Caylee Marie Anthony # 147 9/13/09 - 9/30/09

[SunnyinTX]

Here is a petition for no more air time that i found on the CBS comment blog

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/petition/851674974

thanks Jesse

[BooMonkey]

I haven't been here in awhile...not by choice. And no, I haven't been in the clink, lol.  Anyone want to give me the readers digest version of events starting with the 9/9/09 court appearance?  TIA, Lovinlife

Hi LOVIN'. I haven't been here much myself. Maybe some more well informed monkeys will give you the lowdown. I'm sure anything I might tell you would be all screwed up.

I'm glad to see you back! 

Oh Fanny,
What is the point of this?  If you have nothing to add, why post this poor pitiful me stuff?  A few weeks back, some of us posters expressed the negative posts and the harm it does to the moral to the thread.  Not as an attack on you, but as a tool for making the thread stronger.

Your very next post: "
I think he did too, ONO. It may have been an old document signed in June, but it was still pertinent to the case as the hearing was delayed about it through the summer till September. I don't remember ever really reading the whole document myself. Do I still have to say JMO? If so, I just said it."

Again, the point was posters who are very active like you are often looked at as knowing the case very well and thus, should hold themselves to a higher standard of being accurate in distinguishing what is fact, opinion and what is what they recall but are not sure.  When active posters misstate opinions as facts, others who are interested but don't have the time to research as much, learn the facts of the case wrong and that doesn't help Caylee and justice.  Again, constructive feedback, not an attack on you personally.

Your next post:  "I'm still sitting on Caylee's side too. Still on the branch, and still waiting. I thought this was what this thread is for. Being here for her is all most of us want. I know we are not alone."

Me:  Of course this is what this thread is for, but in a positive and productive way.  Is it not productive to examine how we can do research better?  Is there an issue with all of us using caution in distinguishing fact from opinion - especially active posters?  Is it wrong to ask for positive and productive posts and limit our off topic and me too type posts in the thread since Klaas has given us musings, JSM thread and other places to be off topic or have community with like minds? 

I hope you will see the request as how we can be better, not as a tool to distract the attention from Caylee. 
Best,
News Junkie

Sorry A_News, you are coming off as Holier than thou with this post. Not everyone who posts a lot remembers every detail. There are so many twists and turns with is case. We are here for each other, what we can't remember correctly, others will. Don't beat up another poster because she is feeling vulnerable or has been attacked in the past.  JMO

[SunnyinTX]

I just emailed CBS.  All they care  about is ratings though.   Their website already has lots of very angry posts, people are sick of these programs sponsoring these criminals.

Way to go WO

[can]

I'm here for Caylee too Fanny and if I have said something improper, I expect Klaas or a Mod to tell me so.

[SunnyinTX]

Tainting the jury pool at its finest.  48 hours, will just not be on again in my house 

Ya know, on the upside they might just continue to put their foot in their mouths - there is so much media coverage along with their police interviews, depositions etc that will be used against them to show them for lying pond scum they are - I can only hope they will face some level of consequence as well as Casey never seeing the light of day again, the latter I have no doubt about. 

Maybe they will say something, they are both loose cannons, especially Cindy. I will have to read on here what is said, that 48 hours show is officially off my viewing, though I will admit I rarely watch that show.

I doubt it though. What you get is an interviewer who knows very little about the case, asking questions that the Anthonys have well rehearsed, and they just lie....  the interviewer, not knowing the different versions they have already answered, just swallows the thing whole.   Waste of time, a complete waste of time!   

AMEN!!!!

[SunnyinTX]

Here we go again.   

Hey Fanny.

 

[Western Observr]

Tainting the jury pool at its finest.  48 hours, will just not be on again in my house 

Ya know, on the upside they might just continue to put their foot in their mouths - there is so much media coverage along with their police interviews, depositions etc that will be used against them to show them for lying pond scum they are - I can only hope they will face some level of consequence as well as Casey never seeing the light of day again, the latter I have no doubt about. 

Maybe they will say something, they are both loose cannons, especially Cindy. I will have to read on here what is said, that 48 hours show is officially off my viewing, though I will admit I rarely watch that show.

I doubt it though. What you get is an interviewer who knows very little about the case, asking questions that the Anthonys have well rehearsed, and they just lie....  the interviewer, not knowing the different versions they have already answered, just swallows the thing whole.   Waste of time, a complete waste of time!   

I agree. Now...if they would like to have Cindy sitting next to Kathi Belich for this interview, I'd pay money to watch that. CBS is no better than the Anthony family....truth is not the issue......money is the only goal for all of them at the expense of a murdered baby.

We are here for you Caylee and the truth will come out in time.   

Oooooh!   Good idea Tupelo Honey!!!  Is WFTV a CBS affiliate?  I would PAY to watch that interview!

[can]

It drives me crazy when an uninformed interviewer doesn't even know a lie when it's told to them.  The lie is not questioned and the Anthony's score again.  No wonder they like being on t.v. ... not to mention the $$$$'s of course.

[Western Observr]

Well I just looked at WFTV and they are an ABC affiliate. What a shame!
If you don't mind TH, I am going to email CBS and suggest they get a list of questions from Kathi Belich for the interviewer on 4hrs to ask....        

[can]

Well I just looked at WFTV and they are an ABC affiliate. What a shame!
If you don't mind TH, I am going to email CBS and suggest they get a list of questions from Kathi Belich for the interviewer on 4hrs to ask....        

Now that I would enjoy watching!   

[SunnyinTX]

It drives me crazy when an uninformed interviewer doesn't even know a lie when it's told to them.  The lie is not questioned and the Anthony's score again.  No wonder they like being on t.v. ... not to mention the $$$$'s of course.

Hi can!!!  JMO but I think CBS has signed a contractual agreement with the A's so the A's are allowed to decided what questions will or will not be asked. 

[SunnyinTX]

Well I just looked at WFTV and they are an ABC affiliate. What a shame!
If you don't mind TH, I am going to email CBS and suggest they get a list of questions from Kathi Belich for the interviewer on 4hrs to ask....        

WOOHOO!!!!

[can]

It drives me crazy when an uninformed interviewer doesn't even know a lie when it's told to them.  The lie is not questioned and the Anthony's score again.  No wonder they like being on t.v. ... not to mention the $$$$'s of course.

Hi can!!!  JMO but I think CBS has signed a contractual agreement with the A's so the A's are allowed to decided what questions will or will not be asked. 

Hey Sunny!  Yeah...but I can dream, can't I?  lol. 
I just think Kathy would be the best ever!

[tupelohoney]

I am bi-lingual too!  I cuss in TEXAN all the time

  You are too funny!

This whole situation is enough to make any sensible person to go off.  I know I have many times, including this morning.

[SunnyinTX]

It drives me crazy when an uninformed interviewer doesn't even know a lie when it's told to them.  The lie is not questioned and the Anthony's score again.  No wonder they like being on t.v. ... not to mention the $$$$'s of course.

Hi can!!!  JMO but I think CBS has signed a contractual agreement with the A's so the A's are allowed to decided what questions will or will not be asked. 

Hey Sunny!  Yeah...but I can dream, can't I?  lol. 
I just think Kathy would be the best ever!

Please don't let me take that dream away!  I would walk nekkid on my nose to see that interview!!

[tupelohoney]

It drives me crazy when an uninformed interviewer doesn't even know a lie when it's told to them.  The lie is not questioned and the Anthony's score again.  No wonder they like being on t.v. ... not to mention the $$$$'s of course.

Hi can!!!  JMO but I think CBS has signed a contractual agreement with the A's so the A's are allowed to decided what questions will or will not be asked. 

I feel that is the case as well...hence Oprah canceling the Anthony's interview.

[tupelohoney]

Well I just looked at WFTV and they are an ABC affiliate. What a shame!
If you don't mind TH, I am going to email CBS and suggest they get a list of questions from Kathi Belich for the interviewer on 4hrs to ask....        

Go for it.....but I doubt that they will use them and Cindy will never agree to discuss anything that is not on HER agenda.

[SunnyinTX]

I am bi-lingual too!  I cuss in TEXAN all the time

  You are too funny!

This whole situation is enough to make any sensible person to go off.  I know I have many times, including this morning.

same with me.....when news is slow the monkeys get restless.   This monkey is taking a 'me' day...nails, toes, hair...the whole shebang....ohmygawd!  that just made Wm. Hung singing 'she bangs' pop in my head!  I know I need a break!!!

[can]

It drives me crazy when an uninformed interviewer doesn't even know a lie when it's told to them.  The lie is not questioned and the Anthony's score again.  No wonder they like being on t.v. ... not to mention the $$$$'s of course.

Hi can!!!  JMO but I think CBS has signed a contractual agreement with the A's so the A's are allowed to decided what questions will or will not be asked. 

Hey Sunny!  Yeah...but I can dream, can't I?  lol. 
I just think Kathy would be the best ever!

Please don't let me take that dream away!  I would walk nekkid on my nose to see that interview!!

LOLOL  I'll just bet you would too! 

[A_News_Junkie_Monkey]

I haven't been here in awhile...not by choice. And no, I haven't been in the clink, lol.  Anyone want to give me the readers digest version of events starting with the 9/9/09 court appearance?  TIA, Lovinlife

Hi LOVIN'. I haven't been here much myself. Maybe some more well informed monkeys will give you the lowdown. I'm sure anything I might tell you would be all screwed up.

I'm glad to see you back! 

Oh Fanny,
What is the point of this?  If you have nothing to add, why post this poor pitiful me stuff?  A few weeks back, some of us posters expressed the negative posts and the harm it does to the moral to the thread.  Not as an attack on you, but as a tool for making the thread stronger.

Your very next post: "
I think he did too, ONO. It may have been an old document signed in June, but it was still pertinent to the case as the hearing was delayed about it through the summer till September. I don't remember ever really reading the whole document myself. Do I still have to say JMO? If so, I just said it."

Again, the point was posters who are very active like you are often looked at as knowing the case very well and thus, should hold themselves to a higher standard of being accurate in distinguishing what is fact, opinion and what is what they recall but are not sure.  When active posters misstate opinions as facts, others who are interested but don't have the time to research as much, learn the facts of the case wrong and that doesn't help Caylee and justice.  Again, constructive feedback, not an attack on you personally.

Your next post:  "I'm still sitting on Caylee's side too. Still on the branch, and still waiting. I thought this was what this thread is for. Being here for her is all most of us want. I know we are not alone."

Me:  Of course this is what this thread is for, but in a positive and productive way.  Is it not productive to examine how we can do research better?  Is there an issue with all of us using caution in distinguishing fact from opinion - especially active posters?  Is it wrong to ask for positive and productive posts and limit our off topic and me too type posts in the thread since Klaas has given us musings, JSM thread and other places to be off topic or have community with like minds? 

I hope you will see the request as how we can be better, not as a tool to distract the attention from Caylee. 
Best,
News Junkie

Sorry A_News, you are coming off as Holier than thou with this post. Not everyone who posts a lot remembers every detail. There are so many twists and turns with is case. We are here for each other, what we can't remember correctly, others will. Don't beat up another poster because she is feeling vulnerable or has been attacked in the past.  JMO

Boo - thank you for the feedback.  I didn't mean to come off "Holier than thou."  My intent was to help Fanny heal and see that it is not her personally rather the constructive feedback on how we could do what we do better. 
But, I see I am standing alone, so I will take a few days and evaluate if I should find a new home or just ignore and scroll past and try not to care how monkeys can be even stronger as LE and others often come here for information.
Again, thank you for expressing how some see my posts.