Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 08:39:56 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 08:39:56 AM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 11:53:59 AM
jumped in.....gonna call Mr. Whyte about that cat....grrr!!!!  If they don't let him adopt him I will write the newspaper...I am afraid he might already b gone!  :cry:

At least Mikey can pinpoint him to the cat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:55:54 AM
Lisa from St. Louis (sorry lost your nic in the thread change) wrote:
if there is "some" truth in every story..could she have hit her head on Joran's pool? In order to hear monkey screech would they have had to have been outside? So she hits her head while swimming...but not at beach!! Where are you going to hit your head at a beach?

There are small cove type beaches in that area, so there would be rocks along the edges....I'll grab a photo example and post in a sec...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 11:57:00 AM
Doesn't it Pizz you off to know that, while we discuss Natalee,  Paul and Joran are watching the World Cup?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 11:57:19 AM
Hammer would be good.

Sleuth, I remember you early on, thinking right.  At the time, I went to Aruba travel sites (ones that someone taking a trip would look at for ideas).  I noticed the mention of "nocturnal nurse sharks" at DePalm Island.  Just noticed that area is by the caves to the south.  How did the statement about Natalee wanting to see sharks get started??  Maybe she had read about the cute nocturnal nurse sharks on line before the trip and brought it up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 11:58:39 AM
I believe you got a point with the cell phone, Klaas...

Still have headache...when I see Nat's pic I hear in my mind, "You've abandoned me"....

I pray back to her that I haven't.  I am anxiously waiting for news just like all of you.

I had a dream last night about a plane crash that happened while I was looking at it and then I saw today on the headlines about the plane crash in Russia was it?  I dread plane crash dreams because to me that means I will have a terrible day.  Hope not and that it was a deja vu.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:00:44 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
jumped in.....gonna call Mr. Whyte about that cat....grrr!!!!  If they don't let him adopt him I will write the newspaper...I am afraid he might already b gone!  :cry:

At least Mikey can pinpoint him to the cat.


I don't understand why they won't let you at least put a hold on the cat??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:01:57 PM
Or the Tour de France.  

what is the distance from the monkey cage to the pool?  Not far I guess.  Perhaps she was at that residence and not the VDS's.

The pool story started IMO when they were getting their stories together.  Meeting point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:02:03 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Doesn't it Pizz you off to know that, while we discuss Natalee,  Paul and Joran are watching the World Cup?

Yes it does.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:03:20 PM
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 12:04:42 PM
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 3:47 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I have on numerous times tossed around the idea that they turned right on LGSmith and went towards the Spanish Lagoon or Lorenzo's, but I never see anything to substantiate it. Thus my opinion, based on what I've see thus far, goes along with Klaasend that they first went to the VDS residence and then on from there. The big question in my mind is did they just swing by there and then go on toward Koens or a beach, or did they stay at the VDS residence.

I'm outraged that the VDS compound was not fully searched, because I firmly believe there was evidence there - whether it be from when they first went there or evidence that was 'brought back'.

Why did it take so long for Paulus to come out that night that Beth, Jug, etc were there?
 

Can I asl a question? Why do we keep trying to fit the lighthouse into the picture that night? If 3am Natalee makes a call from Joran's house, and he is on computer until 3:30, and Deepak cleaning his car at 4am...where is the time to go to lighthouse?  4am? maybe? But it is conceivable also that they did not dispose of her body until the following night and the body was still at VS property. Didn't Beth say she felt in her gut Natalee was there at the house that night?  And you know...if police came pounding at my door at 3am...I would not stand in the street for all the neighbors to see...I would invite them into my house to get them OFF of the street!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:06:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
jumped in.....gonna call Mr. Whyte about that cat....grrr!!!!  If they don't let him adopt him I will write the newspaper...I am afraid he might already b gone!  :cry:

At least Mikey can pinpoint him to the cat.


I don't understand why they won't let you at least put a hold on the cat??


Because it is a kitten.  They don't hold kittens so it is first come first serve basis.  If the cat was an adult they would've let me put a "HOLD" on him; let me pay a fee or the whole thing then I could get him when they verify KC's history with the vet.  I know, I was fuming!!!!!

I was able to put a hold on an adult cat; but because they don't test for leukemia the cat died with me.  Mr. Whyte wanted to make sure he could get there at noon when they open up to get O'Douls for me.  Funny thing, Jewel was the name of my cat.  The girls at the shelter were shocked at the name similarity and the resemblance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:06:57 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Or the Tour de France.  
what is the distance from the monkey cage to the pool?  Not far I guess.  Perhaps she was at that residence and not the VDS's.
The pool story started IMO when they were getting their stories together.  Meeting point.

Sometimes, when your neighbour is going to be away for a while, you are asked to watch their property, feed their animals, etc. The VDS might have had the key to Mico's owners house and Joran used it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:08:45 PM
As I understand, that house was searched right?  I hope so! :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:10:29 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.

The VDS house doesn't look like a big house.  They looks like a bunch of shacks on one piece of property.  From the overhead picture of that property it doesn't even look clean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 12:11:36 PM
Did they ever use a "scent" dog, or just a cadaver dog??

I know TES searched the neighbor's yard...but don't know which neighbor for sure...I think the monkey one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:12:46 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Or the Tour de France.  

what is the distance from the monkey cage to the pool?  Not far I guess.  Perhaps she was at that residence and not the VDS's.

The pool story started IMO when they were getting their stories together.  Meeting point.


Whytegirl - good point.  It's been said the neighbors that owned the monkey were out of town.  Who was feeding the monkey?  Did the Sloot's have a key to the neighbors home?

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/MonkeyVDS.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:15:33 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Did they ever use a "scent" dog, or just a cadaver dog??

I know TES searched the neighbor's yard...but don't know which neighbor for sure...I think the monkey one.


It was the monkey one and Red was there while it was searched.  He can answer any questions about it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:17:35 PM
Where's Red and Tom?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 12:17:43 PM
Klaas

Is the big long building the garage or the house??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:17:47 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
As I understand, that house was searched right?  I hope so! :roll:

It depends on who you are asking.  Medlerelay (the liar) says that every part of the property was searched except for the younger brother's room.
1.  Considering Joran had 2 younger brothers, are we to assume that those 2 shared a room?
2.  Are we to assume that the youngest younger brother's room was not searched?  
3. Who decided that a part of the house did not need to be searched or was it suggested by a family member?

To answer your ?, I do not think that the house was searched right !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 12:18:21 PM
Quote
Can I ask a question? Why do we keep trying to fit the lighthouse into the picture that night? If 3am Natalee makes a call from Joran's house, and he is on computer until 3:30, and Deepak cleaning his car at 4am...where is the time to go to lighthouse? 4am? maybe? But it is conceivable also that they did not dispose of her body until the following night and the body was still at VS property. Didn't Beth say she felt in her gut Natalee was there at the house that night? And you know...if police came pounding at my door at 3am...I would not stand in the street for all the neighbors to see...I would invite them into my house to get them OFF of the street!!


I still think it all happened here. Remember Jossy? said he was SURE DNA evidence found here. Was it a new matrees delivered really? or something else? And Beth's gut has been right on so far...she felt Natalee was still at the house the night they went there!! REASON!! why he didn't invite them in...I mean come on guys...wouldn't your 1st instinct be to get them in the house or in the compound so the whole world wasn't standing there watching you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 12:19:46 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
jumped in.....gonna call Mr. Whyte about that cat....grrr!!!!  If they don't let him adopt him I will write the newspaper...I am afraid he might already b gone!  :cry:

At least Mikey can pinpoint him to the cat.


I don't understand why they won't let you at least put a hold on the cat??


Because it is a kitten.  They don't hold kittens so it is first come first serve basis.  If the cat was an adult they would've let me put a "HOLD" on him; let me pay a fee or the whole thing then I could get him when they verify KC's history with the vet.  I know, I was fuming!!!!!


ps....just said a little prayer that you get your kitty-kitty!! :wink:
I was able to put a hold on an adult cat; but because they don't test for leukemia the cat died with me.  Mr. Whyte wanted to make sure he could get there at noon when they open up to get O'Douls for me.  Funny thing, Jewel was the name of my cat.  The girls at the shelter were shocked at the name similarity and the resemblance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:19:49 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Did they ever use a "scent" dog, or just a cadaver dog??

I know TES searched the neighbor's yard...but don't know which neighbor for sure...I think the monkey one.


I just asked Red and he said a cadaver dog.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:20:49 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Or the Tour de France.  

what is the distance from the monkey cage to the pool?  Not far I guess.  Perhaps she was at that residence and not the VDS's.

The pool story started IMO when they were getting their stories together.  Meeting point.


Whytegirl - good point.  It's been said the neighbors that owned the monkey were out of town.  Who was feeding the monkey?  Did the Sloot's have a key to the neighbors home?

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/MonkeyVDS.jpg)

The main residence and the other bedrooms are closer to the monkey cage then Joran's apartment.  Did Natalee manage to grab someones cell phone (sanders?) while trying to escape from their property and run to the neighbors property.  Was she possibly hiding near the monkey cage when the call was made.  They were looking for her and realized she had a phone in her hands and had gotten a call off.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 12:20:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Did they ever use a "scent" dog, or just a cadaver dog??

I know TES searched the neighbor's yard...but don't know which neighbor for sure...I think the monkey one.


I just asked Red and he said a cadaver dog.


So...if she had been alive at the house...the dog would not have gotten a hit??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 12:21:07 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 12:23:45 PM
Quote from: "San"

The main residence and the other bedrooms are closer to the monkey cage then Joran's apartment.  Did Natalee manage to grab someones cell phone (sanders?) while trying to escape from their property and run to the neighbors property.  Was she possibly hiding near the monkey cage when the call was made.  They were looking for her and realized she had a phone in her hands and had gotten a call off.


Or they went into the house and left her in the car (she refused to get out)...she grabbed Sander's cell phone (plugged into charge in car) and then ran to neighbors...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:23:47 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/MonkeyVDS.jpg)[/quote]

Are the 3 buildings -from left to right
the sleeping quarters - the main house - Joran's pad?

Is Mico -the neglected chimp-to the left of the VDS property?

What do we know about the house to the right?

Are there houses across the street?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 12:24:51 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.


Klaas...help me here...thought it was the phone call to Beth's cell phone in the middle of the night much later that Dave dismissed? Am I correct...thought we agreed there was in fact a call from Natalee the night she disappeared.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 12:25:16 PM
San.............as far as how far the sound would carry, if a monkey screech is anything like a bird's ( I have a mulucan cockatoo), it would easily carry to and well beyond the VDS compound.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 12:25:52 PM
Homes in Aruba look kinda chitty!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 12:26:51 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Homes in Aruba look kinda chitty!


GVCs and Lorenzo's mom's didn't look too shabby.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:27:41 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.

The phone call that Dave dismisses is the one during Hurricane Katrina!
People have heard the phone call from Natalee saying "I don't know these people"  It is a fact according to A L  Gunslinger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 12:28:18 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"


Klaas...help me here...thought it was the phone call to Beth's cell phone in the middle of the night much later that Dave dismissed? Am I correct...thought we agreed there was in fact a call from Natalee the night she disappeared.


This is what I remember too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:28:44 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "San"

The main residence and the other bedrooms are closer to the monkey cage then Joran's apartment.  Did Natalee manage to grab someones cell phone (sanders?) while trying to escape from their property and run to the neighbors property.  Was she possibly hiding near the monkey cage when the call was made.  They were looking for her and realized she had a phone in her hands and had gotten a call off.


Or they went into the house and left her in the car (she refused to get out)...she grabbed Sander's cell phone (plugged into charge in car) and then ran to neighbors...

That could be because the VDS driveway is one straight path to the monkey cage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:30:07 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.


CBB - the call they were discussing on the Dr. Phil show was a different call.  The reason Beth is so sure Natalee was in the VDS home is based on the call received on May 30th.  The call they were discussing  on the Dr. Phil show was much later, durring the hurricaines.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 12:31:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.

The VDS house doesn't look like a big house.  They looks like a bunch of shacks on one piece of property.  From the overhead picture of that property it doesn't even look clean.


Morning monkeys!

San, I think their property looks more like a "compound..."

Anybody seen None lately?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:32:05 PM
CBB - fess up  :lol:  you just wanted an excuse to use that beating the horse emoticon...right??   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:32:25 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Hammer would be good.

Sleuth, I remember you early on, thinking right.  At the time, I went to Aruba travel sites (ones that someone taking a trip would look at for ideas).  I noticed the mention of "nocturnal nurse sharks" at DePalm Island.  Just noticed that area is by the caves to the south.  How did the statement about Natalee wanting to see sharks get started??  Maybe she had read about the cute nocturnal nurse sharks on line before the trip and brought it up.


The statement about Natalee wanting to see sharks came from Joran.  He has also said this on the interview with Greta.  

Good memory Buckeye - that was back in July of 2005, when I first heard of a potential boat involvement.  I was trying to come up with 'destinations' that they could be saying they would be going to.  The two that I could think of was DePalm Island (think Mr. Pink connections with ScubaAruba) and Renaissance Island.

ANother shark discussion was in regards to Shark Bay - which is over toward the Natural Bridge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:34:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

CBB - the call they were discussing on the Dr. Phil show was a different call.  The reason Beth is so sure Natalee was in the VDS home is based on the call received on May 30th.  The call they were discussing  on the Dr. Phil show was much later, durring the hurricaines.

The monkey sounds must be loud because Beth even heard them from the VDS residence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:34:19 PM
Pics of the search of the VDS neighbors home and property:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/08/02/van-der-sloot-house/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 12:34:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.


CBB - the call they were discussing on the Dr. Phil show was a different call.  The reason Beth is so sure Natalee was in the VDS home is based on the call received on May 30th.  The call they were discussing  on the Dr. Phil show was much later, durring the hurricaines.


OTAY Panky!  :wink:
Thank you so much for clearing this up for me. I'm going to go give the horse a proper burial now.......
I'm still surprised that MSM hasn't given this element of the case more attention, but hey, MSM isn't exactly on top of things, are they?
Thank you Klaas, and thank you all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 12:34:47 PM
Have we ever discussed that "sharks" could be a metaphor for "card sharks" or "loan sharks?"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 12:37:29 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.


Exactly!

 8) Good Morning All ~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 12:40:02 PM
Quote
Home > Discuss > The Evidence Line >  Timeline May 30, 2005 Time line of  events  May 30, 2005
1:00 am   Natalee, Joran, Deepak and Satish depart Carlos 'n Charlies.  Closing time on Sunday night was earlier than other nights. In Joran's interview with Greta he says they left at "probably one a.m."  Reference: Joran van der Sloot/Greta interview

1:00 am - 1:50  Deepak drives Natalee and Joran   Conflict: Deepak states that "They drove around, drove to the lighthouse", then to the Marriott beach.  Reference : David Kock/Greta interview . Joran states in all of his interviews that they did not go to the lighthouse, but drove by his house staying in the car, then drove to the Marriott beach. Ending time is calculated by figuring the drive time to Deepak's home from the beach, and deducting that time from Deepak's computer login time (discussed in the following entry).
Also, note the conflict described in the following entry, which describes circumstances which indicate the drive might have ended at 1:35 am and not 1:50.
 


1:50 am   Natalee and Joran dropped at beach.  Conflict: Calculated as ten minutes prior to Deepak's computer log in at 2:00 am.. This is from David Kock statement that this is the drive time from Marriott beach area.  However, Aruban observers have noted that the Kalpoes live in Hooiberg, which is towards the airport on the opposite side of Orangestad from Palm Beach and the area where Joran lives.  Joran's asserts that Deepak lives 20 minutes from him.  Joran also says that he lives 5 minutes from the beach. So, the drive to Deepak's home  from the beach would have been 25 minutes.  Using Deepak's log in time as the mark, this would have meant that Natalee and Joran were dropped off at 1:35 am and not 1:50 am.
Dropoff might have even been several minutes prior to 1:50 or 1:35 (whichever is accurate), since a few minutes probably lapsed between arriving home and actually logging in.
 


1:59 am   Deepak and Satish arrive home.  The arrival home might have been even earlier, because the computer log in (2:00 am), most likely, would not have been done the instant they arrived home.


2:00 am   Deepak logs onto computer.  From the David Kock Greta interview, citing records presented in court.
2: 45 am   Joran cellphone call to Deepak  Conflict: We are assuming this call was not made to Deepak's cell phone. Only Joran's cellphone records are ever described in all discussions by David Kock and Joran or the Aruban police.  Plus, although not reliable, the so-called unsigned Deepak statement says Deepak's cellphone was not used that night, because no minutes were available. Even though that statement was authored  by police investigators , verifiable facts are not the kind of information to be falsified.    We then must also assume that Deepak has an internet connection separate from his home phone (maybe broadband), because Joran quotes Deepak as saying he was on the computer at the time, although new phone modems interrupt and pause for incoming calls.  Without seeing Deepak's or Joran's cellphone records, we can't verity which phone (home or cell) received the call.  It may not be an important distinction, since Deepak answered an IM from Joran (discussed in a subsequent entry) showing he was still home at a later time.
3:00 am   Deepak logs off computer.  Conflict: This was in David Kock's August interview.  It is in conflict with Joran's computer records, which indicate that Deepak answered an IM (instant message) from Joran at 3:45.  According to Joran, ABC news verified these computer records.  
3: 00 am   Satish arrives in Deepak's car at Marriott beach areas  This was deduced from Joran's assertion that Satish arrived, 10-15 minutes after Joran's 2:45 am phone call  to Deepak. (Joran/Greta interview). Conflict: Deepak and Satish maintain that they stayed home and did not go out again and that Joran walked home.
3:05 am  Joran cellphone call to Deepak. ..  David Kock says this was a call at 3:00 or shortly thereafter. He quotes Deepak, that this was Joran was saying that he arrived at home.  According to Kock, Joran's cellphone triangulation data indicated that this call was made from the neighborhood, which could either be the Mariott beach area all the way to Joran's  home). David Kock quote, "...that is not an exact pinpoint indication, but the general area is the area here in north of palm beach of the hotels."  
Marginal Conflict:  Not a phone "call, " but a cellphone "text message". Kock in a subsequent interview says that there was a phone call from Joran to Deepak and a later "chat message."  This will correspond with Koch's earlier statement that there were two phone contacts, by assuming that the second one was a cellphone text message and not the computer IM, which is discussed as occurring later. Hence his discussion of triangulation would not be in conflict.  Joran also verifed in the Greta interview that the "I got home" message was a cellphone text message as he distinguished two messages, and described the second one saying, " No, that was on the computer afterwards."

Potential conflict: Some people have questioned the accuracy of cellphone triangulation from the area around the beach and Joran's home, but that wiouldn't disprove that the call wasn't made from his house, merely weaken it as a proof that it was made from there.
 
3:05 am   Joran arrives home  Conflict: In the Greta interview, Joran states that the driving time from his house to the beach is five minutes. This would make the arrival time, thirty minutes prior to Joran's computer log in time.  In Greta interview, Joran says he arrived earlier than computer log in time and went to kitchen to get something to eat and drink, was going to go to sleep, then decided check if any friends were on line, if there was "anyone to talk to." According to David Kock statements presented to the courts showed that Deepak affirmed that Joran walked home.  A five minute drive would be an approximately 45 minute walk. If Joran started walking at 2:40 am, he could have then been home at about 3:30 am, coinciding with his computer login time with no thirty minute gap.
The thirty minutes gap is either an unaccounted for block of time or it was spent in the walk from the beach to his home (assuming someone in the group is telling the truth)..
 
3:35 am   Joran logs onto computer  Joran maintains computer log on records verified by ABC news.
3:45 am   Joran Instant messages Deepak, and receives answer   Joran says this is in the records verified by ABC news.  Conflict: as  described previously, David Kock says 3:00 am was Deepak's log off time.
3:50 - 4:00 am  Joran IM's Deepak again.  No answer.  Joran says he IM's (instant messaged) Deepak.  Deepak is showing as still on line.  Deepak doesn't answer. Joran assumes he is just away from the computer.  This is in the records verified by ABC news according to Joran. Conflicts with what David Kock says was Deepak's log off time.
6:40 am   Joran on school bus.  Joran's interview with Greta and verified from several sources.

 

This came up when I googled David Koch and timeline...don't think we can discount the records of Joran's phone calls. Puts him by pond about same time gardner saw him...then back at home about 3am...when Natalee got her phone call in.
Sorry so long.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 12:40:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
CBB - fess up  :lol:  you just wanted an excuse to use that beating the horse emoticon...right??   :lol:  :lol:


 :lol: Well, I would rather admit to that than admit to something as important as this call going right over my head!

Now you've done it. One final catch up, since the call now exists in my reality. What time did it come through?

The content was, "Mom, I don't know these people", and monkey sounds, right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 12:41:43 PM
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:42:43 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.


I could believe that as it was her last night in Aruba she might have been enticed by another site to see that she had not been to yet.  Such as the lighthouse.  

Does anyone remember if the MB kids went to the lighthouse earlier in their vacation?  If not, that would be a reason to go there - tourist destination, good views of the lights, etc. at night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on July 09, 2006, 12:43:54 PM
Been catching up, and the posts regarding PVDS's delay in responding when police and Holloway/Twitty entourage arrived 5/31 early AM made me recall that he also came out of the bushes, sotospeak, when Greta and Beth came to call.  What the heck was that all about?  It's also stuck in my mind as peculiar.  Sorry if this post makes me seem stuck on stupid, but it was something that came back to me.

Good day all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 09, 2006, 12:43:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Did they ever use a "scent" dog, or just a cadaver dog??

I know TES searched the neighbor's yard...but don't know which neighbor for sure...I think the monkey one.


It was the monkey one and Red was there while it was searched.  He can answer any questions about it.


No offense to any of us monkey's, lol....but it must really suck to live next to someone who has a screechingggg monkey. That is almost as bad as living next to someone who has a rooster, egads. Again I thank klaas 4 her pix and info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:44:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Pics of the search of the VDS neighbors home and property:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/08/02/van-der-sloot-house/

That yellow wall doesn't look to high and I could get over that fense.  There was a story about Natalee trying to climb over a fence and hitting her head.  Just thinking of the possibility.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:44:28 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
jumped in.....gonna call Mr. Whyte about that cat....grrr!!!!  If they don't let him adopt him I will write the newspaper...I am afraid he might already b gone!  :cry:

At least Mikey can pinpoint him to the cat.


I don't understand why they won't let you at least put a hold on the cat??


Because it is a kitten.  They don't hold kittens so it is first come first serve basis.  If the cat was an adult they would've let me put a "HOLD" on him; let me pay a fee or the whole thing then I could get him when they verify KC's history with the vet.  I know, I was fuming!!!!!


ps....just said a little prayer that you get your kitty-kitty!! :wink:
I was able to put a hold on an adult cat; but because they don't test for leukemia the cat died with me.  Mr. Whyte wanted to make sure he could get there at noon when they open up to get O'Douls for me.  Funny thing, Jewel was the name of my cat.  The girls at the shelter were shocked at the name similarity and the resemblance.


Thank you!!!!!!!!!!

Mr. Whyte forgot so I sent him quickly, it is 12:43 here so they opened almost an hour ago.

Call me obsessed but first come first served basis-the cat could've been gone after I left or just now.  I'd rather have him check and try to adopt him for me.

What has me ????? is that there is NO PAPER TRAIL.  I have adopted cats from them 3-4 times and I always have to fill the damn application with repeated info so I am never NEVER in their system.  They just keep a log, apparently, on the pets up for adoption.  Not the people the pets go to.  KC was adopted from them in 2002.

If Mr. Whyte brings a kitty home I will post pics ASAP.  If it is this one I will be post up a pic and scan up the one I have of Jewel so you see the resemblance.  That cat also has Maine Coon in him cause it was huge to be a kitten.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 12:44:41 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.

The VDS house doesn't look like a big house.  They looks like a bunch of shacks on one piece of property.  From the overhead picture of that property it doesn't even look clean.


.....and it looks just orange! Anita's color palette went overboard in her attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.  I would have a difficult digesting my food there on a daily basis. Wonder if the main house has a stone floor ??? As in falling and "hitting her head on the floor" ? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:44:49 PM
At 1:30 AM?  Is the Lighthouse lit up at night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:45:56 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


I think we have a couple.  Linda ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 12:45:58 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?



(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/post_smsaruba_thumb.jpg)

 :lol: Ohhhhhh................I'm sorry easy. :wink:  You kinda walked into that one.
My toes are still curled from being so thick, and I'm just being silly. {HUGS}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:48:00 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
At 1:30 AM?  Is the Lighthouse lit up at night?


The lighthouse itself does not have lights and is locked up.  

There are streetlights in that area so getting there at night is not a problem, and it is a good vantage point to see the twinkling lights of Palm Beach area, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:48:58 PM
CBB - good one regarding the posters     :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 12:49:30 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.


I could believe that as it was her last night in Aruba she might have been enticed by another site to see that she had not been to yet.  Such as the lighthouse.  

Does anyone remember if the MB kids went to the lighthouse earlier in their vacation?  If not, that would be a reason to go there - tourist destination, good views of the lights, etc. at night.

That is a good question Sleuth.  What if they found out that Natalee wouldn't want to see the lighthouse because she already took a trip there with her friends.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:49:46 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
San.............as far as how far the sound would carry, if a monkey screech is anything like a bird's ( I have a mulucan cockatoo), it would easily carry to and well beyond the VDS compound.


Tink,

Miss your avatar!!!!  Found my Tink green polo shirt and thought of you.  I had a Severe Macaw and the sound is quadraphonic.  My neighbors have two Cockatoos and I never hear 'em.  I am just a couple of houses down.  I don't know how they do it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 12:50:15 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


I think we have a couple.  Linda ?


I hear Joran is back in Aruba for the summer and has a summer job.  I would like to know more about that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 12:50:35 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Been catching up, and the posts regarding PVDS's delay in responding when police and Holloway/Twitty entourage arrived 5/31 early AM made me recall that he also came out of the bushes, sotospeak, when Greta and Beth came to call.  What the heck was that all about?  It's also stuck in my mind as peculiar.  Sorry if this post makes me seem stuck on stupid, but it was something that came back to me.

Good day all.


You aren't stuck on stupid. Jug said if he had it to do over, he would have blocked the driveway and not left until the car trunk had been opened and searched. He, at least thought it very possible that Nat was still on the premisis.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:51:08 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdshome.jpg)



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdsred2.gif)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdsred1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 12:51:14 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.


The call that Dave dismisses took place last October. This is another call..a call made that fateful night in May.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 12:52:29 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


Only front page posters Arubaanse and Linda although I haven't seen Linda post in a while.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 12:52:58 PM
Van der Sloot interview- Listen to Part 2
http://tinyurl.com/czdyw


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:53:08 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Have we ever discussed that "sharks" could be a metaphor for "card sharks" or "loan sharks?"


We have, but the shark stuff came from Joran's statements indicating that Natalee wanted to see sharks.  Why would she want to see card or loan sharks?

The only way I see Natalee wanting to see sharks is if she was enticed into wanting to see a new spot on the island (oh man, now I remember a sufing place by the lighthouse called "spot" - and I'll have to go back and research that too   :lol:  :lol: )

Buckeye's recollection about cute nurse sharks at DePalm, for example.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 12:53:16 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "San"

The main residence and the other bedrooms are closer to the monkey cage then Joran's apartment.  Did Natalee manage to grab someones cell phone (sanders?) while trying to escape from their property and run to the neighbors property.  Was she possibly hiding near the monkey cage when the call was made.  They were looking for her and realized she had a phone in her hands and had gotten a call off.


Or they went into the house and left her in the car (she refused to get out)...she grabbed Sander's cell phone (plugged into charge in car) and then ran to neighbors...


It certainly makes sense it could have been Sander's phone...especially since it 'magically' disappeared during time frame!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 12:53:24 PM
Sleuth wrote:
mishy wrote:
I will add that I was taking a computer class on the morning that Natalee missed her flight and my instructor was a Mtn Brook mom, who had just received word about Natalee on her email and told me about it. She said whoever emailed her said that they were searching for a "father and son" in relation to her disappearance...

It was weeks later when I heard speculation on the blogs or MSM that a "father" might have been involved...do I have that timeline right?


WOW Mishy, if that instructor had that on the day Natalee went missing, I wonder who she received the email from. If it was the morning Natalee went missing, that would have been PRIOR to Beth and Jug arriving and visiting the VDS property.

Spooky wrote:

wasnt that posted on that first tripadvisor post by the wife of one of the chaperones? i could be wrong. does anyone have those posts handy?

Does anybody else remember this tripadvisor post Spooky was talking about? I never went to tripadvisor...
_________________


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:54:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


Only front page posters Arubaanse and Linda although I haven't seen Linda post in a while.


Didn't Linda post in the last week or so....going back to see...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 12:54:46 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Homes in Aruba look kinda chitty!


No duh! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 09, 2006, 12:56:58 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.


Exactly!

 8) Good Morning All ~


Excellent point, and I agree. I know in the past few days I have seen things that say she met Joran before that night, but I also remember what Leigh ......I think her name is...said Nat had not met Joran before that night. Some reports say they had met before that night. Too many damn rumours out there.......ACKKKKK!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 12:57:13 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


Only front page posters Arubaanse and Linda although I haven't seen Linda post in a while.


Didn't Linda post in the last week or so....going back to see...


My error - I get my Linda's mixed up.  I haven't seen FP poster Linda from Aruba on for a while.  Forum poster Linda from Kansas was on last weekend...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 12:58:55 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Have we ever discussed that "sharks" could be a metaphor for "card sharks" or "loan sharks?"


Yes we did.  Especially the Monkey males blogging at the time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:01:27 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Sleuth wrote:
mishy wrote:
I will add that I was taking a computer class on the morning that Natalee missed her flight and my instructor was a Mtn Brook mom, who had just received word about Natalee on her email and told me about it. She said whoever emailed her said that they were searching for a "father and son" in relation to her disappearance...

It was weeks later when I heard speculation on the blogs or MSM that a "father" might have been involved...do I have that timeline right?


WOW Mishy, if that instructor had that on the day Natalee went missing, I wonder who she received the email from. If it was the morning Natalee went missing, that would have been PRIOR to Beth and Jug arriving and visiting the VDS property.

Spooky wrote:

wasnt that posted on that first tripadvisor post by the wife of one of the chaperones? i could be wrong. does anyone have those posts handy?

Does anybody else remember this tripadvisor post Spooky was talking about? I never went to tripadvisor...
_________________


Not the wife of a chaperone, but Alana Jordan's (Dash) mom Arbeej:


arbeej
Tuesday, May 31st, 2005, 11:46 PM
I cannot find any web address info for police stations in Aruba. I am trying to get info on their current investigation on the DISAPPEARANCE (ABDUCTION? MURDER?) of a teenaged girl during our local high school's trip to Aruba. How can I reach them?!

The child's mother has flown to Aruba to help look for her. Our only source for information is the travel agent, who is not receiving much info, either. None of us is getting direct info from the police. I have searched but cannot find any internet info on how to contact them directly.

I was encouraged to read that just a week or so ago, the Aruba police did solve a kidnapping case, rescuing two sisters. I hope we have the same result. (It sounds as if they are moving swiftly on the case.) Meanwhile we are all losing our minds with grief and worry. It would help to get some official word.

Our travel agent assured us as parents that our children would be safe in Aruba on this chaperoned trip. Yet now that this tragedy has occurred, I have since heard from others that this sort of thing happens all the time. Is this true?!

I hope some of you can direct me to official sources. Meanwhile, we will appreciate your prayers for the safe return of this young girl.

arbeej
Wednesday, June 1st, 2005, 03:11 PM

My daughter ACTUALLY WITNESSED Natalee right outside the entrance to Carlos & Charlie's at around 1:00 a.m. Monday morning. (The paper says she left at 1:30.) My daughter was leaving the bar with two friends, and they were right behind another group. She called to Natalee and asked if she wanted to walk with them (I forget now if my daughter was headed to the hotel or the bar across the street; I think the latter). Natalee cheerfully said no, she would catch up to the group right ahead and walk with them (implying she would be along in a few moments). My daughter had no idea she would not see Natalee again.

This part my daughter didn't see, but was told by her friends: That Natalie passed them on the road a short while later, and that she was a passenger in a taxi with another person. She clearly did not know she was in danger; she leaned out the window and shouted something like "Aruba!!! WOOHOO!" Still having a wonderful time.

I have read and heard other versions since then -- that she was actually seen getting in a car with three men; that she was alone with the guy in his car; that it was a grey car; that it has been impounded by the police. I don't know which is the accurate account.

The kids she passed assumed she was headed back to the hotel complex. No one thought there was any danger; obviously Natalee did not think so either.

That's the only bit I know was witnessed by my daughter or her other friends. But it is agreed that the guy misrepresented himself, and that she got in willingly. Also, I assume everyone in the bar had been drinking, but none of those who passed Natalee had the impression that Natalee was falling-down-drunk or anything like that. I mean to say, probably she had been drinking and wasn't exercising good judgement, but she wasn't bad off enough to cause concern, or someone with the group would have taken her back to the hotel. There were chaperones there, the kids were of legal drinking age, and no one realized there was any danger.

I'll post if I hear any more news, and now that the media is covering this, I'll very much appreciate reading anything that you guys find out.

Thanks, all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:01:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/1.gif)

I'm bring out the poor horse.............But this call with the monkey sounds is emerging as more and more pivotal to try to figure out what happened and when and where it occurred.
My recollection is that Dave dismissed the call. Beth was less sure than Dave that it should be dismissed in the Dr. Phil appearance. However, as time has passed, neither of them have given the call the place of importance in any interview I have witnessed that one would expect, if it were accepted as fact that Nat made the call. In fact, I have witnessed many times, Dave and Beth say that they are sure Nat was taken to Joran's after leaving C&Cs, but beyond that, they aren't sure of anything. What is the surety expressed in this forum based on? Wow, that sounds confrontive, doesn't it? That's not intentional....I have a tremendous amount of respect for the posters here. I'm just missing something and want to be as confident as others are. HELP! TIA.


CBB - the call they were discussing on the Dr. Phil show was a different call.  The reason Beth is so sure Natalee was in the VDS home is based on the call received on May 30th.  The call they were discussing  on the Dr. Phil show was much later, durring the hurricaines.


Page 190...Dave's book: "On Monday, October 3, 2005, Beth's private cell phone  received a voice mail message. When Beth went to retreive it, she heard the voice of a girl calling, "Mom, help me." She was able to hear other voices in the background. She reported the call to the FBI, and they were going to do a voice analysis to compare it to Natalee and also to attempt to determine from where the call originated."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:04:20 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"

CBB - the call they were discussing on the Dr. Phil show was a different call.  The reason Beth is so sure Natalee was in the VDS home is based on the call received on May 30th.  The call they were discussing  on the Dr. Phil show was much later, durring the hurricaines.

The monkey sounds must be loud because Beth even heard them from the VDS residence.


Yes, and I remember how Greta and Beth deliberately made a lot 'to do' over the monkey leading one to conclude that the monkey's presence/ sounds must play a part.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:05:15 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Where's Red and Tom?


Around....Tom very seldom posts (but I love it when he does - love your sense of humor, Tom).

I chatted with Red for a bit yesterday - he had a "honey do" list that he needed to work on.  I told him to say hi from me to the honey with the "do list"   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:06:27 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


I think we have a couple.  Linda ?


I hear Joran is back in Aruba for the summer and has a summer job.  I would like to know more about that.

Easy, it was Hotshot who provided some info last week that he was in the casino with some girlfriend. HotShot said that she had a friend in the Marriott who told that to her. I don't remember anyone seeing Joran " working"  :oops:  :oops:  :oops: although I did read on several sites that he had a job for the summer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:06:38 PM
Casino Video:
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=1648336


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 09, 2006, 01:06:45 PM
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 09, 2006, 01:08:40 PM
I go back and forth but right now I am leaning toward 2K telling the truth that they actually went to the lighthouse not Joran's house.  In Deepak's June 9 statement he said they turned left off LG Smith toward Choose A Name, if they were going to Joran's house they would have just kept going in that direction.  However Deepak said they then circled around to get back on the main road, and that at 1:20 when they passed back thru the intersection where they encountered the MB kids before, the MB kids were no longer there.  How did he know they weren't still there unless he did turn around, and why take the chance of being contradicted on that by the MB kids, when he didn't need to say they turned around to go to the lighthouse, he could have just said they got back on the main road somewhere past Choose A Name.  There are other little things too, like Deepak saying Satish put in the porno when they reached La Cabana, La Cabana is on the main road, they wouldn't pass it going to Joran's house.  And in one of the statements Art Wood gave to the NE it said one of the suspects got out to relieve themselves at Arashi beach (contradicting Deepak's original statement hat they didn't stop), was that said in case someone saw the car parked.  Joran first mentioned stopping at his house in order to incriminate 2K, as part of his 2nd story, that 2K droped him off at his house and drove off with Nat.  Maybe even after he changed his story to agree with 2K on the M beach dropoff, he just decided to stick with saying they went to his house for some reason, perhaps because he didn't want to admit lying about that, and to counter the idea that Nat thought he was staying at the HI.  

If they did take Nat to the lighthouse/Arashi beach, whatever happened there Nat had to still be alive when she left, because it's not plausable that Deepak would have been home chatting on his computer just minutes after witnessing her death.  Unless Deepak went home leaving her alive with Joran and/or Satish on Arashi beach, but that doesn't make much sense.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "San"

The main residence and the other bedrooms are closer to the monkey cage then Joran's apartment.  Did Natalee manage to grab someones cell phone (sanders?) while trying to escape from their property and run to the neighbors property.  Was she possibly hiding near the monkey cage when the call was made.  They were looking for her and realized she had a phone in her hands and had gotten a call off.


Or they went into the house and left her in the car (she refused to get out)...she grabbed Sander's cell phone (plugged into charge in car) and then ran to neighbors...


It certainly makes sense it could have been Sander's phone...especially since it 'magically' disappeared during time frame!


Wonder if it was destroyed in the early cover up...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:09:33 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
......attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


 :lol:  :lol:

I've heard about putting lipstick on a pig, but the silk purse is new to me   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 01:10:15 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


I think we have a couple.  Linda ?


I hear Joran is back in Aruba for the summer and has a summer job.  I would like to know more about that.


Joran has a job?  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 01:11:06 PM
Morning all ...

Have not had time to listen to the PodCast but have read the transcript.
Just making a qucik post & go  (sorry)

I was sure hoping Dana & Art could have confirmed one way or the
other  who was staying in the JVDS house hold  Sunday / Monday. :cry:

IF younger brother(s) were home... to me less chance of cover-up activities occuring there yet makes you question Monday night. when police arrive and Papa heads out with ALE to the casino.
Did anyone see people peeking out the windows when police were talking in the front yard with MB group?
JMO  of course

Sorry for the post & run...   catch ya later
SeeeeeYaaaaByeeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:11:39 PM
Does Paul have a job?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:14:00 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Where's Red and Tom?


Around....Tom very seldom posts (but I love it when he does - love your sense of humor, Tom).

I chatted with Red for a bit yesterday - he had a "honey do" list that he needed to work on.  I told him to say hi from me to the honey with the "do list"   :lol:  :lol:

I chatted with Red this morning - yes he has a honey do list.  He's painting today :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:15:07 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?

Paulus?  YES he works for the same Law firm now as Joran's lawyer Carlos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:15:52 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "San"

The main residence and the other bedrooms are closer to the monkey cage then Joran's apartment.  Did Natalee manage to grab someones cell phone (sanders?) while trying to escape from their property and run to the neighbors property.  Was she possibly hiding near the monkey cage when the call was made.  They were looking for her and realized she had a phone in her hands and had gotten a call off.


Or they went into the house and left her in the car (she refused to get out)...she grabbed Sander's cell phone (plugged into charge in car) and then ran to neighbors...


It certainly makes sense it could have been Sander's phone...especially since it 'magically' disappeared during time frame!


Wonder if it was destroyed in the early cover up...


I wouldn't doubt it.

Going back over the articles Klass found last night, the coverup confab 'around the pool' (Deepak told Mickey about) to get their stories straight, had to have happened pretty early in the game, as by 31 May, Paulus is pretending to Headmaster Werner that the HI tape wasn't functioning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:16:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?

Paulus?  YES he works for the same Law firm now as Joran's lawyer Carlos.


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdsholida3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:17:10 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!

Maybe he's working for Paulus in the law office. I can't see him working at much else there. In the public eye all day ? No way, unless you were planning on burning your business down next. :lol:
The girl was a blonde, I believe from Holland.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:18:12 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!


Well, if he has a job at any familiar locations, it might be very telling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:18:14 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Ono"
......attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


 :lol:  :lol:

I've heard about putting lipstick on a pig, but the silk purse is new to me   :lol:


That's an old one! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:19:42 PM
Just posted by ******* in the front page area:

For me the big picture is becoming clearer.Art mentioned that Sander Gottenbos had his cell phone stolen the same day natalee went missing.Natalee got off 2 calls that morning on someones cell phone.”I dont know these people”was one of the reported messages she left.His cell phone was tossed for 1 of 2 reasons.1.To make sure that call wasnt placed back to him.2.Natalee was already injured and there was blood all over that cell phone.

It was probably a prepaid phone and couldnt be traced back to anyone with the exception of looking at phone records.That has probably been destroyed or tampered with anyways.

It looks to me that after being seen by the gardner they hooked up with the Gottenbos and most likely freddy since he said he spent the night at the VDS house and immediately left aruba after his arrest.She was most likely was in the company of all these “pimps”.Paulus most likely picked up freddy and joran at 4am that morning after dumping natalee in a temporary place.

Deepak and Satish must of got the hell out of there after being seen at 2.30am and Immediately started cleaning the car as the rest of the pimps disposed of natalee.They knew plenty of witnesses saw natalee leave in deepaks car.Apparently the first thing they did after dropping Natalee and Joran off was clean the car.She had to be already Injured at 2.30 or shortly there after.Was she injured in that car or just placed in there after being injured?

Its not just the Van der sloots they are protecting but also another wealthy and politically strong family the Goettenbos.They did a damn good job to make sure nothing was ever leaked about Freddy or the Goettenbos.They kept the focus off of them and Koen wasnt even questioned once!!

The big question remains what happened between 2.30 and 4am?Were the Kalpoes already home and cleaning there vehicle when natalee made that phone call?Why get together with Koen and Sander if natalee wasnt dead yet to use their boat?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:19:42 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Lisa from St. Louis (sorry lost your nic in the thread change) wrote:
if there is "some" truth in every story..could she have hit her head on Joran's pool? In order to hear monkey screech would they have had to have been outside? So she hits her head while swimming...but not at beach!! Where are you going to hit your head at a beach?

There are small cove type beaches in that area, so there would be rocks along the edges....I'll grab a photo example and post in a sec...



Sorry for the delay - I got sidetracked by some old interesting front page blogs....

Here is an example photo of Malmok Beach.  This beach is the one that is really close (less than a mile) from the Koen family residence..
(http://www.shorediving.com/Earth/ABC/Aruba/Malmok_Beach/d004929.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 09, 2006, 01:19:55 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?


I am intrigued that you call him Paul. I have read many threads here and in other places that call him Paulus.......PLUS, if I remember correctly, there was a video somewhere of even Anita calling him Paulus'....not Paul. I am sure Klaas has that on file. Then recently I read that his name is not paulus, and that he should be called paul. NOT that this info is important in anyway........but it is interesting. I DO REMEMBER in one interview that even ANITA called him PAULUS.....not paul....anyone else remember that??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:21:10 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Do we still have any posters from Aruba?


I think we have a couple.  Linda ?


I hear Joran is back in Aruba for the summer and has a summer job.  I would like to know more about that.


Joran has a job?  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


 :lol: Can you imagine what it must be? LOL! Maybe sorting case files in Papa's office? Testing condoms perhaps?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:27:04 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I go back and forth but right now I am leaning toward 2K telling the truth that they actually went to the lighthouse not Joran's house.  In Deepak's June 9 statement he said they turned left off LG Smith toward Choose A Name, if they were going to Joran's house they would have just kept going in that direction.  However Deepak said they then circled around to get back on the main road, and that at 1:20 when they passed back thru the intersection where they encountered the MB kids before, the MB kids were no longer there.  How did he know they weren't still there unless he did turn around, and why take the chance of being contradicted on that by the MB kids, when he didn't need to say they turned around to go to the lighthouse, he could have just said they got back on the main road somewhere past Choose A Name.  There are other little things too, like Deepak saying Satish put in the porno when they reached La Cabana, La Cabana is on the main road, they wouldn't pass it going to Joran's house.  And in one of the statements Art Wood gave to the NE it said one of the suspects got out to relieve themselves at Arashi beach (contradicting Deepak's original statement hat they didn't stop), was that said in case someone saw the car parked.  Joran first mentioned stopping at his house in order to incriminate 2K, as part of his 2nd story, that 2K droped him off at his house and drove off with Nat.  Maybe even after he changed his story to agree with 2K on the M beach dropoff, he just decided to stick with saying they went to his house for some reason, perhaps because he didn't want to admit lying about that, and to counter the idea that Nat thought he was staying at the HI.  

If they did take Nat to the lighthouse/Arashi beach, whatever happened there Nat had to still be alive when she left, because it's not plausable that Deepak would have been home chatting on his computer just minutes after witnessing her death.  Unless Deepak went home leaving her alive with Joran and/or Satish on Arashi beach, but that doesn't make much sense.

..
Over at BFN, there is the English translation of the Dutch version of AMW, the show that Holland did. In the show, they did mention going to the lighthouse. Deepak said, I guess in one of his statements that they stopped the car at Arashi Beach on the way back from the lighthouse as one of them had to relieve themselves. I don't know what the distance is from C & C's to the lighthouse. The car was spotted in front of Diamonds International on a camera at 1:18 ? it was said.
They were looking at quite a few different locations and also wanted any info from anyone who saw the car on hte way to Joran's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:27:38 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?


I am intrigued that you call him Paul. I have read many threads here and in other places that call him Paulus.......PLUS, if I remember correctly, there was a video somewhere of even Anita calling him Paulus'....not Paul. I am sure Klaas has that on file. Then recently I read that his name is not paulus, and that he should be called paul. NOT that this info is important in anyway........but it is interesting. I DO REMEMBER in one interview that even ANITA called him PAULUS.....not paul....anyone else remember that??


Nut44x4 - In the Greta interview with Anita and Paulus/Paul (I've always referred to him as Paulus), the transcripts used "Paul".  I'm going to listen to the audio again and see if I hear Paul or Paulus.  

Leslie posted the link to the interview a page or two back (thanks Leslie)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160471,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 01:28:00 PM
Klaas

At Joran's bday party at KIA, I remember Jaime and Sander in pics in the parking lot.  Was Koen or Freddy there??  Do I remember this correctly??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:29:52 PM
Sleuth:

Thanks for that picture. Lots of treacherous-looking rocks, that's for sure. And so close to Koen's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 09, 2006, 01:29:58 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I go back and forth but right now I am leaning toward 2K telling the truth that they actually went to the lighthouse not Joran's house.  In Deepak's June 9 statement he said they turned left off LG Smith toward Choose A Name, if they were going to Joran's house they would have just kept going in that direction.  However Deepak said they then circled around to get back on the main road, and that at 1:20 when they passed back thru the intersection where they encountered the MB kids before, the MB kids were no longer there.  How did he know they weren't still there unless he did turn around, and why take the chance of being contradicted on that by the MB kids, when he didn't need to say they turned around to go to the lighthouse, he could have just said they got back on the main road somewhere past Choose A Name.  There are other little things too, like Deepak saying Satish put in the porno when they reached La Cabana, La Cabana is on the main road, they wouldn't pass it going to Joran's house.  And in one of the statements Art Wood gave to the NE it said one of the suspects got out to relieve themselves at Arashi beach (contradicting Deepak's original statement hat they didn't stop), was that said in case someone saw the car parked.  Joran first mentioned stopping at his house in order to incriminate 2K, as part of his 2nd story, that 2K droped him off at his house and drove off with Nat.  Maybe even after he changed his story to agree with 2K on the M beach dropoff, he just decided to stick with saying they went to his house for some reason, perhaps because he didn't want to admit lying about that, and to counter the idea that Nat thought he was staying at the HI.  

If they did take Nat to the lighthouse/Arashi beach, whatever happened there Nat had to still be alive when she left, because it's not plausable that Deepak would have been home chatting on his computer just minutes after witnessing her death.  Unless Deepak went home leaving her alive with Joran and/or Satish on Arashi beach, but that doesn't make much sense.

..
Over at BFN, there is the English translation of the Dutch version of AMW, the show that Holland did. In the show, they did mention going to the lighthouse. Deepak said, I guess in one of his statements that they stopped the car at Arashi Beach on the way back from the lighthouse as one of them had to relieve themselves. I don't know what the distance is from C & C's to the lighthouse. The car was spotted in front of Diamonds International on a camera at 1:18 ? it was said.
They were looking at quite a few different locations and also wanted any info from anyone who saw the car on hte way to Joran's.


In my opinion...that whole fiasco of the Dutch re-enactment was for show. So much was not even real, as far as we all know now as being truth. I do not trust Aruban/Dutch, period. They played that out carefully......there was a reason for that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:30:50 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?


I am intrigued that you call him Paul. I have read many threads here and in other places that call him Paulus.......PLUS, if I remember correctly, there was a video somewhere of even Anita calling him Paulus'....not Paul. I am sure Klaas has that on file. Then recently I read that his name is not paulus, and that he should be called paul. NOT that this info is important in anyway........but it is interesting. I DO REMEMBER in one interview that even ANITA called him PAULUS.....not paul....anyone else remember that??


Funny you should mention that.  Early on a friend of mine in Aruba would always refer to him as Paul.  I asked about that and was told most people called him Paul.  I guess it is kind of like Michael and Mike.  My wives always called me Michael for some reason, but friends call me Mike or a$$hole.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:30:54 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas

At Joran's bday party at KIA, I remember Jaime and Sander in pics in the parking lot.  Was Koen or Freddy there??  Do I remember this correctly??


Don't remember Koen or Freddy being there, but it's been a long time since seeing those pictures.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:32:45 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I go back and forth but right now I am leaning toward 2K telling the truth that they actually went to the lighthouse not Joran's house.  In Deepak's June 9 statement he said they turned left off LG Smith toward Choose A Name, if they were going to Joran's house they would have just kept going in that direction.  However Deepak said they then circled around to get back on the main road, and that at 1:20 when they passed back thru the intersection where they encountered the MB kids before, the MB kids were no longer there.  How did he know they weren't still there unless he did turn around, and why take the chance of being contradicted on that by the MB kids, when he didn't need to say they turned around to go to the lighthouse, he could have just said they got back on the main road somewhere past Choose A Name.  There are other little things too, like Deepak saying Satish put in the porno when they reached La Cabana, La Cabana is on the main road, they wouldn't pass it going to Joran's house.  And in one of the statements Art Wood gave to the NE it said one of the suspects got out to relieve themselves at Arashi beach (contradicting Deepak's original statement hat they didn't stop), was that said in case someone saw the car parked.  Joran first mentioned stopping at his house in order to incriminate 2K, as part of his 2nd story, that 2K droped him off at his house and drove off with Nat.  Maybe even after he changed his story to agree with 2K on the M beach dropoff, he just decided to stick with saying they went to his house for some reason, perhaps because he didn't want to admit lying about that, and to counter the idea that Nat thought he was staying at the HI.  

If they did take Nat to the lighthouse/Arashi beach, whatever happened there Nat had to still be alive when she left, because it's not plausable that Deepak would have been home chatting on his computer just minutes after witnessing her death.  Unless Deepak went home leaving her alive with Joran and/or Satish on Arashi beach, but that doesn't make much sense.

..
Over at BFN, there is the English translation of the Dutch version of AMW, the show that Holland did. In the show, they did mention going to the lighthouse. Deepak said, I guess in one of his statements that they stopped the car at Arashi Beach on the way back from the lighthouse as one of them had to relieve themselves. I don't know what the distance is from C & C's to the lighthouse. The car was spotted in front of Diamonds International on a camera at 1:18 ? it was said.
They were looking at quite a few different locations and also wanted any info from anyone who saw the car on hte way to Joran's.


In my opinion...that whole fiasco of the Dutch re-enactment was for show. So much was not even real, as far as we all know now as being truth. I do not trust Aruban/Dutch, period. They played that out carefully......there was a reason for that.


That whole Dutch re-enactment was a load of Van Der Sh@t!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 01:33:53 PM
ok....2:30 gardener sees them by the pond. 3 boys in the car...Dave says in his book..they may have been taking turns with her in the back seat...aaahhh!! makes me cringe putting it down in writing...my heart hurts!!

From there...head back to Joran's...phone records show he was 1st in vicinity of pond...then at home at 3am-ish...and Natalee gets her phone call in...could she have hit her head in the car?! Makes sense to me...thus the blood in the car...can't take her back to her hotel injured...so they take her back to Joran's to clean her up. If she wakes up in the car and begins to struggle...then very possible she hurt her self right there at the pond where they were all seen...also would coincide with statements that she fell or stumbled out of car "at hotel" and Joran getting out to help her.

ok...also strange Deepak brings up...was it in e-mail?...that she had fallen asleep in the car...so they drive up to lighthouse...there for a short time...she passes out...they intend to take her back to her hotel but decide to 1st pull in behind the pond and take advantage of her while she is passed out. She comes to...puts up a struggle..falls out of the car and hits her head...then they head back to Joran's to get her cleaned up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:35:26 PM
Here is the website for the law firm that Antonio Carlos works for:
http://www.sjiemfat.com/
I guess listing PVDS would be embarrassing


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:35:29 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Sleuth:

Thanks for that picture. Lots of treacherous-looking rocks, that's for sure. And so close to Koen's.


Yes.  Aruba has a huge contrast in beaches for such a small island.  Palm Beach (where the HI is, it is like a huge flat, shallow pool with no waves).  Eagle Beach to the south (LaCabana area, for example) has more waves (not for surfing, but more wave action than Palm).   Both Palm and Eagle are hard sand bottoms and great for swimming - no rocks, dropoffs, sandbars.  Then when you get up toward Malmok you get the rock coves - these areas are great for snorkeling, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 01:38:21 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!


Tee hee!  Carlo's office of course! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:39:10 PM
I have a theory:  Joran killed Natalee.  Paulus disposed of the body.  Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:39:59 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Sleuth wrote:
mishy wrote:
I will add that I was taking a computer class on the morning that Natalee missed her flight and my instructor was a Mtn Brook mom, who had just received word about Natalee on her email and told me about it. She said whoever emailed her said that they were searching for a "father and son" in relation to her disappearance...

It was weeks later when I heard speculation on the blogs or MSM that a "father" might have been involved...do I have that timeline right?


WOW Mishy, if that instructor had that on the day Natalee went missing, I wonder who she received the email from. If it was the morning Natalee went missing, that would have been PRIOR to Beth and Jug arriving and visiting the VDS property.

Spooky wrote:

wasnt that posted on that first tripadvisor post by the wife of one of the chaperones? i could be wrong. does anyone have those posts handy?

Does anybody else remember this tripadvisor post Spooky was talking about? I never went to tripadvisor...
_________________

... I went to RWV and got this, but it is not a copy of the original.
begin:
Also, Aruba and Travel Advisory message boards are abuzz over the disappearance, and one poster purportedly from Alabama posted the curious post below.

Alert: Just wanted to warn everyone: My best friend and her husband chaperoneed a senior trip of 160 kids down to Aruba, and she returned last night. Her husband had to stay b/c they think that one of the girls was kidnapped, and is possibly in Venezuela now. Her parents flew down, and the State Dept., DEA and several other groups are involved now. She left with a guy from Carlos and Charlie's, and the cops found out that he is a local drug dealer. Just wanted to let everyone know to please stay safe. If anyone in Aruba has any info., please let me know. I should know more later today. Just please say a prayer.

The above would fit with details in a report here claiming there were "disturbing" circumstances surrounding the disappearance which resulted in a request for ten additional agents of the FBI, now in Aruba. However, it should be noted that the bullentin board message can not be verified as genuine, or credible.

There was also another unconfirmed bullentin board report that some forensic evidence was gathered from a vehicle associated with the three men. It is known that at least some of the additional FBI support now involved in the search would be capable of evaluating such evidence; however, that is not unusual.

This post is also available at Blogger News Network.

end.

this was from the FP over there, dated June 5, 2005


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 01:40:01 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I have a theory:  Joran killed Natalee.  Paulus disposed of the body.  Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.


cut that out Easy!!! My eyes are the worse!!! haha


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: beachwego on July 09, 2006, 01:40:06 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't think Natalee wanted to see the "big house" or "sharks" or wanted to have sex with the "exchange student" from Holland.  She wanted to go back to her hotel with the Dutch kid who was also staying at the hotel.



Me too.  Everything else just clouds the issue and gets us off on wild goose chases....that always end up back where we started.   :?  :?  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 09, 2006, 01:40:13 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!


Tee hee!  Carlo's office of course! :lol:


 Perhaps he is HEAD DONG at the VIP club. ACKKKKKKKK!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 01:40:13 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I go back and forth but right now I am leaning toward 2K telling the truth that they actually went to the lighthouse not Joran's house.  In Deepak's June 9 statement he said they turned left off LG Smith toward Choose A Name, if they were going to Joran's house they would have just kept going in that direction.  However Deepak said they then circled around to get back on the main road, and that at 1:20 when they passed back thru the intersection where they encountered the MB kids before, the MB kids were no longer there.  How did he know they weren't still there unless he did turn around, and why take the chance of being contradicted on that by the MB kids, when he didn't need to say they turned around to go to the lighthouse, he could have just said they got back on the main road somewhere past Choose A Name.  There are other little things too, like Deepak saying Satish put in the porno when they reached La Cabana, La Cabana is on the main road, they wouldn't pass it going to Joran's house.  And in one of the statements Art Wood gave to the NE it said one of the suspects got out to relieve themselves at Arashi beach (contradicting Deepak's original statement hat they didn't stop), was that said in case someone saw the car parked.  Joran first mentioned stopping at his house in order to incriminate 2K, as part of his 2nd story, that 2K droped him off at his house and drove off with Nat.  Maybe even after he changed his story to agree with 2K on the M beach dropoff, he just decided to stick with saying they went to his house for some reason, perhaps because he didn't want to admit lying about that, and to counter the idea that Nat thought he was staying at the HI.  

If they did take Nat to the lighthouse/Arashi beach, whatever happened there Nat had to still be alive when she left, because it's not plausable that Deepak would have been home chatting on his computer just minutes after witnessing her death.  Unless Deepak went home leaving her alive with Joran and/or Satish on Arashi beach, but that doesn't make much sense.


Would've been on the C n' C video cam twice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 01:41:02 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Ono"
......attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


 :lol:  :lol:

I've heard about putting lipstick on a pig, but the silk purse is new to me   :lol:


 :?: No comprendo! :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:41:35 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Ono"
Sleuth:

Thanks for that picture. Lots of treacherous-looking rocks, that's for sure. And so close to Koen's.


Yes.  Aruba has a huge contrast in beaches for such a small island.  Palm Beach (where the HI is, it is like a huge flat, shallow pool with no waves).  Eagle Beach to the south (LaCabana area, for example) has more waves (not for surfing, but more wave action than Palm).   Both Palm and Eagle are hard sand bottoms and great for swimming - no rocks, dropoffs, sandbars.  Then when you get up toward Malmok you get the rock coves - these areas are great for snorkeling, etc.


A treasure trove of variety, for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 01:43:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?

Paulus?  YES he works for the same Law firm now as Joran's lawyer Carlos.


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdsholida3.jpg)


A total dishonor to the Bar. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:43:46 PM
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:44:30 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!


Tee hee!  Carlo's office of course! :lol:


 Perhaps he is HEAD DONG at the VIP club. ACKKKKKKKK!!


If he is tending bar at C-n-C's................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:46:13 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.


I think that is basically it, but what happened afterward is the true mystery.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 01:46:54 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Morning all ...

Have not had time to listen to the PodCast but have read the transcript.
Just making a qucik post & go  (sorry)

I was sure hoping Dana & Art could have confirmed one way or the
other  who was staying in the JVDS house hold  Sunday / Monday. :cry:

IF younger brother(s) were home... to me less chance of cover-up activities occuring there yet makes you question Monday night. when police arrive and Papa heads out with ALE to the casino.
Did anyone see people peeking out the windows when police were talking in the front yard with MB group?
JMO  of course

Sorry for the post & run...   catch ya later
SeeeeeYaaaaByeeeeeeeee


As a Latina I can tell ya...OOOO YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:47:26 PM
Does Chinese water torture really work?  Just curious…..   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:48:02 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas

At Joran's bday party at KIA, I remember Jaime and Sander in pics in the parking lot.  Was Koen or Freddy there??  Do I remember this correctly??


Not sure, I think it was Jaime and Freddy but I could be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 01:48:02 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Ono"
......attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


 :lol:  :lol:

I've heard about putting lipstick on a pig, but the silk purse is new to me   :lol:


 :?: No comprendo! :?:


Here is the explanation from one site:

Can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear

Be unable to turn something ugly or inferior into something attractive or of value, as in No matter how expensive his clothes, he still looks sloppy—you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. This expression was already a proverb in the mid-1500s.



Source: http://www.answers.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:48:34 PM
JORAN'S SUMMER JOB  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:48:39 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.

I think that is basically it, but what happened afterward is the true mystery.

I doubt that Natalee is anywhere near the VDS compound. It would be too much like "The Telltale Heart" by Poe. It would make Paul go slowly crazy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:49:26 PM
KLAAS:   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:50:16 PM
Here is a link to Trip Advisor : Ashley79 was the one who was providing the info:
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g147247-i144-k158081-Aruba-Aruba.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:50:52 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.


By Two June, Tito Lacle is already going with the program, as per his AP article of same date he is promoting the HI line;  By Three June, van der Straaten is calling it a crime; Four June, KJ has already said "no" to help from the United States, while Dompig-nia is asking us to hold our breath for 48 hours...The program was in force already.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:52:19 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I have a theory:  ( I could see it  :wink: ) Joran killed Natalee.  Paulus disposed of the body.  Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.


Could be - and hence why no one seems to be paying for their own lawyer fees


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:52:29 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
KLAAS:   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I love the clown outfit. I asked Carpe to do one of Dompig and he did. sometimes, you just gotta have a laff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:52:53 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.

I think that is basically it, but what happened afterward is the true mystery.

I doubt that Natalee is anywhere near the VDS compound. It would be too much like "The Telltale Heart" by Poe. It would make Paul go slowly crazy.


Deep water far away from the van der sloot reality.  Paulus would also be seeing ghost, if she was at his backdoor.  The sweat would run cold and profuse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 01:53:04 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.


I think that is basically it, but what happened afterward is the true mystery.


Mystery equal cover-up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 01:53:15 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Does Chinese water torture really work? Just curious…..



I don't know, but a 45 stuck in your ear does! :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:53:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN'S SUMMER JOB  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)


ROTFL!!!!!!!! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:53:45 PM
I relistened to the Greta interview with Anita and her husband.  She didn't call him Paulus or Paul in that interview - just "my husband"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 01:53:59 PM
what do you think guys...

I just keep going back to where the most 'evidence" (what little is left) points to...and I think I have to conclude the following...

2:30ish at the pond area
1) gardner reliable witness and passed polygraph
2) it court records phone call was made by Joran about that time and the triangulation of call puts him in that area.

makes alot of sense to me too...if she passes out at lighthouse...they start to take her back to her hotel but stop there to take advantage of her. I am starting to think this is the scene of most of the crime!!

She hits her head struggling to get out of the car as she is coming to.

3:00ish they are back at Joran's

1) again court records according to David Koch shows another call from Joran's cell and now he is in vicinity of his own home.
2)Natalee get's in a call with the screeching monkey in the background.

So now they have taken advantage of her...she has hit her head trying to get out of car in the pond area...can't take her back to hotel...everyone would know what happened...they have been seen by gardner...so they head back to Joran's to regroup and figure out what to do next with the injured Natalee.

I really think at this point...because they are so casual about what they are doing..ie logging on computer etc...they intended to let her sleep it off while they figured a story to tell the next day and Natalee expired once they had put her to bed.
would explain the DNA evidence in Joran's room that Jossy was sure they found but then dissappeared
and Klaas...can you help me here...was it reported they got a new mattress that was delivered by the furniture truck or was that speculation?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:54:05 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Here is a link to Trip Advisor : Ashley79 was the one who was providing the info:
http://www.tripadvisor.com/ShowTopic-g147247-i144-k158081-Aruba-Aruba.html


Thanks Kat_Gram:

ashley79
      
Posted on: 1:37 pm, May 31, 2005   Report inappropriate post
Just wanted to warn everyone:
My best friend and her husband chaperoned a senior trip of 160 kids down to Aruba, and she returned last night. Her husband had to stay b/c they think that one of the girls was kidnapped, and is possibly in Venezuela now. Her parents flew down, and the State Dept., DEA and several other groups are involved now. She left with a guy from Carlos and Charlie's, and the cops found out that he is a local drug dealer. Just wanted to let everyone know to please stay safe. If anyone in Aruba has any info., please let me know. I should know more later today. Just please say a prayer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 01:54:18 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.


I think that is basically it, but what happened afterward is the true mystery.

Yup.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 01:54:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN'S SUMMER JOB  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)


lol lol lol  Talk about your biggie size!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 01:54:53 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?

Paulus?  YES he works for the same Law firm now as Joran's lawyer Carlos.


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdsholida3.jpg)


A total dishonor to the Bar. :roll:

That depends on which bar.  He looks like a drunk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 01:55:29 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
what do you think guys...

I just keep going back to where the most 'evidence" (what little is left) points to...and I think I have to conclude the following...

2:30ish at the pond area
1) gardner reliable witness and passed polygraph
2) it court records phone call was made by Joran about that time and the triangulation of call puts him in that area.

makes alot of sense to me too...if she passes out at lighthouse...they start to take her back to her hotel but stop there to take advantage of her. I am starting to think this is the scene of most of the crime!!

She hits her head struggling to get out of the car as she is coming to.

3:00ish they are back at Joran's

1) again court records according to David Koch shows another call from Joran's cell and now he is in vicinity of his own home.
2)Natalee get's in a call with the screeching monkey in the background.

So now they have taken advantage of her...she has hit her head trying to get out of car in the pond area...can't take her back to hotel...everyone would know what happened...they have been seen by gardner...so they head back to Joran's to regroup and figure out what to do next with the injured Natalee.

I really think at this point...because they are so casual about what they are doing..ie logging on computer etc...they intended to let her sleep it off while they figured a story to tell the next day and Natalee expired once they had put her to bed.
would explain the DNA evidence in Joran's room that Jossy was sure they found but then dissappeared
and Klaas...can you help me here...was it reported they got a new mattress that was delivered by the furniture truck or was that speculation?


I believe speculation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:55:43 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Easy wrote: Joran killed Natalee. Paulus disposed of the body. Kalpoes were warned to keep quiet, or pay the price.
I agree - that's why Joran was away from the house most of the day on Monday, May 30th while Paul worked out the details and then called the Kalpoes and Joran to come to Montanja19 to learn law lesson 101 around the pool.

I think that is basically it, but what happened afterward is the true mystery.

I doubt that Natalee is anywhere near the VDS compound. It would be too much like "The Telltale Heart" by Poe. It would make Paul go slowly crazy.


Or perspire profusely perhaps ???????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 01:55:52 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?


I am intrigued that you call him Paul. I have read many threads here and in other places that call him Paulus.......PLUS, if I remember correctly, there was a video somewhere of even Anita calling him Paulus'....not Paul. I am sure Klaas has that on file. Then recently I read that his name is not paulus, and that he should be called paul. NOT that this info is important in anyway........but it is interesting. I DO REMEMBER in one interview that even ANITA called him PAULUS.....not paul....anyone else remember that??


Funny you should mention that.  Early on a friend of mine in Aruba would always refer to him as Paul.  I asked about that and was told most people called him Paul.  I guess it is kind of like Michael and Mike.  My wives always called me Michael for some reason, but friends call me Mike or a$$hole.   8)


My son is Michael we call him Mikey.  When that kiddo has man-spurts he asks to be called Mike. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Ono"
......attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


 :lol:  :lol:

I've heard about putting lipstick on a pig, but the silk purse is new to me   :lol:


 :?: No comprendo! :?:


Used as a phrase when trying to make something look pretty that just can not be done ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 01:56:53 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I relistened to the Greta interview with Anita and her husband.  She didn't call him Paulus or Paul in that interview - just "my husband"


With Greta and  Beth, the oinker called him "the judge."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 01:56:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN'S SUMMER JOB  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: That's more like it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 01:57:43 PM
Ya don't think that Joran might be working for Aruba Today as a gopher for Ms Renfro and Mr Lacle.    I think he owes them big time!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 01:58:01 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I relistened to the Greta interview with Anita and her husband.  She didn't call him Paulus or Paul in that interview - just "my husband"


 8)  Did she say: "That SOB?"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 01:58:21 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Ya don't think that Joran might be working for Aruba Today as a gopher for Ms Renfro and Mr Lacle.    I think he owes them big time!


He may have already been working for them and paid the ultimate price. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 02:00:09 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
what do you think guys...

I just keep going back to where the most 'evidence" (what little is left) points to...and I think I have to conclude the following...

2:30ish at the pond area
1) gardner reliable witness and passed polygraph
2) it court records phone call was made by Joran about that time and the triangulation of call puts him in that area.

makes alot of sense to me too...if she passes out at lighthouse...they start to take her back to her hotel but stop there to take advantage of her. I am starting to think this is the scene of most of the crime!!

She hits her head struggling to get out of the car as she is coming to.

3:00ish they are back at Joran's

1) again court records according to David Koch shows another call from Joran's cell and now he is in vicinity of his own home.
2)Natalee get's in a call with the screeching monkey in the background.

So now they have taken advantage of her...she has hit her head trying to get out of car in the pond area...can't take her back to hotel...everyone would know what happened...they have been seen by gardner...so they head back to Joran's to regroup and figure out what to do next with the injured Natalee.

I really think at this point...because they are so casual about what they are doing..ie logging on computer etc...they intended to let her sleep it off while they figured a story to tell the next day and Natalee expired once they had put her to bed.
would explain the DNA evidence in Joran's room that Jossy was sure they found but then dissappeared
and Klaas...can you help me here...was it reported they got a new mattress that was delivered by the furniture truck or was that speculation?


just to continue a moment...Joran is on computer...still too casual...don't think he suspects anything other than Natalee is sleeping it off and they are trying to come up with a plan so they don't get accused of raping her. Logs off about 3:30ish...goes back to his apartment...tries to wake her up and get her back to her hotel...and maybe the plan was to take her back at this point and leave her abandoned on the beach!!...but he finds she has expired...now another rush of activity!!!
4am...Paulus is out and about by McD's
Deepak frantically washing his car
is this when the 8 1/2 minute phone call happens?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 02:00:46 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I relistened to the Greta interview with Anita and her husband.  She didn't call him Paulus or Paul in that interview - just "my husband"


With Greta and  Beth, the oinker called him "the judge."

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:00:50 PM
ono wrote:
Quote
Or perspire profusely perhaps ???????



I thought Greta should have thrown him a life preserver when she interviewed them at the house. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:01:19 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I relistened to the Greta interview with Anita and her husband.  She didn't call him Paulus or Paul in that interview - just "my husband"


With Greta and  Beth, the oinker called him "the judge."


LOL! The sow in question?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 02:01:33 PM
I have other names for Paulus van der Sloot but, for the sake of decency, I will refer to him as Paul or PVDS and not piece of very disgusting *hit.    It has been over a year of this garbage and I want answers and action.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on July 09, 2006, 02:01:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN'S SUMMER JOB  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)


Oh my GOD!!!!!!!!!!!! That is so perfect.  Klaas - that is worthy of the SM Hall of Fame for sure.  Love it love it love it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:02:21 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Does Paul have a job?


I am intrigued that you call him Paul. I have read many threads here and in other places that call him Paulus.......PLUS, if I remember correctly, there was a video somewhere of even Anita calling him Paulus'....not Paul. I am sure Klaas has that on file. Then recently I read that his name is not paulus, and that he should be called paul. NOT that this info is important in anyway........but it is interesting. I DO REMEMBER in one interview that even ANITA called him PAULUS.....not paul....anyone else remember that??


Funny you should mention that.  Early on a friend of mine in Aruba would always refer to him as Paul.  I asked about that and was told most people called him Paul.  I guess it is kind of like Michael and Mike.  My wives always called me Michael for some reason, but friends call me Mike or a$$hole.   8)


My son is Michael we call him Mikey.  When that kiddo has man-spurts he asks to be called Mike. :lol:


There are only a couple of living people that ever called me Mikey.  :twisted:  That's a joke! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 09, 2006, 02:02:50 PM
Previous post:

AZsunny wrote:
Posted on: 11:11 pm, Jun 28, 2005 Report inappropriate post

arubagirl wrote:
Can I ask a question. If somebody told me that they saw the brothers doing something suspicious but not illegal in and of itself, should I tell the cops? Even though a month has passed. I want to emphasize that I did not see it, but it was told to me. I assumed that this person told the cops, but turns out that that didn't happen.
Don't know if anyone's been to SM tonight -

She apparently posted this on SM...this is from tripadvisor... this is in regard to her frined seeing the Deepak car at 2am heading in the wrong direction.

Klaas...can we still access this.... the post I read last night won't open today.


AG's first post on this sighting is here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=41570#41570

arubagirl
Magnificent Monkey
Joined: 13 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close.

Discussion and advice for her to convince her friend to go to the police continues on RBN #31 and #32, I believe.
_________________
Truth is a shining goddess, always veiled, always distant, never wholly approachable, but worthy of all the devotion of which the human spirit is capable--Bertrand Russell
 
Back to top    
 

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:03:14 PM
Frijole wrote:
Quote
Oh my GOD!!!!!!!!!!!! That is so perfect. Klaas - that is worthy of the SM Hall of Fame for sure. Love it love it love it.


Don't laugh, but if I was Ronald McDonald............I'd sue her. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:03:33 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Ya don't think that Joran might be working for Aruba Today as a gopher for Ms Renfro and Mr Lacle.    I think he owes them big time!


 :lol: Maybe so...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:03:54 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
JORAN'S SUMMER JOB  :lol:  :lol:


lol lol lol  Talk about your biggie size!


 :lol:  :lol: You guys are too funny.  

At least when he gets off work at 4 am - oh, I mean 10 pm - he can call Paulus/Paul to come pick him up....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:05:48 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
ono wrote:
Quote
Or perspire profusely perhaps ???????



I thought Greta should have thrown him a life preserver when she interviewed them at the house. :lol:


No kidding...and I wondered at the time if he was wearing any deoderant? :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:06:04 PM
Sleuth wrote:
Quote
At least when he gets off work at 4 am - oh, I mean 10 pm - he can call Paulus/Paul to come pick him up....


He wouldn't work there, he couldn't wear that damned plaid shirt. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:06:31 PM
Hi Mikey   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 02:06:36 PM
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:07:32 PM
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:08:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
what do you think guys...

(snip)
and Klaas...can you help me here...was it reported they got a new mattress that was delivered by the furniture truck or was that speculation?


I believe speculation.


Speculation - other reports was that it was a bookcase...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 02:08:39 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
ono wrote:
Quote
Or perspire profusely perhaps ???????



I thought Greta should have thrown him a life preserver when she interviewed them at the house. :lol:


No doubt, she did, in her interview with his spawn, Joran.  I say no life preserver is better than Greta agreeing with the sporter in a flirting kind of way and calling Beth to tell her she believes the Sporter & Paulus over Beth.  How much better life preserver do you want?!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 02:08:53 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


Montanja is where the VDS home is.  So the vehicle was seen driving in the towards the VDS home and not towards the Kalpoe home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:09:05 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Houdini"
ono wrote:
Quote
Or perspire profusely perhaps ???????



I thought Greta should have thrown him a life preserver when she interviewed them at the house. :lol:


No kidding...and I wondered at the time if he was wearing any deoderant? :?


LOL! I meant "deodorant....." :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 09, 2006, 02:09:45 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I go back and forth but right now I am leaning toward 2K telling the truth that they actually went to the lighthouse not Joran's house.  In Deepak's June 9 statement he said they turned left off LG Smith toward Choose A Name, if they were going to Joran's house they would have just kept going in that direction.  However Deepak said they then circled around to get back on the main road, and that at 1:20 when they passed back thru the intersection where they encountered the MB kids before, the MB kids were no longer there.  How did he know they weren't still there unless he did turn around, and why take the chance of being contradicted on that by the MB kids, when he didn't need to say they turned around to go to the lighthouse, he could have just said they got back on the main road somewhere past Choose A Name.  There are other little things too, like Deepak saying Satish put in the porno when they reached La Cabana, La Cabana is on the main road, they wouldn't pass it going to Joran's house.  And in one of the statements Art Wood gave to the NE it said one of the suspects got out to relieve themselves at Arashi beach (contradicting Deepak's original statement hat they didn't stop), was that said in case someone saw the car parked.  Joran first mentioned stopping at his house in order to incriminate 2K, as part of his 2nd story, that 2K droped him off at his house and drove off with Nat.  Maybe even after he changed his story to agree with 2K on the M beach dropoff, he just decided to stick with saying they went to his house for some reason, perhaps because he didn't want to admit lying about that, and to counter the idea that Nat thought he was staying at the HI.  

If they did take Nat to the lighthouse/Arashi beach, whatever happened there Nat had to still be alive when she left, because it's not plausable that Deepak would have been home chatting on his computer just minutes after witnessing her death.  Unless Deepak went home leaving her alive with Joran and/or Satish on Arashi beach, but that doesn't make much sense.


Would've been on the C n' C video cam twice.


No cam at CnCs, if you mean the DI cam, it was facing Werf Street (street beind Cncs) not the main road, so unfortunately no way to verify which way they went on the main road.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 02:10:28 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:10:56 PM
ONO wrote:
Quote
LOL! I meant "deodorant....."



Well, that stinks! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:11:05 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


That could be the route past Choose-A-Name to the VDS residence in Montanja.    Or one never knows, did they go toward Koen (past LaCabana per Charles Croes account), and then from there went toward Montanja.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:11:12 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Houdini"
ono wrote:
Quote
Or perspire profusely perhaps ???????



I thought Greta should have thrown him a life preserver when she interviewed them at the house. :lol:


No doubt, she did, in her interview with his spawn, Joran.  I say no life preserver is better than Greta agreeing with the sporter in a flirting kind of way and calling Beth to tell her she believes the Sporter & Paulus over Beth.  How much better life preserver do you want?!?


Well, that's true. She waited awhile to toss it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on July 09, 2006, 02:11:13 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Sleuth wrote:
Quote
At least when he gets off work at 4 am - oh, I mean 10 pm - he can call Paulus/Paul to come pick him up....


He wouldn't work there, he couldn't wear that damned plaid shirt. :roll:


So true Houdini---- frankly I think the first 3 words sum up Our Dear Sporter.... "He wouldn't work".  No way is he working.  He is a lazy, spoiled brat.  Oh yeah and a sociopath.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:11:41 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Hi Mikey   :wink:


I'm coming after you!  The legend goes that I will eat anything once and I didn't explode after putting those Pop Rocks in my mouth and drinking a Pepsi! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 02:12:15 PM
Anna - just to verify, I have the posts copied as well:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/arubagirlcarwash.gif)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/arubagirlcarwash2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 09, 2006, 02:12:43 PM
Easy wrote:
Quote
but friends call me Mike or a$$hole.


I'm just fine with referring to Paulus/Paul as "A$$hole."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on July 09, 2006, 02:12:58 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


WOw, I didn't know there were any refugees left at the camp.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 02:13:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.

I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


Montanja is where the VDS home is.  So the vehicle was seen driving in the towards the VDS home and not towards the Kalpoe home.

Now was Natalee in the car at that point or was she dropped off already and the Kalpoes picking up someone else.  In Beth's statment she has Joran took Natalee to his home at 1:40 am.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 02:13:39 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Looks like Joe Taco is going to be a very busy man suing everyone who hates Paulus and Anita, and their spawn.  He will have to indeed enlarge his practice, needs about 100,000 lawyers and to think how busy they will be in the next presidential election probably leaves little time for claims against internet anonymous faces when they can make more money suing someone over the outcome of the elections.  

Of course, Easy has so much money, I am sure it would exceed anything the legions of Democrats and Republicans could give lawyers. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:13:42 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


GOOD!
Hey Joey Boy, I live in Alabama.  Come get me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:14:15 PM
Frijole wrote:
Quote
So true Houdini---- frankly I think the first 3 words sum up Our Dear Sporter.... "He wouldn't work". No way is he working. He is a lazy, spoiled brat. Oh yeah and a sociopath.


Other than that, he's a nice guy. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:14:36 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Sleuth wrote:
Quote
At least when he gets off work at 4 am - oh, I mean 10 pm - he can call Paulus/Paul to come pick him up....


He wouldn't work there, he couldn't wear that damned plaid shirt. :roll:


So true Houdini---- frankly I think the first 3 words sum up Our Dear Sporter.... "He wouldn't work".  No way is he working.  He is a lazy, spoiled brat.  Oh yeah and a sociopath.


I could see him working...if it led to a method of meeting girls.   Like CnC or Tattoo or Champions Bar or Cyberzone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:14:53 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm going to go wash the cobwebs out of my head.
Hiya' Whyte! I miss Tink, too. I hope the avatars will be back soon.

Easy............I, too, would like to know about Joran's summer job on Aruba. It surprises me he would choose to come back, but maybe it's cheaper on his parents to house him at home. I wonder who would hire him.
They could always hire him out in a freak show.

Have a great one, Monkeys!


Tee hee!  Carlo's office of course! :lol:


 Perhaps he is HEAD DONG at the VIP club. ACKKKKKKKK!!


If he is tending bar at C-n-C's................


Bonsai would've sent the exclusive to Klaas!!! 8)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:14:55 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Who is Sue You? Is she Chinese? 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 02:14:57 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".

WOw, I didn't know there were any refugees left at the camp.

Very few refugees with many forum names.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 02:15:15 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


WOw, I didn't know there were any refugees left at the camp.


Glenda, Siddalee and Medley and all their various names.  Multiply 3 an infinite number of times.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 02:16:04 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
ldstlou wrote:
what do you think guys...

I just keep going back to where the most 'evidence" (what little is left) points to...and I think I have to conclude the following...

2:30ish at the pond area
1) gardner reliable witness and passed polygraph
2) it court records phone call was made by Joran about that time and the triangulation of call puts him in that area.

makes alot of sense to me too...if she passes out at lighthouse...they start to take her back to her hotel but stop there to take advantage of her. I am starting to think this is the scene of most of the crime!!

She hits her head struggling to get out of the car as she is coming to.

3:00ish they are back at Joran's

1) again court records according to David Koch shows another call from Joran's cell and now he is in vicinity of his own home.
2)Natalee get's in a call with the screeching monkey in the background.

So now they have taken advantage of her...she has hit her head trying to get out of car in the pond area...can't take her back to hotel...everyone would know what happened...they have been seen by gardner...so they head back to Joran's to regroup and figure out what to do next with the injured Natalee.

I really think at this point...because they are so casual about what they are doing..ie logging on computer etc...they intended to let her sleep it off while they figured a story to tell the next day and Natalee expired once they had put her to bed.
would explain the DNA evidence in Joran's room that Jossy was sure they found but then dissappeared

just to continue a moment...Joran is on computer...still too casual...don't think he suspects anything other than Natalee is sleeping it off and they are trying to come up with a plan so they don't get accused of raping her. Logs off about 3:30ish...goes back to his apartment...tries to wake her up and get her back to her hotel...and maybe the plan was to take her back at this point and leave her abandoned on the beach!!...but he finds she has expired...now another rush of activity!!!
4am...Paulus is out and about by McD's
Deepak frantically washing his car
is this when the 8 1/2 minute phone call happens?

I think this is my final theory...to me...makes sense...can explain so much of what was said with this...going to work more detail in as time allows (when the painting is done!! haha)

comments?

I just think we all forgot about the pond area!! Very crucial I think!!
What else do we know about the pond area? Was't it just recently said by Jossy or Art that half way through draining..it appeared they found eveidence and police were scurrying!! Sorry...remember I paiting until 3am..posted at 4am..haha not much sleep!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on July 09, 2006, 02:16:20 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Who is Sue You? Is she Chinese? 8)


ROFLMAO   Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:16:26 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
ONO wrote:
Quote
LOL! I meant "deodorant....."



Well, that stinks! :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: P U is right!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:16:32 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Hi Mikey   :wink:


I'm coming after you!  The legend goes that I will eat anything once and I didn't explode after putting those Pop Rocks in my mouth and drinking a Pepsi! lol


Come on over, I always like a challenge.   Jossy wouldn't live all that far from me - you could visit with him at the same time   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 02:17:03 PM
oh my gosh!!! did I do that...so sorry Klaas!!!!! :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 02:17:41 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Of course, Easy has so much money, I am sure it would exceed anything the legions of Democrats and Republicans could give lawyers. :wink:

Hey Easy-you like older women? :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:18:51 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"

WOw, I didn't know there were any refugees left at the camp.


Klaas noticed last night that there was no one logged on to the site, and there was not a thread to cover last night's program.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 02:18:54 PM
The Refugees are just going over last nights Dana interview now.  There was nobody logged on to Refugees last night durring the show or right after it.  The rats are jumping ship.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:19:30 PM
Klaas  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:21:06 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Who is Sue You? Is she Chinese? 8)


I think I was married to Soo Yoo one time, but I'm not certain...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:23:42 PM
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:23:57 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Of course, Easy has so much money, I am sure it would exceed anything the legions of Democrats and Republicans could give lawyers. :wink:

Hey Easy-you like older women? :)


Only if they have lots of money!  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:24:31 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Who is Sue You? Is she Chinese? 8)


I think I was married to Soo Yoo one time, but I'm not certain...


 8) Oh, I know who you mean now, that woman named Sue You Yoo. Yeah, she's Cinese. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:25:37 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Who is Sue You? Is she Chinese? 8)


I think I was married to Soo Yoo one time, but I'm not certain...


 8) Oh, I know who you mean now, that woman named Sue You Yoo. Yeah, she's Cinese. 8)


 8)  :lol:  8) ....."Chinese"  I think she moved away a year ago.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 02:25:51 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!

I'm going to look at it a different way.  Maybe O'Douls had a medical problem the shelter wasn't aware of.  I think it was gods way of not allowing you to go through the sadness again of loosing a pet.  It was not meant to be for a reason, you will find the right one...I know you will!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on July 09, 2006, 02:26:36 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Frijole"

WOw, I didn't know there were any refugees left at the camp.


Klaas noticed last night that there was no one logged on to the site, and there was not a thread to cover last night's program.


Ahem.... I think that most of them work at night.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:27:10 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 02:29:40 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


I KNEW I should have asked my 6 year old to say the prayer...he is in much better with God than I!!! haha really almost asked him!! Your kitty is coming!! I just KNOW it!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 02:29:49 PM
Easy:

Sue You, Soo Yoo, and Sue You Yoo are cousins.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:30:28 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Ono"
......attempt to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.


 :lol:  :lol:

I've heard about putting lipstick on a pig, but the silk purse is new to me   :lol:


 :?: No comprendo! :?:


Used as a phrase when trying to make something look pretty that just can not be done ...


We have one in Spanish like that:

"La mona aunque se vista de seda mona se queda".

Translation:

"Even if the monkey is dressed in silk she is still a monkey"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 02:31:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!

I'm going to look at it a different way.  Maybe O'Douls had a medical problem the shelter wasn't aware of.  I think it was gods way of not allowing you to go through the sadness again of loosing a pet.  It was not meant to be for a reason, you will find the right one...I know you will!


I was thinking the same thing!! Just didn't want to curse the poor little kitty!! haha Your kitty is coming!! and a HEALTHY one this time!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 02:34:03 PM
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:35:11 PM
Interesting  Front Page Blog from April....

This ties in with what Art said last night in regards to whether Dompig resigned or was fired...

The Never Ending Saga of Dompig’s Demotion, Removal, Request To Leave from the Natalee Holloway Case
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/04/07/the-never-ending-saga-of-dompigs-demotion-removal-request-to-leave-from-the-natalee-holloway-case/
April 7, 2006


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 02:35:28 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Frijole"

WOw, I didn't know there were any refugees left at the camp.


Klaas noticed last night that there was no one logged on to the site, and there was not a thread to cover last night's program.


Ahem.... I think that most of them work at night.   :wink:

Really ? Doing what ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:35:49 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Easy:

Sue You, Soo Yoo, and Sue You Yoo are cousins.


Weren't they backup singers for Hoo Hoo Boo Boo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:37:02 PM
Ono wrote:
Quote
Sue You, Soo Yoo, and Sue You Yoo are cousins.


All members of the Who Sue Who Klan.  Very popular during the Kaching Dynasty.

There was an inner revolution because the two brothers "Me Sue You", and "I Sue You Too" were cheated out of their inheritance.

The rest is history. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:38:41 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on July 09, 2006, 02:38:45 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:

and scorps in the tub ~ you're going to be a bathroom monitor  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 02:39:11 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T
It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.
Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.
And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:

I always check the bowl, because one day I found a mouse swimming in circles like something out of Alice in Wonderland.  It was a freezing cold winter day so I scooped the rodent out with a coffee can and pored off the excess water leaving him in the coffee can in the bathroom sink.  He was exhausted and I thought he was near death so I left him until I could decide what to do.  When I returned to the bathroom-he was gone!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:40:39 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.


And wouldn't it be sumtin if after the unexpected, there was a prince in da bowl. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:40:48 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
 
"Even if the monkey is dressed in silk she is still a monkey"



Instructions for how to measure the money for the silk dress :wink:

(http://www.sewsimplymonkey.com/sitebuilder/images/measure-417x440.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 02:41:15 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/ssrefugeeS.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 02:41:43 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:43:01 PM
LOL Klaas on the photo..


Kat_Gram...I think Frijole was just joking...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 02:43:35 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T
It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.
Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.
And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:

I always check the bowl, because one day I found a mouse swimming in circles like something out of Alice in Wonderland.  It was a freezing cold winter day so I scooped the rodent out with a coffee can and pored off the excess water leaving him in the coffee can in the bathroom sink.  He was exhausted and I thought he was near death so I left him until I could decide what to do.  When I returned to the bathroom-he was gone!


Eeekkk!!!!

At least the frog was easily taken care of. Hubby scooped him out in a big plastic cup and freed him into the wild where Terry's raccoons live.

Raccoons don't EAT frogs do they? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 02:44:48 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.


And wouldn't it be sumtin if after the unexpected, there was a prince in da bowl. :shock:


Ssshhh....don't let Thirdstrike hear you say that. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 02:46:51 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
LOL Klaas on the photo..


Kat_Gram...I think Frijole was just joking...

I think I knew that, but I wanted some funnies. I am all out of them today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:47:18 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


Go ahead fren!  Pref. males...

BTW...any kids with Soo Yoo? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:48:53 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Sue You, Soo Yoo, and Sue You Yoo are cousins.


All members of the Who Sue Who Klan.  Very popular during the Kaching Dynasty.

There was an inner revolution because the two brothers "Me Sue You", and "I Sue You Too" were cheated out of their inheritance.

The rest is history. :lol:


Weren't Hoo Hoo's a chocolate treat guaranteed to raise the BP?

What upset the Refugees about my post?  Was it the "kneecap" thing?  Personally, I think it is a good idea and I would like to start with those jerks.  Bring it on  RU, but you better clean your cesspool before you threaten anyone!  Nothing is hidden on the internet.  It is just disguised and your board is the most vile, slanderous, defamation that exist.

Bring it on you clowns and you will get it three times as hard!  Please, bring it on!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:51:53 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


I KNEW I should have asked my 6 year old to say the prayer...he is in much better with God than I!!! haha really almost asked him!! Your kitty is coming!! I just KNOW it!!


Been praying since yesterday, I asked Mikey to pray for me, geesh!  I say there is a curse in this house where I can only keep one cat. Any other pet that comes into the house asides from KC ends up sick or dead.  I don't get it!  We've spent hundreds in vet bills, it's not like we don't care!

When I had all five kids in here I babysat four hermit crabs...those were the most spoiled crabs ever!  Did you know they love Cheerios?  :shock:   I gave my nice a zip lock with sea salt to sprinkle on their drinking water and they went over to the shell with water more than the damp sponge.

They are very easy to take care of pets...if a kid asks for a pet consider a hermit crab.  To me, way better than turtles!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:52:56 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
 
BTW...any kids with Soo Yoo? :wink:


And if so, is the name Soo Mee?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 02:54:23 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I hate to be prejudicial, but there is something about that lying face that makes me want to break kneecaps, until I hear one word of truth.

Over at RU, someone is adding this to the "Info for Joe T's Sue You List".


Who is Sue You? Is she Chinese? 8)


I think I was married to Soo Yoo one time, but I'm not certain...


 8) Oh, I know who you mean now, that woman named Sue You Yoo. Yeah, she's Cinese. 8)


 8)  :lol:  8) ....."Chinese"  I think she moved away a year ago.


Well, that puts a new "slant" on the story!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 02:55:01 PM
For our PA monkeys...

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/bella_in_steelers_dress-300x194.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:55:29 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


Should've kissed him....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:55:50 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Weren't Hoo Hoo's a chocolate treat guaranteed to raise the BP?


You mean Ho Ho's?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:57:05 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
 
"Even if the monkey is dressed in silk she is still a monkey"



Instructions for how to measure the money for the silk dress :wink:

(http://www.sewsimplymonkey.com/sitebuilder/images/measure-417x440.jpg)



OOOkay you made me laugh!!!  I needed that!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 02:57:23 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Well, that puts a new "slant" on the story!


That's just "ornamental".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 02:59:31 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Just imagine Mr. BT walking in the bathroom with such a scene...

Mrs. BT rappin' along the song, "It Wasn't Me"... :P  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 03:01:10 PM
Sleuth wrote:
Quote
And if so, is the name Soo Mee?


If it was a boy he would be named    "Soo He".

And a girl would be named   "Noo Soo".

Of course if Sue had been from Iraq, she would have been named  Ali Mony.........but I digress. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:01:23 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


I KNEW I should have asked my 6 year old to say the prayer...he is in much better with God than I!!! haha really almost asked him!! Your kitty is coming!! I just KNOW it!!


Been praying since yesterday, I asked Mikey to pray for me, geesh!  I say there is a curse in this house where I can only keep one cat. Any other pet that comes into the house asides from KC ends up sick or dead.  I don't get it!  We've spent hundreds in vet bills, it's not like we don't care!

When I had all five kids in here I babysat four hermit crabs...those were the most spoiled crabs ever!  Did you know they love Cheerios?  :shock:   I gave my nice a zip lock with sea salt to sprinkle on their drinking water and they went over to the shell with water more than the damp sponge.

They are very easy to take care of pets...if a kid asks for a pet consider a hermit crab.  To me, way better than turtles!


Good with garlic/butter too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 03:04:18 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
For our PA monkeys...

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/bella_in_steelers_dress-300x194.jpg)



KEWL!!!!!!!!!!!!  THANKS!!!  Showed it to Mr. Whyte and the kids.

Well, there ya go...still a monkey!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 03:06:35 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


I KNEW I should have asked my 6 year old to say the prayer...he is in much better with God than I!!! haha really almost asked him!! Your kitty is coming!! I just KNOW it!!


Been praying since yesterday, I asked Mikey to pray for me, geesh!  I say there is a curse in this house where I can only keep one cat. Any other pet that comes into the house asides from KC ends up sick or dead.  I don't get it!  We've spent hundreds in vet bills, it's not like we don't care!

When I had all five kids in here I babysat four hermit crabs...those were the most spoiled crabs ever!  Did you know they love Cheerios?  :shock:   I gave my nice a zip lock with sea salt to sprinkle on their drinking water and they went over to the shell with water more than the damp sponge.

They are very easy to take care of pets...if a kid asks for a pet consider a hermit crab.  To me, way better than turtles!


Good with garlic/butter too!


You better protect those kneecaps of yours, buddy, I am an animal lover! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 03:07:55 PM
Does anybody know why the pot is down?  Has been down for days, been checking and I get two messages that I am forbidden from it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:09:09 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Weren't Hoo Hoo's a chocolate treat guaranteed to raise the BP?


You mean Ho Ho's?


Well, I wasn't going to talk about that Ho Ho!  But, since you brought it up.... She was kinda sweet and tasted like chocolate.  I remember her well and it still makes my yoo yoo hoo hoo...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 03:13:50 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Well, I wasn't going to talk about that Ho Ho! But, since you brought it up.... She was kinda sweet and tasted like chocolate. I remember her well and it still makes my yoo yoo hoo hoo...


Did she sing "If you'll be my dixie chicken, I'll be your Tennessee lamb?

I might know her. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 09, 2006, 03:13:57 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


That could be the route past Choose-A-Name to the VDS residence in Montanja.    Or one never knows, did they go toward Koen (past LaCabana per Charles Croes account), and then from there went toward Montanja.......



The big problem with CnCs to Arashi to Montanja scenario is the "I'm home" text message.  Doesn't make sense that Joran would be telling Deepak he ws home if Deepak had dropped him off at home.

That is also the big problem with the gardener's 2:30 pond sighting.  Deepak logged on at 2:00.  If Taco is correct that Joran's call to Deepak was at 2:26, then assuming computer records can't prove Deepak was actually on the computer from 2:26-2:55 (time it would have taken him to drive to the pond and back) if Deepak left almost immediately after 2:26 then driving quickly he could have reached the pond at around 2:40.  But then why was Joran messaging Deepak a little after 3:00 to tell him "I'm home" and asking "Whats' up"?  What is the scenario where 30 minutes after Deepak has rushed out for 2:40 pond meeting, Joran has somehow returned home without getting a ride from Deepak, and Deepak is also at home exchanging the sort of casual messages with Joran that don't make any sense, unless at that point at least one of them did not realize anything was wrong.

I don't see any way the gardener's story can be true without him being mistaken about Deepak being in the car: Either there were actually only two people in the car, Joran and the one in back he couldn't identify, or there were three and the one he identified as Deepak was actually someone else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:15:55 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Bad news guys.....O'Douls was adopted.  Someone else came before Mr. Whyte and got him.

 :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:  :evil:  :twisted:

Mr. Whyte is soooo sad!

ANIMAL SHELTERS SUCK!


Well, that is sad news!  Want me to send you some cats?  I seem to attract the damn things.


I KNEW I should have asked my 6 year old to say the prayer...he is in much better with God than I!!! haha really almost asked him!! Your kitty is coming!! I just KNOW it!!


Been praying since yesterday, I asked Mikey to pray for me, geesh!  I say there is a curse in this house where I can only keep one cat. Any other pet that comes into the house asides from KC ends up sick or dead.  I don't get it!  We've spent hundreds in vet bills, it's not like we don't care!

When I had all five kids in here I babysat four hermit crabs...those were the most spoiled crabs ever!  Did you know they love Cheerios?  :shock:   I gave my nice a zip lock with sea salt to sprinkle on their drinking water and they went over to the shell with water more than the damp sponge.

They are very easy to take care of pets...if a kid asks for a pet consider a hermit crab.  To me, way better than turtles!


Good with garlic/butter too!


You better protect those kneecaps of yours, buddy, I am an animal lover! lol


Me too!  That's why they all come to live with me.  I think they feel a vibe coming from me and maybe all the FOOD I put out! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 03:16:03 PM
Because I could not show you the cat I wanted to adopt here is a similar kitten for adoption at Petfinder:

(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c388/whytegirlpr/orangeandwhitekitten.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:18:24 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Well, I wasn't going to talk about that Ho Ho! But, since you brought it up.... She was kinda sweet and tasted like chocolate. I remember her well and it still makes my yoo yoo hoo hoo...


Did she sing "If you'll be my dixie chicken, I'll be your Tennessee lamb?

I might know her. :cry:


You Too?

I knew she had been around!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:26:56 PM
Can I say Joe Tacopina is a blood-sucking opportunist, or will that piss-off the RU site?

Man, I would love for that joke to come to Alabama and sue my old ass.  We would break news then.  Or, Joey would break wind and run like the shister he is!  Did I say “shister?”  

Look it up RU!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 03:27:39 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
You Too?

I knew she had been around!


We should write a freakin' song about it.  I don't know about you, but the whole sordid affair "scarred" me.


Of course, it could have been that pot of hot coffee she poured on me, right before she left. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 03:30:16 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Can I say Joe Tacopina is a blood-sucking opportunist, or will that piss-off the RU site?

Man, I would love for that joke to come to Alabama and sue my old ass.  We would break news then.  Or, Joey would break wind and run like the shister he is!  Did I say “shister?”  

Look it up RU!


Dude we are like ying-yang (continuing with the Chinese theme)...when you asked about Chinese torture I thought you were watching Myth Busters...they were testing turtures in one recent episode.

When I say that ying-yang thing is like when you feel down I am up, and backwards.  Dunno why.  Today you are funny and I am down.  Geez. :roll:   I will get off soon and start cooking and try and watch the Cup.  I am disappointed at the results fra-ita finals, wth...Hope Italy wins, I am boycotting France.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 03:31:54 PM
Off to watch the Cup...ttyl....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 03:33:30 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Can I say Joe Tacopina is a blood-sucking opportunist, or will that piss-off the RU site?

Man, I would love for that joke to come to Alabama and sue my old ass.  We would break news then.  Or, Joey would break wind and run like the shister he is!  Did I say “shister?”  

Look it up RU!

I think it is spelled SHYSTER. I am not sure what a SHYSTER is except I have always used it in the sense of a crooked lawyer. So, it does fit Joe Tacopina.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 03:37:43 PM
ok....I am back...filled in a little on my theory...sorry so long!!

 
Quote
ldstlou's Theory:

Leave C&C's around 1:00ish
Only one intention they had!! Find a victim to slip a date rape drug to and take advantage of. Happened at least 20 times before!! Drug is put in her shot/drink and the plan is in motion.

At some point one of the Kalpoes is dropped off at home..conclude this because of computer records...one of the boys was home...most likely Satish...did he have school the next day?

k2 have stuck to story of visiting the lighthouse...Deepak goes into pretty great detail as to drive in his statements...how fast/slow he was driving, Natalee falling asleep...asking what hotel she was staying at...etc....so she wants to visit lighthouse...drug starts kicking in...and she passes out. I think if more had happened here...would see some kind of hint in Deepak's statement. Does not appear to be a threat to tell this part of the story to Deepak!! Joran started out saying they visited there...I think his motive for changing shortly after was so he could shift blame to Deepak by saying he was dropped off at home and Deepak left w/ Natalee in the car.

Another thought...had to drive around somewhere until the drug kicked in!!

Head back from lighthouse. Is Satish already home at this point and the 3rd perp gardner could not identify has already been picked up or do they drop him off now and then pick up 3rd perp (Freddy?)

Natalee is now passed out cold. That was their intention!! To drug her and then rape her. So they find a spot close to her hotel in order to take advantage of her....thus the pond.

2:30ish at the pond area
1) gardner reliable witness and passed polygraph (Dave discusses gardner and possible scenario on pages 152 and 153 of his book)
2) it court records phone call was made by Joran about that time and the triangulation of call puts him in that area.

makes alot of sense to me too...if she passes out at lighthouse...they start to take her back to her hotel but stop there to take advantage of her. I am starting to think this is the scene of most of the crime!! This was in fact their original intention!! To slip her a date rape drug and then take advantage of her!! Seems to me this was the logical place for them to go. If I remember correctly, it is by the racquetball club and so they were familiar with the area, it was close to where she is staying..so they can dump her after...and the area is secluded...so don't have to worry about being caught!!

BUT!!! did not count on the gardner passing by...AND!! Natalee is slipping IN as well as out of consciousness!!

So Natalee has some level of consciousness...awakes to find herself being attack and starts to fight back and try to get away....or seeing the gardner throws the perps into a panic and Natalee has an opportunity to try and get away. She struggles to get out of the car...falls and hits her head.

Now their initial plan falls apart....have been seen by gardner, Natalee has injured her head... and they can't just dump her off at her hotel anymore!! So they go back to Joran's house to regroup. Deepak drops them off home and heads back to his own house. Joran, Natalee and 3rd perp (Freddy) are now at VDS property.

3:00ish they are back at Joran's

1) again court records according to David Koch shows another call from Joran's cell and now he is in vicinity of his own home. Call to Deepak's house...but if Deepak's phone is out of minutes...could have used Joran's to call his brother Satish who is home...tells Satish...I am on my way home...is Mom there yet? is she still awake? etc. Did not have Deepak's cell or home phone records in court so easily could have been Deepak using Joran's cell to call home landline phone.
2)Natalee gets in a call with the screeching monkey in the background.

So now they have taken advantage of her...she has hit her head trying to get out of car in the pond area...can't take her back to hotel...everyone would know what happened...they have been seen by gardner...so they head back to Joran's to regroup and figure out what to do next with the injured Natalee.

I really think at this point...because they are so casual about what they are doing..ie logging on computer etc...they intended to let her sleep it off while they figured a story to tell the next day and Natalee expired once they had put her to bed.
would explain the DNA evidence in Joran's room that Jossy was sure they found but then disappeared

They eventually have to get her back to her hotel!! But in a panic...don't want to do it right away because they were just seen by gardner and her head is bleeding. So they put her to bed in Joran's apartment with the intention of dropping her off right before her plane is do to depart so she can not alert anyone as to what had just happened. Could also explain where Joran comes up with Satish saying just leave her!! Probably actually said by Deepak as they are trying to figure out what to do with her at the pond...maybe one idea is to just dump her at the beach by fisherman's hut...but what if she doesn't wake up in time and misses her plane? Then they are in trouble because she would be able to tell authorities what they did to her...so they have to get her back to hotel....but time it so she makes it to her departing plane so she is off the island and they are out of trouble.

So they are now at Joran's apartment...Joran goes to main house...gets something to eat...logs on to computer...all his actions are calm...don't think he was alarmed yet. I don't think he suspects anything other than Natalee is sleeping it off and he is trying to come up with a plan so he can get her back to her hotel in time to catch the plane and not get accused of raping her. Natalee is in Joran's apartment and slips in her call...3rd person (Freddy?) catches her and is the voice in the background.  

Now what happens? Does (Freddy) panic and hurt her...or does she pass away from hitting her head earlier or date rape drug?

Joran logs off computer about  3:30ish...goes back to his apartment...and he finds Natalee has expired...either by 3rd perp (Freddy) or from her injury/drug

now another rush of activity!!!
4am...Paulus is out and about by McD's
Deepak frantically washing his car
is this when the 8 1/2 minute phone call happens?

I think this is my final theory...to me...makes sense...can explain so much of what was said by the 3 perps!!

comments?

I think we have gotten away from the pond area and evidence but I think it is the initial scene of the rape and possible fall/head injury.
What else do we know about the pond area? Wasn't it just recently said by Jossy or Art that half way through draining..it appeared they found evidence and police were scurrying!! Sorry...remember I painting until 3am..posted at 4am..haha not much sleep!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sue on July 09, 2006, 03:38:09 PM
LIke I say Joran is pond scum and Joe is what feeds on that scum


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 03:39:12 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Can I say Joe Tacopina is a blood-sucking opportunist, or will that piss-off the RU site?

Man, I would love for that joke to come to Alabama and sue my old ass.  We would break news then.  Or, Joey would break wind and run like the shister he is!  Did I say “shister?”  

Look it up RU!

I think it is spelled SHYSTER. I am not sure what a SHYSTER is except I have always used it in the sense of a crooked lawyer. So, it does fit Joe Tacopina.


Wikipedia:
Shyster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Contents [hide]
1 Description
2 Etymology
3 Common Misspellings
4 Other Uses
 


[edit]
Description
A shyster is someone who acts in a disreputable, unethical or unscrupulous way, especially in the practice of law and politics, or a con artist.

[edit]
Etymology
The origin is mostly likely from German Scheisser - "incompetent worthless person," literally "defecator".[1]
Other possible origins include a real 19th-century New York Jewish lawyer named Scheuster[citation needed], Shylock a character in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice.
One theory attributes the origin to the carnival game "Coconut Shy," given the reputation carnival workers and their games have[citation needed].

[edit]
Common Misspellings
Shyster is commonly misspelled. Common variants include schister, scheister, sheister, schyster, shister, shiester and schiester.

[edit]
Other Uses
It may also be applied as a derogatory term for a Hyster Fork Truck.
This term has been used in Isaac Asimov's short science-fiction robot story "Evidence". An atmosphere is created around a falsity and then proven wrong.
(military) SS-3 Shyster is the NATO reporting name for the R-5 theatre ballistic missile.
This is a disambiguation page: a list of articles associated with the same title. If an internal link referred you to this page, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shyster"
Categories: Articles with unsourced statements | Disambiguation
Fits a few more that I can think of too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 03:41:32 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


That could be the route past Choose-A-Name to the VDS residence in Montanja.    Or one never knows, did they go toward Koen (past LaCabana per Charles Croes account), and then from there went toward Montanja.......



The big problem with CnCs to Arashi to Montanja scenario is the "I'm home" text message.  Doesn't make sense that Joran would be telling Deepak he ws home if Deepak had dropped him off at home.

That is also the big problem with the gardener's 2:30 pond sighting.  Deepak logged on at 2:00.  If Taco is correct that Joran's call to Deepak was at 2:26, then assuming computer records can't prove Deepak was actually on the computer from 2:26-2:55 (time it would have taken him to drive to the pond and back) if Deepak left almost immediately after 2:26 then driving quickly he could have reached the pond at around 2:40.  But then why was Joran messaging Deepak a little after 3:00 to tell him "I'm home" and asking "Whats' up"?  What is the scenario where 30 minutes after Deepak has rushed out for 2:40 pond meeting, Joran has somehow returned home without getting a ride from Deepak, and Deepak is also at home exchanging the sort of casual messages with Joran that don't make any sense, unless at that point at least one of them did not realize anything was wrong.

I don't see any way the gardener's story can be true without him being mistaken about Deepak being in the car: Either there were actually only two people in the car, Joran and the one in back he couldn't identify, or there were three and the one he identified as Deepak was actually someone else.



Well, we know the time stamps were messed with, so I don't know if we have the accurate times.
What if the boys returned to Jorans and they were looking around for him and he texted them "I'm home" instead of yelling from the main house (where he was with Paulus)?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:43:37 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
You Too?

I knew she had been around!


We should write a freakin' song about it.  I don't know about you, but the whole sordid affair "scarred" me.


Of course, it could have been that pot of hot coffee she poured on me, right before she left. :lol:


Damn!  She just told me to stick a pot of coffee up my arse!  It was a little HOT, but I did what she asked...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 03:44:54 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:52 pm

Somebody saw the car of the brothers (the person is very familiar with the car, sees it almost daily, saw the brothers on the road at two am, going TO the direction of Montanja.


I'm going to call my cousin and let her know. She's a cop. And no, that's not the reason why I'm so gung-ho about defending the cops from corruption accusations. We're not that close


Klaas...sorry so ignorant...which way is this?


That could be the route past Choose-A-Name to the VDS residence in Montanja.    Or one never knows, did they go toward Koen (past LaCabana per Charles Croes account), and then from there went toward Montanja.......



The big problem with CnCs to Arashi to Montanja scenario is the "I'm home" text message.  Doesn't make sense that Joran would be telling Deepak he ws home if Deepak had dropped him off at home.

That is also the big problem with the gardener's 2:30 pond sighting.  Deepak logged on at 2:00.  If Taco is correct that Joran's call to Deepak was at 2:26, then assuming computer records can't prove Deepak was actually on the computer from 2:26-2:55 (time it would have taken him to drive to the pond and back) if Deepak left almost immediately after 2:26 then driving quickly he could have reached the pond at around 2:40.  But then why was Joran messaging Deepak a little after 3:00 to tell him "I'm home" and asking "Whats' up"?  What is the scenario where 30 minutes after Deepak has rushed out for 2:40 pond meeting, Joran has somehow returned home without getting a ride from Deepak, and Deepak is also at home exchanging the sort of casual messages with Joran that don't make any sense, unless at that point at least one of them did not realize anything was wrong.

I don't see any way the gardener's story can be true without him being mistaken about Deepak being in the car: Either there were actually only two people in the car, Joran and the one in back he couldn't identify, or there were three and the one he identified as Deepak was actually someone else.


what if Deepak is actually calling his brother? Look at the records again...no record that it was a cell to cell call!! Could have been Deepak borrowing Joran's phone because his was out of minutes and phoning his brother Satish who had been dropped off earler.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 03:48:47 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Damn! She just told me to stick a pot of coffee up my arse! It was a little HOT, but I did what she asked...




Regular or Decaf?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 03:53:22 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Damn! She just told me to stick a pot of coffee up my arse! It was a little HOT, but I did what she asked...




Regular or Decaf?


You guys are killin' me today. (http://bestsmileys.com/lol/24.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 03:53:30 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Can I say Joe Tacopina is a blood-sucking opportunist, or will that piss-off the RU site?

Man, I would love for that joke to come to Alabama and sue my old ass.  We would break news then.  Or, Joey would break wind and run like the shister he is!  Did I say “shister?”  

Look it up RU!


Dude we are like ying-yang (continuing with the Chinese theme)...when you asked about Chinese torture I thought you were watching Myth Busters...they were testing turtures in one recent episode.

When I say that ying-yang thing is like when you feel down I am up, and backwards.  Dunno why.  Today you are funny and I am down.  Geez. :roll:   I will get off soon and start cooking and try and watch the Cup.  I am disappointed at the results fra-ita finals, wth...Hope Italy wins, I am boycotting France.


Don’t be down!  There is something on the horizon and it might answer many of our questions.  Just stay tuned and the truth will spill across this website like pouring rain.  It is all there and the story will soon be told.

Hang tight my friend…


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 03:53:34 PM
well getting quiet in here...going to slip in a nap before I head back to paint AGAIN!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 03:53:46 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Ono"
Easy:

Sue You, Soo Yoo, and Sue You Yoo are cousins.


Weren't they backup singers for Hoo Hoo Boo Boo?


 8) Why, yes they were, as a matter of fact. Whatever became of that group?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 03:59:38 PM
Ono wrote:
Quote
Why, yes they were, as a matter of fact. Whatever became of that group?


They changed their name to "the occidental tourist". :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:00:40 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Sue You, Soo Yoo, and Sue You Yoo are cousins.


All members of the Who Sue Who Klan.  Very popular during the Kaching Dynasty.

There was an inner revolution because the two brothers "Me Sue You", and "I Sue You Too" were cheated out of their inheritance.

The rest is history. :lol:


 8) Ah so...yes, the Kaching Dynasty...closely aligned with the Cha Ching Dynasty...traces of their lineage still exist.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:02:26 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


Be glad you didn't close you eyes, sit down, and then it hopped. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 04:05:50 PM
I just baked a black raspberry pie and now I must go prime a desk.  I hope something will break soon.  I am getting super annoyed at the lack of action on that silly sandbar.  Are there any good cops in Aruba?  I haven't seen anything that suggusts there are.  I can't believe tourism is only down 17% - what is the attraction?   I am going now before I say something nasty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:06:44 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
 
BTW...any kids with Soo Yoo? :wink:


And if so, is the name Soo Mee?


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:10:09 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Sleuth wrote:
Quote
And if so, is the name Soo Mee?


If it was a boy he would be named    "Soo He".

And a girl would be named   "Noo Soo".

Of course if Sue had been from Iraq, she would have been named  Ali Mony.........but I digress. :lol:


Don't forget her brother Ali Baba 8) ...Second cousin twice removed to Baba WaWa


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:10:40 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


Be glad you didn't close you eyes, sit down, and then it hopped. :shock:



I wonder if the insurance company would have paid for an Emergency Room visit due to "frog up butt." :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:10:58 PM
Azaleas were in bloom and spring was within reach as a graduation trip was planned.  The radio played a song from yesterday.  The answer was yes, but with conditions.

“Dad, can I go with the group?”

“Please, let me go!”

Dreams turn into nightmares and a young life goes away with the whispers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:12:34 PM
Ono wrote:
Quote
Ah so...yes, the Kaching Dynasty...closely aligned with the Cha Ching Dynasty...traces of their lineage still exist


For many years here in the US, vases from the Cha Ching Dynasty were treasured and over the years their name was so often mispronounced that they became known as "change jars". :lol:

I'll bet "Soo Me" took Easywriter's when she left. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:14:43 PM
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
I wonder if the insurance company would have paid for an Emergency Room visit due to "frog up butt."


I wonder if you would be considered "amphibious". :shock:

Of course, your legs might be very popular. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:15:59 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
I wonder if the insurance company would have paid for an Emergency Room visit due to "frog up butt."


I wonder if you would be considered "amphibious". :shock:

Of course, your legs might be very popular. :lol:


And how do you know my legs are not already very popular? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:16:39 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Why, yes they were, as a matter of fact. Whatever became of that group?


They changed their name to "the occidental tourist". :lol:


 :lol: Broadcasting Sunday evenings for your listening pleasure live from the Orient Express..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:16:52 PM
Wow that story still going on?  Wish I had the inspiration but the game is getting good.

Zedane out.  For good!!!!!  Take that France!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:17:21 PM
Forgot to say thank you, Easywriter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:18:26 PM
Ono wrote:
Quote
Broadcasting Sunday evenings for your listening pleasure live from the Orient Express..


I'm becoming "disoriented". :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 04:19:27 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Ah so...yes, the Kaching Dynasty...closely aligned with the Cha Ching Dynasty...traces of their lineage still exist


For many years here in the US, vases from the Cha Ching Dynasty were treasured and over the years their name was so often mispronounced that they became known as "change jars". :lol:

I'll bet "Soo Me" took Easywriter's when she left. :cry:


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:19:31 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


Just sit down, close your eyes and expect the unexpected.   8)


Be glad you didn't close you eyes, sit down, and then it hopped. :shock:



I wonder if the insurance company would have paid for an Emergency Room visit due to "frog up butt." :shock:


 :shock: I think it's called Frogupp - Butt Syndrome...very rare.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:21:00 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Ah so...yes, the Kaching Dynasty...closely aligned with the Cha Ching Dynasty...traces of their lineage still exist


For many years here in the US, vases from the Cha Ching Dynasty were treasured and over the years their name was so often mispronounced that they became known as "change jars". :lol:

I'll bet "Soo Me" took Easywriter's when she left. :cry:


 :cry: No doubt she did.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:21:15 PM
Quote from: "Ono"

 :shock: I think it's called Frogupp - Butt Syndrome...very rare.


So rare that the excitement of it makes it hard to sit down!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:21:30 PM
BTgirl wrote:And how do you know my legs are not already very popular?
Quote


Send me a picture, Thirdstrike, Easywriter and I will critique your "gams" and post the results. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 04:22:18 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Broadcasting Sunday evenings for your listening pleasure live from the Orient Express..


I'm becoming "disoriented". :shock:


Houdini
I thought I had be hacked and my SM Link was redirected to a "Twilight Zone or Outer Limits" site for a bit when I first started reading a few pages back :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:22:34 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
I wonder if the insurance company would have paid for an Emergency Room visit due to "frog up butt."


I wonder if you would be considered "amphibious". :shock:

Of course, your legs might be very popular. :lol:


And how do you know my legs are not already very popular? :lol:


Let me take a closer look!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:22:43 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Broadcasting Sunday evenings for your listening pleasure live from the Orient Express..


I'm becoming "disoriented". :shock:


 8) I think we'd better stop while we think we're ahead. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:23:09 PM
I'd like to go to a casino right now and hear some ka-ching coming my way!

Best way to do this is on a Sunday morning...trust me!  That's when I usually made the most money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:23:11 PM
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
So rare that the excitement of it makes it hard to sit down!


Making you jumpy IS one of the symptoms. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 04:24:13 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Ah so...yes, the Kaching Dynasty...closely aligned with the Cha Ching Dynasty...traces of their lineage still exist


For many years here in the US, vases from the Cha Ching Dynasty were treasured and over the years their name was so often mispronounced that they became known as "change jars". :lol:

I'll bet "Soo Me" took Easywriter's when she left. :cry:


 :cry: No doubt she did.


Were you refering to Soo Me Wun or  Soo Me Tu??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:24:26 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Ono"

 :shock: I think it's called Frogupp - Butt Syndrome...very rare.


So rare that the excitement of it makes it hard to sit down!


........and dangerous  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:24:43 PM
OldFart wrote:
Quote
Houdini
I thought I had be hacked and my SM Link was redirected to a "Twilight Zone or Outer Limits" site for a bit when I first started reading a few pages back


Do not touch that dial OF.  You are not in control of your TV set. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 04:27:50 PM
For those that read my recap (per request of Jacquie  :wink: )  from last night of Dana and thought bits were jumbled, I think so too.  It was done as it was happening, not after the fact from the podcast,  and I see I left some blanks in some of it so I've cleaned that up.

BTW, it is a summary of the questions and answers and not a literal transcript of the podcast.

Useful for those that could not get the sound to work of the actual podcast
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=11500&sid=af52848d2d83da255c37ae31bd1bd007#11500


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:28:26 PM
Whoo, hoo, whoo ,whoooooo  Yoooooooo, Yoooooooooooooooo I am  talking to yooooooooooooooooo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:29:29 PM
Buckeye wrote:
Quote
Were you refering to Soo Me Wun or Soo Me Tu??


No his mistress "Wa U Do Wen Me Soo U"........ he always had her "Thaid" up so she couldn't take his "Change Jar. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:29:30 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Ono wrote:
Quote
Ah so...yes, the Kaching Dynasty...closely aligned with the Cha Ching Dynasty...traces of their lineage still exist


For many years here in the US, vases from the Cha Ching Dynasty were treasured and over the years their name was so often mispronounced that they became known as "change jars". :lol:

I'll bet "Soo Me" took Easywriter's when she left. :cry:


 :cry: No doubt she did.


Were you refering to Soo Me Wun or  Soo Me Tu??


Neither..I think her name was SO SOO MEE....neighbor of the above.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 04:29:42 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Ono"

 :shock: I think it's called Frogupp - Butt Syndrome...very rare.


So rare that the excitement of it makes it hard to sit down!


BT
I take it you found a frog in the commode?   :shock:

Medical Insurance for Frog removal question ... I cannot answer..
but mine paid for a pulled back.  
Lets just  say I sat down on the commode and one of the kids had put their  "Rubber Duck" in it.  
But then agian I did not give the real reason how I pulled it.
 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 04:30:39 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Whoo, hoo, whoo ,whoooooo  Yoooooooo, Yoooooooooooooooo I am  talking to yooooooooooooooooo


You called?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:32:14 PM
You!  You!  Give me fever!  When you hold me tight.  Fever when, when you kiss me...

Hmmmm, hmmm, hmmmm YOU give me fever!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 04:32:30 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Whoo, hoo, whoo ,whoooooo  Yoooooooo, Yoooooooooooooooo I am  talking to yooooooooooooooooo


Who  - Yoo, Woo Mee, Soo Yoo, Soo Mee Wun or Soo Mee Tu?  :wink:

With that, I am outta here for a while monkeys.  Have a great rest of the afternoon...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:32:41 PM
Oldfart wrote:
Quote
Medical Insurance for Frog removal question ... I cannot answer..
but mine paid for a pulled back.
Lets just say I sat down on the commode and one of the kids had put their "Rubber Duck" in it.
But then agian I did not give the real reason how I pulled it.


Okay Oldfart, that has to be the funniest post of the day.  You're lucky all you pulled was your back.  I would have broke my neck. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:33:54 PM
BeeBopaBlu!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 04:35:11 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
BT
I take it you found a frog in the commode?   :shock:

Medical Insurance for Frog removal question ... I cannot answer..
but mine paid for a pulled back.  
Lets just  say I sat down on the commode and one of the kids had put their  "Rubber Duck" in it.  
But then agian I did not give the real reason how I pulled it.
 :wink:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:35:44 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
You! You! Give me fever! When you hold me tight. Fever when, when you kiss me...


I'll bet when you missed your Change Jar, you sang:

It had to be Woo, It had to be Woo
She took my coin, now she has goin    <----- (poetic license) I'm a poet, I can rhyme stuff any way I want. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:37:00 PM
ITALY WINNING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 04:37:04 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Oldfart wrote:
Quote
Medical Insurance for Frog removal question ... I cannot answer..
but mine paid for a pulled back.
Lets just say I sat down on the commode and one of the kids had put their "Rubber Duck" in it.
But then agian I did not give the real reason how I pulled it.


Okay Oldfart, that has to be the funniest post of the day.  You're lucky all you pulled was your back.  I would have broke my neck. :lol:


If I had closed the bathroom door (this was like 3:am in the morning) I might have as I went thru the door way  :lol:

When You have young children( a long time ago) you discover that they leave the strangest things ANYWHERE :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:37:25 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:And how do you know my legs are not already very popular?
Quote


Send me a picture, Thirdstrike, Easywriter and I will critique your "gams" and post the results. :lol:


Here ya go! Oh wait - "gams" and "yams" are the same thing, right?

We blondes are so easily confused you know. 8)

(http://z.about.com/d/homecooking/1/0/j/9/swtpot2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 04:39:46 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:And how do you know my legs are not already very popular?
Quote


Send me a picture, Thirdstrike, Easywriter and I will critique your "gams" and post the results. :lol:


Here ya go! Oh wait - "gams" and "yams" are the same thing, right?

We blondes are so easily confused you know. 8)

(http://z.about.com/d/homecooking/1/0/j/9/swtpot2.gif)


BT
I can picture a sock Monkey with great looking Y/Gams, looking of a home,  showing up at your door any day now :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:39:48 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"

BT
I take it you found a frog in the commode?   :shock:

Medical Insurance for Frog removal question ... I cannot answer..
but mine paid for a pulled back.  
Lets just  say I sat down on the commode and one of the kids had put their  "Rubber Duck" in it.  
But then agian I did not give the real reason how I pulled it.
 :wink:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:41:17 PM
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Here ya go! Oh wait - "gams" and "yams" are the same thing, right?

We blondes are so easily confused you know.


 :shock: OMG, if dey is yo legs.......well I will definitely have to consult with TS, and Easywriter before I render an appraisal.

P.S.

Which end do da shoes go on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:41:46 PM
Stand back!

I'm going to sing.  I have a need.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:41:59 PM
ITALY WON THE WORLD CUP!!!!!!


TAKE DAT CHIRAC!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:43:26 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Stand back!

I'm going to sing. I have a need.


Belt it out Easy, music doth sooth the savage beast. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:43:47 PM
U-2 will be singing after the trophy hand-over....in case there are fans here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:45:35 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Here ya go! Oh wait - "gams" and "yams" are the same thing, right?

We blondes are so easily confused you know.


 :shock: OMG, if dey is yo legs.......well I will definitely have to consult with TS, and Easywriter before I render an appraisal.

P.S.

Which end do da shoes go on?


Shoes? :shock:

You're not talking about cooking? :shock:  :shock:

So does this mean gams and yams are NOT the same thing? :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:46:43 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Stand back!

I'm going to sing. I have a need.


Belt it out Easy, music doth sooth the savage beast. :lol:


Actually, it's savage breast. :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:48:30 PM
I think I will continue to watch TV.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:48:35 PM
Pretty woman, walking down the street
Pretty woman, the kind I like to meet
Pretty woman, I dont believe you
You're not the truth
No one could look as good as you
Mercy
Pretty woman, won't you pardon me
Pretty woman, I couldnt help by see
That you look lovely as can be
Are you lonely just like me?
Pretty woman, stop a while
Pretty woman, talk a while
Pretty woman, give your smile to me
Pretty woman, look my way
Pretty woman, say you'll stay with me
'Cause I need you, I'll treat you right
Come with me baby
Be mind tonight
Pretty woman, dont walk on by
Pretty woman, dont make me cry
Pretty woman, dont walk away hey
Okay, if that's the way it must be, okay
I guess I'll go on home, its late
There'll be tomorrow night, but wait!
What do I see?
Is she walking back to me?
Yeah, she's walking back to me!
Oh, pretty woman


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:50:02 PM
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Shoes?  

You're not talking about cooking?  

So does this mean gams and yams are NOT the same thing?



Oops My Bad...............forgot I was talking to a "southern blonde". :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 04:50:31 PM
Easy
What type of music do you need for the background ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 04:51:10 PM
Just as I said I was gonna continue to watch TV a player took off his pants and I saw his briefs..... :shock:

And Americans criticized the chicks for taking off the shirt and displaying a sports bra!!!!

Whassup with soccer anyways???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 04:51:56 PM
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Pretty woman...................................



You remembered it "word for word". :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 04:53:40 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Easywriter wrote:
Quote
Pretty woman...................................



You remembered it "word for word". :lol:


Yes, and it still scrunched my ass!  It felt good!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 04:56:31 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Shoes?  

You're not talking about cooking?  

So does this mean gams and yams are NOT the same thing?



Oops My Bad...............forgot I was talking to a "southern blonde". :lol:


 :wink:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 04:58:16 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Pretty woman, walking down the street
Pretty woman, the kind I like to meet
Pretty woman, I dont believe you
You're not the truth
No one could look as good as you
Mercy
Pretty woman, won't you pardon me
Pretty woman, I couldnt help by see
That you look lovely as can be
Are you lonely just like me?
Pretty woman, stop a while
Pretty woman, talk a while
Pretty woman, give your smile to me
Pretty woman, look my way
Pretty woman, say you'll stay with me
'Cause I need you, I'll treat you right
Come with me baby
Be mind tonight
Pretty woman, dont walk on by
Pretty woman, dont make me cry
Pretty woman, dont walk away hey
Okay, if that's the way it must be, okay
I guess I'll go on home, its late
There'll be tomorrow night, but wait!
What do I see?
Is she walking back to me?
Yeah, she's walking back to me!
Oh, pretty woman


Just to help ya remember    how it sounded ... Not the best but ....
http://ynucc.yeungnam.ac.kr/~bwlee/midi/pretty8.mid


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 05:02:43 PM
A big thanks to my monkey buddies.

You have kept me entertained this afternoon while I did laundry and baked bread.

Now I'm off to feed the doggies and cook dinner.

See ya later!

Smoochies everyone.(http://bestsmileys.com/kissing1/25.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 05:04:57 PM
See Ya BT. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 05:07:03 PM
BT  

Seeya....
look before ya sit  :lol: [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 09, 2006, 05:07:44 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"

Don’t be down!  There is something on the horizon and it might answer many of our questions.  Just stay tuned and the truth will spill across this website like pouring rain.  It is all there and the story will soon be told.

Hang tight my friend…


This sounds very promising. From your mouth to God's ears.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 05:09:36 PM
Easy
If ya like Roy... you may want to check this site for background posting Midi's   JMO of course
http://ynucc.yeungnam.ac.kr/~bwlee/roymidi.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 05:12:28 PM
Yesterday, a voice cried out and promised a call.  The telephone rang, but it was not the promise expected.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 05:28:16 PM
Easy
FWITW.. another artisit...  but kind the same music
http://members.fortunecity.com/rockstorm/NeilDiamond.html#
and I have always loved the music (not so much the words) in this one
http://members.fortunecity.com/rockstorm/mid/NeilDiamond/Solitary_Man.mid

See Ya Byeee Monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 05:32:55 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Ya don't think that Joran might be working for Aruba Today as a gopher for Ms Renfro and Mr Lacle.    I think he owes them big time!


Ha ha!  I picture the Goon's summer job as painting rocks,  for some reason.    :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 05:34:58 PM
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 05:41:57 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
You!  You!  Give me fever!  When you hold me tight.  Fever when, when you kiss me...

Hmmmm, hmmm, hmmmm YOU give me fever!


LOL! You need an aspirin. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 05:45:47 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Yesterday, a voice cried out and promised a call.  The telephone rang, but it was not the promise expected.


It was the bill collector... :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 05:47:07 PM
OK who can tell how bored I am.
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Italy.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 05:51:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


I did not want to feel this way but I was always dubious about her posts/motives. Couldn't shake that little red flag waving there in the background. Nothing sinister, just ever so not quite right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 05:52:36 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


I did not want to feel this way but I was always dubious about her posts/motives. Couldn't shake that little red flag waving there in the background. Nothing sinister, just ever so not quite right.

You are not alone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 05:53:56 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


I did not want to feel this way but I was always dubious about her posts/motives. Couldn't shake that little red flag waving there in the background. Nothing sinister, just ever so not quite right.

You are not alone.


Oh, I'm glad to know that..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on July 09, 2006, 05:54:26 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
ldstlou wrote:
what do you think guys...

I just keep going back to where the most 'evidence" (what little is left) points to...and I think I have to conclude the following...

2:30ish at the pond area
1) gardner reliable witness and passed polygraph
2) it court records phone call was made by Joran about that time and the triangulation of call puts him in that area.

makes alot of sense to me too...if she passes out at lighthouse...they start to take her back to her hotel but stop there to take advantage of her. I am starting to think this is the scene of most of the crime!!

She hits her head struggling to get out of the car as she is coming to.

3:00ish they are back at Joran's

1) again court records according to David Koch shows another call from Joran's cell and now he is in vicinity of his own home.
2)Natalee get's in a call with the screeching monkey in the background.

So now they have taken advantage of her...she has hit her head trying to get out of car in the pond area...can't take her back to hotel...everyone would know what happened...they have been seen by gardner...so they head back to Joran's to regroup and figure out what to do next with the injured Natalee.

I really think at this point...because they are so casual about what they are doing..ie logging on computer etc...they intended to let her sleep it off while they figured a story to tell the next day and Natalee expired once they had put her to bed.
would explain the DNA evidence in Joran's room that Jossy was sure they found but then dissappeared

just to continue a moment...Joran is on computer...still too casual...don't think he suspects anything other than Natalee is sleeping it off and they are trying to come up with a plan so they don't get accused of raping her. Logs off about 3:30ish...goes back to his apartment...tries to wake her up and get her back to her hotel...and maybe the plan was to take her back at this point and leave her abandoned on the beach!!...but he finds she has expired...now another rush of activity!!!
4am...Paulus is out and about by McD's
Deepak frantically washing his car
is this when the 8 1/2 minute phone call happens?

I think this is my final theory...to me...makes sense...can explain so much of what was said with this...going to work more detail in as time allows (when the painting is done!! haha)

comments?

I just think we all forgot about the pond area!! Very crucial I think!!
What else do we know about the pond area? Was't it just recently said by Jossy or Art that half way through draining..it appeared they found eveidence and police were scurrying!! Sorry...remember I paiting until 3am..posted at 4am..haha not much sleep!!


Very good theory IMO.  Let's just say these idiots are the selfish, narcistic bastards that they are, but truly not capable of murder.  It's very possible they did everything, but kill her on purpose.  An accident, but not willing to take the rap.  Of course with all those willing to help cover up, it's easy for the lies to continue.  In thier mind, they did nothing wrong if they didn't murder her.  The rest is ok behavior in Aruba....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 05:54:35 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
O/T

It just dawned on me how much impact an small occurrence can have on a person's life.

Up until last night, I had never found a frog sitting in my commode, so the chances of it happening again are slim to none.

And yet...I just know that for the rest of my life, everytime I walk into the bathroom I am going to look for a frog in the commode. :shock:  :lol:


It's a good thing you have a strong heart, BT.  First, scorpions in the bathtub, now frogs in the loo.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 09, 2006, 05:58:20 PM
BTgirl,

I can't find BettyCroaker, have you seen her???She was my favorite and her two little toads (Crunchy & Frogen Das) miss her badly..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 09, 2006, 05:58:49 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Yesterday, a voice cried out and promised a call.  The telephone rang, but it was not the promise expected.


You are beginning to sound like Shango. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 09, 2006, 05:59:08 PM
hmmm..... "frog in the commode" ........ sounds like an omen forebearing the France loss today in the World Cup.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on July 09, 2006, 06:00:07 PM
San, if your still here.  You have mail.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 06:00:36 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
BTgirl,

I can't find BettyCroaker, have you seen her???She was my favorite and her two little toads (Crunchy & Frogen Das) miss her badly..


Terry, Terry, Terry

When are you going to learn to leave your little friends at home when you come to visit my raccoons? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 06:01:06 PM
Today's menu:  Grilled pork by moi and tomato basil w/ grilled onion salad made by Mr. Whyte (a recipe he sampled at the groc. store).

Now I am eating chips and onion dip...men playing Halo 2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 06:01:29 PM
Ah and listening to Art wood pt. 1.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 06:02:56 PM
I like to read...any good websites out there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 09, 2006, 06:03:29 PM
Well I have to tell Sir Croaks alot that the raccoons have her, figures..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 06:04:24 PM
BTW our good friend at arubassilence said she is not leaving....boo hoo.... so her site will still be running.

Ousted Michelle's blog for accusing her of personal gain.  Gossip anyone?  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 06:05:39 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
I like to read...any good websites out there?


Um..well..if you l like sock monkeys, this one is great!

http://www.novogate.com/board/5148/153244-7.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 09, 2006, 06:06:42 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
San, if your still here.  You have mail.....


I got it and replied. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 06:07:21 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Well I have to tell Sir Croaks alot that the raccoons have her, figures..


I heard through the kudzu vine that they're hold her for ransom. Expect a note soon, but I think Science Diet figures in their demands. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 09, 2006, 06:08:05 PM
BTGirl if you see BettyCroaker, tell her that  Snoop Froggy Frog wants a date with her..Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 06:08:53 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
BTGirl if you see BettyCroaker, tell her that  Snoop Froggy Frog wants a date with her..Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 06:20:00 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
BTW our good friend at arubassilence said she is not leaving....boo hoo.... so her site will still be running.

Ousted Michelle's blog for accusing her of personal gain.  Gossip anyone?  :P


I'll bite...what's up with this, Whyte?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 06:21:18 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


I did not want to feel this way but I was always dubious about her posts/motives. Couldn't shake that little red flag waving there in the background. Nothing sinister, just ever so not quite right.

You are not alone.


Oh, I'm glad to know that..


Hi All!

How are you doing?  I've been away for a week.  Sorry to see that Aruba hasn't solved this case.

Which car rental do the Kalpoe's own?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 06:25:12 PM
hey everyone, whats going on?  I have been gone for over a week, anything new or just the same old crap?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on July 09, 2006, 06:28:49 PM
Quote from: "blah"
hey everyone, whats going on?  I have been gone for over a week, anything new or just the same old crap?


Hi Blah. Art Wood was on Dana's radio show twice. Transcripts are a great read.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: igsigs on July 09, 2006, 06:32:53 PM
And FYI Blah, both transcripts have their own thread :arrow:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 06:33:26 PM
Quote from: "blah"
hey everyone, whats going on?  I have been gone for over a week, anything new or just the same old crap?


Hey Blah - we saw you on TV at the Shuttle launch  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/shuttle070106a.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 06:49:12 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
And FYI Blah, both transcripts have their own thread :arrow:



thanks igsigs, i'll check that out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 06:50:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
hey everyone, whats going on?  I have been gone for over a week, anything new or just the same old crap?


Hey Blah - we saw you on TV at the Shuttle launch  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/shuttle070106a.jpg)



hahahaha funny you bring that up klaas, I'm just sitting here right now transferring my video of the launch to my computer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 06:51:35 PM
Blah - so was it cool there in person?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 06:52:42 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
ITALY WINNING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What people are they winning?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 06:55:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


Thank you, Klaas.  This is what a family member found out but no one believed it.  Family member was concerned about car rental being a front for something else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 06:56:31 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
ITALY WINNING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What people are they winning?


Tylergal - I know you are behind but it was the World Cup.  I'm with you by the way, could care less about it, LOLOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 06:57:29 PM
Italy won over France.  I boycott France and Chirac.

Arubassilence is going to continue and Kathy will not take the site down.  She said due to popular demand.

She had the guts to put a link to the people that talked bad about her and made accusations (Michelle's blog).  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 06:59:58 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Arubagirl on the front page on June 12, 2005:

Cancun, v/d Sloot, who everyone seems to be concentrating, is prob. upper middle class. I’m guessing his father earns about $70,000 max per year (taking the $1=afl. 1.80 exchange rate). I think it’s more in the $55.000 range. It’s a lot of money by Aruban standards, but I doubt that they’re millionares.

As for the Suriname brothers, don’t know. They own a car-rental, but I don’t know how profitable that business is. I’ve never heard of the Kalpoe family either before this.


Thank you, Klaas.  This is what a family member found out but no one believed it.  Family member was concerned about car rental being a front for something else.


Wasn't the same thing said about the Internet Cafe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 07:00:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
ITALY WINNING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What people are they winning?


Tylergal - I know you are behind but it was the World Cup.  I'm with you by the way, could care less about it, LOLOL  :lol:



I knew.  I was just joking because it was written as if Italy was winning people.  No punctuation makes things difficult to read.  You know that English major slips out occasionaly. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:01:17 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
ITALY WINNING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What people are they winning?


Tylergal - I know you are behind but it was the World Cup.  I'm with you by the way, could care less about it, LOLOL  :lol:



I knew.  I was just joking because it was written as if Italy was winning people.  No punctuation makes things difficult to read.  You know that English major slips out occasionaly. :wink:


NOTE TO SELF:  Do not write when excited.  Keep in mind that English is not your first language.  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 07:02:10 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
ITALY WINNING PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


What people are they winning?


Tylergal - I know you are behind but it was the World Cup.  I'm with you by the way, could care less about it, LOLOL  :lol:



I knew.  I was just joking because it was written as if Italy was winning people.  No punctuation makes things difficult to read.  You know that English major slips out occasionaly. :wink:


NOTE TO SELF:  Do not write when excited.  Keep in mind that English is not your first language.  :P


But it was funny the way you wrote it.  Otherwise, it would not have been funny at all.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:02:40 PM
CHICKS YOU GOTTA LOVE JOHNNY DEPP (About his love for his wife):

"I just knew, you know, it's over with," he told Oprah Winfrey of meeting French pop singer Vanessa Paradis in Paris in 1998. Since then the couple (in January) – who've never married – have been inseparable. "Our story is love and friendship united," she wrote in a tribute to Depp in French Elle. "I have the impression that no one could love the way we love."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on July 09, 2006, 07:03:05 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
BTW our good friend at arubassilence said she is not leaving....boo hoo.... so her site will still be running.

Ousted Michelle's blog for accusing her of personal gain.  Gossip anyone?  :P


I'll bite...what's up with this, Whyte?


Ya fill me in to..... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 07:06:34 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
CHICKS YOU GOTTA LOVE JOHNNY DEPP (About his love for his wife):

"I just knew, you know, it's over with," he told Oprah Winfrey of meeting French pop singer Vanessa Paradis in Paris in 1998. Since then the couple (in January) – who've never married – have been inseparable. "Our story is love and friendship united," she wrote in a tribute to Depp in French Elle. "I have the impression that no one could love the way we love."


Not his wife.  Mother of his children though, but they never wed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:06:36 PM
I will post this so nobody goes to the site:  This is the header:

I am here to state the facts of this case, so there for I will tell you all how most of these pictures came about.  I went to Aruba after 8 months of this case, I felt I knew enough to seek the questions that needed to be answered, at least some.  My main goal was to go to the dunes, and did find it very interesting.  Evidence? Yes, but none that I can talk about.  We will see what Aruba comes up with, lets just say, "a 7 yr old boy"?  You can do better then that.  My second goal was to meet some of the people involved.  Seeing as Joran was off to school, and Deepaks working papers had just been taken, I went around the corner and met Steve.  Did I find what happened to Natalee?  NO, but I was there to find facts, to help the family, and to ease my mind at some of the things I needed to do.  I do NOT claim glory for this, nor do I want any.  I am here to share my facts, and make the public aware of what is out there.  Call the shots yourself, these are some of the things I ran into.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on July 09, 2006, 07:09:32 PM
Quote
She had the guts to put a link to the people that talked bad about her and made accusations (Michelle's blog).


It's not guts my friend, its telling people if that is the garbage they want to believe, then be it.  Was she, or the person who wrote it in Aruba with me?  NO, they have no idea why I was there, or what I was doing there.  So there for I feel if someone is going to write about someone, unless you have facts, they need to just "not write".  That was a very unethical way to do things the way they did, the ones who even wrote comments on Kaths behalf were NOT even posted.  Sad that people like that are out there isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:09:44 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
CHICKS YOU GOTTA LOVE JOHNNY DEPP (About his love for his wife):

"I just knew, you know, it's over with," he told Oprah Winfrey of meeting French pop singer Vanessa Paradis in Paris in 1998. Since then the couple (in January) – who've never married – have been inseparable. "Our story is love and friendship united," she wrote in a tribute to Depp in French Elle. "I have the impression that no one could love the way we love."


Not his wife.  Mother of his children though, but they never wed.


yeah thanks for that correction Jacqueline.  Geesh I can't help it but missing those little details...

Life partners.  Buddies.  Husband and wife.  Two souls united with one common goal.  Whatever.  I consider my own marriage the same thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 07:11:58 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
CHICKS YOU GOTTA LOVE JOHNNY DEPP (About his love for his wife):

"I just knew, you know, it's over with," he told Oprah Winfrey of meeting French pop singer Vanessa Paradis in Paris in 1998. Since then the couple (in January) – who've never married – have been inseparable. "Our story is love and friendship united," she wrote in a tribute to Depp in French Elle. "I have the impression that no one could love the way we love."


Not his wife.  Mother of his children though, but they never wed.


yeah thanks for that correction Jacqueline.  Geesh I can't help it but missing those little details...

Life partners.  Buddies.  Husband and wife.  Two souls united with one common goal.  Whatever.  I consider my own marriage the same thing.


Oh yes, no judgement call intended.

They have a beautiful solid union and it sounds beautiful.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 07:21:02 PM
Well, I am interested in what everyone has to say about this case.  I know there are some who know more than others but it might be that someone who only knows one piece of the puzzle and not the whole thing who connects the missing dots, Refugees and their ilk excepted when I mentioned interested in everyone's opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on July 09, 2006, 07:21:24 PM
OK, what is this?  Everytime I write something everyone disappears?  Hey,........Hello.......Lets finish this


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 07:29:06 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
I will post this so nobody goes to the site:  This is the header:


Whyte, why are you opposed to that website?  It supports the H/T families.  She has put a lot of time, emotions and money into searching for answers, IMO  If you have any "dirt" on her, then please dish instead of make innuendos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:30:58 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote
She had the guts to put a link to the people that talked bad about her and made accusations (Michelle's blog).


It's not guts my friend, its telling people if that is the garbage they want to believe, then be it.  Was she, or the person who wrote it in Aruba with me?  NO, they have no idea why I was there, or what I was doing there.  So there for I feel if someone is going to write about someone, unless you have facts, they need to just "not write".  That was a very unethical way to do things the way they did, the ones who even wrote comments on Kaths behalf were NOT even posted.  Sad that people like that are out there isn't it?


I am no one to tell anybody what to believe...this case has caused so many tree-like branches of assumptions, basis, theories, conspiracies and such that that is the main reason why it is so fascinating, yet so tragic at the same time.  

On the matter of refusing to post pro- or con- comments on a blog, like Red says all the time it is their blog so they can ban or allow comments or something in that line.  I don't have a blog so it is hard for me to understand that line of thought.  To me I would allow each and every comment as long as there is no gross insult wording, or something that would get ME in trouble.

It surprised me the article when I read it at Michelle's but I have heard the same thing about arubassilence for a long time too.  Ethical?  Red and Tom have NEVER directed a link to other blogs that have finger-pointed at them.  If they did that they would have to work it out with their server!!  

I have found like-minded people with one common goal, some seem to share the common goal but they have their own...Many people I like and people that I liked that have moved on or have crossed over.  I have been disappointed many times over.  And of course some I dislike.

One thing I am learning with this whole situation is to not trust anyone completely in this board.  I enjoy it immensely when we organize the prayer circle and try and nitpick our brains.  But I am not gonna allow myself to get into any negative scenario or to be put down in any way.  Nor any of you.  

I'd rather pray for Natalee and follow up her case through regular media paths than to get caught in a blog war!  Do I need that?  Absolutely not!  I dunno but I would ask myself what would Natalee like me to do.  Fingerpointing is not gonna help find her any sooner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 07:31:37 PM
I think the attack on Kath at arubassilence was a low blow, unjustified and not worthy of discussion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:33:00 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, I am interested in what everyone has to say about this case.  I know there are some who know more than others but it might be that someone who only knows one piece of the puzzle and not the whole thing who connects the missing dots, Refugees and their ilk excepted when I mentioned interested in everyone's opinion.


Coincidence, I am listening to the satellite radio and they are mentioning the same phrase, "the one person who has the information"....  I wish the communication was clearer.  With all the stuff going on in the house is hard to listen to...I might listen to it again later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 07:33:22 PM
Hi,

I just went to www.arubasilence.com  and got a travel site.  Anyone have the correct address?

Thank you!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:34:08 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
I will post this so nobody goes to the site:  This is the header:


Whyte, why are you opposed to that website?  It supports the H/T families.  She has put a lot of time, emotions and money into searching for answers, IMO  If you have any "dirt" on her, then please dish instead of make innuendos.


Please read my comment above.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:34:49 PM
Quote from: "MissinNat"
Hi,

I just went to www.arubasilence.com  and got a travel site.  Anyone have the correct address?

Thank you!!!!

http://www.arubassilence.com.  It needs another "s".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 09, 2006, 07:35:16 PM
Quote from: "MissinNat"
Hi,

I just went to www.arubasilence.com  and got a travel site.  Anyone have the correct address?

Thank you!!!!


Two s's. arubassilence, I believe. (Haven't tried it.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 07:35:51 PM
~ Mama said there will days like this ~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 07:36:05 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
~ Mama said there will days like this ~


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on July 09, 2006, 07:36:30 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I think the attack on Kath at arubassilence was a low blow, unjustified and not worthy of discussion.

Absolutely!  We wont go where it "originated from". Sad


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 07:37:22 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Quote from: "MissinNat"
Hi,

I just went to www.arubasilence.com  and got a travel site.  Anyone have the correct address?

Thank you!!!!

http://www.arubassilence.com.  It needs another "s".


Thanks, Whhytegirl!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:38:32 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I think the attack on Kath at arubassilence was a low blow, unjustified and not worthy of discussion.


Leslie,

What I don't get it's how it started (???).  Was there trouble between these two blogs BEFORE?

I will not continue but the last thing I was told to was to not trust everything I see.  I visited the site very frequently too.  

I wonder what Natalee's family has been up to.  Any book signings, meetings, or interviews?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 07:39:16 PM
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
Quote from: "MissinNat"
Hi,

I just went to www.arubasilence.com  and got a travel site.  Anyone have the correct address?

Thank you!!!!


Two s's. arubassilence, I believe. (Haven't tried it.)


You are right, Port.  Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:40:02 PM
Mama said the same thing too and you know I am not in the best mood today.  Which makes it worse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 07:41:00 PM
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 07:42:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Blah - so was it cool there in person?


it was incredible.  All of the video and pictures just cannot do justice, it is something that I am very glad I was able to experience in person.  It was a good day for this country, as Ted Nugent would say - "you cant do that in France"

(we saw mickey mouse, the shuttle launch, and ted nugent blow the roof off the house of blues all on the same vacation.  What a trip)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 07:43:47 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


I do think it will be solved and justice will be served.  I don't think they will ever find Natalee's body though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 07:44:10 PM
I know!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 07:45:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


I do think it will be solved and justice will be served.  I don't think they will ever find Natalee's body though.


I so hope so Klaas.

Something's gotta give.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Hotshot on July 09, 2006, 07:45:29 PM
Quote
What I don't get it's how it started (???). Was there trouble between these two blogs BEFORE?


HOW?  We all would like to know that.  No there wasn't trouble.  Now I am going before the BP rises.  You might want to ask them how they can turn on their own.  No, Nat would NOT want this.  And yes, the family does know of my site.  Now, unlike some blogs, lets put our aggressions out on finding her, and doing good things to make people happy, and not upset.     Going to take a nap.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 07:47:48 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Blah - so was it cool there in person?


it was incredible.  All of the video and pictures just cannot do justice, it is something that I am very glad I was able to experience in person.  It was a good day for this country, as Ted Nugent would say - "you cant do that in France"

(we saw mickey mouse, the shuttle launch, and ted nugent blow the roof off the house of blues all on the same vacation.  What a trip)


Wow!  I've seen all three but not that close together in time.  Saw Ted Nugent and the Amboy Dukes back in 1970 or 71.  I will never forget that show.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on July 09, 2006, 07:48:39 PM
Hi, monkeys! Gosh, I feel as though I've been away forever! It's only been yesterday and most of today! Preparing to move, I believe, is the worst of the experience in re-locating.

I awoke early yesterday and traveled to the "new" place. Culligan was due in between 9 am and 1 pm. In the meantime, I started washing walls to prep for painting. Had no ladder. I climbed onto the kitchen counter to stand on the sink (brilliant idea!  :roll: ). Once finished cleaning there, I went to climb down, lost my footing and fell backward. While flailing like a bug on its back as I fell, I scratched the snot out of my inner arm. It looks really attractive.   :?  Nothing broke, and luckily no one was around to witness my humiliation. I had been trying to get the hose screwed onto the outside spigot to clean blinds when Culligan finally came. Took him hours to install the water softener. Met the neighbor, who loaned me his ladder. In the meantime, the water was shut off. Anyhoo, the spigot was so lime encrusted that I had to soak it in lime remover (catching on to the need for the water conditioner?), which also took forever. Finally got it clean enough to screw the hose on to it. But no water. So I sprayed the blinds with orange cleaner and wiped them down with.... toilet paper. When the water was finally back on, I rinsed and washed them again (would have been easier to simply buy new ones). By this time, I was purdy darn smelly. I had brought towels, change of clothes, shampoo, deoderant, etc. Go to to tub and try to turn on the water. A trickle of rust colored sludge comes out.   :shock:  Talk about gross. Never could get a stream of water going. Brought out the lime/rust/everything remover, turned the faucet upside down and got enough rust off the inside that a small trickle of water started. Completely insufficient for bathing of any sort. I tried to unscrew the faucet from the plumbing. Only got so far before it would go no further. Definitely gonna need some new plumbing in that tub. Yechk! Decided to wash down the garage floor, which was quite a chore. Went to my niece's to shower and noticed she had lots of laundry (she had been at her aunt's on the other side of her family, dog sitting). Started washing their clothes. She came home with her 7 year old, her 4 year old twins, and a friend of the 7 year old's. Ended up doing the entire laundry, watching the children while she napped, and then when she went to the store. We were all on her bed, watching the Spongebob movie. I was into it. Finally showered and zonked out. Got up this morning, went to the "new" place, gave the neighbor back his ladder, and went to the office to do paperwork. Could not log on. It would not accept my password.  :? A guy, who was supposed to be on vacation until tomorrow, came in to get meds to deliver. The one scheduled had called in. I took half the meds to deliver. Went to my mother's and had dinner. we both napped. Justin's dad called, which woke us both (which was good, as we slept over 3 hours). Took Mother to the drugstore. Dropped her back home. Went to office again (I had changed my password on Friday and forgotten that I had  :roll: ). Worked for an hour, then left to pick up Justin. Stanleysteemer is coming tomorrow. The "new" landlord (who is an old friend, both literally and figuratively) has amessage on his phone about the tub faucet.... I'm sure he will be thrilled.

And now I am here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 07:49:18 PM
BLAH~

Speaking of France..........


BIG CONGRATS TO ITALY!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 07:49:35 PM
Tears traced down the cheeks of memories lost with the waves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:51:08 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

It would really sadden me to not see it solved throughly.  I used to believe that it would be but not now.

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


I believe more know, more are into this mess but no one is talking.  Which is bugging me BIG TIME.  What could be so significant to cause such a ruckus on this island yet nobody does anything?  Why let "democracy" slip through like sand on an open palm of a hand to shut up so many people?  Care about Aruba but not care about the consequences this is carrying (and will continue) for years to come?

Unless the Department of State or any other investigative agencies step up to the plate, I don't see that happening.  The fact that the NY judge is taking so long has me very confused.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 07:51:51 PM
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 07:52:26 PM
Dom dididy doo dom diddiy doo!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 07:53:42 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dom dididy doo dom diddiy doo!


She looked good, she looked fine , and i nearly lost my mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 07:56:35 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dom dididy doo dom diddiy doo!


Easy,

Please share some of whatever you're taking?

I think your drugs are better than mine. :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 09, 2006, 07:56:54 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


Good question. In my heart, I think we will eventually find out what happened when somebody involved gives a credible report. I'm afraid that justice -- that is, punishment -- will not be meted out because no one in the Aruban society seems to be dedicated to nailing the correct perps.

If we had to define goals, I would settle for getting the true story and getting Natalee's body properly buried at home. I would leave punishment to the gods (or the Aruban underworld). Life is long and the people who made her disappear are likely to have plenty of trouble for a long time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 07:58:07 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dom dididy doo dom diddiy doo!


Easy,

Please share some of whatever you're taking?

I think your drugs are better than mine. :lol:  :lol:


Mine too....second the motion!  My anti-whatever is taken at nighttime! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 07:58:11 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dom dididy doo dom diddiy doo!


She looked good, she looked fine , and i nearly lost my mind.


I LIKE it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 07:58:36 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


I believe this case was solved long ago.  The three suspects raped and killed Natalee, and papa sloot helped get rid of the evidence.  

Its just a matter of finding someone in Aruba to do anything about it.  I do not think that will ever happen unless for some reason the FBI were to get involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 08:00:20 PM
Supposedly the FBI is; but you know that stuff they do is never disclosed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 08:00:59 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
BLAH~

Speaking of France..........


BIG CONGRATS TO ITALY!!!!!!!!!!! :lol:



Heh Heh !! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on July 09, 2006, 08:01:13 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote
She had the guts to put a link to the people that talked bad about her and made accusations (Michelle's blog).


It's not guts my friend, its telling people if that is the garbage they want to believe, then be it.  Was she, or the person who wrote it in Aruba with me?  NO, they have no idea why I was there, or what I was doing there.  So there for I feel if someone is going to write about someone, unless you have facts, they need to just "not write".  That was a very unethical way to do things the way they did, the ones who even wrote comments on Kaths behalf were NOT even posted.  Sad that people like that are out there isn't it?


I posted a positive for you and it was never listed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 08:02:50 PM
Wow Justinsmama...you have REALLY been busy this weekend!! Bless your heart (for real!) Great to see you! I know you've been busy lately and I admire your diligence in staying off the forum in favor of spending time with Justin  :lol:

BTW, can anyone tell me how someone saying "bless your heart" turned in to a bad thing? I have always used it as a term of sympathy, endearment, and commiseration...would somebody be so kind as to fill me in? I've been wondering this for MONTHS!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 08:03:08 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...


who is kath,and was she able to interview Croes?

I dont know the rest, can you help me out here?????? :shock:


Title: HEY! HEY!
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 08:03:10 PM
:P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 08:03:30 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dom dididy doo dom diddiy doo!


She looked good, she looked fine , and i nearly lost my mind.


I LIKE it!


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 08:04:38 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Supposedly the FBI is; but you know that stuff they do is never disclosed.


Didn't someone say that even if the FBI were to get involved that they still wouldn't be able to interview the usual suspects? I wonder if this is really true...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 09, 2006, 08:05:13 PM
Easy here is one for you.

A little ole' man was sittin' on a step
And a tear trickled own his cheek.
I said "What's the matter?"
He said "A train just ran over me."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:06:05 PM
Easy:
http://tinyurl.com/eb88g
All the old songs are on You Tube!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 08:06:28 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
Supposedly the FBI is; but you know that stuff they do is never disclosed.


Didn't someone say that even if the FBI were to get involved that they still wouldn't be able to interview the usual suspects? I wonder if this is really true...


Easy, I pass the ball to you...answer that one please.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 08:07:22 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Wow Justinsmama...you have REALLY been busy this weekend!! Bless your heart (for real!) Great to see you! I know you've been busy lately and I admire your diligence in staying off the forum in favor of spending time with Justin  :lol:

BTW, can anyone tell me how someone saying "bless your heart" turned in to a bad thing? I have always used it as a term of sympathy, endearment, and commiseration...would somebody be so kind as to fill me in? I've been wondering this for MONTHS!!


Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely.  So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 08:07:27 PM
Two little monkeys swinging in a tree
teasing Mr. Alligator
"you can't catch me!"

Along came Mr. Alligator
long as can be
and he SNATCHED one
monkey out of that tree

Oh no! Where he go?

--Brought to you courtesy of my 3-year-old daughter  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 08:08:07 PM
so, i take it there is still no word out of New York then eh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 08:08:53 PM
Bet your nuts no.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 08:09:18 PM
Quote from: "blah"
so, i take it there is still no word out of New York then eh?


Nope. :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: whytegirl on July 09, 2006, 08:09:54 PM
Good for Art Wood to state that he was not paid in any way whatsoever in this case; volunteered like Texas Equusearch.

Gotta go Jen wants food.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 08:09:57 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mishy"
Wow Justinsmama...you have REALLY been busy this weekend!! Bless your heart (for real!) Great to see you! I know you've been busy lately and I admire your diligence in staying off the forum in favor of spending time with Justin  :lol:

BTW, can anyone tell me how someone saying "bless your heart" turned in to a bad thing? I have always used it as a term of sympathy, endearment, and commiseration...would somebody be so kind as to fill me in? I've been wondering this for MONTHS!!


Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely.  So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


Thanks Jacqueline....Finally!! But I can't really imagine anything that begins with "bless your..." being any kind of a slam....

Unless someone told me "bless your fat a$$" or something personal like that  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 09, 2006, 08:10:43 PM
.
As this forum belongs to Red and Tom, any poster that they have allowed to post here is deserving of at least being treated in a civil manner.  Launching personal attacks and questioning the motives and loyalties of others seems to be happening more often of late.  I know there is not much new to discuss but I don't think we should be referring to other posters as though they are not going to read it and blasting them especially when they are being supportive of the family in this tragedy.

Some try to pretend there is a rift between BFN and this site when none exists and trying to eliminate one of the other few remaining pro-Natalee sites is just not the direction in which I personally want to go.  We need all the sites for Natalee as there are so few remaining now.  I don't understand why attacking any one of them is helpful.  Take them down one by one until none are left?  I'd hate to see that happen.  JMO.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:11:21 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...

who is kath,and was she able to interview Croes?
I dont know the rest, can you help me out here?????? :shock:

Yes, she talked to him and a picture of the two of them was posted on a website with the title "I smell a rat" and went on to run down Kath and make some very strange and slanderous allegations.  It was quite nasty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 08:11:45 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mishy"
Wow Justinsmama...you have REALLY been busy this weekend!! Bless your heart (for real!) Great to see you! I know you've been busy lately and I admire your diligence in staying off the forum in favor of spending time with Justin  :lol:

BTW, can anyone tell me how someone saying "bless your heart" turned in to a bad thing? I have always used it as a term of sympathy, endearment, and commiseration...would somebody be so kind as to fill me in? I've been wondering this for MONTHS!!


Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely.  So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


Thanks Jacqueline....Finally!! But I can't really imagine anything that begins with "bless your..." being any kind of a slam....

Unless someone told me "bless your fat a$$" or something personal like that  :shock:


Well I think it was being used in a sarcastic way.

Any who.....

Not important, and i may even have the story a little wrong, but I think that was the jist of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 08:14:10 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...

who is kath,and was she able to interview Croes?
I dont know the rest, can you help me out here?????? :shock:

Yes, she talked to him and a picture of the two of them was posted on a website with the title "I smell a rat" and went on to run down Kath and make some very strange and slanderous allegations.  It was quite nasty.


is there some transcript of the conversation with croes or anything??

did she get anything out of him?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:15:01 PM
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Easy,

Please share some of whatever you're taking?

I think your drugs are better than mine.


Never buy Generic BT.  Go the extra bucks and buy the genuine stuff.

You know, come to think of it.....taking generic drugs may be what made your legs look like sweet potatoes. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 08:15:48 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Easy,

Please share some of whatever you're taking?

I think your drugs are better than mine.


Never buy Generic BT.  Go the extra bucks and buy the genuine stuff.

You know, come to think of it.....taking generic drugs may be what made your legs look like sweet potatoes. :lol:


Durn, Houdini!

I'll bet you're right! :shock:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:19:28 PM
Mishy wrote:
Quote
BTW, can anyone tell me how someone saying "bless your heart" turned in to a bad thing? I have always used it as a term of sympathy, endearment, and commiseration...would somebody be so kind as to fill me in? I've been wondering this for MONTHS!!


It's ambiguous enough to be used both as a compliment and a "backhanded" insult.  Depends on your inflection.

Another one is "Nice".  Somebody pays you money they owe you.....Nice!


Somebody backs into your car on the parking lot...........Oh Nice! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 08:21:03 PM
Easy

You've got mail. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:21:09 PM
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Durn, Houdini!

I'll bet you're right!



Damned fine sweet potatoes, I might add............but still sweet potatoes. :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 08:21:17 PM
It's been over 13 months since Natalee Holloway went missing in Aruba.  Many of us have been following the case since the very beginning.  Few of us expected the hatred and outright lies spewed by some posters.  SCARED MONKEYS WANT'S JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.  We stand behind the Holloway/Twitty families.  WE WILL NOT GIVE UP.  Now is not the time for family friendly sites to bicker amongst themselves.  Discussing it is a distraction from the case and serves no purpose, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:22:00 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...

who is kath,and was she able to interview Croes?
I dont know the rest, can you help me out here?????? :shock:

Yes, she talked to him and a picture of the two of them was posted on a website with the title "I smell a rat" and went on to run down Kath and make some very strange and slanderous allegations.  It was quite nasty.

is there some transcript of the conversation with croes or anything??
did she get anything out of him?

{{Sorry Leslie, but you probably didn't see what I just posted - let's not bring the battle to SM please}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 08:22:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
It's been over 13 months since Natalee Holloway went missing in Aruba.  Many of us have been following the case since the very beginning.  Few of us expected the hatred and outright lies spewed by some posters.  SCARED MONKEYS WANT'S JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.  We stand behind the Holloway/Twitty families.  WE WILL NOT GIVE UP.  Now is not the time for family friendly sites to bicker amongst themselves.  Discussing it is a distraction from the case and serves no purpose, IMO.


YEAH !

 :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 08:23:14 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Durn, Houdini!

I'll bet you're right!



Damned fine sweet potatoes, I might add............but still sweet potatoes. :lol:  :lol:


Actually, on those few occasions when I wear a dress, people always tell me what nice legs I have.

I think they're just surprised to find I have legs, though, since they so rarely see them. :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 08:24:55 PM
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/EasyOne.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:27:03 PM
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely. So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


I could be wrong, and if I am, I relish any one of the southern belles on this board to correct me.  I thought this was an accepted and popular way for a southern lady to diss someone.  "Well bless her heart".  But it was also used as a compliment.

Any y'all ladies care to correct this "on the mason/dixon line yankee? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 09, 2006, 08:27:16 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/EasyOne.gif)


Did you read that e-mail I sent you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 09, 2006, 08:27:50 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...

who is kath,and was she able to interview Croes?
I dont know the rest, can you help me out here?????? :shock:

Yes, she talked to him and a picture of the two of them was posted on a website with the title "I smell a rat" and went on to run down Kath and make some very strange and slanderous allegations.  It was quite nasty.

is there some transcript of the conversation with croes or anything??
did she get anything out of him?

{{Sorry Leslie, but you probably didn't see what I just posted - let's not bring the battle to SM please}}



errr i'm sorry, my question was "did the person who talked to Croes get any information out of him, or is there a transcript of this conversation" (meaning the conversation between Croes and this Kath)

I dont care if someone is mad about a picture or a hug or whatever, i just want to know if this person got any info from Croes.

thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 08:28:55 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely. So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


I could be wrong, and if I am, I relish any one of the southern belles on this board to correct me.  I thought this was an accepted and popular way for a southern lady to diss someone.  "Well bless her heart".  But it was also used as a compliment.

Any y'all ladies care to correct this "on the mason/dixon line yankee? :lol:


Enlighten this jersey tomato too! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:33:12 PM
Blah:  If she did get some info out of Steve Croes she would have passed it on to the family.  I don't know if she did and I don't ask those questions.
  8)    Do Wah Diddy Diddy Dum Diddy Do :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Whytegirl:    Kath was in Aruba and found Steve Croes who is "as dumb as rocks" according to SandraK and attempted to get some info from him.  There was a picture taken. You know the rest...

who is kath,and was she able to interview Croes?
I dont know the rest, can you help me out here?????? :shock:

Yes, she talked to him and a picture of the two of them was posted on a website with the title "I smell a rat" and went on to run down Kath and make some very strange and slanderous allegations.  It was quite nasty.


don't think it was the greatest way to go about things but don't you see how that picture could really bother her? It gave me the creeps.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 08:35:01 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/EasyOne.gif)


Did you read that e-mail I sent you?


I'M WALKIN' TO NU ORLEANS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 08:36:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
It's been over 13 months since Natalee Holloway went missing in Aruba.  Many of us have been following the case since the very beginning.  Few of us expected the hatred and outright lies spewed by some posters.  SCARED MONKEYS WANT'S JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.  We stand behind the Holloway/Twitty families.  WE WILL NOT GIVE UP.  Now is not the time for family friendly sites to bicker amongst themselves.  Discussing it is a distraction from the case and serves no purpose, IMO.


you are right Klaas...thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 09, 2006, 08:38:35 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
[I'M WALKIN' TO NU ORLEANS!


Well, There is a House in Nu Orleens,
They call it the Rising Sun!
It's been the ruin of many a poor boy,
And God I know I'm one.

Better be careful there, Easy~ :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 08:39:25 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Hi, monkeys! Gosh, I feel as though I've been away forever! It's only been yesterday and most of today! Preparing to move, I believe, is the worst of the experience in re-locating.

I awoke early yesterday and traveled to the "new" place. Culligan was due in between 9 am and 1 pm. In the meantime, I started washing walls to prep for painting. Had no ladder. I climbed onto the kitchen counter to stand on the sink (brilliant idea!  :roll: ). Once finished cleaning there, I went to climb down, lost my footing and fell backward. While flailing like a bug on its back as I fell, I scratched the snot out of my inner arm. It looks really attractive.   :?  Nothing broke, and luckily no one was around to witness my humiliation. I had been trying to get the hose screwed onto the outside spigot to clean blinds when Culligan finally came. Took him hours to install the water softener. Met the neighbor, who loaned me his ladder. In the meantime, the water was shut off. Anyhoo, the spigot was so lime encrusted that I had to soak it in lime remover (catching on to the need for the water conditioner?), which also took forever. Finally got it clean enough to screw the hose on to it. But no water. So I sprayed the blinds with orange cleaner and wiped them down with.... toilet paper. When the water was finally back on, I rinsed and washed them again (would have been easier to simply buy new ones). By this time, I was purdy darn smelly. I had brought towels, change of clothes, shampoo, deoderant, etc. Go to to tub and try to turn on the water. A trickle of rust colored sludge comes out.   :shock:  Talk about gross. Never could get a stream of water going. Brought out the lime/rust/everything remover, turned the faucet upside down and got enough rust off the inside that a small trickle of water started. Completely insufficient for bathing of any sort. I tried to unscrew the faucet from the plumbing. Only got so far before it would go no further. Definitely gonna need some new plumbing in that tub. Yechk! Decided to wash down the garage floor, which was quite a chore. Went to my niece's to shower and noticed she had lots of laundry (she had been at her aunt's on the other side of her family, dog sitting). Started washing their clothes. She came home with her 7 year old, her 4 year old twins, and a friend of the 7 year old's. Ended up doing the entire laundry, watching the children while she napped, and then when she went to the store. We were all on her bed, watching the Spongebob movie. I was into it. Finally showered and zonked out. Got up this morning, went to the "new" place, gave the neighbor back his ladder, and went to the office to do paperwork. Could not log on. It would not accept my password.  :? A guy, who was supposed to be on vacation until tomorrow, came in to get meds to deliver. The one scheduled had called in. I took half the meds to deliver. Went to my mother's and had dinner. we both napped. Justin's dad called, which woke us both (which was good, as we slept over 3 hours). Took Mother to the drugstore. Dropped her back home. Went to office again (I had changed my password on Friday and forgotten that I had  :roll: ). Worked for an hour, then left to pick up Justin. Stanleysteemer is coming tomorrow. The "new" landlord (who is an old friend, both literally and figuratively) has amessage on his phone about the tub faucet.... I'm sure he will be thrilled.

And now I am here.


Hi Justins!

Wow what a time!  I hope your arm and whole body are feeling better!  Maybe the Culligan guy shut the water off?  I hope you get that shower fixed soon!

Good luck on the move!

Sincerely,
Missin Nat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 08:40:43 PM
Take good care of my baby...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 09, 2006, 08:40:54 PM
.
Lots of things give me the creeps.  

 :?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:42:10 PM
Justins; Try running the water for a while.  Sounds like a sediment build-up.  Use baking powder and vinegar to flush out the drains.
BE CAREFUL- the fall from the sink could have been deadly!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:43:58 PM
BAKING SODA and vinegar.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 09, 2006, 08:44:03 PM
.
Check you Monkeys later. . . . . . .

Anna walking. . . . . . . .

(with all due credit to Hat of course)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 08:44:58 PM
Best thing in life is free!  Hmmmmm, Hmmmmm…..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:46:05 PM
Anna wrote:
Quote
Well, There is a House in Nu Orleens,
They call it the Rising Sun!
It's been the ruin of many a poor boy,
And God I know I'm one.

Better be careful there, Easy~


BEWARE OF MARIE LEVEAU! :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 09, 2006, 08:49:26 PM
I don't have hopes and dreams...

and I don't have plans and schemes......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 09, 2006, 08:49:58 PM
Do you remember?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:51:02 PM
Well I wonder, wonder who........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 08:51:17 PM
"Turn, Turn, Turn"  The Byrds
http://tinyurl.com/eco52
Love it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Houdini on July 09, 2006, 08:52:22 PM
All the leaves are brown.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 08:52:22 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Check you Monkeys later. . . . . . .

Anna walking. . . . . . . .

(with all due credit to Hat of course)


Bye Anna!  Have a great walk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 09, 2006, 08:59:44 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I am interested if Monkeys in their hearts think this case will ever be solved?

We All have the common goal of wanting it solved, that goes without being said.

But I'm having my doubts, hope I am wrong but don't think it will be.

By solved, I mean that justice will be served.  I think we all pretty much agree that Aruba had the right suspects with the three and Paulus.

Any thoughts?


I believe this case was solved long ago.  The three suspects raped and killed Natalee, and papa sloot helped get rid of the evidence.  

Its just a matter of finding someone in Aruba to do anything about it.  I do not think that will ever happen unless for some reason the FBI were to get involved.


I don't think this case has been solved, and won't be until the following questions are answered:  

1) Which of the three are guilty, and which are the most guilty? Altho it's obvious that the truth lies with the trio, and that Joran in particular is definitely guilty of some crime against Natalee, their respective levels of involvement aren't clear.  Was Joran the sole perpetrator and were 2K basically just the drivers?  Or did Joran rape her but it was 2K that came back and killed her?  Are Joran and Deepak both guilty and Satish innocent?  Or is it Joran and Satish guilty and Deepak innocent?  There are multiple plausable combinations and scenarios.  

2) How did she die?  

3) Was anyone else involved besides the trio, either before or after her death? My feeling is that Art Wood is probably wrong about a many as 5 people being involved, not totally implausable it could have been that many but I think  it was more like 2 or 3, and it could very well be that Joran alone raped, killed, and disappeared her and Joran is the only person on Earth who knows where she is.  

4) Where is she now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 09:05:08 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Mishy wrote:
Quote
BTW, can anyone tell me how someone saying "bless your heart" turned in to a bad thing? I have always used it as a term of sympathy, endearment, and commiseration...would somebody be so kind as to fill me in? I've been wondering this for MONTHS!!


It's ambiguous enough to be used both as a compliment and a "backhanded" insult.  Depends on your inflection.

Another one is "Nice".  Somebody pays you money they owe you.....Nice!


Somebody backs into your car on the parking lot...........Oh Nice! :lol:


Thanks Houdini...I've been enjoying your and Easy's reparte today  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:06:25 PM
HI EVERYONE; what's shakin'?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:07:29 PM
hey, HOUDINI, what part of Balmer are you from?  (don't say if you don't wanna, hon)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 09, 2006, 09:12:43 PM
Night all!   Sweet dreams.  God bless Nat and her family and friends.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 09:12:58 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely. So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


I could be wrong, and if I am, I relish any one of the southern belles on this board to correct me.  I thought this was an accepted and popular way for a southern lady to diss someone.  "Well bless her heart".  But it was also used as a compliment.

Any y'all ladies care to correct this "on the mason/dixon line yankee? :lol:


Houdini, as far as I've always known, as far South as B'ham, AL, "bless your heart" has always had nothing but the best intentions behind it...Maybe I'm traveling in the wrong circles  :shock:  :shock:

Nah....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:15:58 PM
no, i've always lived south of the Mason-Dixon Line, and Bless Your Heart is a good thing ... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: justinsmama on July 09, 2006, 09:19:14 PM
I'm beat. Gonna read the transcript from last night's show, and then hit the monkey bunkey. 'Nite, all. XXOO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 09:21:27 PM
night Justins! Sweet dream!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:21:46 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE; what's shakin'?

Reminder to all - Windsor = the former GretaRocks  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:22:17 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/DOMPIGNO2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 09, 2006, 09:24:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Windsor"
HI EVERYONE; what's shakin'?

Reminder to all - Windsor = the former GretaRocks  :lol:


Thanks Klaas, for the reminder...Now I remember reading that when I was lurking last week...

Hi Windsor!!!! Nice name change  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ldstlou on July 09, 2006, 09:24:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/DOMPIGNO2.jpg)


too funny...how do you come up with these?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 09:25:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
It's been over 13 months since Natalee Holloway went missing in Aruba.  Many of us have been following the case since the very beginning.  Few of us expected the hatred and outright lies spewed by some posters.  SCARED MONKEYS WANT'S JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.  We stand behind the Holloway/Twitty families.  WE WILL NOT GIVE UP.  Now is not the time for family friendly sites to bicker amongst themselves.  Discussing it is a distraction from the case and serves no purpose, IMO.


Here's to you & Anna.  

Apologies for anything I might have said to cause any problems for any monkeys.  I know we are all here to help Beth & Dave, in memory of Natalee.  

(http://bestsmileys.com/drinking/8.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 09:26:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/DOMPIGNO2.jpg)


Either in law enforcement or medicine.   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 09:27:15 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
no, i've always lived south of the Mason-Dixon Line, and Bless Your Heart is a good thing ... :D
:lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 09:30:26 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Houdini"
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely. So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


I could be wrong, and if I am, I relish any one of the southern belles on this board to correct me.  I thought this was an accepted and popular way for a southern lady to diss someone.  "Well bless her heart".  But it was also used as a compliment.

Any y'all ladies care to correct this "on the mason/dixon line yankee? :lol:


Houdini, as far as I've always known, as far South as B'ham, AL, "bless your heart" has always had nothing but the best intentions behind it...Maybe I'm traveling in the wrong circles  :shock:  :shock:

Nah....


Just coming into the cage.... and I will once again own up to the BLESS YOUR HEART thing.....  :lol:

for those  of you above the Mason Dixon line... it's the same as forgetaboutit.... has all kinds of different meanings...

once Red caught me using it in the negative to someone who was being mean to me.... LOL... I said well, bless your heart... meaning why are you so stupid???  but I also use it to mean well... .. but most of the time... I am being bad, bad Mrs. Red.... :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:34:02 PM
well, thanks Klaas and Mishy -- I do like my new name ...

got quiet in here   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:34:59 PM
Mrs. Red - did you see Joran's new summer job?

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:37:14 PM
hey ya'll; gotta tell you a good story (well, I think it's good)

daughter came home from college town for 4th of July; brought good (spunky) friend

Dave Holloway's book was on my table; I told daughter's friend to look at it; she said, "Oh, it's about the missing girl in Aruba"

Well, she went on to tell me how she will not allow anyone to hand her a drink; she insists on watching them pour it, even if it's from a keg, a bar, whatever

when she walks through a room, she puts her hand over the cup so no one can slip something in it on the sly

one smart cookie ....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 09:37:41 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
As this forum belongs to Red and Tom, any poster that they have allowed to post here is deserving of at least being treated in a civil manner.  Launching personal attacks and questioning the motives and loyalties of others seems to be happening more often of late.  I know there is not much new to discuss but I don't think we should be referring to other posters as though they are not going to read it and blasting them especially when they are being supportive of the family in this tragedy.

Some try to pretend there is a rift between BFN and this site when none exists and trying to eliminate one of the other few remaining pro-Natalee sites is just not the direction in which I personally want to go.  We need all the sites for Natalee as there are so few remaining now.  I don't understand why attacking any one of them is helpful.  Take them down one by one until none are left?  I'd hate to see that happen.  JMO.

.


Reading back... and I don't know what has been said... but THERE IS NO RIFT BETWEEN US AND BFN.... there never has been and won't be.... ANNA is right... this is not the time for pro-sites to turn against pro-sites...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:39:01 PM
oh, and she kept saying, "I'm not gonna get roofied," which worried me a bit since my daughter is in the same college town, of course ...   just hope my daughter is as smart/streetwise as her friend.  She said many girls there have been "roofied."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 09:40:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Mrs. Red - did you see Joran's new summer job?

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/McSloot.jpg)

 :lol:  :lol:


OMG... I just got my monitor wet... LOL>>>>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:41:35 PM
Mrs. Red - how about when all the rats jump ship?

 :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/ssrefugeeS.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 09:41:36 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
oh, and she kept saying, "I'm not gonna get roofied," which worried me a bit since my daughter is in the same college town, of course ...   just hope my daughter is as smart/streetwise as her friend.  She said many girls there have been "roofied."

Windsor, I am sure your daughter is very smart...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 09:43:09 PM
OMG>.. Klassend that is AWESOME... are they really jumping ship now that they know their hero is a murderer( Imo)??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:44:31 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OMG>.. Klassend that is AWESOME... are they really jumping ship now that they know their hero is a murderer( Imo)??


Last night there was nobody online.  They have had some activity today but they are slowing down fast.  Like I said, like rats jumping ship.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:46:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OMG>.. Klassend that is AWESOME... are they really jumping ship now that they know their hero is a murderer( Imo)??


Last night there was nobody online.  They have had some activity today but they are slowing down fast.  Like I said, like rats jumping ship.


Scrux is closed to posting. Freedom of Blog gets almost zero action. Refugees are dwindling fast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:47:05 PM
well, what's the evidence that makes them feel that Joran did it?  what's different than a year ago?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:47:49 PM
oh, just dawned on me -- the well is running dry in Aruba; no more $$ to pay the posters -- is that it??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:50:44 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
oh, just dawned on me -- the well is running dry in Aruba; no more $$ to pay the posters -- is that it??


Well, I'm not suggesting that the majority of the posters were paid.  I do believe that a handful may have been doing a favor for ATA.  The rest are followers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 09:52:36 PM
I know, Klaas; I just can't believe there are evil people out there

It's amazing how the good always comes out on top


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on July 09, 2006, 09:52:38 PM
Has anyone heard from None?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 09:55:50 PM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Has anyone heard from None?


Yes, spoke to her via IM today.  She has had a busy weekend.  Her husband is very tired but done with treatments for a couple weeks.  Her cat is in labor again...2 still born so far.  She's taking her to the vet tomorrow.  Nonesuche is overworked and tired, but they are OK.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 09:57:30 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
oh, and she kept saying, "I'm not gonna get roofied," which worried me a bit since my daughter is in the same college town, of course ...   just hope my daughter is as smart/streetwise as her friend.  She said many girls there have been "roofied."


That is quite the social commentary on today's world isn't it that our kids have to worry about being "roofied", being shot to death at school, and skyscrapers being toppled?   :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Windsor on July 09, 2006, 10:05:53 PM
good night, monkey friends


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 10:06:10 PM
So what is the topic.... ??  Are we discussing more of what Art said??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 10:07:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OMG>.. Klassend that is AWESOME... are they really jumping ship now that they know their hero is a murderer( Imo)??


Last night there was nobody online.  They have had some activity today but they are slowing down fast.  Like I said, like rats jumping ship.


Scrux is closed to posting. Freedom of Blog gets almost zero action. Refugees are dwindling fast.


I wonder if this has anything to do with the Medley thing.  Some of it is probably due to the well drying up ($), and lack of media coverage.  There's still plenty of ugliness being slung around over at the AOL board.  Of course those bashers are still trying to breathe life into a few of ole' Hairy Toe's old op-eds.   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 09, 2006, 10:08:29 PM
Quote from: "Windsor"
oh, just dawned on me -- the well is running dry in Aruba; no more $$ to pay the posters -- is that it??


I think you are on to something!!! Arlene was quit being paid -- she is silent. Steve Cohen quit getting paid -- he is silent. The "golden goose" quit laying eggs -- the vile pro-Joran posters are going silent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:09:38 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
So what is the topic.... ??  Are we discussing more of what Art said??

We were yes.  I found a post by Arubagirl from back last June where she said that the Kalpoe father owned a car rental place.  I'm looking for that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 10:13:20 PM
OVERHEARD IN ARUBA
Anxious woman: Is this the police department?
Aruban Police Dispatcher: Yes it is. How can I help you?
Anxious woman: I'd like to report a dead body on the cliffs up by the California Lighthouse.
Aruban Police Dispatcher: I'm sorry, we're not accepting any new dead bodies, we've already reached our quota for this year.

More at   http://tinyurl.com/ftr7b


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:14:40 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
OVERHEARD IN ARUBA
Anxious woman: Is this the police department?
Aruban Police Dispatcher: Yes it is. How can I help you?
Anxious woman: I'd like to report a dead body on the cliffs up by the California Lighthouse.
Aruban Police Dispatcher: I'm sorry, we're not accepting any new dead bodies, we've already reached our quota for this year.

More at   http://tinyurl.com/ftr7b


It would be really funny if it weren't so true!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on July 09, 2006, 10:17:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "tcumom"
Has anyone heard from None?


Yes, spoke to her via IM today.  She has had a busy weekend.  Her husband is very tired but done with treatments for a couple weeks.  Her cat is in labor again...2 still born so far.  She's taking her to the vet tomorrow.  Nonesuche is overworked and tired, but they are OK.

Thanks so much, Klass.  I've been there~my Dad and a teacher friend.  Sounds like he's holding his own.  Takes a tremendous toll on caregivers, too.  My thoughts are with them always, and of course, my prayers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 10:18:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
So what is the topic.... ??  Are we discussing more of what Art said??

We were yes.  I found a post by Arubagirl from back last June where she said that the Kalpoe father owned a car rental place.  I'm looking for that.


I remember that being said as well in the old Loco Stephie thread.  People were thinking that since the pics of Deepak, Joran, with Freddy, Stephie, Bailey & Alyce were taken in what looks to be a SUV, that maybe they swapped cars at Daddy's car rental.  Or maybe, the loaded SUV belonged to the PIMPles handler.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:19:50 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
So what is the topic.... ??  Are we discussing more of what Art said??


Hi (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/f0d7208e.gif) and others..Not sure what the heck is going on out here today...

Your Avatar showed up when the page came up  :shock:
and earlier there was some stuff about a JoeT,  some oriental sounding names and legal actions..   and even something about one of my Moms favorite saying
" You can not make a silk purse out of a pigs ear"  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Spock on July 09, 2006, 10:21:15 PM
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:22:58 PM
Here is an old TripAdvisor post from June 13th.  It's actually a copied SM front page post by Tom relaying a message of Arubagirls:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Trip%20Advisor/tripadvisorAGmessage.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:23:33 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
So what is the topic.... ??  Are we discussing more of what Art said??

We were yes.  I found a post by Arubagirl from back last June where she said that the Kalpoe father owned a car rental place.  I'm looking for that.


I remember that being said as well in the old Loco Stephie thread.  People were thinking that since the pics of Deepak, Joran, with Freddy, Stephie, Bailey & Alyce were taken in what looks to be a SUV, that maybe they swapped cars at Daddy's car rental.  Or maybe, the loaded SUV belonged to the PIMPles handler.


Very likely.  The car probably did have chocolate in it and cleaning fluid.  Those rental places do a thorough going over of those cars.  I guess they could sacrifice one look-alike car to be sent off so Deepak could keep the one with the blood stains.  I am sure the rental agency told him how to clean them.  They do a good job of clean-up.  Of course, the reputable ones would report blood found in their rental cars but then this is Aruba we are talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:24:21 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


WELCOME SPOCK! To let you know, currently our avatar function isn't working.  Tom and Red are considering going to a different forum software that has less problems.  Feel free to add an avatar or photo to your signature line though!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:25:36 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


Welcome, Spock.  Good to have you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:26:18 PM
JUNE 13, 2005

"Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba"
[/size]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:27:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005

"Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba"
[/size]


Pravada, Aruba style.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 10:28:11 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


Hi Spock... I have been reading you from afar... :shock:

good to meet you!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sam on July 09, 2006, 10:28:12 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


HI Spock nice to have you here.

Hi all you Monkeys. I have got shut off 3 times in the last few minutes. Lousy phone modem. I went to make a post to Windsor and Mrs. Red.

Mrs Red you can correct me if I am wrong. I thought it was you and Darleen that said when you have badmouthed someone in order to Justify it at the end you say Bless there Heart. That it was the Southern way.

I wish I had something to add here about the case. I just have prayers for Natalee and her family.

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:28:38 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


Spock(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/f58a1202.gif) and just jump on in...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 10:31:00 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


HI Spock nice to have you here.

Hi all you Monkeys. I have got shut off 3 times in the last few minutes. Lousy phone modem. I went to make a post to Windsor and Mrs. Red.

Mrs Red you can correct me if I am wrong. I thought it was you and Darleen that said when you have badmouthed someone in order to Justify it at the end you say Bless there Heart. That it was the Southern way.

I wish I had something to add here about the case. I just have prayers for Natalee and her family.

Sam


Actually Sam, it was me that owned up to the "southern" meaning - sometimes mind you- of bless your heart meaning "why are you so stupid"  and it can really mean bless your heart.... it's like the northern saying of forgetaboutit..... LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:31:15 PM
This was posted by a family member in the Trip Advisor forum on June 15, 2005.  I've blocked the name of the family member just in case.  Seems they knew early on what most likely happened:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Trip%20Advisor/tripadvisornat.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Spock on July 09, 2006, 10:31:31 PM
Thanks for the Hello's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: angelalala on July 09, 2006, 10:32:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005
Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba


Are they handing out maps of where the Arubanites should go to do the most protectioning... :?

Hello Spock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:33:29 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Thanks for the Hello's


Spock - did you see the SS REFUGEES?

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/ssrefugeeS.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:33:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005

"Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba"
[/size]


Wonder who was sending those e-mails and to whom in particular?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:33:54 PM
Oh, Klaas, you take all the fun out of it by blocking out the name. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Spock on July 09, 2006, 10:35:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005

"Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba"
[/size]


Sounds like the much talked about "gag-order"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:35:28 PM
Quote from: "angelalala"
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005
Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba


Are they handing out maps of where the Arubanites should go to do the most protectioning... :?

Hello Spock.


LOL  :lol:  :lol:  Well I think that we have all seen it first hand in the Bondia/Glenda and many others.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:38:41 PM
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.

edited to add:  JUNE 13, 2005


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sam on July 09, 2006, 10:39:04 PM
Well Klaas I do not think they did a very good job of protecting the name of Aruba. I think the sites they chose to post on just made them post mean, hateful things to annoy us Monkeys.

Bless there hearts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 10:39:34 PM
Quote from: "whytegirl"
CHICKS YOU GOTTA LOVE JOHNNY DEPP (About his love for his wife):

"I just knew, you know, it's over with," he told Oprah Winfrey of meeting French pop singer Vanessa Paradis in Paris in 1998. Since then the couple (in January) – who've never married – have been inseparable. "Our story is love and friendship united," she wrote in a tribute to Depp in French Elle. "I have the impression that no one could love the way we love."


O/T - just watched Donny Brasco last night - Johnny Depp and Al Pacino - very good!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 10:40:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "angelalala"
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005
Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba


Are they handing out maps of where the Arubanites should go to do the most protectioning... :?

Hello Spock.


LOL  :lol:  :lol:  Well I think that we have all seen it first hand in the Bondia/Glenda and many others.


Yes you can say that we have seen it first hand... and it should show just how desperately they will act to keep one s*****y island in a supply of tourists.... too bad that the Arubans don't understand our system...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 10:40:49 PM
BTW, good evening monkeys...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:42:35 PM
Well, of course, they hired Steve Cohen to direct their public relations, and he put them on communist control.  Could they not see how badly this worked for the USSR, or were they looking at some of their more near-winning political triumphs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:42:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.


Agree with you ~~~  mine was who was sending e-mails  Govt. PR person, or individuals and   where did they get e-mail addresses from~  to send stuff to
Just wondering


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Spock on July 09, 2006, 10:42:54 PM
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:43:56 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.


Agree with you ~~~  mine was who was sending e-mails  Govt. PR person, or individuals and   where did they get e-mail addresses from~  to send stuff to
Just wondering


Ah, good question.  I assume the government sent an email to all busnesses instructing them to tell their employees?  It could have worked like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:45:39 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.


Agree with you ~~~  mine was who was sending e-mails  Govt. PR person, or individuals and   where did they get e-mail addresses from~  to send stuff to
Just wondering


At the time this happened, I had an e-mail friendship with an Aruban business woman.  She was very forthcoming in telling me that employees were being paid to visit those websites and say horrific things about Beth.  The same people were putting together the ugly demonstration, and they chose a useful idiot who was a former American to do this in his name.  

Later as tourism started to decrease, this person became very adverserial and started saying Natalee was a slut and all Arubans knew that because she was and they turned against Beth because her daughter was a slut, dressed like a slut, and you wonder why Deepak said that.  Of course, this person waited until her shop's business started turning south, but she was quick to admit Beth had shopped with her and Beth was nice.  However, she became very angry when she had to start renting her propertly at about half what she had gotten for it before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Red on July 09, 2006, 10:46:16 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005

"Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba"
[/size]


Sounds like the much talked about "gag-order"


Welcome aboard Spock ...

Also sounds like when the Tourism Industry people told the people on-line not to post negative comments so that they gave Aruba a good face.

Well now that Aruba the "un"Truth is no longer and sever others are going the way side with the budget cuts ... their plan now is silence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:46:25 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.

Spock
Gotta ask... where did you hear that date from??  Been looking for a date & time of day for that meeting for a bit now..  Just wondering
TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.


Yes Spock, definately the coverup by the suspects began immediately or at least by the afternoon of the 30th.  I'm referring more to the Arubans who were posting on the websites.  Prior to June 13th they were more open.  After some were intent upon distracting discussions and protecting Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 10:46:42 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "whytegirl"
CHICKS YOU GOTTA LOVE JOHNNY DEPP (About his love for his wife):

"I just knew, you know, it's over with," he told Oprah Winfrey of meeting French pop singer Vanessa Paradis in Paris in 1998. Since then the couple (in January) – who've never married – have been inseparable. "Our story is love and friendship united," she wrote in a tribute to Depp in French Elle. "I have the impression that no one could love the way we love."


O/T - just watched Donny Brasco last night - Johnny Depp and Al Pacino - very good!


One of my favorite movies...and I love the scene where he explains all the meanings of forgetaboutit..... LOL... it's like Bless Your heart... :oops:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 10:48:08 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.


well she has her career to protect... like HAT would say,
"Drink deep Karin, you earned it."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:50:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.


Agree with you ~~~  mine was who was sending e-mails  Govt. PR person, or individuals and   where did they get e-mail addresses from~  to send stuff to
Just wondering


Ah, good question.  I assume the government sent an email to all busnesses instructing them to tell their employees?  It could have worked like that.


you think Aruban govt had e-mail address of all business (I'll bet they do now).  I was guessing it was more of family / individual thing..
remember Rubber Leggs was on a site listed as a "friend" ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 10:51:11 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Wanted to say hello to everyone on the board. Nice to be here. :D


Hey Spock - hello there, and welcome !!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Spock on July 09, 2006, 10:51:21 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.

Spock
Gotta ask... where did you hear that date from??  Been looking for a date & time of day for that meeting for a bit now..  Just wondering
TIA

We have alot of capable sleuths over at BFN that pretty well identified the date of the poolside meeting. Most believe it was the evening Beth arrived but earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 09, 2006, 10:51:25 PM
People, I think we agree that we have pretty much "solved" the crime. In fact, Aruba also "solved" the crime around June 10th, 2005.

Our mission now is to definitively prove the  WHO, WHAT, AND WHY
of the COVER-UP !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Buckeye on July 09, 2006, 10:52:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.


Yes Spock, definately the coverup by the suspects began immediately or at least by the afternoon of the 30th.  I'm referring more to the Arubans who were posting on the websites.  Prior to June 13th they were more open.  After some were intent upon distracting discussions and protecting Aruba.


So, like Art said, Joran confessed the 9th, but the typed transcipt on the 13th was different.  And coincidentaly the painting etc. was the 10th, 11th. No, nobody knew a thing....they just decided to make sure and warn everyone not to talk at the same time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on July 09, 2006, 10:53:12 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.


i know...i think she was sucking vanderstratenns .... :shock:
just saing hi......hope u r all well...nite monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 10:55:00 PM
BRB in a bit.  I'm working on something pretty cool that Anna sent me, if I can get it to work I'll post it.  Will be very funny.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 10:55:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.


Agree with you ~~~  mine was who was sending e-mails  Govt. PR person, or individuals and   where did they get e-mail addresses from~  to send stuff to
Just wondering


At the time this happened, I had an e-mail friendship with an Aruban business woman.  She was very forthcoming in telling me that employees were being paid to visit those websites and say horrific things about Beth.  
<<Snip>>

Sorry Tyler...
 a little dense tonight but on June 13, 2005 What Web sites are we talking about

Just wondering    TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:55:07 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Spock"
The coverup began early, perhaps with the poolsite chat on May30th. I still can't believe KJ cowboyed up the security guards when she already knew the HI dropoff story was a lie.

Spock
Gotta ask... where did you hear that date from??  Been looking for a date & time of day for that meeting for a bit now..  Just wondering
TIA

We have alot of capable sleuths over at BFN that pretty well identified the date of the poolside meeting. Most believe it was the evening Beth arrived but earlier.


So you are saying it was the night/morning of 30/31, right?

I wonder if Mickey Johns ever told us that?  FOM, where are you?  Can we ask MJ if he knew the date of that meeting and time?  Or did he already say that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 09, 2006, 10:55:23 PM
Evening monkeys.  Is Tylergal still serving cake? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:56:09 PM
OF, if I recall there were some to come to SM, some to RWV and others to Trip Advisor.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 10:56:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, of course, they hired Steve Cohen to direct their public relations, and he put them on communist control.  Could they not see how badly this worked for the USSR, or were they looking at some of their more near-winning political triumphs.


Shoot, Aruba was too busy avoiding work, drinking, drugging, fornicating & prevaricating to really think it all through.   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 10:58:27 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of course is that almost immediately after the confession and retraction Aruba went into damage control mode.  That is when the coverup was in full swing.


Agree with you ~~~  mine was who was sending e-mails  Govt. PR person, or individuals and   where did they get e-mail addresses from~  to send stuff to
Just wondering


LOL.  I know, I know!! :::::waving hand frantically:::::::
They went to the Tickle sites and searched for Aruba.   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 10:58:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Evening monkeys.  Is Tylergal still serving cake? :lol:


It took too long to bake it and I'll never have that recipe again....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:00:06 PM
OF, mad as you used to get at me about BonDia, you see in retrospect, I had already been apprised of what was taking place. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 11:04:14 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
OF, mad as you used to get at me about BonDia, you see in retrospect, I had already been apprised of what was taking place. :wink:


I remember when I got "hip" to Bondia... it was the night she laughingly told me that they all knew the landfill witness was a liar and then said that Red, Dave and TES wanted to dig there, so they let them....

and OMG how sick they were when they got home....

from that point on.... I was all Tyler ROCKS.....LOL.. but before then, I was suckered too....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:05:06 PM
Spock
TY ... I had always wondered about MJ wording or "with the family"
I was guessing it was Monday after school or later in the day but then like I said "with the family" has always bugged me.

Tyler
TY... I cannot remember a lot from June of 2005 here and I was not at any other sites.. Like I said just wondering what sites

BTW..
Has anyone ever  confirmed when younger the brothers returned ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 11:05:58 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Blah - so was it cool there in person?


it was incredible.  All of the video and pictures just cannot do justice, it is something that I am very glad I was able to experience in person.  It was a good day for this country, as Ted Nugent would say - "you cant do that in France"

(we saw mickey mouse, the shuttle launch, and ted nugent blow the roof off the house of blues all on the same vacation.  What a trip)


YOWSA!  :D Love Ted Nugent and I've been down there for a launch a long time ago..it IS fine!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:06:26 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"

One of my favorite movies...and I love the scene where he explains all the meanings of forgetaboutit..... LOL... it's like Bless Your heart... :oops:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


O/T
If you have never watched the deleted segments, you must.  There is one that is just hilarious.  Remember the lion that they were feeding all the hamburgers to?  There is a deleted segment with the lion being walked down the street with a collar like a dog, and one where he is riding in the back of the vehicle, and the diner scene where they order all the hamburgers 'hold the onions'.  It was cut because it was not believable, but it was so funny!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:08:54 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
We have alot of capable sleuths over at BFN that pretty well identified the date of the poolside meeting. Most believe it was the evening Beth arrived but earlier.


Must be the relatives :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 11:09:08 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "mrs. red"

One of my favorite movies...and I love the scene where he explains all the meanings of forgetaboutit..... LOL... it's like Bless Your heart... :oops:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


O/T
If you have never watched the deleted segments, you must.  There is one that is just hilarious.  Remember the lion that they were feeding all the hamburgers to?  There is a deleted segment with the lion being walked down the street with a collar like a dog, and one where he is riding in the back of the vehicle, and the diner scene where they order all the hamburgers 'hold the onions'.  It was cut because it was not believable, but it was so funny!


I will do that!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:09:47 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
OF, mad as you used to get at me about BonDia, you see in retrospect, I had already been apprised of what was taking place. :wink:


Tyler
as dad always said... sometime you can learn a lot from someone that is trying to feed ya a line (Canoshito). You just have to go with the flow, feed them  and take everthing with SALT. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:10:53 PM
Whasssss up monkeys??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:10:59 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
OF, mad as you used to get at me about BonDia, you see in retrospect, I had already been apprised of what was taking place. :wink:


Tyler
as dad always said... sometime you can learn a lot from someone that is trying to feed ya a line (Canoshito). You just have to go with the flow, feed them  and take everthing with SALT. :roll:


I like our new word!  Canoshito.   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:12:23 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
I said just wondering what sites

BTW..
Has anyone ever  confirmed when younger the brothers returned ?


I think Widget confirmed with the airlines  - can't remember the date, but it matched the date they said they came back to Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:13:28 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Hey Metro... what the heck country are you in this week-end.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 09, 2006, 11:14:38 PM
June 1, 2005 - 3 van der Sloots onboard KLM flight from Holland


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:15:09 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Altmetroguy - where in the world have you been - and where are you now   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:15:34 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
June 1, 2005 - 3 van der Sloots onboard KLM flight from Holland


TY Leslie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 11:15:57 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
BTgirl wrote:
Quote
Easy,

Please share some of whatever you're taking?

I think your drugs are better than mine.


Never buy Generic BT.  Go the extra bucks and buy the genuine stuff.

You know, come to think of it.....taking generic drugs may be what made your legs look like sweet potatoes. :lol:


 :lol: ROTFL!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:16:35 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Hey Metro... what the heck country are you in this week-end.

**********************
Hey OF!! I think I am in California...lol...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:17:41 PM
SunFreak2 - thank you for sending off that quick email to Larry Garrison last night regarding Dana's program and for the follow-up on it.  I hope it works out and he is a guest in the near future.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on July 09, 2006, 11:17:57 PM
Hi Tyler-

Did I hear a call-out for those who denied Bondia and lived to tell about it? You LIVED it tyler  :lol: our heroine  :lol:  8)  :lol:

Hi everyone-

Hope all are well, I was super proud of Klaas' phone call to Dana's show last night  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:18:44 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Altmetroguy - where in the world have you been - and where are you now   :wink:

********************
Heya Slueth...well it's been a long strange trip that just won't end..lol...I have been on the road for weeks!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:18:48 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "oldfart"
I said just wondering what sites

BTW..
Has anyone ever  confirmed when younger the brothers returned ?


I think Widget confirmed with the airlines  - can't remember the date, but it matched the date they said they came back to Aruba.

Yes Widget did get info on it.. back with Mom if I rememeber correctly but this is something that should not fall under the GAG order to confirm and to me makes a big difference in what actions may have occured at the VDS home.. Besides if not home if catches Joran in another lie.

JMO of course


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 11:19:16 PM
Quote from: "Houdini"
Jacqueline wrote:
Quote
Bless your heart "is" a good thing Mishy.

I cant say for sure, but I think there was little skirmish a while ago and it may have had a monkey saying Bless your heart, but not meaning it sincerely. So it just sort of caught on that Bless your heart was being used as a slam....


I could be wrong, and if I am, I relish any one of the southern belles on this board to correct me.  I thought this was an accepted and popular way for a southern lady to diss someone.  "Well bless her heart".  But it was also used as a compliment.

Any y'all ladies care to correct this "on the mason/dixon line yankee? :lol:


You're correct. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:20:40 PM
None, that was a long and winding road and I am so glad we were not lost too long!

AtlMetroguy, those places that have been calling us stupid southerners cowboys and all kinds of bad names are meeting their waterloo, per Klaas.  She needs to show you what she found in a newspaper.  It's the SS Refugee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 11:22:25 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Tyler-

Did I hear a call-out for those who denied Bondia and lived to tell about it? You LIVED it tyler  :lol: our heroine  :lol:  8)  :lol:

Hi everyone-

Hope all are well, I was super proud of Klaas' phone call to Dana's show last night  :wink:


Hiya Nonesuche - wait until you see the artwork I'm working on right now.. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:23:28 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Hey Metro... what the heck country are you in this week-end.

**********************
Hey OF!! I think I am in California...lol...

Out Sunday for a Monday morning meeting or are you out there helping Klaasend with a new phone system or other Monkey bussiness..  Wish I could think of our CA. Monkey.  Thirdstike, LV ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on July 09, 2006, 11:23:32 PM
Klaas is on SUCH a roll today  :lol:  :lol:

I can't wait !!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:23:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
None, that was a long and winding road and I am so glad we were not lost too long!

AtlMetroguy, those places that have been calling us stupid southerners cowboys and all kinds of bad names are meeting their waterloo, per Klaas.  She needs to show you what she found in a newspaper.  It's the SS Refugee.

***********************
Hey Tylergal....thats excellent news. I'll have to say it's quite the sore spot for me being a native Alabamian who transplanted to Georgia, I get so sick and tired of all the things people think happens in the South that has not happened in like 40 years!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on July 09, 2006, 11:25:19 PM
Hi Metro-

I hate to disappoint you but I was just telling San that our nightly news is showing mud wrassling along with the newscasters joking about moonshine and Nascar   :shock:

I feel like I'm surrounded by some major bless their hearts  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:25:28 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
None, that was a long and winding road and I am so glad we were not lost too long!

AtlMetroguy, those places that have been calling us stupid southerners cowboys and all kinds of bad names are meeting their waterloo, per Klaas.  She needs to show you what she found in a newspaper.  It's the SS Refugee.

***********************
Hey Tylergal....thats excellent news. I'll have to say it's quite the sore spot for me being a native Alabamian who transplanted to Georgia, I get so sick and tired of all the things people think happens in the South that has not happened in like 40 years!!


Klaas said their ship is sinking and she has some pictures someplace.  I hope she will present them again.  Ain't that good news!!!!  We know we ain't nothin' but dumb rednecks, but we know a thug when we seez 'em.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:25:53 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Hey Metro... what the heck country are you in this week-end.

**********************
Hey OF!! I think I am in California...lol...

Out Sunday for a Monday morning meeting or are you out there helping Klaasend with a new phone system or other Monkey bussiness..  Wish I could think of our CA. Monkey.  Thirdstike, LV ???

************************
Yep..but a bit more involved!! I'm starting a new job tomorrow morning and I am really excited about it. I'll be out here a few weeks a month for awhile but after that I'll really be burning up the road sotospeak!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:27:15 PM
None, I hope you and family are all doing well, including the kitties.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on July 09, 2006, 11:27:58 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
None, I hope you and family are all doing well, including the kitties.


we're improving and thank you for asking  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:28:22 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Metro-

I hate to disappoint you but I was just telling San that our nightly news is showing mud wrassling along with the newscasters joking about moonshine and Nascar   :shock:

I feel like I'm surrounded by some major bless their hearts  :lol:  :lol:

****************************
Oy...thats gotta be NBC17...lol....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 11:28:33 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
None, that was a long and winding road and I am so glad we were not lost too long!

AtlMetroguy, those places that have been calling us stupid southerners cowboys and all kinds of bad names are meeting their waterloo, per Klaas.  She needs to show you what she found in a newspaper.  It's the SS Refugee.

***********************
Hey Tylergal....thats excellent news. I'll have to say it's quite the sore spot for me being a native Alabamian who transplanted to Georgia, I get so sick and tired of all the things people think happens in the South that has not happened in like 40 years!!


More like 100 years...LOL...

Spock good to see you... and you too Metro...

 I am outta here...

Keep the faith Monkeys!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 11:28:49 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
OF, mad as you used to get at me about BonDia, you see in retrospect, I had already been apprised of what was taking place. :wink:


I remember when I got "hip" to Bondia... it was the night she laughingly told me that they all knew the landfill witness was a liar and then said that Red, Dave and TES wanted to dig there, so they let them....

and OMG how sick they were when they got home....

from that point on.... I was all Tyler ROCKS.....LOL.. but before then, I was suckered too....

I only became aware of how much damage that Julia was doing in about March of this year. Her and ScubaJap semed to have started an Anyone But Joran Coven. And I do mean COVEN.
.
Hello Spock.
Maybe BT will make a Spock monkey for you ! ! ( she's into sock monkeys )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:30:09 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"

Yep..but a bit more involved!! I'm starting a new job tomorrow morning and I am really excited about it. I'll be out here a few weeks a month for awhile but after that I'll really be burning up the road sotospeak!!


Congrats on the New Job !!
Burning up the road  or air ways :wink:
Will your comute be shorter or longer now  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:30:14 PM
ATLMETROGUY, I wish you the very best in your new endeaor and hope that you will have some down time in California to 'stop and smell the roses.'


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:30:31 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
OF, mad as you used to get at me about BonDia, you see in retrospect, I had already been apprised of what was taking place. :wink:


I remember when I got "hip" to Bondia... it was the night she laughingly told me that they all knew the landfill witness was a liar and then said that Red, Dave and TES wanted to dig there, so they let them....

and OMG how sick they were when they got home....

from that point on.... I was all Tyler ROCKS.....LOL.. but before then, I was suckered too....

I only became aware of how much damage that Julia was doing in about March of this year. Her and ScubaJap semed to have started an Anyone But Joran Coven. And I do mean COVEN.
.
Hello Spock.
Maybe BT will make a Spock monkey for you ! ! ( she's into sock monkeys )

*******************************
A coven?? I'm skeered now!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 09, 2006, 11:30:45 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
June 1, 2005 - 3 van der Sloots onboard KLM flight from Holland

Yes, that was the Wednesday when Anita came home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:31:56 PM
goodnight, Mrs. Red.  I hope you have a wonderful day at work tomorrow and that you are not too sore from all the honey-do chores you and Red did today.  Well, that's wishful thinking, but you can be proud of it tomorrow night once you see how lovely it is going to be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:33:24 PM
Kat_gram, it's now an easy-bake coven.  

See my signature line. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 11:33:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUNE 13, 2005

"Emails are going out that Arubans should go to the WEB to protect the name of Aruba"
[/size]


And didn't they ever ?????? By the gazillions...just like a cloud of mosquitoes. :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:34:32 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"

Yep..but a bit more involved!! I'm starting a new job tomorrow morning and I am really excited about it. I'll be out here a few weeks a month for awhile but after that I'll really be burning up the road sotospeak!!


Congrats on the New Job !!
Burning up the road  or air ways :wink:
Will your comute be shorter or longer now  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

*****************
Thanks OF...well I think the commute is subjective..when I'm home it's about 30 seconds!! When I'm out here it's about 4.5 hours of airflight time...lol...it's all good though as no longer do the Atlanta rush hour..it's like getting my life back..lol...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:35:57 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
ATLMETROGUY, I wish you the very best in your new endeaor and hope that you will have some down time in California to 'stop and smell the roses.'

********************
Thanks Tylergal!! The only thing I have been smelling lately is jet fuel..lol..Although I think things will improve!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on July 09, 2006, 11:36:35 PM
Night Mrs Red, I'm not far behind you.

Guys, don't let Metro fool ya, he's gotten a really great position with a global leader so he's a bonafide mover and shaker !!! Congrats Metro  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 11:36:51 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
goodnight, Mrs. Red.  I hope you have a wonderful day at work tomorrow and that you are not too sore from all the honey-do chores you and Red did today.  Well, that's wishful thinking, but you can be proud of it tomorrow night once you see how lovely it is going to be.


Nite Tyler...thanks.. I am already sore... I will be proud when it's finished!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 11:37:41 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
SunFreak2 - thank you for sending off that quick email to Larry Garrison last night regarding Dana's program and for the follow-up on it.  I hope it works out and he is a guest in the near future.


It was my pleasure.  It was great to be actually able to contribute to this great gang of monkeys here.  I didn't want to overstep any bounds, but when Terry said he would like to hear Larry on Dana's show too and Easy said to just write to him, I did.   It's amazing the friendships and bonds that have been formed in Natalee's honor.  I've become great friends with his sister, and one day she had me call Larry about a question I had.  He is such an approachable person, and so is she.  I can ceratinly understand why Dave chose them to write his book with him.  I'll follow up tomorrow and see if a date has been selected yet.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 09, 2006, 11:38:03 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Night Mrs Red, I'm not far behind you.

Guys, don't let Metro fool ya, he's gotten a really great position with a global leader so he's a bonafide mover and shaker !!! Congrats Metro  :D


Nigth None, hope things are ever improving.. still keeping you in our thoughts!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:39:04 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Night Mrs Red, I'm not far behind you.

Guys, don't let Metro fool ya, he's gotten a really great position with a global leader so he's a bonafide mover and shaker !!! Congrats Metro  :D

********************
Heh..truth is I can sell ice to eskimos hence the new position!! when they figure out I'm fulla crap they are gonna send me packing...lol...

Thanks None...all the best to you and the Mr.!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:40:40 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"

<<snip>>
Thank OF...well I think the commute is subjective..when I'm home it's about 30 seconds!! When I'm out here it's about 4.5 hours of airflight time...lol...it's all good though as no longer do the Atlanta rush hour..it's like getting my life back..lol...


Gotta ask..4.5 hrs..  flight time.. as compared to Alanta comute time.
which is safer an more relaxing and was that one or two days comute time in Alanta ... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: nonesuche on July 09, 2006, 11:40:41 PM
Thanks Mrs Red, I appreciate it. Just been a very demanding time and I blew my lappy out, but up and running again now.

Klaas I'm gonna be watching for that post of yours, but will do so from afar, my bed is calling me and I've got an early day tomorrow.

Metro, I hope you get to play some golf while you're in CA !!!

Take care all !!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:42:15 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Altmetroguy - where in the world have you been - and where are you now   :wink:

********************
Heya Slueth...well it's been a long strange trip that just won't end..lol...I have been on the road for weeks!!


Weren't you switching jobs but it was an elongated deal (hope I have that right).  Hopefully it will lighten up a bit for you.  Regardless, it is great to see you stop by tonight...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 09, 2006, 11:43:13 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"

<<snip>>
Thank OF...well I think the commute is subjective..when I'm home it's about 30 seconds!! When I'm out here it's about 4.5 hours of airflight time...lol...it's all good though as no longer do the Atlanta rush hour..it's like getting my life back..lol...


Gotta ask..4.5 hrs..  flight time.. as compared to Alanta comute time.
which is safer an more relaxing and was that one or two days comute time in Alanta ... :wink:

**********************************
Heh..heh...well the flight time is pretty relaxing when I get the lucky dog (or is that monkey) upgrade to first class...free drinks and food!! Plus a better selection of movies!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:43:28 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
SunFreak2 - thank you for sending off that quick email to Larry Garrison last night regarding Dana's program and for the follow-up on it.  I hope it works out and he is a guest in the near future.


It was my pleasure.  It was great to be actually able to contribute to this great gang of monkeys here.  I didn't want to overstep any bounds, but when Terry said he would like to hear Larry on Dana's show too and Easy said to just write to him, I did.   It's amazing the friendships and bonds that have been formed in Natalee's honor.  I've become great friends with his sister, and one day she had me call Larry about a question I had.  He is such an approachable person, and so is she.  I can ceratinly understand why Dave chose them to write his book with him.  I'll follow up tomorrow and see if a date has been selected yet.   :D


That is great news to hear.  I am happy that you did this as well.  There should be some great tid-bits in Dana's program when he has Larry on.  Good, good, good for you!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on July 09, 2006, 11:44:59 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Tyler-

Did I hear a call-out for those who denied Bondia and lived to tell about it? You LIVED it tyler  :lol: our heroine  :lol:  8)  :lol:

Hi everyone-

Hope all are well, I was super proud of Klaas' phone call to Dana's show last night  :wink:


I was here, but must have short memory.  When and how did we find out who Bonida was?  I missed it somewhere along the line......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 09, 2006, 11:48:11 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Night Mrs Red, I'm not far behind you.

Guys, don't let Metro fool ya, he's gotten a really great position with a global leader so he's a bonafide mover and shaker !!! Congrats Metro  :D

********************
Heh..truth is I can sell ice to eskimos hence the new position!! when they figure out I'm fulla crap they are gonna send me packing...lol...

Thanks None...all the best to you and the Mr.!!


Take care Metro..
Maybe you can introduce Grits and Okra to CA. and get in on a distribution % arrangement then :wink:

SeeyaBeyee all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:48:14 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Whasssss up monkeys??


Altmetroguy - where in the world have you been - and where are you now   :wink:

********************
Heya Slueth...well it's been a long strange trip that just won't end..lol...I have been on the road for weeks!!


Weren't you switching jobs but it was an elongated deal (hope I have that right).  Hopefully it will lighten up a bit for you.  Regardless, it is great to see you stop by tonight...


Sorry, Metro - I was back a few pages, and I see that you've already answered.  Congrats on the new job, and I'm glad that you will again have a life!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:48:17 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Tyler-

Did I hear a call-out for those who denied Bondia and lived to tell about it? You LIVED it tyler  :lol: our heroine  :lol:  8)  :lol:

Hi everyone-

Hope all are well, I was super proud of Klaas' phone call to Dana's show last night  :wink:


I was here, but must have short memory.  When and how did we find out who Bonida was?  I missed it somewhere along the line......


I suspected her right away.  I gave her a riddle once about it and she never responded and when she did not, I knew who it was.  She could not come out and deny who she was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 11:48:40 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
SunFreak2 - thank you for sending off that quick email to Larry Garrison last night regarding Dana's program and for the follow-up on it.  I hope it works out and he is a guest in the near future.


It was my pleasure.  It was great to be actually able to contribute to this great gang of monkeys here.  I didn't want to overstep any bounds, but when Terry said he would like to hear Larry on Dana's show too and Easy said to just write to him, I did.   It's amazing the friendships and bonds that have been formed in Natalee's honor.  I've become great friends with his sister, and one day she had me call Larry about a question I had.  He is such an approachable person, and so is she.  I can ceratinly understand why Dave chose them to write his book with him.  I'll follow up tomorrow and see if a date has been selected yet.   :D


That is great news to hear.  I am happy that you did this as well.  There should be some great tid-bits in Dana's program when he has Larry on.  Good, good, good for you!!!!


DITTO!! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 09, 2006, 11:49:31 PM
Bondia, Bondia, where do I begin?  She was always so.....well, she was.....
............................................ Sorry, I can't think of a single thing to say...........Gosh, that was so long ago.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Ono on July 09, 2006, 11:51:17 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Bondia, Bondia, where do I begin?  She was always so.....well, she was.....
............................................ Sorry, I can't think of a single thing to say...........Gosh, that was so long ago.   :lol:


That was before I ever  posted...I used to sit back and watch and read and think: "Why doesn't anybody catch onto her?" 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:51:44 PM
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Spock on July 09, 2006, 11:52:29 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Leslie"
June 1, 2005 - 3 van der Sloots onboard KLM flight from Holland


TY Leslie


But didn't Joran say that his dad had to leave the casino to get home and "watch my little brother"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:52:52 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Oh, Sleuth, do tell me you are sending it my way.  We have not had rain and it was so hot today, just really hot and humid.  Could I encourage you to do a rain dance.  I know you can! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 09, 2006, 11:53:06 PM
Hi Metro.  Were your ears burning yesterday?  Somebody had some questions about cell phone service in Aruba.  Does anybody remember the exact questions?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 09, 2006, 11:53:26 PM
Bondia, would drive me nuts.  I would ask her a question and she would spend more time dodging the question than trying to just answer it.  I was always so frustrated when she finally left.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on July 09, 2006, 11:54:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Tyler-

Did I hear a call-out for those who denied Bondia and lived to tell about it? You LIVED it tyler  :lol: our heroine  :lol:  8)  :lol:

Hi everyone-

Hope all are well, I was super proud of Klaas' phone call to Dana's show last night  :wink:


I was here, but must have short memory.  When and how did we find out who Bonida was?  I missed it somewhere along the line......


I suspected her right away.  I gave her a riddle once about it and she never responded and when she did not, I knew who it was.  She could not come out and deny who she was.


Tyler, because I respect you so much, you have my curiosity going now....  What was the riddle?  Elaborate!   Send me email (in profile) if you can with specifics.  I am just curious if we proved it was her.  I believe you, but dying how you/we factually figured it out!   Why does she continue to deny it at the other site knowing we read posts over thier?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on July 09, 2006, 11:55:56 PM
Thanks to all --

Research of first statements of jvds at ISA and other interesting review of early commentary and news is greatly appreciated.

I wanted to come to threads and acknowledge all who participated last nite: LCD #489 from pp 44-50 and first 10pps of #490.

Much to review & study.

Again to all: THANK YOU.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 09, 2006, 11:57:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Oh, Sleuth, do tell me you are sending it my way.  We have not had rain and it was so hot today, just really hot and humid.  Could I encourage you to do a rain dance.  I know you can! :lol:


(http://www.feebleminds-gifs.com/baby-14.gif)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:57:06 PM
It wasn't anything big.  She had just denied being Scubajap to me, who I knew she was not, so I just rephrased my question when I wanted to know if she was JR.

To him, I am she and to her I am also she and to me she is she and to me he is him and to me, I am me but to me you are Julia Renfro and although I am she to you, I am usually right.  I cannot remember the exact way I said it but she would have to admit or deny at that point and she opted not to answer me.

I knew she was not Scubajap based on her syntax so I wanted her to admit or deny and I just phrased the little ditty to prove my point. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 09, 2006, 11:57:43 PM
Hey Hammer, do you remember the cell phone question we wanted to ask Metro from last night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 09, 2006, 11:57:49 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Oh, Sleuth, do tell me you are sending it my way.  We have not had rain and it was so hot today, just really hot and humid.  Could I encourage you to do a rain dance.  I know you can! :lol:


(http://www.feebleminds-gifs.com/baby-14.gif)  :lol:
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 09, 2006, 11:59:01 PM
PLEASE NOTE - THIS IS ONLY A CARTOON - ANY RESEMBLANCE TO PERSONS REAL OR FICTIONAL ARE ACCIDENTAL:


{{on second thought}}

 :lol: :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 09, 2006, 11:59:46 PM
That dancing baby cracks me up.  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: oldfart on July 10, 2006, 12:00:05 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Tyler
was at a acquaintance house over the week-end.. His is an EMT... and had to show me his tomato plants

he had the durn things hooked up to IV BAGS type drips... :shock:
Wooden stake, old 1 gallon milk jug, cork stopper and the IV tubing and drip valve..

I should have asked how much a day they were getting but was so shocked by something so simple for irrigation I did not ask

SYB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 12:00:19 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
PLEASE NOTE - THIS IS ONLY A CARTOON - ANY RESEMBLANCE TO PERSONS REAL OR FICTIONAL ARE ACCIDENTAL:


{{I'll delete - don't want LaLa's to have nighmares}}

 :lol:


Is this what they meant in the English papers when they said Joran was all the rage in the right districts?!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on July 10, 2006, 12:02:23 AM
Night monkeys, see you guys later.  Yes, I will certainly have nightmares over that one Klaas.  Good heavens!  I feel faint.  Someone hug Nemo for me......sliding out the cage..... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:02:36 AM
Maybe I should delete it before the boss shows up, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 12:03:18 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
PLEASE NOTE - THIS IS ONLY A CARTOON - ANY RESEMBLANCE TO PERSONS REAL OR FICTIONAL ARE ACCIDENTAL:


{{I'll delete - was not intended to scare or give nightmares}}

 :lol:

************************
Now I'm really skeered!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 12:03:50 AM
Metroguy - If Charlie Croes had the cell phone records scrubbed, would they exist still on a higher level?  Last night At Wood told us that Sander G claimed his cellphone was lost that same day 29/30th.  Is there anyway to get those records outside of Charlie C.  Would they be available on the records of the person receiving the call even if it went to answer mode.  I think that was the gist of the questions. TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sb on July 10, 2006, 12:03:56 AM
Hi everyone!

Klaasend, has there been some kind of development over the last couple of days that has gotten all the refugee sites and bashers, etc. slowed down like they are? I have been kind of "out of the loop" since Friday afternoon and haven't been able to get in here much.

Everyone doing OK?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:03:57 AM
Night Lala's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:06:20 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Night Lala's

Sleuth - I'll trust your judgement, should I delete it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:07:14 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Hi everyone!

Klaasend, has there been some kind of development over the last couple of days that has gotten all the refugee sites and bashers, etc. slowed down like they are? I have been kind of "out of the loop" since Friday afternoon and haven't been able to get in here much.

Everyone doing OK?


I don't know.  Scrux shut down to posting, Arubatruth shut down, Refugees is slowing down, FOB is almost no posting.  I don't know the reason.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 10, 2006, 12:08:25 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Hammer, do you remember the cell phone question we wanted to ask Metro from last night?

It was about Deepak's cellphone being " out of minutes " and if a phone was " out of minutes " could it still receive calls ?
Deepak says that he didn't call J or S inside C & C's because he was out of minutes. Then, later, Joran called him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:08:31 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Leslie"
June 1, 2005 - 3 van der Sloots onboard KLM flight from Holland


TY Leslie


But didn't Joran say that his dad had to leave the casino to get home and "watch my little brother"


Spock - I remember hearing something about that.  But the dates wouldn't mesh.  And I'd believe Widget and KLM  before Joran  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sb on July 10, 2006, 12:08:50 AM
Hmmmm....

Also, was there a C-Net broadcast with Art Wood last night? I thought that was on Sunday nights and hadn't heard about it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:09:50 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Night Lala's

Sleuth - I'll trust your judgement, should I delete it?


Perhaps.  But it was funny  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:10:10 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Hmmmm....

Also, was there a C-Net broadcast with Art Wood last night? I thought that was on Sunday nights and hadn't heard about it.


Yes, it was another good one.  You can still listen to it also there is a thread Sleuth started with the transcript.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:11:56 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Hmmmm....

Also, was there a C-Net broadcast with Art Wood last night? I thought that was on Sunday nights and hadn't heard about it.


SB - yes.  Dana had to take his daughter for college registration or something like that on Sunday so no program tonight - so he did it last night.  It is well worth listening to the podcast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 12:14:31 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
PLEASE NOTE - THIS IS ONLY A CARTOON - ANY RESEMBLANCE TO PERSONS REAL OR FICTIONAL ARE ACCIDENTAL:


{{on second thought}}

 :lol: :lol:  :lol:



Is this Joran's real job?  Did he get a gig dancing for Guido's friends?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:17:40 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"


(snip)
 Would they be available on the records of the person receiving the call even if it went to answer mode.  I think that was the gist of the questions. TIA


I'm not Metro and I didn't sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night, but I am familiar with some phone tracking software that places calls (during hurricanes, for example) and it tracks the numbers called and it knows:
-- if it connected
-- if someone answered
-- if no one answered but an answering machine picked up

Not sure if the cell phone records in this case would have this, but it is certainly possible to tell the difference.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 10, 2006, 12:18:01 AM
Quote from: oldfart
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Tyler
was at a acquaintance house over the week-end.. His is an EMT... and had to show me his tomato plants

he had the durn things hooked up to IV BAGS type drips... :shock:
Wooden stake, old 1 gallon milk jug, cork stopper and the IV tubing and drip valve..

.
We lived behind an engineer for Boeing. He had something similar with
carrots in tubes. The tubes were three feet long. He was doing an experiment to see how big the carrots could grow. The water and fertilizer was being distributed to the carrots in the tube in measured doses. He was a nice " nut ". Other hobby of his was cars. He carved a car body using Boeing fiberglass technology. For excitement, he would take his cat for bicycle rides. The cat would sit on his shoulder and they would whizz around the block a few times.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 12:18:51 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Hammer, do you remember the cell phone question we wanted to ask Metro from last night?

It was about Deepak's cellphone being " out of minutes " and if a phone was " out of minutes " could it still receive calls ?
Deepak says that he didn't call J or S inside C & C's because he was out of minutes. Then, later, Joran called him.


Yes, that is part of it.  Wasn't there something about the cellphone transmitting a porn tape for 8.5 minutes too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 12:20:27 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Metroguy - If Charlie Croes had the cell phone records scrubbed, would they exist still on a higher level?  Last night At Wood told us that Sander G claimed his cellphone was lost that same day 29/30th.  Is there anyway to get those records outside of Charlie C.  Would they be available on the records of the person receiving the call even if it went to answer mode.  I think that was the gist of the questions. TIA

***************************
Sunfreak2 - the only way Charles Croes could have any calling records scrubbed would be if he knew somebody at Digicel Aruba (they are the service provider) on a very personal level, since CC is a sales agent only meaning he is an independant businessman who is authrozed by Digicel Aruba to sell phones/service on the Digicel network. Basically he would not have access on his own to calling records independantly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:21:09 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Hammer, do you remember the cell phone question we wanted to ask Metro from last night?

It was about Deepak's cellphone being " out of minutes " and if a phone was " out of minutes " could it still receive calls ?
Deepak says that he didn't call J or S inside C & C's because he was out of minutes. Then, later, Joran called him.


Yes, that is part of it.  Wasn't there something about the cellphone transmitting a porn tape for 8.5 minutes too?


Yes it was could the 8 1/2 minute call have been a cell to cell video transmission.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 12:22:06 AM
.
OK, Klaas, I totally missed it.  Will you email me your funny?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:23:07 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
OK, Klaas, I totally missed it.  Will you email me your funny?

.


Gladly Anna


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:23:17 AM
Anna - cute new photo in your sig...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on July 10, 2006, 12:23:34 AM
Okay-since there aren't many monkeys around right now, let me ask what is surely an ignorant question:

All of this with the cell phones.......wouldn't Beth's cell phone bill detail out the time and the origination number?  
My Verizon bill shows all that stuff, but maybe it just depends on the company.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sb on July 10, 2006, 12:23:44 AM
I'm downloading the podcast and I took a quick look at the transcript.

Sounds like Art Wood has got the Gottenbos family under the microscope. I have been saying that Koen is one of the WEAK LINKS and that someone needs to lean on him- HARD. He knows something and has never said ANYTHING.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 12:24:18 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Metroguy - If Charlie Croes had the cell phone records scrubbed, would they exist still on a higher level?  Last night At Wood told us that Sander G claimed his cellphone was lost that same day 29/30th.  Is there anyway to get those records outside of Charlie C.  Would they be available on the records of the person receiving the call even if it went to answer mode.  I think that was the gist of the questions. TIA

*******************
Addendum - there would be records at Digicel Aruba depending on how long they archive that information. Meaning - the call traffic is recorded in both directions cell to cell or cell to land. In the case of land to cell then the land service provider would have those records independant of the cell service provider.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on July 10, 2006, 12:26:08 AM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Okay-since there aren't many monkeys around right now, let me ask what is surely an ignorant question:

All of this with the cell phones.......wouldn't Beth's cell phone bill detail out the time and the origination number?  
My Verizon bill shows all that stuff, but maybe it just depends on the company.


Edited to say that I'm talking about the "I don't know these people" phone call.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 12:26:34 AM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Okay-since there aren't many monkeys around right now, let me ask what is surely an ignorant question:

All of this with the cell phones.......wouldn't Beth's cell phone bill detail out the time and the origination number?  
My Verizon bill shows all that stuff, but maybe it just depends on the company.

****************************
TCUMOM - yes BHT's call records would show who called and when etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 12:28:08 AM
.
I am just rying to get my avatars to match.  Don't mind me.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: tcumom on July 10, 2006, 12:28:31 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
TCUMOM - yes BHT's call records would show who called and when etc.


Thanks, and so, do we know what came of that info ~ I mean, surely that was checked immediately.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on July 10, 2006, 12:32:11 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "tcumom"
Okay-since there aren't many monkeys around right now, let me ask what is surely an ignorant question:

All of this with the cell phones.......wouldn't Beth's cell phone bill detail out the time and the origination number?  
My Verizon bill shows all that stuff, but maybe it just depends on the company.

****************************
TCUMOM - yes BHT's call records would show who called and when etc.

I have Rogers and on the cell, every call is detailed. On the land, only out of area ie the extra charges are.
If the call came into Beth's land and went to a voice mail, I don't know if it would show if it was a direct dial.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 12:32:22 AM
Quote from: Kat_Gram
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Tylergal - O/T,

It is raining here right now - I just thought of you and your mention of your roses needing rain (not to mention the gorgeous photos of the roses in the pots, the gate and the bench).  Have you gotten any raindrops for those beautiful flowers??


Tyler
was at a acquaintance house over the week-end.. His is an EMT... and had to show me his tomato plants

he had the durn things hooked up to IV BAGS type drips... :shock:
Wooden stake, old 1 gallon milk jug, cork stopper and the IV tubing and drip valve..

.
We lived behind an engineer for Boeing. He had something similar with
carrots in tubes. The tubes were three feet long. He was doing an experiment to see how big the carrots could grow. The water and fertilizer was being distributed to the carrots in the tube in measured doses. He was a nice " nut ". Other hobby of his was cars. He carved a car body using Boeing fiberglass technology. For excitement, he would take his cat for bicycle rides. The cat would sit on his shoulder and they would whizz around the block a few times.


We used to hook ourselves up to IV fluids with some multivitamins, anti-nausea meds & something like pepcid and give it to ourselves and colleagues after a night of partying.  Worked like a charm.  The body & brain dehydrates from the alcohol, which is what causes the hangover headache.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 12:35:30 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Metroguy - If Charlie Croes had the cell phone records scrubbed, would they exist still on a higher level?  Last night At Wood told us that Sander G claimed his cellphone was lost that same day 29/30th.  Is there anyway to get those records outside of Charlie C.  Would they be available on the records of the person receiving the call even if it went to answer mode.  I think that was the gist of the questions. TIA

***************************
Sunfreak2 - the only way Charles Croes could have any calling records scrubbed would be if he knew somebody at Digicel Aruba (they are the service provider) on a very personal level, since CC is a sales agent only meaning he is an independant businessman who is authrozed by Digicel Aruba to sell phones/service on the Digicel network. Basically he would not have access on his own to calling records independantly.


Thanks.  That's good to know. So hopefully the records still exist.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:41:02 AM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Okay-since there aren't many monkeys around right now, let me ask what is surely an ignorant question:

All of this with the cell phones.......wouldn't Beth's cell phone bill detail out the time and the origination number?  
My Verizon bill shows all that stuff, but maybe it just depends on the company.


Not a silly question at all.  

Calls I have made from the US to Aruba have the date, time and indicate the call was placed to Aruba.

When I was last in Aruba I made and received a number of calls on my cell phone (my cell phone works as normal in Aruba- GSM).   A couple of months back I dug out my old phone bill for when I was there (had kept it for a tax-related reason) and all calls just had the same Aruba location, regardless if where in Aruba I made/received the call.  But it did have the time and origination number.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sb on July 10, 2006, 12:44:29 AM
One thing though that has always troubled me about the cell phone calls...

Virtually any scenario we can think of has Natalee incapacitated and in exigent circumstances IN SOME WAY by the 3 AM point on the timeline. It is hard for me to imagine her, especially if she was drugged, being able to handle (both mentally AND emotionally) the challenge of dialing Beth's US number on an unfamiliar cellphone, especially if a country code, etc. was needed to place the call. I have had family members call from overseas to my land line before, and the call process, for them to my US number, was no easy matter. And they were sober and lucid. Granted, that was 8 or 9 years ago and the mechanism for such calls may be more refined now... but I still think it would have been a real leap in the dark for her to have successfully gotten through, especially doing it "under wraps" with the fear of being discovered in the act.

That's why AL Gunslinger's comments about the call stand out so much. He asserts that the call DID happen and I believe it. Therefore, I'm trying to figure out HOW Natalee could have done it.

It implies that they didn't get Natalee as "out of it" as we wish... if (when) they abused her, she probably had an idea what was happening and her last moments would have been absolutely terrifying.

Plus, if she could make a cell call, she probably could have kept from "falling" and "hitting her head". Hint, hint. No accident.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 12:50:41 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
 
We used to hook ourselves up to IV fluids with some multivitamins, anti-nausea meds & something like pepcid and give it to ourselves and colleagues after a night of partying.  Worked like a charm.  The body & brain dehydrates from the alcohol, which is what causes the hangover headache.


 :lol:

We used to just take a Berocca before and after going out.  Drop a tablet in water - tasted like Tang...

BEROCCA - THE HANGOVER CURE THAT WORKS
Alcohol consumption and smoking, along with sleep deprivation, can take a significant tole on your body. That doesn't by any means mean you shouldn't be doing it, but when you do, treat yourself to a Berocca. Take one before you go out, and one when you're going to bed. Berocca will replace the materials your body needs in order to repair itself. Coupled with ginseng, Berocca will give you a major energy boost for a long day ahead, which is great if you have only had a few hours sleep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:53:40 AM
Quote from: "sb"
One thing though that has always troubled me about the cell phone calls...

Virtually any scenario we can think of has Natalee incapacitated and in exigent circumstances IN SOME WAY by the 3 AM point on the timeline. It is hard for me to imagine her, especially if she was drugged, being able to handle (both mentally AND emotionally) the challenge of dialing Beth's US number on an unfamiliar cellphone, especially if a country code, etc. was needed to place the call. I have had family members call from overseas to my land line before, and the call process, for them to my US number, was no easy matter. And they were sober and lucid. Granted, that was 8 or 9 years ago and the mechanism for such calls may be more refined now... but I still think it would have been a real leap in the dark for her to have successfully gotten through, especially doing it "under wraps" with the fear of being discovered in the act.

That's why AL Gunslinger's comments about the call stand out so much. He asserts that the call DID happen and I believe it. Therefore, I'm trying to figure out HOW Natalee could have done it.

It implies that they didn't get Natalee as "out of it" as we wish... if (when) they abused her, she probably had an idea what was happening and her last moments would have been absolutely terrifying.

Plus, if she could make a cell call, she probably could have kept from "falling" and "hitting her head". Hint, hint. No accident.

I agree SB, if she was able to get off a call I doubt at THAT point she was drifting in and out of conciousness.  I also believe that the reason something bad happened this time and not 20 times before is that Natalee wasn't willing, not even in a drunk or drugged out state.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 12:57:39 AM
SB - just a quick comment from me...international dialing on GSM cell phones is very simple and has been for about 5+ years. Basically if you are calling a number in the states on any GSM cell phone anywhere in the world you just dial the following string "+" "1" then AC, NPA, NXX or simply +1 205 555 1212 as an example. So, what I am saying is if NH was taught how to dial the "+" symbol she would already know the rest of the dial string to get a call out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:00:36 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
SB - just a quick comment from me...international dialing on GSM cell phones is very simple and has been for about 5+ years. Basically if you are calling a number in the states on any GSM cell phone anywhere in the world you just dial the following string "+" "1" then AC, NPA, NXX or simply +1 205 555 1212 as an example. So, what I am saying is if NH was taught how to dial the "+" symbol she would already know the rest of the dial string to get a call out.


Metro - what are the chances of the 8 1/2 minute cell call being a video transmission??  Cell to cell or cell to PC?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 01:03:20 AM
.
Metro,
What are the chances the records are still there fourteen months later?  How long will they be archived before they are deleted?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 01:08:49 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
SB - just a quick comment from me...international dialing on GSM cell phones is very simple and has been for about 5+ years. Basically if you are calling a number in the states on any GSM cell phone anywhere in the world you just dial the following string "+" "1" then AC, NPA, NXX or simply +1 205 555 1212 as an example. So, what I am saying is if NH was taught how to dial the "+" symbol she would already know the rest of the dial string to get a call out.


Metro - what are the chances of the 8 1/2 minute cell call being a video transmission??  Cell to cell or cell to PC?

************************************
I would say totally do-able as long as Digicel Aruba or the other carrier has a GSM/GPRS or a GSM/EDGE network. The GPRS will have slower data rates and the EDGE will be faster but what I am thinking is that based on available cell phones that would shoot video clips in May/June 2005 (would mean the phones were purchased a few to 6 months earlier) time frame those clips would be very short. Now having said that if the clip was shot by a video camera, especially digital then the data could be compressed and sent via laptop connected to a phone. Case in point I was no where near broadband last week and had my GSM phone connected to my laptop and was surfing at 230KBS and was downloading files..big ones that were taking 10+ minutes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 01:14:19 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Metro,
What are the chances the records are still there fourteen months later?  How long will they be archived before they are deleted?

.

*****************************
Anna...thats a tough one!! It all depends on how long the carrier keeps the records. Typically in the states those records are only held for 6 months or so. Reason being the amount of users on the network, think Cingular has 45 million customers...that would require terrabytes of storage, then Aruba with maybe 40K-60K subscribers..less users so less data less storage needs so it could be smewhat possible those records still exist on a backup server somewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 01:16:07 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
SB - just a quick comment from me...international dialing on GSM cell phones is very simple and has been for about 5+ years. Basically if you are calling a number in the states on any GSM cell phone anywhere in the world you just dial the following string "+" "1" then AC, NPA, NXX or simply +1 205 555 1212 as an example. So, what I am saying is if NH was taught how to dial the "+" symbol she would already know the rest of the dial string to get a call out.


What he said....

I just dialed + and then my regular numbers (beginning with 1).

People called me not realizing at all where I was - with crystal clear connections.  Full bars.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 01:18:18 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
SB - just a quick comment from me...international dialing on GSM cell phones is very simple and has been for about 5+ years. Basically if you are calling a number in the states on any GSM cell phone anywhere in the world you just dial the following string "+" "1" then AC, NPA, NXX or simply +1 205 555 1212 as an example. So, what I am saying is if NH was taught how to dial the "+" symbol she would already know the rest of the dial string to get a call out.


What he said....

I just dialed + and then my regular numbers (beginning with 1).

People called me not realizing at all where I was - with crystal clear connections.  Full bars.

******************************
Yep...GSM international roaming is a beautiful thing!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 01:22:13 AM
.
Some Play Stations will even receive short video clips.  See Joran on airplane going to Netherlands with the ever present ear phones and his Play Station.  Guess it has to have a Wi Fi card or something but they can be adapted to do it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:22:32 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
SB - just a quick comment from me...international dialing on GSM cell phones is very simple and has been for about 5+ years. Basically if you are calling a number in the states on any GSM cell phone anywhere in the world you just dial the following string "+" "1" then AC, NPA, NXX or simply +1 205 555 1212 as an example. So, what I am saying is if NH was taught how to dial the "+" symbol she would already know the rest of the dial string to get a call out.


Metro - what are the chances of the 8 1/2 minute cell call being a video transmission??  Cell to cell or cell to PC?

************************************
I would say totally do-able as long as Digicel Aruba or the other carrier has a GSM/GPRS or a GSM/EDGE network. The GPRS will have slower data rates and the EDGE will be faster but what I am thinking is that based on available cell phones that would shoot video clips in May/June 2005 (would mean the phones were purchased a few to 6 months earlier) time frame those clips would be very short. Now having said that if the clip was shot by a video camera, especially digital then the data could be compressed and sent via laptop connected to a phone. Case in point I was no where near broadband last week and had my GSM phone connected to my laptop and was surfing at 230KBS and was downloading files..big ones that were taking 10+ minutes.


Thanks Metro - how about a short 30-60 second one?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 01:22:57 AM
Klaas, I have a project for you.  As if you don't have enough already going on. Check your email.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:33:37 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Klaas, I have a project for you.  As if you don't have enough already going on. Check your email.  :shock:

 :lol:  :lol: Got it and responded


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 01:34:18 AM
.
If the suspects' statements can be made to disappear, I just worry
that the phone records could as well and that it might well be after
the time limit for getting back up copies.  Sure hope the FBI or HT's have hard copies in hand already.

There are reasons they keep stalling and stalling as they do.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:36:41 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
If the suspects' statements can be made to disappear, I just worry
that the phone records could as well and that it might well be after
the time limit for getting back up copies.  Sure hope the FBI or HT's have hard copies in hand already.

There are reasons they keep stalling and stalling as they do.

.

I'm hoping the Digicel records aren't controlled by Aruba.  Maybe the FBI was able to obtain the Digicel records within the 6 month time span.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:37:33 AM
I think I'm going to call it a night.  Will see you all tomorrow although I do have work to do tomorrow that should have been done today  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 01:40:20 AM
.
Me, too, Goodnight all.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on July 10, 2006, 01:40:21 AM
well I am all caught up now.
Hope everyone had a great day.
Metro, thanks for the cell info. That answered some of my questions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 01:42:07 AM
I just thought I'd do a search for Natalee Holloway just to see what would come up as I have not checked in a while.  I found this website/article that addressed the fact that the people of Aruba were not as helpful as some folks would have us think.  This was posted on August 12, 2005.  I am posting the link for anyone who wants to look at it.  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1462134/posts


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sb on July 10, 2006, 01:43:09 AM
It might be a question for Beth or someone close to Natalee, then: did she know how to dial from a GSM phone that way?

This also implies that the phone she had ahold of was pretty state-of-the-art. GSM service has really only been phasing in here in the US for the last 2 years or so... I remember how we had large gaps in GSM coverage on the provider I had up until recently. I know too that overseas they STARTED with better technology from scratch, so they are considered "ahead" of the US in cellphone technology as far as getting GSM coverage.

My info is somewhat dated, I know. Atlmetroguy has forgotten more about this subject than I have ever learned.

I just still can't quite bring myself to think Natalee could fire off a cell call THAT easily to the US under the circumstances she was in.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 01:43:32 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
If the suspects' statements can be made to disappear, I just worry
that the phone records could as well and that it might well be after
the time limit for getting back up copies.  Sure hope the FBI or HT's have hard copies in hand already.

There are reasons they keep stalling and stalling as they do.

.

I'm hoping the Digicel records aren't controlled by Aruba.  Maybe the FBI was able to obtain the Digicel records within the 6 month time span.

*********************
I'm not sure about criminal jurisdictation of the records but ultimately those records belong to both Digicel and the consumer and not the government.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 01:44:37 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Klaas, I have a project for you.  As if you don't have enough already going on. Check your email.  :shock:

 :lol:  :lol: Got it and responded


Back atcha.  LOL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on July 10, 2006, 01:46:01 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
well I am all caught up now.
Hope everyone had a great day.
Metro, thanks for the cell info. That answered some of my questions.

*****************************
Anytime Spooky!! Are you ready for September 2nd?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sb on July 10, 2006, 01:46:55 AM
OK, I'm heading out for the night too... see y'all tomorrow evening sometime!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on July 10, 2006, 02:00:54 AM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
well I am all caught up now.
Hope everyone had a great day.
Metro, thanks for the cell info. That answered some of my questions.

*****************************
Anytime Spooky!! Are you ready for September 2nd?


soooooo ready. I was reduced to watching soccer today :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:01:21 AM
Hey? Anybody here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:03:28 AM
I see the cell phone call has ben the topic of conversation. I remain confused. Wouldn't Beth's records show whose phone the call was made from?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 02:10:38 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I see the cell phone call has ben the topic of conversation. I remain confused. Wouldn't Beth's records show whose phone the call was made from?


Hello CBB (I'm just closing down for the night) - Beth's records would show the phone number and time of call, at a minimum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 02:11:40 AM
Just saw TerryD sneaking a peak in BTGirl's window.....

(http://www.tanmonkey.com/images/monkey/squirel-teases-dog.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 02:12:30 AM
Good night (or good morning) all.  Have a great Monday.

Praying for resolution for Natalee's family...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:14:39 AM
I may be talking to myself here, but if Beth's records show the number of the call, I don't care if that phone were sent to the moon, it still states that at the time the call was made, Nat was connected to the owner of that phone. I don't get it.............if the number was connected to ANY of the characters we have on the case list, that's extremely incriminating. I'm just dumbfounded that this call, established to be from Natalee, hasn't been front and center in all the interviews and media coverage. Even if it wasn't connected to any of the known players, that fact should have been sung on the hilltops by Tacky.
I want to believe that JQK is holding this close to the vest to surprise Tacky, but that doesn't make sense either. Greta covered the argument in New York, and no mention at all of this call was given. You have to figure that JQK would have used "monkey sounds" as circumstantial persuasion for this judge to hear the case, if not the number.  :?  ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:15:33 AM
Nite Sleuth! Sweet Dreams!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:15:44 AM
Good late evening/early morning everyone!!  Hope all had a good weekend...

What are we discussing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:19:51 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Good late evening/early morning everyone!!  Hope all had a good weekend...

What are we discussing?


Third.................I'm trying, again, to figure this phone call from Nat. It doesn't make sense to me. Klaas believes it, gunslinger swears to it, and it's generally accepted as fact here. I trust these guys, but I wish it added up for me too. I'm sure the problem is me, but I want to enthusiastically get on board, and I'm having trouble with it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:21:01 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Just saw TerryD sneaking a peak in BTGirl's window.....

(http://www.tanmonkey.com/images/monkey/squirel-teases-dog.jpg)


GREAT PIC! Love it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 02:21:10 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Good late evening/early morning everyone!!  Hope all had a good weekend...

What are we discussing?


Hey XXX - I'm leaving, but if you didn't catch Dana's program Saturday night, be sure and listen to the podcast.  Worth the time.   He talks about Koen and meeting with the assistant prosecutor, etc.

Otherwise, conversation centered around the early morning call and whether those records are still accessible, and if the 8.5 minute call could have been/was a video transmission.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Sleuth on July 10, 2006, 02:22:08 AM
Nite now.   See you soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:23:57 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Good late evening/early morning everyone!!  Hope all had a good weekend...

What are we discussing?


Third.................I'm trying, again, to figure this phone call from Nat. It doesn't make sense to me. Klaas believes it, gunslinger swears to it, and it's generally accepted as fact here. I trust these guys, but I wish it added up for me too. I'm sure the problem is me, but I want to enthusiastically get on board, and I'm having trouble with it.

CBB, I too have my difficulties placing faith in the fact that this call exists.  As you've stated, many people in here believe it to be fact...not subject to interpretation or debate.  I don't remember who it was, but one even told me they had heard the message directly, and that it was for sure Natalee who made it.  But again, like you, I tend to believe if it was authenticated, we'd have heard a LOT more about it then we have...even in the misinformed MSM...

Makes you say "Hmmmmm", that's for sure.

How was your weekend, BTW?  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:23:58 AM
Nite Sleuth................hope smiling angels watch over you as you sleep!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:26:03 AM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Good late evening/early morning everyone!!  Hope all had a good weekend...

What are we discussing?


Hey XXX - I'm leaving, but if you didn't catch Dana's program Saturday night, be sure and listen to the podcast.  Worth the time.   He talks about Koen and meeting with the assistant prosecutor, etc.

Otherwise, conversation centered around the early morning call and whether those records are still accessible, and if the 8.5 minute call could have been/was a video transmission.


Got it Sleuth...thanks!!  I did get the chance to hear the podcast this afternoon.  And, I did hear the question posed about a possible "video transmission" which would could have accompanied the call.  But, the question I'd have is...what kind of video were people speculating about?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:26:39 AM
Well, my weekend makes you go hmmmmmm, for sure!  :lol:
The sewer lines at my Mom's house backed up, and I'm waiting for the plumber to come this morning. I'm so afraid it's going to be major. The clean up was certainly major!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:28:51 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well, my weekend makes you go hmmmmmm, for sure!  :lol:
The sewer lines at my Mom's house backed up, and I'm waiting for the plumber to come this morning. I'm so afraid it's going to be major. The clean up was certainly major!!!!!


That sucks CBB!  I wish there was something I could do.  I know...I'll send some positive energy your way...cool??  ;)

Sewer line, huh?  Not a real good thing to have to deal with in the heat of summer... :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:30:30 AM
Hope your week-end was a little more full of pleasent events. Third!  :wink:
I did do my Salsa Lesson Friday night. I'm having a blast with it.

This will give you an idea of how it's going......... :lol:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7836547273687836884


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:35:00 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hope your week-end was a little more full of pleasent events. Third!  :wink:
I did do my Salsa Lesson Friday night. I'm having a blast with it.

This will give you an idea of how it's going......... :lol:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7836547273687836884


My weekend was actually very good CBB!  I almost feel bad saying that with yours not being as good...

My company had our yearly picnic on Saturday.  I work for a major company, so they spared no expense.  Probably ate (and drank) more then I should have, but the family had a GREAT time!  Was a little hot, but cooled down later on.  The today, we went to see "Pirates 2".  Movie was pretty good as well.  Rest of today was spent in the pool.  All in all, a very relaxing weekend.  I still wish yours was better though... :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:37:41 AM
Well, Third, I just got back from Pirates 2 about an hour ago, and agree with you. It was good! I read that Johnny Depp said he had no trouble with the character of Jack, after he realized that Pirates were the rock stars of their day. He just kept Keith Richards in mind, and he had it!!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:39:39 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well, Third, I just got back from Pirates 2 about an hour ago, and agree with you. It was good! I read that Johnny Depp said he had no trouble with the character of Jack, after he realized that Pirates were the rock stars of their day. He just kept Keith Richards in mind, and he had it!!!  :lol:


Yeah, my understanding is that he modeled "Jack Sparrow" after Keith Richards from the very beginning.  Even though I don't agree with Depp's political beliefs, he's a damn fine actor.  Did you know they already have most of part 3 done already?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:41:55 AM
O/T
No, I didn't know that, but with the way the movie ended, I knew there would be a third. Will it end there.................maybe we had better put an O/T on this.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:46:02 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O/T
No, I didn't know that, but with the way the movie ended, I knew there would be a third. Will it end there.................maybe we had better put an O/T on this.  :wink:


Ok, I get your hint CBB...;)  I'll leave it at that!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 02:48:50 AM
I wasn't hinting, honest! I just thought there might be someone who would appreciate skipping "us".  :lol:
I'm turning in Third.................You have a great nite, and sleep well when you turn in. Thanks for the Positive energy! I can FEEL it :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:51:53 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
...thanks for the Positive energy! I can FEEL it :wink:


Yea, I aim to please CBB!  You have a GREAT night yourself.  Hopefulyl see you tomorrow!  And, BTW...for those who who like to "skip us"...all I can tell them is they're missing some genuine chemistry!!   They could learn a thing or two...;)

OK, I'll let you sleep now...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 03:07:45 AM
Who is that naked woman doing the pole dance?  I like her tan line!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 03:10:32 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Who is that naked woman doing the pole dance?  I like her tan line!


Huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 03:14:01 AM
OK, I'm off to the dream factory now!  See you all 2morrow...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 03:15:28 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Who is that naked woman doing the pole dance?  I like her tan line!


Huh?


Oops!  Must be the wrong page!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 10, 2006, 06:08:26 AM
It's official: "Uncle Mike" Michael Chemidlin is free, back in
the United States, staying with family in New York. Uncle Mike had been
tentatively booked on the 1:00PM flight out of Africa on Saturday, July 8, but
we...

...read more at http://www.FreeUncleMike.com

 :lol: Good morning!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 06:22:10 AM
WAKE UP SLEEPY HEADS.....[/color]

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL MORNIN'  Ahhh
I think I'll go outside a while,
An jus' smile.
Just take in some clean fresh air, boy!
Ain't no sense in stayin' inside
If the weather's fine an' you got the time.
It's your chance to wake up and plan another brand new day.
Either way,
It's a beautiful mornin', Ahhh,
Each bird keeps singin' his own song.
So long!
I've got to be on my way, now.
Ain't no fun just hangin' around,
I've got to cover ground, you couldn't keep me down.
It just ain't no good if the sun shines
When you're still inside,
Shouldn't hide, still inside, shouldn't hide,
Ahhhh..Oh! (shouldn't hide) Ah, ah, Oh.....

(Do, do, Waaa) (Do, do, Waaa)

There will be children with robins and flowers;
Sunshine caresses each new waking hour.
Seems to me that the people keep seeing
More and more each day, gotta say, lead the way,
It's okay, wednesday, thursday, it's okay,
(Ahhh) monday, wednesday, friday, weekday, Ah, Ah, Ohhh.

(Do, do, Waaa)

Ah, Ah, Oh, Oh, (Do, Do - Aaaa)
Wooooo oo oo oh, oh, oh, Ah wo, do, waa
Ohhhhhhh.....Oh, Oh, Oh, .....
~~The Rascals~~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 06:42:53 AM
If I leave here tomorrow
Would you still remember me?

For I must be travelling on, now,
cause theres too many places Ive got to see.

But, if I stayed here with you, girl,
Things just couldnt be the same.
cause Im as free as a bird now,

And this bird you can not change.
Lord knows, I cant change.

Bye, bye, its been a sweet love.
Though this feeling I cant change.

But please dont take it badly,
cause lord knows Im to blame.

But, if I stayed here with you girl,
Things just couldnt be the same.

Cause Im as free as a bird now,
And this bird youll never change.

And this bird you can not change.

Lord knows, I cant change.

Lord help me, I cant change.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on July 10, 2006, 07:20:57 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
It's official: "Uncle Mike" Michael Chemidlin is free, back in
the United States, staying with family in New York. Uncle Mike had been
tentatively booked on the 1:00PM flight out of Africa on Saturday, July 8, but
we...

...read more at http://www.FreeUncleMike.com

 :lol: Good morning!


Good morning!  I am so glad to hear Uncle Mike is home.  Great news, Jac.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on July 10, 2006, 07:37:20 AM
Good Morning Monkeys

Was reading the Digicel comments & GSM questions, so did a little reading
Found this info:

http://www.digicelgroup.com/group/who_we_are.php
<snip>
As the largest GSM mobile operator in the region our plans are to extend our foothold into other Caribbean countries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 07:44:47 AM
This song if for Uncle Mike:

I'm free to do what I want any old time

(m. jagger/k. richards)

I'm free to do what I want any old time

So love me hold me love me hold me
I'm free to do what i want any old time
I'm free any old time to get what I want
I'm free to do what i want any old time

So love me, hold me, love me, hold me
I'm free to sing my song knowing it's out of trend
I'm free any old time to get what i want
I'm free to sing my song knowing it's out of trend

So love me hold me love me hold me
I'm free to sing my song though it gets out of time
'Cause I'm free any old time to get what I want
I'm free to sing my song though it gets out of time

So love me, hold me, love me, hold me
So love me hold me love me hold me
And i'm free any old time to get what i want
I'm free any old time to get what I want


Love me, hold me, love me, hold me
I'm free to choose who I see any old time
But i'm free any old time to get what i want
I'm free to bring who I choose any old time

Love me hold me love me hold me
I'm free to choose what i please any old time
I'm free any old time to get what I want
I'm free to choose what i please any old time
So hold me, love me, love me, hold me
I'm free any old time to get what i want, yes i am


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 07:49:52 AM
I've been a busy girl this AM already bathed 5 dogs.  At least 3 more to do today, complete with pawdicures.  Brushing them is what takes forever, but I just can't bring myself to cut their beautiful long hair off.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 10, 2006, 07:56:28 AM
Thanks Peaches, and EVERYONE....

First thing he wanted when he got off the plane was ICE CREAM!

Thanks again to all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 10, 2006, 08:00:25 AM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Good Morning Monkeys

Was reading the Digicel comments & GSM questions, so did a little reading
Found this info:

http://www.digicelgroup.com/group/who_we_are.php
<snip>
As the largest GSM mobile operator in the region our plans are to extend our foothold into other Caribbean countries.

Thanks Yap.

Good Morning Everyone


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on July 10, 2006, 08:38:46 AM
I've been trying to catch up; I see monkeys have been at the phone calls again. Since reading Dave's book, I have been under the impression that none of the phone calls we've discussed amounted to anything concerning Natalee.

Here is a Front Page post; notice that it was posted last night. I don't know any more about "Richard" than what is stated:

Richard Says:
July 9th, 2006 at 8:42 pm
OK, I’ve gotten clarification on the phone calls. This comes from someone with whom
I “work” on the case, and who has direct ties with the family.

This person says she talked with Beth and Dave this week.

There were no phone calls from Natalee to anyone in the United States at this time.

Not Beth, Jug, Dave, or a Mountain Brook student.

No talk about “I don’t know these people.”

This report seems to be one of the persistent “Internet legends.”

< end post >

So. We're up to thread 400 something - and we don't even know whether calls from Natalee occurred?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on July 10, 2006, 08:39:01 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hope your week-end was a little more full of pleasent events. Third!  :wink:
I did do my Salsa Lesson Friday night. I'm having a blast with it.

This will give you an idea of how it's going......... :lol:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7836547273687836884


Hi CBB and all Good Morning !  :D  :)
  CBB I took Salsa Lessions  once  and didnt go back  the Chips were stale and they didnt warm them !
  :arrow:  " insert Laught track here "   :D
  Sorry  just couldnt resist  but seriousley CBB  have a great time  I also love to dance <g>
    Jerry


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 10, 2006, 08:40:31 AM
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/

Glad to hear the good news about Uncle Mike!   Give that man some ice cream.


Title: Sun freak your amazeing !
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on July 10, 2006, 08:47:12 AM
Sun freak I think your amazeing,  and a true classic.  Now not meaning that as an old Joke or anything  but just meant as a wonderful woman any way you slice it.and an animal lover to boot <g>
 Darn where were you 30 years ago. and now I am old and almost all used up . :D  




Quote from: "SunFreak2"
WAKE UP SLEEPY HEADS.....[/color]

IT'S A BEAUTIFUL MORNIN'  Ahhh
I think I'll go outside a while,
An jus' smile.
Just take in some clean fresh air, boy!
Ain't no sense in stayin' inside
If the weather's fine an' you got the time.
It's your chance to wake up and plan another brand new day.
Either way,
It's a beautiful mornin', Ahhh,
Each bird keeps singin' his own song.
So long!
I've got to be on my way, now.
Ain't no fun just hangin' around,
I've got to cover ground, you couldn't keep me down.
It just ain't no good if the sun shines
When you're still inside,
Shouldn't hide, still inside, shouldn't hide,
Ahhhh..Oh! (shouldn't hide) Ah, ah, Oh.....

(Do, do, Waaa) (Do, do, Waaa)

There will be children with robins and flowers;
Sunshine caresses each new waking hour.
Seems to me that the people keep seeing
More and more each day, gotta say, lead the way,
It's okay, wednesday, thursday, it's okay,
(Ahhh) monday, wednesday, friday, weekday, Ah, Ah, Ohhh.

(Do, do, Waaa)

Ah, Ah, Oh, Oh, (Do, Do - Aaaa)
Wooooo oo oo oh, oh, oh, Ah wo, do, waa
Ohhhhhhh.....Oh, Oh, Oh, .....
~~The Rascals~~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 08:50:07 AM
Good Morning All!

Breathe a sigh of relief that Uncle Mike is safe and sound!

Sad if it is true about the phone calls just being rumor!

Did everyone have a good weekend...with the exception of CBB - ick! Sewer Line!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 08:55:13 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
I've been trying to catch up; I see monkeys have been at the phone calls again. Since reading Dave's book, I have been under the impression that none of the phone calls we've discussed amounted to anything concerning Natalee.

Here is a Front Page post; notice that it was posted last night. I don't know any more about "Richard" than what is stated:

Richard Says:
July 9th, 2006 at 8:42 pm
OK, I’ve gotten clarification on the phone calls. This comes from someone with whom
I “work” on the case, and who has direct ties with the family.

This person says she talked with Beth and Dave this week.

There were no phone calls from Natalee to anyone in the United States at this time.

Not Beth, Jug, Dave, or a Mountain Brook student.

No talk about “I don’t know these people.”

This report seems to be one of the persistent “Internet legends.”

< end post >

So. We're up to thread 400 something - and we don't even know whether calls from Natalee occurred?


This is so frustrating.  Gunslinger says he has heard the tape of the call with the Monkey in the background and there is no doubt who is calling.  I wish there was someone who would come on the TV or radio  and separate the facts from the rumors.  It sure would help to know what to disallow in our theories.  I know that sounds selfish of me, as who am I to "demand" this.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 10, 2006, 08:56:39 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Since reading Dave's book, I have been under the impression that none of the phone calls we've discussed amounted to anything concerning Natalee.
Here is a Front Page post; notice that it was posted last night. I don't know any more about "Richard" than what is stated:
Richard Says:
July 9th, 2006 at 8:42 pm
OK, I’ve gotten clarification on the phone calls. This comes from someone with whom I “work” on the case, and who has direct ties with the family.  This person says she talked with Beth and Dave this week.
There were no phone calls from Natalee to anyone in the United States at this time.(?) Not Beth, Jug, Dave, or a Mountain Brook student.  No talk about “I don’t know these people.”   This report seems to be one of the persistent “Internet legends.”
< end post >
So. We're up to thread 400 something - and we don't even know whether calls from Natalee occurred?

Look at the source of this information.  Who is Richard and why is he posting on the front page and not in the forum?  We have a first hand report, from ala_Gunslinger, that he heard the tape of the phone call.


Title: Re: Sun freak your amazeing !
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 09:08:04 AM
Quote from: "Jerry from Ohio"
Sun freak I think your amazeing,  and a true classic.  Now not meaning that as an old Joke or anything  but just meant as a wonderful woman any way you slice it.and an animal lover to boot <g>
 Darn where were you 30 years ago. and now I am old and almost all used up . :D  


Ahhh, Jerry you are such a charmer. :::::blush:::::
I've been here in Georgia, where you been?  
I bet you still got plenty of living and giving still left in that ole body of yours.
 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 09:12:55 AM
I am listening to Dana's Podcast - Good questions re phone calls and ATM withdrawals.  Then a horrible rendition of the Star Spangled Banner - by the Charlie Daniels Band.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on July 10, 2006, 09:13:41 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Since reading Dave's book, I have been under the impression that none of the phone calls we've discussed amounted to anything concerning Natalee.
Here is a Front Page post; notice that it was posted last night. I don't know any more about "Richard" than what is stated:
Richard Says:
July 9th, 2006 at 8:42 pm
OK, I’ve gotten clarification on the phone calls. This comes from someone with whom I “work” on the case, and who has direct ties with the family.  This person says she talked with Beth and Dave this week.
There were no phone calls from Natalee to anyone in the United States at this time.(?) Not Beth, Jug, Dave, or a Mountain Brook student.  No talk about “I don’t know these people.”   This report seems to be one of the persistent “Internet legends.”
< end post >
So. We're up to thread 400 something - and we don't even know whether calls from Natalee occurred?

Look at the source of this information.  Who is Richard and why is he posting on the front page and not in the forum?  We have a first hand report, from ala_Gunslinger, that he heard the tape of the phone call.


I'll try to run this by gunslinger if I can catch him online.

As I said, I don't know anything about "Richard" other than what he states. (And I don't read the Front Page very often.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 10, 2006, 09:19:25 AM
Ms. Marple,
you miss out on quite a bit by not reading the front page...  :shock:  I don't always read the comments though....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 10, 2006, 09:19:42 AM
Oh and GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 09:22:44 AM
Morning Mrs. Red

Monday, Monday can't trust that day.............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 09:23:02 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Oh and GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!!


Good morning mrs. red.....and good morning friends....

Jacque.....prayers are really answered...!  I am so happy for Uncle Mike... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 09:25:04 AM
mrs. red.....I did order a cookbook through the paypal on the first page of the forum....says it goes to Tom....Thanks..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 10, 2006, 09:29:23 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
mrs. red.....I did order a cookbook through the paypal on the first page of the forum....says it goes to Tom....Thanks..... :)


thanks for letting me know MeMere, Can you email me your address?  I will get it out this afternoon....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 10, 2006, 09:30:57 AM
I have everyone's Caramel Macchiato nice and hot, I hope everyone has the same taste as me..  I also got some lemon pound cake with a light glaze to go along with the coffee..  GOOD MORNING flyingmermaid, Kimmy53, Leslie, MeMere, mrs. red and anyone else out there..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 10, 2006, 09:31:35 AM
I have enough cookbooks for the ones that ordered them... but please don't order anymore at this point y'all... I have to check with the printers to be sure I can get more than the 5 or so that were just ordered!


Thanks!!  If there is a huge interest, just email me....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 09:32:16 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "MeMere"
mrs. red.....I did order a cookbook through the paypal on the first page of the forum....says it goes to Tom....Thanks..... :)


thanks for letting me know MeMere, Can you email me your address?  I will get it out this afternoon....


Will do.... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mrs. red on July 10, 2006, 09:32:35 AM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I have everyone's Caramel Macchiato nice and hot, I hope everyone has the same taste as me..  I also got some lemon pound cake with a light glaze to go along with the coffee..  GOOD MORNING flyingmermaid, Kimmy53, Leslie, MeMere, mrs. red and anyone else out there..


Morning Terry...

thanks for the coffee i sure need it... but I am running outta here for the moment, I have to get to work.. bosses rolling in! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 10, 2006, 09:36:25 AM
Have a great day MrsRed, I actually got you some homemade chocolate chip cookies made with real butter wasn't sure you wanted the lemon pound cake..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 09:36:33 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
mrs. red.....I did order a cookbook through the paypal on the first page of the forum....says it goes to Tom....Thanks..... :)


Where MeMere?  I can't find it!  Please help me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 09:42:42 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "MeMere"
mrs. red.....I did order a cookbook through the paypal on the first page of the forum....says it goes to Tom....Thanks..... :)


Where MeMere?  I can't find it!  Please help me!


Mermaid....I am not sure that using the Paypal was correct....but it is on the "sm discussion forum forum index"...at the top..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 09:43:47 AM
Goodmorning All



SAN - are you here??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 09:49:08 AM
MeMere I posted the 7 layer Mexican Dip Recipe in the thread where the Runza's recipe is!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on July 10, 2006, 09:51:55 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!  Good to see you all on this Monday morning.  

Been reading back from yesterday - just realized the time and had to say "HI"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 10:00:01 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
MeMere I posted the 7 layer Mexican Dip Recipe in the thread where the Runza's recipe is!


Oh...thanks....going to get it now...!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 10:03:01 AM
Kimmy please go see the link CBB posted of her salsa lessons - I believe some of your talented relatives are featured and that you are also there doing your famous "Dancing with Myself"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 10:03:58 AM
(http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/US/07/10/building.collapse/story.nycbldgclps.02.wabc.jpg)
(http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2006/US/07/10/building.collapse/story.nycbldgclps.wabc.jpg)
NY building collapses and burns

Monday, July 10, 2006; Posted: 9:59 a.m. EDT (13:59 GMT)


NEW YORK (CNN) -- An explosion and fire leveled a residential building on New York's Upper East Side Monday morning, fire officials and eyewitnesses told CNN.

At least one person was transported to the hospital, New York firefighters told CNN personnel on the scene.

Ann McGovern, a neighbor across the street from the three-story E. 62nd Street location, told CNN she "witnessed two bloody people exiting the building just minutes after the explosion."

The New York Fire Department received a call reporting the explosion at 8:40 a.m., department spokeswoman Emily Rahimi said.

Smoke from the fire could be seen across Midtown and Manhattan's Upper East Side.

There were doctors' offices and residences in the building.

New York police were also on the scene.

CNN's Larry King was in a hotel nearby at the time of the explosion. He said it felt like an earthquake.

"I've never heard a sound like that," King said.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/10/building.collapse/index.html

THEY BELIEVE IT WAS A GAS EXPLOSION  - NOT TERRORISM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: MissinNat on July 10, 2006, 10:06:05 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All



SAN - are you here??


Good Morning Klass and All you monkeys out there!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on July 10, 2006, 10:20:04 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Kimmy please go see the link CBB posted of her salsa lessons - I believe some of your talented relatives are featured and that you are also there doing your famous "Dancing with Myself"


I will go back and find it.  I think it may be in the middle of this thread - isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 10:20:57 AM
This is what is confirmed about the phone call:

Was to voice mail of William Morris, FEB's bf
Had male voice saying "Are you calling home"
Occured sometime in early morning hours May 30

That's it.  Everything else is just rumor.  The "I don't know these people" rumor was first posted on SM last summer by "atypical", who claimed to be the friend of a parent of an MB kid on the trip who had heard the call.  I don't believe it's even been confirmed that the call was at 3:00 am, even tho that often gets stated as fact.

And I'm sorry, but some anonymous person on a message board saying "I've heard the call" doesn't count as confirmation with me.  And even if it is true that there is a female voice on the call saying "I don't know these people", clearly that caller has not been confirmed to have been Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 10:25:19 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
This is what is confirmed about the phone call:

Was to voice mail of William Morris, FEB's bf
Had male voice saying "Are you calling home"
Occured sometime in early morning hours May 30

That's it.  Everything else is just rumor.  The "I don't know these people" rumor was first posted on SM last summer by "atypical", who claimed to be the friend of a parent of an MB kid on the trip who had heard the call.  I don't believe it's even been confirmed that the call was at 3:00 am, even tho that often gets stated as fact.

And I'm sorry, but some anonymous person on a message board saying "I've heard the call" doesn't count as confirmation with me.  And even if it is true that there is a female voice on the call saying "I don't know these people", clearly that caller has not been confirmed to have been Natalee.


Thanks Shizaru - so not even the time is confirmed?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 10:37:07 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
This is what is confirmed about the phone call:

Was to voice mail of William Morris, FEB's bf
Had male voice saying "Are you calling home"
Occured sometime in early morning hours May 30

That's it.  Everything else is just rumor.  The "I don't know these people" rumor was first posted on SM last summer by "atypical", who claimed to be the friend of a parent of an MB kid on the trip who had heard the call.  I don't believe it's even been confirmed that the call was at 3:00 am, even tho that often gets stated as fact.

And I'm sorry, but some anonymous person on a message board saying "I've heard the call" doesn't count as confirmation with me.  And even if it is true that there is a female voice on the call saying "I don't know these people", clearly that caller has not been confirmed to have been Natalee.


Thanks Shizaru - so not even the time is confirmed?


No, I'm pretty sure it isn't.  I don't think there's ever been any specific time reported for the call, the most specific report I was able to find was in the NE, which IIRC said the call was sometime between 1:00 am and 5:00 am.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 10:38:29 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
This is what is confirmed about the phone call:

Was to voice mail of William Morris, FEB's bf
Had male voice saying "Are you calling home"
Occured sometime in early morning hours May 30

That's it.  Everything else is just rumor.  The "I don't know these people" rumor was first posted on SM last summer by "atypical", who claimed to be the friend of a parent of an MB kid on the trip who had heard the call.  I don't believe it's even been confirmed that the call was at 3:00 am, even tho that often gets stated as fact.

And I'm sorry, but some anonymous person on a message board saying "I've heard the call" doesn't count as confirmation with me.  And even if it is true that there is a female voice on the call saying "I don't know these people", clearly that caller has not been confirmed to have been Natalee.


Thanks Shizaru - so not even the time is confirmed?


....but, how do we know that this information is "confirmed"....Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 10:39:08 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Kimmy please go see the link CBB posted of her salsa lessons - I believe some of your talented relatives are featured and that you are also there doing your famous "Dancing with Myself"


I will go back and find it.  I think it may be in the middle of this thread - isn't it?


PG 37


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 10:41:05 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
This is what is confirmed about the phone call:

Was to voice mail of William Morris, FEB's bf
Had male voice saying "Are you calling home"
Occured sometime in early morning hours May 30

That's it.  Everything else is just rumor.  The "I don't know these people" rumor was first posted on SM last summer by "atypical", who claimed to be the friend of a parent of an MB kid on the trip who had heard the call.  I don't believe it's even been confirmed that the call was at 3:00 am, even tho that often gets stated as fact.

And I'm sorry, but some anonymous person on a message board saying "I've heard the call" doesn't count as confirmation with me.  And even if it is true that there is a female voice on the call saying "I don't know these people", clearly that caller has not been confirmed to have been Natalee.


Thanks Shizaru - so not even the time is confirmed?


No, I'm pretty sure it isn't.  I don't think there's ever been any specific time reported for the call, the most specific report I was able to find was in the NE, which IIRC said the call was sometime between 1:00 am and 5:00 am.


ETA: I remember that Beth once said on Greta that she "knew" Natalee had been in the VDS home at 3:00, and then people immediately started speculating she knew that because of the phone call, then shortly after that people started saying that Beth had actually said she knew it because of the phone call, but she never did, she could have just meant she knew it based on gut feeling.  I think that is where the idea that the call was at 3:00 came from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 10:43:00 AM
Thanks Shizaru - alot of speculation and timelines based on 3am so it's good to know not confirmed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 10, 2006, 10:44:26 AM
Just a quick semi-off topic question. I understand the board is not quite up to par yet -- but why would it be that at my work, I stay "logged-in" on this forum board and at home, I get "logged-out" after about 2 hours. I have my cookies enabled the same at both (I think). Any ideas? Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: msmarple on July 10, 2006, 10:44:56 AM
Thanks Shizaru.

Did William Morris make the trip to Aruba, or was he in Mountain Brook?

Is this the "Charles Croes" call?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 10:46:54 AM
Quote from: "wreck"
Just a quick semi-off topic question. I understand the board is not quite up to par yet -- but why would it be that at my work, I stay "logged-in" on this forum board and at home, I get "logged-out" after about 2 hours. I have my cookies enabled the same at both (I think). Any ideas? Thanks!


cookies


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 10, 2006, 10:47:34 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thanks Shizaru.

Did William Morris make the trip to Aruba, or was he in Mountain Brook?

Is this the "Charles Croes" call?

It was my understanding that he was on the trip and discovered the message when he was playing back messages when he was at the airport waiting to leave Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on July 10, 2006, 10:50:24 AM
Quote from: "Jerry from Ohio"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hope your week-end was a little more full of pleasent events. Third!  :wink:
I did do my Salsa Lesson Friday night. I'm having a blast with it.

This will give you an idea of how it's going......... :lol:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7836547273687836884


Hi CBB and all Good Morning !  :D  :)
  CBB I took Salsa Lessions  once  and didnt go back  the Chips were stale and they didnt warm them !
  :arrow:  " insert Laught track here "   :D
  Sorry  just couldnt resist  but seriousley CBB  have a great time  I also love to dance <g>
    Jerry


 :lol: Jerry, I'm trying to catch up,,,,,,,,,You can use my laugh for a track, 'cause I just had a good one! Thanks, and morning monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 10:50:48 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thanks Shizaru.

Did William Morris make the trip to Aruba, or was he in Mountain Brook?

Is this the "Charles Croes" call?


Morris was on the trip, and yes that is the C. Croes call.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Mere on July 10, 2006, 10:52:09 AM
Quote from: "wreck"
Just a quick semi-off topic question. I understand the board is not quite up to par yet -- but why would it be that at my work, I stay "logged-in" on this forum board and at home, I get "logged-out" after about 2 hours. I have my cookies enabled the same at both (I think). Any ideas? Thanks!


Hi wreck....I had to clear everything ....cookies and temp. internet files... and re-boot this morning in order to stay on....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on July 10, 2006, 11:04:22 AM
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 10, 2006, 11:06:40 AM
Morning monkeys...Just wanted to know if you'd seen this article about a Philly psychic:

http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/15003846.htm

She claims she knows what happened to Jon Benet, Natalee, and others...

"Holloway was killed and thrown from a boat when she fought back against men who abducted her to sell her into sex slavery"

That's a theory we haven't explored...but does sound a little strange...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: mishy on July 10, 2006, 11:07:13 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:07:50 AM
I can't translate this article, but it "looks" like a helicopter may have gone down in the ocean in Aruba:

http://www.diarioaruba.com/dialuna/local/news1.html

(http://www.diarioaruba.com/dialuna/local/mancha%20lama.2.jpg)
(http://www.diarioaruba.com/dialuna/local/mancha%20lama.1.jpg)

   Park rangernan a topa cune…. MANCHA DI AZETA NA BOCA DI BRAZA DEN VADER PIET

ORANJESTAD(AAN):Diadomingo den oranan di merdia park rangernan di parke nacional Arikok durante nan patruya banda di costanan panort di Aruba a bin topa cu un mancha di azeta cu tabata dal den baranca.

Aki ta trata di un un mancha di azeta cu a yega na Boca Braza cu ta keda den vecindario di Vaderpiet.

Mirando e situación a haci cu mesora hefenan di Park Rangernan a wordo notifica y a notifica tambe Bibi Arends di departamento di desaster.

Nan tur a presenta na e sitio y mescos a notifica helicopter cu a bay mira te na unda e mancha di azeta aki ta yega.

Mirando cu e situación no tabata asina serio no tabata tin motibo pa bay den accion.

Asina mes a pidi e helicopter pa haci un recorido full na e costa panort pa mira te unda e mancha di azeta ta yega.Tambe na e costa pazuid unda e beachnan blanco ta.

E costanan pazuid di nos isla ta algo cu mester ser cuida masha hopi mes pasobra ta un di e atraccionnan mas grandi di nos turistanan na Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:10:38 AM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


No, I don't remember that but I can do a search of his posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:17:30 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


No, I don't remember that but I can do a search of his posts.


Sunfreak - I don't see a post where Gunslinger said he heard the call.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 11:28:54 AM
I haven't seen Gunslinger here in a long time!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:29:59 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I haven't seen Gunslinger here in a long time!

He was here alot on Saturday


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 11:30:36 AM
Didn' alot of people Chalres Croes included listen to the call on Beth's phone when they were outside the VDS residence?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:31:31 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Didn' alot of people Chalres Croes included listen to the call on Beth's phone when they were outside the VDS residence?

I don't think they listened to it outside the VDS residence, I think it was when Beth first met with C Croes.  I could be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 11:31:39 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I haven't seen Gunslinger here in a long time!

He was here alot on Saturday


I was recuperating on Saturday - Big party Fri Night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:33:50 AM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I haven't seen Gunslinger here in a long time!

He was here alot on Saturday


I was recuperating on Saturday - Big party Fri Night!


Hope you had a great time!  Was the party at your house?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: BTgirl on July 10, 2006, 11:36:51 AM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


Good morning monkeys.

Is this what you're looking for?


Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:27 pm    Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Tylergal wrote:
ala_gunslinger wrote:
Anna wrote:
Shizaru wrote:
[I do not believe Beth ever confirmed a female caller saying "I don't know these people".


GUNSLINGER

Do you have any recollection on whether or not this has been established as a fact?


Sadley enough, I heard the call.

It has been established!


That's good enough for me. My friend, AlaGS said that weeks ago. He don't mess around.
 


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 11:38:21 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
I haven't seen Gunslinger here in a long time!

He was here alot on Saturday


I was recuperating on Saturday - Big party Fri Night!


Hope you had a great time!  Was the party at your house?


Neighbors son joined the Marines left this morning they had casino night, Wings and Subs, Keg and UMMMMMMMMM Dancers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: AZSunny on July 10, 2006, 11:42:33 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


No, I don't remember that but I can do a search of his posts.


Sunfreak - I don't see a post where Gunslinger said he heard the call.


He did say that on Saturday, but I am not sure if he heard the actual call.  He later said it had been on television.  I think he meant he 'heard' of the call, not "heard the call"  I believe that is correct


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 11:46:13 AM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


No, I don't remember that but I can do a search of his posts.


Sunfreak - I don't see a post where Gunslinger said he heard the call.


He did say that on Saturday, but I am not sure if he heard the actual call.  He later said it had been on television.  I think he meant he 'heard' of the call, not "heard the call"  I believe that is correct


I don't remember if that was the same poster, but I was told by someone that they did, in fact, actually hear the call...

BTW...Good morning everyone!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on July 10, 2006, 11:47:47 AM
Well, off to the dentist.... Good ole check-up time.  Be back shortly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 11:48:00 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


No, I don't remember that but I can do a search of his posts.


Sunfreak - I don't see a post where Gunslinger said he heard the call.


He did say it, but he put the response inside someone else's quote:

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:27 pm    Post subject:

Sadley enough, I heard the call.

It has been established!

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=8481&highlight=#8481



Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:34 pm

Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=8493&highlight=#8493

Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:40 pm
 
Third, I am sorry you don't believe me. But I heard it. Believe what you want. That is you're right.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=8499&highlight=#8499


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:48:18 AM
Gunslinger did say it.  He made it very clear that he heard it:

Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.



Gunslinger went on to say that you wouldn't need voice analysis to know it was Natalee's voice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:49:36 AM
Gunslinger did say he heard the call.  What was throwing me off was Saturday, the discussion was on Wednesday the 5th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 11:49:46 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say it.  He made it very clear that he heard it:

Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.



Gunslinger went on to say that you wouldn't need voice analysis to know it was Natalee's voice.


Beat you by a few seconds :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 11:50:37 AM
This was all I found quickly....certainly reads as though he actually heard the message:

ala_gunslinger
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Location: Southern by birth, in Alabama by the Grace of God.
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:26 pm    

   Anna wrote:
      Shizaru wrote:
      [I do not believe Beth ever confirmed a female caller saying "I       don't know these people".


   GUNSLINGER

   Do you have any recollection on whether or not this has been established    as a fact?


.
Sadley enough, I heard the call.

It has been established!

============

ala_gunslinger
Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Location: Southern by birth, in Alabama by the Grace of God.
   
PostPosted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:34 pm    

   Anna wrote:
   GUNSLINGER,
   We are trying today to make a case for charges of kidnapping/abduction    something less than murder that could be proven. We need something    concrete like that for proof Natalee was held against her will.

.


Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 11:51:33 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say it.  He made it very clear that he heard it:

Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.



Gunslinger went on to say that you wouldn't need voice analysis to know it was Natalee's voice.


Ok then.  I understand the way these things "take off", so I am going to continue to be skeptical regading the existence of this alleged phone call.  Because, if you ask me, there would have been MUCH more made of it if it had been discovered to be legitimate.  And, no matter what anyone says, a voice analysis test would have to be done to even attempt to authenticate.  Just my opinion, of course...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 11:51:49 AM
Well, we ALL found it!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 11:52:25 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say it.  He made it very clear that he heard it:

Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.



Gunslinger went on to say that you wouldn't need voice analysis to know it was Natalee's voice.


Cool.....so, I have another question that may be just a 'rumor' (I hate rumors, grrr). Has it been confirmed that "I don't know these people" was a code between Nat and family in the event that she should ever be in a bad situation...such as a kidnapping???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 11:54:16 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say he heard the call.  What was throwing me off was Saturday, the discussion was on Wednesday the 5th.


Yeah, but if I remember corerctly, this poster did tell me that he heard it on "Greta's show" early on.  Now, I've been following this case since the beginning, and I never heard such a call on Greta.  That leads me to believe he heard of it's possible existence on Greta's show.  But, I'm probably wrong again anyway.  When am I going to learn??  ;)

BTW Klass...you ever get the chance to shoot Houdini my email?  He was asking for it late last week...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:54:35 AM
What I want to know is if Gunslinger heard the call what is the verified time of the call??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 11:55:25 AM
THIRD, nothing wrong with skepticism, all things considered.  BUT, if the call does exist on William's phone, I've no doubt the FBI has analyzed it because the recording on his phone is/was physically in the US.  As for "low publicity" factor and again IF the call exists, there may be good reasons for keeping it in the "mystery zone."

Bottom line, I'd guess those who need to know, know; the rest of us can only guess, assume, hope.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:55:34 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say he heard the call.  What was throwing me off was Saturday, the discussion was on Wednesday the 5th.


Yeah, but if I remember corerctly, this poster did tell me that he heard it on "Greta's show" early on.  Now, I've been following this case since the beginning, and I never heard such a call on Greta.  That leads me to believe he heard of it's possible existence on Greta's show.  But, I'm probably wrong again anyway.  When am I going to learn??  ;)

BTW Klass...you ever get the chance to shoot Houdini my email?  He was asking for it late last week...


I could but why doesn't he simply email you through your profile??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 11:56:00 AM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say it.  He made it very clear that he heard it:

Yes, the phone call consisted of the following....

"I don't know these people!" (you could hear the terror in her voice)

followed by a male voice

"Who are you calling?" "You're parents?"

then the call disconnects.



Gunslinger went on to say that you wouldn't need voice analysis to know it was Natalee's voice.


Cool.....so, I have another question that may be just a 'rumor' (I hate rumors, grrr). Has it been confirmed that "I don't know these people" was a code between Nat and family in the event that she should ever be in a bad situation...such as a kidnapping???


But wait, didn't I read on an earlier page (on this thread) that someone close to the family put this phone call theory to bed by saying it was only rumor?  I think it was by way of a front page post (IIRC)...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 11:56:43 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say he heard the call.  What was throwing me off was Saturday, the discussion was on Wednesday the 5th.


Yeah, but if I remember corerctly, this poster did tell me that he heard it on "Greta's show" early on.  Now, I've been following this case since the beginning, and I never heard such a call on Greta.  That leads me to believe he heard of it's possible existence on Greta's show.  But, I'm probably wrong again anyway.  When am I going to learn??  ;)

BTW Klass...you ever get the chance to shoot Houdini my email?  He was asking for it late last week...


I could but why doesn't he simply email you through your profile??


Well, because I choose not to include my email in my profile...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 11:58:44 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"


But wait, didn't I read on an earlier page (on this thread) that someone close to the family put this phone call theory to bed by saying it was only rumor?  I think it was by way of a front page post (IIRC)...


I believe that was in re the October call and not the call to William's phone?  Anyway...my recollection, at least.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 11:59:05 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say he heard the call.  What was throwing me off was Saturday, the discussion was on Wednesday the 5th.


Yeah, but if I remember corerctly, this poster did tell me that he heard it on "Greta's show" early on.  Now, I've been following this case since the beginning, and I never heard such a call on Greta.  That leads me to believe he heard of it's possible existence on Greta's show.  But, I'm probably wrong again anyway.  When am I going to learn??  ;)

BTW Klass...you ever get the chance to shoot Houdini my email?  He was asking for it late last week...


I could but why doesn't he simply email you through your profile??


Well, because I choose not to include my email in my profile...;)


When I click on your profile I see an email button but maybe it's something to do with my abilities as a Mod..I don't know


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 11:59:28 AM
Quote from: "Tess LaCoyle"
THIRD, nothing wrong with skepticism, all things considered.  BUT, if the call does exist on William's phone, I've no doubt the FBI has analyzed it because the recording on his phone is/was physically in the US.  As for "low publicity" factor and again IF the call exists, there may be good reasons for keeping it in the "mystery zone."

Bottom line, I'd guess those who need to know, know; the rest of us can only guess, assume, hope.


I agree with you Tess.  I do think that if the phone call exists, it would have been analyzed a LONG time ago.  Only thing that would bother me about your other point is...if it is being kept under wraps in the "mystery zone" as you say, how could a poster on a message board have heard it?  Just something to think about...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 12:00:14 PM
Quote from: "Tess LaCoyle"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"


But wait, didn't I read on an earlier page (on this thread) that someone close to the family put this phone call theory to bed by saying it was only rumor?  I think it was by way of a front page post (IIRC)...


I believe that was in re the October call and not the call to William's phone?  Anyway...my recollection, at least.


Just realized you may be remembering the "Richard" post from front page....don't know Richard, so have no way of assessing credibility.  Sigh....a fact of the net.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:01:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger did say he heard the call.  What was throwing me off was Saturday, the discussion was on Wednesday the 5th.


Yeah, but if I remember corerctly, this poster did tell me that he heard it on "Greta's show" early on.  Now, I've been following this case since the beginning, and I never heard such a call on Greta.  That leads me to believe he heard of it's possible existence on Greta's show.  But, I'm probably wrong again anyway.  When am I going to learn??  ;)

BTW Klass...you ever get the chance to shoot Houdini my email?  He was asking for it late last week...


I could but why doesn't he simply email you through your profile??


Well, because I choose not to include my email in my profile...;)


When I click on your profile I see an email button but maybe it's something to do with my abilities as a Mod..I don't know


Yeah, because when I click on it, there's no email option.  If it's a problem, don't worry about it.  I'll hook up w/Houdini some other way...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 12:02:37 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Tess LaCoyle"
THIRD, nothing wrong with skepticism, all things considered.  BUT, if the call does exist on William's phone, I've no doubt the FBI has analyzed it because the recording on his phone is/was physically in the US.  As for "low publicity" factor and again IF the call exists, there may be good reasons for keeping it in the "mystery zone."

Bottom line, I'd guess those who need to know, know; the rest of us can only guess, assume, hope.


I agree with you Tess.  I do think that if the phone call exists, it would have been analyzed a LONG time ago.  Only thing that would bother me about your other point is...if it is being kept under wraps in the "mystery zone" as you say, how could a poster on a message board have heard it?  Just something to think about...


The only reason I can come up with would be that the call was heard early in the case, before any legal maneuverings which might exist or be planned today were formulated.    In that case, I'd then assume (ouch!) perhaps the person who heard the call early in the case is not involved or aware of today's plans, etc.   Who knows....I can only guess.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:03:08 PM
Thirdstrike - not a problem, I was just confused.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Susebear on July 10, 2006, 12:04:01 PM
Good morning Monkey friends.  
This morning I had a spam email for a survey that caught my eye.  " Email Survey from the Makers of Dove and Lipton"  I completed the survey noting that I do not buy ANY Unilever products, then followed up with an email to the survey link telling them why I'm boycotting, and urge you all to go to the link, choose the "contact us" button and email them and tell them if you are boycotting Dutch products until they do something about the abysmal way the Natalee Holloway investigation has been conducted.  It is one of the only ways we can help, with our dollars.  DO NOT BUY DUTCH or travel to FUBARUBA.  
http://www.shoppers-voice.com/en/index.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:04:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thirdstrike - not a problem, I was just confused.


Thank you Klass!!  As usual, you are a Stallion amongst Mules.  Well, I don't mmean that literally of course.  It's actually a compliment.  OK, sorry...it's Monday!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tess LaCoyle on July 10, 2006, 12:05:18 PM
Gotta run get ready for a 1:00 appointment.....y'all have a great afternoon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:06:18 PM
Quote from: "Tess LaCoyle"
Gotta run get ready for a 1:00 appointment.....y'all have a great afternoon!


You too Tess!  It's been a pleasure speaking with you.  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 12:09:28 PM
My receptionist just walked in hysterical crying with her Fiance and told me just got a call that her Mom died.  She was having an angioplasty and went into coronary!  She was going to pick her up before coming to work.  Poor little thing is hysterical and Boss is in Helsinki - Urghhhhhhh!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 12:12:16 PM
Sent her home to go make her arrangements, called boss in Europe, going to lunch..............................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 12:12:57 PM
Later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:15:27 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
My receptionist just walked in hysterical crying with her Fiance and told me just got a call that her Mom died.  She was having an angioplasty and went into coronary!  She was going to pick her up before coming to work.  Poor little thing is hysterical and Boss is in Helsinki - Urghhhhhhh!


That's horrible!  I'll include her in my thoughts today...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:20:01 PM
Damn...where'd everybody go?  Is my breath stinkin'??   :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 12:26:02 PM
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Susebear on July 10, 2006, 12:26:17 PM
ummmmm we are the only ones here right now TS.  And, Klaas, of course,  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on July 10, 2006, 12:32:29 PM
And what am I???  Chopped fruit?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:35:41 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
And what am I???  Chopped fruit?


Of course not!  You're a BEAUTIFUL fruit platter Peaches!!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 12:37:34 PM
.
The phone calls are now so hopelessly scrambled together that I don't think anybody knows which is which any more.  I thought the one to the MB kid was to one who did not go on the trip, the one CCroes called and talked to for 45 minutes.

None of the accounts I hear now are as I remember from the early days.  Don't think the family wants it straightened out and does prefer it remain in the mystery zone so we have no way to verify now.  Going back to the beginning and trying to find posts has become just about impossible.

Think I will just file the calls under Can of Worms and leave it there.  But it has become totally twisted from what was at the beginning and now I don't know what to think about them.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:39:30 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
The phone calls are now so hopelessly scrambled together that I don't think anybody knows which is which any more.  I thought the one to the MB kid was to one who did not go on the trip, the one CCroes called and talked to for 45 minutes.

None of the accounts I hear now are as I remember from the early days.  Don't think the family wants it straightened out and does prefer it remain in the mystery zone so we have no way to verify now.  Going back to the beginning and trying to find posts has become just about impossible.

Think I will just file the calls under Can of Worms and leave it there.  But it has become totally twisted from what was at the beginning and now I don't know what to think about them.

.


Anna - Gunslinger indicated that he had heard the call.  I don't know if what he meant by that was in person (family friend) or on Greta.  I want to find out what Gunslinger meant.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sharon on July 10, 2006, 12:39:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
What I want to know is if Gunslinger heard the call what is the verified time of the call??


Klaasend -- just a quick drive by while everyone thinks I'm in the loo :D

I remember 'Dash' said she heard the call last summer from the cell phone directly. IIRC -- she said she didn't think it was Natalee, but others did. I don't remember is she stated the time -- or what was said. Or if you can even retrieve any of her posts.

Or maybe I dreamed the whole thing 8) (jk -- I may forget details, but my memory is pretty good)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 12:41:11 PM
.
Susebear,
I keep getting all sorts of email from those products, too, offers of free samples, and one even from Phillips Products soliciting me to purchase their electronics.  I never received them before so must conclude this is some sort of massive PR campaign by the Dutch to promote their products.  I also send Breck Bulbs my reason for not purchasing for the first time in probably fifteen years.

Maybe they will eventually get the message?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 10, 2006, 12:42:15 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


I dunno where you heard that BUT, voice analysis is VERY reliable, you can take it to the bank.  I know this because I have done some work in the voice recognition field.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:44:25 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "klaasend"
What I want to know is if Gunslinger heard the call what is the verified time of the call??


Klaasend -- just a quick drive by while everyone thinks I'm in the loo :D

I remember 'Dash' said she heard the call last summer from the cell phone directly. IIRC -- she said she didn't think it was Natalee, but others did. I don't remember is she stated the time -- or what was said. Or if you can even retrieve any of her posts.

Or maybe I dreamed the whole thing 8) (jk -- I may forget details, but my memory is pretty good)

I remember Dash's conversations about it and she did listed to the call on the bus ride home.

I want to know if Gunslinger has listened to the call.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: sharon on July 10, 2006, 12:45:16 PM
Sorry Shizaru -- I see I posted the same info about Dash. I hadn't read your comment yet. The embarrassing moments from being pages behind and only having time for the drive by. Sorry :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 12:45:32 PM
.Voice analysis has made tremendous strides in recent years because of
the need for recognition in the War on Terror of whether it is in fact certain terrorists.  They can do much more than just a few short years ago.  High price for progress, huh?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 10, 2006, 12:46:26 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


I dunno where you heard that BUT, voice analysis is VERY reliable, you can take it to the bank.  I know this because I have done some work in the voice recognition field.


woops i didnt finish what i was saying.  You do not even need the person to speak the same words.  In alot of cases, all you need is about the first 20 milliseconds of the start of a word at the start of a sentence.  This portion of human speech is most consistent (such as during a phone call, when you answer the phone and say "hello" - the 1st 20 milliseconds of the word hello would be all you need to compare to a known sample of the persons voice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 10, 2006, 12:47:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All


SAN - are you here??

I am here now. :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 12:47:26 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
The phone calls are now so hopelessly scrambled together that I don't think anybody knows which is which any more.  I thought the one to the MB kid was to one who did not go on the trip, the one CCroes called and talked to for 45 minutes.

None of the accounts I hear now are as I remember from the early days.  Don't think the family wants it straightened out and does prefer it remain in the mystery zone so we have no way to verify now.  Going back to the beginning and trying to find posts has become just about impossible.

Think I will just file the calls under Can of Worms and leave it there.  But it has become totally twisted from what was at the beginning and now I don't know what to think about them.

.


Dang Anna...I guess this time, we actually will agree to agree!!  ;)  I too think that as time passes, and frustrations continue to mount, facts become just a little more "intense" then they originally were.  Then, pople comment on them, and they suddenly replace the facts that were relied on earlier.  It's a progressive cycle...

BTW, how was your weekend?  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on July 10, 2006, 12:47:31 PM
Thank you, Thirdsy.   Took me until almost noon to get caught up!  My monitor bought the farm last week and I didn't get a different one until Sunday afternoon.  Well, then daughter snagged the computer anyway.  Interesting stuff discussed recently.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:49:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All


SAN - are you here??

I am here now. :)

I'm so relieved!  There was a building that exploded in Manhatten today.  It held a DR's office and of course I immediately worried about you!  My husband tells me I worry too much, LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Frijole on July 10, 2006, 12:54:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All


SAN - are you here??

I am here now. :)

I'm so relieved!  There was a building that exploded in Manhatten today.  It held a DR's office and of course I immediately worried about you!  My husband tells me I worry too much, LOL  :lol:


You aren't alone!  I thought of San first thing this a.m. when I heard it too!  Glad you are well our little buddy.   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 10, 2006, 12:55:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All


SAN - are you here??

I am here now. :)

I'm so relieved!  There was a building that exploded in Manhatten today.  It held a DR's office and of course I immediately worried about you!  My husband tells me I worry too much, LOL  :lol:

They said on the news that it may have been a suicide attempt by the doctor in that office.

Thanks Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 12:56:58 PM
San - Then of course, the voice of reason (Red) explained to me that NY is a big place, LOLOLOL  :lol:  and that you were probably no where near it! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 12:57:08 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
This is what is confirmed about the phone call:

Was to voice mail of William Morris, FEB's bf
Had male voice saying "Are you calling home"
Occured sometime in early morning hours May 30

That's it.  Everything else is just rumor.  The "I don't know these people" rumor was first posted on SM last summer by "atypical", who claimed to be the friend of a parent of an MB kid on the trip who had heard the call.  I don't believe it's even been confirmed that the call was at 3:00 am, even tho that often gets stated as fact.

And I'm sorry, but some anonymous person on a message board saying "I've heard the call" doesn't count as confirmation with me.  And even if it is true that there is a female voice on the call saying "I don't know these people", clearly that caller has not been confirmed to have been Natalee.


Thanks Shizaru - so not even the time is confirmed?


No, I'm pretty sure it isn't.  I don't think there's ever been any specific time reported for the call, the most specific report I was able to find was in the NE, which IIRC said the call was sometime between 1:00 am and 5:00 am.


ETA: I remember that Beth once said on Greta that she "knew" Natalee had been in the VDS home at 3:00, and then people immediately started speculating she knew that because of the phone call, then shortly after that people started saying that Beth had actually said she knew it because of the phone call, but she never did, she could have just meant she knew it based on gut feeling.  I think that is where the idea that the call was at 3:00 came from.


I heard the phone call discussed before Beth went to the Sloot house.  When Beth told Greta she knew now that Natalee was here, I immediately became suspicious that Beth had heard some kind of sound in the phone call equal to what she had heard in the house, perhaps a clock striking, etc.  I believed it was a clock striking because the time was said to be 3 a.m.  The phone call was discussed on TV within a few hours of Natalee going missing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: San on July 10, 2006, 12:57:46 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"

You aren't alone!  I thought of San first thing this a.m. when I heard it too!  Glad you are well our little buddy.   :)

Thanks Frijole.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 12:59:22 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
The phone calls are now so hopelessly scrambled together that I don't think anybody knows which is which any more.  I thought the one to the MB kid was to one who did not go on the trip, the one CCroes called and talked to for 45 minutes.


My understanding is that when Beth arrived she played the call to Morris' voice mail for Croes, and then Croes called Morris and spoke to him for 45 minutes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:00:18 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Just a quick semi-off topic question. I understand the board is not quite up to par yet -- but why would it be that at my work, I stay "logged-in" on this forum board and at home, I get "logged-out" after about 2 hours. I have my cookies enabled the same at both (I think). Any ideas? Thanks!


I have the same thing, depends on which computer I am on at my house (since we have five, some for business and for pleasure), and another thing that is wonky for me.  I accidentally put a monkey on "block messenger" when I meant to put someone else on "block messenger," the person above it who was sending me a virus.  I realized what I had done and blocked the virus person (from the Netherlands) and then went to unblock the monkey.  I can get the monkey mail on three computers but that person remains blocked on 2.  I have even tried powering down after removing the "block this messenger" in order to make that work and alas, after 3-4 days it is blocking again.  Can we just say "Technology is not where it will be in another 25 years."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:01:22 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thanks Shizaru.

Did William Morris make the trip to Aruba, or was he in Mountain Brook?

Is this the "Charles Croes" call?

It was my understanding that he was on the trip and discovered the message when he was playing back messages when he was at the airport waiting to leave Aruba.


On the bus going to Birmigham after leaving Atl International.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 01:05:31 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
The phone calls are now so hopelessly scrambled together that I don't think anybody knows which is which any more.  I thought the one to the MB kid was to one who did not go on the trip, the one CCroes called and talked to for 45 minutes.


My understanding is that when Beth arrived she played the call to Morris' voice mail for Croes, and then Croes called Morris and spoke to him for 45 minutes.


To be clear. Morris was o the trip, but had returned to MB by the time Croes called him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 01:07:04 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


I dunno where you heard that BUT, voice analysis is VERY reliable, you can take it to the bank.  I know this because I have done some work in the voice recognition field.


woops i didnt finish what i was saying.  You do not even need the person to speak the same words.  In alot of cases, all you need is about the first 20 milliseconds of the start of a word at the start of a sentence.  This portion of human speech is most consistent (such as during a phone call, when you answer the phone and say "hello" - the 1st 20 milliseconds of the word hello would be all you need to compare to a known sample of the persons voice.


In that case if there is a female voice on the call the FBI must have determined that it was not Natalee.

Croes did say in his e-mail the call had been determined not to be from Natalee but he did not say how or if it was known who it was actually from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:09:46 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Does anyone remember GunSlinger posting (yesterday or Saturday I believe) that he had heard the call from Natalee that night?  Did he give a time on the call?


Would love to hear more about this if GunSlinger did indeed hear this call...


No, I don't remember that but I can do a search of his posts.


Sunfreak - I don't see a post where Gunslinger said he heard the call.


He did say that on Saturday, but I am not sure if he heard the actual call.  He later said it had been on television.  I think he meant he 'heard' of the call, not "heard the call"  I believe that is correct


Go back a few posts from my response, perhaps even a couple days before where he stated he had heard the call and it was Natalee's voice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 01:10:42 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


I dunno where you heard that BUT, voice analysis is VERY reliable, you can take it to the bank.  I know this because I have done some work in the voice recognition field.


woops i didnt finish what i was saying.  You do not even need the person to speak the same words.  In alot of cases, all you need is about the first 20 milliseconds of the start of a word at the start of a sentence.  This portion of human speech is most consistent (such as during a phone call, when you answer the phone and say "hello" - the 1st 20 milliseconds of the word hello would be all you need to compare to a known sample of the persons voice.


In that case if there is a female voice on the call the FBI must have determined that it was not Natalee.

Croes did say in his e-mail the call had been determined not to be from Natalee but he did not say how or if it was known who it was actually from.


Ok, so have we now confirmed the call was not from Natalee?  That would be a shock to many hear, because there are quite a few that swear by it to the point that it has now become as "factual" as Joran and the K2's being the last person seen with her...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:14:07 PM
Shizaru - with all due respect, I will wait for confirmation of the phone call from someone other than Charles Croes.  

Gunslinger says he heard the call.  I want to know how or where he heard the call.  Gunslinger said it definately was Natalee's voice and that you would not need any special voice recognition to realize that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jerry from Ohio on July 10, 2006, 01:16:03 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Later!


 AWE FM  that is truly sad and if I may I will send up smoke tonite for her and her family  if ya can please post her first name if your ok with that  if not the great father will already know who she is .
  May you also find strength in dealing with the situation ,
   Jerry from Ohio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:16:06 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


Well, we are mixing oranges and apples here.  There was a call to William Norris and a call to the residence, which Jug did not answer and it went to voice mail, the call that Beth asked the state trooper to listen to when she was stopped doing 100 miles per hour and the state trooper escorted her and made sure she was save from Arkansas to Alabama on May 30.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:19:30 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Susebear,
I keep getting all sorts of email from those products, too, offers of free samples, and one even from Phillips Products soliciting me to purchase their electronics.  I never received them before so must conclude this is some sort of massive PR campaign by the Dutch to promote their products.  I also send Breck Bulbs my reason for not purchasing for the first time in probably fifteen years.

Maybe they will eventually get the message?

.


Unfortunately Philips is about to take over the medical industry as far as technology goes.  Next time you are in a hopsital, look for the trademark on everything.  Of course, they have many different names under their umbrella, so you might not know it to be Philips, but it is as pervasive as E. coli in the drains.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on July 10, 2006, 01:21:19 PM
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:21:53 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


I dunno where you heard that BUT, voice analysis is VERY reliable, you can take it to the bank.  I know this because I have done some work in the voice recognition field.


woops i didnt finish what i was saying.  You do not even need the person to speak the same words.  In alot of cases, all you need is about the first 20 milliseconds of the start of a word at the start of a sentence.  This portion of human speech is most consistent (such as during a phone call, when you answer the phone and say "hello" - the 1st 20 milliseconds of the word hello would be all you need to compare to a known sample of the persons voice.


Blah is exactly right.  

As to voice recognition being used since the war on terror, its use is becoming more widespread and unfortunately Philiips is on the cutting edge, even to employing some questionable people to work in the field, many of whom might have connections to medrossas (sic).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:22:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All


SAN - are you here??

I am here now. :)

I'm so relieved!  There was a building that exploded in Manhatten today.  It held a DR's office and of course I immediately worried about you!  My husband tells me I worry too much, LOL  :lol:


Wonder if it was Abdul Mohammed Wahibbi's office.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Peaches on July 10, 2006, 01:24:22 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Susebear,
I keep getting all sorts of email from those products, too, offers of free samples, and one even from Phillips Products soliciting me to purchase their electronics.  I never received them before so must conclude this is some sort of massive PR campaign by the Dutch to promote their products.  I also send Breck Bulbs my reason for not purchasing for the first time in probably fifteen years.

Maybe they will eventually get the message?

.


Unfortunately Philips is about to take over the medical industry as far as technology goes.  Next time you are in a hopsital, look for the trademark on everything.  Of course, they have many different names under their umbrella, so you might not know it to be Philips, but it is as pervasive as E. coli in the drains.


You're right.  I get those surveys as well and I think BITE ME works pretty well.  I walk right by Ragu on a regular basis without a second thought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:24:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning All


SAN - are you here??

I am here now. :)

I'm so relieved!  There was a building that exploded in Manhatten today.  It held a DR's office and of course I immediately worried about you!  My husband tells me I worry too much, LOL  :lol:


Wonder if it was Abdul Mohammed Wahibbi's office.

It was some doctor's office and building and he was going through a bitter divorce.  His exwife said he was contemplating suicide.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 10, 2006, 01:25:37 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


Well, we are mixing oranges and apples here.  There was a call to William Norris and a call to the residence, which Jug did not answer and it went to voice mail, the call that Beth asked the state trooper to listen to when she was stopped doing 100 miles per hour and the state trooper escorted her and made sure she was save from Arkansas to Alabama on May 30.

That is what I remember as well. To me, this has always been the reason that Beth immediately used the term "Kidnapping."
I have always found it odd that the H/T's have not continued to "shout this out." This alone could have deflected a lot of criticism that the naysayers have been spewing.  My guess is that FBI has told them to absolutely clam up about this. That is one of the reasons I think the FBI IS very much involved and are simply remaining mum for much larger reasons.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:26:05 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


HAMMER
- On July 5th, 2006 Gunslinger indicated that he had heard the message and that it was most definately Natalee.  I'm hoping Gunslinger will come back online soon today to clear up HOW he heard the message.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 01:26:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - with all due respect, I will wait for confirmation of the phone call from someone other than Charles Croes.  

Gunslinger says he heard the call.  I want to know how or where he heard the call.  Gunslinger said it definately was Natalee's voice and that you would not need any special voice recognition to realize that.


I agree that the call shouldn't be discounted as being from Natalee just based on Croes saying it wasn't, particularly when he didn't say how he knew that.  

However I think that either there is no female voice on the call, or if there is voice analysis has determined it isn't Natalee, because if there were a confirmed call from Natalee after she left with the trio, even if for some reason the family wanted to keep that secret, which I don't think they would, something that big would have leaked by now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:27:51 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - with all due respect, I will wait for confirmation of the phone call from someone other than Charles Croes.  

Gunslinger says he heard the call.  I want to know how or where he heard the call.  Gunslinger said it definately was Natalee's voice and that you would not need any special voice recognition to realize that.


I agree that the call shouldn't be discounted as being from Natalee just based on Croes saying it wasn't, particularly when he didn't say how he knew that.  

However I think that either there is no female voice on the call, or if there is voice analysis has determined it isn't Natalee, because if there were a confirmed call from Natalee after she left with the trio, even if for some reason the family wanted to keep that secret, which I don't think they would, something that big would have leaked by now.


My thinking on these calls is that it is best to let JQK expose the phone calls and their origins at the appropriate time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 10, 2006, 01:33:11 PM
Hello. Cleaning house today and looking in now and then.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on July 10, 2006, 01:35:57 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


Add to that list the cyptic post by C. Croes when he made some reference to "what has happened to this lovely child".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 01:35:57 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - with all due respect, I will wait for confirmation of the phone call from someone other than Charles Croes.  

Gunslinger says he heard the call.  I want to know how or where he heard the call.  Gunslinger said it definately was Natalee's voice and that you would not need any special voice recognition to realize that.


I agree that the call shouldn't be discounted as being from Natalee just based on Croes saying it wasn't, particularly when he didn't say how he knew that.  

However I think that either there is no female voice on the call, or if there is voice analysis has determined it isn't Natalee, because if there were a confirmed call from Natalee after she left with the trio, even if for some reason the family wanted to keep that secret, which I don't think they would, something that big would have leaked by now.


I believe this to be the case myself Shizaru...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 01:40:40 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - with all due respect, I will wait for confirmation of the phone call from someone other than Charles Croes.  

Gunslinger says he heard the call.  I want to know how or where he heard the call.  Gunslinger said it definately was Natalee's voice and that you would not need any special voice recognition to realize that.


I agree that the call shouldn't be discounted as being from Natalee just based on Croes saying it wasn't, particularly when he didn't say how he knew that.  

However I think that either there is no female voice on the call, or if there is voice analysis has determined it isn't Natalee, because if there were a confirmed call from Natalee after she left with the trio, even if for some reason the family wanted to keep that secret, which I don't think they would, something that big would have leaked by now.


My thinking on these calls is that it is best to let JQK expose the phone calls and their origins at the appropriate time.


That's just it Tylergal.  I think it would have been in JQK and the H/T camps to have this info (if authenticated) made public because it helps enhance their case in the court of public opinion.  And, that is what's most important here.  Remember, they were trying to apply pressure to the Aruban LE and prosecutors to solve this case by way of a boycott and other methods during this time.  It would have only strengthened thier position by making these calls public (if they are, in fact, real)...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:43:57 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - with all due respect, I will wait for confirmation of the phone call from someone other than Charles Croes.  

Gunslinger says he heard the call.  I want to know how or where he heard the call.  Gunslinger said it definately was Natalee's voice and that you would not need any special voice recognition to realize that.


I agree that the call shouldn't be discounted as being from Natalee just based on Croes saying it wasn't, particularly when he didn't say how he knew that.  

However I think that either there is no female voice on the call, or if there is voice analysis has determined it isn't Natalee, because if there were a confirmed call from Natalee after she left with the trio, even if for some reason the family wanted to keep that secret, which I don't think they would, something that big would have leaked by now.


My thinking on these calls is that it is best to let JQK expose the phone calls and their origins at the appropriate time.


That's just it Tylergal.  I think it would have been in JQK and the H/T camps to have this info (if authenticated) made public because it helps enhance their case in the court of public opinion.  And, that is what's most important here.  Remember, they were trying to apply pressure to the Aruban LE and prosecutors to solve this case by way of a boycott and other methods during this time.  It would have only strengthened thier position by making these calls public (if they are, in fact, real)...


These calls were discussed on TV within 48 hours of Natalee's disappearance.  I am of the impression that FBI asked them to not talk about them any more.  I heard the discussion where Beth & Jug discussed these calls and a few days later, I heard the FBI had asked them to quit talking.  It was my assumption at this point and time they were being told what to discuss and what not to discuss.  But then I probably know nothing, a la Gunslinger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Susebear on July 10, 2006, 01:44:23 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"


That's just it Tylergal.  I think it would have been in JQK and the H/T camps to have this info (if authenticated) made public because it helps enhance their case in the court of public opinion.  And, that is what's most important here.  Remember, they were trying to apply pressure to the Aruban LE and prosecutors to solve this case by way of a boycott and other methods during this time.  It would have only strengthened thier position by making these calls public (if they are, in fact, real)...



Unless by openly discussing "evidence" it makes it unadmissable in an eventual trial according to their rules?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 01:45:45 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Greta confimed on on her blog that there is a male voice on the call, saying "Are you calling home", supposedly C. Croes has confirmed that via e-mail as well.  Greta didn't mention any female voice on the call, neither did alleged Croes e-mail (e-mail also said male voice was preceeded by about a minute of moving vehicle sounds).
 
However I remember Dash/Alana Jordan saying she had heard the call and she couldn't understand what was being said but didn't think it sounded like Natalee (Dash's SM posts are archived on scrux, I think some of them are missing but it could be in there somewhere).  Apparently several MB kids listened to the call during the bus ride home.  And if it was just a male voice you'd think Alana would have specified that the voice wasn't even female.  So perhaps there was a very faint garbled female voice on the call too, before the male voice.  

I think the call probably wasn't from Natalee, and if it had been confirmed to be Natalee via voice analysis we would know that by now.  However it is possible that voice analysis wasn't able to determine whether it was her or not.  I had a discussion once with someone who seemed to know a lot about the subject and he said voice analysis is not as reliable as you see on TV, even if  FBI could clean it up enough to determine she was saying "I don't know these people", to confirm a match they would probably need tape of Natalee saying those same words, or at least some of the same words.


Well, we are mixing oranges and apples here.  There was a call to William Norris and a call to the residence, which Jug did not answer and it went to voice mail, the call that Beth asked the state trooper to listen to when she was stopped doing 100 miles per hour and the state trooper escorted her and made sure she was save from Arkansas to Alabama on May 30.

That is what I remember as well. To me, this has always been the reason that Beth immediately used the term "Kidnapping."
I have always found it odd that the H/T's have not continued to "shout this out." This alone could have deflected a lot of criticism that the naysayers have been spewing.  My guess is that FBI has told them to absolutely clam up about this. That is one of the reasons I think the FBI IS very much involved and are simply remaining mum for much larger reasons.


I think the call played for the state trooper was the call from the chaperone or whoever it was that notified Beth that Natalee was missing.  I have never seen thsi rumor of a call by Natalee to the answering machine confired anywhere and do not think it is realistic that the family would be concealing that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 01:45:55 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 01:49:39 PM
If per say we need to wait the 60 day rule.....could someone post when that 60 day limit would be up concerning NY judge....?? So many stories to follow now and so much to swallow.....any idea on her ruling??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 01:52:43 PM
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 01:55:05 PM
Exacting justice, how do you do that ith a communist system? Not sure but I think it happens.  Even Kruschev knew it could happen.  Aruba's system is shades of the old USSR, on a much smaller scale, so the possibility that the people on the island will wake up and want to regain their little rock from the Dutch is possible, but then highly unlikely as they sat on it for hundreds of years without doing anything, allowing the Dutch to take it over and enjoying the building of high rises, restaurants, and man-made beaches via the Americans.  To say they lack imagination or courage, would be an understatement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 01:56:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


HAMMER
- On July 5th, 2006 Gunslinger indicated that he had heard the message and that it was most definately Natalee.  I'm hoping Gunslinger will come back online soon today to clear up HOW he heard the message.


Hearing that call was the spike driven through my heart, and the reason I have so much suppressed hate.  I KNOW others heard it.  Much was discussed about it.  It has since vanished from the radar screen of msm.  There is a reason for that.  I cannot confirm it was on Greta, but it was on Fox.  

I will NEVER forget those words as long as I live.  

I can only say that those punks better hope I never get diagnosed with an incurrable disease.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on July 10, 2006, 01:56:41 PM
Kidnapping Ramped To Murder

Shizaru writes: "...because if there were a confirmed call from Natalee after she left with the trio, even if for some reason the family wanted to keep that secret, which I don't think they would, something that big would have leaked by now..."

As we know, the existence of the call itself was not kept secret, at least not for long, as Greta had Beth on TV talking about certain aspects of it.  However, I believe the meaning of the call "may" have been kept secret, and certainly was not publicized as part of news reports, and only recently came to light on these threads.

If indeed the code words spoken are as described, the reason to keep this on "need to know" basis ONLY, is clearly for protection of victim.  As overt distress message delivered via cell would have endangered Natalee even more (assuming of course she survived in kidnapped manner for days after May 30).  In these situations, when violent/desperate kidnapper knows call for help has been made, chances of murder increase dramatically.

As reminder for all, these are the reported words of Spencer Bachus, R-AL, spoken on June 4 2005.

U.S. Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Vestavia Hills, said Saturday there were circumstances surrounding Holloway's disappearance that warranted the FBI being heavily involved. He declined to give details.

"The circumstances were disturbing," said Bachus, who formally requested the FBI's involvement. "I can't get into it, but it's something the family is aware of. There was an immediate recognition that this was not simply a teen who wandered off."


"Immediate recognition" -- suggests some people knew some things right away.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 01:57:47 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


So, Rob's like "Shango Jr." now, huh?  Trust me on this...those people who say they have "real info" yet withold it (for whatever reason) don't have any more then any of us have...period!!  How many times have we waited on these boards for those posters who claim "intimate knowledge" of the case turn around an offer up jack chit?  If I had a dollar for each one, I'd be the host of "The Apprentice"...;)

It's all smoke and mirrors...aimed at deception rather then assistance... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 01:59:17 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


HAMMER
- On July 5th, 2006 Gunslinger indicated that he had heard the message and that it was most definately Natalee.  I'm hoping Gunslinger will come back online soon today to clear up HOW he heard the message.


Hearing that call was the spike driven through my heart, and the reason I have so much suppressed hate.  I KNOW others heard it.  Much was discussed about it.  It has since vanished from the radar screen of msm.  There is a reason for that.  I cannot confirm it was on Greta, but it was on Fox.  

I will NEVER forget those words as long as I live.  

I can only say that those punks better hope I never get diagnosed with an incurrable disease.


Wait...are you saying you heard the call on Fox News?  Th actual call?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 01:59:22 PM
Quote from: "Jerry from Ohio"
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Later!


 AWE FM  that is truly sad and if I may I will send up smoke tonite for her and her family  if ya can please post her first name if your ok with that  if not the great father will already know who she is .
  May you also find strength in dealing with the situation ,
   Jerry from Ohio


Her name is Dawn (the receptionist) and I just feel so sorry for her she was crying something pitiful!

Her daughter (Dawn's) is expecting a baby in just a few weeks and that lovely little boy will never know his Great Grandma!

Her Mom had a vast # of health problems including some renal failure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:00:28 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


HAMMER
- On July 5th, 2006 Gunslinger indicated that he had heard the message and that it was most definately Natalee.  I'm hoping Gunslinger will come back online soon today to clear up HOW he heard the message.


Hearing that call was the spike driven through my heart, and the reason I have so much suppressed hate.  I KNOW others heard it.  Much was discussed about it.  It has since vanished from the radar screen of msm.  There is a reason for that.  I cannot confirm it was on Greta, but it was on Fox.  

I will NEVER forget those words as long as I live.  

I can only say that those punks better hope I never get diagnosed with an incurrable disease.


Wait...are you saying you heard the call on Fox News?  Th actual call?


That is correct.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 02:02:10 PM
Old, decrepit Easy with a heart problem brought on by age!  FU!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/OldEasy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 02:02:31 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
If per say we need to wait the 60 day rule.....could someone post when that 60 day limit would be up concerning NY judge....?? So many stories to follow now and so much to swallow.....any idea on her ruling??


What is the consensus on the long wait, is it

good sign for plaintiffs, shows she is taking it seriously, and if she were inclined to dismiss she would have done so already

or

bad sign, shows she is not taking it seriously, she has put it it at the bottom of the pile


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:03:17 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"


Wait...are you saying you heard the call on Fox News?  Th actual call?


That is correct.


Has anyone else heard it on Fox?  To my knowledge, I have yet to hear this from anyone else.  When (about) was this aired?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 02:04:07 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


HAMMER
- On July 5th, 2006 Gunslinger indicated that he had heard the message and that it was most definately Natalee.  I'm hoping Gunslinger will come back online soon today to clear up HOW he heard the message.


Hearing that call was the spike driven through my heart, and the reason I have so much suppressed hate.  I KNOW others heard it.  Much was discussed about it.  It has since vanished from the radar screen of msm.  There is a reason for that.  I cannot confirm it was on Greta, but it was on Fox.  

I will NEVER forget those words as long as I live.  

I can only say that those punks better hope I never get diagnosed with an incurrable disease.


Wait...are you saying you heard the call on Fox News?  Th actual call?


That is correct.


Ok....then why did you make it sound like you heard the actual call?? I sure do wish I was on the drugs I wish I was on....cause this is where rumors start......I HATE RUMORS! I WANT TRUTH.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 02:04:43 PM
hhmm, I don't recall the actual call being played on any news program.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 02:05:26 PM
Gunslinger - check your email please, TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:06:23 PM
Quote from: "casa"
hhmm, I don't recall the actual call being played on any news program.


That was my thought.  I don't think it was...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: the big hammer on July 10, 2006, 02:06:50 PM
Gunslinger --

Can you provide details re: your hearing of this cell call voice message.  This will help readership alot.

For example:

Do you remember when you heard it?
What show was it on?
What were circumstances of playing call tape, who commented and what was said?
Did you hear call message anywhere else eg, online?
You have previously provided your recollection of transcript, can you pls do so again?

Many thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 10, 2006, 02:08:22 PM
Agreed. This board would have been all over it if the call had been played on the air. I don't think it happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 02:09:17 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Cell Call Message...

I see call remains subject of discussion, as it should be.  And to be clear, I refer to vm message to MBHS student phone: William Morris, presumed to have originating time approx 3:00am, Aruba Time.  (I note Shizaru's f/u from NE stating call done between 1:00am - 5:00am.)

IMO, among things to consider is "rumoured" code contained in words of female caller: "I don't know these people..." and to couple w/ following:

1.  The news reports (from May31 - June4) citing Jan van der Straaten and his downplaying of abduction/kidnapping as being part of any potential crime.

2.  The unusal words of Spencer Bachus made during press conference in which he requested the "heavy" involvement of FBI:  he said the family is aware of "disturbing details" and further stated "this was not a teen (Natalee) who wandered off..."

3.  The headline on first posters hung on island upon arrival of HT family: kidnapped.

IMO, it was neither unusual, nor unexpected, for family to make existence of call known to media, etc during interviews, because assuming "code" is true, the real meaning of the words in the vm message remained unknown for many months after May 30, 2005.


Add to that list the cyptic post by C. Croes when he made some reference to "what has happened to this lovely child".


Which in MHO tells that he knows exactly what happened to this "lovely child" and had decided to be a lump o Chit and not tell the truth and what he knows but why?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:09:23 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"


Ok....then why did you make it sound like you heard the actual call?? I sure do wish I was on the drugs I wish I was on....cause this is where rumors start......I HATE RUMORS! I WANT TRUTH.


It is my understanding that is, in fact, what he's saying Nut.  He's saying he heard the actual call on a TV program...

Am I wrong?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 02:11:17 PM
FLYING MERMAID:  Might be that Charles Croes has a whole area named for him, "canochito."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 02:11:26 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"


Ok....then why did you make it sound like you heard the actual call?? I sure do wish I was on the drugs I wish I was on....cause this is where rumors start......I HATE RUMORS! I WANT TRUTH.


It is my understanding that is, in fact, what he's saying Nut.  He's saying he heard the actual call on a TV program...

Am I wrong?


That's the impressin I got also, thirdstrike.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 10, 2006, 02:12:00 PM
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 02:12:10 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"


Ok....then why did you make it sound like you heard the actual call?? I sure do wish I was on the drugs I wish I was on....cause this is where rumors start......I HATE RUMORS! I WANT TRUTH.


It is my understanding that is, in fact, what he's saying Nut.  He's saying he heard the actual call on a TV program...

Am I wrong?


Yes, you would be wrong in this case.  He said he had heard the call.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 10, 2006, 02:12:29 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


So, Rob's like "Shango Jr." now, huh?  Trust me on this...those people who say they have "real info" yet withold it (for whatever reason) don't have any more then any of us have...period!!  How many times have we waited on these boards for those posters who claim "intimate knowledge" of the case turn around an offer up jack chit?  If I had a dollar for each one, I'd be the host of "The Apprentice"...;)

It's all smoke and mirrors...aimed at deception rather then assistance... :roll:


man, aint that the truth !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:14:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Gunslinger - check your email please, TIA


Answered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:15:21 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"


Ok....then why did you make it sound like you heard the actual call?? I sure do wish I was on the drugs I wish I was on....cause this is where rumors start......I HATE RUMORS! I WANT TRUTH.


It is my understanding that is, in fact, what he's saying Nut.  He's saying he heard the actual call on a TV program...

Am I wrong?


Yes, you would be wrong in this case.  He said he had heard the call.


No Tylergal, I would be right!  I said that he (Gunslinger) saif he heard the actual call on the TV program (Fox, he says).  So, I'm saying the exact same thing you are... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on July 10, 2006, 02:19:00 PM
Ok, I have to head out for a bit.  Getting a little basketball in on my lunch break...

Hope to see you all later though.

Strike


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 02:23:07 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


What the Hell does Ken lay have to do with this board......damn...I am soooooooooo mad. Back to Nat...... What I read in the gunslinger notes was that he HEARD it first hand....now that is not true??....Now he heard it from tv?? I don't think what I read on a few pages back was that he heard it through grapevine.....he said HE HEARD IT! AS IN.....actually heard the call, himself, then....at the time. NOO?????? God, will someone please tell me what is gooing on cause I don't like games.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 02:25:28 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


What the Hell does Ken lay have to do with this board......damn...I am soooooooooo mad. Back to Nat...... What I read in the gunslinger notes was that he HEARD it first hand....now that is not true??....Now he heard it from tv?? I don't think what I read on a few pages back was that he heard it through grapevine.....he said HE HEARD IT! AS IN.....actually heard the call, himself, then....at the time. NOO?????? God, will someone please tell me what is gooing on cause I don't like games.


What Gunslinger is saying is that he HEARD it on TV.  I'll search and see if  I can find any archived interviews with video.  It may have been a local Fox affiliate.  I don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 02:26:02 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


What the Hell does Ken lay have to do with this board......damn...I am soooooooooo mad. Back to Nat...... What I read in the gunslinger notes was that he HEARD it first hand....now that is not true??....Now he heard it from tv?? I don't think what I read on a few pages back was that he heard it through grapevine.....he said HE HEARD IT! AS IN.....actually heard the call, himself, then....at the time. NOO?????? God, will someone please tell me what is gooing on cause I don't like games.


gunslinger said he heard the actual call that was supposed to be Natalee.  He said he heard in on Fox television early in the case.  Myself and others said that we don't recall that the call was ever played on any television program so therefore he did not hear the actual call on television.  This is my take on the conversation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 02:29:20 PM
By the way.....Ken Lay really did die. No conspiracy......no nuttin....he is dead. Get over it, get used to it. The man is not on this earth now. UGHHHHHH.  :roll:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:32:26 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Gunslinger --

Can you provide details re: your hearing of this cell call voice message.  This will help readership alot.

For example:

Do you remember when you heard it?
What show was it on?
What were circumstances of playing call tape, who commented and what was said?
Did you hear call message anywhere else eg, online?
You have previously provided your recollection of transcript, can you pls do so again?

Many thanks.


Hammer/All

As some of you may know, I don't usually say a lot.  I do read here, and other places, every day.

I heard about Natalee on the local news station (NBC13).  I searched the Internet for all possible information and was directed to FOX news.  I had never watched Greta (or fox news at all) until this happened.  I used to post at courttv.  When cw would not permit links to a place called SM, I joined here.  It was before the first data loss.

As far as when I heard it.  It had to be in the July/August time frame.

As far as the show.  I want to say it was Greta, along with the promo:

"Is this the last call Natalee made before she disappeared?"

As far as hearing it anywhere else.  I only had to hear it once.

Natalee:  "I don't know these people!"

Male Voice: "Who are you calling?"  "Your parents?"

I appologize to everyone if I was not clear about WHERE I heard this call.  

I hope this helps.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 10, 2006, 02:32:51 PM
Wow its seems a lot of anger right now but I understand.. I too hope for a deep throat that will tell us all but its been 13 months and I don't see it.. I just come here to support Natalee and her family and know nothing more than I did when I heard that they had three suspects and one was a judges son and that they lied to the police.. Thats was all I needed and it seems that nothing else has changed for me..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Tylergal on July 10, 2006, 02:33:08 PM
Have a nice afternoon, Monkeys.  Play nice.  I am taking a plane with Ken Lay in search of Elvis.   :lol:   No, I really have plants to care for.  Having received two huge cobalt pots for an occasion, they need flowers in them and I need to super-glue them down to large stepping stones so they cannot be easily stolen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 02:33:43 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
By the way.....Ken Lay really did die. No conspiracy......no nuttin....he is dead. Get over it, get used to it. The man is not on this earth now. UGHHHHHH.  :roll:  :evil:


I don't think Port Valarie was saying that he was still alive.  She was just posting an e mail that someone sent to Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:34:30 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


What the Hell does Ken lay have to do with this board......damn...I am soooooooooo mad. Back to Nat...... What I read in the gunslinger notes was that he HEARD it first hand....now that is not true??....Now he heard it from tv?? I don't think what I read on a few pages back was that he heard it through grapevine.....he said HE HEARD IT! AS IN.....actually heard the call, himself, then....at the time. NOO?????? God, will someone please tell me what is gooing on cause I don't like games.


Nut, we haven't met.  I have been following your posts on al.com and here.  I am pleased to have you here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 02:36:20 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


Ggood Afternoon Monkeys!  I am again trying to catch up...whatr's new huh!  Company does put a serious dent in one's computer time.  Nit...I think I love you!  LOL  If one says, I have some info, but an not at liberty to tell it yet'....wait long enuf and something will happen and they you too can say...yep that was my ltop secret info!!! :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 10, 2006, 02:37:25 PM
Of course he died. I was just noting how goofy theories get started. OT. Forget about it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 10, 2006, 02:37:56 PM
I'm going to hangout at tylergal's house and see how she makes her roses grow, everyone have a good day and hopefully we will find some answers with programs like this weekend (Dana)..  Those to me are sanity checks and let me validate stuff that I heard vs stuff that I think I heard..  byeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Shizaru on July 10, 2006, 02:39:28 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
If per say we need to wait the 60 day rule.....could someone post when that 60 day limit would be up concerning NY judge....?? So many stories to follow now and so much to swallow.....any idea on her ruling??


What is the consensus on the long wait, is it

good sign for plaintiffs, shows she is taking it seriously, and if she were inclined to dismiss she would have done so already

or

bad sign, shows she is not taking it seriously, she has put it it at the bottom of the pile


No opinions on this?  Anyone here with any legal knowledge?  My instinct was that delay was good for plaintiffs, but when interviewing JQK recently Greta seemed to think the opposite.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 02:40:23 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


So, Rob's like "Shango Jr." now, huh?  Trust me on this...those people who say they have "real info" yet withold it (for whatever reason) don't have any more then any of us have...period!!  How many times have we waited on these boards for those posters who claim "intimate knowledge" of the case turn around an offer up jack chit?  If I had a dollar for each one, I'd be the host of "The Apprentice"...;)

It's all smoke and mirrors...aimed at deception rather then assistance... :roll:


TS...I love you too! :D   LOL.....some people are are a huge ego trip.....but like all trips...they will end :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 02:42:17 PM
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
Hello. Cleaning house today and looking in now and then.  :)



Me, too, just watching the fight about the phone calls, LOL!  I do know of at least one person who claims to have listened at the office of Spencer Bacchus so there is something on vm/tape that people are listening to.

But I think this may be being saved as a sort of ace in the hole to present to a judge should this ever get near one.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:43:47 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


So, Rob's like "Shango Jr." now, huh?  Trust me on this...those people who say they have "real info" yet withold it (for whatever reason) don't have any more then any of us have...period!!  How many times have we waited on these boards for those posters who claim "intimate knowledge" of the case turn around an offer up jack chit?  If I had a dollar for each one, I'd be the host of "The Apprentice"...;)

It's all smoke and mirrors...aimed at deception rather then assistance... :roll:


TS...I love you too! :D   LOL.....some people are are a huge ego trip.....but like all trips...they will end :wink:


Believe what you will.  Rob is being sincere.  He does have a valid source to protect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 02:44:03 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


What the Hell does Ken lay have to do with this board......damn...I am soooooooooo mad. Back to Nat...... What I read in the gunslinger notes was that he HEARD it first hand....now that is not true??....Now he heard it from tv?? I don't think what I read on a few pages back was that he heard it through grapevine.....he said HE HEARD IT! AS IN.....actually heard the call, himself, then....at the time. NOO?????? God, will someone please tell me what is gooing on cause I don't like games.


Nut, we haven't met.  I have been following your posts on al.com and here.  I am pleased to have you here.


Well, you use a different name on al.com, cause I have not seen this gunsling'  name there. Unfortunatlllllyyyy many of my posts on that forum get deleted because I always get caught up in major bad posts, lol. I do not start the havoc, I only watch and post, when I feel the need. Many, many posts get deleted from al.com/Nat. If you are so into this case here at SM, why not say what your name is on al.com? I have the same name in both places.....why not you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 10, 2006, 02:45:14 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
If per say we need to wait the 60 day rule.....could someone post when that 60 day limit would be up concerning NY judge....?? So many stories to follow now and so much to swallow.....any idea on her ruling??


What is the consensus on the long wait, is it

good sign for plaintiffs, shows she is taking it seriously, and if she were inclined to dismiss she would have done so already

or

bad sign, shows she is not taking it seriously, she has put it it at the bottom of the pile


No opinions on this?  Anyone here with any legal knowledge?  My instinct was that delay was good for plaintiffs, but when interviewing JQK recently Greta seemed to think the opposite.

I think it is a good sign for the plaintiffs -- if the judge was inclined to dismiss it -- she would ave done so immediately. In my opinion, there appear to be at least SOME grounds to hear it  -- therefore; I think it is likely to go forward.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 02:45:43 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
I'm going to hangout at tylergal's house and see how she makes her roses grow, everyone have a good day and hopefully we will find some answers with programs like this weekend (Dana)..  Those to me are sanity checks and let me validate stuff that I heard vs stuff that I think I heard..  byeeeeeeee



Terry,
just feed your roses bananas, the over-ripe ones are OK.  They will bloom like anything.  Don't tell Tyler I told you a short cut.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 02:46:20 PM
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/OldMike-1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:46:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
Hello. Cleaning house today and looking in now and then.  :)



Me, too, just watching the fight about the phone calls, LOL!  I do know of at least one person who claims to have listened at the office of Spencer Bacchus so there is something on vm/tape that people are listening to.

But I think this may be being saved as a sort of ace in the hole to present to a judge should this ever get near one.

.


Anna, I don't perceive any fight regarding phone calls.  I take full responsibility for the communication problem.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 02:47:06 PM
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 02:48:53 PM
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


TS...I love you too! :D   LOL.....some people are are a huge ego trip.....but like all trips...they will end :wink:


Believe what you will.  Rob is being sincere.  He does have a valid source to protect.


Well we each have the right to our own interpretation of what sources people do and do not have..... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 02:49:55 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "terryd270"
I'm going to hangout at tylergal's house and see how she makes her roses grow, everyone have a good day and hopefully we will find some answers with programs like this weekend (Dana)..  Those to me are sanity checks and let me validate stuff that I heard vs stuff that I think I heard..  byeeeeeeee



Terry,
just feed your roses bananas, the over-ripe ones are OK.  They will bloom like anything.  Don't tell Tyler I told you a short cut.

.


OT...Anna how do you get the bananas in their little mouths???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 02:50:30 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/OldMike-1.jpg)


good pictures Easy...one and all :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:52:03 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Port Valerie"
From Greta's newsletter today:

E-mail No. 3

Hi Greta,
It is I. I hope you do not think my thoughts are bizarre. It is my opinion that Kenneth Lay has disappeared and he will take a new identity. There is no way to prove anything when the body is cremated. In my opinion, autopsies can be bought.
Gale


Maybe he's alive and well and living in Aruba.  :)


Nah, he is in Japan.  He went back with the prime minister to live happily ever after with Elvis.


What the Hell does Ken lay have to do with this board......damn...I am soooooooooo mad. Back to Nat...... What I read in the gunslinger notes was that he HEARD it first hand....now that is not true??....Now he heard it from tv?? I don't think what I read on a few pages back was that he heard it through grapevine.....he said HE HEARD IT! AS IN.....actually heard the call, himself, then....at the time. NOO?????? God, will someone please tell me what is gooing on cause I don't like games.


Nut, we haven't met.  I have been following your posts on al.com and here.  I am pleased to have you here.


Well, you use a different name on al.com, cause I have not seen this gunsling'  name there. Unfortunatlllllyyyy many of my posts on that forum get deleted because I always get caught up in major bad posts, lol. I do not start the havoc, I only watch and post, when I feel the need. Many, many posts get deleted from al.com/Nat. If you are so into this case here at SM, why not say what your name is on al.com? I have the same name in both places.....why not you?


I haven't posted on al.com since the end of March, 2004.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 10, 2006, 02:52:37 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
just feed your roses bananas, the over-ripe ones are OK.  They will bloom like anything.  Don't tell Tyler I told you a short cut.
.

OK I have an over-ripe banana and I have a rose bush.  Do I mulch the banana around the base or dig up the ground and bury it or what?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 02:52:50 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/OldMike-1.jpg)


good pictures Easy...one and all :D


That's me happy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: ala_gunslinger on July 10, 2006, 02:54:18 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "ala_gunslinger"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


TS...I love you too! :D   LOL.....some people are are a huge ego trip.....but like all trips...they will end :wink:


Believe what you will.  Rob is being sincere.  He does have a valid source to protect.


Well we each have the right to our own interpretation of what sources people do and do not have..... :wink:


Yes we do, Sunny.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: terryd270 on July 10, 2006, 02:54:38 PM
My two cents is that if the judge takes the case.. I guess if someone asked you to decide an important decision in their lives, you would think of all the pros and cons of your advice.. If she takes the case she has to write her reasons for taking the case with her thoughts of the pros and cons of her reasons..  Whatever she decides will be there for a long time and she wants to get it right..  Civil law is never fast and it can take years to play out in the courts..  I believe if she does accept the case that the Sloots will default anyway and I'm not sure what that will buy Natalee's family, except a default judgement..  Maybe it will make it easier for JQ Kelly to have access to some of the files that Karen J. has and he wants access to..  

Has there ever been a civil case as the above for someone that is a suspect in a murder before the criminal case?  I know about OJ but that was after the criminal case..  I think this might be the first and I believe its to get access to records from Karen J. office..  Just my opinion..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 02:58:01 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/OldMike-1.jpg)


Why are you torturing me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 10, 2006, 02:58:48 PM
Easy: Now I want to see Bashful, Doc, Dopey, Grumpy, Sleepy and Sneezy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 02:59:47 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Anna"
just feed your roses bananas, the over-ripe ones are OK.  They will bloom like anything.  Don't tell Tyler I told you a short cut.
.

OK I have an over-ripe banana and I have a rose bush.  Do I mulch the banana around the base or dig up the ground and bury it or what?


Just sort of scratch up the ground around the base of the bush, peel the banana and sort of smush it so there is enough to go all the way around the base of the bush, including using the peel.  Kind of circle the base of the bush with the banana and peel and that's all.  Also hope the dogs do not find it as they will smear it all over themselves.  Some sort of dog ritual I guess.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 10, 2006, 03:00:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 03:03:28 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!


Nut that's not true people repond to you all the time !  Take it Easy and be Happy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 03:03:53 PM
I think I might be getting old.  Roses are red and violets are blue...

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/EasyOne.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Leslie on July 10, 2006, 03:04:21 PM
Nut44x4:  Welcome with open arms - hugs and smoochies!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 03:04:55 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Anna"
just feed your roses bananas, the over-ripe ones are OK.  They will bloom like anything.  Don't tell Tyler I told you a short cut.
.

OK I have an over-ripe banana and I have a rose bush.  Do I mulch the banana around the base or dig up the ground and bury it or what?


Just sort of scratch up the ground around the base of the bush, peel the banana and sort of smush it so there is enough to go all the way around the base of the bush, including using the peel.  Kind of circle the base of the bush with the banana and peel and that's all.  Also hope the dogs do not find it as they will smear it all over themselves.  Some sort of dog ritual I guess.   :roll:


My Steghorn loves banannas too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 03:06:42 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!

I don't care if a poster joined SM a year ago or a day ago, makes no difference to me.  I agree, we are all on the same side.  That's why I don't understand the bickering this morning?

Gunslinger was simply stating that he heard the call on TV and it seems like people are jumping on him for it and I don't know why?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 10, 2006, 03:06:53 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"


My Steghorn loves banannas too!


Is that a horse or a cow?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 03:07:00 PM
http://mgonline.com/grande01.jpg

stAghorn


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Patriot on July 10, 2006, 03:07:11 PM
Lets try this again. Klass I created a new topic by mistake can you please delete. Not off to a good start.

First time poster so take it easy on me.

Say the FBI can determine that it is NH on the VM, couldn't they also determine who the male voice is? Joran?K2?Paulus?Freddy?et


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 10, 2006, 03:08:06 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!

Nut, we are ALL frustrated! Klaas was simply telling you that maybe YOU should not be criticizing another poster. We ARE all on the same side here -- we may just perceive things a little different. Nothing wrong with that -- that's how we learn from one another!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Port Valerie on July 10, 2006, 03:08:07 PM
Hi Patriot. Nice name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 03:08:08 PM
Quote from: "Patriot"
Lets try this again. Klass I created a new topic by mistake can you please delete. Not off to a good start.

First time poster so take it easy on me.

Say the FBI can determine that it is NH on the VM, couldn't they also determine who the male voice is? Joran?K2?Paulus?Freddy?et


Welcome Patriot - I'll delete it for you..happens to all of us!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Anna on July 10, 2006, 03:08:57 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Rob on bfn is still promising info........just like MF on fob and so far no info...it all maked me sick. This girl is dead and they still hold back info, IF THEY in fact HAVE REAL INFO...it all makes me sick. Why torture readers with COMING INFO' when there is no real info. Fu** them. Get real and get down or SHUT UP>period.


Ggood Afternoon Monkeys!  I am again trying to catch up...whatr's new huh!  Company does put a serious dent in one's computer time.  Nit...I think I love you!  LOL  If one says, I have some info, but an not at liberty to tell it yet'....wait long enuf and something will happen and they you too can say...yep that was my ltop secret info!!! :roll:  :roll:



EXACTLY, SUNNY,

If it is so top secret, hush, hush, why even mention it at all?  Other than of course for one to feed one's enormous ego, maybe.

OK, I have a secret source who has told me lots and lots of stuff I can't tell the rest of you peons but would like for all of you to beg me to just the same.   :D And just because I have never revealed anything unique in the past doesn't mean I don't know it, just that I am not telling you.  You will just have to take my word for it, too.  Some day when it's safe, then I might tell you but until then you had better be extra nice to me or I won't.

I learned to play this game around age seven.   8) And as a matter of fact, I would lay claim to exchange of information with Jug Twitty concerning Head master as my unique information early on but that's another story.  8)  Lately I haven't seen ANYBODY with any new or revealing information.

Yes, I am as entitled to my opinions, and I do have them, as anybody else.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 03:09:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Patriot"
Lets try this again. Klass I created a new topic by mistake can you please delete. Not off to a good start.

First time poster so take it easy on me.

Say the FBI can determine that it is NH on the VM, couldn't they also determine who the male voice is? Joran?K2?Paulus?Freddy?et


Welcome Patriot - I'll delete it for you..happens to all of us!


To answer your question, I would certainly think so.  Maybe that's the problem though, maybe the male voice is not one of them and someone else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 03:14:52 PM
Posion Ivy!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/YoungMike.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:15:37 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!


Nut....I read all your posts...I often don't respond becasue I can't add anything to it...and you are right...we ALL are on the same side.....justice for Natalle and her family.....and as far as I am concerned anyone is welcome here as long as they don't slam Natalee or the family....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 03:16:45 PM
klaasend, I hope I didn't appear to be jumping on anyone.  I just stated that I don't remember that phone call being played on television.  I still don't think it was, but I guess I could have missed it but I was pretty glued to the tv in the beginning and was also talking to the cuz regularly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:17:15 PM
Quote from: "Patriot"
Lets try this again. Klass I created a new topic by mistake can you please delete. Not off to a good start.

First time poster so take it easy on me.

Say the FBI can determine that it is NH on the VM, couldn't they also determine who the male voice is? Joran?K2?Paulus?Freddy?et


Hi Patriot...welocme to SM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 10, 2006, 03:17:58 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!


Don't take it personally Nut.
I've been a member a lot longer and I get ignored sometimes too.

Fiddle dee dee...I just go eat bbq with someone else. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 03:18:34 PM
I'm crazy...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 10, 2006, 03:18:43 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Posion Ivy!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/YoungMike.jpg)


Damn, is that you too. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 03:18:48 PM
Quote from: "casa"
klaasend, I hope I didn't appear to be jumping on anyone.  I just stated that I don't remember that phone call being played on television.  I still don't think it was, but I guess I could have missed it but I was pretty glued to the tv in the beginning and was also talking to the cuz regularly.


I know Casa, I don't remember hearing it either.  I'm searching now to see if theres a video archived somewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 03:19:02 PM
Well, i've got to get off this computer and get ready to go and teach my writing class at the college.  Everyone have a good afternoon and I will see everyone later.  Daughter #3 is out of town so I get the computer!! haha


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:19:23 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


Ggood Afternoon Monkeys!  I am again trying to catch up...whatr's new huh!  Company does put a serious dent in one's computer time.  Nit...I think I love you!  LOL  If one says, I have some info, but an not at liberty to tell it yet'....wait long enuf and something will happen and they you too can say...yep that was my ltop secret info!!! :roll:  :roll:



EXACTLY, SUNNY,

If it is so top secret, hush, hush, why even mention it at all?  Other than of course for one to feed one's enormous ego, maybe.

OK, I have a secret source who has told me lots and lots of stuff I can't tell the rest of you peons but would like for all of you to beg me to just the same.   :D And just because I have never revealed anything unique in the past doesn't mean I don't know it, just that I am not telling you.  You will just have to take my word for it, too.  Some day when it's safe, then I might tell you but until then you had better be extra nice to me or I won't.

I learned to play this game around age seven.   8) And as a matter of fact, I would lay claim to exchange of information with Jug Twitty concerning Head master as my unique information early on but that's another story.  8)  Lately I haven't seen ANYBODY with any new or revealing information.

Yes, I am as entitled to my opinions, and I do have them, as anybody else.   :D


AMEN Anna!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:20:13 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Posion Ivy!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/YoungMike.jpg)


AAAHHHHH  my James Dean photo!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on July 10, 2006, 03:20:50 PM
Quote from: "Patriot"
Lets try this again. Klass I created a new topic by mistake can you please delete. Not off to a good start.

First time poster so take it easy on me.

Say the FBI can determine that it is NH on the VM, couldn't they also determine who the male voice is? Joran?K2?Paulus?Freddy?et


Welcome Patriot!  Kick off your shoes and stay a while.

FM - I just read about your receptionist's mother.  I am so sorry.  She will indeed be included in my prayers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 10, 2006, 03:20:59 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "casa"
klaasend, I hope I didn't appear to be jumping on anyone.  I just stated that I don't remember that phone call being played on television.  I still don't think it was, but I guess I could have missed it but I was pretty glued to the tv in the beginning and was also talking to the cuz regularly.


I know Casa, I don't remember hearing it either.  I'm searching now to see if theres a video archived somewhere.


why dont you just ask Red to call Dave and ask if we can have a copy of it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 10, 2006, 03:21:26 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "casa"
klaasend, I hope I didn't appear to be jumping on anyone.  I just stated that I don't remember that phone call being played on television.  I still don't think it was, but I guess I could have missed it but I was pretty glued to the tv in the beginning and was also talking to the cuz regularly.


I know Casa, I don't remember hearing it either.  I'm searching now to see if theres a video archived somewhere.


why dont you just ask Red to call Dave and ask if we can have a copy of it?


errr Beth


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Easywriter on July 10, 2006, 03:21:36 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Posion Ivy!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/YoungMike.jpg)


Damn, is that you too. 8)


That is a young me.  I'm blue tonight.  I think my tears will fall tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:21:57 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"

 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!


Don't take it personally Nut.
I've been a member a lot longer and I get ignored sometimes too.

Fiddle dee dee...I just go eat bbq with someone else. :wink:


Hi Jacque.......welcome to my world...but that's OK...I post when I want to.....got BBQ...come on over!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 03:21:59 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!



Hello MTWS!  Coral and you?
Nut....I read all your posts...I often don't respond becasue I can't add anything to it...and you are right...we ALL are on the same side.....justice for Natalle and her family.....and as far as I am concerned anyone is welcome here as long as they don't slam Natalee or the family....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 03:22:35 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nut - I can't speak for Gunslinger but I can tell you that I don't have the same name everywhere.  I really don't think it's a big deal.  I also don't see a reason to question Gunslinger about the call.  Why would he claim he heard it on TV if he didn't.  He has nothing to gain by saying it.


 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!



Nut....I read all your posts...I often don't respond becasue I can't add anything to it...and you are right...we ALL are on the same side.....justice for Natalle and her family.....and as far as I am concerned anyone is welcome here as long as they don't slam Natalee or the family....



Hello MTWS!  Coral and you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:22:53 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm crazy...


LOl....Yes, your are!!!  Did you and Sunfreak get the interview with L. Garrison and Dane set up????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 10, 2006, 03:23:37 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Posion Ivy!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/YoungMike.jpg)


Damn, is that you too. 8)


That is a young me.  I'm blue tonight.  I think my tears will fall tonight.


You're still you.  

The essence of what makes you who you are will never age.

Tears fall for everyone sometimes.

I find it can be a good release....

So I won't say don't let them fall....just feel better after they do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:23:47 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Well, i've got to get off this computer and get ready to go and teach my writing class at the college.  Everyone have a good afternoon and I will see everyone later.  Daughter #3 is out of town so I get the computer!! haha


Bye casa...hurry back!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: wreck on July 10, 2006, 03:24:26 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "casa"
klaasend, I hope I didn't appear to be jumping on anyone.  I just stated that I don't remember that phone call being played on television.  I still don't think it was, but I guess I could have missed it but I was pretty glued to the tv in the beginning and was also talking to the cuz regularly.


I know Casa, I don't remember hearing it either.  I'm searching now to see if theres a video archived somewhere.


why dont you just ask Red to call Dave and ask if we can have a copy of it?

I'm embarrassed to say that I have not read Dave's book -- is the call mentioned in it? If the call does in fact exist (and no one speaks of it) -- I can only assume that the FBI does NOT want them to talk about it. JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: flyingmermaid on July 10, 2006, 03:24:32 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Posion Ivy!

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/YoungMike.jpg)


Damn, is that you too. 8)


He does it to get me excited then ignores me.  I  think he is not the least little bit camera shy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: casa on July 10, 2006, 03:24:43 PM
Klaasend, I'll try to call the cuz and see if she knows if it was aired and if there is some way to find the answer in the archives.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on July 10, 2006, 03:24:45 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"

 I don't understand anything anymore....anything I ever say here is always questioned or ignored. So I did not join SM a year ago and I am NOT one of you all..WE ARE ON THE SAME SIDE!! I want justice for nat and her family, damnit!! I do not expect to be welcomed here with open arms after a year of you all being together, but damnit......let's not work against each other.
Egads, that is a line from The Poseidon Adventure .......whoa, I watch too much TV!!


Don't take it personally Nut.
I've been a member a lot longer and I get ignored sometimes too.

Fiddle dee dee...I just go eat bbq with someone else. :wink:


Hi Jacque.......welcome to my world...but that's OK...I post when I want to.....got BBQ...come on over!!


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: klaasend on July 10, 2006, 03:26:18 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 491


http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=63


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: blah on July 10, 2006, 03:26:19 PM
Quote from: "wreck"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "casa"
klaasend, I hope I didn't appear to be jumping on anyone.  I just stated that I don't remember that phone call being played on television.  I still don't think it was, but I guess I could have missed it but I was pretty glued to the tv in the beginning and was also talking to the cuz regularly.


I know Casa, I don't remember hearing it either.  I'm searching now to see if theres a video archived somewhere.


why dont you just ask Red to call Dave and ask if we can have a copy of it?

I'm embarrassed to say that I have not read Dave's book -- is the call mentioned in it? If the call does in fact exist (and no one speaks of it) -- I can only assume that the FBI does NOT want them to talk about it. JMO


i dont believe the FBI is even involved, are they?  Even if they are, why would they care if the family talked about it or not especially if it already played on fox news.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #490 7/9 - 7/10/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on July 10, 2006, 03:26:37 PM
Quote from: "flyingmermaid"



Hello MTWS!  Coral and you?


Hey FM!!  :D  I guess I didn't read far enuf back to learn anything about your receptionist and her mother...but i gather it wasn't good :cry:

Coral??????