Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 12:05:42 AM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 12:05:42 AM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: hotping on November 21, 2008, 05:21:09 PM
WOW! I sure hope Kermit is Right!    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: San on November 21, 2008, 05:24:09 PM
SS...I am having to leave soon...if vms isn't here, can you please post the John Charles Croes pics in the new thread...

Would love to know who else he is related to?

Thanks in Advance!

(http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4153.0;attach=3495;image)

(http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4153.0;attach=3496;image)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 05:26:09 PM
Edward.I'm not understanding how this correlates with Joran's Hitler statement???Just his,as well as Paulus state of mind??What would Joran be hinting at??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Edward on November 21, 2008, 05:26:26 PM
I hope for Greta also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Blonde on November 21, 2008, 05:26:27 PM
Just wanted to post regarding K's reluctance to identify persons in photo's.  This I can understand but felt that a suggestion could be made to him that he could privately email either klaas or blonde to make identifications, which would decrease wasted time by our Moderator's on behalf of posters & the Mod's could then base the identifications on a reliable poster, not identified by either name or nic.

I just wanted to post regarding K's reluctance to identify persons in photo's.  IMO This crew was too trusting and did not know ALE as well as we do and some things were done to  compromised the evidence.
I have asked K to idenify the man in the green shirt my email is in my profile.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: johan555 on November 21, 2008, 05:27:56 PM
The Fourth Empire was in Venezuela and Aruba, the Dutch were expelled SS'ers to Aruba where they were interrogated by the police. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 05:29:20 PM
I'll bet that Francis is the brother of Charles Croes.

John Charles is the nephew of the American traitor, Charles Croes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: bastibro on November 21, 2008, 05:35:41 PM
Gielen Exposed tonight on Dutch talkshow  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=LVdusm9TUdQ

Quote
Peter says that Gielen is a scandalous woman, to insinuate that Beth has a hand in Natalee`s dissapearance. She`s totally insane, he insists.
She must have had a sunstroke in Aruba, he says.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: MumInOhio on November 21, 2008, 05:36:31 PM
I'll bet that Francis is the brother of Charles Croes.

John Charles is the nephew of the American traitor, Charles Croes.


I wonder...Thanks San

Links vms found on the family...

CITY, STATE   AVAILABLE INFORMATION   POSSIBLE RELATIVES
CROES, FREYA E (Age 50)

       DORAL, FL               CROES, JOHN C (Age 25)
        CROES, BRENTON T (Age 22)
        CROES, CHARLES F (Age 49)
        CROES, CHARINE J (Age 22)
        CROES, ROXANNE L

 
 
These are the relatives of John Charles Croes. Doral Florida.

All the ALE reports for John Charles Croes are in Aruba and his Hard Drive went to Holland.

This Charine’s grandparents are Carlos Croes and the grandmother is Croes-Eman

  1.    PDF]
09-01--2008 Body 2.indd   
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Roxanne Croes –. Paradera 117-C. 45. Emily Williams – Caya. Frere Arnold 3. 46. Kevin Arends –. Hooiberg 92-B. 47. Valentino Koolman –. Santa Cruz 222 ...
solodipueblo.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid= 362 - Similar pages
 
 
Brenton Croes
http://bcloves.spaces.live.com/
 
Charine Croes Family pics here.
http://solodipueblo.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=134
 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=199.msg34106#msg34106
 
Reply #926 on: August 12, 2006, 10:12:04 PM »   
________________________________________
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here is Charine Croes tickle site.  I need to look through her friends still and see if John Charles is there:

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=Sop5SEfmD7ZSVx1s

Is this girl related to Charles Croes?  She looks like him a little.

If you look through her photos she has a photo of her dad..not Charles Croes.  She does have a photo of her Uncle though that "could be" Charles Croes...not sure though:
 
LINKS

http://cs01.ewedding.com/v30/main.php?a=arscjc18
 
Charine's facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/people/Charine-Croes/773945439
 
John's facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Croes/1528686140
 
Charine's myspace:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=38092112



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: johan555 on November 21, 2008, 05:38:36 PM
Gielen Exposed tonight on Dutch talkshow  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=LVdusm9TUdQ

Quote
Peter says that Gielen is a scandalous woman, to insinuate that Beth has a hand in Natalee`s dissapearance. She`s totally insane, he insists.
She must have had a sunstroke in Aruba, he says.


Thanks Bastibro !!! toppie !!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Blonde on November 21, 2008, 05:41:31 PM
Thank you SAN for the crispy treat. Here's more for you cuz you're special

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.
I SEE A SKULL
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/cage.jpg)
BUT some people speculate that Tim Tehran gave a thumbs down, meaning it isn't a skull
and not human remains.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/thumsdown.jpg)
What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.280


TIM MILLER: We felt there was a skull in there.....
48 seconds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CFkZzKBviM


Greta van Susteren: "HANS MOS IS A LIAR."


INTERNAL INVESTIGATION WILL EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION,  VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS & ARUBA COVER-UP!
Hans Mos
Dolph Richardson

AMERICAN TRAITORS!
John Silvetti
Louis Schafer


Superior Offshore provides subsea construction and commercial diving services to the
crude oil


Are the Fabrications to mis-lead you orchestrated by American Traitor?

transform Superior Offshore into a world-class subsea construction and
services



ARUBA HAS PLANS TO BUILD A PIPELINE FROM
VENEZUELA TO THEIR ISLAND TO CARRY NATURAL GAS WITHIN
ABOUT 3 YEARS
ON JUNE 8 THERE IS AN ARTICLE IN THE PRESS ABOUT THEY WILL BE BUILDING A PIPELINE TO THE ISLAND OF ARUBA

793 on: June 08, 2008, 12:27:49 PM caesu
Gas from Colombia for the production of electricity and water 
an article on it
http://www.amigoe.com/english



SCHAFER IS REORGANIZING HIS COMPANY, SELLING OFF ALL OF HIS ASSETS, AND THEN RENEGOTIATING LEASING THEM
FROM THE COMPANIES THAT BUY THEM

http://tinyurl.com/6m74rp


SCHAFER ANNOUNCED BANKRUPTCY UNDER 'A VOLUNTARY PETITION AND THAT THE COMPANY WILL OPERATE
ITS BUSINESS AS A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION,which would indicate he is remaining in the business

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/080425/laf521.html?.v=2


John Silvetti, Lafayette, LA 70508

John S. distributes APS Sonavision sonars in the Gulf ,APS LLC focuses specifically on the navigation and sonar needs of the oil and gas industry.




On the next morning (December 19), I boarded The Persistence along with Louis Schaffer and Tim Miller and remained aboard for the next 24 hours
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

DECEMBER 29 THEY SEND A ROV DOWN, TIM MILLER SAID IT LOOKED
LIKE A SKULL


TIM IS SENT HOME ON DECEMBER 30


Three days after the OM made his announcement about what was found, they are crying broke!


APRIL 20, 2007, Superior Offshore and Company insiders sold over 10 million shares of common stock to the public, raising gross proceeds in excess of $152 million

(http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3038/datelinediversfromarubaqm2.jpg)

(http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/9862/tennisshoefromcagexc0.jpg)

(http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/869/shoeinsidecagecg8.jpg)

private eye March 20, 2008
Kyle I specifically mentioned the blue denim and the fact that would be the material of which the skirt was made,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.440



(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/4632/joranshewontbefoundmo4.jpg)


(http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/2392/datelinetrapbo2.jpg)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: vms on November 21, 2008, 05:43:25 PM
I'll bet that Francis is the brother of Charles Croes.

John Charles is the nephew of the American traitor, Charles Croes.
I don't think so because his name is Charles Francis.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Blonde on November 21, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
YOU GUY'S KNOW I CAN'T STOP UNTIL I HAVE ANSWERS THAT SATISFY ME RIGHT  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 05:48:53 PM
Edward.I'm not understanding how this correlates with Joran's Hitler statement???Just his,as well as Paulus state of mind??What would Joran be hinting at??

I'm not Edward, but I'll add my two cents based on wisdom gained during a lifetime and since following the NH case.

It is my understanding, the Dutch, in general, did not like the Nazi's.  The Nazi's took all the bicycles during the war and did not give them back.  They also starved the population, and from the stories I heard as a child, the Dutch were forced to eat their beloved tulip bulbs to survive (some have suggested that is not true...).

Some have suggested the Nazi comment was the brainchild of PVDS/JVDS to make the Arubans and the Dutch dislike Beth and the Americans.  And, to portray the family of Natalee Holloway as racists.

From the Vanity Fair article -
Quote
"This latest story [came] when he saw the other guys, the Kalpoes, were kind of finger-pointing in his direction, and he wanted to screw them also, by saying he was dropped off," Dompig says. "But that story doesn't check out at all. He just wanted to screw Deepak. They had great arguments about this in front of the judge. Because their stories didn't match. This girl, she was from Alabama, she's not going to stay in the car with two black kids. We believe the second story, that they were dropped off by the Marriott. But then the time line [Joran has given] starts to get into trouble."

In my experience, every culture, nation, group--has their own concept of color and race and ethnic slotting.  I don't think the people from Alabama or from my state "Wisconsin" would consider the Kalpoes as "black".  However, I believe in some places, all darker skinned people, those not lily white are considered black.  Just a different way of slotting the human race.

The topic of race and Nazi was much discussed early in the case.

Quote
fab
so they do not treat dutch from curacao different
when they go to holland ?
your rigth im not alloctoon living in holland

But you see I think there is raceism everywere even in aruba to deny it would be living in glass closet.

so if you guys think everything is dandy in holland Ill have to take your word for it.

Posted by: maria | Sep 6, 2005 11:03:25 AM
Quote
I guess the in burgeringwet is not raceism and dicrimination.

Posted by: maria | Sep 6, 2005 11:05:05 AM
Quote
Im just saying that before we start critizing other countries we should look at ourselves, writing the color of the skin on birthcirtificates is wrong as inburgeringswet.

Posted by: maria | Sep 6, 2005 11:12:20 AM
Quote
Do you have "color" written" on the birth certificates? ...is this in USA? What do they write for people of mixed races?

Posted by: Natalya | Sep 6, 2005 11:15:25 AM
Quote
Either your Asian, Latino, Caucasian or black.

I know one case where a baby was born. The Father was black and the father White. The baby das a bit of a color and they put BLACK on his certificate.
SImply for the fact that he had dark coloured skin. It did't even matter that the mother was 100% white female.

Posted by: Fab | Sep 6, 2005 11:19:27 AM

old RWV link - http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/09/natalee_hollowa_11.html (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/09/natalee_hollowa_11.html)

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: bastibro on November 21, 2008, 05:51:51 PM
YOU GUY'S KNOW I CAN'T STOP UNTIL I HAVE ANSWERS THAT SATISFY ME RIGHT  ::MonkeyCool::

I did get that impression Blonde ::MonkeyHaHa:: Youre GREAT!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Edward on November 21, 2008, 05:53:15 PM
Joran is a Moron..  ::MonkeyTongue::
He has been lucky and I am sure he rolls his fathers eyes all the time. ::MonkeyConfused::

The mindset of a Nazi is a political thought..
Paulus religion ? He is an atheist.
The Nazis said they " killed God.. With that thought.. If You had that mindset, that kind of thinking pattern would have no concern for killing OTHERS. Like Natalee
and So, It is..
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: johan555 on November 21, 2008, 05:55:52 PM
78  video's  on you tube Bastibro ? oeps  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://nl.youtube.com/profile?user=Justice4Natalee&view=videos


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: bastibro on November 21, 2008, 06:04:24 PM
78  video's  on you tube Bastibro ? oeps  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://nl.youtube.com/profile?user=Justice4Natalee&view=videos

yeah, as if i have nothing to do ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 06:06:48 PM
Edward.I'm not understanding how this correlates with Joran's Hitler statement???Just his,as well as Paulus state of mind??What would Joran be hinting at??

I'm not Edward, but I'll add my two cents based on wisdom gained during a lifetime and since following the NH case.

It is my understanding, the Dutch, in general, did not like the Nazi's.  The Nazi's took all the bicycles during the war and did not give them back.  They also starved the population, and from the stories I heard as a child, the Dutch were forced to eat their beloved tulip bulbs to survive (some have suggested that is not true...).

Some have suggested the Nazi comment was the brainchild of PVDS/JVDS to make the Arubans and the Dutch dislike Beth and the Americans.  And, to portray the family of Natalee Holloway as racists.

From the Vanity Fair article -
Quote
"This latest story [came] when he saw the other guys, the Kalpoes, were kind of finger-pointing in his direction, and he wanted to screw them also, by saying he was dropped off," Dompig says. "But that story doesn't check out at all. He just wanted to screw Deepak. They had great arguments about this in front of the judge. Because their stories didn't match. This girl, she was from Alabama, she's not going to stay in the car with two black kids. We believe the second story, that they were dropped off by the Marriott. But then the time line [Joran has given] starts to get into trouble."

In my experience, every culture, nation, group--has their own concept of color and race and ethnic slotting.  I don't think the people from Alabama or from my state "Wisconsin" would consider the Kalpoes as "black".  However, I believe in some places, all darker skinned people, those not lily white are considered black.  Just a different way of slotting the human race.

The topic of race and Nazi was much discussed early in the case.

Quote
fab
so they do not treat dutch from curacao different
when they go to holland ?
your rigth im not alloctoon living in holland

But you see I think there is raceism everywere even in aruba to deny it would be living in glass closet.

so if you guys think everything is dandy in holland Ill have to take your word for it.

Posted by: maria | Sep 6, 2005 11:03:25 AM
Quote
I guess the in burgeringwet is not raceism and dicrimination.

Posted by: maria | Sep 6, 2005 11:05:05 AM
Quote
Im just saying that before we start critizing other countries we should look at ourselves, writing the color of the skin on birthcirtificates is wrong as inburgeringswet.

Posted by: maria | Sep 6, 2005 11:12:20 AM
Quote
Do you have "color" written" on the birth certificates? ...is this in USA? What do they write for people of mixed races?

Posted by: Natalya | Sep 6, 2005 11:15:25 AM
Quote
Either your Asian, Latino, Caucasian or black.

I know one case where a baby was born. The Father was black and the father White. The baby das a bit of a color and they put BLACK on his certificate.
SImply for the fact that he had dark coloured skin. It did't even matter that the mother was 100% white female.

Posted by: Fab | Sep 6, 2005 11:19:27 AM

old RWV link - http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/09/natalee_hollowa_11.html (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/09/natalee_hollowa_11.html)

jmho


So was the statement from Joran about "Hitler" of his own doing,and or Paulus or someone else???I personally don't think Joran is that smart to divide and conquer.That would have to come from someone with a bit more knowledge of history.
Thanx WhiskeyGirl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: bastibro on November 21, 2008, 06:08:15 PM
Joran is a Moron..  ::MonkeyTongue::
He has been lucky and I am sure he rolls his fathers eyes all the time. ::MonkeyConfused::

The mindset of a Nazi is a political thought..
Paulus religion ? He is an atheist.
The Nazis said they " killed God.. With that thought.. If You had that mindset, that kind of thinking pattern would have no concern for killing OTHERS. Like Natalee
and So, It is..
jmho

I have been told Joran has Jewish blood, he`s a Dutch jew i think.
I`ll search for links  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: johan555 on November 21, 2008, 06:08:38 PM
Do you have the movie opsporing verzocht also ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Edward on November 21, 2008, 06:15:10 PM
I read early on on the Jewish thing.. Then someplace I read he was atheist.
That would be interesting to clarify.. As somebody from a Jewish background would could use Hitler comments in some derogatory sense..
In other words, one of the worst demonized thoughts he could come up with, in order to call Beth a name. 
To insult her..
I could see that..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: bastibro on November 21, 2008, 06:15:38 PM
Do you have the movie opsporing verzocht also ?

Only the On the Record version of it. IMO it`s of no relevance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 06:29:52 PM
Just a thought on Kermit's posts about a possible "pipeline" from Venezuela to Aruba.

OceanExplorer told us that the Persistence had no capabilities to detect oil (only side sonar capable of "mapping" the ocean floor). Well, isn't that exactly what would be needed to to know WHERE to run a pipeline?? hmmmmmmm  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 06:43:58 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Anna on November 21, 2008, 06:45:25 PM
Quote from Granny Toad today at 12:00:

Anna - not that it likely means anything much but have you any insight on what became of that front passenger seat from Paul's red & white jeep? I mean now it sounds like Joran left his muddy slimy mark that morning Paul pretended to have slept like an angel but ...

Another thing I've always wondered is why the 2 times close together latenight ATM cash withdrawals was that Joran or Paul?


--------


No, Gran, I don't know what happened to the seat but only that it was already missing in the very first photos of Paulus' car.  It caught my attention because he is a man from a family of five with three boys.  I have three and can't imagine the luxury of having a car seat removed or even getting away from them that way, lol.

As for the bank transactions, I do believe that to have been Paulus and not Joran for we don't have any accounts of Joran doing any banking on his own.  Supposedly, Paulus even had to deposit Joran's winnings so I tend to think it was Joran but have no way of knowing anything for a fact, not having been present at the time.

Same as others.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Anna on November 21, 2008, 06:46:58 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.


It is a large, commercial FISHING trap, not a crab trap as often described.  Much too large for crab trap unless they have some different species in that region.  Fish trap.  Dropped off and later recovered by commercial fishermen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 06:47:43 PM
From Joran's 5/31/05 statement -
Quote
We drove past the Lighthouse and after that to the Holiday Inn Hotel.  In the car the girl said that her mother was the sister of Hitler and that they owned a plantation.  She also said that Deepak and Satish were black and that black people worked as slaves on the plantations. The girl was very drunk.


From a link at BFN, quoting something from RU.  This is a translation from Joran's book (page 124?) -
Quote
She kept on asking me where she was from. I had told her that I didn't know. Natalee asked me this about five or six times. Natalee also told me that she was really good at French kissing and that she wanted to stay alone with me and French kiss. Natalee then told me again that her mother was the sister of "Hitler".


page 327 - from translation posted at BFN
Quote
There are whisperings that Natalee and Beth had a poor relationship. Joran notes that Natalee's friends and Beth have contradicted this, but then asks why, in a drunk coneition, she said her mother was "Hitler's sister". She didn't just say that to him, her girlfriends confirm she said it to them also. Joran says this is a remark that someone "just doesn't make" about one's mother, and it makes one believe that Natalee thought Beth was too "authoritarian".


Current Affair interview -
Quote
Current Affair
Reporter: What did she tell you? That you can remember.
Joran: She told me a lot of things. One thing she told me was that her mother was Hitler’s sister's daughter. I don’t know what she was talking, a lot of strange things...

Joran's 06/09/05 statement
Quote
I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times.

Satish 06/11/05 statement
Quote
While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that. My brother continued to drive into the direction of the "lighthouse".
::MonkeyConfused::

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES 6/17/05 statement
Quote
After that if I am not mistaken it was the beginning of June 2005, it was a Friday- or Saturday night that I bought a pizza at Domino's and then went to Joran's place. (with this the 3rd or 4th of June is meant; comment Croes). On that day I arrived at approximately 21.00 hours at Joran's place. I saw that "Koen", "Sander" and Joran were in the apartment of Joran and that they were playing poker. Koen and Sander are brothers but I do not know their last name. I had told Joran that I would be bringing them a pizza and a coca-cola. I also asked Joran if they had found the missing girl. Joran answered me that the missing girl had not been found yet. Then Joran told me that Deepak, Satish and he drove in the four door grey car, make Honda Civic that was owned by Deepak to "Carlos & Charlies" and that the three of them had then driven around with the missing girl. According to Joran the girl was strange. Joran told me that the girl was strange because she told him that her mother was "Hitler's sister". Joran told me that the girl wanted to see the sharks in the sea of Aruba and that they had dropped off the missing girl at the Holiday Inn Hotel.

Deepak 6/29/05 statement
Quote
On your question whether I heard Natalee say in the car that her mother was Hitler's sister, that they owned a plantation and that they had black people as employees. I had only heard the word Hitler. The rest I did not hear. Joran told me later all the things the girl had said.

Chapter 8 translation of Joran's book at BFN, pages 13 & 14 -
Quote
They start kissing again and Natalee asks if the 2 Kalpoes are his slaves. No Joran laughs and asks her why?

Natalee responds that her parents have a plantation and the people who work there are black guys. To her all blacks are slaves.

Joran does not know if the Kalpoes heard this or not.

translation of Joran's book at BFN -
Quote
P 334

Joran says: "Natalee did use cocaine that week. She had it in her possession and offered it twice to a peer, which was shown in Peter R. de Vries’ broadcast about the case."

Also that week there were many boats close to shore because of the Soul Beach Music Festival. Maybe somebody saw from a boat that she was alone on the beach, took her on a boat, raped her, killed her and threw the body overboard at sea.

Joran says that it's also not impossible Natalee was kidnapped to be a sex slave in South America. But Joran says if that had happened he thinks she would have been murdered because all the publicity made her too much of a risk to her kidnappers.

CHAPTER 11 Breakthrough by Best Friend Freddy - from BFN
Quote
P153

The girl said that if the Kalpoe brothers would had lived in her city, they would have been slaves. After this they drove to the hotel. When the girl opened the door of the car she fell on the ground. Joran wanted to help her, but she pushed him away.

Deepak Kalpoe Statement of June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
To your question whether I can make detailed statements about the conversations that were happening while we were driving this route, I can say the following. I did hear some things. I heard the girl say something about sharks and "Lighthouse". The comment she made about the videoclip. Joran had told me two days later that the girl had asked him whether me and my brother had been his slaves. The girl had told Joran that she was from Alabama, and that she didn't like people of dark colour and that they owned a farm and that the people working on their farm were all of dark colour.


Satish Kalpoe Statement June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.


I believe KJ formally asked the US State Department if Beth was related to hitler... ::MonkeyEek::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 06:47:52 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.
At first I thought you wanted us to explain our "monkey cage" here!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Actually, I think local commercial fishermen use the cage to catch fish in ( not sure what variety).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 06:49:15 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.


It is a large, commercial FISHING trap, not a crab trap as often described.  Much too large for crab trap unless they have some different species in that region.  Fish trap.  Dropped off and later recovered by commercial fishermen.

Thanks so much.  So the one in the pictures is probably being used .  I got the impression it was old and had been there for awhile and they were surprised to find it.  Maybe I read more into it.  Thanks again


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 06:49:21 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.
I can only speculate with all the restaurants in Aruba, they would have a need for traps, and it was said they put rags full of bait in them, however I don't know about the size and weight of this one.  It certainly is heavy duty.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Anna on November 21, 2008, 06:50:37 PM
BLAH!

I saw you calling me old.  You are a sight for sore old monkey eyes after reading all this.

Never thought I would say it but it is great to see you after all this time.  Guess we all wander back no matter what after a while.   ::MonkeyDance::

I think Greta has some new information but unlike most, I don't think it has to do with the trap but could be wrong.  I think it is more along the banking route. 

Or even maybe to do with Rudy Croes having the two dancer/sex slaves that said they were being held against their will as well.  Guess it could be anything so can't wait to see.

Watching her each night just in hope she sheds more light on this.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Blonde on November 21, 2008, 06:52:55 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.
Please start reading here
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 06:53:01 PM
Just a thought on Kermit's posts about a possible "pipeline" from Venezuela to Aruba.

OceanExplorer told us that the Persistence had no capabilities to detect oil (only side sonar capable of "mapping" the ocean floor). Well, isn't that exactly what would be needed to to know WHERE to run a pipeline?? hmmmmmmm  ::MonkeyShocked::

I think it would, Wreck.  But I don't have the finincial wizzardry to
follow the money. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Anna on November 21, 2008, 06:53:12 PM
Mariloo,

No, it is all crusty so I don't think it is in use now.  Some have speculated it was drug drop off point but there is too much growth on it for it to be used for much of anything currently.  Maybe just abandoned by commercial fishermen who never came back?  Lots from all over the world fish in waters far from home especially the Japanese and others who seek food in diverse locations.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Blonde on November 21, 2008, 06:54:01 PM
Quote from Granny Toad today at 12:00:

Anna - not that it likely means anything much but have you any insight on what became of that front passenger seat from Paul's red & white jeep? I mean now it sounds like Joran left his muddy slimy mark that morning Paul pretended to have slept like an angel but ...

Another thing I've always wondered is why the 2 times close together latenight ATM cash withdrawals was that Joran or Paul?


--------


No, Gran, I don't know what happened to the seat but only that it was already missing in the very first photos of Paulus' car.  It caught my attention because he is a man from a family of five with three boys.  I have three and can't imagine the luxury of having a car seat removed or even getting away from them that way, lol.

As for the bank transactions, I do believe that to have been Paulus and not Joran for we don't have any accounts of Joran doing any banking on his own.  Supposedly, Paulus even had to deposit Joran's winnings so I tend to think it was Joran but have no way of knowing anything for a fact, not having been present at the time.

Same as others.


can you post the pictures you have please.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 06:54:21 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.
At first I thought you wanted us to explain our "monkey cage" here!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Actually, I think local commercial fishermen use the cage to catch fish in ( not sure what variety).

I have to admit that is what I first thought, as well!!    ::MonkeyHaHa::   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Anna on November 21, 2008, 06:55:44 PM
Is it not possible to map the ocean floor AND look for Natalee at the same time?

Is it not possible to have an altruistic reason for helping her family AND a political motivation to get the ole MEP simultaneously?

Isn't this what killing two birds with one stone refers to doing?

I think we have seen a great deal of this kind of action and I personally don't have a negative judgment of those who might do it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 06:59:46 PM
Mariloo,

No, it is all crusty so I don't think it is in use now.  Some have speculated it was drug drop off point but there is too much growth on it for it to be used for much of anything currently.  Maybe just abandoned by commercial fishermen who never came back?  Lots from all over the world fish in waters far from home especially the Japanese and others who seek food in diverse locations.

Thanks.  Is this the one TM thinks a skull was in and was not allowed to go back and check because someone (aruban) already checked and gave a thumbs down there was nothing in it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 07:00:44 PM
Is it not possible to map the ocean floor AND look for Natalee at the same time?

Is it not possible to have an altruistic reason for helping her family AND a political motivation to get the ole MEP simultaneously?

Isn't this what killing two birds with one stone refers to doing?

I think we have seen a great deal of this kind of action and I personally don't have a negative judgment of those who might do it.


But I did ask Ocean if that was the case and he said no.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 07:01:16 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.
At first I thought you wanted us to explain our "monkey cage" here!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Actually, I think local commercial fishermen use the cage to catch fish in ( not sure what variety).

I have to admit that is what I first thought, as well!!    ::MonkeyHaHa::   

That is so funny.  I forgot to put crab or trap or explain.  I was thinking it , just did not write it down.  Nobody could ever explain this cage ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Anna on November 21, 2008, 07:02:07 PM
Mariloo,

No, it is all crusty so I don't think it is in use now.  Some have speculated it was drug drop off point but there is too much growth on it for it to be used for much of anything currently.  Maybe just abandoned by commercial fishermen who never came back?  Lots from all over the world fish in waters far from home especially the Japanese and others who seek food in diverse locations.

Thanks.  Is this the one TM thinks a skull was in and was not allowed to go back and check because someone (aruban) already checked and gave a thumbs down there was nothing in it?


AFAIK, there is only one fish trap in all of this so guess yes, that would be the same one.

And the only people in the photo I recognize for sure are Hans Mos, Kyle and that one front and left in the white shirt is the back of Tim Miller's head for sure, lol.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 07:04:55 PM
From Joran's 5/31/05 statement -
Quote
We drove past the Lighthouse and after that to the Holiday Inn Hotel.  In the car the girl said that her mother was the sister of Hitler and that they owned a plantation.  She also said that Deepak and Satish were black and that black people worked as slaves on the plantations. The girl was very drunk.


From a link at BFN, quoting something from RU.  This is a translation from Joran's book (page 124?) -
Quote
She kept on asking me where she was from. I had told her that I didn't know. Natalee asked me this about five or six times. Natalee also told me that she was really good at French kissing and that she wanted to stay alone with me and French kiss. Natalee then told me again that her mother was the sister of "Hitler".


page 327 - from translation posted at BFN
Quote
There are whisperings that Natalee and Beth had a poor relationship. Joran notes that Natalee's friends and Beth have contradicted this, but then asks why, in a drunk coneition, she said her mother was "Hitler's sister". She didn't just say that to him, her girlfriends confirm she said it to them also. Joran says this is a remark that someone "just doesn't make" about one's mother, and it makes one believe that Natalee thought Beth was too "authoritarian".


Current Affair interview -
Quote
Current Affair
Reporter: What did she tell you? That you can remember.
Joran: She told me a lot of things. One thing she told me was that her mother was Hitler’s sister's daughter. I don’t know what she was talking, a lot of strange things...

Joran's 06/09/05 statement
Quote
I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times.

Satish 06/11/05 statement
Quote
While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that. My brother continued to drive into the direction of the "lighthouse".
::MonkeyConfused::

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES 6/17/05 statement
Quote
After that if I am not mistaken it was the beginning of June 2005, it was a Friday- or Saturday night that I bought a pizza at Domino's and then went to Joran's place. (with this the 3rd or 4th of June is meant; comment Croes). On that day I arrived at approximately 21.00 hours at Joran's place. I saw that "Koen", "Sander" and Joran were in the apartment of Joran and that they were playing poker. Koen and Sander are brothers but I do not know their last name. I had told Joran that I would be bringing them a pizza and a coca-cola. I also asked Joran if they had found the missing girl. Joran answered me that the missing girl had not been found yet. Then Joran told me that Deepak, Satish and he drove in the four door grey car, make Honda Civic that was owned by Deepak to "Carlos & Charlies" and that the three of them had then driven around with the missing girl. According to Joran the girl was strange. Joran told me that the girl was strange because she told him that her mother was "Hitler's sister". Joran told me that the girl wanted to see the sharks in the sea of Aruba and that they had dropped off the missing girl at the Holiday Inn Hotel.

Deepak 6/29/05 statement
Quote
On your question whether I heard Natalee say in the car that her mother was Hitler's sister, that they owned a plantation and that they had black people as employees. I had only heard the word Hitler. The rest I did not hear. Joran told me later all the things the girl had said.

Chapter 8 translation of Joran's book at BFN, pages 13 & 14 -
Quote
They start kissing again and Natalee asks if the 2 Kalpoes are his slaves. No Joran laughs and asks her why?

Natalee responds that her parents have a plantation and the people who work there are black guys. To her all blacks are slaves.

Joran does not know if the Kalpoes heard this or not.

translation of Joran's book at BFN -
Quote
P 334

Joran says: "Natalee did use cocaine that week. She had it in her possession and offered it twice to a peer, which was shown in Peter R. de Vries’ broadcast about the case."

Also that week there were many boats close to shore because of the Soul Beach Music Festival. Maybe somebody saw from a boat that she was alone on the beach, took her on a boat, raped her, killed her and threw the body overboard at sea.

Joran says that it's also not impossible Natalee was kidnapped to be a sex slave in South America. But Joran says if that had happened he thinks she would have been murdered because all the publicity made her too much of a risk to her kidnappers.

CHAPTER 11 Breakthrough by Best Friend Freddy - from BFN
Quote
P153

The girl said that if the Kalpoe brothers would had lived in her city, they would have been slaves. After this they drove to the hotel. When the girl opened the door of the car she fell on the ground. Joran wanted to help her, but she pushed him away.

Deepak Kalpoe Statement of June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
To your question whether I can make detailed statements about the conversations that were happening while we were driving this route, I can say the following. I did hear some things. I heard the girl say something about sharks and "Lighthouse". The comment she made about the videoclip. Joran had told me two days later that the girl had asked him whether me and my brother had been his slaves. The girl had told Joran that she was from Alabama, and that she didn't like people of dark colour and that they owned a farm and that the people working on their farm were all of dark colour.


Satish Kalpoe Statement June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.


I believe KJ formally asked the US State Department if Beth was related to hitler... ::MonkeyEek::




Thanx WhiskeyGirl.Seems intentionally injected!What would the intended purpose be??What do they think would occur from this statement?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 21, 2008, 07:08:00 PM
(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/lukelogin21-11.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 21, 2008, 07:14:19 PM
Valero’s first refinery in the Caribbean, the Aruba refinery is located on the southern tip of the island, which is about 20 miles northeast of Venezuela.  Strategically located near key feedstock and product corridors, the refinery is equal distance to major U.S. Gulf Coast and Northeast markets.

The refinery has excellent logistics; with two deepwater marine docks with capacity for ultra-large crude carriers, six docks for refined products, 63 storage tanks with almost 12 million barrels of storage capacity, and a truck rack for local sales.


(http://www.valero.com/NR/rdonlyres/464E77EE-FC04-4C82-A2F1-60B8DDD36EDB/0/Aruba102008.JPG)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 07:19:24 PM
Is this Luke in Seattle the same age as Joran? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 21, 2008, 07:20:31 PM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!






   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 07:21:11 PM
So Cheny was there for a meeting in 2005, does 2 and 2 make 4???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Kermit on November 21, 2008, 07:22:21 PM
Someone please explain this cage to me.  What exactly is it used for and are cages like that still in use in Aruba?  I have never seen one like this before.   Please and fresh bananas to all.
At first I thought you wanted us to explain our "monkey cage" here!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Actually, I think local commercial fishermen use the cage to catch fish in ( not sure what variety).

I have to admit that is what I first thought, as well!!    ::MonkeyHaHa::   

That is so funny.  I forgot to put crab or trap or explain.  I was thinking it , just did not write it down.  Nobody could ever explain this cage ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/trap_model_fishhuts.jpg)
photo courtesy Klassend




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 07:22:23 PM
And I know you will throw stuff at me, but Halliburn does have a sister company that makes or uses Uranium....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 21, 2008, 07:22:54 PM
So Cheny was there for a meeting in 2005, does 2 and 2 make 4???

Smok'n! very good always.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bastibro on November 21, 2008, 07:23:09 PM
whiskeygirl:
Quote
The comment she made about the videoclip

What videoclip?  Do we know?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Kermit on November 21, 2008, 07:23:50 PM
Just a thought on Kermit's posts about a possible "pipeline" from Venezuela to Aruba.

OceanExplorer told us that the Persistence had no capabilities to detect oil (only side sonar capable of "mapping" the ocean floor). Well, isn't that exactly what would be needed to to know WHERE to run a pipeline?? hmmmmmmm  ::MonkeyShocked::

Oil is big business I think.
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Kermit on November 21, 2008, 07:25:41 PM
YOU GUY'S KNOW I CAN'T STOP UNTIL I HAVE ANSWERS THAT SATISFY ME RIGHT  ::MonkeyCool::

AND you WILL all get them.
I won't rest until you do and we put these criminals behind bars.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 21, 2008, 07:26:51 PM
Gutentag Ms. Klassend.

Time for moi to catch some files, none in the cage tonight for ol kermmie.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 21, 2008, 07:29:37 PM
It appears then that the hitler sources likely all came from Joran with the possible exception of Deepak who may just as well have been rehearsed and Lying For Joran.

Can any of you out there check to find out if either Deepak or Satish has applied for Aruban Dutch citizenship and passport?

OK, fish traps. They're wire or welded and have a way for the fish to get inside rather like a funnel, but no way out. It will have a gate of some sort for the user's convenience. A similar cage may also be used to grow small fish into bigger fish.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 21, 2008, 07:32:43 PM
Is this Luke in Seattle the same age as Joran? 

Man
23 jaar oud
Reno, NEVADA
Verenigde Staten
Laatste login: 21-11-2008


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 07:40:01 PM
It appears then that the hitler sources likely all came from Joran with the possible exception of Deepak who may just as well have been rehearsed and Lying For Joran.

Can any of you out there check to find out if either Deepak or Satish has applied for Aruban Dutch citizenship and passport?

OK, fish traps. They're wire or welded and have a way for the fish to get inside rather like a funnel, but no way out. It will have a gate of some sort for the user's convenience. A similar cage may also be used to grow small fish into bigger fish.


That is not what I was looking for.  The picture of this cage keeps resurfacing and I could not figure the importance of it.  Did someone think NH was put in one?  Is this why it keeps surfacing with the title of a tennis shoe in it and is this the where TM thought or believes he saw a skull?  This is what I meant.  Probably did not convey my thought very well.  I do that sometime when I am thinking and writing and then don't go back and edit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 07:43:46 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 07:45:59 PM
It appears then that the hitler sources likely all came from Joran with the possible exception of Deepak who may just as well have been rehearsed and Lying For Joran.

Can any of you out there check to find out if either Deepak or Satish has applied for Aruban Dutch citizenship and passport?

OK, fish traps. They're wire or welded and have a way for the fish to get inside rather like a funnel, but no way out. It will have a gate of some sort for the user's convenience. A similar cage may also be used to grow small fish into bigger fish.


That is not what I was looking for.  The picture of this cage keeps resurfacing and I could not figure the importance of it.  Did someone think NH was put in one?  Is this why it keeps surfacing with the title of a tennis shoe in it and is this the where TM thought or believes he saw a skull?  This is what I meant.  Probably did not convey my thought very well.  I do that sometime when I am thinking and writing and then don't go back and edit.
Yes Mariloo.  Every time I see your name I think about that song.  Well hello Mariloo, goodbye heart, sweet Mariloo, Im so in love with you..................................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 07:47:57 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 07:55:16 PM
It appears then that the hitler sources likely all came from Joran with the possible exception of Deepak who may just as well have been rehearsed and Lying For Joran.

Can any of you out there check to find out if either Deepak or Satish has applied for Aruban Dutch citizenship and passport?

OK, fish traps. They're wire or welded and have a way for the fish to get inside rather like a funnel, but no way out. It will have a gate of some sort for the user's convenience. A similar cage may also be used to grow small fish into bigger fish.


That is not what I was looking for.  The picture of this cage keeps resurfacing and I could not figure the importance of it.  Did someone think NH was put in one?  Is this why it keeps surfacing with the title of a tennis shoe in it and is this the where TM thought or believes he saw a skull?  This is what I meant.  Probably did not convey my thought very well.  I do that sometime when I am thinking and writing and then don't go back and edit.
Yes Mariloo.  Every time I see your name I think about that song.  Well hello Mariloo, goodbye heart, sweet Mariloo, Im so in love with you..................................

Thanks.  Ya'll move so fast in here, my little monkey mind is still trying to figure the other clues.  The fish trap got me.  It appears so big, like you may be able to put several bodies in it.  And then we think someone cleaned the cage.  By George, I think I got it now ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 07:58:46 PM
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

MONKEY BREAD AND MONKEYRITAS MY HOUSE TONIGHT.  YA'LL COME.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 08:00:49 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 08:03:52 PM
This is from a thread at BFN, it was brought over from FOB.  FOB is long gone, but traces remain.  In retrospect, some interesting stuff.

Quote
This was posted over at a site called Freedom Of Blog, I thought ya'll might want to read it.  Debbie if I have posted this in the wrong place please feel free to move it where it should go.

Quote
MF
Member
Joined:  Thu Jan 12th, 2006
Location:  Province Of Aruba, Netherlands
Posts:  198
Posted: Wed Mar 1st, 2006 08:31 am   
 
Joran is LIVE on the radio on http://www.top95fm.aw and taking call on 297-585-5555.

Will come with his comments later on.
 

There was a lot of call of locals with certain specific questions about the case.

He was asked about the pool meeting and he said that his father was never around any pool to create stories.

(snip)

When asked about his shoes he said that they were old K-Swiss shoes, size 14 and if somebody finds them call the police. That night one of the Kalpoe brothers said that he will go back to look for the shoes,but later said that he did not find them.

(snip)

He is denying having any plans right now on a book deal.

He never was a person that went to the church that much and since being in KIA he started praying every night, he is a Catholic.

He also denied that his father was the judge involved in the case with Sidney Ponson.

(snip)

Joran did say that his father DID NOT say "NO BODY NO CASE" or "GEEN LIJK GEEN ZAAK". But an anonymous caller said that he knows that one of the Kalpoe brother became agressive against one of the investigators and he was the one that said that famous sentence. Joran denied knowing this fact but assured that it was not his father saying this.

He never said, not even once that he had a sexual relation with her.

Beth even went to his school with a lot of people to put up posters on the property stating: LOOKING FOR NATALEE, ASK JORAN.

(snip)

Joran also disclosed that he had a 2 hour interview with Greta. His family and his lawyer were against going on TV with Greta since she is not a trustworthy person. He perceived from Greta that she wanted him to say something bad against the Kalpoes or to accuse them, which he did not, because he does not know what really happened.

(snip)

His last words to Aruba, he knows every body is tired and he asks for forgiveness from the people of Aruba for getting hurt by this case and hopes the case will be soon solved.

MO: I guess that Joran is fighting Beth's lies and PR by the only way she can be fought, with the media.

Media Freak

Apparently Joran is Catholic.  I always thought Joe T. said something like Anita is Catholic.  I'm inclinded to believe AVDS is related to the Queen.

If not around the pool to create stories, what was he doing there?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 08:06:15 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 21, 2008, 08:09:29 PM
How to explain how any fish trap got into the story, Mariloo. Let me put it this way. Early in the search for Natalee it was said that a fish trap had gone missing from down by those fisherman huts near the Marriott, as well as a few other items, a knife I think and some rope or duct tape or who knows.

The human brain wants to sort out patterns so a bunch of people made up What Ifs, what if Natalee were put into a fish trap, cut up, taped and tied and taken out to sea and dumped.

Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 08:15:18 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Makes ya wonder??Again.Did Air-Force 2 go down there?And again what was the purpose?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 08:15:43 PM
How to explain how any fish trap got into the story, Mariloo. Let me put it this way. Early in the search for Natalee it was said that a fish trap had gone missing from down by those fisherman huts near the Marriott, as well as a few other items, a knife I think and some rope or duct tape or who knows.

The human brain wants to sort out patterns so a bunch of people made up What Ifs, what if Natalee were put into a fish trap, cut up, taped and tied and taken out to sea and dumped.

Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.


I had totally forgotten about the fisherman's hut that was supposedly broken into.  I remember knife but I never dreamed a trap this big was what they were talking about.  I kinda skipped over that cause it did not make sense and I do not believe unless you had a crane, this could have been done.  This is steadied my mind now, I know how it fits.  I was trying to make sure this was the one also that TM was talking about seeing a skull in.  I am satisfied now.  Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 21, 2008, 08:17:04 PM
Whiskey, whatever that was from Joran via MF (was that scuba's daughter?) was hilarious, just about nothing in that text is true. Nothing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 08:17:40 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::  Granny Toad, call them as you see them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 08:18:27 PM
How to explain how any fish trap got into the story, Mariloo. Let me put it this way. Early in the search for Natalee it was said that a fish trap had gone missing from down by those fisherman huts near the Marriott, as well as a few other items, a knife I think and some rope or duct tape or who knows.

The human brain wants to sort out patterns so a bunch of people made up What Ifs, what if Natalee were put into a fish trap, cut up, taped and tied and taken out to sea and dumped.

Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.

granny, I know you have always thought "cesspool"  -- but tell me WHY (other than an educated guess), please!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 21, 2008, 08:22:06 PM
Mariloo FYI the fishtraps used locally by Arubans and the Colombian fishermen may have been sometimes nearly that large BUT would have been mainly WIRE, not welded metal like that one found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 08:23:44 PM
Mariloo FYI the fishtraps used locally by Arubans and the Colombian fishermen may have been sometimes nearly that large BUT would have been mainly WIRE, not welded metal like that one found.

Oh!  So this was quite an unusual find.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 08:29:04 PM
Klaas or any moderator.  Do you still have the first thread about Natalee?  Just curious.  I know there was a problem once and we lost all out posts.   Just curious if it is backed up on a disk somewhere and if they are for sale?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 21, 2008, 08:33:34 PM
2NJ that page fulla hooey is SO bad it has Beth at the school with posters when that was Jug and his friends. Beth at that time was at the polis station viewing the security video that Paul was busy at ISA lying to say the video films were broken, that's why Joran wasn't seen on them.

No I'm not joking one bit.

OK Wreck - me and the cesspool.  Don't know if you recall Blacklable, the kids called him Blackie, he'd stay up nights chatting at RWV even after he went over to Curacao, gave me the cesspool idea. And it's not a bad one, overall. What cesspool was to me though is more an icon, about all the places Aruba refused to search and would not allow to be searched.

Brains searching out patterns - it sure didn't take me long to figure out I could read Papiamento
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: San on November 21, 2008, 08:33:51 PM
Klaas or any moderator.  Do you still have the first thread about Natalee?  Just curious.  I know there was a problem once and we lost all out posts.   Just curious if it is backed up on a disk somewhere and if they are for sale?

There is the Natalee Holloway Archives.  Not all the posts but some were recovered.

Natalee Discussions (2005 ARCHIVE)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=collapse;c=4;sa=expand#4


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 08:39:39 PM
Klaas or any moderator.  Do you still have the first thread about Natalee?  Just curious.  I know there was a problem once and we lost all out posts.   Just curious if it is backed up on a disk somewhere and if they are for sale?

There is the Natalee Holloway Archives.  Not all the posts but some were recovered.

Natalee Discussions (2005 ARCHIVE)

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=collapse;c=4;sa=expand#4

We had some Trolls back then. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 21, 2008, 08:41:12 PM
It appears surprisingly huge in the video showing the divers..
It must weigh a ton and it would have to be launched by a crane, off a professional fishing ship similar in size to the ships shown on the T.V. show "The Amazing Catch"
These Ships are 150 foot long or bigger and have Cranes mounted on them to pick the cages  and special platforms to launch them. There is a long rope tied to the cage with a buoy that floats on the surface of the ocean, so they know where the trap is located. They also have special hoists to bring them up from the bottom.
These ships are very large and they can stack 100 or more of these traps on deck.
If the traps are not tied down properly they can fall off in heavy seas. We have seen Persistence in very heavy seas working.
I looked for the long rope but did not see one ..Then again my view was limited by the video.
So how did this one trap get there ? The traps/cages shown to us in the beginning were able to be moved manually by 2 men..
Lie granny wrote they were made of light guage wire.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 08:43:43 PM
2NJ that page fulla hooey is SO bad it has Beth at the school with posters when that was Jug and his friends. Beth at that time was at the polis station viewing the security video that Paul was busy at ISA lying to say the video films were broken, that's why Joran wasn't seen on them.

No I'm not joking one bit.

OK Wreck - me and the cesspool.  Don't know if you recall Blacklable, the kids called him Blackie, he'd stay up nights chatting at RWV even after he went over to Curacao, gave me the cesspool idea. And it's not a bad one, overall. What cesspool was to me though is more an icon, about all the places Aruba refused to search and would not allow to be searched.

Brains searching out patterns - it sure didn't take me long to figure out I could read Papiamento
 
I remember "Blackie"!

Yes, we all figured after awhile that Pap is the language of deception -- we all could understand it after a few weeks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 21, 2008, 08:46:26 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Makes ya wonder??Again.Did Air-Force 2 go down there?And again what was the purpose?

We'll NEVER know, we're just the arse***** that had to pay for all the shenanigans that have just about crippled our country.  Remember that crook of a VP had his energy meeting, Congress requested information, denied all access under the shield of USA Security, yeah right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Greed & evil combined makes for a horrible concoction.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 08:48:47 PM
2NJ that page fulla hooey is SO bad it has Beth at the school with posters when that was Jug and his friends. Beth at that time was at the polis station viewing the security video that Paul was busy at ISA lying to say the video films were broken, that's why Joran wasn't seen on them.

No I'm not joking one bit.

OK Wreck - me and the cesspool.  Don't know if you recall Blacklable, the kids called him Blackie, he'd stay up nights chatting at RWV even after he went over to Curacao, gave me the cesspool idea. And it's not a bad one, overall. What cesspool was to me though is more an icon, about all the places Aruba refused to search and would not allow to be searched.

Brains searching out patterns - it sure didn't take me long to figure out I could read Papiamento
 
When you say cesspool, are you talking about a unit for one family or something larger for more familes???  Are they covered???  Are they like a retaining pond????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Dayhiker on November 21, 2008, 08:49:56 PM

I believe KJ formally asked the US State Department if Beth was related to hitler... ::MonkeyEek::




We just don't understand their "system"!!! ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Dayhiker on November 21, 2008, 08:52:39 PM
It appears then that the hitler sources likely all came from Joran with the possible exception of Deepak who may just as well have been rehearsed and Lying For Joran.



My guess was that came from Paulus. Common lawyer misdirection. Numnuts is too stupid to think of it. They may have all gotten it from the pool meeting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 08:54:45 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Makes ya wonder??Again.Did Air-Force 2 go down there?And again what was the purpose?

Because Halliburton is going to lay the pipeline. IMO
That plane can only use the call sign Air Force II if Cheney is on board.
He was there, but never got off the plane.
I don't know who went to the Persistence, but the Persistence booked
it outta there as soon as Cheney took off.
It is Cheney in cahoots with Scheffer and Silvestri.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 08:56:20 PM
2NJ that page fulla hooey is SO bad it has Beth at the school with posters when that was Jug and his friends. Beth at that time was at the polis station viewing the security video that Paul was busy at ISA lying to say the video films were broken, that's why Joran wasn't seen on them.

No I'm not joking one bit.

OK Wreck - me and the cesspool.  Don't know if you recall Blacklable, the kids called him Blackie, he'd stay up nights chatting at RWV even after he went over to Curacao, gave me the cesspool idea. And it's not a bad one, overall. What cesspool was to me though is more an icon, about all the places Aruba refused to search and would not allow to be searched.  Brains searching out patterns - it sure didn't take me long to figure out I could read Papiamento
 
When you say cesspool, are you talking about a unit for one family or something larger for more familes???  Are they covered???  Are they like a retaining pond????

Always1,  I think, and I am not the Grannytoad, that she is suggesting that it represents a number of areas on Aurba where something hideous does, or did occur, not a "physical structure" cesspool. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 21, 2008, 08:56:25 PM
The house I grew up in had a cesspool.  About 2 feet wide, circular, remove the cover & it's just a deep hole filled with **** waste from the house.  We lived there 10 years before it ever had to be cleaned by a service & that was while a family of 11 came to stay for an extended amount of time.

Could definitely dump an adult body into it for sure & after enough time for decomp the only way I would see a body being able to be detected would be to empty the cesspool & go through the contents, ughhhhhh & yekkkkkkk come to mind.  Doubt any such thing happened on LieRuba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Dayhiker on November 21, 2008, 08:56:51 PM

Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.[/b][/color]


Goodun' Granny!!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 08:58:05 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Makes ya wonder??Again.Did Air-Force 2 go down there?And again what was the purpose?

Because Halliburton is going to lay the pipeline. IMO
That plane can only use the call sign Air Force II if Cheney is on board.
He was there, but never got off the plane.
I don't know who went to the Persistence, but the Persistence booked
it outta there as soon as Cheney took off.
It is Cheney in cahoots with Scheffer and Silvestri.
Yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 08:59:13 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Makes ya wonder??Again.Did Air-Force 2 go down there?And again what was the purpose?

Because Halliburton is going to lay the pipeline. IMO
That plane can only use the call sign Air Force II if Cheney is on board.
He was there, but never got off the plane.
I don't know who went to the Persistence, but the Persistence booked
it outta there as soon as Cheney took off.
It is Cheney in cahoots with Scheffer and Silvestri.

What year was that?  I thought the speculation that it was condi rice on board?  Was that this past year in December/January?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 08:59:30 PM
2NJ that page fulla hooey is SO bad it has Beth at the school with posters when that was Jug and his friends. Beth at that time was at the polis station viewing the security video that Paul was busy at ISA lying to say the video films were broken, that's why Joran wasn't seen on them.

No I'm not joking one bit.

OK Wreck - me and the cesspool.  Don't know if you recall Blacklable, the kids called him Blackie, he'd stay up nights chatting at RWV even after he went over to Curacao, gave me the cesspool idea. And it's not a bad one, overall. What cesspool was to me though is more an icon, about all the places Aruba refused to search and would not allow to be searched.  Brains searching out patterns - it sure didn't take me long to figure out I could read Papiamento
 
When you say cesspool, are you talking about a unit for one family or something larger for more familes???  Are they covered???  Are they like a retaining pond????

Always1,  I think, and I am not the Grannytoad, that she is suggesting that it represents a number of areas on Aurba where something hideous does, or did occur, not a "physical structure" cesspool. 
Ok, duh, ok.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Dayhiker on November 21, 2008, 08:59:44 PM

I remember "Blackie"!

Yes, we all figured after awhile that Pap is the language of deception -- we all could understand it after a few weeks.


I remember Blacklable, and did anybody figure out who (((AG))) was?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Dayhiker on November 21, 2008, 09:02:25 PM
Whiskey, whatever that was from Joran via MF (was that scuba's daughter?) was hilarious, just about nothing in that text is true. Nothing.


I always thought the "MF" moniker was apropos, and never stood for Media Freak. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 09:02:50 PM
So if Cheney ( very big on Halliburton at the time) came to the Islands but did not step on Aruba, instead other people were there with guns.  Do we know who these other people were and where they met???

Cheney while in office can't have anything to do with Halliburton,and or any other business that would conflict with his "Public service"..

While Cheney holds office, his interest in Halliburton is held in a blind trust.
Which means he is still making money on it....he just doesn't know how
much, supposedly  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Makes ya wonder??Again.Did Air-Force 2 go down there?And again what was the purpose?

Because Halliburton is going to lay the pipeline. IMO
That plane can only use the call sign Air Force II if Cheney is on board.
He was there, but never got off the plane.
I don't know who went to the Persistence, but the Persistence booked
it outta there as soon as Cheney took off.
It is Cheney in cahoots with Scheffer and Silvestri.

What year was that?  I thought the speculation that it was condi rice on board?  Was that this past year in December/January?

I believe it was around March 1st of '08.Please correct me if i'm wrong!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 21, 2008, 09:05:38 PM
Klaas or any moderator.  Do you still have the first thread about Natalee?  Just curious.  I know there was a problem once and we lost all out posts.   Just curious if it is backed up on a disk somewhere and if they are for sale?

If you look on the main forum page there are some of the old 2005 archives available.  I believe it's only June 2005 though, we are still missing quite a bit.  There was a disc with those old posts and I don't know what ever happened to it.  It would NOT be for sale though, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 09:10:08 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:12:15 PM
Hmmmm, cause I thought Cheney stayed on Venzula and Air Force II landed in Aruba..................................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 21, 2008, 09:15:23 PM
O.K. My opinion only is the trap being found in the ocean was it was planted there to cover up the REAL reason for the ocean floor mapping.  I think that story was put out there (possibly by Jossy) to cover for the real reason the Persistence was there.  How convenient when it was all cleaned out they up and hi-tailed it out of there.  I don't believe this was a trip to find Natalee but a trip to map the ocean for a pipeline.  Who paid for it?  I don't know but this all had something to do with Venezuela and Chavez and the FARC kidnappings.  It was just convenient that Natalee was missing in the area and this was probably sanctioned by our own government. Anything less  and the Aruban government WOULD NEVER have allowed them to be within site of their shores.  I think Aruba bribe the US by saying they can search for Natalee but the maps they did of the ocean HAD to be turned over to them.  Mission accomplished.  IF that was Natalee in that cage then no one and I repeat no one in Aruba ever believed she was in that ocean and were probably as shocked as Tim Miller was when he viewed the monitor and said It Looks Like a Skull.

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 09:17:57 PM
Hmmmm, cause I thought Cheney stayed on Venzula and Air Force II landed in Aruba..................................
Cheney was NOT on Venezuela either. Tensions were high as Venezuela was mounting troops on the border of Columbia that weekend. Airforce 2 was there filled with State Department/CIA operatives to monitor the situation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:22:44 PM
So Cheny was there for a meeting in 2005, does 2 and 2 make 4???

Smok'n! very good always.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 09:28:03 PM
So Cheny was there for a meeting in 2005, does 2 and 2 make 4???

Smok'n! very good always.


We are talking about 2008, the same weekend that The Persistence left Aruba. IF Cheney was in Aruba in 2005 - it was BEFORE Natalee even went missing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 09:28:53 PM
The Fish Trap

Caps explained the fish trap to us one night.  It is a large commercial size.  He referred to it as a "post office" and it stayed there in that spot.  Drug dealers from Colombia brought heroine and cocaine to the fish trap and deposited it.  Aruban dealers then picked up the drugs and moved them to Holland.  In return, the dealers in Holland sent ecstacy back to Aruba.  The ecstacy was put in the "post office" where it was then picked up by the Colombians.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:30:06 PM
The Fish Trap

Caps explained the fish trap to us one night.  It is a large commercial size.  He referred to it as a "post office" and it stayed there in that spot.  Drug dealers from Colombia brought heroine and cocaine to the fish trap and deposited it.  Aruban dealers then picked up the drugs and moved them to Holland.  In return, the dealers in Holland sent ecstacy back to Aruba.  The ecstacy was put in the "post office" where it was then picked up by the Colombians.
Really, how do you know that???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2008, 09:31:43 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.180

Diario Newspaper March 1st 2008
Air force 2 owing to descend at aruba ... maximum security at airports
 saturday, 01 march 2008 oranjestad (aan):

Last aeropuerto of aruba was have extra security hour cu air force 2, one c-boeing 32 owing to descend. For of nightfall end was talk of the arrival of the plane here at aruba, which is esun ordinarily using for transport of the vice president of markets. Polisnan owing to being notifies for extra surveillance of airport rond. So cu owing to the plane descend 9'or of diabierna one night quantity of equipment owing to send for being give pabao attendance at the part where the plane owing to staciona. Was talk cu dick cheney will is there of the plane cu all his own safety cu owing to achieve autorizacion for march arm at aruba. Esnan cu owing to arrive there will bandona aruba monday morning.

Saturday morning will actuate the plane for one more part pabao close of caserne of bombero because airport is druk and the plane is coy much space. The part which is close cu plane is using for bay runway will let the air force 2 stop. On the photograph here can see more of the plane just past hour cu owing to descend at end of aruba.

http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1267&Itemid=30


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:32:45 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 09:34:17 PM
O.K. My opinion only is the trap being found in the ocean was it was planted there to cover up the REAL reason for the ocean floor mapping.  I think that story was put out there (possibly by Jossy) to cover for the real reason the Persistence was there.  How convenient when it was all cleaned out they up and hi-tailed it out of there.  I don't believe this was a trip to find Natalee but a trip to map the ocean for a pipeline.  Who paid for it?  I don't know but this all had something to do with Venezuela and Chavez and the FARC kidnappings.  It was just convenient that Natalee was missing in the area and this was probably sanctioned by our own government. Anything less  and the Aruban government WOULD NEVER have allowed them to be within site of their shores.  I think Aruba bribe the US by saying they can search for Natalee but the maps they did of the ocean HAD to be turned over to them.  Mission accomplished.  IF that was Natalee in that cage then no one and I repeat no one in Aruba ever believed she was in that ocean and were probably as shocked as Tim Miller was when he viewed the monitor and said It Looks Like a Skull.

JMO

I think that Kyle was too good at his job.  They never expected him to
locate a trap with human remains inside.  When he did, they had to do
something about the problem and intended to just cover it up, but Robin
had posted the pictures on the internet....oops!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 09:36:19 PM
Quote
I think that has been solved already. Before it was clear that Natalee had gone missing permanently (and remember Deepak and Joran were at the house later that night) this was a white lie on the spot, well we left her at the hotel - that is why I am almost sure the father knew absolutely nothing when the T/H came to his door. He calls Joran makes up a cock and bull story, because he wants some time with his son to find out first hand, why these people are in front of his door. He knew when he saw three cars together with police, that's why he did not answer the door right away or someone in the Aruban group had made an advance phone call to him - listen these people need to speak to Joran he was with this girl last night and now she is missing.

Joran calls Kalpoe they make up a story.
Then when it became apparent that she was not showing up, they had to find another explanation, but also an explanation which did not involve the Kalpoe anymore - Joran is on his own for that one, the two brothers draw the line where it comes to what happened when they dropped off Joran.
Joran himself has agreed to say, yeah I left the car with Natalee, we were alone, the Kalpoe left, they are off the hoek

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 8:09:38 PM
Quote
It was not Melody, it was another poster at the very end suggesting that Joran actually loves boys!
This would be a very daring move by the Joran attorneys!

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 8:17:15 PM
Quote
I was banned last night, did you miss me? I said something in a fake interview about the search of the cesspool.

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 8:21:33 PM
Quote
Seedy,
.... it was another poster at the very end suggesting that Joran actually loves boys!
This would be a very daring move by the Joran attorneys!
Because we do not know when this yet unknown witness gave his statement, we know nothing.

Posted by: blacklable | August 11, 2005 08:17 PM
Quote
Unfortunately although the American volunteers did search quite a bit as they were able, LE didn't allow searches of many places. "No corpse no crime" makes me think more of cesspools and the hospital incinerator than the boca on the east because there would be bone or something. Since so far as is known there has not yet been a full and reasonable search warrant at the vd Sloots that would also be recommended as well as at the Kalpoe's family. It's really a shame that the case wasn't handled correctly at the beginning.

Posted by: GrannyToad | Aug 11, 2005 8:35:42 PM
Quote
Granny, only because it was not shown on tv does not mean, the pertinent spots were not searched. You anyways believe only what you see on your own tv stations. You do not know, what was searched and what was not. Before any equusearch team had ever arrived on Aruba or before any weird witness had declared that he had seen a purple body, Natalee's father was searching the island already with friends and locals. He does not have such a big mouth, that's why what he says, is sometimes not heard.

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 8:40:40 PM

It's interesting that back on August 11, 2005 people were wondering why the VDS and Kalpoe residences hadn't been searched.  I wonder what may have been lurking in the VDS compound that time hadn't swept away?  No meaningful search of the VDS place has ever taken place.  The sands of time move and and have a way of covering up and moving evidence.

A day late, a Euro short...

Also, the gay reference start back in 08/05.  Wasn't it Guido's lawyer who made a point of saying his client was gay?  And people wanted to know why that made a difference.

Circle back to the friends and family and coworkers of PVDS = judges.

Also, since I hit the post button and am delayed by new posts...

I recall reading that Aruba has over a thousand illegal dump/cleanup sites needing a good cleaning.  It was something the authorities have taken under control.  Also, the Valero site has a number of places that could hide a body.  Machinery that never stops, fires, toxic places onsite from before WWII...and a nearly headless man.

Quote
seedy, check out the dates of the "boys" "SM" not as in Scared Monkeys pictures, it is a set up, his lawyers wanted to play the pink card from day one! This is the real cover up going on from day 1, the dutch are all queer and they smoke weed all day long (I am generalizing like you like to do - your style is intriguingly contatious)

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 10:33:54 PM

Quote
Linda, could it be, that in his twisted mind, he thinks it is much cooler going to school in the Netherlands? I do not think so, just like you are not showing the back of your tongue when you speak to someone - little white lies - if I tell you here that I am only allowed 3 hours a day to spend at the pc, and then right back into the streightjacket, because otherwise I have this strange urge to take a crowbar and wrick the cesspool open to jump right in to take a bath? Would you believe me? He probably has told some he is from Aruba and goes to an American Highschool and they did not believe it, well a white guy going to an American Highschool in Aruba in the middle of nowhere - too pretentious, they would not believe him - get it

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 11:12:56 PM
Quote
I think someone is trying to cover their behinds -the first guilty feelings that they did not better take care of Natalee, letting her wonder off, is worn down - let's hear from the group that later was allegedly on the beach?
And it plays right in the alley of Beth, who thinks anyways that Deepak was involved. Must come from their friend/telephone contact with or through Charles Croes - well known drugdealer walked away with Natalee!

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 11, 2005 11:51:19 PM
Quote
Rons, yes Satish was old enough to drive and he did too

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 7:19:48 AM
Quote
NYmom, was that in the local news up there? Because even missed people are not advertized in Aruba, this case would have made some waves. Who is stupid enouhgh to kayak in the Atlantic Ocean?

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 7:41:23 AM
Quote
Joran at this point has nothing to lose, he can only win if the prosecution does not come up with new evidence witness etc. he will walk
T/W have a lot to loose - know nothing yet, very frustrated, it was said between the lines already, they are looking for something to stick to any of the suspects....
that's why leaks, wild accusations are flying all over, staring down contest, belts ....like all here associations with a certain picture....
sneakers, someone playing tennis with big feet...
gardener - btw, in a local paper it was said the gardener actually worked for the raquet club, he knew Joran probably from sight very well, perhaps he got the dates mixed up and his employers will also have to take the rap, Jossy could give him protection if it was the real deal ....

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 8:49:59 AM
Quote
iremember, eurotrash would be something a bit different, if you would be open minded you could really see that.
this is the tragical part of the whole thing, actually Natalee and Joran are from the same stratosphere, if you can compare upper middle class from the US with upper middleclass from Europe
both had finished high school - some people suggest that Joran, only going to St. Leo's, was of a lesser academic quality - who can tell?
but my experience on the islands tells me, not bad at all, not bad at all -how many kids from the island to you think get a scholarship for athletics - give me a ball park figure?

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 8:57:49 AM
Quote
As I recall the belt picture was taken on a school trip? Horsing around, but leakers read the blogs too and they want the fuel going - you know the moment a belt appears, dog or otherwise people will remember the picture.
the other side has countered with the witness sleeping at Joran's - playing the pink card
Guess what the next move will be?


Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 9:14:42 AM

Quote
professor: it would look so much better, if a known "drug dealer" was involved, instead of 3 fools - it leaves room for kidnapping theory and carving out theory and blackmail theory - parents are know distributing poster to south america in the hope for answers - still in denial

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 9:45:45 AM

blacklable had lots of wisdom to share.  IMHO, he seems to identify some of the early rumors and why...
Quote
DennisAOK, even if you think differently, I am not here to defend Joran, but I know that the standard of the AHighschool is maintained because otherwise they would not have any students by the price they are charging - in US you have this test what is it called SAte? they have to do that also -
trash has indeed nothing to do with income, but intellect has no standing/status in Aruba, only hard cash, if only 10% of the population has a high school degree (dutch or otherwise) and if only 1% of the population has an academic background it goes without saying that being not an academic is the norm and being an academic you are playing that down as much as you can, otherwise you do not fit

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 9:21:39 AM
Quote
according to beth: drug dealer (cab driver), fill in what you like walked away with Natalee, but then Joran admits first night to sexually assault Natalee - this does not go together, if you really think about it

Posted by: blacklable | Aug 12, 2005 9:55:39 AM
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:36:52 PM
Hmmmm, cause I thought Cheney stayed on Venzula and Air Force II landed in Aruba..................................
Cheney was NOT on Venezuela either. Tensions were high as Venezuela was mounting troops on the border of Columbia that weekend. Airforce 2 was there filled with State Department/CIA operatives to monitor the situation.

Yep, I remember that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 09:37:04 PM
The Fish Trap

Caps explained the fish trap to us one night.  It is a large commercial size.  He referred to it as a "post office" and it stayed there in that spot.  Drug dealers from Colombia brought heroine and cocaine to the fish trap and deposited it.  Aruban dealers then picked up the drugs and moved them to Holland.  In return, the dealers in Holland sent ecstacy back to Aruba.  The ecstacy was put in the "post office" where it was then picked up by the Colombians.
Really, how do you know that???




Caps explained the cage to us many times.  It's over in Shango.  His most recent post about the heroine and ecstacy in the cage was in the thread before the one we just finished.  It's in the last 5 or 6 pages.  According to Caps there was a large drug transfer going down at the same time that Natalee met her demise.  Some of the group at the Matty Apts. were also involved in a drug transfer that same night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 09:37:28 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.180

Diario Newspaper March 1st 2008
Air force 2 owing to descend at aruba ... maximum security at airports
 saturday, 01 march 2008 oranjestad (aan):

Last aeropuerto of aruba was have extra security hour cu air force 2, one c-boeing 32 owing to descend. For of nightfall end was talk of the arrival of the plane here at aruba, which is esun ordinarily using for transport of the vice president of markets. Polisnan owing to being notifies for extra surveillance of airport rond. So cu owing to the plane descend 9'or of diabierna one night quantity of equipment owing to send for being give pabao attendance at the part where the plane owing to staciona. Was talk cu dick cheney will is there of the plane cu all his own safety cu owing to achieve autorizacion for march arm at aruba. Esnan cu owing to arrive there will bandona aruba monday morning.

Saturday morning will actuate the plane for one more part pabao close of caserne of bombero because airport is druk and the plane is coy much space. The part which is close cu plane is using for bay runway will let the air force 2 stop. On the photograph here can see more of the plane just past hour cu owing to descend at end of aruba.

http://news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1267&Itemid=30
The speculation in Aruba (and here at SM) was that Cheney was on board. Monkeys checked it out and Cheney was in Washington. We were HOPING that Cheney and Air Force 2 was there to bring Natalee home (via a "Diplomatic pouch"). Unfortunately, the plane was there (as I mentioned above) to monitor the feuding between Venezuela and Columbia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
O.K. My opinion only is the trap being found in the ocean was it was planted there to cover up the REAL reason for the ocean floor mapping.  I think that story was put out there (possibly by Jossy) to cover for the real reason the Persistence was there.  How convenient when it was all cleaned out they up and hi-tailed it out of there.  I don't believe this was a trip to find Natalee but a trip to map the ocean for a pipeline.  Who paid for it?  I don't know but this all had something to do with Venezuela and Chavez and the FARC kidnappings.  It was just convenient that Natalee was missing in the area and this was probably sanctioned by our own government. Anything less  and the Aruban government WOULD NEVER have allowed them to be within site of their shores.  I think Aruba bribe the US by saying they can search for Natalee but the maps they did of the ocean HAD to be turned over to them.  Mission accomplished.  IF that was Natalee in that cage then no one and I repeat no one in Aruba ever believed she was in that ocean and were probably as shocked as Tim Miller was when he viewed the monitor and said It Looks Like a Skull.

JMO

I think that Kyle was too good at his job.  They never expected him to
locate a trap with human remains inside.  When he did, they had to do
something about the problem and intended to just cover it up, but Robin
had posted the pictures on the internet....oops!

 Magnolia, you are a right good thinker, as well as a cook!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 09:39:16 PM
Hmmmm, cause I thought Cheney stayed on Venzula and Air Force II landed in Aruba..................................
Cheney was NOT on Venezuela either. Tensions were high as Venezuela was mounting troops on the border of Columbia that weekend. Airforce 2 was there filled with State Department/CIA operatives to monitor the situation.

Yep, I remember that.








If I recall, Destiny even called the White House to find out if he was in Washington that weekend.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 09:40:33 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle
::MonkeyHaHa:: I prefer Cigars too!!! (hope you aren't "Monica" )


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:43:05 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle
::MonkeyHaHa:: I prefer Cigars too!!! (hope you aren't "Monica" )

Who's Monica?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:43:41 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle
::MonkeyHaHa:: I prefer Cigars too!!! (hope you aren't "Monica" )

Who's Monica?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:45:04 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle
::MonkeyHaHa:: I prefer Cigars too!!! (hope you aren't "Monica" )

Who's Monica?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Come on. Tell me who's Monica so that I can laugh too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:46:03 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle
::MonkeyHaHa:: I prefer Cigars too!!! (hope you aren't "Monica" )

Who's Monica?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Come on. Tell me who's Monica so that I can laugh too.
Monica Lewinksky, of the White House, with the Pres.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:48:08 PM
Cheney was NOT on Aruba -- only the plane "normally" used as Airforce 2. (It's identical to Airforce 1 for that matter). Cheney was in Washington that weekend. For all you cooking up a conspiracy with Cheney, Haliburton, and Silvetti are smoking crack.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hey Wreck, About crack, I prefer cigars!!!!!!!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I've been reading and reading and now I'm more confused then ever. Caps and Kermit have great info. but how do we KNOW what's the TRUTH? Can someone answer?

Cajun Miracle
::MonkeyHaHa:: I prefer Cigars too!!! (hope you aren't "Monica" )

Who's Monica?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Come on. Tell me who's Monica so that I can laugh too.
Monica Lewinksky, of the White House, with the Pres.


Ah Sh@t! That IS too funny. NO I'm not Monica.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 09:49:31 PM
There is speculation the the radar "wasn't working" or was "intentionally turned off" that night because a large drug transfer was planned.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:50:25 PM
There is speculation the the radar "wasn't working" or was "intentionally turned off" that night because a large drug transfer was planned.
Yep, birds on the wire.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:50:52 PM
Hey, I read Magnolia's post at the end of the last thread. Kermit came on this thread and made the coment that she almost has it right. What do all of you think?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 09:51:30 PM
From reading bits and pieces of news from Aruba over three years...

American military have been to Aruba for leave.  I recall some news articles and pictures.

American and Dutch had some kind of joint exercises.

I find it hard to believe that NO ONE has mapped the water around Aruba before Persistence.  It's odd that the Dutch F-16 flyover came so late in the search for Natalee.  I've wondered if that F-16 search was planned prior to Natalee's disappearance, and her search was used as a cover for some Dutch military action.  Has any American seen the search results?  Maybe it's public record?  Part of the NH case file?

Oduber has been a friend to Hugo.  It seems like it would have been a small thing for the Dutch/Arubans to search their own water around Aruba before Persistence.  IIRC, lots of equipment in house.  Like the search dogs, for some reason no search equipment was available to look for Natalee.

If there was something sinister to Persistence searching, the Dutch/Arubans had many many opportunities to step up to the plate and make a good faith effort at searching.  They did not.

jmho

Persistence crew are heros.   ::cartwheel::

I stand with the girl.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:51:58 PM
Well, I will go fold clothes (women's work) and call a friend of mine who is FBI, now head of security over all NFL Games. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:53:59 PM
There is speculation the the radar "wasn't working" or was "intentionally turned off" that night because a large drug transfer was planned.
Yep, birds on the wire.

Always, I like your avi but miss that awesome black cat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 09:55:50 PM
There is speculation the the radar "wasn't working" or was "intentionally turned off" that night because a large drug transfer was planned.
Yep, birds on the wire.

Always, I like your avi but miss that awesome black cat.
|thank you,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 09:59:15 PM
Hey Klaas. Our post numbers are not changing. Didn't know if you needed this info.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:02:16 PM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!






   



I have a question...are you saying that John Silvetti was involved in a cover up of the evidence contained within the cage that was located at the bottom of the ocean and that others of which I won't name at this time was part of this cover up? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 10:02:39 PM
Quote
I have to give credit to Jossy Mansur of Diario who has stated from day one that if it were up to him, the whole investigation should have been handed over to the FBI. Jossy has been very critical of the investigation, in particular the judges who decided to release the Kalpoe brothers. Yes, he comes from a powerful family but he does have the guts to call out what is right and what is wrong. In case you haven't noticed; Jossy is not a Holland basher; however, he has always kept the Dutch Elitists on the island in check. This is not the first time.

Posted by: Blackie Lawless | July 24, 2005 01:55 PM

Quote
Anna-- not to get off topic but Jossy does NOT own one third of the island. His main source of income is his newspaper and he also has a stake in the family business. He does have a couple of brothers, one in particular, who have some serious wealth. Jossy was always the outsider in the Mansur family going all the way back to the seventies. As a matter of fact, he was considered the poor one but he proved himself and made it on his own with his newsaper Diario. He was on the board of directors of Interbank during the 1980's but that bank has since been sold. I can't speak for other members of his family but Jossy has nothing to do with organized crime, but he is quick to point out organized crime figures and drug runners in his editorials. He has enemies. The motto of his newspaper is that the truth has never harmed anyone.

Posted by: Blackie Lawless | July 24, 2005 02:58 PM

Quote
granny the idea that Joran said she was buried on the beach is coming from Jossy Mansur.

Posted by: hardyandtiny | July 24, 2005 10:16 AM

When did ALE finally dig up the beach?  Years?

Quote
granny the idea that Joran said she was buried on the beach is coming from Jossy Mansur.

Umm not only him but the f.bi.and its on the transcripts..Everything you read was true..He was supposed to lead them to where the body was...But PVDS stepped in and everything changed..

Posted by: ******* | July 24, 2005 10:39 AM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 10:04:49 PM
2NJ that page fulla hooey is SO bad it has Beth at the school with posters when that was Jug and his friends. Beth at that time was at the polis station viewing the security video that Paul was busy at ISA lying to say the video films were broken, that's why Joran wasn't seen on them.

No I'm not joking one bit.

OK Wreck - me and the cesspool.  Don't know if you recall Blacklable, the kids called him Blackie, he'd stay up nights chatting at RWV even after he went over to Curacao, gave me the cesspool idea. And it's not a bad one, overall. What cesspool was to me though is more an icon, about all the places Aruba refused to search and would not allow to be searched.

Brains searching out patterns - it sure didn't take me long to figure out I could read Papiamento
 

I didn't mean to imply you were joking....I understood all of it....the last sentence in your post was the clincher.  Sorry, I've had to be away for a while.

Quote
Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:06:24 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 10:09:07 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:
Got you covered!!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 10:09:09 PM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!






   



I have a question...are you saying that John Silvetti was involved in a cover up of the evidence contained within the cage that was located at the bottom of the ocean and that others of which I won't name at this time was part of this cover up? 

I can't tell if you are asking me or Kermit.....but, as for me that is exactly
what I think.  I think at least a part of Natalee was in that cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:10:02 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:

You need to find Klaas' "beating a dead horse cartoon".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 10:10:37 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:
sorry, Lala's, hard to type while Im getting  my butt kicked.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:11:14 PM
Hey, I read Magnolia's post at the end of the last thread. Kermit came on this thread and made the coment that she almost has it right. What do all of you think?

Speculation without proof is still speculation.  I am waiting for the proof. Sorry...that's how I am...only Shango gets my attention without proof.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:11:41 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:
sorry, Lala's, hard to type while Im getting  my butt kicked.....

I understand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:12:14 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:

You need to find Klaas' "beating a dead horse cartoon".

I am about to stop beating that horse, because it does no good. LOL 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:15:28 PM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!






   



I have a question...are you saying that John Silvetti was involved in a cover up of the evidence contained within the cage that was located at the bottom of the ocean and that others of which I won't name at this time was part of this cover up? 

I can't tell if you are asking me or Kermit.....but, as for me that is exactly
what I think.  I think at least a part of Natalee was in that cage.


Really tryin to grasp this cover-up thing in the ocean??I may be slow.LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:16:03 PM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!






   



I have a question...are you saying that John Silvetti was involved in a cover up of the evidence contained within the cage that was located at the bottom of the ocean and that others of which I won't name at this time was part of this cover up? 

I can't tell if you are asking me or Kermit.....but, as for me that is exactly
what I think.  I think at least a part of Natalee was in that cage.

Well, I meant Kermit..but you honestly think that John Silvetti was part of some scheme to cover up the contents of the cage?   John Silvetti?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:17:51 PM
Are you people saying that John Silvetti was actively working with ALE to cover up what was in that cage and that it was Natalee in that cage?  Is that what is being touted in all this confusion? 


John Silvetti
ALE
Mos

All working together???  Are you people serious?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 10:18:54 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:




You're not alone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:19:14 PM
If my memory seves me at all, when TM stated he thought that was a skull in the cage, the search ended.  Hence, coverup????   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:19:48 PM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!






   



I have a question...are you saying that John Silvetti was involved in a cover up of the evidence contained within the cage that was located at the bottom of the ocean and that others of which I won't name at this time was part of this cover up? 

I can't tell if you are asking me or Kermit.....but, as for me that is exactly
what I think.  I think at least a part of Natalee was in that cage.

and you think that Silvetti and others of his team were involved in the "cover up"?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:20:15 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:

I agree Lala's. We had found this out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 10:20:43 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:




You're not alone.

(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?s=c07b71c26b4d4113baae3ede7946c50f&attachmentid=55073&stc=1&d=1142459373)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:21:06 PM
Are you people saying that John Silvetti was actively working with ALE to cover up what was in that cage and that it was Natalee in that cage?  Is that what is being touted in all this confusion? 


John Silvetti
ALE
Mos

All working together???  Are you people serious?

Me personally.That's what i'm trying to understand!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 10:22:00 PM
Quote
I was looking into some disturbing thigs about the racial tensions on the island. All is NOT as happy as it seems. Van DerStraaten and Van derSloot both propose to be environmentalists :(. Follow the money... Van derStraaten has made some investment in Aruba's environmentally friendly ca$sinos (rumor is it is in other family members names until after he retires). The oil refinery which hires many of the native islanders on the the 'bad' side of the island, where nothing is maintained and tourists rarely travel due to the stinch of the landfill nearby.

It is said that the dutch and expats live on the west and north end while the blacks lives on the south and east end. They do not attend the same schools and there is a very distinct class difference. The black islanders are taught to treat all tourists and especially lighter skinned people with honor. The lighter the skin, the better the treatment.

I really do not know. That any of this is true. Just repeating what is being said in small circles.

I do have a question. How many black tourists does Aruba get? Is this a reasonable path to pursue?

Posted by: Island Hopper | Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 01:44 AM


Follow the money.  Maybe some do not want additional water searches...it's bad for the casino business.  Scares the tourists away.  Who knows what lurks in the water around Aruba?

How much do the key players in the NH case have invested in casinos?  Timeshares?  Condos?

I remember that speculation in other places to.

What would investors be willing to do to get tourists back?  Get the money flowing through casinos?

Is the money on the island in oil refinery?  The US in on the road to oil independence in 10 years.  What interest does the US have in oil around Aruba?

Who would have such an interest?  China?  China has the contracts in Iraq.  China has the contracts and oil fields in Darfur. 

China in Aruba next?  Weren't the Chinese investigating Aruba for 'tourism' a year or so ago?  Maybe they were really looking for oil?  Isn't China in Cuba too?

Or casinos?  Money laundering?  Drugs?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:22:20 PM
If my memory seves me at all, when TM stated he thought that was a skull in the cage, the search ended.  Hence, coverup????   


 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:23:35 PM
I think it was confirmed that Cheney's plane was only on Aruba and not the Vice President himself.  Why do I even bother...no one is listening to me anyway? :roll:




You're not alone.

There you go.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

(http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/attachment.php?s=c07b71c26b4d4113baae3ede7946c50f&attachmentid=55073&stc=1&d=1142459373)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 10:23:53 PM
(http://ui31.gamespot.com/1214/deadhorsebeat_2.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:24:19 PM
I DO think that it was a skull and possibly Natalee. So, what happened to it and the shoe? Also, what was tested by FBI besides the denim? Shouldn't we know by now? I WANT TO KNOW!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:24:35 PM
Are you people saying that John Silvetti was actively working with ALE to cover up what was in that cage and that it was Natalee in that cage?  Is that what is being touted in all this confusion? 


John Silvetti
ALE
Mos

All working together???  Are you people serious?

No, I do not believe Silvetti was involved, but you do...correct?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:46 PM
If my memory seves me at all, when TM stated he thought that was a skull in the cage, the search ended.  Hence, coverup????   


 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Ok, that was my understanding.  Straighten me out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:25:03 PM
Let me get this straight....John Silvetti and the crew of the Perisitence were involved in a cover up of magnitude proportions concerning the contents of the cage?  Silvetti was working in cooperation with Mos and ALE to make this happen because it really was Natalee in the cage?   

This is actually what some of you believe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:26:11 PM
If my memory seves me at all, when TM stated he thought that was a skull in the cage, the search ended.  Hence, coverup????   


 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Ok, that was my understanding.  Straighten me out.

Are you talking about when K went ashore from the boat and maybe something went on to cover up while he was gone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 10:26:46 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:26:58 PM
Are you people saying that John Silvetti was actively working with ALE to cover up what was in that cage and that it was Natalee in that cage?  Is that what is being touted in all this confusion? 


John Silvetti
ALE
Mos

All working together???  Are you people serious?

No, I do not believe Silvetti was involved, but you do...correct?


No!!  I am asking if that is what Kermit is saying. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 10:28:15 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 10:28:53 PM
Quote
I got a laugh out of Jossy's comment, "Why F-16's, are we under attack?" How can these plans find anything with so many tourists walking along the beaches and other places?

On people's comments about high school grads taking these trips...I don't see it. My how times have changed. People must have more money than they know what to do with...or parents are way to lax and allow the kids to do whatever they want.

What's wrong with having a party after graduation, and going home?

Posted by: Moosetracks | Jul 5, 2005 8:24:31 AM

Good question Jossy.  

What did the maps the F-16 made of the ocean look like?  

If the Dutch had maps, I wonder why they were so anxious to get the ones the Americans were making?  Didn't the F-16's share?

Follow the money.  The Dutch had the maps all along!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:30:29 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 21, 2008, 10:31:01 PM
The Fish Trap

Caps explained the fish trap to us one night.  It is a large commercial size.  He referred to it as a "post office" and it stayed there in that spot.  Drug dealers from Colombia brought heroine and cocaine to the fish trap and deposited it.  Aruban dealers then picked up the drugs and moved them to Holland.  In return, the dealers in Holland sent ecstacy back to Aruba.  The ecstacy was put in the "post office" where it was then picked up by the Colombians.
Really, how do you know that???


Caps explained the cage to us many times.  It's over in Shango.  His most recent post about the heroine and ecstacy in the cage was in the thread before the one we just finished.  It's in the last 5 or 6 pages.  According to Caps there was a large drug transfer going down at the same time that Natalee met her demise.  Some of the group at the Matty Apts. were also involved in a drug transfer that same night.

About the alleged drug transfer going on that night...

- Wasn't Steve Croes sleeping in a boat just outside the H.I. the night Nat went missing (Tattoo shuttle boat)? What is he, some sort of cage monitor?

- Didn't H.I. security guards mention two guys walking on the beach and that they were never seen again?

- Didn't H.I. security guards say that some MBers were swimming in the ocean outside the H.I. until the early morning hours?

- Weren't there fishermen who said they saw nobody on the beach at all that night?

- Wasn't there a fisherman who said he saw a man carry a woman into the ocean that night?

- Wasn't there a rumour in the very beginning that a boat was missinng? 

What else happened in the beach/water that we have read about? (That's all I can recall).

   



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 21, 2008, 10:31:25 PM
Let me get this straight....John Silvetti and the crew of the Perisitence were involved in a cover up of magnitude proportions concerning the contents of the cage?  Silvetti was working in cooperation with Mos and ALE to make this happen because it really was Natalee in the cage?   

This is actually what some of you believe?

NOT ME.  I don't for one minute believe that...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 10:33:25 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.
Who said they used the call letters "Air force 2"??? They did not. They used the same plane as "Air Force 2" -- but if the Vice- president is not on board - it is not called "Air force 2" by Traffic Controllers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:33:42 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 21, 2008, 10:34:17 PM
whiskeygirl:
Quote
The comment she made about the videoclip

What videoclip?  Do we know?
Maybe the ARU-BAY videos???  Wouldn't that be cool?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:36:39 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:36:55 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.
Who said they used the call letters "Air force 2"??? They did not. They used the same plane as "Air Force 2" -- but if the Vice- president is not on board - it is not called "Air force 2" by Traffic Controllers.


Dead horse...baby...dead horse!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 10:37:33 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......




But if people of importance on the island are involved and government officals turn a blind eye, Aruban drug dealers don't have to be as creative as they are in the US.  "The bird left the wire" and the radar was turned off so the transaction would not be recorded by radar.  Aruba is noted for drug smuggling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:38:01 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

Please tell me how you test the demin in relation to Natalee's skirt if there is no skirt to test?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:38:11 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.
Who said they used the call letters "Air force 2"??? They did not. They used the same plane as "Air Force 2" -- but if the Vice- president is not on board - it is not called "Air force 2" by Traffic Controllers.

I used it in a earlier post.Believe i read it in a Diario article.Please correct me if i'm wrong!

http://www.news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1267&Itemid=30


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:39:02 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

That does not make any sense.  The skirt was denim, the blouse was not denim, but a more sheer material.   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:39:21 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: hotping on November 21, 2008, 10:39:36 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?
Good Questions.....I like the way You think Cajun Miracle!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 10:40:21 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......



I lived in Seattle for a while - up on the plateau.  I wouldn't go into that cold Puget Sound for any reason.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:41:03 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.


The announced to the world they were looking for Natalee and yet they were surprised to find her????  No real mission???  I am absolutely astounded at some of these comments...not yours in particular...just some of them. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:41:20 PM
Don't know this but I wonder if you can obtain DNA from material that had been in the water?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: kpg on November 21, 2008, 10:41:37 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO




Thank you  and Lalas for bringing the conversation back to reality.

The key word is denim.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:42:26 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

Please tell me how you test the demin in relation to Natalee's skirt if there is no skirt to test?
where did they get the blouse fabric to test? same thing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:44:10 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......



I lived in Seattle for a while - up on the plateau.  I wouldn't go into that cold Puget Sound for any reason.

Up towards the San Juan islands and a little more North.Some great scuba diving from what i hear.Plateau.meaning "Issaquah"???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:44:15 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:45:11 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?
Good Questions.....I like the way You think Cajun Miracle!

It's been almost 1 year and we still haven't heard what was tested or the outcome of the testing. (Besides the denim) Even Kyle said this week, that he would not comment. Are they waiting to catch more people before commenting?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:46:16 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

No Kyle would not lie. mho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 10:46:24 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?
I don't, I think he was sent ashore in order to make a few nonchalant adjustments


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 10:46:29 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......



I lived in Seattle for a while - up on the plateau.  I wouldn't go into that cold Puget Sound for any reason.

Up towards the San Juan islands and a little more North.Some great scuba diving from what i hear.Plateau.meaning "Issaquah"???



Heritage Hills which is a little closer to Redmond.  It was next to Sahalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 10:49:09 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

No Kyle would not lie. mho

Kyle is not the person that let the ziplock story slip out...it was Private Eye.  Kyle never said anything other than he would discuss it off the forum with Private Eye.  We were not privy to the rest of the story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 10:49:32 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

Why would PI bring up zip locks? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:49:37 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......



I lived in Seattle for a while - up on the plateau.  I wouldn't go into that cold Puget Sound for any reason.

Up towards the San Juan islands and a little more North.Some great scuba diving from what i hear.Plateau.meaning "Issaquah"???



Heritage Hills which is a little closer to Redmond.  It was next to Sahalee.

Lake sammamish area!Beautiful area.Back to Justice for Natalee.Pleasure to meet you SS. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 10:51:14 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.
Who said they used the call letters "Air force 2"??? They did not. They used the same plane as "Air Force 2" -- but if the Vice- president is not on board - it is not called "Air force 2" by Traffic Controllers.

I used it in a earlier post.Believe i read it in a Diario article.Please correct me if i'm wrong!

http://www.news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1267&Itemid=30
Quite simply, the Aruban paper was wrong. They ASSUMED it was "Air Force 2" because it was the the same plane as "Air Force 2". Same plane -- just not the VP on board.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:51:26 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?
Good Questions.....I like the way You think Cajun Miracle!

It's been almost 1 year and we still haven't heard what was tested or the outcome of the testing. (Besides the denim) Even Kyle said this week, that he would not comment. Are they waiting to catch more people before commenting?

So they tested the DENIUM to see if it matched her blouse that was not made of denium.   Kyles comment was MOS was accurate in that the FBI testing did not match the blouse, and I believe a like blouse was provided by Beth.  I am not stating this the way my mind see's it.  Kyle is not involved in the cover up at all. IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 10:51:34 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

Please tell me how you test the demin in relation to Natalee's skirt if there is no skirt to test?
where did they get the blouse fabric to test? same thing.



Beth went and bought identical shirt and skirt right after
Natalee's disappearence and turned those items over to
the  FBI to use for future testing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 21, 2008, 10:52:19 PM
Lala's, how would you interpret the lover frog's post at http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.580  Reply 594?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:53:34 PM
OK This is just my opinion. After Tim left so suddenly and the Peter tapes were shown, Beth seemed more at peace. That is another reason that I think that something of Natalee's was found and tested. Why these results have never been reported, I have no idea since it has been almost 1 year. I still feel that the skull was brought back to the US and tested, so that Aruba wouldn't have control over it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:54:10 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

Please tell me how you test the demin in relation to Natalee's skirt if there is no skirt to test?
where did they get the blouse fabric to test? same thing.



Beth went and bought identical shirt and skirt right after
Natalee's disappearence and turned those items over to
the  FBI to use for future testing.

correct, but the results only are for the match to the blouse!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:54:17 PM
John Silvetti.....I think that they had no idea that they would
find Natalee.  That was not the real mission.  There was nothing
to do but cover it up because of the govts' involvement.
As you said it is all just speculation on my part.
I am almost sure that unless Cheney is on the plane, they
have to use another call sign.
Who said they used the call letters "Air force 2"??? They did not. They used the same plane as "Air Force 2" -- but if the Vice- president is not on board - it is not called "Air force 2" by Traffic Controllers.

I used it in a earlier post.Believe i read it in a Diario article.Please correct me if i'm wrong!

http://www.news.diario-aruba.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1267&Itemid=30
Quite simply, the Aruban paper was wrong. They ASSUMED it was "Air Force 2" because it was the the same plane as "Air Force 2". Same plane -- just not the VP on board.

Thanx for the clarification.Wasn't tryin to insinuate Cheney was on that plane!Was also clarifying that Cheney can't deal with his halliburton stuff while his tenure as VP is still going...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 10:54:56 PM
The fish cage was used for drug transfers.



They must be old school drug smugglers.Up here in the Northwest,as well as British Columbia the BIG Marijuana growers take there shipment's of Marijuana out deep into the waters of the puget sound,as well as the pacific.They drop their shipments down with a GPS,as well as timed Air-balloons to surface at the appropriate times for pick-up.Just sayin......



I lived in Seattle for a while - up on the plateau.  I wouldn't go into that cold Puget Sound for any reason.

Up towards the San Juan islands and a little more North.Some great scuba diving from what i hear.Plateau.meaning "Issaquah"???



Heritage Hills which is a little closer to Redmond.  It was next to Sahalee.

Lake sammamish area!Beautiful area.Back to Justice for Natalee.Pleasure to meet you SS. ::MonkeyWink::


Thanks!  I'm on the opposite coast now. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: sharon on November 21, 2008, 10:55:07 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

Why would PI bring up zip locks? 

Excellent question!


Goodnight monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2008, 10:55:28 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:55:34 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 10:56:45 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

Please tell me how you test the demin in relation to Natalee's skirt if there is no skirt to test?
where did they get the blouse fabric to test? same thing.



Beth went and bought identical shirt and skirt right after
Natalee's disappearence and turned those items over to
the  FBI to use for future testing.

correct, but the results only are for the match to the blouse!!

I should have said the only results released were for a match to the blouse  ..as released by MOS. Kyle agreed those released statements were correct, but no other test results were released, nor noted. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 10:57:45 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: kpg on November 21, 2008, 10:58:59 PM



Denim


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 10:59:03 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Whick would work? Offer Kermit some treats or threaten to fry his legs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 11:01:05 PM
joran is going on live with Greta Monday.  Why wait till Monday??????????
 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 21, 2008, 11:01:53 PM



Denim

thank you for the spelling lesson.  geeze


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:02:21 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::

Sh!!t, she showed an interview with Urine and that's what Monday will be about. I can't believe she would believe anything that he says. I hope that I'm wrong but this doesn't look like it will solve anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 11:02:50 PM
It seems like Joran is saying the police are not going to help so he may as well.   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 11:03:33 PM
OK This is just my opinion. After Tim left so suddenly and the Peter tapes were shown, Beth seemed more at peace. That is another reason that I think that something of Natalee's was found and tested. Why these results have never been reported, I have no idea since it has been almost 1 year. I still feel that the skull was brought back to the US and tested, so that Aruba wouldn't have control over it.
That has been my belief as well. But the longer we have gone without it being made public has me questioning it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 21, 2008, 11:04:26 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Excellent Post.  This mirrors my thoughts exactly.  I have brought this up many times and no one seems to even want to think about it.  I do not know the searches personally so I can not make a personal character judgement about them.  I do agree that giving of your time and effort to search for someone is very selfless.  I have tried to follow the leads that Kermit has given us because it makes sense to me.  I have another question,  where did the money come from for this search?  Silvetti and Luis Schaefer were both in financial trouble at this time and I do not believe they had this kind of money to donate?!?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:04:35 PM
It seems like Joran is saying the police are not going to help so he may as well.   ::MonkeyShocked::

Yep Mariloo. This may be anoth crock of ____! I'm pissed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: kpg on November 21, 2008, 11:05:15 PM



no spelling leson sunny.


Denom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 11:05:28 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Whick would work? Offer Kermit some treats or threaten to fry his legs.

He likes San's treats! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 11:05:43 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::

Sh!!t, she showed an interview with Urine and that's what Monday will be about. I can't believe she would believe anything that he says. I hope that I'm wrong but this doesn't look like it will solve anything.

Greta better hope she has something of some value or many people will be even more disgusted with her!I'll keepthefaith until proven otherwise.I've been proven otherwise in the past but never will lose Faith that everyone's prayer's will be answered in time.WOULD LIKE IT A LITTLE SOONER THEN LATER LORD...PLEASEEEE ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 11:07:04 PM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

Why would PI bring up zip locks? 

I can't tell you or I will have to kill you. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 11:07:54 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: kpg on November 21, 2008, 11:08:38 PM


Greta has Joran on tape.

However when joran speaks he lies.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 11:09:59 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::

Sh!!t, she showed an interview with Urine and that's what Monday will be about. I can't believe she would believe anything that he says. I hope that I'm wrong but this doesn't look like it will solve anything.
Joran is going to be on her show, live??????  Well then, problem solved, I will just call and and ask him to tell me the whole story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 21, 2008, 11:10:00 PM
Halliburton being brought up again, tonight, I tried to find the old Valero website, but much is gone....I do know that one rep was there at the time Natalee disappeared....not saying he was involved, personally, but it was something I had researched early.


http://www.valero.com/NewsRoom/BoD/02-Bradford.htm


(http://www.valero.com/NR/rdonlyres/D9109B5B-1A72-49CE-BB00-6F8F682CD6F6/0/bradford.jpg)

 retired Chairman of Halliburton Company


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 11:10:37 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::

Sh!!t, she showed an interview with Urine and that's what Monday will be about. I can't believe she would believe anything that he says. I hope that I'm wrong but this doesn't look like it will solve anything.

Greta better hope she has something of some value or many people will be even more disgusted with her!I'll keepthefaith until proven otherwise.I've been proven otherwise in the past but never will lose Faith that everyone's prayer's will be answered in time.WOULD LIKE IT A LITTLE SOONER THEN LATER LORD...PLEASEEEE ::MonkeyCool::
Greta had Beth on the other night. Greta said to Beth: 'I have kept you informed since June about our investigation' --- Beth seemed pleased.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: kpg on November 21, 2008, 11:10:52 PM


I am not correcting spelling.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2008, 11:11:32 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Whick would work? Offer Kermit some treats or threaten to fry his legs.

Treats definitely!  I'll be shopping for some later!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 11:12:00 PM
It seems like Joran is saying the police are not going to help so he may as well.   ::MonkeyShocked::

Yep Mariloo. This may be anoth crock of ____! I'm pissed!

Don't wory, Greta is giving him enough rope to hang himself with.  I want to hear what he has to say.  I wonder who he will blame next.  He will come clean one day and it may be Monday and I hope and pray it is.  Aruba are saying they have seen her information and talked to a witness earlier (March) and discounted but I don't trust them as much anymore than I trust Joran.  He will give up a clue oneday we can prove and then we can hang him.  If I seem cruel, I believe in an eye for an eye.  I just want to see justice done for Natalee.  God bless her poor family to have to put up with all this for so man years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 11:12:05 PM
Halliburton being brought up again, tonight, I tried to find the old Valero website, but much is gone....I do know that one rep was there at the time Natalee disappeared....not saying he was involved, personally, but it was something I had researched early.


http://www.valero.com/NewsRoom/BoD/02-Bradford.htm


(http://www.valero.com/NR/rdonlyres/D9109B5B-1A72-49CE-BB00-6F8F682CD6F6/0/bradford.jpg)

 retired Chairman of Halliburton Company
Oh, Bless you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 11:12:06 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::

Sh!!t, she showed an interview with Urine and that's what Monday will be about. I can't believe she would believe anything that he says. I hope that I'm wrong but this doesn't look like it will solve anything.
Joran is going to be on her show, live??????  Well then, problem solved, I will just call and and ask him to tell me the whole story.

This better be good to give this Urine time on TV.Period....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:12:33 PM
OK This is just my opinion. After Tim left so suddenly and the Peter tapes were shown, Beth seemed more at peace. That is another reason that I think that something of Natalee's was found and tested. Why these results have never been reported, I have no idea since it has been almost 1 year. I still feel that the skull was brought back to the US and tested, so that Aruba wouldn't have control over it.
That has been my belief as well. But the longer we have gone without it being made public has me questioning it.

But, what if they haven't caught all of the ones that are involved. I really don't know anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 11:14:18 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 
Natalee was NOT put in the trap by "the boys." She was put there by a "bigger boat" days/weeks later.

I will repost my theory from February '08 again:



Quote from: wreck on Today at 03:20:36 PM
I'm going to dig a bigger hole for myself as I think few are following what I'm saying.
1) The Persistence in all likelihood has found Natalee in the trap.
2) They really did not want to expose this just yet. Why? Because they still need to "prove"
the "whys" and "hows". They have a better chance of accomplishing this if the actual "perps"
aren't "clued in."
3) Why the "Dateline" irregularities? Because "Dateline" was already on board and they had to
 keep up "appearances" so they could continue with their "plan."
4) The posting of the pics on the internet put a severe cramp in their plans.
5) Why is trap so big? Because the body disposal did not happen that night as in Joran's story.
 Her body was put there at least a few days later by a bigger boat involving a larger cover-up.
This why they did not reveal their "finding" yet. They want to find out who has that bigger boat.

Once again -- my opinion.

We have waited 3 years -- hold on -- we're almost there!


~~~~~~ (Ocean Explorer:
I also pray that you are right!  Wreck, I like the way you think. 
Wreck, then what are your thoughts on Mos's press release about the FBI results?

Don't know - don't care what Mos says or does. I trusted him up until Thanksgiving time. Never again.

trainwreck .gif =  (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/trainwreck.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 11:14:36 PM
Greta has info. coming up NOW about Urine.

Please post a summary as i'm not in front of a TV Cajun.Thanx! ::MonkeyWink::

Sh!!t, she showed an interview with Urine and that's what Monday will be about. I can't believe she would believe anything that he says. I hope that I'm wrong but this doesn't look like it will solve anything.

Greta better hope she has something of some value or many people will be even more disgusted with her!I'll keepthefaith until proven otherwise.I've been proven otherwise in the past but never will lose Faith that everyone's prayer's will be answered in time.WOULD LIKE IT A LITTLE SOONER THEN LATER LORD...PLEASEEEE ::MonkeyCool::
Greta had Beth on the other night. Greta said to Beth: 'I have kept you informed since June about our investigation' --- Beth seemed pleased.

Will have to watch tonight at 10pm as i'm on the westcoast and stay at the shop till 9!One would think that Greta would not let herself be made a fool of twice..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 21, 2008, 11:14:37 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 

Well, if they can put drugs in that cage, they sure as hell can put a skull, tennis shoe, and knife in there too.  When I asked Kermit about this, he alluded to the fact that "why would you put a tennis shoe in with the skull?  to insure that the evidence points to you and you will not talk!"  He also alluded that Kyle gave the tennis shoe to the FBI.  I asked him how Kyle got the shoe.  His reply was "exactly, he is just a boatman". 


Ok, I'll probably be slammed but that is ok.  I can go get the posts but everytime I do no one listens anyway.  But this convo with Kermit has always bothered me.  Now, with more info give by Kermit, it is making more sense to me.  I did research on the Silvetti Group and Luis Schaefer, both in financial trouble big time.  People do desperate things in desperate times.

I am just saying..........



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 21, 2008, 11:14:45 PM
All I will say is Kermit may think he knows some things, but I fear he is way off base in some of his ideas and I have very good reason to say this.  He is entitled to his opinions just as all of us are.  However, to insinuate that John Silvetti is part of some massive cover up to hide the contents of the cage and that Natalee's remains were in there and not offer anything even if it is speculation that has some merit is more than I can believe.  I dearly love Kermit...but unless he can show me where John Silvetti, Hans Mos, ALE, Schaeffer and the crew of the Perisistence are all in this together along with a few others that I am suspecting Kermit may think is involved...I will not accept it as anything other than speculation.  I would like to know how Dave Holloway feels about a person he and Tim Miller have had a close working relationship with being accused of this.  My opinion of course, but one in which I am entitled to. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2008, 11:15:18 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Excellent Post.  This mirrors my thoughts exactly.  I have brought this up many times and no one seems to even want to think about it.  I do not know the searches personally so I can not make a personal character judgement about them.  I do agree that giving of your time and effort to search for someone is very selfless.  I have tried to follow the leads that Kermit has given us because it makes sense to me.  I have another question,  where did the money come from for this search?  Silvetti and Luis Schaefer were both in financial trouble at this time and I do not believe they had this kind of money to donate?!?



Thanks Kycat, and believe me I've been thinking about it constantly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 11:15:59 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 

JMO....the drug dealers were at the filming at the Matty apts.
They put her in when they dropped the drugs.
I wonder how they do it too.  Somebody must dive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 11:23:22 PM
Shush!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  All the monkeys are thinking!!!!!!!!!! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:23:28 PM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Whick would work? Offer Kermit some treats or threaten to fry his legs.

Treats definitely!  I'll be shopping for some later!   ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks for the help since I'm not great at posting picts. Hope that this works to get more info. He/She sure is a sly one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 11:24:01 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 

JMO....the drug dealers were at the filming at the Matty apts.
They put her in when they dropped the drugs.
I wonder how they do it too.  Somebody must dive.
And they would need a boat with a boom (think JAWS Hahahahah)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:26:45 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 
Natalee was NOT put in the trap by "the boys." She was put there by a "bigger boat" days/weeks later.

I will repost my theory from February '08 again:



Quote from: wreck on Today at 03:20:36 PM
I'm going to dig a bigger hole for myself as I think few are following what I'm saying.
1) The Persistence in all likelihood has found Natalee in the trap.
2) They really did not want to expose this just yet. Why? Because they still need to "prove"
the "whys" and "hows". They have a better chance of accomplishing this if the actual "perps"
aren't "clued in."
3) Why the "Dateline" irregularities? Because "Dateline" was already on board and they had to
 keep up "appearances" so they could continue with their "plan."
4) The posting of the pics on the internet put a severe cramp in their plans.
5) Why is trap so big? Because the body disposal did not happen that night as in Joran's story.
 Her body was put there at least a few days later by a bigger boat involving a larger cover-up.
This why they did not reveal their "finding" yet. They want to find out who has that bigger boat.

Once again -- my opinion.

We have waited 3 years -- hold on -- we're almost there!


~~~~~~ (Ocean Explorer:
I also pray that you are right!  Wreck, I like the way you think. 
Wreck, then what are your thoughts on Mos's press release about the FBI results?

Don't know - don't care what Mos says or does. I trusted him up until Thanksgiving time. Never again.

trainwreck .gif =  (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/trainwreck.gif)


Wreck, I AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 21, 2008, 11:28:04 PM
I am not saying that Silvetti and Schaefer did not want to find Natalee but I do think they were killing two birds with one stone.  They may not have intentionally tried to cover up something?!?  But I truly believe that part of Natalee was in that trap.  Maybe Silvetti sent those pictures to his sister to post so it would screw up the ALE coverup?  Hope so. 

I believe that Natalee is in different places.  The whole thing makes me sick.  I just want Natalee to be brought home and the people responsible to be punished.  If that means asking questions that others think are totally ridiculous or posting unpopular opinions, so be it.  I have no problem with that.  If I am wrong about something I will be the first to admit it and say "sorry".  But it is not about me or us, it IS about Natalee.  All the research, opinions, theories, speculation, and even wild goose chases are what it is all about to get to the bottom of this.

MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 11:28:40 PM
Remember they have to wait for the Babiloians to open the coker.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:29:22 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 

Well, if they can put drugs in that cage, they sure as hell can put a skull, tennis shoe, and knife in there too.  When I asked Kermit about this, he alluded to the fact that "why would you put a tennis shoe in with the skull?  to insure that the evidence points to you and you will not talk!"  He also alluded that Kyle gave the tennis shoe to the FBI.  I asked him how Kyle got the shoe.  His reply was "exactly, he is just a boatman". 


Ok, I'll probably be slammed but that is ok.  I can go get the posts but everytime I do no one listens anyway.  But this convo with Kermit has always bothered me.  Now, with more info give by Kermit, it is making more sense to me.  I did research on the Silvetti Group and Luis Schaefer, both in financial trouble big time.  People do desperate things in desperate times.

I am just saying..........



KYcat, I'm listening to you. Good reminder of what OE said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: casa on November 21, 2008, 11:30:48 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 11:32:35 PM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 11:32:42 PM
Are there trawlers in Aruba?  Any shrimping going on there.  Lobster hunting or whatever you call in.  I was thinking these boats have a huge hole in the middle they fill up with ice to keep the catch fresh.  NH's body may have been stored there or the pieces of her body.  Boy, I hope this did not happen.  I really hope she is in one piece somewhere and the family will have a whole body to bury.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 21, 2008, 11:34:36 PM
I like the ways you all think..  ::MonkeyDance::
Never be worried about going out on a limb to posting how you feel. After 3.6 years or more you are all very educated on the subject matter. You have to have some hair on your chest to be here this long. ::MonkeyWink::
I post my research and defend myself to the death. I have no fear because I know what I post is the truth as I have researched it myself and understand it.
God Bless Beth and Dave Holloway and may all your hard work effort in reading, research and educated opinions help to keep the story alive by asking quality questions and ultimately help to bring a final and truthful answer to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
We want the truth !! We want Justice for Natalee !! We will not stop until we have it !

God I love the Good fight.. ::MonkeyCool::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 21, 2008, 11:35:12 PM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


Yep, I've had the exact same thought.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 21, 2008, 11:36:16 PM
All I am going to say is that I have looked at some of the information & I believe that the American's did as they are intelligent enough to do.  We American's have some heroes.

I appreciate the lover frog's input for without it I wouldn't have looked around as much as I did & now my soul is a bit more restful for I don't think the Aruban's were successful at all, quite the contrary & ************************* in your hat LieRuba & disgraces to the professions that are shipped from the Netherlands, American's are not all traitor's & are not stupid even though they can be polite.

I think that there are American traitor's, they came on scene very early on in 2005 & the Dutch have traitor's as well who so willingly covered up this travesty & constantly participated in completely false propaganda & misdirection of every sort right down to dealing face to face with the family of Natalee.  My fervent prayer is that it all comes home to roust & they are all revealed for just what they are; greedy soul less creatures that have no values & loyalty to nothing but money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 11:36:43 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 
Natalee was NOT put in the trap by "the boys." She was put there by a "bigger boat" days/weeks later.

I will repost my theory from February '08 again:



Quote from: wreck on Today at 03:20:36 PM
I'm going to dig a bigger hole for myself as I think few are following what I'm saying.
1) The Persistence in all likelihood has found Natalee in the trap.
2) They really did not want to expose this just yet. Why? Because they still need to "prove"
the "whys" and "hows". They have a better chance of accomplishing this if the actual "perps"
aren't "clued in."
3) Why the "Dateline" irregularities? Because "Dateline" was already on board and they had to
 keep up "appearances" so they could continue with their "plan."
4) The posting of the pics on the internet put a severe cramp in their plans.
5) Why is trap so big? Because the body disposal did not happen that night as in Joran's story.
 Her body was put there at least a few days later by a bigger boat involving a larger cover-up.
This why they did not reveal their "finding" yet. They want to find out who has that bigger boat.

Once again -- my opinion.

We have waited 3 years -- hold on -- we're almost there!


~~~~~~ (Ocean Explorer:
I also pray that you are right!  Wreck, I like the way you think. 
Wreck, then what are your thoughts on Mos's press release about the FBI results?

Don't know - don't care what Mos says or does. I trusted him up until Thanksgiving time. Never again.

trainwreck .gif =  (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/trainwreck.gif)

Thanx for bringing this back to my attention.Any threads on the bigger boats that could have carried this cage out there.Sure there are many boats going back and forth to other surrounding countries...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 21, 2008, 11:37:02 PM
Goodnight all.  I hope you have this solved by morning.  I am sleepy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 21, 2008, 11:39:14 PM
Im going too, my eyes are burning like xenon in the night.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:42:40 PM
All I am going to say is that I have looked at some of the information & I believe that the American's did as they are intelligent enough to do.  We American's have some heroes.

I appreciate the lover frog's input for without it I wouldn't have looked around as much as I did & now my soul is a bit more restful for I don't think the Aruban's were successful at all, quite the contrary & ************************* in your hat LieRuba & disgraces to the professions that are shipped from the Netherlands, American's are not all traitor's & are not stupid even though they can be polite.

I think that there are American traitor's, they came on scene very early on in 2005 & the Dutch have traitor's as well who so willingly covered up this travesty & constantly participated in completely false propaganda & misdirection of every sort right down to dealing face to face with the family of Natalee.  My fervent prayer is that it all comes home to roust & they are all revealed for just what they are; greedy soul less creatures that have no values & loyalty to nothing but money.

So, do you also think that the coverup was really that they DID bring some of her home? Then they are heros but can't tell anyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 21, 2008, 11:42:58 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 21, 2008, 11:43:23 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!
Casa, I agree with you 100%.  What was John going to get anyhow if he did find Natalee?  Alot less then what he actually put into the search.  I believe in Kyle also.  If he says you can't do that kind of scanning with "that" boat, then who knows better then him?  He does that for a living.  It is totally ungrateful to even think someone would go over there for the sake of themselves.  It's dangerous to begin with.  Trust me, been there, done that.  I have been watching this for days, I am sorry, I had to pop in.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:44:02 PM
I like the ways you all think..  ::MonkeyDance::
Never be worried about going out on a limb to posting how you feel. After 3.6 years or more you are all very educated on the subject matter. You have to have some hair on your chest to be here this long. ::MonkeyWink::
I post my research and defend myself to the death. I have no fear because I know what I post is the truth as I have researched it myself and understand it.
God Bless Beth and Dave Holloway and may all your hard work effort in reading, research and educated opinions help to keep the story alive by asking quality questions and ultimately help to bring a final and truthful answer to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
We want the truth !! We want Justice for Natalee !! We will not stop until we have it !

God I love the Good fight.. ::MonkeyCool::




Thanks Edward. I do believe that she will have justice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 21, 2008, 11:45:14 PM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


EXACTLY  Joran said he put her in the mangroves,......well thats exactly where the basin i,  right at the mangroves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 21, 2008, 11:46:46 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 

JMO....the drug dealers were at the filming at the Matty apts.
They put her in when they dropped the drugs.
I wonder how they do it too.  Somebody must dive.
And they would need a boat with a boom (think JAWS Hahahahah)

Or a hoist.  I don't think you can dive 90feet without tanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 21, 2008, 11:48:27 PM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?

A fisherman said he saw a man 'carry something' into the water.
Sander Gottenbos said he invited Joran on his boat.

Yes, I would consider Blonde's plastic bag contents being dropped off into the fish trap.

Especially with Steve Croes all alone on a boat in the middle of the water, just outside the H.I. that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 21, 2008, 11:50:45 PM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?

A fisherman said he saw a man 'carry something' into the water.
Sander Gottenbos said he invited Joran on his boat.

Yes, I would consider Blonde's plastic bag contents being dropped off into the fish trap.

Especially with Steve Croes all alone on a boat in the middle of the water, just outside the H.I. that night.


Forgot to mention that Sander reported his own cell phone missing that day at school.

(as in Joran's comment to Kalpoes "If the find the girl they will see the sh*t"... so the sh*t is the missing sneaker, the lost cell phone... yada yada yada...)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 21, 2008, 11:51:14 PM
From what we have been told, Natalee could not have been put in the commercial size fish trap and then taken out to sea.  It was too big and the trap in question had been there before Natalee arrived on Aruba.  It was a drug post office for the Colombian and Aruban drug dealers to deposit their drugs.  If nothing else, the commercial fish cage and the size sure do blow away the theory that a fish trap was stolen from the fisherman's huts.  The fish trap that disappeared from the huts was small.  According to the dimensions that were given by Dr, Hodge, the fishtrap from the huts would have been about the size of a queen size bed.  Caps told us that a crane would be necessary to lift the commercial trap in the photographs.  I don't think Urine and his friends put that cage in the ocean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:52:27 PM
She was put in the cage at the same time as the scheduled drug drop, probably a few days later. jmo

Hey, for SW Louisiana it sure is cold tonight--37 already. Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: casa on November 21, 2008, 11:53:06 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.


I have no information that Silvetti attended a Mansur wedding.  I have no information that he has a connection to Jossy. Actually I don't think that Caps knew John Silvetti and I don't think that Silvetti had any connections to Aruba before the search.  This is my opinon:  People cannot accept that the crab trap was in no way connected to Natalee and want someone to blame.  People were seeing all kinds of things in that trap that just were not there.  Believe me I want this case solved badly but seeing things and saying that people are covering up will not solve this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 21, 2008, 11:53:44 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: casa on November 21, 2008, 11:55:57 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!
Casa, I agree with you 100%.  What was John going to get anyhow if he did find Natalee?  Alot less then what he actually put into the search.  I believe in Kyle also.  If he says you can't do that kind of scanning with "that" boat, then who knows better then him?  He does that for a living.  It is totally ungrateful to even think someone would go over there for the sake of themselves.  It's dangerous to begin with.  Trust me, been there, done that.  I have been watching this for days, I am sorry, I had to pop in.

Thank you Hotshot. Silvetti had nothing to gain by participating in a coverup.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 21, 2008, 11:57:16 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!
Casa, I agree with you 100%.  What was John going to get anyhow if he did find Natalee?  Alot less then what he actually put into the search.  I believe in Kyle also.  If he says you can't do that kind of scanning with "that" boat, then who knows better then him?  He does that for a living.  It is totally ungrateful to even think someone would go over there for the sake of themselves.  It's dangerous to begin with.  Trust me, been there, done that.  I have been watching this for days, I am sorry, I had to pop in.
I'm seriously not trying to denigrate anyone  -- because I am only speculating on facts that I know to be true. The Persistence may not have been exploring for oil -- BUT they MAY have been mapping the ocean floor for a possible "pipeline". They may have been doing this in ADDITION to looking for Natalee or perhaps used this data "after-the-fact". Also, they may have been asked to keep their findings "secret" (see my post from February '08 above). Kermit seems to think there is something sinister -- I just don't know. I would hate to think that. All that said, I truly think Kermit is someone who we can trust.  ( Does ANYONE here know who he really is????)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 21, 2008, 11:57:21 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.  

Thanks Hotshot. I also think that they brought home what they needed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 21, 2008, 11:58:39 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.   

What do "they" have???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:01:55 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:04:26 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.   

What do "they" have???

It's what some of us think was found in the cage and hidden and brought back to the FBI. It's still never been confirmed and Kyle will not comment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:04:32 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.


I have no information that Silvetti attended a Mansur wedding.  I have no information that he has a connection to Jossy. Actually I don't think that Caps knew John Silvetti and I don't think that Silvetti had any connections to Aruba before the search.  This is my opinon:  People cannot accept that the crab trap was in no way connected to Natalee and want someone to blame.  People were seeing all kinds of things in that trap that just were not there.  Believe me I want this case solved badly but seeing things and saying that people are covering up will not solve this.

I promise you I do not want to place blame.........well, I do blame Urine and ALE and Paulaus and Anita and Julia and C Croes and...... well, you get my point!!!   ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you for your post.  You were kind to me and did not sling nanners.  I am not and will not slander J Silvetti .... I was just asking questions. 

Nanner peace offering

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:04:55 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:06:57 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:07:08 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.

That is possible but Kyle still won't comment on all the evidence that FBI has tested, except the denim.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 22, 2008, 12:07:39 AM
You are both welcome.  I also think that seeing as the diver, "mansur" did the thumbs down for the camera, and for our sake to let things finish, as they needed to be.  Not all of the people there are crooked.  Some actually do care about finding Natalee.  

We all have our different thoughts, and I am not saying that anyone is right, or wrong here.  We all have oppinions, and if we didn't we wouldn't be normal. Thats what makes this blog great.  We will see when things finally end, that alot of us were right.  Maybe not the whole story line, maybe only bits and pieces.  But we have all contributed to this blog one way or another.  We are all here for a purpose, Thanks to Natalee.  I still stand by the girl.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 22, 2008, 12:09:04 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 12:09:19 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.

That is possible but Kyle still won't comment on all the evidence that FBI has tested, except the denim.
That is what gives me hope that "FBI knows".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:09:20 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::

Yep, and a goooddd cigar!  ::MonkeyDance:: How cold is it in your area? It's really cold in mine for such an early time of year. This is usual for Jan. Enjoy your Cajun poose cafe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:09:36 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.  

Thanks Hotshot. I also think that they brought home what they needed.

I really like this theory...... so that's my story and I'm sticking to it!!  Thanks Hotshot for the info on CAPS and Silvetti.  I did not know this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 12:10:45 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.   

What do "they" have???

It's what some of us think was found in the cage and hidden and brought back to the FBI. It's still never been confirmed and Kyle will not comment.

The hidden part is what's confusing me???At what point would they have been able to conceal what "They" had and get it back to the FBI??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:11:28 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 

Yep, he sure paid someone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:12:25 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 


NO NO NO,  CRACK IS BAD.  CRACK KILLS>>>>> Besides it could have come from Aruba through Venezula.   Smoke dope and go to sleep.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:14:29 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.   

What do "they" have???

It's what some of us think was found in the cage and hidden and brought back to the FBI. It's still never been confirmed and Kyle will not comment.

The hidden part is what's confusing me???At what point would they have been able to conceal what "They" had and get it back to the FBI??

Maybe a secret dive, when no one else was there. This way the important ones couldn't be blamed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:14:57 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::

Yep, and a goooddd cigar!  ::MonkeyDance:: How cold is it in your area? It's really cold in mine for such an early time of year. This is usual for Jan. Enjoy your Cajun poose cafe.

Colder than a witches ttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttyyyyyyy.  24 degrees and suppose to be 19 degrees tomorrow night.    Definitely Jan weather here too. 

Yes, don't mind if I do, take a cigar too.   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 12:15:58 AM
You are both welcome.  I also think that seeing as the diver, "mansur" did the thumbs down for the camera, and for our sake to let things finish, as they needed to be.  Not all of the people there are crooked.  Some actually do care about finding Natalee.  

We all have our different thoughts, and I am not saying that anyone is right, or wrong here.  We all have oppinions, and if we didn't we wouldn't be normal. Thats what makes this blog great.  We will see when things finally end, that alot of us were right.  Maybe not the whole story line, maybe only bits and pieces.  But we have all contributed to this blog one way or another.  We are all here for a purpose, Thanks to Natalee.  I still stand by the girl.

Good to see you Hotshot!   ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:17:19 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.

That is possible but Kyle still won't comment on all the evidence that FBI has tested, except the denim.




OK, just another "what if" with no other opinions offered.  What if there was denim in the trap and it was a man's jeans?

I ask these questions also because we have been told that Natalee was possibly placed in a crypt at the Masonic Cemetery.  Carpe did some good research and came up with a woman named Jalitza Wever who died on June 2nd and was buried in the cemetery.  He posted photographs of Jalitza Wever over in Shango and she really does look a little like Natalee.  My theory has pretty much always been that the fishermans huts are nonsense and that Natalee is buried on land somewhere. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:17:25 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::

Yep, and a goooddd cigar!  ::MonkeyDance:: How cold is it in your area? It's really cold in mine for such an early time of year. This is usual for Jan. Enjoy your Cajun poose cafe.

Colder than a witches ttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttyyyyyyy.  24 degrees and suppose to be 19 degrees tomorrow night.    Definitely Jan weather here too. 

Yes, don't mind if I do, take a cigar too.   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

You do know that not too many girl monkeys smoke cigars? My family really gets ticked. LOL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 12:17:30 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 
I don't know why I keep arguing with you - I'm sorry, but that is not how drug trafficking works. Drug deals of a large proportion don't occur with money exchanging hands at the drop off or with amounts that can be withdrawn from an ATM. Paulus went to the ATM THAT Sunday night -- Natalee was not in the big fish cage at that time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:18:49 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::

Yep, and a goooddd cigar!  ::MonkeyDance:: How cold is it in your area? It's really cold in mine for such an early time of year. This is usual for Jan. Enjoy your Cajun poose cafe.

Colder than a witches ttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttyyyyyyy.  24 degrees and suppose to be 19 degrees tomorrow night.    Definitely Jan weather here too. 

Yes, don't mind if I do, take a cigar too.   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

You do know that not too many girl monkeys smoke cigars? My family really gets ticked. LOL!

Oh, I'm celebrating my birthday in 45 mins. so it's my treat. Yippppeeeee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 22, 2008, 12:19:45 AM
The more complicated, convoluted and all-encompassing a theory is, the less likely it is to be true.  Occam's razor and all that. 

Must be very unique drug dealers to abandon a "drop off" of any size out in the middle of the ocean like that.  Most don't seem to want to let it out of their sight.  That stuff has a way of disappearing.

Why dive 90 ft when it is not necessary at all? 

I guess Greta has what Julia was alluding to on RU a while back about another confession from Joran.  I'm going to wait and see what the Sporter has to say before thinking any farther along.  Sure, he lies but then so so lots of others.  Greta seems to think Mos can verify this with subpoena.  So I tend to think it is dealing with money transactions of some sort as well.  I wonder what caught Paulus attention so raptly?

Still see this as a fairly simple crime committed by a dolt and without the assistance of half the island.  The cover up was a bit more complicated than that but not nearly as much as all this intrigue.

I only hope that some day we do know exactly what happened to Natalee.  Maybe Monday we will know something more, anything at all will help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 22, 2008, 12:19:50 AM
Hey Klaas. Our post numbers are not changing. Didn't know if you needed this info.


Is Red  giving out prizes for cage time now???   ::MonkeyTongue::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:20:10 AM
Another thought....  If I were a sociopath who killed someone, I would want to make certain that I got away with the murder.  If I put the body in a fish cage in the ocean, someone like Persistence could come along and find it.  If I buried the body on land, I could keep an eye on it and be reassured that my secret was safe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:20:14 AM
CASA, I WILL SHARE MY COFFEE W/ BAILEYS AND CIGAR WITH YOU IF YOU WILL FORGIVE ME?

 :roll: :smt022


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 12:20:47 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.   

What do "they" have???

It's what some of us think was found in the cage and hidden and brought back to the FBI. It's still never been confirmed and Kyle will not comment.

The hidden part is what's confusing me???At what point would they have been able to conceal what "They" had and get it back to the FBI??

Maybe a secret dive, when no one else was there. This way the important ones couldn't be blamed.

May be a dumb question but,who is considered important,as well as unimportant???Must close up shop and head home in the rainy Northwest weather and will return shortly.Monkey's should all be proud!

Keepthefaith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:20:50 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.

That is possible but Kyle still won't comment on all the evidence that FBI has tested, except the denim.




OK, just another "what if" with no other opinions offered.  What if there was denim in the trap and it was a man's jeans?

I ask these questions also because we have been told that Natalee was possibly placed in a crypt at the Masonic Cemetery.  Carpe did some good research and came up with a woman named Jalitza Wever who died on June 2nd and was buried in the cemetery.  He posted photographs of Jalitza Wever over in Shango and she really does look a little like Natalee.  My theory has pretty much always been that the fishermans huts are nonsense and that Natalee is buried on land somewhere. 

But maybe buried in pieces.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 22, 2008, 12:21:02 AM

Quote
Good to see you Hotshot!   ::MonkeyCool::

Good to see you too Texasmom



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 22, 2008, 12:21:38 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 
I don't know why I keep arguing with you - I'm sorry, but that is not how drug trafficking works. Drug deals of a large proportion don't occur with money exchanging hands at the drop off or with amounts that can be withdrawn from an ATM. Paulus went to the ATM THAT Sunday night -- Natalee was not in the big fish cage at that time.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:22:56 AM
Also... according to Caps, the adults and important ALE people are also members of the Masonic Lodge.  They had unlimited access to the cemetery.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:23:14 AM
Hey Klaas. Our post numbers are not changing. Didn't know if you needed this info.


Is Red  giving out prizes for cage time now???   ::MonkeyTongue::



Yep, cigars!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:23:48 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::

Yep, and a goooddd cigar!  ::MonkeyDance:: How cold is it in your area? It's really cold in mine for such an early time of year. This is usual for Jan. Enjoy your Cajun poose cafe.

Colder than a witches ttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttyyyyyyy.  24 degrees and suppose to be 19 degrees tomorrow night.    Definitely Jan weather here too. 

Yes, don't mind if I do, take a cigar too.   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

You do know that not too many girl monkeys smoke cigars? My family really gets ticked. LOL!

Oh, I'm celebrating my birthday in 45 mins. so it's my treat. Yippppeeeee!

Just on special occasions and since it is your birthday, I think I will smoke one!  HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU........HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU.......... MAY ALL YOUR DREAMS COME TRUE.....

 :smt038


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: casa on November 22, 2008, 12:24:23 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.


I have no information that Silvetti attended a Mansur wedding.  I have no information that he has a connection to Jossy. Actually I don't think that Caps knew John Silvetti and I don't think that Silvetti had any connections to Aruba before the search.  This is my opinon:  People cannot accept that the crab trap was in no way connected to Natalee and want someone to blame.  People were seeing all kinds of things in that trap that just were not there.  Believe me I want this case solved badly but seeing things and saying that people are covering up will not solve this.

I promise you I do not want to place blame.........well, I do blame Urine and ALE and Paulaus and Anita and Julia and C Croes and...... well, you get my point!!!   ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you for your post.  You were kind to me and did not sling nanners.  I am not and will not slander J Silvetti .... I was just asking questions. 

Nanner peace offering

 ::MonkeyWink::

Kycat nothing wrong with asking questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 22, 2008, 12:26:38 AM
Hey Klaas. Our post numbers are not changing. Didn't know if you needed this info.


Is Red  giving out prizes for cage time now???   ::MonkeyTongue::



Not that I know of FOM, but the post count sometimes goes off...not sure why.  Good to see you...I know you stop by once in a while...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 12:26:50 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 
I don't know why I keep arguing with you - I'm sorry, but that is not how drug trafficking works. Drug deals of a large proportion don't occur with money exchanging hands at the drop off or with amounts that can be withdrawn from an ATM. Paulus went to the ATM THAT Sunday night -- Natalee was not in the big fish cage at that time.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Then, I'm not following what you are proposing - help me!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: casa on November 22, 2008, 12:26:55 AM
CASA, I WILL SHARE MY COFFEE W/ BAILEYS AND CIGAR WITH YOU IF YOU WILL FORGIVE ME?

 :roll: :smt022
Not mad at you hon!  We are ok!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:28:17 AM
Anyone want a Cajun poose cafe for a cold night? (It's coffee pushed with booze)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes please.    Do you have any Baileys?  Yum

 ::cartwheel::

Yep, and a goooddd cigar!  ::MonkeyDance:: How cold is it in your area? It's really cold in mine for such an early time of year. This is usual for Jan. Enjoy your Cajun poose cafe.

Colder than a witches ttttttttiiiiiiiiiiiitttttttyyyyyyy.  24 degrees and suppose to be 19 degrees tomorrow night.    Definitely Jan weather here too. 

Yes, don't mind if I do, take a cigar too.   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

You do know that not too many girl monkeys smoke cigars? My family really gets ticked. LOL!

Oh, I'm celebrating my birthday in 45 mins. so it's my treat. Yippppeeeee!

Just on special occasions and since it is your birthday, I think I will smoke one!  HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU........HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU.......... MAY ALL YOUR DREAMS COME TRUE.....

 :smt038

Thanks Kycat, you're special too and I hope that your tit###ies don't freeze. Each new birthday is extra special since I was close to death just 4 years ago and had my miracle. Life can be so awesome and while I was so ill, I was caught up in Natalee's tragedy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 22, 2008, 12:28:47 AM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 
I don't know why I keep arguing with you - I'm sorry, but that is not how drug trafficking works. Drug deals of a large proportion don't occur with money exchanging hands at the drop off or with amounts that can be withdrawn from an ATM. Paulus went to the ATM THAT Sunday night -- Natalee was not in the big fish cage at that time.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Then, I'm not following what you are proposing - help me!
nanner basket, please.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:30:43 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:31:48 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:32:46 AM
Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle and many, many more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 22, 2008, 12:32:52 AM
Happy Birthday Cajun......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:34:06 AM
Thanks SS and Always. Cigars and Cajun poose cafe for all but NO crack.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 22, 2008, 12:34:14 AM
G'nite, everyone....it's time for me, anyway. 

Bring Natalee Home.....there's no place like home... :smt049



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:35:16 AM
G'nite, everyone....it's time for me, anyway. 

Bring Natalee Home.....there's no place like home... :smt049



Nit 2NJ


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 12:35:30 AM

So, do you also think that the coverup was really that they DID bring some of her home? Then they are heros but can't tell anyone.

I think there were preventative measures taken.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 22, 2008, 12:36:21 AM
Gnite all, and Happy Birthday Cajun!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:37:43 AM
I also think that US was NOT dumb to all of Aruba's shinanigans.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:38:35 AM
Gnite all, and Happy Birthday Cajun!   ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks Hotshot. Good nite.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 12:41:06 AM
One More Post.  LOL

Cajun, near death makes you appreciate life so much more, doesn't it.  Very thankful that you are with us.  May you Enjoy your Miracle called Life everyday.

 :smt056

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 12:44:07 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat!

Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 12:44:17 AM
Montecristos for all that wants one! (Angie, Robots, and I have some "Opus XXX's" saved back for the final conclusion)  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:44:28 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.

That is possible but Kyle still won't comment on all the evidence that FBI has tested, except the denim.




OK, just another "what if" with no other opinions offered.  What if there was denim in the trap and it was a man's jeans?

I ask these questions also because we have been told that Natalee was possibly placed in a crypt at the Masonic Cemetery.  Carpe did some good research and came up with a woman named Jalitza Wever who died on June 2nd and was buried in the cemetery.  He posted photographs of Jalitza Wever over in Shango and she really does look a little like Natalee.  My theory has pretty much always been that the fishermans huts are nonsense and that Natalee is buried on land somewhere. 

But maybe buried in pieces.



We were also given that information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:45:18 AM
One More Post.  LOL

Cajun, near death makes you appreciate life so much more, doesn't it.  Very thankful that you are with us.  May you Enjoy your Miracle called Life everyday.

 :smt056

 

Thanks KYcat. It's been a blessing and I do appreciate every day now. God had more for me to do then just slide down fluffy clouds.  Even my doctors call me a miracle and I just tell them to get over it. LOL! Bunch of jerks. If only we could get closure for Natalee's family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:47:10 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat!

Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks Texasmom. And I do want some of Wreck's stuff for the conclusion, even though I have NO idea what it is. Sounds mysterious.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 12:48:41 AM
Gnite all, and Happy Birthday Cajun!   ::MonkeyDance::

Goodnight Hotshot


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 22, 2008, 12:51:14 AM
G'nite, everyone....it's time for me, anyway. 

Bring Natalee Home.....there's no place like home... :smt049



Nit 2NJ

nite nj
nite always
nite cajun
nite ss
nite wreck
nite johnboy

nite KLASS
u all rock monkeys


i hope everyone sleeps well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:51:32 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.

That is possible but Kyle still won't comment on all the evidence that FBI has tested, except the denim.




OK, just another "what if" with no other opinions offered.  What if there was denim in the trap and it was a man's jeans?

I ask these questions also because we have been told that Natalee was possibly placed in a crypt at the Masonic Cemetery.  Carpe did some good research and came up with a woman named Jalitza Wever who died on June 2nd and was buried in the cemetery.  He posted photographs of Jalitza Wever over in Shango and she really does look a little like Natalee.  My theory has pretty much always been that the fishermans huts are nonsense and that Natalee is buried on land somewhere. 

But maybe buried in pieces.



We were also given that information.

They never thought that the US would bring a big ship to scan the ocean. Once the evidence was down there, they thought that they were safe but only part of her was down there.  US wanted to take NO chances that this evidence would be mishandled and lost again, so the coverup. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 12:52:36 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat!

Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks Texasmom. And I do want some of Wreck's stuff for the conclusion, even though I have NO idea what it is. Sounds mysterious.
Google Opus X cigars!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 12:52:49 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat!

Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks Texasmom. And I do want some of Wreck's stuff for the conclusion, even though I have NO idea what it is. Sounds mysterious.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  I think that may be cigars too.   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Scandi on November 22, 2008, 12:53:16 AM
Hi and then Good Night all you dear posters who I am getting to know by folowing your posts.  Thanks for the lively and fascinating discussion.  And Happy Birthday to you Cajun Miracle.

There is one great thing about this forum, and that is that it is all about Natalee and Justice for her.  xox


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 12:53:56 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat!

Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks Texasmom. And I do want some of Wreck's stuff for the conclusion, even though I have NO idea what it is. Sounds mysterious.
Google Opus X cigars!  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyDance:: goody, I thought right!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:57:43 AM
Okay, giving birthday cake to Cajun..........  enjoy

Giving some coffee w/baileys and 1 cigar to Casa......... enjoy

Giving milk to A1.......  (oh alright, you can have some coffee with baileys too) ...... enjoy.......... but like I said no CRACK for you!!!

Giving KUDOS to all Monkeys.  Good Night.   :2waver:

Goodnight KYcat!

Happy Birthday Cajun Miracle!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::

Thanks Texasmom. And I do want some of Wreck's stuff for the conclusion, even though I have NO idea what it is. Sounds mysterious.
Google Opus X cigars!  ::MonkeyCool::

Sounds awesome. What about the XXX ones?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 12:59:05 AM
Hi and then Good Night all you dear posters who I am getting to know by folowing your posts.  Thanks for the lively and fascinating discussion.  And Happy Birthday to you Cajun Miracle.

There is one great thing about this forum, and that is that it is all about Natalee and Justice for her.  xox

Thanks Scandi. At first I thought I was going to get some type of drugged, kinky stuff from Wreck. LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 01:01:49 AM
It's midnight and I've made another year. Yipppeeee   ::MonkeyDance:: Hey wreck, when this all finishes can I email you for one of those Opus ones and if I still have some Cubans, I'll send ya some?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 01:04:28 AM
Hi and then Good Night all you dear posters who I am getting to know by folowing your posts.  Thanks for the lively and fascinating discussion.  And Happy Birthday to you Cajun Miracle.

There is one great thing about this forum, and that is that it is all about Natalee and Justice for her.  xox

Thanks Scandi. At first I thought I was going to get some type of drugged, kinky stuff from Wreck. LOL
Well, it IS your birthday!!!  ::MonkeyHaHa::   ( about 5 years ago I had about 10 Opus X cigars @ $12. apiece -- now you MAY find  just one at about $35. each) (These aren't even "Cuban"!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 01:16:14 AM
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005/09/ex-commissioner-stanley-zaandam-in-his.html

9.19.2005
Ex-commissioner Stanley Zaandam in his new book KPA-Quo Vadis 2,3
To exculpate the son of Paul vd Sloot, the commissioner and fiscal falsely arrested two ex security guards
Police command nominations named as the reason of the mistake
Bon Dia Aruba
9/19/2005

ORANJESTAD – The police corps committed a blunder in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. According to ex-commissioner Stanley Zaandam, who dedicates attention to the case here and also in his upcoming publication.

According to Zaandam, the nominations - of among others Commissioners Bernardina, Dompig, Hassel and Richardson, along with 34 high-rank 1st class inspectors - which are against the law and hierarchy of the KPA [police corps], have serious consequences for the quality and integrity of work in KPA.

Accoding to Zaandam, none of the high-ranked commissioners has the qualifications nor experience to conduct a judicial investigation.

Police at the top of political list

According to Zaandam, Commissioner Dompig is under the instruction of Minister Rudy Croes, of MEP.
He also states that 20 other policemen were ranked high on a political list. Five others (…) among them Commissioner Hassell, according to Zaandam.

He also claims this is how Commissioner vd Straten was appointed to this case. However, according to Zaandam, this should not be work for a commissioner.

BLUNDER

Zaandam continues talking about the blunder under which the 3 youngsters were questioned, which should have been a simple case, but one that resulted in KPA’s biggest blunder, due to the deceiptfulness of JvdS, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, they remained free another 12 days.

FALSE ARREST

Zaandam keeps on saying in his book, two days after 5/29, the body of Natalee H. may have already been found and Cvp [police commissioner] looked the other way to do a favour for Paul vd Sloot (ex of chief staff of Cabinet PG [prosecutor general] J. Zwinkels). To exculpate the son of Paul, the CvP and fiscal chief prosecutor Karen Jansen made the false arrest of two ex-security guards, Jones and John , called this a ‘tactical maneuver’ , and denied them their freedom for another 10 days.

This, continues Zaandam in his book, is the issue here. However, he has much more to tell regarding the case of Natalee Holloway.

[translated by Getagrip]
Posted by Getagrip at 9/19/2005 12:18:00 PM

11/21/08 Awe Mainta Page 19

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/11212008AweMaintaZaandam.jpg)

Pap Translation:

suscrito on 5-7 november 2008 owing to haci one denunsia can escrito at ministerio publico (o.m.), esta the 2 pg, of corte comun of husticia of antias (n.a.) & aruba of the next delitonan, actonan criminal of resp. we codigo of derecho penal (wetboek.v.strafrecht/ lv.”strafrechtelijke aanspraakelijkheid ministers”) art.372Ş (abuso of power ministerial intencional) — 372b(culpabilidad at owing to.d.p.m.i.)-213 (perhurio/ meineed) 230(=falsificacion can escrito/valsbeid and.g.) -323 (=ladronisia/diefstal) 334/335 (=defraude/verduistering (-den servisio/- indienstbet rekking)-339 (=estafa/oplichting)-366/372 (=kiebra y dańo/vernieling ) jo.art. 49 (co-sospechoso/ mededaders) – 50 (=complicidad/ mede-plichtigheid) -art. 1 of protocol the.v.r.m, (tratado european of derecho human y of libertadnan fundamental / “europese verdrag tot beseherming v/d rechten v/d mens provided that de fundamentele vrijbeden. the articulonan relevante of “decreto penal of labamento of placa” (lv.’strafbaarstelling witwassen ab not.701’93 + not. 34/’97= wijz.)-jo. art. of ”constitushon of aruba”/ staatsregeling van aruba. c or m or ( c or ) sospechosonan,complicenan, testigonan (experto); of owing to participa because; such n’e delitonan / actonan criminal, owing to wordo denuncia the next ministronan- ambtenaarnan y another personan/ciudadanonan the.o.:1 come across.minag/minpres-n.o.oduber - 2. minjus-h.(rudy) croes -3.minfin.-n.j.j.(nilo) swaen bac.- 4.(ex)minag/minpresmr. j.fi.a.(henny) eman - 5.(ex)minjus the.j.(watty) voice ( t ) - 6. (ex) minjus mr.p.e.(eddy) croes - 7.(ex) minfin. drs.dr.r.r.(tico) croes - 8. s.e.gobernador - f.refunjol - 9.(ex) gob.- mr.o. koolman. 10.(ex) dirkagmr. j.p.boersen. - 11.(ex) dir. kag.- mr.m.bakker.-12.(ex) consehero/pr.-mr. m.g.(mike) eman(=conhunto cu his brother ex-minpres) -13.(ex) consehero/ dir.dwjz-urbano lopez y 5 dwjz hurista -14. (ex) pg y judge -mr.drs.t.croes- fernandes pedra - y 20 another name of magistradonan - 15.larvz.-mr. r.p.sommer y others of larcie - 16.h.d.p. &. or.j. drs.o.e.thijsen-lares.- 17.-19. dir.fin. drs.e.o.croesy suplentenan - therefore. v/d ham. - abrouwer. - 20. k.p.a-korpschefs -mr.r.bernadina y -p. de witte. denunciante owing to ask the 2 pg for let persigui, investiga y cuestiona all esnan upstairs menciona, y (in)directo owing to sugeri p’esey take lugar by of funcionarionan imparcial, for buena marcha of hustisia provided that conexion cu the will can come cu come across,‘un ácto of vengansa’ (=wraking). besides denunciante owing to ask by now, for present his self because;, victima, of the delitonan/ actonan criminal cometi p’esnan indica, y owing to ask damage (im)material the.o. of one suma considerable (=art.206 codigo penal/w.v.sv.). besides owing to ask the suma of afl.50.000 for cada acto criminal cu wordo comproba in tribunal. can ultimo owing to base of the words (in)directo of (ex) pg.- suplente mr.nico jorg (=20 juni’08 volkskrant—amigo- diario) y hoge raad; denuciante is wait for of achieve soon the news cu the (co)sospechosonan, complicenan owing to wordo geschors, destitui, cuestiona, in funccion because; minister/ambtenar y aresta. is become time for aruba deshaci of his minister/ambtenar-gangster /gang of bandido, hinca by 1975 in the 2-gang mep + avp in gobierno of aruba. suscrito: =(ex) c.v.p-ed/ ambt.: denunciante/victima: stanley j.zaandam flacciusstraat 25. - aruba come across



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 01:27:24 AM
But this book by Ex-commissioner Stanley Zaandam never surfaced, did it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 01:38:56 AM
well TxMom both of those articles look to be interesting but I can't make heads nor tails of the content.  Any chance Klaas can ask Sandy to attempt translation for us one language challenged posters???????

Good finds & good attempt to translate but for this dummy, don't get it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 01:47:17 AM
well TxMom both of those articles look to be interesting but I can't make heads nor tails of the content.  Any chance Klaas can ask Sandy to attempt translation for us one language challenged posters???????

Good finds & good attempt to translate but for this dummy, don't get it.

I am trying to get a "real" translation, hopefully it will come through or Sandy Leiva will be in the cage soon and help us out.  The name just caught my eye...and some of what I could understand did too.  I never did see any more about the book after the article, and have always wondered what he had to say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 01:50:09 AM
Yoooohoooo Kermit....I have something for you!  And more where that came from!  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/blueflip04.gif)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 01:53:25 AM
Yoooohoooo Kermit....I have something for you!  And more where that came from!  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/blueflip04.gif)



Does Kermit stay up this late?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: IBE on November 22, 2008, 01:57:34 AM
But this book by Ex-commissioner Stanley Zaandam never surfaced, did it?

My memory is foggy, but I think it was published. Will look.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 02:02:16 AM
well TxMom both of those articles look to be interesting but I can't make heads nor tails of the content.  Any chance Klaas can ask Sandy to attempt translation for us one language challenged posters???????

Good finds & good attempt to translate but for this dummy, don't get it.

I am trying to get a "real" translation, hopefully it will come through or Sandy Leiva will be in the cage soon and help us out.  The name just caught my eye...and some of what I could understand did too.  I never did see any more about the book after the article, and have always wondered what he had to say.

I know that some time back the book was discussed by some of us here & it was said that it was never published & of course we all thought that was quite odd for he obviously had written it prior to referencing it in that newspaper article.  We were hoping  Mr. Z had neither been harmed or bought off.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 02:03:30 AM
Just watched Greta's teaser with Joran.The rats on the island have got to be scurrin around knowing Joran has a penchant to talk or is this his way of sayin...Send more money...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 02:12:13 AM
Yoooohoooo Kermit....I have something for you!  And more where that came from!  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/blueflip04.gif)



Does Kermit stay up this late?

Yes, sometimes anyway.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If not it'll be here waiting!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 02:15:23 AM
I have it hynotized, so all it can do is go around and around in circles until Kermit comes and gobbles it up!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 02:16:34 AM
 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I think I need some sleep!  hypnotized!  Still might not be spelled right..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: cajun miracle on November 22, 2008, 02:18:00 AM
Yoooohoooo Kermit....I have something for you!  And more where that came from!  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/blueflip04.gif)



Does Kermit stay up this late?

Yes, sometimes anyway.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

If not it'll be here waiting!

Thanks for tempting him. You must be a nightowl too. Nite all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: iris44 on November 22, 2008, 02:20:43 AM
OK This is just my opinion. After Tim left so suddenly and the Peter tapes were shown, Beth seemed more at peace. That is another reason that I think that something of Natalee's was found and tested. Why these results have never been reported, I have no idea since it has been almost 1 year. I still feel that the skull was brought back to the US and tested, so that Aruba wouldn't have control over it.

I agree.  I thought Beth seemed completely at peace also and have suspected she must have more information.  I don't think she would just take Joran's word for it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 02:34:50 AM
the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only.
<snip>
the FBI gave them to Dave H

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047



Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -
« Reply #740 on: March 18, 2008, 12:22:38 PM »
After the visual inspection on 30-Dec, the initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap. 
<snip>
The talks continued after Jan-7th when the samples were collected.

<snip>
On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.
snip>
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.
 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321


The trap contents weren't sampled until the 7th of January.  Neither Tim Miller, Tim Trahan, or Dateline were on board during this time. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366312#msg366312


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 04:21:47 PM »

We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857

Quote from: private eye on March 19, 2008, 02:54:38 PM
 I am curious what the circumstances were surrounding his leave from the boat he described during which the Dutch ship came close to the trap location.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366826#msg366826

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366289#msg366289
Human remains were found


the items found inside the trap
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366281#msg366281



I inquired about the Dutch coast guard being on site
 "we do not have dive capability
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366325#msg366325

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap
<snip>
Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 02:44:35 AM
All I will say is Kermit may think he knows some things, but I fear he is way off base in some of his ideas and I have very good reason to say this. 

I am not telling you anything that is based upon "ideas"
I base what I tell you on FACTS!

You do not have to believe me.
BUT those who know me, know my background, know what I do, what I have done, know better then to doubt me.
That's all I'm saying. And I'm not going to try to convince you otherwise.
I consider you a nice lady and I hate to see you have to say, "I'm sorry kermmie, I was wrong, you were right."

ribbit







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 02:47:02 AM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

Why would PI bring up zip locks? 

I can't tell you or I will have to kill you. ::MonkeyCool::


The talks continued after Jan-7th when the samples were collected.
<snip>
On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.
snip>
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.[/b] 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 02:50:33 AM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?


Time shall unfold what plighted cunning hides:
Who cover faults, at last shame them derides.
(King Lear)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 02:54:14 AM
Kermit has given us all clues to investigate.  I don't believe that Kermit would lead us down this road if there is nothing to it.  I don't know John Silvetti personally, and I don't know his heart.  I do know that he is human.  I have considered him and well as all of the other Crew of the Persistence "Heroes" just like everyone else.  It has been awful to realize that any of them could have assisted in covering up what was actually found.  IMO OE even has some questions about what was going on during the final days regarding the cage.  I'd heard about a disagreement among some on the boat long before this recent discussion, didn't think much about it as they were all probably exhausted...thought about it a lot lately.  Do I think that Kermit may be right?  Yes, I do; and I want the facts.  JMO

For Natalee, that's what it's about.  

 ::MonkeyCool::

Whick would work? Offer Kermit some treats or threaten to fry his legs.

Treats definitely!  I'll be shopping for some later!   ::MonkeyWink::

As many times as Ms. Klassend has "run to the store" she has yet to bring poor ol kermmie a bug.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 02:59:57 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.


I have no information that Silvetti attended a Mansur wedding.  I have no information that he has a connection to Jossy. Actually I don't think that Caps knew John Silvetti and I don't think that Silvetti had any connections to Aruba before the search.  This is my opinon:  People cannot accept that the crab trap was in no way connected to Natalee and want someone to blame.  People were seeing all kinds of things in that trap that just were not there.  Believe me I want this case solved badly but seeing things and saying that people are covering up will not solve this.

Unfortunately, you are wrong. I'm sorry. But it is the truth.
You are duped by someone I guess you thought you knew.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 03:01:15 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!
Casa, I agree with you 100%.  What was John going to get anyhow if he did find Natalee?  Alot less then what he actually put into the search.  I believe in Kyle also.  If he says you can't do that kind of scanning with "that" boat, then who knows better then him?  He does that for a living.  It is totally ungrateful to even think someone would go over there for the sake of themselves.  It's dangerous to begin with.  Trust me, been there, done that.  I have been watching this for days, I am sorry, I had to pop in.
I'm seriously not trying to denigrate anyone  -- because I am only speculating on facts that I know to be true. The Persistence may not have been exploring for oil -- BUT they MAY have been mapping the ocean floor for a possible "pipeline". They may have been doing this in ADDITION to looking for Natalee or perhaps used this data "after-the-fact". Also, they may have been asked to keep their findings "secret" (see my post from February '08 above). Kermit seems to think there is something sinister -- I just don't know. I would hate to think that. All that said, I truly think Kermit is someone who we can trust.  ( Does ANYONE here know who he really is????)

I know who kermit is!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 03:04:59 AM
Yoooohoooo Kermit....I have something for you!  And more where that came from!  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/blueflip04.gif)



Burp!
and

thank you



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 03:05:44 AM
Yoooohoooo Kermit....I have something for you!  And more where that came from!  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/blueflip04.gif)



Does Kermit stay up this late?

Depends on where I am.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 03:19:46 AM
Quote
I was looking into some disturbing thigs about the racial tensions on the island. All is NOT as happy as it seems. Van DerStraaten and Van derSloot both propose to be environmentalists :(. Follow the money... Van derStraaten has made some investment in Aruba's environmentally friendly ca$sinos (rumor is it is in other family members names until after he retires). The oil refinery which hires many of the native islanders on the the 'bad' side of the island, where nothing is maintained and tourists rarely travel due to the stinch of the landfill nearby.

It is said that the dutch and expats live on the west and north end while the blacks lives on the south and east end. They do not attend the same schools and there is a very distinct class difference. The black islanders are taught to treat all tourists and especially lighter skinned people with honor. The lighter the skin, the better the treatment.

I really do not know. That any of this is true. Just repeating what is being said in small circles.

I do have a question. How many black tourists does Aruba get? Is this a reasonable path to pursue?

Posted by: Island Hopper | Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 01:44 AM


Follow the money.  Maybe some do not want additional water searches...it's bad for the casino business.  Scares the tourists away.  Who knows what lurks in the water around Aruba?

How much do the key players in the NH case have invested in casinos?  Timeshares?  Condos?

I remember that speculation in other places to.

What would investors be willing to do to get tourists back?  Get the money flowing through casinos?

Is the money on the island in oil refinery?  The US in on the road to oil independence in 10 years.  What interest does the US have in oil around Aruba?

Who would have such an interest?  China?  China has the contracts in Iraq.  China has the contracts and oil fields in Darfur. 

China in Aruba next?  Weren't the Chinese investigating Aruba for 'tourism' a year or so ago?  Maybe they were really looking for oil?  Isn't China in Cuba too?

Or casinos?  Money laundering?  Drugs?

Now Whiskey you are catching on. Go find more:
Hint:
CMCC a SPlit! Car Show
China Mobile Communications Corp (CMCC)


NOW IN ARUBA LOOK AT THIS

24 Augustus, 2006
Bank a bid cu biaha more special!

CMCC TA FREEZE BO PAGO MENSUAL CMCC TA freeze BO
monthly payments

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Duran te un anochi masha ameno, Sr. Oranjestad
(AAN): During a MASH anochi entertaining, Mr. Javier Wolter, Gerente di CMB, a yama bon bini na tur agencia di auto y bromer, miembronan di prensa y demas invitadonan, pa sera conoci cu Caribbean Mercantile Credit Company NV su facilidadnan nobo, mas espacioso y confortabel pa e clientenan. Javier Wolter, manager di CMB, yama bon bini na tur agency di auto and bromine, miembronan di press and other invitadonan, pa be known cu Caribbean Mercantile Credit Company NV facilidadnan his nob, more spacious and confortabel pa and clientenan.
http://tinyurl.com/57uy6a


SEE SOME FAMILIAR NAMES


WE HAVE A CONNECTION BETWEEN ODUBER WANTING
TO BRING THE CHINESE TO ARUBA TO DO BUSINESS


Paulus traveled on business a lot
(kind of odd isn't it for a wanna be judge)

Paulus and Oduber and Smid attended the same University.

China Wants to Make Aruba Its Gateway to South America

On 5-24-06 ARUBAAN's news-sourced "Amigoe.com" reported:

<QUOTE>

Chinese interest in oil-prospecting near Aruba

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber(r) explaining what Aruba has to offer to Chinese investors.

As you follow the money and corruption, it will open your eyes.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 22, 2008, 03:22:58 AM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 
Natalee was NOT put in the trap by "the boys." She was put there by a "bigger boat" days/weeks later.

I will repost my theory from February '08 again:



Quote from: wreck on Today at 03:20:36 PM
I'm going to dig a bigger hole for myself as I think few are following what I'm saying.
1) The Persistence in all likelihood has found Natalee in the trap.
2) They really did not want to expose this just yet. Why? Because they still need to "prove"
the "whys" and "hows". They have a better chance of accomplishing this if the actual "perps"
aren't "clued in."
3) Why the "Dateline" irregularities? Because "Dateline" was already on board and they had to
 keep up "appearances" so they could continue with their "plan."
4) The posting of the pics on the internet put a severe cramp in their plans.
5) Why is trap so big? Because the body disposal did not happen that night as in Joran's story.
 Her body was put there at least a few days later by a bigger boat involving a larger cover-up.
This why they did not reveal their "finding" yet. They want to find out who has that bigger boat.

Once again -- my opinion.

We have waited 3 years -- hold on -- we're almost there!


~~~~~~ (Ocean Explorer:
I also pray that you are right!  Wreck, I like the way you think. 
Wreck, then what are your thoughts on Mos's press release about the FBI results?

Don't know - don't care what Mos says or does. I trusted him up until Thanksgiving time. Never again.

trainwreck .gif =  (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/trainwreck.gif)

1. Yes.
2. Cover-up, corruption, securities fraud.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 03:33:03 AM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop????
Natalee was NOT put in the trap by "the boys." She was put there by a "bigger boat" days/weeks later.

I will repost my theory from February '08 again:



Quote from: wreck on Today at 03:20:36 PM
I'm going to dig a bigger hole for myself as I think few are following what I'm saying.
1) The Persistence in all likelihood has found Natalee in the trap.
2) They really did not want to expose this just yet. Why? Because they still need to "prove"
the "whys" and "hows". They have a better chance of accomplishing this if the actual "perps"
aren't "clued in."
3) Why the "Dateline" irregularities? Because "Dateline" was already on board and they had to
 keep up "appearances" so they could continue with their "plan."
4) The posting of the pics on the internet put a severe cramp in their plans.
5) Why is trap so big? Because the body disposal did not happen that night as in Joran's story.
 Her body was put there at least a few days later by a bigger boat involving a larger cover-up.
This why they did not reveal their "finding" yet. They want to find out who has that bigger boat.

Once again -- my opinion.

We have waited 3 years -- hold on -- we're almost there!


~~~~~~ (Ocean Explorer:
I also pray that you are right!  Wreck, I like the way you think. 
Wreck, then what are your thoughts on Mos's press release about the FBI results?

Don't know - don't care what Mos says or does. I trusted him up until Thanksgiving time. Never again.

trainwreck .gif =  (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/trainwreck.gif)

1. Yes.
2. Cover-up, corruption, securities fraud.

So it is safe to assume that the corrupt will be held accountable after all, right?????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 22, 2008, 05:46:59 AM
Where did they get that hairless fly? Did someone shave it? There's something else wrong, it's sick, see how it turns around and around. Kermie don't put your lips on that thing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 06:59:33 AM
Halliburton being brought up again, tonight, I tried to find the old Valero website, but much is gone....I do know that one rep was there at the time Natalee disappeared....not saying he was involved, personally, but it was something I had researched early.


http://www.valero.com/NewsRoom/BoD/02-Bradford.htm


(http://www.valero.com/NR/rdonlyres/D9109B5B-1A72-49CE-BB00-6F8F682CD6F6/0/bradford.jpg)

 retired Chairman of Halliburton Company

Good Morning! Trying to see if these dots connect? Seems he is called Francis?

Charles Francis Croes
Father of the Bride

John Charles Croes
Best Man

http://legacy.usw.org/usw/program/adminlinks/docs/winter-07_36-37.pdf

http://www.caribbeannetnews.com/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000046/004613.htm




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 07:07:06 AM
John Charles Croes grandfather's name is Carlos Croes.

Does anyone recall the pic of the trash can in Steve Croes grandparent's yard with Carlos Cros written on it?

Thanks in Advance!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 22, 2008, 07:09:30 AM
I have no idea what presence Valero has around the US, I just filled my tank there yesterday. In Texas they took over many/most Shamrock stations years ago. Don't know what you need from Valero but it's not as if it's some dinky oil company local to Aruba's refinery, I already mentioned that a few days back. Online it's www.valero.com.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 07:12:04 AM
Vms…still opening links!

Which Jorge is in the wedding party do you think?

Arnold Solognier…I have seen those Fraduation pics before…Shango maybe?

Thanks in Advance!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 07:18:33 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 07:20:26 AM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 07:35:45 AM
Here are some lingering questions -

Did anyone outside of the Dutch goverment ever see the data from the F-16?

It seemed odd in the beginning that they scanned the water when no one in Aruba seemed to believe the burial at sea idea.  They searched the dunes and found nothing.

What about other targets of interest found in the F-16 data?  Couldn't they have shared that with Persistence?  Even a map?  What exactly does all that F-16 data show?  In my mind, there has to be something.

Isn't it possible that Persistence crew would have known how to use that F-16 data?  Were they ever offered the opportunity?  Were they ever given the data? 

Maybe it was Natalee in that trap, maybe it wasn't.  Why would anyone not want to look at those other targets?  If the FBI has that stuff, where is it?

I recall that the trap was used by the fishermen.  Did they put drugs in the water?  ALE didn't know? 

If Kyle could see the divers at about the spot that he thought the cage was, is it likely that spot was used for drug shipments?  A place that could see from shore?  The same place everytime, and nobody notice?

Who in this case is related to government officials besides Joran?  Guido?  Cousin part of the bank?  Father former high ranking government official or a nobody? 

What bank do the casinos use?  Who owns all those banks in Aruba?  Who owns the casinos? 

Who besides the Aruban people have suffered?  Bank profits?  Casino profits?  Government profits?  Who is related to the banks and casinos (one way or another)?  John Silvetti?  JVDS?  PVDS?  GUIDO?

I'm thinking John Silvetti, Persistence, and the FBI are being made a convenient scapegoat for any coverup.  A convenient reason to STOP searching.  Maybe the FBI could give their information to the family of Natalee so they might find some peace?  A bone fragment?  A skull?  A piece of blouse or skirt?

People lost interest when pictures of that 'skull' were shown.  It is just a bit convenient that the skull appeared like magic, and then disappears over a few days.  Did the fishermen ID that cage?  

The truth is out there and I think some want to create distractions away from a continued search. 

What else is lurking in the water around Aruba?  Business as usual?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: hotping on November 22, 2008, 07:38:26 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!

Mum...I 'm not sure when They were arrested but They are still in Jail...I checked just last night......I will try to call and see if I can get any information.....I'll let You know...... ::MonkeyWink:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 07:40:24 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!

Mum...I 'm not sure when They were arrested but They are still in Jail...I checked just last night......I will try to call and see if I can get any information.....I'll let You know...... ::MonkeyWink:: 


Thanks...Thinking late February! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 07:46:02 AM


WhiskeyGirl…All I could find in the Dr Phil Documents.

Name/Title: Royal Dutch Air Force photograph scans
File No: 1007/2005
Location: Curacao N.A.
Date: 11 July 2005
Pages: 1
Writer/lnitiator: Commander F. Sijtsma
Description: notice regarding photograph scans

Name/Title: Complete report of weather and water stream direction
File No: none
Location: Netherlands Antilles
Date: 12 July 2005
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Agent Mohamed Aqbil Shaiktoestali

Name/Title. Complete report of F 16, Photograph scans
File No: 1007/2005
Location: Curacao N.A
Date: 13 July 2005
Pages: 3
Writer/Initiator: Commander F. Sijtsrna
Description: Report of F 16, Photograph scans


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: hotping on November 22, 2008, 07:56:41 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!

Mum...I 'm not sure when They were arrested but They are still in Jail...I checked just last night......I will try to call and see if I can get any information.....I'll let You know...... ::MonkeyWink:: 


Thanks...Thinking late February! ::MonkeyWink::
The Booking Date is March 7th 2008 in the Hudson County Jail in NJ and then They were booked into the Morris County Jail in NJ Sept 8 2008 no release date is known by the person I spoke with and They did not know what the charges are........ ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 08:08:53 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!

Mum...I 'm not sure when They were arrested but They are still in Jail...I checked just last night......I will try to call and see if I can get any information.....I'll let You know...... ::MonkeyWink:: 


Thanks...Thinking late February! ::MonkeyWink::
The Booking Date is March 7th 2008 in the Hudson County Jail in NJ and then They were booked into the Morris County Jail in NJ Sept 8 2008 no release date is known by the person I spoke with and They did not know what the charges are........ ::MonkeyWink::

March 7th.  ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 08:11:14 AM
Correction from previous post at last thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.920
Dec. 30 Tim Miller was onboard.
He was not onboard for the Jan7th dive.

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #959 on: Today at 03:44:03 PM »
Magnolia, you almost got it.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.940

You don't need to be an account to see how people run a business I think.
Now who was allowed onboard.


This is corruption and a cover-up.
In the words of Robots: "count on it"!



Magnolia
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 1565

OK let's see:
Silvetti and Schaffer were mapping the ocean floor to look
for the best place to lay the pipeline, probably in collusion
with Jossy.
The Persistence did such a good job that they actually
found Natalee in the cage.  But the big boys didn't want
Natalee found.  They had Datelilne on board so it had to
look good.
But, Robin put the pictures out there for us all to see.
Big monkeywrench in the plans.
Dave suddenly hears from the guy in Nigarigua and they
send Tim off with Dave to get them out of the way.
Somebody suggest that Kyle looks tired and needs some
shore time.  All of the good guys are out of the way.
Why was Mos on the boat.  He is no diver he is an office man.
Where did they get the fabric they sent to the FBI?
What did Superior Offshore do with the $152 million?
They sold the big boat before they took possession and it
is now in NL, but he has use of it.
Correct the parts that are wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: hotping on November 22, 2008, 08:13:02 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!

Mum...I 'm not sure when They were arrested but They are still in Jail...I checked just last night......I will try to call and see if I can get any information.....I'll let You know...... ::MonkeyWink:: 


Thanks...Thinking late February! ::MonkeyWink::
The Booking Date is March 7th 2008 in the Hudson County Jail in NJ and then They were booked into the Morris County Jail in NJ Sept 8 2008 no release date is known by the person I spoke with and They did not know what the charges are........ ::MonkeyWink::

March 7th.  ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks
Yep! And there's that September month again that keeps getting mentioned by various Monkeys!  ::MonkeyCool::  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: sharon on November 22, 2008, 08:16:07 AM
So...

blood turns to chocolate and cleaning fluid

all bones that wash onto shore belong to animals

cloth that looks like Natalee's shirt becomes 'fish net'

and skulls turn into ????? pieces of sponge??

And 11 months later NO ONE involved will discuss 'the cage and the contents' ???


Did I miss anything?????


(NO BUGS, BUT BIG HUGS TO MY GREEN FRIEND  ::MonkeyWink:: )














Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 08:17:18 AM
How to explain how any fish trap got into the story, Mariloo. Let me put it this way. Early in the search for Natalee it was said that a fish trap had gone missing from down by those fisherman huts near the Marriott, as well as a few other items, a knife I think and some rope or duct tape or who knows.

The human brain wants to sort out patterns so a bunch of people made up What Ifs, what if Natalee were put into a fish trap, cut up, taped and tied and taken out to sea and dumped.

Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.

Like this one (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 08:26:12 AM


WhiskeyGirl…All I could find in the Dr Phil Documents.

Name/Title: Royal Dutch Air Force photograph scans
File No: 1007/2005
Location: Curacao N.A.
Date: 11 July 2005
Pages: 1
Writer/lnitiator: Commander F. Sijtsma
Description: notice regarding photograph scans

Name/Title: Complete report of weather and water stream direction
File No: none
Location: Netherlands Antilles
Date: 12 July 2005
Pages: 2
Writer/Initiator: Agent Mohamed Aqbil Shaiktoestali

Name/Title. Complete report of F 16, Photograph scans
File No: 1007/2005
Location: Curacao N.A
Date: 13 July 2005
Pages: 3
Writer/Initiator: Commander F. Sijtsrna
Description: Report of F 16, Photograph scans


Thanks Mum.  I didn't know that Dr. Phil asked for these things.  Did he get them is the next question?  What was he hoping to find?

Would the F-16 data show that the trap existed in July 2005?  Or, was the trap placed there at a later time?


Quote
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -
« Reply #740 on: March 18, 2008, 12:22:38 PM » 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
On the issue of Trap recovery:

-After the visual inspection on 30-Dec, the initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap.  There were talks about getting the proper equipment on board the Persistence such as a suction-recovery system to sift small items from the sand.  The talks continued after Jan-7th when the samples were collected.

-Just after the 30th of Dec we were told it would take about 10-14 days to bring in a Dutch team capable of processing an underwater site. 

-Jan 9th through 13th I was off the boat and staying at the Holiday Inn for a much-needed break.  I walked up and down the beach many times a day.  On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.  I talked to a wind surfer instructor who claims to be at the beach every day for 8 years.  He said the boat always comes up the shore just south of where we were standing, turns away and heads offshore.  He said it never goes where it was and has never seen it stop.
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.
  I triangulated it's position the best I could using a wrist watch and a few points on land.  It was right on the target location based on the measurements.

-When I returned to the Persistence (14-Jan) there were no more talks about a trap recovery.  When I pressed the issue, I was told "they're no longer interested in the trap or it's recovery".

-I raised the issue again in early February and the response was the same - no interest about the trap and no plans to recover.

I assume one of three scenarios: 1) They genuinely aren't interested in the trap, 2) They are/were interested and will take care of it themselves (or have already done so) and don't want us informed or involved, or 3) They already recovered the trap (or processed the site) and don't want us to know for whatever reason, good or otherwise.


It sounds to me that for some reason, no one wanted the Americans to know what was in that trap.  What did the FBI find?  Something related to Natalee?  When will the FBI clue in the parents?

Or, the trap/contents were seeded to stop the search, stop the public inquiry into Natalee's death, and help the tourism industry rebound.  Help American's forget about Natalee.  Calculated to bring the good times back to Aruba? 

Business as usual for the drug and money laundering factions?
  How is it that drug and money laundering are possible?  Current administration?  IIRC, Jossy's political group is not a big part of the current administration.  Who would profit by an increase in tourism?  Aruba Today?  The sex trade?  Human trafficking?  Drug dealers?

Who in Aruba wants to get better acquainted with Hugo?  Jossy or Oduber?  I seem to recall that Diario had it's advertising revenue from the government cut off, for some reason...this was previously discussed.

Did Persistence actually map the area between Venezuela and the Valero refinery? 

What would be the point of mapping the northwest area off of Aruba for a pipeline?  So they could build a new refinery?  New oil transfer point?  That just doesn't make sense to me.   ::MonkeyConfused::

It could have been a real skull, and a shoe, and who knows what else.  It may have been Natalee, it may have been someone else and their shoe.  Who knows how many people are lost in the water around Aruba.  Would Aruba want to be known as the island surrounded by dead bodies?  Bones washing up on the beaches daily?  Due to illegal aliens?  Disappeared people?  I can think there are a lot of reasons Aruba wouldn't want any bones to show up on the ocean floor.

just my humble opinions


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 08:58:48 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/avion.jpg)

VP Cheney and Air Force 2 in Aruba????
by Greta Van Susteren

I have received a few emails this morning telling me that VP Dick Cheney, via Air Force 2, is in Aruba……that the plane arrived about 9pm last night and is to leave Monday morning…and that the VP’s security was given permission to carry guns while in Aruba which is routine.  We need security for our leaders when they are out of the country (and in the country, too!!)

Here is one article sent to me which is not helpful…(for obvious reasons) but at least corroborates all the tips I am getting that the VP is in Aruba:


Saturday, 01 March 2008
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Ayeranochi aeropuerto di Aruba tabata tin extra seguridad ora cu Air Force 2, un Boeing C-32 a baha. For di atardi caba tabata papia di e yegada di e avion aki na Aruba, cual ta esun normalmente usa pa transporte di e Vicepresidente di Merca.Polisnan a ser notifica pa extra vigilancia rond di aeropuerto. Asina cu e avion a baha 9′or di diabierna anochi un cantidad di ekipo a ser manda pa duna asistencia na e parti pabao unda e avion a staciona.Tabata papia cu Dick Cheney lo ta abordo di e avion cu henter su propio seguridad cu a haya autorizacion pa cana arma na Aruba.Esnan cu a yega abordo lo bandona Aruba dialuna mainta. Diasabra mainta lo move e avion pa un parti mas pabao cerca di caserne di bombero pasobra aeropuerto ta druk y e avion ta coy hopi espacio.E parti cu ta sera cual avion ta usa pa bay pista lo laga e Air Force 2 para. Riba e foto aki por mira mas di e avion net ora cu el a caba di baha na Aruba.


http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/03/01/air-force-2-in-aruba/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 09:05:30 AM
Who really cares if the water around Aruba was mapped?   I recall much interest early on about what was happening to that data. 

It seems like many, including Europeans were interested in getting the data FREE to "update" their charts.  IF the charts were important, why not offer a fee?  Make a donation to the search?  Offer some free fuel for the search?

Did Persistence really map the area between Valero and Venezuela?

What value would a mapping of the area northwest of the island be for oil interests?  Maybe they'll knock down the lighthouse and put up a new refinery / transfer point?  Blacktop over the dunes?

Can the government US government tax a Chinese big oil company?  Do they tax Hugo?  Who exactly are the big oil companies?

What does that have to do with China looking for oil in Aruba or SA?  Why would China ship all that oil back home?  I'm thinking they have sources much closer, like Iraq and Darfur.

What if the mapping data were later sold to someone?  I believe Louis Schaffer owned the data, not the Persistence, not John Silvetti.  Maybe their are other items of interest?  I recall rumors of a German ship, reported to be lost with lots of gold on board after WWII.  Maybe the next Titanic?

Did Persistence map the area around Valero?  Wasn't Valero up for sale?   That might be an interesting lead to pursue. 

Did the F-16 map around Valero?  SA?

What would be the value of mapping the northwest area of the island for a pipeline?  I just don't see the Persistence / pipeline connection.

I do see that someone may have wanted the 'skull & shoe' pictures to be broadcast to the public.  I also believe they may have intended that the contents of the 'trap' never would be made public.  Perhaps just an effort to get people to 'moveon'.

just my humble opinions



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:14:14 AM
Can I ask this question? What if it was Natalee and the coverup was to get her to the US FBI. When Robin posted those pictures, that's when it came out in the open. Well, could this be the case and why no one will tell what the FBI did test?

The FBI testing results were sent to MOS and he said that they tested the fabric, and it did not match her "blouse"  if the fabric was denim, and i believe it was, was it tested against the denim skirt she was wearing? No response (nor testing?) regarding the skirt at all.  I think that is what OE was saying since the results were  shared.   he said what MOS said was truthful, but there were lots of buts there in my opinion.....What the Aruba authority's asked to be tested were the fabric against the blouse, no match. they did not ask for the skirt to be tested.  MOO

But remember, Kyle will NOT comment on the other things that the FBI has tested and what was in the ziplocks? Hmmmmmm!


Kyle did not reveal the ziplocks story that was Private Eye that did that.  So you think Kyle was in on this cover up too with Silvetti?

Why would PI bring up zip locks? 


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.440

March 20, 2008
Private Eye

(snipped)

Kyle- I emailed Beth your concerns and have suggested to her that she contact the appropriate people on the Persistence, including yourself, and attempt to reconcile as best they can the material the crew saw recovered from the cage versus what they received. I specifically mentioned the blue denim and the fact that would be the material of which the skirt was made, and reminded her that the press release said that the material did not match her blouse. I also pointed out that in the December 30 photo there appeared to be a skull and in the January 7, it did not look at all like a skull. But I did think I noticed a second object in one of the zip lock bags that could possibly be the object that resembled a skull, possibly. I am a little amazed that the denim looks remarkably NOT deteriorated. Mostly I was trying to pique her interest to get her to contact the appropriate people. I think Dave worked closely with the owner of the boat, so he may well have already done this. But I know Beth appreciates the heads up, as do I. You are a good man. I did tell her my main concern was that you were concerned, and that I respect and trust your judgment enough for her to investigate this. Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2008, 09:26:38 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/avion.jpg)

VP Cheney and Air Force 2 in Aruba????
by Greta Van Susteren

I have received a few emails this morning telling me that VP Dick Cheney, via Air Force 2, is in Aruba……that the plane arrived about 9pm last night and is to leave Monday morning…and that the VP’s security was given permission to carry guns while in Aruba which is routine.  We need security for our leaders when they are out of the country (and in the country, too!!)

Here is one article sent to me which is not helpful…(for obvious reasons) but at least corroborates all the tips I am getting that the VP is in Aruba:


Saturday, 01 March 2008
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Ayeranochi aeropuerto di Aruba tabata tin extra seguridad ora cu Air Force 2, un Boeing C-32 a baha. For di atardi caba tabata papia di e yegada di e avion aki na Aruba, cual ta esun normalmente usa pa transporte di e Vicepresidente di Merca.Polisnan a ser notifica pa extra vigilancia rond di aeropuerto. Asina cu e avion a baha 9′or di diabierna anochi un cantidad di ekipo a ser manda pa duna asistencia na e parti pabao unda e avion a staciona.Tabata papia cu Dick Cheney lo ta abordo di e avion cu henter su propio seguridad cu a haya autorizacion pa cana arma na Aruba.Esnan cu a yega abordo lo bandona Aruba dialuna mainta. Diasabra mainta lo move e avion pa un parti mas pabao cerca di caserne di bombero pasobra aeropuerto ta druk y e avion ta coy hopi espacio.E parti cu ta sera cual avion ta usa pa bay pista lo laga e Air Force 2 para. Riba e foto aki por mira mas di e avion net ora cu el a caba di baha na Aruba.


http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/03/01/air-force-2-in-aruba/

Thank's for that Air Force II article and picture, Blonde.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:31:25 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!
I agree ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 09:31:25 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/avion.jpg)

VP Cheney and Air Force 2 in Aruba????
by Greta Van Susteren

I have received a few emails this morning telling me that VP Dick Cheney, via Air Force 2, is in Aruba……that the plane arrived about 9pm last night and is to leave Monday morning…and that the VP’s security was given permission to carry guns while in Aruba which is routine.  We need security for our leaders when they are out of the country (and in the country, too!!)

Here is one article sent to me which is not helpful…(for obvious reasons) but at least corroborates all the tips I am getting that the VP is in Aruba:


Saturday, 01 March 2008
ORANJESTAD (AAN): Ayeranochi aeropuerto di Aruba tabata tin extra seguridad ora cu Air Force 2, un Boeing C-32 a baha. For di atardi caba tabata papia di e yegada di e avion aki na Aruba, cual ta esun normalmente usa pa transporte di e Vicepresidente di Merca.Polisnan a ser notifica pa extra vigilancia rond di aeropuerto. Asina cu e avion a baha 9′or di diabierna anochi un cantidad di ekipo a ser manda pa duna asistencia na e parti pabao unda e avion a staciona.Tabata papia cu Dick Cheney lo ta abordo di e avion cu henter su propio seguridad cu a haya autorizacion pa cana arma na Aruba.Esnan cu a yega abordo lo bandona Aruba dialuna mainta. Diasabra mainta lo move e avion pa un parti mas pabao cerca di caserne di bombero pasobra aeropuerto ta druk y e avion ta coy hopi espacio.E parti cu ta sera cual avion ta usa pa bay pista lo laga e Air Force 2 para. Riba e foto aki por mira mas di e avion net ora cu el a caba di baha na Aruba.


http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/03/01/air-force-2-in-aruba/

Thank's for that Air Force II article and picture, Blonde.
Greta was SPECULATING about Cheney being there -- he was not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:35:09 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 09:35:52 AM
Furthermore, I think Greta's "e-mails" came from Renfro and cohorts because THEY assumed it was Cheney. I'm telling you, it was State department/CIA operatives (needing to be armed) there to monitor the  tensions between Venezuela and columbia. That very weekend, they were expecting a Venezuelan excursion into Columbia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 09:42:44 AM
Thank you Kermit for spitting it out finally. I see what you are saying.

John Silvetti was part of a planned cover up to hide the contents of the cage. 

All the Persistence crew was working along with ALE and Hans Mos to aid in this cover up.

The reason John was there had nothing to do with Natalee and she was found by mistake.

Caps and John are in this also by some means> (even though the connection you seem to imply between Caps and John did not exist...it is another person on Aruba that is the connection.)

I truly hope John Silvetti or Kyle or someone connected to Natalee's family will come out and refute your information because I really hate that we have now pitted our good guys against our bad guys. 

This is why nothing ever gets settled here...Kermit I know you think you know...but let me ask you this have you verified any of your information with Dave, Beth or Jug?  If you have...I will know.  Keeping the parents of this child out of the loop on something like this is just cruel.  So I would be happy to forward any and all emails for you to contact them should you wish to give them this information.  They have suffered over this long enough and they should at the least be able to confront Silvetti with these accusations and find out if they are true or not. I await your answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:46:37 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.
Maybe not
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID2.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 09:47:35 AM
How to explain how any fish trap got into the story, Mariloo. Let me put it this way. Early in the search for Natalee it was said that a fish trap had gone missing from down by those fisherman huts near the Marriott, as well as a few other items, a knife I think and some rope or duct tape or who knows.

The human brain wants to sort out patterns so a bunch of people made up What Ifs, what if Natalee were put into a fish trap, cut up, taped and tied and taken out to sea and dumped.

Be glad it wasn't a missing rhinocerous, a dinner plate, blue beads and seven orange bicycles.

Like this one (http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID2.jpg)

Wouldn't that trap be a bit smaller than the one on the ocean floor? It seems to have different dimensions.  I can't tell from the underwater photos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 09:48:53 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 09:55:05 AM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!
I agree ::MonkeyCool::

So do I and Kermit has not always been right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: sharon on November 22, 2008, 09:55:05 AM
Thank you Kermit for spitting it out finally. I see what you are saying.

John Silvetti was part of a planned cover up to hide the contents of the cage. 

All the Persistence crew was working along with ALE and Hans Mos to aid in this cover up.

The reason John was there had nothing to do with Natalee and she was found by mistake.

Caps and John are in this also by some means> (even though the connection you seem to imply between Caps and John did not exist...it is another person on Aruba that is the connection.)

I truly hope John Silvetti or Kyle or someone connected to Natalee's family will come out and refute your information because I really hate that we have now pitted our good guys against our bad guys. 

This is why nothing ever gets settled here...Kermit I know you think you know...but let me ask you this have you verified any of your information with Dave, Beth or Jug?  If you have...I will know.  Keeping the parents of this child out of the loop on something like this is just cruel.  So I would be happy to forward any and all emails for you to contact them should you wish to give them this information.  They have suffered over this long enough and they should at the least be able to confront Silvetti with these accusations and find out if they are true or not. I await your answers.

I'm certainly not the frog, but my guess would be that kermie needs no help contacting the family.

jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2008, 09:59:01 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

Lala, you said pitted our good guys against our bay guys.
Who are our good guys and who are our bad guys?
I don't understand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 22, 2008, 10:00:50 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.

Blonde, is it possible to repost your pics?
Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 22, 2008, 10:05:27 AM
Wreck - that's correct.  I believe it turned out to be a homeland security meeting some (not Cheney) were attending.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 22, 2008, 10:10:18 AM
Wreck - that's correct.  I believe it turned out to be a homeland security meeting some (not Cheney) were attending.

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/03/01/is-vice-president-dick-cheney-in-aruba-air-force-2-lands-in-aruba-us-homeland-security-hugo-chavez/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 10:14:29 AM
Thank you Kermit for spitting it out finally. I see what you are saying.

John Silvetti was part of a planned cover up to hide the contents of the cage. 

All the Persistence crew was working along with ALE and Hans Mos to aid in this cover up.

The reason John was there had nothing to do with Natalee and she was found by mistake.

Caps and John are in this also by some means> (even though the connection you seem to imply between Caps and John did not exist...it is another person on Aruba that is the connection.)

I truly hope John Silvetti or Kyle or someone connected to Natalee's family will come out and refute your information because I really hate that we have now pitted our good guys against our bad guys. 

This is why nothing ever gets settled here...Kermit I know you think you know...but let me ask you this have you verified any of your information with Dave, Beth or Jug?  If you have...I will know.  Keeping the parents of this child out of the loop on something like this is just cruel.  So I would be happy to forward any and all emails for you to contact them should you wish to give them this information.  They have suffered over this long enough and they should at the least be able to confront Silvetti with these accusations and find out if they are true or not. I await your answers.

I'm certainly not the frog, but my guess would be that kermie needs no help contacting the family.

jmo

Funny, I just spoke with one family member and they have yet to talk to Kermit.  They are waiting for his call. They are most interested in meeting and seeing this information. Can you imagine how big this would be to be able to put Silvetti and ALE and Mos in cahoots over this entire search?  That would be massive in the implications and further legal action could indeed bring a lot of information to light.  Even the Kalpoes would benefit from this knowledge...it would almost cement a verdict in their favor of being victims.  Once you peel a layer of the cover up away..then all the other layers are visible. 

When I was privy to information I thought would offer some help in finding Natalee....I shared it with the family.  I didn't think twice about it...I simply sent them the information and they made up their mind about the validity of it all.  I think Kermit should certainly do the same.  It's the right thing to do...they should be able to know as many of their enemies as possible. 

In fact, I am surprised that JR has not run with this information...to be able to accuse an American of treachery is right up her alley...what is her paper waiting for?  She can say ALE and Mos were taken in by the devious Americans for the very things we have accused them of....it's a win win situation for her and her cronies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 10:14:47 AM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!

Tim went to
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/Managua.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 10:18:46 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

Lala, you said pitted our good guys against our bay guys.
Who are our good guys and who are our bad guys?
I don't understand.

I suppose it's a matter of perspective at this point.  I am not trying to change anyone's mind...in fact, mine may change in the next hour or week..but I do not think Caps, John, or Kyle were in any way the bad guys here.  Each in their own way were trying to help find Natalee.  I am sure if you delved into my background as some have Silvetti's you would be unhappy with the results also...but it does not make you a bad guy just because you are having financial difficulty or drink too much or whatever else is there.  Human beings are not flawless.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 10:25:01 AM
Johan,

Have you told us all that Peter said about Renee Gielen?  If not please tell all!   ::MonkeyCool::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 10:27:04 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.

Blonde, is it possible to repost your pics?
Thanks
YES  this is how it was in Aruba Bay video 24
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/pondbag.jpg)
I rotated it.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/flipped.jpg)
Then click negitve
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/bag3.jpg)
The croped
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/IthinkitsNat-1.jpg)

Please Note screen overlay affect happened when I hit magnify  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 10:27:05 AM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!

Tim went to
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/Managua.jpg)


Blonde...I don't have time to check Kyle's posts right now, and I will in a bit, but I am pretty sure in one post that Kyle said Tim went to Costa Rica.

It surprised me as I have looked at various Costa Rico connections.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 22, 2008, 10:30:20 AM
I guess I couldn't help myself so I went to thinking about geography and where this imaginary pipeline could be headed to or from *northwest* of Aruba.

Haiti?

Jamaica?

Cuba?
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 10:34:34 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

Lala, you said pitted our good guys against our bay guys.
Who are our good guys and who are our bad guys?
I don't understand.

I suppose it's a matter of perspective at this point.  I am not trying to change anyone's mind...in fact, mine may change in the next hour or week..but I do not think Caps, John, or Kyle were in any way the bad guys here.  Each in their own way were trying to help find Natalee.  I am sure if you delved into my background as some have Silvetti's you would be unhappy with the results also...but it does not make you a bad guy just because you are having financial difficulty or drink too much or whatever else is there.  Human beings are not flawless.
I think Kyle may be a "dupee" not a "dupor". I have no feel for Caps or Silvetti. My gut says Kermit is a "big fish frog".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 10:34:47 AM
Thank you Kermit for spitting it out finally. I see what you are saying.

John Silvetti was part of a planned cover up to hide the contents of the cage. 

All the Persistence crew was working along with ALE and Hans Mos to aid in this cover up.

The reason John was there had nothing to do with Natalee and she was found by mistake.

Caps and John are in this also by some means> (even though the connection you seem to imply between Caps and John did not exist...it is another person on Aruba that is the connection.)

I truly hope John Silvetti or Kyle or someone connected to Natalee's family will come out and refute your information because I really hate that we have now pitted our good guys against our bad guys. 

This is why nothing ever gets settled here...Kermit I know you think you know...but let me ask you this have you verified any of your information with Dave, Beth or Jug?  If you have...I will know.  Keeping the parents of this child out of the loop on something like this is just cruel.  So I would be happy to forward any and all emails for you to contact them should you wish to give them this information.  They have suffered over this long enough and they should at the least be able to confront Silvetti with these accusations and find out if they are true or not. I await your answers.

I'm certainly not the frog, but my guess would be that kermie needs no help contacting the family.

jmo

Funny, I just spoke with one family member and they have yet to talk to Kermit.  They are waiting for his call. They are most interested in meeting and seeing this information. Can you imagine how big this would be to be able to put Silvetti and ALE and Mos in cahoots over this entire search?  That would be massive in the implications and further legal action could indeed bring a lot of information to light.  Even the Kalpoes would benefit from this knowledge...it would almost cement a verdict in their favor of being victims.  Once you peel a layer of the cover up away..then all the other layers are visible. 

When I was privy to information I thought would offer some help in finding Natalee....I shared it with the family.  I didn't think twice about it...I simply sent them the information and they made up their mind about the validity of it all.  I think Kermit should certainly do the same.  It's the right thing to do...they should be able to know as many of their enemies as possible. 

In fact, I am surprised that JR has not run with this information...to be able to accuse an American of treachery is right up her alley...what is her paper waiting for?  She can say ALE and Mos were taken in by the devious Americans for the very things we have accused them of....it's a win win situation for her and her cronies.

Good morning everyone,

I see that Kermit was in last night. 

I am very interested in the angle of Securities Fraud.  If that investigation is ongoing, it may be the reason the whole story is not out.  I guess we'll have to see.  In any case, a Securities Fraud investigation is a follow-the-money investigation and has the ability to cross lines of information that others may not......very far-reaching investigative power.

I'm kind of disappointed that Greta's big story is an interview with Joran.  Guess it depends on what he blabs now.  The fact that there seems to be documentation that could be subpoenaed, maybe transaction info, seems hopeful.

 :bball: :bball: :bball: Guess we'll see.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 10:38:35 AM
Helenback:
Quote
I am very interested in the angle of Securities Fraud.  If that investigation is ongoing, it may be the reason the whole story is not out.  I guess we'll have to see.  In any case, a Securities Fraud investigation is a follow-the-money investigation and has the ability to cross lines of information that others may not......very far-reaching investigative power
.
I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 10:39:54 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

Lala, you said pitted our good guys against our bay guys.
Who are our good guys and who are our bad guys?
I don't understand.

I suppose it's a matter of perspective at this point.  I am not trying to change anyone's mind...in fact, mine may change in the next hour or week..but I do not think Caps, John, or Kyle were in any way the bad guys here.  Each in their own way were trying to help find Natalee.  I am sure if you delved into my background as some have Silvetti's you would be unhappy with the results also...but it does not make you a bad guy just because you are having financial difficulty or drink too much or whatever else is there.  Human beings are not flawless.
I think Kyle may be a "dupee" not a "dupor". I have no feel for Caps or Silvetti. My gut says Kermit is a "big fish frog".

I agree.  My gut feeling is the same.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 10:40:30 AM
Wreck, LOL

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 22, 2008, 10:40:31 AM
Thanks Blonde.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 10:43:21 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!




Good Morning Mum,

This one was not far from me.  I will look for the links, but this is the general information.  Ramona Tejera-Rodiriguez was arrested while waiting for a bus at a mall in Secaucus, Hudson County, NJ, in early February.  On the same day, a younger woman with the last name of Tejera was arrested over in the Bronx at the apartment she shared with her boyfriend.  We had a photograph of Ramona, and you and I posted some photographs of the drug loot taken from the Bronx apt.  Both women were charged with possession of 8 kilos.  One newspaper said that this was a drug bust involving the multiple jurisdictions.

Caps tipped us off about the Daury Rodriguez arrest.  It was a month later, in early March.  It supposedly happened at the airport, but I don't know for sure because Newark Liberty is in Essex County and he was originally arrested in Hudson County.  He was reportedly coming to NJ for a gambling competition.  He also had possession of 8 kilos.  He and Ramona were put in the Hudson County Correctional Facility in Kearny, Hudson County.  Not too long ago, someone checked on their status and Daury was in Morris County.  I can't explain it except that sometimes prisons in this area take "boarders".  It's a source of income for the prison budgets.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 10:49:25 AM
Found it...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 08:22:14 PM »

Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 10:55:21 AM
John Charles Croes grandfather's name is Carlos Croes.

Does anyone recall the pic of the trash can in Steve Croes grandparent's yard with Carlos Cros written on it?

Thanks in Advance!




Yes Mum, there was a big blue trash can in Grandma Croes' driveway where Steve was living.  The name on the trashcan was Carlos Croes.  We couldn't figure out who he was.  Does this mean that Carlos Croes could also be the son of Grandma Croes and she borrowed her son's trash can?  If so, then Rufo Solgnier's wife, Steve's father Hendrick (not the big Hendrick), and Carlos Croes are all siblings?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2008, 10:56:45 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

Lala, you said pitted our good guys against our bay guys.
Who are our good guys and who are our bad guys?
I don't understand.

I suppose it's a matter of perspective at this point.  I am not trying to change anyone's mind...in fact, mine may change in the next hour or week..but I do not think Caps, John, or Kyle were in any way the bad guys here.  Each in their own way were trying to help find Natalee.  I am sure if you delved into my background as some have Silvetti's you would be unhappy with the results also...but it does not make you a bad guy just because you are having financial difficulty or drink too much or whatever else is there.  Human beings are not flawless.

It is had for me to believe that Kyle was a part of anything
underhanded.  I think they needed his skills and he was much
better at his trade than anyone anticipated.
I don't know what to think of Caps, but he has told some
good stories. I like him, but some of his stuff has been
pretty unbelievable.
Silvitti...money does strange things to some men.  I don't know
him in any way, so cannot pass judgement except for all of the
finincial details that are online  That raises an eyebrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 22, 2008, 11:05:10 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!




Good Morning Mum,

This one was not far from me.  I will look for the links, but this is the general information.  Ramona Tejera-Rodiriguez was arrested while waiting for a bus at a mall in Secaucus, Hudson County, NJ, in early February.  On the same day, a younger woman with the last name of Tejera was arrested over in the Bronx at the apartment she shared with her boyfriend.  We had a photograph of Ramona, and you and I posted some photographs of the drug loot taken from the Bronx apt.  Both women were charged with possession of 8 kilos.  One newspaper said that this was a drug bust involving the multiple jurisdictions.

Caps tipped us off about the Daury Rodriguez arrest.  It was a month later, in early March.  It supposedly happened at the airport, but I don't know for sure because Newark Liberty is in Essex County and he was originally arrested in Hudson County.  He was reportedly coming to NJ for a gambling competition.  He also had possession of 8 kilos.  He and Ramona were put in the Hudson County Correctional Facility in Kearny, Hudson County.  Not too long ago, someone checked on their status and Daury was in Morris County.  I can't explain it except that sometimes prisons in this area take "boarders".  It's a source of income for the prison budgets.

Quote from: Pita on April 10, 2008, 07:09:44 PM
I wonder if this has any relevance:

Cops: Woman busted in Secaucus with $500K in heroin
by Michaelangelo Conte
Thursday January 10, 2008, 7:19 PM

(http://blog.nj.com/hudsoncountynow_impact/2008/01/large_ZRRODR.jpg)
                           
                                                      Pamela Suchy
Ramona Rodriguez-Tejada is arraigned via video link this morning from the Hudson County jail in Kearny.

An Aruban woman was busted with eight kilograms of heroin as she boarded a bus at the Harmon Cove Mall in Secaucus yesterday and police say she was connected to an international trafficking network with ties to Holland.

A distraught Ramona Rodriguez-Tejeda, 49, made her first appearance yesterday at Central Judicial Processing Court in Jersey City on drug distribution charges. She could face up to 20 years in prison, said Lt. Mark Kelly, commander of the State Police Drug Traffic Unit in Newark.

She appeared in court via video link from Hudson County jail in Kearny and she was so distraught during the appearance that she was later taken away for medical attention. He bail was set at $1 million cash only by state Superior Court Judge Kevin Callahan.

Kelly said the heroin has a wholesale value of about $520,000 but once processed and packaged for sale on the streets it will be worth twice that much.

Rodriguez-Tejeda, who also uses an address in Brooklyn, was charged with first-degree
possession of illegal drugs and first-degree possession with attempt to distribute, said Kelly.

Kelly declined to specify how troopers learned of the shipment.

http://www.nj.com/hudsoncountynow/index.ssf/2008/01/cops_woman_busted_in_secaucus.html




 
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 11:09:57 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.
Maybe not
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID2.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID1.jpg)





Blone - I think the cage in your picture is like the one from the fisherman's huts.  According to the dimensions from Dr. Hodge, it is about the size of a queen size bed mattress and it can be lifted by one or two people.  The cage that Persistance found was a huge commerical trap that required a crane.  If Natalee had been put in that commercial trap, it would have required a diver to put her remains in there.  Are Urine or his friends divers?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 11:10:10 AM
John Charles Croes grandfather's name is Carlos Croes.

Does anyone recall the pic of the trash can in Steve Croes grandparent's yard with Carlos Cros written on it?

Thanks in Advance!




Yes Mum, there was a big blue trash can in Grandma Croes' driveway where Steve was living.  The name on the trashcan was Carlos Croes.  We couldn't figure out who he was.  Does this mean that Carlos Croes could also be the son of Grandma Croes and she borrowed her son's trash can?  If so, then Rufo Solgnier's wife, Steve's father Hendrick (not the big Hendrick), and Carlos Croes are all siblings?


Hi SS...Not sure what it means...Maybe Rufo lied about who lived next door...Maybe It wasn't his wife's parents that lived there...I know we followed an Obit in Shango to try and work out who was who.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 11:12:11 AM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!

Tim went to
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/Managua.jpg)


Blonde...I don't have time to check Kyle's posts right now, and I will in a bit, but I am pretty sure in one post that Kyle said Tim went to Costa Rica.

It surprised me as I have looked at various Costa Rico connections.


oceanexploration
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 218

           Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 08:22:14 PM »   Quote Modify Remove Split Topic



Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.


Yes he did say that, but Ithought he may have gotten confused   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 11:13:01 AM
Pita,

Do you have any recollection of crab trap pictures being posted by John's sister at BFN?
I was told that she did not. ..that the pictures she posted, provided to her by her brother, were of the Persistence in route from Aruba to the U.S.

TIA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: sharon on November 22, 2008, 11:13:32 AM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

Lala, you said pitted our good guys against our bay guys.
Who are our good guys and who are our bad guys?
I don't understand.

I suppose it's a matter of perspective at this point.  I am not trying to change anyone's mind...in fact, mine may change in the next hour or week..but I do not think Caps, John, or Kyle were in any way the bad guys here.  Each in their own way were trying to help find Natalee.  I am sure if you delved into my background as some have Silvetti's you would be unhappy with the results also...but it does not make you a bad guy just because you are having financial difficulty or drink too much or whatever else is there.  Human beings are not flawless.
I think Kyle may be a "dupee" not a "dupor". I have no feel for Caps or Silvetti. My gut says Kermit is a "big fish frog".

I agree.  My gut feeling is the same.



Mine, too.

Aruba....the Master Dupor


Avoid Aruba as if your life depends on it....it does!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 11:14:31 AM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!

Tim went to
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/Managua.jpg)


Blonde...I don't have time to check Kyle's posts right now, and I will in a bit, but I am pretty sure in one post that Kyle said Tim went to Costa Rica.

It surprised me as I have looked at various Costa Rico connections.


oceanexploration
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 218

           Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 08:22:14 PM »   Quote Modify Remove Split Topic



Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.


Yes he did say that, but Ithought he may have gotten confused   ::MonkeyConfused::
"IF I Recall Correctly"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 11:14:56 AM
Sharon
I am very sorry that previous post sounded so inappropriate toward you.  It was never meant to be that way.  I should have left out your quote since you had nothing to do with it.  Please accept my apologies...your efforts have always been for Natalee and I am truly sorry it appeared that I was directing that toward you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 11:16:18 AM
I keep hoping that a big fish or frog will someday make a documentary and tell everyone just what the "FBI knows", and just what all the "follow the money" signs reveal and about other disturbing things.  I remain clueless. 

Maybe a tell all documentary to rival RG?

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 11:20:37 AM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!

Tim went to
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/Managua.jpg)


Blonde...I don't have time to check Kyle's posts right now, and I will in a bit, but I am pretty sure in one post that Kyle said Tim went to Costa Rica.

It surprised me as I have looked at various Costa Rico connections.


oceanexploration
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 218

           Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 08:22:14 PM »   Quote Modify Remove Split Topic



Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.


Yes he did say that, but Ithought he may have gotten confused   ::MonkeyConfused::


Blonde...Hope Kyle comes back so we can check on it! I will be in and out, but will keep an eye open for him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 11:21:57 AM
I'm going to throw out a thought that is just something that I have considered from time to time.  I don't really believe that those boys put a fish trap on Sander's boat and took it out to sea.  It's just physically too difficult.  What if, someone had screwed a drug dealer and his body was put into the trap as a warning for those who were making the next pickup.  It's just a thought.
Maybe not
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID2.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/FHTRAPVID1.jpg)





Blone - I think the cage in your picture is like the one from the fisherman's huts.  According to the dimensions from Dr. Hodge, it is about the size of a queen size bed mattress and it can be lifted by one or two people.  The cage that Persistance found was a huge commerical trap that required a crane.  If Natalee had been put in that commercial trap, it would have required a diver to put her remains in there.  Are Urine or his friends divers?


Yes I know I was jut putting it out there. My head is. ::MonkeyConfused::

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/placing-pots-2-l.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: sharon on November 22, 2008, 11:23:39 AM
Sharon
I am very sorry that previous post sounded so inappropriate toward you.  It was never meant to be that way.  I should have left out your quote since you had nothing to do with it.  Please accept my apologies...your efforts have always been for Natalee and I am truly sorry it appeared that I was directing that toward you.

No probs Lala's

We all want justice for Natalee

There is bound to be disagreement amongst brilliant minds   :smt058

Keeps us all 'discussing' as we all stand with the girl.

 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 11:23:58 AM
Thanks Pita and SS on the Romona info...Interesting timing on all of that.

Wreck...Just want to be sure...LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2008, 11:26:01 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.

Blonde, can you show us those photos again please?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 11:27:42 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.

Blonde, can you show us those photos again please?
She re-posted them just a few pages back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 11:28:46 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.

Blonde, can you show us those photos again please?
She re-posted them just a few pages back.
(page 20 near bottom)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 11:28:48 AM
Hotping, TM or SS

Where are Daury Rodriguez and Romona Del Carmen Rodriguez?

When were they arrested, do you know?

Thanks in Advance!




Good Morning Mum,

This one was not far from me.  I will look for the links, but this is the general information.  Ramona Tejera-Rodiriguez was arrested while waiting for a bus at a mall in Secaucus, Hudson County, NJ, in early February.  On the same day, a younger woman with the last name of Tejera was arrested over in the Bronx at the apartment she shared with her boyfriend.  We had a photograph of Ramona, and you and I posted some photographs of the drug loot taken from the Bronx apt.  Both women were charged with possession of 8 kilos.  One newspaper said that this was a drug bust involving the multiple jurisdictions.

Caps tipped us off about the Daury Rodriguez arrest.  It was a month later, in early March.  It supposedly happened at the airport, but I don't know for sure because Newark Liberty is in Essex County and he was originally arrested in Hudson County.  He was reportedly coming to NJ for a gambling competition.  He also had possession of 8 kilos.  He and Ramona were put in the Hudson County Correctional Facility in Kearny, Hudson County.  Not too long ago, someone checked on their status and Daury was in Morris County.  I can't explain it except that sometimes prisons in this area take "boarders".  It's a source of income for the prison budgets.

Quote from: Pita on April 10, 2008, 07:09:44 PM
I wonder if this has any relevance:

Cops: Woman busted in Secaucus with $500K in heroin
by Michaelangelo Conte
Thursday January 10, 2008, 7:19 PM

(http://blog.nj.com/hudsoncountynow_impact/2008/01/large_ZRRODR.jpg)
                           
                                                      Pamela Suchy
Ramona Rodriguez-Tejada is arraigned via video link this morning from the Hudson County jail in Kearny.

An Aruban woman was busted with eight kilograms of heroin as she boarded a bus at the Harmon Cove Mall in Secaucus yesterday and police say she was connected to an international trafficking network with ties to Holland.

A distraught Ramona Rodriguez-Tejeda, 49, made her first appearance yesterday at Central Judicial Processing Court in Jersey City on drug distribution charges. She could face up to 20 years in prison, said Lt. Mark Kelly, commander of the State Police Drug Traffic Unit in Newark.

She appeared in court via video link from Hudson County jail in Kearny and she was so distraught during the appearance that she was later taken away for medical attention. He bail was set at $1 million cash only by state Superior Court Judge Kevin Callahan.

Kelly said the heroin has a wholesale value of about $520,000 but once processed and packaged for sale on the streets it will be worth twice that much.

Rodriguez-Tejeda, who also uses an address in Brooklyn, was charged with first-degree
possession of illegal drugs and first-degree possession with attempt to distribute, said Kelly.

Kelly declined to specify how troopers learned of the shipment.

http://www.nj.com/hudsoncountynow/index.ssf/2008/01/cops_woman_busted_in_secaucus.html




 
 
 
 





Wow, it was January and not February.


Another big what if ....  What if everything Caps told us about the cage being used as a post office was true.  Heroin came from Colombia to Aruba and then outward from there.  What if they did find some drugs in the cage and just left them there so that they could trace the trail?  A few days later Ramona and someone who appears to be her daughter are arrested in NJ and NY.  Does anyone see anything that resembles heroin in that cage picture?  In the pictures of the loot that NYC police had it looked like packages.  Wouldn't it be great if Ramona, her daughter, and Daury were all eventually arrested because of something from the post office cage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 22, 2008, 11:30:05 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.


Blonde, is it possible to repost your pics?
Thanks
YES  this is how it was in Aruba Bay video 24
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/pondbag.jpg)
I rotated it.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/flipped.jpg)
Then click negitve
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/bag3.jpg)
The croped
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/IthinkitsNat-1.jpg)

Please Note screen overlay affect happened when I hit magnify  


Blonde,

Where was the location of this plastic bag to the hotel area?

Deepak stated in his PV that they stopped the car so he could take a leak (even tho in another of his PV's he said he took a leak inside C&C).

Satish stated that he told Deepak to 'stop the car' so he could toss out his yard long drinking cup he took from C&C. 

It's obvious that the Kalpoes were on the road and did in fact stop their car and had to make reasons for stopping the car - one to explain why the car was stopped and he got out, and the other to explain why the car was stopped just in general.

Deepak and Joran then got out of the car.

Joran said "I picked her up and carried her..." 

Did he carry her in his arms while she was in this plastic bag and place her in that spot?   

(Did a fisherman say he saw Deepaks car and saw joran carrying something and swimming out into the ocean?)

 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 11:32:14 AM
I saved this probably in the last month from one of the papers, sorry I don't know much more than that.  It may not be the one everyone's talking about and may not provide any more information than is already known.  Just thought someone might be interested.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/CarlosNicolaasCroes.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 22, 2008, 11:33:28 AM
Pita,

Do you have any recollection of crab trap pictures being posted by John's sister at BFN?
I was told that she did not. ..that the pictures she posted, provided to her by her brother, were of the Persistence in route from Aruba to the U.S.

TIA.

IIRC, there were NEVER any crap trap pictures posted by LegallyLex at BFN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2008, 11:34:28 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.

Blonde, can you show us those photos again please?
She re-posted them just a few pages back.
(page 20 near bottom)

Thanks,  I didn't go back far enough.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 11:41:47 AM
Did you ever condider that Blonde's plactic bag photos
were acutally what they seemed and were waiting there
to be picked up and be put into the fish trap?


I have always thought they were waiting for someone to get them.


Blonde, is it possible to repost your pics?
Thanks
YES  this is how it was in Aruba Bay video 24
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/pondbag.jpg)
I rotated it.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/flipped.jpg)
Then click negitve
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/bag3.jpg)
The croped
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/IthinkitsNat-1.jpg)

Please Note screen overlay affect happened when I hit magnify  


Blonde,

Where was the location of this plastic bag to the hotel area?

Deepak stated in his PV that they stopped the car so he could take a leak (even tho in another of his PV's he said he took a leak inside C&C).

Satish stated that he told Deepak to 'stop the car' so he could toss out his yard long drinking cup he took from C&C. 

It's obvious that the Kalpoes were on the road and did in fact stop their car and had to make reasons for stopping the car - one to explain why the car was stopped and he got out, and the other to explain why the car was stopped just in general.

Deepak and Joran then got out of the car.

Joran said "I picked her up and carried her..." 

Did he carry her in his arms while she was in this plastic bag and place her in that spot?   

(Did a fisherman say he saw Deepaks car and saw joran carrying something and swimming out into the ocean?)

 

Map by Klaas
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Video%2024/whitebaglocation.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 11:42:21 AM
I saved this probably in the last month from one of the papers, sorry I don't know much more than that.  It may not be the one everyone's talking about and may not provide any more information than is already known.  Just thought someone might be interested.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/CarlosNicolaasCroes.jpg)


Thanks TM...I hope Finbar is lurking and can connect some dots with these Croes.

BTW...Did you open the Wedding link from page 1, that vms found...There is a Jorge Porras in the wedding party...Do you recall the discussion in Shango from the Dr. Phil Documents regarding that name?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 11:48:17 AM
Pita,

Do you have any recollection of crab trap pictures being posted by John's sister at BFN?
I was told that she did not. ..that the pictures she posted, provided to her by her brother, were of the Persistence in route from Aruba to the U.S.

TIA.

IIRC, there were NEVER any crap trap pictures posted by LegallyLex at BFN.

Robin posted them at BNH and someone took them and sent them to Klaas and RU.
I got accused of this, because I was logged in BNH for one minute  that day. I did not even see them until Klass posted them.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 11:53:59 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/maps/bagwas.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 22, 2008, 12:06:22 PM
http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/11/22/why-is-holland-protecting-aruba/


November 22nd, 2008 11:58 AM Eastern
why is Holland protecting Aruba?
by Greta Van Susteren
When you watch On The Record Monday at ten pm, you will want to know many things…including why is Holland protecting Aruba? Is it indifference? Or worse, cover up?


Comments?

--------

The above was just posted on Greta's blog.  Guess it is a sort of preview for Monday night's big expose?

That is all it says plus the comments section.  If this has already been posted, I apologize as I have not read back very far.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:07:33 PM
 Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4 - 4/11/08
« Reply #982 on: April 11, 2008, 03:51:03 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a link to a photograph of the confiscated heroin and guns from the house in the Bronx.  For some reason, the photograph is dated January 9th. 


http://www.1010wins.com/pages/1453659.php?

Police Bust 'Sophisticated' Heroin Ring in the Bronx

 
NEW YORK (AP)  -- Two people were arrested Wednesday and $500,000 worth of heroin has been seized in the Bronx.

Edwin Cruz, 31, and his girlfriend Lucilla Tejada, 36, were operating a sophisticated mom and pop operation distributing heroin in the Bronx and Upper Manhattan, police said.

1010 WINS AUDIO: Terry Sheridan Reports

Loaded guns, a heroin press and branding stamps were found in the couple's Sedwick Ave. apartment, police said.

The couple's heroin was allegedly stamped "Mercedes."

Photos from 1010 WINS' Terry Sheridan

********

 Re: Natalee Case Discussion #747 4/11 -
« Reply #827 on: April 16, 2008, 06:20:09 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just an update...

Edwin (Armani) Cruz, Lucilla Tejada
Edwin (Armani) Cruz, 31, and his girlfriend, Lucilla Tejada, 36.
Both face felony drug possession and numerous weapons charges.
The arrests came after several weeks of investigation by the NYPD's Bronx gang squad.
Police said Cruz and Tejada are not gang members, but identified them as part of a larger drug organization with the drugs and weapons meant for distribution on the streets of upper Manhattan and the Bronx.
"This was a substantial bust," said Deputy Chief Robert Boyce, commander of the Citywide Gang Unit. "I think we put a nice dent in this operation."
Officers descended on the home at 3343 Sedgwick Ave. at 8:35 a.m., cops said, catching Cruz and Tejada while they were still sleeping. They were arrested without incident.
Police found the heroin, wrapped in red cellophane, stuffed in an empty vacuum box in the living room. Seven handguns were stuffed in a black book bag, and two others were found in a drawer, police said..
"These are high-quality, expensive guns," Boyce said. "[Cruz and Tejada] are not ordinary drug pushers."
Police also seized drug paraphernalia, along with 25 rubber stamps for marking glassine envelopes used to hold street-level amounts of heroin.
Among the "brand names" for the heroin packets were "Survivor" and "Mercedes-Benz."
Police said Cruz has an arrest record on charges of robbery, criminal possession of a weapon and felony possession. His parole ended in August 2006.
Tejada has no criminal history, they said.
The weapons consisted of two 9-mm. handguns, three .40-caliber handguns, one .38-caliber Smith & Wesson handgun, one .32-caliber Taurus handgun, one Ruger and one Mac-11.
http://drugenforcement.blogspot.com/2008_01_01_archive.html 

*****

Here is a link to a thread that was started about Daury Rodriguez.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2783.0

*******


OK, here's another what if scenario.  Kyle discovered the trap on the screen very early Christmas morning.  That picture we have of ALE meeting with Persistence was taken on January 30th.  Does anyone see anything that looks like heroin in the trap picture?  There's some stuff towards the back, but I can't tell what it is.  What if there were packages of Heroin in that trap that were destined for Arub, to Holland, to NY?  The one newspaper article identifies the heroin as coming from Holland.  Perhaps ALE decided on the 30th to leave the contents of the trap alone and just follow the pickup and distribution in a huge drug sting that also involved the US DEA.  Ramona and Lucy were under arrest by the first week of January and ALE cleaned the trap on January 7th.  I have assumed that the Coast Guard ship was there on the 11th and 12th to lift the cage out of the water with a crane.  Once the arrests were made, they could have removed the post office.  Caps could be absolutely correct with his information about the trap being a post office.  Did Urine use Daury's name in Patrick's video because Daury had maybe double crossed some Aruban drug dealers that were friends of Urine? Caps told us that the night Natalee died, there was also a big drug transfer going on.  Some of the people at Matty were also involved in the drug transfer.  So, the people at Matty and the people in the drug deal were also friends of Urine.  Was Urine trying to put some heat on Daury?  These are just thoughts.

Remember there are no coincidences!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 12:12:38 PM
Has anyone seen Joran today?  Does Thailand even care that he's on the run?  I wonder if he's still alive? 

gbmw yesterday

The Thai embassy said yesterday: “There’s something going on...”

This is  coming from the Thai embassy in The Hague:
Joran was already kept an eye on in Thailand prior to the broadcast of Peter R. de Vries; actually since he arrived there since they were aware of him & Natalee Holloway. There hasn't been an arrest yet but he is watched very closely.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 12:21:48 PM
Pita,

Do you have any recollection of crab trap pictures being posted by John's sister at BFN?
I was told that she did not. ..that the pictures she posted, provided to her by her brother, were of the Persistence in route from Aruba to the U.S.

TIA.

IIRC, there were NEVER any crap trap pictures posted by LegallyLex at BFN.

Robin posted them at BNH and someone took them and sent them to Klaas and RU.
I got accused of this, because I was logged in BNH for one minute  that day. I did not even see them until Klass posted them.




Oh yes, I remember all that very well. You being accused of it and all.

I'm just trying to clear up that John's sister did not post crab trap pictures at BFN, she posted pictues of the ship.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467513#msg467513


Thanks for the info, Pita.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:24:50 PM
We have always wondered why Urine was on a "watch list" and why the Sloot phones were being tapped.  Was this because the DEA was watching them because they had a connection to the drug post office?  Was Paulass also making money off of the drug transfers?  Is this why he went to the bank the same night as the drug transfer and what also turned out to be the same night that Natalee died?  Was he making some kind of a deposit of some cash that had been laundered through the casino where he had been that night?  Is this one of the reasons why Paulass was protected?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 12:32:14 PM
We have always wondered why Urine was on a "watch list" and why the Sloot phones were being tapped.  Was this because the DEA was watching them because they had a connection to the drug post office?  Was Paulass also making money off of the drug transfers?  Is this why he went to the bank the same night as the drug transfer and what also turned out to be the same night that Natalee died?  Was he making some kind of a deposit of some cash that had been laundered through the casino where he had been that night?  Is this one of the reasons why Paulass was protected?
Paulus may very well be involved in drug transfers. I highly doubt that this would have anything to do ATM withdrawls at 4am. If Paulus was being monitored by DEA -- any amount of money you could withdraw from an ATM account would be chicken feed. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 12:34:04 PM
Pita,

Do you have any recollection of crab trap pictures being posted by John's sister at BFN?
I was told that she did not. ..that the pictures she posted, provided to her by her brother, were of the Persistence in route from Aruba to the U.S.

TIA.

IIRC, there were NEVER any crap trap pictures posted by LegallyLex at BFN.

Robin posted them at BNH and someone took them and sent them to Klaas and RU.
I got accused of this, because I was logged in BNH for one minute  that day. I did not even see them until Klass posted them.




Oh yes, I remember all that very well. You being accused of it and all.

I'm just trying to clear up that John's sister did not post crab trap pictures at BFN, she posted pictues of the ship.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467513#msg467513


Thanks for the info, Pita.

I had this saved someone emailed it to me.

Robin
Active Admin

member is offline

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,386
Re: Breaking News
« Reply #14 on Today at 1:57pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a cage found about 6 weeks ago by the Persistence. This was on the Dateline show. It turned out not to be Natalee, but testing was done and DNA done just to be sure. It was not Natalee. I cannot express what we went through emotionally at that time, but we truly thought they had found her on the bottom of the ocean. I have no idea if it was human remains though. This is the first I have heard of that! I think that must be misinformation, but don't know for a fact. We only found out yesterday about the DNA results.

unless they are talking about something different than the cage that was found and the DNA tests done, Dave and I have no idea what is going on


Just maybe they were talking about a different cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 12:38:07 PM
I also remember some mention that the boat of the Gottenbos family was being repaired.  Would loading, carrying, and unloading any trap have damaged the interior or exterior?  

Did anyone ever look at that boat for evidence?  (I'm guessing no, it was never checked.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 12:40:59 PM
I saved this probably in the last month from one of the papers, sorry I don't know much more than that.  It may not be the one everyone's talking about and may not provide any more information than is already known.  Just thought someone might be interested.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/CarlosNicolaasCroes.jpg)


Thanks TM...I hope Finbar is lurking and can connect some dots with these Croes.

BTW...Did you open the Wedding link from page 1, that vms found...There is a Jorge Porras in the wedding party...Do you recall the discussion in Shango from the Dr. Phil Documents regarding that name?


Sorry so long responding, I'm trying to clean house and keep up.  Not easy, all the help quits if I turn my head for a minute!  I haven't looked at the wedding link yet, and I don't remember the discussion.  Yes, Finbar would be excellent to connect the dots!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:43:04 PM
We have always wondered why Urine was on a "watch list" and why the Sloot phones were being tapped.  Was this because the DEA was watching them because they had a connection to the drug post office?  Was Paulass also making money off of the drug transfers?  Is this why he went to the bank the same night as the drug transfer and what also turned out to be the same night that Natalee died?  Was he making some kind of a deposit of some cash that had been laundered through the casino where he had been that night?  Is this one of the reasons why Paulass was protected?
Paulus may very well be involved in drug transfers. I highly doubt that this would have anything to do ATM withdrawls at 4am. If Paulus was being monitored by DEA -- any amount of money you could withdraw from an ATM account would be chicken feed. JMO




Did he know that he was being watched and thst his phone was tapped at that point?

Was he making a deposit or a withdrawl?  The teller at the bank knew, but she died unexpectedly.   ::MonkeyShocked::  Have we ever seen the bank records?  By the time that Paulass went to the bank, that drug packages were probably on the way to Holland, so it might have been a deposit.  He had to justify a large sum of money for a deposit.  Is this why he played poker that night?  He could say it was his winnings.  Laundered money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 12:43:59 PM
I also remember some mention that the boat of the Gottenbos family was being repaired.  Would loading, carrying, and unloading any trap have damaged the interior or exterior?  

Did anyone ever look at that boat for evidence?  (I'm guessing no, it was never checked.)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/koenboat2-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 12:52:50 PM
I also remember some mention that the boat of the Gottenbos family was being repaired.  Would loading, carrying, and unloading any trap have damaged the interior or exterior?  

Did anyone ever look at that boat for evidence?  (I'm guessing no, it was never checked.)




Whiskey Girl - The boys might have put Natalee's body in the stolen fisherman's trap and taken her into the ocean using the Gottenbos boat.  If that did happen, it couldn't be the same trap that we are discussing that was found by Persistence.  The Persistence trap is too big and wouldn't fit on the Gottenbos boat.  The commercial trap is larger than the Gottenbos boat that is pictured in the Who's Who thread.  A crane was necessary to lift the trap that Persistence found.  Are the Gottenbos boys divers? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 22, 2008, 01:02:55 PM
I also remember some mention that the boat of the Gottenbos family was being repaired.  Would loading, carrying, and unloading any trap have damaged the interior or exterior?  

Did anyone ever look at that boat for evidence?  (I'm guessing no, it was never checked.)




Whiskey Girl - The boys might have put Natalee's body in the stolen fisherman's trap and taken her into the ocean using the Gottenbos boat.  If that did happen, it couldn't be the same trap that we are discussing that was found by Persistence.  The Persistence trap is too big and wouldn't fit on the Gottenbos boat.  The commercial trap is larger than the Gottenbos boat that is pictured in the Who's Who thread.  A crane was necessary to lift the trap that Persistence found.  Are the Gottenbos boys divers? 


Not sure...But I bet the Viana's are...Dad owned a dive company!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 01:04:56 PM
I also remember some mention that the boat of the Gottenbos family was being repaired.  Would loading, carrying, and unloading any trap have damaged the interior or exterior?  

Did anyone ever look at that boat for evidence?  (I'm guessing no, it was never checked.)




Whiskey Girl - The boys might have put Natalee's body in the stolen fisherman's trap and taken her into the ocean using the Gottenbos boat.  If that did happen, it couldn't be the same trap that we are discussing that was found by Persistence.  The Persistence trap is too big and wouldn't fit on the Gottenbos boat.  The commercial trap is larger than the Gottenbos boat that is pictured in the Who's Who thread.  A crane was necessary to lift the trap that Persistence found.  Are the Gottenbos boys divers? 


Not sure...But I bet the Viana's are...Dad owned a dive company!





 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 01:06:45 PM
Remember, Caps told us that the boys involved in the drug transfer were also involved with the Matty Apts. and the porn video scene.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 01:14:41 PM
Remember, Caps told us that the boys involved in the drug transfer were also involved with the Matty Apts. and the porn video scene.

Is any of that considered a crime in Aruba?  Prosecuted? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 01:21:08 PM
Mum,

From July '07. A lot heavier....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 01:23:02 PM
Shango said that the shivas left and Urine was with the Babylonians.

Caps said that the Alpoes left because they had some other things to attend to.

Three people were seen by the gardener.  If Urine was still at the Matty Apts. where Natalee was killed and he was disposiing of her, who was the third person in the car with the Alpoes?  Koen?  Freddy? Guido? Vianna? Lorenzo?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 22, 2008, 01:25:50 PM
Pita,

Do you have any recollection of crab trap pictures being posted by John's sister at BFN?
I was told that she did not. ..that the pictures she posted, provided to her by her brother, were of the Persistence in route from Aruba to the U.S.

TIA.

IIRC, there were NEVER any crap trap pictures posted by LegallyLex at BFN.

Robin posted them at BNH and someone took them and sent them to Klaas and RU.
I got accused of this, because I was logged in BNH for one minute  that day. I did not even see them until Klass posted them.




Oh yes, I remember all that very well. You being accused of it and all.

I'm just trying to clear up that John's sister did not post crab trap pictures at BFN, she posted pictues of the ship.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467513#msg467513


Thanks for the info, Pita.

You're welcome, vms.  I went back and checked Lex's posts at BFN to make sure my memory was correct.  It was.  She didn't post any crab trap pictures. 

And Blonde, I remember it happening that way as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 01:28:32 PM
Remember, Caps told us that the boys involved in the drug transfer were also involved with the Matty Apts. and the porn video scene.

Is any of that considered a crime in Aruba?  Prosecuted? 




We were told that a porn video was made that night of Natalee's rape.  It was reported that other American tourists on their last night in Aruba also met with this fate.  Fortunately, they didn't die.  As Urine put it in his statement .... we've done this twenty times before.  The porn videos were distributed through Florida.  It's all over in Shango.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 01:48:15 PM
Mum,

From July '07. A lot heavier....




Is the English name Charles a version of the name Carlos or Carl?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 01:59:22 PM
Mum,

From July '07. A lot heavier....




Is the English name Charles a version of the name Carlos or Carl?
I believe so (as in Carlos & Charlie's  ::MonkeyNoNo::)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 22, 2008, 02:08:35 PM
does anymonkey know if greta is having guests on Monday night?

TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 22, 2008, 02:16:59 PM
Hello FOM!

I haven't heard Greta say anything about guests but she has said she will show a video she has that she has been trying to share with Hans Mos.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 22, 2008, 02:25:51 PM
So Robin said there was nothing related to Natalee in the fish trap?  I saw that post when reading to catch up and now I can't find it.

In that case, there wouldn't be much to cover up in that regard.

I do think Greta has yet another confession from Joran to be ignored.  After all, everyone knows what a liar he is.

Can you imagine using that defense in a serious court of law about a serious crime like this?  No one can believe me because I lie so much.  Then having the judge go along with it.  Just unbelievable.  Even if he is lying, at some point, I think he should be held legally to his words and that is what would likely happen anywhere else in the world.

His confession would just be taken as fact and he would not be allowed to weasel out of it regardless.  If it is not true, he shouldn't be saying that it is.

imo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 02:33:20 PM
I saved this probably in the last month from one of the papers, sorry I don't know much more than that.  It may not be the one everyone's talking about and may not provide any more information than is already known.  Just thought someone might be interested.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/CarlosNicolaasCroes.jpg)


Thanks TM...I hope Finbar is lurking and can connect some dots with these Croes.

BTW...Did you open the Wedding link from page 1, that vms found...There is a Jorge Porras in the wedding party...Do you recall the discussion in Shango from the Dr. Phil Documents regarding that name?


Sorry so long responding, I'm trying to clean house and keep up.  Not easy, all the help quits if I turn my head for a minute!  I haven't looked at the wedding link yet, and I don't remember the discussion.  Yes, Finbar would be excellent to connect the dots!

I went back and typed it out so I could run it through the papiamentu translator, may have not been perfect typing btw but I think it was very close to exact.

This is what I got:

carlos nicolaas croes cu 90 ana of life much bendiciona we carlito, we dad we father always respeta, aprecia y love my acore go dress one dress cu much color cora because, mary owing to bisami cu they're of one family much alegra so my can t more serca din an curason cu my inspiracion formula poema here, owing to base din an same information they're hendenan cu likes laugh, happen pręt y happen good. expresa today at father god they gradicimento for din an humble curason. today they're celebra the of 90 cumpleanos din an father love carlito, father, dad, don carlos some nombernan of carino give at the caballero carlos nicolaas croes of sta. cruz, naci at aruba, his sweet lugar…pero…cu owing to emigra, take away his family at ana 1968 corsouw for go work y live together cu his estimada y beautiful wife henita y they 7 yuinan at edad much jong for today, look at bek on they recuerdonan “sweet and strong” in otrabanda or at punda, all the yuinan cu good comportacion learn stop on they same leg y follow they same curason einan they owing to live feliz for 35 anja cu de ves provided that cuando of vacacion akin owing to aruba yuinan already big y balente, cu is inspira another cu they same confidence y they form of give = mary, elda, edna, maria, dientjie, lucia y erwin= y after owing to give love y atencion also at steve cu owing to come = join owing to sweet y jolly family here as one yui y brother without bacila = recorda together so much time precioso of father god regala= cu his same confidence, father owing to inspira all yui for go catholic y resa= for so in end of week the yuinan can owing to leave dance at party much trip carlito gozando of sweet musica mariachi at corsouw after ten owing to mexico, apart from loves his lamanan blauw or hour the bring the macutonan ye of pisca y piskechi for wordo scama without mucho smak more of play domino, although the earn is saca cabes de ves provided that cuando y the is go back surprise his hendenan cu his good beis or cu one sweet chasco at anja 2003, past owing to come live bek at aruba his island natal y never forget y today the curason of yuinan y other family is reza one beautiful oracion special “pa father todopoderoso acepta the cruz din an father sue dad y the weight of his dianan in his misericordia, because is god owing to lagele arrive ten owing to the edad avansa here of 90. companjele now, hour his curpa do not obedece his self more y let do you gracia as his garoti y do you bendicion compel of his pianan…” let do you words is luz y love for his wowonan, senor” day 4 of november 1918 y 4 of november 2008 is fechanan historico in we family hour cu musica of mariachi will skeiro again in all angle of the curason complete of gladness hour cu yuinan, nietonan y bisanietonan will feel they self because; frutanan of one good simian or cu we dirigi we oracion cu firmeza y confidence, y give thanks for we father because; we guia for so much anja of life y goodness, y cu we is conforma cu locual god follow have for we y because; famil y prohimo brother, follow alaba father god cu simper owing to cuida we cu one pabien big y of curason, for we dad cu we loves, respeta y aprecia!! for we not have two father neither do don carlos neither two carlito for iguala!!! cu much love y carino, in number of all child grandson, grandson y other famil! autor: ruthy “lady ruth” vrieswijk-bergen-aruba-corsouw-aruba 4 november 2008 come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 22, 2008, 02:40:01 PM
Let's talk about little crab traps. Is this a good month for crabbing? I've forgotten. I recall you're not supposed to take ones with eggs on them. We used to cook 'em while they're still kicking because you don't want to go eating dead ones.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 02:49:45 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_49617.php

Court must stay in Curacao
21 Nov, 2008, 14:05 (GMT -04:00)

 
WILLEMSTAD – The seat of the future court of justice of the Kingdom countries in the Caribbean must stay in Curacao.  This is the position of the Island-territory of Curacao, confirmed Commissioner Zita Jesus-Leito (General Affairs, PAR) during the weekly press conference of the BC yesterday.

There is currently an impasse regarding the future seat of the Common Court of Justice for Curacao, Aruba, St. Maarten, and of Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and Saba.  In the concept-consensus statutory law Common Court of Justice that was handled in the Island Council on Friday morning is stated that the seat of the Court will be in Curacao.  Aruba is resisting this saying that she will not approve the consensus-statutory-law.  She is of the opinion that considering the fact that the Land Aruba is much longer in existence than the new countries in the Kingdom, Aruba must get that seat.

According to Jesus-Leito, Curacao insists that the seat of the Common Court of Justice for Curacao, Aruba, St. Maarten, and of Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and Saba remains in Curacao.  “Considering the fact that the current court is seated in Curacao for years already and that through the years we have built up the infrastructure and personnel, while also the Public Prosecutor is established here, we think that it is best for the Court to remain here in Curacao.  We firmly back this position”, says the commissioner, who doesn’t expect this to be a stop for the current political process.  “We do not consider this an issue.”



 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 22, 2008, 03:02:53 PM
83 year old Oscar Wyatt was let out of prison last year to a halfway house in, I think, Houston, on good behavior.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MuffyBee on November 22, 2008, 03:09:51 PM
83 year old Oscar Wyatt was let out of prison last year to a halfway house in, I think, Houston, on good behavior.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/W/WEBCAM_SUICIDE?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US
Texas oilman Wyatt finishes prison sentence at home
Associated Press - October 28, 2008 3:35 AM ET

HOUSTON (AP) - Lawyers for a Texas oil executive say he's finishing up his prison sentence at home, after being transferred from a halfway house.

An attorney says 84-year-old Oscar Wyatt Jr. began serving the final stint of his sentence at home last week.

Wyatt was sentenced to year and a day in prison for approving the payment of millions of dollars in kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's Iraq regime. Besides the prison sentence, he agreed to forfeit $11 million.

He pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to make illegal payments for Iraqi oil. In pleading guilty, he acknowledged he had orchestrated a $200,000 payment to Hussein's government.

Prison officials say Wyatt is due to be released Nov. 15 and they say his sentence has been trimmed because of good behavior.

Wyatt was transferred on Sept. 22 from a minimum-security federal prison to a halfway house in downtown Houston.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 03:31:20 PM
83 year old Oscar Wyatt was let out of prison last year to a halfway house in, I think, Houston, on good behavior.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/W/WEBCAM_SUICIDE?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US
Texas oilman Wyatt finishes prison sentence at home
Associated Press - October 28, 2008 3:35 AM ET

HOUSTON (AP) - Lawyers for a Texas oil executive say he's finishing up his prison sentence at home, after being transferred from a halfway house.

An attorney says 84-year-old Oscar Wyatt Jr. began serving the final stint of his sentence at home last week.

Wyatt was sentenced to year and a day in prison for approving the payment of millions of dollars in kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's Iraq regime. Besides the prison sentence, he agreed to forfeit $11 million.

He pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to make illegal payments for Iraqi oil. In pleading guilty, he acknowledged he had orchestrated a $200,000 payment to Hussein's government.

Prison officials say Wyatt is due to be released Nov. 15 and they say his sentence has been trimmed because of good behavior.

Wyatt was transferred on Sept. 22 from a minimum-security federal prison to a halfway house in downtown Houston.
I bet he makes a bee-line to the massage parlor.  ::MonkeyRoll::  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 03:37:45 PM
Ok, playlike this huge, heavy trap that had been in the ocean was used as a drop off for drugs, then the boys killed Nat, how in the hooty hell did they get her in the trap, how do they put drugs in the trap for a drop???? 
Natalee was NOT put in the trap by "the boys." She was put there by a "bigger boat" days/weeks later.

I will repost my theory from February '08 again:



Quote from: wreck on Today at 03:20:36 PM
I'm going to dig a bigger hole for myself as I think few are following what I'm saying.
1) The Persistence in all likelihood has found Natalee in the trap.
2) They really did not want to expose this just yet. Why? Because they still need to "prove"
the "whys" and "hows". They have a better chance of accomplishing this if the actual "perps"
aren't "clued in."
3) Why the "Dateline" irregularities? Because "Dateline" was already on board and they had to
 keep up "appearances" so they could continue with their "plan."
4) The posting of the pics on the internet put a severe cramp in their plans.
5) Why is trap so big? Because the body disposal did not happen that night as in Joran's story.
 Her body was put there at least a few days later by a bigger boat involving a larger cover-up.
This why they did not reveal their "finding" yet. They want to find out who has that bigger boat.

Once again -- my opinion.

We have waited 3 years -- hold on -- we're almost there!


~~~~~~ (Ocean Explorer:
I also pray that you are right!  Wreck, I like the way you think. 
Wreck, then what are your thoughts on Mos's press release about the FBI results?

Don't know - don't care what Mos says or does. I trusted him up until Thanksgiving time. Never again.

trainwreck .gif =  (http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/trainwreck.gif)

1. Yes.
2. Cover-up, corruption, securities fraud.


Thank you Kermit!   ::MonkeyCool::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/Dragonfly-01-june.gif) (http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/Dragonfly-01-june.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 03:49:35 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.780

Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -  on: March 18, 2008

Quote from: Magnolia on March 18, 2008, 02:13:08 PM
Quote
This was posted by gagal at RU back when the photo's first
were put up at BNH.  gagal was speaking for Robin.
Kyle already told us that the FBI sent the pictures to Dave & Robin.
Gagal was replying to Heli who questioned the motives of Robin.

Did the FBI give Dave and Robin the probability statistic?

I'm not about to attest to your intelligent level or anyone else's. WHAT I do know however is that theses photos were very upsetting to Robin and Dave.. you may see just a trap on the bottom of the floor, but what they saw was the possibility of a "99% probability" this was Natalee.




Response quote from oceanexploration March 18, 2008, 03:04:38 PM

Quote
The "99.9%" came independantly from Tim Miller to Dave H. on Dec 29th, prior to the diver visual inspection of the trap.   I can't imagine what that must have felt like to be told and then completely retracted the next day.  I couldn't believe the information was prematurely leaked to the family before we knew what we were looking at.  My heart broke for Dave and Beth.

Personally, I fed off of Tim's inflated confidence and my own on the night of Dec 29th.  I did not sleep. Few of us did. The only person able to remain completely objective, much to his credit, was John Silvetti.  In hindsight, I am in awe of him for his wisdom(from past hard experiences) and strength. At the time, I thought he was nuts for not siding with the rest of us after the first dive. It was a crushing dissapointment the evening of Dec 30th, but not over.  The tactile inspection dive was coming. Dec 30th, 2007 will forever stand in my mind as one of the hardest single days of my life.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 03:55:07 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.780

Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -  on: March 18, 2008

Quote from: Magnolia on March 18, 2008, 02:13:08 PM
Quote
This was posted by gagal at RU back when the photo's first
were put up at BNH.  gagal was speaking for Robin.
Kyle already told us that the FBI sent the pictures to Dave & Robin.
Gagal was replying to Heli who questioned the motives of Robin.

Did the FBI give Dave and Robin the probability statistic?

I'm not about to attest to your intelligent level or anyone else's. WHAT I do know however is that theses photos were very upsetting to Robin and Dave.. you may see just a trap on the bottom of the floor, but what they saw was the possibility of a "99% probability" this was Natalee.




Response quote from oceanexploration March 18, 2008, 03:04:38 PM

Quote
The "99.9%" came independantly from Tim Miller to Dave H. on Dec 29th, prior to the diver visual inspection of the trap.   I can't imagine what that must have felt like to be told and then completely retracted the next day.  I couldn't believe the information was prematurely leaked to the family before we knew what we were looking at.  My heart broke for Dave and Beth.

Personally, I fed off of Tim's inflated confidence and my own on the night of Dec 29th.  I did not sleep. Few of us did. The only person able to remain completely objective, much to his credit, was John Silvetti.  In hindsight, I am in awe of him for his wisdom(from past hard experiences) and strength. At the time, I thought he was nuts for not siding with the rest of us after the first dive. It was a crushing dissapointment the evening of Dec 30th, but not over.  The tactile inspection dive was coming. Dec 30th, 2007 will forever stand in my mind as one of the hardest single days of my life.

Wow! Kind of makes you go "hmmmmmm" after Kermit's revelations.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 04:05:59 PM
Hope4N Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 3:36 pm

I am going to respond here and know everything I say gets torn to shreds and misinterpreted. If Natalee is in the water and anything is findable, we are grateful these volunteers are going to at least try. Why rip into this person who tried to provide this forum updates and is actually trying to go to find Natalee and bring her home. So go ahead, tear into me like most of you always do. All we want is Natalee.

Robin


From same thread at RU the trap


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 22, 2008, 04:13:20 PM
Guess I'm a little confused...I do remember Christmas Eve, in discussion...then this:

In hindsight, I am in awe of him for his wisdom(from past hard experiences) and strength. At the time, I thought he was nuts for not siding with the rest of us after the first dive. It was a crushing dissapointment the evening of Dec 30th, but not over.


So, when exactly was the first dive?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 04:16:23 PM
Guess I'm a little confused...I do remember Christmas Eve, in discussion...then this:

In hindsight, I am in awe of him for his wisdom(from past hard experiences) and strength. At the time, I thought he was nuts for not siding with the rest of us after the first dive. It was a crushing dissapointment the evening of Dec 30th, but not over.


So, when exactly was the first dive?
I'm puzzled too - unless by the word "dive" he meant the dive of the "ROV" that took the pictures.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 04:18:58 PM
Guess I'm a little confused...I do remember Christmas Eve, in discussion...then this:

In hindsight, I am in awe of him for his wisdom(from past hard experiences) and strength. At the time, I thought he was nuts for not siding with the rest of us after the first dive. It was a crushing dissapointment the evening of Dec 30th, but not over.


So, when exactly was the first dive?
I'm puzzled too - unless by the word "dive" he meant the dive of the "ROV" that took the pictures.

That's what I'm thinking too, the first "dive" was the ROV only...maybe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 22, 2008, 04:23:27 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 04:24:18 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Snip:
And Dateline was there when the Persistence was ready to sail.

Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.

Chris Hansen: So, you're thinking-- you're thinking at this point--

Tim Miller: I’m thinking at this point, "Oh, my God, maybe we've got something. Maybe we've got something."

Could they have found her? Or was hope, perhaps, making them see what they wanted to see?

(on the boat)

Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.

Tim Miller couldn't help but think that the date they first saw that trap -- Christmas eve was a sign that just maybe they were on to something.

(on the boat)

Tim Miller: Maybe that was some of God's timing. I hope maybe Beth and Dave can have what they have been looking for two and half years.

Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

Chris Hansen: Did you think that was it?

Dave Holloway: I did.

And the Holloways weren't alone. The next day Aruban authorities, including chief prosecutor Hans Mos, came on board to see for themselves.

Tim Miller: We showed them what we had. I think they got real interested, too. We all thought we had something.

The Aruban authorities agreed the find looked promising. And finally, divers from the Persistence and the Aruban police set out to get an up-close look.

Tim Miller: Everything was going right. That morning there was actually a double rainbow when we got started.

Chris Hansen: A double rainbow. Not just one rainbow.

Another sign from above?

A school of dolphins followed the Persistence as it sailed out to the target.

Tim Miller: I know I looked at somebody on the boat, and I said, "The-- the dolphins are going with us to go ahead and get Natalee."
 
(On the boat)

Tim Miller: We are at the spot. Ready to go down . .it is now only a matter of minutes before we know.

snip



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 22, 2008, 04:24:29 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Sorry.

    Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

    Chris Hansen: Did you think that was it?

    Dave Holloway: I did.

And the Holloways weren't alone. The next day Aruban authorities, including chief prosecutor Hans Mos, came on board to see for themselves.

    Tim Miller: We showed them what we had. I think they got real interested, too. We all thought we had something.

The Aruban authorities agreed the find looked promising. And finally, divers from the Persistence and the Aruban police set out to get an up-close look.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 04:28:01 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Sorry.

    Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

    Chris Hansen: Did you think that was it?

    Dave Holloway: I did.

And the Holloways weren't alone. The next day Aruban authorities, including chief prosecutor Hans Mos, came on board to see for themselves.

    Tim Miller: We showed them what we had. I think they got real interested, too. We all thought we had something.

The Aruban authorities agreed the find looked promising. And finally, divers from the Persistence and the Aruban police set out to get an up-close look.
I'm getting more angry!!  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 04:30:53 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Sorry.

    Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

    Chris Hansen: Did you think that was it?

    Dave Holloway: I did.

And the Holloways weren't alone. The next day Aruban authorities, including chief prosecutor Hans Mos, came on board to see for themselves.

    Tim Miller: We showed them what we had. I think they got real interested, too. We all thought we had something.

The Aruban authorities agreed the find looked promising. And finally, divers from the Persistence and the Aruban police set out to get an up-close look.
I'm getting more angry!!  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Me too Wreck!  Angry...and sad, for Natalee. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 22, 2008, 04:35:56 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 22, 2008, 04:37:05 PM
Let's talk about little crab traps. Is this a good month for crabbing? I've forgotten. I recall you're not supposed to take ones with eggs on them. We used to cook 'em while they're still kicking because you don't want to go eating dead ones.

I read this earlier and found that June is a good crabbing month in the Caribbean... one article I found was specifically talking about Cayman, but mentioned other islands..excluding the Antilles but I would imagine it's the same, and another was a tripadvisor review for a Mexican resort also dated June...... fwiw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 22, 2008, 04:37:11 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 05:08:31 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

I may be wrong, but I think the "sonar" sighting of the trap was the 24th, first ROV dive "visuals" on the 29th (phone call to Dave); Mos and the rest on board 30th.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 05:36:10 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Snip:
And Dateline was there when the Persistence was ready to sail.

Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/sea1.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/sea2.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/sea3.jpg)


Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/cage.jpg)
Chris Hansen: So, you're thinking-- you're thinking at this point--

Tim Miller: I’m thinking at this point, "Oh, my God, maybe we've got something. Maybe we've got something."

Could they have found her? Or was hope, perhaps, making them see what they wanted to see?

(on the boat)

Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.

Tim Miller couldn't help but think that the date they first saw that trap -- Christmas eve was a sign that just maybe they were on to something.

(on the boat)

Tim Miller: Maybe that was some of God's timing. I hope maybe Beth and Dave can have what they have been looking for two and half years.

Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

Chris Hansen: Did you think that was it?

Dave Holloway: I did.

And the Holloways weren't alone. The next day Aruban authorities, including chief prosecutor Hans Mos, came on board to see for themselves.

Tim Miller: We showed them what we had. I think they got real interested, too. We all thought we had something.

The Aruban authorities agreed the find looked promising. And finally, divers from the Persistence and the Aruban police set out to get an up-close look.

Tim Miller: Everything was going right. That morning there was actually a double rainbow when we got started.

Chris Hansen: A double rainbow. Not just one rainbow.

Another sign from above?

A school of dolphins followed the Persistence as it sailed out to the target.

Tim Miller: I know I looked at somebody on the boat, and I said, "The-- the dolphins are going with us to go ahead and get Natalee."
 
(On the boat)

Tim Miller: We are at the spot. Ready to go down . .it is now only a matter of minutes before we know.

snip




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 06:08:11 PM
Thanks Blonde!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 06:08:30 PM
Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

Casa, I do not know John Silvetti.  He may be a saint.  I am not ashamed of looking for clues to solve this case.  I do apologize if I have offended, because posting negative comments about anyone on the internet is offensive.  I think we are grasping at any clues or information that we can to try to find the answers we need.  I did research Silvetti and Schaefer.  I will say that my suspicions lean more toward Schaefer.  He does have connections in the NL that make me go hmmm. 

If you can, please answer this question, did Silvetti attend a Mansur wedding?  Does he have a connection to Jossy?    IIRC, Caps was talking about Silvetti as related to the pond search.  He said that he had spoke with John regarding when the search would be performed.  Now, I don't know who CAPS is but how does he know John Silvetti?  It appears that John had connections to Aruba prior to Natalee's search.

Agan, I am not trying to upset you.  Please do not take offense.

CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.  About Jossy, i know nothing about that.  I was the one who told CAPS to go to the ship and wait for John.  And I do know who CAPS is.  This boat that may have taken the trap away, if anything was the Gottenbos boat.  I too feel that they have what they needed to bring home, and thats why we hear nothing.   

What do "they" have???

It's what some of us think was found in the cage and hidden and brought back to the FBI. It's still never been confirmed and Kyle will not comment.

The hidden part is what's confusing me???At what point would they have been able to conceal what "They" had and get it back to the FBI??

Maybe a secret dive, when no one else was there. This way the important ones couldn't be blamed.

Just a stupid question:

Why would Arubans wait until international scrutiny was placed on their island with a search to hide/switch body from a trap?

Why not do it between June 2005 and Dec 2007?

I would think a cleaning crew would have went to work on crime scenes in the event that FBI gained any type of jurisdiction...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 06:13:05 PM
Ok, I will throw something else out there then I will go smoke some crack and go to sleep.  They probably do have boats like that that go to Venezula for drug traffic, what if Paulus knew of an upcoming shipment, and that is why he went to the ATM twice to get money for his "package". 
I don't know why I keep arguing with you - I'm sorry, but that is not how drug trafficking works. Drug deals of a large proportion don't occur with money exchanging hands at the drop off or with amounts that can be withdrawn from an ATM. Paulus went to the ATM THAT Sunday night -- Natalee was not in the big fish cage at that time.

I know this has been discussed, but...
The quantity of money needed for a major drug deal, in my opinion, could not be obtained from one, nor two, ATM withdrawls. I could be wrong, though. More likely scenario would be advanced payment for someone doing an after hours job until the remainder of money could be obtained (in the next day or two).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 06:16:00 PM
Was Mackin McKinney - Natalee’s Aruba Roommate  ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 06:16:50 PM
Another thought....  If I were a sociopath who killed someone, I would want to make certain that I got away with the murder.  If I put the body in a fish cage in the ocean, someone like Persistence could come along and find it.  If I buried the body on land, I could keep an eye on it and be reassured that my secret was safe.

Whether right or wrong, I have always felt that an ocean disposal would eventually allow for the possibility of discovery whereas a land disposal (coffin, grave, or incinerator) would provide for a much better secret and safekeeping/monitoring of that secret.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 06:21:32 PM
Was Mackin McKinney - Natalee’s Aruba Roommate  ?
Sunday, April 6, 2008

Natalee Holloway

We had just had celebrated our big high school graduation and were scheduled to go to Aruba the next morning. There were one hundred and twenty five of our best friends going down to celebrate after finally graduating from Mountain Brook High School. A group of us had spent the night at my house the so that we could get up early and all head to the airport together. We talked about all the fun things we wanted to do and how excited we all were, as we were all completely oblivious to what was about to happen. I never would have guessed that this would be the last time that Natalee would be in my house with all of us.

Our flight was scheduled to leave at seven in the morning so we had to get up very early. None of us really had slept the night before because we were all too excited. We finally arrived in Aruba and were greeted by buses that were going to take us to our resort. It was an all inclusive hotel that had tons of places to eat and bars on the property. We had to decide who was going to be in our rooms before we arrived and there was a door that opened to the next room to combine them. Natalee and I shared a room with two other girls along with four more of our friends in the next room. Everyone was so excited that we immediately put on our bathing suits and headed to the pool. The first night everyone decided to stay at the hotel and just go to the bars and the casinos. We were having a ball and everyone was so laid back and care free.

As our trip was coming to a close on our last night everyone decided that we were going to ride the bus into town and go to the hot spot Carlos and Charlies. We were scheduled to go out on a day cruise on a sailboat for the day and then were going to go home and eat dinner before we headed out for our big night on the town. The sailboat was amazing and there was a bar on the boat so all of us were laying out on the front of the boat getting sun and enjoying our tropical drinks. Natalee and all of us began to talk about these guys that we had met in the casino the night before and how they had said that they were going to go to Carlos and Charlies also. None of us really had wanted to be around them, but they had come to our hotel and started conversation with all of us.

We got in from the day out on the water and ran to our rooms to shower and get ready for dinner and a crazy last night in Aruba. After enjoying a nice dinner at the hotel, all of us loaded up onto the buses and headed into town. The bar was so crowded and everyone began drinking and dancing. The bar tenders were getting people on stage to compete in contest and of course all of our friends were on stage. It began getting late and the bar was closing so all of us were forced outside into the street. Most of the group was together, but none of us could find Natalee. The bar was so crazy when everyone was leaving that there was no trying to find someone cause everyone was pushing and shoving and of course had lots to drink. Everyone began cramming into cabs and headed back to the hotel. There was another group that had gone to another bar so most of us figured Natalee had gone with them. Everyone was exhausted and ready to go to bed so when we got back to the hotel we fell right to sleep.

We woke up the next morning to find that Natalee was not in our room and figured that she had just stayed in another room. Natalee was never the type to be late and would never miss something like a flight home. It was getting close to the time we were supposed to leave for the airport and there was still no sign of Natalee. Me and some of my friends began to cry and started to seriously worry about Natalee. One of our teachers that was on the trip stayed behind and called Natalee's parents and told them to head down to Aruba immediately that Natalee didn't return home from the bar the night before. All of us were freaking out and didn't know what to do. We had tried to stay behind with our teacher but they wouldn't let us.

The night we got home everyone came over to my house to spend the night and we had heard that there was to be an announcement on the news stating that Natalee Holloway was missing on a graduation trip and hadn't returned home from Aruba. All of us were in shock and had a really hard time dealing with everything that was going on. We didn't know what to do and had no clue that our lives were about to change. One of our best friends had gone missing and we didn't know if she was dead or alive.

Mackin McKinney Blog (Natalee's Friend

http://mackinmckinney.blogspot.com/2008/04/natalee-holloway.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 22, 2008, 06:24:27 PM
Shango said that the shivas left and Urine was with the Babylonians.

Caps said that the Alpoes left because they had some other things to attend to.

Three people were seen by the gardener.  If Urine was still at the Matty Apts. where Natalee was killed and he was disposiing of her, who was the third person in the car with the Alpoes?  Koen?  Freddy? Guido? Vianna? Lorenzo?

Koen could look like Joran at night time.
Koen hid behind the couch when Dave peeked into their house window.
Rumor was Koen slept w/his parents.
Sander said he lost his phone that 'day' at school.
Sander said he'd put his 'hand in the fire' for Joran.

We know the boys were playing games with the cell phones that night. Hey Swa, yada yada... they were texting while riding in different cars that night.

I'll bet there is a different timeline, from leaving C&C, to Deepak taking a piss, to the fisherman seeing Kalpoe car by the Marriott, to the witness seeing the boys by the racquet club, to the witness seeing Joran walking w/one sneaker, and Paulus driving down the road.

And what about the next day - Sander said he 'invited Joran on his boat', and (was it Koen?) who was said to be playing tennis the next day w/Joran but they didn't play, so what were they doing? Whatever they were doing, they were done to show up on security cams at the ca$inos.

All the boys that fled Aruba. Guido Wever, GvCromvort, Gottenbos.

They were all in on the after events (IMO).

Every one of 'em.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2008, 06:38:01 PM
Kyle said that there were human remains in the fish trap.
That to me means a skull as well as other bones.  The skull is
the only human bone that I would recognize.
If Natalee was assaulted, I don't think she would have still
been in her clothing that she wore at C&C.
I wouldn't have told Robin a thing about what the testing
found after her fiasco with the pictures.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 06:39:50 PM
Was Mackin McKinney - Natalee’s Aruba Roommate  ?
Sunday, April 6, 2008

Natalee Holloway

We had just had celebrated our big high school graduation and were scheduled to go to Aruba the next morning. There were one hundred and twenty five of our best friends going down to celebrate after finally graduating from Mountain Brook High School. A group of us had spent the night at my house the so that we could get up early and all head to the airport together. We talked about all the fun things we wanted to do and how excited we all were, as we were all completely oblivious to what was about to happen. I never would have guessed that this would be the last time that Natalee would be in my house with all of us.

Our flight was scheduled to leave at seven in the morning so we had to get up very early. None of us really had slept the night before because we were all too excited. We finally arrived in Aruba and were greeted by buses that were going to take us to our resort. It was an all inclusive hotel that had tons of places to eat and bars on the property. We had to decide who was going to be in our rooms before we arrived and there was a door that opened to the next room to combine them. Natalee and I shared a room with two other girls along with four more of our friends in the next room. Everyone was so excited that we immediately put on our bathing suits and headed to the pool. The first night everyone decided to stay at the hotel and just go to the bars and the casinos. We were having a ball and everyone was so laid back and care free.

As our trip was coming to a close on our last night everyone decided that we were going to ride the bus into town and go to the hot spot Carlos and Charlies. We were scheduled to go out on a day cruise on a sailboat for the day and then were going to go home and eat dinner before we headed out for our big night on the town. The sailboat was amazing and there was a bar on the boat so all of us were laying out on the front of the boat getting sun and enjoying our tropical drinks. Natalee and all of us began to talk about these guys that we had met in the casino the night before and how they had said that they were going to go to Carlos and Charlies also. None of us really had wanted to be around them, but they had come to our hotel and started conversation with all of us.

We got in from the day out on the water and ran to our rooms to shower and get ready for dinner and a crazy last night in Aruba. After enjoying a nice dinner at the hotel, all of us loaded up onto the buses and headed into town. The bar was so crowded and everyone began drinking and dancing. The bar tenders were getting people on stage to compete in contest and of course all of our friends were on stage. It began getting late and the bar was closing so all of us were forced outside into the street. Most of the group was together, but none of us could find Natalee. The bar was so crazy when everyone was leaving that there was no trying to find someone cause everyone was pushing and shoving and of course had lots to drink. Everyone began cramming into cabs and headed back to the hotel. There was another group that had gone to another bar so most of us figured Natalee had gone with them. Everyone was exhausted and ready to go to bed so when we got back to the hotel we fell right to sleep.

We woke up the next morning to find that Natalee was not in our room and figured that she had just stayed in another room. Natalee was never the type to be late and would never miss something like a flight home. It was getting close to the time we were supposed to leave for the airport and there was still no sign of Natalee. Me and some of my friends began to cry and started to seriously worry about Natalee. One of our teachers that was on the trip stayed behind and called Natalee's parents and told them to head down to Aruba immediately that Natalee didn't return home from the bar the night before. All of us were freaking out and didn't know what to do. We had tried to stay behind with our teacher but they wouldn't let us.

The night we got home everyone came over to my house to spend the night and we had heard that there was to be an announcement on the news stating that Natalee Holloway was missing on a graduation trip and hadn't returned home from Aruba. All of us were in shock and had a really hard time dealing with everything that was going on. We didn't know what to do and had no clue that our lives were about to change. One of our best friends had gone missing and we didn't know if she was dead or alive.

Mackin McKinney Blog (Natalee's Friend

http://mackinmckinney.blogspot.com/2008/04/natalee-holloway.html



thanks Blonde > i know that blog and this letter  is the dutch tread here  ::MonkeyWink::

For me is this important :  None of us really had wanted to be around them, but they had come to our hotel and started conversation with all of us .

And she said they had come to our hotel  > was that outside the hotel ,at the bar, were they hanging around a bit  ?
Was that the only time "they" were there ?
And who are "they"?
And she said :None of us really had wanted to be around them> why was that ? there must be a reason to say that .




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 22, 2008, 07:17:57 PM
WHAT did Koen and Guido do? Sander? Val?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 07:18:52 PM
It looks like there are two new witnesses in addition to Celes and the witness near the pond.
******************

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/18/grace.coldcase.holloway/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail
By Rupa Mikkilineni
Nancy Grace Producer
CNN
     
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Authorities in Aruba say they're looking into new evidence that could lead to an arrest 3˝ years after Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared on a senior class trip to the island.

 
Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared while on vacation in Aruba with classmates in 2005.

 1 of 2  Aruban police are investigating two new tips they hope will provide the corroborating evidence they need to make an arrest, lead prosecutor Hans Mos told CNN.

He would not discuss details but said police again consider Dutch student Joran van der Sloot to be the prime suspect in Holloway's disappearance.

A new witness has emerged, authorities say, who can place van der Sloot and his father, Paulus van der Sloot, near a pond on the island at 4 a.m. on the day Holloway vanished.

The witness told authorities he saw a young man, wet from the chest down and wearing only one shoe, running along a road from the pond to a fast-food restaurant.

The witness said he saw the young man and an older man driving slowly down the road in a red Jeep about 10 minutes later. The pond was not among those searched in the early stages of the investigation, Mos said.

A second witness, a former girlfriend of Joran van der Sloot, also told police he made suspicious-sounding comments while they were on the beach. The witness, publicly known only as Celes, told police van der Sloot said: "Who knows? You may now be on the beach with someone who is able to get rid of a corpse."  Watch the latest developments in the case »

In addition, Mos said, two other witnesses have come forward. He declined to discuss those witnesses, other than to say he is hopeful the case can be solved.

"We are hoping to make a decision by the end of this year or early next year as to whether we will re-arrest [the younger] van der Sloot or not," Mos told CNN.

Also key to the investigation, Mos added, is a Dutch journalist Peter De Vries' videotaped interview with van der Sloot. In the interview, van der Sloot acknowledges a friend helped him get rid of her body. Read how van der Sloot "lost no sleep" over Holloway

Mos said he is confident that the tape, which he characterizes as a confession, is admissible in court. With the new tips and new witnesses whose testimony impeaches earlier statements by van der Sloot and his father, Mos said he might have enough evidence to solve the mystery of what happened to Holloway.

The elder van der Sloot has told police he was at home, asleep in bed until 7 a.m. on the night in question. And, Joran van der Sloot has never been able to explain what happened to his tennis shoes, Mos said.

Holloway's father, Dave, said the new developments caught him by surprise.

"Well, I really hope it's true, because they even have Joran on tape confessing, and I don't know what could be better than that," he said.

Van der Sloot's family and attorney did not return phone calls.

Natalee Holloway, 19, a senior at Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama, was a vibrant member of the school band's dance team, "The Dorians," which is similar to the "Rockettes." She was a straight-A student who planned to study pre-medicine at the University of Alabama.

Don't Miss
Nancy Grace's Cold Cases
CNN.com Crime page
Nancy Grace show page
She vanished in May 2005 while on her senior class trip to the island. She was last seen at the popular night club Carlos 'n Charlie's early on the morning her class was due to fly home.

Her disappearance became the subject of a high-profile search and a massive media frenzy. Holloway family members and friends organized volunteer search efforts in Aruba that went on for months.

Early missteps cost investigators valuable time and evidence. Police at first mistakenly arrested two men who had nothing to do with Holloway's disappearance. And, investigators initially ignored information from witnesses pointing to the three young men last seen with Holloway that night.

When Joran van der Sloot and brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe were arrested, they told conflicting stories. By that time, verifiable facts were hard to come by.

Van der Sloot is a member of a prominent Dutch family in Aruba. At the time of Holloway's disappearance, his father was a judge in training. Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe were arrested and let go twice in connection with Holloway's disappearance.

While they were in jail, police and prosecutors sought corroborating evidence to piece together a motive and theory. They were not successful. Late last year, authorities closed the case without bringing any charges.

"We simply did not yet have the corroborating evidence to take this to trial and win a conviction," prosecutor Mos told CNN. "If we had a body even to determine cause of death, then we could piece some thing together."

In February, the videotape of van der Sloot's taped admission surfaced on Dutch television. De Vries, a famed Dutch journalist, set up a hidden camera capturing van der Sloot talking about Holloway's last moments and how her body was disposed of "like an old rag."

Since then, De Vries has set up another on-camera sting. It aired last week, showing van der Sloot meeting with undercover reporters who posed as Dutch sex industry bosses looking for Thai prostitutes to recruit to the Netherlands as sex slaves.

In the tape, van der Sloot allegedly promises to supply Thai girls for prostitution in Holland and accepts 1,000 Euros as advance payment for his services.


Apparently van der Sloot left the Netherlands late last year and has been living in Thailand for the last few months as a student.

His whereabouts right now are unknown, but Aruban authorities are grateful for the tips that the Dutch documentaries have generated. They hope the tips will bring them closer to a resolution in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 07:20:32 PM
oeps
I found this on an Aruban forum
 22 June 2005

Trust me they are involved and guilty!  

they dumped her in the  mondi .. and following day in pieces of the rocks

i googled it and the mondi is a  cemetery

Cemetery of Sabana Basora in Aruba

(http://www.volkskrant.nl/multimedia/archive/00123/Percy_123406p.jpg)

what told caps us ?  



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 22, 2008, 07:25:21 PM
On June 22 2005.. Very interesting indeed.
Could very well be..
Where are these rocks ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 07:30:14 PM
Does anyone understand what Jossy is trying to say?
*********

MANSUR: Most of us believe that what Joran said on the first program of De Vries is correct, that she died in his arms but not from seizure -- we don't know how she died -- that [he] called a friend and the friend dumped her in the ocean. That's what most people believe.  No Jossy, that's not what most people think.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is there any suggestion that there was a boat there that night or any ability to dump her into the ocean?

MANSUR: Well, probably because there were some boats nearby, and especially the boat (INAUDIBLE) the tour (ph) ship, which is a tourist ship. There must have been other boats in the vicinity, as Joran would not have invented this with De Vries.  Jossy, are you serious???

VAN SUSTEREN: In terms of boats, just so that we have some sort of idea of the geography, for people who need to be reminded, how far, for instance, is Aruba from Venezuela?

MANSUR: Fifteen nautical miles is the nearest point within Aruba and Venezuela.

VAN SUSTEREN: And do you know -- and in terms of boats that night, do you know if any thorough investigation, one that you would have confidence in? Has that been done?

MANSUR: No, it hasn't been done because that night, somebody in the police force told the people handling the radar that controls the boats in the vicinity on the coast of Aruba -- told them to put it off.  Yup, the bird was on the wire because a drug deal was going down.

VAN SUSTEREN: Jossy, thank you.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,454527,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 07:38:29 PM
The rocks were disturbing to say the least & then the explanation of it being the body of a 7 yr old boy who had never been reported as missing & that explanation as plausible to Jossey Mansur sent up huge red flags to me that something was really amiss as to who was playing who, imo.

Johan, nice find.  Thanks for bringing it forward.  Hope CLW comments on, maybe he/she will find it helpful too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 07:40:23 PM
By Jen Hale
Reporter and weekend anchor
Published: November 19, 2008

There’s now word of a new witness in the case of missing Mountain Brook teen Natalee Holloway.

The Aruban Prosecutor’s Office says this new witness claims Joran van der Sloot confessed to her that he did indeed dump Natalee’s body into the ocean.

Natalee’s mom Beth Holloway says she believes this new witness is a girl NBC 13 introduced you to last week.

A woman named Celeste who first told her story to Dutch crime reporter Peter de Vries.

Celeste is Joran van der Sloot’s ex girlfriend. She says van der Sloot told her he knew how to dispose of bodies in the ocean so they’d never be found and that van der Sloot admitted his dad Paul coached him on what to say throughout this investigation.

Right now, the Aruban prosecutor’s office is not identifying their new witness: except to say the new witness is female and that she says van der Sloot admitted to her that he dumped Natalee’s body in the ocean.  

Lead prosecutor Hans Mos says this new witness’s testimony is not enough by itself to charge van der Sloot with Natalee’s murder.

“After three years of investigating, it is very very difficult to find that evidence. We have to be realistic,” says Mos. 

As for Beth Holloway -she says for now - she’s sitting by quietly - waiting to see how these developments unfold. 
http://www.nbc13.com/vtm/news/local/article/a_possible_new_witness_in_the_natalee_holloway_case/47534/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 07:43:49 PM
oeps
I found this on an Aruban forum
 22 June 2005

Trust me they are involved and guilty!  

they dumped her in the  mondi .. and following day in pieces of the rocks

i googled it and the mondi is a  cemetery

Cemetery of Sabana Basora in Aruba

(http://www.volkskrant.nl/multimedia/archive/00123/Percy_123406p.jpg)

what told caps us ?  



Cemetery of Sabana Basora is not far from Lorenzo's house !

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/cap1.jpg)

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/cap2.jpg)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 07:44:15 PM
The rocks were disturbing to say the least & then the explanation of it being the body of a 7 yr old boy who had never been reported as missing & that explanation as plausible to Jossey Mansur sent up huge red flags to me that something was really amiss as to who was playing who, imo.

Johan, nice find.  Thanks for bringing it forward.  Hope CLW comments on, maybe he/she will find it helpful too!




Caps has been silent about the cemetery since about September.  He was certain that Natalee (or part of Natalee) is in the Masonic Cemetery.  He has been saying that for almost a year now.  I wonder if the piece of evidence Greta has which requires a subpoena would be connected to the cemetery.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: lowsw on November 22, 2008, 07:49:27 PM
Michelle Simonsen who blogs at the "Boycott Aruba -- Justice For Natalee" blog will be on the Levi Page Show (internet radio) to discuss the latest in the Holloway case.

Sunday, November 23, 2008
Show Begins 10:00 PM EST
(Michelle will be on the 2nd segment at 10:30 pm EST)

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/HeadingRight/LeviPage (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/HeadingRight/LeviPage)
Call-in Number: (347) 838-9781


Topics to be discussed:
- Prosecutor Hans Mos, and his refusal to meet with Greta
- The investigation into the new witnesses (the former girlfriend of Joran, and the man that placed him and his father, at a pond)
- The recent allegations that Joran is involved in a Thai sex ring.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 07:52:36 PM
Does anyone understand what Jossy is trying to say?
*********

MANSUR: Most of us believe that what Joran said on the first program of De Vries is correct, that she died in his arms but not from seizure -- we don't know how she died -- that [he] called a friend and the friend dumped her in the ocean. That's what most people believe.  No Jossy, that's not what most people think.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is there any suggestion that there was a boat there that night or any ability to dump her into the ocean?

MANSUR: Well, probably because there were some boats nearby, and especially the boat (INAUDIBLE) the tour (ph) ship, which is a tourist ship. There must have been other boats in the vicinity, as Joran would not have invented this with De Vries.  Jossy, are you serious???

VAN SUSTEREN: In terms of boats, just so that we have some sort of idea of the geography, for people who need to be reminded, how far, for instance, is Aruba from Venezuela?

MANSUR: Fifteen nautical miles is the nearest point within Aruba and Venezuela.

VAN SUSTEREN: And do you know -- and in terms of boats that night, do you know if any thorough investigation, one that you would have confidence in? Has that been done?

MANSUR: No, it hasn't been done because that night, somebody in the police force told the people handling the radar that controls the boats in the vicinity on the coast of Aruba -- told them to put it off.  Yup, the bird was on the wire because a drug deal was going down.

VAN SUSTEREN: Jossy, thank you.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,454527,00.html

Jossey Mansur is not like any newspaper Editor that I have ever met & known, he speaks in circles, mumbles the inaudible when it is convenient, makes promises that he does not keep, "somebody" how about delivering up some credibility with some documentation as to the identity of the "somebody".  He's has displayed himself to be a rumor mongerer & the USA MSM still brings him to the table, I JUST DON'T GET IT.  Yet another self promoter, let's face it a real journalistic Editor has reporter's that produce credible news worthy stories, the Editor is the support to his journalists.  There has been something wrong with this picture for quite some time, imo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 07:56:28 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Secret Dive??One would think in terms of time and resources that they would not have waited for six days to learn the contents of that trap!JMO.Who chose when to dive or not to dive??OE??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 22, 2008, 08:05:59 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIfA90i6YBo

Sorry if this was already posted.

Don't forget to watch Greta on Monday!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 08:06:05 PM
It looks like there are two new witnesses in addition to Celes and the witness near the pond.
******************

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/18/grace.coldcase.holloway/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail
By Rupa Mikkilineni
Nancy Grace Producer
CNN
     
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Authorities in Aruba say they're looking into new evidence that could lead to an arrest 3˝ years after Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared on a senior class trip to the island.

 
Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared while on vacation in Aruba with classmates in 2005.

 1 of 2  Aruban police are investigating two new tips they hope will provide the corroborating evidence they need to make an arrest, lead prosecutor Hans Mos told CNN.

He would not discuss details but said police again consider Dutch student Joran van der Sloot to be the prime suspect in Holloway's disappearance.

A new witness has emerged, authorities say, who can place van der Sloot and his father, Paulus van der Sloot, near a pond on the island at 4 a.m. on the day Holloway vanished.

The witness told authorities he saw a young man, wet from the chest down and wearing only one shoe, running along a road from the pond to a fast-food restaurant.

The witness said he saw the young man and an older man driving slowly down the road in a red Jeep about 10 minutes later. The pond was not among those searched in the early stages of the investigation, Mos said.

A second witness, a former girlfriend of Joran van der Sloot, also told police he made suspicious-sounding comments while they were on the beach. The witness, publicly known only as Celes, told police van der Sloot said: "Who knows? You may now be on the beach with someone who is able to get rid of a corpse."  Watch the latest developments in the case »

In addition, Mos said, two other witnesses have come forward. He declined to discuss those witnesses, other than to say he is hopeful the case can be solved.

"We are hoping to make a decision by the end of this year or early next year as to whether we will re-arrest [the younger] van der Sloot or not," Mos told CNN.

Also key to the investigation, Mos added, is a Dutch journalist Peter De Vries' videotaped interview with van der Sloot. In the interview, van der Sloot acknowledges a friend helped him get rid of her body. Read how van der Sloot "lost no sleep" over Holloway

Mos said he is confident that the tape, which he characterizes as a confession, is admissible in court. With the new tips and new witnesses whose testimony impeaches earlier statements by van der Sloot and his father, Mos said he might have enough evidence to solve the mystery of what happened to Holloway.

The elder van der Sloot has told police he was at home, asleep in bed until 7 a.m. on the night in question. And, Joran van der Sloot has never been able to explain what happened to his tennis shoes, Mos said.

Holloway's father, Dave, said the new developments caught him by surprise.

"Well, I really hope it's true, because they even have Joran on tape confessing, and I don't know what could be better than that," he said.

Van der Sloot's family and attorney did not return phone calls.

Natalee Holloway, 19, a senior at Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama, was a vibrant member of the school band's dance team, "The Dorians," which is similar to the "Rockettes." She was a straight-A student who planned to study pre-medicine at the University of Alabama.

Don't Miss
Nancy Grace's Cold Cases
CNN.com Crime page
Nancy Grace show page
She vanished in May 2005 while on her senior class trip to the island. She was last seen at the popular night club Carlos 'n Charlie's early on the morning her class was due to fly home.

Her disappearance became the subject of a high-profile search and a massive media frenzy. Holloway family members and friends organized volunteer search efforts in Aruba that went on for months.

Early missteps cost investigators valuable time and evidence. Police at first mistakenly arrested two men who had nothing to do with Holloway's disappearance. And, investigators initially ignored information from witnesses pointing to the three young men last seen with Holloway that night.

When Joran van der Sloot and brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe were arrested, they told conflicting stories. By that time, verifiable facts were hard to come by.

Van der Sloot is a member of a prominent Dutch family in Aruba. At the time of Holloway's disappearance, his father was a judge in training. Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe were arrested and let go twice in connection with Holloway's disappearance.

While they were in jail, police and prosecutors sought corroborating evidence to piece together a motive and theory. They were not successful. Late last year, authorities closed the case without bringing any charges.

"We simply did not yet have the corroborating evidence to take this to trial and win a conviction," prosecutor Mos told CNN. "If we had a body even to determine cause of death, then we could piece some thing together."

In February, the videotape of van der Sloot's taped admission surfaced on Dutch television. De Vries, a famed Dutch journalist, set up a hidden camera capturing van der Sloot talking about Holloway's last moments and how her body was disposed of "like an old rag."

Since then, De Vries has set up another on-camera sting. It aired last week, showing van der Sloot meeting with undercover reporters who posed as Dutch sex industry bosses looking for Thai prostitutes to recruit to the Netherlands as sex slaves.

In the tape, van der Sloot allegedly promises to supply Thai girls for prostitution in Holland and accepts 1,000 Euros as advance payment for his services.


Apparently van der Sloot left the Netherlands late last year and has been living in Thailand for the last few months as a student.

His whereabouts right now are unknown, but Aruban authorities are grateful for the tips that the Dutch documentaries have generated. They hope the tips will bring them closer to a resolution in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.



I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wron??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 08:08:27 PM
oeps
I found this on an Aruban forum
 22 June 2005

Trust me they are involved and guilty!  

they dumped her in the  mondi .. and following day in pieces of the rocks

i googled it and the mondi is a  cemetery

Cemetery of Sabana Basora in Aruba

(http://www.volkskrant.nl/multimedia/archive/00123/Percy_123406p.jpg)

what told caps us ?  



Cemetery of Sabana Basora is not far from Lorenzo's house !

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/cap1.jpg)

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/cap2.jpg)





Cemetery of Sabana Basora And Lorenzo's house !

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/LorenzoXXXX.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 08:13:50 PM
Does anyone understand what Jossy is trying to say?
*********

MANSUR: Most of us believe that what Joran said on the first program of De Vries is correct, that she died in his arms but not from seizure -- we don't know how she died -- that [he] called a friend and the friend dumped her in the ocean. That's what most people believe.  No Jossy, that's not what most people think.

VAN SUSTEREN: Is there any suggestion that there was a boat there that night or any ability to dump her into the ocean?

MANSUR: Well, probably because there were some boats nearby, and especially the boat (INAUDIBLE) the tour (ph) ship, which is a tourist ship. There must have been other boats in the vicinity, as Joran would not have invented this with De Vries.  Jossy, are you serious???

VAN SUSTEREN: In terms of boats, just so that we have some sort of idea of the geography, for people who need to be reminded, how far, for instance, is Aruba from Venezuela?

MANSUR: Fifteen nautical miles is the nearest point within Aruba and Venezuela.

VAN SUSTEREN: And do you know -- and in terms of boats that night, do you know if any thorough investigation, one that you would have confidence in? Has that been done?

MANSUR: No, it hasn't been done because that night, somebody in the police force told the people handling the radar that controls the boats in the vicinity on the coast of Aruba -- told them to put it off.  Yup, the bird was on the wire because a drug deal was going down.

VAN SUSTEREN: Jossy, thank you.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,454527,00.html

Jossey Mansur is not like any newspaper Editor that I have ever met & known, he speaks in circles, mumbles the inaudible when it is convenient, makes promises that he does not keep, "somebody" how about delivering up some credibility with some documentation as to the identity of the "somebody".  He's has displayed himself to be a rumor mongerer & the USA MSM still brings him to the table, I JUST DON'T GET IT.  Yet another self promoter, let's face it a real journalistic Editor has reporter's that produce credible news worthy stories, the Editor is the support to his journalists.  There has been something wrong with this picture for quite some time, imo.





Jossy does seem to be talking in circles.  Last September, he published two articles in Diario about the pond witness who saw Urine and Paulass.  His own Diario articles stated that Urine and Paulass were near the Manserat Pond.  There was a big meeting with Mansur, Caps, DeVries, and the witness in early September.  Caps indicated to us that Jossy would be publishing parts 3, 4, and 5 of the new witness information.  We've never seen these last three parts.  Peter had promised to expose Paulass.  Well, an ex-girlfriend telling Peter that Paulass was pulling the stings is not exposing Paulass, as far as I am concerned.  That is not new information.  Now Jossy is on with Greta telling her that most people believe Natalee died in Urine's arms and he got rid of her in a boat, with a friend.

It does sound like Jossy is talking in circles.   ::MonkeyConfused::  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 08:17:12 PM
Evening monkeys,

Thanks, Johan.  This is veeeeeery interesting! 






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 08:19:58 PM
 posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wron??

*********************

I'm sorry because I must have missed your post in the craziness.  Yes, it does sound like there are four witnesses now - the pond witness, Celeste, and 2 more according to Mos, himself.  And he's now saying that it's hopeful the case can be solved.

Why did he refuse to see Greta if he's hopeful that the case can be solved?

Mos and Jossy are talking in circles right now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 08:23:35 PM
Relatives, friends and acquaintances of Percy Irausquin yesterday afternoon in the cemetery of Sabana Basora in Aruba.

Funeral fairytale Percy in Aruba
Fashion Designer Percy Irausquin buried in his native Aruba Island

(http://www.nrc.nl/multimedia/archive/00170/Begrafenis_Percy_Ir_170754a.JPG)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 08:24:14 PM
Johan - does anyone know if Caps has information about this new cemetery?  Great pictures, Johan.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 08:26:46 PM
Why is Mos NOW CONFIDENT that the PRDV tape is admissable as evidence, and considers it a confession from Joran.  When PRDV broke the story, MOS said it wasn't helpful because it couldn't be used.

  ::MonkeyShocked::::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyShocked::

What has changed?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 08:27:46 PM
posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wron??

*********************

I'm sorry because I must have missed your post in the craziness.  Yes, it does sound like there are four witnesses now - the pond witness, Celeste, and 2 more according to Mos, himself.  And he's now saying that it's hopeful the case can be solved.

Why did he refuse to see Greta if he's hopeful that the case can be solved?

Mos and Jossy are talking in circles right now.

On a lighter note for a moment.My Huskies now have the honor of being the worst team in the country.Hopefully Greta will peel back a few more layers of the onion so to speak on Monday.Does any other Monkey have ideas of the potential of whom Mos is speaking about in terms of the other Two witnesses,as well as why he believes it will be solved??Hot air from Mos,and or smoke screen??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 08:29:53 PM
Hello everyone.  I just read one of my posts and I need to explain something.  I do not believe Kyle is involved in a cover up.  When I said, I think he was sent ashore, I meant that while he was gone ashore, I think at this time evidence could have been tampered with and may well have been tampered with.  I did not mean to insinuate Kyle was involved.  I get to thinking and writing and it comes out scwewy.  Sorry bout that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 08:31:16 PM
Why is Mos NOW CONFIDENT that the PRDV tape is admissable as evidence, and considers it a confession from Joran.  When PRDV broke the story, MOS said it wasn't helpful because it couldn't be used.

  ::MonkeyShocked::::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyShocked::

What has changed?




Boy!! Did his story ever change????  What happened????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 22, 2008, 08:32:25 PM
Johan - does anyone know if Caps has information about this new cemetery?  Great pictures, Johan.

I try to find some info about this cemetery !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 22, 2008, 08:32:55 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 08:33:41 PM
In my opinion, Jossy has always talked in circles.  I have always had to have someone else explain to me what exactly he just said.    ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 08:36:38 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.

Thanx HotShot! ::MonkeyWink::Will return Monkey's after i go to the Gym and work out my frustrations from my 0-11 Washington Huskies..See ya'll in a few..Keepthefaith!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 08:36:45 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.

I do hope you know what you are talking about and there may be more arrests in the very near future.  It has been such a struggle to be patient.  Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 08:40:24 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.
Can Greta's info, Tim Miller's 3 new witnesses, Caps' story, AND Kermit's allegations ALL fit together??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 08:40:35 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.

Thanx HotShot! ::MonkeyWink::Will return Monkey's after i go to the Gym and work out my frustrations from my 0-11 Washington Huskies..See ya'll in a few..Keepthefaith!

LOL, when you wrote about your huskies being the worst team in the country, I thought you had a dog sled team!   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 08:42:13 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.

Thanx HotShot! ::MonkeyWink::Will return Monkey's after i go to the Gym and work out my frustrations from my 0-11 Washington Huskies..See ya'll in a few..Keepthefaith!

LOL, when you wrote about your huskies being the worst team in the country, I thought you had a dog sled team!   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Me too.  I was thinking IDITAROD IN ALASKA!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 22, 2008, 08:45:09 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.

Thanx HotShot! ::MonkeyWink::Will return Monkey's after i go to the Gym and work out my frustrations from my 0-11 Washington Huskies..See ya'll in a few..Keepthefaith!

LOL, when you wrote about your huskies being the worst team in the country, I thought you had a dog sled team!   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Me too.  I was thinking IDITAROD IN ALASKA!!!!!!

A dog sled team probably would give us more victoryies then Ty Willingham.LOL.I will Keepthefaith that we'll get this turned around in the years to come.Can't wait for more arrests.I just hope all ducks are in a row before the move forward.Although i despise "Ducks".Oregon Ducks.Sorry if there are any Oregonians..Be bak in a few after the Gym.Keep up the work Monkeys.... ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 08:46:26 PM
posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wron??

*********************

I'm sorry because I must have missed your post in the craziness.  Yes, it does sound like there are four witnesses now - the pond witness, Celeste, and 2 more according to Mos, himself.  And he's now saying that it's hopeful the case can be solved.

Why did he refuse to see Greta if he's hopeful that the case can be solved?

Mos and Jossy are talking in circles right now.

On a lighter note for a moment.My Huskies now have the honor of being the worst team in the country.Hopefully Greta will peel back a few more layers of the onion so to speak on Monday.Does any other Monkey have ideas of the potential of whom Mos is speaking about in terms of the other Two witnesses,as well as why he believes it will be solved??Hot air from Mos,and or smoke screen??




It's just so hard to tell.  Aruba is so masterful with smoke screens and diversions.  They are diabolical.  On the other hand, perhaps someone has presented something that Mos finally can't refute and he's under pressure to step up to the plate. 

I didn't get the part about the Huskies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Dayhiker on November 22, 2008, 08:46:35 PM
Why is Mos NOW CONFIDENT that the PRDV tape is admissable as evidence, and considers it a confession from Joran.  When PRDV broke the story, MOS said it wasn't helpful because it couldn't be used.

  ::MonkeyShocked::::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyShocked::

What has changed?





When the tape came out Hans showed it to the judge, who I believe was the ever reappearing Smid, and the judge told him that the tape was of no value because Joran lies a lot. Hans promptly retreated to the beach, buried his head in the sand and this is the first of the tape we've heard since.

All of a sudden the tape is of value? Maybe pressure is being brought to bear on Mos. He damn sure needs some motivation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Dayhiker on November 22, 2008, 08:51:51 PM

It's just so hard to tell.  Aruba is so masterful with smoke screens and diversions.  They are diabolical.  On the other hand, perhaps someone has presented something that Mos finally can't refute and he's under pressure to step up to the plate. 

I didn't get the part about the Huskies.


He was supposedly going to be fired, but now we hear he is retiring back to Holland the first of the year after he decides to close the case, which he has already done once. It will definitely take somebody above Mos' head to get action in the case. He has been doing his best Arlene Schippers imitation (There is no evidence!!!) since the judge crammed Joran's confession tape up his ass.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 22, 2008, 08:53:30 PM
Didn't we already see this "latest" statement from Mos about 3-4 days ago? This "story" was published the same day Greta told us about this coming Monday's story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 08:54:46 PM
Didn't we already see this "latest" statement from Mos about 3-4 days ago? This "story" was published the same day Greta told us about this coming Monday's story.

That is what I thought.  I must have missed something.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 08:55:26 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.



HotShot - what do you know that you aren't saying?  Please fill us in.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 08:57:30 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 08:58:13 PM
Yes, I think so, but there are still some missing pieces.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 22, 2008, 08:59:06 PM
If I recall correctly, and based on this old Amigo article, the radar in Aruba wasn't 100%.  Also, the Soul Beach Concert ended that night, and I think that may have been a reason to turn it off.  Maybe it was like an annoying car alarm..."a door is ajar"  or a never ending reminder to buckle your seat belt.  

Quote
Amigoe
November 2005

"Radar System Not Watertight"

ORANJESTAD — The radar-system that monitors the coastline is not watertight. People still manage to enter Aruba illegally from sea. This was stated by the general commander of Warda nos Costa, Gerold Dompig. His statement challenges the words of Justice-minister Rudy Croes (MEP) who closed a lease contract for the radar equipment last year.

In June, July and August 2004 the radars were put into operation as a test. Vessels were placed out at sea to test the radar’s reach. The results were positive and the lease contract was signed till August 2007. A year later it becomes apparent that the radar’s efficiency is somewhat different in reality compared to the theoretical press presentation of Raytheon. Project coordinator Kelly confirms Dompig’s statement that high waves influence the efficiency of the radar. “The radar works well, but not during all types of weather. Heavy rainfall causes all kinds of spots on the screen, which makes it difficult to discern small boats. But, then again, no radar is full proof.”

Dompig also was on a tv show and went on and on about how the radar worked so well that night--they were able to account for every boat that night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 09:02:18 PM
If I recall correctly, and based on this old Amigo article, the radar in Aruba wasn't 100%.  Also, the Soul Beach Concert ended that night, and I think that may have been a reason to turn it off.  Maybe it was like an annoying car alarm..."a door is ajar"  or a never ending reminder to buckle your seat belt.  

Quote
Amigoe
November 2005

"Radar System Not Watertight"

ORANJESTAD — The radar-system that monitors the coastline is not watertight. People still manage to enter Aruba illegally from sea. This was stated by the general commander of Warda nos Costa, Gerold Dompig. His statement challenges the words of Justice-minister Rudy Croes (MEP) who closed a lease contract for the radar equipment last year.

In June, July and August 2004 the radars were put into operation as a test. Vessels were placed out at sea to test the radar’s reach. The results were positive and the lease contract was signed till August 2007. A year later it becomes apparent that the radar’s efficiency is somewhat different in reality compared to the theoretical press presentation of Raytheon. Project coordinator Kelly confirms Dompig’s statement that high waves influence the efficiency of the radar. “The radar works well, but not during all types of weather. Heavy rainfall causes all kinds of spots on the screen, which makes it difficult to discern small boats. But, then again, no radar is full proof.”

Dompig also was on a tv show and went on and on about how the radar worked so well that night--they were able to account for every boat that night.


Cover, cover, cover, lie, lie, lie..................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 22, 2008, 09:03:19 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

Butterfly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 09:04:10 PM
Hey Blonde.  I thought we ID'd him.  I think the guy in the green shirt looks a lot like Papito......with a heavier mustache than earlier pictures.

 :smt102 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2008, 09:07:45 PM
Why is Mos NOW CONFIDENT that the PRDV tape is admissable as evidence, and considers it a confession from Joran.  When PRDV broke the story, MOS said it wasn't helpful because it couldn't be used.

  ::MonkeyShocked::::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyShocked::

What has changed?




OK,  I was out for the afternoon, but when did this statement from MOS happen???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 09:11:48 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us



I still say he reminds me of Groucho Marx as J. Cheever Loophole.  Where does that leave us as far as Deutekom being the mastermind?  Papito looks thiner in the picture on Persistence and his eyebrows look thicker.  The mustache is also larger.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 09:12:43 PM
It looks like there are two new witnesses in addition to Celes and the witness near the pond.
******************

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/18/grace.coldcase.holloway/?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail
By Rupa Mikkilineni
Nancy Grace Producer
CNN
     
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Authorities in Aruba say they're looking into new evidence that could lead to an arrest 3˝ years after Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared on a senior class trip to the island.

 
Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared while on vacation in Aruba with classmates in 2005.

 1 of 2  Aruban police are investigating two new tips they hope will provide the corroborating evidence they need to make an arrest, lead prosecutor Hans Mos told CNN.

He would not discuss details but said police again consider Dutch student Joran van der Sloot to be the prime suspect in Holloway's disappearance.

A new witness has emerged, authorities say, who can place van der Sloot and his father, Paulus van der Sloot, near a pond on the island at 4 a.m. on the day Holloway vanished.

The witness told authorities he saw a young man, wet from the chest down and wearing only one shoe, running along a road from the pond to a fast-food restaurant.

The witness said he saw the young man and an older man driving slowly down the road in a red Jeep about 10 minutes later. The pond was not among those searched in the early stages of the investigation, Mos said.

A second witness, a former girlfriend of Joran van der Sloot, also told police he made suspicious-sounding comments while they were on the beach. The witness, publicly known only as Celes, told police van der Sloot said: "Who knows? You may now be on the beach with someone who is able to get rid of a corpse."  Watch the latest developments in the case »

In addition, Mos said, two other witnesses have come forward. He declined to discuss those witnesses, other than to say he is hopeful the case can be solved.

"We are hoping to make a decision by the end of this year or early next year as to whether we will re-arrest [the younger] van der Sloot or not," Mos told CNN.

Also key to the investigation, Mos added, is a Dutch journalist Peter De Vries' videotaped interview with van der Sloot. In the interview, van der Sloot acknowledges a friend helped him get rid of her body. Read how van der Sloot "lost no sleep" over Holloway

Mos said he is confident that the tape, which he characterizes as a confession, is admissible in court. With the new tips and new witnesses whose testimony impeaches earlier statements by van der Sloot and his father, Mos said he might have enough evidence to solve the mystery of what happened to Holloway.

The elder van der Sloot has told police he was at home, asleep in bed until 7 a.m. on the night in question. And, Joran van der Sloot has never been able to explain what happened to his tennis shoes, Mos said.

Holloway's father, Dave, said the new developments caught him by surprise.

"Well, I really hope it's true, because they even have Joran on tape confessing, and I don't know what could be better than that," he said.

Van der Sloot's family and attorney did not return phone calls.

Natalee Holloway, 19, a senior at Mountain Brook High School in suburban Birmingham, Alabama, was a vibrant member of the school band's dance team, "The Dorians," which is similar to the "Rockettes." She was a straight-A student who planned to study pre-medicine at the University of Alabama.

Don't Miss
Nancy Grace's Cold Cases
CNN.com Crime page
Nancy Grace show page
She vanished in May 2005 while on her senior class trip to the island. She was last seen at the popular night club Carlos 'n Charlie's early on the morning her class was due to fly home.

Her disappearance became the subject of a high-profile search and a massive media frenzy. Holloway family members and friends organized volunteer search efforts in Aruba that went on for months.

Early missteps cost investigators valuable time and evidence. Police at first mistakenly arrested two men who had nothing to do with Holloway's disappearance. And, investigators initially ignored information from witnesses pointing to the three young men last seen with Holloway that night.

When Joran van der Sloot and brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe were arrested, they told conflicting stories. By that time, verifiable facts were hard to come by.

Van der Sloot is a member of a prominent Dutch family in Aruba. At the time of Holloway's disappearance, his father was a judge in training. Joran van der Sloot and the brothers Kalpoe were arrested and let go twice in connection with Holloway's disappearance.

While they were in jail, police and prosecutors sought corroborating evidence to piece together a motive and theory. They were not successful. Late last year, authorities closed the case without bringing any charges.

"We simply did not yet have the corroborating evidence to take this to trial and win a conviction," prosecutor Mos told CNN. "If we had a body even to determine cause of death, then we could piece some thing together."

In February, the videotape of van der Sloot's taped admission surfaced on Dutch television. De Vries, a famed Dutch journalist, set up a hidden camera capturing van der Sloot talking about Holloway's last moments and how her body was disposed of "like an old rag."

Since then, De Vries has set up another on-camera sting. It aired last week, showing van der Sloot meeting with undercover reporters who posed as Dutch sex industry bosses looking for Thai prostitutes to recruit to the Netherlands as sex slaves.

In the tape, van der Sloot allegedly promises to supply Thai girls for prostitution in Holland and accepts 1,000 Euros as advance payment for his services.


Apparently van der Sloot left the Netherlands late last year and has been living in Thailand for the last few months as a student.

His whereabouts right now are unknown, but Aruban authorities are grateful for the tips that the Dutch documentaries have generated. They hope the tips will bring them closer to a resolution in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.



I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wron??

Complete 180.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: mariloo on November 22, 2008, 09:14:05 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us



I still say he reminds me of Groucho Marx as J. Cheever Loophole.  Where does that leave us as far as Deutekom being the mastermind?  Papito looks thiner in the picture on Persistence and his eyebrows look thicker.  The mustache is also larger.

He looks the same color as his shirt on the boat.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 09:15:17 PM
January 25  John Silvetti:

After compiling and reviewing the information, the search area was selected by Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti. Upon completion of the sonar runs in this area, 65 ROV dives were performed by Offshore Innovative Solutions (OIS) on targets identified by sonar. Divers from the Aruban Police Diving Division and Underwater Expeditions made several dives and retrieved samples which were delivered for analysis.

 :smt102

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

Butterfly.




Oh Lala's - I forgot all about the butterfly.  You're brilliant.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 09:15:17 PM

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

So glad to see yet another one revealed.  Criminal Coward.

Thanks for bringing that forward, Blonde.  Your thread is coming along very nicely, very useful.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 09:16:56 PM
forgot

the two photo's match, to me that is a definite positive identification


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:17:22 PM
Why is Mos NOW CONFIDENT that the PRDV tape is admissable as evidence, and considers it a confession from Joran.  When PRDV broke the story, MOS said it wasn't helpful because it couldn't be used.

  ::MonkeyShocked::::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyShocked::

What has changed?





When the tape came out Hans showed it to the judge, who I believe was the ever reappearing Smid, and the judge told him that the tape was of no value because Joran lies a lot. Hans promptly retreated to the beach, buried his head in the sand and this is the first of the tape we've heard since.

All of a sudden the tape is of value? Maybe pressure is being brought to bear on Mos. He damn sure needs some motivation.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DON"T TRUST THIS YET
JUDGE RICK SMID SHIELDS MAIN SUSPECT FROM PROSECUTION

In a hearing on June 1, 2005 Dutch judge Rick Smid ruled there was sufficient evidence to keep Joran van der Sloot in detention for an additional 30 days. Then in a baffling move, he flies back to Curacao and faxes in a reversal of the ruling he’d made only a few hours earlier, freeing van der Sloot from jail. Within three days Joran van der Sloot was on an airplane for Holland, and to make sure van der Sloot would never face prosecution, the judges gave Joran and the Kalpoe brothers immunity from ever being questioned again about this case.
___________________________________

JUDGE SMID released Joran.


Rich Smid – Judge who released J2K in September. Dutch judge in Curacao. As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.
JUDGE SMID (the Judge who let the suspects free) is part of this
group: the National Colalition for Drug Policy change


JUDGE Rick Smid – reported friend of PVDS, stayed at Van der Sloot home. Judge who released J2K in September. Dutch judge in Curacao. As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.


TWITTY: list of inconsistencies was presented before Judge Smit. The reasonable doubt was there.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0509/13/ng.01.html
__________________________________________

QUESTIONS ABOUT RICK SMID AND HIS FELLOW JUDGE BOB WIT:

*Why would a judge block the search of the home belonging to a suspect in a murder investigation? Was this because Paulus Van Der Sloot was a Dutch judge in training? If not, why were the two black security guards not given the same consideration days earlier when their homes were ransacked by investigators and police?

*Why would Judge Rick Smid rule a suspect be held in custody for another 30 days and reverse his own ruling within hours after he had fled the island of Aruba to his office in Curacao? Was he afraid he might have to explain his ruling to the media while he was still on the island of Aruba? What was Judge Smid afraid of? Why the deception?

*Why did Judge Rick Smid overlook incriminating testimony by a suspect and release him by citing his “schoolwork” as being the more important factor in the case? Since when does a suspect’s "schoolwork" take precedence over finding justice for a murdered tourist? Is it because Joran Van der Sloot is Dutch and Natalee Holloway is merely a missing victim?

*What kind of judge can look at basic, rudimentary statements with conflicting testimonies from three suspects and release them from further questioning by the authorities?
______________________________________________

Why would Judge Smid not take this revelation into consideration when he ruled that Paulus could be released from detention; declared him no longer a suspect and awarded him compensation

It can be assumed that the investigative team obtained a statement from Mickey John regarding this conversation with Deepak; forwarded this statement to the prosecutor who, in turn, presented it to Judge Smid. If this did not occur it can be concluded that Paulus Van der Sloot received preferential treatment
____________________________________
RICK SMID'S HISTORY OF LENIENCE ON CRIMINALS RAISES QUESTIONS OF HIS INTEGRITY AND ABILITY TO SERVE AS A JUDGE. IF RICK SMID WILL DO THIS FOR NON-DUTCH CRIMINALS, IMAGINE WHAT HE WILL DO FOR HIS DUTCH FRIENDS AND CO-WORKERS

Was he at  the VanDerSloots house when the original search warrant was changed?
GRRRR


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 09:21:25 PM
http://aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=30625&start=0&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

Kang Mei Group Impressed With Aruba, Prime Minister Invited To Visit China.

April 24th 2006, Aruba.


ORANJESTAD-The Prime Minister of Aruba, Nelson Oduber has received a
formal invitation to visit the firm Kang Mei International Company based
in the city of Chiu Chih-Huang, China. Kang Mei Group is busy in
positioning itself strategically towards the Latin American market and is
interested in Aruba as the Chinese gateway to South America.

Kang Mei Group visited Aruba in March 2006 and held talks with Greg
Peterson (Director, Aruba Freezone) and the Prime Minister. The group is
very impressed with the island infrastructure and economic performance.

The intention of Kang Mei Group is to organize a trade exhibition in Aruba
in October 2006. The goal of the exhibition is to attract a hundred Chinese
companies to Aruba to showcase their products at the convention center.
The group hopes to attract hundreds of South American businessmen to
the island for the trade-show in so to build business networks and close
sale contracts.

Kang Mei Group will open two "Aruba Promotion Offices" in China, one in
the megalopolis of Beijing and the other in Guangzhou (Kanton). The
costs of the promotion offices in China are completely covered by the
Chinese. The offices are part of the strategy to convert Aruba into the
Chinese gateway to South America. The purpose of the offices is to
convince Chinese businessmen to participate at the first trade exhibition
in Aruba organized by the group.

Oduber is invited to officially open the promotion offices in China next
month. The representatives of Kang Mei-Group have arranged a large
number of meetings for the Prime Minister with top Chinese officials and
business representatives.

The Chinese economy is growing at a very fast pace and the eyes of
China are set on doing business with South America. Oduber will make
use of the invitation as a great opportunity to build on solid economic ties
between China and Aruba. One of the goals of Oduber is to diversify
Aruba's tourism sector that is at present very dependent on the U.S.

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber will visit China in May with a delegation
consisting out of 3 additional persons that include Augustine Vrolijk
(Director Foreign Affairs), Frendsel Giel (Assistant Managing Director,
Aruba Investment Bank) and Greg Peterson (Director, Freezone Aruba).



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 09:24:43 PM

If this guy Edwin Papito is the guy in the green shirt in the above picture, then it is so obvious  to me why I can't get an answer from Kyle on his ID
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)

DIRTY HAND REVEALED
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/EdwinPapitoCommenciaOnprestence.jpg)
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:32 pm
The sacrifice is the correct food to appease the gods, arawaks, and cowboys
but the foundations of the house of babylon will shake
even harder if Arawak Dirty Hand is revealed.


EDWIN 'PAPITO' COMEMENCIA - DIRTY HAND


http://64.233.169.132/search?q=cache:sXzHg7jwHvUJ:zoltanzion.blogspot.com/2007/03/dirty-hand-revealed.html+Edwin+Papito&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

So glad to see yet another one revealed.  Criminal Coward.

Thanks for bringing that forward, Blonde.  Your thread is coming along very nicely, very useful.




This picture was taken on December 30th.  If these are all Aruban ALE, where are their uniforms?  Why are they all in jeans?  Are they trying to fool someone into thinking that if this group all went to the Persistence together in jeans that nobody would think it was official business?   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 09:28:18 PM
Well wouldn't surprise me if that disgrace to justice Hans Mos wouldn't be bringing ringer witnesses forward to contradict the evidence that is known to him, that is why any co-operation or forwarning to such a corrupt individual imo is not in the best interest of the case.

Have evidence, bring it forward into the international press, end of story.  Can't sue anybody if it is the truth.  Let the rats scammer to fix that once it's already out of the box & they got nothing from their corrupt manufacturing, how could that be reversed without adequate timing that would of course reveal it's falsehood.

That to me is why they were successful to the extent that they were, people were treating them in a civilized manner when they deserved to be treated like wild animals, NOT TO BE TRUSTED.  Civilized, they aren't even humane.  The whole crew of them are a disgrace to their countries & nationalities.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:28:20 PM
forgot

the two photo's match, to me that is a definite positive identification

Thank You Altruist I have been working hard on it.

I  also think that photo is a match that EDWIN 'PAPITO photo was from 2005 so he would look a little older. This is very bad they took the evidence and poor Kyle didn't know how evil they were.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 09:30:06 PM
Found a couple more of Papito to compare...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito3.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 09:33:32 PM
DON"T TRUST THIS YET
JUDGE RICK SMID SHIELDS MAIN SUSPECT FROM PROSECUTION

In a hearing on June 1, 2005 Dutch judge Rick Smid ruled there was sufficient evidence to keep Joran van der Sloot in detention for an additional 30 days. Then in a baffling move, he flies back to Curacao and faxes in a reversal of the ruling he’d made only a few hours earlier, freeing van der Sloot from jail. Within three days Joran van der Sloot was on an airplane for Holland, and to make sure van der Sloot would never face prosecution, the judges gave Joran and the Kalpoe brothers immunity from ever being questioned again about this case.___________________________________


What is this about immunity from being questioned again.  Was the second arrest last year just a performance?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 22, 2008, 09:36:23 PM
Thank You VMS my chest feels tight, PB going up need to watch TV and chill.
I hate them for what they have done.Nite all


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 09:46:18 PM
Thank You VMS my chest feels tight, PB going up need to watch TV and chill.
I hate them for what they have done.Nite all


YW.

Go relax and sleep well, Blonde.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 09:46:42 PM
Found a couple more of Papito to compare...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito3.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito.jpg)





Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 09:48:36 PM
Good Evening Fellow Monkey Sleuths

Have we ever identified the guy in the red shirt?  He came on board with ALE.  I was going to post this the other night and thought everyone would think I was crazy.... and I may be.... but he looks like Frans Deutkom (sp?).

Blonde, our pic guru, I was looking through the thread where you posted the pictures and the one of Deutkom sorta running/walking fast in suit and tie and his hair looks kinda wild?!?  Do you remember it?  Could you bring it over. 

I just want everyone to compare the two.  Put a cap on Deutkom and see what you think.

 ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 09:50:54 PM
Found a couple more of Papito to compare...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito3.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito.jpg)




Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.





I think the lighting of the picture makes him appear darker in one.  Look at the "point" of his head and at the curve of his hair around his bald forehead.  Looks the same to me.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 09:56:27 PM
Did I run everybody off............

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 10:01:25 PM
Found a couple more of Papito to compare...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito3.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito.jpg)





Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.





Now, I dunno, SS.  ::MonkeyConfused::

April:
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito4.jpg)

October:
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito5.jpg)

Does the other guy in uniform look familiar to anyone else???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 10:07:37 PM
I wish the pic of the green shirt guy was enlarged so we could see his face better.  Sorry I'm no good with that stuff.

Now I'm not sure with these other photos.  That mustache sure looks different.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 10:09:30 PM
DTKM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 10:16:07 PM
In my opinion, Jossy has always talked in circles.  I have always had to have someone else explain to me what exactly he just said.    ::MonkeyConfused::

Round and Round the Mulberry Bush !!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::
Dogs do not shit where they eat.
I am a firm believer in this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 10:19:35 PM
DTKM

Thank you SS.  Put a cap on this guy, same square chin, both are wearing glasses.  It really looks like the same guy.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 10:20:41 PM
forgot

the two photo's match, to me that is a definite positive identification

Thank You Altruist I have been working hard on it.

I  also think that photo is a match that EDWIN 'PAPITO photo was from 2005 so he would look a little older. This is very bad they took the evidence and poor Kyle didn't know how evil they were.

I know there are American traitor's on that devils island but I am banking on there were some American traitor's that were traitor's ONLY TO THE CORRUPT.  It only came to me today, double agent's, they end up being loyal really only to one, the right one, in my mind that is how I am reconciling.

Justice will be done, with or without the Aruban Office of Ministry.  As a matter of fact if I was one of those cowardly criminals I'd be scurrying real fast to come forward & confess it all to protect my cowardly ass from the great big wrecking ball heading right for the devils island & many if not most of it's institutional corrupt.  They are in for it & nobody will save their sorry cowardly selves as they bring their families to ruin with them.

I have faith in American's.  The good amongst us way out number the bad, unlike it appears to be in the politically active & business owner's of the devils island.  The first indication of that to me was A Flanegan, she knew the corruption was working & rather than going after it she resigned from that case worried about only her own sorry cowardly ass, deciding to be part of the problem & not a solution, I was very saddened when I came to learn that.

Join me in having faith that they will be coming down & hard.  Although I empathize with their families, the cowardly criminals should have thought of their families before they took such disgusting actions as there is no justification, now not only they will pay but so will their families.  My question for them is:  Was it really worth putting what you should value most at risk to save a perverted loser from being held accountable for putting to death a lovely young woman & denying the decent return of her to her family, her church & her country??????????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 10:23:03 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if i'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong.  Can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about.  But you WILL know.
Can Greta's info, Tim Miller's 3 new witnesses, Caps' story, AND Kermit's allegations ALL fit together??

That is a very good question...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 22, 2008, 10:26:28 PM
DTKM

Thank you SS.  Put a cap on this guy, same square chin, both are wearing glasses.  It really looks like the same guy.



You could be right KYcat.
If they didn't think it was Natalee why would Mos, Dirty Hand and Papito
have even come on the boat?  They aren't needed to make a dive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 10:27:54 PM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 22, 2008, 10:28:31 PM
Don't suppose anyone is even remotely interested in why Joran was said to have been sleeping at the school that first week?  You know, right by the new construction of the new school and the rock piles the kids had previously picked up to clear the land for the new construction?  Or the new road leading to it?

No?  I didn't think so but I do think something like this more mundane situation is more likely and it doesn't involve more than just Joran yet again.  Remember he was seen by classmates to walk into the woods during the next day at school.  He could have been meeting somebody but also could have been checking things.

I am going to wait and see the new information Greta presents Monday before going in any direction.  Once it is on her program, surely it will then be on YouTube or in transcripts.  Be sure to save them and not just a link to them as her programs disappear over time and can no longer be accessed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 22, 2008, 10:30:09 PM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.


Maybe he's seasick.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 10:35:12 PM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.

Maybe he's seasick.

Thanks Anna, I needed that laugh.  Am enjoying it as I type this to you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 10:35:27 PM

It's just so hard to tell.  Aruba is so masterful with smoke screens and diversions.  They are diabolical.  On the other hand, perhaps someone has presented something that Mos finally can't refute and he's under pressure to step up to the plate. 

I didn't get the part about the Huskies.


He was supposedly going to be fired, but now we hear he is retiring back to Holland the first of the year after he decides to close the case, which he has already done once. It will definitely take somebody above Mos' head to get action in the case. He has been doing his best Arlene Schippers imitation (There is no evidence!!!) since the judge crammed Joran's confession tape up his ass.  

retiring back to Holland the first of the year after he decides to close the case
Closing the case and introducing a new prosecutor has definitely been a trend...
And what a crock of shit. It has been well telegraphed in the past...


Very funny !!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 10:35:29 PM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.


Maybe he's seasick.



 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2008, 10:36:50 PM
Don't suppose anyone is even remotely interested in why Joran was said to have been sleeping at the school that first week?  You know, right by the new construction of the new school and the rock piles the kids had previously picked up to clear the land for the new construction?  Or the new road leading to it?

No?  I didn't think so but I do think something like this more mundane situation is more likely and it doesn't involve more than just Joran yet again.  Remember he was seen by classmates to walk into the woods during the next day at school.  He could have been meeting somebody but also could have been checking things.

I am going to wait and see the new information Greta presents Monday before going in any direction.  Once it is on her program, surely it will then be on YouTube or in transcripts.  Be sure to save them and not just a link to them as her programs disappear over time and can no longer be accessed.



Or, he could have been going to the woods just to smoke some pot.  I do think it is very strange that 1) he would be sleeping there and 2) he was allowed to sleep there.  Just so bizarre. they had to know he was sleeping there.  Who allowed that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 10:38:02 PM
Edward, wanted to thank you for bringing the geneology of the stoolscum's forward yesterday.  Finished reading it in the early morning of today & did find it interesting.  I had heard the original summary of the patriarch's beginnings which were spot on with the factual data as presented.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 22, 2008, 10:40:32 PM
Could be Papito:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Persist1.jpg)

I don't think DTKM:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/persist2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: LoRain on November 22, 2008, 10:43:33 PM
From Joran's 5/31/05 statement -
Quote
We drove past the Lighthouse and after that to the Holiday Inn Hotel.  In the car the girl said that her mother was the sister of Hitler and that they owned a plantation.  She also said that Deepak and Satish were black and that black people worked as slaves on the plantations. The girl was very drunk.


From a link at BFN, quoting something from RU.  This is a translation from Joran's book (page 124?) -
Quote
She kept on asking me where she was from. I had told her that I didn't know. Natalee asked me this about five or six times. Natalee also told me that she was really good at French kissing and that she wanted to stay alone with me and French kiss. Natalee then told me again that her mother was the sister of "Hitler".


page 327 - from translation posted at BFN
Quote
There are whisperings that Natalee and Beth had a poor relationship. Joran notes that Natalee's friends and Beth have contradicted this, but then asks why, in a drunk coneition, she said her mother was "Hitler's sister". She didn't just say that to him, her girlfriends confirm she said it to them also. Joran says this is a remark that someone "just doesn't make" about one's mother, and it makes one believe that Natalee thought Beth was too "authoritarian".


Current Affair interview -
Quote
Current Affair
Reporter: What did she tell you? That you can remember.
Joran: She told me a lot of things. One thing she told me was that her mother was Hitler’s sister's daughter. I don’t know what she was talking, a lot of strange things...

Joran's 06/09/05 statement
Quote
I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times.

Satish 06/11/05 statement
Quote
While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that. My brother continued to drive into the direction of the "lighthouse".
::MonkeyConfused::

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES 6/17/05 statement
Quote
After that if I am not mistaken it was the beginning of June 2005, it was a Friday- or Saturday night that I bought a pizza at Domino's and then went to Joran's place. (with this the 3rd or 4th of June is meant; comment Croes). On that day I arrived at approximately 21.00 hours at Joran's place. I saw that "Koen", "Sander" and Joran were in the apartment of Joran and that they were playing poker. Koen and Sander are brothers but I do not know their last name. I had told Joran that I would be bringing them a pizza and a coca-cola. I also asked Joran if they had found the missing girl. Joran answered me that the missing girl had not been found yet. Then Joran told me that Deepak, Satish and he drove in the four door grey car, make Honda Civic that was owned by Deepak to "Carlos & Charlies" and that the three of them had then driven around with the missing girl. According to Joran the girl was strange. Joran told me that the girl was strange because she told him that her mother was "Hitler's sister". Joran told me that the girl wanted to see the sharks in the sea of Aruba and that they had dropped off the missing girl at the Holiday Inn Hotel.

Deepak 6/29/05 statement
Quote
On your question whether I heard Natalee say in the car that her mother was Hitler's sister, that they owned a plantation and that they had black people as employees. I had only heard the word Hitler. The rest I did not hear. Joran told me later all the things the girl had said.

Chapter 8 translation of Joran's book at BFN, pages 13 & 14 -
Quote
They start kissing again and Natalee asks if the 2 Kalpoes are his slaves. No Joran laughs and asks her why?

Natalee responds that her parents have a plantation and the people who work there are black guys. To her all blacks are slaves.

Joran does not know if the Kalpoes heard this or not.

translation of Joran's book at BFN -
Quote
P 334

Joran says: "Natalee did use cocaine that week. She had it in her possession and offered it twice to a peer, which was shown in Peter R. de Vries’ broadcast about the case."

Also that week there were many boats close to shore because of the Soul Beach Music Festival. Maybe somebody saw from a boat that she was alone on the beach, took her on a boat, raped her, killed her and threw the body overboard at sea.

Joran says that it's also not impossible Natalee was kidnapped to be a sex slave in South America. But Joran says if that had happened he thinks she would have been murdered because all the publicity made her too much of a risk to her kidnappers.

CHAPTER 11 Breakthrough by Best Friend Freddy - from BFN
Quote
P153

The girl said that if the Kalpoe brothers would had lived in her city, they would have been slaves. After this they drove to the hotel. When the girl opened the door of the car she fell on the ground. Joran wanted to help her, but she pushed him away.

Deepak Kalpoe Statement of June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
To your question whether I can make detailed statements about the conversations that were happening while we were driving this route, I can say the following. I did hear some things. I heard the girl say something about sharks and "Lighthouse". The comment she made about the videoclip. Joran had told me two days later that the girl had asked him whether me and my brother had been his slaves. The girl had told Joran that she was from Alabama, and that she didn't like people of dark colour and that they owned a farm and that the people working on their farm were all of dark colour.


Satish Kalpoe Statement June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.


I believe KJ formally asked the US State Department if Beth was related to hitler... ::MonkeyEek::




Did Natalee's family employ black people?...Did they own a farm or plantation?...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 10:45:50 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 10:47:37 PM
Or, he could have been going to the woods just to smoke some pot.  I do think it is very strange that 1) he would be sleeping there and 2) he was allowed to sleep there.  Just so bizarre. they had to know he was sleeping there.  Who allowed that?

I agree it is mighty strange.  Suspect that Mommydearest the pigvanderstoolscum told her vile offspring to take her key from the key chain & let himself in.  The paranoia was ever so present that those big ole cowboys would come to the house break the door down & give him what he deserved to make him come clean or kill him in their warped killing minds.  The next day the pig just made a phone call to the admin at her school what she had done to protect the "poor innocent boychild" from those big ole bad American cowboys  & there you have it.  Poor innocent boychild, my ass. 

& you know the pigvanderstoolscum had to have come from some status or money as attractive & her would not fit together in a sentence even when she was young.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 10:55:08 PM
From Joran's 5/31/05 statement -
Quote
We drove past the Lighthouse and after that to the Holiday Inn Hotel.  In the car the girl said that her mother was the sister of Hitler and that they owned a plantation.  She also said that Deepak and Satish were black and that black people worked as slaves on the plantations. The girl was very drunk.


From a link at BFN, quoting something from RU.  This is a translation from Joran's book (page 124?) -
Quote
She kept on asking me where she was from. I had told her that I didn't know. Natalee asked me this about five or six times. Natalee also told me that she was really good at French kissing and that she wanted to stay alone with me and French kiss. Natalee then told me again that her mother was the sister of "Hitler".


page 327 - from translation posted at BFN
Quote
There are whisperings that Natalee and Beth had a poor relationship. Joran notes that Natalee's friends and Beth have contradicted this, but then asks why, in a drunk coneition, she said her mother was "Hitler's sister". She didn't just say that to him, her girlfriends confirm she said it to them also. Joran says this is a remark that someone "just doesn't make" about one's mother, and it makes one believe that Natalee thought Beth was too "authoritarian".


Current Affair interview -
Quote
Current Affair
Reporter: What did she tell you? That you can remember.
Joran: She told me a lot of things. One thing she told me was that her mother was Hitler’s sister's daughter. I don’t know what she was talking, a lot of strange things...

Joran's 06/09/05 statement
Quote
I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times.

Satish 06/11/05 statement
Quote
While my brother was driving towards the "lighthouse" Joran and the girl were talking in the back of the car. I could not hear what Joran and the girl were talking about. The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that. My brother continued to drive into the direction of the "lighthouse".
::MonkeyConfused::

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES 6/17/05 statement
Quote
After that if I am not mistaken it was the beginning of June 2005, it was a Friday- or Saturday night that I bought a pizza at Domino's and then went to Joran's place. (with this the 3rd or 4th of June is meant; comment Croes). On that day I arrived at approximately 21.00 hours at Joran's place. I saw that "Koen", "Sander" and Joran were in the apartment of Joran and that they were playing poker. Koen and Sander are brothers but I do not know their last name. I had told Joran that I would be bringing them a pizza and a coca-cola. I also asked Joran if they had found the missing girl. Joran answered me that the missing girl had not been found yet. Then Joran told me that Deepak, Satish and he drove in the four door grey car, make Honda Civic that was owned by Deepak to "Carlos & Charlies" and that the three of them had then driven around with the missing girl. According to Joran the girl was strange. Joran told me that the girl was strange because she told him that her mother was "Hitler's sister". Joran told me that the girl wanted to see the sharks in the sea of Aruba and that they had dropped off the missing girl at the Holiday Inn Hotel.

Deepak 6/29/05 statement
Quote
On your question whether I heard Natalee say in the car that her mother was Hitler's sister, that they owned a plantation and that they had black people as employees. I had only heard the word Hitler. The rest I did not hear. Joran told me later all the things the girl had said.

Chapter 8 translation of Joran's book at BFN, pages 13 & 14 -
Quote
They start kissing again and Natalee asks if the 2 Kalpoes are his slaves. No Joran laughs and asks her why?

Natalee responds that her parents have a plantation and the people who work there are black guys. To her all blacks are slaves.

Joran does not know if the Kalpoes heard this or not.

translation of Joran's book at BFN -
Quote
P 334

Joran says: "Natalee did use cocaine that week. She had it in her possession and offered it twice to a peer, which was shown in Peter R. de Vries’ broadcast about the case."

Also that week there were many boats close to shore because of the Soul Beach Music Festival. Maybe somebody saw from a boat that she was alone on the beach, took her on a boat, raped her, killed her and threw the body overboard at sea.

Joran says that it's also not impossible Natalee was kidnapped to be a sex slave in South America. But Joran says if that had happened he thinks she would have been murdered because all the publicity made her too much of a risk to her kidnappers.

CHAPTER 11 Breakthrough by Best Friend Freddy - from BFN
Quote
P153

The girl said that if the Kalpoe brothers would had lived in her city, they would have been slaves. After this they drove to the hotel. When the girl opened the door of the car she fell on the ground. Joran wanted to help her, but she pushed him away.

Deepak Kalpoe Statement of June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
To your question whether I can make detailed statements about the conversations that were happening while we were driving this route, I can say the following. I did hear some things. I heard the girl say something about sharks and "Lighthouse". The comment she made about the videoclip. Joran had told me two days later that the girl had asked him whether me and my brother had been his slaves. The girl had told Joran that she was from Alabama, and that she didn't like people of dark colour and that they owned a farm and that the people working on their farm were all of dark colour.


Satish Kalpoe Statement June 11, 2005 - bfn
Quote
The music in the car was on so loud that we could not hear what the people in the back of the car were saying. During the drive I had at one point heard that the girl had said the word "hitler". I had turned down the music a little. I then heard the girl saying that she was related to "hitler" and that her mother was the sister of "hitler". I also heard the girl saying that she was from Alabama and that her parents owned a plantation there that had slaves working on the plantation. Joran had told me later that the girl had asked him if we were his slaves. But I had not heard that.


I believe KJ formally asked the US State Department if Beth was related to hitler... ::MonkeyEek::

Did Natalee's family employ black people?...Did they own a farm or plantation?...

No Lorain, of course not.  Natalee's Dad is an Insurance Agent & Mom  is a Speech Therapist or Pathologist, I believe. 

IMO, those lies above are just that to reflect negatively "in the homeland & in LieRuba", against the lovely Natalee &/or go put the message out there that Nazi's unite behind one another, one of them is in danger.  Any Nazi affiliation would be coming from the stoolscum side of things.  No doubt about that, who threw away an innocent life?  Not Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 10:57:18 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Hotshot on November 22, 2008, 10:58:11 PM


Quote
I posted that a few days ago SS/No response from anyone.I'm under the impression that they're are 4 witnesses and not just 2.Correct me if I'm wrong??
Keepthefaith you are not wrong. can't go any further then that. Until arrests happen, it can't be talked about. but you WILL know.



HotShot - what do you know that you aren't saying?  Please fill us in.
Well, you know I cant divulge that.  

Quote
Can Greta's info, Tim Miller's 3 new witnesses, Caps' story, AND Kermit's allegations ALL fit together??
This is a tough question to answer here. IT doesn't have anything to do with what Kermit is saying. it's not about any of the witnesses who have had lie detector tests either. but, what I would like to know is has Kermit tried to ever contact CAPS at all?  Kermit, is there anyway you can contact me?  Klaas has my email.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 22, 2008, 11:00:44 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dtkmcompare.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:05:08 PM


A new witness has emerged, authorities say, who can place van der Sloot and his father, Paulus van der Sloot, near a pond on the island at 4 a.m. on the day Holloway vanished.
The witness told authorities he saw a young man, wet from the chest down and wearing only one shoe, running along a road from the pond to a fast-food restaurant.
The witness said he saw the young man and an older man driving slowly down the road in a red Jeep about 10 minutes later. The pond was not among those searched in the early stages of the investigation, Mos said.
The elder van der Sloot has told police he was at home, asleep in bed until 7 a.m. on the night in question.
(maybe he was sleep-walking with his cell phone.....)
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh::
Duh, did the lightbulb just come on, have him explain why there are multiple contradictory statements which state otherwise. Lets see...Mr VanderSloot...you were sleeping, you made some calls, your ATM card was used twice, our court seems to think that you interacted twice with the girl twice based off of your latest compensation denial...How were you able to be in so many places at the same time in one night?...Perform so many tasks?...Care to explain...

The sad part, at this point, is that Aruba, behind closed doors, can write the ending to this script...
How could anyone even take them serious, at this point? 'Cause HansMos says so...What a joke...Maybe VanderStraaten and Jacobs will come out of retirement for the hardball interrogation session of Paulus...HAHA...My ribs hurt from laughing...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 22, 2008, 11:05:26 PM


Thanks Altruist...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 11:09:49 PM
Could be Papito:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Persist1.jpg)

I don't think DTKM:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/persist2.jpg)

I agree, Klaas, and thanks for the help for the photo-challenged.

Maybe Papito, but I don't that's DTKM.  Wonder who that guy is?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:13:26 PM
DON"T TRUST THIS YET
JUDGE RICK SMID SHIELDS MAIN SUSPECT FROM PROSECUTION

In a hearing on June 1, 2005 Dutch judge Rick Smid ruled there was sufficient evidence to keep Joran van der Sloot in detention for an additional 30 days. Then in a baffling move, he flies back to Curacao and faxes in a reversal of the ruling he’d made only a few hours earlier, freeing van der Sloot from jail. Within three days Joran van der Sloot was on an airplane for Holland, and to make sure van der Sloot would never face prosecution, the judges gave Joran and the Kalpoe brothers immunity from ever being questioned again about this case.___________________________________


What is this about immunity from being questioned again.  Was the second arrest last year just a performance?

Maybe it was Judge Ito? From the famous Brentwood murders?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:16:22 PM


Dompig also was on a tv show and went on and on about how the radar worked so well that night--they were able to account for every boat that night.


Funny how the radar system went down, cell phone records were hard to obtain, computer hard drives were altered...
Must have been a flood in Aruba during that evening...[/
color]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 11:23:07 PM
Like I said it is NOT DTKM.............LOL   ::MonkeyHaHa::

With the pics side by side, now I see it is not.  I concede, I was wrong.

Man, that is the first time today I have been wrong......  LOL

Wonder who that guy is.  Did he come on board with ALE???

Thanks for putting the pics together to prove me wrong.   I swear I am laughing at myself.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 11:23:14 PM
Could be Papito:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Persist1.jpg)

I don't think DTKM:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/persist2.jpg)

I agree, Klaas, and thanks for the help for the photo-challenged.

Maybe Papito, but I don't that's DTKM.  Wonder who that guy is?







2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 22, 2008, 11:23:55 PM


Yeah...all the toilets ran over at the same time...a flood of BS for sure... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 22, 2008, 11:24:37 PM
Kermit: email please.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 11:27:42 PM
Hmmm>>>> that's right I forgot about black bear guy.  You know, all the Persistence crew members on board with all the ALE!?!?!  How could the crew members stand to work so close to the ALE.  That had to be hard.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

They should have let Hans "der ASSHOLE" Moss dive.  Maybe he would still be down there.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:28:16 PM
Found a couple more of Papito to compare...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito3.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Papito.jpg)

Could the very first guy in the picture (the one with the NBC logo on him) be the same guy from someone's avatar. He forget his name(vocking?). If so, we know which side he is on...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Helen Back on November 22, 2008, 11:28:35 PM

2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.
[/quote]

I looked at those hunting photos, but I don't think they look like the same guy.  Besides, OE told us that guy came on board the Persistence with the Arubans.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 22, 2008, 11:30:30 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 22, 2008, 11:32:25 PM
2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

Well I will agree that I see a possibility of red shirt closely resembling Bucher but he may have just come onboard with ALE, he didn't necessarily have to board as a member of the Persistence.  He is active with one of Silvetti's company's but that doesn't necessarily mean that Kyle would have met him or known of him.  Bucher is an accountant but definitely was an experienced dive operations person as well from the description of him on the website & hey he may have very well worked along side Detke in the early years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 11:32:33 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?

Don't know.  Good question.  Who took them and WHEN?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 11:32:46 PM

2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

I looked at those hunting photos, but I don't think they look like the same guy.  Besides, OE told us that guy came on board the Persistence with the Arubans.

A guy wearing the same hat with a striped shirt is in a different Persistence picture that wasn't taken whit ALE.  Sure looks like the same guy in red and stripes.


[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:32:56 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?

Kermit or CAPS
 ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe SHANGO or SIMIAN
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 11:34:48 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?

Screenshots from the Dateline video.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 11:35:48 PM
2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

Well I will agree that I see a possibility of red shirt closely resembling Bucher but he may have just come onboard with ALE, he didn't necessarily have to board as a member of the Persistence.  He is active with one of Silvetti's company's but that doesn't necessarily mean that Kyle would have met him or known of him.  Bucher is an accountant but definitely was an experienced dive operations person as well from the description of him on the website & hey he may have very well worked along side Detke in the early years.

Altruist (may I call you Al) you just rang a bell.  Do you remember Kermit's post saying that you didn't have to be an accountant to know how a business is run?   May be nothing, just wondering if he was referring to Bucher.  He was talking about the corruption, coverup, and follow the money when he made the statement.

Dunno know.... just thinking out loud.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:37:30 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?

Kermit or CAPS
 ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe SHANGO or SIMIAN
 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Hans Mos is probably thinking...
"How in the hell did they figure out where to search"
"What body of water are we in...Shits Creek? Because I don't have a paddle"
 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 11:37:48 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?

Kermit or CAPS
 ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe SHANGO or SIMIAN
 ::MonkeyLaugh::
::MonkeyHaHa::

Okay, I confess I took them.     

 ::MonkeyTongue::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 22, 2008, 11:38:58 PM
Ok, so I am searching through police pics looking for Groucho.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho3.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 22, 2008, 11:41:45 PM
VMS, I DO BELIEVE YOU HAVE MATCHED GROUCHO TO HIS PIC!!!!   


 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:43:45 PM
VMS, I DO BELIEVE YOU HAVE MATCHED GROUCHO TO HIS PIC!!!!   


 ::MonkeyDance::

A definite match. I agree !!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 22, 2008, 11:45:33 PM
Any possibility that Vocking was present, as I suggested in my post?
(At lower left corner of pic)

Or am I seeing things???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 22, 2008, 11:47:37 PM
The other pictures were taken off the News Video clip posted last page, showing MOS On the boat checking out the fish trap on the computer screen prior to divers going down to the trap..
Is  that when they rigged a deal between themselves to pull a Con on the boat crew ?
All of the other people are Big Cheeses too.
 Did others go down before ?  I do not know.. I am not guessing on that one..




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 22, 2008, 11:48:30 PM
Any possibility that Vocking was present, as I suggested in my post?
(At lower left corner of pic)

Or am I seeing things???

If it's the one I think you're talking about (back of head only), I'm pretty sure that's Tim Miller.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 22, 2008, 11:54:51 PM
Think I found it.  First visual, on trap December 24.  Mos and crew on board on Christmas.  Joint dive  performed December 30.  Did anyone dive between the 24th and 30th?  Would we know?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


Go to this link and scroll down and on the right side you will see a video with Tim Miller..
That is the video that shows these pictures .. the people and how they act.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 22, 2008, 11:58:16 PM
A direct link to the video..
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23302471#23302471


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 22, 2008, 11:59:45 PM
Ok, so I am searching through police pics looking for Groucho.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho3.jpg)




Now that looks more like the guy in the green shirt.  Is the Papito?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 12:00:55 AM
Altruist (may I call you Al) you just rang a bell.  Do you remember Kermit's post saying that you didn't have to be an accountant to know how a business is run?   May be nothing, just wondering if he was referring to Bucher.  He was talking about the corruption, coverup, and follow the money when he made the statement.

Dunno know.... just thinking out loud.

Al is fine by me.  It is a possibility but I was just looking at the face thinking about aging factors to consider when comparing the website to the bear photo to the cabin photo.  Just think that is possible, but of course if we could get positive id from someone who knows that would be great.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 12:01:50 AM
DTKM?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DTKM.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 12:02:34 AM
In one of Groucho's movie roles he played a detective named J. Cheever Loophole.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 12:03:37 AM
Ok, so I am searching through police pics looking for Groucho.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho3.jpg)
Now that looks more like the guy in the green shirt.  Is the Papito?

It looks like an updated version, doesn't it?  I think so, would feel more confident without the sunglasses.

In your searching, don't forget about the human bulldog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 12:04:39 AM
Ok, so I am searching through police pics looking for Groucho.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho3.jpg)




Now that looks more like the guy in the green shirt.  Is the Papito?

No, it isn't Papito. It doesn't help much, I don't know who he is.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 12:09:27 AM
DTKM?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DTKM.jpg)

well maybe if he jumped into a vat of black dye & constantly rotated for hours, don't think I've ever seen that drastic a change accomplished through tanning naturally or with a booth, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 12:13:03 AM
Ok, so I am searching through police pics looking for Groucho.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho3.jpg)




Now that looks more like the guy in the green shirt.  Is the Papito?

No, it isn't Papito. It doesn't help much, I don't know who he is.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/




The hairline and mustache are the same as green shirt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:13:44 AM
DTKM?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DTKM.jpg)

I think so!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:14:42 AM
DTKM?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DTKM.jpg)

I think so!  ::MonkeyCool::

Now find the bulldog!!!!!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 12:15:20 AM
Has any Monkey researched,and or came up with companies that own boats with the capabilities to drop a cage like the one in the dive????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:19:02 AM




Quote
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Persistence/Ron1.jpg)

What do you think?  Maybe red shirt?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 12:25:21 AM
DTKM?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DTKM.jpg)

I think so!  ::MonkeyCool::

Now find the bulldog!!!!!   ::MonkeyWink::

Ok, I'm looking.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 12:36:31 AM
Has any Monkey researched,and or came up with companies that own boats with the capabilities to drop a cage like the one in the dive????

Not that I know of.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:39:48 AM
Has any Monkey researched,and or came up with companies that own boats with the capabilities to drop a cage like the one in the dive????

IIRC when it was discussed before, locals wouldn't use a trap that large.  Possibilities of who might were mentioned but I can't remember who.  sorry....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 12:45:51 AM
Has any Monkey researched,and or came up with companies that own boats with the capabilities to drop a cage like the one in the dive????

Not that I know of.

Thanx Altruist...Just trying to understand who has the greatest understanding of the waters off of Aruba as well as the shipping lanes,as well as times.Not that it matters just thinking...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 01:02:29 AM
well those large traps from what I have seen on "Deadliest Catch" are used by way offshore fisherman, crabs & some fish as I think back on it, the boats are pretty large & have the needed equipment.  Now I guess that a drug post office would be possible, quite a bit of cocaine could probably be stored but not the kind of large shipments that I think big time drug runners would be involved in, then it seems kinda like too small.  Maybe for local dealing operations that size trap would be applicable, seems like a safe place to store it as well of course I don't really think LieRuba cares about keeping drugs of the place.

someone speculated that maybe for growing fish but I have seen a very different method used for that utilizing very large nets & that is done close to shore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 01:04:52 AM
Could be Papito:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Persist1.jpg)

I don't think DTKM:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/persist2.jpg)

I agree, Klaas, and thanks for the help for the photo-challenged.

Maybe Papito, but I don't that's DTKM.  Wonder who that guy is?







2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

No, not true.  AZSunny asked if it could be Bucher, and I responded that I did not think it was him.  I did so when posting pics I had found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 01:06:24 AM
Do we have this pic of Deepak's car?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DeepaksCar-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 01:16:34 AM
Could be Papito:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Persist1.jpg)

I don't think DTKM:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/persist2.jpg)

I agree, Klaas, and thanks for the help for the photo-challenged.

Maybe Papito, but I don't that's DTKM.  Wonder who that guy is?







2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

No, not true.  AZSunny asked if it could be Bucher, and I responded that I did not think it was him.  I did so when posting pics I had found.

Please go back to the last thread and revisit the posts.  I found an alternate picture of Mr.Bucher and posted it.  I also said twice that I did not think the red shirted man was him.     ::MonkeyNoNo::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551561#msg551561


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 01:18:35 AM
Do we have this pic of Deepak's car?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DeepaksCar-1.jpg)

That's a good picture it certainly was NOT the car taken into custody to be processed by ALE.  That one did NOT have tinted windows & the hub caps only had five spokes not the six seen in the above photo.  LieRuba is such a disgrace, this all should have been solved within 30 days.  What a bunch of cowardly criminals, can't wait til they have to face the music, the enabler's of the slootscum's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Altruist on November 23, 2008, 01:25:12 AM
Imagine the family members of these cowardly criminals, they can't even change their names & easily relocate to restart their lives.  Stuck on devils island with the SHAME bestowed upon them by their own family members, willingly putting them at risk.  I can not even imagine.

But then again the vanderstoolscums have no shame, they pitter about at their book clubs & cocktail parties & their "peers" treat them no differently, maybe all the other families will be able to take the same position.  Naw, I doubt it cuz when this comes down have a feeling that things will never be the same & decent people may very well take over as to date they have been cowering in fear of those in power, hopefully future elections will bring the decent people some real hope & aspirations worth achieving for their people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 02:25:50 AM
http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3162&Itemid=1

Papiamentu Translation

productor of declaration of policy mericano on caso holloway is deny of entrega tape at police at aruba

saturday, 22 november 2008

oranjestad – one productor of one magazine sensacionalista mericano can is the causante of the interest repentino again on the caso natalee holloway. according vocero of ministerio publico, the week here they owing to ricibi one avalancha of call again dirigi on the caso of investigacion of natalee holloway. all basa on supuesto informacion ‘nobo’ cu have to owing to origina for of aruba y cu is causante of the ‘problema’. according ministerio publico cu owing to saca one comunicado dirigi at prensa mericano yesterday, they're show cu is for of july of the year here cu they owing to wordo acerca for one declaration of policy of television sensacionalista, on one supuesto video new of sospechoso principal of the caso here, joran vd sloot, discutiendo the caso holloway at thailand. was one productor of the declaration of policy here did take contacto cu ministerio publico at aruba indicando cu the have the tape y owing to comparti the contenido of the tape. self instant ministerio publico owing to let know cu the informacion there not have none valor because; proof for her caso here the instant here. ministerio publico is follow show cu result of they investigacion do not show none aid for cu the ‘prueba nobo’ here. owing to haci peticion for her productor send one copia of the tape here for they see this y analis’e. the anfitrion of the declaration of policy niether never owing to arrive aruba according ministerio publico. the oferta for show the tape once more, owing to wordo ripiti 10 day again, by one agent of ministerio publico at merca. in one combersacion personal among the anfitrion of the declaration of policy sensacionalista y the fiscal, owing to revoca the oferta here, debi at the another compromisonan comercial cu the anfitrion had at merca. thing owing to stay is one sugerencia of ‘tuma or laga’ in one attempt for come across at miami in end of week. but the anfitrion do not dispuesto for provee the tape at police. do not conoci if in the caso here is deal of the same tape cu cual conocido anfitrion greta van susteren is refiriendo at dje. come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 23, 2008, 03:09:02 AM
Imagine the family members of these cowardly criminals, they can't even change their names & easily relocate to restart their lives.  Stuck on devils island with the SHAME bestowed upon them by their own family members, willingly putting them at risk.  I can not even imagine.

But then again the vanderstoolscums have no shame, they pitter about at their book clubs & cocktail parties & their "peers" treat them no differently, maybe all the other families will be able to take the same position.  Naw, I doubt it cuz when this comes down have a feeling that things will never be the same & decent people may very well take over as to date they have been cowering in fear of those in power, hopefully future elections will bring the decent people some real hope & aspirations worth achieving for their people.
Jossy said it himself the other night: 'The people of Aruba are now "indifferent".'


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 03:28:01 AM
Imagine the family members of these cowardly criminals, they can't even change their names & easily relocate to restart their lives.  Stuck on devils island with the SHAME bestowed upon them by their own family members, willingly putting them at risk.  I can not even imagine.

But then again the vanderstoolscums have no shame, they pitter about at their book clubs & cocktail parties & their "peers" treat them no differently, maybe all the other families will be able to take the same position.  Naw, I doubt it cuz when this comes down have a feeling that things will never be the same & decent people may very well take over as to date they have been cowering in fear of those in power, hopefully future elections will bring the decent people some real hope & aspirations worth achieving for their people.
Jossy said it himself the other night: 'The people of Aruba are now "indifferent".'
I need to go back and read the transcript again, I thought he was talking about Mos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 03:36:58 AM
Greta's got them upset alright, three pages in Bondia.  Too tired to type and get translated tonight, maybe tomorrow.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/11222008Bondia10aNatalee-1.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/11222008Bondia18aJVDS-1.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/11222008Bondia19aJVDS-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 03:43:07 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

Justice for Natalee!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 06:24:14 AM
Was Mackin McKinney - Natalee’s Aruba Roommate  ?
Sunday, April 6, 2008

Natalee Holloway

We had just had celebrated our big high school graduation and were scheduled to go to Aruba the next morning. There were one hundred and twenty five of our best friends going down to celebrate after finally graduating from Mountain Brook High School. A group of us had spent the night at my house the so that we could get up early and all head to the airport together. We talked about all the fun things we wanted to do and how excited we all were, as we were all completely oblivious to what was about to happen. I never would have guessed that this would be the last time that Natalee would be in my house with all of us.

Our flight was scheduled to leave at seven in the morning so we had to get up very early. None of us really had slept the night before because we were all too excited. We finally arrived in Aruba and were greeted by buses that were going to take us to our resort. It was an all inclusive hotel that had tons of places to eat and bars on the property. We had to decide who was going to be in our rooms before we arrived and there was a door that opened to the next room to combine them. Natalee and I shared a room with two other girls along with four more of our friends in the next room. Everyone was so excited that we immediately put on our bathing suits and headed to the pool. The first night everyone decided to stay at the hotel and just go to the bars and the casinos. We were having a ball and everyone was so laid back and care free.

As our trip was coming to a close on our last night everyone decided that we were going to ride the bus into town and go to the hot spot Carlos and Charlies. We were scheduled to go out on a day cruise on a sailboat for the day and then were going to go home and eat dinner before we headed out for our big night on the town. The sailboat was amazing and there was a bar on the boat so all of us were laying out on the front of the boat getting sun and enjoying our tropical drinks. Natalee and all of us began to talk about these guys that we had met in the casino the night before and how they had said that they were going to go to Carlos and Charlies also. None of us really had wanted to be around them, but they had come to our hotel and started conversation with all of us.

We got in from the day out on the water and ran to our rooms to shower and get ready for dinner and a crazy last night in Aruba. After enjoying a nice dinner at the hotel, all of us loaded up onto the buses and headed into town. The bar was so crowded and everyone began drinking and dancing. The bar tenders were getting people on stage to compete in contest and of course all of our friends were on stage. It began getting late and the bar was closing so all of us were forced outside into the street. Most of the group was together, but none of us could find Natalee. The bar was so crazy when everyone was leaving that there was no trying to find someone cause everyone was pushing and shoving and of course had lots to drink. Everyone began cramming into cabs and headed back to the hotel. There was another group that had gone to another bar so most of us figured Natalee had gone with them. Everyone was exhausted and ready to go to bed so when we got back to the hotel we fell right to sleep.

We woke up the next morning to find that Natalee was not in our room and figured that she had just stayed in another room. Natalee was never the type to be late and would never miss something like a flight home. It was getting close to the time we were supposed to leave for the airport and there was still no sign of Natalee. Me and some of my friends began to cry and started to seriously worry about Natalee. One of our teachers that was on the trip stayed behind and called Natalee's parents and told them to head down to Aruba immediately that Natalee didn't return home from the bar the night before. All of us were freaking out and didn't know what to do. We had tried to stay behind with our teacher but they wouldn't let us.

The night we got home everyone came over to my house to spend the night and we had heard that there was to be an announcement on the news stating that Natalee Holloway was missing on a graduation trip and hadn't returned home from Aruba. All of us were in shock and had a really hard time dealing with everything that was going on. We didn't know what to do and had no clue that our lives were about to change. One of our best friends had gone missing and we didn't know if she was dead or alive.

Mackin McKinney Blog (Natalee's Friend

http://mackinmckinney.blogspot.com/2008/04/natalee-holloway.html



thanks Blonde > i know that blog and this letter  is the dutch tread here  ::MonkeyWink::

For me is this important :  None of us really had wanted to be around them, but they had come to our hotel and started conversation with all of us .

And she said they had come to our hotel  > was that outside the hotel ,at the bar, were they hanging around a bit  ?
Was that the only time "they" were there ?
And who are "they"?
And she said :None of us really had wanted to be around them> why was that ? there must be a reason to say that .




i asked if they were hanging around the HI  because i found this :

on a Aruba forum :

Posted on: 7:01 am, June 06, 2005  Save
***** RECAP *********** RECAP ********** (with comments)

1:30 a.m. - 3 guys drive away with Natalee and she disappears. (The time is verified by the girls that were with Natalee)
We find out that the locals refer to them as "THE drug dealers" of the area.(The media is so kind to call them students. Especially since they are NOT in school and are working on the island.)
We find out that 2 of the 3 "persons of interest" have fathers who are politically tied to the island. (one a judge and one a lawyer)
We find out that at 2:00 the 3 "persons of interest" claim to have merely dropped Natalee off at the H.I. and claim she just disappeared.(Uh .. they didnt walk her to the door? What guy drops an attractive girl off in the parking lot and drives away?)
We find out that no cameras at the H.I. record the 3 "persons of interest" dropping her off. Also, none of the vacationers of the entire H.I. complex saw her that evening. Many of the people that know Natalee, are awake and scattered about the resort most of the early morning. None of them see her or the 3 guys.(How strange.)

We find out that dad, the Judge, is representing the 3 in question.

We find out that the 3 "persons of interest" claim to have gone to a beach on the North Tip of the island and then dropped Natalee off at 2:00 at the H.I.(Story changes and amazingly they did all of this in just 30 minutes. The drive from the bar to the Lighthouse is probably 15 minutes. So, if they drive by without stopping they could get to the H.I. in just enough time to drop her off - in the street right in front of the HI?)

We find out that dad, the Judge, is upset the media knows about the 3 in question and "removes" some of the law enforcement in charge.(Powerful man he must be. The power of the dark side is strong.)
FBI gets involved and local authorities are under extreme pressure from both sides now.

We find out from a local Aruban Paper (A.M. Digital - locals verified as credible source) that the 3 "persons of interest" claim to have taken her to the Lighthouse, had <relations> with her, and THEN dropped her off at 2:00--where the cameras couldn't see us.(Story changes for the 3rd time and even more amazingly, they have found a way to TIME TRAVEL. Lets face it, you can't drive that fast let alone <anything else>. They must have dropped her off (way out of camera range) some time later than 2:00)
Here is the link - http://www.arubaam.com/~victor/am04jun05.pdf
The authorities investigate the Allegro. (dad the Judge may have ordered a coverup at this point.)
We find out something is sent to a Holland Lab and we should hold our breath for 24 hours. (I got a headache from this one.)The authorities make an arrest of 2 men. (the coverup may be continuing.)
The authorities find a green shack and a matress that seem to not help this case.
We wait as the Island will conduct a search with up to 10,000 people involved.
I probably missed some but thats most of it.
------------------------------------------------------------
I think we have 3 guys that need to talk and dad the Judge says no.
I may be wrong but seems like these 2 guys are being used to take the blame. After all, I have seen their pictures in the news already. Where are the pictures of those 3 that claim to have had <relations> with her and then dropped her off in the parking lot or in the street or where there are no cameras ? If they were sooo close (i.e. having relations), then why leave her in the parking lot the night before she leaves??
One thing is for sure -- these 3 persons of interest are liars. What did they put in her drink? I think we all know that scenario and how much easier it is with people NEW to the bar scene.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This info may not be perfect but we are doing better on this thread than any NewsCast is doing.
The comments might be harsh but they are only based on those facts at this time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: blah on November 23, 2008, 07:39:41 AM
the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only.
<snip>
the FBI gave them to Dave H

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047



Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -
« Reply #740 on: March 18, 2008, 12:22:38 PM »
After the visual inspection on 30-Dec, the initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap. 
<snip>
The talks continued after Jan-7th when the samples were collected.

<snip>
On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.
snip>
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.
 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321


The trap contents weren't sampled until the 7th of January.  Neither Tim Miller, Tim Trahan, or Dateline were on board during this time. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366312#msg366312


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 04:21:47 PM »

We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857

Quote from: private eye on March 19, 2008, 02:54:38 PM
 I am curious what the circumstances were surrounding his leave from the boat he described during which the Dutch ship came close to the trap location.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366826#msg366826

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366289#msg366289
Human remains were found


the items found inside the trap
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366281#msg366281



I inquired about the Dutch coast guard being on site
 "we do not have dive capability
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366325#msg366325

Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap
<snip>
Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047





WOW, I have not read here in a long time and am very surprised by what people are now saying.  Are you saying that the crew of the persistance is involved in the coverup????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 08:31:07 AM

Blah…Hi…differing opinions on this, and will let some that have followed it more closely fill you in. Blonde has a thread started.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0


Johan…Relax…Take the day off…Haven’t you been reading the last week or so? It is all coming together.  No need to stumble around in the dark any longer. Just be patient. In due time we will all know!

Heck…Maybe some new books will be forthcoming to enlighten us. Not sure how Royalties work, but maybe there would be enough made to take a cruise or buy a Luxury car…

Have a great Day Everyone!…Wow…I can watch Football, go shopping, delete all the files I won’t be needing, clean out all my email accounts …the possibilities are endless!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 08:47:29 AM
DTKM?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DTKM.jpg)

I think so!  ::MonkeyCool::

Now find the bulldog!!!!!   ::MonkeyWink::

Ok, I'm looking.  ::MonkeyHaHa::




I hate to be a nay sayer, but red shirt is not DTKM.  The features aren't even the same and red shirt isn't wearing glasses.  DTKM would never have stood there while the group was being photographed.  He doesn't allow his picture to be taken.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 08:54:17 AM
Could be Papito:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Persist1.jpg)

I don't think DTKM:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/persist2.jpg)

I agree, Klaas, and thanks for the help for the photo-challenged.

Maybe Papito, but I don't that's DTKM.  Wonder who that guy is?







2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

No, not true.  AZSunny asked if it could be Bucher, and I responded that I did not think it was him.  I did so when posting pics I had found.




I'm sorry 2NJ.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 08:57:56 AM
Do we have this pic of Deepak's car?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DeepaksCar-1.jpg)

That's a good picture it certainly was NOT the car taken into custody to be processed by ALE.  That one did NOT have tinted windows & the hub caps only had five spokes not the six seen in the above photo.  LieRuba is such a disgrace, this all should have been solved within 30 days.  What a bunch of cowardly criminals, can't wait til they have to face the music, the enabler's of the slootscum's.





Touch base with Rob, Carpe, and Wreck.  They spent days comparing the Hondas.  I think it's all back in Shango somewhere.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 09:11:54 AM
Good Evening Fellow Monkey Sleuths

Have we ever identified the guy in the red shirt?  He came on board with ALE.  I was going to post this the other night and thought everyone would think I was crazy.... and I may be.... but he looks like Frans Deutkom (sp?).
Quote from: oceanexploration on November 20,2008 at 04:00:07 PM
BTW, this is certainly NOT John Silvetti.  I do not know this man.  He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.new#new



Blonde, our pic guru, I was looking through the thread where you posted the pictures and the one of Deutkom sorta running/walking fast in suit and tie and his hair looks kinda wild?!?  Do you remember it?  Could you bring it over. 
Can you give me a link please, I post a lot of pictures

I just want everyone to compare the two.  Put a cap on Deutkom and see what you think.

 ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 09:28:26 AM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 09:32:20 AM

Do we know for certain where Urine is right now?  Is he still in Thailand?

If Greta, Jossy, or someone breaks information that can't be refuted, how will Urine get back to Aruba? We checked last year and the treaty says that it's voluntary for Thailand to extradiate someone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 09:49:19 AM
the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only.
<snip>
the FBI gave them to Dave H

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047

....snip for brevity.........

On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.
snip>
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.[/b] 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321


The trap contents weren't sampled until the 7th of January.  Neither Tim Miller, Tim Trahan, or Dateline were on board during this time. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366312#msg366312


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 04:21:47 PM »

We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366289#msg366289
Human remains were found


the items found inside the trap
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366281#msg366281



Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap
<snip>
Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047



Kermit,

This question may have been answered before but would you, or anyone who knows the facts, know why the stills of the trap that were posted at great objection by Kyle appear to have been taken from WITHIN the trap itself, and not thru the mesh as if the photographer were on the outside looking in? THis is something that has bugged me since Feb. Those shots look remarkably clear and yet still grainy. But I don't see any echo or shadow of the mesh..... Am I mistaken?

I just rewatched the MSNBC Dateline footage of the official dive and am left scratching my head over this:

If the trap itself is 90' below the surface, why did the divers have so little time left in their tanks to explore? How long does it take to dive 90' and how much oxygen do the tanks hold? Why didn't the divers open the cage or at least attempt to open it and allow the cameraman who was filming THEM to film within the cage? Or did they?

If the trap findings made Trahan give the thumbs down sign, why did the Authorities bother to RETURN for recovering and sampling ANYTHING and then give results for NOTHING? I assume the divers didn't recover a single thing while on the Persistance that key day?

Actually my real wonderment is in the time that lagged between the 30 Dec and the return with the DATELINE crew...... why didn't the Persistance divers not just jump in and enter the damned cage when they found it?REALLY!!!!! Who of us given these circumstances and knowing diving experience and money spent would wait another MINUTE before throwing themselves into the water and go right down there right then and there? ::MonkeyNoNo:: THEY ALL KNEW that doing it "by the book" was getting the Holloways absolutely nowhere!

Anyone know these answers?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 09:54:43 AM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)
His moustache appears longer , thicker and darker than Butterfly's as well. Greenshirt looks like that fellow in the three stills carrying some briefcase walking out of a buiding and towards a car. BTW, the man in uniform behind him at the doorway sort of looks like "bulldog".... Hard to tell, he's so blocked in both shots.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 09:55:10 AM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/dtkmcompare.jpg)
I gave him a hair cut and cloned on the cap thoughts please. ::MonkeyHaHa::
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Aruba%20Law%20E/dtkmcompare.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 10:00:57 AM
I see another photograph from the Persistence that might also show red shirt.   The second photo has a shirt with stripes, but the baseball cap looks like it's the same.  I don't understand why Kyle can't be more helpful with these people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:01:17 AM

2Nj thinks red shirt is Bucher, a member of the Persistence crew.  He has the same baseball cap on in another Persistence picture where he is wearing a striped shirt.  Go back several pages to the picture of the guy with a dead bear.

I looked at those hunting photos, but I don't think they look like the same guy.  Besides, OE told us that guy came on board the Persistence with the Arubans.[/quote]

Can't be Kyle said he did not know him

Quote from: oceanexploration on November 20,2008 at 04:00:07 PM
BTW, this is certainly NOT John Silvetti.  I do not know this man.  He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.new#new





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:05:18 AM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Did Kyle take these pictures?  If not, do we know who did?




You have to go to dateline and take screen shots,or their pictures .

Blonde,
I do not know who that man is either.  A group of Arubans came on board the Persistence (along with Mos and Richardson) who I had never seen.  I wasn't introduced. Everyone in those pictures are standing around me (seated).  The man you're calling the Bulldog stood behind me to my left.  Most of their english was pretty poor IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.700


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 10:06:37 AM
Green shirt looks like he has a lighter complexion that the butterfly has.

LOL, don't think you can go by that, the lighting in that cabin is poor, wonder if Klaas or Blonde can lighten it up & green shirt may have been staying out of the sun, ya know skin cancer can happen to darker complexions as well, there actually could be any number of reasons for that.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)
His moustache appears longer , thicker and darker than Butterfly's as well. Greenshirt looks like that fellow in the three stills carrying some briefcase walking out of a buiding and towards a car. BTW, the man in uniform behind him at the doorway sort of looks like "bulldog".... Hard to tell, he's so blocked in both shots.....

Hi teacat,

Thanks for responding to my question about the other guy in uniform. Paul Seute is who came to my mind but... :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 23, 2008, 10:08:56 AM
The only ones I recognize now are Mos and Dolph.  Don't think green shirt is Papito.  Does Bulldog have a camera around his neck?  Why do the Arubans have "visitor" name tags?  I would think the crew would recognize a non-crew member.   ::MonkeyConfused::

Was this whole scene just a photo op?

Did anyone dive between Christmas Eve and Dec. 30th?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:09:42 AM
What do you think he's thinking here.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/hmos4.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:13:02 AM
I gotta ask this (and I apologize if it seems I beat dead horses....) I have just read thru Kyle's Log that Blonde hs been kind enough to compile and post here (http://here) oops.... did that wrong.... (clean up on aisle two please!) here: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?PHPSESSID=3baacff0e65b5b53798ae4813b7da891&topic=4145.0 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?PHPSESSID=3baacff0e65b5b53798ae4813b7da891&topic=4145.0)
and I have to ask: why no mention in his entire Log (!) of Dateline being on board? Filming over shoulders? Filming the Holloways and chasing down phantom Marcos in Honduras?

Kyle, if you're out there..... I mean NO disrespect to you or the crew of the Persistance..... but why no mention or did I overlook it?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on November 23, 2008, 10:15:00 AM
well those large traps from what I have seen on "Deadliest Catch" are used by way offshore fisherman, crabs & some fish as I think back on it, the boats are pretty large & have the needed equipment.  Now I guess that a drug post office would be possible, quite a bit of cocaine could probably be stored but not the kind of large shipments that I think big time drug runners would be involved in, then it seems kinda like too small.  Maybe for local dealing operations that size trap would be applicable, seems like a safe place to store it as well of course I don't really think LieRuba cares about keeping drugs of the place.

someone speculated that maybe for growing fish but I have seen a very different method used for that utilizing very large nets & that is done close to shore.

I don't know why a drug operation would use a trap and let it loose in the ocean.  In my mind, it would be vulnerable to drift nets, or drifting on it's own.  How would anyone find it?

I think it would be an odd way to do business.  

What I do remember is at least one or more holes that some suggest Natalee was stored in for maybe a day.  Those, IIRC, were the kind used for drug dealing.  Drug dealers would arrive and drop their stuff in the hole, cover, and take off.  The hole was the same all the time.  Easy to find if you knew where it was.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 10:17:03 AM
the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only.
<snip>
the FBI gave them to Dave H

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047

....snip for brevity.........

On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.
snip>
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.[/b] 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321


The trap contents weren't sampled until the 7th of January.  Neither Tim Miller, Tim Trahan, or Dateline were on board during this time. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366312#msg366312


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 04:21:47 PM »

We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366289#msg366289
Human remains were found


the items found inside the trap
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366281#msg366281



Video 3:  Jan 7th - ROV monitoring diver tactile inspection of the trap with sampling of items inside and outside of trap
<snip>
Neither Tim Miller nor the media were on board.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047



Kermit,

This question may have been answered before but would you, or anyone who knows the facts, know why the stills of the trap that were posted at great objection by Kyle appear to have been taken from WITHIN the trap itself, and not thru the mesh as if the photographer were on the outside looking in? THis is something that has bugged me since Feb. Those shots look remarkably clear and yet still grainy. But I don't see any echo or shadow of the mesh..... Am I mistaken?

I just rewatched the MSNBC Dateline footage of the official dive and am left scratching my head over this:

If the trap itself is 90' below the surface, why did the divers have so little time left in their tanks to explore? How long does it take to dive 90' and how much oxygen do the tanks hold? Why didn't the divers open the cage or at least attempt to open it and allow the cameraman who was filming THEM to film within the cage? Or did they?

If the trap findings made Trahan give the thumbs down sign, why did the Authorities bother to RETURN for recovering and sampling ANYTHING and then give results for NOTHING? I assume the divers didn't recover a single thing while on the Persistance that key day?

Actually my real wonderment is in the time that lagged between the 30 Dec and the return with the DATELINE crew...... why didn't the Persistance divers not just jump in and enter the damned cage when they found it?REALLY!!!!! Who of us given these circumstances and knowing diving experience and money spent would wait another MINUTE before throwing themselves into the water and go right down there right then and there? ::MonkeyNoNo:: THEY ALL KNEW that doing it "by the book" was getting the Holloways absolutely nowhere!

Anyone know these answers?

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:20:02 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/profile.jpg)
I turned him



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 10:24:45 AM
The only ones I recognize now are Mos and Dolph.  Don't think green shirt is Papito.  Does Bulldog have a camera around his neck?  Why do the Arubans have "visitor" name tags?  I would think the crew would recognize a non-crew member.   ::MonkeyConfused::

Was this whole scene just a photo op?

Did anyone dive between Christmas Eve and Dec. 30th?

I thought at first that bulldog had the camera, but if you watch the video...I think he's standing BESIDE the guy with the camera.

I don't think they ever dove on the site until Dec 29th, Mos and the rest on board on the 30th.  That is what I gathered from the video.  But of course we could have been misled.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:25:39 AM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:27:22 AM
What do you think he's thinking here.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/hmos4.jpg)
"oh S***! oh S***! oh S***!"?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 10:28:52 AM
The only ones I recognize now are Mos and Dolph.  Don't think green shirt is Papito.  Does Bulldog have a camera around his neck?  Why do the Arubans have "visitor" name tags?  I would think the crew would recognize a non-crew member.   ::MonkeyConfused::

Was this whole scene just a photo op?

Did anyone dive between Christmas Eve and Dec. 30th?

I thought at first that bulldog had the camera, but if you watch the video...I think he's standing BESIDE the guy with the camera.

I don't think they ever dove on the site until Dec 29th, Mos and the rest on board on the 30th.  That is what I gathered from the video.  But of course we could have been misled.

sorry, forgot to put a link to the video: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23302471#23302471


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:29:30 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/profile.jpg)
I turned him


Ooh! Thank you! Same forehead shape, huh?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:30:10 AM
Any possibility that Vocking was present, as I suggested in my post?
(At lower left corner of pic)

Or am I seeing things???
Ben Vocking
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Aruba%20Law%20E/KINGBenVocking.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 10:33:04 AM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 10:36:05 AM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?



Positioning of the ROV and control of the camera would be my guess but I know nothing...just thinking Titanic footage...:lol:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:36:21 AM
Ok, so I am searching through police pics looking for Groucho.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho2.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/groucho3.jpg)

VMS are you saying this is or is not Papito


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 10:38:58 AM
Kyle's statement...

I got off the boat for 4 nights from the 10-14th of Jan for some much needed R&R.  I was in close communication with the boat and continued to post updates.  I didn't need to broadcast my presence on the island at the time.  I observed the vessel at or very near the location on the 11th and 12th for 42 and 45 minutes respectively.  I questioned the possibility of unknown diving ops taking place.  The talks about recovering the trap ceased around that time as well.  My concern was the trap was being cleaned up (legitimately or otherwise), but I have no evidence of this either way as we never revisited the site.



I was the one who discovered that the log and Kyle being on shore didn't match.  Kyle now says that he was posting the log from shore.  So, Kyle was leading us to believe that he was still on Persistence as he was describing the progress of the day.  How does Kyle know what took place while he was on shore?  It sounds to me like he wasn't getting a lot of information.  Is the Persistence log accurate or is it something that was created from shore?  Wouldn't the ship's log or diary indicate who the people were who came onboard with ALE?  Wasn't Kyle in charge of the log?  I am very confused about all of this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 10:39:57 AM
Blonde,

It is not Papito. Papito is in the same group of pics at that location that day. I posted the link, will have to find it again...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:40:57 AM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?


Ok. Now if we go to 2:49 on the Dateline show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kg231BJ-rk&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kg231BJ-rk&feature=related) you can see the cage and it looks wholy intact on top, assuming that is the "top" of the cage. Where does the door attach to this cage; on a side? from the top, anyone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 10:42:10 AM
Blonde,

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 10:48:19 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/profile.jpg)
I turned him
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Ooh! Thank you! Same forehead shape, huh?

Yes, and hairline looks the same, too, IMO!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:51:11 AM
Blonde,

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/
Cool! I Dled a photo of "butterfly" from this site, exiting a door and don't know how to attach it to this post. But apparently, the man with the briefcase who appears on the Persistance is at this same event and those photos are about 20 frames away from the first man. So clearly not the same person at all but BOTH OF THEM linked in some fashion with corpses!!!!
Great.... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:52:06 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/profile.jpg)
I turned him
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/grouchot.jpg)

Ooh! Thank you! Same forehead shape, huh?

Yes, and hairline looks the same, too, IMO!

Yeah, both men look like people on board the Persistance. Coincidence? hmmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: San on November 23, 2008, 10:54:00 AM
Blonde,

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Papito.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 10:56:11 AM
Blonde,

It is not Papito. Papito is in the same group of pics at that location that day. I posted the link, will have to find it again...
Ok then who is this other guy who looks like the guy on the boat


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 10:57:49 AM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?


Ok. Now if we go to 2:49 on the Dateline show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kg231BJ-rk&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kg231BJ-rk&feature=related) you can see the cage and it looks wholy intact on top, assuming that is the "top" of the cage. Where does the door attach to this cage; on a side? from the top, anyone?
I believe from the side, I found OE's post about it:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=40

56   Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -  on: March 19, 2008, 03:27:10 PM 
Quote
Quote from: ******* on March 19, 2008, 03:21:50 PM

Thanks! I was figuring about the same,but wasn't sure if it could have been 10 years or so.

Was that cage intact/closed when you viewed it? Just wondering if it was,because that would help keep everything in the cage that was originally placed there. Also it would keep out the large fish that live at that depth.

Response from oceanexploration

Quote
It's possible to have been 10 years or so.  I don't know for certain and don't have any way to readily test this. The trap was somewhat intact.  It's north side was in poor shape, with significant deterioration of it's northern panels.  The trap's doop is usually fastened to the outside of the trap.  It was laying inside the trap, as if pushed open. The contents sampled inside the trap were laying on top of the door.  The trap was found in 90 ft.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 10:58:56 AM
Blonde,

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Papito.jpg)
San THANK YOU!!! now... how did you do that: attach the phot to the post? I figured out how to attach a link...... I'm not completely useless, but close!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 11:01:01 AM

snip

I believe from the side, I found OE's post about it:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=40

56   Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -  on: March 19, 2008, 03:27:10 PM 
Quote
Quote from: ******* on March 19, 2008, 03:21:50 PM

Thanks! I was figuring about the same,but wasn't sure if it could have been 10 years or so.

Was that cage intact/closed when you viewed it? Just wondering if it was,because that would help keep everything in the cage that was originally placed there. Also it would keep out the large fish that live at that depth.

Response from oceanexploration

Quote
It's possible to have been 10 years or so.  I don't know for certain and don't have any way to readily test this. The trap was somewhat intact.  It's north side was in poor shape, with significant deterioration of it's northern panels.  The trap's doop is usually fastened to the outside of the trap.  It was laying inside the trap, as if pushed open. The contents sampled inside the trap were laying on top of the door.  The trap was found in 90 ft.


Ah so!!! ok now I understand you clearer. Thank you!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 11:02:21 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 11:09:54 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Could "Moustache" work as an Aruban Coroner?

How can so many people be on a US flagged vessel and we don't know of a manifest?

*n. 1. A list of cargo or passengers carried on a ship or plane. Detailed statement of the contents put on a ship or other vehicle. A copy of the manifest is put in a safe place so that the exact cargo is known, even in the event the vessel is destroyed. A copy of a ship's manifest is kept on board for cargo identification purposes in the event of a search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 11:15:08 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Could "Moustache" work as an Aruban Coroner?

How can so many people be on a US flagged vessel and we don't know of a manifest?

*n. 1. A list of cargo or passengers carried on a ship or plane. Detailed statement of the contents put on a ship or other vehicle. A copy of the manifest is put in a safe place so that the exact cargo is known, even in the event the vessel is destroyed. A copy of a ship's manifest is kept on board for cargo identification purposes in the event of a search.




The Persistence crew went so far as to give each ALE visitor a visitor's tag, but they didn't write their names down?  That I find really difficult to imagine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 11:17:41 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Could "Moustache" work as an Aruban Coroner?

How can so many people be on a US flagged vessel and we don't know of a manifest?

*n. 1. A list of cargo or passengers carried on a ship or plane. Detailed statement of the contents put on a ship or other vehicle. A copy of the manifest is put in a safe place so that the exact cargo is known, even in the event the vessel is destroyed. A copy of a ship's manifest is kept on board for cargo identification purposes in the event of a search.

The Persistence crew went so far as to give each ALE visitor a visitor's tag, but they didn't write their names down?  That I find really difficult to imagine.

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 11:21:24 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Could "Moustache" work as an Aruban Coroner?

How can so many people be on a US flagged vessel and we don't know of a manifest?

*n. 1. A list of cargo or passengers carried on a ship or plane. Detailed statement of the contents put on a ship or other vehicle. A copy of the manifest is put in a safe place so that the exact cargo is known, even in the event the vessel is destroyed. A copy of a ship's manifest is kept on board for cargo identification purposes in the event of a search.

The Persistence crew went so far as to give each ALE visitor a visitor's tag, but they didn't write their names down?  That I find really difficult to imagine.

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 




Kyle says he has no idea who they were.  Kyle was keeping the diary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 23, 2008, 11:24:24 AM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Does Bulldog have a camera around his neck?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 11:26:08 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Could "Moustache" work as an Aruban Coroner?

How can so many people be on a US flagged vessel and we don't know of a manifest?

*n. 1. A list of cargo or passengers carried on a ship or plane. Detailed statement of the contents put on a ship or other vehicle. A copy of the manifest is put in a safe place so that the exact cargo is known, even in the event the vessel is destroyed. A copy of a ship's manifest is kept on board for cargo identification purposes in the event of a search.

The Persistence crew went so far as to give each ALE visitor a visitor's tag, but they didn't write their names down?  That I find really difficult to imagine.

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 

Kyle says he has no idea who they were.  Kyle was keeping the diary.

By diary do you mean his log that was on his blog?  If so I think this would be completely separate from any visitor "log" that may have been kept on the boat.  Kyle may not have been responsible for that.  I would think that for security purposes the boat would be required to keep a log of non crew members that board.  It has been quite a while since the mission, and if Kyle knew some of the names then, he may not recall them now; or may not be at liberty to post them here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: San on November 23, 2008, 11:27:15 AM
Blonde,

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6426/8/

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Papito.jpg)
San THANK YOU!!! now... how did you do that: attach the phot to the post? I figured out how to attach a link...... I'm not completely useless, but close!

I have a program call PrintKey-Pro where I did a screen capture and then I saved the picture as a JPG and saved it to my photobucket.

Edited to add:  I copied the link from photobucket and pasted it in my post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 11:38:15 AM
?????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 11:39:11 AM

snipped

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 

Kyle says he has no idea who they were.  Kyle was keeping the diary.

By diary do you mean his log that was on his blog?  If so I think this would be completely separate from any visitor "log" that may have been kept on the boat.  Kyle may not have been responsible for that.  I would think that for security purposes the boat would be required to keep a log of non crew members that board.  It has been quite a while since the mission, and if Kyle knew some of the names then, he may not recall them now; or may not be at liberty to post them here.
[/quote]
From Kyle's posting:
Key Personnel: Bios coming soon! Please check back soon.

Louis Schaefer Jr. - Project Lead and Key Contributor

Tim Miller - Project Management -Founder of Texas Equusearch http://www.texasequusearch.org/

Tim Trahan - Underwater Expeditions - Project Management

John Silvetti - Project Lead and Key Contributor- Responsible for overall project planning and development. Owner of Marine Surveys, LLC . Providing the R/V Persistence for the search effort. http://silvettigroup.com/

Marc Broussard - Project Manager

Kent Bourg- Party Chief

Kyle Kingman - Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist

Dr. Rob Floyd - Marine Geologist /Archaeologist

Anthony Fontenot - Acoustic Positioning Technician
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 5:47 PM

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/11/mobilization.html

I don't see anyone listed as Clerk.... or Secretary. Project Manager, yes. Perhaps that is one responsible?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 11:40:54 AM
Whoops.. didn't quote block that last message correctly. sorry


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 23, 2008, 11:48:29 AM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/allthree.jpg)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/whoarethey.jpg)

Could "Moustache" work as an Aruban Coroner?

How can so many people be on a US flagged vessel and we don't know of a manifest?

*n. 1. A list of cargo or passengers carried on a ship or plane. Detailed statement of the contents put on a ship or other vehicle. A copy of the manifest is put in a safe place so that the exact cargo is known, even in the event the vessel is destroyed. A copy of a ship's manifest is kept on board for cargo identification purposes in the event of a search.

The Persistence crew went so far as to give each ALE visitor a visitor's tag, but they didn't write their names down?  That I find really difficult to imagine.

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 




Kyle says he has no idea who they were.  Kyle was keeping the diary.

The log of a ship is kept by the ships captain.  Why would Kyle have anything to do with this log?  It wasn't his job. Is it possible he just doesn't remember their names? Seems logical- not sinister to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: AZSunny on November 23, 2008, 11:52:14 AM
The log of a ship is kept by the ships captain.  Why would Kyle have anything to do with this log?  It wasn't his job. Is it possible he just doesn't remember their names? Seems logical- not sinister to me. (try it again out of the quote box.....sorry)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 11:53:32 AM
?????

But Kyle said that was not him...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 11:54:33 AM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366270#msg366270

******* question:

Quote
I learned from a source that there is only one place/person(?) on Aruba where a large commercial fish trap would have originated.  This should make it a reasonable venture figuring out who's trap we found.  The next logical move would be after finding them, asking them to explain their missing trap.  1) How did they lose it  2) why was it lost where it was 3) what were it's contents when it was "lost" and 3) what boat was used to transport the trap.

Any ideas of who may have possessed such a trap?
Approx. 7.5 x 7.5 x 2.5ft, and 200-300lbs, hundreds of feet of rope complete with 4-point rigging. 



klaasend question:

Quote
RUMOR is that such a trap could have been used as a drug "post office" of sorts.  I have no idea who would have been the owner of the trap but suspect if true it was put there intentionally.

It was also mentioned that a trap that size could have come from one of the Venezuelan fishing ships passing through.

oceanexploration's response:

Quote
We've internally discussed the possibility of a "post office" of sorts while awaiting forensic testing results. 
The problems with this theory include:
 
-little or no evident anchor scars from a boat or boats at or anywhere near the site which would support diving ops.
-The trap shows no apparent evidence of human tampering one would expect from in situ placement and removal of objects inside the trap. The sand inside the trap shows no disruption.  The soft growth on the trap shows no obvious scars, where something scrapes or slides on the trap during a placement or withdrawal.

The potential issues of a Venezuelan fishing vessel passing through:
- The location of the trap is significantly out of the way for passing through vessels. 
- The location of the trap is not in an area where fishermen fish with commercial traps.
- There are no significant near by seabed obstructions which the trap would have gotten hung-up on to explain it's loss.
- The trap is only in 90ft of water, which makes it easily recoverable by divers if accidentally lost.
Other notes:
- The location is in the lee of the island, which makes the location somewhat weather protected and therefore less likely to have been lost during a storm.
- The trap appears to be in it's original location, as evident by an impact depression in the seabed clearly seen in the sonar.
-It appears the trap hit the bottom very hard as in a free fall.  One corner hit just before the others and the trap seemingly "bounced" a few feet and remained in its current position and orientation.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 12:00:05 PM
MumInOhio > Relax  ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:01:54 PM

Quote
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Persistence/Ron1.jpg)

What do you think?  Maybe red shirt?


bump

Anyone?  Yes or No, I can take it!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:02:55 PM
Do we have this pic of Deepak's car?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/DeepaksCar-1.jpg)

That's a good picture it certainly was NOT the car taken into custody to be processed by ALE.  That one did NOT have tinted windows & the hub caps only had five spokes not the six seen in the above photo.  LieRuba is such a disgrace, this all should have been solved within 30 days.  What a bunch of cowardly criminals, can't wait til they have to face the music, the enabler's of the slootscum's.





Touch base with Rob, Carpe, and Wreck.  They spent days comparing the Hondas.  I think it's all back in Shango somewhere.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/deepakcartowedeer.png)

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Cars%20Boats/KalpoeHondaCivic.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 23, 2008, 12:03:01 PM
I remember this.  Sounds like the large cage was shoved off...not lowered....I remember searching forever for who on Aruba owned such a large trap.  Kyle said he was told only one person.   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:13:44 PM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/trap4.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/1Trap.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:14:35 PM
MumInOhio > Relax  ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Johan, I know what you mean, I thought the same!  Maybe she was just being sarcastic?   ::MonkeyConfused::

Did Peter say anything else about Renee Gielen's crock that I'd like to know?  I loved the "sunstroke" one!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:15:54 PM
Teacat
So the cage was opened on the divers side.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/diversinwater.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:18:07 PM
?????

Kyle said NO
Quote from: oceanexploration on November 20,2008 at 04:00:07 PM
BTW, this is certainly NOT John Silvetti.  I do not know this man.  He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.new#new


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:19:58 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/profile.jpg)
I turned him
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Aruba%20Law%20E/groucho.jpg)
Anyone think here are are two guy's and who are they ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: oceanexploration on November 23, 2008, 12:21:25 PM
To clarify a few points so you aren't distracted or mislead by emotional opinions: 

1st - Pipeline surveys resemble just that.. a pipeline.  They are aligned with a route corridor from point A to point B.  This search was a squarish grid centered on finding Natalee Holloway and has no other purpose.  Suggesting anything else is insulting your own intelligence. 

2nd - Louis and John had no alterior motives with this search.  If they did, obviously something further would have come of it businesswise.  It hasn't.  Calling them "American Traitors" is again an insult to your own intelligence. 

I support freedom of speech and respect opinion, but not where the facts do not support it.  This is borderline libel and similar to saying the Apollo moon landing was staged.  I've worked along side both Louis and John (Silvetti is NOT red shirt lol).  They both sacrificed a lot personally to conduct this search.  Perfect people they are not.  However, calling them traitors is past opinion.  Do not let your emotions interfere with what you know to be true regarding this case.

3rd - All visitors on board the Persitence signed in.  Their names were recorded in the Ships log. I do not have this, nor do I have the time or access to track it down.  If it were relevant to the case it has been forwarded to the FBI.  Don't you think the FBI knows exactly who was on that boat and if it were important?  My job had nothing to do with logging visitors, as I am not a secretary.  The notes I kept were for my own records and pertained mainly to successfully conducting a very technically demanding search.

I am not reluctant to help where I am able, but I am reluctant to naming friends and coworkers names involved in the search when their pictures get posted on the net.  Do you know how creepy that is?  It's been almost a year since the search began.  With the exception of a notable few, I can't remember the names of all who came on board.  Even their faces are fading in my mind. 

My prayers and blessings go out to all those who have worked tirelessly on this case and to the Holloway-Twitty family.  YOU are a major reason why this case is still alive.  I pray, hope, and trust that this case will be solved and justice carried out here on Earth in the near future.  Keep hope alive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 12:21:29 PM

Quote
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Persistence/Ron1.jpg)

What do you think?  Maybe red shirt?

I vote "no" but what do I know?  ::MonkeyRoll::

bump

Anyone?  Yes or No, I can take it!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 12:23:19 PM
There's a good close up of John Silvetti on his website....St. Jude's Aim for the Cure scrapbook section....2007.  I'm having trouble grabbing it, so I hope this link brings you to it. 

http://silvettigroup.com/checkindex/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:25:15 PM
Hi Kyle,

I hope maybe you can answer this.

Was any type of dive performed on the cage we've all been discussing between Christmas Eve when it was seen on the sonar reading, and before the December 29th ROV dive?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:26:57 PM
Thanks Teacat!  I appreciate the response!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: oceanexploration on November 23, 2008, 12:31:18 PM
Hi Kyle,

I hope maybe you can answer this.

Was any type of dive performed on the cage we've all been discussing between Christmas Eve when it was seen on the sonar reading, and before the December 29th ROV dive?

I found the trap sonar target at 1:42 am on Christmas morning.  I was asked if I had any targets to investigate with the ROV on Dev 29th.  I did.  We then performed the 1st ROV dive and confirmed the sonar target was the trap.  This was the first ROV dive performed.  No other dives were performed prior to this.  I kept the sonar target list very confidential.  I didn't need people knowing about it and people on board knew well enough not even to ask.  When it was time to dive I have the target location. Until then, it was kept confidential.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:33:40 PM
Hi Kyle,

I hope maybe you can answer this.

Was any type of dive performed on the cage we've all been discussing between Christmas Eve when it was seen on the sonar reading, and before the December 29th ROV dive?

I found the trap sonar target at 1:42 am on Christmas morning.  I was asked if I had any targets to investigate with the ROV on Dev 29th.  I did.  We then performed the 1st ROV dive and confirmed the sonar target was the trap.  This was the first ROV dive performed.  No other dives were performed prior to this.  I kept the sonar target list very confidential.  I didn't need people knowing about it and people on board knew well enough not even to ask.  When it was time to dive I have the target location. Until then, it was kept confidential.

Thank you Kyle!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:35:32 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/redshirt-1.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/manwithhat.jpg)
Does anyone think they are the same guy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 23, 2008, 12:37:04 PM
Was information and material forwarded to the FBI directly by The Persistence...or did the information/material get forwarded by way of the Aruban authorities?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 12:42:50 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/redshirt-1.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/manwithhat.jpg)
Does anyone think they are the same guy?

No, in my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 12:44:16 PM
Kyle...The last time you were here,you said that Tim left to go to Costa Rica. This is the first I heard of this. Is this corrct?

Thanks In Advance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 12:44:33 PM
Hi Kyle,

I hope maybe you can answer this.

Was any type of dive performed on the cage we've all been discussing between Christmas Eve when it was seen on the sonar reading, and before the December 29th ROV dive?

Texasmom: Thank you for posting such a clear and succinct question!

Kyle, I honestly mean you NO DISRESPECT in any of my questions. Please understand that and know the questions come from this place:
You were an integral part , and indeed one of a very FEW WHO ACUTALLY KNOW FROM FIRST -HAND KNOWLEDGE and NOT SPECULATION, of a search that has been foremost in this forum's collective minds and we have been  trying to determine who these people in these few posts photos are. As you have been willing to answer many questions based on FACTS, I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that you might be able to place names with faces. As you state that you hesitate to do so and find it creepy, I now respectfully back off and away.

I do wish you well and thank you for your all your outstanding efforts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 12:48:09 PM

I believe that when Kyle described the cage, he said one side was not in good shape and the door was actually laying on the floor of the cage.  The items sampled IIRC were on top of the door.  So they could easily view inside without looking through mesh.

if the door is on the floor, do you mean the cage's door is on the ocean floor? if so, do you mean the items sampled were still inside the cage or laying on top of the cage?  Either way, the photos still look like the things Kermit circled (the shoe) are INSIDE a cage. How does the camera appear to be inside with the items? Can someone post the photos again so we know what I'm talking about?


Ok. Now if we go to 2:49 on the Dateline show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kg231BJ-rk&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kg231BJ-rk&feature=related) you can see the cage and it looks wholy intact on top, assuming that is the "top" of the cage. Where does the door attach to this cage; on a side? from the top, anyone?
I believe from the side, I found OE's post about it:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=40

56   Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -  on: March 19, 2008, 03:27:10 PM 
Quote
Quote from: ******* on March 19, 2008, 03:21:50 PM

Thanks! I was figuring about the same,but wasn't sure if it could have been 10 years or so.

Was that cage intact/closed when you viewed it? Just wondering if it was,because that would help keep everything in the cage that was originally placed there. Also it would keep out the large fish that live at that depth.

Response from oceanexploration

Quote
It's possible to have been 10 years or so.  I don't know for certain and don't have any way to readily test this. The trap was somewhat intact.  It's north side was in poor shape, with significant deterioration of it's northern panels.  The trap's doop is usually fastened to the outside of the trap.  It was laying inside the trap, as if pushed open. The contents sampled inside the trap were laying on top of the door.  The trap was found in 90 ft.

______________________________________________
oceanexploration
Scared Monkey
Online
Posts: 220

           Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #171 on: March 19, 2008, 04:21:31 PM »

After the Jan 7th dive, I was scheduled to take a short break on land, staying at the Holiday Inn between Jan 9th and returning to the Persistence on Jan 14th.  I had been working steadily since Dec 15th and needed a break.  It was a coincidence I was around to be walking the beach to observe what I saw with the vessel at or near the site on the 11th and 12th of Jan.  I don't know for certain if there is anything to it.  When asked if they were diving the site, they replied: "we don't have dive capabilities".


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366826#msg366826


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 12:50:59 PM
MumInOhio > Relax  ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Yes...Johan...Take some time off, relax...no need for some of us to keep spending all these hours each day looking for the answers.

Some amongst us are in the know, have the answers and we will find out in due time.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 01:09:01 PM
MumInOhio > Relax  ?? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Yes...Johan...Take some time off, relax...no need for some of us to keep spending all these hours each day looking for the answers.

Some amongst us are in the know, have the answers and we will find out in due time.  ::MonkeyWink::

Not to worry, Mum, we will find out when arrest are made.
That is like saying When Pigs Fly. IMO  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 01:12:05 PM
Does anybody think the cop on the right looks like the guy in the red shirt?

(http://onzemanoparuba.web-log.nl/photos/uncategorized/2007_01_007_1.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 01:13:09 PM
Hi Kyle,

I hope maybe you can answer this.

Was any type of dive performed on the cage we've all been discussing between Christmas Eve when it was seen on the sonar reading, and before the December 29th ROV dive?

I found the trap sonar target at 1:42 am on Christmas morning.  I was asked if I had any targets to investigate with the ROV on Dev 29th.  I did.  We then performed the 1st ROV dive and confirmed the sonar target was the trap.  This was the first ROV dive performed.  No other dives were performed prior to this.  I kept the sonar target list very confidential.  I didn't need people knowing about it and people on board knew well enough not even to ask.  When it was time to dive I have the target location. Until then, it was kept confidential.




When Persistence left, we were told that there were still over a hundred targets to check.  Is there any plan to go back and check these targets?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 01:18:21 PM
I do think it could be DTKM in the red shirt.  His appearance in a suit and tie is very different than in casual clothes.  His chin and shape of face, cheek bones looks very similar to me.  JMHO

There were people that thought it was Silvetti but Kyle said it was not Silvetti and it was someone that came on board with the Arubans.



I dunno if these help at all...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/profile.jpg)


Does Bulldog have a camera around his neck?
I don't think so... I think that would be a crazy-small camera on a very short leash if it were around Bulldog's neck. Perhaps it's on someone standing just to the right of him?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: oceanexploration on November 23, 2008, 01:19:44 PM
Kyle…You said Tim went to Costa Rica!

Help Please!


My mistake.  I meant Nicaragua.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 01:19:59 PM
Ocean,
Was there ever a representative of the American government on board?
Was a member of the FBI ever on board?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 01:20:24 PM
Does anybody think the cop on the right looks like the guy in the red shirt?

(http://onzemanoparuba.web-log.nl/photos/uncategorized/2007_01_007_1.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

He does, somewhat, Pita.  If it's him, he seems a lot heavier in the red shirt.   ::MonkeyWink::    I was wondering how many of these guys could be investigators from NL and was searching for pics a bit ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 01:28:06 PM
Does anybody think the cop on the right looks like the guy in the red shirt?

(http://onzemanoparuba.web-log.nl/photos/uncategorized/2007_01_007_1.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

He does, somewhat, Pita.  If it's him, he seems a lot heavier in the red shirt.   ::MonkeyWink::    I was wondering how many of these guys could be investigators from NL and was searching for pics a bit ago.


Yes, I agree.  The man in the red shirt looks heavier.   I don't know when the photo of the cop was taken.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 01:32:05 PM
Does anybody think the cop on the right looks like the guy in the red shirt?

(http://onzemanoparuba.web-log.nl/photos/uncategorized/2007_01_007_1.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/RedShirt.jpg)

He does, somewhat, Pita.  If it's him, he seems a lot heavier in the red shirt.   ::MonkeyWink::    I was wondering how many of these guys could be investigators from NL and was searching for pics a bit ago.

I think he looks similar too Pita, wish we could see more of his face; but I also agree with 2nj. There are supposedly four investigators on the case.  From the A & E presentation I recall them (IIRC, Dolph) saying that; but they didn't say where they are from or I don't remember it.  I was thinking maybe they are from Holland.  I hope 2nj can find some pics!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:41:21 PM
To clarify a few points so you aren't distracted or mislead by emotional opinions: 

1st - Pipeline surveys resemble just that.. a pipeline.  They are aligned with a route corridor from point A to point B.  This search was a squarish grid centered on finding Natalee Holloway and has no other purpose.  Suggesting anything else is insulting your own intelligence. 

2nd - Louis and John had no alterior motives with this search.  If they did, obviously something further would have come of it businesswise.  It hasn't.  Calling them "American Traitors" is again an insult to your own intelligence. 

I support freedom of speech and respect opinion, but not where the facts do not support it.  This is borderline libel and similar to saying the Apollo moon landing was staged.  I've worked along side both Louis and John (Silvetti is NOT red shirt lol).  They both sacrificed a lot personally to conduct this search.  Perfect people they are not.  However, calling them traitors is past opinion.  Do not let your emotions interfere with what you know to be true regarding this case.

3rd - All visitors on board the Persitence signed in.  Their names were recorded in the Ships log. I do not have this, nor do I have the time or access to track it down.  If it were relevant to the case it has been forwarded to the FBI.  Don't you think the FBI knows exactly who was on that boat and if it were important?  My job had nothing to do with logging visitors, as I am not a secretary.  The notes I kept were for my own records and pertained mainly to successfully conducting a very technically demanding search.

I am not reluctant to help where I am able, but I am reluctant to naming friends and coworkers names involved in the search when their pictures get posted on the net.  Do you know how creepy that is?  It's been almost a year since the search began.  With the exception of a notable few, I can't remember the names of all who came on board.  Even their faces are fading in my mind. 

My prayers and blessings go out to all those who have worked tirelessly on this case and to the Holloway-Twitty family.  YOU are a major reason why this case is still alive.  I pray, hope, and trust that this case will be solved and justice carried out here on Earth in the near future.  Keep hope alive.


You want to take me on?
Then let's do it right here!
I'll expose YOUR part along with the cover-up right here and now.
Otherwise, I suggest you crawl back in to your hole.
Because frankly, I am not only willing, but able to expose this whole thing.
Lets do it big boy!
Come on!
Just say YES!









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 01:43:20 PM
 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 23, 2008, 01:44:52 PM
Kermit, did you get my email???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:46:13 PM
Kermit, did you get my email???

No I didn't.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:46:44 PM
Hi Debbie.
Miss you Miss Debbie.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 23, 2008, 01:48:17 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:49:38 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 23, 2008, 01:51:32 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.

I was referring to you, Kermit. You have made serious accusations -- I think you should expose it now if you indeed have the facts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:51:42 PM

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #679 on: November 20, 2008, 06:10:15 PM »
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.280



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:52:13 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.

I was referring to you, Kermit. You have made serious accusations -- I think you should expose it now if you indeed have the facts.

Just waiting for oceanexploration to say YES.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 01:52:30 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

I agree!  Let's have the truth, so we can move on from here.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 01:53:13 PM
I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 01:56:12 PM
I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.

I'll tell you what is going on. oceanexploration just needs to say YES to moi!

But it seems he left.

I'm going to go get some flies.

I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 01:57:31 PM
OE left?   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 02:02:54 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 02:03:48 PM
What just happened?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 02:06:09 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.

God Bless you Klaas for saying this.  This is driving me crazy.  Imagine what this is doing to the family.  Greta has a short clip up on Joran on her site.  Just spit it out everyone.  This has gone on long enough.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 23, 2008, 02:06:48 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.

God Bless you Klaas for saying this.  This is driving me crazy.  Imagine what this is doing to the family.  Greta has a short clip up on Joran on her site.  Just spit it out everyone.  This has gone on long enough.
AMEN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 02:08:01 PM
I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.

I'll tell you what is going on. oceanexploration just needs to say YES to moi!

But it seems he left.

I'm going to go get some flies.

I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.




Kermit,
I know you've taken some heat here for trying to tell us what went on.  I want to know the truth!  I am a simple mother that has been consumed by this case; my husband told me the other day that I must stop burning my candle from both ends.  Trying to work all day and find the answers in this case all night is taking it's toll.  But I can't give up now!  I NEED TO KNOW, and I won't stop until I do.  I don't understand a lot of what I should be looking for so it's very time consuming to try to understand it all.  I believe you do have the facts, and I have the utmost respect for your sharing what you have, and what you will with us.  I realize that the truth may make us think twice about who we've listened to and conclusions we've reached because of it; but I for one am ready to face it, and move on.  I just want to know the truth.

It's all about Natalee!

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Persistence/12302007DoubleRainbow-1-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 23, 2008, 02:08:44 PM
Not meaning to disrupt anybody's fight but has everybody seen this:

http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/11/23/sneak-peek-joran-van-der-sloot-on-the-record-on-monday/


November 23rd, 2008 12:32 PM Eastern
Sneak Peek - Joran van der Sloot ON THE RECORD on Monday!
by Greta Van Susteren


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 02:08:55 PM
Don't get me started on GRETA.  Ok, so now she interviews Joran (admitted liar) in Thailand and we are suppose to believe that somehow he's told Greta some truths?   ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 02:09:06 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.

I am so with you on that... The Truth..
This is a serious group or researchers who deserve the Truth.

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 02:12:31 PM
What just happened?   ::MonkeyConfused::

I think that Kermit called Kyle a liar and challenged him on his
part in the cover up.  Kyle hung around for a while while he
made a few calls and he was told to not respond.
They know the frog is on to them. JMHO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 02:13:03 PM
Don't get me started on GRETA.  Ok, so now she interviews Joran (admitted liar) in Thailand and we are suppose to believe that somehow he's told Greta some truths?   ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

AMEN to that too!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 02:13:14 PM
I have spent many hours researching and discussing this case.  I would like to stop going in circles.  I would love to know what happened and not necessarily Greta's version.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 02:13:27 PM
Frog fight:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1yDnEY_EOU


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 02:14:48 PM
What just happened?   ::MonkeyConfused::

I think that Kermit called Kyle a liar and challenged him on his
part in the cover up.  Kyle hung around for a while while he
made a few calls and he was told to not respond.
They know the frog is on to them. JMHO

I agree.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: oceanexploration on November 23, 2008, 02:15:12 PM
Hi Kyle,

I hope maybe you can answer this.

Was any type of dive performed on the cage we've all been discussing between Christmas Eve when it was seen on the sonar reading, and before the December 29th ROV dive?

Texasmom: Thank you for posting such a clear and succinct question!

Kyle, I honestly mean you NO DISRESPECT in any of my questions. Please understand that and know the questions come from this place:
You were an integral part , and indeed one of a very FEW WHO ACUTALLY KNOW FROM FIRST -HAND KNOWLEDGE and NOT SPECULATION, of a search that has been foremost in this forum's collective minds and we have been  trying to determine who these people in these few posts photos are. As you have been willing to answer many questions based on FACTS, I assumed (perhaps wrongly) that you might be able to place names with faces. As you state that you hesitate to do so and find it creepy, I now respectfully back off and away.

I do wish you well and thank you for your all your outstanding efforts.

Thanks for understanding.  Mr. Red shirt came on the Persistence along with Dolf, Mos, et al for the meeting on the 30th.  I understand the reasoning to find out the names of people present during the Dec 30th meeting.  Those names are in the ship's logs.  I don't find it useful to post the names of all the search members who happen to get screen captured.  jmho.

Just a work of warning...
I know I will get in trouble over this one, but it must be said:
Many people have enjoyed (in a sick way) moments of spotlight as a result of this case and investigation.  Many have come and gone who present their theories as fact (whether truth mixed with fiction or totally bogus), stand by it, gain a lot of attention, get proved as liars, and then dissapear in shame.  This has been a repeat pattern since the beginning of the case.  Some have gotten caught up simply by emotion, others have gotten caught up by sharing genuinely good ideas then took their theories too far.
 
For instance, I've read many of Kermit's posts. I would rather not single him out because he's not alone.  I personally love how he thinks. I really enjoy how many posters here think.  He's got a wonderful mind indeed.  However and for whatever reasons, he has presented many of his recent ideas as fact and tagged along with those facts opinions which are very much false.  In defense of his claims, he asks that you trust him.  To someone who actually observed what happened, the difference from fact is perfectly clear and would be embarassing for him.  For the rest, they are easily mislead. This is a terrible waste of time and intellect, but I suppose it's viewed as morbidly entertaining. 

The realities of this search and difficult case are very hard to accept, perhaps due to the incredible contrast in character displayed.  On one hand, you have a terrible crime committed and made worse by a blatant coverup at high levels of foreign authority.  On the other, you have a search conducted with the sole purpose to find Natalee and bring closure to the family. This search was conducted because of the goodness of the hearts and efforts of the team leaders and persistence of the family - often at great expense to themselves and their reputations. However, fears of ruined reputations and lost money and failed efforts were put aside from the start of the search. When we did this search, we knew many would accuse us of alterior motives such as oil exploration or planning pipeline routes doubting that good people still exist and do good things for others.  This comes with the territory I suppose and is no surprise to those few who really know. 

As for myself, I made a decision many months ago that I wouldn't let the false theories get to me personally, and that I wouldn't try to correct every false thing I read, or damaging statement.  The information I have that I will not post online, comment on, or talk about even in person, I have shared with trusted senior FBI agents.  I have shared what I can here and elsewhere that I felt safe sharing.  The rest is in the hands of those who are in the proper position to act on the information given to them.  Beth and the FBI know what I know. This is my peace.  The theories will remain entertaining to me but for those who are mislead by them, I am truly sorry. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 02:16:31 PM
Frog fight:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1yDnEY_EOU
:smt041    FUNNY.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Anna on November 23, 2008, 02:17:02 PM
Well, soooorrrrr--rrry!

I certainly wont bother you with any more of her post.

Carry on with your so-called serious chain jerking!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 02:18:50 PM
Frog fight:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1yDnEY_EOU
::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 02:22:58 PM
Well, soooorrrrr--rrry!

I certainly wont bother you with any more of her post.

Carry on with your so-called serious chain jerking!



Anna
- I don't know why you are upset but if it's about my post on Greta, I was typing it the same time you were posting.  I hadn't even seen your post.   I PLAN ON WATCHING GRETA on Monday, I'm just not getting my hopes up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 23, 2008, 02:25:41 PM
So OE apparently didn't see Kermit's pposts?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Frijole on November 23, 2008, 02:25:49 PM
 ::MonkeyEek::  Interesting day in the cage.

Am trying to figure the Greta thing out.  She goes to Thailand and interviews Joran in the summer but we are just hearing about it.  The only thing I can think of is that she had info corroborated and perhaps is a part of this whole series of actions happening all of a sudden... perhaps to force this thing to closure.?.?.?

I agree that anything Joran says at this point is pure "caca" but for whatever reason she no longer believes him, she believes Paulus is involved and MOST IMPORTANT she is now screaming over the airwaves that there has been a coverup.

So... when I watch Joran spew total crap on Monday night I will pray that there is a higher purpose for this airing and that maybe... just maybe after 3 years the family will have something go in their favor.  God bless them, all of you who have worked so hard over the years standing by our girl.

Frijole


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 02:31:43 PM
::MonkeyEek::  Interesting day in the cage.

Am trying to figure the Greta thing out.  She goes to Thailand and interviews Joran in the summer but we are just hearing about it.  The only thing I can think of is that she had info corroborated and perhaps is a part of this whole series of actions happening all of a sudden... perhaps to force this thing to closure.?.?.?

I agree that anything Joran says at this point is pure "caca" but for whatever reason she no longer believes him, she believes Paulus is involved and MOST IMPORTANT she is now screaming over the airwaves that there has been a coverup.

So... when I watch Joran spew total crap on Monday night I will pray that there is a higher purpose for this airing and that maybe... just maybe after 3 years the family will have something go in their favor.  God bless them, all of you who have worked so hard over the years standing by our girl.

Frijole

Amen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: oceanexploration on November 23, 2008, 02:32:32 PM
So OE apparently didn't see Kermit's pposts?

I just now read them.

I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.

I'll tell you what is going on. oceanexploration just needs to say YES to moi!

But it seems he left.

I'm going to go get some flies.

I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.




Excuse me?  You can think what you want and mislead as many as you wish Kermit.  It's not my concern.  It's not the first time you've turned people against me so you can propogate your lies.  You know what I mean.  I welcome you to do the same here. The result will be the same.  I've been a source of information for as long as I could and it was genuine.  Kermit, I'm sorry your ego got in the way of reality.  You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way. 

My appologies to all the self-thinking, genuine, and honest people here.  I'm done posting here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 02:35:13 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 02:35:18 PM
::MonkeyEek::  Interesting day in the cage.

Am trying to figure the Greta thing out.  She goes to Thailand and interviews Joran in the summer but we are just hearing about it.  The only thing I can think of is that she had info corroborated and perhaps is a part of this whole series of actions happening all of a sudden... perhaps to force this thing to closure.?.?.?

I agree that anything Joran says at this point is pure "caca" but for whatever reason she no longer believes him, she believes Paulus is involved and MOST IMPORTANT she is now screaming over the airwaves that there has been a coverup.

So... when I watch Joran spew total crap on Monday night I will pray that there is a higher purpose for this airing and that maybe... just maybe after 3 years the family will have something go in their favor.  God bless them, all of you who have worked so hard over the years standing by our girl.

Frijole

Nice post, Frijole.  You have become so mature over the years we have been
here.  You used to just make me laugh everyday.  Now you make me think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: blah on November 23, 2008, 02:36:17 PM
So OE apparently didn't see Kermit's pposts?

I just now read them.

I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.

I'll tell you what is going on. oceanexploration just needs to say YES to moi!

But it seems he left.

I'm going to go get some flies.

I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.




Excuse me?  You can think what you want and mislead as many as you wish Kermit.  It's not my concern.  It's not the first time you've turned people against me so you can propogate your lies.  You know what I mean.  I welcome you to do the same here. The result will be the same.  I've been a source of information for as long as I could and it was genuine.  Kermit, I'm sorry your ego got in the way of reality.  You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way. 

My appologies to all the self-thinking, genuine, and honest people here.  I'm done posting here.


I believe kermit lost his mind.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 02:38:04 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 02:39:11 PM
I stand by the American searchers onboard the Persistence. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 02:40:08 PM
I stand by the American searchers onboard the Persistence. 

Me too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Frijole on November 23, 2008, 02:43:12 PM


Nice post, Frijole.  You have become so mature over the years we have been
here.  You used to just make me laugh everyday.  Now you make me think.

Ah Magnolia... that is sweet.  Truth be told I am over 50.  ::MonkeyLaugh::

I ran out of jokes ...this case has saddened me so.  I have read daily for years.  I just am not nearly as patient or detail oriented as some of you.  I don't know how you have done it but I have never given up hope... I just got more quiet. I know all the other monkey alumni feel the same.

And when that day comes when we have some or any form of closure it will be a huge reunion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: wreck on November 23, 2008, 02:45:58 PM
I don't know WHAT to think. I strongly feel their are major irregularities with the whole fish cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 02:48:10 PM
I stand with the girl, Natalee Holloway.

That's what it's all about for me, I just want the truthful answers; that's all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 02:55:51 PM
" Beth and the FBI know what I know."

So True.. Very Good.. Understood.. Without a doubt..

It has been a long time.. We have learned over this time many things.. This has never been done before and these groups are cutting edge in open group research, and an experiment in human kindness care and concern..

The F.B.I. has a very deep round file.. It has no bottom..
They investigate and They answer to only one entity.. Who decides to follow up on or prosecute..
Other then that they can tell us NOTHING ..

Beth.. Is a mom. Who wants justice for Natalee.. She asked for HELP.
Dave is a dad who has tried everything to find his daughter..
God Bless both of them..


We are the Force behind her and him.
We write OTHERS for help and we donate money to help.
Persistence would not even be there if it was not for the caring united states citizens such as US.


When we walk away.. She will be alone in her battle for the Truth.
Without readership, Greta finds another story..  That is the way the world turns..
Without citizen concern Politicians could care less.. That is the truth.

Without representation from our opinionated side, Americans would think vacations in Aruba are wonderful.
Without the countless hours or research by these thousands of people on all of these forums there would be nobody questioning anybody on anything..

Yes some make false theory and accusations..We find our way though that smoke.
The best researchers do not state theory as fact.

As a senior business person you would have a very hard time justifying the money spent to send Persistence to Aruba to take pictures of the ocean floor.
The money spent was outrageous... To say "donation" means YOU take no money.
Over a Million spent on a boat.. It already has the equipment on it. Fuel and food is one thing but that did not add up to the money spent..

But as long as Beth has answers.. I am satisfied with that.. If she is happy.

To call us "Morbid" in our efforts to help is an outrage.. I am pissed about that..!!

I have been on many foot searches for lost and missing people and nobody has ever called me that for the effort spent doing so. Nobody pays me a dime for my expenses out..

This was a different kind of search for the truth and it has cut into my life for more then 3.5 years.. Time and money donated.

I did it for my donation of time for a lost and missing American Citizen.. Natalee Holloway.

 I continue to seek the truth and to find the Correct Answers.
If Beth says it is over.. It is over.
For us to question and seek answers is acceptable behavior from a research point of view.

Of Course anybody fabricating false leads is discounted and shamed.

I believe in my Fellow Americans and I believe in the American crew members on the good ship Persistence.

jmho



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 02:55:56 PM
I stand by the American searchers onboard the Persistence. 

Me too!

Well I've read alot of stuff here lately...but I gotta say also that I don't believe OE or any of his crew has done anything sinister or not on the up and up...MO So I ditto this post....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 03:03:01 PM
At this point I do not know what is what and who to believe anymore.  I still go back to this saying repeated on here so many times before:  "It is not over until Beth says it is over" and I have yet to hear Beth say it is over.  If Beth has the answers and she is satisfied with it then I would expect Beth to convey that to Scared Monkeys, Red, Klaas or whoever so we can move on as she has done.  Sorry but I do not believe it is over yet for Beth or Dave as they have come out this past week on Greta's show and pretty much say so.  I do stand with Natalee and her family and will look for direction from them in the coming week/month/year or however it takes for them to find peace and believe JUSTICE for Natalee has been served.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:05:38 PM
Beth Holloway: Not knowing is-- is-- that's the daily torture.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

And so her parents keep searching, hoping that somewhere off the coast of Aruba, a boat called the Persistence, may bring them an answer -- and peace.

Dave Holloway: If she's there, they'll find her. If they don't find her, we did-- we did the very best we could do, no question about it.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/6/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 03:05:43 PM
I have a feeling the chollers are outnumbering the normal Arubans anymore.  

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_49640.php


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/ArubaTourist112108.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 03:06:34 PM
I Don't know about anyone else but i'm patiently waiting for Kermit to once and for all lay the theory,as well as facts regarding his theory of a cover-up and the "Traitors"..If no facts the snake comes for the Frog..OceanExploration gave you the OK from what i understand!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 03:08:52 PM
I have a feeling the chollers are outnumbering the normal Arubans anymore.  

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_49640.php


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/ArubaTourist112108.jpg)


This just goes to show how much Americans DID not listen to what happened to Natalee in Aruba.  I do believe this is getting worse on the island and ALL Americans should heed the warning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 03:11:50 PM
I have a feeling the chollers are outnumbering the normal Arubans anymore.  

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_49640.php


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/ArubaTourist112108.jpg)


I agree.  So much crime going on, it's unbelievable!  Very few of the articles make it to amigoe where it can be read in English.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:13:20 PM
Klaas their are  normal Arubans? When did this start  ::MonkeyHaHa:::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:15:52 PM
Kermit

oceanexploration
Scared Monkey
 Offline
Posts: 223

      Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #760 on: Today at 02:32:32 PM »
Quote from: Kermit on Today at 01:56:12 PM
I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.

Excuse me?  You can think what you want and mislead as many as you wish Kermit.  It's not my concern.  It's not the first time you've turned people against me so you can propogate your lies.  You know what I mean.  I welcome you to do the same here. The result will be the same.  I've been a source of information for as long as I could and it was genuine.  Kermit, I'm sorry your ego got in the way of reality.  You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way. 

My appologies to all the self-thinking, genuine, and honest people here.  I'm done posting here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bastibro on November 23, 2008, 03:18:44 PM
I stand with the girl, Natalee Holloway.

That's what it's all about for me, I just want the truthful answers; that's all.

AMEN Texasmom . Those are from the heart.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 03:19:36 PM
I would like to have answers.  Last night, a monkey told us that there would be arrests.  OE and Kermit are heatedly debating information that we don't have.  Tomorrow night we will hear Greta's summery of what took place that dreadful night.  I would like to have as much information as possible so that I can evaluate what is reality and what is not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 03:21:37 PM
I would like to have answers.  Last night, a monkey told us that there would be arrests.  OE and Kermit are heatedly debating information that we don't have.  Tomorrow night we will hear Greta's summery of what took place that dreadful night.  I would like to have as much information as possible so that I can evaluate what is reality and what is not.

That is what i'm waiting for from Kermit.OE opened the door for Kermit...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:24:06 PM
So OE apparently didn't see Kermit's pposts?

I just now read them.

I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.

I'll tell you what is going on. oceanexploration just needs to say YES to moi!

But it seems he left.

I'm going to go get some flies.

I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.




Excuse me?  You can think what you want and mislead as many as you wish Kermit.  It's not my concern.  It's not the first time you've turned people against me so you can propogate your lies.  You know what I mean.  I welcome you to do the same here. The result will be the same.  I've been a source of information for as long as I could and it was genuine.  Kermit, I'm sorry your ego got in the way of reality.  You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way. 

My appologies to all the self-thinking, genuine, and honest people here.  I'm done posting here.


oceanexploration posted:
You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way.

So you are saying YES? We are going to expose the truth here and now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:26:06 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:27:03 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 03:27:46 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



Clarifying FAITH is not Keepthefaith. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:27:48 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth
oceanexploration
<snip>
 Kermit, I'm sorry your ego got in the way of reality.  You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way.


looks like a YES to me


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 03:28:42 PM
He already said he would NOT stand in your way..

If you have something to say.. Post It.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:29:31 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.

Me too! Although, oceanexploration has threatened me if I do. BUT if he gives a YES that I can share it, I will

What do you say ocean, lets post what we know to be true.
You'll feel a whole lot better if you do.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 03:29:33 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



May i ask Kermit?Why you need OE's approval to expose the TRUTH???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 23, 2008, 03:29:55 PM
Yes, please Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:30:31 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth

I agree 100%

I just need oceanexploartion's YES. Perhaps he would like to help and then you'll all be glad that finally
no more lying from these other people.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 03:31:43 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


you need his permission ? ::MonkeyConfused::

LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:32:24 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



May i ask Kermit?Why you need OE's approval to expose the TRUTH???

Because he has directly threatened me.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 03:33:56 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth

I agree 100%

I just need oceanexploartion's YES. Perhaps he would like to help and then you'll all be glad that finally
no more lying from these other people.



you need his permission ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 03:34:09 PM
Kermit

So OE apparently didn't see Kermit's pposts?

I just now read them.

I, for one, would just love to know what is going on.

I'll tell you what is going on. oceanexploration just needs to say YES to moi!

But it seems he left.

I'm going to go get some flies.

I have not, nor would or will I ever lie to ANYONE! It is not how I live my life. And I won't start now.
What I have said is the truth, I confronted him, he took off. Maybe he needs some time to plan another diversion or search his soul. I hope it's the latter.




Excuse me?  You can think what you want and mislead as many as you wish Kermit.  It's not my concern.  It's not the first time you've turned people against me so you can propogate your lies.  You know what I mean.  I welcome you to do the same here. The result will be the same.  I've been a source of information for as long as I could and it was genuine.  Kermit, I'm sorry your ego got in the way of reality.  You may freely do as you please. I will not stand in your way. 

My appologies to all the self-thinking, genuine, and honest people here.  I'm done posting here.


He's gone and it doesn't look like he's coming back. What do you mean by he's threatened you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 03:34:36 PM
How has OE threatened Kermit?  I think this needs to be settled.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:34:54 PM
Don't get me started on GRETA.  Ok, so now she interviews Joran (admitted liar) in Thailand and we are suppose to believe that somehow he's told Greta some truths?   ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

Have to say I agree with you.
The truth is waiting on oceanexploration to come back and face kermit and say YES - expose it ALL.

Come on Oceanexploration!
Lets do it!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:35:32 PM
How has OE threatened Kermit?  I think this needs to be settled.

HE directly threatened me with a lawsuit if I tell.

I don't take likely to threats.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:36:13 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth

I agree 100%

I just need oceanexploartion's YES. Perhaps he would like to help and then you'll all be glad that finally
no more lying from these other people.



you need his permission ?

Yes. I need him to say YES KERMIT show them the TRUTH!

and I will.

I promise.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 03:36:59 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



May i ask Kermit?Why you need OE's approval to expose the TRUTH???

Because he has directly threatened me.


 ::MonkeyNoNo::  WHY?  OE, this needs to be cleared up now.  Monkeys need peace of mind in this matter!  (this monkey anyway!)  Now, PLEASE! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: FaithMS on November 23, 2008, 03:37:27 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



If I sent you anything it was a long time ago and it was a copy/paste from somewhere else. I have no personal knowledge whatsoever of what's going on.

Faith


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 03:37:55 PM
How has OE threatened Kermit?  I think this needs to be settled.

HE directly threatened me with a lawsuit if I tell.

I don't take likely to threats.






How can someone sue you if you are telling the truth?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:38:19 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



Clarifying FAITH is not Keepthefaith. ::MonkeyWink::

Sorry not you. It is another Faith that is friends with vms.
Faith emailed me the picture of Lorenzo and from then on people accused me of posting that picture. I never did post it. At the time, Faith emailed me about him and then later emailed about her son saying he was in some band.

I could have cared less about Lorenzo.

What I DO care about is the exposure of the truth.

I hope oceanexploration will join us here and say YES to Kermit to expose the truth that we know.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 23, 2008, 03:38:23 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth

I agree 100%

I just need oceanexploartion's YES. Perhaps he would like to help and then you'll all be glad that finally
no more lying from these other people.



you need his permission ?

Yes. I need him to say YES KERMIT show them the TRUTH!

and I will.

I promise.


Kermit, I have read ALL your posts, I know your heart.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:39:33 PM
How has OE threatened Kermit?  I think this needs to be settled.

HE directly threatened me with a lawsuit if I tell.

I don't take likely to threats.






How can someone sue you if you are telling the truth?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Copyright laws etc.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:41:12 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth

I agree 100%

I just need oceanexploartion's YES. Perhaps he would like to help and then you'll all be glad that finally
no more lying from these other people.



you need his permission ?

Yes. I need him to say YES KERMIT show them the TRUTH!

and I will.

I promise.


Kermit, I have read ALL your posts, I know your heart.

Thank you always.
I am not the bad guy in this.
Although, I do take the heat from certain people.
When the TRUTH gets exposed and I hope we can do it here,
you'll see that it is not moi who has been lying to anyone.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 03:42:22 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.
Kermit lets  get down to the truth

I agree 100%

I just need oceanexploartion's YES. Perhaps he would like to help and then you'll all be glad that finally
no more lying from these other people.



you need his permission ?

Yes. I need him to say YES KERMIT show them the TRUTH!

and I will.

I promise.



You can't sue a Frog!!  Show us what you've got Kermit.
You are coming off as insincere after all of this talk.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 03:42:31 PM
I am not taking sides but I want the TRUTH.  OE needs to come back here and let's get this over with.  He runs away when confronted.  He ran away the other night when I asked him a direct question.  I even commented on the fact that I must have run him off.  He has pretty much accused us of slander and saying that is grounds for a lawsuit.  I do not appreciate that.  Asking questions is not the same as slandering someone.  Finding information on the internet is not the same as slandering anyone. 

Come back OE. 

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 03:42:41 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



FYI
I have never claimed to know everything. Actually, I know very little.

Also for your information, I did not even know Faith when you posted that lie. To my knowledge, she was not even a member here at that time.

You don't fool me.
Knock yourself out, Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:42:53 PM
THIS IS BS I SAW NO THREAT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:43:06 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



If I sent you anything it was a long time ago and it was a copy/paste from somewhere else. I have no personal knowledge whatsoever of what's going on.

Faith

Hi Faith,

vms is under the impression that it was ME who lied to her or someone about that picture of that kid in the band and claimed it was Lorenzo. Remember your emails to me about him and also about Ringo having the picture of Lorenzo baldheaded who his friend knew about that lived in Florida.

If you like, I can get the emails and post them so vms knows that you found that picture on site, not me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:44:23 PM
THIS IS BS I SAW NO THREAT


He threatened me and he knows where and how if I expose the information & evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:44:38 PM
The way I remember it ,we were all in the same place, and we were all friends


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 03:44:50 PM
Seriously, after 3 1/2 years I'm getting tired of all the cloak and dagger.  It may be necessary, but I'd really like to cut through all the crap and get down to the truth.

Amen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:45:34 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



FYI
I have never claimed to know everything. Actually, I know very little.

Also for your information, I did not even know Faith when you posted that lie. To my knowledge, she was not even a member here at that time.

You don't fool me.
Knock yourself out, Kermit.


The picture was posted at natalee.net site by FAITH MS

I don't mind posting Faith's email for you.
Since you have a difficult time believing the truth hon.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 03:46:17 PM


Does anyone honestly expect the "truth" to be posted on a forum when it seems no one even knows the truth?...

Kermit I don't know you very well but what is your "position" in this case that would have you knowing the truth?..I'm sincerely asking....

Ocean isn't going to talk about this here...he has more common sense than that....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:46:25 PM




Yes. I need him to say YES KERMIT show them the TRUTH!

and I will.

I promise.

oceanexploration is on  right now 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 03:46:26 PM
THIS IS BS I SAW NO THREAT


He threatened me and he knows where and how if I expose the information & evidence.




 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyConfused::  ::MonkeyEek:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: oceanexploration on November 23, 2008, 03:46:34 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:46:55 PM
The way I remember it ,we were all in the same place, and we were all friends

I have no idea why vms doesn't want to believe or give credit to Faith for posting that picture.
But whatever.
Like I said, not a problem for me to post the email if Faith doesn't mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:47:55 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:48:16 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



or better yet, why don't you do it for these fine folks then?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: FaithMS on November 23, 2008, 03:48:20 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



Clarifying FAITH is not Keepthefaith. ::MonkeyWink::

Sorry not you. It is another Faith that is friends with vms.
Faith emailed me the picture of Lorenzo and from then on people accused me of posting that picture. I never did post it. At the time, Faith emailed me about him and then later emailed about her son saying he was in some band.

I could have cared less about Lorenzo.

What I DO care about is the exposure of the truth.

I hope oceanexploration will join us here and say YES to Kermit to expose the truth that we know.



Slipknot? That was a long time ago at NH.net that we were researching that band.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 03:49:23 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 

Ocean...I've always admired your dedication to this case and thank you for doing what you feel is best here today....you always do...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:50:14 PM
Ok, if this gets me banned, so be it. I am sick of this. I'm sorry, Klaas.

Kernit,

Maybe you've forgotten the LIE you told, while posting under another nic, about having seen Lorenzo's tickle page?




It was not a lie.
AND it was your best friend FAITH who posted it. I still have her emails. Should I post them?

See, maybe you don't know everything vms.



Clarifying FAITH is not Keepthefaith. ::MonkeyWink::

Sorry not you. It is another Faith that is friends with vms.
Faith emailed me the picture of Lorenzo and from then on people accused me of posting that picture. I never did post it. At the time, Faith emailed me about him and then later emailed about her son saying he was in some band.

I could have cared less about Lorenzo.

What I DO care about is the exposure of the truth.

I hope oceanexploration will join us here and say YES to Kermit to expose the truth that we know.



Slipknot? That was a long time ago at NH.net that we were researching that band.

YES. That is what I recall too. VMS thinks I found that picture. When it was your find.
Remember we emailed about it and I was asking you where you found it.

AND Frank and I were trying to figure out where that was at in the background. He finally figured it out.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:53:31 PM
Unless oceanexploration comes back and says YES kermit can post the evidence,
I'll wait for his YES.


ALL I need is YES KERMIT you can post the evidence & information you know about.

Just say YES OCEANEXPLORATION.

or YOU DO IT oceanexploration. Show these fine folks the truth.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 03:53:53 PM
So Kermit are you ready


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 23, 2008, 03:54:13 PM
To clarify a few points so you aren't distracted or mislead by emotional opinions: 

1st - Pipeline surveys resemble just that.. a pipeline.  They are aligned with a route corridor from point A to point B.  This search was a squarish grid centered on finding Natalee Holloway and has no other purpose.  Suggesting anything else is insulting your own intelligence. 

2nd - Louis and John had no alterior motives with this search.  If they did, obviously something further would have come of it businesswise.  It hasn't.  Calling them "American Traitors" is again an insult to your own intelligence. 

I support freedom of speech and respect opinion, but not where the facts do not support it.  This is borderline libel and similar to saying the Apollo moon landing was staged.  I've worked along side both Louis and John (Silvetti is NOT red shirt lol).  They both sacrificed a lot personally to conduct this search.  Perfect people they are not.  However, calling them traitors is past opinion.  Do not let your emotions interfere with what you know to be true regarding this case.

3rd - All visitors on board the Persitence signed in.  Their names were recorded in the Ships log. I do not have this, nor do I have the time or access to track it down.  If it were relevant to the case it has been forwarded to the FBI.  Don't you think the FBI knows exactly who was on that boat and if it were important?  My job had nothing to do with logging visitors, as I am not a secretary.  The notes I kept were for my own records and pertained mainly to successfully conducting a very technically demanding search.

I am not reluctant to help where I am able, but I am reluctant to naming friends and coworkers names involved in the search when their pictures get posted on the net.  Do you know how creepy that is?  It's been almost a year since the search began.  With the exception of a notable few, I can't remember the names of all who came on board.  Even their faces are fading in my mind. 

My prayers and blessings go out to all those who have worked tirelessly on this case and to the Holloway-Twitty family.  YOU are a major reason why this case is still alive.  I pray, hope, and trust that this case will be solved and justice carried out here on Earth in the near future.  Keep hope alive.

Thank you SO much for the straight talk, for taking the time, making the effort, to set things straight around here. From me that is greatly appreciated, more than I can say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:54:44 PM
So Kermit are you ready

I'm always ready baby.

JUST GIVE ME OCEANEXPLORATIONS YES AND I'LL DO IT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 03:55:50 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.  

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 




 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 03:57:34 PM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Cloak_and_Dagger_1_%281983%29.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 03:58:07 PM
oceanexploration
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.660




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 03:58:50 PM
We have been scammed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 03:59:13 PM
Unless oceanexploration comes back and says YES kermit can post the evidence,
I'll wait for his YES.


ALL I need is YES KERMIT you can post the evidence & information you know about.

Just say YES OCEANEXPLORATION.

or YOU DO IT oceanexploration. Show these fine folks the truth.







Did he not just tell you "NO"?...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Poochy on November 23, 2008, 03:59:41 PM
This is Beth's call. It is her child that is missing, not ours, although we stand by the girl.

If posting information would upset this unsolved case, then why even think to post it?
 
If the FBI wants to keep it under wraps, then why blab about it here on a public board?

So what - you know. So does OE. But he's been a gentleman about it.

We all want her to come home. We all want the truth.

But not this way.  IMHO.

OE - thanks for what you did, what you do, and what you continue to do by keeping what you may
know out of the public so the real investigation can take place under the radar.












Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 04:00:17 PM
No, Kermit, you posted the lie about Lorenzo's tickle page here at Scared Monkeys, under your other nick. Faith and Blonde were not even members here then.

This has nothing to do with the accusations you are making now. I'm only saying if you are going call others liars, you have a past too. You posted a flat out lie.

Get on with the show.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 04:02:49 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 23, 2008, 04:03:20 PM
Come on, Klaasend said yes, she wouldn't do so without Red's approval.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:03:28 PM
No, Kermit, you posted the lie about Lorenzo's tickle page here at Scared Monkeys, under your other nick. Faith and Blonde were not even members here then.

This has nothing to do with the accusations you are making now. I'm only saying if you are going call others liars, you have a past too. You posted a flat out lie.

Get on with the show.




Oh I know what you are talking about. I hear Shango thought I had some kind of information on Lorenzo.
I did see a website that was suppose to be that guy with the long dread locks and it was titled Lorenzo.
Which turned out to not be the Lorenzo that we all know now is the bald headed guy. IF you want to think I was lying, then so be it! I just posted what I saw is all. Then as many of those links, it went dead because he removed his website.
 If that makes me a liar in your eyes, then so be it.
You don't have to believe anything I say, or post, it's your prerogative.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:04:46 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?

Because I know that that is a lie.
The evidence has or was NOT given to the FBI by him.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:04:52 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?
The FBI never told Kermit no to go public.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 04:05:24 PM
This is Beth's call. It is her child that is missing, not ours, although we stand by the girl.

If posting information would upset this unsolved case, then why even think to post it?
 
If the FBI wants to keep it under wraps, then why blab about it here on a public board?

So what - you know. So does OE. But he's been a gentleman about it.

We all want her to come home. We all want the truth.

But not this way.  IMHO.

OE - thanks for what you did, what you do, and what you continue to do by keeping what you may
know out of the public so the real investigation can take place under the radar.


I couldn't agree more!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:06:34 PM
I'm still waiting for oceanexploration to come back and hopefully he'll have a change of heart and soul and say YES KERMIT post it! or he'll do it!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:06:54 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?

Am I losing it?...Does "N O" spell "Y E S" ???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:07:45 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?
The FBI never told Kermit no to go public.

LOL blonde. That was funny.
No they did not!
However I have been directly threatened by ocean and he knows it.
Alls he has to do is the RIGHT THING AND SAY YES KERMIT!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 04:07:59 PM
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Cloak_and_Dagger_1_%281983%29.jpg)

yes... and the Wizard of Oz's Man behind the curtain, and cryptomonicons... Jeesh, what a day. And here I thought the majority of us were actually on the side of "truth" and "justice".  Whatever that means!

A FEW of you know ALOT, some of you know something and most of the rest of us (and yeah I include myself here!) are just flailing around in the murk.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: San on November 23, 2008, 04:10:21 PM
This is Beth's call. It is her child that is missing, not ours, although we stand by the girl.

If posting information would upset this unsolved case, then why even think to post it?
 
If the FBI wants to keep it under wraps, then why blab about it here on a public board?

So what - you know. So does OE. But he's been a gentleman about it.

We all want her to come home. We all want the truth.

But not this way.  IMHO.

OE - thanks for what you did, what you do, and what you continue to do by keeping what you may
know out of the public so the real investigation can take place under the radar.


I would like the truth to come out at the right time.  I agree that it is Beth's call to expose what she knows.  Beth has been through torture the past 3 1/2 years and if I have to wait I am willing to wait.  There is a reason for everthing.  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Pita on November 23, 2008, 04:10:52 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 


So it is a YES I can post the evidence?



Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?
The FBI never told Kermit no to go public.

No, but perhaps if Kyle shared classified information with Kermit, it needs to remain that way.

We don't need to put information out there that could further jeopardize the case.  That's my concern.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:11:25 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



I recall a very early Lorenzo Myspace-not sure if this is the same as you are referring to.
Way back-first 2 weeks following disappearance along with Freddies and all the others
would sure like to have them to compare now...wish I had saved them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:11:38 PM
IMO Kyle made a deal not Kermit

Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential.When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:12:16 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 04:12:35 PM
This all brings back a lot of memories.
People who claim to know more than us poor dumb monkeys,
who have to exchange all of their information in private and
then go off and start their own private board..

Where is that board now?

It is hard for me to believe that if Beth knew Natalee was
found, she would not have shared that information with
people she knew cared.  If she did, shame on her.

I for one have been taken in by the frog and I believe by
Kyle as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 04:14:39 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 04:15:18 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Amen!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: always 1 on November 23, 2008, 04:16:25 PM
I believe Rob and Carpe stood by the frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 04:16:28 PM
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/2826672412_5f9f051d0d.jpg)

He said  " NO "

 Volunteer or not, when the Big Guys speak.. You must listen.

The F.B.I. wants to keep it all secret so that corrupt politicians and other officials in Aruba win in the end.
But that is just my opinion..

Ya can't pull yer weapon Kermit.. ::MonkeyEek::

NO Means No.

Or yes depending on what prison you want to spend time in.. ::MonkeyTongue::

lol


It is all none sense anyways.. Some of these people really astound me.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:16:54 PM


Not particularly... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 04:17:24 PM
This all brings back a lot of memories.
People who claim to know more than us poor dumb monkeys,
who have to exchange all of their information in private and
then go off and start their own private board..

Where is that board now?

It is hard for me to believe that if Beth knew Natalee was
found, she would not have shared that information with
people she knew cared.  If she did, shame on her.

I for one have been taken in by the frog and I believe by
Kyle as well.

You're not alone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:17:25 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



I recall a very early Lorenzo Myspace-not sure if this is the same as you are referring to.
Way back-first 2 weeks following disappearance along with Freddies and all the others
would sure like to have them to compare now...wish I had saved them.

I think it might have been this link that vms thinks I lied to her about. The picture was labeled LORENZO
and I probably posted the link. Although, I am not sure. Then FaithMs found the picture of another guy who turned out to be slipnot and she thought it was Lorenzo way back in the beginning and she posted it.
I believe this is what vms is basing her belief that I lied to her on.
Could be wrong, though, she'll have to explain it. This was all back in 2005.

Lorenzo:
http://album.coolaruba.com/albums/mei2005/Tatoo14mei/normal_tattoo%20%2846%29.jpg

LORENZO van Riijn:
http://photo.tickle.com/image/2/4/6/P7/2462781P7063382009.jpg





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 04:17:54 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
AHAHAHAHAHHA  no, apparently not! and neither do @33 lurkers and a cageful of monkeys!  Funny how the info that a fight broke out leaks so easily but information of facts and evidence just keeps shifting and slotting away.....  very strange......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:19:09 PM
This all brings back a lot of memories.
People who claim to know more than us poor dumb monkeys,
who have to exchange all of their information in private and
then go off and start their own private board..

Where is that board now?

It is hard for me to believe that if Beth knew Natalee was
found, she would not have shared that information with
people she knew cared.  If she did, shame on her.

I for one have been taken in by the frog and I believe by
Kyle as well.

Sorry you feel that way.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:20:09 PM
So Kermit are you ready

I'm always ready baby.

JUST GIVE ME OCEANEXPLORATIONS YES AND I'LL DO IT


Guess it's NO. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 04:20:59 PM
Okay I have waited long enough.

If oceanexploration says YES Kermit can post the information -  I shall do so.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:21:53 PM


Here we go again....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 04:23:05 PM
Those links are dead ends..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 04:24:07 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



I recall a very early Lorenzo Myspace-not sure if this is the same as you are referring to.
Way back-first 2 weeks following disappearance along with Freddies and all the others
would sure like to have them to compare now...wish I had saved them.

I think it might have been this link that vms thinks I lied to her about. The picture was labeled LORENZO
and I probably posted the link. Although, I am not sure. Then FaithMs found the picture of another guy who turned out to be slipnot and she thought it was Lorenzo way back in the beginning and she posted it.
I believe this is what vms is basing her belief that I lied to her on.
Could be wrong, though, she'll have to explain it. This was all back in 2005.

Lorenzo:
http://album.coolaruba.com/albums/mei2005/Tatoo14mei/normal_tattoo%20%2846%29.jpg

LORENZO van Riijn:
http://photo.tickle.com/image/2/4/6/P7/2462781P7063382009.jpg





Thinks you lied? Don't sugarcoat, please.
I am not the only one who remembers the lie. Yes, I hear Shango called you on it. Is that when you changed your name?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:24:42 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
Thank You for that ,I wanted to tell her to zip the lip  before. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:25:56 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
Thank You for that ,I wanted to tell her to zip the lip  before. ::MonkeyHaHa::

Well now why didn't you Ms. Blonde?... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 04:26:33 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
Thank You for that ,I wanted to tell her to zip the lip  before. ::MonkeyHaHa::

I erased the first six things I started to say!  Trying not to get banned here, but I'm very frustrated right now!
 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 04:26:55 PM
Kermit,

You said something about being sued for copyright laws, is this about a movie deal?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:27:08 PM
I believe Rob and Carpe stood by the frog.

I stand by the frog.  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bastibro on November 23, 2008, 04:27:28 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
AHAHAHAHAHHA  no, apparently not! and neither do @33 lurkers and a cageful of monkeys!  Funny how the info that a fight broke out leaks so easily but information of facts and evidence just keeps shifting and slotting away.....  very strange......

43 lurkers now  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 04:28:37 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
Thank You for that ,I wanted to tell her to zip the lip  before. ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:28:43 PM
If you have the facts -- bring it. No use in holding back now.

Yeah oceanexploriation. Come on lets do it.

Just say YES.


LETS  DO THIS BECAUSE, I WILL NOT STOP, WE NEED THE TRUTH

I agree 100%

Alls oceanexploration has to do is say YES to kermit and I'll post the information that will expose the truth.



I recall a very early Lorenzo Myspace-not sure if this is the same as you are referring to.
Way back-first 2 weeks following disappearance along with Freddies and all the others
would sure like to have them to compare now...wish I had saved them.

I think it might have been this link that vms thinks I lied to her about. The picture was labeled LORENZO
and I probably posted the link. Although, I am not sure. Then FaithMs found the picture of another guy who turned out to be slipnot and she thought it was Lorenzo way back in the beginning and she posted it.
I believe this is what vms is basing her belief that I lied to her on.
Could be wrong, though, she'll have to explain it. This was all back in 2005.

Lorenzo:
http://album.coolaruba.com/albums/mei2005/Tatoo14mei/normal_tattoo%20%2846%29.jpg

LORENZO van Riijn:
http://photo.tickle.com/image/2/4/6/P7/2462781P7063382009.jpg





Sorry Kermie links have gone bad....one of the many things that make this case so frustrating.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:30:01 PM
LoRain, I was a little busy with Kermit,and oceanexploration


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 04:30:24 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
AHAHAHAHAHHA  no, apparently not! and neither do @33 lurkers and a cageful of monkeys!  Funny how the info that a fight broke out leaks so easily but information of facts and evidence just keeps shifting and slotting away.....  very strange......

43 lurkers now  ::MonkeyShocked::
Yes, my bet is there are a few sad to say monkeys that thrive on this stuff.  Phone calls and emails travel fast.  
 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 23, 2008, 04:33:47 PM
I have heard enough of what Kermit will not reveal.

KLASS

What do you think is going on here?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 04:37:04 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
AHAHAHAHAHHA  no, apparently not! and neither do @33 lurkers and a cageful of monkeys!  Funny how the info that a fight broke out leaks so easily but information of facts and evidence just keeps shifting and slotting away.....  very strange......

43 lurkers now  ::MonkeyShocked::
Yes, my bet is there are a few sad to say monkeys that thrive on this stuff.  Phone calls and emails travel fast.  
 ::MonkeyNoNo::
I should have kept that thought to myself, sorry everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: vms on November 23, 2008, 04:41:12 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

Don't you have somewhere else you'd rather be?   ::MonkeyNoNo::
AHAHAHAHAHHA  no, apparently not! and neither do @33 lurkers and a cageful of monkeys!  Funny how the info that a fight broke out leaks so easily but information of facts and evidence just keeps shifting and slotting away.....  very strange......

43 lurkers now  ::MonkeyShocked::
Yes, my bet is there are a few sad to say monkeys that thrive on this stuff.  Phone calls and emails travel fast.  
 ::MonkeyNoNo::
I should have kept that thought to myself, sorry everyone.

No, you are right, IMO, and I am sorry for contributing to that. I will logout and lurk until I calm down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: GrannyToad on November 23, 2008, 04:41:50 PM
I've been planning to live forever because I want to learn how everything turns out.

Everything.

It's worked, so far.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:44:12 PM


Well my appologies also....I just made a comment....with all the "ratings" talk going on...I was making a funny but apparently it didn't go over too well.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 04:44:15 PM
lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:44:49 PM
(http://www.newyorkartists.net/somerville/old-woman-toad.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 04:46:39 PM
(http://www.newyorkartists.net/somerville/old-woman-toad.jpg)



I'm 45, but I feel like the old lady; and may look like her too at this point!  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 04:47:24 PM
Half an egg is better than an empty shell   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 04:49:01 PM
Half an egg is better than an empty shell   ::MonkeyHaHa::

"Some see the glass as half-empty, I see the glass as half-full".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:49:48 PM
Were all here for the Truth of what happened to Natalee not "ratings" LoRain gezz
For all we know Kermit might be getting prepared for their presentation of the truth.
You know it take's time to get all that together, pictures, working links and all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:50:59 PM


"A JOKE" Blonde....bad timing perhaps on my part but just the same...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:51:09 PM
I am providing the half time relief program. After this please return from your corners chake hands and........carry on. We have all been here to long. Take a deep breath........

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBEIWGdT-nc


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:52:10 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 04:52:32 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Scard%20Monkeys%20Mod/LOCK2.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 23, 2008, 04:53:33 PM
One thing I learned:  OE started out thinking we were nuts mistrusting the Arubans.  He was working side by side....  Seems he has come around to the thought of there being a serious problem. Would love to know at what point he changed his mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:54:04 PM
 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::
That did it I'm better now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 04:55:46 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..

That is a ridiculous suggestion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 04:56:17 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..
ALE  Aruba Law Enforcement  what are you nuts child you might as well burn it. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 04:56:29 PM
It just occured to me....copyright laws.
Kermit has pictures from the ROV that we have not seen.

I apologize, Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 04:57:07 PM
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 04:57:38 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..

That is a ridiculous suggestion.


Yeah you're right....what WAS I thinking??... ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Buckeye on November 23, 2008, 04:58:18 PM
It just occured to me....copyright laws.
Kermit has pictures from the ROV that we have not seen.

I apologize, Kermit.

Can one copyright ziplock bags??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 04:59:19 PM
One of My Chihuahua's jumped up and sang along with the ape man song..  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 04:59:23 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..

Take it to MIP6 or Renfro.  Same difference.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 05:00:19 PM
One of My Chihuahua's jumped up and sang along with the ape man song..  ::MonkeyLaugh::


 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 05:00:47 PM
It just occured to me....copyright laws.
Kermit has pictures from the ROV that we have not seen.

I apologize, Kermit.


That was what I was thinking also.  The only thing I could come up with was a movie. Not all the pictures got posted and that would explain why private eye brought up the denim material.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 05:01:10 PM


Or Greta or Renee??...... ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 05:01:35 PM
One of My Chihuahua's jumped up and sang along with the ape man song..  ::MonkeyLaugh::


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 05:03:16 PM
Can someone answer for me!Is Peter R. Devries doing a show Tonight,as well as what it pertains to??Thanx.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 05:04:55 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..
Well I suppose because giving ANYTHING to ALE is tantamount to throwing it into an abyss. And it seems giving the FBI anything is more of the same. And then you add to it threats of lawsuits and flinging allegations into the mess.... I'm surprised anyone is willing to say ANYTHING they may know as truth. Honestly it is getting to me.... this whole "I know a secret but YOU have to sort of the clues over in Shango or I'd tell but I shall have to lock you away forever, or Just give me the green light, OE " or "Beth has to be the one. "

I'm starting to believe she has come to terms with information complete that makes her move on and perhaps that is what we ought to do. I hate the idea though that by do that, dropping the case off the radar, *we*, this collective, will allow JVDS and his family and the _________________________  (rrrrrrr it's so hard to hold myself back from what I feel about the POWERS on Aruba) on that blight of an island to waltz back to health with the funding of tourists.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Edward on November 23, 2008, 05:05:19 PM
The bottom line is this...
If the F.B.I. requested that Kyle NOT say anything then not one of us " including a frog" can back stab Kayle, as He is Family.

That is just my opinion..when Kyle wrote that part I changed my mind on knowing.

On the other hand..
The F.B.I. told us we could not talk about Nita Mayo.. Nothing has ever happened to find her ever since.. That upsets me..

So I have 2 side to that thought..
But protection of the integrity of Kayle in the eyes of the F.B.I. is number one.

So I will go outside and try to paint something and get over it..

Keep me informed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 05:06:13 PM
OK, even if the skull that Tim felt 99.9% sure was Natalee turned out not to be, then who's remains were they? Things like this, the open ended questions make ALE the most unreliable source. I just would have thought the answers to some questions would have been made clear by this late date.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 05:06:24 PM
It just occured to me....copyright laws.
Kermit has pictures from the ROV that we have not seen.

I apologize, Kermit.
Seaeye ROV in action!
click on this little movie

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 23, 2008, 05:07:28 PM
time will tell, i imagine.

monkeys, frogs and toads...OH MY! ::MonkeyTongue::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 05:08:33 PM
Can someone answer for me!Is Peter R. Devries doing a show Tonight,as well as what it pertains to??Thanx.

it was not about the holloway case !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 05:10:16 PM
Can someone answer for me!Is Peter R. Devries doing a show Tonight,as well as what it pertains to??Thanx.

it was not about the holloway case !

Thanx Johan!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: friend of monkeys on November 23, 2008, 05:12:26 PM
ty johan...

i am going to wax my banannas .

hi 2 NJ....good to see u working hard here!
Care to share what you make of this monkey pooh???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 05:13:46 PM
It just occured to me....copyright laws.
Kermit has pictures from the ROV that we have not seen.

I apologize, Kermit.
Seaeye ROV in action!
click on this little movie

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html


All are copyrighted by Kyle.
I don't think copyrights cover blogs. Blogs are still uncertain
terrain.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 05:18:28 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

LoRain - I really resent that comment and you're lucky I didn't immediately ban you for it. You couldn't be further from the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: San on November 23, 2008, 05:21:05 PM
Aruba should never be trusted with any information.

If our FBI's can't get involved for other reasons, I would want John Q. Kelly to go on Greta and expose everything I have for the world to see.  Even though Greta tended to believe Joran I would still want her to have the story first.  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 05:21:10 PM


Look at all the folks signed in here....is this latest conflict yet another thing to boost ratings?...of Scared Monkeys?....surely not... ::MonkeyNoNo::

LoRain - I really resent that comment and you're lucky I didn't immediately ban you for it. You couldn't be further from the truth.

Klaasend....it was a joke....sorry to offend you and others here...I know you aren't out for ratings...geez....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 05:23:51 PM
I have heard enough of what Kermit will not reveal.

KLASS

What do you think is going on here?



Well I was gone for an hour and all hell breaks loose.  I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.  All I ever want is for the truth to be told, no matter where that leads.  I don't care much for secret forums and hidey holes where people discuss things you and I are obviously not intelligent enough to comprehend.

Does that give you an idea how I feel about all this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 05:25:56 PM


Everyone is always asking folks if they have the truth why not send it to ALE...why post it on a forum?..

If I had the truth ALE is the LAST PLACE I would go with it and I've felt that way since about June 15, 2005.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 05:27:53 PM
   
My idea is to tell what you know

 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 05:28:57 PM
It just occured to me....copyright laws.
Kermit has pictures from the ROV that we have not seen.

I apologize, Kermit.
Seaeye ROV in action!
click on this little movie

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html


All are copyrighted by Kyle.
I don't think copyrights cover blogs. Blogs are still uncertain
terrain.

How does Kyle own the copyrights?Did he use his own equipment?Another question.How did they assemble the Persistence crew?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 05:38:41 PM
The way I remember the copyright on internet post is..
If you put your mark on it.  They have to say it is your
photo if it is used elsewhere.  Not much of a copyright law
just a nod.  sotospeak.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 05:39:37 PM
   
My idea is to tell what you know

 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Me too Johan, or don't tell me you know it in the first place!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: LoRain on November 23, 2008, 05:45:33 PM
   
My idea is to tell what you know

 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Me too Johan, or don't tell me you know it in the first place!

Now this just might work..... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 05:46:15 PM
The way I remember the copyright on internet post is..
If you put your mark on it.  They have to say it is your
photo if it is used elsewhere.  Not much of a copyright law
just a nod.  sotospeak.
SO you have to give them credit or a link.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 05:46:38 PM
ty johan...

i am going to wax my banannas .

hi 2 NJ....good to see u working hard here!
Care to share what you make of this monkey pooh???


Hi, FOM....good to see you, too.  I can't make anything of this monkey pooh, though I tried to understand it.  I'm no different than anyone else....have no insider information....  I wish for the case to be solved, the truth to be told and Natalee to be returned to her family. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Sea Searcher on November 23, 2008, 05:47:07 PM
sry O/T

Klaas, I sent you an email...did you receive it ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Magnolia on November 23, 2008, 05:50:55 PM
The way I remember the copyright on internet post is..
If you put your mark on it.  They have to say it is your
photo if it is used elsewhere.  Not much of a copyright law
just a nod.  sotospeak.
SO you have to give them credit or a link.

Exactly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 05:53:02 PM
ty johan...

i am going to wax my banannas .

hi 2 NJ....good to see u working hard here!
Care to share what you make of this monkey pooh???


Hi, FOM....good to see you, too.  I can't make anything of this monkey pooh, though I tried to understand it.  I'm no different than anyone else....have no insider information....  I wish for the case to be solved, the truth to be told and Natalee to be returned to her family. 




I agree 2NJ and I fear that we will hear another fairy tale tomorrow that will set this case back several years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 06:06:17 PM
sry O/T

Klaas, I sent you an email...did you receive it ?

No, send it again:

smklaas@hotmail.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 06:07:16 PM
I'm as interested in knowing what is going on as anyone but I have to admit that I do feel that this is all coming to a head--Soon.  I don't think we will be finding anything out from Kermit or OE as it seems both have deserted us rather than reveal what is going on.  My only hope is Beth and Dave do know what is happening (and that includes knowing what Greta is doing behind the scenes). 

I am throwing this out there (burn me if you wish, it is just my opinion only).  Is there already a lawsuit out there because of the photos?  Tim Miller suddenly backs away from his statement "It looks like a skull", now he has Nejames as a lawyer.  Earlier on in the last thread (somewhere) Kermit said to solve this for Red and clear him.  Kyle said he ONLY gave the photos to FBI.  He says FBI gave them to Dave and Robin posted them on a private blog.  How does he know who the FBI gave them to?  He also said that he made the mistake of trusting Kermit which tells me he shared information with Kermit early on (maybe even the pictures). If you are to believe him that he would never share information that the FBI said to keep quiet about them did he share info with Kermit? Something does not add up to all this.  It is about as perplexing as the sudden departure from Aruba when we were donating money so they could continue the search. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 06:08:25 PM
What if what the Froggy has was never posted on the Internet?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 06:10:38 PM
I'm as interested in knowing what is going on as anyone but I have to admit that I do feel that this is all coming to a head--Soon.  I don't think we will be finding anything out from Kermit or OE as it seems both have deserted us rather than reveal what is going on.  My only hope is Beth and Dave do know what is happening (and that includes knowing what Greta is doing behind the scenes). 

I am throwing this out there (burn me if you wish, it is just my opinion only).  Is there already a lawsuit out there because of the photos?  Tim Miller suddenly backs away from his statement "It looks like a skull", now he has Nejames as a lawyer.  Earlier on in the last thread (somewhere) Kermit said to solve this for Red and clear him.  Kyle said he ONLY gave the photos to FBI.  He says FBI gave them to Dave and Robin posted them on a private blog.  How does he know who the FBI gave them to?  He also said that he made the mistake of trusting Kermit which tells me he shared information with Kermit early on (maybe even the pictures). If you are to believe him that he would never share information that the FBI said to keep quiet about them did he share info with Kermit? Something does not add up to all this.  It is about as perplexing as the sudden departure from Aruba when we were donating money so they could continue the search. 

I agree with you, but Kermit also said that Kyle never gave what the froggy has to the FBI, so how could the FBI have deemed it confidential?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: BUCKSHOT on November 23, 2008, 06:12:21 PM

snipped

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 

Kyle says he has no idea who they were.  Kyle was keeping the diary.

By diary do you mean his log that was on his blog?  If so I think this would be completely separate from any visitor "log" that may have been kept on the boat.  Kyle may not have been responsible for that.  I would think that for security purposes the boat would be required to keep a log of non crew members that board.  It has been quite a while since the mission, and if Kyle knew some of the names then, he may not recall them now; or may not be at liberty to post them here.
From Kyle's posting:
Key Personnel: Bios coming soon! Please check back soon.

Louis Schaefer Jr. - Project Lead and Key Contributor

Tim Miller - Project Management -Founder of Texas Equusearch http://www.texasequusearch.org/

Tim Trahan - Underwater Expeditions - Project Management

John Silvetti - Project Lead and Key Contributor- Responsible for overall project planning and development. Owner of Marine Surveys, LLC . Providing the R/V Persistence for the search effort. http://silvettigroup.com/

Marc Broussard - Project Manager

Kent Bourg- Party Chief

Kyle Kingman - Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist

Dr. Rob Floyd - Marine Geologist /Archaeologist

Anthony Fontenot - Acoustic Positioning Technician
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 5:47 PM

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/11/mobilization.html

I don't see anyone listed as Clerk.... or Secretary. Project Manager, yes. Perhaps that is one responsible?
[/quote]

I do not see HansMos' name, so it must not be completely accurate.

I thought the guy with the moustache was determined to be Groucho.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 06:12:47 PM
What if what the Froggy has was never posted on the Internet?




And where is what Kermit says Kyle shared with the FBI?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 06:15:36 PM
I thought the guy with the moustache was determined to be Groucho.
****

Aka Detective J. Cheever Loophole who caught Peerless Pauline hiding the money.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: johan555 on November 23, 2008, 06:15:47 PM
joran's lawyer  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.foxnews.com/video/?playerId=videolandingpage&referralObject=3210901


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:18:27 PM
BLUE MOON, DID YOU JUST SAY THAT TIM MILLER HAS NEJAME AS A LAWYER???

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 06:21:39 PM
BLUE MOON, DID YOU JUST SAY THAT TIM MILLER HAS NEJAME AS A LAWYER???

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Yes, I do believe that is what I read in the Caylee thread.  I could be wrong on that but I am almost certain of it.  Will try and find that info and post the link.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Sea Searcher on November 23, 2008, 06:21:48 PM
sry O/T

Klaas, I sent you an email...did you receive it ?

No, send it again:

smklaas@hotmail.com

sent again


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 06:22:35 PM
I'm as interested in knowing what is going on as anyone but I have to admit that I do feel that this is all coming to a head--Soon.  I don't think we will be finding anything out from Kermit or OE as it seems both have deserted us rather than reveal what is going on.  My only hope is Beth and Dave do know what is happening (and that includes knowing what Greta is doing behind the scenes). 

I am throwing this out there (burn me if you wish, it is just my opinion only).  Is there already a lawsuit out there because of the photos?  Tim Miller suddenly backs away from his statement "It looks like a skull", now he has Nejames as a lawyer.  Earlier on in the last thread (somewhere) Kermit said to solve this for Red and clear him.  Kyle said he ONLY gave the photos to FBI.  He says FBI gave them to Dave and Robin posted them on a private blog.  How does he know who the FBI gave them to?  He also said that he made the mistake of trusting Kermit which tells me he shared information with Kermit early on (maybe even the pictures). If you are to believe him that he would never share information that the FBI said to keep quiet about them did he share info with Kermit? Something does not add up to all this.  It is about as perplexing as the sudden departure from Aruba when we were donating money so they could continue the search. 

I agree with you, but Kermit also said that Kyle never gave what the froggy has to the FBI, so how could the FBI have deemed it confidential?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.840

 Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #841 on: Today at 03:04:46 PM » Quote 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Pita on Today at 03:02:49 PM
Quote from: Kermit on Today at 02:47:55 PM
Quote from: oceanexploration on Today at 02:46:34 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 



So it is a YES I can post the evidence?




Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?


Because I know that that is a lie.
The evidence has or was NOT given to the FBI by him



texasmom comment:  maybe the "by him" is the key here; maybe somebody else gave it to the FBI and Kyle was contacted by the FBI about it?????

 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 06:24:02 PM
What if what the Froggy has was never posted on the Internet?




And where is what Kermit says Kyle shared with the FBI?

I need to go back and find where Kermit said that...Only reread Kyle's posts so far.

If Kyle holds the Copyright he has to give permission for them to be shown to whomever he shared them with, unless he has posted them himself on the internet, right?

If these were never posted, then permission is needed for another to post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:24:51 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: teacat on November 23, 2008, 06:25:44 PM

snipped

How do you know they didn't write the names down? 

Kyle says he has no idea who they were.  Kyle was keeping the diary.

By diary do you mean his log that was on his blog?  If so I think this would be completely separate from any visitor "log" that may have been kept on the boat.  Kyle may not have been responsible for that.  I would think that for security purposes the boat would be required to keep a log of non crew members that board.  It has been quite a while since the mission, and if Kyle knew some of the names then, he may not recall them now; or may not be at liberty to post them here.
From Kyle's posting:
Key Personnel: Bios coming soon! Please check back soon.

Louis Schaefer Jr. - Project Lead and Key Contributor

Tim Miller - Project Management -Founder of Texas Equusearch http://www.texasequusearch.org/

Tim Trahan - Underwater Expeditions - Project Management

John Silvetti - Project Lead and Key Contributor- Responsible for overall project planning and development. Owner of Marine Surveys, LLC . Providing the R/V Persistence for the search effort. http://silvettigroup.com/

Marc Broussard - Project Manager

Kent Bourg- Party Chief

Kyle Kingman - Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist

Dr. Rob Floyd - Marine Geologist /Archaeologist

Anthony Fontenot - Acoustic Positioning Technician
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 5:47 PM

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2007/11/mobilization.html

I don't see anyone listed as Clerk.... or Secretary. Project Manager, yes. Perhaps that is one responsible?

I do not see HansMos' name, so it must not be completely accurate.

I thought the guy with the moustache was determined to be Groucho.
[/quote]
Buckshot,
That list I copied camme from Kyle's blog, it is a list of team members scheduled to be on the trip to Aruba to search for NH. It is not the list of people that boarded AFTER the arrival.
Just to clarify what I posted....
Cheers


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:27:08 PM
I feel like I am twisting in the wind.  I turn here and think one thing then I go off in a different direction and think another thing.  One thing I am convinced of, this case should have been solved 3 1/2 years ago.  It was not that hard.  The coverup and corruption must go much deeper than I can even imagine.  MOO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 06:27:13 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

They have apparently become new good friends though I have not read anywhere why Tim would need him in a professional capacity. Possibly I just missed it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 06:27:13 PM
I'm as interested in knowing what is going on as anyone but I have to admit that I do feel that this is all coming to a head--Soon.  I don't think we will be finding anything out from Kermit or OE as it seems both have deserted us rather than reveal what is going on.  My only hope is Beth and Dave do know what is happening (and that includes knowing what Greta is doing behind the scenes). 

I am throwing this out there (burn me if you wish, it is just my opinion only).  Is there already a lawsuit out there because of the photos?  Tim Miller suddenly backs away from his statement "It looks like a skull", now he has Nejames as a lawyer.  Earlier on in the last thread (somewhere) Kermit said to solve this for Red and clear him.  Kyle said he ONLY gave the photos to FBI.  He says FBI gave them to Dave and Robin posted them on a private blog.  How does he know who the FBI gave them to?  He also said that he made the mistake of trusting Kermit which tells me he shared information with Kermit early on (maybe even the pictures). If you are to believe him that he would never share information that the FBI said to keep quiet about them did he share info with Kermit? Something does not add up to all this.  It is about as perplexing as the sudden departure from Aruba when we were donating money so they could continue the search. 

I agree with you, but Kermit also said that Kyle never gave what the froggy has to the FBI, so how could the FBI have deemed it confidential?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.840

 Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #841 on: Today at 03:04:46 PM » Quote 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Pita on Today at 03:02:49 PM
Quote from: Kermit on Today at 02:47:55 PM
Quote from: oceanexploration on Today at 02:46:34 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 



So it is a YES I can post the evidence?




Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?


Because I know that that is a lie.
The evidence has or was NOT given to the FBI by him



texasmom comment:  maybe the "by him" is the key here; maybe somebody else gave it to the FBI and Kyle was contacted by the FBI about it?????

 ::MonkeyConfused::


Thanks TM...Me too! ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 06:29:33 PM
What if what the Froggy has was never posted on the Internet?




And where is what Kermit says Kyle shared with the FBI?

I need to go back and find where Kermit said that...Only reread Kyle's posts so far.

If Kyle holds the Copyright he has to give permission for them to be shown to whomever he shared them with, unless he has posted them himself on the internet, right?

If these were never posted, then permission is needed for another to post.

The question i posed earlier and i don't know if it was understood correctly was.Who's property are those photo's truly.

1.The owner of the persistence?
2.The owner of the equipment used for the video,and or images of the ROV?

What i'm trying to say is.If i let you borrow my camera to take a picture do you own the copywright or do i?The owner of the camera?Does this make any sense to anyone??Who had access to these photos,and or video??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 06:30:13 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

KYcat - Red explained it the other night, this is what Red said:


Quote
Monkeys ... the Count is not working for Tim.

It really makes sense if you look at it in this manner. It is my understanding that when TES did the last two searches in FL they received about 85-90 new TES members. Enough that TES may be creating a charter group in Orlando for not if the nest person goes missing, but when. They will have some infrstructure alreasy set up.

It is my understanding that NeJame said he would help in any way possible with the necessary paperwork needed to create such an entity. That's it. As simple as that.

NeJame respects Tim Miller and the work TES does.

Obviously he has ethics and morals as he finally bolted away from the family today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:30:17 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

They have apparently become new good friends though I have not read anywhere why Tim would need him in a professional capacity. Possibly I just missed it.

Thank You BB.  Well, at least Nejame had the good sense to cut the Anthonys loose.  That was a no win situation for him.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:30:27 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Scard%20Monkeys%20Mod/LOCK2.gif)



BUMP  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 06:31:52 PM
Mum,
I was just thinking a little while ago, I am beginning to understand your advice to Johan earlier today.  I just wish I could take the advice myself and be content with it!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: bleachedblack on November 23, 2008, 06:32:10 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

They have apparently become new good friends though I have not read anywhere why Tim would need him in a professional capacity. Possibly I just missed it.

Thank You BB.  Well, at least Nejame had the good sense to cut the Anthonys loose.  That was a no win situation for him.



I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:32:44 PM
KLAAS, THANKS.  I was posting when you posted.  I said the same thing, Nejame cut the As loose.  That certainly shows common sense and morals to me.  I think he was tired of beating his head against the wall with them.  They have their own agenda and are bound and determined to pursue it.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 06:34:04 PM
I'm as interested in knowing what is going on as anyone but I have to admit that I do feel that this is all coming to a head--Soon.  I don't think we will be finding anything out from Kermit or OE as it seems both have deserted us rather than reveal what is going on.  My only hope is Beth and Dave do know what is happening (and that includes knowing what Greta is doing behind the scenes). 

I am throwing this out there (burn me if you wish, it is just my opinion only).  Is there already a lawsuit out there because of the photos?  Tim Miller suddenly backs away from his statement "It looks like a skull", now he has Nejames as a lawyer.  Earlier on in the last thread (somewhere) Kermit said to solve this for Red and clear him.  Kyle said he ONLY gave the photos to FBI.  He says FBI gave them to Dave and Robin posted them on a private blog.  How does he know who the FBI gave them to?  He also said that he made the mistake of trusting Kermit which tells me he shared information with Kermit early on (maybe even the pictures). If you are to believe him that he would never share information that the FBI said to keep quiet about them did he share info with Kermit? Something does not add up to all this.  It is about as perplexing as the sudden departure from Aruba when we were donating money so they could continue the search. 

I agree with you, but Kermit also said that Kyle never gave what the froggy has to the FBI, so how could the FBI have deemed it confidential?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.840

 Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #841 on: Today at 03:04:46 PM » Quote 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Pita on Today at 03:02:49 PM
Quote from: Kermit on Today at 02:47:55 PM
Quote from: oceanexploration on Today at 02:46:34 PM
Kermit,

First, I have NEVER threatened you.  The only thing I said to you is that I do not want to be sued by releasing information into the public that I was specifically told by OUR FBI as confidential. When I'm told not to comment by our FBI, I listen. You clearly do not understand this.

I made a mistake trusting you with so much as a greeting.  It was a gross misjudgement in character on my part. 

We all want the truth out in it's entirety.  The truth will be told by Beth in her terms when SHE feels ready.  It's not up to you or I. If you want the truth, ask BETH, not me.  Your answers will come from her.   

As for me, I stand by Natalee.   I'm sorry Kermit, my answer is NO.  This is my last post at SM. 



So it is a YES I can post the evidence?




Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?


Because I know that that is a lie.
The evidence has or was NOT given to the FBI by him



texasmom comment:  maybe the "by him" is the key here; maybe somebody else gave it to the FBI and Kyle was contacted by the FBI about it?????

 ::MonkeyConfused::




Is this what Kermit has been referring to as the cover up?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 06:35:29 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

They have apparently become new good friends though I have not read anywhere why Tim would need him in a professional capacity. Possibly I just missed it.

Oh I agree with you Bleached but the best I can remember is Nejames will be offering advice and guidance to TES and would be involved in future searches as guidance. Maybe after coming up against Cindy (by both Tim and Nejames) he decided he was more interested in helping Tim with finding missing people than he was interested in helping Cindy and George and KC.  Still looking for that information and I do remember no one was able to state why Tim needed a lawyer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:37:18 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

They have apparently become new good friends though I have not read anywhere why Tim would need him in a professional capacity. Possibly I just missed it.

Oh I agree with you Bleached but the best I can remember is Nejames will be offering advice and guidance to TES and would be involved in future searches as guidance. Maybe after coming up against Cindy (by both Tim and Nejames) he decided he was more interested in helping Tim with finding missing people than he was interested in helping Cindy and George and KC.  Still looking for that information and I do remember no one was able to state why Tim needed a lawyer.

Blue, see Klaas's previous post.  Red explained it.  Thanks for looking.

 ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Blue Moon on November 23, 2008, 06:38:40 PM
Blue, sorry, I wasn't yelling at you.  I just hope Tim doesn't have Nejame as his attorney. 

 ::MonkeyCool::

KYcat - Red explained it the other night, this is what Red said:


Quote
Monkeys ... the Count is not working for Tim.

It really makes sense if you look at it in this manner. It is my understanding that when TES did the last two searches in FL they received about 85-90 new TES members. Enough that TES may be creating a charter group in Orlando for not if the nest person goes missing, but when. They will have some infrstructure alreasy set up.

It is my understanding that NeJame said he would help in any way possible with the necessary paperwork needed to create such an entity. That's it. As simple as that.

NeJame respects Tim Miller and the work TES does.

Obviously he has ethics and morals as he finally bolted away from the family today.


Thanks Klaas. I couldn't find anything on what Red said but could find where it was discussed an awful lot.  I must have missed that post of Red's as lately I just skip over lots of pages and move on to the last couple pages to catch up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: SunnyinTX on November 23, 2008, 06:38:58 PM
Hi Monks...well I must say reading the last 15-20 posts was interesting...no information, but interesting....my sincere thanks to all of you who  keep this forum updated on any information...I read, but since I really have nothing to add to the work done here...I guess I am a lurker....but once again I read about people who SAY they know things they say they will reveal ...whenever..or they can't reveal....why in the heck even mention it IF it's true... ..::MonkeyWink:: been through that too many times. ::MonkeyNoNo:: Hopefully something will be revealed on Greta's show tomorrow night....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 06:39:02 PM
What if what the Froggy has was never posted on the Internet?




And where is what Kermit says Kyle shared with the FBI?

I need to go back and find where Kermit said that...Only reread Kyle's posts so far.

If Kyle holds the Copyright he has to give permission for them to be shown to whomever he shared them with, unless he has posted them himself on the internet, right?

If these were never posted, then permission is needed for another to post.

The question i posed earlier and i don't know if it was understood correctly was.Who's property are those photo's truly.

1.The owner of the persistence?
2.The owner of the equipment used for the video,and or images of the ROV?

What i'm trying to say is.If i let you borrow my camera to take a picture do you own the copywright or do i?The owner of the camera?Does this make any sense to anyone??Who had access to these photos,and or video??


Not sure who owns thm...I was just going on what Magnolia posted about Kyle's Copyright...But that may only be for those posted on the internet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:39:11 PM
O/T      mmmmmmm........SS  ::MonkeyEek:: The lady in your avy looks like Lizzy Borden  ::MonkeyShocked:: Is that an AX in her hand ready to chop up that turkey ?  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: KYcat on November 23, 2008, 06:39:30 PM
snipped>>>>>


Kermit, why would you be willing to post information that the FBI specifically asked not to be made public?


Because I know that that is a lie.
The evidence has or was NOT given to the FBI by him



texasmom comment:  maybe the "by him" is the key here; maybe somebody else gave it to the FBI and Kyle was contacted by the FBI about it?????

 ::MonkeyConfused::
[/quote]




Is this what Kermit has been referring to as the cover up?   ::MonkeyConfused::
[/quote]

I think this is what Kermit is referring to plus some other coverups.  But what do I know?!?!?

Not much.

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:40:37 PM
WHoooo        Issssss             Lockinggggg Upppppp ??

I CAN! ....... unless someone else wants to ...  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Keepthefaith on November 23, 2008, 06:41:50 PM
What if what the Froggy has was never posted on the Internet?




And where is what Kermit says Kyle shared with the FBI?

I need to go back and find where Kermit said that...Only reread Kyle's posts so far.

If Kyle holds the Copyright he has to give permission for them to be shown to whomever he shared them with, unless he has posted them himself on the internet, right?

If these were never posted, then permission is needed for another to post.

The question i posed earlier and i don't know if it was understood correctly was.Who's property are those photo's truly.

1.The owner of the persistence?
2.The owner of the equipment used for the video,and or images of the ROV?

What i'm trying to say is.If i let you borrow my camera to take a picture do you own the copywright or do i?The owner of the camera?Does this make any sense to anyone??Who had access to these photos,and or video??


Not sure who owns thm...I was just going on what Magnolia posted about Kyle's Copyright...But that may only be for those posted on the internet.

Thanx Mum.Would like to know the Chain of custody with the pictures,and or video.Who ultimately had the say with what did or didn't happen with this evidence if that's what we'll call it???Just questions...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: MumInOhio on November 23, 2008, 06:43:22 PM
Mum,
I was just thinking a little while ago, I am beginning to understand your advice to Johan earlier today.  I just wish I could take the advice myself and be content with it!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL...I relaxed in my den until I had enough of my team playing like a bunch of 2 year olds and I ran back to my computer...glad I did!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: texasmom on November 23, 2008, 06:46:05 PM
Mum,
I was just thinking a little while ago, I am beginning to understand your advice to Johan earlier today.  I just wish I could take the advice myself and be content with it!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL...I relaxed in my den until I had enough of my team playing like a bunch of 2 year olds and I ran back to my computer...glad I did!

I missed my team playing all together!  And they were actually winning last time I ran through!  I think they won, not sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 06:46:09 PM
O/T      mmmmmmm........SS  ::MonkeyEek:: The lady in your avy looks like Lizzy Borden  ::MonkeyShocked:: Is that an AX in her hand ready to chop up that turkey ?  ::MonkeyShocked::




 ::MonkeyDance::  No, I borrowed the dress from a costume company ad and stuck my monkey head on it.  The turkey was an after thought.  I don't think she has any hands - the dress is on a dress form, I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: SS on November 23, 2008, 06:48:41 PM
Nut......she's supposed to be a pilgrim.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:48:42 PM
O/T      mmmmmmm........SS  ::MonkeyEek:: The lady in your avy looks like Lizzy Borden  ::MonkeyShocked:: Is that an AX in her hand ready to chop up that turkey ?  ::MonkeyShocked::




 ::MonkeyDance::  No, I borrowed the dress from a costume company ad and stuck my monkey head on it.  The turkey was an after thought.  I don't think she has any hands - the dress is on a dress form, I think.

omg    ::MonkeyLaugh::  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Tamikosmom on November 23, 2008, 06:49:14 PM
This all brings back a lot of memories.
People who claim to know more than us poor dumb monkeys,
who have to exchange all of their information in private and
then go off and start their own private board..

Where is that board now?

It is hard for me to believe that if Beth knew Natalee was
found, she would not have shared that information with
people she knew cared.  If she did, shame on her.


I for one have been taken in by the frog and I believe by
Kyle as well.

Hi Magnolia

For 3 1/2 years Monkeys have upheld Beth Holloway's words and actions.  Has Beth ever given us any reason not to trust that her motives are to further the cause of justice for her daughter.

If the FBI does not want pertinent information regarding the case revealed ... then that information should not be revealed.  If the timing is deemed not right for Beth Holloway to share ... then trust Natalee's mother ... the timing is not right.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: San on November 23, 2008, 06:49:30 PM
WHoooo        Issssss             Lockinggggg Upppppp ??

I CAN! ....... unless someone else wants to ...  ::MonkeyWaa::

Go for it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:49:47 PM
Nut......she's supposed to be a pilgrim.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


I know  ::MonkeyHaHa:: lmao


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 06:50:19 PM

It is an open blog for reading therefore anything posted is open for all to copy and paste elsewhere. As long as you give credit for their picture etc.or a link.
A very wise wonam gave me this info, and I'm sticking to it.
::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:50:25 PM
WHoooo        Issssss             Lockinggggg Upppppp ??

I CAN! ....... unless someone else wants to ...  ::MonkeyWaa::

Go for it.


YAAAAAHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! ty


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: bastibro on November 23, 2008, 06:50:51 PM
Hi Monks...well I must say reading the last 15-20 posts was interesting...no information, but interesting....my sincere thanks to all of you who  keep this forum updated on any information...I read, but since I really have nothing to add to the work done here...I guess I am a lurker....but once again I read about people who SAY they know things they say they will reveal ...whenever..or they can't reveal....why in the heck even mention it IF it's true... ..::MonkeyWink:: been through that too many times. ::MonkeyNoNo:: Hopefully something will be revealed on Greta's show tomorrow night....

I agree for a 100% . . and praying for useable revelations on Greta tomorrow!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:56:31 PM
50


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:56:54 PM
 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
Post by: Kermit on November 23, 2008, 06:56:57 PM
Kermit,

You said something about being sued for copyright laws, is this about a movie deal?

No not from me. I don't want nor would I take any amount of money to expose the cover-up.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Blonde on November 23, 2008, 06:57:15 PM
Beth Holloway: Not knowing is-- is-- that's the daily torture.

Chris Hansen: What was it like for you to, once again, have a setback?

Dave Holloway: That's probably about the time that-- the chest pains intensified to an extreme. I mean, how many times can I take this?

Beth Holloway: You know, it's a disappointment. But, you have to look at the magnitude and the sacrifices being made even to get to that point.

And so her parents keep searching, hoping that somewhere off the coast of Aruba, a boat called the Persistence, may bring them an answer -- and peace.

Dave Holloway: If she's there, they'll find her. If they don't find her, we did-- we did the very best we could do, no question about it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/6/
 IMO it doesn't sound like she know's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 23, 2008, 06:57:57 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/MODLOCK1.gif)

>>> Natalee # 778

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: klaasend on November 23, 2008, 06:58:38 PM
WHoooo        Issssss             Lockinggggg Upppppp ??

I CAN! ....... unless someone else wants to ...  ::MonkeyWaa::

Go ahead, I'll watch  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru 11/23/08
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 23, 2008, 07:09:37 PM
WHoooo        Issssss             Lockinggggg Upppppp ??

I CAN! ....... unless someone else wants to ...  ::MonkeyWaa::


 ::MonkeyCool::  Do your thing, Nut.....I will help you get there....then I have to wash a few dishes... ::MonkeyRoll::