Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:09:24 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:09:24 AM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 04:51:00 PM
It's possible Scubajap could be:

Angela Munzenhofer - reporter and friend of Julia Renfro. Family owns the Buccaneer Restaurant
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 04:53:09 PM
I've been to the Buccaneer Restaurant......Possible!

It was not a good dining experience.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 04:53:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
It's possible Scubajap could be:

Angela Munzenhofer - reporter and friend of Julia Renfro. Family owns the Buccaneer Restaurant
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angelaM1.jpg)

I wonder what her other investments are.

I hate this woman.  Remember seeing her on the news in the very beginning pretending to look for Natalee.  I hope someone shoots her too.  There I said it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 04:55:57 PM
Working on a little photoshop project, be back in a bit  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 04:57:55 PM
Just found this:

Well if they were rating a Special memorable experience in Aruba , the Morning Star would receive the 5 star rating! July of 2005...when I brought my Family... we had Eric and Sandra from www.perfectpicturesaruba.com take are family pictures and they were Fantastic..but this time I had bought a new Digital camera and thought I would give it a try...Then along comes Angela Munzenhofer...an editor from Aruba Today...and she takes are picture and does the article about us renewing our vows ( it came out in the February 17 edition ) and it was such a treat. She told me that If I know of anyone coming to the island for something Special..To have them give her a shout...This is what she does and she Loves it. She is also a Freelance Photographer...specializing in Weddings....So give her a shout at ..Bellarubaphoto@yahoo.com ...There might not be any Peach trees in Aruba...but she sure is a Peach.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 05:06:10 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Just found this:

Well if they were rating a Special memorable experience in Aruba , the Morning Star would receive the 5 star rating! July of 2005...when I brought my Family... we had Eric and Sandra from www.perfectpicturesaruba.com take are family pictures and they were Fantastic..but this time I had bought a new Digital camera and thought I would give it a try...Then along comes Angela Munzenhofer...an editor from Aruba Today...and she takes are picture and does the article about us renewing our vows ( it came out in the February 17 edition ) and it was such a treat. She told me that If I know of anyone coming to the island for something Special..To have them give her a shout...This is what she does and she Loves it. She is also a Freelance Photographer...specializing in Weddings....So give her a shout at ..Bellarubaphoto@yahoo.com ...There might not be any Peach trees in Aruba...but she sure is a Peach.


I think she and JR are both wedding specialists...take it for what it's worth...not saying what they specialize in..I think one or the other has some kind of bridal magazine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 05:08:09 PM
I agree...but, I wonder who the "Sandra" is.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 05:38:11 PM
From VisitAruba.Com

SandraTuesday, August 2nd, 2005, 12:44 PM
See that is what you get when you don't have time to read the board. You miss things.

For pictures of BP and family go to www.perfectpicturesaruba.com (http://www.perfectpicturesaruba.com) and click on the gallery. Second group of pictures are theirs. And I also placed some in the locations, that would be the lighthouse, Casibari and the north coast.

I will be posting a few directly here or I will show Dan how to do it. That we he can add his own comments to it.

Now if I can just find the time.......................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 05:53:26 PM
Florida, why are you so curious about SandraK and who she is in real life?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 05:59:46 PM
I'm angry about certain people from Aruba "swaying" the facts elsewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 06:05:25 PM
If I was an out spoken poster lving in Aruba/Michigan
The next county to Brough
And with some connection to "Automotive Enterprises"

I'd be looking at me also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:06:27 PM
Just wondered.  You might go to Refugees and talk to her there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:11:01 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
If I was an out spoken poster lving in Aruba/Michigan
The next county to Brough
And with some connection to "Automotive Enterprises"

I'd be looking at me also.

Florida - what makes you think SandraK has connections to Automotive Enterprises?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 06:11:07 PM
How's that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 06:12:51 PM
I thought she was "outed" on there as what.....?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:13:18 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
How's that?


Florida wrote:
Quote
If I was an out spoken poster lving in Aruba/Michigan
The next county to Brough
And with some connection to "Automotive Enterprises"

I'd be looking at me also.


I was referring to this post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:14:14 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
I thought she was "outed" on there as what.....?

SandraK is posting at RU using the name of Astrid.  She is posting at FOB using the name SandraK


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:14:26 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
I thought she was "outed" on there as what.....?


I don't know.  You seem to know a lot more about her than I do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 11, 2006, 06:15:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
If I was an out spoken poster lving in Aruba/Michigan
The next county to Brough
And with some connection to "Automotive Enterprises"

I'd be looking at me also.

Florida - what makes you think SandraK has connections to Automotive Enterprises?


AE could mean many things.......
My impresssion of Sandra is that she has connections to "Automovive"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:16:14 PM
Whoever SandraK is in real life, I rather doubt she involved in Natalee's disappearance.  If you want to know more about her, as Klaas indicated, go to RU or FOB and ask her your questions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:19:19 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
If I was an out spoken poster lving in Aruba/Michigan
The next county to Brough
And with some connection to "Automotive Enterprises"

I'd be looking at me also.

Florida - what makes you think SandraK has connections to Automotive Enterprises?


AE could mean many things.......
My impresssion of Sandra is that she has connections to "Automovive"


Well I try to go on more than just "impressions".  I have not seen anything linking SandraK to Automotive Enterprises.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:20:27 PM
Their future:
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/JoranDeepakJail.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 11, 2006, 06:25:54 PM
Shizaru, Because it is a discussion of something that probaly doesn't exist if the source was Joe T / Glenda / any of them that were looking at tapes trying to find the other suspect. Also, I am curious as to why you would go to that other board. Which was populated by the likes of Medley.

Klaasend, you are too funny !  !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:29:29 PM
Need to run to the store, will be back in a bit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:30:56 PM
This case is confusing, with all the lies and innuendos the suspects themselves have put out there.  Then, when people read and mix up their information and post it, that tends to get confusing, too.  It takes some careful reading and double checking of facts to avoid making connections and links that just aren't there.  Thank goodness we have our Klaas to help us keep it all straight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 06:33:58 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
This case is confusing, with all the lies and innuendos the suspects themselves have put out there.  Then, when people read and mix up their information and post it, that tends to get confusing, too.  It takes some careful reading and double checking of facts to avoid making connections and links that just aren't there.  Thank goodness we have our Klaas to help us keep it all straight!


Thanks AZLady - be right back!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 06:46:24 PM
Does anyone happen to know who the security company, meaning video security system, for the excelsior casino is?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:50:58 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone happen to know who the security company, meaning video security system, for the excelsior casino is?


Shadow, Klaas probably knows!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:51:45 PM
Is it the von Cromvoirt's company?  I'm not really sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 06:52:27 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone happen to know who the security company, meaning video security system, for the excelsior casino is?


Shadow, Klaas probably knows!


Thanks AZ! I'm just curious if it is/was GVC's dad's company, OR another one I've recently come across.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 06:59:22 PM
I really don't recall hearing which company.  I thought that Cromvoirt's company was security for the hotel strip, but I don't know for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:09:36 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
I really don't recall hearing which company.  I thought that Cromvoirt's company was security for the hotel strip, but I don't know for sure.


BELOW IS FROM THE THREAD SUNFREAK CREATED:

SECURITY –

VCB Security  – Video Camera Beveiligingssystemen.  Security firm owned by Wilhemus van Cromvoirt, Geoffrey’s father.  The Visibility Team, supplied by VCB, is part of Aruban police that patrols the beaches by ATV’s, SUV’s and boats.  This company provides security guards and video security for the beaches, hotels, casinos and other businesses on Aruba as well.


Wilhemus “Willem” Bernadus Henricus Papaya van Cromvoirt – owner & operator of VCB Security.  Father of Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. There is some question as to whether the Cromvoirt’s moved to the Netherlands.  Resided at 14D, Paradera, Aruba.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/GVCsDad.jpg)


The Visibility Team – Private security team of VCB, police trained, that function as police adjunct to patrol the beaches, Oranjestadt & San Nicholas.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/VisibilityTeam.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 07:10:55 PM
Does the casino video show who Joran was talking to before he sat down at the blackjack table?  Did he just go from the poker tournament to the blackjack table, as if he knew to go over there for some reason?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:14:25 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does the casino video show who Joran was talking to before he sat down at the blackjack table?  Did he just go from the poker tournament to the blackjack table, as if he knew to go over there for some reason?


Lala's, we would know a lot more about what happened that night if we could see all of the casino video.  We know it exists.  ALE has seen it.  I would like to see it, too, but I don't think that will happen any time soon.  I certainly hope de Vries sees all the video, don't you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:15:50 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
I really don't recall hearing which company.  I thought that Cromvoirt's company was security for the hotel strip, but I don't know for sure.


BELOW IS FROM THE THREAD SUNFREAK CREATED:

SECURITY –

VCB Security  – Video Camera Beveiligingssystemen.  Security firm owned by Wilhemus van Cromvoirt, Geoffrey’s father.  The Visibility Team, supplied by VCB, is part of Aruban police that patrols the beaches by ATV’s, SUV’s and boats.  This company provides security guards and video security for the beaches, hotels, casinos and other businesses on Aruba as well.


Wilhemus “Willem” Bernadus Henricus Papaya van Cromvoirt – owner & operator of VCB Security.  Father of Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. There is some question as to whether the Cromvoirt’s moved to the Netherlands.  Resided at 14D, Paradera, Aruba.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/GVCsDad.jpg)


The Visibility Team – Private security team of VCB, police trained, that function as police adjunct to patrol the beaches, Oranjestadt & San Nicholas.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/VisibilityTeam.jpg)


Thank you, San.  That's what I remember, too, but I don't like to guess at these things.  I appreciate your verification.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:16:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
I really don't recall hearing which company.  I thought that Cromvoirt's company was security for the hotel strip, but I don't know for sure.


BELOW IS FROM THE THREAD SUNFREAK CREATED:

SECURITY –

VCB Security  – Video Camera Beveiligingssystemen.  Security firm owned by Wilhemus van Cromvoirt, Geoffrey’s father.  The Visibility Team, supplied by VCB, is part of Aruban police that patrols the beaches by ATV’s, SUV’s and boats.  This company provides security guards and video security for the beaches, hotels, casinos and other businesses on Aruba as well.


Wilhemus “Willem” Bernadus Henricus Papaya van Cromvoirt – owner & operator of VCB Security.  Father of Geoffrey van Cromvoirt. There is some question as to whether the Cromvoirt’s moved to the Netherlands.  Resided at 14D, Paradera, Aruba.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/GVCsDad.jpg)


The Visibility Team – Private security team of VCB, police trained, that function as police adjunct to patrol the beaches, Oranjestadt & San Nicholas.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/VisibilityTeam.jpg)


Thanks San! I thought they were the security company but wasn't 100% sure. I know there as been a lot of talk regarding lime or other chemicals being used to help with decomposition and odor. I found a location that is a chemical supplier appears to be close to the GVC residence, from what I can tell, I may be wrong. Curious who owns this business:

Wonder Chemical Aruba
Paraguana 10-C
PARADERA
Tel: (297) 5870538
Fax: (297) 5827778


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:17:40 PM
Shadow, you can find the owner of any Aruban business here:
http://www.arubachamber.com/registry.asphttp://


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:22:32 PM
Quote from: "shadow"

Thanks San! I thought they were the security company but wasn't 100% sure. I know there as been a lot of talk regarding lime or other chemicals being used to help with decomposition and odor. I found a location that is a chemical supplier appears to be close to the GVC residence, from what I can tell, I may be wrong. Curious who owns this business:

Wonder Chemical Aruba
Paraguana 10-C
PARADERA
Tel: (297) 5870538
Fax: (297) 5827778

Well who better to help Paulus dispose of a body than a former police officer and now the head of a security company who has a few boats.  This guy and Paulus have to know each other.  I wonder what this guy was doing the night Natalee disappeared.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 07:26:51 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does the casino video show who Joran was talking to before he sat down at the blackjack table?  Did he just go from the poker tournament to the blackjack table, as if he knew to go over there for some reason?


Lala's, we would know a lot more about what happened that night if we could see all of the casino video.  We know it exists.  ALE has seen it.  I would like to see it, too, but I don't think that will happen any time soon.  I certainly hope de Vries sees all the video, don't you?


Indeed! I would like to know who Joran spoke to just before he sat down at that table.  We know Paulus was already there, so who was he talking to before he came to make the "pick" for the girl that daddy wanted?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:27:15 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "shadow"

Thanks San! I thought they were the security company but wasn't 100% sure. I know there as been a lot of talk regarding lime or other chemicals being used to help with decomposition and odor. I found a location that is a chemical supplier appears to be close to the GVC residence, from what I can tell, I may be wrong. Curious who owns this business:

Wonder Chemical Aruba
Paraguana 10-C
PARADERA
Tel: (297) 5870538
Fax: (297) 5827778

Well who better to help Paulus dispose of a body than a former police officer and now the head of a security company who has a few boats.  This guy and Paulus have to know each other.  I wonder what this guy was doing the night Natalee disappeared.


I still think if we are looking for a boat for body disposal, Koen's father's boat would be mighty convenient.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:27:53 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does the casino video show who Joran was talking to before he sat down at the blackjack table?  Did he just go from the poker tournament to the blackjack table, as if he knew to go over there for some reason?


Lala's, we would know a lot more about what happened that night if we could see all of the casino video.  We know it exists.  ALE has seen it.  I would like to see it, too, but I don't think that will happen any time soon.  I certainly hope de Vries sees all the video, don't you?


Indeed! I would like to know who Joran spoke to just before he sat down at that table.  We know Paulus was already there, so who was he talking to before he came to make the "pick" for the girl that daddy wanted?


I vote for Guido!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 07:29:29 PM
.
Does anyone else see a black dog's torso, hind leg and tail in this photo underneath the red arrows?  Minus the head as apparently dogs frequently are in Aruba.   :(
Just wondering.

Thanks in advance.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/aruba1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:30:53 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "shadow"

Thanks San! I thought they were the security company but wasn't 100% sure. I know there as been a lot of talk regarding lime or other chemicals being used to help with decomposition and odor. I found a location that is a chemical supplier appears to be close to the GVC residence, from what I can tell, I may be wrong. Curious who owns this business:

Wonder Chemical Aruba
Paraguana 10-C
PARADERA
Tel: (297) 5870538
Fax: (297) 5827778

Well who better to help Paulus dispose of a body than a former police officer and now the head of a security company who has a few boats.  This guy and Paulus have to know each other.  I wonder what this guy was doing the night Natalee disappeared.


I still think if we are looking for a boat for body disposal, Koen's father's boat would be mighty convenient.

It sure would but let's think about it.  Everything we have been fed is a lie.  It's all to throw us off into the opposite direction.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:34:25 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else see a black dog's torso, hind leg and tail in this photo underneath the red arrows?  Minus the head as apparently dogs frequently are in Aruba.   :(
Just wondering.

Thanks in advance.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/aruba1.jpg)

Sorry Anna I don't see it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 07:36:22 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone happen to know who the security company, meaning video security system, for the excelsior casino is?

No, I don't know.  I don't believe it's VCB though.  It would be a company contracted or owned by Posner, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:36:41 PM
Quote from: "San"


It sure would but let's think about it.  Everything we have been fed is a lie.  It's all to throw us off into the opposite direction.


San, if Koen, and possibly Daddy's boat, are not involved, then why would they sell the boat, leave Aruba so quickly, and we hear tales of Koen being so afraid he sleeps with Mommy?  Not to mention, Dave wanted the polis to talk to him, but they talked to Koen's Daddy instead!  And, don't forget the Prosecutor who quit the case because they wouldn't call Koen in for questioning--and this is from Dave H.  I think Koen and Daddy's boat are very involved in this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:38:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone happen to know who the security company, meaning video security system, for the excelsior casino is?

No, I don't know.  I don't believe it's VCB though.  It would be a company contracted or owned by Posner, IMO.


I agree.  I believe most casinos operate their own security and cameras.  This is too important a job to contract out.  They need control over this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 07:39:26 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else see a black dog's torso, hind leg and tail in this photo underneath the red arrows?  Minus the head as apparently dogs frequently are in Aruba.   :(
Just wondering.

Thanks in advance.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/aruba1.jpg)


Anna, I would have to see a larger picture or capture a new original.  I can't see anything here because it's too small  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 07:39:55 PM
.
Thanks, San.  It's all I can make out in that one.

Off for food. . . . .. . . .

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:42:10 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "San"


It sure would but let's think about it.  Everything we have been fed is a lie.  It's all to throw us off into the opposite direction.


San, if Koen, and possibly Daddy's boat, are not involved, then why would they sell the boat, leave Aruba so quickly, and we hear tales of Koen being so afraid he sleeps with Mommy?  Not to mention, Dave wanted the polis to talk to him, but they talked to Koen's Daddy instead!  And, don't forget the Prosecutor who quit the case because they wouldn't call Koen in for questioning--and this is from Dave H.  I think Koen and Daddy's boat are very involved in this.

AZLady, I'm not saying Koen isn't involved.  I do believe Koen and his brother Sander are involved.  I find it very strange that Sander's phone is stolen the same night that Natalee went missing.  I was just commenting on the boat whether it was used or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 07:43:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Does anyone else see a black dog's torso, hind leg and tail in this photo underneath the red arrows?  Minus the head as apparently dogs frequently are in Aruba.   :(
Just wondering.

Thanks in advance.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/aruba1.jpg)


Anna, I would have to see a larger picture or capture a new original.  I can't see anything here because it's too small  :wink:



Well, if you could see it, it would be even in this small one or enlarge with the page zoom.  Black body, hind leg sticking out to the left and tail at the bottom.  

Its very large and clear if you see it.  If you don't, I don't think it matters how large/small.  About the largest thing in the photo except the man.

I can email you the larger one but it's really not important.  Will send to you via email after I scrounge up dinner.

Thanks.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 07:44:50 PM
Koen's daddy's boat is involved in some way.  That is the reason the subject of Joran on a boat came up in the statement by Sander.  Someone, somewhere knew a boat was involved or could have been involved that caused ALE to ask Sander about the boat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:46:31 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone happen to know who the security company, meaning video security system, for the excelsior casino is?

No, I don't know.  I don't believe it's VCB though.  It would be a company contracted or owned by Posner, IMO.


I agree.  I believe most casinos operate their own security and cameras.  This is too important a job to contract out.  They need control over this.


I agree, too important to contract out, especially if you are Posner, IMO. The other company I cam across was supposively handling the security for the Aruba Marriott Resort Stellaris Casino

North American Video, Inc.: Casino Enterprise Management
Soaring Eagle’s Security Staff


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:47:04 PM
Thank you AZLady for the link!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:47:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "San"


It sure would but let's think about it.  Everything we have been fed is a lie.  It's all to throw us off into the opposite direction.


San, if Koen, and possibly Daddy's boat, are not involved, then why would they sell the boat, leave Aruba so quickly, and we hear tales of Koen being so afraid he sleeps with Mommy?  Not to mention, Dave wanted the polis to talk to him, but they talked to Koen's Daddy instead!  And, don't forget the Prosecutor who quit the case because they wouldn't call Koen in for questioning--and this is from Dave H.  I think Koen and Daddy's boat are very involved in this.

AZLady, I'm not saying Koen isn't involved.  I do believe Koen and his brother Sander are involved.  I find it very strange that Sander's phone is stolen the same night that Natalee went missing.  I was just commenting on the boat whether it was used or not.


San, you are right that we are told the exact opposite of what happened to intentionally throw us off the track.  I do think they used a boat to dispose of her body, eventually.  Maybe the Gottenbos, maybe a boat that GVC had access to.  Some even said that Steve Croes had access to the Tatoo's small dinghy.  They could have used that.  I sure hope de Vries discovers some of these details and tells all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 11, 2006, 07:48:06 PM
Some of the pictures at that site concerned me, this one in particular.
http://www.perfectpicturesaruba.com/fotos/Gallery/tam3.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 11, 2006, 07:48:58 PM
The call was heard all the way to Bill's house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:49:07 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Thank you AZLady for the link!

You're welcome, Shadow.  If you search for the word "chemical" you will find your company and the owner's name is on the document.  However, they were defunct in 1998.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:49:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Koen's daddy's boat is involved in some way.  That is the reason the subject of Joran on a boat came up in the statement by Sander.  Someone, somewhere knew a boat was involved or could have been involved that caused ALE to ask Sander about the boat.


We also thought Steve Croes was involved and he had access to a boat both big and small.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 07:50:14 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Koen's daddy's boat is involved in some way.  That is the reason the subject of Joran on a boat came up in the statement by Sander.  Someone, somewhere knew a boat was involved or could have been involved that caused ALE to ask Sander about the boat.


We also thought Steve Croes was involved and he had access to a boat both big and small.


I wanted to add since when do we believe the ALE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 07:50:17 PM
Anna
For the first time in all my looking at those photos I actually see what you are talking about.  I would like to see a much larger version to be sure, but going from your description I understand why you say this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:51:25 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shadow, you can find the owner of any Aruban business here:
http://www.arubachamber.com/registry.asphttp://


Apparently Wonder Chemical Aruba is not listed in the online registry. Hmmm??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:51:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Some of the pictures at that site concerned me, this one in particular.
http://www.perfectpicturesaruba.com/fotos/Gallery/tam3.jpg


Hi Tyler.  Hope you are feeling better.  I don't like seeing pics of little girls like that on the internet, even though the pic appears to be innocent enough.  But, that's just me.  I prefer not to see child models.  In this day, with all the perverts around, children should be protected, and that means their images, too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:52:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Koen's daddy's boat is involved in some way.  That is the reason the subject of Joran on a boat came up in the statement by Sander.  Someone, somewhere knew a boat was involved or could have been involved that caused ALE to ask Sander about the boat.


We also thought Steve Croes was involved and he had access to a boat both big and small.


I wanted to add since when do we believe the ALE.


Thank you! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:53:05 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shadow, you can find the owner of any Aruban business here:
http://www.arubachamber.com/registry.asphttp://


Apparently Wonder Chemical Aruba is not listed in the online registry. Hmmm??


Shadow, it's there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:54:23 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shadow, you can find the owner of any Aruban business here:
http://www.arubachamber.com/registry.asphttp://


Apparently Wonder Chemical Aruba is not listed in the online registry. Hmmm??


Shadow, it's there.


I got no results when I searched the registry. I'll go back . . .  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 07:56:25 PM
San
I don't trust ALE either, but unless you decide to take some of the statements at face value and try to find the truth among the lies, there is little sense of us even trying to help.  Why would ALE ask a question about a boat, UNLESS, they knew there was suspicion of a boat being involved.  Maybe they were trying to rule the Gottenbos' boat out and this is why they asked a benign question such as that to Sander.  It was obvious they had no intention of asking that question to Koen, so ask the one person that doesn't have the answer so you don't get the answer you need. Then you can say..."No, boat was ever involved.  Next..."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:56:35 PM
Appearing in the Trade Register of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in ARUBA since 27 OCTOBER 1986 under serial number 6329.0 is the company with the trade name:
 
 
WONDERCHEMICAL N.V.  
 
Business address AVENIDA DON MILIO CROES (V/H FERGUSONSTRAAT) 19, ORANJESTAD OOST  
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY  
Name of the company  WONDERCHEMICAL N.V.  
Statutory seat  ARUBA  
Date of incorporation  24 OCTOBER 1986  
     
Authorized capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 50,000.00  
Issued capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00  
Paid up capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00  
THIS COMPANY HAS BEEN STRICKEN FROM OUR FILES 31 JANUARY 1998  
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD:  
 
CREUTZBERG, PETER;  
Residing in  PARAGUANA 10-C, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, 'S-GRAVENHAGE on 12 DECEMBER 1948  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR  
Effective  24 OCTOBER 1986  
Authority  FULL  
   
OBJECTIVE(S) OF THE COMPANY  
 
HET FABRICEREN EN VERPAKKEN VAN - ALSMEDE DE GROOT- EN AGENTURENHANDEL IN - INDUSTRIELE- EN HUISHOUDELIJKE CHEMICALIEN, ZOALS SCHOONMAAKMIDDELEN, VERDELGINGSMIDDELEN EN KUNSTMEST PRODUCTEN.  
   
Only valid if accordingly signed by the Chamber of Commerce & Industry Aruba - J.E. Irausquin Blvd.10, Oranjestad, Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:56:38 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shadow, you can find the owner of any Aruban business here:
http://www.arubachamber.com/registry.asphttp://


Apparently Wonder Chemical Aruba is not listed in the online registry. Hmmm??


Shadow, it's there.


I got no results when I searched the registry. I'll go back . . .  :oops:


Still didn't work for me ... I have to go to dinner. BBL and thank you.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 07:57:41 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Appearing in the Trade Register of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in ARUBA since 27 OCTOBER 1986 under serial number 6329.0 is the company with the trade name:
 
 
WONDERCHEMICAL N.V.  
 
Business address AVENIDA DON MILIO CROES (V/H FERGUSONSTRAAT) 19, ORANJESTAD OOST  
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY  
Name of the company  WONDERCHEMICAL N.V.  
Statutory seat  ARUBA  
Date of incorporation  24 OCTOBER 1986  
     
Authorized capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 50,000.00  
Issued capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00  
Paid up capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00  
THIS COMPANY HAS BEEN STRICKEN FROM OUR FILES 31 JANUARY 1998  
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD:  
 
CREUTZBERG, PETER;  
Residing in  PARAGUANA 10-C, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, 'S-GRAVENHAGE on 12 DECEMBER 1948  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR  
Effective  24 OCTOBER 1986  
Authority  FULL  
   
OBJECTIVE(S) OF THE COMPANY  
 
HET FABRICEREN EN VERPAKKEN VAN - ALSMEDE DE GROOT- EN AGENTURENHANDEL IN - INDUSTRIELE- EN HUISHOUDELIJKE CHEMICALIEN, ZOALS SCHOONMAAKMIDDELEN, VERDELGINGSMIDDELEN EN KUNSTMEST PRODUCTEN.  
   
Only valid if accordingly signed by the Chamber of Commerce & Industry Aruba - J.E. Irausquin Blvd.10, Oranjestad, Aruba.


You rock AZLady! Thank you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 07:57:51 PM
Shadow, I still don't see the significance of this defunct company.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 11, 2006, 07:59:55 PM
If you want to see really inappropriate (IMO )pix of kids, go to Diario and look at the kids Halloween party at C & C's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:03:28 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
If you want to see really inappropriate (IMO )pix of kids, go to Diario and look at the kids Halloween party at C & C's.


You know, kids learn by example and by watching the people around them.  If suggestive, sexual behavior is considered appropriate and even cute, then it makes me wonder what these kids really think?  Are they confused and scared by this stuff that they don't understand and are helpless to avoid?  Poor kids...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:05:55 PM
I wonder about people who treat kids as if they are just little adults in small bodies.  Don't these people know that kids are not little adults?  Are they so dense that they don't remember, or understand, that children do not understand this stuff and are frightened by aggressive sexual behaviors?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 11, 2006, 08:15:05 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
San
I don't trust ALE either, but unless you decide to take some of the statements at face value and try to find the truth among the lies, there is little sense of us even trying to help.  Why would ALE ask a question about a boat, UNLESS, they knew there was suspicion of a boat being involved.  Maybe they were trying to rule the Gottenbos' boat out and this is why they asked a benign question such as that to Sander.  It was obvious they had no intention of asking that question to Koen, so ask the one person that doesn't have the answer so you don't get the answer you need. Then you can say..."No, boat was ever involved.  Next..."

Lala's I'm just questioning whether it was that particular boat that's all.  The ALE knows which boat was used.  So why not ask one of Joran's freinds who has a boat because they know they aren't going to find anything on it.  We need to question everything.  JMO.  No further comments from me on the boat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 11, 2006, 08:17:32 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
If you want to see really inappropriate (IMO )pix of kids, go to Diario and look at the kids Halloween party at C & C's.


You know, kids learn by example and by watching the people around them.  If suggestive, sexual behavior is considered appropriate and even cute, then it makes me wonder what these kids really think?  Are they confused and scared by this stuff that they don't understand and are helpless to avoid?  Poor kids...


Well I think in this regard, we need to do some cleaning right here in the US....  and I totatlly agree with you, btw.

Oh and is anyone else watching The Wizard of Oz?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:20:48 PM
I'm with you, Mrs. Red.  The best way to raise children to let them be children and not push them into an adult world before they are ready.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:22:38 PM
Hubby was watching Steven Segal shoot-em-up earlier, and he's waiting with remote ready for the football game at 7 pm.  Don't ask me which one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:24:29 PM
I just went outside and turned on the spa heater.  I'm going to take a soak soon, once it heats up.  Lazy Saturday night around here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 11, 2006, 08:25:16 PM
I have to watch the Wizard every year... it's the offical start of the Holidays.... LOL...


and it makes me sad to know that this was Natalee's favorite movie and we are still no closer to seeing justice for her death....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 11, 2006, 08:31:37 PM
running out monkeys... worked hard on getting the house ready for winter... so I am tired :twisted:


BBL... keep the faith!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sirensong on November 11, 2006, 08:40:32 PM
CREUTZBERG, PETER

This name is familiar.  I think I have seen it on other business registrations


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:49:10 PM
Quote from: "sirensong"
CREUTZBERG, PETER

This name is familiar.  I think I have seen it on other business registrations

It's new to me.  But, ask Klaas.  She has a mind like a steel trap for names.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 08:49:26 PM
Quote from: "sirensong"
CREUTZBERG, PETER

This name is familiar.  I think I have seen it on other business registrations


http://www.aruba-mahimahi.com/captain/index.shtml

(http://www.aruba-mahimahi.com/graphics/peter_creutzberg.jpg)

Bon Bini!

I am Captain Peter Creutzberg, an Aruban sport fishing veteran
(that's me on the left). Over the years, I've fought hundreds
of Mahi Mahi, Marlin, Sailfish and other Aruban game fish.

Let me and my crew take you out for a fishing trip around the
island of Aruba


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 08:53:23 PM
Aha, I told you Klaas would know!   :lol:   Well done, Klaas.  I've never heard of him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 08:54:25 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Aha, I told you Klaas would know!   :lol:   Well done, Klaas.  I've never heard of him.

Actually I didn't know, lol.  I just googled his name and Aruba.  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sirensong on November 11, 2006, 08:55:33 PM
Klass, you are SO fast!!  I think it is interesting he had a company near Paulus, and owns a deep sea boat.  But I have seen his name somewhere else, will keep looking.  I am sure it was in connection with one of the businesses on Aruba that the monkeys were looking at.  Like all the ones in Florida.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 08:56:56 PM
Has anyone else noticed that almost all the businesses in Aruba appear to be owned by the Dutch?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 11, 2006, 09:00:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Has anyone else noticed that almost all the businesses in Aruba appear to be owned by the Dutch?


Yes, I have.  I see very few businesses owned by Arubans.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 09:15:18 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shadow, I still don't see the significance of this defunct company.


There may be no significance whatsoever ... just following a train of thought regarding the access of previously discussed chemicals. There was only one other listing on business directory of a chemical supplier. May not be the right tree, but I figured it was worth asking about/looking into.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 09:17:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "sirensong"
CREUTZBERG, PETER

This name is familiar.  I think I have seen it on other business registrations


http://www.aruba-mahimahi.com/captain/index.shtml

(http://www.aruba-mahimahi.com/graphics/peter_creutzberg.jpg)

Bon Bini!

I am Captain Peter Creutzberg, an Aruban sport fishing veteran
(that's me on the left). Over the years, I've fought hundreds
of Mahi Mahi, Marlin, Sailfish and other Aruban game fish.

Let me and my crew take you out for a fishing trip around the
island of Aruba


Very interesting . . . good catch Klass. no pun intended :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 09:22:34 PM
Anna - I took my own screen capture of the rock area where you think you are seeing a dog.  I really think it's simply the shadow caused by the crevice between the two or three rock formation:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockCrevace.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 09:27:08 PM
Does anyone think this PETER CREUTZBERG looks similar to the bearded rock painter in the video??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 09:28:56 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone think this PETER CREUTZBERG looks similar to the bearded rock painter in the video??

Yep, first thing I thought of but there are probably plenty of other people in Aruba that resemble that guy too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 09:31:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone think this PETER CREUTZBERG looks similar to the bearded rock painter in the video??

Yep, first thing I thought of but there are probably plenty of other people in Aruba that resemble that guy too.


I'm sure you're right.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 11, 2006, 09:34:27 PM
Evening all.  

Anyone look at the November 10th images from C&C's posted on the CoolAruba website?  Might as well be pornography imo.  I was told guy on the stage wearing the white polo style shirt and jeans was recently fired from the Tamarijn Hotel for an alleged rape.  

Now it seems he is hosting live HANDS ON ‘entertainment’ at C&C's http://i10.tinypic.com/2d6vdpg.jpg (The images are a bit graphic, no nudity, but as close as you can get, the other pictures hosted on CoolAruba.com from that night, on the other hand…).  If anyone has any details about this alleged rape please let me know.   I should have a name to go with this face in due time...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 09:37:29 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Evening all.  

Anyone look at the November 10th images from C&C's posted on the CoolAruba website?  Might as well be pornography imo.  I was told guy on the stage wearing the white polo style shirt and jeans was recently fired from the Tamarijn Hotel for an alleged rape.  

Now it seems he is hosting live HANDS ON ‘entertainment’ at C&C's http://i10.tinypic.com/2d6vdpg.jpg (The images are a bit graphic, no nudity, but as close as you can get, the other pictures hosted on CoolAruba.com from that night, on the other hand…).  If anyone has any details about this alleged rape please let me know.   I should have a name to go with this face in due time...

Grande - Yes, I noticed those photos earlier today.  Amazing huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 11, 2006, 09:38:04 PM
Short Slide Show
http://tinyurl.com/yywrro
107 New Pic Slides Uploaded This Morning
http://tinyurl.com/myjk9
Comment by Carpe Noctem | November 10, 2006, 1:29 pm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 11, 2006, 09:41:23 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Anna
For the first time in all my looking at those photos I actually see what you are talking about.  I would like to see a much larger version to be sure, but going from your description I understand why you say this.


I saw it when we were discussing these pictures before.  Anna pointed it out to me and I could definitely see it, the only thing that I have ever seen in these pictures that made sense.  "Deepak brought two dogs...."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 11, 2006, 09:42:47 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Some of the pictures at that site concerned me, this one in particular.
http://www.perfectpicturesaruba.com/fotos/Gallery/tam3.jpg


Hi Tyler.  Hope you are feeling better.  I don't like seeing pics of little girls like that on the internet, even though the pic appears to be innocent enough.  But, that's just me.  I prefer not to see child models.  In this day, with all the perverts around, children should be protected, and that means their images, too.


Perhaps innocent, but with the likes of Arubans involved and that business that going on down there, with the bride (?) business, the male models, etc., etc., it makes me wonder why these small girls pictures are being taken in such a seductive manner.....makes me go hmmmmmmm.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 09:44:36 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Anna
For the first time in all my looking at those photos I actually see what you are talking about.  I would like to see a much larger version to be sure, but going from your description I understand why you say this.


I saw it when we were discussing these pictures before.  Anna pointed it out to me and I could definitely see it, the only thing that I have ever seen in these pictures that made sense.  "Deepak brought two dogs...."


I guess it looks like a dog in the small pic, but it is just shadow in the larger version.  Figures, I didn't see anything...never have been able to see anything in those videos.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 11, 2006, 09:47:19 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone think this PETER CREUTZBERG looks similar to the bearded rock painter in the video??
 Yes, absolutely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 09:47:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Anna
For the first time in all my looking at those photos I actually see what you are talking about.  I would like to see a much larger version to be sure, but going from your description I understand why you say this.


I saw it when we were discussing these pictures before.  Anna pointed it out to me and I could definitely see it, the only thing that I have ever seen in these pictures that made sense.  "Deepak brought two dogs...."


I guess it looks like a dog in the small pic, but it is just shadow in the larger version.  Figures, I didn't see anything...never have been able to see anything in those videos.  :roll:

Sorry Lala's, I'm not trying to persuade anyone, I just don't see a dog..I see a shadow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 11, 2006, 09:48:48 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Evening all.  

Anyone look at the November 10th images from C&C's posted on the CoolAruba website?  Might as well be pornography imo.  I was told guy on the stage wearing the white polo style shirt and jeans was recently fired from the Tamarijn Hotel for an alleged rape.  

Now it seems he is hosting live HANDS ON ‘entertainment’ at C&C's http://i10.tinypic.com/2d6vdpg.jpg (The images are a bit graphic, no nudity, but as close as you can get, the other pictures hosted on CoolAruba.com from that night, on the other hand…).  If anyone has any details about this alleged rape please let me know.   I should have a name to go with this face in due time...


There were some worse than this posted at "College Republicans" (I think that was the name of it, but not sure.  I bet Klaas remembers).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 09:49:52 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Grande"
Evening all.  

Anyone look at the November 10th images from C&C's posted on the CoolAruba website?  Might as well be pornography imo.  I was told guy on the stage wearing the white polo style shirt and jeans was recently fired from the Tamarijn Hotel for an alleged rape.  

Now it seems he is hosting live HANDS ON ‘entertainment’ at C&C's http://i10.tinypic.com/2d6vdpg.jpg (The images are a bit graphic, no nudity, but as close as you can get, the other pictures hosted on CoolAruba.com from that night, on the other hand…).  If anyone has any details about this alleged rape please let me know.   I should have a name to go with this face in due time...


There were some worse than this posted at "College Republicans" (I think that was the name of it, but not sure.  I bet Klaas remembers).

That website doesn't exist any more.  I think it was Young Proud Republican, or something like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 10:00:52 PM
I just want to see "something" besides plastic bags and paint is all. I want to believe there is really something of value in those videos...just have to keep trying.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 11, 2006, 10:03:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Grande"
Evening all.  

Anyone look at the November 10th images from C&C's posted on the CoolAruba website?  Might as well be pornography imo.  I was told guy on the stage wearing the white polo style shirt and jeans was recently fired from the Tamarijn Hotel for an alleged rape.  

Now it seems he is hosting live HANDS ON ‘entertainment’ at C&C's http://i10.tinypic.com/2d6vdpg.jpg (The images are a bit graphic, no nudity, but as close as you can get, the other pictures hosted on CoolAruba.com from that night, on the other hand…).  If anyone has any details about this alleged rape please let me know.   I should have a name to go with this face in due time...


There were some worse than this posted at "College Republicans" (I think that was the name of it, but not sure.  I bet Klaas remembers).

That website doesn't exist any more.  I think it was Young Proud Republican, or something like that.


The pictures are bad enough.   Then add a guy who allegedly raped a women at the Tamarijn hotel...  It seems C&C's either does no background checks or disregards prior criminal activity when empolying these people to host what is essentially porn IMO.  

It's not the pictures that are this issue here.  It is what Aruba is marketing.  They have huge national ad campaigns and project an significant increase in tourism for 2007, yet it seems they are not taking the necessary steps to protect these tourists.  Corruption within the law enforcement breeds criminal behavior, therefore along with the projected increase in tourism I suspect there will be a similar increase in crime.  It is only a matter of time....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 11, 2006, 10:06:58 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I just want to see "something" besides plastic bags and paint is all. I want to believe there is really something of value in those videos...just have to keep trying.  :lol:


I know Lala, Im with you on that.  Regardless, Carpe deserves his props.  He has dedicated months to those videos... Just wanted to share them in honor of his efforts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 10:08:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - I took my own screen capture of the rock area where you think you are seeing a dog.  I really think it's simply the shadow caused by the crevice between the two or three rock formation:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockCrevace.jpg)



Thanks, Klaas,
Still looks just like big black dog to me, just sorta flattened from being in the sun a few days, maybe sunken into crevices as decomp starts.

Like looking at clouds, we all see different things.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:13:38 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Peter R. de Vries Now Investigating … “Something Bad Happened” in Aruba


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/11/11/peter-r-de-vries-now-investigating-something-bad-happened-in-aruba/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 10:13:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - I took my own screen capture of the rock area where you think you are seeing a dog.  I really think it's simply the shadow caused by the crevice between the two or three rock formation:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockCrevace.jpg)



I used this image from earlier because it seems clearer...what is the area just above the really dark area we are calling a dog...the area where it is sort of gray looking as if something is draped over the rock near the top?  Anyone see that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 10:16:04 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "shadow"
Does anyone think this PETER CREUTZBERG looks similar to the bearded rock painter in the video??
 Yes, absolutely.


Is this the same guy we ID'ed a long time ago in a photo with what looks like some sort of badge attached to his belt?

Doens't every business require a Dutch passport holdre for registration?  Thought also we ran across a ruling like that long ago.  Can be of any extraction but must hold Dutch citizenship.

In other words, must be a resident to The Kingdom from any region.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:17:27 PM
Lala's - I'm not positive but I do know that is in the same area where we see the guy spreading out the plastic/white tarp.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 10:22:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Lala's - I'm not positive but I do know that is in the same area where we see the guy spreading out the plastic/white tarp.


It's probably just the way the sun is shining on those rocks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 11, 2006, 10:22:09 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - I took my own screen capture of the rock area where you think you are seeing a dog.  I really think it's simply the shadow caused by the crevice between the two or three rock formation:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockCrevace.jpg)



I used this image from earlier because it seems clearer...what is the area just above the really dark area we are calling a dog...the area where it is sort of gray looking as if something is draped over the rock near the top?  Anyone see that?


 :shock: ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:24:08 PM
Grande - some were thinking that the shadow area between the rocks may have been a dead dog.  I enlarged and highlighted the area and I think it's simply a shadow in the crevice of the rocks.  What do you think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 11, 2006, 10:26:09 PM
At first glance it appears to be a doctored image/shadow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 10:26:59 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna - I took my own screen capture of the rock area where you think you are seeing a dog.  I really think it's simply the shadow caused by the crevice between the two or three rock formation:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockCrevace.jpg)



I used this image from earlier because it seems clearer...what is the area just above the really dark area we are calling a dog...the area where it is sort of gray looking as if something is draped over the rock near the top?  Anyone see that?


 :shock: ???



Lalas,
I can't tell what that is at the top.  Something.   :shock: The reason I do not see it as a shadow is look closely at the top one and notice where the hind leg attached is in very bright sunlight and yet it doesn't receed into the crevice but looks flat like the light is hitting on something solid and very shallow in the indentions.  The hind leg seems forward instead of in shadows to me.  The shadow does not go back as it should but seems very shallow.

But as I said, this is like looking at clouds, we all see something different.  And no matter what we see, it's not likely to make a tremendous difference in helping to find Natalee.  Unfortunately.  
 :(
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:28:00 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
At first glance it appears to be a doctored image/shadow.

Well of course it's doctored in my enlarged and highlighted photo capture from the video.  Only doctored to the extent that I enlarged and highlighted it though.  I didn't paint anything on the rocks, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:30:47 PM
Here's another screen capture (un-highlighted) of the same rock formation from a slightly different angle:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 10:32:44 PM
Question: Regarding the statement by Joran that D showed up with 2 dogs, was this statement made before or after the bloody mattress declared to be covered in canine blood was found?? Anyone know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 10:33:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here's another screen capture (un-highlighted) of the same rock formation from a slightly different angle:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockDog2.jpg)



Okay, I guess it's just a shadow...dang it..I really thought it was a dog.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 10:34:47 PM
Because I'm wondering if the statement was made to deflect attention from and cast suspicion on Deepak as opposed to an actual statement of truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 10:36:23 PM
.
Carlos and Charlies's seems to hire the island misfits.   :shock:

If they are a suspect in a crime, they can always get a job there!

At least Steve Croes and this guy in the photos did.

. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:37:28 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Question: Regarding the statement by Joran that D showed up with 2 dogs, was this statement made before or after the bloody mattress declared to be covered in canine blood was found?? Anyone know?

The bloody mattress was found on June 5th, 2005.  I'm not sure which statement Joran said Deepak showed up with 2 dogs though and I'm too lazy to look through them all right now, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:38:25 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Carlos and Charlies's seems to hire the island misfits.   :shock:

If they are a suspect in a crime, they can always get a job there!

At least Steve Croes and this guy in the photos did.

. :shock:

Yeah, it's almost a promotion or reward  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 11, 2006, 10:39:19 PM
Looks different in that angle.  That's the prob with photo or even vids, play on light.  Need to see live to really tell anything much.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 11, 2006, 10:42:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
At first glance it appears to be a doctored image/shadow.

Well of course it's doctored in my enlarged and highlighted photo capture from the video.  Only doctored to the extent that I enlarged and highlighted it though.  I didn't paint anything on the rocks, lol  :lol:


Klaas - but knowing you, you could have with just a few mouse clicks and a remote paint brush!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:42:16 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Looks different in that angle.  That's the prob with photo or even vids, play on light.  Need to see live to really tell anything much.

.

Anna - I agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 11, 2006, 10:42:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "shadow"
Question: Regarding the statement by Joran that D showed up with 2 dogs, was this statement made before or after the bloody mattress declared to be covered in canine blood was found?? Anyone know?

The bloody mattress was found on June 5th, 2005.  I'm not sure which statement Joran said Deepak showed up with 2 dogs though and I'm too lazy to look through them all right now, lol  :lol:


 :lol: I understand . . . I think I'm going to have to call it a night. Peace out monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:44:17 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
At first glance it appears to be a doctored image/shadow.

Well of course it's doctored in my enlarged and highlighted photo capture from the video.  Only doctored to the extent that I enlarged and highlighted it though.  I didn't paint anything on the rocks, lol  :lol:


Klaas - but knowing you, you could have with just a few mouse clicks and a remote paint brush!


 :lol:  :lol:

But in all seriousness, I would never alter a photo or screen capture of any of these videos other than to change the brightness or contrast to see a dark area better.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 11, 2006, 10:47:12 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Question: Regarding the statement by Joran that D showed up with 2 dogs, was this statement made before or after the bloody mattress declared to be covered in canine blood was found?? Anyone know?


Got it:

<snip>

Quote
“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.
J. van der STRATEN  (signed by Jan VDS)


Note that this is one of van der Straten's statements about what was said/done.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:49:10 PM
Although I have to admit it crossed my mind to photoshop this cartoon dog playing dead in one of the photos.  But like I said, this is too serious to play around with.

(http://www.barbpel.com/Images/gallery/barnyard/DeadDogtmb.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 10:50:37 PM
Thanks msmarples.  So...June 5th bloody mattress found, June 13th statement from Van Der Straaten.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 11, 2006, 10:51:30 PM
Actually, I was a little quick with the snip in the previous post. Just noticed that unless there's a typo or something, apparently the statement was made on 6/13, but VDS didn't submit it until 6/17 - or something like that. Here is the beginning of the statement, which is quite short compared to most of the others:

Quote
I, Jan van der STRATEN, police chief with the Aruban Police Corps, state the following.

On Monday June 13th 2005, at approximately 13.00 hours [1:00 pm] I spoke informally with the suspect Joran Andreas Petrus v/d SLOOT at the police station in Oranjestad.


To clarify, this is the beginning of the statement about "two dogs".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 11, 2006, 10:55:25 PM
Joran's story about Deepak and the two dawgs sounds as phony as the first statement he made...for that matter all the rest he made too...How he came to say that makes little sense to me..why two dawgs?  Furthermore, why didn't the ALE even ask what he meant by that?  Because they already knew it was a bunch of hooey, that's why.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 11:04:54 PM
Kat_Gram just posted this on the front page of SM.  I nominate it as the post of the day!!

I would like to suggest that ” something bad happened ”
the day Joran was born.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mrsn2itiv on November 11, 2006, 11:25:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
At first glance it appears to be a doctored image/shadow.
Well of course it's doctored in my enlarged and highlighted photo capture from the video.  Only doctored to the extent that I enlarged and highlighted it though.  I didn't paint anything on the rocks, lol  :lol:
Lol ;-)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 11:53:40 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaChainGang.jpg)

Note, the above photo is doctored, lol :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 11, 2006, 11:54:49 PM
http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

I went to deVries website after reading the FP.   Guy is quite attractive.  Depending on the audience, I might say he's hot.  Sizzlin'.  I hope he's as smart and tough as his reputation and something good comes of his investigation.   I'm going to mention his name in my prayers for justice in this case and comfort for the Beth and Dave.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sue on November 11, 2006, 11:55:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kat_Gram just posted this on the front page of SM.  I nominate it as the post of the day!!

I would like to suggest that ” something bad happened ”
the day Joran was born.


Yeah The devils Spawn, I bet if we shaved his head we would find 3 666
in the form of a triangle also


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 11, 2006, 11:56:51 PM
Klaas!  That's the picture we all dream of!  But ...  but  ...  but  .... where's Freddy?  He's got to tell the truth!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 11:57:12 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

I went to deVries website after reading the FP.   Guy is quite attractive.  Depending on the audience, I might say he's hot.  Sizzlin'.  I hope he's as smart and tough as his reputation and something good comes of his investigation.   I'm going to mention his name in my prayers for justice in this case and comfort for the Beth and Dave.


Yep  :wink:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/peter_r_de_vries_29347h.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 11, 2006, 11:57:43 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Klaas!  That's the picture we all dream of!  But ...  but  ...  but  .... where's Freddy?  He's got to tell the truth!

Freddy is in the shower picking up the soap  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 11, 2006, 11:58:13 PM
Quote from: "Sue"

Yeah The devils Spawn, I bet if we shaved his head we would find 3 666
in the form of a triangle also


 :idea:
New Movie:  Anita's Baby (Step aside, Rosemary!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sue on November 11, 2006, 11:58:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
http://www.peterrdevries.nl/

I went to deVries website after reading the FP.   Guy is quite attractive.  Depending on the audience, I might say he's hot.  Sizzlin'.  I hope he's as smart and tough as his reputation and something good comes of his investigation.   I'm going to mention his name in my prayers for justice in this case and comfort for the Beth and Dave.


Yep  :wink:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/peter_r_de_vries_29347h.jpg)



I wouldnt kick him out of the monkey cage for eating crackers :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 12:00:36 AM
Quote from: "Sue"

Yep  :wink:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/peter_r_de_vries_29347h.jpg)



I wouldnt kick him out of the monkey cage for eating crackers :wink:[/quote]

Sue, if this man was in the cage with us girlie monkeys, we wouldn't be serving up crackers.   :wink:  :shock:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 12:02:16 AM
Hugging Nemo time...night all. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 12:02:50 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Klaas!  That's the picture we all dream of!  But ...  but  ...  but  .... where's Freddy?  He's got to tell the truth!

Freddy is in the shower picking up the soap  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Ok, between this and DeVries, we're close to going over the PG13 edge here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 12:03:46 AM
Night Lala's Mom.  Sleep well and have a great Sunday.  God bless!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:06:17 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hugging Nemo time...night all. :wink:

Nite Lala's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:07:51 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
At first glance it appears to be a doctored image/shadow.

Well of course it's doctored in my enlarged and highlighted photo capture from the video.  Only doctored to the extent that I enlarged and highlighted it though.  I didn't paint anything on the rocks, lol  :lol:


Klaas - but knowing you, you could have with just a few mouse clicks and a remote paint brush!


 :lol:  :lol:

But in all seriousness, I would never alter a photo or screen capture of any of these videos other than to change the brightness or contrast to see a dark area better.


Just so were clear;  I was not at all implying YOU doctored the image Klass.  Perhaps I should have been more clear.  What it looked like to me was that the shadow or blackened area appears to extend beyond the top of the rock formation.  There does not appear to be a physical object behind the top of the shadow ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:11:56 AM
Grande - I know you weren't implying I'd alter it, lol  :lol:

Just on the back side of that rock formation is where the guy was laying out the tarp getting ready to cut it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 12, 2006, 12:14:19 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Klaas!  That's the picture we all dream of!  But ...  but  ...  but  .... where's Freddy?  He's got to tell the truth!

Freddy is in the shower picking up the soap  :lol:


^5 Klaas  ROFL!!!!!!!!!!  
caught up reading and I busted with your post!
Have a great night all.. see Lalas hugged Nemo.  but since
she pays me to do it. HUGS again! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:15:51 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Klaas!  That's the picture we all dream of!  But ...  but  ...  but  .... where's Freddy?  He's got to tell the truth!

Freddy is in the shower picking up the soap  :lol:


^5 Klaas  ROFL!!!!!!!!!!  
caught up reading and I busted with your post!
Have a great night all.. see Lalas hugged Nemo.  but since
she pays me to do it. HUGS again! :wink:

Hi and goodnight! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 12, 2006, 12:16:00 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kat_Gram just posted this on the front page of SM.  I nominate it as the post of the day!!

I would like to suggest that ” something bad happened ”
the day Joran was born.


Yeah The devils Spawn, I bet if we shaved his head we would find 3 666
in the form of a triangle also

And I accept the award  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:16:35 AM
(http://i15.tinypic.com/2ivybty.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:22:44 AM
Sorry for the multiple posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:24:28 AM
BRIGHTNESS INCREASED +45

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockShadow.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:27:03 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - I know you weren't implying I'd alter it, lol  :lol:

Just on the back side of that rock formation is where the guy was laying out the tarp getting ready to cut it.


Great!  Im grateful to have your support in this.  Working on yet another source WITHIN!  :shock: CROSS YOUR FINGERS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:27:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaChainGang.jpg)

Note, the above photo is doctored, lol :lol:  :lol:


a picture is worth 1000 words

how true

i hate  them all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:31:59 AM
“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.
J. van der STRATEN (signed by Jan VDS)


ok, im not a rocket scientist....
but it appears to me that according to SLIME MASTER JORAN he says
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut"

so, he is admitting something was buried...

see what i mean

if some one DID NOT know anything. the logical response would be
"buried ??  buried what ???  we didnt bury anything"

im sorrry but ALE has lost, misplaces, burned or thrown away some of this statement......it is missing IMPORTANT other bits

i hate them all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:32:51 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
BRIGHTNESS INCREASED +45

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockShadow.jpg)


Because it is really irrelevant in the whole scheme of things, I am just going to rule out potential manipulation with the videos.  I will leave that speculation to the conspiracy theorists, although I certainly would not rule it out.   Frankly, it's just not the most productive thing I could be doing with my time, no offense to anyone else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:36:16 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - I know you weren't implying I'd alter it, lol  :lol:

Just on the back side of that rock formation is where the guy was laying out the tarp getting ready to cut it.


Great!  Im grateful to have your support in this.  Working on yet another source WITHIN!  :shock: CROSS YOUR FINGERS!

Excellent news!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:36:56 AM
Quote from: "robots"
“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.
J. van der STRATEN (signed by Jan VDS)


ok, im not a rocket scientist....
but it appears to me that according to SLIME MASTER JORAN he says
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut"

so, he is admitting something was buried...

see what i mean

if some one DID NOT know anything. the logical response would be
"buried ??  buried what ???  we didnt bury anything"

im sorrry but ALE has lost, misplaces, burned or thrown away some of this statement......it is missing IMPORTANT other bits

i hate them all


Robot...

Im with you on that!  What is the date of that statement?  That could be the most prominent / revealing statement of all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 12:37:26 AM
Hi, Robots!

And remember that is the odd statement that is really one by Jan van derstraaten as he does not appear to even ask for Joran to sign it.  At the beginning he states it was taken June 13 and yet he signs it June 17.  AND this is immediately after Uncle Jan got his power back from Dompig over the weekend when Dompig announced someone confessed and all that.

How odd to take a statement June 13 and not sign it until June 17??

And Rammstein at BFN assures us that these are canine dogs and not the human kind.  Did the Kalpoes have dogs?  

How odd Uncle Jan just lets it slide.  If Joran said Deepak came back with two giraffes I guess Uncle Jan would not have found anything odd about that either.

 :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:38:17 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.
J. van der STRATEN (signed by Jan VDS)


ok, im not a rocket scientist....
but it appears to me that according to SLIME MASTER JORAN he says
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut"

so, he is admitting something was buried...

see what i mean

if some one DID NOT know anything. the logical response would be
"buried ??  buried what ???  we didnt bury anything"

im sorrry but ALE has lost, misplaces, burned or thrown away some of this statement......it is missing IMPORTANT other bits

i hate them all


Robot...

Im with you on that!  What is the date of that statement?  That could be the most prominent / revealing statement of all.



yep. when you think about it
JORAN THE SLUG, never denies anything being buried

hmmm,,,,, we need to more disecting of this

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:39:12 AM
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:39:44 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Hi, Robots!

And remember that is the odd statement that is really one by Jan van derstraaten as he does not appear to even ask for Joran to sign it.  At the beginning he states it was taken June 13 and yet he signs it June 17.  AND this is immediately after Uncle Jan got his power back from Dompig over the weekend when Dompig announced someone confessed and all that.

How odd to take a statement June 13 and not sign it until June 17??

And Rammstein at BFN assures us that these are canine dogs and not the human kind.  Did the Kalpoes have dogs?  

How odd Uncle Jan just lets it slide.  If Joran said Deepak came back with two giraffes I guess Uncle Jan would not have found anything odd about that either.

 :evil:


hi Anna
yes, you are correct

everytime i see you i smile because of the pciture of the dog with a dress on  8)  
for some reason i find that to be hilarious  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:41:34 AM
To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”


BOMBSHELL

why didnt the FREAKING ALE ask "how do you know it was buried ?"


what a bunch of *($&*%&*$&%(*$&(%*$(%^)$#^  jerks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:43:55 AM
HE IS SAYING IT WAS buried

and then it says To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”


THEN,,,,,,,how many times was she buried

HUH ????????????????????
answer the FREAKING QUETSTION


HUH ????????????????????????????? JORAN ??????????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:44:47 AM
and yet Greta is inclined to believe him

 :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 12, 2006, 12:45:23 AM
WHO SAID THEY WERE "WITNESSES"?

This is the vulnerable point of the coverup.

Whoever it was who signed the offical papers identifying and accepting the 3 as WITNESSES is profoundly available for heavy interrogation and prosecution.

WHose name is on that paper?  Who "classified" the 3 as "witnesses" instead of "suspects"?

GIVE ME THE NAME


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:45:49 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
BRIGHTNESS INCREASED +45

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/RockShadow.jpg)


Because it is really irrelevant in the whole scheme of things, I am just going to rule out potential manipulation with the videos.  I will leave that speculation to the conspiracy theorists, although I certainly would not rule it out.   Frankly, it's just not the most productive thing I could be doing with my time, no offense to anyone else.


LMAO, If that's not a contradiction...  'going to rule it out' / 'certainly would not rule it out".  The preceding S/B... going to disregard it, for the time being

LOL somebody slap me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:46:17 AM
During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.


CRIED ???????????????????????????????????????????

why you cry to momma ???

i thought you were innocent


nobody cries when they didnt do anything wrong


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 12:47:51 AM
.
Yes, if burying was required, it could be assumed something very bad had happened but I still wonder how these kids would have the kind of confidence to decide if a person was really and truly deceased.  It can be very hard to tell and that goes to not an accident theory.

It goes round and round until we are all dizzy and exhausted but then that's the idea.

But some things never change.  Those last seen with Natalee and the fact that they lied repeatedly.

And yes, de Vries is very handsome.  He also appears to be upsetting those in many quarters most especially Sloots and their supporters.

 :lol:  :D  :lol:  :D  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 12, 2006, 12:48:28 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Ok I the June 17th threw me for a loop.  

I am almost certain June 13th is the day they searched Arashi Beach.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:50:16 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WHO SAID THEY WERE "WITNESSES"?

This is the vulnerable point of the coverup.

Whoever it was who signed the offical papers identifying and accepting the 3 as WITNESSES is profoundly available for heavy interrogation and prosecution.

WHose name is on that paper?  Who "classified" the 3 as "witnesses" instead of "suspects"?

GIVE ME THE NAME

The PROSECUTOR determines who is a witness and who is a suspect.  Karen Janssen would have to be the person signing the official papers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:52:17 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Ok I the June 17th threw me for a loop.  

I am almost certain June 13th is the day they searched Arashi Beach.

Van der Straaten's informal meeting with Joran was on June 13th and Van der Straaten filed his report on June 17th.  Probably needed time to advise Paulus what to do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:52:59 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Ok I the June 17th threw me for a loop.  

I am almost certain June 13th is the day they searched Arashi Beach.

Van der Straaten's informal meeting with Joran was on June 13th and Van der Straaten filed his report on June 17th.  Probably needed time to advise Paulus what to do.


B
I
N
G
O


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 12:56:50 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Ok I the June 17th threw me for a loop.  

I am almost certain June 13th is the day they searched Arashi Beach.

Van der Straaten's informal meeting with Joran was on June 13th and Van der Straaten filed his report on June 17th.  Probably needed time to advise Paulus what to do.


B
I
N
G
O



Well, I would guess the other way around.  Paulus read and tore up the first draft and had them retype it more in keeping with his and the Cowgirl's liking.  

I may be wrong but I see Paulus as being more on top of things than vdStraaten because I think Paulus is very controlling and would not trust anybody else except to follow his orders.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 12:57:43 AM
Anna - that's very possible too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 12:58:30 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Ok I the June 17th threw me for a loop.  

I am almost certain June 13th is the day they searched Arashi Beach.

Van der Straaten's informal meeting with Joran was on June 13th and Van der Straaten filed his report on June 17th.  Probably needed time to advise Paulus what to do.


B
I
N
G
O



Well, I would guess the other way around.  Paulus read and tore up the first draft and had them retype it more in keeping with his and the Cowgirl's liking.  

I may be wrong but I see Paulus as being more on top of things than vdStraaten because I think Paulus is very controlling and would not trust anybody else except to follow his orders.

.


either way

paulus had some serious input
and the result is the same

i agree paulus the insecure sweat hog is a control type  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 12:59:36 AM
.
Anyone else think ALE packed up all that stuff and sent it to the Big Black Hole in Holland to prevent deVries having access to any of it??

 :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 01:00:47 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Anyone else think ALE packed up all that stuff and sent it to the Big Black Hole in Holland to prevent deVries having access to any of it??

 :evil:



absolutely


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 12, 2006, 01:01:04 AM
You Think Jannsen Signed The Papers ID-ing the 3 as WITNESSES?

Then she's integral to the coverup.

WHoever "officially" ID-d the 3 as "witnesses" should be prosecuted for failure to perform and obstruction.

It's quite simple, really.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 01:01:09 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Anyone else think ALE packed up all that stuff and sent it to the Big Black Hole in Holland to prevent deVries having access to any of it??

 :evil:


Maybe when he gets back to The Netherlands, they will ship it all back to Aruba.

Sort of like Joran.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:01:43 AM
HAMMER - she may have been taking orders from someone, or under pressure, but the prosecutor is the one who decides if someone is a witness or suspect:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/KarenJ.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:02:56 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
You Think Jannsen Signed The Papers ID-ing the 3 as WITNESSES?

Then she's integral to the coverup.

WHoever "officially" ID-d the 3 as "witnesses" should be prosecuted for failure to perform and obstruction.

It's quite simple, really.

.


HAMMER - this goes back to your original forum question in June 2005.  YES, KJ had to sign the papers per Aruban law.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 12, 2006, 01:08:08 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WHO SAID THEY WERE "WITNESSES"?

This is the vulnerable point of the coverup.

Whoever it was who signed the offical papers identifying and accepting the 3 as WITNESSES is profoundly available for heavy interrogation and prosecution.

WHose name is on that paper?  Who "classified" the 3 as "witnesses" instead of "suspects"?

GIVE ME THE NAME

The PROSECUTOR determines who is a witness and who is a suspect.  Karen Janssen would have to be the person signing the official papers.


I thought Janssen classified them as suspects....
From June 15, 2005:

The three suspects already in custody, Joran Van Der Sloot, 17, and brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 21, and Satish Kalpoe, 18, are in court this morning before judge Bob Wit, who will decide, probably later this afternoon, whether they will remain in jail. They were arrested June 9.
<snip>
Aruba Attorney General Caren Janssen asked Wit Thursday to detain for eight more days the three youths already jailed as suspects.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 01:11:01 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
HAMMER - she may have been taking orders from someone, or under pressure, but the prosecutor is the one who decides if someone is a witness or suspect:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/KarenJ.jpg)



Would that be the same Karin Janssen whose replacement is rumored to already be on the island because she is retiring?

The one who couldn't think of ANY reason for the boys to lie about the HI drop off that arrested the SG knowing j2K lied?

The one who said Paulus wouldn't let them search his house?

The one who had to have approved that laughable let's tap their phones and don't take any forensics scheme?

The one who threatened Jug to stop the investigation if he didn't act nice?

The one who made the nasty antiAmerican remark about going in like cowboys?

The one who told Greta to move back from her car so that she wouldn't hurt her?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:11:24 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WHO SAID THEY WERE "WITNESSES"?

This is the vulnerable point of the coverup.

Whoever it was who signed the offical papers identifying and accepting the 3 as WITNESSES is profoundly available for heavy interrogation and prosecution.

WHose name is on that paper?  Who "classified" the 3 as "witnesses" instead of "suspects"?

GIVE ME THE NAME

The PROSECUTOR determines who is a witness and who is a suspect.  Karen Janssen would have to be the person signing the official papers.


I thought Janssen classified them as suspects....
From June 15, 2005:

The three suspects already in custody, Joran Van Der Sloot, 17, and brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 21, and Satish Kalpoe, 18, are in court this morning before judge Bob Wit, who will decide, probably later this afternoon, whether they will remain in jail. They were arrested June 9.
<snip>
Aruba Attorney General Caren Janssen asked Wit Thursday to detain for eight more days the three youths already jailed as suspects.

They were originally interviewed as witnesses on May 31, 2005.  So on May 31, 2005 they were witnesses.  KJ reclassified them as suspects on June 9th when they were detained.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:14:12 AM
PROCES - VERBAAL

We, Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY, head agent and sergeant at the Korps Police Force Aruba, firstly called classified at the Atraco team last mentioned district 2, explain the following at the section to multi-prevention crime classified.

On Tuesday, 31 May 2005, around 15.30 interrogated and took a witness statement from the man named:

Deepak Sharma KALPOE

PROCES – VERBAAL

I, Dennis Dominico JACOBS, head agent at the Korps Police force Aruba and at the Atraco team classified, explain the following.

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 19:20, I interrogated and took a witness statement from the man named:

Satish Sharma KALPOE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 12, 2006, 01:16:42 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
They were originally interviewed as witnesses on May 31, 2005.  So on May 31, 2005 they were witnesses.  KJ reclassified them as suspects on June 9th when they were detained.


I agree with that.  Originally witnesses, then reclassified as suspects.

Hammer - IMO, the vunerable part is the whole first 9 days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:18:39 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
They were originally interviewed as witnesses on May 31, 2005.  So on May 31, 2005 they were witnesses.  KJ reclassified them as suspects on June 9th when they were detained.


I agree with that.  Originally witnesses, then reclassified as suspects.

Hammer - IMO, the vunerable part is the whole first 9 days.

Precisely!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 12, 2006, 01:28:38 AM
WASN'T JANSSEN FLOWN IN FROM HOLLAND?

I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that Janssen was flown in early from Holland to manage the case.  Can anyone confirm?

As indicated above from Klaas, on May 31, 2005, Deepak was providing a WITNESS statement, taken by Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

Whatdayaknow?  FAT BOY DENNIS JACOBS, right in the middle of the action.

This is one of the doors in, and more importantly, "the way in".

Failure to perfrom, obstruction, assisting in an attempted coverup.  It was the FAT BOY who handed the papers to patsy Janssen.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:32:02 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WASN'T JANSSEN FLOWN IN FROM HOLLAND?

I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that Janssen was flown in early from Holland to manage the case.  Can anyone confirm?

As indicated above from Klaas, on May 31, 2005, Deepak was providing a WITNESS statement, taken by Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

Whatdayaknow?  FAT BOY DENNIS JACOBS, right in the middle of the action.

This is one of the doors in, and more importantly, "the way in".

Failure to perfrom, obstruction, assisting in an attempted coverup.  It was the FAT BOY who handed the papers to patsy Janssen.

.

Hammer - no, I don't think she was brought in for the case..think she was already working in Aruba.  Yep, Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 12, 2006, 01:43:53 AM
"Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO"

Yep.  Right as rain.

He's interviewing Deepak as a WITNESS on May 31, 2005.  The pathetic LE appartus in Aruba is grinding into motion.  The clowns will execute "missing tourist drill" and go through the motions so "family can be satisfied" that "everything possible" was done.

Not this time, FAT BOY.

Who is dirtbag accomplice: Shaniro Baldrik KELLY?  Do we have this clown's picture?

Nice work, kids.

How does it feel knowing that your expert coverup job has been dismantled in cyberspace, and that all we need is an investigative reporter w/ some brass and protection to nail your asses?

Joran Van der Sloot is a serial rapist.  And a murderer.  He should be in jail for the rest of his life.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 01:45:08 AM
Hammer - we don't have his picture yet but I'll see if I can dig one up. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 12, 2006, 01:49:25 AM
I Don't Want "The First 9 Days"...

I want the first 48 hours.

The witness statement of deepak was taken by Jacobs and Kelly within 48 hours of Natalee going missing.

That's the place to start.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 12, 2006, 01:55:04 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
"Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO"

Yep.  Right as rain.

He's interviewing Deepak as a WITNESS on May 31, 2005.  The pathetic LE appartus in Aruba is grinding into motion.  The clowns will execute "missing tourist drill" and go through the motions so "family can be satisfied" that "everything possible" was done.

Not this time, FAT BOY.

Who is dirtbag accomplice: Shaniro Baldrik KELLY?  Do we have this clown's picture?

Nice work, kids.

How does it feel knowing that your expert coverup job has been dismantled in cyberspace, and that all we need is an investigative reporter w/ some brass and protection to nail your asses?

Joran Van der Sloot is a serial rapist.  And a murderer.  He should be in jail for the rest of his life.

.


go hammer go !!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 02:00:07 AM
SHANIRO KELLY:

(http://www.boostunit.com/sc/uploads/viejo_shan.jpg)

http://tinyurl.com/yaq55y

He's also here but I can't tell which one he is yet:

http://tinyurl.com/ybpwcv


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 02:04:41 AM
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Van der Straaten/Jacobs or Janssen?

It's a totally concerted effort.  Without each link in place, it would not have worked.  Each did their little part and contributed.  Art Woods' term professional cover up would apply.

All parties are well versed in how to scam the tourists.  They had the missing Max deVries to practice on for selling the insurance scam routine that seemed to work pretty well for them.

I do think those involved in this thought themselves pretty untouchable and their island invincible.  No one would boycott because the major hotels are owned by American companies, etc. and they have no concept of consumer rights or grassroots boycott and thought they would just jerk the family around until they went away.

And they still don't get it and think themselves the aggrieved parties.  Pathetic.

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 02:07:43 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Van der Straaten/Jacobs or Janssen?

It's a totally concerted effort.  Without each link in place, it would not have worked.  Each did their little part and contributed.  Art Woods' term professional cover up would apply.

All parties are well versed in how to scam the tourists.  They had the missing Max deVries to practice on for selling the insurance scam routine that seemed to work pretty well for them.

I do think those involved in this thought themselves pretty untouchable and their island invincible.  No one would boycott because the major hotels are owned by American companies, etc. and they have no concept of consumer rights or grassroots boycott and thought they would just jerk the family around until they went away.

And they still don't get it and think themselves the aggrieved parties.  Pathetic.

.

.

Different roles.  If working per the Aruban law, Van der Stratten and Jacobs would actully take orders from KJ as far as who to bring in as a witness or suspect.  KJ also is the one who presents the documents to the judge.  Anyone want to guess if KJ neglected to give the judge some of the information?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 02:09:15 AM
So Deepak and Satish went in alone and made their original witness statements.

Joran was taken by Paulus who did not let him out of his sight basically.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 02:12:47 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[Different roles.  If working per the Aruban law, Van der Stratten and Jacobs would actully take orders from KJ as far as who to bring in as a witness or suspect.  KJ also is the one who presents the documents to the judge.  Anyone want to guess if KJ neglected to give the judge some of the information?



This so concerned Dave Holloway that he made a trip to see that they were all on the same page.  When they are not on the same page by design, that is hard to address.

Yes, I would love to see what the judges were shown and what they were not and the conclusions they reached as a result.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 02:15:32 AM
Anna - hate to leave you all alone here but I need to call it a night.  I don't know how you "late nite Monkeys" do it, lol  :lol:

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 12, 2006, 02:42:35 AM
You are informing me that when I was first interviewed as a witness that I told the detective that Natalee and me got out of the car close to/near Fisherman's Hut and walked in the sea.
To your question as to what I can state about that, I answer you that I did not say that. It also isn't in my witness statement.

We have never seen this witness statement . In this statement, he says they dropped her off at the HI.
I think they did look at Arashi Beach June 2, I will try to find it. I also think they looked there because this is where Deepak stopped to relieve himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 03:17:44 AM
Quote from: "robots"
and yet Greta is inclined to believe him

 :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Always look for the truth within the lies.  For example:  

something was buried, but not near the huts
something was buried, but not near the huts or by Deepak
nothing was buried, but we were near the huts
nothing was buried, but we were near the huts and Deepak wasn't there

See?  Simple.  :?  Now, I'm going to go take an aspirin.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 03:24:10 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[Different roles.  If working per the Aruban law, Van der Stratten and Jacobs would actully take orders from KJ as far as who to bring in as a witness or suspect.  KJ also is the one who presents the documents to the judge.  Anyone want to guess if KJ neglected to give the judge some of the information?



This so concerned Dave Holloway that he made a trip to see that they were all on the same page.  When they are not on the same page by design, that is hard to address.

Yes, I would love to see what the judges were shown and what they were not and the conclusions they reached as a result.

.


I want to guess Klaas!  I guess YES.  Do I win?  

Anna, we'd all like to see what the Judges were given in this debacle.  I think there was an incriminating statement given to the Judge which he declared was not believable and tossed it.  I'd also like to see the details of what information was collected on the cell phones, computers and whereabouts of J2K during the 9 days Joran was given to finish school and Paulus was given to clean up.  I'd like to see whatever request was given to a judge to search the vds property.  Mostly, I'd like to see Aruba nuked.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on November 12, 2006, 04:54:00 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WASN'T JANSSEN FLOWN IN FROM HOLLAND?

I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that Janssen was flown in early from Holland to manage the case.  Can anyone confirm?

As indicated above from Klaas, on May 31, 2005, Deepak was providing a WITNESS statement, taken by Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

Whatdayaknow?  FAT BOY DENNIS JACOBS, right in the middle of the action.

This is one of the doors in, and more importantly, "the way in".

Failure to perfrom, obstruction, assisting in an attempted coverup.  It was the FAT BOY who handed the papers to patsy Janssen.

.

Hammer - no, I don't think she was brought in for the case..think she was already working in Aruba.  Yep, Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO.


Klaas my memory is that she was brought in. I could be wrong. But I don't think she was already in Aruba. I remember her being brought in. Fuzzy memory though. :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on November 12, 2006, 05:20:18 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WASN'T JANSSEN FLOWN IN FROM HOLLAND?

I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that Janssen was flown in early from Holland to manage the case.  Can anyone confirm?

As indicated above from Klaas, on May 31, 2005, Deepak was providing a WITNESS statement, taken by Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

Whatdayaknow?  FAT BOY DENNIS JACOBS, right in the middle of the action.

This is one of the doors in, and more importantly, "the way in".

Failure to perfrom, obstruction, assisting in an attempted coverup.  It was the FAT BOY who handed the papers to patsy Janssen.

.

Hammer - no, I don't think she was brought in for the case..think she was already working in Aruba.  Yep, Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO.


Klaas my memory is that she was brought in. I could be wrong. But I don't think she was already in Aruba. I remember her being brought in. Fuzzy memory though. :?


After thinking about this maybe it was because we didn't hear about her until later and that's why I "remember" her being brought in later... :?  I don't know...I'm still leaning towards her being brought in later....ok I think it's because I "understood their laws" at that time was something about it being her "rotation" to come to Aruba...that the Dutch lawyers  were on a rotation to come to Aruba ("vacation") and they "chose" her to come at the time because she was supposed to be a hot shot at the time...does anyone remeber this or am I crazy? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 12, 2006, 07:55:36 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
I want the first 48 hours.


We know Janssen was on the scene by 6/5, being pictured along with VDStraten at the cowboy raid of the SG residence. Before that i do not know. I find it hard to believe that Janssen was already named prosecuter of this case at the time of the 5/31 *witness* interviews.

Did VDStraten pull out the 48hr rule to keep the Prosecuter's office out of the loop? We know he was preventing organized searches...AND meeting with Paulus during the first 48hrs. And now the MOJ is accussing VDStraten of innappropriate phone calls during the first weeks of June 05?

I will look for Janssen info, maybe she has quotes before 6/5. But i think it will all lead back to the dirty duo of Jacobs and VDStratten.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 12, 2006, 08:43:41 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"

Yep  :wink:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/peter_r_de_vries_29347h.jpg)



I wouldnt kick him out of the monkey cage for eating crackers :wink:


Sue, if this man was in the cage with us girlie monkeys, we wouldn't be serving up crackers.   :wink:  :shock:  :wink:[/quote]

I wouldn't even care if he could form a full sentence.  

I hope he is as successful in his present endeavor as he is handsome.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 12, 2006, 09:00:42 AM
Janssen had been working in Aruba for a couple of years at the time of Nat's disappearance. She had worked with Paulus, remember?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 12, 2006, 09:03:46 AM
Good morning.

I thought I read somewhere that the rotation is 3 years and Karin's 3  years is up.  Just because her name didn't come up from the start like the suspects' doesn't mean she wasn't in it up to her eyeballs.  Too much depended on her integrity and it seems she failed miserably.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 09:13:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SHANIRO KELLY:

(http://www.boostunit.com/sc/uploads/viejo_shan.jpg)

http://tinyurl.com/yaq55y

He's also here but I can't tell which one he is yet:

http://tinyurl.com/ybpwcv

Just taking a guess here.  The guy in the car has a red shirt on with a white emblem on the right arm and so does the guy in the picture below:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Kelly.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 12, 2006, 10:04:01 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
I Don't Want "The First 9 Days"...

I want the first 48 hours.

The witness statement of deepak was taken by Jacobs and Kelly within 48 hours of Natalee going missing.

That's the place to start.

.


Sorry Hammer - You are right, it starts with the first 48 hours.  But I still want the whole first 9 days.  Knowing what happened on the 3rd day may help us figure out the first 48 hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 10:12:50 AM
The Holloway/Twitty entourage left the VDS residence early 5/31.  They had been in the company of ALE from Noord station.  

Refresh my memory as to why 2K gave withness statements at Bubali later that day.  Are Jacobs & Kelly associated with more than one precinct, or station house?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 10:17:41 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
So Deepak and Satish went in alone and made their original witness statements.

Joran was taken by Paulus who did not let him out of his sight basically.

Bingo Anna.  Paulus would never leave Joran alone unless it was with someone he trusted.  I am still going to say that Paulus never went to work that Monday just like Joran never went to school.  They had meetings with Van der Straaten or someone else in command to see what the game plan would be.  Paulus was too frightened that Joran would slip up and the one who would pay would be Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:20:56 AM
Quote from: "shadow"
Question: Regarding the statement by Joran that D showed up with 2 dogs, was this statement made before or after the bloody mattress declared to be covered in canine blood was found?? Anyone know?


After. In the beginning, we had a bloody mattress and two security guards, a drop off at the Holiday Inn.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 10:21:15 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The Holloway/Twitty entourage left the VDS residence early 5/31.  They had been in the company of ALE from Noord station.  

Refresh my memory as to why 2K gave withness statements at Bubali later that day.  Are Jacobs & Kelly associated with more than one precinct, or station house?

At this point I don't think it matters where they are stationed.  They are on Red alert just in case one of the family members arrives at one of these stations.  They have a man in place at each station to throw the Holloway/Twitty off to give them more time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:22:29 AM
Quote from: "shadow"
Because I'm wondering if the statement was made to deflect attention from and cast suspicion on Deepak as opposed to an actual statement of truth.


Of course, it was but do you not find the statement about two dogs interesting?  I think there is something about dogs and this murder of Natalee that needs investigating and the "two dogs" might be Julia and Angela, for all we know.  I would bet,  in private, that is what they are called by locals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 10:24:51 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "shadow"
Because I'm wondering if the statement was made to deflect attention from and cast suspicion on Deepak as opposed to an actual statement of truth.


Of course, it was but do you not find the statement about two dogs interesting?  I think there is something about dogs and this murder of Natalee that needs investigating and the "two dogs" might be Julia and Angela, for all we know.  I would bet,  in private, that is what they are called by locals.

They are two dogs Tyler.  I don't have to bet I just say it.  These two women along with Anita are the scum of the earth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:25:01 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaChainGang.jpg)

Note, the above photo is doctored, lol :lol:  :lol:


At the top of my CHRISTMAS WISH LIST.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:26:11 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Klaas!  That's the picture we all dream of!  But ...  but  ...  but  .... where's Freddy?  He's got to tell the truth!

Freddy is in the shower picking up the soap  :lol:


and his friends from Aruba right there ready to tighten the screws. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 12, 2006, 10:27:35 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
SHANIRO KELLY:

(http://www.boostunit.com/sc/uploads/viejo_shan.jpg)

http://tinyurl.com/yaq55y

He's also here but I can't tell which one he is yet:

http://tinyurl.com/ybpwcv

Just taking a guess here.  The guy in the car has a red shirt on with a white emblem on the right arm and so does the guy in the picture below:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Kelly.jpg)


I agree, same facial structure..
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Shaniro.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:30:19 AM
Quote from: "robots"
“I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

Joran also indicated that he was very sorry for his family and that he had the best contact with his father.

When I asked him why did he lie to his father about the Holiday Inn, Joran answered that he had disappointed his father in/with that.

Of this I reported on my oath as officer on June 17th 2005.
J. van der STRATEN (signed by Jan VDS)


ok, im not a rocket scientist....
but it appears to me that according to SLIME MASTER JORAN he says
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut"

so, he is admitting something was buried...

see what i mean

if some one DID NOT know anything. the logical response would be
"buried ??  buried what ???  we didnt bury anything"

im sorrry but ALE has lost, misplaces, burned or thrown away some of this statement......it is missing IMPORTANT other bits

i hate them all


That makes a growing group of us, Robots.  What makes me hate is what they did to Natalee and moreover the lies and coverups perpetuated by these lackeys like frizzy Renfro and fat Angela.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:32:27 AM
Quote from: "robots"
To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”


BOMBSHELL

why didnt the FREAKING ALE ask "how do you know it was buried ?"


what a bunch of *($&*%&*$&%(*$&(%*$(%^)$#^  jerks


He knows but he knows this is not the place and the reason he knows is because Paulus told him where she was "relocated" by the bifrons paid by Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:33:33 AM
Quote from: "robots"
and yet Greta is inclined to believe him

 :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Remember if you will, Greta believed Bill Clinton when he said he never had sex with that woman and OJ Simpson when he said he was looking for Nicole's killers.  Greta and her husband are parasites on the back of prosperity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 10:35:31 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The Holloway/Twitty entourage left the VDS residence early 5/31.  They had been in the company of ALE from Noord station.  

Refresh my memory as to why 2K gave withness statements at Bubali later that day.  Are Jacobs & Kelly associated with more than one precinct, or station house?

At this point I don't think it matters where they are stationed.  They are on Red alert just in case one of the family members arrives at one of these stations.  They have a man in place at each station to throw the Holloway/Twitty off to give them more time.


You've touched upon my thinking, here.  The HI lie was in place at this point, and the Holloway/Twitty group had already made noise at the Noord station, which I had had the impression Jacobs & Kelly were associated.  Taking the statements at Bubali can be perceived as a diversion, absolutely, especially since ALE claimed no knowledge of a missing girl, and the missing report was delayed at least to this point.  

Dave Holloway arrived 6/1, IIRC, and was told by Jacobs to go have a beer at CnC on or about that date.  Thought it was at Noord station....

I'm just looking at these occurances just as we've looked at the statements, and considering Hammer's question about the 1st 48 hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 12, 2006, 10:37:05 AM
On the Tuesday, Van Der Stratten went to Paulus's  work and told him to take Joran to the police station at Bulbai. So, a statement was made on the Tuesday in Paulus's presence.  Then Wednesday, Satish and Deepak went to the Racquet Club and gave Joran the details of the HI drop off because they had already done a drive thru with the police. Because Joran was under 18 at the time, Paulus was allowed to be present on the Tuesday.
The police never looked in the obvious direction of Deepak, Satish and Joran until the Security Guards came up with alibis.
As far as Karin Janssen is is concerned, she signed the arrest warrants for the guards. Her information comes from the police. Did she do anything in this case ? She could not get a search warrant ( or did she try ) for the VDS compound and every one of her presentations in court seems to have fallen flat.
I hope that DeVries looks into the relationships between these people, the Sloots, Jacobs, Jan VanDer , Janssen before any of this happened.
And if there is any dirt, really good dirt, I want to hear it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 12, 2006, 10:41:21 AM
Not the first 48 hrs.  But what I find interesting is everything that happened the 9th-10th.  Family informed of death, Joran in his only tearful pose.  Didn't Art Wood (on Dana??) say something about a confession then by Monday (June 13th), it had all changed?? We now see the "discussion" signed by J VanderStratten involved with Joran on the 13th.  Where is Joran's real statement from the 9th-10th?? Was that the one torn up on the desk??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:41:25 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Yes, if burying was required, it could be assumed something very bad had happened but I still wonder how these kids would have the kind of confidence to decide if a person was really and truly deceased.  It can be very hard to tell and that goes to not an accident theory.

It goes round and round until we are all dizzy and exhausted but then that's the idea.

But some things never change.  Those last seen with Natalee and the fact that they lied repeatedly.

And yes, de Vries is very handsome.  He also appears to be upsetting those in many quarters most especially Sloots and their supporters.

 :lol:  :D  :lol:  :D  :lol:


I think Paulus was assured she was dead, perhaps by his "doctor friend" at the hospital where he was paid for quality assurance/quality control.  He had the upper hand on the doctors there.  He knew what side his beread was buttered on and he used it to the full extent.  If Natalee was not dead, he would assure she was.  Why else was he lurking certain sites on his computer within hours of Natalee leaving C&C with his spawn of Satan son.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:42:10 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - that statement was taken on June 13th, 2005


Ok I the June 17th threw me for a loop.  

I am almost certain June 13th is the day they searched Arashi Beach.

Van der Straaten's informal meeting with Joran was on June 13th and Van der Straaten filed his report on June 17th.  Probably needed time to advise Paulus what to do.


Advice and consent in its purest form.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:44:31 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Anyone else think ALE packed up all that stuff and sent it to the Big Black Hole in Holland to prevent deVries having access to any of it??

 :evil:


I think all the evidence that was worthy of being called evidence was put into the incinerator at the oil refinery.  Anything that did not make its way there seemed to get into the hands of someone who paid for it and it is too bad the price was so high, or we would have more evidence; albeit to no benefit except to satisfy our curiosity but we all know that Joran & K2 are ultimately responsible and Paulus is involved as well as Freddy, Gudio and JR and the slugs that are employed by her and those who employ her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:46:25 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
HAMMER - she may have been taking orders from someone, or under pressure, but the prosecutor is the one who decides if someone is a witness or suspect:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/KarenJ.jpg)



Would that be the same Karin Janssen whose replacement is rumored to already be on the island because she is retiring?

The one who couldn't think of ANY reason for the boys to lie about the HI drop off that arrested the SG knowing j2K lied?

The one who said Paulus wouldn't let them search his house?

The one who had to have approved that laughable let's tap their phones and don't take any forensics scheme?

The one who threatened Jug to stop the investigation if he didn't act nice?

The one who made the nasty antiAmerican remark about going in like cowboys?

The one who told Greta to move back from her car so that she wouldn't hurt her?


Or the same one who went in like renegades and arrested Johns and Jones


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:51:03 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WASN'T JANSSEN FLOWN IN FROM HOLLAND?

I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that Janssen was flown in early from Holland to manage the case.  Can anyone confirm?

As indicated above from Klaas, on May 31, 2005, Deepak was providing a WITNESS statement, taken by Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

Whatdayaknow?  FAT BOY DENNIS JACOBS, right in the middle of the action.

This is one of the doors in, and more importantly, "the way in".

Failure to perfrom, obstruction, assisting in an attempted coverup.  It was the FAT BOY who handed the papers to patsy Janssen.

.

Hammer - no, I don't think she was brought in for the case..think she was already working in Aruba.  Yep, Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO.


Her globe-trotting seemed to be ongoing and she may have been flown in since she had been in Holland doing some lectures on drugs and how to control them.  She also went back to Holland to take evidence that was lost in flight or evaporated when the plane's altitude reached penthouse levels.  I was told by someone who knew she was "hankering" for a job at the Hague and had been working toward such at the time, and during the Holloway case which was not considered large in the overall scheme of things nor did its resolution contribute to the greater good, which is the Hague's only interest, "the greater good," (as in freeing Saddam, Milosovic and embracing that former kooky Ramsey Clark), she was traveling to and fro at the time writing articles and speaking at universities, the Hague, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 12, 2006, 10:52:28 AM
morning monkeys. Msmarple: thanks for finding & posting the statement regarding the mattress and the dates. Just caught up reading from last nights discussion and really like seeing all this good thinking/detective work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:52:35 AM
Yikes, I meant to say our former attorney general, Ramsey Clark, who worked for the nut case peanut farmer, president Carter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:54:23 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
They were originally interviewed as witnesses on May 31, 2005.  So on May 31, 2005 they were witnesses.  KJ reclassified them as suspects on June 9th when they were detained.


I agree with that.  Originally witnesses, then reclassified as suspects.

Hammer - IMO, the vunerable part is the whole first 9 days.


Simply put, Sleuth, I think the case was closed before it began, May 31, once Paulus knew.  It was done and dead, just like Natalee, perhaps before she even drew her last breath.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 10:54:52 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The Holloway/Twitty entourage left the VDS residence early 5/31.  They had been in the company of ALE from Noord station.  

Refresh my memory as to why 2K gave withness statements at Bubali later that day.  Are Jacobs & Kelly associated with more than one precinct, or station house?

At this point I don't think it matters where they are stationed.  They are on Red alert just in case one of the family members arrives at one of these stations.  They have a man in place at each station to throw the Holloway/Twitty off to give them more time.


You've touched upon my thinking, here.  The HI lie was in place at this point, and the Holloway/Twitty group had already made noise at the Noord station, which I had had the impression Jacobs & Kelly were associated.  Taking the statements at Bubali can be perceived as a diversion, absolutely, especially since ALE claimed no knowledge of a missing girl, and the missing report was delayed at least to this point.  

Dave Holloway arrived 6/1, IIRC, and was told by Jacobs to go have a beer at CnC on or about that date.  Thought it was at Noord station....

I'm just looking at these occurances just as we've looked at the statements, and considering Hammer's question about the 1st 48 hours.

I believe before Dave went to the Nord station he stopped at another station and the officer there told Dave they didn't know anything about a missing girl try the other station.

Now here we have an officer saying they didn't know anything about a girl missing but there was an article in the paper about a girl missing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 10:55:39 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Not the first 48 hrs.  But what I find interesting is everything that happened the 9th-10th.  Family informed of death, Joran in his only tearful pose.  Didn't Art Wood (on Dana??) say something about a confession then by Monday (June 13th), it had all changed?? We now see the "discussion" signed by J VanderStratten involved with Joran on the 13th.  Where is Joran's real statement from the 9th-10th?? Was that the one torn up on the desk??


Good point, Buckeye.  We all realize there are statements missing, and the questioning on the statements following were lead by those mossing statements.  WTH are they?  Maybe Tylergal is right...they met with a shreadder or incinerator...Lord knows.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:56:57 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[Different roles.  If working per the Aruban law, Van der Stratten and Jacobs would actully take orders from KJ as far as who to bring in as a witness or suspect.  KJ also is the one who presents the documents to the judge.  Anyone want to guess if KJ neglected to give the judge some of the information?



This so concerned Dave Holloway that he made a trip to see that they were all on the same page.  When they are not on the same page by design, that is hard to address.

Yes, I would love to see what the judges were shown and what they were not and the conclusions they reached as a result.

.


Would it matter, Anna what they judges saw?  After all, these were buddies of the maggot, Paulus.  Do you remember Blacklabel?  I think he was Smit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 10:58:26 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
WASN'T JANSSEN FLOWN IN FROM HOLLAND?

I may be wrong, but I seem to recall that Janssen was flown in early from Holland to manage the case.  Can anyone confirm?

As indicated above from Klaas, on May 31, 2005, Deepak was providing a WITNESS statement, taken by Dennis Dominico JACOBS and Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

Whatdayaknow?  FAT BOY DENNIS JACOBS, right in the middle of the action.

This is one of the doors in, and more importantly, "the way in".

Failure to perfrom, obstruction, assisting in an attempted coverup.  It was the FAT BOY who handed the papers to patsy Janssen.

.

Hammer - no, I don't think she was brought in for the case..think she was already working in Aruba.  Yep, Jacobs is part of the coverup as well, IMO.


Klaas my memory is that she was brought in. I could be wrong. But I don't think she was already in Aruba. I remember her being brought in. Fuzzy memory though. :?


After thinking about this maybe it was because we didn't hear about her until later and that's why I "remember" her being brought in later... :?  I don't know...I'm still leaning towards her being brought in later....ok I think it's because I "understood their laws" at that time was something about it being her "rotation" to come to Aruba...that the Dutch lawyers  were on a rotation to come to Aruba ("vacation") and they "chose" her to come at the time because she was supposed to be a hot shot at the time...does anyone remeber this or am I crazy? :lol:


She was the one who signed the order for Johns & Jones to be arrested and oversaw that, like a big bad cowgirl, whose hat fell off because she has no chin to hold it on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 11:02:04 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
HAMMER - she may have been taking orders from someone, or under pressure, but the prosecutor is the one who decides if someone is a witness or suspect:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/KarenJ.jpg)


She was taking orders from Paulus to arrest these two "Negroes" before they blame 'my son.'


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 12, 2006, 11:08:06 AM
I'd be interested in Jansens tenure in Aruba before Natalee disappeared. What cases if any did she prosecute, etc ... and more specifically what was her relationship to Paulus?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 12, 2006, 11:19:32 AM
Quote from: "shadow"
I'd be interested in Jansens tenure in Aruba before Natalee disappeared. What cases if any did she prosecute, etc ... and more specifically what was her relationship to Paulus?


Were we not told when KJ went to Holland that she and Paulus shared adjoining offices?  I am not sure where we got this information, but during that time he was allowed to come and go willy nilly in that office, and surely if there was anything that needed to disappear, during her absence, he could assure it did.  

I hope we will find out what the relationship was between them but without some honesty, we will never find that out and I think honest people will be afraid to talk or never contacted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 12, 2006, 11:20:23 AM
"In the persecution of criminal acts, the Public Prosecutor's Office operates completely independent from the Minister of Justice and the Government of Aruba. The Public Prosecutor's Office does not have to justify its actions with regards to the persecution of criminal acts to the Minister of Justice or the Government of Aruba."
(from Nov. 11 article on aruba.com regarding Natalee Holloway case)

Jansen may have been following orders, but it was her call and her sole reponsibility based on the above interpretation. Any idea who else makes up the public prosecutors office? Apologies if this has already been covered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 12, 2006, 11:20:54 AM
I'm sure if we ask Klaas nicely, she will reference something about Karin's claim to fame in the Netherlands.  I believe she got a conviction in a case where there was no body and that was considered pretty unusual.

Klaas, that's all the detail I'm good for.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 11:21:37 AM
From Shizaru's timeline:

June 1: Dave Holloway arrives on Aruba. The first two polis stations he visits are unaware of Natalee's disappearance. At the Noord station, Jacobs tells him that she probably got drunk or fell in love and ran off for a few days. Jacobs advises Dave to go relax and have a beer at CnCs, that is the best place to look for her. However he also tells Dave that they should be careful to cover their drinks at CnCs because sometimes people will slip drugs in them (Family's Nov 1 letter, Dave's book)

June 1: Beth and Jug arrive at Noord police station to file missing persons report, are made to wait while Jacobs shaves and finishes his Frosted Flakes. Jug overhears polis use the word "puta" (Vanity Fair, CNN 10/3/05)

June 1: First coverage of Natalee's disappearance on cable news prograns in the US

June 1: Aruba Today editor Julia Renfro organizes the first search teams, which meet in the HI lobby following a series of radio announcements, and consist mostly of tourists. Van der Straaten is not happy that the search is taking place, and tells the group not to cause traffic problems (Vanity Fair)

June 1: Satish and Deepak seperately take polis to point out the HI dropoff spot, Satish tells them he already did so the day before but polis are unaware of that and he has to do it again. Satish tells polis that Deepak said Joran was “crazy” because he had been French kissing a girl he just met. Afterwords Deepak and Satish go meet Joran at the Raquet Club, and talk with him in front of the club for about 15 minutes. until polis arrive and take Joran to point out the dropoff spot. At about 10:30 pm Deepak and Satish go to Joran's apartment, where they tell Anita the HI lie (S 6/13, 6/24)

June 1: Anita VDSloot returns to Aruba from the Netherlands. at about 8:00 pm.

June 1 or 2: Polis put trio under surveilance (48 Hours)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 11:27:29 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From Shizaru's timeline:

June 1: Dave Holloway arrives on Aruba. The first two polis stations he visits are unaware of Natalee's disappearance. At the Noord station, Jacobs tells him that she probably got drunk or fell in love and ran off for a few days. Jacobs advises Dave to go relax and have a beer at CnCs, that is the best place to look for her. However he also tells Dave that they should be careful to cover their drinks at CnCs because sometimes people will slip drugs in them (Family's Nov 1 letter, Dave's book)

This is exactly what I mean.  How did Julia Renfro know about Natalee missing before the police.

Someone printed an article or a post that Julia made on the message boards explaining all she did and how she even printed an article in the paper.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 12, 2006, 11:31:27 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
I'm sure if we ask Klaas nicely, she will reference something about Karin's claim to fame in the Netherlands.  I believe she got a conviction in a case where there was no body and that was considered pretty unusual.

Klaas, that's all the detail I'm good for.


thanks Peaches :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 12, 2006, 11:33:21 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "shadow"
I'd be interested in Jansens tenure in Aruba before Natalee disappeared. What cases if any did she prosecute, etc ... and more specifically what was her relationship to Paulus?


Were we not told when KJ went to Holland that she and Paulus shared adjoining offices?  I am not sure where we got this information, but during that time he was allowed to come and go willy nilly in that office, and surely if there was anything that needed to disappear, during her absence, he could assure it did.  

I hope we will find out what the relationship was between them but without some honesty, we will never find that out and I think honest people will be afraid to talk or never contacted.


I thought I remembered something about offices in the same building, possiblly adjoining, but wasn't sure. I agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 11:34:31 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
I'm sure if we ask Klaas nicely, she will reference something about Karin's claim to fame in the Netherlands.  I believe she got a conviction in a case where there was no body and that was considered pretty unusual.

Klaas, that's all the detail I'm good for.


That's about all I remember as well.

FYI - Need to shut our power down so I'll be offline for a couple hours!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 11:37:40 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From Shizaru's timeline:

June 1: Dave Holloway arrives on Aruba. The first two polis stations he visits are unaware of Natalee's disappearance. At the Noord station, Jacobs tells him that she probably got drunk or fell in love and ran off for a few days. Jacobs advises Dave to go relax and have a beer at CnCs, that is the best place to look for her. However he also tells Dave that they should be careful to cover their drinks at CnCs because sometimes people will slip drugs in them (Family's Nov 1 letter, Dave's book)

This is exactly what I mean.  How did Julia Renfro know about Natalee missing before the police.

Someone printed an article or a post that Julia made on the message boards explaining all she did and how she even printed an article in the paper.


Yep, that's why I brought it over.  Also, states that VanderStraaten is unhappy with JR's search, worried about traffic....Anita returns, knows what's going on, and has meeting that night with 2K.  Surveillance begins, where is that info?  All we've seen is the phone & computer records.  The car interior had to have been changed during this time frame.  Rudy said there was blood....later found to be Dutch chocolate and cleaning fluid.  

As Mark Furhman & many others have stated,  routine detective work was not done during those crucial first hours, and the folly continued thereafter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 12, 2006, 11:42:09 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From Shizaru's timeline:

June 1: Dave Holloway arrives on Aruba. The first two polis stations he visits are unaware of Natalee's disappearance. At the Noord station, Jacobs tells him that she probably got drunk or fell in love and ran off for a few days. Jacobs advises Dave to go relax and have a beer at CnCs, that is the best place to look for her. However he also tells Dave that they should be careful to cover their drinks at CnCs because sometimes people will slip drugs in them (Family's Nov 1 letter, Dave's book)

This is exactly what I mean.  How did Julia Renfro know about Natalee missing before the police.

Someone printed an article or a post that Julia made on the message boards explaining all she did and how she even printed an article in the paper.


Yep, that's why I brought it over.  Also, states that VanderStraaten is unhappy with JR's search, worried about traffic....Anita returns, knows what's going on, and has meeting that night with 2K.  Surveillance begins, where is that info?  All we've seen is the phone & computer records.  The car interior had to have been changed during this time frame.  Rudy said there was blood....later found to be Dutch chocolate and cleaning fluid.  

As Mark Furhman & many others have stated,  routine detective work was not done during those crucial first hours, and the folly continued thereafter.


Really that quote from Shirazus timeline is quite telling. Almost as if Jacob's is hinting at what happened to Natalee . . . cover your drinks. WTF!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 11:47:47 AM
Will be back online in a couple hours hopefully!!  See you all later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 12:35:23 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From Shizaru's timeline:

June 1: Dave Holloway arrives on Aruba. The first two polis stations he visits are unaware of Natalee's disappearance. At the Noord station, Jacobs tells him that she probably got drunk or fell in love and ran off for a few days. Jacobs advises Dave to go relax and have a beer at CnCs, that is the best place to look for her. However he also tells Dave that they should be careful to cover their drinks at CnCs because sometimes people will slip drugs in them (Family's Nov 1 letter, Dave's book)

This is exactly what I mean.  How did Julia Renfro know about Natalee missing before the police.

Someone printed an article or a post that Julia made on the message boards explaining all she did and how she even printed an article in the paper.


Yep, that's why I brought it over.  Also, states that VanderStraaten is unhappy with JR's search, worried about traffic....Anita returns, knows what's going on, and has meeting that night with 2K.  Surveillance begins, where is that info?  All we've seen is the phone & computer records.  The car interior had to have been changed during this time frame.  Rudy said there was blood....later found to be Dutch chocolate and cleaning fluid.  

As Mark Furhman & many others have stated,  routine detective work was not done during those crucial first hours, and the folly continued thereafter.


I think Anita knew the whole deal before she arrived home.  She knew all this took place in her home.  I also believe that while Anita was away she placed a few phone calls to Joran's school.

Yes I agree that the interior was completely replaced in Deepak's car during that time.  It had to be replaced because the K2 could bury Joran for what he did to Natalee.  He didn't get the scratches and bruises on his face being such a good sporter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 12:58:51 PM
SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”

I take this to be that Joran was in his rage at that point and badly harmed or killed Natalee at that point.

SATISH'S 6/13/05 STATEMENT:

"Then I asked my brother how the girl was doing."

Both Kalpoes know what happened to Natalee because they were present.

BETH'S QUESTION TO DEEPAK:

Did you help her Deepak.

While Deepak stood there looking down and not saying a word because he knows he could have helped her and he didn't.

CHRIS COUMO PRIMETIME INTERVIEW:

"Did you see Natalee in distress"

That question caught him off guard and made him think because he knows he killed her and he didn't expect that question.  He facial expression said it all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 02:32:57 PM
OMG, I'm watching the end of "A Bridge Too Far" (WWII, battle to take Arnhem).  Robert Redford wants to go forward - they're 17k's from Arhem - and some British general wants to stop.  Redford screams at him that half his men are dead, there are British soldiers in Arnhem in serious trouble and they can't stop now.  The British are going to die!  They've been captured by the Germans!  

Just a little historical perspective on Arnhem.  Now I'll go read some and see what's happening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 02:45:45 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
On the Tuesday, Van Der Stratten went to Paulus's  work and told him to take Joran to the police station at Bulbai. So, a statement was made on the Tuesday in Paulus's presence.  Then Wednesday, Satish and Deepak went to the Racquet Club and gave Joran the details of the HI drop off because they had already done a drive thru with the police. Because Joran was under 18 at the time, Paulus was allowed to be present on the Tuesday.
The police never looked in the obvious direction of Deepak, Satish and Joran until the Security Guards came up with alibis.
As far as Karin Janssen is is concerned, she signed the arrest warrants for the guards. Her information comes from the police. Did she do anything in this case ? She could not get a search warrant ( or did she try ) for the VDS compound and every one of her presentations in court seems to have fallen flat.
I hope that DeVries looks into the relationships between these people, the Sloots, Jacobs, Jan VanDer , Janssen before any of this happened.
And if there is any dirt, really good dirt, I want to hear it.


Kat, I don't know if this case will be solved, but your last paragraph is high on my wish list.  That's the key to this.   (Emphasis added by me.)  Then, all of a sudden, you know why there's no evidence.  Or so they say.  If there's a record of work done on Deepak's backseat, with an FBI agent saying it looked like blood, you've got evidence.  If you've got statements by Joran that were thrown out by a Judge who spends weekends with the Sloots, you've got evidence.  If you've got a witness who helped dispose of a body, you've got evidence.  Problem there would be that without a plea deal, that witness won't talk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 12, 2006, 03:00:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”

I take this to be that Joran was in his rage at that point and badly harmed or killed Natalee at that point.

SATISH'S 6/13/05 STATEMENT:

"Then I asked my brother how the girl was doing."

Both Kalpoes know what happened to Natalee because they were present.

BETH'S QUESTION TO DEEPAK:

Did you help her Deepak.

While Deepak stood there looking down and not saying a word because he knows he could have helped her and he didn't.

CHRIS COUMO PRIMETIME INTERVIEW:

"Did you see Natalee in distress"

That question caught him off guard and made him think because he knows he killed her and he didn't expect that question.  He facial expression said it all.


Part 1:  I don't think the "Joran is crazy" statement was because he was french kissing a girl he just met.  My goodness, these guys went out every week scoping out the tourists.  Joran was doing a lot more than french kissing Natalee.  

Part 2:  If Satish really asked "how's the girl doing" then he didn't know she died - OR she didn't die that night.  That along with other Kalpoe statements and the police car tape, makes me think that one or both Kalpoes didn't know the final outcome of the evening until after the lie fell apart and they found themselves in jail.  They went back to cruise the pond area, looking for something to help them determine what happened because they didn't believe Joran and they wanted to see if police or family were searching there.  

Parts 3 and 4:  Self-explanatory.  Deepak could have helped, but didn't.  Joran did see Natalee in distress.  That was planned when they went out that night IMHO.   :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 03:05:19 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
From Shizaru's timeline:

June 1: Dave Holloway arrives on Aruba. The first two polis stations he visits are unaware of Natalee's disappearance. At the Noord station, Jacobs tells him that she probably got drunk or fell in love and ran off for a few days. Jacobs advises Dave to go relax and have a beer at CnCs, that is the best place to look for her. However he also tells Dave that they should be careful to cover their drinks at CnCs because sometimes people will slip drugs in them (Family's Nov 1 letter, Dave's book)

This is exactly what I mean.  How did Julia Renfro know about Natalee missing before the police.

Someone printed an article or a post that Julia made on the message boards explaining all she did and how she even printed an article in the paper.


Yep, that's why I brought it over.  Also, states that VanderStraaten is unhappy with JR's search, worried about traffic....Anita returns, knows what's going on, and has meeting that night with 2K.  Surveillance begins, where is that info?  All we've seen is the phone & computer records.  The car interior had to have been changed during this time frame.  Rudy said there was blood....later found to be Dutch chocolate and cleaning fluid.  

As Mark Furhman & many others have stated,  routine detective work was not done during those crucial first hours, and the folly continued thereafter.


Really that quote from Shirazus timeline is quite telling. Almost as if Jacob's is hinting at what happened to Natalee . . . cover your drinks. WTF!


I always took that statement from Jacobs to Dave to cover his drink as rubbing Dave's nose in what happened there to Natalee.  I doubt Jacobs truly was concerned that someone was going to put something in Dave's drink so why say such a thing otherwise?

Yep, he was letting Dave know what happened.

JMO.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 03:39:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
SHANIRO KELLY:

(http://www.boostunit.com/sc/uploads/viejo_shan.jpg)

http://tinyurl.com/yaq55y

He's also here but I can't tell which one he is yet:

http://tinyurl.com/ybpwcv

Just taking a guess here.  The guy in the car has a red shirt on with a white emblem on the right arm and so does the guy in the picture below:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Kelly.jpg)



This  is such good work, I am bringing it forward in case anyone missed it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 03:49:53 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"

Part 1:  I don't think the "Joran is crazy" statement was because he was french kissing a girl he just met.  My goodness, these guys went out every week scoping out the tourists.  Joran was doing a lot more than french kissing Natalee.  

Part 2:  If Satish really asked "how's the girl doing" then he didn't know she died - OR she didn't die that night.  That along with other Kalpoe statements and the police car tape, makes me think that one or both Kalpoes didn't know the final outcome of the evening until after the lie fell apart and they found themselves in jail.  They went back to cruise the pond area, looking for something to help them determine what happened because they didn't believe Joran and they wanted to see if police or family were searching there.  

Parts 3 and 4:  Self-explanatory.  Deepak could have helped, but didn't.  Joran did see Natalee in distress.  That was planned when they went out that night IMHO.   :x



I agree that the statement that Joran was crazy was NOT about his French kissing a girl but something much stranger.  Remember that the statements say they have had sex in the same rooms before so I hardly think kissing is going to elicit that kind of response.

And as to Paulus and the Prosecutor sharing office space and her having worked for Paulus previously, I also seem to recall that the paperwork for taking DNA sample from Joran only suddenly turned up missing from the file.

It was rumored that KJ then personally took the sample and had it tested on her own, the judge found this out and allowed it entry because it did not match Joran to a sample they had.

Could the taking of the sample on her own have been KJ becoming a bit annoyed with Paulus for taking things from the file and making her appear incompetent?  Did she plan to get the DNA information secretly and use to to keep Paulus better in line?

Did Paulus have anything to do with the paperwork for taking Joran's DNA just vanishing?  It did not vanish in the Kalpoe files, just Joran's file.  And if I recall the timing correctly, Paulus is then asked to remove his personal things and not to return to the courthouse.

So going to work was just a way to find out things about the case for Paulus.  He should have been banned from the courthouse from the first day.

Nothing was done in anything close to what could be considered a normal manner.  Not one thing.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 12, 2006, 04:05:42 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
On the Tuesday, Van Der Stratten went to Paulus's  work and told him to take Joran to the police station at Bulbai. So, a statement was made on the Tuesday in Paulus's presence.  Then Wednesday, Satish and Deepak went to the Racquet Club and gave Joran the details of the HI drop off because they had already done a drive thru with the police. Because Joran was under 18 at the time, Paulus was allowed to be present on the Tuesday.
The police never looked in the obvious direction of Deepak, Satish and Joran until the Security Guards came up with alibis.
As far as Karin Janssen is is concerned, she signed the arrest warrants for the guards. Her information comes from the police. Did she do anything in this case ? She could not get a search warrant ( or did she try ) for the VDS compound and every one of her presentations in court seems to have fallen flat.
I hope that DeVries looks into the relationships between these people, the Sloots, Jacobs, Jan VanDer , Janssen before any of this happened.
And if there is any dirt, really good dirt, I want to hear it.



KatGram,
Beth looked at the HI security tape and knew that they did not drop off Natalee after being shown by the J2K exactly the spot where they claimed to have left her.  I think that would have been by Tuesday as she did not sleep.  

So I still contend that it was known before the arrest of the SG that J2K did not drop Natalee off at the HI but they arrested them anyway knowing full well the ones last seen with Natalee lied.  Having alibis didn't seem to help the SG much as they were still held for ten days and remain suspects until this day.

Since no one bought the SG as culprits, I do think they keep them listed as suspects just in case someone is not following the case very closely, just looks so good to have them listed as suspects to deflect from the Island's Favorite Son as being guilty.

KJ said we couldn't think of any reason for the boys to lie.  She seems very lacking in imagination to be a professional.

And I think rather than drugs, it is money laundering on which both she and Judge Smit are considered some sort of experts.  Smit is quoted in some of the big meetings with major banking and government organizations on money laundering, the international reports and things like that.  Interesting, isn't it?  I always thought that was why KJ was in Aruba and then she was assigned this case because she had successfully prosecuted a no body/no crime case in The Netherlands.

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 04:16:39 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaStooges2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/GuiltyFlow2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/bingo2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 12, 2006, 04:29:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaStooges2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/GuiltyFlow2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/bingo2.gif)

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sue on November 12, 2006, 04:56:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaStooges2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/GuiltyFlow2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/bingo2.gif)




ROFLMFAO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sirensong on November 12, 2006, 05:17:21 PM
I am still looking around trying to find out where I have seen this name before :  CREUTZBERG, PETER  It's driving me nuts!!

I haven't been able to find the posts that had the different partnerships and businesses out of Florida.  Oh, well, maybe it's just my imagination.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: tcumom on November 12, 2006, 05:45:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ArubaStooges2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/GuiltyFlow2.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/bingo2.gif)

Klaas ~ my favorite yet!  You are superb! Larry, Curly, Moe ~ that says it all!  Thanks for a smile today!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: "sirensong"
I am still looking around trying to find out where I have seen this name before :  CREUTZBERG, PETER  It's driving me nuts!!

I haven't been able to find the posts that had the different partnerships and businesses out of Florida.  Oh, well, maybe it's just my imagination.


I've been looking too and haven't found anything.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 12, 2006, 06:36:19 PM
KLAAS !!!!!!!!!!! The Stooges !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/thsigns-toot.gif)

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/th21.gif)

YOU ROCK N ROLL KLAAS !!!!!!!!!!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 06:45:18 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
KLAAS !!!!!!!!!!! The Stooges !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/thsigns-toot.gif)

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/th21.gif)

YOU ROCK N ROLL KLAAS !!!!!!!!!!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

That's what happens to me on a slow news day, I resort to photoshop..ha ha ha  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 12, 2006, 07:08:49 PM
Anna you are right about the KJ and the money laundering.
.
We have discussed the throwing of the " choller" off the bridge. BTW, this is a human being. Was the person hurt ? That bridge didn't look like a footbridge. Maybe the person died ? What happened after the person went into the water ? Did the boys who were there stand around and laugh ?  I read somehere, just postings,  that there was another episode that Jan Van Der Stratten covered up . Was this it, or was it when girls went to the police to complain about Joran.
.
DeVries is most likely looking into Joran's past to see if there is any capability based on his past behaviour. If you google or yahoo anything on sociopath, you can find a list of descriptors that fit Joran's behaviour.
.
And the sad thing is, the Sloots knew what Joran was. No way did they really think he was the person they hired Joe T to say he was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 07:11:50 PM
Evening monkeys.  Hope everyone is well tonight. Since we are looking to put some faces with some names of the ALE, could I ask for a few.  Eric Soemers, Luigi Croes, Clyde Burke and Roland Tromp to name a few.  It is interesting to notice which statements Jacobs and Burke were responsible for.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 07:16:55 PM
Never mind Klaas, I foudn some of them.  I didn't realize Sunfreak had been so thorough.  My mistake....slinking back to my corner... :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 07:34:46 PM
Well, I am not staying here to talk to myself...be back later. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 12, 2006, 07:42:38 PM
Lala's I'll talk to you. Klaasend's FP has been a hit. Something Bad Happened. I like the three stooges one.
PPl seem to have alot of faith in Devries as he doesn't seem to care
about being correct in a political fashion. He had gone after ( so I am reading bit by bit ) people where others fear to tread. He does not answer to any " political masters " on Aruba or in Holland.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 12, 2006, 07:46:02 PM
Hey, good evening Monkeys, just doing alittle lurking and reading. I did notice something about the name Peter Cruezenberg. I do find a fishing boat captain by that name. It is not exactly your average, everyday John Doe type name........ :) Could this be the guy?

http://tinyurl.com/tz99f
www.aruba-mahimahi.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 07:53:58 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Hey, good evening Monkeys, just doing alittle lurking and reading. I did notice something about the name Peter Cruezenberg. I do find a fishing boat captain by that name. It is not exactly your average, everyday John Doe type name........ :) Could this be the guy?

http://tinyurl.com/tz99f
www.aruba-mahimahi.com


Why are we looking for info about this guy anyway?  I think I missed something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 12, 2006, 07:56:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Hey, good evening Monkeys, just doing alittle lurking and reading. I did notice something about the name Peter Cruezenberg. I do find a fishing boat captain by that name. It is not exactly your average, everyday John Doe type name........ :) Could this be the guy?

http://tinyurl.com/tz99f
www.aruba-mahimahi.com


Why are we looking for info about this guy anyway?  I think I missed something.


Lala's looks like you better go and reread your Shango to find out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 12, 2006, 07:59:08 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Hey, good evening Monkeys, just doing alittle lurking and reading. I did notice something about the name Peter Cruezenberg. I do find a fishing boat captain by that name. It is not exactly your average, everyday John Doe type name........ :) Could this be the guy?

http://tinyurl.com/tz99f
www.aruba-mahimahi.com


Why are we looking for info about this guy anyway?  I think I missed something.


Lala's looks like you better go and reread your Shango to find out.


Oops, sorry Lala's that was a snide remark, I shouldn't have posted it. Forgive me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 12, 2006, 07:59:30 PM
Beats me  :P  I saw mention in post on page 14.

sirensong wrote;
Quote
I am still looking around trying to find out where I have seen this name before : CREUTZBERG, PETER It's driving me nuts!!

I haven't been able to find the posts that had the different partnerships and businesses out of Florida. Oh, well, maybe it's just my imagination.


Klaasend wrote;
Quote

I've been looking too and haven't found anything.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 08:03:23 PM
Carnut
Don't think for one minute that I don't a ready supply of pencils handy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 08:04:51 PM
Oops!  That should have read have a ready supply of pencils handy. Gee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 08:10:45 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Lala's I'll talk to you. Klaasend's FP has been a hit. Something Bad Happened. I like the three stooges one.
PPl seem to have alot of faith in Devries as he doesn't seem to care
about being correct in a political fashion. He had gone after ( so I am reading bit by bit ) people where others fear to tread. He does not answer to any " political masters " on Aruba or in Holland.


Yeah, noticed it copied at FOB  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 08:12:56 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Appearing in the Trade Register of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in ARUBA since 27 OCTOBER 1986 under serial number 6329.0 is the company with the trade name:
 
 
WONDERCHEMICAL N.V.  
 
Business address AVENIDA DON MILIO CROES (V/H FERGUSONSTRAAT) 19, ORANJESTAD OOST  
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY  
Name of the company  WONDERCHEMICAL N.V.  
Statutory seat  ARUBA  
Date of incorporation  24 OCTOBER 1986  
     
Authorized capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 50,000.00  
Issued capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00  
Paid up capital  ARUBAN FLORINS 10,000.00  
THIS COMPANY HAS BEEN STRICKEN FROM OUR FILES 31 JANUARY 1998  
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD:  
 
CREUTZBERG, PETER;  
Residing in  PARAGUANA 10-C, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, 'S-GRAVENHAGE on 12 DECEMBER 1948  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR  
Effective  24 OCTOBER 1986  
Authority  FULL  
   
OBJECTIVE(S) OF THE COMPANY  
 
HET FABRICEREN EN VERPAKKEN VAN - ALSMEDE DE GROOT- EN AGENTURENHANDEL IN - INDUSTRIELE- EN HUISHOUDELIJKE CHEMICALIEN, ZOALS SCHOONMAAKMIDDELEN, VERDELGINGSMIDDELEN EN KUNSTMEST PRODUCTEN.  
   
Only valid if accordingly signed by the Chamber of Commerce & Industry Aruba - J.E. Irausquin Blvd.10, Oranjestad, Aruba.


Peter CREUTZBERG used to own this chemical company.  I googled his name and came up with the same deep sea fishing information and guy Bleachedblack found.  I believe it's the same guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 12, 2006, 08:23:43 PM
I have a "ton" of info on him....

Why can't I "copy & paste" from the Aruba Registry anymore?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 12, 2006, 08:28:10 PM
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 08:35:24 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
I have a "ton" of info on him....

Why can't I "copy & paste" from the Aruba Registry anymore?????

I have problems copying it too.  Have to do a screen shot and save it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 08:37:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.

That letter has been posted at SM for months and is currently in the Important Case Documents forum with the statements and such.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 12, 2006, 08:38:07 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.

Or a Medley or a Moon or a Wang.
I don't go to FOB often. I feel too agitated afterwards. I never go to RU
any more, same reason. These ppl pull their info out of their A*S.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 08:39:36 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Carnut"
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.

Or a Medley or a Moon or a Wang.
I don't go to FOB often. I feel too agitated afterwards. I never go to RU
any more, same reason. These ppl pull their info out of their A*S.

Originally I was thinking Medleyrelay but after review decided it was more likely Julia Renfro.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 12, 2006, 08:41:04 PM
Remember...
How the OCTOPUS Day Charter/Dinner Criuise
went out that Monday morning & didn't return for WEEKS later..... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 08:41:07 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.


What letter?  I must be on the wrong page.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 12, 2006, 08:42:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.

That letter has been posted at SM for months and is currently in the Important Case Documents forum with the statements and such.


Never mind...Carnut...don't you have anything better to do than confuse me? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 12, 2006, 08:44:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Carnut"
That 'letter' Florida just posted was way too dumb to have been created by PVDS, it had to come from the mind of Anita or Julia.

Or a Medley or a Moon or a Wang.
I don't go to FOB often. I feel too agitated afterwards. I never go to RU
any more, same reason. These ppl pull their info out of their A*S.

Originally I was thinking Medleyrelay but after review decided it was more likely Julia Renfro.


Well, lately I've been having a problem deciding if Julia is anything more than just Anita's mouthpiece.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 12, 2006, 08:46:31 PM
THE LETTER came from ARKANSAS

Paulus' friend in N.C.

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050723/aruba.shtml


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 10:33:08 PM
Without a Trace, tonight..storyline has guy offer girlfriend trip to Aruba paid in cash.  He disappears....talk of money laundering and gambling.  Jack, lead honcho, drugged while gambling on the job, then tortured by female suspect.  Not over, but just thinking of Natalee.  Maybe someone else is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kathya0427 on November 12, 2006, 10:36:14 PM
this has been an extremely interesting thread...you guys are awesome...it has taken to a long time tonight to read this topic...but it was well worth the time...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 12, 2006, 10:36:28 PM
To be clear, Jack (Without a Trace) was on the job, gambling to get info and was drugged, by something in his cocktail.  Just want to clear that up, since it was not earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 10:38:19 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Without a Trace, tonight..storyline has guy offer girlfriend trip to Aruba paid in cash.  He disappears....talk of money laundering and gambling.  Jack, lead honcho, drugged while gambling on the job, then tortured by female suspect.  Not over, but just thinking of Natalee.  Maybe someone else is.

What channel is it on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 10:39:25 PM
Quote from: "Kathya0427"
this has been an extremely interesting thread...you guys are awesome...it has taken to a long time tonight to read this topic...but it was well worth the time...

Thanks Kathya!  How did you like my Three Stooges?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 12, 2006, 10:59:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Originally I was thinking Medleyrelay but after review decided it was more likely Julia Renfro.

Me too. I re-read the letter last week for the first time in months and it had Renfro's stink all over it. Makes me think of the time she (Glenda) expained that she knew it's contents because somebody had "read it over the phone to her". There is a little truth in every lie...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 11:03:39 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Originally I was thinking Medleyrelay but after review decided it was more likely Julia Renfro.

Me too. I re-read the letter last week for the first time in months and it had Renfro's stink all over it. Makes me think of the time she (Glenda) expained that she knew it's contents because somebody had "read it over the phone to her". There is a little truth in every lie...

Exactly!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 12, 2006, 11:09:06 PM
Klaas, did you get a e-mail from me? I think i sent it to an old addy...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 11:17:56 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Klaas, did you get a e-mail from me? I think i sent it to an old addy...

Yeah, got it and just responded


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sb on November 12, 2006, 11:18:00 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"

Part 2:  If Satish really asked "how's the girl doing" then he didn't know she died - OR she didn't die that night.  That along with other Kalpoe statements and the police car tape, makes me think that one or both Kalpoes didn't know the final outcome of the evening until after the lie fell apart and they found themselves in jail.  They went back to cruise the pond area, looking for something to help them determine what happened because they didn't believe Joran and they wanted to see if police or family were searching there.  



This is an excellent point and one that has almost never been brought up. And I agree with you. I am extremely torn about how much involvement I think the Kalpoes have in whatever violent act took place. I am not sure they had any other intentions but sexual activity, or rape. I DON'T think they had motive or inclination to kill her intentionally.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sb on November 12, 2006, 11:23:45 PM
Have y'all all gone to bed early tonight? I wondered if there were any radio interviews this evening that might be of interest. I am seeing nothing being discussed so I guess Dana must have had a quiet night.

I'm still reading back so I'll sign off too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 12, 2006, 11:25:43 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Have y'all all gone to bed early tonight? I wondered if there were any radio interviews this evening that might be of interest. I am seeing nothing being discussed so I guess Dana must have had a quiet night.

I'm still reading back so I'll sign off too.

Sorry SB - it's been a very slow day.  No Dana show tonight, no news that I'm aware of.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 12:00:57 AM
I am still here, just reading and lurking.  In case no one comes back I am hugging Nemo now and hope his mommy is okay.  Haven't seen her in a while....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 12:08:44 AM
Quote from: "Florida"
THE LETTER came from ARKANSAS

Paulus' friend in N.C.

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050723/aruba.shtml


Has anyone, other than an aruban, verified that the letter actually had a U.S. Postmark on it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 12:11:38 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Without a Trace, tonight..storyline has guy offer girlfriend trip to Aruba paid in cash.  He disappears....talk of money laundering and gambling.  Jack, lead honcho, drugged while gambling on the job, then tortured by female suspect.  Not over, but just thinking of Natalee.  Maybe someone else is.

I saw that. Laughed and thought of Monkeys. Didn't see the whole thing as I had to go out. Will view nail guns in a new light.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 12:15:10 AM
Quote from: "San"
SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”

I take this to be that Joran was in his rage at that point and badly harmed or killed Natalee at that point.

SATISH'S 6/13/05 STATEMENT:

"Then I asked my brother how the girl was doing."

Both Kalpoes know what happened to Natalee because they were present.

BETH'S QUESTION TO DEEPAK:

Did you help her Deepak.

While Deepak stood there looking down and not saying a word because he knows he could have helped her and he didn't.

CHRIS COUMO PRIMETIME INTERVIEW:

"Did you see Natalee in distress"

That question caught him off guard and made him think because he knows he killed her and he didn't expect that question.  He facial expression said it all.


Just in case I forget this...very observant San.  It speaks volumes and little was actually said.  That is what I mean by looking at the lies to see the real truth.  Yes, Satish saw something bad happen to Natalee.  I am willing to bet it had something to do with a head injury.  I think this is why they made up the "she fell" story to add to the HI lie.  She was hurt by one of those 3 guys in some way or they caused her to be hurt.  Otherwise, they would have helped her to receive medical attention.  An accident is an accident and no reason to hide anything...then there's the other thing...intentional injury resulting from anger.  If it is really a case of just her falling down and hitting her head, there would be no reason to disappear the body.  There was way more going on here and it wasn't just sex.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 13, 2006, 07:19:27 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Hey, good evening Monkeys, just doing alittle lurking and reading. I did notice something about the name Peter Cruezenberg. I do find a fishing boat captain by that name. It is not exactly your average, everyday John Doe type name........ :) Could this be the guy?

http://tinyurl.com/tz99f
www.aruba-mahimahi.com


this sure looks like that guy on the Aru-bay video !!!!

 :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 13, 2006, 07:22:01 AM
Good morning.

Working and lurking.  Tons of work on my desk!


Title: Good Morning all
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 07:26:33 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 07:34:33 AM
There is also a filmaker/cinematograper named Peter Creutzberg:
"The Nature of Columbia"
• Peter Creutzberg and his family of film-makers
http://tinyurl.com/yjrm74
Cannes Film Festival 1977
http://tinyurl.com/yjvajx


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 07:55:51 AM
June 13th 2005 statement of suspect Deepak S. KALPOE, about what he did on Monday, May 30th 2005:
At about 18.00 hours, I called Joran on his mobile phone. I had called him with the telephone from where I work. The phone number there is 588xxxx. I asked Joran, how he was doing and if he had gone to school.
I forgot what he told me, but I asked him subsequently what he was doing now.
--
Why would Deepak ask that question at 6 PM Monday evening?  What was the reason Deepak thought Joran might have not have gone to school as he had remarked about Joran' saying he was printing out of a homework assignment at midnight that delayed their departure to C&C's?  The question was foremost in Deepak's mind yet he "forgot" the answer.  
Joran statement, in Dutch, reads that Deepak went back with "twee honden" which translates to two dogs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 09:35:54 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Without a Trace, tonight..storyline has guy offer girlfriend trip to Aruba paid in cash.  He disappears....talk of money laundering and gambling.  Jack, lead honcho, drugged while gambling on the job, then tortured by female suspect.  Not over, but just thinking of Natalee.  Maybe someone else is.

What channel is it on?


I'm sorry, Klaasend.  Did not see this, obviously.  The show is broadcast on CBS, channel 2, here.

I ended up getting a phone call and missed the ending, anyway.  Such is life.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 10:37:37 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
June 13th 2005 statement of suspect Deepak S. KALPOE, about what he did on Monday, May 30th 2005:
At about 18.00 hours, I called Joran on his mobile phone. I had called him with the telephone from where I work. The phone number there is 588xxxx. I asked Joran, how he was doing and if he had gone to school.
I forgot what he told me, but I asked him subsequently what he was doing now.
--
Why would Deepak ask that question at 6 PM Monday evening?  What was the reason Deepak thought Joran might have not have gone to school as he had remarked about Joran' saying he was printing out of a homework assignment at midnight that delayed their departure to C&C's?  The question was foremost in Deepak's mind yet he "forgot" the answer.  
Joran statement, in Dutch, reads that Deepak went back with "twee honden" which translates to two dogs.

Think Deepak was asking, so, did you take care of it ? I forgot what he told me. I was having a pee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:11:45 AM
RUMOR of some new information coming out of Aruba regarding the case.  Not sure what this means, just thought I'd pass it along.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 11:12:38 AM
Good morning Klaas.....nothing like a rumor to wake us all up.... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:17:45 AM
Nothing to do with the rumor (I don't think) but I was working on this  :lol:



(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/8ballJoranJail.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 11:18:43 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nothing to do with the rumor (I don't think) but I was working on this  :lol:



(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/8ballJoranJail.gif)

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 11:19:25 AM
Had one of those as a kid.....wish it were true....!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 11:20:32 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nothing to do with the rumor (I don't think) but I was working on this  :lol:



(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/8ballJoranJail.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

The best yet, klaas :lol:

You deserve an award for this stuff!
Kewl 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 11:22:50 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
RUMOR of some new information coming out of Aruba regarding the case.  Not sure what this means, just thought I'd pass it along.


WoW . . . I really hope it is somehting of substance. Morning Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 13, 2006, 11:25:39 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!  Been working and lurking - I am so lucky - gonna have an insurance audit on Fri.  Yipee.

Klaas - hmmmm rumor..anyone want to start a rumor about what the rumor is??? :lol:

J/K - I certainly hope it is something....guess we'll have to wait and see.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 11:26:43 AM
let the SINGING begin !!!! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:28:41 AM
Quote from: "robots"
let the SINGING begin !!!! 8)


Robots - that's what I'm hoping for!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 11:29:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
let the SINGING begin !!!! 8)


Robots - that's what I'm hoping for!


me too

like a canary   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 13, 2006, 11:29:25 AM
Morning Monkeys.

Just a reminder that there's a thread in the lounge about SunFreak. A couple of monkeys visited her over the weekend.

Okay. Back to standby, waiting for Rumor Eruption.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:31:24 AM
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 11:31:51 AM
its not IF the truth comes out its WHEN it comes out

it will come out- BET the FARM on it
 

then i get to WATCH the GUILTY parties tell things like this

"im sorry" and then they will become "RELIGIOUS"

im not SMASHING religion by any means,,, i just hate it when people
"CONVERT"  when it is convenient for them

i call it a a LOAD of BULLCRAP
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 13, 2006, 11:36:53 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/35n0won_th.gif)

Remember in the early days when Dompig would tell us to expect the case to break within the next 48 hours and we would stay glued to our computers?  How cynical we have become since those times!

But foolish or not, I continue to have hopes that Peter deVries will be able to at least stir things up enough to produce some results.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 11:38:30 AM
Oh, I love rumors. Sometimes, I even start them.  :lol:  :lol:
.......
I am still interested in the person who was thrown off the bridge.
Odd, that it was in Sander's statement and then they didn't ask any more questions.
............
Well, we have a day off work because of the holiday on Saturday, but I will check in.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 11:41:33 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Morning Monkeys.

Just a reminder that there's a thread in the lounge about SunFreak. A couple of monkeys visited her over the weekend.

Okay. Back to standby, waiting for Rumor Eruption.


morning msmarple just posted in the SunFreak thread. Glad you were able to visit her yesterday. Thanks again for keeping us informaed and rallying the ATL monkeys together to help out. You know how to reach me if I can help out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 11:43:19 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


What is considered the 'southwest corner'?

(I know that sounds stupid -- but the way the island is shaped, I never know :oops: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 11:45:45 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.

Was that a recent search ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 13, 2006, 11:46:26 AM
Quote from: "robots"
its not IF the truth comes out its WHEN it comes out

it will come out- BET the FARM on it
 

then i get to WATCH the GUILTY parties tell things like this

"im sorry" and then they will become "RELIGIOUS"

im not SMASHING religion by any means,,, i just hate it when people
"CONVERT"  when it is convenient for them

i call it a a LOAD of BULLCRAP
 8)


AMEN!  

Rant on, baby.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 11:47:50 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.

Would that be around Manchebo Beach or am I turned around??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 11:50:48 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


What is considered the 'southwest corner'?

(I know that sounds stupid -- but the way the island is shaped, I never know :oops: )


It doesn't sound stupid to me, sharon, because the way I perceive the island has not always matched others with respect to North, East, South, West....Right now, I'm thinking southwest being the area of Baby Beach & the refinery...but, of course, I may be way off course.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 11:50:59 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


What is considered the 'southwest corner'?

(I know that sounds stupid -- but the way the island is shaped, I never know :oops: )


Same here . . . doesn't sound stupid at all to me.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 11:51:09 AM
Quote from: "robots"
let the SINGING begin !!!! 8)


Hi robots....I hear a big "flush" about to happen....how about you....?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:52:35 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


What is considered the 'southwest corner'?

(I know that sounds stupid -- but the way the island is shaped, I never know :oops: )


Closer to the area Pitbull was murdered.

Bottom right on this map:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/MapEvidence7-1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 11:54:00 AM
Thanks klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 11:54:04 AM
Klaas....near the Kalpoes...?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:54:26 AM
Hotels/Arashi Beach/Lighthouse on NorthEast end of island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 11:54:44 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....near the Kalpoes...?


I thought the Kalpoes were central -- Hooiberg?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:55:32 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....near the Kalpoes...?

Not really, but yes "closer" to the Kalpoes residence then the VDS residence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 11:55:33 AM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....near the Kalpoes...?


I thought the Kalpoes were central -- Hooiberg?


okay...thanks sharon


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 11:57:11 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....near the Kalpoes...?


I thought the Kalpoes were central -- Hooiberg?


okay...thanks sharon


Oh MeMere -- don't listen to me :lol:  :lol:  Looks like I was wrong :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 11:58:30 AM
Where did they find the Lysol ? And the piece of foam with teeth marks?
And the shirt ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 13, 2006, 12:00:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 12:01:15 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Where did they find the Lysol ? And the piece of foam with teeth marks?
And the shirt ?

SouthEast end of island


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 12:01:47 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....near the Kalpoes...?


I thought the Kalpoes were central -- Hooiberg?


okay...thanks sharon


Oh MeMere -- don't listen to me :lol:  :lol:  Looks like I was wrong :oops:


No you weren't....I went to my signature line and found their location... :oops:  Sun has loads of information available..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 12:02:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Where did they find the Lysol ? And the piece of foam with teeth marks?
And the shirt ?

SouthEast end of island


I can't see the map. Can someone give me a place or location name in that area? TIA!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 12:04:19 PM
The bloody mattress was found near Baby Beach and the Refinery.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 12:05:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The bloody mattress was found near Baby Beach and the Refinery.


Edited to add, the same area as the Lysol/Foam/Shirt was found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 12:05:04 PM
Evidence, Places, Maps and Miscellaneous.....by Sunfreak


http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=255


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 12:06:57 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Evidence, Places, Maps and Miscellaneous.....by Sunfreak


http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=255


Thank you! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 12:10:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
The bloody mattress was found near Baby Beach and the Refinery.


Edited to add, the same area as the Lysol/Foam/Shirt was found.


I can't remember the man's name -- or what he calls what he does :oops:

But is this close to the area that the guy who could 'see things' was secretly searching the waters??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 13, 2006, 12:11:19 PM
.
Remember the Remote Viewing guy that was on Coast to Coast radio?  Might this be in the area that he designated as being of interest?

 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 12:12:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Remember the Remote Viewing guy that was on Coast to Coast radio?  Might this be in the area that he designated as being of interest?

 :shock:


Thanks Anna!

That's what I was trying to ask :oops:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 13, 2006, 12:14:05 PM
I wouldnt get my hopes up too high that there is some sort of good news comming out of Aruba.  I mean here we are over a year abnd a half later and good news hes never come out of Aruba yet.  Not even once.

If there is some sort of news comming out of aruba, most likely it will be in favor of the suspects


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:17:08 PM
someone is singing


i can sense it  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 12:18:02 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Evidence, Places, Maps and Miscellaneous.....by Sunfreak
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=255

That is an incredible collection of information and pictures!  Kudos Sunfreak on your research!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 13, 2006, 12:18:19 PM
As for starting a rumor, I like that one that the remote viewer has found something!  That should make a few people squirm!

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 12:19:52 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/8ballGuitlyYes.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:21:10 PM
PREDICTION


paulus's sweating has gotten out of control and is stinking up the whole
neighborhood  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 12:21:28 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Remember the Remote Viewing guy that was on Coast to Coast radio?  Might this be in the area that he designated as being of interest?

 :shock:

Not really, the area he designated was very close to the Refinery more on the SouthEast end of the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:22:34 PM
Quote from: "robots"
PREDICTION


paulus's sweating has gotten out of control and is stinking up the whole
neighborhood  8)


TOILET is considering using a TOILET BOWL cleaner over the complete FILTH island, joe Tacopinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaa is objecting, he likes the smell of BULL CRAP   :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 12:23:16 PM
I went over to FOB and didn't see anything except they all seem quite a bit meaner if that is possible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:23:58 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I went over to FOB and didn't see anything except they all seem quite a bit meaner if that is possible.



possbile


yes

EVIL is always EVIL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 12:24:18 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.

Hey Blah!
I thouight the same thing. I was just searching for it.  I thought I read it last week on FP and it was one of the 1st few posts on a thread, but can't find it.

Hi Monkeys!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sue on November 13, 2006, 12:27:56 PM
what ever happen about that remote viewer dude?
I thought that clown was going down to the island again


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 12:29:35 PM
Quote from: "robots"
someone is singing ... i can sense it  8)

Do you think it's the Kalpoe Brothers?  Singing like the Everly Brothers,
to the tune of Kathy's Clown:
Don’t want your lo-o-o-o-ove anymore
Don’t want your ki-i-i-i-isses, that’s for sure
We die each time we hear this sound
“Here they co-o-o-o-ome, that’s the van der Sloot’s clowns”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 13, 2006, 12:30:46 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
what ever happen about that remote viewer dude?
I thought that clown was going down to the island again


Is this the nutjob that Dave met at the hotel while he was in Aruba and decided that he wasnt going to deal with him when the guy asked for a personal item of Natalee's?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:31:45 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "robots"
someone is singing ... i can sense it  8)

Do you think it's the Kalpoe Brothers?  Singing like the Everly Brothers,
to the tune of Kathy's Clown:
Don’t want your lo-o-o-o-ove anymore
Don’t want your ki-i-i-i-isses, that’s for sure
We die each time we hear this sound
“Here they co-o-o-o-ome, that’s the van der Sloot’s clowns”
'

its got to be K1 or K2 or

the person that gave Mini-Sweat Master a ride home that night   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:32:30 PM
from this point foward i will refer to Paulus as DOCTOR EVIL


just as i refer to the island as TOILET





 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sue on November 13, 2006, 12:34:00 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Sue"
what ever happen about that remote viewer dude?
I thought that clown was going down to the island again


Is this the nutjob that Dave met at the hotel while he was in Aruba and decided that he wasnt going to deal with him when the guy asked for a personal item of Natalee's?


I dont know anything about that, But there was some Ex military dude
that claimed he had some devise that could find natalee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 13, 2006, 12:34:22 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Sue"
what ever happen about that remote viewer dude?
I thought that clown was going down to the island again


Is this the nutjob that Dave met at the hotel while he was in Aruba and decided that he wasnt going to deal with him when the guy asked for a personal item of Natalee's?


I don't think so.  I think that was a different nut job.

The remote viewer guy's name escapes me but it came up later.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 12:34:57 PM
Are the Kalpoe's signing like the Walker Brothers:

THE SUN AIN"T GONNA SHINE ANYMORE

Emptiness is the place you're in
Nothin' to lose but no more to win
The sun ain't gonna shine anymore
The moon ain't gonna rise in the sky
The tears are always clouding your ey-eyes
When you're without love


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 12:40:36 PM
Well, lets not get all hopeful. We've been there before and been very disappointed. They just might be relooking at some stuff. I doubt if Aruba had one of those Eureka moments.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 12:42:12 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Sue"
what ever happen about that remote viewer dude?
I thought that clown was going down to the island again


Is this the nutjob that Dave met at the hotel while he was in Aruba and decided that he wasnt going to deal with him when the guy asked for a personal item of Natalee's?


I dont know anything about that, But there was some Ex military dude
that claimed he had some devise that could find natalee

The nutjob that Dave met w/ was a pyshic, the uncle of karish (or whatever his name was that is jurin's friend and was posting here a few weeks ago).

Then there was a guy who had a "divining rod" that could find human bones out at sea from the land.

then there is this remote viewer who says to look near the refinery


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 12:43:16 PM
then there is the robot remote viewer that says she is in an abandoned
septic tank

i hate them all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 13, 2006, 12:48:05 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Well, lets not get all hopeful. We've been there before and been very disappointed. They just might be relooking at some stuff. I doubt if Aruba had one of those Eureka moments.


I know Kat - and I agree.  We've been slapped so many times.  But we always say - What If...

Maybe DeVries has rattled enough cages...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sue on November 13, 2006, 12:49:42 PM
I just hope Holland find some that can bring the boys back in for questioning... I also wonder if Peter De Vries has talked to Holland
police or if they will even talk to him


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 12:57:07 PM
Too many ppl on Aruba want it to be someone other than J2K + P .
And, from F site, they had access to DeVries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 13, 2006, 01:00:13 PM
Quote from: "robots"
then there is the robot remote viewer that says she is in an abandoned
septic tank

i hate them all


People who have done nothing, tell the truth.

People who have nothing to hide say "search my house, my yard".  

People who have nothing to hide, hide nothing and insist on a polygraph.  

People who lie all the time about everything are usually guilty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:00:59 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "robots"
then there is the robot remote viewer that says she is in an abandoned
septic tank

i hate them all


People who have done nothing, tell the truth.

People who have nothing to hide say "search my house, my yard".  

People who have nothing to hide, hide nothing and insist on a polygraph.  

People who lie all the time about everything are usually guilty.


thats the FACT JACK

simple as pie

JORAN still can tell people how he got home  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 01:01:54 PM
I wonder if the Queen rattled any cages...so to speak.... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:02:58 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "robots"
then there is the robot remote viewer that says she is in an abandoned
septic tank

i hate them all


People who have done nothing, tell the truth.

People who have nothing to hide say "search my house, my yard".  

People who have nothing to hide, hide nothing and insist on a polygraph.  

People who lie all the time about everything are usually guilty.


thats the FACT JACK

simple as pie

JORAN still can tell people how he got home  8)


he has about 8 versions  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 01:04:19 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.

Hey Blah!
I thouight the same thing. I was just searching for it.  I thought I read it last week on FP and it was one of the 1st few posts on a thread, but can't find it.

Hi Monkeys!!!!!!


Found it.  Posted by Espionage on 11/12/06 in the comments on the DeVries FP post.    I can't copy & paste but it says:

Look toward the southwest.

It was a single fantom post there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 01:07:11 PM
Quote from: "robots"
from this point foward i will refer to Paulus as DOCTOR EVIL


just as i refer to the island as TOILET





 :twisted:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/drevilvds1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 01:08:21 PM
That should be 'phantom', but I think you understood what I meant... :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:08:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
from this point foward i will refer to Paulus as DOCTOR EVIL


just as i refer to the island as TOILET





 :twisted:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/drevilvds1.jpg)


thank you Klass

i was hoping you got the HINT.... you did not disappoint

he is EVIL, DOCTOR EVIL

thanks  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 01:09:01 PM
Klaas....what a talent you have....... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 13, 2006, 01:09:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
from this point foward i will refer to Paulus as DOCTOR EVIL


just as i refer to the island as TOILET





 :twisted:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/drevilvds1.jpg)


OMG!!!  ROFLMAO!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:10:17 PM
Joran is NUMBER 2 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 01:11:09 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.

Hey Blah!
I thouight the same thing. I was just searching for it.  I thought I read it last week on FP and it was one of the 1st few posts on a thread, but can't find it.

Hi Monkeys!!!!!!


Found it.  Posted by Espionage on 11/12/06 in the comments on the DeVries FP post.    I can't copy & paste but it says:

Look toward the southwest.

It was a single phantom post there.


It's line 23...forgot to include that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 01:11:44 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.

Hey Blah!
I thouight the same thing. I was just searching for it.  I thought I read it last week on FP and it was one of the 1st few posts on a thread, but can't find it.

Hi Monkeys!!!!!!


Found it.  Posted by Espionage on 11/12/06 in the comments on the DeVries FP post.    I can't copy & paste but it says:

Look toward the southwest.

It was a single fantom post there.

2NJ,
Thank you!! You are great!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 01:11:50 PM
Quote from: "robots"
its not IF the truth comes out its WHEN it comes out

it will come out- BET the FARM on it
 

then i get to WATCH the GUILTY parties tell things like this

"im sorry" and then they will become "RELIGIOUS"

im not SMASHING religion by any means,,, i just hate it when people
"CONVERT"  when it is convenient for them

i call it a a LOAD of BULLCRAP
 8)

I agree.  If they didn't feel remorse all this time they aren't going to feel it now.  Joran never felt remorse for his actions and I mean never.  Just because in one of his statements it says he was showing emotion do not believe it.  Look who was taking the statement (Van der Straaten).  I could actually see Van der Straaten writing that part in himself because he knows Joran is cold.

That friggin island treated him like a hero when he came out of jail.  I'm surprised they didn't roll out the red carpet for him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 01:12:45 PM
(quote from aruba.com)
Balashi
While driving down to Pos Chiquito, along the southwest shores, take a left and drive through historic Frenchman's Pass, a narrow canyon in the rocks with hundreds of chattering parakeets and birds in residence.

Nearby is the Balashi gold mill ruins at the tip of the Spanish Lagoon, which is nearby the world's second-largest water desalination plant.

Any idea who owns/runs or is in charge of the water desalination plant??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 01:18:21 PM
Paul as Dr. Evil-too funny! But where are Mini Me and Fat Bastard in the Aruban version?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:19:29 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Paul as Dr. Evil-too funny! But where are Mini Me and Fat Bastard in the Aruban version?


there is a REAL FAT BASTARD on the island, i forget his name

but he is a BASTARD and he is FAT  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 13, 2006, 01:20:47 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Paul as Dr. Evil-too funny! But where are Mini Me and Fat Bastard in the Aruban version?


there is a REAL FAT BASTARD on the island, i forget his name

but he is a BASTARD and he is FAT  8)


Dennis jacobs....


your welcome :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:21:35 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Paul as Dr. Evil-too funny! But where are Mini Me and Fat Bastard in the Aruban version?


there is a REAL FAT BASTARD on the island, i forget his name

but he is a BASTARD and he is FAT  8)


Dennis jacobs....


your welcome :lol:


yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..
thats his name... thank you  :D

in my head i just refer to him as FAT WEASEL  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 01:23:11 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/316.jpg)

Click here for the larger version:
 :lol:
http://www.bucuticam.com/album2/gallery.php?entry=Images/316.zoom2.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: shadow on November 13, 2006, 01:23:13 PM
WATER EN ENERGIEBEDRIJF ARUBA (W.E.B.) N.V.
Balashi W.E.B. 76
SANTA CRUZ
Tel: (297) 5854600
Fax: (297) 5857681
Business Category: Water & Electricity Products/Distribution


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 01:23:40 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Paul as Dr. Evil-too funny! But where are Mini Me and Fat Bastard in the Aruban version?

Dennis Jacobs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 01:25:06 PM
Just a quick drop in to clarify something...If I am not mistaken, I could be so don't hold me to this, the remote viewer said that Natalee was in the water just off shore from the refinery.  I may have my directions wrong, but would that not be the southwest part of the island? Near the area of the bloody mattress?  Okay, I maybe I am wrong.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 01:27:43 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Just a quick drop in to clarify something...If I am not mistaken, I could be so don't hold me to this, the remote viewer said that Natalee was in the water just off shore from the refinery.  I may have my directions wrong, but would that not be the southwest part of the island? Near the area of the bloody mattress?  Okay, I maybe I am wrong.  :roll:


That would be the SouthEAST side of the island :wink:

Edited to correct - the remove viewer was looking at the SouthWest side of the island near the Refinery.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 01:30:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Just a quick drop in to clarify something...If I am not mistaken, I could be so don't hold me to this, the remote viewer said that Natalee was in the water just off shore from the refinery.  I may have my directions wrong, but would that not be the southwest part of the island? Near the area of the bloody mattress?  Okay, I maybe I am wrong.  :roll:


That would be the SouthEAST side of the island :wink:


Oh I am sorry, I have my directions wrong...much forgiveness Oh Wise One.  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on November 13, 2006, 01:32:25 PM
Hiya Monkeys

Oh looky at all the tourists..LOL 14 counting the blow up doll    :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 01:44:35 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Joran is NUMBER 2 :twisted:

Hey robots!!

here's jurin.
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/nmauimikee/mrhanky.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: hubbylove on November 13, 2006, 01:45:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
from this point foward i will refer to Paulus as DOCTOR EVIL


just as i refer to the island as TOILET





 :twisted:


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/drevilvds1.jpg)


hahahahahahaha!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Klaas you are too much!  I guess I need to read back and figure out what you guys are talking about.  We were very busy with the puppies this weekend!

I added a link in my sig line to the puppy post.  I'll be adding more pics tomorrow.  They are getting cuter everyday!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 01:49:23 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "robots"
Joran is NUMBER 2 :twisted:

Hey robots!!

here's jurin.
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/nmauimikee/mrhanky.jpg)


lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 01:53:59 PM
NORTHWEST = Lighthouse/Rocks/Arashi Beach/Hotels

SOUTHWEST = Baby Beach and the Refinery near the location the bloody mattress, foam with teeth marks, lysol bottle found.  Also not far from Lorenzo's home and the International School of Aruba.

SOUTHEAST = Near the cave area that Pitbull was found murdered



(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/DirectionsArubaLocations.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 01:56:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Just a quick drop in to clarify something...If I am not mistaken, I could be so don't hold me to this, the remote viewer said that Natalee was in the water just off shore from the refinery.  I may have my directions wrong, but would that not be the southwest part of the island? Near the area of the bloody mattress?  Okay, I maybe I am wrong.  :roll:


That would be the SouthEAST side of the island :wink:


Oh I am sorry, I have my directions wrong...much forgiveness Oh Wise One.  :wink:  :wink:


I just corrected myself - you were correct..SouthWest


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 01:56:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/316.jpg)

Click here for the larger version:
 :lol:
http://www.bucuticam.com/album2/gallery.php?entry=Images/316.zoom2.jpg



Who is that? Monkeys?  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 01:59:47 PM
I can't stay. Gotta get back to work, but do we know any monkeys in Aruba right now?  

Somebody knows us.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 02:03:56 PM
pssst...the sign says "Hello monkeys."
I can't read the one the person in the chaise is holding up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 02:06:11 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
pssst...the sign says "Hello monkeys."
I can't read the one the person in the chaise is holding up.

Yeah, I saw that.  I have no idea who is in Aruba right now or who is holding that "Hello Monkeys" sign.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 02:07:56 PM
Well, I hope they're working, cuz monkey friends should be boycotting, otherwise.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 02:11:19 PM
Hi Memphis!
I think we have Monkeys everywhere.
the 2 women on our left are hold 3 small signs. I think one says SEND BEER, another SEND MONEY, and can't read the 3rd.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 02:11:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
pssst...the sign says "Hello monkeys."
I can't read the one the person in the chaise is holding up.

Yeah, I saw that.  I have no idea who is in Aruba right now or who is holding that "Hello Monkeys" sign.


How about the one holding up the 'blow up' doll and giving the finger :twisted: Great tourists :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 02:14:56 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
pssst...the sign says "Hello monkeys."
I can't read the one the person in the chaise is holding up.

Yeah, I saw that.  I have no idea who is in Aruba right now or who is holding that "Hello Monkeys" sign.


How about the one holding up the 'blow up' doll and giving the finger :twisted: Great tourists :roll:


Maybe that's the only "girl" who would go to Aruba with him.... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 02:15:53 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Hi Memphis!
I think we have Monkeys everywhere.
the 2 women on our left are hold 3 small signs. I think one says SEND BEER, another SEND MONEY, and can't read the 3rd.


That third sign looks like it says SEND MERE.  :shock:     :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 02:17:58 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "NM"
Hi Memphis!
I think we have Monkeys everywhere.
the 2 women on our left are hold 3 small signs. I think one says SEND BEER, another SEND MONEY, and can't read the 3rd.


That third sign looks like it says SEND MERE.  :shock:     :lol:


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 02:18:13 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "NM"
Hi Memphis!
I think we have Monkeys everywhere.
the 2 women on our left are hold 3 small signs. I think one says SEND BEER, another SEND MONEY, and can't read the 3rd.


That third sign looks like it says SEND MERE.  :shock:     :lol:

NO WAY. She stays here!  by the way go one MeMere!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 02:18:57 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "NM"
Hi Memphis!
I think we have Monkeys everywhere.
the 2 women on our left are hold 3 small signs. I think one says SEND BEER, another SEND MONEY, and can't read the 3rd.


That third sign looks like it says SEND MERE.  :shock:     :lol:

NO WAY. She stays here!  by the way go one MeMere!!

Ment to say GOOD ONE MEMERE!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 02:18:57 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "NM"
Hi Memphis!
I think we have Monkeys everywhere.
the 2 women on our left are hold 3 small signs. I think one says SEND BEER, another SEND MONEY, and can't read the 3rd.


That third sign looks like it says SEND MERE.  :shock:     :lol:


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



 :lol:  :lol:
It does, but I guess that would be taking things out of context just a little.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 02:23:52 PM
memphis...you made me get out the magnifying glass....don't see my name on any of the signs....!  Whew....feel better now.... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 02:27:31 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
pssst...the sign says "Hello monkeys."
I can't read the one the person in the chaise is holding up.

Yeah, I saw that.  I have no idea who is in Aruba right now or who is holding that "Hello Monkeys" sign.


How about the one holding up the 'blow up' doll and giving the finger :twisted: Great tourists :roll:

Those aren't any monkeys we know. FAS = Fetal Alcohol Syndrome
The blow up doll, we  ( me ) had a big rant over that one. I never heard from the marketing co. that is in charge of Carlos & Charlies. Or Carlos & Charlies. I think they is " giving us the finger , sort of ".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 02:30:22 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
memphis...you made me get out the magnifying glass....don't see my name on any of the signs....!  Whew....feel better now.... :D


You're awake now, huh?  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 02:36:49 PM
I believe that they are those strange and demented ppl from that other blog. The one that is on the bad side of town.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 02:38:42 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I can't stay. Gotta get back to work, but do we know any monkeys in Aruba right now?  

Somebody knows us.   :wink:



THAT IS FU%KED UP GUYS.....

maybe something will happen soon.........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 02:43:05 PM
The blow up doll.......is...kinda freaky :shock:   imo....


i guess they stopped short of dressing her up like NH?

wackos..... :shock: where is my gun??


see u monkeys later


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 13, 2006, 02:47:59 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I believe that they are those strange and demented ppl from that other blog. The one that is on the bad side of town.


Thanks Kat_Gram!

That was my thinking as well (including your explanations in the previous post :wink: ).

It does make me smile :lol:  Their undies must be real twisted to take time out of their day to do that :lol:  :lol: Do they think they are advertising tourism  :lol:

Go Peter DeVries! You're making all the rats dance :lol:  :lol:


Meanwhile -- I've never seen tourist season begin as early and as forceful as it has in South Florida this year. AMAZING that other areas are experiencing such downturns :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 13, 2006, 03:00:36 PM
Those stupid people in the beachcam.  Had they just put on their bathing suits and acted as if they were tourists frolicking on the beach, it would have done more for their cause.  BUT NOOOO....
They donned their bathing suits and grabbed their blow-up doll and handmade signs to show the world that only locals and not one tourist is occupying Bucuti Beach now.  What idiots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 03:26:03 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Those stupid people in the beachcam.  Had they just put on their bathing suits and acted as if they were tourists frolicking on the beach, it would have done more for their cause.  BUT NOOOO....
They donned their bathing suits and grabbed their blow-up doll and handmade signs to show the world that only locals and not one tourist is occupying Bucuti Beach now.  What idiots.

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 03:38:35 PM
Per MF at FOB when asked if De Vries was still in Aruba:

Up to this weekend De Vries and his team of camera were still on Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 03:42:17 PM
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 03:43:57 PM
:lol:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/8ballJuliaRenfroLiar.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 13, 2006, 03:47:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
:lol:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/8ballJuliaRenfroLiar.jpg)


ROFL.....Klaas can you send Mrs. Red my email for me? Please.  TIA.

Hey Monkeys, will be back this evening. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 03:50:08 PM
Crazymom - do me a favor and email me again at smklaasend@hotmail.com

I just cleaned out a bunch of my old emails and I may not have yours any more.

Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 13, 2006, 04:01:00 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.

From the article referenced above:
In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity."

Wasn't it Satish who said in his statement that "Joran is crazy"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 04:09:09 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.

Hey Blah!
I thouight the same thing. I was just searching for it.  I thought I read it last week on FP and it was one of the 1st few posts on a thread, but can't find it.

Hi Monkeys!!!!!!


Found it.  Posted by Espionage on 11/12/06 in the comments on the DeVries FP post.    I can't copy & paste but it says:

Look toward the southwest.

It was a single fantom post there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 04:13:18 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Another interresting tidbit.  Yesterday at BFN someone posted something about looking at the Southwest end of the island.  The post was deleted...not sure why.


Someone posted the same thing here recently - I think it was on the front page.

Hey Blah!
I thouight the same thing. I was just searching for it.  I thought I read it last week on FP and it was one of the 1st few posts on a thread, but can't find it.

Hi Monkeys!!!!!!


Found it.  Posted by Espionage on 11/12/06 in the comments on the DeVries FP post.    I can't copy & paste but it says:

Look toward the southwest.

It was a single fantom post there.


Sorry forgot to post my comment about this psot brought over from BFN. I saw it shortly after it was posted, and recall qanother poster from there refering to Espionage as MIP6 . so for what it's worth....he may have adopted an alias after the recent blog discussions about him. Not sure how he might have any info and be able to say anything about Looking to the southwest or whatever.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 04:30:36 PM
Does anyone have any idea what this short blurb in Diario might say?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Cantante no a comete suicidio

ORANJESTAD.(AAN); Diasabra tabata circula rumornan cu e cantante hoben cu recientemente a keda deteni relaciona cu un accidente serio y fatal lo a comete suicidio.

Pero mesora e informe a keda desmenti via medionan oficial y nan ta lamenta cu tin personanan cu ta lanta y plama informenan doloroso pa famia di e hoben.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 04:37:27 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Does anyone have any idea what this short blurb in Diario might say?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Cantante no a comete suicidio

ORANJESTAD.(AAN); Diasabra tabata circula rumornan cu e cantante hoben cu recientemente a keda deteni relaciona cu un accidente serio y fatal lo a comete suicidio.

Pero mesora e informe a keda desmenti via medionan oficial y nan ta lamenta cu tin personanan cu ta lanta y plama informenan doloroso pa famia di e hoben.


I saw that this morning and tried running it through the pap translator.  Wasn't much help, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 04:40:49 PM
It didn't help me much either......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 04:43:46 PM
Bleached,
thanks for the info on espionage.

As far as what that blurb says my guess based on the word suicido means there was another murder in aruba.

I just thought of a new sloagan for aruba
You can not get murdered in aruba, b/c it is suicide to come here! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 13, 2006, 04:44:06 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Does anyone have any idea what this short blurb in Diario might say?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Cantante no a comete suicidio

ORANJESTAD.(AAN); Diasabra tabata circula rumornan cu e cantante hoben cu recientemente a keda deteni relaciona cu un accidente serio y fatal lo a comete suicidio.

Pero mesora e informe a keda desmenti via medionan oficial y nan ta lamenta cu tin personanan cu ta lanta y plama informenan doloroso pa famia di e hoben.


I ran it through a Spanish/English translator and got this:

Singer to does not commit suicide
ORANJESTAD.(AAN); Tabata Diasabra circulates rumornan cu and singer deteni hoben cu to keda recently relates cu a serious accident and fatal the a commits suicide.

It appears that a rumor circulated that a singer committed suicide, but it was a serious accident that was fatal.  Is this close?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 04:52:03 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Bleached,
thanks for the info on espionage.

As far as what that blurb says my guess based on the word suicido means there was another murder in aruba.

I just thought of a new sloagan for aruba
You can not get murdered in aruba, b/c it is suicide to come here! 8)


That's a good one NM ! Maybe I should consider changing my sig. line... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 04:54:31 PM
AZLady, I'm no expert, but your translation makes sense.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 04:57:05 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.

From the article referenced above:
In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity."

Wasn't it Satish who said in his statement that "Joran is crazy"?


Yes.

SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: NM on November 13, 2006, 05:05:38 PM
thanks Bleached!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:07:00 PM
San wrote;
Quote
Yes.

SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”


There were others who also made comments about Jorans strange personality/affect. I think it was Dompig who said something about his ability to make himself seem like "gods gift to mother-inlaws" or something like that. Then an FBI member who viewed some part of Jorans interrogations made a comment about him being the strangest (not sure if that is the exact word used ) suspect he had ever witnessed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 05:08:20 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.

From the article referenced above:
In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity."

Wasn't it Satish who said in his statement that "Joran is crazy"?


Yes.

SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”




he was CHOKING her.........

k2 are weasels that saw it happen


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:12:29 PM
"Dompig is also quoted as saying van der Sloot, the prime suspect, struck Aruban authorities and the FBI as the type of guy who was a "mother-in-law's God's gift."

"I don't know," Twitty said. "But I remember specifically in a meeting (with authorities that) they were saying this is the most unusual man they had ever dealt with. They had never seen anyone who has just refused to cooperate with the authorities. He really toyed with them during the interrogations, and quite often would place his fingers in his ears and just refuse to speak."

http://tinyurl.com/yyswg2


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 05:15:11 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.

From the article referenced above:
In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity."

Wasn't it Satish who said in his statement that "Joran is crazy"?


Yes.

SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”




he was CHOKING her.........

k2 are weasels that saw it happen

I sort of thought that as soon as they got away from C & C's on a deserted road, he attacked her in a sexual way. And not French Kissing.
When you read his statement, he KNEW she wanted to have sex with him just by her body language. Holy, one of those kind of perverts. A girl smiles at him or is friendly and she wants sex ? Poor Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:19:55 PM
You are right Kat_Gram . There has to be something psychiatrically wrong with the guy. I don't know if he's a pervert or on what level it is......but simply the fact that Natalee is still missing, and he has gone all this time with it on his conscience-the act of the matter is he has no conscience, and has done nothing but lie. A true sociopath......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 05:23:06 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.

From the article referenced above:
In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity."

Wasn't it Satish who said in his statement that "Joran is crazy"?


Yes.

SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”




he was CHOKING her.........

k2 are weasels that saw it happen

I sort of thought that as soon as they got away from C & C's on a deserted road, he attacked her in a sexual way. And not French Kissing.
When you read his statement, he KNEW she wanted to have sex with him just by her body language. Holy, one of those kind of perverts. A girl smiles at him or is friendly and she wants sex ? Poor Natalee.




yep, when the K brother said "joran is crazy"

he was referring to something that was hurting Natalee


simple as pie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 13, 2006, 05:25:52 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"

Sorry forgot to post my comment about this psot brought over from BFN. I saw it shortly after it was posted, and recall qanother poster from there refering to Espionage as MIP6 . so for what it's worth....he may have adopted an alias after the recent blog discussions about him. Not sure how he might have any info and be able to say anything about Looking to the southwest or whatever.......

FWIW...here is the exchange;

espionage posted >>  There is a secluded location on the southwestern portion of the island that needs exploration.

MIP6 responds >> It's being checked "Robert".

igsigs responds >> Being checked? Is this a new lead or tip?

ALL 3 posts then removed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:32:31 PM
Can't understand the posts being removed. That doesn't sit well with me, among other things.... :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 05:35:30 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Can't understand the posts being removed. That doesn't sit well with me, among other things.... :cry:

Well, who could remove the posts ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 05:41:07 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~mcafee/Bin/sb.html

Here is a description of sociopath.
Many of the points fit Joran. By his own admission.

From the article referenced above:
In the 1830's this disorder was called "moral insanity."

Wasn't it Satish who said in his statement that "Joran is crazy"?


Yes.

SATISH'S 6/24/05 STATEMENT:

"then I saw this and I said to Deepak, Joran is crazy”



he was CHOKING her.........

k2 are weasels that saw it happen

Yes I agree he either could have been choking her or hitting her.  I believe she fought back and got a few good shots in (scratches/bruise on his face).  This is one of the reasons they needed to give him 10 days because he needed the marks to go away.  Dr. Baden mentioned this on Greta one evening that he had the scratches and 10 days was enough time for him to heal.  I remember the first picture of Joran in the police car and he was hiding his face with a towel.

There is no reason to hide if you are innocent.  He is as violent as they come.  Bo Dietel said he had evil in him.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/13_27_060905_aruba_suspect.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:41:33 PM
Well anyone can delete their own posts for one thing. But then if the post was quoted by another poster...say in a follow-up, which was the case here....it should have remained. It didn't I checked. So, 1) each poster had to delete their post. 2) poster could have written to moderator and asked for post(s) to be deleted. 3) moderator/admin could delete posts as they see fit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 13, 2006, 05:44:13 PM
Just a quick check-in to see if anything is happening.  I've been at the razor-wire factory today (Criminal Court) for jury duty.  Not on a jury, but I'm tired and sore.  I did earn $17.20 though!   :shock:

Odd that those posts were removed.  :?  I'll have to read back a bit after dinner.  Good to see the monkeys are at their posts and hard at work!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 05:45:28 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
You are right Kat_Gram . There has to be something psychiatrically wrong with the guy. I don't know if he's a pervert or on what level it is......but simply the fact that Natalee is still missing, and he has gone all this time with it on his conscience-the act of the matter is he has no conscience, and has done nothing but lie. A true sociopath......

I agree and Paulus and Anita help him think he did nothing wrong.  They built this mad man up even more.  He is a danger to society.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:46:07 PM
San wrote;
Quote
Yes I agree he either could have been choking her or hitting her. I believe she fought back and got a few good shots in (scratches/bruise on his face). This is one of the reasons they needed to give him 10 days because he needed the marks to go away. Dr. Baden mentioned this on Greta one evening that he had the scratches and 10 days was enough time for him to heal. I remember the first picture of Joran in the police car and he was hiding his face with a towel.


I personally think they used the GHB as a chemical way of restraining Natalee. Remember this is their MO, at least 20 times before......they drove around and let the drugs take full effect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 13, 2006, 05:46:33 PM
Quote from: San
Yes I agree he either could have been choking her or hitting her.  I believe she fought back and got a few good shots in (scratches/bruise on his face).  This is one of the reasons they needed to give him 10 days because he needed the marks to go away.  Dr. Baden mentioned this on Greta one evening that he had the scratches and 10 days was enough time for him to heal.  I remember the first picture of Joran in the police car and he was hiding his face with a towel.

There is no reason to hide if you are innocent.  He is as violent as they come.  Bo Dietel said he had evil in him.


I agree with Bo.  Something wrong with that boy IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 05:48:38 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
San wrote;
Quote
Yes I agree he either could have been choking her or hitting her. I believe she fought back and got a few good shots in (scratches/bruise on his face). This is one of the reasons they needed to give him 10 days because he needed the marks to go away. Dr. Baden mentioned this on Greta one evening that he had the scratches and 10 days was enough time for him to heal. I remember the first picture of Joran in the police car and he was hiding his face with a towel.


I personally think they used the GHB as a chemical way of restraining Natalee. Remember this is their MO, at least 20 times before......they drove around and let the drugs take full effect.

Oh with out a doubt she was drugged.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:49:14 PM
I know it is so sad........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 05:53:58 PM
I came across this interesting post....it was under the comment section, SM FP, June 26th 2005. See what you think.......

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

One post made yesterday by Simian was a confirmation for me that he’s got legit inside information. At 4:04 pm he posted: Simian Says:

June 26th, 2005 at 4:04 pm
The wire has been shaken. The bird has left.

When news broke at around 6 pm that elder VDS had been ordered released by the judge and had been alreasy released from custody, it seemed clear to me that Simian knew this at 4:04.

Comment by new girl | June 27, 2005, 12:34 pm

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/06/27/mountain-brook-community-turns-out-for-natalee-holloway/#comments


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 06:09:02 PM
Nobody's into the old Simian posts huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 06:16:56 PM
Klaas, a short while back there were pics posted and discussion of a friend of Jorans, kinda effiminate looking, big big house......resembled this one. Maybe another rat deserting the sinking ship....

http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 06:19:06 PM
Is this Hiram's house?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 06:30:31 PM
Yes, I think that was his name. Last name Meisner? Does that house look the same to you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 06:36:41 PM
The house " Ready for occupancy after August 16, 2005"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 06:38:14 PM
Hmmm, maybe they bought it then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 06:48:54 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Klaas, a short while back there were pics posted and discussion of a friend of Jorans, kinda effiminate looking, big big house......resembled this one. Maybe another rat deserting the sinking ship....

http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html


That does sort of look like Hiram's house  :shock:

http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/11-06-05happybirthhiram/pag2.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 06:49:58 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Yes, I think that was his name. Last name Meisner? Does that house look the same to you?


Hiram Vrolijk

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=dCDA9.MSEDrmpo2q


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 06:53:40 PM
Thanks Klaasend . I am always bad with names. Well how did you like my Avatar trial ? Which one was cuter spiderman with the squirrel on his head? or the llittle messed up monkey I have now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 07:04:14 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Thanks Klaasend . I am always bad with names. Well how did you like my Avatar trial ? Which one was cuter spiderman with the squirrel on his head? or the llittle messed up monkey I have now?

I kindof like this monkey in an abstract sort of way, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 13, 2006, 07:13:43 PM
If I had 3 million US dollars, I wouldn't be spending it on that house in that location!
http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 07:43:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Thanks Klaasend . I am always bad with names. Well how did you like my Avatar trial ? Which one was cuter spiderman with the squirrel on his head? or the llittle messed up monkey I have now?

I kindof like this monkey in an abstract sort of way, lol  :lol:


Well thanks , I know he's kinda wierd.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 13, 2006, 07:43:41 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "klaasend"
http://www.bucuticam.com/album2/gallery.php?entry=Images/316.zoom2.jpg

Who is that? Monkeys?  :D


 My guess is that they are some of the freaks who inhabit that cesspool, and are trying to make it appear that they actually have tourists down there.  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kathya0427 on November 13, 2006, 07:45:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kathya0427"
this has been an extremely interesting thread...you guys are awesome...it has taken to a long time tonight to read this topic...but it was well worth the time...

Thanks Kathya!  How did you like my Three Stooges?  :lol:


klassend...I loved the three stooges...very fitting...I also love all the other things you do...like the suspects in all the funny cars...etc...you are talented at doing all this stuff...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 08:09:55 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "klaasend"
http://www.bucuticam.com/album2/gallery.php?entry=Images/316.zoom2.jpg

Who is that? Monkeys?  :D


 My guess is that they are some of the freaks who inhabit that cesspool, and are trying to make it appear that they actually have tourists down there.  :roll:  :roll:
The guy with the doll. He is a winner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 13, 2006, 08:47:03 PM
San - I agree, JoranVanDerSloot is a major menace to society in the making. Is still a teenager yet he's showing overwhelming evidence of a mature and experienced sexual predator much like the Ted Bundys and John Coughys.  His getting away with kidnapping, raping and murdering Natalee and the ALE covering it up, only feeds his sick ego to make him think he's untouchable.  He basks in the celebrity of being infamous.

Someday when society has had it's fill of this monster and he's all of a sudden gone, I hope science has acces to his brain to study what makes these beasts the monsters that they are.  

Robots rocks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 08:52:17 PM
http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html

I believe this house is Michael Posner's
It went on sale 8/05
$3 Million
Fully furnished
R.E. agent was from Michigan

Next door is Hiram V's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 08:54:18 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I came across this interesting post....it was under the comment section, SM FP, June 26th 2005. See what you think.......

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

One post made yesterday by Simian was a confirmation for me that he’s got legit inside information. At 4:04 pm he posted: Simian Says:

June 26th, 2005 at 4:04 pm
The wire has been shaken. The bird has left.

When news broke at around 6 pm that elder VDS had been ordered released by the judge and had been alreasy released from custody, it seemed clear to me that Simian knew this at 4:04.

It's been said that SIMIAN is an Aruban with relatives in ALE.....
Comment by new girl | June 27, 2005, 12:34 pm

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/06/27/mountain-brook-community-turns-out-for-natalee-holloway/#comments


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 08:55:33 PM
About the scratches on Joran's face. I still think like a citizen of a different country that Aruba. So, it's hard for me to see that if there were scratches that they wouldn't have been noticed. But, given that we are speaking of Aruba, this is possible. He says she pushed him away. Maybe there were other marks ( bruises ) on Joran that he was trying to account for, just in case anyone looked. Before June 9. Every lie that he told was for a reason.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 08:58:35 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
About the scratches on Joran's face. I still think like a citizen of a different country that Aruba. So, it's hard for me to see that if there were scratches that they wouldn't have been noticed. But, given that we are speaking of Aruba, this is possible. He says she pushed him away. Maybe there were other marks ( bruises ) on Joran that he was trying to account for, just in case anyone looked. Before June 9. Every lie that he told was for a reason.

I meant THAN ARUBA
Agree Indy Dan. But the rest of them are pretty evil and vile for participating in the protection of him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 09:05:55 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html

I believe this house is Michael Posner's
It went on sale 8/05
$3 Million
Fully furnished
R.E. agent was from Michigan

Next door is Hiram V's.

I think Grande may have Posner's Aruba address, I'll see if I can ask him.

Where does it say the RE Agent is from Michigan?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 09:18:01 PM
Area code, I looked it up is Michigan. That was the phone number for the contact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Mere on November 13, 2006, 09:18:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html

I believe this house is Michael Posner's
It went on sale 8/05
$3 Million
Fully furnished
R.E. agent was from Michigan

Next door is Hiram V's.

I think Grande may have Posner's Aruba address, I'll see if I can ask him.

Where does it say the RE Agent is from Michigan?


Klaas....contact is area code 248 = Pontiac, Michigan


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 09:18:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Where does it say the RE Agent is from Michigan?


Way down on the bottom of page 1
Sherry Hass
R.E. Agent
W. Bloomfield, Michigan
(Detroit area)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 09:21:56 PM
FACT:
Louis Posner.....Hiram V.......Michael Posner?
All next to each other


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 09:22:23 PM
NEW STICKY IN THE IMPORTANT CASE DOCUMENT FORUM:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=539

JUNE 9-11, 2005 - THE DISTURBING EVENTS SURROUNDING THE NATALEE HOLLOWAY CASE IN ARUBA


Compiled and produced by members of Blogs for Natalee and The Jury-Box


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 09:24:12 PM
Hey Grande! Whacha been working on?  :D

I'm interested.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 09:45:18 PM
is DOCTOR EVIL working these days ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 09:52:38 PM
June 2005  On another board someone posted this:

I am alive, still on the Island.
I am being held within sight
of the California Lighthouse.
The building is more than one story.
my hair is black.
I feel like I was druged,
I can see the lighthouse.


When questioned about it, he said he was Hiram V. from Aruba
He gave his address as proof of who he was...
The address matches Hiram's.

He lives between Louis "Aloe" Posner & the "$3 million For Sale Villa"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 09:57:27 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Hey Grande! Whacha been working on?  :D

I'm interested.  :D


Just plugging away trying to break through.  

Good to see you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:08:17 PM
After 18 months, I don't care who says not to post this photo.  I have been told that this is a surviellance photo of Lorenzo.  Doesn't the other man in this photo resemble PVDS??

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzonew3copy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:11:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
After 18 months, I don't care who says not to post this photo.  I have been told that this is a surviellance photo of Lorenzo.  Doesn't the other man in this photo resemble PVDS??

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzonew3copy.jpg)


IM GLAD YOU DID THAT.  I REALLY FELT WE SHOULD DISCUSS THIS IMAGE.  I do not think that is Paulus.  I know the woman on his left is not Astrid, atleast that it what I have been told.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:11:36 PM
No, the guy dosen't look like PVDS to me. Too much grey hair and too curly I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:12:12 PM
Florida, can I post the white van image?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:12:22 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
No, the guy dosen't look like PVDS to me. Too much grey hair and too curly I think.

I don't think the hair is grey or curly in this photo.  Just think it's the shadows of the plants.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 10:12:22 PM
Is there an extra leg in there ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 10:13:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
No, the guy dosen't look like PVDS to me. Too much grey hair and too curly I think.

I don't think the hair is grey or curly in this photo.  Just think it's the shadows of the plants.

I agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:13:56 PM
White van possibly Lorenzo's

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Lorenzowhitevan.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzowhitevan2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:14:40 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Is there an extra leg in there ?

No, what I think we are seeing is the womans handbag and Lorenzo's left leg.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:15:31 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Florida, can I post the white van image?


I just posted it.  Tired of sitting on this stuff, it's been 18 months!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:15:49 PM
KLAASEND:  I don't know who told you not to post that photo....
It's been posted in many forums.

It was given to me by Art Wood to compare who we saw in Aruba as Lorenzo.

Not sure who the "couple" is....Not Paulus or Astrid.
The lanterns match those on Lorenzo's property.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:15:59 PM
IMO Klaas, it does resemble PVDS, but can't be sure......hair seems alittle full on top.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 10:16:00 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Is there an extra leg in there ?

No, it is his leg.
Can't tell who these ppl are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:16:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Is there an extra leg in there ?

No, what I think we are seeing is the womans handbag and Lorenzo's left leg.


I agree on the handbag and leg, but still disagree on the hair and the guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:17:14 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
KLAASEND:  I don't know who told you not to post that photo....
It's been posted in many forums.

It was given to me by Art Wood to compare who we saw in Aruba as Lorenzo.

Not sure who the "couple" is....Not Paulus or Astrid.
The lanterns match those on Lorenzo's property.

Yes, I know it's been posted on many boards.  I was just trying no honor a request.  I don't believe that is Astrid either but I still say the man resembles PVDS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:18:19 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Is there an extra leg in there ?

No, it is his leg.
Can't tell who these ppl are.


I had read about some speculation that a fourth person may have been photoshopped out of the pic


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:18:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html

I believe this house is Michael Posner's
It went on sale 8/05
$3 Million
Fully furnished
R.E. agent was from Michigan

Next door is Hiram V's.

I think Grande may have Posner's Aruba address, I'll see if I can ask him.

Where does it say the RE Agent is from Michigan?


"No.  Posner doesn't own a home, he rents.  And I do not know the Vrolijk's home.  Caya Bunita Bista #14 is in Bella Vista up on a hillside lot and is across the street from Ido's house.  #14 is next to Gandleman's lot #13 and  Gandleman has not built as of yet.
 
But Posner did sell his lot in La Colina to Hamilton from Nevada.  I was working with Hamilton on his home for almost a year when he had problems with his architect and contractor and decided not to built.  Hamilton is selling his lot for $450,000.00 and that price includes the retaining wall that was completed in the summer.  At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton.  Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:18:44 PM
that is not PAULUS the SQUALUS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:19:44 PM
DOCTOR EVIL only wears WHITE SHIRTS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:20:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Grande"
Florida, can I post the white van image?


I just posted it.  Tired of sitting on this stuff, it's been 18 months!!


Im with you on that Klaas...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:20:46 PM
doctor EVIL has SHORT LEGS and is FATTER

much FATTER  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:20:52 PM
Grande - thanks for the Posner info

Robots - you are probably right, it just kindof resembles him to me and I wanted others opinions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:21:13 PM
GRANDE Quote:

"No. Posner doesn't own a home, he rents. And I do not know the Vrolijk's home. Caya Bunita Bista #14 is in Bella Vista up on a hillside lot and is across the street from Ido's house. #14 is next to Gandleman's lot #13 and Gandleman has not built as of yet.

Sorry, who is IDO and GANDLEMAN?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 13, 2006, 10:21:55 PM
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:22:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - thanks for the Posner info

Robots - you are probably right, it just kindof resembles him to me and I wanted others opinions.


klass, i agree it resembles him to some degree

but i really think DOCTOR EVIL is shorter and fatter and has less hair and

DOCTOR EVIL's hair is much greasier.....  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: "robots"
DOCTOR EVIL only wears WHITE SHIRTS  8)


Mr Robot, you are a trip.  :lol:   :lol:   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:22:57 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
GRANDE Quote:

"No. Posner doesn't own a home, he rents. And I do not know the Vrolijk's home. Caya Bunita Bista #14 is in Bella Vista up on a hillside lot and is across the street from Ido's house. #14 is next to Gandleman's lot #13 and Gandleman has not built as of yet.

Sorry, who is IDO and GANDLEMAN?


It would appear, outside of the Dutch government, those are the folks who own and operate the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:23:11 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:23:15 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
http://www.overseasrealestate.co.uk/Rest_of_world/aruba/aruba.html

I believe this house is Michael Posner's
It went on sale 8/05
$3 Million
Fully furnished
R.E. agent was from Michigan

Next door is Hiram V's.

I think Grande may have Posner's Aruba address, I'll see if I can ask him.

Where does it say the RE Agent is from Michigan?


"No.  Posner doesn't own a home, he rents.  And I do not know the Vrolijk's home.  Caya Bunita Bista #14 is in Bella Vista up on a hillside lot and is across the street from Ido's house.  #14 is next to Gandleman's lot #13 and  Gandleman has not built as of yet.
 
But Posner did sell his lot in La Colina to Hamilton from Nevada.  I was working with Hamilton on his home for almost a year when he had problems with his architect and contractor and decided not to built.  Hamilton is selling his lot for $450,000.00 and that price includes the retaining wall that was completed in the summer.  At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton.  Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."


BTW, Gandleman is the owner of the Jewelry store "Gandleman's Jewelers" in the Marriott where some have speculated that Natalee was seen in a verbal dispute with a male.  For the record, I don't buy that for one second.  I have tried to contact the Gandleman's for comment and recieved nothing in return.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:23:31 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:

Hi Mrs. Red - saw your assbites post on the front page, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 13, 2006, 10:24:42 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:26:04 PM
Quote GRANDE:

At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton. Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."

Are you saying you own property in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:26:50 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "robots"
DOCTOR EVIL only wears WHITE SHIRTS  8)


Mr Robot, you are a trip.  :lol:   :lol:   :lol:




well, thanks ----:)  

most people can put up with me for about 5 minutes and then i usually
hear " thats enough its time for you to go"


even my own family  :twisted:  

my philosophy is.....take the serious things SERIOUS and everything and everyone else is OPEN SEASON for a laugh or two.

i take the situation of Natalee Missing very serious and i hate all involved




forgiveness??


NOT for me to decide that one......i can hate em till the the COWS come home and i will continue to do so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:26:53 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote GRANDE:

At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton. Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."

Are you saying you own property in Aruba?

I believe Grande was referring to Nevada property.  Or maybe not, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:27:07 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
GRANDE Quote:

"No. Posner doesn't own a home, he rents. And I do not know the Vrolijk's home. Caya Bunita Bista #14 is in Bella Vista up on a hillside lot and is across the street from Ido's house. #14 is next to Gandleman's lot #13 and Gandleman has not built as of yet.

Sorry, who is IDO and GANDLEMAN?


I do not know who IDO is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:27:32 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:




nope, i was just teasing ya :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:27:50 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:


Yeah, but it's mostly stuff about ED meds and Stock Picks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 13, 2006, 10:29:11 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:


Yeah, but it's mostly stuff about ED meds and Stock Picks.


well Carnut you must email me about 100 times a day then!!   :lol:

anything I need to know about before I get out of here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:29:33 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote GRANDE:

At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton. Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."

Are you saying you own property in Aruba?


No, we have been through this, have we not?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:31:44 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:


Yeah, but it's mostly stuff about ED meds and Stock Picks.


What exchange Carnut?  NYSE, NASDAQ, Pink Sheets, Grey Sheets ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: lexie on November 13, 2006, 10:32:16 PM
Hello, all.
I have been reading most days, but not sitting long enough to post.  Some good discussions of late.  Am hoping that the rumor of something coming out is true...although we have heard that many times.  It is like the "case will be solved in 24 hours/48 hours.  I hope that the DeVries show is turning up the heat on some of those involved, or at least looking at the case without the need to protect anyone.  

Hope all is well with all the Monkeys.  Am off to catch up on my FP reading now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:32:23 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote GRANDE:

At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton. Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."

Are you saying you own property in Aruba?


No, we have been through this, have we not?


Well, I could see it was a quote, but it would have helped a bit as to it's attribution or some sort of explanation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:32:24 PM
Grande - I think Carnut was referring to the usual spam emails  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:32:25 PM
Nope, sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:33:14 PM
Quote from: "lexie"
Hello, all.
I have been reading most days, but not sitting long enough to post.  Some good discussions of late.  Am hoping that the rumor of something coming out is true...although we have heard that many times.  It is like the "case will be solved in 24 hours/48 hours.  I hope that the DeVries show is turning up the heat on some of those involved, or at least looking at the case without the need to protect anyone.  

Hope all is well with all the Monkeys.  Am off to catch up on my FP reading now.

Hi Lexie - good to see you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:33:17 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote GRANDE:

At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton. Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."

Are you saying you own property in Aruba?


No, we have been through this, have we not?


Nope, sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:34:06 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:


Yeah, but it's mostly stuff about ED meds and Stock Picks.


What exchange Carnut?  NYSE, NASDAQ, Pink Sheets, Grey Sheets ?


Heh, heh, you got me there. I don't know the first thing about the stock market other than what I see on Neil Cavuto's show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:36:45 PM
Quote from: "lexie"
Hello, all.
I have been reading most days, but not sitting long enough to post.  Some good discussions of late.  Am hoping that the rumor of something coming out is true...although we have heard that many times.  It is like the "case will be solved in 24 hours/48 hours.  I hope that the DeVries show is turning up the heat on some of those involved, or at least looking at the case without the need to protect anyone.  

Hope all is well with all the Monkeys.  Am off to catch up on my FP reading now.


Yes the De Vries show will be interesting one way or the other.

Don't really know how much he can come up with within the confines of a show's investigation and the amount of time he and his folks will be putting into it.

Sure do hope it's something real and positive from our point of view.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:38:08 PM
Well, dadgum, sure didn't think I hit that key twice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:39:11 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Well, dadgum, sure didn't think I hit that key twice.

I just deleted the double post.  The forum started lagging a bit when we started talking about Lorenzo  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:43:09 PM
whenever i see DOCTOR EVIL'S PICTURE on this BOARD i feel like
running and taking a LONG SHOWER and then getting some type of
EVIL REPELLENT

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:43:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
White van possibly Lorenzo's

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Lorenzowhitevan.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzowhitevan2.jpg)


COMPLIMENTS of "FLORIDA"
We had Astrid's address....There was this van parked in front of it.
We assumed it was Lorenzo's
We went to the rave ranch & took photos
On the way back, we passed an "interesting-looking" house
I got out & took pics
A little while later, we saw the purple/white van pass
& followed it right back to the house

At the end of the week, Art Wood confirmed what we saw.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 10:45:53 PM
And that was ? Florida ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 10:46:23 PM
Hi guys, I see you finally found Lorenzo...whew!  I was tired of knowing about that pic for so long too and not being able to say anything about it.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:47:15 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote GRANDE:

At the present time Konstruktiva is trying to purchase the lot from Hamilton. Lot #15 next to my home was on the market and now the owner, from North Carolina, is either going to built a spec house to sell or he will sell his lot for $475,000.00."

Are you saying you own property in Aruba?


No, we have been through this, have we not?


Well, I could see it was a quote, but it would have helped a bit as to it's attribution or some sort of explanation.



Carnut, I absolutely agree and I apologize for the hasty post.  I just recieved that information and simply copied and pasted due to the relevance it had to Florida's inquiry.  That is really all I can say at this point, but I assure you I am trying to get more details as we speak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:47:52 PM
i dont know the significance of the van

but it looks like the driver is wearing a face mask,,, just over his mouth
like a doctor would wear or the people in the aruba video were wearing


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:48:25 PM
All reported to be Lorenzo:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzonew3copy.jpg)
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzowhitevan2.jpg)
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/Lorenzowhitevan.jpg)
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Lorenzosvan-fullshot.jpg)
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/5c8cf778.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:49:14 PM
So is that a different van ya think? or did he paint over the earthquake .
I ask because the paint job sure looks crappy on that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:50:03 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
So is that a different van ya think? or did he paint over the earthquake .
I ask because the paint job sure looks crappy on that one.

Looks like a different van to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:50:09 PM
Klaasend you had my answer before I finished the question....now this is getting spooky!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:51:40 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Klaasend you had my answer before I finished the question....now this is getting spooky!

I'm a mind reader too, LOLOLOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 10:52:08 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i dont know the significance of the van

but it looks like the driver is wearing a face mask,,, just over his mouth
like a doctor would wear or the people in the aruba video were wearing

Could it be Michael Jackson :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:53:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
i dont know the significance of the van

but it looks like the driver is wearing a face mask,,, just over his mouth
like a doctor would wear or the people in the aruba video were wearing

Could it be Michael Jackson :lol:


LOL

oh gosh !!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 10:53:59 PM
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:54:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!


me either


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 10:55:44 PM
CARNUT: The pic of Lorenzo driving the VW van.....
He had just come out of a "deli" & for some reason had the white paper bag in his mouth......

Again, COMPLIMENTS of "FLORIDA"
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Astrid-1.jpg)
ASTRID VAN RIJN
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/LorenzoRaveRanch-3.jpg)
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/PurpleVan4.jpg)
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Jaraweg-1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:56:03 PM
me either


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 10:56:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!

Sounds like a Sloot to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 10:58:17 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!

Sounds like a Sloot to me.


you mean like DOCTOR EVIL'S son  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 10:58:26 PM
Humm, Astrid looks a lot like KJ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Grande on November 13, 2006, 10:58:47 PM
Night all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 10:59:48 PM
Seems odd to me that Lorenzo seems to have this need for a van.....with a windowless back?....seems like a work vehicle. What does he need to transport  without anyone seeing? I would think that he would likely drive a convertible 2 seater something....but that's just me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:00:05 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys... I hve been slammed at work so I am only in here for a few minutes. I have not even had the chance to read my emails.... so if I haven't responded to you it's because I am so insanely busy at work and when I get home, I don't want to even see a computer :shock:




i was wondering why you didnt respond to my emails  :wink:  :wink:


Did you really email me? :shock:


Yeah, but it's mostly stuff about ED meds and Stock Picks.


OMG! ROTFL!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:00:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!


I don't get it either.....

I think the MYTH was bigger than the PERSON

Who I saw was a healthy, attractive young guy.
Not the "MYSTERIOUS LORENZO"

I think there ARE parties & POSSIBLY he has "BLACKMAIL" on certain people that frequent his parties.

His late father was "best friends" with Paulus
Paul van Rijn killed himself....
Demons plagued him, as well as drugs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:00:37 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
CARNUT: The pic of Lorenzo driving the VW van.....
He had just come out of a "deli" & for some reason had the white paper bag in his mouth......

Again, COMPLIMENTS of "FLORIDA"
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Astrid-1.jpg)
ASTRID VAN RIJN


someone remind me again WHY Paulus chose Anita over this woman?  :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:01:28 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Humm, Astrid looks a lot like KJ.


Looks attractive......seems maybe Paulus type is thin, petite blondes?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 11:02:22 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Florida"
CARNUT: The pic of Lorenzo driving the VW van.....
He had just come out of a "deli" & for some reason had the white paper bag in his mouth......

Again, COMPLIMENTS of "FLORIDA"
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Astrid-1.jpg)
ASTRID VAN RIJN


someone remind me again WHY Paulus chose Anita over this woman?  :shock:  :lol:


Maybe is wasn't PVDS's choice?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:02:35 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
And that was ? Florida ?


AUGUST 2005


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:04:14 PM
Quote from: "robots"
DOCTOR EVIL only wears WHITE SHIRTS  8)


I agree with robots. The first thing I thought was Paulus doesn't dress like that. That man dresses like an American business man, not an Aruban business man. IMO

Thank you so much for posting that pic Klaas!
I've been wanting to see it for so long, but didn't want to put anyone on the spot by asking.  

"Lorenzo" looks pretty cleancut. That's not what I would have expected. I know looks can be deceiving, but that "Lorenzo" doesn't look so notorious. Again, JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:04:17 PM
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 11:04:22 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Humm, Astrid looks a lot like KJ.


Looks attractive......seems maybe Paulus type is thin, petite blondes?


Something musta really changed for AVDS then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Frijole on November 13, 2006, 11:04:45 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Florida"
CARNUT: The pic of Lorenzo driving the VW van.....
He had just come out of a "deli" & for some reason had the white paper bag in his mouth......

Again, COMPLIMENTS of "FLORIDA"
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Astrid-1.jpg)
ASTRID VAN RIJN


someone remind me again WHY Paulus chose Anita over this woman?  :shock:  :lol:


Larger dowry?   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:04:49 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
And that was ? Florida ?


AUGUST 2005


the Lorenzo enigma makes no sense I'm with you on that one Klaas

Carnut-

True she may have dropped Paulus, I just had to ask that question after all the don't you like my bra Anita photos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:05:44 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Night all!

Nite Grande


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 11:06:40 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Seems odd to me that Lorenzo seems to have this need for a van.....with a windowless back?....seems like a work vehicle. What does he need to transport  without anyone seeing? I would think that he would likely drive a convertible 2 seater something....but that's just me.


DRUGS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:07:48 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


I thought the rumors were that he is Lorenzo's biological father?  is that just rumor?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:08:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
So is that a different van ya think? or did he paint over the earthquake .
I ask because the paint job sure looks crappy on that one.

Looks like a different van to me.


i hate to ask....but what is Lorenzoes recent signifance agiain??

And Klass..nice job w/ Lorenzoes photo album!!! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 13, 2006, 11:08:10 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Florida"
CARNUT: The pic of Lorenzo driving the VW van.....
He had just come out of a "deli" & for some reason had the white paper bag in his mouth......

Again, COMPLIMENTS of "FLORIDA"
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Astrid-1.jpg)
ASTRID VAN RIJN


someone remind me again WHY Paulus chose Anita over this woman?  :shock:  :lol:

MONEY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:09:03 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!


I don't get it either.....

I think the MYTH was bigger than the PERSON

Who I saw was a healthy, attractive young guy.
Not the "MYSTERIOUS LORENZO"

I think there ARE parties & POSSIBLY he has "BLACKMAIL" on certain people that frequent his parties.

His late father was "best friends" with Paulus
Paul van Rijn killed himself....
Demons plagued him, as well as drugs.


He was one of the first people afther JK2 and the Security Guards that was brought in for questioning.  There is a reason for that.  Either he is involved in some way or he knows something.  I don't give a crap how wholesome looking he is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:09:42 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "lexie"
Hello, all.
I have been reading most days, but not sitting long enough to post.  Some good discussions of late.  Am hoping that the rumor of something coming out is true...although we have heard that many times.  It is like the "case will be solved in 24 hours/48 hours.  I hope that the DeVries show is turning up the heat on some of those involved, or at least looking at the case without the need to protect anyone.  

Hope all is well with all the Monkeys.  Am off to catch up on my FP reading now.


Yes the De Vries show will be interesting one way or the other.

Don't really know how much he can come up with within the confines of a show's investigation and the amount of time he and his folks will be putting into it.

Sure do hope it's something real and positive from our point of view.


I've been a little worried about the above. It seems like there's not enough time for them to delve very deep if the show is going to air at the end of November.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:10:22 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


I thought the rumors were that he is Lorenzo's biological father?  is that just rumor?


That was a very STRONG rumor from Arubagirls mother.  She is the one who told AG that was the rumor.  AG told us.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: robots on November 13, 2006, 11:11:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!


I don't get it either.....

I think the MYTH was bigger than the PERSON

Who I saw was a healthy, attractive young guy.
Not the "MYSTERIOUS LORENZO"

I think there ARE parties & POSSIBLY he has "BLACKMAIL" on certain people that frequent his parties.

His late father was "best friends" with Paulus
Paul van Rijn killed himself....
Demons plagued him, as well as drugs.


He was one of the first people afther JK2 and the Security Guards that was brought in for questioning.  There is a reason for that.  Either he is involved in some way or he knows something.  I don't give a crap how wholesome looking he is.


yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:11:47 PM
The lanterns on Lorenzo van Rijn's property......(on left)

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Jaraweg2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:11:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Seems odd to me that Lorenzo seems to have this need for a van.....with a windowless back?....seems like a work vehicle. What does he need to transport  without anyone seeing? I would think that he would likely drive a convertible 2 seater something....but that's just me.


DRUGS.


DITTO

Florida...TY for the photos ....

hey monkeys..tryin to catch up


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:12:08 PM
I'm with you Klaas. You go girl.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:12:19 PM
Quite honestly because Lorenzo is attractive makes far more sense if he's the ultimate snake oil salesmen, for someone working with Art Woods confirmed speaking with several of the young girls taken to those parties and one speaking of being shown these porn films like they were recruiting tapes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:13:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


I thought the rumors were that he is Lorenzo's biological father?  is that just rumor?


That was a very STRONG rumor from Arubagirls mother.  She is the one who told AG that was the rumor.  AG told us.


yup, I remember it well....before the mis-information began.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:14:28 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


I thought the rumors were that he is Lorenzo's biological father?  is that just rumor?


POSSIBLY....Lorenzo looks alot like Paulus!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:15:14 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
The lanterns on Lorenzo van Rijn's property......(on left)

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Jaraweg2.jpg)



and barbed wire?  or am i seeing things?

Florida u musta been busy!
I thought pvds was biological father too....also always felt some evidence was at Lorenzoes...where is this house Florida?  Is there one also on the way to Saveneta..main road...spray painted? The one w/ the basement... TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:16:45 PM
Quote from: friend of monkeys


Florida...TY for the photos ....

Ahhhh....Thanks, waiting for someone to say "Thanks"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:18:18 PM
Florida wrote;
Quote


POSSIBLY....Lorenzo looks alot like Paulus!


Even though the photo of the driver in the earthquake van is dark, the shape of the head strongly resembles paulus IMO. Talk from early on had Lorenzo as JVDS half brother. It was said that they are  very close.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:18:31 PM
Sorry, this will blow the margins.  Here is AG's original post with some comments:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/aglorenzorumor-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:19:28 PM
I want to thank you also Florida The pics are great.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:20:05 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Florida"
The lanterns on Lorenzo van Rijn's property......(on left)

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Jaraweg2.jpg)



and barbed wire?  or am i seeing things?

Florida u musta been busy!
I thought pvds was biological father too....also always felt some evidence was at Lorenzoes...where is this house Florida?  Is there one also on the way to Saveneta..main road...spray painted? The one w/ the basement... TY


The PSYCHEDIC PAINTED Home was probably his van from years ago.
Yes, I believe there is a BASEMENT at the Jaraweg home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 11:21:12 PM
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:21:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


I thought the rumors were that he is Lorenzo's biological father?  is that just rumor?


That was a very STRONG rumor from Arubagirls mother.  She is the one who told AG that was the rumor.  AG told us.


That's right! I forgot ag was the one who told us.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:21:57 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 11:22:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
It was said that Paulus was tracked to Astrid van Rijn's
house in June 2005.....

Is he a friend or ......................?


I thought the rumors were that he is Lorenzo's biological father?  is that just rumor?


That was a very STRONG rumor from Arubagirls mother.  She is the one who told AG that was the rumor.  AG told us.


I remember this, Klaasend, and with all due respect to AG & her mother, I would think there are many more on Aruba that know this rumor, if it does have any fraction of truth to it.  I always thought the younger man driving the wildly painted van resembled PVDS...if that amounts to a hill of beans.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:22:23 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I want to thank you also Florida The pics are great.


It was quite SCARY taking the photos.....

Thanks, BleachedBlack...I respect your posts!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 11:22:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Sorry, I think the misinformation campaign began early on 05/31/05.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:24:01 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Sorry, I think the misinformation campaign began early on 05/31/05.

I agree, I just don't think AG was part of it. I could be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 13, 2006, 11:25:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Sorry, I think the misinformation campaign began early on 05/31/05.

I agree, I just don't think AG was part of it. I could be wrong.


Maybe unwittingly?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:25:23 PM
UMA — sorry, but things shut down for me yesterday. I think you’re right — the discussion here tends toward the incestuous, and I dislike the fact that no one chose to answer your very relevant question. Lorenzo van Rjin is a character with a shady presence behind the entire NH matter. Usually referred to as “Crazy Lorenzo,” he is said to have lost it after his “father” committed suicide. His craziness, however, is more likely complete irresponsibility and self-indulgence, rather than actual insanity. He is said to own at least two houses on Aruba, one of which may be the “house in the country” which some folks on here think NH was dispatched to. He is a young man, and some talk has his as the illegitimate sone of PVDS, i.e. the half-brother of JVDS. The authorities interviewed him a while ago. Evidently, he has an alibi for th enight NH went missing.

Comment by dude-aah | June 29, 2005, 9:00 pm

characters:

    http://tinyurl.com/y9jjlb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:25:33 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Sorry, I think the misinformation campaign began early on 05/31/05.

I agree, I just don't think AG was part of it. I could be wrong.


Maybe unwittingly?

Yes, that is very possible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:27:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Sorry, I think the misinformation campaign began early on 05/31/05.

I agree, I just don't think AG was part of it. I could be wrong.


Maybe mis-information is harsh, but she and others definately started IMO to try and undo, retract things that were said early on for whatever reasons.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:28:09 PM
Florida-

I didn't realize the photos came from you, so thank you again !

Klaas-

Is it common knowledge who AG's parents lived next door to yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:28:42 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
And AG's post was not part of the mis information campaign?

I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign, or at least not in the beginning.


Sorry, I think the misinformation campaign began early on 05/31/05.

I agree, I just don't think AG was part of it. I could be wrong.


Maybe mis-information is harsh, but she and others definately started IMO to try and undo, retract things that were said early on for whatever reasons.

Yes, and I know there are many things Arubagirl and Nativelingo said in the beginning they wish they could retract.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:28:48 PM
Could it be that there is actually an inherited trait that makes the male Sloots kinda loco?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:29:38 PM
Wasn't JAIME C. Lorenzo's alibi for that night?

They were partying?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 13, 2006, 11:30:20 PM
Red spent time with AG & I thought met some of her family when there....not sure we ever asked who lived next door to them, None....lots of questions asked, but many still coming up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:30:33 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Florida-

I didn't realize the photos came from you, so thank you again !

Klaas-

Is it common knowledge who AG's parents lived next door to yet?


OK, out with it!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:31:00 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I want to thank you also Florida The pics are great.


It was quite SCARY taking the photos.....

Thanks, BleachedBlack...I respect your posts!



I shoulda said THANKS"...lol..not just "TY"   Florida!!

AND  Klass...nice work bringing up the AG post.
This was where that whole thing started...and i do not believe AG was part of a misinformation campaign either...not in the beginning...but then..i think things got too close to hom,e for her somehow...she was tied in w/ the ArubaDage Radio DJ i am pretty sure...he was on the site lurking himself often...in the beginning


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:31:16 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Wasn't JAIME C. Lorenzo's alibi for that night?

They were partying?

I thought it was Max Arends, who left for Florida right afterwards.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:31:17 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Wasn't JAIME C. Lorenzo's alibi for that night?

They were partying?


I think as I recall Max Arenz was Lorenzo's alibi....the reace car driver guy same age as LVR


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:31:49 PM
sorry should be race car driver  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:31:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, and I know there are many things Arubagirl and Nativelingo said in the beginning they wish they could retract.


IMO..........ArubaGirl=Simian
Aruba Girl has relatives in ALE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:33:23 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Wasn't JAIME C. Lorenzo's alibi for that night?

They were partying?


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:33:37 PM
Hey Klaas, my first impression from the photo was that "Lorenzo" looked clean-cut and not so notorious. I'm not saying he's not heavily involved or into some bad stuff. I was just surprised to see him look like that, and not that I can see him all that well in the photo, either.

Thank you for posting it. Can you say who asked you not to post it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:34:01 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, and I know there are many things Arubagirl and Nativelingo said in the beginning they wish they could retract.


IMO..........ArubaGirl=Simian
Aruba Girl has relatives in ALE

I really don't believe AG is Siman.  Yes, AG does have relative in ALE but probably everyone on the island does, lol  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:34:56 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, and I know there are many things Arubagirl and Nativelingo said in the beginning they wish they could retract.


IMO..........ArubaGirl=Simian
Aruba Girl has relatives in ALE


I soooo agree with this.
I did a comparison (timeline) of all of AG's posts and Simian's posts. The information was very compelling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:35:15 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Hey Klaas, my first impression from the photo was that "Lorenzo" looked clean-cut and not so notorious. I'm not saying he's not heavily involved or into some bad stuff. I was just surprised to see him look like that, and not that I can see him all that well in the photo, either.

Thank you for posting it. Can you say who asked you not to post it?

I honestly don't remember who it was that asked me not to post it.  All I can tell you is that I've had that photo for over a year.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:36:42 PM
I respectedly disagree......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:36:43 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
sorry should be race car driver  :cry:


and maxs' brother used to post here.....and there was a search at some point of his race shop wasn't there...

i think all these people were at Lorenzoes party.
And Steve Croes thought he would be "the man"  and confirm the alibi to get all his buddies in the clear...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:38:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Wasn't JAIME C. Lorenzo's alibi for that night?

They were partying?

I thought it was Max Arends, who left for Florida right afterwards.


There was Max Arends, Jorans friend and neighbor, nick name Ibi who left to attend Valencia community college in fl. He was jorans age.

Then there was Max Ahrenz the race car driver ( I am not sure the spellings are correct but I know they are each different) he was I think 26 at the time? He was reportedly Lorenzo's alibi for the night. He was reportedly at a party that night at Lorenzo's and that they were there for the night. How this was deemed an "air-tight " alibi I have no idea, but those were the words reported at the time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 11:38:25 PM
I remember when Lorenzo had a tickle site. He looked like a nice looking man age 25 or so with dark blonde hair.  Lots of girls as friends.
Then, there was some of Lorenzo with a friend who used to work on the cruise ships. There was a pix of them on the beach in Aruba. Another pix of them in a house, small hallway, drinking beer.
And yet another picture with a grey mask looking like a rasta diving helmet.
But why this obsession with him ?
And Hiram .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:38:35 PM
FOB, do you think Natalee was at the party?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:38:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, and I know there are many things Arubagirl and Nativelingo said in the beginning they wish they could retract.


IMO..........ArubaGirl=Simian
Aruba Girl has relatives in ALE

I really don't believe AG is Siman.  Yes, AG does have relative in ALE but probably everyone on the island does, lol  :wink:


ArubaGirl quotes SIMIAN as FACT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:39:29 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
I respectedly disagree......


and I respectfully agree....with you!    :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:40:42 PM
I think AG was trying to help .
Thats just me.

I do think the people it / the case...the list of suspect...caused her some difficulty as it was known by arubans from her outspoken nature here......make sense?  sorry...getting late...going soon

Lorenzo does have a crazy house on main road to savaneta tho too
I always thought this was the party pad


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:42:32 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Florida-

I didn't realize the photos came from you, so thank you again !

Klaas-

Is it common knowledge who AG's parents lived next door to yet?


OK, out with it!  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol: well I was opening the door for Klaas to out with it  :lol:

didn't work - shoot.......I'll keep the secret then  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:42:40 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
FOB, do you think Natalee was at the party?


Me?   YES...and never left...she was too fuc%ed up to bring her to the hotel


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:44:04 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Florida-

I didn't realize the photos came from you, so thank you again !

Klaas-

Is it common knowledge who AG's parents lived next door to yet?


OK, out with it!  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol: well I was opening the door for Klaas to out with it  :lol:

didn't work - shoot.......I'll keep the secret then  :lol:


Darn it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:45:41 PM
Quote from: bleachedblack
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Wasn't JAIME C. Lorenzo's alibi for that night?

They were partying?

I thought it was Max Arends, who left for Florida right afterwards.


There was Max Arends, Jorans friend and neighbor, nick name Ibi who left to attend Valencia community college in fl. He was jorans age.

Then there was Max Ahrenz the race car driver ( I am not sure the spellings are correct but I know they are each different) he was I think 26 at the time? He was reportedly Lorenzo's alibi for the night. He was reportedly at a party that night at Lorenzo's and that they were there for the night. How this was deemed an "air-tight " alibi I have no idea, but those were the words reported at the time.[/quote]

Wasn't this reported by Simian? Lala's? You here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:45:47 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Florida-

I didn't realize the photos came from you, so thank you again !

Klaas-

Is it common knowledge who AG's parents lived next door to yet?


OK, out with it!  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol: well I was opening the door for Klaas to out with it  :lol:

didn't work - shoot.......I'll keep the secret then  :lol:


i am gonna guess....lorenzos family/  or vds?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:47:26 PM
Just found this:
Van Rijn Lorenzo and Max Arendzs were detained and questioned on Friday

Didn't they realize it was the "other Max Arends"?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 13, 2006, 11:47:29 PM
Please do not discuss secrets in front of me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:47:59 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I remember when Lorenzo had a tickle site. He looked like a nice looking man age 25 or so with dark blonde hair.  Lots of girls as friends.
Then, there was some of Lorenzo with a friend who used to work on the cruise ships. There was a pix of them on the beach in Aruba. Another pix of them in a house, small hallway, drinking beer.
And yet another picture with a grey mask looking like a rasta diving helmet.
But why this obsession with him ?
And Hiram .

1.  The Lorenzo with the tickle site didn't even list a country.  I don't know why people thought it was Lorenzo.

2.  There was a picture of someone on the beach that someone thought was Lorenzo.  Don't know why.

3.  The guy in the house drinking a beer never was Lorenzo, his name is urine or something like that.  I believe he just happens to be another Dutch guy.

4.  The other guy with the grey mask is a member of the band Slip Knot (I think that's the name of the band).  Not Lorenzo.

The facination is that it was reported by many locals in Aruba that he was crazy and held rave parties.  He was brought in for questioning.  Then all went quiet about Lorenzo and we were told he was not involved.

I think he is or he knows what happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:48:29 PM
Neither FOM but sigh......I tried  :lol:

moving right along.......  :lol: FOM did you ever see any of AG's posts at RU? She made quite a 360 once she was there a few weeks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Florida on November 13, 2006, 11:48:31 PM
Please do not discuss secrets in front of me.

What does this mean?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 11:48:32 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Florida-

I didn't realize the photos came from you, so thank you again !

Klaas-

Is it common knowledge who AG's parents lived next door to yet?


OK, out with it!  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol: well I was opening the door for Klaas to out with it  :lol:

didn't work - shoot.......I'll keep the secret then  :lol:


OH NO YOU DON'T !!!  Someone better tell and right now....it's time....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:49:12 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Just found this:
Van Rijn Lorenzo and Max Arendzs were detained and questioned on Friday

Didn't they realize it was the "other Max Arends"?????


What do you mean the other Max Arends? sorry I have a thick monkey skull


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:49:22 PM
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.

Unless maybe it was the Van Der Straatens??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:49:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:50:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I remember when Lorenzo had a tickle site. He looked like a nice looking man age 25 or so with dark blonde hair.  Lots of girls as friends.
Then, there was some of Lorenzo with a friend who used to work on the cruise ships. There was a pix of them on the beach in Aruba. Another pix of them in a house, small hallway, drinking beer.
And yet another picture with a grey mask looking like a rasta diving helmet.
But why this obsession with him ?
And Hiram .

1.  The Lorenzo with the tickle site didn't even list a country.  I don't know why people thought it was Lorenzo.

2.  There was a picture of someone on the beach that someone thought was Lorenzo.  Don't know why.

3.  The guy in the house drinking a beer never was Lorenzo, his name is urine or something like that.  I believe he just happens to be another Dutch guy.

4.  The other guy with the grey mask is a member of the band Slip Knot (I think that's the name of the band).  Not Lorenzo.

The facination is that it was reported by many locals in Aruba that he was crazy and held rave parties.  He was brought in for questioning.  Then all went quiet about Lorenzo and we were told he was not involved.

I think he is or he knows what happened.


Very well said Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:50:36 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Neither FOM but sigh......I tried  :lol:

moving right along.......  :lol: FOM did you ever see any of AG's posts at RU? She made quite a 360 once she was there a few weeks.


never went there None...heard it was so bad

but her post is ...compelling...from june 18.....i think she was telling what she and others..on the local level..knew..about that nite...just me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:50:42 PM
Quote


OH NO YOU DON'T !!! Someone better tell and right now....it's time....

 WTF?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:50:44 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


oh shoot I didn't see you had that beneath your call-out to me YES the Stratten's

last thing I want to do is to confuse anyone - WHEW !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:50:54 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


Yes, I just remembered.  AG was very clear about the Van Der Straatens and her family being very close.  I know she did everthing she could to protect Van Der Straaten.  She said she would trust him with her life, or something like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:52:03 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:52:24 PM
I CAN BREATHE AGAIN  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 13, 2006, 11:53:01 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I CAN BREATHE AGAIN  :lol:  :lol:


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 13, 2006, 11:53:14 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


Thank you, thank you.  :roll:

I have held my breath long enough....finally!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:53:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


Yes, I just remembered.  AG was very clear about the Van Der Straatens and her family being very close.  I know she did everthing she could to protect Van Der Straaten.  She said she would trust him with her life, or something like that.


Well that certainly puts a different light on things.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 13, 2006, 11:55:37 PM
Wow!

So, was ag helping at first until she realized that van der Stratten was involved in the coverup?
I'm trying to process this new bit of information.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:56:36 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


Yes, I just remembered.  AG was very clear about the Van Der Straatens and her family being very close.  I know she did everthing she could to protect Van Der Straaten.  She said she would trust him with her life, or something like that.


Well that certainly puts a different light on things.  :shock:



Yes.......would be good if you were in his "family"....poor you if not....u know?

no body ..no crime.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 13, 2006, 11:56:38 PM
I think it does Memphis and I also like Klaas, wonder if AG realized the ramifications or even the complexities of what she was being swept up into in the beginning. She is pretty young and she also seems quite blindly loyal to her homeland. She also posts on her own blog with a fair measure of aristocratic airs  :wink:

I do however think Stratten could have led her where he wanted her to go, or certainly greatly influenced her in ways that were not always so obvious to one so young........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 13, 2006, 11:58:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche - please tell us because I don't remember who AG's family lived next door to.


Van Der Stratten????


Thank you, thank you.  :roll:

I have held my breath long enough....finally!!




K.....everybody breathe now!

I am gonna go to bed...glad i was present for these revelations...
monkeys you rock....

be good


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:58:28 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Wow!

So, was ag helping at first until she realized that van der Stratten was involved in the coverup?
I'm trying to process this new bit of information.


She was certainly helping in the begining, I didn't know what changed things. Did you ever read the MAJORWAGER site posts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 13, 2006, 11:59:18 PM
Nite FOM .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:00:36 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I think it does Memphis and I also like Klaas, wonder if AG realized the ramifications or even the complexities of what she was being swept up into in the beginning. She is pretty young and she also seems quite blindly loyal to her homeland. She also posts on her own blog with a fair measure of aristocratic airs  :wink:

I do however think Stratten could have led her where he wanted her to go, or certainly greatly influenced her in ways that were not always so obvious to one so young........


I agree that she didn't really know how big things were at first. I also feel that she got scared (maybe).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 14, 2006, 12:01:32 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I think it does Memphis and I also like Klaas, wonder if AG realized the ramifications or even the complexities of what she was being swept up into in the beginning. She is pretty young and she also seems quite blindly loyal to her homeland. She also posts on her own blog with a fair measure of aristocratic airs  :wink:

I do however think Stratten could have led her where he wanted her to go, or certainly greatly influenced her in ways that were not always so obvious to one so young........


yes...but she would not have made that post i think if at the time she knew how closely involved vanderstratten was...in Nats disappearance..when it became an obvious ALE cover up.....how could she get out of what she had posted in seemingly honest effort to provide local info?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:01:50 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "memphis"
Wow!

So, was ag helping at first until she realized that van der Stratten was involved in the coverup?
I'm trying to process this new bit of information.


She was certainly helping in the begining, I didn't know what changed things. Did you ever read the MAJORWAGER site posts?


Yes I did read some of them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:04:44 AM
Another post about the different Max's which I think seems correct.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++



lorenzo is old news. there are two max, ahrendz and arends, one joran's age and nephew of jossy and one older, more like lorenzo's age. lorenzo may have ben questioned early on and his house searched with negative results. noboy who has looked carefully at this thinks lorenzo is involved. max the younger is jorans school friend who was questioned as a witness. paulus then asked lorenzo what the cops asked him and relayed the info to joran. that is why he got into trouble.

Posted by: iquitos | Saturday, November 19, 2005 at 08:14 PM

Anna,

Max Ahrends and Max (Maxito) Arentz are two different people. Max Ahrends is maybe 18, Maxito is older. Maxito supplied the alibi for Lorenzo Van Rijn.

It's unfortunate that the two names are so similar. Causes a lot of confusion.

Posted by: sensible | Aug 26, 2005 3:23:17 PM

Posted by: iquitos | Saturday, November 19, 2005 at 08:16 PM

http://tinyurl.com/uvv9b


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:05:03 AM
Nite FOM.

Thank you so much for the pictures Florida. I did not know you were in Aruba. Those were great.

Thank you Klaas for posting the picture of Lorenzo.

Thank you None for telling us AG's neighbor.

Good information, and yes, it has been long enough and it is time to spill it all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:05:24 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "memphis"
Wow!

So, was ag helping at first until she realized that van der Stratten was involved in the coverup?
I'm trying to process this new bit of information.


She was certainly helping in the begining, I didn't know what changed things. Did you ever read the MAJORWAGER site posts?


Yes I did read some of them.


clevfan=AG


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:06:02 AM
FOM-

When we have adults far older than she unwilling to tell the truth, I think we could not expect AG to tell anything she discovered over time either. Seems the lay of the land in Aruba, to keep secrets.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:07:56 AM
OT

Nonesuche, I added to my vocabulary tonight and thought I would use what I learned in a sentence.

There is a poster with a certain propensity for sparkling accessories, but that poster is BHNC.

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:09:23 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
OT

Nonesuche, I added to my vocabulary tonight and thought I would use what I learned in a sentence.

There is a poster with a certain propensity for sparkling accessories, but that poster is BHNC.

 :lol:


high-five Memphis, you learn well and quickly  :lol:  :lol:

where did Lala's go? I want to hear her thoughts on these revelations now that she can breathe again too !  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:09:35 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "memphis"
Wow!

So, was ag helping at first until she realized that van der Stratten was involved in the coverup?
I'm trying to process this new bit of information.


She was certainly helping in the begining, I didn't know what changed things. Did you ever read the MAJORWAGER site posts?


Yes I did read some of them.


clevfan=AG


Right. I remember. Not sure I remember the specific posts, but I've read them. Are they archived anywhere?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:10:29 AM
Well, since everyone brought up the Simian thing again...here goes..

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:03 pm
The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left?


Who gives the parties?  Lorenzo.  Why did ALE question him early on?  Because he gives the parties.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:11:29 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
OT

Nonesuche, I added to my vocabulary tonight and thought I would use what I learned in a sentence.

There is a poster with a certain propensity for sparkling accessories, but that poster is BHNC.

 :lol:


high-five Memphis, you learn well and quickly  :lol:  :lol:

where did Lala's go? I want to hear her thoughts on these revelations now that she can breathe again too !  :lol:


These revelations are not new to me...I just don't keep secrets very well..or maybe I do. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:11:30 AM
None  :lol:

Lala's? oh Lala's? Where are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 14, 2006, 12:11:35 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
OT

Nonesuche, I added to my vocabulary tonight and thought I would use what I learned in a sentence.

There is a poster with a certain propensity for sparkling accessories, but that poster is BHNC.

 :lol:



 :lol: ROFLMAO  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:12:10 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
None  :lol:

Lala's? oh Lala's? Where are you?


What Memphis dear?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 14, 2006, 12:13:17 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
FOM-

When we have adults far older than she unwilling to tell the truth, I think we could not expect AG to tell anything she discovered over time either. Seems the lay of the land in Aruba, to keep secrets.



i know None...and ty to all those who wished me good nite..lol...soon

just the way she posteed that....it is like too crazy not to be true ....just a feeling of mine..i don't want to be flamed...i at least believe SHE believed what she was saying.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:14:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "memphis"
None  :lol:

Lala's? oh Lala's? Where are you?


What Memphis dear?


There you are. I see you were looking up Simian stuff.

Ok, what other secrets need to be spilled?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:15:17 AM
Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:06 am
The important “others” are the ones that supported the alibi.

Now, who are these "others"?  The people at the party.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:16:01 AM
Bleached, do you have an opinion on Simian, ClevFan or AG?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:16:12 AM
ahhhh, Lala's is tangoing........where is carnut?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:18:38 AM
Okay, Klaas or someone.  Give me van der Straatens address.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:18:53 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:06 am
The important “others” are the ones that supported the alibi.

Now, who are these "others"?  The people at the party.


Wonder what constitutes "important others"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:19:40 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Okay, Klaas or someone.  Give me van der Straatens address.

I don't have it yet, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:21:31 AM
Shower time, be back in a bit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:21:33 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Bleached, do you have an opinion on Simian, ClevFan or AG?


I agree with much that has been said. I think AG was concerned and only sought to help in the begining, but  then clearly had a change in her thinking about the case late summer 2005? I guess now I understand better why.  She is an avid blogger and I like very much to read what she writes. I have always liked her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:21:36 AM
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:22:20 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 12:23:06 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign.
Clearly not anything subversive about her last summer. When the archives from last June/July become available i think it will become obvious to those with doubts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:23:41 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:06 am
The important “others” are the ones that supported the alibi.

Now, who are these "others"?  The people at the party.


Max A. supported the alibi, but Simian says "others" (plural). What are you saying? Everyone at the party?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:27:32 AM
I don't remember Peeps.

Tell us.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:27:36 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign.
Clearly not anything subversive about her last summer. When the archives from last June/July become available i think it will become obvious to those with doubts.


do you think we're picking on AG?  :lol: we're just trying to solve the puzzle, take that blindfold off your eyes igsigs  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 14, 2006, 12:31:53 AM
Hi guys! I'm lurking and reading, but wanted to say hello! Waving!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:32:21 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Very interesting. Anything else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:33:24 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi guys! I'm lurking and reading, but wanted to say hello! Waving!


Hi CBB!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:33:30 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Very interesting. Anything else?


Not much, I think he posted under various names.... Lala's what else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:34:12 AM
Hey CBB-

How are you? Come join the party !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:34:15 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi guys! I'm lurking and reading, but wanted to say hello! Waving!


Hi CBB!


It's good to see you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:34:37 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Peeps was the webmaster for the Aruba Speed Shop website, run by Max Arendz, friend of Lorenzo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:34:48 AM
Hi CBB.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 14, 2006, 12:35:19 AM
Hey, Memphis, good to see you too! I don't remember Peeps.........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:35:48 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Peeps was the webmaster for the Aruba Speed Shop website, run by Max Arendz, friend of Lorenzo.


I remember him vaguely but could not quote you anything of value of his posts, so what do you feel is key here? Inquiring minds want to know Lala :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:36:16 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Peeps was the webmaster for the Aruba Speed Shop website, run by Max Arendz, friend of Lorenzo.


So do you think Peeps was Max? He was very protective and secretive in his answers as I recall.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 14, 2006, 12:37:30 AM
Hi Bleached black! Yeah, Lala's, you're always right on top of things, wazzup with Peeps?

Hi none! Great to see you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:38:01 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Peeps was the webmaster for the Aruba Speed Shop website, run by Max Arendz, friend of Lorenzo.


Whoa!

Amazing who was on talking in the early days, isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:41:18 AM
I also remember an interesting poster named Tony.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:42:02 AM
Max Arendz owns the Speed Shop and Peeps was his best friend.  He did all the website stuff for him.  I remember on another forum when asked if they knew Lorenzo and they denied it.  So if true, why did Max provide the alibi for Lorenzo?  How do you go to a party and not know the host?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:42:11 AM
So, did Peeps post in the forum or FP?
I'm guessing the forum, which we don't have access to.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:42:47 AM
CBB
Do you remember Peeps?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 12:43:18 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Another post about the different Max's which I think seems correct.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++



lorenzo is old news. there are two max, ahrendz and arends, one joran's age and nephew of jossy and one older, more like lorenzo's age. lorenzo may have ben questioned early on and his house searched with negative results. nobody who has looked carefully at this thinks lorenzo is involved. max the younger is jorans school friend who was questioned as a witness. paulus then asked lorenzo what the cops asked him and relayed the info to joran. that is why he got into trouble.

Posted by: iquitos | Saturday, November 19, 2005 at 08:14 PM

Anna,

Max Ahrends and Max (Maxito) Arentz are two different people. Max Ahrends is maybe 18, Maxito is older. Maxito supplied the alibi for Lorenzo Van Rijn.

It's unfortunate that the two names are so similar. Causes a lot of confusion.

Posted by: sensible | Aug 26, 2005 3:23:17 PM

Posted by: iquitos | Saturday, November 19, 2005 at 08:16 PM

http://tinyurl.com/uvv9b



OK, I'm just lurking as this thread is rather hard to follow but now my name has come up so can't be still for that without responding.

AG was very defensive about the vdStraatens but if you will recall, she routinely decked me for mentioning Gilliam and told me there was no one on the island by that name.  And monkeys generally sided with her that I was appalling to ask such a thing.   :wink: Same with Bon Dia, lol, but that's another story.  Back to Gilliam.

Right, he is on Curacao but I do believe he may be related to the police Chief van der Straaten.  AG said his children were much older but how old would Uncle Jan have to be for this to be true?  He and Paulus are believed to have been cronies in the NL from years ago so I tend to think they are also the same age.  And while AG and her family seem very close to the van der Straatens, I have never been convinced Mrs. Straaten and the kids ever lived in Aruba.  Couldn't really find out as the topic was considered upsetting AG and I was mean to be doing such.  :wink:

The younger Max Ahrends who went to Florida I do believe to be related to Jossy, just as an aside.  His sister's son or grandson?  Not important but don't think he was involved, questioned or anything.

I remember we asked AG to go look in the windows of her neighbors and see if she could see the Sloots and at the time the Sloots were staying with the Vockings, not the van der Straatens so I wonder which was her neighbor?  Were Jan's children really that old?  Did she know of Gilliam and that is why instead of saying there was no such person she said there was no one by that name on the island?  And we originally had Koen pegged as Gilliam.  There is an old website that shows this still around.

Seems Gilliam and younger brother live in Curacao.  At least they are on swim team there.  Where is the mother?  Are they divorced or what?  Yes, she had the utmost regard for vdStraaten.

I wish Sensible still posted and I could find her again.   :(

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:45:41 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Max Arendz owns the Speed Shop and Peeps was his best friend.  He did all the website stuff for him.  I remember on another forum when asked if they knew Lorenzo and they denied it.  So if true, why did Max provide the alibi for Lorenzo?  How do you go to a party and not know the host?


Very true....I remember it being said that Maxito  was friends with LVR, they obviously knew each other. It was the last night of SoulBeach with no scheduled afterhours party. I always wondered if the party was not at Lorenzo's for some of the band members?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:45:43 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Do any of you guys remember the poster Peeps?


I remember Peeps. He was a friend of Lorenzo as I recall he posted the eathquake van pic first.


Peeps was the webmaster for the Aruba Speed Shop website, run by Max Arendz, friend of Lorenzo.


From this website.  The same website coincidentally we found the photo of officer Shaniro Baldrik KELLY.

http://www.boostunit.com/home.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:45:55 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
So, did Peeps post in the forum or FP?
I'm guessing the forum, which we don't have access to.  :(



Most likely under other names. I bet Klaas would know. See when the name Max Arendz came up as being an alibi to the infamous Lorenzo, we didn't know he was important then, the Speed Shop website kept getting all these hits from Scared Monkeys and they got curious.  The person to ask would be our own poster, Eleye.  I think he would remember this conversation from Theory and Spec. days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:46:49 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
So, did Peeps post in the forum or FP?
I'm guessing the forum, which we don't have access to.  :(

Peeps posted in the Code Talkers thread after some posters at SM went into their forum asking questions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:48:26 AM
Well, I know AG street address, but will not make it public here, even though it is already public knowledge.  That is why I wanted Straaten's address.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:49:16 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
So, did Peeps post in the forum or FP?
I'm guessing the forum, which we don't have access to.  :(

Peeps posted in the Code Talkers thread after some posters at SM went into their forum asking questions.


See, sometimes I do know the East from the West.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:50:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, I know AG street address, but will not make it public here, even though it is already public knowledge.  That is why I wanted Straaten's address.


Straten Jan Van Der, Paraguana 6


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 12:51:06 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign.
Clearly not anything subversive about her last summer. When the archives from last June/July become available i think it will become obvious to those with doubts.


do you think we're picking on AG?  :lol: we're just trying to solve the puzzle, take that blindfold off your eyes igsigs  :lol:


Troublemaker   :arrow:    8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:51:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
So, did Peeps post in the forum or FP?
I'm guessing the forum, which we don't have access to.  :(

Peeps posted in the Code Talkers thread after some posters at SM went into their forum asking questions.


See, sometimes I do know the East from the West.  :wink:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 14, 2006, 12:52:36 AM
Sorry Lala's, I don't remember him. If he was primarily on the code talkers thread, I wouldn't have run into him. Interesting stuff...........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 12:54:11 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't think AG was part of any misinformation campaign.
Clearly not anything subversive about her last summer. When the archives from last June/July become available i think it will become obvious to those with doubts.


do you think we're picking on AG?  :lol: we're just trying to solve the puzzle, take that blindfold off your eyes igsigs  :lol:


Troublemaker   :arrow:    8)


no I don't wear the crown jewels so I don't qualify  :lol:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:54:31 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, I know AG street address, but will not make it public here, even though it is already public knowledge.  That is why I wanted Straaten's address.


You saved it? I'm impressed. You are a modest monkey, but very smart.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 12:55:36 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I also remember an interesting poster named Tony.


Tell us more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:55:56 AM
Okay, let's talk "5th suspect" here for a bit...these are not my thoughts but come from a very astute former poster here...

no one wants to talk about Lorenzo, who is simian's 5th suspect

simian on June 22:
I am here. Can't say the things I want…
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.
The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.
The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left?"

How many suspects were there on June 22?

June 9 Joran/K2 detained = 3
June 13 security guards released
June 16 Lorenzo questioned (considered a suspect according to Tito Lacle/FOXNews/Aruba Today)
June 17 Maxito Arendsz questioned, provided alibi for Lorenzo
June 17 Steve Croes detained = 1
June 18 Paulus questioned
June 19 Paulus questioned
________________________ total suspects = 4 ... or 5 ... counting Lorenzo
June 23 Paulus detained

Paulus is not on the list of suspects on June 22 when simian says:

The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.
The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.
The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 12:56:14 AM
Here is another interesting post :

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:52 am    Post subject:      Reply with quote
Lorenzo had 3 houses:
his mansion Savaneta 172, Savaneta (Jaraweg),
his concrete country block house, near Arikok Park near Hooiberg,
and the mansion his mother lived in, which is the ONLY ONE they searched, apx June 16th?:
SAVANETA 123-K, SAVANETA, ARUBA

Lorenzo also had an alibi for why he could not have been out with Natalee:
Max Arendz (the race car driver and his friend) said Lorenzo was hosting a (basically all night) party at his mansion which Max attended, which gave Lorenzo his air tight alibi.

IF the party that Paulus and the elders attended was at Lorenzo's house, and Natalee was delivered there, Lorenzo no longer has an air tight alibi does he.

In Lively Case Discussion # 495
Two people (a recall of what DutchLady had said in the past, and Sandy Leiva, our Aruban language translator) both who should know the Dutch better than we do told of a GENERATIONAL tradition type thing. The old (the "elders") have the young deliver young pretty girls to them for their pleasure. Then as the young grow old, they teach their young, and it repeats, making it generational.

NOW
Combine ALL of it:
the GENERATIONAL INFO
the DATE-RAPE DRUGS
the PORN filming

WHAT SICK TWISTED BUT PROBABLY TRUE FINAL RESULT DO WE HAVE?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:56:24 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, I know AG street address, but will not make it public here, even though it is already public knowledge.  That is why I wanted Straaten's address.


Straten Jan Van Der, Paraguana 6


Lala's the above is in the Aruba white pages.  I have no idea if it's current or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:57:22 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, I know AG street address, but will not make it public here, even though it is already public knowledge.  That is why I wanted Straaten's address.


Straten Jan Van Der, Paraguana 6


Now I need a map with street names.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 12:58:06 AM
.
Some of the old codetalkers still have the Peeps posts.  One sent to me not that long ago, few months.  Now sure if I kept it or what I might have filed it under but I guess I am the only one who doesn't think the party at LVR involved.

Not sure exactly why but don't think he is the major player in this that many do.  I think he was called in for questioning as the local resident strange person pretty much but don't make much further connection.

I always thought AG posting at MajorWager might be a gambling connection, too.   8)

But we were told LVR uses a different last name in The Netherlands.  Don't know if that part is true or not for we never know what is true and what isn't.  Do we even know he was called in for questioning for a fact?  Remember when we tried to ask that irrefutable source TITO, he gave us the fictional character Lorenzo Wever.

Since that was finally cleared up, I have wondered if it was really Guido Wever called in early or Lorenzo.  Too much double talk out of Aruba.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 12:58:40 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, I know AG street address, but will not make it public here, even though it is already public knowledge.  That is why I wanted Straaten's address.


Straten Jan Van Der, Paraguana 6


Now I need a map with street names.  :wink:

Ha, good luck with that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 12:59:19 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Here is another interesting post :

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:52 am    Post subject:      Reply with quote
Lorenzo had 3 houses:
his mansion Savaneta 172, Savaneta (Jaraweg),
his concrete country block house, near Arikok Park near Hooiberg,
and the mansion his mother lived in, which is the ONLY ONE they searched, apx June 16th?:
SAVANETA 123-K, SAVANETA, ARUBA

Lorenzo also had an alibi for why he could not have been out with Natalee:
Max Arendz (the race car driver and his friend) said Lorenzo was hosting a (basically all night) party at his mansion which Max attended, which gave Lorenzo his air tight alibi.

IF the party that Paulus and the elders attended was at Lorenzo's house, and Natalee was delivered there, Lorenzo no longer has an air tight alibi does he.

In Lively Case Discussion # 495
Two people (a recall of what DutchLady had said in the past, and Sandy Leiva, our Aruban language translator) both who should know the Dutch better than we do told of a GENERATIONAL tradition type thing. The old (the "elders") have the young deliver young pretty girls to them for their pleasure. Then as the young grow old, they teach their young, and it repeats, making it generational.

NOW
Combine ALL of it:
the GENERATIONAL INFO
the DATE-RAPE DRUGS
the PORN filming

WHAT SICK TWISTED BUT PROBABLY TRUE FINAL RESULT DO WE HAVE?


And people make fun of my Shango...twisted indeed.    :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:01:21 AM
Anna
I see where you are going and I agree... it is hard to make heads or tails out of this stuff...we just have to keep digging and looking...the truth is there and it might just be very simple.  Then again...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:02:08 AM
Peeps
I am the owner of Boost Unit website and the webmaster of the speedshop. I don't know what your deal is with us or anything. We don't have nor want anything to do with some stupid teens, americans, dutch, surinam or any nationality whatsoever involved with this annoying case. We don't know that teen Joran nor his 3 chocolate factory buddies. They are not of our age bracket. We are some motorsports fans and that's all there is to it.


Peeps
knew about this site from the newspapers, plus its name is pretty "catchy". I got my monthly referrals report today (Aug 1) and what do I see? More than 50 referrals from the famous NH connected "scared monkeys". The purpose of this particular speculation forum is all good. I just don't want our names stickied on the internet,especially something that we have no part in. This is not the first time that somebody wants to connect us with the fatass dutchy. I did a typo, I meant 2 chocolate buddies.


Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Peeps
He's 26. The same as me. He's the same person. Maxito = Little Max in papiamento. A childhood name that got stuck till now. I just notified one of the detectives again about this piece, just in case some false accusations come up. Just taking precautions. If there are more questions I can answer them as far as I can. You can put a separate thread or something or email.


Peeps
I wouldn't know if Joran has a lot of friends or not. You have to take personal sites like Tickle, Hi5, Myspace with a tiny grain of salt. Everyone on that site are the best friends, the kindest people, the best personalities, the biggest pimps, the sharpest girls, a whole lotta hoopla. It's a big game of distraction and illusions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:02:46 AM
I don't know how these streets and addresses work in Aruba.  So I will need help here.  If anyone knows email Klaas and she will forward to my email.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:02:52 AM
Klaas-

Google earth returned something but I am unsure if it's just a central point of ref on Aruba or that address? It won't tell me  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 14, 2006, 01:03:19 AM
Nice Work Here

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=539

Hammer bows low in respect.  

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 01:03:29 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
no I don't wear the crown jewels so I don't qualify  :lol:  8)

 :lol:  And there ya have it.

That's gonna gas up *somebodys* tank for another few weeks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 14, 2006, 01:03:53 AM
Didn't Dave say in his book that Jacobs had crossed out Lorenzo as a suspect ( on a map on the the office wall ) for no apparent reason that was offered other than to say, "he has an alibi"??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:05:05 AM
Quote from: "vms"
Peeps
I am the owner of Boost Unit website and the webmaster of the speedshop. I don't know what your deal is with us or anything. We don't have nor want anything to do with some stupid teens, americans, dutch, surinam or any nationality whatsoever involved with this annoying case. We don't know that teen Joran nor his 3 chocolate factory buddies. They are not of our age bracket. We are some motorsports fans and that's all there is to it.


Peeps
knew about this site from the newspapers, plus its name is pretty "catchy". I got my monthly referrals report today (Aug 1) and what do I see? More than 50 referrals from the famous NH connected "scared monkeys". The purpose of this particular speculation forum is all good. I just don't want our names stickied on the internet,especially something that we have no part in. This is not the first time that somebody wants to connect us with the fatass dutchy. I did a typo, I meant 2 chocolate buddies.


Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Peeps
He's 26. The same as me. He's the same person. Maxito = Little Max in papiamento. A childhood name that got stuck till now. I just notified one of the detectives again about this piece, just in case some false accusations come up. Just taking precautions. If there are more questions I can answer them as far as I can. You can put a separate thread or something or email.


Peeps
I wouldn't know if Joran has a lot of friends or not. You have to take personal sites like Tickle, Hi5, Myspace with a tiny grain of salt. Everyone on that site are the best friends, the kindest people, the best personalities, the biggest pimps, the sharpest girls, a whole lotta hoopla. It's a big game of distraction and illusions.


And yet he goes to his parties and provides an alibi for him to ALE...now what is wrong with this picture? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:05:23 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Nice Work Here

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=539

Hammer bows low in respect.  

.


come join us, we've missed you hammer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 01:06:00 AM
VMS ~ that's great! TKU


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:06:28 AM
Thanks vms.....
This  is a very interesting post of Peeps.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:06:37 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Didn't Dave say in his book that Jacobs had crossed out Lorenzo as a suspect ( on a map on the the office wall ) for no apparent reason that was offered other than to say, "he has an alibi"??


And we are going to believe him...yeah right. :roll:  Jacobs, I mean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:06:45 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
no I don't wear the crown jewels so I don't qualify  :lol:  8)

 :lol:  And there ya have it.

That's gonna gas up *somebodys* tank for another few weeks.


ahem, I have it on 'good authority' that one must have a thick skin to endure the WWW  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 01:07:05 AM
Looks to me like Peeps was giving you all the straight talk.

My kinda guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:07:25 AM
Hi Hammer are you here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:08:18 AM
vms-

Thank you for bringing the posts, I do appreciate it and hope you will stay to brainstorm with us.

Note also the reference to 3 choc factory buddies then corrected to say 2?

Dutchlady said this long ago..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:08:21 AM
I have a few more if anyone is interested and I also think I know who he is...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:08:57 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Looks to me like Peeps was giving you all the straight talk.

My kinda guy.


yep and Lala's built the bridge so don't you be pickin on the Lala's anymore  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:09:23 AM
Quote from: "vms"
I have a few more if anyone is interested and I also think I know who he is...


please vms, I'd like very much to hear your thoughts and insights.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:10:19 AM
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:10:28 AM
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:10:37 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas-

Google earth returned something but I am unsure if it's just a central point of ref on Aruba or that address? It won't tell me  :lol:

I think the only thing google earth has for Aruba is Oranjestad


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:10:44 AM
Sure would like to hear vms tonights the night to get things off your chest and breath easier....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 01:11:26 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
ahem, I have it on 'good authority' that one must have a thick skin to endure the WW  :wink:

Thick skin i have. But enduring WW was near impossible. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:11:29 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Looks to me like Peeps was giving you all the straight talk.

My kinda guy.


yep and Lala's built the bridge so don't you be pickin on the Lala's anymore  :lol:


Yeah, and I used Shango/Simian to do it...so there. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:11:47 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?

I know ALE searched I Guido's home and took a quad racer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:13:12 AM
now WHY would they take a quad racer ???????? or am I stupid?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 14, 2006, 01:13:15 AM
Quote from: "Florida"
Please do not discuss secrets in front of me.

What does this mean?

Everyone seems to know who Simian is. Who AG lives next door to,
who Shango is, some party that Natalee was taken to, speak in some sort of code today.
Shows us a pix of a guy that looks like Paulus, but too bad the flag thing is in front of his face. Beth says in June that Natalee met Paulus in the casino. Show us a pix of the backend of some guy and says Is this Paulus ? Shows us a pix of a guy in a van, but too bad you can't see his face. Look in the southwest part of the island. MLP6 says its being done. Posts deleted.
And I can't follow this story line anymore. I just can't make any sense of this. Joran did it, but are all these other people guilty ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:13:40 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?

I know ALE searched I Guido's home and took a quad racer.


I took Locoman to be Freddie in that post. Do you think he is possibly refering to Guido instead?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:13:43 AM
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:13:57 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
ahem, I have it on 'good authority' that one must have a thick skin to endure the WW  :wink:

Thick skin i have. But enduring WW was near impossible. :wink:


I meant to type WWW  :lol: but WW was tough too  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:14:59 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


Give me a sec, klaas. Let me get all the links that led me to that conclusion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:15:02 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


That is Peeps.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:15:07 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?

I know ALE searched I Guido's home and took a quad racer.


I took Locoman to be Freddie in that post. Do you think he is possibly refering to Guido instead?

No, I took it to be Freddy as well.  Just mentioning the other quad racer reference.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 01:15:32 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?

I know ALE searched I Guido's home and took a quad racer.


I took Locoman to be Freddie in that post. Do you think he is possibly refering to Guido instead?


Never know, but I imagine several folks on the island have quad racers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:15:41 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


That is Peeps.

Thank you Lala's.  Need to dry my hair now, brb.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 01:16:44 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?

I know ALE searched I Guido's home and took a quad racer.


I took Locoman to be Freddie in that post. Do you think he is possibly refering to Guido instead?



Hello!  Hello!  Can anybody see MY posts???  

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:18:10 AM
I notice the Lopez dude lists as his interests:    Go fast on wheels or wings or water,  

Guess that's appropriate for a gu who works in a speed shop.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:18:37 AM
Anna
I see you...I really do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 14, 2006, 01:19:04 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


Did anyone notice that Gerald is his "friend" at tickle? The one with the white dodge truck that was discussed at length.

Hey you guys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:19:07 AM
Hi Anna I read you loud and clear.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 14, 2006, 01:19:49 AM
Dutchlady --

"...(a recall of what DutchLady had said in the past, and Sandy Leiva, our Aruban language translator)..."

She told us all the path to truth so long ago now...she knew the ways of Paulus and the rest of the deviants.

Beyond evangelicism, is Catholicism.  And all of the mid-ranges held thereto.  A reprise for those who have forgotten:

A profusely sweating husband who is used to hearing deviant behaviour charges and has knowledge of criminology and behaviours as one would expect of a judge in training is showing on camera extreme unease. The veins stand out on his forehead, he evades the cameras lens, and takes the opportunity to escape to the phone. On coming back the sweat running down his face is gone, he is composed again. He is not in his wifes emotional circle as he was responsible for his son, when his son went out to take this girl. a persons daughter, in the middle of the night. His whole attitude from the start has been wrong in what he should have done listening the remarks from Natalees husband and his statements. Now that the island sees this the emotional card come in. It is too little to late.

Joran and his friends I believe would take the easiest route as do not like to get themselves dirty on public beaches, there is no evidence they do this. I suggest that the rage pattern is abandonment rage, and remember his mother was away in Holland. If Joran took someone home to his flat and no one was there, the dogs, and cars would not be noticed. The excuse of the computer and call I put forward as to be is a red herrring, for he was there already I would say as the easiest thing that could be done at this time of the night. This is a lad that eats at fast food outlets, not gourmet restaurants and frequents casino's with someone elses money. Does he work???

Therefore in my research of predator disposal patterns I have found whether a living person is held hostage, or killed, it depends on the mind of the highest in the pack, and at present I do not have a fixed point of the main decision maker. That is why I feel more arrests have to come. This is way to specialised for a 17 year old in that their is no sign of the girl or her belongings since he took her with him, not the other way round. A more advanced mind and some planning results in hiding evidence and a person, as some dispose in the open, or run away, none of these did this. They blamed a lower socio ecomic workers as escaping so they thought justice. They lied, and lied and lied and implicated others which is an offence. Perverting the course of justice, lying in a police statement, using up public funded resources, etc, etc. The father knows something that is clear from his biological actions shown on camera with his wife, what that is he has divulge to his wife, the police, and his superiors. He is at risk of a stroke if this pressure keeps up, and would worry more of his health than his deviant son and his friends. None of their family of those incarcerated is saying it is a nightmare, or coming forward and one must ask are they silenced in this for some reason???

I also think the Deepak email, at least one is in part genuine, but as the whole message heading is missing it could have been deleted by someone as the names are.  We must not let this be seen emotional blackmail as families as personality disorder specialists know are apt to be in denial because of its financial,social and communitiy implications. Every consulting room sees such denials. Natalee I would be looking for at that house and around the estate that is off limits to the public. Reasonable assumption in all missing persons cases as starting point. Remember Fred West. No one was missing till a rumour started. Remember Jamie Bulger. Remember Amber Swartz, Nicky Campbell, the latter are still causing a cloud over one person even though he is in an elevated position. 'Stalemate'. is very apt.


June 23, 2005, Scared Monkeys, DutchLady.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 01:19:58 AM
Quote from: "Anna"


Hello!  Hello!  Can anybody see MY posts???  

 :roll:


I can see your posts, but I can't see the second image in your SIG.

Is that just my problem?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:20:47 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
From VMS post:
Peeps
Maxito is one of my best friends. We go everywhere together. This rumor also spread on the street. Frankly we were pretty scared about this false accusation. Long story short, the detectives already know about this and have straightened out this false rumor. He doesn't know this guy Lorenzo. Locoman came once with his mom to the shop to get some quotations for parts for his Quad racer. that's it. We don't know locoman nor his following. Also we don't want to know anything about him. We stick to our motto "minding our own business."


Does anyone else remember the news flash about the "quad racer" that Tito made one night? They were looking for it or something like that?

I know ALE searched I Guido's home and took a quad racer.


Yes, and I wasn't implying that it was Lorenzo's just asking if anyone remembered it. Sorry, I wasn't making myself clear.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 01:21:26 AM
When we asked TITO about the Lorenzo who was taken in for questioning early, he responded Lorenzo Wever and proceeded to describe Guido.  That seemed to be the only Lorenzo Tito knew anything about and he had the wrong first name.

Then later, Guido's quad racer is taken when his house is finally searched?  I am just not so sure we don't have these two people some way combined into one.  Yes, freddie would be locoman as usual.

Also, BTW, as with most of Aruba, Maxito fancies himself a DJ but then don't they all?  He used to have a really kwel website about that, however.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:21:41 AM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


Did anyone notice that Gerald is his "friend" at tickle? The one with the white dodge truck that was discussed at length.

Hey you guys!


That truck? :roll: I missed that...good work CBB.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:22:18 AM
karen
hey peeps! do you know if locoman is known to hang out at casinos? also, is it true his dad committed suicide a coupla yrs ago?

Peeps
His dad owned the Volkswagen dealership here. He killed himself a couple of years ago, that's correct. The dealership is still there, but I don't know if they still have it or whatnot. locoman has a lot of money, but rumors have it that he's misusing the money. I think he doesn't even has to work for the rest of his life. locoman has 2 houses, and I got to know that he used to throw some heavy parties at his homes. That's how much I know. I have no clue if he frequents the casinos / hotels.

new girl
Peeps, is Lorenzo a different guy than locoman? Up until now, everyone said that Lorenzo was the son of the VW businessman who committed suicide and who has two houses and inherited $$.

Peeps
 I thought Lorenzo = locoman from previous post. Excuse me if I had understood wrong. So basically it's just old news to you guys.

jozee
I thought Lorenzo and locoman were two different people. Lorenzo is someone who we don't have a pic of, although several people think it's the guy with the blonde dredlocks. Locoman is a dark island-looking person? Am I wrong? I'd like to know who is Alexxx the ax guy! And why does he carry around an ax?

Peeps
Ok. Locoman, no clue who he is. Lorenzo, saw him once. He's a tall Dutch looking fellow. You guys know more about him than me I see. You only need a pic of him.

I hear Shango
If Peeps is from aruba, and goes "everywhere" with Maxito...perhaps Peeps will tell us how the party was that night.

Peeps
We don't go to tourist places. As a matter of fact we haven't been to Carlos and Charlies this year even. We are over that type of party stage. You're beginning to sound like the dumb blonde Nancy Disgrace, simma downa.

I hear Shango
 I didn't ask if you went to tourist places..I asked about the party...and before you call me dumb....you should think twice...I have just proven myself smarter than the entire LE....and many others in Aruba.

Peeps
Ok, Another smart comment in there but whatever floats your party boat is fine with me. Dunno what party, like all other questions you've asked me: Not Applicable. Another FYI, the Mansurs are one of the wealthiest families on the island, and also with many business related stories as you will find out sooner or later in your quest. Go fetch.

Peeps
Grasshopper sees the tip of the Iceberg and thinks deeply........"I think that's the whole Iceberg". Ok, enough busting I hear shango's balls. I really don't think the Mansur will connect you to NH case. They have extensive shady practices but I don't foresee any connection. Karen, you see what I mean. I am a native. I know as many other islanders about the M's. Alot of which are not on the web. Now I get an internet worm who just found last week what Aruba is, telling me he/she has everything. We are laughing so hard at this that we are having headaches.

karen
i hear ya, peeps, i get the headaches, too! won't you pleez tell us some lorenzo stories??

rockyroads
oh magic crystal ball - i see some arrests

I hear Shango
Peeps...I see the whole iceberg...better run....unless you are a VERY good swimmer...

Peeps
I hear Shango, My applogies to you for being rude. Sometimes it's needed to get the point across, and it's my favourite tool. No hard feelings.

rockyroads
hey peeps, are you a poker player? at the casinos much? i'm sorry to ask so many questions man i am just happy to talk to someone from the real island

Peeps
Yes I am a poker player. We play at home pretty much. We try to get out of the casinos as much as possible. There are quite a few stories about locals losing tons of money in casinos. From time to time we go casino sight seeing if you will call it and also the $50- $100.000 big Bingos at La Cabana and Renaissance Casino. Any more questions feel free, I will try to answer them. As for the smart a$$ comments, I'll try to give them the stick.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:23:54 AM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Andry Lopez

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=cDGgfFyytLSGHJU6


VMS - who is Andry Lopez?  I may have missed it, TIA. Looks to be Lorenzo's age and Maxito's age.


Did anyone notice that Gerald is his "friend" at tickle? The one with the white dodge truck that was discussed at length.

Hey you guys!


He also lists Max as one of his friends....

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=dPqDvFD2-iH_FhDE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:25:08 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Some of the old codetalkers still have the Peeps posts.  One sent to me not that long ago, few months.  Now sure if I kept it or what I might have filed it under but I guess I am the only one who doesn't think the party at LVR involved.

Not sure exactly why but don't think he is the major player in this that many do.  I think he was called in for questioning as the local resident strange person pretty much but don't make much further connection.

I always thought AG posting at MajorWager might be a gambling connection, too.   8)

But we were told LVR uses a different last name in The Netherlands.  Don't know if that part is true or not for we never know what is true and what isn't.  Do we even know he was called in for questioning for a fact?  Remember when we tried to ask that irrefutable source TITO, he gave us the fictional character Lorenzo Wever.

Since that was finally cleared up, I have wondered if it was really Guido Wever called in early or Lorenzo.  Too much double talk out of Aruba.

.


Who knows..it could be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 01:26:29 AM
ohhh...this is getting good.

Hi Anna! I'm still thinking about your Guido/Lorenzo statement.  :wink:

Hi Crazymom.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:28:24 AM
from VMS post:
Peeps
Ok. Locoman, no clue who he is. Lorenzo, saw him once. He's a tall Dutch looking fellow. You guys know more about him than me I see. You only need a pic of him.


And once again...this guys goes everywhere with Max and Max is Lorenzo's alibi...and Peeps doesn't know him...but he goes everywhere with Max... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 14, 2006, 01:28:44 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
ohhh...this is getting good.

Hi Anna! I'm still thinking about your Guido/Lorenzo statement.  :wink:

Hi Crazymom.

Hi Memphis!

Klaas did you get my email for Mrs.Red?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:29:40 AM
Hi Anna-

I"m scattered, also cooking a big pot of chili so I must have missed your posts until this last one.

Hammer-

Interesting to look back and see the insights DL had even that early on? Even the lying in the statements was so clear to her?

VMS-

Thank you, still trying to read thru it all. Did anyone else see "nelson" also listed as a friend? We did have a Nelson posting here and this fella is dutch on the tickle site?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:30:24 AM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "memphis"
ohhh...this is getting good.

Hi Anna! I'm still thinking about your Guido/Lorenzo statement.  :wink:

Hi Crazymom.

Hi Memphis!

Klaas did you get my email for Mrs.Red?


Yep, I'll forward it tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:30:41 AM
From Peeps (aka Andry Lopez) website:

:: Special Thanks ::

:: The ones that helped / or are still helping me one way or another with this project ::
Mom and Dad, who tollerate the mess in the garage.
Brother Ilan, who helped me with troubleshooting electronic problems and the polishing work.
Statio Baker and Carib Racing Crew in Daytona Beach, Florida.
Rayon Koolman
Marlon Maduro
Marlon Dubero
Lito Kock
Marvin Maduro
Manuel Cristo. Engine paint job and stock body moldings.
Jean Carlo Reyes "Puchi" @ King's Care Garage, Pos Chikito.
Ryan Bareno, Parts delivery in Miami.
Max Arendsz @ Aruba Speed Shop.
Orlando Bello @ Aruba Speed Shop.
Rigo Croeze
Gerald Rasmijn
Clinton Kock " Chino "
Jarzino Arendsz " Echie " *RIP Bro*
Urbine Donata " BinBin "
Eddie Kelly @ El Viejo Shan Racing.
Shaniro Kelly @ El Viejo Shan Racing.
Shandre Kelly @ El Viejo Shan Racing.
Cecil Bronswinkel " Checho " @ Match & Go Racing.
Kenny Theysen
Adrian Moen Orlando, FL.
Rayon Kelly
JJ Dayananni

http://www.boostunit.com/specialthanks.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 01:32:03 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Nice Work Here

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=539

Hammer bows low in respect.  

.


Just don't read past the SECTION 1 header, as that goes past the first 48 hours.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 01:33:08 AM
Quote from: "vms"

Peeps
Yes I am a poker player. We play at home pretty much. We try to get out of the casinos as much as possible. There are quite a few stories about locals losing tons of money in casinos. From time to time we go casino sight seeing if you will call it and also the $50- $100.000 big Bingos at La Cabana and Renaissance Casino. Any more questions feel free, I will try to answer them. As for the smart a$$ comments, I'll try to give them the stick.


Wonder if he refering to any particular Dutch type locals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:33:35 AM
Hey Sleuth! How are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 01:35:36 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
from VMS post:
Peeps
Ok. Locoman, no clue who he is. Lorenzo, saw him once. He's a tall Dutch looking fellow. You guys know more about him than me I see. You only need a pic of him.


And once again...this guys goes everywhere with Max and Max is Lorenzo's alibi...and Peeps doesn't know him...but he goes everywhere with Max... :roll:


Or Guido?   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:36:52 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
from VMS post:
Peeps
Ok. Locoman, no clue who he is. Lorenzo, saw him once. He's a tall Dutch looking fellow. You guys know more about him than me I see. You only need a pic of him.


And once again...this guys goes everywhere with Max and Max is Lorenzo's alibi...and Peeps doesn't know him...but he goes everywhere with Max... :roll:


Or Guido?   :roll:


So if it is Guido...why didn't his attorney say he had an airtight alibi?  Or did he?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 14, 2006, 01:37:46 AM
Maybe this is a silly question...but could Lorenzo's house be considered to be on the southwest portion of the island?.......isn't that where there was to have been an announcement involving that area? I'm really fishing HUH?

Time for me to go to bed........Nite Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:37:49 AM
Does anyone have access to the paragraph in Dave's book where he refers to Lorenzo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 01:39:11 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Maybe this is a silly question...but could Lorenzo's house be considered to be on the southwest portion of the island?.......isn't that where there was to have been an announcement involving that area? I'm really fishing HUH?

Time for me to go to bed........Nite Monkeys!


Yes, Lorenzo's house would be SW (the white one that you see the ocean in the background)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:39:28 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Maybe this is a silly question...but could Lorenzo's house be considered to be on the southwest portion of the island?.......isn't that where there was to have been an announcement involving that area? I'm really fishing HUH?

Time for me to go to bed........Nite Monkeys!


YES


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:40:40 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Maybe this is a silly question...but could Lorenzo's house be considered to be on the southwest portion of the island?.......isn't that where there was to have been an announcement involving that area? I'm really fishing HUH?

Time for me to go to bed........Nite Monkeys!


Maybe there is a map? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 01:40:41 AM
Hello Lala's...I hope you are feeling better ....I was swinging by to make sure you hugged Nemo tonight  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:41:30 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Hello Lala's...I hope you are feeling better ....I was swinging by to make sure you hugged Nemo tonight  :wink:


Always.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:42:51 AM
Klaas
You get to bed and we will get the lights.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 01:43:07 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
[
So if it is Guido...why didn't his attorney say he had an airtight alibi?  Or did he?



Lala's,
I have no idea what Guido's attorney might have said or not said.  I don't even know if he had one for those early days.

But he surely had lawyered up in the meantime, hiring one of the best in all of Europe.  Odd that, for someone not involved in any way.  Must have cost his family a small fortune.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:43:51 AM
Sleuth-

It is good to see you, wish you'd come by more often. You know Lala's and I met this fall and her hugs in person are the best  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:44:00 AM
Okay, I really messed that one up...I meant Bleached, not Klaas. Sorry. :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:44:42 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
You get to bed and we will get the lights.  :wink:

Nope, I'm good for another 15-20 minutes.  Then I watch the news and Letterman  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:46:03 AM
Some of the links below that led me to Andry. The others include email addresses so I was unsure about posting...


Andry's Toyota Supra:
Member ID: Grumpy_Monkey
Name: Andry
Location: Santa Cruz, Aruba
Member Since: Apr 29, 2003
Grumpy_Monkey's Garage
1994 Toyota Supra
http://www.cardomain.com/id/Grumpy_Monkey


Andry Lopez
http://gigablast.com/get?d=135292803038
See the car photo linked from above: http://www.boostunit.com/top30/uploads/andry_l.jpg


View Profile: Grumpy
Signature
1994 Toyota Supra Turbo
648 RWHP
ERAU Alumni
One Happy Island Aruba, Dutch Caribbean

Additional Information Group Memberships
Date of Birth:
July 3, 1979
Age:
27
Location:
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Occupation:
Airport Management
Home Page:
http://www.boostunit.com

http://www.ermca.com/forum/member.php?u=148


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:46:46 AM
Klaas-

Honestly my google earth did not zoom into Orangestead but a cluster of homes outside of it when I input that address, I may send you the link, ok?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:48:08 AM
Well, let's see Guido worked in the casino and was working the night of the crime...so how would Max be an alibi unless, he was with him. Now, how do we connect Max, who has Peeps with him all the time, to Guido the croupier?  Too bad we can't ask Peeps if he knows Guido.  If Max provided the alibi, then Guido and Max must have been together at some time during that time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 01:48:12 AM
Well, I am in the position of the contrarian on most points of view tonight so rather than be difficult will call it a night.

But one last question and I think Florida is already gone.  Isn't that psychedelic looking house the Paint Ball Ranch?  Does it belong to Lorenzo as well?

Good night monkeys, carry on and find all the answers you can!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 01:48:23 AM
Nite Bleached. It's been fun.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:48:52 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas-

Honestly my google earth did not zoom into Orangestead but a cluster of homes outside of it when I input that address, I may send you the link, ok?

Maybe they've updated Google Earth now.  Thanks send me the links but I may not look at it until tomorrow, OK?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:49:20 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Sleuth-

It is good to see you, wish you'd come by more often. You know Lala's and I met this fall and her hugs in person are the best  :wink:


You are way too sweet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 01:49:32 AM
Nite Anna.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:49:34 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Well, I am in the position of the contrarian on most points of view tonight so rather than be difficult will call it a night.

But one last question and I think Florida is already gone.  Isn't that psychedelic looking house the Paint Ball Ranch?  Does it belong to Lorenzo as well?

Good night monkeys, carry on and find all the answers you can!

.

Nite Anna


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:51:06 AM
Thanks VMS for the Peeps info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:51:20 AM
Night Anna, and I always like your opposing views...keeps me on my toes. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: vms on November 14, 2006, 01:51:47 AM
Cafe Bahia, Mambo Jambo & Karma 22 Sep 2006

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/AndryLopez-Sept.jpg)


I Love Muzika Cu Halloween Party Na Havana 28 Oct 2006
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/PeepsakaAndryLopez.jpg)
Andry is on the left.


Just interesting that Andry apparently also plays tennis:
http://www.itftennis.com/juniors/players/player.asp?player=30018450


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:52:06 AM
Nonesy
Who you looking for Stratten?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 01:52:08 AM
Well, I'm going to have to put my little monkey head on the pillow.

It's been very interesting tonight with all of you.

There were about 35 people on at one time. That's more than there's been in a long time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:52:13 AM
Night Bleached and Anna, rest well !

Klaas I'm on the lappy so I don't have a way to snag-it, so I'll email you the link, no hurry for I know you have class tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:53:05 AM
Night Memphis, we can tango tomorrow night if you want.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: memphis on November 14, 2006, 01:53:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Night Memphis, we can tango tomorrow night if you want.


I'll be here.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:54:10 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Who you looking for Stratten?


yep and I just took my lazy self to the toolbar and was able to save this image as a .jpg........go figure ! I'll email it to you too, ok?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 01:54:29 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Sleuth-

It is good to see you, wish you'd come by more often. You know Lala's and I met this fall and her hugs in person are the best  :wink:


Hiya None,

I believe you, I can tell by Lala's avatar  :wink:

Sharon, TerryD and I might have to meet up sometime.  I see that Sharon and I were at the same festival on Riverwalk a week ago, and that I was less than a mile from where Terry was bike riding on Saturday....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 01:54:32 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL - see you tomorrow afternoon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 01:54:39 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone have access to the paragraph in Dave's book where he refers to Lorenzo?

I do. Whaddaya want?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:56:32 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Sleuth-

It is good to see you, wish you'd come by more often. You know Lala's and I met this fall and her hugs in person are the best  :wink:


Hiya None,

I believe you, I can tell by Lala's avatar  :wink:

Sharon, TerryD and I might have to meet up sometime.  I see that Sharon and I were at the same festival on Riverwalk a week ago, and that I was less than a mile from where Terry was bike riding on Saturday....
a

well that would definitely be a fun group for sure, you should all meet and do something really fun - plus I want to know if Terry looks like a squirrel in person  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 01:57:07 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GOODNIGHT ALL - see you tomorrow afternoon!


Hugs and rest well our fearless leader Klaas !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 01:57:23 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone have access to the paragraph in Dave's book where he refers to Lorenzo?

I do. Whaddaya want?


What exactly did he say about Lorenzo and his alibi?  Did Dave ask him if he was questioned or what?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 01:57:42 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, let's see Guido worked in the casino and was working the night of the crime...so how would Max be an alibi unless, he was with him. Now, how do we connect Max, who has Peeps with him all the time, to Guido the croupier?  Too bad we can't ask Peeps if he knows Guido.  If Max provided the alibi, then Guido and Max must have been together at some time during that time.


I think your Max's and Lorenzo's getting a bit mixed.

Peeps said the speedshop Max know Lorenzo VR.

Peeps said he had only seen Lorenzo VR and he was a tall Dutch guy.

Peeps and speedshop Max have no mention of Guido.

Peeps mentions Lorenzo VR coming to shop for quad racer info.

Peeps confuses the SM use of 'locoman' to be Lorenzo VR and gets corrected.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 01:59:59 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Does anyone have access to the paragraph in Dave's book where he refers to Lorenzo?

I do. Whaddaya want?


What exactly did he say about Lorenzo and his alibi?  Did Dave ask him if he was questioned or what?

Hold on. There is a bit more than a paragraph. I will try and summarize.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:01:12 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Who you looking for Stratten?


yep and I just took my lazy self to the toolbar and was able to save this image as a .jpg........go figure ! I'll email it to you too, ok?


Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 02:01:54 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, let's see Guido worked in the casino and was working the night of the crime...so how would Max be an alibi unless, he was with him. Now, how do we connect Max, who has Peeps with him all the time, to Guido the croupier?  Too bad we can't ask Peeps if he knows Guido.  If Max provided the alibi, then Guido and Max must have been together at some time during that time.


Lalas,
Had to sign back in and everything but did not want you to waste your time on this.  No, not saying the above at all, I just don't think LVR was much of a factor early.  I think the one with the party alibi was FREDDIE instead of LVR.  I don't think there was any party or alibi other than the ones provided for Freddie.  

Like LVR being the boy from "earlier in the week" (not unless he was in Alabama!) I think we are getting bits and pieces only and not anything concrete enough to use as a fact.  It is ALL totally scrambled in my most humble opinion.  So I don't think LVR was given the alibi of hosting a party, etc, because it never came up but that was asked about Freddie.

I see it as one situation being applied to the wrong person very often since we really don't have any list of who was questioned, etc.  We were hearing just a little from this one and a little from another one when they could have been talking about the same suspect or witness, not always a different one.

Can't really explain but hope you can make some sense out of what I am trying to say.

Good Night!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 02:03:55 AM
http://www.ranchonotorious.com/arubaphotos.shtml

Aruba quad racing tour


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:04:10 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, let's see Guido worked in the casino and was working the night of the crime...so how would Max be an alibi unless, he was with him. Now, how do we connect Max, who has Peeps with him all the time, to Guido the croupier?  Too bad we can't ask Peeps if he knows Guido.  If Max provided the alibi, then Guido and Max must have been together at some time during that time.


I think your Max's and Lorenzo's getting a bit mixed.

Peeps said the speedshop Max know Lorenzo VR.

Peeps said he had only seen Lorenzo VR and he was a tall Dutch guy.

Peeps and speedshop Max have no mention of Guido.

Peeps mentions Lorenzo VR coming to shop for quad racer info.

Peeps confuses the SM use of 'locoman' to be Lorenzo VR and gets corrected.


Actually I don't.  I am thinking along the same lines you are.  That Max and Peeps really do know Lorenzo and that Max provided the alibi.  Anna was the one that made me go in the other direction.  She seemed to think there was confusion as to who Tito was talking about.  So, I thought, well, let's see if Guido could be the one Tito meant and not Lorenzo.  Tito called the suspect Lorenzo Wever, so I was trying to make it fit...so far I can't.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:05:59 AM
Anna
I see your point...I am getting really confused here..I thought Freddy was spending the night at Joran's.  See why we need to figure this out. Maybe someone will sort it all out tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 02:07:27 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, let's see Guido worked in the casino and was working the night of the crime...so how would Max be an alibi unless, he was with him. Now, how do we connect Max, who has Peeps with him all the time, to Guido the croupier?  Too bad we can't ask Peeps if he knows Guido.  If Max provided the alibi, then Guido and Max must have been together at some time during that time.


I think your Max's and Lorenzo's getting a bit mixed.

Peeps said the speedshop Max know Lorenzo VR.

Peeps said he had only seen Lorenzo VR and he was a tall Dutch guy.

Peeps and speedshop Max have no mention of Guido.

Peeps mentions Lorenzo VR coming to shop for quad racer info.

Peeps confuses the SM use of 'locoman' to be Lorenzo VR and gets corrected.


Actually I don't.  I am thinking along the same lines you are.  That Max and Peeps really do know Lorenzo and that Max provided the alibi.  Anna was the one that made me go in the other direction.  She seemed to think there was confusion as to who Tito was talking about.  So, I thought, well, let's see if Guido could be the one Tito meant and not Lorenzo.  Tito called the suspect Lorenzo Wever, so I was trying to make it fit...so far I can't.


And I think Anna just explained it.

Tito's Lorenzo Wever aka Guide Wever and Freddie Locoman had the Alibi for Guido Wever that evening.

Peeps and Speedshop Max had nothing to do with the activities of the night and Anna seems to think and I agree that Lorenzo VR hasn't been shown to have any connection with the evenings activities.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 02:08:39 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Sleuth"

Sharon, TerryD and I might have to meet up sometime.  I see that Sharon and I were at the same festival on Riverwalk a week ago, and that I was less than a mile from where Terry was bike riding on Saturday....
a

well that would definitely be a fun group for sure, you should all meet and do something really fun - plus I want to know if Terry looks like a squirrel in person  :lol:


I already have a pic of him from the half-way stop on his bike trip.. :wink:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/TerryDbikebreak.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:08:45 AM
We got to this point of confusion trying to associate Simian's  reference to the 5th suspect having an alibi.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 02:09:49 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
We got to this point of confusion trying to associate Simian's  reference to the 5th suspect having an alibi.


See how that shango/simian stuff messes things up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 02:12:16 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/TerryDbikebreak.jpg)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I love it !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:12:35 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
We got to this point of confusion trying to associate Simian's  reference to the 5th suspect having an alibi.


See how that shango/simian stuff messes things up.


Actually, Lorenzo came up before we began talking about Shango tonight. But I refuse to argue the point with you any longer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 02:12:38 AM
Dave's Book  :arrow:  Lorenzo

I asked Jacobs to print me out another copy of my statement, and Art Wood came walking in. He noticed a computer printout on the wall about Natalee's case. It was a flowchart with all of the suspects and intersted parties on it. He noticed that one person who we thought was a suspect, Lorenzo van Rijn, rumored to be Joran's half brother, was not on it. We had been told that he might have had some connection to Natalee's disappearance. he is supposedly known on the island by the nickname Xtacy. Art asked him where Lorenzo was, and Jacobs said that Lorenzo had nothing to do with Natalee's case, so he doesn't have to be on the flowchart. There is talk in Aruba that Lorenzo is a known drug dealer who lives in a compound on the island with a remote controlled sliding gate, television monitors, and razor wire all around the top of the fence. Apparently, you cannot get into the place. It looks like a prison camp. Since Lorenzo is supposed to be related to Joran, if the boys got drugs to give to Natalee, they may have gotten them from him. There was also speculation that he has something to do with the rave houses that are discussed in the "Shango" appendix.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 02:14:25 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
http://www.ranchonotorious.com/arubaphotos.shtml

Aruba quad racing tour


The quads are pretty common - both via the tours you see at this site but also you can rent them and go on your own.  People take them up to the light house area and on many of the backroads to the eastern side of the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:14:35 AM
Thanks Igs.  I appreciate your help.  Makes me think there is something to this if Jacobs says there isn't.  Lead the family in the wrong direction once again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 02:14:56 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
We got to this point of confusion trying to associate Simian's  reference to the 5th suspect having an alibi.


See how that shango/simian stuff messes things up.


Actually, Lorenzo came up before we began talking about Shango tonight. But I refuse to argue the point with you any longer.


I thought you PROMISED Carnut  :P  now behave !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:16:46 AM
Promised him what? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 02:17:02 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
We got to this point of confusion trying to associate Simian's  reference to the 5th suspect having an alibi.


See how that shango/simian stuff messes things up.


Actually, Lorenzo came up before we began talking about Shango tonight. But I refuse to argue the point with you any longer.


I thought you PROMISED Carnut  :P  now behave !


Just trying to help folks keep their Lorenzo's and Max's straight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 02:17:12 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, let's see Guido worked in the casino and was working the night of the crime...so how would Max be an alibi unless, he was with him. Now, how do we connect Max, who has Peeps with him all the time, to Guido the croupier?  Too bad we can't ask Peeps if he knows Guido.  If Max provided the alibi, then Guido and Max must have been together at some time during that time.


I think your Max's and Lorenzo's getting a bit mixed.

Peeps said the speedshop Max know Lorenzo VR.

Peeps said he had only seen Lorenzo VR and he was a tall Dutch guy.

Peeps and speedshop Max have no mention of Guido.

Peeps mentions Lorenzo VR coming to shop for quad racer info.

Peeps confuses the SM use of 'locoman' to be Lorenzo VR and gets corrected.


Actually I don't.  I am thinking along the same lines you are.  That Max and Peeps really do know Lorenzo and that Max provided the alibi.  Anna was the one that made me go in the other direction.  She seemed to think there was confusion as to who Tito was talking about.  So, I thought, well, let's see if Guido could be the one Tito meant and not Lorenzo.  Tito called the suspect Lorenzo Wever, so I was trying to make it fit...so far I can't.


And I think Anna just explained it.

Tito's Lorenzo Wever aka Guide Wever and Freddie Locoman had the Alibi for Guido Wever that evening.

Peeps and Speedshop Max had nothing to do with the activities of the night and Anna seems to think and I agree that Lorenzo VR hasn't been shown to have any connection with the evenings activities.



Oh, Carnut, this is not a popular POV!  But thank goodness you at least understand where I am coming from with this.  Was beginning to think I was in Twilight Zone as I sometimes am, you know.

But even taking it one step farther, remember scubajap tried to sell us the bill of goods that Freddie's family reunion lasted ALL NIGHT long?  Most unusual as mine are good for about three hours then we all have to get away from each other, lol.  

So we have direct contradiction between scuba and Melody/Anita as to where Freddie was that night.  Don't think he was alibi for Guido but that is the only quad racer confiscated in this that I know anything about.  Not LVR's but Guido's was taken by the cops.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 02:19:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"

Oh, Carnut, this is not a popular POV!  But thank goodness you at least understand where I am coming from with this.  Was beginning to think I was in Twilight Zone as I sometimes am, you know.

But even taking it one step farther, remember scubajap tried to sell us the bill of goods that Freddie's family reunion lasted ALL NIGHT long?  Most unusual as mine are good for about three hours then we all have to get away from each other, lol.  

So we have direct contradiction between scuba and Melody/Anita as to where Freddie was that night.  Don't think he was alibi for Guido but that is the only quad racer confiscated in this that I know anything about.  Not LVR's but Guido's was taken by the cops.

.


Humm, them folks are really into the 'family reunion' thing, that's one of AVDS's alibis.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 14, 2006, 02:20:03 AM
Well my chili is done now so off to try to sleep, Lala's and Anna, hugs goodnight - good to see you Sleuth and Igsigs too !

Carnut, eat a worm  :lol: it's your tude and not your opinion that gets me dude!

Night all !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 02:20:49 AM
I know most people here think Shango/Simian is a bunch of crap...so be it.  I am just tired of arguing the point any longer...either you believe or not.  I don't care any longer...I should not have to defend my thoughts about Shango everytime I am here...just scroll on by if you don't want to read it...

Now, I am getting upset because I am tired so I will hug Nemo and call it a night.  I am tired of getting razzed about Simian and Shango.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 02:21:42 AM
Night None.

I'm out as well - good night all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 14, 2006, 02:22:32 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"

Oh, Carnut, this is not a popular POV!  But thank goodness you at least understand where I am coming from with this.  Was beginning to think I was in Twilight Zone as I sometimes am, you know.

But even taking it one step farther, remember scubajap tried to sell us the bill of goods that Freddie's family reunion lasted ALL NIGHT long?  Most unusual as mine are good for about three hours then we all have to get away from each other, lol.  

So we have direct contradiction between scuba and Melody/Anita as to where Freddie was that night.  Don't think he was alibi for Guido but that is the only quad racer confiscated in this that I know anything about.  Not LVR's but Guido's was taken by the cops.

.


Humm, them folks are really into the 'family reunion' thing, that's one of AVDS's alibis.


Yes, I remember the story Freddy has stayed the night at JVDS pad, but never really believed it and still don't.

He may have shown up later that night to assist with body disposal so the story of staying the night may have been needed just in case he was witnessed to be there that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 02:27:49 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I know most people here think Shango/Simian is a bunch of crap...so be it.  I am just tired of arguing the point any longer...either you believe or not.  I don't care any longer...I should not have to defend my thoughts about Shango everytime I am here...just scroll on by if you don't want to read it...

Now, I am getting upset because I am tired so I will hug Nemo and call it a night.  I am tired of getting razzed about Simian and Shango.   :roll:



Lalas - there are many posts, theories and thoughts.  All deserve respect, IMO (as long as they do not lose sight of the fact that Natalee's family continues to hurt over this).  Don't worry about posting about Simian and Shango - no different than discussing Lorenzo or Peeps or Tony's or AG or anyone else's posts.   Until someone absolutely proves Simian/Shango have no bearing, I think it deserves as much posting as anything else.

Check every detail. Check it twice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 14, 2006, 02:27:56 AM
Debbbie at BFN posted this Monday night:

Quote
Heads up... the next National Enquirer will have an article that will discuss the picture that we all have been talking about from video #24.  The edition will be on the newsstands this week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Anna on November 14, 2006, 02:32:26 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I know most people here think Shango/Simian is a bunch of crap...so be it.  I am just tired of arguing the point any longer...either you believe or not.  I don't care any longer...I should not have to defend my thoughts about Shango everytime I am here...just scroll on by if you don't want to read it...

Now, I am getting upset because I am tired so I will hug Nemo and call it a night.  I am tired of getting razzed about Simian and Shango.   :roll:


I hope I didn't upset you, Lalas, but I didn't mention S or S.  Imagine how I feel with the rare opinion the LVR had little or nothing to do with anything for that is just the same as heresy to say here so I do understand not wanting to defend every post.

And its not worth getting upset over because none of us knows what happened for a fact.  If we did, we wouldn't still be all speculating.  But I do think we take too much at face value some of the things we were told early on and the LVR stuff just reeks of a Julia inspired decoy to me.

That is just ME and you are entitled to think and Shango all you want and I hope you will.  Next time, I will just stay out of it.

Good night, all.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Sleuth on November 14, 2006, 02:33:30 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Debbbie at BFN posted this Monday night:

Quote
Heads up... the next National Enquirer will have an article that will discuss the picture that we all have been talking about from video #24.  The edition will be on the newsstands this week.


I had heard this earlier but had been told it in confidence.  An ex-monkey sold the pics....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 03:01:16 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Debbbie at BFN posted this Monday night:

Quote
Heads up... the next National Enquirer will have an article that will discuss the picture that we all have been talking about from video #24.  The edition will be on the newsstands this week.


I had heard this earlier but had been told it in confidence.  An ex-monkey sold the pics....

An ex-monkey owned the pics?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 14, 2006, 03:12:31 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Debbbie at BFN posted this Monday night:

Quote
Heads up... the next National Enquirer will have an article that will discuss the picture that we all have been talking about from video #24.  The edition will be on the newsstands this week.


I had heard this earlier but had been told it in confidence.  An ex-monkey sold the pics....

An ex-monkey owned the pics?


Sleuth - give it up, who sold the pix?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 14, 2006, 04:59:01 AM
Blonde contact NE about the picture and told them she had worked on it for a long time ect ect and they agreed to post it about the Natalee Holloway case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 14, 2006, 05:00:44 AM
Oops...Hi everyone!

was just lurking and thought I'd add my 2 cents in on the question.  :)
Back to lurking.

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 14, 2006, 06:50:34 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Florida - I don't remember who sent me what pictures and when.  If the white van photo came from you thank you!

I would like to know why LORENZO is an off limit subject as of July 2005??  In June we were told he's crazy, does drugs, holds rave parties.  Now he's  a saint that we aren't supposed to talk about.  I DON'T GET IT!


I don't get it either.....

I think the MYTH was bigger than the PERSON

Who I saw was a healthy, attractive young guy.
Not the "MYSTERIOUS LORENZO"

I think there ARE parties & POSSIBLY he has "BLACKMAIL" on certain people that frequent his parties.

His late father was "best friends" with Paulus
Paul van Rijn killed himself....
Demons plagued him, as well as drugs.


He was one of the first people afther JK2 and the Security Guards that was brought in for questioning.  There is a reason for that.  Either he is involved in some way or he knows something.  I don't give a crap how wholesome looking he is.


Scott Peterson was also clean cut and fairly normal looking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 14, 2006, 07:14:38 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Nice Work Here

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=539

Hammer bows low in respect.  

.


I think there is a pretty big assumption in this post that I think is incorrect.  This is the part:

On June 10th it was publicly released to the world-wide media that one of the suspects—either Joran Van Der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe, or Satish Kalpoe-- had confessed that Natalee was dead, had been buried at a given location

I feel that the confession was supposed to be from one of the security guards not one of the 3 REAL suspects.  I believe that was part of the framejob of the guards.  I think certian people didnt find out that the frame-up was blown wide open and were just going ahead as planned.  Someone in the ALE or wherever heard them announcing the confession and had to get everyone to back track in a hurry because the frame job had to be called off.  I believe this all fits into the timeline perfectly also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: blah on November 14, 2006, 07:16:02 AM
I have been getting this message this morning after making a post:

Could not connect to smtp host : 110 : Connection timed out

DEBUG MODE

Line : 112
File : smtp.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: sharon on November 14, 2006, 07:17:10 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"

Hiya None,

I believe you, I can tell by Lala's avatar  :wink:

Sharon, TerryD and I might have to meet up sometime.  I see that Sharon and I were at the same festival on Riverwalk a week ago, and that I was less than a mile from where Terry was bike riding on Saturday....


YES  :D


Title: morning all
Post by: Leslie on November 14, 2006, 07:54:33 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 14, 2006, 08:14:35 AM
This is a MUST READ today:
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/

AHATA admits there is a serious problem with tourism in Aruba
Tourist hurt in a quad racer accident
Kalpoe brothers go to court November 30th
Suspicious death of a Columbian man
Article about Deepak Kalpoe
A disturbing picture on page 3.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 08:33:39 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Debbbie at BFN posted this Monday night:

Quote
Heads up... the next National Enquirer will have an article that will discuss the picture that we all have been talking about from video #24.  The edition will be on the newsstands this week.


I had heard this earlier but had been told it in confidence.  An ex-monkey sold the pics....

I'm lurking prior to going to class but I'm really shocked by this.  If it's the screen capture I'm thinking it is, I was unable to reproduce it which makes me go hmmmmm.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/threadlock.jpg)

Actually the thread may lock prior to page 50, I'll warn you guys first  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 08:37:20 AM
From MF on FOB

In an interview with David Koch yesterday by the local media, he reminded them about the case that he has on November 30, 2006 with the Kalpoe Brothers. He insists that the case is just not to clear names in the Natalee Holloway case, but emphasized that the Kalpoe Brothers wanted the judge to either close the case against them or go to court and proof their involvment in the women's disappearance.

As we all know, this request was made back in July, but the court give the Prosecuter an extension, since there were "new developments" back then that the judge could not make a decision. The case was already delayed because the prosecuter did not give the judge all the documents in the case.

On November 1, 2006 they got a new problem. All the document, tapes and evidence were sent to the Netherlands to be reviewed. Koch said that the ALE reviewed them a few times over, the FBI reviewed them as well and now, just to show that there is nothing new or overlooked in this case, the Dutch will have the same opportunity to do so. He said that there is nothing new in the case. Nothing has changed for months.

He also informed that Kalpoe's request for a new working permit was denied in court (LAR). It has nothing to do with the case itself, but Aruba has a control, where those who ask for working permit can be denied based on a decision by the department of Labor. The immigration and naturalisation department issues work permits.

In Aruba, if there is any Aruban that can work for that job, a permit for a non-Aruban to work the same job is denied. Working permits are usually issued for areas where there is no Aruban available to fill that job, like construction workers, hotel employees and others.

With this sentencing it just prohibits Kalpoe to work at the Internet Cafe. But he can always apply for other openings elsewhere.


Title: Bits and pieces
Post by: Leslie on November 14, 2006, 08:39:35 AM
Rumour has it that Lorenzo's mother Astrid is married but...to who?  The new husband and stepfather might be the reason why this 5th suspect has become the phantom of the island.  
Notice that the name used, in the advertisement for the Visa card, is Mr. Good Lion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 14, 2006, 08:41:02 AM
Good morning.

Working and lurking as usual.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 14, 2006, 08:52:52 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
From MF on FOB

In an interview with David Koch yesterday by the local media, he reminded them about the case that he has on November 30, 2006 with the Kalpoe Brothers. He insists that the case is just not to clear names in the Natalee Holloway case, but emphasized that the Kalpoe Brothers wanted the judge to either close the case against them or go to court and proof their involvment in the women's disappearance.

As we all know, this request was made back in July, but the court give the Prosecuter an extension, since there were "new developments" back then that the judge could not make a decision. The case was already delayed because the prosecuter did not give the judge all the documents in the case.
On November 1, 2006 they got a new problem. All the document, tapes and evidence were sent to the Netherlands to be reviewed. Koch said that the ALE reviewed them a few times over, the FBI reviewed them as well and now, just to show that there is nothing new or overlooked in this case, the Dutch will have the same opportunity to do so. He said that there is nothing new in the case. Nothing has changed for months.
He also informed that Kalpoe's request for a new working permit was denied in court (LAR). It has nothing to do with the case itself, but Aruba has a control, where those who ask for working permit can be denied based on a decision by the department of Labor. The immigration and naturalisation department issues work permits.

In Aruba, if there is any Aruban that can work for that job, a permit for a non-Aruban to work the same job is denied. Working permits are usually issued for areas where there is no Aruban available to fill that job, like construction workers, hotel employees and others.

With this sentencing it just prohibits Kalpoe to work at the Internet Cafe. But he can always apply for other openings elsewhere.


No doubt the prosecutor has failed to give the judge all the documents in the case more than once.  No doubt in my mind at all.   :x

David Kock makes it sound as if the FBI has reviewed the case files and has concluded that nothing was overlooked; now they're waiting for the Dutch investigators to do the same.  I tend to doubt the FBI told them that.  

I find it hard to believe that there was no Aruban able to do the Internet Cafe job before the Holloway case, but now there is.  If Deepak is being prevented from working, it's probably because he crossed the Slooties.  While I have no sympathy for Deepak, this does sound suspicious to me - perhaps another case of Don't Mess with Anita and her boys.  

Thanks for the info, Igsigs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 14, 2006, 08:54:39 AM
How rude of me.  
Good morning, Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 09:01:53 AM
Morn LilPuma

I had the same questions as you. What ever happened to Papa Ramirez owning the Internet Cafe?

MF and Koch have me dizzy with the spinning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 09:12:51 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Morn LilPuma

I had the same questions as you. What ever happened to Papa Ramirez owning the Internet Cafe?

MF and Koch have me dizzy with the spinning.


According to the Aruba Chamber he still owns it:

http://206.48.100.138/registry/registry_search.afp


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 14, 2006, 09:13:20 AM
Maybe the knowledge that a work permit can be refused by the Aruban court using nutty reasoning,  explains the Kalpoe's subservience to the "judge's son" and the all powerful Judge (lol) van der Sloot and their silence.    It sounds as if an appeal would be pointless and financially impossible.   Now Nadira has 2 sons to support.  What will Deepak do -work in construction?  He hasn't got the physical ability.  Work at a hotel?Doubtful anyone would want his recognizable face around.  If he still owns a car he might consider becoming a taxi driver.  It seems that this action by the Aruban court might prompt silent Deepak to start SINGING.
Let's hope that the Kalpoe brothers can sing in perfect harmony.
P.S.  Don't they have any photocopiers in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 09:16:26 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'm lurking prior to going to class but I'm really shocked by this.  If it's the screen capture I'm thinking it is, I was unable to reproduce it which makes me go hmmmmm.

Klaas, what do you mean by *unable to reproduce*.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 09:20:56 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
P.S.  Don't they have any photocopiers in Aruba?

 :lol:

What? You don't like Aruba's new and improved reason for the court delay? Never a dull moment with these guys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 14, 2006, 09:21:19 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Debbbie at BFN posted this Monday night:

Quote
Heads up... the next National Enquirer will have an article that will discuss the picture that we all have been talking about from video #24.  The edition will be on the newsstands this week.


I had heard this earlier but had been told it in confidence.  An ex-monkey sold the pics....

I'm lurking prior to going to class but I'm really shocked by this.  If it's the screen capture I'm thinking it is, I was unable to reproduce it which makes me go hmmmmm.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/threadlock.jpg)

Actually the thread may lock prior to page 50, I'll warn you guys first  :wink:

So it will be in this weeks Enquirer right.  I will look for it when it comes out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 09:28:35 AM
Good morning monkeys...I have had sleep and now I am better.  Coffee anyone?  :D

BTW does anyone have a street map of Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 14, 2006, 09:29:01 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Maybe the knowledge that a work permit can be refused by the Aruban court using nutty reasoning,  explains the Kalpoe's subservience to the "judge's son" and the all powerful Judge (lol) van der Sloot and their silence.    It sounds as if an appeal would be pointless and financially impossible.   Now Nadira has 2 sons to support.  What will Deepak do -work in construction?  He hasn't got the physical ability.  Work at a hotel?Doubtful anyone would want his recognizable face around.  If he still owns a car he might consider becoming a taxi driver.  It seems that this action by the Aruban court might prompt silent Deepak to start SINGING.
Let's hope that the Kalpoe brothers can sing in perfect harmony.
P.S.  Don't they have any photocopiers in Aruba?


LMAO @ copier comment... wondering the same thing.

Catching a cab with Deepak driving is like asking Teddy Kennedy for a ride home from the beach.  

I don't think so.

Personally, I don't care one iota about Deepak's livelihood or that of his brother or their lying mother.  I'm surprised they haven't been deported for being a nuisance to the almighty Dutch.  

Perhaps if the Kalpoe's ability to put food on the table declines, they will be inclined to show Mama that everybody DOESN'T LIE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 09:29:30 AM
Hi San, good morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 14, 2006, 09:33:32 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I know most people here think Shango/Simian is a bunch of crap...so be it.  I am just tired of arguing the point any longer...either you believe or not.  I don't care any longer...I should not have to defend my thoughts about Shango everytime I am here...just scroll on by if you don't want to read it...

Now, I am getting upset because I am tired so I will hug Nemo and call it a night.  I am tired of getting razzed about Simian and Shango.   :roll:


Lalas - there are many posts, theories and thoughts.  All deserve respect, IMO (as long as they do not lose sight of the fact that Natalee's family continues to hurt over this).  Don't worry about posting about Simian and Shango - no different than discussing Lorenzo or Peeps or Tony's or AG or anyone else's posts.   Until someone absolutely proves Simian/Shango have no bearing, I think it deserves as much posting as anything else.

Check every detail. Check it twice.

I came back to this post because I totally agree with Sleuth said.  We all have different beliefs in what might have happened.  It is always good to discuss different avenues.  We can't be one sided in our way of thinking especially with all the lies that were fed to us regarding this case.  When I see someone come on and they are in disagreement with that person because it doesn't go with their way of thinking of what happened I say this "too bad" and scroll past the post.  We all have the right to express our opinions in what could have happened.  We are all here for the same reason and that is to find out what happened and who was involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 14, 2006, 09:34:35 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi San, good morning.

Good morning Lala's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 14, 2006, 09:36:52 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I know most people here think Shango/Simian is a bunch of crap...so be it.  I am just tired of arguing the point any longer...either you believe or not.  I don't care any longer...I should not have to defend my thoughts about Shango everytime I am here...just scroll on by if you don't want to read it...

Now, I am getting upset because I am tired so I will hug Nemo and call it a night.  I am tired of getting razzed about Simian and Shango.   :roll:


I hope I didn't upset you, Lalas, but I didn't mention S or S.  Imagine how I feel with the rare opinion the LVR had little or nothing to do with anything for that is just the same as heresy to say here so I do understand not wanting to defend every post.

And its not worth getting upset over because none of us knows what happened for a fact.  If we did, we wouldn't still be all speculating.  But I do think we take too much at face value some of the things we were told early on and the LVR stuff just reeks of a Julia inspired decoy to me.

That is just ME and you are entitled to think and Shango all you want and I hope you will.  Next time, I will just stay out of it.

Good night, all.

.


Well, seems I missed some of the action last night.  Seems there's reason to believe that Shango and Simian both has some inside info, but if they had evidence or hard facts, why the riddles?  My take on Shango is that he's telling us there's lots of nasty people doing nasty things on One Nasty Island and that's the reason for the coverup.  I think if Lorenzo van Rijn is involved in Natalee's disappearance, it's because that's who sells the XTC to the island predators.   KISS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 14, 2006, 09:37:53 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys...I have had sleep and now I am better.  Coffee anyone?  :D

BTW does anyone have a street map of Aruba?


I don't have a map, but found a site that has some available, but only major streets are noted.  IIRC, you are looking for one for Oranjestad & south.   Odd that this site lists Oranjestad area but no longer offers a link...mmmm

http://www.arubatravelinfo.com/map_3.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 09:38:34 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'm lurking prior to going to class but I'm really shocked by this.  If it's the screen capture I'm thinking it is, I was unable to reproduce it which makes me go hmmmmm.

Klaas, what do you mean by *unable to reproduce*.

I am fairly certain the picture they are referring to is a screen capture of the white bag in the pond from the aru-bay videos.  The screen capture that BLONDE has is the only one I've seen the appears to have a face that looks like Natalee.  I did everything I could to attempt to reproduce it and couldn't.  Just saying I find it odd I couldn't reproduce it but maybe Blonde has some "special" technique.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 14, 2006, 09:40:41 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Morn LilPuma

I had the same questions as you. What ever happened to Papa Ramirez owning the Internet Cafe?

MF and Koch have me dizzy with the spinning.


I seem to recall that Nadira lost her job shortly after the boys were arrested and their HI story fell apart.  I'm wondering if it coincides with Paulus's arrest or the fact that Deepak spilled much of it (not all) to Mickey John and ALE.  Joran said in ACA interview that HE was the first one to tell the truth about the HI story being a lie.  Which means it was probably Deepak.   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 09:43:59 AM
Just posted on the front page comment area of SM:


In the November 20th 2006 National Enquirer. There is a story entitled “Coverup in Aruba” It talks about the Dutch going to Aruba. And Not talking to anyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 09:48:04 AM
WARNING - GOING TO SWITCH THREADS IN A MINUTE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 14, 2006, 09:48:11 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted on the front page comment area of SM:


In the November 20th 2006 National Enquirer. There is a story entitled “Coverup in Aruba” It talks about the Dutch going to Aruba. And Not talking to anyone.

The Dutch not talking to anyone on Aruba? That could be good or bad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 14, 2006, 09:48:16 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Maybe the knowledge that a work permit can be refused by the Aruban court using nutty reasoning,  explains the Kalpoe's subservience to the "judge's son" and the all powerful Judge (lol) van der Sloot and their silence.    It sounds as if an appeal would be pointless and financially impossible.   Now Nadira has 2 sons to support.  What will Deepak do -work in construction?  He hasn't got the physical ability.  Work at a hotel?Doubtful anyone would want his recognizable face around.  If he still owns a car he might consider becoming a taxi driver.  It seems that this action by the Aruban court might prompt silent Deepak to start SINGING.
Let's hope that the Kalpoe brothers can sing in perfect harmony.
P.S.  Don't they have any photocopiers in Aruba?

This will be Deepak in 40 years.
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/ShoeShine.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 09:49:20 AM
Anna had some very valid points last night.  She's right, maybe we do put too much stock into trivial things and as some say it was a simple crime.  But for the life of me I can not understand why if it is so simple things are now so complicated.  Why does one single family, the Sloots, weild so much influence over an island.  If it were only the Kalpoes, they would be in jail right now and we all know that.  Look at what they tried to do to the security guards.  

It was the 3 perps testimony that got the SG arrested in the first place.  A bold faced lie put two people behind bars.  I remember thinking at the time, well they got the people responsible for that crime, it won't be long until they find her body and she can be brought home.  That is what should have happened.  

So why didn't it?  Because whatever happened was more than just a teenage bunch of pimps on a sexcapade spree.  Otherwise, why disappear the body?  It's the "doesn't make sense" aspect that keeps me coming back to the riddles and secrets.  

Now, let's explore the Shango/Simian connection...there may be absolutely no connection.  If you never read them...how do you know for certain?  I have said this many times, I wish they had the courage to come out and tell us the truth.  The purpose of the riddles and secrets and allusions to shady, underbelly, dealings going on in Aruba.  They didn't.  

Maybe the reason is because these same people that posted as Simian and Shango were also caught up in the middle of the coverup and knew there was no way out.  So they told their stories and then went on to post under other names.  I firmly believe that whoever they are, they still read here and still post somewhere under other names.  

Next topic, please.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 09:49:30 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
WARNING - GOING TO SWITCH THREADS IN A MINUTE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 14, 2006, 09:51:00 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys...I have had sleep and now I am better.  Coffee anyone?  :D

BTW does anyone have a street map of Aruba?


I don't have a map, but found a site that has some available, but only major streets are noted.  IIRC, you are looking for one for Oranjestad & south.   Odd that this site lists Oranjestad area but no longer offers a link...mmmm

http://www.arubatravelinfo.com/map_3.html


I am looking for a particular address location.  I thought at one time we had some type of street map that shows the names of various streets, not just the ones in Oranjestad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 14, 2006, 09:51:18 AM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 543

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=540

Sorry, had to do this so Red wouldn't have to  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #542 11/11 - 11/14/2006
Post by: San on November 14, 2006, 09:51:28 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted on the front page comment area of SM:


In the November 20th 2006 National Enquirer. There is a story entitled “Coverup in Aruba” It talks about the Dutch going to Aruba. And Not talking to anyone.

Why am I not surprised.  So they went there to read over documents.  They could have done the same thing in the Netherlands.