Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:00:02 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:00:02 AM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)

THERE IS TO BE NO POSTING OF ADDRESSES OR DISCUSSION OF CONTACTING ANY WITNESSES IN THIS CASE.  ANY CONCERNS WE MAY HAVE REGARDING THE WITNESSES RELOCATING TO THE UNITED STATES WILL BE SENT TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 07:28:41 PM
Has anyone been watching the site meter recently to see if the son of the ditch is reading here from Holland or from Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:29:03 PM
Whew, that was just in the nick of time!  I fear I will soon be in Lala's book!  I hear her pencil sharpener now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:29:34 PM
Good idea.  I'll take a look see.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 07:30:07 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Has anyone been watching the site meter recently to see if the son of the ditch is reading here from Holland or from Aruba?

There has been someone reading from Aruba all day long and from the Netherlands there have been about 5 various locations.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 07:31:05 PM
Two thumbs up to AZ and San.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:32:37 PM
All I see is Jamaica and ? Unknown Country.  Hmm...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:33:38 PM
Good catch, San.  I don't see them there now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 07:34:53 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Good catch, San.  I don't see them there now.

They were there earlier.  I would say less than an hour ago.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 07:35:51 PM
How about Rotterdam Zuid Holland?   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:36:27 PM
Shout out to Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland and  71.75.240.#  Unknown Country.  How's the weather there today?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 07:36:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Has anyone been watching the site meter recently to see if the son of the ditch is reading here from Holland or from Aruba?

There has been someone reading from Aruba all day long and from the Netherlands there have been about 5 various locations.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/bingo2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 07:37:56 PM
JORAN - DID YOU GO TO SCHOOL ON MAY 30, 2005?  What were you doing all day?  HUH?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 07:38:27 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
All I see is Jamaica and ? Unknown Country.  Hmm...

I saw China, Venezuela, Australia, Germany, Israel.  I think there was Antigua too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:40:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
All I see is Jamaica and ? Unknown Country.  Hmm...

I saw China, Venezuela, Australia, Germany, Israel.  I think there was Antigua too.


I looked at Location and Who's On.  Where were you looking?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 07:45:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN - DID YOU GO TO SCHOOL ON MAY 30, 2005?  What were you doing all day?  HUH?

I am open to the possibility that Joran did go to school on monday and Paulus is playing dumb because...

1) It's the how he got to school, or the when that is a problem.

2) It muddies up his other non-answers to make them seem less important.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:49:56 PM
I am under the impression that he did go to school, also, but he went late and Paulus or someone else took him.  Paulus recognized that Joran's best alibi would to be seen at school on Monday.  Joran, however, was so exhausted from his nightly activities that he slept much of the day.  

The students also reported that he bragged to them about having sex with Natalee and her drowning and hitting her head.  This was when the Headmaster called Anita to tell her to shut him up.  Was this on Tuesday or later?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Florida on October 22, 2006, 07:54:01 PM
(Tues-) Paulus:

I cannot remember what I did when I got home. I think that Joran
went to bed and that I worked a little in the garden  
and then started preparing dinner. I informed Anita about what
had taken place. That night I went to bed early.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 07:55:52 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
(Tues-) Paulus:

I cannot remember what I did when I got home. I think that Joran
went to bed and that I worked a little in the garden  
and then started preparing dinner. I informed Anita about what
had taken place. That night I went to bed early.

Someone saw him digging?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 07:56:33 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
I am under the impression that he did go to school, also, but he went late and Paulus or someone else took him.  Paulus recognized that Joran's best alibi would to be seen at school on Monday.  Joran, however, was so exhausted from his nightly activities that he slept much of the day.  

The students also reported that he bragged to them about having sex with Natalee and her drowning and hitting her head.  This was when the Headmaster called Anita to tell her to shut him up.  Was this on Tuesday or later?


PVDS June 23:
To your question how it then is possible that I had not seen Joran
get onto the bus, I can state the following. Of course I see the children
get onto the bus and that also is true for Joran. But unlike Valentijn and
Sebastian who went with the bus everyday Joran didn't go with the bus
once or twice during that period. But I do not remember exactly which
days he did not go with the bus. It could be that it was that Monday.
Most likely I informed the bus driver that Joran would not be going with
the bus. A clue to the fact that Joran did not go to school that Monday
could be that on Tuesday I insisted that he went to school that day.



His father says he did not go to school that day. Really?  Then where did we get the story about his classmates teasing him and such?  From Renfroe? Is it in writing from an interview or does anyone know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 07:57:18 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
(Tues-) Paulus:

I cannot remember what I did when I got home. I think that Joran
went to bed and that I worked a little in the garden  
and then started preparing dinner. I informed Anita about what
had taken place. That night I went to bed early.


You know, Paulus does not strike me as a gardener.  From the photos I've seen, the yard is overrun with weeds and the plants are not in good shape.  Paulus working in the garden is an odd enough visual picture as to make one go "hmmm...."

I wonder what he was burying in the flowers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 08:01:12 PM
If the dirt is disturbed and freshly turned, Paulus was working in the garden.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 08:03:30 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
All I see is Jamaica and ? Unknown Country.  Hmm...

I saw China, Venezuela, Australia, Germany, Israel.  I think there was Antigua too.


I looked at Location and Who's On.  Where were you looking?

I looked under World Map.  When it brings the map up it gave me red, green and white dots all over the country and the world.  When I put my curser near the dot it told me the location of where they were.  There is someone right now from:
State/Region:  Zuid-Holland
City:  Delft


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 08:04:31 PM
If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 08:04:50 PM
Joran says he went to school and daddy says he didn't.

Joran June 14:
At approximately 08.00 am, I arrived at school on the bus. I had slept the entire time the bus took to get to school.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 08:06:59 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.

Paulus would trust Jan Van der Straaten.  Now how do we know evidence was buried?  He could have given it to someone to hold that we would never think of.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 08:07:03 PM
San, I checked the map too.  I saw Delft and another Holland location in the last 10 minutes or so.  Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 08:08:15 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.

Paulus would trust Jan Van der Straaten.  Now how do we know evidence was buried?  He could have given it to someone to hold that we would never think of.


I don't think Paulus would trust personal items with anyone else.  And, remember, he worked in the garden on Tuesday.  Very odd.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: AZLady on October 22, 2006, 08:09:36 PM
I'm off to find some dinner and watch Kimberly Guilfoyle at 6 pm.  Talk to you Monkeys later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 08:13:27 PM
Quote from: "San"
State/Region:  Zuid-Holland

Haven't looked at the World Map in a long time, but last summer there were two ips from Boxtel that would read the discussion thread every night. Boxtel being the homebase for the Sweatyrunningman.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 08:24:24 PM
Does anyone remember where the story of Joran being picked up at Lorenzo's originated?  Tell it wasn't Renfroe. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 08:25:27 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone remember where the story of Joran being picked up at Lorenzo's originated?  Tell it wasn't Renfroe. :roll:

My guess would be RWV but I could be wrong.  Maybe Tylergal will remember.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 08:26:45 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone remember where the story of Joran being picked up at Lorenzo's originated?  Tell it wasn't Renfroe. :roll:

Dave/Art Wood, IIRC.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 08:27:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone remember where the story of Joran being picked up at Lorenzo's originated?  Tell it wasn't Renfroe. :roll:


Can we really tell if any story from that dirty little island didn't originate from  Renfro and AVDS?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 08:27:49 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.

Paulus would trust Jan Van der Straaten.  Now how do we know evidence was buried?  He could have given it to someone to hold that we would never think of.


I've also heard from across the ocean that Paulus buried things in the cistern and capped it over, for whatever it's worth - quite some time ago I might add.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 08:28:33 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "San"
State/Region:  Zuid-Holland

Haven't looked at the World Map in a long time, but last summer there were two ips from Boxtel that would read the discussion thread every night. Boxtel being the homebase for the Sweatyrunningman.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: sweatyrunningman


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 08:33:16 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
sunfreak, where did Joran get those inherent antisocial traits?  His father?  His mother?  Who else had a temper so bad in the family that he might have fashioned his own after?  Who was responsible for all their problems in the Netherlands?  Who was a failed judge and why?  We do not know why.  It could have been related to his violent tendencies.  We cannot get enough information from this press-free country, whose only oracle is Julia Renfro, who has the ability to build mountains of lies in one single TV program.


I'm not defending Paulus or Anita by any means, but there is no proof that the vd Sloots had any problems in the Netherlands other than Paulus delaying the road thru his property in Boxtel. Anything else is speculation, unless you have other information.

I agree that there had to be dysfunction within the vd Sloot family, afterall, what family doesn't have some form of dysfunction in it? I also agree that part of Joran's problem was the pemissivity & lack of parental supervision, maybe even directly related to Paulus being absent during his quest to become a judge.  But I also believe it was the socials mores in Aruba that contributed to Joran's sense of entitlement, disregard for the value of the opposite sex and the fact that Aruba is so lax in its laws.

Sociopathy usually can be related to the circumstances of environment, but psychopathy is inborn and not learned behavior.  

I believe that Joran is a true psychopath and is the one who killed Natalee.  I think Anita & Paulus failed their child in getting help for him, and have been covering up for him for a long time, including what happened to Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 08:35:35 PM
9PM - EITHER OR BOTH

DANA PRETZER - Special Guest Carmen Mercer VP Of The Minute Man Project

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/10/22/the-dana-pretzer-show-special-guest-carmen-mercer-vp-of-the-minute-man-project/


OR

FOX - THE LINEUP 9PM

DAVE HOLLOWAY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 08:42:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone remember where the story of Joran being picked up at Lorenzo's originated?  Tell it wasn't Renfroe. :roll:


I do know that Miss Idaho told Greta that a a phone call was made from the sonofaditch phone or the dithc's phone to an area where steve croes stayed with his father approximately 6:40 a.m. that Monday and she said that the sonofaditch went to school and maxed his tests.  Some students stated on RWV that he went to school, was late, had scratches and a teacher took pictures of them where he had the scratches.  The teacher later went to Ethiopia.  Also other students said he had no tests and slept in the aisles all day where as Miss Idaho said he maxed his tests taht day. From school records, we found the only tests given that day were the APT's which Joran took one, the English exam, on which he scored a 5.  AzLady can tell you what a 2 on that test means --- failure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 08:43:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone remember where the story of Joran being picked up at Lorenzo's originated?  Tell it wasn't Renfroe. :roll:

My guess would be RWV but I could be wrong.  Maybe Tylergal will remember.


Anna might recall but it seems to me that Maria of Aruba (whatever her name was, phony names they used) is the one who told that but I could be mistaken.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 08:45:25 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "San"
State/Region:  Zuid-Holland

Haven't looked at the World Map in a long time, but last summer there were two ips from Boxtel that would read the discussion thread every night. Boxtel being the homebase for the Sweatyrunningman.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: sweatyrunningman


Maria was the one who at RWV told us that Natalee's body was limed so it would not smell.  Maria was all pro-Beth & Natalee until the powers that be got to her.  She is a shopkeeper and has real property that she rents, so I am sure the handwriting was coming down from somewhere when she made the switch from lightness to dark, maybe it was Scubajap who threatened to take her out without a SCUBA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 08:47:25 PM
Sunfreak-

Paulus did a bit worse than just delaying the  construction of a highway away from the school children involving a piece of his family's property, quite a few children were killed trying to cross that roadway during the nearly five year the sweatyrunningman worked to jack up the price on his land due to the duress.

I won't excuse him for that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 08:48:06 PM
Sunfreak, I do have some information that is not favorable to Paulus' tenure in Holland, but I will not share that on an open forum, because I do not know if it is true or not, so to query where Joran might have gotten these characteristics, is not divulging what I have been told that might/might not be true.  We have nothing to say that information is not true or is true, but a brother lives in Spain.  That is all I am going to say, but there is big money in Holland that is protecting the people of the Ditch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: scared-tom on October 22, 2006, 08:48:38 PM
Dana will be starting shortly.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com:8000/listen.pls

use this link to listen.,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 08:49:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
9PM - EITHER OR BOTH

DANA PRETZER - Special Guest Carmen Mercer VP Of The Minute Man Project

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/10/22/the-dana-pretzer-show-special-guest-carmen-mercer-vp-of-the-minute-man-project/


OR

FOX - THE LINEUP 9PM

DAVE HOLLOWAY


Well... I am going to multitask and do both!  I had emailed Dana after the Columbia incident and asked if we could get a MM interview....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 08:49:21 PM
hey Tom, can we plan on you calling in sometime soon?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 08:52:21 PM
Tom
Are you still here?  I have a question for you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 08:52:58 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Tom
Are you still here?  I have a question for you.


Let me guess..why is the clock in the forum behind by 9 minutes,  LOLOL :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 08:53:32 PM
Hey y'alll they didn't mention Dave...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: scared-tom on October 22, 2006, 08:56:54 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
hey Tom, can we plan on you calling in sometime soon?


I was on  a couple of weeks ago with Dana, but probably will call in again in the near future.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on October 22, 2006, 08:57:19 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey y'alll they didn't mention Dave...


 I was wondering if I missed sumpin.. I didnt hear him mentioned either.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 08:58:08 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey y'alll they didn't mention Dave...


 I was wondering if I missed sumpin.. I didnt hear him mentioned either.


So I am listening to Dana .... and waiting with the TV on mute....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: scared-tom on October 22, 2006, 08:58:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Tom
Are you still here?  I have a question for you.


Let me guess..why is the clock in the forum behind by 9 minutes,  LOLOL :lol:


yes, I am ...

re the clock, I have reset it on the server, but it will not take effect until the next reboot. We have been very stable recently, crossing fingers and toes, so the server has not had to be rebooted, so the time has not changed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:00:46 PM
Quote from: "scared-tom"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
hey Tom, can we plan on you calling in sometime soon?


I was on  a couple of weeks ago with Dana, but probably will call in again in the near future.


Well dern TOM... you should call in more.... I know that you have things to say... :wink:  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 09:01:41 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Sunfreak, I do have some information that is not favorable to Paulus' tenure in Holland, but I will not share that on an open forum, because I do not know if it is true or not, so to query where Joran might have gotten these characteristics, is not divulging what I have been told that might/might not be true.  We have nothing to say that information is not true or is true, but a brother lives in Spain.  That is all I am going to say, but there is big money in Holland that is protecting the people of the Ditch.


This is why I keep saying that we are looking for help from Holland in vain. The sad part is that Beth is thinking they will help her, and I just don't see it as a realistic hope. It is almost like she is grasping for any straw she can latch onto at this point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 09:02:04 PM
Sorry I missed your previous call Tom.....hopefully I'll catch the next one.

Mrs - I noticed no mention of Dave too, do you think he's in the "other stories" or this is just a misfire tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 09:02:53 PM
Yes Dave will be on she just mentioned it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 09:03:11 PM
ah the three amigos just flashed on FOX  so looks like some kind of blurb on their pursuit to be cleared?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:03:32 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Sunfreak, I do have some information that is not favorable to Paulus' tenure in Holland, but I will not share that on an open forum, because I do not know if it is true or not, so to query where Joran might have gotten these characteristics, is not divulging what I have been told that might/might not be true.  We have nothing to say that information is not true or is true, but a brother lives in Spain.  That is all I am going to say, but there is big money in Holland that is protecting the people of the Ditch.


This is why I keep saying that we are looking for help from Holland in vain. The sad part is that Beth is thinking they will help her, and I just don't see it as a realistic hope. It is almost like she is grasping for any straw she can latch onto at this point.


It is my hope that DeVries... who we hear doesn't mind shaking up the system can help.... or that along with friends... or that they have made a few enemies in so called high places...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on October 22, 2006, 09:03:57 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey y'alll they didn't mention Dave...


 I was wondering if I missed sumpin.. I didnt hear him mentioned either.



 K thye just said Dave will be on later., in regard to the 3 dips back in court on Nov 1st


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 09:04:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Tom
Are you still here?  I have a question for you.


Let me guess..why is the clock in the forum behind by 9 minutes,  LOLOL :lol:

You got it!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:05:16 PM
Dave and Beth are way patient... more than a lot of people would have been....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 09:06:39 PM
Quote from: "scared-tom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Tom
Are you still here?  I have a question for you.


Let me guess..why is the clock in the forum behind by 9 minutes,  LOLOL :lol:


yes, I am ...

re the clock, I have reset it on the server, but it will not take effect until the next reboot. We have been very stable recently, crossing fingers and toes, so the server has not had to be rebooted, so the time has not changed.


Thank you, thank you for the answer.  I was getting paranoid about living in the twilight zone.  I have this thing for punctuality.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 09:06:42 PM
tyler, it feels like it's been ages since I crossed paths with you!

Do you think that Holland presents a united front, or IS there a possibility of VDS enemies high up in the power structure? Do you have a reason to think that VDS has a problem with someone there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:07:25 PM
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 09:09:06 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey y'alll they didn't mention Dave...


 I was wondering if I missed sumpin.. I didnt hear him mentioned either.



 K thye just said Dave will be on later., in regard to the 3 dips back in court on Nov 1st


You have such a way with words.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:09:55 PM
Can anyone tell me what they are saying about Tara G that is watching FOx?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on October 22, 2006, 09:13:43 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey y'alll they didn't mention Dave...


 I was wondering if I missed sumpin.. I didnt hear him mentioned either.



 K thye just said Dave will be on later., in regard to the 3 dips back in court on Nov 1st


You have such a way with words.  :lol:


LOL Lalas.. I was being polite... I could say far worse.. but wouldnt want you to get out the muffs and your pencils.. ROFL!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:14:12 PM
OK... did I skeer everyone???   Even though i worked hard all day... I showered...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on October 22, 2006, 09:14:33 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Can anyone tell me what they are saying about Tara G that is watching FOx?


  Mrs Red.. no new news there either. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:15:29 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Can anyone tell me what they are saying about Tara G that is watching FOx?


  Mrs Red.. no new news there either. :(

another sad case.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:16:13 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....

Living in California and having worked in a hospital for almost 11 years I have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants.

Try going to an emergency room.  They use ER's for their doctors offices.  They get medical service for free.  They are using our system and most of the money they do earn gets sent back to Mexico.  Hospitals are having to close their doors because they are loosing so much money.  I could go on and on.  

I say build a wall, as tall and long as you can.  If they want to live in America, let them apply for legal residency.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 22, 2006, 09:16:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....

Living in California and having worked in a hospital for almost 11 years I have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants.

Try going to an emergency room.  They use ER's for their doctors offices.  They get medical service for free.  They are using our system and most of the money they do earn gets sent back to Mexico.  Hospitals are having to close their doors because they are loosing so much money.  I could go on and on.  

I say build a wall, as tall and long as you can.  If they want to live in America, let them apply for legal residency.



JACKPOT  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:17:05 PM
Quote from: "sb"
tyler, it feels like it's been ages since I crossed paths with you!

Do you think that Holland presents a united front, or IS there a possibility of VDS enemies high up in the power structure? Do you have a reason to think that VDS has a problem with someone there?


Hi, Sb, I have missed all of you.  I think we all know that the Lord musta loved the little man because he made so many of them, and I think that is what Beth is clinging to, the little man, because the little man can make a difference.  Ghandi proved that.  MLK proved that.  I think that is Beth's best hope and pressure is pressure and when it starts coming from the little man (there are so many of them), things happen.  I am very happy she has this opportunity and if she did not take advantage of it, she would always wonder if she had not, could she have made a difference.  I continue praying, as I know you do too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Frijole on October 22, 2006, 09:18:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....

Living in California and having worked in a hospital for almost 11 years I have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants.

Try going to an emergency room.  They use ER's for their doctors offices.  They get medical service for free.  They are using our system and most of the money they do earn gets sent back to Mexico.  Hospitals are having to close their doors because they are loosing so much money.  I could go on and on.  

Oh that would be one of my hot buttons too!  Being self employed and having been thrown under the "health care bus"... I pay a small fortune while these guys skate.  Pisses me off so bad I could spit nails.  

I say build a wall, as tall and long as you can.  If they want to live in America, let them apply for legal residency.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:18:56 PM
Klaasend... very well said... I agree.

Tyler, I am hoping and praying right along with you....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:19:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....

Living in California and having worked in a hospital for almost 11 years I have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants.

Try going to an emergency room.  They use ER's for their doctors offices.  They get medical service for free.  They are using our system and most of the money they do earn gets sent back to Mexico.  Hospitals are having to close their doors because they are loosing so much money.  I could go on and on.  

I say build a wall, as tall and long as you can.  If they want to live in America, let them apply for legal residency.


It's been so long since they saw a wasp in the ER in our area, they put out a warrant for arresting them when they show up, as if they were from Mars or something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: BTgirl on October 22, 2006, 09:21:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....

Living in California and having worked in a hospital for almost 11 years I have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants.

Try going to an emergency room.  They use ER's for their doctors offices.  They get medical service for free.  They are using our system and most of the money they do earn gets sent back to Mexico.  Hospitals are having to close their doors because they are loosing so much money.  I could go on and on.  

I say build a wall, as tall and long as you can.  If they want to live in America, let them apply for legal residency.


Klaas,

I totally agree with you. I live near an area that has been completely overwhelmed by illegal immigrants. The school system and health care facilities are all struggling. Most of them don't pay any taxes, but they use all the services provided by taxpayer dollars. The children they have here are almost all using medicaid and WIC services as well. I don't think the children of illegal immigrants should automatically be citizens.

I'm in favor of that wall also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 09:22:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OK... I have to say that I don't have any issue whatsoever with legal immigrants.... but I do have an issue with the whole illegal thing...

Carmen is interesting....


Sorry y'all I am multitasking.....

Living in California and having worked in a hospital for almost 11 years I have a HUGE problem with illegal immigrants.

Try going to an emergency room.  They use ER's for their doctors offices.  They get medical service for free.  They are using our system and most of the money they do earn gets sent back to Mexico.  Hospitals are having to close their doors because they are loosing so much money.  I could go on and on.  

I say build a wall, as tall and long as you can.  If they want to live in America, let them apply for legal residency.


It's been so long since they saw a wasp in the ER in our area, they put out a warrant for arresting them when they show up, as if they were from Mars or something.


I really just don't understand our government on this one, it's so obvious what 'the people' want done.

Apparently one of the more obvious failings of a 'representative' forum of government.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:22:55 PM
well what really irritates me is that somehow we are supposed think they deserve all of these benefits....

now granted I have seen quite a few hardworking illegals... but you know what?? working hard or not, they can do it legally!!!  BTW, I am pretty sure that Dana's guest is actually a legal immigrant.... I believe Carmen immigrated legally years ago...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 09:23:45 PM
Oranjestad, Aruba is now signed on :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:25:31 PM
Quote from: "San"
Oranjestad, Aruba is now signed on :D


Ditch, or sonofaditch?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:25:49 PM
Oh, I see K2 with their soft luggage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:27:21 PM
Then I hope Aruba hears that we still think that K2 and jvds...

ARE GUILTY....

and we will BOYCOTT until justice is done....

and no matter how hard they try to spin..... or make us BULL that she ran away..... we know better....


SO recap:
(1) THEY ARE GUILTY < IMO
(2) THE ISLAND WILL KEEP LOSING TOURISTS UNTIL THEY SOLVE THIS AND GIVE US ANSWERS!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:29:04 PM
Anybody listening to Fox?  It's on


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:30:31 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anybody listening to Fox?  It's on


i DID.... I wish Dave would say to ppl to come here and read the statements.... I would love for even more Americans to see how horrific....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:31:43 PM
I could solve this illegal problem.  Line them up, give them a gun, no matter if it is man or woman, send them to Iraq and if they maintain some degree of honorable service, they get their citizenship.  Draft should apply to all illegals, no holes barred, age 17 and up.  Tough about the kids.  We have American citizens where both parents serve.  Send the younguns to gramma.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:31:46 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anybody listening to Fox?  It's on


i DID.... I wish Dave would say to ppl to come here and read the statements.... I would love for even more Americans to see how horrific....


actually here and BFN....

Look at all the ppl that saw when Beth said that in HOlland.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:32:03 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/bingo2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: scared-tom on October 22, 2006, 09:32:25 PM
Dave is on with Dana right now


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 09:32:31 PM
Wow, Dave just hung up from Line Up and is already on Dana!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:32:33 PM
DAVE IS ON DANA>>>>NOW>>>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:33:27 PM
Dutch taking over the investigation, been on the island, some left.  What they have done, who they have talked to, we are not going to know....??? cannot hear.  Dave has a very mild demeanor and soft voice.  He needs to get him a big stick! and beat some folks up.

ANYONE KNOW IF THE KOENBURGERS are in anyway connected to Jossy?  I know Jossy has family in Atlanta.  Just makes me go hmmmmm.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 09:34:22 PM
David Kock said that was to release them as suspects since there is NOTHING GOING ON in the investigation.  He said it was like a sword hanging over their heads.  

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:34:55 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
David Kock said that was to release them as suspects since there is NOTHING GOING ON in the investigation.  He said it was like a sword hanging over their heads.  

.


It should stay there....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:35:10 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
David Kock said that was to release them as suspects since there is NOTHING GOING ON in the investigation.  He said it was like a sword hanging over their heads.  

.


They need to have that sword put to their throats.   :x  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on October 22, 2006, 09:36:05 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
DAVE IS ON DANA>>>>NOW>>>


What's he saying, I can't hear it tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 09:36:11 PM
Koch made it seem like it is the judges that are pushing this Nov. 1 court date, trying to make Janssen show her hand. Why would a judge do this on behalf of J2K? Is the judge also pushing for a status review for the SGs? Or any of the other suspects? Something is not right here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 09:37:01 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
David Kock said that was to release them as suspects since there is NOTHING GOING ON in the investigation.  He said it was like a sword hanging over their heads.  

.


They need to have that sword put to their throats.   :x  :x


Yes, what a terrible analogy.  I wanted to say well, let's DROP it as in onto their heads!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:37:21 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
DAVE IS ON DANA>>>>NOW>>>


What's he saying, I can't hear it tonight?


Down load WINAMP... it's free... and it's good....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:38:30 PM
SAN - are you doing a transcript of The Lineup?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:38:44 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Koch made it seem like it is the judges that are pushing this Nov. 1 court date, trying to make Janssen show her hand. Why would a judge do this on behalf of J2K? Is the judge also pushing for a status review for the SGs? Or any of the other suspects? Something is not right here.


maybe running a little scared.... I mean even the the darkside is worried about DeVries... supposedly he doesn't worry about who he shakes up....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 09:41:14 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Koch made it seem like it is the judges that are pushing this Nov. 1 court date, trying to make Janssen show her hand. Why would a judge do this on behalf of J2K? Is the judge also pushing for a status review for the SGs? Or any of the other suspects? Something is not right here.


Hi, Igs,
I have never seen a judicial system like this one.  It is TOTALLY FLAWED for how can one reasonably expect to ever obtain convictions with judges and ALE acting as a part of the defense team.

We even had members of the Prosecution (on vacation--sure!) present during the alleged search of just Joran's apartment.  

Do they not grasp the concept of conflict of interest and appearance of wrong doing?  

Or do they just not even care enough to put in even a good showing for us?  It is like a new slap in the face periodically from the judiciary and law enforcement.  What an insane system.  The Dutch law professors took it to task but we see that no one listened to them.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 09:42:15 PM
ok  Anna we need you to call.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:42:38 PM
Robots... call in!  LOL....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:42:51 PM
Toll free number 1-877-842-7884


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 09:43:24 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
ok  Anna we need you to call.......


Right after you, None. . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:44:34 PM
klaasend.... you call...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Sunfreak, I do have some information that is not favorable to Paulus' tenure in Holland, but I will not share that on an open forum, because I do not know if it is true or not, so to query where Joran might have gotten these characteristics, is not divulging what I have been told that might/might not be true.  We have nothing to say that information is not true or is true, but a brother lives in Spain.  That is all I am going to say, but there is big money in Holland that is protecting the people of the Ditch.


I said I wasn't defending Paulus.  I think Paulus is scum on the feet of cockroaches. I was making the point that Joran's tendencies as a psychopath are not learned.  Are psychopaths sociopaths?  Most are b/c they share many common traits. Generally sociopaths are products of their environment.  But being a psychopath does not make one necessarily a socoiopath, or vice versa.  The same goes for antisocial behavior disorder. While Paulus has traits of antisocial behavior disorder, he doesn't seem to have the criteria to label him a sociopath.  According to Dave, Paulus had tears in his eyes when Dave said to him that he could forgive if what happened to Natalee was an accident.  Then Paulus said he would do anything to protect his son.  A lot of fathers would do anything to protect their sons, especially if Paulus has done that many times before and knows what Joran is.  Then again, a lot of fathers would do the right thing for society and for their own son, and help get him off the street so he doesn't kill again and to get him the mental help he needs.

I'm not defending the Kalpoe's mom either, but when she said, "Come on, we all lie. We all lie. As big people I know that I lie sometimes." I tend to agree with her.  Lies=fibs=white lies.  Even our sex-addicted POTUS lied to the whole nation.

Like I said earlier, I'm not making excuses for anyone in Aruba who played a part in Natalee's disappearance or coverup of the same.  I just don't believe one can totally blame the actions of the child on the parents.
To make my point clearer, here in Atlanta we have a case where a teenager trying to commit suicide after being jilted by her female friend. She deliberately drove her car at a high rate of speed into an oncoming car.  She survived, but the woman of the other car was killed and her child injured.  Are her parents to blame for her actions?  I think her parents are partially to blame, in that they provided the car to the girl and failed to recognize or do anything about the girl's depressive/suicidal tendencies. But at the same time you can't blame the parents for the girl committing suicide anymore than you can blame a talk show host when a guest commits suicide. They may have contributed to the burden, but they didn't cause the person to take their own life.

Paulus & Anita didn't cause Joran to kill his dog and they didn't cause Joran to rape girls & murder Natalee, imo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:45:18 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
klaasend.... you call...

I'm really not feeling all that good today, would rather not call.  Think I caught whatever Red has...LOLOLOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:46:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
klaasend.... you call...

I'm really not feeling all that good today, would rather not call.  Think I caught whatever Red has...LOLOLOL  :lol:


GOSH I hope not... he's not even being a good sick person now.... but he is so incredibly ill.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:49:09 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
klaasend.... you call...

I'm really not feeling all that good today, would rather not call.  Think I caught whatever Red has...LOLOLOL  :lol:


GOSH I hope not... he's not even being a good sick person now.... but he is so incredibly ill.....

Maybe it's time to go to either the doctor or the ER?  He's been sick a few days now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 09:49:37 PM
Sunfreak-

I wasn't challenging you with my post regarding the truth of Boxtel Freeway, I thought perhaps you didn't have the full story, that's all. I do think the parents of Joran avoided disciplining him and as a parent, I know what that entails and of a "sporter" physically larger than you are. It's not easy, it requires you be very hands-on and persistent and consistent. If we don't start holding some parents accountable I fear our society will have increasing problems.

I also think highly of you and your opinions, so hopefully we can agree to disagree on parts of this and agree on others?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 09:49:55 PM
Quote from: "sb"
tyler, it feels like it's been ages since I crossed paths with you!

Do you think that Holland presents a united front, or IS there a possibility of VDS enemies high up in the power structure? Do you have a reason to think that VDS has a problem with someone there?


I'd like to throw in my 2 cents on that. Paulus was dismissed as a judge-in-training.  If he was/is all that powerful in the NL, I don't believe that would have happened.  And surely he has enemies or at least people who dislike him after him stalling that road in Boxtel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on October 22, 2006, 09:52:27 PM
Hiya Monkeys

Whoever was visiting from Oranjestad was reading PVDS statement on the front page. Wonder who?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:53:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
klaasend.... you call...

I'm really not feeling all that good today, would rather not call.  Think I caught whatever Red has...LOLOLOL  :lol:


GOSH I hope not... he's not even being a good sick person now.... but he is so incredibly ill.....

Maybe it's time to go to either the doctor or the ER?  He's been sick a few days now.


He has until tomorrow.... then off to the doctor !!

I have lived in Maine too long... I just heard myself say yep....  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Tylergal on October 22, 2006, 09:53:58 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Whoever was visiting from Oranjestad was reading PVDS statement on the front page. Wonder who?????


Probably PVDS, so he could remember what story he told that time. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:55:05 PM
Mrs. Red - what would be the proper southern term instead of YEP?   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 09:56:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Whoever was visiting from Oranjestad was reading PVDS statement on the front page. Wonder who?????


Probably PVDS, so he could remember what story he told that time. :wink:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/PVDScartoon1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 09:56:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Mrs. Red - what would be the proper southern term instead of YEP?   :lol:


I think... uh.huh...

when I first moved here, and people would say yep.. I thought OMG that is SOOOO rude.... and now I am right there...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 09:56:16 PM
Quote from: "Anna"

Hi, Igs,
I have never seen a judicial system like this one.  It is TOTALLY FLAWED for how can one reasonably expect to ever obtain convictions with judges and ALE acting as a part of the defense team.

Anna, it certainly looks that way. You would think that with just the info that we do have on J2K, the statements...etc...that alone would be enough for them to remain suspects. Now we have a judge trying to accelerate the process for them? It appears that the judge is telling KJ that she must raise the evidentiary bar in order to keep them as suspects, but Arlene never told us about that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 09:56:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Mrs. Red - what would be the proper southern term instead of YEP?   :lol:


yoohoo?  :lol: j/k


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 09:56:54 PM
I don't know specifics about the past life and character of PVDS. I have always been unwilling to think of him as a profligate teen skirt chaser.

Sometimes kids reflect the OPPOSITE of what their parents are, in reaction against what they see as being their parents' excesses. The preacher's daughter hits college age and works the streets, while the drunkard's son becomes a minister.

I see Joran kind of like that.

To be honest, I see PVDS as having all the character and personality of a slug under a rock. I see him as a great big "zero", devoid of any feelings or concepts about his behavior. I see him as being basically, unconcerned and just living out his life day by day with no drive or push to do anything excpt mark time. He's just... there. As a person, and as a parent.

The teenage reaction to a person like that would be to put the petal to the metal about EVERYTHING... gambling, drinking, sex, killing dogs, what have you. NO restraints.

I give you Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 09:57:42 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Sunfreak-

I wasn't challenging you with my post regarding the truth of Boxtel Freeway, I thought perhaps you didn't have the full story, that's all. I do think the parents of Joran avoided disciplining him and as a parent, I know what that entails and of a "sporter" physically larger than you are. It's not easy, it requires you be very hands-on and persistent and consistent. If we don't start holding some parents accountable I fear our society will have increasing problems.

I also think highly of you and your opinions, so hopefully we can agree to disagree on parts of this and agree on others?


Will have? That boat has already sailed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 10:00:26 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Hi, Igs,
I have never seen a judicial system like this one.  It is TOTALLY FLAWED for how can one reasonably expect to ever obtain convictions with judges and ALE acting as a part of the defense team.

Anna, it certainly looks that way. You would think that with just the info that we do have on J2K, the statements...etc...that alone would be enough for them to remain suspects. Now we have a judge trying to accelerate the process for them? It appears that the judge is telling KJ that she must raise the evidentiary bar in order to keep them as suspects, but Arlene never told us about that.


That's because their laws are like jello and will take on any shape they dream up.  With no jury system, to me this just looks like who is bribing the judge today routine.  One person should not be allowed to make these sorts of decisions alone.

Remember when Paulus and Anita held the top secret meeting with the judge right before Joran's release?  That kind of thing would be highly illegal in this country for it looks for all the world to me like they are just flatly being bribed to rule in favor of these suspects every time.

No one releases suspects with this much evidence against them until they are either cleared or the case solved.  No one except the FOP's (Friends of Paulus) in Aruba that is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 10:01:06 PM
Well carnut, last time I checked no one gave me a pass on parenting or being accountable. So I elect you to go round up a passle of these lazy apathetic parents and set them straight, ok?

I'm worn out  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 10:03:24 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"


I also think highly of you and your opinions, so hopefully we can agree to disagree on parts of this and agree on others?


I totally agree. If we didn't have different views on different things, life would be boring.  I love a good debate as long as it is respectful.  And ours was! Also differences of opinions stimulate our thinking and we all know that 2 heads are better than one, unless the 2 heads are on the same person.

Hugs to you, None.  I hope I didn't offend you or anyone else with my strong opinions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:03:24 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Well carnut, last time I checked no one gave me a pass on parenting or being accountable. So I elect you to go round up a passle of these lazy apathetic parents and set them straight, ok?

I'm worn out  :lol:


Sorry, I am too busy complaining about illegal aliens.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 10:04:38 PM
I hope this doesn't become a rant but it's something that really frustrates me so I'm going to toss it out here, make of it what you will.

Paulus was studying to be a judge, a keeper of laws and judgments in any given known society, namely Aruba and in our case the US. I expect a HIGHER standard from them, from a teacher too, such as his wife. So if a wannabe judge and special counsel to the Minister of Justice is afforded a pass on parenting, then what kind of statement is that regarding Aruba overall ????????

I personally feel Paulus played some poker of his own, he played his ACE, whatever that was it was enough to shut up an entire island.

rant over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 10:05:20 PM
none, I have seen great big strapping teenage boys who would backtalk dad and defy & challenge him openly... quail and cower like little sissies when Mama brings it down. Funniest thing I have ever seen how some boys get like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 10:05:40 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Hi, Igs,
I have never seen a judicial system like this one.  It is TOTALLY FLAWED for how can one reasonably expect to ever obtain convictions with judges and ALE acting as a part of the defense team.

Anna, it certainly looks that way. You would think that with just the info that we do have on J2K, the statements...etc...that alone would be enough for them to remain suspects. Now we have a judge trying to accelerate the process for them? It appears that the judge is telling KJ that she must raise the evidentiary bar in order to keep them as suspects, but Arlene never told us about that.


Maybe the judge is on the payola!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 10:06:06 PM
that was my rambling point with Dana..... that the island knows what happened...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 10:06:19 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I don't know specifics about the past life and character of PVDS. I have always been unwilling to think of him as a profligate teen skirt chaser.

Sometimes kids reflect the OPPOSITE of what their parents are, in reaction against what they see as being their parents' excesses. The preacher's daughter hits college age and works the streets, while the drunkard's son becomes a minister.

I see Joran kind of like that.

To be honest, I see PVDS as having all the character and personality of a slug under a rock. I see him as a great big "zero", devoid of any feelings or concepts about his behavior. I see him as being basically, unconcerned and just living out his life day by day with no drive or push to do anything excpt mark time. He's just... there. As a person, and as a parent.

The teenage reaction to a person like that would be to put the petal to the metal about EVERYTHING... gambling, drinking, sex, killing dogs, what have you. NO restraints.

I give you Joran.


SB,
There is some truth to what you say and likely a great deal thence the following expression and pre-made icon.  In some of the photos of Paulus looking admiringly at Joran I wonder if we have the case of the parent living vicariously through his son.

Now don't anybody jump on me, I didn't make this.  It is just an expression and one that has been around a very long time.
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/49gn37p_th.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:06:27 PM
Hey, mrs Red, Francis McDorman is on in 'Somethings Gotta Give' and she is sooooo different from the Cop Lady in 'Fargo'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 10:07:13 PM
Quote from: "sb"
none, I have seen great big strapping teenage boys who would backtalk dad and defy & challenge him openly... quail and cower like little sissies when Mama brings it down. Funniest thing I have ever seen how some boys get like that.


have you been talking to son?  :wink:   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:07:54 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I hope this doesn't become a rant but it's something that really frustrates me so I'm going to toss it out here, make of it what you will.

Paulus was studying to be a judge, a keeper of laws and judgments in any given known society, namely Aruba and in our case the US. I expect a HIGHER standard from them, from a teacher too, such as his wife. So if a wannabe judge and special counsel to the Minister of Justice is afforded a pass on parenting, then what kind of statement is that regarding Aruba overall ????????

I personally feel Paulus played some poker of his own, he played his ACE, whatever that was it was enough to shut up an entire island.

rant over.


Yes, the culture of that dirty little island has become quite vivid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 10:08:21 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
that was my rambling point with Dana..... that the island knows what happened...


yes they do, I was listening and appreciated you said it out loud !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 10:09:06 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Hey, mrs Red, Francis McDorman is on in 'Somethings Gotta Give' and she is sooooo different from the Cop Lady in 'Fargo'.


I really like her...she can do lots of different things...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 10:10:02 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
that was my rambling point with Dana..... that the island knows what happened...


yes they do, I was listening and appreciated you said it out loud !!


thanks, it wasn't eloquent, but it was heartfelt....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 10:10:11 PM
Quote from: "sb"
none, I have seen great big strapping teenage boys who would backtalk dad and defy & challenge him openly... quail and cower like little sissies when Mama brings it down. Funniest thing I have ever seen how some boys get like that.


SB,
I have that phenomenon and will tell you why.  I have three and they sort of like to best each other, scuffle around.  So if one is giving Mama any grief, the other two are just tickled to pummel him but good.  Salivating at the very thought of getting to legitimately do so, lol!

And they try to out do each other sometimes in being good to Mama as well.  Hope this carries over when they all have nice incomes, lol.  Their biggest scandal is to make Mama cry!!  

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 10:11:38 PM
Monkeys... I hate that I need to run out.. I have missed hearing y'alls thoughts the last couple of days...

but keep the faith... I do believe it moves mountains!

Nite y'all...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 10:11:49 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Hey, mrs Red, Francis McDorman is on in 'Somethings Gotta Give' and she is sooooo different from the Cop Lady in 'Fargo'.


I really like her...she can do lots of different things...


Didn't she win an award for her portrayal in Fargo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:13:21 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Hey, mrs Red, Francis McDorman is on in 'Somethings Gotta Give' and she is sooooo different from the Cop Lady in 'Fargo'.


I really like her...she can do lots of different things...


Didn't she win an award for her portrayal in Fargo?


Yep Best Actress in a Leading Role, 1997.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 22, 2006, 10:13:24 PM
Justin's = you will have your poster this week... if you email me tomorrow I will give you a tracking number...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 10:13:30 PM
Related to none's post...

Aruba is a small place with limited population. They sort of have to take what they can get when it comes to authority figures, not much to choose from. None of their candidates or officials really stand out as being towering figures of justice and morality.

If PVDS can't make the grade there, he ain't much.

WHAT would cause him to be bounced from consideration? He's certainly not the first official in the world whose kid painted the town red on weekends.

I think the whole "failed judge" thing is bogus. He was needed for some other duties and being a judge would have conflicted. I have always wondered what secrets the man holds.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 10:14:21 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Mrs. Red - what would be the proper southern term instead of YEP?   :lol:


yoohoo?  :lol: j/k


We might use the same word but when we get through with it, it has two syllables and so doesn't sound nearly as short.   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 10:19:12 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Maybe the judge is on the payola!

They were probably fighting with each other over who would get to take the next puddlejump from Curacao. Me Me !  Pick Me!  :arrow: $$$$$


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: igsigs on October 22, 2006, 10:22:06 PM
Did Dave say anything about the case on Dana? Is he still on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 10:22:47 PM
Conversely, I have seen I don't know how many teen girls who sass and backtalk Mom over every little thing, who just melt like candy on the dashboard whenever Dad wants them to do something.

I am convinced even very young kids (I mean like 2-3 years old) develop skills in "playing" the opposite gender by behavior toward parents, that later on transfers to their boy-girl dealings.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on October 22, 2006, 10:23:15 PM
BOC on a fly By! Hi monks anything on next weeks meeting at B'ham?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:24:28 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Conversely, I have seen I don't know how many teen girls who sass and backtalk Mom over every little thing, who just melt like candy on the dashboard whenever Dad wants them to do something.

I am convinced even very young kids (I mean like 2-3 years old) develop skills in "playing" the opposite gender by behavior toward parents, that later on transfers to their boy-girl dealings.


Ah, a budding behavioral Psychologist.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 10:24:50 PM
BOC... loose lips sink ships.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 10:25:13 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Maybe the judge is on the payola!

They were probably fighting with each other over who would get to take the next puddlejump from Curacao. Me Me !  Pick Me!  :arrow: $$$$$



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th3_3_2v.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 10:25:53 PM
Now carnut, you KNOW you agree with me though...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 10:26:35 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Related to none's post...

Aruba is a small place with limited population. They sort of have to take what they can get when it comes to authority figures, not much to choose from. None of their candidates or officials really stand out as being towering figures of justice and morality.

If PVDS can't make the grade there, he ain't much.

WHAT would cause him to be bounced from consideration? He's certainly not the first official in the world whose kid painted the town red on weekends.

I think the whole "failed judge" thing is bogus. He was needed for some other duties and being a judge would have conflicted. I have always wondered what secrets the man holds.


exactly! so what is in Paulus' little black book? I think the key to the whole mystery is there......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:27:12 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Now carnut, you KNOW you agree with me though...


Yes, most definitely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on October 22, 2006, 10:28:09 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Now carnut, you KNOW you agree with me though...


Email me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: justinsmama on October 22, 2006, 10:28:15 PM
To the evil ones at RU:

(http://files.tagworld.com/b84bdbde5bcc4e5cbb180580b7c2ff72.jpeg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:28:43 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
BOC on a fly By! Hi monks anything on next weeks meeting at B'ham?

BOC - regarding that meeting.  Some say it's secret and some say it's not.  In any case, it's not something we have discussed in this open forum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:31:39 PM
I think we all have known from the start the 'who' the 'what' and the 'how', the only real mystery is the 'why' of the coverup.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:32:24 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think we all have known from the start the 'who' the 'what' and the 'how', the only real mystery is the 'why' of the coverup.


ATA $$$


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:33:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think we all have known from the start the 'who' the 'what' and the 'how', the only real mystery is the 'why' of the coverup.


ATA $$$


If so, it sure has cost them a lot of those $$$$ so far.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:36:14 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think we all have known from the start the 'who' the 'what' and the 'how', the only real mystery is the 'why' of the coverup.


ATA $$$


If so, it sure has cost them a lot of those $$$$ so far.

I didn't say they were the sharpest knives in the drawer  :wink:  Look at Steve Cohen :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: justinsmama on October 22, 2006, 10:41:22 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Sunfreak, I do have some information that is not favorable to Paulus' tenure in Holland, but I will not share that on an open forum, because I do not know if it is true or not, so to query where Joran might have gotten these characteristics, is not divulging what I have been told that might/might not be true.  We have nothing to say that information is not true or is true, but a brother lives in Spain.  That is all I am going to say, but there is big money in Holland that is protecting the people of the Ditch.


Tyler, If you are comfortable with emailing me that info, I would like to read it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 22, 2006, 10:43:38 PM
Nice to see our board jumping again like this! I have been on several nights where I post and then sit back and listen to the crickets.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 10:46:32 PM
From The Line Up with Megyn Kendall - 10/22/06

David Kock on the Phone:

MK – What the point of going into court on this November 1st hearing and trying to get their names cleared?

DK – You know that was the date that was set by the judge because it’s been some time now that we already solicited the judge to instruct the DA either to proceed with the case and set the date for the trial or to dismiss the case.  Because these people cannot be held in that situation not knowing what is happening we’re about 17 months later and there are really no new developments in the case.

MK – But what’s the point I mean if they get some sort of official declaration that they are no longer suspects in the case what does it do for them.  Does it change their rights? What’s happening down there in Aruba at all?

DK – Yes well they can finally close the book on this issue and go on and of course there will be other consequences if somebody is investigated while no case is (I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT HE JUST SAID).  This thing is hanging like a sword on top of their head and it’s not going away.

MK – It doesn’t look like any charges are pending anytime soon from what we’ve heard.  Let me ask you this we’ve reported on the show last night that the Dutch Authorities have taken over the investigation of this case.  Why would the judge clear Deepak and Satish Kalpoes and Joran Van der Sloot for that matter now when fresh authorities are taking another look at this?

DK – You know it was very funny because we submitted our request some time ago and then all of a sudden Dutch Police are being involved.  To us it’s more of a reaction from the Aruba DA maybe to tell or pretend towards the judge that there is still something going on because we were suppose to have a hearing already the end of July/August.  I think based on this new Dutch investigation the judge wanted to give them some leeway and I think that’s why the date was set November 1st  like November 1st you have to come up with something because we can’t keep going on like this.

MK – Humm interesting.  Well we are obviously keeping our eyes posted on this case that has had our country riveted on this like you said 17 months now.


On the Phone Dave Holloway:

MK – You know let me ask you the same question that I just finished up with David.  Do you believe that these suspects might officially be cleared on November 1st when the Dutch authorities are taking a fresh look at it and hopefully the investigation is in a way starting a new?

DH – He mentioned something about funny that things happen that’s very coincidental that they are setting dates to get dismissed just when the Dutch are coming in and investigate it quite coincidental.  A lot of things have been coincidental in this case by the way.

MK – At this point I got to image you have next to no or no faith in the Aruba courts.  What do you expect to happen Dave what do you think this money is on.

DH – Well I would hope that they would not allow for them to be freed.  But if I was banking on it, based on what’s happened in the past it’s a possibility that they will be released.

MK – Dave is anything happening as far as you know in the case.  As I just mentioned and as you know the United States has been riveted to Natalee’s disappearance for over a year and a half now.  There were nightly updates on the case for so long but now it’s has fallen by the way side a bit in terms of the public eye.  Are you still on this case day to day in terms of leads it in the investigation or not so much anymore?

DH – Oh it stays on your mind every day you are always constantly thinking what happened.  You know your daughter went to Aruba for a four day vacation and all of a sudden she disappears and no one seems to know what happened.  You know a lot of circumstantial evidence is surrounding these three suspects and you know it’s just sad that this court date comes up on November 1st and it will be a sad day if they are all dismissed.

MK – Dave I know you believe they had something to do with Natalee’s disappearance.  What do you think happened?

DH – You know there are a lot of different theories out there Megyn you know I just really don’t know because I don’t have all the investigative material that the police have.  There are a lot of theories that these three suspects are directly involved and you know of course there is some other theories out there and I would be remised to give that out.

MK – Well hopefully time will tell Dave.  Thank you so much.  We’re praying you get some answers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on October 22, 2006, 10:46:41 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Nice to see our board jumping again like this! I have been on several nights where I post and then sit back and listen to the crickets.


You got Crickets? :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:50:00 PM
San - THANK YOU!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 10:51:06 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SAN - are you doing a transcript of The Lineup?

Oops sorry klaas I just saw this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:53:26 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
SAN - are you doing a transcript of The Lineup?

Oops sorry klaas I just saw this.


If you weren't transcribing it I was going to "steal" Heli's.. :lol:   Yours is much better than hers though.

Edited to add - yours is far more verbatim and complete..ha ha ha  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 10:53:42 PM
Well, geese folks, it's obvious why the judge is asking the DA to fish or cut bait, it comes from the PVDS suit for damages and was asked for earlier this summer.

DA had to do something to clear JVDS so the entire VDS clan could get damages because that's how PVDS filed the suit, not just for himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 10:57:18 PM
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 11:01:49 PM
Quote from: "San"
From The Line Up with Megyn Kendall - 10/22/06

David Kock on the Phone:


I don't believe a word David Koch says.  He is a paid mouthpiece for the suspects. He told us just this past spring that the boys would be charged and coming to trial this summer.  Oooh, I wonder if this was what he was talking about then.  More or less "poop or get off the pot".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Sue on October 22, 2006, 11:02:48 PM
Evening folks,
Finally caught up reading to much to comment about
But I did leave you a funny in the lounge on illigal immigration


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on October 22, 2006, 11:03:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 11:05:09 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals

That's what I was going to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:05:15 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals

Exactly.  There has to be a reason why we were lead to believe he was out of town with Anita while the MB kids were in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 11:06:05 PM
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on October 22, 2006, 11:07:43 PM
If all were lead to believe he wa in Holland then how could he possibly be on that rock? Always smoke & mirrors from that rock. IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:08:07 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Anna, it was very early on and it was posted by someone in Aruba in one of the blogs or forums.  It might have originated either here or at RWV.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 11:09:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Anna, it was very early on and it was posted by someone in Aruba in one of the blogs or forums.  It might have originated either here or at RWV.


Well, I know for sure it was discussed at RWV, but I still maintain it was one of the first explanations by JVDS in the Greta interview.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 11:12:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals

Exactly.  There has to be a reason why we were lead to believe he was out of town with Anita while the MB kids were in Aruba.


Yes, but he were told he was in town on that Sunday/Monday when she disappeared. We were told he went to the poker tourny with Joran.  Then we saw the casino shots.  Why was it important to cover Paulus's butt prior to the tournament?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 22, 2006, 11:13:28 PM
ARUBA, the Scum of the Earth

had no idea this was going to affect their paradise from hell island in the manner it has. some think the country and tourism is just fine, HA
what a load of BS that is.

but because they didnt realize it was going to be as bad as it is

they just kept going down and down and down and down

too far down the road to turn back, but they are so stupid they will drag the whole country down with them

aruba is not only EVIL but stupid as well


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 11:14:38 PM
.
Ah, Klaas,
I keep forgetting about the "decoys" too!

I have wondered if Paulus is also in charge of visas in any way.  Like the 400 illegal ones issued by Rudy Croes for the "exotic Dancers" as that might well be something the NL would frown upon in conferring on him the title of judge with such a thing in his record.

Wonder how much they charged for those in addition to the legal amount?  At $1000 apiece, well, we can all do the math.  And once in the system, it is likely Holland that would or could end up paying the bills on lots of these just as with illegals in this country.  Has to annoy the NL since Aruba rufuses to give an accounting of their funds, even those given by the NL to them.

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 11:16:22 PM
I think there has been only one reason for all the lies from the suspects, witnesses, Aruban spokespeople, & the darkside bloggers. To confuse the story so no one person can be found guity beyond a shadow of a doubt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 22, 2006, 11:17:41 PM
paulus is nothing but walking -talking -STALKING  LOAD of BS


paulus is a SWEAT MACHINE

its called NERVOUS from GUILT

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 22, 2006, 11:19:48 PM
i think the reason they have all the cash is because they STEAL it

they steal it at the poker tables

they use hand signals with dealers and their CRONIES at the tables

when you cheat at a poker table it is called STEALING in my book


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: nonesuche on October 22, 2006, 11:21:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals

That's what I was going to say.


Me too.

Thank you for the transcript San, off to bed with me, everyone rest well!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 11:24:45 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i think the reason they have all the cash is because they STEAL it

they steal it at the poker tables

they use hand signals with dealers and their CRONIES at the tables

when you cheat at a poker table it is called STEALING in my book


Deepak did report a tourist complaining that Joran was cheating the night the Alabama Delegation arrived.  I have wondered about that and about Guido being involved in some sort of scheme.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 11:25:02 PM
Quote from: "Anna"


Wonder how much they charged for those in addition to the legal amount?  At $1000 apiece, well, we can all do the math.  And once in the system, it is likely Holland that would or could end up paying the bills on lots of these just as with illegals in this country.  Has to annoy the NL since Aruba rufuses to give an accounting of their funds, even those given by the NL to them.


Why doesn't the NL just dump Aruba as one of their protectorates or whatever they call the Netherlands Antilles?  It seems Aruba is just shaming them and draining money from them.  I doubt if Aruba ever gave them one dime of the profits from tourism. Or perhaps tt's a symbiotic relationship and the NL needs them to tranship their drugs in & out, and launder their dirty money too.

What bothers me the most about Aruba's judicial system is that it is based on the one in the NL's which is also the basis of the world court.  Look at what happened in the Milosevic trial where they dragged their feet so long, the defendent died in prison.  But yet, they are trying to expedite this case for the vd Sloots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: justinsmama on October 22, 2006, 11:25:20 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Sunfreak-

I wasn't challenging you with my post regarding the truth of Boxtel Freeway, I thought perhaps you didn't have the full story, that's all. I do think the parents of Joran avoided disciplining him and as a parent, I know what that entails and of a "sporter" physically larger than you are. It's not easy, it requires you be very hands-on and persistent and consistent. If we don't start holding some parents accountable I fear our society will have increasing problems.

I also think highly of you and your opinions, so hopefully we can agree to disagree on parts of this and agree on others?


Will have? That boat has already sailed.


None and Car are right. It is literally a weary experience nearly every day in this household to set limits, and provide appropriate consequences when those limits are not adhered to by Justin. It would be easy to give in!  And God knows that there are times that I want to do so. I would be remiss as a parent should I take that route. I love my son too much to do that to him. He would suffer as an adult should I not do my job now. My youngest sister, the "baby" of our family, went through hell as a young adult from our father's permissiveness and our mother just being worn out by the time the fifth one hit adolesence. My sister found that the rest of the world expected far more of her than our parents did. She railed against those expectations for several years. Luckily, something must have been built into her foundation, as she finally saw the light and has been a responsible adult for a long while now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:25:46 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals

Exactly.  There has to be a reason why we were lead to believe he was out of town with Anita while the MB kids were in Aruba.


Yes, but he were told he was in town on that Sunday/Monday when she disappeared. We were told he went to the poker tourny with Joran.  Then we saw the casino shots.  Why was it important to cover Paulus's butt prior to the tournament?

Yes, but back in the beginning we were told he had just arrived back in Aruba around 4:40 or 5pm on May 29th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 22, 2006, 11:26:39 PM
LET me do a little TRANSLATING
 8)


To your question whether Joran went to school on Monday
May 30th 2005, I can state the following. I cannot precisely recollect
whether Joran went to school that day. It is possible that he did not
go to school that day.


"um,,,,errr.. ahhh....errrr  if i say he did not go to school that day it will look very bad for FRANKENJORAN if i say he did not go to school SO i will say that i cant remember much of anything"
 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:26:59 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Anna, it was very early on and it was posted by someone in Aruba in one of the blogs or forums.  It might have originated either here or at RWV.


Well, I know for sure it was discussed at RWV, but I still maintain it was one of the first explanations by JVDS in the Greta interview.

Just checked the Greta interview and he doesn't mention his dad, only lhis mom being in Holland.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 22, 2006, 11:28:17 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
i think the reason they have all the cash is because they STEAL it

they steal it at the poker tables

they use hand signals with dealers and their CRONIES at the tables

when you cheat at a poker table it is called STEALING in my book


Deepak did report a tourist complaining that Joran was cheating the night the Alabama Delegation arrived.  I have wondered about that and about Guido being involved in some sort of scheme.


YEP, dont try it in vegas

but in ARUBA when the whole casino is in on it against a bunch of Teenage tourists...

its like SHOOTING FISH in a BARREL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 11:30:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "klaasend"
So PAULUS was not in Holland with Anita.  WHY did someone make a point of making us think that he was?  Why was that important?


So we wouldn't connect him & his dirty old men's club pals

Exactly.  There has to be a reason why we were lead to believe he was out of town with Anita while the MB kids were in Aruba.


Yes, but he were told he was in town on that Sunday/Monday when she disappeared. We were told he went to the poker tourny with Joran.  Then we saw the casino shots.  Why was it important to cover Paulus's butt prior to the tournament?

Yes, but back in the beginning we were told he had just arrived back in Aruba around 4:40 or 5pm on May 29th.


Well, now just because PVDS statement says he stayed in aruba dosen't necessarily make it so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 11:31:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Anna, it was very early on and it was posted by someone in Aruba in one of the blogs or forums.  It might have originated either here or at RWV.


Well, I know for sure it was discussed at RWV, but I still maintain it was one of the first explanations by JVDS in the Greta interview.

Just checked the Greta interview and he doesn't mention his dad, only lhis mom being in Holland.


Ok, guess my memory fails me, sure thought I saw it there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 22, 2006, 11:31:59 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Quote from: "sb"
Nice to see our board jumping again like this! I have been on several nights where I post and then sit back and listen to the crickets.


You got Crickets? :oops:

I ate a cricket yeaterday. Crunchy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 22, 2006, 11:32:08 PM
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 11:33:51 PM
Quote from: "robots"

paulus is a SWEAT MACHINE

its called NERVOUS from GUILT

 8)


I think Paulus's sweating is why Aruba is flooding.  It's not rain, it's sweat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 22, 2006, 11:34:47 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Quote from: "sb"
Nice to see our board jumping again like this! I have been on several nights where I post and then sit back and listen to the crickets.


You got Crickets? :oops:

I ate a cricket yeaterday. Crunchy.

"yesterday"
Chirp.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:36:43 PM
Quote from: "San"
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE

Nite San!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 22, 2006, 11:37:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Anna, it was very early on and it was posted by someone in Aruba in one of the blogs or forums.  It might have originated either here or at RWV.


Well, I know for sure it was discussed at RWV, but I still maintain it was one of the first explanations by JVDS in the Greta interview.

Just checked the Greta interview and he doesn't mention his dad, only lhis mom being in Holland.


Ok, guess my memory fails me, sure thought I saw it there.


Geese it sure runs through my mind seeing JVDS explaining how he and pop got together before doing the casino run.

Sure thought JVDS said he met Dad at the airport without actually saying he drove to get him.

Maybe some other interview.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 22, 2006, 11:37:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"


Yes, but he were told he was in town on that Sunday/Monday when she disappeared. We were told he went to the poker tourny with Joran.  Then we saw the casino shots.  Why was it important to cover Paulus's butt prior to the tournament?

Yes, but back in the beginning we were told he had just arrived back in Aruba around 4:40 or 5pm on May 29th.


Isn't that what I wrote? That he was in Aruba for the tourny and the disappearance and asked why it was important to cover his butt prior to the tourny?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 22, 2006, 11:37:58 PM
I do remember thinking that Paulus returned from the NL on the Sunday at 4 pm. That was a long time ago that I read  /  heard that. I did look thru the Shizaru timeline and it isn't there.
So, it is not just me / or you that was under that impression.
Someone will know where they saw it. that World Jounier person has quite a bit of stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 22, 2006, 11:42:13 PM
Red and/or Klaas,

Thank you for posting the video of Beth today w/ Dr. Schuler (sp?). What a sweet yet strong lady.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on October 22, 2006, 11:42:31 PM
Could this have been when Paulus made his trip to Fl?

http://tinyurl.com/vvsgm

Author: Colleen (---.pitt.east.verizon.net)
Date:   07-03-05 22:29

Just got back from my first time in Aruba with my parents...it was amazing. We stayed at the Marriott which was fabulous. Although the media coverage for the Natalee Holloway story stayed there too along with Geraldo Rivera and Gretta Van Susteran. Natalee's mother was in our hotel a lot we actually saw her in the elevator and on the way to the airport we had an encounter with Paulus Van Der sloot. Whoever is going there in the upcoming weeks just keep your eyes open you will never know who you are going to see!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:44:54 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I do remember thinking that Paulus returned from the NL on the Sunday at 4 pm. That was a long time ago that I read  /  heard that. I did look thru the Shizaru timeline and it isn't there.
So, it is not just me / or you that was under that impression.
Someone will know where they saw it. that World Jounier person has quite a bit of stuff.

World Journer has it as a ?, as a rumor?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 11:47:45 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
[Why doesn't the NL just dump Aruba as one of their protectorates or whatever they call the Netherlands Antilles?  It seems Aruba is just shaming them and draining money from them.  I doubt if Aruba ever gave them one dime of the profits from tourism. Or perhaps tt's a symbiotic relationship and the NL needs them to tranship their drugs in & out, and launder their dirty money too.

What bothers me the most about Aruba's judicial system is that it is based on the one in the NL's which is also the basis of the world court.  Look at what happened in the Milosevic trial where they dragged their feet so long, the defendent died in prison.  But yet, they are trying to expedite this case for the vd Sloots.


Sunfreak,
The World Court is NOT based on Dutch law at all.  That is merely the location of the physical proceedings of the court the way the United Nations is in our country but we do not control it.

The World Court operates under International Laws and Treaties and those are established as a part of the UN and other international organizations.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 22, 2006, 11:51:46 PM
Information on The World Court:

http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/igeneralinformation/icjgnnot.html

Fortunately, it does not reflect the laws of any one country but rather international laws designated by the UN and various Treaties, etcf. Even the judges are from different countries and not the NL.  Has nothing to do with Dutch law.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 22, 2006, 11:56:15 PM
http://rjames.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-67.html
07-09-2005, 01:10 AM
I do not know the source of this timeline but here it is:

This is extremely long but someone did a very detailed timeline about Natalee's disappearance.

TIMELINE #5

Tuesday, May 24
.......................Natalee Holloway graduates *** laude (top 10%) #25 of 300 seniors from Mountain Brook HS
.......................Natalee & 5 MBHS friends put on matching silver wishbone necklaces as sign of their friendship

Wednesday, May 25
.......................Natalee’s cellphone is changed to international calling for trip to Aruba
.......................Phone set up to call US numbers from Aruba, but can’t call locally in Aruba when she’s there

Thursday, May 26
4:00 am?........Natalee, 123 MB kids from several schools & 7 chaperones meet for ride to airport
.......................Natalee takes NO credit card to Aruba, according to her mother Beth Twitty
???..................Natalee & MB group arrive in Aruba/check in at Holiday Inn SunSpree Resort.
.......................Hotel package all inclusive. Price includes room plus all meals and all drinks
.......................Natalee changes rooms once, ending up with 3 friends in room 7114 on ground floor
8:00 pm..........Soul Beach Festival casino party & after party @ Royal Cabana Casino
??? pm............Some MBHS students see Joran van der Sloot in Holiday Inn Excelsior Casino
.......................Joran gets into fight at casino with Natalee’s cousin Thomas Twitty, a football player

Friday, May 27
3:00 am.........Soul Beach after party ends
am-pm...........MBHS group go on all-day snorkling trip
???pm............MBHS Bryan Reynolds breaks up fight between Joran & MBHS kids @ Carlos’nCharlies’
7:00 pm.........Soul Beach Music Festival Night 1 at Entertainment Center
11:00 pm.......Soul Beach Festival Night 1 ends/After Party begins @ Havana Night Club

Saturday, May 28
4:00 am.........Soul Beach After Party ends
7:00 pm.........Soul Beach Music Festival Night 2 @ Havana Club Ampitheater
?? pm.............?Joran at Holiday Inn Casino gambling?
11:00 pm........Soul Beach Night 2 ends/after party begins @ Havana Night Club

Sunday, May 29
4:00 am.........Soul Beach after party ends
9:00 am.........Soul Beach daytime event @ Holiday Inn SunSpree Resort
10:00 am.........Natalee, ex-9th-grade-boyfriend Sean McVea & friends go to beach & pool all day, per NBC
3:00 pm.........Soul Beach daytime event ends
4:00 pm?........Joran, MB kids & Natalee’s cousin Thomas Twitty in poker tournament at Holiday Inn Casino
5:00 pm.........Paulus van der Sloot returns to Aruba from Holland
7:00 pm.........Soul Beach Festival Night 3 @ Havana Club Ampitheater/some MBHS attend?
8:00 pm?.......Natalee, in hotel room shared with 3 MB girls, packs luggage for Monday return to B’ham
........................Leaves cellphone, camera, purse & most of her money in room. Takes drivers license with her
8:30 pm.........Natalee & friends have dinner in Holiday Inn restaurant
8:30 pm?.......Joran finishes poker tournament & continues to gamble at Holiday Inn Casino with father Paul
9:30 pm.........Natalee & friends go to Holiday Inn Casino where Natalee meets Joran for first time
9:30 pm.........Friends see Joran & Natalee talking in casino
??? pm.........email says Deepak gets call from Joran to pick him up at home after gets off work
10:00 pm.........email says Deepak off work at Cyberzone Internet Cafe
........................sign on Cyberzone cafe door says closed @ 10 pm on Sundays (open till 11 pm M-Sat)
........................Satish driving Deepak’s car picks up his brother at Cyberzone & they go home to change
11:00 pm.........Natalee, 39 MBHS students & 2 chaperones go to Carlos’nCharlie’s
11:00 pm.........Soul beach festival ends (NO After Party this night)
11:00 pm.........Paul later tells police he picked up Joran at McDonalds near Holiday Inn to give him ride home
11:45 pm?.......Deepak & Satish Kalpoe pick up Joran at his house(??) & go to Carlos’nCharlies’


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 22, 2006, 11:58:41 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
I was hoping somebody would find record of Joran stating that he picked up Paulus at the airport, etc. as I am almost certain we hared that from a source of either Joran or Julia, one of the Sloot team.

Has to be to distance Paulus from such activities.  Wonder what went on the other nights Anita was away?


Anna, it was very early on and it was posted by someone in Aruba in one of the blogs or forums.  It might have originated either here or at RWV.


Well, I know for sure it was discussed at RWV, but I still maintain it was one of the first explanations by JVDS in the Greta interview.
[/b]
I am thinking that also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 12:03:08 AM
Maybe it is to prevent anyone from trying to find Paulus in things like the Casino vids for the other six nights?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 23, 2006, 12:05:48 AM
Quote from: klaasend
http://rjames.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-67.html
07-09-2005, 01:10 AM
I do not know the source of this timeline but here it is:

This is extremely long but someone did a very detailed timeline about Natalee's disappearance.
[SNIP]

Thursday, May 26
4:00 am?........Natalee, 123 MB kids from several schools & 7 chaperones meet for ride to airport
.......................Natalee takes NO credit card to Aruba, according to her mother

[SNIP]

This is odd. Why does it say 123 MB kids from several schools? There is only one high school in Mtn Brook. I don't think anybody other than Mtn Brook High kids went on the trip.

I wonder how accurate the rest of this timeline is?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 12:06:07 AM
What we know by my timeline post above is that the false rumor that Paulus had just arrived back in Aruba had already spread by July 9, 2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 23, 2006, 12:06:58 AM
I KNEW I needed to read PVDS statement. There is a lot of new stuff there.

I find it telling, and almost incontrovertible, that Joran WAS NOT IN SCHOOL ON MONDAY. I don't see how we can get anything else from that statement but that Joran MISSED that day. The headmaster was wrong about days and dates. Simple.

And THAT fact, says a great deal. There was a LOT of time to clean up any number of messes.

I also find the fact that Joran "won" $$$ and had his father deposit it VERY suspicious. 2 words: Money Laundering.

Joran came up with $$$ he couldn't account for, on Sunday night/Monday morning. Who says he won it? Is it a PAYOFF of some kind from someone outside?

Dad gave it "legitimacy" by depositing it himself.

Your thoughts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 12:07:53 AM
Yellow Ribbon - I doubt that it's accurate at all.  It's a compilation of articles and internet rumors.  I was just trying to find when the rumor of Paulus was started.  I'd love to see who originally posted the rumor as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 23, 2006, 12:11:59 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yellow Ribbon - I doubt that it's accurate at all.  It's a compilation of articles and internet rumors.  I was just trying to find when the rumor of Paulus was started.  I'd love to see who originally posted the rumor as well.


Sorry to pull you off topic. That error in the timeline was just one of those things that stood out to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 23, 2006, 12:15:56 AM
There were rumors at one time that a few kids from Georgia might have gotten in on the tour. Maybe from some small school that wanted to do an Senior Aruba trip, and being at the same time, they were probably put on the same plane.

I recall someone posting on unRiehl back then that they had some apocryphal info about the MB group that came from a niece who was on the plane with them and associated with them down there. If I recall it started a FIRESTORM because it made it sound like the MB kids conducted a nonstop Saturnalia of wild debauchery for 4 days. Really made them look bad. That person got booted off the site eventually. I always thought the info that person put out was the beginning of unRiehl's Descent into Darkness on this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 12:16:18 AM
Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yellow Ribbon - I doubt that it's accurate at all.  It's a compilation of articles and internet rumors.  I was just trying to find when the rumor of Paulus was started.  I'd love to see who originally posted the rumor as well.


Sorry to pull you off topic. That error in the timeline was just one of those things that stood out to me.


No problem!  :wink:

Back in the very beginning of the case there was alot of bad information.  This time line someone attempted to put together on July 9th, 2005..that's very early in the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 12:21:24 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
[Why doesn't the NL just dump Aruba as one of their protectorates or whatever they call the Netherlands Antilles?  It seems Aruba is just shaming them and draining money from them.  I doubt if Aruba ever gave them one dime of the profits from tourism. Or perhaps tt's a symbiotic relationship and the NL needs them to tranship their drugs in & out, and launder their dirty money too.

What bothers me the most about Aruba's judicial system is that it is based on the one in the NL's which is also the basis of the world court.  Look at what happened in the Milosevic trial where they dragged their feet so long, the defendent died in prison.  But yet, they are trying to expedite this case for the vd Sloots.


Sunfreak,
The World Court is NOT based on Dutch law at all.  That is merely the location of the physical proceedings of the court the way the United Nations is in our country but we do not control it.

The World Court operates under International Laws and Treaties and those are established as a part of the UN and other international organizations.

.


Your right Anna. I defer to you on this issue.  However I would like to add that I knew the world court law itself was based on International Laws, but I thought the framework of how the Word Court works was based more on the Dutch system than our system.

I'm going to bed.  I'm not making myself clear tonight.  I don't want to confuse the issues or make anyone aggravated with me.

Goodnight everyone.  Pleasant dreams to all except those guilty of crimes against Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 12:22:22 AM
Heh, heh, just caught myself wondering if RWV still existed, too lazy to go check myself.

Anyone remember that there was a 'refugees' site from RWV back in the early days, some lady got on the wrong side of Dan and went and started her own forum. Is that forum still around or did it become part of one of the other sites we discuss?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 23, 2006, 12:23:36 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yellow Ribbon - I doubt that it's accurate at all.  It's a compilation of articles and internet rumors.  I was just trying to find when the rumor of Paulus was started.  I'd love to see who originally posted the rumor as well.


Sorry to pull you off topic. That error in the timeline was just one of those things that stood out to me.


No problem!  :wink:

Back in the very beginning of the case there was alot of bad information.  This time line someone attempted to put together on July 9th, 2005..that's very early in the case.


It's sad how early that seems now. Back then July 9th was about 6 weeks into the case and almost a month after the networks mistakenly announced that Natalee had been found dead. Considering that Beth and her friends had fingered Joran, etc. within hours, 6 weeks seemed like an eternity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 23, 2006, 12:28:11 AM
This reporter on Fox's The Lineup can't pronounce Meridian, MS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 23, 2006, 12:29:37 AM
When July 1st came, it seemed like this case had already dragged on forever. If we had known...

I have saved the 1st page of the 1st thread in this Forum, from June 11th, 2005.  The #3 post on that page, someone said, "It's about time we had answers, this has dragged on too long". Wow. And we are here...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 12:30:15 AM
Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
This reporter on Fox's The Lineup can't pronounce Meridian, MS.


Yeah, but all them FOX gals are real Babes aren't they?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: sb on October 23, 2006, 12:31:43 AM
And with that I think I will bid all you goodnight. Good seeing everyone in here tonight... been a little empty lately.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 23, 2006, 12:33:53 AM
Quote from: "sb"
When July 1st came, it seemed like this case had already dragged on forever. If we had known...

I have saved the 1st page of the 1st thread in this Forum, from June 11th, 2005.  The #3 post on that page, someone said, "It's about time we had answers, this has dragged on too long". Wow. And we are here...


I know that's how I felt on June 11th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Yellow Ribbon on October 23, 2006, 12:36:59 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
This reporter on Fox's The Lineup can't pronounce Meridian, MS.


Yeah, but all them FOX gals are real Babes aren't they?


How many blondes does it take to pronounce Meridian?   How many more does it take to spell Mississippi?  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: the big hammer on October 23, 2006, 12:44:16 AM
PVDS 5:00 pm Airport Pickup on 5/29/05

Are greta interviews available for posting?

Didn't jvds mention this?

/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 12:47:33 AM
Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
This reporter on Fox's The Lineup can't pronounce Meridian, MS.


Yeah, but all them FOX gals are real Babes aren't they?


How many blondes does it take to pronounce Meridian?   How many more does it take to spell Mississippi?  :)


Ah, do old guys like me, 'really' care?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 12:48:06 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
PVDS 5:00 pm Airport Pickup on 5/29/05

Are greta interviews available for posting?

Didn't jvds mention this?

/

Greta interview with Joran is posted at Scrux.  I just read through it and couldn't find any reference to Paulus being in Holland.

Edited to add:  It's posted here as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=56


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 12:51:31 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
[Why doesn't the NL just dump Aruba as one of their protectorates or whatever they call the Netherlands Antilles?  It seems Aruba is just shaming them and draining money from them.  I doubt if Aruba ever gave them one dime of the profits from tourism. Or perhaps tt's a symbiotic relationship and the NL needs them to tranship their drugs in & out, and launder their dirty money too.

What bothers me the most about Aruba's judicial system is that it is based on the one in the NL's which is also the basis of the world court.  Look at what happened in the Milosevic trial where they dragged their feet so long, the defendent died in prison.  But yet, they are trying to expedite this case for the vd Sloots.


Sunfreak,
The World Court is NOT based on Dutch law at all.  That is merely the location of the physical proceedings of the court the way the United Nations is in our country but we do not control it.

The World Court operates under International Laws and Treaties and those are established as a part of the UN and other international organizations.

.


Your right Anna. I defer to you on this issue.  However I would like to add that I knew the world court law itself was based on International Laws, but I thought the framework of how the Word Court works was based more on the Dutch system than our system.

I'm going to bed.  I'm not making myself clear tonight.  I don't want to confuse the issues or make anyone aggravated with me.

Goodnight everyone.  Pleasant dreams to all except those guilty of crimes against Natalee.


Sorry if I misunderstand but there is nothing uniquely Dutch and even the language used by the court would be English and French the languages of Business/Diplomacy instead of Dutch.  It operates fully under United nations protocol which is not much better than Aruban IMO, lol.

But the Dutch are only the Landlords of the building just as we are of the UN building.  And I suppose many Dutch are employed there as support personnel but they have no more say about anything than any other member nation.  It is not a part of their national court system and is totally independent.  While it does seem to drag its feet on everything, this is one we can't blame on the Dutch but rather the UN who basically runs the thing.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 12:57:20 AM
Quote from: "sb"
I KNEW I needed to read PVDS statement. There is a lot of new stuff there.

I find it telling, and almost incontrovertible, that Joran WAS NOT IN SCHOOL ON MONDAY. I don't see how we can get anything else from that statement but that Joran MISSED that day. The headmaster was wrong about days and dates. Simple.

And THAT fact, says a great deal. There was a LOT of time to clean up any number of messes.

I also find the fact that Joran "won" $$$ and had his father deposit it VERY suspicious. 2 words: Money Laundering.

Joran came up with $$$ he couldn't account for, on Sunday night/Monday morning. Who says he won it? Is it a PAYOFF of some kind from someone outside?

Dad gave it "legitimacy" by depositing it himself.

Your thoughts?

It is 300.00 $$$$$$ that he won . ??/
Money laundering ? No one launders these palltry amounts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 12:59:53 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
PVDS 5:00 pm Airport Pickup on 5/29/05

Are greta interviews available for posting?

Didn't jvds mention this?

/

Greta interview with Joran is posted at Scrux.  I just read through it and couldn't find any reference to Paulus being in Holland.

Edited to add:  It's posted here as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=56


Yep, nothing in there about airport pickup, I am mystified.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 01:00:18 AM
They can't just " dump" Aruba.
They have an agreement where Aruba will obtain its full independence from Holland in the future.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: justinsmama on October 23, 2006, 01:04:40 AM
Good night, all. I've stayed up way too late! Pity my clients tomorrow, as I'm an air head on the best of days...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: justinsmama on October 23, 2006, 01:05:07 AM
BTW, isn't Natalee lovely?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 01:06:12 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
PVDS 5:00 pm Airport Pickup on 5/29/05

Are greta interviews available for posting?

Didn't jvds mention this?

/

Greta interview with Joran is posted at Scrux.  I just read through it and couldn't find any reference to Paulus being in Holland.

Edited to add:  It's posted here as well:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=56


Yep, nothing in there about airport pickup, I am mystified.

Maybe it was in one of the Paulus interviews. There was a great discussion about Paulus coming home from NL and the first thing he does is go to a casino with Joran, just b/c it was a " free tournamant " and he wants to check it out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 01:14:38 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
BTW, isn't Natalee lovely?

Yes, she is...

Goodnight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: lexie on October 23, 2006, 01:32:38 AM
Hi, All....
Have not been able to read much the past couple of weeks, and am having a real hard time catching up!  But I am here for Natalee's family, especially since her birthday has come and gone again.  I keep hoping for some good news, and am trying to remain positive.  I know I can count on the Monkeys to keep me posted.

Back to reading and catching up....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 01:33:07 AM
Well, I can't find it.  I'd rather take a beating than go in those RWV archives but I may suit up tomorrow and give it a shot.

But I could swear I recall Joran saying that to Greta about meeting his father at the airport.  Did she interview Joran at other times?  My eyes are crossing for tonight.  And it is cold here with first expected freeze tomorrow night.   :shock:

Goodnight all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 01:35:14 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Well, I can't find it.  I'd rather take a beating than go in those RWV archives but I may suit up tomorrow and give it a shot.

But I could swear I recall Joran saying that to Greta about meeting his father at the airport.  Did she interview Joran at other times?  My eyes are crossing for tonight.  And it is cold here with first expected freeze tomorrow night.   :shock:

Goodnight all.


Nope, Greta only did one interview, right after the rush deal on the NY interview, was that the cuomo interview?

Think we all saw a couple more interviews but don't remember them all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 01:36:35 AM
Almost wish we could do a google search on 'JVDS picks up dad' or 'Paulus arrives home from Holland'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 01:47:50 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Almost wish we could do a google search on 'JVDS picks up dad' or 'Paulus arrives home from Holland'.

Already tried that  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 01:50:01 AM
Quote from: "lexie"
Hi, All....
Have not been able to read much the past couple of weeks, and am having a real hard time catching up!  But I am here for Natalee's family, especially since her birthday has come and gone again.  I keep hoping for some good news, and am trying to remain positive.  I know I can count on the Monkeys to keep me posted.

Back to reading and catching up....

Hi Lexie - nothing really new to report really.  A new statement and Beth was on Hour with Power.  You can catch up by ready the front page of SM.  Would be faster than trying to read all the way through the thread.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: lexie on October 23, 2006, 02:16:23 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "lexie"
Hi, All....
Have not been able to read much the past couple of weeks, and am having a real hard time catching up!  But I am here for Natalee's family, especially since her birthday has come and gone again.  I keep hoping for some good news, and am trying to remain positive.  I know I can count on the Monkeys to keep me posted.

Back to reading and catching up....

Hi Lexie - nothing really new to report really.  A new statement and Beth was on Hour with Power.  You can catch up by ready the front page of SM.  Would be faster than trying to read all the way through the thread.


Have finally caught up...and what a GREAT interview.  I remember VERY early in the case, a poster on RWV talking about her feeling that Natalee was involved in a great battle between good and evil.  After hearing that interview, maybe she was not too far off.  One thing that is very apparent when you look at Beth Twitty is the light in her eyes.  The Bible talks about the early followers of Christ "having his face in their countenance."  Maybe that is what we are seeing in Beth.  After all these months of disappointments and frustration, it would be nice to see Beth and Dave finally get some answers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: lexie on October 23, 2006, 02:21:53 AM
Have been doing a lot of volunteer work at g'son's school.  Last week we had a scare... two schools  (grades K-4) went into lockdown because there was a person threatenting suicide within blocks of the two schools.  She had a gun, and was driving in the area between the two.  Police finally followed her home and took her in for help... Was scary for all the adults (and the parents who had heard rumors) but the kids were never in any real danger.  I did learn a lot about the schools' emergency plans.  

Got to get some sleep, its after 1 a.m. here.  

Thanks, Klaas, for keeping me posted.  I will try not to get so far behind on reading from now on.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: blah on October 23, 2006, 07:11:31 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.

Paulus would trust Jan Van der Straaten.  Now how do we know evidence was buried?  He could have given it to someone to hold that we would never think of.


I don't think Paulus would trust personal items with anyone else.  And, remember, he worked in the garden on Tuesday.  Very odd.


So the Beth and gang show up late Monday night and they have the confrontation at Sloot residence.  So at this time there is no doubt that Paulus knows his son was last seen with Natalee.  By Tuesday - pretty much whole island knows that Natalee was missing and i'm sure pretty much everyone knew Joran was last to see her.

And Paulus figures this would be a good time to get a little gardening done?  Pretty strange for sure.

I also agree with the person who said it doesnt appear to be a very well kept yard/garden from all of the picture we have seen.


Title: Good Morning all
Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 07:33:36 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: jmho
Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 07:42:51 AM
I took me hours to catch on the conversation!  I have to agree with Tylergal and Anna on many points.  I think Paul realized he was a failure in a country of inferior people.  He was seething inside.  He was a middle-aged, unhappily married man who looked with envy at his son Joran and allowed him to have a bachelor apt to watch the parade of oung "chicas" come and go.  He watched porn, drank and lived a life of quiet desperation.  Anita went  ( or was sent ) away for a week and Paul had one week-end to go wild.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 08:00:34 AM
Alana Jordan/Ed Kissel Interview on Bill O'Reilly:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159764,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Shizaru on October 23, 2006, 08:24:52 AM
I have made some edits and additions to the Croes/Joran conversation portion of the TL, which I've posted below.  A few interesting things I noticed:

Paulus contrdicts Croes about whether Joran told Natalee he was the girl whose money he won back

Paulus contrdicts Croes about what sort of sexual activity Joran initially described with Natalee

Paulus corroborates Croes' claim to Greta that Joran told him he danced with Natalee. That now makes 4 people (Satish, Kissel, Croes, and Paulus) who say they either saw Joran dancing with Natalee or heard Joran say he danced with her, altho Joran now claims he refused to dance with her


Quote

C. Croes is the first person to question Joran, and Joran tells Croes his entire initial story, from his first meeting with Natalee to HI dropoff (P 6/23)

Joran claims to Croes that Natalee was the girl whose money he helped win back at the casino, and that she called him her "lucky charm" (OTR 5/30/05).

Paulus hears Joran tell Croes that he had helped a girl win back money at the casino. A few days later Joran when Joran sees a picture of Natalee and her friends in one of the US newspapers, he says the girl whose money he helped win back is the one on the extreme right in the picture, not Natalee (P 6/23)

Joran tells Croes that at CnCs, Natalee came on to him, and was dancing provacatively, "like a slut" (Vanity Fair, OTR 5/30/05)

Joran tells Croes that he danced with Natalee (OTR 6/30/05)

Paulus hears Joran tell Croes that he danced with Natalee (P 6/23)

Joran tells Croes that Natalee may have been doing drugs. When Croes repeats this in an interview, he says Joran told him Natalee had been "doing drugs and possibly drinking too", but presumably Croes meant to say it the other way around (OTR 6/30/05)

Joran tells Croes that Natalee was "crazy" (Vanity Fair)

When Joran tells Croes that Natalee told him her mother was Hitler's sister, he also says she told him she wanted to go to Austria (P 6/23)

Joran tells Croes that Natalee performed oral sex on him in the car, and that she told him she was a virgin (Vanity Fair).

Joran addresses the Americans and asks if Natalee's parents are present. Jug says he is Natalee's stepfather. Joran asks Jug to step away for a moment and then tells the others that he and Natalee had been kissing in the back seat and he had fingered her (P 6/23)

Joren tells Croes that at the lighthouse Deepak became concerned that Natalee would "make a mess" in the car, presumably by vomiting (Vanity Fair)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: blah on October 23, 2006, 09:06:39 AM
From, the Natalee Timeline website:

Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT’s plane lands in ARUBA after a layover in Curacao after he was, supposedly, on a HOLLAND trip. Here is the published schedule for Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT’s flight:

Depart:............. 12:40 pm Amsterdam, Holland
Arrive:.............. 10:40 pm
Carrier/Flight:.... KLM flight # 0785 / 9H 2964
Equip:............... 747/AT4
Freq:................. Sunday
Stop/Connect:.... A57/Curacao 4:20 PM
Trip Time:......... 16:00 hours

Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT’s “judge-in-training” had already been revoked, and he was so notified a week or so before NATALEE disappeared

Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT was never a full judge.

Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT failed his first judgeship exam, and was notified of his failure by DUTCH judicial authorities, and possible island expulsion in the future

(His wife, apparently, either still thinks he is a judge-in-training because Current Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT never told her he was fired--and therefore Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT had also been lying to his wife--

Or,

She is also deliberately lying, and just wants everyone to think he still is a judge--because in almost every one of her post-May 30, 2005 interviews, she refers to him as a “judge” As late as at least June 29, 2005 Current Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT was also constantly referring to himself as a “judge“)

????Did Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT pick up Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT at the ARUBA airport sometime after the 4:40 PM scheduled arrival time????

????If Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT pick up Current Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT, did the two of them go directly to the “Excelsior Casino” since Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT later claimed he saw some Mountain Brook high school graduates drinking in the “Excelsior Casino”????

????Since Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT claimed he knew the classmates he saw in the “Excelsior Casino” at 5:00 PM were from “Mountain Brook high school,” when, precisely, was the first time BEFORE 4:40 PM that Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT met/interacted with the classmates and lied to them that he was a foreign exchange student and tourist on vacation who was also staying at the “Holiday Inn”????

 

__:__ PM (?) = Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT plane taxi‘s from the airport landing strip to its airport terminal gate, then parks.

 

__:__ PM (?) = Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT exits his plane.

 

__:__ PM (?) = If Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT had non-carry-on baggage he goes to the baggage area and retrieves his baggage.

 

__:__ PM (?) = Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT leaves the airport terminal and walks outside the airport terminal to either be met by Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT, or a friend, or, hail a taxi.

 

__:__ PM (?) = Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT is met by Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT or a friend at the airport, or, Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT takes a taxi to the “Excelsior” casino, or Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT takes a taxi to his home.

 

__:__ PM (?) = Former Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT and Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT each make their way via a vehicle to the “Excelsior“ casino, either together, or separately, and arrive there.

 

4:00 PM = Prime Suspect JORAN VAN DER SLOOT (age 17) enters the “Excelsior” casino with or separately from Current Suspect PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT. They enter a “Texas Hold’em” poker tournament. NATALEE’s step-cousin, THOMAS TWITTY, enters the same tournament and plays at the same table as the Suspects SLOOT’s

4:30 PM = On 6-20 ANDRE MONTIVAL AOKI DOS SANTOS (a.k.a. “Dre”) stated to the ARUBAN Police:

<QUOTE>

On your question if I on Sunday, May 29 2005, met Joran, Deepak and Satish, I answer you the following:

On Sunday, May 29, 2005, around 16:30, I met Joran in the Excelsior casino of the Holiday Inn hotel. The moment I met Joran I was in the company of my father called "Montival SANTOS". Joran was in the company of father named “Paul” that is when my father and I met them in the “Excelsior Casino”. On that day we played in a "Texas Hold'm poker Tournament". Joran was first to be eliminated from the tournament. I no longer remember at what time Joran lost. I saw that Joran then played "black-Jack" and I continued play poker. After I was eliminated from the poker game I went over to Joran who was still sitting at the black-jack table. I no longer remember what time I left the poker table. When I stood beside Joran, I saw that there was a group of American students who were on holiday in Aruba talking. I saw that Joran helped one of the girls play black-jack. Joran told me that he was busy helping the girl with black-jack because according to Joran she had lost much money. After Joran helped the girl, Joran and I walked around in the Excelsior casino. I saw the group girls who were playing black-Jack with Joran walk by and I heard the girls say he should go to Carlos & Charlies later in the evening hours because they would like to meet him there. Joran answered for them not to worry, he would go. On Sunday, May 29, 2005 in the evening hours, after the Texas Hold'm poker Tournament at the Excelsior casino I ran into “Elvis KELLY ", and his wife "Gladys” and we all got into my fathers pick up and drove away. My father acted as a driver for our two passengers in his green pick-up of the make Ford Ranger, license plate number "A-23793". We drove first to Wendy's Palm Beach to buy food and after we had eaten, my father dropped off Elvis and Gladys at their home. Elvis and Gladys live in the hamlet Noord. I don’t know their address but I can designate to you their house. After we dropped Elvis and wife at their home my father and I went home. I no longer remember what time we got home. I studied first and afterwards slept because I had a "physics" examination to take on Monday, May 30, 2005, from 07.30 till 10.00. I do recall that Joran asked me if I wanted to accompany him to Carlos & Charlies but I answered him that I could not go because I had an examination the next day.


<END QUOTE>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 09:33:48 AM
Looks like there is a "war" between Holland and Aruba concerning the financial mess Aruba is in with mounting debts, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 09:34:11 AM
See that focus was still on when we heard Joran picked up his father at the airport on 5/29/05:  I could also swear I recall Anita  on TV, perhaps from Holland or immediately upon her return saying 'we were at a family function in Holland'...can't find it though.  Found this interview, however:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160471,00.html

Partial quote:

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men — one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 09:44:37 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Looks like there is a "war" between Holland and Aruba concerning the financial mess Aruba is in with mounting debts, etc.




geeeeesh

thats a shame  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 09:44:46 AM
Blah,
Thanks for bringing that over and posting.  So much detail!  I only wish he had given a source for that and am sure he does, too, now.  Was this just another "decoy" thrown at us?  Hard to believe with all that detail and yet now it appears Paulus was home all along???

I don't get it.  Why were we told this in the first place?  What purpose did it serve?  Maybe prevent anyone from looking at Paulus activities all week?  Had he in fact been lurking around the HI pretending to be a tourist just like his son?

Did we just wrongly assume he was along because Anita said "WE" were attending a family function in the NL?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 09:51:31 AM
ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: A hundred percent no. No. He is, like, Mom, I would not smoke or I would not use drugs because I am a sporter. I want to make something out of my future. If there would have been anything of that, I would have noticed. I'm a teacher. I work with kids between 12 and 18 years, the last 25 years. So you're used to so many things, problems that appear with your students. You're so alert. And I think you're even more alert with your own children.

geeeesh anita, did you notice anything about the incessant TELLING of LIES, stealing, drinking by the barrel, sneaking out at night, killing dogs

huh ??

did ya ??

huh ???

how about that, any of that catch your EYE ??


what a load of BS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:18:35 AM
Yep, Anita is alert all right.... :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:26:00 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Yep, Anita is alert all right.... :twisted:


yep, anita is on the ball

"anita" = "i need a"


 pair of glasses

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 10:27:44 AM
Quote from: "robots"
ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: A hundred percent no. No. He is, like, Mom, I would not smoke or I would not use drugs because I am a sporter. I want to make something out of my future. If there would have been anything of that, I would have noticed. I'm a teacher. I work with kids between 12 and 18 years, the last 25 years. So you're used to so many things, problems that appear with your students. You're so alert. And I think you're even more alert with your own children.

geeeesh anita, did you notice anything about the incessant TELLING of LIES, stealing, drinking by the barrel, sneaking out at night, killing dogs

huh ??

did ya ??

huh ???

how about that, any of that catch your EYE ??


what a load of BS  8)




all of it..yes w/ a straight face too..just like she taught joran


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:30:21 AM
Hey FOM...I was thinking about you the other day... how are you??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:31:46 AM
i think anita should give up teaching


if she ddint see issues with her own son.....ummmmm...errrrrrrrr..

ahhhhhhhh...maybe she should get a new career


i can see her in the bra modeling business

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


OMG..im busting over here :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 10:34:34 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey FOM...I was thinking about you the other day... how are you??



SWEETIE!!!!!!

i was in a breakfast place the other day...thinking of you..and changing seats w/ my mom...LOLOLOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:35:32 AM
Robots...

LMAO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 10:36:05 AM
Quote from: "robots"
i think anita should give up teaching


if she ddint see issues with her own son.....ummmmm...errrrrrrrr..

ahhhhhhhh...maybe she should get a new career


i can see her in the bra modeling business

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


OMG..im busting over here :twisted:
[/color]



I"M GONNA LOSE MY COOKIES ON THAT THOUGHT! :shock:  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:36:06 AM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey FOM...I was thinking about you the other day... how are you??



SWEETIE!!!!!!

i was in a breakfast place the other day...thinking of you..and changing seats w/ my mom...LOLOLOL



You didn't give her a happy meal did you??? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:37:11 AM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "robots"
i think anita should give up teaching


if she ddint see issues with her own son.....ummmmm...errrrrrrrr..

ahhhhhhhh...maybe she should get a new career


i can see her in the bra modeling business

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


OMG..im busting over here :twisted:
[/color]



I"M GONNA LOSE MY COOKIES ON THAT THOUGHT! :shock:  :?



 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:37:39 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Robots...

LMAO




 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 10:40:03 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey FOM...I was thinking about you the other day... how are you??



SWEETIE!!!!!!

i was in a breakfast place the other day...thinking of you..and changing seats w/ my mom...LOLOLOL



You didn't give her a happy meal did you??? :shock:


no...lol...still did tellthe tale over breakfast.....she was like "WTF???"|
and she was glad i was only out sum shampoo and wine

and that it did not go any further u know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:42:46 AM
It is so true FOM... so true... somethings are better left at McDonalds...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 10:44:13 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
See that focus was still on when we heard Joran picked up his father at the airport on 5/29/05:  I could also swear I recall Anita  on TV, perhaps from Holland or immediately upon her return saying 'we were at a family function in Holland'...can't find it though.  Found this interview, however:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160471,00.html

Partial quote:

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...

Satish Kalpoe was probably only a few months older than Joran.  Notice how Anita points out that her young sporter is a Kid and Satish is a man.  Joran was about two months shy of his 18th Birthday already drinking, gambling, drugging and smoking like a man.  What is the difference between Satish and Joran?  To me there is no difference they were both in high school and already criminals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 10:44:37 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
It is so true FOM... so true... somethings are better left at McDonalds...


yes

on ignore u know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 10:46:31 AM
Quote from: "robots"
i think anita should give up teaching


if she ddint see issues with her own son.....ummmmm...errrrrrrrr..

ahhhhhhhh...maybe she should get a new career


i can see her in the bra modeling business

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


OMG..im busting over here :twisted:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 10:51:07 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
See that focus was still on when we heard Joran picked up his father at the airport on 5/29/05:  I could also swear I recall Anita  on TV, perhaps from Holland or immediately upon her return saying 'we were at a family function in Holland'...can't find it though.  Found this interview, however:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160471,00.html

Partial quote:

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...

Satish Kalpoe was probably only a few months older than Joran.  Notice how Anita points out that her young sporter is a Kid and Satish is a man.  Joran was about two months shy of his 18th Birthday already drinking, gambling, drugging and smoking like a man.  What is the difference between Satish and Joran?  To me there is no difference they were both in high school and already criminals.


Yes, I saw that, but only highlighted the part about her getting back.....I believe they admitted that Joran was friends with both Kalpoes, and in doing so, admitted they let their 'kid' run about town with 'men', so that little detail doesn't mean that much, imo.  Notice how she went from one kid, two men to 'boys' in the next sentence...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:53:53 AM
Well I think she uses the term boy or "delicious sporter" to show her child is just that a child...

notice one stinky island refers to Natalee consistently as a young woman....

so a woman and children.....

semantics... and they suck!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 10:54:55 AM
My question is why did Paulus make a trip to the bank twice that day.  Did he go in the morning to give orders on what should be done to his account and then go at the end of the day to make sure everything was OK and they did what he told them to do.

Or was a large amount of money that he either withdrew from his account or he made a deposit for a payment to him for something.

Did he want a large amount of cash to pay off someone and he said to the bank have it ready I will pick it up later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 10:58:03 AM
NEW ARUBA TOURISM AD


WELCOME TO ARUBA
BEND OVER
KY COMPLIMENTS OF THE ALE
JUDICIAL SYSTEM
AND TOURISM ADVOCATES


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 11:01:35 AM
FROM PAULUS 6/23/05 STATEMENT:

There were long cues at the bank so I left without having made any transaction and went back to work. I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

Notice how Paulus specifically mentions which bank he went to.  When I go to the bank and I usually tell someone I just say I have to stop at the bank.  Paulus makes it a point to specifically mention which bank.

I bet this isn't even the bank Paulus went to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on October 23, 2006, 11:07:59 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Well I think she uses the term boy or "delicious sporter" to show her child is just that a child...

notice one stinky island refers to Natalee consistently as a young woman....

so a woman and children.....

semantics... and they suck!!



then throw in a little papiamento just to confuse it a bit more u know?

see u monkeys later


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 11:09:26 AM
BBL...Keep the faith Monkeys...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 11:22:44 AM
Quote from: "San"
FROM PAULUS 6/23/05 STATEMENT:

There were long cues at the bank so I left without having made any transaction and went back to work. I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

Notice how Paulus specifically mentions which bank he went to.  When I go to the bank and I usually tell someone I just say I have to stop at the bank.  Paulus makes it a point to specifically mention which bank.

I bet this isn't even the bank Paulus went to.


Next statement also seems contradictory:

To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.
[/b]

Paulus is stating he deposited $ Joran 'said' he won on 5/29/05, which was approx. 500 Aruban guilders....then he says Joran gave him 100 guilders...which is it 500 or 100?  

He can't remember if it was the only stop, but he mentions talking to Ruth Dijkhoff, which he had no problem remembering, and it's another detail like mentioning what bank that just doesn't fit the question...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 11:28:13 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
FROM PAULUS 6/23/05 STATEMENT:

There were long cues at the bank so I left without having made any transaction and went back to work. I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

Notice how Paulus specifically mentions which bank he went to.  When I go to the bank and I usually tell someone I just say I have to stop at the bank.  Paulus makes it a point to specifically mention which bank.

I bet this isn't even the bank Paulus went to.


Next statement also seems contradictory:

To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.
[/b]

Paulus is stating he deposited $ Joran 'said' he won on 5/29/05, which was approx. 500 Aruban guilders....then he says Joran gave him 100 guilders...which is it 500 or 100?  

He can't remember if it was the only stop, but he mentions talking to Ruth Dijkhoff, which he had no problem remembering, and it's another detail like mentioning what bank that just doesn't fit the question...

Exactly.  It's like he is writing the script as he goes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:31:25 AM
Quote from: "robots"
ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: A hundred percent no. No. He is, like, Mom, I would not smoke or I would not use drugs because I am a sporter. I want to make something out of my future. If there would have been anything of that, I would have noticed. I'm a teacher. I work with kids between 12 and 18 years, the last 25 years. So you're used to so many things, problems that appear with your students. You're so alert. And I think you're even more alert with your own children.

geeeesh anita, did you notice anything about the incessant TELLING of LIES, stealing, drinking by the barrel, sneaking out at night, killing dogs

huh ??

did ya ??

huh ???

how about that, any of that catch your EYE ??


what a load of BS  8)



Not sure if it is this interview or another one but at some point Greta asked Anita if Joran ever does drugs, drinks. . . . and this was Anita's reply.  It specifically included DRINKING and Anita denied that her Delicious Sporter who gives her THICK KISSES does either.

I have gone back and checked this a dozen times to be sure the question included DRINKING because I could not believe even Anita the Bra would lie so brazenly.

She did.

 :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:33:23 AM
Hi, FOM,

This is for you!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th650.gif)

LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:36:28 AM
Another trick Greta used was the two part interveiw.  She would air it in two parts and now sometimes only one part is available in the transcripts.

If these were not taken from originals, I could swear she had Dan Rhieled the Sporter interview cause so many of us thought that was where Joran said he picked Paulus up at the airport.

We all got that idea somewhere, so let's just keep an eye out for it and hope we eventually get ot the bottom of that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:43:21 AM
I tend to think the first trip to the bank included running Sporter by the school or picking him up from there because he was still drunk and babbling about Natalee hitting her head.

You are both right, Paulus sure can't add!  He makes no mention of where the rest of the money came from and ALE conveniently never asks any kind of follow up especially from Paulus who was the boss of them to a certain degree through his pal Rudy Croes.

Why would over a dozen adults have taken off in search of one kid?  We don't do it that way around here even if it is something as simple as hand me the remote control to the TV.  If any steps are taken, they are taken by the underling and that would be the kid.  And it was a school night and Joran should have been in bed anyway and yet they all leave in search of him.  What did he and Deepak put in the car while Paulus had the Alabama Delegation away from the house?  Is that why they were leaning on the car, to protect the contents in the event any of them got the idea to search?

Why did they not call Satish to participate in the conversation as well?  After all, he was along, right?  Why did the cops not go retrieve him as well?

I guess the answer to all that would be Paulus wouldn't let us as KJ is so fond of saying.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Red on October 23, 2006, 11:54:58 AM
Front Page post:

All is not Well in Paradise, Now Aruba upset with The Netherlands: “The relationship between the Netherlands and Aruba is currently so bad …”

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/10/23/all-is-not-well-in-paradise-now-aruba-upset-with-the-netherlands-the-relationship-between-the-netherlands-and-aruba-is-currently-so-bad/


But according to Oduber, Aruba has lost confidence in the Netherlands, now that this country has made the island’s financial loans conditional.  It is so, that Aruba can no longer take out loans just like that.

So then it should come as no surprise to Prime Minister Nelson Oduber or any other Aruban officials why the United States tourism community has lost confidence in Aruba. Turn about is fair play Mr. Oduber.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on October 23, 2006, 11:57:30 AM
It is blatantly obvious that Paulus' has selective memory. This is a very long statement and he in most parts claims " I cannot remember exactly ...It is possible but I cannot remember, I cannot remember but I think... I at least cannot
remember,  I cannot exactly remember ... I
cannot exactly remember anymore. (LMAO) His own words....THEN when he starts in re: Natalee's part of the interview, he seems to ramble on like he remembers everything.....every detail. This is very telling'...and in my opinion suggests malice. How on earth can anyone read this and not see malice, in some form>??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 11:59:07 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Another trick Greta used was the two part interveiw.  She would air it in two parts and now sometimes only one part is available in the transcripts.
If these were not taken from originals, I could swear she had Dan Rhieled the Sporter interview cause so many of us thought that was where Joran said he picked Paulus up at the airport.

We all got that idea somewhere, so let's just keep an eye out for it and hope we eventually get ot the bottom of that one.


Good point, Anna, because last night I could only find one and believe it was part 2.  Will have to keep looking.

Also, it's exasperating to read the statements and see what is recalled and what is not.  Could be deemed as selective memory....but, I believe Joran made some comment about his father's memory or ability to stick to details....do you remember something like that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 12:02:02 PM
ANITA the bra  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 12:02:39 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Anna"
Another trick Greta used was the two part interveiw.  She would air it in two parts and now sometimes only one part is available in the transcripts.
If these were not taken from originals, I could swear she had Dan Rhieled the Sporter interview cause so many of us thought that was where Joran said he picked Paulus up at the airport.

We all got that idea somewhere, so let's just keep an eye out for it and hope we eventually get ot the bottom of that one.


Good point, Anna, because last night I could only find one and believe it was part 2.  Will have to keep looking.

Also, it's exasperating to read the statements and see what is recalled and what is not.  Could be deemed as selective memory....but, I believe Joran made some comment about his father's memory or ability to stick to details....do you remember something like that?



joran did say that, you are correct


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: the big hammer on October 23, 2006, 12:02:50 PM
Florins VS Guilders VS Dollars


PVDS Statement:  "...At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately 500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he had taken over my place in the tournament..."

Dutch Currency = Guilder.  Subsumed as part of transfer to Euro based system.  Last avail exchange rate I can find is 1 Guilder = 0.57 US Dollars.

Aruban Local Currency = Florin (AWG).  Sometimes called a "guilder".  Current exchange rate is 1 Florin = 0.57 US Dollars.

Almost exactly the same "value" here.  500 "guilder" deposit is approximately $285 in US equivalent currency.

Now where does this money come from, per pvds?  He says that jvds gave him 500 guilders, joran's "winnings" from poker.  AND, that joran also gave Paulus 100 guilders because of the claimed seat switch at tournament.

1.  So, did pvds deposit this money into joran's account at bank?  Or his own, Or the family account?

2.  Based on 500 guilder deposit, less the 100 guilder already given to pvds by joran, do we assume therefore that poker winning totalled 400 guilders or approx $228?

3.  How do you think the casinos pay out winnings?  In hard currency, or local currency?  I would guess the hotel has a foreign exchange window, yes?

4.  Why drive to Noord (from his office, I suppose in Orangstead) to make a measly deposit like this?

5.  While we have never confirmed any WITHDRAWALS 5/29 - 5/30, here we have two attempts at DEPOSITS, and for a relatively small amount of money (hell, the sneakers jvds wears cost $100).  

I have never heard any commentary on WHAT KIND of currency Natalee was carrying when she went to C&C's on 5/29, and have always guessed and have heard others speculate that she likely had about $50 - $75 US dollars on her person.

So, if you're Paulus, what do you do with a dead girl's money?


Do you take her cash, go to a store, transfer the US currency into local coin, grab a bunch of guilders, put it all together, and make a deposit at the family bank?  Or do you burn it?  Or do you flush it down the toilet?  Well, I think you do what you are comfortable doing, and in Paulus' case, that's moving money around.

Long ago I indicated that the $100 (or possibly $50) Natalee was given by Beth prior to trip was likely traceable because she gave Natalee bank issued wrapped money (single US dollars for tips) that were NEW.  And new bills are issued in serial format.

I think Paulus is washing Natalee's money here, and that's WHY he HAD TO GET TO THE BANK on Monday May 30.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 12:03:16 PM
Aruba is no longer called ARUBA

simply refer to it as TOILET  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 12:08:18 PM
Amanda PORTOCARRERO (maid) 7/28/2005 Statement:

    born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

    - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

    - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them. [/list]

    MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF (MAID) 08/11/05 Statement:

      I have worked ( 8 ) years at family Van Der Sloot. I work as from Monday up to and including Friday for them. I do not work on Saturday and Sunday at family Van Der Sloot. I work daily four (4) hours at family Van Der Sloot. With family VDS, I mean the parents of the detained man "Joran Van Der Sloot". (meaning the suspect "Joran Van Der Sloot"; observation JACOBS).

      On your question if I can tell you specifically when I worked from Monday up to and including Friday at the family Van Der Sloot, I answer the following:
       
      I work on Monday from
    08.00 till 12.00.
    I work on Tuesday from 13.30 till 17.30.
    I work on Wednesday from 13.30 till 17.30.
    I work on Thursday from 13.30 till 15.30
    and I work on Friday from 13.30 till 17.30 at family Van Der Sloot
    As you can see I work daily four (4) hours at family Van Der Sloot with exception of Thursday because then I work only two (2) hours. [/list]

    This maids hours are different only on that Monday Morning.  Joran and Paulus were home.  Was she helping them clean the mess that Joran made.  Was there a different maid there helping?  I think this mail is one fat liar just like her employer.

    I think that Amanda PORTOCARRERO is the missing maid.  They are trying to say she is the woman who heard another maid say she saw sand under Joran's clothes.  This is the actual missing maid.  JMO.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Nut44x4 on October 23, 2006, 12:19:28 PM
    Oh......I also wanted to mention that as I surfed channels on TV over the weekend, that court TV and the Oxygen channel were promoting Aruba as a vacation destination. If this has been discussed here and I missed it.....sorry...I have to mention it. They are promoting Aruba.com in the commercials, big time. Makes me sick.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: nonesuche on October 23, 2006, 12:30:08 PM
    Hi All-

    As for Anita just think back to the video of her heading to LaGuardia to protect the sporter post him being served by Bo Dietl, that raging mad momma scene proved to me that she was never a victim nor a martyr in this - she would go for the jugular of anyone who dared to touch her delicious boy. Do any of you ever wonder what indiscretions she may have held over Paulus' head to ensure he did break all the rules to protect delicious son? I have....she also is quite the elitist. Her posted profile at the International School was very telling also, few teachers would have the nerve to state they want to be a "spiritual leader" with no credentials as she did. They may be more esoteric and new age, but that's still a fair amount of ego display on her part.

    As for oxygen and CTV running ads, I write my emails of protest consistently with no responses back, but I also SMILE to think of the cost of that TV air time to Aruba and the ATA. It ain't cheap and so I hope it's hurting their pocketbooks !

    O/T I found this and wanted to post it for Terry........sort of looks like him to me  :lol:

    (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/skydive.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 12:37:28 PM
    I was reading over old transcripts of Greta's interview with Joran and I came across this:

      This is something that shouldn’t be done through the media this is something that you know I have always said and
    I’ve said it to ABC too but they never put it in their piece that if Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway said Joran I want to come to Holland to talk to you I mean I would invite them into my house and answer any questions they would have I mean I would understand if they were mad at me I could understand if they hate me, they despise me I understanding that all.[/list]

    Liar.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 12:51:44 PM
    Just stopping by for a quickie post...(don't get any ideas Carnut).  

    Bondia is the person that hammered home the idea that PVDS was gone the week before to Curacao.  I remember the conversation I had with her about it, although I think it was on PM's at the time.  So maybe in real life there is a transcript of Julia making the statement.  I also remember Marrianne Croes on television speaking of his being on Curacao. Or wait, was it Tito?  We need our archives.  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 01:02:18 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Aruba is no longer called ARUBA

    simply refer to it as TOILET  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :twisted:  :twisted:


    I had to change back to my original avatar for you!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 01:05:17 PM
    Quote from: "AZLady"
    Quote from: "Florida"
    (Tues-) Paulus:

    I cannot remember what I did when I got home. I think that Joran
    went to bed and that I worked a little in the garden  
    and then started preparing dinner. I informed Anita about what
    had taken place. That night I went to bed early.


    You know, Paulus does not strike me as a gardener.  From the photos I've seen, the yard is overrun with weeds and the plants are not in good shape.  Paulus working in the garden is an odd enough visual picture as to make one go "hmmm...."

    I wonder what he was burying in the flowers.


    It reminds me of the movie Rear Window ( with James Stewart & Grace Kelly ) where the man who murdered his wife in the apartment across the way, buried her body in the garden....under the shrubs.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 01:09:07 PM
    Quote from: "AZLady"
    If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.


    Absolutely..and Paulus doesn't strike me as having a green thumb or a garden...and from what we've been able to see of the Sloot Compound, where on earth is a garden ??? It looks like it's pretty arid and dusty.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 01:19:32 PM
    Quote from: "Ono"
    Quote from: "AZLady"
    If Paulus and Joran had DNA and blood on their clothing or shoes from Sunday/Monday's rape and murder, perhaps he felt it was safe to bury them in the garden.  He certainly knew that no one could legally enter his yard unless he allowed them to do so.  No problem.  I've long contended that criminals hide the most incriminating evidence in a place they feel is private and protected.  Remember, when you were a kid, you hid the contraband under your socks and underwear?  The most private place.  Paulus would not trust anyone else to dispose of the most personal evidence, and he would place it in a place he could protect--his own back yard.


    Absolutely..and Paulus doesn't strike me as having a green thumb or a garden...and from what we've been able to see of the Sloot Compound, where on earth is a garden ??? It looks like it's pretty arid and dusty.

    Paulus does have a habit of hiding in the bushes.  He was hiding when Beth and Greta arrived at his home.  He wasn't gardening he was keeping an eye out and hiding in those same bushes to see if anyone came looking for Joran that day.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 01:25:37 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Aruba is no longer called ARUBA

    simply refer to it as TOILET  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :twisted:  :twisted:


    I had to change back to my original avatar for you!




     :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 01:25:57 PM
    Lalas,
    I think you may be right about Bon Dia saying Paulus was in the NL until Sunday.  She is for sure the source of the Sporter riding the bus and aceing his exam on Monday.  That last whopper is why Jug was upset with her when she was charging Beth after being on TV telling that whopper and Jug stopped her.  She had just been on TV lying about Joran doing that when the shoving incident allegedly took place.

    But I still seem to remember Joran saying it as well.  Maybe it is all running together in my mind after all this time.

    BTW, did we ever find out what JORAN.ANGRY! is so .ANGRY! about and is his MySpace still closed?  Anyone know?

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 01:28:49 PM
    Paul's description of his banking activities are deceptively ambiguous; did he deposit 100 guilders into his own bank account or 400 guilders into Joran's account or both?   First of all, did Joran actually win 500 guilders?
    Secondly; why did a employed man leave his workplace to make a paltry bank deposit on a Monday morning?  If memory serves me - wasn't that the Monday after a long weekend in Aruba?  It seems to me that Rita Dirkjoff and the other cleaning woman were working at the VDS house that day and needed to be paid in cash, so it was more likely that Paul was withdrawing money.  Where I come from, a maid is a full time employee who caters to the lady of the house and is the equivalent of a butler who caters to the gentleman.  Neither a maid or a butler would do any kind of heavy cleaning or laundry.  It sounds a little pompous to refer to a cleaning lady as a maid but it fits with the VDS mindset of embellishing every thing related to themselves.
    Paul has proven to be a liar but it is a good, well thought out lie that he was in the vicinity of his home in Noord, on that Monday morning, trying to make a bank transaction but could not, at the very same time his son Joran was absent from school and the Kalpoe brothers were available for ... whatever.   No paper trail to verify this, of course.   No asking Ruth Dirkjoff, who I assume works at the bank, if she could help out an important " judge" who had no time to wait for the riffraff to finish their business.
    In another one of his statements, Paul said that he was at work all day and didn't think he went home for lunch, but now the story has changed.
    Whatever was happening that morning that kept Joran from school and Paul from work centred around Montanja 19 and most likely Joran's apt.    
    The truth is coming out  and it sounds as if Shango and Simian knew what they were talking about.
    P.S.  In the PVDS statement - the part about Charles Croes looking into Joran's eyes and knowing ...(then the next page is missing)  I take that to mean a bad thing.  I doubt CC thought Joran was innocent .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 01:51:20 PM
    Quote from: "Leslie"
    Paul's description of his banking activities are deceptively ambiguous; did he deposit 100 guilders into his own bank account or 400 guilders into Joran's account or both?   First of all, did Joran actually win 500 guilders?
    Secondly; why did a employed man leave his workplace to make a paltry bank deposit on a Monday morning?  If memory serves me - wasn't that the Monday after a long weekend in Aruba?  It seems to me that Rita Dirkjoff and the other cleaning woman were working at the VDS house that day and needed to be paid in cash, so it was more likely that Paul was withdrawing money.  Where I come from, a maid is a full time employee who caters to the lady of the house and is the equivalent of a butler who caters to the gentleman.  Neither a maid or a butler would do any kind of heavy cleaning or laundry.  It sounds a little pompous to refer to a cleaning lady as a maid but it fits with the VDS mindset of embellishing every thing related to themselves.
    Paul has proven to be a liar but it is a good, well thought out lie that he was in the vicinity of his home in Noord, on that Monday morning, trying to make a bank transaction but could not, at the very same time his son Joran was absent from school and the Kalpoe brothers were available for ... whatever.   No paper trail to verify this, of course.   No asking Ruth Dirkjoff, who I assume works at the bank, if she could help out an important " judge" who had no time to wait for the riffraff to finish their business.
    In another one of his statements, Paul said that he was at work all day and didn't think he went home for lunch, but now the story has changed.
    Whatever was happening that morning that kept Joran from school and Paul from work centred around Montanja 19 and most likely Joran's apt.
       
    The truth is coming out  and it sounds as if Shango and Simian knew what they were talking about.
    P.S.  In the PVDS statement - the part about Charles Croes looking into Joran's eyes and knowing ...(then the next page is missing)  I take that to mean a bad thing.  I doubt CC thought Joran was innocent .


    I agree Leslie.  Paulus made it look like he was out of the house in the morning.  He never left his house.  They were all at the Van der Sloot residence.  The maid lied with her schedule this way she can verify and say Paulus was not home in the morning.  Every other day she arrived later.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 01:55:47 PM
    Paulus knows something bad happened in his home and he has to protect the crime scene and make sure everything was clean.  He would never leave the house without Joran.  Paulus knew that Joran was in the house when Beth arrived.  Joran was hiding just like daddy does.  Joran was there with Deepak and Freddy.  JMO.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: the big hammer on October 23, 2006, 01:57:10 PM
    100 Guilders

    pvds statement:  "...At the bank I deposited the money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately 500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he had taken over my place in the tournament..."

    So joran pays his own father 100 guilders for his father's seat at the "free" poker tournament.  This is after joran has already blown his chances in tournament and is knocked out.  And of course, young joran has no job from which he would draw an honest day's pay.

    BUT, pvds expects joran to "pay him back" for the seat which paulus is vacating because, as he later indicates, he has to go home to attend to the younger brothers, so joran can continue to play and gamble.

    HHhhmmm.

    The value exchange is not working for me here.

    Why would joran have to pay his father back, when it's Paulus' schedule which is causing his departure?  And why would an unemployed son have to pay his father back for something as innocuous as this -- it certainly is not a "loan" or anything like it.

    100 guilders = $57 US dollars.

    $57 bucks joran "gave to" Paulus.  

    How much money do you think Natalee Holloway was carrying when she entered the car of deepak kalope?

    $57 bucks seems about right.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 01:59:12 PM
    follow the money literally


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 02:00:42 PM
    I think you've hit on it Hammer...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 02:02:17 PM
    i dont think PAULASS ever attempted to go the bank the first time he says he did


    it is a LOAD of BS

    thats like people leaving their JOB to go to the bank and after the trouble of leaving the job and going to the bank, getting in the car, driving to the bank getting the deposit ready, you arrive there and instead of waiting 10 minutes for the line to get smaller YOU LEAVE the BANK............

    uhhhhhhhhhh  NOPE


    what were you REALLY doing SWEAT HOG ?? 8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 02:06:58 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Paulus knows something bad happened in his home and he has to protect the crime scene and make sure everything was clean.  He would never leave the house without Joran.  Paulus knew that Joran was in the house when Beth arrived.  Joran was hiding just like daddy does.  Joran was there with Deepak and Freddy.  JMO.


    Remember we were told that Deepak's car was there earlier in the evening ?  I am thinking they were warned that Beth and group were on the way and quickly Deepak & Joran jumped into his car and drove off....maybe parked behind the property, out of sight...then Paulus takes everyone on that wild goose chase and when they return, Joran & Deepak are back, with Deepak leaning on his car...they were behind the Sloot Compound in the dark all along I bet.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 02:09:48 PM
    WARNING !!   this is a LIE

    you have been warned

    DO NOT LOOK DIRECTLY at the LIE, it might make you PUKE

    HERE is the LIE - you have been warned !!


    To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
    Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
    The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
    08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
    to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
    having made any transaction and went back to work



    so you leave work to go to the bank, you actually LEAVE your job for one thing - TO GO TO THE BANK - and the line is too long so you go back to work.

    LIAR LIAR LIAR


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 02:10:52 PM
    where did you go ?

    who did you really meet with ?


    BANK TRIP is a LOAD


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 02:13:26 PM
    i think paulus goes to too many fast food restaurants

    he cant remember where he went for a bite to eat


    mcdonalds or wendys

    DECOY DECOY DECOY


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 02:16:21 PM
    As you know, Lazlo/Victor from FOB and RU has been emailing and speaking with the De Vries people regarding the upcoming show in the Netherlands.  FOB and RU have been busy sending the De Vries people all of the so called Beth lies, etc.

    Lazlo just posted this today:

    De Vries team seems to have made up their mind.

    J2K, that is my conclusion


    Not to long, and the program is not due to air soon, but through the conversation it transpired to me what I mentioned in OP, their cornerpoint (or whatever the correct word is) and therefor further research imo is focus on Joran.

    I ment to say, further research is imo focus on how to prove Joran's guilt, not to prove his innocence.

    That is not their cornerpoint. IMO


    I am sure they are going to put a enough time in this case, but IMO like Hannie said merely to pursue Joran's alleged guilt.
    They have a conclusion/opinion and are building up from there, that is the way it goes in general, look at the boards, I have never seen ppl who believe in Joran's innocence try to find proof that makes him look guilty or the other way around; Joran's possible innocence discussed at BFN.

    People have an opinion based upon a feeling (or something else) and go from there.



    I take this as excellent news!  Keep in mind, the Dutch posters have raved about this guy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: blah on October 23, 2006, 02:17:54 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    WARNING !!   this is a LIE

    you have been warned

    DO NOT LOOK DIRECTLY at the LIE, it might make you PUKE

    HERE is the LIE - you have been warned !!


    To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
    Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
    The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
    08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
    to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
    having made any transaction and went back to work



    so you leave work to go to the bank, you actually LEAVE your job for one thing - TO GO TO THE BANK - and the line is too long so you go back to work.

    LIAR LIAR LIAR


    going to the bank was probably just an excuse he gave to his boss for sneaking out of work for a little while.  He realized there would be no record of him going to the bank so he concocted the story that he left because the line was too long.

    He didnt goto the bank, he went to help Joran cover-up before Anita got home or before the other boys got home or whatever....


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 02:19:01 PM
    Quote from: "blah"
    Quote from: "robots"
    WARNING !!   this is a LIE

    you have been warned

    DO NOT LOOK DIRECTLY at the LIE, it might make you PUKE

    HERE is the LIE - you have been warned !!


    To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
    Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
    The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
    08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
    to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
    having made any transaction and went back to work



    so you leave work to go to the bank, you actually LEAVE your job for one thing - TO GO TO THE BANK - and the line is too long so you go back to work.

    LIAR LIAR LIAR


    going to the bank was probably just an excuse he gave to his boss for sneaking out of work for a little while.  He realized there would be no record of him going to the bank so he concocted the story that he left because the line was too long.

    He didnt goto the bank, he went to help Joran cover-up before Anita got home or before the other boys got home or whatever....



    B
    I
    N
    G
    O

     8)


    Title: What a man of integrity!
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 02:29:23 PM
    One more thought on the VDS banking procedures - wouldn't Papa have access to his minor son's banking card and PIN?  I know that, at my bank, all simple transactions can be done at the ATM machines located inside the same building but outside the actual bank and accessable 24 hours a day.   If the money deposit was so important on that Monday morning, why didn't the busy lawyer stop off on his way to work or make a mental note to himself to remember to do it so on the way home  The whole banking story sounds nutty and even the investigating officers didn't seem to believe it.  Paul certainly slept soundly that night for a guy who didn't even put in a full day at work on Monday.  Maybe Paul failed to become a judge because of his chronic leaves of absence for personal banking.  I tend to believe that Paul went to work, said bondia to everyone, shut the door to his office and took off out the back.   He had to create an alibi and then get home to make sure that the "maids" didn't try to enter Joran's private domain.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: sharon on October 23, 2006, 02:55:10 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    As you know, Lazlo/Victor from FOB and RU has been emailing and speaking with the De Vries people regarding the upcoming show in the Netherlands.  FOB and RU have been busy sending the De Vries people all of the so called Beth lies, etc.

    Lazlo just posted this today:

    De Vries team seems to have made up their mind.

    J2K, that is my conclusion


    Not to long, and the program is not due to air soon, but through the conversation it transpired to me what I mentioned in OP, their cornerpoint (or whatever the correct word is) and therefor further research imo is focus on Joran.

    I ment to say, further research is imo focus on how to prove Joran's guilt, not to prove his innocence.

    That is not their cornerpoint. IMO


    I am sure they are going to put a enough time in this case, but IMO like Hannie said merely to pursue Joran's alleged guilt.
    They have a conclusion/opinion and are building up from there, that is the way it goes in general, look at the boards, I have never seen ppl who believe in Joran's innocence try to find proof that makes him look guilty or the other way around; Joran's possible innocence discussed at BFN.

    People have an opinion based upon a feeling (or something else) and go from there.



    I take this as excellent news!  Keep in mind, the Dutch posters have raved about this guy.


     :D

    Thanks so much for sharing this klaas.

    HOPE. What a feeling!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: bleachedblack on October 23, 2006, 02:56:25 PM
    Good afternoon Monkeys. I have been reading, and think I am finally caught up. You have been busy littly monkeys in the cage. :lol:

    One thing I read I would like to comment on was about Natalee and the $50
    she was given by Beth.

    The big hammer wrote;
    Quote

    Long ago I indicated that the $100 (or possibly $50) Natalee was given by Beth prior to trip was likely traceable because she gave Natalee bank issued wrapped money (single US dollars for tips) that were NEW. And new bills are issued in serial format.


    I remember that $50 still being in the hotel room at the time Greta and Beth went to Natalee's room. I recall Beth saying she had obtained new clean bills for Natalee to use for tipping purposes, but they were found in her room. Is there an additional/different $50. you are speculating she may have been carrying? [/b]


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 03:00:52 PM
    Quote from: "the big hammer"
    100 Guilders

    pvds statement:  "...At the bank I deposited the money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately 500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he had taken over my place in the tournament..."

    So joran pays his own father 100 guilders for his father's seat at the "free" poker tournament.  This is after joran has already blown his chances in tournament and is knocked out.  And of course, young joran has no job from which he would draw an honest day's pay.

    BUT, pvds expects joran to "pay him back" for the seat which paulus is vacating because, as he later indicates, he has to go home to attend to the younger brothers, so joran can continue to play and gamble.

    HHhhmmm.

    The value exchange is not working for me here.

    Why would joran have to pay his father back, when it's Paulus' schedule which is causing his departure?  And why would an unemployed son have to pay his father back for something as innocuous as this -- it certainly is not a "loan" or anything like it.

    100 guilders = $57 US dollars.

    $57 bucks joran "gave to" Paulus.  

    How much money do you think Natalee Holloway was carrying when she entered the car of deepak kalope?

    $57 bucks seems about right.
    .


    I had the same thought when you mentioned this exchange, earlier.  I thought Joran played for his father until he lost, anyway...so where did these winnings come from?  Or am I mistaken?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: msmarple on October 23, 2006, 03:02:21 PM
    Re. the money Natalee had - I remember Beth & Greta (?) in Nat's HI room, and Beth showing that virtually all the money Nat started out with was still there. It was $200 - $300. And I *thought* one of the MB kids said she thought Natalee took $50 with her that night.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 03:02:40 PM
    Klaas: I don't read the Lazlo/Victor posting about the deVries TV show in the same positive way you do.  It  says to me "I ment to say, further research is imo focus on how to prove Joran's guilt, not to prove his innocence. That is not their cornerpoint. "   and this..."De Vries team seems to have made up their mind. "
    It says to me that they have made up their (collective) mind that Joran is not guilty.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:06:32 PM
    We all know the stats on missing persons is astronomically high for the last to be seen with being involved.  I think it is actually close to 80% of the time this is the case.  Please someone with the actual stat correct me for that is a guess from memory.

    Add to it the repeated lying, changing of stories, have done this 20 times before and all the rest.

    So statistically that would put the probability of Joran being involved and guilty at about what?  I count 110%, lol, never was good at math,  :D

     Nothing I think or ever conclude is based on "emotion" in a situation such as this.  It is insulting and ludicrous for those haters to imply that for that is their basis for hating Beth.  Emotion, much of which they feel is jealousy and inferiority because they know there is no light shining in their own eyes.

    And much as I admire and just adore Beth, I would not allow a mother who has been put through what she has been to dictate what I think.  I may be wrong but I believe I speak for many on this if not the majority.  To say we form opinion from emotion just smacks of sheer stupidity and failure to ever read how we come to a conclusion.  We find what we can about it and certainly do not go with just emotion and do not ask Beth what to think as has been suggested.

    Now where is that deVries email address.  I think we should tell him about the little boy with the same last name for bet he has never heard of that one and my heart aches for that mother as well.

    Dave said he could forgive and if he could, I could.  And they just about spit in his face in response.  That alone tells me there is something to hide.  If I could find a reason, any reason to think Joran innocent, I'd go look at that but where is it?  Somebody show me things that point in that direction because I can't find a single one.

    End of Rant


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 23, 2006, 03:06:55 PM
    From Joran's 6/9/05 statement:

    On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too.[/b]

    The statement then goes on to the Black Jack table & meeting the girls, etc.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 03:07:08 PM
    Quote from: "Leslie"
    Klaas: I don't read the Lazlo/Victor posting about the deVries TV show in the same positive way you do.  It  says to me "I ment to say, further research is imo focus on how to prove Joran's guilt, not to prove his innocence. That is not their cornerpoint. "   and this..."De Vries team seems to have made up their mind. "
    It says to me that they have made up their (collective) mind that Joran is not guilty.


    NO, I don't think so.  You have to read all the comments after.  Lazlo and RU/FOB were sending information to De Vries.  Lazlos spoke by phone to the De Vries people this morning.  Lazlo believes that they think Joran is guilty.

    There have been long threads at both RU and FOB regarding sending De Vries the littany of Beth's lies (their words, not mine).


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 03:08:46 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    We all know the stats on missing persons is astronomically high for the last to be seen with being involved.  I think it is actually close to 80% of the time this is the case.  Please someone with the actual stat correct me for that is a guess from memory.

    Add to it the repeated lying, changing of stories, have done this 20 times before and all the rest.

    So statistically that would put the probability of Joran being involved and guilty at about what?  I count 110%, lol, never was good at math,  :D

     Nothing I think or ever conclude is based on "emotion" in a situation such as this.  It is insulting and ludicrous for those haters to imply that for that is their basis for hating Beth.  Emotion, much of which they feel is jealousy and inferiority because they know there is no light shining in their own eyes.

    And much as I admire and just adore Beth, I would not allow a mother who has been put through what she has been to dictate what I think.  I may be wrong but I believe I speak for many on this if not the majority.  To say we form opinion from emotion just smacks of sheer stupidity and failure to ever read how we come to a conclusion.  We find what we can about it and certainly do not go with just emotion and do not ask Beth what to think as has been suggested.

    Now where is that deVries email address.  I think we should tell him about the little boy with the same last name for bet he has never heard of that one and my heart aches for that mother as well.

    Dave said he could forgive and if he could, I could.  And they just about spit in his face in response.  That alone tells me there is something to hide.  If I could find a reason, any reason to think Joran innocent, I'd go look at that but where is it?  Somebody show me things that point in that direction because I can't find a single one.

    End of Rant


    nice rant

    you wont find anything pointing to JORAN being innocent

    it does not exist unless anita hid it in her bra  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:10:32 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Good afternoon Monkeys. I have been reading, and think I am finally caught up. You have been busy littly monkeys in the cage. :lol:

    One thing I read I would like to comment on was about Natalee and the $50
    she was given by Beth.

    The big hammer wrote;
    Quote

    Long ago I indicated that the $100 (or possibly $50) Natalee was given by Beth prior to trip was likely traceable because she gave Natalee bank issued wrapped money (single US dollars for tips) that were NEW. And new bills are issued in serial format.


    I remember that $50 still being in the hotel room at the time Greta and Beth went to Natalee's room. I recall Beth saying she had obtained new clean bills for Natalee to use for tipping purposes, but they were found in her room. Is there an additional/different $50. you are speculating she may have been carrying? [/b]



    Hi there, Bleachedblack!  

    Good to see you today.  Yes, it is a different $50 for the girlfriends said they all took that amount, their drivers license and key card and that was about all, no purses.

    I tend to think if getting new bills one would get all the money in the new currency or the bank would just give it to  you like that.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 03:14:20 PM
    Klaas:  OK!  That's why there is a call to all good RU posters to get their "truth" to the deVries people ASAP.  Let's hope those morons get the proper response to their collective piece of fiction.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 03:17:31 PM
    Quote from: "Leslie"
    Klaas:  OK!  That's why there is a call to all good RU posters to get their "truth" to the deVries people ASAP.  Let's hope those morons get the proper response to their collective piece of fiction.

    Yes but the original deadline was this morning. Lazlo spoke with them this morning.  Sounds like they are going to email stuff anyway because they are fools.  They don't realize how obsurd what they will be sending is.  De Vries is a professional, he will see through it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 03:20:16 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Leslie"
    Klaas:  OK!  That's why there is a call to all good RU posters to get their "truth" to the deVries people ASAP.  Let's hope those morons get the proper response to their collective piece of fiction.

    Yes but the original deadline was this morning. Lazlo spoke with them this morning.  Sounds like they are going to email stuff anyway because they are fools.  They don't realize how obsurd what they will be sending is.  De Vries is a professional, he will see through it.


    he will see it like a GIANT ELEPHANT in the middle of the room
     8)


    May 31st Joran Signed Statement

    where is it ? :twisted:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 03:22:20 PM
    whats the difference between the WORLD'S BIGGEST LIAR
    and PAULUS ??





    nothing, they are one and the same  8)  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: sharon on October 23, 2006, 03:27:03 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"

    Yes but the original deadline was this morning. Lazlo spoke with them this morning.  Sounds like they are going to email stuff anyway because they are fools.  They don't realize how obsurd what they will be sending is.  De Vries is a professional, he will see through it.


    Ahhhh. Hope -- again :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: bleachedblack on October 23, 2006, 03:28:11 PM
    Anna thank-you for the explaination. I thought I was missing something in my understanding of what was being said.

    By-the way Anna on a personal note Bestbuddy sends her regards. She also wants me to tell you that the little white dog in your signature is the absolute cutest thing!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 03:33:32 PM
    I wonder if the RU will provide the "deVries" people with their video collection of Natalee at the gas station, in the jewelry store and in the hallway of the Holiday Inn?    
    Paul was doing so much stalling that morning of May 31, 2005.  Even after he got the entire gang down to the Wyndham and "discovered' Joran was not there and then phoned to find out that his errant son was back at the house due to a misunderstanding; Paul pointed out some tall stranger (over there... see?) and pretended that he might be Joran.   The fact that Paul and Joran are free men today is mind-boggling.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:38:44 PM
    .
    I can't believe those people actually called deCries office and tried to convince him of that absolutely asinine list of their of "Lies of Beth" when they are distortions of what she said or exaggerations.  For instance if she says she had not eaten for the first few days, they will find she was in a restaurant and that proves she was lying.

    Absolutely nothing but twisting of details and minutiea that is just beyond the pale.  Nothng of any substance even, just anything to try to make her look as bad as their heroes the Sloots.

    But if the program has already cut off and gone into production, too late.  But it would not have mattered for they don't have a thing to counter the glaring facts.  Nada, zilch.  Joran was last seen with Natalee and has lied incessantly ever since.They have already praised this guy to the max and their turning on him in this one case is astounding rank hypocrisy.

    Hey!  Maybe word got to JORAN.ANGRY! and that is what he is angry about!  Well, Jor, whadda ya expect??  Only your mommy and Aunt Greta and Aunt Julia believe those lies.  You are not even good at lying, silly boy!  I've encountered bright eight year olds who could lie circles around you and your sweaty old man both.  We are not nearly as stupid as you have been led to believe.  

    (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/21jsmdf_th.png)

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: bleachedblack on October 23, 2006, 03:39:13 PM
    I have a hard to explain feeling that Paulus days might be numbered......
    hard to put a finger on it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: the big hammer on October 23, 2006, 03:40:44 PM
    PVDS: Desperate to make a "Deposit" at CMB

    This banking activity is highly suspicious.  According to pvds June 23 statement:

    1.  05.45 hours is the normal time for the alarm to go off and I wake up. The children I wake up at approximately 06.00 hours. I awakened Valentijn, Sebastian and Joran.

    So far seems like a normal morning in the sloot slum.  pvds wakes up to alarm at 05:45.

    2.  ...if I tell you all the things I did on that Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work. The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately 08.00 hours.
    OK.  So now, after rousing the kiddies from their beds and making them some breakfast, etc and trundling the lads off to school, pvds arrives at work at 8:00am.  So by this we assume, he is in his office, presumabaly in Orangstead at this time.

    3.  I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without having made any transaction and went back to work.

    After two hours at the desk, pvds decides it's time to make a bank visit.  So Paulus arrives at the CMB Bank at 10:00am to find the lines too long and not worth the wait.  During this visit, we must assume that Paulus is visiting the CMB branch in Orangstead, because, after all he is at work nearby and he claims to return to work:

    http://www.cmbnv.com/main_branch.php

    Addressing some previous posts, I would say it's highly likely that Paulus was in bank at this stated time.  Banks have the latest in surveillance equipment and technology and it's constantly deployed and in use -- especially during banking hours.  Hence, it's more than likely that Paulus appears on the bank security tapes.

    4.  I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

    So now Paulus does some work and at 3:00pm (12.00 hours -- military time is noon) he decides it's time to retry banking so he leaves the office (early) and heads to the Noord CMB branch and arrives there at 3:30pm.  Note, Paulus has not gone to bank during lunch hour, as is customary and usual, and he leaves work very early.  Note too, that Paulus elects to travel 1/2 hour all the way back to Noord to make a $285 bank deposit.

    CMB Noord branch: http://www.cmbnv.com/noord.php

    5. To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
    or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
    remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.


    OK.  So Paulus goes directly to bank.  It takes about 1/2 hour to drive from Orangstead to Noord, according to him at this time of day.

    6.  After depositing the money I went home. I cannot exactly remember what time it was when I got home. I think it was 16.15 hours. According to me both Rita and Joran where at home.

    So, about 4:15pm, Paulus arrives home and both Rita and Joran are there.  Looks like he cut his work day short, and knew he was doing so ahead of time, as he drove to Noord to do the banking.  And then went straight home.

    **************************************

    All in all, this is an awful lot of effort to make a $285 deposit.  

    And it's also odd that Rita the maid is at the sloot house when she testifies that she left that day at noon:

    "On your question if I can tell you specifically when I worked from Monday up to and including Friday at the family Van Der Sloot, I answer the following: I work on Monday from 08.00 till 12.00. "

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: bleachedblack on October 23, 2006, 03:45:04 PM
    I am not a person who follows any organized, or recognized religion. I pray, and I believe in a God. I am sure many here have seen Beth's Hour of power video........but I would wager to say there is no person that can watch this video and feel Beth is lying about anything. IMO.

    http://www.hourofpower.org/video/video.cfm


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:45:28 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Anna thank-you for the explanation. I thought I was missing something in my understanding of what was being said.

    By-the way Anna on a personal note Bestbuddy sends her regards. She also wants me to tell you that the little white dog in your signature is the absolute cutest thing!



    My best right back at her and thanks for the compliment on the dogs.  The little girl in the red dress is not mine and I don't have that breed but wish she were.  Might be too much of a princess for around here, however!

    And I do remember Natalee had that banded $50 in $1 for tips that I believe Jug said he got for her as well.  Guess she was not one of the big tippers, lol.  Kids are usually embarrassed to tip I have found or they don't understand how or why.  I thought I was the only one who got those $1 for that and mine have every time brought them back home undistributed.  I don't know why for they are not stingy at all but think they felt awkward tipping.  

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 03:50:11 PM
    Quote from: "blah"


    4:30 PM = On 6-20 ANDRE MONTIVAL AOKI DOS SANTOS (a.k.a. “Dre”) stated to the ARUBAN Police:

    <QUOTE>

    On your question if I on Sunday, May 29 2005, met Joran, Deepak and Satish, I answer you the following:

    On Sunday, May 29, 2005, around 16:30, I met Joran in the Excelsior casino of the Holiday Inn hotel. The moment I met Joran I was in the company of my father called "Montival SANTOS". Joran was in the company of father named “Paul” that is when my father and I met them in the “Excelsior Casino”. On that day we played in a "Texas Hold'm poker Tournament". Joran was first to be eliminated from the tournament. I no longer remember at what time Joran lost. I saw that Joran then played "black-Jack" and I continued play poker. After I was eliminated from the poker game I went over to Joran who was still sitting at the black-jack table. I no longer remember what time I left the poker table. When I stood beside Joran, I saw that there was a group of American students who were on holiday in Aruba talking. I saw that Joran helped one of the girls play black-jack. Joran told me that he was busy helping the girl with black-jack because according to Joran she had lost much money. After Joran helped the girl, Joran and I walked around in the Excelsior casino. I saw the group girls who were playing black-Jack with Joran walk by and I heard the girls say he should go to Carlos & Charlies later in the evening hours because they would like to meet him there. Joran answered for them not to worry, he would go. On Sunday, May 29, 2005 in the evening hours, after the Texas Hold'm poker Tournament at the Excelsior casino I ran into “Elvis KELLY ", and his wife "Gladys” and we all got into my fathers pick up and drove away. My father acted as a driver for our two passengers in his green pick-up of the make Ford Ranger, license plate number "A-23793". We drove first to Wendy's Palm Beach to buy food and after we had eaten, my father dropped off Elvis and Gladys at their home. Elvis and Gladys live in the hamlet Noord. I don’t know their address but I can designate to you their house. After we dropped Elvis and wife at their home my father and I went home. I no longer remember what time we got home. I studied first and afterwards slept because I had a "physics" examination to take on Monday, May 30, 2005, from 07.30 till 10.00. I do recall that Joran asked me if I wanted to accompany him to Carlos & Charlies but I answered him that I could not go because I had an examination the next day.


    <END QUOTE>


    Interesting that Andre doesn't mention Joran taking Paulus's place when Paulus had to leave or that Joran won money in that tournament. But he does mention that Joran was the first to lose out of the tourny.  Then when Andre lost he found Joran at the BlackJack table with the MB girls.  

    Bunch of hooey and ALE doesn't bother to follow-up with more questions.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:50:34 PM
    O/T

    Klaas,
    The baby panda is perfectly posed and smiling in her sleep.  Any way you could get me a quick screen shot?  Sorry. .  . . . :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:53:56 PM
    Be back later. . . .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 03:53:56 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    O/T

    Klaas,
    The baby panda is perfectly posed and smiling in her sleep.  Any way you could get me a quick screen shot?  Sorry. .  . . . :oops:


    Trying, I'm getting a blank screen right now.  Will keep trying.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 03:55:14 PM
    2 years
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    O/T

    Klaas,
    The baby panda is perfectly posed and smiling in her sleep.  Any way you could get me a quick screen shot?  Sorry. .  . . . :oops:


    Trying, I'm getting a blank screen right now.  Will keep trying.


    Mine went out too!  If you can get it fine but know you are too busy to keep trying.  Just if you think about it, no biggie.  She will be there for a while.   :D 2years I think.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 03:58:09 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    O/T

    Klaas,
    The baby panda is perfectly posed and smiling in her sleep.  Any way you could get me a quick screen shot?  Sorry. .  . . . :oops:


    Trying, I'm getting a blank screen right now.  Will keep trying.

    Still nothing.  Are you still getting the cam ok?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 04:05:37 PM
    I know you all seem to be focusing on PVDS statement about that bank as some sort or suspicous activity at the bank itself, but I think the bank is just being used as a ruse to excuse PVDS absence from the office.

    When I think of banking and queues I only think of 'Drive Thru' and yes frequently there can be daunting queues there. So PVDS can say he had gone to the bank thinking no one could verify if he was actually there or not because he didn't stop because of the long 'Drive Thru' queues. I know drive thru is never mentioned, but still, going to the bank for me, only means drive thru.

    Later when he says he left again for the bank it could have been 'Drive Thru' or outside ATM, again to cover for other activities that may have also taken place that day.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 04:07:19 PM
    Well over a year ago I posted about my suspicions that Paulus was involved in the money laundering business on Aruba, using the casinos to move the cash.  Now we have Paulus' own statement that he made two visits to the Bank of Aruba on one day--once at 10 am and again at 3:30 pm.  This is just my own suspicion, and I have no evidence, but I would bet a big bill that this was a regular run for Paulus.  I wonder if PVDS regularly made morning and afternoon bank drops, and at different branches, too.  It's just all too convenient.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: bleachedblack on October 23, 2006, 04:11:37 PM
    Quote from: "AZLady"
    Well over a year ago I posted about my suspicions that Paulus was involved in the money laundering business on Aruba, using the casinos to move the cash.  Now we have Paulus' own statement that he made two visits to the Bank of Aruba on one day--once at 10 am and again at 3:30 pm.  This is just my own suspicion, and I have no evidence, but I would bet a big bill that this was a regular run for Paulus.  I wonder if PVDS regularly made morning and afternoon bank drops, and at different branches, too.  It's just all too convenient.


    I think that too is the likely case. Paulus had to find a ligit reason for explaining why he had to go to the bank twice in one day. His explaination would not seem justified considering the time it would take to drive there and back 2X. the logical thing would have been to wait in line in the drive through, or go inside?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 04:13:41 PM
    i wish we coudl find out something like the BANK was closed that day


    due to construction, or decontamination  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 04:14:07 PM
    I get the impression from his statement that he went to see a particular teller to handle his transaction.  After all, if you are frequently depositing large amounts of money, twice a day, into different accounts, banks get very, very suspicious.  Unless, of course, you are using a teller who knows how to handle the cash deposits and what accounts to put them in.  

    PVDS is so involved in the money-laundering on that island that its practically a glowing neon sign on his forhead!  Frequent gambling in the casinos--on a civil servant's salary?  Not unless you are gambling with the casinos money.  Frequent travel to Holland, the US and other countries--not on a civil servant's salary.  An attorney who can handle the accounting is a valuable team player.  He was compensated well.  He also knows who does what and to whom.  Valuable information for a man in his middle-management position.  PVDS is so guilty of money-laundering that even the Arubans are having trouble looking the other way.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 04:15:32 PM
    humph, i wonder if the SWEAT HOG is sweating today  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 04:17:05 PM
    PAULUS leaves work to go to the BANK at 10 am ??????????

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


    paulus the squalus, that is a TERRIBLE LIE  :twisted:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 04:18:00 PM
    Pualus SECRET MISSION was to pick up the "LOST SNEAKERS"


     8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 04:18:04 PM
    And, the next obvious question is why doesn't the Aruban Prosecutor subpoena the bank records of Joran and PVDS?  We all know the answer to that one.  She's in this up to her neck and beginning to choke on it.

    Gee, do you think the de Vries people will get the banking records on PVDS and gambling son, JVDS?  I hope so.  I hope the Bank of Aruba decides to investigate PVDS's banking.  That won't happen, but at least the Dutch have decided they will not loan these Aruban banks any more money.  Think they have a clue?  hmmmm....


    Title: O/T sorta
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 04:19:10 PM
    I remember being a naive 18 year old living on my own in Toronto and steady dating a guy named Tom.  Tom lived about a mile away from me and would pass by my place most mornings to drive me to work as we both worked downtown.   One Thursday morning, I saw a parking ticket on the dashboard and looked at it while my boyfriend was in the coffee shop - it was from the night before and named a street just off Yonge St.
    which is the main drag in Toronto.  My boyfriend had finished telling me about his evening of watching the hockey game on TV with the "boys" in the west end.    When he returned to the car and I asked him if he had gone straight home after and he said "of course, why?" I asked him "how did you get a parking ticket, last night, downtown?"  A simple explanation: he loaned his car to a friend named Roy and he had parked in an alley behind the bar and got the ticket.  So the next time I saw Roy, I asked him if he had paid Tom back.  Roy didn't know what I was talking about and Tom admitted that all the "boys" had gone downtown for one drink but that he couldn't tell me the truth because I might think he was cheating on me!!  I replied that I hadn't thought of that but now that you mention it...did you?  He would NEVER do that.   :lol:   That happened in the first month I knew him and it only got worse.  He could never remember all his lies and I used to have an excellent memory and would catch him every time.  He would even change his story as he was telling it.  " You did do that ?  I thought you said you didn't do that?  I used to wonder how anyone could lie so easily until one morning when Tom did not show up at the usual time for the drive to work and I called his house and asked his father if Tom had left.  His father told me he would ask Tom and came back on the phone to say that Tom was in bed and he was sick and not going to work.  I had to rush to get to the subway and ran out my front door and there was Tom sitting in his car asking me why wasn't I ready to leave.  
    The point of this trip down memory lane is that one learns about honesty from the parents and if they are liars the kids will have a problem with the truth also.  I see it in Paul, Anita and Joran.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 04:20:43 PM
    Wouldn't you think that since Paulus brought up his two visits to the bank the day after Natalee disappeared, that the Prosecutor would subpoena those records?  Just to verify his statements, you know.  Actually, wouldn't you think the Prosecutor might want to take a look at PVDS's records and the bank video from the entire month before and after the crime?  Our authorities would do that.  So, what's Aruba waiting for?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 04:23:10 PM
    paulus cant remember mcdonalds or wendys ??

    maybe he went to BURGER KING, you can tell,, er uhh i mean you can get whoppers there.



     :twisted:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: nonesuche on October 23, 2006, 04:25:21 PM
    this is for you robots  :lol:

    use it with my blessing  8)

    (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Liars.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 04:25:34 PM
    Quote from: "AZLady"
    Wouldn't you think that since Paulus brought up his two visits to the bank the day after Natalee disappeared, that the Prosecutor would subpoena those records?  Just to verify his statements, you know.  Actually, wouldn't you think the Prosecutor might want to take a look at PVDS's records and the bank video from the entire month before and after the crime?  Our authorities would do that.  So, what's Aruba waiting for?

    Maybe she did?  It's possible alot of things were done we aren't aware of.  Doesn't mean they wouldn't destroy anything incriminating though.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 04:25:46 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    this is for you robots  :lol:

    use it with my blessing  8)

    (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Liars.gif)


    i like

    tanks  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: nonesuche on October 23, 2006, 04:27:45 PM
    Quote from: "AZLady"
    Wouldn't you think that since Paulus brought up his two visits to the bank the day after Natalee disappeared, that the Prosecutor would subpoena those records?  Just to verify his statements, you know.  Actually, wouldn't you think the Prosecutor might want to take a look at PVDS's records and the bank video from the entire month before and after the crime?  Our authorities would do that.  So, what's Aruba waiting for?


    The family of Natalee to go away unfortunately......


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: nonesuche on October 23, 2006, 04:30:15 PM
    FInally having these statements to review, one of two things occurred when Janssen took "evidence" before the judge.....

    either she didn't present the discrepancies adequately OR she didn't present them - no other alternatives IMO......well there is a third......every judge was corrupt and in Paulus' back pocket?

    take your pick, I'd like to know which is which myself  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 04:35:02 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    this is for you robots  :lol:

    use it with my blessing  8)

    (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Liars.gif)


    Made it a little smaller  :wink:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: sharon on October 23, 2006, 04:36:36 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    I have a hard to explain feeling that Paulus days might be numbered......
    hard to put a finger on it.


    You explained it well enough to make me smile :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 04:37:48 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    FInally having these statements to review, one of two things occurred when Janssen took "evidence" before the judge.....

    either she didn't present the discrepancies adequately OR she didn't present them - no other alternatives IMO......well there is a third......every judge was corrupt and in Paulus' back pocket?

    take your pick, I'd like to know which is which myself  :roll:


    Well, with the Nov 1, date looming for a decision so PVDS can get his suit for damages completed, I think I'd pic #3.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: nonesuche on October 23, 2006, 04:38:29 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    this is for you robots  :lol:

    use it with my blessing  8)

    (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Liars.gif)


    Made it a little smaller  :wink:  :lol:


     :P  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 04:41:05 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    FInally having these statements to review, one of two things occurred when Janssen took "evidence" before the judge.....

    either she didn't present the discrepancies adequately OR she didn't present them - no other alternatives IMO......well there is a third......every judge was corrupt and in Paulus' back pocket?

    take your pick, I'd like to know which is which myself  :roll:

    They are all in on it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 04:51:20 PM
    Reply to the big hammer:   I understand the kids get on the schoolbus at 6:30 AM.  I read it that Paul leaves the house to travel to work at 8:00 AM ( 1 1/2 hours to prepare for work) and that he was at the bank at 10:00 AM in Noord so it looks like he could claim 1 hour of lawyering before his rush to deposit the ill gotten money.  Who would want to risk carrying around the huge sum of 500 guilders and no fool would leave such a fortune in their desk drawer.  I am surprised that the bank doesn't have a special quickie queue for deposits of 500 guilders or more.   He went all the way to Noord and couldn't do his banking.  Don't you hate when that happens?  It is very suspicious and sounds a lot like Joran driving past the "big house" with Natalee - but not going in.  In the vicinity of their "slum" but not within the walls.  As the young people  say - I call bullshit on their storys.  Both guilty.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 04:52:58 PM
    Has anyone heard from

    Flying Mermaid

    Easywriter

    Jossy

    lately?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 05:03:56 PM
    Yeah, hope I didn't have anything to do with FM being gone, I know we had quite a spirited discussion one night, that I thought was all in jest and having fun.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 05:06:22 PM
    I would like to hear what Jossy knows now.  I do believe that guy has a way of ferreting out information on the island that others can't get.  What a guy.  I like Jossy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 05:11:54 PM
    Quote from: "SunFreak2"
    Has anyone heard from

    Flying Mermaid

    Easywriter

    Jossy

    lately?


    Flying Mermaid - I'm not sure
    Easywriter - He may have been put on a "time out"
    Jossy - Last I heard he was still in Florida but would be returning to Aruba soon, he may be in Aruba now..not sure.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 05:14:26 PM
    jossy was here ?

     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 05:16:29 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    jossy was here ?

     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    Jossy spends a great deal of time in the USA, he went to school here.  I believe he has doctors in the Miami area.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 05:19:06 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    jossy was here ?

     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


    Jossy was relayed thru Easy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 05:20:09 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    jossy was here ?

     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    Jossy spends a great deal of time in the USA, he went to school here.  I believe he has doctors in the Miami area.


    ok, i understand now
    but does he read here

    JOSSY ROCKS  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 05:20:38 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "robots"
    jossy was here ?

     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


    Jossy was relayed thru Easy.


    ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    thank you :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 05:22:11 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    See that focus was still on when we heard Joran picked up his father at the airport on 5/29/05:  I could also swear I recall Anita  on TV, perhaps from Holland or immediately upon her return saying 'we were at a family function in Holland'...can't find it though.  Found this interview, however:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160471,00.html

    Partial quote:

    ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...

    Satish Kalpoe was probably only a few months older than Joran.  Notice how Anita points out that her young sporter is a Kid and Satish is a man.  Joran was about two months shy of his 18th Birthday already drinking, gambling, drugging and smoking like a man.  What is the difference between Satish and Joran?  To me there is no difference they were both in high school and already criminals.


    Back late.  Haven't read through...but I believe they emphasized this point to K2 and I also believe when Anita said "there were adults there" she was refering to K2... I believe it was a way to threaten K2 and keep them in line...IMO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 05:24:48 PM
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    See that focus was still on when we heard Joran picked up his father at the airport on 5/29/05:  I could also swear I recall Anita  on TV, perhaps from Holland or immediately upon her return saying 'we were at a family function in Holland'...can't find it though.  Found this interview, however:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160471,00.html

    Partial quote:

    ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl. Why did they let the boys go? Why didn't they interrogate immediately deep, see wherever any...

    Satish Kalpoe was probably only a few months older than Joran.  Notice how Anita points out that her young sporter is a Kid and Satish is a man.  Joran was about two months shy of his 18th Birthday already drinking, gambling, drugging and smoking like a man.  What is the difference between Satish and Joran?  To me there is no difference they were both in high school and already criminals.


    Back late.  Haven't read through...but I believe they emphasized this point to K2 and I also believe when Anita said "there were adults there" she was refering to K2... I believe it was a way to threaten K2 and keep them in line...IMO


    Yes it was obvious early on the differentiation and threatening of the K2's.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 05:27:32 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Quote from: "San"
    FROM PAULUS 6/23/05 STATEMENT:

    There were long cues at the bank so I left without having made any transaction and went back to work. I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

    Notice how Paulus specifically mentions which bank he went to.  When I go to the bank and I usually tell someone I just say I have to stop at the bank.  Paulus makes it a point to specifically mention which bank.

    I bet this isn't even the bank Paulus went to.


    Next statement also seems contradictory:

    To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
    or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
    remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
    At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
    money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
    the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
    500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
    had taken over my place in the tournament.
    [/b]

    Paulus is stating he deposited $ Joran 'said' he won on 5/29/05, which was approx. 500 Aruban guilders....then he says Joran gave him 100 guilders...which is it 500 or 100?  

    He can't remember if it was the only stop, but he mentions talking to Ruth Dijkhoff, which he had no problem remembering, and it's another detail like mentioning what bank that just doesn't fit the question...


    Well, in the Joe Taco filing...one of the MB affidavids estimates Joran lost ~$250 at the blackjack table....which was after the poker (that he supposedly won the money that PVDS supposedly deposited).  The bank was in Noord...maybe a reason that car was seen by racket clug or pond or house....hmmmm..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 05:30:28 PM
    for some reason PAULUS wants the world to think JORAN is a GREAT POKER PLAYER

    he is a MURDERER not a poker player :evil:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
    Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 05:33:14 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Amanda PORTOCARRERO (maid) 7/28/2005 Statement:

      born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

      - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

      - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them. [/list]

      MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF (MAID) 08/11/05 Statement:

        I have worked ( 8 ) years at family Van Der Sloot. I work as from Monday up to and including Friday for them. I do not work on Saturday and Sunday at family Van Der Sloot. I work daily four (4) hours at family Van Der Sloot. With family VDS, I mean the parents of the detained man "Joran Van Der Sloot". (meaning the suspect "Joran Van Der Sloot"; observation JACOBS).

        On your question if I can tell you specifically when I worked from Monday up to and including Friday at the family Van Der Sloot, I answer the following:
         
        I work on Monday from
      08.00 till 12.00.
      I work on Tuesday from 13.30 till 17.30.
      I work on Wednesday from 13.30 till 17.30.
      I work on Thursday from 13.30 till 15.30
      and I work on Friday from 13.30 till 17.30 at family Van Der Sloot
      As you can see I work daily four (4) hours at family Van Der Sloot with exception of Thursday because then I work only two (2) hours. [/list]

      This maids hours are different only on that Monday Morning.  Joran and Paulus were home.  Was she helping them clean the mess that Joran made.  Was there a different maid there helping?  I think this mail is one fat liar just like her employer.

      I think that Amanda PORTOCARRERO is the missing maid.  They are trying to say she is the woman who heard another maid say she saw sand under Joran's clothes.  This is the actual missing maid.  JMO.


      But, in the PVDS statement, Rita (the maid) was at the house (with Joran) on Monday at 16:30...hmmmm


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 05:48:18 PM
      This is from Joran's statement given on June 14.  He is explaining what he did on Monday, May 31--the night after Natalee disappeared, just before Beth and Jug and friends arrived on the island.

      My tennis lesson was between the hours of 18.00 pm and 19.00 pm. According to me I was not called by anyone during that time. I had also made no calls myself. Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse. After I had finised showering I got dressed. I do not remember what I put on that day. I was wearing a short trousers and a T-shirt. It looked pretty nice/proper. I also wore slippers. Then I called "Andre". I do not remember his phone number. Andre lives near the Marriot Hotel. We had agreed that we would meet at the Wyndham Hotel at approximately 20.00 pm to play poker. I had then also called Guido. Guido had told me that he had to go to work. He would come later and try to enter the tournament for half time. I had also called my father and asked if I could play poker at the Wyndham Casino. My father gave me permission.

      Does anyone recall in Paulus' statement where he expressed surprise that Joran was not home when Beth and Jug arrived at his house?  Paulus did not know where Joran was and called his cell phone.  Paulus really, really has a lousy memory, doesn't he?  He could not recall that his son called him after his tennis lesson to tell him where he would be that night. Amazing, just amazing.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 05:55:31 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      This is from Joran's statement given on June 14.  He is explaining what he did on Monday, May 31--the night after Natalee disappeared, just before Beth and Jug and friends arrived on the island.

      My tennis lesson was between the hours of 18.00 pm and 19.00 pm. According to me I was not called by anyone during that time. I had also made no calls myself. Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse. After I had finised showering I got dressed. I do not remember what I put on that day. I was wearing a short trousers and a T-shirt. It looked pretty nice/proper. I also wore slippers. Then I called "Andre". I do not remember his phone number. Andre lives near the Marriot Hotel. We had agreed that we would meet at the Wyndham Hotel at approximately 20.00 pm to play poker. I had then also called Guido. Guido had told me that he had to go to work. He would come later and try to enter the tournament for half time. I had also called my father and asked if I could play poker at the Wyndham Casino. My father gave me permission.

      Does anyone recall in Paulus' statement where he expressed surprise that Joran was not home when Beth and Jug arrived at his house?  Paulus did not know where Joran was and called his cell phone.  Paulus really, really has a lousy memory, doesn't he?  He could not recall that his son called him after his tennis lesson to tell him where he would be that night. Amazing, just amazing.

      May 31 is Tuesday, the day after Beth and Jug arrived.  Beth and Jug were at the Sloot home in the early morning hours of May 31, but they arrived in Aruba around 11pm May 30th.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 05:55:45 PM
      AZLady:  Paul explains exactly how he felt about Joran being away from the house at 2:30 am , Tuesday, May 31, 2005:

      PVDS: "I then went to Joran's apartment and to my surprise and to my anger he was not in his apartment. I then called him on his mobile phone. He immediately answered his phone. I asked him where he was and the told me he was at the “Wyndham”. That he was at the “Wyndham” did not surprise me at that moment. He was supposed to be playing in the “Free tournament” there. That could also be a clue that I indeed did not see him after I had dropped him off at the “Raquet Club”.
      ---


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 06:00:54 PM
      Scroll to page 100.  Whatley statement....can't cut and paste.

      According to Whatley, Van Der Sloot was helping Ruth McVeigh trying to win $100 at the card table.  Whatley and McVeigh told Van Der Sloot they were going to CAC.  Van Der Sloot told Whatley and McVeigh "CAC sucks" on Sunday Night.  They told Van Der Sloot Sunday was the MBHS students' last night in Aruba. Van Der Sloot left the card table after losing approximately $250. [/b]

      http://www.xs4all.nl/~dugo/doc3.pdf


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 06:05:41 PM
      Klaasend, I think I have the date wrong then.  Joran is describing what he did the evening before Beth and Jug arrived.  My point is that Paulus acts surprised that Joran is not home and calls him to see where he is.  Something doesn't jell here, and Paulus is conviently using a poor memory to cover up.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 06:06:37 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Klaasend, I think I have the date wrong then.  Joran is describing what he did the evening before Beth and Jug arrived.  My point is that Paulus acts surprised that Joran is not home and calls him to see where he is.  Something doesn't jell here, and Paulus is conviently using a poor memory to cover up.

      Yes, if you meant the evening of May 30th then I completely agree.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 06:07:29 PM
      Buckeye, according to witnesses, Joran loses money at the casino, but according to Paulus he wins money and gives it to Paulus to deposit.  This is a game Paulus and Joran play at the casino.  Play and lose, play and win, it doesn't matter because Paulus will make his large cash deposits the next day, regardless.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 06:12:24 PM
      From Crioyo, and old FP poster (from Aruba, I believe in Holland) when asked about Dutch media.  This was several months ago.

      Television there’s Peter R. de Vries who’s a detective who risks his life seeking out criminals and
      airs it on tv in his show. Uses secret camera’s, listening devices etc etc.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

      Let's hope he has some "secret" people tapping the perps/pimps...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 06:16:07 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Buckeye, according to witnesses, Joran loses money at the casino, but according to Paulus he wins money and gives it to Paulus to deposit.  This is a game Paulus and Joran play at the casino.  Play and lose, play and win, it doesn't matter because Paulus will make his large cash deposits the next day, regardless.


      Yep...I would think the depositors (launderers) would know their favorite banker by heart.  I'm sure there's a share of the nonwinnings.  Maybe the call to Guido wasn't to verify Joran won but a request to say he did, to excuse the driving around the bank/Noord.  Too bad other people saw Joran loose his winnings......


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 06:19:41 PM
      Money laundering is a tricky business in that it requires complicity on the parts of the casino cage workers, the casino dealers, the money runners, and the bank tellers, just to mention a few.  However, money laundering seems to be such a blatantly practiced business in Aruba that I don't think they bothered to cover their tracks too well.  I would guess that someone like de Vries and his investigative team might uncover this sort of business fairly easily.  After all, we can see it and we aren't even on that God-forsaken island!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 23, 2006, 06:28:21 PM
      Groningen, Netherlands, has been visiting us for some time now.  Hi to the Netherlands!   :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 06:30:29 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Klaasend, I think I have the date wrong then.  Joran is describing what he did the evening before Beth and Jug arrived.  My point is that Paulus acts surprised that Joran is not home and calls him to see where he is.  Something doesn't jell here, and Paulus is conviently using a poor memory to cover up.


      Their whole defense is built on a card-house of lies.  We just need one person to pull a card and the house of cards (lies) comes tumbling down.
      Beth & Dave may have to up the ante on the reward.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 06:35:57 PM
      Quote from: "Buckeye"

      Television there’s Peter R. de Vries who’s a detective who risks his life seeking out criminals and
      airs it on tv in his show. Uses secret camera’s, listening devices etc etc.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

      Let's hope he has some "secret" people tapping the perps/pimps...

      I'd like to know if this guy has ever phone tapped the police, or politicians. That is what has to be done here.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 06:37:07 PM
      Looking at the de Vries website, looks like his next show will be November 26th if I'm reading it correctly:

      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 06:43:06 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Looking at the de Vries website, looks like his next show will be November 26th if I'm reading it correctly:

      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/


      Klaas - have you had a chance to translate that article about de Vries?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 06:45:05 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Looking at the de Vries website, looks like his next show will be November 26th if I'm reading it correctly:

      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/


      Klaas - have you had a chance to translate that article about de Vries?


      No, I haven't.  I had an appointment this morning and have been busy trying to work today.  Hopefully tomorrow afternoon...sorry.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 06:52:44 PM
      MF at RU just brought up something interresting.  IF there was a phone call from Natalee saying "I don't know these people", where was it made from?

      MF wrote:

      I also read that they heard waves crashing in the background, no house near the Mariott area is that close to hear those waves that do not crash at that beach.

      Regarding Andre, I guess we should wait for PV's if they have this, to read about it. That they do not have it, does not mean that it does not exist, they only have I might guess, about 10% of the pages in the investigation....


      I wonder if the Gottenbos home is close enough to the beach to hear the waves crashing?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 06:52:50 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Wouldn't you think that since Paulus brought up his two visits to the bank the day after Natalee disappeared, that the Prosecutor would subpoena those records?  Just to verify his statements, you know.  Actually, wouldn't you think the Prosecutor might want to take a look at PVDS's records and the bank video from the entire month before and after the crime?  Our authorities would do that.  So, what's Aruba waiting for?


      You'd think so...I have always wondered if anybody honest dug into his bank records. What I find peculiar is that Paulus goes into so much detail of the minutia regarding these bank trips...it makes me suspicious of all aspects of it....maybe he didn't really go to two banks, but checking on something else....or maybe he was actually withdrawing money to hand off to someone ??? Whatever it is, his recitation is peculiar, IMO.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 06:56:38 PM
      More posted by Lazlo regarding the de Vries show and investigation:

      He listened, and the fact that we talked 3 times now (he knew my opinion when he contacted me) gives me hope they might be interested in looking at options other then Joran is guilty.

      But, it was obvious to me, that they had made up their minds about the angle from which they wanted to build up (Joran) I did my best to trigger him looking into other directions.

      Btw they will be investigating for at least 2 or 3 months more.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 07:04:21 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"

      Television there’s Peter R. de Vries who’s a detective who risks his life seeking out criminals and
      airs it on tv in his show. Uses secret camera’s, listening devices etc etc.
      http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

      Let's hope he has some "secret" people tapping the perps/pimps...

      I'd like to know if this guy has ever phone tapped the police, or politicians. That is what has to be done here.


      Well, if not, maybe he'll see it as a challenge...could be a really big ratings booster...Imagine the lead ins........


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 07:05:05 PM
      Shizaru - for your tme line as requested

      Sept 8, 2005 - Beth returns to Aruba (in the company of Joe M?) - CNN interview with Joe M on 9-8)

      Sept 11, 2005 - Beth leaves Aruba (Bondia article and Fox news interview with Geraldo Rivera on 9-11)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 07:06:04 PM
      Klaas, who in Aruba do you think released these suspect statements? Was it a standard lawyer to lawyer exchange or more likely something along the lines of a disgruntled authority(ALE, Pros, Media)?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 07:07:50 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      MF at RU just brought up something interresting.  IF there was a phone call from Natalee saying "I don't know these people", where was it made from?

      MF wrote:

      I also read that they heard waves crashing in the background, no house near the Mariott area is that close to hear those waves that do not crash at that beach.

      Regarding Andre, I guess we should wait for PV's if they have this, to read about it. That they do not have it, does not mean that it does not exist, they only have I might guess, about 10% of the pages in the investigation....


      I wonder if the Gottenbos home is close enough to the beach to hear the waves crashing?


      We have a PV from Andre...what's this about??

      Well, if the wave bit is accurate...you could certainly hear them on a boat...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 07:09:42 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "robots"
      jossy was here ?

       :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

      Jossy spends a great deal of time in the USA, he went to school here.  I believe he has doctors in the Miami area.


      From Dave's book, page 63:

      " On an airing of MSNBC's Abrams Report, Mansur was asked hwy he was involved in Natalee's case. He responded:

           I am involved for many reasons. Number one, I feel a strong affinity to this Alabama family that came here. I studied in Alabama. I went to college in Mobile, Alabama. I also went to high school in Mississippi, so I do feel a strong affinity to them. I know the people of those two states were very nice people to me when I was there at school, always invited on any holiday to one family or another's for Easter or Christmas or whatever, and I found them to be very fine and classy people...The reason is she is an American girl, a U.S. citizen that's disappeared from our island, and it's up to us, every single Aruban, to contribute and help and do whatever is necessary to find her...and we have our contacts also here locally that we've built over 25 years, so we have access to certain information no one else has.

      There is no disputing that Mansur's publicity has kept Natalee's face a visible focus on Aruba for a long time. He continues to be an advocate for our cause. "


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 07:11:23 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Klaas, who in Aruba do you think released these suspect statements? Was it a standard lawyer to lawyer exchange or more likely something along the lines of a disgruntled authority(ALE, Pros, Media)?

      I don't know how the statements were obtained.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 07:12:46 PM
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      MF at RU just brought up something interresting.  IF there was a phone call from Natalee saying "I don't know these people", where was it made from?

      MF wrote:

      I also read that they heard waves crashing in the background, no house near the Mariott area is that close to hear those waves that do not crash at that beach.

      Regarding Andre, I guess we should wait for PV's if they have this, to read about it. That they do not have it, does not mean that it does not exist, they only have I might guess, about 10% of the pages in the investigation....


      I wonder if the Gottenbos home is close enough to the beach to hear the waves crashing?


      We have a PV from Andre...what's this about??

      Well, if the wave bit is accurate...you could certainly hear them on a boat...

      Someone was speculating that the call might have been made from Andre Dos Santos home which is near the Marriott.  MF is saying that there are no homes near the Marriott close enough to hear the waves.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 07:14:13 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      This is from Joran's statement given on June 14.  He is explaining what he did on Monday, May 31--the night after Natalee disappeared, just before Beth and Jug and friends arrived on the island.

      My tennis lesson was between the hours of 18.00 pm and 19.00 pm. According to me I was not called by anyone during that time. I had also made no calls myself. Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse. After I had finised showering I got dressed. I do not remember what I put on that day. I was wearing a short trousers and a T-shirt. It looked pretty nice/proper. I also wore slippers. Then I called "Andre". I do not remember his phone number. Andre lives near the Marriot Hotel. We had agreed that we would meet at the Wyndham Hotel at approximately 20.00 pm to play poker. I had then also called Guido. Guido had told me that he had to go to work. He would come later and try to enter the tournament for half time. I had also called my father and asked if I could play poker at the Wyndham Casino. My father gave me permission.

      Does anyone recall in Paulus' statement where he expressed surprise that Joran was not home when Beth and Jug arrived at his house?  Paulus did not know where Joran was and called his cell phone.  Paulus really, really has a lousy memory, doesn't he?  He could not recall that his son called him after his tennis lesson to tell him where he would be that night. Amazing, just amazing.


      Good catch.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 07:15:31 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Klaas, who in Aruba do you think released these suspect statements? Was it a standard lawyer to lawyer exchange or more likely something along the lines of a disgruntled authority(ALE, Pros, Media)?


      Not Klaas, but I saved a post from MF, that was removed almost immediately, back in March.  Whytegirl did the translation.  So, I know there was some "leaking" of some kind then.

      Posted: Wed Mar 8th, 2006 12:53 am       Quote           Reply   

      Bernadina, someone is leaking.Net na e persona robez, esun cu ta kere cu e ta Dios."Just as this person stole, he believed that God was with him."Soko Soko, what are your kids doing?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 07:16:06 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      This is from Joran's statement given on June 14.  He is explaining what he did on Monday, May 31--the night after Natalee disappeared, just before Beth and Jug and friends arrived on the island.

      My tennis lesson was between the hours of 18.00 pm and 19.00 pm. According to me I was not called by anyone during that time. I had also made no calls myself. Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse. After I had finised showering I got dressed. I do not remember what I put on that day. I was wearing a short trousers and a T-shirt. It looked pretty nice/proper. I also wore slippers. Then I called "Andre". I do not remember his phone number. Andre lives near the Marriot Hotel. We had agreed that we would meet at the Wyndham Hotel at approximately 20.00 pm to play poker. I had then also called Guido. Guido had told me that he had to go to work. He would come later and try to enter the tournament for half time. I had also called my father and asked if I could play poker at the Wyndham Casino. My father gave me permission.

      Does anyone recall in Paulus' statement where he expressed surprise that Joran was not home when Beth and Jug arrived at his house?  Paulus did not know where Joran was and called his cell phone.  Paulus really, really has a lousy memory, doesn't he?  He could not recall that his son called him after his tennis lesson to tell him where he would be that night. Amazing, just amazing.

      May 31 is Tuesday, the day after Beth and Jug arrived.  Beth and Jug were at the Sloot home in the early morning hours of May 31, but they arrived in Aruba around 11pm May 30th.


      Another good catch.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 07:20:12 PM
      35 degrees tonight in Atlanta.  Brrrrrrrr.

      32 degrees where Gottenbos moved to.  I hope they brought warm clothes with them.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 07:40:28 PM
      I don't know why anyone would think that Paulus was " laundering " money 300.00 at a time.  If that.
      .
      There are most likely crooked card games that go on with the tourists, but just small 'tater stuff. Casinos have mechanisms in place for these things, but on Aruba, I can't see them doing anything according to any laws we know of.  
      .
      Koen lied, said he played tennis with Joran that day ( Monday ). They later found that it was a lie. A. Flanigan wanted Koen re intervieed for that reason.
      But the answer was no.  
      ...
      Somone hee posted that maybe Paulus wasn't in his office or that someone saw him at 10 -ish and that is why he used the bank as a story.
      .
      Don't you all find it amazing that he was called to the bar after he was released as a suspect ? must have some
      L
      O
      W

      .
      Standards there.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: sb on October 23, 2006, 07:44:26 PM
      Are the Refugees giving legitimacy now to the "I don't know these people" phone call with these comments? What do y'all think? It sounds like they are treating the call as a FACT and discussing it on technical grounds (sounds in background etc.)

      I have never been convinced that it was Mico the Monkey screching in the background, I feel that it was noise from a party or perhaps like they are saying, the sound of waves... or a boat.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 07:45:09 PM
      I don't think anyone saw PVDS at the bank at 10:00.  I think that was his excuse for being in Noord.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: sb on October 23, 2006, 07:46:45 PM
      BTW, we have absolutely NO proof that PVDS only made the ONE deposit.

      Maybe he did it, and then filled out a second deposit slip for The Big One.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 07:47:04 PM
      Quote from: "sb"
      Are the Refugees giving legitimacy now to the "I don't know these people" phone call with these comments? What do y'all think? It sounds like they are treating the call as a FACT and discussing it on technical grounds (sounds in background etc.)

      I have never been convinced that it was Mico the Monkey screching in the background, I feel that it was noise from a party or perhaps like they are saying, the sound of waves... or a boat.


      NO

      All I'm saying is that IF there was a call, and IF the sound of waves crashing was heard in the background, it would likely be in an area closer to Malmuk or Arashi Beach.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 07:49:52 PM
      If Paulus called Guido to verify that Joran had won the money in the Tourny at the HI, does that mean Guido was working that night?  The Excelsior closes at 5AM. I wonder what time Guido got off of work? And how did he get involved that he was charged with heavy battery and accessory to murder?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Windsor on October 23, 2006, 07:55:54 PM
      Hi everyone

      I have a quick question --

      when would Paulus have seen Joran for Joran to give his father the money?  Joran apparently didn't get up when his father told him to get up, and Paulus went off to work ...

      Is it stated that this was money that Joran had won Sunday at the Holiday Inn Excelsior, or could it have been before that.

      any ideas?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 07:56:35 PM
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      I don't think anyone saw PVDS at the bank at 10:00.  I think that was his excuse for being in Noord.

      IIRC, VDStraten worked in Noord.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 07:56:51 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      If Paulus called Guido to verify that Joran had won the money in the Tourny at the HI, does that mean Guido was working that night?  The Excelsior closes at 5AM. I wonder what time Guido got off of work? And how did he get involved that he was charged with heavy battery and accessory to murder?

      That is very good questuon and I am sure we will never have a straight answer.
      My understanding is on the Sunday, Guido left work early.
      Monday, he was with Joran most of the evening until 2 am, when Andre
      and Guido left. Can't remember who had the vehicle.
      The fellow employees of Guido said that he had scratches on his face and was wearing makeup.
      He left Aruba.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 07:59:45 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      I don't think anyone saw PVDS at the bank at 10:00.  I think that was his excuse for being in Noord.

      IIRC, VDStraten worked in Noord.

      That fits with what I was thinking. Go to work , then leave soon after to go to a bank that is on you way home ? The whole " bank" load makes no sense. Excuse the typos.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 08:03:00 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      I don't think anyone saw PVDS at the bank at 10:00.  I think that was his excuse for being in Noord.

      IIRC, VDStraten worked in Noord.


      And the beach patrol was notified about 9am that Natalee was missing....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 08:05:05 PM
      Quote from: "Windsor"
      Hi everyone

      I have a quick question --

      when would Paulus have seen Joran for Joran to give his father the money?  Joran apparently didn't get up when his father told him to get up, and Paulus went off to work ...

      Is it stated that this was money that Joran had won Sunday at the Holiday Inn Excelsior, or could it have been before that.

      any ideas?


      If we want to believe that Joran would give his father money...the other lie was that he picked him up at McDonalds Sunday at 11 pm...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 23, 2006, 08:08:34 PM
      Got this from our IS at work today:

      If you receive an email supposedly from Microsoft that contains a link to download Internet Explorer 7, DO NOT DO IT. There is a spoofed email going around that directs you to a fake site that loads spy ware on your computer. Thanks.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 08:11:01 PM
      The beach patrol just drove down the beach.
      I don't think that it was taken seriously by anyone except the MB ppl that she wasn't there. That might be the case regardless where this took place. When she didn't return in time to catch the plane, they should have really sounded the alarm. The Renfrog Wart mentioned something in the VF article that Jan van Der Stratten wanted to wait 48 hours.
      I woulds like to have De Vries dig up the connection between those two, PVDS and Jan VDS.
      ..
      Dutch Team... wonder if they had the authority to put a few Q's to Jan ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 08:12:18 PM
      Quote from: "justinsmama"
      Got this from our IS at work today:

      If you receive an email supposedly from Microsoft that contains a link to download Internet Explorer 7, DO NOT DO IT. There is a spoofed email going around that directs you to a fake site that loads spy ware on your computer. Thanks.


      Thanks for the heads up.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 08:12:47 PM
      Ty Justins.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 08:13:56 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      The beach patrol just drove down the beach.
      I don't think that it was taken seriously by anyone except the MB ppl that she wasn't there. That might be the case regardless where this took place. When she didn't return in time to catch the plane, they should have really sounded the alarm. The Renfrog Wart mentioned something in the VF article that Jan van Der Stratten wanted to wait 48 hours.
      I woulds like to have De Vries dig up the connection between those two, PVDS and Jan VDS.
      ..
      Dutch Team... wonder if they had the authority to put a few Q's to Jan ?


      I understand this.  But, maybe JVDS did get a call from them and wanted to talk to PVDS that (banking) morning in Noord.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 08:22:59 PM
      I used to think that Paulus got involved AFTER the HT's showed up at this doorstep.
      Now, becasue of the computer records showing someone on the computer ( not Joran ) at 7 - ish before they even got there, all this CRAPOLA from Paulus about the bank, arranging lawyers, making phone calls, questioning Joran's friends, getting the HT's away from his house, well I now think that he knew late that Sunday night, early Monday morning.
      And I am pretty sure just from the statements and how hard the Sloots tried to pin Natalee's disappearance on Natalee that right after " Something bad happened " that Paulus got involved.  
      Paulus is a Bast*rd. Sorry for swearing. Well, not that sorry or I would backspace it out.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 08:24:30 PM
      Quote from: "justinsmama"
      Got this from our IS at work today:

      If you receive an email supposedly from Microsoft that contains a link to download Internet Explorer 7, DO NOT DO IT. There is a spoofed email going around that directs you to a fake site that loads spy ware on your computer. Thanks.


      Ah, how is that any different from a normal Microsoft download? ;)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 08:25:55 PM
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      The beach patrol just drove down the beach.
      I don't think that it was taken seriously by anyone except the MB ppl that she wasn't there. That might be the case regardless where this took place. When she didn't return in time to catch the plane, they should have really sounded the alarm. The Renfrog Wart mentioned something in the VF article that Jan van Der Stratten wanted to wait 48 hours.
      I woulds like to have De Vries dig up the connection between those two, PVDS and Jan VDS.
      ..
      Dutch Team... wonder if they had the authority to put a few Q's to Jan ?


      I understand this.  But, maybe JVDS did get a call from them and wanted to talk to PVDS that (banking) morning in Noord.


      Most likely the other way around, PVDS was initiating the calls, he new what happened that night/morning and had to get the ball rolling.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 08:27:33 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I used to think that Paulus got involved AFTER the HT's showed up at this doorstep.
      Now, becasue of the computer records showing someone on the computer ( not Joran ) at 7 - ish before they even got there, all this CRAPOLA from Paulus about the bank, arranging lawyers, making phone calls, questioning Joran's friends, getting the HT's away from his house, well I now think that he knew late that Sunday night, early Monday morning.
      And I am pretty sure just from the statements and how hard the Sloots tried to pin Natalee's disappearance on Natalee that right after " Something bad happened " that Paulus got involved.  
      Paulus is a Bast*rd. Sorry for swearing. Well, not that sorry or I would backspace it out.

      Yep, I agree with all of the above.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 08:33:28 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      The beach patrol just drove down the beach.
      I don't think that it was taken seriously by anyone except the MB ppl that she wasn't there. That might be the case regardless where this took place. When she didn't return in time to catch the plane, they should have really sounded the alarm. The Renfrog Wart mentioned something in the VF article that Jan van Der Stratten wanted to wait 48 hours.
      I woulds like to have De Vries dig up the connection between those two, PVDS and Jan VDS.
      ..
      Dutch Team... wonder if they had the authority to put a few Q's to Jan ?


      I understand this.  But, maybe JVDS did get a call from them and wanted to talk to PVDS that (banking) morning in Noord.


      Most likely the other way around, PVDS was initiating the calls, he new what happened that night/morning and had to get the ball rolling.


      Yep...or just drove by instead of calling...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 08:33:59 PM
      Evening monkeys. Hope everyone is well.

      ....the sounds in the background on the phone call we aren't certain even happened...in the wee hours of the morning...when it was quiet and sounds carry better than during the day...thinking, thinking... :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 08:38:35 PM
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 08:43:11 PM
      To Refugees

      If you read the Joe Taco papers, Watson turned her pictures over to the FBI.  Please get off the Marcia conspiracy and MB coverup.  If you put half the effort into research as you do into trashing, you might get somewhere.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 08:48:29 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Yes, that was suspicious precisely for the reason you mention, but she claims it was a scheduled family affair/reunion thing that apparently PVDS didn't need to attend.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 08:49:05 PM
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 23, 2006, 08:51:00 PM
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeah, isn't that one just a real treat?  :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 23, 2006, 08:53:11 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      MF at RU just brought up something interresting.  IF there was a phone call from Natalee saying "I don't know these people", where was it made from?

      MF wrote:

      I also read that they heard waves crashing in the background, no house near the Mariott area is that close to hear those waves that do not crash at that beach.

      Regarding Andre, I guess we should wait for PV's if they have this, to read about it. That they do not have it, does not mean that it does not exist, they only have I might guess, about 10% of the pages in the investigation....


      I wonder if the Gottenbos home is close enough to the beach to hear the waves crashing?


      We have a PV from Andre...what's this about??

      Well, if the wave bit is accurate...you could certainly hear them on a boat...

      Someone was speculating that the call might have been made from Andre Dos Santos home which is near the Marriott.  MF is saying that there are no homes near the Marriott close enough to hear the waves.


      I am not finsihed reading and I probably should but Melody lives near the Marriott.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 23, 2006, 08:54:16 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Yes, that was suspicious precisely for the reason you mention, but she claims it was a scheduled family affair/reunion thing that apparently PVDS didn't need to attend.


      To answer Kat_Gram, I guess the ones with the see-through blouses and as to your question, Carnut, perhaps no one in her family liked Paulus or her kids. :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 09:01:40 PM
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 09:05:49 PM
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.

      I think the main players are paid, Glenda, MF, Scubajap and a few others.  The rest are lost soles that need to feel special and part of a group.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 23, 2006, 09:12:38 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.

      I think the main players are paid, Glenda, MF, Scubajap and a few others.  The rest are lost soles that need to feel special and part of a group.


      You're probably right...but they wouldn't be so lost if they picked their groups better.  There are so many needs in the world.  They should attempt some good with their time.  They would feel better in the long wrong.  If it's a job with money, then you do what you need to do.  Better choice might be to find a different job.  I wouldn't be able to sleep.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Leslie on October 23, 2006, 09:18:38 PM
      Actually, it is comforting to think that most of the RU are in it for the money.  It proves that they are just money whores and not raving lunatics.  Wang Chung must be just raking in the guilders/florins/dollars.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 09:20:33 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.

      I think the main players are paid, Glenda, MF, Scubajap and a few others.  The rest are lost soles that need to feel special and part of a group.


      Paid or needy -- they're all schmucks. Detestable to the core.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 09:24:26 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "sb"
      Are the Refugees giving legitimacy now to the "I don't know these people" phone call with these comments? What do y'all think? It sounds like they are treating the call as a FACT and discussing it on technical grounds (sounds in background etc.)

      I have never been convinced that it was Mico the Monkey screching in the background, I feel that it was noise from a party or perhaps like they are saying, the sound of waves... or a boat.


      NO

      All I'm saying is that IF there was a call, and IF the sound of waves crashing was heard in the background, it would likely be in an area closer to Malmuk or Arashi Beach.


      We know the tide was out, but coming back to a high tide that occurred at around 6:00 AM.

      Arashi is described as shallow peaceful waters. Malmuk is also shallow waters and so is Hadicurari (FH).  The would have more lapping water than crashing waves.  Beaches that have the crashing waves are on the northern side of the island.  

      If they were still up by the lighthouse could the sounds of the beach from Andicuri be heard?  Or could they have been near where the fabric and shallow grave were found near Dos Playa?

      Andicuri- extreme NE tip up by the lighthouse has waves for surfing and body surfing.

      Dos Playa – Surrounded by a rocky coastline, Dos Playa is a white beach with great waves. Advanced surfers go for an extreme surfing experience here, as the strong winds can be overwhelming for novice enthusiast.  
      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/DosPlaya.jpg)

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/GoogleMapBeaches.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 09:25:20 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Yes, that was suspicious precisely for the reason you mention, but she claims it was a scheduled family affair/reunion thing that apparently PVDS didn't need to attend.

      A scheduled family re union. Usually, when we do these " family ' things, the family goes ! !


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 09:37:10 PM
      Another reason to think Paulus did not go to the so-called family reunion in Holland re:

      From Paulus' statement :

      1) " To your question whether Sebastian and Valentijn went to school
      that Monday, I can state the following. Yes, they got onto the bus
      and went to school because in the period that Anita was away they
      took the bus every day. "

      2) " To your question whether I wait to see if they get on the bus,
      I can state following. Yes, I stay and watch. "

      1) Alright...he is saying " in the period that Anita is away"..he doesn't say in the period that WE were away...

      2)  Here is states that he watches them get on the bus....SO he has been there during the entire period that Anita was away, and he has been there to see them on the bus for THE ENTIRE PERIOD.

      He wasn't in Holland at all, IMO.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 09:37:44 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Yes, that was suspicious precisely for the reason you mention, but she claims it was a scheduled family affair/reunion thing that apparently PVDS didn't need to attend.

      A scheduled family re union. Usually, when we do these " family ' things, the family goes ! !

      The Sloots aren't normal family.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: oldfart on October 23, 2006, 09:37:45 PM
      Hi gang..
      Just peeking in ... for a bit..
      Need to pack for a dull 3 day trip  :(

      After reading the FP and Aruba's loans (?) from Holland
      Quote
      Aruba now wants to borrow 50 million dollars from the Deutsche Bank, but this bank doesn’t want to complete the transaction as long as the Federal Government does not approve the loan.

      ( I assume that that this is Hollands Federal Govt. and not our  :roll:   :lol: )

      I seem  :roll:  to remember something a about a provision in their
      "Semi - Independent Status" being Dependent on Payments to Holland???
      Some one help me out here please...

      Could  Holland  "Revoke"  Aruba's semi independent status ??[/quote]


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 09:40:43 PM
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Another reason to think Paulus did not go to the so-called family reunion in Holland re:

      From Paulus' statement :

      1) " To your question whether Sebastian and Valentijn went to school
      that Monday, I can state the following. Yes, they got onto the bus
      and went to school because in the period that Anita was away they
      took the bus every day. "

      2) " To your question whether I wait to see if they get on the bus,
      I can state following. Yes, I stay and watch. "

      1) Alright...he is saying " in the period that Anita is away"..he doesn't say in the period that WE were away...

      2)  Here is states that he watches them get on the bus....SO he has been there during the entire period that Anita was away, and he has been there to see them on the bus for THE ENTIRE PERIOD.

      He wasn't in Holland at all, IMO.


      Plus according to Andre's statement, Paulus was already gambling with his date by 4:30 on 5/29.

      From Andre dos Santos, June 20, 2005 statement:

      On Sunday, May 29, 2005, around 16:30, I met Joran in the Excelsior casino of the Holiday Inn hotel. The moment I met Joran I was in the company of my father called "Montival SANTOS". Joran was in the company of father named “Paul” that is when my father and I met them in the “Excelsior Casino”. On that day we played in a "Texas Hold'm poker Tournament". Joran was first to be eliminated from the tournament. I no longer remember at what time Joran lost. I saw that Joran then played "black-Jack" and I continued play poker


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 09:42:45 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      A teacher like Anita!  :lol:   :lol:
      She's an art teacher or whatever it is she describes herself as.

      And if it was a family reunion, what type of family reunion starts in the middle of the week and ends in the middle of the following week?  Why didn't she just go for the weekend?  If her kids were having finals in school, what kind of mother would leave her children for a whole week during all of that?  Most would stay home to make sure the kids ate right, got their sleep and studied.  But I guess when you Mom is the school teacher and your Daddy is the judge you don't have to do any of those things to pass to the next grade.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 09:43:39 PM
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      To Refugees

      If you read the Joe Taco papers, Watson turned her pictures over to the FBI.  Please get off the Marcia conspiracy and MB coverup.  If you put half the effort into research as you do into trashing, you might get somewhere.


      that is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  PLAYED


       :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 09:46:23 PM
      paulus went to the BANK for real the second time in the day to get money from his SAFE DEPOSIT BOX

      untraceable

      he had to pay people off


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 09:50:59 PM
      I bet Paulus ( and Joran ) had been out gambling every night Anita was away. Staying home with a good book and a cup of cocoa while the little woman was away probably wasn't on his agenda.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 09:51:19 PM
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 09:54:11 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.

      I think the main players are paid, Glenda, MF, Scubajap and a few others.  The rest are lost soles that need to feel special and part of a group.


      you just NAILED it


      i think the word is SHILL  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 23, 2006, 09:55:58 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Or the sound of rushing wind in a traveling vehicle?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 09:58:28 PM
      Maybe we should make up a list of questions that need to be answered derived from all the inconsistencies we know of.  Maybe de Vries will read here and read that thread.  Beth did mention Scared Monkeys in her last interview in Holland.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 10:02:07 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Maybe we should make up a list of questions that need to be answered derived from all the inconsistencies we know of.  Maybe de Vries will read here and read that thread.  Beth did mention Scared Monkeys in her last interview in Holland.


      Heh, heh, you'd think anyone with half a brain could figure this case out, if he's any kind of investigator at all, he shouldn't need any help.

      But it sure shouldn't heart to let him know whats available.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 10:02:34 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:03:22 PM
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )


      DECOY  DECOY DECOY  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 10:04:21 PM
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )


      Yeah, kinda like some of us were led down the garden path on the PVDS in Holland trip.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:04:57 PM
      Quote from: "justinsmama"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Or the sound of rushing wind in a traveling vehicle?


      i was just gonna post the same thing  :shock:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 10:13:47 PM
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 10:15:11 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...

      Probably Renfrog  :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:16:33 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      :::rasing my hand:: I know... I know... she read it in a bodice ripper novel and decided that it would add that extra special something to her story...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 10:18:14 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Probably Renfrog  :wink:

       :lol:  You read my mind Klaas. I just didn't want to mention her/it again.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 10:21:03 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      :::rasing my hand:: I know... I know... she read it in a bodice ripper novel and decided that it would add that extra special something to her story...


       :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 10:23:47 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Okay, I will say no more about the sounds... I get the message.  :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 10:26:13 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Okay, I will say no more about the sounds... I get the message.  :roll:

      Lala's - I think the problem is this:

      #1 - we don't know for sure if there really was a call

      #2 - if MF and Scubajap are saying sounds of waves, then we can probably rule out "sounds of waves".


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:27:40 PM
      Exactly Klaasend... as San would say if they say there were sounds of waves.... it means there wasn't.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:28:26 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Okay, I will say no more about the sounds... I get the message.  :roll:

      Lala's - I think the problem is this:

      #1 - we don't know for sure if there really was a call

      #2 - if MF and Scubajap are saying sounds of waves, then we can probably rule out "sounds of waves".


      the only waves i hear are waves of LAUGHTER from myself thinking what HAIR BRAINED SCHEMES some will come with

      makes me want to HURL  :twisted:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 23, 2006, 10:29:04 PM
      The Sound of Waves ?!?

      Those aren't "waves" you're hearing, kids.

      That's the sound of a coverup beginning it's inevitable, groaning crash to the ground.

      I thought there was "no" call.  Gerben said that even if there was a call it was "inconclusive" in terms of id-ing the female voice.  So I guess now there "was" a call.  Because after all we all know there was a call because it has been attested to and beth and greta both discussed this call --on air -- and beth stated she "believed" it was from Natalee.  We have the words of Spencer Bachus, who upon hearing the words of the call and being told of their meaning, said "...this was NOT a teen who simply wandered off..."

      The call, if verified (via BHT affadavit) as being Natalee is slam-dunk, see you in 20 years, evidence of KIDNAPPING.  Exactly the charge FAT BOY VAN DER STRAATEN said didn't happen.  Oh, you mean she was abducted, assualted and murdered because she WANTED THAT?

      WAVES ?!?

      I don't hear waves.  I hear a young girl crying for help.

      Kidnapping, anyone?

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:31:32 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      The Sound of Waves ?!?

      Those aren't "waves" you're hearing, kids.

      That's the sound of a coverup beginning it's inevitable, groaning crash to the ground.

      I thought there was "no" call.  Gerben said that even if there was a call it was "inconclusive" in terms of id-ing the female voice.  So I guess now there "was" a call.  Because after all we all know there was a call because it has been attested to and beth and greta both discussed this call --on air -- and beth stated she "believed" it was from Natalee.  We have the words of Spencer Bachus, who upon hearing the words of the call and being told of their meaning, said "...this was NOT a teen who simply wandered off..."

      The call, if verified (via BHT affadavit) as being Natalee is slam-dunk, see you in 20 years, evidence of KIDNAPPING.  Exactly the charge FAT BOY VAN DER STRAATEN said didn't happen.  Oh, you mean she was abducted, assualted and murdered because she WANTED THAT?

      WAVES ?!?

      I don't hear waves.  I hear a young girl crying for help.

      Kidnapping, anyone?

      .



      the HAMMER STRIKES AGAIN  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Ono on October 23, 2006, 10:35:21 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      The Sound of Waves ?!?

      Those aren't "waves" you're hearing, kids.

      That's the sound of a coverup beginning it's inevitable, groaning crash to the ground.

      I thought there was "no" call.  Gerben said that even if there was a call it was "inconclusive" in terms of id-ing the female voice.  So I guess now there "was" a call.  Because after all we all know there was a call because it has been attested to and beth and greta both discussed this call --on air -- and beth stated she "believed" it was from Natalee.  We have the words of Spencer Bachus, who upon hearing the words of the call and being told of their meaning, said "...this was NOT a teen who simply wandered off..."

      The call, if verified (via BHT affadavit) as being Natalee is slam-dunk, see you in 20 years, evidence of KIDNAPPING.  Exactly the charge FAT BOY VAN DER STRAATEN said didn't happen.  Oh, you mean she was abducted, assualted and murdered because she WANTED THAT?

      WAVES ?!?

      I don't hear waves.  I hear a young girl crying for help.

      Kidnapping, anyone?

      .



      the HAMMER STRIKES AGAIN  8)


      One of the best ones yet !!!!!!!!!!!!  Semper Fi ~


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:36:12 PM
      so maybe PAULUS goes to work, leaves at 10 to go to the BANK  :roll:

      but he really goes to talk with someone on the phone, you really cant be talking about a murder cover up in your office, well in TOILET
      you can

      For your information i do not refer to ARUBA as ARUBA anymore, i only refer to it as TOILET, not the TOILET only TOILET


      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone  :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 23, 2006, 10:39:13 PM
      Ok monkeys I hate to just drive by but it's been a busy night at the red's ... lots of chores...

      I do want to say good night and keep the faith!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:40:17 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Ok monkeys I hate to just drive by but it's been a busy night at the red's ... lots of chores...

      I do want to say good night and keep the faith!!


      gnite mate 8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Mere on October 23, 2006, 10:41:41 PM
      robots.....you made me log in..... :D  :D  :D

      ......I'm so glad I was here....later on I might not understand what you were talking about....funny...

      Good night mrs.....

      Hello friends....Mere


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 10:43:00 PM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      robots.....you made me log in..... :D  :D  :D

      ......I'm so glad I was here....later on I might not understand what you were talking about....funny...

      Good night mrs.....

      Hello friends....Mere

      Hi Mere :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 10:43:23 PM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      robots.....you made me log in..... :D  :D  :D

      ......I'm so glad I was here....later on I might not understand what you were talking about....funny...

      Good night mrs.....

      Hello friends....Mere

       :lol: Sometimes Robots is easier to understand like this!  :lol:

      (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/robots_21806.gif)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Mere on October 23, 2006, 10:46:03 PM
      Hi San and Klaasend.....

      I try to keep up by reading a few times a day....mostly do not have anything to add....lots of thinking monkeys on this site.....watching from the trees...!  :)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:52:26 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      robots.....you made me log in..... :D  :D  :D

      ......I'm so glad I was here....later on I might not understand what you were talking about....funny...

      Good night mrs.....

      Hello friends....Mere

       :lol: Sometimes Robots is easier to understand like this!  :lol:

      (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/robots_21806.gif)




       :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 10:53:13 PM
      So I guess we are back to the "there was NO call" theory again? Which is it? Call or no call?  I think a call happened...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:53:14 PM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      robots.....you made me log in..... :D  :D  :D

      ......I'm so glad I was here....later on I might not understand what you were talking about....funny...

      Good night mrs.....

      Hello friends....Mere



      im glad you are here to see a ROBOT TRANSLATION  8)  :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 10:57:06 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone

      MOJ Rudy Croes has openly accussed VDStraten of having inappropriate phone contacts during the first week of the investigation. Paulus now says he talked to VDStraten almost every day. If they talked on monday that would look bad, very bad for ALE.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 10:58:41 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "robots"
      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone

      MOJ Rudy Croes has openly accussed VDStraten of having inappropriate phone contacts during the first week of the investigation. Paulus now says he talked to VDStraten almost every day. If they talked on monday that would look bad, very bad for ALE.


      yep


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 23, 2006, 10:59:55 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "robots"
      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone

      MOJ Rudy Croes has openly accussed VDStraten of having inappropriate phone contacts during the first week of the investigation. Paulus now says he talked to VDStraten almost every day. If they talked on monday that would look bad, very bad for ALE.

      VDStraten should be in jail.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 11:02:51 PM
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:05:29 PM
      Agreed Big Hammer, at some point she was abducted.   My belief is that she likely knew she was not in good hands shortly after leaving the bar.   Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving.  He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student.  To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed.  

      Secondly, the porn video?  This is a glimpse into the mind of predators in my opinion.  Only predators would display pornographic materials to a complete stranger that they had met only hours before and in K2's case, only a half hour before, yet they had the notion to play a porn video for their overseas GUEST?  I think not!  A more likely scenario is that they KNEW Natalee would not be in a position to pass judgement on them or they simply did not care.  This clearly is a contradiction to Deepak's previous 'go with your friends' gesture.  At what point in the ride did the Natalee's freedom become compromised?  BEFORE DEEPAK URINATED?  Perhaps shortly after showing the porno, and likely around the same time Natalee became concerned about her security and well being?  

      On more than one occasion Deepak stated he stopped at the end of the asphalt at Arashi Beach and urinated.  Pretty detailed description of a piss break, huh?  Charles Croes went to ARASHI to locate one of Joran's associates.  WHY ARASHI?  Did Joran frequent Arashi Beach?  Was there a Soul Beach Music Festival after hours party there?  If Natalee was aware of the imminent danger before they arrived at Arashi Beach then wouldn't this be the likely location of her attempted escape if that occurred?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 11:07:09 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      So I guess we are back to the "there was NO call" theory again? Which is it? Call or no call?  I think a call happened...

      I don't think we know anything for sure.  I am inclined to believe that there was a call recieved on Williams cellphone, a message left, that some people think was Natalee.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:07:29 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:08:43 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 11:08:59 PM
      New postcard for Aruba:


      (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaBeachToilet.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:09:46 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      And Sander's phone is missing.  Not to mention the Gottenbos' were out on their boat that day.  Arashi is just north of Malmok Weg.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 11:10:58 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      And Sander's phone is missing.  Not to mention the Gottenbos' were out on their boat that day.  Arashi is just north of Malmok Weg.

      Sander's phone really bothers me.  How convenient it was lost on May 30th, huh?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:11:56 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "robots"
      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone

      MOJ Rudy Croes has openly accussed VDStraten of having inappropriate phone contacts during the first week of the investigation. Paulus now says he talked to VDStraten almost every day. If they talked on monday that would look bad, very bad for ALE.

      VDStraten should be in jail.


      Shango Says:June 26th, 2005 at 10:13 pm
      DirtyHand walks in ALL houses
      houses of the Arawaks, and houses of Rave
      He can break the alibi

      My apologies to the Shango doubters...I just could not resist.  :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 11:12:19 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      And Sander's phone is missing.  Not to mention the Gottenbos' were out on their boat that day.  Arashi is just north of Malmok Weg.

      Sander's phone really bothers me.  How convenient it was lost on May 30th, huh?


      because the phone is lost is interesting

      probably they could still get the records of all calls ?  


      YES _____


      NO_______


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:12:21 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      And Sander's phone is missing.  Not to mention the Gottenbos' were out on their boat that day.  Arashi is just north of Malmok Weg.

      Sander's phone really bothers me.  How convenient it was lost on May 30th, huh?


      How convenient they had access to a boat that night and have stated they were out that damn day on the GD boat.   :evil:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: igsigs on October 23, 2006, 11:12:21 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      VDStraten should be in jail.

      That's a risk you take when you are *friends* with the Sloots. Paulus is not shy in mentioning VDStraten. Says Jan visited him at his office, says Jan allowed him to sit in on statements, says he talked to him almost every day, says he is good friends with him(Nova 6/29). Sounds almost threatening the way he involves him.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:13:15 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      What call? The one that didn't happen?  :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: yapperz1 on October 23, 2006, 11:18:09 PM
      Hiya monkeys

      I believe Natalee did get off a call. Could it have been from Sander's phone????


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 11:18:21 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      What call? The one that didn't happen?  :roll:

      Yep.... that one.
      Where there were voices ( plural ) in the background.
      I don't remember the sinister however.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:20:44 PM
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "San"
      VDStraten should be in jail.

      That's a risk you take when you are *friends* with the Sloots. Paulus is not shy in mentioning VDStraten. Says Jan visited him at his office, says Jan allowed him to sit in on statements, says he talked to him almost every day, says he is good friends with him(Nova 6/29). Sounds almost threatening the way he involves him.
      [/b]

      Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 9:51 pm
      DirtyHand walks with the Babylons, the Arawaks and is consort to the fallen elder
      The gods are talking


      Sometimes this is just too easy. :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 23, 2006, 11:21:05 PM
      When they came to arrest Paulus, he didn't want to go with them, so, they let him drive himself ! ! He was " under arrest", but was allowed to
      take himself to the police station. Source.... Dave's book.
      Hmmmm....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:21:13 PM
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Yes, that was suspicious precisely for the reason you mention, but she claims it was a scheduled family affair/reunion thing that apparently PVDS didn't need to attend.


      To answer Kat_Gram, I guess the ones with the see-through blouses and as to your question, Carnut, perhaps no one in her family liked Paulus or her kids. :wink:


      Am trying to catch up reading but would like to call attention to the most peculiar timing of this event.  Why not delay it until school was out especially for Anita and any children attending.  Maybe it was a meeting of her coven  and so they didn't need to attend?  Maybe she left Paulus' sorry, spineless self and was making arrangements to move herself and the kids to Holland and leave him and his devil spawn Joran when this happened.

      This is a most peculiar family.  We never planned anything like a trip until school was out and most families work around the school schedule.  So it was for something that did not realy include HER family in Aruba.  Just her.  A convention of the See Through Blouse Association?   :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 11:22:16 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      When they came to arrest Paulus, he didn't want to go with them, so, they let him drive himself ! ! He was " under arrest", but was allowed to
      take himself to the police station. Source.... Dave's book.
      Hmmmm....


      more PRIVATE time to make calls  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 11:23:23 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Why was Anita in Holland ? What teacher takes time off just before school is about to end ?


      Yes, that was suspicious precisely for the reason you mention, but she claims it was a scheduled family affair/reunion thing that apparently PVDS didn't need to attend.


      To answer Kat_Gram, I guess the ones with the see-through blouses and as to your question, Carnut, perhaps no one in her family liked Paulus or her kids. :wink:


      Am trying to catch up reading but would like to call attention to the most peculiar timing of this event.  Why not delay it until school was out especially for Anita and any children attending.  Maybe it was a meeting of her coven  and so they didn't need to attend?  Maybe she left Paulus' sorry, spineless self and was making arrangements to move herself and the kids to Holland and leave him and his devil spawn Joran when this happened.

      This is a most peculiar family.  We never planned anything like a trip until school was out and most families work around the school schedule.  So it was for something that did not realy include HER family in Aruba.  Just her.  A convention of the See Through Blouse Association?   :D



      heheheheheheheeee :D  :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:25:12 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      And Sander's phone is missing.  Not to mention the Gottenbos' were out on their boat that day.  Arashi is just north of Malmok Weg.

      Sander's phone really bothers me.  How convenient it was lost on May 30th, huh?


      How convenient they had access to a boat that night and have stated they were out that damn day on the GD boat.   :evil:



      The last I heard was Dave Holloway begging them to question Koen and search the boat.  I wonder if they ever did search the boat?  Anyone know?

      And I agree with Lalas that van der Straaten making contact like that and refusing to retire as scheduled and all the rest, there are more than the suspects who should be in jail and this is what I am hoping Peter de Vries features in his show/investigation.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:26:25 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      When they came to arrest Paulus, he didn't want to go with them, so, they let him drive himself ! ! He was " under arrest", but was allowed to
      take himself to the police station. Source.... Dave's book.
      Hmmmm....


      Now, tell me where this kind of power originates?  How can one person have this much power that they are granted the ability to just drive himself to the jail, while under arrest?  Who made that happen??  HUH?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 11:28:52 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      When they came to arrest Paulus, he didn't want to go with them, so, they let him drive himself ! ! He was " under arrest", but was allowed to
      take himself to the police station. Source.... Dave's book.
      Hmmmm....


      Now, tell me where this kind of power originates?  How can one person have this much power that they are granted the ability to just drive himself to the jail, while under arrest?  Who made that happen??  HUH?


      cause PAULUS knows and made it known,

      "if i go down i will bring several others with me"


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:30:02 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      What call? The one that didn't happen?  :roll:

      Yep.... that one.
      Where there were voices ( plural ) in the background.
      I don't remember the sinister however.


      http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/63312

      Source for Sinister voice reference, although not the most credible one.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: yapperz1 on October 23, 2006, 11:31:25 PM
      I would believe The Ntional Enquirer b4 any of the TH's on the Rock.  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: yapperz1 on October 23, 2006, 11:32:08 PM
      Nite Monkeys. My fingers are refusing to co-operate.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 23, 2006, 11:32:57 PM
      Nite Yapperz


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:33:35 PM
      Nite yapperz, sleep well.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:34:00 PM
      Quote from: "yapperz1"
      I would believe The Ntional Enquirer b4 any of the TH's on the Rock.  :lol:


      Would you believe Beth is she referenced the call?  She has...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:36:11 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      so maybe PAULUS goes to work, leaves at 10 to go to the BANK  :roll:

      but he really goes to talk with someone on the phone, you really cant be talking about a murder cover up in your office, well in TOILET
      you can

      For your information i do not refer to ARUBA as ARUBA anymore, i only refer to it as TOILET, not the TOILET only TOILET


      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone  :wink:



      I agree with this Robots.  He left the office to take care of this "problem" that resulted from "something bad happening" and if we are going to be accused of acting on emotion rather than any facts I have always felt and emoted that it was VDStraaten on the phone calling when Paulus took the call during an international interview.  I think Paulus had them looking for Natalee's remains or disposing of them and that is what the call was about.  What else on the face of this earth could be that important?  And cause that much sweating.

      And if we are going to be accused of being emotional rather than factual, I have had an image, a very strong one, of Natalee being in a professional body bag, the black zipping kind no matter what happened to her.  That has just always stuck in my mind that they had that professional touch to all of this.  I have also thought at some time she may have even been in the official morgue and that is where van der Straaten saw the evidence and we did not as he said to the reporter.  At some point he saw something that confirmed to him that Natalee was no longer living.  Yet somebody tore up a statement of Joran's made around that time.  Dave saw it on Jacobs desk.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:37:29 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "yapperz1"
      I would believe The Ntional Enquirer b4 any of the TH's on the Rock.  :lol:


      Would you believe Beth is she referenced the call?  She has...



      The call happened.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 11:38:22 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Agreed Big Hammer, at some point she was abducted.   My belief is that she likely knew she was not in good hands shortly after leaving the bar.   Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving.  He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student.  To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed.  

      Secondly, the porn video?  This is a glimpse into the mind of predators in my opinion.  Only predators would display pornographic materials to a complete stranger that they had met only hours before and in K2's case, only a half hour before, yet they had the notion to play a porn video for their overseas GUEST?  I think not!  A more likely scenario is that they KNEW Natalee would not be in a position to pass judgement on them or they simply did not care.  This clearly is a contradiction to Deepak's previous 'go with your friends' gesture.  At what point in the ride did the Natalee's freedom become compromised?  BEFORE DEEPAK URINATED?  Perhaps shortly after showing the porno, and likely around the same time Natalee became concerned about her security and well being?  

      On more than one occasion Deepak stated he stopped at the end of the asphalt at Arashi Beach and urinated.  Pretty detailed description of a piss break, huh?  Charles Croes went to ARASHI to locate one of Joran's associates.  WHY ARASHI?  Did Joran frequent Arashi Beach?  Was there a Soul Beach Music Festival after hours party there?  If Natalee was aware of the imminent danger before they arrived at Arashi Beach then wouldn't this be the likely location of her attempted escape if that occurred?


      Joran probably attacked Natalee in the car as soon as the porn video started. Their gang sign is the "shocker" and he probably forced her to have his way.  I really don't think that Deepak stopped at the blacktop when the lighthouse was less that a mile away.  I still think Natalee tried to run at the lighthouse, but her legs were wobbly and she only got as far as the rocks before she tripped or someone tackled her.  She was terribly cut and bleeding.  They packed her back in the car, drove to the pond to wash up a bit and decide what to do with her.  Either they dropped her at the huts with joran, or they dropped them at Joran's apt.   I think she was alive for hours after the head injury.  She was able to walk with assistance and talk.  I think she was bleeding slowly in her head and between the booze, the drugs slipped her and the increasing pressure in her brain, she slipped in unconciousness and then she stopped breathing.  Joran woke up with a dead girl in his bed.  Skipped school the next day along with Satish & Deepak. But she was eventually moved & finally disposed of from where they left her.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 11:38:34 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "robots"
      so maybe PAULUS goes to work, leaves at 10 to go to the BANK  :roll:

      but he really goes to talk with someone on the phone, you really cant be talking about a murder cover up in your office, well in TOILET
      you can

      For your information i do not refer to ARUBA as ARUBA anymore, i only refer to it as TOILET, not the TOILET only TOILET


      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone  :wink:



      I agree with this Robots.  He left the office to take care of this "problem" that resulted from "something bad happening" and if we are going to be accused of acting on emotion rather than any facts I have always felt and emoted that it was VDStraaten on the phone calling when Paulus took the call during an international interview.  I think Paulus had them looking for Natalee's remains or disposing of them and that is what the call was about.  What else on the face of this earth could be that important?  And cause that much sweating.

      And if we are going to be accused of being emotional rather than factual, I have had an image, a very strong one, of Natalee being in a professional body bag, the black zipping kind no matter what happened to her.  That has just always stuck in my mind that they had that professional touch to all of this.  I have also thought at some time she may have even been in the official morgue and that is where van der Straaten saw the evidence and we did not as he said to the reporter.  At some point he saw something that confirmed to him that Natalee was no longer living.  Yet somebody tore up a statement of Joran's made around that time.  Dave saw it on Jacobs desk.


      BINGO !!


      the confession that was not a confession


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: yapperz1 on October 23, 2006, 11:38:43 PM
      You betcha I believe Beth. I agree with San..whatever certain folks from the Rock say..the opposite is what happened.
      Nite all.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:38:53 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "yapperz1"
      I would believe The Ntional Enquirer b4 any of the TH's on the Rock.  :lol:


      Would you believe Beth is she referenced the call?  She has...



      The call happened.


      Absolutely.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:40:27 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "robots"
      so maybe PAULUS goes to work, leaves at 10 to go to the BANK  :roll:

      but he really goes to talk with someone on the phone, you really cant be talking about a murder cover up in your office, well in TOILET
      you can

      For your information i do not refer to ARUBA as ARUBA anymore, i only refer to it as TOILET, not the TOILET only TOILET


      PAULUS was making arrangements that morning from his cell phone  :wink:


      And the night of that confession Joran was said to be out of his cell.  Arashi beach was mentioned as well as was Canashito.  


      I agree with this Robots.  He left the office to take care of this "problem" that resulted from "something bad happening" and if we are going to be accused of acting on emotion rather than any facts I have always felt and emoted that it was VDStraaten on the phone calling when Paulus took the call during an international interview.  I think Paulus had them looking for Natalee's remains or disposing of them and that is what the call was about.  What else on the face of this earth could be that important?  And cause that much sweating.

      And if we are going to be accused of being emotional rather than factual, I have had an image, a very strong one, of Natalee being in a professional body bag, the black zipping kind no matter what happened to her.  That has just always stuck in my mind that they had that professional touch to all of this.  I have also thought at some time she may have even been in the official morgue and that is where van der Straaten saw the evidence and we did not as he said to the reporter.  At some point he saw something that confirmed to him that Natalee was no longer living.  Yet somebody tore up a statement of Joran's made around that time.  Dave saw it on Jacobs desk.


      BINGO !!


      the confession that was not a confession


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:41:48 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      He said he did four or five times.  Now we are told there was no call?  What the heck???

      I have just always backed off on trying to really really pin it down because I felt the family didn't want to talk about it and so thought maybe it was their weapon of last resort?  I have such hopes for this de Vries being a real investigator if the reputation he is given is true.  I would even like to think if this call exists, Beth will give it to him and it will be the Dutch who hear it first.  Let them think about that for a while.

      So is de Vries why Joran is JORAN.ANGRY! and locked his MySpace?  Does he know is exposure is at hand?

      Seems Peter de Vries is a national icon in this field.  I hope I am not getting my hopes up for nothing.  AGAIN.   :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 23, 2006, 11:43:58 PM
      I think the rules of the game changed when van der Straaten claimed he had seen the evidence.  What evidence?  Why didn't anyone in the MSM ever ask about that statement?  It, like many other things, was just tossed by the wayside for the next interview with Frog Face and Tickle Tito.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:44:48 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      Greta even reported this in her blog/daily written column.  I don't know what to think about it any more.   :?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:45:37 PM
      Deepak had to urinate twice in less than 45 minutes...


       
      “I was in the bathroom for a little while. I have no patience to look. After the bathroom I looked around somewhat. I walked past the bar, past the glass section where the "Carlos & Charlies" souvenirs of "Carlos & Charlie" are sold to the outside. When I was walking outside, I could hear the announcement that it was the last opportunity to buy alcohol. That is always announced before closing, I walked to my car.”
      Source: DEEPAK 6/09/2005 STATEMENT
       
       “I also didn't find them there, I then used the bathroom myself. . After I walked out of the bathroom, I called Joran on his mobile phone. He did not answer. I walked to the parking lot where my car was parked.”
      Source: DEEPAK 6/11/2005 STATEMENT and ADDENDUM
       
       “On the way to the "Lighthouse" me and my brother sat in front and talked and Joran and the girl were in the back and talked. I could not hear what they were talking about. At approximately where the “La Cabana Hotel” was, Satish popped in a DVD that had nude scenes in it. The girl said in English “Oh my God, whats that” (loosely translated by reporting officer: Oh my God, What is that). I then said to Joran in English: “Now she is going to think that we're perverts (loosely translated by reporting officer: Now the girls is going to think we are perverts). After a while Joran said to Satish in Dutch. “Switch off the DVD, she has had enough of it. Satish complied with the request. I had been driving on, in the direction of Arashi. When I arrived at Arashi I stopped the car on the asphalted section. I got out because I had to take a pee.”
      Source DEEPAK 6/11/2005 STATEMENT and ADDENDUM

       
      ”The 3 men: 2 Surinam , 1 Dutch. They took her to arashi beach and all 3 had sex with her. During her vacation nobody has seen her often because she was always hanging out with a lot of different people…”
      Posted by: Macamba | Wednesday, June 08, 2005 at 12:06 PM
      Source: http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/04/17/aruba-natalee-holloway-comment-post-6-2/

       “A lawyer for one of the Surinamese — Satish Kalpoe, 18, whose brother, Deepak, 21, also is in custody — said they told police they took Holloway to Arashi Beach, on the northern part of the island, in the early hours of May 30.”
      Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html  
       
       
      Transcript Nancy Grace for June 8, 2005, CNNHN Regarding bone found off of ARASHI BEACH
      “Still with us, CNN correspondent Karl Penhaul. Very quickly to Karl Penhaul, Karl, did either of the three young men who took Natalee from the bar that night ever tell police that they had slept with her, had sex with her?

      PENHAUL: We haven`t heard that directly because the evidence here and the witness statements here are highly confidential. The defense attorneys have seen some of those witness statements, I understand. But I do understand that, in the file, there are not three witness statements. I understand there are possibly only two witness statements.

      We do hear from police sources, however, that the three men, at least one of them, says that they did go to the beach with Natalee and had some fun. The interpretation of that, I`m not aware of, Nancy .

      GRACE: Now, is this coming from the defense attorneys?

      PENHAUL: That "fun" bit of information was from a police source, that the three men or one of the three men, at least, had said that they`d gone to the beach with Natalee after leaving Carlos and Charlie`s and "had some fun." They didn`t specify what "had some fun" meant, but the beach where the two had gone or where the group had gone have been searched. That, I believe, is called Arashi Beach .”
      Source: http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:uG0Rkl3_YLUJ:transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/08/ng.01.html+%22arashi+beach%22+witness&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4&ie=UTF-8
       
      “While snorkeling on 7-6 about a “half-mile from the Marriott off Arashi beach,“ FORNARO discovered one bone in the ocean that she found “between 2 large rocks.” FORNARO describes the bone as being 3.5” to 5.0” long, larger at one end that was rounded “like a bone joint,” gray in color, and still had a “whitish tissue that was still meaty and flesh-like that was still attached to the bone.” When asked if she thought it was a human bone, FORNARO said, yes, she thought it was a human’s bone because the bone had not been cooked nor barbecued like an animal bone might have been if eaten as food. FORNARO wrapped the bone in paper, but even wrapped in paper she described its smell as so pungently bad and so strong that she had to put the wrapped bone in the trunk of her car while she and her mother transported the bone to the ARUBA police station in Noord. When she gave the bone to someone behind the “reception desk” at the ARUBA police Noord station, the person who accepted the bone told her that the police detectives will be contacting her. On 7-13 while lunching somewhere, FORNARO noticed a “Texas EquuSearch” team member also lunching. FORNARO told the “Texas EquuSearch” team member about her finding the bone near the “Marriott Hotel,” she described the bone, and FORNARO said she had taken the bone to the ARUBAN police station in Noord and turned it over to the police. The “Texas EquuSearch” team member asked FORNARO to show him exactly where she found the bone, and FORNARO did so. While at the discovery location they also found a pair of thong underwear and a yellow-colored hair “scrunchie.“ The same day the “Texas EquuSearch” team member asked FORNARO if the police had contacted her. When FORNARO said the police have not contacted her, the “Texas EquuSearch” team member asked if she would mind going to the ARUBAN police station at Noord and checking on the bone. FORNARO agreed. When she went into the police station and asked to speak with a detective about the bone she turned in, the woman police officer asked FORNARO (paraphrasing), “Oh, you mean the two bones?” As of 7-17 FORNARO has still not been contacted by the ARUBAN police detectives.”

      I have talked with Jennifer Fornaro about this bone.  She has little doubt it was from a HUMAN.  Flesh intact, and the police simply threw it in a droor and would not offer her any details when she returned.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 23, 2006, 11:46:54 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Didn't Charlie crazy as a sh*t house rat Croes listen to the call ?


      Yes he did.


      It was reported there was a male sinister voice overheard saying "ARE YOU CALLING HOME?"


      Greta even reported this in her blog/daily written column.  I don't know what to think about it any more.   :?


      Don't know about he Male Voice, but Greta did make 'knowing' remarks about something to do with 'Miko' the monkey next door, and not just how he greeted them.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 23, 2006, 11:51:18 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Okay, I will say no more about the sounds... I get the message.  :roll:

      Lala's - I think the problem is this:

      #1 - we don't know for sure if there really was a call

      #2 - if MF and Scubajap are saying sounds of waves, then we can probably rule out "sounds of waves".



      We were originally told it was the sound of a car running.  Anyone remember my post one got out to open the gate, one got out to hold the dogs and one was driving while one got the cell phone and made the call.

      But i think scubajap is the source of as much disinformation as the Renfrog.

      Scubajap I believe to be that Angela friend of Julia.  But since my source for that is SandraK, take it for what it is worth.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:51:50 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Deepak had to urinate twice in less than 45 minutes...


       
      “I was in the bathroom for a little while. I have no patience to look. After the bathroom I looked around somewhat. I walked past the bar, past the glass section where the "Carlos & Charlies" souvenirs of "Carlos & Charlie" are sold to the outside. When I was walking outside, I could hear the announcement that it was the last opportunity to buy alcohol. That is always announced before closing, I walked to my car.”
      Source: DEEPAK 6/09/2005 STATEMENT
       
       “I also didn't find them there, I then used the bathroom myself. . After I walked out of the bathroom, I called Joran on his mobile phone. He did not answer. I walked to the parking lot where my car was parked.”
      Source: DEEPAK 6/11/2005 STATEMENT and ADDENDUM
       
       “On the way to the "Lighthouse" me and my brother sat in front and talked and Joran and the girl were in the back and talked. I could not hear what they were talking about. At approximately where the “La Cabana Hotel” was, Satish popped in a DVD that had nude scenes in it. The girl said in English “Oh my God, whats that” (loosely translated by reporting officer: Oh my God, What is that). I then said to Joran in English: “Now she is going to think that we're perverts (loosely translated by reporting officer: Now the girls is going to think we are perverts). After a while Joran said to Satish in Dutch. “Switch off the DVD, she has had enough of it. Satish complied with the request. I had been driving on, in the direction of Arashi. When I arrived at Arashi I stopped the car on the asphalted section. I got out because I had to take a pee.”
      Source DEEPAK 6/11/2005 STATEMENT and ADDENDUM

       
      ”The 3 men: 2 Surinam , 1 Dutch. They took her to arashi beach and all 3 had sex with her. During her vacation nobody has seen her often because she was always hanging out with a lot of different people…”
      Posted by: Macamba | Wednesday, June 08, 2005 at 12:06 PM
      Source: http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/04/17/aruba-natalee-holloway-comment-post-6-2/

       “A lawyer for one of the Surinamese — Satish Kalpoe, 18, whose brother, Deepak, 21, also is in custody — said they told police they took Holloway to Arashi Beach, on the northern part of the island, in the early hours of May 30.”
      Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159252,00.html  
       
       
      Transcript Nancy Grace for June 8, 2005, CNNHN Regarding bone found off of ARASHI BEACH
      “Still with us, CNN correspondent Karl Penhaul. Very quickly to Karl Penhaul, Karl, did either of the three young men who took Natalee from the bar that night ever tell police that they had slept with her, had sex with her?

      PENHAUL: We haven`t heard that directly because the evidence here and the witness statements here are highly confidential. The defense attorneys have seen some of those witness statements, I understand. But I do understand that, in the file, there are not three witness statements. I understand there are possibly only two witness statements.

      We do hear from police sources, however, that the three men, at least one of them, says that they did go to the beach with Natalee and had some fun. The interpretation of that, I`m not aware of, Nancy .

      GRACE: Now, is this coming from the defense attorneys?

      PENHAUL: That "fun" bit of information was from a police source, that the three men or one of the three men, at least, had said that they`d gone to the beach with Natalee after leaving Carlos and Charlie`s and "had some fun." They didn`t specify what "had some fun" meant, but the beach where the two had gone or where the group had gone have been searched. That, I believe, is called Arashi Beach .”
      Source: http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:uG0Rkl3_YLUJ:transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/08/ng.01.html+%22arashi+beach%22+witness&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4&ie=UTF-8
       
      “While snorkeling on 7-6 about a “half-mile from the Marriott off Arashi beach,“ FORNARO discovered one bone in the ocean that she found “between 2 large rocks.” FORNARO describes the bone as being 3.5” to 5.0” long, larger at one end that was rounded “like a bone joint,” gray in color, and still had a “whitish tissue that was still meaty and flesh-like that was still attached to the bone.” When asked if she thought it was a human bone, FORNARO said, yes, she thought it was a human’s bone because the bone had not been cooked nor barbecued like an animal bone might have been if eaten as food. FORNARO wrapped the bone in paper, but even wrapped in paper she described its smell as so pungently bad and so strong that she had to put the wrapped bone in the trunk of her car while she and her mother transported the bone to the ARUBA police station in Noord. When she gave the bone to someone behind the “reception desk” at the ARUBA police Noord station, the person who accepted the bone told her that the police detectives will be contacting her. On 7-13 while lunching somewhere, FORNARO noticed a “Texas EquuSearch” team member also lunching. FORNARO told the “Texas EquuSearch” team member about her finding the bone near the “Marriott Hotel,” she described the bone, and FORNARO said she had taken the bone to the ARUBAN police station in Noord and turned it over to the police. The “Texas EquuSearch” team member asked FORNARO to show him exactly where she found the bone, and FORNARO did so. While at the discovery location they also found a pair of thong underwear and a yellow-colored hair “scrunchie.“ The same day the “Texas EquuSearch” team member asked FORNARO if the police had contacted her. When FORNARO said the police have not contacted her, the “Texas EquuSearch” team member asked if she would mind going to the ARUBAN police station at Noord and checking on the bone. FORNARO agreed. When she went into the police station and asked to speak with a detective about the bone she turned in, the woman police officer asked FORNARO (paraphrasing), “Oh, you mean the two bones?” As of 7-17 FORNARO has still not been contacted by the ARUBAN police detectives.”

      I have talked with Jennifer Fornaro about this bone.  She has little doubt it was from a HUMAN.  Flesh intact, and the police simply threw it in a droor and would not offer her any details when she returned.


      Uh droor s/b drawer  :oops:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:53:31 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Okay, I will say no more about the sounds... I get the message.  :roll:

      Lala's - I think the problem is this:

      #1 - we don't know for sure if there really was a call

      #2 - if MF and Scubajap are saying sounds of waves, then we can probably rule out "sounds of waves".



      We were originally told it was the sound of a car running.  Anyone remember my post one got out to open the gate, one got out to hold the dogs and one was driving while one got the cell phone and made the call.

      But i think scubajap is the source of as much disinformation as the Renfrog.

      Scubajap I believe to be that Angela friend of Julia.  But since my source for that is SandraK, take it for what it is worth.


      All of which are associated with Charles Croes the local Santerian.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 23, 2006, 11:54:23 PM
      maybe the TOILET police checked already but what a simple thing to do

      1. contact the school and say we would like to see the ATTENDANCE records for monday for the entire school, in particular JORAN VANDER SLOOT


      2. was joran in school   YES _____  NO______

      3. was he on time YES ____  NO_____

      4. was he LATE ?  YES ______  NO____

      i think the toilet police know that he was not there and PAULUS knows it
      also


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 23, 2006, 11:56:22 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"


      So is de Vries why Joran is JORAN.ANGRY! and locked his MySpace?  Does he know is exposure is at hand?

      Seems Peter de Vries is a national icon in this field.  I hope I am not getting my hopes up for nothing.  AGAIN.   :roll:


      J2K will have a hearing on Nov 1 to be released as suspects.  DeVries show is around our TG. If J2K are dismissed what good will the show do?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:57:20 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "igsigs"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )

      MF got this from Scubajap who posted it on FOB last week. Where she got it i do not know...


      Okay, I will say no more about the sounds... I get the message.  :roll:

      Lala's - I think the problem is this:

      #1 - we don't know for sure if there really was a call

      #2 - if MF and Scubajap are saying sounds of waves, then we can probably rule out "sounds of waves".



      We were originally told it was the sound of a car running.  Anyone remember my post one got out to open the gate, one got out to hold the dogs and one was driving while one got the cell phone and made the call.

      But i think scubajap is the source of as much disinformation as the Renfrog.

      Scubajap I believe to be that Angela friend of Julia.  But since my source for that is SandraK, take it for what it is worth.


      All of which are associated with Charles Croes the local Santerian.


      Oh and coincidentally SandraK was the first to take credit for the Shango posts.   I understand she stated it was just a joke.  Hmmm... SandraK -associate of Charles Croes, Charles Croes - Continues to support Joran, and practices Santeria, the foundation for the Shango posts.  

      Disclaimer to the Charles Croes snitch here on SM: I am not implicating anyone, simply speculating.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 23, 2006, 11:59:28 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      maybe the TOILET police checked already but what a simple thing to do

      1. contact the school and say we would like to see the ATTENDANCE records for monday for the entire school, in particular JORAN VANDER SLOOT


      2. was joran in school   YES _____  NO______

      3. was he on time YES ____  NO_____

      4. was he LATE ?  YES ______  NO____

      i think the toilet police know that he was not there and PAULUS knows it
      also


      The contradictions in itself regarding this are enough to justify a warrant for arrest in this country.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:01:20 AM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      35 degrees tonight in Atlanta.  Brrrrrrrr.

      32 degrees where Gottenbos moved to.  I hope they brought warm clothes with them.


      5 degrees cooler at higher elevations where I am.

      I sure hope they brought their Aruban mittens and boggins!   :P


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:02:34 AM
      maybe he will cuddle with momma 8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: oldfart on October 24, 2006, 12:04:06 AM
      Quote from: "robots"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.

      I think the main players are paid, Glenda, MF, Scubajap and a few others.  The rest are lost soles that need to feel special and part of a group.


      you just NAILED it

      i think the word is SHILL  8)

      I quit donning the  wet suit (just to read there several months ago )(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/1108cf51.gif)

      NOT because of the &*(*&*&_##! posted  about any & everyone  ( that BS I can wade through )
      BUT...
      Given "Supposed contacts and Inside Information and passion for Aruba"
      that have NOT come forward with a  single hard item to dispel  even the simplest of questions(When & who went to Holland and when did they return? Where is AG's friends statement to the police about the 2:am sighting of the 2K's car on the road?)

      That group is a "different mind set... (being nice)"
      They do NOT care about the TRUTH!..  or ARUBA..!!(no matter what they say)
      If they did they would realize that things for Aruba are not AND will not be GOOD until the TRUTH comes forward whether they like it or NOT.

      Can I prove (based upon what I know) that J, 2K's, and others did anything to cause harm to Natale  ....~~~....  NO.

      Could  I (by U.S.) law have " certain suspects" in court or behind bars on "Lessor" charges?  I think so.
      Has Aruba or any support group asked the same questions ?  If NOT why NOT?
      But that is JMO & I do  NOT understand" their System"

      Until the people of ARUBA  and  the sites that blindly say
      "We have done everything to find "What Happened to Natalee" and we are seeking the "Full Truth"  "do more
      they can also keep this in mind when they DO NOT DO ANYTHING
      (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/3be1ee2b.gif)

      Do not get me wrong
      ~  there are people of Aurba that care..and want the TRUTH to come forward.  We need to find a way to help that happen.

      Sorry:  for the rant...

       :oops:  It has been one of those days and has/ is of those  Cruel Summers / Falls for Me :?  :oops:
      http://sg1.allmusic.com/cg/smp.dll?link=fnnvo3hcq3kx5epj52sbycn&z=MP3&r=20.asx
      or for just a MIDI
      http://www.hamienet.com/midi-3370.mp3
       See ya later this week.. maybe
      SeeYaByee  

      Justice For Natalee!

      Oldfart


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 12:04:26 AM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      35 degrees tonight in Atlanta.  Brrrrrrrr.

      32 degrees where Gottenbos moved to.  I hope they brought warm clothes with them.


      5 degrees cooler at higher elevations where I am.

      I sure hope they brought their Aruban mittens and boggins!   :P


      LOL.  It's likely toasty in the Gotmanboobs master bedroom with Koen's phat azz all snuggled up with renita and alex, sweating bullets and alcohol.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:04:59 AM
      hmmmmmmmmmmmm...remember when they took JORAN to the BEECH in CUFFS...

      was that near the HUTS ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 12:05:18 AM
      Quote from: "robots"
      maybe he will cuddle with momma 8)


      LMAO beat to the punch again robots!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:06:54 AM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "robots"
      maybe he will cuddle with momma 8)


      LMAO beat to the punch again robots!



      i will give you half credit, we will split it 50 50

       :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 12:07:04 AM
      Grande
      Thanks for reminding me about the Croes control aspect and the Santeria connection.  I had completely forgotten about that.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 12:08:20 AM
      And for what it's worth, even people in certain parts of Florida practice Santeria. :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 12:12:42 AM
      Y'all do know that the Nov 1 suspect release is needed for PVDS and family to be awarded their damages don't ya?

      PVDS sued on behalf of family VDS including JVDS and so JVDS needs to be release so they get their damages.

      Do wonder if the K2's will get their release just to help keep them quiet.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 12:14:14 AM
      Quote from: "robots"
      hmmmmmmmmmmmm...remember when they took JORAN to the BEECH in CUFFS...

      was that near the HUTS ?

      Not far..it was actually right next to the Marriott.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 12:14:20 AM
      Pretty sure Nov 1 one was when KJ was preparing to leave on vacation prior to DA's office change over of personnel and her return to Holland.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 12:14:45 AM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Y'all do know that the Nov 1 suspect release is needed for PVDS and family to be awarded their damages don't ya?

      PVDS sued on behalf of family VDS including JVDS and so JVDS needs to be release so they get their damages.

      Do wonder if the K2's will get their release just to help keep them quiet.


      Absolutely.  All parties involved will be released and then they hope to go back to being One Happy Island.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 12:16:16 AM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Y'all do know that the Nov 1 suspect release is needed for PVDS and family to be awarded their damages don't ya?

      PVDS sued on behalf of family VDS including JVDS and so JVDS needs to be release so they get their damages.

      Do wonder if the K2's will get their release just to help keep them quiet.


      Absolutely.  All parties involved will be released and then they hope to go back to being One Happy Island.


      And again it will be a great chuckle to see family VDS ripping off the poor aruban economy even further.

      Probably why the loan from Holland is being applied for.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: oldfart on October 24, 2006, 12:16:23 AM
      I'm gone

      but saw ROBOT   Upside Down  :shock:  :? ??? ( I think)
      Just want to leave this for them

      (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/gort-movie.gif)

      SeeYaBYeeee


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:16:30 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "robots"
      hmmmmmmmmmmmm...remember when they took JORAN to the BEECH in CUFFS...

      was that near the HUTS ?

      Not far..it was actually right next to the Marriott.


      oh,, thats right

      thanks klass


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:19:00 AM
      .
      Grande,
      OMG!  I don't remember ever reading that part about took her to the beach and "had some fun"!  I do recall very early AMDigital had in their written section that all three claimed to have had sex with Natalee.  

      Now we are down to not even Joran because there were no condoms left on the island after the MB kids arrived and required all of them to hear the Dark Side's version.  LOL!!  

      But the part about the beach is upsetting as I have sort of never really let my mind go there and preferred to think she lost consciousness early on and never knew what happened.  I pray to God that is what happened and I do not believe any of those involved are above having sex with a fully unconscious girl.

      And I guess we do what we have to do to deal with the painful parts of this and that is my way of dealing with it.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 12:20:22 AM
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      "stinking research,"  You got one part right -- stinking.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:22:01 AM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Pretty sure Nov 1 one was when KJ was preparing to leave on vacation prior to DA's office change over of personnel and her return to Holland.


      I think this is the reason.  KJ is being asked to present her case before leaving office for good and a replacement taking over the case??  And as a result also the VDSloots can continue their claim that their entire family was harmed and collect money from the Aruban tax payers.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 12:22:36 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "Leslie"
      But it is so much easier to trash and create fiction then to do research.
      I am sure Wang Chung doesn't do any stinking research!


      Yeh..I really think they must be getting paid...there just can't be that many mean/hateful people feeding on each other without some type of renumeration...They are so illogical...it makes my head hurt...at times, one has a spark of critical thinking and then BAM, the thought gets twisted and placed in the stupid bucket.

      I think the main players are paid, Glenda, MF, Scubajap and a few others.  The rest are lost soles that need to feel special and part of a group.


      The Chemelys pay the Scuba and Ms. Dooba, and the others were probably told there would be a "drawing" at the end of this thing and one of them would win a trip to Aruba (get to sleep in Dooba's guest cottage on the floor).

      I do believe we had two church sisters countin' on that.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:23:23 AM
      FROM THE MAIDS STATEMENT:

      Quote
      Amanda Yamileth GRUESO PORTOCARRERO,

      born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

      - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

      - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them.


      It is not unusual to see sand on a persons clothing who lives on an island like Aruba.  What this other maid really saw was blood all over Joran pants.  I am convinced there is another maid.  The usual maids hours were like the rest of her hours.  Did the Van der Sloots call a friends maid to come and help them in the morning because they couldn't get in contact with their usual maid.  Paulus wouldn't know her telephone number to get in contact with her and now the clock is running and they need help cleaning up the place.  Which friend volunteered  their maid.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 12:25:13 AM
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )


      Did you ever hold one of those sea shells up to your head when you were a child and hear the sound of the ocean in it?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:26:20 AM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "Anna"


      So is de Vries why Joran is JORAN.ANGRY! and locked his MySpace?  Does he know is exposure is at hand?

      Seems Peter de Vries is a national icon in this field.  I hope I am not getting my hopes up for nothing.  AGAIN.   :roll:


      J2K will have a hearing on Nov 1 to be released as suspects.  DeVries show is around our TG. If J2K are dismissed what good will the show do?



      It will be the same either way if they are still suspects or if they are released as they can be brought right back if there is new evidence discoverd.  But this program is in no way connected to the official court.  I am just hoping that the popularity of the show, etc. will cause the Dutch or Interpol or both to delve into the corruption and cover up.  Really, the only way we could get more information might be to break the cover.

      Sunfreak, your earlier theory of what happened that night is a good one and in my opinion entirely possible.

      Just don't know what to think any more.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 12:26:50 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      New postcard for Aruba:


      (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaBeachToilet.jpg)


       :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:28:15 AM
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      Quote from: "Ono"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Sound of waves?  Maybe near Lorenzo's?


      Question:
      I'm wondering exactly where did this MF "read" that there was the "sound of waves in the background", anyway ??  ( I'm rather leery, as IMO when they're making things up they go all out and dress them up in melodrama )


      Did you ever hold one of those sea shells up to your head when you were a child and hear the sound of the ocean in it?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



      Yeah, or the echo because their heads are totally empty!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:28:47 AM
      wanna know something funny ?


      paulus doesnt even "know" if JORAN went to school on monday but for months we have seen people with INSIDE info tell us that "OH YEA he was there"



      dont believe a SINGLE thing from EVIL POSTERS with a TOILET AGENDA  :twisted:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 12:30:16 AM
      JULIAR
      New name fits


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 12:31:32 AM
      Quote from: "San"
      FROM THE MAIDS STATEMENT:

      Quote
      Amanda Yamileth GRUESO PORTOCARRERO,

      born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

      - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

      - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them.


      It is not unusual to see sand on a persons clothing who lives on an island like Aruba.  What this other maid really saw was blood all over Joran pants.  I am convinced there is another maid.  The usual maids hours were like the rest of her hours.  Did the Van der Sloots call a friends maid to come and help them in the morning because they couldn't get in contact with their usual maid.  Paulus wouldn't know her telephone number to get in contact with her and now the clock is running and they need help cleaning up the place.  Which friend volunteered  their maid.


      Isn't there someone connected to STEVE CROES who worked as a maid?  Does anyone other than me have a recollection of that?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:34:34 AM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      JULIAR
      New name fits



      Good One, KatGram!

      And did anyone notice Stinky Pete disappeared when somebody got a little too close?  Rather ironic for one stalking others on the internet and then got scared himself, lol.

      I am hoping Peter de Vries is for real and really that good.  When he checks out anything they send him and see what whoppers they tell about things like the MB kids refusing to give cameras to LE, etc. right off the bat, he will know with what he is dealing.

      The only thing that concerns me is how much pure EVIL this case has seemed to attract.  Those of you who have covered more cases of this kind of loss have said it is common but I just can't imagine it being like this.  I don't understand why other than some are just attracted to and defend evil just as a way of life.

      As I have always said, they cheer for the clog in the Drano commercials.

       :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 12:37:04 AM
      Please post questions and concerns that De Vries might find interesting;

      Mine are very basic, but at least its a start. We can always revise and revise until we get it all and the right details or rumors.

      ~~~~~

      What happened  during Paulus’s year in the Netherlands studying for his judgeship that caused him to be dismissed? Was it more that failing an exam?  Did it have anything to do with his behaviors, activities, core belief system or what that they ofund him unsuitable?

      ~~~~~

      When Paulus first moved to Aruba he was doing one job for the Justice system, but was switched to the area of contracts b/c he was not performing well in the original position.  What was wrong with his job performance?

      ~~~~~

      How good of friends were Jan van der Straten & Paulus van der Sloot? Any truth to the rumors that vd Straten is Joran’s Godfather? And that Rudy Croes is Valentjins?

      ~~~~~

      When Joran and the Kalpoes were arrested on June 9th, the Kalpoe house was searched, but the vd Sloots was not searched until June 15. Why? And when it was searched, Ben (Vocking) King was present.

      ~~~~~

      Why did ALE arrest the 2 security guards when they already knew that Natalee had never been dropped off at the HI?

      ~~~~~

      Did Joran go to school that Monday May 30, 2005? If so how did he get there and when?  Was he sleeping during the classes and did he have bruises on his face.

      ~~~~~

      Did Paulus go to the NL with Anita for her family reunion/business?  Was he in Curacao the week she was gone.  Did he fly into Aruba that Sunday afternoon just in time to go to the poker tournament at the Holiday Inn?  Was that Paulus in the casino video of Joran playing blackjack with the MB girls?

      ~~~~~

      It was found out that 3 van der slots flew from the NL to Aruba on June1. Did this happen or were the 2 younger boys in Aruba the whole time?

      ~~~~~


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:42:34 AM
      Quote from: "robots"
      wanna know something funny ?


      paulus doesnt even "know" if JORAN went to school on monday but for months we have seen people with INSIDE info tell us that "OH YEA he was there"



      dont believe a SINGLE thing from EVIL POSTERS with a TOILET AGENDA  :twisted:



      Robots, I think at some point Joran was at school cause the headmaster told the friends of Jug that very early on Wed the same day Anita's broomstick arrrived from Holland.  Don't think he knew to keep his piehole shut yet.  Was telling some but not all of what he knew and what happend with Joran being at school.

      But what I think is ironic is I don't think Joran is sure if he was at school or not they were all so stoned and drunk.  I think Joran was totally souced and babbling all over the place and Paulus was called to come get him, maybe even one of the bank trips or lunch.  I think Joran was still drunk at school and had to be removed.  Passing out in the floor or sleeping we were told supposedly by students there.  One was named Tsunder and there were two others and Xander from Holland who also lived in Aruba but was in Holland posting.  At RWV.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 12:44:38 AM
      Quote from: "Tylergal"


      Isn't there someone connected to STEVE CROES who worked as a maid?  Does anyone other than me have a recollection of that?


      I ran accross this about S Croes today:


      On 9-11-05 “Websleuths” blog identity “soleil” reported:

      <QUOTE>

      being honest doesn't mean insulting others

      Join Date: Jun 2005
      Location: The Netherlands
      Posts: 402

      Steve Croes the dj telling his story
      Just got an aruban magazine "exclusivo" with Steve Croes giving his story about what happend. I wanted to share with you all, it was in the local language and i translated it as is:

      Steve Croes
      For curiosity i got myself locked up and after that without a job.

      It was a name that travelled around the world as one of the suspects behind the Natalee Holloway case. For 10 days Steve Croes was locked up at the polisstation in Playa, sleeping on a concrete bed, thinking about how God can help him for somebody to believe that he didn't know anything about the Holloway case.

      About 6 years ago Steve Croes came to Aruba to live. In Curacao he was a dj at a night club and it was till 3 years ago he got the job he wanted. I always said that my job as a discjocky on the boat Tattoo was unique, because they paid me to do what i liked and to "have fun". His taste for music is nothing strange considering that his mother is a singer and his father has a band and also was a dj in his younger years.

      Steve's envolvement in the Holloway case started when he visited an internet cafe at Playa. There was where he heard Deepak talking on the phone with another person making comments about how they dropped of the american teenager at a hotel and she fell. The girl didn't want any help but they helped her to get up. Deepak also said that even that he knows his phone is tapped he doesn't worry because he knows he is telling the truth.
      What Steve just heard made him curious and decided to go to Deepak and decided to lie to him saying that he was in the neighborhood of the hotel and that he saw them dropping of the girl. I told Deepak this just to see what else he might say to me but when Deepak realized what i said he told me that i could be a witness for him and his friends then. I backed out but obviously they used my lie to protect themselves to the polis what resulted in my arrest for 10 long days. Steve was asleep when hard knocking outside waked him up. Several polis were outside and they informed him that he is arrested in connection with the Holloway case.

      10 days of reflection on a lie that did cost a lot
      The 10 days that Steve stayed locked up at the polis station were everything but not nice. The bed of concrete, solitaire, mosquito's and the darkness where my biggest problems to deal with. I prayed everyday asking God to please let somebody believe me that i had nothing to do with this case and to let me go. There were moments that i lost faith of being released. Finally when i got my liberty it was a moment of joy and sadness at the same time as my lawyer informed me that the lawyer of my ex-boss had informed him that they wanted to end my contract. I had given the boat Tattoo a bad name and i am not the appropiate face to keep working for them. As i am not a problematic person i accepted their decision and took a 1 month salary and my vacation days they had offered me.

      Today Steve is happier. He just got a job at Carlos & Charlies, as a discjockey again, the job the he loves. What he learned: Curiosity kills the cat!

      <END QUOTE>


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 12:50:20 AM
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 12:53:48 AM
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 12:56:19 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?



      Could she have been Posner? :shock:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 12:58:32 AM
      Okay, I will take my silliness to bed now.  I have done enough damage to the world for one day.  Hugging Nemo at Camp Bow Wow...hope he's asleep and they are taking good care of him tonight.  Night all. :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 12:59:31 AM
      SunFreak - Thanks for taking a stab at assembling something for this show. (Although I think it's probably already been taped.)

      Here's what I've wanted to know all this time:

      What did Aruba Polis collect during that "tactical maneuver" of deferring the arrest of the 3?

      What do similar investigative personnel in The Netherlands think about this tactic?

      From 01/02/2006 Vanity Fair article (emphasis added):
      Quote
      Aruban investigations tend to move at what can seem a leisurely pace. "First, we investigate around [suspects]. We try to establish the facts, look at their backgrounds," says Dompig. "We want to keep them on the outside, where we can watch them, listen to their calls, see what they're saying to each other. If we have to pick them up, we can't look at them, other than in a cell."

      But the pressure to make an arrest—any arrest—was overwhelming. "The pressure was so … so … just, you could feel it on a daily basis: 'What is the press saying today? What is Beth saying today?'" says Dompig. "The Aruban government is very image-conscious. America is basically our bread and butter. The government, well, everyone was on our case. They wanted the case solved as soon as possible. And then you had the Aruban Hotel [and Tourism] Association, which is a very powerful group, that started putting pressure. 'Guys, what about the tourism! The jobs in the hotels!' Imagine how a law-enforcement team functions with all this. Imagine that pressure! We got calls all the way up to the White House! They called the prime minister!"

      Reluctantly, Dompig gave the go-ahead for the arrest of Joran and the Kalpoe brothers on Thursday, June 9. Joran emerged from his house with a blue-and-green towel wrapped around his head. After initial questioning, he was taken into custody. Today, Dompig says pressure from the Twittys, the media, and his own government forced police to prematurely make the arrest. "Yes, yes, yes," he says. "Under normal circumstances, we would have taken much more time to monitor them. We would have had much more evidence had we waited."


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 01:04:09 AM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?



      Could she have been Posner? :shock:

      I doubt Posner would be bothered with a blog.  No, I don't think she was Posner. :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 01:06:26 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?



      Could she have been Posner? :shock:

      I doubt Posner would be bothered with a blog.  No, I don't think she was Posner. :wink:


      I was just being sarcastic.  I should have said so.  :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 01:07:30 AM
      Lala's  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 01:08:28 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?



      Could she have been Posner? :shock:

      I doubt Posner would be bothered with a blog.  No, I don't think she was Posner. :wink:


      Relative? Family friend? I doubt it, but I'm with Tyler, there probably is some sort of connection between WW & this case.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 01:09:38 AM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"


      Isn't there someone connected to STEVE CROES who worked as a maid?  Does anyone other than me have a recollection of that?


      I ran accross this about S Croes today:


      On 9-11-05 “Websleuths” blog identity “soleil” reported:

      <QUOTE>

      being honest doesn't mean insulting others

      Join Date: Jun 2005
      Location: The Netherlands
      Posts: 402

      Steve Croes the dj telling his story
      Just got an aruban magazine "exclusivo" with Steve Croes giving his story about what happend. I wanted to share with you all, it was in the local language and i translated it as is:

      Steve Croes
      For curiosity i got myself locked up and after that without a job.

      It was a name that travelled around the world as one of the suspects behind the Natalee Holloway case. For 10 days Steve Croes was locked up at the polisstation in Playa, sleeping on a concrete bed, thinking about how God can help him for somebody to believe that he didn't know anything about the Holloway case.

      About 6 years ago Steve Croes came to Aruba to live. In Curacao he was a dj at a night club and it was till 3 years ago he got the job he wanted. I always said that my job as a discjocky on the boat Tattoo was unique, because they paid me to do what i liked and to "have fun". His taste for music is nothing strange considering that his mother is a singer and his father has a band and also was a dj in his younger years.

      Steve's envolvement in the Holloway case started when he visited an internet cafe at Playa. There was where he heard Deepak talking on the phone with another person making comments about how they dropped of the american teenager at a hotel and she fell. The girl didn't want any help but they helped her to get up. Deepak also said that even that he knows his phone is tapped he doesn't worry because he knows he is telling the truth.
      What Steve just heard made him curious and decided to go to Deepak and decided to lie to him saying that he was in the neighborhood of the hotel and that he saw them dropping of the girl. I told Deepak this just to see what else he might say to me but when Deepak realized what i said he told me that i could be a witness for him and his friends then. I backed out but obviously they used my lie to protect themselves to the polis what resulted in my arrest for 10 long days. Steve was asleep when hard knocking outside waked him up. Several polis were outside and they informed him that he is arrested in connection with the Holloway case.

      10 days of reflection on a lie that did cost a lot
      The 10 days that Steve stayed locked up at the polis station were everything but not nice. The bed of concrete, solitaire, mosquito's and the darkness where my biggest problems to deal with. I prayed everyday asking God to please let somebody believe me that i had nothing to do with this case and to let me go. There were moments that i lost faith of being released. Finally when i got my liberty it was a moment of joy and sadness at the same time as my lawyer informed me that the lawyer of my ex-boss had informed him that they wanted to end my contract. I had given the boat Tattoo a bad name and i am not the appropiate face to keep working for them. As i am not a problematic person i accepted their decision and took a 1 month salary and my vacation days they had offered me.

      Today Steve is happier. He just got a job at Carlos & Charlies, as a discjockey again, the job the he loves. What he learned: Curiosity kills the cat!

      <END QUOTE>

      So according to this interview Steve gave, Steve is incredibly stupid and Deepak is very smart :wink:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 01:27:30 AM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?



      Could she have been Posner? :shock:


      I definitely felt Wonder Woman was a man.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 01:30:20 AM
      Well, we have put everyone to sleep, or at least we know nemo has been hugged by Lala's and she is probably about to get some shut-eye.

      To the Georgia girls, I am going to be in your state in a few hours.  I hope to talk to you all by this time tomorrow, however.  Just a day trip.  Get it solved while I am away.  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 01:35:09 AM
      Nite Tylergal


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: crazymom on October 24, 2006, 01:41:27 AM
      Hey Monkeys.  Doing my daily drive by.

      Klaas, do you have a list of all the news agencies such as FOX, CNN, Bill Orielly, Nancy Grace etc?  I tried to look in the other threads with no success.   TIA


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: crazymom on October 24, 2006, 01:48:46 AM
      OMG!!!! My clock is correct for my posts!!! :shock:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 01:49:19 AM
      Sunfreak,
      Those are very good questions.  Should we start a thread?

      But I am a little confused as usual.  Has the show already been taped or is he investigating for two to three more o\months?  Would the thread about questions even be seen if we do it?  Also didn't someone provide at least links to all our basic information?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 01:50:28 AM
      Quote from: "crazymom"
      Hey Monkeys.  Doing my daily drive by.

      Klaas, do you have a list of all the news agencies such as FOX, CNN, Bill Orielly, Nancy Grace etc?  I tried to look in the other threads with no success.   TIA


      Try the American Who's Who thread.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 01:51:27 AM
      If Tyler gets to see the Pandas I am going to be too jealous!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 01:58:22 AM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Sunfreak,
      Those are very good questions.  Should we start a thread?

      But I am a little confused as usual.  Has the show already been taped or is he investigating for two to three more o\months?  Would the thread about questions even be seen if we do it?  Also didn't someone provide at least links to all our basic information?


      It probably would be a good idea to have all the questions we have in one thread.  I don't think the whole program has been taped.  That Lazlo talked to him today and it seems they are going with the premise that J2K are quilty.Maybe he will read here afterall Beth directed the Dutch to SM the last time.

      It can't hurt to have a questions list, even if it just for us.

      Ms Marple added a few questions too.  Go ahead and start a thread.  I can't keep my eyes open any longer.  Just cross post the questions.  I didn't number them b/c we may want to move the questions around and revise a few of them.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: crazymom on October 24, 2006, 01:59:58 AM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "crazymom"
      Hey Monkeys.  Doing my daily drive by.

      Klaas, do you have a list of all the news agencies such as FOX, CNN, Bill Orielly, Nancy Grace etc?  I tried to look in the other threads with no success.   TIA


      Try the American Who's Who thread.


      Thanks SunFreak2.  I haven't been posting here lately because I am working on something for a family friend regarding the murder of her 18 mo granddaughter by the stepfather and her other 2 grandchildren are still in the home with the mother who admitted she the abuse was going on.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:00:51 AM
      Klaas,
      Did I read that someone has sent to deVries at least links to all the important documents and the threads with information?  Hope I didn't imagine that!   :? And I think BFN probably sent that long 67 page summary.  I think they have some good articles like the one on conflicts in statements, etc.

      So he should have the basics?  I am sure he will think for himself and not be swayed by any group presenting nonsense obsessed with Beth.  All one has to do is read them making fun of her Hour of Power appearance to know that they have serious problems and a lack of respect for the faith of others.

      I remain hopeful that this is a plus for Natalee and her family that he will do this program with his stellar reputation.  No, it won't sway a judge in Aruba that has been bought but it sure won't help tourism either.

      JMO/


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 02:02:17 AM
      Quote from: "crazymom"
      Hey Monkeys.  Doing my daily drive by.

      Klaas, do you have a list of all the news agencies such as FOX, CNN, Bill Orielly, Nancy Grace etc?  I tried to look in the other threads with no success.   TIA

      If you mean the email links I don't think we have it any more.  I'm calling it a night now though.  I can' start a thread with links tomorrow.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 02:02:39 AM
      GOODNIGHT ALL!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:06:01 AM
      Sunfreak Let' s start the thread tomorrow.  I am full of cold meds and seeing double, lol.

      CRAZYMOM,
      That is just dreadful.  Have you brought this to Red's attention.  I am sorry I haven't checked the other threads in a few days.  There are so many sad and violent things happening and I will tell you that it is not always but last time I looked at the Detp of Justice stats it was something like 400 to one men being violent to women, not even counting the child like in this instance.  No wonder we have a violence against women's act and sure think we need to add children to that.  Many states are really cracking down on those who harm children while other states seem to look the other way so maybe it needs federal enforcement behind it.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:07:14 AM
      .
      Goodnight, all.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: crazymom on October 24, 2006, 02:12:46 AM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Sunfreak Let' s start the thread tomorrow.  I am full of cold meds and seeing double, lol.

      CRAZYMOM,
      That is just dreadful.  Have you brought this to Red's attention.  I am sorry I haven't checked the other threads in a few days.  There are so many sad and violent things happening and I will tell you that it is not always but last time I looked at the Detp of Justice stats it was something like 400 to one men being violent to women, not even counting the child like in this instance.  No wonder we have a violence against women's act and sure think we need to add children to that.  Many states are really cracking down on those who harm children while other states seem to look the other way so maybe it needs federal enforcement behind it.

      .


      I have been given permission from the family to start a thread here regarding this case.  It is another sad case.  Basically the stepdad started abusing her when she was 9 months old.  The coroners report is stating blunt force trauma to the abdomin resulting in 3 tears in her small intestine then basically watched her die and then called 911.  The BIG problem is the 4 year old sister stated she witnessed the stepdad kick the baby in the stomache.  It is truly a good ole boy system we are talking about and the GAL states the girls are not in danger.  

      Anyway,  the family is trying to get national exposure to get these girls out of harms way.

      Thanks for listening.

      Good Night.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 06:43:42 AM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Buckeye, according to witnesses, Joran loses money at the casino, but according to Paulus he wins money and gives it to Paulus to deposit.  This is a game Paulus and Joran play at the casino.  Play and lose, play and win, it doesn't matter because Paulus will make his large cash deposits the next day, regardless.


      there was a statement by one of the MB students that "they were watching Joran play blackjack because he was gambeling LARGE AMOUNTS OF MONEY."

      what large amounts equals, I do not know.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 06:56:11 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      MF at RU just brought up something interresting.  IF there was a phone call from Natalee saying "I don't know these people", where was it made from?

      MF wrote:

      I also read that they heard waves crashing in the background, no house near the Mariott area is that close to hear those waves that do not crash at that beach.

      Regarding Andre, I guess we should wait for PV's if they have this, to read about it. That they do not have it, does not mean that it does not exist, they only have I might guess, about 10% of the pages in the investigation....


      I wonder if the Gottenbos home is close enough to the beach to hear the waves crashing?


      We have a PV from Andre...what's this about??

      Well, if the wave bit is accurate...you could certainly hear them on a boat...

      Someone was speculating that the call might have been made from Andre Dos Santos home which is near the Marriott.  MF is saying that there are no homes near the Marriott close enough to hear the waves.


      what a load.  In the middle of the night when there is no background/traffic noise, you can hear waves crashing for a long ways.  We have any monkeys that live on or near the beach?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 07:07:23 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      So according to this interview Steve gave, Steve is incredibly stupid and Deepak is very smart :wink:  :lol:


      Yeah, like Dumb and Dumber.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 07:12:47 AM
      Quote from: "San"
      FROM THE MAIDS STATEMENT:

      Quote
      Amanda Yamileth GRUESO PORTOCARRERO,

      born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

      - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

      - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them.


      It is not unusual to see sand on a persons clothing who lives on an island like Aruba.  What this other maid really saw was blood all over Joran pants.  I am convinced there is another maid.  The usual maids hours were like the rest of her hours.  Did the Van der Sloots call a friends maid to come and help them in the morning because they couldn't get in contact with their usual maid.  Paulus wouldn't know her telephone number to get in contact with her and now the clock is running and they need help cleaning up the place.  Which friend volunteered  their maid.


      If so, then just how stupid is that? A horrific crime is committed, so involve your maid and/or call up Merry Maids to come help clean up the mess? How much collusion and/or arrogance would it involve to add yet another witness to one's wrongdoing?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 07:16:31 AM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "Anna"

      So is de Vries why Joran is JORAN.ANGRY! and locked his MySpace?  Does he know is exposure is at hand? Seems Peter de Vries is a national icon in this field.  I hope I am not getting my hopes up for nothing.  AGAIN.   :roll:
      J2K will have a hearing on Nov 1 to be released as suspects.  DeVries show is around our TG. If J2K are dismissed what good will the show do?
      It will be the same either way if they are still suspects or if they are released as they can be brought right back if there is new evidence discoverd.  But this program is in no way connected to the official court.  I am just hoping that the popularity of the show, etc. will cause the Dutch or Interpol or both to delve into the corruption and cover up.  Really, the only way we could get more information might be to break the cover.Sunfreak, your earlier theory of what happened that night is a good one and in my opinion entirely possible. Just don't know what to think any more.

      Even if it does not bring those authorities to look into it, hopefully it will be the start of making the entire kingdom aware of what the Slootys have done, thus warning their public of them. Pariahs in their own backyard.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: LilPuma on October 24, 2006, 07:17:27 AM
      Quote from: "oldfart"

      Do not get me wrong
      ~  there are people of Aurba that care..and want the TRUTH to come forward.  We need to find a way to help that happen.


      Oldfart


      You're a smart monkey.   :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: LilPuma on October 24, 2006, 07:19:24 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "Tylergal"
      I always wanted to know what Wonder Woman's connection to this case is.  I suspect if we could unravel that mystery, we could unravel a lot.  She was a paid liar's liar, no doubt, but it might solve this whole case if we could figure out who and what she was other than a crooked snake.

      WonderWoman lives/lived in Chicago.  Could she have connections to Posner?


      Huh?  Wha?

       :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 07:20:31 AM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      JULIAR
      New name fits


      Muhahaha!

      I'm reading back. Can y'all tell?  :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 07:22:21 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      New postcard for Aruba:


      (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaBeachToilet.jpg)


      maybe we could send a toilet to the ATA.  We could write TOURISM in the bowl, along with a little letter letting them know we are still here.  Think Jossey would cover it?  I'll pitch in.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Bearlyhere on October 24, 2006, 08:09:12 AM
      Good morning Monkeys!


      Title: morning all
      Post by: Leslie on October 24, 2006, 08:12:23 AM
      Diario
      http://www.diarioaruba.com/
      Amigoe
      http://www.amigoe.com/english/
      BonDia
      http://www.cspnv.com/
      Solo di Pueblo
      http://www.solodipueblo.com/
      AweMainta
      http://www.awemainta.com/
      Translator:
      http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:19:36 AM
      Quote from: "justinsmama"
      Quote from: "San"
      FROM THE MAIDS STATEMENT:

      Quote
      Amanda Yamileth GRUESO PORTOCARRERO,

      born at Narino in Columbia on August 5,1976, of profession living maid (servant) and living Monserat xxxxxxxxx on Aruba. The woman A.Y.GRUESO PORTOCARRERO aforementioned explained:

      - that she knows nothing of an illegal Colombian maid (servant) working at the VDS house.

      - that nobody told her that a maid said that she saw, in the early morning hours of Monday, May 30, 2005 clothing of Joran Van Der Sloot’s with white sand on/under them.


      It is not unusual to see sand on a persons clothing who lives on an island like Aruba.  What this other maid really saw was blood all over Joran pants.  I am convinced there is another maid.  The usual maids hours were like the rest of her hours.  Did the Van der Sloots call a friends maid to come and help them in the morning because they couldn't get in contact with their usual maid.  Paulus wouldn't know her telephone number to get in contact with her and now the clock is running and they need help cleaning up the place.  Which friend volunteered  their maid.


      If so, then just how stupid is that? A horrific crime is committed, so involve your maid and/or call up Merry Maids to come help clean up the mess? How much collusion and/or arrogance would it involve to add yet another witness to one's wrongdoing?

      No I didn't say call up Merri Maids.  They either had another maid or someone they know very well had their maid come over thinking it was just another job.  She did her usual cleaning (wash clothes, sheets, etc) and found Joran pants with blood on them.  At the time she probably thought nothing of it because Joran is a boy and she probably figured he got into a fight or something else.  When news got out about who was involved she but two and two together and figured that Joran did something bad to Natalee.  This is not unusual.  On that POS island it is pretty easy to make someone shut up we have been watching them do it for more than a year and a half now.

      SO I'M STICKING WITH THERE WAS BLOOD ON JORAN'S PANTS.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 09:46:02 AM
      Posted by Viet Vet on the front page:

      I would guess the van der Sloots and Kalpoes are not safe in Aruba. If I were a native Aruban, I would want to void our island of the guys who are bringing us down. There are nearly 100,000 people down there, and eventually some of them are going to look very hard on the PJ2K gang. Sleep well PJ2K, someone in your neighborhood may be watching and waiting. In the mean time, we in the USA will continue to boycott,block, and do whatever we can to bring down the corrupt govenment in Aruba.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Chicago_510 on October 24, 2006, 09:46:18 AM
      Remember Ernie Rizzo?  The PI from Chicago that was supposedly looking into things in Aruba.  I just heard that he died.  I'll try to see if I can get more info.  I think it was natural causes.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 09:49:55 AM
      Quote from: "Chicago_510"
      Remember Ernie Rizzo?  The PI from Chicago that was supposedly looking into things in Aruba.  I just heard that he died.  I'll try to see if I can get more info.  I think it was natural causes.


      http://www.wqad.com/Global/story.asp?S=5578600

      Famed private investigator Ernie Rizzo dead at 64
      CHICAGO Larger than life private investigator Ernie Rizzo is dead.

      The 64-year-old Rizzo died yesterday of a torn aorta at Chicago's Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

      Rizzo was known for his ingenious investigations and flamboyant style. He had been described by the media as "America's Number One Private Eye."

      Rizzo is perhaps best remembered for his work on the Michael Jackson and O-J Simpson cases.

      Rizzo is survived by his wife, Geraldine, a son and a daughter


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Chicago_510 on October 24, 2006, 09:50:00 AM
      Here's some more info about Rizzo.  Its a video clip from the news.  They said it was an Aortic Disection (spelling?) and he died at the hospital.  The video covers a few of the cases he worked on.

      http://www.nbc5.com/video/10141158/index.html


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 09:52:50 AM
      Need to get ready for class - see you all this afternoon!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:58:21 AM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Need to get ready for class - see you all this afternoon!

      Have a good day Klaas.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kimmy53 on October 24, 2006, 10:10:22 AM
      Quote from: "Chicago_510"
      Here's some more info about Rizzo.  Its a video clip from the news.  They said it was an Aortic Disection (spelling?) and he died at the hospital.  The video covers a few of the cases he worked on.

      http://www.nbc5.com/video/10141158/index.html


      If I am not mistaken, this is the same thing that happened to John Ritter.. Very Sad :cry:

      Good Morning Monkeys!

      Klaas - have a great day in class!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Mere on October 24, 2006, 10:20:56 AM
      Good morning friends.... :)

      Been reading back....some things come to mind.... :?

      Grande's quote...

      "Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving. He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student. To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed"

      I realize now that the threesome did not need to wait for the family to arrive on the island to develop an alibi...they knew immediately that they would be fingered by at least one MB student for whatever they did.....only a fool would continue....if anything happened to Natalee...kidnapping, rape, ???....here were American witnesses......someone with an IQ of 10 would have taken her right to the HI.....

      I think Sunfreak's idea re the way the injury occurred is right on....at some point she was mortally injured....and I think the three of them were there....

      Sunfreak's quote...

      "I still think Natalee tried to run at the lighthouse, but her legs were wobbly and she only got as far as the rocks before she tripped or someone tackled her. She was terribly cut and bleeding. They packed her back in the car, drove to the pond to wash up a bit and decide what to do with her. Either they dropped her at the huts with joran, or they dropped them at Joran's apt. I think she was alive for hours after the head injury. She was able to walk with assistance and talk. I think she was bleeding slowly in her head and between the booze, the drugs slipped her and the increasing pressure in her brain, she slipped in unconciousness and then she stopped breathing."


      and blah.....I live on Maui for some time and you can hear the waves from a distance....especially at night.....

      Mere


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 10:29:21 AM
      Good Morning All!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 10:53:41 AM
      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/th7ec40fb4.gif)
      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thhpytue.gif)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 10:55:46 AM
      Look at all the timeshares for sale in aruba...

      http://tinyurl.com/y62kw3

      http://tinyurl.com/ydjles


      what a dam shame :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kimmy53 on October 24, 2006, 10:55:56 AM
      I have been thinking about these statements by Paulus.  They really glare out at me.  What I think is VERY telling is the statements by him that He does not remember certain things.

      Okay - I ask you.  Have any of you ever been in a situation (perhaps not as serious as this one) but nevertheless, a situation in which you have to use hind site to look back on things?  In situations like that, you can remember alot of details, that if they happened on a normal day, you would not have a reason to try to remember.

      I guess what I am trying to say is HOW CAN YOU NOT REMEMBER???  Anyone would be rattling their brains to remember every detail - especially with the GRAVITY of the situation.

      I say his Amnesia is just a convenient excuse.  Oh He remembers alright.  He remembers it all.

      Someone is gonna knock the VDS's off of their High Horse.  Its gonna be a long fall.  The truth will come out.  I have a feeling for every one of those he has that will cover for him, there are 2 more who would love to put him in his place.  Are ya sweating yet Paulus? I hear that sweat falling like rain....  What goes around comes around...  JMHO


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 11:00:11 AM
      Grande's quote...

      "Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving. He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student. To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed"


      The only reason I can think of for them to continue is that she was drugged already. They had drinks in the car according to the statements. When Deepak changed the direction his car was going in because he saw the visiblity team, he did not want the visiblity team to see the drinks in the car and Natalee in a drugged state. ?  So, they continue with the plan of pre meditated rape. They had done this 20x before, nothing bad had ever come of it. They had confidence in that based on their past successes. Girls had complained to the police, nothing had been taken seriously. Tourist girls were likely to never be heard from or seen again.
      From the posting from Aruba, we can see that their attitude is that she got in the car , she was in Carlos and Charlies, she was friendly, she had a drink or two, therefore, she wanted it. Deepak even said she wanted to be with us. The attitude towards women on Aruba, the police , the status of the Van Der Sloots , their relationship with Jan Van Der Stratten , these things were in place and the whole plan of Joran, Satish and Deepak worked well for them. The system on Aruba is complicit to these events taking place.
      The only fly in this ointment was Beth and Jug and their hasty flight to Aruba. No one ever could have predicted that and the resulting sh*t storm unleashed.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 11:01:24 AM
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 11:02:13 AM
      .
      San,
      Joran was wearing black pants so I wonder if anything would show until they were put in the laundry?  Do you think the "sand" in Deepak's car that he had to remove was also talking about blood instead of sand?

      Also, Ernie Rizzo was involved in this inveatigation at one point working on behalf of the Sloots but I have forgotten who hired him to do so.   Anyone remember?  Was it Joe T?

      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/1005.gif)

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 11:06:18 AM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      that is something that also needs to be sent to DeVries as well as Gottenbos school/community


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 11:07:58 AM
      .
      Does anyone have confirmation from the MB student that she spoke to him from the car?  Or did he just see them driving away with her and yell for her to get out of the car?  Did this really happen or is it a Depak/Paulus fabrication.  I don't recall which MB student said he spoke to her.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 11:08:06 AM
      If anyone would like Jennifer Fornaro's email address contact me via Klaasend.  I have exchanged some emails with her, however if someone would assist me in getting her to offer more details regarding the bone found off of Arashi last July...

      WE NEED TO KEEP THE PRESSURE ON...

      And for those that may have something to offer, we need to remind them of the impact this is having on the Aruban economy.   ARE THE VDS' WORTH THE NEGATIVE PUBLICITY AND THE LOSS IN REVENUE??


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Red on October 24, 2006, 11:09:00 AM
      New Front Page Post:

      Oduber still met with Nicolai: To be a Fly on the Wall in that Meeting between Aruba & The Netherlands


      http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/10/24/oduber-still-met-with-nicolai-to-be-a-fly-on-the-wall-in-that-meeting-between-aruba-the-netherlands/


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 11:11:57 AM
      The cops have to recognize Jerry Strawberry/Cheramy Croes if we do.  They just don't intend to do anything because after all the woman was on the beach so she asked for it.  Why else would she be jogging?   :evil:

      And jogging in Aruba I'll bet she was wearing shorts, too.

      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thsarcasm.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 24, 2006, 11:32:23 AM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Grande's quote...

      "Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving. He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student. To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed"


      The only reason I can think of for them to continue is that she was drugged already. They had drinks in the car according to the statements. When Deepak changed the direction his car was going in because he saw the visiblity team, he did not want the visiblity team to see the drinks in the car and Natalee in a drugged state. ?  So, they continue with the plan of pre meditated rape. They had done this 20x before, nothing bad had ever come of it. They had confidence in that based on their past successes. Girls had complained to the police, nothing had been taken seriously. Tourist girls were likely to never be heard from or seen again.
      From the posting from Aruba, we can see that their attitude is that she got in the car , she was in Carlos and Charlies, she was friendly, she had a drink or two, therefore, she wanted it. Deepak even said she wanted to be with us. The attitude towards women on Aruba, the police , the status of the Van Der Sloots , their relationship with Jan Van Der Stratten , these things were in place and the whole plan of Joran, Satish and Deepak worked well for them. The system on Aruba is complicit to these events taking place.
      The only fly in this ointment was Beth and Jug and their hasty flight to Aruba. No one ever could have predicted that and the resulting sh*t storm unleashed.


      In addition to Grande's quote and your commentary, let us not forget the comment Deepak made about Natalee on the notorious tape, where he used sl*t to describe her attire and her behavior, etc.  

      Forgive me for not pulling up the exact quote before posting....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: sharon on October 24, 2006, 11:38:07 AM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      Good morning friends.... :)

      (snipped)

      Sunfreak's quote...

      "I still think Natalee tried to run at the lighthouse, but her legs were wobbly and she only got as far as the rocks before she tripped or someone tackled her. She was terribly cut and bleeding. They packed her back in the car, drove to the pond to wash up a bit and decide what to do with her. Either they dropped her at the huts with joran, or they dropped them at Joran's apt. I think she was alive for hours after the head injury. She was able to walk with assistance and talk. I think she was bleeding slowly in her head and between the booze, the drugs slipped her and the increasing pressure in her brain, she slipped in unconciousness and then she stopped breathing."


      and blah.....I live on Maui for some time and you can hear the waves from a distance....especially at night.....

      Mere


      Good to see you MeMere!

      I think Sunfreak's theory about 'how' it happened is spot on.

      It's the first thing that came to mind the first few days -- when we heard they took her to the lighthouse before dropping her off. That she got hurt trying to run away from them :(

      I also thought there was a possibility that she 'fell' over an edge into the water since she was not familiar with the area and she was impaired.

      I've also thought that some of the 'alibi' stuff was SOP. They did this 20 times before. I feel that they had an 'alibi' package already set in the event any of the previous 20 decided to try to file charges. Remember Deepak's comments -- yada yada yada -- and they can check my phone records. Very rehearsed.

      I think a lot of the alibi was preplanned -- but this time was different. Something bad happened.

      And I agree -- I live in south Florida (on Biscayne Bay though -- no waves) and I've been a 'beach' person my whole life. Hawaii, Caribbean, New Jersey, Florida, California ..... There's nothing more peaceful than being 'near' the beach, sleeping with the windows open and listening to the waves -- crashing or lapping -- onto the shore. zzzzzzzzzz :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 24, 2006, 11:40:26 AM
      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/06/earlyshow/main919948.shtml

      (CBS) It's been just over four months since Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway vanished during a school trip to Aruba, and the three young suspects in her disappearance are no longer in custody.

      CBS News correspondent Tracy Smith reports that a just-released audiotaped interview with one of the suspects holds some revealing details about what may have happened to Natalee.

      In the months following Holloway's disappearance, investigators descended on the island of Aruba looking for clues. One of them was Jamie Skeeters, a polygraph expert, hired by the "Dr. Phil" show.

      In August, Skeeters talked to Deepak Kalpoe on tape. Kalpoe, his brother Satish and friend Joran van der Sloot were the last people seen with Holloway.

      This is how Deepak Kalpoe described Holloway:

      "To tell you quite frankly, dressed like a slut, talked like one, too," he said. "Would go into a car with three strange guys, and her mother, claiming her to be the goody-two-shoes. Enough with this BS already."
      When Holloway's mother, Beth Twitty, talked to The Early Show's Hannah Storm last week, she shared her suspicions about what happened to her daughter.

      "I know this is really difficult for you to talk about, but you do believe that she was sexually assaulted. Is that correct?" Storm asked.

      "Absolutely," Twitty said.

      But Deepak Kalpoe had a different version. When an investigator asked if she had sex with all three, he responded, "She did. You'd be surprised how easy it was."

      Twitty thinks it is a possibility that she could have been drugged. But if Hollway was drugged, Deepak Kalpoe said he did not do it.

      "Let me ask you this," Skeeters said to Deepak Kalpoe. "I hear you can pay a bartender to slip a date rape drug in her drink."

      "I've never drugged someone," Deepak Kalpoe said.

      "Have you heard that happen?" Skeeters asked.

      "I haven't heard the bartender story," Deepak Kalpoe said. "I have heard the drug ecstasy. I've heard they slip that into drinks."

      But Deepak Kalpoe offered no clues as to where to find Holloway.

      "If I knew were the body is, I would tell them a long time ago," Deepak Kalpoe said. "Let them start the trial and get this over with. I don't care."

      While the outpouring of support for Holloway's family has been tremendous, Deepak Kalpoe said he is increasingly alone.

      "I don't have any close friends anymore. They are all gone," he said.

      "Really, because of this?" Skeeters asked.

      "Everything is empty," Deepak Kalpoe said.

      But this may not be the last we hear from Deepak Kalpoe. Prosecutors still consider all three men suspects in the disappearance of Holloway.


      ©MMV, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 11:43:51 AM
      Quote from: San
      Quote from: "justinsmama"



      No I didn't say call up Merri Maids.  They either had another maid or someone they know very well had their maid come over thinking it was just another job.  She did her usual cleaning (wash clothes, sheets, etc) and found Joran pants with blood on them.  At the time she probably thought nothing of it because Joran is a boy and she probably figured he got into a fight or something else.  When news got out about who was involved she but two and two together and figured that Joran did something bad to Natalee.  This is not unusual.  On that POS island it is pretty easy to make someone shut up we have been watching them do it for more than a year and a half now.

      SO I'M STICKING WITH THERE WAS BLOOD ON JORAN'S PANTS.


      I know that you were not saying that, San. I was exaggerating to demonstrate how pathetic the Sloots and that dirty little island are. They are stupid and arrogant and collude.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 24, 2006, 11:48:37 AM
      To be clear, my point is to support Grande's post that Deepak has displayed guilt.  The defensiveness in the statement I bolded from the Skeeters tape can be interpreted as guilt.  If innocent, why slander the missing Natalee?   If not involved, again, why direct anger toward her at this point?   Why not Joran, who by this time was supposed to have been the last to be with her, or others who played a part?  It doesn't fit for me.  jmho


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 11:55:27 AM
      Consent VS Kidnapping

      Grande writes: "Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving. He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student. To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed"

      I realize now that the threesome did not need to wait for the family to arrive on the island to develop an alibi...they knew immediately that they would be fingered by at least one MB student for whatever they did.....only a fool would continue....if anything happened to Natalee...kidnapping, rape, ???....here were American  witnesses......someone with an IQ of 10 would have taken her right to the HI.....


      This is a great post, and an important insight.

      IMO, the meeting exchange w/ MB male student when Natalee was in car and leaving the C&C scene, was highlighted by deepak in statements to avoid a kidnapping/abduction rap.  By testifying that Natalee was "willingly" in the car, the chances of "proving" kidnapping are lowered significantly.  Deepak is trying to insulate himself, and by extension, the other two, from these serious charges.

      HOWEVER, as you point out, deepak and his car are now fingered and likely positively ID'd as last to be seen w/ Natalee.  The MB student saw them.  With this knowledge available to all 3, why would they proceed with a criminal plan?

      Deepak, as more experienced and older perp, claims to stop the car and further claims to invite Natalee to leave the vehicle (both in statement and e-mail) -- why?  Because since he has been ID'd, there's significantly less chance that the nite's festivities proceed unhindered.  BUT, Natalee did not exit the vehicle, as we know.

      SO YES!!  They knew they needed an alibi, even before they left Orangstead right after C&C's closed.  

      But given this, and as noted above, why do you think they proceeded w/ a criminal plan after being ID'd?  Just stupid and gassed up?  Or some other reason:  other factors compelled them to proceed?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 12:01:19 PM
      Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
      To be clear, my point is to support Grande's post that Deepak has displayed guilt.  The defensiveness in the statement I bolded from the Skeeters tape can be interpreted as guilt.  If innocent, why slander the missing Natalee?   If not involved, again, why direct anger toward her at this point?   Why not Joran, who by this time was supposed to have been the last to be with her, or others who played a part?  It doesn't fit for me.  jmho


      I had a hard time trying to articulate my point last night.  In any event I appreciate your consideration and support.    

      Deepak made MULTIPLE attempts to portray himself as a 'good guy'.  WHY would he have to do that?  Clearly that is NOT the case.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:02:10 PM
      Even if it does not bring those authorities to look into it, hopefully it will be the start of making the entire kingdom aware of what the Slootys have done, thus warning their public of them. Pariahs in their own backyard.[/quote]

      Aruba and the Netherlands and to some extent this country as well promote what some call "A Culture of Rape" and have set advances made for women back too many years.  Maybe taken it into even another category for prostitution was brought back legally in the Netherlands around the time of the fall of the Soviet Union so they could take advantage of the impoverished women coming from that region.

      This blame the victim mentality is barbaric at the least and yet we see parents teaching it to their children.  Anita saying Natalee should not have gotten in that car is the same as teaching Joran that if he can get Natalee in the car he can do whatever he wants for that is what she is saying to some extent.  This is wrong.  No matter what a person does, it does not give another person the right to take advantage of poor judgment to rape or assault them in any way.  If that kind of thinking applies to rape it can be applied to other crimes as well and the victims blamed every time.

      This is wrong.  Women have the same rights as men and should be able to live their lives without unwanted contact and by live their lives this means they are as entitled to sexual expression as any other living being.  No one has the right to even touch another person against their will.  And I am speaking of touch in a sexual nature.  There are no conditions on earth that make that acceptable behavior.  None!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:03:44 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      .
      San,
      Joran was wearing black pants so I wonder if anything would show until they were put in the laundry?  Do you think the "sand" in Deepak's car that he had to remove was also talking about blood instead of sand?

      Also, Ernie Rizzo was involved in this inveatigation at one point working on behalf of the Sloots but I have forgotten who hired him to do so.   Anyone remember?  Was it Joe T?

      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/1005.gif)

      .


      Anna yes I do believe the sand was really blood in Deepak's car.  Where ever they mention sand it is really Blood.  Who would be worried about a little sand in the car.  They used the excuse that Deepak was meticulous with his car as a reason for someone seeing him washing it during the middle of the night.  These three kids are all lazy and if it was sand they would have waited until morning.  There was an urgency that night and the urgency was to get rid of the blood as best he could.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:07:18 PM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      Good morning friends.... :)

      Been reading back....some things come to mind.... :?

      Grande's quote...

      "Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving. He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student. To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed"

      I realize now that the threesome did not need to wait for the family to arrive on the island to develop an alibi...they knew immediately that they would be fingered by at least one MB student for whatever they did.....only a fool would continue....if anything happened to Natalee...kidnapping, rape, ???....here were American witnesses......someone with an IQ of 10 would have taken her right to the HI.....

      I think Sunfreak's idea re the way the injury occurred is right on....at some point she was mortally injured....and I think the three of them were there....
      Sunfreak's quote...

      "I still think Natalee tried to run at the lighthouse, but her legs were wobbly and she only got as far as the rocks before she tripped or someone tackled her. She was terribly cut and bleeding. They packed her back in the car, drove to the pond to wash up a bit and decide what to do with her. Either they dropped her at the huts with joran, or they dropped them at Joran's apt. I think she was alive for hours after the head injury. She was able to walk with assistance and talk. I think she was bleeding slowly in her head and between the booze, the drugs slipped her and the increasing pressure in her brain, she slipped in unconciousness and then she stopped breathing."


      and blah.....I live on Maui for some time and you can hear the waves from a distance....especially at night.....

      Mere


      Mere I agree with you.  All three were present when Natalee was injured.  Satish's statement proves that when he asked Deepak how the girl was.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:11:18 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      .
      San,
      Joran was wearing black pants so I wonder if anything would show until they were put in the laundry?  Do you think the "sand" in Deepak's car that he had to remove was also talking about blood instead of sand?

      Also, Ernie Rizzo was involved in this inveatigation at one point working on behalf of the Sloots but I have forgotten who hired him to do so.   Anyone remember?  Was it Joe T?

      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/1005.gif)

      .

      Anna, is it confirmed that Joran had black pants on.  Also, if they are black you can still see blood.  Especially if they were washed a few times and were faded a little.  These kids today wear all kinds of black pants especially the ones that are faded a little.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 12:14:18 PM
      .
      Oh, my!  What great posts we have going this morning!!

      And I have ot leave but will read them all when I get back.  I see tremendous thought behind each post this morning and the shades of truth that are coming out with these statements.

      I wonder if the person who leaked them anticipated that we would see them this way or if it was a member of ALE who thought we might think they did a good job and there was just no evidence.  Did ALE compare one statement with the previous the way we have?  Did they question the truthfulness of the answers?  Or just take them at face value as the truth?  I don't see how when each witness is a mass of contradiction.


      Joran's hobby was criminal law.  I believe they had in place now to make an alibi just in case someone brought charges, etc.  I think the use of some date rape drug was part of the routine so the girl could not remember what happened exactly and so could not press charges.  I think the fake phone calls and emails were preplanned things to do in case of trouble.  Twenty times is a lot of rehearsal.  Time to work out any kinks and account for anything really.

      Be back later, taters.  Keep up the good work as there is a tremendous amount of information just on this thread alone.

      .(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thrant.gif)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 12:15:14 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      Consent VS Kidnapping

      Grande writes: "Deepak clearly remembers the exchange between Natalee and the other MB'ers after leaving. He even went as far as saying he suggested that Natalee get out and 'go with her friends' after being summoned by the male MB student. To me this suggests guilt, and also suggests Deepak knew of the impending crimes that would be committed"

      I realize now that the threesome did not need to wait for the family to arrive on the island to develop an alibi...they knew immediately that they would be fingered by at least one MB student for whatever they did.....only a fool would continue....if anything happened to Natalee...kidnapping, rape, ???....here were American  witnesses......someone with an IQ of 10 would have taken her right to the HI.....


      This is a great post, and an important insight.

      IMO, the meeting exchange w/ MB male student when Natalee was in car and leaving the C&C scene, was highlighted by deepak in statements to avoid a kidnapping/abduction rap.  By testifying that Natalee was "willingly" in the car, the chances of "proving" kidnapping are lowered significantly.  Deepak is trying to insulate himself, and by extension, the other two, from these serious charges.

      HOWEVER, as you point out, deepak and his car are now fingered and likely positively ID'd as last to be seen w/ Natalee.  The MB student saw them.  With this knowledge available to all 3, why would they proceed with a criminal plan?

      Deepak, as more experienced and older perp, claims to stop the car and further claims to invite Natalee to leave the vehicle (both in statement and e-mail) -- why?  Because since he has been ID'd, there's significantly less chance that the nite's festivities proceed unhindered.  BUT, Natalee did not exit the vehicle, as we know.

      SO YES!!  They knew they needed an alibi, even before they left Orangstead right after C&C's closed.  

      But given this, and as noted above, why do you think they proceeded w/ a criminal plan after being ID'd?  Just stupid and gassed up?  Or some other reason:  other factors compelled them to proceed?


      Kidnapping without a doubt.  

      Natalee likely suspected this when the surinamese brothers offered a glimpse into their minds by displaying a porno video.  At that point I suspect the atmosphere changed dramatically.  This all before arriving at Arashi where Deepak had to relieve himself only an hour after doing so at CnC's.  I am highly suspicious of this stop and statement by Deepak.   If we agree Natalee was aware of the imminent danger shortly after the porno's then certainly she would have made an attempt to escape when Deepak stopped.  Or could this have been a stop necessary to subdue Natalee?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 12:15:57 PM
      OFF TOPIC ALERT>>> RANT ALERT>>>


       Easywriter, KISS MY A{{edit}}!  You came on this blog, threatened me, Red, Dana and other posters time and time again and yet we continued to allow your self absorbed posting of your picture over and over and over because some people felt sorry for you.... so we gave you the benefit of the doubt.  Then you bring your arguments with other blogs on this site and we were supposed to tolerate that as well....but this time he has gone too far... REd sent him the book that he bought at the auction and now I have sent at MY OWN PERSONAL COST OF OVER $20 another copy via UPS.... if I need to go to his level and publish the damn tracking number with his information, I will do it.

      THIS site does not take money from ANYONE and not deliver what was promised, hell some people will tell you that it took forever to get their cookbook checks cashed because I wanted to be sure there was delivery before I cashed the check....

      so take this rant for what's it worth... I am PISSED!


      TO every single one of you that understand why I am so upset I thank you from the bottom of my heart...

      rant over... sorry.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 12:17:11 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:20:27 PM
      Quote from: "sharon"

      Good to see you MeMere!

      I think Sunfreak's theory about 'how' it happened is spot on.

      It's the first thing that came to mind the first few days -- when we heard they took her to the lighthouse before dropping her off. That she got hurt trying to run away from them :(

      I also thought there was a possibility that she 'fell' over an edge into the water since she was not familiar with the area and she was impaired.

      I've also thought that some of the 'alibi' stuff was SOP. They did this 20 times before. I feel that they had an 'alibi' package already set in the event any of the previous 20 decided to try to file charges. Remember Deepak's comments -- yada yada yada -- and they can check my phone records. Very rehearsed.

      I think a lot of the alibi was preplanned -- but this time was different. Something bad happened.

      And I agree -- I live in south Florida (on Biscayne Bay though -- no waves) and I've been a 'beach' person my whole life. Hawaii, Caribbean, New Jersey, Florida, California ..... There's nothing more peaceful than being 'near' the beach, sleeping with the windows open and listening to the waves -- crashing or lapping -- onto the shore. zzzzzzzzzz :D

      I have said this from the beginning and I will stick with this.  If Natalle was in fact severely wounded they brought her back to the Van der Sloots.  They did not help her.  I believe it was Paulus Van der Sloot's decision not to help Natalee.  The boys ran to daddy for help because they knew she was hurt. Daddy did not help because he knew how bad this was for Joran.  Joran's life would be over as he knew it.  Paulus decided it would be better off to make Natalee disappear.  He never figured Beth would be as tough as she was.  He thought it would all blow over because he was dealing with a bunch of stupid Americans.

      CHARGES AGAINST PAULUS:  ACCESSORY TO PREMEDITATED MURDER.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:24:12 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      OFF TOPIC ALERT>>> RANT ALERT>>>


       Easywriter, KISS MY A{{edit}}!  You came on this blog, threatened me, Red, Dana and other posters time and time again and yet we continued to allow your self absorbed posting of your picture over and over and over because some people felt sorry for you.... so we gave you the benefit of the doubt.  Then you bring your arguments with other blogs on this site and we were supposed to tolerate that as well....but this time he has gone too far... REd sent him the book that he bought at the auction and now I have sent at MY OWN PERSONAL COST OF OVER $20 another copy via UPS.... if I need to go to his level and publish the damn tracking number with his information, I will do it.

      THIS site does not take money from ANYONE and not deliver what was promised, hell some people will tell you that it took forever to get their cookbook checks cashed because I wanted to be sure there was delivery before I cashed the check....

      so take this rant for what's it worth... I am PISSED!


      TO every single one of you that understand why I am so upset I thank you from the bottom of my heart...

      rant over... sorry.


      Mrs. Red
      please continue to RANT anytime


      anna does all the time





       :twisted: and we love it

      anna - im just teasing - i love the rants  :D  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 12:25:21 PM
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome.  With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 12:27:21 PM
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Sorry - had an extra space after the URL; messed it up.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 12:30:09 PM
      The Words of Joran van der Sloot

      Grande writes: "...Natalee likely suspected this when the surinamese brothers offered a glimpse into their minds by displaying a porno video. At that point I suspect the atmosphere changed dramatically..."

      SO, things may have been fine in the car, until they reached LaCabana and Satish put on the porno DVD.  So even if the MB student saw Natalee in the car a bit earlier -- everything would have "seemed" fine.

      But it is when Natalee is alone w/ them and the DVD goes in that she begins to realize she's in danger.

      Recall the words of joran when it was time to turn the DVD off: SHE'S HAD ENOUGH...

      Why would he use these words, this expression?  "Enough" of what? Viewing a pornographic scene?  Or something else...

      The time warp of criminal sexual assault is at work in some aspects of these statements; meaning that while aspects of the stories are relayed and transcripted in certain chronological  fashion, imo, there are instances where that does not accurately reflect what happened and what was said -- AT THE PRECISE TIME WHEN IT REALLY HAPPENED.  Their recollection is fueled by fear and contrivance, and the blood rush of the events they've authored and this reconstructs their memories of what actually happened, which is further warped by devious re-writing of the events for testimony.  And this a case in point: I have always believed that jvds really did say: "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 12:32:24 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      OFF TOPIC ALERT>>> RANT ALERT>>>


       Easywriter, KISS MY A{{edit}}!  You came on this blog, threatened me, Red, Dana and other posters time and time again and yet we continued to allow your self absorbed posting of your picture over and over and over because some people felt sorry for you.... so we gave you the benefit of the doubt.  Then you bring your arguments with other blogs on this site and we were supposed to tolerate that as well....but this time he has gone too far... REd sent him the book that he bought at the auction and now I have sent at MY OWN PERSONAL COST OF OVER $20 another copy via UPS.... if I need to go to his level and publish the damn tracking number with his information, I will do it.

      THIS site does not take money from ANYONE and not deliver what was promised, hell some people will tell you that it took forever to get their cookbook checks cashed because I wanted to be sure there was delivery before I cashed the check....

      so take this rant for what's it worth... I am PISSED!


      TO every single one of you that understand why I am so upset I thank you from the bottom of my heart...

      rant over... sorry.



      You call that a rant?  You didnt even use Sumbich one time  :roll:

















       :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 12:33:47 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      OFF TOPIC ALERT>>> RANT ALERT>>>


       Easywriter, KISS MY A{{edit}}!  You came on this blog, threatened me, Red, Dana and other posters time and time again and yet we continued to allow your self absorbed posting of your picture over and over and over because some people felt sorry for you.... so we gave you the benefit of the doubt.  Then you bring your arguments with other blogs on this site and we were supposed to tolerate that as well....but this time he has gone too far... REd sent him the book that he bought at the auction and now I have sent at MY OWN PERSONAL COST OF OVER $20 another copy via UPS.... if I need to go to his level and publish the damn tracking number with his information, I will do it.

      THIS site does not take money from ANYONE and not deliver what was promised, hell some people will tell you that it took forever to get their cookbook checks cashed because I wanted to be sure there was delivery before I cashed the check....

      so take this rant for what's it worth... I am PISSED!


      TO every single one of you that understand why I am so upset I thank you from the bottom of my heart...

      rant over... sorry.



      You call that a rant?  You didnt even use Sumbich one time  :roll:

       :lol:


      OK... put that in too!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 12:38:42 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      The Words of Joran van der Sloot

      Grande writes: "...Natalee likely suspected this when the surinamese brothers offered a glimpse into their minds by displaying a porno video. At that point I suspect the atmosphere changed dramatically..."

      SO, things may have been fine in the car, until they reached LaCabana and Satish put on the porno DVD.  So even if the MB student saw Natalee in the car a bit earlier -- everything would have "seemed" fine.

      But it is when Natalee is alone w/ them and the DVD goes in that she begins to realize she's in danger.

      Recall the words of joran when it was time to turn the DVD off: SHE'S HAD ENOUGH...

      Why would he use these words, this expression?  "Enough" of what? Viewing a pornographic scene?  Or something else...

      The time warp of criminal sexual assault is at work in some aspects of these statements; meaning that while aspects of the stories are relayed and transcripted in certain chronological  fashion, imo, there are instances where that does not accurately reflect what happened and what was said -- AT THE PRECISE TIME WHEN IT REALLY HAPPENED.  Their recollection is fueled by fear and contrivance, and the blood rush of the events they've authored and this reconstructs their memories of what actually happened, which is further warped by devious re-writing of the events for testimony.  And this a case in point: I have always believed that jvds really did say: "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn.

      .


      they saw that the DRUGS were taking effect on Natalee that was SLINKED into the Drink.   they figured she did not need any more of the drink or the drug

      thus the "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH"


       :evil:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:39:20 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome.  With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.

      I'm not klaas but here they are side by side:

      (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Jerry3.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 12:43:21 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome.  With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.

      I'm not klaas but here they are side by side:

      (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Jerry3.jpg)


      San thanks, check this one out > http://i13.tinypic.com/339ub11.jpg

      WE SHOULD SEND THIS EVERYWHERE!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 12:44:55 PM
      Quote from: "San"

      (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Jerry3.jpg)


      funny hpw a bunch of monkeys thousands of miles away can solve this one over the internet but the dam frosted flake eating pigs on the hellhole rock cant figure it out


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 12:54:38 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "msmarple"


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome.  With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.

      I'm not klaas but here they are side by side:

      (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Jerry3.jpg)


      San thanks, check this one out > http://i13.tinypic.com/339ub11.jpg

      WE SHOULD SEND THIS EVERYWHERE!

      WOW they look exactly alike.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 01:06:59 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome. With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      TY for that. I did not know and will never make fun of him again.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 01:12:24 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Does anyone have the Jerry Strawberry / Beach assailant comparison photo readily accessible?

      Thanks in advance,
      Grande


      Grande - If no one else has responded (and I know it's Klaas Class time  :lol:  ), a comparison is here:
      http://tinyurl.com/r84vy

      Future reference, it's included in the Murder & Crime thread summary, as part of the Tracey Allen incident.


      Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome. With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      TY for that. I did not know and will never make fun of him again.


      my pleasure.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: sharon on October 24, 2006, 01:33:42 PM
      Grande, Hammer, et al -- more proof (imo) of the 'damage control' to prevent a kidnapping charge.


      http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=213

      One of the boys responded and walked towards us. I hear the boy say: " What are you doing there. Are you crazy, get out of the car."(loosely translated: What are you doing. Are you nuts/crazy. Get out of that car).

      She didn't want to get out. I hadn't responded to it. I kept on driving at walking pace and stopped my car at the zebra crossing. I had done this because I thought it would be better if she went with her friends. To prevent problems because her friends clearly didn't want her coming with us. To your question as to what I mean by problems, I can state the following. The kind of problem that I have now gotten into. People would think that she would have gone with us against her will.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Leslie on October 24, 2006, 01:38:49 PM
      Mrs Red:  You might use this handy online parcel tracking site:
      http://www.track-trace.com/


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 01:56:51 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      [Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome. With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      TY for that. I did not know and will never make fun of him again.



      Well I don't see many of the attributes of Down's Syndrome in his features.  If he is able to function on the level to go to bars and get rip roaring drunk, he is also able to know basic right from wrong.  He would know hurting people and making them scream and cry is WRONG!

      IF he truly suffers from Down's Syndrome, he should NOT be allowed to go out and get drunk as Down's Syndrome would lower his self control.  An adult male past puberty is likely to act on those instincts in a combination of Downs and alcohol.

      Even with Downs Syndrome he is smarter than the idiots who allow him to do this.  In my opinion as a nurse, no one with Downs should be drinking at all.  Sunfreak, what do you think?  We have a bunch of other nurses on here as well.  Were you not taught Downs have lower control so alcohol could well put him out of control??  

      JMO but think others will support this.  AND he knows it is wrong to hurt somebody if he has the ability to drive, etc.  Very high functioning for Downs Syndrome.  I sure hope he does not drive after a big night at Carlos and Charlies.  And I have seen him taking the photographs in another photograph.  

      So I may well continue to say things about him for I believe he would know making a woman scream is very wrong just the same as anybody else.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on October 24, 2006, 01:57:26 PM
      Quote from: "sharon"
      Grande, Hammer, et al -- more proof (imo) of the 'damage control' to prevent a kidnapping charge.


      http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=213

      One of the boys responded and walked towards us. I hear the boy say: " What are you doing there. Are you crazy, get out of the car."(loosely translated: What are you doing. Are you nuts/crazy. Get out of that car).

      She didn't want to get out. I hadn't responded to it. I kept on driving at walking pace and stopped my car at the zebra crossing. I had done this because I thought it would be better if she went with her friends. To prevent problems because her friends clearly didn't want her coming with us. To your question as to what I mean by problems, I can state the following. The kind of problem that I have now gotten into. People would think that she would have gone with us against her will.


      Yes, this was from Deepak's 6/9/05 statement, HI drop off story still in place, and following Beth, Jug & company's arrival and the suggestion that Natalee had been kidnapped, taken against her will.

      Good find, Sharon.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:05:14 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      [

      .

      Anna, is it confirmed that Joran had black pants on.  Also, if they are black you can still see blood.  Especially if they were washed a few times and were faded a little.  These kids today wear all kinds of black pants especially the ones that are faded a little.[/quote]

      San,
      Yes, I believe Joran said in one of his statements he was wearing black pants.  You are right for some of the black is so faded especially in all cotton as to be very light in color.  I did not mean she could not tell it was there for the blood would dry stiff as a board if there was a lot of it.  Just thinking out loud more along the lines that Paulus or even Joran might not notice it so much or might think the maid would not on the black pants.

      Not feeling the best and too lazy to type!  But I do agree with you on this and also think sand on a sandy island would not be worth mentioning.  We have a great deal of sand in our soil oddly enough here this far inland and it is just taken for granted.  Don't think anybody would say sand on pants as if they are dirty it is more or less to be expected.  But some of the best watermelons in the world are grown here.  The sand Scratches the heck out of hardwood floors, too, BTW.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: LilPuma on October 24, 2006, 02:05:50 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      The Words of Joran van der Sloot

      And this a case in point: I have always believed that jvds really did say: "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn.

      .


      I couldn't agree more.  Creeps me out.   :(


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 02:06:20 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      [Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome. With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      TY for that. I did not know and will never make fun of him again.



      Well I don't see many of the attributes of Down's Syndrome in his features.  If he is able to function on the level to go to bars and get rip roaring drunk, he is also able to know basic right from wrong.  He would know hurting people and making them scream and cry is WRONG!

      IF he truly suffers from Down's Syndrome, he should NOT be allowed to go out and get drunk as Down's Syndrome would lower his self control.  An adult male past puberty is likely to act on those instincts in a combination of Downs and alcohol.

      Even with Downs Syndrome he is smarter than the idiots who allow him to do this.  In my opinion as a nurse, no one with Downs should be drinking at all.  Sunfreak, what do you think?  We have a bunch of other nurses on here as well.  Were you not taught Downs have lower control so alcohol could well put him out of control??  

      JMO but think others will support this.  AND he knows it is wrong to hurt somebody if he has the ability to drive, etc.  Very high functioning for Downs Syndrome.  I sure hope he does not drive after a big night at Carlos and Charlies.  And I have seen him taking the photographs in another photograph.  

      So I may well continue to say things about him for I believe he would know making a woman scream is very wrong just the same as anybody else.

      .


      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Windsor on October 24, 2006, 02:15:21 PM
      hi everyone --

      was it ever confirmed that Paulus owns condo/s near the Racquet Club?  If so, how close to Arashi Beach would this be?  My initial instinct was that they had a "studio" set up there.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 02:15:24 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      [Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome. With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      TY for that. I did not know and will never make fun of him again.



      Well I don't see many of the attributes of Down's Syndrome in his features.  If he is able to function on the level to go to bars and get rip roaring drunk, he is also able to know basic right from wrong.  He would know hurting people and making them scream and cry is WRONG!

      IF he truly suffers from Down's Syndrome, he should NOT be allowed to go out and get drunk as Down's Syndrome would lower his self control.  An adult male past puberty is likely to act on those instincts in a combination of Downs and alcohol.

      Even with Downs Syndrome he is smarter than the idiots who allow him to do this.  In my opinion as a nurse, no one with Downs should be drinking at all.  Sunfreak, what do you think?  We have a bunch of other nurses on here as well.  Were you not taught Downs have lower control so alcohol could well put him out of control??  

      JMO but think others will support this.  AND he knows it is wrong to hurt somebody if he has the ability to drive, etc.  Very high functioning for Downs Syndrome.  I sure hope he does not drive after a big night at Carlos and Charlies.  And I have seen him taking the photographs in another photograph.  

      So I may well continue to say things about him for I believe he would know making a woman scream is very wrong just the same as anybody else.

      .


      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?
      [/b]
      Cheremy, what did HE do ?
      Thought the suspects were Joran Deepak, Satish and Paulus.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 02:19:06 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "Grande"
      [Ah thank you Msmarple as always.

      Cheremy Croes is no relation to Steve.  They are as you know very good friends.  Cheremy has Downs Syndrome. With regards to the Tracy Allen incident;  Cheremy/Jerry drives a "very very small car" I was told.  Trying to find out what make and model.


      TY for that. I did not know and will never make fun of him again.



      Well I don't see many of the attributes of Down's Syndrome in his features.  If he is able to function on the level to go to bars and get rip roaring drunk, he is also able to know basic right from wrong.  He would know hurting people and making them scream and cry is WRONG!

      IF he truly suffers from Down's Syndrome, he should NOT be allowed to go out and get drunk as Down's Syndrome would lower his self control.  An adult male past puberty is likely to act on those instincts in a combination of Downs and alcohol.

      Even with Downs Syndrome he is smarter than the idiots who allow him to do this.  In my opinion as a nurse, no one with Downs should be drinking at all.  Sunfreak, what do you think?  We have a bunch of other nurses on here as well.  Were you not taught Downs have lower control so alcohol could well put him out of control??  

      JMO but think others will support this.  AND he knows it is wrong to hurt somebody if he has the ability to drive, etc.  Very high functioning for Downs Syndrome.  I sure hope he does not drive after a big night at Carlos and Charlies.  And I have seen him taking the photographs in another photograph.  

      So I may well continue to say things about him for I believe he would know making a woman scream is very wrong just the same as anybody else.

      .


      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?
      [/b]
      Cheremy, what did HE do ?
      Thought the suspects were Joran Deepak, Satish and Paulus.


      he matches the description of a man a woman reported tried to rape her


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 02:23:19 PM
      Quote from: "Windsor"
      hi everyone --

      was it ever confirmed that Paulus owns condo/s near the Racquet Club?  If so, how close to Arashi Beach would this be?  My initial instinct was that they had a "studio" set up there.


      No confirmation, in fact it is likely not to be credible.  I had someone look at the owners list, past and current  :wink:  That's all I can really say at this point.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 02:24:34 PM
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Windsor on October 24, 2006, 02:24:36 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Windsor"
      hi everyone --

      was it ever confirmed that Paulus owns condo/s near the Racquet Club?  If so, how close to Arashi Beach would this be?  My initial instinct was that they had a "studio" set up there.


      No confirmation, in fact it is likely not to be credible.  I had someone look at the owners list, past and current  :wink:  That's all I can really say at this point.


      ok; thanks


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: sharon on October 24, 2006, 02:26:04 PM
      Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"

      Yes, this was from Deepak's 6/9/05 statement, HI drop off story still in place, and following Beth, Jug & company's arrival and the suggestion that Natalee had been kidnapped, taken against her will.

      Good find, Sharon.


       :D

      There are certain statements that just stick in my mind. This was one of them.

      However, I'm ALWAYS thrilled when I can find what I'm looking for. That doesn't happen too often :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 02:26:20 PM
      Cheremy is Steve Croes' best friend and coincidentally looks very similar to the physical description Tracy Allen provided of her assailant near the fishermen's huts only days prior to Natalee's trip/disappearance > http://i13.tinypic.com/339ub11.jpg


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 02:28:37 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      I don't know that she has seen the comparison of the sketch and Cheremy.  I will attempt to get an id from her, given I can track her down.   Good thought Kat!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 02:29:06 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      not that we are aware of, that is why we are keeping the pressure on, trying to get some response.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:29:51 PM
      Quote from: "LilPuma"
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      The Words of Joran van der Sloot

      And this a case in point: I have always believed that jvds really did say: "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn.

      .


      I couldn't agree more.  Creeps me out.   :(


      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/ththiagree.gif)

      Those are very odd words to use in reference to porn.  I would think it would be apparent if it were the porn.  However, this does seem to be a sort of place where things go wrong.  Something happened to alter their routine and they had to turn off the porn.  I think Joran was talking about the effects of the drug they had given her.

      So if it was the porn about which he was speaking, I would think it meant Natalee started to try to get away from them or fighting Joran in some way.  

      I would venture to say she had never seen anything like what they were watching for I had not until I started research for this disappearance.  Sure, I knew it existed and imagined what it would be and pretty accurately.  It's not rocket science.  I know people who watch porn and have heard them discuss it and have even been at a party where people were watching it but I would not as I find it offensive and degrading always to females.  It disgusts me far more than anything and is the biggest turn off I have ever encountered while doing searches for how it works.  Some things are not spectator sports and it makes me literally want to barf.  If she was alert enough to realize what she was seeing I am pretty sure she was just stunned.

      She was only 18 and remember Beth telling Dr. Schuller Natalee was the only one to do all the Bible verses.  I think if she encountered it before she would have left the room or just not watched it at all.  It does not have the same effect on females that it does on males, that's for sure.  Make that SOME MALES before I get flamed too badly.

      After delving into the BackSeatBangers and such I HATE porn.  It is a form of slavery of women.  I wish it were ALL illegal.  It saddens me to know what a huge industry it is and all the activity in that area.  I was stunned and I am older than dirt.  She was just a kid.

      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/2eq7xck_th-1.gif)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:37:28 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      [
      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?


      Well, Blah, I never encountered this either.  I don't know of one soul who suffers this that is allowed to drink and cavort around like this.  It's like a train with no brakes.  He could do other things as well such as start fights, steal, just anything that runs through his mind and he would not have the resources to control himself drunk.  Most people with Downs lead a very very structured and regimented lifestyle.

      This is not right and whomever is responsible for him should be charged with negligence.  Oh, right!  That would require a police force and prosecution, things that seem totally lacking on One Crappy Island.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 02:40:40 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "blah"
      [
      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?


      Well, Blah, I never encountered this either.  I don't know of one soul who suffers this that is allowed to drink and cavort around like this.  It's like a train with no brakes.  He could do other things as well such as start fights, steal, just anything that runs through his mind and he would not have the resources to control himself drunk.  Most people with Downs lead a very very structured and regimented lifestyle.

      This is not right and whomever is responsible for him should be charged with negligence.  Oh, right!  That would require a police force and prosecution, things that seem totally lacking on One Crappy Island.

      .


      The guy may be +++++++ or developmentally disabled, but he definitely dosen't exhibit any of the physical characteristics of Downs and from the photo's of his activities he dosen't seem to be exhibiting the behaviors of one with Downs.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 02:42:00 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "blah"
      [
      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?


      Well, Blah, I never encountered this either.  I don't know of one soul who suffers this that is allowed to drink and cavort around like this.  It's like a train with no brakes.  He could do other things as well such as start fights, steal, just anything that runs through his mind and he would not have the resources to control himself drunk.  Most people with Downs lead a very very structured and regimented lifestyle.

      This is not right and whomever is responsible for him should be charged with negligence.  Oh, right!  That would require a police force and prosecution, things that seem totally lacking on One Crappy Island.

      .



      I know someone who has a child (late teen) with Downs Syndrome.  Although this case may be a bit more severe than that of the pimp, i cannot fathom the parents every allowing this behavior.

      The only possible explanation is that the parents of this Cheremy must also run around that island drunk and high all the time themselves and are just too wasted to have any sort of responsibility for their child.

      how sickening.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 02:42:46 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      not that we are aware of, that is why we are keeping the pressure on, trying to get some response.


      For one thing he hangs out in bars with very sleazy people wearing T Shirts with obscenities on them.  He seems to be loosely connected to the PIMP gang or possibly a member.  At least he is in lots of photographs with them.  I don't think anybody said he DID anything but would like for Tracy Allen to at least see his photograph.  We are wondering if ALE has done anything on her case and think probably not because they really don't care if they can't pin Natalee's disappearance on him.  Maybe discussing him, it will get back to them that people are wondering why their inaction and lack of follow up on her case.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 02:50:57 PM
      THE BIG STORY   3/12/06
      Woman comes forward with story that she was accosted in Aruba just days before Natalee went missing.
       Tracy Allen: Has a timeshare by the Marriott Hotel.

      I was walking towards the huts, I noticed a car running, with lights on, and as I was walking, I thought it might he one of the fisherman's cars.
      As I walked to wind surfing shop, a man got out of his car and prevented me from going back to the beach. Wearing just a shirt. He said I am not going to hurt you, and then he started to back me towards his car, and tried to get me in his car. The fisherman were about 30 ft away. It was about 6:30 am in the moring. I knew they could see us, there would have had to been a struggle for him to get me in his car.

      Did your report this?
      I did report it to police right away, this happened for about 4 minutes, he got agiated and threatenend me. I ran back to the hotel. They called the police. They sent one detective. So far the police have not contacted me and I got information  from Tim Miller saying this man has been spotted and they turned his name over to the authorities. He is dangerous, still out there and he will probably assault other people.

      CHEREMY CROES aka JERRY STRAWBERRY
      JERRY's MySpace Details  
      Status: Single
      Here for: Networking, Friends
      Orientation: Straight
      Hometown: Aruba
      Ethnicity: Pacific Islander
      Religion: Catholic
      Zodiac Sign: Taurus
      Smoke / Drink: No / Yes
      Children: Someday
      Occupation: GOT MY OWN ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS
       

      Didn't the MB students mention a short, Hawaiian-looking guy talking to Joran at the Excelsior Casino on Sunday?

      Latest MySpace
      http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=17914351

      TRACY ALLEN'S DESCRIPTION:
      About 25 years old
      Dark complexion
      Round face
      Short black hair
      5'7" to 5'9" tall
      Glasses with metal frame

      DRIVING A LATE MODEL CAR
      (Didn't she say an older model white, Suzuki?)

      Weeks later, Dave is on the beach in that area & sees a guy matching  this description driving off...Dave gives the license plate number to ALE...He never hears a thing!  :?
      (http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/SCSCAR-2.jpg)
      I had thought this pic may have been taken as they all left C&C for the night...Steve in the BLACK vehicle & Jerry in the small WHITE one. It just as well could be from the Malmok or Arashi Beach parking area behind the huts/thatch cabanas.......


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Grande on October 24, 2006, 02:54:35 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "blah"
      [
      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?


      Well, Blah, I never encountered this either.  I don't know of one soul who suffers this that is allowed to drink and cavort around like this.  It's like a train with no brakes.  He could do other things as well such as start fights, steal, just anything that runs through his mind and he would not have the resources to control himself drunk.  Most people with Downs lead a very very structured and regimented lifestyle.

      This is not right and whomever is responsible for him should be charged with negligence.  Oh, right!  That would require a police force and prosecution, things that seem totally lacking on One Crappy Island.

      .


      The guy may be +++++++ or developmentally disabled, but he definitely dosen't exhibit any of the physical characteristics of Downs and from the photo's of his activities he dosen't seem to be exhibiting the behaviors of one with Downs.


      This is really not up for debate as far as I am concerned.  It has no bearing on this case.  I can tell you that I did not just throw that fact in the discussion without a reasonable explanation and the necessary due diligence to prove that fact.  I will not go any further and no offense intended.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 02:54:50 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      not that we are aware of, that is why we are keeping the pressure on, trying to get some response.


      For one thing he hangs out in bars with very sleazy people wearing T Shirts with obscenities on them.  He seems to be loosely connected to the PIMP gang or possibly a member.  At least he is in lots of photographs with them.  I don't think anybody said he DID anything but would like for Tracy Allen to at least see his photograph.  We are wondering if ALE has done anything on her case and think probably not because they really don't care if they can't pin Natalee's disappearance on him.  Maybe discussing him, it will get back to them that people are wondering why their inaction and lack of follow up on her case.

      .



      The ALE will not do anything with this case as they are trying to use it as a "decoy" to draw attention away from Joran.  They are trying to use this case to sort of say "look we investigated this and found out that it has been reported that there is some OTHER criminal in the area Natalee was dropped off by Joran who was giving a woman a hard time, trying to kidnap and or rape her around the same time Natalee went missing"

      They are trying to get all the mileage they can out of this, therefore we can hand them this guy on a silver platter and they will not investigate.  Sound familiar?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 03:06:52 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      I don't know that she has seen the comparison of the sketch and Cheremy.  I will attempt to get an id from her, given I can track her down.   Good thought Kat!


      I can personally guarantee that the FBI has seen our comparison of a photo and the composite sketch. Within the last month or so.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 03:08:08 PM
      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/ththpup-1.jpg)


      Grande,
      Not questioning you or your due diligence.  Just saying he should not be drinking if that's the case.  Dangerous.  Sorry if it sounded like I was doubting you.  I'm not but then again I don't want to vacation where those with this kind of disability are rip roaring drunk all the time.    :wink:

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 03:08:41 PM
      Quote from: "Grande"
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      I knew that he matched a description, but, had the lady who had the contact with him, did she make an id ?


      I don't know that she has seen the comparison of the sketch and Cheremy.  I will attempt to get an id from her, given I can track her down.   Good thought Kat!

      See my theory is that the sketch is pure BS.  They probably had Cheremy come in and model for the sketch.  It would be nice to find out from that lady if the sketch matches the person who attacked her.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 03:15:02 PM
      .
      I believe it was last Friday MF was posting on FOB that tourism figures were UP for the month of September.  He cited a bit of an article in Dairio so I am wondering if anyone knows anything about that and if it is true or not.

      That would be disappointing.  

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 03:19:06 PM
      .
      Does anyone remember Scubajap used to post about somebody who hung around the fisherman's huts and had been arrested six times for accosting women?  I thought she meant Leon von Loon at the time but now wonder if it could be Jerry Strawberry instead.  She said they were arrested two weeks before Natalee disappeared.  Then she got mad when we asked why so many arrests and no convictions, etc. so don't know who it was or if this is the same incident anything else.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 03:26:43 PM
      I don't mean to keep reiterating this, but Klaas (and others) - from the sound of this interview, it is the FBI that did the composite, in December 2005. (Of course I could be reading it wrong.)

      I would be shocked  :shock:  beyond recognition if ALE went to the trouble of getting a composite sketch from her when she initially reported it. (After all, she was "only assaulted" ... )

      http://tinyurl.com/o8h5l --

      Quote
      Rita: You go to the aruban authorities and you don't get any calls back from ALE?

      Tracy: No, first time I was contacted the FBI took my statement and didn't contact me again until December 2 when I did the sketch

      Rita: This is the sketch you contributed to ALE..is this a local guy do you think?

      Tracy: I believe he was local, he had an older car, not like a newer rental car that a tourist would have.


      AND - re. Down Syndrome - the effects can be quite mild to quite severe.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 03:39:29 PM
      Quote from: "msmarple"
      I don't mean to keep reiterating this, but Klaas (and others) - from the sound of this interview, it is the FBI that did the composite, in December 2005. (Of course I could be reading it wrong.)

      I would be shocked  :shock:  beyond recognition if ALE went to the trouble of getting a composite sketch from her when she initially reported it. (After all, she was "only assaulted" ... )

      http://tinyurl.com/o8h5l --

      Quote
      Rita: You go to the aruban authorities and you don't get any calls back from ALE?

      Tracy: No, first time I was contacted the FBI took my statement and didn't contact me again until December 2 when I did the sketch

      Rita: This is the sketch you contributed to ALE..is this a local guy do you think?

      Tracy: I believe he was local, he had an older car, not like a newer rental car that a tourist would have.


      AND - re. Down Syndrome - the effects can be quite mild to quite severe.

      Ok, so the sketch may have been done by the FBI and it is a sketch of the person who attacked her.  Gee, wonder why Cheremy hasn't been brought in for questioning?  :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: nonesuche on October 24, 2006, 03:44:58 PM
      Rita: This is the sketch you contributed to ALE..is this a local guy do you think?

      see, I find that clumsy in it's wording but in context it does appear the FBI executed it?

      If so I'm with you Klaas, why no interrogation of him?

      oh I found you another tool Klaas (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/explanation.gif)

      oh and this one is for when renfro is on MSM (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/gasmaskf.gif)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Mere on October 24, 2006, 03:46:16 PM
      From Hammer's post:  "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn."

      I don't either.....I wonder if it had something to do with additional drugs they administered in the car....perhaps something on a cloth that was held over her face.....or if it had to do with whatever forced sexual activities were occurring....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 03:47:35 PM
      Quote from: "nonesuche"
      Rita: This is the sketch you contributed to ALE..is this a local guy do you think?

      see, I find that clumsy in it's wording but in context it does appear the FBI executed it?

      If so I'm with you Klaas, why no interrogation of him?

      oh I found you another tool Klaas (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/explanation.gif)

      oh and this one is for when renfro is on MSM (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/gasmaskf.gif)

      That teaching one is cool, thanks!.  Hard to see the other one..is that a gas mask, lol  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: nonesuche on October 24, 2006, 03:48:15 PM
      yep a gas mask  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: nonesuche on October 24, 2006, 03:49:06 PM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      From Hammer's post:  "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn."

      I don't either.....I wonder if it had something to do with additional drugs they administered in the car....perhaps something on a cloth that was held over her face.....or if it had to do with whatever forced sexual activities were occurring....


      I agree MeMere which makes me wonder sadly, what she endured? Was she in pain?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 03:50:11 PM
      Quote from: "msmarple"


      AND - re. Down Syndrome - the effects can be quite mild to quite severe.


      You are so right Ms Marple.  But Jerry doesn't display any of the characteristic facies of a Down's person.  Whether Grande has seen Jerry's medical records confirming Down's, I have no idea.  Anyway, Jerry doesn't seem to play any part in this case except as a peripheral player who frequents CnC's and is friends with Steve Croes.

      Is it possible to view the archives on the CoolAruba photos from May 27 & May 29, 2005?

      Klaas - I took the liberty of posting the email addresses of the media & authorities in a new thread.

      Oh and a good day to all you beautiful monkeys.  Lots of stimulating thoughts the last couple of days.  I've been cleaning house & lurking today.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 03:50:29 PM
      http://www.nashspeakers.com/cgi-bin/speakers/display.pl?speaker=1005

      (http://www.nashspeakers.com/images/speakers/1005/beth_twitty.JPG)

      NASHVILLE SPEAKERS BUREAU

      Beth Twitty
      OCCUPATION:
      Teacher

      TRAVELS FROM:
      Alabama

      EVENT TYPES OR TOPICS:
      Civic Groups, College, Motivational/Inspirational, Public School, Youth, Safety & Security

      FEE:
      Call Us


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: nonesuche on October 24, 2006, 03:52:42 PM
      Thanks Klaas-

      Glad to know she has representation and hopefully these speaking engagements assist her in repairing her heart to some degree. Giving back can help, so I'm hopeful it does.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Mere on October 24, 2006, 03:55:18 PM
      Quote from: "nonesuche"
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      From Hammer's post:  "SHE'S HAD ENOUGH" -- but I don't think it had anything to do with the porn."

      I don't either.....I wonder if it had something to do with additional drugs they administered in the car....perhaps something on a cloth that was held over her face.....or if it had to do with whatever forced sexual activities were occurring....


      I agree MeMere which makes me wonder sadly, what she endured? Was she in pain?


      None...anytime anyone is taken against their will...by strangers....who are willing to rape and perhaps more....that person endures more than most of us are willing to think about....this case has made us look at and think about the underbelly of society....not a nice thing...but I have learned much....and I will be here until there are answers.... :?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: nonesuche on October 24, 2006, 04:00:15 PM
      I agree MeMere, it's so painful to think of those realities, isn't it?

      My daughter was attacked and we feel it would have led to rape had she not escaped and been smart enough to know what to do, but she was not drugged and jogging and an athlete - all of that weighed in her favor.

      Despite escaping it impacted her greatly for over a year, her psyche and her ability to trust or to feel safe. I am convinced Natalee never saw this coming, it breaks my heart, might have been my child and I never forget that.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 04:01:35 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "San"

      Anna, is it confirmed that Joran had black pants on.  Also, if they are black you can still see blood.  Especially if they were washed a few times and were faded a little.  These kids today wear all kinds of black pants especially the ones that are faded a little.

      San,
      Yes, I believe Joran said in one of his statements he was wearing black pants.  You are right for some of the black is so faded especially in all cotton as to be very light in color.  I did not mean she could not tell it was there for the blood would dry stiff as a board if there was a lot of it.  Just thinking out loud more along the lines that Paulus or even Joran might not notice it so much or might think the maid would not on the black pants.

      Not feeling the best and too lazy to type!  But I do agree with you on this and also think sand on a sandy island would not be worth mentioning.  We have a great deal of sand in our soil oddly enough here this far inland and it is just taken for granted.  Don't think anybody would say sand on pants as if they are dirty it is more or less to be expected.  But some of the best watermelons in the world are grown here.  The sand Scratches the heck out of hardwood floors, too, BTW.

      Now Anna you made me raise my eyebrow here.  You are not believing Joran right.  He is a liar.  If you say green he will say red.  I bet he had blue jeans on just like the ones he was wearing in the picture on the dance floor.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 04:05:22 PM
      Heavy Battery

      MeMere writes: "...I wonder if it had something to do with additional drugs they administered in the car....perhaps something on a cloth that was held over her face.....or if it had to do with whatever forced sexual activities were occurring...."

      A review of the numerous felony offenses the Aruban prosecutor's office charged Guido Wever with is instructive.

      What was the gay, make-up wearing, third rate tennis player, failed croupier, graduation-skipping, Aruba fleeing and now-aspiring male model up to for ALE and Prosecutor to single Guido out for the charge of "heavy battery"?

      SHE'S HAD ENOUGH.

      Where's a good lawyer who outs his own client while simultaneously flinging deranged Nazi epithets when you need one, eh Guido?

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: msmarple on October 24, 2006, 04:17:45 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Ok, so the sketch may have been done by the FBI and it is a sketch of the person who attacked her.  Gee, wonder why Cheremy hasn't been brought in for questioning?  :roll:


      Because - it's Aruba? she was "only assaulted"? boys will be boys? he has a mental problem?

      OR - maybe he was questioned. He explained that he couldn't remember. With ALE, that'll work.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 04:28:19 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      Heavy Battery

      MeMere writes: "...I wonder if it had something to do with additional drugs they administered in the car....perhaps something on a cloth that was held over her face.....or if it had to do with whatever forced sexual activities were occurring....".


      Remember the evidence found in the Colony.  The spray bottle and cloth.  We never heard anymore about them  I guess they went into the evidence box that was thrown in the incinerator.

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Evidencefoundincolony.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 04:40:12 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      [Now Anna you made me raise my eyebrow here.  You are not believing Joran right.  He is a liar.  If you say green he will say red.  I bet he had blue jeans on just like the ones he was wearing in the picture on the dance floor.


      As usual, you are right San.  What was I thinking??   :roll: I am just not used to the idea of people lying to the police but it's not even against the law in Aruba if you are a suspect.

      And furthermore, remember his first statement seems to be missing so the first one we have for him is much later than the Kalpoes, something like June 9 and by them he had time to sort it all out and put the fabrications in place.  

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 04:59:03 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"


      And furthermore, remember his first statement seems to be missing so the first one we have for him is much later than the Kalpoes, something like June 9 and by them he had time to sort it all out and put the fabrications in place.  

      .


      If the police were tracking them, didn't they find it suspicious when the Kalpoes went to the vd Sloots every day.  Did they just tap the cell phones or did they tap the land lines too?  I think all that tracking stuff was just hooey.  It was a ruse to give them time to get their stories together and the evidence disposed of.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 05:35:27 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "Anna"


      And furthermore, remember his first statement seems to be missing so the first one we have for him is much later than the Kalpoes, something like June 9 and by them he had time to sort it all out and put the fabrications in place.  

      .


      If the police were tracking them, didn't they find it suspicious when the Kalpoes went to the vd Sloots every day.  Did they just tap the cell phones or did they tap the land lines too?  I think all that tracking stuff was just hooey.  It was a ruse to give them time to get their stories together and the evidence disposed of.


      BINGO.  I bet the police even gave the Kalpoes a ride to the Sloots while the carpet in their car were being replaced.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 05:43:03 PM
      Tactical Maneuvers

      SunFreak2 writes: "If the police were tracking them, didn't they find it suspicious when the Kalpoes went to the vd Sloots every day. Did they just tap the cell phones or did they tap the land lines too? I think all that tracking stuff was just hooey. It was a ruse to give them time to get their stories together and the evidence disposed of."

      Indeed.  It seems as though ALE's "tactical maneuvers" fell short.  But I do think there was a whole lot of maneuvering going on.

      From Paulus' statement:

      *******************************************

      "...About 8.30 hours I was called by one of the guards in the hall
      of the justice building and he told me that Jan van der Straten wanted
      to talk to me. I took Jan van der Straten up to my room and there Jan van der Straten asked me if I could pick up Joran from school and bring him over to the police-station in Bubali. Jan said that it was wisest to do this immediately....

      ...I also was in almost daily contact with Jan van der STRATEN. I did not doubt the truthfulness of their story for one second. When we talked about the girl, we discussed what could happen if the girl would not re-appear. I was under the impression that the boys assumed that she would re-appear sooner or later. Af course we also discussed what if the girl did not re-appear....

      ....From what little information I got from Jan van der STRATEN, I got some hope that the girl was seen after she was dropped off at the Holiday Inn. He did not say this in so many words but I took that as an explanation as to why the boys weren't asked to give further statements to the police...."


      *********************************************

      Looks like part of those tactics are on display right here:

      1.  Instead of apprehending the perp, the Chief of Polis pays a personal visit to PVDS's office to ebcourge an appearance at the polis station in Bulbai to offer a "witness" statement.

      2.  The future suspect, pvds, is in daily conatct with polis chief van der Straaten -- DAILY CONTACT.  Let's put aside the obvious conflicts here to ponder this for a moment.  Is paulus "name dropping" here -- you know to inspire fear among the lowly interrogators that he, paulus, speaks daily with their ultimate superior, the vaunted Aruban polis chief?  Or is Paulus doing something else, like warning van der Straaten (and others) that he can pull the whole facade down by putting on the record daily conversations and leaving out the meat of the subject matter?  Paulus did not have to say this -- yet he did, and I think he's putting the polis chief on notice about who's going down here, and it ain't him and it ain't joran.

      3.  There's part of your answer about the polis "tactical manuevers" -- according to paulus they stopped pursuing jk2 for further questioning because van der Straaten believed that Natalee was sighted AFTER she was dropped off at the HI, and was therefore a runaway or similar: AND THEREFORE NOT kidnapped, murdered, etc.  Sounds like van der Straaten is channeling Steve Croes.  Wasn't it Steve who came forward to say that he saw the drop off at the HI...?  Gollywillikers!  Wonder who put Steve up to that?

      These Aruban polis and their tactical maneuvers..."playing cops and robbers."

      This would be silly if it weren't true, and to think a life was lost while these clowns conspired.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 05:50:10 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"


      Remember the evidence found in the Colony.  The spray bottle and cloth.  We never heard anymore about them  I guess they went into the evidence box that was thrown in the incinerator.

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Evidencefoundincolony.jpg)


      Every time I see the picture of the glasses I think of psycho Joran in the police car smiling with his glasses on.  He makes me sick.  You can just tell how sick and evil he really is.

      (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Glasses4.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 06:35:57 PM
      Quote from: "San"


      Every time I see the picture of the glasses I think of psycho Joran in the police car smiling with his glasses on.  He makes me sick.  You can just tell how sick and evil he really is.

      (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Glasses4.jpg)


      He looks demonic!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 06:42:35 PM
      Hi Monkeys... been reading... WOW...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 06:47:30 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Hi Monkeys... been reading... WOW...


      You've been reading? WOW!!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 06:50:04 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Hi Monkeys... been reading... WOW...


      You've been reading? WOW!!!


      well I don't know if I can add anything to what has been said... just wow lots of hard work and lots of thoughts that I so totally agree with...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 06:58:11 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Hi Monkeys... been reading... WOW...


      You've been reading? WOW!!!


      well I don't know if I can add anything to what has been said... just wow lots of hard work and lots of thoughts that I so totally agree with...


      Ah shucks, you didn't get it.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 07:08:17 PM
      I got it... just chose to shall we say... not take the bait?? :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 07:10:21 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      I got it... just chose to shall we say... not take the bait?? :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Ok, that's better, I was sooo dejected at my wit and charm not being recognized.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 07:10:35 PM
      "... a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material, and some foam."

      What does it take for the polis to report to the news media on Aruba that they found a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material?  First, it's an easily observable fact that they found a spray bottle.  However, how do you come to the conclusion that the unnamed material in the spray bottle is "suspicious?"   If they know enough about this material in the spray bottle to say it is suspicious, then why is it "unnamed?"  Why not just say it is ether or chloroform or some other substance not normally found in a spray bottle?  

      WHAT IS THE UNNAMED SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL IN THE SPRAY BOTTLE?  

      Were any DNA tests conducted on this bottle and material, if it was so suspicious?  You know, this lack of investigation drives me crazy.  They release information to the media and it's published and then we hear no more about it.  Gone, poof.  I say the "unnamed suspicious material" is either suspicious and needs to be tested, or it's not.  What is it, Aruba?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 07:13:30 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      "... a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material, and some foam."

      What does it take for the polis to report to the news media on Aruba that they found a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material?  First, it's an easily observable fact that they found a spray bottle.  However, how do you come to the conclusion that the unnamed material in the spray bottle is "suspicious?"   If they know enough about this material in the spray bottle to say it is suspicious, then why is it "unnamed?"  Why not just say it is ether or chloroform or some other substance not normally found in a spray bottle?  

      WHAT IS THE UNNAMED SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL IN THE SPRAY BOTTLE?  

      Were any DNA tests conducted on this bottle and material, if it was so suspicious?  You know, this lack of investigation drives me crazy.  They release information to the media and it's published and then we hear no more about it.  Gone, poof.  I say the "unnamed suspicious material" is either suspicious and needs to be tested, or it's not.  What is it, Aruba?

      It was revealed too quickly that all of those items had NOTHING to do with the case, IMO.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 07:15:16 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      "... a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material, and some foam."

      What does it take for the polis to report to the news media on Aruba that they found a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material?  First, it's an easily observable fact that they found a spray bottle.  However, how do you come to the conclusion that the unnamed material in the spray bottle is "suspicious?"   If they know enough about this material in the spray bottle to say it is suspicious, then why is it "unnamed?"  Why not just say it is ether or chloroform or some other substance not normally found in a spray bottle?  

      WHAT IS THE UNNAMED SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL IN THE SPRAY BOTTLE?  

      Were any DNA tests conducted on this bottle and material, if it was so suspicious?  You know, this lack of investigation drives me crazy.  They release information to the media and it's published and then we hear no more about it.  Gone, poof.  I say the "unnamed suspicious material" is either suspicious and needs to be tested, or it's not.  What is it, Aruba?

      It was revealed too quickly that all of those items had NOTHING to do with the case, IMO.


      Is this the substance that made Jvds say to them ... she has had enough


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 07:17:55 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      "... a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material, and some foam."

      What does it take for the polis to report to the news media on Aruba that they found a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material?  First, it's an easily observable fact that they found a spray bottle.  However, how do you come to the conclusion that the unnamed material in the spray bottle is "suspicious?"   If they know enough about this material in the spray bottle to say it is suspicious, then why is it "unnamed?"  Why not just say it is ether or chloroform or some other substance not normally found in a spray bottle?  

      WHAT IS THE UNNAMED SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL IN THE SPRAY BOTTLE?  

      Were any DNA tests conducted on this bottle and material, if it was so suspicious?  You know, this lack of investigation drives me crazy.  They release information to the media and it's published and then we hear no more about it.  Gone, poof.  I say the "unnamed suspicious material" is either suspicious and needs to be tested, or it's not.  What is it, Aruba?

      It was revealed too quickly that all of those items had NOTHING to do with the case, IMO.


      Is this the substance that made Jvds say to them ... she has had enough


      If you had asked me that question in June 2005 I would quickly answer NO.  After everything we've seen in this case now I'm inclined to say YES.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 07:21:46 PM
      me too klaas!!  I was lurking at work and read the discussion and thought OMG.. they are so right!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 07:24:40 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      "... a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material, and some foam."

      What does it take for the polis to report to the news media on Aruba that they found a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material?  First, it's an easily observable fact that they found a spray bottle.  However, how do you come to the conclusion that the unnamed material in the spray bottle is "suspicious?"   If they know enough about this material in the spray bottle to say it is suspicious, then why is it "unnamed?"  Why not just say it is ether or chloroform or some other substance not normally found in a spray bottle?  

      WHAT IS THE UNNAMED SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL IN THE SPRAY BOTTLE?  

      Were any DNA tests conducted on this bottle and material, if it was so suspicious?  You know, this lack of investigation drives me crazy.  They release information to the media and it's published and then we hear no more about it.  Gone, poof.  I say the "unnamed suspicious material" is either suspicious and needs to be tested, or it's not.  What is it, Aruba?

      It was revealed too quickly that all of those items had NOTHING to do with the case, IMO.

      Yes I agree. It was Aruba's plan that every time someone found a piece of evidence to quickly dismissed it.  We are seeing the actual true evidence (duct tape, glasses, bottles of cleaner, fabric, belt, bone on the beach, arm).


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 07:25:45 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      "... a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material, and some foam."

      What does it take for the polis to report to the news media on Aruba that they found a spray bottle containing an unnamed suspicious material?  First, it's an easily observable fact that they found a spray bottle.  However, how do you come to the conclusion that the unnamed material in the spray bottle is "suspicious?"   If they know enough about this material in the spray bottle to say it is suspicious, then why is it "unnamed?"  Why not just say it is ether or chloroform or some other substance not normally found in a spray bottle?  

      WHAT IS THE UNNAMED SUSPICIOUS MATERIAL IN THE SPRAY BOTTLE?  

      Were any DNA tests conducted on this bottle and material, if it was so suspicious?  You know, this lack of investigation drives me crazy.  They release information to the media and it's published and then we hear no more about it.  Gone, poof.  I say the "unnamed suspicious material" is either suspicious and needs to be tested, or it's not.  What is it, Aruba?

      It was revealed too quickly that all of those items had NOTHING to do with the case, IMO.

      Yes I agree. It was Aruba's plan that every time someone found a piece of evidence to quickly dismissed it.  We are seeing the actual true evidence (duct tape, glasses, bottles of cleaner, fabric, belt, bone on the beach, arm).

      And in the beginning we wanted to believe them  :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 07:26:27 PM
      I hope they rot in hell especially that fat bitch Anita.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 07:28:31 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      I hope they rot in hell especially that fat bitch Anita.


      I would say that sums up my feelings!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 07:28:53 PM
      Running over to my inlaws for dinner, be back in a couple hours


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 07:29:29 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Running over to my inlaws for dinner, be back in a couple hours

      Klaasend has to go and fix the computer again! :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 07:30:52 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Running over to my inlaws for dinner, be back in a couple hours

      Klaasend has to go and fix the computer again! :lol:

      OMG, please say no..was already there yesterday fixing the printer!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 07:31:56 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      me too klaas!!  I was lurking at work and read the discussion and thought OMG.. they are so right!


      Yes'm, I have to agree with you & Klaas.

      Now where would they get chloroform?  Which one was the budding scientist?

      Sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach) and acetone (nail-varnish remover) produces chloroform. (source: Wikipedia)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 07:32:23 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Running over to my inlaws for dinner, be back in a couple hours

      Klaasend has to go and fix the computer again! :lol:

      OMG, please say no..was already there yesterday fixing the printer!


      OH NO!!  too funny.. I just you remember you telling us before about all the sites your FIL likes to check out.... LMAO!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 07:32:28 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Running over to my inlaws for dinner, be back in a couple hours

      Enjoy your dinner Klaas.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: hummingbird7525 on October 24, 2006, 07:35:59 PM
      Hi M.onkeys,
      I'm so proud of how you all think!  Last couple of days has been so great lurking for me.  
      I'm I reading this correctly? In the same stinking statement PVDS said he wasn't sure Joran went to school on Monday.  Then he says he knows he didn't go to school on Monday?

      PVDS said:
      "To your question whether Joran went to school on Monday
      May 30th 2005, I can state the following. I cannot precisely recollect
      whether Joran went to school that day. It is possible that he did not
      go to school that day. "


      PVDS said farther down in the statement:
      I woke up Valentijn and Sebastian and I also said to Joran that he
      had to go to school even though he wasn't in the mood to go. I know
      that I insisted that he should go. A reason for that might be that he had
      already not gone to school on Monday. I then left for work. I think it
      was approximately 7.30 hours when I called the headmaster of the
      International School.

      Also did I read that Joran said somewhere about his dad having some sort of memory problem? I think if he did, that he was using that as a set the stage coverup for all this I can't remember holes, in PVDS's statements. Joran was being shown statements that others where making plus his father got to visit him every day. When he couldn't, Mommy did!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 07:36:31 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "blah"
      [
      In Aruba, it is perfectly normal to have liquored up Downs Syndrome people running around raping and killing.  Why do you think they call it one happy island?


      Well, Blah, I never encountered this either.  I don't know of one soul who suffers this that is allowed to drink and cavort around like this.  It's like a train with no brakes.  He could do other things as well such as start fights, steal, just anything that runs through his mind and he would not have the resources to control himself drunk.  Most people with Downs lead a very very structured and regimented lifestyle.

      This is not right and whomever is responsible for him should be charged with negligence.  Oh, right!  That would require a police force and prosecution, things that seem totally lacking on One Crappy Island.

      .


      The guy may be +++++++ or developmentally disabled, but he definitely dosen't exhibit any of the physical characteristics of Downs and from the photo's of his activities he dosen't seem to be exhibiting the behaviors of one with Downs.


      I have personally known two people in my life with Down's syndrome.  They were cousins.  Grandfather was a big time criminal lawyer.  I went to school with both of these kids.  They were "good old boys" who functioned well enough to attend school but not to learn on the same pace with their peers.  Because of their status in the town, one's father was the chief of police, one's father was the DA and the grandfather was a big time criminal lawyer, and the mother of one was the judge of probate, (the lawyer had 13 children, all of whom held positions in law enforcement).  They had attended school with the rest of us, liked to party, like to do what the other kids did and they had sexual urges and when someone with that lack of understanding, strength and lack of ability to understand what "rape" means, meets with a girl under circumstances she might not think dangerous, it can turn dangerous.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 07:36:38 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      me too klaas!!  I was lurking at work and read the discussion and thought OMG.. they are so right!


      Yes'm, I have to agree with you & Klaas.

      Now where would they get chloroform?  Which one was the budding scientist?

      Sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach) and acetone (nail-varnish remover) produces chloroform. (source: Wikipedia)

      Much like the "cleaning fluid" found in Deepak's car??


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Tylergal on October 24, 2006, 07:37:54 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Running over to my inlaws for dinner, be back in a couple hours

      Enjoy your dinner Klaas.


      Will that allow you time to clean up the computer? :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 07:40:28 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      me too klaas!!  I was lurking at work and read the discussion and thought OMG.. they are so right!


      Yes'm, I have to agree with you & Klaas.

      Now where would they get chloroform?  Which one was the budding scientist?

      Sodium hypochlorite solution (bleach) and acetone (nail-varnish remover) produces chloroform. (source: Wikipedia)

      Much like the "cleaning fluid" found in Deepak's car??


      Awh geeze, things are becoming clearer & clearer.  I wish there was a way to prove all of this.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 07:43:42 PM
      Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
      Hi M.onkeys,
      I'm so proud of how you all think!  Last couple of days has been so great lurking for me.  
      I'm I reading this correctly? In the same stinking statement PVDS said he wasn't sure Joran went to school on Monday.  Then he says he knows he didn't go to school on Monday?

      PVDS said:
      "To your question whether Joran went to school on Monday
      May 30th 2005, I can state the following. I cannot precisely recollect
      whether Joran went to school that day. It is possible that he did not
      go to school that day. "


      PVDS said farther down in the statement:
      I woke up Valentijn and Sebastian and I also said to Joran that he
      had to go to school even though he wasn't in the mood to go. I know
      that I insisted that he should go. A reason for that might be that he had
      already not gone to school on Monday. I then left for work. I think it
      was approximately 7.30 hours when I called the headmaster of the
      International School.

      Also did I read that Joran said somewhere about his dad having some sort of memory problem? I think if he did, that he was using that as a set the stage coverup for all this I can't remember holes, in PVDS's statements. Joran was being shown statements that others where making plus his father got to visit him every day. When he couldn't, Mommy did!

      I agree hummingbird.  Paulus got to visit Joran every day.  If it wasn't during the day he was snuck in there during the night especially when they were first holding him at the police station.  I'll even say he was taken to an undisclosed location during the night and we have Van der Straten and Jacobs to thank for that.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 07:44:49 PM
      SunFreak, you know they must have tested that "suspicious unnamed substance" and the ALE know what it is.  They would also know if there were fingerprints on the bottle and whose they are.  Do you think all this is in the jillion pages of files they claim to have?  I just doubt it.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 07:47:34 PM
      I just wonder if the Dutch investigators and de Vries have all the newspaper articles that we have read.  Just reading the local Aruban news reports would give them many leads to follow and "suspicious unnamed substances" to uncover and identify.  Now, this is all public record, so I would have to think these people are bright enough to access the local media regarding the investigation, wouldn't you?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: hummingbird7525 on October 24, 2006, 07:53:13 PM
      Oh San,
       I never even thought of daddy sneaking in at night.  Joran never had to sleep on concrete bed, they probably brought him in a Aero bed!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 07:56:39 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      I just wonder if the Dutch investigators and de Vries have all the newspaper articles that we have read.  Just reading the local Aruban news reports would give them many leads to follow and "suspicious unnamed substances" to uncover and identify.  Now, this is all public record, so I would have to think these people are bright enough to access the local media regarding the investigation, wouldn't you?



      That last one posted by Sunfreak would be very good to send to him.  Do we use snail mail or email or what to contact him?  I know it is too late for consideration for investigation for the program but at least he would have it.

      Also notice how the American media is comprised of "morons" and such but the Dutch investigative reporter is just the tops, totally awesome, etc.  Whassup with that?


      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 07:59:32 PM
      Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
      Oh San,
       I never even thought of daddy sneaking in at night.  Joran never had to sleep on concrete bed, they probably brought him in a Aero bed!


      Early on rumor had it the Sloots were staying with their good buds Ben (Voc)King.  I always thought it was the other way around.  Joran was sneaked home at night since King is over the entire prison system.  How conflicted is it to have the fam staying with him during the time Joran in jail?  

      And as such, King is a member of the prosecution team.  You don't suppose he told Paulus all their strategy?

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:11:14 PM
      Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
      Oh San,
       I never even thought of daddy sneaking in at night.  Joran never had to sleep on concrete bed, they probably brought him in a Aero bed!

      They made him as comfortable as possible.  Anita's comment at the court house was "he was supposed to be safe there".


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:12:17 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
      Oh San,
       I never even thought of daddy sneaking in at night.  Joran never had to sleep on concrete bed, they probably brought him in a Aero bed!

      They made him as comfortable as possible.  Anita's comment at the court house was "he was supposed to be safe there".


      if she wasn't in that category of big people that lie, she would have said safe and comfortable there....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:13:07 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Hi Monkeys... been reading... WOW...


      WOW...i'm impressed youve been readin !!!








      just kidding :P


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 08:14:36 PM
      When they show us things like the plastic Lysol bottle with a suspicious substance in it, the belt that we have seen Joran wearing or one identical to it in another photo and the piece that looked like Natalee's top the park ranger threw away into the water, does anyone else get the feeling they are rubbing our noses in the fact they have evidence but refuse to use it?

      I get so upset I just have to walk away and get over it.  Tell me I am just imagining that, please.

      . :twisted:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:16:25 PM
      It is my opinion Anna that yes they are rubbing our noses in it and they are hoping that we just walk away out of frustration....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: hummingbird7525 on October 24, 2006, 08:17:33 PM
      Quote

      Early on rumor had it the Sloots were staying with their good buds Ben (Voc)King. I always thought it was the other way around. Joran was sneaked home at night since King is over the entire prison system. How conflicted is it to have the fam staying with him during the time Joran in jail?

      And as such, King is a member of the prosecution team. You don't suppose he told Paulus all their strategy?

      The more I hear, I just want to throw up! These people should not get away with any of this. Maybe Peter will blow open the case, with what ever he found out.
      Where does Ben King live? You know Paulus knew their strategy, Joran wasn't worried about getting out.  His brother Valintjin (sp) was telling everyone the day Joran was getting out just like he knew and had insight, when he was filling in for Joran on website.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 08:18:28 PM
      Here you go, Mrs. Red, for all those teasing you


      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thphrase42.gif)

      . :?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: hummingbird7525 on October 24, 2006, 08:19:03 PM
      Oops. sorry I messed that up!!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 08:20:43 PM
      The Aruban girl, Aarubaanse, has posted on the FP that she has heard from a person connected to P De Vreies. She gave him the name of this site.
      She is a sweetie pie.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 08:21:05 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      I just wonder if the Dutch investigators and de Vries have all the newspaper articles that we have read.  Just reading the local Aruban news reports would give them many leads to follow and "suspicious unnamed substances" to uncover and identify.  Now, this is all public record, so I would have to think these people are bright enough to access the local media regarding the investigation, wouldn't you?


      What evidence or items were found where?

      Lighthouse/California sand dunes/Arashi Beach -
      belt (8-12-05)
      bits of plastic (8-12-05)
      aru-bay rocks (6-10-05)
      bone with flesh - said to be a donkey bone

      Marriott/Fisherman's Huts
      panties (6-14-05)
      condoms (6-14-05)
      bikini strap (6-14-05)
      bone with flesh on it (7-6-05)

      Colony
      sunglasses (6-6-06)
      VCB shirt (6-6-06)
      spray bottle with suspicious substance (6-6-06)
      foam with bite marks (6-6-06)
      mattress with dog blood (6-5-06)

      Boca Tortuga area of Arikok Park
      duct tape with blonde hairs (7-17-05
      fabric matching Natalee's top(7-17-05)
      Shallow Grave (7-12-05)

      CarlosNCharlie's
      International Diamonds security tape (5-30-05)


      Title: o/t
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 08:22:37 PM
      Quote
      Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject:    

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      YEP.....A very creepy family!

      Kawish was there that Monday after tennis at the casinos



      Hey Florida,
      how do u know that Kawish was at the casinos that Monday after tennis??

      byebye


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 08:22:49 PM
      Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
      Oops. sorry I messed that up!!!



      Its OK, we know what you mean and can read it.  No prob.

      Yes, it makes me ill.  And so angry I start shaking.  I just can't believe anybody would be so cruel with a missing and likely dead child involved.
      It is beyond comprehension.  At the risk of getting yet another lecture from Old Fart, it just makes me hate them.  It's like it is a big joke or something to them.  All of them smirking and lying and sending out decoys and all of it is just too much.

      Yes, I hope de Vries exposes enough corruption that they investigate and some of these people are punished for failure to do their job, etc. ALE obstructed justice!  How's that for insane!''.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 08:24:29 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "Anna"


      And furthermore, remember his first statement seems to be missing so the first one we have for him is much later than the Kalpoes, something like June 9 and by them he had time to sort it all out and put the fabrications in place.  

      .


      If the police were tracking them, didn't they find it suspicious when the Kalpoes went to the vd Sloots every day.  Did they just tap the cell phones or did they tap the land lines too?  I think all that tracking stuff was just hooey.  It was a ruse to give them time to get their stories together and the evidence disposed of.

      I think the surveillence consisted of a land line tap. They could get the phone calls made and to who from the cell provider, but no content. They did a pathetic job of their " investigation ".


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:29:11 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      It is my opinion Anna that yes they are rubbing our noses in it and they are hoping that we just walk away out of frustration....


      yeah but at the end of the day, the no good aloe pickers are hoping they can increase sales of their cheap ass nappy shampoo and soap on a rope to make up for the decline in tourism just so they can buy a bag of weed at the end of the week.

      Pretty soon they wont be able to afford shots of 151 and there will be no decendants of Hitler to go shark seeing with.  Who will they brag to about their off the scale intelligence and wanna be soccer star status?

      Where will the casinos go when the tourists are gone and Bush shuts down the online gambling?  Doesnt sound good for Sunday night out with paw to do some "free" gambling, kidnapping, raping and killing.

      They thumb thier bullshit at us now but we will have the last laugh.  Enjoy your cornflakes now fatass, your boxes are numbered.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 08:29:44 PM
      I got $100 in $1 at the bank for this week and will write "Boycott Aruba Justice for Natalee Holloway" on all of them.  Probably I'll get arrested for defacing currency while the suspects go free courtesy of their friends in high places.

      I just don't know anything more to do or I would do it.  I do think that Joran.Angry!  may be angry because of something related to this program.  Perhaps he has heard it is not going to speak favorably of him and that caused this latest fit of his?

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:30:03 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Here you go, Mrs. Red, for all those teasing you


      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thphrase42.gif)

      . :?


      my girlfriend would pretty much agree with this.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:30:13 PM
      I think that they didn't even do an investigation .... pathetic would be better than what they did....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:32:35 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      I got $100 in $1 at the bank for this week and will write "Boycott Aruba Justice for Natalee Holloway" on all of them.  Probably I'll get arrested for defacing currency while the suspects go free courtesy of their friends in high places.

      I just don't know anything more to do or I would do it.  I do think that Joran.Angry!  may be angry because of something related to this program.  Perhaps he has heard it is not going to speak favorably of him and that caused this latest fit of his?

      .

      I thought of that idea the other day... before I went in the grocery store to get some odds n ends.... so I sat in the car and wrote boycott on every single paper currency I had.... and I will do it any time I get cash.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:33:55 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
      Oh San,
       I never even thought of daddy sneaking in at night.  Joran never had to sleep on concrete bed, they probably brought him in a Aero bed!

      They made him as comfortable as possible.  Anita's comment at the court house was "he was supposed to be safe there".


      if she wasn't in that category of big people that lie, she would have said safe and comfortable there....

      Exactly mrs. red.  I wonder if MSNBC has it on tape.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 08:34:25 PM
      Kinda O/T:  
      I'm working on something...Need to know who Julia Renfro was referring to when she was on Dana's Show and "ROGER" called....to back her up and also who Patrick Bosset is.....

      Why is her background so secret?  She moved to Aruba in 1990.

      TIA!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:36:25 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      I got $100 in $1 at the bank for this week and will write "Boycott Aruba Justice for Natalee Holloway" on all of them.  Probably I'll get arrested for defacing currency while the suspects go free courtesy of their friends in high places.

      I just don't know anything more to do or I would do it.  I do think that Joran.Angry!  may be angry because of something related to this program.  Perhaps he has heard it is not going to speak favorably of him and that caused this latest fit of his?

      .

      I thought of that idea the other day... before I went in the grocery store to get some odds n ends.... so I sat in the car and wrote boycott on every single paper currency I had.... and I will do it any time I get cash.


      speaking of grocery stores - most have a bulletin board type area where you can post things you are selling or looking to buy.  Everyone can hang a sign with a picture Natalee and a brief desription of the case and "BOYCOTT ARUBA" on these bulletin boards.   Grocery stores are not the only place and they are free.  

      theres just one idea


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 08:37:30 PM
      .
      Just kidding you back, Blah,   :D

      FLORIDA,
      Roger is a long time participant in this investigation who used to post here and at Riehl World View on this investigation.  He thinks it is normal for females to fall asleep during sex.   :?  Must have happened to him a lot.  He has his own weblog scrux.com which he shut down for a while but think it is back operational.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:38:38 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      .
      Just kidding you back, Blah,   :D

      .


       :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:41:50 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Here you go, Mrs. Red, for all those teasing you


      (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thphrase42.gif)

      . :?


      my girlfriend would pretty much agree with this.


      thanks ANNA!!!


      Title: Re: o/t
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:42:19 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote
      Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject:    

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      YEP.....A very creepy family!

      Kawish was there that Monday after tennis at the casinos



      Hey Florida,
      how do u know that Kawish was at the casinos that Monday after tennis??

      byebye

      Welcome kbm don't run away so fast.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 08:42:48 PM
      Quote from: "blah"


      They thumb thier bullshit at us now but we will have the last laugh.  Enjoy your cornflakes now fatass, your boxes are numbered.


      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/loldog-1.gif)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 08:43:10 PM
      haha okee


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:43:19 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Kinda O/T:  
      I'm working on something...Need to know who Julia Renfro was referring to when she was on Dana's Show and "ROGER" called....to back her up and also who Patrick Bosset is.....

      Why is her background so secret?  She moved to Aruba in 1990.

      TIA!


      I thought she was talking about SCRUX's roger.....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:46:35 PM
      By the way, Paulus's changed statement of picking up waterhead at 11:00pm doesnt work with Jorans statements.  Going by Jorans statements, it would have put paulus picking him up at McDonalds at 10:25pm at the very LATEST.  No way it could have possibly been 11:00pm.

      Dont know if this has been discussed or if there is any interest in discussing it.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:47:16 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      I think that they didn't even do an investigation .... pathetic would be better than what they did....

      mrs. red you are correct once again.

      They were too busy watching Beth, Jug & Dave.  That was the extent of the investigation to make sure they didn't discover anything.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:48:40 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      I got $100 in $1 at the bank for this week and will write "Boycott Aruba Justice for Natalee Holloway" on all of them.  Probably I'll get arrested for defacing currency while the suspects go free courtesy of their friends in high places.

      I just don't know anything more to do or I would do it.  I do think that Joran.Angry!  may be angry because of something related to this program.  Perhaps he has heard it is not going to speak favorably of him and that caused this latest fit of his?

      .

      I thought of that idea the other day... before I went in the grocery store to get some odds n ends.... so I sat in the car and wrote boycott on every single paper currency I had.... and I will do it any time I get cash.

      This is a good idea :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 08:48:52 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      .
      FLORIDA,
      Roger is a long time participant in this investigation who used to post here and at Riehl World View on this investigation.  He thinks it is normal for females to fall asleep during sex.   :?  Must have happened to him a lot.  He has his own weblog scrux.com which he shut down for a while but think it is back operational.
      .

      Wow....I didn't know this...Could he be Julia's friend from Aruba that owns Vacation Villas?

      About Kawish Misier: He is a part of that group & (yes...) Sandra alluded that there were others involved that Monday afternoon...I strongly suspect she was alluding to him.....He & his family seem to be in on the
      secrecy involved.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:50:30 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 08:52:08 PM
      Quote
      About Kawish Misier: He is a part of that group & (yes...) Sandra alluded that there were others involved that Monday afternoon...I strongly suspect she was alluding to him.....He & his family seem to be in on the
      secrecy involved.


      well i dont suspect she was alluding to him


      Title: Re: o/t
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 08:53:31 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote
      Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject:    

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      YEP.....A very creepy family!

      Kawish was there that Monday after tennis at the casinos



      Hey Florida,
      how do u know that Kawish was at the casinos that Monday after tennis??

      byebye

      Welcome kbm don't run away so fast.


      KBM: Why are you so easily to quote me from 10/12 ? Stick around....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 08:53:39 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"


      I thought of that idea the other day... before I went in the grocery store to get some odds n ends.... so I sat in the car and wrote boycott on every single paper currency I had.... and I will do it any time I get cash.


      speaking of grocery stores - most have a bulletin board type area where you can post things you are selling or looking to buy.  Everyone can hang a sign with a picture Natalee and a brief desription of the case and "BOYCOTT ARUBA" on these bulletin boards.   Grocery stores are not the only place and they are free.  

      theres just one idea


      I made up some posters and fliers the other day in jest.  Please excuse the bottom part about asking specific people. They are 8.5" by 8" and can be printed out on card stock or heaview weight paper that just reg paper.  I updated the phones for the USA.  If you have any requests for the bottom I can put it on and send you the flyer to print for yourself.

      Maybe I should write the reward amounts at the bottom.

      Please, this is not harrassment of anyone, just a mock-up for a poster to be distributed across the USA.

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/ASKSANDER72ppi.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 08:54:24 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 08:55:37 PM
      Could be.................


      Title: Re: o/t
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 08:55:45 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote
      Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject:    

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      YEP.....A very creepy family!

      Kawish was there that Monday after tennis at the casinos



      Hey Florida,
      how do u know that Kawish was at the casinos that Monday after tennis??

      byebye

      Welcome kbm don't run away so fast.


      KBM: Why are you so easily to quote me from 10/12 ? Stick around....


      Florida have you noticed the intials KBM?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 08:56:03 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 08:57:04 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view

      You are entitled to your view.  Anything in particular that made you think this besides the statements.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 08:57:20 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"


      I made up some posters and fliers the other day in jest.  Please excuse the bottom part about asking specific people. They are 8.5" by 11" and can be printed out on card stock or heavier weight paper that just regular 20# paper.  I updated the phones for the USA.  If you have any requests for the bottom I can put it on and send you the flyer to print for yourself. Email me thru Klaasend.

      Maybe I should write the reward amounts at the bottom.

      Please, this is not harrassment of anyone, it's just a rough mock-up for a poster that can be distributed. Things do need to be shifted around someand other minor changes made.

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/ASKSANDER72ppi.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 08:58:00 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"


      I thought of that idea the other day... before I went in the grocery store to get some odds n ends.... so I sat in the car and wrote boycott on every single paper currency I had.... and I will do it any time I get cash.


      speaking of grocery stores - most have a bulletin board type area where you can post things you are selling or looking to buy.  Everyone can hang a sign with a picture Natalee and a brief desription of the case and "BOYCOTT ARUBA" on these bulletin boards.   Grocery stores are not the only place and they are free.  

      theres just one idea


      I made up some posters and fliers the other day in jest.  Please excuse the bottom part about asking specific people. They are 8.5" by 8" and can be printed out on card stock or heaview weight paper that just reg paper.  I updated the phones for the USA.  If you have any requests for the bottom I can put it on and send you the flyer to print for yourself.

      Maybe I should write the reward amounts at the bottom.

      Please, this is not harrassment of anyone, just a mock-up for a poster to be distributed across the USA.

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/ASKSANDER72ppi.jpg)



      this is great, do you mind if I modify it a little bit and use it at our grocery, hardware, auto parts stores, etc ????


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 08:59:07 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:00:31 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      How long should parents wait to look for a missing daughter in another country?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 24, 2006, 09:00:41 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Kinda O/T:  
      I'm working on something...Need to know who Julia Renfro was referring to when she was on Dana's Show and "ROGER" called....to back her up and also who Patrick Bosset is.....

      Why is her background so secret?  She moved to Aruba in 1990.

      TIA!


      Found this from Leslie.  She may remember more.

      Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 1:01 am    Post subject:    

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      Kermit hints that the man Julia Renfro is involved with is Patrick Boset.
      I found this:
      Patrick Boset has been involved with La Cage Folie restaurant since December. The famous main street retailer, he owns Mango, became a restaurateur by default. When "The 3 Little Birds" folded, Chef Marc Vullinghs has naturally become unemployed. Patrick couldn't see his favorite cook out of the kitchen and reopened the restaurant, with the chef as his partner. The third leg of this interesting combo is Michael v/d Berg, perhaps Aruba's top wine expert. Michael is responsible for an amazing wine list, we counted six pages, with exquisite varieties from around the globe. Marc and very cute wife Angela now rule the rooftop veranda restaurant at the heart of town.

       
      Back to top  

      http://tinyurl.com/ylb6l4


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:01:43 PM
      but uhm florida still didnt awsered me on my first question.
      maybe he/she is busy. but when you read can u plz awnser


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:03:32 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      How long should parents wait to look for a missing daughter in another country?


      well fast...but to be in another counrty so fast and already have printed thousands of "proffesional" flyers???


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:03:54 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      you don't know my mom then... I think it's what any mom does especially when their child is in another country...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 09:04:07 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      I just wonder if the Dutch investigators and de Vries have all the newspaper articles that we have read.  Just reading the local Aruban news reports would give them many leads to follow and "suspicious unnamed substances" to uncover and identify.  Now, this is all public record, so I would have to think these people are bright enough to access the local media regarding the investigation, wouldn't you?


      What evidence or items were found where?

      Lighthouse/California sand dunes/Arashi Beach -
      belt (8-12-05)
      bits of plastic (8-12-05)
      aru-bay rocks (6-10-05)
      bone with flesh - said to be a donkey bone

      Marriott/Fisherman's Huts
      panties (6-14-05)
      condoms (6-14-05)
      bikini strap (6-14-05)
      bone with flesh on it (7-6-05)

      Colony
      sunglasses (6-6-06)
      VCB shirt (6-6-06)
      spray bottle with suspicious substance (6-6-06)
      foam with bite marks (6-6-06)
      mattress with dog blood (6-5-06)

      Boca Tortuga area of Arikok Park
      duct tape with blonde hairs (7-17-05
      fabric matching Natalee's top(7-17-05)
      Shallow Grave (7-12-05)

      CarlosNCharlie's
      International Diamonds security tape (5-30-05)


      Add to that list the videotape of Paulus, Joran, and the MB girls at the Blackjack table on Sunday night in the casino.  There's more videotape than we saw, and I'll betcha the rest shows Paulus, plain as day.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:04:10 PM
      Of all those creepy guys....I always thoght Kawish was the cutest.
      He seems to have more class than the others....I think Joran is ICK!  :?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:04:14 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty

      kbm, Beth was lucky to get there so fast.  I believe it was a friends fathers private jet that allowed her to get there so fast.  She was lucky.  Natalee's dad wasn't as lucky.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 24, 2006, 09:04:24 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      It was actually about 12 hrs. after they were notified.  And wasn't the whole arrival a BIG surprise....hardly any time to get all those ducks covered.  Not everyone operates on island time..


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:06:17 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      I find it impossible to find anything that could possibly justify all of the lies and actions of not only the suspects, but many people close to them.

      You are entitled to your opinion but I sure hope that you take a closer look at the statements.  Put yourself in their shoes and ask yourself what would you do if you were in that situation.

      Just one quick example - would you hire lawyers right off the bat for the purpose of fighting the FBI's involvement in the case?  Think about it, the FBI is probably the BEST chance you have of proving your innocense but you are fightin to keep them out of it?  I can surley understand a guilty person doing that.

      Anyhow - theres only thousands of other situations in this case, like this, that do not point to innocent people.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:06:42 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      but uhm florida still didnt awsered me on my first question.
      maybe he/she is busy. but when you read can u plz awnser


      Sorry, which question?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:07:03 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Of all those creepy guys....I always thoght Kawish was the cutest.
      He seems to have more class than the others....I think Joran is ICK!  :?


      Who the heck is Kawish and what the heck does he have to do with the case?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:08:55 PM
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      It was actually about 12 hrs. after they were notified.  And wasn't the whole arrival a BIG surprise....hardly any time to get all those ducks covered.  Not everyone operates on island time..


      oh sorry 12hrs then. (and yeh beth was really lucky)
      but also wasnt natalee dissapeared in another country also...i think maybe in jamaica or on a boat or something, a couple of years earlier?>??


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:09:40 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      It was actually about 12 hrs. after they were notified.  And wasn't the whole arrival a BIG surprise....hardly any time to get all those ducks covered.  Not everyone operates on island time..


      oh sorry 12hrs then. (and yeh beth was really lucky)
      but also wasnt natalee dissapeared in another country also...i think maybe in jamaica or on a boat or something, a couple of years earlier?>??


      Ah, that's a proven false rumor.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:10:01 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      How long should parents wait to look for a missing daughter in another country?


      well fast...but to be in another counrty so fast and already have printed thousands of "proffesional" flyers???

      kbm, if you think your daughter has been kidnapped you can have those flyers made up pretty fast at a printing place.  That is not unusual to me.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 24, 2006, 09:10:22 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Of all those creepy guys....I always thoght Kawish was the cutest.
      He seems to have more class than the others....I think Joran is ICK!  :?


      Who the heck is Kawish and what the heck does he have to do with the case?


      Kawish is the guy with the heavy dragon? necklace in one of the pics we've seen IIRC.  He is also listed as one of the "character" witnesses for Joran.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:11:12 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      but uhm florida still didnt awsered me on my first question.
      maybe he/she is busy. but when you read can u plz awnser


      Sorry, which question?


      see page 38;)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:11:30 PM
      Exactly...HIs family owns the VIP Club.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:11:56 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      you need to check your facts if you believe it was only 4 hours later, but anyhow, if my daughter went missing in Aruba, you can bet the farm I would do everything in my power to get there as quickly as possible.  NOTHING would get in my way.  I really dont understand how this logic = innocent J2K's


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:13:09 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      It was actually about 12 hrs. after they were notified.  And wasn't the whole arrival a BIG surprise....hardly any time to get all those ducks covered.  Not everyone operates on island time..


      oh sorry 12hrs then. (and yeh beth was really lucky)
      but also wasnt natalee dissapeared in another country also...i think maybe in jamaica or on a boat or something, a couple of years earlier?>??

      kbm, that was a rumor.  Natalee never disappeared in another country.  Beth her mother confirmed this.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:13:10 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Exactly...HIs family owns the VIP Club.


      Oh boy, big bucks eh.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:13:44 PM
      DOMINO THEORY

      If one goes down; they ALL go down.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:14:16 PM
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: NM on October 24, 2006, 09:14:21 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Buckeye"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      It was actually about 12 hrs. after they were notified.  And wasn't the whole arrival a BIG surprise....hardly any time to get all those ducks covered.  Not everyone operates on island time..


      oh sorry 12hrs then. (and yeh beth was really lucky)
      but also wasnt natalee dissapeared in another country also...i think maybe in jamaica or on a boat or something, a couple of years earlier?>??

      Hey kbm,
      That was a rumor spread on the island.  Her parents and I believe her aunt or uncle were asked this and claimed she never ran away before.

      Hey Monkeys!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:14:45 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      DOMINO THEORY

      If one goes down; they ALL go down.


      Looks like they've been going down for a year and half now.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Mere on October 24, 2006, 09:14:49 PM
      Hi kbm.....are you by any chance Kawish or are you perhaps on Aruba or in the Netherlands...?  

      We want to welcome you to Scared Monkeys....but also want you to know that this is a pretty up-front group....we are here for Natalee and her family and friends.....

       :)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:14:51 PM
      Quote from: kbm
      Quote from: Buckeye
      Quote from: kbm
      Quote from: mrs. red
      Quote from: kbm
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee



      oh sorry 12hrs then. (and yeh beth was really lucky)
      but also wasnt natalee dissapeared in another country also...i think maybe in jamaica or on a boat or something, a couple of years earlier?>??


      KBM - that was a lie started by big people... sorry no dice. Natalee was a straight A student she wouldn't have been able to do all she did including keep up her studies if she ran away on a regular basis... :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:15:14 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Exactly...HIs family owns the VIP Club.


      Oh boy, big bucks eh.


      Yeah....Where Dave met the Buddhist, pshyic, healer...
      at the Lion'd Den


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:15:39 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      you need to check your facts if you believe it was only 4 hours later, but anyhow, if my daughter went missing in Aruba, you can bet the farm I would do everything in my power to get there as quickly as possible.  NOTHING would get in my way.  I really dont understand how this logic = innocent J2K's

      yeh thats true


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:16:21 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      Not even by a 'genious off the charts' like JVDS?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:16:39 PM
      Solve it now...or Going Down.......


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:16:50 PM
      Quote from: "MeMere"
      Hi kbm.....are you by any chance Kawish or are you perhaps on Aruba or in the Netherlands...?  

      We want to welcome you to Scared Monkeys....but also want you to know that this is a pretty up-front group....we are here for Natalee and her family and friends.....

       :)


      thank you for saying this so well MeMere, I have been in a take no prisioners kind of mood all day..... so I might not sound as nice as I really am... LOL


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:17:32 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      [
      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty


      when it was published????

      Beth found out Natalee didnt make her plane at something like 8:00 in the morning and she didnt get to Aruba until around 11:00pm so I dont know where you get 4 hours.

      But anyhow, you can bet the farm that if my daughter went missing in Aruba I would be there as fast as humanly possible.  You can also bet that I would have posters made, and searches planed immediatley after the response given by the law enforcement when they not only reported the situation, but handed the last known (until this day) people to be seen with Natalee


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:18:35 PM
      Joran????  A genius off the charts????  LOL


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:19:01 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Joran????  A genius off the charts????  LOL


      Just quoting a CC statement.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:20:20 PM
      He is so ICK to me...

      THe Suriname guys are CUTE!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 24, 2006, 09:21:10 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Joran????  A genius off the charts????  LOL


      Just quoting a CC statement.


      Was that before or after he looked into his eyes??? :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:21:29 PM
      kbm, what do you think happened to Natalee?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:21:44 PM
      well i also want this case solved just like you.

      but florida you still didnt awnsered me on the question:p

      (sorry my english is not that good)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: NM on October 24, 2006, 09:21:54 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)

      It is hard to believe unless you read Dave's book, and material here, or spent the last 17 months here.
      1st the fbi was not allowed to interrogate, nor search. They were only allowed to observe some of the interrogations.
      The ALE put out a lot of decoys to distract the US searchers and media, and family.
      The cell phones of the family were monitored and many friends of j2k called in fake tips to force the family to go in incorrect directions.
      There was and is a reporter in aruba that also lead the family astray w/ false leads. And this person is also repsonsible for many rumors on the island to make Natalee and her family look bad.
      There were way more people involved than just j2k.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:22:46 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i also want this case solved just like you.

      but florida you still didnt awnsered me on the question:p

      (sorry my english is not that good)


      Again, which question?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:23:36 PM
      About Monday at the casinos?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 09:23:40 PM
      .
      KBM,
      You are aware that the suspect's sttorneys blocked the FBI from even getting the information after the fact. They were never allowed to participate at all.  Sent divers right away and they never set foot in thw water, returned to States unused.

      ALE would let them watch through a glass but not ask one question, etc.  It was in September and the suspects still have the files blocked from FBI.  They have NEVER been allowed to participate.

      Sadly.  I have to wonder why not because every other country in the world welcomes their help.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:23:47 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      kbm, what do you think happened to Natalee?


      well i always look at things from differant views, and allot of people dont.
      it could be that somebody from the usa did it. i dont know


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:24:06 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i also want this case solved just like you.

      but florida you still didnt awnsered me on the question:p

      (sorry my english is not that good)


      Again, which question?


      The one about Kawish at tennis club with JVDS.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:24:07 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      kbm, it sounds like you have gotten some bad information.  You might want to take a look that the thread that has all of the witness/suspects statements on it.  I think things will become alot more clear once you start comparing the statements to each other. The suspects and witnesses directly contradict each other on so many points its difficult to keep track of all of the inconsistencies.  You do not have to take my word for it, read for yourself, you will see!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 24, 2006, 09:24:14 PM
      kbm

      There aren't too many out there theories or planted rumors that we haven't researched.  Feel free to bring things up and we will give you our opinion.  If you are from Aruba, update us on the latest thinking.  The old stuff is kinda old.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:24:47 PM
      I agree...it could have been anyone.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:25:15 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      About Monday at the casinos?

      yes


      Title: Re: o/t
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 09:26:25 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote
      Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject:    

      --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      YEP.....A very creepy family!

      Kawish was there that Monday after tennis at the casinos



      Hey Florida,
      how do u know that Kawish was at the casinos that Monday after tennis??

      byebye



      Here you go, Florida.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:27:43 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      He is so ICK to me...

      THe Suriname guys are CUTE!


      so do you and kbm know them?  aren't you afraid of them?  I would be... even if I had known them before... I mean jvds did say himself that they did this 20 x before......


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:28:23 PM
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:28:51 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      kbm, it sounds like you have gotten some bad information.  You might want to take a look that the thread that has all of the witness/suspects statements on it.  I think things will become alot more clear once you start comparing the statements to each other. The suspects and witnesses directly contradict each other on so many points its difficult to keep track of all of the inconsistencies.  You do not have to take my word for it, read for yourself, you will see!!

      yeh thats true....but like i said the suspects  also didnt know what was happening.



      and this is just one dissapearance in aruba (unsolved), but in usa there are also allot of unsolved crimes and you dont hear anything about it


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:29:58 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      kbm, it sounds like you have gotten some bad information.  You might want to take a look that the thread that has all of the witness/suspects statements on it.  I think things will become alot more clear once you start comparing the statements to each other. The suspects and witnesses directly contradict each other on so many points its difficult to keep track of all of the inconsistencies.  You do not have to take my word for it, read for yourself, you will see!!

      yeh thats true....but like i said the suspects  also didnt know what was happening.



      and this is just one dissapearance in aruba (unsolved), but in usa there are also allot of unsolved crimes and you dont hear anything about it


      Heh, heh, yeah, but aruba disappeared the wrong person.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:30:38 PM
      Quote from: Florida
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down![/[/b]quote]

      well that is true.... and it's going to keep going down unless you get Kawish to talk and tell the truth.... and I don't mean any garbage that Natalee ran away to another island... we all know damn good and well that it isn't true... Aruba has already sent a mouth piece with that information.....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 09:31:07 PM
      .
      KBM,
      Here is a link to the statements we have collected so far from the suspects.  You might want to read them as you have time and compare one version with another.  It is VERY telling.

      http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewforum.php?f=6


      Also someone from the US could have done something but the three suspects are known and admit to being the last seen with Natalee.  It would only make sense to do something to her here in a country of 300 million rather than on a tiny island.  Much easier to cover, etc. here and they would not know how to dispose of a body either.

      No, this was someone who knew how to make her disappear but good and that would require more information that the MB students could have gleaned in three days.

      .In my opinion, anyway.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 09:31:11 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty
      [/b]
      It was less than 24 hours. What is your point ? They had the transporation ready. Why not go ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:31:16 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:31:22 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      He is so ICK to me...

      THe Suriname guys are CUTE!


      so do you and kbm know them?  aren't you afraid of them?  I would be... even if I had known them before... I mean jvds did say himself that they did this 20 x before......


      I think Joran is soooo UGLY!
      THe Suriname guys don't seem UGLY/evil to me....

      20x before may mean just kissing & stuff.....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:31:39 PM
      KBM... I beg to differ... there is an entire section on this very blog dedciated to others that are missing...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:31:46 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....


      well they could be guilty. but when it was "published" that natalee dissapeared her mother was in aruba 4hours later...normally people are not so fast in another counrty
      [/b]
      It was less than 24 hours. What is your point ? They had the transporation ready. Why not go ?


      okee


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:32:11 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      You missed all the excitement........


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:32:20 PM
      Evening Monkeys, I see we have a newbie here tonight....welcome to our world.   :)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:32:43 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      He is so ICK to me...

      THe Suriname guys are CUTE!


      so do you and kbm know them?  aren't you afraid of them?  I would be... even if I had known them before... I mean jvds did say himself that they did this 20 x before......


      I think Joran is soooo UGLY!
      THe Suriname guys don't seem UGLY/evil to me....

      20x before may mean just kissing & stuff.....



      So do you and KBM know each other?  Do you know them?  I am just wondering...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 09:33:07 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      kbm, it sounds like you have gotten some bad information.  You might want to take a look that the thread that has all of the witness/suspects statements on it.  I think things will become alot more clear once you start comparing the statements to each other. The suspects and witnesses directly contradict each other on so many points its difficult to keep track of all of the inconsistencies.  You do not have to take my word for it, read for yourself, you will see!!

      yeh thats true....but like i said the suspects  also didnt know what was happening.
      Share with us.



      and this is just one dissapearance in aruba (unsolved), but in usa there are also allot of unsolved crimes and you dont hear anything about it

      You hear alot.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:33:38 PM
      Hiram saw Natalee from his window....

      Into his neighbor's house.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:33:48 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      Guess that means the rumor that Kawish was at the casino that monday is wrong?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on October 24, 2006, 09:35:13 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "blah"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know al the details...yall know more than me.
      but i think its very difficult for 3young men to do such a crime, and dont get caught. and there are so much investigation from usa and holland.
      (thats almost impossible)


      kbm, it sounds like you have gotten some bad information.  You might want to take a look that the thread that has all of the witness/suspects statements on it.  I think things will become alot more clear once you start comparing the statements to each other. The suspects and witnesses directly contradict each other on so many points its difficult to keep track of all of the inconsistencies.  You do not have to take my word for it, read for yourself, you will see!!

      yeh thats true....but like i said the suspects  also didnt know what was happening.



      and this is just one dissapearance in aruba (unsolved), but in usa there are also allot of unsolved crimes and you dont hear anything about it


      The suspects may have been told to hang tight and it would blow over.  Their advisor was wrong.  If their friend lied to them, it is time to come clean.
      If there was reason to believe an unsolved crime in the US was unsolved due to incompetence or refusal to use resources or lack of evidence protection or croneism...believe me..you'd hear plenty..


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:35:16 PM
      KBM
      Hi there!  What do you think happened to Natalee?  Could it have been as simple as some think?  Just and overdose and J2K were unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time? TIA


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:36:09 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"



      and this is just one dissapearance in aruba (unsolved), but in usa there are also allot of unsolved crimes and you dont hear anything about it


      If you dont hear anything about it, just read this website more often.  This website (scaredmonkeys.com) covers many MANY missing persons cases.

      Also, the thing that has really gotten the attention in America with the Natalee Holloway case isnt so much that it is a case of a missing girl, but it is more about how Aruba handled the case after she went missing.  There was a very mishandled investigation, the victim and family were ridiculed and threatened, searchers were drug through the mud and so on.

      If it was simply a case of a girl who went missing and the authorities did everything in their power to locate her, and asked for help and resources from the USA and treated the victim and family with class - it wouldnt have been made such a big deal.  We understand that people go missing everywhere all the time.  We just ask for an honest effort in finding that person.  Is that asking too much?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:36:19 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hiram saw Natalee from his window....

      Into his neighbor's house.


      Well, I must be slipping...I don't understand this statement at all. Please explain.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:36:58 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      Guess that means the rumor that Kawish was at the casino that monday is wrong?


      kawish wasnt in aruba in that time period;)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:37:24 PM
      kbm, do you know any of the suspects?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 09:37:32 PM
      We did hear that Beth was not acting like the mother of a missing girl.
      I don't know what one would act like !
      I think that you would go to where she was last seen as fast as you could. Gather up all the info that you could. Look for her.
      Usually the police do the looking, but in this case, no.
      They wanted to wait. For what I don't know.
      But, KBM, what do you think of all of this ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 09:37:42 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      [
      and this is just one dissapearance in aruba (unsolved), but in usa there are also allot of unsolved crimes and you dont hear anything about it


      Not as many as some like to claim.  You see, we count it when one parent who does not have legal custody takes a child and most do not if it is a parent involved.  Only about 150 a year remain unsolved out of as I said earlier our just reached 300 million plus another 8 to 11 million illegals.

      The big difference for me is that in this country they are really trying to solve the disappearance and bring justice and in Aruba they ignore the facts and evidence and seem to refuse to do that.  No forensic evidence collected from those last seen with a person who disappeared is just unheard of these days.  They collect finger nails and fiber and everything.  And always search the property of those last seen with someone.  I have never seen an investigation conducted to refuse to find evidence before.

      That is what upsets me about this.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:37:47 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hiram saw Natalee from his window....

      Into his neighbor's house.


      Well, I must be slipping...I don't understand this statement at all. Please explain.


      That's because Shango didn't mention it.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 09:37:50 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hiram saw Natalee from his window....

      Into his neighbor's house.


      Who is Hiram's neighbor?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:38:18 PM
      If Hiram saw Natalee after the beach....

      She must have been alive.......


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:38:22 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      He is so ICK to me...

      THe Suriname guys are CUTE!


      so do you and kbm know them?  aren't you afraid of them?  I would be... even if I had known them before... I mean jvds did say himself that they did this 20 x before......


      I think Joran is soooo UGLY!
      THe Suriname guys don't seem UGLY/evil to me....

      20x before may mean just kissing & stuff.....



      So do you and KBM know each other?  Do you know them?  I am just wondering...


      do i know who??:s


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:38:25 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      Guess that means the rumor that Kawish was at the casino that monday is wrong?


      kawish wasnt in aruba in that time period;)

      Do you know where he was at the time.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:39:42 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      Guess that means the rumor that Kawish was at the casino that monday is wrong?


      kawish wasnt in aruba in that time period;)

      Do you know where he was at the time.


      yeh studying in holland, having nothing to do with the case


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:39:47 PM
      I don't think Kawish is involved....

      Too CUTE to be.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 09:40:00 PM
      Florida, who is Hiram's neighbor?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:41:16 PM
      Either Michael Posner or Louis Posner........


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:42:02 PM
      Hiram is between them.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 09:42:02 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Either Michael Posner or Louis Posner........
       Where is his house?  I'll bet its a big house, huh?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:42:14 PM
      Wasn't Kawish on Joran's character witness list?  I wonder if he knows Joran well or if he even knew they listed him as a witness.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:42:34 PM
      Tierra del Sol


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:42:38 PM
      Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
      We did hear that Beth was not acting like the mother of a missing girl.
      I don't know what one would act like !
      I think that you would go to where she was last seen as fast as you could. Gather up all the info that you could. Look for her.
      Usually the police do the looking, but in this case, no.
      They wanted to wait. For what I don't know.
      But, KBM, what do you think of all of this ?

      well i think that you dont have to boycott aruba immediatly.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 09:43:22 PM
      Florida, did Hiram tell the polis he saw her there?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:43:28 PM
      KBM:  Who is Santos?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:43:41 PM
      Kawish never seemed like someone that would get involved in this mess anyway.  I never heard anything bad about him at all.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:44:17 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Florida, did Hiram tell the polis he saw her there?


      No.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:45:45 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Florida, did Hiram tell the polis he saw her there?


      No.


      Was SHE being carried or her BODY being carried?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:45:48 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      If Hiram saw Natalee after the beach....

      She must have been alive.......


      and what day and time would this have been?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:46:19 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Who is Santos?

      uhm there is 2guys with the lastname "santos"
      and there is a guy with the first name santos...and he is a cousin  of kawish

      and why did somebody say that "kawish and santos look like terrorists"hehe it has nothing to do with the case


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 09:46:49 PM
      OK, here's a better version:

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Rewardsposter.jpg)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:47:05 PM
      The Misier Family is a very wealthy, successful family from Suriname living in Aruba and would have no part of this awfull situation with Natalee.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:48:05 PM
      Quote from: "SunFreak2"
      OK, here's a better version:

      (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Rewardsposter.jpg)


      Great! But ya might want to check on how to spell info?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:48:24 PM
      THe cousin is the DJ?  Where does he work? (cute!)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 09:48:28 PM
      I just looked at who lives next door to Isreal Posner. No Hiram listed.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:48:37 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Kawish never seemed like someone that would get involved in this mess anyway.  I never heard anything bad about him at all.


      yeh i agree.
      but on this forum people said then when they saw a picture of kawish evil is what stroked them:P


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:48:46 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      The Misier Family is a very wealthy, successful family from Suriname living in Aruba and would have no part of this awfull situation with Natalee.


      KBM... I meant do you know FLorida?  Do you know the suspects?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:49:02 PM
      Israel lives in Malmok.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:49:35 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      If Hiram saw Natalee after the beach....

      She must have been alive.......


      So they did go to beach?  I wonder if that means that the Kalpoes really did leave her and Joran there?  I wonder which beach?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:50:21 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      THe cousin is the DJ?  Where does he work? (cute!)

      what dj:s
      well he's not a dj


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:50:26 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Kawish never seemed like someone that would get involved in this mess anyway.  I never heard anything bad about him at all.


      yeh i agree.
      but on this forum people said then when they saw a picture of kawish evil is what stroked them:P


      Ahhh, don't take it personally. Just some folks going off the deep end.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:50:29 PM
      I like the pic of Kawish with the "striped head"


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 09:50:33 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Who is Santos?

      uhm there is 2guys with the lastname "santos"
      and there is a guy with the first name santos...and he is a cousin  of kawish

      and why did somebody say that "kawish and santos look like terrorists"hehe it has nothing to do with the case


      Kawish has those unusual, intense, burning eyes.  I think this might be why someone might say he looked sort of frightening.  Don't you think his eyes are very intense??  Sort of scary?  I understand that this is supposed to be a hot look for models these days, however, and that I am just not up on the latest.

      I do not think a wealthy boy from a good family would be involved, however.  Why should he?  And he seems more serious and likely a far better student that the rest of that group like Joran Satish, Steve Croes.  I would think Kawish much more intelligent even if his eyes are intense.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: San on October 24, 2006, 09:51:18 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      From what I understand they saw his car & him with Joran at the Radisson that Monday afternoon.....If Kawish would talk he would be such a hero!

      This needs to be solved once & for all...Aruba cannot afford $$$ to lose anymore.

      ONE PERSON is bringing the whole island down!


      well in that time period i wasnt in aruba.


      Guess that means the rumor that Kawish was at the casino that monday is wrong?


      kawish wasnt in aruba in that time period;)

      Do you know where he was at the time.


      yeh studying in holland, having nothing to do with the case

      The first time I heard his name was when he was put as character witness for Joran.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:51:19 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      The Misier Family is a very wealthy, successful family from Suriname living in Aruba and would have no part of this awfull situation with Natalee.


      That is good to hear.  I guess that clears up a lot for me.  I have been wondering. Thanks.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:51:25 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      THe cousin is the DJ?  Where does he work? (cute!)

      what dj:s
      well he's not a dj


      OK...so what does the cousin do?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 09:51:30 PM
      He has an intensity about him. And the picture of him posing with his shirt half on / half off is odd.
      So if Kawish wasn't in Aruba and KBM wasn't in Aruba, then anything you know is like gossip heard.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 09:52:35 PM
      Florida, how many people know that Hiram saw Natalee at one of the Posner's homes?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:53:02 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Who is Santos?

      uhm there is 2guys with the lastname "santos"
      and there is a guy with the first name santos...and he is a cousin  of kawish

      and why did somebody say that "kawish and santos look like terrorists"hehe it has nothing to do with the case


      Kawish has those unusual, intense, burning eyes.  I think this might be why someone might say he looked sort of frightening.  Don't you think his eyes are very intense??  Sort of scary?  I understand that this is supposed to be a hot look for models these days, however, and that I am just not up on the latest.

      I do not think a wealthy boy from a good family would be involved, however.  Why should he?  And he seems more serious and likely a far better student that the rest of that group like Joran Satish, Steve Croes.  I would think Kawish much more intelligent even if his eyes are intense.

      .

      thank you for youre view


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:54:18 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Kawish never seemed like someone that would get involved in this mess anyway.  I never heard anything bad about him at all.


      yeh i agree.
      but on this forum people said then when they saw a picture of kawish evil is what stroked them:P


      We never have anyone to tell us about these people, so sometimes we just go with our initial reactions and often they are suspicous at best.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:55:01 PM
      why was Hiram looking in Posner's window at 3:00am?  Doesnt make sense


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:55:24 PM
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:55:29 PM
      Quote from: "blah"
      why was Hiram looking in Posner's window at 3:00am?  Doesnt make sense

      who's hiram?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:55:54 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?
      NoOo


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 09:57:05 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?
      NoOo


      Is Kawish a model?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 09:57:06 PM
      unfortunately because of what happened... this forum pretty much equates aruba to evil.... and it's unfortunate because we all know intellectually it isn't true, but the emotional part of us doesn't agree.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 09:57:09 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "blah"
      why was Hiram looking in Posner's window at 3:00am?  Doesnt make sense

      who's hiram?


      Yeah, who's Hiram?  :shock:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 09:57:40 PM
      Then what?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 09:57:53 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "blah"
      why was Hiram looking in Posner's window at 3:00am?  Doesnt make sense

      who's hiram?


      i dont know, Florida said Hiram saw Natalee in Posners house the night she went missing and I dont belive it


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 09:58:22 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?
      NoOo


      Is Kawish a model?


      what does that have to do with the case :?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 09:58:41 PM
      So Did Hiram Help Dispose of Natalee's Body ...

      ...since he saw her "after" the beach.

      Must've been dead.

      Poor Hiram.

      BTW, who's Hiram?

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 09:59:09 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?
      NoOo


      Is Kawish a model?


      what does that have to do with the case :?


      Means he might be a celebrity to some folks here.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 10:00:13 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?
      NoOo


      Is Kawish a model?


      what does that have to do with the case :?


      Absolutely nothing.  I am just a nosey person.   :oops: He is rather striking looking and something about him seems like a model to me.  Sorry.   :?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Frijole on October 24, 2006, 10:00:38 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      So Did Hiram Help Dispose of Natalee's Body ...

      ...since he saw her "after" the beach.

      Must've been dead.

      Poor Hiram.

      BTW, who's Hiram?

      .
      :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

      Thanks.  Lost here!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:00:41 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      So Did Hiram Help Dispose of Natalee's Body ...

      ...since he saw her "after" the beach.

      Must've been dead.

      Poor Hiram.

      BTW, who's Hiram?

      .

      Florida says he has the misfortune to live between two homes owned by Michael Posner and Israel Posner.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 10:01:38 PM
      Quote from: "mrs. red"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      haha okee

      Welcome back.  Tell us your thoughts on the case.

      uhm i dont have allot of time now
      but i think that maybe the suspects are not guilty.
      and maybe in the beginning they made false statements because they didnt knew what was happining. but thats my view


      you will have to explain why you don't think so... I am curious...because I totally believe those three are guilty....



      INTIAL LIES

      MORE LIES

      MORE STORIES

      MORE LIES

      MORE LIES

      add some more LIES


      umm,,,, yep

      GUILTY as HELL


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:01:39 PM
      KBM:  Natalee did not "fall" on the beach?

      She was taken to someone's house?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:01:48 PM
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 10:02:26 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      So Did Hiram Help Dispose of Natalee's Body ...

      ...since he saw her "after" the beach.

      Must've been dead.

      Poor Hiram.

      BTW, who's Hiram?

      .

      Florida says he has the misfortune to live between two homes owned by Michael Posner and Israel Posner.


      Florida is here jerking peoples chains, Florida doesnt knwo anything


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:03:08 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Florida, how many people know that Hiram saw Natalee at one of the Posner's homes?


      Very few....Me, someone & ROY.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 10:03:12 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands




      please, lets not go down that IDIOTIC road

       8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:03:32 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands


      kbm, that theory is a lot less likely than many other theories.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 10:04:13 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands


      KBM... read the witness statements and tell us why all the endless lies if Natalee's parents kidnapped her....

      IS the garbage that they tell y'alll down there?   If this was you and your mom came to the states would you want us to lie about her?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 10:04:48 PM
      see, there are LEGITIMATE theories and then there are KOOKIE theories


      the theory that Natalee was kidnapped by her own family falls under the

      KOOKIE theory  :lol:  8)  8)  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:04:53 PM
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:04:58 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Florida, how many people know that Hiram saw Natalee at one of the Posner's homes?


      Very few....Me, someone & ROY.


      That's about three too many for Hiram to feel very safe, if you know what I mean.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 10:05:03 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i also want this case solved just like you.

      but florida you still didnt awnsered me on the question:p

      (sorry my english is not that good)


      SandraK?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 10:05:18 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands


      but did you know that if a person goes missing in the US, if there is no body found that the insurance company doesnt have to pay?  Some companies do pay after something like 10 years if no body has turned up.  So if it was for insurance money, dont you think they would have made it so a body would be found?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:05:47 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands


      I want you to explain about this insurance money thing, please.  I know this is not true, I have that from a good source.  Why do you think that?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:06:14 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      see, there are LEGITIMATE theories and then there are KOOKIE theories


      the theory that Natalee was kidnapped by her own family falls under the

      KOOKIE theory  :lol:  8)  8)  8)


      I thought it was a little farther out than KOOKIE.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:06:30 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      Florida, you might prove you know what you are talking about by going to the Dutch investigators and telling them what you know.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:06:30 PM
      Florida says he has the misfortune to live between two homes owned by Michael Posner and Israel Posner.

      Hiram...not Kawish!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 10:06:47 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Anna"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Is Santos a DJ?
      NoOo


      Is Kawish a model?


      what does that have to do with the case :?


      Absolutely nothing.  I am just a nosey person.   :oops: He is rather striking looking and something about him seems like a model to me.  Sorry.   :?


      He looks more like a model than Guido who is chubby.  Guido wants to be a model but he doesn't look so good.  Kawish I could see as one.  He has the looks that Guido doesn't.  But then Kawish may not want to be a model but something about him in the blue shirt photo just looks like one to me.  Do you know if he knows anything at all about Natalee?

      We did not know about him at all until he appeared on Joran's attorney's list of character witnesses for Joran which means he must know Joran really well to vouch for him like that.  

      .

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: NM on October 24, 2006, 10:07:00 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands


      Insurance companies, at least in the US, do not pay benefits if there is no body or proof of death.  This is another popular rumor on aruba, and not just for Natalee, but for Max devries, and Bud Larson.

      Also the $$ from the book her dad wrote goes to help find missing people, and the book would have been writen w/ or w/out him.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 10:07:07 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      how could kbm POSSIBLY prove that you know anything?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:07:09 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Florida, how many people know that Hiram saw Natalee at one of the Posner's homes?


      Very few....Me, someone & ROY.


      Was there a party at this home? Who is Hiram again? I am lost, sorry. :roll:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:07:11 PM
      Quote from: "robots"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands




      please, lets not go down that IDIOTIC road

       8)


      why is it idiotic
      everything is possible
      and you have to look everything from different views


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 10:07:55 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands

      But, these stories all originate from Aruba.
      Did you read the book ?
      This isn't about a family doing something to their loved girl to get money.
      And, BTW, where is the money ?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 10:08:04 PM
      TYRO

      These clowns don't know what they're talking about.

      Insurance money?  Beth in Aruba in 4 hours?

      Phew.

      Next...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:08:56 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      uhm what are you talking about that i can prove?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:09:13 PM
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      Florida, you might prove you know what you are talking about by going to the Dutch investigators and telling them what you know.


      I HAVE!


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:09:16 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "robots"
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands




      please, lets not go down that IDIOTIC road

       8)


      why is it idiotic
      everything is possible
      and you have to look everything from different views


      Yeah, we know, I'm holding out for the space alien abduction theory.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:10:06 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Quote from: "AZLady"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      Florida, you might prove you know what you are talking about by going to the Dutch investigators and telling them what you know.


      I HAVE!


      Excellent.  Perhaps they will sort this whole thing out.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Red on October 24, 2006, 10:10:47 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      Quote from: "Florida"
      Hey KBM!  Prove to them that I know what I'm talking about! Please!!!!!


      uhm what are you talking about that i can prove?


      Hello, KBM, welcome aboard ... sorry about the delay in the sign up ... but have been severely under the weather.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:10:51 PM
      Florida, does Michael Posner still live on the island?  in the same house?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 10:10:54 PM
      Hey , do you know that ppl in Aruba are being contacted by the producers of the Peter DeVries show. ?
      That there are more questions going to be asked ?
      The Kalpoes are in the sights, so is Joran.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: justinsmama on October 24, 2006, 10:11:31 PM
      Who in hades are Hiram and Something-or-other-ISH?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:11:37 PM
      Okay, everyone...I have a question for Florida.  Please tell me who you think is responsible for disapppearing Natalee if it isn't one of the 3 suspects?  I really want to know what you think.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: blah on October 24, 2006, 10:11:58 PM
      Quote from: "the big hammer"
      TYRO

      These clowns don't know what they're talking about.

      Insurance money?  Beth in Aruba in 4 hours?

      Phew.

      Next...


      If people in Aruba really believe this nonsense, no wonder they all fall for the cover-up.   Unreal.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: mrs. red on October 24, 2006, 10:12:38 PM
      Good night y'all....

       keep the faith...


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:13:00 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Okay, everyone...I have a question for Florida.  Please tell me who you think is responsible for disapppearing Natalee if it isn't one of the 3 suspects?  I really want to know what you think.


      Hey, Hiram saw Nat's body in Posners place after the murder at the sloot dump.

      Guess Posner knows more about body disposal than PVDS.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 10:13:24 PM
      I always like to hear what ppl from Aruba are thinking. If they know any of the suspects or the witnesses, etc.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:13:24 PM
      KBM:  Please explain that we don't know each other.....


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 10:14:22 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      it also could be that the parents of natalee wanted to insurance money (i dont know why) and that they proffesionaly kidnapped her. and wait to get the money.
      (or maybe during the kidnapping something went wrong and she died(i dont know why))
      but still the father has writen a book now about it.

      thats just a theory just like the other thousands



      There is a data clearing institution that reports on every  insurance policy paid in this country.  It is how law enforcement and other insurance companies look out for fraud and people who go around making claims constantly.

      Natalee's parents did not even have a policy on her of any kind, not even a small one.

      This is the same story Aruba tried to tell about Max Devries who disappeared a couple of years before Natalee and it was a lie then, too.  His poor other never found out what happened to her son and any thing she collected she gave to a local children's hospital so she was hardly after money.

      It is so sad that these parents are accused of such things when they did not have any insurance on Natalee.  It is pretty much a matter of public record when people collect if you know where to look and are an isurance agent or law enforcement.  National records on every policy.  Helps keep folks honest.   :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:15:19 PM
      email me: NYSusan58@Yahoo.com


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:15:22 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Okay, everyone...I have a question for Florida.  Please tell me who you think is responsible for disapppearing Natalee if it isn't one of the 3 suspects?  I really want to know what you think.


      Hey, Hiram saw Nat's body in Posners place after the murder at the sloot dump.

      Guess Posner knows more about body disposal than PVDS.


      That's what I want to know, was she alive at the time Hiram saw her?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Frijole on October 24, 2006, 10:15:23 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Please explain that we don't know each other.....


      Not KBM but I don't know you and I don't know KBM and I don't know what you guys are talking about.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:16:48 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Okay, everyone...I have a question for Florida.  Please tell me who you think is responsible for disapppearing Natalee if it isn't one of the 3 suspects?  I really want to know what you think.


      Hey, Hiram saw Nat's body in Posners place after the murder at the sloot dump.

      Guess Posner knows more about body disposal than PVDS.


      That's what I want to know, was she alive at the time Hiram saw her?


      Sheese, wouldn't ya know a Shangoer would take my word for anything.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:17:42 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      Okay, everyone...I have a question for Florida.  Please tell me who you think is responsible for disapppearing Natalee if it isn't one of the 3 suspects?  I really want to know what you think.


      Hey, Hiram saw Nat's body in Posners place after the murder at the sloot dump.

      Guess Posner knows more about body disposal than PVDS.


      That's what I want to know, was she alive at the time Hiram saw her?


      Sheese, wouldn't ya know a Shangoer wouldn't take my word for anything.


      Edited


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:18:40 PM
      Hiram ....not me...claimed to have seen Natalee in the days since she disappeared in the neighbor's window....To the left of Hiram is Louis Posner & the right Michael Posner..................................................


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: yapperz1 on October 24, 2006, 10:18:41 PM
      Evening Monkeys
      Let's not be too quick to say our posters don't know what they are talking about. Please


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:18:42 PM
      well i dont know florida :?
      i only wanted the prove that  kawish was at the casinos that monday....because he wasnt there:p


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:19:19 PM
      How do you know?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Red on October 24, 2006, 10:20:14 PM
      BTW folks, you do realize who kbm is ... right?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:20:37 PM
      Quote from: "Red"
      BTW folks, you do realize who kbm is ... right?


      Yes, obviously.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:21:09 PM
      Quote from: "kbm"
      well i dont know florida :?
      i only wanted the prove that  kawish was at the casinos that monday....because he wasnt there:p


      Thanks, I appreciate your input. Now, tell me, do you think Paulus knows where the body is? And pay no attention to the naysayers...they don't like me too much when I talk Shango.  BTW do you know Shango?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:21:57 PM
      Quote from: "Red"
      BTW folks, you do realize who kbm is ... right?
      :wink:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:22:26 PM
      KBM:  Did you take down my email address?  :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 10:22:38 PM
      LOOKS LIKE I'M BACK JUST IN TIME  :wink:

      GET READY - THREAD WILL LOCK SOON  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Frijole on October 24, 2006, 10:22:52 PM
      Quote from: "yapperz1"
      Evening Monkeys
      Let's not be too quick to say our posters don't know what they are talking about. Please


      What I'm trying to say is that I am not UNDERSTANDING them... different thing entirely.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Kat_Gram on October 24, 2006, 10:22:52 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Red"
      BTW folks, you do realize who kbm is ... right?


      Yes, obviously.

      Well, I am stupid because I don't.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:23:23 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      KBM:  Did you take down my email address?  :D

      no why?
      plz post it again


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:24:02 PM
      KBM
      I wonder if most people on Aruba still think Natalee is alive somewhere? Could that be possible?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:24:19 PM
      ill be here till 11 because i have allot of homework


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Anna on October 24, 2006, 10:24:21 PM
      KBM,
      If you were in Holland and Kawish was in Holland at that time, is that how you know he wasn't at the casino?

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Florida on October 24, 2006, 10:25:01 PM
      NYSusan58@Yahoo.com


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:25:10 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      KBM,
      If you were in Holland and Kawish was in Holland at that time, is that how you know he wasn't at the casino?

      .

      yehs;)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: SunFreak2 on October 24, 2006, 10:25:12 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"


      Great! But ya might want to check on how to spell info?


      Thanks, I'll fix it!  :oops:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 10:25:40 PM
      (http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/nowlocked.jpg)

      Please move to LCD# 536

      http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=472


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Lala'sMom on October 24, 2006, 10:25:47 PM
      Quote from: "klaasend"
      LOOKS LIKE I'M BACK JUST IN TIME  :wink:

      GET READY - THREAD WILL LOCK SOON  :lol:


      Did you get the computer fixed while you were gone? :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Carnut on October 24, 2006, 10:26:02 PM
      Quote from: "Anna"
      KBM,
      If you were in Holland and Kawish was in Holland at that time, is that how you know he wasn't at the casino?

      .


      Oh come on Anna.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: AZLady on October 24, 2006, 10:26:04 PM
      kbm, do you know where Joran is now?  Is he on Aruba or in Netherlands?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: kbm on October 24, 2006, 10:26:16 PM
      Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
      KBM
      I wonder if most people on Aruba still think Natalee is alive somewhere? Could that be possible?

      yeh some think that


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: Red on October 24, 2006, 10:26:21 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "Red"
      BTW folks, you do realize who kbm is ... right?


      Yes, obviously.


      Just wanted to make sure everyone did realize this is Kawish.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: robots on October 24, 2006, 10:26:27 PM
      Quote from: "Carnut"
      Quote from: "robots"
      see, there are LEGITIMATE theories and then there are KOOKIE theories


      the theory that Natalee was kidnapped by her own family falls under the

      KOOKIE theory  :lol:  8)  8)  8)


      I thought it was a little farther out than KOOKIE.


      you are correct

      im sorry, im glad you corrected me  :D  :D


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: the big hammer on October 24, 2006, 10:26:28 PM
      All Right, Red...

      We'll Listen.

      But don't blame us if 5000 monkeys show up with flame throwers next time Kawish talks about insurance money and 4 hour arrivals.

      .


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #535 10/22 - 10/23/2006
      Post by: klaasend on October 24, 2006, 10:26:37 PM
      Quote from: "Florida"
      NYSusan58@Yahoo.com


      KBM - here is Florida's email address if you missed it.  By the way, welcome to SM  :wink: