Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: Nut44x4 on January 23, 2009, 05:55:19 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 23, 2009, 05:55:19 PM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 06:46:18 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/ScreenShot003a.jpg)

TRUTH and JUSTICE for NATALEE!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 06:50:47 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/ScreenShot003a.jpg)

TRUTH and JUSTICE for NATALEE!!!!!

AMEN.           STAY FOCUSED.........THE PERSISTENCE IS WHERE IT'S AT...............


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2009, 06:53:04 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/happy/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 06:53:41 PM
Somehow, I knew Janet would be first.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 27, 2009, 06:53:47 PM
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 06:56:34 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/happy/5.gif)

(http://bestsmileys.com/happy/5.gif)

Hi MuffyBee

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 06:58:14 PM
Somehow, I knew Janet would be first.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

However ... it is not has much fun without Robots attempting to beat me to it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I thrive on competition.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 07:01:44 PM
Somehow, I knew Janet would be first.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

However ... it is not has much fun without Robots attempting to beat me to it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I thrive on competition.

Janet



Thank you for bringing over TM's post of Natalee's picture. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 27, 2009, 07:02:18 PM
Here!  Trying to catch up since my ride home.

Thanks for  the pictures of Natalee.  I love those pictures of her.  We need to be reminded often lately of her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 07:02:57 PM
Somehow, I knew Janet would be first.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

However ... it is not has much fun without Robots attempting to beat me to it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I thrive on competition.

Janet



Thank you for bringing over TM's post of Natalee's picture. 

Yes, thank you Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::

Edited my typo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 27, 2009, 07:03:46 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: SS on January 27, 2009, 07:04:03 PM
 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 07:06:19 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

He was here a few nights ago with news.  I enjoy his posts too!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2009, 07:06:22 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

Looks like caesu last posted in Natalee threads 1/19, and other threads 1/22. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 07:07:08 PM
Somehow, I knew Janet would be first.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

However ... it is not has much fun without Robots attempting to beat me to it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I thrive on competition.

Janet



Thank you for bringing over TM's post of Natalee's picture. 

You are welcome.

texasmom ... brings us all back to what it is all about.

Thank you texasmom.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 27, 2009, 07:07:39 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 27, 2009, 07:07:53 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

Looks like caesu last posted in Natalee threads 1/19, and other threads 1/22. 

Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 27, 2009, 07:08:49 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.


I am hoping for more posts on Peter R de Vries winning the Personality of the Year award, complete with lots of PHOTOS for my screensaver!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My screensaver is very important!


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 07:10:11 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 27, 2009, 07:11:02 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

What?  Is there a point to that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 27, 2009, 07:14:58 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

What?  Is there a point to that?

Point being, if you miss his posts, you can surely read them there, can't you? Just sayin....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 27, 2009, 07:18:52 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

What?  Is there a point to that?

Point being, if you miss his posts, you can surely read them there, can't you? Just sayin....
 

I don't know.  Ask Seamonkey.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 07:19:59 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 27, 2009, 07:21:32 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

What?  Is there a point to that?

Point being, if you miss his posts, you can surely read them there, can't you? Just sayin....
 

I don't know.  Ask Seamonkey.

?   Why Seamonkey? Does she want to see his posts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 07:22:56 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.

I believe Kermit will return after a relaxing trip to Janet's pond,as well as a second helping of that ShoeFly pie! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 27, 2009, 07:23:16 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

What?  Is there a point to that?

Point being, if you miss his posts, you can surely read them there, can't you? Just sayin....
 

I don't know.  Ask Seamonkey.

?   Why Seamonkey? Does she want to see his posts?

You need to find someone else to play with.  I'm not interested, AC.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 07:24:33 PM
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 27, 2009, 07:24:59 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.

I believe Kermit will return after a relaxing trip to Janet's pond,as well as a second helping of that ShoeFly pie! ::MonkeyCool::

Doesn't that pond sound delightful? (better than 15 inches of snow, grrrrr)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 27, 2009, 07:28:23 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.


I am hoping for more posts on Peter R de Vries winning the Personality of the Year award, complete with lots of PHOTOS for my screensaver!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My screensaver is very important!


.

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.  (nice face)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 07:30:25 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.


I am hoping for more posts on Peter R de Vries winning the Personality of the Year award, complete with lots of PHOTOS for my screensaver!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My screensaver is very important!


.

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.  (nice face)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Peter_Devries_1a.jpg)


 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 07:31:42 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.

I believe Kermit will return after a relaxing trip to Janet's pond,as well as a second helping of that ShoeFly pie! ::MonkeyCool::

Rubarb/strawberry pie will have to suffice.  By mistake ... I fed our guests from Quebec (eldest son's inlaws) Kermit's shoefly pie last night.  They smothered it with whipping cream and wolfed it down.  While whiping their mouths with a napkin after cleaning their plates ... I was informed that it tasted better than their Christmas mincemeat pie.   The ingredience  even gave them a "buzz".

I smiled sweetly and ... said thank you.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 27, 2009, 07:33:21 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.

I believe Kermit will return after a relaxing trip to Janet's pond,as well as a second helping of that ShoeFly pie! ::MonkeyCool::

Rubarb/strawberry pie will have to suffice.  By mistake ... I fed our guests from Quebec (eldest son's inlaws) Kermit's shoefly pie last night.  They smothered it with whipping cream and wolfed it down.  While whiping their mouths with a napkin after cleaning their plates ... I was informed that it tasted better than their Christmas mincemeat pie.   The ingredience  even gave them a "buzz".

I smiled sweetly and ... said thank you.

Janet

 
  ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 07:34:12 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.

I believe Kermit will return after a relaxing trip to Janet's pond,as well as a second helping of that ShoeFly pie! ::MonkeyCool::

Rubarb/strawberry pie will have to suffice.  By mistake ... I fed our guests from Quebec (eldest son's inlaws) Kermit's shoefly pie last night.  They smothered it with whipping cream and wolfed it down.  While whiping their mouths with a napkin after cleaning their plates ... I was informed that it tasted better than their Christmas mincemeat pie.   The ingredience  even gave them a "buzz".

I smiled sweetly and ... said thank you.

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 27, 2009, 07:34:14 PM
Thanks, TXMom,

That one is definitely worth adding to my collection!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 07:34:38 PM
Just wanted to say that I think Monkeys have been
very kind and considerate today, considering all of the
accuations and misinformation thrown at them today.

I believe Kermit will return after a relaxing trip to Janet's pond,as well as a second helping of that ShoeFly pie! ::MonkeyCool::

Kermit may need two helping of pie.  I would!
I fear that I would have flown off the handle many times
with all of the insults that Frog has endured.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 27, 2009, 07:35:00 PM
I personally don't understand why it's OK to make up stuff and pass it on just to see who spreads it (so they say), but proving who said what to whom by posting an email is such a big deal.  I work in IT and much of work is done via email.  Emails are used all the time to settle disagreements as to who agreed to what and the rule is, if you don't want everyone to know don't put it in an email, becuase you never know who's going to get it.

I don't know who CAPS is and don't much care.  IMHO he lead us on and let us down.  Period.  Kyle is either a liar or stupid.  Those defending him, need to grow up.  He can either defend himself or not.  Comments from others defending him do nothing, but further my negative opinions.  Same goes for those who try to bash Kermit for being wrong, but nitpick at her posts rather than the real meat of the issue.  Kyle is either a liar or stupid.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 07:35:03 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 07:38:32 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

CAn't you see his posts in Chat n Grumble?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Art ... I will just tippy toe away.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 07:39:24 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'm doing a dance to the Snow Gods of the Fraser Valley for that one! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2009, 07:46:18 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'm doing a dance to the Snow Gods of the Fraser Valley for that one! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Very impressive, especially given there have been 11 to 14 monkeys and 19 to 21 "guests" here to watch.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Really though, I hope to see this thread get back to discussing the Natalee Holloway case.  That's why we are all here, right?  Right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 07:46:49 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 07:49:05 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

Keepthefaith is a girlmonkey? ::MonkeyShocked::
I have thought all this time Keepthefaith was a boymonkey. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 07:50:21 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Keepthefaith is a girlmonkey? ::MonkeyShocked::
I have thought all this time Keepthefaith was a boymonkey. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 07:50:24 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

Keepthefaith is a girlmonkey? ::MonkeyShocked::
I have thought all this time Keepthefaith was a boymonkey. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I hope not.  I am VERY friendly with her.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 07:50:47 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

Keepthefaith is a girlmonkey? ::MonkeyShocked::
I have thought all this time Keepthefaith was a boymonkey. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Should i do a countdown to reveal the sex of Keepthefaith! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 07:52:51 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet


It was meant for everyone and not directed to you and your 'pie'.  ::MonkeyWink::

I do not have the power to ban, nor do I wish to have it.  I would just like the discussion to stay close to Natalee and the case, without too much outside the cage reference & tension...if that makes sense. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2009, 07:55:04 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/signs11/3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 07:56:15 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet

Keepthefaith is a girlmonkey? ::MonkeyShocked::
I have thought all this time Keepthefaith was a boymonkey. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Should i do a countdown to reveal the sex of Keepthefaith! ::MonkeyLaugh::

I even have a picture in my mind of what you look like in real life.
But since we aren't supposed to post real life info.  I won't tell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2009, 07:57:19 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/signs11/3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 07:57:48 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 27, 2009, 08:01:43 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.


I am hoping for more posts on Peter R de Vries winning the Personality of the Year award, complete with lots of PHOTOS for my screensaver!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My screensaver is very important!


.

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU.  (nice face)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Peter_Devries_1a.jpg)


 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049 :smt049


WOW.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 27, 2009, 08:02:40 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I think the coast is clear now...I went back to try to wade through the end of the last thread to see what was being discussed.  I kept getting lost. I can see where we were talking about Caps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 08:06:00 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 08:06:34 PM
::MonkeyNoNo::

Let's not take our focus off topic. 

I apologize 2NJSons_Mom.  I responded to Keepthefaith prior to reading your post.

Keepthefairth is such a back influence.  Ban her!

Janet


It was meant for everyone and not directed to you and your 'pie'.  ::MonkeyWink::

I do not have the power to ban, nor do I wish to have it.  I would just like the discussion to stay close to Natalee and the case, without too much outside the cage reference & tension...if that makes sense. 

I understand 2NJSons_Mom.  It was just my attempt at relieving some tension.  I found today very stressful on the forum.  I had to post what was in my heart but ... when I consider the division ... the wide gulf ... that has development between Monkeys on the CAP/ Kyle/ Persistence issues ... it is so troubling.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:09:43 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.

Well hopefully Kermit has more information in regards to the Jossy/Silvetti relationship!I know you still have Jossy in high regards Janet but the verdict is still out for me.I pray that all intentions from Jossy are good but just don't know!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 27, 2009, 08:09:59 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.


Didn't Jossy conduct a search right before the Persistence arrived, one at his own expense and some how affiliated with the man from Texas who claimed to have some sort of gadget that could detect human remains?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:11:18 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.


Didn't Jossy conduct a search right before the Persistence arrived, one at his own expense and some how affiliated with the man from Texas who claimed to have some sort of gadget that could detect human remains?



Interesting.Who is that man and how did Jossy come to know him?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 08:14:00 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.

Well hopefully Kermit has more information in regards to the Jossy/Silvetti relationship!I know you still have Jossy in high regards Janet but the verdict is still out for me.I pray that all intentions from Jossy are good but just don't know!

KEEPTHEFAITH

Keepthefaith ... I am having second thoughts when I consider the CAPS/ John Silvetti/ Jossy Mansur connection in regards to the pond witness.  Then when I consider Eduardo Mansur's involvement.  Jossy claims his son spent ever day on the Persistence except the day when the contents of the cage/trap were recovered by the Aruban divers.

I hope I am wrong.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 08:16:06 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.


Didn't Jossy conduct a search right before the Persistence arrived, one at his own expense and some how affiliated with the man from Texas who claimed to have some sort of gadget that could detect human remains?



I don't think so.  He kept talking of it.  Then something went wrong
with the man or his machine.  That is when Silvetti and Scheafer entered
the picture and got in touch with Tim Miller.  I think Jossy set it up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 27, 2009, 08:16:44 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.

Well hopefully Kermit has more information in regards to the Jossy/Silvetti relationship!I know you still have Jossy in high regards Janet but the verdict is still out for me.I pray that all intentions from Jossy are good but just don't know!

KEEPTHEFAITH

I already asked Kermit it Jossy was innocently or on purpose injected himself into this nightmare.  She said the jury was still out on that and that is all she would say.  So don't think you will get anymore info from her on that subject.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:18:29 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.

Well hopefully Kermit has more information in regards to the Jossy/Silvetti relationship!I know you still have Jossy in high regards Janet but the verdict is still out for me.I pray that all intentions from Jossy are good but just don't know!

KEEPTHEFAITH

Keepthefaith ... I am having second thoughts when I consider the CAPS/ John Silvetti/ Jossy Mansur connection in regards to the pond witness.  Then when I consider Eduardo Mansur's involvement.  Jossy claims his son spent ever day on the Persistence except the day when the contents of the cage/trap were recovered by the Aruban divers.

I hope I am wrong.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

I've said it before.There has got to be one soul on theat island.Maybe not?Eduardo getting the bulldozer for the dump,Sarah Mansur(Van Der Startten's secretary),Eric Mansur helped on searches,Serge Mansur(Is he with Ahata or ata?)..I just have a problem with a family of that stature,with that many ties to the case,Not knowing what happened!It baffles me to no end!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 27, 2009, 08:18:32 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.


Didn't Jossy conduct a search right before the Persistence arrived, one at his own expense and some how affiliated with the man from Texas who claimed to have some sort of gadget that could detect human remains?



Interesting.Who is that man and how did Jossy come to know him?


I don't recall his name.  He had the gadget in Aruba at one time and was trying to interest Dave Holloway in it.  I think it was supposed to work on some vague not particularly scientific principle of locating concentrations of calcuim as in bones and human teeth.

This is all from memory only and I could be wrong about his being involved with Jossy's search but that is how I recall it happened.
Was separate from Persistence.

Now I would like to know the area it searched just for the sake of knowing.  Was it the trap area or where.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:21:22 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.

Well hopefully Kermit has more information in regards to the Jossy/Silvetti relationship!I know you still have Jossy in high regards Janet but the verdict is still out for me.I pray that all intentions from Jossy are good but just don't know!

KEEPTHEFAITH

I already asked Kermit it Jossy was innocently or on purpose injected himself into this nightmare.  She said the jury was still out on that and that is all she would say.  So don't think you will get anymore info from her on that subject.

Maybe there will be more to come on that issue.I pray!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:37:12 PM
Tamikosmom


"SS ... I do have a clue who CAPS is.  However ... my research has revealed that he is at the very least a troll ... a troll that has been placed on the forum to distract from the truth.  I have shared that research with you to not avail.

The following posts uphold Dave Holloway ... upholding Julia Renfro in her contentin that Beth Holloway lied as well as undermining Jug Twitty and Beth Holloway.

SS ... this reeks of Mark Purcell through and through.  If CAPS and Mark Purcell are not one of the same ... then somebody else with connections to the AHATA is behind the scenes pulling the strings.

Think about it.  The AHATA has been behind the misinformation compaign to distract from the truth encompassing the Natalee Holloway case from the getgo.  The tourism minister announced the members of the AHATA were moved to the ALE to assist in the investigation.

Another point.  Why was CAPS when he first began posting ...  CAPS who is revered to have so much inside inside case information ... aware of the identity of Natalee Holloway stepfather who was in the media spotlight along side of Beth from the getgo.

Janet

++++++

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »

need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »

my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:38:45 PM
Tamikosmom


"SS ... I do have a clue who CAPS is.  However ... my research has revealed that he is at the very least a troll ... a troll that has been placed on the forum to distract from the truth.  I have shared that research with you to not avail.

The following posts uphold Dave Holloway ... upholding Julia Renfro in her contentin that Beth Holloway lied as well as undermining Jug Twitty and Beth Holloway.

SS ... this reeks of Mark Purcell through and through.  If CAPS and Mark Purcell are not one of the same ... then somebody else with connections to the AHATA is behind the scenes pulling the strings.
Think about it.  The AHATA has been behind the misinformation compaign to distract from the truth encompassing the Natalee Holloway case from the getgo.  The tourism minister announced the members of the AHATA were moved to the ALE to assist in the investigation.

Another point.  Why was CAPS when he first began posting ...  CAPS who is revered to have so much inside inside case information ... aware of the identity of Natalee Holloway stepfather who was in the media spotlight along side of Beth from the getgo.

Janet

++++++

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »

need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »

my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749


When they take people from Ahata and make them part of the police force there are MAJOR PROBLEMS!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:41:27 PM
Tamikosmom


"SS ... I do have a clue who CAPS is.  However ... my research has revealed that he is at the very least a troll ... a troll that has been placed on the forum to distract from the truth.  I have shared that research with you to not avail.

The following posts uphold Dave Holloway ... upholding Julia Renfro in her contentin that Beth Holloway lied as well as undermining Jug Twitty and Beth Holloway.

SS ... this reeks of Mark Purcell through and through.  If CAPS and Mark Purcell are not one of the same ... then somebody else with connections to the AHATA is behind the scenes pulling the strings.
Think about it.  The AHATA has been behind the misinformation compaign to distract from the truth encompassing the Natalee Holloway case from the getgo.  The tourism minister announced the members of the AHATA were moved to the ALE to assist in the investigation.

Another point.  Why was CAPS when he first began posting ...  CAPS who is revered to have so much inside inside case information ... aware of the identity of Natalee Holloway stepfather who was in the media spotlight along side of Beth from the getgo.

Janet

++++++

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »

need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »

my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749


When they take people from Ahata and make them part of the police force there are MAJOR PROBLEMS!!!!!!

You involve the AHATA in the Murder investigation of an American girl??This has DISINFORMATION SPECIALISTS written all over it!

ARUBA IS SICK,SICK,SICK..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: caesu on January 27, 2009, 08:43:40 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

there isn't much news in the Dutch media about Aruba / Natalee lately.

only a few things, some already mentioned here:

1. Peter R. de Vries was attacked on Saturday by Steve Brown.
Quote
Peter R. de Vries attacked in car

Published: Saturday 24 January 2009 20:38 UTC

The journalist and broadcaster Peter R. de Vries has been injured after being attacked in his car by former drug dealer Steve Brown. Mr De Vries says he was travelling through Amsterdam and had stopped at a traffic light when Mr Brown pulled the driver's door open and began to kick and punch him. Mr De Vries said he could not fight back because he was held fast by his seat belt. Bystanders managed to free him, at which point Mr Brown ran away. Among other injuries, Mr De Vries suffered a cut to his jaw.

Mr Brown has disputed this version of the story and says that Mr De Vries attacked him.

The two men have been opponents ever since Peter de Vries filmed the former drug dealer with a hidden camera for one of his television programmes. Since that time, the two men have come to blows on three separate occasions.
http://www.radionetherlands.nl/news/zijlijn/6148472/Peter-R-de-Vries-attacked-in-car

2. Peter R. de Vries won TV personality of the Year Award and another Award for the Joran van der Sloot of last year:
(http://images2-telegraaf.nl/multimedia/archive/00601/peter_jpg_601601i.jpg)(http://www.peterrdevries.nl/images/beeldgeluid08-5.jpg)
(you can see his black eye from the attack by Steve Brown)
http://www.telegraaf.nl/prive/3097296/__Peter_R._TV_Persoonlijkheid_van_het_Jaar__.html?p=4,1

3. in March new Peter R. de Vries broadcasts start.

4. Geert Wilders, from the PVV political party will be prosecuted for his anti-islam opinion.
this is causing quite a big outrage both in politics and in the media.
as it seems like the freedom of speech is under threat.

however i just cannot not believe Wilders will be convicted.
i don't agree with Wilders on many issues, but he should be able to say whatever he wants.

Hero Brinkman is also of the PVV party.
Quote
A member of parliament in the Netherlands who has been charged with "insulting" Muslims says he fears he will be found guilty and sent to prison in only a few months.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,481665,00.html
Quote
"The ruling of the Amsterdam appeal court that the OM (Public Prosecutor's Office) has to prosecute Geert Wilders has had a clear positive effect on the size of the electoral support for the PVV," according to De Hond. With 20 seats, the PVV is the same size as the conservatives (VVD) this week. "This is the highest score for the PVV since September 2007."
http://www.nisnews.nl/public/270109_1.htm

5. the organisation who filed charges against Wilders is now saying that Brinkman also should be prosecuted for his opinions about the Antilles/Aruba.

i don't give them much chance, but you never know with this crazy ruling about prosecuting Wilders.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 27, 2009, 08:49:36 PM
Has caesu been around lately?  I always like to see some of the news he/she posts.

there isn't much news in the Dutch media about Aruba / Natalee lately.

only a few things, some already mentioned here:

1. Peter R. de Vries was attacked on Saturday by Steve Brown.
Quote
Peter R. de Vries attacked in car

Published: Saturday 24 January 2009 20:38 UTC

The journalist and broadcaster Peter R. de Vries has been injured after being attacked in his car by former drug dealer Steve Brown. Mr De Vries says he was travelling through Amsterdam and had stopped at a traffic light when Mr Brown pulled the driver's door open and began to kick and punch him. Mr De Vries said he could not fight back because he was held fast by his seat belt. Bystanders managed to free him, at which point Mr Brown ran away. Among other injuries, Mr De Vries suffered a cut to his jaw.

Mr Brown has disputed this version of the story and says that Mr De Vries attacked him.

The two men have been opponents ever since Peter de Vries filmed the former drug dealer with a hidden camera for one of his television programmes. Since that time, the two men have come to blows on three separate occasions.
http://www.radionetherlands.nl/news/zijlijn/6148472/Peter-R-de-Vries-attacked-in-car

2. Peter R. de Vries won TV personality of the Year Award and another Award for the Joran van der Sloot of last year:
(http://images2-telegraaf.nl/multimedia/archive/00601/peter_jpg_601601i.jpg)(http://www.peterrdevries.nl/images/beeldgeluid08-5.jpg)
(you can see his black eye from the attack by Steve Brown)
http://www.telegraaf.nl/prive/3097296/__Peter_R._TV_Persoonlijkheid_van_het_Jaar__.html?p=4,1

3. in March new Peter R. de Vries broadcasts start.

4. Geert Wilders, from the PVV political party will be prosecuted for his anti-islam opinion.
this is causing quite a big outrage both in politics and in the media.
as it seems like the freedom of speech is under threat.

however i just cannot not believe Wilders will be convicted.
i don't agree with Wilders on many issues, but he should be able to say whatever he wants.

Hero Brinkman is also of the PVV party.
Quote
A member of parliament in the Netherlands who has been charged with "insulting" Muslims says he fears he will be found guilty and sent to prison in only a few months.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,481665,00.html
Quote
"The ruling of the Amsterdam appeal court that the OM (Public Prosecutor's Office) has to prosecute Geert Wilders has had a clear positive effect on the size of the electoral support for the PVV," according to De Hond. With 20 seats, the PVV is the same size as the conservatives (VVD) this week. "This is the highest score for the PVV since September 2007."
http://www.nisnews.nl/public/270109_1.htm

5. the organisation who filed charges against Wilders is now saying that Brinkman also should be prosecuted for his opinions about the Antilles/Aruba.

i don't give them much chance, but you never know with this crazy ruling about prosecuting Wilders.

Just "WOW".  I know, I know, get back on topic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 08:50:34 PM
Have i read somewhere that Paulus has a brother in the Govt. in the Netherlands???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 27, 2009, 08:51:54 PM
Thanks Caesu!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 27, 2009, 08:53:14 PM
Thanks for the news recap, caesu.  I was hoping some other politicians would get behind Brinkman on the Aruba issue.  But, I understand politics is politics. 

I hope you are right about the chances that neither one of them will actually be convicted of anything.  Without freedom of speech in many countries it will be a scarry world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 09:24:03 PM
Thanks for the news recap, caesu.  I was hoping some other politicians would get behind Brinkman on the Aruba issue.  But, I understand politics is politics. 

I hope you are right about the chances that neither one of them will actually be convicted of anything.  Without freedom of speech in many countries it will be a scarry world.

I agree truthseeker2.

Thank you caesu.

I fear Hero Brinkman will be next.  Aruba must be appeased.

My youngest son's Dutch American FIL is so troubled in regards to the Islamic appeasement that is taking place in his beloved homeland ... the Islamic appeasement at the expense of democratic feedom of speech.

I viewed the film clip Fitna.  The truth was exposed.

Janet

+++++++

Dutch Lawmaker, Charged With Insulting Islam, Fears Prison Sentence
Thursday, January 22, 2009 | FoxNews.com
By Joel Mowbray


A member of parliament in the Netherlands who has been charged with "insulting" Muslims says he fears he will be found guilty and sent to prison in only a few months.

An appeals court on Wednesday overturned a previous decision by prosecutors not to charge Geert Wilders, and ordered that he stand trial.

"The decision of the court today was so strong that there is a real chance unfortunately that there will be a guilty verdict," Wilders told FOXNews.com. "In fact, it was so bluntly motivated that it already looks like a verdict instead of just ordering the public prosecutor to start a trial."

Wilders, who produced a controversial film that was highly critical of the Koran last year, says he faces a maximum of two years in prison if convicted. He said he had expected to be charged, and he has retained legal assistance from a U.S.-based nonprofit to help him defend himself.

Prosecutors initially declined last year to charge the right wing politician after he issued his short film, "Fitna," which juxtaposes Koranic verses over footage of violence committed by Islamic terrorists.

But, the Netherlands allows private citizens to petition the courts to compel prosecution. In Wilders' case, eight parties, including a politician from an opposing party, asked the courts to force prosecutors to bring criminal charges.

A three-judge appeals panel on Wednesday ruled that Wilders' insults to Islam were so egregious that the principle of free speech was not sufficient defense.

"The court considers [Wilders' film] so insulting for Muslims that it is in the public interest to prosecute Wilders," a summary of the court's decision said. The court explained that Wilders' claims in "Fitna" and other media statements were "one-sided generalizations ... which can amount to inciting hatred."

Wilders on Wednesday defiantly stood by the public statements that could put him in prison.

"I lost my freedom already four and a half years ago in October 2004, when my 24-hour police protection started because of threats by Muslims in Holland and abroad to kill me," he said.

So of course I don't want to go to jail as a criminal, but I don't fear losing my freedom since I already lost my freedom in 2004."

For several months, Wilders has been receiving pro bono assistance from a U.S.-based nonprofit called the Legal Project, whose aim is to protect free speech in what it says is a worldwide campaign to silence critics of "militant" Islam.

Middle East scholar Daniel Pipes founded the Legal Project following a slew of cases in which authors and activists were sued for alleged hate speech against Muslims and Islam, including several cases in the United States.

"The Legal Project helped me when I was in the United States, arranging meetings with important legal scholars and elected officials," Wilders told FOXNews.com. "They also helped bring public attention to my case, which hopefully will help me raise money for my legal defense fund."

Click here for more on Leagal Project.

Brooke Goldstein, a human rights attorney and director of the Legal Project, said Wilders' case indicates that free speech is increasingly under assault. "Geert Wilders could be going to jail for making admittedly harsh criticisms of Islam that actually echo statements made by Muslims," Goldstein said.

"Even if he prevails at trial, the damage to free speech will be done. Who wants to risk the time, cost and public harassment of a criminal trial?"

Goldstein said criminal prosecutions for hate speech or incitement are unlikely in the U.S. because of the First Amendment, but she said the mere threat of a lawsuit can stifle speech, especially when they concern corporations that must focus on turning a profit.

Even individuals participating in what they consider basic free-speech activities can find themselves in legal crosshairs, Goldstein said.

One Legal Project client is former CIA official and NYPD counterterrorism consultant Bruce Tefft, who was sued by a Muslim police officer for "workplace harassment" after he allegedly sent anti-Muslim e-mails to a voluntary recipient list of police officers.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,481665,00.html




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 10:49:57 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 27, 2009, 10:52:32 PM
I am off to bed.  G'nite all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 10:53:19 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 10:54:03 PM
I am off to bed.  G'nite all.

Good Night Blue Moon.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 10:58:07 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we?I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 10:58:32 PM
I am off to bed.  G'nite all.

GoodNight BlueMoon! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 27, 2009, 10:58:57 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 11:02:11 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



I am still waiting.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:02:24 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we?I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

Was this all a ploy to bring the Frog back out??? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:02:43 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:04:08 PM

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #937 on: Today at 04:58:09 PM »
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920
So, what is your point????

My Point is you are incorrect and I stopped reading or respoding at your third lie.
It's superfluous to do so.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 11:04:59 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:05:03 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we?I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

Was this all a ploy to bring the Frog back out??? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Mrs. Janet gave my shoefly pie away ---- to strangers!

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:05:57 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

squirt

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:06:36 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:07:11 PM
OK.Is it all clear again?Where was the discussion at before it got derailed again?Tim Miller was approached by Louis and John!CapsLockWizard is friends with Clyde Burke,as well as has an uncle in the OM.If those two are true i think he's a safe as can be.

BUMP

I believe it had to be Jossy that sent Silvetti and Scheafer to Tim Miller.
Jossy had talked about an ocean search for some time and then
suddenly S&S show up.  Then Jossy's son is on board the Persistence
the whole time.


Didn't Jossy conduct a search right before the Persistence arrived, one at his own expense and some how affiliated with the man from Texas who claimed to have some sort of gadget that could detect human remains?



Interesting.Who is that man and how did Jossy come to know him?


I don't recall his name.  He had the gadget in Aruba at one time and was trying to interest Dave Holloway in it.  I think it was supposed to work on some vague not particularly scientific principle of locating concentrations of calcuim as in bones and human teeth.

This is all from memory only and I could be wrong about his being involved with Jossy's search but that is how I recall it happened.
Was separate from Persistence.

Now I would like to know the area it searched just for the sake of knowing.  Was it the trap area or where.

I remember that. It's in Dave's book I think.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 11:08:38 PM
Liberty Travel has a campaign of advertising currently going on.  I've seen two commercials tonight on NBC.  One of the Caribbean locations is Aruba...at 'up to 75% off'.   Note:  when I copied the verbiage presented, many prices and rooms not seen were visible.....I snipped them for brevity.

It stood out because it was the largest percentage off in the commercial for locations advertised.  Just thinking of the travel shows coming up.

*************************

Divi Village Golf & Beach Resort
  4 nights from $585*
+ taxes/fees   
 
Save 75% in Aruba!
This casual resort with an All-Inclusive option has a 9-hole golf course, pool complex, 30-foot beachfront rock-climbing wall, fitness center, and kids' club. The tennis courts are lighted.

Includes round-trip airfare
Hotel Transfers
Accommodations for 4 nights
Save 75%

Book by 2/9/2009

--snipped--
 



Save 75% in Aruba!
This casual resort with an All-Inclusive option has a 9-hole golf course, pool complex, 30-foot beachfront rock-climbing wall, fitness center, and kids' club. The tennis courts are lighted.

Includes round-trip airfare
Hotel Transfers
Accommodations for 4 nights
Save 75%

Book by 2/9/2009

 
Aruba is located deep in the Caribbean, just about 15 miles north of Venezuela. It is only 20 miles long and 6 miles wide, making it the smallest of the Dutch Caribbean, or "ABC" Islands (Aruba, Bonaire, and Curaçao). Aruba became a separate country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1986, yet the island retains much of its early Dutch character. Despite its diminutive size, Aruba offers every Caribbean delight imaginable from water sports, to casinos, colonial heritage, forts, serene white-sand beaches, and so on. Blessed with pleasant trade winds and a nearly rain-free climate, Aruba is an island of enchanting contrasts. On the western shore, soft powder beaches fringed with palm trees slope gently to the warm, turquoise sea. Meanwhile, the island's interior is a desert-like landscape punctuated by divi-divi trees and the occasional pastel-colored cottage.

No large mammals populate Aruba but you can expect to see a great variety of small lizards and geckoes, as well as hundreds of species of local and migrating birds. The Bubali Bird Sanctuary near Palm Beach is home and refuge for many of these creatures. With the island's friendly people, beaches, well-organized tourist industry, and perpetually sunny climate, Aruba claims one of the highest rates of repeat visitors in the Caribbean!
 
--snipped--

© Liberty Travel, Inc. 2001-2009, All rights reserved. 

http://ww2.libertytravel.com/offerdetail.jsp?offerid=38089&utm_source=Homepage&utm_medium=Offers&utm_campaign=Top_Travel_Picks&leadsourceid=#
   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:09:06 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we?I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

Was this all a ploy to bring the Frog back out??? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Mrs. Janet gave my shoefly pie away ---- to strangers!

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Not just any strangers.  French Canadian strangers who eat little frog legs as a delicacy.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:09:26 PM
I'm actually not going to stay.

I am locked and loaded.
Waiting for the poop to fly.
heh heh.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 11:10:02 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

squirt

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:10:42 PM


Not just any strangers.  French Canadian strangers who eat little frog legs as a delicacy.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet

I remember them.
Tell em to try chicken next time!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:11:38 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet




Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 11:13:20 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 11:13:24 PM
I'm actually not going to stay.

I am locked and loaded.
Waiting for the poop to fly.
heh heh.




I just knew Lala's would be here tonight to defend her e-mail.
I am so disappointed.

What's up with SS?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 11:13:25 PM
Well, I sure don't have frog timing.    ::MonkeyEek::     ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 27, 2009, 11:14:42 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

AND you know I'm just sitting here waiting.....
for the next onslaught of incorrect information.
fingers tapping on the desk......
emails ready.....
I just think we better all stand clear when the poop flies.

I gotta go.

BUT trust me....

I'm ready.
Don't anyone laugh now
after the explosion of poop.

Be kind.
Offer some delicate spray
And perhaps depends.

Cuz trust me on this.
I've got the goods!
LOL
AND it wasn't no SET UP to find out who her informant was. tards.
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:20:36 PM
Are you OK Janet? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:21:10 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet




Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Thanks Keepthefaith.  However ... as curious as I was ... I was going to let the issue drop. 

It is so weird ... it had never entered my mind that you were not a girl monkey.  However ... today when I referred to you as a "her" the majority of the forum spoke up.  They had always assumed you were a boy monkey.  Somethings I pick up on immediate and others ....

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I can just imagine the whispers behind the scenes for the past couple of month with me constantly giving you all those hugs.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Well neighbour ... has the snow stopped in Seattle?  It has in the Valley.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 11:21:29 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

AND you know I'm just sitting here waiting.....
for the next onslaught of incorrect information.
fingers tapping on the desk......
emails ready.....
I just think we better all stand clear when the poop flies.

I gotta go.

BUT trust me....

I'm ready.
Don't anyone laugh now
after the explosion of poop.

Be kind.
Offer some delicate spray
And perhaps depends.

Cuz trust me on this.
I've got the goods!
LOL
AND it wasn't no SET UP to find out who her informant was. tards.
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


I have my gas mask and Lysol ready.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:22:39 PM
Are you OK Janet? ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 11:23:51 PM
Are you OK Janet? ::MonkeyCool::

What about our 23 guests? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 11:23:53 PM
Thank you KeeptheFaith.   I don't get to look good often. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 11:24:49 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

AND you know I'm just sitting here waiting.....
for the next onslaught of incorrect information.
fingers tapping on the desk......
emails ready.....
I just think we better all stand clear when the poop flies.

I gotta go.

BUT trust me....

I'm ready.
Don't anyone laugh now
after the explosion of poop.

Be kind.
Offer some delicate spray
And perhaps depends.

Cuz trust me on this.
I've got the goods!
LOL
AND it wasn't no SET UP to find out who her informant was. tards.
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


I have my gas mask and Lysol ready.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:25:30 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::

texasmom!!!

I was not alone!!  You thought Keepthefaith was a girl Monkey too!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 27, 2009, 11:26:53 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 11:28:23 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::

texasmom!!!

I was not alone!!  You thought Keepthefaith was a girl Monkey too!!

Janet

Janet, you are never alone!  I'm trying to remember if I gave any hugs.....  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:28:31 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck ... why does this mean the the Kalpoes "won this round".

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:28:47 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet




Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Thanks Keepthefaith.  However ... as curious as I was ... I was going to let the issue drop. 

It is so weird ... it had never entered my mind that you were not a girl monkey.  However ... today when I referred to you as a "her" the majority of the forum spoke up.  They had always assumed you were a boy monkey.  Somethings I pick up on immediate and others ....

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I can just imagine the whispers behind the scenes for the past couple of month with me constantly giving you all those hugs.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Well neighbour ... has the snow stopped in Seattle?  It has in the Valley.

Janet

I guess no one really asked about my gender.So i never brought it up!Snow stopped this morning. ::MonkeyDance:: .I'm able to be on the computer as the family owns are own businesses so that's why i'm here so often.JUSTICE FOR NATALEE,as well as STAY FOCUSED on THE PERSISTENCE!You are a Godsend Natalee,as well as the Monkey's!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:30:04 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::

texasmom!!!

I was not alone!!  You thought Keepthefaith was a girl Monkey too!!

Janet

Janet, you are never alone!  I'm trying to remember if I gave any hugs.....  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanks OK.

Boundaries should not be an issue in regard to hugs.  We all need them once in a while.

Janet.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 27, 2009, 11:30:56 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck ... why does this mean the the Kalpoes "won this round".

Thanks

Janet
Because the judge apparently ruled that the Dr. Phil could not have the case dismissed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 27, 2009, 11:32:45 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck - Where do you see that?  I didn't read it that way but I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:33:19 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck ... why does this mean the the Kalpoes "won this round".

Thanks

Janet
Because the judge apparently ruled that the Dr. Phil could not have the case dismissed.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thanks.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 27, 2009, 11:34:02 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck ... why does this mean the the Kalpoes "won this round".

Thanks

Janet
Because the judge apparently ruled that the Dr. Phil could not have the case dismissed.

Wreck - there was supposed to be a hearing YESTERDAY.  The document I posted was filed the 20th.  There is nothing posted about the 1/26 hearing and there is NO FUTURE date added.  Yet....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:41:21 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::

texasmom!!!

I was not alone!!  You thought Keepthefaith was a girl Monkey too!!

Janet

Janet, you are never alone!  I'm trying to remember if I gave any hugs.....  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanks OK.

Boundaries should not be an issue in regard to hugs.  We all need them once in a while.

Janet.



It's OK Ladies.All plutonic.I have a wonderful girlfriend,as well as our 9yr old daughter.Yes.She is fully aware of my Monkey escapades and feels like she knows you all.I was on the phone with her letting her know i had to out myself this evening to Janet,as well as the rest of the Monkey's!Boy was she laughing.  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 27, 2009, 11:42:48 PM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck ... why does this mean the the Kalpoes "won this round".

Thanks

Janet
Because the judge apparently ruled that the Dr. Phil could not have the case dismissed.

Wreck - there was supposed to be a hearing YESTERDAY.  The document I posted was filed the 20th.  There is nothing posted about the 1/26 hearing and there is NO FUTURE date added.  Yet....
It looks to me the "Conclusion" spells it out. The judge looked at several "defamation" cases and ruled that the defendents could not use the fact that the plaintiffs were "newsworthy" on thier own and thus couldn't be "defamed". Yhis doesn't mean Dr. Phil is "guilty" -- only that he can't use that as an "excuse." (But, hey -- I'm no lawyer)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:43:57 PM
Thank you KeeptheFaith.   I don't get to look good often. ::MonkeyDance::

You alway look good to me Magnolia.

Just don't tell me that you are a boy Monkey.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 27, 2009, 11:45:53 PM
You Monkey's take it easy and don't all post at once... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... we are all waiting for an answer.  Are you a girl monkey or a boy monkey?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Who's we? I think you want to know more then anyone!Would it make a difference if i was a shehe,heshe,she,and or a He  ::MonkeyLaugh::.If you really want to know Janet i will tell you as i'm an honest person! ::MonkeyCool::

No difference.

You are a Godsend to this forum nevertheless.

Back on Topic.  Kermit has entered the room.  He/she should get the discussion going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Janet.Not to make Magnolia look good but i am a male Monkey.Pick your Jaw up!I'm a honest person so i would never lie to you! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::

texasmom!!!

I was not alone!!  You thought Keepthefaith was a girl Monkey too!!

Janet

Janet, you are never alone!  I'm trying to remember if I gave any hugs.....  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanks OK.

Boundaries should not be an issue in regard to hugs.  We all need them once in a while.

Janet.



It's OK Ladies.All plutonic.I have a wonderful girlfriend,as well as our 9yr old daughter.Yes.She is fully aware of my Monkey escapades and feels like she knows you all.I was on the phone with her letting her know i had to out myself this evening to Janet,as well as the rest of the Monkey's!Boy was she laughing.  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Keepthefaith ... just call me Mom.  That makes everything OK.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 27, 2009, 11:46:45 PM
Thank you KeeptheFaith.   I don't get to look good often. ::MonkeyDance::

You alway look good to me Magnolia.

Just don't tell me that you are a boy Monkey.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

No, Janet.....I am a girlmonkey...last time I looked. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:47:39 PM
Thank you KeeptheFaith.   I don't get to look good often. ::MonkeyDance::

We Monkey's all look good!But tonight is your night to shine! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:49:33 PM
I do want to thank Kermit for returning after all the dust settled!That was very much appreciated. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 11:52:24 PM
I do want to thank Kermit for returning after all the dust settled!That was very much appreciated. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree.  I appreciated it too! 

But I'll probably be at work when the sh_t hits the fan!  Dang it! 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:52:33 PM
Are you OK Janet? ::MonkeyCool::

What about our 23 guests? 

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

I will say that i do appreciate the Monkey's very much,as well as the Mods for the impossible job they do on a daily basis!You Mod's are Monkeytastic!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:55:13 PM
I do want to thank Kermit for returning after all the dust settled!That was very much appreciated. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree.  I appreciated it too! 

But I'll probably be at work when the sh_t hits the fan!  Dang it! 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'm going to ask a honest question here.Do these poster's email each other,and or congregate at another forum and wait for Kermit to post then just come to the cage and attempt to discredit the Frog?Really.I'm being 110% serious.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 27, 2009, 11:55:28 PM
Thank you KeeptheFaith.   I don't get to look good often. ::MonkeyDance::

You alway look good to me Magnolia.

Just don't tell me that you are a boy Monkey.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

No, Janet.....I am a girlmonkey...last time I looked. ::MonkeyHaHa::

And a very wise girl monkey at that!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 27, 2009, 11:55:47 PM
I do want to thank Kermit for returning after all the dust settled!That was very much appreciated. ::MonkeyCool::

Yes, a clean and calm cage.....some thoughts I'd been having resurfaced during that visit....even though I was preparing a travel post while it was happening. 

See you, later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 27, 2009, 11:58:48 PM
I do want to thank Kermit for returning after all the dust settled!That was very much appreciated. ::MonkeyCool::

Yes, a clean and calm cage.....some thoughts I'd been having resurfaced during that visit....even though I was preparing a travel post while it was happening. 

See you, later.

2nj.Thank You.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 12:00:03 AM
Shuttin the store down.BBL. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 12:02:33 AM
I do want to thank Kermit for returning after all the dust settled!That was very much appreciated. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree.  I appreciated it too! 

But I'll probably be at work when the sh_t hits the fan!  Dang it! 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'm going to ask a honest question here.Do these poster's email each other,and or congregate at another forum and wait for Kermit to post then just come to the cage and attempt to discredit the Frog?Really.I'm being 110% serious.

JMO but I feel quite sure that email, telephone, and the ultra secret hidey hole are all utilized.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:02:39 AM
That Peter de Vries is one handsome fella!

Thanks caseau for the new photos.  They will go into my collection for sure!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 12:02:55 AM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.
It appears that the Kalpoes won this round. The judge ruled against the defendents motion to dismiss due to them being "Newsworthy."  This could go to actual trial. (I hope so!!)

Wreck ... why does this mean the the Kalpoes "won this round".

Thanks

Janet
Because the judge apparently ruled that the Dr. Phil could not have the case dismissed.

Wreck - there was supposed to be a hearing YESTERDAY.  The document I posted was filed the 20th.  There is nothing posted about the 1/26 hearing and there is NO FUTURE date added.  Yet....

Klaas ... it concerns me that Hans Mos appears to be letting the Kalpoes off the hook on the word of Joran ... the suspect that lies everytime he opens his mouth.

Aruba is counting on the Kalpoes winning this lawsuit with a multi million dollar award.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++

hotping
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #790 1/3/09 -
« Reply #809 on: January 06, 2009, 07:14:06 PM »

Press Anouncement


Ladies and gentlemen!

The Public Prosecutors Office Aruba and the Aruban Police Force would like to give you an updated summary about the investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

Why? Three reasons

First of all there is the fact that a few months ago, based on the results of the investigation, the estimate was that the investigation could be ended by the end of 2008. More specifically I am referring to the re-opened investigation into the suspect in this case, Joran van der Sloot, against whom the criminal investigation was restarted after the broadcast of a Peter R. de Vries investigation last February. Because that program caused a new stream of information, this information first has to be examined which will take at least another few months.

Secondly, about six weeks ago an interview with Joran van der Sloot was broadcasted on an American cable news Channel. In this interview Joran tells a completely new version of the alleged facts that occurred concerning the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Before showing the interview and in the days after the show the Aruban Prosecutors Office and the Aruban Police were alleged to be corrupt and unwilling to investigate possible leads in this case. We find it fit to address those allegations today.

The third reason is that my Office and the Police Department would like to urge all people that have information about things that have occurred on May 30th 2005 or about persons that are or might be involved in this case, whatever that information may be, to hand that information over to the Police or to the Public Prosecutors Office.

For a good understanding of the facts I would like to take you back to December 18th 2007. It was on that day that the three suspects in this case got official notice from my Office that the criminal investigation into their possible involvement in this case was ended. This did not mean that the investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway also ended. On the contrary. That investigation never stopped. If new information or evidence would come up, the criminal investigation against any suspect in this case could be re-opened. This is possible as long as the statute of limitations does not prohibit this.

No one could imagine at that time that within a month from that decision this Office was confronted with the information that Dutch crime investigator Peter R de Vries had made secret camera shots of Joran van der Sloot talking about the case against a civilian under cover. After my Office got the tapes and before the actual broadcast of the Peter R. de Vries program, on our request the criminal investigation against Joran was re-opened by the investigating judge.

At the same time the investigation was fully operational again and had as a main goal to find as much corroborating evidence as possible of what Joran van der Sloot had told the under cover. The judge was asked to approve the third consecutive custody of Joran van der Sloot. The investigating judge against whose decision this Office lodged an appeal at the Common Court of Appeal in Curacao denied this approval. The Court of Appeal upheld the investigating judges’ decision, thus disabling Police to re-arrest Joran van der Sloot.

It is proper to take another look at the Court of Appeals’ decision. The Court of Appeal took into account the footage that was handed over by Peter de Vries as well as all the old investigative results of over nearly 3 years of investigation. Weighing whether there was enough new serious material, evidence (necessary to be able to put one into custody) the Court decided that the new elements that Joran had told the under cover were not corroborated by “objective facts”. On top of that the Court considered the fact that the suspect already had argued that there are objective facts that contradict the new elements that were told by him to the under cover. The fact that Joran has supplied the Police with a motive for his lying behavior and the fact that he has admitted that he often is not telling the truth, makes, according to the Court of Appeal, that the self incriminating new statements of Joran are devaluated.

In short: there is no corroborating evidence for the new self incriminating statements of Joran and the value of these statements is undermined by his own statement about his credibility.

What does the Court’s decision imply when we take a closer look?
1.    After an extensive and intensive investigation, the contents of the Police file combined with the new statements of Joran, does not hold enough evidence necessary to pass the threshold for a third consecutive term of pretrial custody.
2.    Logical conclusion from the above mentioned must be, that the evidence that we do have in the extensive files, is not enough to convict this suspect.

For that reason this Office has made the gathering of these “objective facts” that can serve as evidence against the main suspect it’s primary goal for the investigation from that point on.

What the Police and this Office have done:

•    Already on January 22nd 2008, the day after Peter de Vries had shown the tapes to the Public Prosecutor and the Police, the investigation into the person called “Daury” was started. Finally a person called Daury R. was identified and it turned out that he probably was involved in drug trafficking activities (as had been told by Joran). Because of that and following his own TV-appearance on 20-20, he was arrested in the USA on the suspicion of international drug trafficking. He is currently detained in the USA.

•    Investigation into the pay phone in the hotel garden was started as well as finding an answer to the question whether Joran had the possession of a credit card (necessary to use the phone).

•    On our request the National Prosecutor’s Office in Rotterdam as well as The National Crime Squad executed numerous requests, such as various house searches and finally the questioning of Joran van der Sloot.

•    Since then over 20 witnesses were interviewed, some of them for the second or third time. These interviews pertained mostly to Joran’s missing shoes and the person called “Daury”, Joran’s alleged accomplice.

•    Amongst the witnesses were the two brothers who previously were suspects in this case but who, by the new statements of Joran, received an alibi from Joran, when he told the under cover that the two brothers are “jerks” who don’t know anything about what had happened.

•    During his stay on Aruba the Police twice interviewed under cover “Patrick”.

Besides the Police investigation Peter de Vries’ program received an enormous amount of information. The serious tips were passed on to my Office in order to have them investigated.
Four of them could be investigated and led to thorough investigation.

Furthermore investigation was conducted into the statement of a fisherman, until that moment unknown by the Police or my Office. This witness, known by the Holloway family, claimed that in the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway a large knife was stolen from one of the Fisherman’s huts while at the same time a large crab cage was missing that at least was there until the month of April. This owner of the cage was also interviewed by the Police but told them that this allegedly missing cage had never been left at the huts but was always taken home.

He told the Police that Mrs. Holloway and the press approached him a long time ago and that he had told them his story. His identity was never officially revealed to the Police. It was because the Persistence ship at that time was searching for relevant material on the sea bed that the story about the cage and the fisherman came up in a conversation between this Office and Mr. Dave Holloway, which led this Office to the identity of the witness.

As you may know, the expedition of the Persistence led to only one finding that was supposed to be relevant to this case. Special Police divers brought certain material to the surface of which one might assume could be the clothes of Natalee Holloway. These samples were sent to the FBI laboratory. After examination by the FBI the result was that these samples did not match the clothes of Natalee.

In the month of March 2008 a witness who was urged by Dave Holloway to step forward confronted the Prosecutor’s Office. The man gave a statement on March 16th 2008 accompanied by his lawyer. This witness statement is already widely known: the witness claims he saw Joran van der Sloot in the middle of the night of May 30th walking in front of his house, soaked up to his chest, walking on one shoe and heavily breathing. He was walking into the direction of the hotels, coming from the direction of the Church at Noord. What the witness was actually aiming for was the Police to conduct an intensive search in the dam of Monserrat. Nevertheless the witness could not give us any reason why the Police should conduct a search in the dam. It was the conclusion of the witness that Joran had come from the dam since he came walking from that direction. There was no indication whatsoever that Joran had been at the dam. For that reason the Police were not ordered to conduct that search. Later, people from the Persistence asked if they were allowed to conduct a search. They were told that they could go ahead if the wanted to. No results were reported. Besides that, the Monserrat dam, which had completely fallen dry by that time, was not long before that request completely searched by dozens of people, for a completely different reason. No results were reported.

This witness has turned himself to Dave Holloway, as we have been told. He has given a new statement and has undergone a lie detector test. According to the summary of the lie detector test results (a full report, as promised to my Office by Tim Miller was never received) the witness was considered to be reliable. This Office never questioned the reliability of what the witness claimed to have seen. Yet, the value of his statement in the reconstruction of facts of that night is very limited. With his sole statement this case could never be solved.

Police and the Prosecutor’s Office are being accused of not following leads in this investigation. Those allegations are unjust and unfounded. Of course it is true that we weigh the information and the source on credibility and value before we start to investigate. But witnesses, who claim to have leads that find no ground in facts whatsoever and therefore are not being investigated by the Police, are free to investigate those themselves. This - of course – within the limitations imposed by law.

I will give you three examples of what we have experienced the last 10 months in terms of leads given by people who claim to have special powers and know where Natalee would be.

The first one claimed that Natalee was in the hands of foreign criminals but could not give us any actual lead to follow.

The second one recently claimed that the girl was buried on an Aruba beach. After consulting my Office and the Police a private search was conducted, only facilitated by the Police. No result was reported.

The third person was very persistent and claimed he had witnesses he could not disclose to my Office. He claimed Natalee was buried under a hotel that was under construction at the time of her disappearance. He requested that my Office would order a hole to be drilled in the hotel floor in order to conduct an endoscopic search underneath the hotel. When the prosecutor asked the man for the undisclosed witnesses and kept asking for his sources, he finally admitted that his theory was based on a dream.

As you can see, this is just a part of what we have experienced over the past months. There is much more of these “leads” which take us an awful lot of time and distract us from the actual investigation. We do not obstruct anyone, but when there is no concrete information or the information is unreliable we chose not to investigate that lead or that information. In that respect the Aruban Police is not different from any other Police force in the world.

CONCLUDING:

This I can tell you: during the investigation of which you just received an overview, a series of investigative acts were conducted. I will not disclose the results of that investigation here and now because the investigation is not yet finished and my Office does not want to disclose these results to the suspect and thus make him wiser even before he has been confronted with these results. Only as soon as the investigation into the new statements of Joran van der Sloot has been completely finalized, the suspect will be notified about the decision by my Office whether he will be charged or not. At that time the public also will be informed. If possible investigative results may be disclosed to the public.

When will the investigation be completed?

At this moment the last leads and some minor details are under investigation. These minor questions first have to be answered before a decision can be made. The Public Prosecutor’s Office expects to have conducted the necessary investigations within a number of months. Exact data cannot be determined.

Furthermore I would like to say this.
Recently Fox broadcast an interview of Joran van der Sloot recorded by Greta van Susteren in the spring of 2008. In this interview Joran presents yet another new version of the facts. This time he claims he has sold Natalee Holloway on the beach for $ 10,000 to a person called `Adamovic´ after a prearranged agreement. This man had taken the girl from the beach on a boat and sailed away.
Although Fox already had the possession of this information for nearly 6 months, it waited to disclose it to the public by the end of November 2008. A request by my Office to provide this information to us digitally was left unanswered.

Now suddenly Fox and a lawyer demand that my Office shall conduct an intensive investigation into a story of which the anchor of the program herself already considered the possibility that it could be “a wild goose chase”. Furthermore Joran van der Sloot after the interview was taped, denied that what he said was true. The Fox program also showed an interview with Joran´s American lawyer, in which the program’s anchor implicitly admitted that Joran was paid for the interview. Finally Fox broadcasts a so-called telephone conversation between Joran and his father. The contents of that phone call are supposed to corroborate Joran´s new story. The taped conversation between Joran and his father recently has been downloaded from the Internet by the Police and handed over to the Dutch Forensic Institute. This independent institute, the NFI, has been requested by the Police and my Office to conduct a voice-comparing investigation between the voice on that tape and earlier recordings of Paul van der Sloot. Within a few months we will know whether the material can be investigated and if so, what the results will be.

It is more than remarkable that no longer than 5 months after Joran´s so called confessions were taped on hidden cameras by Peter R. de Vries, statements both in the Netherlands and in the USA considered as “the solving of the case”, this Joran now comes forward with a completely different new story. Now this story is being considered as one that urgently has to be investigated. This while there are many indications that Joran simply pulled Fox’s leg and earned himself a lot of money as well. To prove that we are dealing with “a wild goose chase”, the Police on our request have checked some verifiable parts from Joran´s new statement, which show that it is a wild goose chase.

The Holloway family lawyer, who demanded the immediate arrest of suspects, was told that the Public Prosecutor, given the legal requirements, couldn’t find any ground in this interview to order an arrest.

Final remarks

Police and the Prosecutor’s Office on Aruba are still conducting an investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Yet we are approaching the end of this lengthy investigation and are busy with the last two leads. Now we are still busy I would like to add this: if you have relevant information, no matter how small or uninteresting it may seem, please notify my Office or the Police here on Aruba.

The purpose of the criminal investigation is to establish beyond reasonable doubt what has happened to Natalee Holloway on the night of May 30th 2005. Have crimes been committed against her and, if so, which crimes and by whom? And if someone is responsible for crimes committed, that person, whoever he may be, should be held accountable for those crimes in a court of law. Yet that result still has not been met.

In short: it is the Police and the Prosecutor’s Office that have, and should have, the primary responsibility for a criminal investigation. That is the way it is legally laid down in our judicial system. If others want to help, we will applaud them doing so. Yet, when those activities start to get counter productive and under circumstances jeopardizes the investigation, we should address the public and make them aware of these effects.
In order to prevent that happening we thought it fit to inform you through this press conference.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4344.msg614673#msg614673


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:06:20 AM
2NJ,
I signed up for cruise newsletter and another travel one on trips to the Caribbean.

You are correct.  They keep becoming cheaper and cheaper.  Now only about $100 or less a night including airfare.  I think that is cheaper than I could feed my three sons at home.  Just kidding but for all inclusives, it is unbelievably cheap with transportation there and back.  Usually but not always from Florida.

So even if they are keeping rooms full, it is at a discounted price.  Very discounted.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:10:58 AM
I am off to bed.  G'nite all.


Wow is right!  Maybe you will dream about de Vrires!

G'nite!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 12:11:10 AM
Tamikosmom:
Quote
•    Amongst the witnesses were the two brothers who previously were suspects in this case but who, by the new statements of Joran, received an alibi from Joran, when he told the under cover that the two brothers are “jerks” who don’t know anything about what had happened.

Sure -- they won't go after Joran BECAUSE he LIES. They won't go after the Kalpoes because they BELIEVE him!!  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 12:13:10 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

A game of 500 Rummy awaits.

Janet and Ducky
9:10 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 12:13:48 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

A game of 500 Rummy awaits.

Janet and Ducky
9:10 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 12:14:11 AM
Tamikosmom:
Quote
•    Amongst the witnesses were the two brothers who previously were suspects in this case but who, by the new statements of Joran, received an alibi from Joran, when he told the under cover that the two brothers are “jerks” who don’t know anything about what had happened.

Sure -- they won't go after Joran BECAUSE he LIES. They won't go after the Kalpoes because they BELIEVE him!!  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

Aruba logic.

  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: SS on January 28, 2009, 12:15:31 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 12:17:49 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

Guess it took the whole group, and three hours to come up with that one; while in route to Aruba?   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:18:15 AM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.



Wreck, I read that as signed by the attorneys for the Kalpoes and not a judge, right?

They are just asking the judge to make a ruling  in this manner but one has not yet been made, just their request for it.

Claiming the image, etc, can't be used as newsworthy and that it distorts the truth which has yet to be determined.

But is their lawyers asking for this ruling and not the actual ruling being made by the judge.

Anyone else read it differently?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 12:18:27 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

 ::MonkeyShocked::

SS ... I do not have a clue what you are talking about.  Please direct me to my posts that offended you personally.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 28, 2009, 12:19:21 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 12:20:24 AM
SS ... hubby has the cards dealt and ... waiting on me at the kitchen table.

I will respond tomorrow.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 12:21:29 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
How can you be "defamed" when your identity is an internet nickname???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 12:23:25 AM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.



Wreck, I read that as signed by the attorneys for the Kalpoes and not a judge, right?

They are just asking the judge to make a ruling  in this manner but one has not yet been made, just their request for it.

Claiming the image, etc, can't be used as newsworthy and that it distorts the truth which has yet to be determined.

But is their lawyers asking for this ruling and not the actual ruling being made by the judge.

Anyone else read it differently?


You are probably right! (I told you I ain't no lawyer!)  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 12:23:52 AM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.



Wreck, I read that as signed by the attorneys for the Kalpoes and not a judge, right?

They are just asking the judge to make a ruling  in this manner but one has not yet been made, just their request for it.

Claiming the image, etc, can't be used as newsworthy and that it distorts the truth which has yet to be determined.

But is their lawyers asking for this ruling and not the actual ruling being made by the judge.

Anyone else read it differently?



That's how I read it Anna, the plaintiff's are asking the judge for a ruling, the ruling has not been made.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 28, 2009, 12:24:33 AM
Well, I have been reading here for hours trying to catch up.  I cleaned up my computer  and I forgot it wiped out my password and I was logged on as a guest!  Took me forever to figure out why I couldn't post.......   ::MonkeyHaHa::

My excuse is my head is killing me.... PASS THE ADVIL SAN......PRETTY PLEASE


Anyway, a monkette can't be gone for long or she misses all the action.......dang.......

I know this is petty, but I truly can't help myself, how many posters belong to C&G or were former members at C&G........  Come on now, raise your hand......  Come on, give it up........

LMAO  no wonder there's been so much trouble in the cage!  Alas, woe is me, I was never invited.  Maybe I will get to be in the "look what was posted at SM" thread??

 I STAND WITH THE FROG.  THANK YOU FREEBIRDS FOR BRINGING OVER ALL THE ENLIGHTENING IFORMATION.  IT CLEARED UP AND CONFIRMED SO MUCH FOR ME.

 ::MonkeyRoll::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 28, 2009, 12:27:14 AM
OMG, Klaas, Mods  DID YOU SEE THAT....... I HIT 400 POSTS!!!!!!!!

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 12:31:39 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 12:36:12 AM
OMG, Klaas, Mods  DID YOU SEE THAT....... I HIT 400 POSTS!!!!!!!!

 ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 28, 2009, 12:40:44 AM
I have attached the most recent filing in the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case.  There was supposed to be a hearing yesterday.  There is no future hearings schedule and no documents posted pertaining to a hearing yesterday, only this document from 1/20/09.



Wreck, I read that as signed by the attorneys for the Kalpoes and not a judge, right?

They are just asking the judge to make a ruling  in this manner but one has not yet been made, just their request for it.

Claiming the image, etc, can't be used as newsworthy and that it distorts the truth which has yet to be determined.

But is their lawyers asking for this ruling and not the actual ruling being made by the judge.

Anyone else read it differently?



That's how I read it Anna, the plaintiff's are asking the judge for a ruling, the ruling has not been made.

I GOT A RULING FOR THEM!!! 

 :smt021


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:40:53 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/ksbhgcdi.jpg)


SS, I think you have done far, far more to your own credibility than anyone else has.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 12:42:23 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/ksbhgcdi.jpg)


SS, I think you have done far, far more to your own credibility than anyone else has.


I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 28, 2009, 12:43:05 AM
Goodnight Good Monkeys,  Keep Up The Good Fight.

5:00 am comes early

 :smt015


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 12:45:09 AM
Goodnight Good Monkeys,  Keep Up The Good Fight.

5:00 am comes early

 :smt015

Goodnight KYcat!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 12:47:04 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

Guess it took the whole group, and three hours to come up with that one; while in route to Aruba?   ::MonkeyWink::

Is this a joke?You can not be serious. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 28, 2009, 12:51:52 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS


 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Bwahahahahahahahaha!  ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Did Kyle help write that?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 12:54:04 AM
Goodnight Good Monkeys,  Keep Up The Good Fight.

5:00 am comes early

 :smt015

Goodnight KYcat!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 01:09:30 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
SS, Now that's just silly (insert funny). I don't care who you are, that's silly (insert funny). Compliments to Larry the Cable Guy....and billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 01:10:01 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS


 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Bwahahahahahahahaha!  ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Did Kyle help write that?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyLaugh::



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Yes, you can usually tell which ones had help.  So after days and days of mostly being ignored, now we have drama!  Threats, even. 

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thimages.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:10:16 AM
Stackin,stackin,stackin....Billb is here  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 01:14:14 AM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 01:15:05 AM
Stackin,stackin,stackin....Billb is here  ::MonkeyTongue::
Did you say stackin....stackin...stackin......don't tell me you said stackin!!!!
Hi MR KTF.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:19:05 AM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1

That about say's it in a nutshell klaas.Couldn't get much closer!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:20:08 AM
Stackin,stackin,stackin....Billb is here  ::MonkeyTongue::
Did you say stackin....stackin...stackin......don't tell me you said stackin!!!!
Hi MR KTF.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hello BillB.Please call Monkey Inquirer.I've been outed.I am a Mr.Monkey! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 01:24:48 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
SS, Now that's just silly (insert funny). I don't care who you are, that's silly (insert funny). Compliments to Larry the Cable Guy....and billb
SS...
Just to be clear.....if you think I am making defamation of your character, SS...It is true, I am making defamation of the character SS. I don't have a clue who the person is behind the character SS.
But on a lighter note...SS.....go to the light, it will save you from the darkside.....go to the light....we can talk once you get there.....



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:27:24 AM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

AND you know I'm just sitting here waiting.....
for the next onslaught of incorrect information.
fingers tapping on the desk......
emails ready.....
I just think we better all stand clear when the poop flies.

I gotta go.

BUT trust me....

I'm ready.
Don't anyone laugh now
after the explosion of poop.

Be kind.
Offer some delicate spray
And perhaps depends.

Cuz trust me on this.
I've got the goods!
LOL
AND it wasn't no SET UP to find out who her informant was. tards.
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Don't worry Kermit.I'm putting on my fullbody Feces suit for tomorrow,as well as my stool remover ready to go. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 01:27:51 AM
Stackin,stackin,stackin....Billb is here  ::MonkeyTongue::
Did you say stackin....stackin...stackin......don't tell me you said stackin!!!!
Hi MR KTF.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hello BillB.Please call Monkey Inquirer.I've been outed.I am a Mr.Monkey! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF...Tell me it ain't so...all the times I flirted with you...like never...who would even think of starting that rumor??? TM...was that you?.... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 01:28:55 AM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

AND you know I'm just sitting here waiting.....
for the next onslaught of incorrect information.
fingers tapping on the desk......
emails ready.....
I just think we better all stand clear when the poop flies.

I gotta go.

BUT trust me....

I'm ready.
Don't anyone laugh now
after the explosion of poop.

Be kind.
Offer some delicate spray
And perhaps depends.

Cuz trust me on this.
I've got the goods!
LOL
AND it wasn't no SET UP to find out who her informant was. tards.
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Don't worry Kermit.I'm putting on my fullbody Feces suit for tomorrow,as well as my stool remover ready to go. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:30:04 AM
Stackin,stackin,stackin....Billb is here  ::MonkeyTongue::
Did you say stackin....stackin...stackin......don't tell me you said stackin!!!!
Hi MR KTF.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hello BillB.Please call Monkey Inquirer.I've been outed.I am a Mr.Monkey! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF...Tell me it ain't so...all the times I flirted with you...like never...who would even think of starting that rumor??? TM...was that you?.... ::MonkeyDance::

Now that's funny.After the day we've had.Ending it with laughs is what it's about in the Cage! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 01:30:45 AM
Stackin,stackin,stackin....Billb is here  ::MonkeyTongue::
Did you say stackin....stackin...stackin......don't tell me you said stackin!!!!
Hi MR KTF.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hello BillB.Please call Monkey Inquirer.I've been outed.I am a Mr.Monkey! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF...Tell me it ain't so...all the times I flirted with you...like never...who would even think of starting that rumor??? TM...was that you?.... ::MonkeyDance::

Don't look at me billb!  (btw...good to see you!)  I thought KTF was a girl monkey too!   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:32:16 AM
Klaas.I see you up there.Billb and TM are off topic. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 01:32:37 AM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -
« Reply #935 on: Today at 04:53:05 PM »
No she did not Kermit.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.920

Don't make me post the suckers!

Cuz I fear Ms lalasmom is not gonna like pooping her pants.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I would sorta like to see that. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Right while she was writing in her book and all.

AND you know I'm just sitting here waiting.....
for the next onslaught of incorrect information.
fingers tapping on the desk......
emails ready.....
I just think we better all stand clear when the poop flies.

I gotta go.

BUT trust me....

I'm ready.
Don't anyone laugh now
after the explosion of poop.

Be kind.
Offer some delicate spray
And perhaps depends.

Cuz trust me on this.
I've got the goods!
LOL
AND it wasn't no SET UP to find out who her informant was. tards.
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Don't worry Kermit.I'm putting on my fullbody Feces suit for tomorrow,as well as my stool remover ready to go. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Kermit...Monkeys...please don't worry about me....my whole life is surrounded by BS....I work for the Defense dept...which, in all seriousness, I'm extremely proud and humbled. They have so far allowed me to serve for 42 yrs plus....but anyway...for the sake of this post, I am well covered....poop on...
billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:33:05 AM
On a serious note BillB.Did you catch the end of the last thread?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 01:36:36 AM
Klaas.I see you up there.Billb and TM are off topic. ::MonkeyLaugh::

::MonkeyShocked:: It's all KTF's fault Klaas, monkey pinkey swear! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:37:20 AM
I checked Bon Dia and Diario.Anything in the other papers TM.I always forget what it's called.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 01:41:44 AM
PLEASE TRY AND STAY ON TOPIC  ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:42:29 AM
PLEASE TRY AND STAY ON TOPIC  ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOODNIGHT ALL!

GoodNight Klaas! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 01:44:12 AM
On a serious note BillB.Did you catch the end of the last thread?
I did ktf...the trolls came by to deflect again. I'm getting used to it. (scrolling, scrolling, scrolling comes to mind...I just can't get it out of my head!...ELO...LOL), They really are continuing to show their true colors (no offense Kermit...I Stand with the Frog and the Freebirds...the only clan that backs up their posts).
I may have an opinion...what specifically do you want to discuss?
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:44:23 AM
Hope all Monkey's in the ice storms in the south are OK.Just had some news on Kentucky BlueMoon.Trees falling on power lines and starting fires.Hope all is well!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 01:45:59 AM
I checked Bon Dia and Diario.Anything in the other papers TM.I always forget what it's called.

Awe Mainta had a front pager about Valero possibly closing; didn't see anymore about it inside but I was fast scanning!

1/28/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01282009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=240:valero-lo-por-cera-refinera-na-aruba&catid=11:local&Itemid=56

Papiamentu translation:

valero will can close refinera at aruba
tuesday, 27 january 2009 20:54 valero energy corp will can close permanentemente the refinerianan cu they does not more y cu they not can sell, according declaracionnan yesterday of chairman y chief executive, bill klesse. “si do you not kierman y do you not can bendenan, i am supone cu the respuesta will is si”, klesse owing to contesta on the question if the refinerianan not deseabel will can wordo close permanentemente, cu owing to wordo haci by of one analista. esey kiermen cu the refinerianan at aruba y memphis (merca) if not arrive at one acuerdo rapidamente for they throw, will can close they door, lagando one cantidad big of aruban without work come across



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 01:47:45 AM
PLEASE TRY AND STAY ON TOPIC  ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Goodnight Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:48:21 AM
On a serious note BillB.Did you catch the end of the last thread?
I did ktf...the trolls came by to deflect again. I'm getting used to it. (scrolling, scrolling, scrolling comes to mind...I just can't get it out of my head!...ELO...LOL), They really are continuing to show their true colors (no offense Kermit...I Stand with the Frog and the Freebirds...the only clan that backs up their posts).
I may have an opinion...what specifically do you want to discuss?
 

Didn't know if you had a chance to read it due to the thread change.Although i'm sure i'll never be able to understand.What do these posters hope to accomplish?Really.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:51:58 AM
I checked Bon Dia and Diario.Anything in the other papers TM.I always forget what it's called.

Awe Mainta had a front pager about Valero possibly closing; didn't see anymore about it inside but I was fast scanning!

1/28/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01282009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=240:valero-lo-por-cera-refinera-na-aruba&catid=11:local&Itemid=56

Papiamentu translation:

valero will can close refinera at aruba
tuesday, 27 january 2009 20:54 valero energy corp will can close permanentemente the refinerianan cu they does not more y cu they not can sell, according declaracionnan yesterday of chairman y chief executive, bill klesse. “si do you not kierman y do you not can bendenan, i am supone cu the respuesta will is si”, klesse owing to contesta on the question if the refinerianan not deseabel will can wordo close permanentemente, cu owing to wordo haci by of one analista. esey kiermen cu the refinerianan at aruba y memphis (merca) if not arrive at one acuerdo rapidamente for they throw, will can close they door, lagando one cantidad big of aruban without work come across



Why would Valero close that refinery?Isn't that a fairly strategic location?Is someone buying it?What will they put there in it's place?Just thinking out loud!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 01:52:20 AM
I checked Bon Dia and Diario.Anything in the other papers TM.I always forget what it's called.

Awe Mainta had a front pager about Valero possibly closing; didn't see anymore about it inside but I was fast scanning!

1/28/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01282009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=240:valero-lo-por-cera-refinera-na-aruba&catid=11:local&Itemid=56

Papiamentu translation:

valero will can close refinera at aruba
tuesday, 27 january 2009 20:54 valero energy corp will can close permanentemente the refinerianan cu they does not more y cu they not can sell, according declaracionnan yesterday of chairman y chief executive, bill klesse. “si do you not kierman y do you not can bendenan, i am supone cu the respuesta will is si”, klesse owing to contesta on the question if the refinerianan not deseabel will can wordo close permanentemente, cu owing to wordo haci by of one analista. esey kiermen cu the refinerianan at aruba y memphis (merca) if not arrive at one acuerdo rapidamente for they throw, will can close they door, lagando one cantidad big of aruban without work come across





Oh, wow, this would be major doom for Aruba.  On top of the tourist situation, major, major doom.  All Valero has to do is let the refinery sit idle and they just may with the economy as it is.

Big time major doom for Aruba should this happen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 01:55:25 AM
KTF, price of oil and gasoline is down.  Might be more economical to operate closer to home.  Many are just cutting back because of less demand.

I tought it was a done deal that Brazil was buying it but Aruba has made premature claims about the future of the refinery many times.

It's about their only other source of income after tourism.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 02:00:13 AM
Didn't know if you had a chance to read it due to the thread change.Although i'm sure i'll never be able to understand.What do these posters hope to accomplish?Really.


Just to disrupt and/or silence the discussion about the trap and failure to handle the contents in a responsible manner???

I don't think there is any excuse for misquoting a member of Natalee's family for any reason.  Set up or not, that is just plain wrong.

No one is required to post here.  We all post as guests of the owner of the site.  That would be Red.  But some just keep on and on and on trying to stir up something.  It is obviously just a game of some sort to them and they think they are more important than justice. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:00:27 AM
KTF, price of oil and gasoline is down.  Might be more economical to operate closer to home.  Many are just cutting back because of less demand.

I tought it was a done deal that Brazil was buying it but Aruba has made premature claims about the future of the refinery many times.

It's about their only other source of income after tourism.

It is a interesting dynamic.What will Aruba do?Time will tell and i think it will be interesting!gas prices can keep going down. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 28, 2009, 02:03:59 AM
Good night monkeys..... :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 28, 2009, 02:05:04 AM
Nite Mere

Nite Monkeys

HUGS

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:06:58 AM



Goodnight Mere and OS!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:07:15 AM
Didn't know if you had a chance to read it due to the thread change.Although i'm sure i'll never be able to understand.What do these posters hope to accomplish?Really.


Just to disrupt and/or silence the discussion about the trap and failure to handle the contents in a responsible manner???

I don't think there is any excuse for misquoting a member of Natalee's family for any reason.  Set up or not, that is just plain wrong.

No one is required to post here.  We all post as guests of the owner of the site.  That would be Red.  But some just keep on and on and on trying to stir up something.  It is obviously just a game of some sort to them and they think they are more important than justice. 


The goal is simple.JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:07:45 AM
Good night monkeys..... :)

Goodnight Mere!

Goodnight Os!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 02:10:13 AM
On a serious note BillB.Did you catch the end of the last thread?
I did ktf...the trolls came by to deflect again. I'm getting used to it. (scrolling, scrolling, scrolling comes to mind...I just can't get it out of my head!...ELO...LOL), They really are continuing to show their true colors (no offense Kermit...I Stand with the Frog and the Freebirds...the only clan that backs up their posts).
I may have an opinion...what specifically do you want to discuss?
 

Didn't know if you had a chance to read it due to the thread change.Although i'm sure i'll never be able to understand.What do these posters hope to accomplish?Really.
The confused SM posters (now turning towards trolls) are just trying to hang on to their egos but trying to convince us that they had reason to move over to the (not sustainable )way of thinking that somehow kyle/John s/louis s/caps..are truly behind supporting Justice for Natalee....IMHO..Monkeys are to smart to buy into that "way of thinking"...because, quite frankly...it does not add up in any stretch of the imagination. I honestly looked forward to most of their posts before the events of the persistence search...But with their every post since then, they appear hellbent to discredit Kermit and the Freebird posters...but don't have any documentation to back their position....truly sad...kyle, john s, loius s, caps have all been encouraged to posts their positions, but haven't...and why anyone would think that speaking on behalf of them would influence the monkeys to accept their positions without questions...
well...that is lame......

My only


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:11:21 AM
KTF, price of oil and gasoline is down.  Might be more economical to operate closer to home.  Many are just cutting back because of less demand.

I tought it was a done deal that Brazil was buying it but Aruba has made premature claims about the future of the refinery many times.

It's about their only other source of income after tourism.

It is a interesting dynamic.What will Aruba do?Time will tell and i think it will be interesting!gas prices can keep going down. ::MonkeyDance::

http://www.aruba.com/forum/f7/valero-refinery-30591/index2.html

snip

Quote
I'm sure that the refinery is going to be sold before January of 2011, because then the tax holiday this refinery enjoys in Aruba expires. That gives Valero some 2.5 years to finalize the sale.



Quote
If anyone was curious WHY Valero wants to sell the refinery here is the answer...they don't want to put anymore money investing in upgrading the equipment...either way, imo, I am happy that the refinery will have a buyer and will not simply shut down.

snip



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=akkyr7QbxPrU&refer=news

Valero Plans to Sell Aruba Refinery in Second Quarter (Update2)

Email | Print | A A A

By Victor Epstein

March 26 (Bloomberg) -- Valero Energy Corp., the largest U.S. refiner, plans to sell its Aruba refinery in the second quarter to focus on improvements to plants that can process cheaper oil.

The list of plants Valero has identified for possible sale also includes those in Krotz Springs, Louisiana, Memphis, and Ardmore, Oklahoma. Bill Klesse, chief executive officer of the San Antonio-based company, said refineries fetched more money a year ago.

The company plans to bankroll improvements at its most complex plants by selling off its least desirable assets. Valero sold its 120-year-old refinery in Lima, Ohio, for $1.9 billion in July 2007.

``Aruba, I believe is going to happen,'' Klesse said today during a presentation to analysts and investors in New York. ``We have a transaction and we have a buyer and everything here fits very nicely.''

The Aruba buyer may be Rio De Janeiro-based Petroleo Brasileiro SA or Switzerland-based Petroplus Holdings AG, Roger Read, an analyst at Natixis Bleichroeder Inc. in New York, said in a telephone interview.

Refineries are selling for less this year than they did in 2007 because high oil prices have narrowed processing margins, making the business look less attractive, Read said. Financing is also more difficult because of the credit crunch, he said.

``The upper range potential for what you could sell a refinery for is less now than a year ago, but Valero's still going to sell every one of these refineries for more than they paid for them,'' said Read, who has a ``buy'' rating on Valero shares and doesn't own them.

No Investments

Klesse also said Valero has no plans to invest in the Krotz Springs and Memphis plants. Memphis needs a new fluid catalytic cracker because the unit must be shut for repairs every 18 months instead of the four-to-five-year timeframe Valero considers normal, he said. Crackers are a refinery's primary gasoline-processing unit.

Valero shares rose 86 cents, or 1.8 percent, to $48.96 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have dropped 30 percent this year.

``The challenge to selling Aruba is that it needs a lot of additional investment,'' Read said. ``Whoever buys it is going to have to put a lot of money into it.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Victor Epstein in Houston at vepstein@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 26, 2008 16:17 EDT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 02:13:56 AM
Good night monkeys..... :)


Good night, Mere.

Think I will head for the monkey bunkey myself. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:14:32 AM


Goodnight Anna!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:16:06 AM
I just ran across this and thought WTF......This is Crazy!  ::MonkeyShocked::



   
http://buywineguide.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-drink-in-aruba-at-bars-natalie.html
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:17:58 AM
Good Night Anna!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:20:39 AM
Didn't know if you had a chance to read it due to the thread change.Although i'm sure i'll never be able to understand.What do these posters hope to accomplish?Really.


Just to disrupt and/or silence the discussion about the trap and failure to handle the contents in a responsible manner???

I don't think there is any excuse for misquoting a member of Natalee's family for any reason.  Set up or not, that is just plain wrong.

No one is required to post here.  We all post as guests of the owner of the site.  That would be Red.  But some just keep on and on and on trying to stir up something.  It is obviously just a game of some sort to them and they think they are more important than justice. 


The goal is simple.JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.

Now that Monkey's understand i'm a Mr.Monkey with a 9yr old daughter.I must say.Dave and Beth are the epitome of Good Human beings.I can say unequivocally,i don't think i could handle myself in such a dignified manner regarding the MURDER and cover-up of my daughter.The Americans on the Persistence is just more salt in the wound.Natalee would be getting ready to go to Med school if she chose to!These POS on Aruba live their lives and walk FREE..The only solace i have is that they WILL meet their maker!

GOD BLESS DAVE AND BETH,THE MONKEY'S,AND ALL THOSE WHO KEEP NATALEE HOLLOWAY IN THEIR PRAYERS AND HEARTS.

TO ALL A GOODNIGHT.

KEEPTHEFAITH

God Bless


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 28, 2009, 02:23:50 AM
I've got lots of catching up to do, but wanted to say HELLO to all, while you guys were still awake!!

Hi Monkeys!!  ::MonkeyWink::

Yes, it's all about Natalee........... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:24:51 AM
On a serious note BillB.Did you catch the end of the last thread?
I did ktf...the trolls came by to deflect again. I'm getting used to it. (scrolling, scrolling, scrolling comes to mind...I just can't get it out of my head!...ELO...LOL), They really are continuing to show their true colors (no offense Kermit...I Stand with the Frog and the Freebirds...the only clan that backs up their posts).
I may have an opinion...what specifically do you want to discuss?
 

Didn't know if you had a chance to read it due to the thread change.Although i'm sure i'll never be able to understand.What do these posters hope to accomplish?Really.
The confused SM posters (now turning towards trolls) are just trying to hang on to their egos but trying to convince us that they had reason to move over to the (not sustainable )way of thinking that somehow kyle/John s/louis s/caps..are truly behind supporting Justice for Natalee....IMHO..Monkeys are to smart to buy into that "way of thinking"...because, quite frankly...it does not add up in any stretch of the imagination. I honestly looked forward to most of their posts before the events of the persistence search...But with their every post since then, they appear hellbent to discredit Kermit and the Freebird posters...but don't have any documentation to back their position....truly sad...kyle, john s, loius s, caps have all been encouraged to posts their positions, but haven't...and why anyone would think that speaking on behalf of them would influence the monkeys to accept their positions without questions...
well...that is lame......

My only

Thanx Billb.Till tomorrow!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:26:11 AM
KTF, price of oil and gasoline is down.  Might be more economical to operate closer to home.  Many are just cutting back because of less demand.

I tought it was a done deal that Brazil was buying it but Aruba has made premature claims about the future of the refinery many times.

It's about their only other source of income after tourism.

It is a interesting dynamic.What will Aruba do?Time will tell and i think it will be interesting!gas prices can keep going down. ::MonkeyDance::

http://www.aruba.com/forum/f7/valero-refinery-30591/index2.html

snip

Quote
I'm sure that the refinery is going to be sold before January of 2011, because then the tax holiday this refinery enjoys in Aruba expires. That gives Valero some 2.5 years to finalize the sale.



Quote
If anyone was curious WHY Valero wants to sell the refinery here is the answer...they don't want to put anymore money investing in upgrading the equipment...either way, imo, I am happy that the refinery will have a buyer and will not simply shut down.

snip



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=akkyr7QbxPrU&refer=news

Valero Plans to Sell Aruba Refinery in Second Quarter (Update2)

Email | Print | A A A

By Victor Epstein

March 26 (Bloomberg) -- Valero Energy Corp., the largest U.S. refiner, plans to sell its Aruba refinery in the second quarter to focus on improvements to plants that can process cheaper oil.

The list of plants Valero has identified for possible sale also includes those in Krotz Springs, Louisiana, Memphis, and Ardmore, Oklahoma. Bill Klesse, chief executive officer of the San Antonio-based company, said refineries fetched more money a year ago.

The company plans to bankroll improvements at its most complex plants by selling off its least desirable assets. Valero sold its 120-year-old refinery in Lima, Ohio, for $1.9 billion in July 2007.

``Aruba, I believe is going to happen,'' Klesse said today during a presentation to analysts and investors in New York. ``We have a transaction and we have a buyer and everything here fits very nicely.''

The Aruba buyer may be Rio De Janeiro-based Petroleo Brasileiro SA or Switzerland-based Petroplus Holdings AG, Roger Read, an analyst at Natixis Bleichroeder Inc. in New York, said in a telephone interview.

Refineries are selling for less this year than they did in 2007 because high oil prices have narrowed processing margins, making the business look less attractive, Read said. Financing is also more difficult because of the credit crunch, he said.

``The upper range potential for what you could sell a refinery for is less now than a year ago, but Valero's still going to sell every one of these refineries for more than they paid for them,'' said Read, who has a ``buy'' rating on Valero shares and doesn't own them.

No Investments

Klesse also said Valero has no plans to invest in the Krotz Springs and Memphis plants. Memphis needs a new fluid catalytic cracker because the unit must be shut for repairs every 18 months instead of the four-to-five-year timeframe Valero considers normal, he said. Crackers are a refinery's primary gasoline-processing unit.

Valero shares rose 86 cents, or 1.8 percent, to $48.96 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have dropped 30 percent this year.

``The challenge to selling Aruba is that it needs a lot of additional investment,'' Read said. ``Whoever buys it is going to have to put a lot of money into it.''

To contact the reporter on this story: Victor Epstein in Houston at vepstein@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: March 26, 2008 16:17 EDT

More interesting Stuff.Thanx TM.I will google all day long tomorrow. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:27:14 AM
Good Night MR KTF! I'm sorry I missed out on all the fun earlier but a Friend called from PA and kept Me on the phone for hours...She is snowed in and was having a bad case of the Winter Blues.....BTW I thought You were a Girl Monkey Too!  ::MonkeyTongue:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:27:23 AM
I just ran across this and thought WTF......This is Crazy!  ::MonkeyShocked::



   
http://buywineguide.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-drink-in-aruba-at-bars-natalie.html
 

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: Yes Hotping, that's crazy and sick!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:28:21 AM



Goodnight KTF!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:31:22 AM
Good Night All!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 02:34:09 AM
I just ran across this and thought WTF......This is Crazy!  ::MonkeyShocked::



   
http://buywineguide.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-drink-in-aruba-at-bars-natalie.html
 
Hotping....
you are so right...this is crazy to all thinking adults...but common in aruba society...unfortunately...the good people are treated like sheep, and if the try to get engaged/informed/or question authority...they are struck down....third world mentality...in this case...ruled by corrupt dutch regime...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:36:28 AM
Good Night All!

Goodnight Hotping!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 28, 2009, 02:39:08 AM
good night texasmom, Cageman, Icehawk, Anna and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hang in there...There Will be Justice for Natalee!!!SM cage and all the monkeys coming up on almost 4 years seeking Justice...make me a true believer!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 28, 2009, 02:41:18 AM
good night texasmom, Cageman, Icehawk, Anna and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hang in there...There Will be Justice for Natalee!!!SM cage and all the monkeys coming up on almost 4 years seeking Justice...make me a true believer!!





Goodnight Biib


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 02:45:31 AM
good night texasmom, Cageman, Icehawk, Anna and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hang in there...There Will be Justice for Natalee!!!SM cage and all the monkeys coming up on almost 4 years seeking Justice...make me a true believer!!


Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 28, 2009, 03:18:36 AM
good night texasmom, Cageman, Icehawk, Anna and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hang in there...There Will be Justice for Natalee!!!SM cage and all the monkeys coming up on almost 4 years seeking Justice...make me a true believer!!




JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 03:47:46 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/natalee11.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 03:50:47 AM




Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 28, 2009, 07:57:17 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  KTF I KNEW YOU WERE A BOY MONKEY, JUST FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE INSIDE INFORMATION  LOL............  REALLY, I JUST THOUGHT YOU WERE BY THE WAY YOU POST.

ON MY WAY OUT THE DOOR, KY IS DECLARED AN EMERGENCY STATE....... IT SOUNDS LIKE SHOTGUNS GOING OFF IN THE WOODS BEHIND ME WITH THE TREE BRANCHES SNAPPING.  NOT AS BAD AS THE 1994 ICE STORM BUT STILL UNSETTLING.

PRAYING FOR ALL MONKEYS THAT ARE IN THE AFFECTED AREAS.  BIG DAY AHEAD OF ME AT WORK BUT I WILL CHECK IN LATER. 

STILL HERE FOR NATALEE.  WE WANT THE TRUTH AND JUSTICE.  BRING NATALEE HOME.

GOOD DAY TO ALL, STAY SAFE AND WARM!!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 28, 2009, 08:03:49 AM
new pic

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/VALkopie.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 28, 2009, 08:11:10 AM
Does she have undies on ?   ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 28, 2009, 08:11:43 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  KTF I KNEW YOU WERE A BOY MONKEY, JUST FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE INSIDE INFORMATION  LOL............  REALLY, I JUST THOUGHT YOU WERE BY THE WAY YOU POST.

ON MY WAY OUT THE DOOR, KY IS DECLARED AN EMERGENCY STATE....... IT SOUNDS LIKE SHOTGUNS GOING OFF IN THE WOODS BEHIND ME WITH THE TREE BRANCHES SNAPPING.  NOT AS BAD AS THE 1994 ICE STORM BUT STILL UNSETTLING.

PRAYING FOR ALL MONKEYS THAT ARE IN THE AFFECTED AREAS.  BIG DAY AHEAD OF ME AT WORK BUT I WILL CHECK IN LATER. 

STILL HERE FOR NATALEE.  WE WANT THE TRUTH AND JUSTICE.  BRING NATALEE HOME.

GOOD DAY TO ALL, STAY SAFE AND WARM!!




State of Emergency is correct.  It is a wild ride. But I still have electricity where LOTS do not.  They are housing people in churches, schools etc. just to keep them warm.

I see some have been threatened now.  How sad.  I didn't know you could file a "cease and dissist " order against an internet user name (which I assume is not your true name).  Amazing.  Kermit, bring it on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 08:56:14 AM
SS wrote:
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
----------------------


OMG!!!!!!  I left here last night laughing thanks to Tib.  And now first thing this morning I get another good laugh!

Thanks SS!!!!!  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Would you like reference to a good attorney to straighten you out on this?  I have an EXCELLENT one!

'Course, I don't think you'll like what she has to say about your chances...........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 28, 2009, 09:18:49 AM
is it a On topic day today ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 28, 2009, 09:26:32 AM
is it a On topic day today ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::

Let's make it about Natalee today.  Sounds good to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 09:34:36 AM
Sounds good to me too............

Let's get back to Jeannette Richardson for a moment.

She was Head of Staffing, wouldn't that mean she determined who worked what/where?

Remember vd straten headed up the investigation, until he "retired" in July 2005, and then Jeannette's hubby took over - Richardson.

Remember also the recent accusations about a less than stellar ALE team that was assigned to this case?

I wonder just WHO assigned that team?  Jeannette Richardson, by chance?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 10:14:22 AM
Aruba
CBA: Capacity utilization hotels sharply lower
27 Jan, 2009, 14:36 (GMT -04:00)


 
The occupancy rate of hotels in the month of November last year was significantly lower than in the same period in 2007

ORANGE CITY-The average occupancy rate of hotels in November last year 71 percent, almost 10 percent lower than in the same period in 2007. This is reflected in the summary of the monthly report of the Central Bank of Aruba (CBA) on November 2008.

The data on the average occupancy rate of hotels have been provided by the Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS). They leave in November 2008 show a decrease of 8.9 percent. The Cruise Tourism Authority (CTA) in November 2008 a further decrease of 6.7 percent recorded in the number of cruise passengers. The number of vessels fell by 8.6 percent, compared with the corresponding month in 2007.

The provisional figures on the number of tourists to an increase of 4 percent seen in the first eleven months of 2008 compared with 10.3 per cent in the corresponding period of 2007. Figures from the CBS in November 2008 to an increase of 12.2 percent seen in the corrected number of passengers arrived through the airport, compared with the same period a year earlier.

CBA indicates that the growth of consumer spending is still slowing down to. This is supported by the figures on growth in consumer loans. The growth of consumer credit came in the first eleven months of 2008 from 4.2 percent, compared with growth of 6.2 per cent in the corresponding period of 2007. The income tax on company convert (BBO), adjusted for inflation, showed a decline of 2.4 percent in the month of November 2008, compared with the corresponding month of 2007.

In November last year, the consumer price index (CPI) increased by 4.4 percent compared with the corresponding month of 2007. The average twelve month inflation accelerated to 9 percent, compared with 5.4 percent in November 2007. The difference in inflation in the United States rose to 4.8 percentage points, compared with 2.6 percentage points in November 2007. Without water, electricity and gasoline to count increased the twelve month inflation in November this year by 0.7 percentage point to 5.4 percent, compared with the corresponding period a year earlier.

Money
In November 2008, the money supply increased by 51.1 million florin or 1.8 percent to 2889.7 million, due to an increase in net domestic assets of 56.5 million florin, which was partially offset by a net outflow of currency abroad abroad of 5.4 million florin. The net foreign asset fell to 1024.7 million at the end of November 2008. This is 297.8 million or 41 percent higher than the amount registered in the corresponding month of 2007.

The increase in net domestic asset was mainly caused by an increase of 33.2 million florin in the net assets of the banking sector on the
public sector, due to a decrease in bank deposits of the government.
Loans to businesses, consumer loans and residential mortgages increased by 10.4 million, 3.5 million and 2.5 million florin. The non-to-bank lending-related activities rose by 9.9 million florin.

Changes in the money supply in November 2008 (in millions florin):

1. Net foreign asset -5.4
2. Net domestic asset 56.5
      a. Net claims on the public sector 33.2
      b. Lending to businesses 10.4
      c. Consumer credit 3.5
      d. Residential mortgages 2.5
      e. Other receivables banking -3.0
      f. Not-to-credit-related activities 9.9
3. 51.1 Net change money

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52009.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 10:31:49 AM
Sounds good to me too............

Let's get back to Jeannette Richardson for a moment.

She was Head of Staffing, wouldn't that mean she determined who worked what/where?

Remember vd straten headed up the investigation, until he "retired" in July 2005, and then Jeannette's hubby took over - Richardson.

Remember also the recent accusations about a less than stellar ALE team that was assigned to this case?

I wonder just WHO assigned that team?  Jeannette Richardson, by chance?



Most agencies/organizations/companies do not allow immediate members of the same family to work in the same area like this.
I find this very strange.  Also the fact that the extra "carnival" police were assigned to this case I think was a sort of inside joke or insult to the case as well.

Good Morning, Monkeys! 

Drinking coffee and reading about.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 28, 2009, 10:44:49 AM
Good Morning, Caps,

Can you help us to clear any of this up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 10:59:20 AM
Sounds good to me too............

Let's get back to Jeannette Richardson for a moment.

She was Head of Staffing, wouldn't that mean she determined who worked what/where?

Remember vd straten headed up the investigation, until he "retired" in July 2005, and then Jeannette's hubby took over - Richardson.

Remember also the recent accusations about a less than stellar ALE team that was assigned to this case?

I wonder just WHO assigned that team?  Jeannette Richardson, by chance?



Most agencies/organizations/companies do not allow immediate members of the same family to work in the same area like this.
I find this very strange.  Also the fact that the extra "carnival" police were assigned to this case I think was a sort of inside joke or insult to the case as well.

Good Morning, Monkeys! 

Drinking coffee and reading about.



Glad I'm not the only one who does!!

Interesting also if you think about it...............last January (IIRC) Gelien was trying to tell Mos her "story", and had to be referred to Richardson - as it was Richardson thru whom ALL information/evidence was flowing to the OM's office.  (I know Janet has that article somewhere)

Richardson would also be the ONLY person (if we are to believe that) who would have interviewed this pond "witness" then as well.  NOT Clyde Burke.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 11:06:40 AM
Aruba
Renaissance Aruba Resort and Casino
 Traveler Reviews
Free Night + $100 Dining Credit   $167
 per night 

 $755
flight + 4 nights



Aruba
Holiday Inn SunSpree Aruba Beach Resort and Casino
 Traveler Reviews
Save up to 40%  $122
 per night 

 $622
flight + 4 nights




Bargains, bargains everywhere.




The only thing that bothers me about all this decline in tourism is that I think
they might try to use that as an excuse for not doing anything on this
investigation.  Say they don't have the money to pay for the manpower to
actually check anything out.

One excuse is just about as good as another, however.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 11:07:15 AM
Sounds good to me too............

Let's get back to Jeannette Richardson for a moment.

She was Head of Staffing, wouldn't that mean she determined who worked what/where?

Remember vd straten headed up the investigation, until he "retired" in July 2005, and then Jeannette's hubby took over - Richardson.

Remember also the recent accusations about a less than stellar ALE team that was assigned to this case?

I wonder just WHO assigned that team?  Jeannette Richardson, by chance?



Most agencies/organizations/companies do not allow immediate members of the same family to work in the same area like this.
I find this very strange.  Also the fact that the extra "carnival" police were assigned to this case I think was a sort of inside joke or insult to the case as well.

Good Morning, Monkeys! 

Drinking coffee and reading about.



Glad I'm not the only one who does!!

Interesting also if you think about it...............last January (IIRC) Gelien was trying to tell Mos her "story", and had to be referred to Richardson - as it was Richardson thru whom ALL information/evidence was flowing to the OM's office.  (I know Janet has that article somewhere)

Richardson would also be the ONLY person (if we are to believe that) who would have interviewed this pond "witness" then as well.  NOT Clyde Burke.

I found it strange too, jen and Anna!  I've been trying to reason that one out; but I guess I should know better than trying to make sense of it...after all it is Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 11:10:50 AM


I found it strange too, jen and Anna!  I've been trying to reason that one out; but I guess I should know better than trying to make sense of it...after all it is Aruba.

I think what raises my hinky meter the most about it, is that Dolphi's role was kept SO quiet, for SO long.

All we heard from/about after vd straten left was Dompig.  When as it turns out, it was Richardson all along who was pulling the strings - with Dompig merely in the public eye.

Why hide who was really in charge of the investigation for so long?

Why hide that his wife was (from all I've been able to find) the one making staffing decisions?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 11:15:13 AM
Yes, Mos seems to be becoming notorious for refusing to meet with people.  Not only did he refer Gelien to Richardson but he refused to meet with Tim Miller and then in his press conference is whining about not receiving the polygraph results.

At least that is the way I remember it.  I don't have Janet's superb filing system and am dependent on my memory for things like this.

And even before receiving those results, Mos as deemed this witness not credible.  I wonder on what basis he made that determination.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 11:19:10 AM
Yes, Mos seems to be becoming notorious for refusing to meet with people.  Not only did he refer Gelien to Richardson but he refused to meet with Tim Miller and then in his press conference is whining about not receiving the polygraph results.

At least that is the way I remember it.  I don't have Janet's superb filing system and am dependent on my memory for things like this.

And even before receiving those results, Mos as deemed this witness not credible.  I wonder on what basis he made that determination.



Can't you just see him stomping his foot saying "NO, I WILL NOT MEET WITH YOU!"  lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MosHansOM1-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 28, 2009, 11:19:20 AM
What was Dolph Richardson's title?
I have heard Van der Stratten and Dompig referred to
as both Police Chief and Police Commissioner.

I think ALE is just a fly by the seat of the pants organization.
No rules really apply.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 11:20:19 AM


I found it strange too, jen and Anna!  I've been trying to reason that one out; but I guess I should know better than trying to make sense of it...after all it is Aruba.

I think what raises my hinky meter the most about it, is that Dolphi's role was kept SO quiet, for SO long.

All we heard from/about after vd straten left was Dompig.  When as it turns out, it was Richardson all along who was pulling the strings - with Dompig merely in the public eye.

Why hide who was really in charge of the investigation for so long?

Why hide that his wife was (from all I've been able to find) the one making staffing decisions?


But it was Richardson who came here to meet with Bachus along with AHATA or ATA Rep Arlene, right?  That should have been a clue.

Maybe they felt Dompig was the better PR person or had better English.  I always remember Dompig that time he was complaining about what Beth thought of him.  It was the most unprofessional interview of a LE officer I have ever seen in my life!

And now some want him to return as Chief because he is "tremendous"!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 11:27:24 AM
Yes, Mos seems to be becoming notorious for refusing to meet with people.  Not only did he refer Gelien to Richardson but he refused to meet with Tim Miller and then in his press conference is whining about not receiving the polygraph results.

At least that is the way I remember it.  I don't have Janet's superb filing system and am dependent on my memory for things like this.

And even before receiving those results, Mos as deemed this witness not credible.  I wonder on what basis he made that determination.



Can't you just see him stomping his foot saying "NO, I WILL NOT MEET WITH YOU!"  lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MosHansOM1-1.jpg)


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


I can!  Looks particularly strange on someone of his height.


Remember, he also refused to meet with Greta.  That's what I mean by a pattern of refusing to meet with people about this investigation.  Guess he is afraid they will figure out that there is not one.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 11:27:47 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

 ::MonkeyShocked::

SS ... I do not have a clue what you are talking about.  Please direct me to my posts that offended you personally.
Thank you.

Janet

SS ... my request as been ignored.  How am I suppose to defend myself against "your" accusation that I made making "false and libelous statements" against you.

I am on a mission to explore all the happenings encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... John Silvetti's partipation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... a coverup that may have resulted in a lost opportunity to bring Natalee Holloway home to her family ... home to rest on American soil.

Nevertheless ... I apologize if my words gave the impression that I was attacking you personally.  That was not my intention.  The topic encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking is my focus.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 11:28:05 AM
Here is what looks to have been a direct tie between Jeannette Richardson and Jan vd Straten.

And note the date Jan was still a member of this committe - WELL after he was supposed to be off the island and in Bonaire.

This appears to be a supporting connection between those two and the MEP party......

Also another interesting last name seems to have popped up on this committee as well.....



http://www.arubachamber.com/ComisionBonBoluntad.htm

COMISION BON BOLUNTAD ta un initiativa di gremionan comercial y sindical - den cuadro di nan responsabilidad civico - pa duna aporte na e proceso electoral y e sistema democratico arubano. E comision tabata activo durante e eleccionnan pa miembro di Parlamento na aña 1994, 1997 y 2001. Na april 2005 e comision a worde re-activa en conexión cu proximo eleccion, oficialmente stipula pa dia 23 di september 2005. E comision ta consisti di siete miembro y ta traha a base voluntario. Na final lo tene un evaluacion di e campaña electoral 2005.

aim of the comision:

*for give one contribucion at one campaña electoral clean, transparente y of level halto;

*garantiza oportunidad equal for cada faction politico;

*evita actonan of violencia, destruccion or cu is stroba faction politico of
funciona.

tarea of the comision:

* stipula reglanan of conducta for her period of campaña;

* monitor the campaña electoral y colecta datos financiero of the campaña;

*close one econvenio voluntario cu the partidonan politico cu will participa at eleccion day 23 of september 2005;

*deal kehonan tocante the reglanan of conducta y the campaña electoral provided that general;

*sanciona violacionnan of the convenio voluntario by denuncia publico;

*publica one evaluacion of the proceso electoral y the relato financiero of campaña.

Members of Commission:


Dunador di trabao Ebby Arends – presidente di CBB
Lisette Malmberg – suplente


Sindicato: Jose Giron
Sixto Vrolijk – suplente


Enseñanza: Lydia Emerencia – vice presidente
Angelo Brete – suplente


Clero: Pader J. v/d Lee
Pader S. Tomasik – suplente


Cuerpo Policial: Jeannette Richardson
Jan v/d Straten – suplente



Secretario: Lorraine de Souza


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 11:29:02 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS.

Life outside the cage beckons this morning.

Later, Janet
8:30 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 11:31:15 AM
Here is what looks to have been a direct tie between Jeannette Richardson and Jan vd Straten.

And note the date Jan was still a member of this committe - WELL after he was supposed to be off the island and in Bonaire.

This appears to be a supporting connection between those two and the MEP party......

Also another interesting last name seems to have popped up on this committee as well.....



http://www.arubachamber.com/ComisionBonBoluntad.htm

COMISION BON BOLUNTAD ta un initiativa di gremionan comercial y sindical - den cuadro di nan responsabilidad civico - pa duna aporte na e proceso electoral y e sistema democratico arubano. E comision tabata activo durante e eleccionnan pa miembro di Parlamento na aña 1994, 1997 y 2001. Na april 2005 e comision a worde re-activa en conexión cu proximo eleccion, oficialmente stipula pa dia 23 di september 2005. E comision ta consisti di siete miembro y ta traha a base voluntario. Na final lo tene un evaluacion di e campaña electoral 2005.

aim of the comision:

*for give one contribucion at one campaña electoral clean, transparente y of level halto;

*garantiza oportunidad equal for cada faction politico;

*evita actonan of violencia, destruccion or cu is stroba faction politico of
funciona.

tarea of the comision:

* stipula reglanan of conducta for her period of campaña;

* monitor the campaña electoral y colecta datos financiero of the campaña;

*close one econvenio voluntario cu the partidonan politico cu will participa at eleccion day 23 of september 2005;

*deal kehonan tocante the reglanan of conducta y the campaña electoral provided that general;

*sanciona violacionnan of the convenio voluntario by denuncia publico;

*publica one evaluacion of the proceso electoral y the relato financiero of campaña.

Members of Commission:


Dunador di trabao Ebby Arends – presidente di CBB
Lisette Malmberg – suplente


Sindicato: Jose Giron
Sixto Vrolijk – suplente


Enseñanza: Lydia Emerencia – vice presidente
Angelo Brete – suplente


Clero: Pader J. v/d Lee
Pader S. Tomasik – suplente


Cuerpo Policial: Jeannette Richardson
Jan v/d Straten – suplente



Secretario: Lorraine de Souza

Oh - and there's another last name in there that looks to be suspiciously similar to a last name Jossy recently let fly..................If I'm not mistaken.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 11:32:48 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

 ::MonkeyShocked::

SS ... I do not have a clue what you are talking about.  Please direct me to my posts that offended you personally.
Thank you.

Janet

SS ... my request as been ignored.  How am I suppose to defend myself against "your" accusation that I made making "false and libelous statements" against you.

I am on a mission to explore all the happenings encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... John Silvetti's partipation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... a coverup that may have resulted in a lost opportunity to bring Natalee Holloway home to her family ... home to rest on American soil.

Nevertheless ... I apologize if my words gave the impression that I was attacking you personally.  That was not my intention.  The topic encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking is my focus.

Janet


Why the hell would you apologize? What kind of "personal injury" can one inflict on an internet nickname????????????????????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 11:41:53 AM
is it a On topic day today ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::

Let's make it about Natalee today.  Sounds good to me.

Blue Moon

The deception encompassing the deception of the Persistence undertaking is "all about Natalee".  If ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... Natalee Holloway's remains were placed in that cage/trap ... my heart breaks for her family.

Considering the domino effect of accountability dictates that justice for Natalee Holloway will never come out of an Aruban/Dutch courtrooom ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking ... accoring to Kyle Kingman's own words ... implies there will never be complete closure for her family.  However ... if it can be determined/exposed that Natalee Holloway's remains were placed in that cage/trap ... maybe a measure of closure would be afforded the family.

Sincerely, Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 11:44:39 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

 ::MonkeyShocked::

SS ... I do not have a clue what you are talking about.  Please direct me to my posts that offended you personally.
Thank you.

Janet

SS ... my request as been ignored.  How am I suppose to defend myself against "your" accusation that I made making "false and libelous statements" against you.

I am on a mission to explore all the happenings encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... John Silvetti's partipation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... a coverup that may have resulted in a lost opportunity to bring Natalee Holloway home to her family ... home to rest on American soil.

Nevertheless ... I apologize if my words gave the impression that I was attacking you personally.  That was not my intention.  The topic encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking is my focus.

Janet


Why the hell would you apologize? What kind of "personal injury" can one inflict on an internet nickname????????????????????????????

Good Mornnig Wreck.

The important words of my post was "IF".

Later, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 11:48:12 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

 ::MonkeyShocked::

SS ... I do not have a clue what you are talking about.  Please direct me to my posts that offended you personally.
Thank you.

Janet

SS ... my request as been ignored.  How am I suppose to defend myself against "your" accusation that I made making "false and libelous statements" against you.

I am on a mission to explore all the happenings encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... John Silvetti's partipation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... a coverup that may have resulted in a lost opportunity to bring Natalee Holloway home to her family ... home to rest on American soil.

Nevertheless ... I apologize if my words gave the impression that I was attacking you personally.  That was not my intention.  The topic encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking is my focus.

Janet


Why the hell would you apologize? What kind of "personal injury" can one inflict on an internet nickname????????????????????????????

Good Mornnig Wreck.

The important words of my post was "IF".

Later, Janet
So noted. My main intent was to emphasize my second point. (I'm not saying you did ANYTHING wrong)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 28, 2009, 11:48:33 AM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS

 ::MonkeyShocked::

SS ... I do not have a clue what you are talking about.  Please direct me to my posts that offended you personally.
Thank you.

Janet

SS ... my request as been ignored.  How am I suppose to defend myself against "your" accusation that I made making "false and libelous statements" against you.

I am on a mission to explore all the happenings encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... John Silvetti's partipation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... a coverup that may have resulted in a lost opportunity to bring Natalee Holloway home to her family ... home to rest on American soil.

Nevertheless ... I apologize if my words gave the impression that I was attacking you personally.  That was not my intention.  The topic encompassing ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking is my focus.

Janet


Why the hell would you apologize? What kind of "personal injury" can one inflict on an internet nickname????????????????????????????

I agree, Wreck!
It hurt my heart to see Janet apologizing.
I think everybody here was fairly kind, considering all the
accusations that SS was hurling.
Are Monkeys just suppose to sit and take it without any
response?   I don't think so!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 11:51:15 AM
Here is what looks to have been a direct tie between Jeannette Richardson and Jan vd Straten.

And note the date Jan was still a member of this committe - WELL after he was supposed to be off the island and in Bonaire.

This appears to be a supporting connection between those two and the MEP party......

Also another interesting last name seems to have popped up on this committee as well.....



http://www.arubachamber.com/ComisionBonBoluntad.htm

COMISION BON BOLUNTAD ta un initiativa di gremionan comercial y sindical - den cuadro di nan responsabilidad civico - pa duna aporte na e proceso electoral y e sistema democratico arubano. E comision tabata activo durante e eleccionnan pa miembro di Parlamento na aña 1994, 1997 y 2001. Na april 2005 e comision a worde re-activa en conexión cu proximo eleccion, oficialmente stipula pa dia 23 di september 2005. E comision ta consisti di siete miembro y ta traha a base voluntario. Na final lo tene un evaluacion di e campaña electoral 2005.

aim of the comision:

*for give one contribucion at one campaña electoral clean, transparente y of level halto;

*garantiza oportunidad equal for cada faction politico;

*evita actonan of violencia, destruccion or cu is stroba faction politico of
funciona.

tarea of the comision:

* stipula reglanan of conducta for her period of campaña;

* monitor the campaña electoral y colecta datos financiero of the campaña;

*close one econvenio voluntario cu the partidonan politico cu will participa at eleccion day 23 of september 2005;

*deal kehonan tocante the reglanan of conducta y the campaña electoral provided that general;

*sanciona violacionnan of the convenio voluntario by denuncia publico;

*publica one evaluacion of the proceso electoral y the relato financiero of campaña.

Members of Commission:


Dunador di trabao Ebby Arends – presidente di CBB
Lisette Malmberg – suplente


Sindicato: Jose Giron
Sixto Vrolijk – suplente


Enseñanza: Lydia Emerencia – vice presidente
Angelo Brete – suplente


Clero: Pader J. v/d Lee
Pader S. Tomasik – suplente


Cuerpo Policial: Jeannette Richardson
Jan v/d Straten – suplente



Secretario: Lorraine de Souza

Oh - and there's another last name in there that looks to be suspiciously similar to a last name Jossy recently let fly..................If I'm not mistaken.  ::MonkeyWink::

Good Morning Monkey's!I'm starting to get the feeling Caps is friendly with many in ALE.Not just Clyde Burke.If this is true.How unfortunate!Headed to the store.Be back shortly!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 28, 2009, 11:51:35 AM
is it a On topic day today ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::

Let's make it about Natalee today.  Sounds good to me.

Blue Moon

The deception encompassing the deception of the Persistence undertaking is "all about Natalee".  If ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... Natalee Holloway's remains were placed in that cage/trap ... my heart breaks for her family.

Considering the domino effect of accountability dictates that justice for Natalee Holloway will never come out of an Aruban/Dutch courtrooom ... the deception of the Persistence undertaking ... accoring to Kyle Kingman's own words ... implies there will never be complete closure for her family.  However ... if it can be determined/exposed that Natalee Holloway's remains were placed in that cage/trap ... maybe a measure of closure would be afforded the family.

Sincerely, Janet



Oh Janet. Please don't take my statement wrong about making this about Natalee.  I meant we keep getting interrupted so much lately and offtrack when we do discuss Natalee and the Persistence with all this WA WA crap about I, I, You, WE and we just don't hear about Natalee, Beth or Dave from the CnG gang. 

I believe whole heartedly that something very very bad occured with that cage and the remains (whoever those remains belong to).

Shame on you for hurting someone's reputation.  Don't you know better than hurt an internet "Name" that way? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 11:52:43 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Funny/indexmonket.png)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:17:51 PM
The connections in Aruba still continue to amaze me.  I didn't realize Dolphi Richardson's wife also worked for ALE. 

As for the Persistence, given the things posted by OE/Kyle, wouldn't it be a very simple matter to state that he was mistaken or that he stands by his posts?  End of problem?

I don't understand why some want this to be ignored.  We didn't start it, Kyle did with his accusations of what happened and who caused it.

And there still has been no arrests of anybody at all, at least not reported.

If people are just stating a theory, it should be expressed as such and not stated as a hard, concrete fact.

IMHOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 12:24:28 PM
The connections in Aruba still continue to amaze me.  I didn't realize Dolphi Richardson's wife also worked for ALE. 

As for the Persistence, given the things posted by OE/Kyle, wouldn't it be a very simple matter to state that he was mistaken or that he stands by his posts?  End of problem?

I don't understand why some want this to be ignored.  We didn't start it, Kyle did with his accusations of what happened and who caused it.

And there still has been no arrests of anybody at all, at least not reported.

If people are just stating a theory, it should be expressed as such and not stated as a hard, concrete fact.

IMHOO

Agreed Anna.So how friendly were the Richardson's with Sarah Mansur(Van Der Startten's secretary and her husband?Does anyone specifically know whom that is?TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:26:05 PM
I don't even know what is on topic any more or where we are with the search for justice for Natalee.

So what actually is happening now that we know about?

1.  Rob said TJ Ward gave the tapes to Greta that are about Paulus and some Colombians.  Whatever happened with that?

2.  Mos says he does not have the polygraph results and refused to meet with Tim Miller earlier.

3.  JQK went to Aruba early this month.  We don't know why.

4.  Mos says the pond witness is not credible.  Does this mean he is not going to do anything at all with that information?

5.  We have learned that only ALE had access to the contents of the fish trap and they are saying nothing there to see, move along, move along.

6.  Kalpoe trial seems to progress at a snail's pace with little to nothing actually happening in that regard.  Motions, continuations, etc. only.  Joran is to be believed when he says they know nothing and have nothing to do with Natalee and yet he is not to be believed in any other regard.

Several people have indicated something is happening behind the scenes.  What could it be and when will it come to light?

Is this about it?

Can anyone add something I missed? 

I would like to hear the tapes Greta has but so far she has not even mentioned them I don't believe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 12:28:52 PM
I don't even know what is on topic any more or where we are with the search for justice for Natalee.

So what actually is happening now that we know about?

1.  Rob said TJ Ward gave the tapes to Greta that are about Paulus and some Colombians.  Whatever happened with that?

2.  Mos says he does not have the polygraph results and refused to meet with Tim Miller earlier.

3.  JQK went to Aruba early this month.  We don't know why.

4.  Mos says the pond witness is not credible.  Does this mean he is not going to do anything at all with that information?

5.  We have learned that only ALE had access to the contents of the fish trap and they are saying nothing there to see, move along, move along.

6.  Kalpoe trial seems to progress at a snail's pace with little to nothing actually happening in that regard.  Motions, continuations, etc. only.  Joran is to be believed when he says they know nothing and have nothing to do with Natalee and yet he is not to be believed in any other regard.

Several people have indicated something is happening behind the scenes.  What could it be and when will it come to light?

Is this about it?

Can anyone add something I missed? 

I would like to hear the tapes Greta has but so far she has not even mentioned them I don't believe.
That pretty much sums it up for me!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 12:32:16 PM
I don't even know what is on topic any more or where we are with the search for justice for Natalee.

So what actually is happening now that we know about?

1.  Rob said TJ Ward gave the tapes to Greta that are about Paulus and some Colombians.  Whatever happened with that?

2.  Mos says he does not have the polygraph results and refused to meet with Tim Miller earlier.

3.  JQK went to Aruba early this month.  We don't know why.

4.  Mos says the pond witness is not credible.  Does this mean he is not going to do anything at all with that information?

5.  We have learned that only ALE had access to the contents of the fish trap and they are saying nothing there to see, move along, move along.

6.  Kalpoe trial seems to progress at a snail's pace with little to nothing actually happening in that regard.  Motions, continuations, etc. only.  Joran is to be believed when he says they know nothing and have nothing to do with Natalee and yet he is not to be believed in any other regard.

Several people have indicated something is happening behind the scenes.  What could it be and when will it come to light?

Is this about it?

Can anyone add something I missed? 

I would like to hear the tapes Greta has but so far she has not even mentioned them I don't believe.

Greta doing the whole Joran interview with no real follow-up is interesting.Are they waiting for something in particular?I'm waiting to hopefully hear those Tj Ward tapes.Timing is everything though.keeping Natalee in the media spotlight this long is a blessing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 28, 2009, 12:38:53 PM
I don't even know what is on topic any more or where we are with the search for justice for Natalee.

So what actually is happening now that we know about?

1.  Rob said TJ Ward gave the tapes to Greta that are about Paulus and some Colombians.  Whatever happened with that?

2.  Mos says he does not have the polygraph results and refused to meet with Tim Miller earlier.

3.  JQK went to Aruba early this month.  We don't know why.

4.  Mos says the pond witness is not credible.  Does this mean he is not going to do anything at all with that information?

5.  We have learned that only ALE had access to the contents of the fish trap and they are saying nothing there to see, move along, move along.

6.  Kalpoe trial seems to progress at a snail's pace with little to nothing actually happening in that regard.  Motions, continuations, etc. only.  Joran is to be believed when he says they know nothing and have nothing to do with Natalee and yet he is not to be believed in any other regard.

Several people have indicated something is happening behind the scenes.  What could it be and when will it come to light?

Is this about it?

Can anyone add something I missed? 

I would like to hear the tapes Greta has but so far she has not even mentioned them I don't believe.

You forgot a bunch of monkeys and former monkeys got their panties in a wad, because we exposed the fact that they don't know any more than we do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 12:41:24 PM
I don't even know what is on topic any more or where we are with the search for justice for Natalee.

So what actually is happening now that we know about?

1.  Rob said TJ Ward gave the tapes to Greta that are about Paulus and some Colombians.  Whatever happened with that?

2.  Mos says he does not have the polygraph results and refused to meet with Tim Miller earlier.

3.  JQK went to Aruba early this month.  We don't know why.

4.  Mos says the pond witness is not credible.  Does this mean he is not going to do anything at all with that information?

5.  We have learned that only ALE had access to the contents of the fish trap and they are saying nothing there to see, move along, move along.

6.  Kalpoe trial seems to progress at a snail's pace with little to nothing actually happening in that regard.  Motions, continuations, etc. only.  Joran is to be believed when he says they know nothing and have nothing to do with Natalee and yet he is not to be believed in any other regard.

Several people have indicated something is happening behind the scenes.  What could it be and when will it come to light?

Is this about it?

Can anyone add something I missed? 

I would like to hear the tapes Greta has but so far she has not even mentioned them I don't believe.

You forgot a bunch of monkeys and former monkeys got their panties in a wad, because we exposed the fact that they don't know any more than we do.

Ree is right Anna. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 28, 2009, 12:42:53 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes, Ree, that too!


I also forgot the movie for Lifetime that will be coming out in just a few months.

This will put Natalee back in the media for sure.

The choices of who is to play the parts seemed exceptionally good to me.

So that's a biggie, too.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 01:03:45 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes, Ree, that too!


I also forgot the movie for Lifetime that will be coming out in just a few months.

This will put Natalee back in the media for sure.

The choices of who is to play the parts seemed exceptionally good to me.

So that's a biggie, too.

.

Thanks for the reminder about the movie, Anna.  That is supposed to be in April, sometime. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 01:05:43 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes, Ree, that too!


I also forgot the movie for Lifetime that will be coming out in just a few months.

This will put Natalee back in the media for sure.

The choices of who is to play the parts seemed exceptionally good to me.

So that's a biggie, too.

.

Thanks for the reminder about the movie, Anna.  That is supposed to be in April, sometime. 

2NJ - can you help me post a picture?  I emailed it to klaas, but I think my timing was bad.

I have not a clue how to do it - but I do have a link  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:16:27 PM
CONTACT LIJST DIVISIE STAF: (xxx) xxx-xxx 
DIVISION NAME TEL OR EXT  FAX
Hoofd Staf Korpschef  Jeannette Richardson   ext:
Bureau Interne Zaken en Onderzoeken   
Algemeen Beleidsmedewerker  Errol Zebeda  ext:
Juridisch Beleidsmedewerker  Arlene Franken-Thode  ext:
PR en Voorlichting  Edwin Comenencia  ext
Interpol Johnny Tromp  


http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 01:18:24 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes, Ree, that too!


I also forgot the movie for Lifetime that will be coming out in just a few months.

This will put Natalee back in the media for sure.

The choices of who is to play the parts seemed exceptionally good to me.

So that's a biggie, too.

.

Thanks for the reminder about the movie, Anna.  That is supposed to be in April, sometime. 

2NJ - can you help me post a picture?  I emailed it to klaas, but I think my timing was bad.

I have not a clue how to do it - but I do have a link  ::MonkeyConfused::

Jen,

When posting, paste your link & highlight it, then go to the buttons provided above your message.  The second from the bottom left is 'insert image'.  Click on that and it should be okay.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 01:22:31 PM


Jen,

When posting, paste your link & highlight it, then go to the buttons provided above your message.  The second from the bottom left is 'insert image'.  Click on that and it should be okay.

OK thank you.  Let me try.

If any monkeys can help determine what the street names are in this area, I would appreicate it.  This is the soccer field - near the Monserrat pond.

TIA!!

(http://s656.photobucket.com/albums/uu290/freebirdjustice/General/?action-view&current=Nacional-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 01:23:06 PM
 ::MonkeyConfused::  I'm guessing I did something wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 01:27:42 PM
::MonkeyConfused::  I'm guessing I did something wrong.

There is a link in photobucket for IMG....what you posted looks right to me... ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:33:15 PM
CONTACT LIJST DIVISIE STAF: (xxx) xxx-xxx 
DIVISION NAME TEL OR EXT  FAX
Hoofd Staf Korpschef  Jeannette Richardson   ext:
Bureau Interne Zaken en Onderzoeken   
Algemeen Beleidsmedewerker  Errol Zebeda  ext:
Juridisch Beleidsmedewerker  Arlene Franken-Thode  ext:
PR en Voorlichting  Edwin Comenencia  ext
Interpol Johnny Tromp  


http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html

If Paulus is friends with ol' JT he's got interpol covered.You think?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 01:33:33 PM
Let's try again.............if this doesn't work, can you please delete these two posts of mine?  No need to clutter up the cage, lol

(http://i656.photobucket.com/albums/uu290/freebirdjustice/General/Nacional-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 01:34:50 PM
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks 2NJ!!!!!!!

What I'm interested in, are the street names here................and mostly for the street with the yellow dots.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 01:46:04 PM
::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks 2NJ!!!!!!!

What I'm interested in, are the street names here................and mostly for the street with the yellow dots.

I know members like Johan have posted many similar pictures but at the moment, I'm not sure if the street names are included.  I'd have to look for them...not sure we put them all in the map section of Important Documents.  My guess is we did not.  :(    Maybe I'm wrong.  Worst case, maybe the area can be googled again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 01:52:20 PM
What a great website!

http://www.kparuba.com/index.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 02:02:37 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:04:53 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM


 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 02:07:23 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM


If you can say - was that a post from Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:13:00 PM

Aruba, Diaranzon 28 Januari 2009
now cu crisis mundial is come completa trabao of bbo
escandalo platform pio cu caso holloway
aruba is lose crebilidad cu have to evita his caida

oranjestad(aan): at the momentonan here all country is deal of present they self because; estadonan cu credibilidad for so can across the part more pisa of the crisis mundial, cu owing to anuncia his self year happen.

aruba is lose all his credibilidad. gobierno not can show the banconan foreigner earnest cu the can atende finanza of aruba. now the compania spanish also have to talk. while the situation in platform is alcanza the sharp maximo cu can owing to wait for just hour banco central is anuncia cu economia is become faint, aruba owing to lose his credibilidad cu can resulta fateful for her country!

the escandalo in platform, cu now is rementa, can have efectonan pio cu the caso natalee holloway for aruba.

esey is thing expertonan owing to adverti daily paper. if in the caso holloway already gobernacion earnest owing to become cuestionabel, now world is bay ask about his self what is type of country aruba is.

this is fateful for her country, cu without credibilidad will see door of all instancia financiero internacional earnest y right close door pe, while the market cu will open his door will is esun cu majority of country earnest is rechaza. expertonan owing to tell daily paper cu they're teme for her resultadonan cu thing is happen in platform will have for aruba. do not deal only of the interest of esnan directamente envolvi in platform or establecimento on platform but of all aruba.

 the imagen of aruba is destrosa for her manchanan cu is place on dje in the type of proyectonan here. same cu daily paper is present articulonan of paisnan caminda casonan similar owing to place the paisnan here lose they cara, is happen now cu aruba. instancianan internacional is follow the sucesonan here because is deal here of proyecto of sumanan enormous.

 besides for her proyecto here come aruba owing to break relacionnan cu two compania crucero important, cu assure have influencia enormous in exterior y in world of turism internacional. bienestar of aruba is at game cu the proyecto of platform, as informantenan owing to tell daily paper.

 they preocupacion is, cu aruba already is in one crisis social y financiero big. the escandalo of platform is the drop cu was have have to for her hemchi fill. if thing is happen at aruba y is exponi in exterior for his lazonan comercial, alcanza prensa mundial aruba is in one posicion mucho more important cu the caso holloway, expertonan owing to show

http://www.diarioaruba.com/diaranzon/noticia/news1.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:15:00 PM
CONTACT LIJST DIVISIE STAF: (xxx) xxx-xxx 
DIVISION NAME TEL OR EXT  FAX
Hoofd Staf Korpschef  Jeannette Richardson   ext:
Bureau Interne Zaken en Onderzoeken   
Algemeen Beleidsmedewerker  Errol Zebeda  ext:
Juridisch Beleidsmedewerker  Arlene Franken-Thode  ext:
PR en Voorlichting  Edwin Comenencia  ext
Interpol Johnny Tromp  


http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html

If Paulus is friends with ol' JT he's got interpol covered.You think?

What is the relationship between Dolph and Jeannette?In the KPA organizational chart she is directly below De Witte.Was that the position Van Der Stratten held?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:20:37 PM
Spanish to English Translation of Above Article


This is in Daily Aruba, Diaranzon 28 Januari 2009 now cu world crisis is eats complete joins of bbo scan it
platform I chirp cu case holloway aruba is lose crebilidad cu have to avoids his fallen

Oranjestad (aan) : at the momentonan wounds all country is deal of present they self because; estadonan cu credibility for I am can across the part dies steps of the world crisis, cu owing to announces his self year happen. 

Aruba is lose all his credibility. government not can show the banconan foreigner earnest cu the can attends finance of aruba. now the compania spanish also have to talk. while the situation in platform is reaches the sharp maximo cu can owing to wait for just hour central bank is announces cu economia is become faint, aruba owing to lose his credibility cu can results fateful for her country! 

The scan it in platform, cu now is rementa, can have efectonan I chirp cu the case natalee holloway for aruba. 

Esey is thing expertonan owing to adverti daily paper. if in the case holloway already gobernacion earnest owing to become cuestionabel, now world is bay ask about his self what is type of country aruba is. 

this is fateful for her country, cu without credibility will see door of all international financial instance earnest and right close door pe, while the market cu will bid for his door will is esun cu majority of country earnest is rejects. expertonan owing to tell daily paper cu they' re fears for her resultadonan cu thing is happen in platform will have for aruba. gave not deal only of the interest of Esnan directly envolvi in platform or establecimento on platform but of all aruba. 

The image of aruba is destrosa for her manchanan cu is tackle on dje in the type of proyectonan wounds. be me cu daily paper is present articulonan of paisnan caminda casonan similar owing to tackle the paisnan wounds lose they expensive, is happen now cu aruba. instancianan international is follow the sucesonan wounds because is deal wounds of project of sumanan enormous. 

Besides for her project wounds eats aruba owing to break relacionnan cu two compania cruiser important, cu assure have influence enormous in exterior and in world of turism international. welfare of aruba is at game cu the project of platform, ace informantenan owing to tell daily paper. 

they preocupacion is, cu aruba already is in one financial and social crisis big. the scan it of platform is the drop cu was have have to for her hemchi fill. if thing is happen at aruba and is exponi in exterior for his lazonan commercial, reaches world press aruba is in one posicion a lot dies important cu the case holloway, expertonan owing to show

http://www.diarioaruba.com/diaranzon/noticia/news1.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 02:21:22 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM


Satish Kalpoe
Witness Statement
May 31, 2005

I wore brown long trousers, a blue cap and a blue pullover.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 02:22:28 PM
CONTACT LIJST DIVISIE STAF: (xxx) xxx-xxx 
DIVISION NAME TEL OR EXT  FAX
Hoofd Staf Korpschef  Jeannette Richardson   ext:
Bureau Interne Zaken en Onderzoeken   
Algemeen Beleidsmedewerker  Errol Zebeda  ext:
Juridisch Beleidsmedewerker  Arlene Franken-Thode  ext:
PR en Voorlichting  Edwin Comenencia  ext
Interpol Johnny Tromp  


http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html

If Paulus is friends with ol' JT he's got interpol covered.You think?

What is the relationship between Dolph and Jeannette?In the KPA organizational chart she is directly below De Witte.Was that the position Van Der Stratten held?

Jeannette is Dolphi's wife.

vd straten was Commissioner.........I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 02:24:41 PM
Thanks hotping!

That is a powerful article!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 02:29:39 PM
Thanks hotping!

That is a powerful article!!
YW Jen.... Yes it is Very Interesting from what I can make out from the Translation!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:34:22 PM
Thanks hotping!

That is a powerful article!!
YW Jen.... Yes it is Very Interesting from what I can make out from the Translation!  ::MonkeyWink::

The Dirty ol' interest's of the Dutch Elite took precedence over the interest's of the Island.What shame.They have no value for a human being.JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 02:37:50 PM
CONTACT LIJST DIVISIE STAF: (xxx) xxx-xxx 
DIVISION NAME TEL OR EXT  FAX
Hoofd Staf Korpschef  Jeannette Richardson   ext:
Bureau Interne Zaken en Onderzoeken   
Algemeen Beleidsmedewerker  Errol Zebeda  ext:
Juridisch Beleidsmedewerker  Arlene Franken-Thode  ext:
PR en Voorlichting  Edwin Comenencia  ext
Interpol Johnny Tromp  


http://www.kparuba.com/contacts.html

If Paulus is friends with ol' JT he's got interpol covered.You think?

What is the relationship between Dolph and Jeannette?In the KPA organizational chart she is directly below De Witte.Was that the position Van Der Stratten held?

Jeannette is Dolphi's wife.

vd straten was Commissioner.........I think.

Thanx Jen!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 03:02:01 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM


If you can say - was that a post from Aruba?

Not Aruba and not the Netherlands or USA but further north  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 28, 2009, 03:11:18 PM
Miss Janet, did you post that? ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 03:13:42 PM
Let's try again.............if this doesn't work, can you please delete these two posts of mine?  No need to clutter up the cage, lol

(http://i656.photobucket.com/albums/uu290/freebirdjustice/General/Nacional-1.jpg)

I googled this area and thought I'd captured at least a link, but unfortunately I did not.  Anyway, I could only see two streets identified and it was the one running vertical on your pic at the tip of the red arrow.  Van Bubali Naar Noord.  This street curves and continues down from the first yellow dot to the left of the arrow.  The street of interest to you, however, was not named, that I could see from my limited map prowess.  The only other street I could see was Weg Bubali Naar Palm Beach, which was to the left of your pic and also running vertically. 

If I get a chance, I will attempt to get a screen shot or the link...unless a super map monkey does so before I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 03:23:22 PM
2NJ - Thank you so much for your efforts.

Figures the one street I'm interested in is the one being elusive!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 03:23:52 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM


If you can say - was that a post from Aruba?

Not Aruba and not the Netherlands or USA but further north  ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 03:25:10 PM
Where did Louis Schaefer put all his money??? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 03:28:42 PM
Where did Louis Schaefer put all his money??? ::MonkeyConfused::

Ah - question of the day!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 28, 2009, 03:28:53 PM
2NJ - Thank you so much for your efforts.

Figures the one street I'm interested in is the one being elusive!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

That street is called Kamerlingh Onnes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 03:31:04 PM
Where did Louis Schaefer put all his money??? ::MonkeyConfused::

I've been trying to figure that out, myself.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 03:38:26 PM
I could never discern the "blue cap" in the cage (although I did see what Anna et al were referring to), but if it WAS a cap -- that would be very significant!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 03:39:28 PM
2NJ - Thank you so much for your efforts.

Figures the one street I'm interested in is the one being elusive!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

That street is called Kamerlingh Onnes

Thanks bastibro!  Are you absoposilutely sure?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 03:39:47 PM
Where did Louis Schaefer put all his money??? ::MonkeyConfused::

Ah - question of the day!

There has to be a money trail somewhere.How do you move that kind of money without a RED-FLAG????Is Kyle working for Alpine ocean seismic survey currently,and or is he working for Schaefer or Silvetti?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 28, 2009, 03:40:00 PM
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=aruba+racquet+club&sll=12.52111,-69.968338&sspn=0.230253,0.291138&g=aruba&ie=UTF8&t=h&ei=dr-ASfT4K6b2jQP_lMzGCw&view=map&attrid=&ll=12.565863,-70.036603&spn=0.003471,0.004549&z=18


Perhaps this will show the area with one of the street names showing.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 03:41:21 PM
Where did Louis Schaefer put all his money??? ::MonkeyConfused::

I've been trying to figure that out, myself.   

Me too 2nj. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: COLOMBO on January 28, 2009, 03:45:25 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=6750266&page=1


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 03:46:55 PM
Just check for

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 03:48:49 PM
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=aruba+racquet+club&sll=12.52111,-69.968338&sspn=0.230253,0.291138&g=aruba&ie=UTF8&t=h&ei=dr-ASfT4K6b2jQP_lMzGCw&view=map&attrid=&ll=12.565863,-70.036603&spn=0.003471,0.004549&z=18


Perhaps this will show the area with one of the street names showing.....

Mere - thanks!  Jen does this help you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 28, 2009, 03:51:08 PM
2NJ - Thank you so much for your efforts.

Figures the one street I'm interested in is the one being elusive!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

That street is called Kamerlingh Onnes

Thanks bastibro!  Are you absoposilutely sure?



Jen...this link will show the second street...pull the map over to the left to see how the street curves....

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&view=map&q=Kamerlingh+Onnes,+aruba&sll=12.565863,-70.036603&sspn=0.003597,0.004549&ie=UTF8&ll=12.552302,-70.014603&spn=0.013886,0.018196&t=h&z=16


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 04:02:37 PM
2NJ - Thank you so much for your efforts.

Figures the one street I'm interested in is the one being elusive!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

That street is called Kamerlingh Onnes

Thanks bastibro!  Are you absoposilutely sure?



Jen...this link will show the second street...pull the map over to the left to see how the street curves....

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&view=map&q=Kamerlingh+Onnes,+aruba&sll=12.565863,-70.036603&sspn=0.003597,0.004549&ie=UTF8&ll=12.552302,-70.014603&spn=0.013886,0.018196&t=h&z=16

OK.............I think I found it, LOL.

Thank you so much Mere!!!!

Now.............I've found that road, and the name of it on the cross road going the other directions, so is the yellow road that crosses it going in the correct location the same name?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 04:05:50 PM
2NJ - Thank you so much for your efforts.

Figures the one street I'm interested in is the one being elusive!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

That street is called Kamerlingh Onnes

Thanks bastibro!  Are you absoposilutely sure?



Jen...this link will show the second street...pull the map over to the left to see how the street curves....

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&view=map&q=Kamerlingh+Onnes,+aruba&sll=12.565863,-70.036603&sspn=0.003597,0.004549&ie=UTF8&ll=12.552302,-70.014603&spn=0.013886,0.018196&t=h&z=16

OK.............I think I found it, LOL.

Thank you so much Mere!!!!

Now.............I've found that road, and the name of it on the cross road going the other directions, so is the yellow road that crosses it going in the correct location the same name?

Wow!!  That reads horribly!!  Lemme try that again.

The road with the name Kamerlingh Onnes runs in one direction, and crosses another highlighted road.

That other highlighted road is the I mean...............does THAT road also have the name of Kamerlingh Onnes?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 04:09:18 PM
JEN - I remembered I had these street maps:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Arubamap5.jpg)

The links below are to larger size maps, too large to post other than with the link:

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Arubamap1.jpg

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Arubamap2.jpg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 04:17:05 PM
Thanks klaas!

I think I'm becoming cross-eyed.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 04:25:46 PM
Miss Janet, did you post that? ::MonkeyRoll::

Whatcha takin about Ree.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 04:26:51 PM
jen ... this wannabe detective is speculating that there is a doc in the works.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 04:30:04 PM
jen ... this wannabe detective is speculating that there is a doc in the works.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet

Unfortunately not.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Natalee's Freebirds have disbanded - for all practical purposes.  The blog is in lock down.  No need to invite litigation to those who remain watching over the place.

No.............I'm just trying to put the pieces of a theory together, it is seemingly promising - but it just sprouted this morning.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 04:34:17 PM
jen ... this wannabe detective is speculating that there is a doc in the works.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet

Unfortunately not.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Natalee's Freebirds have disbanded - for all practical purposes.  The blog is in lock down.  No need to invite litigation to those who remain watching over the place.

No.............I'm just trying to put the pieces of a theory together, it is seemingly promising - but it just sprouted this morning.  ::MonkeyCool::

Hey ... go for it!!!  A theory/document can always be shared outside of the Natalee's Freebirds' coup.  Justice for Natalee Hollway does not have any boundaries.

Good Afternoon All!

Janet
1:35 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 04:35:36 PM
Good Afternoon Janet. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 04:37:31 PM
jen ... this wannabe detective is speculating that there is a doc in the works.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet

Unfortunately not.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Natalee's Freebirds have disbanded - for all practical purposes.  The blog is in lock down.  No need to invite litigation to those who remain watching over the place.

No.............I'm just trying to put the pieces of a theory together, it is seemingly promising - but it just sprouted this morning.  ::MonkeyCool::

Hey ... go for it!!!  A theory/document can always be shared outside of the Natalee's Freebirds' coup.  Justice for Natalee Hollway does not have any boundaries.

Good Afternoon All!

Janet
1:35 PM PT

Very true Janet..............very true!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 28, 2009, 04:37:38 PM
Posted on the front page of SM:

Quote
cc wrote:


re the cage: Satish had a blue cap on that night, if that is a cap that is in that cage.


Jan 28, 11:25 AM

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/C%20C%20Bar/CarlosandCharlies.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 04:38:50 PM
Good Afternoon Janet. ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Mr. Keepthefaith.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Is it time for another KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS reminder?

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 28, 2009, 04:40:35 PM
JEN - I remembered I had these street maps:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Arubamap5.jpg)

The links below are to larger size maps, too large to post other than with the link:

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Arubamap1.jpg

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Arubamap2.jpg
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Maps/Arubamap1.jpg)

Verharde weg van Palm Beach naar Noord now thats a long name to call a street ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 04:41:02 PM
Good Afternoon Janet. ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Mr. Keepthefaith.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Is it time for another KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS reminder?

Janet



Logic Dictates. ::MonkeyLaugh::  Also the post with Luis and John contacting Tim.Very interesting!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 04:46:09 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 04:48:56 PM
Jen ... I am very interested in your theory.  However ... I lack the research expertise required to provide backup.  Do not think for one minute when I go off in another direction that I am disregarding the your input and the input of others.

If I find I have something to offer ... you know I will be part of the dialogue lickity split.  If you believe that I can be of assistance ... you know where I am.

Hugs

OOPS!  You are not a boy Monkey are you?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 05:30:07 PM
http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3610&Itemid=1

Papiamentu Translation:

caso contra jvd sloot is follow open serca ministerio publico

wednesday, 28 january 2009 oranjestad—ministerio publico not owing to close the investigacion contra joran van der sloot in the caso of desaparicion of natalee holloway, contrario at locual de telegraaf owing to raporta yesterday. the corant dutch yesterday owing to publica cu ministerio publico of aruba owing to close the caso contra the three sospechosonan, y cu one vocero owing to tell cu motibo is miss of proof. sinembargo, locual the corant owing to raporta yesterday again was one news old of 18 of january 2007. the question is con the can is so cu one news old is go back achieve the atencion y is aparece on the rednan of ‘google-news,’ because; sifuera here is deal one desaroyo new. as can corda, comienzo of year, ministerio publico owing to as one conferencia of prensa amplio for splica where is stop in the investigacion contra the unique sospechoso in the caso, esta joran van der sloot. at the ocasion here, fiscal parent hans mos owing to tell cu till still is investigando some detaye, but owing to admiti also cu is arrive instant cu have to saca one conclusion if have sufficient motibo for continua cu the investigacion if or not. till the instant ey, ministerio publico y police was pendiente some result investigativo still, y not have one date for tell what day will close the investigacion contra van der sloot, mirando cu go back haci peticion at publico for trece cualkier informacion fast cu can is relevante for her caso come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 28, 2009, 05:32:19 PM
Jen ... I am very interested in your theory.  However ... I lack the research expertise required to provide backup.  Do not think for one minute when I go off in another direction that I am disregarding the your input and the input of others.

If I find I have something to offer ... you know I will be part of the dialogue lickity split.  If you believe that I can be of assistance ... you know where I am.

Hugs

OOPS!  You are not a boy Monkey are you?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



 ::MonkeyTongue::

Thank you Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 28, 2009, 05:34:44 PM
http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3610&Itemid=1

Papiamentu Translation:

caso contra jvd sloot is follow open serca ministerio publico

wednesday, 28 january 2009 oranjestad—ministerio publico not owing to close the investigacion contra joran van der sloot in the caso of desaparicion of natalee holloway, contrario at locual de telegraaf owing to raporta yesterday. the corant dutch yesterday owing to publica cu ministerio publico of aruba owing to close the caso contra the three sospechosonan, y cu one vocero owing to tell cu motibo is miss of proof. sinembargo, locual the corant owing to raporta yesterday again was one news old of 18 of january 2007. the question is con the can is so cu one news old is go back achieve the atencion y is aparece on the rednan of ‘google-news,’ because; sifuera here is deal one desaroyo new. as can corda, comienzo of year, ministerio publico owing to as one conferencia of prensa amplio for splica where is stop in the investigacion contra the unique sospechoso in the caso, esta joran van der sloot. at the ocasion here, fiscal parent hans mos owing to tell cu till still is investigando some detaye, but owing to admiti also cu is arrive instant cu have to saca one conclusion if have sufficient motibo for continua cu the investigacion if or not. till the instant ey, ministerio publico y police was pendiente some result investigativo still, y not have one date for tell what day will close the investigacion contra van der sloot, mirando cu go back haci peticion at publico for trece cualkier informacion fast cu can is relevante for her caso come across

I know what it says. They are closing the case becasue they just heard that filming is starting on Natalee's fabulous vacation on their Happy Little Island! (POS all of them)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 05:51:16 PM
There is not one who has posted on Natalee Holloway internet forums in almost four years that does not know beyond a doubt that Tamikosmom thinks Beth Holloway is an amazing woman and ... I put any poster in the troll category who undermines the words and actions of this mother in her quest for the truth encompassing the morning of May 30, 2005.

Beth Holloway does not lie.  Why would she lie?  Answers is what Beth's quest is all about and ... the truth does not equate lies.

Think about it.  CAPS subtly undermines the validity of Beth Holloway words and actions and ... so does the "powers that be"  and... so do those who are part of the misinformation campaign (Julia Renfro) ... who have prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo.

CAPS ... if Jug Twitty states that Aruba did not underwrite Beth and his expenses while in Aruba ... Aruba did not underwrite Beth and his expenses while in Aruba.  Case Closed!

CAPS ... If Beth Holloway states that her daughter was a virgin ... then Beth Holloway BELIEVES that her daughter was a virgin.  Beth does not lie.  Case Closed!

Janet

_________

CAPSLOCKWIZARD

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #713 1/16
« Reply #316 on: January 18, 2008, 02:18:50 AM »


Envy:

Their desire for others' traits, status, abilities, or situation. (Beth $16000.00 open bill in Aruba while they have to pay for them self. otherwise they would not bring it out)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2527.msg329723;topicseen#msg329723


CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world, NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749   


+++++++++

BACKUP TO THE CONTRARY

'Scarborough Country' for August 11
updated 6:33 a.m. PT, Fri., Aug. 12, 2005

JUG TWITTY, STEPFATHER OF NATALEE HOLLOWAY
:  But the whole thing is—is frustrating to me. Last night, I saw something on TV. It was very frustrating, when Ruben Trappenberg said something to the effect that—somebody asked him about, well, you need to pay for all of the family‘s expenses. Oh, we are. You know, everything is comped, all the cab rides, all the hotels, all the—everything.

And, you know, that‘s so frustrating to me, Joe, it‘s unbelievable. I mean, I cannot believe the man came on there and said that, because...

SCARBOROUGH: So, is he lying?

TWITTY: ... I can‘t tell you how—absolutely. They are not paying for all our things. And, yes, they have offered to help us with a couple of things, but they are not comping our rooms down there. I put Beth in a nice hotel because I wanted security in there, and the owner of the hotel was nice enough to come and give us a discount on the room, but they are not comping our rooms.

They‘re not comping—I have there in probably 70 cab rides. I have never had anybody offer me to give me a free cab ride. It‘s just unbelievable to even come and say that. And I have seen my credit card bills, if they want to pay for it. I don‘t want them to pay for it. I don‘t want the Aruban government to give me a penny. All I want to do is, I want to find Natalee and I want to go home

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8925176/


Missing White Female
Vanity Fair
January 2, 2006


Despite reports to the contrary, Dompig feels certain Natalee didn't meet Joran until her final day on Aruba, Sunday. He confirms that there have been numerous reports that she may have been involved with other young men on the island. "We have taken two statements, from Julia Renfro and a Holiday Inn worker, that Beth told them she had gotten a call from her daughter, and that she was in love with a tall, blue-eyed Dutch teenager. So [Beth] had contact with her daughter. But she denies it. The question is why. If [the Twittys] don't level with us, how can they talk about a conspiracy? We need to know the truth. Joran did not have blue eyes. So who was this boy?" Beth denies making any such statements, or even having talked with Natalee while she was in Aruba.

http://www.vanityfair.com/fame/features/2006/01/natalee200601?currentPage=9


'The Abrams Report' for April 19
updated 7:28 a.m. PT, Thurs., April. 20, 2006


ABRAMS: Beth, any truth to this, I don't know if it's rumor or report, et cetera, that Natalee had said something to you about having a crush on a blonde haired, blue eyed boy in Aruba?

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  Dan, there's just—there's no truth to that at all. You know Natalee had not called me. She didn't have international calling on her phone and no she never—her friends said that this never happened, it was never mentioned. And just simply it's just another rumor that had started and it's just not true, Dan.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12405242/


As missing-teen case cools, Aruba turns against family
Arubans helped search for the Alabama high-schooler, who disappeared two years ago, but now they're embittered by the negative publicity.
By Carol J. Williams
Los Angeles Times


American Julia Renfro, editor-in-chief of Aruba Today, initially sided with Holloway's parents when they sought publicity and lambasted Aruban police for following Dutch investigative procedures different from those in the United States.

Galvanized by compassion for a desperate mother, Renfro stopped the presses of her daily newspaper for the first time in its history to include a picture of Holloway to aid Arubans in the islandwide search.

Renfro, a mother of four, spent weeks shuttling the family from the scene of one rumored development to another, but she became disenchanted with what she saw as Twitty's pandering to tabloid TV and "flat-out lies" she told on the air.

"I feel guilty saying any negative thing about a mother who has lost her daughter," Renfro said. "But her behavior was odd from the get-go."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003741183_aruba09.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 05:51:46 PM
http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3609&Itemid=1

Papiamentu translation:

valero not sell refineria at aruba

wednesday, 28 january 2009 oranjestad – informacion give during the conferencia of prensa of the boss coorporativo of valero energy corp, bill klesse, owing to crea one impresion eroneo, y also one speculacion serious cu valero owing to as sell the refineria end of aruba or cu the had plannan concreto for haci this. good morning aruba at once owing to busca contacto cu the vocero of the refineria, cu owing to show cu owing to hear also of the rumornan, but cu oficialmente they do not comenta on rumor. the thing owing to sosode, according fuentenan of good morning aruba, is cu yesterday klesse owing to as one conferencia of prensa, cu not had mucho good informacion. the informacion principal is cu the compania owing to lose coin in his ultimo cuartal. the situation mundial of crisis owing to place cu the prijs of accion of valero owing to cay 70% during the ultimo 6 lunanan. the informacion cu aruba owing to grab y cu owing to plama in one form of one rumor, is the piece cu is show cu ‘mirando the situation bad cu is draw fast, is forza the compania for conserva coin cash, y look at in posibilidad for sell ‘algun’ refineria. the will clip his inversion cu 23% in 2009 till at 2.7 biyon, y if cos become aun more pio, descend this till at 1.8 biyon. is papiando of retiro masal of at least 5.000 trahado, y ‘lo can close refinerianan cu is below ; revision strategico if they not can owing to wordo bendi’. the sentence here owing to achieve life at aruba already cu aruba is one of the refinerianan ‘bou of revision strategico’ very time end. y mirando the version here, the rumor owing to plama cu aruba his refineria now if definitely will close his door if not succeed sell. one ad cu owing to leave publica in medionan of comunicacion yesterday, also owing to crea more life in the rumor yesterday, where cu is show cu the refineria will was tell algo ‘indirecto’ by the ad here, y was alerta comunidad for thing was at caminda. some owing to till even interpreta this because; one good-bye camufla. the part where cu is haci mencion of cu “e refineria is one good neighbour, but another paisnan is give incentivonan more atractivo cu aruba, y the is more atractivo still for procesa crudo on the costa of golfo of merca, owing to wing much atencion also. good morning aruba owing to compronde cu the news cu refineria valero will close, do not cuadra cu berdad, although cu not can owing to confirma this because the refineria owing to opta for not comenta still. have posibilidad cu in curso of today, can achieve comentario according the matutino here can owing to compronde. another informacion cu the matutino here owing to compronde is cu one are chinese interesa in compra of the refineria, still will was at aruba the week here y will owing to achieve till cu day 31 of january proximo for dicidi if they're cumpra the refineria if or not. one prijs of 1.8 biyon will owing to wordo ofreci, but cu the refineria will owing to deny the oferta here come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 05:52:58 PM
2NJSons_Mom ... please edit my last post.

... almost three years ... s/b ... almost four years ...

Thank you.

Janet

Done.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: caesu on January 28, 2009, 05:56:44 PM
http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3610&Itemid=1

Papiamentu Translation:

caso contra jvd sloot is follow open serca ministerio publico

wednesday, 28 january 2009 oranjestad—ministerio publico not owing to close the investigacion contra joran van der sloot in the caso of desaparicion of natalee holloway, contrario at locual de telegraaf owing to raporta yesterday. the corant dutch yesterday owing to publica cu ministerio publico of aruba owing to close the caso contra the three sospechosonan, y cu one vocero owing to tell cu motibo is miss of proof. sinembargo, locual the corant owing to raporta yesterday again was one news old of 18 of january 2007. the question is con the can is so cu one news old is go back achieve the atencion y is aparece on the rednan of ‘google-news,’ because; sifuera here is deal one desaroyo new. as can corda, comienzo of year, ministerio publico owing to as one conferencia of prensa amplio for splica where is stop in the investigacion contra the unique sospechoso in the caso, esta joran van der sloot. at the ocasion here, fiscal parent hans mos owing to tell cu till still is investigando some detaye, but owing to admiti also cu is arrive instant cu have to saca one conclusion if have sufficient motibo for continua cu the investigacion if or not. till the instant ey, ministerio publico y police was pendiente some result investigativo still, y not have one date for tell what day will close the investigacion contra van der sloot, mirando cu go back haci peticion at publico for trece cualkier informacion fast cu can is relevante for her caso come across

i can guess what it says here.

the Aruban OM is not closing the case yet.
this in answer to questions raised about a newspaper article that popped up at google news, but this article is more than a year old.  ::MonkeyHaHa::
someone at Bondia is very stupid for filling their newspaper with such stories.
and because they are getting the dates wrong, quoting january 18th 2008 instead of december 18th 2007.

http://news.google.nl/news?hl=nl&um=1&tab=wn&nolr=1&q=OM+stopt+zaak+verdwijning+Holloway&btnG=Nieuws+zoeken
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/81852/__OM_stopt_zaak_verdwijning_Holloway__.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 05:58:07 PM
MANSUR-CROES  BLANCA MARIANA 
MANSUR-CROES  MAGDA AGSUSENA

www.arubachamber.com/Voterslst/Website-KIEZERSLIJST%20KB%202008-2009.htm -


Are the Mansur's and the Croes families intertwined by marriage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:01:05 PM
MANSUR-CROES  BLANCA MARIANA 
MANSUR-CROES  MAGDA AGSUSENA

www.arubachamber.com/Voterslst/Website-KIEZERSLIJST%20KB%202008-2009.htm -


Are the Mansur's and the Croes families intertwined by marriage?


Keepthefaith ... I do not have clue but ... in all probability "YES"!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

______


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for April 6
updated 9:15 a.m. PT, Fri., April. 7, 2006


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE‘S MOTHER: What do you make of the fact that it‘s so strange that here‘s this guy (Boeti) who‘s his brother-in-law, Gerold Dompig? Isn‘t that weird to you, too, just that strange connection? And the fact—it was interesting. When we were down there, the authorities were sort of, like, Well, we can‘t really focus on him because of, basically, who he‘s connected to.

TWITTY: Well, you know, it‘s really not any stranger to me than it is that the Kalpoes are cousins of Gerold Dompig. So you know, they‘re all very connected on that island. It‘s hard to find someone who‘s not a relative or a cousin.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12205086/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 06:01:28 PM
http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3610&Itemid=1

Papiamentu Translation:

caso contra jvd sloot is follow open serca ministerio publico

wednesday, 28 january 2009 oranjestad—ministerio publico not owing to close the investigacion contra joran van der sloot in the caso of desaparicion of natalee holloway, contrario at locual de telegraaf owing to raporta yesterday. the corant dutch yesterday owing to publica cu ministerio publico of aruba owing to close the caso contra the three sospechosonan, y cu one vocero owing to tell cu motibo is miss of proof. sinembargo, locual the corant owing to raporta yesterday again was one news old of 18 of january 2007. the question is con the can is so cu one news old is go back achieve the atencion y is aparece on the rednan of ‘google-news,’ because; sifuera here is deal one desaroyo new. as can corda, comienzo of year, ministerio publico owing to as one conferencia of prensa amplio for splica where is stop in the investigacion contra the unique sospechoso in the caso, esta joran van der sloot. at the ocasion here, fiscal parent hans mos owing to tell cu till still is investigando some detaye, but owing to admiti also cu is arrive instant cu have to saca one conclusion if have sufficient motibo for continua cu the investigacion if or not. till the instant ey, ministerio publico y police was pendiente some result investigativo still, y not have one date for tell what day will close the investigacion contra van der sloot, mirando cu go back haci peticion at publico for trece cualkier informacion fast cu can is relevante for her caso come across

i can guess what it says here.

the Aruban OM is not closing the case yet.
this in answer to questions raised about a newspaper article that popped up at google news, but this article is more than a year old.  ::MonkeyHaHa::
someone at Bondia is very stupid for filling their newspaper with such stories.
and because they are getting the dates wrong, quoting january 18th 2008 instead of december 18th 2007.

http://news.google.nl/news?hl=nl&um=1&tab=wn&nolr=1&q=OM+stopt+zaak+verdwijning+Holloway&btnG=Nieuws+zoeken
http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/81852/__OM_stopt_zaak_verdwijning_Holloway__.html

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Thanks Caesu - that's what I thought it said as well and I went to check De Telegraaf yesterdays paper and saw nothing.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:06:15 PM
2NJSons_Mom ... please edit my last post.

... almost three years ... s/b ... almost four years ...

Thank you.

Janet

... May 30, 2008 ... s/b ... May 30, 2005 ...

I apologize.

Thanks

Janet


Done, no problem.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 28, 2009, 06:09:12 PM
Just to add to the police confusion:

Whatever Peter DeWitte is now (including in charge of Coast Guard, which includes phone inspection...), Bernadina was, when Natalee disappeared.  I don't think we should leave him out of anything.  He may have been in charge of Van der Straaten.

The kpa site is pro Gielen.  Posted the full article.  The ALE have never been on Natalee's side.

Colombo  If the CIA guy is named Williams, with a house on Aruba, I'll die.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 06:11:42 PM
Just to add to the police confusion:

Whatever Peter DeWitte is now (including in charge of Coast Guard, which includes phone inspection...), Bernadina was, when Natalee disappeared.  I don't think we should leave him out of anything.  He may have been in charge of Van der Straaten.

The kpa site is pro Gielen.  Posted the full article.  The ALE have never been on Natalee's side.

Colombo  If the CIA guy is named Williams, with a house on Aruba, I'll die.

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 28, 2009, 06:14:49 PM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
SS,

I ask you again to produce the posts whereby I and Janet have made any "accusations to maliciously cause defamation of your character or have made any false or libelous statements that caused you injury."

Actually, it was you who threatened to post personal information:

" I doubt if Kermit would like for me to start posting personal information about her."
 http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.820

If you continue to not do so, I and everyone else at this website will take that as your admission you
 were either telling a lie or very badly mistaken and it will be understood that you admit total guilt.

In plain English: prove me or Janet were the ORIGINAL poster of any private information.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 28, 2009, 06:14:50 PM
Just to add to the police confusion:

Whatever Peter DeWitte is now (including in charge of Coast Guard, which includes phone inspection...), Bernadina was, when Natalee disappeared.  I don't think we should leave him out of anything.  He may have been in charge of Van der Straaten.

The kpa site is pro Gielen.  Posted the full article.  The ALE have never been on Natalee's side.

Colombo  If the CIA guy is named Williams, with a house on Aruba, I'll die.

Bernadina is disappointed in what his job has made of him.  “When you get in that highest position, you realize that nobody appreciates you; not your colleagues, not your employer, not the government.”

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2006/06/21/amigoe-superintendent-of-police-in-aruba-ronnie-bernadina-gets-out/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:15:19 PM
The following post reeks Mark Purcell ... Dave and Robin's AHATA friend.  The post reeks  deception.  Dave Holloway is being upheld ... while Jug Twitty is being subtly undermine.  How would CAPS know that Dave Holloway was a good guy but ... not know anything about Natalee Holloway's stepfather?

GMAB!

Janet

++++++


CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:18:18 PM
Hi Kermit.

If strawberry/rhubarb pie does not suffice ... another one of your Grandma's shoofly shoo pie is in the oven.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 06:22:53 PM
Hi Kermit.

If strawberry/rhubarb pie does not suffice ... another one of your Grandma's shoofly shoo pie is in the oven.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

OK Janet.You got the food covered.I'm steppin out for a second to put on my Feces suit cause the sh_t might start flyin! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:24:00 PM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
SS,

I ask you again to produce the posts whereby I and Janet have made any "accusations to maliciously cause defamation of your character or have made any false or libelous statements that caused you injury."

Actually, it was you who threatened to post personal information:

" I doubt if Kermit would like for me to start posting personal information about her."
 http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.820

If you continue to not do so, I and everyone else at this website will take that as your admission you
 were either telling a lie or very badly mistaken and it will be understood that you admit total guilt.

In plain English: prove me or Janet were the ORIGINAL poster of any private information.


Kermit ... I wish SS would clarify.

Maybe SS's post was writting on behalf of another person but .. that name was inadvertedly omitted.

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 28, 2009, 06:24:05 PM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1

That about say's it in a nutshell klaas.Couldn't get much closer!

I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!

You outdid yourself this time.

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 28, 2009, 06:27:11 PM
Kermit and Janet

Your statements about me are untrue.  You have made accusations to maliciously cause defamation of my character.  This will serve as notice to cease and desist from making false and libelous statements that cause personal injury to me.

SS
SS,

I ask you again to produce the posts whereby I and Janet have made any "accusations to maliciously cause defamation of your character or have made any false or libelous statements that caused you injury."

Actually, it was you who threatened to post personal information:

" I doubt if Kermit would like for me to start posting personal information about her."
 http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4434.820

If you continue to not do so, I and everyone else at this website will take that as your admission you
 were either telling a lie or very badly mistaken and it will be understood that you admit total guilt.

In plain English: prove me or Janet were the ORIGINAL poster of any private information.


Kermit ... I wish SS would clarify.

Maybe SS's post was writting on behalf of another person but .. that name was inadvertedly omitted.

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

I have no idea if she copy pasted it from someone else, but it was directed at you and me.
So, until she responds with PROOF of her allegations, I ain't giving it any more time.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:28:47 PM
Hi Kermit.

If strawberry/rhubarb pie does not suffice ... another one of your Grandma's shoofly shoo pie is in the oven.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

OK Janet.You got the food covered.I'm steppin out for a second to put on my Feces suit cause the sh_t might start flyin! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Well ... I ain't throwing my pies.  They going into the freezer where they were be protected.   Hey ... Tamikosmom does not bake often ... Safeway bakery is where it is at.  My effort cannot be wasted on those who obviously do not appreciate.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:30:56 PM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1

 ::MonkeyWaa::

It is not working for me.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 06:31:41 PM
Hi Kermit.

If strawberry/rhubarb pie does not suffice ... another one of your Grandma's shoofly shoo pie is in the oven.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

OK Janet.You got the food covered.I'm steppin out for a second to put on my Feces suit cause the sh_t might start flyin! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Well ... I ain't throwing my pies.  They going into the freezer where they were be protected.   Hey ... Tamikosmom does not bake often ... Safeway bakery is where it is at.  My effort cannot be wasted on those who obviously do not appreciate.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Smart Monkey you are! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 06:32:32 PM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1

 ::MonkeyWaa::

It is not working for me.

Janet


I believe it will Janet.Just give it some time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 28, 2009, 06:34:14 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 28, 2009, 06:34:57 PM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1

 ::MonkeyWaa::

It is not working for me.

Janet

If it doesn't eventually work, try this link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MctkihapfQs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 06:39:27 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

No worries Blonde!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:40:30 PM
O/T I was working on something else when I came accross this   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MctkihapfQs&hl=en&fs=1

 ::MonkeyWaa::

It is not working for me.

Janet

If it doesn't eventually work, try this link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MctkihapfQs

Thanks Klaas and texasmom.

My laugh for the day.

  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 06:41:24 PM
 :thumright: :2waver:

Mere, thanks for helping Jen with the map & Bastibro for giving us the name of the street.  (& Klaas for the additional road maps!)  I had to relinquish the computer for a while. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:42:54 PM
2NJSons_Mom ... please edit my last post.

... almost three years ... s/b ... almost four years ...

Thank you.

Janet

... May 30, 2008 ... s/b ... May 30, 2005 ...

I apologize.

Thanks

Janet


Done, no problem.

Thanks very much.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 28, 2009, 06:43:22 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

How is your mother Blonde?  Hope all is well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:45:18 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Blonde ... I hope all is well.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 28, 2009, 06:50:06 PM
Me too, Blonde, in my Prayers!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 28, 2009, 06:55:16 PM
Good Afternoon Janet. ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Mr. Keepthefaith.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Is it time for another KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS reminder?

Janet



Logic Dictates. ::MonkeyLaugh::  Also the post with Luis and John contacting Tim.Very interesting!

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking.

Janet

++++++

... and then Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway while Tim Miller was at his home.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007

COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 07:10:19 PM
Janet,

Considering the date of the interview with Tim Miller was July 15, 2007 and he states that it was a couple months before that Louis Schaefer called Dave while Tim was at Schaefer's house - makes me think of the timing in Superior Offshore going public and the potential underlying motives aside from bring Natalee home to her family.  Very close in date.

****************************

IPO REPORT
Superior Offshore IPO rallies in debut
Subsea construction firm fatten IPO to $150 mln
By Steve Gelsi, MarketWatch
Last update: 2:01 p.m. EDT April 20, 2007NEW YORK (MarketWatch) --

 Superior Offshore fattened its deal by about 17% and raised more than $150 million as Wall Street clamored for the subsea construction firm's initial public offering Friday.

Superior Offshore (DEEP:DEEP
News , chart , profile , more
Last:


DEEP, , ) supplies deep sea diving services and ships equipped with helicopter pads and cranes for offshore drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Lafayette, La. company priced 10.17 million shares at $15 a share in a bid to raise $153 million. The stock opened at $18 and traded at $18.01 in the open market for a gain of 20% over its IPO price.

In a sign of strength ahead of trading, Superior Offshore increased the size of the deal by 1.5 million shares.

The IPO comes about five months after Cal Dive International Inc. (DVR:cal dive intl inc del com

Superior Offshore priced its IPO in the middle of its $14-$16 range. Merrill Lynch and J.P. Morgan are underwriters of the deal.
As solar, ethanol and other alternative energy deals have made their mark in the IPO market in recent months, they've been joined by a steady stream of deals from companies tied to the fossil fuel businesses. 
Steve Gelsi is a reporter for MarketWatch in New York.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/ipo-report-superior-offshore-ipo/story.aspx?guid={1B650844-C62C-4073-80FD-82A6AE4F3558}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 28, 2009, 07:22:19 PM
Somebody may have posted this.Thought it was interesting to say the least!

Steering Committee of the Strategic Communications Task Force:
Myrna Jansen, chairperson Aruba Tourism Authority
Serge Mansur, chairperson Aruba Trade & Industry Association
Jorge Pesquera, chairperson Aruba Hotel and Tourism Association
Edwin Roos Chamber of Commerce
Jaap Beaujon Advisor
Agustin Vrolijk Department of Foreign Affairs
Frits Israel Aruba Tourism Authority
Gina Lopez-Gnecco Aruba Tourism Authority
Rob Smith Aruba Hospitality & Security Foundation


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 07:23:05 PM
What is the amount one, especially one who is wealthy, can write off as contribution, or other? 

We pay an accountant to do our taxes and we don't have squat.  Just still thinking about how Schaefer could potentially have saved himself after the company tanked within the next two quarters following going public, the neglect of filing with the SEC while pushing through the search in Aruban waters. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 07:33:14 PM
What is the amount one, especially one who is wealthy, can write off as contribution, or other? 

We pay an accountant to do our taxes and we don't have squat.  Just still thinking about how Schaefer could potentially have saved himself after the company tanked within the next two quarters following going public, the neglect of filing with the SEC while pushing through the search in Aruban waters. 

How much can you write-off in charitable contributions?
Americans are generous individuals. From corporations to private citizens, Americans gave an estimated $241 billion to charitable organizations in 2003, according to the study “Giving USA 2004.” So when tax time rolls around, it’s always nice to see your charitable contributions pay off as a charitable deduction. The question is: while contributing may be good for the soul, how good is it really on your tax return?

How Much Is Too Much?

The IRS has a limit on giving, but even if your heart exceeds the IRS maximum, you may still be able to benefit from your generous spirit. You may deduct a maximum of up to 50% of your adjusted gross income (AGI) (Line 36 on IRS Form 1040) for the tax year the donation was given. However, if you give more than 50%, the excess may be carried forward for up to five years. Be aware that the 50% rule applies to most contributions, but certain contributions may have lower limits.

What Is Tax-Deductible? How is it Deducted?

Now that you’ve figured out how much you can deduct, the next question is what exactly is tax deductible and how is it deducted? If you donate money or property to a “qualified organization,” your donation can be deducted by filing Form 1040 and itemizing the deduction on Schedule A. If you do not itemize your deduction using Schedule A, you cannot deduct your charitable contribution.


It is extremely important to get receipts and keep records for your donations.


“Qualified organizations” include nonprofit groups that are religious, charitable, educational, scientific or literary in purpose, and nonprofit groups that work to prevent cruelty to children or animals. The following types of organizations qualify for a deduction:

• Churches, synagogues, temples, mosques and other religious organizations.

• Federal, state and local governments, if your contribution is used for public purposes.

• Nonprofit schools and hospitals.

• Public parks and recreation facilities.

• Salvation Army, Red Cross, CARE, Goodwill, United Way, Boy and Girl Scouts, etc.

• War veterans’ groups.

• Expenses paid for a student living with you, sponsored by a qualified organization.

On the other hand, the types of organizations below do not qualify for a charitable deduction:

• Civic leagues, social and sports clubs, labor unions and chambers of commerce.

• Foreign organizations (except certain Canadian, Israeli and Mexican charities).

• For-profit organizations.

• Lobbying or lawmaking organizations.

• Lottery, bingo or raffle tickets.

• Dues, fees or bills paid to social or recreational clubs.

• Homeowners’ associations.

• Individuals.

• Political groups or candidates for public office.

http://www.legalzoom.com/legal-articles/article13196.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 07:43:34 PM
Thanks, Klaas.  I wasn't sure if it was a percentage based on gross income....guess I could have looked it up, myself.   ::MonkeyRoll::    ::MonkeyHaHa::

Shoulda, coulda, woulda   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 28, 2009, 07:48:41 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

How is your mother Blonde?  Hope all is well.
She is not doing well ,they have her on life suport right now and keeping her on a lot of drugs so that she can sleep.
Evertime I went into her room she woke up. Because she knows my touch.
 So they told me to let her sleep.
Then maybe they can take her off the life suport and she can breath on her own.
I don't want her to worry about me and  she was.
So we just don't know.
My heart is braking.
I'm calling ICU once an hour.
Thanks for asking


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 28, 2009, 07:54:09 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

How is your mother Blonde?  Hope all is well.
She is not doing well ,they have her on life suport right now and keeping her on a lot of drugs so that she can sleep.
Evertime I went into her room she woke up. Because she knows my touch.
 So they told me to let her sleep.
Then maybe they can take her off the life suport and she can breath on her own.
I don't want her to worry about me and  she was.
So we just don't know.
My heart is braking.
I'm calling ICU once an hour.
Thanks for asking

God Bless You Blonde! My Thoughts and Prayers are with You and Your Family


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on January 28, 2009, 08:07:11 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

How is your mother Blonde?  Hope all is well.
She is not doing well ,they have her on life suport right now and keeping her on a lot of drugs so that she can sleep.
Evertime I went into her room she woke up. Because she knows my touch.
 So they told me to let her sleep.
Then maybe they can take her off the life suport and she can breath on her own.
I don't want her to worry about me and  she was.
So we just don't know.
My heart is braking.
I'm calling ICU once an hour.
Thanks for asking


Blonde I am so sorry I didn't know your Mom was ill and in the hospital...I will pray for her and ask my prayer group to do the same. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 10:28:28 PM
OT

It's been quiet.  Hope all are safe & warm.  I know the weather has been a problem.  We are having our share here with snow, then rain and it's supposed to freeze tonight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 28, 2009, 10:53:12 PM
OT

It's been quiet.  Hope all are safe & warm.  I know the weather has been a problem.  We are having our share here with snow, then rain and it's supposed to freeze tonight.

It's on your way, just left us.  We are still under a state of emergency.  Ice, Sleet, Snow, Rain (5") and tonight it is suppose to get down to 15 degrees so everything will freeze up totally.  Trees, power lines down, no electricity, people are hold up in churches, schools to keep warm. Saying at least 1 week before they can get power back up.  It's bad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 28, 2009, 10:57:42 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52047.php

Aruba
Closure threatens as Valero unmerchantable shows
28 Jan, 2009, 13:43 (GMT -04:00)
 
Part of the ad Valero this week in local newspapers to publish the refinery to give a better image.
ORANGE CITY - Valero refineries where off will and will not be sold, will most likely permanently closed. This is a top boss of the U.S. oil company, Bill Klees, yesterday against a foreign analyst said, after the company closed 2008 with red figures. The refinery in San Nicolas is one of the refiners like Valero that sold it.

PR director Bill Day leaves from San Antonio that Klees responded to a hypothetical question. " Aruba does he do not go to that because of the declining world economy in the short term the refinery to close its doors. Day confirms that a new buyer for Valero Aruba, but this would not go into details. Whether there is a serious offer on the table last year after the takeover by Brazilian Petrobras failed, remains unknown.
If the refinery does not sell the business and not keep going, gives Day after some vetches and roads that closure is an option. " "But we do not have a critical deadline. We have always said that we do not have to sell. It is one of the possibilities. "

The ads that the oil company this week published in local newspapers, sketches a different picture. Valero says to the Aruban people the facts right "to want to give after a perception arose that the company pays no tax and only pollutes the environment. In the last sentence seems rather a warning message: "The refinery is a good neighbor and valuable to Aruba. But now give other countries more attractive incentives than Aruba does - and it is still attractive to process crude oil to the Gulf coast of the United States. "

Day says this about the ad should not be interpreted as a warning, but for the people to point out that Valero is currently elsewhere can better compete. "Five years ago, when we refinery acquisitions, the circumstances and the economy better. Now things have changed and it is that we are no longer the first time as valuation and other issues such as licensing. "

The failure of the talks last year between Valero and the government on payment of sales tax, among other BBO, the oil is a clear signal that Aruba is much less interest in the refinery
According to opposition party ASF would become a settlement proposal, as it by e-mail from Valero been confirmed on the table. PR Director Day said that the ensuing oil choose to wait for the outcome of the arbitration case in February.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: cajun miracle on January 28, 2009, 11:01:46 PM
Just wanted to say HI to all of the Monkeys. Been reading each day and wishing for news.
KTF You had me fooled. LOL! Blonde, my prayers for you and your MOM.

Bring Natalee home!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cajun Miracle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 28, 2009, 11:14:50 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52047.php

Aruba
Closure threatens as Valero unmerchantable shows
28 Jan, 2009, 13:43 (GMT -04:00)
 
Part of the ad Valero this week in local newspapers to publish the refinery to give a better image.
ORANGE CITY - Valero refineries where off will and will not be sold, will most likely permanently closed. This is a top boss of the U.S. oil company, Bill Klees, yesterday against a foreign analyst said, after the company closed 2008 with red figures. The refinery in San Nicolas is one of the refiners like Valero that sold it.

PR director Bill Day leaves from San Antonio that Klees responded to a hypothetical question. " Aruba does he do not go to that because of the declining world economy in the short term the refinery to close its doors. Day confirms that a new buyer for Valero Aruba, but this would not go into details. Whether there is a serious offer on the table last year after the takeover by Brazilian Petrobras failed, remains unknown.
If the refinery does not sell the business and not keep going, gives Day after some vetches and roads that closure is an option. " "But we do not have a critical deadline. We have always said that we do not have to sell. It is one of the possibilities. "

The ads that the oil company this week published in local newspapers, sketches a different picture. Valero says to the Aruban people the facts right "to want to give after a perception arose that the company pays no tax and only pollutes the environment. In the last sentence seems rather a warning message: "The refinery is a good neighbor and valuable to Aruba. But now give other countries more attractive incentives than Aruba does - and it is still attractive to process crude oil to the Gulf coast of the United States. "

Day says this about the ad should not be interpreted as a warning, but for the people to point out that Valero is currently elsewhere can better compete. "Five years ago, when we refinery acquisitions, the circumstances and the economy better. Now things have changed and it is that we are no longer the first time as valuation and other issues such as licensing. "

The failure of the talks last year between Valero and the government on payment of sales tax, among other BBO, the oil is a clear signal that Aruba is much less interest in the refinery
According to opposition party ASF would become a settlement proposal, as it by e-mail from Valero been confirmed on the table. PR Director Day said that the ensuing oil choose to wait for the outcome of the arbitration case in February.
When gas sells for $4/gallon -- it makes sense to keep an old and under-producing refinery open. It doesn't make sense at $1.50/gallon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 28, 2009, 11:32:00 PM
Blonde - that is not Satish.  If I remember correctly that photo at Carlos n Charlies was taken before Natalee was even in Aruba. 
I know I was going to delete that post but the hosp. called and  I forgot.sorry

How is your mother Blonde?  Hope all is well.
She is not doing well ,they have her on life suport right now and keeping her on a lot of drugs so that she can sleep.
Evertime I went into her room she woke up. Because she knows my touch.
 So they told me to let her sleep.
Then maybe they can take her off the life suport and she can breath on her own.
I don't want her to worry about me and  she was.
So we just don't know.
My heart is braking.
I'm calling ICU once an hour.
Thanks for asking


Blonde,
I am so sorry to read about your Mom, my heart goes out to you. You and your family are in our prayers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 12:25:09 AM
Considering Beth Holloway and the FBI have received from the Natalee's Freebirds all of the info that Kyle Kingman shared in his own words regarding John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruba coverup ... I would assume that any investigation by the FBI that is going on behind the sences would dictate that both Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan are questioned.

Tim Tehran is the key to exposing with certainty this entire conspiracy.  I do not think for one moment that Tim would be in negotiations with major networks if he could not back up the ROV images with a first hand account of what he observed in that December 30, 2008 dive.

This is why Louis Shaeffer (ROV copyright), Kyle Kingsman (ROV analyst) and Tim Tahran (diver) are thisclose in regards to the network negotiations.

Obviously, Tim Trahan did not anticipate the leak of the ROV images on the internet by Kyle Kingman when he stated following the December 30, 2008 dive that there was "nothing" in the trap/cage.

Then when you stop and consider Tim Trahan, Kyle Kingman and Louis Shaefer's attempts at major network deals ... logic dictates there was "something" in that cage/trap.

Janet
_______


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


On Dec. 30, off the coast of Aruba, divers from the Aruban police force and the research vessel Persistence were about to make a crucial dive on a promising target in the search for Natalee Holloway.

The researchers had discovered a fish trap about 90 feet below the surface in almost the exact spot search expert Tim Miller had theorized Natalee’s body might be.

Team leader Tim Trahan suited up to join the Aruban police divers. As Tim Miller wished him well, the divers hit the water and the ROV was sent down to capture what would happen for everyone watching on board.

(On the boat)

Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap.

They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.

The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap.

The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat)

No it's thumbs down.

Negative, not it.

Crushing disppointment.

(On the boat)

Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?

Trahan: No.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 12:28:22 AM
Has there been any udates on the condition of Blonde's Mother?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 12:29:05 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
9:30 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: vms on January 29, 2009, 12:31:07 AM
Blonde,

You and your mother are in my prayers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 12:33:41 AM
Considering Beth Holloway and the FBI have received from the Natalee's Freebirds all of the info that Kyle Kingman shared in his own words regarding John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruba coverup ... I would assume that any investigation by the FBI that is going on behind the sences would dictate that both Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan are questioned.

Tim Tehran is the key to exposing with certainty this entire conspiracy.  I do not think for one moment that Tim would be in negotiations with major networks if he could not back up the ROV images with a first hand account of what he observed in that December 30, 2008 dive.

This is why Louis Shaeffer (ROV copyright), Kyle Kingsman (ROV analyst) and Tim Tahran (diver) are thisclose in regards to the network negotiations.

Obviously, Tim Trahan did not anticipate the leak of the ROV images on the internet by Kyle Kingman when he stated following the December 30, 2008 dive that there was "nothing" in the trap/cage.

Then when you stop and consider Tim Trahan, Kyle Kingman and Louis Shaefer's attempts at major network deals ... logic dictates there was "something" in that cage/trap.

Janet
_______


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


On Dec. 30, off the coast of Aruba, divers from the Aruban police force and the research vessel Persistence were about to make a crucial dive on a promising target in the search for Natalee Holloway.

The researchers had discovered a fish trap about 90 feet below the surface in almost the exact spot search expert Tim Miller had theorized Natalee’s body might be.

Team leader Tim Trahan suited up to join the Aruban police divers. As Tim Miller wished him well, the divers hit the water and the ROV was sent down to capture what would happen for everyone watching on board.

(On the boat)

Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap.

They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.

The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap.

The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat)

No it's thumbs down.

Negative, not it.

Crushing disppointment.

(On the boat)

Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?

Trahan: No.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/



Thank you Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 12:36:11 AM
Has there been any udates on the condition of Blonde's Mother?

Janet


No update that I can find Janet.  Blonde posted about her mom earlier today in the prayer thread; maybe she will post an update there if not here.  Hope we hear from her soon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 12:36:50 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
9:30 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 29, 2009, 12:52:10 AM
Blonde,

You and your mother are in my prayers.

Blonde,

So sorry to hear you mom is ill.  I, too, will keep you and your family in my prayers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 12:54:39 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/ScreenShot003a.jpg)

TRUTH and JUSTICE for NATALEE!!!!!

Thank you texasmom.

Good Night.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 29, 2009, 12:54:50 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 01:06:00 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 01:51:12 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::
Just a drive by, but I knew ktf was a he BEFORE he know he was a he.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 29, 2009, 01:52:11 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE








(http://)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 01:54:04 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::
Just a drive by, but I knew ktf was a he BEFORE he knew he was a he.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Correction in red...he..he...he...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 02:04:10 AM
Goodnight Icehawk, ospainter, klaasend and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
I have faith that tomorrow we will be one day closer to Justice for Natalee.....
My prayers to BLONDE, her Mom, and family......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:04:52 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::
Just a drive by, but I knew ktf was a he BEFORE he knew he was a he.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Correction in red...he..he...he...


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Hi billb!  Good to see you, even if it is just a drive by....from YOU of all people.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Your comment raises a question....IMWTK...but it is of a personal nature so I won't ask.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 02:09:32 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::
Just a drive by, but I knew ktf was a he BEFORE he knew he was a he.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Correction in red...he..he...he...


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Hi billb!  Good to see you, even if it is just a drive by....from YOU of all people.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Your comment raises a question....IMWTK...but it is of a personal nature so I won't ask.  ::MonkeyWink::
TM...you got me...hook, line and sinker..what is: IMWTK?  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 29, 2009, 02:12:51 AM
Goodnight Icehawk, ospainter, klaasend and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
I have faith that tomorrow we will be one day closer to Justice for Natalee.....
My prayers to BLONDE, her Mom, and family......




Goodnight billb


My prayers also to BLONDE, her MOM. and FAMILY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:16:12 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::
Just a drive by, but I knew ktf was a he BEFORE he knew he was a he.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Correction in red...he..he...he...


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Hi billb!  Good to see you, even if it is just a drive by....from YOU of all people.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Your comment raises a question....IMWTK...but it is of a personal nature so I won't ask.  ::MonkeyWink::
TM...you got me...hook, line and sinker..what is: IMWTK?  ::MonkeyEek::

Inquiring Minds Want To Know!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
Wellllll you did say that YOU KNEW ktf was a he BEFORE he did?  Only one way this logical mind can take that...

But then again, maybe you didn't mean for me to take it logically!   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:19:28 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

(http://)

Great pics Icehawk!  Thanks for posting them!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 29, 2009, 02:23:38 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

(http://)

Great pics Icehawk!  Thanks for posting them!   ::MonkeyCool::




You are very welcome. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 02:25:17 AM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::
Just a drive by, but I knew ktf was a he BEFORE he knew he was a he.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Correction in red...he..he...he...


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Hi billb!  Good to see you, even if it is just a drive by....from YOU of all people.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Your comment raises a question....IMWTK...but it is of a personal nature so I won't ask.  ::MonkeyWink::
TM...you got me...hook, line and sinker..what is: IMWTK?  ::MonkeyEek::

Inquiring Minds Want To Know!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
Wellllll you did say that YOU KNEW ktf was a he BEFORE he did?  Only one way this logical mind can take that...

But then again, maybe you didn't mean for me to take it logically!   
Logically....logically....logically......did you say logically? Don't get me started, Pleeeeease!
Before I answer, I'd like to phone a friend....Janet...
you threw me off with M (Minds)
And I did know him...we went to different schools together... ::MonkeyConfused::
I'm so confused...where is mt keeper?  ::MonkeyCool::
Just keeping it lite here in the cage.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:30:31 AM
 

::MonkeyHaHa:: billb....now I'm confused!  mt keeper?  I don't do confusion any better than I do patience.

 ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 02:31:41 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

(http://)

Great pics Icehawk!  Thanks for posting them!   ::MonkeyCool::
Icehawk...I second TMs Thanks....
We are here for Justice for Natalee.....my heart breaks today and every day...nearly four years later... for Beth, Dave, Jug, Robin...and their extended families.
ARUBA..we won't be going away any time soon.....I join Beth in being a voice for Natalee for 40 years if necessary....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:34:04 AM
My Prayers to Blonde,her mom,as well as the family!What a peaceful day in the cage ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:35:45 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

(http://)

Great pics Icehawk!  Thanks for posting them!   ::MonkeyCool::
Icehawk...I second TMs Thanks....
We are here for Justice for Natalee.....my heart breaks today and every day...nearly four years later... for Beth, Dave, Jug, Robin...and their extended families.
ARUBA..we won't be going away any time soon.....I join Beth in being a voice for Natalee for 40 years if necessary....

Me too!!!!  Justice for Natalee!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 02:35:51 AM


::MonkeyHaHa:: billb....now I'm confused!  mt keeper?  I don't do confusion any better than I do patience.

 ::MonkeyCool::


TM..OK, how 'bout me thinks (mt) keeper......I'll settle for (my) keeper though...only if it helps....
And Oh, by the way....you are killing my "drive by" quote:!!Goodnight TM, and all you beautiful Monkeys...
ktf...you too, big guy.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:37:14 AM


::MonkeyHaHa:: billb....now I'm confused!  mt keeper?  I don't do confusion any better than I do patience.

 ::MonkeyCool::


TM..OK, how 'bout me thinks (mt) keeper......I'll settle for (my) keeper though...only if it helps....
And Oh, by the way....you are killing my "drive by" quote:!!Goodnight TM, and all you beautiful Monkeys...
ktf...you too, big guy.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Goodnight BillB! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:38:37 AM
TM.On the front page of Bon Dia,down a couple of articles is something about Joran and the case.Is this the one that was reposted from a year ago or is it new?TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:39:21 AM


::MonkeyHaHa:: billb....now I'm confused!  mt keeper?  I don't do confusion any better than I do patience.

 ::MonkeyCool::


TM..OK, how 'bout me thinks (mt) keeper......I'll settle for (my) keeper though...only if it helps....
And Oh, by the way....you are killing my "drive by" quote:!!Goodnight TM, and all you beautiful Monkeys...
ktf...you too, big guy.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:40:47 AM
TM.On the front page of Bon Dia,down a couple of articles is something about Joran and the case.Is this the one that was reposted from a year ago or is it new?TIA

Yes, that's the one where they said an old article had been printed about the case being closed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:43:16 AM
TM.On the front page of Bon Dia,down a couple of articles is something about Joran and the case.Is this the one that was reposted from a year ago or is it new?TIA

Yes, that's the one where they said an old article had been printed about the case being closed.

Thanx.Oh well! ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 02:43:25 AM
Good Night TM, KTF and billb!

Justice for Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:49:18 AM
Good Night TM, KTF and billb!

Justice for Natalee!


Goodnight Hotping.I'm gettin ready to rest my head as well! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:56:18 AM
I agree with Buckeye's comment earlier about not leaving Bernadina out of the mix.

I was doing some reading here earlier, thought others might be interested too.

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_04_02_archive.html


(Bernadina's current position assigned by the Minister of Justice)
 
http://www.diarioaruba.com/diasabra/noticia/news4.html

Papiamentu translation:

consehero mr. ronny bernadina cu splicacion amplio: have to place ley of test of drugs in urina in the prioridadnan of staten! oranjestad (aan) – yesterday morning, mr. ronny bernadina (consehero of minister of husticia) owing to as one conferencia of prensa in cual past owing to referi at the test of drugs for ambtenaar y all another trahador publico, cual is worde saca for of urina. the funcionario owing to menciona cu have one mandato of minister of husticia of date 31 of july 2008 where cu past owing to place one comision bao of presidencia of mr. bernadina self, for give the mandatario conseho y recomendacionnan cu is encera maneho, gastonan overall y another condicionnan mara at ehecucion of the decreto gubernamental “landsbesluit controle op psychoactieve stoffen”. the comision is consisti of representantenan of laboratory, d.p.o, p&o, svb y departamento huridico. the comision owing to give his conseho preliminar at the mandatario, at november 2008 end, already cu they owing to achieve three month for work on the conseho. the comision owing to as various meeting cu several instancia y organizacion for achieve one best view if the ley here can owing to achieve sosten close they or if have to owing to haci some cambio necesario at the ley actual. bernadina owing to agrega cu they owing to achieve one sosten enough amplio y they owing to as at cuenta cu the consehonan cu was tey end on the ley here, as esun of raad van advies y raad van minister, dwjz cual conseho they owing to tume in consideracion, some sindicato, office of recurso human of one hotel y of c.z.m. carib cu is office of recurso human of the mariniernan cu is staciona at antiyas y aruba. besides, they owing to as feed back of the own mandatario, of pg y they owing to busca informacion for of some of the casonan legal cu did take lugar. past owing to agrega cu the comision owing to busca another informacionnan for of organizacionnan cu have the ley end. “mi have of tell cu for we cuminza not was have nothing. for we owing to busca informacion con for work criterionan obhetivo, because criterionan subhetivo is facil, we owing to busca the ley of philadelphia. for of police y brandweer of philadelphia we owing to achieve all one pakete; also the leynan of miami cu we owing to achieve one pakete completo, but first cu owing to work the leynan here consenso owing to worde close first cu the sindicatonan. kiermen, owing to come maneho, combersacion y they owing to arrive at one consenso for they can owing to haci esaki”, mr. bernadina owing to subraya. past owing to agrega cu this kiermen cu cada acolyte of cuerpo policial y of brandweer at merca, know very good the instant cu they can take one test of urina for of they. “nan is bay of the ley ey cu hour have one accidente pisa ocasiona for one person of police or of brandweer, the is worde getest also on drugs in urina”, mr. bernadina owing to splica. door of one encuentro cu the agent of system carib at curacao the comision owing to worde informa cu the ley here is at the netherlands, but not owing to worde introduci still, although cu the is at vigor. “e motibo principal is cu past owing to stick on the tumamento of urina, con for hacie, that is hacie, etc., then algo relaciona cu the integridad of the person hour have to saca urina for of dje. we owing to read the various decisionnan of huez on casonan cu much of they're civil or of job. dus, the casonan cu we is bay work on they're more bien of ambtenaar y still not have none in esaki”, mr. bernadina owing to señala. recomendacionnan tocante the ley: bernadina owing to follow splica cu in the consehonan ricibi owing to resalta several sharp cualnan past owing to menciona. - the ley here have to count ; for all ambtenaar equal but also for all esnan cu is work in fundacion subsidia for gobierno, etc., thing is nifica one overall of seven thousand employee publico. - have to as cuenta cu the privacidad of the employee here cu have the derecho fundamental also hour of take the urina. - on the tumamento of urina have to come reglanan valido. come cu one person neutral, esta one person of confianza cu worde proteha for ley (vertrouwenspersoon). actualmente, in the ley cu have t’asina cu the boss of servicio is esun cu is señala the employee cu the is esun cu have to bay happen the test of urina. the comision wanted evita esey because can sosode cu the boss of servicio self or esnan hacido of redo can probecha of esey if they not like one colega y tell cu the is employ drugs y cu the is bad in his funcion. - leave for of the sharp of view cu adiccion is one ailment y so have to worde deal - give the person cu owing to worde achieve positive chens for rehabilita. not have to forget cu the is one problem social y have to can hinca his family rond of dje in the trayecto here. - regula the tumamento of urina for her is more obhetivo posible - haci cambio in the leynan adhunto cu have relacion cu lma (ley vigente lands materieel ambtenarenrecht) y in the ley actual, cu they owing to sake for of articulo 49, und can place derecho y obligacionnan y the motibonan for cual the person have to happen the test of drugs in urina. according mr. bernadina so here can have best leg for stop on dje hour of aplica the ley here. - place the ley here on list of prioridad for worde deal at staten. the ley here not owing to happen staten y because; cu the is atacha privacidad cu is one derecho fundamental of the personanan, where cu urina is worde saca, the have to bay via of staten. this is one of the rekisitonan ancra in tratado of roma, tratado of new york y in we constitucion also is worde tell. more on the conferencia of prensa here will can read in we next edicion. come across



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:57:06 AM
Good Night TM, KTF and billb!

Justice for Natalee!


Goodnight Hotping!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 29, 2009, 02:57:31 AM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

(http://)

Great pics Icehawk!  Thanks for posting them!   ::MonkeyCool::
Icehawk...I second TMs Thanks....
We are here for Justice for Natalee.....my heart breaks today and every day...nearly four years later... for Beth, Dave, Jug, Robin...and their extended families.
ARUBA..we won't be going away any time soon.....I join Beth in being a voice for Natalee for 40 years if necessary....



Billb Thank You  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:09:44 AM
Have to finish reading that information in the morning.A lot of contradictory statements. ::MonkeyConfused::


Goodnight TM,IceHawk,simp1980, Mere and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 03:17:21 AM
Have to finish reading that information in the morning.A lot of contradictory statements. ::MonkeyConfused::


Goodnight TM,IceHawk,simp1980, Mere and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.


Goodnight KTF!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 03:22:43 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 03:24:49 AM


Goodnight ospainter & guests!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 08:04:23 AM
Blonde,  I hope your Mama is improving and you are
hanging in there.  I know it is hard. (((((hugs))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 08:44:41 AM
Update from Blonde here.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=147.new#new

Have a great day monkeys! 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 09:44:27 AM
TM.On the front page of Bon Dia,down a couple of articles is something about Joran and the case.Is this the one that was reposted from a year ago or is it new?TIA

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3610&Itemid=1

Caso contra Jvd Sloot ta sigui habri serca Ministerio Publico  
Wednesday, 28 January 2009 
ORANJESTAD—Ministerio Publico NO a sera e investigacion contra Joran van der Sloot den e caso di desaparicion di Natalee Holloway, contrario na locual De Telegraaf a raporta ayera.

E corant Hulandes ayera a publica cu Ministerio Publico di Aruba a sera e caso contra e tres sospechosonan, y cu un vocero a bisa cu motibo ta falta di prueba.  Sinembargo, locual e corant a raporta ayera atrobe tabata un noticia bieu di 18 di Januari 2007. E pregunta ta con e por ta asina cu un noticia bieu ta bolbe haya e atencion y ta aparece riba e rednan di ‘Google-news,’ como sifuera aki ta trata un desaroyo nobo.



Manera por corda, comienzo di aña, Ministerio Publico a tene un conferencia di prensa amplio pa splica unda ta para den e investigacion contra e unico sospechoso den e caso, esta Joran van der Sloot. Na e ocasion aki, Fiscal Mayor Hans Mos a bisa cu te ainda ta investigando algun detaye, pero a admiti tambe cu ta yega momento cu mester saca un conclusion si tin suficiente motibo pa continua cu e investigacion si of no. Te e momento ey, Ministerio Publico y Polis tabata pendiente algun resultado investigativo ainda, y no tin un fecha pa bisa ki dia lo sera e investigacion contra van der Sloot, mirando cu bolbe haci peticion na publico pa trece cualkier informacion dilanti cu por ta relevante pa e caso.


Through translator:

caso contra jvd sloot is follow open serca ministerio publico

 wednesday, 28 january 2009 oranjestad—

ministerio publico not owing to close the investigacion contra joran van der sloot in the caso of desaparicion of natalee holloway, contrario at locual de telegraaf owing to raporta yesterday. the corant dutch yesterday owing to publica cu ministerio publico of aruba owing to close the caso contra the three sospechosonan, y cu one vocero owing to tell cu motibo is miss of proof. sinembargo, locual the corant owing to raporta yesterday again was one news old of 18 of january 2007. the question is con the can is so cu one news old is go back achieve the atencion y is aparece on the rednan of ‘google-news,’ because; sifuera here is deal one desaroyo new. as can corda, comienzo of year, ministerio publico owing to as one conferencia of prensa amplio for splica where is stop in the investigacion contra the unique sospechoso in the caso, esta joran van der sloot. at the ocasion here, fiscal parent hans mos owing to tell cu till still is investigando some detaye, but owing to admiti also cu is arrive instant cu have to saca one conclusion if have sufficient motibo for continua cu the investigacion if or not. till the instant ey, ministerio publico y police was pendiente some result investigativo still, y not have one date for tell what day will close the investigacion contra van der sloot, mirando cu go back haci peticion at publico for trece cualkier informacion fast cu can is relevante for her caso. come across
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 09:57:49 AM
O/T sortof   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.nypost.com/seven/01292009/news/regionalnews/manhattan/city_to_get_dutch_treat_152558.htm

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dutch1.jpg)

And the comment   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dutch2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 29, 2009, 10:33:05 AM
there is a good post on msn.com that should be brought over.
i do not know how to do it. something about frog legs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 10:42:53 AM
there is a good post on msn.com that should be brought over.
i do not know how to do it. something about frog legs.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Another O/T

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28876555/wid/18298287/?GT1=45002

Human appetites endanger frogs, study finds
Up to 1 billion eaten each year, adding to other stresses like disease
By Jessica Marshall
Discovery Channel
updated 10:19 a.m. PT, Tues., Jan. 27, 2009
(http://tk2.stb.s-msn.com/i/62/15E7C918E27CD085A4EB7B3DF6AF54.jpg)
The world's frogs face yet another threat to their survival: overeating by humans.

A global team of researchers has estimated that the international trade in frog meat represents 200 million to 1 billion frogs eaten each year, or about 11,000 tons of frog meat.

The team analyzed commodity-trading data from the United Nations to obtain the best possible estimates of the international frog leg trade.

"We don't have the global culture of eating frogs in our minds," said study author Corey Bradshaw of the University of Adelaide in Australia. "We wouldn't consider them a staple, but for a lot of people in Asia and South America, it is a staple."

The largest destination for frog legs is, predictably, France. "Most people would probably be surprised that the U.S. is a very close second," Bradshaw said.

Huge appetite in Indonesia
Indonesia is the largest exporter by far. But international trade is only part of the picture. The researchers estimate that the domestic consumption of frogs in Indonesia dwarfs the nation's exports by at least two- to seven-fold.

The U.N. estimates are rough, the researchers point out, and much remains unknown. For instance, it is almost impossible to identify which species are being traded. Endangered populations — inadvertently or not — may be part of the trade.

"They have a general idea of what species are taken, but the details are practically nonexistent," Bradshaw said.

"We don't know what species are getting hit, and the trade might be increasing on these species," agreed co-author David Bickford of the National University of Singapore.

The potential for frog population collapse from over harvesting is similar to what has happened with the world's marine fisheries, Bradshaw said. "We should have learned our lesson from fish, and exactly the same thing is happening with frogs."

The threat from human consumption sits against the background of global amphibian decline. At least 30 percent of all amphibian species are threatened with extinction.

Habitat, disease, warming also factors
In an earlier study, the researchers analyzed data showing that habitat loss is by far the greatest contributor to decline. Disease and global warming are additional threats. But the contribution from hunting has been underestimated, the researchers suggest.

"The first and foremost [contribution] is habitat loss, and harvest comes in a close second," Bradshaw said.

Trade alone may not be enough of a problem to drive frog species to extinction, but when added to other threats the frogs face, the combination may be enough tip some species over the edge.

"It's rarely a single thing that drives things to extinction," Bradshaw noted. "We're losing species faster than you can say 'boo' in the amphibian world."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 10:55:47 AM
Kermit says:

LET MY PEOPLE GO!!!!!!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 29, 2009, 11:14:10 AM
Klaas -

Thanks.
Thought it would be funny for kermit to see later (hopefully) !!!

BUCKSHOT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 11:15:44 AM
O/T sortof   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.nypost.com/seven/01292009/news/regionalnews/manhattan/city_to_get_dutch_treat_152558.htm

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dutch1.jpg)

And the comment   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dutch2.jpg)

 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 11:23:06 AM
Klaas -

Thanks.
Thought it would be funny for kermit to see later (hopefully) !!!

BUCKSHOT

It's a good article.  Nut44X4 posted it in Musings, yesterday, too. 

 http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4248.740


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 11:24:36 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!!

Janet
8:25 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 11:32:45 AM
Good Morning Janet!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 12:06:16 PM
Kermit says:

LET MY PEOPLE GO!!!!!!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 12:36:40 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.We are here again today to seek JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 12:42:08 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 12:44:37 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.We are here again today to seek JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.......
Good Morning KTF...Sure wish someone would give Us some encouraging news.  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 12:44:38 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: That is funny!Just browsing around the internet looking for any crumbs.Maybe Bastibro will enlighten us one day on the sexual deviation theory of Paulus & Co. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 12:46:06 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.We are here again today to seek JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.......
Good Morning KTF...Sure wish someone would give Us some encouraging news.  ::MonkeyEek::

I pray that it will come when we least expect it!Still working on finding anyhting out about anyone in this case involved with OIL.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 12:52:48 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.We are here again today to seek JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.......
Good Morning KTF...Sure wish someone would give Us some encouraging news.  ::MonkeyEek::

I pray that it will come when we least expect it!Still working on finding anyhting out about anyone in this case involved with OIL.. ::MonkeyCool::
Yep...Right out of the Blue...Like the Joran arrest in November 2007...Best I remember that was totaly unexpected.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 12:58:35 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 01:00:09 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 01:06:00 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 01:08:24 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet



Why yes, yes I have been.  What with a hubby named veggie and all. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Or..................... ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 01:10:29 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet



Why yes, yes I have been.  What with a hubby named veggie and all. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Or..................... ::MonkeyShocked::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 01:20:36 PM
History:

Kermit has referred to my hubby as "Veggie" ever since he installed a drainage pipe and ... had the original pond on our proprerty that I had reserved for the frog filled in and ... made into a vegetable garden.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:20:49 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:21:58 PM
History:

Kermit has referred to my hubby as "Veggie" ever since he installed a drainage pipe and ... had the original pond on our proprerty that I had reserved for the frog filled in and ... made into a vegetable garden.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

You tell Hubby.They best be the most extrodinary Veggies to take precedence over the Frog! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 01:31:48 PM
History:

Kermit has referred to my hubby as "Veggie" ever since he installed a drainage pipe and ... had the original pond on our proprerty that I had reserved for the frog filled in and ... made into a vegetable garden.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

You tell Hubby.They best be the most extrodinary Veggies to take precedence over the Frog! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Somehow hubby tolerated the idea that his wife may have had an imaginary frog friend named Kermit.  However ... when I became hyserical when the pond was being filled in ... out of genuine concern ... he call a meeting with our grown kids ...

I learned a vauluable lesson.  I do not talk about Kermit around family.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:34:41 PM
History:

Kermit has referred to my hubby as "Veggie" ever since he installed a drainage pipe and ... had the original pond on our proprerty that I had reserved for the frog filled in and ... made into a vegetable garden.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

You tell Hubby.They best be the most extrodinary Veggies to take precedence over the Frog! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Somehow hubby tolerated the idea that his wife may have had an imaginary frog friend named Kermit.  However ... when I became hyserical when the pond was being filled in ... out of genuine concern ... he call a meeting with our grown kids ...

I learned a vauluable lesson.  I do not talk about Kermit around family.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

My girlfriend needs to know who Kermit is,that way she will be able to pay the proper respect if,she ever happens to see Kermit at the Lake,and or a pond! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 01:39:25 PM
Considering Beth Holloway and the FBI have received from the Natalee's Freebirds all of the info that Kyle Kingman shared in his own words regarding John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruba coverup ... I would assume that any investigation by the FBI that is going on behind the sences would dictate that both Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan are questioned.

Tim Tehran is the key to exposing with certainty this entire conspiracy.  I do not think for one moment that Tim would be in negotiations with major networks if he could not back up the ROV images with a first hand account of what he observed in that December 30, 2008 dive.

This is why Louis Shaeffer (ROV copyright), Kyle Kingsman (ROV analyst) and Tim Tahran (diver) are thisclose in regards to the network negotiations.

Obviously, Tim Trahan did not anticipate the leak of the ROV images on the internet by Kyle Kingman when he stated following the December 30, 2008 dive that there was "nothing" in the trap/cage.

Then when you stop and consider Tim Trahan, Kyle Kingman and Louis Shaefer's attempts at major network deals ... logic dictates there was "something" in that cage/trap.

Janet
_______


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


On Dec. 30, off the coast of Aruba, divers from the Aruban police force and the research vessel Persistence were about to make a crucial dive on a promising target in the search for Natalee Holloway.

The researchers had discovered a fish trap about 90 feet below the surface in almost the exact spot search expert Tim Miller had theorized Natalee’s body might be.

Team leader Tim Trahan suited up to join the Aruban police divers. As Tim Miller wished him well, the divers hit the water and the ROV was sent down to capture what would happen for everyone watching on board.

(On the boat)

Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap.

They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.

The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap.

The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat)

No it's thumbs down.

Negative, not it.

Crushing disppointment.

(On the boat)

Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?

Trahan: No.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




BUMP

Any thoughts?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:41:32 PM
I agree with the Tim idea.He dove on the trap,as well as trying to sell the footage.Wouldn't he know better then anyone??Where is he and what is he doing?

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 01:44:12 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

He has a company called GeoLab.  His Dutch company carries that name.  There are............I think 5? GeoLab's owned by Silvetti throughout the world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:44:40 PM
Considering Beth Holloway and the FBI have received from the Natalee's Freebirds all of the info that Kyle Kingman shared in his own words regarding John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruba coverup ... I would assume that any investigation by the FBI that is going on behind the sences would dictate that both Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan are questioned.

Tim Tehran is the key to exposing with certainty this entire conspiracy.  I do not think for one moment that Tim would be in negotiations with major networks if he could not back up the ROV images with a first hand account of what he observed in that December 30, 2008 dive.

This is why Louis Shaeffer (ROV copyright), Kyle Kingsman (ROV analyst) and Tim Tahran (diver) are thisclose in regards to the network negotiations.

Obviously, Tim Trahan did not anticipate the leak of the ROV images on the internet by Kyle Kingman when he stated following the December 30, 2008 dive that there was "nothing" in the trap/cage.

Then when you stop and consider Tim Trahan, Kyle Kingman and Louis Shaefer's attempts at major network deals ... logic dictates there was "something" in that cage/trap.

Janet
_______


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


On Dec. 30, off the coast of Aruba, divers from the Aruban police force and the research vessel Persistence were about to make a crucial dive on a promising target in the search for Natalee Holloway.

The researchers had discovered a fish trap about 90 feet below the surface in almost the exact spot search expert Tim Miller had theorized Natalee’s body might be.

Team leader Tim Trahan suited up to join the Aruban police divers. As Tim Miller wished him well, the divers hit the water and the ROV was sent down to capture what would happen for everyone watching on board.

(On the boat)

Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap.

They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.

The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap.

The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat)

No it's thumbs down.

Negative, not it.

Crushing disppointment.

(On the boat)

Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?

Trahan: No.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/




BUMP

Any thoughts?

Janet

Would be interesting to connect where the Persistence is at and what Silvetti,Schaefer(and his money),Kingman and Trahan are doing now! ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:46:43 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

He has a company called GeoLab.  His Dutch company carries that name.  There are............I think 5? GeoLab's owned by Silvetti throughout the world.

Are they all under different LLC's?Where do these companies have to be registered?Is he trying to hide some thing? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 01:49:42 PM
Tim Trahan and Luis Shaefer are, as far as I know, still partners in the company Underwater Expeditions.

When we began digging up info on Silvetti and Shaefer, that is when Kyle began to get nervous, became reticent about providing diver's names, and then was MIA from the forum.

He came back for a post or two around July I think.

Told us that Shaefer had "dissolved" the company, and fired Tim Trahan.

But research leads one to believe that not only is UE still in operation, but that it was also a partnership of some kind of Shaefer and Trahan's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: SS on January 29, 2009, 01:51:17 PM
January 6, 2009

Lifesong wrote:
Kermit -

While you're here....

I think you may have missed this from a post I made on 12/18. The sentiments are important to me, so I've copied them over:


Quote

<snipped>

4. Kermit - Thank you for your service to our country. I mean it, Thank You. Thank you for your sacrifice, your dedication, and your hard work throughout the course of your career. Every president we elect is my president. Thanks also on behalf of my 12 year old daughter for continuing to break down and hold open the doors for women to advance professionally. Equality is still elusive, but you've made lasting contributions and that should also be acknowledged.

No response necessary, dear frog, just thank you!! (Monkey Wink)



Kermit wrote:
Oh my goodness. Thank you. I had not seen that post. I'm humbled and I thank you for saying that. It means a lot.

January 02, 2009

ldstlou wrote:
another legit question...so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for? Can you explain how


Kermit wrote:
No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home.
A picture is worth a thousand words though.


January 3, 2009

Kermit wrote"
Good night monkeys, the pond awaits me tired frog legs.

I hope the posts help to clear up anything that may not be very clear up till now.

Thank you for your support Monkeys.
Thank you for the kind words.
Thank you for making me laugh when I wanted to .....well you know.

And thank you Patriot for your kind words, it touched my heart. It really did, in ways you don't know.
I've done a lot for our country, fighting the bad guys and exposing the truth you are the first person who said that to me. Means a lot. Thank you very much.

Edited to add another quote: "I can only tell you from my own experience, it's not like I knew what Kenneth Starr was going to do next"



((EDIT))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 01:55:22 PM
Tim Trahan and Luis Shaefer are, as far as I know, still partners in the company Underwater Expeditions.

When we began digging up info on Silvetti and Shaefer, that is when Kyle began to get nervous, became reticent about providing diver's names, and then was MIA from the forum.

He came back for a post or two around July I think.

Told us that Shaefer had "dissolved" the company, and fired Tim Trahan.

But research leads one to believe that not only is UE still in operation, but that it was also a partnership of some kind of Shaefer and Trahan's.

There has to be a way to locate where,as well as what there current work is pertaining to!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 01:57:27 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:00:06 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

What Law firms other the Van Der Sloot & Carlo set up those types of businesses.Well isn't VDS representing the other defendant along side Luis Mansur? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:05:07 PM
Here is what looks to have been a direct tie between Jeannette Richardson and Jan vd Straten.

And note the date Jan was still a member of this committe - WELL after he was supposed to be off the island and in Bonaire.

This appears to be a supporting connection between those two and the MEP party......

Also another interesting last name seems to have popped up on this committee as well.....



http://www.arubachamber.com/ComisionBonBoluntad.htm

COMISION BON BOLUNTAD ta un initiativa di gremionan comercial y sindical - den cuadro di nan responsabilidad civico - pa duna aporte na e proceso electoral y e sistema democratico arubano. E comision tabata activo durante e eleccionnan pa miembro di Parlamento na aña 1994, 1997 y 2001. Na april 2005 e comision a worde re-activa en conexión cu proximo eleccion, oficialmente stipula pa dia 23 di september 2005. E comision ta consisti di siete miembro y ta traha a base voluntario. Na final lo tene un evaluacion di e campaña electoral 2005.

aim of the comision:

*for give one contribucion at one campaña electoral clean, transparente y of level halto;

*garantiza oportunidad equal for cada faction politico;

*evita actonan of violencia, destruccion or cu is stroba faction politico of
funciona.

tarea of the comision:

* stipula reglanan of conducta for her period of campaña;

* monitor the campaña electoral y colecta datos financiero of the campaña;

*close one econvenio voluntario cu the partidonan politico cu will participa at eleccion day 23 of september 2005;

*deal kehonan tocante the reglanan of conducta y the campaña electoral provided that general;

*sanciona violacionnan of the convenio voluntario by denuncia publico;

*publica one evaluacion of the proceso electoral y the relato financiero of campaña.

Members of Commission:


Dunador di trabao Ebby Arends – presidente di CBB
Lisette Malmberg – suplente


Sindicato: Jose Giron
Sixto Vrolijk – suplente


Enseñanza: Lydia Emerencia – vice presidente
Angelo Brete – suplente


Clero: Pader J. v/d Lee
Pader S. Tomasik – suplente


Cuerpo Policial: Jeannette Richardson
Jan v/d Straten – suplente



Secretario: Lorraine de Souza

That name sure does seem to pop up many places.Just sayin.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 02:05:18 PM
January 6, 2009

Lifesong wrote:
Kermit -

While you're here....

I think you may have missed this from a post I made on 12/18. The sentiments are important to me, so I've copied them over:


Quote

<snipped>

4. Kermit - Thank you for your service to our country. I mean it, Thank You. Thank you for your sacrifice, your dedication, and your hard work throughout the course of your career. Every president we elect is my president. Thanks also on behalf of my 12 year old daughter for continuing to break down and hold open the doors for women to advance professionally. Equality is still elusive, but you've made lasting contributions and that should also be acknowledged.

No response necessary, dear frog, just thank you!! (Monkey Wink)



Kermit wrote:
Oh my goodness. Thank you. I had not seen that post. I'm humbled and I thank you for saying that. It means a lot.

January 02, 2009

ldstlou wrote:
another legit question...so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for? Can you explain how


Kermit wrote:
No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home.
A picture is worth a thousand words though.


January 3, 2009

Kermit wrote"
Good night monkeys, the pond awaits me tired frog legs.

I hope the posts help to clear up anything that may not be very clear up till now.

Thank you for your support Monkeys.
Thank you for the kind words.
Thank you for making me laugh when I wanted to .....well you know.

And thank you Patriot for your kind words, it touched my heart. It really did, in ways you don't know.
I've done a lot for our country, fighting the bad guys and exposing the truth you are the first person who said that to me. Means a lot. Thank you very much.

Edited to add another quote: "I can only tell you from my own experience, it's not like I knew what Kenneth Starr was going to do next"



((EDIT))





Kermit is a boymonkey!  Recheck your facts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:06:40 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:11:34 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Your starting to scare me now Janet.You a psychic?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 02:16:27 PM
      ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:17:09 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Can someone please break out the Monkey riding in the car!TIA
Your starting to scare me now Janet.You a psychic?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:17:20 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 02:18:12 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 02:19:26 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:20:43 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

I think you're right Wreck!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:21:08 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

I think so too Magnolia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:21:10 PM
      ::MonkeyShocked::

A1 ... you thought I was a girl monkey too?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 02:21:20 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Magnolia is a lovely old woman monkey!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:21:42 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

I think so too Magnolia.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 02:22:36 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

Looks that way.  Looks like the whole C&G crew have compiled a bio (their version ONLY) on Kermie.

Hit and Run.........





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:23:29 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:25:18 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

I am not going to go there unless Kermit is on the forum and has the ability to respond if she/he is inclined.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:25:26 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Magnolia is a lovely old woman monkey!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Whew....thank goodness!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 29, 2009, 02:25:54 PM
ummmm

another suggestion.........

Be careful what you wish for ....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 02:26:09 PM
      ::MonkeyShocked::

A1 ... you thought I was a girl monkey too?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Yes, of course!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:26:34 PM
Everyone calm down!There's a Monkey loose in the cage! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 02:26:35 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Magnolia is a lovely old woman monkey!  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Yes She is Lovely...I don't know about the Old!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 02:26:35 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 02:29:36 PM
January 6, 2009

Lifesong wrote:
Kermit -

While you're here....

I think you may have missed this from a post I made on 12/18. The sentiments are important to me, so I've copied them over:


Quote

<snipped>

4. Kermit - Thank you for your service to our country. I mean it, Thank You. Thank you for your sacrifice, your dedication, and your hard work throughout the course of your career. Every president we elect is my president. Thanks also on behalf of my 12 year old daughter for continuing to break down and hold open the doors for women to advance professionally. Equality is still elusive, but you've made lasting contributions and that should also be acknowledged.

No response necessary, dear frog, just thank you!! (Monkey Wink)



Kermit wrote:
Oh my goodness. Thank you. I had not seen that post. I'm humbled and I thank you for saying that. It means a lot.

January 02, 2009

ldstlou wrote:
another legit question...so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for? Can you explain how


Kermit wrote:
No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home.
A picture is worth a thousand words though.


January 3, 2009

Kermit wrote"
Good night monkeys, the pond awaits me tired frog legs.

I hope the posts help to clear up anything that may not be very clear up till now.

Thank you for your support Monkeys.
Thank you for the kind words.
Thank you for making me laugh when I wanted to .....well you know.

And thank you Patriot for your kind words, it touched my heart. It really did, in ways you don't know.
I've done a lot for our country, fighting the bad guys and exposing the truth you are the first person who said that to me. Means a lot. Thank you very much.

Edited to add another quote: "I can only tell you from my own experience, it's not like I knew what Kenneth Starr was going to do next"



((EDIT))






You folks are the biggest hypocrites I've ever met.  You b*tched and b*tched about Kermit posting an email.  You yourself just threatened to sue over some alledged personal information being exposed and you have the nerve to do this!  I have no respect for any of you!  While I don't believe your post, if it were true, it wouldn't change the fact that every post of Kermit's pertaining to the Persistence search has been backed up.  None from your group of drive by distractors has.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:30:10 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Magnolia is a lovely wise woman monkey!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


.... and that is the truth.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 02:30:42 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

He has a company called GeoLab.  His Dutch company carries that name.  There are............I think 5? GeoLab's owned by Silvetti throughout the world.

Are they all under different LLC's?Where do these companies have to be registered?Is he trying to hide some thing? ::MonkeyCool::

Here's some stuff............


SILVETTI/GEOLAB

GeoLab Group announced the appointment of Mr. C. J. Appleyard as General Manager for GeoLab LLC. Mr. Appleyard, formerly Survey Manager for Oceaneering and a Senior Consultant to BP's Deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations, will head up the Groups America's region following a reorganization in Q4, 2001. GeoLab will change the operational name from GeoLab Silvetti and Company LLC to GeoLab LLC forthwith with the corporate office in Houston, Texas and an operational base in Lafayette, Louisiana.

GeoLab LLC is a member of the GeoLab Group of Companies providing extensive experience in supporting a diverse range of specialist data-gathering, survey and seabed mapping services to support the marine construction, hydrocarbon, telecommunication, and maritime industries worldwide.

The GeoLab group of companies operates through a network of strategically located companies to provide its customers with a global service. Experienced field proven professionals, whom in turn service the needs of their local customers, manage each entity. The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies; GeoLab Technical Services Ltd. (UK), GeoLab srl. (Italy), GeoLab bv (Netherlands), GeoLab LLC (USA) and GeoLab Technical Services Nigeria Ltd. (Nigeria).

The services provided by the company are subject to an ISO 9002 control process to ensure that the deliverable items satisfy the clients' requirements. The extent of services covered by the accreditation covers all supporting activities inclusive of Project and Operational Management compliance functions and is summarized within the scope of the ISO charter. Health, Safety, Environmental and Risk management are all components of the system, which dovetail into the Quality compliance process.

For information contact GeoLab LLC at +713-457 0411 or by e-mail at info@geolab.cc http://www.e-pageads.com/survey-marketplace/newsletter/newsletter71.html#2
-------------------

TRAHAN/SHAEFER/UNDERWATER EXPEDITIONS


SCHAEFER AND UNDERWATER EXPEDITIONS- TRAHAN Search For Natalee HollowayKPLC-TV, LA - 18 hours agoTrahan and Lake Charles native Louis Schaefer Jr. head up Underwater Expeditions  around the world. ...
lcpirate.com/2007/12/24/ Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions  said. “We can’t stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we’ve located it, we just need to get to it.”

THIS HAS A LINK TO HIS 2 WEBSITES -TOP LINK FISHING- SECOND LINK SCUBA DIVING TOURS

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab
Located in Freeport, TX

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/
Underwater Expeditions - 1010 West Second St.Freeport, TX 77541
 
Directions from Houston 288 South, then a left @ 2nd. St. in FreeportGo 1.5 miles and we are on the left
http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/fishing

TIM TRAHAN'S SPECIALITIES
Underwater Expeditions, Offshore Fishing, Scuba Diving Charters
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab

fishing charters - boats usedThe "Big E"

Capt. Casey

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html
 H2O DIVING TOURS
Scuba Diving VacationsCaribbean Dive   Travel and World Diving   Specializing in offering the HOTTEST Deals

http://www.h2otours.net/

DOES TRIPS TO CURACAO
http://www.h2otours.net/curacao.htm



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 29, 2009, 02:31:26 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.


Magnolia...I usually agree with you....but....I think...Janet is a girlmonkey and Kermit may
just be a girl monkey too....and since KTF has just outed himself, we may have more surprises ahead.   

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 02:31:26 PM
Scrollin Scrollin Scrollin...Keep Those Monkeys Rollin...  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:31:55 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Magnolia is a lovely old woman monkey!  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Yes She is Lovely...I don't know about the Old!  ::MonkeyWink::

Old? No way!  But I'm sure glad she's a woman; I haven't completely lost it!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 02:32:27 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

Magnolia,

I've seen posts about Silvetti purportedly went to a Mansur wedding.  Do you know an approximate date for that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:32:52 PM
Good Morning Keepthefaith.

It is REALLY quiet in the cage this morning.

Maybe we need a "drive by" to get up going.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Janet

Bite your tongue, woman!!!!!!! ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Woman!!!

Jen ... have been under the impression for the past four years that I am a "woman".

Janet

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyEek::

... and what does Magnolia have to say for herself?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Magnolia is a lovely wise woman monkey!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


.... and that is the truth.

Hugs

Janet

I agree!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:33:20 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

Magnolia,

I've seen posts about Silvetti purportedly went to a Mansur wedding.  Do you know an approximate date for that?

It's got to be in the Diario.One would think.No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 02:34:11 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

Magnolia,

I've seen posts about Silvetti purportedly went to a Mansur wedding.  Do you know an approximate date for that?

I don't have time to look right now, but if someone else doesn't find it; I'll look after work.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 02:35:23 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

In order to set up shop in Aruba, Silvetti would have to have an
Aruban partner.  I think that is where the Mansurs come in.

Magnolia,

I've seen posts about Silvetti purportedly went to a Mansur wedding.  Do you know an approximate date for that?

Jen, I think it was June.  At least that is what popped into my head.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 02:36:30 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.

Whew....  Thanks Mags for clearing that up for me.

I had my suspicions.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:37:44 PM
In regards to Silvetti setting up shop in Aruba or Venezuela.Did he partner up with a dutch firm and what is there business name?Do you know Jen?

He has a company called GeoLab.  His Dutch company carries that name.  There are............I think 5? GeoLab's owned by Silvetti throughout the world.

Are they all under different LLC's?Where do these companies have to be registered?Is he trying to hide some thing? ::MonkeyCool::

Here's some stuff............


SILVETTI/GEOLAB

GeoLab Group announced the appointment of Mr. C. J. Appleyard as General Manager for GeoLab LLC. Mr. Appleyard, formerly Survey Manager for Oceaneering and a Senior Consultant to BP's Deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations, will head up the Groups America's region following a reorganization in Q4, 2001. GeoLab will change the operational name from GeoLab Silvetti and Company LLC to GeoLab LLC forthwith with the corporate office in Houston, Texas and an operational base in Lafayette, Louisiana.

GeoLab LLC is a member of the GeoLab Group of Companies providing extensive experience in supporting a diverse range of specialist data-gathering, survey and seabed mapping services to support the marine construction, hydrocarbon, telecommunication, and maritime industries worldwide.

The GeoLab group of companies operates through a network of strategically located companies to provide its customers with a global service. Experienced field proven professionals, whom in turn service the needs of their local customers, manage each entity. The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies; GeoLab Technical Services Ltd. (UK), GeoLab srl. (Italy), GeoLab bv (Netherlands), GeoLab LLC (USA) and GeoLab Technical Services Nigeria Ltd. (Nigeria).

The services provided by the company are subject to an ISO 9002 control process to ensure that the deliverable items satisfy the clients' requirements. The extent of services covered by the accreditation covers all supporting activities inclusive of Project and Operational Management compliance functions and is summarized within the scope of the ISO charter. Health, Safety, Environmental and Risk management are all components of the system, which dovetail into the Quality compliance process.

For information contact GeoLab LLC at +713-457 0411 or by e-mail at info@geolab.cc http://www.e-pageads.com/survey-marketplace/newsletter/newsletter71.html#2
-------------------

TRAHAN/SHAEFER/UNDERWATER EXPEDITIONS


SCHAEFER AND UNDERWATER EXPEDITIONS- TRAHAN Search For Natalee HollowayKPLC-TV, LA - 18 hours agoTrahan and Lake Charles native Louis Schaefer Jr. head up Underwater Expeditions  around the world. ...
lcpirate.com/2007/12/24/ Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions  said. “We can’t stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we’ve located it, we just need to get to it.”

THIS HAS A LINK TO HIS 2 WEBSITES -TOP LINK FISHING- SECOND LINK SCUBA DIVING TOURS

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab
Located in Freeport, TX

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/
Underwater Expeditions - 1010 West Second St.Freeport, TX 77541
 
Directions from Houston 288 South, then a left @ 2nd. St. in FreeportGo 1.5 miles and we are on the left
http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/fishing

TIM TRAHAN'S SPECIALITIES
Underwater Expeditions, Offshore Fishing, Scuba Diving Charters
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/a71/5ab

fishing charters - boats usedThe "Big E"

Capt. Casey

http://www.underwaterexpeditions.com/boats.html
 H2O DIVING TOURS
Scuba Diving VacationsCaribbean Dive   Travel and World Diving   Specializing in offering the HOTTEST Deals

http://www.h2otours.net/

DOES TRIPS TO CURACAO
http://www.h2otours.net/curacao.htm



So Appleyard was a Senior Consultant for BP whom has a Major presence in South America.Is that right?What would entice Appleyard to leave BP to go to GeoLab LLC?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 02:40:26 PM
Hmmm.............

Kyle did tell us on June 16 that John was back in Aruba for some "business relations".

I wonder if John considered Jossy (or one of the mansur's) to be a "business relation"?

Would love to have the date of that wedding..............thanks to all the Monkeys who are looking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 02:41:43 PM
(http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/2531/emailscreenshotheaderfrcg3.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:45:05 PM
REMINDER:

THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION - JOHN SILVETTI


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
:  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:  The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 02:46:23 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

I am not going to go there unless Kermit is on the forum and has the ability to respond if she/he is inclined.

Janet

That name was the name Hotshot posted here at SM.
They are researching the name given to someone. I know exactly who that was and I figure she gave it to Hotshot so that Hotshot could use it as a vindictive measure.


It isn't going to change anything about the information/truth posted about RV Persistence and that is what they are trying to accomplish.

It ONLY ADDS to the FACT that SS is posting personal information.
Something she accused me and Janet of doing.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:48:44 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.


Magnolia...I usually agree with you....but....I think...Janet is a girlmonkey and Kermit may
just be a girl monkey too....and since KTF has just outed himself, we may have more surprises ahead.   

 ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:49:34 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.


Magnolia...I usually agree with you....but....I think...Janet is a girlmonkey and Kermit may
just be a girl monkey too....and since KTF has just outed himself, we may have more surprises ahead.   

 ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Maybe a new hairdo for Janet before Valentine's Day? ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:53:25 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

I am not going to go there unless Kermit is on the forum and has the ability to respond if she/he is inclined.

Janet

That name was the name Hotshot posted here at SM.
They are researching the name given to someone. I know exactly who that was and I figure she gave it to Hotshot so that Hotshot could use it as a vindictive measure.


It isn't going to change anything about the information/truth posted about RV Persistence and that is what they are trying to accomplish.

It ONLY ADDS to the FACT that SS is posting personal information.
Something she accused me and Janet of doing.


Kermit ... I will continue posting my "REMINDERS" regarding the John Silvetti betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway  ... the betrayal that Kyle Kingman revealed in his own words.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 02:57:26 PM
KERMIT - I deleted that part of SS's post that she chose to bring over here from CnG.  Seems as though SS is wanted to get banned from SM.  If that is the case I won't ban her, why give her what she wants?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 02:57:42 PM
The people at Chat and Grumble, SS and Hotshot included apparently, as they have exposed that here.
Are wrong.
So, had they not followed what someone else told them they would have known:
I have been involved in many high profile cases.
I have accomplished busting drug rings, a president of the US, etc.

And I am not going to spend my time on stupidity. It only exposes what they do as opposed to bring something of importance to the discussion about Natalee. IS that what that site is all about?
Who is next from scared monkeys at their site?


If they think I am afraid - lets bring it on!

How about I expose THEM?











Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 02:57:54 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

I am not going to go there unless Kermit is on the forum and has the ability to respond if she/he is inclined.

Janet

That name was the name Hotshot posted here at SM.
They are researching the name given to someone. I know exactly who that was and I figure she gave it to Hotshot so that Hotshot could use it as a vindictive measure.


It isn't going to change anything about the information/truth posted about RV Persistence and that is what they are trying to accomplish.

It ONLY ADDS to the FACT that SS is posting personal information.
Something she accused me and Janet of doing.


Kermit ... I will continue posting my "REMINDERS" regarding the John Silvetti betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway  ... the betrayal that Kyle Kingman revealed in his own words.

Janet


STAY FOCUSED.....THE PERSISTENCE IS WHERE IT'S AT........ ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 02:59:13 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.


Magnolia...I usually agree with you....but....I think...Janet is a girlmonkey and Kermit may
just be a girl monkey too....and since KTF has just outed himself, we may have more surprises ahead.   

 ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Maybe a new hairdo for Janet before Valentine's Day? ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Keepthefaith ... the Blonde wig IS my new look that CBB give me so that all eyes would be cast in my direction when I walked into our church's Valentines Day party.

However ... after Valentine's Day I will have CBB return me to my original "Toasted Almond" ... out out-of-bottle ... hair.  Hubby goes nuts when he sees me in the wig and ... he cries when I take it off.  It is not a pretty sight.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 02:59:42 PM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???

I am not going to go there unless Kermit is on the forum and has the ability to respond if she/he is inclined.

Janet

That name was the name Hotshot posted here at SM.
They are researching the name given to someone. I know exactly who that was and I figure she gave it to Hotshot so that Hotshot could use it as a vindictive measure.


It isn't going to change anything about the information/truth posted about RV Persistence and that is what they are trying to accomplish.

It ONLY ADDS to the FACT that SS is posting personal information.
Something she accused me and Janet of doing.


Kermit ... I will continue posting my "REMINDERS" regarding the John Silvetti betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway  ... the betrayal that Kyle Kingman revealed in his own words.

Janet


I was just telling someone that Janet at SM writes the best recaps of information I have ever seen. She's a pro!

You did not do anything wrong.
As you can see SS just proved to everyone what kind of person she is and what she and her friends are trying to do.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:01:21 PM
The people at Chat and Grumble, SS and Hotshot included apparently, as they have exposed that here.
Are wrong.
So, had they not followed what someone else told them they would have known:
I have been involved in many high profile cases.
I have accomplished busting drug rings, a president of the US, etc.

And I am not going to spend my time on stupidity. It only exposes what they do as opposed to bring something of importance to the discussion about Natalee. IS that what that site is all about?
Who is next from scared monkeys at their site?


If they think I am afraid - lets bring it on!

How about I expose THEM?











For God's Sake Kermit.Please tell me before you do so i may put on my Feces suit before the Sh_t starts to fly! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 03:02:38 PM
KERMIT - I deleted that part of SS's post that she chose to bring over here from CnG.  Seems as though SS is wanted to get banned from SM.  If that is the case I won't ban her, why give her what she wants?

I agree with you.

She made accusations that were totally uncalled for to Janet and myself and she was clearly mistaken or lying.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:05:17 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 03:05:58 PM
The people at Chat and Grumble, SS and Hotshot included apparently, as they have exposed that here.
Are wrong.
So, had they not followed what someone else told them they would have known:
I have been involved in many high profile cases.
I have accomplished busting drug rings, a president of the US, etc.

And I am not going to spend my time on stupidity. It only exposes what they do as opposed to bring something of importance to the discussion about Natalee. IS that what that site is all about?
Who is next from scared monkeys at their site?


If they think I am afraid - lets bring it on!

How about I expose THEM?











For God's Sake Kermit.Please tell me before you do so i may put on my Feces suit before the Sh_t starts to fly! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

This is one of their members, one of lalasmom and Idstlou's buddies who is their LEAK:
Remember, It was Idstlou who posted that I was lying about not having lalasmom's emails.

Who is lying? You be the judge:

(http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/2531/emailscreenshotheaderfrcg3.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: SuzieQ on January 29, 2009, 03:08:07 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 03:08:31 PM
Explanation:

I only left part of lalasmom's email and blacked out the rest so that it will PROVE to Idstlou
that what I said was the truth. She seems to require that. No one can see the rest of lalasmom's email.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 03:09:21 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.

Whoa!
Caps must have lied to the monkeys. He said you did need a partner.

Good find SuzieQ


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:10:04 PM
The people at Chat and Grumble, SS and Hotshot included apparently, as they have exposed that here.
Are wrong.
So, had they not followed what someone else told them they would have known:
I have been involved in many high profile cases.
I have accomplished busting drug rings, a president of the US, etc.

And I am not going to spend my time on stupidity. It only exposes what they do as opposed to bring something of importance to the discussion about Natalee. IS that what that site is all about?
Who is next from scared monkeys at their site?


If they think I am afraid - lets bring it on!

How about I expose THEM?











For God's Sake Kermit.Please tell me before you do so i may put on my Feces suit before the Sh_t starts to fly! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

This is one of their members, one of lalasmom and Idstlou's buddies who is their LEAK:
Remember, It was Idstlou who posted that I was lying about not having lalasmom's emails.

Who is lying? You be the judge:

(http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/2531/emailscreenshotheaderfrcg3.jpg)

No worries Kermit.The TRUTH is what it is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:10:50 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.

Whoa!
Caps must have lied to the monkeys. He said you did need a partner.

Good find SuzieQ

CapsLockWizard Lie! ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 03:11:43 PM
Janet, you got your wish!   We got a drive-by.

I am so confused.  Janet, you are a girl monkey, right?

Kermit = Girl monkey or Boy monkey

Help

 ::MonkeyEek::

Janet is a girlmonkey......Kermit is a boymonkey and SS is
a vindictive story teller.

Yep she is and I would love to post my resume.
But it's better that I know they are following what hotshot says and their other LEAK.
Cuz, it's just funnier.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 03:12:35 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.

Whoa!
Caps must have lied to the monkeys. He said you did need a partner.

Good find SuzieQ

CapsLockWizard Lie! ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

I want to say something funny but can't cuz you made me laugh.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 03:15:59 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.
Whoa!
Caps must have lied to the monkeys. He said you did need a partner.

Good find SuzieQ


CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #931 on: December 03, 2008, 04:19:56 AM »


11, on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:16:23 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 03:22:45 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.

Whoa!
Caps must have lied to the monkeys. He said you did need a partner.

Good find SuzieQ

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/ArubaFreeZone.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 03:24:58 PM
 ::MonkeyShocked::


I am gone one morning and look what happens!

This attacking of a poster is unacceptable.

One should never do that.

ATTACK THE POSTS, NOT THE POSTER!

Interesting how you can tell who is a member as the disgruntled forum.  And I do hope they realize that some of those alphabet agencies don't appreciate snoops.  Some of them snoop back!

But I guess this is what happens when there is no legitimate defense of the information posted.  They can't refute it so they attack the messenger?

I don't care if Kermit is a Circus Clown!  That doesn't change one bit what Kyle stated in his own posts.

Pathetic and disgusting.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 29, 2009, 03:25:23 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::

KTF...I think I answered this before...but...here goes.  I was invited to join a "new forum" by someone I thought was a friend.  It soon became apparent that this was a private, controlled forum that operated on two levels...the one for those of us who were not part of the inner circle...and another whole group who were in the secret section.  Once I became aware that this existed, I asked to be deleted...so I was there for a short time and then poof...!  Would there be any other questions?   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:30:04 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::

KTF...I think I answered this before...but...here goes.  I was invited to join a "new forum" by someone I thought was a friend.  It soon became apparent that this was a private, controlled forum that operated on two levels...the one for those of us who were not part of the inner circle...and another whole group who were in the secret section.  Once I became aware that this existed, I asked to be deleted...so I was there for a short time and then poof...!  Would there be any other questions?   ::MonkeyWink::

Thank You Mere.There is no problem in being a member of other forums.I applaud you for being deleted.What trouble's me is that if your a member there,and are aware of what is taking place,and continue to frequent that forum. ::MonkeyConfused:: I think that speaks volumes!


KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 03:30:59 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::

KTF...I think I answered this before...but...here goes.  I was invited to join a "new forum" by someone I thought was a friend.  It soon became apparent that this was a private, controlled forum that operated on two levels...the one for those of us who were not part of the inner circle...and another whole group who were in the secret section.  Once I became aware that this existed, I asked to be deleted...so I was there for a short time and then poof...!  Would there be any other questions?   ::MonkeyWink::


MeMere, I do have a question.

What is the stated goal of this forum, its Mission Statement, sotaspeak.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 03:31:04 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:33:28 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/

Thanx Hotping!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 29, 2009, 03:41:33 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::

KTF...I think I answered this before...but...here goes.  I was invited to join a "new forum" by someone I thought was a friend.  It soon became apparent that this was a private, controlled forum that operated on two levels...the one for those of us who were not part of the inner circle...and another whole group who were in the secret section.  Once I became aware that this existed, I asked to be deleted...so I was there for a short time and then poof...!  Would there be any other questions?   ::MonkeyWink::


MeMere, I do have a question.

What is the stated goal of this forum, its Mission Statement, sotaspeak.




Anna...I don't think that there is a written mission statement...at least I did not see one.  I do think now that it may be a grouping of monkeys who felt that they could "do it better" than SM. 

My feelings on this are strong so it is best that I not just fly off the handle so to speak...lol. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 29, 2009, 03:42:33 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::

KTF...I think I answered this before...but...here goes.  I was invited to join a "new forum" by someone I thought was a friend.  It soon became apparent that this was a private, controlled forum that operated on two levels...the one for those of us who were not part of the inner circle...and another whole group who were in the secret section.  Once I became aware that this existed, I asked to be deleted...so I was there for a short time and then poof...!  Would there be any other questions?   ::MonkeyWink::

Hi Mere,

I too was a member for a short time, like you I was invited by same friend. I left some time ago. But I remember a strong warning that nothing was to be copied from that site. I wasn't allowed in the super secret hidey hole either, no S after my "Member."

I also remember posts from here being copied there...Go figure...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 03:42:33 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I find it very telling that this has illicited no response.Why be a member somewhere and not be able to admit it?If your a member there you must know what's going on! ::MonkeyNoNo::

KTF, Save your breath.  I called them out on this last night..... no response.  They have been afforded the opportunity to come here and defend their stance and continue to refuse to do so.  Instead, they chose to come here and slander fellow posters with absolutely no facts to back themselves up. 

They keep sending "messengers" over here to post their garbage but we are not privy to post at their site.  Why don't they open their forum and make it public?   Afraid to?!!!
 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 03:46:10 PM
Thanks, MeMere,

I do understand and have had to bite my tongue many times as well.
Sometimes it's best and especially if that's what childish people really want, a fight.

That's all I can see coming from there, people trying to start a fight in the monkey cage.

Silliness!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 03:47:14 PM
REMINDER:

Kyle Kingman ... in his own words reveal ... that Natalee Holloway's remain could have been in the the trap/cage discovered by the Persistance undertaking and ... the contents recovered by the Aruban enemy ... the Aruban enemy who has prevented justice from prevailing from the getgo.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle:  The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle:  We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle:  The most likely to remain at or near it's original location was the skull, which is why I was so convinced the object pictured was a skull.









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 03:47:43 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I can answer this , at least in my opinion...which is rather accurate.

Some can be members because some do not have the "privilages" to be "allowed" in thier inner sanctum of the forum...that's right, you join a invite only group, yet not allowed in certain areas. Many i do not think were aware if it even existing til much of it was getting mentioned. Didint really bother me because i fiugured all i needed to know about Nah was here anyways..

There were three sets of members..1.Member (run of the mill come and post and read and whatever members)..2. member (i think now these were put on some kind of trial period, because they all have been banned now)..3 MemberS (the ones allowed to the other areas.

I wasnt aware of how deep it all went til the other day after i posted in here, SM, a few times and DARED laugh at a post a friend made. I went into cng to read up on any news on Caylee case, i saw a new post made in the "looks whats posted at sm" thread, so i went to read. I guess we arent allowed to laugh or do anything that seems in conflict of whatever they have goin on in there because I saw my post and what i was replying to posted in there. I then asked why that post of all the posts that were posted you chose that one?

Here was my answer (not the complete post, nor mine) but you will see what was and i never knew expected of us as members there. I am not even gonna mention names unless it comes to a point of having to.

ME--Like what is the reason for postin that particular post?? Out of the many posts posted in sm today..?

Part of my answer that was given to me By (NAMELESS for now)---"Since you two are members here I thought you would be impartial and spread the truth about the horrible lies Klaas and others are telling there about members in this forum..But instead you contribute to it. "

ME-- (parts of my answer )--- First of all i never became a member here to "spread anything" , I wasnt aware being a member here means I need to "spread the truth about the horrible lies Klaas and others are telling there about members in this forum" (his words, not mine)Ever wonder why i never posted in this thread, tho i do read it?? it's called being IMPARTIAL. Impartial to forums..but i do have opinions, and i do voice them where i see fit, and heck, if i find sumtin funny i will laugh..so the heck what? Dont include me on this so called war everyone has going on, im not part of it.

ME-- (after thinkin about it more and gettin p'd) ya know what I been thinkin and would like to add, ..before i even joined here, when i was asked, i was assured in order to be a member didnt mean i had to hate sm or klaas. I cant hate or say rotten things about people i see no rotten in.


I guess it wasnt to thier satisfaction, when logging back in i found i was no longer to read the general discussions anymore OR the memberlist, which they guard highly for some stupid reason.

 So to answer you why some may still be there...its becuase i dont think they know all that really goes on. Like me, prolly just tryin to read important stuff and tryin to graze over the BS, i chalked a lot of what i saw as sumtin i seen for years on the net..just another cross forums squabble. But i guess it isnt, there are people hurtin people and tryin to ruin them and LORD forbid you are actually tryin to be impartial, seems the definition of impartial has not hit thier sshh yet. Or i would have told them exactly what i thought of all thier smearin and BS.

sorry if this posts way after the fact, but i have comp "issues" but wanted to answer that. and show what is expected of the members as shown in the above posts. Perhaps also would be able to explain to some who have questioned the same thing inre: distruptions. It's like a campaign or sumtin i guess over there in the unberbelly of it all where i didnt even know what went on in is a heck of a lot more than just natalee case stuff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 03:48:01 PM
REMINDER:

Kyle Kingman ... in his own words reveal ... that Natalee Holloway's remain could have been in the the trap/cage discovered by the Persistance undertaking and ... the contents recovered by the Aruban enemy ... the Aruban enemy who has prevented justice from prevailing from the getgo.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle:  The blue tarp and blue fabric was confirmed by Richardson and Mos. Remember, they each only confirmed one piece. One confirmed blue fabric, the other confirmed tarp. From the video you see both.

Kyle:  We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle:  The most likely to remain at or near it's original location was the skull, which is why I was so convinced the object pictured was a skull.









AMEN.LOGIC DICTATES ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 03:48:47 PM
Don't know if this would apply to Silvitti, but in the Aruba Free Zone you do not need a local partner.


http://www.fzanv.com/

Check out Advantages and benefits and Types of Business's allowed.

Whoa!
Caps must have lied to the monkeys. He said you did need a partner.

Good find SuzieQ

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/ArubaFreeZone.jpg)

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #931 on: December 03, 2008, 04:19:56 AM »


11, on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 03:51:15 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I can answer this , at least in my opinion...which is rather accurate.

Some can be members because some do not have the "privilages" to be "allowed" in thier inner sanctum of the forum...that's right, you join a invite only group, yet not allowed in certain areas. Many i do not think were aware if it even existing til much of it was getting mentioned. Didint really bother me because i fiugured all i needed to know about Nah was here anyways..

There were three sets of members..1.Member (run of the mill come and post and read and whatever members)..2. member (i think now these were put on some kind of trial period, because they all have been banned now)..3 MemberS (the ones allowed to the other areas.

I wasnt aware of how deep it all went til the other day after i posted in here, SM, a few times and DARED laugh at a post a friend made. I went into cng to read up on any news on Caylee case, i saw a new post made in the "looks whats posted at sm" thread, so i went to read. I guess we arent allowed to laugh or do anything that seems in conflict of whatever they have goin on in there because I saw my post and what i was replying to posted in there. I then asked why that post of all the posts that were posted you chose that one?

Here was my answer (not the complete post, nor mine) but you will see what was and i never knew expected of us as members there. I am not even gonna mention names unless it comes to a point of having to.

ME--Like what is the reason for postin that particular post?? Out of the many posts posted in sm today..?

Part of my answer that was given to me By (NAMELESS for now)---"Since you two are members here I thought you would be impartial and spread the truth about the horrible lies Klaas and others are telling there about members in this forum..But instead you contribute to it. "

ME-- (parts of my answer )--- First of all i never became a member here to "spread anything" , I wasnt aware being a member here means I need to "spread the truth about the horrible lies Klaas and others are telling there about members in this forum" (his words, not mine)Ever wonder why i never posted in this thread, tho i do read it?? it's called being IMPARTIAL. Impartial to forums..but i do have opinions, and i do voice them where i see fit, and heck, if i find sumtin funny i will laugh..so the heck what? Dont include me on this so called war everyone has going on, im not part of it.

ME-- (after thinkin about it more and gettin p'd) ya know what I been thinkin and would like to add, ..before i even joined here, when i was asked, i was assured in order to be a member didnt mean i had to hate sm or klaas. I cant hate or say rotten things about people i see no rotten in.


I guess it wasnt to thier satisfaction, when logging back in i found i was no longer to read the general discussions anymore OR the memberlist, which they guard highly for some stupid reason.

 So to answer you why some may still be there...its becuase i dont think they know all that really goes on. Like me, prolly just tryin to read important stuff and tryin to graze over the BS, i chalked a lot of what i saw as sumtin i seen for years on the net..just another cross forums squabble. But i guess it isnt, there are people hurtin people and tryin to ruin them and LORD forbid you are actually tryin to be impartial, seems the definition of impartial has not hit thier sshh yet. Or i would have told them exactly what i thought of all thier smearin and BS.

sorry if this posts way after the fact, but i have comp "issues" but wanted to answer that. and show what is expected of the members as shown in the above posts. Perhaps also would be able to explain to some who have questioned the same thing inre: distruptions. It's like a campaign or sumtin i guess over there in the unberbelly of it all where i didnt even know what went on in is a heck of a lot more than just natalee case stuff.

Seamonkey, thank you for your honesty.  Member there or not, the distractors are obvious and it's always been obvious you weren't one of those.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 03:56:45 PM
and for the record, i never hid the fact i was a member, just wasnt til the other day i even knew people actually wont say they are..which i dont understand. I mean if ya part of sumtin that has nothing to hide, why not say you are when asked? Oh wait..silly me, there are things to hide...or they would be talkin for themselves when addressed


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:00:54 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/

 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Shame, shame Kyle.  It was Shaefer who approached Tim Miller.

Interesting that it was Kyle himself requesting donations as late as Feb 8th.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:01:32 PM
and for the record, i never hid the fact i was a member, just wasnt til the other day i even knew people actually wont say they are..which i dont understand. I mean if ya part of sumtin that has nothing to hide, why not say you are when asked? Oh wait..silly me, there are things to hide...or they would be talkin for themselves when addressed

Thanx SeaMonkey for the insight.You are very kind and honest unlike many of those fron CnG.It is unfortunate these people act in such away.Reminds me of the playground in elementary school.OK.Back to the Focus.JUSTICE FOR NATALEE....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:03:44 PM
OK.I must ask.If you are a memeber at CnG and are aware of what is going on.How can you affiliate yourself with such nonsense?? ::MonkeyTongue::

I can answer this , at least in my opinion...which is rather accurate.

Some can be members because some do not have the "privilages" to be "allowed" in thier inner sanctum of the forum...that's right, you join a invite only group, yet not allowed in certain areas. Many i do not think were aware if it even existing til much of it was getting mentioned. Didint really bother me because i fiugured all i needed to know about Nah was here anyways..

There were three sets of members..1.Member (run of the mill come and post and read and whatever members)..2. member (i think now these were put on some kind of trial period, because they all have been banned now)..3 MemberS (the ones allowed to the other areas.

I wasnt aware of how deep it all went til the other day after i posted in here, SM, a few times and DARED laugh at a post a friend made. I went into cng to read up on any news on Caylee case, i saw a new post made in the "looks whats posted at sm" thread, so i went to read. I guess we arent allowed to laugh or do anything that seems in conflict of whatever they have goin on in there because I saw my post and what i was replying to posted in there. I then asked why that post of all the posts that were posted you chose that one?

Here was my answer (not the complete post, nor mine) but you will see what was and i never knew expected of us as members there. I am not even gonna mention names unless it comes to a point of having to.

ME--Like what is the reason for postin that particular post?? Out of the many posts posted in sm today..?

Part of my answer that was given to me By (NAMELESS for now)---"Since you two are members here I thought you would be impartial and spread the truth about the horrible lies Klaas and others are telling there about members in this forum..But instead you contribute to it. "

ME-- (parts of my answer )--- First of all i never became a member here to "spread anything" , I wasnt aware being a member here means I need to "spread the truth about the horrible lies Klaas and others are telling there about members in this forum" (his words, not mine)Ever wonder why i never posted in this thread, tho i do read it?? it's called being IMPARTIAL. Impartial to forums..but i do have opinions, and i do voice them where i see fit, and heck, if i find sumtin funny i will laugh..so the heck what? Dont include me on this so called war everyone has going on, im not part of it.

ME-- (after thinkin about it more and gettin p'd) ya know what I been thinkin and would like to add, ..before i even joined here, when i was asked, i was assured in order to be a member didnt mean i had to hate sm or klaas. I cant hate or say rotten things about people i see no rotten in.


I guess it wasnt to thier satisfaction, when logging back in i found i was no longer to read the general discussions anymore OR the memberlist, which they guard highly for some stupid reason.

 So to answer you why some may still be there...its becuase i dont think they know all that really goes on. Like me, prolly just tryin to read important stuff and tryin to graze over the BS, i chalked a lot of what i saw as sumtin i seen for years on the net..just another cross forums squabble. But i guess it isnt, there are people hurtin people and tryin to ruin them and LORD forbid you are actually tryin to be impartial, seems the definition of impartial has not hit thier sshh yet. Or i would have told them exactly what i thought of all thier smearin and BS.

sorry if this posts way after the fact, but i have comp "issues" but wanted to answer that. and show what is expected of the members as shown in the above posts. Perhaps also would be able to explain to some who have questioned the same thing inre: distruptions. It's like a campaign or sumtin i guess over there in the unberbelly of it all where i didnt even know what went on in is a heck of a lot more than just natalee case stuff.

Thanks for your honesty seamonkey.

The question that Keepthefaith the fortitude to ask ... is exactly what I was wanting to asking for a few days now but ... made the decision to hold off.

Thank you Keepthefaith.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 04:04:32 PM
well Ree, i think after today i wont be lol
But gawd it makes me sick and i wasnt about to just sit here thinking..."but i know the answer" and not say sumtin. I can only talk for myself. and thats what i responded to..from my own side.
and no i dont like disruptions ..i dont like whats goin on in here on and off. I was gone from being able to post here a year, it is not what it use to be, and its heartbreaking to me to see all that has gone on...and all of it is tracked down to a few people causin it all. Earlier, it WAS like it use to be, talking and discussing natalee and theories and news facts..until a cng pos posted. I guess i had my limit. My apologies to anyone HERE that may not have liked what i had to say that may have disrupted this further. I just couldnt sit and watch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:08:35 PM
well Ree, i think after today i wont be lol
But gawd it makes me sick and i wasnt about to just sit here thinking..."but i know the answer" and not say sumtin. I can only talk for myself. and thats what i responded to..from my own side.
and no i dont like disruptions ..i dont like whats goin on in here on and off. I was gone from being able to post here a year, it is not what it use to be, and its heartbreaking to me to see all that has gone on...and all of it is tracked down to a few people causin it all. Earlier, it WAS like it use to be, talking and discussing natalee and theories and news facts..until a cng pos posted. I guess i had my limit. My apologies to anyone HERE that may not have liked what i had to say that may have disrupted this further. I just couldnt sit and watch.

Again.Thanx SeaMonkey.Your always welcome with us Monkey's!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 04:10:14 PM
For the record, I have never known of Klaas to be "spreading lies" or any other kind of information about ANY posters, ever.

Sounds more to me like somebody with something to hide who is afraid the truth will get out some way and is being paranoid.  A person with issues of their own.

Klaas doesn't share information about posters with others.  Never has, probably never will.  And like most of you, I have been here a very long time to know this.

Just for the record.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:13:34 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/

 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Shame, shame Kyle.  It was Shaefer who approached Tim Miller.

Interesting that it was Kyle himself requesting donations as late as Feb 8th.....

So ol' OE was  knee-deep in everything including asking for what i would think would be FRAUDULENT donations?NO.For those that think he's a goof who acts like a 14yr old i beg to differ!Keep talkin!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 04:14:06 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:16:18 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/


 ::MonkeyShocked::

Thank you hotping.

As Beth Holloway would said ... "Greta ... this is huge!"

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking ... and Tim states to Jamie Colby of FOX that Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway while Tim Miller was at his home.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:17:21 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 04:18:57 PM

 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Shame, shame Kyle.  It was Shaefer who approached Tim Miller.

Interesting that it was Kyle himself requesting donations as late as Feb 8th.....


Yes, it is very interesting how all of this came about.  I have no problem with duel purpose searches but it has to be known up front that this is the deal.

I have only ever made donations to TES and I wonder if they actually gave money for this search.  I surely hope not.  Especially in light of the fact of the big loss on the Caylee effort.  And that is not over yet for Tim Miller. 

No wonder Tim Miller wants to retire!  Now he faces subpoena annoyances by the semi-lucid attorney for Casey Anthony.  I do hope Baez is required to pay any expenses Tim has to fly to Florida for all that mess.  He is just a man and can't possibly be expected to absorb unlimited expense just to operate this service.  In hard economic times, one of the first things to go are donations.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 04:19:48 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:21:15 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/


 ::MonkeyShocked::

Thank you hotping.

As Beth Holloway would said ... "Greta ... this is huge!"

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking ... and Tim states to Jamie Colby of FOX that Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway while Tim Miller was at his home.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »


The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world. The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after. It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found herI don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg625934#msg625934


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 04:21:39 PM
Seamonkey and Mere, I want you to know that I was not referring to you when I posted about C&G sending posters here to spread their garbage.  I just did not want to name names because the people that are doing this know who they are.

Thank you for sharing some inside info with us.

 ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:23:31 PM

 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Shame, shame Kyle.  It was Shaefer who approached Tim Miller.

Interesting that it was Kyle himself requesting donations as late as Feb 8th.....


Yes, it is very interesting how all of this came about.  I have no problem with duel purpose searches but it has to be known up front that this is the deal.

I have only ever made donations to TES and I wonder if they actually gave money for this search.  I surely hope not.  Especially in light of the fact of the big loss on the Caylee effort.  And that is not over yet for Tim Miller. 

No wonder Tim Miller wants to retire!  Now he faces subpoena annoyances by the semi-lucid attorney for Casey Anthony.  I do hope Baez is required to pay any expenses Tim has to fly to Florida for all that mess.  He is just a man and can't possibly be expected to absorb unlimited expense just to operate this service.  In hard economic times, one of the first things to go are donations.

When I spoke with TES about donations, they WERE putting those earmarked "Natalee" for use in the ocean search, FWIW.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:24:04 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:25:02 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

Hello A1.Hope all is well.Being a member of any forum is fine by me as long as there goal is not to disrupt other forums,as well as potentially lie about the Mods and member's!The goal is and always was JUSTICE FOR NATALEE,as well as CAYLEE and all others who don't have a voice.The Monkey's will speak loud and clear!God Bless you A1. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 04:25:22 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET
I was banished.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 04:27:14 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

Hello A1.Hope all is well.Being a member of any forum is fine by me as long as there goal is not to disrupt other forums,as well as potentially lie about the Mods and member's!The goal is and always was JUSTICE FOR NATALEE,as well as CAYLEE and all others who don't have a voice.The Monkey's will speak loud and clear!God Bless you A1. ::MonkeyCool::
Thank you KTF.  I have been around for a long time, I just dont talk a lot here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 04:28:37 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!



Yes, but not surprising.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:28:51 PM

I was banished.
[/quote]

Did you get the unexplained axe that others got a couple of weeks ago?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 04:30:10 PM

 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Shame, shame Kyle.  It was Shaefer who approached Tim Miller.

Interesting that it was Kyle himself requesting donations as late as Feb 8th.....


Yes, it is very interesting how all of this came about.  I have no problem with duel purpose searches but it has to be known up front that this is the deal.

I have only ever made donations to TES and I wonder if they actually gave money for this search.  I surely hope not.  Especially in light of the fact of the big loss on the Caylee effort.  And that is not over yet for Tim Miller. 

No wonder Tim Miller wants to retire!  Now he faces subpoena annoyances by the semi-lucid attorney for Casey Anthony.  I do hope Baez is required to pay any expenses Tim has to fly to Florida for all that mess.  He is just a man and can't possibly be expected to absorb unlimited expense just to operate this service.  In hard economic times, one of the first things to go are donations.

When I spoke with TES about donations, they WERE putting those earmarked "Natalee" for use in the ocean search, FWIW.


Well, my little paultry donation was not enough to matter at all, a drop in the bucket but I am glad I did not specify for any one person.  I never do with TES because while I want justice for Natalee sooooo badly, there are horses and dogs to feed, etc. all the time and so I just never have been one to specify.  Also think it would make bookkeeping so much easier to be able to just put into a general fund.

But that is a shame if funds were actually accepted from TES and then this endeavor used for other things like selling films and making maps for use commercially.  Note I said IF as this hinges on the honesty of Kyle and what he said.

HUMAN REMAINS are the two words that are troubling to me right now.  Was this just OE's opinion or was it a fact?  And how do we know and further whose remains.

It's just very troubling.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:31:13 PM
KTF...Here are some more names and companies that were involved in the Persistence Search..And Look at the bottom who posted it

 Comment by Dihannah - Ohio
February 8th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Greta, maybe at least a quick mention of the following? Public service…..

For those interested in helping out with search, please read. Also, please see blog directly from the searchers. They are true heroes! They update almost daily of events during the search and provide videos. http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

Friday, February 8, 2008
XVII. Support the Effort

Special Notice:
The dedicated ocean search for Natalee Holloway has been underway since mid-November, 2007. What began in Louisiana during mobilization now culminating in Aruba, the search has utilized some of the best search equipment and personnel in the world. To date, approximately 900 miles of sonar data has been collected covering a geographic area 80% the size of Aruba. The search has required a painstakingly slow approach which in the end leaves no stone unturned.

Although slow, this approach is extremely effective in marine search and recovery. Since the beginning, the search has been privately funded by Louis Schaefer Jr. of Underwater Expeditions who remarkably and gracefully accepted the financial burden when requested by Texas Equusearch and Natalee’s parents. John Silvetti of Marine Surveys, Greg Landry of Offshore Innovative Solutions, Erik McGuire of Seatronics, along with Agiosat and Wilkens Weather Service came beside Louis to conduct this humanitarian effort. To put this search effort in financial perspective, an equivalent search conducted for industry would involve costs well exceeding several million dollars. This project has been conducted for about 35 cents on the dollar, with costs still exceeding a million dollars.

Although we have searched and ruled out an extensive portion of the original planned search area, a substantial portion of the high-probability area yet remains to be explored. Now, following a publicly confirmed admission that Natalee Holloway was disposed at sea, we are confident that completing the focused search area will bring closure. We therefore formally invite and request anyone who this humanitarian effort has touched to get involved and to help support the remaining search efforts. Donations are being handled by Texas Equusearch, a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization. Please come beside those who have already given so much to help ensure a proper funeral in Alabama for Natalee Holloway. Please make all donations marked as: “Holloway search”.

To learn more about Texas Equusearch and to help support the search for Natalee Holloway, check out: http://www.texasequusearch.org/donate.html

Texas EquuSearch Office:
4013 FM 517, Suite B
Dickinson, Texas 77539
P. O. Box 395, Dickinson, Texas 77539

Office: (281) 309-9500
Fax: (281) 534-6719
Toll Free: (877) 270-9500
Email: donate@texasequusearch.org

Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:44 PM

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/02/08/friday-night-gretalivewire-tune-in-4/all-comments/


 ::MonkeyShocked::

Thank you hotping.

As Beth Holloway would said ... "Greta ... this is huge!"

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking ... and Tim states to Jamie Colby of FOX that Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway while Tim Miller was at his home.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »


The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world. The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after. It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found herI don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg625934#msg625934

They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 04:31:16 PM

Did you get the unexplained axe that others got a couple of weeks ago?
[/quote]Not exactly, I apparently broke an unpublished rule......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:33:08 PM

Did you get the unexplained axe that others got a couple of weeks ago?
Not exactly, I apparently broke an unpublished rule......
[/quote]

well hey!  at least you got an explanation!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:33:22 PM

Did you get the unexplained axe that others got a couple of weeks ago?
Not exactly, I apparently broke an unpublished rule......
[/quote]

Sounds like CnG is following the Law of Aruba!Just sayin..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 04:33:53 PM
KTF ya know what i honestly thought every time i saw one of them up in the rafters and drop down like pigeons once in awhile to drop a load on a car?? remember the old romper room show? the lady would look thru her magic mirror..and say " I see so billy, I see tommy...Oh and Looky who else i see.." lmao thats all that would got thru my head at times lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:33:56 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:34:29 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET
I was banished.

A1 ... I meant why were you a member of a forum the bashed Scared Monkeys ... bashed Klaas ... bashed those that were attempting to expose the truth ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... encompassing John Silvetti's betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

Why did you have to be banned prior to leaving?

A1 ... you know I love ya.  I just do not understand.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 04:35:20 PM
KTF ya know what i honestly thought every time i saw one of them up in the rafters and drop down like pigeons once in awhile to drop a load on a car?? remember the old romper room show? the lady would look thru her magic mirror..and say " I see so billy, I see tommy...Oh and Looky who else i see.." lmao thats all that would got thru my head at times lol

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 04:36:02 PM
O/T sortof   ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.nypost.com/seven/01292009/news/regionalnews/manhattan/city_to_get_dutch_treat_152558.htm

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dutch1.jpg)

And the comment   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dutch2.jpg)

A couple more comments, lol     ::MonkeyHaHa::


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/SIguido2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:39:47 PM

Did you get the unexplained axe that others got a couple of weeks ago?
Not exactly, I apparently broke an unpublished rule......

Sounds like CnG is following the Law of Aruba!Just sayin..
[/quote]

THAT is what this all reminded me of, thank you!!!

I'm sure many will remember well the early days on these message boards when Arubanesque types were trying to hunt down the personal information of the diligent folks trying to ferret out the truth.

They would find out something about a poster, and attempt to threaten, intimidate and harass them.

Geez - how must the cng gang feel to realize they have now turned into what the original  CTV Refugees were!! 

They must be proud!

A dear friend mentioned to me not long ago that cng is the new Dark Side.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 04:40:45 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET
I was banished.

A1 ... I meant why were you a member of a forum the bashed Scared Monkeys ... bashed Klaas ... bashed those that were attempting to expose the truth ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... encompassing John Silvetti's betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

Why did you have to be banned prior to leaving?

A1 ... you know I love ya.  I just do not understand.

Janet
Gosh Janet, I dont know how to answer that.  That's why I havent said anything.  I truly thought the people who invited me there cared about me, I had talked to them on the phone, been invited to their homes.....Im sorry, I dont know how to answer that.  I love children, I want them found and brought home.  Thats why Im here, that's why I was there......that's the only answer I can give you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:42:08 PM
 ::MonkeyLaugh::  Thanks Klaas!

Could someone please whisper into Medley's ear to put a cork in it?

She's doing herself no favors.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:45:00 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET
I was banished.

A1 ... I meant why were you a member of a forum the bashed Scared Monkeys ... bashed Klaas ... bashed those that were attempting to expose the truth ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... encompassing John Silvetti's betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

Why did you have to be banned prior to leaving?

A1 ... you know I love ya.  I just do not understand.

Janet
Gosh Janet, I dont know how to answer that.  That's why I havent said anything.  I truly thought the people who invited me there cared about me, I had talked to them on the phone, been invited to their homes.....Im sorry, I dont know how to answer that.  I love children, I want them found and brought home.  Thats why Im here, that's why I was there......that's the only answer I can give you.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 04:45:32 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET
I was banished.

Jealously over her size 4 jeans    ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 04:46:36 PM
::MonkeyLaugh::  Thanks Klaas!

Could someone please whisper into Medley's ear to put a cork in it?

She's doing herself no favors.

She's a fool


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 04:52:52 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 04:56:10 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 29, 2009, 04:56:58 PM
I was the one whose comment made Seamonkey laugh in my attempt to defuse the impending argument that would have ensued from comments made by SS the other day and in which I made no reference to CnG – only to a hidey hole.  Now many forums have hidey holes or members only areas for the posting of more personal type discussions that their members do not wish the entire world to read.

I also was a member of CnG and invited at the time of their initial setting up by the same friend as some others have stated this morning.  I was never permitted to their Secret Hidey Hole where most of the monkeys missing or banned from these pages now gather.  I was only permitted to read in their front forum along with quite a few others and I now believe we were all there just as a front to make it appear to be a normal forum while the more exalted members hid behind the scenes to discuss whatever.  I did find it easy to read there in a short time particularly the Caylee thread as there were no O/T or nonsense posts permitted – in fact most of the posts were only copied from other sites or links to the media. The number of those who were confined to the front forum has been whittled down over the past few weeks, sometimes as mass deletions, which from reports posted in other forums seem to stem from activities in their chat room.  I had never entered their chat room so have no first hand knowledge of any discussions that took place there.

However I went to read at their forum a short time after making that remark only to find it had already been copied to their “Look what was just posted at SM” thread and the leader of their HH group deemed it rude and ignorant.  I then had to leave the site owing to family matters and when I returned later planning to ask why they were so paranoid as to think everything posted anywhere else always alluded to them and to tell them I could no longer be associated with such a one sided forum and hate SM site as they have become increasingly open about, I found I was no longer able to gain access.

This amused me greatly and as the forum owner boasts they do not ban anyone – they just delete them - I guess I have been deleted.  I suppose my one and only post there wishing members Merry Christmas will no longer show my nic but just "deleted member". ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 04:57:43 PM
You all have never showed anything but kindness...so Your welcome if i was able to shed any light on anything..

and yes..the focus..Justice for Natalee...and honoring her memory in a mature, honest , and heartfelt way...

You must find it quite telling to see fellow members sit up in the rafters here at scared monkey's and watch what transpires and act like they aren't memebers at CnG!


Hello, I sit in the rafters, normally, and was a C and G member, but now Im not.

WHY????

 ::MonkeyWaa::

jANET
I was banished.

Jealously over her size 4 jeans    ::MonkeyHaHa::

Klaas ... it was not just jealousy over the Lucky brand jeans ... it was A1's black silk Philip Lim blouse and boots.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 04:58:35 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 05:06:30 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 29, 2009, 05:10:18 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


KYcat - just to clarify - the front forum appeared somewhat normal for a long time.  It has only been in the past few weeks, probably coinciding with the nasty drive by posts they have been making, that the hatred of SM spilled out into the front forum and it became increasingly obvious that all members had to toe their line or be deleted.  Of course it was never clearly stated to anyone - in fact in my case it was denied more than once - that they were gathered there solely to discredit SM and Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 29, 2009, 05:11:35 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO
You dont offend me KY Cat.  I am just a very trusting person.  You have to run over me, stab me with a knife, poison me, hang me, drown me before I decide you might not care for me........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:12:58 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

I am not a good team player but ... I am willing to share my research on the Natalee Holloway case upon request.  Jen's qualifications as administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds ... overseeing all the documents .. would make her an excellent candidate for a leader.  Then there is Klaas ... with all her free time outside of the 24 hours a day overseeing the SM site ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 05:14:06 PM
 :smt039 :pig: :smt039  :mrgreen:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 29, 2009, 05:16:02 PM
:smt039 :pig: :smt039  :mrgreen:

 ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Hya, Seamonkey!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:18:05 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO
You dont offend me KY Cat.  I am just a very trusting person.  You have to run over me, stab me with a knife, poison me, hang me, drown me before I decide you might not care for me........

A1 ... ask yourself the question ... "Do I like the words and actions of others".  If the answer is no ... step back and make choices.  Trust God to bring the right people in your life but ... you have to do your part.  BE DISCERNING!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 05:19:13 PM
:smt039 :pig: :smt039  :mrgreen:

 ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Hya, Seamonkey!

Hiya colley lmaoo, oh ya see "tommy".. I see "alice", i see...

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/funny053.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 05:25:37 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 05:30:16 PM
:smt039 :pig: :smt039  :mrgreen:

 ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Hya, Seamonkey!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/vinkko.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:35:11 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 05:39:52 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet

 ::MonkeyCool:: I rarely get accused of being a "conformist" or "adherent"!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 05:40:14 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

No wreck, probably not, the ones that lasted that were not part of the secret underbelly, i believe had to adopt a bobble-head atitiude of just smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding. Because the minute ya said ANYTHING against what the foundation of that place was made on you were POOF! history..Least thats what it seems like to me rather clearly.

So future cnger's,  take note..buy a bobble head and study it night and day, There will be a test...and dont think they wont be watching your every move. and i mean EVERY move.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:40:55 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet

 ::MonkeyCool:: I rarely get accused of being a "conformist" or "adherent"!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll::

Wreck ... I recognize a kindred spirit.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:42:45 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

No wreck, probably not, the ones that lasted that were not part of the secret underbelly, i believe had to adopt a bobble-head atitiude of just smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding. Because the minute ya said ANYTHING against what the foundation of that place was made on you were POOF! history..Least thats what it seems like to me rather clearly.

So future cnger's,  take note..buy a bobble head and study it night and day, There will be a test...and dont think they wont be watching your every move. and i mean EVERY move.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 05:43:31 PM
:smt039 :pig: :smt039  :mrgreen:

 ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Hya, Seamonkey!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/vinkko.gif)

lol  :cyclops:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 05:44:22 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet

 ::MonkeyCool:: I rarely get accused of being a "conformist" or "adherent"!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll::

Wreck ... I recognize a kindred spirit.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

I was a kindred spirit till i came out of the closet! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:46:58 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

... and the understanding was that Kyle Kingsman would first share the document with Beth Holloway and the FBI.

Do I have that right jen?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 05:47:37 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:49:50 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet

 ::MonkeyCool:: I rarely get accused of being a "conformist" or "adherent"!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll::

Wreck ... I recognize a kindred spirit.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

I was a kindred spirit till i came out of the closet! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Boy Monkey?  Girl Monkey?  It makes no difference Keepthefaith.  Justice for Natalee Holloway is where it is at and ... you are a kindred spirit through and through.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 05:50:48 PM
Well, I have posted at Refugees under another name.  Didn't take them long to "out" me and they felt so clever doing so even though I made little attempt to conceal my real identity.

However, I was there posting to counter some of their more outrageous lies especially about Beth and to show support for the outnumbered posters who do support Justice for Natalee.  They can be very, very nasty and the admin admits that new posters are kept on a "shorter leash" than the older ones who can do just about anything.

I just felt so badly for those standing up for what was right seeing them take a bashing every post they made.  I also saw it as possibly an opportunity to recruit more who were crossing over sides with the confession of Joran on TV.

It was quite an experience but I grew weary of the negativity being aimed at me and others.  And the irrational persistence with wild theories that "logic dictates" could not possibly be true.  As far as I know,I can still post there, just haven't in several months, no time and the attacks get old after a while.

But even that Dark Side will allow dissenting opinions as long as expressed appropriately.   This does not seem to be the case with CnG.
And I am sure my invitation just got lost in the mail as I know several there are very fond of me, hahahhahahaha!

In the case of Chat n Grumble, I think I could guess what they want to grumble about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 05:50:51 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 05:51:13 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet

 ::MonkeyCool:: I rarely get accused of being a "conformist" or "adherent"!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll::

Wreck ... I recognize a kindred spirit.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

I was a kindred spirit till i came out of the closet! ::MonkeyLaugh::
Is that when you became a male monkey?  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 05:52:27 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

No wreck, probably not, the ones that lasted that were not part of the secret underbelly, i believe had to adopt a bobble-head atitiude of just smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding. Because the minute ya said ANYTHING against what the foundation of that place was made on you were POOF! history..Least thats what it seems like to me rather clearly.

So future cnger's,  take note..buy a bobble head and study it night and day, There will be a test...and dont think they wont be watching your every move. and i mean EVERY move.


 ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I guess they didnt take my signature there as me meaning it lol

"I will choose the path that's clear. I will choose free will."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 05:53:58 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 05:56:07 PM
klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:


Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 05:56:45 PM
For the record, I too was invited, but never went there. (I don't think I would have lasted very long anyways!)  ::MonkeyCool::

Wreck ... I know you and ... I suspect that you would bailed from CnG in a very short time.  What SeaMonkey and A1 has shared ... CnG is the definition of a cult and ... the requirement of a cult is comformity and adherence.

Janet

 ::MonkeyCool:: I rarely get accused of being a "conformist" or "adherent"!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll::

Wreck ... I recognize a kindred spirit.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

I was a kindred spirit till i came out of the closet! ::MonkeyLaugh::
Is that when you became a male monkey?  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyRoll::

That would be correct Wreck.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 29, 2009, 05:57:56 PM
Thank you, Tib.  I do understand better now. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 05:58:18 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.

What made them want to stay behind?Any ideas or speculation as to why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 05:59:21 PM


Wreck ... I recognize a kindred spirit.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

I was a kindred spirit till i came out of the closet! ::MonkeyLaugh::
[/quote]

Boy Monkey?  Girl Monkey?  It makes no difference Keepthefaith.  Justice for Natalee Holloway is where it is at and ... you are a kindred spirit through and through.

Thank you.

Janet
[/quote]

Has anyone else noted that now Janet tells KTF "thank you" instead of giving him a hug?

Just saying. . . . . .  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 06:01:08 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.

What made them want to stay behind?Any ideas or speculation as to why?

John and Kyle did not leave the Island around the same time that the Persistence sailed away?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link/source please.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 29, 2009, 06:01:12 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


KYcat - just to clarify - the front forum appeared somewhat normal for a long time.  It has only been in the past few weeks, probably coinciding with the nasty drive by posts they have been making, that the hatred of SM spilled out into the front forum and it became increasingly obvious that all members had to toe their line or be deleted.  Of course it was never clearly stated to anyone - in fact in my case it was denied more than once - that they were gathered there solely to discredit SM and Klaas.

I don't have inside information or fully understand how all this happened, but I just had to say that the concept of a site existing for the sole purpose of discrediting Scared Monkeys and the selfless hours put in by Klaas, is a pretty damning commentary about the participants there.

I'll hold up the objectives of this forum and particularly this thread to the light of day, anytime, anywhere, and to anyone.

We stand with the girl, and her family. We stand against the corruption and evil that both brought her life to an end, and have been at work to obscure the truth regarding it. It's ALL about Natalee!

I want no part of any entity that has formed against those principles at Scared Monkeys.

One is based in compassion, and the other is based in contempt. I know which is stronger, and I'm honored to stand with you all in that place of strength.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 06:01:24 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Is it even still possible to make a formal compilation with the threat of  legal action?  What did the Freebird attorney say about this?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 06:04:13 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:05:56 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


KYcat - just to clarify - the front forum appeared somewhat normal for a long time.  It has only been in the past few weeks, probably coinciding with the nasty drive by posts they have been making, that the hatred of SM spilled out into the front forum and it became increasingly obvious that all members had to toe their line or be deleted.  Of course it was never clearly stated to anyone - in fact in my case it was denied more than once - that they were gathered there solely to discredit SM and Klaas.

I don't have inside information or fully understand how all this happened, but I just had to say that the concept of a site existing for the sole purpose of discrediting Scared Monkeys and the selfless hours put in by Klaas, is a pretty damning commentary about the participants there.

I'll hold up the objectives of this forum and particularly this thread to the light of day, anytime, anywhere, and to anyone.

We stand with the girl, and her family. We stand against the corruption and evil that both brought her life to an end, and have been at work to obscure the truth regarding it. It's ALL about Natalee!

I want no part of any entity that has formed against those principles at Scared Monkeys.

One is based in compassion, and the other is based in contempt. I know which is stronger, and I'm honored to stand with you all in that place of strength.

I'll stand by Scared Monkey's,The Monkey'sin the cage and it's Mod's against any other site Period.Allowing KTF to go crazy in the cage one night when no one else was here sealed the deal.Klaas did have the premonition that KTF was gettin a little uncivil by HIS self and proceeded to catch me red-handed. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:07:37 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.

I may be being petty but one would think.You go as a team and you return as a team unless of an Emergency!JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 06:08:59 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Is it even still possible to make a formal compilation with the threat of  legal action?  What did the Freebird attorney say about this?



I don't see how it could be an issue.  Kyle has no binding agreement of privacy with SM.  Jen didn't come here and suggest we become Freebirds.  I asked a former Frebird what we could do to keep their spirit alive.  Kyle's posts have already been outted.

Jen, would you be interested in being our fearless leader, becuase I think Klass has a full plate being our herder.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 06:09:46 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.

What made them want to stay behind?Any ideas or speculation as to why?

John and Kyle did not leave the Island around the same time that the Persistence sailed away?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link/source please.

Janet

I can probably find a link for Kyle, I think he told us here that he was taking a flight home.  John...well you probably won't like that source.   ::MonkeyWink::  I'll see what I can find.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 06:10:54 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.

I may be being petty but one would think.You go as a team and you return as a team unless of an Emergency!JMOO

IIRC correctly Kyle flew in to Aruba to join the Persistence originally.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 06:11:01 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.

I may be being petty but one would think.You go as a team and you return as a team unless of an Emergency!JMOO


Well, he did have a wife at home expecting their first child.  And he had stayed much longer than the original two weeks that was stated as the length of the search originally.  That would be sort of an emergency, IMO.

But don't know what anyone else did.  I don't recall if Kyle said others flew home or not.

Janet, I never have archives, links and things that you do.  But I do have a pretty good memory for details.  Granny Toad always did as well and Klaas is not bad herself.  We just lack your organizational skills.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:14:03 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.

I may be being petty but one would think.You go as a team and you return as a team unless of an Emergency!JMOO


Well, he did have a wife at home expecting their first child.  And he had stayed much longer than the original two weeks that was stated as the length of the search originally.  That would be sort of an emergency, IMO.
But don't know what anyone else did.  I don't recall if Kyle said others flew home or not.

Janet, I never have archives, links and things that you do.  But I do have a pretty good memory for details.  Granny Toad always did as well and Klaas is not bad herself.  We just lack your organizational skills.

.

No problems with that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 06:15:32 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Is it even still possible to make a formal compilation with the threat of  legal action?  What did the Freebird attorney say about this?



I don't see how it could be an issue.  Kyle has no binding agreement of privacy with SM.  Jen didn't come here and suggest we become Freebirds.  I asked a former Frebird what we could do to keep their spirit alive.  Kyle's posts have already been outted.

Jen, would you be interested in being our fearless leader, becuase I think Klass has a full plate being our herder.

Thanks Ree.  Better safe than sorry.

Another question.  The person who was against outing Kyle at Freebirds---are they now at CnG's famous site?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 06:16:36 PM
Sorry for the O/T, but Blue Moon is everythink OK in your neck of the woods?  Hotels here are full and cold weather supplies are selling out due to the KY residents coming across the TN border for supplies and heat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 06:17:18 PM
So I have just caught up.  Another interesting day.

Let me get this straight, Janet is a "boy" monkey and Kermit is a "boy" monkey.  Is this correct?  It doesn't matter either way but I AM SO confused now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:17:34 PM
I think a lot to this is Following Schaeffer and the money,UnderwaterExpeditions and Trahan,Silvetti and those GeoLab companies,as well as where Kyle is working?I truly believe if we can pinpoint that as well as some of the business relationships it will come together.How to do that is the question.I think you have to let those Traitors continue to play there hands in terms of looking for the big payday of OIL contracts.It will happen!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 06:18:30 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Is it even still possible to make a formal compilation with the threat of  legal action?  What did the Freebird attorney say about this?



I don't see how it could be an issue.  Kyle has no binding agreement of privacy with SM.  Jen didn't come here and suggest we become Freebirds.  I asked a former Frebird what we could do to keep their spirit alive.  Kyle's posts have already been outted.

Jen, would you be interested in being our fearless leader, becuase I think Klass has a full plate being our herder.
I think Klaas' official title is "Monkey Wrangler"!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:19:43 PM
So I have just caught up.  Another interesting day.

Let me get this straight, Janet is a "boy" monkey and Kermit is a "boy" monkey.  Is this correct?  It doesn't matter either way but I AM SO confused now.

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyLaugh::.Just Kidding Janet!Blue Moon.KTF is the Boy Monkey and is never afforded another Hug! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 06:21:12 PM
Sorry for the O/T, but Blue Moon is everythink OK in your neck of the woods?  Hotels here are full and cold weather supplies are selling out due to the KY residents coming across the TN border for supplies and heat.

No, my county is recovering but the counties just to the north of me are in terrible shape.  They are not expecting power back on for at least 14 days.  Hotels are fine here but they are starting to fill up so people have no other choice but to go south across the line into TN. is their only option.  They have declared those counties in a start of emergency and money has been offered to those counties today so everyone is going out to buy generators cause the disaster money will pay for it.  They are bringing in power crews that worked the hurricanes to help put up power lines.  It looks like a disaster area. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 06:21:56 PM
So I have just caught up.  Another interesting day.

Let me get this straight, Janet is a "boy" monkey and Kermit is a "boy" monkey.  Is this correct?  It doesn't matter either way but I AM SO confused now.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Blue Moon ... I won't speak for Kermit but ... Janet is a girl monkey and ... that is the truth.

Janet

+++++



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 06:23:39 PM
So I have just caught up.  Another interesting day.

Let me get this straight, Janet is a "boy" monkey and Kermit is a "boy" monkey.  Is this correct?  It doesn't matter either way but I AM SO confused now.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Blue Moon ... I won't speak for Kermit but ... Janet is a girl monkey and ... that is the truth.

Janet

+++++



Well I should hope so.  That wig gave you away.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 06:25:32 PM
I think a lot to this is Following Schaeffer and the money,UnderwaterExpeditions and Trahan,Silvetti and those GeoLab companies,as well as where Kyle is working?I truly believe if we can pinpoint that as well as some of the business relationships it will come together.How to do that is the question.I think you have to let those Traitors continue to play there hands in terms of looking for the big payday of OIL contracts.It will happen!

My opinion:
I think Kyle entered with a honest heart. I think he got a little side tracked, but still thought he was "on the good side". It wasn't until about late Spring - early Summer when his financial responsibilities started to rely back on those he is "protecting" now. It's sad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 06:26:21 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

I am not a good team player but ... I am willing to share my research on the Natalee Holloway case upon request.  Jen's qualifications as administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds ... overseeing all the documents .. would make her an excellent candidate for a leader.  Then there is Klaas ... with all her free time outside of the 24 hours a day overseeing the SM site ...

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 06:26:55 PM
I think a lot to this is Following Schaeffer and the money,UnderwaterExpeditions and Trahan,Silvetti and those GeoLab companies,as well as where Kyle is working?I truly believe if we can pinpoint that as well as some of the business relationships it will come together.How to do that is the question.I think you have to let those Traitors continue to play there hands in terms of looking for the big payday of OIL contracts.It will happen!

My opinion:
I think Kyle entered with a honest heart. I think he got a little side tracked, but still thought he was "on the good side". It wasn't until about late Spring - early Summer when his financial responsibilities started to rely back on those he is "protecting" now. It's sad.

I think you hit the nail right on the head, myself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:30:31 PM
I think a lot to this is Following Schaeffer and the money,UnderwaterExpeditions and Trahan,Silvetti and those GeoLab companies,as well as where Kyle is working?I truly believe if we can pinpoint that as well as some of the business relationships it will come together.How to do that is the question.I think you have to let those Traitors continue to play there hands in terms of looking for the big payday of OIL contracts.It will happen!

My opinion:
I think Kyle entered with a honest heart. I think he got a little side tracked, but still thought he was "on the good side". It wasn't until about late Spring - early Summer when his financial responsibilities started to rely back on those he is "protecting" now. It's sad.

I agree Wreck.I think Kyle was,and has had ample time to bring forth what transpired and he failed to do that.Right is right and wrong is wrong.I don't envy his position whatsoever!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 06:31:06 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.

What made them want to stay behind?Any ideas or speculation as to why?

John and Kyle did not leave the Island around the same time that the Persistence sailed away?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link/source please.

Janet

I can probably find a link for Kyle, I think he told us here that he was taking a flight home.  John...well you probably won't like that source.   ::MonkeyWink::  I'll see what I can find.



Janet, OE's post about "flying out" can be found here.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=120

According to his post some were "flying out" on March 2nd, and the Persistence was leaving on March 2nd.

Kermit posted an email about the "meeting" that was on March 3rd.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:33:59 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.

What made them want to stay behind?Any ideas or speculation as to why?

John and Kyle did not leave the Island around the same time that the Persistence sailed away?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link/source please.

Janet

I can probably find a link for Kyle, I think he told us here that he was taking a flight home.  John...well you probably won't like that source.   ::MonkeyWink::  I'll see what I can find.



Janet, OE's post about "flying out" can be found here.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=120

According to his post some were "flying out" on March 2nd, and the Persistence was leaving on March 2nd.

Kermit posted an email about the "meeting" that was on March 3rd.  

Was this the meeting with Caps,Clyde,Helen,John?Was it a spur of the moment thing,and or a planned meeting?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 29, 2009, 06:39:48 PM
Klass, I have to leave early this evening and not sure if I'll be back today.  You can provide my email to Jen if she takes us up on our offer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 29, 2009, 06:41:22 PM
Keepthefaith is a boy monkey?  Well hells bells.  How did I miss that.  Howdy monkeys.  Yes I'm way way behind.  And by time I catch ya'll be gone to bed.  Haha. 

Howdy snoopy!  Yes KTF shocked some of us, but not Magnolia...she had him figured out!  ::MonkeyWink::

Nothing gets past our sweet Magnolia.  Nothing.

Howdy ya'll.  And yes I'm way behind again.  lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 06:42:03 PM
I think a lot to this is Following Schaeffer and the money,UnderwaterExpeditions and Trahan,Silvetti and those GeoLab companies,as well as where Kyle is working?I truly believe if we can pinpoint that as well as some of the business relationships it will come together.How to do that is the question.I think you have to let those Traitors continue to play there hands in terms of looking for the big payday of OIL contracts.It will happen!

My opinion:
I think Kyle entered with a honest heart. I think he got a little side tracked, but still thought he was "on the good side". It wasn't until about late Spring - early Summer when his financial responsibilities started to rely back on those he is "protecting" now. It's sad.

Yes, we all looked forward so to his posts.  He does have a flair for writing, almost lyrical.  And we were so grateful for anyone doing anything to help this family.  All the other stuff I didn't even notice until Private Eye posted that and even then didn't understand what I was reading.

I am sorry this happened because Kyle is very young.  He may have been caught talking about his boss in a way he quickly came to regret.  We have all done that at one time or another, just never, ever put it in writing, lol!

They already have worked for Dutch corps so did that come about as a result of their mapping?  Would be hard to say or know as it is a very small and esoteric line of work.  But for sure, they will be encountering Dutch oil companies throughout the world and for a very long time.

Guess it's not a smart thing to do to be dissing the potential client.  Also about that donation from AHATA, now I wonder how much exactly that would involve?  Was it in exchange for anything?  Like maybe allowing only ALE to have access to the contents of the trap?

So many questions, no way to answer them.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 06:42:34 PM
Has Greta said ANYTHING about Natalee since the week she was supposedly going there?? Did she completely abandon the "sold into slavery" angle? She went from 100mph to 0 overnight!  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 29, 2009, 06:43:21 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


KYcat - just to clarify - the front forum appeared somewhat normal for a long time.  It has only been in the past few weeks, probably coinciding with the nasty drive by posts they have been making, that the hatred of SM spilled out into the front forum and it became increasingly obvious that all members had to toe their line or be deleted.  Of course it was never clearly stated to anyone - in fact in my case it was denied more than once - that they were gathered there solely to discredit SM and Klaas.

I don't have inside information or fully understand how all this happened, but I just had to say that the concept of a site existing for the sole purpose of discrediting Scared Monkeys and the selfless hours put in by Klaas, is a pretty damning commentary about the participants there.

I'll hold up the objectives of this forum and particularly this thread to the light of day, anytime, anywhere, and to anyone.

We stand with the girl, and her family. We stand against the corruption and evil that both brought her life to an end, and have been at work to obscure the truth regarding it. It's ALL about Natalee!

I want no part of any entity that has formed against those principles at Scared Monkeys.

One is based in compassion, and the other is based in contempt. I know which is stronger, and I'm honored to stand with you all in that place of strength.


CBB the original invitation that we received from someone we had considered a friend of SM and ourselves stated that it was to be a forum investigating and supporting Natalee's case, with additonal contacts giving more information.  Janet's comment that it resembled a cult is the most accurate description.

Because the forum owner left another site after being unable to gain access to their particular hidey hole it was stated more than once that this owner would not allow any hidden areas on her forum.  All members would have access to all areas.  Those of us that joined at our friend's invitation did so to support her in her new venture rather than the forum.  Everything changed after another ex-monkey demanded and was given complete control of a hidey hole and who would be permitted to access it. After a while it became obvious to most of us that there had to be a secret area as the post count for a lot of the members grew at an amazing rate when they posted very little in the front forum.  I questioned our friend several times about this and she always denied any other area.  Since then this friend has become so different in her attitude to many of us and all I can assume is that she has decided to follow the herd rather than lose her status as a co-owner of a forum.

It is also distressing to me to see so many people I did consider to be internet friends be swayed by a small group of trouble makers who have upset more than one forum in the recent past.  A lot of you would be shocked at who are members there (Janet would need a tablet and a lie-down) and which of those work behind the scenes instigating the nasty posts that their flunkies carry over here and post on their behalf. 

I am proud to no longer be associated with any of them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 06:49:10 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

... and the understanding was that Kyle Kingsman would first share the document with Beth Holloway and the FBI.

Do I have that right jen?

Janet

Close.  The understanding was that Kyle had ALREADY shared this with Beth and the FBI.  Which turned out not to be the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:49:47 PM
Has Greta said ANYTHING about Natalee since the week she was supposedly going there?? Did she completely abandon the "sold into slavery" angle? She went from 100mph to 0 overnight!  ::MonkeyConfused::

I've wondered that for some time now.I went flyin out the front window the stop was so abrupt. ::MonkeyHaHa:: Still pondering those Tj Ward tapes,Antonio Carlo & Paulus,as well as The Mansur's..What and when did they know it is my question.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 06:50:19 PM
Klass, I have to leave early this evening and not sure if I'll be back today.  You can provide my email to Jen if she takes us up on our offer.

Sure Ree


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 06:51:23 PM
Has Greta said ANYTHING about Natalee since the week she was supposedly going there?? Did she completely abandon the "sold into slavery" angle? She went from 100mph to 0 overnight!  ::MonkeyConfused::

Yep and what happened to JQK meeting with Brinkman and MOS the first part of January? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 06:52:01 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


KYcat - just to clarify - the front forum appeared somewhat normal for a long time.  It has only been in the past few weeks, probably coinciding with the nasty drive by posts they have been making, that the hatred of SM spilled out into the front forum and it became increasingly obvious that all members had to toe their line or be deleted.  Of course it was never clearly stated to anyone - in fact in my case it was denied more than once - that they were gathered there solely to discredit SM and Klaas.

I don't have inside information or fully understand how all this happened, but I just had to say that the concept of a site existing for the sole purpose of discrediting Scared Monkeys and the selfless hours put in by Klaas, is a pretty damning commentary about the participants there.

I'll hold up the objectives of this forum and particularly this thread to the light of day, anytime, anywhere, and to anyone.

We stand with the girl, and her family. We stand against the corruption and evil that both brought her life to an end, and have been at work to obscure the truth regarding it. It's ALL about Natalee!

I want no part of any entity that has formed against those principles at Scared Monkeys.

One is based in compassion, and the other is based in contempt. I know which is stronger, and I'm honored to stand with you all in that place of strength.


CBB the original invitation that we received from someone we had considered a friend of SM and ourselves stated that it was to be a forum investigating and supporting Natalee's case, with additonal contacts giving more information.  Janet's comment that it resembled a cult is the most accurate description.

Because the forum owner left another site after being unable to gain access to their particular hidey hole it was stated more than once that this owner would not allow any hidden areas on her forum.  All members would have access to all areas.  Those of us that joined at our friend's invitation did so to support her in her new venture rather than the forum.  Everything changed after another ex-monkey demanded and was given complete control of a hidey hole and who would be permitted to access it. After a while it became obvious to most of us that there had to be a secret area as the post count for a lot of the members grew at an amazing rate when they posted very little in the front forum.  I questioned our friend several times about this and she always denied any other area.  Since then this friend has become so different in her attitude to many of us and all I can assume is that she has decided to follow the herd rather than lose her status as a co-owner of a forum.

It is also distressing to me to see so many people I did consider to be internet friends be swayed by a small group of trouble makers who have upset more than one forum in the recent past.  A lot of you would be shocked at who are members there (Janet would need a tablet and a lie-down) and which of those work behind the scenes instigating the nasty posts that their flunkies carry over here and post on their behalf. 

I am proud to no longer be associated with any of them.


 :smt041 Hiya tib, so true all of it.. :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 06:54:19 PM
Has Greta said ANYTHING about Natalee since the week she was supposedly going there?? Did she completely abandon the "sold into slavery" angle? She went from 100mph to 0 overnight!  ::MonkeyConfused::

Yep and what happened to JQK meeting with Brinkman and MOS the first part of January? 

Kermit said that Brinkman didn't leave empty-handed!FWIW


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 29, 2009, 06:54:28 PM
A-1, I hope I don't offend you but I agree with Janet.  I don't understand how anyone can be a member at C&G which bashes SM, Klaas, and other monkeys and then come here and post.  In other words, for me at least, I could not be a member at both places becuase I could not stand by and condone the bashing of SM.

MOO


KYcat - just to clarify - the front forum appeared somewhat normal for a long time.  It has only been in the past few weeks, probably coinciding with the nasty drive by posts they have been making, that the hatred of SM spilled out into the front forum and it became increasingly obvious that all members had to toe their line or be deleted.  Of course it was never clearly stated to anyone - in fact in my case it was denied more than once - that they were gathered there solely to discredit SM and Klaas.

I don't have inside information or fully understand how all this happened, but I just had to say that the concept of a site existing for the sole purpose of discrediting Scared Monkeys and the selfless hours put in by Klaas, is a pretty damning commentary about the participants there.

I'll hold up the objectives of this forum and particularly this thread to the light of day, anytime, anywhere, and to anyone.

We stand with the girl, and her family. We stand against the corruption and evil that both brought her life to an end, and have been at work to obscure the truth regarding it. It's ALL about Natalee!

I want no part of any entity that has formed against those principles at Scared Monkeys.

One is based in compassion, and the other is based in contempt. I know which is stronger, and I'm honored to stand with you all in that place of strength.


CBB the original invitation that we received from someone we had considered a friend of SM and ourselves stated that it was to be a forum investigating and supporting Natalee's case, with additonal contacts giving more information.  Janet's comment that it resembled a cult is the most accurate description.

Because the forum owner left another site after being unable to gain access to their particular hidey hole it was stated more than once that this owner would not allow any hidden areas on her forum.  All members would have access to all areas.  Those of us that joined at our friend's invitation did so to support her in her new venture rather than the forum.  Everything changed after another ex-monkey demanded and was given complete control of a hidey hole and who would be permitted to access it. After a while it became obvious to most of us that there had to be a secret area as the post count for a lot of the members grew at an amazing rate when they posted very little in the front forum.  I questioned our friend several times about this and she always denied any other area.  Since then this friend has become so different in her attitude to many of us and all I can assume is that she has decided to follow the herd rather than lose her status as a co-owner of a forum.

It is also distressing to me to see so many people I did consider to be internet friends be swayed by a small group of trouble makers who have upset more than one forum in the recent past.  A lot of you would be shocked at who are members there (Janet would need a tablet and a lie-down) and which of those work behind the scenes instigating the nasty posts that their flunkies carry over here and post on their behalf. 

I am proud to no longer be associated with any of them.


Tib

And those flunkies don't realize those sending them here don't even like them..Remember???????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 06:54:56 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Is it even still possible to make a formal compilation with the threat of  legal action?  What did the Freebird attorney say about this?



This is a good question.  I would have to defer to the Owner(s) of this site to make a judgement call regarding what, if anything, SM wants to do with it.

Freebirds would have prevailed in any civil litigation brought forth, but the expense of litigating was the problem.

Our TOS read similar to those here, and it was mostly our TOS that would have put us in the position to prevail.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 06:56:26 PM
Yes os, lol and wonder what they will think now ???  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 06:58:59 PM
So, Freebirds are no more.  Monkey's can act like birds.  What can we do as a group to do something like the Freebirds would have done?  I can volunteer some time, if somebody wants to be the leader.

Well let me tell you what the Freebird's plan was for this information:

We assimilated the information
We created a document containing it - only the facts as they were presented to us, followed by a list of questions at the bottom
We were then going to

a - post it at our blog
b - Send it to SM for posting  ::MonkeyCool::
c - Send it to the BOYCOTT ARUBA site for posting
d - send it to ALL media outlets (including Endemol - DeVries in the NL)

I in with ya. Just a question.  What is the legal ramifications doing this here on SM versus what the Freebirds were doing on their site?


Is it even still possible to make a formal compilation with the threat of  legal action?  What did the Freebird attorney say about this?



I don't see how it could be an issue.  Kyle has no binding agreement of privacy with SM.  Jen didn't come here and suggest we become Freebirds.  I asked a former Frebird what we could do to keep their spirit alive.  Kyle's posts have already been outted.

Jen, would you be interested in being our fearless leader, becuase I think Klass has a full plate being our herder.

I personally think (without consulting counsel) that any former Freebird who would participate in putting something "official" forward could give actionable cause to Kyle.  Simply because of the originating circumstances.

But your point about SM and a lack of binding agreement with Kyle is a good one.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 06:59:36 PM
Has Greta said ANYTHING about Natalee since the week she was supposedly going there?? Did she completely abandon the "sold into slavery" angle? She went from 100mph to 0 overnight!  ::MonkeyConfused::

Yep and what happened to JQK meeting with Brinkman and MOS the first part of January? 

Did we ever find out if in fact JQK and Mark Fuhrman were in Aruba.  I thought it was only reported by "Glenda" which doesn't make it true at all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 29, 2009, 07:00:06 PM
Yes os, lol and wonder what they will think now ???  ::MonkeyRoll::

Hi Seamonkey - I think you do not have to like someone to use them - just let them think you like them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 07:01:11 PM
I think a lot to this is Following Schaeffer and the money,UnderwaterExpeditions and Trahan,Silvetti and those GeoLab companies,as well as where Kyle is working?I truly believe if we can pinpoint that as well as some of the business relationships it will come together.How to do that is the question.I think you have to let those Traitors continue to play there hands in terms of looking for the big payday of OIL contracts.It will happen!

My opinion:
I think Kyle entered with a honest heart. I think he got a little side tracked, but still thought he was "on the good side". It wasn't until about late Spring - early Summer when his financial responsibilities started to rely back on those he is "protecting" now. It's sad.

To some extent I agree with you Wreck.

I believe that sometime between the discovery of the cage and the December 30th dive that ALE become actively involved and ... John Silvetti was provided with an incentive to take a back seat ... look the other way as far as being a participant in the recovery efforts.

However ... Kyle Kingman and Tim Miller became problems.  They had both seen the ROV images and ... Kyle Kingman  whose professional expertise encompasses analysing ROV images  determined Natalee Holloway remains could possibly be in that cage/trap.

Also ... the lack of a chain of custody was very troubling to Kyle Kingman.  His original intentions were to to share his concerns regarding the happenings encompassing the recovery with Beth Holloway and the FBI upon returning home.

Kyle approached the Natalee's Freebirds for assistance in compiling a document that could be submitted to Beth Holloway and the FBI but ... somewhere along the line he had a change of heart.  Beth Holloway took a back seat and ... network negotiations with Louis Shaefer (ROV copyright) and Tim Trahan (diver) was where it was at.

It is my understanding that at some point in time the the Natalee's Freebirds' made the decision to send the compiled information to Beth Holloway, the FBI and John Kelly.  The Natalee's Freebirds were threatened with legal actions.  This is when Kermit made the decision to leave the coop and ... with the permission of Beth Holloway ... took the risk and exposed Kyle Kingman's own words and the ROV images on the Natalee Holloway forum at the SM site.

Consider copyright issue and network negotiations encompassing the ROV images ... I believe that exposure any further that the SM site would certainly result in legal litagation.

My prayer is the Beth Holloway, John Kelly and the FBI are working behind the scenes in regards to the what was recovered from the cage/trap by the enemy ... the enemy who has denied Natalee Holloway justice since the getgo.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGSMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care. Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing. Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it. The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap. From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography. I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857


PRIVATE EYE

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:01:11 PM


Thanks Ree.  Better safe than sorry.

Another question.  The person who was against outing Kyle at Freebirds---are they now at CnG's famous site?

Yes.  And I've recently learned he/she was a member there before he/she left Freebirds.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:04:30 PM

My opinion:
I think Kyle entered with a honest heart. I think he got a little side tracked, but still thought he was "on the good side". It wasn't until about late Spring - early mid Summer when his financial responsibilities started to rely back on those he is "protecting" now. It's sad.

I think this is 100% correct.  Though it may not have solely been financial responsibilities


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 07:04:56 PM


They were still soliciting funds up until April 3rd 2008??? ::MonkeyEek::

Yeppers!  John Silvetti himself talking about needing a million dollars!!

When did they leave Aruba again?

Who left Aruba and when?Do we really know other then the boat left between March 1st and 3rd.Who was on The Persistence?Guess we'll never know because there are no logs?

IIRC Kyle nor John were on the Persistence when it left.  I don't know about the others.

What made them want to stay behind?Any ideas or speculation as to why?

John and Kyle did not leave the Island around the same time that the Persistence sailed away?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link/source please.

Janet

I can probably find a link for Kyle, I think he told us here that he was taking a flight home.  John...well you probably won't like that source.   ::MonkeyWink::  I'll see what I can find.



Janet, OE's post about "flying out" can be found here.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=120

According to his post some were "flying out" on March 2nd, and the Persistence was leaving on March 2nd.

Kermit posted an email about the "meeting" that was on March 3rd.  

Thanks texasmom.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 07:05:00 PM
Yes os, lol and wonder what they will think now ???  ::MonkeyRoll::

Hi Seamonkey - I think you do not have to like someone to use them - just let them think you like them.

Yeah well i guess some can get that down to a fine art...disgustin. and for what??? do they even realize how foolish they look?? nvm, I know the answer..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:08:42 PM
Leak said: "Not sure how long caps has been around the case but he is about 50 years old & is his father's caregiver. I wonder if he has done some undercover work for ALE/KLPD. He has a brother who works for immigration at the airport & one that is an attorney. He said he knows Clyde Burke very well & has worked closely wioth him on some things.

Caps said: "How I know this is that my uncle is a Lawyer and He always talk abaout to have Roll duty."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2000


Leak said: "He does not email with me but he does with Lalas."

Leak said: "Caps is not Simian (AFAIK). He has indicated he knows who was either Shango or Simian. The person he thinks it is, is a cop."

Leak said: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke. "






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:09:30 PM
Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:28 am
my suggestion to kyle.....if there is something really in the works on your end you best call or contact beth and inform her....and if she decides the freebirds need to hold off...then so be it!
kermie is not doing this without beth's consent....remember that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:10:36 PM
The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies;  
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
(just another Dutch connection with John)


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:11:28 PM
lalasmom Email:

"How did you come across the 7A Catiri address for Freddy?   This is close to where Caps lives."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 07:11:34 PM


Thanks Ree.  Better safe than sorry.

Another question.  The person who was against outing Kyle at Freebirds---are they now at CnG's famous site?

Yes.  And I've recently learned he/she was a member there before he/she left Freebirds.

Ha Ha.  Good guess on my part.  NOW it is starting to make sense to me.  And now Kyle is posting at CnG?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:12:11 PM
Aruba Tourism Authority - Vernon Vrolijk (regional rep in Atlanta, GA)


http://books.dreambook.com/wyndyacres/wyndyacres.html




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:12:57 PM


Thanks Ree.  Better safe than sorry.

Another question.  The person who was against outing Kyle at Freebirds---are they now at CnG's famous site?

Yes.  And I've recently learned he/she was a member there before he/she left Freebirds.

Ha Ha.  Good guess on my part.  NOW it is starting to make sense to me.  And now Kyle is posting at CnG?

Pretty Sad isn't it Blue Moon?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:14:29 PM
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://index.php?topic=8398.0 - BFN forum
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies;  
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
(just another Dutch connection with John)


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:16:31 PM


Thanks Ree.  Better safe than sorry.

Another question.  The person who was against outing Kyle at Freebirds---are they now at CnG's famous site?

Yes.  And I've recently learned he/she was a member there before he/she left Freebirds.

Ha Ha.  Good guess on my part.  NOW it is starting to make sense to me.  And now Kyle is posting at CnG?

Yes, that is my understanding.

It was a sad and disturbing day for all when Kyle became the priority over Natalee Holloway, her family, and justice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:20:00 PM
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://index.php?topic=8398.0 - BFN forum
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies;  
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
(just another Dutch connection with John)


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.





I believe we posted earlier that Silvetti was still soliciting for money on April 3rd.Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 07:20:34 PM


Thanks Ree.  Better safe than sorry.

Another question.  The person who was against outing Kyle at Freebirds---are they now at CnG's famous site?

Yes.  And I've recently learned he/she was a member there before he/she left Freebirds.

Ha Ha.  Good guess on my part.  NOW it is starting to make sense to me.  And now Kyle is posting at CnG?

Yes, that is my understanding.

It was a sad and disturbing day for all when Kyle became the priority over Natalee Holloway, her family, and justice.

Kyle is or was a member at CnG but I don't know if he's actually contributed any posts/information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 07:21:17 PM
Aruba Tourism Authority - Vernon Vrolijk (regional rep in Atlanta, GA)


http://books.dreambook.com/wyndyacres/wyndyacres.html




O.k. Kermit this is going to drive me crazy but very early on I remember reading someone putting up something about their chow chow's and seems it was wyndyacres.  This link takes you to comment page but the actual website is gone.  Why does that not surprise me. Now I am going to drive myself crazy trying to find where and who posted that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:22:07 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 29, 2009, 07:22:14 PM

This is for Natalee, for Natalee's family, for her friends, for everyone who stills feels the pain of the sudden, shocking and needless way she was torn away. 

It's for those who understand that while time marches on (and all you can do is keep breathing in & out through those moments when it hits you all over again) somewhere in time there can be, and is supposed to be, healing

It's for anyone distracted from, detracting from, standing in the way of, or intentionally denying the justice required for that healing to begin.

And it's for everyone who's lost a loved one, found the strength to carry on, and then reached out a hand to help another do the same.

We are all parts of the same whole, all miracles from the same Creator.  This why I continue to believe that the truth will rise and justice be found - not for retribution - but so that healing and peace can follow. 



An Irish Funeral Prayer
Death is nothing at all.
It does not count.
I have only slipped away into the next room.
Everything remains as it was.
The old life that we lived so fondly together is untouched, unchanged.
Whatever we were to each other, that we are still.
Call me by the old familiar name.
Speak of me in the easy way which you always used.
Put no sorrow in your tone.
Laugh as we always laughed at the little jokes that we enjoyed together.
Play, smile, think of me, pray for me.
Let my name be ever the household word that it always was.
Let it be spoken without effort.
Life means all that it ever meant. It is the same as it ever was.
There is unbroken continuity.
Why should I be out of mind because I am out of sight?
I am but waiting for you, for an interval, somewhere very near, just around the corner.
All is well. Nothing is hurt; nothing is lost.
One brief moment and all will be as it was before.
How we shall laugh at the trouble of parting, when we meet again.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 07:23:10 PM
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://index.php?topic=8398.0 - BFN forum
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies;  
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
(just another Dutch connection with John)


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.





the highlighted section above almost appears to me as a shake-down by either Aruba or the Dutch Company trying to recover that $10million they claimed to have wasted on looking for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:23:55 PM
Aruba Tourism Authority - Vernon Vrolijk (regional rep in Atlanta, GA)


http://books.dreambook.com/wyndyacres/wyndyacres.html




O.k. Kermit this is going to drive me crazy but very early on I remember reading someone putting up something about their chow chow's and seems it was wyndyacres.  This link takes you to comment page but the actual website is gone.  Why does that not surprise me. Now I am going to drive myself crazy trying to find where and who posted that.

I find it interesting that there is a  Vernon Vrolijk with Aruban Tourism
There is a Vrolijk who likes chow dogs.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:24:53 PM
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://index.php?topic=8398.0 - BFN forum
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies;  
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
(just another Dutch connection with John)


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.





the highlighted section above almost appears to me as a shake-down by either Aruba or the Dutch Company trying to recover that $10million they claimed to have wasted on looking for Natalee.

Whoa, I never thought of that angle.
 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:26:15 PM
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://index.php?topic=8398.0 - BFN forum
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies;  
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
(just another Dutch connection with John)


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.





I believe we posted earlier that Silvetti was still soliciting for money on April 3rd.Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's!

You are correct. He made an appeal on BFN for MONEY/donations.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:26:45 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:28:58 PM
From: "daveholloway
To: XXXXX
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:53:02 AM
Subject: Re: Lala's Mom from Scared Monkeys


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:30:18 PM
Who's  currently copy and pasting for CnG? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:31:27 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

I don't think so.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 07:31:39 PM
From: "daveholloway
To: XXXXX
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:53:02 AM
Subject: Re: Lala's Mom from Scared Monkeys


O.K. but wasn't LaLa's Mom from Georgia?  Don't throw nanners at me just asking. (I know it is none of my business)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:32:08 PM
Lifesong, that was beautiful.  Thank you for posting it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:33:34 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

I don't think so.





Ok.Thanx!These V's that you've been posting i will almost gaurantee you are not to many degree's away from the Van Der Sloot's.That is just my opinion!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 07:33:51 PM
Lifesong, that was beautiful.  Thank you for posting it.

I agree. Very touching.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:34:06 PM
Klaas - thank you for that distinction.  I believe you are correct.

Emails and IM's are another story though  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:35:32 PM
From: "daveholloway
To: XXXXX
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:53:02 AM
Subject: Re: Lala's Mom from Scared Monkeys


O.K. but wasn't LaLa's Mom from Georgia?  Don't throw nanners at me just asking. (I know it is none of my business)

LEAK said: "Lalas knows [edited] & lives in Bama, near Bham



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 29, 2009, 07:40:54 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

I don't think so.





Ok.Thanx!These V's that you've been posting i will almost gaurantee you are not to many degree's away from the Van Der Sloot's.That is just my opinion!

I think so too.
That is who all these posters attacking Freebirds are protecting.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 07:41:58 PM


Thank you Lifesong!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 07:47:38 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

I don't think so.





Ok.Thanx!These V's that you've been posting i will almost gaurantee you are not to many degree's away from the Van Der Sloot's.That is just my opinion!

I think so too.
That is who all these posters attacking Freebirds are protecting.




Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:50:25 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

I don't think so.





Ok.Thanx!These V's that you've been posting i will almost gaurantee you are not to many degree's away from the Van Der Sloot's.That is just my opinion!

I think so too.
That is who all these posters attacking Freebirds are protecting.




Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

Do the research on that last name Blue Moon!Your a very smart Monkey! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 07:51:28 PM
Who's  currently copy and pasting for CnG? ::MonkeyLaugh::

I would hate to be the grunt that has to do all the Copying and pasting!Just saying.You all know i'm not that organized! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 29, 2009, 07:52:16 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Hmmm this is very strange to me I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
 So we must know this leak Faith doesn't post much here because she is a Mod at HFTM.
So where did the three of us post together that we can't be trusted.
NH.US ?
We can't be trusted LEAK why because we saw right through your ass.
 I will have to think on this tonight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:52:22 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 07:55:01 PM
 :pig: :2waver:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 07:56:48 PM



Hmmm this is very strange to me I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
 So we must know this leak  Faith doesn't post much here because she is a Mod at HFTM.
So where did the three of us post together that we can't be trusted.
NH.US ?
We can't be trusted LEAK why because we saw right through your ass.
 I will have to think on this tonight.


Yes, I'm sure many know this leak.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 29, 2009, 08:00:55 PM



Hmmm this is very strange to me I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
 So we must know this leak  Faith doesn't post much here because she is a Mod at HFTM.
So where did the three of us post together that we can't be trusted.
NH.US ?
We can't be trusted LEAK why because we saw right through your ass.
 I will have to think on this tonight.


Yes, I'm sure many know this leak.

I wonder if their first name begins with R


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 08:05:19 PM



Hmmm this is very strange to me I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
 So we must know this leak  Faith doesn't post much here because she is a Mod at HFTM.
So where did the three of us post together that we can't be trusted.
NH.US ?
We can't be trusted LEAK why because we saw right through your ass.
 I will have to think on this tonight.


Yes, I'm sure many know this leak.

I wonder if their first name begins with R

Just to keep this from going too far in a wrong direction...........no, first name does not start with "R"

But I made a promise long ago that no personal information ever shared with me by anyone, would ever be disclosed by me.

That promise stands firm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 08:06:37 PM
Who's  currently copy and pasting for CnG? ::MonkeyLaugh::

I would hate to be the grunt that has to do all the Copying and pasting!Just saying.You all know i'm not that organized! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 29, 2009, 08:06:51 PM
Did lalasmom ever figure out to log in to SM from her new computer, in order to refute Kermit?  ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 08:08:00 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 08:08:25 PM
Did lalasmom ever figure out to log in to SM from her new computer, in order to refute Kermit?  ::MonkeyHaHa::



I kinda doubt that's gonna happen.   ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 08:09:19 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

You OK Blue Moon! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 08:12:33 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

You OK Blue Moon! ::MonkeyCool::

I am having a "Oh Damn" moment.  I didn't really understand what was happening with the CnG people disrupting here all the time but I do believe today a lightbulb is starting to go off.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 29, 2009, 08:13:45 PM
Just wishful thinking.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 08:15:27 PM
I share that wish, none!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 08:16:09 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

You OK Blue Moon! ::MonkeyCool::

I am having a "Oh Damn" moment.  I didn't really understand what was happening with the CnG people disrupting here all the time but I do believe today a lightbulb is starting to go off.

Hope all is well down there Blue Moon!We had bad weather up here but nothing like down there!Prayers from Seattle.. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 08:18:03 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

You OK Blue Moon! ::MonkeyCool::

I am having a "Oh Damn" moment.  I didn't really understand what was happening with the CnG people disrupting here all the time but I do believe today a lightbulb is starting to go off.

You arent alone bluemoon :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 08:18:12 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

For some of them, I don't think that was ever their intention.  I believe they just didn't *think* before they took action.

Being suckered in by someone's song and dance in a "I know but I can't tell" way, along with cryptic messages and "I'm from Aruba" just seems to have gotten in the way of logic and common sense - to the detriment of facts and truth.

I think pride and ego has played a factor for some as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 08:19:22 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

Keepthefaith ... what part of Kermit's post causes you to think mybe Lala is refering to you.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 08:21:51 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

For some of them, I don't think that was ever their intention.  I believe they just didn't *think* before they took action.

Being suckered in by someone's song and dance in a "I know but I can't tell" way, along with cryptic messages and "I'm from Aruba" just seems to have gotten in the way of logic and common sense - to the detriment of facts and truth.

I think pride and ego has played a factor for some as well.

I think Shange/Simeon has gotten to some of them. 

I just HATE that line:  I know but I can't tell.

Hope they learned their lesson with Kermit.  Kermit told. She warned them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 29, 2009, 08:22:27 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

This is how I felt the first time I realized that there were Aruban posters whose only job it was each day was to come here with disinformation....it was a jaw-dropping moment.   :shock:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 08:23:00 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

Keepthefaith ... what part of Kermit's post causes you to think mybe Lala is refering to you.

Janet



"I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them."

Kermit it clarified it though.I didn't know Lala's!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 08:23:02 PM
I think the Faith part, Janet.  It took me a while....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 08:25:08 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

This is how I felt the first time I realized that there were Aruban posters whose only job it was each day was to come here with disinformation....it was a jaw-dropping moment.   :shock:

I guess I am a full-blood Monkey now.  I just passed my initiation.  Darn, took me long enough.   :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 08:26:10 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

Keepthefaith ... what part of Kermit's post causes you to think mybe Lala is refering to you.

Janet



Oh I get it.

Keepthefaith ... the "Faith" that Lala is referring to is a girl Monkey.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 08:26:15 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

For some of them, I don't think that was ever their intention.  I believe they just didn't *think* before they took action.

Being suckered in by someone's song and dance in a "I know but I can't tell" way, along with cryptic messages and "I'm from Aruba" just seems to have gotten in the way of logic and common sense - to the detriment of facts and truth.

I think pride and ego has played a factor for some as well.
I agree, but I think it is more like ALL of them instead of just "some". These are not bad people ( they want justice for Natalee - just like us). I think they have been horribly mislead.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 08:26:45 PM
I think the Faith part, Janet.  It took me a while....

Thanks you 2NJSons_Mom

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 08:28:19 PM
Don't be hard on yourself, Blue Moon.  You have popcorn.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 29, 2009, 08:29:42 PM
From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
I do not trust Faith, Blonde or Hotshot any further than I can throw them.
Lala's has warned Caps about Hotshot so he won't tell her anything. LOL



Leak said:Clyde Burke is Caps friend & who some of us felt may be Simian.
I can't answer all the questions about Caps cause I just don't know. He does not email with me but he does with Lalas.

LEAK: "Tue Mar 18, 2008
Here is a portion of a Capslock email:
I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS. but with the Government on strike, nobody is working. Polis department
has minimum service now just to maintain tranquility on the island.


LEAK: " I have access to a witness statement from this "pond witness". Sure seems from what I see that what he said & what is being translated on some boards are very different."


LEAK: "Caps knows a few ALE
I know he knows Clyde Burke.


John stayed and kept an eye on the side with the ALE till before the strike begin. 2 days the before venezuala crisis, John and some one scanned the pond.


Lala's is not refering to me is she Kermit??

Keepthefaith ... what part of Kermit's post causes you to think mybe Lala is refering to you.

Janet



Oh I get it.

Keepthefaith ... the "Faith" that Lala is referring to is a girl Monkey.

Janet

Isn't that the "leak" saying that about Faith and not Lalas?? or am I reading it wrong..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 08:30:19 PM
Klaas,

Has SIGuido registered here, yet?    ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 08:31:41 PM
OS,

I understood LEAK said it to Lala's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 08:31:54 PM
Here is something to think long and hard about.

If it required Helen LeJuez to make contact with ALE on behalf of the witness, yet Caps is friends with Clyde Burke.......

Well.  What does that tell you about Clyde Burke's role in this, and therefore Caps' trustworthiness?  Especially in light of the fact that Caps himself made allusions to it being Clyde Burke that helped him understand the Shango/Simian stuff?

If Clyde Burke (and therefore Caps) was on the up and up................why did Helen LeJuez have to make contact with ALE after having spoken to this witness?

After all, this witness was brought to her by Caps (and John Silvetti, don't forget), who is friends with Clyde Burke, with whom Caps had obviously been discussing things with (ie, his post re Shango/Simian).

Wouldn't the logical sequence of events have been for Caps to take this witness directly to Clyde Burke?  Why the subterfuge of having the attorney contact ALE on behalf of the witness??

From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 08:33:28 PM
Wreck, I tend to agree with you.  I have read here from the beginning and I believe some have gotten in over their heads with all this BECAUSE they do want Justice for Natalee.  It is still not an excuse for the bashing of SM and Klaas or Kermit or Janet (and I could go on and on).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 08:35:56 PM
I wonder why this "leak " is so highly protected no one can know the name..enough is bein said of this "leak" certainly it has another name people are more familiar with...not a real name even..but a user name..whats the big secret in this person's identity at this point?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 29, 2009, 08:36:17 PM
OS,

I understood LEAK said it to Lala's.

ty

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 08:37:06 PM
Here is something to think long and hard about.

If it required Helen LeJuez to make contact with ALE on behalf of the witness, yet Caps is friends with Clyde Burke.......

Well.  What does that tell you about Clyde Burke's role in this, and therefore Caps' trustworthiness?  Especially in light of the fact that Caps himself made allusions to it being Clyde Burke that helped him understand the Shango/Simian stuff?

If Clyde Burke (and therefore Caps) was on the up and up................why did Helen LeJuez have to make contact with ALE after having spoken to this witness?

After all, this witness was brought to her by Caps (and John Silvetti, don't forget), who is friends with Clyde Burke, with whom Caps had obviously been discussing things with (ie, his post re Shango/Simian).

Wouldn't the logical sequence of events have been for Caps to take this witness directly to Clyde Burke?  Why the subterfuge of having the attorney contact ALE on behalf of the witness??

From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
 


Wouldn't this offer the witness some sort of counsel and thus cover the story that he was fearful, etc.?  Just thinking about covering of all portions of that storyline.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 29, 2009, 08:41:05 PM
Wreck, I tend to agree with you.  I have read here from the beginning and I believe some have gotten in over their heads with all this BECAUSE they do want Justice for Natalee.  It is still not an excuse for the bashing of SM and Klaas or Kermit or Janet (and I could go on and on).
Absolutely!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 08:42:48 PM
Here is something to think long and hard about.

If it required Helen LeJuez to make contact with ALE on behalf of the witness, yet Caps is friends with Clyde Burke.......

Well.  What does that tell you about Clyde Burke's role in this, and therefore Caps' trustworthiness?  Especially in light of the fact that Caps himself made allusions to it being Clyde Burke that helped him understand the Shango/Simian stuff?

If Clyde Burke (and therefore Caps) was on the up and up................why did Helen LeJuez have to make contact with ALE after having spoken to this witness?

After all, this witness was brought to her by Caps (and John Silvetti, don't forget), who is friends with Clyde Burke, with whom Caps had obviously been discussing things with (ie, his post re Shango/Simian).

Wouldn't the logical sequence of events have been for Caps to take this witness directly to Clyde Burke?  Why the subterfuge of having the attorney contact ALE on behalf of the witness??

From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
 


Wouldn't this offer the witness some sort of counsel and thus cover the story that he was fearful, etc.?  Just thinking about covering of all portions of that storyline.

Yes - it certainly could.  And that's a good point.

But remember, Caps has an uncle who is an attorney.

An attorney for an uncle, and a friend within ALE.  What more assurance could a witness want?

After all, the witness supposedly approached Caps with his story.....................why Caps?  Of all people? 

Surely that meant this witness felt he was safe telling Caps? 
Surely when the witness mentioned wanting counsel and being fearful - Caps would have assuaged his fears by sharing with him the "in" he had with ALE, and the relative of his who could provide legal advice?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 08:43:39 PM
Klaas,

Has SIGuido registered here, yet?    ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: Not under that name but they are a member of SM  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 08:50:16 PM
Here is something to think long and hard about.

If it required Helen LeJuez to make contact with ALE on behalf of the witness, yet Caps is friends with Clyde Burke.......

Well.  What does that tell you about Clyde Burke's role in this, and therefore Caps' trustworthiness?  Especially in light of the fact that Caps himself made allusions to it being Clyde Burke that helped him understand the Shango/Simian stuff?

If Clyde Burke (and therefore Caps) was on the up and up................why did Helen LeJuez have to make contact with ALE after having spoken to this witness?

After all, this witness was brought to her by Caps (and John Silvetti, don't forget), who is friends with Clyde Burke, with whom Caps had obviously been discussing things with (ie, his post re Shango/Simian).

Wouldn't the logical sequence of events have been for Caps to take this witness directly to Clyde Burke?  Why the subterfuge of having the attorney contact ALE on behalf of the witness??

From: LEAK  Thu Mar 06, 2008
hiya Caps emailed Dave & he didn't understand what he was trying to say. Lala's Mom then emailed Dave & explained what Caps was trying to say. Dave emailed her back & the next thing we know they got permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness he had found. The witness contacted Helen Lejuez & then she contacted ALE for him. He (the witness) has given a statement & this is why the search was granted. I know they used side scan sonar & were waiting for Kyle (or someone) to look at the pics. Caps told lala's they were going to drain Monserat pond for further searching. Will let you know what I find out.
 


Wouldn't this offer the witness some sort of counsel and thus cover the story that he was fearful, etc.?  Just thinking about covering of all portions of that storyline.

Yes - it certainly could.  And that's a good point.

But remember, Caps has an uncle who is an attorney.

An attorney for an uncle, and a friend within ALE.  What more assurance could a witness want?

After all, the witness supposedly approached Caps with his story.....................why Caps?  Of all people? 

Surely that meant this witness felt he was safe telling Caps? 
Surely when the witness mentioned wanting counsel and being fearful - Caps would have assuaged his fears by sharing with him the "in" he had with ALE, and the relative of his who could provide legal advice?



I follow you, completely, but was trying to think of this as if it were part of a plan.  Was Dave encouraged to have Lejeuz speak to the witness on his behalf beforehand?   Lejeuz may have been more preferred than Caps' uncle or his friend in ALE. 

Throwing questions out there...shoot them down...it's okay by me. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 08:53:01 PM


I think you could be right 2NJ.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 08:59:48 PM


Are you really serious?  These former SM's would be protecting the VanderSloots? I would never have thought that. Guess nothing would shock me though at this point.

I hope kerm doesn't mind me butting into this one.

Of course!!  Who benefits the most by the attempted discrediting of this information?  When that didn't work, the attempted discrediting of the messengers.



This is all much bigger than I thought.  I am shocked.  You really do not know people who post on websites like you think you do.  This misconception must always be remembered by anyone who posts on any website.

For some of them, I don't think that was ever their intention.  I believe they just didn't *think* before they took action.

Being suckered in by someone's song and dance in a "I know but I can't tell" way, along with cryptic messages and "I'm from Aruba" just seems to have gotten in the way of logic and common sense - to the detriment of facts and truth.

I think pride and ego has played a factor for some as well.
I agree, but I think it is more like ALL of them instead of just "some". These are not bad people ( they want justice for Natalee - just like us). I think they have been horribly mislead.

Mislead or not.  They cannot be given a free pass.  Bottom Line:  They are indirectly  participants in John Silvette's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

I cannot comprehend the mentality.  All those who now upholding John Silvetti, Kyle Kingman or Tim Trahan would be taking an entirely different position if there had been a possibility that their loved one could have been in that trap/cage.  I believe condemnation would be where it was at if ... the opportunity to bring their loved one home may have been forever.

Janet

____

REMINDER:

THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION - JOHN SILVETTI


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 29, 2009, 09:01:21 PM


I follow you, completely, but was trying to think of this as if it were part of a plan.  Was Dave encouraged to have Lejeuz speak to the witness on his behalf beforehand?   Lejeuz may have been more preferred than Caps' uncle or his friend in ALE. 

Throwing questions out there...shoot them down...it's okay by me. 

I'm with you - trust me.  I appreciate the dialogue.

Now, I've heard three different stories about who spoke to this witness on Dave's behalf.  All 3 have come from the cng crew - so take your pick on which one you like best  ::MonkeyRoll::

1 - Dave asked Tim Miller to speak with this witness for him - not possible, as Tim was no longer on the boat (or Aruba) when this happened

2 - Dave asked Helen Lejuez to speak with this witness for him - possible, but then where does Silvetti fit in, as Kyle told us this guy and his attorney  ::MonkeyWink:: approached Persistence, and would ONLY speak to Persistence folks - and no family member or ALE knew of this guy at that point.

3 - Hot Shot put this witness in touch with Silvetti  - this story matches what Kyle told us (but remember, he had his attorney at his side for this first time meeting)

And with that, I must leave the cage for the night.

Goodnight monkeys!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 09:04:07 PM


I think you could be right 2NJ.   ::MonkeyCool::

Remember, Caps anonymity was of the utmost for his safety.  Why put his uncle in harms way....the bad guys are on that island, as we all know. 

Did I sound like a drive by?     ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 09:06:11 PM


I think you could be right 2NJ.   ::MonkeyCool::

Remember, Caps anonymity was of the utmost for his safety.  Why put his uncle in harms way....the bad guys are on that island, as we all know. 

Did I sound like a drive by?     ::MonkeyHaHa::

Protect CapsLockWizard from the people that are his friends!Logic doesn't dictate. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 09:07:38 PM


I think you could be right 2NJ.   ::MonkeyCool::

Remember, Caps anonymity was of the utmost for his safety.  Why put his uncle in harms way....the bad guys are on that island, as we all know. 

Did I sound like a drive by?     ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 09:10:41 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Carry on....I'll be back.  Going to rest my peepers for a bit. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 09:11:07 PM
Very interesting stuff! ::MonkeyCool:: BBL!God Bless tha Monkey's in the cage! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 09:12:33 PM


Goodnight jen!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 09:34:48 PM
meanwhile... back at underbelly control central..awaiting orders for the next shift change...

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/shiftchange1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 09:49:43 PM
meanwhile... back at underbelly control central..awaiting orders for the next shift change...

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/shiftchange1.gif)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 09:51:50 PM
 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 09:52:00 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 09:57:22 PM
Posted by Debbie at BFN:

A friend from the Netherlands sent this to me:

Hans Mos says he is still investigating some details, but also admits that one has to come to a conclusion if there is sufficient motif to continue to investigate or not.

At this moment the OM and the police are still awaiting some investigative result, and still do not have a date to be able to tell at what day they will close the investigation against Joran vd Sloot, it is being looked into if the request to the public has resulted in information that is relevant for the case.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 09:57:53 PM

I agree, but I think it is more like ALL of them instead of just "some". These are not bad people ( they want justice for Natalee - just like us). I think they have been horribly mislead.

Misled or not.  They cannot be given a free pass.  Bottom Line:  They are indirectly  participants in John Silvette's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

I cannot comprehend the mentality.  All those who now upholding John Silvetti, Kyle Kingman or Tim Trahan would be taking an entirely different position if there had been a possibility that their loved one could have been in that trap/cage.  I believe condemnation would be where it was at if ... the opportunity to bring their loved one home may have been lost forever.

Janet

____

REMINDER:

THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION - JOHN SILVETTI


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 09:58:55 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 10:01:15 PM
Posted by Debbie at BFN:

A friend from the Netherlands sent this to me:

Hans Mos says he is still investigating some details, but also admits that one has to come to a conclusion if there is sufficient motif to continue to investigate or not.

At this moment the OM and the police are still awaiting some investigative result, and still do not have a date to be able to tell at what day they will close the investigation against Joran vd Sloot, it is being looked into if the request to the public has resulted in information that is relevant for the case.


Aruba ... do whatever you want.  One day there will be a day of reckoning.

Janet

+++++++

'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for December 1
updated 7:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: ... The reason this case could still be solved is because there are so many people involved in Natalee's disappearance and in the disposal of her body. When somebody talks, they're going to all go down. This is like a house of cards.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 10:01:58 PM
Posted by Debbie at BFN:

A friend from the Netherlands sent this to me:

Hans Mos says he is still investigating some details, but also admits that one has to come to a conclusion if there is sufficient motif to continue to investigate or not.

At this moment the OM and the police are still awaiting some investigative result, and still do not have a date to be able to tell at what day they will close the investigation against Joran vd Sloot, it is being looked into if the request to the public has resulted in information that is relevant for the case.


This is no surprise, but still disappointing to read.  :(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 10:03:13 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 10:03:59 PM
I just want the C&G folks to know that they are grasping
at straws.  They cannot stop the Monkeys, no matter how
hard they try.
The truth will prevail no matter how hard they try to twist it.
 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 10:05:50 PM
I just want the C&G folks to know that they are grasping
at straws.  They cannot stop the Monkeys, no matter how
hard they try.
The truth will prevail no matter how hard they try to twist it.
 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyTongue::

Logic dictates!!

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:06:57 PM
I just want the C&G folks to know that they are grasping
at straws.  They cannot stop the Monkeys, no matter how
hard they try.
The truth will prevail no matter how hard they try to twist it.
 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyTongue::

Logic dictates!!

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet


 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:08:51 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:10:19 PM
meanwhile... back at underbelly control central..awaiting orders for the next shift change...

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/shiftchange1.gif)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 10:11:14 PM
Hiya san :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:13:37 PM
Hiya san :)

hiya Seamonkey  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 29, 2009, 10:13:46 PM
I just noticed we have 21 monkeys logged in and 20 guests.  First time in a while the logged in monks outnumber guests when I've been here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 10:15:01 PM
Well, hubby is reading a book that his sister authored and publish regarding his family's roots in British Columbia.  The history goes back over 102 years.

However ... I want to play a game or two of Scabble.  I do believe that I will emerge the victor.  I only have walk toward him with my fingers wiggling in front of me while threatening to tickle him.  He gives in every time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
7:15 PM PT



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 10:15:35 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:16:03 PM
Well, hubby is reading a book that his sister authored and publish regarding his family's roots in British Columbia.  The history goes back over 102 years.

However ... I want to play a game or two of Scabble.  I do believe that I will emerge the victor.  I only have walk toward him with my fingers wiggling in front of me while threatening to tickle him.  He gives in every time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
7:15 PM PT



Have a good night Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:16:26 PM
Well, hubby is reading a book that his sister authored and publish regarding his family's roots in British Columbia.  The history goes back over 102 years.

However ... I want to play a game or two of Scabble.  I do believe that I will emerge the victor.  I only have walk toward him with my fingers wiggling in front of me while threatening to tickle him.  He gives in every time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
7:15 PM PT

Nite Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 29, 2009, 10:16:33 PM
Good night Janet.  (http://bestsmileys.com/sleeping/11.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:17:53 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 10:18:54 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hello magnolia, well if san dont perk up i am sure many others will help ya on ya quest. lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 10:21:04 PM
Wow....I left for awhile to go out to eat and come back and all hell has broken loose but it is so good to see all of these Monkeys in the cage...  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 29, 2009, 10:23:11 PM
Wow....I left for awhile to go out to eat and come back and all hell has broken loose but it is so good to see all of these Monkeys in the cage...  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyDance::

I agree, its really neat!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:26:06 PM
Wow....I left for awhile to go out to eat and come back and all hell has broken loose but it is so good to see all of these Monkeys in the cage...  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hi Hotping!  Yes, it is GREAT to see everyone here!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 29, 2009, 10:26:59 PM
Disappointing.  Shame on them.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

They don't deserve to be a Scared Monkey.

When you have lost your good name you have nothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 10:27:39 PM
Wow....I left for awhile to go out to eat and come back and all hell has broken loose but it is so good to see all of these Monkeys in the cage...  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyDance::

I agree, its really neat!  ::MonkeyWink::
Yes it is Neat...  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:28:10 PM
Disappointing.  Shame on them.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

They don't deserve to be a Scared Monkey.

When you have lost your good name you have nothing.

So true snoopy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 10:29:17 PM
Wow....I left for awhile to go out to eat and come back and all hell has broken loose but it is so good to see all of these Monkeys in the cage...  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hi Hotping!  Yes, it is GREAT to see everyone here!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::
Hey TM...  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 10:30:58 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 10:33:19 PM
(http://www.bucuticam.com/zoom1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 10:35:01 PM
http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67407

Cooperation Is Essential To Avoid Severe Recession


January 28th 2009, Aruba.


ORANJESTAD-The economy of Aruba is about to enter a period of contraction, this is mainly
attributed to the global credit crisis. The Central Bank of Aruba (CBA) is expecting a decrease of
1.2 percent in Real GDP for 2009. Aruba will experience its second recession in just 5 years in what
is to be a decade of relatively low economic growth.

There may be a decline in investments from the private sector in large projects on the island, this
as a consequence of the difficulty for foreign investors to receive loans from banks. In addition the
number of tourist arrivals is expected to decline between 5.6 and 6.1 percent in 2009. The decline
in tourist arrivals may result in the contraction of tourism receipts by 2 percent.

Value of imported goods from abroad is expected to decline by 6.9 percent. The value of exported
goods to other countries in the World is expected to decline by 10.6 percent in 2009. The annual
inflation rate is expected to decline from 8.5 percent in 2008 to 4.2 percent in 2009, which is
considered a positive trend by CBA. The value of consumed goods on the island is expected to
increase by 0.6 percent.

Substantial and aggressive marketing of Aruba abroad may soften the decline in tourism, and
government spending on infrastructure and other community projects should provide jobs
(temporarily) for the construction sector. The government has already allocated an additional
US$10 million to market Aruba abroad. AHATA (Aruba Hotel & Tourism Association) will allocate
more money for marketing. The cooperation between the public and private sector, and the
commitment of both sectors is essential to avoid a moderate to severe recession.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 29, 2009, 10:35:10 PM
(http://www.bucuticam.com/zoom1.jpg)


Yes, I can see tourism is just booming  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:36:56 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.

Don't let what they say about me hurt your feelings.  They won't get to me I promise.  :smt066


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 29, 2009, 10:37:41 PM
The people at Chat and Grumble, SS and Hotshot included apparently, as they have exposed that here.
Are wrong.
So, had they not followed what someone else told them they would have known:
I have been involved in many high profile cases.
I have accomplished busting drug rings, a president of the US, etc.

And I am not going to spend my time on stupidity. It only exposes what they do as opposed to bring something of importance to the discussion about Natalee. IS that what that site is all about?
Who is next from scared monkeys at their site?


If they think I am afraid - lets bring it on!

How about I expose THEM?











For God's Sake Kermit.Please tell me before you do so i may put on my Feces suit before the Sh_t starts to fly! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

This is one of their members, one of lalasmom and Idstlou's buddies who is their LEAK:
Remember, It was Idstlou who posted that I was lying about not having lalasmom's emails.

Who is lying? You be the judge:

(http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/2531/emailscreenshotheaderfrcg3.jpg)

oh lawdy here we go How do I get sucked into this crap?
I have no idea what SS posted..it was deleted before I got here.

What "friend" are you talking about?

I didn't say you didn't have Lalas emails...although you probably shouldn't? Why would you have them?

I said you don't have an email from Lalas to you...which is what you announced here on SM...saying that Lalas wrote you in an e-mail stating Jug knew the Persistence was going to Aruba to search for oil first, Natalee secondly.

You then changed your story to: you didn't have an e-mail addressed to you from Lalas...but you had a copy of an e-mail that Lalas wrote stating that Jug said the Persistence went to Aruba to search for oil first and Natalee second. I stated I did not believe for one moment you have an e-mail from Lalas stating that. So far I have not seen it.

What have I have seen you post tonight..is tiny heading of an e-mail that is supposed to be from Lalas...with an attached document with what appears to be her research on Natalee's case...did I get that wrong? Why would you even have that info? Very creepy to me and just furthers my distrust of your motives and activities.

I also see other e-mails...from a supposed "leak"...that people are confusing as Lalas emails...in which this mystery person is giving opinions..often not nice ones..on various subjests and people.

What is the point and how does that advance justice for Natalee..and what in the hell does that have to do with me?

And for the record..it is ldstlou...as in Lisa. Most Monkeys here know my name..Lisa...and know my little Monkey's name. They have watched him grow up over the past 4 years, have cheered him on over sports events, First Holy Communion and other major events in our lives. They have given me advice during those "mother's moments" when I was at a loss..lol
I have prayed for and with Monkeys who have faced down cancer, lost spouses to cancer, and prayed with you all when we lost a member to cancer. I have prayed for Monkeys with ill family members and asked for my own prayers when needed and always received them...nothing but the greatest of support when I have needed it. That is something I have always been so proud of about this great group. Monkeys donated generously when I participated in the Race for the Cure in honor of Peaches and my Mom, they gave again generously when Sunny and I raised hell last year at the Travel Convention here in St Louis and laughed with us when we called in our reports about the abandoned Aruba booth. I could go on and on. Some of my best moments and treasured friends came right here from SM and I have gotten through some of my worst moments only because of the love and support of friends here at SM.

So please...respect me enough to use my correct screen name, and don't refer me to as a troll or an outsider. I am simply a Monkey the same as anyone else here...just a Monkey that does not believe in the current Persistence theory and speaks her mind and questions the reasons and motivations behind that theory.

I am also a Monkey that has always respected Klaas. I don't talk behind peoples' back and Klaas will tell you when I have had a beef with her, I have gone straight to her with the beef. Whether we agree on matters or not, I think that Klaas will attest that I have always shown her respect. I know nothing about the chat and grumble...not even sure of what it is called...nor what caused the rift between Monkeys...I just walked back into the forum when it was happening and got lumped in with it. I don't back stab, I don't "hidey hole"...and everything I have disagreed with I have been honest and open about, then I get bashed for being honest and open with it.

Thats all I have to say. It's just...well...seeing e-mails and gossip being passed along behind the scenes and then brought here to the forum...I am sorry and I know most of you don't agree with me, but it just makes me mistrust the messenger and the message even more. I have explained my reasons why, you don't have to agree...but please, don't draw me into the shit that is going on behind the scenes. I am open and honest about who I speak to and in regards to what.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:38:04 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.

I saw it too Magnolia, disgusting cowardly comments by someone who is very insecure, and jealous.  

They actually weren't nearly as hateful about San as they were about me, but then again...I think they are probably skeeeeeeeerrrrrrd of San!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 10:38:25 PM
(http://www.bucuticam.com/zoom1.jpg)
I kept waiting for a Monkey to jump out from behind one of the palm trees with a Boycott Aruba Sign...lol  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 29, 2009, 10:40:49 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.

Don't let what they say about me hurt your feelings.  They won't get to me I promise.  :smt066

Atta Girl, San   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 10:40:55 PM
San, ya gonna need sumtin bigger i fear lol

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/gun1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:43:28 PM
San, ya gonna need sumtin bigger i fear lol

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/gun1.gif)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 29, 2009, 10:43:53 PM
No matter how much money Aruba spends on marketing......

No Justice For Natalee
No Tourism for Aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 10:45:26 PM
http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67407

Cooperation Is Essential To Avoid Severe Recession


January 28th 2009, Aruba.


ORANJESTAD-The economy of Aruba is about to enter a period of contraction, this is mainly
attributed to the global credit crisis. The Central Bank of Aruba (CBA) is expecting a decrease of
1.2 percent in Real GDP for 2009. Aruba will experience its second recession in just 5 years in what
is to be a decade of relatively low economic growth.

There may be a decline in investments from the private sector in large projects on the island, this
as a consequence of the difficulty for foreign investors to receive loans from banks. In addition the
number of tourist arrivals is expected to decline between 5.6 and 6.1 percent in 2009. The decline
in tourist arrivals may result in the contraction of tourism receipts by 2 percent.

Value of imported goods from abroad is expected to decline by 6.9 percent. The value of exported
goods to other countries in the World is expected to decline by 10.6 percent in 2009. The annual
inflation rate is expected to decline from 8.5 percent in 2008 to 4.2 percent in 2009, which is
considered a positive trend by CBA. The value of consumed goods on the island is expected to
increase by 0.6 percent.

Substantial and aggressive marketing of Aruba abroad may soften the decline in tourism, and
government spending on infrastructure and other community projects should provide jobs
(temporarily) for the construction sector. The government has already allocated an additional
US$10 million to market Aruba abroad. AHATA (Aruba Hotel & Tourism Association) will allocate
more money for marketing. The cooperation between the public and private sector, and the
commitment of both sectors is essential to avoid a moderate to severe recession.


Wow, $10million to market that Devils island.  That's about like our congress giving away the house we live in.  What are they going to do, take the $10m and giveaway free airfare and hotel costs just to get someone, anyone to populate their sleezie island? 

I hope Mos goes on and closes the case.  He a chicken-shi$. Every time I look at him I see that picture Klaas posted of him with his dainty little hands on his hips (carrying his itty-bitty purse). 

I am SICK of hearing them talk about closing this case. Just do it and then see if they turn over anything involving this case to the family.  I hate them all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 10:45:38 PM
No matter how much money Aruba spends on marketing......

No Justice For Natalee
No Tourism for Aruba
I Agree!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 10:46:37 PM
Wow....I left for awhile to go out to eat and come back and all hell has broken loose but it is so good to see all of these Monkeys in the cage...  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyDance::


Me, too, Ree!

Every time I leave something happens.   ::MonkeyShocked::

Then I have to read back to catch up.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 29, 2009, 10:48:53 PM
http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67407

Cooperation Is Essential To Avoid Severe Recession


January 28th 2009, Aruba.


ORANJESTAD-The economy of Aruba is about to enter a period of contraction, this is mainly
attributed to the global credit crisis. The Central Bank of Aruba (CBA) is expecting a decrease of
1.2 percent in Real GDP for 2009. Aruba will experience its second recession in just 5 years in what
is to be a decade of relatively low economic growth.

There may be a decline in investments from the private sector in large projects on the island, this
as a consequence of the difficulty for foreign investors to receive loans from banks. In addition the
number of tourist arrivals is expected to decline between 5.6 and 6.1 percent in 2009. The decline
in tourist arrivals may result in the contraction of tourism receipts by 2 percent.

Value of imported goods from abroad is expected to decline by 6.9 percent. The value of exported
goods to other countries in the World is expected to decline by 10.6 percent in 2009. The annual
inflation rate is expected to decline from 8.5 percent in 2008 to 4.2 percent in 2009, which is
considered a positive trend by CBA. The value of consumed goods on the island is expected to
increase by 0.6 percent.

Substantial and aggressive marketing of Aruba abroad may soften the decline in tourism, and
government spending on infrastructure and other community projects should provide jobs
(temporarily) for the construction sector. The government has already allocated an additional
US$10 million to market Aruba abroad. AHATA (Aruba Hotel & Tourism Association) will allocate
more money for marketing. The cooperation between the public and private sector, and the
commitment of both sectors is essential to avoid a moderate to severe recession.


ps...they can show up to St Louis with their "marketing"...but I can guarantee you...my little Monkey and I will be there this weekend with a little "marketing" of our own...thanks to Vicky and some great materials by John. With any luck,  they will turn tail and run just like they did last year!!

NO JUSTICE FOR NATALEE, NO TOURISTS FOR ARUBA

I Always have, and always will Stand With The Girl!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:49:04 PM
San, ya gonna need sumtin bigger i fear lol

(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e3/Whimsies/gun1.gif)

Now that's a nice gun  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 29, 2009, 10:49:34 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.
[/quote]

I saw it too Magnolia, disgusting cowardly comments by someone who is very insecure, and jealous.  

They actually weren't nearly as hateful about San as they were about me, but then again...I think they are probably skeeeeeeeerrrrrrd of San!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


[/quote]

I know TM.  She has been hateful to me too.
I think they are mad because they were all so wrong
and let their pride and egos drag them down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 10:50:53 PM


I am also a Monkey that has always respected Klaas. I don't talk behind peoples' back and Klaas will tell you when I have had a beef with her, I have gone straight to her with the beef. Whether we agree on matters or not, I think that Klaas will attest that I have always shown her respect. I know nothing about the chat and grumble...not even sure of what it is called...nor what caused the rift between Monkeys...I just walked back into the forum when it was happening and got lumped in with it. I don't back stab, I don't "hidey hole"...and everything I have disagreed with I have been honest and open about, then I get bashed for being honest and open with it.

Thats all I have to say. It's just...well...seeing e-mails and gossip being passed along behind the scenes and then brought here to the forum...I am sorry and I know most of you don't agree with me, but it just makes me mistrust the messenger and the message even more. I have explained my reasons why, you don't have to agree...but please, don't draw me into the shit that is going on behind the scenes. I am open and honest about who I speak to and in regards to what.

LDSTLOU (Lisa) has never been affraid to come directly to me via email, this is true. She is also free to have her opinion of Kermit and Kermit's posts.  I may not agree with Lisa but I respect her right to her own opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 29, 2009, 10:51:26 PM
http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67407

Cooperation Is Essential To Avoid Severe Recession


January 28th 2009, Aruba.


ORANJESTAD-The economy of Aruba is about to enter a period of contraction, this is mainly
attributed to the global credit crisis. The Central Bank of Aruba (CBA) is expecting a decrease of
1.2 percent in Real GDP for 2009. Aruba will experience its second recession in just 5 years in what
is to be a decade of relatively low economic growth.

There may be a decline in investments from the private sector in large projects on the island, this
as a consequence of the difficulty for foreign investors to receive loans from banks. In addition the
number of tourist arrivals is expected to decline between 5.6 and 6.1 percent in 2009. The decline
in tourist arrivals may result in the contraction of tourism receipts by 2 percent.

Value of imported goods from abroad is expected to decline by 6.9 percent. The value of exported
goods to other countries in the World is expected to decline by 10.6 percent in 2009. The annual
inflation rate is expected to decline from 8.5 percent in 2008 to 4.2 percent in 2009, which is
considered a positive trend by CBA. The value of consumed goods on the island is expected to
increase by 0.6 percent.

Substantial and aggressive marketing of Aruba abroad may soften the decline in tourism, and
government spending on infrastructure and other community projects should provide jobs
(temporarily) for the construction sector. The government has already allocated an additional
US$10 million to market Aruba abroad. AHATA (Aruba Hotel & Tourism Association) will allocate
more money for marketing. The cooperation between the public and private sector, and the
commitment of both sectors is essential to avoid a moderate to severe recession.


ps...they can show up to St Louis with their "marketing"...but I can guarantee you...my little Monkey and I will be there this weekend with a little "marketing" of our own...thanks to Vicky and some great materials by John. With any luck,  they will turn tail and run just like they did last year!!

NO JUSTICE FOR NATALEE, NO TOURISTS FOR ARUBA

I Always have, and always will Stand With The Girl!
Thanks Lisa for going to the Show and Standing with the Girl!  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 29, 2009, 10:54:55 PM
Respect works both ways.  If I agree with you then everything is fine, but if I don't, then............well.....I know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 10:55:19 PM
Blue Moon,

But I don't think the files will ever be turned over to the family.  At least not before everything is scrubbed from them.

JMO and yes, I know the family filed in court to have these files but so did the Sloots to keep the FBI out and guess what?  Guess who won that one even with the PM and judge saying the FBI could have access?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: San on January 29, 2009, 10:55:41 PM
Goodnight Everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 29, 2009, 10:56:50 PM


I am also a Monkey that has always respected Klaas. I don't talk behind peoples' back and Klaas will tell you when I have had a beef with her, I have gone straight to her with the beef. Whether we agree on matters or not, I think that Klaas will attest that I have always shown her respect. I know nothing about the chat and grumble...not even sure of what it is called...nor what caused the rift between Monkeys...I just walked back into the forum when it was happening and got lumped in with it. I don't back stab, I don't "hidey hole"...and everything I have disagreed with I have been honest and open about, then I get bashed for being honest and open with it.

Thats all I have to say. It's just...well...seeing e-mails and gossip being passed along behind the scenes and then brought here to the forum...I am sorry and I know most of you don't agree with me, but it just makes me mistrust the messenger and the message even more. I have explained my reasons why, you don't have to agree...but please, don't draw me into the shit that is going on behind the scenes. I am open and honest about who I speak to and in regards to what.

LDSTLOU (Lisa) has never been affraid to come directly to me via email, this is true. She is also free to have her opinion of Kermit and Kermit's posts.  I may not agree with Lisa but I respect her tight to her own opinion.

Sorry...little Monkey is supposed to be sleeping...had to go tuck him in.

Thank you Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 29, 2009, 10:57:19 PM
Goodnight Everyone.

Goodnight San.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:57:44 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.
[/quote]

I saw it too Magnolia, disgusting cowardly comments by someone who is very insecure, and jealous.  

They actually weren't nearly as hateful about San as they were about me, but then again...I think they are probably skeeeeeeeerrrrrrd of San!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


[/quote]

I know TM.  She has been hateful to me too.
I think they are mad because they were all so wrong
and let their pride and egos drag them down.
[/quote]

I agree Magnolia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 10:58:14 PM
Blue Moon,

But I don't think the files will ever be turned over to the family.  At least not before everything is scrubbed from them.

JMO and yes, I know the family filed in court to have these files but so did the Sloots to keep the FBI out and guess what?  Guess who won that one even with the PM and judge saying the FBI could have access?

I know the family will never see those files (or what's left of them).  That's why I hate them all (as robots used to say).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 10:58:37 PM

Goodnight San!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 29, 2009, 10:59:41 PM
http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=67407

Cooperation Is Essential To Avoid Severe Recession


January 28th 2009, Aruba.


ORANJESTAD-The economy of Aruba is about to enter a period of contraction, this is mainly
attributed to the global credit crisis. The Central Bank of Aruba (CBA) is expecting a decrease of
1.2 percent in Real GDP for 2009. Aruba will experience its second recession in just 5 years in what
is to be a decade of relatively low economic growth.

There may be a decline in investments from the private sector in large projects on the island, this
as a consequence of the difficulty for foreign investors to receive loans from banks. In addition the
number of tourist arrivals is expected to decline between 5.6 and 6.1 percent in 2009. The decline
in tourist arrivals may result in the contraction of tourism receipts by 2 percent.

Value of imported goods from abroad is expected to decline by 6.9 percent. The value of exported
goods to other countries in the World is expected to decline by 10.6 percent in 2009. The annual
inflation rate is expected to decline from 8.5 percent in 2008 to 4.2 percent in 2009, which is
considered a positive trend by CBA. The value of consumed goods on the island is expected to
increase by 0.6 percent.

Substantial and aggressive marketing of Aruba abroad may soften the decline in tourism, and
government spending on infrastructure and other community projects should provide jobs
(temporarily) for the construction sector. The government has already allocated an additional
US$10 million to market Aruba abroad. AHATA (Aruba Hotel & Tourism Association) will allocate
more money for marketing. The cooperation between the public and private sector, and the
commitment of both sectors is essential to avoid a moderate to severe recession.


ps...they can show up to St Louis with their "marketing"...but I can guarantee you...my little Monkey and I will be there this weekend with a little "marketing" of our own...thanks to Vicky and some great materials by John. With any luck,  they will turn tail and run just like they did last year!!

NO JUSTICE FOR NATALEE, NO TOURISTS FOR ARUBA

I Always have, and always will Stand With The Girl!
Thanks Lisa for going to the Show and Standing with the Girl!  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::

It's my pleasure. We had a ball last year...I am sure this year will be fun too!!
Aruba lady was so embarrassed by all the talk about the protest she went to her hidey hole!! lol Everyone we gave fliers and totes to had nothing but the kindest words to say. They remember!!! It's a heart warming experience for me.

Good Luck in LA too!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 29, 2009, 11:00:04 PM
Nite, San, Sleep tight!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 11:00:06 PM
Hi San!!!

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed ya.

Janet



Hi Janet how are you.

I'm here reading along.

Were you logged in?  Why the silence?

::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

Yes I am logged in.  I don't know why I'm quiet.  I guess that should be a good thing  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.

I saw it too Magnolia, disgusting cowardly comments by someone who is very insecure, and jealous.  

They actually weren't nearly as hateful about San as they were about me, but then again...I think they are probably skeeeeeeeerrrrrrd of San!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Hi ... I'm back.  Hubby wants to finish the chapter he is reading.

Where are all you reading the CnG posts?

I can just imagine what they are saying about me.

I can't tell you it does not hurt ... it does.  Hey ... these are Monkeys who we have posted beside for a long time in the question to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

When the Refugees afforded me a thread called TAMIKOSBUM ... I laughted.  Hey ... Refugess are Beth Hating trolls.  However ... being bashed at CnG is a different story.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Anyways ... I will not let the CnG situation distract me from my current mission ... current mission to keep John Silvetti's betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family from becoming a non-issue.

Janet 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 29, 2009, 11:00:33 PM
Good night all.
Keep up the good fight!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 11:01:02 PM
Good night san :) sleep well


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 11:02:17 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::

Well perk up, San.  It is hard for me to call them all a POS
by myself. ::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

I like when you call them all a POS.  It shows you pay attention to me.  ::MonkeyHaHa::
[/quote]

I learned half of what I know from you, San.
I saw where some of the C&G POSs said unkind things about you.
It really hurt my feelings.  Don't let them get to you.  Get your guns out.
[/quote]

I saw it too Magnolia, disgusting cowardly comments by someone who is very insecure, and jealous.  

They actually weren't nearly as hateful about San as they were about me, but then again...I think they are probably skeeeeeeeerrrrrrd of San!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


[/quote]

I know TM.  She has been hateful to me too.
I think they are mad because they were all so wrong
and let their pride and egos drag them down.
[/quote]


I believe that is a HUGE part of the problem right there.  Misdirected anger over being fooled so very badly.

And yes, if I recall, the prevailing theory was a party attended by the likes of Jossy and Julia was where Natalee died, not at the hands of Joran van der Sloot who only came back around for disposal of remains.

Wasn't that the last version or did it change again after that?  I could never keep up with the daily shifts in "information" being disseminated.
A party where a video was made by Julia and Jossy attended amont a host of others.  Not Joran at all and poor Joran was just left with having to dispose of the remains.

If that's not protecting Sloots, I don't know what is.

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 11:03:01 PM
Good night all.
Keep up the good fight!!

Good Nite and good luck at the show.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 11:11:51 PM
Janet,
It wasn't at C & G, it was at another open site; for all to read.

What provokes so much hatred from someone who doesn't know me at all...is beyond me.

I can only believe it is insecurity and jealousy on their part.

God knows my heart, that's all that matters.

I'm here for Natalee and her family; that's what it's about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 11:11:57 PM
Respect works both ways.  If I agree with you then everything is fine, but if I don't, then............well.....I know.


It does, Snoopy.  One can't be trashing other posters and not expect some of it to splat back on them. 

But even getting the facts straight would be an improvement.

JMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 11:13:20 PM
Good night all.
Keep up the good fight!!

Nite Lisa


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 29, 2009, 11:14:55 PM
Calling it a night.  Have to work all weekend. Not looking forward to it.  Guess I am lucky to be saying that though.  Too many people without jobs for me to be complaining.

Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 11:16:37 PM
Blue Moon,

But I don't think the files will ever be turned over to the family.  At least not before everything is scrubbed from them.

JMO and yes, I know the family filed in court to have these files but so did the Sloots to keep the FBI out and guess what?  Guess who won that one even with the PM and judge saying the FBI could have access?

I know the family will never see those files (or what's left of them).  That's why I hate them all (as robots used to say).

Growing Frustration in Aruba
Wednesday, July 06, 2005


GEORGE "JUG" TWITTY: Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2


The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there.


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for December 1
updated 7:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 11:16:43 PM
Janet,
It wasn't at C & G, it was at another open site; for all to read.

What provokes so much hatred from someone who doesn't know me at all...is beyond me.

I can only believe it is insecurity and jealousy on their part.

God knows my heart, that's all that matters.

I'm here for Natalee and her family; that's what it's about.


That's what can be so shocking with some of these posters.  How can they HATE so much someone they don't even know.

I always wondered what a dirtbag was exactly.  A bag of dirt.  Like a sandbag?  Or like the bag in a vacuum cleaner.   That is a bag that is dirty for sure.

But I am sure only complimentary things would be said about me, as usual, lol.

But now some of you who may not have known in the past can know how very little it takes for some haters to lash out at you, startling at times.  I used to think people had to have a reason but I now know for a fact that they don't.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 11:17:23 PM
Janet,
It wasn't at C & G, it was at another open site; for all to read.

What provokes so much hatred from someone who doesn't know me at all...is beyond me.

I can only believe it is insecurity and jealousy on their part.

God knows my heart, that's all that matters.

I'm here for Natalee and her family; that's what it's about.

What site?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 11:17:53 PM
Calling it a night.  Have to work all weekend. Not looking forward to it.  Guess I am lucky to be saying that though.  Too many people without jobs for me to be complaining.

Blue Moon

Goodnight Blue Moon!  Sorry you have to work the weekend.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 11:20:50 PM
Janet,
It wasn't at C & G, it was at another open site; for all to read.

What provokes so much hatred from someone who doesn't know me at all...is beyond me.

I can only believe it is insecurity and jealousy on their part.

God knows my heart, that's all that matters.

I'm here for Natalee and her family; that's what it's about.

What site?

Janet

goldmonkeys


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 11:22:12 PM
Janet,
It wasn't at C & G, it was at another open site; for all to read.

What provokes so much hatred from someone who doesn't know me at all...is beyond me.

I can only believe it is insecurity and jealousy on their part.

God knows my heart, that's all that matters.

I'm here for Natalee and her family; that's what it's about.

What site?

Janet


Yeah, what site?

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 29, 2009, 11:22:54 PM
Janet,
It wasn't at C & G, it was at another open site; for all to read.

What provokes so much hatred from someone who doesn't know me at all...is beyond me.

I can only believe it is insecurity and jealousy on their part.

God knows my heart, that's all that matters.

I'm here for Natalee and her family; that's what it's about.

What site?

Janet

goldmonkeys


Thanks texasmom.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 29, 2009, 11:24:27 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.

I may be being petty but one would think.You go as a team and you return as a team unless of an Emergency!JMOO

IIRC correctly Kyle flew in to Aruba to join the Persistence originally.
Just jumping in as I still have a lot more reading to catch up...
FWIW...
It is very common that specific specialists fly to and from shipboard assignments for a few reasons...
1. There is a limited space for the ship's crew, limited supplies, limited food, etc...all about costs required to operate the ship....excess specialists take up room and consumables if they are onboard.
2. specific experts are usually in high demand and lose money riding ships during long transits.
3. specialists are sometimes viewed by the ships crew as nerds....they are only focused on their specialties and can't contribute much to ships operations.
4. Specialists get in the way during emergencies...becoming a liability during emergencies...
5. Did I mention-they can be a real pain in the a$$ about how smart they are because their "specialists".
..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 29, 2009, 11:24:29 PM
LMAOOO wonder how many lil nosies hit thier noses on the screen to read that...hahahaha I imagined many. How many are mumblin "oh no she didnt!! " lmaooo sorry tired, stuff hittin me funny....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 29, 2009, 11:25:13 PM
Does anyone else think Dave Holloway may have referred this whole wild and ridiculous mess to his attorney Helen L because he simply did not want to even try to deal with it?

Remember, all Dave had to do was come down and collect the body and all that utter nonsense?

I have done this to people trying to sell me investments, annoying the crap out of me, etc.  Tell them to discuss with my attorney.

Last time I saw Dave on TV he was having chest pains, if I recall correctly.  No wonder he changed his phone number.  Bet other family members are considering doing the same. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 11:28:10 PM
LMAOOO wonder how many lil nosies hit thier noses on the screen to read that...hahahaha I imagined many. How many are mumblin "oh no she didnt!! " lmaooo sorry tired, stuff hittin me funny....

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 29, 2009, 11:29:44 PM
KTF,

I don't think Kyle stayed behind but flew directly home from Aruba to wherever he lives.

Don't know about Silvetti but Kyle did post about flying home.

No, I don't have links to anything.  I just 'member it.

I may be being petty but one would think.You go as a team and you return as a team unless of an Emergency!JMOO

IIRC correctly Kyle flew in to Aruba to join the Persistence originally.
Just jumping in as I still have a lot more reading to catch up...
FWIW...
It is very common that specific specialists fly to and from shipboard assignments for a few reasons...
1. There is a limited space for the ship's crew, limited supplies, limited food, etc...all about costs required to operate the ship....excess specialists take up room and consumables if they are onboard.
2. specific experts are usually in high demand and lose money riding ships during long transits.
3. specialists are sometimes viewed by the ships crew as nerds....they are only focused on their specialties and can't contribute much to ships operations.
4. Specialists get in the way during emergencies...becoming a liability during emergencies...
5. Did I mention-they can be a real pain in the a$$ about how smart they are because their "specialists".
..... ::MonkeyCool::

That's okay, billb.  You are only about 5 hours behind.  just kidding.  Thanks for this info.  IIRC, OE posted something about staff changes during the endeavor.  I would have to look for the specific post.  It seems logical that some would leave and others take their place, most probably flying to Aruba to board the ship.  jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 29, 2009, 11:32:05 PM
Does anyone else think Dave Holloway may have referred this whole wild and ridiculous mess to his attorney Helen L because he simply did not want to even try to deal with it?

Remember, all Dave had to do was come down and collect the body and all that utter nonsense?

I have done this to people trying to sell me investments, annoying the crap out of me, etc.  Tell them to discuss with my attorney.

Last time I saw Dave on TV he was having chest pains, if I recall correctly.  No wonder he changed his phone number.  Bet other family members are considering doing the same. 

Good possibility Anna, bless his heart.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 29, 2009, 11:34:16 PM
Does anyone else think Dave Holloway may have referred this whole wild and ridiculous mess to his attorney Helen L because he simply did not want to even try to deal with it?

Remember, all Dave had to do was come down and collect the body and all that utter nonsense?

I have done this to people trying to sell me investments, annoying the crap out of me, etc.  Tell them to discuss with my attorney.

Last time I saw Dave on TV he was having chest pains, if I recall correctly.  No wonder he changed his phone number.  Bet other family members are considering doing the same. 

Bingo.  I'm sure Dave has had it up to here with all of the twists and turns and false info/leads in this case.  Tired of getting constant emails and phone calls from people that think they know it all.  I cannot imaging what Dave and Beth have had to endure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 11:49:29 PM

I agree, but I think it is more like ALL of them instead of just "some". These are not bad people ( they want justice for Natalee - just like us). I think they have been horribly mislead.

Misled or not.  They cannot be given a free pass.  Bottom Line:  They are indirectly  participants in John Silvette's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

I cannot comprehend the mentality.  All those who now upholding John Silvetti, Kyle Kingman or Tim Trahan would be taking an entirely different position if there had been a possibility that their loved one could have been in that trap/cage.  I believe condemnation would be where it was at if ... the opportunity to bring their loved one home may have been lost forever.

Janet

____

REMINDER:

THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION - JOHN SILVETTI


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


BUMP

In my own opinion the Persistence must remain of great interest to the search for JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!We will never know what was in that trap because of John Silvetti in my opinion.If you can't deduce that logically from Kyle's own words i'm sorry!Just my opinion.


KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 29, 2009, 11:50:54 PM
Good Evening to all the Monkeys,as well as the 32 Monkeys Lurking! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:01:08 AM
Good Evening to all the Monkeys,as well as the 32 Monkeys Lurking! ::MonkeyCool::

Good evening Mr. KTF!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 30, 2009, 12:01:10 AM
wow!!! 32?? lol wonder if there are extra extra special privilages for that, like access to a new and improved under UNDERbelly... lol
copy copy copy carry carry copy copy...Ohhh rawhideee!!

yeah i know privilages is spelled wrong but i have no idea where spell thingy is on this and too tired to look. lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:04:36 AM
wow!!! 32?? lol wonder if there are extra extra special privilages for that, like access to a new and improved under UNDERbelly... lol
copy copy copy carry carry copy copy...Ohhh rawhideee!!

yeah i know privilages is spelled wrong but i have no idea where spell thingy is on this and too tired to look. lol

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:10:11 AM
I really doubt very seriously that they have 32 members left if they ever had that many at all.  jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:12:55 AM
http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://www.awemainta.com/home/images/stories/headlines/jan09/Front(15).jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 30, 2009, 12:15:16 AM
TM...They have 51...oh wait..i was banned im sure by now lol..so 50..oh wait so was tib...so 49..wow they better recruit more POS, oh wait, they wont be able to now prolly...oh woe is me...ooops.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 30, 2009, 12:15:25 AM
Good night ospainter, Seamonkey, texasmom, rjdeer, Magnolia, Icehawk, hotping, Anna, Artcolley, 2NJSons_Mom, Mere, klaasend, Lifesong, truthseeker2 and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
Lots of stuff revealed about the CnG clan.......and the depth of the cover up machine protecting vdsloots...follow the money is ALWAYS the right path...... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 30, 2009, 12:16:33 AM
Good night ospainter, Seamonkey, texasmom, rjdeer, Magnolia, Icehawk, hotping, Anna, Artcolley, 2NJSons_Mom, Mere, klaasend, Lifesong, truthseeker2 and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
Lots of stuff revealed about the CnG clan.......and the depth of the cover up machine protecting vdsloots...follow the money is ALWAYS the right path...... ::MonkeyCool::

NIte BillB, sweet Dreams


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 30, 2009, 12:17:58 AM
Good night ospainter, Seamonkey, texasmom, rjdeer, Magnolia, Icehawk, hotping, Anna, Artcolley, 2NJSons_Mom, Mere, klaasend, Lifesong, truthseeker2 and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
Lots of stuff revealed about the CnG clan.......and the depth of the cover up machine protecting vdsloots...follow the money is ALWAYS the right path...... ::MonkeyCool::

Nite billb

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:18:26 AM
Good night ospainter, Seamonkey, texasmom, rjdeer, Magnolia, Icehawk, hotping, Anna, Artcolley, 2NJSons_Mom, Mere, klaasend, Lifesong, truthseeker2 and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
Lots of stuff revealed about the CnG clan.......and the depth of the cover up machine protecting vdsloots...follow the money is ALWAYS the right path...... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 30, 2009, 12:19:54 AM
Night Night Bill, sleep well :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:20:13 AM
Good night ospainter, Seamonkey, texasmom, rjdeer, Magnolia, Icehawk, hotping, Anna, Artcolley, 2NJSons_Mom, Mere, klaasend, Lifesong, truthseeker2 and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
Lots of stuff revealed about the CnG clan.......and the depth of the cover up machine protecting vdsloots...follow the money is ALWAYS the right path...... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight BillB


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:21:55 AM
Good Evening to all the Monkeys,as well as the 32 Monkeys Lurking! ::MonkeyCool::

Good evening Mr. KTF!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::

Good Evening TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:23:58 AM
TM,

Is that Nels Oduber in the center smashing that guitar?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Isn't he a little old for that sort of thing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 30, 2009, 12:24:20 AM
Night KTF :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:25:20 AM
TM,

Is that Nels Oduber in the center smashing that guitar?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Isn't he a little old for that sort of thing?

yep, I thought so too...anything for votes I guess.   ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 12:28:27 AM
TM,

Is that Nels Oduber in the center smashing that guitar?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Isn't he a little old for that sort of thing?

Good eye.....I had to go back and look, again, because I just saw the guitar smashing the first time.  Wonder who the other two are? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:28:52 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 30, 2009, 12:29:07 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:29:07 AM
Night KTF :)

Goodnight SeaMonkey! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 12:31:49 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



We can add that to our wish list of spreadsheets, evidence, PV's, etc.  It would be nice to see it itemized, heh?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:32:32 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 12:33:36 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Someone should tell him the comb over from ear to ear isn't cutting it...   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:35:05 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



With the way they operate Anna!The AHATA board probably pocketed most of it and used the rest to pay the internet trolls 5 U.S. Dollars and HR with FREE drinks and Carlos-N-Charlie's include! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:35:49 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



We can add that to our wish list of spreadsheets, evidence, PV's, etc.  It would be nice to see it itemized, heh?


Yes, but I reject out of hand the F-16's as that was so obviously a training mission and is certainly not an acceptable method for searching for one missing person.

After that is removed, I am sure the amount would drop away down.  I also don't accept U.S. owned hotels providing discounts as that is not Aruban at all.

So where did all that money go I have to wonder?  They sure didn't get any results.  I can't imagine what ALE would be doing on overtime that could even credibly be considered as work.

Lots of it must have gone for extras and decoys as they called them at first.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 30, 2009, 12:37:21 AM
Im confused...i thought ktf was goin to bed lolol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:37:35 AM
TM,

Is that Nels Oduber in the center smashing that guitar?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Isn't he a little old for that sort of thing?

Good eye.....I had to go back and look, again, because I just saw the guitar smashing the first time.  Wonder who the other two are? 

I'm pretty sure one of them is Hamish Dodds, CEO of Hard Rock International.  (The white haired, balding one)  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:38:27 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Someone should tell him the comb over from ear to ear isn't cutting it...   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:38:31 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



With the way they operate Anna!The AHATA board probably pocketed most of it and used the rest to pay the internet trolls 5 U.S. Dollars and HR with FREE drinks and Carlos-N-Charlie's include! ::MonkeyCool::


Don't forget the on-the-job eating of Frosted Flakes and shaving at work, too.  That is bound to add time to the clock daily.  And some of those cops appear to have spent a lot of time eating their Frosties.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 30, 2009, 12:38:38 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Someone should tell him the comb over from ear to ear isn't cutting it...   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 12:38:57 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



We can add that to our wish list of spreadsheets, evidence, PV's, etc.  It would be nice to see it itemized, heh?


Yes, but I reject out of hand the F-16's as that was so obviously a training mission and is certainly not an acceptable method for searching for one missing person.

After that is removed, I am sure the amount would drop away down.  I also don't accept U.S. owned hotels providing discounts as that is not Aruban at all.

So where did all that money go I have to wonder?  They sure didn't get any results.  I can't imagine what ALE would be doing on overtime that could even credibly be considered as work.

Lots of it must have gone for extras and decoys as they called them at first.



Wonder if the specialists and inspectors from NL, including lodging and transportation comes into that figure? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 12:39:53 AM
Does anyone else think Dave Holloway may have referred this whole wild and ridiculous mess to his attorney Helen L because he simply did not want to even try to deal with it?

Remember, all Dave had to do was come down and collect the body and all that utter nonsense?

I have done this to people trying to sell me investments, annoying the crap out of me, etc.  Tell them to discuss with my attorney.

Last time I saw Dave on TV he was having chest pains, if I recall correctly.  No wonder he changed his phone number.  Bet other family members are considering doing the same. 

Bingo.  I'm sure Dave has had it up to here with all of the twists and turns and false info/leads in this case.  Tired of getting constant emails and phone calls from people that think they know it all.  I cannot imaging what Dave and Beth have had to endure.

Like getting a tip for he and Tim Miller to check out (on a beach, out of the country) during a critical stage in the Persistence ocean search...
 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:42:51 AM
Im confused...i thought ktf was goin to bed lolol

I will be shortly.I told BillB goodnight.Thought you were going to bed. ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 30, 2009, 12:50:28 AM
KTF oh... ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 12:53:00 AM
http://awemainta.com/home/

1/30/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01302009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

mei-mei of one cantidad big of invitado y contando cu presencia of the ceo of hard rock cafe corporation, owing to open the first restaurant of hard rock cafe at aruba. we t’e first in caribe dutch for can have one hard rock cafe. claro cu the restaurant will percura for atrae turistanan of one segmento cu probably aruba not owing to explora completo still. the is one mark good conoci rond world y cu one cantidad of fanatico cu is bishite at where cu they bay. at ocasion of aperture, siguiendo one tradicion of hard rock cafe, owing to break not one neither two, but three guitar on the stage principal in the establecimiento new situa fast radisson hotel. have to tell cu the near internacional “the aboriginal wailers” owing to come aruba for present y deleita the invitadonan cu musica.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:55:18 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Someone should tell him the comb over from ear to ear isn't cutting it...   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance::


They never do, do they!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 12:55:43 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



With the way they operate Anna!The AHATA board probably pocketed most of it and used the rest to pay the internet trolls 5 U.S. Dollars and HR with FREE drinks and Carlos-N-Charlie's include! ::MonkeyCool::


Don't forget the on-the-job eating of Frosted Flakes and shaving at work, too.  That is bound to add time to the clock daily.  And some of those cops appear to have spent a lot of time eating their Frosties.



Don't forget about the whole island taking off a day to search for Natalee...
Everything the volunteers found went to the bottomless drawer in Jacob's office...

Volunteer: Here, I think this material is like that girl's shirt on the news...
ALE: Nah, give it here, just fishing net...I will turn it over to be tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Volunteer: Oh my gosh, I think I found a bone...
ALE: Lokks like a done bone. Give it here, I will have it tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Volunteer: Look! A bloody mattress. WTF
ALE: No worries...Just dog blood...
Volunteer: But I heard the Vandersloot's have a furniture delivery truck outside their house...
ALE: Not related to this case... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Also, do not forget about the rock painters. They probably cost a fortune... ::MonkeyConfused::

Then, they are probably factoring in the hush money, too.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Next, high-tech radar to monitor all boat traffic gets pretty expensive. Oh yeah, wasn't working that night... ::MonkeyShocked::

Hans Mos said that Dr. Phil would be reimbursing them for their expenses. They are in Deepak's expense log... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tylergal on January 30, 2009, 12:57:51 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?


99% of it was spent on lying liars and disinformation. Hi, Anna, longtime no see. I miss you and Klaas, None and San.  Where are they?  Where is CBB?  Just dropping by to say Hello.  None, if you and San get by or CBB, know that I miss you as i do Anna and Klaas.  Where is the big boss, Mr. Red?  Oh, I love Mrs. Red.  Is she out buying shoes.  I hope if she is, she sticks a heel in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:58:16 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



With the way they operate Anna!The AHATA board probably pocketed most of it and used the rest to pay the internet trolls 5 U.S. Dollars and HR with FREE drinks and Carlos-N-Charlie's include! ::MonkeyCool::


Don't forget the on-the-job eating of Frosted Flakes and shaving at work, too.  That is bound to add time to the clock daily.  And some of those cops appear to have spent a lot of time eating their Frosties.



Don't forget about the whole island taking off a day to search for Natalee...
Everything the volunteers found went to the bottomless drawer in Jacob's office...

Volunteer: Here, I think this material is like that girl's shirt on the news...
ALE: Nah, give it here, just fishing net...I will turn it over to be tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Volunteer: Oh my gosh, I think I found a bone...
ALE: Lokks like a done bone. Give it here, I will have it tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Volunteer: Look! A bloody mattress. WTF
ALE: No worries...Just dog blood...
Volunteer: But I heard the Vandersloot's have a furniture delivery truck outside their house...
ALE: Not related to this case... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Also, do not forget about the rock painters. They probably cost a fortune... ::MonkeyConfused::

Then, they are probably factoring in the hush money, too.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Next, high-tech radar to monitor all boat traffic gets pretty expensive. Oh yeah, wasn't working that night... ::MonkeyShocked::

Hans Mos said that Dr. Phil would be reimbursing them for their expenses. They are in Deepak's expense log... ::MonkeyWink::

You got em pegged BuckShot! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 12:58:53 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



With the way they operate Anna!The AHATA board probably pocketed most of it and used the rest to pay the internet trolls 5 U.S. Dollars and HR with FREE drinks and Carlos-N-Charlie's include! ::MonkeyCool::


Don't forget the on-the-job eating of Frosted Flakes and shaving at work, too.  That is bound to add time to the clock daily.  And some of those cops appear to have spent a lot of time eating their Frosties.



Don't forget about the whole island taking off a day to search for Natalee...
Everything the volunteers found went to the bottomless drawer in Jacob's office...


Volunteer: Here, I think this material is like that girl's shirt on the news...
ALE: Nah, give it here, just fishing net...I will turn it over to be tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Volunteer: Oh my gosh, I think I found a bone...
ALE: Looks like a donkey bone. Give it here, I will have it tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Volunteer: Look! A bloody mattress. WTF
ALE: No worries...Just dog blood...
Volunteer: But I heard the Vandersloot's have a furniture delivery truck outside their house...
ALE: Not related to this case... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Also, do not forget about the rock painters. They probably cost a fortune... ::MonkeyConfused::

Then, they are probably factoring in the hush money, too.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Next, high-tech radar to monitor all boat traffic gets pretty expensive. Oh yeah, wasn't working that night... ::MonkeyShocked::

Hans Mos said that Dr. Phil would be reimbursing them for their expenses. They are in Deepak's expense log... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 30, 2009, 12:59:16 AM
Nels Oduber is  getting in touch with his inner "fossiled out flower child"   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Someone should tell him the comb over from ear to ear isn't cutting it...   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance::


They never do, do they!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

NO! and those Combovers always look so foolish, like nobody will notice they are going bald?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 30, 2009, 01:00:47 AM
TYLERGAL!!!

HI!  How have you been?????? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: ospainter on January 30, 2009, 01:03:44 AM
Hi Tyler

How are you?

It is so nice to see you.

OS



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 01:06:14 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?


99% of it was spent on lying liars and disinformation. Hi, Anna, longtime no see. I miss you and Klaas, None and San.  Where are they?  Where is CBB?  Just dropping by to say Hello.  None, if you and San get by or CBB, know that I miss you as i do Anna and Klaas.  Where is the big boss, Mr. Red?  Oh, I love Mrs. Red.  Is she out buying shoes.  I hope if she is, she sticks a heel in Aruba.

Hi Tylergal!  I'm here, San was here earlier and CBB has been hanging out mostly in the Caylee Anthony thread, she's there right now. 

Red has been busy as has Mrs. Red but of course they are still around. 

Always good to see you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 01:07:22 AM
Hi, Tylergal.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:12:15 AM
HT Carpe

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpeNhhuuhuhuhuh-1.png)

Where is Carpe?  I hope he's not over in Chatter&GrumblerLand !  If he is, somebody seriously drugged him and took him to a place he would never go on his own!  I'd like to know what Carpe would have to say about the revelations concerning the Persistence; but I bet it might curl my ears.  I miss him.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 01:15:14 AM
Carpe posted on the front page of SM a couple days ago, first time I've seen him ANYWHERE in forever.  As far as I know he's not at CnG.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:20:51 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


NOTHING MORE.NOTHING LESS.           ::MonkeyRoll::       JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:21:13 AM
Carpe posted on the front page of SM a couple days ago, first time I've seen him ANYWHERE in forever.  As far as I know he's not at CnG.

Thanks Klaas!  That's a relief!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Calling Carpe...Carpe come home!!!!!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:22:25 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


NOTHING MORE.NOTHING LESS.           ::MonkeyRoll::       JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

Thanks KTF, I was just about to start looking for tonights pic.  You're right!  That's what it's all about!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:22:42 AM
40 YRS AND 1 DAY IF THAT'S WHAT IT TAKES.I WILL GO TO EVERYONE OF THE POS FUNERALS IF I LIVE LONGER THEN ANY OF THEM.GOD WILLING!WE WILL NEVER,EVER FORGET ARUBA... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:25:27 AM
40 YRS AND 1 DAY IF THAT'S WHAT IT TAKES.I WILL GO TO EVERYONE OF THE POS FUNERALS IF I LIVE LONGER THEN ANY OF THEM.GOD WILLING!WE WILL NEVER,EVER FORGET ARUBA... ::MonkeyCool::

This might be a little harsh but let me entertain the thought for a minute.Anywhere from 30 to 40 Monkeys at all of the Major players funeral's if God allows us the privilege of living longer then those POS.I'll rent my monkey suit! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:25:49 AM
Does anyone else ever wonder just how much of this ten million Aruba is always whining about and claiming to have spent was spent on disinformation agents and subterfuge?



With the way they operate Anna!The AHATA board probably pocketed most of it and used the rest to pay the internet trolls 5 U.S. Dollars and HR with FREE drinks and Carlos-N-Charlie's include! ::MonkeyCool::

You're sooooo right Buckshot!   ::MonkeyCool::
Don't forget the on-the-job eating of Frosted Flakes and shaving at work, too.  That is bound to add time to the clock daily.  And some of those cops appear to have spent a lot of time eating their Frosties.



Don't forget about the whole island taking off a day to search for Natalee...
Everything the volunteers found went to the bottomless drawer in Jacob's office...

Volunteer: Here, I think this material is like that girl's shirt on the news...
ALE: Nah, give it here, just fishing net...I will turn it over to be tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Volunteer: Oh my gosh, I think I found a bone...
ALE: Lokks like a done bone. Give it here, I will have it tested... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Volunteer: Look! A bloody mattress. WTF
ALE: No worries...Just dog blood...
Volunteer: But I heard the Vandersloot's have a furniture delivery truck outside their house...
ALE: Not related to this case... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Also, do not forget about the rock painters. They probably cost a fortune... ::MonkeyConfused::

Then, they are probably factoring in the hush money, too.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Next, high-tech radar to monitor all boat traffic gets pretty expensive. Oh yeah, wasn't working that night... ::MonkeyShocked::

Hans Mos said that Dr. Phil would be reimbursing them for their expenses. They are in Deepak's expense log... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:27:23 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:28:43 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 01:30:39 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

stackaholic needs to added to Webster's dictionary (with a pic of billb next to it)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:31:01 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

billb is probably up there in the rafters...and caused the whole thing!!!!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:32:06 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

stackaholic needs to added to Webster's dictionary (with a pic of billb next to it)


I agree!!!!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:37:09 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

stackaholic needs to added to Webster's dictionary (with a pic of billb next to it)

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 01:42:53 AM


Goodnight monkeys! 

Thanks for the laughs, there were many tonight...it's good to laugh.

Every night when I get ready to leave, it makes me sad that another day has passed...and no Natalee, no Justice. 

But I've got to hold on to the hope that tomorrow just might be that day!

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!  NEVER GIVE UP!!!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:45:21 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


NOTHING MORE.NOTHING LESS.           ::MonkeyRoll::       JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

                   THANK YOU TM FOR ALL YOU'VE DONE,AS WELL AS DO.
                                       JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:48:40 AM
pinetucky, texasmom, Mere, spooky112483, klaasend, BUCKSHOT, hotping, Icehawk, Lifesong
I must hit the hay as well.Thanx to all the Monkey's for all you've done and will continue to do!

Goodnight and God Bless.Aruba.We won't forget!PERIOD.How ya like them Apples! ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 30, 2009, 01:54:29 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

billb is probably up there in the rafters...and caused the whole thing!!!!   ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
That hurts...but in a nice way.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 01:54:50 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 30, 2009, 01:55:24 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

stackaholic needs to added to Webster's dictionary (with a pic of billb next to it)

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Only id I get full credit...along with everyone else.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 30, 2009, 01:58:26 AM
My last post got sucked up in the quote stack!!!!   ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I wanted to say Buckshot....You're sooooo right!   ::MonkeyCool::

As long as you don't blame BillB for stackaholism TM! ::MonkeyHaHa::

stackaholic needs to added to Webster's dictionary (with a pic of billb next to it)

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Only if I get full credit...along with everyone else.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
Can't be too careless around here with your posts....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 02:00:19 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Goodnight, Klaas.

Thanks for all you do & putting up with all that goes with it.  God Bless!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 02:04:28 AM
Good Night All!

Justice for Natalee!

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 30, 2009, 02:05:55 AM
Good Night All!

Justice for Natalee!

 
Good night Hotping and the rest of you wild and crazy Monkeys.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tylergal on January 30, 2009, 02:53:51 AM
goodnight, all.  So good to see so many of our friends. It was just about this time 4 years ago that Natalee was thinking about approaching her mother and daddy about a trip to Aruba and thinking of all the fun she would have.  Such a short time in a lifetime but such a long time in a friendship.

Goodnight, Anna, San, Klaas, None, Art, Os and all those who love justice and especially those who have fought so hard for justice for those who had no one else to fight for them, e.g., Caylee and Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 06:22:53 AM
 :2waver: San..... I'll be hanging out here this morning. Fast approaching 50.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 06:24:16 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 06:31:24 AM
:2waver: San..... I'll be hanging out here this morning. Fast approaching 50.

Thanks Nut.  Have a good day I have to get ready for work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 06:34:12 AM
O / T ...just because I am bored>>

KUALA LUMPUR: The remains of a Malaysian woman who went missing in Thailand about a year ago were found in the septic tank of a house in the province of Ranong.

The skeletal remains of A. Fairos Ahmad Sulaiman, 37, was found in a cemented septic tank of the house where she had lived with her Dutch husband Lambertus Den Dulk @ Mohd Lufti Abdullah, and their three-year-old son, Johan Sebastian.
http://www.nst.com.my/Friday/Frontpage/2466119/Article/index_html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 06:53:36 AM
need to reboot


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 09:19:24 AM
Good morning Monks!  ::MonkeyCool::  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 09:40:16 AM
goodnight, all.  So good to see so many of our friends. It was just about this time 4 years ago that Natalee was thinking about approaching her mother and daddy about a trip to Aruba and thinking of all the fun she would have.  Such a short time in a lifetime but such a long time in a friendship.

Goodnight, Anna, San, Klaas, None, Art, Os and all those who love justice and especially those who have fought so hard for justice for those who had no one else to fight for them, e.g., Caylee and Natalee.

Hi Tyler-

I am here and have missed you very much! I hope you will come back soon and post more often and yes Tyler, some of us love justice. Some of us have watched our children's lives blossom over these last four years, while Natalee's family was deprived that joy. SM tries to keep the quest for justice moving forward for us all.

Please come back soon !!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:24:29 AM
O / T ...just because I am bored>>

KUALA LUMPUR: The remains of a Malaysian woman who went missing in Thailand about a year ago were found in the septic tank of a house in the province of Ranong.

The skeletal remains of A. Fairos Ahmad Sulaiman, 37, was found in a cemented septic tank of the house where she had lived with her Dutch husband Lambertus Den Dulk @ Mohd Lufti Abdullah, and their three-year-old son, Johan Sebastian.
http://www.nst.com.my/Friday/Frontpage/2466119/Article/index_html

Suicide?  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: vms on January 30, 2009, 10:24:32 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:27:03 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

Did Kermit ever say specifically they were SS, FBI or CIA?  Serious question, I really don't know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 10:29:07 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

How do you know that VMS?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: vms on January 30, 2009, 10:30:18 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

Did Kermit ever say specifically they were SS, FBI or CIA?  Serious question, I really don't know.

No, I don't think she did, Klaas. I do think people have assumed it and just trying to straighten out the misconception.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: vms on January 30, 2009, 10:31:51 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

How do you know that VMS?

The pictures are available for view on the internet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:36:04 AM
VMS - I'm not sure I understand you reasoning.  I know that watching the innaugeration there were secret service all over the place.  Especially when they took the train trip, standing outside the train.  So why couldn't there be photos available on the internet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 30, 2009, 10:36:49 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

How do you know that VMS?

The pictures are available for view on the internet.

OH, interesting!  So, I take it you know the people in the pictures that are available on the internet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:40:54 AM
VMS - I'm not sure I understand you reasoning.  I know that watching the innaugeration there were secret service all over the place.  Especially when they took the train trip, standing outside the train.  So why couldn't there be photos available on the internet?

Just googled this.  Photo labeled, Secret Service agents with Bill Clinton:

(http://pro.corbis.com/images/WL006861.jpg?size=67&uid=%7BBAC2CFCC-708B-4CE0-81C8-C1086E31D53E%7D)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: vms on January 30, 2009, 10:41:14 AM
VMS - I'm not sure I understand you reasoning.  I know that watching the innaugeration there were secret service all over the place.  Especially when they took the train trip, standing outside the train.  So why couldn't there be photos available on the internet?

Klaas,

Not that it matters, I just hate for people to continue to make that assumption.
If you want, I can email you the link and it is kind of self-explanatory from there. I don't feel comfortable posting it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 10:41:27 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

How do you know that VMS?

The pictures are available for view on the internet.

Wow! That is pretty clever.  Just let people assume.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:43:58 AM
Another googled image:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/610x.jpg)

18 months ago: Dignitaries, including former presidents and first ladies, attend funeral services for Lady Bird Johnson on Saturday, July 14, 2007, in Austin, Texas. In front are, from left, former first lady Nancy Reagan, former first lady Rosalynn Carter, former President Jimmy Carter, first lady Laura Bush, former President Bill Clinton, and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. In the second row, from left, are a Secret Service agent, Ed Schlossberg, his wife Caroline Kennedy, Barbara Bush, Susan Ford Bales, and another Secret Service agent. In the third row are a Secret Service agent, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Anita Perry, Maria Shriver, Trisha Nixon Cox, and her husband Ed Cox.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:45:11 AM
Sure email me the link please. 

smklaas@hotmail.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: vms on January 30, 2009, 10:48:03 AM
Sure email me the link please. 

smklaas@hotmail.com

Sent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 10:58:14 AM
vms, I saw you trying to discredit Kermit before he posted
any of the information that Kyle had posted at Freebirds.
Did you draw the short straw today to come and bash
Kermit?
It doesn't change Kyle's words and his failure to act
in Natalee's best interest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 11:01:50 AM
 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:07:02 AM
goodnight, all.  So good to see so many of our friends. It was just about this time 4 years ago that Natalee was thinking about approaching her mother and daddy about a trip to Aruba and thinking of all the fun she would have.  Such a short time in a lifetime but such a long time in a friendship.

Goodnight, Anna, San, Klaas, None, Art, Os and all those who love justice and especially those who have fought so hard for justice for those who had no one else to fight for them, e.g., Caylee and Natalee.


Tylergal,  Please come back and post often!

You are missed by many including me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:12:07 AM
HT Carpe

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpeNhhuuhuhuhuh-1.png)

Where is Carpe?  I hope he's not over in Chatter&GrumblerLand !  If he is, somebody seriously drugged him and took him to a place he would never go on his own!  I'd like to know what Carpe would have to say about the revelations concerning the Persistence; but I bet it might curl my ears.  I miss him.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

I believe that many Monkeys who are at CnG will come to the realization that all is not what it seems in the Land of OZ and ... will return to the cage.

A1 came home.

Janet

++++++


A1 ... I meant why were you a member of a forum the bashed Scared Monkeys ... bashed Klaas ... bashed those that were attempting to expose the truth ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... encompassing John Silvetti's betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

Why did you have to be banned prior to leaving?

A1 ... you know I love ya.  I just do not understand.

Janet


Gosh Janet, I dont know how to answer that.  That's why I havent said anything.  I truly thought the people who invited me there cared about me, I had talked to them on the phone, been invited to their homes.....Im sorry, I dont know how to answer that.  I love children, I want them found and brought home.  Thats why Im here, that's why I was there......that's the only answer I can give you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Vicki on January 30, 2009, 11:13:01 AM
::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones

Thank you Sharon for this...Isnt this why we are all here almost 4 years later???? PRAY for the boycotters this weekend in ST LOUIS....They are standing up for JUSTICE and Natalee...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Ree on January 30, 2009, 11:19:23 AM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:25:11 AM

I agree, but I think it is more like ALL of them instead of just "some". These are not bad people ( they want justice for Natalee - just like us). I think they have been horribly mislead.

Misled or not.  They cannot be given a free pass.  Bottom Line:  They are indirectly  participants in John Silvette's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

I cannot comprehend the mentality.  All those who now upholding John Silvetti, Kyle Kingman or Tim Trahan would be taking an entirely different position if there had been a possibility that their loved one could have been in that trap/cage.  I believe condemnation would be where it was at if ... the opportunity to bring their loved one home may have been lost forever.

Janet

____

REMINDER:

THE PERSISTENCE DECEPTION - JOHN SILVETTI


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


BUMP

In my own opinion the Persistence must remain of great interest to the search for JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!We will never know what was in that trap because of John Silvetti in my opinion.If you can't deduce that logically from Kyle's own words i'm sorry!Just my opinion.


KEEPTHEFAITH

Keepthefaith ... we are ... as "Anne of Green Gables" would say ... kindred spirits!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:30:49 AM
Does anyone know if any divers dived on any of the other targets, those other than the fish trap that only ALE had access to?

I don't mean with the ROV camera but actual live divers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: SS on January 30, 2009, 11:32:56 AM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.




Ree - I have presented facts.  Please check your facts.  I have not posted emails.  If you will check back through the threads, you will see that each of these statements are directly from posts made on SM in the NAH thread.  These are not emails.  I do not post emails.  These are SM discussions.

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
« Reply #440 on: January 29, 2009, 12:51:17 PM »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 6, 2009

Lifesong:
Kermit -

While you're here....

I think you may have missed this from a post I made on 12/18. The sentiments are important to me, so I've copied them over:


Quote

<snipped>

4. Kermit - Thank you for your service to our country. I mean it, Thank You. Thank you for your sacrifice, your dedication, and your hard work throughout the course of your career. Every president we elect is my president. Thanks also on behalf of my 12 year old daughter for continuing to break down and hold open the doors for women to advance professionally. Equality is still elusive, but you've made lasting contributions and that should also be acknowledged.

No response necessary, dear frog, just thank you!! (Monkey Wink)



Kermit:
Oh my goodness. Thank you. I had not seen that post. I'm humbled and I thank you for saying that. It means a lot.

January 02, 2009

ldstlou:
another legit question...so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for? Can you explain how


Kermit:
No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home.
A picture is worth a thousand words though.

January 3, 2009

Kermit wrote"
Good night monkeys, the pond awaits me tired frog legs.

I hope the posts help to clear up anything that may not be very clear up till now.

Thank you for your support Monkeys.
Thank you for the kind words.
Thank you for making me laugh when I wanted to .....well you know.

And thank you Patriot for your kind words, it touched my heart. It really did, in ways you don't know.
I've done a lot for our country, fighting the bad guys and exposing the truth you are the first person who said that to me. Means a lot. Thank you very much.

 "I can only tell you from my own experience, it's not like I knew what Kenneth Starr was going to do next"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:33:12 AM
Does anyone have any information that anyone other than ALE had actual access and took samples of the contents of the fish trap shown on Dateline?

Any clue at all that this was not the case?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:40:37 AM
So posting what you think is someone's life history/personal information and that of their children is OK but posting emails is not?

I think posting personal information is much worse, IMO.

It is the words of OE that create the problem, not who posted them.  Most of what was posted was also posted here in this forum.  We just didn't pay that much attention at the time except for a few alert monkeys.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:46:32 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

vms

What has Kermit's personal life have to do with the topic at hand ... Kyle Kingman's own words ... words that expose John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway ... words that imply that the opportunity to bring an American citizen home to rest on US soil was forever lost?

In a nutshell!  Kermit shared posts that Kyle Kingman submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site and ... the former administration (jen) of the Natalee's Freebirds' site confirmed those posts.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:[/b]  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 11:48:50 AM
So posting what you think is someone's life history/personal information and that of their children is OK but posting emails is not?

I think posting personal information is much worse, IMO.

It is the words of OE that create the problem, not who posted them.  Most of what was posted was also posted here in this forum.  We just didn't pay that much attention at the time except for a few alert monkeys.



I'm beginning to think we need a different thread for the moaners and the groaners to attack our posters on. It would help keep the focus on Natalee in this one. imo

It's not like our attacked posters can 'take the fight' over there  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Anna -- iirc -- the remaining 100+ targets were spotted (technical, aren't I) and then had ROV dives -- prior to being determined 'viable'.

None of them had live divers as the company apparently only had enough money to identify them as 'viable'.

Janet, or one of our much more organized than I Monkeys, can probably find a few quotes to that effect. Posted here, as well as some posts from BFN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 11:48:52 AM
Goood Morning Monkeys!The discredit Kermit campaign has started quite early this morning!

I'll ask again but i'm sure i'll get no answer again!Who is copying and pasting for CnG today??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 11:51:25 AM
So I am gathering that SS believes that Kermit was NOT an agent???


FTR, the pictures Kermit posted are not pictures of a Secret Service agent, FBI agent, CIA agent, or any other kind of agent.

vms

What has Kermit's personal life have to do with the topic at hand ... Kyle Kingman's own words ... words that expose John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway ... words that imply that the opportunity to bring an American citizen home to rest on US soil was forever lost?

In a nutshell!  Kermit shared posts that Kyle Kingman submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site and ... the former administration (jen) of the Natalee's Freebirds' site confirmed those posts.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:[/b]  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)

Great question Janet.It doesn't!The statements made by Kyle,as well as the Persistence are what they are.Not one person can change,manipulate,and or misconstrue what Kyle said! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 11:54:09 AM


I'm about to leave for the office, but I have a question and will check back later to hopefully see an answer.  It's a serious question, I'm not being nasty.  If the answer purports to go to credibility, I'll consider that BS.  IMO, Kermit's credibility was earned from the documentation of facts and is not dependent on gender or occupation so that just doesn't hold water. 


Can someone please explain to me what Kermit's gender or occupation has to do with Natalee Holloway, her vicious murder, and the government-sanctioned coverup thereof?

 
It just seems to me that good people are letting themselves be used as pawns to serve the purpose of some ex-monkey's twisted internet power-trip in trying to create a forum war and it has very, very little to do with the Natalee and/or her family.  Maybe if I can get a clear answer to this question I won't feel this way anymore.

Anyone?  Anyone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 12:01:46 PM


I'm about to leave for the office, but I have a question and will check back later to hopefully see an answer.  It's a serious question, I'm not being nasty.  If the answer purports to go to credibility, I'll consider that BS.  IMO, Kermit's credibility was earned from the documentation of facts and is not dependent on gender or occupation so that just doesn't hold water. 


Can someone please explain to me what Kermit's gender or occupation has to do with Natalee Holloway, her vicious murder, and the government-sanctioned coverup thereof?

 
It just seems to me that good people are letting themselves be used as pawns to serve the purpose of some ex-monkey's twisted internet power-trip in trying to create a forum war and it has very, very little to do with the Natalee and/or her family.  Maybe if I can get a clear answer to this question I won't feel this way anymore.

Anyone?  Anyone?


walk away Lisa...walk away from the key board!! lol
You know this one will get you into deep sheet!!

See that!! I am being good today!! :o)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 12:01:49 PM
Does anyone know if any divers dived on any of the other targets, those other than the fish trap that only ALE had access to?

I don't mean with the ROV camera but actual live divers.

I remember Kyle saying that they were going to fly in a team of
divers to dive on the other sites because Tim Traham was the
only diver they had on the Persistence and he had left.
Then Kyle said that the Persistence was not the right boat
for diving and they needed a much smaller boat.
That is about when they all left Aruba. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 12:05:00 PM
So posting what you think is someone's life history/personal information and that of their children is OK but posting emails is not?

I think posting personal information is much worse, IMO.

It is the words of OE that create the problem, not who posted them.  Most of what was posted was also posted here in this forum.  We just didn't pay that much attention at the time except for a few alert monkeys.



I'm beginning to think we need a different thread for the moaners and the groaners to attack our posters on. It would help keep the focus on Natalee in this one. imo
It's not like our attacked posters can 'take the fight' over there  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Anna -- iirc -- the remaining 100+ targets were spotted (technical, aren't I) and then had ROV dives -- prior to being determined 'viable'.

None of them had live divers as the company apparently only had enough money to identify them as 'viable'.

Janet, or one of our much more organized than I Monkeys, can probably find a few quotes to that effect. Posted here, as well as some posts from BFN

Somehow, I doubt that a separate thread would be utilized as described and would overflow back to here, but I do agree that this thread has become a place where amicable discussion or debate regarding Natalee's case has been compromised.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 12:05:24 PM
Does anyone know if any divers dived on any of the other targets, those other than the fish trap that only ALE had access to?

I don't mean with the ROV camera but actual live divers.

I remember Kyle saying that they were going to fly in a team of
divers to dive on the other sites because Tim Traham was the
only diver they had on the Persistence and he had left.
Then Kyle said that the Persistence was not the right boat
for diving and they needed a much smaller boat.
That is about when they all left Aruba. 


But....but....

Didn't Jossy say his son was on the Persistence every day?  And don't we know he's a diver?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 12:10:12 PM
Does anyone know if any divers dived on any of the other targets, those other than the fish trap that only ALE had access to?

I don't mean with the ROV camera but actual live divers.

I remember Kyle saying that they were going to fly in a team of
divers to dive on the other sites because Tim Traham was the
only diver they had on the Persistence and he had left.
Then Kyle said that the Persistence was not the right boat
for diving and they needed a much smaller boat.
That is about when they all left Aruba. 


But....but....

Didn't Jossy say his son was on the Persistence every day?  And don't we know he's a diver?



I think that they were talking of American divers, but I could be wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:12:33 PM

.
Anyone??  Anyone??  Ferris?  Ferris Buehler?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:14:04 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:16:52 PM
vms, I saw you trying to discredit Kermit before he posted
any of the information that Kyle had posted at Freebirds.
Did you draw the short straw today to come and bash
Kermit?
It doesn't change Kyle's words and his failure to act
in Natalee's best interest.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:18:34 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Would you not bring more divers down there to begin with for the potential that you may need to dive on more then one target?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:21:15 PM
PRIVATE EYE

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »

If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


In terms of fixing a game.Isn't a game fixed before it starts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 12:25:23 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



According to Kyle...NO.  The Aruban divers came in their own boat
and retreived the contents of the cage directly to their own boat.
However, we know that Tim Trahan did dive on the site and give
the thumbs down signal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 12:25:38 PM
Does anyone know if any divers dived on any of the other targets, those other than the fish trap that only ALE had access to?

I don't mean with the ROV camera but actual live divers.

Anna,

Nothing that I have read/seen/been told indicates there was ever any other personnel dives on anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: always 1 on January 30, 2009, 12:26:25 PM
Sea Monkey, I see you up there, was reading here yesterday and wondered if you got tossed as well, (you dont have to answer)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:28:15 PM
PRIVATE EYE

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »

If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


In terms of fixing a game.Isn't a game fixed before it starts?


I would think so.  It is hard to fix a game in mid point.  But in this instance, I am not so sure this is not what happened.  Originally the search was only going to be for 2 to 3 weeks.  What happened to cause it to be prolonged for such a long time?  Did something happen to change the original intent of the search or what?  From 2 weeks to 4 months is a tremendous change of plans.  What brought this about exactly?

Or was that the intent all along?  I don't know.  I also don't knnow who or what determined the length of the search but do know that donations were being solicitated even as they were packing up and leaving and the abrupt departure was not expected.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 12:30:27 PM
PRIVATE EYE

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »

If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


In terms of fixing a game.Isn't a game fixed before it starts?


I would think so.  It is hard to fix a game in mid point.  But in this instance, I am not so sure this is not what happened.  Originally the search was only going to be for 2 to 3 weeks.  What happened to cause it to be prolonged for such a long time?  Did something happen to change the original intent of the search or what?  From 2 weeks to 4 months is a tremendous change of plans.  What brought this about exactly?

Or was that the intent all along?  I don't know.  I also don't knnow who or what determined the length of the search but do know that donations were being solicitated even as they were packing up and leaving and the abrupt departure was not expected.

.

From what Kyle told us - the reason the project was extended was AFTER they found the cage, Richardson encouraged them to explore further out, in deeper waters.

Silvetti immediately followed that direction, abandonded the cage, and began mapping searching out in deeper waters.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 12:32:18 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Caps posted a rebuttal to Kermit on Dec. 3, 2008 and stated that he'd been to the cage site the week before.  How he or anyone else outside of ALE or Persistence crew would know where it was is a question.  Whether anything was taken or touched in the past year, before or during the search another question.

Caps post, here, midway on the page:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:33:54 PM
PRIVATE EYE

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »

If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


In terms of fixing a game.Isn't a game fixed before it starts?


I would think so.  It is hard to fix a game in mid point.  But in this instance, I am not so sure this is not what happened.  Originally the search was only going to be for 2 to 3 weeks.  What happened to cause it to be prolonged for such a long time?  Did something happen to change the original intent of the search or what?  From 2 weeks to 4 months is a tremendous change of plans.  What brought this about exactly?

Or was that the intent all along?  I don't know.  I also don't knnow who or what determined the length of the search but do know that donations were being solicitated even as they were packing up and leaving and the abrupt departure was not expected.

.

For me it is all very suspect.Not physically diving on targets,One diver on the Persistence(was that for show?),Soliciting donations when your not searching(i mean mapping the floor) anymore,and the Grand Finale of allowing the ALE to confiscate the remains of the cage without any regards for CHAIN OF CUSTODY!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:36:38 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Caps posted a rebuttal to Kermit on Dec. 3, 2008 and stated that he'd been to the cage site the week before.  How he or anyone else outside of ALE or Persistence crew would know where it was is a question.  Whether anything was taken or touched in the past year, before or during the search another question.

Caps post, here, midway on the page:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838

If CapsLockWizard truly had Natalee's best interest at heart don't you think he would have taken a underwater camera,as well as photographs of the cage? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:39:38 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:43:30 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Caps posted a rebuttal to Kermit on Dec. 3, 2008 and stated that he'd been to the cage site the week before.  How he or anyone else outside of ALE or Persistence crew would know where it was is a question.  Whether anything was taken or touched in the past year, before or during the search another question.

Caps post, here, midway on the page:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838


Yes, that is an interesting post, 2 NJ.  I wonder why Caps would bother to go there and dive in 90 ft of water if he thought Natalee had been cut up in little pieces and placed all over the island.

Maybe he will come on an post an answer to that as I am sure others wonder as well.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 12:43:31 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Caps posted a rebuttal to Kermit on Dec. 3, 2008 and stated that he'd been to the cage site the week before.  How he or anyone else outside of ALE or Persistence crew would know where it was is a question.  Whether anything was taken or touched in the past year, before or during the search another question.

Caps post, here, midway on the page:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838

I was always curious as to how he new EXACTLY where to dive for the cage

It's a pretty big ocean out there.  ::MonkeyConfused::

Or is this the newest 'dive spot' ??
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 12:43:42 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



According to Kyle...NO.  The Aruban divers came in their own boat
and retreived the contents of the cage directly to their own boat.
However, we know that Tim Trahan did dive on the site and give
the thumbs down signal.

Considering Beth Holloway and the FBI have received from the Natalee's Freebirds all of the info that Kyle Kingman shared in his own words regarding John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruba coverup ... I would assume that any investigation by the FBI that is going on behind the sences would dictate that both Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan are questioned.

Tim Tehran is the key to exposing with certainty this entire conspiracy.  I do not think for one moment that Tim would be in negotiations with major networks if he could not back up the ROV images with a first hand account of what he observed in that December 30, 2008 dive.

This is why Louis Shaeffer (ROV copyright), Kyle Kingsman (ROV analyst) and Tim Tahran (diver) are thisclose in regards to the network negotiations.

Obviously, Tim Trahan did not anticipate the leak of the ROV images on the internet by Kyle Kingman when he stated following the December 30, 2008 dive that there was "nothing" in the trap/cage.

Then when you stop and consider Tim Trahan, Kyle Kingman and Louis Shaefer's attempts at major network deals ... logic dictates Trahan was not being truthful there was "something" in that cage/trap.

Janet
_______


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


On Dec. 30, off the coast of Aruba, divers from the Aruban police force and the research vessel Persistence were about to make a crucial dive on a promising target in the search for Natalee Holloway.

The researchers had discovered a fish trap about 90 feet below the surface in almost the exact spot search expert Tim Miller had theorized Natalee’s body might be.

Team leader Tim Trahan suited up to join the Aruban police divers. As Tim Miller wished him well, the divers hit the water and the ROV was sent down to capture what would happen for everyone watching on board.

(On the boat)

Brandon: We have visual on divers and target.

Slowly the divers worked their way down to the trap.

They had been instructed to give a thumbs up or thumbs down.

The atmosphere in the survey room was tense, and nerves were raw as Miller, the Aruban authorities and the crew of the Persistence waited for word of what exactly was in the trap.

The divers approached the target and signaled above. And then...

(On the boat)

No it's thumbs down.

Negative, not it.

Crushing disppointment.

(On the boat)

Tim Miller: Divers coming up right now. I don't know it looked as promising today as it did last night or before.

Miller: Nothing?  

Trahan: No.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/5/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 12:43:50 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

He absolutely did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 12:46:07 PM
Kyle said: "We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Kermit on January 30, 2009, 12:51:17 PM
#889 on: Today at 09:27:03 AM   KLAAS
Did Kermit ever say specifically they were SS, FBI or CIA?  Serious question, I really don't know
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4448.880

ANSWER: NO

I said: "I have met 4 living presidents.
I said: "I have worked on high profile cases"
I said: "I have been involved in bringing down a U.S. President."

vms
SS
Idstlou
Hotshot
their LEAK


are ALL mistaken or purposely lying for their own agenda.

vms lied about me accused me of posting a picture of Lorenzo that was Slipnot. FaithMS actually found and posted the picture and verified that. vms never acknowledged that fact.
Instead, vms continues to lie and stated to me on SM that she doesn't trust me because I used the nic Hope
and changed it to Kermit. I had no choice, but change my nic because Robin Holloway used my nic at BFN (I was told). I tried to sign up their with the same nic. I am not sure what that constitues distrust in her when she told me she uses the nic: just asking.
Then vms accused me of posting a dead link to Lorenzos tickle site. As though I had control over him deleting his own tickle site.
I think anyone with eyes can see vms hatred and agenda towards me. It's pretty obvious and says more about her and her group of buddies then anything I have ever done or said.

Idstlou said I was a liar because I did not have emails from lalasmom.
When I posted a screen shot as proof, she then said it was a screen shot of a header.
At least she recognized what it was. lol
She also stated that I said I received the email. I never said that either. I posted proof of their LEAK. But she continues to call me the liar.

SS,
accused me and Janet of malicious and intentional injury to her and posting CAPS REAL NAME.
We both asked her several times to show us where that information was posted. She refused
and then came back with some report on me and how I lied about being a Secret Service agent.


This is how these posters attack me rather then bring proof of the RV Persistence, John Silvetti, Louis Schafer, and CAPS' information that THEY SAID in their own words. Bring forth information/proof of these facts or crawl back into their hole!









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:52:32 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”

Kyle said: "We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap."


These three statements tell the tale!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 12:53:20 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Anna ... I cannot believe you asked that question.  Are you doubting the integrity of jen, Wingnut and Kermit.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Kermit on January 30, 2009, 12:57:22 PM


I would like to know if ANY diver of any nationality was allowed to dive on the trap and take samples, any one that did not dive from and return to the ALE police boat.  Anyone who took samples that were not given directly to ALE and only to ALE.

For me, that's the problem.



Caps posted a rebuttal to Kermit on Dec. 3, 2008 and stated that he'd been to the cage site the week before.  How he or anyone else outside of ALE or Persistence crew would know where it was is a question.  Whether anything was taken or touched in the past year, before or during the search another question.

Caps post, here, midway on the page:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838

Yes CAPS had the nerve to email a greif stricken father, Dave Holloway and told him she was buried in the cemetery. And you know what Dave's response was. We searched the cemetery.
Common sense goes a long ways imo.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Kermit on January 30, 2009, 12:59:01 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Anna ... I cannot believe you asked that question.  Are you doubting the integrity of jen, Wingnut and Kermit.

Janet



Kyle said it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 12:59:19 PM
#889 on: Today at 09:27:03 AM   KLAAS
Did Kermit ever say specifically they were SS, FBI or CIA?  Serious question, I really don't know
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4448.880

ANSWER: NO

I said: "I have met 4 living presidents.
I said: "I have worked on high profile cases"
I said: "I have been involved in bringing down a U.S. President."

vms
SS
Idstlou
Hotshot
their LEAK


are ALL mistaken or purposely lying for their own agenda.

vms lied about me accused me of posting a picture of Lorenzo that was Slipnot. FaithMS actually found and posted the picture and verified that. vms never acknowledged that fact.
Instead, vms continues to lie and stated to me on SM that she doesn't trust me because I used the nic Hope
and changed it to Kermit. I had no choice, but change my nic because Robin Holloway used my nic at BFN (I was told). I tried to sign up their with the same nic. I am not sure what that constitues distrust in her when she told me she uses the nic: just asking.
Then vms accused me of posting a dead link to Lorenzos tickle site. As though I had control over him deleting his own tickle site.
I think anyone with eyes can see vms hatred and agenda towards me. It's pretty obvious and says more about her and her group of buddies then anything I have ever done or said.

Idstlou said I was a liar because I did not have emails from lalasmom.
When I posted a screen shot as proof, she then said it was a screen shot of a header.
At least she recognized what it was. lol
She also stated that I said I received the email. I never said that either. I posted proof of their LEAK. But she continues to call me the liar.

SS,
accused me and Janet of malicious and intentional injury to her and posting CAPS REAL NAME.
We both asked her several times to show us where that information was posted. She refused
and then came back with some report on me and how I lied about being a Secret Service agent.


This is how these posters attack me rather then bring proof of the RV Persistence, John Silvetti, Louis Schafer, and CAPS' information that THEY SAID in their own words. Bring forth information/proof of these facts or crawl back into their hole!









In time i have a feeling that the list will grow just a tad! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 12:59:38 PM
I'm back  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:00:51 PM
copy,paste,copy,paste,copy,paste,copy!Must be the fight song for CnG. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 01:02:03 PM
I'm back  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyDance::  I must go out in 20 degree weather and let our beloved pet do her thing.  I may be back to assist in getting there.  Thanks, Nut.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 01:02:47 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #736 2/27 -
« Reply #544 on: February 29, 2008, 12:28:32 AM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: ******* on February 29, 2008, 12:14:22 AM
Quote from: coolhand on February 29, 2008, 12:00:09 AM
Maybe Mr Schafer can sell the television rights to the remainder of the search to one of the networks so they can raise enough money to finish the search,  and possibly recoup his own money.  Any thoughts?

Quote *******...

Welcome to the cage coolhand! I am sure Mr.Schafer,The Family and everyone involved by now has looked at all measures to conclude the mission but your idea is a good one. Hopefully a Ross Perot type as stepped up to the plate so the Persistence can finish what they started.
[/quote

Quote Kyle...

This is a very good idea.  We've been working on that for a couple weeks.  I've personally been handling the matter while I was on the east coast last week.  Unfortunately, the Dateline story aired along with Greta and scooped up the remainder of what the press felt was immediately worth reporting on.  I can't blame them.  It's business.  Definitely shot that down though.  Move on.  Deal with it. Stay the course.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg357222#msg357222
 
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:03:03 PM
copy,paste,copy,paste,copy,paste,copy!Must be the fight song for CnG. ::MonkeyTongue::

Back to the hidey-hole.HEY.Back to the hidey-hole.HEY............ ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:03:10 PM
I believe that sometime between the discovery of the cage and the December 30th dive that ALE become actively involved and ... John Silvetti was provided with an incentive to take a back seat ... look the other way as far as being a participant in the recovery efforts.

However ... Kyle Kingman and Tim Miller became problems.  They had both seen the ROV images and ... Kyle Kingman whose professional expertise encompasses analysing ROV images had determined Natalee Holloway remains could possibly be in that cage/trap.

Janet

_____

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Kermit on January 30, 2009, 01:03:11 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 01:03:13 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

YES

DEFINITELY

ABSOLUTELY

UNQUESTIONABLY

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:05:35 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyEek:: You have got to be kidding!  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Kermit on January 30, 2009, 01:07:06 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyEek:: You have got to be kidding!  ::MonkeyEek::

No I am not kidding in the slightest.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 01:07:54 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Stay vigilant and safe, my dear green friend.

I'm sorry that the dark side has not found a new game yet :-(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: bc73 on January 30, 2009, 01:08:18 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.

Kermit, could you please stay logged on, because as soon as you come by discussions pick up, theories get worked on, and all the B.S comes to an end from the Bitch@Moan "invitees"....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:08:28 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyEek:: You have got to be kidding!  ::MonkeyEek::

No I am not kidding in the slightest.



Lord Have mercy!These people.Are they American?Seriously.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:10:17 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyShocked::

It is referred to as "collaborating with the enemy" ... the enemy who has had an agenda since day one to prevent justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:13:15 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

YES

DEFINITELY

ABSOLUTELY

UNQUESTIONABLY

.

I can't hear ya Sharon.

LOUDER!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:14:03 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


This is beyond being mislead,and or ignorance at this point!This is utterly sad! ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

It is referred to as "collaborating with the enemy" ... the enemy who has had an agenda since day one to prevent justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 01:14:27 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Anna ... I cannot believe you asked that question.  Are you doubting the integrity of jen, Wingnut and Kermit.

Janet



Kyle said it.




Janet,

I am affording one and all every possible opportunity to refute the posts or the fact that Kyle made them.  Not at all am I questioning Kermit, wingnut or jen but offering anyone with evidence to the contrary ample opportunity to counter what has been posted.

Anyone is welcomed and being encouraged to refute this now or forever shut up about it!  Either they can or they can't.  Either Kyle said it or he didn't.  I don't see anyone posting any evidence or even suggesting that he didn't say it. 

So shouldn't the problem be with Kyle instead of Kermit?  Kyle was the one doing all the talking.

I just want yes or no/he said it or he didn't.  Then that would be the end of discussion.  It is from others who have a problem with what Kyle said being posted that I pose the question.

And if Kyle did say it, then what is wrong with posting the fact that he did say all those things and more?

Why do some not want what Kyle said to be posted and discussed?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:14:51 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


This is beyond being mislead,and or ignorance at this point!This is utterly sad! ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

It is referred to as "collaborating with the enemy" ... the enemy who has had an agenda since day one to prevent justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

Janet


This is beyond being mislead,and or ignorance at this point!This is utterly sad! ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:17:17 PM
copy,paste,copy,paste,copy,paste,copy!Must be the fight song for CnG. ::MonkeyTongue::

Back to the hidey-hole.HEY.Back to the hidey-hole.HEY............ ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Who's turn is it today! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 01:17:34 PM
 ::MonkeyCool:: I am ready


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:18:23 PM
::MonkeyCool:: I am ready

I got my Feces suit on Nut!Waiting for the Sh_t to fly! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:19:25 PM
Kyle said: " We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.”

Kyle said: "The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.”


Did Kyle say the above or not?

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Anna ... I cannot believe you asked that question.  Are you doubting the integrity of jen, Wingnut and Kermit.

Janet



Kyle said it.




Janet,

I am affording one and all every possible opportunity to refute the posts or the fact that Kyle made them.  Not at all am I questioning Kermit, wingnut or jen but offering anyone with evidence to the contrary ample opportunity to counter what has been posted.

Anyone is welcomed and being encouraged to refute this now or forever shut up about it!  Either they can or they can't.  Either Kyle said it or he didn't.  I don't see anyone posting any evidence or even suggesting that he didn't say it. 

So shouldn't the problem be with Kyle instead of Kermit?  Kyle was the one doing all the talking.

I just want yes or no/he said it or he didn't.  Then that would be the end of discussion.  It is from others who have a problem with what Kyle said being posted that I pose the question.

And if Kyle did say it, then what is wrong with posting the fact that he did say all those things and more?

Why do some not want what Kyle said to be posted and discussed?

 ::MonkeyDance::

EXACTLY!!!

Somehow many of those at BnG are attacking the messanger who exposed John Silvetti's betrayal of Natalee's family when he assisted the enemy in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup.  WHY!!!  When did John Silvetti take priority over justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for a family who has been on a neverending roller coaster ride from H--- since May 30, 2005.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:19:28 PM
I believe that sometime between the discovery of the cage and the December 30th dive that ALE become actively involved and ... John Silvetti was provided with an incentive to take a back seat ... look the other way as far as being a participant in the recovery efforts.

However ... Kyle Kingman and Tim Miller became problems.  They had both seen the ROV images and ... Kyle Kingman whose professional expertise encompasses analysing ROV images had determined Natalee Holloway remains could possibly be in that cage/trap.

Janet

_____

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)




LOUDER JANET!LOGIC DICTATES! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:20:38 PM
::MonkeyCool:: I am ready

I missed ya Nut.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 01:20:40 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:25:50 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)

Ready,set,stop! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 01:26:17 PM
9 posts to go..... I think


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:27:00 PM
9 posts to go..... I think

No hints Nut!Come on.Fair and square! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 01:29:10 PM
I sent an email to Tylergal and asked her to come back to the thread and post.  I hope she and others will as we need some more clear heads as we now oddly seem to have far more "guests" than posters much of the time now.

I know she is very busy but maybe she will.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 01:29:50 PM
#889 on: Today at 09:27:03 AM   KLAAS
Did Kermit ever say specifically they were SS, FBI or CIA?  Serious question, I really don't know
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4448.880

ANSWER: NO

I said: "I have met 4 living presidents.
I said: "I have worked on high profile cases"
I said: "I have been involved in bringing down a U.S. President."

vms
SS
Idstlou
Hotshot
their LEAK


are ALL mistaken or purposely lying for their own agenda.

vms lied about me accused me of posting a picture of Lorenzo that was Slipnot. FaithMS actually found and posted the picture and verified that. vms never acknowledged that fact.
Instead, vms continues to lie and stated to me on SM that she doesn't trust me because I used the nic Hope
and changed it to Kermit. I had no choice, but change my nic because Robin Holloway used my nic at BFN (I was told). I tried to sign up their with the same nic. I am not sure what that constitues distrust in her when she told me she uses the nic: just asking.
Then vms accused me of posting a dead link to Lorenzos tickle site. As though I had control over him deleting his own tickle site.
I think anyone with eyes can see vms hatred and agenda towards me. It's pretty obvious and says more about her and her group of buddies then anything I have ever done or said.

Idstlou said I was a liar because I did not have emails from lalasmom.
When I posted a screen shot as proof, she then said it was a screen shot of a header.
At least she recognized what it was. lol
She also stated that I said I received the email. I never said that either. I posted proof of their LEAK. But she continues to call me the liar.

SS,
accused me and Janet of malicious and intentional injury to her and posting CAPS REAL NAME.
We both asked her several times to show us where that information was posted. She refused
and then came back with some report on me and how I lied about being a Secret Service agent.


This is how these posters attack me rather then bring proof of the RV Persistence, John Silvetti, Louis Schafer, and CAPS' information that THEY SAID in their own words. Bring forth information/proof of these facts or crawl back into their hole!









This is how these posters attack me rather then bring proof of the RV Persistence, John Silvetti, Louis Schafer, and CAPS' information that THEY SAID in their own words. Bring forth information/proof of these facts or crawl back into their hole!

I always get the stacks wrong so bringing this down.
Kermit, I am not going to address the rest, I did that last night in a post in regards to the emails and the ldstlou not idstlou.

As far as this last statement, let me address these issues.

I trust Klaas wholeheartedly. I have told her stuff I really was not supposed to because I trust her so much. And true to her nature, when I have asked her to keep the information between us, she always has...thank you Klaas. So it really alarmed me when I saw that you were copying and pasting info from a sight that I..me alone..my opinion, had always felt was a sacred place...and that was the Freebirds forum. It just really bothered my sense of integrity..and ask Klaas...I bitched about it!! lol But I believe you felt it was important to disseminate the information. Your choice and maybe I should not have judged. For me, it was the wrong thing to do, but it is apparent other Monkeys appreciate this info coming out into the open.

So now it was out in the open. I don't know you, I didn't know your background and the accusations just did not ring true to me. So I im'ed Kyle...and to my surprise he answered, and we ended up having a phone conversation. I shared every bit of that info here...even got some info wrong when I was relaying it to you...as Ana likes to point out...but I was willing to go back and ask other questions, for myself and for others who asked me to.

I also asked Jug about the information. He answered me and said it was ok to post his beliefs, and that was that the Persistence endeavor was on the up and up. Some asked me to ask him additional questions and so I did. Took heat for asking...took heat for posting his answers...I took heat. So who hasn't here..I get over it the same as everyone else. My point is I certainly did try and gather information on the Persistence and bring that info here...I am sorry if it didn't coincide with what you believe...but I did try and help discern the truth. And that is all I am after, the truth.

So now I have 3 people telling me 2 different things and for me...it then comes down to credibility. There is no man more honest or credible imho than Jug, so that was all it took for me really. After talking to Kyle, I understood his posts that you were bringing over here and the nature of what was happening...I believe I do anyways.

So now I have to try and discern your credibility. Too many Monkeys I trust and admire stood by you and so I thought I must be missing something here, that they must know you and know about you and there was just something that I was missing that was causing me to not trust you like they do. So I asked you questions, and got answers that really circled my questions. Then there have been things that you posted that did not ring true...like an email you said you received from Lalas...that just..well...was difficult for me to believe.

So credibility is everything to me here...because I have two conflicting stories, and I am trying desperately to discern the truth... and well...that is just where I am at.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:30:18 PM
9 posts to go..... I think

No hints Nut!Come on.Fair and square! ::MonkeyLaugh::

You Monkey's are sad playing both sides of the fence.Got your right foot in one thread and your left foot in the other! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 01:31:48 PM
because I can ...  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:32:10 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyEek:: You have got to be kidding!  ::MonkeyEek::

No I am not kidding in the slightest.



Lord Have mercy!These people.Are they American?Seriously.

BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 01:32:28 PM


I'm about to leave for the office, but I have a question and will check back later to hopefully see an answer.  It's a serious question, I'm not being nasty.  If the answer purports to go to credibility, I'll consider that BS.  IMO, Kermit's credibility was earned from the documentation of facts and is not dependent on gender or occupation so that just doesn't hold water. 


Can someone please explain to me what Kermit's gender or occupation has to do with Natalee Holloway, her vicious murder, and the government-sanctioned coverup thereof?

 
It just seems to me that good people are letting themselves be used as pawns to serve the purpose of some ex-monkey's twisted internet power-trip in trying to create a forum war and it has very, very little to do with the Natalee and/or her family.  Maybe if I can get a clear answer to this question I won't feel this way anymore.

Anyone?  Anyone?



Just got to the office - I see there's no answer to my question, so I'll have to go with


some ex-monkey's twisted internet power-trip


Pathetic, really.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 01:33:09 PM
VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday.

Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too.


 ::MonkeyEek:: You have got to be kidding!  ::MonkeyEek::

No I am not kidding in the slightest.



Lord Have mercy!These people.Are they American?Seriously.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 01:33:12 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/MODLOCK1.gif)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4460.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 01:33:52 PM
  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Anna, are you saying those of us here do not have clear heads?