Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: San on August 25, 2007, 04:34:53 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: San on August 25, 2007, 04:34:53 PM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/11cmcopy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/25 - 8/27/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 01:54:05 PM
Cool.....ty.

http://tinyurl.com/2run6u

Modernization plans for Aruba cruise harbor

The Prime Minister of Aruba, Mr. Nelson Oduber announced that in the location of the current container harbor, which will move to Barcadera, a modern and luxurious cruise terminal would be built to accommodate the extensive market of the cruise industry.

The Minister of Tourism and Transportation, Mr. Edison Briesen recently announced that efforts would be directed to Oranjestad wharf in working to attract greater cruise tourism to the island.

The Government of Aruba commissioned ALATEC, a Spanish company to complete a study and to come with a design which includes ideas of moving the cargo area to Barcadera and to evaluate the opportunities of transforming the former cargo area into an area for condominiums and mega yachts.

Another project is to create a plan for the wharf area with ideas encompassing new look for the wharf in regard to its architectural style. Minister Briesen is very optimistic to start with the projects by the end of this year, beginning of next year. The plans should be presented by November this year to Minister Briesen by Alatec, which in turn will present it to the Council of Ministers for a final decision.

Prime Minister Oduber added that the move is a political one with the economic feasibility in mind.

With this move the Government of Aruba hopes to boost the cruise tourism to Aruba even more.

http://www.admiralshipping.com/aruba.html#port2

Barcadera
Position:
Position: 12 29.0’ North / 070 01.0 West
Industrial harbour Located at 3 miles South East of Oranjestad.

Overview:
Primarily Aggregate, Cement, Ro-Ro, some Petroleum products and Propane. There is one berth 1,200 ft in length and the port has a maximum draft of 32 ft. Bunkers are available by barge and tank truck. Fresh water is also available ex-pipe. This port is also used for vessel conducting minor repairs.

Tidal range and flow: 0.4 M
Navigation aids: BA Charts 702 & 1412
Contact methods: Oranjestad Port Authority: VHF 16 and 11

Restrictions: Max LOA of vessels 230 M
Width of entrance to harbour 143.3 M(Turning basin) Depth 10.97 M

Berths:
1 x 1,200 Ft. Max Draught 31' Max Width 305 M

General Information:

Ballast
No facilities available to receive dirty ballast. Vessels are to arrive with sufficient ballast to permit safe handling

Waste Oil Disposal
Services for the Removal of engine/bilge oil can be provided via tanker trucks

Garbage
Collection service available

Freshwater
Drinkingwater from the purest Quality is supplied ex-pipe at a rate of about

20 to 30 Tonnes per hour

Bunkers:
Various Grades of Bunkers are available and can be supplied via bunkerbarge
In agreement with Vl Fuels and Marketing.

>> view map




 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Red on August 26, 2007, 02:48:32 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 26, 2007, 02:57:33 PM
willing to do anything we can!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 02:58:05 PM
Thanks, Red!

Sure!  Anything we can do, I am sure we would all be more than grateful for the opportunity to help in any way!

Please keep us posted.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 26, 2007, 02:58:35 PM
willing to do anything we can!!

Me too!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 03:02:32 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.


Thanks Red - it will be great to hear from Paul Reynolds!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 03:13:13 PM
Thanks, Red!

Sure!  Anything we can do, I am sure we would all be more than grateful for the opportunity to help in any way!

Please keep us posted.



Yes indeed! Please do!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2007, 03:14:45 PM
TY Klaas!

One possibility just occured to me. What poster do we know who is Dutch...and likes to delete?  :silent:

Lazlo?  The only other person I can think of is Reality but he's not Dutch.



I believe if codebreaker’s words are credible and she/he is privy to the event that encompass the disappearance of an eighteen year old American citizen … for sake of justice for Natalee Holloway and … a measure of closure for her family … she/he should be informing the FBI … the family’s legal representation … not posting on internet forum.

However … I do not believe for one minute that codebreaker is Lazlo.  Lazlo’s theory distances Joran from implication … undermines the motives of an anquished mother … implicates the Mountain Brook students and … implies that Natalee was ultimately responsible for her own demise.  Lazlo’s  theory is reminiscent of Julia Renfro and Angela's article/video ... "The Other Side of the Holloway Case".

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1290.msg192139;topicseen#msg192139

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

REFUGEES UNLEASHED

Re: Theories on the Natalee Holloway case?
Lazlo Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 1:10 pm
Could this be what happened to Natalee?

http://p073.ezboard.com/ftheunusualsuspectsfrm7.showMessageRange?topicID=1277.topic&start=41&stop=60


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 03:32:17 PM
Nuts4,

So this massive cruise ship dock could also be a part of the debt incurred by the government of Aruba in their unrelenting support of and involvement with the tourism industry!

I doubt they had this kind of money just sitting around and would just betcha they borrowed it and now have payments to make to pay it back.

All reasons why they just can't have a tourist girl vanish at the hands of locals.

Just my opinion but I do think this is why the Aruban government supported the cover up of what happened to Natalee.

More and more we see the government go into debt for tourism.  No wonder they can't have anything happen to it as their primary source of income and with all this money to repay.

Something to think about in regard to their lack of initiative in this botched investigation and cover up.  I think it is called a MOTIVE.

.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 26, 2007, 03:39:36 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.


  TY .. and hope folks are able to help ou any way they can.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 26, 2007, 03:57:29 PM
    I certainly hope this massive Cruise Ship Dock .......doesn't begin construction, or any "pre"construction activities before Tim and TES get down there! :shock:

    Nobody wants to believe that Reality is from South Africa??  And Dutch? :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 04:01:28 PM
Yes, it would be great to actually DO something to help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 04:06:10 PM
Codebreaker says>>  after midnight they
got to Container Harbour, they were at berth #5, this is were they unload
containers import,export all weekdays, they are left open on weekends. so
they can park mega cruise ships if needed, it's 820 ft. long, water is 32 to
36ft. deep, her hands were put into 2.5gal. her head also was put into a 2.5
gal. bucket  the hands were dropped at center of this dock by marker#5.
they travel north est. 200ft.then dropped her head and still went north
and dropped her body #45 buoy or marker, this is a channel and protected
from waves, they could have used a small boat?? oars or ele. motor, very quite..
Beto works part time for Caribbean overseas, very familiar with area.
koen,sander have boating experience.
I hope no one gets offended
                                                    codebreaker
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Caribbean Overseas Ltd.
(Distributor) 
 
Caribbean Overseas Ltd.
Schotlandstraat 47
Oranjestad,
Tel: 297-821064
Fax: 297-828213 
   
 
Major Aruban company that recently purchased the Lee Thai trading company. Supplies all supermarkets in the region. Exclusive distributor for Hormel products in Aruba. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tylergal on August 26, 2007, 04:06:22 PM
But Anna is right, the Dutch were the colonizers and now that apartheid is no longer the case, there is an apartheid of another sort and it is all horrible for the residents and especially for those whose land is being taken from them only to be squandered by those who only want power and control, nothing for the citizenry, be they black or white.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 04:11:22 PM
    I certainly hope this massive Cruise Ship Dock .......doesn't begin construction, or any "pre"construction activities before Tim and TES get down there! :shock:

    Nobody wants to believe that Reality is from South Africa??  And Dutch? :smt102


Reality
Guest
  Re: John Q. Kelly, Carlos & Charlie's, and the Big Lie in This Case
« Reply #128 on: December 31, 2005, 12:33:08 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Durban is my home town, born and bred, lived there for 42 years of my 49.

Now for some facts !

The Dutch were not the architects of Apartheid.
The Indian population, who live mostly in and around Durban are certainly not substantial in terms of numbers.
The Netherlands were at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement over a very long period.
Apartheid was legislated in law in SA.
The racism practiced in the south of the US makes racism in SA look like a Sunday school picnic because it is not legislated but practiced voluntarily and in disguise.
The US and other Western countries used the Sa regime to further their interests in Africa.
 
 Report to moderator    Logged
 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 26, 2007, 04:12:00 PM
Anna wrote:
Yes, South Africa was originally settled by the Dutch.  Afrikaners are Dutch.  It was only much later the British took it over via Boer Wars, wasn't it?

But the apartheid system of segregation was put in place by the oh so tolerant Dutch.  HA!  That system received universal global condemnation and as such was finally abandoned in fairly recent years.

But the Dutch were the main white settlers of that region historically.  Many have left in recent years of chaos on the entire continent and we even have a few families in this region who have relocated from South Africa to this country.
~~~~

Anna, would this be from where I heard the term "Black Dutch"?TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2007, 04:15:06 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.

Hi Monkeys
Yes!
I'm sure all of us will help in any way we can.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 04:16:33 PM
GEL,

I don't really know.  There are of course black people who are Dutch by nationality but it might be like the term Black Irish which only means a regular Irishman with dark features.

And the Pennsylvania Dutch are really German, gets confusing.

But I am not familiar with the term Black Dutch and so don't know.  Rammstein might.  We can ask him when he is on some time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 04:22:12 PM
    I certainly hope this massive Cruise Ship Dock .......doesn't begin construction, or any "pre"construction activities before Tim and TES get down there! :shock:

    Nobody wants to believe that Reality is from South Africa??  And Dutch? :smt102


Reality
Guest
  Re: John Q. Kelly, Carlos & Charlie's, and the Big Lie in This Case
« Reply #128 on: December 31, 2005, 12:33:08 PM »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Durban is my home town, born and bred, lived there for 42 years of my 49.

Now for some facts !

The Dutch were not the architects of Apartheid.
The Indian population, who live mostly in and around Durban are certainly not substantial in terms of numbers.
The Netherlands were at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement over a very long period.
Apartheid was legislated in law in SA.
The racism practiced in the south of the US makes racism in SA look like a Sunday school picnic because it is not legislated but practiced voluntarily and in disguise.
The US and other Western countries used the Sa regime to further their interests in Africa.
 
 Report to moderator    Logged
 




Reality does have that fixation with Americans and particulary the South.  Sounds much like the fake conversations reported by Joran as though Natalee lived a couple of hundred years ago.

Now Reality is an expert on the South as well.  Seems sort of a pattern.

I wonder if these kind of people know that blacks have been returning to Alabama in very high numbers since the 1970's and that far more move here than move away.  Strange thing for them to do if this claim of his were true.

But as a current resident of South Africa, would he not have a South African passport and prior to that, it was a British colony since it was a Dutch one I do believe.  Independent now, however.

Does anyone else recall it this way?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 26, 2007, 04:23:12 PM
Where did this "code talker" stuff come from?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 26, 2007, 04:28:30 PM
From BFN.. Codetalker is a " new ' poster and this stuff just started over there
within the last day or two. Don't know what to make of it. I think I am going to go there now, see if I can grab those posts . Klaasend grabbed them up and they are in the last thread,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 04:28:44 PM
TY Klaas!

One possibility just occured to me. What poster do we know who is Dutch...and likes to delete?  :silent:

Lazlo?  The only other person I can think of is Reality but he's not Dutch.



I believe if codebreaker’s words are credible and she/he is privy to the event that encompass the disappearance of an eighteen year old American citizen … for sake of justice for Natalee Holloway and … a measure of closure for her family … she/he should be informing the FBI … the family’s legal representation … not posting on internet forum.

However … I do not believe for one minute that codebreaker is Lazlo.  Lazlo’s theory distances Joran from implication … undermines the motives of an anquished mother … implicates the Mountain Brook students and … implies that Natalee was ultimately responsible for her own demise.  Lazlo’s  theory is reminiscent of Julia Renfro and Angela's article/video ... "The Other Side of the Holloway Case".

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1290.msg192139;topicseen#msg192139

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

REFUGEES UNLEASHED

Re: Theories on the Natalee Holloway case?
Lazlo Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 1:10 pm
Could this be what happened to Natalee?

http://p073.ezboard.com/ftheunusualsuspectsfrm7.showMessageRange?topicID=1277.topic&start=41&stop=60


Hi Janet - we were talking about a different poste (don't remember the name right now) that posted one post at Scrux to the attention of Jonathan45 then deleted his post.  We weren't talking about the Codebreaker person posting at BFN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 26, 2007, 04:36:20 PM
Polemic was the poster....spent some time looking up the definition and searching when discussed earlier.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 26, 2007, 04:37:55 PM
GEL,

I don't really know.  There are of course black people who are Dutch by nationality but it might be like the term Black Irish which only means a regular Irishman with dark features.

And the Pennsylvania Dutch are really German, gets confusing.

But I am not familiar with the term Black Dutch and so don't know.  Rammstein might.  We can ask him when he is on some time.

Thanks Anna..the reason I'd asked is I'm suppose to have "Black Dutch" on my Grandmothers' side of the family. This geneology stuff has never been my "bag" before. I should've looked into this kinda stuff long ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 04:38:00 PM
Inside South Africa: Brief history of Durban

Read traveler reviews on all South Africa Attractions

Very little is known about the first residents of the area around Durban as there is no written history of the area before it was “discovered” by the Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama in 1497. Da Gama called the bay Natal, the Portuguese word for Christmas, as he landed on Christmas day.
 
Very little activity took place in Durban until 1842 when the British Lieutenant F. G. Farewell arrived from the Cape Colony with a group of men and established a small settlement. The adverturer Henry Fynn accompanied Farewell and famously befirended Shaka, King of the Zulus by helping him to recover from a battle wound. Shake gave Flynn a 25-mile piece of the coastline in thanks. In 1835, it was decided to build a capital which was named "Durban" after the Cape Governor Sir Benjamin D’Urban.

The Afrikaans Voortrekers who had traveled eastwards from the Cape established the republic of Natalia in 1838 making the town of Pietermaritzburg the capital. The Voortrekkers had many conflicts with the Zulus and British settlers before being forced to accept British rule in 1844.
A sugar cane industry was established in Durban with the Brtish importing thousands of indentured labourers from India to work in the fields. This has today resulted in Durban having a large Indian community.

----------

So the Dutch and British used to fight over the region and guess a person from there could be of either Dutch or British descent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 04:40:00 PM
Polemic was the poster....spent some time looking up the definition and searching when discussed earlier.

Thanks 2NJ - yes, Polemic, I had just gotten back from the grocery store and was too lazy to search back.  Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 04:41:05 PM
From BFN.. Codetalker is a " new ' poster and this stuff just started over there
within the last day or two. Don't know what to make of it. I think I am going to go there now, see if I can grab those posts . Klaasend grabbed them up and they are in the last thread,


I don't know what to make of this either.  Interesting to say the least but where has this person been for over two years?

Am curious to see if he/she posts more and contacts the family, etc.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 04:42:28 PM
GEL,

I don't really know.  There are of course black people who are Dutch by nationality but it might be like the term Black Irish which only means a regular Irishman with dark features.

And the Pennsylvania Dutch are really German, gets confusing.

But I am not familiar with the term Black Dutch and so don't know.  Rammstein might.  We can ask him when he is on some time.

Thanks Anna..the reason I'd asked is I'm suppose to have "Black Dutch" on my Grandmothers' side of the family. This geneology stuff has never been my "bag" before. I should've looked into this kinda stuff long ago.

Back in the very early 70's I worked with a man that called himself "black Dutch". 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Dutch


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2007, 04:49:27 PM
TY Klaas!

One possibility just occured to me. What poster do we know who is Dutch...and likes to delete?  :silent:

Lazlo?  The only other person I can think of is Reality but he's not Dutch.



I believe if codebreaker’s words are credible and she/he is privy to the event that encompass the disappearance of an eighteen year old American citizen … for sake of justice for Natalee Holloway and … a measure of closure for her family … she/he should be informing the FBI … the family’s legal representation … not posting on internet forum.

However … I do not believe for one minute that codebreaker is Lazlo.  Lazlo’s theory distances Joran from implication … undermines the motives of an anquished mother … implicates the Mountain Brook students and … implies that Natalee was ultimately responsible for her own demise.  Lazlo’s  theory is reminiscent of Julia Renfro and Angela's article/video ... "The Other Side of the Holloway Case".

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1290.msg192139;topicseen#msg192139

Janet

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

REFUGEES UNLEASHED

Re: Theories on the Natalee Holloway case?
Lazlo Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 1:10 pm
Could this be what happened to Natalee?

http://p073.ezboard.com/ftheunusualsuspectsfrm7.showMessageRange?topicID=1277.topic&start=41&stop=60


Hi Janet - we were talking about a different poste (don't remember the name right now) that posted one post at Scrux to the attention of Jonathan45 then deleted his post.  We weren't talking about the Codebreaker person posting at BFN.

LOL  Story of my life ...

Nevertheless ... I still stand by my position regarding those who anonymously post as if they are privy to the truth ... the truth that can expose those who participated in events of the fateful morning of May 30, 2005 ... the truth regarding those who were involved in the coverup but ... fail to take the necessary steps that can blow this case wide open.  Logic dictates if these posters are credible but refuse to come forward ... they are contributing to the roller coaster ride from H---  that the family has been forced to endure for the past 2 1/2 years.

Janet

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2007, 04:55:49 PM
OOPS!!!

My post went throught twice.

Klaas ... could you please delete one of them.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 26, 2007, 05:00:54 PM
I had family that lived in S.Africa for a decade. Most of the whites are Afrikaners who speak a dutch dialect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaners


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 26, 2007, 05:13:53 PM
Post #18

++++++++++++



This story is that Nadira was fired for fraud and they tried to blame her firing on Natalee Holloway’s case.

ORANJESTAD—- “The firing of Nadira Ramirez, the mother of Statish [sic] and Deepak Kalpoe, has nothing to do with the Holloway-case or the fact that she is the mother of the brothers Kalpoe”, so explains Ike Cohen, director of the Manchebo Hotel.

Hereby Cohen reacts to the expressions of Ramirez in a morning newspaper that says that her firing relates to the Holloway-case. Cohen: “We have given Mrs. Ramirez the reasons for the firings, both verbally and in writing It is not up to us make the reasons for this firing public, since we are of the opinion that it would violate the privacy of Mrs. Ramirez.

The alleged reason that Ramirez was fired would have been fraud. After being off from her work on Monday and Tuesday because of the freeing of her sons Ramirez appeared Wednesday again at her work in the Steakhouse of Manchebo. She was called to the Management, her thinking was that she would have been congratulated. This was not the case. In presence of her highest boss Cohen was she told that she was fired. The alleged fraud would have been committed when she cancelled orders that the clients ate or drank, thus Ramirez would have allegedly put the money in her own pocket. Ramirez denies to have committed fraud and is thinking of fighting her ficanceledring. Ramirez worked nine years in the Steakhouse at Manchebo.

http://tinyurl.com/2fbhct


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 26, 2007, 05:18:53 PM
" like the term Black Irish which only means a regular Irishman with dark features"
Black Irish is a term used for the dark featured Irish people, yes, but the meaning is of one who is decended from the Spanish sailors who came to Ireland and left behind "presents "  for the girls nine months later. Or they could have married them.
I've never heard it used in a nice way, in fact when I've heard it is was quite an insult. Low born, born on the wrong side of the blanket, not pure Celt  etc


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on August 26, 2007, 05:19:54 PM
http://tinyurl.com/ys8dem

andrea j.
Monday, July 18th, 2005, 08:10 PM
Hey all
I was distressed to learn that Mrs. Kalpoe Ramirez was "fired" from the French Steakhouse.
I wrote to the owner.
Here is the response.
I have no comment
other than to say....too much of a coincidence IMO.


Dear Andrea,
Further to your email of July 09, 2005 we would like to advise you of the following.

News stories were released in the local press on July 08, 2005 in reference to the dismissal at Manchebo Beach Hotel of Mrs. Ramirez and the reasons apparently given by Mrs. Ramirez. We would like to advise you that those reasons for dismissal given by Mrs. Ramirez were incorrect. We would like to let you know that the dismissal of Mrs. Ramirez has nothing to do with the fact that she is the mother of the Kalpoe brothers, who could have been involved with the Natalee Holloway case. We did advise Mrs. Ramirez the reasons of her dismissal both verbally as well as in writing. It is however not up to us to make these reasons publicly known as it is our opinion that this would hinder the right of privacy of Mrs. Ramirez.

We very much appreciate and understand your concerns and would like to let you know that the Aruba law does not allow employers to dismiss an employee from work without an urgent reason. Again, we would like to repeat that the reason for the dismissal of Mrs. Ramirez has absolutely nothing to do with the Natalee Holloway case.

We understand your concern and hope to welcome you again at the French Steakhouse on your return visit to our island.



Cordially,

Ike Cohen

Owner

Edgar Roelofs

Director of Operations


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 26, 2007, 05:23:14 PM
GEL,

I don't really know.  There are of course black people who are Dutch by nationality but it might be like the term Black Irish which only means a regular Irishman with dark features.

And the Pennsylvania Dutch are really German, gets confusing.

But I am not familiar with the term Black Dutch and so don't know.  Rammstein might.  We can ask him when he is on some time.

Thanks Anna..the reason I'd asked is I'm suppose to have "Black Dutch" on my Grandmothers' side of the family. This geneology stuff has never been my "bag" before. I should've looked into this kinda stuff long ago.

Back in the very early 70's I worked with a man that called himself "black Dutch". 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Dutch

Thanks, Klass. Interesting!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 05:27:01 PM
I have only heard people apply the term to themselves as being part Black Irish.  I know there was once a political party Black and Tans or something like that, maybe a revolutionary group but also think they figured in as some point with some.

Not sure what it means exactly nor Black Dutch but it may well refer to dark features as you say, not the typical redheaded, fair skinned coloration of the Irish.  Could be the same for the Dutch as well.

Over the years, these things have a way of taking on a life of their own.

And I was shocked!  Shocked I tell ya when that software OSPainter posted yesterday took my ancestors right back to New York!  Yankees!!!  But maybe neighbors of San's ancestors, too, so that part is OK.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2007, 05:43:44 PM
http://tinyurl.com/ys8dem

andrea j.
Monday, July 18th, 2005, 08:10 PM
Hey all
I was distressed to learn that Mrs. Kalpoe Ramirez was "fired" from the French Steakhouse.
I wrote to the owner.
Here is the response.
I have no comment
other than to say....too much of a coincidence IMO.


Dear Andrea,
Further to your email of July 09, 2005 we would like to advise you of the following.

News stories were released in the local press on July 08, 2005 in reference to the dismissal at Manchebo Beach Hotel of Mrs. Ramirez and the reasons apparently given by Mrs. Ramirez. We would like to advise you that those reasons for dismissal given by Mrs. Ramirez were incorrect. We would like to let you know that the dismissal of Mrs. Ramirez has nothing to do with the fact that she is the mother of the Kalpoe brothers, who could have been involved with the Natalee Holloway case. We did advise Mrs. Ramirez the reasons of her dismissal both verbally as well as in writing. It is however not up to us to make these reasons publicly known as it is our opinion that this would hinder the right of privacy of Mrs. Ramirez.

We very much appreciate and understand your concerns and would like to let you know that the Aruba law does not allow employers to dismiss an employee from work without an urgent reason. Again, we would like to repeat that the reason for the dismissal of Mrs. Ramirez has absolutely nothing to do with the Natalee Holloway case.

We understand your concern and hope to welcome you again at the French Steakhouse on your return visit to our island.



Cordially,

Ike Cohen

Owner

Edgar Roelofs

Director of Operations
Nadira worked at the steak house for 9 years,so it's safe to assume she has been on aruba for at least 9 years.I don't think Satish and Deepak have been there for 9 years also have they?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 05:54:41 PM
Klaas....do you have time to take one of the 'route maps' that you have done and change it to the way codebreaker says things happened so we can get a visual??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 05:58:20 PM
port map


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 06:17:25 PM
Klaas....do you have time to take one of the 'route maps' that you have done and change it to the way codebreaker says things happened so we can get a visual??

Let me see what I can do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 07:03:18 PM
Klaas....do you have time to take one of the 'route maps' that you have done and change it to the way codebreaker says things happened so we can get a visual??

Let me see what I can do.


Thanks Klaas.
Anyone know who this site belongs to?
http://ashvickers.tripod.com/id10.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 08:09:15 PM
Klaas....do you have time to take one of the 'route maps' that you have done and change it to the way codebreaker says things happened so we can get a visual??

Let me see what I can do.


Thanks Klaas.
Anyone know who this site belongs to?
http://ashvickers.tripod.com/id10.html

Do we know where Flor's house is?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:16:19 PM
Klaas....do you have time to take one of the 'route maps' that you have done and change it to the way codebreaker says things happened so we can get a visual??

Let me see what I can do.


Thanks Klaas.
Anyone know who this site belongs to?
http://ashvickers.tripod.com/id10.html

Do we know where Flor's house is?


o crap.....I don't


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:22:18 PM
 lives behind "Codemsa".  ??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:23:26 PM
lives behind "Codemsa".  ??


ummmmmmm...it is a hardware store...brb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:24:39 PM
lives behind "Codemsa".  ??


ummmmmmm...it is a hardware store...brb


Cumana 69, aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 08:29:51 PM
lives behind "Codemsa".  ??


ummmmmmm...it is a hardware store...brb


Cumana 69, aruba

Ok, I'll see if I can find Cumana on my map.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:30:03 PM
I can't find a map


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 26, 2007, 08:32:09 PM
I have only heard people apply the term to themselves as being part Black Irish.  I know there was once a political party Black and Tans or something like that, maybe a revolutionary group but also think they figured in as some point with some.

Not sure what it means exactly nor Black Dutch but it may well refer to dark features as you say, not the typical redheaded, fair skinned coloration of the Irish.  Could be the same for the Dutch as well.

Over the years, these things have a way of taking on a life of their own.

And I was shocked!  Shocked I tell ya when that software OSPainter posted yesterday took my ancestors right back to New York!  Yankees!!!  But maybe neighbors of San's ancestors, too, so that part is OK.

Irish History Lesson :

Black and Tans were an official group recruited by the English to fight against the IRA and rebels in Ireland during the home rule upheavals around 1915-1920s.
I have never heard the term Black Irish and there is no one left of my ancestors to ask about it.  I know the very original inhabitants of Ireland were a smaller darker complexioned race and the red haired fair complexion of the now typical Irish and Scots came from their invasions by the Vikings.  I can trace my ancestors in Scotland well back before the days of Mary 1 (Bloody Mary) when they were exiled to Northern Ireland for opposing her Catholic rule.

More on the Black and Tans :

www.historylearningsite.co.uk/black_and_tans.htm

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:44:19 PM
Does this help???
http://wikimapia.org/3838263/codemsa_hardware_store


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 08:45:32 PM
lives behind "Codemsa".  ??


ummmmmmm...it is a hardware store...brb


Cumana 69, aruba

Ok, I'll see if I can find Cumana on my map.

I believe it's in Oranjestad but I can't find it. 

http://www.caribbean-on-line.com/islands/ar/ormap.shtml


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 08:49:25 PM
Does this help???
http://wikimapia.org/3838263/codemsa_hardware_store

Yes but it means I'll have to do 2 maps.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 08:54:08 PM
Does this help???
http://wikimapia.org/3838263/codemsa_hardware_store

Yes but it means I'll have to do 2 maps.  :lol:
o lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 26, 2007, 08:55:11 PM
I have only heard people apply the term to themselves as being part Black Irish.  I know there was once a political party Black and Tans or something like that, maybe a revolutionary group but also think they figured in as some point with some.

Not sure what it means exactly nor Black Dutch but it may well refer to dark features as you say, not the typical redheaded, fair skinned coloration of the Irish.  Could be the same for the Dutch as well.

Over the years, these things have a way of taking on a life of their own.

And I was shocked!  Shocked I tell ya when that software OSPainter posted yesterday took my ancestors right back to New York!  Yankees!!!  But maybe neighbors of San's ancestors, too, so that part is OK.

Irish History Lesson :

Black and Tans were an official group recruited by the English to fight against the IRA and rebels in Ireland during the home rule upheavals around 1915-1920s.
I have never heard the term Black Irish and there is no one left of my ancestors to ask about it.  I know the very original inhabitants of Ireland were a smaller darker complexioned race and the red haired fair complexion of the now typical Irish and Scots came from their invasions by the Vikings.  I can trace my ancestors in Scotland well back before the days of Mary 1 (Bloody Mary) when they were exiled to Northern Ireland for opposing her Catholic rule.

More on the Black and Tans :

www.historylearningsite.co.uk/black_and_tans.htm

.
Calling someone " Black Irish " is an insult in these parts.
I've heard it used in the derogatory fashion. ( One family member to another ! ) I did look it up and there are several meanings, and mine was one of them. Friend of mine from Ireland knew the expression and the meaning was the same to him. Cultural thing, I don' t know.  But I digress !  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2007, 09:04:43 PM
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-black-irish.htm

What is Black Irish?

The term Black Irish is used in the United States, Great Britain, Australia, and Canada to describe individuals of Irish ancestry who have features which are darker than traditional Irish features. Traditional Irish features include blue or green eyes, fair hair, and pale skin. Irish individuals with dark hair and eyes are often referred to as Black Irish and are understood to have Iberian ancestors.

Many people believe that the dark features evident in the Black Irish come from a dramatic event that occurred over 400 years ago. In 1588, over 20 ships carrying members of the Spanish Armada wrecked on the coast of Ireland. Many of the men were killed in the wrecks. The survivors, however, were of great concern to England which was then under the rule of Queen Elizabeth I. The stranded men were put to death by Irish soldiers and, save the handful of men who fled to Scotland, it is unlikely that any of them ever made it past the beaches of Ireland.

Therefore, it is unlikely that members of the Spanish Armada could have made a strong enough genetic contribution to the people of Ireland giving rise to the Black Irish. It is more likely that a group of Spanish soldiers serving under Irish chiefs around the same time stayed in the country long enough to father children. Others believe that the Black Irish are descendants of a people from the Iberian peninsula who migrated to both Ireland and Britain over 2500 years ago. Recent genetic research has supported this claim.

Black Irish comes from social and political biases as well as genetic history. In the 1800s, many Caucasian people believed that the Irish were somehow related to Africans. Africans and individuals of very dark features were held in distaste and considered to be inferior peoples. Therefore, the term Black Irish was born and upheld. In 1862, John Beddoe, an esteemed ethnologist, published Races of Britain in which he described those of Celtic descent as having features similar to those of African descent.

The term Black Scot is also sometimes used to describe a Scottish person with dark features. However, this term is used much less frequently than the term Black Irish. As with many terms relating to race, depending on the descent and sensitivity of the individual to whom you are speaking the term Black Irish can carry a number of different meanings and connotations.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 09:06:06 PM
CODEMSA N.V.
Cumana 69
ORANJESTAD
Tel: (297) 5822235
Fax: (297) 5822295


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 09:10:31 PM
Maybe you could do a Mapquest, LOL!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 09:14:05 PM
Does this help???
http://wikimapia.org/3838263/codemsa_hardware_store

Yes but it means I'll have to do 2 maps.  :lol:
o lol

Not done yet.  This is hard.  Note, Joran's home is actually off the map and so it 2K's and Flor's house.  Flor lives closer to 2K and north of them. :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/Codebreakercopy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 26, 2007, 09:16:20 PM
My mother was fair (milk white complexion), dark haired & brown eyed (Irish/German)....my Dad, fair, blue eyed, toehead to dark (so I'm told, Italian).  They often had discussions when I was young, and Dad would tease Mom asking if she really had a little Spaniard mixed in.  I really know as many Irish with dark hair & eyes as I do blue & blond.  The term Black Irish never came up......I did hear Black Protestant in my youth, but didn't know what it meant until I looked it up today.  Just remembering things heard as a kid....never too late to learn something.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 09:17:25 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 09:20:14 PM
Looks good so far! Thanks! I think I would have to question the part where he goes from the pond to Marriott to wash off blood...if one is bloody near a pond....ummmm DUH...why not wash it off at the pond??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 09:21:38 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

Last time I tried Mapquest didn't work for Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 26, 2007, 09:30:06 PM
CODETALKER'S TIMELINE IS OFF

1:00 per codetalker they left CnC's.

1.15 AM - At approximately 01.15 hours, we walked from Carlos & Charlies to the outside.(Joran 6/9/05 statement)
1:15 AM - we walked with our guest to Deepak’s car. I with my brother in the front of his car. (Satish 5/31/05 statement)

It is 15 minutes from Joran's house to CnC's. (source: Greta interview Part 1)

1:20 per codetalker to drive from CnC's to Salinja Pond and kill Natalee.
1:45 per codetalker to drive from Pond to drop off Joran at home. (25 minutes)

per Joran from his home to beach is 5 MINUTES!

It is 10 to 15 minutes from Kalpoe house to Joran's.

At 2 in the morning, no traffic, it would not take that long.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 26, 2007, 09:31:38 PM
Looks good so far! Thanks! I think I would have to question the part where he goes from the pond to Marriott to wash off blood...if one is bloody near a pond....ummmm DUH...why not wash it off at the pond??

No towels at the pond!

 :smt026


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 26, 2007, 09:37:33 PM
My mother was fair (milk white complexion), dark haired & brown eyed (Irish/German)....my Dad, fair, blue eyed, toehead to dark (so I'm told, Italian).  They often had discussions when I was young, and Dad would tease Mom asking if she really had a little Spaniard mixed in.  I really know as many Irish with dark hair & eyes as I do blue & blond.  The term Black Irish never came up......I did hear Black Protestant in my youth, but didn't know what it meant until I looked it up today.  Just remembering things heard as a kid....never too late to learn something.

Finding the Rainbow connection is important

How green was my mother --- that's another story for another time as Easywriter would say. Heh Heh.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 26, 2007, 09:42:40 PM
My mother was fair (milk white complexion), dark haired & brown eyed (Irish/German)....my Dad, fair, blue eyed, toehead to dark (so I'm told, Italian).  They often had discussions when I was young, and Dad would tease Mom asking if she really had a little Spaniard mixed in.  I really know as many Irish with dark hair & eyes as I do blue & blond.  The term Black Irish never came up......I did hear Black Protestant in my youth, but didn't know what it meant until I looked it up today.  Just remembering things heard as a kid....never too late to learn something.

Finding the Rainbow connection is important

How green was my mother --- that's another story for another time as Easywriter would say. Heh Heh.


my family has a huge Irish hertiage and I have always heard the term black Irish and I still don't know what it means....

what are we talking about though?  I am so lost!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 09:46:49 PM
My mother was fair (milk white complexion), dark haired & brown eyed (Irish/German)....my Dad, fair, blue eyed, toehead to dark (so I'm told, Italian).  They often had discussions when I was young, and Dad would tease Mom asking if she really had a little Spaniard mixed in.  I really know as many Irish with dark hair & eyes as I do blue & blond.  The term Black Irish never came up......I did hear Black Protestant in my youth, but didn't know what it meant until I looked it up today.  Just remembering things heard as a kid....never too late to learn something.

Finding the Rainbow connection is important

How green was my mother --- that's another story for another time as Easywriter would say. Heh Heh.


my family has a huge Irish hertiage and I have always heard the term black Irish and I still don't know what it means....

what are we talking about though?  I am so lost!

It started out being about the case them ballooned after that.  Probably not important anyway. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 09:48:49 PM
Nrs Red,
We were just trying to determine the nationality of one of the posters on another forum, one who seems rather anti-American/Southerner, nic Reality.

He says he lives in S. Africa so could be British or Dutch heritage at work there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 09:50:28 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

I don't know Anna...I kind of got side tracked...ummm...
The prosecutor who resigned early on 'amalin flanegan' and the girl questioned in line #78 here http://tinyurl.com/2bwlkw 'Gilayla Flanegin'
sure makes me go hmmmmmmm...especially now that codebreaker ALSO mentions a girl named Gilayla. This is just all too weird...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 26, 2007, 09:50:42 PM
My mother was fair (milk white complexion), dark haired & brown eyed (Irish/German)....my Dad, fair, blue eyed, toehead to dark (so I'm told, Italian).  They often had discussions when I was young, and Dad would tease Mom asking if she really had a little Spaniard mixed in.  I really know as many Irish with dark hair & eyes as I do blue & blond.  The term Black Irish never came up......I did hear Black Protestant in my youth, but didn't know what it meant until I looked it up today.  Just remembering things heard as a kid....never too late to learn something.

Finding the Rainbow connection is important

How green was my mother --- that's another story for another time as Easywriter would say. Heh Heh.


my family has a huge Irish hertiage and I have always heard the term black Irish and I still don't know what it means....

what are we talking about though?  I am so lost!

I think we're moving toward off-topic....but it started with Black Dutch and evolved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 09:53:06 PM
Looks good so far! Thanks! I think I would have to question the part where he goes from the pond to Marriott to wash off blood...if one is bloody near a pond....ummmm DUH...why not wash it off at the pond??

No towels at the pond!

 :smt026

That's it!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 26, 2007, 09:55:17 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.

Holding my breath one more time, can't wait to hear how I can help out again. Got my Tshirt and pic from TES. Would have rathered them made the search that they'd been promising for over a year.  I'm rairly well off-and this is a cause I'll support to the end.  Apparently I need to scrutinize better. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 26, 2007, 09:57:19 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.

Holding my breath one more time, can't wait to hear how I can help out again. Got my Tshirt and pic from TES. Would have rathered them made the search that they'd been promising for over a year.  I'm rairly well off-and this is a cause I'll support to the end.  Apparently I need to scrutinize better. 

I promise you this does not involve $$$ - and they are STILL planning on the search Indy, but I also cannot divilgue all that I know about what happened and why... it's not off, just postponed....

where is that faith???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 09:57:42 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

I don't know Anna...I kind of got side tracked...ummm...
The prosecutor who resigned early on 'amalin flanegan' and the girl questioned in line #78 here http://tinyurl.com/2bwlkw 'Gilayla Flanegin'
sure makes me go hmmmmmmm...especially now that codebreaker ALSO mentions a girl named Gilayla. This is just all too weird...

One of Joran's friends on his tickle site was Gil. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 26, 2007, 09:59:11 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.

Holding my breath one more time, can't wait to hear how I can help out again. Got my Tshirt and pic from TES. Would have rathered them made the search that they'd been promising for over a year.  I'm rairly well off-and this is a cause I'll support to the end.  Apparently I need to scrutinize better. 

No search isn't worth it, IndyDan, and the search down in the Aruba area will probably be in late November, early December when the hurricane season is over, unless something else happens in the meantime.  We're all better off than those who are missing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 26, 2007, 09:59:25 PM
        Where I come, from NYC Metropolitan Area, Black Irish is not an insult....it is merely used to describe an Irish person with  dark hair and eyes.   Janet is correct, they probably trace back to Spanish or Irish/Spanish ancestry.

       Black Protestant IS an insult!!    Never heard of Black Dutch.  Pa. Dutch = German (Deutch is the word for German in German)

      Lace Curtain Irish IS an insult for Irish....it's like calling them shanty!!!


      As NY was only Irish, Italian, German and Jewish when I was growing up I know these "useless facts" :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 26, 2007, 10:02:49 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

I don't know Anna...I kind of got side tracked...ummm...
The prosecutor who resigned early on 'amalin flanegan' and the girl questioned in line #78 here http://tinyurl.com/2bwlkw 'Gilayla Flanegin'
sure makes me go hmmmmmmm...especially now that codebreaker ALSO mentions a girl named Gilayla. This is just all too weird...

One of Joran's friends on his tickle site was Gil. 

Well, well....on Aruba, you either know everyone or you don't....Nut44X4 chugging right along scooping up all this information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 26, 2007, 10:04:41 PM
Nrs Red,
We were just trying to determine the nationality of one of the posters on another forum, one who seems rather anti-American/Southerner, nic Reality.

He says he lives in S. Africa so could be British or Dutch heritage at work there.




     No, he didn't say he lives there NOW, he lives in London now.  He was born and raised there, but emmigrated,immigrated to England I guess 6 years ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 26, 2007, 10:08:03 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.

Holding my breath one more time, can't wait to hear how I can help out again. Got my Tshirt and pic from TES. Would have rathered them made the search that they'd been promising for over a year.  I'm rairly well off-and this is a cause I'll support to the end.  Apparently I need to scrutinize better. 

No search isn't worth it, IndyDan, and the search down in the Aruba area will probably be in late November, early December when the hurricane season is over, unless something else happens in the meantime.  We're all better off than those who are missing.
This search has been in mix for over a year, I asked TES in 2006/Aug how I could donate to the Natalee relife fund spicifically and got no response. It was after one of Dana's shows when Tim said it was a matter of money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 26, 2007, 10:08:46 PM
    I certainly hope this massive Cruise Ship Dock .......doesn't begin construction, or any "pre"construction activities before Tim and TES get down there! :shock:

    Nobody wants to believe that Reality is from South Africa??  And Dutch? :smt102


Reality
Guest
  Re: John Q. Kelly, Carlos & Charlie's, and the Big Lie in This Case
« Reply #128 on: December 31, 2005, 12:33:08 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Durban is my home town, born and bred, lived there for 42 years of my 49.Now for some facts !

The Dutch were not the architects of Apartheid.
The Indian population, who live mostly in and around Durban are certainly not substantial in terms of numbers.
The Netherlands were at the forefront of the anti-apartheid movement over a very long period.
Apartheid was legislated in law in SA.
The racism practiced in the south of the US makes racism in SA look like a Sunday school picnic because it is not legislated but practiced voluntarily and in disguise.
The US and other Western countries used the Sa regime to further their interests in Africa.
 
 Report to moderator    Logged
 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 10:09:04 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

I don't know Anna...I kind of got side tracked...ummm...
The prosecutor who resigned early on 'amalin flanegan' and the girl questioned in line #78 here http://tinyurl.com/2bwlkw 'Gilayla Flanegin'
sure makes me go hmmmmmmm...especially now that codebreaker ALSO mentions a girl named Gilayla. This is just all too weird...

One of Joran's friends on his tickle site was Gil. 

Maybe Flanegin is a common name in Aruba?  :roll:

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005/11/investigative-team-will-get-new-faces.html

11.14.2005
Investigative team will get new faces
Very dirty handling of the Holloway case in the prosecution’s office

DIARIO Aruba
11/14/2005

ORANJESTAD(AAN): Information DIARIO investigated the whole weekend is what happened with the letter which was sent directly to the attorney general at the Public Ministry by the Holloway and Twitty families to remove those mentioned by name, those in the investigative team orchestrated by the very same Public Ministry.

Dave Holloway, in a secret meeting with prosecutor Flanegin: on the basis of information we have continued to find and search for, about the people in our own Public Ministry, we have been able to uncover that Dave Holloway had a secret meeting with prosecutor Flanegin who apparently got the green light from the attorney general to speak with Dave Holloway in secret.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Auntiem on August 26, 2007, 10:10:50 PM
Now he lives in London.  But I'm sure he speaks Dutch!   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 10:14:27 PM
I think Flanigin might be a common name but is Gilayla?  I never heard it before but maybe it is.

Yes, Nuts4, it is just too intertwined.  Now I wonder if the one who resigned did in fact know something and resigned because she saw there was never any intention to prosecute the guilty because of the massive governement debt that was dependent on tourist income for repayment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 10:17:52 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

I don't know Anna...I kind of got side tracked...ummm...
The prosecutor who resigned early on 'amalin flanegan' and the girl questioned in line #78 here http://tinyurl.com/2bwlkw 'Gilayla Flanegin'
sure makes me go hmmmmmmm...especially now that codebreaker ALSO mentions a girl named Gilayla. This is just all too weird...

One of Joran's friends on his tickle site was Gil. 

http://www.hi5.com/friend/34627871--Gil--Profile-html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 10:21:35 PM
NOPE.....THIS IS HER>>>
http://gilayla.hyves.nl/?&pageid=5CTB9NMF18W84SGKC
Name: Gilayla Flanegin


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 26, 2007, 10:23:50 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 26, 2007, 10:31:18 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.

Holding my breath one more time, can't wait to hear how I can help out again. Got my Tshirt and pic from TES. Would have rathered them made the search that they'd been promising for over a year.  I'm rairly well off-and this is a cause I'll support to the end.  Apparently I need to scrutinize better. 

No search isn't worth it, IndyDan, and the search down in the Aruba area will probably be in late November, early December when the hurricane season is over, unless something else happens in the meantime.  We're all better off than those who are missing.
This search has been in mix for over a year, I asked TES in 2006/Aug how I could donate to the Natalee relife fund spicifically and got no response. It was after one of Dana's shows when Tim said it was a matter of money.

I'm sorry, IndyDan.... I misunderstood your post...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 10:32:47 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


nope.....and we sure have looked, lol....right klaas? lmao.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 10:33:37 PM
I am sort of serious.  What if you put the dock address in as your address and the Hardware store as your destination, would it not do a map and driving directions for you?

I don't know Anna...I kind of got side tracked...ummm...
The prosecutor who resigned early on 'amalin flanegan' and the girl questioned in line #78 here http://tinyurl.com/2bwlkw 'Gilayla Flanegin'
sure makes me go hmmmmmmm...especially now that codebreaker ALSO mentions a girl named Gilayla. This is just all too weird...

One of Joran's friends on his tickle site was Gil. 

http://www.hi5.com/friend/34627871--Gil--Profile-html

That doesn't look like the girl I'm thinking of.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 10:34:42 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


nope.....and we sure have looked, lol....right klaas? lmao.

I haven't had time to look the last few days.  I looked over hundreds of photos though and nothing.  Looked in the Netherlands, Curacao, Bonaire and Aruba.  Nothing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 26, 2007, 10:34:59 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


nope.....and we sure have looked, lol....right klaas? lmao.

I know y'all have been on the case, I was just wondering.... it's *funny* how quiet it has been now that julia et al were told (it's my opinion that they were) to STHU....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2007, 10:36:46 PM
I think Flanigin might be a common name but is Gilayla?  I never heard it before but maybe it is.

Yes, Nuts4, it is just too intertwined.  Now I wonder if the one who resigned did in fact know something and resigned because she saw there was never any intention to prosecute the guilty because of the massive governement debt that was dependent on tourist income for repayment.


Prosecutor........mother perhaps of one Gilayla??
Well...I need to turn in. Goodnight all...tomorrow is another day. We will find the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 26, 2007, 10:42:05 PM
I think Flanigin might be a common name but is Gilayla?  I never heard it before but maybe it is.

Yes, Nuts4, it is just too intertwined.  Now I wonder if the one who resigned did in fact know something and resigned because she saw there was never any intention to prosecute the guilty because of the massive governement debt that was dependent on tourist income for repayment.


Prosecutor........mother perhaps of one Gilayla??
Well...I need to turn in. Goodnight all...tomorrow is another day. We will find the truth.

Good nite!  yes, we will find the truth!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 10:45:10 PM
NOPE.....THIS IS HER>>>
http://gilayla.hyves.nl/?&pageid=5CTB9NMF18W84SGKC
Name: Gilayla Flanegin

Yes, that's her!

Gil - Amanda - Joran, from Joran's Zorpia site:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/GilAmandaJoran.png)

Amanda - Gil - Satish - Joran - Flor, from Joran's Zorpia site:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/AmandaGilFlorSatishJoran.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 10:46:26 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


nope.....and we sure have looked, lol....right klaas? lmao.

I know y'all have been on the case, I was just wondering.... it's *funny* how quiet it has been now that julia et al were told (it's my opinion that they were) to STHU....

Mrs. Red - Renfro hasn't been posting in any "open" forum either.  Nothing at RU for a long long time.  Very little from MF as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 26, 2007, 10:50:19 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


nope.....and we sure have looked, lol....right klaas? lmao.

I know y'all have been on the case, I was just wondering.... it's *funny* how quiet it has been now that julia et al were told (it's my opinion that they were) to STHU....

Mrs. Red - Renfro hasn't been posting in any "open" forum either.  Nothing at RU for a long long time.  Very little from MF as well.

wonder if it is the calm before the storm???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 26, 2007, 10:52:45 PM
SO have we found any pictures of Joran from this summer?


nope.....and we sure have looked, lol....right klaas? lmao.

I know y'all have been on the case, I was just wondering.... it's *funny* how quiet it has been now that julia et al were told (it's my opinion that they were) to STHU....

Mrs. Red - Renfro hasn't been posting in any "open" forum either.  Nothing at RU for a long long time.  Very little from MF as well.

wonder if it is the calm before the storm???

I was just going to say the same thing mrs. red


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 10:54:34 PM
NOPE.....THIS IS HER>>>
http://gilayla.hyves.nl/?&pageid=5CTB9NMF18W84SGKC
Name: Gilayla Flanegin


She looks very, very young.  And nice.  Doesn't look like the usual girls who attract the PIMPS and has some religious posts on that site.  And note the photos of her friends wearing winter coats and stuff, maybe taken in The Netherlands or some where other than Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 10:56:59 PM
FYI -  I know there's been some question as to when this photo was taken at Joran's house.  According to the camera/film properties the photo was taken in 2005.  The question is was it taken before Joran went to Kia or after?  The question comes up because he is at his home with the girls, Satish and Freddy.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/AmandaGilFlorSatishJoran.jpg)


Aperture f/4.0
Camera make Samsung
Camera model Digimax 300
Comment Samsung Techwin
Date/Time 2005
Exposure program (auto)
Exposure bias 5.90
Exposure time 0.033 s (1/30)
Flash used Yes
Focal length 7.0mm
ISO equiv. 200
Jpeg process Baseline
Jpeg Quality normal
Metering Mode center weight
Resolution 2048 x 1536



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 26, 2007, 11:03:31 PM
FYI -  I know there's been some question as to when this photo was taken at Joran's house.  According to the camera/film properties the photo was taken in 2005.  The question is was it taken before Joran went to Kia or after?  The question comes up because he is at his home with the girls, Satish and Freddy.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/AmandaGilFlorSatishJoran.jpg)


Aperture f/4.0
Camera make Samsung
Camera model Digimax 300
Comment Samsung Techwin
Date/Time 2005
Exposure program (auto)
Exposure bias 5.90
Exposure time 0.033 s (1/30)
Flash used Yes
Focal length 7.0mm
ISO equiv. 200
Jpeg process Baseline
Jpeg Quality normal
Metering Mode center weight
Resolution 2048 x 1536


This is just my opinion.  After that police car conversation with the Kalpoes and Joran and Joran threatening them and they laughting at him would Satish be stupid enough to go to that house where the murder was committed.  They ratted on Paulus according to Joran.  Satish would not go anywhere without Deepak especially to the Sloot dump.  This is why I think it was before.  It was just another party at the Sloots with Joran and Friends.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 11:06:35 PM
San - I know what you mean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 26, 2007, 11:13:24 PM
This is just my opinion.  After that police car conversation with the Kalpoes and Joran and Joran threatening them and they laughting at him would Satish be stupid enough to go to that house where the murder was committed.  They ratted on Paulus according to Joran.  Satish would not go anywhere without Deepak especially to the Sloot dump.  This is why I think it was before.  It was just another party at the Sloots with Joran and Friends.
I agree, much more likely this pic is pre-crime.

Freddy take this pic? IIRC, he is at this gathering also?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 11:18:29 PM
This is just my opinion.  After that police car conversation with the Kalpoes and Joran and Joran threatening them and they laughting at him would Satish be stupid enough to go to that house where the murder was committed.  They ratted on Paulus according to Joran.  Satish would not go anywhere without Deepak especially to the Sloot dump.  This is why I think it was before.  It was just another party at the Sloots with Joran and Friends.
I agree, much more likely this pic is pre-crime.

Freddy take this pic? IIRC, he is at this gathering also?

Yes Freddy was there and most likely took the photo above:

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/28/47503063_f3b5ed4e2c.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 11:21:40 PM
This is just my opinion.  After that police car conversation with the Kalpoes and Joran and Joran threatening them and they laughting at him would Satish be stupid enough to go to that house where the murder was committed.  They ratted on Paulus according to Joran.  Satish would not go anywhere without Deepak especially to the Sloot dump.  This is why I think it was before.  It was just another party at the Sloots with Joran and Friends.
I agree, much more likely this pic is pre-crime.

Freddy take this pic? IIRC, he is at this gathering also?

Yes Freddy was there and most likely took the photo above:

(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/28/47503063_f3b5ed4e2c.jpg)

Lightened the first one up a bit so you can see Satish's hat:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/AmandaGilFlorSatishJoran2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 11:28:47 PM
I wonder why the girls are in bikinis and the guys in full street clothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 26, 2007, 11:30:19 PM
I wonder why the girls are in bikinis and the guys in full street clothing.

Because they're stupid and are hanging out with known rapists.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 26, 2007, 11:32:07 PM
Posted by Pearl at BFN regarding JaimeC (Beto's) employment:

This is Jaimie’s June 17th statement. Joran called him between 4 and 7 and asked him if he wanted to meet some American girls at Carlos N Charlies.

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 (4pm)and 19.00(7pm), I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number “xxxxxxx”. Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is “Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES”. Her calling name is “Pilar”. The mobile phone number of Pilar is “xxxxxxx”. The mobile phone number of Joran is “xxxxxxx”. Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to “Carlos & Charlies” and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn’t answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in “Caribbean Overseas”. I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.  

On May 30th 2005, in the nightly hours, I had not talked to Joran. It is possible that Joran phoned me, but I didn’t answer my mobile phone because I was sleeping. I am sure that Joran did not send me any messages with his mobile phone in the night of May 30th 2005.


Carribean Overseas, LTD .. “The Beef People”
Caribbean Overseas Ltd. has an established reputation as the largest foodservice supplier of quality foods to retail chains, hotels and restaurants throughout Aruba.
Caribbean Overseas' team of professionals will help you with merchandising, advertising and display techniques that support your sales and enhance your profit margin.
Caribbean Overseas – a company you can trust, services you can depend on, the best beef in town!
Our new home, a state-of the-art facility located in proximity of High- and Low rise hotel area, major city Oranjestad, Seaport and Airport. Easy access to our customers gives us the ability to expedite orders quickly and efficiently.
We are specialized in USDA Beef, Certified Angus Beef, Poultry and Seafood.

Our facility features:
- 50.000 square feet of space
- 35.000 square feet of freezing-space- 10 bay doors
- 15 trucks
Schotlandstraat 47
P.O. Box 43
Oranjestad, Aruba
Tel. (297) 582-1064
Fax. (297) 582-8213
G o o g l e's cache of http://cariboverseas.arubahost.com/ as

edit to add you cannot get direct access to their site now .. you get a multiple error message with NL in details.  I got this through cache of information.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2007, 11:34:27 PM
    I certainly hope this massive Cruise Ship Dock .......doesn't begin construction, or any "pre"construction activities before Tim and TES get down there! :shock:

    Nobody wants to believe that Reality is from South Africa??  And Dutch? :smt102


Reality
Guest
  Re: John Q. Kelly, Carlos & Charlie's, and the Big Lie in This Case
« Reply #128 on: December 31, 2005, 12:33:08 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Durban is my home town, born and bred, lived there for 42 years of my 49.

<snipped>


However ... Reality claimed in this following open letter that he lived was an American living in Aruba. 

Janet

___________


BFN
Quote from: Reality on June 02, 2006, 06:54:38 AM


Dear Curves,

I am truly saddened that you have allowed your fine organization to be swayed to a very small minority of hate mongers & xenophobes who for the most part have never even set foot in Aruba let alone even heard of Aruba prior to May 31st, 2005.

You’re pulling of the Aruba sweepstakes speaks volumes to a company being swayed by lies & fabrications.

As an American citizen living in Aruba for many years now let me give you a perspective that none of the “protest” emails can even come close to.

Aruba is by far the safest island destination in the Caribbean.
Aruba’s judicial system is based on Dutch law, world renowned as a fair and balanced system.

Aruba’s people are highly educated individuals where most here speak at least 3 to 5 languages.

Aruba has had ONE missing person in the last year, and that person may not even be a victim of a crime.

You have done your valued customers a disservice by pulling your Aruba sweepstakes by depriving them the opportunity to truly experience what an island paradise really is.

If you would like more information about the real Aruba please email at the following and I will be more than happy to set the record straight with facts not the fiction you have based your decision on to pull your Aruba Sweepstakes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 11:34:44 PM
I wonder why the girls are in bikinis and the guys in full street clothing.

Because they're stupid and are hanging out with known rapists.

I wonder.  Was it a pool party or a photo shoot?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 26, 2007, 11:38:53 PM
    I certainly hope this massive Cruise Ship Dock .......doesn't begin construction, or any "pre"construction activities before Tim and TES get down there! :shock:

    Nobody wants to believe that Reality is from South Africa??  And Dutch? :smt102


Reality
Guest
  Re: John Q. Kelly, Carlos & Charlie's, and the Big Lie in This Case
« Reply #128 on: December 31, 2005, 12:33:08 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Durban is my home town, born and bred, lived there for 42 years of my 49.

<snipped>


However ... Reality claimed in this following open letter that he lived was an American living in Aruba. 

Janet

___________


BFN
Quote from: Reality on June 02, 2006, 06:54:38 AM


Dear Curves,

I am truly saddened that you have allowed your fine organization to be swayed to a very small minority of hate mongers & xenophobes who for the most part have never even set foot in Aruba let alone even heard of Aruba prior to May 31st, 2005.

You’re pulling of the Aruba sweepstakes speaks volumes to a company being swayed by lies & fabrications.

As an American citizen living in Aruba for many years now let me give you a perspective that none of the “protest” emails can even come close to.

Aruba is by far the safest island destination in the Caribbean.
Aruba’s judicial system is based on Dutch law, world renowned as a fair and balanced system.

Aruba’s people are highly educated individuals where most here speak at least 3 to 5 languages.

Aruba has had ONE missing person in the last year, and that person may not even be a victim of a crime.

You have done your valued customers a disservice by pulling your Aruba sweepstakes by depriving them the opportunity to truly experience what an island paradise really is.

If you would like more information about the real Aruba please email at the following and I will be more than happy to set the record straight with facts not the fiction you have based your decision on to pull your Aruba Sweepstakes.

Oh, wow!  What an imagination.  The drop out rate in Aruba is just tremendous and the educational system really poor.

So now he is an American living in Aruba? 

Unreal!  He really does change facts to suit his need at the moment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2007, 11:47:51 PM

This is just my opinion.  After that police car conversation with the Kalpoes and Joran and Joran threatening them and they laughting at him would Satish be stupid enough to go to that house where the murder was committed.  They ratted on Paulus according to Joran.   Satish would not go anywhere without Deepak especially to the Sloot dump.  This is why I think it was before.  It was just another party at the Sloots with Joran and Friends.

Paul Reynolds ... Natalee's uncle ... implied that Paulus was implicated in Joran, Deepak and Satish's original statements.  Considering that Deepak and Satish's May 31, 2005 declarations do not implicate Paulus ... I would assume that there were statements taken on May 30, 2005.

Janet


Paul Reynolds
'Scarborough Country'
August 26, 2005


REYNOLDS: Well, we certainly think they know more, but we think all three are involved. We think Joran and Deepak and Satish are all involved.  And, you know, we still think the father was at least involved in the cover-up. And that‘s based on the statements that the boys gave in the beginning.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 12:05:17 AM
why do these ARUBA apologists always have to BRING up the idea that BECAUSE some people can speak 3 differnet languages that somehow that means they are extremely intelligent


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz   


it defies logic

it makes no sense


i know people that speak 3 languages and they are numb as a pounded thumb


NEWS FLASH

speaking more than 1 language does make you intelligent  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 08:24:57 AM
I wonder why the girls are in bikinis and the guys in full street clothing.

Because they're stupid and are hanging out with known rapists.

I wonder.  Was it a pool party or a photo shoot?

BINGO  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: jackb on August 27, 2007, 08:36:22 AM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/11cmcopy.jpg)

Aruba may need to watch allowing Venesuelan investors as Dictators keep laws at their own whim.  The Aruban people would do well to keep Chavez and his people at bay as they are not up to any good.           jackb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 09:40:05 AM
Klaas,

I saw this posted at BFN.  Could this be a link to Andres Meneses? 


Interesting name in this find:

Friday, August 12 th 2005
Review: Oscar Hernández
In Aruba there's always something to do on Fridays, but for shore you have to make a stop in Carlos and Chalies, like we did last Friday 12 th , every day in Carlos and Charlies is a special day. We arrived before midnight, just the perfect moment to star the party in Aruba , ready to have fun and dance al night long to the best hits of the moment, from Salsa to Reggeaton with the music that local DJ Andres was playing.

www.guiafashion.com/.../internacional/aruba.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 27, 2007, 09:46:53 AM
Klaas,

I saw this posted at BFN.  Could this be a link to Andres Meneses? 


Interesting name in this find:

Friday, August 12 th 2005
Review: Oscar Hernández
In Aruba there's always something to do on Fridays, but for shore you have to make a stop in Carlos and Chalies, like we did last Friday 12 th , every day in Carlos and Charlies is a special day. We arrived before midnight, just the perfect moment to star the party in Aruba , ready to have fun and dance al night long to the best hits of the moment, from Salsa to Reggeaton with the music that local DJ Andres was playing.

www.guiafashion.com/.../internacional/aruba.html


Link: DJ Andres Ceja (http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/23-05-04rodeoparty/pag2.htm)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 27, 2007, 10:09:45 AM
Klaas,

I saw this posted at BFN.  Could this be a link to Andres Meneses? 


Interesting name in this find:

Friday, August 12 th 2005
Review: Oscar Hernández
In Aruba there's always something to do on Fridays, but for shore you have to make a stop in Carlos and Chalies, like we did last Friday 12 th , every day in Carlos and Charlies is a special day. We arrived before midnight, just the perfect moment to star the party in Aruba , ready to have fun and dance al night long to the best hits of the moment, from Salsa to Reggeaton with the music that local DJ Andres was playing.

www.guiafashion.com/.../internacional/aruba.html


Link: DJ Andres Ceja (http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/23-05-04rodeoparty/pag2.htm)




Friday 17th of June
CARLOS & CHARLIES
When you hear the word “PARTY”, your mind automatically takes you to Carlos & Charlies. Saturday June 18 we met with a very animated crowd enjoying the variation of music which was in charge of DJ Andres.
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html

Possibly a pic of DJ Andres Here (http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/18-06-05carloscharlies/pag2.htm)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Pita on August 27, 2007, 10:12:43 AM
Friday 17th of June
CARLOS & CHARLIES

Review : Ramses Aaron
When you hear the word “PARTY”, your mind automatically takes you to Carlos & Charlies. Saturday June 18 we met with a very animated crowd enjoying the variation of music which was in charge of DJ Andres. It was the best way to start a Saturday night. The streets of Aruba were busy with party animals enjoying the nightlife in Aruba . Carlos & Charlies is definitely a place to be on weekends.


(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/18-06-05carloscharlies/27.jpg)

http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/18-06-05carloscharlies/pag2.htm



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Pita on August 27, 2007, 10:14:03 AM
VMS, looks like we're on the same page.   :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 10:17:58 AM
VMS, looks like we're on the same page.   :lol:

That makes three of us.  lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 10:26:32 AM
Klaas,

I saw this posted at BFN.  Could this be a link to Andres Meneses? 


Interesting name in this find:

Friday, August 12 th 2005
Review: Oscar Hernández
In Aruba there's always something to do on Fridays, but for shore you have to make a stop in Carlos and Chalies, like we did last Friday 12 th , every day in Carlos and Charlies is a special day. We arrived before midnight, just the perfect moment to star the party in Aruba , ready to have fun and dance al night long to the best hits of the moment, from Salsa to Reggeaton with the music that local DJ Andres was playing.

www.guiafashion.com/.../internacional/aruba.html


Link: DJ Andres Ceja (http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/23-05-04rodeoparty/pag2.htm)


I can't really tell if your link is for an event at Carlos and Charlie's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 27, 2007, 10:30:59 AM
Klaas,

I saw this posted at BFN.  Could this be a link to Andres Meneses? 


Interesting name in this find:

Friday, August 12 th 2005
Review: Oscar Hernández
In Aruba there's always something to do on Fridays, but for shore you have to make a stop in Carlos and Chalies, like we did last Friday 12 th , every day in Carlos and Charlies is a special day. We arrived before midnight, just the perfect moment to star the party in Aruba , ready to have fun and dance al night long to the best hits of the moment, from Salsa to Reggeaton with the music that local DJ Andres was playing.

www.guiafashion.com/.../internacional/aruba.html


Link: DJ Andres Ceja (http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/23-05-04rodeoparty/pag2.htm)


I can't really tell if your link is for an event at Carlos and Charlie's.


The DJ Andres Ceja was responsible for the wonderful music and made locales and tourist dance al night long. And what better host, Carlos and Charlie were there to make shore that things felt great and all night the party was just starting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 10:39:45 AM
So are you guys thinking this DJ Andres is actually Andres Meneses?  It sure would make more sense.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 10:40:26 AM

I can't really tell if your link is for an event at Carlos and Charlie's.


The DJ Andres Ceja was responsible for the wonderful music and made locales and tourist dance al night long. And what better host, Carlos and Charlie were there to make shore that things felt great and all night the party was just starting.


Duh!  I guess I was too busy looking at pics and should have spent more time reading.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 10:41:26 AM
So are you guys thinking this DJ Andres is actually Andres Meneses?  It sure would make more sense.

vms found the last name of the CnC DJ.  It's not Meneses.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 27, 2007, 10:58:19 AM
An interesting 'astrological' reading  :-|

http://forensicastrology.blogspot.com/2007/07/natalee-holloway_17.html

Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Natalee Holloway
 

AMERICAN STUDENT MISSING IN ARUBA

Natalee Holloway has become a famous cold case. She went missing on a student trip to Aruba and has not been seen since May 30, 2005. As an "Forensic" Astrologer, I cannot resist doing a chart for the night of her disappearance. This is what I found:

At the time of her disappearance Pisces was rising and Sagittarius was on the midheaven. The ruler of the chart, Neptune, was posited in the twelfth house along with the Moon and Uranus. Mars is at the Ascendant and Pluto is at the Midheaven, squared.
From this configuration I can ascertain:

1. THERE WAS AN ARGUEMENT WHICH BECAME PHYSICAL IN NATURE.(Mars)
2. NATALEE STARTED THIS FIGHT.
3. THIS BECAME A VERY EMOTIONALLY CHARGED CONFRONTATION RAPIDLY (Moon)
4. IT WAS NOT PLANNED AND JUST "CAME OUT OF THE BLUE", A TOTAL SURPRISE(Uranus)
5. IT IS KNOWN THAT SHE WAS DRINKING.. HOWEVER, THERE COULD HAVE BEEN DRUGS INVOLVED AS WELL, PERHAPS NOT TO HER KNOWLEDGE (Neptune in 12th)
6. THE OUTCOME WOULD RESULT IN A VERY PUBLIC AIRING OF THE SITUATION(Pluto)
7. THE SITUATION ITSELF WOULD REMAIN A MYSTERY
8. SHE IS BURIED ON THE ISLAND NEAR THE WATER IN AN AREA WHICH WAS FRESHLY DUG UP PRIOR TO HER DEATH(Uranus)
9. THIS GRAVE NEAR THE WATER IS ALSO NEAR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A RADIO STATION, AN AIRPORT, AN AIRPLANE HANGER, AN ELECTRICAL TOWER, A POWER STATION, A NEW MARINA, PUBLIC SHOWERS OR BATHROOMS, A PLACE WHERE DRUGS ARE USED OR MADE
THIS PLACE WAS RECENTLY DUG UP FOR SOME OTHER PURPOSE AND WAS CHOSEN BECAUSE OF THAT

At the time of her disappearance, the following other planetary aspects appeared:
Seventh house ruler Mercury in the third house in Gemini
Mercury placed in conjuction with the Sun, also in the third house
Saturn disposits the Moon from the fifth house and the ruler of the midheaven, Jupiter, is posited in the seventh house retrograde
From these configurations, I can ascertain:

1. HER COMPANIONS AT THE TIME WERE TWO YOUNG MALES (Mercury & Sun) WHO WERE PERHAPS TWINS, AT THE LEAST BROTHERS (Third House).
2. ONE MALE WAS YOUNGER (Mercury) AND THE SECOND WAS OLDER (Sun) AND THEY WERE VERY CLOSE (conjuction)
3. THERE WAS A SEXUAL OR ROMANTIC ATTRACTION (Fifth house) BUT SOMEHOW A WET RAG WAS DROPPED ON THE SITUATION (Saturn)
4. IT WILL BE 5 YEARS (2010) BEFORE HER LOCATION IS FINALLY DISCOVERED (Jupiter retrograde).

FOR ASTROLOGERS WHO WISH TO INVESTIGATE THIS AS WELL:
NATALEE WENT MISSING AT 1:00 AM ON MAY 30, 2005 IN ARUBA
NATALEE WAS BORN ON OCT 21, 1986

Posted by Caroline at 6:26 AM     



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:35:26 AM
(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/aug%2026/hos%20spaans%20lagoen/hos%20spaans%20lagoen.jpg)

Water spout in Aruba yesterday!  :shock:

Hos feroz pafo di rif serca di De Palm Island        
Sunday, 26 August 2007 

Diadomingo atardi Aruba a nota precencia di diferente hos specialmente na nos costanan. Esaki a causa bastante panico den e comunidad cu e miedo cu esaki lo dal riba tera. Riba e imagen aki por mira un di e hosnan net patras di e rif patras di De Palm Island. Click read more pa mira e imagen mas grandi.

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/1950/5/

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 12:00:43 PM
(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/aug%2026/hos%20spaans%20lagoen/hos%20spaans%20lagoen.jpg)

Water spout in Aruba yesterday!  :shock:

Hos feroz pafo di rif serca di De Palm Island        
Sunday, 26 August 2007 

Diadomingo atardi Aruba a nota precencia di diferente hos specialmente na nos costanan. Esaki a causa bastante panico den e comunidad cu e miedo cu esaki lo dal riba tera. Riba e imagen aki por mira un di e hosnan net patras di e rif patras di De Palm Island. Click read more pa mira e imagen mas grandi.

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/1950/5/

 


They have a video of the water spout at the 24ora site now:

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/1957/5/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 27, 2007, 12:10:32 PM
Sharon,

Interesting.  Also good that this was just posted in July, 2007, as it means people are still following this tragedy and paying attention.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Sam on August 27, 2007, 12:10:43 PM
Sharon, that was an interesting find on the astrology.
Not sure I have much faith in that but a lot of folks do just like Psychics.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tylergal on August 27, 2007, 12:34:01 PM
I wonder why the girls are in bikinis and the guys in full street clothing.

Because they're stupid and are hanging out with known rapists.



I wonder.  Was it a pool party or a photo shoot?


I thought these were photos taken after the Big Sporter Baby was let out of KIA but just prior to his departure for the Neverlands.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tylergal on August 27, 2007, 12:34:46 PM
How do these messages get so screwed up an intertwined when one "quotes?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 12:41:06 PM
How do these messages get so screwed up an intertwined when one "quotes?"

Dugga spread out the quotes so they would be easier to read.  Because of that the bottom of the quote is further down than it used to be and people are posting within the quote.  You just need to scroll down a little further and make sure you are below the quote tag.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 12:45:19 PM
An interesting 'astrological' reading  :-|

http://forensicastrology.blogspot.com/2007/07/natalee-holloway_17.html

Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Natalee Holloway
 

AMERICAN STUDENT MISSING IN ARUBA

Natalee Holloway has become a famous cold case. She went missing on a student trip to Aruba and has not been seen since May 30, 2005. As an "Forensic" Astrologer, I cannot resist doing a chart for the night of her disappearance. This is what I found:

At the time of her disappearance Pisces was rising and Sagittarius was on the midheaven. The ruler of the chart, Neptune, was posited in the twelfth house along with the Moon and Uranus. Mars is at the Ascendant and Pluto is at the Midheaven, squared.
From this configuration I can ascertain:

1. THERE WAS AN ARGUEMENT WHICH BECAME PHYSICAL IN NATURE.(Mars)
2. NATALEE STARTED THIS FIGHT.
3. THIS BECAME A VERY EMOTIONALLY CHARGED CONFRONTATION RAPIDLY (Moon)
4. IT WAS NOT PLANNED AND JUST "CAME OUT OF THE BLUE", A TOTAL SURPRISE(Uranus)
5. IT IS KNOWN THAT SHE WAS DRINKING.. HOWEVER, THERE COULD HAVE BEEN DRUGS INVOLVED AS WELL, PERHAPS NOT TO HER KNOWLEDGE (Neptune in 12th)
6. THE OUTCOME WOULD RESULT IN A VERY PUBLIC AIRING OF THE SITUATION(Pluto)
7. THE SITUATION ITSELF WOULD REMAIN A MYSTERY
8. SHE IS BURIED ON THE ISLAND NEAR THE WATER IN AN AREA WHICH WAS FRESHLY DUG UP PRIOR TO HER DEATH(Uranus)
9. THIS GRAVE NEAR THE WATER IS ALSO NEAR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A RADIO STATION, AN AIRPORT, AN AIRPLANE HANGER, AN ELECTRICAL TOWER, A POWER STATION, A NEW MARINA, PUBLIC SHOWERS OR BATHROOMS, A PLACE WHERE DRUGS ARE USED OR MADE
THIS PLACE WAS RECENTLY DUG UP FOR SOME OTHER PURPOSE AND WAS CHOSEN BECAUSE OF THAT

At the time of her disappearance, the following other planetary aspects appeared:
Seventh house ruler Mercury in the third house in Gemini
Mercury placed in conjuction with the Sun, also in the third house
Saturn disposits the Moon from the fifth house and the ruler of the midheaven, Jupiter, is posited in the seventh house retrograde
From these configurations, I can ascertain:

1. HER COMPANIONS AT THE TIME WERE TWO YOUNG MALES (Mercury & Sun) WHO WERE PERHAPS TWINS, AT THE LEAST BROTHERS (Third House).
2. ONE MALE WAS YOUNGER (Mercury) AND THE SECOND WAS OLDER (Sun) AND THEY WERE VERY CLOSE (conjuction)
3. THERE WAS A SEXUAL OR ROMANTIC ATTRACTION (Fifth house) BUT SOMEHOW A WET RAG WAS DROPPED ON THE SITUATION (Saturn)
4. IT WILL BE 5 YEARS (2010) BEFORE HER LOCATION IS FINALLY DISCOVERED (Jupiter retrograde).

FOR ASTROLOGERS WHO WISH TO INVESTIGATE THIS AS WELL:
NATALEE WENT MISSING AT 1:00 AM ON MAY 30, 2005 IN ARUBA
NATALEE WAS BORN ON OCT 21, 1986

Posted by Caroline at 6:26 AM   

Good Morning!  this is very interesting.....but the 5 years before her location is discovered is really depressing!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 27, 2007, 12:58:48 PM
How do these messages get so screwed up an intertwined when one "quotes?"

Tyler, I have noticed sometimes people start typing their quote before the last quote sign [/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 01:19:08 PM
How do these messages get so screwed up an intertwined when one "quotes?"

Tyler, I have noticed sometimes people start typing their quote before the last quote sign
[/b]
[/quote]


I have been trying to remember to scroll to the last "[/quote]" ...then put cursor at the end of that and hit space bar a couple of times to lower my post. Sometimes I4get though, lol. Anyway...I have been messing around with some photos and just realized I CAN BLOCK OUT FACES ! LOL! I can also cut and paste a photo piece too...hehe. Looky here>> I put Jaime in the HE photo, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: LilPuma on August 27, 2007, 01:24:18 PM
Sharon,

Interesting.  Also good that this was just posted in July, 2007, as it means people are still following this tragedy and paying attention.

.

That is good to hear.  I'm not here posting, but justice for Natalee and an end to the deception is still in my prayers. 

Have a great day, Monkeys! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 01:39:02 PM
 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 27, 2007, 01:49:32 PM
Looks good so far! Thanks! I think I would have to question the part where he goes from the pond to Marriott to wash off blood...if one is bloody near a pond....ummmm DUH...why not wash it off at the pond??

No towels at the pond!

 :smt026

That's it!!


Ringo wrote:
Two bloody towels and a key card. Don't know who they belong to.
Thats the "word".

Are those being tested? What about the rumored condo that JVDS supposedly has access to in the racquet club area?

http://www.nataleeholloway.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=1482&PN=1&get=last
_____________________________________________________________


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 27, 2007, 01:53:59 PM
Eduardo Boeti


Kafka: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:11 am
Dutch radio just said it's a 20 year old guy

http://www.refugeesunleashed.net/viewtopic.php?t=1175&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0


WidgetTheMidget Says: April 24th, 2006 at 1:04 pm
EB ………Could Be ……..

Eduard ( Dachi ) Brete
………………….

WidgetTheMidget Says: April 24th, 2006 at 1:18 pm
Eduard Is Friend To Jamie ……..& Quincy ……..& Joran …..& Koen
& Sander …………….


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/04/23/aruba-natalee-holloway-comment-post-20/#comments


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 27, 2007, 02:05:24 PM
carolinagurl138
Newbie
Newbie
Joined: 14 July 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31
Posted: 24 July 2005 at 11:29am | IP Logged Quote carolinagurl138
I talk to Koen G and he said yea that was him.
Message:
On 7/21/2005, 9:14:48 PM, Gennifer wrote:

Hey...I was looking at some of my friend's pics and i asked her who the boy in the blue was with a drink and she said it was you...it was from a birthday party. I was just wandering if it was you if so i was just wanting to chat with you! Can't wait to here from you.

hey...yeah thats me..at my friends b-day party..so yeah if you wanna add me on hotmail its..koeng61@hotmail.com

carolinagurl138
Newbie
Newbie
Joined: 14 July 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31
Posted: 24 July 2005 at 10:26pm | IP Logged Quote carolinagurl138
He already wrote me back...I am still working on him trying to get him to talk...

On 7/24/2005, 11:35:28, Gennifer wrote:

I bet you are tired of the attention your getting down there....Has it been rough on you? I seen you in some pictures with Joran too...I know that has to suck..you know haveing a buddy that you know didn't do anything...being the main suspect in everyone's eyes? I had the same thing happen with me and one of my friends..but of course it wasn't as major or all over the T.V. Well i got to go but if you ever want to talk to vent it out. Let me know...I almost think the whole thing is just silly. what about you?



yeah a little but now im in america doing fun thing to get my head out of this situation...but i would like to get to know you better and stuf...i also think its verry silly i know this guy for over 14 years now and he would never hurt any girl so i dont know why he's still locked up


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 27, 2007, 02:07:34 PM
SILLY?  He thinks it's silly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 27, 2007, 02:18:21 PM
SILLY?  He thinks it's silly!

Joran thought the boycott was stilly also. :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tylergal on August 27, 2007, 02:26:13 PM
Silly, perhaps.  Did it work?  You bet your sweet a**.  We must keep the pressure to keep it working.  Let the Aruban rats and hagbags know we can outlast them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 02:30:26 PM
I think there are some clues throughout the investigation in the timing of events and who implicated who. I will always be suspicious of what happened to this man as well as Pitbull. Where is the PV of LVR on june 16th 2005?

Thursday, June 16
??? am............Steve G. Croes goes to police station and is questioned
???..................Steve G. Croes goes to work @ Tattoo boat
???..................Lorenzo van Rijn questioned by police
????................Max Arendsz questioned by police

Friday, June 17
6:30 am.........Steve Gregory Croes arrested

Saturday, June 18
8:00 am.........Rene van Heyningen found murdered “Columbian necktie”
.......................van Heyningen’s body dumped in government cemetery

???..................Paulus & Anita van der Sloot questioned by police for 5 hours
???..................Sergio Gomez reported missing


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 27, 2007, 02:41:11 PM
My focus is, and shall remain, on the main suspects until there is some concrete evidence other than blog rumor to look elsewhere.

Those suspects remain J2K and are the ones to this day named by KLPD as the prime suspects.  I think Joran van der Sloot, the two Kalpoes and Paulus are the ones responsible for whatever happened to Natalee as well as her subsequent disappearance.

I think most things that take the focus off those suspects are diversions as I have looked for over two years and can't make a contact to anybody who is not named as a suspect, including the other PIMPS named as suspects.

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tylergal on August 27, 2007, 02:43:50 PM
I hav no idea the involvement of anyone other than J2K, but appears there must be someone/something bigger involved, thus all the coverup.  No, I am not sure it stems from a rave party at LVR but it never hurts to leave no stone unturned.  There is a reason why all the island is defending these PIMPS and it is not because of Joran's good looks or the social standing of the Kalpoes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 02:44:34 PM
Silly, perhaps.  Did it work?  You bet your sweet a**.  We must keep the pressure to keep it working.  Let the Aruban rats and hagbags know we can outlast them.


I can't fathom any young man or boy using the word 'silly'. I know mine never has. I think it is weird.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tylergal on August 27, 2007, 02:45:50 PM
So are you guys thinking this DJ Andres is actually Andres Meneses?  It sure would make more sense.

It seems they all assume aliases, sign of a criminal culture, and I would not be surprised and suspect this is the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 02:46:03 PM
Silly, perhaps.  Did it work?  You bet your sweet a**.  We must keep the pressure to keep it working.  Let the Aruban rats and hagbags know we can outlast them.


I can't fathom any young man or boy using the word 'silly'. I know mine never has. I think it is weird.

oops...4got to add...
Not that there is anything wrong with that ...  :wink: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 02:51:46 PM
My focus is, and shall remain, on the main suspects until there is some concrete evidence other than blog rumor to look elsewhere.

Those suspects remain J2K and are the ones to this day named by KLPD as the prime suspects.  I think Joran van der Sloot, the two Kalpoes and Paulus are the ones responsible for whatever happened to Natalee as well as her subsequent disappearance.

I think most things that take the focus off those suspects are diversions as I have looked for over two years and can't make a contact to anybody who is not named as a suspect, including the other PIMPS named as suspects.

JMO

You have stated your opinion 1,000 times on LVR and it is noted. I also feel that JK2 and PVDS are the main suspect but I believe LVR is involved and I will always research every avenue I have with everyone and anyone who is involved with Natalees dissapearance. I dont think LVR is disinformation and if anything they have tried to distance him from this case.MO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 02:52:16 PM
I think there are some clues throughout the investigation in the timing of events and who implicated who. I will always be suspicious of what happened to this man as well as Pitbull. Where is the PV of LVR on june 16th 2005?

Thursday, June 16
??? am............Steve G. Croes goes to police station and is questioned
???..................Steve G. Croes goes to work @ Tattoo boat
???..................Lorenzo van Rijn questioned by police
????................Max Arendsz questioned by police

Friday, June 17
6:30 am.........Steve Gregory Croes arrested

Saturday, June 18
8:00 am.........Rene van Heyningen found murdered “Columbian necktie”
.......................van Heyningen’s body dumped in government cemetery

???..................Paulus & Anita van der Sloot questioned by police for 5 hours
???..................Sergio Gomez reported missing


Interesting observation.  The timing is what makes it even more interesting.  I wish we had a pic of the macho woman who as able to lift a dead man's body into a truck and lift it out of the truck later at the cemetery.

I think Gomez was eventually located wasn't he?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 02:56:55 PM
Many things throughout this case disturb me and just one more was added to the list today...Heli made a post a BFN. I am sure it is Heli from RU. That disturbs me.  :smt074 just had to get that off my chest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 27, 2007, 03:08:23 PM
is there a link to the codebreaker theory or whatever it is?  Sorry, but I have have looked here, there and everywhere..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 03:10:04 PM
I think there are some clues throughout the investigation in the timing of events and who implicated who. I will always be suspicious of what happened to this man as well as Pitbull. Where is the PV of LVR on June 16th 2005?

Thursday, June 16
??? am............Steve G. Croes goes to police station and is questioned
???..................Steve G. Croes goes to work @ Tattoo boat
???..................Lorenzo van Rijn questioned by police
????................Max Arendsz questioned by police

Friday, June 17
6:30 am.........Steve Gregory Croes arrested

Saturday, June 18
8:00 am.........Rene van Heyningen found murdered “Columbian necktie”
.......................van Heyningen’s body dumped in government cemetery

???..................Paulus & Anita van der Sloot questioned by police for 5 hours
???..................Sergio Gomez reported missing


Interesting observation.  The timing is what makes it even more interesting.  I wish we had a pic of the macho woman who as able to lift a dead man's body into a truck and lift it out of the truck later at the cemetery.

I think Gomez was eventually located wasn't he?

Gomez was located and macho woman I believe implicated two other men who had helped but no one else was arrested. Both families complained to the media and after that arrests were made. Extremely suspicious murders..IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 03:14:36 PM
is there a link to the codebreaker theory or whatever it is?  Sorry, but I have have looked here, there and everywhere..


It is easier to read like this, rather than at the site. It was posted at BFN.

Codebreaker @ BFN Natalee Holloway-Open Discussion
Reply #508 on: August 25, 2007, 11:41:34 AM
the bruise was caused by a wreck on his bike , while talking to 2ks, while returning from Flor's house at2{26am with a key, to take Natalee's body to.IMO.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reply #512 on: August 25, 2007, 04:15:48 PM
Hi:
I've never written on any blogs before, but I want to get my opinion on Natalee's murder and her location, based on facts only. I can tell you
now, she was in 4 different places, and I also know the addresses, and
buoy numbers, of these places.
She was murdered at Salinja Pond at around 1:20 am, then hided in barb bushes, jvds is the one that killed her with a rock to her head, she bled
profusely, this is how jvds got blood on his legs and shoes, and how he transfered blood in 2ks backseat area, that's why they stopped at Marriott
entrance, so jvds could wash off blood, 2ks waited for him, then dropped
jvds at home at1:45 am, 2ks got home at 2:05am, to pick up tools to bury
her with. but before they got to jvds's house, jvds disposed of shoes in
vicinty of Fermins Bar. When jvds told pvds what happen, pvds called Guido
at work, and hired him to get rid of the body, that's when guido called andre,
to bring his truck,they would be paid well, jvds called Flor to give him a key
to French's Steakhouse, 55 J.E.Irausquin blvd. this is in vicinity of Abhambra
pvds loaded jvds bike in back of jeep, and dropped jvds off at Flor's house with
bike, pvds headed for ATMs until 4:00am.. will continue later
codebreaker
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bleachedblack asks: Can you please tell us more about the purpose of this key? Why would they need to go to this Steakhouse?
Reply #519 on: August 25, 2007, 06:39:31 PM
codebreaker says:
because it was closed, and has a walk in cooler, plus most likey closed on mon.
also the body was removed mon. night.

Reply #532 on: August 25, 2007, 10:16:43 PM
When jvds was dropped off at Flor's house, he picked up a key and
rode his bike back, at 2:26am he called 2ks to meet him at the pond
at this time he had a wreck on the bike,this explains the static that dk heard plus the bruise seen next day by his classmates. sk was driving, when jvds pulled up on his bike, sk jumped in back so  jvds could tell dk the plan. and they can't go because his car was too noisy, at this time around 2:35am, the gardener
drove by, at 2:40am, guido and andre pull up, 2ks head for home, at 2:45am
the body is loaded.2:45am jvds sends textmsg to 2ks that they were on their
way(the barb bushes was reason for scratches) at 3:00am the 2ks get home.
at 3:05am dk gets textmsg that body was delivered, at 3:11am jvds sends
textmsg to Flor telling her same messg.
                    Meetings
The first meeting was held at the Racquet club at 6:00pm mon,,5/30/05,
with Koen,Sander,Flor,Freddy,Amanda, Gilayla, so they could get their stories
straight, and when they would be paid, Koen and Sander were told to help
pvds steal the Crab Trap from Fishermans Huts later that night.
The second meeting was 8:00pm that night at Radisson Casino,with DK,
guido, Andre,Beto, also to get stories straight, also when they get paid..
also after 11:00pm pick up Natalee's body, and return jvds's house.
This is when DK,pvds,jvds, were burying the body next to the house, that
they were interrupted by Beth& Jug, and were sent on a wild goose chase,
so Dk and pvds could get the car moved, so nobody would have an excuse
to enter the prop. when the body was buried next to his house the two dogs were
digging up the body, jvds didn't go to school next day, body had to be moved inside, and put in freezer, prepare for final place. this also explains
new patio cement work
                         Alibis and Movies
2ks were seen cleaning the car on 5/30/05 next morning, but couldn't
removed all blood, he took his car to Automobile enterprise, to get it
detailed and replace seats if needed, then he went back to Pond area.
and police the area, (he was seen doing this by a witness, for T.J. Ward)
he took the C&C logo cups placed by entrance Marriott, drove to Arahi beach
to mark his spot(urinate), then took her under pants,condoms, tape, and
wrappers from condoms to Bird Sanctuary, to mis lead police.
jvds protrays himself after Richard Kuklinski (the Ice Man of N.J.) when you read the police car tapes,he calls the 2KS Friend after each sentence, and
at the end tells them he's going to kill them. he also kelp bodies in freezers.
this was his MO. he also was a sociopath
S. Croes is not involved, when he heard pvds had deep pockets, and paying
all the Pimps, he jump on the bandwagon.
2ks don't know where's Natalee's body is at..
why did pvds send two younger sons to Florida, when he got arrested??
On 6/3/05 fri. at 9:00pm Beto, koen, Sander, met at jvds's apt., and eat
pizza, and played cards, getting ready for a boat ride,after midnight they
got to Container Harbour, they were at berth #5, this is were they unload
containers import,export all weekdays, they are left open on weekends. so
 they can park mega cruise ships if needed, it's 820 ft. long, water is 32 to
36ft. deep, her hands were put into 2.5gal. her head also was put into a 2.5
gal. bucket  the hands were dropped at center of this dock by marker#5.
they travel north est. 200ft.then dropped her head and still went north
and dropped her body #45 buoy or marker, this is a channel and protected
from waves, they could have used a small boat?? oars or ele. motor, very quite..
Beto works part time for Caribbean overseas, very familiar with area.
koen,sander have boating experience.
I hope no one gets offended
                                                    codebreaker
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reply #538 on: August 25, 2007, 11:05:06 PM
the family was informed by me in dec. of this location, but I
didn't have the marker numbers, my in fo comes from the liar of aruba,
and even they can't lie without 10% truth, it's easier to search a channel
or dock than an ocean, if it was your daughter what would you do.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THAT"S FLOR she is the weak link, without a doubt???
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rtst1 asks...
According to your account, Beto, Koen & Sander are the ones who would have knowledge of the bouy or marker numbers.  Was anyone else with them at Container Harbor...?

Reply #545 on: Today at 12:16:19 AM » 

codebreaker answers
only jvds that I know of..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anna states:
I don't think Joran wanting to be like the Iceman meant that he was a planned executioner, just that he admired this monster's detachment and ability to kill without emotion.

Sort of like doing so then going home and looking up soccer scores and watching porn, I guess.  Going to school next day and giving the appearance of total normalcy.

Also the use of cold storage.

The ability to dissociate from the crime.  Unfortunately for Joran, I think that is exactly how many see him.  I know I do.

Reply #589 on: Today at 01:40:11 PM
you hit the nail right on the head, this was a planned rape only..codebreaker
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 27, 2007, 03:17:30 PM
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!! :smt052


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 03:21:10 PM
Eduardo Boeti


Kafka: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:11 am
Dutch radio just said it's a 20 year old guy

http://www.refugeesunleashed.net/viewtopic.php?t=1175&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0


WidgetTheMidget Says: April 24th, 2006 at 1:04 pm
EB ………Could Be ……..

Eduard ( Dachi ) Brete
………………….

WidgetTheMidget Says: April 24th, 2006 at 1:18 pm
Eduard Is Friend To Jamie ……..& Quincy ……..& Joran …..& Koen
& Sander …………….


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/04/23/aruba-natalee-holloway-comment-post-20/#comments

AAhhhh I remember this conversation now  ...thanks Kermit...BTW...where is the Widget????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 03:25:34 PM
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!!! :smt052


You're welcome. Going out 4 a while, bbl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 27, 2007, 03:54:04 PM
My focus is, and shall remain, on the main suspects until there is some concrete evidence other than blog rumor to look elsewhere.

Those suspects remain J2K and are the ones to this day named by KLPD as the prime suspects.  I think Joran van der Sloot, the two Kalpoes and Paulus are the ones responsible for whatever happened to Natalee as well as her subsequent disappearance.

I think most things that take the focus off those suspects are diversions as I have looked for over two years and can't make a contact to anybody who is not named as a suspect, including the other PIMPS named as suspects.

JMO

You have stated your opinion 1,000 times on LVR and it is noted. I also feel that JK2 and PVDS are the main suspect but I believe LVR is involved and I will always research every avenue I have with everyone and anyone who is involved with Natalees dissapearance. I dont think LVR is disinformation and if anything they have tried to distance him from this case.MO

Well, then I certainly won't trouble you by stating my opinion again.  Sorry to have done so but thought we were all free to do that.  Evidently not. 

Why should you state your opinion but mine is 1,000 times?  I don't care who or what you research but would appreciate the right to my own opinions as well. 

But I will keep mine to myself in the future rather than have any more of your nasty remarks about mine.  Guess I can go crawl back under that rock you told me to, huh?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 04:23:01 PM
Have there been anymore postings from codebreaker?  I have mixed emotions about these posts.....If they are correct this person should be talking to the FBI and the IMMEDIATE family members.....if this is someone's idea of a joke...he/she is one sick individual...and we know there are some real sickies that have surfaced due to Natalee's case......I'd love to see the FACTS that this is based on......it just seems that it's ODD that this comes out when TES is preparing for a search.  I hope Debbie has checked to see where this person is posting from.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 04:25:25 PM
My focus is, and shall remain, on the main suspects until there is some concrete evidence other than blog rumor to look elsewhere.

Those suspects remain J2K and are the ones to this day named by KLPD as the prime suspects.  I think Joran van der Sloot, the two Kalpoes and Paulus are the ones responsible for whatever happened to Natalee as well as her subsequent disappearance.

I think most things that take the focus off those suspects are diversions as I have looked for over two years and can't make a contact to anybody who is not named as a suspect, including the other PIMPS named as suspects.

JMO

You have stated your opinion 1,000 times on LVR and it is noted. I also feel that JK2 and PVDS are the main suspect but I believe LVR is involved and I will always research every avenue I have with everyone and anyone who is involved with Natalees dissapearance. I dont think LVR is disinformation and if anything they have tried to distance him from this case.MO

Well, then I certainly won't trouble you by stating my opinion again.  Sorry to have done so but thought we were all free to do that.  Evidently not. 

Why should you state your opinion but mine is 1,000 times?  I don't care who or what you research but would appreciate the right to my own opinions as well. 

But I will keep mine to myself in the future rather than have any more of your nasty remarks about mine.  Guess I can go crawl back under that rock you told me to, huh?



Every time I bring up Lorenzo you have to state that you think he is not involved. We hear it over and over again. It is your opinion and that is great but it doesnt mean that you have to mention that every single time. I will continue my research on him just like others research shango or whatever else they think is worth looking into. We all know your opinion on the matter and its the end of the discussion. I am not going to fight with you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:25:39 PM
Have there been anymore postings from codebreaker?  I have mixed emotions about these posts.....If they are correct this person should be talking to the FBI and the IMMEDIATE family members.....if this is someone's idea of a joke...he/she is one sick individual...and we know there are some real sickies that have surfaced due to Natalee's case......I'd love to see the FACTS that this is based on......it just seems that it's ODD that this comes out when TES is preparing for a search.  I hope Debbie has checked to see where this person is posting from.

SunnyinTX,

As far as I know there have not been anymore posts from this person.  Debbie at BFN has asked that they contact her or the family.  So far nothing else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 04:31:22 PM
My focus is, and shall remain, on the main suspects until there is some concrete evidence other than blog rumor to look elsewhere.

Those suspects remain J2K and are the ones to this day named by KLPD as the prime suspects.  I think Joran van der Sloot, the two Kalpoes and Paulus are the ones responsible for whatever happened to Natalee as well as her subsequent disappearance.

I think most things that take the focus off those suspects are diversions as I have looked for over two years and can't make a contact to anybody who is not named as a suspect, including the other PIMPS named as suspects.

JMO

You have stated your opinion 1,000 times on LVR and it is noted. I also feel that JK2 and PVDS are the main suspect but I believe LVR is involved and I will always research every avenue I have with everyone and anyone who is involved with Natalees disappearance. I dont think LVR is disinformation and if anything they have tried to distance him from this case.MO

Well, then I certainly won't trouble you by stating my opinion again.  Sorry to have done so but thought we were all free to do that.  Evidently not. 

Why should you state your opinion but mine is 1,000 times?  I don't care who or what you research but would appreciate the right to my own opinions as well. 

But I will keep mine to myself in the future rather than have any more of your nasty remarks about mine.  Guess I can go crawl back under that rock you told me to, huh?

Since none of us know what happened to Natalee....I don't think anyone's opinion is to be negated...not matter how many times it's stated...I go from thinking that half of Aruba is involved to thinking....it's pj2k and cover up by people who owe paulus,  and anita's connections in the Netherlands..JMO..I wouldn't discount checking anyone out...but almost all we really have are our owns opinions based on the very FEW FACTS we have....and no one person's opinion is more important than anyone else's in my book.....

and please no crawling under rocks...all kinds of icky things can be found under rocks...bugs and snakes!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 04:32:46 PM
Have there been anymore postings from codebreaker?  I have mixed emotions about these posts.....If they are correct this person should be talking to the FBI and the IMMEDIATE family members.....if this is someone's idea of a joke...he/she is one sick individual...and we know there are some real sickies that have surfaced due to Natalee's case......I'd love to see the FACTS that this is based on......it just seems that it's ODD that this comes out when TES is preparing for a search.  I hope Debbie has checked to see where this person is posting from.

SunnyinTX,

As far as I know there have not been anymore posts from this person.  Debbie at BFN has asked that they contact her or the family.  So far nothing else.

thanks Truth....I don't read at BFN so thanks for the update.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 04:36:57 PM
Has anyone read this book??

“For Natalee … A Community of Love” is a 55-page book written by Donna M. Greene


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:39:11 PM

Since none of us know what happened to Natalee....I don't think anyone's opinion is to be negated...not matter how many times it's stated...I go from thinking that half of Aruba is involved to thinking....it's pj2k and cover up by people who owe paulus,  and anita's connections in the Netherlands..JMO..I wouldn't discount checking anyone out...but almost all we really have are our owns opinions based on the very FEW FACTS we have....and no one person's opinion is more important than anyone else's in my book.....

and please no crawling under rocks...all kinds of icky things can be found under rocks...bugs and snakes!!!

Just in case I carry this around with me to all the sites.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/shield.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:39:49 PM
Has anyone read this book??

“For Natalee … A Community of Love” is a 55-page book written by Donna M. Greene

No...where can we find a copy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:41:08 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 04:44:03 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


???  Isn't that dismembered?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:45:02 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


???  Isn't that dismembered?

If it happened to me that's what I would call it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:45:50 PM
Apparently codebreaker has emailed Debbie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 04:46:21 PM
Apparently codebreaker has emailed Debbie.

Yeah, just saw that. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 27, 2007, 04:51:46 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


???  Isn't that dismembered?

It is to me. :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 04:54:14 PM
I asked if the information had been shared with authorities.  Here's the response:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 11


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #692 on: Today at 03:54:39 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
truthseeker2:
with the family yes.
Authorities no.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 05:02:50 PM

Since none of us know what happened to Natalee....I don't think anyone's opinion is to be negated...not matter how many times it's stated...I go from thinking that half of Aruba is involved to thinking....it's pj2k and cover up by people who owe paulus,  and anita's connections in the Netherlands..JMO..I wouldn't discount checking anyone out...but almost all we really have are our owns opinions based on the very FEW FACTS we have....and no one person's opinion is more important than anyone else's in my book.....

and please no crawling under rocks...all kinds of icky things can be found under rocks...bugs and snakes!!!

Just in case I carry this around with me to all the sites.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/shield.jpg)

What ever that is I want one!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 05:04:37 PM
Has anyone read this book??

“For Natalee … A Community of Love” is a 55-page book written by Donna M. Greene

No...where can we find a copy?

I am not sure....a friend emailed me and asked me if I had read it....I had no knowledge of it...so I thought I'd ask here....I search and see if I can find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 05:06:15 PM
(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/aug%2026/hos%20spaans%20lagoen/hos%20spaans%20lagoen.jpg)

Water spout in Aruba yesterday!  :shock:

Hos feroz pafo di rif serca di De Palm Island        
Sunday, 26 August 2007 

Diadomingo atardi Aruba a nota precencia di diferente hos specialmente na nos costanan. Esaki a causa bastante panico den e comunidad cu e miedo cu esaki lo dal riba tera. Riba e imagen aki por mira un di e hosnan net patras di e rif patras di De Palm Island. Click read more pa mira e imagen mas grandi.

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/1950/5/

 


was this near any of the suspected dumping grounds?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 05:06:15 PM
Apparently codebreaker has emailed Debbie.

And??????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 05:07:33 PM

Since none of us know what happened to Natalee....I don't think anyone's opinion is to be negated...not matter how many times it's stated...I go from thinking that half of Aruba is involved to thinking....it's pj2k and cover up by people who owe paulus,  and anita's connections in the Netherlands..JMO..I wouldn't discount checking anyone out...but almost all we really have are our owns opinions based on the very FEW FACTS we have....and no one person's opinion is more important than anyone else's in my book.....

and please no crawling under rocks...all kinds of icky things can be found under rocks...bugs and snakes!!!

Just in case I carry this around with me to all the sites.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/shield.jpg)

What ever that is I want one!  LOL

lol.  it's my shield!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 05:10:39 PM

I am posting this here becaue this is what I THINK happened to Natalee...Klaas please move it if you think it belongs someplace else.....



A coroner's inquest into the 2002 death of Dianne Brimble on board the P&O liner Pacific Sky has shocked Australia with its graphic descriptions of her treatment by a group of men she met on board. The inquest has heard that Brimble, 42, died of an overdose of gamma hydroxybutyrate, a "date rape" drug also known as fantasy, mixed with a high blood alcohol level.
 http://www.cruisebruise.com/Dianne_Brimble.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 05:13:38 PM

Since none of us know what happened to Natalee....I don't think anyone's opinion is to be negated...not matter how many times it's stated...I go from thinking that half of Aruba is involved to thinking....it's pj2k and cover up by people who owe paulus,  and anita's connections in the Netherlands..JMO..I wouldn't discount checking anyone out...but almost all we really have are our owns opinions based on the very FEW FACTS we have....and no one person's opinion is more important than anyone else's in my book.....

and please no crawling under rocks...all kinds of icky things can be found under rocks...bugs and snakes!!!

Just in case I carry this around with me to all the sites.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/shield.jpg)

What ever that is I want one!  LOL

lol.  it's my shield!

LOL...OK...I do need one for sure!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 05:15:55 PM
Has anyone read this book??

“For Natalee … A Community of Love” is a 55-page book written by Donna M. Greene

No...where can we find a copy?

http://www.amazon.com/Natalee-Holloway-Case-Isaac-Chin/dp/1893846679

Red also  had a front page on it...I don't know how I missed it...except it was during the time I was moving....


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/06/25/a-new-book-for-natalee-holloway-a-community-of-love-by-donna-m-greene/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 27, 2007, 05:17:54 PM
Has anyone read this book??

“For Natalee … A Community of Love” is a 55-page book written by Donna M. Greene

No...where can we find a copy?

http://www.amazon.com/Natalee-Holloway-Case-Isaac-Chin/dp/1893846679

Red also  had a front page on it...I don't know how I missed it...except it was during the time I was moving....


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/06/25/a-new-book-for-natalee-holloway-a-community-of-love-by-donna-m-greene/

Thanks!  I'll have to get a copy of that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 27, 2007, 05:30:29 PM
WOW.....codebreaker was at BFN, I asked a question and got BLASTED for it   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on August 27, 2007, 05:37:25 PM
I am curious if this "codebreaker" is on Aruba. I hope they are telling the truth about contacting the family with the info. Can't say that I would blame them for not telling the ALE. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 05:41:57 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


???  Isn't that dismembered?

if not, then I have no clue what is


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 05:43:49 PM
maybe in Aruba, if you dismember a body to conceal the identity then it is really dismemberment.  Cuz yanno, its ok if it was for the purpose to cover up your crimes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 05:44:42 PM
^^^ is NOT really dismemberment


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on August 27, 2007, 05:54:19 PM
Does anyone think this codebreaker could be Deepak?  It is just interesting that they have another continuance in the court case-maybe he feels he will get his money (maybe pressure is being applied to pay) sooner if he proves he didn't kill and hide her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 27, 2007, 05:56:10 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


???  Isn't that dismembered?

if not, then I have no clue what is

http://www.m-w.com/medical/dismember
dismember
One entry found for dismember.
Main Entry: dis·mem·ber
Pronunciation: (primarystress)dis-primarystressmem-bschwar
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): dis·mem·bered; dis·mem·ber·ing /-b(schwa-)rieng/
: to cut off or disjoin the limbs, members, or parts of
- dis·mem·ber·ment /-bschwar-mschwant/ noun

No disrespect toward Natalee intended. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 06:05:00 PM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


???  Isn't that dismembered?

if not, then I have no clue what is

http://www.m-w.com/medical/dismember
dismember
One entry found for dismember.
Main Entry: dis·mem·ber
Pronunciation: (primarystress)dis-primarystressmem-bschwar
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): dis·mem·bered; dis·mem·ber·ing /-b(schwa-)rieng/
: to cut off or disjoin the limbs, members, or parts of
- dis·mem·ber·ment /-bschwar-mschwant/ noun

No disrespect toward Natalee intended. 

but you didnt use the Aruban dictionary  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 27, 2007, 06:11:22 PM
I hate to say this, but I have a Lorenzo question.  Why did the possibility of him being Joran's half brother, even get mentioned.  I understand how it got mentioned, but why??  If it is true, would this prevent Lorenzo from testifying against Joran (or visa versa), since they are "brothers"??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 06:15:48 PM
Does anyone think this codebreaker could be Deepak?  It is just interesting that they have another continuance in the court case-maybe he feels he will get his money (maybe pressure is being applied to pay) sooner if he proves he didn't kill and hide her.

hi Blue Moon.....I don't think so..don't ask me why...casue I can't give you an answer other than...I just don't think so.....I am beginning to think it's just another sicko...and I hope I am wrong....truth said codebreaker had emailed Debbie...so I am sure she will get some info as to whether this person is a nut or not


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 27, 2007, 06:25:18 PM
I hate to say this, but I have a Lorenzo question.  Why did the possibility of him being Joran's half brother, even get mentioned.  I understand how it got mentioned, but why??  If it is true, would this prevent Lorenzo from testifying against Joran (or visa versa), since they are "brothers"??

Hummm that is a good thought Buckeye.  I wonder if they are related at all now.  Could they be cousins.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 06:33:14 PM
I hate to say this, but I have a Lorenzo question.  Why did the possibility of him being Joran's half brother, even get mentioned.  I understand how it got mentioned, but why??  If it is true, would this prevent Lorenzo from testifying against Joran (or visa versa), since they are "brothers"??

Buckeye - good question and I don't have the answer. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on August 27, 2007, 06:35:17 PM
Thought this article was interesting concerning Natalee's disappearance and parents concern about their children being abducted/murdered that they would now consider life insurance for them.

 http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/8/prweb270657.htm

This article came out in August 2005.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 06:41:09 PM
I hate to say this, but I have a Lorenzo question.  Why did the possibility of him being Joran's half brother, even get mentioned.  I understand how it got mentioned, but why??  If it is true, would this prevent Lorenzo from testifying against Joran (or visa versa), since they are "brothers"??

I wonder what size shoe he wears,  Anna - any idea?




 :smt082


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 06:42:08 PM
WHOA - NOBODY MOVE.  DONT DO ANYTHING!!!!


I can see my avatar  :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 06:43:52 PM
DOH!  :2doh:

And just like that, it is gone again  :smt093


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 06:47:28 PM
FYI - This is posted by Ghost Writer at RU - the same Ghost Writer that posts at BFN.  Now, I just did a SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX search myself, plus an LDS search and I'm not finding anything on Natalee Holloway. 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE GAMES THESE PEOPLE PLAY!




Ghost Writer Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:48 pm    
Quote
And What The Hell Is This About?

In between my writing I do some genealogical work on the side. This morning I was working on a file and was in the SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX and I decided to do a search of "Natalee Holloway".

I was surprised when I received TWO hits:


Exact Search Results - All Records
You searched for Natalee Holloway Refine your search indicates Subscription required Sign Up!

Birth, Marriage, & Death Records 2

2 United States Obituary Collection

Family Trees

Ancestry World Tree entries for Natalee Holloway


You are here: All Search Results


When I hit the US OBITUARY COLLECTION link, I was shocked to see the other name that popped up with a search on her name.

Exact Search Results - United States Obituary Collection
You searched for Natalee Holloway Refine your search


All Results Viewing 1-2 of 2


View Record Name of Deceased Age at Death Birth Date Death Date Other Name Mentioned Newspaper Location View Obit

View Record

Preview
Name of Deceased:Steve Gregory Croes
Obituary Publication Date: 22 Jun 2005

There's more to see
Newspaper Title Newspaper Location
Sign up now


Steve Gregory Croes city, FL, Us
View Record

Preview
Name of Deceased: Natalee Holloway
Obituary Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006

There's more to see
Newspaper Title Newspaper Location
Sign up now


Natalee Holloway city, OH, Us
View Record

Am I the only one that finds this more than odd?

And then if you are a subscriber you can get the additional info:


Name of Deceased: Judge
Newspaper Title: Bradenton Herald
Newspaper Location: Bradenton, FL, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 19 Jun 2005
Locations Mentioned in Obituary: Mountain Brook, AL
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: Natalee Holloway; Beth Holloway Twitty; Deepak Kalpoe; Holloway Twitty; Judge Bob Wit; Satish Kalpoe
Source Citation: Newspaper: Bradenton Herald; Publication Date: 19 Jun 2005; Publication Place: Bradenton , FL , Us..


Name of Deceased: Steve Gregory Croes
Newspaper Title: Bradenton Herald
Newspaper Location: Bradenton, FL, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 22 Jun 2005
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: Natalee Holloway; Deepak Kalpoe; Marcus Wiggins; Satish Kalpoe; Peter Press
Source Citation: Newspaper: Bradenton Herald; Publication Date: 22 Jun 2005; Publication Place: Bradenton , FL , Us..


Name of Deceased: Natalee Holloway
Newspaper Title: Times Journal, The
Newspaper Location: Jackson, OH, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006
Locations Mentioned in Obituary: Kevin
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: AL Gore
Source Citation: Newspaper: Times Journal, The; Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006; Publication Place: Jackson , OH , Us..

now who the f*** would enter that information?

(i'm trying to find the time to try to track it down in the newspapers listed)

btw -- i have no idea who this "Judge" character is supposed to be.

just found this interesting.   






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 06:50:32 PM
Has his own boat, I had mentioned him previously.
But, they did bring him in twice, searched his boat, his house, his car and no forensics.
This is a little more complicated than I can fully explain here, let's just say it has always bothered me why they didn't question him like they questioned Joran, and leave it at that for the moment, OK?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 16, 2005 10:07:43 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 06:56:59 PM
Does anyone think this codebreaker could be Deepak?  It is just interesting that they have another continuance in the court case-maybe he feels he will get his money (maybe pressure is being applied to pay) sooner if he proves he didn't kill and hide her.


I am going to say no. I do not think he knows where she is now. I believe he was involved up to a point, but I do not think either he or Satish know where she is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 07:01:38 PM
I hate to say this, but I have a Lorenzo question.  Why did the possibility of him being Joran's half brother, even get mentioned.  I understand how it got mentioned, but why??  If it is true, would this prevent Lorenzo from testifying against Joran (or visa versa), since they are "brothers"??

Hummm that is a good thought Buckeye.  I wonder if they are related at all now.  Could they be cousins.


Aren't they all?? (http://bestsmileys.com/lol/10.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on August 27, 2007, 07:18:33 PM
Name of Deceased: Natalee Holloway
Newspaper Title: Times Journal, The
Newspaper Location: Jackson, OH, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006
Locations Mentioned in Obituary: Kevin
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: AL Gore
Source Citation: Newspaper: Times Journal, The; Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006; Publication Place: Jackson , OH , Us..


Klaas the above is on ancestry.com in the US Obituary Collection. Plain to see it is a farce. I am contacting ancestry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 07:21:02 PM
Name of Deceased: Natalee Holloway
Newspaper Title: Times Journal, The
Newspaper Location: Jackson, OH, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006
Locations Mentioned in Obituary: Kevin
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: AL Gore
Source Citation: Newspaper: Times Journal, The; Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006; Publication Place: Jackson , OH , Us..


Klaas the above is on ancestry.com in the US Obituary Collection. Plain to see it is a farce. I am contacting ancestry.

Why is it not there when I do a search?  I agree it's a farce but I don't even find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 07:22:39 PM
Has his own boat, I had mentioned him previously.
But, they did bring him in twice, searched his boat, his house, his car and no forensics.
This is a little more complicated than I can fully explain here, let's just say it has always bothered me why they didn't question him like they questioned Joran, and leave it at that for the moment, OK?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 16, 2005 10:07:43 PM


Why did Scuba think they should question LVR like they did Joran??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 07:26:49 PM
Has his own boat, I had mentioned him previously.
But, they did bring him in twice, searched his boat, his house, his car and no forensics.
This is a little more complicated than I can fully explain here, let's just say it has always bothered me why they didn't question him like they questioned Joran, and leave it at that for the moment, OK?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 16, 2005 10:07:43 PM


Why did Scuba think they should question LVR like they did Joran??

maybe because they prcticed his story so much and never got a chance to tell it?
 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 07:27:00 PM
FYI - that Codebreaker person has emailed Debbie at BFN and it appears that Codebreaker has NO inside information at all.  Codebreaker put together their theory based upon all the same information PV's etc we have all seen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 27, 2007, 07:27:33 PM
Name of Deceased: Natalee Holloway
Newspaper Title: Times Journal, The
Newspaper Location: Jackson, OH, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006
Locations Mentioned in Obituary: Kevin
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: AL Gore
Source Citation: Newspaper: Times Journal, The; Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006; Publication Place: Jackson , OH , Us..


Klaas the above is on ancestry.com in the US Obituary Collection. Plain to see it is a farce. I am contacting ancestry.

Why is it not there when I do a search?  I agree it's a farce but I don't even find it.

I got the same result as yapperz1. I also got the Steve Gregory Croes record.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 07:28:18 PM
Has his own boat, I had mentioned him previously.
But, they did bring him in twice, searched his boat, his house, his car and no forensics.
This is a little more complicated than I can fully explain here, let's just say it has always bothered me why they didn't question him like they questioned Joran, and leave it at that for the moment, OK?
Posted by: scubajap | Oct 16, 2005 10:07:43 PM


Why did Scuba think they should question LVR like they did Joran??

Because Scuba and others knew about Lorenzo's parties. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 07:30:28 PM

Why did Scuba think they should question LVR like they did Joran??

maybe because they prcticed his story so much and never got a chance to tell it?
 :lol:

ROFL!! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 07:35:01 PM
Name of Deceased: Natalee Holloway
Newspaper Title: Times Journal, The
Newspaper Location: Jackson, OH, Us
Obituary Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006
Locations Mentioned in Obituary: Kevin
Other Persons Mentioned in Obituary: AL Gore
Source Citation: Newspaper: Times Journal, The; Publication Date: 6 Aug 2006; Publication Place: Jackson , OH , Us..


Klaas the above is on ancestry.com in the US Obituary Collection. Plain to see it is a farce. I am contacting ancestry.

Why is it not there when I do a search?  I agree it's a farce but I don't even find it.

I got the same result as yapperz1. I also got the Steve Gregory Croes record.

Can you post the link please?  I don't know why it's not coming up for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on August 27, 2007, 07:39:08 PM
http://www.ancestry.com/

Just type in her name on the 1st page & born in USA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 07:42:58 PM
They just want you to pay for info they do not have. For instance, here is a search from Webcrawler with search words:
Bradenton Herald Publication Date 19 Jun 2005

Here is what is listed in search results
12.
Info about bradenton herald newspaper
Deceased:JudgeNewspaper Title:Bradenton Herald Newspaper Location:Bradenton, FL, USObituary Publication Date:Jun/19/2005Locations Mentioned in ...
www.uuhyhp.info/odpdirect/bradenton-herald-newspap... [Found on Ask.com]


It is all just 'search garbage'.......bot crap


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 07:43:00 PM
http://www.ancestry.com/

Just type in her name on the 1st page & born in USA

Geez - what is wrong with me, I was searching in the wrong spot.  Yes I'm very familiar with all the geneology sites just had a "blonde" moment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 27, 2007, 07:55:33 PM

Deleted..Anna I am here to find out what happened to Natalee and I will not be intimidated by you. Four times now in last few months you have attacked me for no reason..Please try to concentrate on Natalee..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Anna on August 27, 2007, 08:28:59 PM
If I have to support a certain theory because a moderator believes it, I will post elsewhere.  No where in my original post did I even mention Lorenzo or said moderator.  I said I prefer to concentrate on the known suspects and I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 08:37:03 PM
FYI - This is posted by Ghost Writer at RU - the same Ghost Writer that posts at BFN.  Now, I just did a SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX search myself, plus an LDS search and I'm not finding anything on Natalee Holloway. 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE GAMES THESE PEOPLE PLAY!


Well if you can't find it there...then it's  not there!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 08:39:14 PM
FYI - that Codebreaker person has emailed Debbie at BFN and it appears that Codebreaker has NO inside information at all.  Codebreaker put together their theory based upon all the same information PV's etc we have all seen.

thanks....how codebreaker got that terrible story out of the same PV's we saw is beyond me... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on August 27, 2007, 08:44:02 PM
FYI - This is posted by Ghost Writer at RU - the same Ghost Writer that posts at BFN.  Now, I just did a SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX search myself, plus an LDS search and I'm not finding anything on Natalee Holloway. 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE GAMES THESE PEOPLE PLAY!


Well if you can't find it there...then it's  not there!!!

If these people (RU) are playing around with records at Ancestry then I know I will not be renewing my subscription :sad: :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 08:46:16 PM
FYI - This is posted by Ghost Writer at RU - the same Ghost Writer that posts at BFN.  Now, I just did a SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX search myself, plus an LDS search and I'm not finding anything on Natalee Holloway. 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE GAMES THESE PEOPLE PLAY!


Well if you can't find it there...then it's  not there!!!

Actually I messed up and it is there, but it is completely bogus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 08:47:56 PM
If this Lorenzo guy was really a suspect in the Natalee case, why didnt they haul him in on drug/gun charges back then?  Why wait over 2 years? He was most likely into these things back then, they should have been able to use that as leverage. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 27, 2007, 08:48:16 PM
Lorenzo might be a drug addicted wacko.  At first, when it was so hard to find any info, even a picture of the guy, my gut instinct was undercover DEA (or perhaps the Dutch equivalent).  Then the arrest with his name spelled incorrectly.  Maybe a long term plan against the perps of his father's "suicide"?? Might explain the early Baccus comments. Hmmmm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 08:54:15 PM
If this Lorenzo guy was really a suspect in the Natalee case, why didnt they haul him in on drug/gun charges back then?  Why wait over 2 years? He was most likely into these things back then, they should have been able to use that as leverage. 

You aren't suggesting that they actually wanted to solve the case are you? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 27, 2007, 09:00:21 PM
If this Lorenzo guy was really a suspect in the Natalee case, why didnt they haul him in on drug/gun charges back then?  Why wait over 2 years? He was most likely into these things back then, they should have been able to use that as leverage. 

You aren't suggesting that they actually wanted to solve the case are you? 


yeah, silly me.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on August 27, 2007, 09:04:45 PM
FYI - that Codebreaker person has emailed Debbie at BFN and it appears that Codebreaker has NO inside information at all.  Codebreaker put together their theory based upon all the same information PV's etc we have all seen.

thanks....how codebreaker got that terrible story out of the same PV's we saw is beyond me... :roll:

I would also like to know how the information in Codebreaker's postings was obtained from the PVs we have read, including the marker and buoy numbers.  Far fetched hypothesis IMO and if not based on any known facts or actual involvement by the writer then it is incredibly cruel to the family.

Also the case of Dianne Brimble has been in our news for years now and having seen the suspects shown and interviewed (after a fashion) on local TV all I can say is that apart from the age differences it is so similar to Natalee's case in that the perpetrators have a don't care, don't want to know, attitude where the victim is blamed and the main comments have been "She got what she asked for" and "Her behaviour was the cause".  A totally anti-women outlook from all the men involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:16:27 PM
FYI - This is posted by Ghost Writer at RU - the same Ghost Writer that posts at BFN.  Now, I just did a SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX search myself, plus an LDS search and I'm not finding anything on Natalee Holloway. 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE GAMES THESE PEOPLE PLAY!


Well if you can't find it there...then it's  not there!!!

Actually I messed up and it is there, but it is completely bogus.


 Is there a full moon by chance?? Some wierd things going on.....codebreaker, this  thing and the other that I won't mention :roll:.....some people are just kinda whacked out!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 09:16:41 PM
Well I read while I was getting my hair done ... a Glamour magazine - from either July or August...  they did this story on a woman Janet Chandler from Michigan... the murder was solved 20 years later.  So it can happen here .....




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 09:19:50 PM
FYI - This is posted by Ghost Writer at RU - the same Ghost Writer that posts at BFN.  Now, I just did a SOCIAL SECURITY DEATH INDEX search myself, plus an LDS search and I'm not finding anything on Natalee Holloway. 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE GAMES THESE PEOPLE PLAY!


Well if you can't find it there...then it's  not there!!!

Actually I messed up and it is there, but it is completely bogus.


 Is there a full moon by chance?? Some wierd things going on.....codebreaker, this  thing and the other that I won't mention :roll:.....some people are just kinda whacked out!!

not going to hijack the thread... but I will make this comment.. funny how some people go out and help search for missing people... SUNNY, you - Marlee, DiHannah, IBE...

and others, well..... seem to care less.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:25:56 PM
FYI - that Codebreaker person has emailed Debbie at BFN and it appears that Codebreaker has NO inside information at all.  Codebreaker put together their theory based upon all the same information PV's etc we have all seen.

thanks....how codebreaker got that terrible story out of the same PV's we saw is beyond me... :roll:

I would also like to know how the information in Codebreaker's postings was obtained from the PVs we have read, including the marker and buoy numbers.  Far fetched hypothesis IMO and if not based on any known facts or actual involvement by the writer then it is incredibly cruel to the family.

Also the case of Dianne Brimble has been in our news for years now and having seen the suspects shown and interviewed (after a fashion) on local TV all I can say is that apart from the age differences it is so similar to Natalee's case in that the perpetrators have a don't care, don't want to know, attitude where the victim is blamed and the main comments have been "She got what she asked for" and "Her behaviour was the cause".  A totally anti-women outlook from all the men involved.

I read those PV's, as all of us did, over and over and over..hoping there was something there......there was no mention of the buoy's.....I got an email that contained the email he/she sent to Debbie...which she actually posted on BFN......this person is a whacko!! posting like he/she had insider information....damn!! imagine Natalee's family has gone through this type of thing over and over and over......(I didn't post the email here...I figure Klaas has also see the email and will post it if she deems is fitting)

I had heard of the Dianne Brimble case...but didn't remember a lot of the details...but after reading that site....I got a lot more detail than I wanted......but I did remember as you say...the resemblance to Natalee's case.....starting with the date rape drug.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:27:14 PM
Well I read while I was getting my hair done ... a Glamour magazine - from either July or August...  they did this story on a woman Janet Chandler from Michigan... the murder was solved 20 years later.  So it can happen here .....

Hi Mrs. Red!!  Yes it can....but I hope we do not have to wait that long!! :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 09:30:03 PM
Well I read while I was getting my hair done ... a Glamour magazine - from either July or August...  they did this story on a woman Janet Chandler from Michigan... the murder was solved 20 years later.  So it can happen here .....

Hi Mrs. Red!!  Yes it can....but I hope we do not have to wait that long!! :shock:

I absolutely hope we don't have to wait that long... that story about Janet Chandler was awful.... I will start a thread in another thread if I can find some more articles, etc. 


SO we have ruled out that Codebreaker is Deepak? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 09:30:10 PM
Just to put it at rest.  This is the copy of the email Debbie posted at BFN.  As you can see, Codebreaker has no inside information.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/CODEBREAKEREMAIL.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:31:04 PM


 Is there a full moon by chance?? Some wierd things going on.....codebreaker, this  thing and the other that I won't mention :roll:.....some people are just kinda whacked out!!

not going to hijack the thread... but I will make this comment.. funny how some people go out and help search for missing people... SUNNY, you - Marlee, DiHannah, IBE...

and others, well..... seem to care less.  :wink:

I know...sad, huh!  I wish I could start a TES branch here in MO......I know monkeys would be first in line....but knowing that if Tim/TES ever needs us, we will be here for him, will have to suffice for now. I put my Natalee poster in the rear window of my new car today.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 09:32:20 PM
that is wrong... just wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:33:12 PM
Well I read while I was getting my hair done ... a Glamour magazine - from either July or August...  they did this story on a woman Janet Chandler from Michigan... the murder was solved 20 years later.  So it can happen here .....

Hi Mrs. Red!!  Yes it can....but I hope we do not have to wait that long!! :shock:

I absolutely hope we don't have to wait that long... that story about Janet Chandler was awful.... I will start a thread in another thread if I can find some more articles, etc. 
SO we have ruled out that Codebreaker is Deepak? 

That would be great Mrs. Red.....

yes, I believe we can rule deepak out :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 09:35:16 PM
I posted to you in the musings thread SUNNY....

why is everyone so quiet> :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:35:27 PM
Just to put it at rest.  This is the copy of the email Debbie posted at BFN.  As you can see, Codebreaker has no inside information.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/CODEBREAKEREMAIL.jpg)

thanks Klaas....not only a whacko but a smart butt too.....see I didn't say A$$ :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:39:47 PM
I posted to you in the musings thread SUNNY....

why is everyone so quiet> :shock:

OK...I'll go check Musings...I don't know whay everyone is so quiet????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 27, 2007, 09:43:19 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.


Any word yet on this?  Seems like we're always in the wait and disapointment mode. We are all biting at the bit to help and do something, you'd think instead of teasers to keep us hanging on there would be something we could sink out teeth into.
Seems like all we get are extended promises.  I want so badly to help out but I have to admit all it seems is just "Something big is Coming" and it never comes. 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 27, 2007, 09:55:05 PM
Well in regards to code breaker, code talker, etc I knew I had read some of that over at Scr_x  Suc_s.
Full moon ? Yep .
Helo & TTL , multitasking : laundry, dinner, hairdo after work, overtime after a reg work day ! !  I am a human tornado today ! ! !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 27, 2007, 09:58:01 PM
An attempt at mediator here, never done this but this is bothering me.

Two of my favorite posters seem to have a burr against each other.  Not going to mention names - just going to pose the question, whats the real beef?  I just ask that you guys look to the most original-basic post that started this whole turmoil and look at it in a different light.  Could either of you misunderstood the other? Is there some ground for reconciliation in the name of finding justice for Natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 27, 2007, 09:58:02 PM
We are going to go get some custard!!  So night to all......take care and see ya tomorrow!!!  As Mrs. Red says...keep the faith!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:09:46 PM
the Dutch have not let this case go away

they could, but they have not.

this tells me everything i need to know



they do not want to BE LINKED to the scum ALE

would you ????

have a little faith - i do  :cool:

 :smt033 :smt033 :smt033 :smt033 :smt033


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:10:26 PM
please send cigars


its a LOCK  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 10:10:34 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_33831.php

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/ArubaWaterSpoutNatalee.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:11:51 PM
the DUTCH have no choice

if they dont

all hell breaks loose  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 10:12:56 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.


Any word yet on this?  Seems like we're always in the wait and disapointment mode. We are all biting at the bit to help and do something, you'd think instead of teasers to keep us hanging on there would be something we could sink out teeth into.
Seems like all we get are extended promises.  I want so badly to help out but I have to admit all it seems is just "Something big is Coming" and it never comes. 
 

AS RED stated, Paul Reynolds is going to be posting here... it will probably be next week... he like all of us, is busy.  I am sure he will be here though, because he contacted us....

and don't lose faith... TIM is searching for other missing people now in OH... read DiHannah's and Marlee's accounts on that....it's quite uplifting (or it was to me)
and just keep having faith that it will happen, because it will.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:15:04 PM
FYI Monkeys ...

As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.

We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.

However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.

This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.


Any word yet on this?  Seems like we're always in the wait and disapointment mode. We are all biting at the bit to help and do something, you'd think instead of teasers to keep us hanging on there would be something we could sink out teeth into.
Seems like all we get are extended promises.  I want so badly to help out but I have to admit all it seems is just "Something big is Coming" and it never comes. 
 

AS RED stated, Paul Reynolds is going to be posting here... it will probably be next week... he like all of us, is busy.  I am sure he will be here though, because he contacted us....

and don't lose faith... TIM is searching for other missing people now in OH... read DiHannah's and Marlee's accounts on that....it's quite uplifting (or it was to me)
and just keep having faith that it will happen, because it will.



:smt025 :smt033 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045 :cheers: :2waver: :smt023 :smt041 :2notworthy:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 27, 2007, 10:19:22 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_33831.php

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/ArubaWaterSpoutNatalee.jpg)


Wow......I like it (http://bestsmileys.com/angles/3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 27, 2007, 10:24:36 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_33831.php

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/ArubaWaterSpoutNatalee.jpg)


Wow......I like it (http://bestsmileys.com/angles/3.gif)

me too... it's quite powerful


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 27, 2007, 10:31:50 PM
its a LOCK  :cool:
:wink:

Maybe they found Sander's phone...

or Paulus' bag...

or Satish's gun...

or Freddy's camera...

or Joran's shoes...

or Deepak's chat records...

or v/d Straten's wiretaps...

or Anita's diary...

or Guido's cell records...

or the VDS's other maid...

or Osman Osman's invoices...

or...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 10:33:29 PM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 27, 2007, 10:35:56 PM
 :lol:  @  Locusts &  Sweatyrunningman


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 27, 2007, 10:38:49 PM
its a LOCK  :cool:
:wink:

Maybe they found Sander's phone...

or Paulus' bag...

or Satish's gun...

or Freddy's camera...

or Joran's shoes...

or Deepak's chat records...

or v/d Straten's wiretaps...

or Anita's diary...

or Guido's cell records...

or the VDS's other maid...

or Osman Osman's invoices...

or...

 :smt117 :salut:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:39:47 PM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)

he makes me want to WRETCH  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:44:36 PM



Maybe they found Sander's phone...

or Paulus' bag...

or Satish's gun...

or Freddy's camera...

or Joran's shoes...

or Deepak's chat records...

or v/d Straten's wiretaps...

or Anita's diary...

or Guido's cell records...

or the VDS's other maid...

or Osman Osman's invoices...

or...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:45:25 PM



Maybe they found Sander's phone...

or Paulus' bag...

or Satish's gun...

or Freddy's camera...

or Joran's shoes...

or Deepak's chat records...

or v/d Straten's wiretaps..

or Anita's diary...

or Guido's cell records...

or the VDS's other maid...

or Osman Osman's invoices...

or...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on August 27, 2007, 10:45:54 PM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)

he makes me want to WRETCH  :cool:

I agree with you on this and also on "It's a Lock".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 27, 2007, 10:46:00 PM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)

he makes me want to WRETCH  :cool:
I always liked "Mr. Humidity"  :wink: :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:48:12 PM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)

he makes me want to WRETCH  :cool:

I agree with you on this and also on "It's a Lock".



 :wink: :cool:

LOCK IT UP....errrrr  LOCK them UP  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 10:49:53 PM
There - that's better  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:50:09 PM
in the picture with paulus and the locusts


that is where Natalee is buried

on the land, in an area like that  :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 27, 2007, 10:51:32 PM
There - that's better  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust2.jpg)

Open wide and say ahh!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 27, 2007, 10:53:43 PM
Can anyone explain why Lalasmom was asking whether locusts (can't remember the other name used) were in Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 10:55:47 PM
in the picture with paulus and the locusts


that is where Natalee is buried

on the land, in an area like that  :shock:

Robots- I don't even think it's Aruba.  It's a photo with locusts I found that just happened to kindof look like Aruba  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 10:57:55 PM
Can anyone explain why Lalasmom was asking whether locusts (can't remember the other name used) were in Aruba?

Because I think they make noises that could have sounded like a monkey?  Just guessing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 27, 2007, 10:57:58 PM
in the picture with paulus and the locusts


that is where Natalee is buried

on the land, in an area like that  :shock:

Robots- I don't even think it's Aruba.  It's a photo with locusts I found that just happened to kindof look like Aruba  :wink:

well, thats the TYPE of area 
on the land, paulus was there. he was the conductor 
 :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 27, 2007, 10:59:17 PM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 27, 2007, 11:01:36 PM
Can anyone explain why Lalasmom was asking whether locusts (can't remember the other name used) were in Aruba?

Because I think they make noises that could have sounded like a monkey?  Just guessing.

My thoughts went that way, too, Initially,  but your picture brought the question back....thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:06:37 PM
San just asked me to do a compare.  The hairlines sure do match but what I notice also matches is around the mouth and chin:

PVDS and Lorenzo


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLorenzo.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 27, 2007, 11:08:23 PM
San just asked me to do a compare.  The hairlines sure do match but what I notice also matches is around the mouth and chin:

PVDS and Lorenzo


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLorenzo.jpg)

Thanks Klaas.  Sure do look alike.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 27, 2007, 11:12:41 PM
OT here.  I know people will leave once I post but,....I signed into diario chat this morning and they made fun of me (Natalee) being in Boca Mahos.  wonder what they know that we don't.  Sorry if margins blow.

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/ScreenHunter_035.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:15:22 PM
Hotshot -where is Boco Mahos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 27, 2007, 11:18:58 PM
Hotshot -where is Boco Mahos?
the north side by the natural bridge. 

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/ScreenHunter_037.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 27, 2007, 11:20:13 PM
Funny after that Bondia signed on, and I said "Hi Julia"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:20:15 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/ArubaBocaMahos.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:20:48 PM
Funny after that Bondia signed on, and I said "Hi Julia"

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:27:48 PM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

Igsigs - I remember reading it at RU.  So the posts are gone now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 27, 2007, 11:41:56 PM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

Igsigs - I remember reading it at RU.  So the posts are gone now?
Well Klaas, we all know alot of stuff is missing, and not only from the ALE drawers either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 27, 2007, 11:43:12 PM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

Igsigs - I remember reading it at RU.  So the posts are gone now?
The MF post was at FOB. Glenda's was and is at RU.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 27, 2007, 11:43:19 PM
OT here.  I know people will leave once I post but,....I signed into diario chat this morning and they made fun of me (Natalee) being in Boca Mahos.  wonder what they know that we don't.  Sorry if margins blow.

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/ScreenHunter_035.jpg)


This is too funny, boys or whatever they are, talk about a zwemdiploma (swimming certificate/diploma).

And want about this sense 'mot je naar school gaan'. This is not good Dutch. To funny. And btw. They try to talk Dutch and Papia, because the most people from none ABC island not speak or/and write Papia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 27, 2007, 11:52:59 PM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

Igsigs - I remember reading it at RU.  So the posts are gone now?
The MF post was at FOB. Glenda's was and is at RU.

I searched for Glenda's at RU and couldn't find it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 27, 2007, 11:55:31 PM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

In Joran's book on 6-3 or 6-4 it is quite clear that PVDS was calling JVS often and when there was a report that NH was found Anita called her best friend to get the specifics. Would be very interesting to know what was talked about and who Anitas best friend is. Also makes me wonder how they could report in the paper that NH was dead when it was actually a 17 year old male.

Speaking of Rudy,I thought today about the arrest warrants that were put out and the issues regarding work permits in Aruba.. Rudy was more interested in getting TJ Ward off the island then letting him get answers for the family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 12:02:03 AM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

In Joran's book on 6-3 or 6-4 it is quite clear that PVDS was calling JVS often and when there was a report that NH was found Anita called her best friend to get the specifics. Would be very interesting to know what was talked about and who Anitas best friend is. Also makes me wonder how they could report in the paper that NH was dead when it was actually a 17 year old male.

Speaking of Rudy,I thought today about the arrest warrants that were put out and the issues regarding work permits in Aruba.. Rudy was more interested in getting TJ Ward off the island then letting him get answers for the family.

Was Anita calling Van der Straaten's wife.  Was Van der Straaten relaying information through his wife.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 12:03:22 AM
I searched for Glenda's at RU and couldn't find it. 
I ran across it last night...lemme look.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 28, 2007, 12:27:34 AM
V/D Straten Wiretaps

MF's post is gone, maybe somebody saved it, but IIRC he said that Rudy ripped v/d Straten on the radio and mentioned wiretaps. Glenda also posted about it...saying that the radio report stated that v/d Straten was investigated for his phone activity *before* the arrest of J2K. Even said it was an issue on 6/3 - 6/4 when Dompig replaced him for a day or two. Hard to tell what is true or not, coming from those two sources...but i am surprised the story was never covered in print. That i know of.

In Joran's book on 6-3 or 6-4 it is quite clear that PVDS was calling JVS often and when there was a report that NH was found Anita called her best friend to get the specifics. Would be very interesting to know what was talked about and who Anitas best friend is. Also makes me wonder how they could report in the paper that NH was dead when it was actually a 17 year old male.

Speaking of Rudy,I thought today about the arrest warrants that were put out and the issues regarding work permits in Aruba.. Rudy was more interested in getting TJ Ward off the island then letting him get answers for the family.

Was Anita calling Van der Straaten's wife.  Was Van der Straaten relaying information through his wife.

Hiya San  :D...I would have to look through the translations again..I dont think so..Because that same day in the book PVDS was calling Jan and Anita was calling her Best Friend as joran described her. As I recall they said Natalee was found and Anita was calling to find out more... I think it was 6-3 to 6-5-05..The date on this article is 6-7 saying NH is dead as it may be what they were looking into.

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/aruba_20paper.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 12:32:18 AM
I searched for Glenda's at RU and couldn't find it. 
I ran across it last night...lemme look.
I found both the Glenda and MF posts. I e-mailed them to you. I don't want to just post links...and you know my c/p issues.  :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 12:51:06 AM
I searched for Glenda's at RU and couldn't find it. 
I ran across it last night...lemme look.
I found both the Glenda and MF posts. I e-mailed them to you. I don't want to just post links...and you know my c/p issues.  :-x

ok  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 12:58:06 AM
Thanks Igsigs!

Here is Glenda's post at RU:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/GlendaWiretaps.png)

Here is MF's post as copied by hubba at RU:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/MFfobWiretaps.png)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 28, 2007, 01:44:11 AM
codebreaker just showed up at BFN:

codebreaker
Newbie

Posts: 9


    Re: OPEN DISCUSSION - NATALEE - AUG. 2007
« Reply #689 on: Today at 03:41:57 PM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ju Ju:
I never said she was dismembered, her hands, were removed,
and her head also, I believe this was Identity reasons only.
 


 :shock:  Sounds like dismemberent to me  IMO..   Yikes
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 28, 2007, 01:53:26 AM
please send cigars


its a LOCK  :cool:

 :cool:  honey you have cigars waiting for yah  lol  You and Wreck both and any others who want them.
 The humidor at work is keeping them safe for ya'll.   :wink:
 Robots.. if you are correct in your thoughs of KLPD.. I swear.. I'll smoke a cigar too. even if it means turning green and being ill.   :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 28, 2007, 01:55:50 AM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)


 :shock:  Eweeeeeeeeeeeeee   Locusts and PVDS..  Ackkkkkkkkkkkkkkk     :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 28, 2007, 05:26:26 AM
  Truthseeker2 Reading back, I've been looking for a statement Nadira made in which she said Satish hardly ever or never went out with Deepak. That same satatement said he was pacing about, excited, waiting for Deepak to come home.  This contradicted everything else we were told about him picking Deepak up from work that night.
   According to Sander's 6/16 PV he has known the Kalpoes a year and a half, and Koen goes to the movies with them.  Andre Santos PV says he has known Joran 6 years, Satish 2 and Deepak 1 year.
    I've been comparing the Kapoes' 5/31 PVs and until we get to the security guards their stories don't match. Their account of the guards is practically word for word, but details at C&C's totally different.  Deepak's account matches Joran's 6/9 PV, the first we have seen from him. Within 48 hours the brothers' stories don't match. Why?  Is it at all possible that Satish wasn't with Joran and Satish that night?
     


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 28, 2007, 05:43:01 AM
A few pages back, there were several comments about an ancestry search producing an obituary-type notice about Natalee.

I recall that a newspaper in the U.S. - I think it was in Florida, and possibly a weekly - ran a front page obituary, with a photo of Natalee, after the "something bad happened" statement (June 10-11 2005 weekend). It came up on searches (Google) for a long time.

That might be the explanation. (Doesn't explain the Croes result, though.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 08:47:56 AM
please send cigars


its a LOCK  :cool:

 :cool:  honey you have cigars waiting for yah  lol  You and Wreck both and any others who want them.
 The humidor at work is keeping them safe for ya'll.   :wink:
 Robots.. if you are correct in your thoughs of KLPD.. I swear.. I'll smoke a cigar too. even if it means turning green and being ill.   :cool:

its a DEAL  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 08:51:18 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_33831.php

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/ArubaWaterSpoutNatalee.jpg)

Good Morning Monks!!!  WOW Klaas... ...this took my breath away!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 08:56:51 AM
The locusts are next  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/PVDSLocust.jpg)

HOLEY MOLEY!!! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 08:57:01 AM
Can anyone explain why Lalasmom was asking whether locusts (can't remember the other name used) were in Aruba?


I think is was cicada bugs and I don't remember why she mentioned them.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&resnum=0&q=cicada+bugs&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

http://bug.cicadayear.com/article.aspx?pageId=58


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 09:01:39 AM
OT here.  I know people will leave once I post but,....I signed into diario chat this morning and they made fun of me (Natalee) being in Boca Mahos.  wonder what they know that we don't.  Sorry if margins blow.

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/ScreenHunter_035.jpg)

Good Morning HotShot!!  uummmm this is certainly interesting....where is Boca Mahos on the island map???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 09:02:51 AM
Funny after that Bondia signed on, and I said "Hi Julia"

hahahahahaha...did she respond?    Someone sure shut her up...wonder WHO??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:52:42 AM
  Truthseeker2 Reading back, I've been looking for a statement Nadira made in which she said Satish hardly ever or never went out with Deepak. That same satatement said he was pacing about, excited, waiting for Deepak to come home.  This contradicted everything else we were told about him picking Deepak up from work that night.
   According to Sander's 6/16 PV he has known the Kalpoes a year and a half, and Koen goes to the movies with them.  Andre Santos PV says he has known Joran 6 years, Satish 2 and Deepak 1 year.
    I've been comparing the Kapoes' 5/31 PVs and until we get to the security guards their stories don't match. Their account of the guards is practically word for word, but details at C&C's totally different.  Deepak's account matches Joran's 6/9 PV, the first we have seen from him. Within 48 hours the brothers' stories don't match. Why?  Is it at all possible that Satish wasn't with Joran and Satish that night?
     

Welcome MUM!  Good observations!  So who do you think if not Satish? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 10:10:11 AM
Hi Mum, and welcome!

I agree with Klaas, your observations are very interesting. I don't recall if we ever tried to freeze frame the video of the car leaving C&C's, and know that the quality of the video is poor. Your post has made me curious as to whether Satish could be seen in the car even at that point.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 28, 2007, 10:13:09 AM
Thanks Klaas,  FREDDY HAS TO TELL THE TRUTH!   Been wondering if he's the 5th suspect whose alibi can't be broken.  The gardner didn't recognize Satish and it appears Paulus and Joran have something on him, gun or a car incident.  Joran changed to Satish picked him up.  And to top it off the Kalpoe stepfather winds up with the Internet Cafe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 28, 2007, 10:20:30 AM
Thanks CBB, Could the MB kids have had a really good look at whoever was with Joran at C&Cs?  It was probably dark in there, late and they were partying. The 3 were only ther 20-30 minutes tops.  Just because Joran says it was Satish doesn't make it so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:20:44 AM
Thanks Klaas,  FREDDY HAS TO TELL THE TRUTH!   Been wondering if he's the 5th suspect whose alibi can't be broken.  The gardner didn't recognize Satish and it appears Paulus and Joran have something on him, gun or a car incident.  Joran changed to Satish picked him up.  And to top it off the Kalpoe stepfather winds up with the Internet Cafe.

Freddy would be the more likely partner.  We have a photo of Joran, Freddy and Deepak from March/April 2005 in front of CnC.  It was Freddy, Deepak and Joran that picked up Bailey Ann and her friend on their last night in Aruba.  So Freddy does make more sense than Satish.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:27:49 AM
Thanks Klaas,  FREDDY HAS TO TELL THE TRUTH!   Been wondering if he's the 5th suspect whose alibi can't be broken.  The gardner didn't recognize Satish and it appears Paulus and Joran have something on him, gun or a car incident.  Joran changed to Satish picked him up.  And to top it off the Kalpoe stepfather winds up with the Internet Cafe.

Freddy would be the more likely partner.  We have a photo of Joran, Freddy and Deepak from March/April 2005 in front of CnC.  It was Freddy, Deepak and Joran that picked up Bailey Ann and her friend on their last night in Aruba.  So Freddy does make more sense than Satish.

Was it a repeat of this night? 

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/freddy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 10:34:22 AM
http://video.aol.com/video/news-dutch-show-hopes-to-solve-holloway-case/1492540

I was just looking through some videos. You guys have seen this, but it shows a car reported to be Deepak's being loaded for impounding at approx. 1:10 minutes into the video. It has 6 spokes on the tire rims. There's been some speculation about the car, and thought I'd post it for anyone interested.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 10:40:01 AM
  Truthseeker2 Reading back, I've been looking for a statement Nadira made in which she said Satish hardly ever or never went out with Deepak. That same satatement said he was pacing about, excited, waiting for Deepak to come home.  This contradicted everything else we were told about him picking Deepak up from work that night.
   According to Sander's 6/16 PV he has known the Kalpoes a year and a half, and Koen goes to the movies with them.  Andre Santos PV says he has known Joran 6 years, Satish 2 and Deepak 1 year.
    I've been comparing the Kapoes' 5/31 PVs and until we get to the security guards their stories don't match. Their account of the guards is practically word for word, but details at C&C's totally different.  Deepak's account matches Joran's 6/9 PV, the first we have seen from him. Within 48 hours the brothers' stories don't match. Why?  Is it at all possible that Satish wasn't with Joran and Satish that night?
     

I don't think there is any doubt that Satish was with them on the night of 05/29 and early morning of 05/30.  But...trying to keep an open mind...could it have actually been Freddie that was with them instead of Satish and that is why Deepak has been so protective of Satish?  Freddie wasn't id'd so Satish was the one picked up.  ??????

I have seen a few discrepancies in the early stories based on the PV's, such as the one where Deepak says that Satish drove to CnC's and Deepak left the bar looking for J&S but did not find them at the car.  Deepak then says he sat down at the rear of the car and mis-called Satish.  Satish then comes out and gives Deepak the keys and returns to CnC's to get Joran.  This was only told one time.  Every other time it appears Deepak drives them to CnC's.  Is it significant?  I don't know.  Maybe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 10:42:34 AM
Thanks CBB, Could the MB kids have had a really good look at whoever was with Joran at C&Cs?  It was probably dark in there, late and they were partying. The 3 were only ther 20-30 minutes tops.  Just because Joran says it was Satish doesn't make it so.

So who was it?  I am assuming you think it was Freddy. Didn't Satish or Deepak speak to someone there? If that is true then surely there is a statement some where to that effect...probably not.  I have often wondered if Satish was really there at all.  His witness statement (that we now know is false) is clearly at odds with the details that Deepak and Joran give in theirs.  Of course, we will never see the Joran witness statement, since it's long since gone.  Please continue...I am interested. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 10:50:17 AM
  Truthseeker2 Reading back, I've been looking for a statement Nadira made in which she said Satish hardly ever or never went out with Deepak. That same satatement said he was pacing about, excited, waiting for Deepak to come home.  This contradicted everything else we were told about him picking Deepak up from work that night.
   According to Sander's 6/16 PV he has known the Kalpoes a year and a half, and Koen goes to the movies with them.  Andre Santos PV says he has known Joran 6 years, Satish 2 and Deepak 1 year.
    I've been comparing the Kapoes' 5/31 PVs and until we get to the security guards their stories don't match. Their account of the guards is practically word for word, but details at C&C's totally different.  Deepak's account matches Joran's 6/9 PV, the first we have seen from him. Within 48 hours the brothers' stories don't match. Why?  Is it at all possible that Satish wasn't with Joran and Satish that night?
     

Good Morning MUM and welcome to SM.....I do believe it has been established that satish was with deepak and the sporter...as to why their stories don't match....just stupid I guess...I doubt either of them are too bright considering all we know.... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 10:51:51 AM
A few pages back, there were several comments about an ancestry search producing an obituary-type notice about Natalee.

I recall that a newspaper in the U.S. - I think it was in Florida, and possibly a weekly - ran a front page obituary, with a photo of Natalee, after the "something bad happened" statement (June 10-11 2005 weekend). It came up on searches (Google) for a long time.

That might be the explanation. (Doesn't explain the Croes result, though.)

Good Morning Msmarple...I never saw that...do you have it saved? can you post it here....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:52:42 AM
Sunny - but the question is, how was it established that Satish was with them?  From their own statements? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 10:53:50 AM
Thanks CBB, Could the MB kids have had a really good look at whoever was with Joran at C&Cs?  It was probably dark in there, late and they were partying. The 3 were only ther 20-30 minutes tops.  Just because Joran says it was Satish doesn't make it so.

WOW....now you have me wondering of it really was Satish or NOT!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 10:57:47 AM
Sunny - but the question is, how was it established that Satish was with them?  From their own statements? 


Got it now :shock:....and as far as I can remember ...it is from their statments...and yes it would make more sense that it was freddy and not satish with them that night....was it freddy who was supposed to be spending the night??  I gotta go find my notes...someplace in a box still


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 28, 2007, 11:06:28 AM
A few pages back, there were several comments about an ancestry search producing an obituary-type notice about Natalee.

I recall that a newspaper in the U.S. - I think it was in Florida, and possibly a weekly - ran a front page obituary, with a photo of Natalee, after the "something bad happened" statement (June 10-11 2005 weekend). It came up on searches (Google) for a long time.

That might be the explanation. (Doesn't explain the Croes result, though.)

Good Morning Msmarple...I never saw that...do you have it saved? can you post it here....

Sunny - I didn't save it. It probably was posted at SM around that time, though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 28, 2007, 11:09:19 AM
Thanks CBB, Could the MB kids have had a really good look at whoever was with Joran at C&Cs?  It was probably dark in there, late and they were partying. The 3 were only ther 20-30 minutes tops.  Just because Joran says it was Satish doesn't make it so.

WOW....now you have me wondering of it really was Satish or NOT!!

Yep I am wondering too.  Deepak, Satish and Freddy all have dark coloring, probably close to the same height and weight, especially when they are only seen for a short time, It would be easy to assume.......  Very interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 11:13:22 AM
Morning Monkeys! Very interesting discussion regarding whether it was Satish or Freddy with Joran at CnC's. Freddy and Satish look similar IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:17:02 AM
I think the notion that Satish wasn't there at all is plausible. I've been going through videos, looking for the car video leaving C&C's and man, it's a gut wrencher to see the interviews agian of what the family has been through!

I wish Beth could have had this conversation with Satish. I think he's the weakest link in the chain of information, and whether he was there or not, Satish knows what happened, IMO.

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=1111290889&fr=yfp-t-501


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 28, 2007, 11:17:32 AM
Thanks for the welcome Sunny.  Lala's, Deepak's statement 5/31 says he talked to a friend, Satish says he, meaning Satish, walked aroundand Joron and Deepak lagged behind and doesn't mention a friend. Maybe Paul Reynolds will be able to clue us in on what is fact or fiction.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 11:23:32 AM
http://video.aol.com/video/news-dutch-show-hopes-to-solve-holloway-case/1492540

I was just looking through some videos. You guys have seen this, but it shows a car reported to be Deepak's being loaded for impounding at approx. 1:10 minutes into the video. It has 6 spokes on the tire rims. There's been some speculation about the car, and thought I'd post it for anyone interested.

thanks CBB....I remember the video.....I have lots of questions about the car....but like so many other things...no answers


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 11:24:41 AM
A few pages back, there were several comments about an ancestry search producing an obituary-type notice about Natalee.

I recall that a newspaper in the U.S. - I think it was in Florida, and possibly a weekly - ran a front page obituary, with a photo of Natalee, after the "something bad happened" statement (June 10-11 2005 weekend). It came up on searches (Google) for a long time.

That might be the explanation. (Doesn't explain the Croes result, though.)

Good Morning Msmarple...I never saw that...do you have it saved? can you post it here....

Sunny - I didn't save it. It probably was posted at SM around that time, though.

thanks MsM..perhaps Klaas has it


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: AZSunny on August 28, 2007, 11:26:35 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 11:26:47 AM
http://video.aol.com/video/news-dutch-show-hopes-to-solve-holloway-case/1492540

I was just looking through some videos. You guys have seen this, but it shows a car reported to be Deepak's being loaded for impounding at approx. 1:10 minutes into the video. It has 6 spokes on the tire rims. There's been some speculation about the car, and thought I'd post it for anyone interested.

thanks CBB....I remember the video.....I have lots of questions about the car....but like so many other things...no answers

Wasn't Deepak's car impounded after he had taken it to Osman Auto for cleaning and or repair? Can anyone confirm this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 11:30:39 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

Valid thinking . . . however, what if by saying it was Satish it actually protects him and the person who was actually there?? Just thinking out loud. Then again, hasn't it been discussed that Satish hung out with Joran and friends more than Deepak?? It is hard to say . . . so much disinformation and so many lies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 11:32:15 AM
Morning Monkeys! Very interesting discussion regarding whether it was Satish or Freddy with Joran at CnC's. Freddy and Satish look similar IMO.

Good Morning Shadow!  yes you are right about the similarities in physical appearance especially at night and from people not familiar with them


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:32:47 AM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:33:14 AM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money. The girl bet U.S. $ 20,= in the game and I helped her win U.S. $ 100,= with it. After the girl had won U.S. $ 100,= I advised her to call it quits but she wanted to continue. I told her again that she should stop and her friends also said that she should stop. Probably the girl after that went to cash in her chips for money. The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".

From Jaime's June 17, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.



So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 11:33:46 AM
Morning Monkeys! Very interesting discussion regarding whether it was Satish or Freddy with Joran at CnC's. Freddy and Satish look similar IMO.

Good Morning Shadow!  yes you are right about the similarities in physical appearance especially at night and from people not familiar with them

Hey Sunny! True, especially if they had never seen either of them before that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 11:35:04 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

Not sure either...just thinking out loud I suppose.  I personally think  Satish was there in the beginning, but could have been home when the pond scenario occurred.  Thus the reason Satish was not identified as the third person.  Then of course, who was cleaning Deepak's car in the early hours?  Just Deepak? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 11:36:41 AM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money. The girl bet U.S. $ 20,= in the game and I helped her win U.S. $ 100,= with it. After the girl had won U.S. $ 100,= I advised her to call it quits but she wanted to continue. I told her again that she should stop and her friends also said that she should stop. Probably the girl after that went to cash in her chips for money. The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".

From Jaime's June 17, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.



So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 

Picked out from the crowd and pre-planned from the beginning...that is what I think...but that is IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 11:37:14 AM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

Well. to put Freddie with Joran that night you would need to leave out a Kalpoe.  Who says it has to be Satish?  Maybe Satish used Deepak's car????

Just playing around with this whole concept of Freddie versus one of the Kalpose....will have to give it some more thought.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:37:45 AM
Lala's I agree.  They've done it 20 times before, it was a game. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JustMeT on August 28, 2007, 11:37:51 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

You are right. It wouldnt happen. Deepak or the attorneys would openly state Satish wasnt there if he wasnt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 11:38:44 AM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money. The girl bet U.S. $ 20,= in the game and I helped her win U.S. $ 100,= with it. After the girl had won U.S. $ 100,= I advised her to call it quits but she wanted to continue. I told her again that she should stop and her friends also said that she should stop. Probably the girl after that went to cash in her chips for money. The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".

From Jaime's June 17, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.



So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 

Nice catch Klass. I would suspect Jaime's timeline to be more accurate. Joran could never admit to that timeline because it makes it all the more premeditated.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 11:39:03 AM
I think the notion that Satish wasn't there at all is plausible. I've been going through videos, looking for the car video leaving C&C's and man, it's a gut wrencher to see the interviews agian of what the family has been through!

I wish Beth could have had this conversation with Satish. I think he's the weakest link in the chain of information, and whether he was there or not, Satish knows what happened, IMO.

http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=1111290889&fr=yfp-t-501

Everytime I see a video of Beth I am in awe of her strength.....but one picture always remains in the front of my head....the one where she is near collapse and 2 men are holding her up...her pain rushes through my computer screen and hurts my soul.....I too wish she could have gotten him to talk!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:40:37 AM
I've got to get to work, but will leave you guys with this. This person is at the center of it all.
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/joran.jpg)

Enjoy the day, guys!


(BTW: Please read my signature line.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 28, 2007, 11:42:24 AM
Not sure Sunny, except maybe Freddy needed protecting more.  IIRC Paulus got him a lawyer early on and Freddy's Dad walked out on a meeting with Paulus and Anita?  Didn't Deepak tell Joran to leave Satish out of this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:44:52 AM
I can't leave without saying, GREAT CATCH Klaas! Do we have a place for listing just such inconsistencies?

If anyone were ever interested in actually INTERVIEWING the suspects again, they could print it off and be armed and ready.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 11:45:15 AM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

Freddy has been protected since day one.  I believe a lot of people are afraid of Freddy's family.

The one thing that repeats over and over in my mind is that Satish said he asked Deepak how the girl was in one of his statements.  I believe Satish witnessed what Joran did and knew the condition of Natalee before Paulus sent the Kalpoes home or at least Satish.

Dave has said there were 3 people seen washing Deepak's car that night (Deepak, Satish & Freddy).  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:49:53 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

You are right. It wouldnt happen. Deepak or the attorneys would openly state Satish wasnt there if he wasnt.
Could Satish have gone home early and Freddy joined Deepak and Joran with Natalee?  We know Freddy has been known to video before, was this what they usually did?  Did Joran pick the tourist girl (s) up then Freddy film the activities?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:52:07 AM
I can't leave without saying, GREAT CATCH Klaas! Do we have a place for listing just such inconsistencies?

If anyone were ever interested in actually INTERVIEWING the suspects again, they could print it off and be armed and ready.

Natalee's Freebirds have done a great job of listing inconsistencies in all areas.  There is a thread for all of the Freebird's posts called Corruption and Collusion in Aruba and it's in 2 locations (NH forum and Important Case Document forum).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 28, 2007, 11:52:15 AM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

IMO - Freddy is involved - some way - some how...Perhaps Satish was with them at first and then switched up and Freddy took Satish's place.  Deepak wanted to protect Satish. And both Kalpoes said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

It would have looked bad if J2K told ALE that they switched Satish for Freddy - when all they were doing (according to them) was giving a girl a ride. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JustMeT on August 28, 2007, 11:52:50 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

You are right. It wouldnt happen. Deepak or the attorneys would openly state Satish wasnt there if he wasnt.
Could Satish have gone home early and Freddy joined Deepak and Joran with Natalee? 
Absolutely. Or could Deepak have gone home?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:54:18 AM
Well, if Freddy was known to video girls for porn, and that's what they were doing with Natalee, it would serve to protect them all to keep Freddy out of it, wouldn't it?

I really have to go! See Ya!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:54:49 AM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/08/28/aruba-fun-in-the-sun-or-water-spouts-missed-this-in-the-broshure/

Aruba … Fun in the Sun or Water Spouts … Missed this in the Brochure


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:55:56 AM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

You are right. It wouldnt happen. Deepak or the attorneys would openly state Satish wasnt there if he wasnt.
Could Satish have gone home early and Freddy joined Deepak and Joran with Natalee? 
Absolutely. Or could Deepak have gone home?

Yep, either one or neither one.  Didn't Satish miss the entire next day of school?  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 11:58:29 AM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

SNIPPED

So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 

I'd go with Jamie's stament before the sporter's.....that one has yet to tell a TRUTH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 11:59:12 AM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

Freddy has been protected since day one.  I believe a lot of people are afraid of Freddy's family.

The one thing that repeats over and over in my mind is that Satish said he asked Deepak how the girl was in one of his statements.  I believe Satish witnessed what Joran did and knew the condition of Natalee before Paulus sent the Kalpoes home or at least Satish.

Dave has said there were 3 people seen washing Deepak's car that night (Deepak, Satish & Freddy).  JMO.

Exactly what led me to think about the possibility of Satish being named as a suspect to protect Freddy. Also if Freddy was into filming porn, then maybe that is part of the reason to keep him out of it. Just thinking out loud.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JustMeT on August 28, 2007, 12:00:09 PM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

You are right. It wouldnt happen. Deepak or the attorneys would openly state Satish wasnt there if he wasnt.
Could Satish have gone home early and Freddy joined Deepak and Joran with Natalee? 
Absolutely. Or could Deepak have gone home?

Yep, either one or neither one.  Didn't Satish miss the entire next day of school?  :wink:

Yep.
He often missed school after sneaking out all night. ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 12:00:36 PM
Well, if Freddy was known to video girls for porn, and that's what they were doing with Natalee, it would serve to protect them all to keep Freddy out of it, wouldn't it?

I really have to go! See Ya!

Thinking the same thing and posted it before I saw your post.  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 12:01:20 PM
I've got to get to work, but will leave you guys with this. This person is at the center of it all.
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/joran.jpg)

Enjoy the day, guys!


(BTW: Please read my signature line.)

Look at those DEAD eyes.....his eyes are certainly not a window to a soul...he has none


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunnyinTX on August 28, 2007, 12:02:42 PM
Not sure Sunny, except maybe Freddy needed protecting more.  IIRC Paulus got him a lawyer early on and Freddy's Dad walked out on a meeting with Paulus and Anita?  Didn't Deepak tell Joran to leave Satish out of this?

yes d did tell j to keep satish out of it.....why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 12:05:36 PM
Not sure Sunny, except maybe Freddy needed protecting more.  IIRC Paulus got him a lawyer early on and Freddy's Dad walked out on a meeting with Paulus and Anita?  Didn't Deepak tell Joran to leave Satish out of this?

yes d did tell j to keep satish out of it.....why?

Could be that Satish was not there for the attack but knew the plan and Deepak did not think Satish could handle being interrogated?? Just a thought.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 12:06:37 PM
Did we determine if Freddy has a car?

What if Deepak dropped Joran, Satish and Natalee off someplace.  Then Freddy arrived?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 12:08:06 PM
IF there was a car following the car with J2K & Natalee leaving CnC's what if Freddie or Jaime was in the car and they switched cars and Satish drove Deepak's car home??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 12:08:37 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 12:08:43 PM
The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".



JUST MORE lies

i thought he was just visiting the island  :-x


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 12:09:24 PM
Did we determine if Freddy has a car?

What if Deepak dropped Joran, Satish and Natalee off someplace.  Then Freddy arrived?

Just thinking along those lines as well . . . I don' remember if we ever confirmed he had a car.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 12:10:57 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

I don't remember but would be interested in seeing that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 12:14:00 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

Merian Ernest posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 12:14:21 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

I don't remember but would be interested in seeing that.

I have been looking for it this morning but have not found it.  I can't remember if it was posted here.  (I need more ginseng!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 12:18:02 PM
This is a photo of a building on Aruba. Can anyone tell me what it is and where it may be? I can't save the pix so here is the link.
http://travelswithfred.smugmug.com/gallery/1726292#85232376-M-LB


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 12:18:35 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

I don't remember but would be interested in seeing that.

I have been looking for it this morning but have not found it.  I can't remember if it was posted here.  (I need more ginseng!)

Merian Ernest. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 28, 2007, 12:19:23 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

iirc, Simian.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 12:23:06 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/freddy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 12:23:13 PM
http://rizk.smugmug.com/gallery/1095071/19/50927864#50927864
Excellent photo of the back of carlos n' charlies here. Click to enlarge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on August 28, 2007, 12:25:44 PM
IF there was a car following the car with J2K & Natalee leaving CnC's what if Freddie or Jaime was in the car and they switched cars and Satish drove Deepak's car home??

And what if that switch was made a the VDS' - thus the need to change the story that they went by the house....

I don;t know - What keeps coming to my mind is, that they just picked up Natalee for a night of fun for the pimps, like they had countless times before, They were just planning on dropping her off in a drugged state on the beach somewhere, and she would just go home.  They weren't planning on the "something bad" happening.

I can't see them planning alot of alibies(sp?) or stories until that something happened, and they had to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 12:27:02 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

iirc, Simian.

 :roll: :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: AZSunny on August 28, 2007, 12:31:36 PM
Perhaps I am missing something very obvious, but if Deepak is trying to protect Satish, why wouldn't he just say that Satish wasn't there with them that night?  Why would Satish say he was there  when in fact he wasn't?  When it comes to the  statements by Satish or Deepak  wouldn't they both have stated that Satish wasn't with them?   Help me here, I am not getting the train of thought to this hypothesis.

You are right. It wouldnt happen. Deepak or the attorneys would openly state Satish wasnt there if he wasnt.
Could Satish have gone home early and Freddy joined Deepak and Joran with Natalee?  We know Freddy has been known to video before, was this what they usually did?  Did Joran pick the tourist girl (s) up then Freddy film the activities?

This would make more sense to me.
 Question then: How did Satish get home, and what time was it said that Satish was on the computer at home?  Could Freddie be sending the videos to Satish and that was his role in this scenario?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 28, 2007, 12:34:44 PM
Cannot stay long, and do not have the time to pull Satish's PVs but he took the Aruban 5th in most of them....didn't he?  Just thinking about was he or wasn't he discussion & relation to his not answering questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 12:36:02 PM
Sorry guys, I have my riddlers all mixed up.  Please excuse me while go in the corner and bang my head against the wall for a while. I have been reading too long this morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 12:43:00 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/frdj.d.jpg)

While looking for the photo with Freddy in it, I ran across this. I've seen it before, but it's been a while. Thought I'd share it.

I'm REALLY working!  :roll:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 28, 2007, 12:43:03 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

iirc, Simian.

 :roll: :roll:

sorry lala's

simian -- when he was posting using the nic merrian ernest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 12:44:05 PM
Did we determine if Freddy has a car?

What if Deepak dropped Joran, Satish and Natalee off someplace.  Then Freddy arrived?

Most likely place to me would be Joran's apartment.  Jaime stated in his statement he went to be early which I believe was BS.  What if Freddy was waiting in Joran's apartment with Sander and Koen for them to bring Natalee there.

Deepak said they need to arrest Sander and Koen also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 12:48:37 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

iirc, Simian.


Oh goodness!  Now I am the one confused.  Still banging head against the wall. 

 :roll: :roll:

sorry lala's

simian -- when he was posting using the nic merrian ernest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 12:52:39 PM
http://rizk.smugmug.com/gallery/1095071/19/50927864#50927864
Excellent photo of the back of carlos n' charlies here. Click to enlarge.

Clear picture of the street also where they said they went around the block.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 12:53:07 PM
I knew I had not lost my mind...well you never know for sure...but...



Merian Ernest Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject: Who framed who?
Take a close look at the famous picture.

Deepak, Joran and Satish at C&C. Whose hand is on Satish's shoulder? Take another look.
A really good look.

It can never be the hand of any of the three.

Merian Ernest Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:07 pm Post subject: The mysterious hand...
See the hand. On the infamous picture in C&C. The boy in the middle and the Hindus on each
side.

Whose hand is on the shoulder of the Hindu on he left? Somebody is missing on this picture.
Maybe somebody was placed on this picture?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: jackb on August 28, 2007, 01:05:02 PM
Does anyone remember someone making an issue about whose hand was in that pic of JK2 that was being shown on all the news stations?  They were saying to notice the hand.  That hand was Freddie's.  Who kept bringing that up?

That would be bluej.  I have the whole pic now.  It was freddy.  At the time Jack or the real Sam.  It is Freddy in the pic.       blue


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: shadow on August 28, 2007, 01:06:34 PM
I knew I had not lost my mind...well you never know for sure...but...



Merian Ernest Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject: Who framed who?
Take a close look at the famous picture.

Deepak, Joran and Satish at C&C. Whose hand is on Satish's shoulder? Take another look.
A really good look.

It can never be the hand of any of the three.

Merian Ernest Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:07 pm Post subject: The mysterious hand...
See the hand. On the infamous picture in C&C. The boy in the middle and the Hindus on each
side.

Whose hand is on the shoulder of the Hindu on he left? Somebody is missing on this picture.
Maybe somebody was placed on this picture?


What do you think they mean by saying the above bolded?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 01:16:42 PM
Maybe I should post a little more here...Am I going to get in trouble? This isn't the Shango thread.   :roll:

Merian Ernest Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject: Who framed who?
Take a close look at the famous picture.

Deepak, Joran and Satish at C&C. Whose hand is on Satish's shoulder? Take another look.
A really good look.

It can never be the hand of any of the three.

Merian Ernest Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:07 pm Post subject: The mysterious hand...
See the hand. On the infamous picture in C&C. The boy in the middle and the Hindus on each
side.

Whose hand is on the shoulder of the Hindu on he left? Somebody is missing on this picture.
Maybe somebody was placed on this picture?

It seems more people are vanishing in this case.

Merian Ernest Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:22 pm Post subject: Centennial Park
Doesn't anybody here remember who Richard Jewell is?

As far as foreighners not having the same rights as compared to when they are in their
own county...damn right they don't. US Citizens should especially bear that in mind

**Question from poster: JetSki Boy. = locoman?

Merian Ernest Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:40 pm Post subject: Thursday is a day with no
character...
Who snatched the body? The mutts seem to think it was there.

Obstruction anybody? Cowboys don't have badges.

There's a well in the back. Who will go and look?

No codes for the wicked.

whos mutts - Van Der Straaten stepped infront of SAR and told them to leave.
Where are we talking about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: jackb on August 28, 2007, 01:17:59 PM
I knew I had not lost my mind...well you never know for sure...but...



Merian Ernest Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject: Who framed who?
Take a close look at the famous picture.

Deepak, Joran and Satish at C&C. Whose hand is on Satish's shoulder? Take another look.
A really good look.

It can never be the hand of any of the three.

Merian Ernest Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 4:07 pm Post subject: The mysterious hand...
See the hand. On the infamous picture in C&C. The boy in the middle and the Hindus on each
side.

Whose hand is on the shoulder of the Hindu on he left? Somebody is missing on this picture.
Maybe somebody was placed on this picture?


Someone posted the picture on this page of the person whose hand it is.  It is Freddy.  He, in one of Joran's first versions, was spending the night with Joran, later that was scrapped by him.  I, as well believe he was there and others as well at the PVs residence and Jorans extention to that residence.       bluej


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 01:33:38 PM
Yes, it is Freddy...at first the MSM removed his part in the photo due to the fact they had no idea if he was involved.  It wasn't until later that they showed the complete photo.  So once again...did Simian...er I mean Merian know more than we are led to believe?  Just throwing that out there...we can take this discussion to the Shango thread if you like. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 01:40:09 PM
Yes, it is Freddy...at first the MSM removed his part in the photo due to the fact they had no idea if he was involved.  It wasn't until later that they showed the complete photo.  So once again...did Simian...er I mean Merian know more than we are led to believe?  Just throwing that out there...we can take this discussion to the Shango thread if you like. 

Lala's I have no idea but I do suspect Freddy is involved.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 01:40:38 PM
Not inside connections ... not a vision ... not a riddle ... just a theory based on researching info that out there.

+++++++++

I believe that Freddy was waiting at the VDS' residence ... with his camera ... when Satish, Deepak and Joran arrived with a drugged Natalee.  In an attempt to escape Natalee sustained a head injury.  Then during the sexual assault that ensued Natalee appeared to pass out.  The decision was made to take her to the beach where she could sleep it off and ... make her own way to the HI in time to catch her plane back home.

Enroute to the beach ... Deepak drops off Satish at home.  Prior to reaching the beach ... it was determined that Natalee was deceased.  However ... it was decided to stick to the original plan of leaving her at the beach.

Deepak dropped off Joran, Freddy and a deceased Natalee at the beach while he parked his vehicle a short distance away at the tennis club.  After leaving Natalee at the beach (Fisherman's Hut).  Deepak then runs back to the beach and meets up with Joran and Freddy.

A very short time later ... Joran, Deepak and Freddy hurriedly climb into Deepak's vehicle.  A discussion ensues and panic has set in.  The realization that the injury and the DNA evidence on Natalee's person could be very incriminating when it was considered that Joran, Deepak and Satish were observed leaving CC with Natalee.

The gardener enters the picture and ... then Paulus is contacted and ... takes over.

Janet

+++++++++


Diario Aruba
December 6, 2006


Oranjestad (AAN) As promised to the peoples of Aruba and the U.S.A., DIARIO will continue with its investigation on the missing girl, Natalee Holloway, and will publish legitimate documents accompanied by analysis and questions that sooner or later will bring out the truth.

<snipped>

Seeing that the Dutch officer himself mentions that "they" entered into panic, according to the declaration of Freddy Zedan, then there were more than one person involved and everyone can reach his own conclusion that Freddy Zedan knows those who he himself referred to as "they", or in Papiamento "nan".  "They" went into panic when Natalee remained passed out!!! This means that more than one person was present when Natalee remained passed out and where are these people who were with Natalee when she remained passed out?  On the beach like "they" want the police and everyone else to believe, or elsewhere? Do they who belong to the group referred to as "they" realize now that the circle is slowly closing around "them"? For those who understand what this means, few words are necessary!


Diana Emerencia - Freddy's Attorney
Decatur Daily News
August 31, 2005
 

ORANJESTAD, Aruba (AP) — ...... A third man was arrested with the Kalpoes but his lawyer said Monday that it was unrelated to Holloway's disappearance.

Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis, a friend of van der Sloot and the Kalpoes, was arrested on suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia.

Zedan-Arambatzis, 21, is also suspected of photographing the girl in "tempting poses" and showing the images to other people, Emerencia said.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incidents, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, she said.  


Satish Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


My mother was then going to wake me up at 10.30 a.m. She though overslept and did not wake me up. I woke up around 12.00 noon. My brother woke up around 1 p.m. I asked him how Joran did get home during the night. He told me Joran had called him while walking in the direction to his home. He told me Joran told him he walked bare feet because he left the shoes at the beach.  Then I asked my brother how the girl was doing.


Beth Twitty
LARRY KING LIVE
February 23, 2007


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY:  Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon, he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI. She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.


Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
July 29, 2005


GRACE: OK. Jossy, is there any way to tie in a white pick-up to this scenario?
 
MANSUR: ... there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 01:45:14 PM
Janet - your theory makes alot of sense, IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 01:51:34 PM
Janet - your theory makes alot of sense, IMO
I agree -- VERY plausible!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 01:55:35 PM
Janet,

You're theory makes sense, but where does the premeditated murder charge for Paulus come from? And, the heavy battery charge against Guido?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 01:57:18 PM
Janet,

You're theory makes sense, but where does the premeditated murder charge for Paulus come from? And, the heavy battery charge against Guido?

Not a clue!  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 28, 2007, 02:19:17 PM
MANSUR: ... there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.

was this during the night or early morning when she disappeared?

by the way Hi Monkeys!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 02:42:24 PM
Janet,

You're theory makes sense, but where does the premeditated murder charge for Paulus come from? And, the heavy battery charge against Guido?

My theory continued ...

GUIDO

Guido could have been waiting with Freddy at the VDS' residence for the arrival of Joran, Deepak, Satish and Natalee.


PAULUS

In January, 2007 the Superior Court ruled that Paulus' detainment was justified because his original declaration stated that he was in the area of McDonald's on the morning that Natalee Holloway disappeared.


STEVE CROES

Steve Croes came forward with a false alibi for the main suspects.  Also he could have assisted Paulus in moving a deceased Natalee from the beach on that fateful morning.  An early rumor implied there was an early morning cell call between the VDS' cell and Steve Croes's cell.  Steve Croes and Geoffrey van Cromvoirt retained same attorney.


GEOFFREY VAN CROMVOIT

GVC could have assisted Paulus in moving a deceased Natalee from the beach on that fateful morning.  Steve Croes and Geoffrey van Cromvoirt retained the same attorney.

+++++++++++++++++++++++


SUSPECTS IN THE NATALEE HOLLOWAY CASE


Joran, Deepak, Satish, Steve Croes and Paulus
FOX NEWS
June 24, 2005


Joran van der Sloot (search) and his friends Deepak and Satish Kalpoe are being held under suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

A fourth man, party boat DJ Steve Croes, is being held under the same conditions.

The fifth man, Paul van der Sloot (search) — the father of 17-year-old Joran — was being held on suspicion of complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping. Under the Aruban system, complicity is a lesser charge.


Geoffrey van Cromvoirt (GVC)
ABC NEWS
April 24, 2006


Geoffrey van Cromvoirt, 19, has been released into the custody of his parents after spending more than a week in an Aruba jail on suspicion of "criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway.


Guildo Wever
FOX NEWS
May 22, 2006


Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen

++++++++++++++++++

CRITERIA FOR DETAINMENT UNDER DUTCH LAW

Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
July 20, 2005


ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: There is no grand jury in Aruba. It`s a different system. You are arrested based on suspicion, on strong suspicion. After a maximum of 146 days, the prosecution must determine the criminal offense that has been committed and make an official summation for court. And God forbid that they cannot determine what criminal offense has been committed, the case remains open, and it can remain open for a whole number of years, actually, until the due process, the international rules about due process, up to two years


Noraina Pietersz - Defence Attorney
Associated Press
June 9, 2005


Under Aruban law, only serious suspicion from investigators — not solid evidence — is needed for a judge to rule that suspects can be held, Pietersz said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 02:45:02 PM
Janet - your theory makes alot of sense, IMO



 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 02:57:48 PM
Janet - your theory makes alot of sense, IMO
I agree -- VERY plausible!

I agree!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 02:58:21 PM
Janet,

You're theory makes sense, but where does the premeditated murder charge for Paulus come from? And, the heavy battery charge against Guido?

Janet's theory does makes sense.  Joran is the one who inflicted the head injury.

I have long believed that Natalee made that phone call and this is what set Joran off.  I'll add Viet Vet's post where he said Joran hit Natalee in the head with a bat.  Now we have an injured Natalee at the Sloots.  This is where Paulus enters and decides not to help her and dispose of her.  Does disposing of a severely injured person who was in the home of a judge lead to premeditated murder on that hell hole of an island.

If Natalee is found alive both Paul and Joran are finished.  The crime happened at his home with Paulus present.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 03:00:10 PM
Posted by ElaineS at RU:

Quote
Heli ~ looks like a front page poster brought up the "mistake" in spelling by and to Klassend, and it was corrected. I thought she was a teacher of sorts??? I hope she doesn't have to write anything!!! lol She'd have flunked out of my class a long time ago.

Here's a precious foreword to the article about the waterspout which I assume was written by Klassend:

Aruba, One Happy Island, experienced One Happy water spout and flooding. We thought the Aruban AHATA said this type of weather never occurred in Aruba? That type of PR can’t be good for tourism either.

This idiot doesn't realize that thank goodness no damage was done!!!

AND, the tourists thought it was amazing and cool!!!

It's strange how they worry so much about Aruba, isn't it?? 


ElaineS - No, you assume wrong and thus have made an ass out of yourself again.   :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 03:00:56 PM
Janet,

I think you're response is probably the answer only spoken by Karin Janssen. It's hard to understand if this woman is a moron or part of the corruption.

Why, of all the charges she could have attached to her friend and fellow Dutchman, would she use PREMEDITATED murder?

I think Paulus got involved when she was still alive, has to be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 28, 2007, 03:09:17 PM
If not for the Casino pic I a might be able to consider that Paulus was only involved in the "clean up".....he was involved in it from the beginning...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 03:15:34 PM
Posted by ElaineS at RU:

Quote
Heli ~ looks like a front page poster brought up the "mistake" in spelling by and to Klassend, and it was corrected. I thought she was a teacher of sorts??? I hope she doesn't have to write anything!!! lol She'd have flunked out of my class a long time ago.

Here's a precious foreword to the article about the waterspout which I assume was written by Klassend:

Aruba, One Happy Island, experienced One Happy water spout and flooding. We thought the Aruban AHATA said this type of weather never occurred in Aruba? That type of PR can’t be good for tourism either.

This idiot doesn't realize that thank goodness no damage was done!!!

AND, the tourists thought it was amazing and cool!!!

It's strange how they worry so much about Aruba, isn't it?? 


ElaineS - No, you assume wrong and thus have made an ass out of yourself again.   :wink:

People should worry about Aruba.  The island is obviously a more dangerous place than advertised and if you are a tourist and ‘something bad happens’ to you the people last seen with you will placed on a pedestal by those who spend way too much time trying to convice themselves that personal responsibility should only be expected of the victim.  This is done to validate themselves.  They misbehave, therefore everyone misbehaves.

Klaas, you should feel honored when that group over there shows contempt for you.   You obviously stand for whatever they are against.  This is a good thing.

We love ya over here!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 03:17:31 PM
JuJu,

Not to mention the superior courts words when they rejected his claim for compensation. He had 2 contacts with Natalee.

I think he "targeted" her and was at the house when she arrived, he ordered her killed.

On a side note, Greta's brilliance was again on display last night. She jumped on a "new" story, saying Michael Vicks (yes she said Vicks) was in a "heap of trouble."

Nice phrasing I tend to believe him Greta.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 03:18:43 PM
If not for the Casino pic I a might be able to consider that Paulus was only involved in the "clean up".....he was involved in it from the beginning...

That casino pic needs to be looked at by the authorities.  Not only that pic, but the tape itself should have a better view of who that person is and how long they were at that table.  That guy does resemble Paulus from what little we can see.  I wish there was a better view of that guy.  If it is Paulus...he's got some 'splainin' to do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 03:20:08 PM
Of course it's paulus, come on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 03:22:33 PM
Of course it's paulus, come on.

LOL.  I think so, too, Frank.  But you have to admit it ain't that great a shot of him.  Also, I would like to know how long he was there and how much time did he spend talking to Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 03:27:49 PM
If not for the Casino pic I a might be able to consider that Paulus was only involved in the "clean up".....he was involved in it from the beginning...

JuJu ... you may be right.  I also firmly believe that the man recorded conversing with Natalee at the black jack table is Paulus.

However ... I suspect that when Paulus  considered his involvement in the coverup ... the disappearance of Natalee's remains ... it was important that he distance himself from Natalee all together ... to ensure there was no connection.  This is why the story conveyed by both Joran and Paulus emerged ... the story that implies that Paulus left the casino half way through the poker game ... prior to Joran's encounter with Natalee at the black jack table.

Janet.


Joran van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 1, 2006


VAN DER SLOOT: I remember — I remember when I first saw her. I went there, I went to the casino, the Excelsior casino at the Holiday Inn, to play a free poker tournament. I remember walking in there and sitting at a — playing a — first playing a poker tournament, then afterwards, when I was done, going to a blackjack table and sitting down. And I remember her and her friends coming up to the table. They sat down. They wanted to play blackjack.

<snipped>

VAN DER SLOOT: ... And yes, so my dad had come with me. And halfway through, he — because my mom at the time was in Holland, halfway through, he had to go back home to my little brother because he was home alone. And I took his place at the poker tournament because I had lost earlier. So I went in and I took his place and I played for him.


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 28, 2007, 03:27:53 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 03:34:03 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic

The only 'confirmation' I have seen is by those of us on the blogs who believe it is him. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 03:37:42 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic

The only 'confirmation' I have seen is by those of us on the blogs who believe it is him. 

When JQK was on one of the news shows and they asked him if it was Paulus I believe his response was it sure does look like him.  That is enough confirmation for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 28, 2007, 03:39:48 PM
http://www.majorwager.com/forums/mess-hall/44196-anyone-else-following-natalee-holloway-case-9.html
amigoe.com :

Mother Kalpoe-brothers fired

ARUBA – “The dismissal of Nadira Ramirez, the mother of the Kalpoe brothers, has nothing to do with the Holloway-case or the fact that she is the mother of the Kalpoe-brothers”, said Ike Cohen, manager of the Manchebo hotel.

With his, Cohen reacts on Ramirez’ comments in a morning paper saying that her dismissal is connected to the Holloway-case. “We have given Ramirez the reasons for her dismissal. We did this verbally as well as in writing. It is not up to us to publish the reasons for this dismissal, as we are of the opinion that this would invade the privacy of Mrs. Ramirez.” She was supposedly fired due to fraud. After having taken two days off in connection with the release of her sons, Ramirez went back to work on Wednesday. When she was told to go to the manager’s office, she thought that it was to be congratulated with the release of her sons. But that was not the case. She was fired. Apparently, she took the money of the customers’ cancelled bills, and put it in her own pocket. She denies this and considers contesting the dismissal. Ramirez has been working in the Manchebo steakhouse for nine years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 03:44:12 PM
Interresting article posted on the front page of SM by Richard:

Drug lord's private island seized

August 28, 2007
BY ASSOCIATED PRESS

BOGOTA, Colombia---- Colombia said Monday it has seized a private Caribbean island and hundreds of other properties allegedly used by powerful cocaine trafficker to launder millions of dollars in drug profits.

Juan Carlos Ramirez Abadia was arrested in a luxury condominium on the outskirts of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on Aug. 7. He faces three U.S. federal indictments on drug and racketeering charges, and U.S. officials have said they plan to seek his extradition.

Colombian authorities said they seized 300 properties across the country -- including farms, apartments, empty lots, a hotel and gymnasium -- worth about $400 million.

They also seized a private island near the Caribbean tourist city of Cartagena, four cars and 18 private businesses, among them a travel agency and real estate company. They gave no details on the island.

Ramirez Abadia, 44, said in an interview Sunday night with TV Globo's Fantastico news and entertainment program -- Brazil's most popular -- that his arrest will not affect drug trafficking.

''From all the people who started with me in this business several years ago, there are only two or three left. The rest either died or were extradited,'' he said. ''I'm in prison but there are people replacing me, then there will be others. It will never end.''

Even while acknowledging his involvement in Colombia's lucrative cocaine trade, Ramirez Abadia vowed not to testify against his former partners if he is extradited to the United States .

''I'm not going to make any deals,'' he said. ''I'll assume responsibility for my problems alone.''

Ramirez Abadia -- nicknamed ''Chupeta,'' or lollipop in Colombian Spanish -- is considered one of the ringleaders of the Norte del Valle drug cartel, Colombia's most powerful. The United States had offered a $5 million reward for his capture.

In 1996 he was sentenced to 13 years in prison in Colombia on a drug conviction, but was released in 2001.

In January, authorities confiscated $90 million in various currencies that Ramirez Abadia had allegedly stashed in safe houses in the southern city of Cali, near the cartel's base.

http://www.suntimes.com/news/world/531005,drug082807.article


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 03:45:44 PM
No, it's possible someone else who coincidentally looks exactly like the father of Joran who is also sitting at the same table and who Natalee is pointing to while talking to the guy who just happens to, at that, moment be sitting next to Natalee. Yeah, it is him. He slaughtered Natalee.

Only Paulus van der sloot can make Michael Vick look harmless.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: oldencrabby on August 28, 2007, 03:50:58 PM

VAN DER SLOOT: ... And yes, so my dad had come with me. And halfway through, he — because my mom at the time was in Holland, halfway through, he had to go back home to my little brother because he was home alone. And I took his place at the poker tournament because I had lost earlier. So I went in and I took his place and I played for him.


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time.

I hope I cleaned up some of this quote so that it isn't so long.  This is where I am confused.  Early on it was also stated that Paulus had just returned from another island that afternoon (story was Joran went a picked him up at the airport?). So, was he not home with the boys while Anita was gone? Again...so many stories to try to keep sorted out!  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 03:55:18 PM
as i have mentioned a few times before

if that is NOT paulus i will eat my Left Tongue






robots have 2 tongues  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 28, 2007, 03:59:36 PM
Warm bodies need to Stand Up for Natalee.
Shows coming up all over the U.S. - probably in a city NEAR YOU!



http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.new#new (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.new#new)

This link is to the current page of the "Aruba" tourism/travel show thread.

6 shows coming up --

Chicago-Sept 25,26 and 27th
Minnesota-October 27th and 28th
Atlantic City-October 30th and 31st
King of Prussia PA-Nov 17th and 18th
Ft lauderdale-November- I will be at this one
Luxury Travel Show in Vegas- Dec 4th thru the 6th.

If you can't make it to a show, a $$ donation helps - folks are on their own for travel/lodging etc., but the handouts (brochures, buttons) and signs are another expense.

If you read through the thread you will get an idea of what's what. There are photos from previous shows, and I think a copy of the brochure.

There is an email address (which recently changed - be sure to use the "Justice" addy rather than the "Volunteers" addy). It is posted at the thread above.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 28, 2007, 04:03:08 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic

The only 'confirmation' I have seen is by those of us on the blogs who believe it is him. 

What would the odds be that in a nation of about 70,000 people, a guy that looked exactly like someone who has a hand in Natalee's disappearance walked in and sat down next to Natalee, a few hours before the other guy made her disappear?

There is no doubt that is Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 28, 2007, 04:03:16 PM
MANSUR: ... there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.

was this during the night or early morning when she disappeared?

by the way Hi Monkeys!

I remember reading at RWV about a story from a tourist who saw the same thing. I think they observed 3 men retreaving a body from a dumpster and putting it in a tarp and then into a white PU. I believe one of them worked for the Marriott or HI. This could also be tied into "Franscisco" who said he helped bury Natalee and was then locked up in the mental hospital according to Art Wood. Could this be linked to ATM transactions that morning? Or the shallow grave that TES had found?We also heard about the witness that saw 3 sweaty boys with a shovel..Could that be the same area?

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/captaru10307132005arubabj8_th.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 04:03:16 PM

VAN DER SLOOT: ... And yes, so my dad had come with me. And halfway through, he — because my mom at the time was in Holland, halfway through, he had to go back home to my little brother because he was home alone. And I took his place at the poker tournament because I had lost earlier. So I went in and I took his place and I played for him.


Paulus van der Sloot
Witness Statement
June 18, 2005


On May 29th 2005, at approximately 16.00 hours, I went with Joran to the “Free Carribean Stud Tournament” in the Holiday Inn. During the break, at approximately 18.30 hours, I went back home. My youngest son Sebastian who was playing at a friends house was due to be dropped off at home around that time.

I hope I cleaned up some of this quote so that it isn't so long.  This is where I am confused.  Early on it was also stated that Paulus had just returned from another island that afternoon (story was Joran went a picked him up at the airport?). So, was he not home with the boys while Anita was gone? Again...so many stories to try to keep sorted out!  :roll:

I have asked these same questions here before.  Exactly how long was Anita gone?  Weren't the two younger boys with her?  If not, who watched out for the kids while both parents were apparently off the island?  Was Sebastion home alone, or was he as someone's house?  How could Joran pick Paulus up at the airport...it's illegal for him to drive.

Well...I'm sure there are other questions about this particular issue.  As usual, when you put the available information together it all becomes contradictory. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 04:04:32 PM
Janssen a Moron?

Quite possible. JQK said she liked Dompig...another idiot.

Contradictory for sure. Refusing to step down while continuing to fail and fail and fail.

It was her silence, and that of the prosecuter's office that i find unforgivable. It provided a breeding ground for untold wild accusations and left Natalee without a voice on Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 04:09:08 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic

The only 'confirmation' I have seen is by those of us on the blogs who believe it is him. 

What would the odds be that in a nation of about 70,000 people, a guy that looked exactly like someone who has a hand in Natalee's disappearance walked in and sat down next to Natalee, a few hours before the other guy made her disappear?

There is no doubt that is Paulus.

I agree, but if you want to make it 'stick' you have to have a better pic.  Even if the chances are one in a million some would say that is enough to raise doubts.  A better pic could seal the deal.  While we may not have one I bet someone in Aruba does.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 04:10:51 PM
Warm bodies need to Stand Up for Natalee.
Shows coming up all over the U.S. - probably in a city NEAR YOU!



http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.new#new (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.new#new)

This link is to the current page of the "Aruba" tourism/travel show thread.

6 shows coming up --

Chicago-Sept 25,26 and 27th
Minnesota-October 27th and 28th
Atlantic City-October 30th and 31st
King of Prussia PA-Nov 17th and 18th
Ft lauderdale-November- I will be at this one
Luxury Travel Show in Vegas- Dec 4th thru the 6th.

If you can't make it to a show, a $$ donation helps - folks are on their own for travel/lodging etc., but the handouts (brochures, buttons) and signs are another expense.

If you read through the thread you will get an idea of what's what. There are photos from previous shows, and I think a copy of the brochure.

There is an email address (which recently changed - be sure to use the "Justice" addy rather than the "Volunteers" addy). It is posted at the thread above.

msmarple - thanks for the reminder!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 04:12:50 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic

The only 'confirmation' I have seen is by those of us on the blogs who believe it is him. 

JuJu and Truthseeker ... there has been no official confirmation but ... it is not only those posting on blogs that are questioning the identity of the man recorded conversing with Natalee at the black jack table.

Jossy Mansur
Dana Pretzer Show
December 14, 2006


DANA: When you look at this case, a question keeps coming up. I am looking at the picture on my PC. It is the alleged picture of a person in the casino with Natalee that looks a lot like Paul. Has there been any update on this issue?

JOSSY: There have not been any change of opinion. People, including people in the casino say that is Paul.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 04:15:02 PM
Cohen was asked if it was Paulus in the casino video. Said he would look into it.

Never appeared on TV, or anywhere, as a representative of Aruba again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 28, 2007, 04:19:15 PM
I thought it was confirmed that it was him in the pic

The only 'confirmation' I have seen is by those of us on the blogs who believe it is him. 

What would the odds be that in a nation of about 70,000 people, a guy that looked exactly like someone who has a hand in Natalee's disappearance walked in and sat down next to Natalee, a few hours before the other guy made her disappear?

There is no doubt that is Paulus.

I agree, but if you want to make it 'stick' you have to have a better pic.  Even if the chances are one in a million some would say that is enough to raise doubts.  A better pic could seal the deal.  While we may not have one I bet someone in Aruba does.

oh I agree, that picture might not hold up in a court, but common sense says its Paulus.  Should be easy enough to prove whether it is him or not by looking at more video(s) or through witnesses, cell records, credit card charges, etc...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 04:20:06 PM
Cohen was asked if it was Paulus in the casino video. Said he would look into it.

Never appeared on TV, or anywhere, as a representative of Aruba again.


igsigs ... you recollection is right on!!

Janet


Steve Cohen
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 4, 2006


COSBY: You know, Steve, have you heard these claims that, in this video—there’s this surveillance video that we saw in the casino that was showed a while back—that Paulus Van Der Sloot may be in the casino actually even talking to Natalee. And what we just heard from John, it doesn’t sound like that was asked of him before, if he actually even engaged in some conversation with her that night.

COHEN: I have to say that, unfortunately, I have not had a chance to view that tape. I’ve been in transit in the last 24 hours. Once I get a look at it, I think I’ll be able to give you a better comment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 28, 2007, 04:20:24 PM
Also add to all of that, Paulus admits to being there that day


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 28, 2007, 04:21:25 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 28, 2007, 04:21:26 PM
Cohen was asked if it was Paulus in the casino video. Said he would look into it.

Never appeared on TV, or anywhere, as a representative of Aruba again.

No he didnt..He is far away from Aruba now as he resides in Seatlle Washington


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 04:25:56 PM
Well, like I said, I believe it is Paulus.  Just wish we had more proof.  Someone besides the three amigos was involved in this.  The idea that Natalee died accidently and the kids panicked would make more sense if they were actually saying that's what happened and then showed the authorities where they buried her.  People, even us, could have understood that.  We wouldn't like it, but it would be at least understandable.  But that did not happen.

Instead we have lie after lie.  In two of the lies Natalee is said to have fallen and hit her head.  Sounds like she did sustain a head injury but I doubt it was from an accidental fall.  Again, someone else is involved, someone who desperately does not want to be discovered.  The body had to be hidden so that an autopsy could never been done which would provide too many clues as to what really happened and who was with her. 

Yeah, I think ole sweaty Poppa Sloot is involved and could very well have been involved from the very beginning...not just for the cover up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 04:28:47 PM
Well, like I said, I believe it is Paulus.  Just wish we had more proof.  Someone besides the three amigos was involved in this.  The idea that Natalee died accidently and the kids panicked would make more sense if they were actually saying that's what happened and then showed the authorities where they buried her.  People, even us, could have understood that.  We wouldn't like it, but it would be at least understandable.  But that did not happen.

Instead we have lie after lie.  In two of the lies Natalee is said to have fallen and hit her head.  Sounds like she did sustain a head injury but I doubt it was from an accidental fall.  Again, someone else is involved, someone who desperately does not want to be discovered.  The body had to be hidden so that an autopsy could never been done which would provide too many clues as to what really happened and who was with her. 

Yeah, I think ole sweaty Poppa Sloot is involved and could very well have been involved from the very beginning...not just for the cover up.


Gosh!  This begs for a Shango quote...I will refrain. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 04:31:09 PM
ElaineS - No, you assume wrong and thus have made an ass out of yourself again.   :wink:
Again, and again and again.  :idea:

With no fear of contradiction, now that Wabbi has been banned, they can now all goosestep uninterrupted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 04:32:18 PM
Did Dompig ever comment on whether it was Paulus?? (seems he said something kind of "round-about")  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 28, 2007, 04:33:42 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)
I think we all got wacked by the "other side".  But I guess we are all pretty much used to that.  LOLOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 04:36:28 PM
ummmmmmm...I do not really understand what this site is all about.
http://www.zebo.com/314047 this is Satish
Joran has one http://www.zebo.com/164829
Jaime has one http://www.zebo.com/159810
Koen http://www.zebo.com/2027843
Andre Santo http://www.zebo.com/231947
Gilayla http://www.zebo.com/316383
couple others....some guy named clinton d who has pimp gang 4 friends
http://www.zebo.com/165830

WTH is the site 4, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 04:37:01 PM
Well, like I said, I believe it is Paulus.  Just wish we had more proof.  Someone besides the three amigos was involved in this.  The idea that Natalee died accidently and the kids panicked would make more sense if they were actually saying that's what happened and then showed the authorities where they buried her.  People, even us, could have understood that.  We wouldn't like it, but it would be at least understandable.  But that did not happen.

Instead we have lie after lie.  In two of the lies Natalee is said to have fallen and hit her head.  Sounds like she did sustain a head injury but I doubt it was from an accidental fall.  Again, someone else is involved, someone who desperately does not want to be discovered.  The body had to be hidden so that an autopsy could never been done which would provide too many clues as to what really happened and who was with her. 

Yeah, I think ole sweaty Poppa Sloot is involved and could very well have been involved from the very beginning...not just for the cover up.


Gosh!  This begs for a Shango quote...I will refrain. 

Lala's it's my understanding that it was agreed that Shango/Simian is part of the NH case and is OK to discuss here.  Probably a good idea to have a separate thread still for serious Shango/Simian discussion but quoting here when it pertains is NOT A PROBLEM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 28, 2007, 04:38:07 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)
I think we all got wacked by the "other side".  But I guess we are all pretty much used to that.  LOLOL

And they didn't even try to make the email sound like him! lol

But I was still glad to get the confirmation that it was a phish job. It bothered me that there was even a tiny possibility that he needed our help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 04:39:22 PM
 :smt103 eldwean lampe has a gun  :shock:
http://member.zebo.com/Main?event_key=DIAL&execCode=WISHLIST&aId=2076232


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 04:41:39 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 04:43:03 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)
I think we all got wacked by the "other side".  But I guess we are all pretty much used to that.  LOLOL

??? huh?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 04:48:23 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.

All very good questions.

We have been TOLD that the family will be given the records, but that came from Aurba and Dutch 'experts', so who really knows.  Even if the family gets information how would they ever know if they received it all.  That's the 'beauty' of secret societies. 

Aruba may want to keep the case open because if they close it without a definitive resolution tourism will not recover any time soon.  This way it appears they are trying to solve it.

Bachus is a politician.  Politicians attach themselves to the issue du jour.  Natalee has faded from the headlines and Bachus has moved on.

jmho.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 28, 2007, 04:57:10 PM
:smt103 eldwean lampe has a gun  :shock:
http://member.zebo.com/Main?event_key=DIAL&execCode=WISHLIST&aId=2076232

Thats not really Eldwean, his friend put "HIS" pic up on Eldweans space.  Why?  I have no idea


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 04:57:32 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.

I think the family will have access to those files...if anyone.  Whether it happens is any body's guess.  Thanks to the Kalpoes (never thought I would say that) we now know about other PV's that are there...so that would be reason enough not to close this case as just another cold case.  IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 28, 2007, 04:58:41 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)
I think we all got wacked by the "other side".  But I guess we are all pretty much used to that.  LOLOL


And they didn't even try to make the email sound like him! lol

But I was still glad to get the confirmation that it was a phish job. It bothered me that there was even a tiny possibility that he needed our help.
Me too, and no it didnt even sound like him.  LOLOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SunFreak2 on August 28, 2007, 05:11:25 PM
From page 120 of Dave's book:
 
"the following information is extremely curious to me, and it is something that has to be looked into further.  It involves someone from inside of the Aruban Government.   Apparently, in discussing what he considered to be a "blunder in Natalee's case," former Police Commissioner Stanley Zaandam said that the nomination of certain police commissioners, including Dompig, was against the law and the hierarchy of the KPA (police corp.), and that there were "serious consequences for the integrity & quality of work in the KPA" due to that. He said, "None of the high-ranked commissioners has the qualifications nor experience to conduct a judicial investigation." He continued, saying, "this is how van der Stratten was appointed to this case."  He maintained that Natalee's case was not the type of work in which van der Stratten should have been involved.  However, he considers the biggest blunder to be the way the 3 boys, Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers, were questioned, saying that their lies allowed them to remain free for 12 days.  The part that most concerns me, though, was his statement that 2 days after Natalee's disappearance, her "body may have already been found and the police commissioner looked the other way to do a favor for Paulus van der Sloot...." He continued that "to exculpate the son of Paulus, the police commissioner and the fiscal chief prosecutor.....made the false arrest of 2 secirity guards, calling this a tactical maneuver...."




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 05:15:24 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.

All very good questions.

We have been TOLD that the family will be given the records, but that came from Aurba and Dutch 'experts', so who really knows.  Even if the family gets information how would they ever know if they received it all.  That's the 'beauty' of secret societies. 

Aruba may want to keep the case open because if they close it without a definitive resolution tourism will not recover any time soon.  This way it appears they are trying to solve it.

Bachus is a politician.  Politicians attach themselves to the issue du jour.  Natalee has faded from the headlines and Bachus has moved on.

jmho.

They may want to keep the case open so they don't have to give Beth and Dave access to their files.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 05:22:53 PM

They may want to keep the case open so they don't have to give Beth and Dave access to their files.

Or that too.  Who knows what their intentions are down there other than don't let the truth be known?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Helen Back on August 28, 2007, 05:23:10 PM
While channel surfing today, I happened on a court TV story about the abduction of Linda Lee Daniels in 1986 in New Mexico.  I was not familiar with her story, but immediately drawn in.  A guy named Johnny Zinn made pornographic movies and "ordered" a blonde when the group had trouble recruiting willing participants.  Here's a short summary I found:

Zinn and His 'Product.'

Pornographers always tell us that porn is victimless.

This story proves differently.

In January of 1986, Linda Lee Daniels, 22, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, was kidnapped in broad daylight from her driveway by three young men, whose intent was to use her against her will in a pornographic movie.

The movie producer, Johnny Zinn, told these hirelings that he wanted a blonde "product" for his movie and that he would pay them $1,500 if they could find a woman who fit these specifications.

After they kidnapped Daniels, they drugged and raped her all night long (taking a film of the entire sequence of rapes). The following morning's papers carried Daniels' picture, so Zinn ordered his henchmen to kill her. They shot her repeatedly as she pleaded for her life.

Zinn received a life sentence. Two of the three accomplices, although found guilty of rape, are already free and roaming the streets, perhaps searching for more 'products.'[11]



The sickening part of the testimony of the underlings who flipped on Johnny Zinn, was that the plan originally did not include her murder.  However, her disappearance had generated too much media attention, and so Johnny Zinn ordered his flunkies to kill her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 05:25:17 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)

No, I didn't get it.  I think it was explained yesterday or the day before but go ahead and explain what happened again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 28, 2007, 05:26:53 PM
While channel surfing today, I happened on a court TV story about the abduction of Linda Lee Daniels in 1986 in New Mexico.  I was not familiar with her story, but immediately drawn in.  A guy named Johnny Zinn made pornographic movies and "ordered" a blonde when the group had trouble recruiting willing participants.  Here's a short summary I found:

Zinn and His 'Product.'

Pornographers always tell us that porn is victimless.

This story proves differently.

In January of 1986, Linda Lee Daniels, 22, of Albuquerque, New Mexico, was kidnapped in broad daylight from her driveway by three young men, whose intent was to use her against her will in a pornographic movie.

The movie producer, Johnny Zinn, told these hirelings that he wanted a blonde "product" for his movie and that he would pay them $1,500 if they could find a woman who fit these specifications.

After they kidnapped Daniels, they drugged and raped her all night long (taking a film of the entire sequence of rapes). The following morning's papers carried Daniels' picture, so Zinn ordered his henchmen to kill her. They shot her repeatedly as she pleaded for her life.

Zinn received a life sentence. Two of the three accomplices, although found guilty of rape, are already free and roaming the streets, perhaps searching for more 'products.'[11]



The sickening part of the testimony of the underlings who flipped on Johnny Zinn, was that the plan originally did not include her murder.  However, her disappearance had generated too much media attention, and so Johnny Zinn ordered his flunkies to kill her.

There are truly evil people out there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 28, 2007, 05:35:02 PM
Janssen a Moron?

Quite possible. JQK said she liked Dompig...another idiot.

Contradictory for sure. Refusing to step down while continuing to fail and fail and fail.

It was her silence, and that of the prosecuter's office that i find unforgivable. It provided a breeding ground for untold wild accusations and left Natalee without a voice on Aruba.
 


http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/08/karin-janssen.html

KARIN JANSSEN
Woman of the Year or Disgrace to her Profession?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 06:37:11 PM
You know, I've always liked Jossy, and think he's written some of the best pieces on this story and has published them, which is huge.

But...

his defense of Karin Janssen and Jan van der straaten always bothered me. Maybe Dana can ask him about this. It seems Jossy is very weak when it comes to explaining how he can support these 2.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 06:41:54 PM
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/712/popeyeiq1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 06:43:01 PM
You know, I've always liked Jossy, and think he's written some of the best pieces on this story and has published them, which is huge.

But...

his defense of Karin Janssen and Jan van der straaten always bothered me. Maybe Dana can ask him about this. It seems Jossy is very weak when it comes to explaining how he can support these 2.

or why he believes a young boy was buried out at the lighthouse for 2 yrs and still had flesh on the bones - filmed in Aru-bay videos.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on August 28, 2007, 06:45:30 PM
You know, I've always liked Jossy, and think he's written some of the best pieces on this story and has published them, which is huge.

But...

his defense of Karin Janssen and Jan van der straaten always bothered me. Maybe Dana can ask him about this. It seems Jossy is very weak when it comes to explaining how he can support these 2.

A little FYI here...Jossy still maintains that he has the utmost confidence in van der Straaten.  I keep asking the question too, Frank.  It is puzzling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 28, 2007, 06:50:16 PM
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/712/popeyeiq1.jpg)


I don't know if Paulus is he father or not but he damn sure looks like him...same hairline for one thing.  Klaas do you have any pics showing the two side by side?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 06:57:50 PM
That's what I don't get, how can a smart man have the utmost confidence in the 2 main players that have so utterly and completely failed Natalee, her family, Aruba and themselves?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 07:00:08 PM
C&C's at dusk


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 28, 2007, 07:01:39 PM
 :shock: oopsy....how dat happen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 28, 2007, 07:06:47 PM
That's what I don't get, how can a smart man have the utmost confidence in the 2 main players that have so utterly and completely failed Natalee, her family, Aruba and themselves?


True, these are the two main main players in the first months of the investigation, the two people that had more control over the investigation than anyone else, and their lack of appropriate and logical action is the reason the case has not been prosecuted to this day.

Jan van der Straten and Karin Jannsen queered the case, plain and simple. It doesn't make sense that Jossy would hang onto them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 28, 2007, 07:09:12 PM
That's what I don't get, how can a smart man have the utmost confidence in the 2 main players that have so utterly and completely failed Natalee, her family, Aruba and themselves?


The $64,000 question, Frank, is "Who was pushing their buttons?" Who were these Nazis goose stepping to?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 28, 2007, 07:11:09 PM
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/712/popeyeiq1.jpg)



ROFLMOA Kermit! Come to think of it we don't have pictures of them at the same at the same time bar in Aruba. Hmmmmm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 28, 2007, 07:19:19 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_33831.php

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/ArubaWaterSpoutNatalee.jpg)
Hi Monkeys
Klaas,this is truly beautiful.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 28, 2007, 07:43:45 PM
  Truthseeker2 Reading back, I've been looking for a statement Nadira made in which she said Satish hardly ever or never went out with Deepak. That same satatement said he was pacing about, excited, waiting for Deepak to come home.  This contradicted everything else we were told about him picking Deepak up from work that night.
   According to Sander's 6/16 PV he has known the Kalpoes a year and a half, and Koen goes to the movies with them.  Andre Santos PV says he has known Joran 6 years, Satish 2 and Deepak 1 year.
    I've been comparing the Kapoes' 5/31 PVs and until we get to the security guards their stories don't match. Their account of the guards is practically word for word, but details at C&C's totally different.  Deepak's account matches Joran's 6/9 PV, the first we have seen from him. Within 48 hours the brothers' stories don't match. Why?  Is it at all possible that Satish wasn't with Joran and Satish that night?
     

I don't think there is any doubt that Satish was with them on the night of 05/29 and early morning of 05/30.  But...trying to keep an open mind...could it have actually been Freddie that was with them instead of Satish and that is why Deepak has been so protective of Satish?  Freddie wasn't id'd so Satish was the one picked up.  ??????

I have seen a few discrepancies in the early stories based on the PV's, such as the one where Deepak says that Satish drove to CnC's and Deepak left the bar looking for J&S but did not find them at the car.  Deepak then says he sat down at the rear of the car and mis-called Satish.  Satish then comes out and gives Deepak the keys and returns to CnC's to get Joran.  This was only told one time.  Every other time it appears Deepak drives them to CnC's.  Is it significant?  I don't know.  Maybe.
Joran supposedly was surprised to see that Deepak brought Satish with him that night.Also,The gardener witness only ID'd Joran and Deepak sitting in the front seat of the Kalpoe car by the pond....if I recall correctly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 28, 2007, 07:57:31 PM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money. The girl bet U.S. $ 20,= in the game and I helped her win U.S. $ 100,= with it. After the girl had won U.S. $ 100,= I advised her to call it quits but she wanted to continue. I told her again that she should stop and her friends also said that she should stop. Probably the girl after that went to cash in her chips for money. The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".

From Jaime's June 17, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.



So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 
What it is is part of a pimps plans to go to C&C's long before any MB kids"begged"him to go.IMO Natalee was targeted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 28, 2007, 08:01:59 PM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

Well. to put Freddie with Joran that night you would need to leave out a Kalpoe.  Who says it has to be Satish?  Maybe Satish used Deepak's car????

Just playing around with this whole concept of Freddie versus one of the Kalpose....will have to give it some more thought.
Could have been both Freddy and Satish at C&C's.Joran targeted Natalee,Satish was with Deepak and Joran in the beginning of their night,Freddy just shows up at C&C's possible with a few other pimps.Satish could have been dropped off at home before their pimp game began and Freddy(and possible a few other pimps)had their sick fun with Natalee.Dropping Satish off at home before their sick games began could also be a way for Deepak to protect his brother.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: AZSunny on August 28, 2007, 08:21:56 PM

Could have been both Freddy and Satish at C&C's.Joran targeted Natalee,Satish was with Deepak and Joran in the beginning of their night,Freddy just shows up at C&C's possible with a few other pimps.Satish could have been dropped off at home before their pimp game began and Freddy(and possible a few other pimps)had their sick fun with Natalee.Dropping Satish off at home before their sick games began could also be a way for Deepak to protect his brother.
[/quote]

Wasn't there something about Deepak and Satish going to talk to "some friends" at C and C's?  could those friends have been Freddy and other pimps? One of them said they were talking to friends, and when he turned around he couldn't find the others and went out to the car.  I think that was Deepak.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 08:38:45 PM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money. The girl bet U.S. $ 20,= in the game and I helped her win U.S. $ 100,= with it. After the girl had won U.S. $ 100,= I advised her to call it quits but she wanted to continue. I told her again that she should stop and her friends also said that she should stop. Probably the girl after that went to cash in her chips for money. The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".

From Jaime's June 17, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.



So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 
What it is is part of a pimps plans to go to C&C's long before any MB kids"begged"him to go.IMO Natalee was targeted.

In other words, they were not invited by anyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 08:45:31 PM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

Well. to put Freddie with Joran that night you would need to leave out a Kalpoe.  Who says it has to be Satish?  Maybe Satish used Deepak's car????

Just playing around with this whole concept of Freddie versus one of the Kalpose....will have to give it some more thought.
Could have been both Freddy and Satish at C&C's.Joran targeted Natalee,Satish was with Deepak and Joran in the beginning of their night,Freddy just shows up at C&C's possible with a few other pimps.Satish could have been dropped off at home before their pimp game began and Freddy(and possible a few other pimps)had their sick fun with Natalee.Dropping Satish off at home before their sick games began could also be a way for Deepak to protect his brother.

Because freddy knows what paulus did.  jvds had to pass because she was a Virgin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Helen Back on August 28, 2007, 08:49:49 PM
That's what I don't get, how can a smart man have the utmost confidence in the 2 main players that have so utterly and completely failed Natalee, her family, Aruba and themselves?


The $64,000 question, Frank, is "Who was pushing their buttons?" Who were these Nazis goose stepping to?



I agree.  These two moved ahead with arresting the SG's even though they knew J2K had lied right out of the gate.  No forensics, perps running loose.  Even while J2k were detained, Janssen knew the "interrogations" were baloney and did nothing to insist on decent lines of questioning while they were in custody.  It was all for show.  I bet her arguments before the judges in the "closed" hearings were as limp as spaghetti.  By that time, everyone was turning on Beth, and attack the victim was the new strategy.  Who was calling the shots?

IMO Paulus was involved from the beginning and Natalee was singled out.  I have wondered every day what Paulus' involvement could have been?  My best guess is he has some really smarmy associates.  He's had some favors done for him, and he has done some favors for others.  There is a reason why he was booted out as a judge, and I bet it's all connected.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 08:51:01 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:
A friend of mine came walking up to me. His name is Eli and I don't know his last name. He used to me in my class at the MAVO/BAVO. Eli talked to me for about five to ten minutes. Eli then walked away. When I turned around Satish and Joran were nowhere to be seen. They hadn't even told that they were leaving. I looked for them for a short while, but hadn't found them. I was in the bathroom for a little while. I have no patience to look. After the bathroom I looked around somewhat. I walked past the bar, past the glass section where the "Carlos & Charlies" souvenirs of "Carlos & Charlie" are sold to the outside. When I was walking outside, I could hear the announcement that it was the last opportunity to buy alcohol. That is always announced before closing, I walked to my car. My car was the only one parked in the back of the parking lot. I went and sat in my car to wait for Satish and Joran. I had no more money left on my pre-paid phone to call them.

FYI - Deepak's June 9th statement is worth disecting again, IMO
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=213.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:01:20 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

It wasn't the first time that I had girls in my car that were on vacation and dropped them off at hotels. I looked in front of me and asked Joran in Papiamentu what were we going to do. Joran answered in Papiamentu drive around. I backed up my car, drove from the parking lot and then past "Carlos & Charlies" twice. I had the volume of my car radio turned up pretty high. To understand each other we had to talk loudly. During the two times that we drove past "Carlos & Charlies" I hadn't spoken to the girl. I only talked to my brother. When I was going to pass by Carlos & Charlies for the third time I saw a police van on the corner. I wasn't wearing my seatbelt and because of that I turned into the other direction. I decided to Turn right instead of left, in the direction of   "Choose a Name". When I turned left we had to drive at walking pace because of a row of cars in front of me. During that time the girl stuck her head out of the car and yelled something. I had not understood what she had shouted. I looked into the direction she had been yelling to. I saw a group of people standing there, there were both boys and girls there. It was a group of more than ten people. I assumed that they belonged with her group. One of the boys responded and walked towards us. I hear the boy say: " What are you doing there. Are you crazy, get out of the car."(loosely translated: What are you doing. Are you nuts/crazy. Get out of that car). She didn't want to get out. I hadn't responded to it. I kept on driving at walking pace and stopped my car at the zebra crossing. I had done this because I thought it would be better if she went with her friends. To prevent problems because her friends clearly didn't want her coming with us. To your question as to what I mean by problems, I can state the following. The kind of problem that I have now gotten into. People would think that she would have gone with us against her will. She had been more drunk than she had been previously. I thought that she talked too much. She talked pretty loud, I could not hear what she was talking about. I had told her in English that if her friends thought it better she'd go with them, that it would be best if she did. She refused to go with them. She said I could also drop her off, seeing as I owned a car


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:13:56 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

According to me Joran said to her that we were at the hotel. She got out. I had not seen this. I heard something fall. I heard Joran say in Papiamentu shit she has fallen down. Joran exited through the same car door as where she had fallen down to help her up. That was the right back door. I had seen the girl on the ground. I saw Joran help her. I saw that the girl turned around and pushed Joran into the car. I heard that she said something to Joran. I was unable to hear what she had said to Joran. The car radio had been turned down somewhat, the volume was maybe at the nine level or something like that. Joran looked surprised. She walked away from Joran. What I saw is that she was walking towards the lobby. I did not see her enter the lobby. I saw that she leaned against a pillar with one hand. Joran had gotten back into the car and was sitting behind Satish. In the lobby I saw a man walking up to the girl. I saw that he had a radio in his left hand. I assumed that he was talking into the radio because he held it closely in front of his mouth. It was a dark coloured man. He was fairly tall. He wore a black T-shirt and black pants.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 28, 2007, 09:18:32 PM
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/712/popeyeiq1.jpg)



ROFLMOA Kermit! Come to think of it we don't have pictures of them at the same at the same time bar in Aruba. Hmmmmm.


how old is this guy?  he looks 45 yrs. old.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 09:18:50 PM
Driving away...

Deepak 6/9 makes it seem like he knew something bad was going to happen. He was worried about this...and scared about that...driving in circles...avoiding the visibility team.

What's with all the concern? The feeling of guilt...beforehand...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:22:36 PM
Dennis - he's in his late 20's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 28, 2007, 09:23:34 PM
The supposedly secretly taped conversation amongst the JK2 while in police custody where Deepak says "your own father - unbelievable" indicates to me that Paulus was involved in the gang rape.  And that fits into Janet's theory of how this all went down.  After they all abused Natalee, they left to dump her on the beach but along the way she died.  Paulus simply went to bed afterwards.
That's why it wasn't so difficult to call PVDS to help with strategy on what to do, after all he was party to rape. 
If PVDS was just involved in the coverup, Deepak doesn't say "your own father - unbelievable".  Paulus had to parttake in the perversion of the original crime to cause Deepak to make that statement.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:23:51 PM
Driving away...

Deepak 6/9 makes it seem like he knew something bad was going to happen. He was worried about this...and scared about that...driving in circles...avoiding the visibility team.

What's with all the concern? The feeling of guilt...beforehand...
I don't know about feeling of guilt before hand because we know his entire June 9th statement is FOS.  BUT...it does appear some guilt was showing through all the lies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:24:46 PM
The supposedly secretly taped conversation amongst the JK2 while in police custody where Deepak says "your own father - unbelievable" indicates to me that Paulus was involved in the gang rape.  And that fits into Janet's theory of how this all went down.  After they all abused Natalee, they left to dump her on the beach but along the way she died.  Paulus simply went to bed afterwards.
That's why it wasn't so difficult to call PVDS to help with strategy on what to do, after all he was party to rape. 
If PVDS was just involved in the coverup, Deepak doesn't say "your own father - unbelievable".  Paulus had to parttake in the perversion of the original crime to cause Deepak to make that statement.



Sickening as it sounds it sure appears that way.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 28, 2007, 09:26:51 PM
Dennis - he's in his late 20's


he looks like he spends a lot of time dipping into his own product line.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 28, 2007, 09:31:39 PM
Such a crock of $?@! 27 months later and still they havent been honest what these punks were doing that night!!They get to the bar at 12:30AM and 15 minutes later Deepak is already outside as he doesnt have a drink,doesnt dance and all he does is talk to a friend for 5-10 minutes and goes to the bathroom.

His whole purpose of going to C&C was what?? Picking up and driving Joran to the bar so he could have a drink?? He lost patience looking for his Brother and Joran..Yeh right!! We have all seen the bar and it isnt all that big..It was all premeditated and his whole job was to have that car ready as the drugged drink was administered by last call. The plan was already set in motion as Joran played himself off as a exchange student from holland staying at there same hotel. Get her in the car and let the pimp games begin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 09:35:07 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

According to me Joran said to her that we were at the hotel. She got out. I had not seen this. I heard something fall. I heard Joran say in Papiamentu shit she has fallen down. Joran exited through the same car door as where she had fallen down to help her up. That was the right back door. I had seen the girl on the ground. I saw Joran help her. I saw that the girl turned around and pushed Joran into the car. I heard that she said something to Joran. I was unable to hear what she had said to Joran. The car radio had been turned down somewhat, the volume was maybe at the nine level or something like that. Joran looked surprised. She walked away from Joran. What I saw is that she was walking towards the lobby. I did not see her enter the lobby. I saw that she leaned against a pillar with one hand. Joran had gotten back into the car and was sitting behind Satish. In the lobby I saw a man walking up to the girl. I saw that he had a radio in his left hand. I assumed that he was talking into the radio because he held it closely in front of his mouth. It was a dark coloured man. He was fairly tall. He wore a black T-shirt and black pants.



it is ALL a LIE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 28, 2007, 09:35:41 PM
Such a crock of $?@! 27 months later and still they havent been honest what these punks were doing that night!!They get to the bar at 12:30AM and 15 minutes later Deepak is already outside as he doesnt have a drink,doesnt dance and all he does is talk to a friend for 5-10 minutes and goes to the bathroom.

His whole purpose of going to C&C was what?? Picking up and driving Joran to the bar so he could have a drink?? He lost patience looking for his Brother and Joran..Yeh right!! We have all seen the bar and it isnt all that big..It was all premeditated and his whole job was to have that car ready as the drugged drink was administered by last call. The plan was already set in motion as Joran played himself off as a exchange student from holland staying at there same hotel. Get her in the car and let the pimp games begin.

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!  Practiced many times over the years by young Pervs/Pimps.  Joran was the FU that ruined the gig. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 09:36:07 PM
Such a crock of $?@! 27 months later and still they havent been honest what these punks were doing that night!!They get to the bar at 12:30AM and 15 minutes later Deepak is already outside as he doesnt have a drink,doesnt dance and all he does is talk to a friend for 5-10 minutes and goes to the bathroom.

His whole purpose of going to C&C was what?? Picking up and driving Joran to the bar so he could have a drink?? He lost patience looking for his Brother and Joran..Yeh right!! We have all seen the bar and it isnt all that big..It was all premeditated and his whole job was to have that car ready as the drugged drink was administered by last call. The plan was already set in motion as Joran played himself off as a exchange student from holland staying at there same hotel. Get her in the car and let the pimp games begin.


BINGO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:38:43 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 09:41:51 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
yup!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 28, 2007, 09:44:16 PM
FYI Monkeys ...
As I have always stated there is a reason why we do things here and why we implement certain formats for discussion and the sharing of information.
We had mentioned a family member had contacted us. This is a heads up and more details will be forth coming as to a more exact data and time.
However, Natalee Holloway's uncle, Paul Reynolds, will be coming on Scared Monkeys forum this week to discuss some issues and ask for our help.
This is a great opportunity to help the family. He had contacted my many weeks back and I said that SM would be more than willing to lend a hand.
Any word yet on this?  Seems like we're always in the wait and disapointment mode. We are all biting at the bit to help and do something, you'd think instead of teasers to keep us hanging on there would be something we could sink out teeth into.
Seems like all we get are extended promisesI want so badly to help out but I have to admit all it seems is just "Something big is Coming" and it never comes. 
 

AS RED stated, Paul Reynolds is going to be posting here... it will probably be next week... he like all of us, is busy.  I am sure he will be here though, because he contacted us....
and don't lose faith... TIM is searching for other missing people now in OH... read DiHannah's and Marlee's accounts on that....it's quite uplifting (or it was to me)
and just keep having faith that it will happen, because it will.

So now it's next week, I trust you get my point.  Believe me, I'm not trying to be negative here, its just that everytime there's a promise of something we can sink out teeth into, it never happens.
I juat can't imagine how family could be "busy" and have to delay any kind of an important announcement.  I mean I'm busy too, but nothing keeps me away from here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:45:58 PM
Deepak's June 10th Statement:

To your question whether or not we pick up girls when we go for example to "Carlos & Charlies", I can state the following. Yes, we from time to time pick up girls there.

To your question whether these are local girls or tourists, I can state the following. They are tourists.[/b]To your question as to who is the one who makes the first move towards the girls we are going to pick up, I can state the following. It usually is Joran or another friend with the name Freddy Zedan.

To your question as to what role Joran plays in our circle of friends, I can state the following. He has no real role. We are all the same.

To your question as to where we take the girls we pick up, I can state the following. Sometimes the girls stay at "Carlos & Charlies" or sometimes we take them to their hotel.

To your question was to what exactly happens when we have picked up the girls, I can state the following. Just kissing and dancing.

To your question whether sexual intercourse has happened, I can state the following. Yes, it has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that all of us, so in one room, had sexual intercourse, I can state the following. It has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that the three of us had sexual intercourse with a girl, I can state the following. That has never happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:48:22 PM
Deepak's June 10th Statement:

To your question as to why I reasonably quickly had an attorney, I can state the following. After we were heard as witnesses, Joran's father said that there would be chance that we were going to be arrested and that we had to prepare for that eventuality.

To you question as to how we prepared ourselves, I can state the following. With preparing I just meant looking for an attorney.

To your question whether I had spoken to my attorney prior to my arrest, I can state the following. Both families had a meeting with the attorneys. So my parents with me and my brother and Joran with his parents.

To your question as to when that had taken place, I can state the following. That took place last Saturday.

To your question as to where it took place, I can state the following. It took place in the offices of my attorney.

To your question whether both families went to one office or to several offices, I can state the following. We all went to the same office at the same time. Our attorney asked us if the statement we had made as witnesses was the truth and said that we should stick to that story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 28, 2007, 09:48:52 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
The Falling Down and hurting her head statement is all about covering-up for some kind of brutality, but what I find most interesting about this is they must have thought there was some chance Natalee might be found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 28, 2007, 09:52:16 PM
 :salut:
Alarm is set for 4:30, see yall tomorrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:52:56 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:


"I am now willing to make a statement that is in accordance with the truth. Several details were missing from my last statement. I am going to tell you exactly what happened that night. On Sunday May 29th 2005 at approximately 21:50 hours, I was called by my friend Joran. He said that he was in the vicinity of the Mc. Donalds on Palm Beach and that he was waiting for his father. He further told me that he had met girls in the casino and that these girls would be going to "Carlos & Charlie's" and whether I wanted to go with him. I said that it was OK/fine and that I would pick him up after I went home at his place. I was picked up by my brother Satïsh at the place where I work. We then went to the "Taco Bell" situated in Santa Cruz. There we bought something to eat and then we drove home. On the way home I was bitten by ants in my car. I had told my brother that when we got back home, we should clean the car because if there were going to be girls in the car they would be bitten by ants too.

On your question whether we had agreed that there were going to be girls in the car, I can say the following. We had not agreed anything, but I just thought like just in case that would happen.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 28, 2007, 09:53:21 PM
Dayhiker,

I just don't think anyone was "pushing their button." I mean this is the Chief of Police and the Head Prosecutor! To think they were bullied is giving them a break and I just don't see it. They were the Dutch friends, I mean they worked with Paulus, were all Dutch and we are to believe they were bullied?

No way, they were part of this coverup. van der straaten could have taken all of them in on that first night and secured the property. Janssen and van der straaten simply would not have bought a lie for ten days if it was anyone else.

Look at the way they treated the guards. They are complicit, period.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 09:53:52 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.

yes, i agree totally

but i was just stating that it was all a lie

mixed in with some half baked truths  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 09:54:17 PM
To your question whether it ever happened that all of us, so in one room, had sexual intercourse, I can state the following. It has happened.
Joran makes a point to say that he never saw Deepak and Satish with girls, no girlfriends, that he saw Satish dance with a girl...once. I guess Deepak is talking about dudes here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 09:56:24 PM
:salut:
Alarm is set for 4:30, see yall tomorrow.

Nite Indy


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 09:56:30 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
The Falling Down and hurting her head statement is all about covering-up for some kind of brutality, but what I find most interesting about this is they must have thought there was some chance Natalee might be found.

yep :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 09:57:28 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
The Falling Down and hurting her head statement is all about covering-up for some kind of brutality, but what I find most interesting about this is they must have thought there was some chance Natalee might be found.
Excellent point. Now that begs the question -- when did Paulus become so cock-sure of "no body - no case?" At what point did Deepak feel he still needed to "cover" for Joran's and Natalee's "injuries?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:01:21 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

We left Joran's place between 00:15 and 00:20 hours for "Carlos & Charlies". At that time my brother was driving. I was in the front seat and Joran was in the back. We arrived at "Carlos Si Charlie's” at approximately  00:30. My brother had parked the car on the parking lot behind "Carlos & Charlie's. We then walked in the direction of "Carlos & Charlies". In front of  "Carlos & Charlie's there was a group of girls. Joran had noticed that these girls were also part of the group he met at the casino. Joran had greeted the girls and then we walked into "Carlos & Charlie's. When we got inside we walked to the bar. At the bar Joran talked to a boy I know by face only. He had bought a drink for him and the boy. The drink is called "Carribean  Motherfxxxxx".

To your question as to what kind of drink that is, I can say the following. This drink is beer with a shot of "151" vodka in a small glass inside the glass of beer. Joran had asked us if we wanted one too, we hadn't taken him up on his offer. Then he had bought us three "Yards" with whisky coke. He payed for the drinks. We then walked towards the stage/podium. We stood in front of the podium. On the podium there was a group of girls that were dancing. One of the girls made a hand gesture towards Joran, inviting him to come and dance with her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 28, 2007, 10:06:02 PM
Such a crock of $?@! 27 months later and still they havent been honest what these punks were doing that night!!They get to the bar at 12:30AM and 15 minutes later Deepak is already outside as he doesnt have a drink,doesnt dance and all he does is talk to a friend for 5-10 minutes and goes to the bathroom.

His whole purpose of going to C&C was what?? Picking up and driving Joran to the bar so he could have a drink?? He lost patience looking for his Brother and Joran..Yeh right!! We have all seen the bar and it isnt all that big..It was all premeditated and his whole job was to have that car ready as the drugged drink was administered by last call. The plan was already set in motion as Joran played himself off as a exchange student from holland staying at there same hotel. Get her in the car and let the pimp games begin.


*******, kudos, I don't think I've ever seen the Kalpoes' role summed up so well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 10:12:55 PM
Excellent point. Now that begs the question -- when did Paulus become so cock-sure of "no body - no case?" At what point did Deepak feel he still needed to "cover" for Joran's and Natalee's "injuries?"
Paulus knew early. In the first day (or days), depending on the Janssen quote of your choosing. No body / no case.

Monday afternoon Joran tells Freddy a beach version, falling...stumbling...does not *recover*.
Tuesday afternoon the Kalpoes give their statements...stumbling...falling to the ground.

I go with monday evening...a second group. Joran/Paulus know but the Kalpoes don't. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 28, 2007, 10:15:34 PM
Dayhiker,

I just don't think anyone was "pushing their button." I mean this is the Chief of Police and the Head Prosecutor! To think they were bullied is giving them a break and I just don't see it. They were the Dutch friends, I mean they worked with Paulus, were all Dutch and we are to believe they were bullied?

No way, they were part of this coverup. van der straaten could have taken all of them in on that first night and secured the property. Janssen and van der straaten simply would not have bought a lie for ten days if it was anyone else.

Look at the way they treated the guards. They are complicit, period.


Jannsen and Van der Straten certainly carried the Van der Sloots through until June 10th, but then the big boys took over to complete the cover-up. IMO, there had to be someone in ALE above Van der Straten that enabled the queered investigation to continue. Any honest Police Chief above him wouldn't have allowed it to happen, so somebody upstairs was allowing him to have his way. Or were they orchestrating it?

All Jannsen had to do is keep her lips shut under the auspices of Dutch law and make sure the judges didn't get anything that would implicate the suspects J2K2. Hence the decisions going the Van der Sloots way all the time. Throw in a whole nest of Paulus' Dutch Judiciary co-workers and Natalee didn't stand a chance at justice. The whole system is corrupt to hell and back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 10:17:35 PM
Excellent point. Now that begs the question -- when did Paulus become so cock-sure of "no body - no case?" At what point did Deepak feel he still needed to "cover" for Joran's and Natalee's "injuries?"
Paulus knew early. In the first day (or days), depending on the Janssen quote of your choosing. No body / no case.

Monday afternoon Joran tells Freddy a beach version, falling...stumbling...does not *recover*.
Tuesday afternoon the Kalpoes give their statements...stumbling...falling to the ground.

I go with monday evening...a second group. Joran/Paulus know but the Kalpoes don't. 

We are on the same page.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:18:48 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

I then searched for them in the club but without result. Then I went to look near the bathrooms. I also didn't find them there, I then used the bathroom myself. . After I walked out of the bathroom, I called Joran on his mobile phone. He did not answer. I walked to the parking lot where my car was parked. When I arrived at my car I sat on the ground next to my car, because my brother had the keys. I then called my brother on his mobile phone. I had almot no more minutes on my pre-paid phone so I called him in a way that produces what in English is called a “miss call”. After that my brother phoned me back, I asked him where they were and he said they were still inside and that he would come. After a while Satish came walking, I asked him where Joran was and he said that Joran was still inside. I told Satish to give me the keys and to go find Joran. Satish left again and I got into my car. I stayed inside of the car with the door open. I had one leg outside the car and I was playing music and adjusting my radio set-up. After a while I heard the door on the passenger side open. I saw Satish getting into the car. Joran opened the door behind Satish and also got into the car. I cannot remember if the girl got into the same car door. I do know that she sat down behind me. I turned around somewhat and introduced myself to the girl. She had told me that her name was Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 10:20:39 PM
Excellent point. Now that begs the question -- when did Paulus become so cock-sure of "no body - no case?" At what point did Deepak feel he still needed to "cover" for Joran's and Natalee's "injuries?"
Paulus knew early. In the first day (or days), depending on the Janssen quote of your choosing. No body / no case.

Monday afternoon Joran tells Freddy a beach version, falling...stumbling...does not *recover*.
Tuesday afternoon the Kalpoes give their statements...stumbling...falling to the ground.

I go with monday evening...a second group. Joran/Paulus know but the Kalpoes don't. 

We are on the same page.



 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 28, 2007, 10:21:52 PM
klaas - would it be totally inappropriate to post what happened to the "Volunteers" email address? (Did you get the phished email?)
I think we all got wacked by the "other side".  But I guess we are all pretty much used to that.  LOLOL


And they didn't even try to make the email sound like him! lol

But I was still glad to get the confirmation that it was a phish job. It bothered me that there was even a tiny possibility that he needed our help.
Me too, and no it didnt even sound like him.  LOLOL
Well, I got that email. I didn't know it was a Phishing thing. I did get a reply from
Vicki. Whew, I thought R had lost it. She said he was ok, I said, I hope he has someone to look out for him! Like I am thinking a relative with the signing powers who can er...  sign the papers to make him go away and get better against his will. Have some things on my mind ( real stuff , not made up stuff ) . Frankly I didn't know what to make of it and didn't want to post anything in a public place, thinking, Oh poor R !

lol, sense of relief. all of that and more


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:23:24 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

On the way to the "Lighthouse" me and my brother sat in front and talked and Joran and the girl were in the back and talked. I could not hear what they were talking about. At approximately where the “La Cabana Hotel” was, Satish popped in a DVD that had nude scenes in it. The girl said in English “Oh my God, whats that” (loosely translated by reporting officer: Oh my God, What is that). I then said to Joran in English: “Now she is going to think that we're perverts (loosely translated by reporting officer: Now the girls is going to think we are perverts). After a while Joran said to Satish in Dutch. “Switch off the DVD, she has had enough of it. Satish complied with the request. I had been driving on, in the direction of Arashi. When I arrived at Arashi I stopped the car on the asphalted section. I got out because I had to take a pee.

Again?  Didn't he just use the bathroom at CnC?  So he must know his car was seen in the Arashi area.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:28:27 PM
Dayhiker,

I just don't think anyone was "pushing their button." I mean this is the Chief of Police and the Head Prosecutor! To think they were bullied is giving them a break and I just don't see it. They were the Dutch friends, I mean they worked with Paulus, were all Dutch and we are to believe they were bullied?

No way, they were part of this coverup. van der straaten could have taken all of them in on that first night and secured the property. Janssen and van der straaten simply would not have bought a lie for ten days if it was anyone else.

Look at the way they treated the guards. They are complicit, period.

Frank, I would have to agree.

It's also good to see you again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 10:29:18 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 28, 2007, 10:29:22 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

On the way to the "Lighthouse" me and my brother sat in front and talked and Joran and the girl were in the back and talked. I could not hear what they were talking about. At approximately where the “La Cabana Hotel” was, Satish popped in a DVD that had nude scenes in it. The girl said in English “Oh my God, whats that” (loosely translated by reporting officer: Oh my God, What is that). I then said to Joran in English: “Now she is going to think that we're perverts (loosely translated by reporting officer: Now the girls is going to think we are perverts). After a while Joran said to Satish in Dutch. “Switch off the DVD, she has had enough of it. Satish complied with the request. I had been driving on, in the direction of Arashi. When I arrived at Arashi I stopped the car on the asphalted section. I got out because I had to take a pee.

Again?  Didn't he just use the bathroom at CnC?  So he must know his car was seen in the Arashi area.

I see you point.  But, didn't he drink a yard of whiskey coke?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 28, 2007, 10:29:59 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

On the way to the "Lighthouse" me and my brother sat in front and talked and Joran and the girl were in the back and talked. I could not hear what they were talking about. At approximately where the “La Cabana Hotel” was, Satish popped in a DVD that had nude scenes in it. The girl said in English “Oh my God, whats that” (loosely translated by reporting officer: Oh my God, What is that). I then said to Joran in English: “Now she is going to think that we're perverts (loosely translated by reporting officer: Now the girls is going to think we are perverts). After a while Joran said to Satish in Dutch. “Switch off the DVD, she has had enough of it. Satish complied with the request. I had been driving on, in the direction of Arashi. When I arrived at Arashi I stopped the car on the asphalted section. I got out because I had to take a pee.

Again?  Didn't he just use the bathroom at CnC?  So he must know his car was seen in the Arashi area.
PPL saw the car that night... they just either are afraid or they didn't know what they saw. IMO The car was a one of a kind in Aruba and well known to the teenagers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on August 28, 2007, 10:30:01 PM
Correction *your     (I see your point)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:32:49 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

On the way to the "Lighthouse" me and my brother sat in front and talked and Joran and the girl were in the back and talked. I could not hear what they were talking about. At approximately where the “La Cabana Hotel” was, Satish popped in a DVD that had nude scenes in it. The girl said in English “Oh my God, whats that” (loosely translated by reporting officer: Oh my God, What is that). I then said to Joran in English: “Now she is going to think that we're perverts (loosely translated by reporting officer: Now the girls is going to think we are perverts). After a while Joran said to Satish in Dutch. “Switch off the DVD, she has had enough of it. Satish complied with the request. I had been driving on, in the direction of Arashi. When I arrived at Arashi I stopped the car on the asphalted section. I got out because I had to take a pee.

Again?  Didn't he just use the bathroom at CnC?  So he must know his car was seen in the Arashi area.

I see you point.  But, didn't he drink a yard of whiskey coke?

OK, so who took the picture of Nat climbing back into the car,? Or was that photo staged?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:33:55 PM
I appologize! 

Hey all ya'll!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 10:37:56 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?
NO! Neither Joran or Satish have ever mentioned this in their statements!  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:42:46 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?
NO! Neither Joran or Satish have ever mentioned this in their statements!  :wink:

Good catch!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:44:38 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

When we drove past the front I said, here we are this is the “Lighthouse”. Nobody answered me. At some point I looked into the rear view mirror and saw that Joran and the girl were French kissing. I had not seen that Joran had his hand up the girls skirt. I only saw him kissing. I looked at my brother Satish. He said keep on driving. After that I continued in the direction from which we just came. I saw a little farther up at about where the Lighthouse was a green jeep and a four door, white car. After that I drove down the road towards Arashi. Arriving at the Smith Boulevard on the section of road that has no lighting, I asked Joran if I should head back to town. Joran said no, no, let me out here. That was in the vicinity of the “Marriot Hotel”. I asked, where is here. He said here. I turned into a side street. To your question as to what kind of a road it was, I can say the following. I am not sure if it was a sand/dirt road or a paved road. I am willing to show you where the street is that I just mentioned.

As to your question how far I drove into the afore mentioned street, I can say the following, I think I drove about 55 yards into that street. Joran said that I should let him out there. After that I brought my car to a full stop. Joran got out first and then the girl. He said: Fine, I will see you tomorrow. I asked him how he would get home. He said that he would find a way to get home. I said, and the girl. He answered, I will drop her off at the “Holiday Inn Hotel”, we will walk along the beach and it is very close by. I had asked him, sure. He answered yes, I will see you tomorrow. I do remember that I saw them walking off hand in hand. I drove out of the street to get back onto the road and proceeded driving into the direction of my house. I do remember that in front of the “Marriot Hotel” Satish asked me to stop momentarily. I did what he asked me, Satish rolled down his window and threw out the two “Yards”. After that we drove until we got to the roundabout near “Texaco Sasakr”. At the roundabout I headed due east in the direction of my house at Hooiberg.
To your question as to how late we got home, I can say the following. We arrived home approximately 02.20 hours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:45:43 PM
G'night ya'll.  Keep the faith!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:47:43 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

When we got home Satish immediately went to bed. I had switched on the television. I had also turned on the computer in my room. I went and chatted with a friend of mine on “MSN”. His name is John Chartes Croes. I had told the afore mentioned CROES during the chat that we had gone out and that I was waiting for a friend of mine because I had dropped him off on the street together with a girl. (why? Joran had just said see you tomorrow?  Joran said he would find a way home?)

To your question as to why I was waiting for Joran, I can say the following. We always do that if one of us has stayed on the street we wait. To your question as to what does that waiting comprises of, I can say the following. Waiting means that we call each other and say everything is fine. (BS)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:48:01 PM
G'night ya'll.  Keep the faith!
Nite Gunslinger


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:50:04 PM
Stop me if you guys have had enough of these statement  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 10:51:24 PM
Stop me if you guys have had enough of these statement  :wink:
keep it rollin'!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:52:17 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

After having chatted with John I went into the living room and watched TV. Between 02.45 and 03.15 hours, I cannot remember the exact time it was, Joran phoned me. He asked me what I was doing. I answered that I was watching television. I asked him, and you? He answered that he was at that moment in time walking home. I then said to him, you see if you had stayed with me, you could have gotten a ride home. I then asked him, and how did it go. He said to me, no man, we just went into the water. After that according to Joran the girl had fallen asleep on the beach. He said he had left her there. He did not say to me where this took place. At that point I got angry at Joran and asked him, why he left that girl on the beach. After that he said that he was walking home barefoot. I then said, what do you mean, you are walking home barefoot and I asked him where his sneakers/sport shoes were. He answered that he had left his sneakers/sport shoes at the beach. I had told him that at that moment I didn't understand what he was talking about, but that if he got home he should call me. After that I sent him a message via the M.A.S. System of SETAR. The message said: when you get home you should come online. I am waiting for you and then I am going to sleep.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 10:55:16 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?
NO! Neither Joran or Satish have ever mentioned this in their statements!  :wink:

Good catch!!!
Thanks gun! And now the Kalpoes have removed the lighthouse visit? Does Arashi = lighthouse? Did Deepak really say he got out of the car to pee at a particular place...and then say...wait...we did not even go there?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:58:03 PM
G'night ya'll.  Keep the faith!
Nite Gunslinger

Good nite Eagle Klass!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 10:58:11 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

To you question as to how long me and Joran talked when he phoned, I can say the following. I estimate that we talked about 4 to 5 minutes. We also talked about whether I would go to work the next day and other stuff. (why?? what does going to work have to do with anything?)

After this I went back to "chatting" on the computer with my friend John. I had told John that I needed to wait up for Joran and that he was walking home.. John had noted that it was good for Joran because if he had driven with me, he wouldn't have to walk home now.

I went to the bathroom for a while. (AGAIN? Deepak must have a bladder infection) When I got back I could see that Joran had been “online”. He had sent me several messages. The messages were, I am already here and thanks for waiting, I will see you tomorrow..After a while I went to sleep.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 10:58:22 PM
It's always struck me as ridiculous that these boys were calling each other to confirm that they were home. That is what girls do--in my single days, I called my mom or a girlfriend if I was alone and getting in late. Teenage boys just do not do that, for any other reason than to establish an alibi.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 28, 2007, 10:58:40 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?
NO! Neither Joran or Satish have ever mentioned this in their statements!  :wink:

Good catch!!!
Thanks gun! And now the Kalpoes have removed the lighthouse visit? Does Arashi = lighthouse? Did Deepak really say he got out of the car to pee at a particular place...and then say...wait...we did not even go there?

You are welcome igs!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 11:00:44 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?
NO! Neither Joran or Satish have ever mentioned this in their statements!  :wink:

Good catch!!!
Thanks gun! And now the Kalpoes have removed the lighthouse visit? Does Arashi = lighthouse? Did Deepak really say he got out of the car to pee at a particular place...and then say...wait...we did not even go there?

..and further, Joran to this day swears "Satish" picked him at the beach (after first swearing "Deepak" picked him up at the beach) and the Kalpoes swear (via their attorney) that NEITHER of them picked-up Joran! ............... How in the HELL are these LIARS allowed to walk free????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Sue on August 28, 2007, 11:01:18 PM
I went to the bathroom for a while. (AGAIN? Deepak must have a bladder infection) When I got back I could see that Joran had been “online”. He had sent me several messages. The messages were, I am already here and thanks for waiting, I will see you tomorrow..After a while I went to sleep.




either that or totally FULL of Crap  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 28, 2007, 11:04:41 PM
It's always struck me as ridiculous that these boys were calling each other to confirm that they were home. That is what girls do--in my single days, I called my mom or a girlfriend if I was alone and getting in late. Teenage boys just do not do that, for any other reason than to establish an alibi.
Correct BKG! Funny, in Joran's book he says that the Kalpoes computer records do not prove that it was actually them that were on-line. I don't think he wants to go there...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 11:05:19 PM
Quote
either that or totally FULL of Crap 

...uhhh ....that is why he went to the bathroom "for awhile"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:07:02 PM
David Kock - Kalpoe Brothers' Attorney
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' 
March 20, 2006

DAVID KOCK: ….. Oh, yes. To start it, they didn’t pick him up. Yes? So that’s a flagrant lie, if you say that. And he’s saying that that’s the story, that they—they—that he called Deepak, and afterwards, Satish came and picked him up, yes? That’s a lie.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11943269/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:08:26 PM
It's always struck me as ridiculous that these boys were calling each other to confirm that they were home. That is what girls do--in my single days, I called my mom or a girlfriend if I was alone and getting in late. Teenage boys just do not do that, for any other reason than to establish an alibi.
Correct BKG! Funny, in Joran's book he says that the Kalpoes computer records do not prove that it was actually them that were on-line. I don't think he wants to go there...

I haven't read Joran's book (on principle...although it would help me keep up on the boards)...who does he want us to believe was online posing as Deepak and Satish?

It's so clear that he's just putting out various versions of the story to confuse the investigation. That's one fact about the case that's patently obvious.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:08:51 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement;

To your question as to where the story with the security guard came into the picture, I can say the following. I had made-up that part of the story.
To your question whether I had thought about telling the truth that night, I can say the following. I had not told the truth because in the first place Joran had asked me not to, he is my friend and I was afraid of the police because I thought that I would get into trouble with the police.

To your question as to how Joran was on the day that we went to “Carlos & Charlies”, I can say the following. He was sociable, not aggressive. In one word sociable. I do not know how much he had drank.
To your question how Natalee was that night in “Carlos & Charlies”, I can say the following. She danced beautifully, I had lied in my previous statement about her being unsteady on her feet when she stepped off the podium/stage. That was beside the truth. She had a steady walk. According to my opinion she was reasonably with it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:10:58 PM
David Kock - Kalpoe Brothers' Attorney
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' 
March 20, 2006

DAVID KOCK: ….. Oh, yes. To start it, they didn’t pick him up. Yes? So that’s a flagrant lie, if you say that. And he’s saying that that’s the story, that they—they—that he called Deepak, and afterwards, Satish came and picked him up, yes? That’s a lie.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11943269/

What evidence is there that Paulus picked him up?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:11:11 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.

I agree Klassend and so does Mark Furman:

Mark Furhman on Greta...... August 3, 2005

And I'm going to tell you, you know, Greta, I have a suspicion that the lie about dropping them off at the hotel and she fell and hit her head — that is because blunt force trauma was used on Natalee's head. And I hate to say this, but they're accounting for injuries, if the body is found, that will be able to be attributed to dropping her off at the hotel. This smacks of the suspect is in custody and they dropped the ball. They lost the momentum. The kid's smarter than the cops.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,164649,00.html


Guido was arrested on the charges of battery.
 which tells you Karen Jansen knew.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 11:12:52 PM
keeep em coming


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:14:16 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

I just remembered something. If Joran says that we took him home, then that is not based on the truth. Because he had sent me a message that said that he would get online as soon as he got home. You should check my mobile phone to see if the message is still in there.

I also have to tell you that Joran was wearing white sneakers/sport shoes that night. If you search/investigate his home then you will see that the shoes aren't there. He had told me that he had theft them on the beach.
To your question whether I of if Joran told the story to someone else,   than I can say the following. I know Joran told his story to his friend named Freddy ZEDAN. Freddy lives behind Joran. His mobile phone number is inside my mobile phone.

To your question whether Joran told me what he had told Freddy, I can say the following. Joran told me that he had told Freddy the truth and the story that was made up. I know that he trusts Freddy more because they have known each other for a long time. If you go and talk to Freddy, he will tell you the made up story and maybe also the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:15:02 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.

I agree Klassend and so does Mark Furman:

Mark Furhman on Greta...... August 3, 2005

And I'm going to tell you, you know, Greta, I have a suspicion that the lie about dropping them off at the hotel and she fell and hit her head — that is because blunt force trauma was used on Natalee's head. And I hate to say this, but they're accounting for injuries, if the body is found, that will be able to be attributed to dropping her off at the hotel. This smacks of the suspect is in custody and they dropped the ball. They lost the momentum. The kid's smarter than the cops.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,164649,00.html


Guido was arrested on the charges of battery.
 which tells you Karen Jansen knew.






That explains those mysterious battery changes. I know we may never know why, but I can't help but wonder about a motive. Mistakes happen (I guess...) but why would they hurt her intentionally?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:17:15 PM
You know, when you're back reading to catch up, it's just overwhelming. IF those scumbags had simply had an innocent night and done nothing more than break an ettiquette standard by skipping out on a date, there just AIN'T no way the story would be so twisted and different, depending on who you asked. I mean, who picked you up is not a complicated question.

It occurred to me that it's very possible Joran's shoe is in the water. I'm beginning to think he was afraid it might wash ashore along with Natalee's remains.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:17:39 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

To your question as to how I think about Joran making statements against me and my brother, I can say the following. I think he that he did this to blame the whole thing on us.

To your question as to what I think happened to the girl or what Joran did to her, I can say the following, I think that he raped her and is afraid to state that. I don't think he murdered her.

To your question as to why I think he has raped her, I can say the following. I think that because he doesn't want to tell the truth. That is the only reason I can think of.

To your question whether Joran could have been involved with a rape some time before, I can say the following. I do not know. My brother told me once that a girl had said that she had been impregnated by Joran. I do not know what happened after that.

To your question whether the statement I have just made is entirely in accordance with the truth, I can say the following. My statement is in accordance with the truth. I swear to you that this is the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 11:18:47 PM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

I just remembered something. If Joran says that we took him home, then that is not based on the truth. Because he had sent me a message that said that he would get online as soon as he got home. You should check my mobile phone to see if the message is still in there.

I also have to tell you that Joran was wearing white sneakers/sport shoes that night. If you search/investigate his home then you will see that the shoes aren't there. He had told me that he had theft them on the beach.
To your question whether I of if Joran told the story to someone else,   than I can say the following. I know Joran told his story to his friend named Freddy ZEDAN. Freddy lives behind Joran. His mobile phone number is inside my mobile phone.

To your question whether Joran told me what he had told Freddy, I can say the following. Joran told me that he had told Freddy the truth and the story that was made up. I know that he trusts Freddy more because they have known each other for a long time. If you go and talk to Freddy, he will tell you the made up story and maybe also the truth.


okay, pardon my ignorance here............is this newly uncovered pv's?!?!?!? I think I have heard bits and pieces of this -- but not this much before!!!! :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 28, 2007, 11:19:18 PM
I think Natalee's head was injured going over the wall at the Sloot house, either before while drugged, or after she died.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:19:25 PM
David Kock - Kalpoe Brothers' Attorney
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' 
March 20, 2006

DAVID KOCK: ….. Oh, yes. To start it, they didn’t pick him up. Yes? So that’s a flagrant lie, if you say that. And he’s saying that that’s the story, that they—they—that he called Deepak, and afterwards, Satish came and picked him up, yes? That’s a lie.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11943269/

What evidence is there that Paulus picked him up?



ART: On May 30, Paulus told Beth, Jug and friends (at least 5 people) that he picked up Joran at 4 am -
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4221.0


 As for Paulus, sources say he is the person next to Natalie in the casino.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198887,00.html

GRETA: I am also curious whether Paul van der Sloot used his phone between midnight and 7 a.m. on May 30
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161474,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:20:11 PM
Does that mean there's a little Joran Jr. running around somewhere in the southern Caribbean?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:22:16 PM
I think Natalee's head was injured going over the wall at the Sloot house, either before while drugged, or after she died.

JORAN VAN DER SLOOT: "And at that point, when I called him between that, there was actually a point where I'd picked her to — you know, in a joking way, Like, OK, then I'm going to take you back to your hotel, if you don't want to go back. And she said, No, put me down. And so I put her down again"



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:23:42 PM
Does Satish ever mention Deepak getting out of the car? Peeing or otherwise?
NO! Neither Joran or Satish have ever mentioned this in their statements!  :wink:

Good catch!!!
Thanks gun! And now the Kalpoes have removed the lighthouse visit? Does Arashi = lighthouse? Did Deepak really say he got out of the car to pee at a particular place...and then say...wait...we did not even go there?

..and further, Joran to this day swears "Satish" picked him at the beach (after first swearing "Deepak" picked him up at the beach) and the Kalpoes swear (via their attorney) that NEITHER of them picked-up Joran! ............... How in the HELL are these LIARS allowed to walk free????????

Some evidence was not presented to the court.
And Judge Smid.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:24:21 PM

ART: On May 30, Paulus told Beth, Jug and friends (at least 5 people) that he picked up Joran at 4 am -
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4221.0


 As for Paulus, sources say he is the person next to Natalie in the casino.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198887,00.html

GRETA: I am also curious whether Paul van der Sloot used his phone between midnight and 7 a.m. on May 30
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161474,00.html

Thanks, Kermit--I thought I'd heard something about that. I think it behooves Joran to involve other people in what happened that night. I also think, given the maps I've seen on Joran's home in relation to the beach (and a personal experience in which I tried to walk from Palm/Eagle Beach back to the cruise ship dock) it would have taken Joran too long to walk home that night. Since Deepak was allegedly online...my money's on Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 28, 2007, 11:30:11 PM
Wreck - not new.  I think it's just easier to read in bits and pieces.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 11:33:13 PM
Wreck - not new.  I think it's just easier to read in bits and pieces.

Well, it does "slap you around" in bits and pieces!  Amazing, that this is what is out there and the ALE has "no clue"!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 11:35:29 PM
Wreck - not new.  I think it's just easier to read in bits and pieces.

Well, it does "slap you around" in bits and pieces!  Amazing, that this is what is out there and the ALE has "no clue"!!!!!!!!!

The KLPD knows, The F.B.I. knows........... just ask robots! :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:36:15 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.

Jug Twitty - On the Record w/ Greta
TWITTY: … Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

Art Wood - ‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’
WOOD: There’s a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there’s a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

Art Wood - Dana Petzer Show
WOOD: The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:38:47 PM

ART: On May 30, Paulus told Beth, Jug and friends (at least 5 people) that he picked up Joran at 4 am -
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4221.0


 As for Paulus, sources say he is the person next to Natalie in the casino.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198887,00.html

GRETA: I am also curious whether Paul van der Sloot used his phone between midnight and 7 a.m. on May 30
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161474,00.html

Thanks, Kermit--I thought I'd heard something about that. I think it behooves Joran to involve other people in what happened that night. I also think, given the maps I've seen on Joran's home in relation to the beach (and a personal experience in which I tried to walk from Palm/Eagle Beach back to the cruise ship dock) it would have taken Joran too long to walk home that night. Since Deepak was allegedly online...my money's on Paulus.

I think Mark Furhman also stated that there is no way a privileged Joran would walk home - that is what he had his slaves for.

And one of the news journalists walked it and said he could not have made it home by the hour he states he did.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 28, 2007, 11:39:06 PM
Wreck - not new.  I think it's just easier to read in bits and pieces.

Well, it does "slap you around" in bits and pieces!  Amazing, that this is what is out there and the ALE has "no clue"!!!!!!!!!

The KLPD knows, The F.B.I. knows........... just ask robots! :cool:



 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:39:21 PM
Does that mean there's a little Joran Jr. running around somewhere in the southern Caribbean?

LOL Joran said he doesn't have sex without a condom.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:43:10 PM
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/712/popeyeiq1.jpg)



ROFLMOA Kermit! Come to think of it we don't have pictures of them at the same at the same time bar in Aruba. Hmmmmm.


how old is this guy?  he looks 45 yrs. old.
dennisintn

Popeye is ageless!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:43:51 PM
Does that mean there's a little Joran Jr. running around somewhere in the southern Caribbean?

LOL Joran said he doesn't have sex without a condom.



Haha---really. Because the only reason Joran and Natalee didn't have sex was not, in fact, because Natalee would ever choose not to have sex with Joran, but because he didn't have a condom on him. (It's so typical coming from a sociopathic user of women).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 28, 2007, 11:44:33 PM
Quote from: BlueKYGirl on Today at 10:20:11 PM
Does that mean there's a little Joran Jr. running around somewhere in the southern Caribbean?

.......well, my guess is that getting an abortion on Aruba is as easy as going to McDonald's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:45:10 PM
Dayhiker,

I just don't think anyone was "pushing their button." I mean this is the Chief of Police and the Head Prosecutor! To think they were bullied is giving them a break and I just don't see it. They were the Dutch friends, I mean they worked with Paulus, were all Dutch and we are to believe they were bullied?

No way, they were part of this coverup. van der straaten could have taken all of them in on that first night and secured the property. Janssen and van der straaten simply would not have bought a lie for ten days if it was anyone else.

Look at the way they treated the guards. They are complicit, period.


Jannsen and Van der Straten certainly carried the Van der Sloots through until June 10th, but then the big boys took over to complete the cover-up. IMO, there had to be someone in ALE above Van der Straten that enabled the queered investigation to continue. Any honest Police Chief above him wouldn't have allowed it to happen, so somebody upstairs was allowing him to have his way. Or were they orchestrating it?

All Jannsen had to do is keep her lips shut under the auspices of Dutch law and make sure the judges didn't get anything that would implicate the suspects J2K2. Hence the decisions going the Van der Sloots way all the time. Throw in a whole nest of Paulus' Dutch Judiciary co-workers and Natalee didn't stand a chance at justice. The whole system is corrupt to hell and back.


BERNADINA


Goooooooooooooo FBI



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 28, 2007, 11:47:46 PM
Quote from: BlueKYGirl on Today at 10:20:11 PM
Does that mean there's a little Joran Jr. running around somewhere in the southern Caribbean?

.......well, my guess is that getting an abortion on Aruba is as easy as going to McDonald's

Yeah, you're probably right. If killing a U.S. citizen and getting away with it is within the realm of possibility, I guess a little bitty abortion doesn't seem like that big of a deal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:48:15 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.

I agree Klassend and so does Mark Furman:

Mark Furhman on Greta...... August 3, 2005

And I'm going to tell you, you know, Greta, I have a suspicion that the lie about dropping them off at the hotel and she fell and hit her head — that is because blunt force trauma was used on Natalee's head. And I hate to say this, but they're accounting for injuries, if the body is found, that will be able to be attributed to dropping her off at the hotel. This smacks of the suspect is in custody and they dropped the ball. They lost the momentum. The kid's smarter than the cops.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,164649,00.html


Guido was arrested on the charges of battery.
 which tells you Karen Jansen knew.






That explains those mysterious battery changes. I know we may never know why, but I can't help but wonder about a motive. Mistakes happen (I guess...) but why would they hurt her intentionally?

Rapists escalate their problems. It's like why does a person kill someone and eat them like Jeffery Dalmer. It escalates.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:49:15 PM
Does that mean there's a little Joran Jr. running around somewhere in the southern Caribbean?

LOL Joran said he doesn't have sex without a condom.



Haha---really. Because the only reason Joran and Natalee didn't have sex was not, in fact, because Natalee would ever choose not to have sex with Joran, but because he didn't have a condom on him. (It's so typical coming from a sociopathic user of women).

I agree with you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:50:41 PM
Wreck - not new.  I think it's just easier to read in bits and pieces.

Well, it does "slap you around" in bits and pieces!  Amazing, that this is what is out there and the ALE has "no clue"!!!!!!!!!

The KLPD knows, The F.B.I. knows........... just ask robots! :cool:



 :cool:

ROBOTS KNOWS EVERYTHING

gooooooo fbi



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 28, 2007, 11:51:23 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.

Jug Twitty - On the Record w/ Greta
TWITTY: … Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

Art Wood - ‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’
WOOD: There’s a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there’s a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

Art Wood - Dana Petzer Show
WOOD: The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there


These are exactly the reasons why I believe they will never close the case.  They don't want this information being released or other legal options pursued.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:51:59 PM
DUGGA

I hate the pop up ads.

There's no ads for flies!

Just thought you'd like to know.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:52:32 PM
Does anyone know for sure if legally, when the case is closed, information will be made available that is not visible now?

How do we know this is true in a post Arlene Schippers world?

In other words, what advantage is it to Aruba to keep the case open?

And lastly, could the U.S. be actually in favor of keeping this case open and the guilty un-prosecuted? Who silenced Spencer Bachus?

I looked at his declared political donations and couldn't find something.

Jug Twitty - On the Record w/ Greta
TWITTY: … Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

Art Wood - ‘Rita Cosby Live & Direct’
WOOD: There’s a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there’s a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

Art Wood - Dana Petzer Show
WOOD: The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there


These are exactly the reasons why I believe they will never close the case.  They don't want this information being released or other legal options pursued.


fbi are on to them

goooooooooooo fbi



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Helen Back on August 28, 2007, 11:57:15 PM
Dayhiker,

I just don't think anyone was "pushing their button." I mean this is the Chief of Police and the Head Prosecutor! To think they were bullied is giving them a break and I just don't see it. They were the Dutch friends, I mean they worked with Paulus, were all Dutch and we are to believe they were bullied?

No way, they were part of this coverup. van der straaten could have taken all of them in on that first night and secured the property. Janssen and van der straaten simply would not have bought a lie for ten days if it was anyone else.

Look at the way they treated the guards. They are complicit, period.


Jannsen and Van der Straten certainly carried the Van der Sloots through until June 10th, but then the big boys took over to complete the cover-up. IMO, there had to be someone in ALE above Van der Straten that enabled the queered investigation to continue. Any honest Police Chief above him wouldn't have allowed it to happen, so somebody upstairs was allowing him to have his way. Or were they orchestrating it?

All Jannsen had to do is keep her lips shut under the auspices of Dutch law and make sure the judges didn't get anything that would implicate the suspects J2K2. Hence the decisions going the Van der Sloots way all the time. Throw in a whole nest of Paulus' Dutch Judiciary co-workers and Natalee didn't stand a chance at justice. The whole system is corrupt to hell and back.


BERNADINA


Goooooooooooooo FBI



Did I hear somebody call my name?  I agree that Janssen and Van Der Straaten were complicit from the get-go and acted to protect Paulus.  And I believe that there is someone else involved that others jump for and protect.  I don't think the two situations are mutually exclusive.

Go FBI!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:57:53 PM
see ya later monkeys
ribbit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 28, 2007, 11:58:56 PM
Quote from: Helen Back

Did I hear somebody call my name? 
[/quote

Helen's name is FBI! Woo hoo.

ribbit.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 12:09:02 AM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 12:10:28 AM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.

Yep, I'm with you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 29, 2007, 12:11:47 AM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.


 :wink:actually, the cigars are on Angie! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 29, 2007, 12:12:42 AM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.

Yep, I'm with you!

Me, too--I've always had faith in the Dutch (and it's always nice to hear Robots' positive predictions).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 12:19:45 AM
Correction!  Cigars   :arrow: Angie911

H/T > wreck

btw, wreck > still laughing @ Boeti's bone soup.  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 29, 2007, 12:22:30 AM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.

Yep, I'm with you!

Me, too--I've always had faith in the Dutch (and it's always nice to hear Robots' positive predictions).
The only thing that keeps this case being prolonged is the fact that the Dutch are not going to stop with simply "solving the crime" (that has been done) -- the Dutch are wrapping up the corruption involved on a much larger scale. I still have a hunch that our FBI along with the Dutch have in fact relayed this to the family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Helen Back on August 29, 2007, 12:22:37 AM
Quote from: Helen Back

Did I hear somebody call my name? 
[/quote

Helen's name is FBI! Woo hoo.

ribbit.



hahahahahahahahahaha! 

Anyhoo, I have faith in the Dutch too.  Robots is right!  Good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 29, 2007, 12:25:32 AM
I hope so, wreck--I want justice for Natalee's family. They should know the truth even if the rest of us never find out.

Goodnight, monkeys!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 29, 2007, 06:36:32 AM
Good Morning!  Klaas, thanks for bringing Deepak's PV's over.  Interesting reading. Wonder why on 6/11 Deepak has to add that Joran was wearing the white tennis shoes and if they look in his house they won't find them.  On 6/10, Joran can't remember if he wore white tennis shoes or tan boots.  Deepak remembers what Joran wore and Joran doesn.'t. Odd. Sorry, I know a lot of you are all shoed out.
  Deepak's 6/9 he says "I drove home". Maybe he drove home with Satish, but I'm having a problem with him not driving himself to work, and Satish' timeline.  What happens when Satish is in school, how does Deepak get to work? Of course he drives himself. There's a reason Satish says he picks Deepak up from work. Any ideas?
  KLAAS, can you point me to Grande's spreadsheet of the witness statements.  TIA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 06:38:41 AM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
The Falling Down and hurting her head statement is all about covering-up for some kind of brutality, but what I find most interesting about this is they must have thought there was some chance Natalee might be found.

yep :cool:


Yes......but then she was moved so that she would NOT be found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 06:52:20 AM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.

yes, i agree totally

but i was just stating that it was all a lie

mixed in with some half baked truths  :wink:

Yes, same as other perps statements. I seem to remember reading one statement (not from Deepak) where the words 'she touched the pillar' were used and Deepak says 'she leaned against a pillar'.  Now, we know they all seem to spew 1/2 baked truths ... what's up w/ the pillar?? Why mention a pillar? Within the pimp crew, any homes have 'pillars'? It just seems odd to mention a 'pillar' when we know they were not back at the Holiday Inn because it was all a lie.  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 07:35:08 AM
Wreck - not new.  I think it's just easier to read in bits and pieces.

Well, it does "slap you around" in bits and pieces!  Amazing, that this is what is out there and the ALE has "no clue"!!!!!!!!!

The KLPD knows, The F.B.I. knows........... just ask robots! :cool:

Well I wish they would get back there and finish their job. VACATION IS OVER...wtf are they waiting for??? It has been as clear as the nose on all of our faces since they started spewing their crap in the PV's. This is beyond ridiculous. I am calling Nancy Grace to hold them IN CONTEMPT!!! ARGGGGGGGG!!!!!! :smt013 :smt075


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Leslie on August 29, 2007, 08:08:35 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 08:10:01 AM
That Zango pop up and the flashing ad crap to the right suck! DUGGaaaaaaaaaa, please make it go away. My pop up cop will take care of the tribal fusion garbage, but this Zango emotion thingy is driving me nuts. That flashing ad is bad for peeps w/ epilepsy also!! I don't have it, but I just may after reading here, arggggggg...sorry this is off topic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 29, 2007, 09:13:27 AM
That Zango pop up and the flashing ad crap to the right suck! DUGGaaaaaaaaaa, please make it go away. My pop up cop will take care of the tribal fusion garbage, but this Zango emotion thingy is driving me nuts. That flashing ad is bad for peeps w/ epilepsy also!! I don't have it, but I just may after reading here, arggggggg...sorry this is off topic.

Ads are what PAYS for this site. The onus is on us to use a browser that will block ads such as Maxthon or Firefox if they "annoy" you.  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 29, 2007, 09:46:36 AM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement;

To your question as to where the story with the security guard came into the picture, I can say the following. I had made-up that part of the story.
To your question whether I had thought about telling the truth that night, I can say the following. I had not told the truth because in the first place Joran had asked me not to, he is my friend and I was afraid of the police because I thought that I would get into trouble with the police.

To your question as to how Joran was on the day that we went to “Carlos & Charlies”, I can say the following. He was sociable, not aggressive. In one word sociable. I do not know how much he had drank.
To your question how Natalee was that night in “Carlos & Charlies”, I can say the following. She danced beautifully, I had lied in my previous statement about her being unsteady on her feet when she stepped off the podium/stage. That was beside the truth. She had a steady walk. According to my opinion she was reasonably with it.


Thanks for posting Deepak's June 11 statement Klaas. Going back and reading it I realized he made many adjustments to his previous story. The parts where he recants that Natalee was not drunk, dropping Joran off at his house, etc.. It would be beneficial to compare his changes to those Joran and Satish made to theirs.

It is obvious the police were allowing them to share information duing this period, a definite taboo to good investigative technique. One more reason to suspect a highly corrupt ALE and prosecutor.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 10:50:29 AM
From Satish's June 10th Statement:

How late did you arrive in Carlos & Charlies on Sunday May 29th 2005?

We had arrived at approximately 23.30 in Carlos & Charlies on that Sunday.

How did you meet/get to know the girl in Carlos & Charlies?

I have nothing more to state about that day.

Did Joran introduce the girl to you?

I don't know.

What did you (remark by the translator, you is mean plural here) when you were there?

I have no statement to make.

Till what time did you stay in Carlos & Charlies?

I have no statement to make.

Did the girl drink in Carlos & Charlies?

I have no statement to make.

What route did you take to the "Light House"? The Sasaki road or the road passing in front of Eagle Beach?

I have no statement to make.

How fast was your brother driving when he was driving towards the "Light House"?

I have no statement to make.

Are you 100% sure, that you dropped off the girl at the Holiday Inn?

I have no statement to make.

Why did you not help to try and find the girl after you had heard that she had gone missing?

I have nothing more to state.

At what time did you come home the night in question?

I have no statement to make.

When you had arrived home, what did you (remark by translator, plural) do?

I have no statement to make.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=190.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 10:53:09 AM
From Satish's June 11th Statement:

The statements I gave before were not entirely based on the truth.

I am now willing to make a statement in accordance with the truth.


On Sunday May 29th 2005, at approximately 21.45 hours I went to pick up my brother Deepak where he works. I went to pick up Deepak in Deepak's car. Deepak has a grey coloured car of the make Honda Civic. When I arrived at his place of work I waited for him. At approximately 22.10 Deepak got into the car. We drove from the Seaport Market Place to Taco Bell in Santa Cruz to buy something to eat. After we had bought something to eat at Taco Bell we drove home to eat. When we were sitting at home eating, my brother Deepak said to me that Joran had asked him if he could go to Carlos & Charlies. My brother told me that Joran had told him that he had on that day in the hours of the afternoon met a few girls in the casino, My brother did not tell me in which casino Joran had met these girls. I decided to go with my brother and Joran to Carlos & Charlies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 10:57:18 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

The father of Joran at that moment was sleeping inside the house. The mother of Joran was during that period still in the Netherlands. Joran said that his father did not know that he would be going out. On the way to Carlos and Charlies Joran told us that during that day in the afternoon hours he had met a few girls in the casino. Joran told us that he had helped a girl win back some of her father's money that she had lost. Joran had told us that she had lost three hundred something dollars of her father's money in the casino and that he had helped the girl win back a little over 100 dollars. Joran said that after the girl had won more than 100 dollars, he had told her that she should stop gambling. Joran said the girl had invited him to come to Carlos & Charlies. Joran did not mention the name of the girl.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 29, 2007, 10:59:19 AM
From Satish's June 11th Statement:

The statements I gave before were not entirely based on the truth.

I am now willing to make a statement in accordance with the truth.


On Sunday May 29th 2005, at approximately 21.45 hours I went to pick up my brother Deepak where he works. I went to pick up Deepak in Deepak's car. Deepak has a grey coloured car of the make Honda Civic. When I arrived at his place of work I waited for him. At approximately 22.10 Deepak got into the car. We drove from the Seaport Market Place to Taco Bell in Santa Cruz to buy something to eat. After we had bought something to eat at Taco Bell we drove home to eat. When we were sitting at home eating, my brother Deepak said to me that Joran had asked him if he could go to Carlos & Charlies. My brother told me that Joran had told him that he had on that day in the hours of the afternoon met a few girls in the casino, My brother did not tell me in which casino Joran had met these girls. I decided to go with my brother and Joran to Carlos & Charlies.

This is similar to what Jaime has said about a phone call from Joran.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: jackb on August 29, 2007, 11:00:37 AM
More from Deepak's June 11th Statement:

To your question as to how I think about Joran making statements against me and my brother, I can say the following. I think he that he did this to blame the whole thing on us.

To your question as to what I think happened to the girl or what Joran did to her, I can say the following, I think that he raped her and is afraid to state that. I don't think he murdered her.

To your question as to why I think he has raped her, I can say the following. I think that because he doesn't want to tell the truth. That is the only reason I can think of.

To your question whether Joran could have been involved with a rape some time before, I can say the following. I do not know. My brother told me once that a girl had said that she had been impregnated by Joran. I do not know what happened after that.

To your question whether the statement I have just made is entirely in accordance with the truth, I can say the following. My statement is in accordance with the truth. I swear to you that this is the truth.


I believe at least one of the shoes is in the "bag picture" with her head resting on it.
jack/b


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:03:20 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother Deepak parked the car behind the former Ritsz building. After my brother had parked the car, the three of us walked to Carlos & Charlies. I saw that on the right side, when you walk into Carlos & Charlies, a group of Americans. I knew that they were Americans because they were talking in English. This group consisted of approximately 60 to 70 people. We kept on walking and stood and watched near the podium. On the podium was a girl. When the girl saw us, she made it clear with hand gestures that she wanted Joran to come and dance with her. I saw that Joran made it clear with a hand gesture that he would not go and dance with her. We started walking again until we got to the bar. Joran had bought three Yard Whisky coke for us. After that we returned to the podium to stand and watch. While we were standing there watching the girl, who had wanted Joran to come and dance with her, came over to Joran. Joran and the girl started talking. I saw that my brother was talking to a boy. The boy with whom my brother was talking I know by face only, I do not know his name. I had seen him in Carlos & Charlies before. I saw that the girl took Joran by the hand and lead him to another bar. I followed them. My brother stayed behind because he was talking to this boy. I saw that the girl laid down on top of the bar. I had never seen this before. (BS you go to CnC regularly and you've never seen this before?)I asked Joran "What is she going to do." Joran told me that the girl wanted him to drink a bodyshot off of her. I saw that the girl poured a drink on her belly, after which Joran drank it (sucked it up). The girl had paid for the bodyshot (drink). According to me I had stood alone for a while. Joran came over to me with the girl and told me that the bar had closed. It started to get busier at Carlos & Charlies. I assumed that this had to do with the fact that the activity called "Soul Beach" had just ended.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:06:05 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

We, Joran, the girl and myself, had walked over to another bar where we had earlier bought the Yard's.

I had not seen my brother anymore. I saw that Joran and the girl were about to drink a shot. At that point I received a "missed call". I did not hear the phone but felt that I was being called, this was because I had set my mobile phone to vibrate.

I saw that my brother had called me. I know that my brother didn't have any more credit on his mobile phone and had called him back. My brother answered his phone and asked where we were. I told him that we were still inside Carlos & Charlies. He had told me that he was already at his car. I told him that we would come to where he was. I said to Joran that my brother was already at the car and if we were leaving, because Carlos & Charlies was about to close. Joran said that it was OK that we would be leaving and that the girl would be coming with us. We, Joran, the girl and myself, then walked outside

Remember Deepak said Satish came out to the car by himself first, gave Deepak the keys, then went back inside and got Joran and Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:12:24 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother then drove on. We then drove by way of the city center towards the boulevard near where the Sonesta Hotel is. When we got close to the Sonesta Hotel he turned right and drove towards the hotels. When we got to the intersection west of Royal Plaza, we saw that the people where no longer standing at the intersection. We drove on in a westerly direction. We were driving on the boulevard where the gas station is when the girl said she wanted to go see the sharks in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Joran told the girl that there were no shark in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Then the girl said that the "lighthouse" was the only place on Aruba that she had not yet seen. The girl said that she wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then told my brother to drive to the "lighthouse" if the girl wanted to go and see the "lighthouse". My brother then drove towards the "lighthouse". While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler" (BS).  I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation (more BS).  Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 29, 2007, 11:14:28 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

We, Joran, the girl and myself, had walked over to another bar where we had earlier bought the Yard's.

I had not seen my brother anymore. I saw that Joran and the girl were about to drink a shot. At that point I received a "missed call". I did not hear the phone but felt that I was being called, this was because I had set my mobile phone to vibrate.

I saw that my brother had called me. I know that my brother didn't have any more credit on his mobile phone and had called him back. My brother answered his phone and asked where we were. I told him that we were still inside Carlos & Charlies. He had told me that he was already at his car. I told him that we would come to where he was. I said to Joran that my brother was already at the car and if we were leaving, because Carlos & Charlies was about to close. Joran said that it was OK that we would be leaving and that the girl would be coming with us. We, Joran, the girl and myself, then walked outside

Remember Deepak said Satish came out to the car by himself first, gave Deepak the keys, then went back inside and got Joran and Natalee.

This is what I was asking about yesterday.  This seems important to me but I don't know why.  Deepak and Satish have different stories here.  Seems like one of them may not have actually been there or one of them is lying.  Why tell this particular lie?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:17:01 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother continued to drive into the direction of the "lighthouse". When we had passed the traffic lights at Wendy's, I saw that Joran and the girl were kissing. Whilst my brother was driving in a northerly direction, I saw a car pull up aside of us and procede left in the direction of the Holiday Inn Hotel. We were still driving in a northerly direction. My brother kept on driving till we reached the "lighthouse". When we had arrived at the "lighthouse" my brother asked Joran if the girl wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then said that he didn't think she would want to see it because she had fallen asleep. At that moment I turned around and saw that the girl was lying on Joran's lap and that she was sleeping. Joran had awakened the girl. Joran then told my brother that he didn't think that the girl would want to see the "lighthouse".   The girl had been awake then. Joran then asked the girl if she was staying in the Holiday Inn hotel. The girl answered that she was staying at the Holiday Inn hotel. Joran then said to my brother that he should drive to the Holiday Inn hotel to drop off the girl. My brother then drove in the direction of the Holiday Inn hotel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 11:17:31 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother Deepak parked the car behind the former Ritsz building. After my brother had parked the car, the three of us walked to Carlos & Charlies. I saw that on the right side, when you walk into Carlos & Charlies, a group of Americans. I knew that they were Americans because they were talking in English. This group consisted of approximately 60 to 70 people. We kept on walking and stood and watched near the podium. On the podium was a girl. When the girl saw us, she made it clear with hand gestures that she wanted Joran to come and dance with her. I saw that Joran made it clear with a hand gesture that he would not go and dance with her. We started walking again until we got to the bar. Joran had bought three Yard Whisky coke for us. After that we returned to the podium to stand and watch. While we were standing there watching the girl, who had wanted Joran to come and dance with her, came over to Joran. Joran and the girl started talking. I saw that my brother was talking to a boy. The boy with whom my brother was talking I know by face only, I do not know his name. I had seen him in Carlos & Charlies before. I saw that the girl took Joran by the hand and lead him to another bar. I followed them. My brother stayed behind because he was talking to this boy. I saw that the girl laid down on top of the bar. I had never seen this before. (BS you go to CnC regularly and you've never seen this before?)I asked Joran "What is she going to do." Joran told me that the girl wanted him to drink a bodyshot off of her. I saw that the girl poured a drink on her belly, after which Joran drank it (sucked it up). The girl had paid for the bodyshot (drink). According to me I had stood alone for a while. Joran came over to me with the girl and told me that the bar had closed. It started to get busier at Carlos & Charlies. I assumed that this had to do with the fact that the activity called "Soul Beach" had just ended.

Was this ever confirmed about Joran drinking a body shot off Natalee.  Or is it just him saying this.  I remember the first time we heard anything about a body shot it was from the Kalpoes lawyer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 29, 2007, 11:19:17 AM
There were a few comments on previous pages about abortion on Aruba. Abortion is illegal there. It is not illegal in The Netherlands. Occasional discussions on Aruba about changing this, at least in some cases, meet great resistance.

(For what it's worth - abortion probably is illegal in most Central and South American countries and throughout the Caribbean. I don't know that for a fact.)
 
Similarly - "gay marriage" has recently been an issue on Aruba. A couple that had a civil union in The Netherlands moved (or tried to move) to Aruba. The Netherlands insisted that the union must be recognized, but Aruba insisted not. I did not follow this closely so I'm not sure of the outcome. IIRC, they were females.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:22:42 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

After we got home I immediately went to sleep. My brother had gone into his room. I do not know if he immediately went to sleep. On May 30th 2005 I had awoken between 11.00 hours and 12.00 hours. When I woke up I asked my brother if he knew how Joran had made it to his house. My brother told me that he had been called during the night hours by Joran. My brother told me that when he was talking to Joran, he could hear that Joran was breathing heavily. My brother told me that had asked Joran what he was doing at the time. Joran had told my brother that he was at that time walking home towards his house. My brother told me that he had asked Joran about the girl and that Joran had told him that he had left the girl at the beach. According to my brother Joran had told him that he had taken off his shoes and that he and the girl had gone into the water. Joran had then told my brother that after that he and the girl had gotten out of the water and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach. Joran told my brother that he had then tried to wake up the girl but that she had not awakened. Joran told my brother that he had looked to find his shoes but that he couldn't find them. Joran told my brother that he had left the girl on the beach and that he had walked home barefoot.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 11:22:58 AM
More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother then drove on. We then drove by way of the city center towards the boulevard near where the Sonesta Hotel is. When we got close to the Sonesta Hotel he turned right and drove towards the hotels. When we got to the intersection west of Royal Plaza, we saw that the people where no longer standing at the intersection. We drove on in a westerly direction. We were driving on the boulevard where the gas station is when the girl said she wanted to go see the sharks in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Joran told the girl that there were no shark in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Then the girl said that the "lighthouse" was the only place on Aruba that she had not yet seen. The girl said that she wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then told my brother to drive to the "lighthouse" if the girl wanted to go and see the "lighthouse". My brother then drove towards the "lighthouse". While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler" (BS).  I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation (more BS).  Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.

BS is right.

So when they first took Natalee they had the radio so loud that no one could hear her screaming.  Then when they felt it was safe (VDS Home) they lowered the radio so they would not bring attention to what was going on in the car.  This is where I believe Joran's neighbor came out and told him to lower the radio.   This all happened at the Paul Van der Sloot's home and no where else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 29, 2007, 11:23:44 AM
Stand Up for Natalee:
Travel/Tourism Trade Shows Coming Up!


Atlantic City - October 30, 31

King of Prussia PA - November 17, 18

Ft lauderdale - November 17, 18

Luxury Travel Show in Vegas - December 4 - 6.

Tourism/Travel Show thread, current Page 9:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.160 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.160)
(It would be good to read the entire thread if you are interested in participating. There are tips, reports, photos, etc.)

Email this address if you're interested, or to learn where to send donation for brochures, buttons, signs, etc.:
JusticeforNatalee@gmail.com

Notes re. these two shows, previously listed:

Chicago - Sept. 25 - 27 - No Natalee demo. The show is in the middle of the week, which probably involves too much time away from work or home for most Monkeys.

Minnesota - Oct. 27, 28 - Show was cancelled due to bridge collapse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 11:25:50 AM
Bon Dia / Arubagirl article @ RU

Decision to prosecute or not will be made in November.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 29, 2007, 11:27:56 AM
Bon Dia / Arubagirl article @ RU

Decision to prosecute or not will be made in November.

Before or after TES completes their search is my question.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 11:28:17 AM
& KLPD status/duties uncertain.

& more whining about the media.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 29, 2007, 11:29:35 AM
I posted quickly yesterday, mentioning Satish taking the Aruban 5th, and Klaas has just put the PV I was thinking of in view.  I'm wondering what made Satish change his stance after 2 statements on the 10th, where he would not answer all questions & wanted his lawyer's approval, and then on the 11th insist on telling the 'truth', which doesn't match Deepak's version. 

I'm also thinking that the 10th - 11th was the period of time the announcement was made that someone confessed, followed by a retraction and then the 'something bad happened' report.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:36:49 AM
Thanks Igsigs!

Bondia 8/29/07 - translated by Arubagirl and posted at RU by Sunmoonstars:

Article Bon Dia Aruba...Arubagirl translation

It still hasn't been decided if the Dutch team has to return to Aruba
In November The Justice Department Will Take a Decision on the Nataly [sic] Holloway Case

Oranjestad. The developments in the investigations of the disappearance case of Nataly [sic] Holloway case have changed. This is what Bon Dia Aruba could conclude after an interview with the spokeswoman for the Justice Department mr. [lawyer --ag] Vivian van der Biezen.

Previously Bon Dia Aruba had published that the Dutch investigative team returned to the Netherlands because of the vacation season and that the intention was to return next month to continue the investigations together with the Aruban team. After the Dutch team returned to the Netherlands, the Aruban team continued the necessary investigations.

Bon Dia Aruba understood from the Justice Department that the decision has been made to evaluate all the information produced by the investigations. This will take the necessary time and during the evaluation of the information it will be seen if assistance from the Netherlands is still necessary. If this is necessary they will be called to return but if this is not necessary, than the Justice Department will conclude from the gathered information what is going to happen with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case.

The Justice Department stipulated that in November 2007 a decision will be made with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case. The Justice Department will choose to commence a criminal case against the three suspects who are Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe, or the Justice Department will decide that there is not sufficient evidence to start a criminal case and will let the case go.

It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.
---
Bon Dia Aruba, Page A3, Wednesday August 29, 2007


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 11:39:36 AM
Per the Prosecuter's office the decision to charge or not is specific to >

Joran van der Sloot

Deepak Kalpoe

Satish Kalpoe


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 29, 2007, 11:43:47 AM
On 5/31 Satish has his story which is different than Deepak's. Their timeframes and what happens at C&C's are totally off.  On 6/9 instead of changing his to match Deepaks' he takes the 5th, and yes 2NJSons_Mom, does the same again on the 10th.  Why didn't he change and go along with Deepak on the 9th.  Something happened on 6/10 or early 6/11.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 11:45:39 AM
It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.
---  

Note to Bon Dia: A functioning justice system can only improve the image of your island. Comprende?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: jackb on August 29, 2007, 11:47:41 AM
(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/712/popeyeiq1.jpg)


It is interesting to me that this man looks and has the overall aura of Charles Manson in some of his pictures where he is without the beard and long hair.  Manson was about 35 (or there about) when he had his crew go on a rampage and perform murders under the influence of drugs.  Certain personalities seem to flock to those with evil personalities, as it must justify their own existence.         blue/j


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 12:08:05 PM
gonna get em all  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 29, 2007, 12:08:44 PM
On 5/31 Satish has his story which is different than Deepak's. Their timeframes and what happens at C&C's are totally off.  On 6/9 instead of changing his to match Deepaks' he takes the 5th, and yes 2NJSons_Mom, does the same again on the 10th.  Why didn't he change and go along with Deepak on the 9th.  Something happened on 6/10 or early 6/11.

This is exactly what I have been thinking but cannot imagine what happened or come up with a theory.....it would make more sense if the Kalpoes statements matched....'how is the girl' still makes me wonder......the security guards were released on the 13th but I'm not sure that would be a factor....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 12:14:13 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 12:26:57 PM
Thanks Igsigs!

Bondia 8/29/07 - translated by Arubagirl and posted at RU by Sunmoonstars:

Article Bon Dia Aruba...Arubagirl translation

It still hasn't been decided if the Dutch team has to return to Aruba
In November The Justice Department Will Take a Decision on the Nataly [sic] Holloway Case

Oranjestad. The developments in the investigations of the disappearance case of Nataly [sic] Holloway case have changed. This is what Bon Dia Aruba could conclude after an interview with the spokeswoman for the Justice Department mr. [lawyer --ag] Vivian van der Biezen.

Previously Bon Dia Aruba had published that the Dutch investigative team returned to the Netherlands because of the vacation season and that the intention was to return next month to continue the investigations together with the Aruban team. After the Dutch team returned to the Netherlands, the Aruban team continued the necessary investigations.

Bon Dia Aruba understood from the Justice Department that the decision has been made to evaluate all the information produced by the investigations. This will take the necessary time and during the evaluation of the information it will be seen if assistance from the Netherlands is still necessary. If this is necessary they will be called to return but if this is not necessary, than the Justice Department will conclude from the gathered information what is going to happen with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case.

The Justice Department stipulated that in November 2007 a decision will be made with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case. The Justice Department will choose to commence a criminal case against the three suspects who are Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe, or the Justice Department will decide that there is not sufficient evidence to start a criminal case and will let the case go.

It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit  and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.
---
Bon Dia Aruba, Page A3, Wednesday August 29, 2007

Bunch of jackasses.  Like we had control over their actions.  They saw fit not to do a proper investigation.  It was our media who exposed them. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 12:33:30 PM
On 5/31 Satish has his story which is different than Deepak's. Their timeframes and what happens at C&C's are totally off.  On 6/9 instead of changing his to match Deepaks' he takes the 5th, and yes 2NJSons_Mom, does the same again on the 10th.  Why didn't he change and go along with Deepak on the 9th.  Something happened on 6/10 or early 6/11.

Yeah Deepak confessed.  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 12:38:01 PM
more boats...pg 10+11...didn't Koen take his boat out that night? Joran declined...correct?http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 12:39:34 PM
more boats...pg 10+11...didn't Koen take his boat out that night? Joran declined...correct?http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

I think Sander said earlier in the day on May 29th.  I'll look at Sander's statements.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 12:44:08 PM
more boats...pg 10+11...didn't Koen take his boat out that night? Joran declined...correct?http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

I think Sander said earlier in the day on May 29th.  I'll look at Sander's statements.

Sander's June 17th Statement:

On your question if I had contact with Joran on May 29, 2005, I tell you the following;
I had telephone contact with Joran on May 29, 2005, this was around 11.00.

On your question about how the conversation went, I will tell you the following;
The conversation went that I asked him if he wanted to go out on my fathers boat.

He said that he could not go because he was going to play poker at the Holiday Inn. There is tournament each Sunday in aforementioned hotel and Joran participates almost each week in that tournament.

On your question what kind of boat my father has, I will explain to you the following:
 It is a speedboat, of the make "Sea Pro".

On your question if Joran had been on our boat before, I will explain to you the following:
Joran has never been on our boat and has also never with our dangers. (?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 12:45:50 PM
more boats...pg 10+11...didn't Koen take his boat out that night? Joran declined...correct?http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

I think Sander said earlier in the day on May 29th.  I'll look at Sander's statements.


Yes....that sound right...thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 29, 2007, 12:54:43 PM
On 5/31 Satish has his story which is different than Deepak's. Their timeframes and what happens at C&C's are totally off.  On 6/9 instead of changing his to match Deepaks' he takes the 5th, and yes 2NJSons_Mom, does the same again on the 10th.  Why didn't he change and go along with Deepak on the 9th.  Something happened on 6/10 or early 6/11.

Yeah Deepak confessed.  JMO.

San ... I am inclined to believe that it was Deepak who broke down and confessed to what happened to Natalee Holloway.

Nevertheless ... according to the following quote ... the head of the Natalee Holloway investigation ... Gerold Dompig ... acknowledged that "somebody" confession but ... would not identify that person.

This Natalee Holloway case was solved on June 10, 2005!!

Janet



Gerold Dompig
Associated Press
June 12, 2005


Deputy Police Commissioner, Gerold Dompig, told The Associated Press that one of three young men arrested in the case admitted "something bad Happened" to Holloway and was leading police to the scene. Prosecutors refused to comment on Dompig's statement, and Dompig himself refused to identify which of the three young men who took Holloway to the Northern beach the night she went missing made the statement.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 29, 2007, 12:56:32 PM
San, Why is Satish refusing to answer certain questions and wanting his lawyer on the 9th and 10 th?  Didn't he know all the correct answers?  They had plenty of time to get their lies straight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 29, 2007, 01:00:14 PM
more boats...pg 10+11...didn't Koen take his boat out that night? Joran declined...correct?http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

I think Sander said earlier in the day on May 29th.  I'll look at Sander's statements.


Yes....that sound right...thanks.


SANDER GOTTENBOS
Witness Statement
June 17, 2005


On your question if I had contact with Joran on May 29, 2005, I tell you the following;
 
I had telephone contact with Joran on May 29, 2005, this was around 11.00.

On your question about how the conversation went, I will tell you the following;
 
The conversation went that I asked him if he wanted to go out on my fathers boat.

He said that he could not go because he was going to play poker at the Holiday Inn. There is tournament each Sunday in aforementioned hotel and Joran participates almost each week in that tournament.

On your question what kind of boat my father has, I will explain to you the following:
It is a speedboat, of the make "Sea Pro".

On your question if Joran had been on our boat before, I will explain to you the following:
Joran has never been on our boat and has also never with our dangers. (?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 01:00:26 PM
San, Why is Satish refusing to answer certain questions and wanting his lawyer on the 9th and 10 th?  Didn't he know all the correct answers?  They had plenty of time to get their lies straight.

I think Satish knew something was about to happen and didn't know what it was yet.  So if he didn't know his best bet would be to shut up until he finds out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 01:05:06 PM
They way the Van der Sloots had their inside man in Van der Straaten so did the Kalpoes with Dompig.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 29, 2007, 01:10:29 PM
San, Why is Satish refusing to answer certain questions and wanting his lawyer on the 9th and 10 th?  Didn't he know all the correct answers?  They had plenty of time to get their lies straight.

I am not San but ...

I suspect that Satish was aware that there had been an admission by either Deepak or Joran and ... realized that by answering the questions according to the story that had been collaborated ... fabricated ... he  would be exposed for what he was ... a dispicable human who was  intentionally putting an anquish family through a H--- on Earth by covering up the truth regarding what happened to their precious Natalee.

Janet   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 29, 2007, 01:15:45 PM
San ... I apologize for responding to a question directed to you from MumInOhio.  I thought you had left the forum.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 01:17:23 PM
San ... I apologize for responding to a question directed to you from MumInOhio.  I thought you had left the forum.

Janet

Janet, never apologize for answering a question.  That's what we are all here for.  Thanks for answering it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Pita on August 29, 2007, 01:18:16 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

Here's another picture...

(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/19-05-05winefood/132.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: flyer33716 on August 29, 2007, 01:36:46 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

Here's another picture...

(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/19-05-05winefood/132.jpg)

Man is that broad ugly!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 01:49:00 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

Here's another picture...

(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/19-05-05winefood/132.jpg)

Man is that broad ugly!!!!

I agree :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 29, 2007, 01:50:12 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

A paid escort most likely.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 29, 2007, 01:57:44 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

Here's another picture...

(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/19-05-05winefood/132.jpg)

Man is that broad ugly!!!!

I agree :lol:

Me three!! And I actually feel sorry for that guy. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 29, 2007, 02:03:39 PM


boy, that julia is a gutsy thing.  after telling us all for 2 yrs. that natalee vanished because she was partying, dancing, having fun, laughing, doesn't she realize how much danger she's in by doing the same things?  or could there be some factors that she left out of the warnings?
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 29, 2007, 02:11:13 PM
SOUL BEACH 2005
(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/22.jpg)

Patrick Boset and Julia Renfro
(http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/prev/21.jpg)



(http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/7581/image97jj2.jpg)

JULIE RENFRO AND PATRICK BOSET NONEED2BOYCOTTARUBA.COM
With assistance (and math help) from: Julia Renfro, Editor in Chief, Aruba Today;
http://noneed2boycottaruba.com/?p=1


(http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/701/image98lx4.jpg)
JULIA RENFRO AND PATRICK BOSET AT THE ARUBA WINE FOOD & ART FESTIVAL Wyndham Hotel May 19-22 2005



IFA MEMBERS LIST:
http://www.ifaruba.com/marchnews.pdf (I think the IFA removed the link to the information now. I had posted it on BFN & it was working then).

(http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/3239/image99es8.jpg)
PATRICK BOSET on left

(http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/6281/image101xx3.jpg)
PATRICK BOSET ON LEFT


IFA MEMBERS
Happy Birthday!
12/1 Juggie Daryanani
12/7 Tati Elwood
12/9 Milagro Gil-Sanchez
12/18 Randall Beaujon
12/20 Mike Shepard
12/21 Tina Escobedo
12/22 Mashelle Zeolla
12/23 Jim MacPherson
12/28 Patrick Boset
12/29 Monica Daryanani
12/31 Elaine Bates

Boset, Patrick",delta@setarnet.aw
Diamonds International Aruba","L.G. Smith Blvd. #17","Oranjestad, - AW","011 297 880443","
http://www.0-0.com/txt_s/cn_aruba.htm


BOSET PATRICK JOHN NUNE 84
http://www.arubachamber.com/DISKKLEINBEDRIJF31JULI2004.htm


(http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/6573/image102cv6.jpg)
atrick Boset has been involved with La Cage Folie restaurant since December. The famous main street retailer, he owns Mango, became a restaurateur by default. When "The 3 Little Birds" folded, Chef Marc Vullinghs has naturally become unemployed. Patrick couldn't see his favorite cook out of the kitchen and reopened the restaurant, with the chef as his partner. The third leg of this interesting combo is Michael v/d Berg, perhaps Aruba's top wine expert. Michael is responsible for an amazing wine list, we counted six pages, with exquisite varieties from around the globe. Marc and very cute wife Angela now rule the rooftop veranda restaurant at the heart of town. http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/newsdesk/backissues/newsletter59.html
Cage Folie (3 birds) was OK. We were the only people (at beginning) and according to their guestbook business was low. Entrees were bad (pasta and Red Snapper/Grouper). Pasta had sand in it (or crushed shells or something). Setting is nice (now white sand on the floor) and therefor the second runner up just above M.J. http://www.visitaruba.com/guestarea/tripreports/trip397.html


La Cage Folie
Address: Caya G.F. Betico Croes 9 (Aquarius Mal)
Phone: (297) 583-4222
Patrick Boset owns Mangos Restaurant which is located at the Amsterdam Hotel & Resort
http://www.amsterdammanor.com/en/amenities_restaurants.html



INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF ARUBA ORGANIZED THE FIRST SEARCH TEAMS - knowing what you know of Julia Renfro disguising herself on many websites and posting lies about the case - one has to wonder why she was invovled. Was she being paid?

Some of our friends are members of “Friends of Aruba” and were closely involved with the search of the girl.
Source:Paulus VDS Witness Statement 06/18/05



In those tumultuous first days, Beth's most valuable allies were Julia Renfro, the 37-year-old American-born editor of an English-language daily, Aruba Today, and one of her reporters, Angela Munzenhofer,

<snip>
We were with them day and night

<snip>
Renfro and Munzenhofer met in the Holiday Inn's lobby to organize the first search teams.
(source: Vanity Fair)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: flyer33716 on August 29, 2007, 02:16:48 PM


boy, that julia is a gutsy thing.  after telling us all for 2 yrs. that natalee vanished because she was partying, dancing, having fun, laughing, doesn't she realize how much danger she's in by doing the same things?  or could there be some factors that she left out of the warnings?
dennisintn
I do not think she needs to worry. The pimps prefer "pretty" young ladies


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 29, 2007, 03:02:31 PM
Hi Kermit

IMO, the last picture you posted of PATRICK BOSET (with the 3 girls) is not the guy in the picture with Renfro.

But it is the same guy in the striped shirt in the picture of the 4 guys.


So which one is Patrick Boset? The one with Renfro? Or the one with the 3 girls?

Or is it time for new eyeglass prescription :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 29, 2007, 04:18:10 PM
Posted by Victor (on scrux) regarding the BonDia article (translated by arubagirl) posted earlier.

Maybe it is interesting to add that the OM when asked, after the latest intensive investigation one would expect it would be more then clear to them whether they have something or they don't, the answer was, having something(s) that stand out, things that would be considered to be more then clear by ppl in general does not mean it therefor also being easy to tie it to a person juridically.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Katysmom on August 29, 2007, 05:17:00 PM
Hello Monkeys!  I've been away for a while and am trying to catch up.  Could someone explain to me why the search trip TES was planning has been delayed until November?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 05:20:55 PM
Hello Monkeys!  I've been away for a while and am trying to catch up.  Could someone explain to me why the search trip TES was planning has been delayed until November?

Not sure exactly, the information came from BFN.  I think because of the hurricane season and maybe a couple other things.  I really don't remember.

Come over to the Musing thread, I want to hear how you are doing?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2071.new#new


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Pita on August 29, 2007, 05:26:18 PM
ABC TODAY  
 
Business address SALINA CERCA 39-H, NOORD 
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Name of the company  MEDIAMAX ARUBA N.V. 
Statutory seat  ARUBA 
Date of incorporation  14 MAY 2002 
     
Main branch: MEDIAMAX ARUBA N.V. registered under number 28973
located at CAYA G.F. (BETICO) CROES 9, ORANJESTAD OOST 
NOT IN POSSESION OF A BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LICENCE 
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
BOSET, PATRICK JOHN
Residing in  PARADERA 35, PARADERA, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, GOIRLE on 28 DECEMBER 1967 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  14 MAY 2002 
Authority  FULL 
   
RENFRO, JULIA CHRISTINE
Residing in  SALINA CERCA 39-H, NOORD, ARUBA 
Born in  U.S.A., CALIFORNIE on 30 AUGUST 1966 
Nationality  AMERICAN 
Position  PROXY A W/T "ASST. MANAGER" 
Effective  27 JUNE 2007 
Authority  FULL 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 29, 2007, 05:34:01 PM
snipped:

It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.

Ohhhh.........HEADS UP, MONKEYS!  :2doh: :smt093

They already know what they're going to do. That's why they're beginning to "brace" themselves. Even Aruba must know that bringing this case to be tried would have a very different impact than just saying, "Woops, lost her, but we can't do anything about it. And by the way, Come To Our Happy Island!."

I'm SO glad that Beth's book will be out by November. I hope it rocks their little world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 05:36:31 PM
Posted by Victor (on scrux) regarding the BonDia article (translated by arubagirl) posted earlier.

Maybe it is interesting to add that the OM when asked, after the latest intensive investigation one would expect it would be more then clear to them whether they have something or they don't, the answer was, having something(s) that stand out, things that would be considered to be more then clear by ppl in general does not mean it therefor also being easy to tie it to a person juridically.

Basically they will say they know she died of an OD but we can't pin it on anyone.  Such BS.  How did they come to their conclusions.  Based on a bunch of liars statements.  Based on a pervert father and his psycho sons.  Based on two brothers who are a waste of life.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 29, 2007, 06:03:19 PM
Why all the negative energy? (Oh yeah, this is Aruba) But I have to say I would be surprised if the KLPD does nothing.

Sometimes people's worst qualities, in this case the Dutch, can be their best qualities.

The KLPD will not be manipulated and it's not only in their nature to be cold, but also somewhat precise. I'm pretty sure they know what happened here and will not care about Aruba's impact on tourism.

As one poster said, they have to prosecute, not because of any pressure or politics, but because they have the picture of what happened here.

There is no good option for Aruba and at this point, what more can Oduber and Croes do to be less cooperative?

Who's going to explain how she od'd and disappeared herself?

Is there any truth to the rumor that the Miss Teen who did her Arlene Schippers impression will be hired as the new spokesperson to explain the hybrid Dutch law?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 29, 2007, 06:14:05 PM
Posted by Victor (on scrux) regarding the BonDia article (translated by arubagirl) posted earlier.

Maybe it is interesting to add that the OM when asked, after the latest intensive investigation one would expect it would be more then clear to them whether they have something or they don't, the answer was, having something(s) that stand out, things that would be considered to be more then clear by ppl in general does not mean it therefor also being easy to tie it to a person juridically.

Basically they will say they know she died of an OD but we can't pin it on anyone.  Such BS.  How did they come to their conclusions.  Based on a bunch of liars statements.  Based on a pervert father and his psycho sons.  Based on two brothers who are a waste of life.

I know I sound like a broken record -- but what the "Aruban Justice Department" thinks they know, ain't necessarily what the KLPD knows!  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 29, 2007, 06:19:24 PM
Quote
[Is there any truth to the rumor that the Miss Teen who did her Arlene Schippers impression will be hired as the new spokesperson to explain the hybrid Dutch law?/quote]  :lol: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 29, 2007, 06:19:58 PM
I asked this in musings and didn'y get any response. I will try here.
  Has there been any definate date as to yet when Paul Reynolds will start posting here?  TIA !!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 29, 2007, 06:24:41 PM
ABC TODAY  
 
Business address SALINA CERCA 39-H, NOORD 
Legal form  LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 
Name of the company  MEDIAMAX ARUBA N.V. 
Statutory seat  ARUBA 
Date of incorporation  14 MAY 2002 
     
Main branch: MEDIAMAX ARUBA N.V. registered under number 28973
located at CAYA G.F. (BETICO) CROES 9, ORANJESTAD OOST 
NOT IN POSSESION OF A BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENT LICENCE 
   
DIRECTORS - AUTHORIZED PERSONS AND CORPORATE BODIES - SUPERVISORY BOARD: 
 
BOSET, PATRICK JOHN
Residing in  PARADERA 35, PARADERA, ARUBA 
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, GOIRLE on 28 DECEMBER 1967 
Nationality  DUTCH 
Position  MANAGING DIRECTOR 
Effective  14 MAY 2002 
Authority  FULL 
   
RENFRO, JULIA CHRISTINE
Residing in  SALINA CERCA 39-H, NOORD, ARUBA 
Born in  U.S.A., CALIFORNIE on 30 AUGUST 1966 
Nationality  AMERICAN 
Position  PROXY A W/T "ASST. MANAGER" 
Effective  27 JUNE 2007 
Authority  FULL 



Mediamax Aruba N.V. Director Patrick J. Boset Editor Felix J. Schoonbeek Layout & Design Linda van der Windt Sales Marlene Purcell Felix J. Schoonbeek ...
www.leconcierge.mediamaxaruba.com/www/news.htm
(link removed)
MediaMax Aruba inaugurates the first information kiosk!
The very first interactive digital information kiosk is placed at the Marriott
MediaMax Aruba recently inaugurated the first information kiosk in the lobby of the Aruba Marriott Resort & Stellaris Casino, right next to the front desk, where it can't be missed.
Go have a look and try the kiosk to familiarize yourself with Aruba's fastest, easiest and coolest way to acquire information about the hotel, the island of Aruba, and the various companies providing their services such as: car rentals, real estate, recreational activities, restaurants & bars, nightlife and much more.
Using high quality pictures and streaming video, the system will provide you with valuable information about the listed companies.
Some companies even provide discount coupons, which can be printed out.
The printout can also serve as a reference to make your reservation; the coupon will have the name and telephone number of the selected company, which can be used to make a reservation.
Stay tuned for the next locations!!
http://tinyurl.com/3bvmdu


just me - Party Poker Com ... exit to eden movie download, las ...
Establishment Aruba Hilton Hotel Casablanca Resort www pattty patty patty .... media Net I changed from medianet unlimited to mediamax and mail Signup www. ...
26cpartypokercom.blogspot.com/

This blog is now dedicated to correcting the mis- information being distributed by Dan Riehl. IMHO and research, Dan is fed his information from Julia Renfro of Aruba-Today a special friend of the VanDerSloot family. It is no surprise that they are trying to turn public opinion into believing that Joran is innocent and Natalee is at least partially to blame for her own demise with the old SODDI defense. Julia and her staff contacted many blogs and forum owners immediately to be an inside source.
http://ihoppers.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 06:36:31 PM
I asked this in musings and didn'y get any response. I will try here.
  Has there been any definate date as to yet when Paul Reynolds will start posting here?  TIA !!!

Angie - not sure why it's important to you but why don't you email Red?  He would be the one who knows. 

red@scaredmonkeys.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 29, 2007, 06:40:35 PM
I asked this in musings and didn'y get any response. I will try here.
  Has there been any definate date as to yet when Paul Reynolds will start posting here?  TIA !!!

Angie - not sure why it's important to you but why don't you email Red?  He would be the one who knows. 

red@scaredmonkeys.com

 TY Klaas.. I know Reds email addy. I am sending you and Im. I am not going to post here why I asked . 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Elaine on August 29, 2007, 06:50:34 PM
I am glad I had my dinner before I saw those pictures of Renho. :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 06:50:35 PM
So I guess this means KLPD won't be back in Aruba in September...it is November now? Same as TES. Strange. Anywho...I have been looking around here http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/aruba.html and found some pictures...not finished looking yet. Did we ever find out who Renfro's man is?
Here is a link to Soul Bch photos '05
http://www.guiafashion.com/fashion/internacional/27to29-05-05soulbeach/index.htm

A paid escort most likely.


Lmao...he IS Hot...too hot4her, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 06:58:40 PM
I am glad I had my dinner before I saw those pictures of Renho. :P

 :lol: :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 06:59:32 PM
Rick
Guest
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 2:01 pm  Post subject:  Re: Hollaway
Hi, I am from Canada. I landed in Aruba and went to the Holiday Inn on May 29th - the day before Natalee went missing. Let me tell you something - I did not see one local police officer in that hotel - as a male guest staying with another male guest, I would have thought the place would be crawling with local police at least questioning everyone there in order to determine if anyone saw her. Nothing! The only presence at that hotel was her family organizing a search for their daughter and the American news media (thank God for the pressure the American News media exerted on the local justice system otherwise I don't think the locals would have done anything). That being said, the locals should be ashamed at how long it took them to organize a search and how long it took them to detain and interrogate the people that were last seen with her. The outside world needs to keep the pressure on these people to determine what has happened to this young girl. Every day I hope to see the U.S. Authorities ask people not to travel to Aruba until the case is solved - it is the only way the local Government will put the appropriate resources to solving it. Trust me, that judge they brought in from the local island of Curacao spent his weekends golfing with Paul Van der Sloot - both islands are under Dutch rule and the legal circle is very small. Americans, stay away until the Aruban/Dutch Government puts a real effort into this search!
http://www.caribbeanmag.com/forum/hollaway-2601.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 29, 2007, 07:13:05 PM
Klaas, if this doesn't belong here, will you move it.

I found the following very interesting. For anyone who does not know Ann Rule. She is a true crime writer, former Seattle policewoman, and arthur of 19 or more NY Times bestsellers.

                          A NOTE ON LIARS

In a sense, all my stories are about liars. Some of the killers I write about have lied all their lives, and some have lied only to throw their victims off balance so that they become vulnerable. Once a lie is successful in giving a person what he or she wants, it grows and multiplies, burnished and perfected until it works everytime. It's a sad irony that the more honest a potential victim is, the more innocent, the more likely such a person is to become prey.  Honest people do not expect to be lied to, because they wouldn't lie to someone else.  That doesn't matter at all to dedicated liars. They only smile.

Their ability to twist the truth make them as belivable as preachers in the pulpit-and as evil as the dark forces any minister decries.

All their crimes were examples of conscienceless cruelty. Perhaps more shocking is the fact that they were so often forgiven and were offered so many chances to start over.  In the end, each reverted to type; they were as dangerous as a rabid lion in the street.


How long do you think it will be until Joran reverts to type?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 07:21:37 PM
Same site.....pg2 Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:39 pm  Post subject:  Aruba
Funny how Arubians say the Island is so safe and things like that usually never happen. The Island is not safe. We traveled there a few years ago and we were robbed up by the lighthouse. We went to the police and they just kind of laughed alittle and said it happens all the time. We also say another couple in there the same time and they were also robbed by the beach, all of there things and clothes. If you notice the cops have alot of jewelry on and have alot of other things. Have a feeling they might even be a little part of it all. Safe no way, pretty much ran to my plane. Even the taxi services gave us a hassel about wanting more money at the airport. My husband told him off and we ran to the plane and I will never go back. Just remember Aruba is not a safe place no matter what they say. 
 
 

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 07:30:24 PM
Klaas, if this doesn't belong here, will you move it.

I found the following very interesting. For anyone who does not know Ann Rule. She is a true crime writer, former Seattle policewoman, and arthur of 19 or more NY Times bestsellers.

                          A NOTE ON LIARS

In a sense, all my stories are about liars. Some of the killers I write about have lied all their lives, and some have lied only to throw their victims off balance so that they become vulnerable. Once a lie is successful in giving a person what he or she wants, it grows and multiplies, burnished and perfected until it works everytime. It's a sad irony that the more honest a potential victim is, the more innocent, the more likely such a person is to become prey.  Honest people do not expect to be lied to, because they wouldn't lie to someone else.  That doesn't matter at all to dedicated liars. They only smile.

Their ability to twist the truth make them as belivable as preachers in the pulpit-and as evil as the dark forces any minister decries.

All their crimes were examples of conscienceless cruelty. Perhaps more shocking is the fact that they were so often forgiven and were offered so many chances to start over.  In the end, each reverted to type; they were as dangerous as a rabid lion in the street.


How long do you think it will be until Joran reverts to type?



I love Ann Rule. I have read nearly every book she has written and in fact am reading one now. (Well, not this minute, but you know). I read all true crime. Love to get into the minds of the serial killers and such. It fascinates me. My bookcase is full of it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on August 29, 2007, 07:34:41 PM
Me too Nut, I just started her latest, Too Late To Say Goodbye. About the Georgia dentist.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 07:41:06 PM

Could have been both Freddy and Satish at C&C's.Joran targeted Natalee,Satish was with Deepak and Joran in the beginning of their night,Freddy just shows up at C&C's possible with a few other pimps.Satish could have been dropped off at home before their pimp game began and Freddy(and possible a few other pimps)had their sick fun with Natalee.Dropping Satish off at home before their sick games began could also be a way for Deepak to protect his brother.

Wasn't there something about Deepak and Satish going to talk to "some friends" at C and C's?  could those friends have been Freddy and other pimps? One of them said they were talking to friends, and when he turned around he couldn't find the others and went out to the car.  I think that was Deepak.
[/quote]
I think that was Deepak that said that.Not sure....back at work now after a long summer off just....sux lol
Sorry for the long wait in replying.
:)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 29, 2007, 07:43:47 PM
Thanks Igsigs!

Bondia 8/29/07 - translated by Arubagirl and posted at RU by Sunmoonstars:

Article Bon Dia Aruba...Arubagirl translation

It still hasn't been decided if the Dutch team has to return to Aruba
In November The Justice Department Will Take a Decision on the Nataly [sic] Holloway Case

Oranjestad. The developments in the investigations of the disappearance case of Nataly [sic] Holloway case have changed. This is what Bon Dia Aruba could conclude after an interview with the spokeswoman for the Justice Department mr. [lawyer --ag] Vivian van der Biezen.

Previously Bon Dia Aruba had published that the Dutch investigative team returned to the Netherlands because of the vacation season and that the intention was to return next month to continue the investigations together with the Aruban team. After the Dutch team returned to the Netherlands, the Aruban team continued the necessary investigations.

Bon Dia Aruba understood from the Justice Department that the decision has been made to evaluate all the information produced by the investigations. This will take the necessary time and during the evaluation of the information it will be seen if assistance from the Netherlands is still necessary. If this is necessary they will be called to return but if this is not necessary, than the Justice Department will conclude from the gathered information what is going to happen with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case.  

The Justice Department stipulated that in November 2007 a decision will be made with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case. The Justice Department will choose to commence a criminal case against the three suspects who are Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe, or the Justice Department will decide that there is not sufficient evidence to start a criminal case and will let the case go.

It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.
---
Bon Dia Aruba, Page A3, Wednesday August 29, 2007

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 07:45:04 PM
From Joran's June 9, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=160.0

On Sunday, I do not remember the date any more, I went at approximately 16.00 hours, to the "Excelsior Casino" at the Holiday Inn Hotel to play "Texas Hold'm poker". (with this the suspect is talking about May 29th 2005). I went with my father named "Paul van der SLOOT" to the casino. I went to play "Texas Hold'm Poker" with my father. It is a poker game in which you get 7 cards and you have to make a card combination with your best (5) cards. You get 500 U.S. $ of fake money and with this money you play. I was done sooner than my father and I went and hung around in the casino. When it was half time of the game my father wanted to go home to go and babysit my ten year old brother. At my father's request I sat in for him and played "Texas Hold'm poker. I am not sure as to when half time was but I think it was between 19.00 and 20.00 hours. I kept on gambling until I lost too. This was according to me until 21.30 to 22.00 hours. I went to walk around in the casino and after that went to the "Blackjack" table to play blackjack. While I was sitting at the table the girl "Natalee" that is missing now to the blackjack table together with her friends. When the English speaking girls came to the blackjack table they introduced themselves. I do not remember the names of the girls anymore but they were from the same group of students that Natalee belonged to. According to me the friends of Natalee played blackjack but Natalee didn't. A girl that was sitting at my left side on the table asked me in English if I could help her play blackjack because she had lost U.S. $ 360,= of her father's money. The girl bet U.S. $ 20,= in the game and I helped her win U.S. $ 100,= with it. After the girl had won U.S. $ 100,= I advised her to call it quits but she wanted to continue. I told her again that she should stop and her friends also said that she should stop. Probably the girl after that went to cash in her chips for money. The girlfriends of the girl asked me if I was going to "Carlos & Charlies" that night. I told them that I couldn't do that because I had school tomorrow. The girls kept insisting that I should meet them at "Carlos & Charlies" because it was their last night on Aruba. After they kept insisting I agreed to meet with at "Carlos & Charlies".

From Jaime's June 17, 2005 statement:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.



So Joran claims he was asked to go to CnC by the MB kids sometime after 22:00.  Jaimie claims Joran called him between 16:00 and 19:00 and told him about the American girls and CnC.

Which is it?
 
What it is is part of a pimps plans to go to C&C's long before any MB kids"begged"him to go.IMO Natalee was targeted.

In other words, they were not invited by anyone.
Exactly.....just part of thier pimpy plans,the way the game is played.Send Joran out to pick the victim,target,follow victim around then they cart the victim off to Joran's pad where the rest of the pimpy gang is waiting including Freddy who videos the game in action.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 07:47:12 PM
If Satish wasn't there, and it was Freddy instead, I would think the object would be to protect Freddy.

Later, I can hypothesize that Deepak would be protective of Satish, because it would be easy to trip him up.

Why would Deepak go along with Joran on keeping Freddy totally out? Perhaps Freddy threatened to tell what Joran did to Natalee if he became involved, and Deepak went along because Deepak was also involved?

Well. to put Freddie with Joran that night you would need to leave out a Kalpoe.  Who says it has to be Satish?  Maybe Satish used Deepak's car????

Just playing around with this whole concept of Freddie versus one of the Kalpose....will have to give it some more thought.
Could have been both Freddy and Satish at C&C's.Joran targeted Natalee,Satish was with Deepak and Joran in the beginning of their night,Freddy just shows up at C&C's possible with a few other pimps.Satish could have been dropped off at home before their pimp game began and Freddy(and possible a few other pimps)had their sick fun with Natalee.Dropping Satish off at home before their sick games began could also be a way for Deepak to protect his brother.

Because freddy knows what paulus did.  jvds had to pass because she was a Virgin.
I don't know if Natalee was a virgin or not,doesn't matter but IMO I think they had no choice in hiding her.....Paulus's DNA was on her and Anita is blind as a nasty bat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 07:55:10 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

According to me Joran said to her that we were at the hotel. She got out. I had not seen this. I heard something fall. I heard Joran say in Papiamentu shit she has fallen down. Joran exited through the same car door as where she had fallen down to help her up. That was the right back door. I had seen the girl on the ground. I saw Joran help her. I saw that the girl turned around and pushed Joran into the car. I heard that she said something to Joran. I was unable to hear what she had said to Joran. The car radio had been turned down somewhat, the volume was maybe at the nine level or something like that. Joran looked surprised. She walked away from Joran. What I saw is that she was walking towards the lobby. I did not see her enter the lobby. I saw that she leaned against a pillar with one hand. Joran had gotten back into the car and was sitting behind Satish. In the lobby I saw a man walking up to the girl. I saw that he had a radio in his left hand. I assumed that he was talking into the radio because he held it closely in front of his mouth. It was a dark coloured man. He was fairly tall. He wore a black T-shirt and black pants.

Deepak in drivers seat,Satish in front passenger seat,Joran behind Satish on right of car,Natalee supposedly behind Deepak in left of car....did Natalee climb over big ole doofus Joran to exit from the right side of the car?
Also....for all of those from aol message boards who said Deepak did not ID a dark skinned man....he did.
:P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 08:04:36 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
I agree,Deepak probably doesn't know what happened to Natalee after he left...Deepak still doesn't know but just in case Deepak tells a couple more lies to cover in case the ALE and prosecutor should TRY(yeah right,hahaha)to do a competant investigation.So Deepak told the tall tale about Joran being bruised.....wonder what injuries he imagined for Natalee IF he actually heard her falling to the ground over that loud music from his car?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 08:07:45 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

According to me Joran said to her that we were at the hotel. She got out. I had not seen this. I heard something fall. I heard Joran say in Papiamentu shit she has fallen down. Joran exited through the same car door as where she had fallen down to help her up. That was the right back door. I had seen the girl on the ground. I saw Joran help her. I saw that the girl turned around and pushed Joran into the car. I heard that she said something to Joran. I was unable to hear what she had said to Joran. The car radio had been turned down somewhat, the volume was maybe at the nine level or something like that. Joran looked surprised. She walked away from Joran. What I saw is that she was walking towards the lobby. I did not see her enter the lobby. I saw that she leaned against a pillar with one hand. Joran had gotten back into the car and was sitting behind Satish. In the lobby I saw a man walking up to the girl. I saw that he had a radio in his left hand. I assumed that he was talking into the radio because he held it closely in front of his mouth. It was a dark coloured man. He was fairly tall. He wore a black T-shirt and black pants.

Deepak in drivers seat,Satish in front passenger seat,Joran behind Satish on right of car,Natalee supposedly behind Deepak in left of car....did Natalee climb over big ole doofus Joran to exit from the right side of the car?
Also....for all of those from aol message boards who said Deepak did not ID a dark skinned man....he did.
:P


Deepak just goes into too much detail.  He even knows what the volume level of his car was on when Natalee pushed Joran.  In another statement we have Deepak saying when they left in the car he had the volume up loud and he could not hear what they were talking about but then he heard the word Hitler.  He then says he lowered the radio and he heard every word Natalee was saying which included the Hitler relation and her living on a plantation.  He must have good eyesight also because he saw Natalee on the floor.  I bet he did see Natalee on the floor because he was present when Joran beat her.

Deepak is FOS.  The volume on the radio was pumped up to the max so no one would hear Natalee's screams.  I hope Deepak and Satish have nightmares for the rest of their life for what they did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 08:13:28 PM
Deepak's June 10th Statement:

To your question whether or not we pick up girls when we go for example to "Carlos & Charlies", I can state the following. Yes, we from time to time pick up girls there.

To your question whether these are local girls or tourists, I can state the following. They are tourists.[/b]To your question as to who is the one who makes the first move towards the girls we are going to pick up, I can state the following. It usually is Joran or another friend with the name Freddy Zedan.

To your question as to what role Joran plays in our circle of friends, I can state the following. He has no real role. We are all the same.

To your question as to where we take the girls we pick up, I can state the following. Sometimes the girls stay at "Carlos & Charlies" or sometimes we take them to their hotel.

To your question was to what exactly happens when we have picked up the girls, I can state the following. Just kissing and dancing.

To your question whether sexual intercourse has happened, I can state the following. Yes, it has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that all of us, so in one room, had sexual intercourse, I can state the following. It has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that the three of us had sexual intercourse with a girl, I can state the following. That has never happened.

Deepak is so full of bull caca.Look at the guy....you know he will take what ever is offered even if it's a party with a local girl and he is 5th in line.
I wonder what he means by saying when they pick up girls they sometimes go to C&C's....what if they pick up the girl AT C&C's?Does C&C's have after hours parties?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 08:16:22 PM
Deepak's June 10th Statement:

To your question as to why I reasonably quickly had an attorney, I can state the following. After we were heard as witnesses, Joran's father said that there would be chance that we were going to be arrested and that we had to prepare for that eventuality.

To you question as to how we prepared ourselves, I can state the following. With preparing I just meant looking for an attorney.

To your question whether I had spoken to my attorney prior to my arrest, I can state the following. Both families had a meeting with the attorneys. So my parents with me and my brother and Joran with his parents.

To your question as to when that had taken place, I can state the following. That took place last Saturday.

To your question as to where it took place, I can state the following. It took place in the offices of my attorney.

To your question whether both families went to one office or to several offices, I can state the following. We all went to the same office at the same time. asked us if the statement we had made as witnesses was the truth and said thatOur attorney   we should stick to that story.

OUR atty?Or could he mean our attyS?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 08:17:57 PM
Yes - it's all a lie BUT

Why does he mention falling down?  Why does he mention Joran was pushed into the car?  IMO it's to cover for any injuries found on Natalee or Joran.
The Falling Down and hurting her head statement is all about covering-up for some kind of brutality, but what I find most interesting about this is they must have thought there was some chance Natalee might be found.
At least that could be what Deepak thought at the time.I'm sure Joran lies-a-lot knows much more about where Natalee is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 08:21:44 PM
 :arrow:  They do have to prosecute, and will. IMO

Y'all know how to prune these Bon Dia articles by now, right?  ----> A decision will be made in November <----

All the rest is typical. *We are in charge - Justice dept. will decide - ALE dangling the KLPD*. The reality is that the KLPD has been in charge for the last year and hand picked a few ALE to assist, period. They have completed, or near completed, their investigation and only now do the PTBs start crowing.

Which is a good thing. If nothing was going to happen why reclaim ownership when there is opportunity to lay the blame on the KLPD? Accountability is treated like a disease in that system and i don't think they found a sudden cure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 08:23:38 PM
DANA PRETZER - Tonight 9PM ET

This week’s guests include:

Ed Lozzi - Former Publicist for the late Lana Clarkson. Music producer Phil Spector is currently on trial for her murder.

Mike McIntyre - Host of the Mike on Crime Radio Show. Mr. McIntyre will be discussing Serial Pedophile Peter Whitmore, and other high-profile cases.
 
Randy Shaffer - Father of Brian Shaffer, missing since April 2, 2006.
 
Pastor E.J. Scott, author of Hurricane Katrina: The Best Thing That Ever Happened to Me on the 2nd anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s landfall.

http://scaredmonkeys.com/radio/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 08:26:19 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

I then searched for them in the club but without result. Then I went to look near the bathrooms. I also didn't find them there, I then used the bathroom myself. . After I walked out of the bathroom, I called Joran on his mobile phone. He did not answer. I walked to the parking lot where my car was parked. When I arrived at my car I sat on the ground next to my car, because my brother had the keys. I then called my brother on his mobile phone. I had almot no more minutes on my pre-paid phone so I called him in a way that produces what in English is called a “miss call”. After that my brother phoned me back, I asked him where they were and he said they were still inside and that he would come. After a while Satish came walking, I asked him where Joran was and he said that Joran was still inside. I told Satish to give me the keys and to go find Joran. Satish left again and I got into my car. I stayed inside of the car with the door open. I had one leg outside the car and I was playing music and adjusting my radio set-up. After a while I heard the door on the passenger side open. I saw Satish getting into the car. Joran opened the door behind Satish and also got into the car. I cannot remember if the girl got into the same car door. I do know that she sat down behind me. I turned around somewhat and introduced myself to the girl. She had told me that her name was Natalee.

Didn't Deepak say in another so called interrogation that he hadn't spoken to Natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 29, 2007, 08:38:27 PM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.

Which data do KLPD return to Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 29, 2007, 08:58:36 PM
In November The Justice Department Will Make a Decision on the Natalee Holloway Case

It still hasn’t been decided if the Dutch team has to return to Aruba

Oranjestad. The developments in the investigations of the disappearance case of Nataly [sic] Holloway case have changed. This is what Bon Dia Aruba could conclude after an interview with the spokeswoman for the Justice Department mr. [lawyer—ag] Vivian van der Biezen.

Previously Bon Dia Aruba had published that the Dutch investigative team returned to the Netherlands because of the vacation season and that the intention was to return next month to continue the investigations together with the Aruban team. After the Dutch team returned to the Netherlands, the Aruban team continued the necessary investigations.

Bon Dia Aruba understood from the Justice Department that the decision has been made to evaluate all the information produced by the investigations. This will take the necessary time and during the evaluation of the information it will be seen if assistance from the Netherlands is still necessary. If this is necessary they will be called to return but if this is not necessary, than the Justice Department will conclude from the gathered information what is going to happen with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case.

The Justice Department stipulated that in November 2007 a decision will be made with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case. The Justice Department will choose to commence a criminal case against the three suspects who are Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe, or the Justice Department will decide that there is not sufficient evidence to start a criminal case and will let the case go.

It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.

Bon Dia Aruba, Page A3, Wednesday August 29, 2007
Translated by Agirl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 09:04:23 PM
NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 29, 2007, 09:05:36 PM
From Satish's June 11th Statement:

The statements I gave before were not entirely based on the truth.

I am now willing to make a statement in accordance with the truth.


On Sunday May 29th 2005, at approximately 21.45 hours I went to pick up my brother Deepak where he works. I went to pick up Deepak in Deepak's car. Deepak has a grey coloured car of the make Honda Civic. When I arrived at his place of work I waited for him. At approximately 22.10 Deepak got into the car. We drove from the Seaport Market Place to Taco Bell in Santa Cruz to buy something to eat. After we had bought something to eat at Taco Bell we drove home to eat. When we were sitting at home eating, my brother Deepak said to me that Joran had asked him if he could go to Carlos & Charlies. My brother told me that Joran had told him that he had on that day in the hours of the afternoon met a few girls in the casino, My brother did not tell me in which casino Joran had met these girls. I decided to go with my brother and Joran to Carlos & Charlies.

This is similar to what Jaime has said about a phone call from Joran.
This also sounds like Joran's plans were going along as usual.Sounds like he met the MB girls early in the day?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 29, 2007, 09:34:18 PM
NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?

Sorry I have no idea, Klaasend. I just can tell this, seems not good, but maybe I am not correct.
I know is missing cases in the Netherlands, It is not find to easy, about a track of somebody, and
sometimes/frequently must the police stop the research, because they have almost no useful tracks.
And when there is evidence material, that is sometimes to thin for somebody to arrested and bring to the judge.
The police and/or OM must have much/great evidence for to make a case.
And when this is happenen: When they have much/great evidence for a case.
In many cases, does speak the judge a easy and/or sometimes no sentence out.
I mean with that acquittal, or a little task sentence.
And that all, to large frustration of the Investigators.

But, when I anything hear, about the KLPD returned to Aruba. I want let u know!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ala_gunslinger on August 29, 2007, 09:38:14 PM
In November The Justice Department Will Make a Decision on the Natalee Holloway Case

It still hasn’t been decided if the Dutch team has to return to Aruba

Oranjestad. The developments in the investigations of the disappearance case of Nataly [sic] Holloway case have changed. This is what Bon Dia Aruba could conclude after an interview with the spokeswoman for the Justice Department mr. [lawyer—ag] Vivian van der Biezen.

Previously Bon Dia Aruba had published that the Dutch investigative team returned to the Netherlands because of the vacation season and that the intention was to return next month to continue the investigations together with the Aruban team. After the Dutch team returned to the Netherlands, the Aruban team continued the necessary investigations.

Bon Dia Aruba understood from the Justice Department that the decision has been made to evaluate all the information produced by the investigations. This will take the necessary time and during the evaluation of the information it will be seen if assistance from the Netherlands is still necessary. If this is necessary they will be called to return but if this is not necessary, than the Justice Department will conclude from the gathered information what is going to happen with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case.

The Justice Department stipulated that in November 2007 a decision will be made with the Nataly [sic] Holloway case. The Justice Department will choose to commence a criminal case against the three suspects who are Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe, or the Justice Department will decide that there is not sufficient evidence to start a criminal case and will let the case go.

It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.

Bon Dia Aruba, Page A3, Wednesday August 29, 2007
Translated by Agirl


I'm sorry, but I gotta call bullshit on this!  (Klass, I am sorry if I offend)

So they actually have a 'spokeswoman'  that can say something besides...'You just don't understand our system'.

I am sorry, but I will restate my previous opinion...

I see no evidence of a system!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 09:49:45 PM
Deepak's June 11th Statement:

I then searched for them in the club but without result. Then I went to look near the bathrooms. I also didn't find them there, I then used the bathroom myself. . After I walked out of the bathroom, I called Joran on his mobile phone. He did not answer. I walked to the parking lot where my car was parked. When I arrived at my car I sat on the ground next to my car, because my brother had the keys. I then called my brother on his mobile phone. I had almot no more minutes on my pre-paid phone so I called him in a way that produces what in English is called a “miss call”. After that my brother phoned me back, I asked him where they were and he said they were still inside and that he would come. After a while Satish came walking, I asked him where Joran was and he said that Joran was still inside. I told Satish to give me the keys and to go find Joran. Satish left again and I got into my car. I stayed inside of the car with the door open. I had one leg outside the car and I was playing music and adjusting my radio set-up. After a while I heard the door on the passenger side open. I saw Satish getting into the car. Joran opened the door behind Satish and also got into the car. I cannot remember if the girl got into the same car door. I do know that she sat down behind me. I turned around somewhat and introduced myself to the girl. She had told me that her name was Natalee.

Didn't Deepak say in another so called interrogation that he hadn't spoken to Natalee?

Yes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 29, 2007, 09:51:31 PM
Recap

Dave says he gets weekly updates from FBI. That the KLPD and FBI are working together...and not letting the distractors (read: ALE / AHATA) come between them.

DeWitte's reported *case closed* announcement never happened.

KLPD returning in September.

Cigars are on robots.

Which data do KLPD return to Aruba?
I think it is unknown NYC. Posting this yesterday...i was quoting an old Bon Dia article. Today they reported a new story.

I should have gone by Lazlo's info, who reported that the KLPD were in limbo...over a month ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 10:20:19 PM
 :smt102 must be getting tired...can't seem to figure out what year this is> (found it on a goole search) http://145.37.208.76/160503/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 29, 2007, 10:23:23 PM
It can be expected that whatever decision the Justice Department takes, this will have international coverage and possibly there will be members of the American press once more on Aruba to search for information and bring this into publicity as they see fit and consequently this could hurt the image of our island.
Oh who cares about the freaking image ? The place is a crap can that stinks and the stink will stay up your nose forever !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 10:25:45 PM
HURT the image of your island from HELL ????????????????????????


HUH????????????


hurt it worse than it already has.

its a HELL HOLE and the ONLY way for it to get better is for JUSTICE


gessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhh


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 10:25:49 PM
:smt102 must be getting tired...can't seem to figure out what year this is> (found it on a goole search) http://145.37.208.76/160503/

According to other photos in Aruba it was 2004.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Sue on August 29, 2007, 10:30:15 PM
NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?


I think if they close the case all HELL is going to break loose


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 10:33:34 PM
NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?


I think if they close the case all HELL is going to break loose


 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 10:36:22 PM
The second weekend
February 12 2005



The second weekend was great too! From work straight to the Paddock where we had a few drinks, then off to a steak house. That food proved to be a good basis for the night out. In the Paddock we met heaps of people including some surfdudes who re-named Ilse and I, modepopje (fashionista) and surfchick respectively. Ilse already scored free wind surf lessons. Good on ya girl! I scored some free snorkeling lessons, but hey, I'd rather go scubadiving or windsurfing ;-)

Later that night we went to Carlos 'n Charlies where we found out what dancing really means here in Aruba. Turns out that white girls can dance (after a 1,5 meter cocktail of course). The next night was just as great

Sandwich in the Carlos 'n Charlies with Joran

(http://145.37.208.76/160503/images/sandwich.jpg)

She was in Aruba:

Aruba, Dutch Antilles
February 4 till the first of July 2005



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 10:37:04 PM
too many LIES

too many missing ITEMS

too many different stories that have CHANGED too many times



this case is SICKENING.......

NOT if, BUT when they LOCK PAULUS up.....it will be a nice day

 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 10:38:01 PM
:smt102 must be getting tired...can't seem to figure out what year this is> (found it on a goole search) http://145.37.208.76/160503/

According to other photos in Aruba it was 2004.


So loverboy was at C&C's in 2004...he would have been 16. :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 29, 2007, 10:39:15 PM
:smt102 must be getting tired...can't seem to figure out what year this is> (found it on a goole search) http://145.37.208.76/160503/

According to other photos in Aruba it was 2004.


So loverboy was at C&C's in 2004...he would have been 16. :2doh:


Ahhhhhh....ok ty Klaas...2005 k


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 10:41:04 PM
is that the only shirt the sporter has ???



 :-?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 29, 2007, 10:42:02 PM
I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 29, 2007, 10:47:23 PM
NYC - thanks, it was already posted a couple pages back.  What do you make of it?


I think if they close the case all HELL is going to break loose

Oh yeah, that goes sure happened! Believe me. That hell is going break loose soon, inside a year.
Well, I know some investigators been good, but KLPD?
I only know they work good, in child porn cases and crimes again children.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 10:50:08 PM
I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

It's already been posted 2 or 3 times today.  I think it's alot of Bondia wishful thinking, IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 10:52:35 PM
I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

well, i think it is OUT of aruba's Rotten little hands

more BS from the writers  :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 29, 2007, 10:53:46 PM
I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

CBB, the reason why the Netherlands came to Aruba was because Rudy Croes invited them.  At the end of the day it is the Aruban prosecutor who will make the final decision whether to prosecute or not.  In my opinion that prosecutor will listen to anything Rudy Croes tells them to do.

Rudy Croes is corrupt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 10:58:52 PM
Natalee was NEVER on the beach.


NEVER


she was somewhere, probably at the sloot slaughterhouse.

the beech story is only real in the sense that the killers WENT to the beech but they did not have Natalee with them..... it was a disguise. tell the world we were at the beach, she fell asleep....blah blah blah...

not a single person with an ounce of CREDIBILITY has any prrof Natalee was EVER on the beach...

seeing sharks

went for a swim

made out on the beach

lost my shoes


ALL LIES


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 29, 2007, 11:01:58 PM
Natalee was NEVER on the beach.


NEVER


she was somewhere, probably at the sloot slaughterhouse.

the beech story is only real in the sense that the killers WENT to the beech but they did not have Natalee with them..... it was a disguise. tell the world we were at the beach, she fell asleep....blah blah blah...

not a single person with an ounce of CREDIBILITY has any prrof Natalee was EVER on the beach...

seeing sharks

went for a swim

made out on the beach

lost my shoes


ALL LIES

I agree never on the beach...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 29, 2007, 11:06:00 PM
the beach story leaves all kinds of other people to blame  :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

since when do three LOSERS listen to a young lady about where she wants to go...

why the beach???? 

no reason, except to be able to blame others or to blame Natalee herself.


i aint buying it, Joran is a terrible poker player  :cool:

he thinks he is really a good player   :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 29, 2007, 11:08:45 PM
I hope you're right, Klaas!

It absolutely burns me up! The "press coverage" could damage their island!? The FACT that a murdered tourist has been IGNORED and COVERED UP by their own Police Department IS NOT the hurtful thing to their island, Oh NO! The press coverage of the event is the problem!

The FACT that there are page after page of DOCUMENTED lies by the last known suspects to be with Natalee is no problem at all, as long as there is no one there to report it!

This island has to be convinced by some force, that furthering the "sweep under the rug" strategy is NOT the path to restoring their tourism trade. BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, until these idiots decide to hold Natalee's life in worthy regard! No one has ever suggested that horrible crimes only happen on that island. BUT, for the love of God, go after the truth and follow the path of Justice wherever it honestly leads!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 29, 2007, 11:14:01 PM
I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

CBB, the reason why the Netherlands came to Aruba was because Rudy Croes invited them.  At the end of the day it is the Aruban prosecutor who will make the final decision whether to prosecute or not.  In my opinion that prosecutor will listen to anything Rudy Croes tells them to do.

Rudy Croes is corrupt.

OH, SAN! Say it ain't so! Please, Please, Please!
We have got to do something! Beth's book will be out by then, maybe it will stir up enough outrage that they'll finally give up this path of denial and cover-up and finally hold those responsible accountable for what they've done!

I really think they believe it would be worse for them to reveal the truth than to just try to keep the lid on it. What can we do to convince them otherwise?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sb on August 29, 2007, 11:41:20 PM
I am not going to lose any sleep over the November rumor because Aruba has NEVER held to any deadline or timeframe that they have set, not ONCE, since the beginning of the case.

They will do as much of nothing as they can get away with. Stall, delay, hinder and confuse. Indefinitely. That's what they do. They want this to drag out forever and fade from view.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 29, 2007, 11:41:57 PM
I'm sorry to "requote" myself, but I really want to know what you all think about that article that was posted. It's long so I won't repost it, but:

If I understand this correctly, Aruba will decide if further assisitance is needed from the Netherlands to determine if they will proceed to prosecute this case or let it go? WTF!?

If Aruba gets to decide, why did the Netherlands even bother coming to Aruba? That's like giving the fox the keys to the chicken coup. There is a criminal corruption case to made against ALE, and I'm just sure that they will overlook that in order to pursue justice. There is SO much to lead to THAT conclusion!

Am I missing something here?

CBB, the reason why the Netherlands came to Aruba was because Rudy Croes invited them.  At the end of the day it is the Aruban prosecutor who will make the final decision whether to prosecute or not.  In my opinion that prosecutor will listen to anything Rudy Croes tells them to do.

Rudy Croes is corrupt.

OH, SAN! Say it ain't so! Please, Please, Please!
We have got to do something! Beth's book will be out by then, maybe it will stir up enough outrage that they'll finally give up this path of denial and cover-up and finally hold those responsible accountable for what they've done!

I really think they believe it would be worse for them to reveal the truth than to just try to keep the lid on it. What can we do to convince them otherwise?

If you all are awaiting ARUBA to do the right thing -- you will be sorely disappointed! The only way this will come to fruition (and it IS coming) is when the KLPD AND the FBI expose the corruption.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 29, 2007, 11:45:42 PM
I am not going to lose any sleep over the November rumor because Aruba has NEVER held to any deadline or timeframe that they have set, not ONCE, since the beginning of the case.

They will do as much of nothing as they can get away with. Stall, delay, hinder and confuse. Indefinitely. That's what they do. They want this to drag out forever and fade from view.


if it's left to aruba, that's exactly what they'll do.  hopefully the article is a pipedream and the klpd and holland will remain in charge.  aruba does have a new prosecutor and maybe that will make a difference.  we can hope anyway.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 29, 2007, 11:49:52 PM
This is actually pretty funny.  Glenda has finally posted over at RU and her post was immediately contradicted by an interview of Joe T.:   :lol: :lol:

Glenda wrote:
Quote
The ALE had no records from any of Natalee's Family. They asked for her Year Book with an official international request of help in investigation and are still in waiting.

Americans don't seem to understand, the Aruban Authorities had no access to anything from MB, much less very important phone records that they were denied and still waiting access to.



Trixie wrote:
Quote
But then why would Joe T. say that he had seen them?

Bubbles wrote:
Quote
He not only saw them, he had them in his hands at one time when speaking.


AC wrote:   :wink:

Quote
Joe

I don't know, it shows the state of their investigation. they're looking at the speculation about the possiblity of an overdose. They're asking in this letter about that, phone calls from Twitty to Natalee

Greta:

She's asking about the trip that Beth Twitty made while Natalee was in aruba, all the phone calls made and received from her phone line and cell phone

Joe

We have phone records that reflect something quite contrary to what she's been saying about calls to/from her daughter.

Greta:

Extraordinarily perplexing...why a certified copy of Natalee's year book?

JOe

they are looking into the prospect she's a runaway, the students had talked about it...it sounds like I'm throwing things out, but these are Karin's words, they ask did Natalee ever run away from home when did it happen, did she make plans to meet a boy in Aruba.

Greta:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sb on August 30, 2007, 12:14:59 AM
Plus, the newspaper reporting from the island has a very poor track record of accuracy. The article simply means NOTHING.

A handful of people, up against a sovereign nation, will always have a VERY hard time trying to win the day. Natalee's family has always faced long odds in this fight. The full weight of a nation sold over to the Mafia and to the worldwide drugs-porno-gambling machine has been brought to bear on this case. And I repeat again that the Dutch are NOT, NOT, NOT on the side of Natalee's family here, they will find NO help there. As much as I want to be like robots and think that the Dutch will help, I know deep down that they won't and have never had any intentions of doing so. The KLPD thing is a diversion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 12:18:45 AM
 :lol:  @ Glenda    >  Did the maroons thank her yet? I love that...

Glenda posts: J2K are no longer suspects!

Idiot #1: Thank you Glenda!

Idiot #2: Why are they digging up the Sloot compound?

Glenda:   :shock:

Siddalee: The dig is to exculpate Joran!

Idiot chorus: That make sense! Glenda was right! Thank you!  

Glenda:   :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 12:23:18 AM
:lol:  @ Glenda    >  Did the maroons thank her yet? I love that...

Glenda posts: J2K are no longer suspects!

Idiot #1: Thank you Glenda!

Idiot #2: Why are they digging up the Sloot compound?

Glenda:   :shock:

Siddalee: The dig is to exculpate Joran!

Idiot chorus: That make sense! Glenda was right! Thank you!  

Glenda:   :wink:

The problem with Glenda is that people aren't affraid to prove her wong now, even at RU  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 12:28:24 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 12:33:22 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: robots on August 30, 2007, 12:34:14 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.


 :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 12:39:22 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.
I think we agree, kinda.

One thing i look forward to...never having to read an Aruban paper again. It's brutal!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 30, 2007, 12:41:19 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.

Well, I think what KLPD and ALE does is very strange, ALE give KLPD the research and what in the Netherlands, this case get to be silent. And just come in Opsporing Verzocht was come with a bit facts. Hello ALE AND KLPD we talk about A DISAPPEARED CASE and not about spoliation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 12:49:27 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.

Well, I think what KLPD and ALE does is very strange, ALE give KLPD the research and what in the Netherlands, this case get to be silent. And just come in Opsporing Verzocht was come with a bit facts. Hello ALE AND KLPD we talk about A DISAPPEARED CASE and not about spoliation.

Keep in mind the only side we are hearing from is ALE via Bondia.  Both have been known to lie and make false statements.  I really don't place much importance on that Bondia article.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 30, 2007, 12:49:47 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.

 We'll call it Hurricane Natalee!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 30, 2007, 12:55:24 AM
The date for Beth's Book release is October, right? There will be some interviews stemming from the release, I'm sure. The timing is good. If they try to drop this case, the circumstances will be fresh in everyone's mind.

Sounds like a perscription to hit tourism hard, to me. I hope that Aruba thinks this through.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: NYC_lover on August 30, 2007, 12:58:34 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.

Well, I think what KLPD and ALE does is very strange, ALE give KLPD the research and what in the Netherlands, this case get to be silent. And just come in Opsporing Verzocht was come with a bit facts. Hello ALE AND KLPD we talk about A DISAPPEARED CASE and not about spoliation.

Keep in mind the only side we are hearing from is ALE via Bondia.  Both have been known to lie and make false statements.  I really don't place much importance on that Bondia article.

I think u are right Klaasend. ALE, (and maybe KLPD) sees some disinformation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 30, 2007, 01:00:58 AM
ALE can't deny KLPD's return, say they don't need them...and then close the case.

There's an indication! What do y'all think? Any buyers?
Not sure what ALE or the Prosecutor's office will TRY to do.  I can tell you this, if they do try to tell the KLPD to "bug off" and close the case against the KLPD's recommendation, they will be unleashing a storm.

 We'll call it Hurricane Natalee!



I think many here still miss the point that the FBI is working WITH the KLPD. The "veil of secrecy" is broken. As much as Aruba may THINK they can sweep this under the rug -- they can't. I have no doubt Aruba will TRY to obfuscate -- but Pandora's Box is already open. ......... The most troubling aspect of all of this is it isn't gonna end by November  -- this is simply too big.  :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 30, 2007, 01:09:26 AM
Wreck? Do we know for sure that the FBI is working with the Dutch and to what extent they have been allowed to do so?

I'm not challenging your statement at all! I've just missed the specifics. TIA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 30, 2007, 01:15:14 AM
Wreck? Do we know for sure that the FBI is working with the Dutch and to what extent they have been allowed to do so?

I'm not challenging your statement at all! I've just missed the specifics. TIA.
I take Dave Holloway's word that he says the FBI is working WITH KLPD and he is getting weekly updates.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 01:16:10 AM
Wreck? Do we know for sure that the FBI is working with the Dutch and to what extent they have been allowed to do so?

I'm not challenging your statement at all! I've just missed the specifics. TIA.
not wreck, but...

Dave H. said he gets weekly updates from the FBI, that they are working with the KLPD and that attempts to disrupt the relationship have not worked.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: wreck on August 30, 2007, 01:37:06 AM
Wreck? Do we know for sure that the FBI is working with the Dutch and to what extent they have been allowed to do so?

I'm not challenging your statement at all! I've just missed the specifics. TIA.
not wreck, but...

Dave H. said he gets weekly updates from the FBI, that they are working with the KLPD and that attempts to disrupt the relationship have not worked.

If you take Dave's statements about the FBI involvement along with weekly updates -- add to this that Dave and Robin have sort of asked us to "stand down" -- and it supports my "hunch" that the family has been informed of the "outcome." I still think that the only "hold-up" is finalizing the "corruption" angle. That's why Aruba is "still in the dark." -- JMHO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 02:07:23 AM
If you take Dave's statements about the FBI involvement along with weekly updates -- add to this that Dave and Robin have sort of asked us to "stand down" -- and it supports my "hunch" that the family has been informed of the "outcome." I still think that the only "hold-up" is finalizing the "corruption" angle. That's why Aruba is "still in the dark." -- JMHO
This all sounds good. The "stand down" thingy was confusing...considering Dave's pointed (& highly effective) accusations on Geraldo. Maybe that was just incident specific, though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 30, 2007, 02:19:09 AM
That IS encouraging. Thanks for reminding me! I had forgotten Dave's statements.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JustMeT on August 30, 2007, 03:42:17 AM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

According to me Joran said to her that we were at the hotel. She got out. I had not seen this. I heard something fall. I heard Joran say in Papiamentu shit she has fallen down. Joran exited through the same car door as where she had fallen down to help her up. That was the right back door. I had seen the girl on the ground. I saw Joran help her. I saw that the girl turned around and pushed Joran into the car. I heard that she said something to Joran. I was unable to hear what she had said to Joran. The car radio had been turned down somewhat, the volume was maybe at the nine level or something like that. Joran looked surprised. She walked away from Joran. What I saw is that she was walking towards the lobby. I did not see her enter the lobby. I saw that she leaned against a pillar with one hand. Joran had gotten back into the car and was sitting behind Satish. In the lobby I saw a man walking up to the girl. I saw that he had a radio in his left hand. I assumed that he was talking into the radio because he held it closely in front of his mouth. It was a dark coloured man. He was fairly tall. He wore a black T-shirt and black pants.

Deepak in drivers seat,Satish in front passenger seat,Joran behind Satish on right of car,Natalee supposedly behind Deepak in left of car....did Natalee climb over big ole doofus Joran to exit from the right side of the car?
Also....for all of those from aol message boards who said Deepak did not ID a dark skinned man....he did.
:P


Deepak just goes into too much detail.  He even knows what the volume level of his car was on when Natalee pushed Joran.  In another statement we have Deepak saying when they left in the car he had the volume up loud and he could not hear what they were talking about but then he heard the word Hitler.  He then says he lowered the radio and he heard every word Natalee was saying which included the Hitler relation and her living on a plantation.  He must have good eyesight also because he saw Natalee on the floor.  I bet he did see Natalee on the floor because he was present when Joran beat her.

Deepak is FOS.  The volume on the radio was pumped up to the max so no one would hear Natalee's screams.  I hope Deepak and Satish have nightmares for the rest of their life for what they did.


I thought Satish made these claims? I could be wrong. Deepak has never claimed to have heard the so called hilter bs...I thought. But yes you are right, he is definitely full of it.
Some people pay attention to detail. Im sure he knew what he had the volume on. Its his thang. ;)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 30, 2007, 07:04:21 AM
Arubacide!!!!!!!(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/anothersuicide.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Leslie on August 30, 2007, 08:12:43 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
24ora
http://www.24ora.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 09:27:42 AM
Does anyone recall the killing of a tourist in 1996 on Aruba? I can't seem to find this info, if we have discussed it before.

"Aruba stands confessed as a safe island in the Caribbean area. Per
year 1 up to 3 assassinations are on average committed. The last time
that a tourist by violence for living came were in 1996."
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21638481/Nederlander_vast_om_vermist_meisje_Aruba.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 09:39:50 AM
 :2doh: The 'disinformation gang' sure had things screwed up right from the beginning...all the way to/from the Netherlands.

rn1970 :
natalee changed her hair color to black. cut her hair short. still hiding @ rock formations near big industrial company (near the sea).
i guess in puerto rico when she tried to do this 'missing thing' they found her verrrrrrry fast. but this times i think she succeded, een though aruba is much saller then puerto rico. they haven't found her yet. maybe she's happy this way. her friends knew about this. but nobody has the guts to say the truth. weird..

Gepubliceerd door lindsey . - 09 juni 23:25


http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/005443.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 10:01:16 AM
:2doh: The 'disinformation gang' sure had things screwed up right from the beginning...all the way to/from the Netherlands.

rn1970 :
natalee changed her hair color to black. cut her hair short. still hiding @ rock formations near big industrial company (near the sea).
i guess in puerto rico when she tried to do this 'missing thing' they found her verrrrrrry fast. but this times i think she succeded, een though aruba is much saller then puerto rico. they haven't found her yet. maybe she's happy this way. her friends knew about this. but nobody has the guts to say the truth. weird..

Gepubliceerd door lindsey . - 09 juni 23:25


http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/005443.html

My bet is that M1970 is the same person as MAZRAD and WONDERWOMAN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 10:03:09 AM
Isn't there suppos to be a motion to dismiss heard in court today? I may have that wrong, but I wonder if it will be set for another date again? Seems like everything else has been put off til Nov.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 10:04:56 AM
:2doh: The 'disinformation gang' sure had things screwed up right from the beginning...all the way to/from the Netherlands.

rn1970 :
natalee changed her hair color to black. cut her hair short. still hiding @ rock formations near big industrial company (near the sea).
i guess in puerto rico when she tried to do this 'missing thing' they found her verrrrrrry fast. but this times i think she succeded, een though aruba is much saller then puerto rico. they haven't found her yet. maybe she's happy this way. her friends knew about this. but nobody has the guts to say the truth. weird..

Gepubliceerd door lindsey . - 09 juni 23:25


http://www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/005443.html

My bet is that M1970 is the same person as MAZRAD and WONDERWOMAN.


no clue...but isn't it    r  n   - put together looks like a small m, lol.  m  rn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 10:06:25 AM
Isn't there suppos to be a motion to dismiss heard in court today? I may have that wrong, but I wonder if it will be set for another date again? Seems like everything else has been put off til Nov.

Yes, that is today.  I'll keep an eye out for updates.  I suspect it will be delayed again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 10:10:51 AM
Thank you, Klaas


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 30, 2007, 10:38:40 AM


I'm not challenging your statement at all! I've just missed the specifics. TIA.
[/quote]
not wreck, but...

Dave H. said he gets weekly updates from the FBI, that they are working with the KLPD and that attempts to disrupt the relationship have not worked.
[/quote]


good lands, i've missed something important - again.  where can i read about the attempts to disrupt the relationship between klpd and f.b.i.?  or better yet, just tell me here on the forums.  i sure hope they can tracks these attempts back to where they originated.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 10:40:47 AM
is that the only shirt the sporter has ???



 :-?

It has to be his 'pimpin' shirt :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 10:41:02 AM
Does anyone recall the killing of a tourist in 1996 on Aruba? I can't seem to find this info, if we have discussed it before.

"Aruba stands confessed as a safe island in the Caribbean area. Per
year 1 up to 3 assassinations are on average committed. The last time
that a tourist by violence for living came were in 1996."
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21638481/Nederlander_vast_om_vermist_meisje_Aruba.html

There was a woman from the U.S. that was mudered that year and that is the last one on Aruban records. Since then it appears they turned there backs or covered it up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 30, 2007, 10:45:32 AM
Does anyone recall the killing of a tourist in 1996 on Aruba? I can't seem to find this info, if we have discussed it before.

"Aruba stands confessed as a safe island in the Caribbean area. Per
year 1 up to 3 assassinations are on average committed. The last time
that a tourist by violence for living came were in 1996."
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21638481/Nederlander_vast_om_vermist_meisje_Aruba.html

Wasn't that the year before Amy Bradley went missing?  I know she was not on Aruba, but wasn't there a mention of some crew members wanting to take her to CnC's during the stop in Aruba?

There was a woman from the U.S. that was mudered that year and that is the last one on Aruban records. Since then it appears they turned there backs or covered it up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 30, 2007, 10:55:33 AM
Good Morning!  Does anyone know if the Internet Cafe closed at 10 or 11PM on that Sunday night.  I know this has been discussed before, but I don.t recall which it was. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 30, 2007, 10:56:41 AM
Does anyone recall the killing of a tourist in 1996 on Aruba? I can't seem to find this info, if we have discussed it before.

"Aruba stands confessed as a safe island in the Caribbean area. Per
year 1 up to 3 assassinations are on average committed. The last time
that a tourist by violence for living came were in 1996."
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21638481/Nederlander_vast_om_vermist_meisje_Aruba.html

From the Murder & Crime thread summary (see my sig line):

* * *
1996
???/??/1996 – U.S. female tourist was shot and murdered by two robbers while in ARUBA.
Posted 8/27/2006 at M&C by yapperz1, link to Free Republic



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 11:02:37 AM
Does anyone recall the killing of a tourist in 1996 on Aruba? I can't seem to find this info, if we have discussed it before.

"Aruba stands confessed as a safe island in the Caribbean area. Per
year 1 up to 3 assassinations are on average committed. The last time
that a tourist by violence for living came were in 1996."
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21638481/Nederlander_vast_om_vermist_meisje_Aruba.html

Wasn't that the year before Amy Bradley went missing?  I know she was not on Aruba, but wasn't there a mention of some crew members wanting to take her to CnC's during the stop in Aruba?

There was a woman from the U.S. that was mudered that year and that is the last one on Aruban records. Since then it appears they turned there backs or covered it up.

Correct,there was a couple of band members that were very persistent in taking her to C&C but she declined. She went missing the next morning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:30:36 AM
Good Morning!  Does anyone know if the Internet Cafe closed at 10 or 11PM on that Sunday night.  I know this has been discussed before, but I don.t recall which it was. TIA

(http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/8205/internetcafeix8.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 30, 2007, 11:33:44 AM
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/30/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/30/)

This is the article for the photo Hotshot posted previously on this page.

Quote
Un meneer di 66 aña di edad a fayece den porta di su cas
 
ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Diaranzon mainta ta drenta informe na central di polis, cu a haya un homber tira den mondi. Polis nan ser pidi pa bin na Willy’s Pool na Turibana, pa asina wordo notifica na unda exactamente e persona ta.

Na yegada di e Polis nan na Willy’s Pool, nan a wordo dirigi na un adres na Turibana 58, y ey nan bin haya un persona di edad respeta na suela dilanti su porta di cas, cu un DIARIO den su brasa.

Segun algun persona cu ta pasa laga yerba pe, nan a yega e mainta aki y bin topa cu e persona tira ey bao.

Mes ora nan a controla su pulso y tabata mustra cu e no ta duna señal di bida. Nan a yama polis mesora pa notifica nan di e sucedido aki.

Polis y recherche a presenta y despues TOD tambe a bin pa haci mas investigacion. Dr. Yagua a bin constata morto di e persona cu a resulta di ta Marco Adolpho Nagele, naci na corsow 30 di october 1931, y tin 66 aña di edad.

Online Pap translation:

one sir of 66 year of edad owing to fayece
in door of his cas


oranjestad (aan) --- diaranzon morning is enter informe at central of police, cu owing to achieve one man throw in forest. police they being ask for come at willy’s pool at turibana, for so wordo notifica at where exactly the person is.

at arrival of the police they at willy’s pool, they owing to wordo dirigi at one adres at turibana 58, y ey they come achieve one person of edad respeta at floor fast his door of cas, cu one daily paper in his arm.

according some person cu is happen let grass pe, they owing to arrive the morning here y come come across cu the person throw ey bao.

self hour they owing to controla his pulso y was show cu the do not give sign of life. they owing to calling police at once for notifica they of the sucedido here.

police y recherche owing to present y after tod also owing to come for haci more investigacion. dr. yagua owing to come constata dead of the person cu owing to resulta of is marco adolpho nagele, naci at corsow 30 of october 1931, y have 66 year of edad.

* * *

A familiar name … Canashito Farm Supply was robbed.

Quote
LADRONICIA COMETI NA CANASHITO FARM SUPPLY A
LAGA DOÑO MAN NA CABEZ

 
ORANJESTAD (AAN) – Diaranzon mainta, alarma a wordo bati na autoridad pa un ladronicia cu mester a tuma lugar den oranan di marduga na Canashito Farm Supply situa na Santa Cruz 20. akinan a propietario a yega y haya e mal noticia cu un kiebra a tuma lugar den su negoshi y cu a laga un daño y un ambiente amarga atras.

Polis cu a yega na e adres ya menciona, a bay tira un bista den e dam panoord di e negoshi, caminda un cash register cu ta pertenece na e establecimento a wordo laga atras tur kibra, mientras cu den e lugar mes, antisocialnan a bay cu un Computer di hopi importancia pa e negoshi, un Lap Top, un TV y un Tower di Computer.

Por a mira claramente cu e ladronnan a tuma nan tempo pa carga tur loke tabata tin mester hiba na e parti abou, kibra e lock di porta y hinca tur cos den un auto y move for di e lugar, lagando atras hopi daño na bentana kibra, porta kibra y un inseguridad completo pa e doño.

E bisiña a tende banda di 3 or di marduga con su cacho a bira loco ta blaf y a sali mesora pa bay wak kico por ta pasando ya cu un poco tempo atras ya caba ladronnan a horta su auto, pero no a nota nada particular y a bay drumi atrobe, luga e cacho tabata ladra pa e antisocialnan cu a drenta den Canashito Farm Supply. Ladronicia a aumenta drasticamente na Aruba y mester busca un forma pa frena e asunto aki prome cu morto cuminza cay.

Online Pap translation:

ladronicia cometi at canashito farm supply owing to
let owner hand at cabez


oranjestad (aan) – diaranzon morning, alarma owing to wordo beat at autoridad for one ladronicia cu have to did take lugar in oranan of marduga at canashito farm supply situa at santa cruz 20. akinan owing to propietario owing to arrive y achieve the bad news cu one kiebra did take lugar in his business y cu owing to let one damage y one ambiente amarga behind.

police cu owing to arrive at the adres already menciona, owing to bay throw one view in the dam panoord of the business, caminda one cash register cu is pertenece at the establecimento owing to wordo let behind all break, while cu in the lugar self, antisocialnan owing to bay cu one computer of much importancia for her business, one lap top, one tv y one tower of computer.

can owing to see claramente cu the ladronnan did take they time for carga all thing was have have to take away at the part downstairs, break the lock of door y hinca all cos in one car y actuate for of the lugar, lagando behind much damage at window break, door break y one inseguridad completo for her owner.

the neighbour owing to hear near of 3 or of marduga con his cacho owing to become loco is blaf y owing to leave at once for bay look at kico can is pasando already cu one some time behind already end ladronnan owing to steal his car, but not owing to notice nothing particular y owing to bay sleep again, luga the cacho was bark for her antisocialnan cu owing to enter in canashito farm supply. ladronicia owing to aumenta drasticamente at aruba y have to busca one form for frena the asunto here first cu dead cuminza cay.
* * *


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:34:34 AM
Does anyone recall the killing of a tourist in 1996 on Aruba? I can't seem to find this info, if we have discussed it before.

"Aruba stands confessed as a safe island in the Caribbean area. Per
year 1 up to 3 assassinations are on average committed. The last time
that a tourist by violence for living came were in 1996."
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/21638481/Nederlander_vast_om_vermist_meisje_Aruba.html

June 6, 2005 POSTED: 11:53 pm CDT
"They said they wanted to take her to a bar on Aruba that was called Carlos and Charlie's," said Bradley
Amy Bradley was last seen in her cabin at 5:15 a.m. By 6 a.m., she was nowhere to be found.

http://www.nbc13.com/news/4577219/detail.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 30, 2007, 11:42:31 AM
DANG! Is anyone else impressed? Someone has a question about when the Internet Cafe closed, and Kermit posted the actual sign on the door!  :shock: You guys are GOOD!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 11:49:19 AM
DANG! Is anyone else impressed? Someone has a question about when the Internet Cafe closed, and Kermit posted the actual sign on the door!  :shock: You guys are GOOD!!

I'm impressed that a frog knows how to use photobucket  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: MumInOhio on August 30, 2007, 11:52:57 AM
Thank You, Kermit.  10PM closing is in line with Satish' 5/31, 6/10 and 6/11 PVs.  Wonder why Deepak says 11PM.?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 30, 2007, 11:55:49 AM
Was reading Hammer's recent post in Theories thread and then started to look around.  Found some older posts on visitaruba guestbook, which I'm sure I read long ago....noticed that June 22, 2005 was last message, then it starts again in July and continues....some were deleted, I am sure.  Anyway, I found a Hammer posted there.

http://www.visitaruba.com/guestbook/guests2005.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 30, 2007, 12:05:32 PM
Was reading Hammer's recent post in Theories thread and then started to look around.  Found some older posts on visitaruba guestbook, which I'm sure I read long ago....noticed that June 22, 2005 was last message, then it starts again in July and continues....some were deleted, I am sure.  Anyway, I found a Hammer posted there.

http://www.visitaruba.com/guestbook/guests2005.html

also from this site was a post about the Allegro, which I thought was closed for renovation, but the post says only a portion was under construction....not sure how factual (also think he meant he was there 4/3/05):

ed
eddiejjohnson@aol.com
05 May 2005
19:29:30


yes allegro is remoleding on the 6&7 floor on the beach front all you can hear is jackhammering all day,i just got bach on 4/3/04 i'm not at all happy i call down there to see if there was any work going on they told me no. so if you going to allegro go to south tower side you will be ok


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 30, 2007, 12:11:25 PM
Was reading Hammer's recent post in Theories thread and then started to look around.  Found some older posts on visitaruba guestbook, which I'm sure I read long ago....noticed that June 22, 2005 was last message, then it starts again in July and continues....some were deleted, I am sure.  Anyway, I found a Hammer posted there.

http://www.visitaruba.com/guestbook/guests2005.html

also from this site was a post about the Allegro, which I thought was closed for renovation, but the post says only a portion was under construction....not sure how factual (also think he meant he was there 4/3/05):

ed
eddiejjohnson@aol.com
05 May 2005
19:29:30


yes allegro is remoleding on the 6&7 floor on the beach front all you can hear is jackhammering all day,i just got bach on 4/3/04 i'm not at all happy i call down there to see if there was any work going on they told me no. so if you going to allegro go to south tower side you will be ok



roflmfao, and you had expected an honest answer to that question?  look at these pictures of a beautiful bridge i'm having to sell to pay for my mother's hernia operation.
dammitdennis


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 30, 2007, 12:18:13 PM
Does anyone know if it's possible that if the KLPD is working with the FBI that in November they may concurrently close the case and immediately extradite the suspects to the U.S. for trial?

I read that this is possible under some treaty arrangement that makes this possible. Does anyone know?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 30, 2007, 12:39:17 PM
Was reading Hammer's recent post in Theories thread and then started to look around.  Found some older posts on visitaruba guestbook, which I'm sure I read long ago....noticed that June 22, 2005 was last message, then it starts again in July and continues....some were deleted, I am sure.  Anyway, I found a Hammer posted there.

http://www.visitaruba.com/guestbook/guests2005.html

also from this site was a post about the Allegro, which I thought was closed for renovation, but the post says only a portion was under construction....not sure how factual (also think he meant he was there 4/3/05):

ed
eddiejjohnson@aol.com
05 May 2005
19:29:30


yes allegro is remoleding on the 6&7 floor on the beach front all you can hear is jackhammering all day,i just got bach on 4/3/04 i'm not at all happy i call down there to see if there was any work going on they told me no. so if you going to allegro go to south tower side you will be ok



roflmfao, and you had expected an honest answer to that question?  look at these pictures of a beautiful bridge i'm having to sell to pay for my mother's hernia operation.
dammitdennis

I found this posted about the Allegro.  It was posted on June 5th, 2005.

<otherad...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> It could be that there is a connection between the 3 men and the
> security guards... maybe something happened on the beach and the guards
> helped them dispose of the body?  But that seems unnecessarily
> complicated.


> If there was no connection, maybe she wandered over to the other hotel
> to use their casino?  The Allegro was only a few minutes away and
> despite the renovations the casino was open.  It seems unlikely that
> she would have just been grabbed off the street in front of her hotel
> right after being dropped off.


> They said something on Fox about witnesses alerting police to
> suspicious activity at the Allegro after her disapperance, people
> coming and going even tho it was closed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 30, 2007, 12:52:49 PM
Does anyone know if it's possible that if the KLPD is working with the FBI that in November they may concurrently close the case and immediately extradite the suspects to the U.S. for trial?

I read that this is possible under some treaty arrangement that makes this possible. Does anyone know?

Frank -- Art Wood (or maybe Dave, referencing Art Wood) implied something about a treaty and it may be along these lines. It may even have been mentioned during an interview on SM/Dana radio.

It is on my long list of things to find and check out when I can. (Unless klaas or Dana remember what I am referring to and can point me to the statement)

Sorry I'm not more of a help.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 01:24:59 PM
C-Band Talk Network (Dana Pretzer)
Art Wood Part 2 Of Our Discussion On the Holloway case.
http://bruinfan.sasktelwebsite.net/
Saturday, July 8, 2006

PRE-SHOW Questions from Callers:
Caller #1- Where comment that blood in K2 vehicle came from - what is the proof? 

Caller #2- Ask about ATM redrawals that Paulus supposedly made?

Caller #3- When Jossy was on, he commented about a 7 year old boy at painted rocks area - did not add up as painting was a year ago - ask Art about the painted rock.

Caller #4- You are doing a great job, we appreciate what you are doing.

Caller #5- There was the letter asking that KJ and Dompig be replaced - what is the follow-up.  (Dana will ask Art's thoughts about Dompig leaving the police force).

Caller #6- Plastic bag in video #24 - does he know if it was retrieved and what the contencts were.

Caller #7- Asked abouth the 8 1/2 minute phone call between Joran and Deepak - could have that been a video transmission.

Interview:
Dana: Asked about comments on Dompigs' departure

Art:  Current chief is retiring, there is bitter feelings, some have let him down.  When Art was there to interview Carlos, there was word that Dompig was going to be fired.  So unknown if it is actually retirement or if he was fired.


Dana: Analyists with experience are flabergasted with lack of professionalism, etc. in investigation.

Art:  They have some fine police officers there, but thinks was sabatagoged from within, was done on purpose.  Look to who is remaining on the case to figure it out. 


Dana: is this a case where a fresh group of investigators could get some answers.

Art:  Evidence distroyed or misplaced or no longer can be obtained for the case .  Under Aruban law, you can't even talk to them, new LE could not re-interview without the prosecutor and judges agreeing.   If FBI could interview they could bring out a different resolve.  Once Aruba closes this case I believe the FBI has jurisdiction and can investigate. At least 5 involved in this case, it just takes one to talk.

Dana: When can FBI come in and investigate?

Art: US has treaty with all kinds of countries, share information.  Once case is closed, the FBI can conduct an investigation if there is a violation of the civil rights . Treaty requires that you share the evidence and allow access to the witnesses.  It would require the state department and attorney general to be condusive to require the FBI to conduct this investigation.

Dana: How difficult would it be for a fulltime private investigator like yourself or whoever to go there and work on this case in Aruba and  fulltime and take the evidence to the police department that is needed for an arrest and conviction

Art: Believes they have the right suspects, they were the last to be seen with Natalee.  Follow the lies and solve the crime.  A private investigator doesn't have access to the evidence.  What the Aruban authorities have is not going to be shared with a private investigator, I can tell you that. You can do this work from the internet as easily as in Aruba - it is all right there - the statements, etc. are all right there - the statements of these kids, the statements of witnesses .  Would really like the FBI to take a look at the case. Knows an FBI agent that threw his hands up at the interviews of one of these suspects by the lead investigator in this case, and that should tell you a lot .


Dana: What about the ATM witdrawal.

Art: There is absolutely no way to know if Paulus made a withdrawal or not.   On May 30, Paulus told Beth, Jug and friends (at least 5 people) that he picked up Joran at 4 am - Beth has this written in her diary. When his statement was transcribed it comes back as 10 pm the night of the 29th. Paulus's statement has always been that he and Joran went to poker tournament. He was losing at about 8 pm, turned his hand to Joran and went home. Joran called between 9:30 and 10:00 and Paulus picked up at McDonalds.  Beth has recorded all people, phone numbers, everything about the case.  All (Beth, Jug, friends hear 4 am).  Also at blackjack there is a player that looks like Paulus - that is totally contrary to every statement he has given. If it is him that is the first big lie that we know he has told.


Dana:  As lying by a witness is considered an obstruction, why didn't this dictate charges agains Joran and K2?

Art: It should have dictated charges - they lied and there is no reason to fabricate the lie unless they know what happened. Evidence involves the lies that they tell. If you've ever read the statements of these kids when they are in the back of the patrol car (June) They all know what happened to her.


Dana: Any proof of blood in the back of the Kalpoe vehicle.

Art: Somewhere around the 8th - 11th of June, one of the assistant chief's announced that blood had been found - samples were to be sent to Holland and to the FBI. Art has a friend in the police force who said there was blood found.  Blood in headliner and fabric, but report from Holland says chocolate and cleaning fluid. Unknown if FBI identified, but report said not blood. Don't know of any substances that show up as blood except a few where you can get a false reading (clorax bleach will give false reading in luminol test) . Police officer was told by forensics that there was blood in that car.  If listeners believe that there was a sabatago of the case from within, there are only a few that could have sabataged. Jan Van der Straaten was involved from the beginning, Beth wanted to see him from the time she got there. Ends up as Paulus' best friend, has said "how can I do this to my best friend's son"

One of the problems Art has with the case is the statments. All appear to be incomplete, all appear to take the focus off Joran.  Statements taken by Dennis Jacobs are incomplete.  Van der Straatten, Dennis Jabobs and possibly Dompig sabatoged.   Joran confessed June 9, transcriptions done June 13 incomplete.  It wasn't a professional investigation or witness statement, that is for sure. When Dave and Art were there in October they saw Van der Straatten meeting with Dennis Jacobs and Dompig - why as he was no longer involved in the case. They talked to police office (the pregnant one at desk job) and she indicated he comes in a couple of times a week.


Dana: Jossy, TES asked about the painted rocks. Visibility Team was painting supposedly because they found a 7 year old boy. What are the painted rocks about, and was that plastic bag ever analized

Art: Don't know, have looked at painted rocks and bag video. Also natural bridge area. A 7 year old child was found in the dunes, I believe was found prior to Natalee's disappearance. Person says he took video June 10-11 of 2005. Video could be critical piece of evidence. Have talked to Dave to talk to his FBI sources about this. Is about 50 yards from dunes where Art found the belt, also area where Dave say the police car on June 2 where they slammed the trunk without talking to him . Dave and Art met with the Prime  Minister and the assistant prosecutor who quit the case Analiss (?) Flanagan - they were impressed with her, but she quit the case. They met with her for hours late at night (she had the permission of the attorney general). They explained that they wanted the prosecution team replaced. She told them that she saw the testimony of Koen Gottenbos who she said concocted a story that he had a tennis match with Joran at the tennis club. Was found to be a lie, she wanted re-interviewed but police and KJ resisted him being re-interviewed.   Word by students was that they borrowed Koen family boat on May 30. Also had solid evidence from friends of the Gottenbos' , that Koen was ready to crack. He was afraid of being arrested, slept with mother as afraid.  They went to Dompig to try to get interviewed. Koen's father who got a lawyer and Koen was not interviewed.

Dana: Complicity from the top right accros the board - will heads ever roll?

Art: I kinda doubt it. Politically it is real difficult for Arubans to push for the truth as it will make their administration look bad, but they will have to live with it. If you have friends in high places in Aruba you can get things done (example of illegal work permits). Aruban citizenry deserves better than what they have. The police department deserves a better reputation than what the 3 police officers are giving them. If there are any Aruban citizens there that are listening, it must come from within. Talk to Bernadino who is retiring - he says he is dicgusted with the ways things are going - he knows a lot about why it failed.

Dana: Asked about the 8 1/2 minute cell call.

Art: Not sure the 4 am call ever happened. Knows that the cell phone records were never turned over to Beth, Dave or their attorneys. Art saw the cell log of Deepak, Satish and Joran of the night of May 30. Only 4-5 calls. Koen G has a little brother that was interviewed also - when they asked him about his cell phone he says it was stolen at school on May 29, 2005.


Dana: Data from Natalee's computer - was it ever analyized.

Art: Not that he is aware of. No laptop with her, shared computer with her mother and brother Matt. She had cell phone that she left in her room.  Joran accessed porn site (under his password anyway) at 4 am. He told police it takes him a case of beer to get tipsy. We are not talking about a cub scout here.


Dana: FBI agent in lobby of Holiday Inn?

Art: Not that he has heard. There have been a lot of rumors in inuendos.


Dana: Date rape drug by others?

Art: Girl as juvenile came forward and identified two others date raped by this group. Police took statements.  One girl told an acquaintence that she changed her statement (Sept 2005) after harassment by Dennis Jacobs. Art was to meet with the girl through her attorney on two occasions and she chickened out. Attorney representing the girl told Art she was date raped by Joran and his friends.


Dana: About bones being found. Any truth?

Art: A number of bones were turned in to police in Aruba. When followed up, they did not turn in bones to medical examiner. One LE took upon himself to take to clinic where Dr said was a donkey bone. Saw pic in Venzuela paper where reported to be a human bone with fingers attached, was sent to Caracus where they said was a manquein.  Jossy and Art are amazed as it was human.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 30, 2007, 01:36:20 PM
From Deepak's June 9th statement:

According to me Joran said to her that we were at the hotel. She got out. I had not seen this. I heard something fall. I heard Joran say in Papiamentu shit she has fallen down. Joran exited through the same car door as where she had fallen down to help her up. That was the right back door. I had seen the girl on the ground. I saw Joran help her. I saw that the girl turned around and pushed Joran into the car. I heard that she said something to Joran. I was unable to hear what she had said to Joran. The car radio had been turned down somewhat, the volume was maybe at the nine level or something like that. Joran looked surprised. She walked away from Joran. What I saw is that she was walking towards the lobby. I did not see her enter the lobby. I saw that she leaned against a pillar with one hand. Joran had gotten back into the car and was sitting behind Satish. In the lobby I saw a man walking up to the girl. I saw that he had a radio in his left hand. I assumed that he was talking into the radio because he held it closely in front of his mouth. It was a dark coloured man. He was fairly tall. He wore a black T-shirt and black pants.

Deepak in drivers seat,Satish in front passenger seat,Joran behind Satish on right of car,Natalee supposedly behind Deepak in left of car....did Natalee climb over big ole doofus Joran to exit from the right side of the car?
Also....for all of those from aol message boards who said Deepak did not ID a dark skinned man....he did.
:P


Deepak just goes into too much detail.  He even knows what the volume level of his car was on when Natalee pushed Joran.  In another statement we have Deepak saying when they left in the car he had the volume up loud and he could not hear what they were talking about but then he heard the word Hitler.  He then says he lowered the radio and he heard every word Natalee was saying which included the Hitler relation and her living on a plantation.  He must have good eyesight also because he saw Natalee on the floor.  I bet he did see Natalee on the floor because he was present when Joran beat her.

Deepak is FOS.  The volume on the radio was pumped up to the max so no one would hear Natalee's screams.  I hope Deepak and Satish have nightmares for the rest of their life for what they did.


I thought Satish made these claims? I could be wrong. Deepak has never claimed to have heard the so called hilter bs...I thought. But yes you are right, he is definitely full of it.
Some people pay attention to detail. Im sure he knew what he had the volume on. Its his thang. ;)

You are correct JustMeT it was Satish.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2083.msg274227#msg274227

Klaasend wrote:

More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother then drove on. We then drove by way of the city center towards the boulevard near where the Sonesta Hotel is. When we got close to the Sonesta Hotel he turned right and drove towards the hotels. When we got to the intersection west of Royal Plaza, we saw that the people where no longer standing at the intersection. We drove on in a westerly direction. We were driving on the boulevard where the gas station is when the girl said she wanted to go see the sharks in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Joran told the girl that there were no shark in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Then the girl said that the "lighthouse" was the only place on Aruba that she had not yet seen. The girl said that she wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then told my brother to drive to the "lighthouse" if the girl wanted to go and see the "lighthouse". My brother then drove towards the "lighthouse". While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler" (BS). I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation (more BS). Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: sharon on August 30, 2007, 01:53:49 PM
C-Band Talk Network (Dana Pretzer)
Art Wood Part 2 Of Our Discussion On the Holloway case.
http://bruinfan.sasktelwebsite.net/
Saturday, July 8, 2006



 :lol: :lol:

the galactic wizard strikes again  :cool:

there are not enough superlatives to describe you. Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 30, 2007, 02:30:33 PM

You are correct JustMeT it was Satish.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2083.msg274227#msg274227

Klaasend wrote:

More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother then drove on. We then drove by way of the city center towards the boulevard near where the Sonesta Hotel is. When we got close to the Sonesta Hotel he turned right and drove towards the hotels. When we got to the intersection west of Royal Plaza, we saw that the people where no longer standing at the intersection. We drove on in a westerly direction. We were driving on the boulevard where the gas station is when the girl said she wanted to go see the sharks in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Joran told the girl that there were no shark in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Then the girl said that the "lighthouse" was the only place on Aruba that she had not yet seen. The girl said that she wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then told my brother to drive to the "lighthouse" if the girl wanted to go and see the "lighthouse". My brother then drove towards the "lighthouse". While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler" (BS). I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation (more BS). Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.

DEEPAK 6/11/2005 STATEMENT and ADDENDUM (the same day)

To your question whether I can make detailed statements about the conversations that were happening while we were driving this route, I can say the following. I did hear some things. I heard the girl say something about sharks and “Lighthouse”. The comment she made about the videoclip. Joran had told me two days later that the girl had asked him whether me and my brother had been his slaves. The girl had told Joran that she was from Alabama, and that she didn't like people of dark colour and that they owned a farm and that the people working on their farm were all of dark colour.

To your question whether the girl had made racist comment to us, I can say the following. The girl made no comment like that to us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 02:57:19 PM
Not long ago we were in a discussion re: 5th suspect. Apparently Croes said PVDS was the 5th.

*In a statement, Croes called van der Sloot the fifth suspect in the disappearance of Holloway, who has been missing since March 31.

Van der Sloot's 17-year-old son and two of the boy's friends, brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 21, and Satish Kalpoe, 18, were seen drinking with Holloway at Carlos 'n Charlie's bar on the night she disappeared. All three young men are being held at the island's correctional facility. A fourth* suspect, Steve Gregory Croes, 26, a disc jockey on a party boat that docked near Holloway's hotel, was arrested last weekend.




http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-06-23-aruba_x.htm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on August 30, 2007, 03:34:20 PM

You are correct JustMeT it was Satish.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2083.msg274227#msg274227

Klaasend wrote:

More from Satish's June 11th Statement:

My brother then drove on. We then drove by way of the city center towards the boulevard near where the Sonesta Hotel is. When we got close to the Sonesta Hotel he turned right and drove towards the hotels. When we got to the intersection west of Royal Plaza, we saw that the people where no longer standing at the intersection. We drove on in a westerly direction. We were driving on the boulevard where the gas station is when the girl said she wanted to go see the sharks in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Joran told the girl that there were no shark in the vicinity of the "lighthouse". Then the girl said that the "lighthouse" was the only place on Aruba that she had not yet seen. The girl said that she wanted to see the "lighthouse". Joran then told my brother to drive to the "lighthouse" if the girl wanted to go and see the "lighthouse". My brother then drove towards the "lighthouse". While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler" (BS). I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation (more BS). Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.

DEEPAK 6/11/2005 STATEMENT and ADDENDUM (the same day)

To your question whether I can make detailed statements about the conversations that were happening while we were driving this route, I can say the following. I did hear some things. I heard the girl say something about sharks and “Lighthouse”. The comment she made about the videoclip. Joran had told me two days later that the girl had asked him whether me and my brother had been his slaves. The girl had told Joran that she was from Alabama, and that she didn't like people of dark colour and that they owned a farm and that the people working on their farm were all of dark colour.

To your question whether the girl had made racist comment to us, I can say the following. The girl made no comment like that to us.


Interesting to see these together...Satish heard alot and Deepak didn't, but Joran told him two days later (6/1/05, when Anita returned???).....Satish said he turned down the music, to hear more... :smt102 :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 30, 2007, 03:40:25 PM

Interesting to see these together...Satish heard alot and Deepak didn't, but Joran told him two days later (6/1/05, when Anita returned???).....Satish said he turned down the music, to hear more... :smt102 :2brickwall:

It's even more interesting if you look at what happened in Deepak's interview the day before:

DEEPAK - JUNE 10TH STATEMENT


To your question as to what more he had said, I can state the following. I do not remember.

(comment reporting officer: at this moment, I, BURKE, asked the suspect D.S. KALPOE as to how it is possible that yesterday he could make statements about stuff that took place a week ago and that he now is unable to remember a conversation from the day before yesterday. The suspect D.S. KALPOE stated that he cannot remember anything, that they had only talked about the people from the media and about the video they were watching).


To your question whether I had ever been in an accident with my car, I can state the following. I had an accident once. I was a rear end collision. I had suffered no injury. The accident happened approximately one month ago.

(Comment reporting officer: the suspect was given a moment to think after I, BURKE, had had a conversation with the suspect "off the record" regarding his age and that he should think of his family and also about his future. After a few minutes the interview was continued. The suspect was asked if he had thought about it, to this he answered that he had been thinking and that he wanted to talk to his attorney first and after that make a more detailed statement. The suspect was prepared to continue with this interview/interrogation. The suspect was also asked to take of his shirt to ascertain that there were no wounds visible on him. None could be seen).


To your question as to how it is possible that there are contradictions in the statements given by me, Satish and Joran, regarding where exactly we stopped in front of the lobby of the hotel, I can state the following. I don't know, I have stated the place where I know I brought the car to a full stop.


(Comment reporting officer: the suspect was informed to take a minute to really think, he requested 2 minutes to have a conversation with his attorney, after which he would make a detailed statement. His request was granted.

(comment reporting officer: after the suspect spoke with his attorney, he stated that he would make a detailed statement tomorrow and that he would read through this statement but that he would not sign it.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 04:21:47 PM
GVC I believe at CnC on August 25, 2007:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/GVCcnc082507.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Frank on August 30, 2007, 04:25:10 PM
klaas,

It pains me to see picture of these pukes. I don't like wishing violence on others but these people, I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 04:29:51 PM
I just want them to know we aren't forgetting. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 04:46:46 PM
We arent forgetting..Nice score on the Pic Klaas of GVC.. :cool:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting first day in the domain history..Dont you think??Whois Record for Mrpinkproductions.com ( Mr Pink Productions )

http://whois.domaintools.com/mrpinkproductions.com

Whois History: 24 records have been archived since 2005-05-30

MrPinkProductions
Email support@accountsupport.com
Phone +1 810 260 0055
Address 41627 Westmeath
Oranjestad., Aruba 11111
ARUBA 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 04:54:33 PM
We arent forgetting..Nice score on the Pic Klaas of GVC.. :cool:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting first day in the domain history..Dont you think??Whois Record for Mrpinkproductions.com ( Mr Pink Productions )

http://whois.domaintools.com/mrpinkproductions.com

Whois History: 24 records have been archived since 2005-05-30

Yep  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/MrPinkProductions.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 04:57:09 PM
******* - can you read what it says under the photo?  Does it say "join the Pink Patrol"?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 05:01:02 PM
We arent forgetting..Nice score on the Pic Klaas of GVC.. :cool:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting first day in the domain history..Dont you think??Whois Record for Mrpinkproductions.com ( Mr Pink Productions )

http://whois.domaintools.com/mrpinkproductions.com

Whois History: 24 records have been archived since 2005-05-30

Yep  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/MrPinkProductions.jpg)

Sooo.....................Why 5-30-05?? Why that particular day?? ANybody have a answer for this?? That the first day his server went up??



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 30, 2007, 05:02:44 PM
We arent forgetting..Nice score on the Pic Klaas of GVC.. :cool:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting first day in the domain history..Dont you think??Whois Record for Mrpinkproductions.com ( Mr Pink Productions )

http://whois.domaintools.com/mrpinkproductions.com

Whois History: 24 records have been archived since 2005-05-30

Yep  :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/MrPinkProductions.jpg)

Sooo.....................Why 5-30-05?? Why that particular day?? ANybody have a answer for this?? That the first day his server went up??



Would it be a good question to ask what server hosted the site before 05/30/05?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 05:03:36 PM
******* - can you read what it says under the photo?  Does it say "join the Pink Patrol"?

Yes it does.."Join the pink patrol and start earning $$$ today"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 05:08:36 PM

Sooo.....................Why 5-30-05?? Why that particular day?? ANybody have a answer for this?? That the first day his server went up??



Would it be a good question to ask what server hosted the site before 05/30/05?

I think that would be a great question to ask since that is the day Natalee went missing!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 05:12:05 PM
He probably never archived prior to May 30th.  Started archiving do to a certain video maybe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 05:19:33 PM
He probably never archived prior to May 30th.  Started archiving do to a certain video maybe?

Thats my guess..I guess its possible he took down another server and put this one up..And out of all the days 5-30-05 just blows my mind!!Wonder what day this guy fled Aruba?? Hopefully the FBI or ALE tracked what he was uploading on 5-30-05..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 05:46:40 PM
He probably never archived prior to May 30th.  Started archiving do to a certain video maybe?

Thats my guess..I guess its possible he took down another server and put this one up..And out of all the days 5-30-05 just blows my mind!!Wonder what day this guy fled Aruba?? Hopefully the FBI or ALE tracked what he was uploading on 5-30-05..

I clicked on one of the other links and got this:

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NETBLK-INTSRV.66.45.224.0/19
network:Auth-Area:66.45.224.0/19
network:Network-Name:INTSRV-66.45.238.32
network:IP-Network:66.45.238.32/27
network:Org-Name:jvds.com
network:Street-Address:P.O. Box 577
network:City:Franklin Lakes
network:State:NJ
network:Postal-Code:07417
network:Country-Code:US
network:Created:20040201
network:Updated:20050401

 :shock: :shock:

What does this mean??  Was Joran part of this site and changed it 05/30/2005....maybe at 4 am???   :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 05:50:12 PM
He probably never archived prior to May 30th.  Started archiving do to a certain video maybe?

Thats my guess..I guess its possible he took down another server and put this one up..And out of all the days 5-30-05 just blows my mind!!Wonder what day this guy fled Aruba?? Hopefully the FBI or ALE tracked what he was uploading on 5-30-05..

I clicked on one of the other links and got this:

network:Class-Name:network
network:ID:NETBLK-INTSRV.66.45.224.0/19
network:Auth-Area:66.45.224.0/19
network:Network-Name:INTSRV-66.45.238.32
network:IP-Network:66.45.238.32/27
network:Org-Name:jvds.com
network:Street-Address:P.O. Box 577
network:City:Franklin Lakes
network:State:NJ
network:Postal-Code:07417
network:Country-Code:US
network:Created:20040201
network:Updated:20050401

 :shock: :shock:

What does this mean??  Was Joran part of this site and changed it 05/30/2005....maybe at 4 am???   :shock:


Nope

http://web.archive.org/web/20031223182209/http://www.jvds.com/

Just Virtual Dedicated Servers

JVDS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 05:52:06 PM
Dang....did they purposely change that name??  I thought we had a real connection.   :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 05:55:20 PM
Dang....did they purposely change that name??  I thought we had a real connection.   :roll:

LOL - no, it's a current up and running site:

http://www.jvds.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 06:03:53 PM
Dang....did they purposely change that name??  I thought we had a real connection.   :roll:

LOL - no, it's a current up and running site:

http://www.jvds.com/

I understand.  How coincidental is that??  Could someone be hosting that server for him or is it too big??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 30, 2007, 06:09:47 PM
Info I saved from 2005 when we were trying to determine the significance, if any, to the dates:


MrPinkProductions.com Whois History
(*) denotes significant change in whois record

2005-08-06
2005-07-07
2005-06-28
2005-05-30
Displaying 4 records

Since 2002, FOUR significant changes in registration since May 30, including one today (8-6-05)
Original site registration:
Creation date: 04 Sep 2002 22:34:22
Expiration date: 04 Sep 2005 22:34:49



Timeline Notes:
05-30-2005
speaks for itself

06-28-2005
6-26-05 PVDS released, TES arrives in Aruba
6-27-05 Steve Croes released; JVDS/K2 retained in custody
6-28-05 Anita/PVDS granted visiting rights re JVDS

In response to AP inquiry as to why PVDS was released, van der Straaten said "At this moment I don't know why".

07-07-2005
7-1-05 Jug Twitty/MSNBC:"....if they let them walk we can share it & it will be devastating. The UNITED STATES & the world will be amazed".
7-4-05 hearing: K2 released; JVDS retained/60 days. No monitoring of JVDS' visits.
7-5-05 Jug Twitty/Fox:"....we know a lot now that we can't say. But at that time, the world will be absolutely shocked at what we know now. And that's why it was so devastating yesterday when they let those two boys go."

08-06-2005
7-24-05 the gardener/pond witness
7-28-05 landfill witness
8-4-05 Beth shares details from a tourist's April 2005 encounter w/ JVDS
8-5-05 aware of media coverage/SM chit chat???
TJ Ward goes on Fox's Hannity and Colmes and states that FBI is looking into Mr. Pink.
_________________

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 06:14:48 PM
Dang....did they purposely change that name??  I thought we had a real connection.   :roll:

LOL - no, it's a current up and running site:

http://www.jvds.com/

I understand.  How coincidental is that??  Could someone be hosting that server for him or is it too big??


Registrant:
 JVDS
 100 Delawanna Ave
 Clifton, NJ 07014
 US

 Domain name: JVDS.COM

 Administrative Contact:
    Registration, JVDS  jason@fortressitx.com
    100 Delawanna Ave
    Clifton, NJ 07014
    US
    973-572-1070
 Technical Contact:
    Registration, JVDS  jason@fortressitx.com
    100 Delawanna Ave
    Clifton, NJ 07014
    US
    973-572-1070


 Registration Service Provider:
    FortressITX, reg@pwebtech.com
    973-572-1070
    http://www.fortressitx.com
    This company may be contacted for domain login/passwords,
    DNS/Nameserver changes, and general domain support questions.


 Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.
 Record last updated on 30-Oct-2005.
 Record expires on 11-Jul-2011.
 Record created on 11-Jul-2003.

 Domain servers in listed order:
    NS1.65535.NET   
    NS2.65535.NET   
    NS3.65535.NET   
http://www.checkdomain.com/cgi-bin/checkdomain.pl?domain=jvds.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 06:19:21 PM
Well, those initials should not be useable.  Skeeeerd me.  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 06:24:34 PM
8-5-05 NY Daily news puts out article about police looking into porn producer that may be linked to Natalees dissapearance.
8-9-05 FBI subpoenas Mr.Pinks cell phone records..

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/PaulBroughSprintsubpoena.jpg)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe JVDS.com is completely unrelated..

Contact Info Owner Jvds
Email jason@fortressitx.com
Phone +1 973 572 1070
Address 100 Delawanna Ave
Clifton, NJ  07014
US 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 06:26:41 PM
DANG! Is anyone else impressed? Someone has a question about when the Internet Cafe closed, and Kermit posted the actual sign on the door!  :shock: You guys are GOOD!!

heh heh - monkey love


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 06:27:24 PM
DANG! Is anyone else impressed? Someone has a question about when the Internet Cafe closed, and Kermit posted the actual sign on the door!  :shock: You guys are GOOD!!

I'm impressed that a frog knows how to use photobucket  :lol:

LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 30, 2007, 06:29:46 PM
I just want them to know we aren't forgetting. 

I totally agree! We shall not allow them any privacy or peace until the REAL TRUTH is told and Natalee is brought home. When Natalee and her family have peace...then so shall they. WE WILL NOT STOP!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 06:33:02 PM
[quote author=*******

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe JVDS.com is completely unrelated..

Contact Info Owner Jvds
Email jason@fortressitx.com
Phone +1 973 572 1070
Address 100 Delawanna Ave
Clifton, NJ  07014
US 
 
[/quote]

I agree......but it did get my attention... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 06:35:06 PM
Does anyone know if it's possible that if the KLPD is working with the FBI that in November they may concurrently close the case and immediately extradite the suspects to the U.S. for trial?

I read that this is possible under some treaty arrangement that makes this possible. Does anyone know?

The President, acting through the Attorney General, has the inherent constitutional authority to deploy the FBI to investigate and arrest individuals for violating United States law, even if those actions contravene customary international law.

Thus, Executive agents, when appropriately directed pursuant to the President's constitutional law enforcement authority, may lawfully carry on investigations and make arrests that contravene customary international law.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 06:37:16 PM
I am curious what these two people know about Mr.Pink?? Also why clevfan says he is friends with Lorenzo??

http://hcgtv.net/viewtopic.php?id=1110&p=9

2005-06-19 1:58 am
CHAPPAQUIDICKINARUBA
Guest Re: Joran Van Der Sloot, house searchedI know this isn't a porn site hcgtv, but I thought this was relevent...

http://www.guide2paradise.com/

Quote
#220 2005-06-19 2:15 am
dori
Guest Re: Joran Van Der Sloot, house searched someone from another blog brought up some interesting info to think about-

This aruban sex site is linked to the paypal account of someone referred to as:

paul_brough@hotmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Majorwager.com

clevfan
Staff
   
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 17,984
07-03-2005, 03:30 AM
 RE:Anyone else following this Natalee Holloway case?
these are suspect sites:

www.mrpinkproductions.com

www.guide2paradise.com


both are run by a guy orginally from michigan by the name of paul brough. he is good friends with lorenzo van rijn

old sites are: www.getlegalhookers.com and www.metronightlife.com
RE:Anyone else following this Natalee Holloway case?
What is kinda funny about this guy is that he is a guy from the Detroit area who's name is Paul Brough, he winters in Aruba and runs the local "let's go redwings" chapter there.
He has an escort service down in aruba and was stupid enough to have a few websites down there... www.mrpinkproductions.com and www.guide2paridise.com which used to be www.getlegalhookers.com

Now he is in a heap of trouble down there by the authorities due to this case, even if he isn't involved in it, he's is now cooked bigtime, LOL




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 06:41:38 PM

Is this Natalee?
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6793/93226975p7564417169oq7.jpg)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 06:48:41 PM

Is this Natalee?
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6793/93226975p7564417169oq7.jpg)




IMO - no, it's not Natalee.  The top is different and this girl looks too tall:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/notnatalee.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 06:49:05 PM

Is this Natalee?
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6793/93226975p7564417169oq7.jpg)




Hmmmmm...hair seems a little thin (the pony tail doesn't look poofy) and maybe too blonde???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 06:50:47 PM
Blow up looks like it's ties down back and not a pony tail...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 30, 2007, 06:59:38 PM
Blow up looks like it's ties down back and not a pony tail...

I think this girl's hair is in a little bun or topknot. The shirt appears to be a haltar style that ties at the neck in the back, but I thought I remembered Natalee's shirt to have teal and white stripes and a pattern at the top. This shirt appears to be solid teal (but I don't know if I've ever seen the back of the shirt she Natalee was wearing).

I'm not sure if the guy is Joran, either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 07:00:30 PM
Blow up looks like it's ties down back and not a pony tail...

I think this girl's hair is in a little bun or topknot. The shirt appears to be a haltar style that ties at the neck in the back, but I thought I remembered Natalee's shirt to have teal and white stripes and a pattern at the top. This shirt appears to be solid teal (but I don't know if I've ever seen the back of the shirt she Natalee was wearing).

I'm not sure if the guy is Joran, either.

IMO it's not Joran or Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 30, 2007, 07:06:00 PM
8-5-05 NY Daily news puts out article about police looking into porn producer that may be linked to Natalees dissapearance.
8-9-05 FBI subpoenas Mr.Pinks cell phone records..

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/PaulBroughSprintsubpoena.jpg)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe JVDS.com is completely unrelated..

Contact Info Owner Jvds
Email jason@fortressitx.com
Phone +1 973 572 1070
Address 100 Delawanna Ave
Clifton, NJ  07014
US 
 

that 586 number is a michigan number.  Would be the northern suburbs of detroit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 07:09:45 PM

Is this Natalee?
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6793/93226975p7564417169oq7.jpg)




IMO - no, it's not Natalee.  The top is different and this girl looks too tall:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/notnatalee.jpg)

Didn't the MB kids go to CnC's more then once?
So Natalee would be wearing a different top (one would hope)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 07:13:06 PM
Kermit - yes they did go more than once.  I still don't think it's Natalee though unless that guy is really short.  That girl looks much taller in stature than Natalee to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 30, 2007, 07:13:07 PM
8-5-05 NY Daily news puts out article about police looking into porn producer that may be linked to Natalees dissapearance.
8-9-05 FBI subpoenas Mr.Pinks cell phone records..

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/PaulBroughSprintsubpoena.jpg)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe JVDS.com is completely unrelated..

Contact Info Owner Jvds
Email jason@fortressitx.com
Phone +1 973 572 1070
Address 100 Delawanna Ave
Clifton, NJ  07014
US 
 

that 586 number is a michigan number.  Would be the northern suburbs of detroit.

Exchange 586-610
Exchange 586-610 Details
NPA/Area Code: 586 NXX Use Type: 
NXX/Exchange: 610 NXX Intro Version: 2003-02-09
City: MOUNT CLEMENS New NPA: 
State: MI Latitude: 42.59
County: MACOMB Longitude: -82.88
County Population: 788 LATA: 340
ZIP Code: 48043 Overlay: 0
ZIP Code Count: 0 Rate Center: MT CLEMENS
ZIP Code Freq: -1 Switch CLLI: DTRTMIPMCM0
FIPS: 26099245400 OCN: 6664
Observes DST: Yes Company: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Time Zone: Eastern (GMT -05:00) MSA/CBSA Code: 19820
    MSA/CBSA Name: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 30, 2007, 07:18:42 PM
8-5-05 NY Daily news puts out article about police looking into porn producer that may be linked to Natalees dissapearance.
8-9-05 FBI subpoenas Mr.Pinks cell phone records..

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/PaulBroughSprintsubpoena.jpg)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe JVDS.com is completely unrelated..

Contact Info Owner Jvds
Email jason@fortressitx.com
Phone +1 973 572 1070
Address 100 Delawanna Ave
Clifton, NJ  07014
US 
 

that 586 number is a michigan number.  Would be the northern suburbs of detroit.

Exchange 586-610
Exchange 586-610 Details
NPA/Area Code: 586 NXX Use Type: 
NXX/Exchange: 610 NXX Intro Version: 2003-02-09
City: MOUNT CLEMENS New NPA: 
State: MI Latitude: 42.59
County: MACOMB Longitude: -82.88
County Population: 788 LATA: 340
ZIP Code: 48043 Overlay: 0
ZIP Code Count: 0 Rate Center: MT CLEMENS
ZIP Code Freq: -1 Switch CLLI: DTRTMIPMCM0
FIPS: 26099245400 OCN: 6664
Observes DST: Yes Company: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
Time Zone: Eastern (GMT -05:00) MSA/CBSA Code: 19820
    MSA/CBSA Name: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI


Mt Clemens is a north east suburb of detroit and is my old stomping grounds.

Its a good hour to hour and a half from brighton where I thought I heard paul was from?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Blue Moon on August 30, 2007, 07:26:55 PM
Hi all.  IT IS RAINING.  First time since 6/20/07.  I am going to go set in the rain! :P
Has anyone read over this aruba forum?  I find it interesting the comments of people from the States.  Disgusting.

http://www.aruba.com/forum/search.php?searchid=44493


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 07:28:25 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 07:30:24 PM
Hi all.  IT IS RAINING.  First time since 6/20/07.  I am going to go set in the rain! :P
Has anyone read over this aruba forum?  I find it interesting the comments of people from the States.  Disgusting.

http://www.aruba.com/forum/search.php?searchid=44493

Rain is so nice when really needed.  I have read that site.  I believe they selectively have removed many early posts.  I'm sure you will find that surprising.  :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Buckeye on August 30, 2007, 07:32:47 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED

 :shock: :shock:

If innocent, you would think they would have provided the disclosure, even having been granted confidentiality.  Must be more important than 800 million to keep some info under wraps. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 07:35:55 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED
Kalpoe v Phil?   TIA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 07:38:26 PM
No..He is not from Brighton..

(Office or Apt)
Paul M Brough
5300 Mall Dr W
Lansing, MI 48917

(Home address)
PAUL M BROUGH
41627 WESTMEATH CIR   
PAUL M BROUGH
CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 30, 2007, 07:43:19 PM
No..He is not from Brighton..

(Office or Apt)
Paul M Brough
5300 Mall Dr W
Lansing, MI 48917

(Home address)
PAUL M BROUGH
41627 WESTMEATH CIR   
PAUL M BROUGH
CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI

hmm, i wonder why I had brighton on the brain  :lol: :lol:

Clinton Township is right next to Mt Clemens and Lansing is about 2 hours west of there, i live about half way between the 2



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 07:47:03 PM
Brighton I believe is where Max De Vries was from before he dissapeared in Aruba..Its a nice little town I have been there myself :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 07:52:41 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED

Was this the lawsuit Kapoe vs. Holloway/Twitty's?? Tell us that don't know law what this means, Please. TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 30, 2007, 07:53:17 PM
Brighton I believe is where Max De Vries was from before he dissapeared in Aruba..Its a nice little town I have been there myself :wink:

yep, Max was from Brighton and some of his family still is. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 07:54:22 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED

Was this the lawsuit Kapoe vs. Holloway/Twitty's?? Tell us that don't know law what this means, Please. TIA
Bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 07:56:32 PM
Ooops-meant Kalpoes vs. Dr.Phil


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 07:59:43 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED

Was this the lawsuit Kapoe vs. Holloway/Twitty's?? Tell us that don't know law what this means, Please. TIA

My take:
It means the Kalpoes will not be getting 800 million dollars and someone probably spent alot of money on lawyers for nothing....Also means Natalee's Family will not be getting any new discoveries/Info..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 08:03:32 PM
Being it was an FBI subpoena for MrPinks cell records...would that make it definitive it was for calls *in the U.S*?

Maybe a call from the U.S. to Aruba?  A cell / satellite phone contract from a U.S. company that was Aruba capable?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:08:35 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED
Kalpoe v Phil?   TIA!

DISMISSED?  OMG!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 08:10:23 PM
Maybe Kermit was in the courtroom? I know L.A. is lax on dogs in restaurants, but frogs in court?  :idea:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 08:13:09 PM
Being it was an FBI subpoena for MrPinks cell records...would that make it definitive it was for calls *in the U.S*?

Maybe a call from the U.S. to Aruba?  A cell / satellite phone contract from a U.S. company that was Aruba capable?

My guess is the ALE had asked the FBI for the Info and it was calls that he made/received in Aruba..He had a sprint phone with a michigan number and he took off from Aruba back to FLA or Mich after Natalee dissapeared..That phone he had is on the same network they used in Aruba..He may have just had to change the chip but kept the same number..That is quite a cooincidence that Mrpinkproductions.com server was started on 5-30-05.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Maria on August 30, 2007, 08:14:47 PM
Hello Everyone,

My name is Maria and I joined today.  I am very happy to be here.  I have been reading here for 2+ years.  This was the first opportunity to join.  I feel as if I know all of you from reading so long but wanted to give you some  info on my background.

I am a female computer programmer and I live in NJ.  I have been following the case from the beginning.  I think PVDS and the other 3 are guilty as hell among others on the island.  I live with my "significant other" and he feels I spend too much time on this website.  BUT, any items that were reported in the news were here first.  I hope my opinion can provide some value here.

Also I am NO WAY a troll.  All I want is for Natalee's family to find justice. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:15:13 PM
Being it was an FBI subpoena for MrPinks cell records...would that make it definitive it was for calls *in the U.S*?

Maybe a call from the U.S. to Aruba?  A cell / satellite phone contract from a U.S. company that was Aruba capable?

My guess is the ALE had asked the FBI for the Info and it was calls that he made/received in Aruba..He had a sprint phone with a michigan number and he took off from Aruba back to FLA or Mich after Natalee dissapeared..That phone he had is on the same network they used in Aruba..He may have just had to change the chip but kept the same number..That is quite a cooincidence that Mrpinkproductions.com server was started on 5-30-05.

Was it started on May 30, 2005 or was it first archived then?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 08:15:19 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED

Was this the lawsuit Kapoe vs. Holloway/Twitty's?? Tell us that don't know law what this means, Please. TIA

My take:
It means the Kalpoes will not be getting 800 million dollars and someone probably spent alot of money on lawyers for nothing....Also means Natalee's Family will not be getting any new discoveries/Info..


WooHoo...that's good news!!! :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 30, 2007, 08:16:39 PM
Being it was an FBI subpoena for MrPinks cell records...would that make it definitive it was for calls *in the U.S*?

Maybe a call from the U.S. to Aruba?  A cell / satellite phone contract from a U.S. company that was Aruba capable?

My guess is the ALE had asked the FBI for the Info and it was calls that he made/received in Aruba..He had a sprint phone with a michigan number and he took off from Aruba back to FLA or Mich after Natalee dissapeared..That phone he had is on the same network they used in Aruba..He may have just had to change the chip but kept the same number..That is quite a cooincidence that Mrpinkproductions.com server was started on 5-30-05.

Was it started on May 30, 2005 or was it first archived then?

Creation date: 04 Sep 2002 22:34:22


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:18:12 PM
Being it was an FBI subpoena for MrPinks cell records...would that make it definitive it was for calls *in the U.S*?

Maybe a call from the U.S. to Aruba?  A cell / satellite phone contract from a U.S. company that was Aruba capable?

My guess is the ALE had asked the FBI for the Info and it was calls that he made/received in Aruba..He had a sprint phone with a michigan number and he took off from Aruba back to FLA or Mich after Natalee dissapeared..That phone he had is on the same network they used in Aruba..He may have just had to change the chip but kept the same number..That is quite a cooincidence that Mrpinkproductions.com server was started on 5-30-05.

Was it started on May 30, 2005 or was it first archived then?

Creation date: 04 Sep 2002 22:34:22

Thanks VMS - see I find the archive date of May 30, 2005 very suspicious.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 30, 2007, 08:18:47 PM
Hello Everyone,

My name is Maria and I joined today.  I am very happy to be here.  I have been reading here for 2+ years.  This was the first opportunity to join.  I feel as if I know all of you from reading so long but wanted to give you some  info on my background.

I am a female computer programmer and I live in NJ.  I have been following the case from the beginning.  I think PVDS and the other 3 are guilty as hell among others on the island.  I live with my "significant other" and he feels I spend too much time on this website.  BUT, any items that were reported in the news were here first.  I hope my opinion can provide some value here.

Also I am NO WAY a troll.  All I want is for Natalee's family to find justice. 
Hi Maria.  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 08:19:53 PM
Sorry, that's not good news if Beth and Dave never see any evidense if there is still some to be found. I hope there is something there though that a few others may not know and maybe it's been kept in safe keeping.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 08:20:06 PM
Thanks *******! That makes sense. And that 5/30 date is too coincidental > for info storage? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:21:08 PM
Hello Everyone,

My name is Maria and I joined today.  I am very happy to be here.  I have been reading here for 2+ years.  This was the first opportunity to join.  I feel as if I know all of you from reading so long but wanted to give you some  info on my background.

I am a female computer programmer and I live in NJ.  I have been following the case from the beginning.  I think PVDS and the other 3 are guilty as hell among others on the island.  I live with my "significant other" and he feels I spend too much time on this website.  BUT, any items that were reported in the news were here first.  I hope my opinion can provide some value here.

Also I am NO WAY a troll.  All I want is for Natalee's family to find justice. 

Welcome Maria!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:22:28 PM
Sorry, that's not good news if Beth and Dave never see any evidense if there is still some to be found. I hope there is something there though that a few others may not know and maybe it's been kept in safe keeping.

The good news is that those dirt bag Kalpoes won't be getting any money.  If the case is closed they may be able to get the evidence.  I posted what Art Woods said about it a few pages back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 30, 2007, 08:22:47 PM
Hello Everyone,

My name is Maria and I joined today.  I am very happy to be here.  I have been reading here for 2+ years.  This was the first opportunity to join.  I feel as if I know all of you from reading so long but wanted to give you some  info on my background.

I am a female computer programmer and I live in NJ.  I have been following the case from the beginning.  I think PVDS and the other 3 are guilty as hell among others on the island.  I live with my "significant other" and he feels I spend too much time on this website.  BUT, any items that were reported in the news were here first.  I hope my opinion can provide some value here.

Also I am NO WAY a troll.  All I want is for Natalee's family to find justice. 

Welcome Maria!! Look forward to hearing your thoughts!! Since Natalee dissapeared on 5-30-05..What do you think of this??

Whois Record for Mrpinkproductions.com ( Mr Pink Productions )

http://whois.domaintools.com/mrpinkproductions.com


Whois History: 24 records have been archived since 2005-05-30

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa118/Observer00000007/MrPinkProductions.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 30, 2007, 08:23:05 PM
Being it was an FBI subpoena for MrPinks cell records...would that make it definitive it was for calls *in the U.S*?

Maybe a call from the U.S. to Aruba?  A cell / satellite phone contract from a U.S. company that was Aruba capable?

My guess is the ALE had asked the FBI for the Info and it was calls that he made/received in Aruba..He had a sprint phone with a michigan number and he took off from Aruba back to FLA or Mich after Natalee dissapeared..That phone he had is on the same network they used in Aruba..He may have just had to change the chip but kept the same number..That is quite a cooincidence that Mrpinkproductions.com server was started on 5-30-05.

Was it started on May 30, 2005 or was it first archived then?

Creation date: 04 Sep 2002 22:34:22

Thanks VMS - see I find the archive date of May 30, 2005 very suspicious.
He is interesting to say the least...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: San on August 30, 2007, 08:25:22 PM
Hello Everyone,

My name is Maria and I joined today.  I am very happy to be here.  I have been reading here for 2+ years.  This was the first opportunity to join.  I feel as if I know all of you from reading so long but wanted to give you some  info on my background.

I am a female computer programmer and I live in NJ.  I have been following the case from the beginning.  I think PVDS and the other 3 are guilty as hell among others on the island.  I live with my "significant other" and he feels I spend too much time on this website.  BUT, any items that were reported in the news were here first.  I hope my opinion can provide some value here.

Also I am NO WAY a troll.  All I want is for Natalee's family to find justice. 

Welcome Maria.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 30, 2007, 08:28:09 PM
Welcome, Maria--my H makes fun of me when I'm on here for too long, too...but it's nothing compared to his addiction to the Kentucky sports message boards!

Glad you're able to post after all this time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:30:26 PM
KERMIT - Please come back and tell me how you know the case has been DISMISSED. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 08:31:14 PM
The hearing today was motion to compel / motion to dismiss Skeeters as defendant. Case dismissal would be somewhat of a surprise. IMO. Kermit sounded pretty definitive though, so i am a believer.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 08:31:35 PM
Welcome Maria


Hi iggy, vms, Klaas, ******* and anyone else I missed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: BlueKYGirl on August 30, 2007, 08:32:58 PM
The hearing today was motion to compel / motion to dismiss Skeeters as defendant. Case dismissal would be somewhat of a surprise. IMO. Kermit sounded pretty definitive though, so i am a believer.



It was in bold...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: vms on August 30, 2007, 08:38:26 PM
Welcome Maria


Hi iggy, vms, Klaas, ******* and anyone else I missed.

Hi greeneyedlady.  :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: IndyDan on August 30, 2007, 08:46:08 PM
LAWSUIT IN LOS ANGELES IS DISMISSED

Was this the lawsuit Kapoe vs. Holloway/Twitty's?? Tell us that don't know law what this means, Please. TIA

My take:
It means the Kalpoes will not be getting 800 million dollars and someone probably spent alot of money on lawyers for nothing....Also means Natalee's Family will not be getting any new discoveries/Info..


Your take is my take as well - only to add that the Family won't be losing much with no new Discovery, they pretty much know all there is to know.  Although it might have been nice to ask a few questions. 
The bigger end is that the Kalpoes are once again relegated to the subhuman scum they've always been.  Scum breeds scum.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 08:58:56 PM
OK - where did that frog go?  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Maria on August 30, 2007, 08:59:59 PM
Thank you everyone for the warm welcome.  I really think the crime was at VDS house and aruba is corrupt.  In the first stages I did not see JVDS or Kalpos looking for her.  People on the island were and others vacationing but not them.  Leads me to believe they were guilty from the start.  If I was innocent I would have looked for Natalee and did everything to clear my name.

Then I agree the coverup starts.  I tend to agree with Anna "Dig up the pool".  She could be at  sea but that would require calculations from the VDS group(not washing ashore) and I really don't think they are that smart.  I could be wrong though.  Just my opinion. 

I made sure everyone I worked with did not go to Aruba.  And does not go.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: blah on August 30, 2007, 09:03:04 PM
OK - where did that frog go?  :lol:

(http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g213/woodchuck123/thKermit.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 09:09:15 PM
I just checked the LA Superior Court website and the documents from todays hearing have not been filed yet.  I'll check back later. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on August 30, 2007, 09:14:48 PM
Welcome, Maria!

It is nice to have another Natalee supporter join us.

My husband also is baffled by how much time I spend on the blogs!
However, he accepts it and has a lot of compassion for Natalee.

Since you live in NJ, I would like to mention that there will be an awareness campaign for Natalee in Atlantic City at the end of October. So far, there have been campaigns
in Boston, Miami, and New Orleans.

If you would like to stand up for Natalee and remind others that she deserves justice,
please check out the travel show thread. Info and e-mail contact listed there.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 30, 2007, 09:19:22 PM
OK - where did that frog go?  :lol:


uh-oh, the toad's missing too.  this could be bad news for somebody.
dammitdennis


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 09:41:36 PM
Ok, I wasn't going to say anything but I really enjoy Frog Legs.  I have refrained from ordering them out of respect for Kermit and GrannyToad but if Kermit doesn't get back here and give us more info, I'm going back to my old ways. :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Maria on August 30, 2007, 09:49:29 PM
Even though I am a computer programmer I am still new to posting on blog sites.  If I make an incorrect post please excuse me.  I think Grande did an excellent job with the excel spreadsheet.  I guess I also wonder why they interview everyone under the sun and they don't follow up.  I guess it's aruba and that's how to explain it.  And to top it off the questions that they ask require follow up and they just don't do it.

And they must have had a reason to ask the questions initially or else why ask?

I really like the new website and spell check.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 09:50:47 PM
Ok, I wasn't going to say anything but I really enjoy Frog Legs.  I have refrained from ordering them out of respect for Kermit and GrannyToad but if Kermit doesn't get back here and give us more info, I'm going back to my old ways. :lol:

 :lol:  I'm in, Cajun style for me. You hearing this Kermie?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 09:52:20 PM
Even though I am a computer programmer I am still new to posting on blog sites.  If I make an incorrect post please excuse me.  I think Grande did an excellent job with the excel spreadsheet.  I guess I also wonder why they interview everyone under the sun and they don't follow up.  I guess it's aruba and that's how to explain it.  And to top it off the questions that they ask require follow up and they just don't do it.

And they must have had a reason to ask the questions initially or else why ask?

I really like the new website and spell check.

There are lot's of PV's we haven't seen, so we can't really say if they didn't follow up.  That said, they were only going through the motions.  IMO, they know what happened and have been covering it up and protecting the guilty parties since at least June 1, 2005.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Maria on August 30, 2007, 09:57:13 PM
Welcome, Maria!

It is nice to have another Natalee supporter join us.

My husband also is baffled by how much time I spend on the blogs!
However, he accepts it and has a lot of compassion for Natalee.

Since you live in NJ, I would like to mention that there will be an awareness campaign for Natalee in Atlantic City at the end of October. So far, there have been campaigns
in Boston, Miami, and New Orleans.

If you would like to stand up for Natalee and remind others that she deserves justice,
please check out the travel show thread. Info and e-mail contact listed there.




I am there.  I will be on vacation various times in Sept but in the office in Oct.  ANything I can do to help I will do.  We do have a major IT project to be released in Nov/Dec but anything after that I can do.  My work is getting crazy now.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Maria on August 30, 2007, 09:59:08 PM
Even though I am a computer programmer I am still new to posting on blog sites.  If I make an incorrect post please excuse me.  I think Grande did an excellent job with the excel spreadsheet.  I guess I also wonder why they interview everyone under the sun and they don't follow up.  I guess it's aruba and that's how to explain it.  And to top it off the questions that they ask require follow up and they just don't do it.

And they must have had a reason to ask the questions initially or else why ask?

I really like the new website and spell check.

There are lot's of PV's we haven't seen, so we can't really say if they didn't follow up.  That said, they were only going through the motions.  IMO, they know what happened and have been covering it up and protecting the guilty parties since at least June 1, 2005.

I agree 100%


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 30, 2007, 10:06:32 PM
Stand Up for Natalee:
Travel/Tourism Trade Shows Coming Up!


Chicago - September 25 - 27 (this is in the middle of the week; so far no one has been able to volunteer)

Atlantic City - October 30, 31

King of Prussia PA - November 17, 18

Ft Lauderdale - November 17, 18

Luxury Travel Show in Vegas - December 4 - 6.

Tourism/Travel Show thread, current Page 9:
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.160 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1003.160)
(It would be good to read the entire thread if you are interested in participating. There are tips, reports, photos, etc.)

Email this address if you're interested, or to learn where to send donation for brochures, buttons, signs, etc.:
JusticeforNatalee@gmail.com

Notes re. this show, previously listed:

Minnesota - Oct. 27, 28 - Show was cancelled due to bridge collapse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 30, 2007, 10:11:41 PM
Even though I am a computer programmer I am still new to posting on blog sites.  If I make an incorrect post please excuse me.  I think Grande did an excellent job with the excel spreadsheet.  I guess I also wonder why they interview everyone under the sun and they don't follow up.  I guess it's aruba and that's how to explain it.  And to top it off the questions that they ask require follow up and they just don't do it.

And they must have had a reason to ask the questions initially or else why ask?

I really like the new website and spell check.

There are lot's of PV's we haven't seen, so we can't really say if they didn't follow up.  That said, they were only going through the motions.  IMO, they know what happened and have been covering it up and protecting the guilty parties since at least June 1, 2005.

I agree 100%


Me three. Welcome Maria!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 30, 2007, 10:12:46 PM
Ok, I wasn't going to say anything but I really enjoy Frog Legs.  I have refrained from ordering them out of respect for Kermit and GrannyToad but if Kermit doesn't get back here and give us more info, I'm going back to my old ways. :lol:

You are such a hoot Klaas!!
And welcome maria!!
So no confirmation on the dismissal yet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 10:13:44 PM
From Lazlo / Victor @ scrux

They have done everything they had planned in their investigation (a team of KLPD and KPA) and left. I think one member of the team will return this month, but apparently the team will not return unless the OM request them to do additional investigation.

It is in the hands of the OM now, they are looking into if the evidence they have is enough to prosecute.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 30, 2007, 10:15:05 PM
Oh no!!! I know I have been gone a week...but where did the chat go?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 30, 2007, 10:15:22 PM
KERMIT - Please come back and tell me how you know the case has been DISMISSED. 


Let's hope the webbed Wonder is right on this one. The Kalpoes don't deserve a red cent. I pray they and their attorneys lose their shirts.

As far as the discovery material for the family goes it doesn't appear K2 were going to cough up anything anyway. I also have a sneaky suspicion the family already has a lot of that material. Just a hunch.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 30, 2007, 10:18:13 PM
From Lazlo / Victor @ scrux

They have done everything they had planned in their investigation (a team of KLPD and KPA) and left. I think one member of the team will return this month, but apparently the team will not return unless the OM request them to do additional investigation.

It is in the hands of the OM now, they are looking into if the evidence they have is enough to prosecute.


In other words, they are still trying to find their balls. This is the Dutch, right? A NEUTRAL country in WWI and WWII. They seem to have a hard time figuring out who the good guys are.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 10:24:03 PM
Ok, I wasn't going to say anything but I really enjoy Frog Legs.  I have refrained from ordering them out of respect for Kermit and GrannyToad but if Kermit doesn't get back here and give us more info, I'm going back to my old ways. :lol:

You are such a hoot Klaas!!
And welcome maria!!
So no confirmation on the dismissal yet?


No confirmation yet.  I'm hoping Kermit comes back and explains a little better.  There is no update at the LA Superior Courthouse yet.

Chat is gone, if you want to discuss why it's gone the Musing thread would be the proper place.  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Maria on August 30, 2007, 10:28:10 PM
Welcome, Maria!

It is nice to have another Natalee supporter join us.

My husband also is baffled by how much time I spend on the blogs!
However, he accepts it and has a lot of compassion for Natalee.

Since you live in NJ, I would like to mention that there will be an awareness campaign for Natalee in Atlantic City at the end of October. So far, there have been campaigns
in Boston, Miami, and New Orleans.


Sorry Kermit but I do love frogs legs.  Especially sauteed in garlic butter.  I did attend the "french culinary institute" in NYC and worked in the field for a while.  But I disliked the
field even though I have a degree.  I do like to discuss cooking etc. in the new "monkey musings".  I do have some recipes that anyone can cook(not meant to offend anyone) that are excellent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 10:46:29 PM
Rumored that the Prosecuter's Office held a press conference today. Possibly covering the same ground as the Bon Dia article.

If true...maybe there will be an article on it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 10:49:39 PM
Rumored that the Prosecuter's Office held a press conference today. Possibly covering the same ground as the Bon Dia article.

If true...maybe there will be an article on it.
Right - I saw someone asking about a 5pm press conference in Aruba today.  Nobody at RU seemed to know anything about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 30, 2007, 10:52:57 PM
Oh no!!! I know I have been gone a week...but where did the chat go?

POOF!!!

Just like Reality's posts.  :sad:

Have a good weekend Monkeys.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 30, 2007, 10:57:19 PM
Oh no!!! I know I have been gone a week...but where did the chat go?

POOF!!!

Just like Reality's posts.  :sad:

Have a good weekend Monkeys.

Janet

lol well, trying to stay awake to get the word on lawsuit, but looks like i'll have to wait until morning...night all Monkeys!!
Wish I could see the kalpoops' faces when they find out they aren't getting a penny!!! Oh to be a fly on the wall!!! Well, if it's true, no sense in staying quiet...spill the beans now Kalpoops!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 30, 2007, 10:59:15 PM
Rumored that the Prosecuter's Office held a press conference today. Possibly covering the same ground as the Bon Dia article.

If true...maybe there will be an article on it.
Right - I saw someone asking about a 5pm press conference in Aruba today.  Nobody at RU seemed to know anything about it.

The weekend is coming up, also a holiday. Isn't it about time for us to get some news again? :lol: :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 11:02:13 PM
Rumored that the Prosecuter's Office held a press conference today. Possibly covering the same ground as the Bon Dia article.

If true...maybe there will be an article on it.
Right - I saw someone asking about a 5pm press conference in Aruba today.  Nobody at RU seemed to know anything about it.

The weekend is coming up, also a holiday. Isn't it about time for us to get some news again? :lol: :wink:

I forgot it was a 3 day weekend, yes..you are so right!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 30, 2007, 11:03:50 PM
Rumored that the Prosecuter's Office held a press conference today. Possibly covering the same ground as the Bon Dia article.

If true...maybe there will be an article on it.
Right - I saw someone asking about a 5pm press conference in Aruba today.  Nobody at RU seemed to know anything about it.
Straight from the deuce...FOB2.   :silent:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 11:05:02 PM
Rumored that the Prosecuter's Office held a press conference today. Possibly covering the same ground as the Bon Dia article.

If true...maybe there will be an article on it.
Right - I saw someone asking about a 5pm press conference in Aruba today.  Nobody at RU seemed to know anything about it.
Straight from the deuce...FOB2.   :silent:

Hmmmm then very interresting.  My bet it's what has already been published in Bondia, or something along those lines.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:05:58 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 11:06:44 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:08:06 PM
Hello Miss Maria.

You don't think frogs taste like chicken do you?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 30, 2007, 11:10:11 PM
Ok, I wasn't going to say anything but I really enjoy Frog Legs.  I have refrained from ordering them out of respect for Kermit and GrannyToad but if Kermit doesn't get back here and give us more info, I'm going back to my old ways. :lol:

 :lol:  I'm in, Cajun style for me. You hearing this Kermie?

Eldest son's wife is French Canadian and ... her Mom cooks those little limbs in a white wine sauce.  My hubby dared our daughter-in-law to eat sashimi (raw tuna) and ... in return he promised would eat frog legs the next time her parents are visiting from Quebec.  While daughter-in-law took him up on the dare and ... he is now obligated to try at least one of those little Kermit legs.   :)

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:14:01 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: jackb on August 30, 2007, 11:16:44 PM

Is this Natalee?
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6793/93226975p7564417169oq7.jpg)




IMO - no, it's not Natalee.  The top is different and this girl looks too tall:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/notnatalee.jpg)

Didn't the MB kids go to CnC's more then once?
So Natalee would be wearing a different top (one would hope)




He could be sitting or leaning on something.  The whole picture is fogged up, it seems purposefully.           bluej


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 30, 2007, 11:16:51 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Well if it's there Klaas will find it...staying up a wee bit longer to see the results :smt015


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:18:43 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Well if it's there Klaas will find it...staying up a wee bit longer to see the results :smt015

Miss Klaasend is like a blood-hound - she'll find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 30, 2007, 11:19:37 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Well if it's there Klaas will find it...staying up a wee bit longer to see the results :smt015

Miss Klaasend is like a blood-hound - she'll find it.


lol...I agree
Where did that pic above come from? First time I saw that one


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 30, 2007, 11:20:57 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Nothing updated yet at the LA Superior Court website either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: oldencrabby on August 30, 2007, 11:22:32 PM
Just for the record, yes Kermie legs do taste like chicken!   :lol:

And - there is also Frog Eye Salad!  It's easier on the frog.  :cool:
http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Frog-Eye-Salad/Detail.aspx

'Night monkies - morning comes early.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 30, 2007, 11:23:08 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Nothing updated yet at the LA Superior Court website either.

Well, I guess we'll know tomorrow. Thanks and night all


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:28:46 PM
Just for the record, yes Kermie legs do taste like chicken!   :lol:

And - there is also Frog Eye Salad!  It's easier on the frog.  :cool:
http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Frog-Eye-Salad/Detail.aspx

'Night monkies - morning comes early.


"A frog eye pasta salad with coconut and marshmallows."

Now if only it had a fly in it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 30, 2007, 11:29:32 PM
Sorry monkeys.

I heard it on ABC/news - they had a picture of Natalee on the screen and said "the lawsuit was dismissed"



Hmmmm, ok thanks Kermit!  I'll see if I can find anything locally.

I don't get it - nothing on their local website. But I know I heard them say: LA lawsuit dismissed and they started talking about Natalee Holloway with a picture of her.



Nothing updated yet at the LA Superior Court website either.

Now I'm gonna be forced to watch the news again.
 :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 30, 2007, 11:48:11 PM
Hello all , I will also be interested in whether the case was dismiised and on what grounds.
This is a short one, will check again tomorrow. Goodnight all. Kat Munkee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 31, 2007, 12:49:19 AM
I checked a few of the LA stations and nothing on the lawsuit :( Didnt look at ones that come on at 10pm though..Either way we should know tommorow..And I dont expect a big smile on David Kocks face in Aruba this time either.. :cool: WHo was paying for those attorneys out of Naperville Ill????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 31, 2007, 12:51:41 AM

Is this Natalee?
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6793/93226975p7564417169oq7.jpg)




IMO - no, it's not Natalee.  The top is different and this girl looks too tall:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/notnatalee.jpg)

Didn't the MB kids go to CnC's more then once?
So Natalee would be wearing a different top (one would hope)




He could be sitting or leaning on something.  The whole picture is fogged up, it seems purposefully.           bluej
That looks like GVC she is dancing with, and it also looks like Karen in the forefront.  And I think it does look like Nat, but what is this going to tell us?  Also when I darkened things up on my PC the girl is wearing a skirt.  He has white pants on too.  I dunno where its getting us though.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Observer on August 31, 2007, 01:04:01 AM
I dont recognize anyone in that photo..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 01:08:45 AM
I dont recognize anyone in that photo..

I would need a little more information as to where Kermit found that photo.  I really don't think it's Natalee or GVC or anyone we know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 02:10:06 AM
#1  No word on the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil suit.  It's possible that it was an erroneous report on ABC.

#2  No word on a press conference rumored to be held in Aruba by the prosecutors office today at 5pm.  Will be interresting to see if it happened.  I suspect if it did and we haven't heard about it it's not news that makes RU happy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 02:10:20 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/1LOCK.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 31, 2007, 02:35:07 AM
#1  No word on the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil suit.  It's possible that it was an erroneous report on ABC.

#2  No word on a press conference rumored to be held in Aruba by the prosecutors office today at 5pm.  Will be interresting to see if it happened.  I suspect if it did and we haven't heard about it it's not news that makes RU happy.

I am watching channel 7 news and nothing. I swear on my life that it was that Ono guy with the dark hair that had a picture of Natalee in the background and said "The LA lawsuit was dismissed" and he went on saying Natalee Holloway...blah blah.

Very strange.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Sue on August 31, 2007, 02:48:33 AM
#1  No word on the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil suit.  It's possible that it was an erroneous report on ABC.

#2  No word on a press conference rumored to be held in Aruba by the prosecutors office today at 5pm.  Will be interresting to see if it happened.  I suspect if it did and we haven't heard about it it's not news that makes RU happy.

I am watching channel 7 news and nothing. I swear on my life that it was that Ono guy with the dark hair that had a picture of Natalee in the background and said "The LA lawsuit was dismissed" and he went on saying Natalee Holloway...blah blah.

Very strange.




what station was it on was it LA news or what


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/29/2007
Post by: Kermit on August 31, 2007, 02:58:18 AM
#1  No word on the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil suit.  It's possible that it was an erroneous report on ABC.

#2  No word on a press conference rumored to be held in Aruba by the prosecutors office today at 5pm.  Will be interresting to see if it happened.  I suspect if it did and we haven't heard about it it's not news that makes RU happy.

I am watching channel 7 news and nothing. I swear on my life that it was that Ono guy with the dark hair that had a picture of Natalee in the background and said "The LA lawsuit was dismissed" and he went on saying Natalee Holloway...blah blah.

Very strange.




what station was it on was it LA news or what

Channel 7 news



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Sue on August 31, 2007, 03:20:26 AM
Okie found this on La Court site it was just updated

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted

08/24/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Compel (2) Case Management Conference) - Not Held-Continued


Future Hearings
None




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Sue on August 31, 2007, 03:25:08 AM
Kalpoes lawyers filed this on 27th

08/27/2007 Reply/Response (OF PLTFS TO OBJECTIONS TO DECLS. AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDT'L AUTHORITY )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

 Not sure what that all means


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Sue on August 31, 2007, 03:46:21 AM

Reading back and fourth this is what i get:

08/13/2007 Declaration (of Diana Boyadjian Re Notice of Ex Parte Application )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

08/13/2007 Ex-Parte Application (for Order Shortening Time of Notice for Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint as to Jamie Skeeters (Deceased) )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent


08/13/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Ex Parte Motion - Denied



08/14/2007 Motion to Dismiss ( SET: 8-30-07)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent


08/17/2007 Reply/Response (OF PLTFS TO MOTION TO DISIMSS, ETC. )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner


08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted












Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 31, 2007, 09:08:31 AM
Okie found this on La Court site it was just updated

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted

08/24/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Compel (2) Case Management Conference) - Not Held-Continued


Future Hearings
None




Does no future hearings mean it was dismissed?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 09:18:20 AM
Okie found this on La Court site it was just updated

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted

08/24/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Compel (2) Case Management Conference) - Not Held-Continued


Future Hearings
None




Does no future hearings mean it was dismissed?

It looks to me that on the 24th -- only the motion to compel the Kalpoes was "continued" -- ( as in no ruling yet).
On the 30th (yesterday) -- the judge accepted the "motion to dismiss"  (no actual ruling on it's merit yet)

-- no future hearings expected yet until judge rules on motion to dismiss.
(but, hey -- I'm no lawyer)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 31, 2007, 09:19:30 AM
Okie found this on La Court site it was just updated

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted

08/24/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Compel (2) Case Management Conference) - Not Held-Continued


Future Hearings
None




Does no future hearings mean it was dismissed?

It looks to me that on the 24th -- only the motion to compel the Kalpoes was "continued" -- ( as in no ruling yet).
On the 30th (yesterday) -- the judge accepted the "motion to dismiss"  (no actual ruling on it's merit yet)

-- no future hearings expected yet until judge rules on motion to dismiss.
(but, hey -- I'm no lawyer)

makes sense


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 31, 2007, 09:57:25 AM
I don't think Natalee is in this pic.  The shirts look very different.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/whoisthis.jpg)

*********************************

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/nat_beach.jpg)

*********************************


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 10:43:56 AM
I don't think Natalee is in this pic.  The shirts look very different.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/whoisthis.jpg)

*********************************

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/nat_beach.jpg)

*********************************

Well, I think we can say it is not Natalee from Sunday night (from the shirt) -- but not completely ruled out for an earlier night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: msmarple on August 31, 2007, 11:13:54 AM
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/31/ (http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/8/31/)

Quote
Debi na cortamento di horea:
CINCO MUHER HAITIANO A BRINGA CU TRES MUHER DOMINICANO

 
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Diahuebs anochi diripiente den Wilhelmina Straat a cuminza un persecusion cu a termina un poco pabou di La Ronda, caminda un grupo di cinco muher Haitiano a bringa cu tres muher Dominicano.

Cu un lock di stuurwiel un di e muhernan Dominicano a haya golpi den cabez y cu Ambulans mester a worde transporta pa Hospital.

Segun informacion obteni, aki ta trata di cortamento di horea cu a tuma lugar. E muhernan Haitiano no kier a acepta esaki con cu ta di e Dominicanonan.

Un total di tres patruya a atende e pelea aki y den e autonan tabata muchanan chikito cu tabata yora di tanto zundramento y gritamento.

Online Pap translation:

debi at cortamento of horea:
cinco muher haitiano owing to fight cu three muher dominicano


oranjestad (aan): diahuebs night diripiente in wilhelmina straat owing to cuminza one persecusion cu owing to termina one some pabou of la ronda, caminda one are of cinco muher haitiano owing to fight cu three muher dominicano.

cu one lock of stuurwiel one of the muhernan dominicano owing to achieve golpi in cabez y cu ambulance have to owing to worde transporta for hospital.

according informacion obteni, here is deal of cortamento of horea cu did take lugar. the muhernan haitiano does not owing to acepta this con cu is of the dominicanonan.

one overall of three patrol owing to atende the action here y in the autonan was children diminutive cu was cry of tanto zundramento y gritamento.

* * *


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Ebb on August 31, 2007, 11:25:10 AM
Just rereading posts on front page and simian thread by 10061906, always very intelligent and had a purely intuitive not supported by research idea: Loco Stephi, Stephanie Croes and her old Zorpia site. she posted photos of the places they were searching for Natalie, and implied she was in the know. She is older now, a runner-up Miss Aruba. Did Aruba girl know her? Would Loco Stephie, maybe with the distance of time, like to tell us something if we knew a way to protect her, an anonymous post to SM or somewhere? I can't imagine she'd feel safe talking to fbi or any law person. I don't know why I think this, just that she seemed to be trying to be a mysterious player, but not stupid, and maybe has realized how the pimps mistreated her? any thoughts? hope I'm not wasting your time.
ebb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 11:32:12 AM
Just rereading posts on front page and simian thread by 10061906, always very intelligent and had a purely intuitive not supported by research idea: Loco Stephi, Stephanie Croes and her old Zorpia site. she posted photos of the places they were searching for Natalie, and implied she was in the know. She is older now, a runner-up Miss Aruba. Did Aruba girl know her? Would Loco Stephie, maybe with the distance of time, like to tell us something if we knew a way to protect her, an anonymous post to SM or somewhere? I can't imagine she'd feel safe talking to fbi or any law person. I don't know why I think this, just that she seemed to be trying to be a mysterious player, but not stupid, and maybe has realized how the pimps mistreated her? any thoughts? hope I'm not wasting your time.
ebb

Hi ebb -

Very possible that Loco Steph might be ashamed about some of the things she did in her younger days.  The FBI has all the information on Bailey Ann and everything we could find on Loco Steph.  I'm sure the family investigators have already attempted to contact her.  Not sure how anyone could guarantee her safety though, so that's a problem. 

The FBI did interview Bailey Ann.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 31, 2007, 12:21:58 PM
Joran ...Prison....2008


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 31, 2007, 12:33:28 PM
Just rereading posts on front page and simian thread by 10061906, always very intelligent and had a purely intuitive not supported by research idea: Loco Stephi, Stephanie Croes and her old Zorpia site. she posted photos of the places they were searching for Natalie, and implied she was in the know. She is older now, a runner-up Miss Aruba. Did Aruba girl know her? Would Loco Stephie, maybe with the distance of time, like to tell us something if we knew a way to protect her, an anonymous post to SM or somewhere? I can't imagine she'd feel safe talking to fbi or any law person. I don't know why I think this, just that she seemed to be trying to be a mysterious player, but not stupid, and maybe has realized how the pimps mistreated her? any thoughts? hope I'm not wasting your time.
ebb

http://www.visitaruba.com/attractions/whatson/miss_aruba.html

This doesn't look anything like loco steph. I can't imagine loco steph being allowed into a Miss anything pagent, lol. Am I missing something here??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 31, 2007, 12:38:10 PM
http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/1306462122054348724VvXtOc
Loco Steph


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 12:46:01 PM
http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/1306462122054348724VvXtOc
Loco Steph

Right NUT - that is not Loco Steph in the photo above

I need to get some work done, will be working and lurking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Vicki on August 31, 2007, 01:24:15 PM
I don't think Natalee is in this pic.  The shirts look very different.

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/whoisthis.jpg)

*********************************

(http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r139/songluva/nat_beach.jpg)

*********************************


is it me or does this guy look like the man in the bar picture looking up at Nat...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 01:33:15 PM
Vicki - it doesn't look at all like him to me. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on August 31, 2007, 01:34:46 PM
Don't know if that is Loco Steph or not but here is her philosophy as provided on that Miss Aruba site:

PHILOSOPHY
 
Life is a constant test that at all moments one should learn; one have to apply it to continue progressing; make bad, one receives punishment; do well, one get rewarded. Life is to repeat the test, when it has not been caught.


http://www.visitaruba.com/attractions/whatson/miss_aruba.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 31, 2007, 02:06:22 PM
Vicki - it doesn't look at all like him to me. 


Nor to me. And that isn't Natalee and Loco Steph was not in Miss Aruba pagent.

All totally different peeps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 31, 2007, 02:37:19 PM
Not sure if anyone knows this yet but here is the response to whether Aruba had a press confrence yesterday.....

They did not have a press conference about the case. They may have made some indirect reference to it, but we haven't heard or been invited to attend any such conference. The internet is full of misinformation and care should be exercised to distinguish fact from rumors.
Take Care, XXXXXXX

Just thought you guys would like to know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: dennisintn on August 31, 2007, 02:40:05 PM
Not sure if anyone knows this yet but here is the response to whether Aruba had a press confrence yesterday.....

They did not have a press conference about the case. They may have made some indirect reference to it, but we haven't heard or been invited to attend any such conference. The internet is full of misinformation and care should be exercised to distinguish fact from rumors.
Take Care, XXXXXXX

Just thought you guys would like to know.


hotshot, who made this statement?  sounds like they must have had a lot of inquiries about it.
dennisintn


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 31, 2007, 02:41:47 PM



Quote
hotshot, who made this statement?  sounds like they must have had a lot of inquiries about it.
dennisintn

Our Friend Jossy.  So I am sure many have inquired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 31, 2007, 02:48:58 PM
Wow, looks like this is on tonight also...8pm to midnight Natalee

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/murderinparadise.jpg)

Wheres carpe??  Needs to be taped


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 31, 2007, 02:50:16 PM
Wow, looks like this is on tonight also...8pm to midnight Natalee

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/murderinparadise.jpg)

Wheres carpe??  Needs to be taped

Oopsssss Saturday, sorry


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 02:53:00 PM
Hotshot - I wonder if it's a repeat? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: ldstlou on August 31, 2007, 02:55:15 PM
Wow, looks like this is on tonight also...8pm to midnight Natalee

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/murderinparadise.jpg)

Wheres carpe??  Needs to be taped

Oopsssss Saturday, sorry

Thanks Hotshot...hope it is new stuff and not just a rerun..but any publicity does help!! I am setting my dvr to record it now!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 31, 2007, 03:05:40 PM
Posted this in Musings should have posted it here.

Hi everyone,

Greta is going to have "Missing in Paradise"  on Saturday 8 pm. It will have the jvds interview again. So it looks like a repeat. Not sure.


Hope everyone has a safe holiday weekend.

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Hotshot on August 31, 2007, 03:09:37 PM
Hotshot - I wonder if it's a repeat? 
Well hope its not, but I am sure it is.  4 hours though so I think I am going to make it a night and watch anyway, maybe theres something we have forgotten about, something that will jiggle our memories.  Anyway, off to work, have a good day, see you all tonight..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: ospainter on August 31, 2007, 03:10:34 PM
It is the 2006 Documentary that Greta did about the case.


9 Murder in the Heartland 2006 Jill Berhman.

10 2006 Dark Waters Chuck Rutherford and Lana Stempien.

OS
 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 03:11:09 PM
Hotshot - I wonder if it's a repeat? 
Well hope its not, but I am sure it is.  4 hours though so I think I am going to make it a night and watch anyway, maybe theres something we have forgotten about, something that will jiggle our memories.  Anyway, off to work, have a good day, see you all tonight..

Yes, me too!  Have a good day!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Sue on August 31, 2007, 03:33:48 PM
Wow, looks like this is on tonight also...8pm to midnight Natalee

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/murderinparadise.jpg)

Wheres carpe??  Needs to be taped

Oopsssss Saturday, sorry

it is 8 pm eastern and midnight eastern time


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 03:35:34 PM
Regarding the rumored press conference in Aruba yesterday.  This was posted by Victor at Scrux:


Victor

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Posts: 22

Quote
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:34 am    Post subject: Press Conference had nothing to do with NH case

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
ORANJESTAD - "We hebben nu officieel een conflict in het Koninkrijk." Dat zei de Arubaanse premier Nelson Oduber donderdag in Oranjestad in een persconferentie over het bezoek woensdag van staatssecretaris Ank Bijleveld-Schouten (Koninkrijksrelaties) aan Aruba.

"Dit heeft consequenties voor de toekomst", aldus Oduber, die sinds lange tijd ook het woord onafhankelijkheid in zijn mond neemt. Hij heeft donderdag ambtenaren bevolen het overleg met Nederland op te schorten.

Premier Oduber is kwaad dat Nederland niet met geld over de brug komt dat werd verdiend aan de verkoop van gebouwen waarin nu het Arubaanse Marriott-hotel zit.
-----------------------

Premier Oduber said during a press conference Thursday in Oranjestad about the visit of State-Secretary Ank Bijleveld Schouten that there are consequences for the future and used the word "independance".
Premier Oduber is angry because Holland does not come up with the money that was earned with the sale of the buildings where now the Aruban Marriott is located.


Just in case anyone was wondering what the press conference was about.

(if to much of-topic please delete).

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 04:07:58 PM
We need someone with California law experience to explain what this actually means.  To me it, by saying NO FUTURE HEARING it sounds like the CASE has been dismissed.  Others are saying only the Jamie Skeeters involvement, I'm not so sure.  In the past there have always been future hearing dates listed:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/KalpoeDrPhil.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 31, 2007, 04:20:56 PM
It sounds too good to be true, but I hope it has been dismissed altogether. Maybe there's something going on we don't know yet...oh well I can dream. :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: GrannyToad on August 31, 2007, 04:28:15 PM
Regarding the rumored press conference in Aruba yesterday.  This was posted by Victor at Scrux:


Victor

Joined: 16 Nov 2006
Posts: 22

Quote
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:34 am    Post subject: Press Conference had nothing to do with NH case

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
ORANJESTAD - "We hebben nu officieel een conflict in het Koninkrijk." Dat zei de Arubaanse premier Nelson Oduber donderdag in Oranjestad in een persconferentie over het bezoek woensdag van staatssecretaris Ank Bijleveld-Schouten (Koninkrijksrelaties) aan Aruba.

"Dit heeft consequenties voor de toekomst", aldus Oduber, die sinds lange tijd ook het woord onafhankelijkheid in zijn mond neemt. Hij heeft donderdag ambtenaren bevolen het overleg met Nederland op te schorten.

Premier Oduber is kwaad dat Nederland niet met geld over de brug komt dat werd verdiend aan de verkoop van gebouwen waarin nu het Arubaanse Marriott-hotel zit.
-----------------------

Premier Oduber said during a press conference Thursday in Oranjestad about the visit of State-Secretary Ank Bijleveld Schouten that there are consequences for the future and used the word "independance".
Premier Oduber is angry because Holland does not come up with the money that was earned with the sale of the buildings where now the Aruban Marriott is located.


Just in case anyone was wondering what the press conference was about.

(if to much of-topic please delete).

 

I translate that as NL dealt with that as a creditor in a bankruptcy might, due to outstanding debt default.

Not getting wasteful extravagant hands on the proceeds really put Oduber in a snit, eh? Probably a Good Thing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on August 31, 2007, 04:34:40 PM


I translate that as NL dealt with that as a creditor in a bankruptcy might, due to outstanding debt default.

Not getting wasteful extravagant hands on the proceeds really put Oduber in a snit, eh? Probably a Good Thing.



That's what I got Granny T. It looks like Holland garnisheed Aruba's wages for past debt and Oduber is having a hissy fit  threatening to secede. No more teat for Nelson.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 04:41:44 PM
Another quadracer accident in Aruba. 

Turista a perde control riba Quadracer

Friday, 31 August 2007 

Diabierna 11or mainta un dama cu tabata core quadracer banda di Ayo a dal contra di e cura di ayo rock formation. E turista a herida su mes y a pidi ambulance cu urgencia na e lugar.

Polis tambe a presenta. Por a compronde cu e la perde control di e quadracer y esaki a dal na e cura. Esnan cu ta biba den e area ta bisa cu turista ta core manera loco den e area aki y no ta prome biaha cu algo asina ta pasa heynan. Ambulance a hiba e turista hospital cu no tabata kier pa prensa saca su potret.

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/aug%2031/aug%2031%20front/turista00.jpg)


(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/aug%2031/aug%2031%20front/turista02.jpg)
 
Through translator:

friday, 31 august 2007 diabierna 11or morning one lady cu was core quadracer near of good-bye owing to strike contra of the cura of good-bye rock formation. the tourist owing to injury his self y owing to ask ambulance cu urgencia at the lugar. police also owing to present. can owing to compronde cu the la lose control of the quadracer y this owing to strike at the cura. esnan cu live in the area is tell cu tourist is core as loco in the area here y do not first trip cu algo so is happen heynan. ambulance owing to take away the tourist hospital cu not was wanted for prensa saca his potret. come across

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/2015/8/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 31, 2007, 04:43:35 PM
Hotshot - I wonder if it's a repeat? 


a repeat of the repeat, I am sure...keeps her name out there though


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 05:12:20 PM
Tropical Depression Six - Aruba is under a tropical storm watch:

(http://icons.wunderground.com/data/images/at200706.gif)

(http://icons.wunderground.com/data/images/at200706_sat.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 05:38:06 PM

Reading back and fourth this is what i get:

08/13/2007 Declaration (of Diana Boyadjian Re Notice of Ex Parte Application )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

08/13/2007 Ex-Parte Application (for Order Shortening Time of Notice for Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint as to Jamie Skeeters (Deceased) )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent


08/13/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Ex Parte Motion - Denied

All an ex parte motion means it that it is held without the other side... and they are not going to give the Plaintiff's less time to respond to Motions.. this is a motion to say that the Plaintiff's have less time to respond ... example 15 days instead of 30, looking solely at the title of the motion....


08/14/2007 Motion to Dismiss ( SET: 8-30-07)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent


08/17/2007 Reply/Response (OF PLTFS TO MOTION TO DISIMSS, ETC. )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner


08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted




no ruling has been made on the Motion to Dismiss








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 05:41:48 PM
Okie found this on La Court site it was just updated

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted

08/24/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Compel (2) Case Management Conference) - Not Held-Continued


Future Hearings
None




Does no future hearings mean it was dismissed?

It looks to me that on the 24th -- only the motion to compel the Kalpoes was "continued" -- ( as in no ruling yet).
On the 30th (yesterday) -- the judge accepted the "motion to dismiss"  (no actual ruling on it's merit yet)

-- no future hearings expected yet until judge rules on motion to dismiss.
(but, hey -- I'm no lawyer)
Am I close??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 05:42:00 PM
We need someone with California law experience to explain what this actually means.  To me it, by saying NO FUTURE HEARING it sounds like the CASE has been dismissed.  Others are saying only the Jamie Skeeters involvement, I'm not so sure.  In the past there have always been future hearing dates listed:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/KalpoeDrPhil.jpg)


I don't know CA law... (disclaimer) but this doesn't mean it has been dismissed there is a ruling pending... there is just no further hearings or motions filed at the moment.... it can be dismissed still though..... and very well may be, but right now there isn't a ruling issued.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 05:43:34 PM
Okie found this on La Court site it was just updated

Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

08/30/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Dismiss - Submitted

08/24/2007 at 08:30 am in Department 69, Edward A. Ferns, Presiding
Motion to Compel (2) Case Management Conference) - Not Held-Continued


Future Hearings
None




Does no future hearings mean it was dismissed?

It looks to me that on the 24th -- only the motion to compel the Kalpoes was "continued" -- ( as in no ruling yet).
On the 30th (yesterday) -- the judge accepted the "motion to dismiss"  (no actual ruling on it's merit yet)

-- no future hearings expected yet until judge rules on motion to dismiss.
(but, hey -- I'm no lawyer)
Am I close??

you are almost there... continued just means that one side or the other could not appear in Court and both sides agreed to wait for another date... the Court will reschedule a hearing if necessary... in a motion to compel, the opposing side could have filed a motion stating they would comply but needed more time... and then a motion to continue could be granted.... 

if they don't comply then another motion to compel and ask for a hearing can be filed...

they may have filed the "continuance" based upon the motion to dismiss... to see if they would have to comply...

making sense to y'all at all??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 05:49:57 PM
Quote
making sense to y'all at all??
 
« Last Edit: Today at 04:47:18 PM by mrs. red » 



LOL -- why don't they just say it like you say it!?!?
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 05:51:33 PM
Quote
making sense to y'all at all??
 
« Last Edit: Today at 04:47:18 PM by mrs. red » 



LOL -- why don't they just say it like you say it!?!?
 


they get paid by the word..... :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 06:23:53 PM
Mrs. Red - FYI, the Twitty vs. Kalpoe wrongful death suit in LA is still pending as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 06:27:07 PM
Mrs. Red - FYI, the Twitty vs. Kalpoe wrongful death suit in LA is still pending as well.

TY... that ruling will probably take it's decision from all of these, at least in part....that is just a guess... I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on August 31, 2007, 06:27:41 PM
Mrs. Red - FYI, the Twitty vs. Kalpoe wrongful death suit in LA is still pending as well.

Really? :shock: I thought it was dismissed,gone,outta here,no way. :P


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 06:28:20 PM
I'm really glad TES isn't there right now!

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/breaking%20news.gif)

Tropical Storm Watch pa islanan ABC         
Friday, 31 August 2007 

Diabierna atardi 5'or Gobierno di Aruba y Antiyas a jama un tropical storm watch pa Aruba, Boneiro y Curacao. E tropical storm watch aki ta nifica cu e islanan ABC por sinti efectonan di un tormenta tropical den e sigiente 36 oranan. Ta trata aki di e di 6 depresion tropical. Ainda ta prematura pa bisa kiko Aruba lo por sinti of no. Actualmente ta tumando lugar un conferencia di prensa na meteo pa asina duna mas informacion. Keda up to date cu 24ora.com. Click read more pa e informacion oficial di National Hurricae Center.

AT 5 PM AST...THE GOVERNMENT OF THE NETHERLANDS ANTILLES AND ARUBA
HAS ISSUED A TROPICAL STORM WATCH FOR THE ISLANDS OF
ARUBA...BONAIRE AND CURACAO.  A TROPICAL STORM WATCH MEANS THAT
TROPICAL STORM CONDITIONS ARE POSSIBLE WITHIN THE WATCH
AREA...GENERALLY WITHIN 36 HOURS.

AT 500 PM AST...2100Z...THE CENTER OF THE NEWLY FORMED TROPICAL
DEPRESSION SIX WAS LOCATED NEAR LATITUDE 11.8 NORTH...LONGITUDE
58.6 WEST OR ABOUT 180 MILES...295 KM...EAST-SOUTHEAST OF THE
WINDWARD ISLANDS.

THE DEPRESSION IS MOVING TOWARD THE WEST NEAR 16 MPH AND THIS
GENERAL MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE FOR THE NEXT 24 HOURS.  ON
THIS TRACK...THE DEPRESSION WILL BE PASSING THROUGH THE WINDWARD
ISLANDS OVERNIGHT. 

MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS ARE NEAR 35 MPH...55 KM/HR...WITH HIGHER
GUSTS.  THE DEPRESSION COULD BECOME A TROPICAL STORM ON SATURDAY.

THE ESTIMATED MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE FROM SURFACE OBSERVATIONS AND
AN AIR FORCE RESERVE HURRICANE HUNTER IS 1008 MB...29.77 INCHES.

TOTAL RAIN ACCUMULATIONS OF 2 TO 5 INCHES ARE POSSIBLE ACROSS THE
WINDWARD ISLANDS...COASTAL VENEZUELA INCLUDING OFFSHORE
ISLANDS...AS WELL AS THE NETHERLAND ANTILLES OF ARUBA...BONAIRE AND
CURACAO.

REPEATING THE 500 PM AST POSITION...11.8 N...58.6 W.  MOVEMENT
TOWARD...WEST NEAR 16 MPH.  MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...35 MPH.
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1008 MB.

AN INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY WILL BE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL HURRICANE
CENTER AT 800 PM AST FOLLOWED BY THE NEXT COMPLETE ADVISORY AT 1100
PM AST.

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/2017/5/
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 06:30:45 PM
Mrs. Red - FYI, the Twitty vs. Kalpoe wrongful death suit in LA is still pending as well.

Really? :shock: I thought it was dismissed,gone,outta here,no way. :P

REALLY! :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/TwittyKalpoe.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on August 31, 2007, 06:54:30 PM
Mrs Red.. TY for the explanation. Kind of gets confusing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 07:08:27 PM
Mrs Red.. TY for the explanation. Kind of gets confusing.

well I am not an atty .. but I have drafted plenty of these kinds of motions... motion to dismiss, motion to continue etc.... why they talk like that is beyond me... :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 31, 2007, 07:34:43 PM
Klaas, do we have the transcripts from JVDS book anywhere here?

Oh, and Mrs. Red your avi is too cute!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 07:43:48 PM
Klaas, do we have the transcripts from JVDS book anywhere here?

Oh, and Mrs. Red your avi is too cute!!

Yes, I think most of them.  They are in this thread in the Important Case Document area.  Most are summaries of the chapters:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1097.0

Here is another thread with some translations that Ramm did that I copied from BFN, I think that's on page 2 in the Important Case Document forum.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1117.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: JuJu on August 31, 2007, 07:55:13 PM
THANK YOU!   I had read some of it at BFN but my blood pressure got so high I thought I might have a stroke and I had to stop.  But as others have stated "it is a confession" and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 31, 2007, 07:55:37 PM
We were discussing Boca Mahos the other day. Here is a great photo. (2005)
http://travel.webshots.com/photo/1263868450014336141qvyqlk


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: CJ1 on August 31, 2007, 07:59:32 PM
Mrs. Red - FYI, the Twitty vs. Kalpoe wrongful death suit in LA is still pending as well.

Really? :shock: I thought it was dismissed,gone,outta here,no way. :P

REALLY! :wink:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/TwittyKalpoe.jpg)

Thanks for the clarification.  I too thought we were told that the case had been dismissed.  I'm glad Beth still has a chance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 08:24:54 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 08:28:59 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".

Maybe they are appealing it?  I really don't know.  Just noticed the hearing in December and that it was still listed as pending. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 08:32:35 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".

Maybe they are appealing it?  I really don't know.  Just noticed the hearing in December and that it was still listed as pending. 
Hope so! It does appear to be "alive"! :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: sharon on August 31, 2007, 08:48:54 PM
We were discussing Boca Mahos the other day. Here is a great photo. (2005)
http://travel.webshots.com/photo/1263868450014336141qvyqlk
Thanks Nut.

All of the photos are really great -- this guy must be a professional.

That helicopter shot of 'California Point' -- kind of creepy to think....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 09:18:00 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".

Maybe they are appealing it?  I really don't know.  Just noticed the hearing in December and that it was still listed as pending. 

Well, I *thinK* the Court systems says on appeal.. that i don't remember... umI know I should remember but when did we hear that they dismissed it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 09:25:22 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".

Maybe they are appealing it?  I really don't know.  Just noticed the hearing in December and that it was still listed as pending. 

Well, I *thinK* the Court systems says on appeal.. that i don't remember... umI know I should remember but when did we hear that they dismissed it?

Not positive, but I think it was back in June 2007 that we heard the Twitty vs. Kalpoe case was dismissed.  I don't think we ever saw anything from the court saying it was dismissed though or if we did I don't remember.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 09:31:12 PM
I wondered... I would have thought greta would have jqk on if it had been dismissed...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 09:31:37 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".

Maybe they are appealing it?  I really don't know.  Just noticed the hearing in December and that it was still listed as pending. 

Well, I *thinK* the Court systems says on appeal.. that i don't remember... umI know I should remember but when did we hear that they dismissed it?

Not positive, but I think it was back in June 2007 that we heard the Twitty vs. Kalpoe case was dismissed.  I don't think we ever saw anything from the court saying it was dismissed though or if we did I don't remember.
June '07 -- about the time of the last disinformation campaign. Did we actually see it was "dismissed" or did we just believe MF and company?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 09:34:44 PM
I was certainly under the impression that the "wrongful death" suit was thrown out as well! I thought it was "jurisdictional".

Maybe they are appealing it?  I really don't know.  Just noticed the hearing in December and that it was still listed as pending. 

Well, I *thinK* the Court systems says on appeal.. that i don't remember... umI know I should remember but when did we hear that they dismissed it?

Not positive, but I think it was back in June 2007 that we heard the Twitty vs. Kalpoe case was dismissed.  I don't think we ever saw anything from the court saying it was dismissed though or if we did I don't remember.
June '07 -- about the time of the last disinformation campaign. Did we actually see it was "dismissed" or did we just believe MF and company?

probably just believed the old disinformation garbage....why do we fall for crap??? :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: robots on August 31, 2007, 09:36:05 PM
 :cool:

the only thing i want for christmas is for Natalee to be returned


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 09:37:01 PM
They may have lost, or it was dismissed for the jurisdiction.  I'm wondering though if it's been appealed? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 09:37:44 PM
:cool:

the only thing i want for christmas is for Natalee to be returned

Hi Robots - join the club  :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: robots on August 31, 2007, 09:46:30 PM
:cool:

the only thing i want for christmas is for Natalee to be returned

Hi Robots - join the club  :wink:



 :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 09:59:16 PM
After thinking some more -- maybe the ruling in June was that the Holloway/Twittys could not "attach" the wrongful death suit to the Dr. Phil suit. Maybe Beth, filed a whole different suit after that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 10:07:06 PM
After thinking some more -- maybe the ruling in June was that the Holloway/Twittys could not "attach" the wrongful death suit to the Dr. Phil suit. Maybe Beth, filed a whole different suit after that.

This is what was reported back then:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18989639/

Holloway wrongful-death suit dismissed
Judge in L.A. tosses suit filed by parents over teen who vanished in Aruba


Updated: 4:54 p.m. PT June 1, 2007
LOS ANGELES - A judge on Friday dismissed a wrongful-death lawsuit against two brothers from the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba that was filed by the parents of an American teenager who vanished during a vacation there.

The parents of Natalee Holloway cannot sue in Los Angeles because the case has no California connection and the courts lack jurisdiction over the brothers, Superior Court Judge Charles C. Lee said.

The teen's parents, Elizabeth Ann Twitty of Alabama and Dave E. Holloway of Mississippi, will decide whether to appeal, said their attorney, John Q. Kelly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 10:14:08 PM
I just posted a list of all the documents/motions/decisions listed at the LA Superior Court website on both cases here:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=752.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 10:25:11 PM
After thinking some more -- maybe the ruling in June was that the Holloway/Twittys could not "attach" the wrongful death suit to the Dr. Phil suit. Maybe Beth, filed a whole different suit after that.

This is what was reported back then:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18989639/

Holloway wrongful-death suit dismissed
Judge in L.A. tosses suit filed by parents over teen who vanished in Aruba


Updated: 4:54 p.m. PT June 1, 2007
LOS ANGELES - A judge on Friday dismissed a wrongful-death lawsuit against two brothers from the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba that was filed by the parents of an American teenager who vanished during a vacation there.

The parents of Natalee Holloway cannot sue in Los Angeles because the case has no California connection and the courts lack jurisdiction over the brothers, Superior Court Judge Charles C. Lee said.

The teen's parents, Elizabeth Ann Twitty of Alabama and Dave E. Holloway of Mississippi, will decide whether to appeal, said their attorney, John Q. Kelly.

Thanks -- the original suit was by both Dave and Beth ---- is only Beth alone filing the "appeal"?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: mrs. red on August 31, 2007, 10:51:51 PM
ok.. so now we know that it was dismissed, but with the k2 suit that may change... let's hope so!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 10:55:19 PM
ok.. so now we know that it was dismissed, but with the k2 suit that may change... let's hope so!
Well, that is from back in June.  The "pending" and the future court date of December 2007 was there prior to the Kalpoe hearing on August 30th.  I'm wondering if JQK has appealed their wrongful death suit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 31, 2007, 11:13:22 PM
> Possibility that the court postings on Kalpoe v Phil are not complete. Site update in the coming days...week...may provide clarity.

> Are we to believe that Paulus did not own a cell phone? What are the odds?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 11:15:19 PM
> Possibility that the court postings on Kalpoe v Phil are not complete. Site update in the coming days...week...may provide clarity.

> Are we to believe that Paulus did not own a cell phone? What are the odds?

Of course he owned a cell phone.  They all have cell phones in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 11:15:41 PM
> Possibility that the court postings on Kalpoe v Phil are not complete. Site update in the coming days...week...may provide clarity.

> Are we to believe that Paulus did not own a cell phone? What are the odds?

???? :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 31, 2007, 11:25:40 PM
KLPD should search all cell calls made between 2am - 5am on the night in question. How many would there be...hundreds...thousands?

Get the list, look for a match amoung all the 20 or so suspects / witnesses of interest. There has to a program that could do that, with ease. IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 11:27:24 PM
KLPD should search all cell calls made between 2am - 5am on the night in question. How many would there be...hundreds...thousands?

Get the list, look for a match amoung all the 20 or so suspects / witnesses of interest. There has to a program that could do that, with ease. IMO

My bet is they already have all the cell records including Sander's and PVDS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 11:28:29 PM
KLPD should search all cell calls made between 2am - 5am on the night in question. How many would there be...hundreds...thousands?

Get the list, look for a match amoung all the 20 or so suspects / witnesses of interest. There has to a program that could do that, with ease. IMO
I'm not following your train of thought. What did you mean by "site update"?  :-|


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 11:32:54 PM
KLPD should search all cell calls made between 2am - 5am on the night in question. How many would there be...hundreds...thousands?

Get the list, look for a match amoung all the 20 or so suspects / witnesses of interest. There has to a program that could do that, with ease. IMO
I'm not following your train of thought. What did you mean by "site update"?  :-|

I think what Igsigs is saying is that maybe the LA SUPERIOR COURT website hasn't completely updated everything n the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  I know there should be a document filed from August 30th and that's not there yet.  So maybe in a few days there will be more information on what if anything was dismissed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 11:34:53 PM
KLPD should search all cell calls made between 2am - 5am on the night in question. How many would there be...hundreds...thousands?

Get the list, look for a match amoung all the 20 or so suspects / witnesses of interest. There has to a program that could do that, with ease. IMO
I'm not following your train of thought. What did you mean by "site update"?  :-|

I think what Igsigs is saying is that maybe the LA SUPERIOR COURT website hasn't completely updated everything n the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  I know there should be a document filed from August 30th and that's not there yet.  So maybe in a few days there will be more information on what if anything was dismissed.

Ahhh!  :2doh:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 31, 2007, 11:35:42 PM
My bet is they already have all the cell records including Sander's and PVDS.
It is interesting that Sander's cell was a PV topic. Maybe ALE found a call of interest...and asked him to cough up his phone.

I always thought it was curious that Sander had not reported the theft, or tried to replace it *yet* at the time of his interview.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 11:37:18 PM
My bet is they already have all the cell records including Sander's and PVDS.
It is interesting that Sander's cell was a PV topic. Maybe ALE found a call of interest...and asked him to cough up his phone.

I always thought it was curious that Sander had not reported the theft, or tried to replace it *yet* at the time of his interview.

Didn't he say he reported it to Freddy?  :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: robots on August 31, 2007, 11:43:06 PM
My bet is they already have all the cell records including Sander's and PVDS.
It is interesting that Sander's cell was a PV topic. Maybe ALE found a call of interest...and asked him to cough up his phone.

I always thought it was curious that Sander had not reported the theft, or tried to replace it *yet* at the time of his interview.

Didn't he say he reported it to Freddy?  :lol:


 :lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 31, 2007, 11:45:59 PM
Didn't he say he reported it to Freddy?  :lol:
Yes!  :lol:

IIRC, in the first few days. Then...nothing. Freddy was too busy shopping for sneaks to help Sander.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on August 31, 2007, 11:46:59 PM
So here's what we know today that we didn't know last night:

#1 - there was a press conference yesterday but it was NOT pertaining to the NH case

#2 - it appears something may have been dismissed on Aug 30th in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case but we don't know exactly what.  We don't know if it's only pertaining to Skeeters or the entire case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: igsigs on August 31, 2007, 11:51:08 PM
So here's what we know today that we didn't know last night:

#1 - there was a press conference yesterday but it was NOT pertaining to the NH case

#2 - it appears something may have been dismissed on Aug 30th in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case but we don't know exactly what.  We don't know if it's only pertaining to Skeeters or the entire case.
+ Lazlo said that 1 KLPDer may be returning. Heartening to think that the KLPD are not totally out of the picture.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on August 31, 2007, 11:58:33 PM
Despite the insanely inept/corrupt ALE, the FACTS are still out there to be looked at. The KLPD knows. The FBI knows. .....
It was brought up again last night about the US Government taking over after "closure" by the Arubans. The Dutch and FBI are working together -- maybe that IS the route they are taking. It will take something extraordinary to break free of the Aruban system.
I still say that "high level" cooperation between the U.S. and The Netherlands will dictate this case. ( :sad: this is not going to wrap up quickly -- but I keep the faith!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: igsigs on September 01, 2007, 12:08:41 AM
I still say that "high level" cooperation between the U.S. and The Netherlands will dictate this case.
Dompig appearing before Congress to explain how the FBI ruined the case is what i want to see. With his pathologist Mr. Naar in tow to explain his case theory.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on September 01, 2007, 12:09:58 AM
A little more information on Odubers' tantrum.


Aruba withdraws from
constitutional process

ORANJESTAD--Aruba has stopped participating, for the time being, in the negotiations for new constitutional arrangements for the Netherlands Antilles constellation.

Aruba’s decision was taken after negotiations with the Dutch Government on sharing the proceeds from the selling of Plant N.V. went sour.

“No money, no deal,” State Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld-Schouten had said on Wednesday after her meeting with the Aruban Government about Plant N.V.

Hopes had been high that the issue of Plant N.V., which seemed to have been taking forever, would be finalised during Bijleveld-Schouten’s brief visit to Aruba.

Plant N.V. owns the buildings in which Marriott Hotel is currently housed. However, the buildings have been sold. Aruba had temporarily ceded its shares to the Netherlands as a guarantee for a loan, but it still considers itself as being the owner of the buildings.

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber hinted after his visit in the Netherlands in July that an agreement had been reached and that only the amount the Dutch had to pay Aruba had to be negotiated. However, Bijleveld-Schouten said on Wednesday that an agreement had already been reached on the amount: 151 million guilders, to be exact.

Oduber denied having reached any agreement and said he had informed the State Secretary in July that he had calculated a different amount. He believes Aruba is entitled to a higher percentage of the selling price of US $237 million. According to him, it had been agreed that further deliberations would take place on the level of civil servants and that the final amount would be determined in August.

After no agreement was reached on Plant N.V., the Aruban Government said the relationship between the island and the Netherlands had deteriorated. Also, Oduber ordered Aruba civil servants to stop participating in the negotiations for constitutional changes in the Netherlands Antilles.

Prime Minister of the Netherlands Antilles Emily de Jongh-Elhage told The Daily Herald she had taken notice of the media reports on the issue, but hadn’t received any official information from either Aruba or the Netherlands on the issue.

“I can’t really comment on it at this moment. Before Bijleveld-Schouten left for Aruba earlier this week, she told me that Aruba’s participation in the process has been very positive. I would like to remain positive on the issue,” she said. Constitutional Affairs Minister Roland Duncan was surprised when he was told what had happened. He was in Bonaire for a seminar on National Archives with the participation of all island territories and Aruba.

“You’re kidding!” Duncan said, after he was informed of Aruba’s decision to pull out of the constitutional change process.

He said he had no knowledge of what had transpired in Aruba and he would have to call Curaçao to find out. However, he expressed his concern about how Kingdom partners were dealing with each other when negotiating on several matters.

He said the Netherlands had been playing “hard ball” with the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. He also contended that the Netherlands Antilles hadn’t been treating Aruba fairly.

“Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles have a cooperation agreement on the Common Court of Justice. But, meanwhile, the Netherlands Antilles has negotiated a consensus Kingdom Law with the Netherlands on Justice without telling Aruba,” Duncan said.

He strongly believes that better communication with Aruba is needed. “I have just agreed with Oduber that the Ministerial working group between the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba would meet again in September after being inactive for I don’t know how many years.”

Asked about Aruba’s decision to involve the constitutional change process of the Netherlands Antilles in its dispute with the Netherlands, Duncan said it probably had been done for leverage. While he believes it’s not correct, Duncan admits that the Dutch constantly do the same.

“In the accord signed on Tuesday with Curaçao and the Central Government, the Dutch used the leverage of money to incorporate new conditions to the debt relief programme in the accord,” Duncan cited as an example.

Constitutional Affairs Commissioner of Curaçao Zita Jesus-Leito too wasn’t aware of what had transpired in Aruba. But, she said she wouldn’t let these types of disputes and occurrences derail her attention from the main issue, which is the constitutional change process for Curaçao.

“Now it’s Aruba that doesn’t want to talk to the Netherlands. A couple of weeks ago it was Saba that had put a stop to its talks with the Netherlands. I will inform myself on what is happening, but I can’t let these things take up my time and attention,” she said.

This newspaper was unable to contact Constitutional Affairs Commissioner Sarah Wescot-Williams for her comments on this latest development.
 



Copyright ©2006 The Daily Herald St. Maarten
E-mail Webmaster 84   
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on September 01, 2007, 12:11:24 AM
A little more information on Odubers' tantrum.


Aruba withdraws from
constitutional process

ORANJESTAD--Aruba has stopped participating, for the time being, in the negotiations for new constitutional arrangements for the Netherlands Antilles constellation.

Aruba’s decision was taken after negotiations with the Dutch Government on sharing the proceeds from the selling of Plant N.V. went sour.

“No money, no deal,” State Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld-Schouten had said on Wednesday after her meeting with the Aruban Government about Plant N.V.

Hopes had been high that the issue of Plant N.V., which seemed to have been taking forever, would be finalised during Bijleveld-Schouten’s brief visit to Aruba.

Plant N.V. owns the buildings in which Marriott Hotel is currently housed. However, the buildings have been sold. Aruba had temporarily ceded its shares to the Netherlands as a guarantee for a loan, but it still considers itself as being the owner of the buildings.

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber hinted after his visit in the Netherlands in July that an agreement had been reached and that only the amount the Dutch had to pay Aruba had to be negotiated. However, Bijleveld-Schouten said on Wednesday that an agreement had already been reached on the amount: 151 million guilders, to be exact.

Oduber denied having reached any agreement and said he had informed the State Secretary in July that he had calculated a different amount. He believes Aruba is entitled to a higher percentage of the selling price of US $237 million. According to him, it had been agreed that further deliberations would take place on the level of civil servants and that the final amount would be determined in August.

After no agreement was reached on Plant N.V., the Aruban Government said the relationship between the island and the Netherlands had deteriorated. Also, Oduber ordered Aruba civil servants to stop participating in the negotiations for constitutional changes in the Netherlands Antilles.

Prime Minister of the Netherlands Antilles Emily de Jongh-Elhage told The Daily Herald she had taken notice of the media reports on the issue, but hadn’t received any official information from either Aruba or the Netherlands on the issue.

“I can’t really comment on it at this moment. Before Bijleveld-Schouten left for Aruba earlier this week, she told me that Aruba’s participation in the process has been very positive. I would like to remain positive on the issue,” she said. Constitutional Affairs Minister Roland Duncan was surprised when he was told what had happened. He was in Bonaire for a seminar on National Archives with the participation of all island territories and Aruba.

“You’re kidding!” Duncan said, after he was informed of Aruba’s decision to pull out of the constitutional change process.

He said he had no knowledge of what had transpired in Aruba and he would have to call Curaçao to find out. However, he expressed his concern about how Kingdom partners were dealing with each other when negotiating on several matters.

He said the Netherlands had been playing “hard ball” with the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. He also contended that the Netherlands Antilles hadn’t been treating Aruba fairly.

“Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles have a cooperation agreement on the Common Court of Justice. But, meanwhile, the Netherlands Antilles has negotiated a consensus Kingdom Law with the Netherlands on Justice without telling Aruba,” Duncan said.

He strongly believes that better communication with Aruba is needed. “I have just agreed with Oduber that the Ministerial working group between the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba would meet again in September after being inactive for I don’t know how many years.”

Asked about Aruba’s decision to involve the constitutional change process of the Netherlands Antilles in its dispute with the Netherlands, Duncan said it probably had been done for leverage. While he believes it’s not correct, Duncan admits that the Dutch constantly do the same.

“In the accord signed on Tuesday with Curaçao and the Central Government, the Dutch used the leverage of money to incorporate new conditions to the debt relief programme in the accord,” Duncan cited as an example.

Constitutional Affairs Commissioner of Curaçao Zita Jesus-Leito too wasn’t aware of what had transpired in Aruba. But, she said she wouldn’t let these types of disputes and occurrences derail her attention from the main issue, which is the constitutional change process for Curaçao.

“Now it’s Aruba that doesn’t want to talk to the Netherlands. A couple of weeks ago it was Saba that had put a stop to its talks with the Netherlands. I will inform myself on what is happening, but I can’t let these things take up my time and attention,” she said.

This newspaper was unable to contact Constitutional Affairs Commissioner Sarah Wescot-Williams for her comments on this latest development.
 



Copyright ©2006 The Daily Herald St. Maarten
E-mail Webmaster 84   
 
 
 


Thanks SuzieQ - do you have a link to this article?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on September 01, 2007, 12:16:39 AM
A little more information on Odubers' tantrum.


Aruba withdraws from
constitutional process

ORANJESTAD--Aruba has stopped participating, for the time being, in the negotiations for new constitutional arrangements for the Netherlands Antilles constellation.

Aruba’s decision was taken after negotiations with the Dutch Government on sharing the proceeds from the selling of Plant N.V. went sour.

“No money, no deal,” State Secretary of Kingdom Relations Ank Bijleveld-Schouten had said on Wednesday after her meeting with the Aruban Government about Plant N.V.

Hopes had been high that the issue of Plant N.V., which seemed to have been taking forever, would be finalised during Bijleveld-Schouten’s brief visit to Aruba.

Plant N.V. owns the buildings in which Marriott Hotel is currently housed. However, the buildings have been sold. Aruba had temporarily ceded its shares to the Netherlands as a guarantee for a loan, but it still considers itself as being the owner of the buildings.

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber hinted after his visit in the Netherlands in July that an agreement had been reached and that only the amount the Dutch had to pay Aruba had to be negotiated. However, Bijleveld-Schouten said on Wednesday that an agreement had already been reached on the amount: 151 million guilders, to be exact.

Oduber denied having reached any agreement and said he had informed the State Secretary in July that he had calculated a different amount. He believes Aruba is entitled to a higher percentage of the selling price of US $237 million. According to him, it had been agreed that further deliberations would take place on the level of civil servants and that the final amount would be determined in August.

After no agreement was reached on Plant N.V., the Aruban Government said the relationship between the island and the Netherlands had deteriorated. Also, Oduber ordered Aruba civil servants to stop participating in the negotiations for constitutional changes in the Netherlands Antilles.

Prime Minister of the Netherlands Antilles Emily de Jongh-Elhage told The Daily Herald she had taken notice of the media reports on the issue, but hadn’t received any official information from either Aruba or the Netherlands on the issue.

“I can’t really comment on it at this moment. Before Bijleveld-Schouten left for Aruba earlier this week, she told me that Aruba’s participation in the process has been very positive. I would like to remain positive on the issue,” she said. Constitutional Affairs Minister Roland Duncan was surprised when he was told what had happened. He was in Bonaire for a seminar on National Archives with the participation of all island territories and Aruba.

“You’re kidding!” Duncan said, after he was informed of Aruba’s decision to pull out of the constitutional change process.

He said he had no knowledge of what had transpired in Aruba and he would have to call Curaçao to find out. However, he expressed his concern about how Kingdom partners were dealing with each other when negotiating on several matters.

He said the Netherlands had been playing “hard ball” with the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. He also contended that the Netherlands Antilles hadn’t been treating Aruba fairly.

“Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles have a cooperation agreement on the Common Court of Justice. But, meanwhile, the Netherlands Antilles has negotiated a consensus Kingdom Law with the Netherlands on Justice without telling Aruba,” Duncan said.

He strongly believes that better communication with Aruba is needed. “I have just agreed with Oduber that the Ministerial working group between the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba would meet again in September after being inactive for I don’t know how many years.”

Asked about Aruba’s decision to involve the constitutional change process of the Netherlands Antilles in its dispute with the Netherlands, Duncan said it probably had been done for leverage. While he believes it’s not correct, Duncan admits that the Dutch constantly do the same.

“In the accord signed on Tuesday with Curaçao and the Central Government, the Dutch used the leverage of money to incorporate new conditions to the debt relief programme in the accord,” Duncan cited as an example.

Constitutional Affairs Commissioner of Curaçao Zita Jesus-Leito too wasn’t aware of what had transpired in Aruba. But, she said she wouldn’t let these types of disputes and occurrences derail her attention from the main issue, which is the constitutional change process for Curaçao.

“Now it’s Aruba that doesn’t want to talk to the Netherlands. A couple of weeks ago it was Saba that had put a stop to its talks with the Netherlands. I will inform myself on what is happening, but I can’t let these things take up my time and attention,” she said.

This newspaper was unable to contact Constitutional Affairs Commissioner Sarah Wescot-Williams for her comments on this latest development.
 



Copyright ©2006 The Daily Herald St. Maarten
E-mail Webmaster 84   
 
 
 


Thanks SuzieQ - do you have a link to this article?

Klaas, I'll go find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on September 01, 2007, 12:18:48 AM
Sovereignty issues -- the root to solving Natalee's plight. --IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: SuzieQ on September 01, 2007, 12:21:31 AM
Link to the article.

http://www.insideworld.com/r/Aruba_withdraws_from_constitutional_process,c0379c4da38e52f6bd113712df5be2cd,wid,528589.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on September 01, 2007, 12:22:46 AM
Link to the article.

http://www.insideworld.com/r/Aruba_withdraws_from_constitutional_process,c0379c4da38e52f6bd113712df5be2cd,wid,528589.html

GREAT!  Thank you!  That way if Red wants to do a front page post on it he'll have the link.   :wink:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: wreck on September 01, 2007, 12:23:22 AM
Sovereignty issues -- the root to solving Natalee's plight. --IMO
"route" instead of "root" :sad:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #679 8/26 - 8/31/2007
Post by: klaasend on September 01, 2007, 12:23:52 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub2/1LOCKED.gif)


Please move to NCD #680


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2103.0