Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:21:25 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:21:25 PM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:37:36 PM
Me Me Me Me   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:37:38 PM
I promise to be nice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:38:06 PM
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:39:06 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


yep the very book the civil suit put the brakes on I believe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:40:01 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Do you seriously think he would publish that photo in a book? I think he has had his fill of bad press.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:40:53 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Maybe He'll Come To Your Town On His Book Signing Tour .....

After You Run Him Over.. Back Up Over Him Once For Me ....

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:41:27 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


yep the very book the civil suit put the brakes on I believe?


Well don't the think the thrown out civil suit is gonna put the brakes on anything.

This book was part of the expose by DeVries.

Also goes with JVDS/PVDS claims to reveal the 'real' truth at the appropriate time. Looks like the pic was to support a 'runaway' theory.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 08:41:49 PM
I have read a trans of the de Vries/Carlo interview.

Carlo admits the meeting...and the follow-up letter. He admits that he is aware of *rumors* about the meeting. He refuses to show de Vries the letter. The interview does not mention the specifics of the meeting or letter but those who have seen the video say that Carlo looks guilty as hell. And that is from Joran supporters.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:42:17 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Do you seriously think he would publish that photo in a book? I think he has had his fill of bad press.


The book was to be published in Holland....there hadn't been any bad press....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:43:33 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.

They were short on time and it was prior to the civil case.  Makes me think it was something Joran was going to use in the civil case, even though easily disproved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:43:39 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


yep the very book the civil suit put the brakes on I believe?


Well don't the think the thrown out civil suit is gonna put the brakes on anything.

This book was part of the expose by DeVries.

Also goes with JVDS/PVDS claims to reveal the 'real' truth at the appropriate time. Looks like the pic was to support a 'runaway' theory.


hmmm....
I'm getting an uneasy feeling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:44:12 PM
good to hear igsigs, looking forward to that sticking to Carlos like super glue then.....

thanks buckeye for clarifying, I'm not on top of Joran's book plans


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:44:26 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Do you seriously think he would publish that photo in a book? I think he has had his fill of bad press.


The book was to be published in Holland....there hadn't been any bad press....


It appears that the Sloots are as incredibly stupid as we have figured them to be.

They can say 'prove' us wrong that Nat isn't still alive and a runaway.

Prove the pic isn't real, until the expose by DeVries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 28, 2006, 08:45:00 PM
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:45:09 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Maybe He'll Come To Your Town On His Book Signing Tour .....

After You Run Him Over.. Back Up Over Him Once For Me ....

 8)

Me too.  Hi Widget.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:45:58 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Do you seriously think he would publish that photo in a book? I think he has had his fill of bad press.


The book was to be published in Holland....there hadn't been any bad press....


No I know, I just mean JVDS has had his fill of bad media attention , reports following him would he want to publish a photoshopped pic which I would think could be libelous if someone wanted to persue the case in court.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:46:56 PM
PVDS is not stupid. He is sly as a fox.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:47:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


Maybe He'll Come To Your Town On His Book Signing Tour .....

After You Run Him Over.. Back Up Over Him Once For Me ....

 8)

Me too.  Hi Widget.


Hi San .........

Hope All Is Well With You ...........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:47:04 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

it's ok


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:47:05 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


Hey Leslie, how much longer are you gonna be able to use 'Quebec, Canada' in your location instead of 'Quebec, Quebec'?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:48:06 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
PVDS is not stupid. He is sly as a fox.


Hi Memphis ......

I AGREE .............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:48:36 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


we know leslie, I actually could not believe she was calling you out of all people  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:48:52 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

SandraK is a fool.  Anyone that believes her is a fool.  She thrives on the attention.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 08:49:05 PM
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.
--------------------
Memphis - I couldn't agree more, Greta has always appeared obessessed with Taco.  She always let Joe Blow have the last word, even Jossy complained about that at one time. She's spineless is my opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:50:04 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


we know leslie, I actually could not believe she was calling you out of all people  :roll:


Hi None .............

Hit Her With A Slap Shot ..............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 28, 2006, 08:50:19 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

Hey Leslie, how much longer are you gonna be able to use 'Quebec, Canada' in your location instead of 'Quebec, Quebec'?

 :lol: You follow Canadian news!   We will become the Aruba of Canada :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:50:32 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.
--------------------
Memphis - I couldn't agree more, Greta has always appeared obessessed with Taco.  She always let Joe Blow have the last word, even Jossy complained about that at one time. She's spineless is my opinion.


It does appear that Greta's show may have problems, don't know how many folks she may have turned off with her position, but she has lost me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:51:37 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

Hey Leslie, how much longer are you gonna be able to use 'Quebec, Canada' in your location instead of 'Quebec, Quebec'?

 :lol: You follow Canadian news!   We will become the Aruba of Canada :lol:


Ah, I think that's pretty big news, and yes I do follow it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 08:51:52 PM
I hate to ask this, but how do you all do the quote thing. I'm sure it's simple but I just can't seem to figure it out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:52:23 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


we know leslie, I actually could not believe she was calling you out of all people  :roll:


Hi None .............

Hit Her With A Slap Shot ..............

 8)


Widget it would not be a fair fight, SandraK is missing serious gray matter

SandraK --> (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/word/coloreyes.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:52:47 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.
--------------------
Memphis - I couldn't agree more, Greta has always appeared obessessed with Taco.  She always let Joe Blow have the last word, even Jossy complained about that at one time. She's spineless is my opinion.


It does appear that Greta's show may have problems, don't know how many folks she may have turned off with her position, but she has lost me.


She Lost Me On Jorans Interview ..........

The Shittiest Piece Of Broadcasting Ever Seen .......

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:53:01 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

Hey Leslie, how much longer are you gonna be able to use 'Quebec, Canada' in your location instead of 'Quebec, Quebec'?

 :lol: You follow Canadian news!   We will become the Aruba of Canada :lol:


You aren't concerned at the slightest possiblity of armed conflict over the situation?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 08:53:21 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
PVDS is not stupid. He is sly as a fox.

Sometimes he is memphis.

The one Paulus soundbite we have from the de Vries show is him on the phone with de Vries implying that he is holding back info that might hurt people if he revealed it.

What is left out is the follow up by de Vries asking Paulus when he will be able to reveal it. Paulus says...when Natalee is found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:54:07 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I hate to ask this, but how do you all do the quote thing. I'm sure it's simple but I just can't seem to figure it out.


Look at the post you want to quote.  Just above the post is a BUTTON that says QUOTE.  All you have to do is click on that button and it will automatically take you to the reply screen with that post already quoted.  Hit enter once or twice and start typing your reply.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:54:28 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I hate to ask this, but how do you all do the quote thing. I'm sure it's simple but I just can't seem to figure it out.


I usually just hit the 'quote' button in the upper right corner of a post to reply instead of the 'post reply' button at the bottom.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:54:38 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I hate to ask this, but how do you all do the quote thing. I'm sure it's simple but I just can't seem to figure it out.


Click the quote button on upper right of the post you want to quote....then scroll down below last bracket and type your response.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 08:54:57 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


And just how stoooopid is that? Was it to "prove" Nat's alive? What a dumbass he is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:55:08 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I hate to ask this, but how do you all do the quote thing. I'm sure it's simple but I just can't seem to figure it out.

If you want to quote off a post hit the quote button in the upper right hand corner of the post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:55:31 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
PVDS is not stupid. He is sly as a fox.


Hi Memphis ......

I AGREE .............

 8)


Hi Widget!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:56:17 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

Hey Leslie, how much longer are you gonna be able to use 'Quebec, Canada' in your location instead of 'Quebec, Quebec'?

 :lol: You follow Canadian news!   We will become the Aruba of Canada :lol:


You aren't concerned at the slightest possiblity of armed conflict over the situation?

Lelsie and I are not going to duke it out . ( Car, I am in Central English ( sort of )Canada. )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:56:39 PM
IndyDan

You don't have to quote all of us that responded.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:57:17 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


And just how stoooopid is that? Was it to "prove" Nat's alive? What a dumbass he is.


Incredible isn't it? But at the moment that appears to be a viable theory of what they are up to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 08:58:24 PM
How stupid would a person have to be to photoshop himself into a pic that people are familiar with, and then try to convince those people it wasn't photoshopped. Is this just more proof that Joran is a few fries short of a Happy Meal?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:59:05 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


And just how stoooopid is that? Was it to "prove" Nat's alive? What a dumbass he is.


Incredible isn't it? But at the moment that appears to be a viable theory of what they are up to.


Well...something has Daniel all riled up...and the price was high....maybe to cover any tract??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:59:27 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
How stupid would a person have to be to photoshop himself into a pic that people are familiar with, and then try to convince those people it wasn't photoshopped. Is this just more proof that Joran is a few fries short of a Happy Meal?


DUMB & DUMBER ...............

Hi BT ..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 08:59:33 PM
It does appear that Greta's show may have problems, don't know how many folks she may have turned off with her position, but she has lost me.
-------------------
Carnut - when she said on her show after her softshoe interview with this teenaged rapist, that she was 'inclined to believe him'.  That spelled out to me that she was nothing more than a media whore. That one statement sold out Beth and Dave all for the hope that she might have exclusive exposure to this demented kid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:59:41 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
How stupid would a person have to be to photoshop himself into a pic that people are familiar with, and then try to convince those people it wasn't photoshopped. Is this just more proof that Joran is a few fries short of a Happy Meal?


Yep, as Anna said earlier that JVDS appears to be 'off the intelligence chart' at the bottom.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 09:00:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.

SandraK is a fool.  Anyone that believes her is a fool.  She thrives on the attention.


(http://marblies.net/e-store/sx-Jester.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:01:53 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
It does appear that Greta's show may have problems, don't know how many folks she may have turned off with her position, but she has lost me.
-------------------
Carnut - when she said on her show after her softshoe interview with this teenaged rapist, that she was 'inclined to believe him'.  That spelled out to me that she was nothing more than a media whore. That one statement sold out Beth and Dave all for the hope that she might have exclusive exposure to this demented kid.


And apparently she ain't all that objective in her view on things.

She may be just dumb, making a mistake like we all do sometimes or more sinisterly, may have sold out to someone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:04:37 PM
Heh, heh, I remember Greta's coverage of the 'runaway bride' episode made her look just a bit like some former Geraldo exposes'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 09:04:47 PM
Joran and the photoshopped pic isn't driven by any kind of normal behaviour, it's driven by a sickness none of us can comprehend.
This is not a normal kid feeling his oats and acting out, this is a socio-pyschopath that needs to be watched very closely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 09:06:18 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
How stupid would a person have to be to photoshop himself into a pic that people are familiar with, and then try to convince those people it wasn't photoshopped. Is this just more proof that Joran is a few fries short of a Happy Meal?


DUMB & DUMBER ...............

Hi BT ..........


Smoochies Widgey!  :D

Long time no see.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 28, 2006, 09:12:10 PM
Carnut:  The Province of Quebec is like a separate country already except that being part of Canada is financially imperative.  We have our own rule of law, income taxes, pension plan, language laws, etc.  Love my home - hate the politics.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:12:17 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.
--------------------
Memphis - I couldn't agree more, Greta has always appeared obessessed with Taco.  She always let Joe Blow have the last word, even Jossy complained about that at one time. She's spineless is my opinion.


Hi Indy.
It suddenly became crystal clear to me. She may even have the hots for him, don't know.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on November 28, 2006, 09:13:12 PM
SandraK's signature song:   :lol:

http://tinyurl.com/yyrabm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 09:16:32 PM
Even a duck with a brain the size of a pea is smarter. :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/MedleyQuack1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 09:16:46 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
SandraK's signature song:   :lol:

http://tinyurl.com/yyrabm


ROFL !!!!!  :lol:  :lol: her fave vacation vista  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:16:56 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "memphis"
PVDS is not stupid. He is sly as a fox.

Sometimes he is memphis.

The one Paulus soundbite we have from the de Vries show is him on the phone with de Vries implying that he is holding back info that might hurt people if he revealed it.

What is left out is the follow up by de Vries asking Paulus when he will be able to reveal it. Paulus says...when Natalee is found.


Hi igsigs!

See, this is what scares me. He has something up his sleeve. Look what he has done so far.

And I'll add that I really don't think Natalee or any of Natalee's belongings are buried anywhere on his property. They are long gone. I just don't believe he would ever risk that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 09:19:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Even a duck with a brain the size of a pea is smarter. :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/MedleyQuack1.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Do you think she can read that?  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:20:36 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Carnut:  The Province of Quebec is like a separate country already except that being part of Canada is financially imperative.  We have our own rule of law, income taxes, pension plan, language laws, etc.  Love my home - hate the politics.


Yeah, but some appear to be considering complete secession.

Quebec a nation within Canada (http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2676442)

Just wonder how the rest of 'Canada' will continue to live with that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 09:21:00 PM
people that follow the case could tell in a NEW YORK minute that
the photo was BULL CRAP


its the PEOPLE that have not followed the case

those are the people JORAN and EVIL CREW were going to try and HOODWINK


they are STUPID

JORAN and the EVIL CREW

the EVIL CREW consists of many

at the TOP of the list is

PAULUS

and KARIN

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 09:21:12 PM
When that photo was shopped, it wasn't widely seen.
For whatever reason it was done, all of the mutiple choices are sick.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 09:22:24 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
When that photo was shopped, it wasn't widely seen.
For whatever reason it was done, all of the mutiple choices are sick.


no it wasn't broadcast, it appeared at RU far as I can find, and only RU - you do the math

can you read that meds? quack !  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 09:22:59 PM
leslie, what was Joran's name ? the Ebay thing ?
And what is Kees email addy ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:23:33 PM
Either PVDS is blackmailing the establishment on the island or else he's a bigger kingpin in the islands criminal activities than he appears to be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:24:33 PM
Or those White Dutch on the island really do stick together.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:25:20 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
When that photo was shopped, it wasn't widely seen.
For whatever reason it was done, all of the mutiple choices are sick.


no it wasn't broadcast, it appeared at RU far as I can find, and only RU - you do the math

can you read that meds? quack !  8)


None, I'm not so good at math. Can you spell this out for me?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 09:26:38 PM
Memphis-

The photo was posted by Stinkypete at RU originally during his expose with WangChung on the answers lie in MB.

Quack is from meds herself, if you read FOB you'll understand  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 09:27:21 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


I have never met Sandra K and I often thought she was a teenager, rather wild and rambling, making up stuff as she went, trying her black poetry she copied from songs here, and then unbeknownst to SandraK, I saw a picture of her, in fact, several pictures of her.  Omiomiomi.  Not what I had expected at all and I was rather disappointed, because I was thinking young, vivacious blond, full of idealism and creativity, making up things as she goes, finding her way in the world and then  I saw this very matronly, slightly obtunded looking dreary person.  I do not believe she has a grip.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:28:21 PM
so...Joran got the picture from stinkypete?

I got the other part.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 09:31:03 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


What??  You mean you speak Papiamento and have been holding out on us all this time!!

J/k

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 09:32:05 PM
Tyler, in a word "jive-talkin"  :lol:  :lol:

Memphis, I do suspect either the photo was sent direct to Anita or Joran, or they were alerted to capture it from RU........anything to assist the delicious sporter right?  :wink:

everyone have a good night !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 09:33:59 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
[It does appear that Greta's show may have problems, don't know how many folks she may have turned off with her position, but she has lost me.


And about danged time, too, for you have been one of her last hold outs.  No question now as to where her loyalties lie.  And at the risk of offending some, I have to link some of her belief system to her participation in Scientology with its survival of the fittest mentality.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Frijole on November 28, 2006, 09:34:15 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


I have never met Sandra K and I often thought she was a teenager, rather wild and rambling, making up stuff as she went, trying her black poetry she copied from songs here, and then unbeknownst to SandraK, I saw a picture of her, in fact, several pictures of her.  Omiomiomi.  Not what I had expected at all and I was rather disappointed, because I was thinking young, vivacious blond, full of idealism and creativity, making up things as she goes, finding her way in the world and then  I saw this very matronly, slightly obtunded looking dreary person.  I do not believe she has a grip.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I am just sure that she dropped her boat drink and spilled it all over the cabana boy when she read that TG!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 09:34:37 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.
--------------------
Memphis - I couldn't agree more, Greta has always appeared obessessed with Taco.  She always let Joe Blow have the last word, even Jossy complained about that at one time. She's spineless is my opinion.


Turn the channel when the 8itch comes on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 09:35:16 PM
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 09:36:13 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Carnut"
I think I go along with the idea that the shopped pic was to show Nat and JVDS at New Years party this year.

Pretty sure from the way it was described be needed professionally and quickly that it's gonna be in a book by JVDS due in april.


And just how stoooopid is that? Was it to "prove" Nat's alive? What a dumbass he is.


How dumb is that?  Well, he is involved, after all, with MedleyRelay and SandraK.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 09:37:58 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Heh, heh, I remember Greta's coverage of the 'runaway bride' episode made her look just a bit like some former Geraldo exposes'.


Was it the "Runaway Bride" or "Nancy Pelosi?" :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 09:38:27 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:38:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


I have never met Sandra K and I often thought she was a teenager, rather wild and rambling, making up stuff as she went, trying her black poetry she copied from songs here, and then unbeknownst to SandraK, I saw a picture of her, in fact, several pictures of her.  Omiomiomi.  Not what I had expected at all and I was rather disappointed, because I was thinking young, vivacious blond, full of idealism and creativity, making up things as she goes, finding her way in the world and then  I saw this very matronly, slightly obtunded looking dreary person.  I do not believe she has a grip.


Humm, was one of those pics the parking/car lot with the family?

All the kids in the car business?

Or am I thinking of someone else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:38:49 PM
Tyler ~  :lol:  :lol: You've left me with quite an image.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 09:39:07 PM
Certain people need to LAY off the


Crack PIPE



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted: [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:39:45 PM
Goodnight None.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 09:41:52 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Heh, heh, I remember Greta's coverage of the 'runaway bride' episode made her look just a bit like some former Geraldo exposes'.


Was it the "Runaway Bride" or "Nancy Pelosi?" :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Nancy Pelosi? Unoh  you musta been watching a Greta I haven't seen.

Again, yes Anna I actually stopped watching Greta soon after the nightly coverage of Nat stopped. You might say I semi stopped even earlier because I would switch channels as soon as Joe T. would be introduced.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 09:42:23 PM
I think BETH may be on Greta again in a few minutes.  We need to check and see.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 09:42:27 PM
GRETA is a LOAD

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 09:42:34 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 09:42:46 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
I heard that I was being talked about by SandraK at FOB, so I went over and had a look-see.  Sandra seems to believe that I am Get-a-Grip and belong to secret forums - I am not and I don't.


I have never met Sandra K and I often thought she was a teenager, rather wild and rambling, making up stuff as she went, trying her black poetry she copied from songs here, and then unbeknownst to SandraK, I saw a picture of her, in fact, several pictures of her.  Omiomiomi.  Not what I had expected at all and I was rather disappointed, because I was thinking young, vivacious blond, full of idealism and creativity, making up things as she goes, finding her way in the world and then  I saw this very matronly, slightly obtunded looking dreary person.  I do not believe she has a grip.


Humm, was one of those pics the parking/car lot with the family?

All the kids in the car business?

Or am I thinking of someone else?


I was wondering the same thing.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 09:44:43 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:



LOL... me too ladies, my ex-husband once accused me of meeting a secret lover when I went on a weekend trip with my sister and neices due to the amount of underwear I had packed in my bag.... what a loser he was  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 09:45:28 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:



LOL... me too ladies, my ex-husband once accused me of meeting a secret lover when I went on a weekend trip with my sister and neices due to the amount of underwear I had packed in my bag.... what a loser he was  :roll:




 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 09:45:45 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:


Tyler! We must be related! I always got that same warning too. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 09:45:58 PM
If you can stand it, turn on GRETA in a couple minutes.  I think Beth will be on again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 28, 2006, 09:48:41 PM
Kat_Gram:  I am not saying this is Joran's eBay account
http://tinyurl.com/yauavm
but the name King Dingiling is what interested me, because of the spelling and the fact that Freddy entitled a picture of Joran that.  I suppose anyone who calls himself King Dingiling is going to be buying soft handcuffs, a phony doctor's outfit, etc.

Carnut:  We always have the referendum in Quebec asking if we want to remain in Canada while the rest of the country holds it's breath.  Even though the only people allowed to make that decision are residents of the province and not all the land owners (many people who live in other provinces who still have family homes here) the majority votes to stay in Canada.  If the vote were nationwide; Quebec would be independant -so fast - as the rest of Canada is fed up with our complaints and issues.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 09:49:57 PM
Widgey, I you are still here am sending out a big hug to those precious girls! Glad to see you on here and glad to hear that all is going well!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 09:51:00 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Widgey, I you are still here am sending out a big hug to those precious girls! Glad to see you on here and glad to hear that all is going well!!!




ooopsie....If you are still here..... :oops:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 09:51:20 PM
I always just stuff as much stuff like that as I can in the bag.
I went thru customs one time and the nice man asked what I bought when I was away . Just underwear ! He says ? Yes !  I said just underwear ! Wanna see it ?
I got waved thru.
I was going to go in the suitcase and show him, but he was too shy  !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 10:00:34 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Heh, heh, I remember Greta's coverage of the 'runaway bride' episode made her look just a bit like some former Geraldo exposes'.


Was it the "Runaway Bride" or "Nancy Pelosi?" :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Nancy Pelosi? Unoh  you musta been watching a Greta I haven't seen.

Again, yes Anna I actually stopped watching Greta soon after the nightly coverage of Nat stopped. You might say I semi stopped even earlier because I would switch channels as soon as Joe T. would be introduced.


No, Nancy Pelosi looks like the "Runaway Bride," with the big eyes!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 10:02:56 PM
No, Carnut, the pictures I saw were not from the Internet.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:04:08 PM
I didn't get home from work tonight until 8:15, so I'm trying to catch the local weather forecast instead of watching Greta. Do we know yet if Beth is on? TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 10:08:15 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I didn't get home from work tonight until 8:15, so I'm trying to catch the local weather forecast instead of watching Greta. Do we know yet if Beth is on? TY

If she's going to be on it will probably be at the end of the show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 10:09:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I didn't get home from work tonight until 8:15, so I'm trying to catch the local weather forecast instead of watching Greta. Do we know yet if Beth is on? TY

If she's going to be on it will probably be at the end of the show.


Greta just said coming up next after the break - Taco Joe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 10:09:16 PM
Joe Tacopina will be on Greta next after commercial.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 28, 2006, 10:10:10 PM
I cannot watch Greta anymore after her lacklustre telephone interview with Peter de Vries and then the remote with Beth Twitty.  I don't like the way her mind works or the way her mouth hardly moves or the monotone voice plus she asks stupid questions.  I had to chuckle when Greta said to Beth "Nice to see you" and Beth paused ...  smiled  and said 'Hi, Greta".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 10:14:03 PM
Well, I am going to barf....Joe Taco is on Greta.... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 10:14:25 PM
Joe spoke to Paulus and Joran and they said there was absolutely no meeting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:15:50 PM
ON THE RECORD
11-28-06


J Tacopino:

This statement is a false fact....it's unfortunate, you have a guy here who is trying to capatalize on a tragedy...this stunning revelation....Antonio Carlo said he did not have a meeting, and the only meeting he had with her is one that he made clear that he did not think joran should be held. I have been thru every page, if there was such a stunning admission we would have heard of it by now.
Earlie today I spoke with carlo, paulus and joran...

These notes he allegedly took, they were never produced, it is unbelievable this guy. he is not subject to the laws of the united states.

He is trying to cash in..

G:what was carlos reaction when he heard of this?

Joe:  He is an experienced and well respected lawyer in aruba. the notion that he would run to the prosecutor......

It is a flat out lie by the dutch reporter to make money and to give false hopes once again...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:17:07 PM
told ya

great sucks  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 10:17:13 PM
What a crock!!!  I can't believe Greta.  That's it!  I will no longer watch her under any circumstances....where is that barfdoll?   :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:18:09 PM
greta sleeps with FISH HEAD


er ahh uhh i mean JOE TACO

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
What a crock!!!  I can't believe Greta.  That's it!  I will no longer watch her under any circumstances....where is that barfdoll?   :x


Yeah, I do wonder how her position has affected her ratings.

Haven't really been looking at such things of late.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:19:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
What a crock!!!  I can't believe Greta.  That's it!  I will no longer watch her under any circumstances....where is that barfdoll?   :x


It sounds like I'm lucky I decided to watch the local weather forecast instead of Greta.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 10:19:41 PM
OK, am I missing something?

We are supposed to believe that Carlo and Janssen did not say this happened because Tacopina says it didn't???

Its just that same hard investigative journalism Greta that has allowed you to solve the disappearance of Natalee.

What a joke ... Hey Greta ... Tacopina speaking for Carlo ...

WOULD NOT THAT BE HERESAY?

Hint ... thats a legal term :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:19:42 PM
Quote from: "robots"
greta sleeps with FISH HEAD


er ahh uhh i mean JOE TACO

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Fish Heads Fish Heads...roli poli fish heads..
Fish heads, fish heads...eat them up, yum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 10:21:45 PM
Does appear that Greta is really working hard to avoid any hard pointed questions or followup responses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 10:22:13 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoeTacoBell.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 10:24:02 PM
QUESTION TO GRETA AND HER PRODUCERS

Wouldn't the proper way to answer this to be to ask Antonio Carlo himself?

Or Karen Janssen herself?

Next thing Joe Tacopina will be answering Red's questions.


BTW Joe T. ... talking about libel and slander. You were doing a right fine job yourself tonight with the name calling of De Vries.

Joes just mad that he was in Rome and the Pope made a b-line out of town to Turkey.

So Joe, trip to Rome ... is it business or pleasure?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 10:24:42 PM
All I can say is I hope Beth refuses to come on Greta ever again...there are others that will let her on their show...Beth doesn't owe Greta anything.  I despise turncoats... :x  :x  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 10:26:42 PM
L'il Joey Is Full o' Beans

He didn't ask sloot about Antonio Carlo.

He asked why the goon is photoshopping pix of himself and Natalee.  And I guarantee you Taco did NOT get a straight answer.

C'mon, those "FAUXTOGRAPHS" make joran look and appear like a perverted sociopath.  That's great news for a lawyer defending a primary suspect in a high profile murder case.

And besides -- how would the sloots know if Carlo approached Jannsen in June, 2005; do we really think Carlo would tell the sloots?  Of course not.
Gawd, how painfully obvious.

Hey, Joey -- the Pope is in Turkey, he doesn't need or want anything to do with a lying, two-faced, barely competent lawyer -- like you.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:26:48 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
All I can say is I hope Beth refuses to come on Greta ever again...there are others that will let her on their show...Beth doesn't owe Greta anything.  I despise turncoats... :x  :x  :x


I don't think Beth goes on Greta cause she feels she owes her anything.
i just think she will use every avenue she can to keep this story alive, even if it means going on her show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 10:28:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoeTacoBell.jpg)


Great pic Klaas, But I think his face on a jackass would be more fitting


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 10:30:43 PM
So lets understand this.

Way back when Greta has a lovefest with Joe T when the civil case got thrown out. Greta makes the comment that they all should go down to Aruba and solve this case. Like either of these two would do anything for free.

Peter de Vries, a respected criminal reporter does go to Aruba and attempts to do the right thing. Like it or not hate sites, all stated prior to de vries doing this NH case, he was a well respected investigator.

So de vries does his job and those that don't like what he says call him names.

How lame and typical is this? If you can't attack the message ... attack the messenger.

So what's your deal Greta? Jealous? Can't atand that someone would actually try and help a family for free and solve this case that does not meet your agenda?

How very sad that you would as a journalist, try and slant a story to meet your agenda.

Do us all a favor and go back to CNN where you obviously belong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:31:23 PM
hey JOE TACO

where is the VIDEO of Natalee ?? you know the one in the lobby after she
got back from the beach ????????

hUH ??????

greta, you slug why dont you ask him that ??

GRETA, you are as BAD as TOILET


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 10:33:17 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
All I can say is I hope Beth refuses to come on Greta ever again...there are others that will let her on their show...Beth doesn't owe Greta anything.  I despise turncoats... :x  :x  :x


I don't think Beth goes on Greta cause she feels she owes her anything.
i just think she will use every avenue she can to keep this story alive, even if it means going on her show.


I know Beth is doing anything she can to find her child and I would certainly do the same.  I am just so darn tired of Greta kicking Beth every chance she gets.  Maybe I am being too harsh, but sorry folks, that is how I feel.  Beth has done nothing to deserve this kind of treatment.  Her daughter was murdered and for the life of me I don't understand how Greta can act the way she does.  It's just so hard to watch this...I am going to find me a new avatar...I will be better when I return...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:34:25 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
All I can say is I hope Beth refuses to come on Greta ever again...there are others that will let her on their show...Beth doesn't owe Greta anything.  I despise turncoats... :x  :x  :x


I don't think Beth goes on Greta cause she feels she owes her anything.
i just think she will use every avenue she can to keep this story alive, even if it means going on her show.


I know Beth is doing anything she can to find her child and I would certainly do the same.  I am just so darn tired of Greta kicking Beth every chance she gets.  Maybe I am being too harsh, but sorry folks, that is how I feel.  Beth has done nothing to deserve this kind of treatment.  Her daughter was murdered and for the life of me I don't understand how Greta can act the way she does.  It's just so hard to watch this...I am going to find me a new avatar...I will be better when I return...


Oh I understand where you are coming from...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:35:02 PM
GRETA

all is NOT FORGOTTEN

go out to dinner with the SLUG JOE

maybe you can rub footsies with each other

maybe GRETA IS MEDLEY


Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww GROSS me out  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 10:35:11 PM
CARLO: An Experienced, Well-Respected Lawyer...

Indeed.

Quite troubling this "experienced, well-respected lawyer" decided to approach the prosecution with an admission of guilt on behalf of his socio-pathic client...NO?

Didn't De Vries say confirmations would not be found in the written record, in effect?  And why did brave Antonio run away like a school child when confronted with information re: the meeting w/ Jannsen?

Let's not talk about the FAUXTOGRAPHY -- OK?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 10:35:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoeTacoBell.jpg)




 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 10:35:47 PM
Joe T.

Other people have seen the material too ,,, BTW

What happened to the hotel video tape?
What happened to the hotel room key story?
Why did your client pay to fauxtoshop a picture with NH?
What did the original search warrant state?
Do you want to finally state for the record that the VDS premises was not searched?

Oh and by the way, come on Greta ... you got the info regarding pics and comments of JVDS last night and today. Why no questions?

Does it not fit your agenda?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:35:49 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I know Beth is doing anything she can to find her child and I would certainly do the same.  I am just so darn tired of Greta kicking Beth every chance she gets.  Maybe I am being too harsh, but sorry folks, that is how I feel.  Beth has done nothing to deserve this kind of treatment.  Her daughter was murdered and for the life of me I don't understand how Greta can act the way she does.  It's just so hard to watch this...I am going to find me a new avatar...I will be better when I return...


Yes, it's pretty obvious that Greta has an agenda of her own that doesn't have anything to do with assisting Beth in solving the murder of her child. (And I still think that Greta has the hots for Joran  :roll: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 10:37:22 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
All I can say is I hope Beth refuses to come on Greta ever again...there are others that will let her on their show...Beth doesn't owe Greta anything.  I despise turncoats... :x  :x  :x


I don't think Beth goes on Greta cause she feels she owes her anything.
i just think she will use every avenue she can to keep this story alive, even if it means going on her show.


I know Beth is doing anything she can to find her child and I would certainly do the same.  I am just so darn tired of Greta kicking Beth every chance she gets.  Maybe I am being too harsh, but sorry folks, that is how I feel.  Beth has done nothing to deserve this kind of treatment.  Her daughter was murdered and for the life of me I don't understand how Greta can act the way she does.  It's just so hard to watch this...I am going to find me a new avatar...I will be better when I return...


Oh I understand where you are coming from...




What a crock.....Greta really does suck......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:38:54 PM
8)  8)  8)  8)


Results 1 - 10 of about 15,600 for Greta van susteren sucks. (0.13 seconds)

she really does show her true colors

gosh what a slug


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 10:40:29 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:


Hi Monkeys.  I'm still reading to catch up, but this just cracked me up!  About a year ago we took my 22 year old daughter and her girlfriend to Las Vegas for a family reunion trip for a long weekend.  The girls bunked in with my hubby and I, and there were clothes everywhere!!!  These girls brought a large suitcase each in addition to makeup cases and other sundry bags of goodies.  When they hit the room to dress for the evening, clothes went flying in every which way as they tried on and discarded about a dozen outfits.  After I finished laughing, and they left for the big evening at the club, dolled to the nines, I proceeded to sort the clothes and put them back in the cases.  I counted 26 (twenty-six!) pairs of bikini panties that my own daughter had packed!!!   :roll:   I asked her the next day why she brought so many panties for a 3 night trip.  She said she didn't count them--she just scooped up a handful from her dresser drawer and dumped them in the suitcase!!!  I didn't know she owned that many panties.   :lol:   We did have a good time that weekend laughing at those girls who saw the big city for the first time.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:40:42 PM
you know what i think
Greta is MAD that Beth mentioned Scaredmonkeys.com


you know what else i think
Greta reads here


you know what else i think
GRETA has lost her soul


you know what else i think
im inclined to believe that GRETA SUCKS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:40:58 PM
Quote from: "robots"
GRETA

all is NOT FORGOTTEN

go out to dinner with the SLUG JOE

maybe you can rub footsies with each other

maybe GRETA IS MEDLEY


Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww GROSS me out  :twisted:


O robots...........yucccccccccccccccccccck


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:41:45 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
GRETA

all is NOT FORGOTTEN

go out to dinner with the SLUG JOE

maybe you can rub footsies with each other

maybe GRETA IS MEDLEY


Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww GROSS me out  :twisted:


O robots...........yucccccccccccccccccccck


sowwwwwwwyyy,,

i lost it for a moment  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 10:44:34 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
[Fish Heads Fish Heads...roli poli fish heads..
Fish heads, fish heads...eat them up, yum.


 :shock:
One of my kids once sang that for three solid days.  He was only about three or four and we never knew why he was doing it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:44:49 PM
ok, so here is the million dollar question

is GRETA trying to seduce JORAN, PAULUS or JOE T. ?????


cause its the only thing that makes sense



im beginning to hate GRETA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 10:45:06 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
CARLO: An Experienced, Well-Respected Lawyer...

Indeed.

Quite troubling this "experienced, well-respected lawyer" decided to approach the prosecution with an admission of guilt on behalf of his socio-pathic client...NO?

Didn't De Vries say confirmations would not be found in the written record, in effect?  And why did brave Antonio run away like a school child when confronted with information re: the meeting w/ Jannsen?

Let's not talk about the FAUXTOGRAPHY -- OK?.



I think Joe T said it was impossible for a lawyer to have a conscience.

Speak for yourself.

This is actually comical. The entire time this case have gone on in Aruba ... nothing whether it be ALE, searches, investigation, tips, judges, official, media ... etc has been done in a standard normal manner. Aruba is the side of a small town with a population of a small city.

Everybody knows everybody and everything ... hell Joe T said that.

Now Joe T. things that the legal profession in Aruba is some how like it is in the USA. What would prevent the legal system from being different as well where a lawyer may know that his client was guilty as sin and what he should do for the betterment of Aruba vs. his client?

Seems that maybe Carlo knew something that we have been stating for 18 months ...

What's good for Joran Van der Sloot ... is terrible for Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:45:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
[Fish Heads Fish Heads...roli poli fish heads..
Fish heads, fish heads...eat them up, yum.


 :shock:
One of my kids once sang that for three solid days.  He was only about three or four and we never knew why he was doing it.

.




LOL

la la la la

LA LA LA LA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:46:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
[Fish Heads Fish Heads...roli poli fish heads..
Fish heads, fish heads...eat them up, yum.


 :shock:
One of my kids once sang that for three solid days.  He was only about three or four and we never knew why he was doing it.

.


THere was a video of it too, long time ago in the beginning of MTV...LOL
It stuck in my head too!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:49:27 PM
because WE dont undersatand the SYSTEM in TOILET ISLAND 8)

pehaps it is certainly reasonable and possible for a DEFENSE ATTY to go to a prosecutor and say what they want to say about a client

remember we do not UNDERSTAND their system
 :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


in their system you can LIE, tell 18 different stories and spend a few weeks in JAIL, tell more LIES and all is forgotten  :roll:



my money goes with Devries

i wouldnt bet any money on the JOE the LOAD doing anything ethical

EVER


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 10:49:39 PM
http://www.totse.com/en/ego/can_you_dance_to_it/fisheads.html

For Anna.......... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 10:50:11 PM
We just MUST get that photoshopped photo into the MSM some way.  It is more telling than a thousand words, etc.

If I can figure out a way to post it to Drudge report, I will.  He just has that little box to send tips.  I will send tip to email me for copies of the pictures.

Others please send to Nancy Grace, Hannity, etc. and see if we can't get this photo before the public and let them form their own opinion about Joran and what he is up to and his state of mind.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 10:51:02 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
What a crock!!!  I can't believe Greta.  That's it!  I will no longer watch her under any circumstances....where is that barfdoll?   :x


Yeah, I do wonder how her position has affected her ratings.

Haven't really been looking at such things of late.


I told you way back a long time ago, the day would come when you'd hate her so.  I hear you whining but I told you back then.  I hear you complaining, tell her go to back to CNN.  I heard her lying a long time ago, I knew the time would come when she would get paid by Taco.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 10:51:38 PM
Great idea, Anna...Maybe NE would publish it on the cover of their rag  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Klaas, I'm looking for my Christmas avatar but can't find it? Can you spruce me up for the holidays???? TIA!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 10:52:51 PM
And, furthermore, why in the world is anyone now interviewing Joe Taco about anything to do with Natalee's disappearance?  He was Joran's lawyer in the NY civil suit.  That suit was dismissed.  It's over.  Is Joe Taco licensed to work in Aruba?  Is he defending Joran in the murder and kidnapping charges?  NO, we know he's not.  He is no more than a bystander and a bag of hot air now.  Anything he says is speculation, no more.  He needs to keep his mouth shut and let Joran's lawyer talk, if anyone talks.  Who is Joran's lawyer, by the way?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 10:53:43 PM
Quote from: "Red"
So lets understand this.

Way back when Greta has a lovefest with Joe T when the civil case got thrown out. Greta makes the comment that they all should go down to Aruba and solve this case. Like either of these two would do anything for free.

Peter de Vries, a respected criminal reporter does go to Aruba and attempts to do the right thing. Like it or not hate sites, all stated prior to de vries doing this NH case, he was a well respected investigator.

So de vries does his job and those that don't like what he says call him names.

How lame and typical is this? If you can't attack the message ... attack the messenger.

So what's your deal Greta? Jealous? Can't atand that someone would actually try and help a family for free and solve this case that does not meet your agenda?

How very sad that you would as a journalist, try and slant a story to meet your agenda.

Do us all a favor and go back to CNN where you obviously belong.


Watch BOR and tell him about the picture and the Taco connection.  He hates Greta and the feeling is mutual.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:53:45 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
And, furthermore, why in the world is anyone now interviewing Joe Taco about anything to do with Natalee's disappearance?  He was Joran's lawyer in the NY civil suit.  That suit was dismissed.  It's over.  Is Joe Taco licensed to work in Aruba?  Is he defending Joran in the murder and kidnapping charges?  NO, we know he's not.  He is no more than a bystander and a bag of hot air now.  Anything he says is speculation, no more.  He needs to keep his mouth shut and let Joran's lawyer talk, if anyone talks.  Who is Joran's lawyer, by the way?


i think its GRETA  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 10:54:43 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
And, furthermore, why in the world is anyone now interviewing Joe Taco about anything to do with Natalee's disappearance?  He was Joran's lawyer in the NY civil suit.  That suit was dismissed.  It's over.  Is Joe Taco licensed to work in Aruba?  Is he defending Joran in the murder and kidnapping charges?  NO, we know he's not.  He is no more than a bystander and a bag of hot air now.  Anything he says is speculation, no more.  He needs to keep his mouth shut and let Joran's lawyer talk, if anyone talks.  Who is Joran's lawyer, by the way?


Who told me that Greta went to visit the Sloots without Beth and made the connection between the sloots and Joe Taco. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 28, 2006, 10:56:10 PM
TYLER...

At what point do you think Greta began to "turn"? When she interviewed Joran, or earlier?

For that matter, do you think she has EVER REALLY been in Beth's corner at all?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 10:56:24 PM
Tacopina : Two-Faced Bullsh!t

*********************************

Red says: "Joe T.  Other people have seen the material too, BTW

What happened to the hotel video tape?
What happened to the hotel room key story?
Why did your client pay to fauxtoshop a picture with NH?
What did the original search warrant state?
Do you want to finally state for the record that the VDS premises was not searched?

Oh and by the way, come on Greta ... you got the info regarding pics and comments of JVDS last night and today. Why no questions?

Does it not fit your agenda?

************************************

Red, this is "Front Page" material.

And monkeys should send copies to Greta's producers and Bill O'Reilly.

It's obvious to me that Tacopina demanded "equal time" to refrain from defamation lawsuit VS the network for all of the previous favorable HT coverage.  The lawyers told Greta to even it out, right or wrong.

Put it on the FP and e-mail it to the producers (forget Greta) -- let's hear what these losers have to say.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 10:58:16 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Tacopina : Two-Faced Bullsh!t

*********************************

Red says: "Joe T.  Other people have seen the material too, BTW

What happened to the hotel video tape?
What happened to the hotel room key story?
Why did your client pay to fauxtoshop a picture with NH?
What did the original search warrant state?
Do you want to finally state for the record that the VDS premises was not searched?

Oh and by the way, come on Greta ... you got the info regarding pics and comments of JVDS last night and today. Why no questions?

Does it not fit your agenda?

************************************

Red, this is "Front Page" material.

And monkeys should send copies to Greta's producers and Bill O'Reilly.

It's obvious to me that Tacopina demanded "equal time" to refrain from defamation lawsuit VS the network for all of the previous favorable HT coverage.  The lawyers told Greta to even it out, right or wrong.

Put it on the FP and e-mail it to the producers (forget Greta) -- let's hear what these losers have to say.

.



hammer is RIGHT on the MONEY

GRETA'S  show should be

" On the TACO"

 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 28, 2006, 10:58:23 PM
I just saw your post directly above mine. Wow.  :shock:  

I understand what you are implying.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:01:14 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
And, furthermore, why in the world is anyone now interviewing Joe Taco about anything to do with Natalee's disappearance?  He was Joran's lawyer in the NY civil suit.  That suit was dismissed.  It's over.  Is Joe Taco licensed to work in Aruba?  Is he defending Joran in the murder and kidnapping charges?  NO, we know he's not.  He is no more than a bystander and a bag of hot air now.  Anything he says is speculation, no more.  He needs to keep his mouth shut and let Joran's lawyer talk, if anyone talks.  Who is Joran's lawyer, by the way?


Exactly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 11:01:18 PM
Didn't Greta turn on Beth when Beth went into the
internet cafw where Deepak works WITHOUT Greta ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:02:55 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Didn't Greta turn on Beth when Beth went into the
internet cafw where Deepak works WITHOUT Greta ?


Don't know if she turned, but it was obvious she was put off a bit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 11:03:29 PM
Quote from: "sb"
TYLER...

At what point do you think Greta began to "turn"? When she interviewed Joran, or earlier?

For that matter, do you think she has EVER REALLY been in Beth's corner at all?

Greta is in Greta's corner, nothing more nothing less.  She plays one against the other.  It's all about ratings.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 11:04:26 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
http://www.totse.com/en/ego/can_you_dance_to_it/fisheads.html

For Anna.......... :wink:


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 28, 2006, 11:07:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "sb"
TYLER...

At what point do you think Greta began to "turn"? When she interviewed Joran, or earlier?

For that matter, do you think she has EVER REALLY been in Beth's corner at all?

Greta is in Greta's corner, nothing more nothing less.  She plays one against the other.  It's all about ratings.


Klaas, I think it's more complicated than that. Cynicism I understand. Duplicity I do not.

If Greta set the VDS up with taco-boy, she is HARDLY a "fair and balanced" reporter of fact, she is an active agent in the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 11:08:40 PM
Oh and by the way Joe T. had also stated in the past that the VDS property was searched.

However, this afternoon he admitted that it was not.

Every sand in Aruba was searched according to Joe ... Yup Joe it was. Every sand except that of the VDS property and all residences. You know, the likely place where there may have been finger prints, DNA, etc.

One final question Joe ... you handling the Imette St Guillen case like this as well?

Let's just search Darly Littlejohn's bedroom ... the hell with the rest of the house and basement.

What do you say Joe T? Consistency baby. What's good for one case is good for the other don't ya think?

Yea .. there may be a post in all of this ...

A TALE OF TWO TACOPINA'S


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 11:10:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[Who told me that Greta went to visit the Sloots without Beth and made the connection between the sloots and Joe Taco. :wink:


Greta said several times she had met the Sloots and they were a LOVELY FAMILY.   :evil:  So I guess she did.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 28, 2006, 11:10:49 PM
taco-boy is representing something bigger than Joran. He is representing the iceberg that VDS is only the tip of.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 11:11:06 PM
Just to reminisce ... who can forget this masterpiece done by Vanderbilt?

(http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/tacotamer_small.jpg)

Joe Tacopina Meets “The No Spin Zone” and Crumbles

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/03/14/joe-tacopina-meets-the-no-spin-zone-and-crumbles/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 11:13:13 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Oh and by the way Joe T. had also stated in the past that the VDS property was searched.

However, this afternoon he admitted that it was not.

Every sand in Aruba was searched according to Joe ... Yup Joe it was. Every sand except that of the VDS property and all residences. You know, the likely place where there may have been finger prints, DNA, etc.

One final question Joe ... you handling the Imette St Guillen case like this as well?

Let's just search Darly Littlejohn's bedroom ... the hell with the rest of the house and basement.

What do you say Joe T? Consistency baby. What's good for one case is good for the other don't ya think?

Yea .. there may be a post in all of this ...

A TALE OF TWO TACOPINA'S


And be sure to avoid any drains, under carpets and grain of wood, underneath screws and bolts, etc.  It's for darn sure none of that was done at the Sloots because there wasn't time for anything except a basic walk through.

Oh, they did go into the main house but just to pick up Anita's camera and the computer, etc. specific items.  No looking around, now!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:13:18 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[Who told me that Greta went to visit the Sloots without Beth and made the connection between the sloots and Joe Taco. :wink:


Greta said several times she had met the Sloots and they were a LOVELY FAMILY.   :evil:  So I guess she did.

.


Yes, do remember Greta saying that more than once.

It does appear she believes that.

Either Greta cannot see bad in anyone or she's pretty much a dolt, or both.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 11:15:45 PM
my vote is DOLT

and evil one at that


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 11:16:06 PM
But Tocapina insists Imette's mom Maureen St. Guillen isn't in it for the money, and says the family's main aim was to "pursue legislative change, so that Imette doesn't die in vain."

"It's our position that the owners [of the Falls] are certainly culpable," Tacopina said, without naming names. "They hired somebody who has a felony record and put a predator into the mix. Then they violated the law again when they didn't come clean with the police, and gave false and misleading statements," Tacopina added, referring to Daniel Dorrian. "That to me is an even bigger offense."


http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/powerplays/archives/002629.php

this is how joe see's it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 11:16:13 PM
Quote from: "sb"
taco-boy is representing something bigger than Joran. He is representing the iceberg that VDS is only the tip of.


You hit the nail on the head sb . Joe is simply networking.....he is insuring himself a possible wealth of clients in the future. Many of these clients likely from NY, or  FL  and with last names that end in "O" ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 11:16:54 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[Who told me that Greta went to visit the Sloots without Beth and made the connection between the sloots and Joe Taco. :wink:


Greta said several times she had met the Sloots and they were a LOVELY FAMILY.   :evil:  So I guess she did.

.


Yes, do remember Greta saying that more than once.

It does appear she believes that.

Either Greta cannot see bad in anyone or she's pretty much a dolt, or both.



Or she is cut from the same cloth as they are and doesn't want Joran to have his life disrupted any further by all of this.  After all, they are all such nice folks and it doesn't bring Natalee back to have Joran's life disrupted, too, does it??  

She is just as evil as those she defends, Carnut.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 28, 2006, 11:16:55 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Oh and by the way Joe T. had also stated in the past that the VDS property was searched.

However, this afternoon he admitted that it was not.

Every sand in Aruba was searched according to Joe ... Yup Joe it was. Every sand except that of the VDS property and all residences. You know, the likely place where there may have been finger prints, DNA, etc.

One final question Joe ... you handling the Imette St Guillen case like this as well?

Let's just search Darly Littlejohn's bedroom ... the hell with the rest of the house and basement.

What do you say Joe T? Consistency baby. What's good for one case is good for the other don't ya think?

Yea .. there may be a post in all of this ...

A TALE OF TWO TACOPINA'S


We have to face the obvious where Joe Taco is concerned.  He is engaging in "lawyer's capitalism".  No matter what your client is guilty of, get him off and get your big payday.  Even if you have to out and out lie.  Make a name for yourself and get that big payday.  Greta is no better than Taco Boy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 11:19:19 PM
Greta Tacopina

or

Greta Van der slooooooooooot


or maybe even

Greta Kalpoe  


 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 11:20:21 PM
Imette St Guillen Case

NYPD blowtorched the plumbing out of Littlejohn's home for forensic examination.  They ripped up the floorboards, tore out the walls and sheetrock.

Of course they confiscated all the linens and laundry, all the plumbing traps, all the clothing -- everything.  

NYPD knew this was the guy, and they were gonna nail him.  And they did.

What happened at 19 Montana?

Just askin'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 11:21:22 PM
how do JOE and Greta sleep at night ????

i bet they see GHOSTS


 :shock:  :shock:


 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:22:20 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I just saw your post directly above mine. Wow.  :shock:  

I understand what you are implying.


 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:24:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
What a crock!!!  I can't believe Greta.  That's it!  I will no longer watch her under any circumstances....where is that barfdoll?   :x


Yeah, I do wonder how her position has affected her ratings.

Haven't really been looking at such things of late.


I told you way back a long time ago, the day would come when you'd hate her so.  I hear you whining but I told you back then.  I hear you complaining, tell her go to back to CNN.  I heard her lying a long time ago, I knew the time would come when she would get paid by Taco.


 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: lexie on November 28, 2006, 11:25:11 PM
Hi, all.

Guess deVries has rattled more cages, I see Taco is back.  Why on earth would we believe there was no meeting on the word of Paulus and Joran... two of the three biggest liars in Aruba!  We know paul told several conflicting stories in his PVs... Joran told ?how many? lies in his; Anita went on national tv swearing that the whole house was "tossed" three times.  Joe has told us about Joran, the honor student, just rrying to continue his education in NL, and how he was working there when we were seeing photos of him on Cool Aruba....

What a bunch!  I will not watch Greta, either.  Her attitude toward Beth last night showed no feeling whatsoever for what the family has gone through.  Her parting comments seemed almost condescending..."maybe someone can help your family".  

I just hope that deVries continues his investigation, and brings out a few more revelations.  It seems that the program has turned many heads in the NL.  That has to be a good thing.  Just wish there was some MSM here that would take up the cause, and keep this in the news.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 28, 2006, 11:25:52 PM
Hey Memphis,

I've been looking over the Shango/Simian posts today.  Any chance Carlo was the "bird on the wire" that eventually flew away?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 28, 2006, 11:26:00 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "sb"
taco-boy is representing something bigger than Joran. He is representing the iceberg that VDS is only the tip of.


You hit the nail on the head sb . Joe is simply networking.....he is insuring himself a possible wealth of clients in the future. Many of these clients likely from NY, or  FL  and with last names that end in "O" ?


Well, this is not exactly right.  I doubt vowels have anything to do with it.  Imette & Joran's names end in consonants, so maybe I'm missing the point....and yes, I'm behind many pages, but this just raised the hair on the back of my neck a bit.  My Dad, I'm sure would back me, God love him in his present state.  

This should not be considered a support message for Joe T, by any means, btw....by no means, absolutely, not.  Just don't want a lot of good people who are not involved sucked into the pit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 11:26:04 PM
Quote from: "sb"
taco-boy is representing something bigger than Joran. He is representing the iceberg that VDS is only the tip of.


BINGO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 11:28:12 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
But Tocapina insists Imette's mom Maureen St. Guillen isn't in it for the money, and says the family's main aim was to "pursue legislative change, so that Imette doesn't die in vain."

"It's our position that the owners [of the Falls] are certainly culpable," Tacopina said, without naming names. "They hired somebody who has a felony record and put a predator into the mix. Then they violated the law again when they didn't come clean with the police, and gave false and misleading statements," Tacopina added, referring to Daniel Dorrian. "That to me is an even bigger offense."


http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/powerplays/archives/002629.php

this is how joe see's it


The similarities are just amazing in the two cases and Tacopina manages to take the exact opposite side in both cases.

So the family is not in it for the money? Are you Joe? Or is this case pro bono too?

While you are at it stating that De Vries is only in it for the money ... maybe Joe T. would like to tell everyone how much he was paid to be JVDS attorney and Aruba's continued mouth piece?

What say you Joe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 11:31:21 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Imette St Guillen Case

NYPD blowtorched the plumbing out of Littlejohn's home for forensic examination.  They ripped up the floorboards, tore out the walls and sheetrock.

Of course they confiscated all the linens and laundry, all the plumbing traps, all the clothing -- everything.  

NYPD knew this was the guy, and they were gonna nail him.  And they did.

What happened at 19 Montana?

Just askin'.


They starred at the front door from a distance.

To be honest with you all, I came closer to the inside of the VDS home than the ALE and the people who mattered.

Another case to think about ... Teresa Halback ... Murdered by Steve Avery at the Avery Salvage Yard.

Imagine if they only said search one shed ... no body, no car, etc would have ever been found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 11:31:45 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "Sue"
But Tocapina insists Imette's mom Maureen St. Guillen isn't in it for the money, and says the family's main aim was to "pursue legislative change, so that Imette doesn't die in vain."

"It's our position that the owners [of the Falls] are certainly culpable," Tacopina said, without naming names. "They hired somebody who has a felony record and put a predator into the mix. Then they violated the law again when they didn't come clean with the police, and gave false and misleading statements," Tacopina added, referring to Daniel Dorrian. "That to me is an even bigger offense."


http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/powerplays/archives/002629.php

this is how joe see's it


The similarities are just amazing in the two cases and Tacopina manages to take the exact opposite side in both cases.

So the family is not in it for the money? Are you Joe? Or is this case pro bono too?

While you are at it stating that De Vries is only in it for the money ... maybe Joe T. would like to tell everyone how much he was paid to be JVDS attorney and Aruba's continued mouth piece?

What say you Joe?


When this article came out I sent that to Greta pointing out the same stuff in each case talk about the pot calling the kettle black


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:35:24 PM
Cudos to Red and Klaasend for essentially keeping all this alive and providing DeVries with the support he needed and for continuing to provide a place for the real caring Dutch to read the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 11:36:20 PM
Greta = Pussy Whipped

She has allowed the network's lawyers to direct her coverage of the NH case.

Tacopina was hired to defend the civil action AND to shut down the news reporting.  He did so by demanding "equal time" vs defamation suit threat for previous months of "favorable" HT Family coverage and sympathies.

That's what this is about --

Greta has no cajones (in more ways than one).  Both she and Fox have caved on this case because they are afraid of a lawsuit.

I say the Fox lawyers get paid to defend objective journalism.  Get off your lazy asses and do some lawyering -- and get the reporters in the field so they can INVESTIGATE cases.  Especially newsworthy cases like the abduction, rape and murder of an American teenaged girl in Aruba by Joran van der Sloot.

A crime that was covered up by Aruban authorities at the behest of joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot.

If you can't do your job, then step aside.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:37:55 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Red"
Oh and by the way Joe T. had also stated in the past that the VDS property was searched.

However, this afternoon he admitted that it was not.

Every sand in Aruba was searched according to Joe ... Yup Joe it was. Every sand except that of the VDS property and all residences. You know, the likely place where there may have been finger prints, DNA, etc.

One final question Joe ... you handling the Imette St Guillen case like this as well?

Let's just search Darly Littlejohn's bedroom ... the hell with the rest of the house and basement.

What do you say Joe T? Consistency baby. What's good for one case is good for the other don't ya think?

Yea .. there may be a post in all of this ...

A TALE OF TWO TACOPINA'S


We have to face the obvious where Joe Taco is concerned.  He is engaging in "lawyer's capitalism".  No matter what your client is guilty of, get him off and get your big payday.  Even if you have to out and out lie.  Make a name for yourself and get that big payday.  Greta is no better than Taco Boy.


But, as someone already stated, Joe T. is not Joran's lawyer. The civil case was thrown out. He is obviously doing damage control for Joran in the US. Why?

Step back and look at this. Joe T. came out swinging. He really tryed to paint Beth in a certain unfavorable light. He's doing some serious damage control.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 11:40:22 PM
I'm back.  Did anyone miss me?  I feel better now, I am in the Christmas Spirit...maybe Rudolph will poop in the Sloots yard this year. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:41:46 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Greta = Pussy Whipped

She has allowed the network's lawyers to direct her coverage of the NH case.

Tacopina was hired to defend the civil action AND to shut down the news reporting.  He did so by demanding "equal time" vs defamation suit threat for previous months of "favorable" HT Family coverage and sympathies.

That's what this is about --


Greta has no cajones (in more ways than one).  Both she and Fox have caved on this case because they are afraid of a lawsuit.

I say the Fox lawyers get paid to defend objective journalism.  Get off your lazy asses and do some lawyering -- and get the reporters in the field so they can INVESTIGATE cases.  Especially newsworthy cases like the abduction, rape and murder of an American teenaged girl in Aruba by Joran van der Sloot.

A crime that was covered up by Aruban authorities at the behest of joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot.

If you can't do your job, then step aside.

.


I didn't see this before I posted

Hammer says it better than me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:42:48 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"

We have to face the obvious where Joe Taco is concerned.  He is engaging in "lawyer's capitalism".  No matter what your client is guilty of, get him off and get your big payday.  Even if you have to out and out lie.  Make a name for yourself and get that big payday.  Greta is no better than Taco Boy.


But, as someone already stated, Joe T. is not Joran's lawyer. The civil case was thrown out. He is obviously doing damage control for Joran in the US. Why?

Step back and look at this. Joe T. came out swinging. He really tryed to paint Beth in a certain unfavorable light. He's doing some serious damage control.


It's kinda obvious Joe T. is functioning as a media defense for the entire aruban Dutch establishment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 28, 2006, 11:44:07 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I'm back.  Did anyone miss me?  I feel better now, I am in the Christmas Spirit...maybe Rudolph will poop in the Sloots yard this year. :roll:


Rudolph should have a sleigh full of poop to unload...wish it was on dvd, Lala's.  

Guess I might not be the one to say so, but I have to say that blanket statements regarding the final vowel in one's name does not sit well, here.  My Dad taught me that, and he taught me well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 11:47:06 PM
I can't believe I am spending my second Christmas with you guys.  I love you all, but I would be happier if Natalee was home with her family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 28, 2006, 11:47:11 PM
Hey Monkeys...
Just making a post & go ... Kinda

Still trying to get my mind straight for  civil participation...

I probably should not say this (SM mg mt. please feel  free to delete)
I recently managed to shock myself on the typical 12 volt ignition / spark plug system.. of my car (dumb I know)

But it also brought back  a memory of being shocked by a 24 volt aircraft ignition system.   The sock from the 24 volt system knocked me flat for several minutes the sensation was not a pleasant at all.

For those that  have never experienced being shocked by your automobiles  spark plug / coil wires... or even your lawn mower.. all I can say is  IT normally very short and NOT a nice feeling.

I do apologize for my rant .. and do NOT advocate shock treatment on  anyone for any reason...
BUT... sometimes my mind does not want to listen to my  heart or hearts

Sorry again for the rant

Keep the faith
SeeeeYaaaBYeeee
Oldf


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:48:07 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Hey Memphis,

I've been looking over the Shango/Simian posts today.  Any chance Carlo was the "bird on the wire" that eventually flew away?


truthseeker! Hi!  :D

I meant to say hi at the end of my other post.

That is very interesting. Run that past Lala's.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:48:54 PM
Heh, heh, just watching the end of 'Apocalypse Now Redux' and caught Col Kurtz final writings in his bible.

'Drop The Bomb, Exterminate them All!'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 11:50:17 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys...
Just making a post & go ... Kinda

Still trying to get my mind straight for  civil participation...

I probably should not say this (SM mg mt. please feel  free to delete)
I recently managed to shock myself on the typical 12 volt ignition / spark plug system.. of my car (dumb I know)

But it also brought back  a memory of being shocked by a 24 volt aircraft ignition system.   The sock from the 24 volt system knocked me flat for several minutes the sensation was not a pleasant at all.

For those that  have never experienced being shocked by your automobiles  spark plug / coil wires... or even your lawn mower.. all I can say is  IT normally very short and NOT a nice feeling.

I do apologize for my rant .. and do NOT advocate shock treatment on  anyone for any reason...
BUT... sometimes my mind does not want to listen to my  heart or hearts

Sorry again for the rant

Keep the faith
SeeeeYaaaBYeeee
Oldf

Sorry you got shocked Oldfart...and I think I get your drift  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 28, 2006, 11:50:19 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Hey Memphis,

I've been looking over the Shango/Simian posts today.  Any chance Carlo was the "bird on the wire" that eventually flew away?


truthseeker! Hi!  :D

I meant to say hi at the end of my other post.

That is very interesting. Run that past Lala's.  :lol:


Do we know exactly when Carlo got spooked about his meeting with Janssen?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:04 pm
The wire has been shaken. The bird has left.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 11:51:50 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys...
Just making a post & go ... Kinda

Still trying to get my mind straight for  civil participation...

I probably should not say this (SM mg mt. please feel  free to delete)
I recently managed to shock myself on the typical 12 volt ignition / spark plug system.. of my car (dumb I know)

But it also brought back  a memory of being shocked by a 24 volt aircraft ignition system.   The sock from the 24 volt system knocked me flat for several minutes the sensation was not a pleasant at all.

For those that  have never experienced being shocked by your automobiles  spark plug / coil wires... or even your lawn mower.. all I can say is  IT normally very short and NOT a nice feeling.

I do apologize for my rant .. and do NOT advocate shock treatment on  anyone for any reason...
BUT... sometimes my mind does not want to listen to my  heart or hearts

Sorry again for the rant

Keep the faith
SeeeeYaaaBYeeee
Oldf


As  Blah said earlier, the case would be solved in a couple of hrs if the FBI were allowed to interrogate the 3 perps.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 11:52:28 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "sb"
taco-boy is representing something bigger than Joran. He is representing the iceberg that VDS is only the tip of.


You hit the nail on the head sb . Joe is simply networking.....he is insuring himself a possible wealth of clients in the future. Many of these clients likely from NY, or  FL  and with last names that end in "O" ?


Well, this is not exactly right.  I doubt vowels have anything to do with it.  Imette & Joran's names end in consonants, so maybe I'm missing the point....and yes, I'm behind many pages, but this just raised the hair on the back of my neck a bit.  My Dad, I'm sure would back me, God love him in his present state.  

This should not be considered a support message for Joe T, by any means, btw....by no means, absolutely, not.  Just don't want a lot of good people who are not involved sucked into the pit.


I am not sure what you are thinking I had said. So rather than beat around the bush I will say that what I meant was since Taco Joe seems to have a penchant for glitzy, high-profile , cases  ( Joe T  is the lawyer of record  for the Gotti family)and now as lawyer for the JVDS( his family have rumored   mafia connections in Aruba ) Joe T is furthering his reputation as a  lawyer  who has experience in defending  cases involving mafia and underworld  type.  This is the" tip of the iceberg the VDS represent as sb aptly put it. "
Please relaxe the hairs on the back of your neck ........but yes many of those involved in underworld organizations are Italian, and also Russian, and also Venezuelan, etc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:53:29 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"

We have to face the obvious where Joe Taco is concerned.  He is engaging in "lawyer's capitalism".  No matter what your client is guilty of, get him off and get your big payday.  Even if you have to out and out lie.  Make a name for yourself and get that big payday.  Greta is no better than Taco Boy.


But, as someone already stated, Joe T. is not Joran's lawyer. The civil case was thrown out. He is obviously doing damage control for Joran in the US. Why?

Step back and look at this. Joe T. came out swinging. He really tryed to paint Beth in a certain unfavorable light. He's doing some serious damage control.


It's kinda obvious Joe T. is functioning as a media defense for the entire aruban Dutch establishment.


 :oops:  yes it is


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 11:53:55 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Cudos to Red and Klaasend for essentially keeping all this alive and providing DeVries with the support he needed and for continuing to provide a place for the real caring Dutch to read the truth.


It certainly gets obvious when one rattles the cages and hits close to home. Out comes a stuttering Tacopina live from Italy. Wonder if Joe's fee goes up on a time zone contingency?

Who should be angry? All the level headed Dutch people who watch and follow Peter de Vries and have always considered him respectful and professional.

Kind of funny Tacopina sputtering that de Vries could be sued for libel when it was Tacopina calling all the names and making desparaging accusations.

BTW Joe ... Carlo can sue de Vries if he choses, they are both part of the Dutch Kingdom.

The answer is that he won't ... wonder why? Maybe because what de Vries said was the truth?

So why didn't we hear the statement from Carlo rather than Joe that it was a lie. maybe because Joe has absolutely no standing what-so-ever in this case ... ya think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 11:55:04 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Hey Memphis,

I've been looking over the Shango/Simian posts today.  Any chance Carlo was the "bird on the wire" that eventually flew away?


truthseeker! Hi!  :D

I meant to say hi at the end of my other post.

That is very interesting. Run that past Lala's.  :lol:


Shall we dance?  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on November 28, 2006, 11:57:47 PM
I can't get the FP to load. Is it just me?
Hello monkeys. Great job on covering the program Sunday.
Gotta go read back while I watch the Laker game :wink:
Oh and in case you were wondering, I am going crazy over this whole Mike Shula thing. I don't have any hair left :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 11:58:48 PM
Maybe DeVries will come on Dana's show and we can ask him about all this stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 11:59:05 PM
It loads OK for me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: jobie on November 28, 2006, 11:59:12 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

The photo was posted by Stinkypete at RU originally during his expose with WangChung on the answers lie in MB.

Quack is from meds herself, if you read FOB you'll understand  :wink:


What is fob?  Or can you say on here?  I think a very dark and twisted mind came up with that photoshoped picture.  Joran lives in a dark world I would not care to visit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 11:59:41 PM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
I can't get the FP to load. Is it just me?
Hello monkeys. Great job on covering the program Sunday.
Gotta go read back while I watch the Laker game :wink:
Oh and in case you were wondering, I am going crazy over this whole Mike Shula thing. I don't have any hair left :evil:



It's gonna be okay...deep breath now... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 29, 2006, 12:02:21 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Hey Memphis,

I've been looking over the Shango/Simian posts today.  Any chance Carlo was the "bird on the wire" that eventually flew away?


truthseeker! Hi!  :D

I meant to say hi at the end of my other post.

That is very interesting. Run that past Lala's.  :lol:


Shall we dance?  :D


Could Carlo be Shango or Simian trying to ease his conscience?  Now that would really be something!

Shango posted sometime around June 25 thru June 30.  I think Simian posted from June 17 thru June 30.  Does that sound right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on November 29, 2006, 12:03:00 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
I can't get the FP to load. Is it just me?
Hello monkeys. Great job on covering the program Sunday.
Gotta go read back while I watch the Laker game :wink:
Oh and in case you were wondering, I am going crazy over this whole Mike Shula thing. I don't have any hair left :evil:



It's gonna be okay...deep breath now... :wink:

I'm trying to focus on the Bball team.  They are 5-0!! :D

I just tried the FP again and it said page not found.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:03:50 AM
About Shango... I would tend to think that Carlo knew early on about Joran.  Maybe he was shocked at what really happened and he just couldn't keep the secret any longer.  Usually the conscience feels guilt early in the process and after some time the guilt fades into the background.  Then it doesn't seem to hurt as much...especially after you are paid a large sum of money to keep your mouth shut...not that I am saying that happened...just thinking out loud.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 12:03:54 AM
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

The photo was posted by Stinkypete at RU originally during his expose with WangChung on the answers lie in MB.

Quack is from meds herself, if you read FOB you'll understand  :wink:


What is fob?  Or can you say on here?  I think a very dark and twisted mind came up with that photoshoped picture.  Joran lives in a dark world I would not care to visit.


Hi jobie. Freedom of Blog.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 12:04:12 AM
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

The photo was posted by Stinkypete at RU originally during his expose with WangChung on the answers lie in MB.

Quack is from meds herself, if you read FOB you'll understand  :wink:


What is fob?  Or can you say on here?  I think a very dark and twisted mind came up with that photoshoped picture.  Joran lives in a dark world I would not care to visit.

FOB - Freedom of Blog a forum full of Joran worshipers and apologists.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: jobie on November 29, 2006, 12:04:43 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:


Remember the undies that had each day of the week embrodied on them?  I was so afraid of being in a wreck on Sat. and going to the hospital with Wed. on my drawers.  The thing nightmares are made of.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 12:05:27 AM
Could Jansen be leaking this contact by Joran's attorney knowing such contact is illegal in order to get the case thrown out on the basis of inadequate counsel for Joran/

Was No Body/No Case originally from KJ to Paulus since she has tried one such case before in the NL?  Did he consult her or was she in attendance at the infamous meeting around the Sloot pool?

I have just always wondered those things.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: jobie on November 29, 2006, 12:05:36 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

The photo was posted by Stinkypete at RU originally during his expose with WangChung on the answers lie in MB.

Quack is from meds herself, if you read FOB you'll understand  :wink:


What is fob?  Or can you say on here?  I think a very dark and twisted mind came up with that photoshoped picture.  Joran lives in a dark world I would not care to visit.

FOB - Freedom of Blog a forum full of Joran worshipers and apologists.


Thanks, Klaas


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 12:05:49 AM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Hey Memphis,

I've been looking over the Shango/Simian posts today.  Any chance Carlo was the "bird on the wire" that eventually flew away?


truthseeker! Hi!  :D

I meant to say hi at the end of my other post.

That is very interesting. Run that past Lala's.  :lol:


Shall we dance?  :D


Could Carlo be Shango or Simian trying to ease his conscience?  Now that would really be something!

Shango posted sometime around June 25 thru June 30.  I think Simian posted from June 17 thru June 30.  Does that sound right?


truthseeker, that same thought crossed my mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 29, 2006, 12:06:01 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "oldfart"
<<snip>>


As  Blah said earlier, the case would be solved in a couple of hrs if the FBI were allowed to interrogate the 3 perps.

Carnut

If John Doe was allowed to ask & record ?'s  in the 1st 48 hrs things we would NOT be here.
Do you happen to know what the average voltage output of 12v ignition coil is and how it compares to a tasser/tazzer ? Just wondering...
 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: jobie on November 29, 2006, 12:06:25 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

The photo was posted by Stinkypete at RU originally during his expose with WangChung on the answers lie in MB.

Quack is from meds herself, if you read FOB you'll understand  :wink:


What is fob?  Or can you say on here?  I think a very dark and twisted mind came up with that photoshoped picture.  Joran lives in a dark world I would not care to visit.


Hi jobie. Freedom of Blog.


Hi Memphis - thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 29, 2006, 12:08:46 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"

Could Carlo be Shango or Simian trying to ease his conscience?  Now that would really be something!

Shango posted sometime around June 25 thru June 30.  I think Simian posted from June 17 thru June 30.  Does that sound right?


truthseeker, that same thought crossed my mind.


Like minds I guess.  Or, maybe it's the warm weather we are having around here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 12:09:09 AM
I wonder if De Vries even knows what Joe T. called him today?  Maybe someone should let him know.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 12:09:48 AM
Lala's - you look adorable and so does Klaas.

OldFart - I didn't get the cryptic message, and I like cryptic. I must be tired.

truthseeker - I'll leave you and Lala's to do the Shango Tango.


Nite everyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 29, 2006, 12:12:37 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Lala's - you look adorable and so does Klaas.

OldFart - I didn't get the cryptic message, and I like cryptic. I must be tired.

truthseeker - I'll leave you and Lala's to do the Shango Tango.


Nite everyone.


I'm headed to bed myself.  I want to be fully alert for my work and lurk mode tomorrow.

'Nite.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 12:13:04 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
[Fish Heads Fish Heads...roli poli fish heads..
Fish heads, fish heads...eat them up, yum.


 :shock:
One of my kids once sang that for three solid days.  He was only about three or four and we never knew why he was doing it.

.


That's wild, Anna.   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:13:05 AM
Feel free to borrow these at any time!


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/gretaegg.gif)

and (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/footsteps.gif)  SO.... (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/runjoran.gif)

I''m still thinking on one for Joe T, any suggestions?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 29, 2006, 12:14:15 AM
LaLa's
I luv the new Avatar ... but will Klassend be called upon (again) to ENHANCE &  find out what is being wrtten on that list  OR are you going to inform us (running update of course) :wink:  
OR is it a Chistmas List or just a Holliday scribe of yours :shock:  :roll:
(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/dodie_photos/wishmous.gif)

SYB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 29, 2006, 12:14:37 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Feel free to borrow these at any time!


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/gretaegg.gif)

and (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/footsteps.gif)  SO.... (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/runjoran.gif)

I''m still thinking on one for Joe T, any suggestions?


How about "I only get an oil change every 30,000 words"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:15:12 AM
too funny truthseeker, if I can fit it onto the generator you got it !  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 12:16:23 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "oldfart"
<<snip>>


As  Blah said earlier, the case would be solved in a couple of hrs if the FBI were allowed to interrogate the 3 perps.

Carnut

If John Doe was allowed to ask & record ?'s  in the 1st 48 hrs things we would NOT be here.
Do you happen to know what the average voltage output of 12v ignition coil is and how it compares to a tasser/tazzer ? Just wondering...
 :wink:


Ask {b]Klaas [/b] she'll know  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: jobie on November 29, 2006, 12:17:11 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoeTacoBell.jpg)


Great pic Klaas, But I think his face on a jackass would be more fitting


And the opposite end!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 12:17:27 AM
Quote from: "sb"
TYLER...

At what point do you think Greta began to "turn"? When she interviewed Joran, or earlier?

For that matter, do you think she has EVER REALLY been in Beth's corner at all?


I think she wanted a story but knowing her politics, I am surprised she even stuck with Beth that long.  She is not one to stroke the truth.  I was so pleasantly surprised that she was helping Beth and then she did not shock me when she turned against Beth.  She likes to deal with people who admire her, who are losers,  who she can turn into winners, which fits with her agenda.  She pretends not to be a capitalist, like Joe, but they (those who embrace socialism) are the biggest and baddest capitalists of them all, and not necessarily entrepreneurs but as I like to say, "capitalist pigs" and not necessarily good old American capitalists.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 12:20:09 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "oldfart"
<<snip>>


As  Blah said earlier, the case would be solved in a couple of hrs if the FBI were allowed to interrogate the 3 perps.

Carnut

If John Doe was allowed to ask & record ?'s  in the 1st 48 hrs things we would NOT be here.
Do you happen to know what the average voltage output of 12v ignition coil is and how it compares to a tasser/tazzer ? Just wondering...
 :wink:


Well, I have done the dance on occasion myself.

Heck auto coils will run from 25,000 volts to 50,000 volts for super hot competition coils.

I've jumped to both kinds.

As Ralphy got a certain appreciation for various soap bars, I've enjoyed a variety of automotive ignitions.

I've seen stun gun ads of 625,000 to 775,000 volts.

Favorite electrician joke:

It's not the volts that get you, it's the amps. ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on November 29, 2006, 12:21:37 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Feel free to borrow these at any time!


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/gretaegg.gif)

and (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/footsteps.gif)  SO.... (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/runjoran.gif)

I''m still thinking on one for Joe T, any suggestions?



 8)  8)  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 12:22:14 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Feel free to borrow these at any time!


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/gretaegg.gif)

and (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/footsteps.gif)  SO.... (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/runjoran.gif)

I''m still thinking on one for Joe T, any suggestions?


How 'bout, " TOO BIG TO FLUSH!"?

Hi everybody! I Just got home.........do I need to go catch up? Last update I had was a brief ( Thank God ) appearance on Fox by Tacky about 1:00 this afternoon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 29, 2006, 12:23:07 AM
Ooops :oops:
Forgot this link to to a Windows play list that sometimes helps me keep my hear of heat on top of things & why I want to come back here

http://www.erickaharvey.com/playlist.wpl

Paste the address in Windows Medial Player -- Open URL -- option  address
JMO of course

G'NIte for sure
SYB
OldF


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on November 29, 2006, 12:25:22 AM
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoeTacoBell.jpg)


Great pic Klaas, But I think his face on a jackass would be more fitting


And the opposite end!


ROFLMAO!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:26:06 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
LaLa's
I luv the new Avatar ... but will Klassend be called upon (again) to ENHANCE &  find out what is being wrtten on that list  OR are you going to inform us (running update of course) :wink:  
OR is it a Chistmas List or just a Holliday scribe of yours :shock:  :roll:
(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/dodie_photos/wishmous.gif)

SYB



Are you worried that your name could be on MY list?  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 12:26:27 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
But Tocapina insists Imette's mom Maureen St. Guillen isn't in it for the money, and says the family's main aim was to "pursue legislative change, so that Imette doesn't die in vain."

"It's our position that the owners [of the Falls] are certainly culpable," Tacopina said, without naming names. "They hired somebody who has a felony record and put a predator into the mix. Then they violated the law again when they didn't come clean with the police, and gave false and misleading statements," Tacopina added, referring to Daniel Dorrian. "That to me is an even bigger offense."


http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/powerplays/archives/002629.php

this is how joe see's it


No, I agree Maureen is not in it for the money; Joe is in it to take her money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 12:28:11 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The stupidist thing I ever read over there was whne they counted how much underwear Natalee brought to Aruba with her. That was 'proof"
of the intent to run away. The only flaw in their arguement was that, the underwear was still in Aruba !  But they didn't get that far. Instead, they discussed how much undies a normal person would pack for a four day trip. LOL :lol:  :lol:


I would love to see them analyze my packing methods. I'm so lazy about packing that I don't even bother to count things. I just do a load of laundry and throw all the undies in the suitcase straight out of the dryer. I could end up on a 4 day trip with 12 pairs of underwear.  :lol:


BT, I always pack at least that many pairs for four days!  I might not have that many changes of clothing, but I want my unders to be clean, should I have a wreck or die or something.  My grandmother warned me about dying with dirty underwear on and now I am obsessed about that. :lol:  :lol:


Hi Monkeys.  I'm still reading to catch up, but this just cracked me up!  About a year ago we took my 22 year old daughter and her girlfriend to Las Vegas for a family reunion trip for a long weekend.  The girls bunked in with my hubby and I, and there were clothes everywhere!!!  These girls brought a large suitcase each in addition to makeup cases and other sundry bags of goodies.  When they hit the room to dress for the evening, clothes went flying in every which way as they tried on and discarded about a dozen outfits.  After I finished laughing, and they left for the big evening at the club, dolled to the nines, I proceeded to sort the clothes and put them back in the cases.  I counted 26 (twenty-six!) pairs of bikini panties that my own daughter had packed!!!   :roll:   I asked her the next day why she brought so many panties for a 3 night trip.  She said she didn't count them--she just scooped up a handful from her dresser drawer and dumped them in the suitcase!!!  I didn't know she owned that many panties.   :lol:   We did have a good time that weekend laughing at those girls who saw the big city for the first time.   :shock:


AZLady, I remember going on vacation as a teenager, and taking everything I owned, and maybe even a cashmere sweater or two in case I met someone who wanted me to stay for the winter (at the beach, LOLOLOL).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 12:28:59 AM
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:29:12 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Feel free to borrow these at any time!


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/gretaegg.gif)

and (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/footsteps.gif)  SO.... (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/runjoran.gif)

I''m still thinking on one for Joe T, any suggestions?


How 'bout, " TOO BIG TO FLUSH!"?

Hi everybody! I Just got home.........do I need to go catch up? Last update I had was a brief ( Thank God ) appearance on Fox by Tacky about 1:00 this afternoon.


Taco Joe has mad all us monkeys mad, but I think the real rage is directed in Greta's direction at the moment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 29, 2006, 12:29:56 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "oldfart"
<<snip>>


As  Blah said earlier, the case would be solved in a couple of hrs if the FBI were allowed to interrogate the 3 perps.

Carnut

If John Doe was allowed to ask & record ?'s  in the 1st 48 hrs things we would NOT be here.
Do you happen to know what the average voltage output of 12v ignition coil is and how it compares to a tasser/tazzer ? Just wondering...
 :wink:


Well, I have done the dance on occasion myself.

Heck auto coils will run from 25,000 volts to 50,000 volts for super hot competition coils.

I've jumped to both kinds.

As Ralphy got a certain appreciation for various soap bars, I've enjoyed a variety of automotive ignitions.

I've seen stun gun ads of 625,000 to 775,000 volts.

Favorite electrician joke:

It's not the volts that get you, it's the amps. ;)


It is NOT a Joke   ... AMPS kill not volts

Dad had a transformer from a Neon sign that would shoot a spark 3"
and if hooked to a pencil would do wood carvings/burnigs..
It was prodcuing something like 5 amps..
Rattle fillings & burn but not a heart stopper ~~  Normally
SYB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 29, 2006, 12:32:04 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "oldfart"
LaLa's
I luv the new Avatar ... but will Klassend be called upon (again) to ENHANCE &  find out what is being wrtten on that list  OR are you going to inform us (running update of course) :wink:  
OR is it a Chistmas List or just a Holliday scribe of yours :shock:  :roll:
(http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j178/dodie_photos/wishmous.gif)

SYB



Are you worried that your name could be on MY list?  :roll:


I KNOW I am... but not sure which side of the LIST  :wink:  :roll:
SYB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:32:52 AM
Hi Nonesy.  Winkies to you.  :wink:  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 12:35:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Feel free to borrow these at any time!


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/gretaegg.gif)

and (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/footsteps.gif)  SO.... (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/runjoran.gif)

I''m still thinking on one for Joe T, any suggestions?


How 'bout, " TOO BIG TO FLUSH!"?

Hi everybody! I Just got home.........do I need to go catch up? Last update I had was a brief ( Thank God ) appearance on Fox by Tacky about 1:00 this afternoon.


Taco Joe has mad all us monkeys mad, but I think the real rage is directed in Greta's direction at the moment.


Thank you for responding, Lala's! So, the case was covered on Greta tonight, I assume? I'll catch the repeat. Is that all the "food" for rage there is since this afternoon? TIA!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 12:36:09 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "sb"
taco-boy is representing something bigger than Joran. He is representing the iceberg that VDS is only the tip of.


You hit the nail on the head sb . Joe is simply networking.....he is insuring himself a possible wealth of clients in the future. Many of these clients likely from NY, or  FL  and with last names that end in "O" ?


Well, this is not exactly right.  I doubt vowels have anything to do with it.  Imette & Joran's names end in consonants, so maybe I'm missing the point....and yes, I'm behind many pages, but this just raised the hair on the back of my neck a bit.  My Dad, I'm sure would back me, God love him in his present state.  

This should not be considered a support message for Joe T, by any means, btw....by no means, absolutely, not.  Just don't want a lot of good people who are not involved sucked into the pit.


I am not sure what you are thinking I had said. So rather than beat around the bush I will say that what I meant was since Taco Joe seems to have a penchant for glitzy, high-profile , cases  ( Joe T  is the lawyer of record  for the Gotti family)and now as lawyer for the JVDS( his family have rumored   mafia connections in Aruba ) Joe T is furthering his reputation as a  lawyer  who has experience in defending  cases involving mafia and underworld  type.  This is the" tip of the iceberg the VDS represent as sb aptly put it. "
Please relaxe the hairs on the back of your neck ........but yes many of those involved in underworld organizations are Italian, and also Russian, and also Venezuelan, etc


Hell, let's just call a spade, a spade.  He is connected to Posner.  Greta is not going to buck that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 12:38:01 AM
BTW, Lala's.............I LUV the avatar! It's cute and cuddly!
Good thinking too! Check that list carefully before Santa checks it twice to find out who's naughty and nice!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:38:31 AM
Go Tylergal!!!!!!!  Yep, he's connected...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:39:44 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Nonesy.  Winkies to you.  :wink:  :wink:  :wink:


winkies to my lala's  :wink:  :wink: (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/heartshape2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:40:25 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
BTW, Lala's.............I LUV the avatar! It's cute and cuddly!
Good thinking too! Check that list carefully before Santa checks it twice to find out who's naughty and nice!



Making a list...checking it twice...gonna find out which monkeys are nice...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:41:33 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Nonesy.  Winkies to you.  :wink:  :wink:  :wink:


winkies to my lala's  :wink:  :wink: (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/heartshape2.gif)



Let's see here...Nonesy on the "good" side of my list... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 12:42:07 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
BTW, Lala's.............I LUV the avatar! It's cute and cuddly!
Good thinking too! Check that list carefully before Santa checks it twice to find out who's naughty and nice!


Just send me the copy of who's naughty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 12:42:21 AM
I have no idea the background of this conversation, but Tacky's a Goomba. Doesn't he just look like he's only missing the big gold chains and blingy pinkie ring???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 12:44:24 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
BTW, Lala's.............I LUV the avatar! It's cute and cuddly!
Good thinking too! Check that list carefully before Santa checks it twice to find out who's naughty and nice!


Just send me the copy of who's naughty.


Sure thing, Carnut!

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/SEXY-WINK-BOOP.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:45:53 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I have no idea the background of this conversation, but Tacky's a Goomba. Doesn't he just look like he's only missing the big gold chains and blingy pinkie ring???


KING OF BLING another sign to make  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:46:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Nonesy.  Winkies to you.  :wink:  :wink:  :wink:


winkies to my lala's  :wink:  :wink: (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/heartshape2.gif)



Let's see here...Nonesy on the "good" side of my list... :wink:


(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/smiley.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 12:47:24 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I have no idea the background of this conversation, but Tacky's a Goomba. Doesn't he just look like he's only missing the big gold chains and blingy pinkie ring???


KING OF BLING another sign to make  :lol:


Yea can't wait for that....Joe T to start shootin' the signs....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:52:41 AM
(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/oilslick.gif)

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/JTBigflush.gif)

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/joetkingbling.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 12:53:58 AM
Time for me to turn in for the night.  Hugs to Nemo and Spooky, get the lights when you leave.

Yep, making a list... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 12:54:03 AM
howdy all.. popping in to hug NEMO for Lalas so she dont fire me and Santa dont leave me extra lumps of coal..  :wink:
 Have a good night all. been lurking off and on..  sighhh


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 12:58:04 AM
Here Angie

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/nemo.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 12:59:45 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Here Angie

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/nemo.gif)


  ROFL sistah!!  :) :)  I gotta save that one!! ha ha
Got your email.. will repsond in the AM.. TY.. :wink:
 I love yah!!   BIG winks to you!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 29, 2006, 12:59:52 AM
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 01:00:58 AM
I have others too Angie  :wink:  :lol:

Off to bed with me too, very late here and we have a cookie photo shoot tomorrow  :P

Night all !

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/rocks.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 01:04:01 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I have others too Angie  :wink:  :lol:

Off to bed with me too, very late here and we have a cookie photo shoot tomorrow  :P

Night all !

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/rocks.gif)


  Awesome!!  Send me the photos!! Cant wait to see what you have done sweety!!  :)    Night everyone!!  :)  weet dreams and  Justice for Natalee!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 01:05:15 AM
OMG  SWEET dreams not wet ones..    (I know my face is red as a beet here at home)  oops


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 01:09:21 AM
Greta repeats on the case after commercial for anyone ( like me) who missed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 01:10:25 AM
2NJSons_Mom-

I can't address every statement made for honestly I didn't focus on that aspect, I regret if I offended you ever, I would never wish to.

I guess I have simply developed a thick skin after over a year of Aruban and RU insults regarding the south and we hillbillies. So I do hope you will overlook our faux pas and see it as the anger against a lawyer with no ethics only for his clients alone but moreso greed, regardless of his ethnicity or his nationality.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:11:10 AM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.
--------------------
Memphis - I couldn't agree more, Greta has always appeared obessessed with Taco.  She always let Joe Blow have the last word, even Jossy complained about that at one time. She's spineless is my opinion.



Greta and Joe in bed together! Now there is a mental image I didn't need tonight, Sir IndyDan. ( gag * wretch ) :)

LOL

I got two Bennies that says Joe likes it on top!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:11:20 AM
2nJMom, sorry.  I do not think any of that was directed at you, and I sure did not mean it if I neglected to defend you. I apologize.  I do not believe my insinuation that Posner, Greta and Taco might be all connected was an Italian thing, but a group of people who shares commonness, not ethnicity.  There is so much good in the worst of us and so much bad in the best of us, and sometimes we are bad, but I don't think being Dutch or Italian, Irish or French makes someone bad, just what is in their heart, or not in it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:13:33 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Anna - sorry to take so long.  I was researching something and just saw your message:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 01:14:45 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 01:15:35 AM
That's what Joran was wearing at the casino that night - white T-shirt.
Wouldn't someone notice that in the two pictures - Natalee is dressed the same but Joran changes clothes?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 01:16:19 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
2NJSons_Mom-

I can't address every statement made for honestly I didn't focus on that aspect, I regret if I offended you ever, I would never wish to.

I guess I have simply developed a thick skin after over a year of Aruban and RU insults regarding the south and we hillbillies. So I do hope you will overlook our faux pas and see it as the anger against a lawyer with no ethics only for his clients alone but moreso greed, regardless of his ethnicity or his nationality.


Uh-huh. What she said. I have a major problem with Tacky, but expanding that to Italians is a leap I don't understand. Honestly, until you pointed it out, I'd never even thought about him being Italian. I always thought of him as being from a Las Vegas Casino.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 01:18:15 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.

 

 Hey 2NJ. I missed somethig it seems.  :(  Been bouncing around reading. half brain dead as it is from work!
  You be my piezon sweety! San and others.. heck I think  REd even knows what that is!!  MRS? Did you ever make Red that recipe in the cookbook I posted.. The Italian pie??
  Sorry 2N if you felt offended by something. I dont know what it was.. and honestly too tired to go bak to look?  Love yah sweety.. keep your chin up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:19:50 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.

I didn't take it as a blanket statement against Italians, more a statement against mob characters like Posner.  I could be wrong. I'm very sorry you were offended. Please try not to take it to heart, I'm sure it wasn't meant to hurt you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:21:12 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
That's what Joran was wearing at the casino that night - white T-shirt.
Wouldn't someone notice that in the two pictures - Natalee is dressed the same but Joran changes clothes?


I still believe the male seated behind her in the picture is Tater Headed Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:21:40 AM
Memphis - this is for you if you are still around tonight  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Memphiscopy.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Memphiscopy.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 01:22:41 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Memphis - this is for you if you are still around tonight  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Memphiscopy.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Memphiscopy.gif


  ROFL  too cute Klaas!!  
 Ok. my arse gotta get ot bed now.. Night! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 01:24:00 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
That's what Joran was wearing at the casino that night - white T-shirt.
Wouldn't someone notice that in the two pictures - Natalee is dressed the same but Joran changes clothes?

I still believe the male seated behind her in the picture is Tater Headed Joran.

Yes.  Same tshirt bunched up around the neck and the body slouched forward.   Just sitting behind the girls, listening, trying to casually make contact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 01:25:11 AM
HOW CUTE!!!!! Memphis, Klaas has you all gussied up for Christmas! I think there's mistletoe in there and it makes me want to kiss that 'lil noggin!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 01:25:14 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.

I didn't take it as a blanket statement against Italians, more a statement against mob characters like Posner.  I could be wrong. I'm very sorry you were offended. Please try not to take it to heart, I'm sure it wasn't meant to hurt you.



And I seem to recall a few negative statements directed at the Dutch but unless they say they mean ME, ANNA, I just don't take it personally.  In fact there were a few today that were pretty vile.  But it is people just venting.

Sorry NJMom that you are offended.  We wouldn't dare mean all Italians.  San would shoot us!   :D Just kidding!!  But the Dutch take it on the chin just about every day.  OK by me as long as it is not directed at me or mine.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 01:27:05 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Anna - sorry to take so long.  I was researching something and just saw your message:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)



Well, this one to me is even more shocking!  He is touching her!  Why has this not been on the news all day, too?  Did Joran only order and plan to use the other one for whatever nefarious purposes he has??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:27:19 AM
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 01:28:46 AM
I scrolled past the post but caught the word goomba.  Is that the one?
So I looked it up to see exactly what it meant:
Goomba: Italian word for Godfather, Implying mafia connections.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 01:29:17 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.


2nJSons - Something offends me on a daily basis here, but I get up and walk away for awhile. That's why I didn't jump in; I was working on those 4,000 deep breaths I occasionally recommend.

Mantra: It's not about me. It's not supposed to be about prejudice and politics. It's supposed to be about Natalee Holloway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 01:31:06 AM
Everytime I see Natalee in that picture, it just strikes me that she does not look happy and bubbly as she does in most all of her other pictures. There's a reason he chose that pose to impose himself in.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:31:36 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Anna - sorry to take so long.  I was researching something and just saw your message:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)



Well, this one to me is even more shocking!  He is touching her!  Why has this not been on the news all day, too?  Did Joran only order and plan to use the other one for whatever nefarious purposes he has??



Anna,

I bet you this photo will be all of de Vries Holloway show number 2!

Ya think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 01:31:42 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.



You can always say

We may not be much
But we're better than the Dutch

as some have been known to say.  I have those half Hispanic children, too, but I don't think they care if I say that they are just like their daddy.  They just remind me I also told them they were special, etc. and laugh.

But I am an American first, last and always.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:32:36 AM
I meant to say ALL OVER not all of.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 01:32:37 AM
In the photoshop "friendly" picture, I do not see the earrings that were very noticable in the original.  They have been blended into Natalee's hair.  Maybe a Pychiatrist (sp) should analyse these two pictures.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 01:34:49 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
[Anna,

I bet you this photo will be all of de Vries Holloway show number 2!

Ya think?



I like that thought, Carpe!  No, had not thought of that but I hope you are right.  Or Episode 3 out of 5??

Thanks, bet you are right about that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 29, 2006, 01:34:56 AM
Guess it started with the post about names ending in 'O', and it escalated from there.  Can't help myself, cuz, I'm my Dad's 1st daughter and was raised very well.  Love him and know how blanket comments affected him when his mind was in full tilt.  Can't teach an old dog new tricks is another thing I learned along the way.  

Should say good night and hope tomorrow brings many good things for Natalee's family and for all who check in here.  

My maiden name ends with an 'A' by the way, and have relations with 'I', 'O', 'E' and probably 'U'.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:36:53 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Anna - sorry to take so long.  I was researching something and just saw your message:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)




Klaas,

ya ever notice it looks like he has gas in every picture?

he's always puffin up and got this big dumb ass BABY HUEY grin on his face.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 01:37:32 AM
Not that I know a thing about the law (here, much less Dutch) - but I think there are serious legal issues about that photo. I think this is the one "Daniel" is concerned about. It implies more than the other one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 01:37:38 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I scrolled past the post but caught the word goomba.  Is that the one?
So I looked it up to see exactly what it meant:
Goomba: Italian word for Godfather, Implying mafia connections.


Is that what it means??  :shock:

Well, I used the word, and if intent means anything, I had always thought the word was slang for a "Mafia wanna be". You know, kinda like the Barney Fife of the "little dab will do ya'" suavy crew that is always around to hit on you in Vegas.

I truly apologize if I caused anyone to take offense. Tacky just looks oily to me, and my intention was aimed at him and him alone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 29, 2006, 01:38:31 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.


2nJSons - Something offends me on a daily basis here, but I get up and walk away for awhile. That's why I didn't jump in; I was working on those 4,000 deep breaths I occasionally recommend.

Mantra: It's not about me. It's not supposed to be about prejudice and politics. It's supposed to be about Natalee Holloway.


You are absolutely right...I just let the teacher in me want to enlighten and it was not the venue.  You do more than I can imagine.  Thank you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 01:39:11 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Guess it started with the post about names ending in 'O', and it escalated from there.  Can't help myself, cuz, I'm my Dad's 1st daughter and was raised very well.  Love him and know how blanket comments affected him when his mind was in full tilt.  Can't teach an old dog new tricks is another thing I learned along the way.  

Should say good night and hope tomorrow brings many good things for Natalee's family and for all who check in here.  

My maiden name ends with an 'A' by the way, and have relations with 'I', 'O', 'E' and probably 'U'.... :wink:


I think for some people, the only acceptable vowel ending is "e".  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:39:44 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Guess it started with the post about names ending in 'O', and it escalated from there.  Can't help myself, cuz, I'm my Dad's 1st daughter and was raised very well.  Love him and know how blanket comments affected him when his mind was in full tilt.  Can't teach an old dog new tricks is another thing I learned along the way.  

Should say good night and hope tomorrow brings many good things for Natalee's family and for all who check in here.  

My maiden name ends with an 'A' by the way, and have relations with 'I', 'O', 'E' and probably 'U'.... :wink:


I hope you will be with us tomorrow and we love you, Italian Jersey Mom, and ask your forgiveness for unintended comments that we may have made or acknowledged, etc.  Tell your dad we all apologize.  He will hear you, I bet he will and he will know it is with love whatever it is.  They still understand "love."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 01:40:24 AM
2NJSons_Mom:  Sorry you were offended and I cannot speak for the poster but I think s/he was implying "mob" connections and wasn't making reference to all Italians.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 01:42:04 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
In the photoshop "friendly" picture, I do not see the earrings that were very noticable in the original.  They have been blended into Natalee's hair.  Maybe a Pychiatrist (sp) should analyse these two pictures.


I went to the Front Page and looked again.  You are correct that the earrings are definitely subdued in the faux photo.  In fact, Natalee looks sort of blurry and sepia toned almost and Joran is very bright white and shining.

But it is odd the earrings were made to blend.  I still see the bracelet is just fine.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:43:34 AM
Carpe - lol  :lol:

FYI - I was once married to an Italian, as a matter of fact, my son is 1/2 Italian and his last name does end with an "e".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:44:42 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Leslie"
In the photoshop "friendly" picture, I do not see the earrings that were very noticable in the original.  They have been blended into Natalee's hair.  Maybe a Pychiatrist (sp) should analyse these two pictures.


I went to the Front Page and looked again.  You are correct that the earrings are definitely subdued in the faux photo.  In fact, Natalee looks sort of blurry and sepia toned almost and Joran is very bright white and shining.

But it is odd the earrings were made to blend.  I still see the bracelet is just fine.

.

I think all of that is due to the fact we are taking poor screen shots off of a video.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 01:44:46 AM
I think the earrings are more visible in the video than in the screen shots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Hotshot on November 29, 2006, 01:45:12 AM
LOL, look at this
(http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q173/freechop/JJ.jpg)
its not mine....LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:46:51 AM
Here's another screen shot I took off the video:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PhotoshopPic2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 29, 2006, 01:47:22 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Anna - sorry to take so long.  I was researching something and just saw your message:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)



Well, this one to me is even more shocking!  He is touching her!  Why has this not been on the news all day, too?  Did Joran only order and plan to use the other one for whatever nefarious purposes he has??



Anna,

I bet you this photo will be all of de Vries Holloway show number 2!

Ya think?

If Joran paid for this 2nd picture he was ripped off.  It obviously an altered photo.

Hey Monkeys....just peeking in!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:47:49 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
LOL, look at this
(http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q173/freechop/JJ.jpg)
its not mine....LOL


Now that is a big woman, long in the teeth, too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:48:27 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Carpe - lol  :lol:

FYI - I was once married to an Italian, as a matter of fact, my son is 1/2 Italian and his last name does end with an "e".



 :wink:

 (http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 29, 2006, 01:48:51 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
2NJSons_Mom:  Sorry you were offended and I cannot speak for the poster but I think s/he was implying "mob" connections and wasn't making reference to all Italians.


Leslie, I know that, but the 'O' reference made me think of Dad...and that''s it in a nut shell.  Sometimes there's no turning back.  I see it, now, but an hour ago I was flaming.   When I was younger, Dad used to be offended by mob references to Italians, because he was a good, upstanding citizen.  My reflex was to defend his name.  If you look at it with different eyes, it can be taken different ways.  It's common for many, I am quite sure.  

Thank you for all you do, here.  

Thanks, to everyone else, as well....

See ya in the AM, some time...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 01:48:56 AM
Re: Joran friendly pic - doesn't Natalee's nose and mouth look different from the original picture?  Those earrings are VERY subdued. The length of the hair is lopsided.  Certainly not a KLAAS act.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 29, 2006, 01:49:11 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
LOL, look at this
(http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q173/freechop/JJ.jpg)
its not mine....LOL


Now that is a big woman, long in the teeth, too.



ROTF!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:49:18 AM
http://arubadirtypolice.blogspot.com/

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:49:33 AM
Natalee looks so small and so defenseless against that big boxhead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 01:52:35 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
2NJSons_Mom:  Sorry you were offended and I cannot speak for the poster but I think s/he was implying "mob" connections and wasn't making reference to all Italians.


You can speak for me anytime, because you are right! 2NJ, again, I apologize and can honestly plead for forgiveness and plead ignorance! "Italians" never entered my mind!
BTW, my last name ends in a vowel and I am from the South. I take the "barefoot and room temperature IQ" comments with laughter as long as I know the motive wasn't to defame. Trust me, my motives for using the term "Goomba" were aimed exclusively at JoeT.

I'm going to turn in, but hope that you will sleep knowing that, at least this poster, had no ill will toward any nationality tonight and if I mis-spoke and caused you any stress at all, I sincerely am sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:53:05 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Natalee looks so small and so defenseless against that big boxhead.


It was always my belief the shoe had Natalee's blood on it where he kicked her in the head.  In fact, my secret writer from Aruba had told me that back in June.  I wonder if he/she is still breathing, and never did find out who he was .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:54:20 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Re: Joran friendly pic - doesn't Natalee's nose and mouth look different from the original picture?  Those earrings are VERY subdued. The length of the hair is lopsided.  Certainly not a KLAAS act.


yes, leslie

I picked up on that! They definitely did something with the color
on Natalees face that does not look natural in that mock pic.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:54:44 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
That's what Joran was wearing at the casino that night - white T-shirt.
Wouldn't someone notice that in the two pictures - Natalee is dressed the same but Joran changes clothes?


Again, never underestimate the stupidity of those involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:55:17 AM
CBB, I don't think you ever would intentionally hurt anyone's feelings, especially another monkey.  We all say things in our wrath that has been escalated by those who support Joran of the Ditch.  There I said it, "Joran of the Ditch."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 29, 2006, 01:57:42 AM
Oh Well....I am going to hit the monkey bunkey.....see you tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:58:22 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Everytime I see Natalee in that picture, it just strikes me that she does not look happy and bubbly as she does in most all of her other pictures. There's a reason he chose that pose to impose himself in.


Heh, heh, actually I think the original pic of her in that pose is just adorable.

To each his own I guess.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 01:59:48 AM
If Dilbert paid 200 E for it, he got ripped off!


 I have a neighbor who has a 12 year old that does better work than that fake Natalee / Joran picture.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:00:00 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Guess it started with the post about names ending in 'O', and it escalated from there.  Can't help myself, cuz, I'm my Dad's 1st daughter and was raised very well.  Love him and know how blanket comments affected him when his mind was in full tilt.  Can't teach an old dog new tricks is another thing I learned along the way.  

Should say good night and hope tomorrow brings many good things for Natalee's family and for all who check in here.  

My maiden name ends with an 'A' by the way, and have relations with 'I', 'O', 'E' and probably 'U'.... :wink:



Well, 2NJ, I'm just an American, don't much care where any of my ancesters hail from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 02:00:33 AM
Please no more blanket attacks against nationalities.  Attack Joe T. or Joran or Julia Renfro for what they have done but not for their nationalities. I know nobody is meaning it as a "blanket attack" but that's how it's coming accross.  Please, try to take that into consideration before you post.

Heck, my son is 1/2 italian and my husbands family originally came from the Netherlands.  That must mean I love Italians and Dutch  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 02:01:02 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Everytime I see Natalee in that picture, it just strikes me that she does not look happy and bubbly as she does in most all of her other pictures. There's a reason he chose that pose to impose himself in.


Heh, heh, actually I think the original pic of her in that pose is just adorable.

To each his own I guess.


At some time Monday night during Greta's program (I think it was), there was a small picture of Natalee with her hair done up on her head, she was smiling and had on her little black dance costume with the gold sequins at the neck and she looked like a princess.  Just gorgeous and it made me feel like (whoever said it here last night), just going back and stopping things from happening, being able to turn back the clock and protect her.  It was such a realistic picture of a beautiful, bright and smiling princess.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:01:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Leslie"
In the photoshop "friendly" picture, I do not see the earrings that were very noticable in the original.  They have been blended into Natalee's hair.  Maybe a Pychiatrist (sp) should analyse these two pictures.


I went to the Front Page and looked again.  You are correct that the earrings are definitely subdued in the faux photo.  In fact, Natalee looks sort of blurry and sepia toned almost and Joran is very bright white and shining.

But it is odd the earrings were made to blend.  I still see the bracelet is just fine.

.


I really think it's an artifact of the process and not intentional.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 02:03:16 AM
The two faux pictures look like the evolution of Joran and Natalee's relationship thru Joran's eyes - the happy beginning and the unhappy ending.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:05:45 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The two faux pictures look like the evolution of Joran and Natalee's relationship thru Joran's eyes - the happy beginning and the unhappy ending.


I still think they were supposed to be a setup to saying that Nat was still around and celebrating with dear ole sporter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 02:07:32 AM
I wonder who used the "slave" word, Natalee or Joran.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Kees2.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 02:10:35 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:10:58 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I wonder who used the "slave" word, Natalee or Joran.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Kees2.jpg


Again ya just can't overestimate the stupidity of those creating JVDS alibis and statements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 02:14:34 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I wonder who used the "slave" word, Natalee or Joran.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Kees2.jpg


 :shock: Well, I never had any doubt but this is a bit much.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 02:15:56 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I wonder who used the "slave" word, Natalee or Joran.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Kees2.jpg


Again ya just can't overestimate the stupidity of those creating JVDS alibis and statements.


The photos are no more stupid than the Letter Paulus pretended to receive where Natalee is alive and well living with somebody named David, etc.

THey are both equally stupid, imo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:16:43 AM
I do wonder how Joe T. can say all the things he does about the case with a straight face, but I guess that's how he makes the big bucks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 02:16:48 AM
I think Joran was trying to make the Kalpoe brothers hate Natalee and knew that they were sensitive about their non-Dutch heritage, so he invented the entire "slave" conversation.  Notice that he cannot pinpoint when Natalee spoke those words while driving around in the car with the music LOUD.  There could not have been too much quiet conversation if Deepak had to turn his car radio down to "9" in front of the Holiday Inn.
That might have been a question Greta could have asked; When Natalee made the shocking "slave" remark, where were you?"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 02:18:58 AM
I know they didn't go to the Holiday Inn, but the part about the music being loud seems like the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 02:21:10 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GOODNIGHT ALL!


G'nite Klaas

----------

Tylergal...


most def. Joran! imho

1,000 percent

it is in his actions, it is in his words.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:22:48 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I know they didn't go to the Holiday Inn, but the part about the music being loud seems like the truth.


Yeah, but I suspicion that Nat wasn't even in a condition to be able to even make small talk once they stepped away from CnC's front steps.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 02:25:06 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/peeweeinderHOWZE.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on November 29, 2006, 02:25:08 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I wonder who used the "slave" word, Natalee or Joran.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/Kees2.jpg


Again ya just can't overestimate the stupidity of those creating JVDS alibis and statements.


The photos are no more stupid than the Letter Paulus pretended to receive where Natalee is alive and well living with somebody named David, etc.

THey are both equally stupid, imo.


Yep I saw that. Stupid racist idiots.
You know I stopped watching Greta a LONG time ago but glad to know she is still showing her true colors. Ratings whore doesn't even come close to what she is.
J2K you are going DOWN!!!!!!! This WILL be solved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 02:25:27 AM
I think the only thing on Joran's mind was sex, so I doubt there was any conversation after they got into the car.


Title: It is late but I feel like sharing.
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 02:34:35 AM
I also think that Joran took Natalee back to his apt. so that Paul could watch thru the window.   I think Paul and Joran had a bet whether Joran could bring home the blonde girl that Papa liked so much.  Watching porn is one thing but being a voyeur is much more fun.  Since we know that Joran - most likely - had no homework assignment that had to be finished for school on Monday, I wonder what the 15 minute delay at the VDS compound was all about.  
It is all about distancing Paul from Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:55:36 AM
I do hope someone can explain to DeVries that Nat didn't have the money with her to buy drugs or cocaine.

So the testimony of any such possession or use should be checked for it's veracity.

And yes I do hope the faux pics get alot of MSM play with the correct attributions as to their creation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 29, 2006, 07:05:12 AM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I hate to ask this, but how do you all do the quote thing. I'm sure it's simple but I just can't seem to figure it out.


Thanks gang - I knew when I asked the answer was going to be a simple one, so simple I feel sorta silly asking now.  Thanks again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: AnnieMW1 on November 29, 2006, 07:07:32 AM
Quote from: "Red"
OK, am I missing something?

We are supposed to believe that Carlo and Janssen did not say this happened because Tacopina says it didn't???

Its just that same hard investigative journalism Greta that has allowed you to solve the disappearance of Natalee.

What a joke ... Hey Greta ... Tacopina speaking for Carlo ...

WOULD NOT THAT BE HERESAY?

Hint ... thats a legal term :)


OR BECAUSE PAULUS AND JORAN DENIED IT????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 07:08:38 AM
:shock:

HERE'S YOUR SIGN. - Jeff Foxworthy

Dilbert was getting messages funneled through to him from PVDS,
by way of Antonio Carlo by way of Anita VDS.  (in KIA)

Discussing the case and investigation
was off limits...with prison visits...
but I bet you that is was done
anyway.

Long message short? Shut your effin cakewhole. So Popsie Wopsie could be out in as little as 2 days.

 -Read-

There we, the reporting officers, were informed by the watch-commander on duty of the KIA that the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT refused to go with us.

The suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT talked to us subsequently, and informed us that he did not want to go with us to the police station in Oranjestad to make a statement.

The suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT gave us as a reason:

- he would only go with us, the reporting officers if is father was released;

- that his mother and his lawyer had advised him on behalf of his father to not make any more statements and to invoke his right to not make statements;

- that he would receive a message from his father's lawyer when he should make statements;

- that according to his lawyer, if he would stop making statements, his father would be released in two days;

- that he listens to his families advise;

- that the lawyers "Antonio CARLO" and "OOMEN" are good friends of his father

- that these two lawyers out of friendship with is father would defend them

- that he know that if he would make a statement he could bring his father into trouble


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 07:10:38 AM
>> CAKEHOLE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 07:13:19 AM
im almost full blooded italian


makes no difference to me..... there are good ones and bad ones

just like everything else


i hate gangsters, crooks and liars


born italian, will die an american


simple as that  8)  8)  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 07:22:33 AM
Paulus and Anita and their longtime friends ( who are lawyers)

Had their own little communication network going?


CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? Pass it on to the 'Sporter'


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 07:28:05 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Paulus and Anita and their longtime friends ( who are lawyers)

Had their own little communication network going?


CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? Pass it on to the 'Sporter'

Exactly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 07:36:37 AM
FOX - GRETA ON THE RECORD
Thursday, June 23, 2005

http://tinyurl.com/czdyw
--------------

VAN SUSTEREN: So how do you get through the days? I mean, can you see your son?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: No. The first days, when he was at the police office, I could go in sometimes in the morning, see him for five or ten minutes, sometimes at night, and I could hold him. I couldn't talk about the case or anything, just about love from this and this person, friends from Holland called, people who wrote e-mails. So I spoke with him about these things and just told him to stay strong and to tell the truth.

--------

Ooooooh Anita, you little fibbing a$$ bucket. :(


Title: morning all
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 07:40:03 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 07:44:13 AM
Yeah right, Anita,

Couldn't say a word about the case ... except for
the brief time you told him to ZIP UP his mouth
and wait for Mr. Antonio Carlo to give J
the green light.

So that way J  doesn't say anything damaging to about P..

(save your dad's bacon?)

(and Joran's bacon, as well.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 29, 2006, 07:49:27 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
:shock:

HERE'S YOUR SIGN. - Jeff Foxworthy
Dilbert was getting messages funneled through to him from PVDS,
by way of Antonio Carlo by way of Anita VDS.  (in KIA)
Discussing the case and investigation
was off limits...with prison visits...
but I bet you that is was done
anyway.
Long message short? Shut your effin cakewhole. So Popsie Wopsie could be out in as little as 2 days.
 -Read-
There we, the reporting officers, were informed by the watch-commander on duty of the KIA that the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT refused to go with us.
The suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT talked to us subsequently, and informed us that he did not want to go with us to the police station in Oranjestad to make a statement.
The suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT gave us as a reason:
- he would only go with us, the reporting officers if is father was released;
- that his mother and his lawyer had advised him on behalf of his father to not make any more statements and to invoke his right to not make statements;
- that he would receive a message from his father's lawyer when he should make statements;
- that according to his lawyer, if he would stop making statements, his father would be released in two days;
- that he listens to his families advise;
- that the lawyers "Antonio CARLO" and "OOMEN" are good friends of his father
- that these two lawyers out of friendship with is father would defend them

- that he know that if he would make a statement he could bring his father into trouble


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 07:57:18 AM
That is JUST

N-U-T-Z.


Unbelievable!

 :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 07:59:28 AM
From Amigoe:

A permit is required for businesses that want <to> let off fireworks
on or along public roads.
 This permit must be requested at the mayor’s secretariat no later than December 1st.  
--
So, where in Aruba, does one display the permit for fireworks on public roads? The lamp-posts?  Isn't it common to have fireworks displays after the sun goes down?  Do they have a special street sign that says Caution Fireworks Ahead?.   It doesn't sound smart to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:10:29 AM
Jorannnnnn, that was your momma at the door....
she said she and daddy love you...
and don't forget to...

S.T.F.U.

Quick Links:

Joran ALE Statement 6/24/2005

http://tinyurl.com/czdyw



FOX - GRETA ON THE RECORD
Thursday, June 23, 2005

http://tinyurl.com/czdyw


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:14:29 AM
What a lying crab apple!

FOX - ANITA - GRETA 6/23/2005

cont'd

And yesterday, he got transported to the Kia, the correction institute, Kia — that's how we call the prison here — and I could visit him a little bit longer. My husband, Paul, gets no access to him at all, and they refuse his lawyer to get any access to him during interrogation. He could tell me a little bit about his interrogations that were really, really tough. A lot of pressure on him, extreme pressure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:18:21 AM
-more-

VAN SUSTEREN: When you meet with him, do you have a time limit?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: I have a time limit, yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: And who's present?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: With somebody, some of the officers is there, or the guards. And if I talk about the case, I can leave.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 08:19:03 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
The derogatory blanket statements against Italians is offensive to me, most obviously, but it seems it does not bother most.......and I noticed no one backed me.  That's fine.  I'm a big girl...

Good night.  I know there is a better world out there.


If you are feeling that any statement I may have made was targeting a particular ethnic group you are wrong. That was not my intent, I was writing about  the "tip of the iceberg" with regards to Taco Joe's choice of high profile
clients and his future client base. Don't see this as an issue to take sides on, I am sure you don't need "backing"?  Sorry if I offended you , 1/2 of my relatives are members of the ethnic community you are feeling I have singled out, so please be assured I was not commenting on Italians inparticular if that is what you feel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 08:22:20 AM
" that according to his lawyer, if he (Joran) would stop making statements, his father would be released in two days; "
" that he know that if he would make a statement he could bring his father into trouble"
--
Shut up and Papa goes free?  Talk and/or make statements and Papa gets into trouble?  It hurts my head to read such nonsense.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:23:25 AM
My bum link from above

for Joran's 6/24/2005 statement

sorry!

http://tinyurl.com/yd3jt7


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 08:26:23 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Guess it started with the post about names ending in 'O', and it escalated from there.  Can't help myself, cuz, I'm my Dad's 1st daughter and was raised very well.  Love him and know how blanket comments affected him when his mind was in full tilt.  Can't teach an old dog new tricks is another thing I learned along the way.  

Should say good night and hope tomorrow brings many good things for Natalee's family and for all who check in here.  

My maiden name ends with an 'A' by the way, and have relations with 'I', 'O', 'E' and probably 'U'.... :wink:


OK you win, I quit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 29, 2006, 08:27:09 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Yeah right, Anita,

Couldn't say a word about the case ... except for
the brief time you told him to ZIP UP his mouth
and wait for Mr. Antonio Carlo to give J
the green light.

So that way J  doesn't say anything damaging to about P..
(save your dad's bacon?)

(and Joran's bacon, as well.)


Doesn't this speak volumes?   OK - if they were so innocent, wrongly accused, what in the world could Joran say that would be damaging to Paulus?  Give me a break.  They all make me want to puke.  

And since when should a suspect be able to make conditions that would allow another suspect to go free?  Oh - I forgot, we don't know their system.

BTW - Good morning monkeys.... Working and lurking... and going back to catch up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:31:42 AM
He was so totally communicating with his mother, his father,
and the lawyers... that it's PATHETIC.

His mother is a liar too!

--------

more-

--------

6/24/2005 Joran ALE Statement

- that he would only answer new questions asked by investigators

- that his lawyer had advised him only to make statements in his presence

- that his lawyer had started a lawsuit so that he would only make a statement with the lawyer present

- that he wouldn't come with us today because his mother would be visiting him at 14.00 hours that day

- that if he gets a visit from his mother he would discuss making another statement with her

- that only if his father, by way of his lawyer would say he should make a statement he would do so

- that he was waiting for the statement of his father and after that make another statement.

Of this, we, the reporting officers, on our oath of office, have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 24th 2005.

The reporting officers,

S.A. TROMP M.A.G. RAS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 08:36:33 AM
Carpe ~ that should be pointed out to De Vries.

I hope we are not depending on him too much, but seems there are a shortage of good-guys in this tragedy.

Morning Kimmie.

Morning bleachedblack.


Title: Anita is a liar!
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 08:39:27 AM
Thursday, June 23, 2005- On the Record
ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: So I spoke with him (Joran) about these things and just told him to stay strong and to tell the truth.
--
On June 24th 2005, at approximately 10.00 hours,
There we, the reporting officers, were informed the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT refused to go with us...  that his mother and his lawyer had advised him on behalf of his father to not make any more statements and to invoke his right to not make statements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 08:40:23 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
That is JUST

N-U-T-Z.


Unbelievable!

 :?:


Hey! You got something against Nuts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:41:41 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Yeah right, Anita,

Couldn't say a word about the case ... except for
the brief time you told him to ZIP UP his mouth
and wait for Mr. Antonio Carlo to give J
the green light.

So that way J  doesn't say anything damaging to about P..
(save your dad's bacon?)

(and Joran's bacon, as well.)


Doesn't this speak volumes?   OK - if they were so innocent, wrongly accused, what in the world could Joran say that would be damaging to Paulus?  Give me a break.  They all make me want to puke.  

And since when should a suspect be able to make conditions that would allow another suspect to go free?  Oh - I forgot, we don't know their system.

BTW - Good morning monkeys.... Working and lurking... and going back to catch up.



YOU GOT THAT RIGHT, KIMMY!


It makes me want to upchuck too.

He Mr. De Vries, I hope you are checking this out!!! What
kind of a legal system lets a 17 SNOT NOSED piece
of buffalo stuff gets to DECIDE when and where
interrogations take place?

A.L.E. must be OUTTA their MINDS.

Justice 4 Natalee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 08:43:57 AM
From today's Amigoe:

ORANJESTAD – From documents that Amigoe has received it appears that Aruba has requested the Court of First Instance to attach the proceeds from sale of the buildings in which the Aruba Marriott Resort & Stellaris Casino is established.  This is an amount of 420 million florins.  

The buildings were sold for 237 million dollars last week to a Caribbean investor in real estate.  The petition is dated November 24th, but has been submitted before that date, because it mentions the urgent reason for the sale of the buildings.

In the petition is stated that there is a dispute between the Aruban and Dutch government about the division of the proceeds.  The shares of the owners of the Marriott hotel, Plant NV are in hands of the Dutch Participation company for the Neth.Antilles (NPMNA) that is being managed by the Dutch Investment Bank.  Aruba says that the NPMNA has only received the shares temporarily, as guaranty for a Dutch loan of 55 million dollars.  

At that time, the government was in urgent need of money due to unfinished hotel constructions and hotel guarantees that were concluded in the eighties and had asked the Netherlands for financial support in accordance with the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands.  The then minister for Aruban and Antillean Affairs Ernst Hirsch Ballin (CDA) loaned Aruba 55 million dollars via NPMNA under the condition that the shares are placed with NPMNA.    This is the reason for the dispute now.  

 <snip - more at http://www.amigoe.com/english/ >


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 08:44:43 AM
I'm signing off...

I'm tired, and my typing shows it!!!!  


Catch ya later, my fellow Monkeys.

  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 08:45:46 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"

YOU GOT THAT RIGHT, KIMMY!


It makes me want to upchuck too.

He Mr. De Vries, I hope you are checking this out!!! What
kind of a legal system lets a 17 SNOT NOSED piece
of buffalo stuff gets to DECIDE when and where
interrogations take place?

A.L.E. must be OUTTA their MINDS.

Justice 4 Natalee!


Ah, the ALE knows what side their bread is buttered on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 08:46:12 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Memphis - this is for you if you are still around tonight  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Memphiscopy.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Memphiscopy.gif


oooo Klaas!!!  I love, love love it!  :D  :D

You are so sweet.

I'm gonna go change into my new clothes now. BRB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 08:48:36 AM
Is it today or tomorrow that the Antillies Justice system will be having their regularly scheduled 'flat tire'?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 29, 2006, 08:51:58 AM
November 29, 2006 -- A Dutch reporter investigating the 2005 disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway in Aruba claims a lawyer representing the first suspect in the case once paid a visit to the lead prosecutor "to clear his conscience."

At the meeting, lawyer Antonio Carlo allegedly told prosecutor Karin Janssen that he knew Joran van der Sloot played a role in the teen's disappearance, but that it was up to the police to "get the full proof," Peter de Vries told Greta von Susteren Monday on Fox News' "On the Record."


When Janssen wrote to Carlo asking for more details, she got a letter back from the "scared" attorney saying "you misunderstood me," de Vries said.


Van der Sloot's current attorney, Joseph Tacopina, yesterday dismissed de Vries' report as "utter bull- - - -. He's trying to cash in on the tragedy to publicize a documentary he made in Holland."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 09:01:21 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Is it today or tomorrow that the Antillies Justice system will be having their regularly scheduled 'flat tire'?


I think it's the 30th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 09:03:02 AM
'morning everyone!

How do I look in my new outfit?  :D

Thank you Klaas!!  :wink:

I'll be back this evening - must make some money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 29, 2006, 09:14:58 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
'morning everyone!

How do I look in my new outfit?  :D

Thank you Klaas!!  :wink:

I'll be back this evening - must make some money.


U Look adorable...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 09:19:55 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
What a lying crab apple!

FOX - ANITA - GRETA 6/23/2005

cont'd

And yesterday, he got transported to the Kia, the correction institute, Kia — that's how we call the prison here — and I could visit him a little bit longer. My husband, Paul, gets no access to him at all, and they refuse his lawyer to get any access to him during interrogation. He could tell me a little bit about his interrogations that were really, really tough. A lot of pressure on him, extreme pressure.


This is the kind of pressure Joran experienced in jail:

Joran would you like butter or jelly with your toast. :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 29, 2006, 09:20:48 AM
How can the Kalpoe brothers be released as suspects when the Dutch
team hasn't finished their investigation?  I thought that suspects in criminal cases in Aruba, remained as such for two years after their arrest.
Under what special circumstances do the Kalpoe's expect they have a chance that the court will rule in their favour?  The only correct judgment is to deny the motion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 09:25:25 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
How can the Kalpoe brothers be released as suspects when the Dutch
team hasn't finished their investigation?  I thought that suspects in criminal cases in Aruba, remained as such for two years after their arrest.
Under what special circumstances do the Kalpoe's expect they have a chance that the court will rule in their favour?  The only correct judgment is to deny the motion.

I agree with you Leslie but have we seen anything that is normal in this case.  Aruba wants to close the case and they don't seem to care about the laws.  I think there are a lot of people on edge in Aruba and it all stems from the corruption and coverup in the case.  Whether it is two years or tomorrow the Kalpoes will be released no matter what.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 29, 2006, 09:38:12 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I can't believe I am spending my second Christmas with you guys.  I love you all, but I would be happier if Natalee was home with her family.


Me too, Lala's, me too.

It's been a year since the doctor told me I have ovarian cancer.  Time has zoomed by for me.  It breaks my heart to think of Natalee's family being without her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 29, 2006, 09:49:14 AM
HI Monkeys....

Haven't been in for a while, just reading back and checking out what's happening...


Red is 1/2 Italian - not that there's anything wrong with that... :lol:  :lol:

I do read when I can, but work right now is killing me...

and Lala's - Other than the fact that Natalee hasn't found justice, I am glad that we are all still here for anohter Christmas... as 3rd would say, nothing but love for all y'all... (well he doesn't say all y'all ) but you get the point...

I hope in the future that we help another family  - or do our best too... sometimes the most help is the support we can give to them and each other.....

Please use the Amazon button for your Christmas shopping and support SM... it does make a difference....

and even though I said I wasn't going to, I am going to ask everyone for their prayers for my dad who is very, very ill  - so when you don't see me, just know I do read, I just don't always feel like talking...


and one last thing...

KEEP THE FAITH...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 10:09:20 AM
Quote from: "Red"
So lets understand this.

Way back when Greta has a lovefest with Joe T when the civil case got thrown out. Greta makes the comment that they all should go down to Aruba and solve this case. Like either of these two would do anything for free.

Peter de Vries, a respected criminal reporter does go to Aruba and attempts to do the right thing. Like it or not hate sites, all stated prior to de vries doing this NH case, he was a well respected investigator.

So de vries does his job and those that don't like what he says call him names.

How lame and typical is this? If you can't attack the message ... attack the messenger.

So what's your deal Greta? Jealous? Can't atand that someone would actually try and help a family for free and solve this case that does not meet your agenda?

How very sad that you would as a journalist, try and slant a story to meet your agenda.

Do us all a favor and go back to CNN where you obviously belong.


Boy, that's the truth...she DOES belong at Clinton News Network; And Joey T.'s pretended empathy for Natalee's family is nauseating. Also, his arguments are never convincing. They both get failing grades.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 29, 2006, 10:11:42 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Carpe ~ that should be pointed out to De Vries.

I hope we are not depending on him too much, but seems there are a shortage of good-guys in this tragedy.

Morning Kimmie.

Morning bleachedblack.


Hiya memphis - love the festive "do"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 10:14:33 AM
mrs. red - I am so sorry to hear about your dad. Are you near him (geographically - that makes it a little easier) ? Remember to take care of yourself too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 10:15:23 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Joe T.

Other people have seen the material too ,,, BTW

What happened to the hotel video tape?
What happened to the hotel room key story?
Why did your client pay to fauxtoshop a picture with NH?
What did the original search warrant state?
Do you want to finally state for the record that the VDS premises was not searched?

Oh and by the way, come on Greta ... you got the info regarding pics and comments of JVDS last night and today. Why no questions?

Does it not fit your agenda?


Good questions, Red.  I am completely disgusted with Greta and the path she obviously has chosen to take. What a sell-out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 29, 2006, 10:16:22 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I have no idea the background of this conversation, but Tacky's a Goomba. Doesn't he just look like he's only missing the big gold chains and blingy pinkie ring???


It's the background music that bothers me....

"stayin' alive, stayin' alive"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 10:21:57 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Tacopina : Two-Faced Bullsh!t

*********************************

Red says: "Joe T.  Other people have seen the material too, BTW

What happened to the hotel video tape?
What happened to the hotel room key story?
Why did your client pay to fauxtoshop a picture with NH?
What did the original search warrant state?
Do you want to finally state for the record that the VDS premises was not searched?

Oh and by the way, come on Greta ... you got the info regarding pics and comments of JVDS last night and today. Why no questions?

Does it not fit your agenda?

************************************

Red, this is "Front Page" material.

And monkeys should send copies to Greta's producers and Bill O'Reilly.

It's obvious to me that Tacopina demanded "equal time" to refrain from defamation lawsuit VS the network for all of the previous favorable HT coverage.  The lawyers told Greta to even it out, right or wrong.

Put it on the FP and e-mail it to the producers (forget Greta) -- let's hear what these losers have to say.

.


DITTO!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 10:22:16 AM
From today's Gretawire:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,232357,00.html

As for the continuing story about Natalee Holloway, I wish the latest news about the Dutch TV show meant that we are closer to learning what happened to Natalee. I don't think it does, but this is one of those many times I would love to be wrong. I speak frequently to her mother and the pain is immeasurable. I often get e-mails from viewers critical of Beth and I don't understand. You can disagree with her, you can think she is on the wrong track, but would you do anything different? Would you not push as hard as you can to find out what happened to your child? I admire Beth and we have frank discussions about the investigation. As you might imagine, it is not easy for Beth when I might have a different view about the investigation. Of course we both — and likewise others — have the same goal: to get answers. She deserves answers. That is basic human decency. It is deplorable the way this investigation has been handled (bungled?) in Aruba. It is cruel that the authorities in Aruba don't talk to her and give her real information, whatever that may be. She can handle the truth... I don't buy the excuse that Dutch law does not permit them to talk to her. There are ways to talk to families without jeopardizing the investigation or violating the law. And yes, it is possible it will still get solved... all that is needed is loose lips.

I speak often to other parents with missing children and I wish our show could help them. I am not sure what we can do to help any of them. I do think some publicity for them is good — it puts pictures of the children out there in case someone has seen the child and, in some instances, helps encourage the police to put the matter on the front burner. Our police are overburdened in many communities and the 'squeaky wheel' has some effect... but, of course, that means at the expense of another investigation.

I get e-mails from viewers daily about stories we have covered and viewers want updates — so do we. We check daily on the stories hoping for updates and will bring them to you when we get them. If we don't talk about it on the show chances are there is nothing new in the investigation.

As for last night's show, we had a surprise: Carl Cameron was supposed to be in our last segment. At 10:48 (I looked up at the clock), my line producer in NYC said we did not have Carl. I asked during the break where he was and was told he was on an airplane on a runway. I think this is going to be Carl's life for the next two years. As for us, what did we do? We scrambled — FOX pays us to 11 p.m., not 10:48!

E-mail No. 3 — This next viewer forgot to put his/her name on the e-mail:

[As] usual you spineless gutless coward you put on Taco Joe. How stupid of a bimbo are you? I think you stupidity knows no bounds? If the Van der Sloots or Kalpoes want air time on American TV, let them call in. I'm sure the bozos you work for will pickup the charges. Otherwise they get no airtime


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 29, 2006, 10:23:39 AM
Sorry to hear about your dad, Mrs. Red.  I always include "online friends" in my prayers - generally and specifically.  I figure He knows who you are and what you all need.  But I'll put in a special one for your dad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 10:32:27 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Greta = Pussy Whipped

She has allowed the network's lawyers to direct her coverage of the NH case.

Tacopina was hired to defend the civil action AND to shut down the news reporting.  He did so by demanding "equal time" vs defamation suit threat for previous months of "favorable" HT Family coverage and sympathies.

That's what this is about --

Greta has no cajones (in more ways than one).  Both she and Fox have caved on this case because they are afraid of a lawsuit.

I say the Fox lawyers get paid to defend objective journalism.  Get off your lazy asses and do some lawyering -- and get the reporters in the field so they can INVESTIGATE cases.  Especially newsworthy cases like the abduction, rape and murder of an American teenaged girl in Aruba by Joran van der Sloot.

A crime that was covered up by Aruban authorities at the behest of joran's father, Paulus van der Sloot.

If you can't do your job, then step aside.

.


Excellent!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 10:37:25 AM
klaas - thanks for passing along the gretawire. Love that email #3!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 29, 2006, 10:38:28 AM
Re: The possibility, discussed on FOB, that the drug witness PV was from one of the MB kids statements given to ALE in January.  I've noticed something that makes this pretty unlikely:

The portion displayed on the program was written from the viewpoint of the witness ("Natalee asked me...").  I have checked with someone who was present during one of the January interviews, and the student being interviewed was not asked to sign any statement at the end, in fact no notes were taken duing the interview at all.  So unless it were an actual tscript, a PV made from such a statement and signed by the investigating officer, would probably have have been written from the investigator's viewpoint ("_____ stated that Natalee asked her...").


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 10:39:37 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
klaas - thanks for passing along the gretawire. Love that email #3!

There were only 3 emails and the first 2 had nothing to do with this case.  I was glad to see Greta defending Beth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 10:49:55 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


That one is far more vicious & libelous than the other "blue shirt" one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 10:59:17 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,
Did you see the second photo on this short film clip by deVries?  Can you capture it as well?  It is more "chummy" than the first one.  I didn't realize there were two of them.   :shock:

http://tinyurl.com/y2kvzx

I don't know how to capture a still from within a video.

.


Anna - sorry to take so long.  I was researching something and just saw your message:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)



Well, this one to me is even more shocking!  He is touching her!  Why has this not been on the news all day, too?  Did Joran only order and plan to use the other one for whatever nefarious purposes he has??


He has even changed out the left-hand background, as well. Unreal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 11:04:23 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


 :lol: I have quarter-Dutch children but stress their maternal Scottish & Brit genes.  :lol: Actally, "Tater-Head" aptly describes former mother-in-law. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 11:10:38 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Carpe - lol  :lol:

FYI - I was once married to an Italian, as a matter of fact, my son is 1/2 Italian and his last name does end with an "e".



 :wink:

 (http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 29, 2006, 11:23:30 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys....

Haven't been in for a while, just reading back and checking out what's happening...


Red is 1/2 Italian - not that there's anything wrong with that... :lol:  :lol:

I do read when I can, but work right now is killing me...

and Lala's - Other than the fact that Natalee hasn't found justice, I am glad that we are all still here for anohter Christmas... as 3rd would say, nothing but love for all y'all... (well he doesn't say all y'all ) but you get the point...

I hope in the future that we help another family  - or do our best too... sometimes the most help is the support we can give to them and each other.....

Please use the Amazon button for your Christmas shopping and support SM... it does make a difference....

and even though I said I wasn't going to, I am going to ask everyone for their prayers for my dad who is very, very ill  - so when you don't see me, just know I do read, I just don't always feel like talking...


and one last thing...

KEEP THE FAITH...


Mrs. Red I am so sorry to hear about your dad.  I will keep him and you and your family in my prayers.  Hang in there girl!  ((((hugs))))


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 11:28:24 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I'm signing off...

I'm tired, and my typing shows it!!!!  


Catch ya later, my fellow Monkeys.

  :oops:


Your work is excellent and when you summarize, the whole picture becomes crystal clear. The legal & ethical mal-practice which has gone on in this case is simply grotesque and the civilized world needs to know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 11:30:07 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Is it today or tomorrow that the Antillies Justice system will be having their regularly scheduled 'flat tire'?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 11:33:21 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys...
Just making a post & go ... Kinda

Still trying to get my mind straight for  civil participation...

I probably should not say this (SM mg mt. please feel  free to delete)
I recently managed to shock myself on the typical 12 volt ignition / spark plug system.. of my car (dumb I know)

But it also brought back  a memory of being shocked by a 24 volt aircraft ignition system.   The sock from the 24 volt system knocked me flat for several minutes the sensation was not a pleasant at all.

For those that  have never experienced being shocked by your automobiles  spark plug / coil wires... or even your lawn mower.. all I can say is  IT normally very short and NOT a nice feeling.

I do apologize for my rant .. and do NOT advocate shock treatment on  anyone for any reason...
BUT... sometimes my mind does not want to listen to my  heart or hearts

Sorry again for the rant

Keep the faith
SeeeeYaaaBYeeee
Oldf


hey oldfart, yes it does give you quite a jolt, been there several times.  But I would just like to point out that you were hit by around 80,000 volts.  The ignition coil boosts that 12 volts up to around 80,000 volts in the average car so that the spark can jump the gap at the spark plug.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 11:36:40 AM
Mrs. Red: Hoping your dad does alright ~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 11:54:32 AM
Mrs Red-

I'm so sorry to hear about your father, I will keep him in my prayers and sending virtual hugs for I understand how this can overwhelm you particularly with the addition of the holiday season.

Klaas-

I had just read Greta's blog too, it is good to see her back-pedal to say the 'right things', my concern is why did she not say the right things on the air? Why bother when her viewership is far greater 'on the air' than on that flip of a blog she runs?

It leaves me wondering if she didn't get a phone call from JKelly after last night, he strikes me as very unafraid of Greta and he's pushed back to her on air prior. I just think that sounded like an apology on the backside of acting like a total a$$.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 01:00:12 PM
hoping all the best for Mrs Red and her father and everyone else too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:07:10 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
:shock:

HERE'S YOUR SIGN. - Jeff Foxworthy

Dilbert was getting messages funneled through to him from PVDS,
by way of Antonio Carlo by way of Anita VDS.  (in KIA)

Discussing the case and investigation
was off limits...with prison visits...
but I bet you that is was done
anyway.

Long message short? Shut your effin cakewhole. So Popsie Wopsie could be out in as little as 2 days.

 -Read-

There we, the reporting officers, were informed by the watch-commander on duty of the KIA that the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT refused to go with us.

The suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT talked to us subsequently, and informed us that he did not want to go with us to the police station in Oranjestad to make a statement.

The suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT gave us as a reason:

- he would only go with us, the reporting officers if is father was released;

- that his mother and his lawyer had advised him on behalf of his father to not make any more statements and to invoke his right to not make statements;

- that he would receive a message from his father's lawyer when he should make statements;

- that according to his lawyer, if he would stop making statements, his father would be released in two days;

- that he listens to his families advise;

- that the lawyers "Antonio CARLO" and "OOMEN" are good friends of his father

- that these two lawyers out of friendship with is father would defend them

- that he know that if he would make a statement he could bring his father into trouble


The VDS family must be so proud of Joran.  He kept silent at the instruction of his family, just like he told Deepak, he always did what his family instructed him and everything was for his family, i.e., he kept quiet so that Anita would not have to be embarrassed about Paulus' playing around with wine, women and gambling while she was in the Netherlands.  They must be so proud that they have asked their son to lie, and they must be very proud that he followed their instruction which now makes him a full-fledged lying, murdering criminal like his father.  Just a chip off the old block, that Joran, lazy eye, lazy mind and murdering heart.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:09:43 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
FOX - GRETA ON THE RECORD
Thursday, June 23, 2005

http://tinyurl.com/czdyw
--------------

VAN SUSTEREN: So how do you get through the days? I mean, can you see your son?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: No. The first days, when he was at the police office, I could go in sometimes in the morning, see him for five or ten minutes, sometimes at night, and I could hold him. I couldn't talk about the case or anything, just about love from this and this person, friends from Holland called, people who wrote e-mails. So I spoke with him about these things and just told him to stay strong and to tell the truth.

--------

Ooooooh Anita, you little fibbing a$$ bucket. :(


Perhaps it was during that visit that Greta arranged for Taco to work with the Sloots.  (Can I say Taco, Klaas, or is that wrong?  Do not want to break the rules here).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:21:47 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Guess it started with the post about names ending in 'O', and it escalated from there.  Can't help myself, cuz, I'm my Dad's 1st daughter and was raised very well.  Love him and know how blanket comments affected him when his mind was in full tilt.  Can't teach an old dog new tricks is another thing I learned along the way.  

Should say good night and hope tomorrow brings many good things for Natalee's family and for all who check in here.  

My maiden name ends with an 'A' by the way, and have relations with 'I', 'O', 'E' and probably 'U'.... :wink:


OK you win, I quit.


Bleached, I so enjoy your being here.  I do not think you need to quit.  In fact, I love your being here.  I think 2nJ mom was feeling like many southerners feel when we open up the jokes about the rednecks and soutnerners not having bathrooms, not having teeth, and hear all the chatter about being ill- or non-educated hicks.  We have endured it for generation after generation we are the only region of the country which has tried to preserve our culture while integrating into others.  We southerners are from all walks of life, everywhere, just like other regions of the country, but we are still the only group which the mainstream media, talking heads, elitist ivy leaguers and pseudointellectuals feel it  "politically correct" to joke about and make snide remarks, in addition to lie about.   I have lived and traveled quite a few places and chose to live here as do many others in their retirement years.  

I urge you, CBB and 2nJmom to return because Natalee needs us all!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:29:31 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I can't believe I am spending my second Christmas with you guys.  I love you all, but I would be happier if Natalee was home with her family.


Me too, Lala's, me too.

It's been a year since the doctor told me I have ovarian cancer.  Time has zoomed by for me.  It breaks my heart to think of Natalee's family being without her.


It seems such a short while ago and yet I know each day early on and even now you have a hurdle and you are my heroine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:31:11 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
HI Monkeys....

Haven't been in for a while, just reading back and checking out what's happening...


Red is 1/2 Italian - not that there's anything wrong with that... :lol:  :lol:

I do read when I can, but work right now is killing me...

and Lala's - Other than the fact that Natalee hasn't found justice, I am glad that we are all still here for anohter Christmas... as 3rd would say, nothing but love for all y'all... (well he doesn't say all y'all ) but you get the point...

I hope in the future that we help another family  - or do our best too... sometimes the most help is the support we can give to them and each other.....

Please use the Amazon button for your Christmas shopping and support SM... it does make a difference....

and even though I said I wasn't going to, I am going to ask everyone for their prayers for my dad who is very, very ill  - so when you don't see me, just know I do read, I just don't always feel like talking...


and one last thing...

KEEP THE FAITH...


Mrs. Red, I think about you daily and you and your family are in my prayers.  Special Lady, know that I think of you and wonder about you even though I might not say it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 01:32:53 PM
you can all call me anything you want to   8)

i just dont care

so fire away at me when youre in a bad mood  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



Ratings are what GRETA is After

MONEY doesnt talk...........IT SCREAMS


she is not worthy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:35:54 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I can't believe I am spending my second Christmas with you guys.  I love you all, but I would be happier if Natalee was home with her family.


Me too, Lala's, me too.

It's been a year since the doctor told me I have ovarian cancer.  Time has zoomed by for me.  It breaks my heart to think of Natalee's family being without her.


Sure do hope there's many more years for you to continue zooming by.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:39:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
klaas - thanks for passing along the gretawire. Love that email #3!

There were only 3 emails and the first 2 had nothing to do with this case.  I was glad to see Greta defending Beth.


Yeah, but at the same time Greta admitted she had a different point of view on the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 01:42:03 PM
More emails from Gretawire:

E-mail No. 33

Greta to suggest "Corruption" in the case of Natalee Halloway, is a gross understatement! It's the same old story the world over, if you are rich enough, have enough political clout/power or celebrity, you usually can get by with anything! This is really disgusting, to say the least! Don't you remember way back when that team from Texas who was there to dig for evidence, starting to dig around the the grounds where Joran lives, and Joran's dad came out and went ballistic, who demanded that they stop digging around their house or grounds? I think he was panicked that they might find some viable evidence, so he just went nuts and ordered the men away from his property. I will always believe that Joran is very much responsible for whatever happened to Natalee. If one was to dig around the grounds of Joran s family's house, they would find the evidence they need. I think something happened to Natalee while she was in Joran's little bungalow, and she was buried somewhere on their property. It is so frustrating to feel so helpless as to getting information, but at least the finger is pointing again where it belongs, back at Joran VanderSloot! It is terribly cruel that Karin couldn't have had the warmth, sympathy and class to keep Natalee's family informed on everything, but it's been a long, cruel, frustrating journey from the start!
Sincerely,
Loretta Young

E-mail No. 35

Hello Greta;
I am so mad about the Natalie Holloway case that I can't stand it. Followed it from day one. Why can't the CIA or some other group investicate this case, especially, if there was some kinea calusion of the Arubian autorities. Because then it matters to all future visitors for any country to Aruba, and can happen again, as these peeps just don't care about the Law.
Greg Farr
Portland, OR


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:42:33 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


 :lol: I have quarter-Dutch children but stress their maternal Scottish & Brit genes.  :lol: Actally, "Tater-Head" aptly describes former mother-in-law. :lol:


I think one of the biggest problems facing this country now and even more in the future is all the people who are born and raised here but still think of themselves as being from another country.

Irag and several countries around the world are fighting and dividing over 'sectarian/ethinic' lines.

I can see the same occuring here and causing much pain and division.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 01:45:10 PM
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 01:46:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
klaas - thanks for passing along the gretawire. Love that email #3!

There were only 3 emails and the first 2 had nothing to do with this case.  I was glad to see Greta defending Beth.


You know I hear politicians say they support each other all the time, but what is significant is how they vote in the Congress.  Those words coming from Greta as supporting Beth are hollow.  Actions speak louder than words.  Greta's actions are quite the opposite from what she says.  She is an empty suit, IMHO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:47:58 PM
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 01:50:47 PM
Heh, heh, all my north facing doors are iced shut.

Trees are looking kinda cool with the ice coating.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 02:02:07 PM
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 29, 2006, 02:02:20 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.


My theory is that some people like to have something to be against. If space aliens invaded us tomorrow, I bet all the earthlings would join together as one people and be against the space aliens instead of each other.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 29, 2006, 02:02:28 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:04:39 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


Kinda looks like some hanky panky was going on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 02:11:18 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


I agree with you Bleached he was removed from the case for the reasons we just found out.  Aruba was covering up the real reason.  The date of the article is June 17th which is exactly the time Carlo had the meeting.  Karin Janssen probably ran to Paulus with this information she is the only one who could have told what took place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 29, 2006, 02:12:25 PM
All of these Doctored pictures of Joran and Natalee remind me
of Robert Chambers....

Remember when he made that home movie twisting the head of a doll around saying my name is jennifer levin , then oops I think i killed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 02:16:07 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
All of these Doctored pictures of Joran and Natalee remind me
of Robert Chambers....

Remember when he made that home movie twisting the head of a doll around saying my name is jennifer levin , then oops I think i killed it.


A glimps of the evil which lies within......(is that a movie title?    :roll: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 02:18:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


I agree with you Bleached he was removed from the case for the reasons we just found out.  Aruba was covering up the real reason.  The date of the article is June 17th which is exactly the time Carlo had the meeting.  Karin Janssen probably ran to Paulus with this information she is the only one who could have told what took place.


Yup, at the time it didn't make sense, but there was always so much BS slinging that that  it probably didn't register, but now......months later it does make perfect sense that he was removed for reasons that are now clear.......have to respect the man for that.


Title: Money for the Blind
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:20:04 PM
Hey Tyler,

I just emailed the following to fox news as a suggested way to bring the U.S. currency into accord in a simple and inexpensive manner.

For $1 bill no change.

For $5 bill cut across each corner of the bill like this \

For $10 bill cut a concave notch at each corner.

For $20 bill cut each corner rounded off.

For $50 bill cut a notch in each corner.

For $100 bill cut concave notches in the center of each side of the bill.

No money machines would have to be changed no changes needed of any kind in the real world.

Just the Mint to incorporate the cutting dies into the printing process
as available.


Title: Re: Money for the Blind
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 02:34:19 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Hey Tyler,

I just emailed the following to fox news as a suggested way to bring the U.S. currency into accord in a simple and inexpensive manner.

For $1 bill no change.

For $5 bill cut across each corner of the bill like this \

For $10 bill cut a concave notch at each corner.

For $20 bill cut each corner rounded off.

For $50 bill cut a notch in each corner.

For $100 bill cut concave notches in the center of each side of the bill.

No money machines would have to be changed no changes needed of any kind in the real world.

Just the Mint to incorporate the cutting dies into the printing process
as available.

Would make them harder to counterfeit as well, IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 02:38:47 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


Then I guess I have no native country since I am not Indian.  I guess I am just a native hatch from the sky.  

I guess I can just leave it to all the Native Americans to pay the taxes.  Exempt, I say, exempt.


Title: Re: Money for the Blind
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 02:39:56 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Hey Tyler,

I just emailed the following to fox news as a suggested way to bring the U.S. currency into accord in a simple and inexpensive manner.

For $1 bill no change.

For $5 bill cut across each corner of the bill like this \

For $10 bill cut a concave notch at each corner.

For $20 bill cut each corner rounded off.

For $50 bill cut a notch in each corner.

For $100 bill cut concave notches in the center of each side of the bill.

No money machines would have to be changed no changes needed of any kind in the real world.

Just the Mint to incorporate the cutting dies into the printing process
as available.


Now that is interesting and well thought out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 02:41:11 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


we are neighbors  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 02:44:11 PM
i will get us back on TOPIC


i hate all of them

that are involved in the MURDER of Natalee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 02:46:31 PM
i said

i hate them all


Title: Re: Money for the Blind
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 02:48:57 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Hey Tyler,

I just emailed the following to fox news as a suggested way to bring the U.S. currency into accord in a simple and inexpensive manner.

For $1 bill no change.

For $5 bill cut across each corner of the bill like this \

For $10 bill cut a concave notch at each corner.

For $20 bill cut each corner rounded off.

For $50 bill cut a notch in each corner.

For $100 bill cut concave notches in the center of each side of the bill.

No money machines would have to be changed no changes needed of any kind in the real world.

Just the Mint to incorporate the cutting dies into the printing process
as available.


Now that is interesting and well thought out.


What else would you expect from moi?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 02:52:38 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i said

i hate them all


Me Too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 29, 2006, 02:56:16 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
i said

i hate them all


Me Too.


ME THREE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 29, 2006, 02:58:44 PM
Just doing a quick drive by.. can't get motivated at work today... :twisted:

thanks for all the prayers and well wishes! I do appreciate it...


I can't understand how any lawyer on TV let's Tacky Joe get away with it when he claims that the NY case was thrown out on merit, from what I understood that wasn't it.... It was thrown out on venue, totally different issues...says completely different things!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 29, 2006, 03:06:35 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


I agree with you Bleached he was removed from the case for the reasons we just found out.  Aruba was covering up the real reason.  The date of the article is June 17th which is exactly the time Carlo had the meeting.  Karin Janssen probably ran to Paulus with this information she is the only one who could have told what took place.


Yup, at the time it didn't make sense, but there was always so much BS slinging that that  it probably didn't register, but now......months later it does make perfect sense that he was removed for reasons that are now clear.......have to respect the man for that.


Hind sight is 20/20.  Okay - who would have hired Paulus to the law firm in which Carlo works?  Doesn't he work in the same?  And if so, why?  to keep an eye on Carlo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 03:08:07 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Just doing a quick drive by.. can't get motivated at work today... :twisted:

thanks for all the prayers and well wishes! I do appreciate it...


I can't understand how any lawyer on TV let's Tacky Joe get away with it when he claims that the NY case was thrown out on merit, from what I understood that wasn't it.... It was thrown out on venue, totally different issues...says completely different things!!

What I don't get is that none of these lawyers challenge him.  The only one that I've seen challenge him is Kimberly Guilfoyle.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 03:13:10 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


I agree with you Bleached he was removed from the case for the reasons we just found out.  Aruba was covering up the real reason.  The date of the article is June 17th which is exactly the time Carlo had the meeting.  Karin Janssen probably ran to Paulus with this information she is the only one who could have told what took place.


Yup, at the time it didn't make sense, but there was always so much BS slinging that that  it probably didn't register, but now......months later it does make perfect sense that he was removed for reasons that are now clear.......have to respect the man for that.


Hind sight is 20/20.  Okay - who would have hired Paulus to the law firm in which Carlo works?  Doesn't he work in the same?  And if so, why?  to keep an eye on Carlo?

BINGO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 29, 2006, 03:14:54 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
All of these Doctored pictures of Joran and Natalee remind me
of Robert Chambers....

Remember when he made that home movie twisting the head of a doll around saying my name is jennifer levin , then oops I think i killed it.




I remember Jacq, and my sister and I were talking about the same thing.....sick,sick,sick, sick!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 03:21:24 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
i said

i hate them all


Me Too.


ME THREE



me 43

 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 03:24:55 PM
Joran obviously tried to throw the scent in the direction that
included the K2 brothers being the last one to be with natalee
thats why he had so many differnet stories about how he got home


joran was dropped off at home by K2 brothers with Natalee and then later took Natalee in the VANDER SCUM car....

hmmmmmmmmmmmm..........

 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: KackyLacky on November 29, 2006, 03:25:49 PM
Hi ya'll!

I have been reading and keeping up. I was so proud the other night when Beth basically complimented the work done by you guys in gathering and publishing information about Natalee.

mrd red-----------my prayers are so with you and your Dad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 03:30:58 PM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Hi ya'll!

I have been reading and keeping up. I was so proud the other night when Beth basically complimented the work done by you guys in gathering and publishing information about Natalee.

mrd red-----------my prayers are so with you and your Dad.

Hi Kacky nice to see you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 29, 2006, 03:34:45 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Just doing a quick drive by.. can't get motivated at work today... :twisted:

thanks for all the prayers and well wishes! I do appreciate it...


I can't understand how any lawyer on TV let's Tacky Joe get away with it when he claims that the NY case was thrown out on merit, from what I understood that wasn't it.... It was thrown out on venue, totally different issues...says completely different things!!

What I don't get is that none of these lawyers challenge him.  The only one that I've seen challenge him is Kimberly Guilfoyle.


IMO, he won't come on their show if challenged.... notice how he fills in from time to time on CourtTV... and what about the conflict of interest?  He gave Beth advice one time on Rita's show... y'all don't think they talked in the "green room"?  It's just wrong on so many levels....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mrs. red on November 29, 2006, 03:36:24 PM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Hi ya'll!

I have been reading and keeping up. I was so proud the other night when Beth basically complimented the work done by you guys in gathering and publishing information about Natalee.

mrd red-----------my prayers are so with you and your Dad.


Thanks Kacky...

it's good to see you... but i miss that red dress!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 03:40:36 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Joran obviously tried to throw the scent in the direction that
included the K2 brothers being the last one to be with natalee
thats why he had so many differnet stories about how he got home


joran was dropped off at home by K2 brothers with Natalee and then later took Natalee in the VANDER SCUM car....

hmmmmmmmmmmmm..........

 :shock:


Hindsight is 20/20.....bet you are right Mr. Robots , makes sense why they confiscated the Sloots vehicles....but I can't believe that nothing was found. Even at this late date..... FBI/ALE  need to obtain a warrant and get back there and do a forensic search of Montanya 19 in it's entirity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: KackyLacky on November 29, 2006, 04:11:48 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"

Thanks Kacky...

it's good to see you... but i miss that red dress!


LOL......
I will re-upload my avatar in a little while. The last time I was here, that feature wasn't working.
But your "little red dress" is way more slammin' than mine! LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 29, 2006, 04:21:15 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


Then I guess I have no native country since I am not Indian.  I guess I am just a native hatch from the sky.  

I guess I can just leave it to all the Native Americans to pay the taxes.  Exempt, I say, exempt.



I pay taxes just like everyone else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 04:23:09 PM
Someone help me out with this - For Natalee's yearbook, to accompany her class picture, she chose some lines from "Freebird". I *think* these are the lines - did she use all 4 of these? Anybody know FOR SURE?

Quote
If I leave here tomorrow
Would you still remember me?
For I must be travelling on, now,
'Cause there's too many places I've got to see.


Thanks. (Another project I'm working on ... )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 04:25:47 PM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Quote from: "mrs. red"

Thanks Kacky...

it's good to see you... but i miss that red dress!


LOL......
I will re-upload my avatar in a little while. The last time I was here, that feature wasn't working.
But your "little red dress" is way more slammin' than mine! LOL

Hi Kacky - great to see you!

The avatar thing still isn't working normally but we found a way to make it work.  You have to have your avatar in photobucket though.

Here is your avatar.  Copy the link below and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.  That's the only way it works right now.  :wink:

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/kacky.gif

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/kacky.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 04:26:08 PM
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 04:30:05 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


1.  The judge will oversleep and miss the plane
2.  The plane will have a flat tire
3.  The judge is flying standby and will get "bumped"
4.  Other more important matters will delay the hearing date again
5.  K2 will be released as suspects but NOT Joran


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 04:44:02 PM
I am afraid I have a bad premonition about the court case tomorrow, hope I am wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 04:45:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


1.  The judge will oversleep and miss the plane
2.  The plane will have a flat tire
3.  The judge is flying standby and will get "bumped"
4.  Other more important matters will delay the hearing date again
5.  K2 will be released as suspects but NOT Joran


That about covers it Klaas. I would say 1-4 is about a 80% chance with 5 being 20%.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 04:46:16 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


1.  The judge will oversleep and miss the plane
2.  The plane will have a flat tire
3.  The judge is flying standby and will get "bumped"
4.  Other more important matters will delay the hearing date again
5.  K2 will be released as suspects but NOT Joran


That about covers it Klaas. I would say 1-4 is about a 80% chance with 5 being 20%.


I'm actually leaning towards #4


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 04:48:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


1.  The judge will oversleep and miss the plane
2.  The plane will have a flat tire
3.  The judge is flying standby and will get "bumped"
4.  Other more important matters will delay the hearing date again
5.  K2 will be released as suspects but NOT Joran


I will say they will release all of them.  They won't release one without the other.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: NM on November 29, 2006, 04:50:54 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/peeweeinderHOWZE.png)


Hi Carpe great to see you on the inside!!

Interesting, that in the above double pix, only PeeWee is riding a boy's bike.

Hi Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 04:51:18 PM
do we have a link to the whole unedited version of the Skeeters tape?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 04:53:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'm actually leaning towards #4

They could use the *file is in Holland* excuse again.

Or they could just release all 3 and call it strategic...for old-times sake.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 04:55:55 PM
Just posted by AB on the front page of SM:

I’m from the Netherlands. First I saw the show of Peter R. de Vries, see #27.
Now Peter R. de Vries was interviewed on TV by Robert Jensen, he is the ‘Dutch David Letterman’ with a a lot of Dutch viewers. Jensen also had Beth Twitty live on the phone.

Jensen asked Peter R. de Vries: “What do you think happend?”
And de Vries had this very good anwear. He said: “I just have a very long list of facts and the facts speak for themselves”. I think this kind of media attention in The Netherlands is very good for this case.
He also said: “I was only on Aruba for a few days with one other person and I have all this information, I wonder what happens if The Netherlands are sending a whole team for a few weeks…”

A friend of mine is living in Arnhem near Zevenaar, the place where Joran is living, and she said to me that it’s the talk of the day over there.

Just want to share…
ab


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 04:57:05 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "robots"
Joran obviously tried to throw the scent in the direction that
included the K2 brothers being the last one to be with natalee
thats why he had so many differnet stories about how he got home


joran was dropped off at home by K2 brothers with Natalee and then later took Natalee in the VANDER SCUM car....

hmmmmmmmmmmmm..........

 :shock:


Hindsight is 20/20.....bet you are right Mr. Robots , makes sense why they confiscated the Sloots vehicles....but I can't believe that nothing was found. Even at this late date..... FBI/ALE  need to obtain a warrant and get back there and do a forensic search of Montanya 19 in it's entirity.


 8) yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 29, 2006, 05:06:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by AB on the front page of SM:

I’m from the Netherlands. First I saw the show of Peter R. de Vries, see #27.
Now Peter R. de Vries was interviewed on TV by Robert Jensen, he is the ‘Dutch David Letterman’ with a a lot of Dutch viewers. Jensen also had Beth Twitty live on the phone.

Jensen asked Peter R. de Vries: “What do you think happend?”
And de Vries had this very good anwear. He said: “I just have a very long list of facts and the facts speak for themselves”. I think this kind of media attention in The Netherlands is very good for this case.
He also said: “I was only on Aruba for a few days with one other person and I have all this information, I wonder what happens if The Netherlands are sending a whole team for a few weeks…”

A friend of mine is living in Arnhem near Zevenaar, the place where Joran is living, and she said to me that it’s the talk of the day over there.

Just want to share…
ab


Good maybe everyone there will realise there living with and around a murderer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 05:09:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
A friend of mine is living in Arnhem near Zevenaar, the place where Joran is living, and she said to me that it’s the talk of the day over there.

Thinking from the Slootie perspective, Joran should have stayed in Aruba until the story cooled down. On the whole i do not think the Dutch populace is going to buy his crap. As well they shouldn't.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 05:14:14 PM
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: AnnieMW1 on November 29, 2006, 05:14:54 PM
I wonder whether this is "Breaking News" in the Netherlands and how much coverage this case received in June of 05 over there.  

We assume everybody was glued to Fox like we were...but perhaps the case will get a 2nd life over there now.  

The question is - Will any powers that be do anything about it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:16:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by AB on the front page of SM:

I’m from the Netherlands. First I saw the show of Peter R. de Vries, see #27.
Now Peter R. de Vries was interviewed on TV by Robert Jensen, he is the ‘Dutch David Letterman’ with a a lot of Dutch viewers. Jensen also had Beth Twitty live on the phone.

Jensen asked Peter R. de Vries: “What do you think happend?”
And de Vries had this very good anwear. He said: “I just have a very long list of facts and the facts speak for themselves”. I think this kind of media attention in The Netherlands is very good for this case.
He also said: “I was only on Aruba for a few days with one other person and I have all this information, I wonder what happens if The Netherlands are sending a whole team for a few weeks…”

A friend of mine is living in Arnhem near Zevenaar, the place where Joran is living, and she said to me that it’s the talk of the day over there.

Just want to share…
ab


this is wonderful news.  Hopefully Jorans hiding place isnt so comfortable anymore.  I do not think the Dutch folks want a POS like Joran to give the Dutch a bad name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 05:17:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Does anyone else besides me think this is a lame excuse for KJ to remove Carlo as Joran's attorney?

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 05:18:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


I posted almost the exact same thing earlier on page 22? Hummmm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 05:19:25 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
I wonder whether this is "Breaking News" in the Netherlands and how much coverage this case received in June of 05 over there.  

We assume everybody was glued to Fox like we were...but perhaps the case will get a 2nd life over there now.  

The question is - Will any powers that be do anything about it?

Judging by the front page posts from people in the Netherlands, most of them did know that much about the case.  Most thought Joran was innocent until they saw the De Vries show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 05:20:31 PM
Bleachedblack - they probably copied it from here.  Sorry, I missed your post on page 22  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:24:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Does anyone else besides me think this is a lame excuse for KJ to remove Carlo as Joran's attorney?

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.


My thoughts are that John Carlo may have been onto the fact that they were framing the security guards for the disappearance so he went to give them some legal advice or possibly attempt to represent them.  So the PROSECUTROR'S needed to get him put somewhere that he couldnt interfere with their little scam.  Then Paulus was put in place to make sure he kept quiet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 29, 2006, 05:24:41 PM
I dont know if someone posted this but,

E-mail No. 3 - This next viewer forgot to put his/her name on the e-mail:

[As] usual you spineless gutless coward you put on Taco Joe. How stupid of a bimbo are you? I think you stupidity knows no bounds? If the Van der Sloots or Kalpoes want air time on American TV, let them call in. I'm sure the bozos you work for will pickup the charges. Otherwise they get no airtime


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,232357,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:27:20 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Does anyone else besides me think this is a lame excuse for KJ to remove Carlo as Joran's attorney?

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.


My thoughts are that John Carlo may have been onto the fact that they were framing the security guards for the disappearance so he went to give them some legal advice or possibly attempt to represent them.  So the PROSECUTROR'S needed to get him put somewhere that he couldnt interfere with their little scam.  Then Paulus was put in place to make sure he kept quiet.


I keep calling him John Carlo because I know a John Carlo.  I mean ANTONIO Carlo

GRRRRR!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 05:29:29 PM
At the time, Janssen said that Carlo interviewing the security guard was very detrimental to the case. It gave Joran insight into what the new K2 story was.

Bottom Line - Antonio Carlo was willing to break the law and put his career in jeopordy to assist Joran. I suspect the list of people who did the same is extensive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 05:32:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Bleachedblack - they probably copied it from here.  Sorry, I missed your post on page 22  :wink:


No problem, i just didn't know if you saw it. I too feel it was not only a poor excuse for removing Carlo from the case but  likely just a coverup. How else would it be explained that he was being removed without the truth of what transpired. It does appear though that he back on the case in August 2005 because I have foulnd several news release quotes made by A Carlo regarding the case/Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 05:36:58 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
At the time, Janssen said that Carlo interviewing the security guard was very detrimental to the case. It gave Joran insight into what the new K2 story was.

Bottom Line - Antonio Carlo was willing to break the law and put his career in jeopordy to assist Joran. I suspect the list of people who did the same is extensive.


VERY true igsigs....and some of De Vries statements can now be utilized as leverage for documentation from as early as June 2005, to nail them to the wall. If only De Vries uses Aruba's own published statements he likely can build a tower of guilt to cage them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:39:20 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
At the time, Janssen said that Carlo interviewing the security guard was very detrimental to the case. It gave Joran insight into what the new K2 story was.

Bottom Line - Antonio Carlo was willing to break the law and put his career in jeopordy to assist Joran. I suspect the list of people who did the same is extensive.


the security guards were released on the 13th.  Did Carlo talk to them after they were released?  If so, how was talking to the, breaking the law?

It seems to me if he did break the law it was to rat Joran out by telling Jansen he was involved in the disappearance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 05:43:52 PM
A friend of mine is living in Arnhem near Zevenaar, the place where Joran is living, and she said to me that it’s the talk of the day over there.
.
Hope it lasts longer than a day.

I am so glad that the Dutch are paying attention. The American Media, Greta in particular, make me want to guess what ? GAG.
Why does she allow Joe Tacopina on her show to spout lies ?
Do you think that the photoshopped pix were Joran's " proof " that Natalee was alive ?
I did note that DeVries talked to the lady who was doing the book with Joran and he told her about this. Maybe it will screw that deal for him.
I also didn't get what Kees was talking about , when he gets the money ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 05:44:09 PM
Carlo interviewed the SG while he was in jail. He needed to know what new story the K's were telling ALE. IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 29, 2006, 05:52:13 PM
Dare I ask what's next?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 05:52:27 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Carlo interviewed the SG while he was in jail. He needed to know what new story the K's were telling ALE. IMO


which of the two played domino's with Deepak as well? I feel sure that made Carlo and Paulus sweat a few.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:52:32 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Carlo interviewed the SG while he was in jail. He needed to know what new story the K's were telling ALE. IMO


how do you know he interviewed them while in jail?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 05:54:34 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Dare I ask what's next?


Hi Peaches, how are you feeling?

I hope a good ole expose and spanish inquisition, maybe if I'm real good Santa will bring me that ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 05:54:57 PM
Maybe it was Freddy who told Carlo what really happened? Carlo was at Sloot Central when Freddy spilled the beans. You know, the meeting Paulus can't recall because he was *in the kitchen*. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 05:56:49 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Carlo interviewed the SG while he was in jail. He needed to know what new story the K's were telling ALE. IMO


how do you know he interviewed them while in jail?

That's what KJ said. And that's why he was booted (temporarily) from the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 29, 2006, 05:58:05 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Dare I ask what's next?


Hi Peaches, how are you feeling?

I hope a good ole expose and spanish inquisition, maybe if I'm real good Santa will bring me that ?


Pretty good, thanks.

"No one ever expects the Spanish Inquisition"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:58:22 PM
this make it sound like Carlo talked to the security guards after they were already released:

"The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159862,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 05:59:55 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Maybe it was Freddy who told Carlo what really happened? Carlo was at Sloot Central when Freddy spilled the beans. You know, the meeting Paulus can't recall because he was *in the kitchen*. lol


this is a good possibility


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 06:01:21 PM
Quote from: "blah"
this make it sound like Carlo talked to the security guards after they were already released:

"The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159862,00.html

BLAH...you might be right. I have always assumed that the *in jail* part was why Carlo was sanctioned. But now...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 06:04:03 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "blah"
this make it sound like Carlo talked to the security guards after they were already released:

"The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159862,00.html

BLAH...you might be right. I have always assumed that the *in jail* part was why Carlo was sanctioned. But now...


see what I'm getting at?  If he interviewed them AFTER they were released, then whats the big deal?  I dont think he would have been breaking any laws at that point, why would they remove him from the case?  Maybe he really did have this talk with Janssen or maybe he they couldnt trust him to keep his mouth shut about the attemoted frame job.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 06:04:55 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Dare I ask what's next?


Hi Peaches, how are you feeling?

I hope a good ole expose and spanish inquisition, maybe if I'm real good Santa will bring me that ?


Pretty good, thanks.

"No one ever expects the Spanish Inquisition"


 :wink:  (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/word/spinquisition.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 06:06:09 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Carlo interviewed the SG while he was in jail. He needed to know what new story the K's were telling ALE. IMO


which of the two played domino's with Deepak as well? I feel sure that made Carlo and Paulus sweat a few.....

Wasn't that Jossy's brothers sisters cousins neighbors gardener? Or something like that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 06:13:15 PM
I am trying to undertand HOW the search warrant was limited to just Joran's lair. I do remember something on NG at the time, that the police were prepared to search the entire property, but then it was limited.
By whom ? Witt or Vocking ?  
I did understand the legal issue. It was the definiton of Joran's living quarters. And that it was considered a "separate " building.
But who made that decision ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 06:14:17 PM
Quote from: "blah"
see what I'm getting at?  If he interviewed them AFTER they were released, then whats the big deal?  I dont think he would have been breaking any laws at that point, why would they remove him from the case?  Maybe he really did have this talk with Janssen or maybe he they couldnt trust him to keep his mouth shut about the attemoted frame job.

A temporary slap-down? He did return to the case.

FWIW: Carlo is not a criminal lawyer. This was his 1st criminal case. I believe that this came out in the de Vries program.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 06:16:24 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

No Body, No Crime … May Work in Aruba, not in the US … Hans Reiser Pleads Not Guilty to Murder of Nina Reiser



http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/11/29/no-body-no-crime-may-work-in-aruba-not-in-the-us-hans-reiser-pleads-not-guilty-to-murder-of-nina-reiser/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 06:19:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
I wonder whether this is "Breaking News" in the Netherlands and how much coverage this case received in June of 05 over there.  

We assume everybody was glued to Fox like we were...but perhaps the case will get a 2nd life over there now.  

The question is - Will any powers that be do anything about it?

Judging by the front page posts from people in the Netherlands, most of them did know that much about the case.  Most thought Joran was innocent until they saw the De Vries show.


AND that is what Joran was hoping for....

that MOST people were not following the case and therefore the IDIOTIC
attempt at the PICTURE CHARADE

by Joran for a couple hundered smackers


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 06:20:34 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Does anyone else besides me think this is a lame excuse for KJ to remove Carlo as Joran's attorney?

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.


My thoughts are that John Carlo may have been onto the fact that they were framing the security guards for the disappearance so he went to give them some legal advice or possibly attempt to represent them.  So the PROSECUTROR'S needed to get him put somewhere that he couldnt interfere with their little scam.  Then Paulus was put in place to make sure he kept quiet.


I keep calling him John Carlo because I know a John Carlo.  I mean ANTONIO Carlo

GRRRRR!!!!!


I think Antonio Carlo went to see the security guards:  (1)  They were somewhere in the vicinity and he wanted to know what they knew.  (2)  They were arrested in order for Paulus and Antonio to be able to quetion them.  (3)  Karin Janssen figured out a way to get them behind bars so that they would not be out on the streets talking.  (4)  Whatever information they had was worth it to Paulus for him to pay Carlo to presents Johns & Jones, and use legal wrangling to keep them in jail for a while so they could get their stories straight before the Sporter and Paulus were incarcerated.  (5)  I think Paulus knows something on Johns & Jones, maybe nothing significant, but enough to keep them quiet, because both o them know Paulus is guilty and probably saw his truck that night on the beach during the disposal.  You read it here first.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 06:21:38 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Does anyone else besides me think this is a lame excuse for KJ to remove Carlo as Joran's attorney?

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.


My thoughts are that John Carlo may have been onto the fact that they were framing the security guards for the disappearance so he went to give them some legal advice or possibly attempt to represent them.  So the PROSECUTROR'S needed to get him put somewhere that he couldnt interfere with their little scam.  Then Paulus was put in place to make sure he kept quiet.


I keep calling him John Carlo because I know a John Carlo.  I mean ANTONIO Carlo

GRRRRR!!!!!


I think Antonio Carlo went to see the security guards:  (1)  They were somewhere in the vicinity and he wanted to know what they knew.  (2)  They were arrested in order for Paulus and Antonio to be able to quetion them.  (3)  Karin Janssen figured out a way to get them behind bars so that they would not be out on the streets talking.  (4)  Whatever information they had was worth it to Paulus for him to pay Carlo to presents Johns & Jones, and use legal wrangling to keep them in jail for a while so they could get their stories straight before the Sporter and Paulus were incarcerated.  (5)  I think Paulus knows something on Johns & Jones, maybe nothing significant, but enough to keep them quiet, because both o them know Paulus is guilty and probably saw his truck that night on the beach during the disposal.  You read it here first.


you heard me agree with this FIRST

 8)  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 06:27:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


Does anyone else besides me think this is a lame excuse for KJ to remove Carlo as Joran's attorney?

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Yes I do think it is an excuse to remove Carlo.  A year and a half later we are still find out all their lies.

Karin Janssen is corrupt as they come and I believe she is Paulus' mistress.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 06:39:30 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


I remember vividly how Antonio Carlo re-acted so curiously defensive when an American reporter caught up with him early on in this case and asked him if he was still Joran's attorney...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 06:42:09 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


 :lol: I have quarter-Dutch children but stress their maternal Scottish & Brit genes.  :lol: Actally, "Tater-Head" aptly describes former mother-in-law. :lol:


I think one of the biggest problems facing this country now and even more in the future is all the people who are born and raised here but still think of themselves as being from another country.

Irag and several countries around the world are fighting and dividing over 'sectarian/ethinic' lines.

I can see the same occuring here and causing much pain and division.


Carnut: Studying & learning one's genealogical historical heritage is a good thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 06:43:51 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I had known about Antonio Carlo's being removed from the case. It never made sense that it was done because he apparently visited one of the security guards......but if he had met with KJ, and "cleared his conscience"., as Mr. DeVries stated........now that might make sense.....
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://tinyurl.com/tef95

Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.


I remember vividly how Antonio Carlo re-acted so curiously defensive when an American reporter caught up with him early on in this case and asked him if he was still Joran's attorney...


Carlo seems to be a weak link and it is clear that he knows exactly what happened to Natalee.  Maybe some pressure on this guy will make him spill the beans.  I wonder what the Ducth investigators, or DeVries can do to turn up some heat on this guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 06:44:20 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.


My theory is that some people like to have something to be against. If space aliens invaded us tomorrow, I bet all the earthlings would join together as one people and be against the space aliens instead of each other.


Actually, I think I've met some really fun space aliens in my time... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 07:07:02 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


Ah...Hello Maine Penobscot!  I have some Algonquin ( from one of the Canadian Algonquin tribes ) blood within my veins as well !! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 07:07:59 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


Ah...Hello Maine Penobscot!  I have some Algonquin ( from one of the Canadian Algonquin tribes ) blood within my veins as well !! :D


and space cadets.... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 07:10:08 PM
They are trying to run the clock out with the two-year statute of limitations on rape/murder, whatever in that country, Aruba, lawless hell hole that it is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 07:11:05 PM
Quote from: "KackyLacky"
Hi ya'll!

I have been reading and keeping up. I was so proud the other night when Beth basically complimented the work done by you guys in gathering and publishing information about Natalee.

mrd red-----------my prayers are so with you and your Dad.


Kacky Lacky: I have wondered how and where you were!  Merry Christmas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 07:13:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
They are trying to run the clock out with the two-year statute of limitations on rape/murder, whatever in that country, Aruba, lawless hell hole that it is.

I agree Tyler.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 07:13:57 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


They will all be given a free pass.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 07:16:15 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


They will all be given a free pass.


there will, some day, be a national holliday in aruba in their honor


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 07:28:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by AB on the front page of SM:

I’m from the Netherlands. First I saw the show of Peter R. de Vries, see #27.
Now Peter R. de Vries was interviewed on TV by Robert Jensen, he is the ‘Dutch David Letterman’ with a a lot of Dutch viewers. Jensen also had Beth Twitty live on the phone.

Jensen asked Peter R. de Vries: “What do you think happend?”
And de Vries had this very good anwear. He said: “I just have a very long list of facts and the facts speak for themselves”. I think this kind of media attention in The Netherlands is very good for this case.
He also said: “I was only on Aruba for a few days with one other person and I have all this information, I wonder what happens if The Netherlands are sending a whole team for a few weeks…”

A friend of mine is living in Arnhem near Zevenaar, the place where Joran is living, and she said to me that it’s the talk of the day over there.

Just want to share…
ab


This is encouraging to me, because, however I have chosen to wittily & lightly critique the Dutch nature, they, by nature, are extremely intelligent and are very quick to defend the innocent, once the facts are compelling. This is one reason why failure to prosecute this case in a timely manner has been so blatantly shocking to me....what the hell goes on in Aruba ??????????? Holland: Wake up! Aruba is giving you a very bad name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: COLOMBO on November 29, 2006, 07:31:19 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "igsigs"
At the time, Janssen said that Carlo interviewing the security guard was very detrimental to the case. It gave Joran insight into what the new K2 story was.

Bottom Line - Antonio Carlo was willing to break the law and put his career in jeopordy to assist Joran. I suspect the list of people who did the same is extensive.


the security guards were released on the 13th.  Did Carlo talk to them after they were released?  If so, how was talking to the, breaking the law?

It seems to me if he did break the law it was to rat Joran out by telling Jansen he was involved in the disappearance.




SG released on the 13th:

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 10:36 am
The boy was picked up at 23:00 on Sunday at Mickey D’s. Sneaked out later. Was on time for school. Don’t mix things up.
(interesting choice of words-what happens when you DO mix things up)

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 10:35 am P 1181
Anybody wants a blessing from Saint Alibi?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:57 pm
The waters are low. The street are full. The night of Saint John.[/u] The fires will burn all around on the island (Light the fires!). The smoke will clear tomorrow morning.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:59 pm
The fires burned high and bright. Even Saint John denied he knew. The smoke will clear soon.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
Simian, older PVDS had one or two cards up his sleeve. They have been played, and lost. Will one of the cards sing?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
(1) The music man’s song was not on the bill.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:09 pm
(2) Simian, who else plays in the orchestra? A Babylonian….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:14 pm
Simian, The Sumerians do not like the Babylonian intrusion.
The Babylonian card may be tossed from the table and crushed under Sumerian feet (or feat)….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
DirtyHand knows the Babylonians that provided escort after the 2 shivas left

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:18 pm
If the Alibi is broken by DirtyHand the walls of Babylon will shake

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:53 pm
DirtyHand is the key
He walks with the elders
He walks in all houses
And he walked with the fallen elder
he was the hidden card that was played

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 11:23 pm
Who took the boy to the party? Who took him home? Therein lies the third act. Look up the Simian’s posts from days ago.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 07:39:54 PM
Posted by Victor at FOB regarding the photoshopped picture:

I saw him on Jensen tonight and he talked about the picture. He said the tip was given to him by the person who made the pic and who claimed a friend of Joran had ordered to have the picture made.

He said about the picture, since he seems to believe it was indeed a friend of Joran who had the picture made (wasn't it a gmail adress? a provider emailadress would not even prove who ordered it but that aside).

De Vries unlike Daniel did NOT say he felt there were sinister motives behind the picture (such as creating false evidence), he said that if Joran knew about it (since he was in the cc, which I saw was a gmail adress) that it was not a respectable thing to do since the girl probably passed away was missing etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 07:46:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by All10Suspects at RU:

http://tinyurl.com/tef95


(snipped)
Also Friday, the court barred van der Sloot's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, from visiting the teen, effectively removing him from the case, said Attorney General spokeswoman Mariaine Croes.

As a result, the van der Sloots retained two more attorneys for the defense of their son, Richie Kock and Arjan Debie.

The court granted prosecutors' request to remove Carlo because he had visited one of two former security guards who had been detained and released in the case, authorities said.

Croes said the Dutch teenager has a team of lawyers, so Carlo's removal will not leave van der Sloot without representation. The spokeswoman is not related to Steve Croes.

Carlo did not return calls seeking comment.

So Antonio Carlo was removed from the case around June 17, 2005.
Was this after is meeting with KJ? Could this mean he really did have
a meeting with KJ saying Joran had something to to with KJ?


No doubt the press release regarding Carlo having visited one of the two security guards was the 'cover story' for what was really going on behind the scenes with his contact, etc. with KJ ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 07:50:30 PM
Quote from: "COLOMBO"


SG released on the 13th:

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 10:36 am
The boy was picked up at 23:00 on Sunday at Mickey D’s. Sneaked out later. Was on time for school. Don’t mix things up.
(interesting choice of words-what happens when you DO mix things up)

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 10:35 am P 1181
Anybody wants a blessing from Saint Alibi?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:57 pm
The waters are low. The street are full. The night of Saint John.[/u] The fires will burn all around on the island (Light the fires!). The smoke will clear tomorrow morning.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:59 pm
The fires burned high and bright. Even Saint John denied he knew. The smoke will clear soon.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
Simian, older PVDS had one or two cards up his sleeve. They have been played, and lost. Will one of the cards sing?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
(1) The music man’s song was not on the bill.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:09 pm
(2) Simian, who else plays in the orchestra? A Babylonian….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:14 pm
Simian, The Sumerians do not like the Babylonian intrusion.
The Babylonian card may be tossed from the table and crushed under Sumerian feet (or feat)….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
DirtyHand knows the Babylonians that provided escort after the 2 shivas left

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:18 pm
If the Alibi is broken by DirtyHand the walls of Babylon will shake

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:53 pm
DirtyHand is the key
He walks with the elders
He walks in all houses
And he walked with the fallen elder
he was the hidden card that was played

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 11:23 pm
Who took the boy to the party? Who took him home? Therein lies the third act. Look up the Simian’s posts from days ago.



I have just read this thing about 3 and a half times and I just dont know what I'm supposed to be getting out of it  

 :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 07:52:43 PM
I'm getting very confused by this Carlo/Janssen thing.

If DeVries information is correct, then this is how I see it (and it's a feminine perspective so, of course it has that relational slant  :wink: ).

Antonio Carlo is Joran's attorney and at some point he realizes that Joran is heavily involved, or even guilty of murder, etc. etc.  

Instead of removing himself from the case, he secretly goes to Janssen and tells her Joran is guilty, and that she has to be the one to find the proof. He wants justice to be served, or something that seems to be noble, but why doesn't he just resign from the case? Is he afraid? Also, he must have trusted Janssen to stick his neck out like this, but boy was he mistaken!

Janssen goes and summarizes everything that transpired in writing!? Whoa! To me that sounds like Janssen was sending a loud message to Carlo. I wonder if this was when he realized he was in trouble. She had to have known that Carlo's secret meeting with her wasn't something to put in writing. Wouldn't she??

Just say that JVDS now knows that Carlo not only thought J was guilty, but was trying to make sure he got convicted. That is no small thing. I can't imagine JVDS would retain Carlo as Joran's lawyer. Carlo is now a HUGE problem. However, PVDS is then hired by Carlo's law office and for the last year the two have been working together. Who was responsible for hiring PVDS? Wouldn't that be a very threatening move towards Carlo?

Can you imagine the two of them going to work everyday, passing each other in the hall, etc.? I sure can't. This wasn't just a little misunderstanding between them. PVDS would do anything to help his son.

So, if what DeVries relayed is true, I can only conclude that Carlo must be a very frightened man.

Feel free to help me out here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 07:53:18 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
At the time, Janssen said that Carlo interviewing the security guard was very detrimental to the case. It gave Joran insight into what the new K2 story was.

Bottom Line - Antonio Carlo was willing to break the law and put his career in jeopordy to assist Joran. I suspect the list of people who did the same is extensive.


Well...actually, from the very first reports of this, I never ever believed that Antonio Carlo was stupid enough to visit the security guards. And I bet I wasn't the only one....that was a cover story..................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 07:55:43 PM
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 07:59:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.


Is your burial insurance paid up, Klaas?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   The kids are going to love it!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 07:59:43 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I'm getting very confused by this Carlo/Janssen thing.

If DeVries information is correct, then this is how I see it (and it's a feminine perspective so, of course it has that relational slant  :wink: ).

Antonio Carlo is Joran's attorney and at some point he realizes that Joran is heavily involved, or even guilty of murder, etc. etc.  

Instead of removing himself from the case, he secretly goes to Janssen and tells her Joran is guilty, and that she has to be the one to find the proof. He wants justice to be served, or something that seems to be noble, but why doesn't he just resign from the case? Is he afraid? Also, he must have trusted Janssen to stick his neck out like this, but boy was he mistaken!

Janssen goes and summarizes everything that transpired in writing!? Whoa! To me that sounds like Janssen was sending a loud message to Carlo. I wonder if this was when he realized he was in trouble. She had to have known that Carlo's secret meeting with her wasn't something to put in writing. Wouldn't she??

Just say that JVDS now knows that Carlo not only thought J was guilty, but was trying to make sure he got convicted. That is no small thing. I can't imagine JVDS would retain Carlo as Joran's lawyer. Carlo is now a HUGE problem. However, PVDS is then hired by Carlo's law office and for the last year the two have been working together. Who was responsible for hiring PVDS? Wouldn't that be a very threatening move towards Carlo?

Can you imagine the two of them going to work everyday, passing each other in the hall, etc.? I sure can't. This wasn't just a little misunderstanding between them. PVDS would do anything to help his son.

So, if what DeVries relayed is true, I can only conclude that Carlo must be a very frightened man.

Feel free to help me out here.


your not confused at all, you nailed it all together pretty good.  I say, have Devries dig into Carlo and find some dirt.  Then put the weight of the world on him and he will sing like a bird.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 08:00:57 PM
Tylergal -  :lol: Yeah, she's going to kill us, but afterall, Christmas is for the kids right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 08:01:55 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
if you were born in america

why cant we call ourselves NATIVE AMERICANS

 8)


Yep, another PC term used inappropiately by a group who can't give up on the fact that a bunch of Europeans came to this continent and populated it.

And yes, born here means NATIVE AMERICAN to me.

Could care less what my ancesters did to anyone or where they came from.



Native American in my personal opinion means Indian decent. NOT Eastern Indian...as in India. Native American is to me my homage.....real life Indians on the plains, in the USA........doing whatever they do. I, here in the USA, look at Indians as Americans. American-Indian.....get it?? I am one. I am from the Penobscot tribe of Maine which was from Canada in a different name. I claim my Penobscot heritage.
Sorry if I offend anyone here......I do not understand why heritage of peeps is an issue.....shouldn't be. I want justice for Natalee and her family. Let's move on.


Ah...Hello Maine Penobscot!  I have some Algonquin ( from one of the Canadian Algonquin tribes ) blood within my veins as well !! :D


and space cadets.... :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 08:02:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.


hahahaha you are just like me, I buy me neice and nephews the loudest, most obnoxios things I can find (3 boys and a girl)

One year I bought them this laser tag game, made all kinds of noise plus I figured they would be running around the house all winter tearing the place up playing this game !! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: lexie on November 29, 2006, 08:04:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.


LOL, Klaas!  My twins were the first grandchildren on both sides.  All 6 childless or unmarried siblings gave them electronic juke boxes, "real" sounds lawn mowers, etc.  Of course, you cannnot give them ONE to SHARE.... must have two of everything.   Their first 3 Christmases were extrememly NOISY!  But, after the rest of the siblings had kids, they all wanted to SUGGEST books, etc for my gifts to their kids.  HA HA  No Way!  I had great fun shopping for all those kids!  I had not thought about that in a long time... my twins just turned 31, and the youngest of the siblings' children is now 20.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 08:07:43 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
They are trying to run the clock out with the two-year statute of limitations on rape/murder, whatever in that country, Aruba, lawless hell hole that it is.


Yes..I agree. They could care less on Aruba regarding right and wrong. They thumb their collective noses at God and His Ten Commandments, justice and juris prudence. Western Civilzation and it's benevolent blessings do not reside on Aruba. Travelers: Beware....Pirates still roam on Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 08:09:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.

Gee I think I want one for Christmas :lol: .

I hope you bought earplugs for your sister-in-law.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 08:09:44 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


 :lol: I have quarter-Dutch children but stress their maternal Scottish & Brit genes.  :lol: Actally, "Tater-Head" aptly describes former mother-in-law. :lol:


I think one of the biggest problems facing this country now and even more in the future is all the people who are born and raised here but still think of themselves as being from another country.

Irag and several countries around the world are fighting and dividing over 'sectarian/ethinic' lines.

I can see the same occuring here and causing much pain and division.


Carnut: Studying & learning one's genealogical historical heritage is a good thing.


I'm sure it's a nice hobby, just like the study of history in general, but that's not what I'm talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 08:15:15 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Big day tomorrow for J2K (yes, Joran also...according to MF/Carlo).

Any predictions?


They will all be given a free pass.


there will, some day, be a national holliday in aruba in their honor


Dear God...that is a revolting thought. You're most likely correct.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 08:18:20 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.

Gee I think I want one for Christmas :lol: .

I hope you bought earplugs for your sister-in-law.

Honestly, I think my sister inlaw is louder than the kids.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 08:20:39 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "COLOMBO"


SG released on the 13th:

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 10:36 am
The boy was picked up at 23:00 on Sunday at Mickey D’s. Sneaked out later. Was on time for school. Don’t mix things up.
(interesting choice of words-what happens when you DO mix things up)

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 10:35 am P 1181
Anybody wants a blessing from Saint Alibi?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:57 pm
The waters are low. The street are full. The night of Saint John.[/u] The fires will burn all around on the island (Light the fires!). The smoke will clear tomorrow morning.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:59 pm
The fires burned high and bright. Even Saint John denied he knew. The smoke will clear soon.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
Simian, older PVDS had one or two cards up his sleeve. They have been played, and lost. Will one of the cards sing?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
(1) The music man’s song was not on the bill.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:09 pm
(2) Simian, who else plays in the orchestra? A Babylonian….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:14 pm
Simian, The Sumerians do not like the Babylonian intrusion.
The Babylonian card may be tossed from the table and crushed under Sumerian feet (or feat)….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
DirtyHand knows the Babylonians that provided escort after the 2 shivas left

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:18 pm
If the Alibi is broken by DirtyHand the walls of Babylon will shake

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:53 pm
DirtyHand is the key
He walks with the elders
He walks in all houses
And he walked with the fallen elder
he was the hidden card that was played

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 11:23 pm
Who took the boy to the party? Who took him home? Therein lies the third act. Look up the Simian’s posts from days ago.



I have just read this thing about 3 and a half times and I just dont know what I'm supposed to be getting out of it  

 :?


 :D OMG Blah, thank you for saying this..... :D I really did try to decipher this...but could not and figured I had finally lost my reasoning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 08:28:31 PM
Quote from: "blah"
your not confused at all, you nailed it all together pretty good.  I say, have Devries dig into Carlo and find some dirt.  Then put the weight of the world on him and he will sing like a bird.


Thanks Blah! I feel much better.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 08:30:15 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "blah"
your not confused at all, you nailed it all together pretty good.  I say, have Devries dig into Carlo and find some dirt.  Then put the weight of the world on him and he will sing like a bird.


Thanks Blah! I feel much better.  :lol:


I meant to add, I'm kinda worried that Carlo will have a heart attack or get disappeared.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 08:35:19 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "blah"
your not confused at all, you nailed it all together pretty good.  I say, have Devries dig into Carlo and find some dirt.  Then put the weight of the world on him and he will sing like a bird.


Thanks Blah! I feel much better.  :lol:


I meant to add, I'm kinda worried that Carlo will have a heart attack or get disappeared.  :?


Or commit suicide.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 08:36:09 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "COLOMBO"


SG released on the 13th:

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 10:36 am
The boy was picked up at 23:00 on Sunday at Mickey D’s. Sneaked out later. Was on time for school. Don’t mix things up.
(interesting choice of words-what happens when you DO mix things up)

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 10:35 am P 1181
Anybody wants a blessing from Saint Alibi?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:57 pm
The waters are low. The street are full. The night of Saint John.[/u] The fires will burn all around on the island (Light the fires!). The smoke will clear tomorrow morning.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:59 pm
The fires burned high and bright. Even Saint John denied he knew. The smoke will clear soon.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
Simian, older PVDS had one or two cards up his sleeve. They have been played, and lost. Will one of the cards sing?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
(1) The music man’s song was not on the bill.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:09 pm
(2) Simian, who else plays in the orchestra? A Babylonian….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:14 pm
Simian, The Sumerians do not like the Babylonian intrusion.
The Babylonian card may be tossed from the table and crushed under Sumerian feet (or feat)….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
DirtyHand knows the Babylonians that provided escort after the 2 shivas left

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:18 pm
If the Alibi is broken by DirtyHand the walls of Babylon will shake

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:53 pm
DirtyHand is the key
He walks with the elders
He walks in all houses
And he walked with the fallen elder
he was the hidden card that was played

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 11:23 pm
Who took the boy to the party? Who took him home? Therein lies the third act. Look up the Simian’s posts from days ago.



I have just read this thing about 3 and a half times and I just dont know what I'm supposed to be getting out of it  

 :?


 :D OMG Blah, thank you for saying this..... :D I really did try to decipher this...but could not and figured I had finally lost my reasoning.

I'm confused also but then again that's not too hard.

The thing I'm trying to figure out is who walks in all the houses with the elders and fallen elder.

I can think of two names Ben King and Bob Witt.  They were both at the Van der Sloot house, work in the court house and are friends with other elders.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 29, 2006, 08:40:28 PM
well the 1st line discredits the whole thing for me as it was impossible for Joran to have been picked up at 11:00 at McDonalds.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 08:40:29 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "blah"
your not confused at all, you nailed it all together pretty good.  I say, have Devries dig into Carlo and find some dirt.  Then put the weight of the world on him and he will sing like a bird.


Thanks Blah! I feel much better.  :lol:


I meant to add, I'm kinda worried that Carlo will have a heart attack or get disappeared.  :?


Or commit suicide.


uh huh  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 29, 2006, 08:43:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tylergal -  :lol: Yeah, she's going to kill us, but afterall, Christmas is for the kids right?


PLEASE send me that link  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 08:44:15 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I'm getting very confused by this Carlo/Janssen thing.

If DeVries information is correct, then this is how I see it (and it's a feminine perspective so, of course it has that relational slant  :wink: ).

Antonio Carlo is Joran's attorney and at some point he realizes that Joran is heavily involved, or even guilty of murder, etc. etc.  

Instead of removing himself from the case, he secretly goes to Janssen and tells her Joran is guilty, and that she has to be the one to find the proof. He wants justice to be served, or something that seems to be noble, but why doesn't he just resign from the case? Is he afraid? Also, he must have trusted Janssen to stick his neck out like this, but boy was he mistaken!

Janssen goes and summarizes everything that transpired in writing!? Whoa! To me that sounds like Janssen was sending a loud message to Carlo. I wonder if this was when he realized he was in trouble. She had to have known that Carlo's secret meeting with her wasn't something to put in writing. Wouldn't she??

Just say that PVDS now knows that Carlo not only thought J was guilty, but was trying to make sure he got convicted. That is no small thing. I can't imagine PVDS would retain Carlo as Joran's lawyer. Carlo is now a HUGE problem. However, PVDS is then hired by Carlo's law office and for the last year the two have been working together. Who was responsible for hiring PVDS? Wouldn't that be a very threatening move towards Carlo?

Can you imagine the two of them going to work everyday, passing each other in the hall, etc.? I sure can't. This wasn't just a little misunderstanding between them. PVDS would do anything to help his son.

So, if what DeVries relayed is true, I can only conclude that Carlo must be a very frightened man.

Feel free to help me out here.


Sorry, typed JVDS when I meant PVDS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 08:57:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tylergal -  :lol: Yeah, she's going to kill us, but afterall, Christmas is for the kids right?


I gave the second grandchild a "real" drumset at age 4.  He was already playing with his dad's band, so I felt he needed adequate equipment.  #2 son told me I never did that much for him.  I told him, "Oh, but I did a lot for you by not giving you a drum set at that age; otherwise, I might have had to kill me and you both."   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 08:59:02 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "blah"
your not confused at all, you nailed it all together pretty good.  I say, have Devries dig into Carlo and find some dirt.  Then put the weight of the world on him and he will sing like a bird.


Thanks Blah! I feel much better.  :lol:


I meant to add, I'm kinda worried that Carlo will have a heart attack or get disappeared.  :?


Or commit suicide.


That suicide in Aruba is only outranked by Dengue fever, but running it a close second.  The way it is spreading, I say it may overtake Dengue fever by year's end.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 09:00:28 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tylergal -  :lol: Yeah, she's going to kill us, but afterall, Christmas is for the kids right?


PLEASE send me that link  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


http://www.casuallivingusa.com

Product # 541444


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 09:02:10 PM
Colombo
Okay, I will concede your idea this time.  I am beginning to understand that you could be right...I thought the very same thing when I read Tylergal's post earlier... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 09:02:56 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


 :lol: I have quarter-Dutch children but stress their maternal Scottish & Brit genes.  :lol: Actally, "Tater-Head" aptly describes former mother-in-law. :lol:


I think one of the biggest problems facing this country now and even more in the future is all the people who are born and raised here but still think of themselves as being from another country.

Irag and several countries around the world are fighting and dividing over 'sectarian/ethinic' lines.

I can see the same occuring here and causing much pain and division.


Carnut: Studying & learning one's genealogical historical heritage is a good thing.


I'm sure it's a nice hobby, just like the study of history in general, but that's not what I'm talking about.


I think Carnut is referring to "balkanizing" the USA by separating ourselves into ethnic groups and becoming hyphenated Americans instead of "Americans."  Those of us born here who pay the taxes and preserve the country, "we are the native Americans" and we should not hyphenate our names to reflect otherwise???? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 29, 2006, 09:05:39 PM
Wonder what the Sloots think about this whole new interest in showing the world that they murdered Natalee Hollaway.
Gotta wonder, thinking back to March - April when DumPig produce his theory that Natalee OD'd on her own. I'm sure they were thinking this will finally go away.  But they still had the Civil Suit hanging over their heads. Then that went away.
Now VanDries has brought the whole case back to boil, and I can't help but wonder what the VanDerSloots are feeling now.  
This is a nightmare to them that won't go away.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 29, 2006, 09:07:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Colombo
Okay, I will concede your idea this time.  I am beginning to understand that you could be right...I thought the very same thing when I read Tylergal's post earlier... :wink:


Hey Lalas's, you little tangoer you. Would you please translate that for us folks who are not such good dancers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:08:59 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Wonder what the Sloots think about this whole new interest in showing the world that they murdered Natalee Hollaway.
Gotta wonder, thinking back to March - April when DumPig produce his theory that Natalee OD'd on her own. I'm sure they were thinking this will finally go away.  But they still had the Civil Suit hanging over their heads. Then that went away.
Now VanDries has brought the whole case back to boil, and I can't help but wonder what the VanDerSloots are feeling now.  
This is a nightmare to them that won't go away.


Kind of the way it ought to be, don'tcha think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 29, 2006, 09:09:23 PM
Mrs. Red, your father and your family are in my prayers...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:09:44 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Colombo
Okay, I will concede your idea this time.  I am beginning to understand that you could be right...I thought the very same thing when I read Tylergal's post earlier... :wink:


Hey Lalas's, you little tangoer you. Would you please translate that for us folks who are not such good dancers?


I think Lala's is doing a little leg pulling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: mishy on November 29, 2006, 09:10:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.


Oh Klaas, you are soooooo bad :lol:  :wink:  :wink:

I would kill my sis if she got my daughter that!! And I only have one!! :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 09:12:48 PM
BT
Hi there little doggie!  I am not sure I want to explain it at this time...not because I don't understand what he means, but because the answer tends to open a can of worms each time it is discussed.  Let me think about it. I just don't want to travel this road again with the same result.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 09:13:44 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Colombo
Okay, I will concede your idea this time.  I am beginning to understand that you could be right...I thought the very same thing when I read Tylergal's post earlier... :wink:


Hey Lalas's, you little tangoer you. Would you please translate that for us folks who are not such good dancers?


I think Lala's is doing a little leg pulling.


No I am not...I know what he means... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:14:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - my sister in law had twin boys rather late in life.  She is 50 and they are 3yrs old.   :shock:  I just ordered two of these for them for Christmas  :lol:  You don't think she'll mind do you??  :lol:

(http://www.casuallivingusa.com/images/products/541444.jpg)

Kids of all ages will love twisting their words into a whole new voice. Speaking into this translucent, hand held toy transforms their voice to sound like a robot, alien or spaceman. 8"L x 4 1/2"W x 7 1/4"H. Uses one 9 volt battery (included). Age 3 and up.


Never thought siblings could be so cruel. Does it amplify as well?

Actually wish I could of been so thoughtful when my nephew was young.

I did buy a electronic keyboard one year, but I was thinking it was a thoughtful gift at the time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:14:14 PM
From Deepak's June 13th statement:

From the story that we had told him, he believed us. To me and my parents he was always polite. When the case of the girl got more serious towards the end of the week, he had asked me whether or not my father had a lawyer. I said to him that he didn't. This was Thursday two weeks ago. That would be June 3, Thursday[/b] He had asked me if I knew a good attorney. I told him that I did not have a lot of experience with attorneys. He said to me that we shouldn't worry about it and that he would find a lawyer for me and my brother. Joran's father told me that same afternoon that he had hired Antoni Carlo to represent Joran.
.
On Friday two weeks ago he had arainged a lawyer for us.Friday, June 3th, 2005 That same afternoon approximately 16.30 hours, I had gone with my brother Satish to Joran's house. My mother had also come to Joran's house during her break from work. When my mother arrived, my mother and Joran's dad met for the first time and we went and sat down on the porch. My mother wanted to hear the story from Joran himself before she would believe our story. Joran then told the story about the Holiday Inn. Then Joran's father said to us that the situation could get better but also worse. Joran's father had asked my mother if we had an attorney. My mother said no, because we have never had any problems on Aruba. Joran's father said, wait I will find one for you and went in to get his hand-bag/briefcase. About a minute later he returned with his hand-bag/briefcase. He opened it and took out a piece of paper with several names on it. . Then Joran asked me if I wanted something to drink. I said yes. Joran and Satish got up and went and got something to drink. The father said to us that Oomen was a good lawyer and he picked up his mobile phone and called Oomen. Joran's father briefly spoke to Oomen and they had made an appointment for the next day, to be exact Saturday at 11.00 hours,. The father handed the phone to my mother and my mother had talked to Oomen.
a.) Carlo was hired Thursday June 2,2005
No one had been arrested yet. So whenever he saw the SG's, he was the lawyer for Joran according to this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 29, 2006, 09:16:20 PM
Question Question????

This hearing tomorrow is it to request release of just the kalpoes
or all 3 boys???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 29, 2006, 09:16:21 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Wonder what the Sloots think about this whole new interest in showing the world that they murdered Natalee Hollaway.
Gotta wonder, thinking back to March - April when DumPig produce his theory that Natalee OD'd on her own. I'm sure they were thinking this will finally go away.  But they still had the Civil Suit hanging over their heads. Then that went away.
Now VanDries has brought the whole case back to boil, and I can't help but wonder what the VanDerSloots are feeling now.  
This is a nightmare to them that won't go away.


Kind of the way it ought to be, don'tcha think?

Yep Nut, the Deman that won't go away. They'd love for all this to go away but it just won't.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:17:09 PM
a.) Carlo was hired Thursday June 2,2005
No one had been arrested yet. So whenever he saw the SG's, he was the lawyer for Joran according to this.


Klaasend, you are a devilish one ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 09:18:00 PM
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Question Question????

This hearing tomorrow is it to request release of just the kalpoes
or all 3 boys???


I was under the impression it was all 3.

I was also under the impression that the ruling still had something to do with the case PVDS brought against the ALE for his families damages including JVDS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:20:51 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


Yeah, S.T.F.U. or else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 29, 2006, 09:21:37 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
BT
Hi there little doggie!  I am not sure I want to explain it at this time...not because I don't understand what he means, but because the answer tends to open a can of worms each time it is discussed.  Let me think about it. I just don't want to travel this road again with the same result.


TY Lala's. I'll try to be patient, but you know how hyper us Boston Terriers are.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 09:21:39 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Question Question????

This hearing tomorrow is it to request release of just the kalpoes
or all 3 boys???


Depends upon who you ask.   Medleyrelay seems fairly certain it's all 3.  I've never seen anything official that includes Joran though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:23:10 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


Yeah, S.T.F.U. or else.


Naw, if Carlo actually did talk to the SG's, I'll bet it was to help confirm his own suspicions that JVDS was really the perp by assuring himself that the SG's weren't really involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:28:48 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:

I have no idea. But if the dates in Deepak's statements are correct about when A. Carlo was hired, why would he be having a conversation with them at all ? Maybe he went to see if the accusations were going to stick ?  Went to gather information. ? He is representing a witness, later who becomes a prime suspect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 29, 2006, 09:29:00 PM
I'm just going to take a stab here, but my gut feeling is that Aruba and the handful of crooked Dutch that are in control are going to release the Kalpoe's and eventually Kid-Rapist.  I really think those that are in control don't care about the future of Aruba, they are there to milk off the criminal activity that sustains the island and they are a little smarter and in control.  
If the bubble ever bursts, no skin off their backs, they just run back to Holland and pick up where they left off.  
The puppets that are 'supposedly' in charge just rant on and on about how they just need to pump more advertising dollars into the market to bring the economy back to normal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:32:46 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I'm just going to take a stab here, but my gut feeling is that Aruba and the handful of crooked Dutch that are in control are going to release the Kalpoe's and eventually Kid-Rapist.  I really think those that are in control don't care about the future of Aruba, they are there to milk off the criminal activity that sustains the island and they are a little smarter and in control.  
If the bubble ever bursts, no skin off their backs, they just run back to Holland and pick up where they left off.  
The puppets that are 'supposedly' in charge just rant on and on about how they just need to pump more advertising dollars into the market to bring the economy back to normal.


Kinda wondering the same thing.

Around here if a jury acquits then you can't be retried for the same crime without new circumstances being involved.

Wonder if a judge releasing the 3 perps is the equivalent of our acquittal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:35:50 PM
In Deepak's May 31 PV, he says he did not do narcotics with Natalee. He also says he did not see her do narcotics.
.
I would not be surprised if the K brothers are released from suspicion tomorrow. Whne Kock was on Dana's program, he said it was a case of saying to the prosecutor, put up or shut up.
I went back into the transcripts of the NG show. Where Carl Penhaul was reporting. My sense... same old bs then as now. Everyone from the Justice, ALE etc. all saying different things, unaware that the day or week before, someone else high up said the complete opposite.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 29, 2006, 09:36:45 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I'm just going to take a stab here, but my gut feeling is that Aruba and the handful of crooked Dutch that are in control are going to release the Kalpoe's and eventually Kid-Rapist.  I really think those that are in control don't care about the future of Aruba, they are there to milk off the criminal activity that sustains the island and they are a little smarter and in control.  
If the bubble ever bursts, no skin off their backs, they just run back to Holland and pick up where they left off.  
The puppets that are 'supposedly' in charge just rant on and on about how they just need to pump more advertising dollars into the market to bring the economy back to normal.


Many teepees will fall.  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 09:37:47 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Deepak's May 31 PV, he says he did not do narcotics with Natalee. He also says he did not see her do narcotics.
.
I would not be surprised if the K brothers are released from suspicion tomorrow. Whne Kock was on Dana's program, he said it was a case of saying to the prosecutor, put up or shut up.
I went back into the transcripts of the NG show. Where Carl Penhaul was reporting. My sense... same old bs then as now. Everyone from the Justice, ALE etc. all saying different things, unaware that the day or week before, someone else high up said the complete opposite.


Heh, heh, almost as bad as the U.S. govmt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 09:38:16 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "COLOMBO"


SG released on the 13th:

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 10:36 am
The boy was picked up at 23:00 on Sunday at Mickey D’s. Sneaked out later. Was on time for school. Don’t mix things up.
(interesting choice of words-what happens when you DO mix things up)

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 10:35 am P 1181
Anybody wants a blessing from Saint Alibi?

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 5:57 pm
The waters are low. The street are full. The night of Saint John.[/u] The fires will burn all around on the island (Light the fires!). The smoke will clear tomorrow morning.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:59 pm
The fires burned high and bright. Even Saint John denied he knew. The smoke will clear soon.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
Simian, older PVDS had one or two cards up his sleeve. They have been played, and lost. Will one of the cards sing?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 2:58 pm
(1) The music man’s song was not on the bill.

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:09 pm
(2) Simian, who else plays in the orchestra? A Babylonian….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:14 pm
Simian, The Sumerians do not like the Babylonian intrusion.
The Babylonian card may be tossed from the table and crushed under Sumerian feet (or feat)….

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
DirtyHand knows the Babylonians that provided escort after the 2 shivas left

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:18 pm
If the Alibi is broken by DirtyHand the walls of Babylon will shake

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:53 pm
DirtyHand is the key
He walks with the elders
He walks in all houses
And he walked with the fallen elder
he was the hidden card that was played

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 11:23 pm
Who took the boy to the party? Who took him home? Therein lies the third act. Look up the Simian’s posts from days ago.



I have just read this thing about 3 and a half times and I just dont know what I'm supposed to be getting out of it  

 :?


 :D OMG Blah, thank you for saying this..... :D I really did try to decipher this...but could not and figured I had finally lost my reasoning.

I'm confused also but then again that's not too hard.

The thing I'm trying to figure out is who walks in all the houses with the elders and fallen elder.

I can think of two names Ben King and Bob Witt.  They were both at the Van der Sloot house, work in the court house and are friends with other elders.


I just thought of another name: Paulus van der Sloot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:38:27 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I'm just going to take a stab here, but my gut feeling is that Aruba and the handful of crooked Dutch that are in control are going to release the Kalpoe's and eventually Kid-Rapist.  I really think those that are in control don't care about the future of Aruba, they are there to milk off the criminal activity that sustains the island and they are a little smarter and in control.  
If the bubble ever bursts, no skin off their backs, they just run back to Holland and pick up where they left off.  
The puppets that are 'supposedly' in charge just rant on and on about how they just need to pump more advertising dollars into the market to bring the economy back to normal.


Kinda wondering the same thing.

Around here if a jury acquits then you can't be retried for the same crime without new circumstances being involved.

Q: Wonder if a judge releasing the 3 perps is the equivalent of our acquittal.
[/b]
No, not on murder. But I think there is a time limit on LESSER charges being laid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 09:39:20 PM
The local FOX news station just had a sound bite about someone that knows something about Natalee but is not sharing.  Dave Holloway is to be on.  I will see if I can get more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:40:38 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The local FOX news station just had a sound bite about someone that knows something about Natalee but is not sharing.  Dave Holloway is to be on.  I will see if I can get more.

But you, lala's nice mom will share with your monkey buds ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 09:42:11 PM
Quote from: "blah"
well the 1st line discredits the whole thing for me as it was impossible for Joran to have been picked up at 11:00 at McDonalds.


Remember, right at the very first we heard that Paulus told Beth : " I picked THEM up at 4 a.m." And then several days later, after having scrutinized, he changed it to 11 p.m.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 09:44:22 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
well the 1st line discredits the whole thing for me as it was impossible for Joran to have been picked up at 11:00 at McDonalds.


Remember, right at the very first we heard that Paulus told Beth : " I picked THEM up at 4 a.m." And then several days later, after having scrutinized, he changed it to 11 p.m.



joran got home

turned on the PORN to GIVE himself an alibi

went back out to get rid of natalee

was out till 4......

missed school the next day

simple as pie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 09:47:57 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The local FOX news station just had a sound bite about someone that knows something about Natalee but is not sharing.  Dave Holloway is to be on.  I will see if I can get more.


Thanks Lala's - I'm turning on Fox here as well just in case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 09:49:45 PM
For all the Alabama monkeys it is Fox 6 in Birmingham at 9.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Hotshot on November 29, 2006, 09:50:50 PM
Quote
The thing I'm trying to figure out is who walks in all the houses with the elders and fallen elder.

I can think of two names Ben King and Bob Witt.  They were both at the Van der Sloot house, work in the court house and are friends with other elders.


I am with you San with Ben King!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 29, 2006, 09:51:21 PM
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 29, 2006, 09:51:27 PM
Evening all ~!!  :)

Klaas. can you please check your email.. TY..  the C one!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 09:52:18 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
well the 1st line discredits the whole thing for me as it was impossible for Joran to have been picked up at 11:00 at McDonalds.


Remember, right at the very first we heard that Paulus told Beth : " I picked THEM up at 4 a.m." And then several days later, after having scrutinized, he changed it to 11 p.m.



joran got home

turned on the PORN to GIVE himself an alibi

went back out to get rid of natalee

was out till 4......

missed school the next day

simple as pie

I am inclined to believe that. Since when is porn an alibi ?
What if Joran used a pay phone land line to call the house ? Unless there were toll charges, no record.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 09:53:01 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Well, Anna, we are quick to forget that being American means we could be from anywhere.  Yes, I have those half-Dutch children, but when they are bad, I know they are much Dutch than Brit!  I tell them that, too. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I say, "You are just like your daddy."  I never call him "Tater Head" to his face, however.


 :lol: I have quarter-Dutch children but stress their maternal Scottish & Brit genes.  :lol: Actally, "Tater-Head" aptly describes former mother-in-law. :lol:


I think one of the biggest problems facing this country now and even more in the future is all the people who are born and raised here but still think of themselves as being from another country.

Irag and several countries around the world are fighting and dividing over 'sectarian/ethinic' lines.

I can see the same occuring here and causing much pain and division.


Carnut: Studying & learning one's genealogical historical heritage is a good thing.


I'm sure it's a nice hobby, just like the study of history in general, but that's not what I'm talking about.


I think Carnut is referring to "balkanizing" the USA by separating ourselves into ethnic groups and becoming hyphenated Americans instead of "Americans."  Those of us born here who pay the taxes and preserve the country, "we are the native Americans" and we should not hyphenate our names to reflect otherwise???? :wink:


I take it that Carnut is asking us to ignore our own family heritage for the sake of his ideas of political correctness/rightousness. My first ancestors to settle here in the Colonies came to Jamestowne in 1609 and I daresay I can certainly remeber and study my history.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 29, 2006, 09:56:46 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Wonder what the Sloots think about this whole new interest in showing the world that they murdered Natalee Hollaway.
Gotta wonder, thinking back to March - April when DumPig produce his theory that Natalee OD'd on her own. I'm sure they were thinking this will finally go away.  But they still had the Civil Suit hanging over their heads. Then that went away.
Now VanDries has brought the whole case back to boil, and I can't help but wonder what the VanDerSloots are feeling now.  
This is a nightmare to them that won't go away.


As well it should be. Because of them, Natalee and her family have had to suffer hell on earth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 29, 2006, 10:00:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"
Question Question????

This hearing tomorrow is it to request release of just the kalpoes
or all 3 boys???


Depends upon who you ask.   Medleyrelay seems fairly certain it's all 3.  I've never seen anything official that includes Joran though.



I thought for sure when David Kock was on Dana's show it was just the
Kalpoe boys trying to be released


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:01:56 PM
There is also the uncertainty of the Dutch Police. Will they find something ? How bad will it be if they find something. But, there is no smoking gun. Unless, she is found. At this point, can't someone find a way to let the family bring her back ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:03:50 PM
That was my understanding also Sue, just the K-shit brothers.
I guess no one is going to have a come to Jesus moment .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Florida on November 29, 2006, 10:06:24 PM
IMO.... The Simian/Shango post points to Freddy....
It was not the Kalpoes that Joran got a ride with...He ran into Freddy & "someone" & knew he needed to get home to get himself an alibi eventually...
i.e. The sighting of a light colored car at the Racquet Club...With Joran in the driver's seat & 2 dark males with him. The car was ID'd as having round red brake lights with clear covers... :?
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/GregoryandFreddy-3.jpg)
Freddy & his best friend
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/GregoryTromp-6.jpg)
Gregory's car
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/gregtrompdj-1.jpg)
Gregory & g/f DJ'ing at Sasha's party

First, we heard Freddy spent the night at Joran's...Then the alibi was a family gathering in Curacao..... :?

"Freddy needs to tell the truth"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 10:09:25 PM
Fox6 News Birmingham

The story was about Carlo having information about what Joran knew about Natalee.  Dave Holloway says that "somedays you will finally break the case and then somedays you wonder if we will ever found out what happened."  

That was about it.  Nothing we didn't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 29, 2006, 10:10:02 PM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.

anybody?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 29, 2006, 10:11:36 PM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.

anybody?


Sorry crazymom.  I don't know.  Just didn't want you to think you are being ignored.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 10:13:10 PM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.

anybody?

Here you go.  Yap had it.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm?l=eng


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Florida on November 29, 2006, 10:15:25 PM
Another Candles Link
http://i.euniverse.com/funpages/cms_content/2529/4candles.swf


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 10:16:21 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Fox6 News Birmingham

The story was about Carlo having information about what Joran knew about Natalee.  Dave Holloway says that "somedays you will finally break the case and then somedays you wonder if we will ever found out what happened."  

That was about it.  Nothing we didn't know.

Thanks Lala's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 10:18:30 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Fox6 News Birmingham

The story was about Carlo having information about what Joran knew about Natalee.  Dave Holloway says that "somedays you will finally break the case and then somedays you wonder if we will ever found out what happened."  

That was about it.  Nothing we didn't know.


Heh, kinda like Beth said last night, everyone in the aruban Justice system knows what happened or they wouldn't be covering it up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 29, 2006, 10:19:06 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.

anybody?

Here you go.  Yap had it.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm?l=eng


Yap was hogging it all to herself?! :shock:  Bad monkey!   :wink:

No ciggies today!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 10:20:41 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.

anybody?

Here you go.  Yap had it.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm?l=eng


Yap was hogging it all to herself?! :shock:  Bad monkey!   :wink:

No ciggies today!

Congrats justins.  Keep it up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 10:20:45 PM
Something I picked up going after the Joran, Deepak, Satish
secret recording last night.

-------------------------------


Joran: The security guards guarantee me that they are going to
          kill you when they get out.

Deepak: Oh, yes.



---------------------------------

Is Joran letting us know here that he had communications with
the security guards? In KIA, through Antonio Carlo? :?:

How would Joran be able to communicate with the security
guards?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 10:20:54 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys....doing a quick drop by to see if anyone has the link for lighting candles site?  TIA.

anybody?

Here you go.  Yap had it.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/enter.cfm?l=eng


Yap was hogging it all to herself?! :shock:  Bad monkey!   :wink:

No ciggies today!


Heh, heh, congratulations whether you like it or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 10:22:31 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Something I picked up going after the Joran, Deepak, Satish
secret recording last night.

-------------------------------


Joran: The security guards guarantee me that they are going to
          kill you when they get out.

Deepak: Oh, yes.

---------------------------------

Is Joran letting us know here that he had communications with
the security guards? In KIA, through Antonio Carlo? :?:

How would Joran be able to communicate with the security
guards?


Heh, heh are you seriously asking that question?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 10:26:14 PM
Greta will have coverage tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 10:26:32 PM
Natalee Case will be on Greta after the next segment


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:26:57 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
IMO.... The Simian/Shango post points to Freddy....
It was not the Kalpoes that Joran got a ride with...He ran into Freddy & "someone" & knew he needed to get home to get himself an alibi eventually...
i.e. The sighting of a light colored car at the Racquet Club...With Joran in the driver's seat & 2 dark males with him. The car was ID'd as having round red brake lights with clear covers... :?
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/GregoryandFreddy-3.jpg)
Freddy & his best friend
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/GregoryTromp-6.jpg)
Gregory's car
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/gregtrompdj-1.jpg)
Gregory & g/f DJ'ing at Sasha's party

First, we heard Freddy spent the night at Joran's...Then the alibi was a family gathering in Curacao..... :?

"Freddy needs to tell the truth"

My guess is Guido as for running into.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 10:27:14 PM
Coming up after the break on Greta - more breaking developements, about K2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 29, 2006, 10:28:45 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
BT
Hi there little doggie!  I am not sure I want to explain it at this time...not because I don't understand what he means, but because the answer tends to open a can of worms each time it is discussed.  Let me think about it. I just don't want to travel this road again with the same result.


How about starting a thread about it?

What's wrong with Mrs.' folks?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:28:48 PM
Justins Mama... No cigs ! Whoo Hoo And I mean that ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 29, 2006, 10:33:54 PM
The Greta coverage is likely to just be a reminder of the hearing tomorrow.

Right now the DeVries front is our best hope. He has made more headway than anything else in the last 6 months.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazymom on November 29, 2006, 10:34:40 PM
Thanks for all the links.  Someone wanted to light a candle for Jaycee and her sisters.  If you would like to light one for them here is the link:
http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=JRH

Thanks all you wonderful monkeys.  I will be back in a couple of hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:35:05 PM
Guess, David Kock on the phone. He expects them to be released from suspicion. No case against them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:36:46 PM
Quote from: "sb"
The Greta coverage is likely to just be a reminder of the hearing tomorrow.

Right now the DeVries front is our best hope. He has made more headway than anything else in the last 6 months.

He seems to be motivated to solve and expose. The others are motivated to cover up and lie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: GabbyG on November 29, 2006, 10:36:58 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Imette St Guillen Case

NYPD blowtorched the plumbing out of Littlejohn's home for forensic examination.  They ripped up the floorboards, tore out the walls and sheetrock.

Of course they confiscated all the linens and laundry, all the plumbing traps, all the clothing -- everything.  

NYPD knew this was the guy, and they were gonna nail him.  And they did.

What happened at 19 Montana?

Just askin'.


Wow...way to say it Hammer...WTG!!  Gives rise to many questions doesnt it....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 10:38:14 PM
Dropped by to say hi, caught up on the reading, was here earlier. Memphis you look adorable in your Christmas finery, I forgot to tell you earlier. Glad everyone seems to be doing well here tonight.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: "GabbyG"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Imette St Guillen Case

NYPD blowtorched the plumbing out of Littlejohn's home for forensic examination.  They ripped up the floorboards, tore out the walls and sheetrock.

Of course they confiscated all the linens and laundry, all the plumbing traps, all the clothing -- everything.  

NYPD knew this was the guy, and they were gonna nail him.  And they did.

What happened at 19 Montana?

Just askin'.


Wow...way to say it Hammer...WTG!!  Gives rise to many questions doesnt it....


Kinda shows a difference in investigative technique between NYPD and ALE  Clown force.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 10:42:14 PM
Quote from: "GabbyG"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Imette St Guillen Case

NYPD blowtorched the plumbing out of Littlejohn's home for forensic examination.  They ripped up the floorboards, tore out the walls and sheetrock.

Of course they confiscated all the linens and laundry, all the plumbing traps, all the clothing -- everything.  

NYPD knew this was the guy, and they were gonna nail him.  And they did.

What happened at 19 Montana?

Just askin'.


Wow...way to say it Hammer...WTG!!  Gives rise to many questions doesnt it....



And representing the family of the victim in this would be???  Compare and contrast what happened at the apartment only of his other client.
Basically nothing.  A show in bunny suits for the cameras was about all.

So it isn't as though Joey T doesn't know what a proper search consists of.

Whoever blocked that search should be charged with obstruction of justice and prosecuted.  Witt and Ben King seem two culpable at least.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 10:44:25 PM
Aruba has squandered any iota of credibility
capital that they possibly had to spend.

From ODUBER

Right down to that lying sack of SH —

Joran’s mother - Anita Van der Sloot.

—————————————-

Thursday, June 23, 2005- On the Record
ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: So I spoke
with him (Joran) about these
things and just told him to stay
strong and to TELL THE TRUTH.

——————

On June 24th 2005, at approximately 10.00 hours,
There we, the reporting officers, were informed the suspect J.A.P. van der SLOOT refused to go with us… that his mother and his lawyer had advised him on behalf of his father to NOT MAKE any more statements and to invoke his right to not make statements.

————-

On FOX, Anita confides in Greta that she’s telling the SPORTER to tell the truth.

When we research what is really going on behind the scenes… she’s funneling
messages to Joran from Paulus
and Antonio Carlo. She is
advising the sporter
to shut his effin trap.

Quick Links:

FOX - GRETA ON THE RECORD
Thursday, June 23, 2005

http://tinyurl.com/czdyw

Joran ALE Statement 6/24/2005

http://tinyurl.com/yd3jt7

———

De Vries, are u looking at this????

———

UN-BELIEVABLE!

Justice 4 Natalee
Ann Holloway !

FOX - GRETA ( INTERVIEW - ANITA )

VAN SUSTEREN: When you meet with him, do you have a time limit?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: I have a time limit, yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: And who’s present?

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: With somebody, some of the officers is there, or the guards. AND IF I TALK ABOUT THE CASE, I CAN LEAVE.

Anita goes on to says she is telling Joran to tell the truth.

——————————–

6/24/2005 JORAN ALE Statements

snip it - (full link above)

- that he wouldn’t come with us today because his mother would be visiting him at 14.00 hours that day

- that if he gets a visit from his mother he would discuss making another statement WITH HER.

- that only if his father, by way of his lawyer would say he should make a statement he would do so!!!!!!! ?????????

- that he was waiting for the statement of his father and after that make another statement.

Of this, we, the reporting officers, on our oath of office, have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed in Oranjestad on June 24th 2005.

The reporting officers,

S.A. TROMP M.A.G. R

————-

THE MURDEROUS RAPING
VAN DER SLOOTS LIE…
AND THAT IS THE TRUTH!
IT IS FAMILY TRADITION.

Justice 4 Natalee Holloway!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 10:45:18 PM
I posted this earlier today - anybody on this shift who can help?

Someone help me out with this - For Natalee's yearbook, to accompany her class picture, she chose some lines from "Freebird". I *think* these are the lines - did she use all 4 of these? Anybody know FOR SURE?

Quote
If I leave here tomorrow
Would you still remember me?
For I must be travelling on, now,
'Cause there's too many places I've got to see.  



Thanks. (Another project I'm working on ... )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 10:45:51 PM
I thought the hearing tomorrow was for the 2K's but I now read a posting that Joran has a court date also. Posted by Debbie at BFN.....

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Suspects Hearing - November 30, 2006

Thursday, November 30th is the day the Kalpoe's go to court to ask to be cleared as suspects in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  I also hear that Joran has a hearing for the same purpose tomorrow.

I am hoping that since the Dutch Investigative Team has not made any of their finding known that the court will see the importance of not removing them as suspects at this time.

Please post your thoughts here and post any info you hear or read in this topic.

Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 10:47:08 PM
Whoever blocked that search should be charged with obstruction of justice and prosecuted. Witt and Ben King seem two culpable at least.
I think there was a disagreement about the wording of the search warrant
at the Sloot Sty. KJ did the search warant ? Did she just cave ? Or giggle and blush ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 10:49:26 PM
Jossy said they are going to court to be released as suspects.  They feel uncomfortable about that.

Karin Janssen will be there.

Jossy said they shouldn't be released.  They have until two years before they are released.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 29, 2006, 10:50:44 PM
You know, something I just thought of:

Beth basically says that ALL of ALE is involved. Events seem to be bearing that out.

It is one GREAT BIG UGLY THING that all those people are afraid of, in that NO ONE has cracked and claimed any reward $$$ or even hinted that they do know anything. In a situation like this, SOMEONE breaks ranks. Every time. But not here. There is no Frank Serpico to blow the whistle.

Tells you sort of indirectly, how ugly this thing is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 10:50:48 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I thought the hearing tomorrow was for the 2K's but I now read a posting that Joran has a court date also. Posted by Debbie at BFN.....

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Suspects Hearing - November 30, 2006

Thursday, November 30th is the day the Kalpoe's go to court to ask to be cleared as suspects in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  I also hear that Joran has a hearing for the same purpose tomorrow.

I am hoping that since the Dutch Investigative Team has not made any of their finding known that the court will see the importance of not removing them as suspects at this time.

Please post your thoughts here and post any info you hear or read in this topic.

Thanks!

The only one I know of that is saying Joran is also going to court tomorrow is Medleyrelay.  I don't know if it's true and they are trying to keep it quiet or if it's all BS and only the Kalpoe's will be there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 10:51:37 PM
Imagine that.  The poor Kalpoes feel uncomfortable about being suspects.  My god these people have no scruples.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 10:52:21 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
I posted this earlier today - anybody on this shift who can help?

Someone help me out with this - For Natalee's yearbook, to accompany her class picture, she chose some lines from "Freebird". I *think* these are the lines - did she use all 4 of these? Anybody know FOR SURE?

Quote
If I leave here tomorrow
Would you still remember me?
For I must be travelling on, now,
'Cause there's too many places I've got to see.  



Thanks. (Another project I'm working on ... )


Excerpt from Dave's book:

There I was in Aruba, a strange place, searching for my little girl, not knowing where she was, how she was, or what had happened to her. As I reflected on what the police had told me, I realized that they were trying to use the most innocent details to create a motive for Natalee to have voluntarily disappeared. For instance, they had somehow seen the quote that she had put in her high-school yearbook. It was from Lynyrd Skynyrd's song "Freebird":

If I leave here tomorrow
Would you still remember me?
For I must be traveling on now,
'Cause there's too many places I've got to see.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 10:52:29 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Whoever blocked that search should be charged with obstruction of justice and prosecuted. Witt and Ben King seem two culpable at least.
I think there was a disagreement about the wording of the search warrant
at the Sloot Sty. KJ did the search warant ? Did she just cave ? Or giggle and blush ?


At least once she chirped "Paulus wouldn't let us!" at which point she should have had ALE forcibly remove him from the premises and continue with the search.

Since she failed to do so, she, too, should be presecuted for obstruction of justice for she did have a number of members of ALE present and at her disposal.  Additional charges for her would be her failure/refusal to collect forensics from the three suspects in a timely manner.

This could have been done in ADDITION to wiretaps.  One does not automatically eliminate the use of the other.  So when they say they decided to use wiretaps INSTEAD it is nothing short of pure unadultrated BS.  And if they had to chose one, forensics would be by far and away the proper choice since the courts in Aruba apparently do not take anything less.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 10:54:28 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
BT
Hi there little doggie!  I am not sure I want to explain it at this time...not because I don't understand what he means, but because the answer tends to open a can of worms each time it is discussed.  Let me think about it. I just don't want to travel this road again with the same result.


How about starting a thread about it?

What's wrong with Mrs.' folks?



We already have one...only thing is only the Shangoheads read it.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 29, 2006, 10:54:33 PM
OT
Person of Interested Questioned in the Trenton Duckett Case.

Close friend of Melinda Duckett.

Article posted in Missing Persons Thread.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: GabbyG on November 29, 2006, 10:54:47 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"

We have to face the obvious where Joe Taco is concerned.  He is engaging in "lawyer's capitalism".  No matter what your client is guilty of, get him off and get your big payday.  Even if you have to out and out lie.  Make a name for yourself and get that big payday.  Greta is no better than Taco Boy.


But, as someone already stated, Joe T. is not Joran's lawyer. The civil case was thrown out. He is obviously doing damage control for Joran in the US. Why?

Step back and look at this. Joe T. came out swinging. He really tryed to paint Beth in a certain unfavorable light. He's doing some serious damage control.


It's kinda obvious Joe T. is functioning as a media defense for the entire aruban Dutch establishment.


I have to agree with you Carnut...I also think it goes way deeper then just the VDS's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 10:57:18 PM
the case in TOILETVILLE  also known as TOILET ISLAND

appears to be one of those situations that IF JORAN tells the truth about who was INVOLVED besides him, then that PERSON will implicate another person and that person implicates another and so on and so on.

now, let me ask you because there are people here that know a lot more than i do about the characters involved here...but here is the question

of all the SUSPECTS and people held for questioning
WHICH one of them has parents that have the HIGHEST position on  TOILETVILLE  

someone help me out
thanks,

your robotic friend   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 10:59:13 PM
also

i wonder if it is possible or even worth it to have a thread dedicated
ONLY to the SPECIFIC LIES concerning the case

only LIES that can be actually proven

YES

NO

MAYBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 29, 2006, 10:59:15 PM
Forensics are only as good as the people who are doing them. I suspect that ALE would have botched them if they HAD been allowed.

Look, guys, when the FIX is it, it covers all bases. There was never going to be a proper forensic exam because the powers that be were not wanting the extent of the corruption to come out... and VDS connections to the corruption.

Beth, along with so many of us, is so used to our way of doing things in the US that we really don't wrap our minds around the fact that Aruba plays by different rules.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:00:04 PM
,
As soon as the replacement for KJ takes office, I think someone should write this person both snail mail and email as ask why these charges against those who obstructed justice in this investigation have not been brought, etc. and we should keep the pressure on until we get answers on this.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 29, 2006, 11:00:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The only one I know of that is saying Joran is also going to court tomorrow is Medleyrelay.  I don't know if it's true and they are trying to keep it quiet or if it's all BS and only the Kalpoe's will be there.

MFposted an article where Carlo responds to the de Vries accusations. At the end of the article Carlo says that Joran has an 11/30 court date.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 11:01:43 PM
Actually, I have to wonder if being released as suspects might not be a good thing. There is no one left to watch over the Kalpoes, therefore just about ANYTHING could happen to them then.  You know unexplained car accidents, accidentally falling from a balconey, getting eaten by a shark while snorkling,  bad food resulting in food poisoning and the list goes on.  If I were them I would be making plans to leave One Crappy Island while they can...they know too much to continue to exist there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 29, 2006, 11:02:20 PM
Has it been brought up that tomorrow, 11/30, is precisely the 18-month mark since the crime?

What significance is that? We know about the 2-year thing...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:02:24 PM
.
So Joran doesn't have to be physically present for his court date and can be represented only by his attorney?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:02:36 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
BT
Hi there little doggie!  I am not sure I want to explain it at this time...not because I don't understand what he means, but because the answer tends to open a can of worms each time it is discussed.  Let me think about it. I just don't want to travel this road again with the same result.


How about starting a thread about it?

What's wrong with Mrs.' folks?



We already have one...only thing is only the Shangoheads read it.  :roll:


And the problem with that is?

You all trying to convert the unwashed masses to your theory or something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:02:42 PM
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:04:14 PM
Quote from: "robots"
also

i wonder if it is possible or even worth it to have a thread dedicated
ONLY to the SPECIFIC LIES concerning the case

only LIES that can be actually proven

YES

NO

MAYBE


I think it's a great idea.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:04:40 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
also

i wonder if it is possible or even worth it to have a thread dedicated
ONLY to the SPECIFIC LIES concerning the case

only LIES that can be actually proven

YES

NO

MAYBE


I think it's a great idea.


me 2  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:05:37 PM
1. drop off at holiday inn


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:06:01 PM
Quote from: "robots"
the case in TOILETVILLE  also known as TOILET ISLAND

appears to be one of those situations that IF JORAN tells the truth about who was INVOLVED besides him, then that PERSON will implicate another person and that person implicates another and so on and so on.

now, let me ask you because there are people here that know a lot more than i do about the characters involved here...but here is the question

of all the SUSPECTS and people held for questioning
WHICH one of them has parents that have the HIGHEST position on  TOILETVILLE  

someone help me out
thanks,

your robotic friend   8)

Could be Guido Wever's father.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:06:35 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Forensics are only as good as the people who are doing them. I suspect that ALE would have botched them if they HAD been allowed.

Look, guys, when the FIX is it, it covers all bases. There was never going to be a proper forensic exam because the powers that be were not wanting the extent of the corruption to come out... and VDS connections to the corruption.

Beth, along with so many of us, is so used to our way of doing things in the US that we really don't wrap our minds around the fact that Aruba plays by different rules.



But it's just one more thing to point to as the reason for continuing the boycott and keeping up the pressure.  I certainly doubt that he will run right out and arrest them on our say so but it does cast them in a certain light and scrutiny and one that is far less than the favorable one that they were hoping to retire on.

Their names need to be associated with the financial ruin of Aruba if we can do anything at all to cause it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 11:07:38 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
So Joran doesn't have to be physically present for his court date and can be represented only by his attorney?

.


Apparently Jossy was just on Greta and only mentioned court tomorrow for the 2K's so I am again not sure what it's to be.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:07:45 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
the case in TOILETVILLE  also known as TOILET ISLAND

appears to be one of those situations that IF JORAN tells the truth about who was INVOLVED besides him, then that PERSON will implicate another person and that person implicates another and so on and so on.

now, let me ask you because there are people here that know a lot more than i do about the characters involved here...but here is the question

of all the SUSPECTS and people held for questioning
WHICH one of them has parents that have the HIGHEST position on  TOILETVILLE  

someone help me out
thanks,

your robotic friend   8)

Could be Guido Wever's father.


ok, so is GUILDO'S father powerful ??

thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:07:48 PM
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:08:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "sb"
Forensics are only as good as the people who are doing them. I suspect that ALE would have botched them if they HAD been allowed.

Look, guys, when the FIX is it, it covers all bases. There was never going to be a proper forensic exam because the powers that be were not wanting the extent of the corruption to come out... and VDS connections to the corruption.

Beth, along with so many of us, is so used to our way of doing things in the US that we really don't wrap our minds around the fact that Aruba plays by different rules.



But it's just one more thing to point to as the reason for continuing the boycott and keeping up the pressure.  I certainly doubt that he will run right out and arrest them on our say so but it does cast them in a certain light and scrutiny and one that is far less than the favorable one that they were hoping to retire on.

Their names need to be associated with the financial ruin of Aruba if we can do anything at all to cause it.

.


Ah yes, aruban history books with a chapter on the Great VDS Scandal or The Great VDS Depression.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:08:48 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.


devries has more,, hopefully he will let more out after the IDIOTS
puke on their own shoes some more............. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 11:09:36 PM
Thank you bleached - I have the book, but didn't remember that he had included the yearbook quote.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:09:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.

I forgot who is father was.  I thought he worked for the government.  Anna knows who he is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:10:36 PM
I quoted the wrong post :lol:   Meant to do the one above.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:11:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "sb"
Forensics are only as good as the people who are doing them. I suspect that ALE would have botched them if they HAD been allowed.

Look, guys, when the FIX is it, it covers all bases. There was never going to be a proper forensic exam because the powers that be were not wanting the extent of the corruption to come out... and VDS connections to the corruption.

Beth, along with so many of us, is so used to our way of doing things in the US that we really don't wrap our minds around the fact that Aruba plays by different rules.



But it's just one more thing to point to as the reason for continuing the boycott and keeping up the pressure.  I certainly doubt that he will run right out and arrest them on our say so but it does cast them in a certain light and scrutiny and one that is far less than the favorable one that they were hoping to retire on.

Their names need to be associated with the financial ruin of Aruba if we can do anything at all to cause it.

.


Ah yes, aruban history books with a chapter on the Great VDS Scandal or The Great VDS Depression.



Perhaps not even a chapter in the history books but from the Front Page articles especially the one where the Aruban government is fighting with the Dutch over the proceeds of the sale of the buildings for the Marriott, you can bet it will go down in some folks memories.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 29, 2006, 11:11:44 PM
We are left pretty much with only the strategy of undermining Aruba's character and credibility, after the fact, in the hope it will make them look bad and will reduce their pocketbooks.

Their response, as it always is by the GUILTY, is to stall, delay, and confuse, and hope you can outlast your adversaries until the mass of people forget about what you have done or become preoccupied with other things, at which time things get back to normal for you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:12:57 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.


devries has more,, hopefully he will let more out after the IDIOTS
puke on their own shoes some more............. 8)


Number one idiot De Vries needs to make look like a fool is Joe Tacopina for all the names he call him on the Fox news show yesterday.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:13:28 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.


devries has more,, hopefully he will let more out after the IDIOTS
puke on their own shoes some more............. 8)


Number one idiot De Vries needs to make look like a fool is Joe Tacopina for all the names he call him on the Fox news show yesterday.



 8) yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:13:38 PM
Well, I hope that Devries can get or has some of the courts papers.
KJ will be going back to the NL soon, she won't hold out until Christmas, holidays and all that.
Everything about their court processes seems to be behind closed doors.
And the papers get Enron'd.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:14:43 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.

I forgot who is father was.  I thought he worked for the government.  Anna knows who he is.


Dr. Bushi Wever.  He is the Minister of Something or Other like Health and Human Resources might be in this country but I don't know his official title.

He is the one Jossy claims was stiffing the bars in Venezuela, too.  Rather nice looking man for Aruba and has his photo in the newspapers often.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: sb on November 29, 2006, 11:15:56 PM
Have DeVries and taco-boy really locked horns yet? Has DeVries mentioned him or called him out or brought him into the mix in any way? He has mantioned carlo, but not taco-boy as far as I have heard.

A face-to-face "country meetin'" between those two would be a sight to behold.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:16:11 PM
Wasn't Guido's father the head of a political party where no one voted for them. Then he went to work in a bank ? After Oduber got in ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 11:17:04 PM
yes, carnut...

LOL

I was seriously asking the SG question.


I have never heard Joran admit to contact with the SG's in any way.

Perhaps, I was out that day.


-------

I thought your comment from this morning was funny too.

"What do you have against nuts?"  :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/jjornaslanderbootBEAST.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 11:18:25 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thank you bleached - I have the book, but didn't remember that he had included the yearbook quote.


You are welcome msmarple anytime....anything to help with the work you do. You do a great job!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:19:27 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
[
Ah yes, aruban history books with a chapter on the Great VDS Scandal or The Great VDS Depression.



So are you saying you think it better to just pi$$ and moan and not even try to name names or point fingers?    Since we know we can't count on any of these people actually getting anything like the jail time they deserve, we should just do nothing so that things get back to normal more quickly for Aruba?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:19:39 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
yes, carnut...

LOL

I was seriously asking the SG question.


I have never heard Joran admit to contact with the SG's in any way.

Perhaps, I was out that day.


-------

I thought your comment from this morning was funny too.

"What do you have against nuts?"  :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/jjornaslanderbootBEAST.jpg)

One of the SG was in the same jail as Joran. Down the row. Mentioned crying in the cell. Maybe for Mommy. Or his pookie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:19:55 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
yes, carnut...

LOL

I was seriously asking the SG question.


I have never heard Joran admit to contact with the SG's in any way.

Perhaps, I was out that day.


-------

I thought your comment from this morning was funny too.

"What do you have against nuts?"  :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/jjornaslanderbootBEAST.jpg)




 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 29, 2006, 11:20:36 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Wasn't Guido's father the head of a political party where no one voted for them. Then he went to work in a bank ? After Oduber got in ?


Wever is as common a name as Croes and Oduber.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on November 29, 2006, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"


Do we know exactly when Carlo got spooked about his meeting with Janssen?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:04 pm
The wire has been shaken. The bird has left.


Very interesting question.  IIRC, Paulus was released around the 26th.  Didn't Joran refuse to give a statement around that time b/c he had to talk to his lawyer so that he wouldn't contradict what his Father said?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:24:24 PM
But I do remember Jossy mentioning it. Don't think I am mistaken. Not Booshi. Booshi, is an Aruban. Guido is Dutch. Tyler probably has it. She has everything. But, does it matter ?
KJ . Ben Vocking, Bob Witt, PVDSloot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 11:24:30 PM
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 11:24:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


The hall monitor knows, Colombo knows, but SandraK does not know. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 29, 2006, 11:25:36 PM
Luv the "Lover Lips" on the Louse!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:26:03 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
yes, carnut...

LOL

I was seriously asking the SG question.


I have never heard Joran admit to contact with the SG's in any way.

Perhaps, I was out that day.


-------

I thought your comment from this morning was funny too.

"What do you have against nuts?"  :lol:



Well, wasn't sure I liked your insulting my ethnic heritage.

Of course my response was facetious, think we can all see that JVDS pretty much could do what he wanted, whether it was actual physical contact and conversation or thru intermediarys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 11:26:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"
Question Question????

This hearing tomorrow is it to request release of just the kalpoes
or all 3 boys???


Depends upon who you ask.   Medleyrelay seems fairly certain it's all 3.  I've never seen anything official that includes Joran though.


Has she been playing that swimming to and fro again. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 11:26:44 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


Yeah, S.T.F.U. or else.


Naw, if Carlo actually did talk to the SG's, I'll bet it was to help confirm his own suspicions that JVDS was really the perp by assuring himself that the SG's weren't really involved.


Your first reply was the bingo. This one is the gong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 11:26:59 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
yes, carnut...

LOL

I was seriously asking the SG question.


I have never heard Joran admit to contact with the SG's in any way.

Perhaps, I was out that day.


-------

I thought your comment from this morning was funny too.

"What do you have against nuts?"  :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/jjornaslanderbootBEAST.jpg)

One of the SG was in the same jail as Joran. Down the row. Mentioned crying in the cell. Maybe for Mommy. Or his pookie.



Thanks, Kat Gram....


He reminds me of Linus and his Blankie.


Big galumphin 225 pound, 6 ft 5 oaf. WAHHHHHH!!!!

Who said big boys don't cry, huh? :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:27:38 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
But I do remember Jossy mentioning it. Don't think I am mistaken. Not Booshi. Booshi, is an Aruban. Guido is Dutch. Tyler probably has it. She has everything. But, does it matter ?
KJ . Ben Vocking, Bob Witt, PVDSloot.



He doesn't look Aruban to me but you may be right.  I am going by what Scubajap said and we know she is less than reliable.  Buschi is just his nickname and not on his birth certificate.

And he is some how connected with the landfill as well.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:27:53 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.

Yep. it has to be that. What else could it be ? One dirty hand washes the other. But, who could have forseen the determination of people ? And the family. Guess the family was expected to give up and go home and they just party on on the TOILET Island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 11:27:54 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I'm just going to take a stab here, but my gut feeling is that Aruba and the handful of crooked Dutch that are in control are going to release the Kalpoe's and eventually Kid-Rapist.  I really think those that are in control don't care about the future of Aruba, they are there to milk off the criminal activity that sustains the island and they are a little smarter and in control.  
If the bubble ever bursts, no skin off their backs, they just run back to Holland and pick up where they left off.  
The puppets that are 'supposedly' in charge just rant on and on about how they just need to pump more advertising dollars into the market to bring the economy back to normal.


Many teepees will fall.  8)


Remember when Dilbert or Dilbart or whatever his name is, was in NY back in the winter.......... :wink:  :wink:  :wink:  :wink:  making connections with Taco and relaying medleys...... :wink:  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:28:35 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
[
Ah yes, aruban history books with a chapter on the Great VDS Scandal or The Great VDS Depression.



So are you saying you think it better to just pi$$ and moan and not even try to name names or point fingers?    Since we know we can't count on any of these people actually getting anything like the jail time they deserve, we should just do nothing so that things get back to normal more quickly for Aruba?

.


Huh? Didn't think I was saying any such thing.

Thought I was agreeing with your statement of the VDS's being a major cause of aruba's financial decline.

Unfortunately if anything is actually written in an aruban history book it will be blaming Nat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 11:28:43 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
well the 1st line discredits the whole thing for me as it was impossible for Joran to have been picked up at 11:00 at McDonalds.


Remember, right at the very first we heard that Paulus told Beth : " I picked THEM up at 4 a.m." And then several days later, after having scrutinized, he changed it to 11 p.m.


And only the SG's saw him?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:29:04 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.

I forgot who is father was.  I thought he worked for the government.  Anna knows who he is.


Dr. Bushi Wever.  He is the Minister of Something or Other like Health and Human Resources might be in this country but I don't know his official title.

He is the one Jossy claims was stiffing the bars in Venezuela, too.  Rather nice looking man for Aruba and has his photo in the newspapers often.

.

I think this is him.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Bushi.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 29, 2006, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


The hall monitor knows, Colombo knows, but SandraK does not know. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 29, 2006, 11:31:12 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Something I picked up going after the Joran, Deepak, Satish
secret recording last night.

-------------------------------


Joran: The security guards guarantee me that they are going to
          kill you when they get out.

Deepak: Oh, yes.



---------------------------------

Is Joran letting us know here that he had communications with
the security guards? In KIA, through Antonio Carlo? :?:

How would Joran be able to communicate with the security
guards?


I think that was answered in my previous post, way back. :wink:   good to see you, Carpe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:32:13 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Yeah, but just wonder is it all baseed on PVDS blackmail threats or does he also have some soprano power as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 11:35:13 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
yes, carnut...

LOL

I was seriously asking the SG question.


I have never heard Joran admit to contact with the SG's in any way.

Perhaps, I was out that day.


-------

I thought your comment from this morning was funny too.

"What do you have against nuts?"  :lol:



Well, wasn't sure I liked your insulting my ethnic heritage.

Of course my response was facetious, think we can all see that JVDS pretty much could do what he wanted, whether it was actual physical contact and conversation or thru intermediarys.


LOL


Absolutely! I hope De Vries continues to bring that stuff out wide open to the public.

Because unfortunately, your average Joe from ( name a country here) they don't know to what extent the ridiculous BS that was occuring behind the scenes & hidden from public view.

...AND IT WAS FRIGGIN R-I-D-I-C-U-L-O-U-S.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:36:19 PM
.
Tyler,
Who is Guido Wever's father?  I thought it was Dr. Buschi Wever who is also one of the Ministers in the current administration and also has some connection to the landfill.

Katgram doesn't think that is the right one.  Do you know who Guido's father is and if he has any power in Aruba??

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 29, 2006, 11:36:56 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Something I picked up going after the Joran, Deepak, Satish
secret recording last night.

-------------------------------


Joran: The security guards guarantee me that they are going to
          kill you when they get out.

Deepak: Oh, yes.



---------------------------------

Is Joran letting us know here that he had communications with
the security guards? In KIA, through Antonio Carlo? :?:

How would Joran be able to communicate with the security
guards?


I think that was answered in my previous post, way back. :wink:   good to see you, Carpe.



gotcha, thanks & same to you tylergal!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:38:39 PM
.
Paulus is a wimp.  He would throw up his socks and get a sick headache at the sight of blood.   Fortunately for him, he has both a son and wife who have no such qualms.

Just in case anybody was wondering. . . .

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:38:47 PM
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:40:41 PM
well, im taking it as fact that PAULUS was in the casino video


nobody ever came forward to say "hey that was me"

another thing people are trying to keep HUSH HUSH
 8)


not for any longer
cause im making it a mission to tell the WORLD :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:41:34 PM
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:42:22 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


was guido the dealer   at the casino ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:43:27 PM
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?

Yes, and one of the charges was heavy battery. As far as we know, he is still a suspect. For what that is worth in Dutch Land.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 11:44:25 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


was guido the dealer   at the casino ?

I'm thinking he may have been the Poker dealer not the Blackjack dealer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:44:49 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?

Yes, and one of the charges was heavy battery. As far as we know, he is still a suspect. For what that is worth in Dutch Land.


ok, so he is in the mix

thats the RIDE HOME for FRANKENSTEIN  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:45:22 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


was guido the dealer   at the casino ?


He was still in high school doing an official internship as a croupier--not sure if that involves actual dealing or just overseeing the rolling of dice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:46:25 PM
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:46:54 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


Well, I'm not afraid of being mauled and I do think there is something wrong with that.

Guess I'm 'outting' myself right here and now.

I do have my prejudices/preferences.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:47:49 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.

On any salary for a working person. Or anyone who isn't a Hilton or a Gates or a Forbes. :lol:  :lol:   Gerard Spong was a lawyer for Milosevic.
But then it was the KJ who issued the warrant for Guido and GVC also.
She seemed to also be looking very hard at others.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 29, 2006, 11:48:14 PM
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


So, is lie #2 that 'Satish picked my up'?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:48:33 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


So, is lie #2 that 'Satish picked my up'?


yepper

good call  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:49:15 PM
1.holiday inn drop off lie

2. satish gave him a ride home


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:52:08 PM
Quote from: "San"
[I think this is him.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Bushi.jpg)



I think that is him, too, at least that is who I have in mind as Guido's father.  Tyler did not respond but very early scubajap said he also was in charge of the landfill so again we have conflict of interest with his preventing it from being searched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:53:14 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
[I think this is him.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Bushi.jpg)



I think that is him, too, at least that is who I have in mind as Guido's father.  Tyler did not respond but very early scubajap said he also was in charge of the landfill so again we have conflict of interest with his preventing it from being searched.



 :shock:

ohhh geeeeesh

i hate them all more each day


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:53:38 PM
Robots, Joran was gambling with Guido the next night, Monday.
PVDS ( isn't it funny how his name keeps popping up ) asked Joran for Guido's phone number as he wanted to check on the $$$$$$$ won, cause he needed to check it out. My source... the PV's.
Guido is / was an very accomplished tennis player and that is where the connection to  Joran is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:55:18 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Robots, Joran was gambling with Guido the next night, Monday.
PVDS ( isn't it funny how his name keeps popping up ) asked Joran for Guido's phone number as he wanted to check on the $$$$$$$ won, cause he needed to check it out. My source... the PV's.
Guido is / was an very accomplished tennis player and that is where the connection to  Joran is.



GUIDO cant get away from this MESS

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

GUIDO knows the story

 :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:57:11 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Robots, Joran was gambling with Guido the next night, Monday.
PVDS ( isn't it funny how his name keeps popping up ) asked Joran for Guido's phone number as he wanted to check on the $$$$$$$ won, cause he needed to check it out. My source... the PV's.
Guido is / was an very accomplished tennis player and that is where the connection to  Joran is.


and the only prrof we have that he is gay ( which may have been a way to disguise the whole situation ) was from the lawyer...

lawyers always tell the truth  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


hmmmmmmmm..............

so, joran is hangin out with guido who is gay ?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 29, 2006, 11:57:35 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Robots, Joran was gambling with Guido the next night, Monday.
PVDS ( isn't it funny how his name keeps popping up ) asked Joran for Guido's phone number as he wanted to check on the $$$$$$$ won, cause he needed to check it out. My source... the PV's.
Guido is / was an very accomplished tennis player and that is where the connection to  Joran is.


Guido was also doing the internship at the Excelsior Casino.  Since he was in school through the week, perhaps he was working there on Sunday when the MB girls and Joran were in the casino.

Have never heard one way or the other if he was.  Tito just said he got out of Dodge immediately without finishing his school year and leaving his new car, etc.

Huuumm, new car, robots.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:58:15 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Robots, Joran was gambling with Guido the next night, Monday.
PVDS ( isn't it funny how his name keeps popping up ) asked Joran for Guido's phone number as he wanted to check on the $$$$$$$ won, cause he needed to check it out. My source... the PV's.
Guido is / was an very accomplished tennis player and that is where the connection to  Joran is.


Guido was also doing the internship at the Excelsior Casino.  Since he was in school through the week, perhaps he was working there on Sunday when the MB girls and Joran were in the casino.

Have never heard one way or the other if he was.  Tito just said he got out of Dodge immediately without finishing his school year and leaving his new car, etc.

Huuumm, new car, robots.

.




hmmmmmmm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:58:38 PM
guido is the LINK

bet the FARM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 29, 2006, 11:58:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Robots, Joran was gambling with Guido the next night, Monday.
PVDS ( isn't it funny how his name keeps popping up ) asked Joran for Guido's phone number as he wanted to check on the $$$$$$$ won, cause he needed to check it out. My source... the PV's.
Guido is / was an very accomplished tennis player and that is where the connection to  Joran is.


Guido was also doing the internship at the Excelsior Casino.  Since he was in school through the week, perhaps he was working there on Sunday when the MB girls and Joran were in the casino.

Have never heard one way or the other if he was.  Tito just said he got out of Dodge immediately without finishing his school year and leaving his new car, etc.

Huuumm, new car, robots.

.

Leaving his new WHITE car  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 29, 2006, 11:59:04 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thank you bleached - I have the book, but didn't remember that he had included the yearbook quote.


You are welcome msmarple anytime....anything to help with the work you do. You do a great job!


bleached & other Monkeys -

I thank you for that, but I have to say that writing and organizing information is something I can do. Getting responses to my letters is another matter.

I haven't gotten any response from the State Dept. or any of the Alabama politicos. (Well, my initial letter to the Consul Gen. in Curacao got a reply; he did tell me where to send my material.) Not even a form reply.

I have a feeling that in terms of the Alabama folks, it might have helped if I had an Alabama address. Maybe some of you from Alabama could help with postal letters and emails? There are several letters in the M&C thread you could use as models. And the addresses I used are there, too - although Congress was in session at the time and I used their Washington addresses.

(See page 6 for those addresses. I especially like the letter on page 7 to the travel agents, because by then we had the FBI U.S. Murder statistics.)  

Also didn't get a response from Gov. Riley.

And I have another question: Does anybody know what really happened with Bachus and his apparent 180-degree turn? I guess I'm wondering if this "official cold shoulder" has the same cause?

I have quite a few other letters out there, but I've decided not to post unless/until I get results.

Anna & I thank all of you who have been so great about posting things on M&C. It's up to 10 pages, and it's grim information indeed. I wouldn't wish a trip to Aruba on my worst enemy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 29, 2006, 11:59:15 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Yeah, but just wonder is it all baseed on PVDS blackmail threats or does he also have some soprano power as well.


If you look at what the Sloots actually do have, then one comes up short in that category.  Living in a modest house in the area he does leaves me wondering what he knows that affords him such freedom on the island.  Had this been anyone else's son they would be in KIA now.  It's what he KNOWS that keeps him in power.  Shango told us...but no one listens...want me to prove it?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 29, 2006, 11:59:40 PM
So, if DeVries thinks it happened at the house, maybe two ppl got a ride to the Sloot Sty. ???
Something bad happened at the Sloot place after J and N were dropped off. Or maybe Guido went in ? Or Freddy ? Who knows. He got home somehow.
In the garden, around the pool. While she's trying to escape. Panic.
Put porn video in. Leave, come back and start the cover up and lies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 29, 2006, 11:59:56 PM
guido guido guido ........im on a new hunt

GUIDO.......

is up to his neck in this


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: vms on November 30, 2006, 12:02:07 AM
Guido's father is Robert Wever...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Guidosfather.jpg)
http://www.solodipueblo.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=487&Itemid=2


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:02:11 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Yeah, but just wonder is it all baseed on PVDS blackmail threats or does he also have some soprano power as well.


If you look at what the Sloots actually do have, then one comes up short in that category.  Living in a modest house in the area he does leaves me wondering what he knows that affords him such freedom on the island.  Had this been anyone else's son they would be in KIA now.  It's what he KNOWS that keeps him in power.  Shango told us...but no one listens...want me to prove it?  :wink:


I'll pass.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:02:24 AM
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


Very good observation...it would be about the right time for Guido to come along after he got off work in the wee hours.  He could easily have seen him or maybe Joran called him to swing by the beach and pick him up.  He didn't necessarily need to tell Guido what had happened, just that he needed a ride.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 12:02:44 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Dropped by to say hi, caught up on the reading, was here earlier. Memphis you look adorable in your Christmas finery, I forgot to tell you earlier. Glad everyone seems to be doing well here tonight.....


Thank you very much bb. Klaas did my hair.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 30, 2006, 12:03:01 AM
There are no pictures of Guido and Joran hanging out like guys.
Friends from tennis. Guido , didn't he give lessons ? Joran is / was a good tennis player, not as good as Guido, who represented Aruba in 2004.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 12:03:14 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


Very good observation...it would be about the right time for Guido to come along after he got off work in the wee hours.  He could easily have seen him or maybe Joran called him to swing by the beach and pick him up.  He didn't necessarily need to tell Guido what had happened, just that he needed a ride.


yep

guido is the one...imo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:03:43 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Yeah, but just wonder is it all baseed on PVDS blackmail threats or does he also have some soprano power as well.


If you look at what the Sloots actually do have, then one comes up short in that category.  Living in a modest house in the area he does leaves me wondering what he knows that affords him such freedom on the island.  Had this been anyone else's son they would be in KIA now.  It's what he KNOWS that keeps him in power.  Shango told us...but no one listens...want me to prove it?  :wink:


Actually from what history of the mob that I've seen, most mob boss's appeared to live in modest acommodations.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:04:18 AM
.
MsMarple,
Thank you for all your effort in this regard.  You are welcome to use my Alabama address but it didn't get any more response for me but then I am not in Bacchus district either.

But I am not really aware that he ever did a 180 degree on anything.  As far as I know, he remains supportive of the family in their quest for information.  Like the rest of us, not sure there is much he can do in a foreign country.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 30, 2006, 12:06:16 AM
Quote from: "vms"
Guido's father is Robert Wever...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Guidosfather.jpg)
http://www.solodipueblo.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=487&Itemid=2

TY, not that it matters, but it is real easy to get mixed up when everyone has the same two last names. Croes  + Wever.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 12:06:49 AM
VMS - thanks for posting that article about Guido and his father.  I was looking for it but you are quicker than me, lol  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:06:51 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Yeah, but just wonder is it all baseed on PVDS blackmail threats or does he also have some soprano power as well.


If you look at what the Sloots actually do have, then one comes up short in that category.  Living in a modest house in the area he does leaves me wondering what he knows that affords him such freedom on the island.  Had this been anyone else's son they would be in KIA now.  It's what he KNOWS that keeps him in power.  Shango told us...but no one listens...want me to prove it?  :wink:


Actually from what history of the mob that I've seen, most mob boss's appeared to live in modest acommodations.


When the KIA warden had to appologize to PVDS on the air, it sure appeared to more than a possible blackmail that made him do so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 12:07:13 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "vms"
Guido's father is Robert Wever...

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a398/vms58/Guidosfather.jpg)
http://www.solodipueblo.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=487&Itemid=2

TY, not that it matters, but it is real easy to get mixed up when everyone has the same two last names. Croes  + Wever.


thats why im so lost with all the misc. characters

another reason to hate them all  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:07:18 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Whoever blocked that search should be charged with obstruction of justice and prosecuted. Witt and Ben King seem two culpable at least.
I think there was a disagreement about the wording of the search warrant
at the Sloot Sty. KJ did the search warant ? Did she just cave ? Or giggle and blush ?


At least once she chirped "Paulus wouldn't let us!" at which point she should have had ALE forcibly remove him from the premises and continue with the search.

Since she failed to do so, she, too, should be presecuted for obstruction of justice for she did have a number of members of ALE present and at her disposal.  Additional charges for her would be her failure/refusal to collect forensics from the three suspects in a timely manner.

This could have been done in ADDITION to wiretaps.  One does not automatically eliminate the use of the other.  So when they say they decided to use wiretaps INSTEAD it is nothing short of pure unadultrated BS.  And if they had to chose one, forensics would be by far and away the proper choice since the courts in Aruba apparently do not take anything less.

.


Yep, I would like to see KJ in an orange jumpsuit, shackled to Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:09:10 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Actually, I have to wonder if being released as suspects might not be a good thing. There is no one left to watch over the Kalpoes, therefore just about ANYTHING could happen to them then.  You know unexplained car accidents, accidentally falling from a balconey, getting eaten by a shark while snorkling,  bad food resulting in food poisoning and the list goes on.  If I were them I would be making plans to leave One Crappy Island while they can...they know too much to continue to exist there.


That Dengue fever is bad but I think Arubicide would be more fatal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:10:04 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
BT
Hi there little doggie!  I am not sure I want to explain it at this time...not because I don't understand what he means, but because the answer tends to open a can of worms each time it is discussed.  Let me think about it. I just don't want to travel this road again with the same result.


How about starting a thread about it?

What's wrong with Mrs.' folks?



We already have one...only thing is only the Shangoheads read it.  :roll:


And the problem with that is?

You all trying to convert the unwashed masses to your theory or something?


Carnut, you trying to say the non-shango-heads don't bathe? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:10:11 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Whoever blocked that search should be charged with obstruction of justice and prosecuted. Witt and Ben King seem two culpable at least.
I think there was a disagreement about the wording of the search warrant
at the Sloot Sty. KJ did the search warant ? Did she just cave ? Or giggle and blush ?


At least once she chirped "Paulus wouldn't let us!" at which point she should have had ALE forcibly remove him from the premises and continue with the search.

Since she failed to do so, she, too, should be presecuted for obstruction of justice for she did have a number of members of ALE present and at her disposal.  Additional charges for her would be her failure/refusal to collect forensics from the three suspects in a timely manner.

This could have been done in ADDITION to wiretaps.  One does not automatically eliminate the use of the other.  So when they say they decided to use wiretaps INSTEAD it is nothing short of pure unadultrated BS.  And if they had to chose one, forensics would be by far and away the proper choice since the courts in Aruba apparently do not take anything less.

.


Yep, I would like to see KJ in an orange jumpsuit, shackled to Paulus.


Why? Is that their standard method of foreplay?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:10:54 AM
Carnut
Too late. BRB.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:11:41 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
devries has more


bet the farm on it
 8)

This is what I think too.


It does not get much richer than Guido's family.  Read up on them and then remember who they were able to hire as an attorney and what he was able to buy with that money. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:13:28 AM
Quote from: vms
Guido's father is Robert Wever...

VMS,
Do you know if Robert Wever has any connection to the landfill?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:13:57 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carnut
Too late. BRB.  :lol:


What? Off looking for a pencil?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: vms on November 30, 2006, 12:14:12 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
VMS - thanks for posting that article about Guido and his father.  I was looking for it but you are quicker than me, lol  :wink:


YW, probably the only time that will happen, lol

FWIW, Robert F. Wever was the head of the Alianza Political Party and was listed as owner of  R & G Corporate Consultancy Inc. N.V.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 12:14:43 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
MsMarple,
Thank you for all your effort in this regard.  You are welcome to use my Alabama address but it didn't get any more response for me but then I am not in Bacchus district either.

But I am not really aware that he ever did a 180 degree on anything.  As far as I know, he remains supportive of the family in their quest for information.  Like the rest of us, not sure there is much he can do in a foreign country.

.


Well, sheesh - I've read more than once that when the Aruba folks came here and visited with Bachus, he was all happy face about how the investigation had been handled, etc. (And Deetch [? the Dirty Cop guy] seem really down on him for that reason ... )

Really hard sometimes to keep up with who's on first, second, third ...  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 12:16:41 AM
Interresting that Deepak has Miami, Florida as his location on his myspace site now?  Actually, I wonder if he even set up this site?

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=131637359


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: vms on November 30, 2006, 12:17:40 AM
Quote from: Anna
Quote from: "vms"
Guido's father is Robert Wever...

VMS,
Do you know if Robert Wever has any connection to the landfill?

.


Wasn't that Booshi Wever?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:17:52 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Tyler,
Who is Guido Wever's father?  I thought it was Dr. Buschi Wever who is also one of the Ministers in the current administration and also has some connection to the landfill.

Katgram doesn't think that is the right one.  Do you know who Guido's father is and if he has any power in Aruba??

.


I think it is Bushi, who is internationally, financially very-well connected, even in florida, and beyond.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 12:17:57 AM
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "klaasend"
VMS - thanks for posting that article about Guido and his father.  I was looking for it but you are quicker than me, lol  :wink:


YW, probably the only time that will happen, lol

FWIW, Robert F. Wever was the head of the Alianza Political Party and was listed as owner of  R & G Corporate Consultancy Inc. N.V.


Guido appears to look alot like his father.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:19:21 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


Yes, the attorney is gay but I do not think that Guido (a/k/a Lorenzo is gay).  Anna, do you remember when he posted (the lawyer) at RWV a few times?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:20:06 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Tyler,
Who is Guido Wever's father?  I thought it was Dr. Buschi Wever who is also one of the Ministers in the current administration and also has some connection to the landfill.

Katgram doesn't think that is the right one.  Do you know who Guido's father is and if he has any power in Aruba??

.


I think it is Bushi, who is internationally, financially very-well connected, even in florida, and beyond.



I thought so too but evidently it is this Robert Wever??

Guido looks more like Buschi to me, lol.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:20:41 AM
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


Guido immediately sold his car and headed out to the NL toute suite.  Hmmm, now what color was his car and why did he "trade it," not sell it? and then head to Deutchland?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 12:21:01 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question.  What could Carlo possibly be talking to the SG about?  Was he delivering a message to them??   :shock:


Yeah, S.T.F.U. or else.


Naw, if Carlo actually did talk to the SG's, I'll bet it was to help confirm his own suspicions that JVDS was really the perp by assuring himself that the SG's weren't really involved.


Your first reply was the bingo. This one is the gong.


Was that after the interview?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:22:18 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
[I think this is him.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Bushi.jpg)



I think that is him, too, at least that is who I have in mind as Guido's father.  Tyler did not respond but very early scubajap said he also was in charge of the landfill so again we have conflict of interest with his preventing it from being searched.


Yes, Anna, I think this is he and I think he has some title at the hospital.  These people assign themselves jobs where they get a miniscule salary, but it provides them with a base of operation and a complete set of files on everyone so that they can blackmail them if need be.  Yes, to landfill also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:24:06 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thank you bleached - I have the book, but didn't remember that he had included the yearbook quote.


You are welcome msmarple anytime....anything to help with the work you do. You do a great job!


bleached & other Monkeys -

I thank you for that, but I have to say that writing and organizing information is something I can do. Getting responses to my letters is another matter.

I haven't gotten any response from the State Dept. or any of the Alabama politicos. (Well, my initial letter to the Consul Gen. in Curacao got a reply; he did tell me where to send my material.) Not even a form reply.

I have a feeling that in terms of the Alabama folks, it might have helped if I had an Alabama address. Maybe some of you from Alabama could help with postal letters and emails? There are several letters in the M&C thread you could use as models. And the addresses I used are there, too - although Congress was in session at the time and I used their Washington addresses.

(See page 6 for those addresses. I especially like the letter on page 7 to the travel agents, because by then we had the FBI U.S. Murder statistics.)  

Also didn't get a response from Gov. Riley.

And I have another question: Does anybody know what really happened with Bachus and his apparent 180-degree turn? I guess I'm wondering if this "official cold shoulder" has the same cause?

I have quite a few other letters out there, but I've decided not to post unless/until I get results.

Anna & I thank all of you who have been so great about posting things on M&C. It's up to 10 pages, and it's grim information indeed. I wouldn't wish a trip to Aruba on my worst enemy.


Well, short of sending it to Medley Relay and having it come from Arkansas, you can send it to me and I will mail it.  I do know the governor through old family connections.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:24:17 AM
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:22 pm
Because the fallen judge agreed, he can sing any song he wants
A poisonous siren in the halls of babylon
He will sing to keep doors open, much to the cowboys distress

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:30 pm
Who knows what song the elder will sing


PVDS said he would tell the entire world about all the secrets.  The money laundering, the porn, the parties, the drug connections, who's sleeping with whom, who paid off whomever to get things done.  

PVDS knows where ALL the bodies are buried, not just Natalee's  and who has skeletons in their closets.  He's been privy to some mighty big information to be able to do what he has done to Aruba.  There is no other explanation.

See, told you I could prove it with Shango.. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 30, 2006, 12:25:54 AM
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "klaasend"
VMS - thanks for posting that article about Guido and his father.  I was looking for it but you are quicker than me, lol  :wink:


YW, probably the only time that will happen, lol

FWIW, Robert F. Wever was the head of the Alianza Political Party and was listed as owner of  R & G Corporate Consultancy Inc. N.V.

The article said from Sta. Cruz . Do you remember a rumor about a phone call from the Sloot residence to Santa Cruz at around 6 am ?
We ( me ) were guessing Steve CROES.
But, the ever hasty on the job ALE didn't go to the Wever place until May
2006 to take some things away.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:25:56 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


Very good observation...it would be about the right time for Guido to come along after he got off work in the wee hours.  He could easily have seen him or maybe Joran called him to swing by the beach and pick him up.  He didn't necessarily need to tell Guido what had happened, just that he needed a ride.


Maybe that was the reason for the meeting with Guido the following day, before Beth arrived. :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:27:38 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
MsMarple,
Thank you for all your effort in this regard.  You are welcome to use my Alabama address but it didn't get any more response for me but then I am not in Bacchus district either.

But I am not really aware that he ever did a 180 degree on anything.  As far as I know, he remains supportive of the family in their quest for information.  Like the rest of us, not sure there is much he can do in a foreign country.

.


You are exactly, right, Anna, but all he can do right now is sit back and collect data and wait.  He is well apprised of what is going on.  He did not do a 180. The man did his job.  He cannot meet with Arleen and slap her, like we would like him to do.  He is a politician, a very diplomatic person, at that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 30, 2006, 12:28:17 AM
And I just wanted to mention Joe T who read every piece of paper in the prosecutors office. Does he now know Dutch ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:28:27 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carnut
Too late. BRB.  :lol:


What? Off looking for a pencil?



Oh shut up!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:28:27 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Who has the power in Aruba?  It would be the Sloots...they are the ones that are guilty, yet the ENTIRE island has catered to their every wish.  If the power did not lie at their feet, then Joran would be toast.   PVDS knows all the secrets of everyone else on Aruba and he's kept meticulous notes and those in authority fear what he knows and how it can be used.


Yeah, but just wonder is it all baseed on PVDS blackmail threats or does he also have some soprano power as well.


If you look at what the Sloots actually do have, then one comes up short in that category.  Living in a modest house in the area he does leaves me wondering what he knows that affords him such freedom on the island.  Had this been anyone else's son they would be in KIA now.  It's what he KNOWS that keeps him in power.  Shango told us...but no one listens...want me to prove it?  :wink:


Actually from what history of the mob that I've seen, most mob boss's appeared to live in modest acommodations.


When the KIA warden had to appologize to PVDS on the air, it sure appeared to more than a possible blackmail that made him do so.


Yeah, they had Deepak's gun holding it on poor old Fred.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:28:39 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
MsMarple,
Thank you for all your effort in this regard.  You are welcome to use my Alabama address but it didn't get any more response for me but then I am not in Bacchus district either.

But I am not really aware that he ever did a 180 degree on anything.  As far as I know, he remains supportive of the family in their quest for information.  Like the rest of us, not sure there is much he can do in a foreign country.

.


Well, sheesh - I've read more than once that when the Aruba folks came here and visited with Bacchus, he was all happy face about how the investigation had been handled, etc. (And Deetch [? the Dirty Cop guy] seem really down on him for that reason ... )

Really hard sometimes to keep up with who's on first, second, third ...  :?



Well, he's a politician.  In order for someone to do a 180, I would assume their position would have to change in some manner.  As far as I know, Bacchus has always said he supports the family and will do everything he can, blah, blah, blah.  He just doesn't do anything like everybody else involved in this.  They told him they spent one fourth of their annual budget on this case and had over 12,000 pages, etc.

The only thing I heard from his meeting was Greta asking him if the Arubans were unhappy with anything and he said yes and she asked what was it and he said one word "wiretaps" which has set off a whole chain of events and speculation as to what he meant.

Yes, I am sure many of us wish he and done more but he has never expressed a lack of support for the family in any way that I am aware of.

I guess it's how one views the situation but I am not sure if there is anything he can do.  I guess he could call or write to Aruba but they would probably just send somebody else like Arlene from the tourist department or have them return his call.  Like the rest of us, I am sure he finds this frustrating.

Lalas and I have called his office and they are very cordial about it but just said something like he is monitoring the situation very carefully or some political doubletalk.



.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:30:43 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:22 pm
Because the fallen judge agreed, he can sing any song he wants
A poisonous siren in the halls of babylon
He will sing to keep doors open, much to the cowboys distress

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:30 pm
Who knows what song the elder will sing


PVDS said he would tell the entire world about all the secrets.  The money laundering, the porn, the parties, the drug connections, who's sleeping with whom, who paid off whomever to get things done.  

PVDS knows where ALL the bodies are buried, not just Natalee's  and who has skeletons in their closets.  He's been privy to some mighty big information to be able to do what he has done to Aruba.  There is no other explanation.

See, told you I could prove it with Shango.. :wink:


WOW!!!!! What a coincidence!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:31:21 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
ok, im going with JORAN got the ride home with GUIDO

wanted everone to think K2 gave him one because he did not want to implicate GUIDO


Very good observation...it would be about the right time for Guido to come along after he got off work in the wee hours.  He could easily have seen him or maybe Joran called him to swing by the beach and pick him up.  He didn't necessarily need to tell Guido what had happened, just that he needed a ride.


Maybe that was the reason for the meeting with Guido the following day, before Beth arrived. :wink:  :wink:


I am sure you have noticed that PVDS has had in some way a meeting with all the parties of interest that could possibly take down the sporter.  I


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:31:57 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carnut
Too late. BRB.  :lol:


What? Off looking for a pencil?



Oh shut up!  :wink:


I do like your Xmas avatar.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:32:55 AM
I think I will check in with Bacchus again tomorrow.  After all what could it hurt?  We need to put a little more pressure on things at this time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:34:05 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I think I will check in with Bacchus again tomorrow.  After all what could it hurt?  We need to put a little more pressure on things at this time.


Would be nice if he could be made aware of the DeVries report.

And the shopped images.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:35:18 AM
Carnut
I am rather cute, aren't I?  Oh geez, you made me blush.  Stop that!  I know what you are up to.  You're afraid I won't give you the "naughty" half of my list.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:35:54 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


Yes, the attorney is gay but I do not think that Guido (a/k/a Lorenzo is gay).  Anna, do you remember when he posted (the lawyer) at RWV a few times?



Did he post under a nicname?  I do remember a lawyer from the Netherlands but thought he and Dan got into it and Dan banned him pretty quickly.  

Then later thought it might be that one on FOB, JR.  But it never did quite fit together and guess that is why, it was this one instead?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 12:36:19 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I think I will check in with Bacchus again tomorrow.  After all what could it hurt?  We need to put a little more pressure on things at this time.


Would be nice if he could be made aware of the DeVries report.

And the shopped images.


I will send them to him and then call and tell them to check their email.  That would work.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:37:13 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carnut
I am rather cute, aren't I?  Oh geez, you made me blush.  Stop that!  I know what you are up to.  You're afraid I won't give you the "naughty" half of my list.  :wink:


Like all women, questioning my motives, sheeessse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:38:37 AM
.
Tyler,
The lawyer I remember was very hostile and seemed to be so generally to Americans.  Is that the one?

Do you remember Robert who wrote those long, essay like posts with perfect grammar and punctuation?  I used to think he was Robert Werner the headmaster but don't think so and am not sure who he was any more.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 12:42:45 AM
Anna, Tyler - Okay, I'll go with your take on Bachus. Just thought there might be something I was clueless about, that was maybe the reason I wasn't getting so much as a form letter from gov't. people.

Onward, re. mailing from Alabama -

Were you thinking I could send them to you via email, and then y'all print & mail them? Or what?

Because even if I use your mailing addresses (which I don't know!) and do it myself, the postmark will be 'Atlanta'.

I was thinking more along the lines of Ala. folks just using one of the existing letters, modify as you like, sign your own names, and put in the mail.

I don't think this is a situation for misrepresenting who or where I am.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:43:31 AM
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:48:33 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


Do you know how long it takes to download a movie?

Depending on connection speeds I think would have taken a lot longer than 2hrs.

Maybe if they were just short videos, one just dosen't know. Don't think we've had any real clarification of the details.

Anyhow the whole porn movie thing is just another red herring.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:49:13 AM
No, MsMarple,
we would need to send our own copies, etc. from here and have done so in the past but not recently.  Not being in his district, it may not matter to Bacchus if I am from Alabama or not as I do not vote for him.

Usually have better response from Senators anyway.  They must lave alrger staff.  I will try to send both them something in the next few days and see if there is any response.

Someone from Bacchus district might have better luck but then Lalas is closer and she is going to email and call.  Hope she has results.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 12:51:04 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
No, MsMarple,
we would need to send our own copies, etc. from here and have done so in the past but not recently.  Not being in his district, it may not matter to Bacchus if I am from Alabama or not as I do not vote for him.

Usually have better response from Senators anyway.  They must lave alrger staff.  I will try to send both them something in the next few days and see if there is any response.

Someone from Bacchus district might have better luck but then Lalas is closer and she is going to email and call.  Hope she has results.

.


Heh,  heh, from what I've seen about the actions of our congress critters, I think 'staff' are running our country.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 12:51:21 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I think I will check in with Bacchus again tomorrow.  After all what could it hurt?  We need to put a little more pressure on things at this time.


Would be nice if he could be made aware of the DeVries report.

And the shopped images.


I will send them to him and then call and tell them to check their email.  That would work.  :)


You go, girl!  Good luck.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:52:11 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


Do you know how long it takes to download a movie?

Depending on connection speeds I think would have taken a lot longer than 2hrs.

Maybe if they were just short videos, one just dosen't know. Don't think we've had any real clarification of the details.

Anyhow the whole porn movie thing is just another red herring.


I thought we did know and they were one hour long movies each.  Watching for two hours I thought was what was said.  The point I am trying to make is whether or not he was able to download them and then just set to running and leave and go do something else entirely.  Or did he have to be back present at the computer to start the second.

A download of about an hour would take approx ten minutes tops on my computer.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:54:29 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


Do you know how long it takes to download a movie?

Depending on connection speeds I think would have taken a lot longer than 2hrs.

Maybe if they were just short videos, one just dosen't know. Don't think we've had any real clarification of the details.

Anyhow the whole porn movie thing is just another red herring.




Are you saying it takes longer to download a movie than to watch it?  Not on my computer.  You better make some adjustments.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:55:36 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido was arrested ???
and was the guy that his lawyer told the world he was gay ???


yes ?


Yes, one of the most expensive lawyers in all of Europe, too.  Wouldn't think they could afford that on bank employee salaries but you never know in Aruba.  Some jobs appear to pay far more than usual.   :wink:

And the lawyer is also gay as well.  Not that there is anything wrong with that before I get mauled.

.


Yes, the attorney is gay but I do not think that Guido (a/k/a Lorenzo is gay).  Anna, do you remember when he posted (the lawyer) at RWV a few times?



Did he post under a nicname?  I do remember a lawyer from the Netherlands but thought he and Dan got into it and Dan banned him pretty quickly.  

Then later thought it might be that one on FOB, JR.  But it never did quite fit together and guess that is why, it was this one instead?

.


I think I have one of his posts still.  I will look for it.  He was very arrogant and bragged about how much money (to MsJH) that he had made off the Milosovic and Van Gogh cases.  I will e-mail you the info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:55:40 AM
Goodnight, all!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:57:20 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Tyler,
The lawyer I remember was very hostile and seemed to be so generally to Americans.  Is that the one?

Do you remember Robert who wrote those long, essay like posts with perfect grammar and punctuation?  I used to think he was Robert Werner the headmaster but don't think so and am not sure who he was any more.

.


I do remember Robert, but had no idea who he was.  I thought he was very closely connected to the Sloots (Robert) but never could quite figure him out.  Oh, Lord, yes, he posted long essays and they were quite eloquent but he, too, was a jerk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:58:50 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Anna, Tyler - Okay, I'll go with your take on Bachus. Just thought there might be something I was clueless about, that was maybe the reason I wasn't getting so much as a form letter from gov't. people.

Onward, re. mailing from Alabama -

Were you thinking I could send them to you via email, and then y'all print & mail them? Or what?

Because even if I use your mailing addresses (which I don't know!) and do it myself, the postmark will be 'Atlanta'.

I was thinking more along the lines of Ala. folks just using one of the existing letters, modify as you like, sign your own names, and put in the mail.

I don't think this is a situation for misrepresenting who or where I am.


Just e-mail me (you have my addy) and I will mail it with mine.  It does not matter.  We can sign together, using my address; that does not mean you live here, just that you are the author and I am co-signing with you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 12:59:30 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


He downloaded but did not watch them.  He was elsewhere doing something else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 01:00:51 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
No, MsMarple,
we would need to send our own copies, etc. from here and have done so in the past but not recently.  Not being in his district, it may not matter to Bacchus if I am from Alabama or not as I do not vote for him.

Usually have better response from Senators anyway.  They must lave alrger staff.  I will try to send both them something in the next few days and see if there is any response.

Someone from Bacchus district might have better luck but then Lalas is closer and she is going to email and call.  Hope she has results.

.


Heh,  heh, from what I've seen about the actions of our congress critters, I think 'staff' are running our country.


Yes, and it is maddening.  LOL.  Some neighbors of my son were arrested in conjunction with the former governor and Scruschy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 01:01:49 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


Do you know how long it takes to download a movie?

Depending on connection speeds I think would have taken a lot longer than 2hrs.

Maybe if they were just short videos, one just dosen't know. Don't think we've had any real clarification of the details.

Anyhow the whole porn movie thing is just another red herring.




Are you saying it takes longer to download a movie than to watch it?  Not on my computer.  You better make some adjustments.   :roll:
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 30, 2006, 01:02:13 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
I wonder if Joran downloaded both the porn movies then watched or ran them or did he download one and watch or let it run then download the other?

What I mean was did he leave them just running for a very long period of time like over two hours without any input from him on his computer.

.


Do you know how long it takes to download a movie?

Depending on connection speeds I think would have taken a lot longer than 2hrs.

Maybe if they were just short videos, one just dosen't know. Don't think we've had any real clarification of the details.

Anyhow the whole porn movie thing is just another red herring.


Are you saying it takes longer to download a movie than to watch it?  Not on my computer.  You better make some adjustments.   :roll:


Yep, does look like we must watch different kinda of movies or something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 01:03:03 AM
Night Anna.  I too am going to turn in.

Please remember Mrs. Red's father that is ill and please send a prayer up for Nemo's mom. She's had some stress in her life lately and she could use a few monkey hugs and some prayers as well. Us monkeys have to stick to gether. Hugging Nemo. Winkies for None. :wink:  :wink:  :wink:

Somebody get the lights...


Title: blending
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 01:11:05 AM
Anna,

I am at the page where you questioned the whys and ifs having to to do with the 2nd photo shopped/cropped pict that Joran has placed himself into.

I am not a Photoshop expert and perhaps Klaas has already ansered this,

but.... to make Joran look as if he has his arm around her and she is close to his face, the hair had to be narrowed, probably leaving out the left earring so she'd fit close to him. In doing this, it is my guess the photo shopper/cropper need to match her hair color to match in the fill in place he was doing. He/she probably grabbed a darker blend of a color in Natalee's hair and didn't streak  it as he should have at the cost he/she was paid.

IMO my 2 cents worth and I haven't done Photoshop in years!

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 01:22:32 AM
Earlier tonight Robots was making a "lie list." I can't take the time now to run down the PVs or transcripts to support this, but I *think* it goes like this - would like any further clarification from anyone:

1. HI dropoff & SG story. HI tape does not support dropoff, and SGs have alibis.

2. K2 & Natalee dropped J off at VDS house. K2 deny (2 against 1).

3. K2 dropped Natalee & J off at beach near Marriott; DK picked up Joran later; Natalee left on the beach. I believe this also incorporates DK promising to swing by and get J's shoes (which would put DK in Natalee's vicinity on the beach). The IM to DK ("I'm home") blows this one.

4. K2 dropped Natalee & J off at beach near Marriott; SK picked up Joran later; Natalee left on the beach. I think this was said on a show; I did not see that in a PV. Do not know specifically why this was discounted, although "2 against 1" probably a factor.

5. K2 dropped Natalee & J off at beach near Marriott; Joran walked home barefoot and left Natalee on the beach. Per de Vries, ALE do not believe the beach was involved.

6. Meanwhile, there is the strange conflicting account of what was said in the VDS driveway when the so-called Alabama Posse arrived. Per Beth, "10 witnesses" heard PVDS say he picked J up at McDonald's at 4:00 a.m.

And that's just the transportation lies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 01:27:52 AM
Should have noted in No. 6 above, re. the PVDS "pickup at 4:00 a.m." - PVDS subsequently denies this, sticks to the pickup at 11:00 p.m. only.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 01:38:04 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Should have noted in No. 6 above, re. the PVDS "pickup at 4:00 a.m." - PVDS subsequently denies this, sticks to the pickup at 11:00 p.m. only.


The pickup at 4 a.m. was witnessed.  It contains the get-out-of-jail-free card.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 02:05:33 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Should have noted in No. 6 above, re. the PVDS "pickup at 4:00 a.m." - PVDS subsequently denies this, sticks to the pickup at 11:00 p.m. only.


The pickup at 4 a.m. was witnessed.  It contains the get-out-of-jail-free card.


Explain? I think I remember something about a witness or maybe security camera on this ... but get-out-of-jail-free?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 02:15:00 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Should have noted in No. 6 above, re. the PVDS "pickup at 4:00 a.m." - PVDS subsequently denies this, sticks to the pickup at 11:00 p.m. only.


The pickup at 4 a.m. was witnessed.  It contains the get-out-of-jail-free card.


I've been thinking about this 4:00 a.m. pickup these last few days. Of course, just because PVDS said this in the driveway that morning, doesn't mean it's a fact - BUT, let's say it is true and he picked Joran up at 4:00 a.m. at McDonald's again, I think it was?

How does this tie in with this latest from de Vries, that ALE doesn't buy the beach story at all?

And that the VDS homestead was involved?

And that JVDS ran porn on the computer for two hours?

Too tired to think about it now ...  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Sue on November 30, 2006, 02:25:36 AM

Maybe Joron was downlaoding porn to get natalee ya know in the mood
because that is the way his sick mind works


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 03:05:41 AM
Questions frequently arise regards Mike Posner and the Holiday Inn.  I found this that I had saved from Harry Tho before he got Slooted.

HarryTho On The Natalee Holloway Case: Was Michael Posner in the mob?
Topics: Natalee Holloway

A reader at another site asked if the Mike Posner of Aruba is the same Mike Posner from the Chicago Mob. The answer is yes. He did some time in the 80s, but after his release the Chicago outfit rewarded him by putting him in charge of their Aruba interests. In Chicago he was identified in the newspapers as “The Vice Kingpin of the Northwest Suburbs.” He ran gambling, adult bookstores, strip clubs and prostitution. You'll recall that Posner and Natalee went missing during the same week, which is too much of a coincidence to simply ignore. According to the early posts on Dan Reihl's site, Posner met Natalee at the Excelsior Casino. I believe it was at the same time that Natalee introduced herself to Joran van der Sloot.

Posner certainly had the ability to make Natalee disappear. From the comments on the excelsior Casino that they cater to a lot of wealthy South Americans, I would suspect that Posner would be our connection to the sex trade. He is the King of the Bums in Aruba. He knows what is going on criminal-wise. The fact that Natalee has not appeared, tells me that he had something to do with her disappearance.

I have suspected Posner's involvement all along, but I had never previously suspected that he had a criminal record from Chicago, at least until the information came out. How the Aruba police have not clamped down on this guy is simply amazing. But, Posner could have had an arrangement with the former Police Chief van der Straaten.

As reported: Michael Posner owns the Excelsior Casino in Aruba, and caters mostly to "Spaniards". From what I gather from the Excelsior's casino info, some 30% of the gamblers come from South America. These are experienced gamblers used to playing for high stakes. Hence, they are South Americans with money!

On another note, the Excelsior Casino is a pioneer in on-line gambling.

Also, Michal Posner bought the Grand Holiday Casino (GHC) and changed the name to the Excelsior Casino on 1 September 1998.

Posted for HarryTho


Title: Avatar
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 03:11:53 AM
Klaas,

Hi! I am still pages behind in reading, put have another favor. When my HD went down, I thought I had a lot backed up. Can;t find my avatar?

Do you, by chance still have it? Thought I'd ask late early in AM and maybe you aren't too busy. TIA    IBE (It's freezing now, yet in short sleeves this afternoon!)


Title: The finger
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 03:17:45 AM
In the picture where Joran is first photoshopped/cropped in... it looks, IMO, as if Natalee is giving him the finger!   Go Natalle and one to all who are into corruptness, cronyism, coverup and elitism everywhere!

What is way she might be using to get her message out!


Title: Opps should have read
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 03:19:14 AM
Opps, should have read "What a way".


Title: Robots
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 03:28:07 AM
Re: your question... perhaps the family up to grandpa of Wever? et al


Title: Thoughts
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 04:27:00 AM
Must be the only one here! this AM.

Look at the Wever family public press release response to their son's arrest.... more Hitler refs. et al.; why bring Hitler into a PR release about your son's arrest? Just like the Arubian request to our State Department or was it the FBI... was Beth really related to Hitler??? OH Come on! Ugh. Out of the same cloth er writing?

Study the style of writing; maybe is similar to many of the previous Arubian PR releases, along the line with Natalee "just disappeared"  and anti-Beth statements coming out of Aruba... IMO.

Go farther up the ladder... isn't there a grandfather in the 70's who and his son (Guildo's father) who are in the business of matching businesses up with money in Aruba?

Also I read somewhere that the elder elder on is still active behind the scenes on the political front and diplomacy front in Aruba and pulls many strings. I think this was posted early on by an Arubian poster.

It might be interesting to see if there is a maze in here somewhere that continues back to Holland's mover and shakers that like Aruba, perhaps, the way it is and profit greatly from it. IMO just thoughts.

RE PVDS....Of course, PVDS would know the skeletons, as many, on this close knit island, especially if you were Dutch, and in the Court system. I believe that PVDS even helped Volking (King) on the Court cases, evidence of the Mathews case.

There is some ref. in that case of missing evidence in Aruba and trying to coverup what really happened... I think the International Court at The Hague got into it, finally, and blew it apart.

Why were the Black men arrested, even, when supposedly via the ALA's wiretaps (aka singing birds?) and other knowledge (IMO) known to KJ and the Judges (with a capital "J") said that the Black men were not part of the "disappearance".

Isn't Interpol the agency that steps in when there is supposed areas of corruptness in law enforcement and prosecution?

Wasn't the Ober and Wever cemetary spots damaged? How does this figure into the timeline of happenings on the Island?

Shango was right in many of his/her coded messages.... even down to the porn. Many of the Code Talkers Thread caught that early on and stayed withh it.

Alas, what was ever done to the school students who raped their fellow student in Aruba and plasted the act all over with cell phones or was it the computer?

The poor girl had to leave her home, her parents and start schooling in another country.

What did KJ and the ALE do since then to the "boys". After the terrible thing that happened to Natalee  and all the bad PR for Aruba.. what lead the "boys" to think they could do it and get by with it?? Well, nothing happened to those with Natalee the last night!!! so I guess that might be their thinking! What a web has been weaved and those decieved!

I hope all those wearing White Hats take care of themselves.


Title: Tylergirl
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 04:38:48 AM
Tylergirl,

Remember the cartoon from Canada, I believe, that had the hooded ones on the beach? which we now know was the Visability Team. The artist had someone's face in the hotel, on a high floor over-seeing it all.

Could that have been a hint... aka Shango-ism... maybe not really seeing "it" happen but over-seeing it after it happened? Maybe it wasn't even Posner... the Visibility Team business had a lot to loose if their members and/or were involved

The cartoon also hinted at that Natalee was pegged before that night..

IMO Makes us go hmmmmmmmm

Night all.


Title: High speed computer downloads
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 04:55:45 AM
Since I am the only one here... I'll add one more thing.

I have a 56k modem. If I download the City Council's meeting and it is an hour.. it takes me that long to download it or Dana's program in mpeg form. (ipod for for those who have ipods)

Would think if Joran had such a very expensive lap top shown in his pool side picture, I would think they would have cable or sat. downlink ie DSL.

Would the Wi-Fi network at the hotels be able to be picked up at Joran's house? If they had the outdoor connection (whatever it is called. Help! Metroguy, where are you??) anyway if this antennae (sp?) was on top of the hotel wouldn't it cover more than a few blocks? His house wasn't that far away for WIFI?

We have WiFi downtown in the city in which I live. It is on a 2 story building and only carries about 2 blocks and not in all directions because of its placement, I guess. I can pick it up at certain places, but not all outside in the same area.

Some of the connects don't work because of, I guess, the structure of the buildings downtown.. however, there would be no high buildings, etc between the hotels and where Joran lives.

There were many refs. in Shango about singing birds, and some ref. about the areas in the SE or SW of the island... a mountain or a hump or

It's late... it had Hool or something like that in the name. Is the city, and hotel areas WI FIed?

Don't forget about what Anna has always said about the computer and phone times... something stinks... but most does anyway about this case.

This time, it is Good Night. Monkeys  Keep keeping up the Good Works!

Help Klaas or someone... anyone have my little monkey imp avatar??? I miss him or her!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: IBE on November 30, 2006, 05:00:32 AM
Quote
Sue

Maybe Joron was downlaoding porn to get natalee ya know in the mood because that is the way his sick mind works


Wasn't it Satish that put in the DVD of the porn in the call right after Natalee got in?

Seems the pimps MO!  lots of porn and taking advantage of tourist girls.

Did they learn it from the "elders"? as a way of life on that Happy Island?


Title: 52 degrees and no snow!
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 05:58:51 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 06:01:28 AM
From Diario:

ABOGADONAN DI JORAN, DEEPAK Y SATISH TA BAY CORTE AWE, PA PIDI MINISTERIO TUMA UN DECISION

ORANJESTAD(AAN): Awe na corte e sospechosonan Deepak y Satish Kalpoe ta bay presenta dilanti di huez comisario hunto cu nan abogado David Kock.
Abogado Carlo representando Joran van der Sloot tambe lo bay corte, pero ainda no ta sigur cu Joran mes tambe lo tey.
E sospechosonan lo bay corte acompaña pa nan abogadonan, pa pidi huez pa laga Ministerio Publico tuma e decision di sea cuminza un caso contra nan of sepone esaki.
Despues di casi exactamente 1 aña y mey cu Natalee Holloway a desaparece, ainda Ministerio Publico no a cuminza un caso contra e 3 sospechosonan y ainda ta consideranan como sospechoso.
Esaki ta pone cu Joran, Satish y Deepak ta keda den un incertidumbre, mientras cu Ministerio Publico por keda exigi cierto cosnan for di nan. Pesey e abogadonan kier pa huez tuma un decision, pa e hobennan por sigui cu nan bida.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 30, 2006, 06:18:52 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "GabbyG"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Imette St Guillen Case

NYPD blowtorched the plumbing out of Littlejohn's home for forensic examination.  They ripped up the floorboards, tore out the walls and sheetrock.

Of course they confiscated all the linens and laundry, all the plumbing traps, all the clothing -- everything.  

NYPD knew this was the guy, and they were gonna nail him.  And they did.

What happened at 19 Montana?

Just askin'.


Wow...way to say it Hammer...WTG!!  Gives rise to many questions doesnt it....



And representing the family of the victim in this would be???  Compare and contrast what happened at the apartment only of his other client.
Basically nothing.  A show in bunny suits for the cameras was about all.

So it isn't as though Joey T doesn't know what a proper search consists of.

Whoever blocked that search should be charged with obstruction of justice and prosecuted.  Witt and Ben King seem two culpable at least.

.


Going after these 2 men with every charge they can throw at them will solve this case.  These 2 men know what happened and they will squeal before they go down for the punk kid joran.  Pressure Witt, vocKING, Carlos, and Janssen.  Are they ALL willing to take the fall for the little man of the ditch?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: blah on November 30, 2006, 06:23:51 AM
Quote from: "San"
Imagine that.  The poor Kalpoes feel uncomfortable about being suspects.  My god these people have no scruples.


HMMMMM

IF the Kalpoes were released as suspects, wouldn that pretty much force Joran to make a move.  After all, he would be the only one left with his butt on the line.  Could get pretty interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 06:35:53 AM
Solo di Pueblo - November 18, 2006 - Page 8
 An article that states Aruba is one of the top ten travel destinations for the Christmas to New Years holiday.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 06:54:32 AM
Solo di Pueblo - November 21, 2006 - section 1
Looks like a teenager was murdered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 07:18:16 AM
Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 30, 2006, 07:51:41 AM
Quote from: vms
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "vms"
Guido's father is Robert Wever...

VMS,
Do you know if Robert Wever has any connection to the landfill?

.


Wasn't that Booshi Wever?


Booshi is the landfill guy.  

Robert is the makeup wearing kid's dad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 07:59:15 AM
Posted by AB on the front page of SM - AB is from the Netherlands:

Peter R. de Vries said that he made those pictures because he is playing a game or he likes to play games and go very far in doing it. One of the two brothers also said: “Joran is a very sick person”.
Joran is feeling very sure about the fact that nobody will solve the case. So he stupidly make himself suspicious.

I was very objective in the last 2 posts but if you ask my personal opinion about the case from a person from the netherlands; “Why act so stupid and suspicious if you are totally innocent?”

Peter R. de Vries said in the Jensen interview: “The only thing we need to solve this case is a little bit of luck on our side and it’s really going to happen.”

About the book: Where do you spend your money from the book sales if you are in jail soon?

ab


GOODMORNING ALL!  Just lurking this morning - have class today and have to get ready to leave soon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 08:03:47 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


No, it was Margaritha e.v. Dijkhoff and she has a different birthdate.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 08:12:49 AM
Klaas:  Margaritha e.v. Dijkhoff is the maid and Ruth Dijkhoff is the one at the bank.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 08:18:58 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Klaas:  Margaritha e.v. Dijkhoff is the maid and Ruth Dijkhoff is the one at the bank.


YOU ARE CORRECT!  I just went back and looked.  That's what I get for waking up so early!

We don't know the age of the Ruth Dijkhoff at the bank.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 08:22:54 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Klaas:  Margaritha e.v. Dijkhoff is the maid and Ruth Dijkhoff is the one at the bank.


YOU ARE CORRECT!  I just went back and looked.  That's what I get for waking up so early!

We don't know the age of the Ruth Dijkhoff at the bank.  :shock:


Ruth Gisela Dijkhoff-Holtmann
17 May 1955 - 18 Jun 2005
Funeral took place in Germany


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 08:35:59 AM
There is a current listing in the Aruba Phone Book
"Dijkhoff, Ruthlin G"              "Palisiaweg 17-c"
Nothing I could find for Holtmann


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 08:37:53 AM
FWIW

MF posted *breaking news*.

With a blank post. Likely a joke. But he has in the past started a blank topic an returned with related content.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 08:42:46 AM
The breaking news from MF is that the case is now in session.

TITO on the scene!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 08:48:31 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
The breaking news from MF is that the case is now in session.

TITO on the scene!

Which means Tito is at the courthouse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 08:48:55 AM
*Breaking News* is more than just the case being heard...per MF.

MF waiting for confirmation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 08:51:55 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
The breaking news from MF is that the case is now in session.

TITO on the scene!

Which means Tito is at the courthouse.

Morning Klaas. I forgot to put a  :P  with my TITO comment. Did not mean to imply anything *big*.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 08:53:45 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
The breaking news from MF is that the case is now in session.

TITO on the scene!

Which means Tito is at the courthouse.

Morning Klaas. I forgot to put a  :P  with my TITO comment. Did not mean to imply anything *big*.


Also added by MF:

Actually I heard additional information but I cannot confirm it as yet, that's why I named the threat breaking news... will be back


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 09:01:57 AM
What could be breaking news while court is still in session?

What time is it in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 09:03:14 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
What could be breaking news while court is still in session?

What time is it in Aruba?

I believe it's 9:11am


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 30, 2006, 09:04:09 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
What could be breaking news while court is still in session?

What time is it in Aruba?


TIME TO TELL THE FREAKING TRUTH?

I doubt it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 09:06:27 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "igsigs"

What time is it in Aruba?


TIME TO TELL THE FREAKING TRUTH?


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 09:59:46 AM
No news yet and I have to leave shortly - hopefully something will be posted soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 10:03:52 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Solo di Pueblo - November 21, 2006 - section 1
Looks like a teenager was murdered.


Leslie - Thanks for that; I'll post on M&C if you haven't. But - I have never figured out how to open that publication (and frankly hate to do that at work). Can it be copied or is it pdf? Would like to get whatever we can, even untranslated, before it's archived.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 10:05:40 AM
Good Morning!  Have a nice day at school Klaas and don't let those pesky students (adults or not) throw too many spitballs.  I have found that adult students can be just as cranky.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 10:06:02 AM
igsigs - thanks for monitoring what's going on. Apparently no flat tires today or whatever today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 10:06:11 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good Morning!  Have a nice day at school Klaas and don't let those pesky students (adults or not) throw too many spitballs.  I have found that adult students can be just as cranky.   :roll:


I love you Christmas avatar.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 10:14:41 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


 :shock: I wonder...quite a similarity in the names. They're dropping like flies in Arbua.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 10:18:17 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Quote
Sue

Maybe Joron was downlaoding porn to get natalee ya know in the mood because that is the way his sick mind works


Wasn't it Satish that put in the DVD of the porn in the call right after Natalee got in?

Seems the pimps MO!  lots of porn and taking advantage of tourist girls.

Did they learn it from the "elders"? as a way of life on that Happy Island?


IBE, lots and lots of good points you raise in your posts.  Yes, to the Wi-Fi, and yes, I think the Dutch in Aruba are obsessed with Hitler and Jews.  They must use that reference like Blacks in America use "Uncle Tom," etc.  Yes, the cartoon was making a point.  I think the Wi-Fi would be workable because Aruba's technology at that point, for reasons that are strange, was better than ours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 10:21:24 AM
Thanks Jacqueline, I think it's me. Hope you are well today. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 10:25:17 AM
How to access Solo di Pueblo

Click on link:
http://www.solodipueblo.com/

When the page opens - look on the left side and see the link
Download Solodipueblo
Click on it

A new page will open with the months listed
Click on November (or any other month you want)

When the page opens - Click on the date you want
The PDF file will download and open by itself
Then you can scroll through the newspaper.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 30, 2006, 10:32:58 AM
Quotes:
Sue:  Maybe Joron was downlaoding porn to get natalee ya know in the mood because that is the way his sick mind works
IBE:  Wasn't it Satish that put in the DVD of the porn in the call right after Natalee got in? Seems the pimps MO! lots of porn and taking advantage of tourist girls.
--
Maybe the scene at Montanja19 was exactly the same as in the car.
Joran was with a real live female and the Kalpoes and/or Paul were watching other people having sex.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 10:38:18 AM
Morning!  Any News?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 10:39:16 AM
This was posted by MoonShadows at FOB:

    Just for clarification...there seem to be a lot of people who don't understand that the hearing covers all three boys, so not just the Kalpoes.

    This is a joint action of the lawyers asking Karin to make the case stronger and prosecute it...or end their "suspect" status.
    [/list]


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
    Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 10:39:38 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Morning!  Any News?


    Not yet.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
    Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 10:40:54 AM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Morning!  Any News?


    Not yet.


    San, those soldiers are sharp.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
    Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 10:41:18 AM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Morning!  Any News?


    Not yet.


    Thx! I LOVE the toy soldiers!!!!! I'm decorating by phases, too! You are my inspiration, San! :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
    Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 10:42:29 AM
    Quote from: "San"
    This was posted by MoonShadows at FOB:

      Just for clarification...there seem to be a lot of people who don't understand that the hearing covers all three boys, so not just the Kalpoes.

      This is a joint action of the lawyers asking Karin to make the case stronger and prosecute it...or end their "suspect" status.
      [/list]


      We all know that KJ is not going to do anything to make this case stronger or she would have done so already.  These 3 are going to be free after all this is done and where does that leave the 2 security guards?  Still suspects, I suppose or were they already released?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 10:43:15 AM
      Quote from: "Jacqueline"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
      Morning!  Any News?


      Not yet.


      San, those soldiers are sharp.

      Thanks Jacq.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 10:43:31 AM
      What's everybody's best guess on what the news will be?


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 10:43:53 AM
      Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
      Quote from: "San"
      Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
      Morning!  Any News?


      Not yet.


      Thx! I LOVE the toy soldiers!!!!! I'm decorating by phases, too! You are my inspiration, San! :wink:

       :lol:


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 10:44:11 AM
      Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
      What's everybody's best guess on what the news will be?


      They will release the Hounds.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 10:45:08 AM
      Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
      What's everybody's best guess on what the news will be?

      They will be released.  This is one time that I hope I am wrong.  Joran is hiding out in the Netherlands.


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 10:51:29 AM
      THEY will all remain SUSPECTS

      K2 AND NUMBER 1 SUSPECT is still JORAN

      they aint going anywhere  8)


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
      Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 10:52:39 AM
      Posted by MoonShadows:

        The hearing is over.  The Judge will now consider the arguments and make his ruling.

        No way to know when that will happen.
        [/list]


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 10:53:12 AM
        Darn! I was hoping someone had a different suspicion, but I think they will be released too.  :cry:

        Well, I'll choose to think they won't be, anyway. Maybe it got a little harder after the recent Interview, huh?


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 10:54:21 AM
        the punks are going down


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 10:54:56 AM
        I am asking our Alabama monkeys for a little help today...below is the link to Rep. Spencer Bacchus' website.  Since I don't live in his district I am basically a nobody as far voting is concerned, yet I still call and email anyway.  I think any and all of us monkeys should remind him and our Senators what is happening today.  If any of you have the time please help me make this happen. Remember that just a few people can make a difference if they try. It would not hurt for all of us to remind our politicians who pays their salaries. TIA

        http://bachus.house.gov/hor/al06/

        http://sessions.senate.gov/contact.htm

        http://shelby.senate.gov/public/?CFID=27791978&CFTOKEN=15680018


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 10:57:15 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        the punks are going down


        That's the spirit, Robots!

        I do believe that someday the truth will bubble up and I don't think those responsible for Natalee's death will be unaffected by it. I just don't have a lot of faith in this particular system to execute that justice.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 10:57:28 AM
        in cases like this..... more often than not

        the TIDE turns



        i sense a TIDAL wave coming for VAN DER SCUMS  8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Kimmy53 on November 30, 2006, 10:58:22 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Darn! I was hoping someone had a different suspicion, but I think they will be released too.  :cry:

        Well, I'll choose to think they won't be, anyway. Maybe it got a little harder after the recent Interview, huh?


        cbb- I am hoping along with you they do NOT release them as suspects.  But I am not going to be surprised if they do release them.  It would be logical to wait until the Dutch team gives their findings - but there has never been anything resembling logic relating to this case.  I would like to know who the judge was hearing this.  Gosh - to be a fly on the wall.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 10:59:02 AM
        well, i think its stupid that a judge would release them as suspects with the DUTCH now involved

        not to mention the devries guy and his little investigation

        time to TURN it up a FEW NOTCHES anyway

        increase the BOYCOTT so that it CRUSHES the island
         8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 11:00:19 AM
        Quote from: "San"

        This is a joint action of the lawyers asking Karin to make the case stronger and prosecute it...or end their "suspect" status.

        Joint action? This screams conspiracy. They are lying and pointing the finger at each other yet their lawyers are promoting them as a unified entity in this action. No reason for this unless they are bound together by guilt.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:00:48 AM
        if the judge releases JORAN as a suspect

        i will go ballistic

        and you dont want that to happen
         :twisted:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Shizaru on November 30, 2006, 11:00:50 AM
        Well, bearing in mind that so far in this case my accuracy rate for predictions/guesses is basically 100%, I will now put that stellar record in jeapardy by making a rare, non-pessimistic  prediction.  Don't know about 2K, but I predict Joran will not be released as a suspect.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 11:01:02 AM
        Quote from: "Ono"
        Quote from: "Leslie"
        Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
        http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


         :shock: I wonder...quite a similarity in the names. They're dropping like flies in Arbua.


        Sharp eye, Leslie.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:01:38 AM
        Quote from: "Shizaru"
        Well, bearing in mind that so far in this case my accuracy rate for predictions/guesses is basically 100%, I will now put that stellar record in jeapardy by making a rare, non-pessimistic  prediction.  Don't know about 2K, but I predict Joran will not be released as a suspect.


        youre safe with your 100 percent rating

        BET the FARM  8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: sharon on November 30, 2006, 11:01:52 AM
        Quote from: "igsigs"
        Quote from: "San"

        This is a joint action of the lawyers asking Karin to make the case stronger and prosecute it...or end their "suspect" status.

        Joint action? This screams conspiracy. They are lying and pointing the finger at each other yet their lawyers are promoting them as a unified entity in this action. No reason for this unless they are bound together by guilt.


        Which then leaves only the 2 security guards remaining as suspects.
        .


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:02:54 AM
        i can sense a tidal wave


         8)

        better get joran an umbrella  8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:03:16 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        i can sense a tidal wave


         8)

        better get joran an umbrella  8)


        how about a nice pink one  :twisted:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 11:03:54 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        well, i think its stupid that a judge would release them as suspects with the DUTCH now involved

        not to mention the devries guy and his little investigation

        time to TURN it up a FEW NOTCHES anyway

        increase the BOYCOTT so that it CRUSHES the island
         8)


        Maybe the Dutch have already made their finding available to Aruba.  They would not tell the public for fear of the outcry for justice overwhelming the island.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:05:17 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "robots"
        i can sense a tidal wave


         8)

        better get joran an umbrella  8)


        how about a nice pink one  :twisted:


        Can I please choose where to stick it??  8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:05:58 AM
        put on my optimistic hat this morning


        it fits fine

        i only bring it out once or twice a year


        Joran is the killer, everyone knows it

        even the stupid judge knows it

        now, lets get rid of that HAG karin andget a real prosecutor  :twisted:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 11:06:57 AM
        Quote from: "igsigs"
        Quote from: "San"

        This is a joint action of the lawyers asking Karin to make the case stronger and prosecute it...or end their "suspect" status.

        Joint action? This screams conspiracy. They are lying and pointing the finger at each other yet their lawyers are promoting them as a unified entity in this action. No reason for this unless they are bound together by guilt.


        igsigs - Your logic is impeccable. Remains to be seen whether the ruling will be.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:07:04 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "robots"
        i can sense a tidal wave


         8)

        better get joran an umbrella  8)


        how about a nice pink one  :twisted:


        Can I please choose where to stick it??  8)


        on his DORKY BIKE ?

        heheehehe  :twisted:

        that picture of him riding a bike twirling an umbrella would be nice


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 11:07:47 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        put on my optimistic hat this morning


        it fits fine

        i only bring it out once or twice a year


        Joran is the killer, everyone knows it

        even the stupid judge knows it

        now, lets get rid of that HAG karin andget a real prosecutor  :twisted:


        I hope you are right.
        Any thoughts on how long it will take before the decision is made public?


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:08:16 AM
        A little closer to the bike seat was where I had in mind!  :wink:  :lol:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:08:47 AM
        Quote from: "Jacqueline"
        Quote from: "robots"
        put on my optimistic hat this morning


        it fits fine

        i only bring it out once or twice a year


        Joran is the killer, everyone knows it

        even the stupid judge knows it

        now, lets get rid of that HAG karin andget a real prosecutor  :twisted:


        I hope you are right.
        Any thoughts on how long it will take before the decision is made public?


        today


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:09:30 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        A little closer to the bike seat was where I had in mind!  :wink:  :lol:


        yes, i like your idea better 8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Peaches on November 30, 2006, 11:09:43 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "robots"
        i can sense a tidal wave


         8)

        better get joran an umbrella  8)


        how about a nice pink one  :twisted:


        Can I please choose where to stick it??  8)


        I was thinking large golf umbrella in a snappy rainbow motif.....


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:10:45 AM
        Quote from: "Peaches"
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "robots"
        i can sense a tidal wave


         8)

        better get joran an umbrella  8)


        how about a nice pink one  :twisted:


        Can I please choose where to stick it??  8)


        I was thinking large golf umbrella in a snappy rainbow motif.....


        that will work 8)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:11:47 AM
        We're going to have to get Robots a Christmas drum, and tell her to keep beating out that optimistic roll all day! The arm action is already there!


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:12:34 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        We're going to have to get Robots a Christmas drum, and tell her to keep beating out that optimistic roll all day! The arm action is already there!


        robots is  GIRL ???????????????????


         :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



        ROFL


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:13:23 AM
        maybe i am a girl robot trapped in a boy robots body  8)  :shock:


         :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:13:44 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        We're going to have to get Robots a Christmas drum, and tell her to keep beating out that optimistic roll all day! The arm action is already there!


        robots is  GIRL ???????????????????


         :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



        ROFL


        OOOOOPPS! You know, I don't really have a clue..............Robots is sorta generic. SOWWY!  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:14:10 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        We're going to have to get Robots a Christmas drum, and tell her to keep beating out that optimistic roll all day! The arm action is already there!


        robots is  GIRL ???????????????????


         :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



        ROFL


        OOOOOPPS! You know, I don't really have a clue..............Robots is sorta generic. SOWWY!  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:




        ROFL

        thats ok........all is forgiven  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:14:52 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        maybe i am a girl robot trapped in a boy robots body  8)  :shock:


         :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


        I've heard of transformers, but transvestites?  :lol:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:15:54 AM
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Quote from: "robots"
        maybe i am a girl robot trapped in a boy robots body  8)  :shock:


         :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


        I've heard of transformers, but transvestites?  :lol:



        klass, will come back and go
         :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:17:22 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
        Quote from: "robots"
        maybe i am a girl robot trapped in a boy robots body  8)  :shock:


         :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


        I've heard of transformers, but transvestites?  :lol:



        klass, will come back and go
         :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


        (http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/lolololol.gif)


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: Kimmy53 on November 30, 2006, 11:18:56 AM
        cbb:  I love your little christmas tree - what happened to the red ornament?  The first time I saw it I thought it was a huge red yo yo! :lol:  :shock:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:18:59 AM
        Gotta run, but will check back for updates. Keep the faith, and have a great day!


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:19:24 AM
        JORAN - "yea sure i knew her a couple years ago"

        Guido -  "really, i did not know that"

        Joran -  "yes, we dated for a bit"

        Joran- "see, i think i have a picture of her and me at a party, its somwhere around here"  "i would NEVER hurt her"


        GUIDO- "cool, lets see it"

        JORAN- "here it is"


        %&*#&$(%)*$(%&$%)*($&%)(*$^)%))^#(*%(#$*
        i hate em all


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: crazybabyborg on November 30, 2006, 11:20:13 AM
        Quote from: "Kimmy53"
        cbb:  I love your little christmas tree - what happened to the red ornament?  The first time I saw it I thought it was a huge red yo yo! :lol:  :shock:


        LOL! Yeah, that's why I changed it to a Christmas tree!  :lol:

        Thank you Kimmy!


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 11:21:04 AM
        Quote from: "robots"
        JORAN - "yea sure i knew her a couple years ago"

        Guido -  "really, i did not know that"

        Joran -  "yes, we dated for a bit"

        Joran- "see, i think i have a picture of her and me at a party, its somwhere around here"  "i would NEVER hurt her"


        GUIDO- "cool, lets see it"

        JORAN- "here it is"


        %&*#&$(%)*$(%&$%)*($&%)(*$^)%))^#(*%(#$*
        i hate em all


         :lol:  :lol:


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
        Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 11:23:25 AM
        Posted by MoonShadows:

          I wish I could tell you, ez.  It could be hours, days or a week.  I don't think it would be more than that.  It depends on how strong the arguments were on both sides...and I'm sure the Judge wants to consider them thoroughly and fairly.  Without knowing the content of the arguments, it's really anyone's guess.[/list]


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 11:23:47 AM
          Quote from: "robots"
          Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
          We're going to have to get Robots a Christmas drum, and tell her to keep beating out that optimistic roll all day! The arm action is already there!


          robots is  GIRL ???????????????????


           :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



          ROFL


          Robots is a dude, I though.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:24:45 AM
          i do not know nor have i ever known ANYONE that would superimpose a picture of themselves with a picture of a missing young lady

          especially when the person doing the superimposing is the PRIME SUSPECT of the missing young lady

          actually i dont want to EVER know anyone like that

          i dont think he will ever find a girls parents that will WELCOME him into their HOUSE, no matter how much ANITA talks about how delicious he is

          if he is so delicious...............then GRAB a BARF BAG cause youre gonna need a dozen of them


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Lala'sMom on November 30, 2006, 11:24:52 AM
          As most of you know, I don't think logically to often in this case...what with my Shango obsession and all...even now, I just find it hard to have hope that things are going to turn in favor of the family this time.   They have been beaten down by everyone on that island.  Jossy is the only person that seems to think the 3 suspects could even remotely be guilty.  I know some have said they think Joran is guilty, but do they really?  Was it all show for the MSM?  Nothing and I mean NOTHING has been done by ALE or the prosecutor's office about this case lately.  They are too busy worrying about their tourist dollars and their gambling revenue to care about one person.  If they were EVER going to do anything it would have been done when they first learned what happened in June...yes, I am very cynical about the outcome....preach on Robots...I need some encouragement.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:25:37 AM
          Quote from: "Jacqueline"
          Quote from: "robots"
          Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
          We're going to have to get Robots a Christmas drum, and tell her to keep beating out that optimistic roll all day! The arm action is already there!


          robots is  GIRL ???????????????????


           :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



          ROFL


          Robots is a dude, I though.


          he is

           :lol:


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:27:04 AM
          woudnt a girl robot becalled "FEMBOTS"


          does DOCTOR EVIL have a job????

          or is he just working in his GARDEN ?


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Florida on November 30, 2006, 11:31:49 AM
          Quote from: "Ono"
          Quote from: "Leslie"
          Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
          http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


           :shock: I wonder...quite a similarity in the names. They're dropping like flies in Arbua.


          Ruth is the maid?
          Marguerite was at the bank?
          Does Marguerite work there?

          Caribbean Mercantile Bank NV
          Palmbeach 4B
          Noord
          Insurance - Brokers & Consultants

          http://www.cmbnv.com/noord.php

          Thanks to Fast Rent House Aruba for this visual map!
          http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Map-Noord.jpg

          (Jaime C. runs each morning from Montanja to the Wendy's...
          He did not run on Tuesday morning...)


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 11:33:21 AM
          Robots - early this morning I posted something re. your "List of Lies" - it's on page 40 of this thread, and there was a bit of discussion about it.

          My post is a 6-item list of lies; covers transportation only.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:34:31 AM
          Quote from: "msmarple"
          Robots - early this morning I posted something re. your "List of Lies" - it's on page 40 of this thread, and there was a bit of discussion about it.

          My post is a 6-item list of lies; covers transportation only.


          hey thanks

          i will take a look right now


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:35:51 AM
          thats nice !!!!

           8)


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: truthseeker2 on November 30, 2006, 11:35:57 AM
          Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
          As most of you know, I don't think logically to often in this case...what with my Shango obsession and all...even now, I just find it hard to have hope that things are going to turn in favor of the family this time.   They have been beaten down by everyone on that island.  Jossy is the only person that seems to think the 3 suspects could even remotely be guilty.  I know some have said they think Joran is guilty, but do they really?  Was it all show for the MSM?  Nothing and I mean NOTHING has been done by ALE or the prosecutor's office about this case lately.  They are too busy worrying about their tourist dollars and their gambling revenue to care about one person.  If they were EVER going to do anything it would have been done when they first learned what happened in June...yes, I am very cynical about the outcome....preach on Robots...I need some encouragement.


          I'm not very optimistic either.  Justice for Natalee hasn't been the priority of anyone in Aruba.  The priority has been to cover their collective azzes.  I wish we knew more about what was actually being presented in court today.  But with the 'secret courts' of Aruba, they can pretty much say and do whatever they want down there.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: San on November 30, 2006, 11:36:11 AM
          Quote from: "robots"
          woudnt a girl robot becalled "FEMBOTS"


          does DOCTOR EVIL have a job????

          or is he just working in his GARDEN ?

           :lol:  Oh god I'm dating myself here.  But Fembots were from the show the Bionic Woman.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:37:12 AM
          Quote from: "San"
          Quote from: "robots"
          woudnt a girl robot becalled "FEMBOTS"


          does DOCTOR EVIL have a job????

          or is he just working in his GARDEN ?

           :lol:  Oh god I'm dating myself here.  But Fembots were from the show the Bionic Woman.


          i liked the DOG

          wasnt his name MAX?
           :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 11:37:26 AM
          Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
          What's everybody's best guess on what the news will be?


          My guess: All three released.

          San: I love those soldiers too. :D


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:38:08 AM
          ROBOTS SAYS

          all 3 REMAIN  8)


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: BTgirl on November 30, 2006, 11:40:01 AM
          BT says, "What you think about is what expands in your life."

          Let's think about all three of them being put UNDER the jail.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Kimmy53 on November 30, 2006, 11:40:17 AM
          Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
          As most of you know, I don't think logically to often in this case...what with my Shango obsession and all...even now, I just find it hard to have hope that things are going to turn in favor of the family this time.   They have been beaten down by everyone on that island.  Jossy is the only person that seems to think the 3 suspects could even remotely be guilty.  I know some have said they think Joran is guilty, but do they really?  Was it all show for the MSM?  Nothing and I mean NOTHING has been done by ALE or the prosecutor's office about this case lately. They are too busy worrying about their tourist dollars and their gambling revenue to care about one person.  If they were EVER going to do anything it would have been done when they first learned what happened in June...yes, I am very cynical about the outcome....preach on Robots...I need some encouragement.


          Lala's - you have hit the nail on the head.  IMO - alot of them think Joran is guilty.  BUT - they don't CARE.  They just want this all to go away.  They NEVER intended on investigating.  They NEVER intended on solving this - because of WHO was involved.  They only care about themselves.  It really sickens me.  I hope this HAUNTS each and every one who has had a hand in this for the rest of their lives.  May none of them have a minutes peace as long as they live.  What goes around comes around - It will - someday......


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:42:28 AM
          no way JORAN is released from SUSPECT status


          not a chance of it


          Bet the FARM              $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 11:48:18 AM
          Quote from: "robots"
          woudnt a girl robot becalled "FEMBOTS"


          does DOCTOR EVIL have a job????

          or is he just working in his GARDEN ?


          'member? He keeps his eye on Carlo at the office.  :shock:

          BTW, I really luv ya Robots!  You are a good Robot.  :wink:


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 11:50:32 AM
          Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
          I am asking our Alabama monkeys for a little help today...below is the link to Rep. Spencer Bacchus' website.  Since I don't live in his district I am basically a nobody as far voting is concerned, yet I still call and email anyway.  I think any and all of us monkeys should remind him and our Senators what is happening today.  If any of you have the time please help me make this happen. Remember that just a few people can make a difference if they try. It would not hurt for all of us to remind our politicians who pays their salaries. TIA

          http://bachus.house.gov/hor/al06/

          http://sessions.senate.gov/contact.htm

          http://shelby.senate.gov/public/?CFID=27791978&CFTOKEN=15680018


          Will do and please include another good guy, Rep. Jo Bonner:

          http://bonner.house.gov/hor/al01/


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 11:51:04 AM
          I really thought the plane would have another flat tire. I'm very surprised the judge showed up.

          On the optimistic side, maybe the judge will do the right thing for fear of coming under the gaze of scrutinizing eyes.  :roll:


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2006, 11:53:32 AM
          Has anyone else noticed that the Mementomori Funeral Home has not posted any obits since June?


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 11:54:18 AM
          Quote from: "memphis"
          Quote from: "robots"
          woudnt a girl robot becalled "FEMBOTS"


          does DOCTOR EVIL have a job????

          or is he just working in his GARDEN ?


          'member? He keeps his eye on Carlo at the office.  :shock:

          BTW, I really luv ya Robots!  You are a good Robot.  :wink:


          thats right, he is the EYE


          tanks. im trying  :lol:  8)


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Florida on November 30, 2006, 11:55:13 AM
          Caribbean Mercantile Bank

          Board of Directors
          Mr. Arleen Shipper  (?)

          R.M. Dijkhoff
          Assistant Managing Director


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Yellow Ribbon on November 30, 2006, 11:58:21 AM
          Hi Monkeys,

          Today it has been a year and a half since Natalee disappeared. I took the opportunity to drive by her house today and as usual there was a large yellow bow on the mailbox. This one looked brand new. May God bless Natalee and her family and may he let them find her and bring her home.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 11:59:48 AM
          Did ya'll see the Corruption and Collusion thread Klaas posted last night?

          Lalas - it seems Gabe was an integral member. If he authored any other posts, he was not wearing a white hat.


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 11:59:52 AM
          Quote from: "robots"
          woudnt a girl robot becalled "FEMBOTS"


          does DOCTOR EVIL have a job????

          or is he just working in his GARDEN ?


          Ms. Robota Fembots? :lol:


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
          Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2006, 12:00:37 PM
          Quote from: "San"
          Posted by MoonShadows:

            I wish I could tell you, ez.  It could be hours, days or a week.  I don't think it would be more than that.  It depends on how strong the arguments were on both sides...and I'm sure the Judge wants to consider them thoroughly and fairly.  Without knowing the content of the arguments, it's really anyone's guess.[/list]


            we need the name of the presiding judge, anyone close to ticklemetito willing to try to find out?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Florida on November 30, 2006, 12:02:16 PM
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Has anyone else noticed that the Mementomori Funeral Home has not posted any obits since June?


            That is strange....

            Mementomori Funeral Home N.V.
            Arendstraat 105, Oranjstad
            Owner: Yolanda Wever
            Paradera, b. 1941


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 12:03:34 PM
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Did ya'll see the Corruption and Collusion thread Klaas posted last night?

            Lalas - it seems Gabe was an integral member. If he authored any other posts, he was not wearing a white hat.



            Gabe Leo posted on the FP within the last week.  I wondered why those of you who think he is Shango didn't run over there and at least ask him.

            .


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:04:05 PM
            Quote from: "truthseeker2"
            Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
            As most of you know, I don't think logically to often in this case...what with my Shango obsession and all...even now, I just find it hard to have hope that things are going to turn in favor of the family this time.   They have been beaten down by everyone on that island.  Jossy is the only person that seems to think the 3 suspects could even remotely be guilty.  I know some have said they think Joran is guilty, but do they really?  Was it all show for the MSM?  Nothing and I mean NOTHING has been done by ALE or the prosecutor's office about this case lately.  They are too busy worrying about their tourist dollars and their gambling revenue to care about one person.  If they were EVER going to do anything it would have been done when they first learned what happened in June...yes, I am very cynical about the outcome....preach on Robots...I need some encouragement.


            I'm not very optimistic either.  Justice for Natalee hasn't been the priority of anyone in Aruba.  The priority has been to cover their collective azzes.  I wish we knew more about what was actually being presented in court today.  But with the 'secret courts' of Aruba, they can pretty much say and do whatever they want down there.


            In reality, they're probably having a brunch complete with mimosas.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 12:05:32 PM
            Quote from: "Florida"
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Has anyone else noticed that the Mementomori Funeral Home has not posted any obits since June?


            That is strange....

            Mementomori Funeral Home N.V.
            Arendstraat 105, Oranjstad
            Owner: Yolanda Wever
            Paradera, b. 1941


            I'm not surprised.
            Did ya'll read the Corruption and Collusion thread Klaas posted last night?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:06:33 PM
            Quote from: "Yellow Ribbon"
            Hi Monkeys,

            Today it has been a year and a half since Natalee disappeared. I took the opportunity to drive by her house today and as usual there was a large yellow bow on the mailbox. This one looked brand new. May God bless Natalee and her family and may he let them find her and bring her home.


            Amen.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 12:07:12 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Did ya'll see the Corruption and Collusion thread Klaas posted last night?

            Lalas - it seems Gabe was an integral member. If he authored any other posts, he was not wearing a white hat.



            Gabe Leo posted on the FP within the last week.  I wondered why those of you who think he is Shango didn't run over there and at least ask him.

            .


            I saw it and it made me think they might be right. Who knows.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Florida on November 30, 2006, 12:09:18 PM
            For Natalee

            18 months.............................

            http://i.euniverse.com/funpages/cms_content/2529/4candles.swf


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:09:54 PM
            Quote from: "Florida"
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Has anyone else noticed that the Mementomori Funeral Home has not posted any obits since June?


            That is strange....

            Mementomori Funeral Home N.V.
            Arendstraat 105, Oranjstad
            Owner: Yolanda Wever
            Paradera, b. 1941


            Maybe they have closed ?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 12:11:48 PM
            Take a look at the Corruption and Collusion.

            I know many already know what was going on, but it is there in black and white. They were very organized.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 12:11:57 PM
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:12:05 PM
            Quote from: "Florida"
            For Natalee

            18 months.............................

            http://i.euniverse.com/funpages/cms_content/2529/4candles.swf


            That is lovely ~


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2006, 12:13:26 PM
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Take a look at the Corruption and Collusion.

            I know many already know what was going on, but it is there in black and white. They were very organized.


            I just reviewed it Memphis and second your emotion, it's good work isn't it?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2006, 12:14:23 PM
            Quote from: "Ono"
            Quote from: "Florida"
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Has anyone else noticed that the Mementomori Funeral Home has not posted any obits since June?


            That is strange....

            Mementomori Funeral Home N.V.
            Arendstraat 105, Oranjstad
            Owner: Yolanda Wever
            Paradera, b. 1941


            Maybe they have closed ?


            If they closed, wouldn't they take their web site down?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: memphis on November 30, 2006, 12:14:52 PM
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Take a look at the Corruption and Collusion.

            I know many already know what was going on, but it is there in black and white. They were very organized.


            I just reviewed it Memphis and second your emotion, it's good work isn't it?


            Hi None. There's just something about seeing it spelled out. It really comes home.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: blah on November 30, 2006, 12:16:51 PM
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:20:26 PM
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Take a look at the Corruption and Collusion.

            I know many already know what was going on, but it is there in black and white. They were very organized.


             :shock: It's excellent.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 12:22:45 PM
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:22:56 PM
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Quote from: "Ono"
            Quote from: "Florida"
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Has anyone else noticed that the Mementomori Funeral Home has not posted any obits since June?


            That is strange....

            Mementomori Funeral Home N.V.
            Arendstraat 105, Oranjstad
            Owner: Yolanda Wever
            Paradera, b. 1941


            Maybe they have closed ?


            If they closed, wouldn't they take their web site down?


            There's no telling -- it's Aruba; That is totally odd, however.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Buckeye on November 30, 2006, 12:24:33 PM
            Quote from: "Leslie"
            Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
            http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:24:46 PM
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            However, I can certainly see his need for one. How did they know that he had one I wonder ?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: nonesuche on November 30, 2006, 12:25:04 PM
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Ono on November 30, 2006, 12:25:30 PM
            Quote from: "Buckeye"
            Quote from: "Leslie"
            Is this the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paul spoke to at the bank on May 30, 2005?
            http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


            That is creepy, isn't it?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 12:25:38 PM
            Quote from: "Ono"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            However, I can certainly see his need for one. How did they know that he had one I wonder ?


            I was thinking the same thing....They must have gotten a search warrant to search...Maybe someone tipped off the police?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 12:27:18 PM
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            I'm not sure...I know someone who filed a law suit against him mysteriously got the tar beaten out of him about a week ago, I posted a story about it...


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Buckeye on November 30, 2006, 12:29:52 PM
            Quote from: "Leslie"
            Quotes:
            Sue:  Maybe Joron was downlaoding porn to get natalee ya know in the mood because that is the way his sick mind works
            IBE:  Wasn't it Satish that put in the DVD of the porn in the call right after Natalee got in? Seems the pimps MO! lots of porn and taking advantage of tourist girls.
            --
            Maybe the scene at Montanja19 was exactly the same as in the car.
            Joran was with a real live female and the Kalpoes and/or Paul were watching other people having sex.


            Yep!!  or Paulus wasn't watching...but getting a film of his own for "father's day".


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: blah on November 30, 2006, 12:39:28 PM
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            yeah!  he should have at least stuck it under his pillow!!  :roll:





             :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: blah on November 30, 2006, 12:41:23 PM
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            I saw an interview with him yesterday flat out denying he even offered the rewards,  He is claiming that his signature is forged on the paperwork.  I found this pretty tough to swallow because I like Joe


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 12:43:43 PM
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            I saw an interview with him yesterday flat out denying he even offered the rewards,  He is claiming that his signature is forged on the paperwork.  I found this pretty tough to swallow because I like Joe


            I like him too.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Florida on November 30, 2006, 12:44:10 PM
            Quote from: "Buckeye"
            Quote from: "Leslie"
            Quotes:
            Sue:  Maybe Joron was downlaoding porn to get natalee ya know in the mood because that is the way his sick mind works
            IBE:  Wasn't it Satish that put in the DVD of the porn in the call right after Natalee got in? Seems the pimps MO! lots of porn and taking advantage of tourist girls.
            --
            Maybe the scene at Montanja19 was exactly the same as in the car.
            Joran was with a real live female and the Kalpoes and/or Paul were watching other people having sex.


            Yep!!  or Paulus wasn't watching...but getting a film of his own for "father's day".


            This is why I feel Freddy was with Joran.....

            Joran visits 3 porn sites
            Back Seat.............................Website registered in Curacao

            Nasty Dollars.....................2 films downloaded
            All Sites Access...................Both Websites registered in Miami, Fl
                                                    (same address)

            At one time, on the site it featured a private video vault
            Similar to this:

            NASTY DOLLARS Picture Gallery Builder
            How would you like to be able to have a batch of 100 galleries made for you in under 3 minutes? With our gallery builder you can choose from a number of templates and picture sets to make hundreds of galleries in a matter of minutes! Add that capability with our custom content and we are talking about a revolutionary concept...okay, maybe its just REALLY cool. ;-)


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 12:48:14 PM
            Check out this info niblet:

            :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            DEEPAK 06/13/2005 ALE INTERROGATION

            We are picking up mid statement.Deepak is recalling events of the early morning hours the night the Holloway/Twittys arrived. They boys and Paulus are coming back from the Holiday Inn trip in search of Natalee.

            --------------------------------

            The police officers drove from the Holiday Inn to Joran’s house. The police had dropped us off at Joran's house. One of the police officers in the car said that he knew Joran, he had been to Joran's house once, because someone had thrown a brick through his window.

            *** hardy harrr friggin harrrrr -
            I wonder who that could have been. *******

            -cont'd ( important pay attention to where the boys and Paulus sit down and talk! )

            *********************************************************

            We then went to Joran's room because Joran's dad
            wanted to talk to us so we sat down on the floor,

            *********************************************************

            because Joran's mattresses were on the floor in his room.

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            Joran's father said to us, see boys what kind of problems this had caused. Then he asked us what we had learned from this. I answered, never offer someone a ride. Joran agreed with me. It was already about 06:10 hours, and I said that it really is late and that I had to go home. I got up and walked to the door. Joran had also said that he had to go to school later. His father had also asked him what time he had to go to school. I didn't hear what answer Joran gave his father. I said my goodbyes and drove home. I went with my car and drove home via the road leading through Paradera.


            ???


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 12:54:30 PM
            (http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/splainin.png)


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 01:23:39 PM
            .
            Joe Mammana offers rewards for the arrest and conviction in various cases.  There have been no convictions in the cases in question.  Didn't you listen to his interview on Dana's radio show?

            I believe the suspects in those cases have been released without trial although there was an indictment.  Anyone could be arrested but it is a conviction that counts.  In fact if someone wanted to scam a reward, they could arrange for someone to be arrested and released and split the reward if it were given out without convictions.

             :shock:

            Joe said he would still pay in those cases if there were convictions.

            .


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: mishy on November 30, 2006, 01:25:29 PM
            Hey monkeys...

            this is what I read about Joe M in the article about him being arrested for having a gun in his nightstand. I don't blame him for having a gun, because as None said, he is a target...

            Here is what Joe says Crime Stoppers:

            Mammana said Crime Stoppers knew he pays reward money only when an arrest results in a conviction. He also said the group forged his name on a contract.

            Have a great day...Gotta get back to work!!!!

             :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 01:26:11 PM
            FOX - GRETA JORAN INTERVIEW 3/2006

            At some point you and Natalee separated according to you is that right?  

            Joran van der Sloot:  Yes.  

            Interviewer:  How did that come about?  

            Joran van der Sloot:  Well, I mean I had... I had to go to school the next day. I was close to my exams to do my final exams and, you know, the bus was picking me up at six forty a m I mean I had to go home and I didn't want my dad to go into my room and see I'm not there or anything like that, so I mean I had to go home. So, yes, at one point I told her, you know, it's time to go back to your hotel and she was just like, "No, let's stay here. Let's look at the stars."






            JORAN 6/14/2005 ALE STATEMENT

            After that we walked in the direction of Fisherman's Huts/ On the way there I told Natalee that the stars were beautiful. Natalee told me that there were no stars.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: mishy on November 30, 2006, 01:27:57 PM
            :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:  No stars!?!?!?

            Interesting catch Carpe!


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 01:28:32 PM
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Quote from: "memphis"
            Did ya'll see the Corruption and Collusion thread Klaas posted last night?

            Lalas - it seems Gabe was an integral member. If he authored any other posts, he was not wearing a white hat.



            Gabe Leo posted on the FP within the last week.  I wondered why those of you who think he is Shango didn't run over there and at least ask him.

            .


            I saw it and it made me think they might be right. Who knows.




            Makes me think no way is he Shango but if I thought that he were and had all the answers to everything, I'd at least respond to his posting.  Don't think anyone even acknowledged that he did post.  Doesn't sound a thing like Shango, in fact holds totally opposite points of view.

            But here is this person with all the answers still posting among us and no one even speaks to him.  That's just odd to me.  And he doesn't seem to know any more than the rest of us, either.

            .


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 01:29:22 PM
            difficult to see the stars when you are being raped and beaten
            in a bedroom on a mattress that is on the floor  :evil:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 01:30:56 PM
            where is INFO BABE..??

            er ahh uhh i mean where is Klass ???


             8)


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 30, 2006, 01:31:58 PM
            Quote from: "robots"
            where is INFO BABE..??

            er ahh uhh i mean where is Klass ???


             8)


            Teaching her class, robots.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: robots on November 30, 2006, 01:32:54 PM
            Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
            Quote from: "robots"
            where is INFO BABE..??

            er ahh uhh i mean where is Klass ???


             8)


            Teaching her class, robots.



            ohhhhhhhhhh  thats right
            teaching the Klass

             :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

            thanks


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: mishy on November 30, 2006, 01:34:56 PM
            Quote from: "robots"
            difficult to see the stars when you are being raped and beaten
            in a bedroom on a mattress that is on the floor  :evil:


             :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 01:39:24 PM
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            Check out this info niblet:

            :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            We then went to Joran's room because Joran's dad
            wanted to talk to us so we sat down on the floor,

            *********************************************************

            because Joran's mattresses were on the floor in his room.

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            Joran's father said to us, see boys what kind of problems this had caused. Then he asked us what we had learned from this. I answered, never offer someone a ride. Joran agreed with me. It was already about 06:10 hours, and I said that it really is late and that I had to go home. I got up and walked to the door. Joran had also said that he had to go to school later. His father had also asked him what time he had to go to school. I didn't hear what answer Joran gave his father. I said my goodbyes and drove home. I went with my car and drove home via the road leading through Paradera.


            ???



            Did you see the photo Klaas posted in the last couple of days of the mattress?  It is more like a kindergarten nap mat except bigger, not like a real mattress at all.  

            Strange it was on the floor.  Does Joran sleep on it on the floor or what?  Was it on the floor for another reason?  If Joran had all these sleep overs that Anita says, does that mean they slept on the floor, too?  On the concrete or on the mattress or what?

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 01:40:27 PM
            Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
            Quote from: "robots"
            where is INFO BABE..??

            er ahh uhh i mean where is Klass ???


             8)


            Teaching her class, robots.


            Hey 2njSONS MOM!  :lol:  :lol:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 01:40:56 PM
            Quote from: "robots"
            difficult to see the stars when you are being raped and beaten
            in a bedroom on a mattress that is on the floor  :evil:


            Especially if you are drugged and unconscious.

             :evil:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 01:44:47 PM
            I believe Joe Mammana is married.  G Gordon Liddy says as a convicted felon that he, G Gordon, cannot own a gun but that Mrs. Liddy has quite an extensive collection.

            So I wonder if Joe owns the gun or if it belongs to his wife.   :wink:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 01:54:24 PM
            Something about the court appearance today I don't understand.  Since it is a murder investigation it can be reopened at any time with no statute of limitations, right?  So basically having the status as suspect lifted does not change anything much does it?

            It's not as though we are going to suddenly forget about them so the reason must be something else.  Maybe they don't want to have to list it on things like job applications or college entrance exams, things that might ask if you are involved in any ongoing criminal investigations?

            Like maybe getting them off the list watched in airports, etc.  Remember Joran being detained by customs when he flew into NY?  Because otherwise, I can't see that it does anything.

            I also find it hard to believe the lawyers are asking KJ to make the case STRONGER so she can take it to court??  That must be some sort of translation error

            So if K2 are released as suspects, what does it really mean or what does it change .  I don't understand their system.   :?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2006, 02:05:06 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Something about the court appearance today I don't understand.  Since it is a murder investigation it can be reopened at any time with no statute of limitations, right?  So basically having the status as suspect lifted does not change anything much does it?.....


            Anna:  If I remember correctly, we were told at the beginning that on Aruba the Statute of Limitations is only two years.  It is here in the U.S. where there is no statute of limitations on murder.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 02:05:58 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Something about the court appearance today I don't understand.  Since it is a murder investigation it can be reopened at any time with no statute of limitations, right?  So basically having the status as suspect lifted does not change anything much does it?
            It's not as though we are going to suddenly forget about them so the reason must be something else.  Maybe they don't want to have to list it on things like job applications or college entrance exams, things that might ask if you are involved in any ongoing criminal investigations?

            Like maybe getting them off the list watched in airports, etc.  Remember Joran being detained by customs when he flew into NY?  Because otherwise, I can't see that it does anything.

            I also find it hard to believe the lawyers are asking KJ to make the case STRONGER so she can take it to court??  That must be some sort of translation error

            So if K2 are released as suspects, what does it really mean or what does it change .  I don't understand their system.   :?


            You know Anna, I have tried to get a clear answer to that question from the beginning of this whole mess. I know there is no statute of limitations on murder in this Country.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 30, 2006, 02:06:28 PM
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
            Quote from: "robots"
            where is INFO BABE..??

            er ahh uhh i mean where is Klass ???


             8)


            Teaching her class, robots.


            Hey 2njSONS MOM!  :lol:  :lol:


            Ciao, Jacquelina.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: friend of monkeys on November 30, 2006, 02:06:39 PM
            Quote from: "memphis"
            I really thought the plane would have another flat tire. I'm very surprised the judge showed up.

            On the optimistic side, maybe the judge will do the right thing for fear of coming under the gaze of scrutinizing eyes.  :roll:



            so far so good i think....MJ is off suspect list..


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 02:07:30 PM
            this little chit is calculating... and cold blooded.

            He's inventing the beach walk... we all know that already.

            ...but he is crafting these stories for a reason. These details
               are carefully planned to create confusion and doubt.

            1. If he claims they walked near the fisherman huts...
                he sets the stage for someone to think...the fisherman
                did it. As we can see, this tactic works on people with
                the IQ of an effin cactus.

            2. He says Deepak dropped him off first, then Satish dropped
                him off at home. It is imperative
                that he draw a Kalpoe in to it. He then plants a seed
                in someone's mind... maybe a Kalpoe did it!!!... when
                Deepak or Satish drove back back from Joran's to home.

            3. He says there's someone else's DNA on Nat's toothbrush...
                and that the Current Affair reporter should investigate
                the MB students!
               

            4. I know there has to be a crafty reason that he says at first
                Lighthouse & later... no lighthouse, we went to my house.
                There's evidence or witnesse(s) --- something that requires
                him being in that location at that time. ( sumpin' maybe
                not even known publicly just yet.)

            This li'l SOB is evil. :twisted: -J4N-


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: igsigs on November 30, 2006, 02:07:34 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            So if K2 are released as suspects, what does it really mean or what does it change .  I don't understand their system.   :?

            I don't think it means too much Anna. It could possibly limit ALE's investigative powers re the suspects, like phone taps or surveillance. Beyond that i do not know.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Sue on November 30, 2006, 02:08:37 PM
            Quote from Anna:
            So if K2 are released as suspects, what does it really mean or what does it change . I don't understand their system.


            If they are released they lose the title of suspect.. But Under dutch
            law If CREDIBLE evidence comes forward they can be brought back
            in for questioning and labeled a suspect for another 2 years
            to me them being released doesnt mean anything since the case is still
            under investigation.. If anything comes forward there right back where
            they started from and the clock starts ticking again


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: friend of monkeys on November 30, 2006, 02:09:16 PM
            Quote from: "robots"
            difficult to see the stars when you are being raped and beaten
            in a bedroom on a mattress that is on the floor  :evil:


            gotta agree with you there

            whatever happened...no ...there were no stars


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Jacqueline on November 30, 2006, 02:11:02 PM
            Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
            Quote from: "robots"
            where is INFO BABE..??

            er ahh uhh i mean where is Klass ???


             8)


            Teaching her class, robots.


            Hey 2njSONS MOM!  :lol:  :lol:


            Ciao, Jacquelina.


            Che se dice, bella mi?   :lol:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: msmarple on November 30, 2006, 02:11:38 PM
            Quote from: "Leslie"
            Solo di Pueblo - November 21, 2006 - section 1
            Looks like a teenager was murdered.


            Turns out this one was on Curacao. Thanks for looking out, Leslie.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 30, 2006, 02:11:47 PM
            MF at FOB:

            Posted: Thu Nov 30th, 2006 02:09 pm   Quote     Reply  
             
            This is part of the Breaking News I wanted to share: The security guards are still suspects in the case of Natalee Holloway.

            In court today was the lawyer for the Security Guard Mickey John.

            They also started a case months ago where they also asked for his name to cleared as suspects.

            The judge initially denied this.

            So they went once again today. Finally the Prosecutor agreed that there is indeed no reason to keep having Mickey John as a suspect in the case.

            The judge will make his decision known in two weeks.

             


            FOM just posted same.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 02:19:50 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            Check out this info niblet:

            :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            We then went to Joran's room because Joran's dad
            wanted to talk to us so we sat down on the floor,

            *********************************************************

            because Joran's mattresses were on the floor in his room.

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            Joran's father said to us, see boys what kind of problems this had caused. Then he asked us what we had learned from this. I answered, never offer someone a ride. Joran agreed with me. It was already about 06:10 hours, and I said that it really is late and that I had to go home. I got up and walked to the door. Joran had also said that he had to go to school later. His father had also asked him what time he had to go to school. I didn't hear what answer Joran gave his father. I said my goodbyes and drove home. I went with my car and drove home via the road leading through Paradera.


            ???



            Did you see the photo Klaas posted in the last couple of days of the mattress?  It is more like a kindergarten nap mat except bigger, not like a real mattress at all.  

            Strange it was on the floor.  Does Joran sleep on it on the floor or what?  Was it on the floor for another reason?  If Joran had all these sleep overs that Anita says, does that mean they slept on the floor, too?  On the concrete or on the mattress or what?

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



            No I have not seen them. I'd love to see a pic of the mattresses.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: friend of monkeys on November 30, 2006, 02:21:36 PM
            2 NJ------internet is amazing......so is hotmail..lol...just got my breaking news.....K@ going in as MJ went out..they would not even look at MJ


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 02:22:34 PM
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            this little chit is calculating... and cold blooded.

            He's inventing the beach walk... we all know that already.

            ...but he is crafting these stories for a reason. These details
               are carefully planned to create confusion and doubt.
            -----------snipped for brevity------------------

            This li'l SOB is evil. :twisted: -J4N-



            Carpe,
            I agree.  This is what I, too, have thought he was doing.  I believe when Paulus went to work for the lawyer Carlos, he got any files he did not already have and he and Joran began to go over them.

            To someone Joran admitted spending hours daily on the files in the dossier.  When he finds something that could nab him he invents a lie to cover it.  He already has that lie in place by the time ALE drags their feet around to asking about it.

            I call them designer lies but they all have a reason.  You are right about that.  Sometimes that reason doesn't surface until much later.

            .


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Anna on November 30, 2006, 02:25:23 PM
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            [
            No I have not seen them. I'd love to see a pic of the mattresses.



            Carpe,
            You have more photos than most of us and bet you have one of them.  Remember when Melody and her friend were in Joran's apartment, licking his pimples, etc.?  There is at least one of just the two girls and you can see the mattress pretty well in that one.

            If you don't have it yourself, I will see if I can find it but bet you do.   :wink:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2006, 02:31:52 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            [
            No I have not seen them. I'd love to see a pic of the mattresses.



            Carpe,
            You have more photos than most of us and bet you have one of them.  Remember when Melody and her friend were in Joran's apartment, licking his pimples, etc.?  There is at least one of just the two girls and you can see the mattress pretty well in that one.

            If you don't have it yourself, I will see if I can find it but bet you do.   :wink:


            Anna: Thanks for bringing up the pimple licking pic.  My stomach had finally started to settle down after seeing them months ago.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: friend of monkeys on November 30, 2006, 02:33:20 PM
            Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
            2 NJ------internet is amazing......so is hotmail..lol...just got my breaking news.....K@ going in as MJ went out..they would not even look at MJ


            edited...K2   would not look up......wonder if judge lets them off....i think not....


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 02:35:45 PM
            Joran and his

            NATALEE saw stars

            NATALEE did not see stars

            ------------

            Both occurences he said took place on the fake beach walk.

            One was from a police interrogation... 6/14/2005

            the other, the FOX GRETA 3/2006 Interview.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: carpe noctem on November 30, 2006, 02:38:45 PM
            Quote from: "Katysmom"
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            [
            No I have not seen them. I'd love to see a pic of the mattresses.



            Carpe,
            You have more photos than most of us and bet you have one of them.  Remember when Melody and her friend were in Joran's apartment, licking his pimples, etc.?  There is at least one of just the two girls and you can see the mattress pretty well in that one.

            If you don't have it yourself, I will see if I can find it but bet you do.   :wink:


            Anna: Thanks for bringing up the pimple licking pic.  My stomach had finally started to settle down after seeing them months ago.



            TY, Anna

            That is on his FLIKR Photo Blog. I'll look them again.

            ------------

            LOL Katy.  :lol:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Peaches on November 30, 2006, 02:40:36 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            I believe Joe Mammana is married.  G Gordon Liddy says as a convicted felon that he, G Gordon, cannot own a gun but that Mrs. Liddy has quite an extensive collection.

            So I wonder if Joe owns the gun or if it belongs to his wife.   :wink:


            I thought I read it was registered to his father in 1979.  And yes, I believe his wife would be allowed to own a gun.  I bet she could keep it in her nightstand if she so desired.  

            Paying for convictions is the only way it makes sense to pay at all.  Look at this case.  Lots of arrests.  No susbstantial follow up and/or investigation.  Result:  no conviction, no reward.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 02:41:36 PM
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            I thought it was the way the contracts were written about the rewards that the fellow on Dana's program did not like.  I had not heard anything about him "not paying" when clues and information led to conviction.  Have I missed something?  I think he is a target and Joe Tackyface is going after him with the help of the arseholes on Refugees.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 02:42:28 PM
            Back from class - so I take it the judge has not given his decision yet?  

            Red dodged the bullet again as far as changing threads, lol  :lol:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 02:42:38 PM
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            I'm not sure...I know someone who filed a law suit against him mysteriously got the tar beaten out of him about a week ago, I posted a story about it...


            Too bad it was not our delicious sporter.  But does he have any tar in him?  I think he is a weak boy with sap flowing through his ovaries.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: the big hammer on November 30, 2006, 02:42:49 PM
            Security Guards Remain Suspects !?!

            *****************************************
            2NJSons_Mom writes:

            MF at FOB: Posted: Thu Nov 30th, 2006 02:09 pm Quote Reply

            This is part of the Breaking News I wanted to share: The security guards are still suspects in the case of Natalee Holloway. In court today was the lawyer for the Security Guard Mickey John. They also started a case months ago where they also asked for his name to cleared as suspects.

            The judge initially denied this.

            So they went once again today. Finally the Prosecutor agreed that there is indeed no reason to keep having Mickey John as a suspect in the case.
            The judge will make his decision known in two weeks.


            ******************************************

            Mickey Johns has been a suspect for 18 months.  Charges include murder of Natalee Holloway.  He was arrested and detained on June 5, 2005.

            What evidence was produced to support his arrest, detention and to maintain his current status as "suspect"?

            .


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 30, 2006, 02:43:58 PM
            Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
            Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
            2 NJ------internet is amazing......so is hotmail..lol...just got my breaking news.....K@ going in as MJ went out..they would not even look at MJ


            edited...K2   would not look up......wonder if judge lets them off....i think not....


            Eye contact didn't seem to be an issue at earlier hearings.  Time will tell.  :wink:


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Katysmom on November 30, 2006, 02:45:25 PM
            Quote from: "Tylergal"
            Quote from: "nonesuche"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            Quote from: "blah"
            Quote from: "Jacqueline"
            http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/16131984.htm

            JOE BADMAMAJAMA ARRESTED IN PHILLY


            He is getting harrased for not paying those rewards, as well he should.  I cant believe he is pulling that crap.


            I can't believe he is that cavalier to have a gun in his house, on the night stand no less when he is a convicted felon. :shock:


            Jacq-

            reality is, short of having a bodyguard Joe is a target - double-edged sword but have they proven he isn't anteing up the reward money? I guess I dropped off the face of this, but is he really that stoopid as to offer it and not deliver it?


            I thought it was the way the contracts were written about the rewards that the fellow on Dana's program did not like.  I had not heard anything about him "not paying" when clues and information led to conviction.  Have I missed something?  I think he is a target and Joe Tackyface is going after him with the help of the arseholes on Refugees.


            Isn't John Q Joe's attorney?


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: Tylergal on November 30, 2006, 02:45:54 PM
            Quote from: "Anna"
            Quote from: "carpe noctem"
            Check out this info niblet:

            :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            We then went to Joran's room because Joran's dad
            wanted to talk to us so we sat down on the floor,

            *********************************************************

            because Joran's mattresses were on the floor in his room.

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

            *********************************************************

            Joran's father said to us, see boys what kind of problems this had caused. Then he asked us what we had learned from this. I answered, never offer someone a ride. Joran agreed with me. It was already about 06:10 hours, and I said that it really is late and that I had to go home. I got up and walked to the door. Joran had also said that he had to go to school later. His father had also asked him what time he had to go to school. I didn't hear what answer Joran gave his father. I said my goodbyes and drove home. I went with my car and drove home via the road leading through Paradera.


            ???



            Did you see the photo Klaas posted in the last couple of days of the mattress?  It is more like a kindergarten nap mat except bigger, not like a real mattress at all.  

            Strange it was on the floor.  Does Joran sleep on it on the floor or what?  Was it on the floor for another reason?  If Joran had all these sleep overs that Anita says, does that mean they slept on the floor, too?  On the concrete or on the mattress or what?

             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


            Do you remember where all these people came home with him from carnival and one was said to have slept on the "mattress" on the floor with some girl that is always in the pictures, and one of the girls was one taht went to ALE against Joran, but later recanted her testimony.  I think that his crappy apartment is just a flop pad for animals who rape women.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #550 11/28 - 11/29/2006
            Post by: klaasend on November 30, 2006, 02:46:57 PM
            (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

            Please move to LCD# 551

            http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=598