Caylee Marie Anthony, 2, FL Missing since June 16-just reported by mother #82

[no rose colored glasses]

Everytime I even think about Conway's statement that the A's wanted casey to be a the private memorial...that they all wanted to be together as a family....my blood boils....such arrogance!! I have said all along this family never deserved this little child.  How can they be so damned insensitive. And why are they waiting to bury her or cremate her remains? All the experts say repeatedly there is nothing to see, nothing to autopsy!  I think they are waiting til the holidays are over so they will not risk not being the center of attention!!

I don't believe the Anthony's.  I don't believe their photo ops.  I don't believe any attorney that represents them.  They want a private memorial with Casey there so they can talk to her, get their ducks in a row.  I don't believe they are waiting until after the holidays so they can grieve....I believe they are using the remains of Caylee as a way to stall off any depositions/questioning sessions from LE or attorneys.

I am thinking the exact same thing.

[QuietMonkey]

My new avatar makes me cry. But I love it !!
Thanks CBB !!!

Awww, Cyn it's beautiful! 

[crazybabyborg]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

The bag was under a bush. Obviously critters were interested in the contents because bones were spread out over an acre. So, if the bag had brush, leaves, or dirt covering it a month ago where it had come to rest when the water receeded, then critters could have dug it out.

Since Casey chose to dispose of her child in this manner, the "burial" wasn't a fixed thing preserved to be intact. God Forbid she should have afforded Caylee's remains that kindness and respect.

[NewfieMonkey]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

Does the PI have any "proof" what date the video was taken?  You know, other than the time/date stamp on the camera which can be changed/tampered with.

[perriwinkle]

Question posted in Fashion forum.  PLease, go easy....

I was nice!  So were others!! 

 

What are you guys doing over there in the fashion forum anyway??    

Go check it out!  All are welcome!  It is a fun way to chat about fun things with our friends.  !

[CynInOregon]

Be back after I get some work done...  funny how they expect that of me around here.

[no rose colored glasses]

My new avatar makes me cry. But I love it !!
Thanks CBB !!!

Oh I love the angels, my mom who has passed away loved angels, your angels are so cute.

[Dolce]

Question posted in Fashion forum.  PLease, go easy....

I was nice!  So were others!! 

 

What are you guys doing over there in the fashion forum anyway??    

Getting dressed...we all can't be nakid now can we!?!!!

[Dolce]

Question posted in Fashion forum.  PLease, go easy....

I was nice!  So were others!! 

 

What are you guys doing over there in the fashion forum anyway??    

Go check it out!  All are welcome!  It is a fun way to chat about fun things with our friends.  !

Its a way I can finally be judgemental and not get yelled at too badly for it..LOL j/k
(Love you Sunny!!)
 

[faith1109]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

Does the PI have any "proof" what date the video was taken?  You know, other than the time/date stamp on the camera which can be changed/tampered with.

That is exactly what I was thinking when I first heard this info.  It is super easy to change the date stamp.  Also who has reviewed this tape to confirm the bag is not there.  There is so much on the "forest floor" (tree trunks, roots, debris, etc.) I would think it would take a very trained eye to confirm the absence of the bag as well as the exact location as it relates with the video and the original place the bag was found.

[no rose colored glasses]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

The bag was under a bush. Obviously critters were interested in the contents because bones were spread out over an acre. So, if the bag had brush, leaves, or dirt covering it a month ago where it had come to rest when the water receeded, then critters could have dug it out.

Since Casey chose to dispose of her child in this manner, the "burial" wasn't a fixed thing preserved to be intact. God Forbid she should have afforded Caylee's remains that kindness and respect.

The bag was hidden, so my question is how exactly did the meter man stumble upon it. It was so dense in there, and it wasn't in plain sight, so something just seems so off to me.

[higherhopes]

No Rose...did I send some mail yesterday?

I don't know if you did or not, now I want to know. That pic of the CSI guy I want to know what he is doing, that pic jumped out at me. I'm guessing it is the back of the Anthony's fence.

I believe like it was said here that he was just making sure noone tried to gain access to the property by coming over the fence, or noone inside tried to get rid of anything by throwing it over the fence, but it does look funny.........oh and if I didnt give you mail, please get my addy from klaas or another mod when you have time, so I can send you some info....Thanks

[crazybabyborg]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

Does the PI have any "proof" what date the video was taken?  You know, other than the time/date stamp on the camera which can be changed/tampered with.

WHOA! Now, that's an excellent question!!!!

I don't trust anyone connected to the Anthony's!!!

[Keepthefaith]

I'm currently listening to all the jailhouse interviews.At what point did the Anthony's become aware they were being recorded and the tapes would be released.Monkey's..TIA

[Keepthefaith]

What is the story behind the fence?

[SunnyinTX]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

Does the PI have any "proof" what date the video was taken?  You know, other than the time/date stamp on the camera which can be changed/tampered with.

I haven't a clue...but as you said the time and date stamp can easily be tampered with

[perriwinkle]

OK,
First of all, I can't stand JVM taking over for NG.  She is not informed and also is kinda for the defense in a lot of ways. 
Next, I thought it was interesting that Kathy Belich basically said that the video tape was very short and only included a small area of the crime scene.  It sounds like it was a limited shot, just enough to say " Oh look.  Nothing here"
Why was he there in the first place?  WHat does he know that he is not telling.
That body was there from the beginning.  It has been spread all over the place, even under the ground.  It is a shame!  But I feel that the investigators will be able to prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. 
I feel bad for KRONK and that he got in the middle of it.  However, if he is involved, he better get caught. 

CBB- I agree.  WHen is the truth ever going to come out and not be obstructed here?  A little girl is dead.  Can't anyone finally tell the truth? 

 

[cheeky monkey]

I'm so sorry to do this off topic but I had to comment.  N2WISHN you're makeup is WOW.  You look really ready for New Years Eve.

Cheeky,I saw Brandi had you a new avi over in the lounge.

OOH thank you.  I had to run out but I'm going to look now.

[Dolce]

Ms. Klaas...nanner please!  TIA

[JodyO]

Unless this PI knew the exact spot of where to film and closed in on it, I agree, debris could have been covering it or anything else.

I can't see pens or bright yellow "post its" on my desk half the time, and I'm sitting at it!

( I have papers that need my attention, but I am often distracted by a bunch of monkeys!! )

I agree, that video (without even seeing it)can't prove she wasn't there. It can only prove the body/bag was not visible to the "naked eye". It was a month before, maybe it was still covered, either by water or debris. Just because he scanned the area with the video camera, doesn't mean you can see everything. I watched the video of the A's backyard with Greta last week, and it was hard to make out alot of the things that were in the cameras view.
Another thing, what was he even doing out there, in that supposed exact area? WHY? I think it's very suspicious he happened to video tape there. I think someone has some splaining to do!!!

The bag was under a bush. Obviously critters were interested in the contents because bones were spread out over an acre. So, if the bag had brush, leaves, or dirt covering it a month ago where it had come to rest when the water receeded, then critters could have dug it out.

Since Casey chose to dispose of her child in this manner, the "burial" wasn't a fixed thing preserved to be intact. God Forbid she should have afforded Caylee's remains that kindness and respect.

A "burial" - hot, dirty, hard, messy work. Casey might have broken a fingernail, gotten blisters, etc., digging even a shallow grave for her possession, Caylee, so it was much easier to simply discard her like yesterday's trash.