were taking on water! HELLO HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM!

As we watched Aruba disappear over the horizon, contemplating our broken engine, a vessel taking on water and the fact that we are about to enact the emergency contingencies of our procedures, Capt. Graves stated, “ I am sure glad that it is so dark!” I took the bait. Why? Because I believe we would be scared to death if we could see how big these waves are! Persistence…Persistence….this is Avon on channel 16 ..over! Silence. Persistence…Persistence….this is Avon on channel 16 ..over! Five minutes of silence. Back up frequency. Persistence…Persistence….this is Avon on channel 09 ..over! Five minutes of silence. VHF comms failure. Ya gotta love Murphy.

Thanks to the support of Coast Guard Curacao, Aruban Port Authority and some unbelievable cell phone coverage, the Persistence plucked us out of the water approximately 16 miles offshore Aruba. We had acquired a tremendous amount of information to determine the last boundary and learned a few lessons:

1) Never use your lower back to absorb the shock of pounding seas when you are fat and out of shape.
2) Never get fat and out of shape.
3) No matter how complete and thorough your safety procedures are, never count Murphy out!

-John Silvetti

http://www.nholloway.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 01:09:03 PM
Well ... early this morning (4:00 am) some loud moments ... crashing sounds ... downstairs from my youngest son's former room.  I was petrified so ... I woke my husband.  He listened for about two minutes before getting up the nerve to go down and check.  He claimed he was assessing the situation but ... I could tell he was somewhat scared too.  PRIDE!!

Anyways ... after a couple of minutes hubby called and told me to bring one of of his smaller fishing nets.  A bat had fallen down the chimney into the fireplace and was ... flying all over the room in a panic.

At the moment the creepy little creature is lying in the grass in the backyard.  I do not think it will survive the ordeal.

Hubby's project for the day.  Building a screen to block that fireplace openting.

Well ... long story short ... I could not get back to sleep and ... I do believe I am headed back to bed now to catch some shut eye.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT

Janet, burn a little damp pine straw in the fireplace.  The smell of fresh smoke will keep
the bats away.  This is the time of year that they look for a place to come in.
The house that I just moved from was brick with six chimneys and nearly 100 yrs old.
They can get in through the tinyest of places...even where just a little morter is missing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 01:09:30 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey, baaad is o.k.!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Janet pushing ????????

First spitting and now this??????????   ::MonkeyShocked::



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I love it ! too cute Janet, you are too cute !



Believe me ... there is nothing cute about a 62 year old granny walking across the back property at 4:00 AM in the morning in boots and her flannel nighty to an out building that contains about a zillion fish nets.  I was thinking some very unChristian thoughts as I was attempting to determine what was a "small" net.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 21, 2009, 01:12:01 PM


(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/morta.jpg)

http://awemainta.com/home/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 01:44:10 PM

Wasn't there something about a statement from Deepak....and then John Silvetti and "Captain Jim Graves" went out in the dinghy to determine how far out they might have gone...?

I may have it confused.  I've been trying to look for information, but I'm backing up right now so everything is at a snail's pace.  I'm going to be out for a while, if no ones posted anything to help; I'll look more when I get back.

texasmom ... is the following what you are thinking about.  Nothing about Deepak but ...

Janet

++++++

XIV. The Search Area
Fri 25-Jan 0950 hrs

Special Notice:
By John Silvetti-


The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.

Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area. This information in combination with the weather patterns observed by the survey team since our arrival on December 15th left only one boundary to define. The team needed to observe the island from offshore on a small vessel at night to determine this boundary. Sounds easy….huh?

After 2 unsuccessful attempts using a local vessel due to fuel and mechanical problems, the decision was made to utilize the R/V Persistence’s Rescue Boat, the “Avon”. The Avon is a 16’ center console inflatable vessel powered by a 70 hp Daihatsu engine. Prior to dark, the Avon was launched from the Persistence and piloted to the Holiday Inn Pier by Captain Jim Graves. Later that evening, John Silvetti boarded the vessel with Capt. Graves, transited to the start point, and commenced an offshore run documenting the time and vessel position with a WAAS enabled hand-held GPS system. At one mile out, radio communications were confirmed with the Persistence. At six miles out, radio communications were again confirmed along with spot light identification as the Avon crossed astern of the Persistence. It was somewhere shortly after this point that Murphy boarded the Avon!

The weather was very similar to the recorded weather of late May, 2005. The seas were running 4-6’ with swells of 6-8’. It was rough for an Avon! Upon reaching the final destination point while documenting the final position, the engine sputtered and stalled. It never started again! Approximately 30 minutes of effort to restart the engine was fruitless. I believe that is when we noticed that we were taking on water! HELLO HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM!

As we watched Aruba disappear over the horizon, contemplating our broken engine, a vessel taking on water and the fact that we are about to enact the emergency contingencies of our procedures, Capt. Graves stated, “ I am sure glad that it is so dark!” I took the bait. Why? Because I believe we would be scared to death if we could see how big these waves are! Persistence…Persistence….this is Avon on channel 16 ..over! Silence. Persistence…Persistence….this is Avon on channel 16 ..over! Five minutes of silence. Back up frequency. Persistence…Persistence….this is Avon on channel 09 ..over! Five minutes of silence. VHF comms failure. Ya gotta love Murphy.

Thanks to the support of Coast Guard Curacao, Aruban Port Authority and some unbelievable cell phone coverage, the Persistence plucked us out of the water approximately 16 miles offshore Aruba. We had acquired a tremendous amount of information to determine the last boundary and learned a few lessons:

1) Never use your lower back to absorb the shock of pounding seas when you are fat and out of shape.
2) Never get fat and out of shape.
3) No matter how complete and thorough your safety procedures are, never count Murphy out!

-John Silvetti

http://www.nholloway.blogspot.com/

Thanks so much, Janet.  I do remember this now.  And it has HINKY written all over it, imo.

They start out with a defined search area/grid based upon numerous credible sources.  They survey the whole thing, but do not dive on all the targets.

Then, based on one piece of information ("a reported confession...with some credence"), they expand the search area/grid by 200% with evidently no thought of the add'l costs this will entail.

Logic dictates that all of targets in the original grid should be checked before venturing into the new, expanded area.  Especially considering that any reported confession from any of these suspects would be riddled with more lies.

Furthermore, I need to double-check this, but I believe the only confession around at this time was Joran's to Patrick re: "Daury".  There was no information there specifying where in the ocean "Daury" went - Joran said he wasn't there and didn't know.

I suspect the expanded search area (late January) was a result of a "deal" struck with Schaefer/Silvetti to map the ocean floor, in exchange for giving ALE sole access to the evidence in the cage (early January).

And...I still hope I'm wrong.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 21, 2009, 01:45:45 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey, baaad is o.k.!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Janet pushing ????????

First spitting and now this??????????   ::MonkeyShocked::



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I love it ! too cute Janet, you are too cute !



Believe me ... there is nothing cute about a 62 year old granny walking across the back property at 4:00 AM in the morning in boots and her flannel nighty to an out building that contains about a zillion fish nets.  I was thinking some very unChristian thoughts as I was attempting to determine what was a "small" net.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

Yes it is cute, very cute. Cute as me filling my bird feeder last night in my jammies which consisted of my thermal bootie slippers from restoration hardware, Rick's thermal shirt (which I often sleep in), and my velour warm up suit pants. It's chilly for the south this weekend and I gave up on glitz and glamour long ago! Luckily I have wonderful neighbors who forgive my bedhead when I take the doggie out at 5am in the morning too  ::MonkeyHaHa::

next time I want a photo ! YOU ARE TOO CUTE !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: oldiebutgoodie on February 21, 2009, 01:55:31 PM
Well ... early this morning (4:00 am) some loud moments ... crashing sounds ... downstairs from my youngest son's former room.  I was petrified so ... I woke my husband.  He listened for about two minutes before getting up the nerve to go down and check.  He claimed he was assessing the situation but ... I could tell he was somewhat scared too.  PRIDE!!

Anyways ... after a couple of minutes hubby called and told me to bring one of of his smaller fishing nets.  A bat had fallen down the chimney into the fireplace and was ... flying all over the room in a panic.

At the moment the creepy little creature is lying in the grass in the backyard.  I do not think it will survive the ordeal.

Hubby's project for the day.  Building a screen to block that fireplace openting.

Well ... long story short ... I could not get back to sleep and ... I do believe I am headed back to bed now to catch some shut eye.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT

The bats in my area all have rabies. At least, the ones that can be captured. And the fleas on the squirrels around here carry plague (that's been confirmed by the Health Dept.). I worked at a Denny's restaurant that was surrounded on three sides by a grassy weedy hilly area and we had a squirrel and coyote problem. The coyotes were so aggressive that one of our big strong employees would escort customers at night to their cars if they were parked on the edge of the lot adjacent to the field. Coyotes are supposed to be afraid of people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 02:10:39 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey, baaad is o.k.!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Janet pushing ????????

First spitting and now this??????????   ::MonkeyShocked::



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I love it ! too cute Janet, you are too cute !



Believe me ... there is nothing cute about a 62 year old granny walking across the back property at 4:00 AM in the morning in boots and her flannel nighty to an out building that contains about a zillion fish nets.  I was thinking some very unChristian thoughts as I was attempting to determine what was a "small" net.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

Yes it is cute, very cute. Cute as me filling my bird feeder last night in my jammies which consisted of my thermal bootie slippers from restoration hardware, Rick's thermal shirt (which I often sleep in), and my velour warm up suit pants. It's chilly for the south this weekend and I gave up on glitz and glamour long ago! Luckily I have wonderful neighbors who forgive my bedhead when I take the doggie out at 5am in the morning too  ::MonkeyHaHa::

next time I want a photo ! YOU ARE TOO CUTE !


We live on property so ... fortunately the back of our yard is not visible to any of the neighbours.

Rick's shirt ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I realize that hubby and I are getting on in years and ... when I attempt to comprehend life without him ... I just cannot go there.  I have a great relationship with all three of my grown kids but ... when all is said and done ... they all have their own lives and ... that is the way it should be.

None ... my heart breaks for you and ... it breaks for Peaches' hubby.  Sometimes ... life just does not seem fair.  I wish I understood the ways of our absolute God.  However ... if we mortals understood the ways of God ... He would not be God.  Does that make sense?  I realized that trust in the ways of our Heavenly Father is where it is at ... trust that He knows what is best for His precious children.

Hugs

Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:11:25 PM
Keepthefaith ... you were missing in action last night.  Big date with your sweetie?

Next weekend hubby and I are headed down your way with three other couples from our church to see the Lion King production.  One couple is in charge of all the arrangements.  Although ... I do not know all the details ... I am excited already.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet
9:40 AM PT

I was around Janet.Closed the store down last night then jumped on late at night!Lion King.Must be at the Paramount!My mother's favorite show is "The Jersey Boy's".The one about Frankie Vallie.She's seen it many times and even threatens my dad to take her to Vegas to see it!Should be wonderful.We were going to see Mempis with the parents but something came up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 02:15:55 PM
While eldest grandsons have just arrived for an afternoon at Mama and Papas.

They have been afforded two hours by their parents to play computer games.    Considering we only have two computers ... mine and youngest son's old one ... I will have to forfeit mine.

Later, Janet

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:16:55 PM
While eldest grandsons have just arrived for an afternoon at Mama and Papas.

They have been afforded two hours by their parents to play computer games.    Considering we only have two computers ... mine and youngest son's old one ... I will have to forfeit mine.

Later, Janet

 

Good Day Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:31:26 PM


Good Morning, Monkeys!

I've been in the old threads from a year ago, 2-26-08 to 3-02-08.  It's heartbreaking to read back through, really.

But, I need some help this morning...here's a quote from Silvetti posted at BFN:  "Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments." (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989)

I've not yet found any "official" explanation as to why the initial survey grid was tripled

Can anyone help me out with this?


http://nholloway.blogspot.com/
 
XIV. The Search Area
#64 on: Today at 10:40:21 AM   lifesong  page 4
I've not yet found any "official" explanation as to why the initial survey grid was tripled.



Fri 25-Jan 1630 hrs
Special Notice:
By John Silvetti-
The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.

Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area. This information in combination with the weather patterns observed by the survey team since our arrival on December 15th left only one boundary to define. The team needed to observe the island from offshore on a small vessel at night to determine this boundary. Sounds easy….huh?
 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 21, 2009, 02:33:18 PM
I tried to sleep but ... sleep would not come.  Hubby was sawing logs which made me kindda jealous sooo .... prior to getting up again ... I gave him a shove and then ... pretended to be sleeping.  Now we are both up.  Fair is fair.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I am baaaad.  Sooo baaaad.

Anyways ... I think I will do a clean sweep of that violated room today.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey, baaad is o.k.!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Janet pushing ????????

First spitting and now this??????????   ::MonkeyShocked::



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I love it ! too cute Janet, you are too cute !



Believe me ... there is nothing cute about a 62 year old granny walking across the back property at 4:00 AM in the morning in boots and her flannel nighty to an out building that contains about a zillion fish nets.  I was thinking some very unChristian thoughts as I was attempting to determine what was a "small" net.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

Yes it is cute, very cute. Cute as me filling my bird feeder last night in my jammies which consisted of my thermal bootie slippers from restoration hardware, Rick's thermal shirt (which I often sleep in), and my velour warm up suit pants. It's chilly for the south this weekend and I gave up on glitz and glamour long ago! Luckily I have wonderful neighbors who forgive my bedhead when I take the doggie out at 5am in the morning too  ::MonkeyHaHa::

next time I want a photo ! YOU ARE TOO CUTE !


We live on property so ... fortunately the back of our yard is not visible to any of the neighbours.

Rick's shirt ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I realize that hubby and I are getting on in years and ... when I attempt to comprehend life without him ... I just cannot go there.  I have a great relationship with all three of my grown kids but ... when all is said and done ... they all have their own lives and ... that is the way it should be.

None ... my heart breaks for you and ... it breaks for Peaches' hubby.  Sometimes ... life just does not seem fair.  I wish I understood the ways of our absolute God.  However ... if we mortals understood the ways of God ... He would not be God.  Does that make sense?  I realized that trust in the ways of our Heavenly Father is where it is at ... trust that He knows what is best for His precious children.

Hugs

Janet.

forgive my quote stacking and my robo posting this week  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet. I really do adore you.

Please know I finally realized my lesson, it's that to find that safe harbor with another person who loves you in spite of all of your shortcomings, is the gift that you never lose. It is also a gift that some never find so I am lucky in that regard. I see his touch in my children everyday.

Someone who used to post here, that I didn't always agree with but eventually we learned to move beyond that, reminded me of that lesson today. She sometimes reads her so I hope she will read that I am grateful for her friendship and support just as I am for yours.

I thought I'd share too that I had occasion to be in Natalee's hometown last fall for one of son's games. When he did play for Bama I used to struggle sitting in the stadium when the dance team would take the field, for Natalee was always there in my mind's eye. This last game he wasn't suited up for Bama but another team, but I still remembered her the entire time I was there vividly in my heart.

Look at the ties she's woven through all of our lives? I somehow truly believe she would smile to know that.

God bless Natalee



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:38:50 PM
903 on: Today at 08:56:28 PM  SAN  pg 46
Why would they want to not question this persons motives.  They came on with both guns drawn and refused to answer certain questions. Why?  Why are they covering for these people all of a sudden.  Is someone related to one of these individuals that we don't know of
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.900
 
 #904 on: Today at 08:59:53 PM   ktf
In my personal opinion.Some of these posters are either related or work for these people
 

----------------------------------
POSTER related or work for these people?

Smith, Halliburton, and Hughes are top oil drilling companies in the US.  I know this for sure because of personal experience.      Cheyney = Halliburton   Did our VP pop into Aruba to discuss some geological surveys before TES left?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4101.msg545029#msg545029
 

November 06, 2008, 10:08:08 PM 
Thirty-two years ago, I lived In Isfahan, Iran for two years[/b].  The left hand was used for toilet functions because their bathroom facilities are very different than ours are.  They don't use toilet paper
//http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3697.msg527697#msg527697
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3697.msg527697#msg527697
 

Think about it IRAN = BIG OIL

Iran is set to sell stakes in Isfahan and Trabiz refineries,

LOOK at the second paragraph where Iran is going to privatize 45 companies.
 IT's all about OIL companies in Iran.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=36256518

Now look at this:
These pensions, which include New York City’s five main funds and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, hold $3.7 billion worth of shares in energy companies involved in Iran, out of a total $570 billion in assets.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/25/business/worldbusiness/25fund.html


WHERE IS ISFAHAN:
Isfahan or Esfahan (historically also rendered as Ispahan, Old Persian Aspadana, Middle Persian Spahan, Persian اصفهان) located about 340 km south of Tehran is Iran (Persia)'s third largest city. Isfahan has been designated by UNESCO as a world heritage city. It contains a wide variety of Islamic Architectural sites ranging from the 11th century to the 19th.

Congressman Sherman Says Iran More Likely to Nuke Isfahan than Israel
http://www.niacouncil.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=480&Itemid=2

IRAN SIGNS GAS DEAL WITH HALLIBURTON SUBSIDIARY. U.S. oil-services company Halliburton has won a tender to drill in two phases of the South Pars gas field, Iranian state television reported on 9 January. "Some American officials have shares in Halliburton," state television added, without providing any names.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2005/3-170105.htm
-----------------------------------------------



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:42:59 PM
903 on: Today at 08:56:28 PM  SAN  pg 46
Why would they want to not question this persons motives.  They came on with both guns drawn and refused to answer certain questions. Why?  Why are they covering for these people all of a sudden.  Is someone related to one of these individuals that we don't know of
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.900
 
 #904 on: Today at 08:59:53 PM   ktf
In my personal opinion.Some of these posters are either related or work for these people
 

----------------------------------
POSTER related or work for these people?

Smith, Halliburton, and Hughes are top oil drilling companies in the US.  I know this for sure because of personal experience.      Cheyney = Halliburton   Did our VP pop into Aruba to discuss some geological surveys before TES left?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4101.msg545029#msg545029
 

November 06, 2008, 10:08:08 PM 
Thirty-two years ago, I lived In Isfahan, Iran for two years[/b].  The left hand was used for toilet functions because their bathroom facilities are very different than ours are.  They don't use toilet paper
//http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3697.msg527697#msg527697
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3697.msg527697#msg527697
 

Think about it IRAN = BIG OIL

Iran is set to sell stakes in Isfahan and Trabiz refineries,

LOOK at the second paragraph where Iran is going to privatize 45 companies.
 IT's all about OIL companies in Iran.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=36256518

Now look at this:
These pensions, which include New York City’s five main funds and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, hold $3.7 billion worth of shares in energy companies involved in Iran, out of a total $570 billion in assets.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/25/business/worldbusiness/25fund.html


WHERE IS ISFAHAN:
Isfahan or Esfahan (historically also rendered as Ispahan, Old Persian Aspadana, Middle Persian Spahan, Persian اصفهان) located about 340 km south of Tehran is Iran (Persia)'s third largest city. Isfahan has been designated by UNESCO as a world heritage city. It contains a wide variety of Islamic Architectural sites ranging from the 11th century to the 19th.

Congressman Sherman Says Iran More Likely to Nuke Isfahan than Israel
http://www.niacouncil.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=480&Itemid=2

IRAN SIGNS GAS DEAL WITH HALLIBURTON SUBSIDIARY. U.S. oil-services company Halliburton has won a tender to drill in two phases of the South Pars gas field, Iranian state television reported on 9 January. "Some American officials have shares in Halliburton," state television added, without providing any names.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2005/3-170105.htm
-----------------------------------------------



VERY INTERESTING...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:47:16 PM
I'm still just as perplexed today!If True.Whom is Paulus,as well as Antonio Carlo doing contracts for as well as laundering money!With common sense and logic it would have been so simple to give NATALEE HOLLOWAY JUSTICE.Why compound the problem if Paulus isn't one of the Perps??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 02:49:30 PM
Good morning, Monkeys! One more troubling aspect to Caps' "cut into pieces" theory: When you hide a body in 3-4 different places , you increase the liklihood that it would be found by 3-4 fold!

Caps that he was able to pin-point the possible location where Joran could have lost a shoe and also how far it is from the Whitehouse apartment, how far it is from his house if he needed to walk back and also keeping an eye on the time it took to do all this.

BUT I thought he said he got his information from his WITNESS friend that said he saw Joran without a shoe. This was before the witness was mentioned.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 02:50:01 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 02:51:39 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::


(that was in reference to Kermit's and KTF's posts above)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:52:40 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

I think anybody is fair game in this Tragedy.It is interesting that some have disappeared for the moment! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 02:54:08 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

I think anybody is fair game in this Tragedy.It is interesting that some have disappeared for the moment! ::MonkeyCool::
I was looking at said poster's nickname and possible initials.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:57:02 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

I think anybody is fair game in this Tragedy.It is interesting that some have disappeared for the moment! ::MonkeyCool::
I was looking at said poster's nickname and possible initials.

In reference to Iran?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 02:58:01 PM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 02:59:18 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

I think anybody is fair game in this Tragedy.It is interesting that some have disappeared for the moment! ::MonkeyCool::
I was looking at said poster's nickname and possible initials.

In reference to Iran?

Quote
POSTER related or work for these people?

Smith, Halliburton, and Hughes are top oil drilling companies in the US.  I know this for sure because of personal experience.      Cheyney = Halliburton   Did our VP pop into Aruba to discuss some geological surveys before TES left?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4101.msg545029#msg545029


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:02:17 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

I think anybody is fair game in this Tragedy.It is interesting that some have disappeared for the moment! ::MonkeyCool::
I was looking at said poster's nickname and possible initials.

In reference to Iran?

Quote
POSTER related or work for these people?

Smith, Halliburton, and Hughes are top oil drilling companies in the US.  I know this for sure because of personal experience.      Cheyney = Halliburton   Did our VP pop into Aruba to discuss some geological surveys before TES left?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4101.msg545029#msg545029

I'm with ya Wreck!Said poster was working very hard to get to know Kermit,as well as whom Kermit knew.IIRC.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 03:04:49 PM
I find the SS references interesting.  Didn't she start posting here about the same
time as Caps?

She said that she never believed that it was Natalee in the cage/trap,
but she did.....on the same page as CBB's enhancement of the skull and tennis shoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:05:18 PM
I was apart of one conversation regarding that being Air Force 2.Some where so admant against it.IIRC.Forget who they were.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 03:06:19 PM
I find the SS references interesting.  Didn't she start posting here about the same
time as Caps?

She said that she never believed that it was Natalee in the cage/trap,
but she did.....on the same page as CBB's enhancement of the skull and tennis shoe.
you can click on a poster's name and see their "join date".  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:07:11 PM
What do you think Johan555 and Bastibro? ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 03:07:48 PM
I was apart of one conversation regarding that being Air Force 2.Some where so admant against it.IIRC.Forget who they were.
I was one of those against it. I do not believe it was Cheney. I think it was State Department officials monitoring Chavez.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 03:08:05 PM
I'm still just as perplexed today!If True.Whom is Paulus,as well as Antonio Carlo doing contracts for as well as laundering money!With common sense and logic it would have been so simple to give NATALEE HOLLOWAY JUSTICE.Why compound the problem if Paulus isn't one of the Perps??

If you wanted to expand your business/company and say you also want to lessen or eliminate your taxes which would increase your profits, yes? Perhaps a person tells you I know someone, call this guy. You make the call one day and this guy in Aruba says, For a price, we can set up your business here. Afterall, look at how many of those businesses are out of apts in Aruba and they sell their art or whatever on the fly to tourists, right? So the magic would is "How much will it cost me?" Maybe the Aruba contract man that is setting it all up says a flat rate or maybe he takes a percentage of your business. Either way, you're in.
You've got profits, you don't pay taxes, but you pay a price for setting up this business. Now, lets say, someone comes along and wants to question your taxes. You are not going to tell anyone how you set this all up because you knew it was illegal. You make a quick call to your contact in Aruba, he covers your buttinsky. You are now invovled in the web. And you are also involved in the washing machine of money laundering.

Joe Blow and his wife Nancy are on a cruise, they arrive at the stop off of Aruba, they like to blow some money in the casinos cuz Joe Blow is a big whale. He and his wife win money, lots of it, and they take that money and go to the bank to exchange the florins for Francs since they will be returning to their country. The bank takes the florins and gives them Francs, yes! That money is now taken off to another country and deposited back in Joe and Nancy Blows bank account in another country. It smells dirty, but it's not traced.

You on the other hand have money coming in and so you make a deposit where? Not back in the States, but in an account you set up in Aruba. The money might be drug money from someone that purchased a large item from your store. YOU deposited in the Aruba bank. That bank has it's own network with gov't people on the boards of directors so it has control over the bank. It also has as attorney's Antonio Carlos. The money is washed through the bank that is owned by mafia and controlled by gov't people, hoteliers etc.

Is tourism their number one thing in Aruba? Yep, they help wash money.
And they helped your business venture in Aruba and that helps you not pay high taxes which gives you more profits and you were never the wiser. Do they love American businessmen? Sure. Ask Silvetti, he wanted to set up an office there so he could do business with South America. Could be innocent venture. After mapping for oil. I don't know. What do you think?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:09:20 PM
I was apart of one conversation regarding that being Air Force 2.Some where so admant against it.IIRC.Forget who they were.
I was one of those against it. I do not believe it was Cheney. I think it was State Department officials monitoring Chavez.

I don't think it was necessarily Cheney.As the Persistence endeavor Wreck.Could this trip be two-fold?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 03:12:40 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes it is. And they were so knowledgeable about Shango that they jumped right in to, ya know, help solve the riddle.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 03:13:54 PM
I was apart of one conversation regarding that being Air Force 2.Some where so admant against it.IIRC.Forget who they were.
I was one of those against it. I do not believe it was Cheney. I think it was State Department officials monitoring Chavez.

I don't think it was necessarily Cheney.As the Persistence endeavor Wreck.Could this trip be two-fold?
Meaning the Persistence was working for our CIA/State Department??? That is another whole can of worms -- I cannot fathom. (  ::MonkeyShocked::SURELY NOT!!!!!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 03:14:14 PM
I find the SS references interesting.  Didn't she start posting here about the same
time as Caps?

She said that she never believed that it was Natalee in the cage/trap,
but she did.....on the same page as CBB's enhancement of the skull and tennis shoe.
you can click on a poster's name and see their "join date".  ::MonkeyWink::

SS       Scared Monkey    joined 2008-03-02     post 3214   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 03:16:29 PM
While eldest grandsons have just arrived for an afternoon at Mama and Papas.

They have been afforded two hours by their parents to play computer games.    Considering we only have two computers ... mine and youngest son's old one ... I will have to forfeit mine.

Later, Janet

 

Darn, and Miss Piggy made you shoe-fly pie today.
She thought you deserved it for your well written responses yesterday.
She just loves to read your posts. She said, it's like reading Dear Abby. She should work for a major newspaper, so everyone could enjoy her insights and family stories. She thinks highly of you Ms. Janet.
And so do I.

Have a wonderful day, bat and all.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:17:55 PM
I was apart of one conversation regarding that being Air Force 2.Some where so admant against it.IIRC.Forget who they were.
I was one of those against it. I do not believe it was Cheney. I think it was State Department officials monitoring Chavez.

I don't think it was necessarily Cheney.As the Persistence endeavor Wreck.Could this trip be two-fold?
Meaning the Persistence was working for our CIA/State Department??? That is another whole can of worms -- I cannot fathom. (  ::MonkeyShocked::SURELY NOT!!!!!)

I was referencing Air Force 2.They could have monitored Chavez,as well as have an intermediary to talk with the Persistence regarding business?Just a thought.Throw nanner's if necessary.I am quick though. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:19:31 PM
What do you think Johan555 and Bastibro? ::MonkeyWink::

Any ideas guys? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 21, 2009, 03:22:09 PM
What do you think Johan555 and Bastibro? ::MonkeyWink::

Huh sorry, i wasn`t paying attention ::MonkeyWink::
Think about what?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:23:42 PM
What do you think Johan555 and Bastibro? ::MonkeyWink::

Huh sorry, i wasn`t paying attention ::MonkeyWink::
Think about what?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 03:25:21 PM
I'm still just as perplexed today!If True.Whom is Paulus,as well as Antonio Carlo doing contracts for as well as laundering money!With common sense and logic it would have been so simple to give NATALEE HOLLOWAY JUSTICE.Why compound the problem if Paulus isn't one of the Perps??

If you wanted to expand your business/company and say you also want to lessen or eliminate your taxes which would increase your profits, yes? Perhaps a person tells you I know someone, call this guy. You make the call one day and this guy in Aruba says, For a price, we can set up your business here. Afterall, look at how many of those businesses are out of apts in Aruba and they sell their art or whatever on the fly to tourists, right? So the magic would is "How much will it cost me?" Maybe the Aruba contract man that is setting it all up says a flat rate or maybe he takes a percentage of your business. Either way, you're in.
You've got profits, you don't pay taxes, but you pay a price for setting up this business. Now, lets say, someone comes along and wants to question your taxes. You are not going to tell anyone how you set this all up because you knew it was illegal. You make a quick call to your contact in Aruba, he covers your buttinsky. You are now invovled in the web. And you are also involved in the washing machine of money laundering.

Joe Blow and his wife Nancy are on a cruise, they arrive at the stop off of Aruba, they like to blow some money in the casinos cuz Joe Blow is a big whale. He and his wife win money, lots of it, and they take that money and go to the bank to exchange the florins for Francs since they will be returning to their country. The bank takes the florins and gives them Francs, yes! That money is now taken off to another country and deposited back in Joe and Nancy Blows bank account in another country. It smells dirty, but it's not traced.

You on the other hand have money coming in and so you make a deposit where? Not back in the States, but in an account you set up in Aruba. The money might be drug money from someone that purchased a large item from your store. YOU deposited in the Aruba bank. That bank has it's own network with gov't people on the boards of directors so it has control over the bank. It also has as attorney's Antonio Carlos. The money is washed through the bank that is owned by mafia and controlled by gov't people, hoteliers etc.

Is tourism their number one thing in Aruba? Yep, they help wash money.
And they helped your business venture in Aruba and that helps you not pay high taxes which gives you more profits and you were never the wiser. Do they love American businessmen? Sure. Ask Silvetti, he wanted to set up an office there so he could do business with South America. Could be innocent venture. After mapping for oil. I don't know. What do you think?





Joe Blow doesn't sound like a French name.   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 03:26:35 PM
ktf,

Kermit.Is this the boat that they leased back?
http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html

I think the boat you are thinking of was the one that Superior Offshore sold and then leased back with Hornbeck?
and the boats here are the ones that were part of the fishing fleet that he bought
 
Published January 4, 2008
FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.
Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.
The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 03:28:00 PM
Interesting to note when some posters first started posting at SM.  ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes it is. And they were so knowledgeable about Shango that they jumped right in to, ya know, help solve the riddle.




IMO they weren't so knowledgeable about Shango......they just used the riddle to get
their points across.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 21, 2009, 03:28:07 PM
I'm still just as perplexed today!If True.Whom is Paulus,as well as Antonio Carlo doing contracts for as well as laundering money!With common sense and logic it would have been so simple to give NATALEE HOLLOWAY JUSTICE.Why compound the problem if Paulus isn't one of the Perps??

If you wanted to expand your business/company and say you also want to lessen or eliminate your taxes which would increase your profits, yes? Perhaps a person tells you I know someone, call this guy. You make the call one day and this guy in Aruba says, For a price, we can set up your business here. Afterall, look at how many of those businesses are out of apts in Aruba and they sell their art or whatever on the fly to tourists, right? So the magic would is "How much will it cost me?" Maybe the Aruba contract man that is setting it all up says a flat rate or maybe he takes a percentage of your business. Either way, you're in.
You've got profits, you don't pay taxes, but you pay a price for setting up this business. Now, lets say, someone comes along and wants to question your taxes. You are not going to tell anyone how you set this all up because you knew it was illegal. You make a quick call to your contact in Aruba, he covers your buttinsky. You are now invovled in the web. And you are also involved in the washing machine of money laundering.

Joe Blow and his wife Nancy are on a cruise, they arrive at the stop off of Aruba, they like to blow some money in the casinos cuz Joe Blow is a big whale. He and his wife win money, lots of it, and they take that money and go to the bank to exchange the florins for Francs since they will be returning to their country. The bank takes the florins and gives them Francs, yes! That money is now taken off to another country and deposited back in Joe and Nancy Blows bank account in another country. It smells dirty, but it's not traced.

You on the other hand have money coming in and so you make a deposit where? Not back in the States, but in an account you set up in Aruba. The money might be drug money from someone that purchased a large item from your store. YOU deposited in the Aruba bank. That bank has it's own network with gov't people on the boards of directors so it has control over the bank. It also has as attorney's Antonio Carlos. The money is washed through the bank that is owned by mafia and controlled by gov't people, hoteliers etc.

Is tourism their number one thing in Aruba? Yep, they help wash money.
And they helped your business venture in Aruba and that helps you not pay high taxes which gives you more profits and you were never the wiser. Do they love American businessmen? Sure. Ask Silvetti, he wanted to set up an office there so he could do business with South America. Could be innocent venture. After mapping for oil. I don't know. What do you think?





Joe Blow doesn't sound like a French name.   ::MonkeyTongue::

Now there's the rub, living in a foreign country, gambling in another country and winning at that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:28:15 PM
Left you a present in Sports Frijole! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 03:34:44 PM


Update 2 of the Timeline is posted here. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4578.msg684032#msg684032)


Thanks for the sticky, Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: SS on February 21, 2009, 03:46:23 PM
The latest assumptions and creative fantasies show me the poster's minimal knowledge of facts and just how desperate this individual really is.  I actually find this humorous because it's so completely ridiculous.

I hope evryone is doing well.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:50:45 PM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 03:51:51 PM
That was interesting timing ehh Johan555?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 03:57:16 PM
ktf,

Kermit.Is this the boat that they leased back?
http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html

I think the boat you are thinking of was the one that Superior Offshore sold and then leased back with Hornbeck?
and the boats here are the ones that were part of the fishing fleet that he bought
 
Published January 4, 2008
FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.
Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.
The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
 

Hornbeck bought Achiever and planned the lease back.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS109172+09-Jan-2008+PRN20080109


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 04:01:34 PM
I find the SS references interesting.  Didn't she start posting here about the same
time as Caps?

She said that she never believed that it was Natalee in the cage/trap,
but she did.....on the same page as CBB's enhancement of the skull and tennis shoe.
you can click on a poster's name and see their "join date".  ::MonkeyWink::

SS       Scared Monkey    joined 2008-03-02     post 3214   

CAPS registered on December 21, 2007 and began posted on January 18, 2008.  SS registered on March 3, 2008 and submitted her first post on March 14, 2008.

SS began posting almost two month following CAPS first post on the SM forum.

What made me somewhat suspicious was that SS continued to upheld CAPS' research even when it was pointed out to her that it was flawed.

Janet

++++++
++++++

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2819.msg380092;topicseen#msg380092

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #750 5/2 -
« Reply #949 on: May 08, 2008, 09:34:43 PM »


SS ... this morning when you upheld CAPS on the forum as the source in regards to your to Patrick's blog ... your submission that implies that Patrick had known the VDS' for seven years and ... that Patrick had lived across the street from Deepak and Satish ... I was confused.  SS ... CAPS research was flawed which makes the implication in your submission wrong.

This is why I cannot understand why you are focusing on me and ... not CAPS.  I am sorry that you are troubled but ... I am only the messenger.

Am I making sense.

SS ... you know that I am not a Patrick advocate by a long stretch.  However ... implying on a public blog ... without credible backup ... that he has known the VDS' for seven years and ... lived across the street from Deepak and Satish ...

SS ... I cheered your submission when it was first posted on Patrick's blog.  Then in typical Tamikosmom style ... I requested the source.

When the following posts were revealed in a forum dialogue on April 19, 2008 as the foundation of your submission ... I was deeply concerned.

Janet

_______


SS' SUBMISSION TO PATRICK VAN DER EEM'S BLOG

38.  April 18th, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Justice for Natalee Holloway said:


I am sincerely disappointed to learn that you have known the van der Sloots for seven years, lived across the street from the Kalpoes, and staged the entire video with your friend Joran. You should be ashamed of yourself. I, for one, will not be purchasing your volume of fiction and I have no intention of stopping my boycott of Aruba.
 
http://patrickvandereem.nl/uncategorized/the-ongoing-boycot-aruba-saga/

______


PATRICK'S LONGTIME RELATIONSHIP WITH THE VDS'?

Quote from: CapsLockWizard on April 19, 2008, 06:31:47 PM

Here is your proof that where Patric lived in holland, he was only 15 minutes drive from the Sloot famaly and they know each other since 2003 according to this article.

check it out, it is in Dutch.

http://www.tctubantia.nl/algemeen/binnenland/2579829/Almelose-zakenman-ontfutselt-bekentenis.ece

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2793.msg375280#msg375280

_________


Quote from: caesu on April 19, 2008, 06:51:59 PM
 
it doesn't say that in that article.

it says he lives in a bungalow in Lathum - Zevenaar, 15 minutes from Arnhem.

and in 2003 he started his hydraulic hoses company in Almelo.

_______


PATRICK WAS THE SATISH AND DEEPAK'S NEIGHBOUR?

Quote from: CapsLockWizard on April 10, 2008, 05:41:04 AM


Hi monkeys,

My research is going well,

Kalpoe                             Bodjhperkash S   5/2/1964                Distr. Wanica   Seroe Patrishi 14C
Kalpoe, geb. Debipersad   Santakoemarie   10/28/1968   Distr.Saramacca   Seroe Patrishi 14C

The Above names are the Father and Mother Kalpoe and their address is Seroe Patrishi 41C

Ospina                              Martha B                     11/20/1950   Barranquilla   Seroe Patrishi 14F
van der Eem                        Patrick P                 4/1/1973     Curacao                Seroe Patrishi 14F

Now in 2005 Patrick was register as living in Aruba. His Address is just 1 house down across the street from the Kalpoe's

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg372608#msg372608

__________


Quote from: Tamikosmom on April 19, 2008, 09:58:19 PM
 
I feel like I am in a twilight zone.

Could somebody please clarify.

Thank you.

Janet

1.  Kalpoes' Mother -  Nadira Ramirez
2.  Kalpoes' Stepfather - Luiz Antonio Ramirez

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2793.msg375343;topicseen#msg375343



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 04:18:47 PM


Update 2 of the Timeline is posted here. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4578.msg684032#msg684032)


Thanks for the sticky, Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks lifesong

Janet

++++++
++++++



Update 1

12/18/2006
Superior Offshore International has announced the acquisition of Subtech Diving and Marine Pty Ltd in Durban, South Africa. (http://www.oilpubs.com/oso/article.asp?v1=5927)  Subtech’s role in the group is to support the international contracting entities within the group structure in a planned expansion programme by Superior to enter other international markets.

02/14/2007
John D. Silvetti, Conrad Daigle, and Marianne Silvetti-Voorhies register Aim For A Cure, Inc (http://www400.sos.louisiana.gov/cgibin?rqstyp=crpdtlC&rqsdta=36382577N).; a Louisiana, non-profit corporation

04/03/2007
Acergy wins contract to install pipeline for Petrobras (http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=43457) a contract worth USD 400 million in Brazil to install the Mexilhao gas export trunkline

04/20/2007
Initial Public Offering of Superior Offshore Int’l; raised $152 million (http://www.reuters.com/article/newIssuesNews/idUSWEN675520070420)

05/2007
Schaeffer contacts Dave Holloway
Schaefer purchases $3.5m home (http://galvestondailynews.com/story.lasso?ewcd=5569c50e755f68bbc8545f57966c90b3)

07/05/2007
Schaefer rings opening bell @ NASDAQ stock market (http://www.nasdaq.com/reference/200707/market_close_070507.stm)

08/14/2007
After defendants and other Company insiders liquidated over $49 million  (http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/showFilingResults/?qm_symbol=DEEP) of their personally held shares -- Superior Offshore begins revealing the truth about the Company problems existing at the IPO on 04/20/2007


09/2007
Superior Offshore South Africa is appointed as a major subcontractor (http://www.subtech.co.za/content/view/60/17/) to the Dredging International/Group 5 Consortium which has been awarded the DHEW (Durban Harbor Entrance Widening & Deepening contract) in Durban, South Africa.

10/23/2007
Superior Offshore International, Inc. (Nasdaq:DEEP) today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Ocean Flow International, LLC (http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=129346), a privately held deepwater subsea project engineering and offshore project management services firm based in Houston. The acquisition would be a stock-for-stock transaction valued at approximately $15 million. The closing, which is subject to customary conditions including obtaining certain consents, is expected in the fourth quarter of 2007

11/2007
Superior Offshore South Africa has purchased (http://www.subtech.co.za/content/view/60/17/) a Modular Jack-Up Barge which is expected to significantly enhance the company’s capacity in terms of inshore civil marine operations.

11/14/2007
Superior Offshore shares decline again after defendants belatedly revealed  (http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/showFilingResults/?qm_symbol=DEEP) that the Company was operating even below its recently revised forecasts, and that its core business was operating even worse than previously disclosed.

11/27/2007
The Persistence mobilization (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/11/mobilization.html) - We will leave the dock at Midnight on 27-November, 2007 to perform a "wet-test" on all the gear. This test will take approximately 2 days, where we will calibrate and test all the equipment under real survey conditions.

11/30/2007
Persistence departs for Aruba (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/11/iii-transit.html)

12/2007
Persistence search team meets with ALE Detective & his brother with a "vision", giving latitude of cage (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4466.msg657532#msg657532)

12/03/2007
Superior Offshore Amends Merger with Ocean Flow International (http://www.rigzone.com/news/company.asp?comp_id=4337); extends deadline for closing the acquisition to 12/28/2007.

12/15/2007
Persistence arrived at Aruba (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/12/vi-arrival.html) – “1615 hrs: ARRIVED at Aruba pilot station. Port Authorities board and the Persistence is cleared for docking.”

12/18/2007
“UPDATE: 1510 hrs: The Persistence has begun the search.” (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/12/vii-beginning-search.html)

12/20/2007
“Thurs. 20-Dec -0430 hrs:  The Persistence has completed the first day  (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/12/viii-day-1-side-scan-sonar-search.html) of the side scan sonar search.”

12/20/2007
CapsLockWizard registers at SM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3313), 09:38:24 PM

12/22/2007
Persistence team tests sensing equipment using local construction materials for a wire trap (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/12/viii-day-1-side-scan-sonar-search.html) to confirm detection and signatures.

12/22/2007
This is the date Caps claims in a 1/30/08 posting on SM  (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg333988#msg333988) that he “started to look at the case of Natalee.”

12/25/2007
Trap found.  Per oceanexploration (Kyle Kingman):  “The trap in Video 1-3 was found from the first conducted ROV dive.  I found the target at 1:46 am on Christmas morning. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047)  It was my #1 ranked priority target and therefore the first of the ROV dive series.”

12/28/2007
Superior Offshore International, Inc. (Nasdaq:DEEP) today announced that it has jointly agreed with Ocean Flow International L.L.C. to cancel a definitive merger agreement between the two companies. (http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=133607) Ocean Flow is a privately held deepwater subsea project engineering and offshore project management services firm.

"While both companies decided that now is not the right time to complete the merger, our discussions have laid the groundwork for what we expect to be a closer cooperative relationship in future marketing opportunities for large projects requiring deepwater fabrication and construction, pipeline engineering and project management capabilities," said Superior Offshore President and Chief Executive Officer Jim Mermis.

12/29/2007
ROV visual inspection of the trap (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360046#msg360046)

12/30/2007
ROV and Diver visual-only inspection of trap.  Tim Trahan's "No, nothing," dive. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282)  Dateline & Tim Miller off the ship.

12/31/2007
Mon 31-Dec - 1022hrs - NEW
The Persistence spent yesterday performing multiple dives with the ROV. (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/12/ix-dive-series-next-phase.html) The purpose of the dives is for collecting video of each sonar target. Typically, the sonar target is quickly identified and ruled out from the ROV video. The ROV operations lasted until dusk, where we resumed sonar survey operations through the night. Today, we are performing more ROV dives on targets of potential interest.

01/07/2008
ALE divers retrieve contents of the cage: (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047)  Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap.  The trap was not recovered.  Recovered samples sent for forensic analysis.  Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.

Persistence loses internet connection for 2 days. (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/x-persistence.html)

01/09/2008
Superior Offshore announced (http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/showFilingResults/?qm_symbol=DEEP) that it was suspending its prior substantially downward revised guidance. (Last date of stock purchases included in class action suits)

01/10/2008
Kyle has a few days off of the boat (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321); stays at the HI from 1/10 to 1/14.

01/11/2008 -01/12/2008
Kyle claims he saw a Dutch/Aruban vessel (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321) (Panter) on site over the cage location.

01/17/2008
CapsLockWizard’s first posting to SM Forum (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2527.msg329723#msg329723), 10:18:50 PM

01/17/2008
Persistence gets call to help the “Michelle” in distress. (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xii-perilous-seas.html)

01/21/2008
Caps posts: (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2532.msg330838#msg330838)  “Klaasend:  Any news from BT?  Need her to communicate”

01/22/2008
HOUSTON, Jan. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ (http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS260995+22-Jan-2008+PRN20080122) -- Superior Offshore International, Inc. (Nasdaq: DEEP) today announced that it has completed the sale and charter-back of the Superior Achiever with Hornbeck Offshore Services
LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. (NYSE: HOS)

02/2008
The previous owners of Subtech Diving and Marine  have negotiated the buy back (http://www.subtech.co.za/content/view/60/17/) of Superior Offshore South Africa from Superior Offshore International Inc.

02/2008
Monserrat pond is full of water.

02/07/2008
Caps posts on SM open forum (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2582.msg344553#msg344553) regarding what the new witness claims to have seen

02/12/2008
Council of Ministers of Aruba (http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/JAN_2009/12_FEBR_CARTA_WAF__1___Medium_.JPG) makes a decision leading Edison Briesen, Minister of Tourism & Transportation to appoint MTBS  (Maritime & Transport Business Solutions) as Project Manager to lead and direct the redevelopment of the Aruban harbor areas.

02/15/2008
The Persistence blog maintained by Kyle Kingman posts a request for donations (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/02/support-effort.html) through Texas Equusearch.

02/22/2008
E. Briesen sends a letter to Juan Manuel Trujillo (http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/JAN_2009/12_FEBR_CARTA_WAF__1___Medium_.JPG) in Madrid, Spain advising him of the appointment of MTBS as Project Manager of the redevelopment of Aruban harbor areas.

02/22/08
The Dateline episode (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23302471#23302581) on the Persistence search is broadcast.

02/26/2008
Dana Pretzer hosts Art Wood on his radio show. (http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2008/02/26/the-dana-pretzer-show-on-scared-monkeys-radio-listen-live-tuesday-february-26th-at-9pm-eastern-guests-include-pat-brown-robert-peters-christopher-lyons-art-wood-and-scared-monkeys/) Concerning the Persistence search, Art says, “They've identified over 100 possible targets that could be Natalee on the ocean floor. They're trying to narrow that list to 30 or 40 more likely targets, they can dive on them however John has informed us that they have run out of money. Actually, if they can't come up with some donations within the next week to 10 days, they're going to be bringing the boat home.”

02/27/2008
Two members of the Persistence crew perform side scan sonar survey of the Montserrat pond. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg356876#msg356876)

02/27/2008
Robin posts the cage pictures received from the FBI at BNH.

Kyle learns that Robin has posted the screenshots rec’d from the FBI (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.msg356249#msg356249)

02/28/2008
Kyle, posting at SM, makes two references to having been away from the search.
•   “I'm getting caught up with the data collected while I've been off the boat.” (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg356886#msg356886)
•   “I've personally been handling the matter* while I was on the east coast last week.“ (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg357222#msg357222)
[*Note: the matter = selling television rights to the search]

02/28/2008
Article by Cynthia Cisneros, Houston ABC affiliate (http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951), quotes Louis J. Schaefer:
•   “I've dedicated a million dollars, I've gone way above that," said Louis Schafer of Underwater Expeditions.
•   "I feel like it's time to ask for help from the American people that want to see this case solved." 
•   "By Friday, we will have surveyed the entire 50-square mile off Aruba," Schafer said.
•   "We have identified at least 60 of the targets. we have about 150 more targets to inspect."  "So we have completely mapped the ocean floor, we know every object that's there, we know every object that could be a container holding her in the sea,” he said.

Tim Trahan is quoted in the same article:
"And we all feel, I'm speaking from everybody on the team, that she's in one of the targets we have not looked at yet," Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions said. "We can't stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we've located it, we just need to get to it."

02/29/08
The first class action lawsuit against Superior Offshore Int’l (http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/showFilingResults/?qm_symbol=DEEP) is announced on behalf of shareholders who purchased stock between 4/20/07 and 1/09/08.

02/29/08 - NEW
Air Force 2 is on Aruba. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358016#msg358016)

03/01/2008
Post by blog-owner Red (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358515#msg358515) in open forum at SM:

“ABC Interview with Louis Schafer on Thursday
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951

I will just come out and say it only because I am shocked at the quick pace of the termination of the search.  WHO THE HELL WAITS UNTIL LAST MINUTE TO ASK FOR HELP IN DONATIONS ONLY TO ONE DAY LATER LEAVE ANYHOW!!!  You could have least given it a chance.  I am sorry, but that makes no sense coming from a business man like Louis Schafer. Long ago he could have contacted SM and done a media blitz that would have donated funds. Also, people of major means could have been asked.  However, for the most part this type of money is not gained thru public solicitation ... its gained thru millionaires private Rolodex. 
I hope there is another more positive reason.”

03/01/2008
The Persistence blog maintained by Kyle Kingman announces the side scan sonar search is complete (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/02/xviii-sonar-search-complete.html) and the RV Persistence is leaving Aruba.


03/02/2008
Kyle Kingman and the search team of the Persistence fly out of Aruba. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358568#msg358568)

03/03/2008
Persistence and crew leave Aruba, sailing to the home port in Louisiana (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358568#msg358568)
 
John Silvetti meets with CapsLockWizard

03/12/2008
The RV Persistence arrives back in Louisiana (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg363730#msg363730)

03/16/2008
Witness, urged to step forward by Dave Holloway and accompanied by his lawyer, gives a statement to the Prosecutor’s Office.

03/18/2008
Agent Shipley arrives back in Aruba

Caps has spoken to John Silvetti and John is in contact with Hans Mos.

Kyle equates the tip Dave rec’d concerning a trap with the trap he (Kyle) had found:  “the tip Dave got said the trap was 2-3 miles offshore. I found this one 2-3 miles offshore. 2.1-2.2 miles if memory serves.”

Kyle confirms that the pond Caps is referring to near the soccer field is the same pond that was searched by the RV Persistence team.

Kyle posts his opinion (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366455#msg366455) that neither the trap nor its contents should be disregarded until it is known how the trap got there and what the nature of its contents were.

NEW - Kyle posts a Disclaimer (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366347#msg366347):  “Further, what comes from me should be independantly verified as factual.”

NEW - And repeats it: (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366455#msg366455)  “A lot of what I share is what I was directly involved in.  However, much of what I share is 2nd and 3rd hand, but the closest we've got in some cases, hence the saltshaker should be used liberally.”


03/20/2008
Private Eye reveals to Kyle his knowledge of the blue denim and skull in an open post on the SM Forum (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367178#msg367178). 

Kyle repeatedly asks Private Eye to email him privately for further discussion. 
•   “Private Eye, Please email me to discuss this further, not in the forum thanks!” (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367180#msg367180) 
•   “I don't think I said anything about the type of fabric sampled from the trap in the forum.  I'm not sure where this came from.  In any case, PE please email me to discuss.“ (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367181#msg367181) 
•   “would a moderator please send Private Eye my email address?  Thanks in advance.” (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367182#msg367182)

NEW - Kyle then tells PE he is unaware of denim. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367186#msg367186)

Kyle speaks with Tim Trahan. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367217#msg367217)
“I just got off the phone with Tim Trahan a few minutes ago talking about returning to dive on the remaining targets.  There are plans to return, we just need to figure out the details of when and how.  The "how" question will help us figure out how much more funds we need to raise, if any.  I'm not involved in this.”

03/21/2008
Kyle went to Johns house and all things Holloway were stripped from the boat he said

03/24/2008
Agent Shipley went to Aruba and MOS is opposing the request to drain and search the pond

Klye posted at SM: "The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample."
The first post of CapsLockWizard’s posted on: (SM) January 17, 2008, 10:18:50 PM
Remains were taken on January 17 sent to the FBI on January 22/24...

03/26/2008
Email from CapsLockWizard to Dave Holloway:
That was the first report.
Did you received the second report about
I did send it to you read it with the google earth data file.
How do I know that you are Dave?
there are to many danger peaople out there.
Beside to what I have heard, the body may be in another place now.  But that is what this person connected to the government is saying not knowing who I am
Why did it took so long to Answer?

03/27/2008
Kyle emails Kermit stating that he is going offshore in a day.


04/03/2008
When asked how much money would be needed to complete the search, John D. Silvetti posts at BFN under the screenname dsurveyor1 (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg335011#msg335011) “It is very difficult to say, since Louis has not selected a ROV vessel and we do not know how much of a humanitarian discount we can count on by the vessel and ROV owners, but my guess is that we will be looking at around 1 million dollars.”

04/03/2008 - NEW
John D. Silvetti posts at BFN under the screenname dsurveyor1 (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg335025#msg335025), “I feel the sites are as safe as they can be. All survey data that was collected, other than what was shared with the authorities, is in our possesion. No data has yet to be released, especially target data......locations”

04/03/2008
John D. Silvetti posts at BFN under the screenname dsurveyor1 (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg335019#msg335019), “We received support from the Police, the Coast Guard, the Port Authority and vitually anyone we needed help from.”

Read entire John Silvetti thread at BFN. (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.0)- NEW

04/07/2008
Kyle tells (Freebirds?) that he was just asked by Mos, through John Silvetti, to expedite the analysis of the pond search and to send a report brief.  Mos is calling for the draining and full search of the pond.

04/24/2008
All of the officers resign from Superior OffShore (http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t2B9.d.htm); “Company has ceased all ongoing operations other than those deemed necessary to ensure (i) the public safety; (ii) the health and safety of the Company’s employees; and (iii) an orderly transition of certain projects to its customers.  All of the Company’s employees have been terminated except for those necessary to assist in the wind-down of the Company’s affairs.”


04/25/2008
Superior OffShore announces filing of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy (http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t2By.d.htm)

05/2008
Monserrat pond is completely dry.

05/05/2008
Caps posts about the pond being roped off, 09:49:42 PM. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379191#msg379191)
“Hi Monkeys,  News,  The area in question now is off limited to anyone. A steel chain from across road with a sign saying area prohibited.  The area have dried a lot but still a deep end with water in it. I went to see it yesterday and I could not have access anymore.  Another thing, today a group of CSI (52 in total ) arrived from holland are in Aruba to work on the case. (secret mission)  In news paper this week Nancy Grace in Aruba to do a film on the case. More Later.”

Caps posts further information, (also contradictory), 10:38:58 PM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379227#msg379227)
“No, I have not.  But the light of the soccer field was on this whole weekend till 3:30 am in the morning, Today day are off. but it seems that this goup is here a week already they are the one that seal the area. Also Saterday night goining in sunday early morninng, sources said that they saw a lot new face in the are of Lekker.”

Caps further posts an “update” on the witness, 11:06:59 PM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379248#msg379248)
“Today withness talk to lawyer to see what is the hold-up, lawyer state every thing is OK and group are working on the case. Large dutch CSI. (case is under the microscope---but no american involvment is a bit strange.)  After deliberating with withness on this, we conclude 3 things that might come out of this.  The case will break wide open and all players will be found or they came in secret now that the water has gone to do a forensic and find Natalee remains or cleanup what they could not cleanup in 3 years and say "se la vi" to the case  MOS seems to go for option-1 but like I said, he still have to fight a Dirtyhand in his Office / organization.
Latest is that OM is now in hot water since they also have somehow exceed the 2001 till 2005 budged (OVER SPEND), also no one was watching the money that they were collecting from big fines and other confiscated moneys. The is a problem (hot scandal comming out soon from this office.)”

Caps posts further information, (also contradictory), 11:13:06 PM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379251#msg379251)
“How strange.... Today in matter of fact, the ALE got this special dog that is trained to sniff drugs, money and human remains.  it has arrived yesterday.”

Caps repeats, 11:20:01 PM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379254#msg379254)
“Sorry to say, but the dog arrived yesterday and was delivert today at the Police station. it Did not go to work yet. Need to get use to aruba a bit a gues..  Was in customs care..”

Caps then posts unsubstantiated “facts”, as follows:
11:29:40 PM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379258#msg379258):  “Here is another good findings.  FACT the first person arrested was Bulo and he was the boyfriend of the early week.”
12:07:28 AM: (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379268#msg379268)  “Now two years before 2005 this girls was in Aruba, and she knew Bulo already. now she came to aruba and she spend the first part of the week with Bulo, on the night in C&C she was with Bulo entering and exiting the place several times. At closing time she knew them already and thats why she jumped in the car with them. Now lets look at this of what I got from my investigation in talking to people that are frequent C&C. on the night in question.  You see I am missing a person which is the duppleganger of Natalee. In all the duppleganger some one dies but it is the wrong person.  I was thinking that at the night in question, either Natalee and her Double must have met.  I Page flew 2 day earlier, than she is not there. that leaves me with someone else.  who?”

05/08/2008
Kyle posts that John Silvetti told him on this day that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

05/08/2008
Caps posts more unsubstantiated “facts”, together with a story of losing his shoe in a pond as a child. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379902#msg379902)
“Who is Bulo. Bulo is the Nickname of Lorenzo Van Rijn. He was the first that was detain for questioning & not arrested. (was never in the news because of his association with other bigshot in ALE) so that never hid the news.
Two days later they went to his mama house and there he desided to colobrorate with the ALE.”
“Matty Apartment.: After Researching what the commun form to do a quicky is in Aruba, and from strategic elimination process and with the help of someone that work the escort industry, who lead me to the kalpoe father that owns the VIP club who's in the back there is an access to the apartments”
“Now Matty the owner died long time ago, but this place is run by the Kalpoes famaly but they are not the only one with keys. The one that runs the News also has key to this apartments.”
“I google "Where is natalee" and it brought me to this place called SM and I read summery and then I remeber as a kid how I lost a brand new sneaker. Imaging comming home with one sneaker missing and telling dad that I lost it. Where? in the pond.”

05/08/2008
the Company (Superior Offshore Int’l, Inc.)  filed a motion with the Court (http://apps.shareholder.com/sec/viewerContent.aspx?companyid=DEEP&docid=5934031) for authority to sell a
12-Man 300 meter skid-mounted saturation diving system and related
equipment to Global Industries Offshore LLC (“Global”) for a cash payment
of $6,750,000.00

05/14/2008
Kyle posts in open forum at SM (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2830.msg381276#msg381276) regarding the pond, essentially repeating Caps message of 5/05/08 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379191#msg379191).
“Greetings, I'm sure you've already heard, but the pond is ropped off and now dry.  40 investigators from Holland were brought in related to the case.  No word on the outcome yet.  All the best”

And then claims (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2830.msg381287#msg381287) he doesn’t know about Caps’ pond:
Thanks all.  I don't know what pond Caps is talking about.  I'm referring to the pond we searched back in February.  I hope you're all well.  Best Regards,
~Kyle

05/15/2008
Kyle says Mos, the Polis, and J. Silvetti are accusing him of leaking the photos to SM and asks for our (Freebirds?) help.

05/15/2008
Destiny requests (and receives) Klaas’ assistance (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2830.msg381723#msg381723) in posting 3 pictures of the “drained pond”  next to the soccer field in open forum at SM:
“KLAAS....just got 3 *pond* photos in email from Aruba.....maybe more coming too....I don't know how to post them from my email to here in the forum....If I send them to you on your hotmail acct.,...can you post them for me?...TIA...Destiny”

Destiny asks OE (Kyle) if the pictures are of the same pond: (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2844.msg381841#msg381841)
“OE, Did you see the 3 new photos we got today?   Is it the same pond you scanned?....please let me know....it's driving me crazy.... TIA...Destiny”

OE (Kyle) confirms that it is: (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2844.msg381855#msg381855)
“Yes, it is certainly the same pond that we searched in February.”

05/17/2008
Kyle posts/emails (to Freebirds?):
“I need immediate help.  I need to know what we know about Caps and Destiny. I need their names if possible.  I also need the information Caps originally posted about the pond search. Preferably the original posts with date and time stamps.  Apparently I'm being accused by Mos, the Polis, and J. Silvetti as leaking the photos to SM” 

Kyle needs to know from US (Freebirds?) who leaked the photos. He states he believes Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand. "Mos knows there is a mole deep within the investigation"

Kyle sends an email to John Silvetti which he has copied posts from SM of CAPS and Destiny and Klassend and Spock. He is defending himself that he didn't know who posted the pond pictures at SM.

06/2008
Petrobras talks/meetings were held in ARUBA

06/10/2008
Kyle posts/emails (to Freebirds?):
“Well, it's all going to happen. The big card will soon be played.  I just had a secret meeting with Tim Trahan and by proxy, Louis Shafer. Tomorrow, Tim Trahan will get in touch with Beth Holloway in regards to the trap footage and missing evidence. We're getting geared up to play the conspiracy cover-up card on Aruba and force the bogus investigation out into the open. We believe the trap footage may be the missing piece which will raise a BIG question in the minds of the public everywhere”

06/16/2008
Kyle posts/emails (to Freebirds?):
“On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop. Tim Trahan has allied himself with me.
What John's doing in Aruba, I am not entirely sure now although I know it's got to do with the pond search and some business relations.
loathe the thought of going around John with the trap info but that's Tim's decision, not mine. It was Tim who wanted me involved in where we are going now.”

06/29/2008
Kyle Kingman flies to John Silvetti’s house

12/23/2008
John D. Silvetti, Conrad Daigle, and Marianne Silvetti-Voorhies register ;  a Louisiana limited liability company.


 (http://www400.sos.louisiana.gov/cgibin?rqstyp=crpdtlC&rqsdta=36925547KOSV Determination, L.L.C.[/url)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: SS on February 21, 2009, 04:36:43 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 04:40:14 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




Why are you so worried about what we discuss?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 21, 2009, 04:41:30 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 05:03:27 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.





SS ... rather than being sarcastic with your God-given ability to articulate ... an explanation would be appreciate to why you continue to uphold CAPS every word ... even when his research is flawed ... even when his theories change ... even when deception is revealed ... even when he undermines Natalee Holloway's mother and step-father ... even when ...

SS ... you know that I can backup everything that I have just stated.

Janet






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 05:09:18 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

In my opinion ... SS words were not funny bastibro.

Kyle Kingman's words exposes a deception that implies that Natalee Holloway will never be returned to her family ... never returned to her country and ... CAPS supports that deception.

Think about it.  If there had been a possibility that your loved one was in that trap/cage ... would you be dismissing Kyle Kingman own words?  Would you be laughing at SS's post?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 05:11:10 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 05:15:25 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.



SS (and all Monkey alum's),

While I consider that a compliment, please don't undermine my independence.  I'm just me.  I'm nobody to anyone involved in this case in any way.  I've never communicated off of this public forum with anyone involved in the case, or with any other poster on any of these forums.  I've never claimed that have and I never will.

The only thing I'm convinced of so far is that we still don't know the truth about what happened to Natalee and where she is.

That's all I'm after.  This has gone on long enough.  How many years?  How many more?  How many more Christmas' do Beth and Dave have to spend not knowing?  How many other Natalee's are we not available to help because this continues to drag on.

I truly want the truth that comes out to be exactly that which I cannot let go of.  That very good people have been working behind the scenes for over a year in a grand and beautiful Finale of Justice for Natalee Holloway.

I want the truth to show John Silvetti to be of the same caliber of man as Tim Miller.  I do not know that he isn't.

There's nothing to be afraid of here or upset about. 

We have this in common:  We All Care.  For Natalee, that has got to be bigger than our differences.

Let's get to the truth.  That's why we're all here.

Post to the board.  I'll include it.  Both sides, all sides, every side.

Even the ridges.   ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 21, 2009, 05:16:52 PM
Sorry but SS will not be responding to any questions.  I will not tolerate these drive byes any longer.  SS has been banned.  NEXT?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 21, 2009, 05:19:30 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

In my opinion ... SS words were not funny bastibro.

Kyle Kingman's words exposes a deception that implies that Natalee Holloway will never be returned to her family ... never returned to her country and ... CAPS supports that deception.

Think about it.  If there had been a possibility that your loved one was in that trap/cage ... would you be dismissing Kyle Kingman own words?  Would you be laughing at SS's post?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

To me they were funny Janet, i think SS gave us an example of the fact that we shouldn't`t take everything to serious.
She`s not a believer of all this cage theory`s and neither am I.
Regarding Caps, well, I think he must be feeling very important when reading all the posts about him lately.
Don`t give him to much credit.
IMO he always was a liability ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 05:24:12 PM
Dear Janet, Mags, Wreck, KTF, and Kermit aka Lifesong,

I can no longer continue with my masquerade.  You have discovered the truth.  I am a special agent for the Aruban Government and I have worked with Caps for many years.  My assignment has been to completely disrupt the Natalee Holloway investigation.  My father is Dick Cheyney.  I was in charge of Haliburton's Middle East Operations for many years, and I do know John Silvetti through Iris's Scientology group.




 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

In my opinion ... SS words were not funny bastibro.

Kyle Kingman's words exposes a deception that implies that Natalee Holloway will never be returned to her family ... never returned to her country and ... CAPS supports that deception.

Think about it.  If there had been a possibility that your loved one was in that trap/cage ... would you be dismissing Kyle Kingman own words?  Would you be laughing at SS's post?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

To me they were funny Janet, i think SS gave us an example of the fact that we shouldn't`t take everything to serious.
She`s not a believer of all this cage theory`s and neither am I.
Regarding Caps, well, I think he must be feeling very important when reading all the posts about him lately.
Don`t give him to much credit.
IMO he always was a liability ::MonkeyWink::

I do take two parents having their child MURDERED,as well as the MURDER being cover-up by a corrupt GOVT VERY SERIOUS.If you don't agree with the cage/trap theory please explain why and back it up!PERIOD..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 05:27:11 PM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool::


Again.Pay attention to the patterns!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 21, 2009, 05:41:29 PM
Sorry but SS will not be responding to any questions.  I will not tolerate these drive byes any longer.  SS has been banned.  NEXT?

Who wants to be next?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/DriveByeNext.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 05:42:14 PM
KTF,

I just saw your note in Musings.  Did I miss your question here? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 05:44:48 PM
KTF,

I just saw your note in Musings.  Did I miss your question here? 

Forgot what i was gonna say.Probably something irrelevant regarding the leaseback of the Superior achiever.Thanx Though!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 05:48:10 PM


Who wants to be next?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/DriveByeNext.gif)

You are just crackin' me up! 

That's funny, I don't care who you are!  courtesy of billb's uncle or some other relative...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 21, 2009, 05:49:15 PM
KTF,

I just saw your note in Musings.  Did I miss your question here? 

Forgot what i was gonna say.Probably something irrelevant regarding the leaseback of the Superior achiever.Thanx Though!

OK.  If not, post it.  I'll be MIA for a bit tonight, but I always read to catch up. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 05:51:16 PM


Who wants to be next?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/DriveByeNext.gif)

You are just crackin' me up! 

That's funny, I don't care who you are!  courtesy of billb's uncle or some other relative...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

BillB has family.I always thought he lived in a cabin up in the backwoods! ::MonkeyDance::
Just Kidding BillB..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 05:57:11 PM


Who wants to be next?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/DriveByeNext.gif)

You are just crackin' me up! 

That's funny, I don't care who you are!  courtesy of billb's uncle or some other relative...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

BillB has family.I always thought he lived in a cabin up in the backwoods! ::MonkeyDance::
Just Kidding BillB..

No,no,no....that's me in the cabin in the backwoods...with goats and Hudson.
Billb has his cousin Larry the Cable Guy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 05:57:27 PM
903 on: Today at 08:56:28 PM  SAN  pg 46
Why would they want to not question this persons motives.  They came on with both guns drawn and refused to answer certain questions. Why?  Why are they covering for these people all of a sudden.  Is someone related to one of these individuals that we don't know of
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.900
 
 #904 on: Today at 08:59:53 PM   ktf
In my personal opinion.Some of these posters are either related or work for these people
 

----------------------------------
POSTER related or work for these people?

Smith, Halliburton, and Hughes are top oil drilling companies in the US.  I know this for sure because of personal experience.      Cheyney = Halliburton   Did our VP pop into Aruba to discuss some geological surveys before TES left?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4101.msg545029#msg545029
 

November 06, 2008, 10:08:08 PM 
Thirty-two years ago, I lived In Isfahan, Iran for two years[/b].  The left hand was used for toilet functions because their bathroom facilities are very different than ours are.  They don't use toilet paper
//http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3697.msg527697#msg527697
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3697.msg527697#msg527697
 

Think about it IRAN = BIG OIL

Iran is set to sell stakes in Isfahan and Trabiz refineries,

LOOK at the second paragraph where Iran is going to privatize 45 companies.
 IT's all about OIL companies in Iran.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=36256518

Now look at this:
These pensions, which include New York City’s five main funds and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, hold $3.7 billion worth of shares in energy companies involved in Iran, out of a total $570 billion in assets.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/25/business/worldbusiness/25fund.html


WHERE IS ISFAHAN:
Isfahan or Esfahan (historically also rendered as Ispahan, Old Persian Aspadana, Middle Persian Spahan, Persian اصفهان) located about 340 km south of Tehran is Iran (Persia)'s third largest city. Isfahan has been designated by UNESCO as a world heritage city. It contains a wide variety of Islamic Architectural sites ranging from the 11th century to the 19th.

Congressman Sherman Says Iran More Likely to Nuke Isfahan than Israel
http://www.niacouncil.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=480&Itemid=2

IRAN SIGNS GAS DEAL WITH HALLIBURTON SUBSIDIARY. U.S. oil-services company Halliburton has won a tender to drill in two phases of the South Pars gas field, Iranian state television reported on 9 January. "Some American officials have shares in Halliburton," state television added, without providing any names.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2005/3-170105.htm
-----------------------------------------------



BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 06:07:45 PM


Who wants to be next?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/DriveByeNext.gif)

You are just crackin' me up! 

That's funny, I don't care who you are!  courtesy of billb's uncle or some other relative...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

BillB has family.I always thought he lived in a cabin up in the backwoods! ::MonkeyDance::
Just Kidding BillB..

No,no,no....that's me in the cabin in the backwoods...with goats and Hudson.
Billb has his cousin Larry the Cable Guy.

Whenever i think of a lady that lives in a cabin in the backwoods.I think of Annie Wilkes(Kathy Bates) from the movie "Misery".Only if Joran could come across her!Luckily you are the nice lady that knits sweaters,hats,as well as socks! ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 06:08:38 PM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::


Without an explanation the patterns do not make sense when it comes to the upholding of CAPS.

Back in May, 2008 ... Mum and I were on the same page in regards to CAPS ... the same page I have been on since CAPS made his initial appearance at the end of January, 2008.

Somewhere along the way Mum jumped back on the CAPS bandwagon.  What changed?   It was not CAPS who changed.

Why do CAPS supporters never offer an explanation as to their reasoning in their decision to follow this guy wherever he may lead.  It is downright scary.

Justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family have definitely taken a backseat.

Janet

+++++++

MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1412 on: May 06, 2008, 01:59:31 PM »


SS...I have read that as well...I have also read where he said it was other apartments, Dutch owned and not the Matty apartments. I am not going to go back to the first thread and find Cap's posts as I questioned him more than a couple of times as to why he changed his mind and he never answered!

He also didn't respond as to why he told me no to the Ind/Lion's Den in the first thread.

All that being said...he hasn't backed up his posts...just because Caps said it, doesn't make it so!

 I am sorry I don't mean to upset you, but you can post Caps posts forever and I will just keep telling you what he said previously.

I still want to know why he changed from the other apartments to the Matty and he will not answer!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379364#msg379364


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1424 on: May 06, 2008, 02:41:59 PM »


SS…let me ask you one question…

If I post the Freddy Zedan owns the Indo/Lion’s Den are you going to just take my word for it?

 Caps posts that the Kalpoes - the father or the stepfather, he never did answer which one, according to a girl there, now own it!

You can certainly take what Caps says without questions, but I will not. So please do not repost Caps post to me....Show me the proof!

 I have read everyone of Cap’s post at least three times…each day I type out an index…you would be very surprised what you see on the third read.

All I am trying to say is what you are posting from Caps is not what he said in January!

I am 99% sure as to why he switched to the Indo apartments…the answer is in one of your last few posts…and I will leave it at that!

And yes Lala’s…I am extremely frustrated…seems we have involved just about everyone on Aruba…new names are dropped every week.…I never see Joran’s name in this thread anymore!!!!!

And everytime Caps appears we have more questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COLUMBO has a word for that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379383#msg379383


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1440 on: May 06, 2008, 06:42:17 PM »


Guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don't have to give him the benefit of the doubt just because he's Caps

All I see is a whole lot of new names and misinformation and very few facts...Giovanni, Deutekom, Bulo, Freddy that doesn't exist, odd-bods living at the kalpoes address, list of names that don't match the phone book...
 
Yes, something is going on at that pond, and we are still dealing with Aruba. I'm in total agreement with Lala's on this one, nothing will come of the pond.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379502#msg379502


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1450 on: May 06, 2008, 07:32:02 PM »


SS...A simple question as to if Deutekom was a Judge should have been answered 150 pages ago....so should the reason for him going back to the Indo/Lion's Den after he told me no to there. these are simple questions and both merit an answer!

I can't buy Cap's Dirty Hand Deutekom, because how he got to him was flawed. If he is not a Judge he wouldn't have been on that list. It is as simple as that!

There are more questions now than when Caps first started posting!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379518#msg379518


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1456 on: May 06, 2008, 11:11:21 PM »


Well I guess we are all frustrated today!

I attempted to explain to Caps at least 3 times the Judges list, and as one who tries to answer other poster’s questions, and acknowledge their posts I expected an answer on at least one of those occasions! If you have read my posts you would know that I have acknowledged that Deutekom may be a ‘Dirty Hand’ , just questioning the way he got there.

You can check my posts for this morning and see that I try to ‘share’ what I know! Have a look and see if my answer to another poster was even acknowledged!

I guess in your opinion it is OK for Caps to fire of all these questions at us, but he is not obligated to answer ours. Most of my questions to him have been about posts he has made and names like Bulo’s that we have never heard of. I have asked very few about things I am researching.

I have not asked any more from Caps than I would have asked from any other poster…back up your posts! BS on putting him in any sort of position! Not to the questions I have asked anyways.

Yes there are other theories on this thread, and I for one am sick and tired of having only one jammed down my throat.

I have read Caps posts many times and it is up to me if I go along with everything or anything he says.  Maybe it might help some if you let Caps know that it is creating problems by him dropping names with no other info….it would help a lot and certainly save some of us a lot of time….

JMHO

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379582#msg379582


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1459 on: May 06, 2008, 11:33:41 PM »


... as you said this is a discussion forum and I have reason to question things in Caps posts! Most times when I have done so I do not receive an answer or if I do it is the post of Caps I am referring to posted back to me. Sorry … to me that is not discussion.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379591#msg379591


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1467 on: May 07, 2008, 08:06:50 AM »


SS...Caps started posting in the NAH thread around mid-January. Klaas explained at the time that he had been posting on the front page previously. After 4 or 5 days Caps started posting in the Shango thread. This would have been way back in the first thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379694#msg379694


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1468 on: May 07, 2008, 09:28:28 AM »


SS… You are right. I think Caps has information that has nothing to do with Shango as well. Caps does know the corruption and the ‘dark’ side of Aruba. He knows some of the players, probably a lot.

When Caps first started posting in the forum he knew very little about the case, or so it appears from his early posts. He asked us about the family, the friends, the private plane and the pimps. He asked about the suspects and about the people such as Julia and others that continually misinformed us. He needed our help and knowledge with these pieces of the puzzle. There is nothing wrong with that, I personally have spent a lot of time and posts sharing any information I had or could find.

A lot of time it seems to me that Caps has a piece that he feels fits into a Shango/Simian/Merian post, and just makes it fit. He has the player, the corrupt official, so that is the answer to that part of the riddle.

An example of this would be ‘the yellowhammer’. We started with a yellow hummer way back in the first thread, and most disagreed back then. When it was revisited recently and many posted that they thought it was the bird, Caps said OK, we’ll go with the bird, we’ll refine and correct any errors in his interpretations. The next day, Caps posts that he doesn’t think it is the bird. Our interpretation of ‘the yellowhammer’ doesn’t fit into Cap’s deciphering of the riddle.

I find this very frustrating. To me it is not that difficult.

Thanks everyone for the input on Bulo yesterday. Pita sorry for the confusion I may have caused on the Benz site. Somehow I confused myself…Vms…sounds like a good idea…maybe clear up some loose ends like Giovanni and Bulo…

 I think I need to go and sit in the grandstand with Lala’s and the other grannies for a day or two and go back to my own research.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379700#msg379700


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1493 on: May 08, 2008, 09:33:46 AM »


This is a previous discussion about Ben VocKing. Below are 2 of Caps older posts regarding VocKing. So in February and March Caps knew who VocKing was, but not on April 25th.

Somewhere back around page 40 Caps posted a key in which he includes a pic of VocKing. You will notice that Caps refers to a picture of Voking in his response above.

Around pages 45 and 46 there is much discussion about the photo of VocKing and which is the correct one. The photo of VocKing that Caps included in his key and showed to the man who knew him very well is not of the person we determined to be VocKing.

This is why I ask questions…

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379920#msg379920


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1494 on: May 08, 2008, 09:41:12 AM »


These posts of Caps have been etched in mind since March. Another reason I ask questions.

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379922#msg379922


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1495 on: May 08, 2008, 10:12:11 AM »


Here is Cap's picture of Vocking.

Hotping...Thanks for the prayer. After the posts from last night, for the sake of harmony I have decided to refrain from posting in this thread any more.

Enjoy the Tango!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379926#msg379926


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1500 on: May 08, 2008, 11:55:52 AM
»

Vms…I have suspected from very early on from Cap’s posts who Caps really is. I did not come to this conclusion from any mailing list from ‘our friend in Aruba’. Posts over the last 24 hours have confirmed my suspicions. Not everyone is whom they appear to be…I need to walk away!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379938#msg379938


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #750 5/2 -
« Reply #936 on: May 08, 2008, 08:30:49 PM »


SS…since you bought this over from the Shango thread….there is no group attack on Caps. I have asked him to answer questions about his posts. He has not done so, on most occasions IMO. I said this morning that I would walk away. I have.

Many of my questions regarding Caps surround Ben Vocking. I posted on that this morning. Please go back and read from page 39 to page 46 of the thread. Open the links. Read Caps response very carefully and then read what I posted this morning.

I am not going to respond any further on the subject.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2819.msg380072#msg380072


++++++++


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #454 on: January 02, 2009, 11:06:23 PM »


Janet...You are like a pitbull...LOL

Nobody knows my position on this at this time...I am not ready to elaborate any more...I am Sorry.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609545;topicseen#msg609545


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 06:17:53 PM
Janet,

  It's very simple.Put your theory out there and back it up!I'm willing to listen to things as long as it's logical and makes sense to me.CapsLockWizard,as well as what transpired with the Persistence make no sense to me.Poster's will say they don't believe the trap/cage theory but have yet to post anything of substance as to why their theory is correct.I'm still waiting.ANYONE! ::MonkeyCool::

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 06:29:07 PM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::


Without an explanation the patterns do not make sense when it comes to the upholding of CAPS.

Back in May, 2008 ... Mum and I were on the same page in regards to CAPS ... the same page I have been on since CAPS made his initial appearance at the end of January, 2008.

Somewhere along the way Mum jumped back on the CAPS bandwagon.  What changed?   It was not CAPS who changed.

Why do CAPS supporters never offer an explanation as to their reasoning in their decision to follow this guy wherever he may lead.  It is downright scary.

Justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family have definitely taken a backseat.

Janet

+++++++

MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1412 on: May 06, 2008, 01:59:31 PM »


SS...I have read that as well...I have also read where he said it was other apartments, Dutch owned and not the Matty apartments. I am not going to go back to the first thread and find Cap's posts as I questioned him more than a couple of times as to why he changed his mind and he never answered!

He also didn't respond as to why he told me no to the Ind/Lion's Den in the first thread.

All that being said...he hasn't backed up his posts...just because Caps said it, doesn't make it so!

 I am sorry I don't mean to upset you, but you can post Caps posts forever and I will just keep telling you what he said previously.

I still want to know why he changed from the other apartments to the Matty and he will not answer!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379364#msg379364


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1424 on: May 06, 2008, 02:41:59 PM »


SS…let me ask you one question…

If I post the Freddy Zedan owns the Indo/Lion’s Den are you going to just take my word for it?

 Caps posts that the Kalpoes - the father or the stepfather, he never did answer which one, according to a girl there, now own it!

You can certainly take what Caps says without questions, but I will not. So please do not repost Caps post to me....Show me the proof!

 I have read everyone of Cap’s post at least three times…each day I type out an index…you would be very surprised what you see on the third read.

All I am trying to say is what you are posting from Caps is not what he said in January!

I am 99% sure as to why he switched to the Indo apartments…the answer is in one of your last few posts…and I will leave it at that!

And yes Lala’s…I am extremely frustrated…seems we have involved just about everyone on Aruba…new names are dropped every week.…I never see Joran’s name in this thread anymore!!!!!

And everytime Caps appears we have more questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COLUMBO has a word for that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379383#msg379383


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1440 on: May 06, 2008, 06:42:17 PM »


Guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don't have to give him the benefit of the doubt just because he's Caps

All I see is a whole lot of new names and misinformation and very few facts...Giovanni, Deutekom, Bulo, Freddy that doesn't exist, odd-bods living at the kalpoes address, list of names that don't match the phone book...
 
Yes, something is going on at that pond, and we are still dealing with Aruba. I'm in total agreement with Lala's on this one, nothing will come of the pond.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379502#msg379502


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1450 on: May 06, 2008, 07:32:02 PM »


SS...A simple question as to if Deutekom was a Judge should have been answered 150 pages ago....so should the reason for him going back to the Indo/Lion's Den after he told me no to there. these are simple questions and both merit an answer!

I can't buy Cap's Dirty Hand Deutekom, because how he got to him was flawed. If he is not a Judge he wouldn't have been on that list. It is as simple as that!

There are more questions now than when Caps first started posting!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379518#msg379518


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1456 on: May 06, 2008, 11:11:21 PM »


Well I guess we are all frustrated today!

I attempted to explain to Caps at least 3 times the Judges list, and as one who tries to answer other poster’s questions, and acknowledge their posts I expected an answer on at least one of those occasions! If you have read my posts you would know that I have acknowledged that Deutekom may be a ‘Dirty Hand’ , just questioning the way he got there.

You can check my posts for this morning and see that I try to ‘share’ what I know! Have a look and see if my answer to another poster was even acknowledged!

I guess in your opinion it is OK for Caps to fire of all these questions at us, but he is not obligated to answer ours. Most of my questions to him have been about posts he has made and names like Bulo’s that we have never heard of. I have asked very few about things I am researching.

I have not asked any more from Caps than I would have asked from any other poster…back up your posts! BS on putting him in any sort of position! Not to the questions I have asked anyways.

Yes there are other theories on this thread, and I for one am sick and tired of having only one jammed down my throat.

I have read Caps posts many times and it is up to me if I go along with everything or anything he says.  Maybe it might help some if you let Caps know that it is creating problems by him dropping names with no other info….it would help a lot and certainly save some of us a lot of time….

JMHO

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379582#msg379582


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1459 on: May 06, 2008, 11:33:41 PM »


... as you said this is a discussion forum and I have reason to question things in Caps posts! Most times when I have done so I do not receive an answer or if I do it is the post of Caps I am referring to posted back to me. Sorry … to me that is not discussion.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379591#msg379591


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1467 on: May 07, 2008, 08:06:50 AM »


SS...Caps started posting in the NAH thread around mid-January. Klaas explained at the time that he had been posting on the front page previously. After 4 or 5 days Caps started posting in the Shango thread. This would have been way back in the first thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379694#msg379694


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1468 on: May 07, 2008, 09:28:28 AM »


SS… You are right. I think Caps has information that has nothing to do with Shango as well. Caps does know the corruption and the ‘dark’ side of Aruba. He knows some of the players, probably a lot.

When Caps first started posting in the forum he knew very little about the case, or so it appears from his early posts. He asked us about the family, the friends, the private plane and the pimps. He asked about the suspects and about the people such as Julia and others that continually misinformed us. He needed our help and knowledge with these pieces of the puzzle. There is nothing wrong with that, I personally have spent a lot of time and posts sharing any information I had or could find.

A lot of time it seems to me that Caps has a piece that he feels fits into a Shango/Simian/Merian post, and just makes it fit. He has the player, the corrupt official, so that is the answer to that part of the riddle.

An example of this would be ‘the yellowhammer’. We started with a yellow hummer way back in the first thread, and most disagreed back then. When it was revisited recently and many posted that they thought it was the bird, Caps said OK, we’ll go with the bird, we’ll refine and correct any errors in his interpretations. The next day, Caps posts that he doesn’t think it is the bird. Our interpretation of ‘the yellowhammer’ doesn’t fit into Cap’s deciphering of the riddle.

I find this very frustrating. To me it is not that difficult.

Thanks everyone for the input on Bulo yesterday. Pita sorry for the confusion I may have caused on the Benz site. Somehow I confused myself…Vms…sounds like a good idea…maybe clear up some loose ends like Giovanni and Bulo…

 I think I need to go and sit in the grandstand with Lala’s and the other grannies for a day or two and go back to my own research.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379700#msg379700


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1493 on: May 08, 2008, 09:33:46 AM »


This is a previous discussion about Ben VocKing. Below are 2 of Caps older posts regarding VocKing. So in February and March Caps knew who VocKing was, but not on April 25th.

Somewhere back around page 40 Caps posted a key in which he includes a pic of VocKing. You will notice that Caps refers to a picture of Voking in his response above.

Around pages 45 and 46 there is much discussion about the photo of VocKing and which is the correct one. The photo of VocKing that Caps included in his key and showed to the man who knew him very well is not of the person we determined to be VocKing.

This is why I ask questions…

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379920#msg379920


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1494 on: May 08, 2008, 09:41:12 AM »


These posts of Caps have been etched in mind since March. Another reason I ask questions.

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379922#msg379922


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1495 on: May 08, 2008, 10:12:11 AM »


Here is Cap's picture of Vocking.

Hotping...Thanks for the prayer. After the posts from last night, for the sake of harmony I have decided to refrain from posting in this thread any more.

Enjoy the Tango!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379926#msg379926


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1500 on: May 08, 2008, 11:55:52 AM
»

Vms…I have suspected from very early on from Cap’s posts who Caps really is. I did not come to this conclusion from any mailing list from ‘our friend in Aruba’. Posts over the last 24 hours have confirmed my suspicions. Not everyone is whom they appear to be…I need to walk away!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379938#msg379938


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #750 5/2 -
« Reply #936 on: May 08, 2008, 08:30:49 PM »


SS…since you bought this over from the Shango thread….there is no group attack on Caps. I have asked him to answer questions about his posts. He has not done so, on most occasions IMO. I said this morning that I would walk away. I have.

Many of my questions regarding Caps surround Ben Vocking. I posted on that this morning. Please go back and read from page 39 to page 46 of the thread. Open the links. Read Caps response very carefully and then read what I posted this morning.

I am not going to respond any further on the subject.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2819.msg380072#msg380072


++++++++


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #454 on: January 02, 2009, 11:06:23 PM »


Janet...You are like a pitbull...LOL

Nobody knows my position on this at this time...I am not ready to elaborate any more...I am Sorry.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609545;topicseen#msg609545


You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 06:35:58 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 06:39:26 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!
It begs the question that was asked earlier today: Is someone related to one of the players here influencing these people? That is why I asked people to consider when they started posting here at SM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 06:47:48 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 06:48:02 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!
It begs the question that was asked earlier today: Is someone related to one of the players here influencing these people? That is why I asked people to consider when they started posting here at SM.

Most of those who posted mostly in the Shango thread went away....I guess to CnG.
I guess they believed so strongly in what Caps had to say that they could not see
the reality of how conflicted Caps posts were.  I don't know the reasoning. ::MonkeyConfused::

Whatever they know that keeps them going, they certainly aren't telling us.
It is a secret.

I am always suspicious of posters that come in with less than 100 posts now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 06:54:32 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 06:57:53 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!
It begs the question that was asked earlier today: Is someone related to one of the players here influencing these people? That is why I asked people to consider when they started posting here at SM.

Most of those who posted mostly in the Shango thread went away....I guess to CnG.
I guess they believed so strongly in what Caps had to say that they could not see
the reality of how conflicted Caps posts were.  I don't know the reasoning. ::MonkeyConfused::

Whatever they know that keeps them going, they certainly aren't telling us.
It is a secret.

I am always suspicious of posters that come in with less than 100 posts now.
I think some of these people were more intent on solving "Shango riddles" than actually bringing Natalee home.  I don't give a spit about "Shango" --- if he really knew what happened -- he could have solved this case 4 years ago!! I have nothing but utter contempt for "Shango". I think these people "rever" Shango!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 06:59:09 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 06:59:55 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!
It begs the question that was asked earlier today: Is someone related to one of the players here influencing these people? That is why I asked people to consider when they started posting here at SM.

Most of those who posted mostly in the Shango thread went away....I guess to CnG.
I guess they believed so strongly in what Caps had to say that they could not see
the reality of how conflicted Caps posts were.  I don't know the reasoning. ::MonkeyConfused::

Whatever they know that keeps them going, they certainly aren't telling us.
It is a secret.

I am always suspicious of posters that come in with less than 100 posts now.

I have always wondered if a disinformant either (a) or (b) to stay under "radar of detection":
(a) post in softball forum(s) at SM(non-related to NH at first) to fluff post count / gain credibility through post count.
(b) post in various forums at SM (including NH). Blend in, drop tiny tid bits inconspicuously, then steer away undetected.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:01:40 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:02:14 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

To me, unknowingly deceived...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:03:26 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!
It begs the question that was asked earlier today: Is someone related to one of the players here influencing these people? That is why I asked people to consider when they started posting here at SM.

Most of those who posted mostly in the Shango thread went away....I guess to CnG.
I guess they believed so strongly in what Caps had to say that they could not see
the reality of how conflicted Caps posts were.  I don't know the reasoning. ::MonkeyConfused::

Whatever they know that keeps them going, they certainly aren't telling us.
It is a secret.

I am always suspicious of posters that come in with less than 100 posts now.

I have always wondered if a disinformant either (a) or (b) to stay under "radar of detection":
(a) post in softball forum(s) at SM(non-related to NH at first) to fluff post count / gain credibility through post count.
(b) post in various forums at SM (including NH). Blend in, drop tiny tid bits inconspicuously, then steer away undetected.

Me personally Buckshot.I think that holds validity!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 07:04:56 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

"Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them..."

Who owns the Persistence?I'm just trying to understand this.Mostly lurk so....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:05:31 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

Years and years of his experience was determined to be a liability... ::MonkeyConfused::
Therefore, a diversion was used to temporarily remove him so and avoid detection...
If that diversion was unsuccessful, another would have been readily available as PlanB to execute...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 21, 2009, 07:06:39 PM
Magnolia:
Quote
You are so right!!  Posters who were good and diligent Natalee supporters, suddenly did an
about face to support Kyle and Caps and have done all in their power to disrupt this forum.
It is like they have been hypnotized.
I was thinking the same!
It begs the question that was asked earlier today: Is someone related to one of the players here influencing these people? That is why I asked people to consider when they started posting here at SM.

Most of those who posted mostly in the Shango thread went away....I guess to CnG.
I guess they believed so strongly in what Caps had to say that they could not see
the reality of how conflicted Caps posts were.  I don't know the reasoning. ::MonkeyConfused::

Whatever they know that keeps them going, they certainly aren't telling us.
It is a secret.

I am always suspicious of posters that come in with less than 100 posts now.

I have always wondered if a disinformant either (a) or (b) to stay under "radar of detection":
(a) post in softball forum(s) at SM(non-related to NH at first) to fluff post count / gain credibility through post count.
(b) post in various forums at SM (including NH). Blend in, drop tiny tid bits inconspicuously, then steer away undetected.

You are correct.  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:06:48 PM
This may help you a little bit Tater!


klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 21, 2009, 07:09:15 PM
Thailand - Bangkok- Saturday 24-01.

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/j-1.jpg)

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/j-4.jpg)

on RTL Boulevard


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 21, 2009, 07:09:42 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

Years and years of his experience was determined to be a liability... ::MonkeyConfused::
Therefore, a diversion was used to temporarily remove him so and avoid detection...
If that diversion was unsuccessful, another would have been readily available as PlanB to execute...

You are on a roll.  They had all their plans in place.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:10:47 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

Years and years of his experience was determined to be a liability... ::MonkeyConfused::
Therefore, a diversion was used to temporarily remove him so and avoid detection...
If that diversion was unsuccessful, another would have been readily available as PlanB to execute...

You are on a roll.  They had all their plans in place.

Very sad!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:11:04 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

"Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them..."

Who owns the Persistence?I'm just trying to understand this.Mostly lurk so....


I do not know personally. I am sure someone here knows that answer.
Regardless of owner(of Persistence), big cheeses tied to the mapping project were levied access to Aruban waters in exchange for concealment of their number one priority, taking possession of a critical (and maybe final) piece of evidence.

My question: why would they allow a body to knowingly sit in their waters for so long. Instead of waiting from summer2005 until late2007/early 2008, why would they not have dove and recovered sooner, and better concealed from scrutiny.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 21, 2009, 07:13:07 PM
Thailand - Bangkok- Saturday 24-01.

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/j-1.jpg)

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/j-4.jpg)

on RTL Boulevard

Thanks Johan.  I already posted these pics back on 2/16, we discussed how Joran is with another blonde girl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:13:45 PM
Thailand - Bangkok- Saturday 24-01.

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/j-1.jpg)

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/j-4.jpg)

on RTL Boulevard

Thanks Johan.  I already posted these pics back on 2/16, we discussed how Joran is with another blonde girl.

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:14:32 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

"Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them..."

Who owns the Persistence?I'm just trying to understand this.Mostly lurk so....


I do not know personally. I am sure someone here knows that answer.
Regardless of owner(of Persistence), big cheeses tied to the mapping project were levied access to Aruban waters in exchange for concealment of their number one priority, taking possession of a critical (and maybe final) piece of evidence.

My question: why would they allow a body to knowingly sit in their waters for so long. Instead of waiting from summer2005 until late2007/early 2008, why would they not have dove and recovered sooner, and better concealed from scrutiny.

Who would a thought,after a few years,that those waters would have been searched and Natalee would have been potentially found?Me personally.I would have bet against it everyday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 07:17:48 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

"Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them..."

Who owns the Persistence?I'm just trying to understand this.Mostly lurk so....


To be fair, I do believe it is important we acknowledge that we have no actual proof whatsoever that there was any deal between Schaefer/Silvetti and any branch of the Aruban Gov't or members of the Aruban business community.

We do have circumstances that, on the surface, simply do not make sense.

We do have conflicting information given privately by Kyle Kingman, as opposed to what he said publicly on behalf of the search team.

We do have photographic evidence that was never turned over to the FBI by anyone associated with the Persistence search.

We do have questionable ethical business practices on record by Schaefer.

But as of yet, we have no proof of any deal.  None.

We do want to know if there was one. 

If there wasn't, these circumstances and information that "can't be talked about", should be explained truthfully. 

Remember, donations were given in good faith.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:17:58 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

"Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them..."

Who owns the Persistence?I'm just trying to understand this.Mostly lurk so....


I do not know personally. I am sure someone here knows that answer.
Regardless of owner(of Persistence), big cheeses tied to the mapping project were levied access to Aruban waters in exchange for concealment of their number one priority, taking possession of a critical (and maybe final) piece of evidence.

My question: why would they allow a body to knowingly sit in their waters for so long. Instead of waiting from summer2005 until late2007/early 2008, why would they not have dove and recovered sooner, and better concealed from scrutiny.

Who would a thought,after a few years,that those waters would have been searched and Natalee would have been potentially found?Me personally.I would have bet against it everyday.

Upon knowledge of whereabouts, lookouts were probably employed...
Probably got the radar working again, too.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 07:21:17 PM
Thankyou Faith...I remember Kyle posting here and I expressing my disdain about the abrupt departure but was basically shot down by others. A day or two before the departure there was a call out for more funding and then suddenly they left.We couldn't understand that.I also remember Kyle stating that he saw the Arubans over the dive site from shore days after the cage had been found.So I guess the reasoning now is that yes it was Natalee's remains in that cage?Is that what ya'll are thinking?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:22:38 PM
J2K administer date-rape drug...
Sexual (and physical) assault of Natalee occurs...
Natalee expires at hands of J2K (and others?)...
JVDS (2K) panic and call PVDS...
PVDS contacts JanVDS...
JanVDS advises / obstructs / abets for PVDS...
Outside law enforcement agencies are kept out of Aruba...
The elite of the island (illegal money schemes/activities) band together...
Tourism Board (synonymous with ALE) protects enabling interests...
Disinformants / Diversions employed by Aruba...
Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them...
Aruba owns and possesses the final piece of evidence...
They will continue to Lie and Deny to the End...

Am I close??  ::MonkeyWink::


That's pretty good BuckShot!

So where does this put Tim Miller?

Tim Miller was not aboard The Persistence on the Jan 7th Dive when the ALE dove on the cage/Trap by themselves!

"Persistence and Aruban Govt strike a (brokered) deal...
"Map in our waters" in exchange for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" near trap...
Crew members / owners cash in...Kyle almost ruins it for them..."

Who owns the Persistence?I'm just trying to understand this.Mostly lurk so....


To be fair, I do believe it is important we acknowledge that we have no actual proof whatsoever that there was any deal between Schaefer/Silvetti and any branch of the Aruban Gov't or members of the Aruban business community.

We do have circumstances that, on the surface, simply do not make sense.

We do have conflicting information given privately by Kyle Kingman, as opposed to what he said publicly on behalf of the search team.

We do have photographic evidence that was never turned over to the FBI by anyone associated with the Persistence search.

We do have questionable ethical business practices on record by Schaefer.

But as of yet, we have no proof of any deal.  None.

We do want to know if there was one. 

If there wasn't, these circumstances and information that "can't be talked about", should be explained truthfully. 

Remember, donations were given in good faith.





In different (unrelated) concealed activities, simply as a parallel for argument sake...
Drug dealers do not give recipts and file it on their taxes...

Therefore, unexplainable actions and supporting circumstantial facts may lead to the deduction that, if a deal were made, it would not be published online for public viewing. Only those who sttod to gain from the deal knew about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:25:45 PM
Thankyou Faith...I remember Kyle posting here and I expressing my disdain about the abrupt departure but was basically shot down by others. A day or two before the departure there was a call out for more funding and then suddenly they left.We couldn't understand that.I also remember Kyle stating that he saw the Arubans over the dive site from shore days after the cage had been found.So I guess the reasoning now is that yes it was Natalee's remains in that cage?Is that what ya'll are thinking?

Potentially yes!We'll never know though.Silvetti was asking for donations up until April 3rd, 2008.About a month after leaving Aruba IIRC.Feel free to ask questions.Tamikosmom should give us a post with all of Kyle's words and you can read them and draw your own conclusions.Janet.Please post Kyle's words....TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 07:33:37 PM

To be fair, I do believe it is important we acknowledge that we have no actual proof whatsoever that there was any deal between Schaefer/Silvetti and any branch of the Aruban Gov't or members of the Aruban business community.

We do have circumstances that, on the surface, simply do not make sense.

We do have conflicting information given privately by Kyle Kingman, as opposed to what he said publicly on behalf of the search team.

We do have photographic evidence that was never turned over to the FBI by anyone associated with the Persistence search.

We do have questionable ethical business practices on record by Schaefer.

But as of yet, we have no proof of any deal.  None.

We do want to know if there was one. 

If there wasn't, these circumstances and information that "can't be talked about", should be explained truthfully. 

Remember, donations were given in good faith.



In different (unrelated) concealed activities, simply as a parallel for argument sake...
Drug dealers do not give recipts and file it on their taxes...

Therefore, unexplainable actions and supporting circumstantial facts may lead to the deduction that, if a deal were made, it would not be published online for public viewing. Only those who sttod to gain from the deal knew about it.


Precisely, Buckshot. 

Which is why it seems to me that if our research is upsetting anyone, the best recourse would be the truth. 

But..."they can't talk about it right now", which might've worked had we not learned that they were keeping information from the FBI in an attempt to profit off of that information.

So...why can't they talk about it?


04/03/2008
John Silvetti:  "I will answer whatever questions that I can only that some things can not be revealed at this time." (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334982#msg334982)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:36:35 PM
To be fair, I do believe it is important we acknowledge that we have no actual proof whatsoever that there was any deal between Schaefer/Silvetti and any branch of the Aruban Gov't or members of the Aruban business community.
(this type of deal is not published online)

We do have circumstances that, on the surface, simply do not make sense. (Agreed)

We do have conflicting information given privately by Kyle Kingman, as opposed to what he said publicly on behalf of the search team. (He has been extended an offer to clarify himself many, many times)

We do have photographic evidence that was never turned over to the FBI by anyone associated with the Persistence search. (Wonder why Aruba, Prosecutor Mos have never addressed this...)

We do have questionable ethical business practices on record by Schaefer. (Agreed)

But as of yet, we have no proof of any deal.  None. (The proof will be hiiden and known by only a handful. Not to mention they have the sanctuary and protection of a nation, known for illegal special interests.)

We do want to know if there was one. (Pretty please will not reveal the deal)

If there wasn't, these circumstances and information that "can't be talked about", should be explained truthfully.
(Good luck with that. Maybe Arlene Schippers could explain that for us. Confidentiality, Might "jeopardize the investigation")  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Remember, donations were given in good faith. (Kindness was abused. Part of the scam)



No offense, but my comments are in red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 07:36:57 PM
Thankyou Faith...I remember Kyle posting here and I expressing my disdain about the abrupt departure but was basically shot down by others. A day or two before the departure there was a call out for more funding and then suddenly they left.We couldn't understand that.I also remember Kyle stating that he saw the Arubans over the dive site from shore days after the cage had been found.So I guess the reasoning now is that yes it was Natalee's remains in that cage?Is that what ya'll are thinking?

Potentially yes!We'll never know though.Silvetti was asking for donations up until April 3rd, 2008.About a month after leaving Aruba IIRC.Feel free to ask questions.Tamikosmom should give us a post with all of Kyle's words and you can read them and draw your own conclusions.Janet.Please post Kyle's words....TIA

I always thought it was Natalee but I never saw the picture of the denim material in the cage until recently here.It pretty much solidifies it for me.The sneaker is compelling too..It really upsets me for Tim..A man that does whatever he can to help others is bamboozled at every turn it seems.It's so hard to heal from something this tragic when it never ends.One fine day,justice will be served when they finally reap the whirlwind..Not a day goes by all these years later that I don't think of Beth and Dave and do my best to hold them up in my prayers.This old world is a cesspool...:(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 07:37:32 PM
Hi Tater Tot

The following are posts which Kyle Kingman submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site ... posts which Kermit brought over and posted on the SM forum with the permission of Beth Holloway.

No theory necessary ... these posts tell a story ... a story that implies that John Silvetti participated with the Arubans in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.

Please read carefully.

Janet

________


THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

John Silvetti

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
 
Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Fabric - Tarp - Vertibre - Skull

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: In my opinion that last pic from Jan 7th should be absolutely intriguing and flip your mind from what you thought you knew. In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric.

Kyle: Notice the blue fabric swayed in the current.

Kyle: The blue tarp piece was found approx 6-10 ft away from the trap opening.

Kyle:  The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle: The most likely to remain at or near it's original location was the skull, which is why I was so convinced the object pictured was a skull.

Kyle:   … John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand

Kyle:  I'm sorry if this is disturbing. I took the picture of Natalee standing on the beach and cropped, rotated, and scaled the image to correlate with the trap body form.  Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand.

Kyle: The bag that is above the denim bag looks to me as though it contains pieces of  vertebrae.

Kyle: The fabric(s?) are not visible on either the Dec 29th or 30th dives. There is about an inch of sand over the fabrics. The fabrics are completely covered. The diver sampled the sand and found the fabric underneath the sand. He then bagged the blue fabric. If the other bag contains fabric, it was also in the sand. There was also something possibly recovered from far inside the trap. In the video the diver is inside the trap with just below his knees showing. I don't know what was sampled far inside the trap if anything.

Kyle:  The contents of the trap were being actively investigated. The forensic results of a fabric sample showed the fabric sample was not a match to Natalee's blouse and that no DNA match to Natalee was found within that fabric sample. Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

Kyle:  In my opinion, the blue fabric is quite possibly Natalee's skirt. The divers found the denim where I suggested a week earlier (Dec 29th) to Tim Miller that there was likely Natalee's denim skirt under the sand.  Also in my opinion, the deni-like fabric is a match in terms of color, quantity, and structure to Natalee's skirt. It's not a lot of denim folded in the bag, but then again her skirt was rather small.

Kyle: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains.

Kyle:  … Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.
 
Kyle: The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle: In my opinion that last pic from Jan 7th should be absolutely intriguing and flip your mind from what you thought you knew.  In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric.

++++++


Kyle Kingman’s Summary

Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 07:39:56 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 07:42:58 PM
Tater

Initially Kyle Kingman was very troubled concerning what he observed on board the Persistence in regards to the recovery process.  I truly believe that Kyle felt forced into an intiminated silence by John Silvetti.

It appears that sending the ROV images to the FBI and ... requesting the Natalee's Freebirds to assist in exposing the John Silvetti deception to the FBI/Beth Holloway through a document ... Kyle Kingman was attempting to do what was right.  He was taking the high road.

However ... at some point in time he began to backtrack.  Could it have been a threatened lawsuit but Silvetti/Schaefer?  Could it have been those Network deals?  Could it have been incentives were offered in regards to furthering his career with John Silvetti?

Janet

_________


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:   I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:43:11 PM
Thank You Janet! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:49:06 PM
Tater

Initially Kyle Kingman was very troubled concerning what he observed on board the Persistence in regards to the recovery process.  I truly believe that Kyle felt forced into an intiminated silence by John Silvetti.

It appears that sending the ROV images to the FBI and ... requesting the Natalee's Freebirds to assist in exposing the John Silvetti deception to the FBI/Beth Holloway through a document ... Kyle Kingman was attempting to do what was right.  He was taking the high road.

However ... at some point in time he began to backtrack.  Could it have been a threatened lawsuit but Silvetti/Schaefer?  Could it have been those Network deals?  Could it have been incentives were offered in regards to furthering his career with John Silvetti?

Janet

_________


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:   I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:50:43 PM
Tater

Initially Kyle Kingman was very troubled concerning what he observed on board the Persistence in regards to the recovery process.  I truly believe that Kyle felt forced into an intiminated silence by John Silvetti.

It appears that sending the ROV images to the FBI and ... requesting the Natalee's Freebirds to assist in exposing the John Silvetti deception to the FBI/Beth Holloway through a document ... Kyle Kingman was attempting to do what was right.  He was taking the high road.

However ... at some point in time he began to backtrack.  Could it have been a threatened lawsuit but Silvetti/Schaefer?  Could it have been those Network deals?  Could it have been incentives were offered in regards to furthering his career with John Silvetti?

Janet

_________


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:   I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.


Says it all for me...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 07:51:37 PM
Tater

The Persistence undertaking may have been deceptively two fold ... mapping for oil and being on the lookout for a container that may hold Natalee Holloway's remains but ...  affording John Silvetti the benefit of the doubt ... I believe he went into this venture with the intention of being an active  participant in the recovery of Natalee Holloway's remains in the event of a discovery.  However, sometime between the discovery of the trap/cage and the December 30, 2008 dive, the Arubans became involved

I contend after the Arubans were made aware of the implication of the ROV images from the December 29, 2007 dive ... immediate damage control was where it was at and ... an emergency meeting was held aboard the Persistence.

I suspect that just prior to the second dive on December 30, 2007 ... an emergency meeting was scheduled by the Aruban with John Silvetti.  I speculate that at this meeting ... justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closurer for her family too a back seat and ... for an incentive ... John Silvetti became a participant in "the finale to the great Aruban coverup".  Considering Tim Trahan dove with the Aruban dive team on December 30, 2008 ... I contend that this American also became a player in the betrayal.  In otherwords ... the "thumbs down" was a given.

IMO

Janet

_____


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment.

Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle: Mr. Red shirt came on the Persistence along with Dolf, Mos, et al for the meeting on the 30th."

Kyle:   This is certainly NOT John Silvetti. I do not know this man. He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 07:55:26 PM
Tater

Initially Kyle Kingman was very troubled concerning what he observed on board the Persistence in regards to the recovery process.  I truly believe that Kyle felt forced into an intiminated silence by John Silvetti.

It appears that sending the ROV images to the FBI and ... requesting the Natalee's Freebirds to assist in exposing the John Silvetti deception to the FBI/Beth Holloway through a document ... Kyle Kingman was attempting to do what was right.  He was taking the high road.

However ... at some point in time he began to backtrack.  Could it have been a threatened lawsuit but Silvetti/Schaefer?  Could it have been those Network deals?  Could it have been incentives were offered in regards to furthering his career with John Silvetti?

Janet

_________


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:   I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.


Says it all for me...

it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.[/color]



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 07:56:01 PM

Buckshot,

No offense taken. 

I do appreciate your comments and insight.

 ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 07:58:38 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 07:58:39 PM
Tater

Initially Kyle Kingman was very troubled concerning what he observed on board the Persistence in regards to the recovery process.  I truly believe that Kyle felt forced into an intiminated silence by John Silvetti.

It appears that sending the ROV images to the FBI and ... requesting the Natalee's Freebirds to assist in exposing the John Silvetti deception to the FBI/Beth Holloway through a document ... Kyle Kingman was attempting to do what was right.  He was taking the high road.

However ... at some point in time he began to backtrack.  Could it have been a threatened lawsuit but Silvetti/Schaefer?  Could it have been those Network deals?  Could it have been incentives were offered in regards to furthering his career with John Silvetti?

Janet

_________


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:   I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.


Says it all for me...

it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.[/color]



Can you two please keep it down.I'm trying to watch TV! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 07:59:38 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 08:00:23 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 08:03:02 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I guess that question would need to be directed to the FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 08:03:24 PM
Thankyou Janet and all of you...The magnitude of all this is sickening to say the least.I'm just sick, ya know?If there was a puking monkey,I'd be using it for sure.We at least know what they did with her body but the truth of how she was murdered will always be a mystery.It's just undone and I guess that's what we all feel....undone...God rest her soul..The only thing I know for certain is she was last seen getting in the car with those three slime balls only to never be seen again but one fine day,we are all going to know the rest of the story..That is my prayer..I carry a scar on my heart and I want to know why...:(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 21, 2009, 08:03:56 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.

Dottie,

I don't have a link handy, but I do think I remember that either Kermit or Jen told us that Kyle was questioned by the FBI after the Freebirds sent the information in.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 08:04:04 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.
TY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 08:08:08 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.

Dottie,

I don't have a link handy, but I do think I remember that either Kermit or Jen told us that Kyle was questioned by the FBI after the Freebirds sent the information in.


Thank Lifesong, I just don't see how that information could be disreguarded.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:09:02 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.
TY
(not the FBI themselves).
The FBI will never comment on an on-going investigation. In fact, I'm pretty sure it was Aruba itself that told us the FBI did not make a match with the fabric sample they sent in


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 08:09:49 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT
There's a meeting tonight...up at my cabin in the backwoods ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 08:10:42 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

My opinion...
They could only test what was given to them...
They were denied "official participation" status...
This has never been/will never be a transparent investigation...

The answer and validation to this question:
"How do human remains / fabric turn into tarp material"

Is the same answer as to the following question:
"How does blood turn into chocolate"

Aruba has special "on the spot" forensic abilities...
Combined with a magic wand, that magically disappears things...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 08:11:09 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT
There's a meeting tonight...up at my cabin in the backwoods ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'll bring the laptops so we can all stack it up! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:11:15 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.
TY
(not the FBI themselves).
The FBI will never comment on an on-going investigation. In fact, I'm pretty sure it was Aruba itself that told us the FBI did not make a match with the fabric sample they sent in

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyEek::
Not sure how THAT happened!! 

It should have read:

The FBI will never comment on an on-going investigation. In fact, I'm pretty sure it was Aruba itself that told us the FBI did not make a match with the fabric sample they sent in (not the FBI themselves).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 08:15:04 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 08:18:48 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.
TY
(not the FBI themselves).
The FBI will never comment on an on-going investigation. In fact, I'm pretty sure it was Aruba itself that told us the FBI did not make a match with the fabric sample they sent in

To further elaborate, consider this scenario:
Aruba retrieved blue fabric material in a cage they were searching for in the ocean...
They send a blue tarp-like material to the FBI to be tested for a match..
The test results come back negative...
Aruba justifies to the world that the tests came back negative...
Guess so...Need the correct material to test...No brainer...
As advisors, the FBI's hands may be tied...
Their denial, early on, was deliberate and planned...
Remember...This is not amateur hour...
There are many intelligent (and well paid) authors to the corruption script...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:19:56 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 08:21:18 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT
There's a meeting tonight...up at my cabin in the backwoods ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::
Uncle Bubba and cousin Larry the Cable guy may show up too.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 08:21:44 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

My opinion...
They could only test what was given to them...
They were denied "official participation" status...
This has never been/will never be a transparent investigation...

The answer and validation to this question:
"How do human remains / fabric turn into tarp material"

Is the same answer as to the following question:
"How does blood turn into chocolate"

Aruba has special "on the spot" forensic abilities...
Combined with a magic wand, that magically disappears things...


So it would be up to the FBI to pressure the ALE and dispute their findings?  Was the fabric the only thing sent to FBI?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 08:24:47 PM

Dottie,

I don't have a link handy, but I do think I remember that either Kermit or Jen told us that Kyle was questioned by the FBI after the Freebirds sent the information in.



Yes ... Kermit did state in a post that it was the FBI who contacted Kyle Kingman and called him in for questioning after a compilation document was sent to them by the Natalee's Freebirds.

I am looking for the post.  I have it saved somewhere.  While look for this I came across the following.

Hey ... even if the words of Kyle Kingman's post were taken out of context ... they have the ability to stand alone and relate John Silvetti's participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.  However ... it was confirmed that those words were not taken out of context.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - EMAIL TO KERMIT

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »


Kyle sent me this today

Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly.  You have taken many of my posts, snipped what you wanted to put them into your context, and then shared them in a public forum.  The "public domain" notion only applies where someone has copyright ownership over the work in the first case and that ownership has lapsed. In that case, all posts can be freely reproduced by anyone, anywhere, without violating copyright law. However, this is clearly not the case.

I will state this with absolute clarity so there is no misunderstanding:
I have confirmed with the FBI on multiple instances that they have had possession of the ROV videos since very early on. I personally didn't send the ROV footage to them because another project lead had already at the first opportunity while we were still in Aruba. I sent all of the ROV screen shots directly to the FBI the day they were acquired.

I also got confirmation back in February by Tim Trahan who was in constant contact with Beth during the search that she indeed had all the information including the statements and has seen the ROV videos. I personally confirmed all of this with the senior FBI agent in charge of the investigation as well as given him my personal account of all that I witnessed and knew. They have this on record.  Birmingham is not the office in charge.
 
The information you have been spreading is not only inaccurate and a violation of a non-disclosure, it is slanderous and spreading misinformation. The damage it has done to my professional relationship with J. Silvetti is incalculable which has a direct effect on my ability to provide for my family, which includes my daughter named after Natalee.
 
I have neither publicly responded to your provocative antics, or retaliated with personal attacks in response to yours. I also have never threatened you as you publicly claimed.
 
I recently asked the senior FBI agent in charge how I should handle this situation which you have incited.   I thought his response was terrific. He replied: "Just sit back and keep quiet.  Kermit doesn't matter".  

So this is exactly what I've done. I wrote this letter to you as a gesture of courtesy in hopes it would save you from further embarrassment from those who actually know something about this case.  I'm not referring to myself, rather the family and lead investigators who are out legitimately investigating this case in pursuit of justice right to the top.
 
Sincerely,
 Kyle

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482


klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »


Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.

At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.

The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 08:24:55 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:27:16 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 08:28:27 PM
Kyle

"I recently asked the senior FBI agent in charge how I should handle this situation which you have incited.   I thought his response was terrific. He replied: "Just sit back and keep quiet.  Kermit doesn't matter".

Kyle's worried about a Muppet! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 08:29:05 PM
Klaas ... mods

Could somebody please highlight in red the following portion of Kyle Kingman's email to Kermit in my previous post.

I personally confirmed all of this with the senior FBI agent in charge of the investigation as well as given him my personal account of all that I witnessed and knew. They have this on record.  Birmingham is not the office in charge.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:29:30 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 08:30:42 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

My opinion...
They could only test what was given to them...
They were denied "official participation" status...
This has never been/will never be a transparent investigation...

The answer and validation to this question:
"How do human remains / fabric turn into tarp material"

Is the same answer as to the following question:
"How does blood turn into chocolate"

Aruba has special "on the spot" forensic abilities...
Combined with a magic wand, that magically disappears things...


So it would be up to the FBI to pressure the ALE and dispute their findings?  Was the fabric the only thing sent to FBI?

Sounds good...But give me your thoughts on how that would be accomplished...
According to Aruba, this is an active investigation...
They are still trying to exhaust all avenues in this case...
Only one problem, though...
The lead prosecutor is set to step down from his position...
Another will take his place and have to be re-acquainted with the case...
Is this well-timed or coincidental? You be the judge...
Nothing new @ SM...Nothing is a surprise...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 08:31:09 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Great eyes Wreck!Onw would think you'd be flying the American flag?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 08:31:10 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

Thankyou Wreck.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tater on February 21, 2009, 08:35:06 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Fitting for a turn coat..:(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 08:37:02 PM
Kyle

"I recently asked the senior FBI agent in charge how I should handle this situation which you have incited.   I thought his response was terrific. He replied: "Just sit back and keep quiet.  Kermit doesn't matter".

Kyle's worried about a Muppet! ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle ... you just do not get it.

it was not not Kermit who incited anything.  It was your words that exposed John Silvetti's betrayal to Natalee Holloway and her family.

Take personal responsibility.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: dottie on February 21, 2009, 08:39:40 PM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

My opinion...
They could only test what was given to them...
They were denied "official participation" status...
This has never been/will never be a transparent investigation...

The answer and validation to this question:
"How do human remains / fabric turn into tarp material"

Is the same answer as to the following question:
"How does blood turn into chocolate"

Aruba has special "on the spot" forensic abilities...
Combined with a magic wand, that magically disappears things...


So it would be up to the FBI to pressure the ALE and dispute their findings?  Was the fabric the only thing sent to FBI?

Sounds good...But give me your thoughts on how that would be accomplished...
According to Aruba, this is an active investigation...
They are still trying to exhaust all avenues in this case...
Only one problem, though...
The lead prosecutor is set to step down from his position...
Another will take his place and have to be re-acquainted with the case...
Is this well-timed or coincidental? You be the judge...
Nothing new @ SM...Nothing is a surprise...

Thanks for all the info...things are much clearer now. All the work that has been done here is amazing!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 08:43:00 PM
Kyle

"I recently asked the senior FBI agent in charge how I should handle this situation which you have incited.   I thought his response was terrific. He replied: "Just sit back and keep quiet.  Kermit doesn't matter".

Kyle's worried about a Muppet! ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle ... you just do not get it.

it was not not Kermit who incited anything.  It was your words that exposed John Silvetti's betrayal to Natalee Holloway and her family.

Take personal responsibility.

Janet

He still doesn't understand that the FBI doesn't care about Kermit.They are concerned with what was done out in those waters!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 08:44:03 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Great eyes Wreck!Onw would think you'd be flying the American flag?
I don't like seeing the aruba flag on the persistence, but...
It is traditionally accepted to fly the Host nation's flag while in there territorial waters.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/Seaflags/customs/law.html#foreign

Foreign Flags on U.S. Ships
Courtesy Ensigns

Many countries require either as a matter law or of customary practice that foreign vessels in their territorial waters display the host country's flag.  This flag is known as a "courtesy ensign."  When a host country has a merchant ensign that differs from its national flag used ashore, it is the merchant ensign that is displayed as the courtesy ensign.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 08:46:35 PM

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Why am I not surprised?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

The chain of custody of the contents of the trap/cage which involved only Arubas ... tells me where John Silvetti was bowing to.  The flying of the Aruban flag was very fitting.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 21, 2009, 08:48:24 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Great eyes Wreck!Onw would think you'd be flying the American flag?
I don't like seeing the aruba flag on the persistence, but...
It is traditionally accepted to fly the Host nation's flag while in there territorial waters.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/Seaflags/customs/law.html#foreign

Foreign Flags on U.S. Ships
Courtesy Ensigns

Many countries require either as a matter law or of customary practice that foreign vessels in their territorial waters display the host country's flag.  This flag is known as a "courtesy ensign."  When a host country has a merchant ensign that differs from its national flag used ashore, it is the merchant ensign that is displayed as the courtesy ensign.

Yes it is BillB.Even then i would have peed on it before i put it up! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 08:50:17 PM

I don't like seeing the aruba flag on the persistence, but...
It is traditionally accepted to fly the Host nation's flag while in there territorial waters.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/Seaflags/customs/law.html#foreign

Foreign Flags on U.S. Ships
Courtesy Ensigns

Many countries require either as a matter law or of customary practice that foreign vessels in their territorial waters display the host country's flag.  This flag is known as a "courtesy ensign."  When a host country has a merchant ensign that differs from its national flag used ashore, it is the merchant ensign that is displayed as the courtesy ensign.

Hi billb

You are correct.  When hubby takes our boat into American waters the American flag flies along with the Canadian flag.  There is not one American who see our boat does not recognize that proud Canadians are on board.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:51:25 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Great eyes Wreck!Onw would think you'd be flying the American flag?
I don't like seeing the aruba flag on the persistence, but...
It is traditionally accepted to fly the Host nation's flag while in there territorial waters.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/Seaflags/customs/law.html#foreign

Foreign Flags on U.S. Ships
Courtesy Ensigns

Many countries require either as a matter law or of customary practice that foreign vessels in their territorial waters display the host country's flag.  This flag is known as a "courtesy ensign."  When a host country has a merchant ensign that differs from its national flag used ashore, it is the merchant ensign that is displayed as the courtesy ensign.
From that same page:
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 21, 2009, 08:56:12 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Great eyes Wreck!Onw would think you'd be flying the American flag?
I don't like seeing the aruba flag on the persistence, but...
It is traditionally accepted to fly the Host nation's flag while in there territorial waters.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/Seaflags/customs/law.html#foreign

Foreign Flags on U.S. Ships
Courtesy Ensigns

Many countries require either as a matter law or of customary practice that foreign vessels in their territorial waters display the host country's flag.  This flag is known as a "courtesy ensign."  When a host country has a merchant ensign that differs from its national flag used ashore, it is the merchant ensign that is displayed as the courtesy ensign.

Yes it is BillB.Even then i would have peed on it before i put it up! ::MonkeyCool::

Then it could have AIRED out in Aruba's famous tradewinds...
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 08:57:39 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
[/color]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 08:59:28 PM
Would someone please post a picture of this John Silvetti?Is it one of these guys? TIA

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

I do not see Silvetti in any pic. The author of the journal (Hodges) is shown with Tim Miller. The author only mentions the Silvetti group as the owner of the Persistence.

This one?http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg
Yes.

http://www.blogvandaag.nl/data/media//db_images/big/38171.jpg

I just noticed in that pic -- the Persistence is flying the Aruban flag. Is that proper for an American ship???

Great eyes Wreck!Onw would think you'd be flying the American flag?
I don't like seeing the aruba flag on the persistence, but...
It is traditionally accepted to fly the Host nation's flag while in there territorial waters.
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeohzt4/Seaflags/customs/law.html#foreign

Foreign Flags on U.S. Ships
Courtesy Ensigns

Many countries require either as a matter law or of customary practice that foreign vessels in their territorial waters display the host country's flag.  This flag is known as a "courtesy ensign."  When a host country has a merchant ensign that differs from its national flag used ashore, it is the merchant ensign that is displayed as the courtesy ensign.
From that same page:
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.

Wreck,
At the risk of displaying my addiction once again (stackaholism  ::MonkeyCool::)
I noted what you just posted as part of the link I posted. I wasn't trying to be misleading; the persistence does not fall into the category of warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels....
I would suspect that the US Flag is displayed above the aruban flag, probably higher up than the picture shows...
Still makes me mad though that persistence displayed the aruban flag...tradition be damned in this case...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 09:03:08 PM
Sorry if I got you all off topic....carry on please... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:03:50 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 09:08:01 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:11:56 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:13:55 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
I mean't "Vessel" instead of "vehicle"  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 09:15:56 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
US Public vessel is owned by, or operated by, US govt...warships, coast guard, merchant marines...
I believe persistence is a "private vessel" and that's why I pulled out the link...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 09:19:21 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
US Public vessel is owned by, or operated by, US govt...warships, coast guard, merchant marines...
I believe persistence is a "private vessel" and that's why I pulled out the link...

The Persistence is a privately owned Research Vessel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:20:31 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
US Public vessel is owned by, or operated by, US govt...warships, coast guard, merchant marines...
I believe persistence is a "private vessel" and that's why I pulled out the link...
Well, I don't like it either!! So, US owned cruise ships fly foreign flags in each different port they go to???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:23:01 PM
Did the SS Minnow have to fly a Gilligan flag?  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 21, 2009, 09:24:09 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
US Public vessel is owned by, or operated by, US govt...warships, coast guard, merchant marines...
I believe persistence is a "private vessel" and that's why I pulled out the link...
Well, I don't like it either!! So, US owned cruise ships fly foreign flags in each different port they go to???

The Persistence should have flown the Skull and Crossbones.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 09:27:43 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
US Public vessel is owned by, or operated by, US govt...warships, coast guard, merchant marines...
I believe persistence is a "private vessel" and that's why I pulled out the link...
Well, I don't like it either!! So, US owned cruise ships fly foreign flags in each different port they go to???
I don't like it either in the persistence case under the circumstances that are emerging regarding the principles' roles in possibly denying Justice for Natalee and the return of her remains to her family.
Us owned cruise ships are considered private vessels, as they are not owned by, nor operated by US govt personnel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 21, 2009, 09:29:17 PM
Quote
U.S. policy is that public vessels, including warships as well as civilian-manned ships belonging to the Military Sealift Command and other U.S. government vessels, enjoy sovereign immune status, that they are exempt from the jurisdiction of any other state.  Because complying with a coastal state's regulations purporting to require the display of its flag in its waters or ports could be construed as an admission that the U.S. public vessel is subject to the coastal state's jurisdiction, all U.S. public vessels are forbidden from flying courtesy ensigns.
I respectfully disagree -- I read this as pertaining to all US public vessels.
No worries....I just think persistence was following a tradition wrt flying the aruban flag, in the spirit of cooperation...mhoo
I still don't endorse it in this case.....
::MonkeyConfused::
Now I might be back on your side! Is the Persistence a "public vessel" or perhaps a "private vessel"? Is a cruise ship a "public vehicle" or a "private vehicle"??  ::MonkeyConfused::
US Public vessel is owned by, or operated by, US govt...warships, coast guard, merchant marines...
I believe persistence is a "private vessel" and that's why I pulled out the link...
Well, I don't like it either!! So, US owned cruise ships fly foreign flags in each different port they go to???

The Persistence should have flown the Skull and Crossbones.
good one! The "Jolly Roger"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: always 1 on February 21, 2009, 09:48:33 PM
Did the SS Minnow have to fly a Gilligan flag?  ::MonkeyCool::
     ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 10:09:02 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 10:16:03 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Janet...Your not saying that "stackaholism" is NOT part of the seven steps of the addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... ::MonkeyWaa::
Once I licked that, I thought I'd move on...... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 10:20:44 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Janet...Your not saying that "stackaholism" is NOT part of the seven steps of the addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... ::MonkeyWaa::
Once I licked that, I thought I'd move on...... ::MonkeyCool::
"move on" does not mean I'm no longer looking for Justice for Natalee...
It just means I'm moving to the next step in the 7 step program... ::MonkeyCool::
Like Beth, God willing, I'll support her for the next 40 years if necessary!
Bank on That....aruba.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 10:22:55 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Janet...Your not saying that "stackaholism" is NOT part of the seven steps of the addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... ::MonkeyWaa::
Once I licked that, I thought I'd move on...... ::MonkeyCool::

Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   ::MonkeyCool::
"move on" does not mean I'm no longer looking for Justice for Natalee...
It just means I'm moving to the next step in the 7 step program... ::MonkeyCool::
Like Beth, God willing, I'll support her for the next 40 years if necessary!
Bank on That....aruba.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 10:24:59 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Janet...Your not saying that "stackaholism" is NOT part of the seven steps of the addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... ::MonkeyWaa::
Once I licked that, I thought I'd move on...... ::MonkeyCool::

"move on" does not mean I'm no longer looking for Justice for Natalee...
It just means I'm moving to the next step in the 7 step program... ::MonkeyCool::
Like Beth, God willing, I'll support her for the next 40 years if necessary!
Bank on That....aruba.....
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   ::MonkeyCool::


And if my curser doesn't quit jumping and letting me get sucked up in the quote stacks I'm going to scream!!!!   ::MonkeyWaa::

It's all billb's fault!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 10:26:02 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Janet...Your not saying that "stackaholism" is NOT part of the seven steps of the addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... ::MonkeyWaa::
Once I licked that, I thought I'd move on...... ::MonkeyCool::

Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   ::MonkeyCool::
"move on" does not mean I'm no longer looking for Justice for Natalee...
It just means I'm moving to the next step in the 7 step program... ::MonkeyCool::
Like Beth, God willing, I'll support her for the next 40 years if necessary!
Bank on That....aruba.....

TM....looks pretty bad.. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 10:27:38 PM
Tamikosmom -

We(I) had better join stackaholics anonymous...

BUCKSHOT

After I have gone through the seven step program in regards to my addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... I will then join ya.

First things first.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Janet...Your not saying that "stackaholism" is NOT part of the seven steps of the addiction to the Natalee Holloway case ... ::MonkeyWaa::
Once I licked that, I thought I'd move on...... ::MonkeyCool::

Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   ::MonkeyCool::
"move on" does not mean I'm no longer looking for Justice for Natalee...
It just means I'm moving to the next step in the 7 step program... ::MonkeyCool::
Like Beth, God willing, I'll support her for the next 40 years if necessary!
Bank on That....aruba.....

TM....looks pretty bad.. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!   ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 10:29:55 PM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 10:32:58 PM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 21, 2009, 10:36:06 PM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF provided the laptops.....just so we can connect the dots... (he's at the cabin now.....not sure what he's doing...I'm here)....::MonkeyCool::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 10:45:20 PM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF provided the laptops.....just so we can connect the dots... (he's at the cabin now.....not sure what he's doing...I'm here)....::MonkeyCool::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

 Hopefully he's connecting some more dots and will report in later!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 21, 2009, 10:45:57 PM
Well ... youngest son and wife took my eldest grandsons (9/10) to a movIe and MacDonald's this afternoon and ... just brought them back now.

The kids are going to have a game of Scrabble with me.  However ... they agreed under duress.  I am not kidding.  When I asked if they would have a game with me the eldest said "How much is it worth Mama".  Cheeky kid!  I told him ... the trip to Vancouver Island that Papa and I are taking him and his brother on in the middle of March was in the balance.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

The playing field is evened out because the kids get to use the Scrabble dictionary.

Hubby is still attempting to get through that book authored by his sister about the Japanese 103 year history in Western British Columbia.  He made a decision to read a few chapters this evening.

Anyways ... I am off.

Good Night Monkeys!!  Good Night Zookeepers!!

Janet
7:45 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 21, 2009, 11:28:12 PM
Well ... youngest son and wife took my eldest grandsons (9/10) to a movIe and MacDonald's this afternoon and ... just brought them back now.

The kids are going to have a game of Scrabble with me.  However ... they agreed under duress.  I am not kidding.  When I asked if they would have a game with me the eldest said "How much is it worth Mama".  Cheeky kid!  I told him ... the trip to Vancouver Island that Papa and I are taking him and his brother on in the middle of March was in the balance.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

The playing field is evened out because the kids get to use the Scrabble dictionary.

Hubby is still attempting to get through that book authored by his sister about the Japanese 103 year history in Western British Columbia.  He made a decision to read a few chapters this evening.

Anyways ... I am off.

Good Night Monkeys!!  Good Night Zookeepers!!

Janet
7:45 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 22, 2009, 12:03:24 AM
Good Evening, Monkeys!

Have been busy reading back and catching up on today's postings.

Lifesong, your Timeline is coming along well.  Keep up the good work.'

Also wanted to comment that at the time I believe we determined that it was State Dept representatives using the plane that Chaney sometimes used as Air Force 2 and they were in Aruba attending some sort of environmental summit.

Can't see Chaney doing grunt work for Halliburton in between heart attacks at his age.

I would also like to point out that no one made Kyle post and say all those things.  Posters generally did not even know to ask questions about them with the possible exception of PI.  Their context is self-evident  and there is not other way for his words to be taken. 

And as for his being a poor naive soul who did not realize something could be posted outside of a private forum, he knew full well that it could having seen the photos posted by Robin in hidey hole all over the internet promptly.

And while I don't know if Natalee was in the trap or not, the reason I don't know is that ALE and ALE alone was allowed to retrieve whatever they wanted to from the trap.

Given the history of ALE, I can't understand why this is not a major concern for anybody wanting justice for Natalee.


Guess they could have said donkey bones again but then how would they ever explain one in a fish trap.  Still, that would be on the level of the other tales they have expected us to believe.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 12:57:09 AM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF provided the laptops.....just so we can connect the dots... (he's at the cabin now.....not sure what he's doing...I'm here)....::MonkeyCool::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sorryy BillB.Forgot to say goodbye and log out!After a University of Washinton victory over Southern Cal in Basketball decided to get some Calzone and pizza at the best joint near the university with Girlfriend,daughter and brother.Great UW spot as well as best Calzone!Sitten to watch Body of lies with Crowe and dicaprio then will jump on for some research...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 12:58:06 AM



                               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 22, 2009, 01:00:34 AM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF provided the laptops.....just so we can connect the dots... (he's at the cabin now.....not sure what he's doing...I'm here)....::MonkeyCool::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sorryy BillB.Forgot to say goodbye and log out!After a University of Washinton victory over Southern Cal in Basketball decided to get some Calzone and pizza at the best joint near the university with Girlfriend,daughter and brother.Great UW spot as well as best Calzone!Sitten to watch Body of lies with Crowe and dicaprio then will jump on for some research...
KTF...you the man! (I say that with conviction!).... ::MonkeyCool::
March Madness is almost here! Go Buckeyes!
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 22, 2009, 01:08:38 AM
Good Night Lifesong, 2NJSons_Mom, Magnolia and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
Justice for Natalee is where it's at!
billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 22, 2009, 01:27:23 AM



                               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

This is the topic.  Carry on, Monkeys. 

G'nite, all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 01:44:43 AM



                               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

This is the topic.  Carry on, Monkeys. 

G'nite, all.
Good Night 2NJ!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 01:45:26 AM



                               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

This is the topic.  Carry on, Monkeys. 

G'nite, all.

Goodnight 2NJ!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 01:58:47 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 01:59:29 AM



Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 02:09:41 AM
Regarding the Donations Request in April 2008 by Louis Schaefer

Search for Natalee Holloway
PO Box 948
Kemah Tx 77565

I have Found two companies that have used this address...exactly when this was their address I have no idea....

Vlasak Holdings Inc and Bay Financial Services both at some point in time used the Po Box 948 in Kemah Tx....

There is a Chad Vlasak named as the Registered Agent and a Mona Vlasak named as Director of Vlasak Holdings Inc


Bay Financial Services Inc was also listed as using this same PO Box in Kemah Tx
Michael John Jones is the Registered Agent of this company along with Connie J Jones as Officer

Both Companies are also both associated with the address

112 Del Mar
Kemah Tx 77565

I found no connection between Schaefer or Silvetti with this two companies...I'm not saying that there are no connections its just that I have not found them....  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 03:13:22 AM
TM....looks pretty bad..
Hi my name is texasmom, and I have a dual addiction too!  NataleeHollowayCaseoholic/stackoholic.   

You and my computer are in it together, I just know it!     

Yep...with the laptops we have up in my cabin in the backwoods..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF provided the laptops.....just so we can connect the dots... (he's at the cabin now.....not sure what he's doing...I'm here)....::MonkeyCool::
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sorryy BillB.Forgot to say goodbye and log out!After a University of Washinton victory over Southern Cal in Basketball decided to get some Calzone and pizza at the best joint near the university with Girlfriend,daughter and brother.Great UW spot as well as best Calzone!Sitten to watch Body of lies with Crowe and dicaprio then will jump on for some research...
KTF...you the man! (I say that with conviction!).... ::MonkeyCool::
March Madness is almost here! Go Buckeyes!
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

March madness just around the corner!Our team is as Forrest's mom says.We're like a box of chocolate's.You never know what your gonna get! ::MonkeyHaHa:: In regards to Natalee Holloway and the JUSTICE she deserve's.I'll be here to kick some dirt over the perps!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 03:15:25 AM



                               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

This is the topic.  Carry on, Monkeys. 

G'nite, all.

YES IT IS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: finngirl on February 22, 2009, 03:25:06 AM

I often teased finbar re his paranoya
but I also know that SS' keen interest
in researching his location/background
violated his comfort level ...
which, in great part, led to his departure from SM

re the codetalker forum:
please don't paint all who participated there
w/ the same broad brush

many of us didn't believe/didn't trust Caps
from the very beginning
but we were outnumbered by those who did ...
and they froze us out

re simian/shango:
1. sim defended ALE/the eiland
2. what part of shango didn't/doesn't make sense:

a young woman drugged/abused/videotaped?
corruption/collusion/a poorly conducted investigation?
cronyism involving men who protected themselves/their sons?
motives disregarded/evidence hidden and/or destroyed?
all of which produced a successful coverup?


strip away the allegory/metaphor/symbolism and you'll find
that shango said what we believe to this day

I make no excuses for shango posting in a forum
rather than coming forward publicly,
but let's stand that assumption on its head:

we have no way of knowing whether or not shango DID try
but it led nowhere ... hmmmm?
perhaps shango tried the forum route
after having no success as a tipster to ALE


I guess I prefer to think that one person coming forward
would have served no purpose/accomplished nothing,
in light of the power held by the responsible parties

unfortunately, sometimes David cannot slay Goliath



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 03:52:36 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!


                               THE POWER OF ONE GIRL


                                           ARUBA
                                     
                                       TWO WORDS

                ................. NATALEE HOLLOWAY....................


                             GOODNIGHT AND GOD BLESS
                                      KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 22, 2009, 05:19:21 AM

(http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/daily/2009/2/22/TE/TE-TT_2S_20090222_S14/articles/TE-TT_2S_20090222_14_91_1_thumb.jpg)

Last week I traveled through the Caribbean. I went to Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten and Aruba. On the island drive the cars around the plate with the inscription "One Happy Island." This cheerful motto does not apply to the Dutch investigators in Aruba. The relationships between a number of ringleaders to police and prosecutors and the Aruban government is not tropical warm. Crucial role in the icy relations plays Justice Minister Rudy Croes, behind each tree is an enemy. It is a little disrespectful that Aruban Minister projectile launched an example, but the man has been involved in many incidents that I still aandurf qualification. Croes I met for the first time in the nineties. He had just turned minister and a very suspicious man. Even members of his own cabinet he trusted no meter. The interview with him took the prominent front page of this newspaper. He advocated the Aruban government to a cocaine test subjects. In the same period saw the Croes chance Zwinkels Dutch Attorney-General of the island to hunt. Zwinkels was closely involved in new legislation which allowed Aruban drug traffickers to supply the U.S.. The minister saw it as a kind of conspiracy of the Netherlands and the United States against the island. Years later I ran again Croes against the body, this time on one of the beautiful beaches of Aruba. It was a few weeks after the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire American press pulls out, including the famous talk show host Geraldo. It was quite embarrassing how Croes but Geraldo turned around and finally begged for a photograph of him with the television star.

Croes recently came back into the news because he is a former police chief Jan van der Straten schoffeerde, MP Hero Brinkman a slap on his face "and wanted to give the newly appointed Dutch Prosecutor Hans Mos sent home. The latter was the victim of Croes' latest conspiracy theory, that the Dutch intelligence service AIVD Aruban government would spy. Croes received confidential information from the Dutch Representation in Aruba owned. In the leaked report would incriminating statements about Oduber Prime Minister, ministers and a member of Croes. Actually, I hope that the almost pathological suspicion of Croes this once justified. It is a reassuring thought that the Netherlands is the dark side of the minister and some other Aruban politicians into the monitor.

telegraaf


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wingnut on February 22, 2009, 05:29:32 AM

I have been reading along trying to figure out what was going on in aruba and it has ben very confusing.  I think I finally understand what may have happened. My question now is what was the response by the FBI after this information was presented to them?
No response????? Should I not be asking questions...I'll move along?

I'm currently not aware of a response Dottie.

Dottie,

I don't have a link handy, but I do think I remember that either Kermit or Jen told us that Kyle was questioned by the FBI after the Freebirds sent the information in.




Yes, that is my understanding.  There never was a response from the FBI when Jen sent the photos to them - and I wouldn't have expected one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 22, 2009, 07:56:34 AM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/natjustice.jpg) AGAIN AND AGAIN  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 09:24:55 AM

I often teased finbar re his paranoya
but I also know that SS' keen interest
in researching his location/background
violated his comfort level ...
which, in great part, led to his departure from SM

re the codetalker forum:
please don't paint all who participated there
w/ the same broad brush

many of us didn't believe/didn't trust Caps
from the very beginning
but we were outnumbered by those who did ...
and they froze us out

re simian/shango:
1. sim defended ALE/the eiland
2. what part of shango didn't/doesn't make sense:

a young woman drugged/abused/videotaped?
corruption/collusion/a poorly conducted investigation?
cronyism involving men who protected themselves/their sons?
motives disregarded/evidence hidden and/or destroyed?
all of which produced a successful coverup?


strip away the allegory/metaphor/symbolism and you'll find
that shango said what we believe to this day

I make no excuses for shango posting in a forum
rather than coming forward publicly,
but let's stand that assumption on its head:

we have no way of knowing whether or not shango DID try
but it led nowhere ... hmmmm?
perhaps shango tried the forum route
after having no success as a tipster to ALE


I guess I prefer to think that one person coming forward
would have served no purpose/accomplished nothing,
in light of the power held by the responsible parties
unfortunately, sometimes David cannot slay Goliath



After almost four years and all that's transpired, you could very well be right Fingirl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 09:26:38 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!


                               THE POWER OF ONE GIRL


                                           ARUBA
                                     
                                       TWO WORDS

                ................. NATALEE HOLLOWAY....................


                             GOODNIGHT AND GOD BLESS
                                      KEEPTHEFAITH

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 09:29:00 AM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/natjustice.jpg) AGAIN AND AGAIN  ::MonkeyCool::

Hopefully everyone attending the travel show in Boston this weekend will have all seen these words!  ::MonkeyDance::

Have a great day Monkeys!

TM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 22, 2009, 09:45:48 AM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Politics/WildersnaarUSA.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 12:27:21 PM
Good Morning Everyone!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 22, 2009, 12:29:51 PM

(http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/daily/2009/2/22/TE/TE-TT_2S_20090222_S14/articles/TE-TT_2S_20090222_14_91_1_thumb.jpg)

Last week I traveled through the Caribbean. I went to Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten and Aruba. On the island drive the cars around the plate with the inscription "One Happy Island." This cheerful motto does not apply to the Dutch investigators in Aruba. The relationships between a number of ringleaders to police and prosecutors and the Aruban government is not tropical warm. Crucial role in the icy relations plays Justice Minister Rudy Croes, behind each tree is an enemy. It is a little disrespectful that Aruban Minister projectile launched an example, but the man has been involved in many incidents that I still aandurf qualification. Croes I met for the first time in the nineties. He had just turned minister and a very suspicious man. Even members of his own cabinet he trusted no meter. The interview with him took the prominent front page of this newspaper. He advocated the Aruban government to a cocaine test subjects. In the same period saw the Croes chance Zwinkels Dutch Attorney-General of the island to hunt. Zwinkels was closely involved in new legislation which allowed Aruban drug traffickers to supply the U.S.. The minister saw it as a kind of conspiracy of the Netherlands and the United States against the island. Years later I ran again Croes against the body, this time on one of the beautiful beaches of Aruba. It was a few weeks after the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire American press pulls out, including the famous talk show host Geraldo. It was quite embarrassing how Croes but Geraldo turned around and finally begged for a photograph of him with the television star.

Croes recently came back into the news because he is a former police chief Jan van der Straten schoffeerde, MP Hero Brinkman a slap on his face "and wanted to give the newly appointed Dutch Prosecutor Hans Mos sent home. The latter was the victim of Croes' latest conspiracy theory, that the Dutch intelligence service AIVD Aruban government would spy. Croes received confidential information from the Dutch Representation in Aruba owned. In the leaked report would incriminating statements about Oduber Prime Minister, ministers and a member of Croes. Actually, I hope that the almost pathological suspicion of Croes this once justified. It is a reassuring thought that the Netherlands is the dark side of the minister and some other Aruban politicians into the monitor.

telegraaf

when you post something.
can you provide a source link with it.
i would like to read the original article in Dutch.
of course i can find it after a short search, but to include the link is just a bit easier


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 22, 2009, 12:35:29 PM
Good Morning Everyone!  ::MonkeyCool::

Hi, Hotping.  Thanks for the info on the Kemah PO Box.

Caesu,  Good advice to Johan555.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 12:42:09 PM
Good Morning Everyone!  ::MonkeyCool::

Hi, Hotping.  Thanks for the info on the Kemah PO Box.

Caesu,  Good advice to Johan555.  Thanks.
Hi 2NJ....On the Kemah PO Box...I'm still trying to connect some dots but nothing so far.... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 22, 2009, 01:02:31 PM
Good Morning Everyone!  ::MonkeyCool::

Good Morning Hotping and other Monkeys ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 22, 2009, 01:16:54 PM

I often teased finbar re his paranoya
but I also know that SS' keen interest
in researching his location/background
violated his comfort level ...
which, in great part, led to his departure from SM

re the codetalker forum:
please don't paint all who participated there
w/ the same broad brush


many of us didn't believe/didn't trust Caps
from the very beginning
but we were outnumbered by those who did ...
and they froze us out


re simian/shango:
1. sim defended ALE/the eiland
2. what part of shango didn't/doesn't make sense:

a young woman drugged/abused/videotaped?
corruption/collusion/a poorly conducted investigation?
cronyism involving men who protected themselves/their sons?
motives disregarded/evidence hidden and/or destroyed?
all of which produced a successful coverup?


strip away the allegory/metaphor/symbolism and you'll find
that shango said what we believe to this day

I make no excuses for shango posting in a forum
rather than coming forward publicly,
but let's stand that assumption on its head:

we have no way of knowing whether or not shango DID try
but it led nowhere ... hmmmm?
perhaps shango tried the forum route
after having no success as a tipster to ALE


I guess I prefer to think that one person coming forward
would have served no purpose/accomplished nothing,
in light of the power held by the responsible parties

unfortunately, sometimes David cannot slay Goliath


I don't paint people with the same brush just because they posted in the same thread with certain individuals.

I agree that you were probably bullied by certain people.  I think we all know who those particular individuals were.

Glad you stuck around and continue to post and did not give up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 22, 2009, 01:19:35 PM
Good Morning Everyone!  ::MonkeyCool::

Hi, Hotping.  Thanks for the info on the Kemah PO Box.

Caesu,  Good advice to Johan555.  Thanks.
Hi 2NJ....On the Kemah PO Box...I'm still trying to connect some dots but nothing so far.... ::MonkeyEek::

Haven't connected any dots, either.  Found a Chad who is a financial advisor with Ameriprise and a Mona who is a vetinarian in TX.  Here are a couple links for Chad.

http://www.ameripriseadvisors.com/chad.e.vlasak/

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/chad/vlasak


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 01:41:06 PM
Good Morning Monkey's!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 01:41:39 PM
Good Morning Monkey's!

As well as Good afternoon for the Eastcoast Monkey's..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: SuzieQ on February 22, 2009, 02:28:53 PM
A couple of articles on Allen Stantford.

http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/news-14420--4-4--.html

Antigua seizes control of Stanford units, ECCB seizes Bank of Antigua

 
Published on Saturday, February 21, 2009

ST JOHN'S, Antigua (Reuters): Antigua and Barbuda appointed a receiver on Friday to take control of the bank and a trust company operated by Texas billionaire Allen Stanford in the Caribbean nation, authorities said.

An official statement said agents from the receiver were "currently on site in Antigua to take control of the entities," which it named as Stanford International Bank Ltd and Stanford Trust Company Ltd.

Also on Friday, the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB) said it was assuming control of the Bank of Antigua, a commercial bank in the Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda controlled by Stanford.

The central bank took the action following "an unusual and substantial withdrawal of funds," the bank said in a written statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: SuzieQ on February 22, 2009, 02:32:34 PM
http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/news-14421--14-14--.html


Stanford's whereabouts: again a mystery

 
Published on Saturday, February 21, 2009

By Jim Wolf

FREDERICKSBURG, Virginia (Reuters): The whereabouts of embattled Texas financier Allen Stanford were a mystery again Friday after the FBI served him a formal complaint in this historic hub noted for ghost stories.

Television crews maintained a vigil outside the family home of a woman reputed to be a girlfriend of Stanford, but there were no signs that he was at the house overnight. Lights were out from early evening.

 
Allen Stanford. AFP PHOTO
The modest, three-story, brick-faced townhome belongs to relatives of Andrea Stoelker, according to a cross-referencing data bank and the Free Lance-Star, a Fredericksburg newspaper.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has accused Stanford of defrauding 50,000 customers around the world in a multibillion-dollar investment scheme.

Acting at the request of the SEC, FBI agents caught up with Stanford on Thursday in Fredericksburg, which lies halfway between Washington and the old Confederate capital in Richmond.

"We were helping out there to locate and serve papers," said Bill Carter, an FBI spokesman in Washington. Stanford, 58, was not taken into custody or arrested, he said. Carter declined to say how Stanford had been located.

No one at the Stoelkers' house returned a message left on an answering machine that greeted callers with: "You've reached the Stoelkers. We're not available to take your call right now. Please leave a message and we'll call you back as soon as possible."

There were conflicting reports about whether Stanford had surrendered his passport yet. One law enforcement official told Reuters on Thursday that he was making arrangements to do so. ABC News, however, said he had done so Thursday and then driven to Fredericksburg.

Carter referred questions about the passport to the SEC. Kevin Callahan, an SEC spokesman, said he could not immediately clarify the status of Stanford's passport, which a court has ordered him to turn over.

Also uncertain was an ABC News report that Stanford had hired Williams & Connolly partner Brendan Sullivan, one of Washington's best-known criminal defense lawyers, to represent him.

When asked about the ABC report, one of Sullivan's assistants, Rhonda Meadows, told Reuters: "Mr. Sullivan has not been retained."

The SEC filed civil charges in Dallas on Tuesday against Stanford and two colleagues, as well as Stanford International Bank Ltd, Stanford Group Co and Stanford Capital Management LLC. The agency accuses them of a "massive, ongoing fraud."

Until regulators got help Thursday from the FBI, the SEC could not find Stanford. His whereabouts had been the subject of intense speculation since he failed to respond to an SEC subpoena to answer questions about his company's operations.

Officials did not say how the FBI learned that Stanford was in Virginia, but they said he had not been hiding and he was not a fugitive.

British news reports had identified Andrea Stoelker, a former local resident, as Stanford's girlfriend and president of the board of directors of a cricket tournament that he sponsors in Antigua.

An encounter last November between a Free Lance-Star reader and Stanford seemed to support the idea that his girlfriend has local ties.

The reader e-mailed the paper Thursday night, saying Stanford bought the reader's family dinner at a local restaurant, Claiborne's, on November 7 after the family agreed to give up its earlier reservation time.

He introduced himself as Allen Stanford, said he lived in the Virgin Islands and that his girlfriend's parents lived in the area, the reader wrote.

According to a local tour operator, Fredericksburg has a reputation as "one of the most haunted locales in the United States."

"With a long history dating back to pre-Colonial times, and a legacy of slavery and war, it is no wonder that so many unhappy phantoms wander the streets," the tour operator says in promotional material.
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 22, 2009, 02:53:10 PM

(http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/daily/2009/2/22/TE/TE-TT_2S_20090222_S14/articles/TE-TT_2S_20090222_14_91_1_thumb.jpg)

Last week I traveled through the Caribbean. I went to Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten and Aruba. On the island drive the cars around the plate with the inscription "One Happy Island." This cheerful motto does not apply to the Dutch investigators in Aruba. The relationships between a number of ringleaders to police and prosecutors and the Aruban government is not tropical warm. Crucial role in the icy relations plays Justice Minister Rudy Croes, behind each tree is an enemy. It is a little disrespectful that Aruban Minister projectile launched an example, but the man has been involved in many incidents that I still aandurf qualification. Croes I met for the first time in the nineties. He had just turned minister and a very suspicious man. Even members of his own cabinet he trusted no meter. The interview with him took the prominent front page of this newspaper. He advocated the Aruban government to a cocaine test subjects. In the same period saw the Croes chance Zwinkels Dutch Attorney-General of the island to hunt. Zwinkels was closely involved in new legislation which allowed Aruban drug traffickers to supply the U.S.. The minister saw it as a kind of conspiracy of the Netherlands and the United States against the island. Years later I ran again Croes against the body, this time on one of the beautiful beaches of Aruba. It was a few weeks after the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire American press pulls out, including the famous talk show host Geraldo. It was quite embarrassing how Croes but Geraldo turned around and finally begged for a photograph of him with the television star.

Croes recently came back into the news because he is a former police chief Jan van der Straten schoffeerde, MP Hero Brinkman a slap on his face "and wanted to give the newly appointed Dutch Prosecutor Hans Mos sent home. The latter was the victim of Croes' latest conspiracy theory, that the Dutch intelligence service AIVD Aruban government would spy. Croes received confidential information from the Dutch Representation in Aruba owned. In the leaked report would incriminating statements about Oduber Prime Minister, ministers and a member of Croes. Actually, I hope that the almost pathological suspicion of Croes this once justified. It is a reassuring thought that the Netherlands is the dark side of the minister and some other Aruban politicians into the monitor.

telegraaf

when you post something.
can you provide a source link with it.
i would like to read the original article in Dutch.
of course i can find it after a short search, but to include the link is just a bit easier

no problem ,but there is no direct link to that article ( it is in a for members only area )


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 22, 2009, 03:01:35 PM

(http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/daily/2009/2/22/TE/TE-TT_2S_20090222_S14/articles/TE-TT_2S_20090222_14_91_1_thumb.jpg)

Last week I traveled through the Caribbean. I went to Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten and Aruba. On the island drive the cars around the plate with the inscription "One Happy Island." This cheerful motto does not apply to the Dutch investigators in Aruba. The relationships between a number of ringleaders to police and prosecutors and the Aruban government is not tropical warm. Crucial role in the icy relations plays Justice Minister Rudy Croes, behind each tree is an enemy. It is a little disrespectful that Aruban Minister projectile launched an example, but the man has been involved in many incidents that I still aandurf qualification. Croes I met for the first time in the nineties. He had just turned minister and a very suspicious man. Even members of his own cabinet he trusted no meter. The interview with him took the prominent front page of this newspaper. He advocated the Aruban government to a cocaine test subjects. In the same period saw the Croes chance Zwinkels Dutch Attorney-General of the island to hunt. Zwinkels was closely involved in new legislation which allowed Aruban drug traffickers to supply the U.S.. The minister saw it as a kind of conspiracy of the Netherlands and the United States against the island. Years later I ran again Croes against the body, this time on one of the beautiful beaches of Aruba. It was a few weeks after the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire American press pulls out, including the famous talk show host Geraldo. It was quite embarrassing how Croes but Geraldo turned around and finally begged for a photograph of him with the television star.

Croes recently came back into the news because he is a former police chief Jan van der Straten schoffeerde, MP Hero Brinkman a slap on his face "and wanted to give the newly appointed Dutch Prosecutor Hans Mos sent home. The latter was the victim of Croes' latest conspiracy theory, that the Dutch intelligence service AIVD Aruban government would spy. Croes received confidential information from the Dutch Representation in Aruba owned. In the leaked report would incriminating statements about Oduber Prime Minister, ministers and a member of Croes. Actually, I hope that the almost pathological suspicion of Croes this once justified. It is a reassuring thought that the Netherlands is the dark side of the minister and some other Aruban politicians into the monitor.

telegraaf

when you post something.
can you provide a source link with it.
i would like to read the original article in Dutch.
of course i can find it after a short search, but to include the link is just a bit easier

no problem ,but there is no direct link to that article ( it is in a for members only area )

i found it anyway:
http://www.crimesite.nl/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=11464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 03:06:38 PM

(http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/daily/2009/2/22/TE/TE-TT_2S_20090222_S14/articles/TE-TT_2S_20090222_14_91_1_thumb.jpg)

Last week I traveled through the Caribbean. I went to Bonaire, Curacao, St. Maarten and Aruba. On the island drive the cars around the plate with the inscription "One Happy Island." This cheerful motto does not apply to the Dutch investigators in Aruba. The relationships between a number of ringleaders to police and prosecutors and the Aruban government is not tropical warm. Crucial role in the icy relations plays Justice Minister Rudy Croes, behind each tree is an enemy. It is a little disrespectful that Aruban Minister projectile launched an example, but the man has been involved in many incidents that I still aandurf qualification. Croes I met for the first time in the nineties. He had just turned minister and a very suspicious man. Even members of his own cabinet he trusted no meter. The interview with him took the prominent front page of this newspaper. He advocated the Aruban government to a cocaine test subjects. In the same period saw the Croes chance Zwinkels Dutch Attorney-General of the island to hunt. Zwinkels was closely involved in new legislation which allowed Aruban drug traffickers to supply the U.S.. The minister saw it as a kind of conspiracy of the Netherlands and the United States against the island. Years later I ran again Croes against the body, this time on one of the beautiful beaches of Aruba. It was a few weeks after the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and the entire American press pulls out, including the famous talk show host Geraldo. It was quite embarrassing how Croes but Geraldo turned around and finally begged for a photograph of him with the television star.

Croes recently came back into the news because he is a former police chief Jan van der Straten schoffeerde, MP Hero Brinkman a slap on his face "and wanted to give the newly appointed Dutch Prosecutor Hans Mos sent home. The latter was the victim of Croes' latest conspiracy theory, that the Dutch intelligence service AIVD Aruban government would spy. Croes received confidential information from the Dutch Representation in Aruba owned. In the leaked report would incriminating statements about Oduber Prime Minister, ministers and a member of Croes. Actually, I hope that the almost pathological suspicion of Croes this once justified. It is a reassuring thought that the Netherlands is the dark side of the minister and some other Aruban politicians into the monitor.

telegraaf

when you post something.
can you provide a source link with it.
i would like to read the original article in Dutch.
of course i can find it after a short search, but to include the link is just a bit easier

no problem ,but there is no direct link to that article ( it is in a for members only area )

i found it anyway:
http://www.crimesite.nl/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=11464

Caesu is good! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 22, 2009, 03:20:29 PM
i found it in the Newspaper the Telegraaf and not here

http://www.crimesite.nl/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=11464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 04:39:49 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 04:48:00 PM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on February 22, 2009, 04:49:23 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 22, 2009, 05:03:16 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 05:16:26 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::

Hope all is well out in Detroit KarmaRoundup!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 05:32:55 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

And what would this meeting be all about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on February 22, 2009, 05:34:47 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::

Hope all is well out in Detroit KarmaRoundup!
Thanks KTF,things are going great here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 05:36:20 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::

Hope all is well out in Detroit KarmaRoundup!
Thanks KTF,things are going great here.

Know your over in Caylee quite a bit!Always appreciate your posts so feel free to drop us a post every now and again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on February 22, 2009, 06:28:50 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::

Hope all is well out in Detroit KarmaRoundup!
Thanks KTF,things are going great here.

Know your over in Caylee quite a bit!Always appreciate your posts so feel free to drop us a post every now and again!
I used to post in the Caylee thread quite a bit.Now I just read the Natalee,Caylee and Haleigh threads and sometimes musings.
My heart belongs to Natalee and ScaredMonkeys,Natalee is the reason I came to SM's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 06:42:16 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::

Hope all is well out in Detroit KarmaRoundup!
Thanks KTF,things are going great here.

Know your over in Caylee quite a bit!Always appreciate your posts so feel free to drop us a post every now and again!
I used to post in the Caylee thread quite a bit.Now I just read the Natalee,Caylee and Haleigh threads and sometimes musings.
My heart belongs to Natalee and ScaredMonkeys,Natalee is the reason I came to SM's.

We're still pluggin along! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on February 22, 2009, 06:48:42 PM
KarmaRoundUp, truthseeker2, hotping, wreck, johan555


Hello to all up in the rafters! ::MonkeyWink::
Hi KTF
Just catching up on some reading.  ::MonkeyWink::

Hope all is well out in Detroit KarmaRoundup!
Thanks KTF,things are going great here.

Know your over in Caylee quite a bit!Always appreciate your posts so feel free to drop us a post every now and again!
I used to post in the Caylee thread quite a bit.Now I just read the Natalee,Caylee and Haleigh threads and sometimes musings.
My heart belongs to Natalee and ScaredMonkeys,Natalee is the reason I came to SM's.

We're still pluggin along! ::MonkeyWink::
LOL....I see that!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 06:48:56 PM
Hello to al you Monkey's in the rafter's!

Keepthefaith, truthseeker2, 2NJSons_Mom, KarmaRoundUp, Tamikosmom, Lifesong


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on February 22, 2009, 06:50:40 PM
Good afternoon KTF   :smt006



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 06:52:01 PM
Good afternoon KTF   :smt006



It's a great day but,rainy in ol' Seattle today!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 06:58:02 PM
Hello to al you Monkey's in the rafter's!

Keepthefaith, truthseeker2, 2NJSons_Mom, KarmaRoundUp, Tamikosmom, Lifesong

Haven't seen you in awhile TruthSeeker2!have you kept up to speed on things that we've been discussing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 06:59:33 PM
Good Afternoon All.

Hubby and I as well as eldest grandsons (9/1 just got back from a two hour walk on a jogging path along the Fraser River.  It is a cloudy drizzly day but not too cold.  We stopped at a local coffee show on the drive back for hot chocolate and ... boys were treated to a goodie of their choice.

Life is good.  However ... these two young men are growing way too fast.  I am wishing for yesterday already.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I hope all had a good day.

Janet
4:00 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 07:03:22 PM
Good Afternoon All.

Hubby and I as well as eldest grandsons (9/1 just got back from a two hour walk on a jogging path along the Fraser River.  It is a cloudy drizzly day but not too cold.  We stopped at a local coffee show on the drive back for hot chocolate and ... boys were treated to a goodie of their choice.

Life is good.  However ... these two young men are growing way too fast.  I am wishing for yesterday already.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I hope all had a good day.

Janet
4:00 PM PT

Drizzly down here as well Janet!Does anyone know why Kyle was meeting with Mos in public??I thought Kyle wasn't in charge of anything per se.He must've had some responsibility if he was meeting with the prosecutor!No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 07:05:55 PM
Good Afternoon All.

Hubby and I as well as eldest grandsons (9/1 just got back from a two hour walk on a jogging path along the Fraser River.  It is a cloudy drizzly day but not too cold.  We stopped at a local coffee show on the drive back for hot chocolate and ... boys were treated to a goodie of their choice.

Life is good.  However ... these two young men are growing way too fast.  I am wishing for yesterday already.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I hope all had a good day.

Janet
4:00 PM PT

Drizzly down here as well Janet!Does anyone know why Kyle was meeting with Mos in public??I thought Kyle wasn't in charge of anything per se.He must've had some responsibility if he was meeting with the prosecutor!No?

No idea.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 07:09:53 PM
Hello to al you Monkey's in the rafter's!

Keepthefaith, truthseeker2, 2NJSons_Mom, KarmaRoundUp, Tamikosmom, Lifesong

Haven't seen you in awhile TruthSeeker2!have you kept up to speed on things that we've been discussing?

It would sure be nice if the sharing was not all one sided.

I would love to know why John Silvetti is being upheld while ... Kyle Kingman is not being undermine for throwing Silvetti under the bus.

I think it is called an oxymoron.

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 07:18:02 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

This is interesting Janet!Why,for the love of God,is Kyle meeting with Mos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 07:29:57 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

This is interesting Janet!Why,for the love of God,is Kyle meeting with Mos?

I have obviously missed something along the way.  I do not have a clue was the Ranger Rover confession is.  What was the source in regards Beth observing Kyle and Hans Mos meeting with Devries?

The following is all I know in regards to a Kyle/Devries connection.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal



 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 07:41:55 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

This is interesting Janet!Why,for the love of God,is Kyle meeting with Mos?

I have obviously missed something along the way.  I do not have a clue was the Ranger Rover confession is.  What was the source in regards Beth observing Kyle and Hans Mos meeting with Devries?

The following is all I know in regards to a Kyle/Devries connection.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal



 

I think the Range Rover confession is Joran and Patrick in the car in Holland.
Beth flew to NL to see the footage before it aired to the public.  Peter deVries
showed it to her and filmed her reaction.

I have no idea why it was necessary for Kyle to meet with Hans Mos.

It has been scary here today......hardly anybody I knew....a lot of strangers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 07:44:56 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

This is interesting Janet!Why,for the love of God,is Kyle meeting with Mos?

I have obviously missed something along the way.  I do not have a clue was the Ranger Rover confession is.  What was the source in regards Beth observing Kyle and Hans Mos meeting with Devries?

The following is all I know in regards to a Kyle/Devries connection.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal



KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 07:48:09 PM

I think the Range Rover confession is Joran and Patrick in the car in Holland.
Beth flew to NL to see the footage before it aired to the public.  Peter deVries
showed it to her and filmed her reaction.

I have no idea why it was necessary for Kyle to meet with Hans Mos.

It has been scary here today......hardly anybody I knew....a lot of strangers.

Thanks Magnolia.  The clears up some of my confusion.

Hey ... think positive about those "strangers".  You know what they say "Stangers are friends we have yet to meet".

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 07:49:55 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

This is interesting Janet!Why,for the love of God,is Kyle meeting with Mos?

I have obviously missed something along the way.  I do not have a clue was the Ranger Rover confession is.  What was the source in regards Beth observing Kyle and Hans Mos meeting with Devries?

The following is all I know in regards to a Kyle/Devries connection.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal



 

I think the Range Rover confession is Joran and Patrick in the car in Holland.
Beth flew to NL to see the footage before it aired to the public.  Peter deVries
showed it to her and filmed her reaction.

I have no idea why it was necessary for Kyle to meet with Hans Mos.

It has been scary here today......hardly anybody I knew....a lot of strangers.

No worries Magnolia!I think the patterns are quite interesting,as well as the constant variables that this forum has. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 07:55:44 PM
I wasn't here much, but stopped by a time or two and I thought
we had been taken over by aliens. ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 07:57:24 PM
I wasn't here much, but stopped by a time or two and I thought
we had been taken over by aliens. ::MonkeyShocked::


No.probably just recruitment for the other Forums.some are having welcoming parties today! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:01:15 PM
I wasn't here much, but stopped by a time or two and I thought
we had been taken over by aliens. ::MonkeyShocked::

BUCKSHOT

"I have always wondered if a disinformant either (a) or (b) to stay under "radar of detection":
(a) post in softball forum(s) at SM(non-related to NH at first) to fluff post count / gain credibility through post count.
(b) post in various forums at SM (including NH). Blend in, drop tiny tid bits inconspicuously, then steer away undetected.

KEEPTHEFAITH

I think this holds some validity! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 08:01:20 PM
I wasn't here much, but stopped by a time or two and I thought
we had been taken over by aliens. ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Never fear.  Klaas is standing guard.  She is zapping aliens back to their own planet if they do not come in peace.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:04:18 PM
I wasn't here much, but stopped by a time or two and I thought
we had been taken over by aliens. ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Never fear.  Klaas is standing guard.  She is zapping aliens back to their own planet if they do not come in peace.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet



I think copy,paste,copy,paste.Back to the hidey-Hole is where it's at for a few Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 08:13:48 PM
This is from Lifesong's timeline:

01/23/2008
An Aruban journalist posts at RU:  “The Persistence might have found "something" The prosecutor's Office has just been informed recently that the Persistence crew might have found something and currently forensic testings are under way. If it has to do with the Natalee Holloway case or any way related or crucial to the investigation, has yet to be determined.

I reckon that was Renfro that posted at RU.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 22, 2009, 08:17:45 PM

Hey guys,

KTF - I bumped the post about the meeting because I'm curious about it too.



I have a question for any of those Silvetti/Kingman supporters, Janet.  I hope they will answer.

I hope they can back up John Silvetti's own words:

What one single piece of information, in who's confession, was the expansion of the search area based upon?

It may have been necessary to keep such a detail secret a year ago.  There's just no justification for keeping it secret now.

What one single piece of information, in who's confession, was the expansion of the search area based upon?






01/25/2008
 Special Notice:
By John Silvetti (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xiv-search-area.html) – “The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.  Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area.”

Months later [see 04/03/2008], John Silvetti comments further on the expansion of the search area (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989):  “The Persistence completed surveying the initial and extended grids.  Basically, this means that the sonar survey was completed.  Over 275 targets of interest were picked up and analyzed by the sonar interpreters.  Only 25% of the targets were investigated by the ROV.  At that point, we had run out of money and weather.  Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments.”






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 08:20:07 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:21:39 PM

Hey guys,

KTF - I bumped the post about the meeting because I'm curious about it too.



I have a question for any of those Silvetti/Kingman supporters, Janet.  I hope they will answer.

I hope they can back up John Silvetti's own words:

What one single piece of information, in who's confession, was the expansion of the search area based upon?

It may have been necessary to keep such a detail secret a year ago.  There's just no justification for keeping it secret now.

What one single piece of information, in who's confession, was the expansion of the search area based upon?






01/25/2008
 Special Notice:
By John Silvetti (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xiv-search-area.html) – “The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.  Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area.”

Months later [see 04/03/2008], John Silvetti comments further on the expansion of the search area (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989):  “The Persistence completed surveying the initial and extended grids.  Basically, this means that the sonar survey was completed.  Over 275 targets of interest were picked up and analyzed by the sonar interpreters.  Only 25% of the targets were investigated by the ROV.  At that point, we had run out of money and weather.  Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments.”






Great question LifeSong.Maybe Kermit will come on and help us keep rolling.I hope you get what you ask for in terms of the Kingman/Silvetti supporter's but for some reason i don't think you'll get what your looking for but i will KEEPTHEFAITH! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 08:24:13 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.

I thought that might be it too, Klaas.  The timing is right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:27:28 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.

I thought that might be it too, Klaas.  The timing is right.


So.What i would like to know in chronological order of the Joran/Patrick confession tape,who was informed and at what time?We could put that into Lifesongs timeline!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 08:28:04 PM
Isn't there something from Kyle about Dolph Richardson telling them to expand the ssearch?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:34:41 PM
Isn't there something from Kyle about Dolph Richardson telling them to expand the ssearch?

Kyle: "Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 08:37:15 PM
Isn't there something from Kyle about Dolph Richardson telling them to expand the ssearch?

Kyle: "Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Thanks, KTF!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 22, 2009, 08:39:14 PM


Update 3 is posted.  I've had to break it into 2 parts.

Part 1 is here. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4578.msg686024#msg686024)

Part 2 is here. (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4578.msg686128#msg686128)

 ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:39:39 PM
Isn't there something from Kyle about Dolph Richardson telling them to expand the ssearch?

Kyle: "Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Thanks, KTF!!

It would be interesting to nail down the date that Richardson said that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 22, 2009, 08:43:29 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.

I thought that might be it too, Klaas.  The timing is right.

I'm sure it's Joran's confession to Patrick.  I have no doubt of that.

The same confession that wasn't good enough for a re-arrest, held a specific piece of information credible enough to increase the search grid by 200% with no concern for the cost.

I want to know what that one piece of information was.

I do not believe it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:46:20 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.

I thought that might be it too, Klaas.  The timing is right.

I'm sure it's Joran's confession to Patrick.  I have no doubt of that.

The same confession that wasn't good enough for a re-arrest, held a specific piece of information credible enough to increase the search grid by 200% with no concern for the cost.

I want to know what that one piece of information was.

I do not believe it.



Neither do I!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 08:48:44 PM
12/30/2008 – NEW
It is revealed that The Persistence search team had a choice to have a representative of the FBI onboard to retain their initially granted role of observing.  Instead they had a filmcrew onboard. 


 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 09:01:56 PM
12/30/2008 – NEW
It is revealed that The Persistence search team had a choice to have a representative of the FBI onboard to retain their initially granted role of observing.  Instead they had a filmcrew onboard. 


 ::MonkeyNoNo::


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #586 on: December 30, 2008, 09:37:57 PM »


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603761#msg603761


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 09:14:57 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.

I thought that might be it too, Klaas.  The timing is right.

I'm sure it's Joran's confession to Patrick.  I have no doubt of that.

The same confession that wasn't good enough for a re-arrest, held a specific piece of information credible enough to increase the search grid by 200% with no concern for the cost.

I want to know what that one piece of information was.

I do not believe it.




February 15, 2008
Court of Appeal upholds lower judge’s decision not to detain J.v.d.S.
J.v.d.S remains prime suspect
Judicial investigation continues


The Court of Appeal announced by the end of yesterday, February 14th, 2008, its decision to uphold the refusal by the investigating judge to order pre-trial detention of J.v.d.S. in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. The Office of the Public Prosecutor had requested such an order after the “Peter R de Vries-tapes” had been received by the Office and had been evaluated. Last week the Office appealed the ruling of refusal by the judge.

The reasons underlying the Court’s decision are the following. The Court has seen the visual materials, has listened to the audio materials and has inspected the verbatim reports. Based on that, the Court is of the opinion that there is a lack of sufficient facts and circumstances substantiating serious grounds for the suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in the crimes for which he is being held responsible by the prosecution. The Court will generally be a bit more hesitant when it has to decide on a new request for pre-trial detention of a suspect, when that same suspect has been detained repeatedly before and there has been a considerable lapse of time.

J.v.d.S. has given extensive and detailed statements in Patrick van der Eem’s car, the undercover citizen who worked for Peter R. de Vries, on what happened during the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Nevertheless the Court sees various reasons not to accept the serious grounds of suspicion which are statutorily required for pre-trial detention. One of them is the history of contradictory statements by J.v.d.S., which were belied repeatedly by objective findings.  

At this moment those parts of the statements made in Van der Eem’s car which contain new elements are not being underpinned by objective findings. Considering the possibility of a serious personality disorder – as voiced by the prosecution – combined with a personal history of untrue statements and remarks, which even according to the suspect himself are frequently false, the Court of Appeal has reasons for doubt regarding the incriminating character of the “car-statements.”

On the pre-trial detention issue the Code of criminal procedure does not provide for further appeals. The effect of the Court decision is that J.v.d.S. cannot be (re)arrested. The investigation of the Natalee Holloway case continues. J.v.d.S. is again the prime suspect.

At the end of the investigation the Office of the Public Prosecution will decide whether to charge or not

+++++


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Red on February 22, 2009, 09:30:16 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 09:34:50 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Thanks Red, great to hear!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 09:36:50 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Hi Red, and thanks!     ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 22, 2009, 09:42:38 PM
Thanks Red.

This will be in my signature line "There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 22, 2009, 09:42:40 PM
Thank you Red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 09:45:28 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Thank you, Red.    So kind of you to let us know that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 09:45:41 PM
Rather than focusing on the messenger .... rather than focusing on Kermit ... I wish that Lou and her friends would come right out and state why they believe that Kyle Kingman lied and defamed John Sivetti in his posts submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site.

Why is Kyle Kingsman given a free pass.

The bottom line is ...

1.  Kyle Kingman words are fabricated and ... John Silvetti was not a participant in furthering the Aruban coverup that began on May 30, 2005 or ...

2.  Kyle Kingman's words reveal the truth and ... John Silvetti was a participant in furthering the Aruban coverup that began on May 30, 2005.

Which is it??

Case Closed!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 09:48:54 PM
Rather than focusing on the messenger .... rather than focusing on Kermit ... I wish that Lou and her friends would come right out and state why they believe that Kyle Kingman lied and defamed John Sivetti in his posts submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site.

Why is Kyle Kingsman given a free pass.

The bottom line is ...

1.  Kyle Kingman words are fabricated and ... John Silvetti was not a participant in furthering the Aruban coverup that began on May 30, 2005 or ...

2.  Kyle Kingman's words reveal the truth and ... John Silvetti was a participant in furthering the Aruban coverup that began on May 30, 2005.

Which is it??

Case Closed!!!

Janet


Janet - exactly, it's one or the other.  Here is my other fear.  IF Dave, Tim, Silvetti are getting ready to go back to Aruba for another search, is Kyle going along too? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 09:49:10 PM
Truthseeker2, I hope you got Red's post Copied to Paste at CnG.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 09:52:05 PM
Truthseeker2, I hope you got Red's post Copied to Paste at CnG.

As well as goldmonkey!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 09:52:23 PM
Truthseeker2, I hope you got Red's post Copied to Paste at CnG.

And Goldmonkey  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 09:53:12 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 22, 2009, 09:54:33 PM
Is there an echo in here? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 09:54:51 PM
I believe not enough Thanx is givin to Red,Klaas,San,Nut,2nj,Muffy,as well as any other Mods that i left out.Scared Monkey's is a place that help's seek JUSTICE FOR THOSE WITHOUT VOICES...

Thank You,
       KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 09:59:17 PM
Thank You Red! Your post tonight means the world to Me and I'm sure too many others!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 10:00:12 PM
Hey TM...Good to see You!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 10:00:52 PM
Is there an echo in here? ::MonkeyHaHa::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 10:02:49 PM
Hey TM...Good to see You!  ::MonkeyWink::

Hi Hotping!    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 10:03:45 PM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 10:05:02 PM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.

Thanks Klaas!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 10:05:19 PM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.
Thank You Klaas!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 22, 2009, 10:08:02 PM
Thank you, Red.  I certainly agree that this family has been through enough.

The last thing any of them need would be internet posters carrying tales to them and providing false information about what was said and by whom and I have to wonder why anybody would do such a warped thing in the first place.

Young Kyle's relationship with his employers appears to be very complicated and not something easily explained.  I also doubt Tim Miller has the time to go into such lengthy and complicated interactions.  None of these people deserve to be drug into the mess Kyle has made of things with his posts and claims.

If a new search is in the works, I wonder what could be the agreement concerning anything found that could relate to Natalee.  Would ALE once again be given exclusive contact given their history?  If so, why bother as everything will just disappear again.


,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 22, 2009, 10:08:07 PM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.

 ::MonkeyCool::  Both will be a help.  It would be nice to know exactly when Tim left the Persistence.

Red, thanks for sharing the conversation with Beth. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 22, 2009, 10:08:20 PM



Thank you, Red.  You should never have had to ask.



 ::cartwheel::


On we go... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on February 22, 2009, 10:09:27 PM
Truthseeker2, I hope you got Red's post Copied to Paste at CnG.

And Goldmonkey  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL. I actually am too slow for copy and paste.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 22, 2009, 10:10:12 PM



Thank you, Red.  You should never have had to ask.



 ::cartwheel::


On we go... ::MonkeyCool::


So true, Lifesong. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 10:11:22 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Thanx Red!Let's keep rolling Monkey's.We are not going anywhere Natalee Holloway!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on February 22, 2009, 10:11:50 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Thank You, Red


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on February 22, 2009, 10:13:44 PM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.


Wonderful, Klaas, Thank You!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 10:28:14 PM
Thank You Red! Your post tonight means the world to Me and I'm sure too many others!  ::MonkeyCool::

Amen.God Bless you Red!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 10:33:47 PM
Truthseeker2, I hope you got Red's post Copied to Paste at CnG.

And Goldmonkey  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL. I actually am too slow for copy and paste.

Please do ask Klaas for a link to the slide show unless you've already seen it! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Mere on February 22, 2009, 10:49:10 PM
For those of us who would like to help, is there anything we might do? 
 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 22, 2009, 10:50:17 PM
I feel so badly for Tim Miller because he has chest pains and bleeding ulcer and every day is with some poor family somewhere searching and dealing with God only knows what.

Florida alone has kept him busy of late.  I don't think it is humanly possible to do all this man tries to do. 

The sudden appearance of that Marcos person was very interesting especially the timing.

JMO




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 10:52:46 PM
                                         THE POWER OF ONE GIRL
                                                   
                                            NATALEE HOLLOWAY

                                                    A VOICE.
                                           THAT IS STILL HEARD..


                                                      ARUBA
                                           WE'LL NEVER GO AWAY!




                                             


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 22, 2009, 10:53:01 PM
For those of us who would like to help, is there anything we might do? 
 ::MonkeyDance::

What you have been doing since day one Mere.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 10:53:53 PM
Posted by Lorain at RU:

Quote
LoRain Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:16 pm   

Many pardons....but I'm not sure anyone got the question...WHY do SM's still say that Natalee was in the cage when Dave is on his way to FIND HER????

But really I just want the question asked at SM....usually folks are lined up to copy and paste elsewhere but for some strange reason....NOT this time....why is that??....
You just don't get it do you?  It's not so much we believe Natalee was in the trap, as that KYLE believed she was in the trap.  Kyle's own words point to a diversion AGAIN by the Aruban authorities and yet ANOTHER injustice to Natalee and her family.  Did KYLE tell the truth or did KYLE lie? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Mere on February 22, 2009, 10:58:24 PM
For those of us who would like to help, is there anything we might do? 
 ::MonkeyDance::

What you have been doing since day one Mere.

San....I have read and read and then sometimes I google an answer....lol....but the group is on research regarding the boat...I have been reading Janet's and Lifesong's work lately.  I wish I were still on the Gulf Coast.  I would track down that POBox....!   :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 22, 2009, 11:01:26 PM
Posted by Lorain at RU:

Quote
LoRain Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:16 pm   

Many pardons....but I'm not sure anyone got the question...WHY do SM's still say that Natalee was in the cage when Dave is on his way to FIND HER????

But really I just want the question asked at SM....usually folks are lined up to copy and paste elsewhere but for some strange reason....NOT this time....why is that??....
You just don't get it do you?  It's not so much we believe Natalee was in the trap, as that KYLE believed she was in the trap.  Kyle's own words point to a diversion AGAIN by the Aruban authorities and yet ANOTHER injustice to Natalee and her family.  Did KYLE tell the truth or did KYLE lie? 



Where has SM said that Natalee was in the trap?

That was Kyle who said human remains, etc.  I don't know if she was or not and the reason I don't know is that whatever was in the trap was given exclusively to ALE.

Given their history, how can anybody claim to know what they did with the trap contents?  Kyle said it was human remains and fitted a photo of Natalee over the contents of the trap.

Also, some keep forgetting that the door of the trap was forced inward and that must be taken into account in these measurements which makes them somewhat differrent.  Some always measure against a quarter of the trap when in fact it is the entire door that I believe the baggies are on top of. 

Is that a correct assumption in regards to the door or am I confused as usual?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 22, 2009, 11:01:29 PM
For those of us who would like to help, is there anything we might do? 
 ::MonkeyDance::

What you have been doing since day one Mere.

San....I have read and read and then sometimes I google an answer....lol....but the group is on research regarding the boat...I have been reading Janet's and Lifesong's work lately.  I wish I were still on the Gulf Coast.  I would track down that POBox....!   :)


Hummmm maybe a visit  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 11:04:37 PM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.

According to Kyle Kingman ... Tim was not on board the Persistence after January 1, 2008.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI. For the Holloways, though, another wild ride began.

This bizarre story originated in the central American nation of Nicaragua.

It happened last month, when Natalee’s father Dave received a message from a man who called himself Marcos. He said he had important information about where they could find Natalee's body.

Dave Holloway: He said, "I’d done some wrongs in my past," and he said, "This is my way of making all of my wrongs and all of my sins and doing something right."

Dave was skeptical, but the phone and e-mail messages continued.

In them was a wild tale involving drug runners who said that on the night Natalee disappeared someone had paid them to take her body and dump it at sea.

They agreed but instead they took her remains with them to Nicaragua and hid them on a remote strip of the Atlantic coast.  

Dave Holloway: It was a little bit far-fetched for me.

Chris Hansen: What did he want in return?

Dave Holloway: He told us he didn't want anything. And that is what part I started believing in this guy. I said we've got a reward out here.

In January, Dave Holloway asked Tim Miller to head to Nicaragua to arrange for a meeting...and to Miller's surprise, Marcos showed up

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: memphis on February 22, 2009, 11:05:48 PM
Truthseeker2, I hope you got Red's post Copied to Paste at CnG.

And Goldmonkey  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL. I actually am too slow for copy and paste.

You take care! I guess I won't get to chat with you any more. :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 11:07:56 PM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 11:12:09 PM
Posted by Lorain at RU:

Quote
LoRain Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:16 pm   

Many pardons....but I'm not sure anyone got the question...WHY do SM's still say that Natalee was in the cage when Dave is on his way to FIND HER????

But really I just want the question asked at SM....usually folks are lined up to copy and paste elsewhere but for some strange reason....NOT this time....why is that??....
You just don't get it do you?  It's not so much we believe Natalee was in the trap, as that KYLE believed she was in the trap.  Kyle's own words point to a diversion AGAIN by the Aruban authorities and yet ANOTHER injustice to Natalee and her family.  Did KYLE tell the truth or did KYLE lie? 



THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

John Silvetti

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
 
Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Fabric - Tarp - Vertibre - Skull

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: In my opinion that last pic from Jan 7th should be absolutely intriguing and flip your mind from what you thought you knew. In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric.

Kyle: Notice the blue fabric swayed in the current.

Kyle: The blue tarp piece was found approx 6-10 ft away from the trap opening.

Kyle:  The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle: The most likely to remain at or near it's original location was the skull, which is why I was so convinced the object pictured was a skull.

Kyle:   … John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand

Kyle:  I'm sorry if this is disturbing. I took the picture of Natalee standing on the beach and cropped, rotated, and scaled the image to correlate with the trap body form.  Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand.

Kyle: The bag that is above the denim bag looks to me as though it contains pieces of  vertebrae.

Kyle: The fabric(s?) are not visible on either the Dec 29th or 30th dives. There is about an inch of sand over the fabrics. The fabrics are completely covered. The diver sampled the sand and found the fabric underneath the sand. He then bagged the blue fabric. If the other bag contains fabric, it was also in the sand. There was also something possibly recovered from far inside the trap. In the video the diver is inside the trap with just below his knees showing. I don't know what was sampled far inside the trap if anything.

Kyle:  The contents of the trap were being actively investigated. The forensic results of a fabric sample showed the fabric sample was not a match to Natalee's blouse and that no DNA match to Natalee was found within that fabric sample. Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

Kyle:  In my opinion, the blue fabric is quite possibly Natalee's skirt. The divers found the denim where I suggested a week earlier (Dec 29th) to Tim Miller that there was likely Natalee's denim skirt under the sand.  Also in my opinion, the deni-like fabric is a match in terms of color, quantity, and structure to Natalee's skirt. It's not a lot of denim folded in the bag, but then again her skirt was rather small.

Kyle: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains.

Kyle:  … Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.
 
Kyle: The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle: In my opinion that last pic from Jan 7th should be absolutely intriguing and flip your mind from what you thought you knew.  In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric.

++++++

Kyle Kingman’s Summary

Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 11:23:49 PM
Heath Ledger wins Best-supporting actor for the Joker,as well as Red posts a wonderful encouraging statement from Beth Holloway..What impeccable timing........ ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 22, 2009, 11:24:10 PM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.


Klaas, I have always thought this was when Tim was off chasing down Marcos.  I wonder who put Marcos up to all that.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 11:29:20 PM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.


Klaas, I have always thought this was when Tim was off chasing down Marcos.  I wonder who put Marcos up to all that.

.

Exactly Anna. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on February 22, 2009, 11:31:33 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Woo Hoo   ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyCool::

(Hey Lou stick this).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 11:34:19 PM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.


Klaas, I have always thought this was when Tim was off chasing down Marcos.  I wonder who put Marcos up to all that.

.

Exactly Anna. 

That would be an interesting part to add to the chronological timeline LifeSong is putting together.I think it would be very telling..Names of those who contacted Dave,and or Tim,dates,and times...Inquiring minds want to know! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 11:34:26 PM
 
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #785 12/13/08 -
« Reply #901 on: December 17, 2008, 07:17:24 PM »


JOHN SILVETTI TELLS CAPS THAT THE TRAP/CAGE IS A POSTOFFICE AND THE CAGE WAS EMPTY.

MARCH 3, 2008 – John Silvetti meets with CapsLockWizard

From an email sent from CapsLockWizard:

“Yes, We did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage. The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good. About the Pipes. They will be checked. Also John thinks that the signs are there but need to drain the pond. Also Withness is 99% it was some one that came from the pond area that he saw, because it looks like a dutch man and was cover in mud from the chest down.”

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4239.msg588188#msg588188

+++++++++


I just grabbed a bunch of the trap pics I have.  There may be a couple of duplicates in this group.  Pay attention to the date/time stamp:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/TrapCloseup.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap2.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap2a.jpg)


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap3.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap5.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trap6.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm1.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/trapkerm2-1.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Red on February 22, 2009, 11:35:28 PM



Thank you, Red.  You should never have had to ask.

 ::cartwheel::

On we go... ::MonkeyCool::


No I shouldn't; however, sadly some need to see the truth rather than the bs fabrications and misrepresentations that some wish to put out there.

SM was the very first blog discussing this case for obvious reasons. Namely my past associations with Aruba and people in Aruba.

I was the first to go to Aruba and search for Natalee, digging side by side Dave Holloway in the landfill. Long before it became en vogue for going to Aruba, playing Sam Spade to get reward money for finding NH, there was SM. Long before deals were made with Date Line, there was Red discussing the daily landfill search on Court TV.

Long before there was a water search, there was a land search that was done with all the persistence in the world trying to find Natalee on Aruba. I would love to paint a rosy, cheery picture that everyone felt good after the search like what was done when the Persistence left Aruba ... but I cannot and will not.

Frankly, after nearly 2 weeks of searching for Natalee with the pond searches, digging in the landfill and scouring Aruba with no traces of Natalee and leaving Aruba ... I personally felt terrible. I thought so many times we had found her, like when we searched the VDS's neighbors property. There is nothing worse in the world than not accomplishing one's goal. There is no amount of trying your best or putting your best effort forward that rids one of that feeling. Just trying in my book does not cut it, success is defined by meeting one's goals, not just making an effort, That is why there is still unfinished business when it come to Natalee.

The goal has always been to bring Natalee home and provide Justice for Natalee. Not just make an effort. Not do things because you make yourself feel better. Or do things because it brings attention upon yourself and say look at me.

For all the stupid and ignorant comments I have read since May 2005 in that respect, those that make such uninformed comments have not a clue. You people have no idea what makes me tick and what makes the many good hearted people at SM tick. So you should really stop trying to think you do.

For those of you that continue with the ignorance of Red writing a book ... grow up. Maybe you can provide me with a title as well. Some of the jealousy and haters on the internet are really old and tired. We have dealt with this from near the beginning of this case when Aruba actually paid people to cause havoc.

The point in many respects was to also get out the message to people who did not follow the case that Natalee was still missing and that Aruba has still done nothing. It was not to selfishly preach to the choir or have info on private or member only sites. What the hell is the point in that? What purpose does that serve?

There is a reason why SM posts on numerous stories other than just crime or missing persons. That is so that people who do not normally follow such stories also can read about these cases. Its called getting the story out to eyes that are not familiar with the facts at hand. There is a reason why SM has over at present almost 16.5 million visitors and 49.5 million page views since 2005.  There is a reason why we have a separate Missing Persons site, Radio Show and now True Crime blog.

The vision of SM is to have important stories seen and heard by as many people as possible. We believe in developing relationships with victims of crime, Law Enforcement and Search Teams. The vision of SM to to help victims of crime by overtly by communication and behind the scenes.

One would think that if people really were for Natalee Holloway and Natalee's family that the petty jealousies would be put aside for the sake of the family. People really need to look in the mirror and look internally at their souls and ask themselves why they are doing things.

Personally, I could care less what other blogs do ... they have their own site owners. Barring certain internet courtesy's, they do as they wish as that is their right. No one has to read at them if you do not like what they have to say. The same holds true here. It fascinates me that people actually read a site that they cannot stand and then post about it elsewhere. We know what goes on other sites and what is said. At the so-called private sites. Please, there is nothing private on the web. Frankly, who has time for hate when the point is to provide help.

There are few complete truths in life; however, one of them is that no one will agree on everything. That is why there is a little thing called free speech. Some where, some place out there, water will find its own level and everyone on the internet will find there own home. There is freedom of speech; however, there is no freedom that people have to listen or agree with you.

Scared Monkeys always has been a victims rights blog/forum and dedicated to making a difference. People's hate and petty jealousies are not going to stop that. The site has been read by millions and will continue to be read by millions more.

Very few places exist where individuals comments are read by so many.

We have had Natalee's family support from the beginning and will continue to do so. No one knows loss more than Beth Holloway and very few people have had the opportunity to see that sadness up close and person as I have. When it occurs its nearly brings me to tears; however, then it makes me even stronger to finish the job and continue fighting for the family.

That's what this is about to all the misguided individuals out there. Getting results for victims. Those that would want to stop such an effort may want to question why they claim to be for the family.

Sorry for the rant, but felt it was needed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 11:41:29 PM
Bravo RED!  :smt041 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on February 22, 2009, 11:44:45 PM
Bravo RED!  :smt041 :smt045

I was sooooooo glad to see Red post this and hear Beth's words.  It is comforting to know that the family still needs our help.

Got to run.  I am just about finished transcribing 100 pages of court documents from the 1700's.  Believe me it is a chore.  My family website is going to be so glad to get these case documents.  So much info in them.

Will get back on site this week and try to get up to speed.

Good nite and take care.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 11:45:53 PM
Nite Blue Moon!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 22, 2009, 11:46:09 PM
Good Night Monkeys!!  Good Night Zookeepers!!

Beth Holloway's acknowledgement that Monkeys continue to uphold her ... continue to honor her in her ... in her quest for truth and justice.

Red ... thank you for sharing.

Janet
8:45 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 22, 2009, 11:46:44 PM
Bravo RED!  :smt041 :smt045

I was sooooooo glad to see Red post this and hear Beth's words.  It is comforting to know that the family still needs our help.

Got to run.  I am just about finished transcribing 100 pages of court documents from the 1700's.  Believe me it is a chore.  My family website is going to be so glad to get these case documents.  So much info in them.

Will get back on site this week and try to get up to speed.

Good nite and take care.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.

Goodnight Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 22, 2009, 11:48:05 PM
Nite Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on February 22, 2009, 11:48:15 PM


AMEN, RED!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 11:50:31 PM
Thank You Again Red......Your posts say it all.....I Really appreciate Your Rant!  ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 11:50:58 PM
                               JUSTICE FOR THOSE WITHOUT VOICE

                                    GOD BLESS SCARED MONKEY'S


                                            ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 22, 2009, 11:51:09 PM
Nite Janet and Blue Moon!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 11:51:55 PM
Goodnight BM,as well as Janet! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 22, 2009, 11:53:28 PM
Goodnight Blue Moon and Janet!

AMEN Red! 

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on February 22, 2009, 11:54:59 PM
I must add, that your post really touched me, Red.

The truthfullness, emotion and just your heartfelt words are very stirring.

Thank you so much and God Bless you for everything you are doing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 22, 2009, 11:56:45 PM
RED

"That's what this is about to all the misguided individuals out there. Getting results for victims. Those that would want to stop such an effort may want to question why they claim to be for the family."


KEEPTHEFAITH

Nothing more,Nothing Less!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 12:01:37 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Holloway.jpg)
TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 12:05:28 AM


Goodnight Monkeys!    ::MonkeyCool::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 12:06:17 AM
Carry on, Monkeys.  It's what we do.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 23, 2009, 12:06:38 AM
I'm humbled, and never more proud to be a Scared Monkey than right now.  God Bless you all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 12:06:42 AM
Good Night TM!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 23, 2009, 12:07:45 AM
Red,
Thank you for your heart felt comments.
I am here to see Justice for Natalee.....
I know I'm at the right place.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:09:17 AM
Red,
Thank you for your heart felt comments.
I am here to see Justice for Natalee.....
I know I'm at the right place.


How polite of you to say that without having any stacks before hand BILLB! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 23, 2009, 12:14:44 AM
Red,
Thank you for your heart felt comments.
I am here to see Justice for Natalee.....
I know I'm at the right place.


How polite of you to say that without having any stacks before hand BILLB! ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF...you got me in trouble with 2NJSons last night for being off topic...I'm not going to let you get me in trouble..again! what with the laptops, up in my cabin, backwoods and all.... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 12:15:01 AM
I'm humbled, and never more proud to be a Scared Monkey than right now.  God Bless you all.
God Bless You Too Snoopy. Scared Monkeys are the Best!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:16:43 AM


Goodnight Monkeys!    ::MonkeyCool::





Goodnight TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 12:17:36 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 12:18:30 AM
It is comforting to read Red's rant.

Kermit and the monkeys have been bashed and lied about so much that it is
disheartening.  Kermit is tough to have taken so much abuse.  Some days it
has been hard to take all of the unpleasant post from people who were once
united in the same effort to bring Natalee home.

Red's post made me feel that we have backup.....always a good feeling and
it is good to know that Beth still stands with the Monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 23, 2009, 12:18:40 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:19:01 AM
Red,
Thank you for your heart felt comments.
I am here to see Justice for Natalee.....
I know I'm at the right place.


How polite of you to say that without having any stacks before hand BILLB! ::MonkeyHaHa::
KTF...you got me in trouble with 2NJSons last night for being off topic...I'm not going to let you get me in trouble..again! what with the laptops, up in my cabin, backwoods and all.... ::MonkeyLaugh::

2nj.Is this true? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:21:52 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

No we're not Billb.And for all those hidey-hole people.What don't you understand?Beth said we're doing just fine here at Scared Monkey's... ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 23, 2009, 12:22:48 AM
It is comforting to read Red's rant.

Kermit and the monkeys have been bashed and lied about so much that it is
disheartening.  Kermit is tough to have taken so much abuse.  Some days it
has been hard to take all of the unpleasant post from people who were once
united in the same effort to bring Natalee home.

Red's post made me feel that we have backup.....always a good feeling and
it is good to know that Beth still stands with the Monkeys.

Well said Magnolia, I agree.

Thanks to Red for taking the time to speak with Beth and to share the benefit of that discussion with everyone here.

Everyone rest well.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:23:37 AM
It is comforting to read Red's rant.

Kermit and the monkeys have been bashed and lied about so much that it is
disheartening.  Kermit is tough to have taken so much abuse.  Some days it
has been hard to take all of the unpleasant post from people who were once
united in the same effort to bring Natalee home.

Red's post made me feel that we have backup.....always a good feeling and
it is good to know that Beth still stands with the Monkeys.

Well said Magnolia, I agree.

Thanks to Red for taking the time to speak with Beth and to share the benefit of that discussion with everyone here.

Everyone rest well.



Goodnight None.Go Huskies!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 12:31:06 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 23, 2009, 12:32:35 AM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.


I am 5 pages behind! I will catch up shortly! I am so  relieved/happy!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Mere on February 23, 2009, 12:33:23 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 12:35:22 AM
 ::MonkeyCool::   I see only one guest right now.  Guess the movie is over for some. 

I'm going to say g'nite.  See you all later. 

Carry on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 12:35:33 AM
It is comforting to read Red's rant.

Kermit and the monkeys have been bashed and lied about so much that it is
disheartening.  Kermit is tough to have taken so much abuse.  Some days it
has been hard to take all of the unpleasant post from people who were once
united in the same effort to bring Natalee home.

Red's post made me feel that we have backup.....always a good feeling and
it is good to know that Beth still stands with the Monkeys.


All of Natalee's Freebirds are heros, Magnolia.  We are grateful to all of you.

Red, I'm sure you know we would never want to let you down.  We honor your efforts with our own.

Kermit, integrity is always my favorite.  Thank you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 23, 2009, 12:37:17 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.
Thanks 2NJSons...
I felt bad contributing to OT...but I get caught up in the moment...
It's all good!.
Great post by Red letting us know we are on track for Justice for Natalee...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 12:40:16 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.
Thanks 2NJSons...
I felt bad contributing to OT...but I get caught up in the moment...
It's all good!.
Great post by Red letting us know we are on track for Justice for Natalee...

Yes, it's all good, billb.  Love your contributions.  Yes, Red's post keeps us in a positive motion for that justice.     ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 23, 2009, 12:42:46 AM



Thank you, Red.  You should never have had to ask.

 ::cartwheel::

On we go... ::MonkeyCool::


No I shouldn't; however, sadly some need to see the truth rather than the bs fabrications and misrepresentations that some wish to put out there.

SM was the very first blog discussing this case for obvious reasons. Namely my past associations with Aruba and people in Aruba.

I was the first to go to Aruba and search for Natalee, digging side by side Dave Holloway in the landfill. Long before it became en vogue for going to Aruba, playing Sam Spade to get reward money for finding NH, there was SM. Long before deals were made with Date Line, there was Red discussing the daily landfill search on Court TV.

Long before there was a water search, there was a land search that was done with all the persistence in the world trying to find Natalee on Aruba. I would love to paint a rosy, cheery picture that everyone felt good after the search like what was done when the Persistence left Aruba ... but I cannot and will not.

Frankly, after nearly 2 weeks of searching for Natalee with the pond searches, digging in the landfill and scouring Aruba with no traces of Natalee and leaving Aruba ... I personally felt terrible. I thought so many times we had found her, like when we searched the VDS's neighbors property. There is nothing worse in the world than not accomplishing one's goal. There is no amount of trying your best or putting your best effort forward that rids one of that feeling. Just trying in my book does not cut it, success is defined by meeting one's goals, not just making an effort, That is why there is still unfinished business when it come to Natalee.

The goal has always been to bring Natalee home and provide Justice for Natalee. Not just make an effort. Not do things because you make yourself feel better. Or do things because it brings attention upon yourself and say look at me.

For all the stupid and ignorant comments I have read since May 2005 in that respect, those that make such uninformed comments have not a clue. You people have no idea what makes me tick and what makes the many good hearted people at SM tick. So you should really stop trying to think you do.

For those of you that continue with the ignorance of Red writing a book ... grow up. Maybe you can provide me with a title as well. Some of the jealousy and haters on the internet are really old and tired. We have dealt with this from near the beginning of this case when Aruba actually paid people to cause havoc.

The point in many respects was to also get out the message to people who did not follow the case that Natalee was still missing and that Aruba has still done nothing. It was not to selfishly preach to the choir or have info on private or member only sites. What the hell is the point in that? What purpose does that serve?

There is a reason why SM posts on numerous stories other than just crime or missing persons. That is so that people who do not normally follow such stories also can read about these cases. Its called getting the story out to eyes that are not familiar with the facts at hand. There is a reason why SM has over at present almost 16.5 million visitors and 49.5 million page views since 2005.  There is a reason why we have a separate Missing Persons site, Radio Show and now True Crime blog.

The vision of SM is to have important stories seen and heard by as many people as possible. We believe in developing relationships with victims of crime, Law Enforcement and Search Teams. The vision of SM to to help victims of crime by overtly by communication and behind the scenes.

One would think that if people really were for Natalee Holloway and Natalee's family that the petty jealousies would be put aside for the sake of the family. People really need to look in the mirror and look internally at their souls and ask themselves why they are doing things.

Personally, I could care less what other blogs do ... they have their own site owners. Barring certain internet courtesy's, they do as they wish as that is their right. No one has to read at them if you do not like what they have to say. The same holds true here. It fascinates me that people actually read a site that they cannot stand and then post about it elsewhere. We know what goes on other sites and what is said. At the so-called private sites. Please, there is nothing private on the web. Frankly, who has time for hate when the point is to provide help.

There are few complete truths in life; however, one of them is that no one will agree on everything. That is why there is a little thing called free speech. Some where, some place out there, water will find its own level and everyone on the internet will find there own home. There is freedom of speech; however, there is no freedom that people have to listen or agree with you.

Scared Monkeys always has been a victims rights blog/forum and dedicated to making a difference. People's hate and petty jealousies are not going to stop that. The site has been read by millions and will continue to be read by millions more.

Very few places exist where individuals comments are read by so many.

We have had Natalee's family support from the beginning and will continue to do so. No one knows loss more than Beth Holloway and very few people have had the opportunity to see that sadness up close and person as I have. When it occurs its nearly brings me to tears; however, then it makes me even stronger to finish the job and continue fighting for the family.

That's what this is about to all the misguided individuals out there. Getting results for victims. Those that would want to stop such an effort may want to question why they claim to be for the family.

Sorry for the rant, but felt it was needed.
Okay, now I am only 2 pages behind! WOW! Thank-you, RED!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:43:03 AM
::MonkeyCool::   I see only one guest right now.  Guess the movie is over for some. 

I'm going to say g'nite.  See you all later. 

Carry on.

Goodnight 2nj!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 12:44:44 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:45:03 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.
Thanks 2NJSons...
I felt bad contributing to OT...but I get caught up in the moment...
It's all good!.
Great post by Red letting us know we are on track for Justice for Natalee...


Just went back and re-read BillB.I believe it was my fault so i do apologize for taking you off topic! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 23, 2009, 12:45:16 AM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.

According to Kyle Kingman ... Tim was not on board the Persistence after January 1, 2008.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI. For the Holloways, though, another wild ride began.

This bizarre story originated in the central American nation of Nicaragua.

It happened last month, when Natalee’s father Dave received a message from a man who called himself Marcos. He said he had important information about where they could find Natalee's body.

Dave Holloway: He said, "I’d done some wrongs in my past," and he said, "This is my way of making all of my wrongs and all of my sins and doing something right."

Dave was skeptical, but the phone and e-mail messages continued.

In them was a wild tale involving drug runners who said that on the night Natalee disappeared someone had paid them to take her body and dump it at sea.

They agreed but instead they took her remains with them to Nicaragua and hid them on a remote strip of the Atlantic coast.  

Dave Holloway: It was a little bit far-fetched for me.

Chris Hansen: What did he want in return?

Dave Holloway: He told us he didn't want anything. And that is what part I started believing in this guy. I said we've got a reward out here.

In January, Dave Holloway asked Tim Miller to head to Nicaragua to arrange for a meeting...and to Miller's surprise, Marcos showed up

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


?????? Marcos showed up? I thought he never posted...What came of the meeting? Nada? Any details?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 23, 2009, 12:46:22 AM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.

Can this conversation by facilitated?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:48:49 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

I'm with you in prayers HotPing! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 12:51:18 AM
I've asked Red to see if he can find out from Tim Miller if they are really going back to Aruba for another ocean search. 

I've also asked Red to find out from Tim Miller if he was on or off the Persistence on January 7, 2008.

According to Kyle Kingman ... Tim was not on board the Persistence after January 1, 2008.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI. For the Holloways, though, another wild ride began.

This bizarre story originated in the central American nation of Nicaragua.

It happened last month, when Natalee’s father Dave received a message from a man who called himself Marcos. He said he had important information about where they could find Natalee's body.

Dave Holloway: He said, "I’d done some wrongs in my past," and he said, "This is my way of making all of my wrongs and all of my sins and doing something right."

Dave was skeptical, but the phone and e-mail messages continued.

In them was a wild tale involving drug runners who said that on the night Natalee disappeared someone had paid them to take her body and dump it at sea.

They agreed but instead they took her remains with them to Nicaragua and hid them on a remote strip of the Atlantic coast.  

Dave Holloway: It was a little bit far-fetched for me.

Chris Hansen: What did he want in return?

Dave Holloway: He told us he didn't want anything. And that is what part I started believing in this guy. I said we've got a reward out here.

In January, Dave Holloway asked Tim Miller to head to Nicaragua to arrange for a meeting...and to Miller's surprise, Marcos showed up

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


?????? Marcos showed up? I thought he never posted...What came of the meeting? Nada? Any details?

It was all in the Dateline Show.  Marcos showed up for one or two meetings.  It is even
on film.  Then he disappeared when he was suppose to take them to Natalee's body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 23, 2009, 12:53:13 AM
I know most of us THINK we are on the right track -- it is comforting to have a few encouraging words from Red!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 23, 2009, 12:58:55 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.
Thanks 2NJSons...
I felt bad contributing to OT...but I get caught up in the moment...
It's all good!.
Great post by Red letting us know we are on track for Justice for Natalee...


Just went back and re-read BillB.I believe it was my fault so i do apologize for taking you off topic! ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I read here everyday..I am in awe with what goes on here with the investigating skills of so many...all looking for Justice for Natalee.....
I only post late at night as I don't want to disrupt the flow...
I do feel a connection with SM because I see the injustice with Natalee's case...and I so hope and pray that day will come for Natalee.....
I enjoy the tit for tat with you, TM, and many others.....I always enjoyed ROBOTS comments, still look forward to Janet's posts (she tends to keep everyone grounded)....Kermit, Jen, all the Freebirds that were so kind to bring there story to SM....and of course Red for the opportunity allowing us all to be involved...Klaasend and all the wonderful mods...
Red really summed it up well this evening.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 12:59:12 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

I wish you luck, Hotping. 
Soliciting funds through the mail under false pretenses is mail fraud....I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 12:59:19 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

I'm with you in prayers HotPing! ::MonkeyDance::
Thanks KTF!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 23, 2009, 01:01:15 AM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.

Can this conversation by facilitated?

Buckshot - Red indicated to me he was going to try and contact Tim and ask him if there is an upcoming Aruba trip.  I asked him while he was at it to find out if Tim Miller was on the Persistence when the Aruban divers dove on the trap on January 7, 2008.  Hopefully Tim won't be too busy and Red can find out for us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:01:22 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

I wish you luck, Hotping. 
Soliciting funds through the mail under false pretenses is mail fraud....I think.

It is a Felony,as well as a FEDERAL offense if i'm not mistaken!Monkey's?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 01:02:37 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

I wish you luck, Hotping. 
Soliciting funds through the mail under false pretenses is mail fraud....I think.
Thank You Magnolia! Yep Mail Fraud....Not a Good Thing to be doing!  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 23, 2009, 01:03:27 AM
After almost 3 3/4 years -- I am more energized as ever!  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:04:22 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.
Thanks 2NJSons...
I felt bad contributing to OT...but I get caught up in the moment...
It's all good!.
Great post by Red letting us know we are on track for Justice for Natalee...


Just went back and re-read BillB.I believe it was my fault so i do apologize for taking you off topic! ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I read here everyday..I am in awe with what goes on here with the investigating skills of so many...all looking for Justice for Natalee.....
I only post late at night as I don't want to disrupt the flow...
I do feel a connection with SM because I see the injustice with Natalee's case...and I so hope and pray that day will come for Natalee.....
I enjoy the tit for tat with you, TM, and many others.....I always enjoyed ROBOTS comments, still look forward to Janet's posts (she tends to keep everyone grounded)....Kermit, Jen, all the Freebirds that were so kind to bring there story to SM....and of course Red for the opportunity allowing us all to be involved...Klaasend and all the wonderful mods...
Red really summed it up well this evening.....

The feelings are likewise BillB.Everybody does their part to keep this train headin down the tracks!Other's do there's to try and get the train of the tracks but,the Conductor and his staff are extrordinary!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 23, 2009, 01:08:23 AM
In all seriousness..Red's comments tells me that SM IS making a difference keeping Natalee's case alive after 3 yrs, 9 months...Because each of us believe that Natalee/Beth/Dave and family were wronged by aruba......WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE THAT....we ARE NOT going away.....

I agree, billb.  We do not have to take it, and we can just do what we do.  We ask questions,seek answers and want to bring justice. 

(and my post last night was not directed to you and it may have been someone else who prompted it.  It was for all). ...iirc, sports came into the mix last night, but we all tend to include personal things occasionally into our posts.
Thanks 2NJSons...
I felt bad contributing to OT...but I get caught up in the moment...
It's all good!.
Great post by Red letting us know we are on track for Justice for Natalee...


Just went back and re-read BillB.I believe it was my fault so i do apologize for taking you off topic! ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I read here everyday..I am in awe with what goes on here with the investigating skills of so many...all looking for Justice for Natalee.....
I only post late at night as I don't want to disrupt the flow...
I do feel a connection with SM because I see the injustice with Natalee's case...and I so hope and pray that day will come for Natalee.....
I enjoy the tit for tat with you, TM, and many others.....I always enjoyed ROBOTS comments, still look forward to Janet's posts (she tends to keep everyone grounded)....Kermit, Jen, all the Freebirds that were so kind to bring there story to SM....and of course Red for the opportunity allowing us all to be involved...Klaasend and all the wonderful mods...
Red really summed it up well this evening.....
In red above...should have said "kyle's own words"...
don't want Janet on my case.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:08:41 AM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::


Keepthefaith, Mere, ospainter, casa, billb, wreck, iris44, Anna, dottie, hotping, klaasend, Magnolia, rjdeer, Lifesong




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Mere on February 23, 2009, 01:09:37 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

Oh I do wish you well...!!  Fingers crossed and all those things...... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:12:06 AM
Kermit

WHAT WAS JOHN SILVETTI REALLY AFTER?

jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world. The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after.  It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found herI don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg625934#msg625934

Kyle:After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains


I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil[/u]...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.
Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


Kyle said: June 29, 2008: I'm curious if the birds connects the dots and figures out what John will do before he knows what he's doing. Well, he's a pretty shrewd businessman and usually thinks at least three steps ahead. We'll see how this plays out. I'll be at his house in about 5-6 hours."


KEEPTHEFAITH

Soliciting MONEY almost a month after you've left the waters of ARUBA???Where is the MONEY????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 01:20:31 AM
https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/

Remember these guys are the ones who brought back Butch Cassidy and the Sundance kid not to mention bringing down any number of mafia who have been untouchable otherwise.

Like RCMP, they never stop on a case once they have started.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 01:22:12 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

Oh I do wish you well...!!  Fingers crossed and all those things...... ::MonkeyDance::
Thank You Mere!  ::MonkeyCool::

Good Night Monkeys!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:23:57 AM
Mere...I've got a plan to find out about that PO Box in Kemah....I'll let You All know tomorrow if it works out.....Wish Me Luck! TIA  ::MonkeyWink::

My plan was to drive over and check out a few places....lol....bet yours is better...Mere
Well I used to live close enough to drive over but not any longer so I will have to use other means but all I can do is try.....like I said wish me luck..... ::MonkeyWink::

Oh I do wish you well...!!  Fingers crossed and all those things...... ::MonkeyDance::
Thank You Mere!  ::MonkeyCool::

Good Night Monkeys!

Goodnight and God Bless HotPing! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:31:47 AM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::


Keepthefaith, Mere, ospainter, casa, billb, wreck, iris44, Anna, dottie, hotping, klaasend, Magnolia, rjdeer, Lifesong




I wonder if GM will allow Casa to post this letter from RED in it's entirety??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 01:33:59 AM
https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/

Remember these guys are the ones who brought back Butch Cassidy and the Sundance kid not to mention bringing down any number of mafia who have been untouchable otherwise.

Like RCMP, they never stop on a case once they have started.



It says report suspicious charities to the local Postmaster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Mere on February 23, 2009, 01:34:19 AM
Keep having trouble with this dial-up....so good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:34:48 AM
Keep having trouble with this dial-up....so good night all.

Goodnight Mere!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:42:11 AM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!



Kermit
"Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.
Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:43:30 AM
Klaas.Can you delete  my post #451.Want to make sure the two quotes are in proper context.TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 23, 2009, 01:56:05 AM
Klaas.Can you delete  my post #451.Want to make sure the two quotes are in proper context.TIA

Done!

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 01:57:03 AM
Klaas.Can you delete  my post #451.Want to make sure the two quotes are in proper context.TIA

Done!

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Thanx Klaas!Goodnight and God Bless! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 02:01:59 AM
What a great way to start the week! ::MonkeyWink::

                               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

                                    GOODNIGHT & GOD BLESS

                                             KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 02:05:08 AM

Hey guys,

KTF - I bumped the post about the meeting because I'm curious about it too.



I have a question for any of those Silvetti/Kingman supporters, Janet.  I hope they will answer.

I hope they can back up John Silvetti's own words:

What one single piece of information, in who's confession, was the expansion of the search area based upon?

It may have been necessary to keep such a detail secret a year ago.  There's just no justification for keeping it secret now.

What one single piece of information, in who's confession, was the expansion of the search area based upon?






01/25/2008
 Special Notice:
By John Silvetti (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xiv-search-area.html) – “The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.  Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area.”

Months later [see 04/03/2008], John Silvetti comments further on the expansion of the search area (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989):  “The Persistence completed surveying the initial and extended grids.  Basically, this means that the sonar survey was completed.  Over 275 targets of interest were picked up and analyzed by the sonar interpreters.  Only 25% of the targets were investigated by the ROV.  At that point, we had run out of money and weather.  Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments.”



Quote
I'm sure it's Joran's confession to Patrick.  I have no doubt of that.

The same confession that wasn't good enough for a re-arrest, held a specific piece of information credible enough to increase the search grid by 200% with no concern for the cost.

I want to know what that one piece of information was.

I do not believe it.


BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 02:05:16 AM
One last thought before heading to the Monkey Bunkey. . . .

with regard to any upcoming searches, what could possibly be found in the pond that wasn't found when it was completely bone dry and was thoroughly searched looking for Jose Tromp?

How could anything of any significance have been missed in that one conducted under the ideal situation of complete dryness of the pond, etc.?

Just saying . . . . . .

Good nite, all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 05:56:35 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 07:38:52 AM

01/25/2008
 Special Notice:
By John Silvetti (http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xiv-search-area.html) – “The original search area surveyed by the R/V Persistence was selected based on numerous pieces of information provided by Dave Holloway, Tim Miller, investigations, interrogations, depositions and other information from local authorities. After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar.  Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis. Several targets in this first survey grid yet remain to be investigated by ROV which will occur in approximately one week when ROV dive operations recommence.  Selection of the next area, the “Extended Search Area”, was based on one single piece of information, a reported confession by one of the three suspects. This confession, as relayed to the survey team, has some credence. It involves the same type of disposal scenario, but better defines the search area.”


OffShore Innovative Solutions?

http://www.oisolutions.net/

I just caught that.

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-laedce/case_no-2:2008cv03758/case_id-127189/

Gulf South Marine Transportation & Logistics, LLC v. Offshore Innovative Solutions, Inc.

Plaintiff: Gulf South Marine Transportation & Logistics, LLC
Defendant: Offshore Innovative Solutions, Inc.
 
Case Number: 2:2008cv03758
Filed: June 19, 2008  
 
Court: Louisiana Eastern District Court
Office: Contract: Marine Office [ Court Info ]
County: Lafourche
Presiding Judge: Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Knowles III
 
Nature of Suit: Contract - Marine
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1333 Marine Contract




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on February 23, 2009, 08:53:50 AM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!

My own comment ... its also not like the family has specifically asked for help regarding certain things since 2005. Whether it be advice, news updates, research or translations.     

The fact of the matter is folks that there has been so much done for Natalee's family behind the scenes that goes unsaid, that they all know and have a direct line if they want to ask a question. They do not rely on third party discussion. Generally speaking over the years, family members have contacted us, not the other way around. I do not believe in burdening people who have lost so much.

The truth of the matter is that SM, Red personally, has a a relationship with members of Natalee's family and nothing anyone tries to do, say or lie about will change that fact. We have fought in the trenches together and have bonds outside of the internet and this case. There is nothing that internet trouble makers can do to break up friendships that exist in the real world.



Thank you RED...you have no idea how much I needed to read this today!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 08:56:03 AM
Lifesong

Check this out.....I have things to do this morning but I will BBL

Offshore Innovative Solutions

http://www.importgenius.com/importers/offshore-innovative-solutions.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 09:03:59 AM
As the Froggy also said!Watch the patterns..... ::MonkeyCool::


Without an explanation the patterns do not make sense when it comes to the upholding of CAPS.

Back in May, 2008 ... Mum and I were on the same page in regards to CAPS ... the same page I have been on since CAPS made his initial appearance at the end of January, 2008.

Somewhere along the way Mum jumped back on the CAPS bandwagon.  What changed?   It was not CAPS who changed.

Why do CAPS supporters never offer an explanation as to their reasoning in their decision to follow this guy wherever he may lead.  It is downright scary.

Justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family have definitely taken a backseat.

Janet

+++++++

MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1412 on: May 06, 2008, 01:59:31 PM »


SS...I have read that as well...I have also read where he said it was other apartments, Dutch owned and not the Matty apartments. I am not going to go back to the first thread and find Cap's posts as I questioned him more than a couple of times as to why he changed his mind and he never answered!

He also didn't respond as to why he told me no to the Ind/Lion's Den in the first thread.

All that being said...he hasn't backed up his posts...just because Caps said it, doesn't make it so!

 I am sorry I don't mean to upset you, but you can post Caps posts forever and I will just keep telling you what he said previously.

I still want to know why he changed from the other apartments to the Matty and he will not answer!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379364#msg379364


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1424 on: May 06, 2008, 02:41:59 PM »


SS…let me ask you one question…

If I post the Freddy Zedan owns the Indo/Lion’s Den are you going to just take my word for it?

 Caps posts that the Kalpoes - the father or the stepfather, he never did answer which one, according to a girl there, now own it!

You can certainly take what Caps says without questions, but I will not. So please do not repost Caps post to me....Show me the proof!

 I have read everyone of Cap’s post at least three times…each day I type out an index…you would be very surprised what you see on the third read.

All I am trying to say is what you are posting from Caps is not what he said in January!

I am 99% sure as to why he switched to the Indo apartments…the answer is in one of your last few posts…and I will leave it at that!

And yes Lala’s…I am extremely frustrated…seems we have involved just about everyone on Aruba…new names are dropped every week.…I never see Joran’s name in this thread anymore!!!!!

And everytime Caps appears we have more questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COLUMBO has a word for that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379383#msg379383


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1440 on: May 06, 2008, 06:42:17 PM »


Guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don't have to give him the benefit of the doubt just because he's Caps

All I see is a whole lot of new names and misinformation and very few facts...Giovanni, Deutekom, Bulo, Freddy that doesn't exist, odd-bods living at the kalpoes address, list of names that don't match the phone book...
 
Yes, something is going on at that pond, and we are still dealing with Aruba. I'm in total agreement with Lala's on this one, nothing will come of the pond.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379502#msg379502


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1450 on: May 06, 2008, 07:32:02 PM »


SS...A simple question as to if Deutekom was a Judge should have been answered 150 pages ago....so should the reason for him going back to the Indo/Lion's Den after he told me no to there. these are simple questions and both merit an answer!

I can't buy Cap's Dirty Hand Deutekom, because how he got to him was flawed. If he is not a Judge he wouldn't have been on that list. It is as simple as that!

There are more questions now than when Caps first started posting!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379518#msg379518


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1456 on: May 06, 2008, 11:11:21 PM »


Well I guess we are all frustrated today!

I attempted to explain to Caps at least 3 times the Judges list, and as one who tries to answer other poster’s questions, and acknowledge their posts I expected an answer on at least one of those occasions! If you have read my posts you would know that I have acknowledged that Deutekom may be a ‘Dirty Hand’ , just questioning the way he got there.

You can check my posts for this morning and see that I try to ‘share’ what I know! Have a look and see if my answer to another poster was even acknowledged!

I guess in your opinion it is OK for Caps to fire of all these questions at us, but he is not obligated to answer ours. Most of my questions to him have been about posts he has made and names like Bulo’s that we have never heard of. I have asked very few about things I am researching.

I have not asked any more from Caps than I would have asked from any other poster…back up your posts! BS on putting him in any sort of position! Not to the questions I have asked anyways.

Yes there are other theories on this thread, and I for one am sick and tired of having only one jammed down my throat.

I have read Caps posts many times and it is up to me if I go along with everything or anything he says.  Maybe it might help some if you let Caps know that it is creating problems by him dropping names with no other info….it would help a lot and certainly save some of us a lot of time….

JMHO

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379582#msg379582


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1459 on: May 06, 2008, 11:33:41 PM »


... as you said this is a discussion forum and I have reason to question things in Caps posts! Most times when I have done so I do not receive an answer or if I do it is the post of Caps I am referring to posted back to me. Sorry … to me that is not discussion.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379591#msg379591


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1467 on: May 07, 2008, 08:06:50 AM »


SS...Caps started posting in the NAH thread around mid-January. Klaas explained at the time that he had been posting on the front page previously. After 4 or 5 days Caps started posting in the Shango thread. This would have been way back in the first thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379694#msg379694


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1468 on: May 07, 2008, 09:28:28 AM »


SS… You are right. I think Caps has information that has nothing to do with Shango as well. Caps does know the corruption and the ‘dark’ side of Aruba. He knows some of the players, probably a lot.

When Caps first started posting in the forum he knew very little about the case, or so it appears from his early posts. He asked us about the family, the friends, the private plane and the pimps. He asked about the suspects and about the people such as Julia and others that continually misinformed us. He needed our help and knowledge with these pieces of the puzzle. There is nothing wrong with that, I personally have spent a lot of time and posts sharing any information I had or could find.

A lot of time it seems to me that Caps has a piece that he feels fits into a Shango/Simian/Merian post, and just makes it fit. He has the player, the corrupt official, so that is the answer to that part of the riddle.

An example of this would be ‘the yellowhammer’. We started with a yellow hummer way back in the first thread, and most disagreed back then. When it was revisited recently and many posted that they thought it was the bird, Caps said OK, we’ll go with the bird, we’ll refine and correct any errors in his interpretations. The next day, Caps posts that he doesn’t think it is the bird. Our interpretation of ‘the yellowhammer’ doesn’t fit into Cap’s deciphering of the riddle.

I find this very frustrating. To me it is not that difficult.

Thanks everyone for the input on Bulo yesterday. Pita sorry for the confusion I may have caused on the Benz site. Somehow I confused myself…Vms…sounds like a good idea…maybe clear up some loose ends like Giovanni and Bulo…

 I think I need to go and sit in the grandstand with Lala’s and the other grannies for a day or two and go back to my own research.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379700#msg379700


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1493 on: May 08, 2008, 09:33:46 AM »


This is a previous discussion about Ben VocKing. Below are 2 of Caps older posts regarding VocKing. So in February and March Caps knew who VocKing was, but not on April 25th.

Somewhere back around page 40 Caps posted a key in which he includes a pic of VocKing. You will notice that Caps refers to a picture of Voking in his response above.

Around pages 45 and 46 there is much discussion about the photo of VocKing and which is the correct one. The photo of VocKing that Caps included in his key and showed to the man who knew him very well is not of the person we determined to be VocKing.

This is why I ask questions…

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379920#msg379920


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1494 on: May 08, 2008, 09:41:12 AM »


These posts of Caps have been etched in mind since March. Another reason I ask questions.

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379922#msg379922


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1495 on: May 08, 2008, 10:12:11 AM »


Here is Cap's picture of Vocking.

Hotping...Thanks for the prayer. After the posts from last night, for the sake of harmony I have decided to refrain from posting in this thread any more.

Enjoy the Tango!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379926#msg379926


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1500 on: May 08, 2008, 11:55:52 AM
»

Vms…I have suspected from very early on from Cap’s posts who Caps really is. I did not come to this conclusion from any mailing list from ‘our friend in Aruba’. Posts over the last 24 hours have confirmed my suspicions. Not everyone is whom they appear to be…I need to walk away!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379938#msg379938


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #750 5/2 -
« Reply #936 on: May 08, 2008, 08:30:49 PM »


SS…since you bought this over from the Shango thread….there is no group attack on Caps. I have asked him to answer questions about his posts. He has not done so, on most occasions IMO. I said this morning that I would walk away. I have.

Many of my questions regarding Caps surround Ben Vocking. I posted on that this morning. Please go back and read from page 39 to page 46 of the thread. Open the links. Read Caps response very carefully and then read what I posted this morning.

I am not going to respond any further on the subject.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2819.msg380072#msg380072


++++++++


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #454 on: January 02, 2009, 11:06:23 PM »


Janet...You are like a pitbull...LOL

Nobody knows my position on this at this time...I am not ready to elaborate any more...I am Sorry.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609545;topicseen#msg609545


Janet - I meant to thank you on Saturday for posting this.  It is puzzling, to be sure.  Though I also found it encouraging in some way to see that Mum wasn't buying it.  I wish she would explain to us what changed.

I've been reading in Finngirl's thread We Forgot We Knew (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2768.0).  Interesting stuff there too.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 09:08:29 AM
Lifesong

Check this out.....I have things to do this morning but I will BBL

Offshore Innovative Solutions

http://www.importgenius.com/importers/offshore-innovative-solutions.html


Heh heh heh heh!!

You did not just pull that out of your back pocket!  Love it...wow.  Shipping an ROV on 2-28-08 from LA to UK.

What else ya got?   ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::

Good luck today!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 09:10:21 AM


Good Morning, Monkeys!

I've been in the old threads from a year ago, 2-26-08 to 3-02-08.  It's heartbreaking to read back through, really.

But, I need some help this morning...here's a quote from Silvetti posted at BFN:  "Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could.  However, that was all based on the initial survey grid.  Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments." (http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334989#msg334989)

I've not yet found any "official" explanation as to why the initial survey grid was tripled

Can anyone help me out with this?




Lifesong - I'm just now trying to catch up with this thread, so if this has been answered - please ignore.

Kyle told us that Richardson wanted them searching out in deeper waters.  This was right after they dove on the trap.

THAT is the reason the search grid tripled - Silvetti did what Richardson said.

Perhaps Kermit has that quote of Kyle's.

What we have learned since then - any boat going out further than 2 miles would have been picked up on Aruba's radar.

Deeper water/out past 2miles = drawing attention to themselves.

Not a likely thing for Paulus to do, IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 09:44:58 AM
This is from Lifesong's timeline:

01/23/2008
An Aruban journalist posts at RU:  “The Persistence might have found "something" The prosecutor's Office has just been informed recently that the Persistence crew might have found something and currently forensic testings are under way. If it has to do with the Natalee Holloway case or any way related or crucial to the investigation, has yet to be determined.

I reckon that was Renfro that posted at RU.


Not Renfro - it was "MF".

Interesting, no?  The prosecutor's office was just recently informed on/about Jan 23rd?  Yet - the items were collected on Jan 7th....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 10:00:53 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



I'm not kermit.........but that was September 11, 2008


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 10:03:15 AM
RED - thank you for making the time to catch up with Beth, and for relaying some of her words here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 10:05:45 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



I'm not kermit.........but that was September 11, 2008


Thanks, Jen.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 10:11:24 AM
klaas and lifesong - this might be of interest to you both, in light of the conversations earlier in this thread.

This addresses both the increased grid size, and Tim Miller being removed from Persistence.

Just so nothing is accused of being taken out of context, before Kyle's informative post - I also included MY OWN to him with some questions.  If Tim approached Silvetti with this action plan Tim and Kyle discussed, that may have been the final catalyst that had Tim ejected from the Persistence by Silvetti:

posted by me:

Hey Kyle, I have a question.

I know you've never told us the reason that Tim Miller was no longer welcome onboard the Persistence.

I'm just wondering if that timing coincided with Silvetti's sudden lack of interest in that trap and its contents?

The timing seems about right, from what we've been able to piece together.

Did John and Tim have the same difference of opinion that you and John had?

Haven't seen you here for a bit Kyle - hope everything is going well for you. 



kyle wrote:

You're correct. This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present). After the Dec 30th dive John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability. I don't know what that exactly means, but Tim wasn't hurting anything except releasing the statements to the press and Holloways that we found Natalee. Although likely true, it was premature and should have been replaced with action- seeing that the evidence was collected and handled properly.

I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.

On the night of the 30th (I believe this was Tim's last night on the Persistence) I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it. I hadn't slept in 48 hours. I crashed for a few hours rest and by the time I got up Dateline and Tim Miller had left the boat. That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks. Richardson told us after the Jan-7th dive to keep searching in deep water. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn.

Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean". Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 23, 2009, 10:57:38 AM
Janet - that's why I want Tim Miller to answer if he was on board or not.  I want verification from Tim.

Thanks Klaas, that`ll take away some questions  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:10:32 AM
klaas and lifesong - this might be of interest to you both, in light of the conversations earlier in this thread.

This addresses both the increased grid size, and Tim Miller being removed from Persistence.

Just so nothing is accused of being taken out of context, before Kyle's informative post - I also included MY OWN to him with some questions.  If Tim approached Silvetti with this action plan Tim and Kyle discussed, that may have been the final catalyst that had Tim ejected from the Persistence by Silvetti:

posted by me:

Hey Kyle, I have a question.

I know you've never told us the reason that Tim Miller was no longer welcome onboard the Persistence.

I'm just wondering if that timing coincided with Silvetti's sudden lack of interest in that trap and its contents?

The timing seems about right, from what we've been able to piece together.

Did John and Tim have the same difference of opinion that you and John had?

Haven't seen you here for a bit Kyle - hope everything is going well for you. 



kyle wrote:

You're correct. This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present). After the Dec 30th dive John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability. I don't know what that exactly means, but Tim wasn't hurting anything except releasing the statements to the press and Holloways that we found Natalee. Although likely true, it was premature and should have been replaced with action- seeing that the evidence was collected and handled properly.

I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.

On the night of the 30th (I believe this was Tim's last night on the Persistence) I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it. I hadn't slept in 48 hours. I crashed for a few hours rest and by the time I got up Dateline and Tim Miller had left the boat. That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks. Richardson told us after the Jan-7th dive to keep searching in deep water. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn.

Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean". Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities".

Jen ... Thanks.

I realize that Tim Trahan was on the December 30th dive ... that thumbs down dive but ... was he a participant in the the December 29th dive?

I believe that Tim Trahan is the the catalyst to what actually was in that trap/cage ... he observed it first hand.

I cannot comprehend what bait Kyle Kingsman, Louis Shaefer and Tim Trahan were dangling to the major networds and Peter Devries ... IF the ROV images did not reveal something case related,  Obviously ... Tim Trahan must have observed more than "NOTHING" as he claimed following the December 30th dive.  The major networks are not interested in "NOTHING".

Janet

+++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal

Kyle:  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 11:12:42 AM
klaas and lifesong - this might be of interest to you both, in light of the conversations earlier in this thread.

This addresses both the increased grid size, and Tim Miller being removed from Persistence.

Just so nothing is accused of being taken out of context, before Kyle's informative post - I also included MY OWN to him with some questions.  If Tim approached Silvetti with this action plan Tim and Kyle discussed, that may have been the final catalyst that had Tim ejected from the Persistence by Silvetti:

posted by me:

Hey Kyle, I have a question.

I know you've never told us the reason that Tim Miller was no longer welcome onboard the Persistence.

I'm just wondering if that timing coincided with Silvetti's sudden lack of interest in that trap and its contents?

The timing seems about right, from what we've been able to piece together.

Did John and Tim have the same difference of opinion that you and John had?

Haven't seen you here for a bit Kyle - hope everything is going well for you. 



kyle wrote:

You're correct. This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present). After the Dec 30th dive John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability. I don't know what that exactly means, but Tim wasn't hurting anything except releasing the statements to the press and Holloways that we found Natalee. Although likely true, it was premature and should have been replaced with action- seeing that the evidence was collected and handled properly.

I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.

On the night of the 30th (I believe this was Tim's last night on the Persistence) I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it. I hadn't slept in 48 hours. I crashed for a few hours rest and by the time I got up Dateline and Tim Miller had left the boat. That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks. Richardson told us after the Jan-7th dive to keep searching in deep water. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn.

Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean". Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities".

Jen ... Thanks.

I realize that Tim Trahan was on the December 30th dive ... that thumbs down dive but ... was he a participant in the the December 29th dive?

I believe that Tim Trahan is the the catalyst to what actually was in that trap/cage ... he observed it first hand.

I cannot comprehend what bait Kyle Kingsman, Louis Shaefer and Tim Trahan were dangling to the major networds and Peter Devries ... IF the ROV images did not reveal something case related,  Obviously ... Tim Trahan must have observed more than "NOTHING" as he claimed following the December 30th dive.  The major networks are not interested in "NOTHING".

Janet

+++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal

Kyle:  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

LOGIC DICTATES JANET! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:13:35 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



I'm not kermit.........but that was September 11, 2008

Again ... what does Tim Trahan have to offer if there was "NOTHING" related to the Natalee Holloway case inside that trap/cage.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 11:13:57 AM
Janet - On Dec 29th, there were no divers in the water - only the ROV went down.  And yes, Tim Miller was aboard for that.  As was Dateline.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 11:14:21 AM
Good Morning to you Monkey's!What a beautiful morning!Keep Rolling.. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 11:15:31 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



I'm not kermit.........but that was September 11, 2008

Again ... what does Tim Trahan have to offer if there was "NOTHING" related to the Natalee Holloway case inside that trap/cage.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

Kyle explained that "thumbs down" signal given by Tim Trahan.

He states there was no pre-determined signal, if Tim simply couldn't tell by a visual only inspection.

Tim simply couldn't tell.  Thus the thumbs down signal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:21:09 AM

I realize that Tim Trahan was on the December 30th dive ... that thumbs down dive but ... was he a participant in the the December 29th dive?

I believe that Tim Trahan is the the catalyst to what actually was in that trap/cage ... he observed it first hand.

I cannot comprehend what bait Kyle Kingsman, Louis Shaefer and Tim Trahan were dangling to the major networds and Peter Devries ... IF the ROV images did not reveal something case related,  Obviously ... Tim Trahan must have observed more than "NOTHING" as he claimed following the December 30th dive.  The major networks are not interested in "NOTHING".

Janet

+++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal

Kyle:  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

LOGIC DICTATES JANET! ::MonkeyWink::


Good Morning Keepthefaith.

I believe that logic dictates but ... I am also in a twilight zone.  Maybe I need a real strong cuppa Tim Horton's coffee.

Think about it.  If logic dictates and ... Dave Holloway is aware of Kyle Kingman's own words ... why is Natalee Holloway's father still involved with John Silvetti?  If logic dictates and ... Tim Miller is aware of Kyle Kingman's own words ... why is he still professionally  associated with John Silvetti?

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

Janet

++++++ 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 11:22:03 AM
klaas and lifesong - this might be of interest to you both, in light of the conversations earlier in this thread.

This addresses both the increased grid size, and Tim Miller being removed from Persistence.

Just so nothing is accused of being taken out of context, before Kyle's informative post - I also included MY OWN to him with some questions.  If Tim approached Silvetti with this action plan Tim and Kyle discussed, that may have been the final catalyst that had Tim ejected from the Persistence by Silvetti:

posted by me:

Hey Kyle, I have a question.

I know you've never told us the reason that Tim Miller was no longer welcome onboard the Persistence.

I'm just wondering if that timing coincided with Silvetti's sudden lack of interest in that trap and its contents?

The timing seems about right, from what we've been able to piece together.

Did John and Tim have the same difference of opinion that you and John had?

Haven't seen you here for a bit Kyle - hope everything is going well for you. 



kyle wrote:

You're correct. This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present). After the Dec 30th dive John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability. I don't know what that exactly means, but Tim wasn't hurting anything except releasing the statements to the press and Holloways that we found Natalee. Although likely true, it was premature and should have been replaced with action- seeing that the evidence was collected and handled properly.

I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.

On the night of the 30th (I believe this was Tim's last night on the Persistence) I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it. I hadn't slept in 48 hours. I crashed for a few hours rest and by the time I got up Dateline and Tim Miller had left the boat. That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks. Richardson told us after the Jan-7th dive to keep searching in deep water. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn.

Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean". Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities".

Jen, thank you so much.  It's even more powerful to see it put together by Kyle this way.

Btw, if you all have a preference as to how all of these statements from Kyle could or should be sourced it would put me at ease.  Since Kyle has made threats of legal action over confidentiality agreements and perhaps copyrights, I don't want to overstep, or put you in a more vulnerable position, if that makes sense.

I think right now I have a mix of no links, just the statements posted, and some random links to posts here in the forum by Kermit, Wingnut and yourself.  I'm not sure if it even matters, but would rather you guys get to decide that.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 23, 2009, 11:25:42 AM


No I shouldn't; however, sadly some need to see the truth rather than the bs fabrications and misrepresentations that some wish to put out there.

SM was the very first blog discussing this case for obvious reasons. Namely my past associations with Aruba and people in Aruba.

I was the first to go to Aruba and search for Natalee, digging side by side Dave Holloway in the landfill. Long before it became en vogue for going to Aruba, playing Sam Spade to get reward money for finding NH, there was SM. Long before deals were made with Date Line, there was Red discussing the daily landfill search on Court TV.

Long before there was a water search, there was a land search that was done with all the persistence in the world trying to find Natalee on Aruba. I would love to paint a rosy, cheery picture that everyone felt good after the search like what was done when the Persistence left Aruba ... but I cannot and will not.

Frankly, after nearly 2 weeks of searching for Natalee with the pond searches, digging in the landfill and scouring Aruba with no traces of Natalee and leaving Aruba ... I personally felt terrible. I thought so many times we had found her, like when we searched the VDS's neighbors property. There is nothing worse in the world than not accomplishing one's goal. There is no amount of trying your best or putting your best effort forward that rids one of that feeling. Just trying in my book does not cut it, success is defined by meeting one's goals, not just making an effort, That is why there is still unfinished business when it come to Natalee.

The goal has always been to bring Natalee home and provide Justice for Natalee. Not just make an effort. Not do things because you make yourself feel better. Or do things because it brings attention upon yourself and say look at me.

For all the stupid and ignorant comments I have read since May 2005 in that respect, those that make such uninformed comments have not a clue. You people have no idea what makes me tick and what makes the many good hearted people at SM tick. So you should really stop trying to think you do.

For those of you that continue with the ignorance of Red writing a book ... grow up. Maybe you can provide me with a title as well. Some of the jealousy and haters on the internet are really old and tired. We have dealt with this from near the beginning of this case when Aruba actually paid people to cause havoc.

The point in many respects was to also get out the message to people who did not follow the case that Natalee was still missing and that Aruba has still done nothing. It was not to selfishly preach to the choir or have info on private or member only sites. What the hell is the point in that? What purpose does that serve?

There is a reason why SM posts on numerous stories other than just crime or missing persons. That is so that people who do not normally follow such stories also can read about these cases. Its called getting the story out to eyes that are not familiar with the facts at hand. There is a reason why SM has over at present almost 16.5 million visitors and 49.5 million page views since 2005.  There is a reason why we have a separate Missing Persons site, Radio Show and now True Crime blog.

The vision of SM is to have important stories seen and heard by as many people as possible. We believe in developing relationships with victims of crime, Law Enforcement and Search Teams. The vision of SM to to help victims of crime by overtly by communication and behind the scenes.

One would think that if people really were for Natalee Holloway and Natalee's family that the petty jealousies would be put aside for the sake of the family. People really need to look in the mirror and look internally at their souls and ask themselves why they are doing things.

Personally, I could care less what other blogs do ... they have their own site owners. Barring certain internet courtesy's, they do as they wish as that is their right. No one has to read at them if you do not like what they have to say. The same holds true here. It fascinates me that people actually read a site that they cannot stand and then post about it elsewhere. We know what goes on other sites and what is said. At the so-called private sites. Please, there is nothing private on the web. Frankly, who has time for hate when the point is to provide help.

There are few complete truths in life; however, one of them is that no one will agree on everything. That is why there is a little thing called free speech. Some where, some place out there, water will find its own level and everyone on the internet will find there own home. There is freedom of speech; however, there is no freedom that people have to listen or agree with you.

Scared Monkeys always has been a victims rights blog/forum and dedicated to making a difference. People's hate and petty jealousies are not going to stop that. The site has been read by millions and will continue to be read by millions more.

Very few places exist where individuals comments are read by so many.

We have had Natalee's family support from the beginning and will continue to do so. No one knows loss more than Beth Holloway and very few people have had the opportunity to see that sadness up close and person as I have. When it occurs its nearly brings me to tears; however, then it makes me even stronger to finish the job and continue fighting for the family.

That's what this is about to all the misguided individuals out there. Getting results for victims. Those that would want to stop such an effort may want to question why they claim to be for the family.

Sorry for the rant, but felt it was needed.

Thanks for the wonderful words Red! Touching also.

May God Bless You and let nobody forget what it`s all about . . Justice for Natalee

Just non selfish Truth and Justice


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 11:27:33 AM
Lifesong,

Since referencing an actual link to the Freebird forum would do the reader no good (membership only), I would suggest simply sourcing them with Kyle's email addy listed beneath.

It is unfortunate that events took this turn, rather than a document being published and distributed - but at this point we can only do what we can do.

So an email addy listed would at least source the quotes/statements directly to Kyle.

Or perhaps a link directly to his online resume?  Then at least the reader would know who he is, what he does for a living, and what his qualifications are.

Those are just my personal thoughts on the question - I'm sure others will chime in with possibly better solutions.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 11:33:58 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



I'm not kermit.........but that was September 11, 2008

Again ... what does Tim Trahan have to offer if there was "NOTHING" related to the Natalee Holloway case inside that trap/cage.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

That is the $64,000 question, Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 23, 2009, 11:34:45 AM
I'm always amazed at the views my Webshot site of the Coolaruba search photos from June 2005 get.  158 views this week.

http://travel.webshots.com/album/549377093ygMAui?start=0

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/webshots.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 23, 2009, 11:37:00 AM
Altough I believe this was not the first letter  . . this is a screencap of a letter that was on dateline

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep_5_.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:38:43 AM

Good Morning!


Kermit -

Can you put a date with this?

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday.
 Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

TIA!



I'm not kermit.........but that was September 11, 2008

Again ... what does Tim Trahan have to offer if there was "NOTHING" related to the Natalee Holloway case inside that trap/cage.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

Kyle explained that "thumbs down" signal given by Tim Trahan.

He states there was no pre-determined signal, if Tim simply couldn't tell by a visual only inspection.

Tim simply couldn't tell.  Thus the thumbs down signal.

If Tim Trahan could not determine what was inside that cage/trap what in the world does he have to offer in regards to major network deals ... major networks deal that involves him, Kyle Kingman and John Shaefer.

It does not make sense.

Tim Trahan is definite in the Dateline special that he observed nothing case related in the trap/cage.  He give no indication that he was unable to determine.

Janet

+++++++

The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap.

They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.  

The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap.

The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat)

No it's thumbs down.

Negative, not it.  

Crushing disppointment.

(On the boat)

Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?  

Trahan: No.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:40:38 AM
Altough I believe this was not the first letter  . . this is a screencap of a letter that was on dateline

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep_5_.jpg)



bastibro ... could you provide a source.  I am unable to read the words.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 11:43:46 AM
Janet -

IIRC, the signal was to be one thumbs up for positively seeing human remains.

Two thumbs up for something to positively identify those remains as Natalee.

From visual only, according to Kyle, Tim Trahan simply couldn't tell.  He also made reference to a large skate that swam by right before the visual took place - stirring up sediment from the bottom and clouding vision.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 11:47:53 AM
Altough I believe this was not the first letter  . . this is a screencap of a letter that was on dateline

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep_5_.jpg)



bastibro ... could you provide a source.  I am unable to read the words.

Thank you.

Janet

Janet, this is another screen shot from the Dateline special....the email from Marcos to Dave Holloway.  Blonde has a shot in her Search for Natalee thread:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.80


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Patriot on February 23, 2009, 11:52:28 AM
klaas and lifesong - this might be of interest to you both, in light of the conversations earlier in this thread.

This addresses both the increased grid size, and Tim Miller being removed from Persistence.

Just so nothing is accused of being taken out of context, before Kyle's informative post - I also included MY OWN to him with some questions.  If Tim approached Silvetti with this action plan Tim and Kyle discussed, that may have been the final catalyst that had Tim ejected from the Persistence by Silvetti:

posted by me:

Hey Kyle, I have a question.

I know you've never told us the reason that Tim Miller was no longer welcome onboard the Persistence.

I'm just wondering if that timing coincided with Silvetti's sudden lack of interest in that trap and its contents?

The timing seems about right, from what we've been able to piece together.

Did John and Tim have the same difference of opinion that you and John had?

Haven't seen you here for a bit Kyle - hope everything is going well for you. 



kyle wrote:

You're correct. This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present). After the Dec 30th dive John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability. I don't know what that exactly means, but Tim wasn't hurting anything except releasing the statements to the press and Holloways that we found Natalee. Although likely true, it was premature and should have been replaced with action- seeing that the evidence was collected and handled properly.

I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.

On the night of the 30th (I believe this was Tim's last night on the Persistence) I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it. I hadn't slept in 48 hours. I crashed for a few hours rest and by the time I got up Dateline and Tim Miller had left the boat. That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks. Richardson told us after the Jan-7th dive to keep searching in deep water. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn.

Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean". Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities".

Thanks Jen!
This post for me sums it up very nicely IMO.
The game was fixed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 11:52:38 AM
klaas and lifesong - this might be of interest to you both, in light of the conversations earlier in this thread.

This addresses both the increased grid size, and Tim Miller being removed from Persistence.

Just so nothing is accused of being taken out of context, before Kyle's informative post - I also included MY OWN to him with some questions.  If Tim approached Silvetti with this action plan Tim and Kyle discussed, that may have been the final catalyst that had Tim ejected from the Persistence by Silvetti:

posted by me:

Hey Kyle, I have a question.

I know you've never told us the reason that Tim Miller was no longer welcome onboard the Persistence.

I'm just wondering if that timing coincided with Silvetti's sudden lack of interest in that trap and its contents?

The timing seems about right, from what we've been able to piece together.

Did John and Tim have the same difference of opinion that you and John had?

Haven't seen you here for a bit Kyle - hope everything is going well for you. 



kyle wrote:

You're correct. This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present). After the Dec 30th dive John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability. I don't know what that exactly means, but Tim wasn't hurting anything except releasing the statements to the press and Holloways that we found Natalee. Although likely true, it was premature and should have been replaced with action- seeing that the evidence was collected and handled properly.

I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.

On the night of the 30th (I believe this was Tim's last night on the Persistence) I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it. I hadn't slept in 48 hours. I crashed for a few hours rest and by the time I got up Dateline and Tim Miller had left the boat. That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks. Richardson told us after the Jan-7th dive to keep searching in deep water. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn.

Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean". Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities".

The more I read this, the more questions I have.  This may be one of those times a "state the obvious" post from a kind monkey is where its at for me...

1.  This occurred on Dec 30th  when the Arubans told us there wasn't anything of interest in the trap based on the visual-only inspection (Dateline and Tim Miller present).

What?  The Arubans?  On December 30th?  What is Tim Trahan?  Why did we have an American diver if he couldn't see or speak?  I don't even begin to understand this.

2.  I approached Tim and proposed some ideas to him. I suggested that we shouldn't take the Aruban Polis divers at their word and proceed with planning a recovery of the trap. Also, I proposed the trap site may not be pristine or the Polis may have already knew about it. This statement was backed up by several comments we heard, behavior we observed, and other things. Tim told me he thought I was right but didn't know what to do about it.

I assume, I believe correctly, that by Tim he means Tim Miller.  I don't understand that.  Why didn't he go to Tim Trahan?  This story just sounds so biased toward Kyle's ego I'm having a hard time believing it.  He proposed the trap site may not be pristine?  Really?  That hadn't occurred to anyone else?  Maybe I'm being too hard on him, but I don't understand why he didn't go to Trahan and Silvetti, but went to Miller who he already knew Silvetti didn't want around anymore.

3.  That is when John assumed full control over the remainder of the project and had us searching in the deepest portions of our search area which coincided with Richardson's remarks.

So...John Silvetti did not have full control over the project until after Tim Miller was gone?  It was his boat...I don't understand that.  Whose approval did he need to take full control - Schaefer's or Dave's?  And Richardson's remarks...I don't even know where to begin.

How is Richardson in any way an authoritative voice in the ocean search being conducted as a charitable endeavor to benefit the Holloway family?

I'll stop there before I further confuse myself.  I think I'm asking rhetorical questions at this point anyway.

Yes...I'm thinking I'm gonna need a 'state the obvious' post.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 11:58:01 AM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 12:01:03 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: Lifesong.  I hear ya!

Tim Miller and John Silvetti were both "project leads" according to Kyle.

Once Miller was gone, Silvetti was the only "project lead" left aboard.

Convenient, no?

Remember also - according to Kyle - Tim Trahan was also off the boat before the Jan 7th dive took place.

Kyle never detailed for us the reason why Trahan was off the boat, but remember - Trahan was on board with Kyle in exposing this info (as well as Shaefer) although we never did learn if those reasons for Trahn were solely monetary in nature, or if they had a humanitarian influence as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:01:18 PM
Janet -

IIRC, the signal was to be one thumbs up for positively seeing human remains.

Two thumbs up for something to positively identify those remains as Natalee.

From visual only, according to Kyle, Tim Trahan simply couldn't tell.  He also made reference to a large skate that swam by right before the visual took place - stirring up sediment from the bottom and clouding vision.


Thank jen.

It still does not make sense to me.   If the truth was were it was at ... logic would dictates that the Aruban divers and Tim Trahan let the Skate pass ... wait a minute for the silt to settle and ... observe as well as take photos of the contents.

I contend that a furthering of the coverup which has prevented justice from prevailing for an American citized was planned in a meeting on board the Persistence a short time prior to the December 30th dive.

I suspect after the Arubans were made aware of the contents of the cage from the December 29th dive ... immediate damage control was where it was at.

It is my opinion that just prior to the second dive on December 30, 2007 ... a meeting was held by the Aruban with John Silvetti.  I speculate that at this meeting ... justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closurer for her family took a back seat and ... for an incentive ... John Silvetti became a participant in "the finale to the great Aruban coverup".

Considering Tim Trahan dove with the Aruban dive team on December 30, 2007 ... I contend that this American also became a player in the betrayal.  In otherwords ... the "thumbs down" was a given.

IMO

Janet

_____


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment.

Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me

Kyle: Mr. Red shirt came on the Persistence along with Dolf, Mos, et al for the meeting on the 30th."

Kyle:   This is certainly NOT John Silvetti. I do not know this man. He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.

Edit:  fixed date  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 12:02:33 PM


Thanks Jen!
This post for me sums it up very nicely IMO.
The game was fixed!

YW Patriot.

Yes, there is every indication it was fixed.

Just as PI posted here last year.  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 12:03:38 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:06:55 PM

<snipped>

Edit:  fixed date  


Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:10:15 PM
Red's posts submitted to forum last night provided such encouragement.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on February 23, 2009, 12:17:03 PM
Just a quick drive by (hee, hee hee).

Great post by Red.  In the early days, when I was young and very green, I read the reasons that Red and Tom started this blog.  I never doubted the sincerity or intent of SM.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:17:23 PM
Red's posts submitted to forum last night provided such encouragement.

Janet


Yes it did Janet! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:18:06 PM
Altough I believe this was not the first letter  . . this is a screencap of a letter that was on dateline

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/msnbcHollowayteamsearchesthedeep_5_.jpg)



bastibro ... could you provide a source.  I am unable to read the words.

Thank you.

Janet

Janet, this is another screen shot from the Dateline special....the email from Marcos to Dave Holloway.  Blonde has a shot in her Search for Natalee thread:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.80

Thank you 2NJSons_Mom.

Hey ... who is Marco?  Does he have a history in regards to the Natalee Holloway case prior to this apparent diversion to get Tim Miller off the Persistence?

Thanks

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 12:29:30 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:32:02 PM
Thank you Monkeys for waiting for me to finish my toasted bagel with cream cheese, tomato and cucumber as well as my tea.

We can not proceed with the discussion at hand.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:33:17 PM
Thank you Monkeys for waiting for me to finish my toasted bagel with cream cheese, tomato and cucumber as well as my tea.

We can now proceed with the discussion at hand.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

Edit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 12:35:49 PM
Thank you Monkeys for waiting for me to finish my toasted bagel with cream cheese, tomato and cucumber as well as my tea.

We can now proceed with the discussion at hand.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

Edit


 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  That was too funny!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:41:26 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



When I consider some of CAPS posts upholding Dave Holloway and Julie Renfro while undermining Jug Twitty and Beth Holloway ... Mark Purcell or somebody connected to Mark Purcell comes to mind.

I could be wrong.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 12:44:01 PM
Lifesong, I do not know who Caps is any more than I know who you are.   ::MonkeyHaHa::   AND, if you think I have ironed anything in the past couple of weeks...well, you would be WRONG.     ::MonkeyTongue:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 12:44:28 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 12:52:04 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


And, seems like I remember somebody just falling apart at the mention of Chows.  I think it was one of those two I keep getting confused...

I still maintain at least one post from Caps was either written by or contributed to by Kyle. 

JMO & only MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 12:54:38 PM
Lifesong, I do not know who Caps is any more than I know who you are.   ::MonkeyHaHa::   AND, if you think I have ironed anything in the past couple of weeks...well, you would be WRONG.     ::MonkeyTongue:: 

Ironing ... what is that!

You put a "bounce sheet" in your dryer along with the wet clothing ... set the timer to five minute prior to the end of the cycle ... run downstairs when timer goes off ... open the dryer door ... remove clothing and ... fold and hang up as those your life depended on it.

A little ironing as far as creating a crease in sleeves and slacks prior to wearing is acceptable but ... not necessary.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 12:56:50 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


And, seems like I remember somebody just falling apart at the mention of Chows.  I think it was one of those two I keep getting confused...

I still maintain at least one post from Caps was either written by or contributed to by Kyle. 

JMO & only MO


LifeSong.This was a post from Kermit when we were discussing CapsLockWizard.Don't know if it will help!

Kermit
Albert Vrolijk
* friends with Satish
* He is a DJ at CAFE BAHIA
His website has Satish posting there
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/4778/image497cm2.jpg


Gabe said thats my cousin..meaning Albert Vrolijk=panty boy
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=3940&start=980

Albert Vrolijk = Simian



Clyde Burke is Caps friend

Aruba Tourism Authority - Vernon Vrolijk (regional rep in Atlanta, GA)


Caps likes chow chows.

March 3 - John meets with Caps

Caps recap:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.740
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.720

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.840
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 12:59:24 PM

Here's a refresher on Marcos, thanks to Janet...

Funny, this part at the beginning reminds me of how Caps showed up immediately trying to reach the family (namely Dave) and get him to come right away to claim Natalee's body.  That's creepy.



Quote
Tamikosmom

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #779 11/24/08 -
Reply #852 on: November 25, 2008, 09:43:28 PM  (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.msg558290#msg558290)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATALEE'S REMAINS ARE TAKEN TO NICARAGUA???

The search for Natalee Holloway
It's the story you haven't heard: the tale of two parents who, even now, will go anywhere -- and endure anything -- to find answers.

TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008

Dave Holloway: ... To be sure there was no relevant evidence, material from the trap was given to the FBI. For the Holloways, though, another wild ride began.

This bizarre story originated in the central American nation of Nicaragua.

It happened last month, when Natalee’s father Dave received a message from a man who called himself Marcos. He said he had important information about where they could find Natalee's body

Dave Holloway: He said, "I’d done some wrongs in my past," and he said, "This is my way of making all of my wrongs and all of my sins and doing something right."

Dave was skeptical, but the phone and e-mail messages continued.

In them was a wild tale involving drug runners who said that on the night Natalee disappeared someone had paid them to take her body and dump it at sea.

They agreed but instead they took her remains with them to Nicaragua and hid them on a remote strip of the Atlantic coast.

Dave Holloway: It was a little bit far-fetched for me.

Chris Hansen: What did he want in return?

Dave Holloway: He told us he didn't want anything. And that is what part I started believing in this guy. I said we've got a reward out here.

In January, Dave Holloway asked Tim Miller to head to Nicaragua to arrange for a meeting...and to Miller's surprise, Marcos showed up.

Marcos: I didn't live an, um, exemplary life. I did a lot of wrong things and maybe this is just one way of trying to even up the, the score a little bit.

Marcos wouldn't allow his face to appear on camera, but he agreed to talk to Miller and even officials from the US embassy.

Chris Hansen: And what was the person from the embassy's take?

Tim Miller: The person from the embassy said, "You know what? I think we may have something here."

Together, Miller and Marcos came up with a plan: Marcos would take a GPS receiver to the location and leave it there. Miller, accompanied by local officials would follow the signal to the location and begin to dig.

The next morning Miller's phone rang. It was Marcos. The search, he said, had been a success. But there had been a change in plans. He had the body and would bring it to them in Managua.

Marcos: Tonight before the sun is up, we will be in Managua.

Tim Miller: He says that she was wrapped in a blanket and her body fell apart. He said, "but we had to put her in two ice chests." And he actually said, "call Mr. Holloway right now and tell him I’ve got Natalee."

Chris Hansen: So what do you do?

Tim Miller: I did not call Dave Holloway to say I have the body.

Chris Hansen: You've been down that road before.

Tim Miller: I’ve been down that road before.

Chris Hansen: Did you believe him?

Tim Miller: This time, I believed him.

But after waiting all night for Marcos to appear at the arranged location -- nothing.

Marcos never appeared again and Tim Miller and Dave Holloway are convinced Marcos pulled off an incredibly cruel hoax.

Dave Holloway: How would somebody stoop so low to do something like this?

Chris Hansen: How hurtful is that, when somebody does that to you?

Dave Holloway: Very hurtful. In fact, that was -- it's a wonders I’ve not had a major heart attack and died, you know.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 01:01:52 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


And, seems like I remember somebody just falling apart at the mention of Chows.  I think it was one of those two I keep getting confused...

I still maintain at least one post from Caps was either written by or contributed to by Kyle. 

JMO & only MO


Yeah and he's in his 50s.  I don't want to know for any sinister reason.  I just think
it would help to put his posts into perspective.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 01:30:14 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


And, seems like I remember somebody just falling apart at the mention of Chows.  I think it was one of those two I keep getting confused...

I still maintain at least one post from Caps was either written by or contributed to by Kyle. 

JMO & only MO


Yeah and he's in his 50s.  I don't want to know for any sinister reason.  I just think
it would help to put his posts into perspective.

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992

 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 02:01:19 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


And, seems like I remember somebody just falling apart at the mention of Chows.  I think it was one of those two I keep getting confused...

I still maintain at least one post from Caps was either written by or contributed to by Kyle. 

JMO & only MO


Yeah and he's in his 50s.  I don't want to know for any sinister reason.  I just think
it would help to put his posts into perspective.

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992

 



What does MUI stand for?  I tried to figure it out a few days ago. ::MonkeyConfused::
I am sure it is something very obvious that I am just missing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:10:20 PM
Kyle Kingman does not clarify anything in the following post.  If visibility prevented divers/Tim Trahan from conclusively determining the contents of the trap/cage ... why was Tim Miller put in the position of informing the family of Natalee Holloway that there was NOTHING case related in the cage/trap?

Logic dictates that Dave and Beth would have been informed that another dive would be necessary to conclusively determine if the contents of the cage/trap was related to their precious daughter.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!


Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


Janet
__________


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #284 on: March 03, 2008, 11:34:25 PM »


To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.

-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...

What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.

The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


+++++++++


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?

Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 02:19:11 PM
Kyle Kingman does not clarify anything in the following post.  If visibility prevented divers/Tim Trahan from conclusively determining the contents of the trap/cage ... why was Tim Miller put in the position of informing the family of Natalee Holloway that there was NOTHING case related in the cage/trap?

Logic dictates that Dave and Beth would have been informed that another dive would be necessary to conclusively determine if the contents of the cage/trap was related to their precious daughter.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!


Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


Janet
__________


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #284 on: March 03, 2008, 11:34:25 PM »


To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.

-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...

What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.

The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


+++++++++


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?

Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




If by 'large skate' he means 'the ALE Divers', then I guess I can believe that.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:26:21 PM
Lifesong,

Your questions are all valid in my mind.  I admire the way you think and appreciate your work on the timeline.      ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you so much 2NJ, that means a lot to me.  You're another of the wonderful, humble, unsung heroes at SM.  I'm honored.

And....

I'm feeling a bit bolstered, so I'm gonna just throw this out there and see if anyone bites....


Who is Caps?


 ::MonkeyWink::



I would really like to know too, Lifesong.  SS got really upset when the word 'weasel'  was
mentioned.  I guess that is a clue.


And, seems like I remember somebody just falling apart at the mention of Chows.  I think it was one of those two I keep getting confused...

I still maintain at least one post from Caps was either written by or contributed to by Kyle. 

JMO & only MO


Yeah and he's in his 50s.  I don't want to know for any sinister reason.  I just think
it would help to put his posts into perspective.

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992

 



What does MUI stand for?  I tried to figure it out a few days ago. ::MonkeyConfused::
I am sure it is something very obvious that I am just missing.


My hubby is not sure but ... believes that it is something related to the container/grids.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 02:30:45 PM
Tell your sainted hubby of 43 years thank you very much>


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:32:42 PM

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992

 



What does MUI stand for?  I tried to figure it out a few days ago. ::MonkeyConfused::
I am sure it is something very obvious that I am just missing.


My hubby is not sure but ... believes that it is something related to containers/grids.

Janet

If my hubby is right ... it is further confirmation that CAPS' mission on the SM forum was to create smokescreens ... smokescreens that had the ability to obscure the truth.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:33:22 PM
Tell your sainted hubby of 43 years thank you very much>

Magnolia ... he is not sure of the implication.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:34:50 PM
Kyle Kingman does not clarify anything in the following post.  If visibility prevented divers/Tim Trahan from conclusively determining the contents of the trap/cage ... why was Tim Miller put in the position of informing the family of Natalee Holloway that there was NOTHING case related in the cage/trap?

Logic dictates that Dave and Beth would have been informed that another dive would be necessary to conclusively determine if the contents of the cage/trap was related to their precious daughter.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!


Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


Janet
__________


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #284 on: March 03, 2008, 11:34:25 PM »


To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.

-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...

What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.

The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


+++++++++


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?

Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




If by 'large skate' he means 'the ALE Divers', then I guess I can believe that.



Very profound Lifesong.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 23, 2009, 02:43:05 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

http://www.fileinfo.net/extension/mui


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 02:45:19 PM
Tell your sainted hubby of 43 years thank you very much>

Magnolia ... he is not sure of the implication.

Janet

Caps uses it twice....once as MUI and once as MIU.  I thought it might mean
'men in uniform'  but it makes no sense in context.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:47:13 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

Thanks Klaas.

The definition is all Dutch to me but ... could the definition be applied to a grid as it related to the Persistence undertaking.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 02:48:00 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:51:57 PM
Tell your sainted hubby of 43 years thank you very much>

Magnolia ... he is not sure of the implication.

Janet

Caps uses it twice....once as MUI and once as MIU.  I thought it might mean
'men in uniform'  but it makes no sense in context.


The definition you came up gives me a glimpse into window of your mindset Magnolia.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

We learn a little more about each other every day without having to go to a hidey hole to research.

Love ya Mags.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 02:56:53 PM
Superior Offshore - Timeline (by Lifesong)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4578.0



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 03:02:12 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::

Name doesn't ring a bell.If that P.O.Box was used for donations it has to lead somewhere!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 23, 2009, 03:02:55 PM
Hotping - that name isn't ringing any bells with me.  Thank you for your dogged determination with this!

VERY interesting that the PO box soliciting for donations for the search was registered to a person, and not a business.

My hinky meter is seeing a red flag there!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 03:07:05 PM
Hotping - that name isn't ringing any bells with me.  Thank you for your dogged determination with this!

VERY interesting that the PO box soliciting for donations for the search was registered to a person, and not a business.

My hinky meter is seeing a red flag there!


My Hinky meter is working on overtime....I guess that's why I'm so determined to find out who it belongs too..lol....I have a whole list of possible names that are associated with this PO Box but the problem is that You don't know the timeline of when each person was associated with it.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 03:08:33 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::

Name doesn't ring a bell.If that P.O.Box was used for donations it has to lead somewhere!
Yep! I'm working on it don't give up on Me yet....keep prayin!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 03:08:48 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::

I just found an Ed who is also in the business (different company, Houston).

http://www.cheniere.com/LNG_terminals/lng_management.shtml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 03:13:40 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::

I just found an Ed who is also in the business (different company, Houston).

http://www.cheniere.com/LNG_terminals/lng_management.shtml

Ed Lehotsky This is me
Halliburton Company
5 Houston Ctr 1401 Mckinney Suite 2400
Houston, TX 77010

http://www.spoke.com/info/pDq4A94/EdLehotsky


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 03:13:45 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::

I just found an Ed who is also in the business (different company, Houston).

http://www.cheniere.com/LNG_terminals/lng_management.shtml
Thank You 2NJ! I will look and see if Connie is his daughter maybe that will lead somewhere....Ya never know!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 03:14:55 PM
I have a question.....Does anyone recognize the surmane "Lehotsky".... in relation to the Persistence/Schaefer/ Silvetti research?  I have discovered that the PO Box in Kemah was registered to an individual not a business....and since it is registered to an individual and not a business....the PO will not release the name.....but the name Connie Lehotsky Jones and Michael John Jones have this PO Box number or at least they did have....I can not say for certain whether they still have it now or if they had it back in April 2008.....I have learnt thru Galveston Appraisal records that the Joneses sold their home to Chad and Mona Vlasak back in March of 2005.....I believe that this will rule out the Vlasak's but definitely keeps the Jones' in the mix....

I'm still researching.....I just wanted to see if anyone remembered seeing the name Lehotsky in the research that has been done and posted in the timeline by Lifesong......TIA   ::MonkeyCool::

I just found an Ed who is also in the business (different company, Houston).

http://www.cheniere.com/LNG_terminals/lng_management.shtml

Ed Lehotsky This is me
Halliburton Company
5 Houston Ctr 1401 Mckinney Suite 2400
Houston, TX 77010

http://www.spoke.com/info/pDq4A94/EdLehotsky
Very Interesting....Thanks KTF!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 03:17:03 PM
I'm going too sign off for now and make some phone calls....BBL....Thanks Monkeys!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 03:22:30 PM

I got Connie Lehotsky from Ohio...


Google

Jackson-Milton High School, North jackson, Ohio (OH)Ronda Learn, 1981 - 1985. David Leatherbarrow, 1978 - 1982. Karissa Leatherbarrow, 1999 - 2003. Kyle LeBourgeois, 1997 - 2001. Connie Lehotsky, 1977 - 1981 ...
www.classmates.com/directory/school/Jackson-Milton%20High%20School_2.jsp?org=7836 - 540k - Cached - Similar pages





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 23, 2009, 04:24:51 PM
next week, on Wednesday, there is a debate in the Dutch parliament about Aruba (VNO-gate, Rudy Croes) amongst other topics concerning Aruba/Antilles.
http://www.tweedekamer.nl/vergaderingen/commissievergaderingen/per_commissie/details.jsp?parlisnummer=2009A00346&dayofweek=&his=

you could consider e-mailing members of parliament in advance.

here you could find their e-mail addresses if you click on their name and personal page.
http://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerleden/commissies/NAAZ/index.jsp

background information:

Aruba accuses the Netherlands of spying

Quote
The leaking out of a weekly report, in which the Dutch representation (VNO) in Aruba made a report of the occurrences on the island, has caused a lot of commotion in the Kingdom.  Premier Nelson Oduber talks about an ‘irreparable damage’ to the relation between both countries.  Justice-minister Rudy Croes accuses the Netherlands of spying.  “VNO can better be called the CIA of the Netherlands.”
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/05-aruba-voor_004.gif)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52415.php

Chief Public Prosecutor Hans Mos dismissed
Quote
Hans Mos resigns his position as Chief Public Prosecutor.  As a result of the statements in the leaked-out VNO-report, Justice-minister Rudy Croes has supposedly ordered him and also prosecutor Kasper van der Schaft to leave. 
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/07-aruba-voor_003.gif)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52496.php

House of Commons unsatisfied with explanation Bijleveld about Aruba leak
Quote
The political parties now want the State Secretary to finish the investigation into the leak before the 3rd of March. On that day (postponed to March 4th) there will be a General Debate in the House where the incident will be discussed. PVV-party member Hero Brinkman finds the date too late. Today he asked for an emergency debate, but except from Rita Verdonk he did not get any support. “Now that we finally have a hold on this mafia-government on Aruba, the House doesn’t want to talk about it”, states a disappointed Brinkman.
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52592.php

The Netherlands: ‘Done everything to solve the Holloway case’

Quote
The Netherlands has ‘reasonably’ done everything a country can do to solve the case of the disappeared American teenager Natalee Holloway, says state secretary Ank Bijleveld-Schouten (Kingdom Relations, CDA) in a letter to the Lower House that have asked for more information.
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52636.php


i hope this week Rudy Croes, Oduber, Mos or someone else says something stupid again.
to get some more media attention to give this debate next Wednesday more weight.

one date of interest: before March 1st Hans Mos is going decide which of the two jobs he got offered he is going to take.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 23, 2009, 04:52:30 PM
next week, on Wednesday, there is a debate in the Dutch parliament about Aruba (VNO-gate, Rudy Croes) amongst other topics concerning Aruba/Antilles.
http://www.tweedekamer.nl/vergaderingen/commissievergaderingen/per_commissie/details.jsp?parlisnummer=2009A00346&dayofweek=&his=

you could consider e-mailing members of parliament in advance.

here you could find their e-mail addresses if you click on their name and personal page.
http://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerleden/commissies/NAAZ/index.jsp

background information:

Aruba accuses the Netherlands of spying

Quote
The leaking out of a weekly report, in which the Dutch representation (VNO) in Aruba made a report of the occurrences on the island, has caused a lot of commotion in the Kingdom.  Premier Nelson Oduber talks about an ‘irreparable damage’ to the relation between both countries.  Justice-minister Rudy Croes accuses the Netherlands of spying.  “VNO can better be called the CIA of the Netherlands.”
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/05-aruba-voor_004.gif)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52415.php

Chief Public Prosecutor Hans Mos dismissed
Quote
Hans Mos resigns his position as Chief Public Prosecutor.  As a result of the statements in the leaked-out VNO-report, Justice-minister Rudy Croes has supposedly ordered him and also prosecutor Kasper van der Schaft to leave. 
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/07-aruba-voor_003.gif)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52496.php

House of Commons unsatisfied with explanation Bijleveld about Aruba leak
Quote
The political parties now want the State Secretary to finish the investigation into the leak before the 3rd of March. On that day (postponed to March 4th) there will be a General Debate in the House where the incident will be discussed. PVV-party member Hero Brinkman finds the date too late. Today he asked for an emergency debate, but except from Rita Verdonk he did not get any support. “Now that we finally have a hold on this mafia-government on Aruba, the House doesn’t want to talk about it”, states a disappointed Brinkman.
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52592.php

The Netherlands: ‘Done everything to solve the Holloway case’

Quote
The Netherlands has ‘reasonably’ done everything a country can do to solve the case of the disappeared American teenager Natalee Holloway, says state secretary Ank Bijleveld-Schouten (Kingdom Relations, CDA) in a letter to the Lower House that have asked for more information.
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52636.php


i hope this week Rudy Croes, Oduber, Mos or someone else says something stupid again.
to get some more media attention to give this debate next Wednesday more weight.

one date of interest: before March 1st Hans Mos is going decide which of the two jobs he got offered he is going to take.

Thanks for the update Caesu, i hope it makes the news too! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 23, 2009, 05:05:05 PM
Kyle Kingman does not clarify anything in the following post.  If visibility prevented divers/Tim Trahan from conclusively determining the contents of the trap/cage ... why was Tim Miller put in the position of informing the family of Natalee Holloway that there was NOTHING case related in the cage/trap?

Logic dictates that Dave and Beth would have been informed that another dive would be necessary to conclusively determine if the contents of the cage/trap was related to their precious daughter.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!


Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


Janet
__________


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #284 on: March 03, 2008, 11:34:25 PM »


To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.

-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...

What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.

The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


+++++++++


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?

Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




If by 'large skate' he means 'the ALE Divers', then I guess I can believe that.



Very profound Lifesong.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
I have always been troubled by Kyle's explanation that the "dive time was almost up". The skate stirred up the bottom at the END of the dive. What did they see BEFORE the skate stirred up the sea????? What, did they have only 1 minute of air in the tanks????????  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 05:14:55 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

Thanks Klaas.

The definition is all Dutch to me but ... could the definition be applied to a grid as it related to the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

I think I found it!! 

This was posted by Mum in Ohio the same day as Caps post using the acronym.

Netherlands Marine Corps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia31 Coy on Curaçao and 32 Coy on Aruba. These units are under direct command of the ... Marine Intervention Unit (former BBE) (a Counter-terrorism unit); ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_Marine_Corps - 41k
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 05:30:10 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

Thanks Klaas.

The definition is all Dutch to me but ... could the definition be applied to a grid as it related to the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

I think I found it!! 

This was posted by Mum in Ohio the same day as Caps post using the acronym.

Netherlands Marine Corps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia31 Coy on Curaçao and 32 Coy on Aruba. These units are under direct command of the ... Marine Intervention Unit (former BBE) (a Counter-terrorism unit); ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_Marine_Corps - 41k
 
 
 

Great find Magnolia!!!

MIU were the right initials ... not MUI.

MIU makes sense when you consider the context of CAPS' post.

My hubby showed me on his Marine locator system where the initials MUI are on the screen where he can map out/grid the different areas within a certain area of our local waters.  I think I worded that right.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

++++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 05:31:29 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

Thanks Klaas.

The definition is all Dutch to me but ... could the definition be applied to a grid as it related to the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

I think I found it!! 

This was posted by Mum in Ohio the same day as Caps post using the acronym.

Netherlands Marine Corps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia31 Coy on Curaçao and 32 Coy on Aruba. These units are under direct command of the ... Marine Intervention Unit (former BBE) (a Counter-terrorism unit); ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_Marine_Corps - 41k
 
 
 

It was in answer to this query from CapsLockWizzard:

Klaasend:

Good Morning all monkeys. This is the last question in the Shango Riddle
and I will give you a sample of what is coming...Today is the day that the floors will shake...prepare the news...

but first the question
Do anyone know the name for the Dutch Special force like the SEALS of the USA




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 05:34:28 PM
Kyle Kingman does not clarify anything in the following post.  If visibility prevented divers/Tim Trahan from conclusively determining the contents of the trap/cage ... why was Tim Miller put in the position of informing the family of Natalee Holloway that there was NOTHING case related in the cage/trap?

Logic dictates that Dave and Beth would have been informed that another dive would be necessary to conclusively determine if the contents of the cage/trap was related to their precious daughter.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!


Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


Janet
__________


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #284 on: March 03, 2008, 11:34:25 PM »


To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.

-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...

What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.

The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


+++++++++


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?

Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




If by 'large skate' he means 'the ALE Divers', then I guess I can believe that.



Very profound Lifesong.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
I have always been troubled by Kyle's explanation that the "dive time was almost up". The skate stirred up the bottom at the END of the dive. What did they see BEFORE the skate stirred up the sea????? What, did they have only 1 minute of air in the tanks????????  ::MonkeyConfused::

Even if the dive time was up ... whatever that means.  The possibility that Natalee Holloway's remains were in that cage/trap should not be ruled out.  Another dive would be were it was at.

I contend the thumbs down was a sign predetermined by the "powers that be" prior to divers even getting wet on December 30th.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 05:40:11 PM
The reason I was so interested in it was that CapsLockWizzard is saying
that Joran wasn't there.
It was the Shivas(Kalpoes) and the young MIU(young Dutch Marine).

His words were nothing but the same as Julia Renfro and put out there
for the same purpose.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 05:43:51 PM
The reason I was so interested in it was that CapsLockWizzard is saying
that Joran wasn't there.
It was the Shivas(Kalpoes) and the young MIU(young Dutch Marine).

His words were nothing but the same as Julia Renfro and put out there
for the same purpose.

I contend that CAPS reeks of the Mark Purcell/Julia Renfro/ATAHA gang.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 23, 2009, 05:46:10 PM
Hey guys (and girls),

I found a photo of Julia Renfro in her younger years,

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/vage%20forumleden/ugly_girl.jpg)

Thought you all would like to see it  ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 05:46:13 PM
The reason I was so interested in it was that CapsLockWizzard is saying
that Joran wasn't there.
It was the Shivas(Kalpoes) and the young MIU(young Dutch Marine).

His words were nothing but the same as Julia Renfro and put out there
for the same purpose.

I contend that CAPS reeks of the Mark Purcell/Julia Renfro/ATAHA gang.

Janet

I think that you contend correctly, Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 23, 2009, 05:53:54 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

Thanks Klaas.

The definition is all Dutch to me but ... could the definition be applied to a grid as it related to the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

I think I found it!! 

This was posted by Mum in Ohio the same day as Caps post using the acronym.

Netherlands Marine Corps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia31 Coy on Curaçao and 32 Coy on Aruba. These units are under direct command of the ... Marine Intervention Unit (former BBE) (a Counter-terrorism unit); ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_Marine_Corps - 41k
 
 
 

It was in answer to this query from CapsLockWizzard:

Klaasend:

Good Morning all monkeys. This is the last question in the Shango Riddle
and I will give you a sample of what is coming...Today is the day that the floors will shake...prepare the news...

but first the question
Do anyone know the name for the Dutch Special force like the SEALS of the USA




here a list special forces:

The Korps Commandotroepen (KCT) are the elite special forces of the Royal Netherlands Army. It is one of the two principal units tasked with special operations in the Netherlands (the other being the Maritime Special Operations Forces (MARSOF) of the Dutch Marine Corps), and it is deployable anywhere in the world under any circumstance, conducting all conceivable missions from the full spectrum of special operations, including counter-terrorism overseas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korps_Commandotroepen

The Unit Interventie Mariniers (Unit Intervention Marines, UIM), formerly known as the Bijzondere Bijstands Eenheid (BBE), is an elite Dutch special forces unit, which is especially trained for intervention missions. It consists of a selection of specially trained marines of the Dutch Marine Corps, and it is part of the Maritime Special Operations Forces (MARSOF), which is the maritime counterpart of the Dutch Army's Korps Commandotroepen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_Interventie_Mariniers

The 11 Luchtmobiele Brigade (Air Assault) '7 December' (11 Luchtmobiele Brigade, or 11 LMB) is the elite rapid-reaction air assault unit of the Royal Netherlands Army. Its operators are trained to be deployed via helicopters (using fast-rope and rappelling) and fixed wing aircraft (parachute), and can be deployed anywhere in the world within 7 to maximally 20 days. Combined with the helicopters of the Royal Netherlands Air Force, they form the 11 Air Manoeuvre Brigade (11 AMB).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/11_Luchtmobiele_Brigade


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 23, 2009, 05:56:11 PM
addition:

Quote
Special Forces

The Maritime Special Operations Forces (MARSOF) are the combined Special Forces units of the Marine Corps, namely the Maritime Special Operations company (MSO-CIE) and the Unit Interventie Mariniers (UIM). MSO-CIE contains the Mountain Leader and "SEALs" (frogmen) long-range reconnaissance platoons. UIM operations include domestic counter-terrorism, as well as international SF operations together with MSO-CIE (as MARSOF).

MARSOF regularly work together with the Korps Commandotroepen of the Dutch Army.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Marine_Corps#Specialisations


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 23, 2009, 05:59:12 PM
Just researching Geolab srl and happened to come across this.So weird how things pop-up with names that we've been thinking about!Keep digging Monkey's..

Marco IannirubertoProfessor at University of Brasilia

Brazil
Contact Directly
Get introduced through a connection

Current President at CDI - Comite para Democratização da Informática do DF e Entorno
Visiting Professor at University of Brasilia
Past Director at Geolab Srl  
Researcher at CRIAI
Education University of Miami
Università degli Studi di Messina
Università degli Studi di Napoli 'Parthenope'
see less...
Connections  8 connections Industry Research Websites My Company
My Company

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dir/marco/ianniruberto


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wingnut on February 23, 2009, 06:02:25 PM
Posted by Lorain at RU:

Quote
LoRain Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:16 pm   

Many pardons....but I'm not sure anyone got the question...WHY do SM's still say that Natalee was in the cage when Dave is on his way to FIND HER????

But really I just want the question asked at SM....usually folks are lined up to copy and paste elsewhere but for some strange reason....NOT this time....why is that??....
You just don't get it do you?  It's not so much we believe Natalee was in the trap, as that KYLE believed she was in the trap.  Kyle's own words point to a diversion AGAIN by the Aruban authorities and yet ANOTHER injustice to Natalee and her family.  Did KYLE tell the truth or did KYLE lie? 



Where has SM said that Natalee was in the trap?

That was Kyle who said human remains, etc.  I don't know if she was or not and the reason I don't know is that whatever was in the trap was given exclusively to ALE.

Given their history, how can anybody claim to know what they did with the trap contents?  Kyle said it was human remains and fitted a photo of Natalee over the contents of the trap.

Also, some keep forgetting that the door of the trap was forced inward and that must be taken into account in these measurements which makes them somewhat differrent.  Some always measure against a quarter of the trap when in fact it is the entire door that I believe the baggies are on top of. 

Is that a correct assumption in regards to the door or am I confused as usual?

.


In addition to KYLE stating that they were human remains, the FBI stated that they were human remains......at least, according to Kyle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 23, 2009, 06:07:55 PM
Definitions of MUI on the Web:

Multilingual User Interface (MUI) is the name of a Microsoft technology for Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Office and other applications that allows ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUI

Thanks Klaas.

The definition is all Dutch to me but ... could the definition be applied to a grid as it related to the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

I think I found it!! 

This was posted by Mum in Ohio the same day as Caps post using the acronym.

Netherlands Marine Corps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia31 Coy on Curaçao and 32 Coy on Aruba. These units are under direct command of the ... Marine Intervention Unit (former BBE) (a Counter-terrorism unit); ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_Marine_Corps - 41k
 
 
 

Thanks Magnolia!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 06:16:53 PM
I think Tim Miller went off to chase down Marco.  I don't think TIm Miller had a clue he was not welcome on the Persistence.

But I can tell you that I think the reason he would still work with Silvetti is the same reason he will still work with the Anthonys in the Caylee case.  He went to see George Anthony when he was so upset and attempted suicide.

Tim is a very unique person.  He has his flaws and so is very tolerant of them in other people.  He is almost like a man without a temper.  Never seems to get angry except at Leonard Padilla.  He always refused to say anything negative about Aruba because he knew he might have to go back and ask to search again so he would sometimes praise them when I know he could have choked the lot of them. 

I think that is just the way he is.  He will do anything to search and that's basically all he cares about.

To me he is a hero and lovable character in all of this and other cases. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 06:20:29 PM
I just had a strange thought.  Since it was Dolphi Richardson who tripled the search area, what if he did it because they wanted a map to move the big port. 

Just a thought. . . .maybe he thought he could get a free map by saying to triple the area.  Is this anywhere close to where they plan the new port to be?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 06:31:15 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/date.jpg)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.80

****************

The man's name was Marcos by any account I have read. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 06:34:48 PM
The reason I was so interested in it was that CapsLockWizzard is saying
that Joran wasn't there.
It was the Shivas(Kalpoes) and the young MIU(young Dutch Marine).

His words were nothing but the same as Julia Renfro and put out there
for the same purpose.

I contend that CAPS reeks of the Mark Purcell/Julia Renfro/ATAHA gang.

Janet

I think that you contend correctly, Janet.

When CAPS attempts to justify Beth's apparent lies to to Julia Renfro in regards to Natalee Holloway being a virgin ... he is subtlely implying that Beth is a liar.

Beth does not lie.  She is on a quest for the truth.  How will lies accomplish that.

If Beth states that Natalee was a virgin ... she believes that Natalee was a virgin.  Beth did not have an underlying motive to state what she know is not true.

Janet

++++++++

BETH LIES??


CAPS


CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »

my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749


GEROLD DOMPIG

Missing White Female
by Bryan Burrough January 2006


Despite reports to the contrary, Dompig feels certain Natalee didn't meet Joran until her final day on Aruba, Sunday. He confirms that there have been numerous reports that she may have been involved with other young men on the island. "We have taken two statements, from Julia Renfro and a Holiday Inn worker, that Beth told them she had gotten a call from her daughter, and that she was in love with a tall, blue-eyed Dutch teenager. So [Beth] had contact with her daughter. But she denies it. The question is why. If [the Twittys] don't level with us, how can they talk about a conspiracy? We need to know the truth. Joran did not have blue eyes. So who was this boy?" Beth denies making any such statements, or even having talked with Natalee while she was in Aruba.

http://www.vanityfair.com/fame/features/2006/01/natalee200601?currentPage=9



JULIA RENFRO

As missing-teen case cools, Aruba turns against family
By Carol J. Williams
Los Angeles Times


American Julia Renfro, editor-in-chief of Aruba Today, initially sided with Holloway's parents when they sought publicity and lambasted Aruban police for following Dutch investigative procedures different from those in the United States.

Galvanized by compassion for a desperate mother, Renfro stopped the presses of her daily newspaper for the first time in its history to include a picture of Holloway to aid Arubans in the islandwide search.

Renfro, a mother of four, spent weeks shuttling the family from the scene of one rumored development to another, but she became disenchanted with what she saw as Twitty's pandering to tabloid TV and "flat-out lies" she told on the air.

"I feel guilty saying any negative thing about a mother who has lost her daughter," Renfro said. "But her behavior was odd from the get-go."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003741183_aruba09.html


MARK PURCELL

Source: MIP6 on rjames.com forums October 11, 2005, 06:46 AM

I figure with my next post I should get the boot, haven’t decided which one to use yet the Beth lies or denouncing the Sainthood of Natalee. I have way too much fun watching them all freak out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Sam on February 23, 2009, 06:35:53 PM
Just here for a minute to say I continue to pray for Natalee and all of her family.

Sam


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 23, 2009, 06:39:18 PM
I think Tim Miller went off to chase down Marco.  I don't think TIm Miller had a clue he was not welcome on the Persistence.

But I can tell you that I think the reason he would still work with Silvetti is the same reason he will still work with the Anthonys in the Caylee case.  He went to see George Anthony when he was so upset and attempted suicide.

Tim is a very unique person.  He has his flaws and so is very tolerant of them in other people.  He is almost like a man without a temper.  Never seems to get angry except at Leonard Padilla.  He always refused to say anything negative about Aruba because he knew he might have to go back and ask to search again so he would sometimes praise them when I know he could have choked the lot of them. 

I think that is just the way he is.  He will do anything to search and that's basically all he cares about.

To me he is a hero and lovable character in all of this and other cases. 

Tim is solid gold!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Sam on February 23, 2009, 06:44:22 PM
I think Tim Miller went off to chase down Marco.  I don't think TIm Miller had a clue he was not welcome on the Persistence.

But I can tell you that I think the reason he would still work with Silvetti is the same reason he will still work with the Anthonys in the Caylee case.  He went to see George Anthony when he was so upset and attempted suicide.

Tim is a very unique person.  He has his flaws and so is very tolerant of them in other people.  He is almost like a man without a temper.  Never seems to get angry except at Leonard Padilla.  He always refused to say anything negative about Aruba because he knew he might have to go back and ask to search again so he would sometimes praise them when I know he could have choked the lot of them. 

I think that is just the way he is.  He will do anything to search and that's basically all he cares about.

To me he is a hero and lovable character in all of this and other cases. 

I think part of it is he feels the pain of families who have lost a loved one because he has been there and done that.

When I met Tim I told him he was a hero and gave him a hug. He said" I am no hero . I am just a small fish in a big old pond."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 06:44:40 PM
The reason I was so interested in it was that CapsLockWizzard is saying
that Joran wasn't there.
It was the Shivas(Kalpoes) and the young MIU(young Dutch Marine).

His words were nothing but the same as Julia Renfro and put out there
for the same purpose.

I contend that CAPS reeks of the Mark Purcell/Julia Renfro/ATAHA gang.

Janet

I think that you contend correctly, Janet.

When CAPS attempts to justify Beth's apparent lies to to Julia Renfro in regards to Natalee Holloway being a virgin ... he is subtlely implying that Beth is a liar.

Beth does not lie.  She is on a quest for the truth.  How will lies accomplish that.

If Beth states that Natalee was a virgin ... she believes that Natalee was a virgin.  Beth did not have an underlying motive to state what she know is not true.

Janet

++++++++

BETH LIES??


CAPS


CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »

my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749


GEROLD DOMPIG

Missing White Female
by Bryan Burrough January 2006


Despite reports to the contrary, Dompig feels certain Natalee didn't meet Joran until her final day on Aruba, Sunday. He confirms that there have been numerous reports that she may have been involved with other young men on the island. "We have taken two statements, from Julia Renfro and a Holiday Inn worker, that Beth told them she had gotten a call from her daughter, and that she was in love with a tall, blue-eyed Dutch teenager. So [Beth] had contact with her daughter. But she denies it. The question is why. If [the Twittys] don't level with us, how can they talk about a conspiracy? We need to know the truth. Joran did not have blue eyes. So who was this boy?" Beth denies making any such statements, or even having talked with Natalee while she was in Aruba.

http://www.vanityfair.com/fame/features/2006/01/natalee200601?currentPage=9



JULIA RENFRO

As missing-teen case cools, Aruba turns against family
By Carol J. Williams
Los Angeles Times


American Julia Renfro, editor-in-chief of Aruba Today, initially sided with Holloway's parents when they sought publicity and lambasted Aruban police for following Dutch investigative procedures different from those in the United States.

Galvanized by compassion for a desperate mother, Renfro stopped the presses of her daily newspaper for the first time in its history to include a picture of Holloway to aid Arubans in the islandwide search.

Renfro, a mother of four, spent weeks shuttling the family from the scene of one rumored development to another, but she became disenchanted with what she saw as Twitty's pandering to tabloid TV and "flat-out lies" she told on the air.

"I feel guilty saying any negative thing about a mother who has lost her daughter," Renfro said. "But her behavior was odd from the get-go."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003741183_aruba09.html


MARK PURCELL

Source: MIP6 on rjames.com forums October 11, 2005, 06:46 AM

I figure with my next post I should get the boot, haven’t decided which one to use yet the Beth lies or denouncing the Sainthood of Natalee. I have way too much fun watching them all freak out.


It was Trina, the taxi driver who said that she overheard the story of Natalee and the young Dutch Marine.
As it turned out. Trina's father was a taxi driver on Aruba.  Trina had never driven the taxi, but worked for
Bon Dia Newspaper.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 06:47:29 PM
I think Tim Miller went off to chase down Marco.  I don't think TIm Miller had a clue he was not welcome on the Persistence.

But I can tell you that I think the reason he would still work with Silvetti is the same reason he will still work with the Anthonys in the Caylee case.  He went to see George Anthony when he was so upset and attempted suicide.

Tim is a very unique person.  He has his flaws and so is very tolerant of them in other people.  He is almost like a man without a temper.  Never seems to get angry except at Leonard Padilla.  He always refused to say anything negative about Aruba because he knew he might have to go back and ask to search again so he would sometimes praise them when I know he could have choked the lot of them. 

I think that is just the way he is.  He will do anything to search and that's basically all he cares about.

To me he is a hero and lovable character in all of this and other cases. 

I disagree Anna.

Loyalty implies taking a position!!

I stand behind justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family.  I would consider it a betrayal to befriend ANYBODY who participants and furthers the Aruban coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing since May 30, 2005 and ... forced a famly to ride a never ending roller coaster ride from H---.

Anna ... considering Kyle Kingman's words ... would you have a professional or personal relationship with John Silvetti if the possibility exists that your loved one could have been in that cage/trap.

If it is revealed that Tim Miller is aware of the John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway and ... still chooses a continued relationship with this man ... I am done!

For now I am giving him the benefit of the doubt.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 06:49:52 PM
I was totally shocked when caps posted that accusing Beth of lying.  Like he would know!  Natalee was in Aruba only about 80 hours when she disappeared.  There was no "earlier in the week" because she was in Mountain Brook earlier in the week and yet they tell tales of what she did in Aruba.

Makes me furious.  They don't even have the most basic facts straight and yet claim to have inside information and people fell all over caps and hung on his every word.  Anyone who thought differently got the treatment.

Well, I am thankful his fan club is no longer operational.  I thought he was nuts and those who believed him about the same.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 06:53:46 PM
I was totally shocked when caps posted that accusing Beth of lying.  Like he would know!  Natalee was in Aruba only about 80 hours when she disappeared.  There was no "earlier in the week" because she was in Mountain Brook earlier in the week and yet they tell tales of what she did in Aruba.

Makes me furious.  They don't even have the most basic facts straight and yet claim to have inside information and people fell all over caps and hung on his every word.  Anyone who thought differently got the treatment.

Well, I am thankful his fan club is no longer operational.  I thought he was nuts and those who believed him about the same.

I think his fan club, as well as CapsLockWizzard, are alive and well at CnG.  SS saw fit to defend him
as recently as last week.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 06:59:04 PM
Janet, I understand fully what you are saying but I don't think Tim grasps details all that much.  He doesn't take stands and you do but you are both good, just different.

If I were missing I would want Tim looking for me.

I have read that he says he did some very strange things in his own grief for his daughter and so because of that he has this tolerance that you and I don't have.  But his mind is always on the search first.  I don't think he has a clue he was not wanted on that boat.  And he didn't have any say on the dive that happened when he was already gone looking for Marcos.

I don't think he knows about much that happened after he got off the boat.  He has been on about a dozen searches since then and found three people I can think of, at least one alive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 07:04:52 PM
I was totally shocked when caps posted that accusing Beth of lying.  Like he would know!  Natalee was in Aruba only about 80 hours when she disappeared.  There was no "earlier in the week" because she was in Mountain Brook earlier in the week and yet they tell tales of what she did in Aruba.

Makes me furious.  They don't even have the most basic facts straight and yet claim to have inside information and people fell all over caps and hung on his every word.  Anyone who thought differently got the treatment.

Well, I am thankful his fan club is no longer operational.  I thought he was nuts and those who believed him about the same.

I think his fan club, as well as CapsLockWizzard, are alive and well at CnG.  SS saw fit to defend him
as recently as last week.

Well, which one would one defend as the theory was different just about every day.  And always saying all Dave had to do was come down and claim the body but in about five or six different places.

Sometimes he could be entertaining.  The Yellowhammer = Yellow Hummer still cracks me up!  He surely wasn't from around here, was he Mags!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 07:18:58 PM
Janet, I understand fully what you are saying but I don't think Tim grasps details all that much.  He doesn't take stands and you do but you are both good, just different.

If I were missing I would want Tim looking for me.

I have read that he says he did some very strange things in his own grief for his daughter and so because of that he has this tolerance that you and I don't have.  But his mind is always on the search first.  I don't think he has a clue he was not wanted on that boat.  And he didn't have any say on the dive that happened when he was already gone looking for Marcos.

I don't think he knows about much that happened after he got off the boat.  He has been on about a dozen searches since then and found three people I can think of, at least one alive.

IF Tim Miller is aware of the deception encompassing the recovery of the contents of the cage/trap ... considering Kyle Kingman's own words ... he should be taking legal action against John Silvetti ... not forming a continued professinal relationships with him.

Think about it.  Donations to cover the costs of the Persistence undertaking were solicited by TES.  The understanding was that the Persistence had a mission on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to discovery and recovery Natalee Holloways remains so she could be brought home ... not turn them over unchallenged to the enemy.

It is Tim Millers responsibility as director of the TES organization to hold John Silvetti/ Louis Schaefer accountable.

Janet 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 07:29:49 PM
I understand what you are saying Janet.  And logic does dictate. 

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt just as you are but I also think he is not a detail person and while it might be his responsibility, etc. I don't think he is that aware of who is doing what not connected directly to the search.  If he knows ALE was given the contents of the trap, I am sure he would be upset but he would only know what he was told as he was off chasing Marcos.

He made one trip to search for three days for Jose Tromp, too.

Sometimes things fall through the cracks and people are not able to do all that they should with regard to details and have to trust that to others and move forward but I don't think he would ever be part of anything that did not return a loved one to their family.  Not knowingly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 07:47:00 PM
next week, on Wednesday, there is a debate in the Dutch parliament about Aruba (VNO-gate, Rudy Croes) amongst other topics concerning Aruba/Antilles.
http://www.tweedekamer.nl/vergaderingen/commissievergaderingen/per_commissie/details.jsp?parlisnummer=2009A00346&dayofweek=&his=

you could consider e-mailing members of parliament in advance.

here you could find their e-mail addresses if you click on their name and personal page.
http://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerleden/commissies/NAAZ/index.jsp

background information:

Aruba accuses the Netherlands of spying

Quote
The leaking out of a weekly report, in which the Dutch representation (VNO) in Aruba made a report of the occurrences on the island, has caused a lot of commotion in the Kingdom.  Premier Nelson Oduber talks about an ‘irreparable damage’ to the relation between both countries.  Justice-minister Rudy Croes accuses the Netherlands of spying.  “VNO can better be called the CIA of the Netherlands.”
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/05-aruba-voor_004.gif)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52415.php

Chief Public Prosecutor Hans Mos dismissed
Quote
Hans Mos resigns his position as Chief Public Prosecutor.  As a result of the statements in the leaked-out VNO-report, Justice-minister Rudy Croes has supposedly ordered him and also prosecutor Kasper van der Schaft to leave. 
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/07-aruba-voor_003.gif)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52496.php

House of Commons unsatisfied with explanation Bijleveld about Aruba leak
Quote
The political parties now want the State Secretary to finish the investigation into the leak before the 3rd of March. On that day (postponed to March 4th) there will be a General Debate in the House where the incident will be discussed. PVV-party member Hero Brinkman finds the date too late. Today he asked for an emergency debate, but except from Rita Verdonk he did not get any support. “Now that we finally have a hold on this mafia-government on Aruba, the House doesn’t want to talk about it”, states a disappointed Brinkman.
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52592.php

The Netherlands: ‘Done everything to solve the Holloway case’

Quote
The Netherlands has ‘reasonably’ done everything a country can do to solve the case of the disappeared American teenager Natalee Holloway, says state secretary Ank Bijleveld-Schouten (Kingdom Relations, CDA) in a letter to the Lower House that have asked for more information.
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52636.php


i hope this week Rudy Croes, Oduber, Mos or someone else says something stupid again.
to get some more media attention to give this debate next Wednesday more weight.

one date of interest: before March 1st Hans Mos is going decide which of the two jobs he got offered he is going to take.



Klaas, there is something missing from that photo of Mos.  Hint:  It matches his tie.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 07:50:32 PM
I understand what you are saying Janet.  And logic does dictate. 

I am giving him the benefit of the doubt just as you are but I also think he is not a detail person and while it might be his responsibility, etc. I don't think he is that aware of who is doing what not connected directly to the search.  If he knows ALE was given the contents of the trap, I am sure he would be upset but he would only know what he was told as he was off chasing Marcos.

He made one trip to search for three days for Jose Tromp, too.

Sometimes things fall through the cracks and people are not able to do all that they should with regard to details and have to trust that to others and move forward but I don't think he would ever be part of anything that did not return a loved one to their family.  Not knowingly.

At the very least ... Tim Miller has a choice not to have a continued professional relationship with a person who defrauded TES donors and ... betrayed Natalee Holloway and her family.  At the very most Tim Miller as director of TES should be holding John Silvetti legally accountable.

Anna ... this is the reason that so many are skeptical about donating to causes.  There is no accountability by the organization doing the soliciting.

My $200.00 donations to TES helped abet John Silvetti's participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.  My expectation was that the discovery and recovery of Natalee Holloways remains by the Persistence would contribute to bringing an American citizen home to her family ... to her country.

Donors to TES should be able to expect Tim Miller as director of TES to be a good steward.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 08:01:25 PM
Janet, I am hoping TES did not give any money to them.  Kept theirs separate.  And I am confident that Tim would use any donations correctly. 

They seemed to have all bases covered.  Tim sent off after Marcos and Caps to take care of the nosey forum.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 23, 2009, 08:09:30 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 23, 2009, 08:33:01 PM
Geert Wilders is on BOR right now on the east coast, he's the Dutch politician caesu has posted so much about recently...........just an FYI


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 23, 2009, 08:34:01 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?

Wreck - not that I know of YET


Not my best work  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/MosPurse2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 23, 2009, 08:36:50 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?

Wreck - not that I know of YET


Not my best work  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/MosPurse2.jpg)

Well, its a nice shoulder bag.  Not our fault if Hans doesn't know how to wear it.

Accessories make the outfit!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 23, 2009, 08:37:42 PM
Anna and Klaas  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 10:11:00 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?

Wreck - not that I know of YET


Not my best work  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/MosPurse2.jpg)

Hi Monkeys!   ::MonkeyDance::

Klaas, your work was good enough to give me a much needed laugh!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Taking some classes for work this week, and realizing more than ever that "there's no place like home"!   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'll be catching up, just wanted to say Hi to everyone.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 10:11:17 PM
 ::MonkeyLaugh::  How many times will Moss drop the 'red bag'?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 23, 2009, 10:16:31 PM
Geert Wilders is on BOR right now on the east coast, he's the Dutch politician caesu has posted so much about recently...........just an FYI

BOR did talk over him all the time, but he was also at the Glenn Beck show:
http://www.foxnews.com/video/index.html?playerId=videolandingpage&streamingFormat=FLASH&referralObject=3718114&referralPlaylistId=playlist
Quote
WASHINGTON (AP) - Republican Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona is hosting a film screening at the Capitol for a Dutch lawmaker who claims that Islam inspires terrorism.

Kyl is sponsoring the Thursday event for Geert Wilders, who was denied entry to London earlier this month because British officials said he posed a threat to public order.

Wilders' 15-minute film juxtaposes verses from the Quran with images of violence by Muslims. Wilders has called the Quran a "fascist book" and said it should be banned.

Kyl's spokesman says the senator is hosting the event because "all too often, people who have the courage to point out the dangers of militant Islamists find themselves vilified and endangered."
http://www.kget.com/news/political/story/GOP-senator-hosting-anti-Islamic-Dutch-lawmaker/LpETqTy6-0SXRN66PbY5NA.cspx


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 10:18:26 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?

Wreck - not that I know of YET


Not my best work  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/MosPurse2.jpg)

Hi Monkeys!   ::MonkeyDance::

Klaas, your work was good enough to give me a much needed laugh!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Taking some classes for work this week, and realizing more than ever that "there's no place like home"!   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'll be catching up, just wanted to say Hi to everyone.



Good to see you TM.  I have been wondering where you were. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on February 23, 2009, 10:21:57 PM
Well, his handbag DOES match his tie. There is something to be said for that, I suppose!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 10:39:16 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?

Wreck - not that I know of YET


Not my best work  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/MosPurse2.jpg)

Hi Monkeys!   ::MonkeyDance::

Klaas, your work was good enough to give me a much needed laugh!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Taking some classes for work this week, and realizing more than ever that "there's no place like home"!   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'll be catching up, just wanted to say Hi to everyone.



Good to see you TM.  I have been wondering where you were. ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks Magnolia, good to see you too!   ::MonkeyCool::

I've missed being here, always wondering what I'm missing!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 10:45:23 PM
Has there been ANY confirmation of the return trip to Aruba?

Wreck - not that I know of YET


Not my best work  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub6_022109/MosPurse2.jpg)

Hi Monkeys!   ::MonkeyDance::

Klaas, your work was good enough to give me a much needed laugh!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Taking some classes for work this week, and realizing more than ever that "there's no place like home"!   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'll be catching up, just wanted to say Hi to everyone.



Good to see you TM.  I have been wondering where you were. ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks Magnolia, good to see you too!   ::MonkeyCool::

I've missed being here, always wondering what I'm missing!   ::MonkeyWink::
Hi TM......There is definitely "NO Place Like Home".... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 10:47:09 PM
Hi Hotping, I LOVE your determination on researching that P.O. Box!   ::MonkeyCool::

Way to go girl!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::

Keep up the good work!   ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: always 1 on February 23, 2009, 10:57:21 PM
Hello, I just popped in to say hi to Janet, but I see she's not here.  And I wanted to show her the tatto CBB gave me (it doesn't make me bad) .  You know I read here every day and I appreciate you all.  Keep on keeping on!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 10:58:39 PM
Hi Monkeys

It sure is a slow night on the Natalee Holloway forum.

I hope you all had a good day. 

A game of 500 Rummy is where it is at.
 
GOOD NIGHT ALL

Janet
8:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:01:06 PM
Hello, I just popped in to say hi to Janet, but I see she's not here.  And I wanted to show her the tatto CBB gave me (it doesn't make me bad) .  You know I read here every day and I appreciate you all.  Keep on keeping on!!!!

I am here A1.

The tattoo.  Well ... I am not sure.  I keep trying to wip what looks like a little mark on my screen covering your cheek.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Good Night A1.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 11:02:14 PM
Hi Monkeys

It sure is a slow night on the Natalee Holloway forum.

I hope you all had a good day. 

A game of 500 Rummy is where it is at.
 
GOOD NIGHT ALL

Janet
8:00 PM

Even the Frog hasn't been here.   I am wondering if Obama has appointed Kermit to
his cabinet. ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:03:55 PM
Hi Monkeys

It sure is a slow night on the Natalee Holloway forum.

I hope you all had a good day. 

A game of 500 Rummy is where it is at.
 
GOOD NIGHT ALL

Janet
8:00 PM

Even the Frog hasn't been here.   I am wondering if Obama has appointed Kermit to
his cabinet. ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Kermit and I do not agree on politics.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 11:05:26 PM
Hi Monkeys

It sure is a slow night on the Natalee Holloway forum.

I hope you all had a good day. 

A game of 500 Rummy is where it is at.
 
GOOD NIGHT ALL

Janet
8:00 PM


Goodnight Janet, I love rummy!  Hope you win!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:07:08 PM
Hi Monkeys

It sure is a slow night on the Natalee Holloway forum.

I hope you all had a good day. 

A game of 500 Rummy is where it is at.
 
GOOD NIGHT ALL

Janet
8:00 PM


Goodnight Janet, I love rummy!  Hope you win!   ::MonkeyCool::

So do I.  The stakes are high.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 11:12:17 PM
When it's quiet here, we tend to get off topic.  To be fair to KeeptheFaith & billb, I will have to say, this is where it's at, Justice for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 11:14:01 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 11:15:41 PM
Hi Hotping, I LOVE your determination on researching that P.O. Box!   ::MonkeyCool::

Way to go girl!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::

Keep up the good work!   ::MonkeyDance::



I agree, and love to help, even if it's a smidgeon....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 11:17:49 PM
Hi Hotping, I LOVE your determination on researching that P.O. Box!   ::MonkeyCool::

Way to go girl!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::

Keep up the good work!   ::MonkeyDance::


Thanks TM....Its Doable to find out who it belongs to it just takes time....I have been working on it off and on....I'll get there soon...I hope! You All know how it is when You have other obligations along with the cage and Justice for Natalee.....  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 11:18:43 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!

Keep up the good work everyone!     

Whatever it takes, we need to find Justice for Natalee and her family.

Goodnight!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 11:20:02 PM
Hi Monkeys

It sure is a slow night on the Natalee Holloway forum.

I hope you all had a good day. 

A game of 500 Rummy is where it is at.
 
GOOD NIGHT ALL

Janet
8:00 PM

Even the Frog hasn't been here.   I am wondering if Obama has appointed Kermit to
his cabinet. ::MonkeyShocked::
Magnolia I 've been wondering about the Frog too! I've got a feeling We will get a vist soon!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 23, 2009, 11:20:45 PM
Hi Hotping, I LOVE your determination on researching that P.O. Box!   ::MonkeyCool::

Way to go girl!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::

Keep up the good work!   ::MonkeyDance::


Thanks TM....Its Doable to find out who it belongs to it just takes time....I have been working on it off and on....I'll get there soon...I hope! You All know how it is when You have other obligations along with the cage and Justice for Natalee.....  ::MonkeyWink::

Yes, I do know how it is Hotping; and it makes me appreciate your diligence that much more!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 11:20:55 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!

Keep up the good work everyone!     

Whatever it takes, we need to find Justice for Natalee and her family.

Goodnight!   ::MonkeyCool::
Good Night TM!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 11:22:41 PM
Hi Hotping, I LOVE your determination on researching that P.O. Box!   ::MonkeyCool::

Way to go girl!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::

Keep up the good work!   ::MonkeyDance::


Thanks TM....Its Doable to find out who it belongs to it just takes time....I have been working on it off and on....I'll get there soon...I hope! You All know how it is when You have other obligations along with the cage and Justice for Natalee.....  ::MonkeyWink::

Yes, I do know how it is Hotping; and it makes me appreciate your diligence that much more!

 ::MonkeyCool::
Well Thank You Once Again! "Blushing Monkey Here" lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:23:24 PM
Texasmom ... it has been almost four years.  Sometimes ... I get so discouraged.

I do not believe that justice is going to come from a Dutch/Aruban court but ... if the Persistence deception can be exposed ... maybe Natalee Holloway's family could be afforded a measure of closure.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.


'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 23, 2009, 11:26:06 PM
hotping, wreck, Lifesong and BUCKSHOT

Good Night

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 11:30:21 PM
Goodnight, Janet.  Have a good night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 11:37:24 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 11:38:15 PM
hotping, wreck, Lifesong and BUCKSHOT

Good Night

Janet

Good Night, Janet.  God Bless.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 23, 2009, 11:39:08 PM
hotping, wreck, Lifesong and BUCKSHOT

Good Night

Janet
Good Night Janet!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 23, 2009, 11:43:42 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

My memory is telling me it was filmed in the fall of 2007 or sometime before the year's end.  I am not certain, though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 23, 2009, 11:49:02 PM
Lifesong - I thought it might have been Joran's confession to Patrick.

I thought that might be it too, Klaas.  The timing is right.


So.What i would like to know in chronological order of the Joran/Patrick confession tape,who was informed and at what time?We could put that into Lifesongs timeline!


KTF - I was thinking the same thing & will add all of those dates.  I'm cleaning up links/sourcing and adding photos right now... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 11:53:37 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

 I am not positive but I remember it being said that they were in the middle of filming the Range Rover
tapes and Mos had Joran and the Kalpoes rearrested.  That was the 29th or 30th of Nov, 2007.

That was one reason that Joran couldn't be jailed after the Range Rover confession aired


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 23, 2009, 11:57:33 PM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

 I am not positive but I remember it being said that they were in the middle of filming the Range Rover
tapes and Mos had Joran and the Kalpoes rearrested.  That was the 29th or 30th of Nov, 2007.

That was one reason that Joran couldn't be jailed after the Range Rover confession aired


I will add that it had 'leaked' that someone in NL had been secretly recording Joran.
I think it was Lazlo at RU that leaked that.
I think Mos had a card up his sleeve when he had the three rearrested.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 12:34:37 AM
                                JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

                                   GOODNIGHT AND GOD BLESS

                                            KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 12:48:06 AM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

 I am not positive but I remember it being said that they were in the middle of filming the Range Rover
tapes and Mos had Joran and the Kalpoes rearrested.  That was the 29th or 30th of Nov, 2007.

That was one reason that Joran couldn't be jailed after the Range Rover confession aired


I will add that it had 'leaked' that someone in NL had been secretly recording Joran.
I think it was Lazlo at RU that leaked that.
I think Mos had a card up his sleeve when he had the three rearrested.

Absolutely - that was a Hinky deal for sure!  I want to see that down on paper too and see how it lines up.

As I've been working tonight I got to thinking that probably Tim Trahan is the worst diver you could ever want to hire for anything.  He had a pretty important job on December 30th and it sounds like he completely choked.  The official story is he was out of dive time (which I'm assuming has to do with air supply/rate of ascent) and couldn't see anything because the sediment was disturbed. 

That's just incredibly unreliable.  He was a Project Manager according to Kyle's blog.  But, evidently he just disappeared for the rest of the search, leaving the poor search crew with no divers at all and unable to do anything about only having ALE divers. 

If Tim Trahan is that unreliable when counted on in a critical situation and on a critical project, then I can't imagine he could be recommended for other diving assignments for paying customers.

 ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 01:39:14 AM
Kermit

WHAT WAS JOHN SILVETTI REALLY AFTER?

jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world. The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after.  It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found herI don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg625934#msg625934

Kyle:After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains


I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil[/u]...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.
Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer  


Kyle said: June 29, 2008: I'm curious if the birds connects the dots and figures out what John will do before he knows what he's doing. Well, he's a pretty shrewd businessman and usually thinks at least three steps ahead. We'll see how this plays out. I'll be at his house in about 5-6 hours."


KEEPTHEFAITH

Soliciting MONEY almost a month after you've left the waters of ARUBA???Where is the MONEY????

Hmmmm.

I thought Tim Miller contacted Schaefer who called Dave Holloway and recruited Silvetti. 

But this is Lala's telling the Leak that according to Jug, Silvetti offered to look for Natalee and then brought in Schaefer?  Is that right?

I think that could matter, I just don't know if its true.


Quote
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

From here to Aruba

BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST

An expedition to search the waters off Aruba for the remains of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway leaves today from the Port of Iberia.

The research vessel Persistence, owned by the Lafayette-based Silvetti Group, will make the 10-day journey to the island. A 20- to 25-man crew will spend at least two weeks surveying the sea floor for Holloway, who has been missing since May 30, 2005.

Holloway, 18, was last seen leaving a bar with three men hours before she was scheduled to fly home with high school classmates celebrating their graduation.

Last week, police re-arrested the three men, prompting her father to re-launch the search in deep waters.


John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years.

Schaefer asked Silvetti if he could provide the survey personnel and the geophysical equipment required for the search. After spending a weekend with Schaefer and Pam and Dave Holloway, Silvetti agreed.
 

“It ripped my heart out to hear them say that right now all they’re looking for is to have a funeral in Alabama,” Silvetti said. “What do you say to someone like that?”

Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

Marc Broussard, project manager for the Silvetti Group, said the company normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters. Now, it will be using its high-resolution SONAR equipment to look for a body.

To upgrade its systems for the terrain in Aruba, Broussard said the Silvetti Group looked to its vendors, two of which are based in New Iberia.

Seatronics, located at the Port of Iberia, agreed to donate some of its high-tech electronic equipment to scan the ocean floor.

“I told (Silvetti) any opportunity that we had to go in on such a good cause, we would go in on it,” said Erik McGuire, vice president of Seatronics Inc.

“We’re more than happy to give the best effort possible to recover this girl for her family.”

Pro Log Inc. also stepped forth to provide a command center building where all of the surveying equipment will be stored. Like many people around the country, Pro Log Human Resources Director Heidi Parker said she has been following Holloway’s disappearance closely.

“We’re a family-owned business, so family is very important to us,” Parker said. “Anything we can do to help this family out is something that we’re going to do.”

After more than two years of searching, Texas Equusearch office manager Cheryl Lawless said she is hoping the organization’s fifth trip to Aruba will be its last. She said the venture would not be possible without the help of Schaefer, Silvetti and the other local companies.

“Nothing is being done to gain name recognition. This is to help these people,” Silvetti said. “Most of us have watched this on television, and I can only imagine the horror any parent would go through searching for their child in a foreign country.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: AZLady on February 24, 2009, 05:08:58 AM
WHAT WAS JOHN SILVETTI REALLY AFTER?

John Silvetti was contacted by Louis Schaeffer. 
Louis Schaeffer was contacted by TES.

Did TES approach Schaeffer for a donation?  Plausible as they most likely contact all big money who regularly give to to charities. 

Did Schaeffer view TES as a tool he might use to make a survey of the Aruban waters to discover a way to set up offshore drilling and save his floundering company?
Did Schaeffer contact Silvetti to obtain the equipment and expertise for his search without having to pay for it?  After all, Schaeffer was trying to fund a very expensive, last ditch effort.

It seems apparent what Schaeffer was after.  But what did John Silvetti want?  I speculate he was after money, too, but not in the form of oil.  Silvetti seems very intent on motivating others to raise funds for him.  Beth, Dave, the head of the Hotel Assoc. on Aruba...  Silvetti's company "normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters."  Is this like treasure hunting?  Is Silvetti a modern-day treasure hunter?  a scavenger?  a looter? 

I'm just rambling... pay me no mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: AZLady on February 24, 2009, 07:25:26 AM
After reading more, I'm starting to wonder if Silvetti is interested in ocean floor mining.  Apparently, there are minerals beneath the ocean floor that are valuable if they can be mined.  Most of what I found was out of Australia.  Just an idea...


Wealth beneath the waves at
http://www.sciencewa.net.au/index.phpItemid=587&id=2195&option=com_content&task=view
Exploring the social dimensions of the Australian seafloor exploration and mining industry
at http://www.csiro.au/science/SEM.html
Map Sheds Light on Ocean Floor at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/08/060811080640.htm
Diamond miner discovers undersea wealth at http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/05/2208785.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: AZLady on February 24, 2009, 07:39:25 AM
Here's another article:
Billions Buried on the Seafloor at http://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/gold-underwater-mining/302

I don't know if this might be behind the mapping of the waters around Aruba or not.  Most of the minerals now mined are in the Pacific or around Australia, near volcanic faults.  This would not seem to apply to the Caribbean.  Interesting idea, though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: AZLady on February 24, 2009, 07:51:18 AM
Okay, one more idea, then I'll be quiet.  What if the mapping of the waters around Aruba was done to facilitate the building of a pipeline?  Perhaps a neighboring country has some oil wells and they need to lay a pipeline to transport this oil to..oh, maybe a refinery or somewhere.  I think there may be some profit in this for the country, for Aruba, and for the mappers and pipeline builders.  Just an idea.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 09:11:52 AM
It is so good to see you AZ Lady.  Been missing you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 24, 2009, 09:36:32 AM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

 I am not positive but I remember it being said that they were in the middle of filming the Range Rover
tapes and Mos had Joran and the Kalpoes rearrested.  That was the 29th or 30th of Nov, 2007.

That was one reason that Joran couldn't be jailed after the Range Rover confession aired


They have manipulated their legal system in a calculated, and not coincidental, manner.
Suspect status vs. Witness status, etc...
Arresting J2K with insufficient evidence so that when real evidence comes, the bar will have been set too high to re-arrest.
There must be lots of dogs and ponies in Aruba. It has been a show that has lasted nearly four years.

They would not even have had to expose their underbelly. Arrest the perpetrators. Joran, a minor, could have been psychologically evaluated as perpared by JanVDS, served minimal jail time and the Kalpoes could have been staged to be peripherally involved only with the same - minimal jail time. Morally, and respectfully, they could have returned NH's deceased body to her home country and state, paid for a funeral and burial service. Worst case scenario for them is that they would have had to compensate them with some money for wrongful death while in Aruba, if it even got to that point.

Aruba has probably spent 25:1 dollar for dollar to do the wrong thing, as opposed to doing the right thing. 25 is probably a conservatively low number. It will continue to grow. There is not turning back for them now. It will not be pretty for them if and when things ever hit the fan. Pressure, in some form, will always be on them. They have brought unwarranted international attention to themselves.  Like the old saying goes, They made their bed, now they will have to lie in it. They may be lying in it for a long time, with unpredicted negative consequences to their island and economy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 24, 2009, 09:38:54 AM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

 I am not positive but I remember it being said that they were in the middle of filming the Range Rover
tapes and Mos had Joran and the Kalpoes rearrested.  That was the 29th or 30th of Nov, 2007.

That was one reason that Joran couldn't be jailed after the Range Rover confession aired


They have manipulated their legal system in a calculated, and not coincidental, manner.
Suspect status vs. Witness status, etc...
Arresting J2K with insufficient evidence so that when real evidence comes, the bar will have been set too high to re-arrest.
There must be lots of dogs and ponies in Aruba. It has been a show that has lasted nearly four years.

They would not even have had to expose their underbelly. Arrest the perpetrators. Joran, a minor, could have been psychologically evaluated as perpared by JanVDS, served minimal jail time and the Kalpoes could have been staged to be peripherally involved only with the same - minimal jail time. Morally, and respectfully, they could have returned NH's deceased body to her home country and state, paid for a funeral and burial service. Worst case scenario for them is that they would have had to compensate them with some money for wrongful death while in Aruba, if it even got to that point.

Aruba has probably spent 25:1 dollar for dollar to do the wrong thing, as opposed to doing the right thing. 25 is probably a conservatively low number. It will continue to grow. There is not turning back for them now. It will not be pretty for them if and when things ever hit the fan. Pressure, in some form, will always be on them. They have brought unnecessary international attention to themselves.  Like the old saying goes, They made their bed, now they will have to lie in it. They may be lying in it for a long time, with unpredicted negative consequences to their island and economy.

correction. it is certainly warranted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 10:10:36 AM
WHAT WAS JOHN SILVETTI REALLY AFTER?

John Silvetti was contacted by Louis Schaeffer. 
Louis Schaeffer was contacted by TES.

Did TES approach Schaeffer for a donation?  Plausible as they most likely contact all big money who regularly give to to charities. 

Did Schaeffer view TES as a tool he might use to make a survey of the Aruban waters to discover a way to set up offshore drilling and save his floundering company?
Did Schaeffer contact Silvetti to obtain the equipment and expertise for his search without having to pay for it?  After all, Schaeffer was trying to fund a very expensive, last ditch effort.

It seems apparent what Schaeffer was after.  But what did John Silvetti want?  I speculate he was after money, too, but not in the form of oil.  Silvetti seems very intent on motivating others to raise funds for him.  Beth, Dave, the head of the Hotel Assoc. on Aruba...  Silvetti's company "normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters."  Is this like treasure hunting?  Is Silvetti a modern-day treasure hunter?  a scavenger?  a looter? 

I'm just rambling... pay me no mind.

Hi AZLady.  I don't know the answers, but I have seen "shipwrecks" a few times...


Quote
http://www.thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=054bac688bc7c40c

Captain Elliott’s sells fishing operations

By Hunter Sauls
The Facts   

Published January 4, 2008

FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.

Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.

<snip>

Schaefer is not stopping there. He has also purchased the Bed and Breakfast next door to the docks, and the purchase of a new “expedition” ship is in the works, said Underwater Expeditions operations manager Jamie Stovall.

“If we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it right,” Stovall said. “We’re really excited about this acquisition.”

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

“We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.


These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

<snip>

12/2007:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285
Kyle Kingman:  Here's my personal feeling on the whole thing:
Personally, I much prefer searching for lost shipwrecks.  They are much bigger and typically don't have living enemies.

01/2008:  http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xiv-search-area.html
John Silvetti:  65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar.

02/2008:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg357890;topicseen#msg357890
Kyle Kingman:  The only mention by us about finding anything other than shipwrecks was buried in one posting on our blog where we said samples were recovered and sent for analysis.

03/2008:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360294#msg360294
Private Eye:  What I want to know Ocean Ex is did you see any sunken treasures?
Kyle Kingman:  Well, if I sent the sunken treasure information to the FBI it would be posted somewhere on the Internet already lol.


So, of those 65 ROV dives - how many were on shipwrecks?  http://nholloway.blogspot.com/






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 10:18:13 AM
10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)


BUMP

BUMP
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anyone have handy the date when Range Rover confession was actually taped?  I know that the Peter R. DeVries show aired on 2/03/08... 

 I am not positive but I remember it being said that they were in the middle of filming the Range Rover
tapes and Mos had Joran and the Kalpoes rearrested.  That was the 29th or 30th of Nov, 2007.

That was one reason that Joran couldn't be jailed after the Range Rover confession aired


I will add that it had 'leaked' that someone in NL had been secretly recording Joran.
I think it was Lazlo at RU that leaked that.
I think Mos had a card up his sleeve when he had the three rearrested.

Lazlo posted on Nov 29, 2007 at RU

No one from the OM has claimed the new evidence was Joran talking to Kalpoes, but Joran talking to a friend. IMO

I don't know if Joran and Kalpoes's phones were tapped prior to their detention. 


This was before the Range Rover confession became public knowledge.
J2K had been rearrested on Nov 23.  Joran in NL; Kalpoes in Aruba due to new evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: muisje on February 24, 2009, 10:27:31 AM
The interviews in the Range Rover were created after the release of Joran, in December 2007 and / or January 2008.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: muisje on February 24, 2009, 10:32:44 AM
The intention was to do it earlier, but after the arrest of Joran it was only possible after the release of Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 10:33:50 AM

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992


Janet,

Here are two examples I had of Caps early posts that were, to me, just disgusting and appalling.  Each for different reasons, as I'm sure you'll understand.


1.  01/22/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg331197#msg331197
Ok Summary:

They were 12 but 2 got arrested and 10 more to go form this party hosted by #5, At the party they where repeating what she did a week ago with this casino boy. (making a film). everyone in the casino has seen it. The taxi drivers role (2K) was to bring her to this party. This party was at the casablanca. at the party gate the taxi driver (2k) where no allowed in. there was a heated discussion and they left waiting outside. Joran was inside.

Yes it is him.

Read the clues.

The other riddle was rewritten and scambled and the authors given other names to confuse the readers.



2.  01/25/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg332051#msg332051

CAPSLOCKWIZARD SAYS:

HAVE SHAKEN THE WIRE, DIRTYHANDS CONSORT TO TOURIST HEAD, DIRTYHANDS IN POWERS HARBOUR.

CODES ARE SAVE, MOVING IN VERY DANGER ZONES.

DO NOT SEND POSSE, POSSE DO NOT HAVE POWERS ON INDIANS, SEND IN THE POSSE WITH POWERS TO RECOVER MARY.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 10:35:28 AM
The interviews in the Range Rover were created after the release of Joran, in December 2007 and / or January 2008.

It appears you are correct.  I just checked the thread started on Patrick's book and there are references to specific dates in January, 2008.  Thank you.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2981.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: muisje on February 24, 2009, 10:45:59 AM
The interviews in the Range Rover were created after the release of Joran, in December 2007 and / or January 2008.

It appears you are correct.  I just checked the thread started on Patrick's book and there are references to specific dates in January, 2008.  Thank you.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2981.0

Indeed, from the book by Patrick van der Eem, called "Overboard"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:46:33 AM

<snipped>


Quote
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

From here to Aruba

BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST

An expedition to search the waters off Aruba for the remains of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway leaves today from the Port of Iberia.

The research vessel Persistence, owned by the Lafayette-based Silvetti Group, will make the 10-day journey to the island. A 20- to 25-man crew will spend at least two weeks surveying the sea floor for Holloway, who has been missing since May 30, 2005.

Holloway, 18, was last seen leaving a bar with three men hours before she was scheduled to fly home with high school classmates celebrating their graduation.

Last week, police re-arrested the three men, prompting her father to re-launch the search in deep waters.

John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years.

Schaefer asked Silvetti if he could provide the survey personnel and the geophysical equipment required for the search. After spending a weekend with Schaefer and Pam and Dave Holloway, Silvetti agreed.

“It ripped my heart out to hear them say that right now all they’re looking for is to have a funeral in Alabama,” Silvetti said. “What do you say to someone like that?”  

Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

Marc Broussard, project manager for the Silvetti Group, said the company normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters. Now, it will be using its high-resolution SONAR equipment to look for a body.

To upgrade its systems for the terrain in Aruba, Broussard said the Silvetti Group looked to its vendors, two of which are based in New Iberia.

Seatronics, located at the Port of Iberia, agreed to donate some of its high-tech electronic equipment to scan the ocean floor.

“I told (Silvetti) any opportunity that we had to go in on such a good cause, we would go in on it,” said Erik McGuire, vice president of Seatronics Inc.

“We’re more than happy to give the best effort possible to recover this girl for her family.”

Pro Log Inc. also stepped forth to provide a command center building where all of the surveying equipment will be stored. Like many people around the country, Pro Log Human Resources Director Heidi Parker said she has been following Holloway’s disappearance closely.

“We’re a family-owned business, so family is very important to us,” Parker said. “Anything we can do to help this family out is something that we’re going to do.”

After more than two years of searching, Texas Equusearch office manager Cheryl Lawless said she is hoping the organization’s fifth trip to Aruba will be its last. She said the venture would not be possible without the help of Schaefer, Silvetti and the other local companies.

“Nothing is being done to gain name recognition. This is to help these people,” Silvetti said. “Most of us have watched this on television, and I can only imagine the horror any parent would go through searching for their child in a foreign country.”


BETRAYAL!!!


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

John Silvetti

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
 
Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me.

Kyle: Mr. Red Shirt came on the Persistence along with Dolf, Mos, et al for the meeting on the 30th."

Kyle:   This is certainly NOT John Silvetti. I do not know this man. He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 11:02:22 AM

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992


Janet,

Here are two examples I had of Caps early posts that were, to me, just disgusting and appalling.  Each for different reasons, as I'm sure you'll understand.


1.  01/22/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg331197#msg331197
Ok Summary:

They were 12 but 2 got arrested and 10 more to go form this party hosted by #5, At the party they where repeating what she did a week ago with this casino boy. (making a film). everyone in the casino has seen it. The taxi drivers role (2K) was to bring her to this party. This party was at the casablanca. at the party gate the taxi driver (2k) where no allowed in. there was a heated discussion and they left waiting outside. Joran was inside.

Yes it is him.

Read the clues.

The other riddle was rewritten and scambled and the authors given other names to confuse the readers.



2.  01/25/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg332051#msg332051

CAPSLOCKWIZARD SAYS:

HAVE SHAKEN THE WIRE, DIRTYHANDS CONSORT TO TOURIST HEAD, DIRTYHANDS IN POWERS HARBOUR.

CODES ARE SAVE, MOVING IN VERY DANGER ZONES.

DO NOT SEND POSSE, POSSE DO NOT HAVE POWERS ON INDIANS, SEND IN THE POSSE WITH POWERS TO RECOVER MARY.



Thank you Lifesong

I truly cannot comprehend CAPS following no matter how hard I try ... a following that upholds him no matter which direction away from the truth he leads.  I considered him deception personified from the first post I read that was submitted by him.

::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 11:03:51 AM


Thanks for the dates/info on the Range Rover confessions, everyone.

I've got some other business to take care of over the next couple of days, but will be checking in on the thread regularly and working on the timeline, I do want to get the sourcing cleared up before I go back to adding more information.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 11:07:35 AM


Thanks for the dates/info on the Range Rover confessions, everyone.

I've got some other business to take care of over the next couple of days, but will be checking in on the thread regularly and working on the timeline, I do want to get the sourcing cleared up before I go back to adding more information.




 ::MonkeyWaa::

I will miss ya.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 11:08:38 AM
This might get confusing, but I'll try and post it as clearly as I can.

I don't know if this confession Kyle was referring to actually ever happened, and the info was passed along to the Persistence by one of the "good guys" within ALE - or if it was one of the corrupt folk within ALE who told them, and it was all a sham.

Anyway - TWO confessions are being discussed in the following.

Kyle had told us there was a confession that influenced (to a degree) their search:

kyle wrote:

Here's a shocker: the confession from one of the former suspects I was refering to was NOT Joran. Also, the timing was long before the DeVries Land Rover taping began.

This is second hand, but someone came forward during the search anonymously claiming via a hotline that one of the former suspects (not Joran) told him that the body was disposed at sea. From what I recall, they said they took the body out as far as they could. No names or elaborations were given.
------------------

here Kyle is discussing the Joran confession, and how Richardson played it out for all it was worth to get Persistence to remain in deep waters (I am removing his personal opinions of Mos and Richardson):

kyle wrote (discussing Mos and Richardson - and referring to Joran's confessions to Patrick):

The evidence for this is conflicting views and statements about the same question and actions towards us. Example: when we asked them both about the confession tapes giving any insight towards our search, Mos said it didn't add anything. Richardson said absolutely, you must keep searching WHERE you are. (we were 10 miles offshore - WAY out in deep water).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 11:52:09 AM


Thanks for the dates/info on the Range Rover confessions, everyone.

I've got some other business to take care of over the next couple of days, but will be checking in on the thread regularly and working on the timeline, I do want to get the sourcing cleared up before I go back to adding more information.




 ::MonkeyWaa::

I will miss ya.

Janet


Thanks, Janet.   ::MonkeyWink::

I have to admit, I'm not looking forward to it...


Jen - Thank you for that.
  Without giving us Kyle's statements, would you be comfortable giving just your impressions of his opinions of Mos and Richardson?  I think that might be interesting background having never met either one.  Either way, still grateful here!






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 11:53:26 AM
This might get confusing, but I'll try and post it as clearly as I can.

I don't know if this confession Kyle was referring to actually ever happened, and the info was passed along to the Persistence by one of the "good guys" within ALE - or if it was one of the corrupt folk within ALE who told them, and it was all a sham.

Anyway - TWO confessions are being discussed in the following.

Kyle had told us there was a confession that influenced (to a degree) their search:

kyle wrote:

Here's a shocker: the confession from one of the former suspects I was refering to was NOT Joran. Also, the timing was long before the DeVries Land Rover taping began.

This is second hand, but someone came forward during the search anonymously claiming via a hotline that one of the former suspects (not Joran) told him that the body was disposed at sea. From what I recall, they said they took the body out as far as they could. No names or elaborations were given.
------------------

here Kyle is discussing the Joran confession, and how Richardson played it out for all it was worth to get Persistence to remain in deep waters (I am removing his personal opinions of Mos and Richardson):

kyle wrote (discussing Mos and Richardson - and referring to Joran's confessions to Patrick):

The evidence for this is conflicting views and statements about the same question and actions towards us. Example: when we asked them both about the confession tapes giving any insight towards our search, Mos said it didn't add anything. Richardson said absolutely, you must keep searching WHERE you are. (we were 10 miles offshore - WAY out in deep water).


Why is there so much interaction between the crew of the Persistence and the "powers that be" in regards to the search effort to locate Natalee Holloway's remains.  Logic dictates that the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since May 30, 2005 and put a family through a H--- on Earth were on a mission to thwart any attempt to reveal the truth ... the truth that could implicate Joran or Paulus van der Sloot.

If there was no independent plan which did not embrace the illusion that the enemy would be of assistance prior to the Persistence undertaking ... if there was no independent plan in regards to the discovery and recovery of Natalee Holloway's remains ... a negative outcome from the Persistence undertaking was a given.

Dave Holloway and Tim Miller knew the dynamics encompassing the coverup ... the corrupt investigation.  Dave wrote a book ... CORRUPTION IN PARADISE.  Considering justice for Natalee and bringing her home to rest on American soil has motivated these two men from the getgo ... I do not get it!

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 11:59:22 AM
Good Morning All

Janet
9:00 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 12:00:01 PM


Thanks for the dates/info on the Range Rover confessions, everyone.

I've got some other business to take care of over the next couple of days, but will be checking in on the thread regularly and working on the timeline, I do want to get the sourcing cleared up before I go back to adding more information.




 ::MonkeyWaa::

I will miss ya.

Janet


Thanks, Janet.   ::MonkeyWink::

I have to admit, I'm not looking forward to it...


Jen - Thank you for that.
  Without giving us Kyle's statements, would you be comfortable giving just your impressions of his opinions of Mos and Richardson?  I think that might be interesting background having never met either one.  Either way, still grateful here!






YW!!

Mmmmmm.................I can say that I get the impression Kyle's opinions mirror those of many here regarding Mos and Richardson.  To varying degrees.

Is that at all helpful?  ::MonkeyWaa::  I'm sorry - I would never want to put words in someone's mouth, so this is kind of hard for me.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 12:08:26 PM
 :scratch: :smt073   :smt102

This is where I am at the moment.  Jen, I think you did lose me with the 2 separate confessions, and then it snowballed from there.     ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 12:10:47 PM


Thanks for the dates/info on the Range Rover confessions, everyone.

I've got some other business to take care of over the next couple of days, but will be checking in on the thread regularly and working on the timeline, I do want to get the sourcing cleared up before I go back to adding more information.



 ::MonkeyWaa::

I will miss ya.

Janet


Thanks, Janet.   ::MonkeyWink::

I have to admit, I'm not looking forward to it...


Jen - Thank you for that.
  Without giving us Kyle's statements, would you be comfortable giving just your impressions of his opinions of Mos and Richardson?  I think that might be interesting background having never met either one.  Either way, still grateful here!


YW!!

Mmmmmm.................I can say that I get the impression Kyle's opinions mirror those of many here regarding Mos and Richardson.  To varying degrees.

Is that at all helpful?  ::MonkeyWaa::  I'm sorry - I would never want to put words in someone's mouth, so this is kind of hard for me.  ::MonkeyConfused::

No worries, Jen!  That will help. 

I do get it, you guys have been put in an impossible position. 

Ok, Monkeys - will you guys posts your own opinions of Mos and Richardson, not necessarily only as it relates to Jen's post, but what's different about your opinion of Mos vs. your opinion of Richardson.  Mos says one thing and Richardson says the other...so...





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 12:17:47 PM
:scratch: :smt073   :smt102

This is where I am at the moment.  Jen, I think you did lose me with the 2 separate confessions, and then it snowballed from there.     ::MonkeyConfused::

Sorry - that wasn't clear as mud for you?  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Let me try again............

Supposedly there were TWO 'confessions' of sorts. 

One by Joran to Patrick that we all saw.

And one by a "former suspect" who is NOT Joran. 
This former suspect told someone that Natalee had been disposed of at sea - and that someone called it in to a hotline anonymously.

That happened during the beginnings of the Persistence's search (or at least it was reported to Persistence crew in the beginnings of their search).

Joran's confession to Patrick came later - and the ONLY impact it had on the search, was Richardson telling Persistence to look in "deep water" for her - saying the confession from Joran supports it.  (which it didn't, as we all know after seeing it). 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 12:20:06 PM

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992


Janet,

Here are two examples I had of Caps early posts that were, to me, just disgusting and appalling.  Each for different reasons, as I'm sure you'll understand.


1.  01/22/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg331197#msg331197
Ok Summary:

They were 12 but 2 got arrested and 10 more to go form this party hosted by #5, At the party they where repeating what she did a week ago with this casino boy. (making a film). everyone in the casino has seen it. The taxi drivers role (2K) was to bring her to this party. This party was at the casablanca. at the party gate the taxi driver (2k) where no allowed in. there was a heated discussion and they left waiting outside. Joran was inside.

Yes it is him.

Read the clues.

The other riddle was rewritten and scambled and the authors given other names to confuse the readers.



2.  01/25/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg332051#msg332051

CAPSLOCKWIZARD SAYS:

HAVE SHAKEN THE WIRE, DIRTYHANDS CONSORT TO TOURIST HEAD, DIRTYHANDS IN POWERS HARBOUR.

CODES ARE SAVE, MOVING IN VERY DANGER ZONES.

DO NOT SEND POSSE, POSSE DO NOT HAVE POWERS ON INDIANS, SEND IN THE POSSE WITH POWERS TO RECOVER MARY.




Natalee was not in Aruba earlier in the week.  There was no casino boy.  She was in Mt Brook and their plane arrived Thursday afternoon.

Why anyone would promote such is just beyond me.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 12:22:40 PM
:scratch: :smt073   :smt102

This is where I am at the moment.  Jen, I think you did lose me with the 2 separate confessions, and then it snowballed from there.     ::MonkeyConfused::

Sorry - that wasn't clear as mud for you?  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Let me try again............

Supposedly there were TWO 'confessions' of sorts. 

One by Joran to Patrick that we all saw.

And one by a "former suspect" who is NOT Joran. 
This former suspect told someone that Natalee had been disposed of at sea - and that someone called it in to a hotline anonymously.

That happened during the beginnings of the Persistence's search (or at least it was reported to Persistence crew in the beginnings of their search).

Joran's confession to Patrick came later - and the ONLY impact it had on the search, was Richardson telling Persistence to look in "deep water" for her - saying the confession from Joran supports it.  (which it didn't, as we all know after seeing it). 

OK...I get it, now.  The way I read your first post, I was thinking both were prior to Joran's confession to Patrick. 

It certainly doesn't help that the taped Rover conversations & the Persistence search were happening around the same time, either. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 12:35:11 PM
Lifesong,

If you were asking for our opinion of Mos & Richardson, I would have to say that I do not trust either one, but that is because of all that we've seen happen and not happen over the past almost 4 years. 

That said, having had a chief and detective in the family, I know that there are power struggles at times when departments have to work with the prosecutor's office.  Each takes pride in their work, and I'm certain ego comes into play, as well.   It should be a coordinated effort. 

In Aruba, with the judicial system we can't possibly understand,  my take is the prosecutor's office called the shots.  Right there is a setting that might undermine the self-proclaimed talents of the chief and his underlings, which might produce statements contradicting the stance of prosecutor.   jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 12:36:52 PM

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992


Janet,

Here are two examples I had of Caps early posts that were, to me, just disgusting and appalling.  Each for different reasons, as I'm sure you'll understand.


1.  01/22/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg331197#msg331197
Ok Summary:

They were 12 but 2 got arrested and 10 more to go form this party hosted by #5, At the party they where repeating what she did a week ago with this casino boy. (making a film). everyone in the casino has seen it. The taxi drivers role (2K) was to bring her to this party. This party was at the casablanca. at the party gate the taxi driver (2k) where no allowed in. there was a heated discussion and they left waiting outside. Joran was inside.

Yes it is him.

Read the clues.

The other riddle was rewritten and scambled and the authors given other names to confuse the readers.



2.  01/25/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg332051#msg332051

CAPSLOCKWIZARD SAYS:

HAVE SHAKEN THE WIRE, DIRTYHANDS CONSORT TO TOURIST HEAD, DIRTYHANDS IN POWERS HARBOUR.

CODES ARE SAVE, MOVING IN VERY DANGER ZONES.

DO NOT SEND POSSE, POSSE DO NOT HAVE POWERS ON INDIANS, SEND IN THE POSSE WITH POWERS TO RECOVER MARY.




Natalee was not in Aruba earlier in the week.  There was no casino boy.  She was in Mt Brook and their plane arrived Thursday afternoon.

Why anyone would promote such is just beyond me.



ANSWER:  Trolls who have been placed on Natalee Holloway forums by the Aruban "powers that be" to create smokescreens that will obscure the truth.  I contend that CAPS is a troll.

What I cannot comprehend is Monkeys who have upheld the family in their contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevail ... are adhering to CAPS  every word.  CAPS' theories change and ... his adherence follow each new theory with anticipation.  His flawed research is justified.  Beth Holloway is called a liar and ... no one  challenge the great leader.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 12:53:22 PM

ANSWER:  Trolls who have been placed on Natalee Holloway forums by the Aruban "powers that be" to create smokescreens that will obscure the truth.  I contend that CAPS is a troll.

What I cannot comprehend is Monkeys who have upheld the family in their contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevail ... are adhering to CAPS  every word.  CAPS' theories change and ... his adherence follow each new theory with anticipation.  His flawed research is justified.  Beth Holloway is called a liar and ... no one  challenge the great leader.

Janet

And no one was to challenge this as he was only here to "help" but I fail to see how any assistance was brought to anything by all this nonsense.

And that pond was thoroughly searched by a private company looking for Jose Tromp.  If anything were found that could be Natalee related, would they have just tossed that aside and said not Jose?  I don't think so.

JMO that they didn't find anything and this is why we stopped getting all the reports on that activity.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 01:01:01 PM
You'd think if people were going to lie, they could at least keep the timeframe straight.

I think it was OSpainter who did the actual count of time including sleep time for the MT Brook trip and they were on the island something like 83 hours before Natalee vanished.

She took no meals outside the group according to what the group told her parents.

Beth is the one I uphold in Natalee's stead.

I know of no lies she had told.  She only repeated what the Happy Islanders told her and what she believed to be the truth. 

And not even Julia and certainly not Jossy attended any party where Natalee was killed.  They are bad but not that bad.  Few people are. 

And the belief some have that if they can find a certain clue, the whole thing will unravel, it just will not happen.  This house of cards has many foundations with different interest supporting each of them.  Tourism is one, people actually implicated who don't want that know is another, Sloot protectionism is another.  Now we have to wonder about ocean exploration as yet another one.

I am just rambling and going no where in particular with this. . . feeling kind of useless these days as I can't do the corporate research some can.  I just can't follow it, too dense or whatever.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 01:10:44 PM

I contend that it is impossible to put CAPS posts into any logical perspective other than his attempt to distract from the contents of the cage/trap which is indicated in one of his first posts on the forum.  The words of his first posts to the Natalee Holloway discussion attempts to diverts attention away from the ocean in regards to the disposal of Natalee Holloway's body ... away from the Marriott beach ... setting the stage for the pond witness.

CAPS articulates in perfect English in some posts while others appear to be writting by someone who does not grasp the English language.  His theories keep changing.  His research is flawed or he purposely provides misinformation.  CAPS Deceptively attempts to portray ignorance in regards to who Natalee Holloway's family members are.
Janet

++++++

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #394 on: January 27, 2008, 03:27:58 PM »


No no

The question is like this

Joran said that they drop the body near the Mariotte are, fishermans hut. but it is not the body that was drop. something else was drop.  Joran self was not there, it was the young MIU and the Shivas that went over there but not to build sand casle.

The KALOES (SURINAM) MOBS must have drop someting over there so that The MIU can recovert it and with the f16 send to holland.

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332992#msg332992


Janet,

Here are two examples I had of Caps early posts that were, to me, just disgusting and appalling.  Each for different reasons, as I'm sure you'll understand.


1.  01/22/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg331197#msg331197
Ok Summary:

They were 12 but 2 got arrested and 10 more to go form this party hosted by #5, At the party they where repeating what she did a week ago with this casino boy. (making a film). everyone in the casino has seen it. The taxi drivers role (2K) was to bring her to this party. This party was at the casablanca. at the party gate the taxi driver (2k) where no allowed in. there was a heated discussion and they left waiting outside. Joran was inside.

Yes it is him.

Read the clues.

The other riddle was rewritten and scambled and the authors given other names to confuse the readers.



2.  01/25/08:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg332051#msg332051

CAPSLOCKWIZARD SAYS:

HAVE SHAKEN THE WIRE, DIRTYHANDS CONSORT TO TOURIST HEAD, DIRTYHANDS IN POWERS HARBOUR.

CODES ARE SAVE, MOVING IN VERY DANGER ZONES.

DO NOT SEND POSSE, POSSE DO NOT HAVE POWERS ON INDIANS, SEND IN THE POSSE WITH POWERS TO RECOVER MARY.




Natalee was not in Aruba earlier in the week.  There was no casino boy.  She was in Mt Brook and their plane arrived Thursday afternoon.

Why anyone would promote such is just beyond me.



ANSWER:  Trolls who have been placed on Natalee Holloway forums by the Aruban "powers that be" to create smokescreens that will obscure the truth.  I contend that CAPS is a troll.

What I cannot comprehend is Monkeys who have upheld the family in their contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevail ... are adhering to CAPS  every word.  CAPS' theories change and ... his adherence follow each new theory with anticipation.  His flawed research is justified.  Beth Holloway is called a liar and ... no one  challenge the great leader.

Janet

TROLLS! ::MonkeyDance:: LOGIC DICTATES JANET.In regards to the Persistence,as well as the cage/trap and it's contents.I believe some who believe it may be a diversion either work for,or are related to the crew!In my opinion i've seen a concerted effort to minimize,disregard, as well as rationalize kyle's word's and the photos of the contents without ANY reasoning!PERIOD..I think we've all asked as to WHY we should disregard Kyle's words and the events surrounding the cage and trap.I'm still waiting for something other then Kyle is a scammer,prankster,photoshopper!We get nothing.Wonder why?? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 01:31:44 PM


NJ SONS MOM - you are better than myself, I would have described the legal system in Aruba as hubris or an abomination, or both.

I think what has been difficult about this case from the get-go, was that due to the internet and the realtime information highway, the path became twisted as the powers that be on Aruba and in Holland moved to deflect and begin to cover up. We have righteous indignation that Natalee's justice has not been served, yet the level at which the decision to solve or not to solve this case was very far above LE or Judicial's head. This is pure political play, I think at times it's why it's so hard to swallow.

I also stated gently when I first learned of the Persistence's involvement in the search, that I didn't believe it was for totally altruistic reasons then, and certainly not now. As much as we would like to believe companies and corporations donate heavily for causes, we need to remember that's rarer than hen's teeth. It's almost always what's in it for them. I've had to ask over the years for signifciant corporate level donations, have that t-shirt but I haven't been asking for millions of dollars in donations, but I have secured ranges from 25K to 250K. (national banks, national retailers, etc)







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 01:39:04 PM


TROLLS! ::MonkeyDance:: LOGIC DICTATES JANET.In regards to the Persistence,as well as the cage/trap and it's contents.I believe some who believe it may be a diversion either work for,or are related to the crew!In my opinion i've seen a concerted effort to minimize,disregard, as well as rationalize kyle's word's and the photos of the contents without ANY reasoning!PERIOD..I think we've all asked as to WHY we should disregard Kyle's words and the events surrounding the cage and trap.I'm still waiting for something other then Kyle is a scammer,prankster,photoshopper!We get nothing.Wonder why?? ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

It boggles my mind.

Some want it both ways.  They will not undermine Kyle Kingman's words because they know those words reveal the truth but ... for some reason ... they uphold John Silvetti.

It is all about protecting John Silvetti and ... protecting John Silvetti implies that the messenger (Kermit) ... the Natalee's Freebirds' former administrator (Jen) ... the roboposter (Tamikosmom) and others ... must be discredited/intimidated in an attempt to silence.

In other words ... Kyle Kingman's words which implicate John Silvetti in the finale to the great Aruban coverup must be allowed to fade away ... to disappear.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 01:40:32 PM
And I would even be OK with duel purposes had not donations been solicited. 

But I will never be OK with the contents of that trap which Kyle assured us repeated were human remains being turned over exclusively to ALE, the enemy of justice in this investigation.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 01:44:27 PM
Some seem concerned that young Kyle will get into trouble with his employer because of the things he said about him.

That is unforunate.  But the cause of justice for Natalee is why we are here.  It is not the fault of others what Kyle posted.  He has only himself to blame for that.

And he knew from the leaked photos Robin posted in yet another hidey hole that nothing stays private in the net.

So what are we supposed to do?  Forego what may have been in the trap in order to protect the career of Kyle?  That is asking too much.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 01:50:12 PM
And I would even be OK with duel purposes had not donations been solicited. 

But I will never be OK with the contents of that trap which Kyle assured us repeated were human remains being turned over exclusively to ALE, the enemy of justice in this investigation.



Agreed, the asking of private donations targeting these forums on the web was the nail in the coffin of the lack of integrity. In light of the funds required, it could have only been a drop in the bucket to boot?

Any human remains discovered should have been open for scrutiny but then, this is Aruba.....


Janet-

They don't discredit you. Slings and arrows........and Caps has had every opportunity to reach out to responsible individuals who would protect his identity in this case in the US. He/she never did, very telling

IMO





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 01:50:14 PM


NJ SONS MOM - you are better than myself, I would have described the legal system in Aruba as hubris or an abomination, or both.

I think what has been difficult about this case from the get-go, was that due to the internet and the realtime information highway, the path became twisted as the powers that be on Aruba and in Holland moved to deflect and begin to cover up. We have righteous indignation that Natalee's justice has not been served, yet the level at which the decision to solve or not to solve this case was very far above LE or Judicial's head. This is pure political play, I think at times it's why it's so hard to swallow.

I also stated gently when I first learned of the Persistence's involvement in the search, that I didn't believe it was for totally altruistic reasons then, and certainly not now. As much as we would like to believe companies and corporations donate heavily for causes, we need to remember that's rarer than hen's teeth. It's almost always what's in it for them. I've had to ask over the years for signifciant corporate level donations, have that t-shirt but I haven't been asking for millions of dollars in donations, but I have secured ranges from 25K to 250K. (national banks, national retailers, etc)







Around about the same time Kyle told us that he was interested to see if Freebirds could guess Silvetti's next move - he also stated that "At the end of the day, John is a business man."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 01:50:56 PM


TROLLS! ::MonkeyDance:: LOGIC DICTATES JANET.In regards to the Persistence,as well as the cage/trap and it's contents.I believe some who believe it may be a diversion either work for,or are related to the crew!In my opinion i've seen a concerted effort to minimize,disregard, as well as rationalize kyle's word's and the photos of the contents without ANY reasoning!PERIOD..I think we've all asked as to WHY we should disregard Kyle's words and the events surrounding the cage and trap.I'm still waiting for something other then Kyle is a scammer,prankster,photoshopper!We get nothing.Wonder why?? ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

It boggles my mind.

Some want it both ways.  They will not undermine Kyle Kingman's words because they know those words reveal the truth but ... for some reason ... they uphold John Silvetti.

It is all about protecting John Silvetti and ... protecting John Silvetti implies that the messenger (Kermit) ... the Natalee's Freebirds' former administrator (Jen) ... the roboposter (Tamikosmom) and others ... must be discredited/intimidated in an attempt to silence.

In other words ... Kyle Kingman's words which implicate John Silvetti in the finale to the great Aruban coverup must be allowed to fade away ... to disappear.

Janet



ALL LOYALTY'S SHOULD REST AT THE FEET OF TRUTH AND JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY!

WHERE EVER THAT TAKES US!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 01:53:33 PM
Some seem concerned that young Kyle will get into trouble with his employer because of the things he said about him.

That is unforunate.  But the cause of justice for Natalee is why we are here.  It is not the fault of others what Kyle posted.  He has only himself to blame for that.

And he knew from the leaked photos Robin posted in yet another hidey hole that nothing stays private in the net.

So what are we supposed to do?  Forego what may have been in the trap in order to protect the career of Kyle?  That is asking too much.



Precisely Anna!!

Natalee's Freebirds had congregated for one reason, and one reason only = Justice and answers for Natalee and her family.

Kyle knew that going in....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 01:54:39 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 01:56:00 PM


TROLLS! ::MonkeyDance:: LOGIC DICTATES JANET.In regards to the Persistence,as well as the cage/trap and it's contents.I believe some who believe it may be a diversion either work for,or are related to the crew!In my opinion i've seen a concerted effort to minimize,disregard, as well as rationalize kyle's word's and the photos of the contents without ANY reasoning!PERIOD..I think we've all asked as to WHY we should disregard Kyle's words and the events surrounding the cage and trap.I'm still waiting for something other then Kyle is a scammer,prankster,photoshopper!We get nothing.Wonder why?? ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

It boggles my mind.

Some want it both ways.  They will not undermine Kyle Kingman's words because they know those words reveal the truth but ... for some reason ... they uphold John Silvetti.

It is all about protecting John Silvetti and ... protecting John Silvetti implies that the messenger (Kermit) ... the Natalee's Freebirds' former administrator (Jen) ... the roboposter (Tamikosmom) and others ... must be discredited/intimidated in an attempt to silence.

In other words ... Kyle Kingman's words which implicate John Silvetti in the finale to the great Aruban coverup must be allowed to fade away ... to disappear.
Janet



You and I know each other's hearts well enough to understand - neither of us would ever let that happen.

And neither would anyone/everyone here who just wants to see justice done - and hopefully Natalee returned to her family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 01:57:56 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


It's laugable.Can you see the court's witness list? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 01:59:46 PM
Well, I also saw with interest the twisting once again of what was posted at that website and this time in regards to Cub Scouts, even.

No one here bashed any Cub Scouts!

What we did find objectionable to was the using of them as a shield by certain attacker as a reason not to answer questions or actually read responses.

It was this person who was abusing the cub scout angle for their own protection and not monkeys.

Typical of the twist and warped interpretation of things actually posted by those with reading comprehension problems.  And a really lowdown thing to do.  Almost as bad as telling Jug the monkeys said the family had the remains and concealed that fact.

Some people can only feel better about themselves by trying to make others look bad.  It seldom works on thinking people.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 02:00:03 PM


NJ SONS MOM - you are better than myself, I would have described the legal system in Aruba as hubris or an abomination, or both.

I think what has been difficult about this case from the get-go, was that due to the internet and the realtime information highway, the path became twisted as the powers that be on Aruba and in Holland moved to deflect and begin to cover up. We have righteous indignation that Natalee's justice has not been served, yet the level at which the decision to solve or not to solve this case was very far above LE or Judicial's head. This is pure political play, I think at times it's why it's so hard to swallow.

I also stated gently when I first learned of the Persistence's involvement in the search, that I didn't believe it was for totally altruistic reasons then, and certainly not now. As much as we would like to believe companies and corporations donate heavily for causes, we need to remember that's rarer than hen's teeth. It's almost always what's in it for them. I've had to ask over the years for signifciant corporate level donations, have that t-shirt but I haven't been asking for millions of dollars in donations, but I have secured ranges from 25K to 250K. (national banks, national retailers, etc)







Around about the same time Kyle told us that he was interested to see if Freebirds could guess Silvetti's next move - he also stated that "At the end of the day, John is a business man."

Indeed Jen, indeed. He is predictable.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 02:01:35 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 02:03:09 PM


TROLLS! ::MonkeyDance:: LOGIC DICTATES JANET.In regards to the Persistence,as well as the cage/trap and it's contents.I believe some who believe it may be a diversion either work for,or are related to the crew!In my opinion i've seen a concerted effort to minimize,disregard, as well as rationalize kyle's word's and the photos of the contents without ANY reasoning!PERIOD..I think we've all asked as to WHY we should disregard Kyle's words and the events surrounding the cage and trap.I'm still waiting for something other then Kyle is a scammer,prankster,photoshopper!We get nothing.Wonder why?? ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

It boggles my mind.

Some want it both ways.  They will not undermine Kyle Kingman's words because they know those words reveal the truth but ... for some reason ... they uphold John Silvetti.

It is all about protecting John Silvetti and ... protecting John Silvetti implies that the messenger (Kermit) ... the Natalee's Freebirds' former administrator (Jen) ... the roboposter (Tamikosmom) and others ... must be discredited/intimidated in an attempt to silence.

In other words ... Kyle Kingman's words which implicate John Silvetti in the finale to the great Aruban coverup must be allowed to fade away ... to disappear.

Janet



ALL LOYALTY'S SHOULD REST AT THE FEET OF TRUTH AND JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY!

WHERE EVER THAT TAKES US!

EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_____


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap.  That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.


'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER
:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 02:05:17 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Another lawsuit in the making.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:05:47 PM
Keepthefaith, jen3560, Magnolia, vms, nonesuche, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, Anna, natalfan, johan555, Lifesong


As the Frog said.Follow the patterns!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 02:06:39 PM
Janet  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: I have a visual of you with your duckie and Magnolia with her hat taking the oath in court.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 02:07:20 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 02:08:01 PM
Keepthefaith, jen3560, Magnolia, vms, nonesuche, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, Anna, natalfan, johan555, Lifesong


As the Frog said.Follow the patterns!

They come in packs.....and I am not referring to Cub Scouts. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:08:06 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Another lawsuit in the making.

Janet

You ladies are to kind! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 02:08:50 PM
Silvetti must be planning to sue Kyle then because Kyle is the only one who has claimed any inside information about all of this.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:09:44 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.


They chose Kyle over Beth Holloway?INSANITY at it's best!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 02:10:47 PM
Janet  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: I have a visual of you with your duckie and Magnolia with her hat taking the oath in court.



Won't we be sooooo cute?  It will be in the Southern District Court.  Janet and Ducky will have to fly in. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 02:10:55 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Another lawsuit in the making.

Janet

You ladies are to kind! ::MonkeyCool::


 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::  My sentiments exactly, ktf!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 02:11:53 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.


They chose Kyle over Beth Holloway?INSANITY at it's best!  ::MonkeyCool::

But even more insane is to do the same for Caps!  I don't think there has been even one poster from Aruba who did not have the Aruban agenda first and foremost.  Sorry, just the way I see it.  Jossy may be the best of the lot but the others are not even close.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 02:12:14 PM
Janet  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: I have a visual of you with your duckie and Magnolia with her hat taking the oath in court.



Won't we be sooooo cute?  It will be in the Southern District Court.  Janet and Ducky will have to fly in. ::MonkeyTongue::

Yes you would, quite precious in fact  ::MonkeyWink::

I'll run the cake walk to raise monies for your legal fund too  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: vms on February 24, 2009, 02:12:31 PM
Equusearch seems to have no problems working with the Silvetti Group.



Search for Missing Kayaker - Dr. Stephen Zella, in Seabrook, TX - TES needs searchers
Posted on 22. Feb, 2009 by B Tarr in Active Cases, Featured Articles, Missing Persons

02/23/09- Monday, Feb 23, 2009 - 6:30pm  The search for Dr Zella will continue tomorrow morning at Clear Lake Park.  We are still in need of boats, kayaks, jet skis and waverunners, in addition to people to act as observers on the boats.  All volunteers should report to the Command Center at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway at 8:00 am.

At this time, five boats have been deployed into Clear Lake using side scan sonar and other advanced technology to locate Stephen. Many of the boats and the dive teams will continue to work throughout the night.  At this point, Dr Zella has not yet been found, but our hopes are not dimmed that he will be found soon.  Our prayers, our thoughts, and our continued commitment remain with Dr Zella and his loving family and friends.

02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 4:15pm We have been asked to post the following message from the children of Dr. Stephen Zella:

We need volunteers to help in the fight to find my daddy. I love him so much.   If you can help the volunteers with a boat or kayak, please help them.
We have not stopped the search.
Lovingly,
Remington Zella, age 11 and Maxwell Zella, age 8


02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 1:45pm update: Multiple volunteers with boats and kayaks have shown up today to assist in the search for Stephen Zella. The kayaks are able to get into areas where the larger boats are unable to search, ensuring that we are able to do a thorough search of the area. Although high winds are making the search more difficult today, conditions have not stopped the volunteers in their effort to find Stephen. The search is still ongoing.

We continue to receive calls of concern and care from friends, neighbors,classmates and associates of Stephen and his family. The support shown by the community and friends has been outstanding, and we wish to extend our deepest thanks. Please, continue to keep Stephen and his family in your thoughts and prayers.

02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 Texas EquuSearch is in need of boats, kayaks, jet skis and wave runners to assist in today’s search for Dr. Zella, along with people to act as observers in the boats.  The Command Center is still located at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.

Last night, sonar equipment and divers worked late into the night in their efforts to find Dr. Zella. Our efforts will continue today with sonar teams scouring the bay area, Clear Lake and inlet streams.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 10:15 pm, Texas EquuSearch has been joined in the search for Dr. Zella by the Silvetti Group and Legacy Offshore Divers & Construction Company, both out of Louisiana. We will continue searching tonight, as long as possible.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 7:45pm,  Dr. Stephen Zella has not been located.  Texas EquuSearch will resume the search on Monday at 8:00am. We are asking for volunteers with shallow water boats, kayaks and jet-skis, along with foot searchers. The Command Center will remain at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway.  Search Coordinator Frank Black can be reached at 713-301-6813.

Although we have not yet found Dr. Zella, our hopes remain high that our search will be successful. We would like to extend our deepest thanks to the surrounding community, citizens and businesses alike, for their outstanding support and to local law enforcement for their tireless efforts and cooperation.

Please, continue to keep Dr. Zella and his loving family, friends and associates in your hearts and in your prayers.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 11:45 am, CST, multiple volunteers with Texas EquuSearch are on the scene searching for Dr. Stephen Zella.  Member Ted Miller is on scene with his personal helicopter to provide search assistance, along with multiple boats, other watercraft and foot searchers.  At this time, we have not yet found Dr. Zella, but we remain hopeful that today’s search will be successful.  We continue to keep the family in our prayers.

02/21/09 -Saturday evening update - Members of Texas EquuSearch spent the day searching for a missing kayaker on Clear Lake Saturday.  The missing man has been identified as well loved Dr. Stephen Zella, a 38 year old resident of the Clear Lake area.  Although we have not yet found Stephen, we plan on resuming a full-scale search on Sunday and our hopes are high that we will locate him and return him to his loving family.

Searchers are needed to assist in the search.  We are in need of searchers with jet-skis, kayaks and shallow water boats, in addition to foot searchers.  If you are able to assist, please come to the Command Center, located at the boat launch in Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.   The search will resume at 8:00 am.  The Search Coordinator is Frank Black, who can be reached at 713-301-6813.  Please see the link below for a map to the Command Center.

We ask that you continue to hold Stephen Zella, his loving family and friends close to your heart and in your prayers during this most difficult of times.

02/21/09 - Saturday, Feb. 21, 2009 - Texas EquuSearch is searching for a kayaker missing in Clear Lake Park this morning.  TES responded to a call for assistance from the Harris County Constable to assist in the search.  We are in dire need of shallow water boats, jet skis and foot searchers.  If you are able to assist, please report to the Command Center at Clear Lake Park, located at 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.  The Search Coordinator is Frank Black, and he can be reached at 713-301-6813.

http://texasequusearch.org/2009/02/search-for-missing-kayaker-in-seabrook-tx-tes-needs-searchers/


********************


Search team hopes they are close to finding missing kayaker

Bay Area Citizen
By DANA GUTHRIE
Updated: 02.24.09
Even more boats and volunteers arrived at Clear Lake Park in Seabrook Tuesday morning to aid in the search for Dr. Stephen Zella, who disappeared from his kayak on Friday near the NASA Parkway bridge.

"I think we're close, I really do," said Frank Black, search coordinator for Equusearch, which has been on the scene since Saturday. "I hope we'll have something positive today."

On Monday, a note was posted on the Equusearch website from Zella's children, 11-year-old daughter Remington and 8-year-old son Maxwell.


"We need volunteers to help in the fight to find my daddy. I love him so much.   If you can help the volunteers with a boat or kayak, please help them. We have not stopped the search."


The community response during the search for Zella has been “phenomenal,” Black said Monday afternoon at about 4 p.m.

“We’re determined to find him now."

Most of the day Monday, high winds stirred up the waters near the Clear Lake Park boat ramp, where Zella, 38, disappeared early Friday afternoon, leaving only his kayak, fishing equipment and bait behind.

Friends and family members from across the country are paying close attention to the search for the Nassau Bay psychiatrist, who worked for The Watershed, a drug and alcohol counseling group in Webster, until it shut down about a month ago.

On Monday, five different groups were using sonar equipment to scan the bottom of Clear Lake — League City, Nassau Bay, the Montgomery County Constable’s office and The Silvetti Group and Legacy Offshore Divers & Construction Co., both of Louisiana, Black said. Equusearch said the sonar teams and divers will work through most of Monday night.

“The winds have not let up on us to allow us to do anything much until now,” Black said Monday afternoon.

The search will continue on Tuesday beginning at 8 a.m. Volunteers are needed and encouraged to visit the command center located at the Clear Lake Park boat ramp on NASA Parkway in Seabrook.

At about 10:15 p.m. Sunday, the search team was joined by The Silvetti Group and Legacy arrived with divers, who began searching shortly thereafter and continued diving until about 5 a.m. Monday.

The divers got a little rest on Monday morning before starting up again, Black said.

He added that numerous boaters, jet-skiers and kayakers, which can get into smaller spaces and shallows, came out all day Monday to assist with the search.

Black said that after scanning the lake bottom with sonar, divers must determine whether what they found is debris.

“We’re in a process of elimination right now,” he said.

The lake bed is covered with both concrete used to break up waves coming in from Galveston Bay, and debris from Hurricane Ike, all of which makes searching difficult.

“There’s so much debris and stuff out here it’s just really slow traveling right now,” Black said, adding that the group will continue its search until Zella is found or until the Harris County Constable Precinct 8, which is leading the search, calls it off.

Seen struggling

Zella apparently fell out of a kayak on Clear Lake near Clear Lake Park off Nasa Parkway about 12:30 p.m. Friday.

Witnesses had seen Zella, who had apparently been fishing near the NASA Parkway bridge, struggling with his kayak in the water on Friday and attempted to rescue him but were unsuccessful.

All day Friday, Saturday and Sunday, Coast Guard and Equusearch helicopters and police and fire rescue boats from Webster, Nassau Bay, Seabrook, Harris County constable and sheriff and Kemah scoured the area just south of the Nasa Parkway bridge between the boat ramp at Clear Lake Park and the Hilton Hotel.

Rescue attempt

Jason McPeak of Webster said he was sitting near his kayak, ready to eat lunch, when two acquaintances ran up and told him a man was struggling in his kayak in the water.

McPeak jumped in his own kayak and headed out toward Zella, but by the time he got there, the kayaker had disappeared.

The kayak had flipped over and and when McPeak turned it over, it was full of water. Fishing equipment and baggies with bait were in the kayak, he said.

Those who saw the Zella struggling said he was not wearing a life jacket and that he apparently was alone.

McPeak said the Zella’s kayak was small compared to his own. “I’ve got a small one but I wouldn’t take it out where he was trying to fish,’’ he said, explaining that the water was rough. “I got water in my kayak when I was trying to get out to him.’’

He estimated the water was about 12 to 14 feet deep where Zella disappeared.

Compliments for police

Black said he was pleased with the level of cooperation between all of the police agencies in the Bay Area, especially the Harris County Constable’s Preceinct 8 office, which controls the scene of the incident and the search.

“I couldn’t ask for no better,” Black said of Precinct 8.

“They bend over backwards any way they can.”

He added that he noticed the search effort was well-organized from the minute Equusearch was called in.

“Everybody just started working together, and I was impressed.”


http://www.hcnonline.com/articles/2009/02/24/bay_area_citizen/news/2kayak26.txt


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 02:13:02 PM


TROLLS! ::MonkeyDance:: LOGIC DICTATES JANET.In regards to the Persistence,as well as the cage/trap and it's contents.I believe some who believe it may be a diversion either work for,or are related to the crew!In my opinion i've seen a concerted effort to minimize,disregard, as well as rationalize kyle's word's and the photos of the contents without ANY reasoning!PERIOD..I think we've all asked as to WHY we should disregard Kyle's words and the events surrounding the cage and trap.I'm still waiting for something other then Kyle is a scammer,prankster,photoshopper!We get nothing.Wonder why?? ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

It boggles my mind.

Some want it both ways.  They will not undermine Kyle Kingman's words because they know those words reveal the truth but ... for some reason ... they uphold John Silvetti.

It is all about protecting John Silvetti and ... protecting John Silvetti implies that the messenger (Kermit) ... the Natalee's Freebirds' former administrator (Jen) ... the roboposter (Tamikosmom) and others ... must be discredited/intimidated in an attempt to silence.

In other words ... Kyle Kingman's words which implicate John Silvetti in the finale to the great Aruban coverup must be allowed to fade away ... to disappear.

Janet



You and I know each other's hearts well enough to understand - neither of us would ever let that happen.

And neither would anyone/everyone here who just wants to see justice done - and hopefully Natalee returned to her family.

Jen ... you and I are the most strong willed people I know.  When you and I are one on an issue ... there is no stopping us in our mutual mission.

  ::MonkeyWink::
 
Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:15:02 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!



Kermit
"Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.
Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!"

BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:16:45 PM
Keepthefaith, jen3560, Magnolia, vms, nonesuche, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, Anna, natalfan, johan555, Lifesong


As the Frog said.Follow the patterns!

They come in packs.....and I am not referring to Cub Scouts. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Keepthefaith, Anna, Tamikosmom, nonesuche, Lifesong, nimrod, Magnolia, jen3560, 2NJSons_Mom


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 02:18:08 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.

However ... when you and I are not one on an issue ... eveybody watch out!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Jen ... I contend that it is John Silvetti that is being protected and ... the agenda is to make Kyle Kingman's words of truth regarding Silvetti's betrayal to quietly go away by discrediting the messagers.

IMO

Love ya but ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 02:20:21 PM
I can't believe that anybody truly looking for justice for Natalee would be just A-OK with the contents of anything being turned over exclusively to ALE.

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 02:22:00 PM
Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14

http://www.legacyoffshore.com/diving_services.html


Legacy Offshore, LLC
128 Millstone Road, Louisiana, 70518-1470, United States.
Tel : 337-839-5550
Fax : 337-839-5595   Charles Zamora, VP
E-mail : charleszamora@legacyoffshore.com

Comprehensive Offshore & Inshore Dive Services


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 02:23:38 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.

However ... when you and I are not one on an issue ... eveybody watch out!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Jen ... I contend that it is John Silvetti that is being protected and ... the agenda is to make Kyle Kingman's words of truth regarding Silvetti's betrayal to quietly go away by discrediting the messagers.

IMO

Love ya but ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Love you too Janet!!!

And how right you are about how strong we can be...................AND how we can be at loggerheads!  ::MonkeyLaugh::  :smt058


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 02:23:54 PM
Keepthefaith, jen3560, Magnolia, vms, nonesuche, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, Anna, natalfan, johan555, Lifesong


As the Frog said.Follow the patterns!

They come in packs.....and I am not referring to Cub Scouts. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Keepthefaith, Anna, Tamikosmom, nonesuche, Lifesong, nimrod, Magnolia, jen3560, 2NJSons_Mom

I still have son's pinewood derby racer so we have a getaway car Magnolia  ::MonkeyHaHa:: maybe not as fast as Klaas' new wheels with the red button


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 24, 2009, 02:24:59 PM


Thanks for the dates/info on the Range Rover confessions, everyone.

I've got some other business to take care of over the next couple of days, but will be checking in on the thread regularly and working on the timeline, I do want to get the sourcing cleared up before I go back to adding more information.



The Rangerover confessions were taped on 5 occasions,

Jan 10
(Jan 11 was the Pauw and Witteman broadcast)
Jan 13, after Joran brought Paul and Anita to Schiphol airport, who were heading back to Aruba
Jan 15
and Jan 29.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 02:26:00 PM
Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14

http://www.legacyoffshore.com/diving_services.html


Legacy Offshore, LLC
128 Millstone Road, Louisiana, 70518-1470, United States.
Tel : 337-839-5550
Fax : 337-839-5595   Charles Zamora, VP
E-mail : charleszamora@legacyoffshore.com

Comprehensive Offshore & Inshore Dive Services



Legacy Offshore is an innovative provider in the area of subsea and topside construction. Operating at depths to 1000 feet, our specialized personnel provide construction and inspection services to both domestic and international markets. Legacy Offshore sustains its subsea and topside projects with an expanding fleet of diving support vessels, experienced offshore personnel, and a project management team with a proven track record in the Gulf of Mexico, Latin America and other foreign markets.


Launched in November 2007, Legacy Offshore consists of talented individuals with decades of proven experience from both the domestic and international oil and gas markets. From subsea to topside, Legacy is well-positioned to manage and execute all aspects of subsea projects.


Based in Broussard, Louisiana, and with offices in Houston, Texas as well, Legacy Offshore employs over 200 offshore personnel and over 60 onshore personnel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:33:59 PM
Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14

http://www.legacyoffshore.com/diving_services.html


Legacy Offshore, LLC
128 Millstone Road, Louisiana, 70518-1470, United States.
Tel : 337-839-5550
Fax : 337-839-5595   Charles Zamora, VP
E-mail : charleszamora@legacyoffshore.com

Comprehensive Offshore & Inshore Dive Services



Legacy Offshore is an innovative provider in the area of subsea and topside construction. Operating at depths to 1000 feet, our specialized personnel provide construction and inspection services to both domestic and international markets. Legacy Offshore sustains its subsea and topside projects with an expanding fleet of diving support vessels, experienced offshore personnel, and a project management team with a proven track record in the Gulf of Mexico, Latin America and other foreign markets.


Launched in November 2007, Legacy Offshore consists of talented individuals with decades of proven experience from both the domestic and international oil and gas markets. From subsea to topside, Legacy is well-positioned to manage and execute all aspects of subsea projects.


Based in Broussard, Louisiana, and with offices in Houston, Texas as well, Legacy Offshore employs over 200 offshore personnel and over 60 onshore personnel.


Let's not forget that Silvetti and his daughter set up a non-profit organization!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:37:19 PM
Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14

http://www.legacyoffshore.com/diving_services.html


Legacy Offshore, LLC
128 Millstone Road, Louisiana, 70518-1470, United States.
Tel : 337-839-5550
Fax : 337-839-5595   Charles Zamora, VP
E-mail : charleszamora@legacyoffshore.com

Comprehensive Offshore & Inshore Dive Services



Legacy Offshore is an innovative provider in the area of subsea and topside construction. Operating at depths to 1000 feet, our specialized personnel provide construction and inspection services to both domestic and international markets. Legacy Offshore sustains its subsea and topside projects with an expanding fleet of diving support vessels, experienced offshore personnel, and a project management team with a proven track record in the Gulf of Mexico, Latin America and other foreign markets.


Launched in November 2007, Legacy Offshore consists of talented individuals with decades of proven experience from both the domestic and international oil and gas markets. From subsea to topside, Legacy is well-positioned to manage and execute all aspects of subsea projects.


Based in Broussard, Louisiana, and with offices in Houston, Texas as well, Legacy Offshore employs over 200 offshore personnel and over 60 onshore personnel.


Let's not forget that Silvetti and his daughter set up a non-profit organization!

I stand corrected!

12/23/2008
John D. Silvetti, Conrad Daigle, and Marianne Silvetti-Voorhies register OSV Determination, L.L.C.;  a Louisiana limited liability company


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 02:41:48 PM


Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon   Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14
-----------------------

Boats owned by legacy:

Gulf Diver V

Gulmar Falcon


Sun River

Ocean Veritas


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 24, 2009, 02:42:19 PM
Aruba
Police Boat involved in accident at sea
24 Feb, 2009, 14:17 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - Two people were injured Sunday in an accident at sea between thepolice and an Inflatable boat PB2. The exact cause of the accident is still unknown, but because it is a vessel of the maritime police is, the case is investigated by the chief and the prosecutor.

The notification of the accident was around half past eight in the Central Post. The police boat PB2 was also aware that this is an accident with injuries is in the vicinity of the port. The police would be against an Inflatable boat of about three meters ascended. They were an adult man and a boy of around thirteen years. Both were at the head injured and the ambulance had to be transported to the hospital.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:46:08 PM


Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon   Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14
-----------------------

Boats owned by legacy:

Gulf Diver V

Gulmar Falcon


Sun River

Ocean Veritas


Here you go Jen3560

Superior Offshore International sells PSV, offers DSVFiled from Houston
4/15/2008 6:11:54 PM GMT




 
USA/GULF OF MEXICO: Financially troubled Superior Offshore International has closed the sale of platform support vessel (PSV) Gulf Diver V and selected onboard diving equipment to Legacy Offshore for US$4 million. Under the purchase agreement, Superior Offshore has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment for the same price on Oct. 1, 2008. Legacy Offshore provided a deposit of US$1.8 million in late March, which Superior Offshore used to make a scheduled payment on the charter of the diving support vessel (DSV) Gulmar Condor, which Superior Offshore would not have been able to make without the deposit.

http://www.energycurrent.com/index.php?id=4&storyid=9981


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 02:49:40 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 02:58:12 PM

Let's not forget that Silvetti and his daughter set up a non-profit organization!

I stand corrected!

12/23/2008
John D. Silvetti, Conrad Daigle, and Marianne Silvetti-Voorhies register OSV Determination, L.L.C.;  a Louisiana limited liability company

So many people are so skeptical in regards to giving from the heart to charitable organization today.  There is no assurance that donations for the most part will not be used to line the pockets of the organizers.

Over the years ... our church has experienced financial accountability from even church members in regards to expeditures.  The financial statements are scutinized and questioned at business meetings that last well into the night.  At one time ... the financial statements were gone over quickly and ... members chucked their copy into the waste basket on their way out of the sanctuary in a quest to be first at the local Tim Hortons so all the seats in the resturant could be saved.

I know that I will not donate through TES in regards to another search in Aruban waters for Natalee Holloway's remains without first asking many questions of Tim Miller in regard to the plan and ... who the plan includes.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:00:44 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 03:01:12 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.

However ... when you and I are not one on an issue ... eveybody watch out!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Jen ... I contend that it is John Silvetti that is being protected and ... the agenda is to make Kyle Kingman's words of truth regarding Silvetti's betrayal to quietly go away by discrediting the messagers.

IMO

Love ya but ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Love you too Janet!!!

And how right you are about how strong we can be...................AND how we can be at loggerheads!  ::MonkeyLaugh::  :smt058

:smt058


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:03:17 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:04:11 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

And the Condor as well, huh?

Yup - looking more and more to me like we've found his asset stash. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:10:04 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx

This agreement was signed on behalf of Legacy by:
Josh Koch 
 Agent for Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. 

-----------

Who is the other Koch name we've seen a lot of lately?  Or is it the same guy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:12:29 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx

This agreement was signed on behalf of Legacy by:
Josh Koch 
 Agent for Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. 

-----------

Who is the other Koch name we've seen a lot of lately?  Or is it the same guy?

R. Joshua Koch!Very interesting.Betcha it's the same guy. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:13:13 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx

This agreement was signed on behalf of Legacy by:
Josh Koch 
 Agent for Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. 

-----------

Who is the other Koch name we've seen a lot of lately?  Or is it the same guy?

R. Joshua Koch!Very interesting.Betcha it's the same guy. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool::  Betcha it is too!!!!  Now..............who did we find that he is associated with?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:16:36 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx

This agreement was signed on behalf of Legacy by:
Josh Koch 
 Agent for Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. 

-----------

Who is the other Koch name we've seen a lot of lately?  Or is it the same guy?

R. Joshua Koch!Very interesting.Betcha it's the same guy. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool::  Betcha it is too!!!!  Now..............who did we find that he is associated with?

Louis Schaefer Jr.!Anyone else that i missed?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:19:46 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx

This agreement was signed on behalf of Legacy by:
Josh Koch 
 Agent for Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. 

-----------

Who is the other Koch name we've seen a lot of lately?  Or is it the same guy?

R. Joshua Koch!Very interesting.Betcha it's the same guy. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool::  Betcha it is too!!!!  Now..............who did we find that he is associated with?

Louis Schaefer Jr.!Anyone else that i missed?

Yup - R Joshua Koch is/was a 10% owner/shareholder in Superior Offshore - AND Senior VP Counsel and Secretary, Director.

Offloaded a boatload of stock in October and November 2007.

Was he named in the Insider Trading class action suit?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 03:20:23 PM


Equusearch seems to have no problems working with the Silvetti Group.



Search for Missing Kayaker - Dr. Stephen Zella, in Seabrook, TX - TES needs searchers
Posted on 22. Feb, 2009 by B Tarr in Active Cases, Featured Articles, Missing Persons

02/23/09- Monday, Feb 23, 2009 - 6:30pm  The search for Dr Zella will continue tomorrow morning at Clear Lake Park.  We are still in need of boats, kayaks, jet skis and waverunners, in addition to people to act as observers on the boats.  All volunteers should report to the Command Center at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway at 8:00 am.

At this time, five boats have been deployed into Clear Lake using side scan sonar and other advanced technology to locate Stephen. Many of the boats and the dive teams will continue to work throughout the night.  At this point, Dr Zella has not yet been found, but our hopes are not dimmed that he will be found soon.  Our prayers, our thoughts, and our continued commitment remain with Dr Zella and his loving family and friends.

02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 4:15pm We have been asked to post the following message from the children of Dr. Stephen Zella:

We need volunteers to help in the fight to find my daddy. I love him so much.   If you can help the volunteers with a boat or kayak, please help them.
We have not stopped the search.
Lovingly,
Remington Zella, age 11 and Maxwell Zella, age 8


02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 1:45pm update: Multiple volunteers with boats and kayaks have shown up today to assist in the search for Stephen Zella. The kayaks are able to get into areas where the larger boats are unable to search, ensuring that we are able to do a thorough search of the area. Although high winds are making the search more difficult today, conditions have not stopped the volunteers in their effort to find Stephen. The search is still ongoing.

We continue to receive calls of concern and care from friends, neighbors,classmates and associates of Stephen and his family. The support shown by the community and friends has been outstanding, and we wish to extend our deepest thanks. Please, continue to keep Stephen and his family in your thoughts and prayers.

02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 Texas EquuSearch is in need of boats, kayaks, jet skis and wave runners to assist in today’s search for Dr. Zella, along with people to act as observers in the boats.  The Command Center is still located at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.

Last night, sonar equipment and divers worked late into the night in their efforts to find Dr. Zella. Our efforts will continue today with sonar teams scouring the bay area, Clear Lake and inlet streams.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 10:15 pm, Texas EquuSearch has been joined in the search for Dr. Zella by the Silvetti Group and Legacy Offshore Divers & Construction Company, both out of Louisiana. We will continue searching tonight, as long as possible.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 7:45pm,  Dr. Stephen Zella has not been located.  Texas EquuSearch will resume the search on Monday at 8:00am. We are asking for volunteers with shallow water boats, kayaks and jet-skis, along with foot searchers. The Command Center will remain at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway.  Search Coordinator Frank Black can be reached at 713-301-6813.

Although we have not yet found Dr. Zella, our hopes remain high that our search will be successful. We would like to extend our deepest thanks to the surrounding community, citizens and businesses alike, for their outstanding support and to local law enforcement for their tireless efforts and cooperation.

Please, continue to keep Dr. Zella and his loving family, friends and associates in your hearts and in your prayers.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 11:45 am, CST, multiple volunteers with Texas EquuSearch are on the scene searching for Dr. Stephen Zella.  Member Ted Miller is on scene with his personal helicopter to provide search assistance, along with multiple boats, other watercraft and foot searchers.  At this time, we have not yet found Dr. Zella, but we remain hopeful that today’s search will be successful.  We continue to keep the family in our prayers.

02/21/09 -Saturday evening update - Members of Texas EquuSearch spent the day searching for a missing kayaker on Clear Lake Saturday.  The missing man has been identified as well loved Dr. Stephen Zella, a 38 year old resident of the Clear Lake area.  Although we have not yet found Stephen, we plan on resuming a full-scale search on Sunday and our hopes are high that we will locate him and return him to his loving family.

Searchers are needed to assist in the search.  We are in need of searchers with jet-skis, kayaks and shallow water boats, in addition to foot searchers.  If you are able to assist, please come to the Command Center, located at the boat launch in Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.   The search will resume at 8:00 am.  The Search Coordinator is Frank Black, who can be reached at 713-301-6813.  Please see the link below for a map to the Command Center.

We ask that you continue to hold Stephen Zella, his loving family and friends close to your heart and in your prayers during this most difficult of times.

02/21/09 - Saturday, Feb. 21, 2009 - Texas EquuSearch is searching for a kayaker missing in Clear Lake Park this morning.  TES responded to a call for assistance from the Harris County Constable to assist in the search.  We are in dire need of shallow water boats, jet skis and foot searchers.  If you are able to assist, please report to the Command Center at Clear Lake Park, located at 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.  The Search Coordinator is Frank Black, and he can be reached at 713-301-6813.

http://texasequusearch.org/2009/02/search-for-missing-kayaker-in-seabrook-tx-tes-needs-searchers/


********************


Search team hopes they are close to finding missing kayaker

Bay Area Citizen
By DANA GUTHRIE
Updated: 02.24.09
Even more boats and volunteers arrived at Clear Lake Park in Seabrook Tuesday morning to aid in the search for Dr. Stephen Zella, who disappeared from his kayak on Friday near the NASA Parkway bridge.

"I think we're close, I really do," said Frank Black, search coordinator for Equusearch, which has been on the scene since Saturday. "I hope we'll have something positive today."

On Monday, a note was posted on the Equusearch website from Zella's children, 11-year-old daughter Remington and 8-year-old son Maxwell.


"We need volunteers to help in the fight to find my daddy. I love him so much.   If you can help the volunteers with a boat or kayak, please help them. We have not stopped the search."


The community response during the search for Zella has been “phenomenal,” Black said Monday afternoon at about 4 p.m.

“We’re determined to find him now."

Most of the day Monday, high winds stirred up the waters near the Clear Lake Park boat ramp, where Zella, 38, disappeared early Friday afternoon, leaving only his kayak, fishing equipment and bait behind.

Friends and family members from across the country are paying close attention to the search for the Nassau Bay psychiatrist, who worked for The Watershed, a drug and alcohol counseling group in Webster, until it shut down about a month ago.

On Monday, five different groups were using sonar equipment to scan the bottom of Clear Lake — League City, Nassau Bay, the Montgomery County Constable’s office and The Silvetti Group and Legacy Offshore Divers & Construction Co., both of Louisiana, Black said. Equusearch said the sonar teams and divers will work through most of Monday night.

“The winds have not let up on us to allow us to do anything much until now,” Black said Monday afternoon.

The search will continue on Tuesday beginning at 8 a.m. Volunteers are needed and encouraged to visit the command center located at the Clear Lake Park boat ramp on NASA Parkway in Seabrook.

At about 10:15 p.m. Sunday, the search team was joined by The Silvetti Group and Legacy arrived with divers, who began searching shortly thereafter and continued diving until about 5 a.m. Monday.

The divers got a little rest on Monday morning before starting up again, Black said.

He added that numerous boaters, jet-skiers and kayakers, which can get into smaller spaces and shallows, came out all day Monday to assist with the search.

Black said that after scanning the lake bottom with sonar, divers must determine whether what they found is debris.

“We’re in a process of elimination right now,” he said.

The lake bed is covered with both concrete used to break up waves coming in from Galveston Bay, and debris from Hurricane Ike, all of which makes searching difficult.

“There’s so much debris and stuff out here it’s just really slow traveling right now,” Black said, adding that the group will continue its search until Zella is found or until the Harris County Constable Precinct 8, which is leading the search, calls it off.

Seen struggling

Zella apparently fell out of a kayak on Clear Lake near Clear Lake Park off Nasa Parkway about 12:30 p.m. Friday.

Witnesses had seen Zella, who had apparently been fishing near the NASA Parkway bridge, struggling with his kayak in the water on Friday and attempted to rescue him but were unsuccessful.

All day Friday, Saturday and Sunday, Coast Guard and Equusearch helicopters and police and fire rescue boats from Webster, Nassau Bay, Seabrook, Harris County constable and sheriff and Kemah scoured the area just south of the Nasa Parkway bridge between the boat ramp at Clear Lake Park and the Hilton Hotel.

Rescue attempt

Jason McPeak of Webster said he was sitting near his kayak, ready to eat lunch, when two acquaintances ran up and told him a man was struggling in his kayak in the water.

McPeak jumped in his own kayak and headed out toward Zella, but by the time he got there, the kayaker had disappeared.

The kayak had flipped over and and when McPeak turned it over, it was full of water. Fishing equipment and baggies with bait were in the kayak, he said.

Those who saw the Zella struggling said he was not wearing a life jacket and that he apparently was alone.

McPeak said the Zella’s kayak was small compared to his own. “I’ve got a small one but I wouldn’t take it out where he was trying to fish,’’ he said, explaining that the water was rough. “I got water in my kayak when I was trying to get out to him.’’

He estimated the water was about 12 to 14 feet deep where Zella disappeared.

Compliments for police

Black said he was pleased with the level of cooperation between all of the police agencies in the Bay Area, especially the Harris County Constable’s Preceinct 8 office, which controls the scene of the incident and the search.

“I couldn’t ask for no better,” Black said of Precinct 8.

“They bend over backwards any way they can.”

He added that he noticed the search effort was well-organized from the minute Equusearch was called in.

“Everybody just started working together, and I was impressed.”


http://www.hcnonline.com/articles/2009/02/24/bay_area_citizen/news/2kayak26.txt

.... and this bothers me when you consider Kyle Kingman's own words in regards to John Silvetti's betrayal of the those who donated through TES toward the cost of Persistence search of Natalee Holloway's remains.  Those who sacrifically gave ... did not expect a discovery to be handed blindly over to the enemy who has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway and put her family through a H--- on Earth since May 30, 2005.

Hey ... VMS where did you come from?  How are you doing?

Janet

+++++++


BETRAYAL!!

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

John Silvetti

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
 
Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me.

Kyle: Mr. Red Shirt came on the Persistence along with Dolf, Mos, et al for the meeting on the 30th."

Kyle:   This is certainly NOT John Silvetti. I do not know this man. He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:21:46 PM
   
Item 8.01   Other Events.

     On April 4, 2008, the Company consummated the sale of the Gulf Diver V, a four-point vessel, and selected diving equipment on board such vessel to Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. for $4,000,000. Under the purchase agreement relating to the sale of the vessel, the Company has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment from Legacy Offshore for $4,000,000 on October 1, 2008. As previously disclosed, the Company expects to recognize an impairment of up to $2,000,000 in connection with the sale of the vessel. Legacy Offshore provided the Company a deposit of $1,800,000 on March 28, 2008, that was used by the Company to make a scheduled payment under the charter agreement for the Gulmar Condor, a dynamically positioned vessel. The Company did not otherwise have the funds to make the charter payment and believes that the charter would have been terminated by the vessel owner had the payment not been made on such date. Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., the Chairman of the Board of the Company until November 14, 2007 and a current stockholder of the Company, is a member of Legacy Offshore.  

http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRu.t26f.htm

What do we have here Jen3560?? ::MonkeyWink::

Looks to me like we have Shaefer's little hidey hole for assets.............maybe.

And we also have a new company to take a lookie loo at for possible contract awards.

And we have another link between Silvetti and Shaefer - looks like they continue to be joined at the hip.

I, for one, do NOT think it's a coinky dink that Legacy was formed in November 2007.

Wonder who the other principals/"members" of Legacy are?


ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF APRIL 3, 2008
BY AND BETWEEN
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND
LEGACY OFFSHORE, L.L.C.

http://sec.edgar-online.com/superior-offshore-international-inc/8-k-current-report-filing/2008/04/15/Section8.aspx

This agreement was signed on behalf of Legacy by:
Josh Koch 
 Agent for Legacy Offshore, L.L.C. 

-----------

Who is the other Koch name we've seen a lot of lately?  Or is it the same guy?

R. Joshua Koch!Very interesting.Betcha it's the same guy. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyCool::  Betcha it is too!!!!  Now..............who did we find that he is associated with?

Louis Schaefer Jr.!Anyone else that i missed?

Yup - R Joshua Koch is/was a 10% owner/shareholder in Superior Offshore - AND Senior VP Counsel and Secretary, Director.

Offloaded a boatload of stock in October and November 2007.

Was he named in the Insider Trading class action suit?

I believe so but,would like the link to back it up so will search to see who all is on that list!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: vms on February 24, 2009, 03:22:11 PM
Legacy Offshore is Schaefer's company which means Equusearch is still working with Silvetti and Schaefer.

Why would it be strange to find connections to Silvetti and Schaefer? Maybe they did business together before and after the Persistence search. What would be stange about that? What am I missing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:22:48 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:24:23 PM
Legacy Offshore is Schaefer's company which means Equusearch is still working with Silvetti and Schaefer.

Why would it be strange to find connections to Silvetti and Schaefer? Maybe they did business together before and after the Persistence search. What would be stange about that? What am I missing?

I don't find it strange at all.  In fact, just the other week we found a link that shows they worked together prior to November 2007.

Nope.  I don't find it strange at all.

I'm rather glad to find these continued links of the relationship.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:25:19 PM
Legacy Offshore is Schaefer's company which means Equusearch is still working with Silvetti and Schaefer.

Why would it be strange to find connections to Silvetti and Schaefer? Maybe they did business together before and after the Persistence search. What would be stange about that? What am I missing?

I don't find it strange at all.  In fact, just the other week we found a link that shows they worked together prior to November 2007.

Nope.  I don't find it strange at all.

I'm rather glad to find these continued links of the relationship.  ::MonkeyCool::

Yes indeed!Would appreciate anything else VMS would like to bring forward!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:27:15 PM
Keepthefaith, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, jen3560, wreck, cp405, Magnolia, Patriot, bastibro, Poochy, johan555 and 17 Guests are

Patterns....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:28:12 PM
Keepthefaith, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, jen3560, wreck, cp405, Magnolia, Patriot, bastibro, Poochy, johan555 and 17 Guests are

Patterns....



Where is that darn Frog?Janet.You better have some Shoe-Fly pie ready! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:35:02 PM
So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself)

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:35:36 PM
With the acquisition of the Horizon Offshore assets in December, 2007, we felt that by adding those assets, the pipe laying and [derrick] barge assets, with our legacy diving assets, we’d offer the client base a superior construction solution on an integrated basis. We also believed that that combined fleet would drive utilization for each.

 http://seekingalpha.com/article/121269-cal-dive-international-inc-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=2


I wonder if this is in reference to Legacy Offshore??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 03:36:06 PM
Keepthefaith, Tamikosmom, 2NJSons_Mom, jen3560, wreck, cp405, Magnolia, Patriot, bastibro, Poochy, johan555 and 17 Guests are

Patterns....



Where is that darn Frog?Janet.You better have some Shoe-Fly pie ready! ::MonkeyDance::

I can take it out of the freezer ... and put it in the oven on a moment's notice.

Kermit will be pleased.  The pond is no longer frozen over and the pathway leading to it is no longer covered with snow.  I will get Veggie to check the small bulbs in the Japanese laterns that outline that small body of water.  In a couple of months Kermit can swim with some large Goldfish that will take up residence.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:36:37 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:36:51 PM
With the acquisition of the Horizon Offshore assets in December, 2007, we felt that by adding those assets, the pipe laying and [derrick] barge assets, with our legacy diving assets, we’d offer the client base a superior construction solution on an integrated basis. We also believed that that combined fleet would drive utilization for each.

 http://seekingalpha.com/article/121269-cal-dive-international-inc-q4-2008-earnings-call-transcript?page=2


I wonder if this is in reference to Legacy Offshore??

It may just be a piece of equipment!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:40:40 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

POWER OF ATTORNEY
        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., or either of them signing singly, and with full power of substitution, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of Superior Offshore International, Inc.,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:41:15 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

POWER OF ATTORNEY
        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., or either of them signing singly, and with full power of substitution, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of Superior Offshore International, Inc.,


The Link..

http://www.secinfo.com/d14sr8.unVy.d.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:44:21 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

POWER OF ATTORNEY
        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., or either of them signing singly, and with full power of substitution, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of Superior Offshore International, Inc.,


So he acted as Power of Atty for Superior, and as Representative for Legacy.

WAY hinky!!

AND - he's manager/general partner of Shaefer Holdings

Schaefer Holdings, LP
9302 LAMBRIGHT ROAD
HOUSTON, TX 77075

R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC

/ R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC, the general partner of Schaefer Holdings, LP
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=42yAWJJHBrCpUnB&ID=5112577


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 03:45:02 PM
IMO, we need to find out who the other principals/owners/partners/members of Legacy are......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 03:48:27 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 03:52:24 PM
You don't get a class action lawsuit filed against you for philanthropic endeavors.

Just saying. . . . . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 24, 2009, 03:53:21 PM
AIVD remains in Aruba

AMSTERDAM - Intelligence AIVD does not Aruba. This is despite the request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber who wants all of the island AIVD'ers leave.

Writes that Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld (CDA) in a letter to the Lower House.

Bijleveld says no reason to try to meet a request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

 

Croes


The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes said the AIVD'ers to want, after an internal report of the Dutch Representation in Aruba was held.

He played it to the media, wrote Bijleveld. That he deliberately reporting the publicity has, Bijleveld called 'bad'.

Harassment

In reporting to Aruban politicians and their relatives are not spared. Thus Croes' the ramkoers-role and the electorate happy, while a nephew of Croes and the son of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber intimidate people. The Aruban Minister accused the Netherlands after the leak of intelligence reporting.

Liason


In Aruba is Bijleveld since 2006 with the Aruban government liaison work of the AIVD. This liaison officer to maintain contact with intelligence and security services in Latin America and the Caribbean, requires the Secretary of State.

The liaison is not involved in the creation of the weekly messages, one of which ended up in Croes, set Bijleveld.

Confidential

The reporting was due to 'human error' in an Aruban official right, let Bijleveld know. An official of the Ministry of Justice sent the reporting accidentally mailed to an Aruban official.

"There is no evidence that this is not done in good faith." The document was very much given that it had to be treated confidentially.

Damage


The Aruban officials played the message to Croes, while Justice officials have unsuccessfully tried to e-mail retrieval.

Bijleveld acknowledged in the letter that the relationship between the Netherlands and Aruba by reporting damage has occurred. It good to have had talks with Oduber about the incident. On this basis, they think that the relationship soon again in a calmer waters will state. "

http://www.nu.nl/algemeen/1922923/aivd-blijft-op-aruba.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:55:08 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

POWER OF ATTORNEY
        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., or either of them signing singly, and with full power of substitution, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of Superior Offshore International, Inc.,


So he acted as Power of Atty for Superior, and as Representative for Legacy.

WAY hinky!!

AND - he's manager/general partner of Shaefer Holdings

Schaefer Holdings, LP
9302 LAMBRIGHT ROAD
HOUSTON, TX 77075

R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC

/ R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC, the general partner of Schaefer Holdings, LP
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=42yAWJJHBrCpUnB&ID=5112577


Defendant Mermis liquidated over $980,000 in Superior Offshore stock,Defendant Koch liquidatedover $2.9 million, Defendant Burks liquidated over $550,000, and Defendant Schaefer profited over$45 million from his sales of Company shares during the Class Period.


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 03:58:16 PM
Hey ... the shared research regarding John Silvetti and Louis Schaefer is incredible.  I have a feeling when all the facts are compiled the outcome will result in a very interesting story.

Keep up the good work while ... I bolt.  A walk on the banks of the mighty Fraser River with Brandi is where it is at.  Under duress ... my hubby will accompany me.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
1:00 PM PT



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 03:58:27 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 03:58:52 PM
I need some help please When did Silvetti ask for Donations at BFN and what address did he ask the donations be sent to....

Also can anyone tell me the date of this article....TIA

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=7429813

I have been at Dr appointments all day with DH so I'm just now getting to research some more on the PO Box in Kemah but I do have it narrowed down to a few names.

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 04:02:19 PM
I need some help please When did Silvetti ask for Donations at BFN and what address did he ask the donations be sent to....

Also can anyone tell me the date of this article....TIA

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=7429813

I have been at Dr appointments all day with DH so I'm just now getting to research some more on the PO Box in Kemah but I do have it narrowed down to a few names.

 ::MonkeyWink::

I believe the date was April 3rd 2008!Can anyone help with an address?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:05:00 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

POWER OF ATTORNEY
        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., or either of them signing singly, and with full power of substitution, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of Superior Offshore International, Inc.,


So he acted as Power of Atty for Superior, and as Representative for Legacy.

WAY hinky!!

AND - he's manager/general partner of Shaefer Holdings

Schaefer Holdings, LP
9302 LAMBRIGHT ROAD
HOUSTON, TX 77075

R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC

/ R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC, the general partner of Schaefer Holdings, LP
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=42yAWJJHBrCpUnB&ID=5112577


Defendant Mermis liquidated over $980,000 in Superior Offshore stock,Defendant Koch liquidatedover $2.9 million, Defendant Burks liquidated over $550,000, and Defendant Schaefer profited over$45 million from his sales of Company shares during the Class Period.


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


HA!!!!

So, co-defendants in a class action suit worked together to shuffle assets from Superior to Legacy.

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:14:23 PM
I need some help please When did Silvetti ask for Donations at BFN and what address did he ask the donations be sent to....

Also can anyone tell me the date of this article....TIA

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=7429813

I have been at Dr appointments all day with DH so I'm just now getting to research some more on the PO Box in Kemah but I do have it narrowed down to a few names.

 ::MonkeyWink::

No address was given for donations, but here are his posts.  Included are the surrounding posts, to keep it all in context:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334979#msg334979

LegallyLex Hero Member Posts: 551
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
on: April 03, 2008, 06:46:44 PM »

Hey everyone, I am finally getting my brother John Silvetti on here in a few minutes. If you have any questions about the Persistence and search that he may answer, I am sure he will... (if it isn't confidential) Give me a few minutes!



jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #4 on: April 03, 2008, 07:19:47 PM »

I would like to give everyone at BFN an update on where we stand. The Persistence completed surveying the initial and extended grids. Basically, this means that the sonar survey was completed. Over 275 targets of interest were picked up and analyzed by the sonar interpreters. Only 25% of the targets were investigated by the ROV. At that point, we had run out of money and weather. Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could. However, that was all based on the initial survey grid. Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments. The weather had continually increased until we were constantly facing 20 ft. seas. The Persistence can handle 20 foot seas, however, it is very dangerous for the crew and impossible to collect data. It was taking us 3 days to complete what took us only 1 day the month before. It was time to call it off. This was a very difficult thing to do as we had all prepared ourselves to either find Natalee or not. None of us were prepared to leave not knowing one way or the other. I believe once the reality set in that we were going to leave without knowing, that was the lowest point in morale of the entire trip. It took a few days for everyone to shake it off and complete what we could.


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #10 on: April 03, 2008, 07:34:08 PM »

Thank you Jamie for your kind words. You must realize that the support that everyone posted daily kept us upbeat and working. You all were truly there with us. We are currently looking for an ROV vessel we can work with to return to complete the target investigations later in the year. I just returned last night from New England where I looked at a vessel that was being considered to do this with.The surveyors from the Persistence were also working with the Maritime Police and Prosecutor's Office utilizing bottom scanning sonar in ponds and murky bodies of water. This is ongoing, however, the strike on the island has brought this to a halt until the strike is settled. Rumors claim this may happen on Monday.


Debbie AdministratorHero Member Posts: 26257
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #12 on: April 03, 2008, 07:42:21 PM »

John, what can we do to insure that the search is completed?Also, when the cage was found that was shown on Dateline (pictures also hit the internet) what thoughts, emotions, etc... went through your mind? Can you elaborate on that for us? Thanks!


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world.The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after. It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found her. I don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!


LegallyLex Hero Member Posts: 551
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #15 on: April 03, 2008, 07:55:25 PM »

John, a lot of BFN posters have asked me how much money would be needed to complete the search. Can you provide an estimate on what amount would be needed?


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «

Reply #16 on: April 03, 2008, 07:58:19 PM »

It is very difficult to say, since Louis has not selected a ROV vessel and we do not know how much of a humanitarian discount we can count on by the vessel and ROV owners, but my guess is that we will be looking at around 1 million dollars


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 04:15:40 PM
Edited to add in red


So let me make sure I've got this straight in my head.............

October/November 2007 - MAJOR stock dump by Shaefer and Koch

November 2007 - Shaefer and Koch  and ?? start up Legacy Diving

November 2007 - An unknown individual solicits donations for the Aruba search, in connection with Silvetti

November 2007 - Superior (Shaefer) and Persistence (Sivletti) head for Aruba

April 3 2008 - Superior (Shaefer) sells at least 3 ships to Legacy (himself) with a leaseback option for Superior (himself), facilitated by Koch representing Legacy

Superior (Shaefer) makes one (at least) lease back payment to Legacy (himself)

April 2008 - Superior files for bankruptcy.

So now we have Legacy owning (at least) 3 ships = Shaefer STILL owns them, PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS that exchanged hands in the sale/purchase/leaseback option.  PLUS the MEGA MILLIONS he/they got in the stock dump in Oct/Nov 2007.

April 3 2008 - Silvetti is still asking for donations at BFN (to the tune of one million $$)

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::

POWER OF ATTORNEY
        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., or either of them signing singly, and with full power of substitution, the undersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: (1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as an officer and/or director of Superior Offshore International, Inc.,


So he acted as Power of Atty for Superior, and as Representative for Legacy.

WAY hinky!!

AND - he's manager/general partner of Shaefer Holdings

Schaefer Holdings, LP
9302 LAMBRIGHT ROAD
HOUSTON, TX 77075

R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC

/ R. Joshua Koch, Jr., Manager of Schaefer Holdings GP LLC, the general partner of Schaefer Holdings, LP
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=42yAWJJHBrCpUnB&ID=5112577


Defendant Mermis liquidated over $980,000 in Superior Offshore stock,Defendant Koch liquidatedover $2.9 million, Defendant Burks liquidated over $550,000, and Defendant Schaefer profited over$45 million from his sales of Company shares during the Class Period.


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


HA!!!!

So, co-defendants in a class action suit worked together to shuffle assets from Superior to Legacy.

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

When i get a chance i will read the whole court.Seems the people where doing some really "HINKY" stuff,with Superior Offshore,to say the least.It looks that these people are playing three card monty with their assets.Catch me if you can?Not just Schaefer and Koch but the others as well!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 04:23:20 PM
You don't get a class action lawsuit filed against you for philanthropic endeavors.

Just saying. . . . . .


No, you sure don't!  What these people claim was done to them does seem supported by the facts and times of sale of those with insider information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 04:25:12 PM
I was seriously considering buying some of the DEEP stock myself at one time.  Good thing I reconsidered!

I wonder how those who uphold the actions of these companies would feel if they had personally done so themselves.  Or put their whole IRA or 401K into this company? 

Would they still uphold these individuals in that case?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 04:28:58 PM
I need some help please When did Silvetti ask for Donations at BFN and what address did he ask the donations be sent to....

Also can anyone tell me the date of this article....TIA

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=7429813

I have been at Dr appointments all day with DH so I'm just now getting to research some more on the PO Box in Kemah but I do have it narrowed down to a few names.

 ::MonkeyWink::

No address was given for donations, but here are his posts.  Included are the surrounding posts, to keep it all in context:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334979#msg334979

LegallyLex Hero Member Posts: 551
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
on: April 03, 2008, 06:46:44 PM »

Hey everyone, I am finally getting my brother John Silvetti on here in a few minutes. If you have any questions about the Persistence and search that he may answer, I am sure he will... (if it isn't confidential) Give me a few minutes!



jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #4 on: April 03, 2008, 07:19:47 PM »

I would like to give everyone at BFN an update on where we stand. The Persistence completed surveying the initial and extended grids. Basically, this means that the sonar survey was completed. Over 275 targets of interest were picked up and analyzed by the sonar interpreters. Only 25% of the targets were investigated by the ROV. At that point, we had run out of money and weather. Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could. However, that was all based on the initial survey grid. Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments. The weather had continually increased until we were constantly facing 20 ft. seas. The Persistence can handle 20 foot seas, however, it is very dangerous for the crew and impossible to collect data. It was taking us 3 days to complete what took us only 1 day the month before. It was time to call it off. This was a very difficult thing to do as we had all prepared ourselves to either find Natalee or not. None of us were prepared to leave not knowing one way or the other. I believe once the reality set in that we were going to leave without knowing, that was the lowest point in morale of the entire trip. It took a few days for everyone to shake it off and complete what we could.


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #10 on: April 03, 2008, 07:34:08 PM »

Thank you Jamie for your kind words. You must realize that the support that everyone posted daily kept us upbeat and working. You all were truly there with us. We are currently looking for an ROV vessel we can work with to return to complete the target investigations later in the year. I just returned last night from New England where I looked at a vessel that was being considered to do this with.The surveyors from the Persistence were also working with the Maritime Police and Prosecutor's Office utilizing bottom scanning sonar in ponds and murky bodies of water. This is ongoing, however, the strike on the island has brought this to a halt until the strike is settled. Rumors claim this may happen on Monday.


Debbie AdministratorHero Member Posts: 26257
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #12 on: April 03, 2008, 07:42:21 PM »

John, what can we do to insure that the search is completed?Also, when the cage was found that was shown on Dateline (pictures also hit the internet) what thoughts, emotions, etc... went through your mind? Can you elaborate on that for us? Thanks!


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world.The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after. It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found her. I don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!


LegallyLex Hero Member Posts: 551
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #15 on: April 03, 2008, 07:55:25 PM »

John, a lot of BFN posters have asked me how much money would be needed to complete the search. Can you provide an estimate on what amount would be needed?


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «

Reply #16 on: April 03, 2008, 07:58:19 PM »

It is very difficult to say, since Louis has not selected a ROV vessel and we do not know how much of a humanitarian discount we can count on by the vessel and ROV owners, but my guess is that we will be looking at around 1 million dollars
Thank You Jen.....So if I'm reading this right the PO Box in Kemah has nothing to do with the April 2008 date of where to send donations.....the PO Box relates to Donations prior to the Persistence leaving Louisiana....Right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:29:54 PM


Defendant Mermisliquidated over $980,000 in Superior Offshore stock,Defendant Koch liquidatedover $2.9 million, Defendant Burks liquidated over $550,000, and Defendant Schaefer profited over$45 million from his sales of Company shares during the Class Period.


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


HA!!!!

So, co-defendants in a class action suit worked together to shuffle assets from Superior to Legacy.

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

From above we also have defendants:

Mermis
Burks

And here is when they named Donald Terry as as Superior's Interim President and Chief Executive Officer.

Donald Terry is the guy who signed the sale/buyback agreement with Legacy.

And lookie at where the names Mermis and Burks come in:

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-28-2008/0004743641&EDATE=

Superior Offshore International Announces Appointment of E. Donald Terry as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
 


    HOUSTON, Jan. 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Superior Offshore
International, Inc. (Nasdaq: DEEP) today announced that its Board of
Directors has unanimously approved the appointment of E. Donald Terry,
currently an independent director of Superior Offshore, as the Company's
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer until a successor is named,
effective immediately. Mr. Terry's appointment followed James J. Mermis'
resignation as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the
Company. Mr. Mermis plans to join Kaplan Industry as its President of
Technical Operations.

    James L. Persky, Superior Offshore's independent Chairman of the Board,
said, "Don Terry is the natural choice to lead Superior Offshore during
this interim period. Don comes to Superior Offshore with a wealth of
operational and leadership expertise earned during his 45 years in the
subsea construction and commercial diving industry. His extensive
experience in our industry gives him immediate insight into the business
and operations of Superior Offshore and the needs and expectations of our
customers. He has a solid track record of helping companies successfully
take advantage of new opportunities while addressing current challenges."

    Louis E. Schaefer, Jr., Superior Offshore's founder and largest
shareholder, said, "I am extremely pleased that Don Terry has agreed to
lead Superior Offshore. Don has successfully founded, grown and managed a
number of subsea construction and commercial diving companies and, as a
current independent director, he is already familiar with the Company and
its customers and dedicated employees. I am confident that Don will provide
Superior Offshore with leadership and stability and I fully support his
appointment as interim CEO."

    Mr. Terry said, "I am honored that the Board has selected me to lead
Superior Offshore on an interim basis, and I am excited about Superior
Offshore's significant strengths and dedicated employees. Working with the
Superior Offshore team, I am fully committed to continuing the Company's
focus on operational excellence and superior customer service and I will
work to grow the Company and deliver value to our shareholders."

    About E. Donald Terry

    Mr. Terry has over 45 years of experience in the subsea construction
and commercial diving industry. Mr. Terry has been an independent director
of Superior Offshore since April 2007. During 2003, Mr. Terry was a
consultant for Horizon Offshore, Inc., a provider of marine construction
services. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Terry was Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Terry Offshore, Inc., an offshore energy services
company. From 1995 to 1998, Mr. Terry was Worldwide General Manager of
McDermott Underwater Services, a marine underwater engineering and
construction company. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Terry was Vice President of
Offshore Pipelines, Inc., a marine engineering and construction company.
From 1988 to 1992, Mr. Terry was President and Chief Operating Officer and
a director of Offshore Petroleum Divers, Inc., an offshore commercial
diving company, which he co-founded in 1988. From 1979 to 1988, Mr. Terry
served in a number of capacities with Cal Dive International Inc., an
offshore commercial diving company, including as President and Chief
Operating Officer from 1985 to 1988, Vice President -- Americas from 1981
to 1985, and a director from 1979 to 1988.

    About Superior Offshore International, Inc.

    Superior Offshore is a leading provider of subsea construction and
commercial diving services to the offshore oil and gas industry, serving
operators internationally and domestically in the outer continental shelf
of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Construction services include installation,
upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and production infrastructure.
Commercial diving services include inspection, maintenance and repair
services and support services for subsea construction and salvage
operations. The company also operates a construction/fabrication division.
Superior Offshore operates a fleet of nine service vessels and provides
remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) and saturation diving systems for
deepwater and harsh environment operations.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements contained in this news release are forward-looking
statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or
may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could
significantly affect expected results, and actual future results could
differ materially from those described in such statements. Although it is
not possible to identify all factors, we continue to face many risks and
uncertainties. Some of the factors that could cause actual future results
to differ materially are described under the caption "Risk Factors" in our
Prospectus, dated April 19, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC") on April 20, 2007, and our other filings with the SEC,
which may be obtained by visiting the Investor Relations section of our
website under "Financial Information" at http://www.superioroffshore.com or
from the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.


    Contacts:
    Superior Offshore International
    Roger Burks, Executive VP & CFO
    roger.burks@superioroffshore.com
    713-910-1875

    DRG&E
    Ken Dennard
    ksdennard@drg-e.com
    713-529-6600
--------------

So - one more co-defendant jumped ship (Mermis) while yet another co-defendant ()Burks) names Terry as Interim President, and Terry then signs the agreement with Legacy.

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 04:30:08 PM
d)Defendant R. Joshua Koch ("Koch") was Senior Vice President, GeneralCounsel, Secretary, and a member of the Board ofDirectors of Superior Offshore at the time oftheIPO. Defendant Koch prepared and signed the materially untrue and misleading RegistrationStatement. In connection with the IPO, defendant Koch sold and/or disposed of over 1.5 millionshares of Company shares that he owned or controlled, to realize gross proceeds of $22. 5 million.During the Class Period, defendant Koch also sold nearly an additional 350,000 shares he ownedand/or controlled to realize additional gross proceeds of over $2.9 million.9


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

He was a little more than involved would you say??

From reading it seems Schaefer was also paying his son's company Greenhead rentals.Another company worth looking at!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:31:12 PM
You don't get a class action lawsuit filed against you for philanthropic endeavors.

Just saying. . . . . .


No, you sure don't!  What these people claim was done to them does seem supported by the facts and times of sale of those with insider information.

And then some!!

I sure hope these plaintiff's attorneys know all about what we've just discovered!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:32:25 PM
Hotping - that's correct.

You'll be looking for whomever that box was registered to in (at least) November 2007.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:33:40 PM
d)Defendant R. Joshua Koch ("Koch") was Senior Vice President, GeneralCounsel, Secretary, and a member of the Board ofDirectors of Superior Offshore at the time oftheIPO. Defendant Koch prepared and signed the materially untrue and misleading RegistrationStatement. In connection with the IPO, defendant Koch sold and/or disposed of over 1.5 millionshares of Company shares that he owned or controlled, to realize gross proceeds of $22. 5 million.During the Class Period, defendant Koch also sold nearly an additional 350,000 shares he ownedand/or controlled to realize additional gross proceeds of over $2.9 million.9


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

He was a little more than involved would you say??

From reading it seems Schaefer was also paying his son's company Greenhead rentals.Another company worth looking at!




I would say so!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 04:36:22 PM
I was seriously considering buying some of the DEEP stock myself at one time.  Good thing I reconsidered!

I wonder how those who uphold the actions of these companies would feel if they had personally done so themselves.  Or put their whole IRA or 401K into this company? 

Would they still uphold these individuals in that case?





Well, Anna, there is still ample opportunity for them to still get on board with one of these companies owned by the same parties.

Why does something tell me that even those who support or claim to support these individuals will not be doing that?


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 04:38:17 PM
As far as asking for last minute donations, I believe that was in March and if I'm not mistaken they asked for donations to be sent to TES (at that time).

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=7921.msg327458#msg327458

While searching I found this post of Kyles that has always bothered me.  My comments in Red:



Dateline made many grievous mistakes in the broadcast.  To name a few:
 
1) My biggest problem with it --  they failed to mention or include any interview from John Silvetti, the owner of the Persistence and field project manager of the search. He was just as influencial to the project as TM. Really?  See #5.  If it was a TES documentary then why are you mad they didn't intervew Silvetti?

2) They included a statement by Dave H. which said we could find a quarter on the seafloor with our equipment.  We do not have the ability to detect a quarter on the seafloor.  To anyone in the industry, this is silly.  BFD

3) the trap was not found where Tim Miller guessed or had a feeling it would be.

4) the broadcast gave the impression that they knew the type of trap which was allegedly stolen from the fishermen's huts.  They speculated on the missing trap using added file footage. WTF did you expect?  It's TV, they like to over dramatize.

5)  the broadcast was supposed to be a documentary on TES and Tim Miller, not the search for Natalee Holloway.  It seems they used Tim Miller to get the scoop on the search.  Now Kyle, you can't be this stupid.  You think Dateline decided to come along on the ship because they love sailing? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:46:53 PM
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::  klaas!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 04:47:05 PM
 Forexample, according to CW 1, around the time of the IPO,Mermis was trying to attain a project out of Venezuela. Rather than securing that work for Superior, Mermis instead sent the project to Kaplan Industry - a Company he joined after the bankruptcy.24


http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:YzXYM0VYK8cJ:securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/2008721_r01c_08-00687.pdf+Legacy+offshore+R+joshua+koch&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:49:18 PM
klaas - I spoke with TES' office in March 2008 - and yes, they were still receiving donations for the ocean search thru their office.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 04:49:31 PM
Hotping - that's correct.

You'll be looking for whomever that box was registered to in (at least) November 2007.
Thanks Jen......I just wanted verification from another Monkey that I was on the right track....I checked with the PO and it was definitely listed to an individual in November 2007..... I have the list narrowed even more now....I'll post the names later to see if any of You recognize a name..... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 04:51:37 PM
klaas - I spoke with TES' office in March 2008 - and yes, they were still receiving donations for the ocean search thru their office.

LegallyLex or John Silvetti himself posted at BFN to send donations to TES I believe.  I'll find the post.  I want to say it was John that posted it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 04:56:05 PM
klaas - I spoke with TES' office in March 2008 - and yes, they were still receiving donations for the ocean search thru their office.

LegallyLex or John Silvetti himself posted at BFN to send donations to TES I believe.  I'll find the post.  I want to say it was John that posted it.

FYI - it wasn't in any of John's posts that were forwarded to me (and I beleive I got them all).  So must be in one of Lex's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 04:58:53 PM
Dang, can't find that particular post now.  Here is more from BFN.  JDsurveyor1 is Silvetti:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.0

John, what can we do to insure that the search is completed?

Also, when the cage was found that was shown on Dateline (pictures also hit the internet) what thoughts, emotions, etc... went through your mind?  Can you elaborate on that for us?  Thanks!
The important thing is to raise funds.  It will require corporate support as well as private donations.  Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount.  So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world.

The media really blew the cage out of proportion.  Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat.  It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast.  My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after.  It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest.  The crew moved onto other targets.  Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found her.  I don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 24, 2009, 04:59:02 PM
AIVD remains in Aruba

AMSTERDAM - Intelligence AIVD does not Aruba. This is despite the request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber who wants all of the island AIVD'ers leave.

Writes that Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld (CDA) in a letter to the Lower House.

Bijleveld says no reason to try to meet a request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

 

Croes


The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes said the AIVD'ers to want, after an internal report of the Dutch Representation in Aruba was held.

He played it to the media, wrote Bijleveld. That he deliberately reporting the publicity has, Bijleveld called 'bad'.

Harassment

In reporting to Aruban politicians and their relatives are not spared. Thus Croes' the ramkoers-role and the electorate happy, while a nephew of Croes and the son of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber intimidate people. The Aruban Minister accused the Netherlands after the leak of intelligence reporting.

Liason


In Aruba is Bijleveld since 2006 with the Aruban government liaison work of the AIVD. This liaison officer to maintain contact with intelligence and security services in Latin America and the Caribbean, requires the Secretary of State.

The liaison is not involved in the creation of the weekly messages, one of which ended up in Croes, set Bijleveld.

Confidential

The reporting was due to 'human error' in an Aruban official right, let Bijleveld know. An official of the Ministry of Justice sent the reporting accidentally mailed to an Aruban official.

"There is no evidence that this is not done in good faith." The document was very much given that it had to be treated confidentially.

Damage


The Aruban officials played the message to Croes, while Justice officials have unsuccessfully tried to e-mail retrieval.

Bijleveld acknowledged in the letter that the relationship between the Netherlands and Aruba by reporting damage has occurred. It good to have had talks with Oduber about the incident. On this basis, they think that the relationship soon again in a calmer waters will state. "

http://www.nu.nl/algemeen/1922923/aivd-blijft-op-aruba.html

Bijleveld also writes that it is regrettable that Rudy Croes made the leaked VNO-report public.

in another letter Bijleveld writes that she is worried about corruption on Aruba and the Antilles.
this might make Oduber/Croes angry, because Brinkman is of the same opinion as Bijleveld on this, only in less diplomatic terms.

Bijleveld is trying to calm the situation before the debate next Wednesday March 4th.
interesting to see if there will be response from Aruba this week.
a response from Croes usually leads to more trouble.

http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1394062/Uitlekken+geheim+rapport+kwalijk.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 05:00:08 PM
What does this mean?

http://www.yellowpages.com/info-LMS86943925/Schaefer-Realty-Holdings-Llc?from=qpibp-mi

Schaefer Realty Holdings Llc
100 Enterprise Ave
League City, TX 77573 Map

GENERAL INFORMATION:

AKA
Legacy Offshore Llc

???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 05:11:30 PM
What does this mean?

http://www.yellowpages.com/info-LMS86943925/Schaefer-Realty-Holdings-Llc?from=qpibp-mi

Schaefer Realty Holdings Llc
100 Enterprise Ave
League City, TX 77573 Map

GENERAL INFORMATION:

AKA
Legacy Offshore Llc

???

Nevermind.

Legacy Offshore, LLC

Houston Office
100 Enterprise Ave.
League City, TX 77573
Office 281-334-2266
Fax 281-334-2206


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 05:11:35 PM
Jen - finally found it, yes it was Legallylex and not John.  These are posts from BFN:

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8380.msg328964#msg328964

I have posted a myspace bulletin as follows.  Please feel free to copy and paste it and use if for your myspace, face book etc to have people continue to forward and donate so that the water work can be completed.  When I post it, the video pops up.  However, here it won't but if you copy and paste to your myspace it should pop back up.  Thanks all!

In the search for Natalee Holloway, all the side scan sonar work is completed.  There are approximately 150 targets that have not been looked at due to lack of funding.  The Persistence and crew leave with very mixed emotions! They wanted to bring Natalee home to American soil and her family.  They will now not know if she is in the 150 targets.  Donations can be made to Texas Equusearch to finish this up at a later date.  With a new ship and ROV, and, calm weather, this may be able to be completed in 3 weeks!<br />The information for TES is listed below.  <br /><br /><br /><a href="http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=25285782">Check out this video: Persistence looking for Natalee Holloway</a><br /><br /><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="never" allowNetworking="all" height="386" width="480" data="http://lads.myspace.com/videos/vplayer.swf">
  <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="never" />
  <param name="allowNetworking" value="all" />
  <param name="movie" value="http://lads.myspace.com/videos/vplayer.swf" />
  <param name="flashvars" value="m=25285782&type=video&v=2" />
</object>..<br /><br /><a href="http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.addToProfileConfirm&videoid=25285782&title=Check out this video: Persistence looking for Natalee Holloway">Add to My Profile</a> | <a href="http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.home">More Videos</a><br /><br />Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: "Holloway search". To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html Texas EquuSearch Office: 4013 FM 517, Suite B Dickinson, Texas 77539 P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539 Office: (281) 309-9500 Fax: (281) 534-6719 Toll Free: (877) 270-9500 Email: donate@texasequusearch.org


http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8398.msg329116#msg329116


So the search is over.
So what now? And not to offend anyone, but I don't mean this is in a spiritual sense, or a "don't give up now" sense, I mean in a concrete, steps to be taken sense. What happens next with the case and with the search? Joran has not been rearrested and the search was unable to locate Natalee, so what is next?

I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence. This is no small undertaking, of course, and so far none of us are in a position to know or receive any feedback on how we are doing... are we any closer. Just a ballfield guess on my part... but I'd imagine a three-week endeavor of this sort will cost somewhere in the neighborhood of $500,000.00. Meaning... we only need one donor such as Louis Schaefer and John (with the Persistence)... or... a whole bunch of smaller ones.

Organized steps of who has contacted whom might have been an ideal approach to such a huge undertaking but my experience so far with this type group-work of anonymous members across a variety of forums is just about impossible to... orchestrate. However... if you have any ideas, steps, thoughts on it... I'm all ears... ?

Sindalle, Louis and Tim are trying to raise funds (probably as I type this) to finish out the ROV portion of looking at the targets.  No one has just stopped... They are trying to raise the funds to return to the targets.  I am sure Dave, Robin and Beth are also.  I am continuing email campaigns and mass bulletins to try to get donations sent to Texass Equusearch to finish this.  Angela has it right! We need to continue to seek donations to finish.   

I hope this helps answer some questions you may have... :)


http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8398.msg329120#msg329120

It is a shame that the ship and crew had to leave before their work was done.

There was so little time to raise funds. If only  it could have been started sooner.

I know you are saying it is not over, but  Like everyone, I wish it could have continued now

Starr, I agree.  But you remember what started out as a 22 mile grid turn into approximately 52 miles scanned.  Also, you read the updates with the bad weather the Persistence had in trying to get the data.  This slowed the progress down.  So they were definitely there longer than initially thought because of expanding the grid and the weather.  Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),  I let everyone know as soon as John heard that there was no more funding and donations were needed.  I did not know until then; and, I believe it was a day or two after that that it was on the media (Tim on Greta). 

We can only do what we can do. (Please know that no one was more saddened to leave without looking at those targets than the Persistence crew).  They did manage to get the complete side scanner survey done and have the data for the targets not looked at.  Now, it's time to get donations to complete this part.  A boat and ROV will have to go over and look at the targets.  If they do this in good weather (not the winter), they can probably complete it in about 3 weeks.   Had the Persistence stayed at this point, they probably would NOT have been able to complete the work in 3 weeks due to the severity of the weather.  It would have taken them much longer I am sure.

I am sure TES, Louis, Dave, Robin, Beth and all of us here will continue to seek donations to finish the project.
I am saddened too.... I am sure my sadness is nothing compared to that of the crew, but this is what needs to be accomplished now. 

I hope that explains it a little better.  Have a good day Starr!   



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 24, 2009, 05:13:27 PM
About Legacy Offshore

Based in Broussard, Louisiana and with a Sales and Estimating office in Houston, Texas, located at

100 Enterprise Avenue, League City, Texas 77573, Legacy Offshore is an innovative provider in the

area of subsea construction services and fabrication. Operating at depths, but not limited to, 300 feet,

our specialized personnel provide construction and inspection services to both domestic and

international markets. Legacy Offshore sustains its subsea and topside projects with an expanding fleet

of diving support vessels, experienced offshore personnel, and a project management team with a

proven track record in the Gulf of Mexico, Latin America and other foreign markets. For more

information, please visit www.legacyoffshore.com.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 05:15:11 PM
AIVD remains in Aruba

AMSTERDAM - Intelligence AIVD does not Aruba. This is despite the request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber who wants all of the island AIVD'ers leave.

Writes that Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld (CDA) in a letter to the Lower House.

Bijleveld says no reason to try to meet a request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

 

Croes


The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes said the AIVD'ers to want, after an internal report of the Dutch Representation in Aruba was held.

He played it to the media, wrote Bijleveld. That he deliberately reporting the publicity has, Bijleveld called 'bad'.

Harassment

In reporting to Aruban politicians and their relatives are not spared. Thus Croes' the ramkoers-role and the electorate happy, while a nephew of Croes and the son of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber intimidate people. The Aruban Minister accused the Netherlands after the leak of intelligence reporting.

Liason


In Aruba is Bijleveld since 2006 with the Aruban government liaison work of the AIVD. This liaison officer to maintain contact with intelligence and security services in Latin America and the Caribbean, requires the Secretary of State.

The liaison is not involved in the creation of the weekly messages, one of which ended up in Croes, set Bijleveld.

Confidential

The reporting was due to 'human error' in an Aruban official right, let Bijleveld know. An official of the Ministry of Justice sent the reporting accidentally mailed to an Aruban official.

"There is no evidence that this is not done in good faith." The document was very much given that it had to be treated confidentially.

Damage


The Aruban officials played the message to Croes, while Justice officials have unsuccessfully tried to e-mail retrieval.

Bijleveld acknowledged in the letter that the relationship between the Netherlands and Aruba by reporting damage has occurred. It good to have had talks with Oduber about the incident. On this basis, they think that the relationship soon again in a calmer waters will state. "

http://www.nu.nl/algemeen/1922923/aivd-blijft-op-aruba.html

Bijleveld also writes that it is regrettable that Rudy Croes made the leaked VNO-report public.

in another letter Bijleveld writes that she is worried about corruption on Aruba and the Antilles.
this might make Oduber/Croes angry, because Brinkman is of the same opinion as Bijleveld on this, only in less diplomatic terms.

Bijleveld is trying to calm the situation before the debate next Wednesday March 4th.
interesting to see if there will be response from Aruba this week.
a response from Croes usually leads to more trouble.

http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1394062/Uitlekken+geheim+rapport+kwalijk.html



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: That's for sure!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 24, 2009, 05:33:10 PM
AIVD remains in Aruba

AMSTERDAM - Intelligence AIVD does not Aruba. This is despite the request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber who wants all of the island AIVD'ers leave.

Writes that Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld (CDA) in a letter to the Lower House.

Bijleveld says no reason to try to meet a request of the Aruban Prime Minister Nelson Oduber.

 

Croes


The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes said the AIVD'ers to want, after an internal report of the Dutch Representation in Aruba was held.

He played it to the media, wrote Bijleveld. That he deliberately reporting the publicity has, Bijleveld called 'bad'.

Harassment

In reporting to Aruban politicians and their relatives are not spared. Thus Croes' the ramkoers-role and the electorate happy, while a nephew of Croes and the son of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber intimidate people. The Aruban Minister accused the Netherlands after the leak of intelligence reporting.

Liason


In Aruba is Bijleveld since 2006 with the Aruban government liaison work of the AIVD. This liaison officer to maintain contact with intelligence and security services in Latin America and the Caribbean, requires the Secretary of State.

The liaison is not involved in the creation of the weekly messages, one of which ended up in Croes, set Bijleveld.

Confidential

The reporting was due to 'human error' in an Aruban official right, let Bijleveld know. An official of the Ministry of Justice sent the reporting accidentally mailed to an Aruban official.

"There is no evidence that this is not done in good faith." The document was very much given that it had to be treated confidentially.

Damage


The Aruban officials played the message to Croes, while Justice officials have unsuccessfully tried to e-mail retrieval.

Bijleveld acknowledged in the letter that the relationship between the Netherlands and Aruba by reporting damage has occurred. It good to have had talks with Oduber about the incident. On this basis, they think that the relationship soon again in a calmer waters will state. "

http://www.nu.nl/algemeen/1922923/aivd-blijft-op-aruba.html

Bijleveld also writes that it is regrettable that Rudy Croes made the leaked VNO-report public.

in another letter Bijleveld writes that she is worried about corruption on Aruba and the Antilles.
this might make Oduber/Croes angry, because Brinkman is of the same opinion as Bijleveld on this, only in less diplomatic terms.

Bijleveld is trying to calm the situation before the debate next Wednesday March 4th.
interesting to see if there will be response from Aruba this week.
a response from Croes usually leads to more trouble.

http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1394062/Uitlekken+geheim+rapport+kwalijk.html



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: That's for sure!

i think Rudy is very pissed now. but maybe Oduber keeps him on a short leash.

Aruba demanded the departure of the AIVD and an apology for the VNO-report.
both Aruba didn't get.

instead Bijleveld criticizes Rudy for making the report public.
and says the AIVD won't leave.
and brings up the corruption on Aruba (to be specific, leak of transparency and integrity of the Aruban government).

so Bijleveld must have taken the VNO-report serious!!
and is siding with Brinkman (in more diplomatic terms of course).
and then she says she is calming the situation.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

so i bet Rudy is having a very hard time now keeping his mouth shut.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 06:01:55 PM
Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14



This company has two boats of the same name.Any relation?

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: vms on February 24, 2009, 06:14:45 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 24, 2009, 06:15:33 PM

Henk Kamp is a Dutch politician. Since January 1, 2009 he is Commissioner for Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba.

He was Minister of Defense from 12 December 2002 till 22 February 2007.
As part of his "farewell tour" as Minister of Defence, Henk Kamp visited the Dutch troops in Afghanistan and paid his respects to president Hamid Karzai. President Karzai awarded Henk Kamp the High State Medal of Ghazi Wazir Mohammad Akbar Khan.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Politics/Kamp_cropped.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Politics/-Kamp_rumsfeld3.jpg)

Henk Kamp said the same thing as Hero Brinkman at Dutch talkshow Pauw&Witteman, in softer terms:
(vid is in Dutch)
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDKh5iGrgiA&feature=channel_page


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 06:19:53 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.



 ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 06:23:02 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.



 ::MonkeyNoNo::



Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 06:23:07 PM
11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.



Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.
To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org


Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.
Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480


The RV Persistence to Leave Aruba
« on: March 01, 2008, 01:03:19 PM »

It is with sadness that I am reporting to everyone that the Persistence leaves Aruba tomorrow heading for home.  As you are aware, the side scan sonar search is complete.  There are many many targets for the ROV to look at.  Sadly, this will not happen with the Persistence.  The main reason is the lack of funding.  This combined with the winter rough weather makes it difficult.  John and the crew thank all of your for your help and many blessings and prayers you have provided.  Please continue these prayers until the Persistence and crew makes it back to port in New Iberia.

I don't know what to say! Everyone has tried.  I urge you to continue to try to obtain donations so that a boat and ROV can go back and dive all the targets that the Persistence has collected.  The feelings that John and the crew have are so mixed right now.  I can only imagine... In any event, please continue with trying to get donations for the finishing of this search.  I know I am... I will not give up.

Thanks everyone! You are the best!
Posted at BFN:







Re: The RV Persistence to Leave Aruba
« Reply #57 on: March 01, 2008, 07:08:56 PM »

Quote from: dssm on March 01, 2008, 06:33:50 PM
Quote from: emilyanne on March 01, 2008, 06:30:19 PM
I am going to send out a mass email right now to everyone in my address book looking for donations. By the end of the week, I should have some money gathered. Where should I send it? I will donate $300 and include it in the rest of the money I gather throughout the week. This is NOT over yet.

Texas Equusearch marked "Natalee Holloway Search"

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

you go dssm! This is what we need! Continued requests for donations!


LegallyLex
I am sure TES, Louis, Dave, Robin, Beth and all of us here will continue to seek donations to finish the project.
Posted at BFN


LegalLex posted :
« Reply #59 on: February 23, 2008, 01:34:38 PM »
Do you know if the donations received have been enough to keep the Persistence afloat  for long enough?

Kescah, the answer to that is no.  I wish it were a different answer.
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8255.45
LegallyLex


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 06:24:47 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 06:27:03 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.


We should again thank VMS for the help!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 06:27:52 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.



Keepthefaith, always 1, Kermit, casa, johan555, bastibro, Lifesong


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 06:30:34 PM
11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.
14 Feb  Kyle is in US talking to Executives
Klye said: "I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 06:31:02 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.



Keepthefaith, always 1, Kermit, casa, johan555, bastibro, Lifesong

ribbit



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 06:33:31 PM
What did Schaefer and Koch,take Superior offshore for, in terms of money?Close to 70 million dollars?????   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 06:39:30 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Spoke with Beth today. Nothing of any pressing news, we just had not chatted in a while and it was great to do some catch up with her.

However, I took the opportunity to ask Beth a couple of questions that she was kind enough to answer.

Question: Beth, this may come as a strange question but in light of some people writing misrepresentations regarding stuff that SM has done ... has Scared Monkeys on the FP or in the forum ever made comments, posts or done anything that would have upset you that you were angered or disagreed with?

Answer: Red, are you kidding. Scared Monkeys has done so much good from the beginning how could you even ask that. Are you crazy!



Kermit
"Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.
Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!"

BUMP ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bastibro on February 24, 2009, 06:46:06 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.



Keepthefaith, always 1, Kermit, casa, johan555, bastibro, Lifesong

ribbit



Speaking of drive-by`s  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 06:49:55 PM
11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.



Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.
To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org


Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.
Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480


The RV Persistence to Leave Aruba
« on: March 01, 2008, 01:03:19 PM »

It is with sadness that I am reporting to everyone that the Persistence leaves Aruba tomorrow heading for home.  As you are aware, the side scan sonar search is complete.  There are many many targets for the ROV to look at.  Sadly, this will not happen with the Persistence.  The main reason is the lack of funding.  This combined with the winter rough weather makes it difficult.  John and the crew thank all of your for your help and many blessings and prayers you have provided.  Please continue these prayers until the Persistence and crew makes it back to port in New Iberia.

I don't know what to say! Everyone has tried.  I urge you to continue to try to obtain donations so that a boat and ROV can go back and dive all the targets that the Persistence has collected.  The feelings that John and the crew have are so mixed right now.  I can only imagine... In any event, please continue with trying to get donations for the finishing of this search.  I know I am... I will not give up.

Thanks everyone! You are the best!
Posted at BFN:







Re: The RV Persistence to Leave Aruba
« Reply #57 on: March 01, 2008, 07:08:56 PM »

Quote from: dssm on March 01, 2008, 06:33:50 PM
Quote from: emilyanne on March 01, 2008, 06:30:19 PM
I am going to send out a mass email right now to everyone in my address book looking for donations. By the end of the week, I should have some money gathered. Where should I send it? I will donate $300 and include it in the rest of the money I gather throughout the week. This is NOT over yet.

Texas Equusearch marked "Natalee Holloway Search"

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

you go dssm! This is what we need! Continued requests for donations!


LegallyLex
I am sure TES, Louis, Dave, Robin, Beth and all of us here will continue to seek donations to finish the project.
Posted at BFN


LegalLex posted :
« Reply #59 on: February 23, 2008, 01:34:38 PM »
Do you know if the donations received have been enough to keep the Persistence afloat  for long enough?

Kescah, the answer to that is no.  I wish it were a different answer.
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8255.45
LegallyLex


 

http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html.....this link no longer works.
It used to give a list of all of the donors to the Natalee Holloway search...private & personal.
The donations were all listed alphabetically by first name.  I would like to see it now!!
Several businesses in Aruba were listed, as well as a $10,000 donation from AHATA.
My donation never showed up on the list of donors, even though it was deducted from
my bank account.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 06:59:44 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 07:04:02 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



I saw that earlier today when I was trying to find that list of donors.
I couldn't find much about Natalee on the new site.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 07:06:08 PM
As far as asking for last minute donations, I believe that was in March and if I'm not mistaken they asked for donations to be sent to TES (at that time).

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=7921.msg327458#msg327458

While searching I found this post of Kyles that has always bothered me.  My comments in Red:



Dateline made many grievous mistakes in the broadcast.  To name a few:
 
1) My biggest problem with it --  they failed to mention or include any interview from John Silvetti, the owner of the Persistence and field project manager of the search. He was just as influencial to the project as TM. Really?  See #5.  If it was a TES documentary then why are you mad they didn't intervew Silvetti?

2) They included a statement by Dave H. which said we could find a quarter on the seafloor with our equipment.  We do not have the ability to detect a quarter on the seafloor.  To anyone in the industry, this is silly.  BFD

3) the trap was not found where Tim Miller guessed or had a feeling it would be.

4) the broadcast gave the impression that they knew the type of trap which was allegedly stolen from the fishermen's huts.  They speculated on the missing trap using added file footage. WTF did you expect?  It's TV, they like to over dramatize.

5)  the broadcast was supposed to be a documentary on TES and Tim Miller, not the search for Natalee Holloway.  It seems they used Tim Miller to get the scoop on the search.  Now Kyle, you can't be this stupid.  You think Dateline decided to come along on the ship because they love sailing? 

I do not think you were mistaken Klaas.  I am looking.  I do believe it was a post from BFN.

Thanks for the quotes.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 07:08:08 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



I saw that earlier today when I was trying to find that list of donors.
I couldn't find much about Natalee on the new site.

I didn't either Magnolia, but I will also say when I reviewed all the recent missing persons they are searching for, it never ceases to amaze and dishearten me just how many go missing. Adults too, not just children, at a time crime is increasing due to this economy it's very concerning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 07:12:46 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.



CapsLockWizzard's  facts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 07:13:00 PM


Hey vms - THANK YOU for posting that article about Silvetti and Legacy.

Guys - check out this link, and compare it to the list of boat's owned by Superior Offshore.

See anything interesting?????????  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::

Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon   Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14
-----------------------

Boats owned by legacy:

Gulf Diver V

Gulmar Falcon


Sun River

Ocean Veritas


Here you go Jen3560

Superior Offshore International sells PSV, offers DSVFiled from Houston
4/15/2008 6:11:54 PM GMT




 
USA/GULF OF MEXICO: Financially troubled Superior Offshore International has closed the sale of platform support vessel (PSV) Gulf Diver V and selected onboard diving equipment to Legacy Offshore for US$4 million. Under the purchase agreement, Superior Offshore has the option to repurchase the vessel and equipment for the same price on Oct. 1, 2008. Legacy Offshore provided a deposit of US$1.8 million in late March, which Superior Offshore used to make a scheduled payment on the charter of the diving support vessel (DSV) Gulmar Condor, which Superior Offshore would not have been able to make without the deposit.

http://www.energycurrent.com/index.php?id=4&storyid=9981


I'm still 4 pages behind, but I cannot believe what I am reading!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 07:14:13 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



I saw that earlier today when I was trying to find that list of donors.
I couldn't find much about Natalee on the new site.

Thank you.

I have the old link somewhere.  I copied and pasted a couple pages of donors from sometime at the beginning/middle of December.  Give me a minute/a lifetime ... I may find it.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 07:15:17 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



Right but it doesn't look like it's being utilized yet nor is it really being moderated.  All good intentions I'm sure. Their new website is more like a blog set up rather than a website set up, I don't care for it but that's just me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 07:15:55 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.



CapsLockWizzard's  facts?

You think Magnolia? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 24, 2009, 07:22:25 PM
Aruba
Lethal violence in Rancho Street
24 Feb, 2009, 14:18 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - A quarrel between two persons in the Rancho Street in the night from Saturday to Sunday completely out of hand. Was allegedly the victim around four o'clock in the morning are so abused, that the victim in the hospital declared brain dead. The exact circumstances of the incident is still unclear and is examined by the police.
Earlier the same night another person reported to the police with gunshot wounds in his left arm. He stated that in the Rancho Street was shot by a HS also known as "Matador." The victim was removed by ambulance to the hospital


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 07:27:12 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.



I agree.  VMS ... you must be as frustrated as I am in regards to Kyle Kingman's own words as they relate to John Silvetti.  No speculation required.  No theorizing required.  A revelation from somebody who was there on board the Persistence in an official capacity ... somebody who observed all.

Janet

++++++


THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

John Silvetti

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
 
Kyle: I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive.  John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me.

Kyle: Mr. Red Shirt came on the Persistence along with Dolf, Mos, et al for the meeting on the 30th."

Kyle:   This is certainly NOT John Silvetti. I do not know this man. He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Fabric - Tarp - Vertibre - Skull

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: In my opinion that last pic from Jan 7th should be absolutely intriguing and flip your mind from what you thought you knew. In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric.

Kyle: Notice the blue fabric swayed in the current.

Kyle: The blue tarp piece was found approx 6-10 ft away from the trap opening.

Kyle:  The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle: The most likely to remain at or near it's original location was the skull, which is why I was so convinced the object pictured was a skull.

Kyle:   … John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand

Kyle:  I'm sorry if this is disturbing. I took the picture of Natalee standing on the beach and cropped, rotated, and scaled the image to correlate with the trap body form.  Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand.

Kyle: The bag that is above the denim bag looks to me as though it contains pieces of  vertebrae.

Kyle: The fabric(s?) are not visible on either the Dec 29th or 30th dives. There is about an inch of sand over the fabrics. The fabrics are completely covered. The diver sampled the sand and found the fabric underneath the sand. He then bagged the blue fabric. If the other bag contains fabric, it was also in the sand. There was also something possibly recovered from far inside the trap. In the video the diver is inside the trap with just below his knees showing. I don't know what was sampled far inside the trap if anything.

Kyle:  The contents of the trap were being actively investigated. The forensic results of a fabric sample showed the fabric sample was not a match to Natalee's blouse and that no DNA match to Natalee was found within that fabric sample. Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

Kyle:  In my opinion, the blue fabric is quite possibly Natalee's skirt. The divers found the denim where I suggested a week earlier (Dec 29th) to Tim Miller that there was likely Natalee's denim skirt under the sand.  Also in my opinion, the deni-like fabric is a match in terms of color, quantity, and structure to Natalee's skirt. It's not a lot of denim folded in the bag, but then again her skirt was rather small.

Kyle: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains.

Kyle:  … Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.
 
Kyle: The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle: In my opinion that last pic from Jan 7th should be absolutely intriguing and flip your mind from what you thought you knew.  In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric.
 
 
Kyle Kingman’s Summary

Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: bc73 on February 24, 2009, 07:27:14 PM
I know most readers and posters have already watched "Final Hours of Natalee Holloway", but it is on at 8pm tonight on E!. I just consider it a refresher course to get pissed off at Aruba, and the BS that those animals have caused the family to suffer through.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 07:31:38 PM
Magnolia,

Quote
http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html.....this link no longer works.
It used to give a list of all of the donors to the Natalee Holloway search...private & personal.
The donations were all listed alphabetically by first name.  I would like to see it now!!
Several businesses in Aruba were listed, as well as a $10,000 donation from AHATA.
My donation never showed up on the list of donors, even though it was deducted from
my bank account.

I noticed this and posted about it a while back.  It still seems the sponsor page is under construction, but I have noticed that they highlight specific sponsors on the right side toward the bottom of the page.  I remember the list you are talking about.

Having had sponsors for a scholarship fundraiser we've had here for 10 years, it's common to use the sponsor's businesses or promote them as best we can.  The fact that TES calls upon Stilletti, or Legacy is not unusual or a surprise to me.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 07:33:10 PM
Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14



This company has two boats of the same name.Any relation?

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/


Take a look at their references,as well as who their clients are!VERY INTERESTING....

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 07:35:11 PM
Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14



This company has two boats of the same name.Any relation?

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/


Take a look at their references,as well as who their clients are!VERY INTERESTING....

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/

Been looking for anything on the companies that each own 33.33% of Gulmar offhsore but am having no luck!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 07:38:09 PM
XVII. Support the Effort

Fri 15-Feb 1100 hrs

Special Notice:


<snipped>

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: "Holloway search".


To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/02/support-effort.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 07:40:53 PM


I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.


VMS ... I know you have.  This is why I fail to comprehend why you are there and not here.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 07:42:27 PM
You don't get a class action lawsuit filed against you for philanthropic endeavors.

Just saying. . . . . .


No, you sure don't!  What these people claim was done to them does seem supported by the facts and times of sale of those with insider information.


I'm still back here getting caught up, but wanted to mention that its not only the class action lawsuits by the shareholders they screwed over - they are under investigation by the SEC for Insider Trading/Securities Fraud.  That's the big deal.  (Think Martha Stewart)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 07:46:38 PM
I know most readers and posters have already watched "Final Hours of Natalee Holloway", but it is on at 8pm tonight on E!. I just consider it a refresher course to get pissed off at Aruba, and the BS that those animals have caused the family to suffer through.

Thanks for the reminder BC


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 07:46:57 PM
Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14



This company has two boats of the same name.Any relation?

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/


Take a look at their references,as well as who their clients are!VERY INTERESTING....

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/

Patrice Chemin, who is expected to become our Chief Operating Officer in May 2007, is the president and sole shareholder of Carmel Contracting Company, Inc., the company that acted as a commercial agent in connection with our charters of the Gulmar Falcon in April 2006 and the Gulmar Condor in October 2006, for which Carmel received a commission 2006 in the amount of $395,818 from Gulmar Offshore with respect to the Gulmar Falcon . Carmel did not receive a commission 2006 from Gulmar Offshore in connection with our charter of the Gulmar Condor . Carmel will receive future commissions from Gulmar Offshore of 2.5% and


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 07:48:40 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



Right but it doesn't look like it's being utilized yet nor is it really being moderated.  All good intentions I'm sure. Their new website is more like a blog set up rather than a website set up, I don't care for it but that's just me.

I am having difficulty locating info on the Natalee Holloway searches including the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

++++++

Texas Equusearch Website

TEXAS EQUUSEARCH
MOUNTED SEARCH AND RECOVERY TEAM


http://texasequusearch.org/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: sandy leiva on February 24, 2009, 08:02:02 PM
Looks like Tim and Equusearch have a forum now? That link is at the top toolbar on their website now.

http://texasequusearch.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=2&sid=2fda8e2c3faef2751d36b6029a32d6f5



Right but it doesn't look like it's being utilized yet nor is it really being moderated.  All good intentions I'm sure. Their new website is more like a blog set up rather than a website set up, I don't care for it but that's just me.

I am having difficulty locating info on the Natalee Holloway searches including the Persistence undertaking.

Janet

++++++

Texas Equusearch Website

TEXAS EQUUSEARCH
MOUNTED SEARCH AND RECOVERY TEAM


http://texasequusearch.org/


on satelite tv the final hours of Natalee holloway   here its channel 236.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:06:51 PM
Thank you.  I have scanned the guide and ... nothing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
5:00 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 08:15:11 PM
Boats owned by Superior Offshore:

Superior Endeavour Vanuatu Own 2004 (2) 10/2004 265 8,600 61 Yes(3) 50
Gulmar Falcon Panama Charter(4) 2006 04/2006 220 9,235 73 Yes(3) 30
Gulmar Condor Marshall Charter(5) 2006 07/2007 341 10,764 128 Yes(3) 120/70
Islands
Adams Surveyor Bahrain Charter(6) 2007 03/2007 228 5,084 54 No(7) 45
Toisa Puma Liberia Charter( 2007 - 253 4,672 60 Yes(3) 25
Seamec III India Charter(9) 2007 07/2007 304 5,124 90 Yes(3) 50/10
Four-Point Vessels:
Gulf Diver III U.S. Own 2003 09/2003 165 1,034 36 No 10
Gulf Diver IV (10) U.S. Own 2005 - 168 2,880 43 No 15
Gulf Diver V U.S. Own 2005 03/2006 180 3,330 23 No 15
Gulf Diver VI U.S. Own 2006 09/2006 166 2,890 38 No 15
----------

Boats in Trinidad as of November 2007:

Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14



This company has two boats of the same name.Any relation?

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/


Take a look at their references,as well as who their clients are!VERY INTERESTING....

http://www.gulmaroffshore.com/

(http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/5530/gulmaroffshore.jpg)


we know Kyle is working for Statoil Hydro,AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway

Ormen Lange Excavation - North SeaOrmen Lange deep sea pipeline excavation monitoring with Oceaneering Magnum ROV and high-resolution multibeam sonar. StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:43 PMhttp://geosolutions.blogspot.com/2008/07/ormen-lange-excavation-north-sea-norway.html




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.


Thank you, vms!  I am grateful you shared the information regarding Tim & Silvetti with us  - whatever the truth is - we all want to know.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 08:18:36 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.



Keepthefaith, always 1, Kermit, casa, johan555, bastibro, Lifesong

ribbit



Speaking of drive-by`s  ::MonkeyHaHa::

baaa, baaa black sheep have you any wool?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 08:22:56 PM
11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.
14 Feb  Kyle is in US talking to Executives
Klye said: "I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already


I hope you've got that pie in the oven, Janet!   ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Best frog.

Ever.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 24, 2009, 08:25:23 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.


Thank you, vms!  I am grateful you shared the information regarding Tim & Silvetti with us  - whatever the truth is - we all want to know.


What was the info. shared about Silvetti and Tim? --I missed it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: always 1 on February 24, 2009, 08:27:00 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.



Keepthefaith, always 1, Kermit, casa, johan555, bastibro, Lifesong

ribbit



Speaking of drive-by`s  ::MonkeyHaHa::

baaa, baaa black sheep have you any wool?


      ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 08:27:56 PM
I know most readers and posters have already watched "Final Hours of Natalee Holloway", but it is on at 8pm tonight on E!. I just consider it a refresher course to get pissed off at Aruba, and the BS that those animals have caused the family to suffer through.

Thanks for the reminder BC

thanks BC, I am putting it on TiVO this time.

Just at the part where Joran states "she will never be found" and "the ocean is big".

he's a sociopathic beast


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 08:28:00 PM
Thanx again VMS! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think I finally get it.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

VMS provided some good information.Unintentionally i believe? ::MonkeyWink::

I prefer to stay away from speculation, hearsay, and opinion. I would rather deal with facts, wherever they may lead.  I have been praying for justice for Natalee since June of 2005. Do not make assumptions about me or what my intentions are, Keepthefaith.


Thank you, vms!  I am grateful you shared the information regarding Tim & Silvetti with us  - whatever the truth is - we all want to know.


What was the info. shared about Silvetti and Tim? --I missed it.

I believe the link was a few pages back regarding searches in Texas Wreck.A kayaker or something!But amidst all that it had the information regarding Legacy offshore!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:28:09 PM
Equusearch seems to have no problems working with the Silvetti Group.



Search for Missing Kayaker - Dr. Stephen Zella, in Seabrook, TX - TES needs searchers
Posted on 22. Feb, 2009 by B Tarr in Active Cases, Featured Articles, Missing Persons

02/23/09- Monday, Feb 23, 2009 - 6:30pm  The search for Dr Zella will continue tomorrow morning at Clear Lake Park.  We are still in need of boats, kayaks, jet skis and waverunners, in addition to people to act as observers on the boats.  All volunteers should report to the Command Center at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway at 8:00 am.

At this time, five boats have been deployed into Clear Lake using side scan sonar and other advanced technology to locate Stephen. Many of the boats and the dive teams will continue to work throughout the night.  At this point, Dr Zella has not yet been found, but our hopes are not dimmed that he will be found soon.  Our prayers, our thoughts, and our continued commitment remain with Dr Zella and his loving family and friends.

02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 4:15pm We have been asked to post the following message from the children of Dr. Stephen Zella:

We need volunteers to help in the fight to find my daddy. I love him so much.   If you can help the volunteers with a boat or kayak, please help them.
We have not stopped the search.
Lovingly,
Remington Zella, age 11 and Maxwell Zella, age 8


02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 1:45pm update: Multiple volunteers with boats and kayaks have shown up today to assist in the search for Stephen Zella. The kayaks are able to get into areas where the larger boats are unable to search, ensuring that we are able to do a thorough search of the area. Although high winds are making the search more difficult today, conditions have not stopped the volunteers in their effort to find Stephen. The search is still ongoing.

We continue to receive calls of concern and care from friends, neighbors,classmates and associates of Stephen and his family. The support shown by the community and friends has been outstanding, and we wish to extend our deepest thanks. Please, continue to keep Stephen and his family in your thoughts and prayers.

02/23/09 - Monday, Feb 23, 2009 Texas EquuSearch is in need of boats, kayaks, jet skis and wave runners to assist in today’s search for Dr. Zella, along with people to act as observers in the boats.  The Command Center is still located at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.

Last night, sonar equipment and divers worked late into the night in their efforts to find Dr. Zella. Our efforts will continue today with sonar teams scouring the bay area, Clear Lake and inlet streams.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 10:15 pm, Texas EquuSearch has been joined in the search for Dr. Zella by the Silvetti Group and Legacy Offshore Divers & Construction Company, both out of Louisiana. We will continue searching tonight, as long as possible.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 7:45pm,  Dr. Stephen Zella has not been located.  Texas EquuSearch will resume the search on Monday at 8:00am. We are asking for volunteers with shallow water boats, kayaks and jet-skis, along with foot searchers. The Command Center will remain at the boat launch at Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway.  Search Coordinator Frank Black can be reached at 713-301-6813.

Although we have not yet found Dr. Zella, our hopes remain high that our search will be successful. We would like to extend our deepest thanks to the surrounding community, citizens and businesses alike, for their outstanding support and to local law enforcement for their tireless efforts and cooperation.

Please, continue to keep Dr. Zella and his loving family, friends and associates in your hearts and in your prayers.

02/22/09 - Sunday, Feb 22, 2009 - As of 11:45 am, CST, multiple volunteers with Texas EquuSearch are on the scene searching for Dr. Stephen Zella.  Member Ted Miller is on scene with his personal helicopter to provide search assistance, along with multiple boats, other watercraft and foot searchers.  At this time, we have not yet found Dr. Zella, but we remain hopeful that today’s search will be successful.  We continue to keep the family in our prayers.

02/21/09 -Saturday evening update - Members of Texas EquuSearch spent the day searching for a missing kayaker on Clear Lake Saturday.  The missing man has been identified as well loved Dr. Stephen Zella, a 38 year old resident of the Clear Lake area.  Although we have not yet found Stephen, we plan on resuming a full-scale search on Sunday and our hopes are high that we will locate him and return him to his loving family.

Searchers are needed to assist in the search.  We are in need of searchers with jet-skis, kayaks and shallow water boats, in addition to foot searchers.  If you are able to assist, please come to the Command Center, located at the boat launch in Clear Lake Park, 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.   The search will resume at 8:00 am.  The Search Coordinator is Frank Black, who can be reached at 713-301-6813.  Please see the link below for a map to the Command Center.

We ask that you continue to hold Stephen Zella, his loving family and friends close to your heart and in your prayers during this most difficult of times.

02/21/09 - Saturday, Feb. 21, 2009 - Texas EquuSearch is searching for a kayaker missing in Clear Lake Park this morning.  TES responded to a call for assistance from the Harris County Constable to assist in the search.  We are in dire need of shallow water boats, jet skis and foot searchers.  If you are able to assist, please report to the Command Center at Clear Lake Park, located at 5001 NASA Parkway, Seabrook, Texas.  The Search Coordinator is Frank Black, and he can be reached at 713-301-6813.

http://texasequusearch.org/2009/02/search-for-missing-kayaker-in-seabrook-tx-tes-needs-searchers/


********************


Search team hopes they are close to finding missing kayaker

Bay Area Citizen
By DANA GUTHRIE
Updated: 02.24.09
Even more boats and volunteers arrived at Clear Lake Park in Seabrook Tuesday morning to aid in the search for Dr. Stephen Zella, who disappeared from his kayak on Friday near the NASA Parkway bridge.

"I think we're close, I really do," said Frank Black, search coordinator for Equusearch, which has been on the scene since Saturday. "I hope we'll have something positive today."

On Monday, a note was posted on the Equusearch website from Zella's children, 11-year-old daughter Remington and 8-year-old son Maxwell.


"We need volunteers to help in the fight to find my daddy. I love him so much.   If you can help the volunteers with a boat or kayak, please help them. We have not stopped the search."


The community response during the search for Zella has been “phenomenal,” Black said Monday afternoon at about 4 p.m.

“We’re determined to find him now."

Most of the day Monday, high winds stirred up the waters near the Clear Lake Park boat ramp, where Zella, 38, disappeared early Friday afternoon, leaving only his kayak, fishing equipment and bait behind.

Friends and family members from across the country are paying close attention to the search for the Nassau Bay psychiatrist, who worked for The Watershed, a drug and alcohol counseling group in Webster, until it shut down about a month ago.

On Monday, five different groups were using sonar equipment to scan the bottom of Clear Lake — League City, Nassau Bay, the Montgomery County Constable’s office and The Silvetti Group and Legacy Offshore Divers & Construction Co., both of Louisiana, Black said. Equusearch said the sonar teams and divers will work through most of Monday night.

“The winds have not let up on us to allow us to do anything much until now,” Black said Monday afternoon.

The search will continue on Tuesday beginning at 8 a.m. Volunteers are needed and encouraged to visit the command center located at the Clear Lake Park boat ramp on NASA Parkway in Seabrook.

At about 10:15 p.m. Sunday, the search team was joined by The Silvetti Group and Legacy arrived with divers, who began searching shortly thereafter and continued diving until about 5 a.m. Monday.

The divers got a little rest on Monday morning before starting up again, Black said.

He added that numerous boaters, jet-skiers and kayakers, which can get into smaller spaces and shallows, came out all day Monday to assist with the search.

Black said that after scanning the lake bottom with sonar, divers must determine whether what they found is debris.

“We’re in a process of elimination right now,” he said.

The lake bed is covered with both concrete used to break up waves coming in from Galveston Bay, and debris from Hurricane Ike, all of which makes searching difficult.

“There’s so much debris and stuff out here it’s just really slow traveling right now,” Black said, adding that the group will continue its search until Zella is found or until the Harris County Constable Precinct 8, which is leading the search, calls it off.

Seen struggling

Zella apparently fell out of a kayak on Clear Lake near Clear Lake Park off Nasa Parkway about 12:30 p.m. Friday.

Witnesses had seen Zella, who had apparently been fishing near the NASA Parkway bridge, struggling with his kayak in the water on Friday and attempted to rescue him but were unsuccessful.

All day Friday, Saturday and Sunday, Coast Guard and Equusearch helicopters and police and fire rescue boats from Webster, Nassau Bay, Seabrook, Harris County constable and sheriff and Kemah scoured the area just south of the Nasa Parkway bridge between the boat ramp at Clear Lake Park and the Hilton Hotel.

Rescue attempt

Jason McPeak of Webster said he was sitting near his kayak, ready to eat lunch, when two acquaintances ran up and told him a man was struggling in his kayak in the water.

McPeak jumped in his own kayak and headed out toward Zella, but by the time he got there, the kayaker had disappeared.

The kayak had flipped over and and when McPeak turned it over, it was full of water. Fishing equipment and baggies with bait were in the kayak, he said.

Those who saw the Zella struggling said he was not wearing a life jacket and that he apparently was alone.

McPeak said the Zella’s kayak was small compared to his own. “I’ve got a small one but I wouldn’t take it out where he was trying to fish,’’ he said, explaining that the water was rough. “I got water in my kayak when I was trying to get out to him.’’

He estimated the water was about 12 to 14 feet deep where Zella disappeared.

Compliments for police

Black said he was pleased with the level of cooperation between all of the police agencies in the Bay Area, especially the Harris County Constable’s Preceinct 8 office, which controls the scene of the incident and the search.

“I couldn’t ask for no better,” Black said of Precinct 8.

“They bend over backwards any way they can.”

He added that he noticed the search effort was well-organized from the minute Equusearch was called in.

“Everybody just started working together, and I was impressed.”


http://www.hcnonline.com/articles/2009/02/24/bay_area_citizen/news/2kayak26.txt

BUMPED


TIM MILLER AND JOHN SILVETTI


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:39:25 PM
Wreck, Keepthefaith, Lifesong, ospainter, Lady Devon, nonesuche, MuffyBee, BUCKSHOT, SuzieQ or bc73 ...

Your turn.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 08:42:32 PM
Wreck, Keepthefaith, Lifesong, ospainter, Lady Devon, nonesuche, MuffyBee, BUCKSHOT, SuzieQ or bc73 ...

Your turn.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

Not it.Wreck??

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 24, 2009, 08:42:47 PM
I know most readers and posters have already watched "Final Hours of Natalee Holloway", but it is on at 8pm tonight on E!. I just consider it a refresher course to get pissed off at Aruba, and the BS that those animals have caused the family to suffer through.

During the special, a couple things popped out at me:
(1) Paulus in casino. Instead of still photos, 2-3 second clip during E! special. The way the person's body moved solidified to me that it was indeed Paulus at that table. I have thought it before, but this confirmed it as certainty for me.
(2) Patrick, if not in on it, played the role of his life during this ordeal by selling the hell out of this story. No doubt, he cashed in on the situation.  Sensationalized big time. Crocodile tears and the whole nine yards.
(3) Not saying this is true, but based off of everything else that has been calculated and concocted by Aruba in its attempt to cover and control damage, it would not surprise me one bit if this whole scenario was concocted, MINUS THE PARTICIPATION OF PETER DEVRIES HIMSELF. Peter would not have been in on this, but possibly sold a bill of goods by an agenda.
(4) It is only logical that Joran called his father.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:43:25 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 24, 2009, 08:45:18 PM
Wreck, Keepthefaith, Lifesong, ospainter, Lady Devon, nonesuche, MuffyBee, BUCKSHOT, SuzieQ or bc73 ...

Your turn.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet
I have no doubt that the Silvetti group is now helping/assisting Tim. The question for me is "Why"? (since Silvetti is the one to Kick Tim off the Persistence on Dec. 30th)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:46:16 PM
I know most readers and posters have already watched "Final Hours of Natalee Holloway", but it is on at 8pm tonight on E!. I just consider it a refresher course to get pissed off at Aruba, and the BS that those animals have caused the family to suffer through.

During the special, a couple things popped out at me:
(1) Paulus in casino. Instead of still photos, 2-3 second clip during E! special. The way the person's body moved solidified to me that it was indeed Paulus at that table. I have thought it before, but this confirmed it as certainty for me.
(2) Patrick, if not in on it, played the role of his life during this ordeal by selling the hell out of this story. No doubt, he cashed in on the situation.  Sensationalized big time. Crocodile tears and the whole nine yards.
(3) Not saying this is true, but based off of everything else that has been calculated and concocted by Aruba in its attempt to cover and control damage, it would not surprise me one bit if this whole scenario was concocted, MINUS THE PARTICIPATION OF PETER DEVRIES HIMSELF. Peter would not have been in on this, but possibly sold a bill of goods by an agenda.
(4) It is only logical that Joran called his father.


 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 08:48:57 PM

I'm all caught up. 

KTF - You Are The Man! Great work!

I off to start following the links, but before I do I just wanted to say that....

I hope Tim Trahan is nowhere near any other searches for any other missing people, as based on his performance on December 30, 2007 in the ocean off the coast of Aruba it is my opinion that he must be the absolute worst diver anywhere, ever.


In this (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282) SM open forum post Kyle Kingman states: (http://geosolutions.blogspot.com)
To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.  The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 08:49:18 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Janet.If you make me have to deal with the paparazzi i will be very upset! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:52:30 PM
Wreck, Keepthefaith, Lifesong, ospainter, Lady Devon, nonesuche, MuffyBee, BUCKSHOT, SuzieQ or bc73 ...

Your turn.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet
I have no doubt that the Silvetti group is now helping/assisting Tim. The question for me is "Why"? (since Silvetti is the one to Kick Tim off the Persistence on Dec. 30th)

Obviously ... John Silvetti is providing Tim Miller (TES) with a lot of crucial resources.  Hey ... it gives me lump in my thoart and ... tears well up just going there.

I am going to write Tim Miller a letter from the heart with my concerns ... my frustrations regarding his ongoing relationship with John Silvetti.  I want to know why he did not write John Silvetti off when Kyle Kingman's words exposed the betrayal of all betrayals.

I will do this in the morning following a good night sleep.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 24, 2009, 08:53:10 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Janet.If you make me have to deal with the paparazzi i will be very upset! ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 08:53:50 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Janet.If you make me have to deal with the paparazzi i will be very upset! ::MonkeyTongue::

:smt058

Pleeeeeease.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 08:54:53 PM

I'm all caught up. 

KTF - You Are The Man! Great work!

I off to start following the links, but before I do I just wanted to say that....

I hope Tim Trahan is nowhere near any other searches for any other missing people, as based on his performance on December 30, 2007 in the ocean off the coast of Aruba it is my opinion that he must be the absolute worst diver anywhere, ever.


In this (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282) SM open forum post Kyle Kingman states: (http://geosolutions.blogspot.com)
To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.  The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up.




We must give Kudos to VMS first and formost.He/she brought the link over which Jen3560 focused in on Legacy Offshore,which in turn i looked up..If the plaintiffs attorney's,as well as the SEC have this information.Schaefer and his boys better be going back offshore soon unless they've already got everything registered (offshore) and money stashed away (offshore)!JMOO

Let's see where the timeline takes us LifeSong.Wherever the TRUTH takes us! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 08:56:13 PM
Very interesting pattern's ehh Kermit?Legacy offshore.Another interesting one.ehhh Kermit?

Yes. I've been reading back. Great work Monkeys.



Keepthefaith, always 1, Kermit, casa, johan555, bastibro, Lifesong

ribbit



Speaking of drive-by`s  ::MonkeyHaHa::

baaa, baaa black sheep have you any wool?



I have goat wool. ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 08:56:32 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Janet.If you make me have to deal with the paparazzi i will be very upset! ::MonkeyTongue::

:smt058

Pleeeeeease.



Here they come Janet! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on February 24, 2009, 08:59:43 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Someone say "buzzing?"  (http://bestsmileys.com/insects/4.gif)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:02:15 PM

I'm all caught up. 

KTF - You Are The Man! Great work!

I off to start following the links, but before I do I just wanted to say that....

I hope Tim Trahan is nowhere near any other searches for any other missing people, as based on his performance on December 30, 2007 in the ocean off the coast of Aruba it is my opinion that he must be the absolute worst diver anywhere, ever.


In this (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282) SM open forum post Kyle Kingman states: (http://geosolutions.blogspot.com)
To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.  The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up.




The following is  my post from yesterday that pertains to the thumbs up/thumbs down topic.

Janet

++++++

Kyle Kingman does not clarify anything in the following post.  If visibility prevented divers/Tim Trahan from conclusively determining the contents of the trap/cage ... why was Tim Miller put in the position of informing the family of Natalee Holloway that there was NOTHING case related in the cage/trap?

Logic dictates that Dave and Beth would have been informed that another dive would be necessary to conclusively determine if the contents of the cage/trap was related to their precious daughter.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!


Sir Walter Scott, Marmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.
Scottish author & novelist (1771 - 1832)


Janet
__________


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #284 on: March 03, 2008, 11:34:25 PM »


To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.

-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...

What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.

The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


+++++++++


The Search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Chris Hansen: That had to be a crushing blow.

Tim Miller: It was a crushing blow.

Now Tim Miller had to deliver that same crushing blow to Natalee’s parents.

Chris Hansen: How hard is it for you to dial their numbers and tell them that this in fact is not the break in the case we-- we hoped for?

Tim Miller: Probably one of the hardest calls I ever made. Probably one of the hardest … probably should have never made the first one. But everything looked right at the time.

Natalee’s father was at home in Mississippi when the call came.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

Chris Hansen: You didn't know these folks before this happened. What do they represent to you now?

Dave Holloway: They represent heroes to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:03:35 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Someone say "buzzing?"  (http://bestsmileys.com/insects/4.gif)



 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 09:12:46 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Another lawsuit in the making.

Janet

Where I come from we say "I wouldn't spit on him if he was on fire". lol   

I say........bring it.

Howdy monkeys.  Of course I'm way behind as usual.  haha


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 09:16:29 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet

Janet.If you make me have to deal with the paparazzi i will be very upset! ::MonkeyTongue::

:smt058

Pleeeeeease.



 ::MonkeyEek::

OMG - stop it!  Stop it right now!

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 09:16:29 PM


EXACTLY!!!

Somewhere along the way justice for Natalee Holloway took a backseat for some Monkeys  and ... upholding John Silvetti in his betrayal to Natalee's family was where it was at.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Sadly - that goal also took a back seat for a couple of Natalee's Freebirds - but it was in favor of Kyle, not Silvetti.

This stance was taken in the face of Beth requesting us to publish this information, no less.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My heart was broken by some I had come to love and trust as though they were my own family.

It has been heartbreaking Jen, but you and all the Freebirds who were not swayed should stand tall.  You have been an amazing group of justice seekers just as the monkeys have been.  God Bless you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:17:23 PM
I know most readers and posters have already watched "Final Hours of Natalee Holloway", but it is on at 8pm tonight on E!. I just consider it a refresher course to get pissed off at Aruba, and the BS that those animals have caused the family to suffer through.

During the special, a couple things popped out at me:
(1) Paulus in casino. Instead of still photos, 2-3 second clip during E! special. The way the person's body moved solidified to me that it was indeed Paulus at that table. I have thought it before, but this confirmed it as certainty for me.
(2) Patrick, if not in on it, played the role of his life during this ordeal by selling the hell out of this story. No doubt, he cashed in on the situation.  Sensationalized big time. Crocodile tears and the whole nine yards.
(3) Not saying this is true, but based off of everything else that has been calculated and concocted by Aruba in its attempt to cover and control damage, it would not surprise me one bit if this whole scenario was concocted, MINUS THE PARTICIPATION OF PETER DEVRIES HIMSELF. Peter would not have been in on this, but possibly sold a bill of goods by an agenda.
(4) It is only logical that Joran called his father.


Klaas has an excellent image that reveals the top of the "gentleman" head at the Black Jack table and ... a comparison photo.  These two photos leave no doubt.

Karin Janssen should have been able to confiscate the entire security video tape from the evening of May 29, 2005.

Janet

++++++++


THE CASINO VIDEO

Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
December 14, 2006


PRETZER: When you look at this case, a question keeps coming up. I am looking at the picture on my PC. It is the alleged picture of a person in the casino with Natalee that looks a lot like Paul. Has there been any update on this issue?

MANSUR: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2006/12/14/the-dana-pretzer-show-december-14th-2006-jossy-mansur/


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for Sept. 19th
updated 6:33 a.m. PT, Tues., Sept. 20, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY‘S MOTHER: ... I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9407728/


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for April 3
updated 8:24 a.m. PT, Tues., April. 4, 2006


COSBY … John, first of all, is there a possibility that Paulus might have been talking to Natalee the night that she disappeared?

JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times.

COSBY: And did he ever say that he had talked to Natalee or not before?

KELLY: No, it’s never even been addressed before whether or not that’s Paulus in the videotape there sitting next to her. And it certainly appears to be to me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12150698/

 
THE LINEUP
June 9, 2006


KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE:  .... As for Paulus, sources say he is the person next to Natalee in the casino.


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement
July 12, 2005


After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


Aruban casino boss had ties to Chicago mob
Thursday, February 23, 2006 | 6:07 PM
Missing Alabama teen last seen at casino
By Chuck Goudie


Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.

Posner says he has paid the expenses for private investigators to come here and assist in the search for Holloway and according to his lawyer: "He has nothin' to do with nothing" in the murder case.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=investigative&id=3936339


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:22:56 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Another lawsuit in the making.

Janet

Where I come from we say "I wouldn't spit on him if he was on fire". lol   

I say........bring it.

Howdy monkeys.  Of course I'm way behind as usual.  haha

Well ... if you would not spend so much time star gazing ... looking out for UFOs ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 09:24:39 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0



Janet,
I would spit on him too. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Another lawsuit in the making.

Janet

Where I come from we say "I wouldn't spit on him if he was on fire". lol   

I say........bring it.

Howdy monkeys.  Of course I'm way behind as usual.  haha

Well ... if you would not spend so much time star gazing ... looking out for UFOs ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Snoopy should be thankful that Wreck jumped up into the sky and blocked that meteor with his head! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:31:18 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: always 1 on February 24, 2009, 09:33:42 PM
Hi KaaaTeeeF

:smt058

Now if that does not get the forum buzzing ... nothing will.

Janet
Bow Chicka Wow Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:33:44 PM
Hi Snoopy.

How is the real "Snoopy" doing?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 09:35:47 PM
Lifesong,

If you were asking for our opinion of Mos & Richardson, I would have to say that I do not trust either one, but that is because of all that we've seen happen and not happen over the past almost 4 years. 

That said, having had a chief and detective in the family, I know that there are power struggles at times when departments have to work with the prosecutor's office.  Each takes pride in their work, and I'm certain ego comes into play, as well.   It should be a coordinated effort. 

In Aruba, with the judicial system we can't possibly understand,  my take is the prosecutor's office called the shots.  Right there is a setting that might undermine the self-proclaimed talents of the chief and his underlings, which might produce statements contradicting the stance of prosecutor.   jmo


Thanks 2NJ, that makes a lot of sense. 

I guess my initial impression was that the prosecutor's office can only work with the evidence and statements taken by ALE...so if Van der Straaten initiated the cover-up and the police force under him followed his lead ala Dennis Jacobs' incredibly incompetent questioning, then at the end of the day the prosecutor has nothing.

I think they are both corrupt.  However, iirc Richardson's wife was van der Straaten's secretary.  Also, if I've been following ceasu's posts correctly, Mos may have been ratting out ole' Rudy's corruption regime to the homeland in that VNO report & it got him sent home early...

Then again - it's always possible I've misunderstood everything.

Except that Tim Trahan, in my opinion, should never be hired to dive anywhere for anything.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 09:40:41 PM
You Guyyyyyyys.  Stop!!  lol    
::MonkeyWaa::   ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyTongue::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyWink::

Snoopy seems to be doing fine.  Son has a new puppy, and that has been very good for the old boy. Thanks for asking Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 09:41:22 PM
Transaction
& Date Reported
Date Company Symbol Insider
Relationship Shares
Traded Average
Price Total
Amount Shares
Ownership Filing
2007-04-25
Sale 2007-04-27
2:42 pm Superior Offshore International Inc. DEEP Schaefer Louis E Jr
(Chairman
Director
10% owner) 3,025,000 $15 $45,375,000 2,409,167
(Direct
Indirect) View
2007-04-25
Sale 2007-04-27
2:42 pm Superior Offshore International Inc. DEEP Schaefer Holdings, LP
Schaefer Holdings GP, LLC
(10% owner) 1,300,000 $15 $19,500,000 2,409,167
(Direct) View
2007-04-25
Sale 2007-04-27
2:42 pm Superior Offshore International Inc. DEEP Koch R Joshua Jr
(Sr VP, Counsel & Secretary
Director
10% owner) 1,300,000 $15 $19,500,000 2,409,167
(Indirect) View


http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1372326-2.htm


If you look at these figures.How much did Schaefer walk away with??





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:46:42 PM
Lifesong,

If you were asking for our opinion of Mos & Richardson, I would have to say that I do not trust either one, but that is because of all that we've seen happen and not happen over the past almost 4 years. 

That said, having had a chief and detective in the family, I know that there are power struggles at times when departments have to work with the prosecutor's office.  Each takes pride in their work, and I'm certain ego comes into play, as well.   It should be a coordinated effort. 

In Aruba, with the judicial system we can't possibly understand,  my take is the prosecutor's office called the shots.  Right there is a setting that might undermine the self-proclaimed talents of the chief and his underlings, which might produce statements contradicting the stance of prosecutor.   jmo


Thanks 2NJ, that makes a lot of sense. 

I guess my initial impression was that the prosecutor's office can only work with the evidence and statements taken by ALE...so if Van der Straaten initiated the cover-up and the police force under him followed his lead ala Dennis Jacobs' incredibly incompetent questioning, then at the end of the day the prosecutor has nothing.

I think they are both corrupt.  However, iirc Richardson's wife was van der Straaten's secretary.  Also, if I've been following ceasu's posts correctly, Mos may have been ratting out ole' Rudy's corruption regime to the homeland in that VNO report & it got him sent home early...

Then again - it's always possible I've misunderstood everything.

Except that Tim Trahan, in my opinion, should never be hired to dive anywhere for anything.



Lifesong

I am amazed at you comprehension of the dynamics encompassing the characters who have played roles in the various aspects that encompass the coverup in the Natalee Holloway case.

You remind me of a couple of Beagles that were a part of our family years ago.  Those two little "bloodhounds" would follow a scent until the whiskers around those noses were nothing but stubble.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:48:44 PM
You Guyyyyyyys.  Stop!!  lol    
::MonkeyWaa::   ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyTongue::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyWink::

Snoopy seems to be doing fine.  Son has a new puppy, and that has been very good for the old boy. Thanks for asking Janet.

If you give Keepthefaith a "little" kiss ... he will do anything.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 09:49:35 PM
After stock sales of Superior offshore.Louis Schaefer and R joshua Koch walked away with close to 90 million dollars?If this is true.See link below.Explain to me how The Persistence had run outta money??Please correct me if my calculations are wrong as i'm not a Financial Guru!

http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1372326-2.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 09:51:45 PM
Hotping!!

I hope your hubby is OK!  You mentioned that had been had the doctors with him this morning.

Hugs.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 09:55:38 PM
Lifesong,

If you were asking for our opinion of Mos & Richardson, I would have to say that I do not trust either one, but that is because of all that we've seen happen and not happen over the past almost 4 years. 

That said, having had a chief and detective in the family, I know that there are power struggles at times when departments have to work with the prosecutor's office.  Each takes pride in their work, and I'm certain ego comes into play, as well.   It should be a coordinated effort. 

In Aruba, with the judicial system we can't possibly understand,  my take is the prosecutor's office called the shots.  Right there is a setting that might undermine the self-proclaimed talents of the chief and his underlings, which might produce statements contradicting the stance of prosecutor.   jmo


Thanks 2NJ, that makes a lot of sense. 

I guess my initial impression was that the prosecutor's office can only work with the evidence and statements taken by ALE...so if Van der Straaten initiated the cover-up and the police force under him followed his lead ala Dennis Jacobs' incredibly incompetent questioning, then at the end of the day the prosecutor has nothing.

I think they are both corrupt.  However, iirc Richardson's wife was van der Straaten's secretary.  Also, if I've been following ceasu's posts correctly, Mos may have been ratting out ole' Rudy's corruption regime to the homeland in that VNO report & it got him sent home early...

Then again - it's always possible I've misunderstood everything.

Except that Tim Trahan, in my opinion, should never be hired to dive anywhere for anything.



 ::MonkeyHaHa::   I may have had the Aruba prosecutor vs. polis dept. all wrong.  You have a better grasp on the details re: Mos, VanderStraten, Rudy, etc. 

As for Trahan, I wanted to respond to Wreck's post asking what they were looking at before the skate stirred the sea bottom...and then ended with the 1 minute of air question! (too funny), but this computer was wacky today, and I had to do a little cleanup....kept me out of here, more than in.........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 09:56:21 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 09:59:30 PM
After stock sales of Superior offshore.Louis Schaefer and R joshua Koch walked away with close to 90 million dollars?If this is true.See link below.Explain to me how The Persistence had run outta money??Please correct me if my calculations are wrong as i'm not a Financial Guru!

http://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1372326-2.htm

Schaefer walked away with close to 40 million in one big stock sale.  There were others.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 10:01:20 PM
You Guyyyyyyys.  Stop!!  lol    
::MonkeyWaa::   ::MonkeyLaugh::   ::MonkeyTongue::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyWink::

Snoopy seems to be doing fine.  Son has a new puppy, and that has been very good for the old boy. Thanks for asking Janet.

If you give Keepthefaith a "little" kiss ... he will do anything.

Janet


 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

No way!!  Hubby would not like me sharing his kisses.

Well...... k just one   :smt058

ssshhhhhhh. 

Rock On!!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 24, 2009, 10:02:16 PM
Lifesong,

If you were asking for our opinion of Mos & Richardson, I would have to say that I do not trust either one, but that is because of all that we've seen happen and not happen over the past almost 4 years. 

That said, having had a chief and detective in the family, I know that there are power struggles at times when departments have to work with the prosecutor's office.  Each takes pride in their work, and I'm certain ego comes into play, as well.   It should be a coordinated effort. 

In Aruba, with the judicial system we can't possibly understand,  my take is the prosecutor's office called the shots.  Right there is a setting that might undermine the self-proclaimed talents of the chief and his underlings, which might produce statements contradicting the stance of prosecutor.   jmo


Thanks 2NJ, that makes a lot of sense. 

I guess my initial impression was that the prosecutor's office can only work with the evidence and statements taken by ALE...so if Van der Straaten initiated the cover-up and the police force under him followed his lead ala Dennis Jacobs' incredibly incompetent questioning, then at the end of the day the prosecutor has nothing.

I think they are both corrupt.  However, iirc Richardson's wife was van der Straaten's secretary.  Also, if I've been following ceasu's posts correctly, Mos may have been ratting out ole' Rudy's corruption regime to the homeland in that VNO report & it got him sent home early...

Then again - it's always possible I've misunderstood everything.

Except that Tim Trahan, in my opinion, should never be hired to dive anywhere for anything.



 ::MonkeyHaHa::   I may have had the Aruba prosecutor vs. polis dept. all wrong.  You have a better grasp on the details re: Mos, VanderStraten, Rudy, etc. 

As for Trahan, I wanted to respond to Wreck's post asking what they were looking at before the skate stirred the sea bottom...and then ended with the 1 minute of air question! (too funny), but this computer was wacky today, and I had to do a little cleanup....kept me out of here, more than in.........
Well, it is just plain ridiculous! Kyle told us that a skate stirred up the bottom right before the "dive time was up" --- what hell did they see BEFORE the skate????????????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:03:04 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.

If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 10:06:35 PM

<snip>

You remind me of a couple of Beagles that were a part of our family years ago.  Those two little "bloodhounds" would follow a scent until the whiskers around those noses were nothing but stubble.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thank you.

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I think that is one of the nicest things anyone has ever said to me!  And it cracked me up!!

Thank you, Janet.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 24, 2009, 10:06:50 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.

If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

And the knit goat wool socks, courtesy of Magnolia, hidden in the safe...

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 10:07:44 PM

So all of this information that you guys are gathering....what can be done with it?  Who can it be sent to that could do something with the information?  Because ya'll are definately onto something.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 10:08:06 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.

If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

That's what I figured!  I knew you had the money stockpiled. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 10:13:08 PM

So all of this information that you guys are gathering....what can be done with it?  Who can it be sent to that could do something with the information?  Because ya'll are definately onto something.

From reading the court document it looks like they know quite a bit.How far they follow the trail remains to be seen.If i was a juror.just from what i've seen!TOAST,BURNT TOAST for all those who unloaded stock... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:13:56 PM
Here is the list of names of people who have had the PO Box 948 Kemah Tx 77565...Let Me say that one of these people still has this box and one had it back in November 2007 Could be the same person who had it in 2007 has it now...there is no way to know because the source that I use does not tell You the timeframe that each person had it......I did learn from a confidential source that some of these names are not the ones that had it in November 2007 but unfortunately that source would not tell Me the one that did have it in November 2007....All I can say is that one of these names is the one that had it in November 2007.....

I know its Very confusing and I really tried to narrow it down as much as possible but I could only do so much......I will make one more phone call tomorrow to see if I can identify who had it in November 2007 then I will have to say that is about all that I can do to try and get the information that We need......If any of You other Monkeys have any ideas on how to get more info please post about it....  ::MonkeyWink:: It is possible that one of these people are connected to Louis Schaefer or Greg Landry...I just don't know which one..... ::MonkeyEek::



Brian David Collier
Stephanie Collier
Rebecca Collier
Katherine Friston Collier
Ted M Collier
Kristi Machelle Collier
Judy F Collier
Mark J Collier
Brenda Francis Royall
Jerry Andrew Royall
Misty Dawn Bright Kautzmann
Keith Nicholas Kautzmann
Holly J Cooper
Connie J Lehotsky Jones...Eliminated
Michael John Jones....Eliminated
Brooke Bradley Perkins
Debra B Bright Antley...Eliminated
Debra B Coward
Ellis Carl Antley....Eliminated
Anita Antley...Elimianted
Holly J Cooper
Sally A Felger
Lisa A Anderson






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 10:18:07 PM


If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

That's what I figured!  I knew you had the money stockpiled. ::MonkeyCool::

I just assumed Mr. Veggie had buried wads of large unmarked bills in Tim Horton's coffee cans in the vegetable garden.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:18:29 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.

If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

That's what I figured!  I knew you had the money stockpiled. ::MonkeyCool::

Then there is Brandi's extra large lamb's wool cushion.  It is not stuffed with that popcorn styrofoam.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I am off Monkeys.

Good Night All.

Janet
7:15 PM PT







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:19:10 PM
Hotping!!

I hope your hubby is OK!  You mentioned that had been had the doctors with him this morning.

Hugs.

Janet


Thanks Janet for asking....My Hubby is doing Great.... All Tests Came back with Great Results...... ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:19:55 PM


If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

That's what I figured!  I knew you had the money stockpiled. ::MonkeyCool::

I just assumed Mr. Veggie had buried wads of large unmarked bills in Tim Horton's coffee cans in the vegetable garden.

SHHH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:21:51 PM
Hotping!!

I hope your hubby is OK!  You mentioned that had been had the doctors with him this morning.

Hugs.

Janet


Thanks Janet for asking....My Hubby is doing Great.... All Tests Came back with Great Results...... ::cartwheel::

 ::cartwheel::

Did you afford him a surprise" for dinner to celebrate?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Good Night hotping.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 10:22:17 PM
Goodnight Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: San on February 24, 2009, 10:22:26 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



And just so we are clear here is a screen capture of that original post before it was moved.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/ldstlou1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 24, 2009, 10:24:14 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.

If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Hi Monkeys!  Looks like I've been missing all the fun!

Janet, you're cracking me up!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Mere on February 24, 2009, 10:24:54 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:24:57 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



And just so we are clear here is a screen capture of that original post before it was moved.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/ldstlou1.jpg)

Thanks San.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 10:25:00 PM
I have never heard of "good businessmen" who end up with massive class action lawsuits filed against them.

That requires some pretty steamed stockholders.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:25:12 PM
Hotping!!

I hope your hubby is OK!  You mentioned that had been had the doctors with him this morning.

Hugs.

Janet


Thanks Janet for asking....My Hubby is doing Great.... All Tests Came back with Great Results...... ::cartwheel::

 ::cartwheel::

Did you afford him a surprise" for dinner to celebrate?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Good Night hotping.

Janet
No Surprise Dinner... but Ya never know about the rest of the evening.. the night is young!    ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 10:25:16 PM


If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

That's what I figured!  I knew you had the money stockpiled. ::MonkeyCool::

I just assumed Mr. Veggie had buried wads of large unmarked bills in Tim Horton's coffee cans in the vegetable garden.

SHHH

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I just wanted to make the witness list so I can be at yours and Magnolia's trial.  I hope Ducky doesn't try to eat her beautiful hat.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 24, 2009, 10:26:58 PM

Take note.  Lou's post regarding the lawsuit can now only be viewed by members of the Gold Monkey's site.

Janet

______

INTIMIDATION MEANT TO SILENCE?

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #801 2/18 -
« Reply #451 on: February 19, 2009, 02:21:24 AM »


billb ... I sooo frustrated.  After reading Kyle Kingman's own words ... my quest to further  justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family dictates that I would not give John Silvetti the time of day.  I would spit on him.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4554.msg679694#msg679694


ldstlou
HMMMMMM! New Lawsuit and It Ain't Dr. Phil
« on: Today at 06:27:57 pm »


I was just tipped off to an upcoming lawsuit and it ain't Dr. Phil's!!

Me thinks you should not be slandering the names of good businessmen nor spitting on them either, especially businessmen with way more money than you  and way more to lose by slander!

I guess some people think it can go on and on for months and not get tiresome. I think they guessed wrong!!

http://goldmonkey.org/index.php?topic=871.0


I would assume there has been some research being done on Tamikosmom's financial status "over there".

How else would Lou know that John Silvetti has "way more money".  After all ... it is just Scared Monkeys who speculate.

Janet



I wondered myself how she knew how much money you had, Janet.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have been expecting them to post some financials and claim they were yours...like they did Kermit's info.

If time had been taken to count the unregistered bills stashed under Tamikosmom's mattress ... in the cookie jar ... in her bra and ... in the freezers ... I am sure John Silvetti and all his holdings would fade by comparison.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

That's what I figured!  I knew you had the money stockpiled. ::MonkeyCool::

Then there is Brandi's extra large lamb's wool cushion.  It is not stuffed with that popcorn styrofoam.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I am off Monkeys.

Good Night All.

Janet
7:15 PM PT


Goodnight Janet!  Hopefully I'll be here earlier tomorrow evening!    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:29:21 PM
OOPS....Forgot to say Good Nite Janet! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:30:30 PM
Howdy TM....Good to see You!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 24, 2009, 10:32:18 PM

Goodnight Janet!  Hopefully I'll be here earlier tomorrow evening!    ::MonkeyCool::

I miss looking up and ... you are not there texasmom.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Son and DIL stopped by to pick up something.  I cried and ... they agreed to just "one" game of Scrabble with us.  My tears and kisses work everytime.

Good Night.

Janet
7:30 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:32:41 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 10:33:53 PM
If anyone has committed slander or libel in this regard, it would be Kyle as the is the source for all the information as to the activities aboad the Persistence.

Therefore, any suit would have to be against Kyle. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 10:34:18 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

Thanx HotPing.I willl try as well!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 24, 2009, 10:35:55 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

Great work, HotPing!

Goodnight, Janet!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 10:42:13 PM
Wonderful news
If anyone has committed slander or libel in this regard, it would be Kyle as the is the source for all the information as to the activities aboad the Persistence.

Therefore, any suit would have to be against Kyle. 



Exactly.   geeezzz  why can't some people get it.  Everything we have discussed here on this subject is based on Kyle Kingman's own words.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:42:59 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

Thanx HotPing.I willl try as well!
Thanks KTF.....I need all the help I can get..... ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 24, 2009, 10:43:38 PM
Wonderful news about your hubby, Hotping.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:44:49 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

Great work, HotPing!

Goodnight, Janet!


Thank You Lifesong......Your Work is Pretty Great Too!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 24, 2009, 10:45:57 PM
If anyone has committed slander or libel in this regard, it would be Kyle as the is the source for all the information as to the activities aboad the Persistence.

Therefore, any suit would have to be against Kyle. 



Anna - exactly


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 10:46:10 PM
Wonderful news about your hubby, Hotping.
Thank You Snoopy!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 10:55:08 PM
If anyone has committed slander or libel in this regard, it would be Kyle as the is the source for all the information as to the activities aboad the Persistence.

Therefore, any suit would have to be against Kyle. 



Anna - exactly

Well, at least if there is a lawsuit, we will at last get to find out if young Kyle was posting the truth or not. 

But I don't put much faith in any of those so closely associated with the screwing over of all the stockholders.  That is just a lowdown thing to do and something just not done by people of high moral standing.

Just my opinion.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 24, 2009, 10:58:39 PM
We have such lovely monkeys!! ::MonkeyDance::

And it is so nice when the trolls stay away. ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on February 24, 2009, 10:58:48 PM
I have never heard of "good businessmen" who end up with massive class action lawsuits filed against them.

That requires some pretty steamed stockholders.



Better watch out...
There might be another lawsuit...
And it ain't Dr. Phil either...

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on February 24, 2009, 10:58:55 PM
I have never heard of "good businessmen" who end up with massive class action lawsuits filed against them.

That requires some pretty steamed stockholders.



Here again EVERYTHING that has been posted concerning these people was gleaned from a simple Google Search.  Slander cannot happen if all the information was public knowledge.  Amazing these people do not understand Slander cannot happen when you ONLY use their words or their public records.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 11:02:34 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

I have already started to look.  Found a Kautzmann involved in real estate....
http://www.matrixai.net:8080/rdinews.html

the two on the list graduated in 1993...twins?  I have been looking since you posted and numby that I can be, I didn't grab that link.  Someone may find it and post before I get back to it.

Thanks for the digging on that PO Box, Hotping.  It's worth a shot.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 24, 2009, 11:02:39 PM
I have never heard of "good businessmen" who end up with massive class action lawsuits filed against them.

That requires some pretty steamed stockholders.



Here again EVERYTHING that has been posted concerning these people was gleaned from a simple Google Search.  Slander cannot happen if all the information was public knowledge.  Amazing these people do not understand Slander cannot happen when you ONLY use their words or their public records.


I wonder if all those stockholders are "slandering" as well, lol. 

And the SEC for that matter.  Whole lot of slandering goin on!

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 11:09:11 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

I have already started to look.  Found a Kautzmann involved in real estate....
http://www.matrixai.net:8080/rdinews.html

the two on the list graduated in 1993...twins?  I have been looking since you posted and numby that I can be, I didn't grab that link.  Someone may find it and post before I get back to it.

Thanks for the digging on that PO Box, Hotping.  It's worth a shot.



Found that link.  Clear Lake HS 1993

KEITH NICHOLAS KAUTZMANN
MISTY DAWN KAUTZMANN

http://namesdatabase.com/schools/US/TX/Houston/Clear%20Lake%20High%20School/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 11:21:55 PM
Hotping....   ::MonkeyDance::    Looking good...!  Mere
Thank You Mere.....I Am going to try to research each name and see if I can find a connection between the so called bad guys..... ::MonkeyWink::

I have already started to look.  Found a Kautzmann involved in real estate....
http://www.matrixai.net:8080/rdinews.html

the two on the list graduated in 1993...twins?  I have been looking since you posted and numby that I can be, I didn't grab that link.  Someone may find it and post before I get back to it.

Thanks for the digging on that PO Box, Hotping.  It's worth a shot.



Found that link.  Clear Lake HS 1993

KEITH NICHOLAS KAUTZMANN
MISTY DAWN KAUTZMANN

http://namesdatabase.com/schools/US/TX/Houston/Clear%20Lake%20High%20School/
Thanks 2NJ! I was off looking for connections too! I had not gotten to this one yet!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 24, 2009, 11:23:02 PM
Howdy TM....Good to see You!  ::MonkeyDance::

Howdy Hotping!  Good to be here, glad to hear all tests were good for your hubby!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 11:23:29 PM
I have never heard of "good businessmen" who end up with massive class action lawsuits filed against them.

That requires some pretty steamed stockholders.



Here again EVERYTHING that has been posted concerning these people was gleaned from a simple Google Search.  Slander cannot happen if all the information was public knowledge.  Amazing these people do not understand Slander cannot happen when you ONLY use their words or their public records.


I wonder if all those stockholders are "slandering" as well, lol. 

And the SEC for that matter.  Whole lot of slandering goin on!

 ::MonkeyDance::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: hotping on February 24, 2009, 11:27:29 PM
Howdy TM....Good to see You!  ::MonkeyDance::

Howdy Hotping!  Good to be here, glad to hear all tests were good for your hubby!   ::MonkeyCool::
Thank You TM....It really made Me happy today to see those Great Results.... Praise God..... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 11:34:45 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/modlock4.gif)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 24, 2009, 11:35:06 PM
I think I'm finally caught up!   ::MonkeyDance::

GREAT WORK EVERYONE!!!!!     ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 11:35:57 PM
Great find KTF



(http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/7987/superioroffshorestocks.jpg)

(http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/2166/superioroffshorestocks2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 11:39:46 PM
Case 6:08-cv-00400
Document 1
Filed 03/25/2008
Page 1 of 24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ELLEN BRODSKY, Individually and on
)
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.

)
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL,
INC., LOUIS E. SCHAEFER, JR., JAMES J.
MERMIS, PATRICE CHEMIN, ROGER D.
BURKS, R. JOSHUA KOCH, JR., E.
DONALD TERRY, LEON CODRON,
THOMAS B. COLEMAN, JAMES L.
PERSKY, ERIC N. SMITH, MERRILL
LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
INCORPORATED and J.P. MORGAN
SECURITIES INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No.
CLASS ACTION
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 11:40:48 PM
It's a little clearer when you read the dates and times!Quite alarming to say the least! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 24, 2009, 11:41:01 PM
(http://wtv-zone.com/emma/mardi/gifs/orangemask.gif)

I'm not sure I'll be able to be here for the thread change....I know Klaas will be around for a bit on the west coast....I hope, I hope....

Take care, Monkeys.  I will be back....just not sure when. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: cajun miracle on February 24, 2009, 11:42:11 PM
Hope that everyone had a great MARDI GRAS. We had parades, bands, dancing, family, friends and tons of Cajun food.

HAPPY MARDI GRAS TO ALL MONKEYS!
   ::MonkeyDance::

Hope to catch up now.

Cajun Miracle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 11:45:04 PM
Kermit!But after the unloading of close to a 100 million dollars in stock they didn't have any more money for the  search in Aruba??????? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 11:45:39 PM
April 20, 2007-  defendants conducted the IPO pursuant to a false and misleading
Registration Statement and Prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

4/25/07 - Louis Schafer and R. JOSHUA KOCH, JR. were selling their stocks

Schaefer sold or otherwise disposed of over 1.725 million shares of his Superior Offshore stock for proceeds of $25.87 million in the Offering.

Defendant Koch prepared and signed the materially false and misleading Registration Statement.
Koch sold 1.3 million shares of Superior Offshore stock through Schaefer Holdings LLP for
proceeds of $19.5 million in the Offering. During the relevant period, Koch sold an additional
64,667 shares of his Superior Offshore stock for proceeds of over $634,486.15.
Source: Case 6:08-cv-00400
Document 1
Filed 03/25/2008
Page 5 of 24


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 11:48:49 PM
Kermit!But after the unloading of close to a 100 million dollars in stock they didn't have any more money for the  search in Aruba??????? ::MonkeyLaugh::

Looks bad, looks very bad.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 24, 2009, 11:51:53 PM
Kermit!But after the unloading of close to a 100 million dollars in stock they didn't have any more money for the  search in Aruba??????? ::MonkeyLaugh::

Looks bad, looks very bad.





After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 24, 2009, 11:54:24 PM
After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL @ rainman



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: crazymom on February 25, 2009, 12:02:45 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 12:02:55 AM
After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL @ rainman



From the movie Rainman

Raymond: Uh oh fart. Uh oh fart.
Charlie: Did you fart, Ray? Did you f'ing fart?
Raymond: Fart.
Charlie: [trying unsuccessfully to open the door] How can you stand that?
Raymond: I don't mind it.
Charlie: How can you stand it?
Raymond: Ten minutes to Wapner. We're definitely locked in this box with no TV.


No more off topic 2nj.Just thought the humor was good!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 25, 2009, 12:06:39 AM
FEBRUARY 1, 2008 Superior is reorganizing & in a cash flow crunch.
http://tinyurl.com/55995b

FEBRUARY 29 LAWSUIT ANNOUNCED ON SCHAEFFER'S COMPANY BY A LAW FIRM IN LOUISIANA
http://au.us.biz.yahoo.com/iw/080229/0368776.html

KYLE SAYS ON HIS OTHER WEBSITE THAT THE SEARCH ENDED AT THE END OF FEBRUARY BECAUSE OF LACK OF FUNDING AND OTHER FACTORS

This project is currently temporarily suspended due to funding constraints and other factors.
 http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

March 1, 2008 LegallyLex Posted at BFN - about the Persistence leaving and needing more money

MARCH 3, 2008 - RV PERSISTENCE HEADS BACK TO LOUISIANA AND STOPS SEARCH


SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL INC. NT 10-K, 4/1/2008, 12/31/2007, View this filing in your web browser with section navigation. ...
www.edgar-online.com/brand/CreditRisk/search/?sym=DEEP

April 3, 2008 -Posted at BFN I feel the sites are as safe as they can be. All survey data that was collected, other than what was shared with the authorities, is in our possesion. No data has yet to be released, especially target data......locations.
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.15

APRIL 20, 2007, Superior Offshore and Company insiders sold over 10 million shares of common stock to the public, raising gross proceeds in excess of $152 million
http://securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/

APRIL 24 OF ALL OF THE OFFICERS RESIGNED FROM SUPERIOR OFFSHORE COMPANY

APRIL 25 THEY ANNOUNCED FILING A CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080425/laf521.html?.v=2

4/25/07 - Louis Schafer and R. JOSHUA KOCH, JR. were selling their stocks

Schaefer sold or otherwise disposed of over 1.725 million shares of his Superior Offshore stock for proceeds of $25.87 million in the Offering.

On May 8, 2008, the Company filed a motion with the Court for authority to sell a
12-Man 300 meter skid-mounted saturation diving system and related
equipment to Global Industries Offshore LLC (“Global”) for a cash payment
of $6,750,000.00




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 25, 2009, 12:06:42 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Hey, crazymom!!!!  Long time not see.  I have no idea what blue monkeys is.....some thoughts come to mind, but they are just hmmmmmm things.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: crazymom on February 25, 2009, 12:06:47 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Sorry... I meant Gold Monkey.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 25, 2009, 12:08:00 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Hi Crazymom!  Not sure what you mean blue monkeys?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Kermit on February 25, 2009, 12:08:25 AM
After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL @ rainman



From the movie Rainman

Raymond: Uh oh fart. Uh oh fart.
Charlie: Did you fart, Ray? Did you f'ing fart?
Raymond: Fart.
Charlie: [trying unsuccessfully to open the door] How can you stand that?
Raymond: I don't mind it.
Charlie: How can you stand it?
Raymond: Ten minutes to Wapner. We're definitely locked in this box with no TV.


No more off topic 2nj.Just thought the humor was good!

That scene was for real. Tom Cruise said that Dustin Hoffman farted when they were about to do the scene and they just went with it and ad-libed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: crazymom on February 25, 2009, 12:09:00 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Hey, crazymom!!!!  Long time not see.  I have no idea what blue monkeys is.....some thoughts come to mind, but they are just hmmmmmm things.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sometimes m fingers work fast than my mind. I meant Gold Monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 25, 2009, 12:10:14 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Sorry... I meant Gold Monkey.

Goldmonkey is a forum that Carnut started.  I'm sure if any of the members have your email address you will be getting an invite soon ::MonkeyWink::  There are some current SM members there and some banned members.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 12:13:48 AM
After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL @ rainman



From the movie Rainman

Raymond: Uh oh fart. Uh oh fart.
Charlie: Did you fart, Ray? Did you f'ing fart?
Raymond: Fart.
Charlie: [trying unsuccessfully to open the door] How can you stand that?
Raymond: I don't mind it.
Charlie: How can you stand it?
Raymond: Ten minutes to Wapner. We're definitely locked in this box with no TV.


No more off topic 2nj.Just thought the humor was good!

That scene was for real. Tom Cruise said that Dustin Hoffman farted when they were about to do the scene and they just went with it and ad-libed.



Now that's funny Kermit!We should take a poll and see how much many we think these gentleman happened to stash in OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS...anyone ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: crazymom on February 25, 2009, 12:13:55 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Sorry... I meant Gold Monkey.

Goldmonkey is a forum that Carnut started.  I'm sure if any of the members have your email address you will be getting an invite soon ::MonkeyWink::  There are some current SM members there and some banned members.

Thanks.  I read here as much as possible but not as much as I would like!  I try to stay a little caught up. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: crazymom on February 25, 2009, 12:15:02 AM
After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL @ rainman



From the movie Rainman

Raymond: Uh oh fart. Uh oh fart.
Charlie: Did you fart, Ray? Did you f'ing fart?
Raymond: Fart.
Charlie: [trying unsuccessfully to open the door] How can you stand that?
Raymond: I don't mind it.
Charlie: How can you stand it?
Raymond: Ten minutes to Wapner. We're definitely locked in this box with no TV.


No more off topic 2nj.Just thought the humor was good!

That scene was for real. Tom Cruise said that Dustin Hoffman farted when they were about to do the scene and they just went with it and ad-libed.



Now that's funny Kermit!We should take a poll and see how much many we think these gentleman happened to stash in OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS...anyone ::MonkeyHaHa::

In Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: cajun miracle on February 25, 2009, 12:18:12 AM
I need some help please When did Silvetti ask for Donations at BFN and what address did he ask the donations be sent to....

Also can anyone tell me the date of this article....TIA

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=7429813

I have been at Dr appointments all day with DH so I'm just now getting to research some more on the PO Box in Kemah but I do have it narrowed down to a few names.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Hotping, If I remember this was in our local paper the week that the Persistance was to leave for Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 12:42:16 AM
After selling off close to 100 million in stocks,having no money to continue the search for Natalee Holloway,and continuing to ask for donations???Something must be somewhat Hinky???You sounded like Rainman there for a second!Bad,very bad,very,very bad!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL @ rainman



From the movie Rainman

Raymond: Uh oh fart. Uh oh fart.
Charlie: Did you fart, Ray? Did you f'ing fart?
Raymond: Fart.
Charlie: [trying unsuccessfully to open the door] How can you stand that?
Raymond: I don't mind it.
Charlie: How can you stand it?
Raymond: Ten minutes to Wapner. We're definitely locked in this box with no TV.


No more off topic 2nj.Just thought the humor was good!

That scene was for real. Tom Cruise said that Dustin Hoffman farted when they were about to do the scene and they just went with it and ad-libed.



Now that's funny Kermit!We should take a poll and see how much many we think these gentleman happened to stash in OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS...anyone ::MonkeyHaHa::

In Aruba?

Could be a probability!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: snoopy on February 25, 2009, 12:45:54 AM
Hey Monkeys!!! Long time no see.  I was listening to the radio this morning and they were talking about Natalee Holloway.  It made me smile to know that Natalee is not forgotten by more than just us!

I was wondering if someone could tell me who/what blue monkeys is? TIA

Good to see you calm.... I mean crazymom.  Hope things are going well  Don't know about no blue monkeys, but then I don't know Jack ecxept that me thinks Silvettin and some others might be coming into a whole lot of trouble.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: texasmom on February 25, 2009, 12:58:17 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

Truth & Justice for Natalee!


Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 12:59:57 AM
Goodnight TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 01:10:57 AM

This is fascinating:

Superior Offshore International Q3 2007 Earnings Call Transcript

November 15, 2007

http://seekingalpha.com/article/54414-superior-offshore-international-q3-2007-earnings-call-transcript?source=bnet&page=1


Here's a clip from the Q & A:

<snip>

Operator
Here next question comes from the line of Alan Laws of Merrill Lynch.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Hi guys, good morning.
Jim Mermis
Good morning.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
I have got a few questions here for you. I don't know how much you are going to want to answer some of them, but the first one has to do with the international, in your international contracts and what you see or what you have as bids in hand, and when do you expect to announce additional contracts here to establish maybe some backlog to back up you should 320 to 350 revenue forecast for next year?
Jim Mermis
Yes, Alan, we are very actively biding projects in West Africa and the Middle East. We’ve got some $300 million worth of bids out. We expect awards to start happening pretty soon. To tell you we have a project in our hand for Africa and the Middle East, we do not.
But within the next few weeks, we believe that projects will be awarded, and we have been shortlisted and told that we were the frontrunner for some of the significant projects we are bidding.
We’ve also got work in hand in Trinidad, half of the BP project, and as I said previously, we have already picked up other work in Trinidad for two other operators there with an ROV vessel. So we're feeling pretty good about the future coming up internationally.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. Last quarter you had mentioned a $100 million three-year contract out of the Middle East. Where is that? Is it still out there, or did that go away?
Jim Mermis
No, no, that contract is still out there with the Middle East religious holidays, etc., it has not been awarded yet, but once again, we anticipate that is going to be awarded in the near-term future.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. The second question, a little harder here, this is the second quarter in a row that you are in violation or default of your debt facility covenants, and now it looks from the text of your comments here today on the call that from the release that you are having trouble securing the financing that you will really require through the next year.
Can you talk a little bit about your liquidity and how you are going to firm that up a little?
Roger Burks
Sure. I will talk to those. Roger Burks. We had a covenant violation related to the capital expenditures and because of the second quarter, and to expand we also had it on EBITDA. We are working with our banks that are currently in place.
The revolver, the revolving credit facility bank, which is Chase, we have adjusted the covenants and the go forward for our liquidity on a working capital basis. As far as the term loan, we currently have one bank that is in there.
They offered us certain options, and we decided to go forward with another choice. That choice we thought we were very close to signing the commitment letter, and accordingly we are very comfortable with our liquidity position going into next year.
As you can see the first nine months of this year, we had $117 million of capital expenditure. We have two payments right around the end of the year for the Achiever, totaling right around $16 million, and then we are effectively in very solid shape going into the next year for our capital expenditure plans.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. But for CapEx last quarter you said $26 million for the balance. You spend $29 million in the third quarter. What is the CapEx balance for fourth quarter?
Roger Burks
$17 million.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
$17 million? And then for next year, we have something like 50 to 60 for the completion of the Achiever. Is that not right?
Roger Burks
I believe that number is $38.6 million or $39 million, $38 million for the rest of the Achiever. The Achiever is being met. We have, as you noticed, in the management release, Tom Armstrong joined our Company. He is the Vice President of special projects, and his first special project is to focus on the Achiever.
We have other items that we are focusing on, but a few of the moves that have been made is the upgrading of the complete management team here from finance to administration to operations. And so we feel very comfortable going into next year about that we're going to meet our CapEx, we will meet our expenditures, and we will have plenty of liquidity to grow this Company.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. So $39 million for the Achiever, maintenance and then you had one more shipyard going into '08, so what would total CapEx be next year?
Roger Burks
That is a hard number to guess at this point I mean to estimate at this point. I will tell you our maintenance CapEx runs right around $12 million a year and so you have the 38, plus the 12 and…
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
And the 30-day shipyard?
Jim Mermis
The shipyard in '08 is for a chartered vessel. So, we really do not have any shipyard work coming up here next year at all.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. All right. So you are looking at $50 million, $60 million of the CapEx next year off of a $320 million revenue base and any guess at what your EBIT margin is? You are 10% now. That looks like a net consumption of capital going into next year.
Roger Burks
Well, we are not ready to project out our adjusted EBITDA for next year at this point.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. All right. The last question I had has to do with your 10b51 filing. With all the turmoil you have experienced over the last couple of quarters here and the additional charges that now you have laid out in the fourth quarter, I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the wave of insider selling over the last few weeks at sub-IPO prices?
I know we're getting a lot of calls about this. I think it is probably a good forum for you to maybe talk about this a little.
Jim Mermis
This is Jim Mermis, and as we set up the IPO here, the executive management received restricted stock. That stock vests over a four and a half year period. The first tranche came six months after the IPO, and for me a third of the stock sales represent income taxes that are due. And the rest foe myself is to diversify my personal investment holdings.
I think it is important, though, for everyone to realize that executive management guidelines for me indicate that I need to retain five times my yearly compensation in Company stock value. I currently hold over eight times my yearly earnings in Company stock.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
All right. Thanks for clearing that up, Jim. That is all I have got for questions. Thanks.

<snip>


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:14:51 AM
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT GROUP II                                             Aquatica *4
         (Group 4)                                           William Bratkowski
                                                             Chris Charpentier
                                                             Scott Coker
                                                             Scott Croft
                                                             Ed Klein
                                                             Pat Laughlin
                                                             Jerry Lowrimore
                                                             Patrice McIntosh
                                                             Lynn Mondo
                                                             Pete Orlando
                                                             Chris Stevens
                                                             Carol Sturdevant
                                                             Carl Thornton
                                                             Beverly Verret
                                                             J. D. Wilson
                                                             Charlie Youngblood


http://sec.edgar-online.com/helix-energy-solutions-group-inc/10-k-annual-report/2001/04/02/Section5.aspx


Legacy Offshore, LLC
Jerry Lowrimore, HESS Director



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:31:34 AM

This is fascinating:

Superior Offshore International Q3 2007 Earnings Call Transcript

November 15, 2007

http://seekingalpha.com/article/54414-superior-offshore-international-q3-2007-earnings-call-transcript?source=bnet&page=1


Here's a clip from the Q & A:

<snip>

Operator
Here next question comes from the line of Alan Laws of Merrill Lynch.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Hi guys, good morning.
Jim Mermis
Good morning.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
I have got a few questions here for you. I don't know how much you are going to want to answer some of them, but the first one has to do with the international, in your international contracts and what you see or what you have as bids in hand, and when do you expect to announce additional contracts here to establish maybe some backlog to back up you should 320 to 350 revenue forecast for next year?
Jim Mermis
Yes, Alan, we are very actively biding projects in West Africa and the Middle East. We’ve got some $300 million worth of bids out. We expect awards to start happening pretty soon. To tell you we have a project in our hand for Africa and the Middle East, we do not.
But within the next few weeks, we believe that projects will be awarded, and we have been shortlisted and told that we were the frontrunner for some of the significant projects we are bidding.
We’ve also got work in hand in Trinidad, half of the BP project, and as I said previously, we have already picked up other work in Trinidad for two other operators there with an ROV vessel. So we're feeling pretty good about the future coming up internationally.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. Last quarter you had mentioned a $100 million three-year contract out of the Middle East. Where is that? Is it still out there, or did that go away?
Jim Mermis
No, no, that contract is still out there with the Middle East religious holidays, etc., it has not been awarded yet, but once again, we anticipate that is going to be awarded in the near-term future.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. The second question, a little harder here, this is the second quarter in a row that you are in violation or default of your debt facility covenants, and now it looks from the text of your comments here today on the call that from the release that you are having trouble securing the financing that you will really require through the next year.
Can you talk a little bit about your liquidity and how you are going to firm that up a little?
Roger Burks
Sure. I will talk to those. Roger Burks. We had a covenant violation related to the capital expenditures and because of the second quarter, and to expand we also had it on EBITDA. We are working with our banks that are currently in place.
The revolver, the revolving credit facility bank, which is Chase, we have adjusted the covenants and the go forward for our liquidity on a working capital basis. As far as the term loan, we currently have one bank that is in there.
They offered us certain options, and we decided to go forward with another choice. That choice we thought we were very close to signing the commitment letter, and accordingly we are very comfortable with our liquidity position going into next year.
As you can see the first nine months of this year, we had $117 million of capital expenditure. We have two payments right around the end of the year for the Achiever, totaling right around $16 million, and then we are effectively in very solid shape going into the next year for our capital expenditure plans.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. But for CapEx last quarter you said $26 million for the balance. You spend $29 million in the third quarter. What is the CapEx balance for fourth quarter?
Roger Burks
$17 million.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
$17 million? And then for next year, we have something like 50 to 60 for the completion of the Achiever. Is that not right?
Roger Burks
I believe that number is $38.6 million or $39 million, $38 million for the rest of the Achiever. The Achiever is being met. We have, as you noticed, in the management release, Tom Armstrong joined our Company. He is the Vice President of special projects, and his first special project is to focus on the Achiever.
We have other items that we are focusing on, but a few of the moves that have been made is the upgrading of the complete management team here from finance to administration to operations. And so we feel very comfortable going into next year about that we're going to meet our CapEx, we will meet our expenditures, and we will have plenty of liquidity to grow this Company.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. So $39 million for the Achiever, maintenance and then you had one more shipyard going into '08, so what would total CapEx be next year?
Roger Burks
That is a hard number to guess at this point I mean to estimate at this point. I will tell you our maintenance CapEx runs right around $12 million a year and so you have the 38, plus the 12 and…
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
And the 30-day shipyard?
Jim Mermis
The shipyard in '08 is for a chartered vessel. So, we really do not have any shipyard work coming up here next year at all.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. All right. So you are looking at $50 million, $60 million of the CapEx next year off of a $320 million revenue base and any guess at what your EBIT margin is? You are 10% now. That looks like a net consumption of capital going into next year.
Roger Burks
Well, we are not ready to project out our adjusted EBITDA for next year at this point.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
Okay. All right. The last question I had has to do with your 10b51 filing. With all the turmoil you have experienced over the last couple of quarters here and the additional charges that now you have laid out in the fourth quarter, I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the wave of insider selling over the last few weeks at sub-IPO prices?
I know we're getting a lot of calls about this. I think it is probably a good forum for you to maybe talk about this a little.
Jim Mermis
This is Jim Mermis, and as we set up the IPO here, the executive management received restricted stock. That stock vests over a four and a half year period. The first tranche came six months after the IPO, and for me a third of the stock sales represent income taxes that are due. And the rest foe myself is to diversify my personal investment holdings.
I think it is important, though, for everyone to realize that executive management guidelines for me indicate that I need to retain five times my yearly compensation in Company stock value. I currently hold over eight times my yearly earnings in Company stock.
Alan Laws - Merrill Lynch
All right. Thanks for clearing that up, Jim. That is all I have got for questions. Thanks.

<snip>
These boys are in deep kimchi..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:31:37 AM
AS i'm not a financial guy LifeSong.What are they saying.From reading it it sounds like they're Bullshi--ing??TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:32:31 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:37:41 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wrong by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:38:35 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wronged by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:41:49 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wronged by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....
Not to diminish the lawsuit brought on by the stockholders.....they lost money....
Natalee's family may have lost their only real change to recover her remains...

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:42:35 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wronged by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....

Schaefer taking off with around 60 to 100 million dollars leaving the shareholders in the toilet all the while living like a king.From what i've read they should all be in Jail before long.UNLESS.We can find the ol' donation trail???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 01:43:41 AM


You got it, KTF.  The entire conference call is one steaming plateful.  And the boys on the other end of the line know it. 

What the boys on the other end of the line do not know is Legacy OffShore is already in the works.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 25, 2009, 01:44:27 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:44:28 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wronged by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....
Not to diminish the lawsuit brought on by the stockholders.....they lost money....
Natalee's family may have lost their only real chance to recover her remains...

 
Where is spellchecker? I guess it can't fix my fat fingers... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:44:55 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wronged by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....
Not to diminish the lawsuit brought on by the stockholders.....they lost money....
Natalee's family may have lost their only real change to recover her remains...

 

Agreed Billb.think about it.Having a bunch of FRAUDS searcher for your loved one in the oceans off Aruba.Which to the OIL people are oceans of GOLD i would think??

Very sad for Beth,Dave,Jug and Robin!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:45:50 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!

We can stack with the best of em Klaas! ::MonkeyTongue:: Just kidding!

Goodnight Klaas! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 01:46:24 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Thanks, Klaas.

Goodnight & God Bless



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:48:17 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up of others are willing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:51:00 AM


You got it, KTF.  The entire conference call is one steaming plateful.  And the boys on the other end of the line know it. 

What the boys on the other end of the line do not know is Legacy OffShore is already in the works.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyNoNo::



I've been searching for anything on Legacy Offshore.Haven't found anything as of now!I will have to read that court document again.Would be interesting to know if the plaintiffs lawyers are aware.You would think!Looked like Schaefer was funneling money to his kids by employeeing them to do nothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:51:33 AM
You read about Superior and Legacy BillB???
Deeper Kimchi... ::MonkeyCool::
Now let's see if our Justice dept/state Dept. have the cojones to apply leverage wrt to the persistence "search" to achieve Justice for Natalee, an American citizen, wronged by the "powers that be" in aruba and the NL.....
Not to diminish the lawsuit brought on by the stockholders.....they lost money....
Natalee's family may have lost their only real change to recover her remains...

 

Agreed Billb.think about it.Having a bunch of FRAUDS searcher for your loved one in the oceans off Aruba.Which to the OIL people are oceans of GOLD i would think??

Very sad for Beth,Dave,Jug and Robin!
If our Justice dept/State dept had a mind to do right by an American citizen and her family, this could be the springboard that topples the house of cards built up through the coverup, starting in aruba and, at the very least, condoned by the motherland...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:52:21 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up if others are willing!

::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:52:22 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up of others are willing!


what you baack for klaas?You thought the stackin party already started?? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 01:52:50 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up of others are willing!


I'm dodging in and out among all the files I've got open!  I'm supposed to be working on cleaning up links, but in doing so I keep finding more interesting things to read!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 01:55:25 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up of others are willing!


I'm dodging in and out among all the files I've got open!  I'm supposed to be working on cleaning up links, but in doing so I keep finding more interesting things to read!



It is very perplexing how these FRAUDS have not been arrested.WTH is the SEC doing??Oh.I forgot they got Madoff,as well as Madoff JR(Sir Allen Stanford)! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 01:58:29 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up of others are willing!


I'm dodging in and out among all the files I've got open!  I'm supposed to be working on cleaning up links, but in doing so I keep finding more interesting things to read!


Lifesong,
If I haven't said it already, the timeline you are putting together is Excellent!. I have it bookmarked, and it keeps me on track. Before, I would spend wasted time researching something that was already understood, and linked!
Thank you!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 01:59:08 AM


Have you noticed we have kind of a vaccum of information on Tim Trahan? 

Where did he come from?

And where the heck did he go?  Why was he only on board for the first couple weeks and then left after his "inconclusive" sighting on 12/30? 

I just have a big fat Hinky flag on Tim Trahan. 

Is he a fall guy, a good guy, or a bad guy?

Nobody seems to be protecting or defending him, either.  That's interesting.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:01:57 AM


Have you noticed we have kind of a vaccum of information on Tim Trahan? 

Where did he come from?

And where the heck did he go?  Why was he only on board for the first couple weeks and then left after his "inconclusive" sighting on 12/30? 

I just have a big fat Hinky flag on Tim Trahan. 

Is he a fall guy, a good guy, or a bad guy?

Nobody seems to be protecting or defending him, either.  That's interesting.





That is an interesting dynamic!Am i incorrect,when i say,he and Schaefer are in business together with the Underwater expeditons??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 02:05:27 AM
I went ahead and unlocked thread #803 in case you guys get to page 50 tonight.  You probably won't but in case you do, just move yourselves over to the new thread, ok?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0

GOODNIGHT ALL!
Was this a challenge?... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm only ::MonkeyWink:: 99 years old, but I can stay up of others are willing!


I'm dodging in and out among all the files I've got open!  I'm supposed to be working on cleaning up links, but in doing so I keep finding more interesting things to read!


Lifesong,
If I haven't said it already, the timeline you are putting together is Excellent!. I have it bookmarked, and it keeps me on track. Before, I would spend wasted time researching something that was already understood, and linked!
Thank you!


Thanks, billb!  I'm so glad its useful - I always did the same thing too.  And then I'd wander off from it to something else and have to go back and look for it again a day or two later! 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 02:07:54 AM


Have you noticed we have kind of a vaccum of information on Tim Trahan? 

Where did he come from?

And where the heck did he go?  Why was he only on board for the first couple weeks and then left after his "inconclusive" sighting on 12/30? 

I just have a big fat Hinky flag on Tim Trahan. 

Is he a fall guy, a good guy, or a bad guy?

Nobody seems to be protecting or defending him, either.  That's interesting.




While John S., Louis S, K2 (kyle kingman) and even Tim Miller have come under scrutiny...everyone seems to be overlooking T2 (Tim Trahan) role in this....1 min of air left? Skate muddling up visibility in the last minute? What did T2 see prior to the skate?
Lifesong...I agree...T2 should never be hired again..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 02:08:04 AM


Have you noticed we have kind of a vaccum of information on Tim Trahan? 

Where did he come from?

And where the heck did he go?  Why was he only on board for the first couple weeks and then left after his "inconclusive" sighting on 12/30? 

I just have a big fat Hinky flag on Tim Trahan. 

Is he a fall guy, a good guy, or a bad guy?

Nobody seems to be protecting or defending him, either.  That's interesting.





That is an interesting dynamic!Am i incorrect,when i say,he and Schaefer are in business together with the Underwater expeditons??

I think they were - I read somewhere that Trahan was fired last July.  But, it may also be that they were only working together on that family charter/b&b/dock business that they bankrupted to sell off the assets.  I just don't know...

I'm starting to wonder if he's in a completely different branch of the industry...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:10:19 AM


Have you noticed we have kind of a vaccum of information on Tim Trahan? 

Where did he come from?

And where the heck did he go?  Why was he only on board for the first couple weeks and then left after his "inconclusive" sighting on 12/30? 

I just have a big fat Hinky flag on Tim Trahan. 

Is he a fall guy, a good guy, or a bad guy?

Nobody seems to be protecting or defending him, either.  That's interesting.





That is an interesting dynamic!Am i incorrect,when i say,he and Schaefer are in business together with the Underwater expeditons??

I think they were - I read somewhere that Trahan was fired last July.  But, it may also be that they were only working together on that family charter/b&b/dock business that they bankrupted to sell off the assets.  I just don't know...

I'm starting to wonder if he's in a completely different branch of the industry...


the websites are no longer up i believe!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 02:13:37 AM

Yeah billb, there's more than one way to scare up some information...   ::MonkeyWink::

KTF:  I noticed the site was down earlier tonight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:22:33 AM


Have you noticed we have kind of a vaccum of information on Tim Trahan? 

Where did he come from?

And where the heck did he go?  Why was he only on board for the first couple weeks and then left after his "inconclusive" sighting on 12/30? 

I just have a big fat Hinky flag on Tim Trahan. 

Is he a fall guy, a good guy, or a bad guy?

Nobody seems to be protecting or defending him, either.  That's interesting.




While John S., Louis S, K2 (kyle kingman) and even Tim Miller have come under scrutiny...everyone seems to be overlooking T2 (Tim Trahan) role in this....1 min of air left? Skate muddling up visibility in the last minute? What did T2 see prior to the skate?
Lifesong...I agree...T2 should never be hired again..... ::MonkeyCool::

Seriously.For an experienced diver,90 ft of water,Air in your tank and you only got 1 minute to look in that cage!I'll give the BIG OL' Bullsh-it... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 02:23:07 AM
Legacy Offshore is a leader in the field of value-added subsea and topside construction servicing both the domestic and international oil and gas industries. Our corporate family is represented by professional and highly capable personnel utilizing the latest equipment and technology at our subsea and fabrication divisions. Legacy Offshore develops lasting relationships with its clients by exceeding expectations and performing in a safe and professional manner.
http://www.legacyoffshore.com/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:24:26 AM
                                 JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

                                   GOODNIGHT AND GOD BLESS

                                       billb, peanut, Lifesong

                                            KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:26:41 AM
Legacy Offshore is a leader in the field of value-added subsea and topside construction servicing both the domestic and international oil and gas industries. Our corporate family is represented by professional and highly capable personnel utilizing the latest equipment and technology at our subsea and fabrication divisions. Legacy Offshore develops lasting relationships with its clients by exceeding expectations and performing in a safe and professional manner.
http://www.legacyoffshore.com/index.html


I had a link a page a two back about Jerry lowrimore who is on the Legacy website.He once worked for Helix/CalDive..Louis Schaefer Jr was an account manager for Caldive i believe..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:29:26 AM
Legacy Offshore is a leader in the field of value-added subsea and topside construction servicing both the domestic and international oil and gas industries. Our corporate family is represented by professional and highly capable personnel utilizing the latest equipment and technology at our subsea and fabrication divisions. Legacy Offshore develops lasting relationships with its clients by exceeding expectations and performing in a safe and professional manner.
http://www.legacyoffshore.com/index.html


I had a link a page a two back about Jerry lowrimore who is on the Legacy website.He once worked for Helix/CalDive..Louis Schaefer Jr was an account manager for Caldive i believe..


Executive Management - SuperiorOffshore.com - [Cached Version]
Published on: 11/5/2006    Last Visited: 11/5/2006   
Louis E. Schaefer Jr.Chairman of the Board

Louis E. Schaefer, Jr. founded our company and has been our Chairman of the Board since August 2006.Mr. Schaefer was our Chief Executive Officer from 1994 until August 2006.From 1986 to 1992, Mr. Schaefer was an account manager at Cal Dive International, Inc.,  an offshore energy services company, and from 1984 to 1986 he worked for American Oilfield Divers Inc., an offshore energy services company.Between 1970 and 1984, Mr. Schaefer served as Chief Executive Officer of Schaefer Diving, an offshore energy services company.


http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Schaefer_Louis_1062321252.aspx


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 25, 2009, 02:30:13 AM
Ok Monkey's!Over and out.Tomorrow is another day!


KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 25, 2009, 02:37:58 AM
Ok Monkey's!Over and out.Tomorrow is another day!


KEEPTHEFAITH
Good night KTF, Lifesong and 3 guests viewing....
Tomorrow may just be the day....That Natalee gets Justice....
The hell with aruba...
I hate them all...
I hope Karma comes to visit ::MonkeyCool:: them soon...or later.....but it is on its way..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 02:56:26 AM


http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab

Tim Trahan
(http://media.linkedin.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/3/000/017/2a8/20ffc18.jpg)
Business Management
Houston, Texas Area

Current            Business Development at Technical Automation Services
                        Owner at Trahan Financial
                        Part Owner at H2OTours

Education         Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center
                      McNeese State University
Connections     10 connections
Industry           Industrial Automation
Websites My Website


Tim Trahan’s Summary
Tim Trahan’s Specialties:
Industrial Analyzer an Sample System Intergarations, Data Aquisition, Business Consulting, Commercial Loans, Underwater Expeditions, Offshore Fishing, Scuba Diving,

Tim Trahan’s Interests:
Scuba Diving, Olympic Weightlifting, Business, Travel, Fishing, Underwater Expeditions, Golf


http://www.h2otours.net/  (Travel Deals)

http://www.tascorp.com  =  Technical Automation Services Corp.

Can't find anything on Trahan Financial.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 08:18:56 AM
Case 6:08-cv-00400
Document 1
Filed 03/25/2008
Page 1 of 24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ELLEN BRODSKY, Individually and on
)
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.

)
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL,
INC., LOUIS E. SCHAEFER, JR., JAMES J.
MERMIS, PATRICE CHEMIN, ROGER D.
BURKS, R. JOSHUA KOCH, JR., E.
DONALD TERRY
, LEON CODRON,
THOMAS B. COLEMAN, JAMES L.
PERSKY, ERIC N. SMITH, MERRILL
LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
INCORPORATED and J.P. MORGAN
SECURITIES INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No.
CLASS ACTION
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS

Funny!!!!!!

E Donald Terry is the guy who represented Superior in the signing of the sale/purchase/leaseback agreement with Legacy (Shaefer and Koch).

I didn't know he was also a defendant in the civil suit!!

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 08:30:12 AM
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT GROUP II                                             Aquatica *4
         (Group 4)                                           William Bratkowski
                                                             Chris Charpentier
                                                             Scott Coker
                                                             Scott Croft
                                                             Ed Klein
                                                             Pat Laughlin
                                                             Jerry Lowrimore
                                                             Patrice McIntosh
                                                             Lynn Mondo
                                                             Pete Orlando
                                                             Chris Stevens
                                                             Carol Sturdevant
                                                             Carl Thornton
                                                             Beverly Verret
                                                             J. D. Wilson
                                                             Charlie Youngblood


http://sec.edgar-online.com/helix-energy-solutions-group-inc/10-k-annual-report/2001/04/02/Section5.aspx


Legacy Offshore, LLC
Jerry Lowrimore, HESS Director



Whoa!!  So a direct connection between Helix and Shaefer?  via Legacy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 08:35:01 AM
Snoopy - thank you!  That means a lot.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 08:38:27 AM
TIM TRAHAN   

SCHAEFER AND UNDERWATER EXPEDITIONS-

TRAHAN Search For Natalee Holloway
KPLC-TV, LA - 18 hours ago
Trahan and Lake Charles native Louis Schaefer Jr. head up Underwater Expeditions  around the world. ...
lcpirate.com/2007/12/24/

Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions said. “We can’t stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we’ve located it, we just need to get to it.”

THIS HAS A LINK TO HIS 2 WEBSITES -TOP LINK FISHING- SECOND LINK SCUBA DIVING TOURS
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab
Located in Freeport, TX
http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/
Underwater Expeditions - 1010 West Second St.Freeport, TX 77541 

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/fishing

TIM TRAHAN'S SPECIALITIES
Underwater Expeditions, Offshore Fishing, Scuba Diving Charters
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab fishing charters - boats usedThe "Big E"

Capt. Casey

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html

H2O DIVING TOURS
Scuba Diving VacationsCaribbean Dive   Travel and World Diving   Specializing in offering the HOTTEST Deals
http://www.h2otours.net/

DOES TRIPS TO CURACAO
http://www.h2otours.net/curacao.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 08:42:41 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 08:54:49 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


I looked for the Q2 call transcripts but haven't found them yet...

...and...

I don't see how Trahan makes that quote "We can't stop...etc."  - he wasn't even there after 12/30 according to Kyle!  Doesn't make any sense at all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 08:58:09 AM
Hotping - THANK YOU for that list of names for the PO Box.

Unfortunately, I don't recognize any of them - but I'll keep looking thru my notes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 09:00:13 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


I looked for the Q2 call transcripts but haven't found them yet...

...and...

I don't see how Trahan makes that quote "We can't stop...etc."  - he wasn't even there after 12/30 according to Kyle!  Doesn't make any sense at all.



If the date on that quote is correct - he made it on Christmas Eve 2007 - just hours before they located the trap, according to Kyle.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 25, 2009, 09:17:03 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


I looked for the Q2 call transcripts but haven't found them yet...

...and...

I don't see how Trahan makes that quote "We can't stop...etc."  - he wasn't even there after 12/30 according to Kyle!  Doesn't make any sense at all.



If the date on that quote is correct - he made it on Christmas Eve 2007 - just hours before they located the trap, according to Kyle.


ANY company that is in a money crunch is NOT going to commit their valuable resources to a "humanitarian" cause. Even if Schaefer was "donating" his personal money -- his equipment and crew during that period is not out making the company money!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 25, 2009, 09:19:39 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


I looked for the Q2 call transcripts but haven't found them yet...

...and...

I don't see how Trahan makes that quote "We can't stop...etc."  - he wasn't even there after 12/30 according to Kyle!  Doesn't make any sense at all.



If the date on that quote is correct - he made it on Christmas Eve 2007 - just hours before they located the trap, according to Kyle.


ANY company that is in a money crunch is NOT going to commit their valuable resources to a "humanitarian" cause. Even if Schaefer was "donating" his personal money -- his equipment and crew during that period is not out making the company money!


With stockholders, it isn't even their to donate but would belong to the stockholders whose interest should be considered first.  I would think that is the way it works anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: wreck on February 25, 2009, 09:23:48 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


I looked for the Q2 call transcripts but haven't found them yet...

...and...

I don't see how Trahan makes that quote "We can't stop...etc."  - he wasn't even there after 12/30 according to Kyle!  Doesn't make any sense at all.



If the date on that quote is correct - he made it on Christmas Eve 2007 - just hours before they located the trap, according to Kyle.


ANY company that is in a money crunch is NOT going to commit their valuable resources to a "humanitarian" cause. Even if Schaefer was "donating" his personal money -- his equipment and crew during that period is not out making the company money!


With stockholders, it isn't even their to donate but would belong to the stockholders whose interest should be considered first.  I would think that is the way it works anyway.
Which is precisely why the stockholders are screaming!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 25, 2009, 09:38:19 AM
Lifesong - that Earnings call IS fascinating!!!!

The lies being told are just mind boggling, in light of what we all now know of what was really going on.

Notice no mention in that call of their "humanitarian" effort that was just getting underway in Aruba? ::MonkeyWink:: 


I looked for the Q2 call transcripts but haven't found them yet...

...and...

I don't see how Trahan makes that quote "We can't stop...etc."  - he wasn't even there after 12/30 according to Kyle!  Doesn't make any sense at all.



If the date on that quote is correct - he made it on Christmas Eve 2007 - just hours before they located the trap, according to Kyle.


ANY company that is in a money crunch is NOT going to commit their valuable resources to a "humanitarian" cause. Even if Schaefer was "donating" his personal money -- his equipment and crew during that period is not out making the company money!


With stockholders, it isn't even their to donate but would belong to the stockholders whose interest should be considered first.  I would think that is the way it works anyway.
Which is precisely why the stockholders are screaming!


And the SEC is issuing statements.  And I don't mean about football in this instance.  Normally, I would when referring to the only good conference in that sport.

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 25, 2009, 09:43:17 AM
Case 6:08-cv-00400
Document 1
Filed 03/25/2008
Page 1 of 24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ELLEN BRODSKY, Individually and on
)
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.

)
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL,
INC., LOUIS E. SCHAEFER, JR., JAMES J.
MERMIS, PATRICE CHEMIN, ROGER D.
BURKS, R. JOSHUA KOCH, JR., E.
DONALD TERRY, LEON CODRON,
THOMAS B. COLEMAN, JAMES L.
PERSKY, ERIC N. SMITH, MERRILL
LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
INCORPORATED and J.P. MORGAN
SECURITIES INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No.
CLASS ACTION
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS


BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 09:44:36 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 09:48:41 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



On the flip side.......

If the Aruban divers' view was NOT obscured, and if they did NOT surface when Trahan did....

Then WHY did they say "it's not case related" - yet, come back to collect items from it 8 days later?

Without the forensic dive team.

Without any divers from Persistence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 09:52:00 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



There's an awful lot about that day that we don't know yet, imo.

I woke up thinking about the quote from Tim Miller on Greta Van Sustern's FoxNews show, On The Record on 2/26/08:

"Tim:  The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA..."

I'm still holding out hope that maybe, just maybe, they did grab a sample on the 30th and the two Tims took off to get that to the FBI labs here at home, and then Tim Miller went to Costa Rica.

Is that even still plausible?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 25, 2009, 09:53:02 AM
Great find KTF



(http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/7987/superioroffshorestocks.jpg)

(http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/2166/superioroffshorestocks2.jpg)



BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 25, 2009, 09:54:12 AM
Note the timing and also that this is not the global stock decline suffered by most all companies recently but is prior to that and would seem related to insider activities.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Anna on February 25, 2009, 10:01:26 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



There's an awful lot about that day that we don't know yet, imo.

I woke up thinking about the quote from Tim Miller on Greta Van Sustern's FoxNews show, On The Record on 2/26/08:

"Tim:  The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA..."

I'm still holding out hope that maybe, just maybe, they did grab a sample on the 30th and the two Tims took off to get that to the FBI labs here at home, and then Tim Miller went to Costa Rica.

Is that even still plausible?




Lifesong,
I don't know but we were led to believe that no one actually entered the trap on that first dive, just looked.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 10:03:53 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



There's an awful lot about that day that we don't know yet, imo.

I woke up thinking about the quote from Tim Miller on Greta Van Sustern's FoxNews show, On The Record on 2/26/08:

"Tim:  The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA..."

I'm still holding out hope that maybe, just maybe, they did grab a sample on the 30th and the two Tims took off to get that to the FBI labs here at home, and then Tim Miller went to Costa Rica.

Is that even still plausible?



I really don't think so - and this is why.

When Beth was made aware of the full scope of things last September, she "needs time to digest it" and wanted to "share it with someone I trust".

That tells me the FBI never shared anything with her about DNA - positive or negative.

This was all news to her, and she was disturbed by it.

According to Kyle - the FBI said there were human remains in that cage.

I would have to presume that means the FBI did an analysis of the footage Kyle sent to them from the Dec 29th ROV dive, and came to that conclusion.

According to Kyle, there was nothing in the FBI report (that Mos read from in his presser) about DNA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 10:12:31 AM

oceanexploration posts:

Reply #743 on: March 18, 2008, 12:30:41 PM

Your frustration mirrors my own.  It's unanimous that Tim M. should never have told Dave and Beth anything about the trap until it's contents were forensically examined. 

After the diver visual inspection of the trap he was obligated to report what the Aruban divers reported because although limited, it's the only information he had  and the family rightfully wanted answers.  It was a royal mess.  I took a lot of heat for telling Tim Miller anything about the trap that may have prompted him to making the calls to the family.  In my defence, I specifically told Tim not to tell anyone about the trap until the contents are analysed.  He couldn't wait.  He was very emotional, hopeful, and confident.  It was a crushing time for all. Most of all- for Tim Miller, Dave, and Beth.  This was Dec 30th
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366324#msg366324


Reply #794 on: March 18, 2008, 03:04:38 PM The "99.9%" came independantly from Tim Miller to Dave H. on Dec 29th, prior to the diver visual inspection of the trap.   I can't imagine what that must have felt like to be told and then completely retracted the next day.  I couldn't believe the information was prematurely leaked to the family before we knew what we were looking at.  My heart broke for Dave and Beth.

Personally, I fed off of Tim's inflated confidence and my own on the night of Dec 29th.  I did not sleep. Few of us did. The only person able to remain completely objective, much to his credit, was John Silvetti.  In hindsight, I am in awe of him for his wisdom(from past hard experiences) and strength. At the time, I thought he was nuts for not siding with the rest of us after the first dive. It was a crushing dissapointment the evening of Dec 30th, but not over.  The tactile inspection dive was coming. Dec 30th, 2007 will forever stand in my mind as one of the hardest single days of my lifehttp://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366386#msg366386


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 10:13:57 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



There's an awful lot about that day that we don't know yet, imo.

I woke up thinking about the quote from Tim Miller on Greta Van Sustern's FoxNews show, On The Record on 2/26/08:

"Tim:  The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA..."

I'm still holding out hope that maybe, just maybe, they did grab a sample on the 30th and the two Tims took off to get that to the FBI labs here at home, and then Tim Miller went to Costa Rica.

Is that even still plausible?



I really don't think so - and this is why.

When Beth was made aware of the full scope of things last September, she "needs time to digest it" and wanted to "share it with someone I trust".

That tells me the FBI never shared anything with her about DNA - positive or negative.

This was all news to her, and she was disturbed by it.

According to Kyle - the FBI said there were human remains in that cage.

I would have to presume that means the FBI did an analysis of the footage Kyle sent to them from the Dec 29th ROV dive, and came to that conclusion.

According to Kyle, there was nothing in the FBI report (that Mos read from in his presser) about DNA.

See...that's what I thought.

Doesn't make sense that Tim is talking about DNA.  I just can't figure that out.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: klaasend on February 25, 2009, 10:14:04 AM
O/T

http://www.fox30online.com/news/local/story/Plane-Crash-in-Amsterdam/1ls8otBGFEKDIohF1pLi7Q.cspx

Plane Crash in Amsterdam

Last Update: 8:41 am 

Print Story | Email Story     

 AMSTERDAM (AP) - A local mayor says 9 people have been killed in the crash of a Turkish Airlines plane in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Officials say another 50 people were hurt when the plane crashed while attempting to land and broke into three pieces. There appears to have been no fire.

A Dutch reporter says the plane apeared to fall a couple of miles short of the runway of Amsterdam's main airport. The plane crashed in a field.

Turkish Airlines officials earlier said no one was killed among the 134 people aboard the plane, a Boeing 737-800.

There was no immediate word on what caused the crash, which happened in slightly misty weather with little wind.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 10:20:44 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



There's an awful lot about that day that we don't know yet, imo.

I woke up thinking about the quote from Tim Miller on Greta Van Sustern's FoxNews show, On The Record on 2/26/08:

"Tim:  The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA..."

I'm still holding out hope that maybe, just maybe, they did grab a sample on the 30th and the two Tims took off to get that to the FBI labs here at home, and then Tim Miller went to Costa Rica.

Is that even still plausible?



I really don't think so - and this is why.

When Beth was made aware of the full scope of things last September, she "needs time to digest it" and wanted to "share it with someone I trust".

That tells me the FBI never shared anything with her about DNA - positive or negative.

This was all news to her, and she was disturbed by it.

According to Kyle - the FBI said there were human remains in that cage.

I would have to presume that means the FBI did an analysis of the footage Kyle sent to them from the Dec 29th ROV dive, and came to that conclusion.

According to Kyle, there was nothing in the FBI report (that Mos read from in his presser) about DNA.

See...that's what I thought.

Doesn't make sense that Tim is talking about DNA.  I just can't figure that out.



I can't either.  It would be helpful if we knew who told that to Tim.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: johan555 on February 25, 2009, 10:23:50 AM
O/T

http://www.fox30online.com/news/local/story/Plane-Crash-in-Amsterdam/1ls8otBGFEKDIohF1pLi7Q.cspx

Plane Crash in Amsterdam

Last Update: 8:41 am 

Print Story | Email Story     

 AMSTERDAM (AP) - A local mayor says 9 people have been killed in the crash of a Turkish Airlines plane in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Officials say another 50 people were hurt when the plane crashed while attempting to land and broke into three pieces. There appears to have been no fire.

A Dutch reporter says the plane apeared to fall a couple of miles short of the runway of Amsterdam's main airport. The plane crashed in a field.

Turkish Airlines officials earlier said no one was killed among the 134 people aboard the plane, a Boeing 737-800.

There was no immediate word on what caused the crash, which happened in slightly misty weather with little wind.

 


(http://images2-telegraaf.nl/multimedia/archive/00609/crash_609089q.jpg)

(http://images2-telegraaf.nl/multimedia/archive/00608/Vliegtuigspannend_608957q.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 25, 2009, 10:24:38 AM

I just know I will never believe that after all the excitement on that ship over the trap, and everyone knowing that Tim Miller had called Dave, there is no way in hell they dove on it only once and for less than a minute on Dec. 30th to get a visual.


 ::MonkeyNoNo::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: caesu on February 25, 2009, 10:25:53 AM
Quote
Small scale no excuse for
corruption, says Bijleveld

THE HAGUE--The small scale of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba is no excuse for corruption or lack of transparency. Members of government on the islands have a great responsibility in the area of good governance, legal security and safeguarding of fundamental human rights and freedom.

Dutch State Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld-Schouten minced no words about it: Governments in the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba are not functioning well in a number of areas.

She sent a seven-page letter to the Second Chamber on Monday regarding the condition of the administrations in the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. The Dutch Parliament had asked for this update in June 2008 in an effort to determine whether the islands could comply with the conditions of constitutional reform.

In the letter to the Second Chamber, the State Secretary substantiated her concerns about the current administrations on the islands. She focused on the weaknesses of small scale that can become even more prominent in the future countries Curaçao and St. Maarten, and explained what measures she was taking to contribute to a better quality of government and to contain corruption.

Several investigations and cases on the islands have confirmed that there are weak spots in the administrations. Bijleveld-Schouten specifically mentioned the fraud at the St. Maarten Immigration Service involving Police Chief Commissioner Derrick Holiday and Commissioner Louie Laveist, who is being prosecuted for corruption and fraud.

Corruption cases are being tackled, but only with major input from the Netherlands in the form of deploying judges, prosecutors, and through the Royal Marechaussees and the Kingdom Detective Cooperation Team RST.

Members of government also have a responsibility, said Bijleveld-Schouten, noting that this group should take a more pro-active role to prevent an appearance of a conflict of interest situation or lack of transparency that could cast a shadow on government’s integrity.

She mentioned “the St. Maarten Commissioner who with her husband was involved in a foundation that received subsidy from a government-owned company. The company resorted under the Commissioner and her husband was a member of the board.”

Members of government lead by example in what they say and what they do. If they don’t set the right example, they can’t expect their civil servants to have integrity, said the State Secretary.

The small scale aspect of islands and the fact that it concerns relatively young democracies is no excuse for corruption or lack of transparency in government. “That is why improvement of the quality of the administrations and the tackling of corruption are priorities in my policy,” said Bijleveld-Schouten.

She has a three-prong approach: by setting conditions in the constitutional process, by giving support, and by reminding members of government of their responsibilities. If she suspects wrongdoing on the part of the latter group, she informs the local Prosecutor’s Office.
http://www.thedailyherald.com/news/daily/l238/corruptl238.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 25, 2009, 10:28:41 AM
In addition to the very good points made regarding Tim Trahan and running out of air....

Does that also not lead to the questions:

What about the Aruban divers that were there?

Did they surface the same time as Trahan?

Was their view also limited by the large skate?

If yes - then WHY would Aruba have been so dead set in their stance of "it's not case related"?

And WHY would John Silvetti have bought into that - hook, line, and sinker?

How could ANYONE have known by an admittedly visually obscured, brief dive?

And yet - that's precisely what Aruba and Silvetti did.  Move on, nothing to see here folks.



There's an awful lot about that day that we don't know yet, imo.

I woke up thinking about the quote from Tim Miller on Greta Van Sustern's FoxNews show, On The Record on 2/26/08:

"Tim:  The report we got is the DNA that came back did not match Natalee's DNA..."

I'm still holding out hope that maybe, just maybe, they did grab a sample on the 30th and the two Tims took off to get that to the FBI labs here at home, and then Tim Miller went to Costa Rica.

Is that even still plausible?



I really don't think so - and this is why.

When Beth was made aware of the full scope of things last September, she "needs time to digest it" and wanted to "share it with someone I trust".

That tells me the FBI never shared anything with her about DNA - positive or negative.

This was all news to her, and she was disturbed by it.

According to Kyle - the FBI said there were human remains in that cage.

I would have to presume that means the FBI did an analysis of the footage Kyle sent to them from the Dec 29th ROV dive, and came to that conclusion.

According to Kyle, there was nothing in the FBI report (that Mos read from in his presser) about DNA.

See...that's what I thought.

Doesn't make sense that Tim is talking about DNA.  I just can't figure that out.



I can't either.  It would be helpful if we knew who told that to Tim.

I don't think anybody told Tim that there was DNA.  I heard him say it... and I think he
mis-spoke.  I think he meant to say remains.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 10:32:52 AM

I just know I will never believe that after all the excitement on that ship over the trap, and everyone knowing that Tim Miller had called Dave, there is no way in hell they dove on it only once and for less than a minute on Dec. 30th to get a visual.


 ::MonkeyNoNo::




I agree!!!!!

Silvetti mentioned "several dives" Underwater Expeditions did with Aruban divers for inspection and collection of samples.

I just don't think any human remains were ever sent to the FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on February 25, 2009, 10:34:22 AM


I don't think anybody told Tim that there was DNA.  I heard him say it... and I think he
mis-spoke.  I think he meant to say remains.

That's a very good possibility Magnolia.

Was he referring to the fabric, while thinking remains.........and it came out DNA?

Definitely a possibility.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 25, 2009, 10:39:37 AM


I don't think anybody told Tim that there was DNA.  I heard him say it... and I think he
mis-spoke.  I think he meant to say remains.

That's a very good possibility Magnolia.

Was he referring to the fabric, while thinking remains.........and it came out DNA?

Definitely a possibility.

Yes!  DNA had not been mentioned before.  It was obvious confusion on Tim's part.
Confusion that is understandable.
At that point all that had been talked about was the fabric, I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 25, 2009, 10:40:01 AM
Good morning, all. 

Getting close to a new cage.  Then I can finish reading here.    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #802 2/21/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 25, 2009, 10:41:31 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/MODLOCK1.gif)

Please move to NCD# 803

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4584.0