Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 07:46:19 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 07:46:19 PM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:18:26 PM
Hello anyone home?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 01, 2006, 08:20:05 PM
Howdy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:20:19 PM
Katiesmom, I don't think Klaasend was referring to you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 01, 2006, 08:22:41 PM
Quote
when they wanted to searche the house the door was opened by mr. Ben King, an assistent of the Procurements Gen. office.: the highest justice-office on the island and a friend of the family who wanted to support the VdSloots in these difficult times… So clearly the search of the house hadn’t been a surprise to the VdSloots. And the police had a warrant for the complete estate but a judge - Bob Wit - who was at the house as well said only Jorans room could be searched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:24:12 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote
when they wanted to searche the house the door was opened by mr. Ben King, an assistent of the Procurements Gen. office.: the highest justice-office on the island and a friend of the family who wanted to support the VdSloots in these difficult times… So clearly the search of the house hadn’t been a surprise to the VdSloots. And the police had a warrant for the complete estate but a judge - Bob Wit - who was at the house as well said only Jorans room could be searched.


Apparently aruba has no laws about conflict of interest.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 01, 2006, 08:24:22 PM
Geraldo up next on O reilly re: aruba


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 08:26:13 PM
Good evening monkeyfaces....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 08:27:54 PM
Guys, I didn't make the O'reily thing. But it hasn't been on yet. Jacqueline, the song sounds like a groucho thing. Daddy taught it to us when we were kids at the pool and would play games with other kids swimming through a line of legs. It always made me laugh.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 08:29:57 PM
It's Geraldo who is going to talk about Aruba... right now they are talking about Danny DeVito....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:30:14 PM
PSYCHOPATHS

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/joranvds-1.jpg)
"Sporter""

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/scott_peterson.jpg)
Scooter"

A psychopath is defined as having no concern for the feelings of others and a complete disregard for any sense of social obligation. They seem egocentric and lack insight and any sense of responsibility or consequence. Their emotions are thought to be superficial and shallow, if they exist at all. They are considered callous, manipulative, and incapable of forming lasting relationships, let alone of any kind of love. It is thought that any emotions which the true psychopath exhibits are the fruits of watching and mimicking other people's emotions. They show poor impulse control and a low tolerance for frustration and aggression. They have no empathy, remorse, anxiety or guilt in relation to their behavior. In short, they truly are devoid of conscience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#What_is_a_psychopath.3F


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 01, 2006, 08:31:57 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Katiesmom, I don't think Klaasend was referring to you.


Nope, she was referring to that bad Carnut. We have all forgiven him now, though.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:35:00 PM
Oh boy BOR and Geraldo ought to go down there and solve the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 08:35:44 PM
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:35:50 PM
Which house is O'Reilly referring to?

The main house or Joran's?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:35:58 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
PSYCHOPATHS
A psychopath is defined as having no concern for the feelings of others and a complete disregard for any sense of social obligation. They seem egocentric and lack insight and any sense of responsibility or consequence. Their emotions are thought to be superficial and shallow, if they exist at all. They are considered callous, manipulative, and incapable of forming lasting relationships, let alone of any kind of love. It is thought that any emotions which the true psychopath exhibits are the fruits of watching and mimicking other people's emotions. They show poor impulse control and a low tolerance for frustration and aggression. They have no empathy, remorse, anxiety or guilt in relation to their behavior. In short, they truly are devoid of conscience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#What_is_a_psychopath.3F


Un oh, looks like me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 08:36:22 PM
DANA PRETZER - 9PM EASTERN

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/12/01/dana-pretzer-show-special-guests-atty-michael-winston-jossy-mansur-jacque-hollander/

Call In Number 1-877-842-7884


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 01, 2006, 08:36:54 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Which house is O'Reilly referring to?

The main house or Joran's?


I'm thinking the main house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:37:18 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Florida"
PSYCHOPATHS
A psychopath is defined as having no concern for the feelings of others and a complete disregard for any sense of social obligation. They seem egocentric and lack insight and any sense of responsibility or consequence. Their emotions are thought to be superficial and shallow, if they exist at all. They are considered callous, manipulative, and incapable of forming lasting relationships, let alone of any kind of love. It is thought that any emotions which the true psychopath exhibits are the fruits of watching and mimicking other people's emotions. They show poor impulse control and a low tolerance for frustration and aggression. They have no empathy, remorse, anxiety or guilt in relation to their behavior. In short, they truly are devoid of conscience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#What_is_a_psychopath.3F


Un oh, looks like me.


Carnut, have you ever killed animals?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 08:37:40 PM
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 08:38:14 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Which house is O'Reilly referring to?

The main house or Joran's?

He has to mean the main house since that's the part that wasn't searched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 01, 2006, 08:39:46 PM
Call in to Dana with Questions for either:
1. Attorney Michael Winston
2. Jossy Mansur
3. Jacque Hollander

Call In Number 1-877-842-7884

Dana is on the air


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2006, 08:40:02 PM
What does a waterboard or a tsunami have to do with the Masons?  The initial FP post confused me but now I am really lost.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 01, 2006, 08:40:16 PM
Im on the air now if any of you want to call in before i start the interviews.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 08:40:50 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What does a waterboard or a tsunami have to do with the Masons?  The initial FP post confused me but now I am really lost.


Nothing.... my family are Masons and all I can say is PUH LEZE....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 08:41:42 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.



Some defense of this kind of behavior offered on Front Page by the Dutch but this has to be the dirtiest and lowest thing ever called a law or legal procedure.

This judge can sign a search warrant and appear to the whole world to be granting one as would be required in this situation.  Then he can sneak out to the actual site and cancel, modify it or restrict it as was done in this case.  This way the judge gets to appear to be doing the right thing when in fact, he isn't.

What a crock!!

 :evil:

And good for O'Reilley for having the sense to see this instead of defending this disgusting practice.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 08:41:43 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Im on the air now if any of you want to call in before i start the interviews.


Hi Dana... I am very excited about the Jacquie Hollander interview.... that case is SOOOOOOOOOOOO important!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:42:21 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What does a waterboard or a tsunami have to do with the Masons?  The initial FP post confused me but now I am really lost.


Nothing.... my family are Masons and all I can say is PUH LEZE....


Can you say, red herring, misdirection, beating a dead horse?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2006, 08:42:37 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What does a waterboard or a tsunami have to do with the Masons?  The initial FP post confused me but now I am really lost.


Nothing.... my family are Masons and all I can say is PUH LEZE....


I don't know a thing about the Masons except for the much earlier discussions.  I just didn't understand the concern related to that post.  I don't see a connection.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:45:08 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?


What's a "face map"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 08:47:04 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?



I sure do mrs. red.... :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:48:11 PM
There IS a "Brotherhood" among the men in Aruba
We have the Lion's Club and the Mason's Club (men's groups)

Any affiliation with the "Lion's Den"?
What goes on there?

Joran passes this location on his way home from the hotels....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 01, 2006, 08:48:43 PM
For the first several months of Nat's disappearnce, I was quite gullible. I never dreamt that there would actually be people posting that would purposely try to misdirect and distract from the truth (other than the suspects). When I look back, I think about how stupid it was to believe that these posters were sincere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 08:48:48 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
What does a waterboard or a tsunami have to do with the Masons?  The initial FP post confused me but now I am really lost.


Nothing.... my family are Masons and all I can say is PUH LEZE....


I don't know a thing about the Masons except for the much earlier discussions.  I just didn't understand the concern related to that post.  I don't see a connection.


Some people  - not here... are trying to intimiate that it's connected to the Masons.... that's all I was saying...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 08:49:05 PM
DANA - We created a thread with questions for Jossy
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=602


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:50:26 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
For the first several months of Nat's disappearnce, I was quite gullible. I never dreamt that there would actually be people posting that would purposely try to misdirect and distract from the truth (other than the suspects). When I look back, I think about how stupid it was to believe that these posters were sincere.


Me, too....

SandraK
Reality
MIP6
Glenda
etc.............................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 08:50:27 PM
BT, the only place I ever heard anything about possible Mason involvement was from Kath...right before she left way back when...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 08:51:18 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
BT, the only place I ever heard anything about possible Mason involvement was from Kath...right before she left way back when...


Please elaborate.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 01, 2006, 08:51:28 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


But Greta is still inclined to believe him.

Does not get much more blatant that changing a search warrant to steer people in the direction you want to.

Anyone want to come up with any reason why a search warrant should ever be changed?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2006, 08:52:44 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "mishy"
BT, the only place I ever heard anything about possible Mason involvement was from Kath...right before she left way back when...


Please elaborate.....


That discussion got messy last time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 08:52:50 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "mishy"
BT, the only place I ever heard anything about possible Mason involvement was from Kath...right before she left way back when...


Please elaborate.....


I'll need some help on this b/c that's actually all I remember. IIRC, she was intimating that there was some Masonic involvement, but everybody poo-pooed that idea immediately...That's all I know about that...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2006, 08:53:34 PM
Then why repeat something that probably isn't true?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 08:53:51 PM
Joe Bad Mamajama's attorney sez: Hold your horses!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 08:54:03 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?



I sure do mrs. red.... :twisted:


Cubbee, I am glad that someone else saw it.... I was shocked...

Florida, you need to go to the Dana archived shows and listen to the woman who does face mapping... but I was shocked to see that Scott Peterson and Joran... it's the same  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2006, 08:54:38 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


But Greta is still inclined to believe him.

Does not get much more blatant that changing a search warrant to steer people in the direction you want to.

Anyone want to come up with any reason why a search warrant should ever be changed?


Lost the poker hand??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 01, 2006, 08:55:08 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


But Greta is still inclined to believe him.

Does not get much more blatant that changing a search warrant to steer people in the direction you want to.

Anyone want to come up with any reason why a search warrant should ever be changed?


When the judge who approved the search had been involved in the crime that was being investigated?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 08:55:30 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Then why repeat something that probably isn't true?


I don't know, my fluffy muffybee...I don't know why some people think there is a correlation...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 08:56:12 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


But Greta is still inclined to believe him.

Does not get much more blatant that changing a search warrant to steer people in the direction you want to.

Anyone want to come up with any reason why a search warrant should ever be changed?


Dunno, always amazed me, actually I can't believe that PVDS would have anything on his property that he would be worried about, especially after the time to cleanup any possible traces in the first place.

Such a flaqrant disregard for the rules, wonder if they did it just because they could do it.

Either that or everyone knows theres something there that needs to be covered for.

Kinda like PVDS driving himself to the police for his arrest rather than being taken in by the police.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 08:57:27 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


But Greta is still inclined to believe him.

Does not get much more blatant that changing a search warrant to steer people in the direction you want to.

Anyone want to come up with any reason why a search warrant should ever be changed?



How about when a judge wants to hide his dirty he is by pretending publicly to grant the search warrant then sneaking around and changing it on the spot?

After he signed it!  Why else pretend to grant it in the first place if not trying to give the appearance of something that is not true.

In this country, I believe KJ could have had those persons blocking the search arrested as well it should be done.


So we have established that the prosecution was acting in collusion with the suspect Sloot and now it would also appear the judges are as well.  No real surprise but this is too obvious!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2006, 08:58:37 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Then why repeat something that probably isn't true?


I don't know, my fluffy muffybee...I don't know why some people think there is a correlation...


There could be a possibility somehow, somewhere that a man that belonged to the Mason's could be involved.  Who knows?  There are a lot of them around.  But that doesn't mean it was THE Mason's.  There are good and bad in many organizations, including churches etc.  

So I hope we can give the Masonic thing a rest.  Go after the person that might be a Mason.  Whatever


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 01, 2006, 08:59:37 PM
I am getting a headache about this thing.  I think it's more stuff just to add to throwing off the scent of the real things.  Goodnight


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:00:41 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
O'Reily: The key to whole thing is that the search warrant to search the entire property was changed ON THE SPOT.

He's smarter than I thought.


But Greta is still inclined to believe him.

Does not get much more blatant that changing a search warrant to steer people in the direction you want to.

Anyone want to come up with any reason why a search warrant should ever be changed?


Without due process? No.
Even with due process, I can only imagine a reason to EXPAND, not NARROW a search warrant.

Even if there was a confession to the crime being investigated by a party unrelated to the search, you STILL complete the search timely just in case the confessor was a "wannabe".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 01, 2006, 09:01:19 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeyfaces....


I'm having trouble keeping up!  Don't mind me though, I love all the intelligent conversation.  I just feell askeep at my desk.  See y'alll tomorrow!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:02:14 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
I am getting a headache about this thing.  I think it's more stuff just to add to throwing off the scent of the real things.  Goodnight


I am not going to say anything about it...because I agree with you. I am  glad to see you back in the US... and when life settles down a bit I hope I can ask you a zillion quesitions in the lounge about living in the Middle East...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 01, 2006, 09:02:45 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
BT, the only place I ever heard anything about possible Mason involvement was from Kath...right before she left way back when...


Well, I don't think there is any Masonic involvement, but that seems to be what Parascope is trying to say on the front page. There are a whole bunch of cryptic posts, but the implication of Masonic involvement seems pretty obvious to me. I've been trying to figure out what the posts mean, and it's been kind of fun. It all has to do with Goetia and levels of spirits and all sorts of things. I got stuck on the post about the greyhounds, though. Can't figure that one out at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 09:02:57 PM
Any word on what O'Reilly and Geraldo said about the case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:04:44 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?



I sure do mrs. red.... :twisted:


Cubbee, I am glad that someone else saw it.... I was shocked...

Florida, you need to go to the Dana archived shows and listen to the woman who does face mapping... but I was shocked to see that Scott Peterson and Joran... it's the same  :twisted:


Sorry, can you give me a link to Dana's show right now.....

About SP.....I've never heard of face mapping.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 01, 2006, 09:05:38 PM
Call in with your questions for Jossy ... make yourself heard ...

There are so many questions to ask


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:07:13 PM
I've been gone too long....................I can't seem to find Dana.  :(

Help?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 09:07:17 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?



I sure do mrs. red.... :twisted:


Cubbee, I am glad that someone else saw it.... I was shocked...

Florida, you need to go to the Dana archived shows and listen to the woman who does face mapping... but I was shocked to see that Scott Peterson and Joran... it's the same  :twisted:




It is really eerie , isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:07:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA PRETZER - 9PM EASTERN

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/12/01/dana-pretzer-show-special-guests-atty-michael-winston-jossy-mansur-jacque-hollander/

Call In Number 1-877-842-7884


Link to the show


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 01, 2006, 09:09:56 PM
I think I remember how the Mason's came up....

I remember when some Dutch posters (and don't ask me who, cause I am still trying to figure out who Robots is...) mentioned that Paulus belinged to a secret mens group who were very secretive and powerful..

I do believe it was yours truly who said to him, Oh a club like the MASONS?

Never intending to create any kind of connection that the Masons had ANYTHING whatsoever to do with this, but that was the only group I could come up with that sounded sort of like what this dutch poster was talking about.

I got flamed for mentioning Masons, and apologized profusely stating I was just using them as an example of a club.

So I am pretty sure that the rumors just started flying, after a very innocent post by me, with no harm intended...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:10:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA PRETZER - 9PM EASTERN

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/12/01/dana-pretzer-show-special-guests-atty-michael-winston-jossy-mansur-jacque-hollander/

Call In Number 1-877-842-7884


Link to the show


Just got it, Klaas.............THANK YOU!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:10:59 PM
When is it ok to call?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:11:15 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
When is it ok to call?


RIGHT NOW!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 09:11:56 PM
My fifteen year old is in here and he says that he feels sorry for us if we use to listen to that kind of music.... :roll:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:11:57 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
When is it ok to call?



Yes, ma am!

I called so much while you were gone even Red recognizes my voice!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:12:54 PM
Thanks, Klaas...but, the link doesn't work for me.....

There are "good Mason's" & "bad Masons"......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:13:09 PM
CBB,
Call any time Dana is not actually talking to the guests.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:13:58 PM
Done.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:14:29 PM
Judge Witt signed the original and was also the one on the scene, sneaking around limiting it to Joran's digs, the place they had all cleaned up already.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:14:41 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Thanks, Klaas...but, the link doesn't work for me.....

There are "good Mason's" & "bad Masons"......


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio/

Click on the link on the RIGHT where it says LISTEN LIVE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 09:15:12 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
My fifteen year old is in here and he says that he feels sorry for us if we use to listen to that kind of music.... :roll:  :wink:


LOLOLOL Cubbee  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:15:19 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Done.  :wink:

Was that you CBB?  You were GREAT!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:15:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Judge Witt signed the original and was also the one on the scene, sneaking around limiting it to Joran's digs, the place they had all cleaned up already.


Didn't know that, Anna. But the question remains: how could that be done without the due process that produced the original.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:16:09 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?



I sure do mrs. red.... :twisted:


Cubbee, I am glad that someone else saw it.... I was shocked...

Florida, you need to go to the Dana archived shows and listen to the woman who does face mapping... but I was shocked to see that Scott Peterson and Joran... it's the same  :twisted:


Sorry, can you give me a link to Dana's show right now.....

About SP.....I've never heard of face mapping.


If you go to the front page, the link is there... just open another internet window.... the face mapping is hard to explain that is why I am saying listen to the lady from Dana's show..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:16:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Done.  :wink:

Was that you CBB?  You were GREAT!


I don't know about great, but yeah, me. Thx.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 01, 2006, 09:17:43 PM
GOOD SONG!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:18:57 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I think I remember how the Mason's came up....

I remember when some Dutch posters (and don't ask me who, cause I am still trying to figure out who Robots is...) mentioned that Paulus belinged to a secret mens group who were very secretive and powerful..

I do believe it was yours truly who said to him, Oh a club like the MASONS?

Never intending to create any kind of connection that the Masons had ANYTHING whatsoever to do with this, but that was the only group I could come up with that sounded sort of like what this dutch poster was talking about.

I got flamed for mentioning Masons, and apologized profusely stating I was just using them as an example of a club.

So I am pretty sure that the rumors just started flying, after a very innocent post by me, with no harm intended...


No honey it wasn't you... it was someone else. :wink:   Doesn't bear talking about ... I am just hoping that we can see Jaquie Hollander get some justice and it is a tie in with this case, because as of right now, women have two years to file in a rape case, her case could change that ... it's a huge step forward for women... HUGE...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 09:19:37 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Done.  :wink:

Was that you CBB?  You were GREAT!


I don't know about great, but yeah, me. Thx.


Hey CBB, you did sound great! Nice to see ya here  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:20:28 PM
If nothing else, wouldn't you think that the fact that a judge who was friendly enough with the Sloots to be there IN SUPPORT of the family during this "difficult" time, having ANY authority to impact a search warrant involving their son, would be an inpropriety???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:20:48 PM
Cubbee... it's dang near identical...maybe we have a way to recongize predators ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:20:52 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
wow... do y'all see the same "face map" like I do?



I sure do mrs. red.... :twisted:


Cubbee, I am glad that someone else saw it.... I was shocked...

Florida, you need to go to the Dana archived shows and listen to the woman who does face mapping... but I was shocked to see that Scott Peterson and Joran... it's the same  :twisted:


Sorry, can you give me a link to Dana's show right now.....

About SP.....I've never heard of face mapping.


If you go to the front page, the link is there... just open another internet window.... the face mapping is hard to explain that is why I am saying listen to the lady from Dana's show..


Certain eyes, forehead, smile?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:21:21 PM
DANA:   Was the search warrent changed on the spot?

JOSSY:  The search warrent was changed.  When they went to the house the first time Ben Vocking was there, employee of the department of prosecution.  Vocking had no business being there and used his influence to change the search warrent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:21:30 PM
Close friends shouldn't have had authority in any capacity in this case!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:22:05 PM
Florida  that's kind of it... also the left to right sides... look at scott peterson and joran's  faces... they have the same characteristics..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 09:22:19 PM
Jossy  !   You rock !  Jossy has a video !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:22:38 PM
JOSSY - I agree with O'Reilly, the government doesn't want to solve the case.

They have sufficient evidence to prosecute them on kidnapping and rape.  Why doesn't KJ do that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 01, 2006, 09:23:02 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Close friends shouldn't have had authority in any capacity in this case!!!!


I agree completely. It would be a conflict of interest, among other things...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:23:16 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Anna"
Judge Witt signed the original and was also the one on the scene, sneaking around limiting it to Joran's digs, the place they had all cleaned up already.


Didn't know that, Anna. But the question remains: how could that be done without the due process that produced the original.



Oh, you are right and not sure deVries covered WHO signed the original.  Monkeys answered that for me in here.

No due process at all  :(   And KJ is supposed ot have said at one point that Paulus wouldn't let them search, too.  

You sounded so good, just as I remembered you!   :D Did a great job.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 01, 2006, 09:23:48 PM
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:24:03 PM
JOSSY:  Court appearance yesterday.  Judge H. Smit again.  Decision should come down by next week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:24:23 PM
Our judges and officers of the court recuse themselves when they are presented with responsibilities involving aquaintances.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 09:26:09 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Our judges and officers of the court recuse themselves when they are presented with responsibilities involving aquaintances.


Apparently aruba dosen't have that particular nicety.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:26:11 PM
Didn't DeVries also say that Joran said that Natalee had been in his parent's home?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:26:41 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Our judges and officers of the court recuse themselves when they are presented with responsibilities involving aquaintances.


it's true, except in that crazy case that Crazy Mom has posted about in the Crimes Against Children Thread... that case is horrific as well...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:26:43 PM
Somebody ask Jossy about the photo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:27:54 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Our judges and officers of the court recuse themselves when they are presented with responsibilities involving aquaintances.


Exactly!  And they don't sneak around and change their orders either.

Witt pretended in public to grant the search then cancelled it when he thought the media wasn't looking.

My neighbor recused himself from a court case involving us because he was a neighbor even though we did not really know each other.  He avoided the APPEARANCE of wrong doing as well.

Apparently they have no conflict of interest regulations in Aruba at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:28:04 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Florida  that's kind of it... also the left to right sides... look at scott peterson and joran's  faces... they have the same characteristics..


Is it "When they are looking at you; but, one eye is askewed?

I submitted a couple of questions for Jossy....
Unfortunately, I have no access to Dana's program.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:30:02 PM
DANA:  Are you aware of de Vries doing a followup?

JOSSY:  Yes, I think he will be doing a followup.

DANA:  Is it true that Joran had more than a platonic relationship with Guido.

JOSSY:  Yes, there is a statement to that affect.  I think it's in Guido's statement.

JOSSY:  There is that possibility that Guido is involved.

JOSSY:  I have a video tape of Gerald Dompig that they do have sufficient material to bring these boys in on kidnapping and rape.  Which would be 8 years imprisonment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:30:14 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.


Believe me...This is true....."THe BROTHERHOOD"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:31:10 PM
FLORIDA - what happens when you try to access the radio program?  Are you clicking on the link that says LISTEN LIVE?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:32:21 PM
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 09:33:09 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.

Masons are not criminals. Keep it specific to the person, please .
The are usually fine upstanding altruistic citizens.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 09:33:35 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.

Masons are not criminals. Keep it specific to the person, please .
The are usually fine upstanding altruistic citizens.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:33:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
FLORIDA - what happens when you try to access the radio program?  Are you clicking on the link that says LISTEN LIVE?


Yes, and I save it as a document...& nothing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:33:50 PM
So according to Jossy, it's in Guido's statement where Guido admits to a more than platonic relationship with Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 01, 2006, 09:34:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.


The rats are leaving the sinking ship


(http://i1.tinypic.com/ofspzq.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 09:34:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.


So how does that jive with KJ's slide show and saying she need 3 more months to bring the case to trial?

Guess she's gonna let someone else finish it up then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 09:34:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
So according to Jossy, it's in Guido's statement where Guido admits to a more than platonic relationship with Joran.




Yup....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:34:43 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
FLORIDA - what happens when you try to access the radio program?  Are you clicking on the link that says LISTEN LIVE?


Yes, and I save it as a document...& nothing.


You don't want to save it as a document.  Just right mouse click on it and open in a new window.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 09:34:44 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.


Believe me...This is true....."THe BROTHERHOOD"

Oh, you know nothing about Masons.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 01, 2006, 09:35:13 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
FLORIDA - what happens when you try to access the radio program?  Are you clicking on the link that says LISTEN LIVE?


Yes, and I save it as a document...& nothing.


Don't right click it..double left click it .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 09:35:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.



She be getting out of Dodge fer sure.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:35:42 PM
I THINK in Aruba, Mason's means something different.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 01, 2006, 09:36:38 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.


Believe me...This is true....."THe BROTHERHOOD"


I do believe you.  It is disgusting & any organization worth joining would have an oath to stand by & counsel a fellow member to do the right thing rather than accept a cowardly miserable excuse to the human race & their dastardly deeds of the Devil.  I hope they all rot in hell & they can't get there soon enough for me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 09:36:40 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.


The rats are leaving the sinking ship


(http://i1.tinypic.com/ofspzq.jpg)





 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 09:37:33 PM
Let's not start having this argument about the MASON'S or LION'S CLUB again.

The MASON'S and LION'S CLUB are both fine organizations.  It's possible in Aruba there is a different type of club that is not so "fine".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:38:57 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Florida  that's kind of it... also the left to right sides... look at scott peterson and joran's  faces... they have the same characteristics..


Is it "When they are looking at you; but, one eye is askewed?

I submitted a couple of questions for Jossy....
Unfortunately, I have no access to Dana's program.


Oh Florida, I am the worst to explain.... maybe a smarter monkey can make it make more sense..but you are getting the general idea...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 09:40:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Let's not start having this argument about the MASON'S or LION'S CLUB again.

The MASON'S and LION'S CLUB are both fine organizations.  It's possible in Aruba there is a different type of club that is not so "fine".



klaas, I would put money on that last sentence.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:40:38 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
I THINK in Aruba, Mason's means something different.
Well, then it really isn't masons, is it?

Throughout history there have been groups or organizations that vow to watch each others backs, etc.

There is nothing to connect any such organization with this disappearance.  From time to time we have someone try to lead us down that path.   Last time it was the Lions Club, next time may be the PTA but the facts do not bear out any such connection.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 09:42:07 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
I THINK in Aruba, Mason's means something different.

My family members were Masons. Sure they have some odd ball ideas, but they are not a sinister organization. I've been in the big Masonic temple here. Met them. My daughter was married in their  temple.
Of course, when I asked some questions about the stuff in the showcases from the 1700's, they would not tell me. They have alot of odd rituals at their funerals aslo, but they are Christian (Protestant ) people.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:44:03 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.



She be getting out of Dodge fer sure.....


And a whole compliment of new judges being processed in as well.
Van der Straaten left, Guido left, manager at the HI left, Gottenbros left,    and even Joran left.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:44:34 PM
So....More inference OFF of Joran and on GUIDO?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:46:33 PM
OMG... this poor woman... she is BRAVE!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:46:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Florida  that's kind of it... also the left to right sides... look at scott peterson and joran's  faces... they have the same characteristics..


Is it "When they are looking at you; but, one eye is askewed?

I submitted a couple of questions for Jossy....
Unfortunately, I have no access to Dana's program.


Oh Florida, I am the worst to explain.... maybe a smarter monkey can make it make more sense..but you are getting the general idea...



Too complicated to explain in a forum post.  You need to go to Dana's website and listen to the discussion by the lady who does this.  You can listen to the podcast of any of his programs at any time.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 09:47:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
So according to Jossy, it's in Guido's statement where Guido admits to a more than platonic relationship with Joran.
Thanks for typing what Jossy said! I cannot access the live radio, I think my firewall or AOL maybe somehow blocking me?waaaaaaaaaa.. I will try to figure it out by the next show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:48:44 PM
She just said ScaredMonkeys.com!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 09:49:20 PM
Here is where this logic is taking you. If the person or persons responsible was a Catholic, would that mean that the Cathoilc Church and the Pope was behind it?
What if it was a member of the Church of England, would the head of the that Church be behind it ?
Silly stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007.



She be getting out of Dodge fer sure.....


And a whole compliment of new judges being processed in as well.
Van der Straaten left, Guido left, manager at the HI left, Gottenbros left,    and even Joran left.

.
I guess they figure if anyone involved in the case leaves we will forget about it, and this will all just go away...NOT!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:49:56 PM
Y'all have to remember that you can listen to Dana later... download the podcast...


I am so behind this woman and her case... I don't think that rape should carry a two year statute of limitations... it's just not right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:50:15 PM
Well!  That was a surprise.  I think we need a place for them to post should these rape victims come here as she suggested?  It might be hard to find that article on the Front Page as it will continue to move down.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:51:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Well!  That was a surprise.  I think we need a place for them to post should these rape victims come here as she suggested?  It might be hard to find that article on the Front Page as it will continue to move down.

Well we will be definately be following that case... I am praying that the SCt takes the case.... that is HUGE... I know I am repeating myself about this but it's just so very important...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:52:13 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.


Believe me...This is true....."THe BROTHERHOOD"

Oh, you know nothing about Masons.


True....I know nothing about MASON'S

But, I do know about MASON's in Aruba.
It's NOT what you think.......................................

The "Secrecy/The Brotherhood"..........................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:53:49 PM
Ok..can we agree that the Masons in aruba may not be the same group at all as here... and let this one go?  I am getting a headache from this ...


and jossy said so many things that I would have thought y'all would be all over that...

ANNA... you sounded great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:54:32 PM
did y'all just hear me yell up to Red... "ANNA"? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 09:54:59 PM
I agree.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 09:55:01 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Anna"
Well!  That was a surprise.  I think we need a place for them to post should these rape victims come here as she suggested?  It might be hard to find that article on the Front Page as it will continue to move down.

Well we will be definately be following that case... I am praying that the SCt takes the case.... that is HUGE... I know I am repeating myself about this but it's just so very important...
Yes it is!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:55:36 PM
Yeah! Like the video. Why the heck aren't they in jail for the eight year sentence for rape/kidnapping while they work on the murder charge???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:55:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
did y'all just hear me yell up to Red... "ANNA"? :shock:



LOL!!!   :D No, you can tell, too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 09:56:20 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Masons

I furthermore promise and swear, that I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.

Comment by Allan K | December 1, 2006, 8:37 pm


This post from the front page is interesting.  It's at least in plain english.


Believe me...This is true....."THe BROTHERHOOD"

Oh, you know nothing about Masons.


True....I know nothing about MASON'S

But, I do know about MASON's in Aruba.
It's NOT what you think.......................................

The "Secrecy/The Brotherhood"..........................


The problem in aruba is the White Dutch, not whatever fraternal orders or clubs they may belong to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:56:28 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Yeah! Like the video. Why the heck aren't they in jail for the eight year sentence for rape/kidnapping while they work on the murder charge???


Right?  that's just unbelievalbe... and Jossy just confirmed so much of what we have discussed...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Yeah! Like the video. Why the heck aren't they in jail for the eight year sentence for rape/kidnapping while they work on the murder charge???



Paulus won't let them???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 09:57:10 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
did y'all just hear me yell up to Red... "ANNA"? :shock:



LOL!!!   :D No, you can tell, too.

I love to hear you talk... you and CBB... makes me homesick.. but I love hearing y'all...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 09:58:53 PM
Maybe we need to tell Peter deVries that Jossy has this tape???   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 09:59:25 PM
I was a little surprised that Jossy hadn't seen the photo, and that he didn't know who had signed the original warrant ( he should ask Anna,  :wink: ), but I think it is as alarming to Holland as it is to us that the warrant was changed on the premises by a friend of the family!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:00:00 PM
Capitalist is not a dirty word to some of us.   :wink:

It's what makes the world go round. . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:00:38 PM
I wonder how many people in Aruba are pissed off at Jossy for "speaking out?!" Go Jossy Go !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 10:01:06 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
did y'all just hear me yell up to Red... "ANNA"? :shock:



LOL!!!   :D No, you can tell, too.

I love to hear you talk... you and CBB... makes me homesick.. but I love hearing y'all...


Uh-Huh..............did you hear the Southern pronunciation of DeVries?
I said De Vries to rhyme with fries.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 10:03:17 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
did y'all just hear me yell up to Red... "ANNA"? :shock:



LOL!!!   :D No, you can tell, too.

I love to hear you talk... you and CBB... makes me homesick.. but I love hearing y'all...


Uh-Huh..............did you hear the Southern pronunciation of DeVries?
I said De Vries to rhyme with fries.  :oops:


I love, love it... when I call my family don't think my "roots" come out.... I hung up the phone today after checking with the hospital and my boss told me to drop the fake accent....  :shock:   I love SOuthern accents... and I love NY accents to... and Dana's accent... the "about"...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 01, 2006, 10:04:24 PM
Going to go do some more shopping, may catch up with y'all later.
If not y'all have a good evening.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:05:25 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I was a little surprised that Jossy hadn't seen the photo, and that he didn't know who had signed the original warrant ( he should ask Anna,  :wink: ), but I think it is as alarming to Holland as it is to us that the warrant was changed on the premises by a friend of the family!


Well, Rammstein is on the Front Page defending it as a lawful act under the powers granted to judges.  You'd think these judges were not even human beings but Saints or Angels to hear him talk about all their integrity and their high standards.

They are merely human beings subject to all the same motives and corruption as any other human beings.

I couldn't keep a straight face saying all that crap he does about them when we have this obvious example of short-circuiting the very premise on which law is based, due process.

Certainly, not all are equal under the law in Aruba for imagine someone like the security guards asking the judge to come out and change the warrant on the site!  He would probably end up in jail for even thinking it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 10:05:37 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Going to go do some more shopping, may catch up with y'all later.
If not y'all have a good evening.....


Nite Cubbee...

and you gave me a good reason to say if you are using Amazon, use the SM button at the bottom of the page or on the front page....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 10:06:17 PM
LOL! Oh Mrs. Red, that reminds me so much of Mom! She pronounced "about" sorta like "aboot". She was from Southern Virginia. My sister's name is Patty, and it came out almost like "Potty".  :lol:  The narrator on the "Walton's" had her accent exactly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:08:53 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
[Uh-Huh..............did you hear the Southern pronunciation of DeVries?
I said De Vries to rhyme with fries.  :oops:


That is the only way I have ever heard it pronounced, too, CBB.  There is even that commercial on TV for years for some computer school DeVrys University or something like that.  Rhymes with fries.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 01, 2006, 10:08:56 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
LOL! Oh Mrs. Red, that reminds me so much of Mom! She pronounced "about" sorta like "aboot". She was from Southern Virginia. My sister's name is Patty, and it came out almost like "Potty".  :lol:  The narrator on the "Walton's" had her accent exactly.


too funny... the Waltons... I was fascinated by that show...

Monkeys... it has felt good to be in and talk to y'all.  There is so much information being stirred... we may just yet get a resolution.... or see justice....


DANA.. excellent show... what interesting guests!!!

Keep the Faith MONKEYS...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 01, 2006, 10:10:16 PM
de Vries rhymes with duh freeze


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:10:18 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
So....More inference OFF of Joran and on GUIDO?

No, how do you figure that?  It's just that it's entirely possible that Guido gave Joran a ride home and was involved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:11:58 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
de Vries rhymes with duh freeze



Not around here, Leslie.  I hope I can remember to say it that way if I ever call in about that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:13:56 PM
.
Reminds me of

That's FRANKENSTEEN!


 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 01, 2006, 10:19:10 PM
Hope everyone enjoyed the show tonight, im pretty sure we had a couple of never heard before statements
Im uploading the show to the server tom will have it available soon.

Dana


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:19:53 PM
.
So we have Hammer's perjury, conspiracy to commit purjury, obstruction of justice and Jossy's tape of kidnapping and sexual assault and yet there is no evidence???

Go figure. . . .Oh, that;s right, no "hard" evidence as in forensic but could that be because the judge sneaked and changed the search warrant on the site?  And that ALE and KJ refused to collect any from those last seen with Natalee?

But still, why haven't any of these charges at least been mentioned?  

Is there hope for a new and better replacement for KJ?  Dare I hope??



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:25:40 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/ssaruba1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:26:25 PM
Great Show, Dana.

We need to get the photoshopped photo information to Jossy!

And Jossy has a tape!  And it is Guido who tells of the relationship with Joran.

Yes, new information and also confirmation of several rumors we have heard.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 01, 2006, 10:26:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/ssaruba1.jpg)


lol and accurate


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 01, 2006, 10:28:08 PM
Special thanks to Jossy for dropping a couple of bombshells tonight.

1) KJ leaving ... getting out of Dodge. Are any of the original usual suspects still in Aruba?

2) So Jossy has a tape of Dompig making some comments about the case. Wonder what else the tape has on it? ;)   :roll:
Was wondering when this was going to be said, glad Jossy used SM to get it out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:28:48 PM
Dana - great show!  I had to reboot my PC durring your last interview so I'll have to download the podcast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:29:00 PM
Soon there won't be anybody connected to this investigation left on the island!  

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Maybe the Kalpoes and the rest will fly the coop!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:29:27 PM
1. joran did not walk home - feet would have been cut up plus he is a baby and would not do that


2. he didnt get a ride home with k2.. joran was implicating them or was attemting to implicate


where does that leave us...


GUIDO BABY !!!!!!

GUIDO gettin skkeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeered

GUIDO, come sleep with momma but stop the LIES  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 01, 2006, 10:30:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Dana - great show!  I had to reboot my PC durring your last interview so I'll have to download the podcast.

acually all three interviews tonight are important, cases that have signifigant consequences for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:30:58 PM
GUIDO GUIDO GUIDO

alli want to do is BANG on your HEAD ALL DAY  8)  8)  8)  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:31:56 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Special thanks to Jossy for dropping a couple of bombshells tonight.

1) KJ leaving ... getting out of Dodge. Are any of the original usual suspects still in Aruba?

2) So Jossy has a tape of Dompig making some comments about the case. Wonder what else the tape has on it? ;)   :roll:
Was wondering when this was going to be said, glad Jossy used SM to get it out.



Red,
Could you send Jossy all the information on the Photoshopped picture?  Maybe your article from the Front Page plus the second more sickening photo?

I don't have his email address except for the one at the paper and suspect he doesn't read there that much.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:33:13 PM
sneakers disappeared cause JORAN's shoe prints were in GUIDO'S car

shoe prints had forensics

but no reason for TOILET POLICE to check guido's car  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:34:42 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Hope everyone enjoyed the show tonight, im pretty sure we had a couple of never heard before statements
Im uploading the show to the server tom will have it available soon.

Dana
Thanks Dana...I will have to download it and listen to it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:34:43 PM
sneakers went with GUIDO somewhere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:35:36 PM
guido buried the sneakers and used his 4 wheeler, took em way out and buried em  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:37:35 PM
Quote from: "robots"
guido buried the sneakers and used his 4 wheeler, took em way out and buried em  8)

Very possible


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 10:37:56 PM
Did we ever get to the bottom of why Antonio Carlo who was hired as Joran's lawyer on Thursday June 2, 2005 ( according to Deepak's statement ) had ANY contact with either one of the security guards.
The guards were not brought into custody until June 5 th.
Carlo was not a criminal attorney, so I doubt that he was in the pool of available lawyers for indigent  ( legal aid )  detainees in criminal cases.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:37:59 PM
Quote from: "robots"
guido buried the sneakers and used his 4 wheeler, took em way out and buried em  8)


Well, just give them 12-14 months and ALE will jump right on investigating that!

 :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:38:30 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Special thanks to Jossy for dropping a couple of bombshells tonight.

1) KJ leaving ... getting out of Dodge. Are any of the original usual suspects still in Aruba?

2) So Jossy has a tape of Dompig making some comments about the case. Wonder what else the tape has on it? ;)   :roll:
Was wondering when this was going to be said, glad Jossy used SM to get it out.
Jossy also confirmed that Guido admits to "more than freinds" with Joran, in a statement Guido gave in Court.....I would bet that Joran is getting upset, right about now!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:39:02 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranGudoDrag.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranRun2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:39:17 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Did we ever get to the bottom of why Antonio Carlo who was hired as Joran's lawyer on Thursday June 2, 2005 ( according to Deepak's statement ) had ANY contact with either one of the security guards.
The guards were not brought into custody until June 5 th.
Carlo was not a criminal attorney, so I doubt that he was in the pool of available lawyers for indigent  ( legal aid )  detainees in criminal cases.



To offer them a bribe to take the fall?  Just guessing.. . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:39:31 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
guido buried the sneakers and used his 4 wheeler, took em way out and buried em  8)


Well, just give them 12-14 months and ALE will jump right on investigating that!

 :?




yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:40:18 PM
i think guido told ALE some stuff
and i dont think ALE has let on what they were told

bye bye joran

 8)  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:41:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranGudoDrag.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranRun2.gif)


i dont mind telling you

that PICTURE freaks me out  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:41:28 PM
I can just hear Joran now...."Mommy, Daddy, they are saying I am bi-sexual, help me, help me"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 10:41:52 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i think guido told ALE some stuff
and i dont think ALE has let on what they were told

bye bye joran

 8)  8)



I wonder also if JORAN.ANGRY! because Guido told about their special relationship.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 01, 2006, 10:43:03 PM
OK Klaas I hope you are happy ... after looking at the Joran/Guido pic I am blind.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:43:22 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
i think guido told ALE some stuff
and i dont think ALE has let on what they were told

bye bye joran

 8)  8)



I wonder also if JORAN.ANGRY! because Guido told about their special relationship.


.


thats what i think and also because ol joran knows CERTAIN people
can screw him into the ground and that has got to GRETA...err ahhh...
i mean GRATE

 on you nerves


 8)  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:44:05 PM
Quote from: "Red"
OK Klaas I hope you are happy ... after looking at the Joran/Guido pic I am blind.  :shock:


that thing is still freaking me out


the RED EYES

he is DIABLO  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:44:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranGudoDrag.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranRun2.gif)
ROFL !  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:46:09 PM
Quote from: "Red"
OK Klaas I hope you are happy ... after looking at the Joran/Guido pic I am blind.  :shock:
Yeah, and it probably wasn't even Holloween! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:47:42 PM
How about this one?  His disguise so he could get out of New York??  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/geishajoran2-1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:50:14 PM
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 10:51:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
How about this one?  His disguise so he could get out of New York??  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/geishajoran2-1.jpg)
LMAO! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 01, 2006, 10:52:39 PM
Hey......What happpened to the "ideas" I submitted to DANA......???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 10:53:38 PM
OMG! ROLLING!!!

Stop it, Klaas! My stomach muscles can't take it, I HURT!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:54:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


YES


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 01, 2006, 10:55:20 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
PSYCHOPATHS

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/joranvds-1.jpg)
"Sporter""

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/scott_peterson.jpg)
Scooter"

A psychopath is defined as having no concern for the feelings of others and a complete disregard for any sense of social obligation. They seem egocentric and lack insight and any sense of responsibility or consequence. Their emotions are thought to be superficial and shallow, if they exist at all. They are considered callous, manipulative, and incapable of forming lasting relationships, let alone of any kind of love. It is thought that any emotions which the true psychopath exhibits are the fruits of watching and mimicking other people's emotions. They show poor impulse control and a low tolerance for frustration and aggression. They have no empathy, remorse, anxiety or guilt in relation to their behavior. In short, they truly are devoid of conscience.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy#What_is_a_psychopath.3F

Perfectly put. This one I'll keep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 10:55:33 PM
OK, help me remember this, k?

Guido and Joran were supposed to have a tennis date the day after Nat went missing............is that right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:56:46 PM
simple for an investigator to check the time sheets at his employer

but like Anna said give TOILET L.E. 12-14 months and they might get to it :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:57:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


 
Natalee Holloway's Mother 'Guardedly Optimistic' About New Arrest

Monday , May 22, 2006

 

 
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  — The mother of missing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is "guardedly optimistic" about the Dutch arrest last week of a new suspect in connection with their daughter's disappearance.

"An arrest is better than no arrest, so hopefully it will bring about something," said Beth Holloway Twitty, mentioning how there have been many supects and arrests but few answers.

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:57:49 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK, help me remember this, k?

Guido and Joran were supposed to have a tennis date the day after Nat went missing............is that right?


well, they did have a DATE  8)
but we are not sure if Tennis was on the agenda  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 10:57:58 PM
If memory serves me, no one saw them playing, and I remember thinking they were probably disposing of Natalee.

I THINK this came up when Guido was questioned.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 01, 2006, 10:58:28 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Did we ever get to the bottom of why Antonio Carlo who was hired as Joran's lawyer on Thursday June 2, 2005 ( according to Deepak's statement ) had ANY contact with either one of the security guards.
The guards were not brought into custody until June 5 th.
Carlo was not a criminal attorney, so I doubt that he was in the pool of available lawyers for indigent  ( legal aid )  detainees in criminal cases.



To offer them a bribe to take the fall?  Just guessing.. . . . .


My instinct is that this is unlikely, but I am not a supreme being, so that makes me likely to be wrong.  It does make one wonder what he was thinking or acting on at the time he supposedly contacted one of the SGs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:58:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


 
Natalee Holloway's Mother 'Guardedly Optimistic' About New Arrest

Monday , May 22, 2006

 

 
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  — The mother of missing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is "guardedly optimistic" about the Dutch arrest last week of a new suspect in connection with their daughter's disappearance.

"An arrest is better than no arrest, so hopefully it will bring about something," said Beth Holloway Twitty, mentioning how there have been many supects and arrests but few answers.

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?


sneakers


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 10:58:42 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK, help me remember this, k?

Guido and Joran were supposed to have a tennis date the day after Nat went missing............is that right?

Yep and they did meet up that night at another casino.  Read Andre Dos Santo's statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:59:01 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
If memory serves me, no one saw them playing, and I remember thinking they were probably disposing of Natalee.

I THINK this came up when Guido was questioned.



YEP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 10:59:47 PM
Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 11:00:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK, help me remember this, k?

Guido and Joran were supposed to have a tennis date the day after Nat went missing............is that right?

Yep and they did meet up that night at another casino.  Read Andre Dos Santo's statement.


Thx..........I'll do that. Guido's lawyer is a heavy hitter, and I wish that weren't the case. Sometimes a good lawyer is better than a good alibi.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:02:18 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


so for all the CRACK SMOKERS that cant seem to put the CRACK PIPE down for more than 3 minutes

even ALE  thinks it was A MURDER and not a RUNAWAY


GESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHH

that horse was beaten to death so many times, i cant believe ANYONE  actually believes she might have run away


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:04:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


 
Natalee Holloway's Mother 'Guardedly Optimistic' About New Arrest

Monday , May 22, 2006

 

 
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  — The mother of missing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is "guardedly optimistic" about the Dutch arrest last week of a new suspect in connection with their daughter's disappearance.

"An arrest is better than no arrest, so hopefully it will bring about something," said Beth Holloway Twitty, mentioning how there have been many supects and arrests but few answers.

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 01, 2006, 11:06:45 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


 
Natalee Holloway's Mother 'Guardedly Optimistic' About New Arrest

Monday , May 22, 2006

 

 
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  — The mother of missing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is "guardedly optimistic" about the Dutch arrest last week of a new suspect in connection with their daughter's disappearance.

"An arrest is better than no arrest, so hopefully it will bring about something," said Beth Holloway Twitty, mentioning how there have been many supects and arrests but few answers.

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.


And, if I am not mistaken, the only time heavy battery was mentioned in any of the charges.  It stayed with all of us, I think, Elaine.  WTH did it come from...you're right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 11:07:05 PM
So here are a couple things that we learned or that were confirmed by Jossy on Dana Pretzer.

1.  Jossy has a tape of DOMPIG where Dompig says they have enough evidence to charge JK2 with kidnapping and rape which would put them in jail for 8 years.

2.  KJ is leaving January 1, 2007

3.  There is a statement made by Guido that he and Joran had more than a patonic relationship at one time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:07:24 PM
Dutch police detain man in Holloway case
Deseret News (Salt Lake City),  May 22, 2006  by Toby Sterling Associated Press
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands -- Dutch police have detained a man on suspicion of participating in the kidnapping and killing of Natalee Holloway last year in Aruba, the suspect's lawyer said Sunday.

Gerard Sponge said his client, whose name was not disclosed, was suspected of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the Alabama high school senior.

The charge is the most severe "in our criminal code," Sponge said on the Netherlands national television broadcaster, NOS.

Holloway was 18 when she went missing in May 2005 during a graduation trip to the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba with classmates. She was last seen leaving a bar with three young men on May 30.

Dutch marines, the Aruban Coast Guard, the FBI and hundreds of volunteers have all searched the island and coastal areas of Aruba for Holloway, to no avail.

The suspect was arrested Wednesday and is being questioned in the city of Utrecht, Sponge said. The suspect has not been formally charged. The questioning was to continue Monday, he said.

Advertisement

Sponge said he planned to file a suit Monday to prevent his client from being extradited to Aruba.

Karin Janise, a prosecutor in Aruba's public prosecutor's office, declined to comment on the arrest.

Authorities have previously arrested eight people in connection with Holloway's disappearance and then released them for lack of evidence.

Sponge said the suspect is a friend of Joran van der Sloot -- the last person known to have seen Holloway alive. Van der Sloot says he left Holloway alone on a beach after the pair kissed.

The suspect was questioned three times in Aruba shortly after Holloway's disappearance and twice later by Dutch authorities, Sponge said.

Utrecht police spokeswoman Danielle Freedman said Dutch officials will not comment on the investigation, which is being carried out under the authority of Aruban prosecutors.

Holloway's parents are attempting to sue van der Sloot, 18, in a New York court. Their suit alleges he imprisoned and sexually assaulted Holloway.

Copyright C 2006 Deseret News Publishing Co.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:08:47 PM
guido spilled the beans


he gave JORANKILL a ride home



BET the FARM

ITS a LOCK

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:09:26 PM
The suspect was questioned three times in Aruba shortly after Holloway's disappearance and twice later by Dutch authorities, Sponge said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 01, 2006, 11:09:35 PM
'evening everyone.

Was the meeting between Posner and Guido in his office a rumor? Does anyone know where that came from?

thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:09:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK, help me remember this, k?

Guido and Joran were supposed to have a tennis date the day after Nat went missing............is that right?

Yep and they did meet up that night at another casino.  Read Andre Dos Santo's statement.


Yep, and JVDS cell phone call was from a tower in the southend that day a place where there are alot of brambles and cactus to get faces and hands scratched and shoes lost.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:10:33 PM
getting clearer all the time  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:10:37 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
[
WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.[/quote]

It has me, too, and Guido is the only one whose charges mention that.  I wonder why that is?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:11:19 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"

And, if I am not mistaken, the only time heavy battery was mentioned in any of the charges.  It stayed with all of us, I think, Elaine.  WTH did it come from...you're right.
I am hoping and praying that it means that the prosecution really has more evidence than we have heard about. Hopefully, the reason the judge said he needed more time yesterday, was because a case is going to be filed against these suspects.....I know, I know, but hey we can only hope and pray!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 01, 2006, 11:11:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA:  Are you aware of de Vries doing a followup?

JOSSY:  Yes, I think he will be doing a followup.

DANA:  Is it true that Joran had more than a platonic relationship with Guido.

JOSSY:  Yes, there is a statement to that affect.  I think it's in Guido's statement.

JOSSY:  There is that possibility that Guido is involved.

JOSSY:  I have a video tape of Gerald Dompig that they do have sufficient material to bring these boys in on kidnapping and rape.  Which would be 8 years imprisonment.

KJ is the lynchpin in the case, she holds the key to what goes down.  She's the main player in the coverup.  Hope she enjoys her retirement and sleeps well at night knowing there's a mother out there that wants to know what happened to her daughter.
KJ is one stone cold hearted b itch. Wonder if she has any children?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 01, 2006, 11:12:32 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.

It bothered me too Elaine.  Just like the Premeditated Murder charge against Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:12:44 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Elaine"
[
WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.


It has me, too, and Guido is the only one whose charges mention that.  I wonder why that is?[/quote]

cause he was with JORAN when the body was moved and buried

let  me tell you another GREAT WAY that JORAN the LIE FACTORY
tells TREMENDOUS LIES

wanna hear it  ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:12:47 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Elaine"
[
WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.


It has me, too, and Guido is the only one whose charges mention that.  I wonder why that is?[/quote]Yes, and it does make him look rather involved!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:12:53 PM
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:13:42 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Red"
Special thanks to Jossy for dropping a couple of bombshells tonight.

1) KJ leaving ... getting out of Dodge. Are any of the original usual suspects still in Aruba?

2) So Jossy has a tape of Dompig making some comments about the case. Wonder what else the tape has on it? ;)   :roll:
Was wondering when this was going to be said, glad Jossy used SM to get it out.
Jossy also confirmed that Guido admits to "more than freinds" with Joran, in a statement Guido gave in Court.....I would bet that Joran is getting upset, right about now!! :wink:


I bet Anita is pretty upset too. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:15:01 PM
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:15:58 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Elaine"
[
WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.


It has me, too, and Guido is the only one whose charges mention that.  I wonder why that is?


cause he was with JORAN when the body was moved and buried

let  me tell you another GREAT WAY that JORAN the LIE FACTORY
tells TREMENDOUS LIES

wanna hear it  ?[/quote]sure, go ahead...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 11:16:03 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:17:19 PM
my quotes arent posting right, I apologize to anyone who's quotes got screwed up in my posts :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:17:39 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.



Well, those who speak the language do.  Still think its a translation error when Guido speaks perfect Dutch?  And I doubt Guido thinks of it as a fling of any sort.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 01, 2006, 11:18:39 PM
Does anyone remember where we heard that there was a meeting in Posner's office with Guido?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:19:04 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Elaine"
I don't know, but that heavy battery charge has always bothered me. They must KNOW something that we have not heard yet.

It bothered me too Elaine.  Just like the Premeditated Murder charge against Paulus.
that premeditated stuff is pretty creepy too, you are right!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:19:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Ah, other than platonic to me means romantic.

I think the term 'relationship' used in the statements actually meant something like 'best buddies' 'friend forever' type thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 11:19:59 PM
I want that D**N videotape of Joran coming into the casino. I want a close-up of his shoes. He's been tap dancing about his shoes from day one, and anything that scares him like that is worth knowing about.

Here's my biggest fear of all: After all this time, I just can't imagine there is ANYTHING left forensically(sp?). And all involved would know that if it's all gone they just have to shut up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:21:08 PM
.
I wonder exactly what Heavy Battery means in Dutch law.  I could ask Rammstein but think he would claim it means something like a massage, all balm like and pleasant.   :evil:

So what is heavy battery as opposed to just battery?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:21:12 PM
joran says "i dont know where she is BURIED"
implying that he has NO idea and how dare anyone accuse him of that crime.


BUT, the truth is he DID bury her but he may not be actually able to tell
anyone where she is EXACTLY..because of the terrain and the time of night  etc etc etc



he tells one lie but there is always shades of the truth in there somewhere
 


thats the sneaky way he is...

"i dont know where she is BURIED"

implies SHE was BURIED, said in a FIT of rage  

it does not imply she was in the water, or anywhere else

she is buried  on the island, and guido might know a bit more than he told joran


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:22:14 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want that D**N videotape of Joran coming into the casino. I want a close-up of his shoes. He's been tap dancing about his shoes from day one, and anything that scares him like that is worth knowing about.

Here's my biggest fear of all: After all this time, I just can't imagine there is ANYTHING left forensically(sp?). And all involved would know that if it's all gone they just have to shut up.


well, if they see broken bones, certainly Natalee wasnt doing the breaking

i hate them all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:22:51 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder exactly what Heavy Battery means in Dutch law.  I could ask Rammstein but think he would claim it means something like a massage, all balm like and pleasant.   :evil:

So what is heavy battery as opposed to just battery?

.


BRUTALITY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 11:23:05 PM
I did not know that Jossy had a tape, but Dompig has said this before.
The problem is that Joran told so many stories at different times that
how can they pick ONE out and make it stick ? Because he denied it later. And they have nothing but witness who were later suspects who constantly changed their stories. Without any sort of outside evidence,
with the only " evidence " coming from the prime suspect who recants,  
how can they lay the charges ?
..
The judge, don't know which one ( s ) was well aware of these stories and still let them out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 01, 2006, 11:23:18 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder exactly what Heavy Battery means in Dutch law.  I could ask Rammstein but think he would claim it means something like a massage, all balm like and pleasant.   :evil:

So what is heavy battery as opposed to just battery?

.
Heavy Battery to me is beating someone and leaving them close to death.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 01, 2006, 11:23:45 PM
picking up daughter


back in a bit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Cat on December 01, 2006, 11:24:16 PM
I think they are called Sociopaths today.Something about not understandind or caring about the rules and mores of human society.I have killed animals before,when I hunted,didn't enjoy it.Found wimmen were more fun to try to understand.I know that song.I heard in Kentucky.I do not really understand wimmen,I just feed DARK Chocolate,Ice Cream,and listen to them.Tonight Little sprout wants to come under my arm...She is recovering from surgery and the Dr said she could.Strange search warrents in aruba.remember,to joran ,we are only prey.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 11:26:05 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Ah, other than platonic to me means romantic.

I think the term 'relationship' used in the statements actually meant something like 'best buddies' 'friend forever' type thing.


The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 01, 2006, 11:26:10 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want that D**N videotape of Joran coming into the casino. I want a close-up of his shoes. He's been tap dancing about his shoes from day one, and anything that scares him like that is worth knowing about.

Here's my biggest fear of all: After all this time, I just can't imagine there is ANYTHING left forensically(sp?). And all involved would know that if it's all gone they just have to shut up.


well, if they see broken bones, certainly Natalee wasnt doing the breaking

i hate them all

Well according to Aruba people commit suicide and they also bury themselves.  Heck why not throw broken bones in there also. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:26:23 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


That 'slippers' comment always seemed weird to me too. Maybe slippers has a different meaning to him ? But it's really odd; Also, there is more than meets the eye regarding the racquet club in this crime. It seems to be a main communication hub with this group.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:26:56 PM
Quote from: "robots"
joran says "i dont know where she is BURIED"
implying that he has NO idea and how dare anyone accuse him of that crime.

BUT, the truth is he DID bury her but he may not be actually able to tell
anyone where she is EXACTLY..because of the terrain and the time of night  etc etc etc

he tells one lie but there is always shades of the truth in there somewhere

thats the sneaky way he is...

"i dont know where she is BURIED"

implies SHE was BURIED, said in a FIT of rage  

it does not imply she was in the water, or anywhere else

she is buried  on the island, and guido might know a bit more than he told joran


Same with the K2' on the in car taping

'If they find the girl'

They knew that JVDS and family handled the body disposal whatever it might have been but don't know where the body is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:28:06 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I wonder exactly what Heavy Battery means in Dutch law.  I could ask Rammstein but think he would claim it means something like a massage, all balm like and pleasant.   :evil:

So what is heavy battery as opposed to just battery?

.
Heavy Battery to me is beating someone and leaving them close to death.


Well, I wonder.  Does it involve the use of a weapon of some sort or would that be bludgeoning?

I have to wonder why this charge was never brought against say the Kalpoes or any of the other witnesses.  Is Guido just a witness or is he a suspect?  Will he be included in this blanket release before the judge now?

More questions from this new information than answers.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:28:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Ah, other than platonic to me means romantic.

I think the term 'relationship' used in the statements actually meant something like 'best buddies' 'friend forever' type thing.


The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


I know and again I think there is confusion in the understanding of Guido's statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:29:12 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


That 'slippers' comment always seemed weird to me too. Maybe slippers has a different meaning to him ? But it's really odd; Also, there is more than meets the eye regarding the racquet club in this crime. It seems to be a main communication hub with this group.


Slippers might mean what I call 'boat shoes' or maybe even 'thongs'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 11:29:33 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Ah, other than platonic to me means romantic.

I think the term 'relationship' used in the statements actually meant something like 'best buddies' 'friend forever' type thing.


The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


I know and again I think there is confusion in the understanding of Guido's statement.


WHY?  Jossy understands Dutch and English very well.  I don't understand why you don't believe this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 11:29:39 PM
The raquet club was supposed to be the location of the Guido-Joran tennis match that didn't happen, right?

If Guido made the "confession" that he and Joran were lovers, then I smell a "Lawyer Tactic".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:29:58 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Ah, other than platonic to me means romantic.

I think the term 'relationship' used in the statements actually meant something like 'best buddies' 'friend forever' type thing.


If they were eight years old, maybe, but this is different and Guido has announced to the world that he prefers guys to girls.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 01, 2006, 11:31:33 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


That 'slippers' comment always seemed weird to me too. Maybe slippers has a different meaning to him ? But it's really odd; Also, there is more than meets the eye regarding the racquet club in this crime. It seems to be a main communication hub with this group.


Slippers might mean what I call 'boat shoes' or maybe even 'thongs'.


Although I thought 'slippers' was odd, I, too, thought the same, or those athletic slides everyone wears.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:32:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


Ah, other than platonic to me means romantic.

I think the term 'relationship' used in the statements actually meant something like 'best buddies' 'friend forever' type thing.


The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


I know and again I think there is confusion in the understanding of Guido's statement.


WHY?  Jossy understands Dutch and English very well.  I don't understand why you don't believe this?



I don't either and believe Guido might be in a better position to know the nature of the relationship.  It is quite clear that at least Guido thinks they have something going on other than best buddies.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:32:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"

The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


I know and again I think there is confusion in the understanding of Guido's statement.


WHY?  Jossy understands Dutch and English very well.  I don't understand why you don't believe this?


Again Jossy didn't make the 'other than platonic' statement, that was in the question.

And Jossy only said 'there is a statement', that dosen't mean he agrees with the statement or that he knows for sure there isn't a misunderstanding of the statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:34:05 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


That 'slippers' comment always seemed weird to me too. Maybe slippers has a different meaning to him ? But it's really odd; Also, there is more than meets the eye regarding the racquet club in this crime. It seems to be a main communication hub with this group.


Slippers might mean what I call 'boat shoes' or maybe even 'thongs'.


Thongs, I bet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:35:07 PM
I think slippers means loafers or docksiders or some sort of hard soled non tying leather shoe.  What I mean is these would be harder to walk to the casino in than the sneakers and usually have sort of slick soles, etc. just seems that since Joran was just in the casino the day before in sneakers this change would not be necessary and is even out of character for him.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 11:35:18 PM
Do we have any eveidence that Guido ever had a girlfriend? Pictures, etc?


I know I'm stepping out on thin ice here, so please don't flame me. Trust me, I'm NOT prejudiced and am not a homophobic. Having said that, sometimes stereotypes begin because there is some commonality that creates a picture ( I know, it won't apply to everybody). BUT, I'm compelled to say that it's easier for me to believe that Guido is gay than to believe that Joran is bi-sexual.

OK, I'm ducking the tomatoes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:35:45 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The raquet club was supposed to be the location of the Guido-Joran tennis match that didn't happen, right?

If Guido made the "confession" that he and Joran were lovers, then I smell a "Lawyer Tactic".


I've wondered about the 'tactic' thing myself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:36:31 PM
Again it may just be my predjudices, but I'm pretty darn sure JVDS is from what all I have seen is very much a hetero to the point of mysoginist.

Pretty sure half the mountains made about the case are because of molehills of misunderstanding/misinterpretations of foreign language transcriptions.

Especially in aruba where there are at least 3 languages spoken all the time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:38:06 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"

The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


I know and again I think there is confusion in the understanding of Guido's statement.


WHY?  Jossy understands Dutch and English very well.  I don't understand why you don't believe this?


Again Jossy didn't make the 'other than platonic' statement, that was in the question.

And Jossy only said 'there is a statement', that dosen't mean he agrees with the statement or that he knows for sure there isn't a misunderstanding of the statement.



The first word out of Jossy's mouth is YES indicating that yes, such a statement of the non-platonic relationship exists.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:38:38 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The raquet club was supposed to be the location of the Guido-Joran tennis match that didn't happen, right?

If Guido made the "confession" that he and Joran were lovers, then I smell a "Lawyer Tactic".


I've wondered about the 'tactic' thing myself.



Again, I haven't seen anyware that has been any protestions of 'lovers' between Guido and JVDS, just the word 'relationship' showed up and we don't really know for sure what that means to them.

Just like the word 'slippers' what did JVDS mean by that statement?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:39:47 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"

The question to Jossy was this:

Is it true that there is a statement where it's said that Joran and Guido had something other than a platonic relationship?.

Jossy's answer was this:

Yes, it's true there is a statement, but just one statement.  I believe it's Guido's witness statement.


I know and again I think there is confusion in the understanding of Guido's statement.


WHY?  Jossy understands Dutch and English very well.  I don't understand why you don't believe this?


Again Jossy didn't make the 'other than platonic' statement, that was in the question.

And Jossy only said 'there is a statement', that dosen't mean he agrees with the statement or that he knows for sure there isn't a misunderstanding of the statement.



The first word out of Jossy's mouth is YES indicating that yes, such a statement of the non-platonic relationship exists.


Sorry, just hate to see you all heading off into a dead end.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 11:39:55 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Again it may just be my predjudices, but I'm pretty darn sure JVDS is from what all I have seen is very much a hetero to the point of mysoginist.

Pretty sure half the mountains made about the case are because of molehills of misunderstanding/misinterpretations of foreign language transcriptions.

Especially in aruba where there are at least 3 languages spoken all the time.

Sorry, but to me Joran looks and acts very much bi-sexual.  I could care less what his sexual preference is.  What I do care about is if there's reason to believe that Guido participated in the murder or assisted in covering up a crime.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 01, 2006, 11:40:15 PM
Hiya Monkeys

I for one believe Jossy meant exactly what we know non platonic means.
Car...after all we have learned about the goon child why wouldn't yoou think his door could swing both ways?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:40:58 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know that Jossy had a tape, but Dompig has said this before.
The problem is that Joran told so many stories at different times that
how can they pick ONE out and make it stick ? Because he denied it later. And they have nothing but witness who were later suspects who constantly changed their stories. Without any sort of outside evidence,
with the only " evidence " coming from the prime suspect who recants,  
how can they lay the charges ?
..
The judge, don't know which one ( s ) was well aware of these stories and still let them out.


As Jossy said a long time ago: it's the judiciary at fault. I read some of what Rammerstein posted today in his frantic defense of the judges, and the poor guy doesn't even realize that he is defending tyrants and tyrannical behaviour. The judges totally rule there...they are mini-kings. No wonder Paulus wanted to become one. They have total power. Corruption reigns supreme


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:41:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Again it may just be my predjudices, but I'm pretty darn sure JVDS is from what all I have seen is very much a hetero to the point of mysoginist.

Pretty sure half the mountains made about the case are because of molehills of misunderstanding/misinterpretations of foreign language transcriptions.

Especially in aruba where there are at least 3 languages spoken all the time.

Sorry, but to me Joran looks and acts very much bi-sexual.  I could care less what his sexual preference is.  What I do care about is if there's reason to believe that Guido participated in the murder or assisted in covering up a crime.


Yep, I totally agree that there is a strong possiblity that Guido probably assisted in the covering up of the crime.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:44:25 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know that Jossy had a tape, but Dompig has said this before.
The problem is that Joran told so many stories at different times that
how can they pick ONE out and make it stick ? Because he denied it later. And they have nothing but witness who were later suspects who constantly changed their stories. Without any sort of outside evidence,
with the only " evidence " coming from the prime suspect who recants,  
how can they lay the charges ?
..
The judge, don't know which one ( s ) was well aware of these stories and still let them out.


As Jossy said a long time ago: it's the judiciary at fault. I read some of what Rammerstein posted today in his frantic defense of the judges, and the poor guy doesn't even realize that he is defending tyrants and tyrannical behaviour. The judges totally rule there...they are mini-kings. No wonder Paulus wanted to become one. They have total power. Corruption reigns supreme


Heh, heh, yeah, but in their world that is the one and only right way to do things.

Heck they sure wouldn't want to trust their fate to 12 ordinary hick citizens.

At least here we can usually chose a judge or jury trial.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:44:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Again it may just be my predjudices, but I'm pretty darn sure JVDS is from what all I have seen is very much a hetero to the point of misogynist.

Pretty sure half the mountains made about the case are because of molehills of misunderstanding/misinterpretations of foreign language transcriptions.

Especially in aruba where there are at least 3 languages spoken all the time.



Gays are often highly misogynistic and so I would think a bisexual could well be.  Guido has admitted to being gay for some time and believe it is stated on his modeling site or was until he took it down.  This is not something that has just suddenly come up about Guido.

No, I don't buy that heterosexuals are more likely to be misogynists at all.



And I am not at all sure what mountains you are claiming have been made out of molehills because of any translation errors .  Could you please cite a few of these because I can't think of even one that could be attributed to any language problems.

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:45:42 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Again it may just be my predjudices, but I'm pretty darn sure JVDS is from what all I have seen is very much a hetero to the point of misogynist.

Pretty sure half the mountains made about the case are because of molehills of misunderstanding/misinterpretations of foreign language transcriptions.

Especially in aruba where there are at least 3 languages spoken all the time.



Gays are often highly misogynistic and so I would think a bisexual could well be.  Guido has admitted to being gay for some time and believe it is stated on his modeling site or was until he took it down.  This is not something that has just suddenly come up about Guido.

No, I don't buy that heterosexuals are more likely to be misogynists at all.

And I am not at all sure what mountains you are claiming have been made out of molehills because of any translation errors .  Could you please cite a few of these because I can't think of even one that could be attributed to any language problems.
.
.


Ok, I tried, I'll agree to disagree on this one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 01, 2006, 11:46:00 PM
It's a misconception that because a "player" in this case is innocent because his sexual orientation is for same sex partners. Obviously, the motive for drugging and kidnapping a girl could have been for monetary gain vs sexual satisfaction. But, more to the point, a very dear gay friend and I ( who happens to be a Psychiatric Nurse Specialist with perscriptive authority) talked at length about this when it came up and his perspective was interesting. He said that it is very common for a young gay male to participate in something with sexual content with straight guys, particularly if he wasn't "out". He also said that often the real motive for extending the effort was attraction to one of the friends.
Of course, he also pointed out that rape isn't about sex anyway. It's about dominance and power and violence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:47:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
I think slippers means loafers or docksiders or some sort of hard soled non tying leather shoe.  What I mean is these would be harder to walk to the casino in than the sneakers and usually have sort of slick soles, etc. just seems that since Joran was just in the casino the day before in sneakers this change would not be necessary and is even out of character for him.

.


You know, Anna, I never even believed him. Just another lie, but I wondered why? Or was he just amusing himself, telling this slipper lie?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:47:34 PM
I think Guido participated in more than just the cover-up, HE is the one who was arrested on charges of HEAVY BATTERY,,,along with the other charges


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:51:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The raquet club was supposed to be the location of the Guido-Joran tennis match that didn't happen, right?

If Guido made the "confession" that he and Joran were lovers, then I smell a "Lawyer Tactic".


I've wondered about the 'tactic' thing myself.



Again, I haven't seen anyware that has been any protestions of 'lovers' between Guido and JVDS, just the word 'relationship' showed up and we don't really know for sure what that means to them.

Just like the word 'slippers' what did JVDS mean by that statement?




Nothing at all like the word slippers.  There we have one word.  With the non-platonic relationship (no one said declarations of love had been made, you added that bit) we have an entire statement for backing it up.  We have a description of the relationship by one of the participants.  We have no description of slippers, only the word itself.

So please don't try that cheap trick on me, Carnut!

Not all relationships result in declarations of love, either.  Some are purely seuxal in nature, others might revolve around a certain interest, etc.  No need to exaggerate what was said but it does seem foolish to deny it was even said at all or that you know more about their relataionship than Guido does.  



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:52:01 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
I think Guido participated in more than just the cover-up, HE is the one who was arrested on charges of HEAVY BATTERY,,,along with the other charges
Of course, this is just my own opinion


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 01, 2006, 11:52:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


 
Natalee Holloway's Mother 'Guardedly Optimistic' About New Arrest

Monday , May 22, 2006

 

 
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  — The mother of missing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is "guardedly optimistic" about the Dutch arrest last week of a new suspect in connection with their daughter's disappearance.

"An arrest is better than no arrest, so hopefully it will bring about something," said Beth Holloway Twitty, mentioning how there have been many supects and arrests but few answers.

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?


I keep asking if anyone knows if the story about Guido having a meeting in Posner's office for a reason.

What if Guido's alibi is that he was working and therefore does not fit the known timeline? What is the alibi was provided by Posner, his employer, and Guido was not actually at work?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 01, 2006, 11:53:15 PM
No matter what country, whose laws, it is the rule of law.
What I am trying to get at is there is no " evidence " because they didn't want to find any.
Short of KJ or her replacement laying charges against all three and having one or two K's do a plea bargain which they do not have, but they do have " Crown Witnesses " what after all these months could she possibly do ? Run a weak case ? And have them declared Not Guilty. Once they are declared Not Guilty, they cannot be charged again. The three are in a the postion of power right now because as long as they don't talk, nothing is going to happen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 01, 2006, 11:54:46 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
I think slippers means loafers or docksiders or some sort of hard soled non tying leather shoe.  What I mean is these would be harder to walk to the casino in than the sneakers and usually have sort of slick soles, etc. just seems that since Joran was just in the casino the day before in sneakers this change would not be necessary and is even out of character for him.

.


You know, Anna, I never even believed him. Just another lie, but I wondered why? Or was he just amusing himself, telling this slipper lie?
Pathological liars actually start to beleive their own lies, but it is obvious that Joran likes to amuse himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:55:20 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The raquet club was supposed to be the location of the Guido-Joran tennis match that didn't happen, right?

If Guido made the "confession" that he and Joran were lovers, then I smell a "Lawyer Tactic".


I've wondered about the 'tactic' thing myself.



Again, I haven't seen anyware that has been any protestions of 'lovers' between Guido and JVDS, just the word 'relationship' showed up and we don't really know for sure what that means to them.

Just like the word 'slippers' what did JVDS mean by that statement?


Well...if Guido gave a statement to the police regarding the intimate nature of his friendship with Joran, I daresay in the interest of discretion, he would not be saying "Oh, yes, Joran and I have the major hots for each other, etc. etc. etc." On a formal statement such as that, I think it would be more subtle and it would not be spelled out it detail. "Other than platonic", has a powerful message, and it's not exchanging each other's skate keys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 01, 2006, 11:55:56 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
I think slippers means loafers or docksiders or some sort of hard soled non tying leather shoe.  What I mean is these would be harder to walk to the casino in than the sneakers and usually have sort of slick soles, etc. just seems that since Joran was just in the casino the day before in sneakers this change would not be necessary and is even out of character for him.

.


You know, Anna, I never even believed him. Just another lie, but I wondered why? Or was he just amusing himself, telling this slipper lie?



I always wondered if he had to wear the slippers and couldn't play tennis because he didn't have his sneakers to wear.  Something was wrong with them or he left them somewhere he shouldn't have and had not yet collected them back.

/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 01, 2006, 11:57:11 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Elaine"
I think Guido participated in more than just the cover-up, HE is the one who was arrested on charges of HEAVY BATTERY,,,along with the other charges
Of course, this is just my own opinion

I agree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 01, 2006, 11:58:41 PM
Carnut:
One of many definitions of "platonic" is "free from sensual desire"...Guido was saying that his relationship with Joran was just the opposite.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 01, 2006, 11:59:33 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Carnut:
One of many definitions of "platonic" is "free from sensual desire"...Guido was saying that his relationship with Joran was just the opposite.


Dunno, do we have the actual statement available? Maybe I missed something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:04:07 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
It's a misconception that because a "player" in this case is innocent because his sexual orientation is for same sex partners. Obviously, the motive for drugging and kidnapping a girl could have been for monetary gain vs sexual satisfaction. But, more to the point, a very dear gay friend and I ( who happens to be a Psychiatric Nurse Specialist with perscriptive authority) talked at length about this when it came up and his perspective was interesting. He said that it is very common for a young gay male to participate in something with sexual content with straight guys, particularly if he wasn't "out". He also said that often the real motive for extending the effort was attraction to one of the friends.
Of course, he also pointed out that rape isn't about sex anyway. It's about dominance and power and violence.



Reading about gang rape long ago, think was a Johns Hopkins study said that gang rape is as close to having sex with another male as a male can get without actually doing the deed and that there are heavy components of homosexuality in it.

I think your friend makes a great deal of sense in that it is also the ultimate way to try to prove you are not gay, etc. as in protesting too much.  I also think it would offer something to those too inhibited to engage in normal relationships with women, say those who cannot maintain any relationship for very long or are found under the dining room table at age 17 with a 12 year old girl, people like that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 12:05:50 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
It's a misconception that because a "player" in this case is innocent because his sexual orientation is for same sex partners. Obviously, the motive for drugging and kidnapping a girl could have been for monetary gain vs sexual satisfaction. But, more to the point, a very dear gay friend and I ( who happens to be a Psychiatric Nurse Specialist with perscriptive authority) talked at length about this when it came up and his perspective was interesting. He said that it is very common for a young gay male to participate in something with sexual content with straight guys, particularly if he wasn't "out". He also said that often the real motive for extending the effort was attraction to one of the friends.
Of course, he also pointed out that rape isn't about sex anyway. It's about dominance and power and violence.



Reading about gang rape long ago, think was a Johns Hopkins study said that gang rape is as close to having sex with another male as a male can get without actually doing the deed and that there are heavy components of homosexuality in it.

I think your friend makes a great deal of sense in that it is also the ultimate way to try to prove you are not gay, etc. as in protesting too much.  I also think it would offer something to those too inhibited to engage in normal relationships with women, say those who cannot maintain any relationship for very long or are found under the dining room table at age 17 with a 12 year old girl, people like that.

.


Hey! It wasn't the dinning room table.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: lexie on December 02, 2006, 12:06:42 AM
How old is Guido?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 12:06:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Again it may just be my predjudices, but I'm pretty darn sure JVDS is from what all I have seen is very much a hetero to the point of mysoginist.

Pretty sure half the mountains made about the case are because of molehills of misunderstanding/misinterpretations of foreign language transcriptions.

Especially in aruba where there are at least 3 languages spoken all the time.

Sorry, but to me Joran looks and acts very much bi-sexual.  I could care less what his sexual preference is.  What I do care about is if there's reason to believe that Guido participated in the murder or assisted in covering up a crime.


Yes, I agree also, Klass. Actually, he looks non-sexual but trying to pretend that he's heterosexual, re: all those staged pictures with girls we have been swamped with of late. As Blah said earlier in the day, he just gets way too close to all those guys in all those guy pictures for me. He either sees himself as Mr. Dominant World Hospitality or he's just a little too chummy with the fellas because of other reasons.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 02, 2006, 12:09:01 AM
Quote from: "lexie"
How old is Guido?
I think he will soon be 19 years old, he is very close to Joran's age


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:11:58 AM
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 12:12:24 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
I think slippers means loafers or docksiders or some sort of hard soled non tying leather shoe.  What I mean is these would be harder to walk to the casino in than the sneakers and usually have sort of slick soles, etc. just seems that since Joran was just in the casino the day before in sneakers this change would not be necessary and is even out of character for him.

.


You know, Anna, I never even believed him. Just another lie, but I wondered why? Or was he just amusing himself, telling this slipper lie?



I always wondered if he had to wear the slippers and couldn't play tennis because he didn't have his sneakers to wear.  Something was wrong with them or he left them somewhere he shouldn't have and had not yet collected them back.

/


I know it, but trying to figure it out is maddening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 12:13:46 AM
Babelfish translated 'slipper' as 'pantoffel' from English to Dutch.  A search of a definition of pantoffel came up with mule, which started out with the animal and ironically a drug runner, but also included a shoe with no heal or covering for the heal.  

Since we know the PVs were translated from Papiamento to Dutch and then back to English, I think we know these shoes were slides of some sort...whether flip-flops or slip ons and definitely not sneakers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 12:16:12 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know if GUIDO picked up Joran that night.  Was Guido working at the Excelsior or the Marriott?  Did he get off work at 3am that morning?


 
Natalee Holloway's Mother 'Guardedly Optimistic' About New Arrest

Monday , May 22, 2006

 

 
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands  — The mother of missing Alabama teen Natalee Holloway is "guardedly optimistic" about the Dutch arrest last week of a new suspect in connection with their daughter's disappearance.

"An arrest is better than no arrest, so hopefully it will bring about something," said Beth Holloway Twitty, mentioning how there have been many supects and arrests but few answers.

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.


WHY?  What evidence do they/did they have?


I keep asking if anyone knows if the story about Guido having a meeting in Posner's office for a reason.

What if Guido's alibi is that he was working and therefore does not fit the known timeline? What is the alibi was provided by Posner, his employer, and Guido was not actually at work?


All I remember is that we learned somehow that Posner called him into his office, was mad, and Guido looked scared and nervous. That's all I can recall.. :oops: sorry...my mind is a sieve now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:18:46 AM
Quote from: "Ono"
[All I remember is that we learned somehow that Posner called him into his office, was mad, and Guido looked scared and nervous. That's all I can recall.. :oops: sorry...my mind is a sieve now.


Five or six other employees in the casino said Guido had scratches on his face the day after Natalee disappeared and he was so scared and upset at the meeting that he wet his pants.

Guess he thought Posner was going to whack him right there in his office or something.

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 12:20:53 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.

.


Yes, I wondered that as well about the heavy battery charge; I think Joran has lots of boyfriends.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 02, 2006, 12:21:38 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Babelfish translated 'slipper' as 'pantoffel' from English to Dutch.  A search of a definition of pantoffel came up with mule, which started out with the animal and ironically a drug runner, but also included a shoe with no heal or covering for the heal.  

Since we know the PVs were translated from Papiamento to Dutch and then back to English, I think we know these shoes were slides of some sort...whether flip-flops or slip ons and definitely not sneakers.
Good work !..............Monkeys, keep up the good fight!~Good night all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 12:23:21 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Ono"
[All I remember is that we learned somehow that Posner called him into his office, was mad, and Guido looked scared and nervous. That's all I can recall.. :oops: sorry...my mind is a sieve now.


Five or six other employees in the casino said Guido had scratches on his face the day after Natalee disappeared and he was so scared and upset at the meeting that he wet his pants.

Guess he thought Posner was going to whack him right there in his office or something.

 :roll:


 :lol: I think if I had been Posner, I'd be mad too.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 12:28:35 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Babelfish translated 'slipper' as 'pantoffel' from English to Dutch.  A search of a definition of pantoffel came up with mule, which started out with the animal and ironically a drug runner, but also included a shoe with no heal or covering for the heal.  

Since we know the PVs were translated from Papiamento to Dutch and then back to English, I think we know these shoes were slides of some sort...whether flip-flops or slip ons and definitely not sneakers.
Good work !..............Monkeys, keep up the good fight!~Good night all!


Good Night Elaine!
I gotta go too...I am Aruba-ed out for tonight. This is the most stealthily treacherous and deceitful pack of criminals I have ever tried to figure out  but the good guys will win in the end. The truth will emerge faster than we can say: "Jack Robinson!" Steady on all ~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:29:12 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


Anna, that is exactly what I have always thought, because the "bag" seemed significant that day and the call that Carnut referred to came from a part of the island where the shoes could have been buried, or even Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 12:29:53 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Ono"
[All I remember is that we learned somehow that Posner called him into his office, was mad, and Guido looked scared and nervous. That's all I can recall.. :oops: sorry...my mind is a sieve now.


Five or six other employees in the casino said Guido had scratches on his face the day after Natalee disappeared and he was so scared and upset at the meeting that he wet his pants.

Guess he thought Posner was going to whack him right there in his office or something.

 :roll:


Maybe Posner called him into his office to ask him outright if he was involved. Guido confesses, and Posner takes care of the "alibi". The alibi being that Guido was at work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:31:15 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


I REMEMBER A QUOTE FROM LORENZO THAT SOMEONE TOLD US, AND NOW IT IS MAKING SENSE.  

LORENZO SAID HE DID NOT HAVE ANY ASSOCIATION WITH THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY.  WE THOUGHT HE MEANT K2 BUT I BET HE MEANT JORAN AND GUIDO, AS IN FUDGE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 12:31:36 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.

.

I agree Anna.  That kid is stuck to Joran like glue.  I wonder if he is one of Joran's roommates.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: lexie on December 02, 2006, 12:32:27 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "lexie"
How old is Guido?
I think he will soon be 19 years old, he is very close to Joran's age


So at the time of the disappearance both were 17... We have heard that while the NL openly acknowledges gay relationships, Aruba does not.  

So we have two immature individuals, who may have been involved in a non-platonic relationship.  At this age, it could have been nothing more than sexual experimentation.  But, this is a relationship that might or might not be accepted by their parents and peers on Aruba, and most likely was kept somewhat quiet.

We saw Joran's websites, filled with out of control drinking, sexual promiscuity and pornography.  We can see his attitude toward women in general (even patting his mother's head).  His photos include Axeman, the belt photos, etc.  These kids clearly tried it all.  Were these activities with girls an effort to prove he was heterosexual, or, were they opportunities to degrade and debase.

Add to that the anger management issues, his arrogance and sense of self-importance.   It is not hard to imagine how an individual with this personality make up and sexual confusion could result in disaster.  We know very little about Guido's personality or behaviors.  But we have seen much of Joran's throught the past year.

I think this is why the statement from Guido is important in this case.  It puts a new light on some of the information we have had previously about the personalities involved, especially Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 12:33:08 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
It's a misconception that because a "player" in this case is innocent because his sexual orientation is for same sex partners. Obviously, the motive for drugging and kidnapping a girl could have been for monetary gain vs sexual satisfaction. But, more to the point, a very dear gay friend and I ( who happens to be a Psychiatric Nurse Specialist with perscriptive authority) talked at length about this when it came up and his perspective was interesting. He said that it is very common for a young gay male to participate in something with sexual content with straight guys, particularly if he wasn't "out". He also said that often the real motive for extending the effort was attraction to one of the friends.
Of course, he also pointed out that rape isn't about sex anyway. It's about dominance and power and violence.




Reading about gang rape long ago, think was a Johns Hopkins study said that gang rape is as close to having sex with another male as a male can get without actually doing the deed and that there are heavy components of homosexuality in it.

I think your friend makes a great deal of sense in that it is also the ultimate way to try to prove you are not gay, etc. as in protesting too much.  I also think it would offer something to those too inhibited to engage in normal relationships with women, say those who cannot maintain any relationship for very long or are found under the dining room table at age 17 with a 12 year old girl, people like that.

.


You're scary, Anna! My friend has absolutely no doubt about his orientation: gay. Never had sex with a woman in his life, and been an active little critter throughout his life. He's middle aged. Yet, one night we were having a few that turned into a few too many, and out of the blue he told me that he had fantasized about a sexual encounter with me, and the fantasy included another guy. NOTHING happened and for the record, I would never be interested in any gendered "competition" for attention, thank you, but I was shocked he could go there. NOT because of the "threesome" factor, but because one of the three was female. It began a really long conversation (we're really close) and the bottom line is that it was fear, and inhibition that kept him from even being able to fantasize without the comfort of what was known and comfortable to him.

OT, but I have to conclude by saying that it was so weird to me to experience this normally "incredibly sensitive and insightful to others" guy whom I love like family, have no thought at all to how impossibly inhibiting for me it would be to be intimate with one gay guy, much less 2! I'm a lot of things, but I AM NOT a man!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:34:16 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


I REMEMBER A QUOTE FROM LORENZO THAT SOMEONE TOLD US, AND NOW IT IS MAKING SENSE.  

LORENZO SAID HE DID NOT HAVE ANY ASSOCIATION WITH THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY.  WE THOUGHT HE MEANT K2 BUT I BET HE MEANT JORAN AND GUIDO, AS IN FUDGE.


Wasn't it Peeps who said that?  I don't think we have ever had any contact with Lorenzo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 02, 2006, 12:36:49 AM
Joran may be bisexual or even fully gay. He most certainly is sexually opportunistic.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:37:25 AM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know that Jossy had a tape, but Dompig has said this before.
The problem is that Joran told so many stories at different times that
how can they pick ONE out and make it stick ? Because he denied it later. And they have nothing but witness who were later suspects who constantly changed their stories. Without any sort of outside evidence,
with the only " evidence " coming from the prime suspect who recants,  
how can they lay the charges ?
..
The judge, don't know which one ( s ) was well aware of these stories and still let them out.


As Jossy said a long time ago: it's the judiciary at fault. I read some of what Rammerstein posted today in his frantic defense of the judges, and the poor guy doesn't even realize that he is defending tyrants and tyrannical behaviour. The judges totally rule there...they are mini-kings. No wonder Paulus wanted to become one. They have total power. Corruption reigns supreme


Is Rammstein one of Paulus' friends?  I have always thought so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 12:38:52 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


I REMEMBER A QUOTE FROM LORENZO THAT SOMEONE TOLD US, AND NOW IT IS MAKING SENSE.  

LORENZO SAID HE DID NOT HAVE ANY ASSOCIATION WITH THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY.  WE THOUGHT HE MEANT K2 BUT I BET HE MEANT JORAN AND GUIDO, AS IN FUDGE.


Wasn't it Peeps who said that?  I don't think we have ever had any contact with Lorenzo.


It was Peeps and I'm pretty sure he was referring to the K2's.

Course not sure what the term 'chocolate' really means in aruban colloquialisms.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 12:41:10 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


I REMEMBER A QUOTE FROM LORENZO THAT SOMEONE TOLD US, AND NOW IT IS MAKING SENSE.  

LORENZO SAID HE DID NOT HAVE ANY ASSOCIATION WITH THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY.  WE THOUGHT HE MEANT K2 BUT I BET HE MEANT JORAN AND GUIDO, AS IN FUDGE.

I believe this is what he meant also Tyler.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 12:41:32 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Joran may be bisexual or even fully gay. He most certainly is sexually opportunistic.


Exactly. These are not just your average 17 yo kids. They are into the hardcore stuff, and I'm not talking about porn. They make films of having sex with underage, unconscious girls. They do whatever to get a thrill.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:41:48 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Joran may be bisexual or even fully gay. He most certainly is sexually opportunistic.



I think that's the deal, Justins.  While Guido may be openly gay, I think Joran is so jaded from exposure to all the porn from such an early age, etc. he just has to keep upping the ante to get the same thrill.  

Done that twenty times before so have to change the scenario and intensify some way.  More and more required all the time.  Sad and sorry situation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:41:55 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
It's a misconception that because a "player" in this case is innocent because his sexual orientation is for same sex partners. Obviously, the motive for drugging and kidnapping a girl could have been for monetary gain vs sexual satisfaction. But, more to the point, a very dear gay friend and I ( who happens to be a Psychiatric Nurse Specialist with perscriptive authority) talked at length about this when it came up and his perspective was interesting. He said that it is very common for a young gay male to participate in something with sexual content with straight guys, particularly if he wasn't "out". He also said that often the real motive for extending the effort was attraction to one of the friends.
Of course, he also pointed out that rape isn't about sex anyway. It's about dominance and power and violence.



Reading about gang rape long ago, think was a Johns Hopkins study said that gang rape is as close to having sex with another male as a male can get without actually doing the deed and that there are heavy components of homosexuality in it.

I think your friend makes a great deal of sense in that it is also the ultimate way to try to prove you are not gay, etc. as in protesting too much.  I also think it would offer something to those too inhibited to engage in normal relationships with women, say those who cannot maintain any relationship for very long or are found under the dining room table at age 17 with a 12 year old girl, people like that.

.


I got flamed for bringing this up when the church sisters were here, but I do have many gay friends.  Many gay men in rose societies, house staging as relates to decorating that I once did, and I have been told by more than one that sometimes gay men will "gang rape" a woman, one after the other and it gives them a sense of them all having sex together with each other.  Really strange and I guess I did not want to get too involved in it, even though I asked the question, and it is as if they are all "eating from the same plate" sotaspeak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 12:44:02 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Joran may be bisexual or even fully gay. He most certainly is sexually opportunistic.



I think that's the deal, Justins.  While Guido may be openly gay, I think Joran is so jaded from exposure to all the porn from such an early age, etc. he just has to keep upping the ante to get the same thrill.  

Done that twenty times before so have to change the scenario and intensify some way.  More and more required all the time.  Sad and sorry situation.


Right. This is almost a quote of what I have been saying all day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:45:25 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Still don't think the Guido 'relationship' statement had anything to do with a gay fling.

What do you think other than platonic means?


I REMEMBER A QUOTE FROM LORENZO THAT SOMEONE TOLD US, AND NOW IT IS MAKING SENSE.  

LORENZO SAID HE DID NOT HAVE ANY ASSOCIATION WITH THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY.  WE THOUGHT HE MEANT K2 BUT I BET HE MEANT JORAN AND GUIDO, AS IN FUDGE.


Wasn't it Peeps who said that?  I don't think we have ever had any contact with Lorenzo.


I was thinking it was one of the Aruban people who knew Lorenzo and told us he said that.  It probably was PEEPS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:49:58 AM
I have always thought that Paulus giving Joran the porn for his lap top when he went away to school was very telling.  Supposedly said it would help Joran stay awake during class.

Have seen this as a sort of admission by Paulus of the problem.  Regular classes are too boring for Joran without his porn fix?  And Paulus can relate to that as well??  Talk about dysfunctional family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:51:08 AM
Got this from a website that was not exactly heterosexual.

Another main premise of homosociality that gang rape enacts is that men bond homosocially over/through the bodies of women.

That is, the woman becomes the conduit for male connection–the male bond is “triangulated,” deflected through the body of the woman.** Not that this is homosexual (that would be insulting to gay men), but the very opposite–the presence of a woman serves to nullify the threat of homosexuality implicit within the homosocial bond.

Look at it this way–is there any place besides a woman’s body that straight guys are willing to dip their wicks immediately after another guy put his there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 12:56:40 AM
Tyler, Anna................I think you're right on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:03:36 AM
forgive me.....


Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:00 pm
The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:03 pm
The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left? He was working, maybe?

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:16 pm
He had to be let go

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:55 pm
He has an alibi. So tight. So tight.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:06 am
The important “others” are the ones that supported the alibi.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:57 pm
I mentioned yesterday that there is a gap in the timeline. Where’s Jake?

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:03 pm
The gap is in the timeline. Phone records. Log-on times on PC’s.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:07:15 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
forgive me.....


Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm
The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:00 pm
The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:03 pm
The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left? He was working, maybe?

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:16 pm
He had to be let go

Simian Says: June 22nd, 2005 at 5:55 pm
He has an alibi. So tight. So tight.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:06 am
The important “others” are the ones that supported the alibi.
POSNER?  Did Guido get off earlier and Posner backed up his alibi?

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:57 pm
I mentioned yesterday that there is a gap in the timeline. Where’s Jake?

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 3:03 pm
The gap is in the timeline. Phone records. Log-on times on PC’s.

Simian Says: June 25th, 2005 at 7:41 pm
Kalpoes went home. Joran stayed behind. Somebody had to come get him.


 :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:09:11 AM
He had to be let go?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:10:43 AM

Klaas did Dana post tonight Pod Cast and I am just missing it??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:11:09 AM
This is why I am asking if the story about Posner calling Guido into his office is true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:11:32 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He had to be let go?


probably "released"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:12:13 AM
Quote from: "Sue"

Klaas did Dana post tonight Pod Cast and I am just missing it??

I don't know, but I'll check right now


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:13:04 AM
Quote from: "Sue"

Klaas did Dana post tonight Pod Cast and I am just missing it??


That was what I was about to ask.  I had to finish decorating Christmas tree and could not listen and I want to listen to podcast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:14:13 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"

Klaas did Dana post tonight Pod Cast and I am just missing it??

I don't know, but I'll check right now

Nope don't see it yet.  My guess is either Red or Tom have to put it up on the website.  Most likely Tom, so it will be in the morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:14:35 AM

I just got home from work  I missed the show , and I really like
listening to his shows


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:15:09 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
This is why I am asking if the story about Posner calling Guido into his office is true.

That's a good follow-up question for Jossy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 01:15:30 AM
I'm getting droopy-eyed and am going to turn in. Have a great night and sleep well!

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sweetd.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:15:35 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He had to be let go?


probably "released"


Released, went back to Holland.  Momma Kalpoe was released.  Steve Croes was released.  A lot of people being released.

I think the connection between Deepak and Steve Croes goes back to Antonio Carlo (or whatever his name is) going to talk to the SG.  Antonio Carlo wants to know what they know.  Somehow K2 gets wind of this and they think they are about to take the fall.  Perhaps, for some reason, SC feels the K2 (and maybe even the Sporter) need some help so he agrees to back them  up for the right amount of money.  I think Antonio Carlo was setting up the SGs when he talked with them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:15:42 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"

Klaas did Dana post tonight Pod Cast and I am just missing it??

I don't know, but I'll check right now

Nope don't see it yet.  My guess is either Red or Tom have to put it up on the website.  Most likely Tom, so it will be in the morning.



Ok thank you, Just thought I was going blind must be just tired as hell


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:16:39 AM
Goodnight, CBB.  It has been great having you back to play with the Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:17:27 AM

So did I miss anything interesting with Jossy or same old song and dance


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:24:23 AM
Quote from: "Sue"

So did I miss anything interesting with Jossy or same old song and dance


YES

1.  KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007

2.  Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying they have enough evidence to arrest and convict JK2 of rape and kidnapping which would put them in jail for 8 years.

3.  There is a witness statement where it's stated that Joran and Guido had more than a platonic relationship.  Jossy believes it was in Guido's earlier witness statements.

4.  Jossy believes it may have been Ben Vocking that stopped them from searching the entire Sloot residence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:29:09 AM
We've read it so many times, but everything is a reference to the casinos; house, dirty hand, etc. Read this and plug in Posner

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 5:54 pm
The Arawaks are not going to sacrifice a scapegoat
Babylon needs to allow one sacrifice to keep DirtyHand hidden
Babylon scared of DirtyHand
Arawaks scared of DirtyHand
If sacrifice is made, teepees are safe, villagers and cowboys happy
If DirtyHand discovered, House of Babylon falls, Teepees crushed under great house

Arawaks want to make cowboys happy
Babylonians want to maintain integrity of Great House
Gods of the cowboys know there was a game in the great house,
and so DirtyHand was discovered
But the sacrifice will be offered before dirty hand sings
He will return to babylon, broken but anonymous

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 8:25 pm
The Arawaks want the truth to come out
As long as DirtyHand is not found
Aruba is preserved and Babylon will pay the price
the gods know that the blame lies on babylon
the cowboys will go back to the fort without the loot

Shango Says:June 26th, 2005 at 9:19 pm
DirtyHand is not an Arawak The singing card can not be played
The cowboys would circle the wagons
The arawaks are preparing the sacrifice
light the fires
the gods are talking

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:48 pm
The card of babylon was already played
if it sings, DirtyHand will bring down the Royal House on top of the Arawak Nation

the gods have handed down a pipe of peace, but a sacrifice will be made
Some elders of the game, not just of babylon walk in older circles
cowboys hear the singing, but the words are not understood
The gods and the babylonians are worried about the cowboys response

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:55 pm
DirtyHand walks with the elders
Babylon knows


Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:58 pm
DirtyHand knows the Babylonians that provided escort after the 2 shivas left

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:04 pm
Are the children of the elders there, or did they flee to Babylon?
DirtyHand knows, this is his Power
there will be 46 sacrifices

Shango Says:June 26th, 2005 at 10:13 pm
DirtyHand walks in ALL houses
houses of the Arawaks, and houses of Rave
He can break the alibi

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:18 pm
If the Alibi is broken by DirtyHand the walls of Babylon will shake

Shango Says:June 26th, 2005 at 10:48 pm
Coverups begin with elders and the founders of the houses of Babylon
Not the minions
DirtyHand knows this

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:53 pm
DirtyHand is the key
He walks with the elders
He walks in all houses
And he walked with the fallen elder
he was the hidden card that was played
now if he sings, babylon will fall on the arawak nation

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:01 pm
Of whom is the young Babylonian afraid?
Why won’t he talk?

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:05 pm
The dice throwers know
the maze of the rave
and the fly that entered the trap
DirtyHand is the key
He walks in many circles


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:30:07 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"

So did I miss anything interesting with Jossy or same old song and dance


YES

1.  KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007

She is leaving January 1 but she wants 3 more months, who teh hell is taking the case over

2.  Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying they have enough evidence to arrest and convict JK2 of rape and kidnapping which would put them in jail for 8 years.

If Jossy has tape why doesnt Karin have it????

3.  There is a witness statement where it's stated that Joran and Guido had more than a platonic relationship.  Jossy believes it was in Guido's earlier witness statements.

Joran is just a freak anyways, Probably why is dad bought him porn to try and get him over men

4.  Jossy believes it may have been Ben Vocking that stopped them from searching the entire Sloot residence.


Nothing surprises me there I guess it isnt who you know but who you BLOW on that island


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:31:13 AM
well I guess that response didnt come out to well  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2006, 01:31:35 AM
Tom looks after that, Im sure he will have it on the page in the morning.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:31:44 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
well I guess that response didnt come out to well  :?


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:32:33 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He had to be let go?


probably "released"


Released, went back to Holland.  Momma Kalpoe was released.  Steve Croes was released.  A lot of people being released.

I think the connection between Deepak and Steve Croes goes back to Antonio Carlo (or whatever his name is) going to talk to the SG.  Antonio Carlo wants to know what they know.  Somehow K2 gets wind of this and they think they are about to take the fall.  Perhaps, for some reason, SC feels the K2 (and maybe even the Sporter) need some help so he agrees to back them  up for the right amount of money. I think Antonio Carlo was setting up the SGs when he talked with them.


Maybe, because Carlo implicating Joran and then working in the same office as Paulus doesn't make sense. Was Carlo instead steering KJ away from Guido?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:38:21 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Tom looks after that, Im sure he will have it on the page in the morning.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Thanks Dana I am anxious to listen to the show :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:43:53 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Tom looks after that, Im sure he will have it on the page in the morning.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Thank you, Dana, for everything.  I will listen while working.  Yuk.  Work, so much of it so close to Christmas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:45:17 AM
Are the casinos in Aruba owned by the Dutch?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 01:45:20 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Dana"
Tom looks after that, Im sure he will have it on the page in the morning.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Thank you, Dana, for everything.  I will listen while working.  Yuk.  Work, so much of it so close to Christmas.


Dont feel bad I have so much I will be lucky to live through it :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:46:13 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He had to be let go?


probably "released"


Released, went back to Holland.  Momma Kalpoe was released.  Steve Croes was released.  A lot of people being released.

I think the connection between Deepak and Steve Croes goes back to Antonio Carlo (or whatever his name is) going to talk to the SG.  Antonio Carlo wants to know what they know.  Somehow K2 gets wind of this and they think they are about to take the fall.  Perhaps, for some reason, SC feels the K2 (and maybe even the Sporter) need some help so he agrees to back them  up for the right amount of money. I think Antonio Carlo was setting up the SGs when he talked with them.


Maybe, because Carlo implicating Joran and then working in the same office as Paulus doesn't make sense. Was Carlo instead steering KJ away from Guido?


I am not sure.  I think he talked to the guards to see what they knew.  Carlo may have gotten information from the guards that led him to believe Joran is guilty (shruggins shoulders here).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:50:20 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Are the casinos in Aruba owned by the Dutch?


Not sure about that.  Excelsior is owned by Posner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 01:55:17 AM
Memphis, my husband hypothesizes that Natalee was taken to the Holiday Inn, that they "did" take her back to the HI, and that she was "drugged and stumbling" when they took her.  She was taken through a secret "maze," by Guido and Joran who would know where that secret maze is and out of the peering eyes of any MB students or others.  He believes whatever happened to her, happened at the HI.  Bear in mind that one of the Arubans who posted quite heavily early on went to the HI and said there was a scant number of cameras and she found, herself, that only 1-2 was working.  So it is possible that a camera was not in the location of or was not working where they took her, or a security person was paid to deactivate the cameras.  He also believes that the HI part is right, but when Posner got wind of it, he sent Paulus or someone in to tell the jail birds they best change their stories and keep their "crap" away from the HI and he, thus, fired Guido for getting involved, but helped him cover his tracks. He also believes the mattress that was bloody was from the HI and it was Natalee's blood and the reason rooms at the HI were re-carpeted.

We heard Beth alude to the fact that her conversations on the phones were bugged and that she had Posner call her inquiring as to when she was going to leave Aruba, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 02:04:22 AM
Well Tyler, I think that fits.

Why is Posner steering everything away from the HI? Is it because he is up to his old tricks?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 02:17:56 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Well Tyler, I think that fits.

Why is Posner steering everything away from the HI? Is it because he is up to his old tricks?


Wasn't he given some kind of pardon and if he violates the terms of it, he goes back in the clink.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 02:20:31 AM
Aruba is mob controlled and Holland knows it. Somehow what happened would expose it all. Holland knows and is part of the coverup. I hope that doesn't include DeVries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 02:23:33 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Aruba is mob controlled and Holland knows it. Somehow what happened would expose it all. Holland knows and is part of the coverup. I hope that doesn't include DeVries.


I don't think everybody is bad in Holland.  That's like saying everyone from Alabama is toothless.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 02:23:38 AM
I have no idea.

Why would Aruba agree to cover for him? What's in it for them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 02:25:57 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "memphis"
Aruba is mob controlled and Holland knows it. Somehow what happened would expose it all. Holland knows and is part of the coverup. I hope that doesn't include DeVries.


I don't think everybody is bad in Holland.  That's like saying everyone from Alabama is toothless.


Are you trying to tell me that DeVries is a good guy?
I would be relieved. I don't think everyone is bad, but the coverup seems to go all the way to Holland.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 02:26:47 AM
Goodnight. I'm heading to bed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:04:50 AM
I didn't go to bed.

The following from Getagrip's blog...


Monday, October 17, 2005
Government has its hand over Michael Posner’s head? Notorious Chicago figure active in Aruba casino
DIARIO Aruba
10/17/2005

ORANJESTAD (AAN): Some time ago DIARIO found information regarding the manager of the Holiday Inn’s Excelsior Casino and people have been calling out to ask how a figure with a criminal past of such an extent can be active in the casino industry of Aruba.

His name? Michael Posner, owner (or one of the owners) of the Brickel Hotel situated in front of the big hotels in Malmok. In the past he was arrested in the state of Illinois for violation of the Ricco Act (racketeering) and because he was also involved in the world of prostitution.

He was condemned to 10 years in prison, but apparently he served 8 out of the 10 years. He appealed his case and lost the appeal! After he was released he was on parole for 5 years. His name is also mentioned as an associate of a notorious family.

DIARIO knows that the government is at the height of such people, and asks how he can be active in the casino industry of Aruba. How did he find a permit to work in this branch with the background that he has? How has the Minister of Justice still not taken action against him? Now that his criminal past is known, what is the government waiting for to take him out of Aruba?

During the [election] campaign which recently came to an end, many comments and rumours were circulating regarding contributions to certain politicians, including those in the [current] government. DIARIO hopes that the issue of campaign moneys remain a rumour, because if true, then there are more politicians for sale than is [already] apparent.

The presence of Michael Posner in the Aruba casino industry, with the criminal past that he has, does not speak well of the judicial control system, nor that of National Security, nor of those in charge to check the background of those who work in the tourism industry of Aruba.

This is the damage that one person with such a bad reputation, who was incarcerated during 8 years, who is associated with a notorious family in America, can cause to the tourism of Aruba.

[translated by Getagrip]

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005/11/aruban-casino-owner-with-criminal-past.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:10:10 AM
also from Getagrips' blog....

Monday, November 21, 2005
Aruban casino owner with criminal past goes to America
Joe Mammana is not permitted to enter Aruba due to his past but how did we end up with Mike Posner?
DIARIO Aruba
11/21/2005

ORANJESTAD (AAN) The case of Natalee is taking other unexpected twists and very negative ones that are going to tarnish Aruba’s image as a safe destination for tourists and investors.

Joe Mammana has a very impressive criminal past in the U.S. but for one reason or another he has found publicity with different cases which have set his image straight and in the case of Natalee, he is trying to find national attention in the US by using sensationalism via the American media.

The government of Aruba recently declared that they will not permit Joe Mammana to enter Aruba.

Related to his past and criminal record, the government took the decision via the Minister of Justice that they cannot let such a person enter Aruba and about this there was information circulating that this Joe person sent a threatening letter to those who were detained in Aruba related to the case of Natalee.

The government’s actions in this case were correct because they cannot let this type of person come to Aruba and believe that they can come do what they see fit on our island, and to boot, Mammana is one of those who is trying, body and soul, to organize an unjust and unjustifiable boycott against Aruba.

What is strange is that the government refuses to let this ex-criminal enter Aruba, but on the other hand, permits another ex-criminal, Mike Posner who is going soon to the U.S. for cases of law violations, to be able to have a business in Aruba, and enter and leave Aruba whenever he wants.

To make matters worse, the person in question, Mike Posner, has been able to obtain a permit to operate a casino, where anyone who wants to have a casino in Aruba and the majority of other countries in the world have to have a clean criminal record.

Recently, this information has started to circulate in the U.S. as well, and seeing that it hasn’t been many days since via the American media false information was given that Aruba is a sort of den for criminals and even terrorists, the matter of the Aruba casino owner with a criminal past in the US, is going to help those who want to implement a total boycott against Aruba.

Wasn’t it in Mike Posner’s casino that the principal suspect in Natalee’s case, Joran van der Sloot, was sitting gambling, despite the fact that he was underage and that never should he have been permitted to enter the casino?

Some weeks back, other media in Aruba came out in vanguard of the ex-criminal Mike Posner and wrote and article that praised Mike Posner for his supposed achievements in Aruba and what interest they had with him, nobody knows.

Now that the government refuses an American ex-criminal entry to Aruba, the government has to justify the reason why until today they continue to permit a person with such a police record such as Mike Posner, can come to set up a business in Aruba, continue to operate his business in Aruba and come and go whenever he wants.

What sort of handling of Justice is there in Aruba and what impact will this case have in the US when the American media start to question the government of Aruba about this matter?

This matter is pending because there are more questionable things here and also the role that certain politicians in Aruba play and continue to play in this matter.

[translated by Getagrip]

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005/11/aruban-casino-owner-with-criminal-past.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 03:11:13 AM
Well I went to bed but had to get up as I heard one of the little bitty dogs go outside, forgot to block their doggie door and it is 25 degrees!

That website of GetaGrips remains a wealth of information.  So many things I have forgotten, not one of her articles is a waste of time to read.  Good place to just hang out and read month by month and there are not that many of them.

Thursday if was in the mid seventies here and tonight twenty-five degrees.  Quite a change to adapt to.  Going to go bad to bed under the electric blanket, brrrrr!


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:12:46 AM
goodnight


Title: Thoughts on the Shango Code
Post by: IBE on December 02, 2006, 03:17:57 AM
Re: what's in it for them: money

Re: Shango   It's interesting where he/she uses capitals and small letters with the use of same words... At times there seems to be an implication of one person..thus capitals, then small letters perhaps to tell of others who are not  "the one" or not part of the "all powerful group" or "country" or heritage. I think there is still more to be learned from rereading this Code every time new facts or rumors appear.

DirtyHand and dirtyhand... then the Great House, IMO,  means the Hague which has the long reputation of the good law of the Hague and all it means.. as in the code "Babylonians want to maintain the integrity of the Great House" yet in the next line says "Gods of the cowboys know there was a game in the great house"... notice the use of small letters here... this is a different house? IMO it means the "Gods of the cowboys" (notice also no use of a capital on Cowboys this time)

IMO I think this means "Gods=oversearers either wiretapes with DEA, ALE or casino police if it refers to a "a game in the great house"=casino or hotel or it could mean "the great house" as a larger private home where "games" were being played and then it goes on to say "so DirtyHand was discovered".

"But the sacrifice will be offered before the dirty hand sings", perhaps Joran was offered up to spend time in jail so that the father didn't have to play any more of his cards (cards that he'd played?? or someone else to not get his home search?) and "sing". 'He will return to babylon, broken but anonymous".

The way this is coming down...  all this PR isn't great for the financial future of the family in the long run. Notice how Shango doesn't capitalize "Babylon" as he did previously... a hint that returning to a Holland is not the same as he knew it before?

If it was played out in a coverup as planned, ie: which was going on when Shango wrote, then at that time, IMO, any of the "DirtyHands or dirtyhands" could have had the chance to continue more undercover... before so much of the continued persistence of Natalee's family, the Scared Monkeys, Jossy et al and the boycott really started in full steam.

As Shango said "Aruba is preserved and Babylon (notice the capitals) will pay the price".

Keep remembering the time in which this was written.

Do we have a few English teachers that could go over this? I think he is using subtle hints in where we should look in his use and play with the meanings of words with the use capitals and small letters.

even in "Plain View" and plain view

Is Dompig Arubian by birth or by heritage? I just wondered, When I was reading "DirtyHand is not an Arawak". Of course neither would be the Dutch, any Americans there or others of different birth or Shange could use the use of country origin as being one's heritage too.

Who was the government official that was pictured at the rave parties and had a tickle site?  I just thought of that as being kind of odd. Seems to me he was also trying to explain  many times on TV, "why we just didn't understand THEIR SYSTEM" just like Arlene S, cousin of GW used to.

Does someone have the post that discusses Paul van der Sloot's role in the evidence, court case of Mathews? Seems to me that wasn't all above board also and Mr. Volking (King) was part of that too? Who were the Judges in Aruba at the time and some of the other movers and shakers. It takes time to get one's hands dirty.

Some Monkeys talk of the Mafia. IMO still think if they were involved this would or will take another avenue to be resolved.... not always in blunt force. but very subtle but quick ways. This current PR certainly doesn't help the business/financial interests and survival of Aruba and its interested parties. IMO

Klaas do you, perhaps, have a jpeg of my little impy avatar? Hard drive went down.. thought I had him backed up. TIA   IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:22:29 AM
Capital letters and small letters are indeed significant.

DirtyHand, Dirty Hand, dirty hand

DirtyHand = Posner

IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:24:47 AM
IMO

Posner sent Guido to NL.
Posner paid for Guido's very expensive lawyer.

IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:26:56 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Capital letters and small letters are indeed significant.

DirtyHand, Dirty Hand, dirty hand

DirtyHand = Posner

IMO


I'm not trying to get into the whole Shango translation. I just wanted to show that DirtyHand is Posner. IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 03:33:38 AM
I also have an idea of who Shango is, and it ain't Gabe Leo.


Title: Rumour
Post by: IBE on December 02, 2006, 03:34:09 AM
Rumour or rumor:

Heh Heh... for all the Good Monkeys, Worldwide!

Anyway, was anything ever found out more on the rumor that there were elders at Paulus' home that night playing poker? I thought Anita has said that?? Help... memory fades.

What a web would be woven if it were true and that these were his givernmental friends when "something bad happened" in another part of the home or with someone else in the family and they were there to hear about it first hand after it happened?

What a run-on sentence I just did! But I hope you get the context.

Night all... Keep up the Good Work

IBE

PS Just because Masons take an oath, as many of us do when we take oaths in our work or in our volunteer work or at our church to God every Sunday doesn't mean we support anyone of the group whom we find are not ethical. It boils down, IMO, that I am the one who has to face God alone. It's not a group function. (diddly darn)

Those who harm a group or a religion or a person before finding/ knowing what it/he/she stands for or those in it, should go hide in a Mason jar and put it in the oven.

End of soap box. Thanks for listening. I don't rant here often.


Title: Memphis
Post by: IBE on December 02, 2006, 03:36:30 AM
Memphis

HI !!!! I love seeing you! We always seem to be the last ones up.

If you live on the East Coast then you can't sleep? I live opposite and can't either.


Title: Good Night
Post by: IBE on December 02, 2006, 03:41:33 AM
Well, good night. Have big day tomorrow opps already today.

Whomever Dirty Hand is, I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of him or her, but still not in the pocket either.

Nite Nite

I have a painting of one beautiful fall leaf (miss the fall colors) and it says "Leaf me alone". Kind of neat at times.

I feel at home with the Monkeys though!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: dkpen on December 02, 2006, 04:57:11 AM
Slippers: Flips Flops. or maybe Joran had a cut on his foot/feet and could not wear regular shoes. And it's very easy to walk around all day in Flip FLops. Especially in tropical areas. Here in Florida in summer months it's practically all I wear. ALso, they had to dispose of evidence so no tennis shoes/K-swiss?

Mason: Maybe a mason who works with concrete. As in pouring concrete around Sloots pool?

Rammstient: He gets very upset and overly portective about the Dutch Judicial system and the laws there within.



Off to bed, have sweet dreams and G'night/G'morning.

God bless~

[/u]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 05:02:00 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.

.


There is the subject of the MISSING CONFESSION that took place after the allowable interrogation hour of 10 PM.  We KNOW that JVDS places ALL blame on OTHERS, so I can hear the story now, can't you??????  The subhuman JVDS tells that a "jealous" Guido did the dirty deed.  PVDS had prepared ALL involved to UNDERSTAND that "ONE WITNESS IS NO WITNESS"  no matter what JVDS declares JUST DENY.  All the while PVDS is planting reasonable doubt with all his internet propagandists who are active to this day, many who are bankrolled through AHATA.

This makes sense to me.  The plan has been at work from DAY ONE, 5/30/05.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 05:07:39 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Joran may be bisexual or even fully gay. He most certainly is sexually opportunistic.


Really, really well stated.  A TAKER, always on the receiving end.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 02, 2006, 07:12:56 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/swa1.png)

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/dasporterbeaho.png)

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/3ed.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 08:09:18 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "Anna"
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.

.


There is the subject of the MISSING CONFESSION that took place after the allowable interrogation hour of 10 PM.  We KNOW that JVDS places ALL blame on OTHERS, so I can hear the story now, can't you??????  The subhuman JVDS tells that a "jealous" Guido did the dirty deed.  PVDS had prepared ALL involved to UNDERSTAND that "ONE WITNESS IS NO WITNESS"  no matter what JVDS declares JUST DENY. All the while PVDS is planting reasonable doubt with all his internet propagandists who are active to this day, many who are bankrolled through AHATA.

This makes sense to me.  The plan has been at work from DAY ONE, 5/30/05.


Very interesting. Can you expand more on the part in bold? Did Joran mess up that plan?

If I understand what you're saying, that might be the "other card that was played and lost".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: sharon on December 02, 2006, 08:13:35 AM
fwiw Memphis

I've always interpreted the statement

"one witness is no witness" because the 'witness' is a SUSPECT.

Again -- fwiw.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: blah on December 02, 2006, 08:16:56 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA:  Are you aware of de Vries doing a followup?

JOSSY:  Yes, I think he will be doing a followup.

DANA:  Is it true that Joran had more than a platonic relationship with Guido.

JOSSY:  Yes, there is a statement to that affect.  I think it's in Guido's statement.

JOSSY:  There is that possibility that Guido is involved.

JOSSY:  I have a video tape of Gerald Dompig that they do have sufficient material to bring these boys in on kidnapping and rape.  Which would be 8 years imprisonment.




HMMMMMMM

is this just their statements or is there some physical evidence?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2006, 08:18:54 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
guido buried the sneakers and used his 4 wheeler, took em way out and buried em  8)

Very possible


I am so confused now!! :cry:

Hello all!! Haven't posted in eons!! School is in now and I am back to my old schedule, bed at 9pm, up at 5am...but I've been checking in.
Missed you all!!

So, seems to me that it is possible that Guido gave Joran a ride home, but from where? If it seems crime scene was VS home, where did he need a ride home from? Are you all thinking he needed a ride home from dropping off Natalee's body somewhere after?

Would you then come home and watch a 2 hour porn movie if you just murdered someone and buried them???!!! I don't know? I always assumed if Natalee died at the sloot home, she was not buried until the next day. And if it was Guido who gave Joran the ride home...then how does the gardners testimony fit in?

I know I am way behind but can someone update me on the current theories with this new info? And if Guido is now in picture, and k2's are out...why then does Jossy have tape saying have enough to convict all 3 on kidnapping and rape? I am totally lost as to how it all fits together now!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 02, 2006, 08:24:13 AM
Sue wrote:   "it isn't who you know but who you BLOW on that island"
-
That brings up an interesting question; who else did Guido Wever "know" in the biblical sense?  Is it possible that there is a very powerful man who is homosexual and wants to keep Guido quiet?  Posner? Lorenzo van Rijn?
One of the judges?
The menage a trois of two men and one woman does involve homosexual overtones.  
Slippers would refer to any shoes that are slip-on and do not have shoelaces.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: ldstlou on December 02, 2006, 08:27:20 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Memphis, my husband hypothesizes that Natalee was taken to the Holiday Inn, that they "did" take her back to the HI, and that she was "drugged and stumbling" when they took her.  She was taken through a secret "maze," by Guido and Joran who would know where that secret maze is and out of the peering eyes of any MB students or others.  He believes whatever happened to her, happened at the HI.  Bear in mind that one of the Arubans who posted quite heavily early on went to the HI and said there was a scant number of cameras and she found, herself, that only 1-2 was working.  So it is possible that a camera was not in the location of or was not working where they took her, or a security person was paid to deactivate the cameras.  He also believes that the HI part is right, but when Posner got wind of it, he sent Paulus or someone in to tell the jail birds they best change their stories and keep their "crap" away from the HI and he, thus, fired Guido for getting involved, but helped him cover his tracks. He also believes the mattress that was bloody was from the HI and it was Natalee's blood and the reason rooms at the HI were re-carpeted.

We heard Beth alude to the fact that her conversations on the phones were bugged and that she had Posner call her inquiring as to when she was going to leave Aruba, etc.


ok...this makes sense...but then why the big deal about not searching the whole vs house?


Title: It's winter!
Post by: Leslie on December 02, 2006, 08:27:44 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Big trouble on a little island
Post by: Leslie on December 02, 2006, 08:40:24 AM
A meeting with the governor today
Chaotic demonstration against bbo

Protesters broke through the barriers that the police have put up to prevent the people from getting too close to the entrance of the Government office.

Minister Nilo Swaen (MEP) of Finance accept<ed> the petition with almost 11.000 signatures from Marlon Pieters, the organizer of the protest action against the bbo.

ORANJESTAD – The manifestation against the introduction of the new taxation on the turnover of businesses in Aruba went very chaotic yesterday.  The police had put up barriers to prevent the protesters from getting too close to the entrance of the Government office.  But these barriers were broken.   The police had trouble keeping the protestors away from the entrance, but they managed.  Despite the difficulties, organizer Marlon Pieters is pleased with the turnout.  An estimate of 700 people took part.  

Pieters is also pleased with the almost 11.000 people that signed the petition against the sales tax.  “The emotions were hot, and that was also bad for me, because I am also a police officer.  But we managed to give the government the petition and that’s what we came for.”  

The protestors all dressed in black, holding posters imaging crying people with texts ‘No more, how much more can the people endure?’ gathered at 15:00 at the Juliana School and the protest march, accompanied by sad music started at 16:30.  This made it look more like a funeral than a manifestation.

The protestors were complaining about not being able to survive with the income they have.  Everything in the supermarkets is very expensive.  100 Florins won’t buy you the necessities any longer.  Aruba is becoming the same as the many Latin American countries that have also introduced such tax: no longer a place to live, says a young woman from Guatemala that immigrated to Aruba.  

The protestors arrived at the government office, but the barriers kept them about 15 meters from the entrance to the building.  But led by AVP-leader Mike Eman they pushed the barriers and shouted ‘Let’s go inside’.  All of this to the dissatisfaction of Marlon Pieters that was trying to keep the people calm.  But due to the big masses of people, he fell and people almost stepped over him.  He managed to jump up fast and for a moment he was afraid that the people would manage to go inside the building.  Pieters and Andin Bikker, who supported the manifestation as leader of PDR had to have the gift of the gab in order to calm the people.  Bikker doesn’t think that the government will mind the manifestation.  “The bbo will be introduced.  This action won’t stop that.  But this is the last chance that the government gets to postpone the bbo, before the unions paralyze Aruba.  The government will have to assume her responsibility, when it comes to this.  We have done our best as political parties.”  

Finance-minister Nilo Swaen (MEP) came out under police protection to accept the petition from Pieters.  He said that he will give a reaction on the petition.  That’s all Pieters wanted, hand over the petition.  But that was apparently not enough for Eman.  He demanded that Nelson Oduber comes out also.  He gave him one hour to do so, and when after an hour the premier didn’t, he incited the people to stay where they are until the government come with a reaction.  

Of the 700 people only 100 were still present around 19:30.  The police and Pieters tried to convince Eman to terminate the manifestation and send the people home.  But he was still not satisfied and demanded this time a conversation with the governor.  He received a confirmation from the governor that he will meet with a delegation the next day at 10:00.  

He then put an end to the manifestation, but some people refused to go home. Minister Swaen will have a conversation with the unions about bbo on Monday.  The unions didn’t take part in the manifestation. They are considering a national strike.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 02, 2006, 09:20:58 AM
Jossy says...

***********************************

klaas writes:

1. KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007

2. Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying they have enough evidence to arrest and convict JK2 of rape and kidnapping which would put them in jail for 8 years.

3. There is a witness statement where it's stated that Joran and Guido had more than a platonic relationship. Jossy believes it was in Guido's earlier witness statements.

4. Jossy believes it may have been Ben Vocking that stopped them from searching the entire Sloot residence.

************************************

So, all three, according to Dompig can be arrested for kidnapping and rape, yet the prosecutor does nothing.

And there's a statement indicating that joran and guido do more than play tennis together.  Now that's great.

Where's jossy been with this kidnapping/rape info -- seems like it should have been a headline a while ago?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: blah on December 02, 2006, 10:00:38 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Jossy says...

***********************************

klaas writes:

1. KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007

2. Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying they have enough evidence to arrest and convict JK2 of rape and kidnapping which would put them in jail for 8 years.

3. There is a witness statement where it's stated that Joran and Guido had more than a platonic relationship. Jossy believes it was in Guido's earlier witness statements.

4. Jossy believes it may have been Ben Vocking that stopped them from searching the entire Sloot residence.

************************************

So, all three, according to Dompig can be arrested for kidnapping and rape, yet the prosecutor does nothing.

And there's a statement indicating that joran and guido do more than play tennis together.  Now that's great.

Where's jossy been with this kidnapping/rape info -- seems like it should have been a headline a while ago?

.


what evidence of rape is there other than their statements?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Rob on December 02, 2006, 10:03:49 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Jossy says...

***********************************

klaas writes:

1. KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007

2. Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying they have enough evidence to arrest and convict JK2 of rape and kidnapping which would put them in jail for 8 years.

3. There is a witness statement where it's stated that Joran and Guido had more than a platonic relationship. Jossy believes it was in Guido's earlier witness statements.

4. Jossy believes it may have been Ben Vocking that stopped them from searching the entire Sloot residence.

************************************

So, all three, according to Dompig can be arrested for kidnapping and rape, yet the prosecutor does nothing.

And there's a statement indicating that joran and guido do more than play tennis together.  Now that's great.

Where's jossy been with this kidnapping/rape info -- seems like it should have been a headline a while ago?

.


what evidence of rape is there other than their statements?


You ll find out around 12-15-2006.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 10:12:16 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "Anna"
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.

.


There is the subject of the MISSING CONFESSION that took place after the allowable interrogation hour of 10 PM.  We KNOW that JVDS places ALL blame on OTHERS, so I can hear the story now, can't you??????  The subhuman JVDS tells that a "jealous" Guido did the dirty deed.  PVDS had prepared ALL involved to UNDERSTAND that "ONE WITNESS IS NO WITNESS"  no matter what JVDS declares JUST DENY.  All the while PVDS is planting reasonable doubt with all his internet propagandists who are active to this day, many who are bankrolled through AHATA.

This makes sense to me.  The plan has been at work from DAY ONE, 5/30/05.


Memphis,  I could see JVDS on 6/10/05 telling the ALE interrogator's that Guido, in a jealous rage, beat NH to a pulp as JVDS received scratches while he tried to stop Guido.  JVDS left assuming that NH would recover & only Guido knows the location of NH.  Now we have been informed that PVDS was given Guido's phone # "the LIE is to confirm JVDS gambling winnings but" in PVDS MO we can safely assume it was to inform Guido that NO MATTER WHAT may be said in the future & by whom he is to deny & proclaim his lack of knowledge, having an alibi & proclaim his innocence.  Of course, I believe that it is JVDS who did so seriously harm NH, I don't know if there were any witnesses to the act, it is only sure that he did somehow inform the K2 that NH had been injured.  Up til now I think the fix is in because only JVDS & PVDS were involved in the injury & resulting death & the location of the remains.  This is why there has been no claim for the reward, only the guilty KNOW & it is their plan to make more than the reward by their disgusting book of lies & proclamation of how they are such good people & have been so victimized.  ANYBODY WHO BELIEVES THAT IS IN A MISERABLE STATE OF MENTAL ILLNESS & REALLY BELONGS SEEKING PROFESSIONAL HELP WITH THEIR $$$$'S, PASS UP THE GIVING of $$$$'S TO THE MURDERER'S.

Those who will be profitting from the publication of VDS propaganda should be ascertained & if the VDS's are in the group & in the event that Beth Holloway Twitty has the opportunity to address the people of the Netherlands I would appeal to her to take a strong position against this BOOK OF LIES & PURPOSEFUL DECEIPTION.  If the VDS's are profitting than it is a continuation of their thievery from others.  Mr. DeVries spoke just recently of his contacting the author of this upcoming book giving it free publicity & keeping the author's confidentiality adding that little bit of intrigue.  Hopefully the decent Dutch population will not be made fools of by these creatures who are so far from being decent it is revolting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 10:13:13 AM
Hi Rob!

Why do you say 12/15?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 10:17:16 AM
I followed the case of Laci Peterson & can recall that the sperm & egg donor's of the murderer wanted to publish a book of lies & NO PUBLISHER came forward with a deal for them as ALL THE PUBLISHERS KNEW THERE WOULD BE NO MARKET FOR THE LIES UTTERED BY SUPPORTER'S OF A MURDERER.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: blah on December 02, 2006, 10:20:33 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Jossy says...

***********************************

klaas writes:

1. KJ is leaving her position January 1, 2007

2. Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying they have enough evidence to arrest and convict JK2 of rape and kidnapping which would put them in jail for 8 years.

3. There is a witness statement where it's stated that Joran and Guido had more than a platonic relationship. Jossy believes it was in Guido's earlier witness statements.

4. Jossy believes it may have been Ben Vocking that stopped them from searching the entire Sloot residence.

************************************

So, all three, according to Dompig can be arrested for kidnapping and rape, yet the prosecutor does nothing.

And there's a statement indicating that joran and guido do more than play tennis together.  Now that's great.

Where's jossy been with this kidnapping/rape info -- seems like it should have been a headline a while ago?

.


what evidence of rape is there other than their statements?


You ll find out around 12-15-2006.


hey Rob, LTNS !!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: blah on December 02, 2006, 10:21:25 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Hi Rob!

Why do you say 12/15?


is that the date the judge is supposed to have a decision by?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2006, 10:28:47 AM
Hi Rob

Please explain.

Carlo and SG
We know there was a report (to a SG) from a couple north of the hotels that saw two men forcing a women somewhere (from other security guard statement).  Maybe Carlo also knew this report and was trying to find out if it was the security guards who the couple reported incident to.

I think Marriott was more involved than HI. I just think everybody knew we could get info on Posner so he became the easier mislead.
For Shango people: Hadn't we discussed the 7 levels of inferno and the 46th something as being Marriott 7 floors and listed as 46th hotel on Aruba tourism site??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 02, 2006, 10:32:29 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Unless KJ has totally flipped her wig, which is also a distinct possibility, there should be some reason why she applied this heavy battery to only Guido and not even to Joran.

Also remember that little curly headed kid who was always attached to Joran in the NL and even went to NY with Joran for the interview?  The one attached like velcro?  That relationship always looked very strange as well.


Is this kid with Joran...KEES?
Looks to me he answered the door to De Vries & looked out of the window.

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/netherlands-1.jpg)
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/joran-served.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 10:33:34 AM
Wasn't there mention of a hotel room or hospitality room catching fire in a hotel room shortly after 5/30/05?  Does anybody remember which hotel?  In my mind the Marriott comes up but I am not sure of that at all, as it has been such a long time ago & of course my computer experienced a complete crash.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 02, 2006, 10:36:47 AM
In the list of hotels the 46th is the Wyndham

Posner stayed at the Holiday Inn
on the 7th floor for a few years
(The Penthouse...)  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2006, 10:39:59 AM
Quote from: "Florida"
In the list of hotels the 46th is the Wyndham

Posner stayed at the Holiday Inn
on the 7th floor for a few years
(The Penthouse...)  :?


Thanks Florida.

I think in the one message (from Joran to Kees), Kees is described as mulatto.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 10:46:12 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "memphis"
Aruba is mob controlled and Holland knows it. Somehow what happened would expose it all. Holland knows and is part of the coverup. I hope that doesn't include DeVries.


I don't think everybody is bad in Holland.  That's like saying everyone from Alabama is toothless.


I agree.  There are many good Dutch, I'm sure.  DeVries is just an example, but we've also heard from Dutch and Aruban posters who aren't wearing blinders.   We should remember how people criticize all Americans because of a few, because of crime, drugs, arrogance, war, corruption, and government ineptitude.  I'd prefer not to do the same to others.  

I also want to point out that while Posner runs the Excelsior and we have some suspicions of his involvement, there are other mean nasty people doing business in Aruba and other islands in the Caribbean.  IIRC the Russian mob has/had some banks there, and South American drug dealers run their wares through many islands in the Caribbean.  Let's not rule out mean nasty types that aren't the US mob.  

Oh, and Good Morning Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 10:50:30 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Tom looks after that, Im sure he will have it on the page in the morning.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


I was only able to listen to part of the show, so I'll catch the podcast.  Just wanted to thank Dana for another great show, and also thank his guests for taking some time to talk to us!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 10:51:51 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
I also have an idea of who Shango is, and it ain't Gabe Leo.
:wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 10:53:40 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Sue wrote:   "it isn't who you know but who you BLOW on that island"
-
That brings up an interesting question; who else did Guido Wever "know" in the biblical sense?  Is it possible that there is a very powerful man who is homosexual and wants to keep Guido quiet?  Posner? Lorenzo van Rijn?
One of the judges?
The menage a trois of two men and one woman does involve homosexual overtones.  
Slippers would refer to any shoes that are slip-on and do not have shoelaces.

I think the slippers were because Joran had a cut on his foot.  I think Paulus brought Joran a slipper that looked like this:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/ADIDASSLIPPER.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 02, 2006, 10:53:40 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "memphis"
I also have an idea of who Shango is, and it ain't Gabe Leo.
:wink:


Who?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 11:01:09 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Sue wrote:   "it isn't who you know but who you BLOW on that island"
-
That brings up an interesting question; who else did Guido Wever "know" in the biblical sense?  Is it possible that there is a very powerful man who is homosexual and wants to keep Guido quiet?  Posner? Lorenzo van Rijn?
One of the judges?
The menage a trois of two men and one woman does involve homosexual overtones.  
Slippers would refer to any shoes that are slip-on and do not have shoelaces.

I think the slippers were because Joran had a cut on his foot.  I think Paulus brought Joran a slipper that looked like this:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/ADIDASSLIPPER.jpg)


OR THIS:

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/ADIDASSLIPPER2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2006, 11:06:56 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Hi Rob!

Why do you say 12/15?



Sorry..I have not had time to read back a few pages...is this "Rob" from BFN?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 11:07:32 AM
Has Peaches checked in this morning? I am concerned - Peaches please let us know how you are, I'm so sorry this chemo is causing you bone pain. {{{HUGS}}}

I think Rob meant there would be more information released around the 15th of this month, I've heard nothing of a court hearing.

Leslie-
Thank you for bringing forth the article regarding the protest, interesting the less poweful citizens of Aruba are stating publicly how much more can we take? Sounds like trickle-down.....

I also want to say that knowing more of the details of Guido finally explains to me, without saying what the rumors have been of some of the Aruban's and even american's posting against truth do for a living/vocation, it does finally explain why they were here and why so soon. It also explains the myriad of malcontents that show up on this board to create dissension and havoc, Aruba has some nefarious characters with some high-profit dirty secrets.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 11:17:46 AM
Call-out to Sunfreak as well, hope you are okay, please let us know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:17:52 AM
Well I will probably get flamed all to hell for saying/asking this but if Rob knows that we are definately going to know on 12/15 then he should just say it... I hate the cryptic stuff and it's why Red doesn't say I know but can't tell... blah, blah, blah.....

no offense Rob, I just hate the dangling carrot approach....


It's like me telling y'all that I know why jossy didn't mention the video before, but I can't say...

no one wants hear that.... we have all worked way too hard to hear that stuff....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 11:19:26 AM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Hi Rob!

Why do you say 12/15?



Sorry..I have not had time to read back a few pages...is this "Rob" from BFN?

Yes, but he was originally from Scared Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:23:17 AM
hello my name is Robots


i have bones like IRON and blood like MERCURY
and i hate all of em


more each day  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: tcumom on December 02, 2006, 11:27:45 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Well I will probably get flamed all to hell for saying/asking this but if Rob knows that we are definately going to know on 12/15 then he should just say it... I hate the cryptic stuff and it's why Red doesn't say I know but can't tell... blah, blah, blah.....

no offense Rob, I just hate the dangling carrot approach....


It's like me telling y'all that I know why jossy didn't mention the video before, but I can't say...

no one wants hear that.... we have all worked way too hard to hear that stuff....


Hi and Happy Saturday to all the monkeys!  

Mrs. Red ~ I'm glad to see Rob back in the cage ~ AND, I completely agree with you and the dangling carrot comment ~ I wish he would just say what's happening.

I'll also say that I watch others do that, and always feel left out of the loop, as a few do catch on via *winks*  and *grins*.......so I guess that means it's not a dangling carrot after all if a few get it.  Oh well, I'm rambling and making no sense.  Back to lurking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:36:27 AM
Hi Mom... Rob is welcome anytime he feels like talking to us.  I agree that some of the conversations that are obviously off the board do the same thing at times......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 11:39:31 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Well I will probably get flamed all to hell for saying/asking this but if Rob knows that we are definately going to know on 12/15 then he should just say it... I hate the cryptic stuff and it's why Red doesn't say I know but can't tell... blah, blah, blah.....

no offense Rob, I just hate the dangling carrot approach....


It's like me telling y'all that I know why jossy didn't mention the video before, but I can't say...

no one wants hear that.... we have all worked way too hard to hear that stuff....


Thank you for saying it before I did!  I think Rob loves and craves the attention he gets for his little tidbits.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:41:52 AM
joran had someone spend the night at his house
i think it was freddie

thats who was watching the porn movies at 3-4 am

joran had to get home to go to bed because he has school the next day
 :roll: LOAD OF BULL !!!!


joran and guido then went out to take care of business :evil:


guido left the island because he KNOWS what went on...

cause he was there

joran told everyone K2 brought him home.. they DID NOT
it was joran's way of LINKING them as suspects


simple as huckleberry pie

she is buried.

If TOILET POLICE would  
get off their FAT ASSES this could be solved


Title: guido
Post by: Cat on December 02, 2006, 11:44:31 AM
How do we know that Guido is gay.hmmmmmmmm,maybe the sthesuspects told the world.His behavior is very suspiuos,at best.I know about the study on faces,look at J.W.Gacy,J.Dahmer,Wayne williams,etc.I have felt that jdvs is Guilty.CAT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:45:05 AM
if people die because they overdosed then the body would be right there
and joran and K2 would be able to say hey, she was drunk and doing drugs

the body was hidden because of the evidence on the body

the evidence would show it was not a SIMPLE case of drugs and alcohol overdose

DOMPIG is a JERK

JORAN is a killer and rapist



simple as bluebery pie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:47:28 AM
guido leaves the country

probably afraid he will end up in a cave ON FIRE

doused with gasoline  


ALE will call it a suicide
 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 11:48:00 AM
I don't like it and in fact I hate it when little tidbits and secrets are
hinted at. By anyone.
These dangling carrots are a tease and as far as I am concerned they are in the same category as Joran saying, someday I will tell you the whole story, but right now, I am not ready.
So, what are we to do, sit here in anticipation waiting for more hints, clues and cryptic messages ?
..
I am not going to fall for any more of that kind of nonsense. And any one who posts that stuff has zero credibility with me.
..
And Rob, what is the point of doing this ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:48:18 AM
Robots, I agree....but I have to wonder how/why the K2 went through all of this for no reason...... they are heavily involved as well... maybe the dirty little secret is that there are about 10 or 15 PIMPS that have been doing this for years... what I truly wish is that some of the girls that have had their drink drugged would come forward... but let's face it, everyone sees and knows the dirty little secret... it's why there are empty beaches


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:51:54 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Robots, I agree....but I have to wonder how/why the K2 went through all of this for no reason...... they are heavily involved as well... maybe the dirty little secret is that there are about 10 or 15 PIMPS that have been doing this for years... what I truly wish is that some of the girls that have had their drink drugged would come forward... but let's face it, everyone sees and knows the dirty little secret... it's why there are empty beaches


well, K2 were duped --i think

initially, to help their FRIEND they lied because they did not know the WHOLE STORY, that Natalee was killed.

im not giving them a free pass, by any means

but, if a friend asked them to just go along with the story and the friend will tell them the REST of the story later... they might have said "OK"

because they did not realize HOW UGLY the situation had gotten

i agree. they have done this before and the results were not like they were this time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 11:51:59 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Special thanks to Jossy for dropping a couple of bombshells tonight.

1) KJ leaving ... getting out of Dodge. Are any of the original usual suspects still in Aruba?

2) So Jossy has a tape of Dompig making some comments about the case. Wonder what else the tape has on it? ;)   :roll:
Was wondering when this was going to be said, glad Jossy used SM to get it out.


Wonder what else is on the tape.  :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2006, 11:53:02 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Well I will probably get flamed all to hell for saying/asking this but if Rob knows that we are definately going to know on 12/15 then he should just say it... I hate the cryptic stuff and it's why Red doesn't say I know but can't tell... blah, blah, blah.....

no offense Rob, I just hate the dangling carrot approach....


It's like me telling y'all that I know why jossy didn't mention the video before, but I can't say...

no one wants hear that.... we have all worked way too hard to hear that stuff....



lmfao @ mrs. red....flamed to hell, lol...sorry...had to LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 11:57:24 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Robots, I agree....but I have to wonder how/why the K2 went through all of this for no reason...... they are heavily involved as well... maybe the dirty little secret is that there are about 10 or 15 PIMPS that have been doing this for years... what I truly wish is that some of the girls that have had their drink drugged would come forward... but let's face it, everyone sees and knows the dirty little secret... it's why there are empty beaches


I agree MrsR. We know what they've been up to.

I think K2 are guilty of kidnapping and rape. I think Joran & Guido are guilty of murder.

Guido was wisked off the Island. He has been kept out of the news. Guido's alibi is that he was at work and could not have done it (see timeline). Guido was not at work. Posner is his alibi. Posner is saying he was at work.

I'll add, Altruist brought up an interesting theory about the missing statement. Wonder if Joran did implicate Guido.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 12:00:07 PM
I am sitting here before I have things to do, readin here. LISTENING TO DANA IN THE POP UP MODE.Coffee. Easy chair, Kitty Kat snuggling on my lap, other Kitty Kat sitting on the arm of the easy chair.
KOOL .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 12:02:00 PM
Well I don't intend to choose sides in this one, I posted what I did for I've heard of these videos from another source <not Rob> for some time now. I guess my thought is feeling better about that information for having heard it from Jossy finally last night on SM radio, then hearing it from my source, now to see Rob post about it?

Flaming seems to be the new sport lately, I just wish it was uniformly applied. Whenever I state an opinion or even tire of the games, I get roasted and burned at the stake in the lounge.

So Mrs I agree it's high time for the games to cease, for everyone to work on one team, but the issue also seems to be who is on what team?

I'm on team Natalee. I also have tried to contribute as much as I possibly could to this board, it may not have been as much as others, but I have consistently tried. I have also consistently thanked Tom, Red, Mrs, Klaas for the opportunity to participate here.

Rant over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 12:05:05 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Y'all have to remember that you can listen to Dana later... download the podcast...


I am so behind this woman and her case... I don't think that rape should carry a two year statute of limitations... it's just not right.


Good morning.  Of course, I slept right on through last nite and missed Dana.  I did catch O'Reilly and Geraldo talking about Natalee's case.  Bill is right on the money.  The gov't never meant for the case to be solved.  I love BOR.  I believe he is a good guy with a big heart.  I bet he does good deeds that nobody ever hears about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 12:08:54 PM
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 12:10:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA:   Was the search warrent changed on the spot?

JOSSY:  The search warrent was changed.  When they went to the house the first time Ben Vocking was there, employee of the department of prosecution.  Vocking had no business being there and used his influence to change the search warrent.


I don't know the legalities of this, but it's not standard procedure.  So while JoeT was rambling about Antonio Carlo being a highly respected attorney and no defense counsel would ever do such a thing, I wanted to slap Greta and get her to say something like "We've already seen that they don't always do things in accordance with proper or standard legal procedure, Joe."  Then I wanted her to say, "Are you telling me, Joe, that there are never any back room meetings or information leaks in the US?"  Also, JoeT, while accusing deVries of lying about Carlo to make money off of his poor innocent scared client, didn't even consider the possibility that maybe someone else was lying - Janssen or Carlo!  That's where Joe loses credibility and I'm glad O'Reilly talked about the search warrant being changed at the time it was executed.  JoeT said the police acted in accordance with a court ordered search warrant - not adding that judicial officials who are friends of Paulus were at the scene and changed it then.  Why, Paulus?  I can't believe it was just because Anita didn't want the police going through her underwear drawer.  She's shown that underwear on US and Aruban TV for goodness sakes!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 12:13:43 PM
if the police were allowed to search the main house they would have found SHOVELS that were used recently

and dirty clothes
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 12:14:30 PM
When JoeT made that comment about DeVries doing the show on Joran for the money, I wanted to scream.  I seriously don't believe DeVries recieved any more money than his normal paycheck from the network.  If anyone's in this for the money and exposure, it's JOET!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 12:16:31 PM
Guys, can someone please post the fake Natalee and Joran photo? TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 12:16:40 PM
quick JORAN

"go hide the shovels, the police are here"


"ooooohhhhhhhhh  dont worry JORAN, my buddy is here"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 12:16:46 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Y'all have to remember that you can listen to Dana later... download the podcast...


I am so behind this woman and her case... I don't think that rape should carry a two year statute of limitations... it's just not right.


Good morning.  Of course, I slept right on through last nite and missed Dana.  I did catch O'Reilly and Geraldo talking about Natalee's case.  Bill is right on the money.  The gov't never meant for the case to be solved.  I love BOR.  I believe he is a good guy with a big heart.  I bet he does good deeds that nobody ever hears about.


I completely agree, Mrs. Red.  The nature of a rape is such that there are many reasons why a victim might delay reporting or proceding with charges.  Also, the violent nature of the crime is such that a 2 year statute of limitations is outrageous.  At least this case has brought that fact to the fore and should give it some attention.  That's how changes come to pass.  

Peaches, I hope you're feeling better.  {{{Peaches}}}
BOR, while I often disagree and don't like his outbursts, is a tough cookie and I like his no-nonsense approach.  I also remember how uncomfortable JoeT was on his show when Bill asked him who was paying him for representing Joran.  JoeT was mad that Bill was bringing it up.  Doesn't surprise me that he came out with info about the search warrant.  Gotta love the guy for things like that.  You can e-mail him at oreilly@foxnews.com if you want to tell him.   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 12:18:35 PM
Quote from: "robots"
if the police were allowed to search the main house they would have found SHOVELS that were used recently

and dirty clothes
 8)

It makes you wonder what was in the place.
If there was nothing there, why not let the police search as in the signed search warrant ?
And Ben Vocking sticking his neck out ? And the judge being there. Was the judge there with Ben Vocking when they swooped in on the SG residences ? NO, of course not.
Most of us are reasonable ppl. We can connect these dots. Who else was there ? KJ, was Dompig there ? Jan ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 12:19:31 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "robots"
if the police were allowed to search the main house they would have found SHOVELS that were used recently

and dirty clothes
 8)

It makes you wonder what was in the place.
If there was nothing there, why not let the police search as in the signed search warrant ?
And Ben Vocking sticking his neck out ? And the judge being there. Was the judge there with Ben Vocking when they swooped in on the SG residences ? NO, of course not.
Most of us are reasonable ppl. We can connect these dots. Who else was there ? KJ, was Dompig there ? Jan ?



 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 12:19:54 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When JoeT made that comment about DeVries doing the show on Joran for the money, I wanted to scream.  I seriously don't believe DeVries recieved any more money than his normal paycheck from the network.  If anyone's in this for the money and exposure, it's JOET!!!!!


I've been hearing that same garbage about Beth and Greta and Jossy and Art and.......since this case started.  Everyone who isn't a Joran, Aruba, van der Sloot fan is in it for the money.  JoeT and Julie are just in it for truth and justice ya know.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 12:20:34 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Another thing that has always bothered me is Joran saying he put his gym bag behind the bar at the racquetclub after showering and changing clothes and putting on SLIPPERS.

Then Paulus says he took the bag to Joran later than Joran claims to have put the bag behind the bar at the club.  Why would Joran change into SLIPPERS for we have seen him enter the casino in sneakers before.

Were the sneakers in the bag behind the bar or did Paulus bring them to the club for disposal?  Is that when Guido got them?

There is something very off on the timeline as well as Joran's activities that evening with these Slippers when he was planning a rather long walk to the casino.

.


I always felt the term "slippers" meant something else to JVDS.  Maybe sneakers.  I know I think bedroom slippers but that may not be the local understanding of the term "slippers".  Does that make sense?  I am way behind and just commenting as I go.  
It's a beautiful day here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 12:21:03 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Well I don't intend to choose sides in this one, I posted what I did for I've heard of these videos from another source <not Rob> for some time now. I guess my thought is feeling better about that information for having heard it from Jossy finally last night on SM radio, then hearing it from my source, now to see Rob post about it?

Flaming seems to be the new sport lately, I just wish it was uniformly applied. Whenever I state an opinion or even tire of the games, I get roasted and burned at the stake in the lounge.

So Mrs I agree it's high time for the games to cease, for everyone to work on one team, but the issue also seems to be who is on what team?

I'm on team Natalee. I also have tried to contribute as much as I possibly could to this board, it may not have been as much as others, but I have consistently tried. I have also consistently thanked Tom, Red, Mrs, Klaas for the opportunity to participate here.

Rant over.


This is my last post on the subject....  there arent' sides to take IMO.  I simply stated that to come in and say that on 12/15 we will know is a dangling carrot and people deserve better... and I do think that.  

No where did I imply that anyone didn't know or was lying about the videos... yes, I have heard before etc... my point is that I would never come in the forum and say I know something you don't know.... that is what I object to.  

If you can't tell it all... then please don't tell - it's that simple. Because if you can't tell it all... then chances are you shouldn't be telling any of it.

As for the fighting.. well life is too short and too precious for getting angry over emails or posts that I don't agree with... it's a very simple proposition for me.  My theory about that holds just like my theory on reading the refugees... it won't change their minds and I don't have the time.  There are  too many wonderful people here that I don't focus on the negatives... too many great minds and too many caring people to worry about those that choose to be assbites...

Life is too damn short and too damn precious - and None, I know that I am singing with the choir on this one :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 12:22:06 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When JoeT made that comment about DeVries doing the show on Joran for the money, I wanted to scream.  I seriously don't believe DeVries recieved any more money than his normal paycheck from the network.  If anyone's in this for the money and exposure, it's JOET!!!!!


OH I completely 10000% agree.... at $500 per hour, ya think??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 12:22:46 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When JoeT made that comment about DeVries doing the show on Joran for the money, I wanted to scream.  I seriously don't believe DeVries recieved any more money than his normal paycheck from the network.  If anyone's in this for the money and exposure, it's JOET!!!!!


I've been hearing that same garbage about Beth and Greta and Jossy and Art and.......since this case started.  Everyone who isn't a Joran, Aruba, van der Sloot fan is in it for the money.  JoeT and Julie are just in it for truth and justice ya know.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

And anyone who is on this side of the family.. TJ Ward, Tim Miller,
Art Wood, Beth Jug, well they all have a drinking problem. Therefore, anything they say is not to be believed because they are drunks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 12:22:49 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When JoeT made that comment about DeVries doing the show on Joran for the money, I wanted to scream.  I seriously don't believe DeVries recieved any more money than his normal paycheck from the network.  If anyone's in this for the money and exposure, it's JOET!!!!!


I've been hearing that same garbage about Beth and Greta and Jossy and Art and.......since this case started.  Everyone who isn't a Joran, Aruba, van der Sloot fan is in it for the money.  JoeT and Julie are just in it for truth and justice ya know.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Yep, and I'm a virgin :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 12:23:23 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "robots"
if the police were allowed to search the main house they would have found SHOVELS that were used recently

and dirty clothes
 8)

It makes you wonder what was in the place.
If there was nothing there, why not let the police search as in the signed search warrant ?
And Ben Vocking sticking his neck out ? And the judge being there. Was the judge there with Ben Vocking when they swooped in on the SG residences ? NO, of course not.
Most of us are reasonable ppl. We can connect these dots. Who else was there ? KJ, was Dompig there ? Jan ?


Exactly, Kat_Gram!  Do they think we're stupid?  Maybe, but to me it's like saying "yea, we're protecting our friend and Beth and all you arrogant Americans can't do anything about it."  Then they put their lies out in the Aruban and Dutch media.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 12:24:07 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Well I don't intend to choose sides in this one, I posted what I did for I've heard of these videos from another source <not Rob> for some time now. I guess my thought is feeling better about that information for having heard it from Jossy finally last night on SM radio, then hearing it from my source, now to see Rob post about it?

Flaming seems to be the new sport lately, I just wish it was uniformly applied. Whenever I state an opinion or even tire of the games, I get roasted and burned at the stake in the lounge.

So Mrs I agree it's high time for the games to cease, for everyone to work on one team, but the issue also seems to be who is on what team?

I'm on team Natalee. I also have tried to contribute as much as I possibly could to this board, it may not have been as much as others, but I have consistently tried. I have also consistently thanked Tom, Red, Mrs, Klaas for the opportunity to participate here.

Rant over.

None you are not ranting you are speaking the truth.  There should be no teams as far as I'm concerned.  There is a main goal that everyone seems to want happen in this case and that is to find out what happened to Natalee and make sure she gets the Justice she deserves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 12:25:45 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Guys, can someone please post the fake Natalee and Joran photo? TIA

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PhotoshopPic2.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranPhotoshop2.jpg)

Edited to add:  a part of the De Vries show video.  Click on the photo to play the video:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/th_devries-joran.jpg) (http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/?action=view&current=devries-joran.flv)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Rob on December 02, 2006, 12:30:13 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When JoeT made that comment about DeVries doing the show on Joran for the money, I wanted to scream.  I seriously don't believe DeVries recieved any more money than his normal paycheck from the network.  If anyone's in this for the money and exposure, it's JOET!!!!!


Katysmom- First of all I am not an attention grab ass.. If I were, I would have posted about the video Jossy talked about last night and all the details I know of it when I learned of it five or so months ago. I dont post on a public board because something are better left in private as Mrs. Red said.

The video is now public knowledge. I have not discussed it with anyone. Now I only said that more would be coming out about it in the near future. Sorry for the heads up. I learned my lesson.

Also, Im not Robots.. LOL.. he way funnier than I and makes me laff my ass off when someone sends me his posts. Robots, you are very funny.

Mrs Red- Happy Holidays to you, Red, Klaas, Tom and to all the other Monks.

 :D

Hammer- Keep Hammering.. you are right on in your analysis. The Truth was always there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 12:31:33 PM
Thx, Klass.............
On the phone with a shrink and she's gonna look at it. Might be interesting....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 12:31:48 PM
hi rob,


robots  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 12:34:18 PM
Mrs Red-

We agree about not dangling carrots for I think at times, some can't understand that much happens behind the scenes that can't be divulged, and if it were it could place those very gains at risk. I think you and Red would both agree with that. I don't post anything I hear anymore because if one does, there is always a suspicion that you are lying or worse, that you are manipulating. At times that doesn't seem fair either. That being said, I have to agree with Hammer that I wonder why Jossy has delayed this for so long? I hope soon we can understand why and have an answer to that question.

As for life being too short, well yes indeed it is, and it's also why I don't suffer through being manipulated very well anymore. I know what death looks like and feels like now, don't anyone ever assume I haven't imagined that moment for Natalee either since having lived through the horror of it without losing my mind for my loved one.

San, thank you for your opinion matters very much to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 12:38:05 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Thx, Klass.............
On the phone with a shrink and she's gonna look at it. Might be interesting....


Thanks CBB... I would love to hear her thoughts...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 12:44:06 PM
I am listening to Dana about the search warrant. I did listen to parts last night, but it is good to listen again.
a.) They had a signed search warrant for the whole property.
b,) Then it was narrowed on the spot.
What happened in between these two events ?
Who made the legal protestations to the Judge ? Who objected ?
..
What has been on the blogs and from Dompig ages ago was that it was felt that as Paulus was home along with the younger brothers that Natalle would not have been in that part of the house.
Should not these arguements been made in court ?
Take the evidence and then decide if admissable / not admissable/ not relevent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 12:45:57 PM
Kat-

I'd like to know if any of this came up in the hearing this week? Likely not since De Vries is a dirty word to all things Aruban now, but by law and within a judiciary that values the truth, one would have expected it to?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 12:48:48 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Kat-

I'd like to know if any of this came up in the hearing this week? Likely not since De Vries is a dirty word to all things Aruban now, but by law and within a judiciary that values the truth, one would have expected it to?


the bold part, cracks me up... because prior to his investigation, he was heralded as a great and wise one


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 02, 2006, 12:49:17 PM
Morning, Monkeys.

Oh, I think Rob is implying when it was said, it will take a couple weeks before we know about whether or not the case against the suspects is thrown out, that something will come down the pike and he probably knows more than I, because I know nothing.

As far as being esoteric about Gabe Leo, that was for Memphis, because I think among some of us here there has always been doubt as to who Shango & Simian are/were and how many dopplegangers were posting.  Memphis finally came to a conclusion that I made long ago and anyone who has followed here knows that I always doubted the voracity of the Gabe Leo a/k/a Shango.  No big secret there.  That is not to say I know who it is but who I think it is not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 02, 2006, 12:50:03 PM
Afternoon monkeys.

Regarding the term "slippers," hubby spent many of his formative years on a small island and was trained never to wear his sandy outdoor shoes indoors. He buys shoes that look like something you would wear on a boat that he calls his "slippers" and changes into them from his outdoor shoes every time he comes into the house. What he calls slippers, though, don't look anything what I would think of as traditional slippers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 12:53:39 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 12:54:36 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Peaches... I am glad that you are feeling better today...

now has Sun checked in??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 12:55:11 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Kat-

I'd like to know if any of this came up in the hearing this week? Likely not since De Vries is a dirty word to all things Aruban now, but by law and within a judiciary that values the truth, one would have expected it to?


the bold part, cracks me up... because prior to his investigation, he was heralded as a great and wise one


yep and all the more funny now that MSM is hearing Beth state De Vries and SM in the same breath?

I think all the hubbub the hate sites are posting is positive proof it bothers the heck outta them too  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 12:55:44 PM
I'll add that I have NO inside information. none whatsoever. As VMS has in his/her sig line, everything I post is JMO.

I wish that I did have information. Would at least like to know if too much time has been spent going down a wrong path.

I'll also add that there is always the human issue. We're all human. There is always going to be human issues like egos, etc. clouding things up. That does not include the outright evil that has come from some, though.

Just my opinion, and I do realize that I don't have too much importance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 12:56:59 PM
.
SEARCH WARRANT~

Please remember that the Sloot compound features three buildings.  One is the main house, one called the sleeping quarters at least for the purpose of discussion and Joran's apartment.

If Paulus and the younger brothers were in fact sleeping where they would be expected to be, in the sleeping quarters or middle-sized building, then the entire main house was not occupied by any of them and therefore had no reason given that we are aware of for being excluded from the search.  Think of people sharing an apartment building and living in very close proximity.  Think of what can go on just one wall away let alone a separate building without those on the other side of the wall knowing about it.  Or think of a motel with the thin walls separating one room from another.

So even if Paulus and the two younger brothers were present somewhere on the compound, it should not have excluded all the property except for Joran's room and was therefor just a basis for this ruse.  A totally false justification whatever you call that.

And I am sure the answer would be Paulus was sleeping in the main house for blah blah blah reason which would be only another ruse.  They never intended to search there and the original search warrant was their little joke.

But in reality even if the other three family members had been present and sleeping in the normal places one would expect, why not search the vacant larger section of the compound?

  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 12:57:24 PM
I doubt it. It makes the prosection look bad and it is the prosecutor doing the presentation. And they all knew about it because it was their system that did this.
As for the video, Dompig has stated in the past that there was material from one perp. I never heard all three, of having sex with Natalee who was coming in and out of it. They had that since June of 2005.
The new part to me is that they found a clause in the law that would allow them to lay the rape and kidnapping charges. Now, it they had laid those charges, could they lay the murder ones later ?
I would like to know more about their Crown Witness system.
We we told there was no such thing as plea bargains, but I am thinking the only way to get more out of these perverts is to lay the charges. But then, would a strong case be presented ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 12:57:49 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Are you still having bone pain?  :(


Title: money
Post by: Cat on December 02, 2006, 12:57:59 PM
Joet said he was pro bono on TV.I heard him,and he speaks like many attorneys,with a forked tounge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 01:00:06 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I'll add that I have NO inside information. none whatsoever. As VMS has in his/her sig line, everything I post is JMO.

I wish that I did have information. Would at least like to know if too much time has been spent going down a wrong path.

I'll also add that there is always the human issue. We're all human. There is always going to be human issues like egos, etc. clouding things up. That does not include the outright evil that has come from some, though.

Just my opinion, and I do realize that I don't have too much importance.

memphis you are important.  Everyone on the board is important.  What one person doesn't catch in those statements another person does.  We all look at things in a different way.  Just like you are good at Shango and I suck at it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 01:00:09 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I'll add that I have NO inside information. none whatsoever. As VMS has in his/her sig line, everything I post is JMO.

I wish that I did have information. Would at least like to know if too much time has been spent going down a wrong path.

I'll also add that there is always the human issue. We're all human. There is always going to be human issues like egos, etc. clouding things up. That does not include the outright evil that has come from some, though.

Just my opinion, and I do realize that I don't have too much importance.


You're important to me!  I love seeing your cute little avatar here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 01:00:34 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I'll add that I have NO inside information. none whatsoever. As VMS has in his/her sig line, everything I post is JMO.

I wish that I did have information. Would at least like to know if too much time has been spent going down a wrong path.

I'll also add that there is always the human issue. We're all human. There is always going to be human issues like egos, etc. clouding things up. That does not include the outright evil that has come from some, though.

Just my opinion, and I do realize that I don't have too much importance.


Oh I disagree, you are very important... we are ALL important... after all, we ARE  monkeys...  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 01:02:15 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Are you still having bone pain?  :(


Yes.  It's very weird.  Comes and goes.  Usually happens in the big bones like femur, hips, back.  Percoset works well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 01:02:34 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "memphis"
I'll add that I have NO inside information. none whatsoever. As VMS has in his/her sig line, everything I post is JMO.

I wish that I did have information. Would at least like to know if too much time has been spent going down a wrong path.

I'll also add that there is always the human issue. We're all human. There is always going to be human issues like egos, etc. clouding things up. That does not include the outright evil that has come from some, though.

Just my opinion, and I do realize that I don't have too much importance.

memphis you are important.  Everyone on the board is important.  What one person doesn't catch in those statements another person does.  We all look at things in a different way.  Just like you are good at Shango and I suck at it.
[/b][/color]

San once again we agree and like always you said it so much better... Keep in mind monkeys, DeVries got a lot of info from reading y'alls comments on here.... now doesn't that say a lot??????  We do help and everyone is important...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:02:47 PM
Actually I was about to ask Memphis to share her theory of who Shango is with all of us, because I value her opinion. So give it up Memphis, I really want to know !

I also would like to hear who tyler thinks it isn't !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 01:02:51 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
SEARCH WARRANT~

Please remember that the Sloot compound features three buildings.  One is the main house, one called the sleeping quarters at least for the purpose of discussion and Joran's apartment.

If Paulus and the younger brothers were in fact sleeping where they would be expected to be, in the sleeping quarters or middle-sized building, then the entire main house was not occupied by any of them and therefore had no reason given that we are aware of for being excluded from the search.  Think of people sharing an apartment building and living in very close proximity.  Think of what can go on just one wall away let alone a separate building without those on the other side of the wall knowing about it.  Or think of a motel with the thin walls separating one room from another.

So even if Paulus and the two younger brothers were present somewhere on the compound, it should not have excluded all the property except for Joran's room and was therefor just a basis for this ruse.  A totally false justification whatever you call that.

And I am sure the answer would be Paulus was sleeping in the main house for blah blah blah reason which would be only another ruse.  They never intended to search there and the original search warrant was their little joke.

But in reality even if the other three family members had been present and sleeping in the normal places one would expect, why not search the vacant larger section of the compound?

  :?

Now my question is what if there is proof that the brothers were indeed with Anita in Holland.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:03:12 PM
:oops:  I really wasn't fishing...I don't think, but thank you.  :wink:


Title: Re: money
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 01:04:03 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
Joet said he was pro bono on TV.I heard him,and he speaks like many attorneys,with a forked tounge.


He is so in love with himself.  When I see him on TV I always think, look, he's lying!  His mouth is moving!

I doubt he's doing this pro bono.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:04:04 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Are you still having bone pain?  :(


Yes.  It's very weird.  Comes and goes.  Usually happens in the big bones like femur, hips, back.  Percoset works well.


well I was worried and hate to think of you in pain, but I know you have the resolve and attitude to defeat this, I just wish we could make it easier for you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:06:09 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Are you still having bone pain?  :(


Yes.  It's very weird.  Comes and goes.  Usually happens in the big bones like femur, hips, back.  Percoset works well.


So very sorry to hear that. Is that a side effect of the chemo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 01:06:28 PM
Oh, I wish I could have found the NG show in CNN archives.
Joran's apartment was deemed ( by who, you insert names ) to be a separate residence on the property. It isn't by American laws as there is no  kitchen, dining room. The laundry facilities are in another part of the house. Joran was not a tenant on the property. He did not pay rent on
the property and he had full access to every other part of the property.
So, was KJ ambushed by a well planned technicality and did she get caught without a handy legal opposition ? Or did she jsut giggle and cave ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 01:08:07 PM
Thanks, None.  The encouragement I get from y'all helps me tremendously.  It really does.  And most of the time I feel okay.  The days following chemo always suck in varying degrees but then it bottoms out and heads up again.  Very predictable.  

I wish we could see the de Vries program.  I have read the synopsis elsewhere and it sounded interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:08:50 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Actually I was about to ask Memphis to share her theory of who Shango is with all of us, because I value her opinion. So give it up Memphis, I really want to know !

I also would like to hear who tyler thinks it isn't !


You do realize that I know nothing for sure, right?

So, I'm not really dangling a carrot, when I say I'd rather not say on the board.  :lol:

Seriously, I don't want to say, because I think that Shango is still around.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 02, 2006, 01:09:51 PM
Videos -- A Question...

nonesuche and Rob have bother referred to "videos" in recent posts, and also refer to some mention of these videos in media: either Dana & Jossy or Bill O'Reilly.

Can a better informed monkey kindly summarize what "VIDEOS" are being referred to, what the videos are presumed to show, and any other relevant info?

Many thanks -- this is one piece of info I have missed.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:10:23 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Oh, I wish I could have found the NG show in CNN archives.
Joran's apartment was deemed ( by who, you insert names ) to be a separate residence on the property. It isn't by American laws as there is no  kitchen, dining room. The laundry facilities are in another part of the house. Joran was not a tenant on the property. He did not pay rent on
the property and he had full access to every other part of the property.
So, was KJ ambushed by a well planned technicality and did she get caught without a handy legal opposition ? Or did she jsut giggle and cave ?


I'm with Hat on Janssen, she was in on this from the get-go. She's only made small stabs throughout whenever the heat was turned up, at some placating small nibble toward accountability, almost like a teaser.

I never forget even her own staff turned on her by meeting with Dave either, and blowing the whistle on the Gottenbos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 02, 2006, 01:11:14 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Actually I was about to ask Memphis to share her theory of who Shango is with all of us, because I value her opinion. So give it up Memphis, I really want to know !

I also would like to hear who tyler thinks it isn't !


You do realize that I know nothing for sure, right?

So, I'm not really dangling a carrot, when I say I'd rather not say on the board.  :lol:

Seriously, I don't want to say, because I think that Shango is still around.


Memphis,

Here is my e-mail address:   sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com

If you feel okay about doing it, would you e-mail me and tell me privately who you think Shango is? I know it will be your opinion, but I've always been very interested in the whole Shango thing. Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 01:11:59 PM
Memphis, the bone pain is a side effect of a Neulasta shot that I get the day after chemo.  The purpose of the shot is to ramp up the production of white blood cells so I can fight infection.  The main side effect is bone pain.  The commercials say "mild to moderate".  Big people lie.  I had a pain in my breastbone one day while I was driving to work that sucked the air right out of my lungs.  Therefore, Percoset.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:13:03 PM
Memphis !  :shock: inquiring minds want to know !

Hammer-

Klaas can likely answer it better but the most recent video we are referring to Jossy released openly last night, it's video he has of ALE admitting to certain truths such as feeling the death of Natalee occurred at the VDS residence. That was likely what BOR was referring to last night as well. You can listen to Dana's podcast for the interview with Jossy discussing it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:14:45 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Actually I was about to ask Memphis to share her theory of who Shango is with all of us, because I value her opinion. So give it up Memphis, I really want to know !

I also would like to hear who tyler thinks it isn't !


You do realize that I know nothing for sure, right?

So, I'm not really dangling a carrot, when I say I'd rather not say on the board.  :lol:

Seriously, I don't want to say, because I think that Shango is still around.


Memphis,

Here is my e-mail address:   sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com

If you feel okay about doing it, would you e-mail me and tell me privately who you think Shango is? I know it will be your opinion, but I've always been very interested in the whole Shango thing. Thanks!


Will I be required to list all my reasons for thinking so?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:15:09 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Memphis, the bone pain is a side effect of a Neulasta shot that I get the day after chemo.  The purpose of the shot is to ramp up the production of white blood cells so I can fight infection.  The main side effect is bone pain.  The commercials say "mild to moderate".  Big people lie.  I had a pain in my breastbone one day while I was driving to work that sucked the air right out of my lungs.  Therefore, Percoset.


{{{ HUGS }}} the pain you endure via treatments is hard to describe Peaches, just so sorry you have to suffer so much to beat this beast. I am always so proud of you !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 02, 2006, 01:16:27 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Actually I was about to ask Memphis to share her theory of who Shango is with all of us, because I value her opinion. So give it up Memphis, I really want to know !

I also would like to hear who tyler thinks it isn't !


You do realize that I know nothing for sure, right?

So, I'm not really dangling a carrot, when I say I'd rather not say on the board.  :lol:

Seriously, I don't want to say, because I think that Shango is still around.


Memphis,

Here is my e-mail address:   sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com

If you feel okay about doing it, would you e-mail me and tell me privately who you think Shango is? I know it will be your opinion, but I've always been very interested in the whole Shango thing. Thanks!


Will I be required to list all my reasons for thinking so?  :lol:


No requirements at all - any crumbs will be appreciated.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:17:10 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Memphis, the bone pain is a side effect of a Neulasta shot that I get the day after chemo.  The purpose of the shot is to ramp up the production of white blood cells so I can fight infection.  The main side effect is bone pain.  The commercials say "mild to moderate".  Big people lie.  I had a pain in my breastbone one day while I was driving to work that sucked the air right out of my lungs.  Therefore, Percoset.


Peaches, I'm so sorry. It is horrible to be in pain. I am glad to hear that it is a side effect, though.
 
I had my own little run-in with the c-monster, but my battle was very easy compared to yours.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 02, 2006, 01:19:26 PM
LOL at the little Boston.

OK, but I gotta run right now. Honest.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 02, 2006, 01:20:25 PM
Okay, now that I'm caught up here, I need to check my dining room paint job and see if I need to touch up some places.  Not to mention the long list of household stuff.  DH is off to do two shows with his quartet so I'm on my own!  WOOHOO!!!!

Hugs to y'all for your constant prayers and support.  I appreciate it more than you know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 01:21:59 PM
Whoah.................I'll try to remember everything she said, (Dr. Robbins can spin a yarn and rather enjoys the challenge). Background and disclaimer: Board Certified Psychiatrist, 22 years private practice, 6 years for Community Mental Health, my clinic, and Social Security. Staff priviledges at Virginia and Tenn State hospital and VA in Tn. Staff position at ETSU Medical School. She has NO independant knowledge of this particular person (Joran) and any professional opinion has no basis other than generalities. ( I promised I would make that clear before sharing her opinions with anybody.) OK!

First, the fact that the picture was made at all, either by his own efforts or commissioned, only makes sense to a culpable party. Not logical for an innocent party who has been the victim of false accusations to memorialize such an upheaval to his life. Action would be expected of antisocial ( phsycopathic) personality: Souvenir, and if picture is chosen, it says, " Me and Natalee have a secret" in the face of a world that wants to know. Asserts the control that is the major player in antisocial personality.
The timing of the picture is telling; paralells Joran's transition from feeling the heat/threat to beginning to feel comfortable again. When the heat was on, Focused anger, hatred, rage tw'd Beth ( probably why pic was in her house; intruding her life as she was intruding his). " He'd like nothing better than to break into that Bitch's (Beth's) home." As the threat of being caught lessened he may actually enjoy some of the attention and more likely to accept risk ( having the pic made at all). Public interview was evidence of increasing comfort and willingness to take risk; the successful risk-taking regains his control.
As quickly as he has cycled through the stages, he'll have other incidences in his life. Look at OJ, and the recent book, "IF I did it". That wasn't all about the money. Need to assert control, but because of his age it has taken a longer time to reach the level of comfort to balance the risk to gain it.

That's about all I can remember, and I typed it quickly so forgive the spelling errors. For what it's worth, I wanted to share her thoughts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 02, 2006, 01:23:08 PM
Hey Monkeys....I can not believe I missed BOR.

Now trhat Karen Jansen has her ticket out of d :oops: dodge...
maybe they will come to some real conclusions...now that all the
relevant parties ( Dompig, KIA warden,  Vanderstratten, Jansen) have moved on .....with their lies....( did i miss anyone???)


IPSIGS--the answer to your q re: Carlo/ MJ is no---not ever


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:23:41 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis !  :shock: inquiring minds want to know !

Hammer-

Klaas can likely answer it better but the most recent video we are referring to Jossy released openly last night, it's video he has of ALE admitting to certain truths such as feeling the death of Natalee occurred at the VDS residence. That was likely what BOR was referring to last night as well. You can listen to Dana's podcast for the interview with Jossy discussing it.


Not just ALE but DOMPIG in particular.

Edited to add:  Jossy said on Dana last night that he had a video of DOMPIG admitting that they had enough evidence on JK2 to convict them on rape and kidnapping charges.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:25:21 PM
Wow CBB-

Thank you ! What was the climate in mid-January when Joran made that request? I need to review the timeline to see how much heat actually was on the agenda?

I don't think the photo was taken at Nat's house but at the house of one of the MB kids? Just thought I'd let you know that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 01:25:51 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "memphis"
I also have an idea of who Shango is, and it ain't Gabe Leo.
:wink:


It used to be blasphemy to say that, Memphis.  I was flamed, lied about and thoroughly castigated because I did not believe Gabe Leo was Shango.  And yet when he posts on the FP even if Klaas brings it over here, no one runs over there to ask him about being Shango or to share some of his insight with us.  And most of us wish he wouldn't share as much as he often does in his rants, lol.  Very pro-MEP Aruba,  :lol:

But then I have always found Shango to be about as accurate as a fortune cookie.  Gets a lucky hit every once in a while.  The "code" is in Marvel comics and not some deep thinker's mind.

Rave= date rape drug.  House of Rave = C&C, elders, Babylonians, etc. all in the comic series.  Nothing deep or profound about it.  I have picked too many of them off the floor not to recognize the terms and phrases.

But as you say, this is just what I think.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 01:26:25 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Wow CBB-

Thank you ! What was the climate in mid-January when Joran made that request? I need to review the timeline to see how much heat actually was on the agenda?

I don't think the photo was taken at Nat's house but at the house of one of the MB kids? Just thought I'd let you know that?


Woops! I told her it was Beth's house. Sowwy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:26:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis !  :shock: inquiring minds want to know !

Hammer-

Klaas can likely answer it better but the most recent video we are referring to Jossy released openly last night, it's video he has of ALE admitting to certain truths such as feeling the death of Natalee occurred at the VDS residence. That was likely what BOR was referring to last night as well. You can listen to Dana's podcast for the interview with Jossy discussing it.


Not just ALE but DOMPIG in particular.


I always feel better when you tell the details, I listened to the podcast while posting so wanted to be sure that was correct!

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/names%20and%20words/rocks.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:27:59 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Wow CBB-

Thank you ! What was the climate in mid-January when Joran made that request? I need to review the timeline to see how much heat actually was on the agenda?

I don't think the photo was taken at Nat's house but at the house of one of the MB kids? Just thought I'd let you know that?


Woops! I told her it was Beth's house. Sowwy.


Don't be sorry, actually my mind was factoring through another angle, for we don't know Joran didn't know that it wasn't Nat's house, right?

But if he did, what if he yearned in some sick way to be part of the MB group? Would that have been a high for a sociopath as well? I have to wonder, something along the lines of I walk among you but you never had a clue?  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 01:28:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis !  :shock: inquiring minds want to know !

Hammer-

Klaas can likely answer it better but the most recent video we are referring to Jossy released openly last night, it's video he has of ALE admitting to certain truths such as feeling the death of Natalee occurred at the VDS residence. That was likely what BOR was referring to last night as well. You can listen to Dana's podcast for the interview with Jossy discussing it.


Not just ALE but DOMPIG in particular.



Jossy says TAPE not video.  I tend to think it is audio only for some reason.  Did he say video at any time?  Like Jossy wearing a wire and talking with Dompig without Dompig knowing it maybe.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 01:28:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis !  :shock: inquiring minds want to know !

Hammer-

Klaas can likely answer it better but the most recent video we are referring to Jossy released openly last night, it's video he has of ALE admitting to certain truths such as feeling the death of Natalee occurred at the VDS residence. That was likely what BOR was referring to last night as well. You can listen to Dana's podcast for the interview with Jossy discussing it.


Not just ALE but DOMPIG in particular.

Edited to add:  Jossy said on Dana last night that he had a video of DOMPIG admitting that they had enough evidence on JK2 to convict them on rape and kidnapping charges.

But, then, he went and did the interviews and contradict himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 02, 2006, 01:29:38 PM
None & Klaas --

Thanks for update on "videos" -- I see now what you all were referring to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 01:29:54 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Wow CBB-

Thank you ! What was the climate in mid-January when Joran made that request? I need to review the timeline to see how much heat actually was on the agenda?

I don't think the photo was taken at Nat's house but at the house of one of the MB kids? Just thought I'd let you know that?


Woops! I told her it was Beth's house. Sowwy.



It may be the Anderson's house?  Not sure.  Anyone know whose house it is for certain?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 01:30:12 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Wow CBB-

Thank you ! What was the climate in mid-January when Joran made that request? I need to review the timeline to see how much heat actually was on the agenda?

I don't think the photo was taken at Nat's house but at the house of one of the MB kids? Just thought I'd let you know that?


Woops! I told her it was Beth's house. Sowwy.


Don't be sorry, actually my mind was factoring through another angle, for we don't know Joran didn't know that it wasn't Nat's house, right?

But if he did, what if he yearned in some sick way to be part of the MB group? Would that have been a high for a sociopath as well? I have to wonder, something along the lines of I walk among you but you never had a clue?  :shock:


I'm assuming that even if Joran did know it wasn't Nat's/Beth's house, it was "Home" in relation to Aruba. I hate that I was under the wrong impression.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:30:16 PM
Shoot, I'm going to be totally honest too about my response to Hammer's question, for I really fear saying Dompig out loud as it relates to that video. I was told weeks ago that was the part no one should tell out loud, it really stuck with me too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:30:33 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis !  :shock: inquiring minds want to know !

Hammer-

Klaas can likely answer it better but the most recent video we are referring to Jossy released openly last night, it's video he has of ALE admitting to certain truths such as feeling the death of Natalee occurred at the VDS residence. That was likely what BOR was referring to last night as well. You can listen to Dana's podcast for the interview with Jossy discussing it.


Not just ALE but DOMPIG in particular.



Jossy says TAPE not video.  I tend to think it is audio only for some reason.  Did he say video at any time?  Like Jossy wearing a wire and talking with Dompig without Dompig knowing it maybe.

.


Excellent point, he did say TAPE, not VIDEO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 01:31:15 PM
Andersons is what I read too. Probably we read the same stuff .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 02, 2006, 01:32:02 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Shoot, I'm going to be totally honest too about my response to Hammer's question, for I really fear saying Dompig out loud as it relates to that video. I was told weeks ago that was the part no one should tell out loud, it really stuck with me too.


 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:32:34 PM
Anna-

That photo came from a series of photos in a photo album. I can't discern any name in terms of which house, RU's folks posted the Anderson house. I think it was pausebreak who posted that.

I have also heard it's video so that would involve a hidden camera.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:33:22 PM
Nonesuche??  What do you mean?  It was Jossy who said he had the tape of Dompig last night on Dana's show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:40:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche??  What do you mean?  It was Jossy who said he had the tape of Dompig last night on Dana's show.


I mean the rumor I heard was "video" and that may be entirely wrong, one more example of why I don't want to be part of information that could be incorrect. So sorry I stated that one, let's leave it at what Jossy stated publicly for that is what should matter here, not rumor secondhand.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Frijole on December 02, 2006, 01:43:15 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?


Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.


Glad to see you are up and perky this a.m. my Husker buddy.  No doubt you have put on some red for the special game?!  Hugs to you Peaches.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 01:43:57 PM
CBB... thanks so much for that... it was interesting.. I had no idea that wasn't Natalee's house but in the sense that the DR is speaking, it really is her house.. ya know???


Gotta go see the local Christmas parade... supposedly they are going to say Christmas this year.... and read the new front page!!!  

BBL... keep the faith monkeys!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 01:47:47 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Nonesuche??  What do you mean?  It was Jossy who said he had the tape of Dompig last night on Dana's show.


I mean the rumor I heard was "video" and that may be entirely wrong, one more example of why I don't want to be part of information that could be incorrect. So sorry I stated that one, let's leave it at what Jossy stated publicly for that is what should matter here, not rumor secondhand.  :oops:


We it may very well be audio/video.  Doesn't make much difference to me.  I'm sure we will find out soon enough. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 01:50:26 PM
Well, I knew about the tape before Jossy even made it cause he told me he was going to do it in advance, lol!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I am just kidding but wanted to play in the one upmanship game and so just had to say that.  It is not true.  


But I hope after Skeeters, etc. Dompig would be too wary to fall for a hidden camera and will stick with audio tape for Jossy is from the old school and I would not be surprised if he didn't have a regular wire like LE uses that has remote control to download, etc.  Relays the sound from microphone only taped to body to remote area nearby for recording and download.

Surely Dompig wouldn't go on record with this but then again, he talks out of both sides of his mouth with the greatest of ease so maybe he did.  If he had any sense at all, he would meet Jossy in open area at place of his own chosing on very short notice so as to avoid being caught on any hidden devices at all.  Unless, he was on the record and did not mind being quoted.  In that case, I wonder why Jossy waited so long to release this tape for he has mentioned it before I do believe.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 01:55:17 PM
Anna-

Just for the record for I know you are teasing me, but it's important to me to state I do not speak with or correspond with Jossy. I also am not some key player here, nor do I portray that I am.

I hear rumors and have some sources I do trust, beyond that I am learning once again, just stay out of it. At times we do appear to eat our own best-intentioned young  :wink:

I'll go lick my wounds now and get jiggy with my day and hope everyone stays the course here !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 01:58:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
We it may very well be audio/video.  Doesn't make much difference to me.  I'm sure we will find out soon enough. :wink:



How do you think we will find out, Klaas?  Do you think deVries will do a sequel and feature this tape/video?

Maybe when KJ leaves, the new prosecutor who takes her place might actually bring charges?  I think it is far too late for KJ to do so as any trial, etc. would be after her retirement, etc. so wouldn't make any sense.

She seems to be just running the clock out on her term in office and not likely to do any more at all.

I am hoping to see a whole different attitude from the one replacing her but only because it is something about which to be hopeful.  No real reason to think that and certainly not anything evidenced by past action in Aruba.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 01:59:51 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"

IPSIGS--the answer to your q re: Carlo/ MJ is no---not ever

Thanks FOM. It must have been Abraham Jones that Carlo talked to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2006, 02:00:36 PM
ATTENTION ALL TROLLS who read here (and non-trolls...lol)...There is still a substantial reward offered  anonymously, of course. It is a lot of money. Someone knows something....wanna talk?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 02, 2006, 02:01:52 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I don't like it and in fact I hate it when little tidbits and secrets are
hinted at. By anyone.
These dangling carrots are a tease and as far as I am concerned they are in the same category as Joran saying, someday I will tell you the whole story, but right now, I am not ready.
So, what are we to do, sit here in anticipation waiting for more hints, clues and cryptic messages ?
..
I am not going to fall for any more of that kind of nonsense. And any one who posts that stuff has zero credibility with me.
..
And Rob, what is the point of doing this ?


I hear ya Kat and ITA!! It really pisses me off.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 02:02:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
We it may very well be audio/video.  Doesn't make much difference to me.  I'm sure we will find out soon enough. :wink:



How do you think we will find out, Klaas?  Do you think deVries will do a sequel and feature this tape/video?

Maybe when KJ leaves, the new prosecutor who takes her place might actually bring charges?  I think it is far too late for KJ to do so as any trial, etc. would be after her retirement, etc. so wouldn't make any sense.

She seems to be just running the clock out on her term in office and not likely to do any more at all.

I am hoping to see a whole different attitude from the one replacing her but only because it is something about which to be hopeful.  No real reason to think that and certainly not anything evidenced by past action in Aruba.

.


My guess is we'll find out just like we did last night, from Jossy himself.  

I do think De Vries is planning a follow-up show, at least that's what it sounds like from the Dutch posters.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 02:04:49 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Anna-

Just for the record for I know you are teasing me, but it's important to me to state I do not speak with or correspond with Jossy. I also am not some key player here, nor do I portray that I am.

I hear rumors and have some sources I do trust, beyond that I am learning once again, just stay out of it. At times we do appear to eat our own best-intentioned young  :wink:

I'll go lick my wounds now and get jiggy with my day and hope everyone stays the course here !



None,
Yes, I am just teasing but not especially you, just protesting the carrot being dangled, etc.  I hope any wounds did not come from me as I am also only stating my opinion based on what Jossy said.  It's not important if it is audio/video or CD but if the content is anything usable.

I surely hope that it is.  Hard to get hopeful of anything concrete any more.  But Dompig did go on the record at one time saying all that, the suspects are guilty as hell were his exact words so we do know at one time he held that conviction.

I just hope Dompig doesn't just say things changed and new information caused him to change his mind about whatever Jossy has on the tape/video.  That is what I am afraid Dompig will do about that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 02:07:08 PM
Video

There was an interview that Dompig gave on MSNBC where he said that Janssen was hoping to charge J2K with *felony assault* but the judge told her that there were too many *conflicting statements* to make that charge.

This is not the video Jossy is talking about, right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 02:08:17 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Whoah.................I'll try to remember everything she said, (Dr. Robbins can spin a yarn and rather enjoys the challenge). Background and disclaimer: Board Certified Psychiatrist, 22 years private practice, 6 years for Community Mental Health, my clinic, and Social Security. Staff priviledges at Virginia and Tenn State hospital and VA in Tn. Staff position at ETSU Medical School. She has NO independant knowledge of this particular person (Joran) and any professional opinion has no basis other than generalities. ( I promised I would make that clear before sharing her opinions with anybody.) OK!

First, the fact that the picture was made at all, either by his own efforts or commissioned, only makes sense to a culpable party. Not logical for an innocent party who has been the victim of false accusations to memorialize such an upheaval to his life. Action would be expected of antisocial ( phsycopathic) personality: Souvenir, and if picture is chosen, it says, " Me and Natalee have a secret" in the face of a world that wants to know. Asserts the control that is the major player in antisocial personality.
The timing of the picture is telling; paralells Joran's transition from feeling the heat/threat to beginning to feel comfortable again. When the heat was on, Focused anger, hatred, rage tw'd Beth ( probably why pic was in her house; intruding her life as she was intruding his). " He'd like nothing better than to break into that Bitch's (Beth's) home." As the threat of being caught lessened he may actually enjoy some of the attention and more likely to accept risk ( having the pic made at all). Public interview was evidence of increasing comfort and willingness to take risk; the successful risk-taking regains his control.
As quickly as he has cycled through the stages, he'll have other incidences in his life. Look at OJ, and the recent book, "IF I did it". That wasn't all about the money. Need to assert control, but because of his age it has taken a longer time to reach the level of comfort to balance the risk to gain it.

That's about all I can remember, and I typed it quickly so forgive the spelling errors. For what it's worth, I wanted to share her thoughts.


Great stuff, CBB!  Thanks!  It makes sense that someone who was falsely accused would want nothing more to do with the victim, not some memorial or more false information about the two of them!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2006, 02:09:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
We it may very well be audio/video.  Doesn't make much difference to me.  I'm sure we will find out soon enough. :wink:



How do you think we will find out, Klaas?  Do you think deVries will do a sequel and feature this tape/video?

Maybe when KJ leaves, the new prosecutor who takes her place might actually bring charges?  I think it is far too late for KJ to do so as any trial, etc. would be after her retirement, etc. so wouldn't make any sense.

She seems to be just running the clock out on her term in office and not likely to do any more at all.

I am hoping to see a whole different attitude from the one replacing her but only because it is something about which to be hopeful.  No real reason to think that and certainly not anything evidenced by past action in Aruba.

.


My guess is we'll find out just like we did last night, from Jossy himself.  

I do think De Vries is planning a follow-up show, at least that's what it sounds like from the Dutch posters.


Yes Jossy said last night Devries is planning a follow up show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 02:10:18 PM
Nonesie:  
I'm reading out of order to find things I missed, so I'm not following the entire storyline here.  But I thought maybe you needed a hug.  

{{{Nonesie}}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 02:11:06 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Video

There was an interview that Dompig gave on MSNBC where he said that Janssen was hoping to charge J2K with *felony assault* but the judge told her that there were too many *conflicting statements* to make that charge.

This is not the video Jossy is talking about, right?

Right, that is NOT the tape/video Jossy is talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 02, 2006, 02:11:26 PM
Just to let everyone know as I have seen some comments by some regarding Jossy interview. 95% of all conversations are never repeated. Is it used for background, yes. Some of the info comes out in subliminal posts, not verbatum. But to think that because others know about info only ,,, then you just have not followed where most all news on this story is broke on-line.

The reason why I asked Dana to have Jossy repeat the part about the Dompig video tape was to make sure everyone heard it. Sometimes we all go off on tangents in this case and do not hear what is being said. Not that it was a surprise to me, but because I did not want the point lost in all the other info.

The reason it was important? Because I was wondering when Jossy was going to ever make this public. I had been waiting for at least 5 months. I had heard of the video tape and what was on it. I would presume there is much more on it than Jossy stated last night.

However, the point being that Jossy Mansur let the cat out of the bag on Scared Monkeys that the tape existed after it being under wraps for so long.

There is much to this case that goes on behind the scenes that although I may be privy to, I cannot talk about as the point is to not just have people come to SM because I know something first that others may not.

Actually, at this point if all of you do not realize that when the news comes out, that we do not already know about it then many have not been following the case for the past 18 months.

Every so often I may hint at something but I will never say ... I know this, but you have to wait. A perfect example was when we posted back on July 21, 2006 not to get too comfortable and that you were still a suspect. We knew that De Vries was going to be investigating long before it ever became public and on and on.

I do appreciate Jossy for letting that news out on Scared Monkeys first during last nights interview with Dana.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2006, 02:14:24 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Just to let everyone know as I have seen some comments by some regarding Jossy interview. 95% of all conversations are never repeated. Is it used for background, yes. Some of the info comes out in subliminal posts, not verbatum. But to think that because others know about info only ,,, then you just have not followed where most all news on this story is broke on-line.

The reason why I asked Dana to have Jossy repeat the part about the Dompig video tape was to make sure everyone heard it. Sometimes we all go off on tangents in this case and do not hear what is being said. Not that it was a surprise to me, but because I did not want the point lost in all the other info.

The reason it was important? Because I was wondering when Jossy was going to ever make this public. I had been waiting for at least 5 months. I had heard of the video tape and what was on it. I would presume there is much more on it than Jossy stated last night.

However, the point being that Jossy Mansur let the cat out of the bag on Scared Monkeys that the tape existed after it being under wraps for so long.

There is much to this case that goes on behind the scenes that although I may be privy to, I cannot talk about as the point is to not just have people come to SM because I know something first that others may not.

Actually, at this point if all of you do not realize that when the news comes out, that we do not already know about it then many have not been following the case for the past 18 months.

Every so often I may hint at something but I will never say ... I know this, but you have to wait. A perfect example was when we posted back on July 21, 2006 not to get too comfortable and that you were still a suspect. We knew that De Vries was going to be investigating long before it ever became public and on and on.

I do appreciate Jossy for letting that news out on Scared Monkeys first during last nights interview with Dana.


Yes monkeys please be patient, the fat lady has not bgan to sign yet . :-)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 02:16:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Video

There was an interview that Dompig gave on MSNBC where he said that Janssen was hoping to charge J2K with *felony assault* but the judge told her that there were too many *conflicting statements* to make that charge.

This is not the video Jossy is talking about, right?

Right, that is NOT the tape/video Jossy is talking about.

Thanks Klaas.

Thanks for the update RED!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Red on December 02, 2006, 02:18:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Video

There was an interview that Dompig gave on MSNBC where he said that Janssen was hoping to charge J2K with *felony assault* but the judge told her that there were too many *conflicting statements* to make that charge.

This is not the video Jossy is talking about, right?

Right, that is NOT the tape/video Jossy is talking about.


No ... no ... no ...

That is not even close to the tape.

Makes one wonder why the once lead cop has stated on tape that they have enough, yet nothing has been done .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Just to let everyone know as I have seen some comments by some regarding Jossy interview. 95% of all conversations are never repeated. Is it used for background, yes. Some of the info comes out in subliminal posts, not verbatum. But to think that because others know about info only ,,, then you just have not followed where most all news on this story is broke on-line.

The reason why I asked Dana to have Jossy repeat the part about the Dompig video tape was to make sure everyone heard it. Sometimes we all go off on tangents in this case and do not hear what is being said. Not that it was a surprise to me, but because I did not want the point lost in all the other info.

The reason it was important? Because I was wondering when Jossy was going to ever make this public. I had been waiting for at least 5 months. I had heard of the video tape and what was on it. I would presume there is much more on it than Jossy stated last night.

However, the point being that Jossy Mansur let the cat out of the bag on Scared Monkeys that the tape existed after it being under wraps for so long.

There is much to this case that goes on behind the scenes that although I may be privy to, I cannot talk about as the point is to not just have people come to SM because I know something first that others may not.

Actually, at this point if all of you do not realize that when the news comes out, that we do not already know about it then many have not been following the case for the past 18 months.

Every so often I may hint at something but I will never say ... I know this, but you have to wait. A perfect example was when we posted back on July 21, 2006 not to get too comfortable and that you were still a suspect. We knew that De Vries was going to be investigating long before it ever became public and on and on.

I do appreciate Jossy for letting that news out on Scared Monkeys first during last nights interview with Dana.


Red thanks for I have never assumed you weren't in the know, nor have I wanted information to be risked prematurely to give a heads-up to the perps either, so I appreciate the demand for confidentiality.

Are you now and again confirming it IS a VIDEO tape? I'd love to put this to rest if you can, TIA !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 02:22:57 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Afternoon monkeys.

Regarding the term "slippers," hubby spent many of his formative years on a small island and was trained never to wear his sandy outdoor shoes indoors. He buys shoes that look like something you would wear on a boat that he calls his "slippers" and changes into them from his outdoor shoes every time he comes into the house. What he calls slippers, though, don't look anything what I would think of as traditional slippers.


Mine are fuzzy and warm because it's cold here.  Not that anyone cares, but I can't picture Joran wearing them.  I just figured they were sandals or something.  Like delicious - something was lost in the translation - I have to believe that or I'll lose my lunch.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 02:23:01 PM
.
The ever wiley Dompig once admitted the suspects were guilty but then after his brother in law who lives in the bushes was released the last time from prison or whatever, he talked it over with his source Bouti, every reliable and clear of thought, and came to the conclusion that Natalee was heavily into drug use and possession.

He never got around to why and how she buried herself, dug herself up and relocated her remains but I am sure another consultation with Bouti might clear that all up as well.

Yes, I am being sarcastic but these people are like their jello laws, they change everything based on their current theory and agenda.  Around the same time Dompig was saying guilty he was in Aruba saying this well might be an insurance scam perpetrated by Beth.  Plays to his audience it would seem.

And now I see this in my immediate future

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/455rtb6_th.jpg)

but did want to leave ROBOTS the thought that maybe the sneakers (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thththsneakersblack1.gif)
all on their own like this, lol.  I do wonder about the cut on Joran's foot being why he wore the slippers for it was reported on his arrest even ten days later so must have been sizeable.  Remember Beth said something about the way they were dressed being odd for having just been to the casino so maybe it was the footwear she questioned?

Like others, everything I say is just my opinion and means nothing.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/thWonderfulDay-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: dkpen on December 02, 2006, 02:27:27 PM
Hi everyone!

Klaas you have e-mail.  :wink:


Not staying, hubby and I are off for more Christmas shopping. My favorite time of year. Well, all year. The joy of giving in the name of Christ.

Will be back later on. Keep the faith!

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 02:29:21 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Video

There was an interview that Dompig gave on MSNBC where he said that Janssen was hoping to charge J2K with *felony assault* but the judge told her that there were too many *conflicting statements* to make that charge.

This is not the video Jossy is talking about, right?

Right, that is NOT the tape/video Jossy is talking about.


No ... no ... no ...

That is not even close to the tape.

Makes one wonder why the once lead cop has stated on tape that they have enough, yet nothing has been done .


Which reminds me that some claimed ALE had reason to arrest Mickey John and Abraham because they were in possession of things stolen from the MB kids.  The obvious followup question is "then why were they released?"  Glad they were released as suspects, but it's so frustrating that these rumors come out and nothing seems to come of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 02:34:38 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Just to let everyone know as I have seen some comments by some regarding Jossy interview. 95% of all conversations are never repeated. Is it used for background, yes. Some of the info comes out in subliminal posts, not verbatum. But to think that because others know about info only ,,, then you just have not followed where most all news on this story is broke on-line.

The reason why I asked Dana to have Jossy repeat the part about the Dompig video tape was to make sure everyone heard it. Sometimes we all go off on tangents in this case and do not hear what is being said. Not that it was a surprise to me, but because I did not want the point lost in all the other info.

The reason it was important? Because I was wondering when Jossy was going to ever make this public. I had been waiting for at least 5 months. I had heard of the video tape and what was on it. I would presume there is much more on it than Jossy stated last night.

However, the point being that Jossy Mansur let the cat out of the bag on Scared Monkeys that the tape existed after it being under wraps for so long.

There is much to this case that goes on behind the scenes that although I may be privy to, I cannot talk about as the point is to not just have people come to SM because I know something first that others may not.

Actually, at this point if all of you do not realize that when the news comes out, that we do not already know about it then many have not been following the case for the past 18 months.

Every so often I may hint at something but I will never say ... I know this, but you have to wait. A perfect example was when we posted back on July 21, 2006 not to get too comfortable and that you were still a suspect. We knew that De Vries was going to be investigating long before it ever became public and on and on.

I do appreciate Jossy for letting that news out on Scared Monkeys first during last nights interview with Dana.


RED ROCKS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 02:35:44 PM
Secret message to Leslie. Third ballot. Stepane Dion.
M and B I hope are gone. They are the dogs that have had their day.
CBC... where do the others go


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 02:35:46 PM
.
None,
Video tape is fine with me unless proven otherwise.  I just wish Jossy would release it.  I wish somebody would release something anyway.

Maybe waiting for KJ to leave but if I recall his paper named her Woman of the Year so not sure that's it.

Maybe when she is actually gone all sorts of information will be released from some who have been awaiting the new prosecuter.  

At least we can hope that happens.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2006, 02:40:57 PM
Be patient


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 02:41:57 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Anna"
I think slippers means loafers or docksiders or some sort of hard soled non tying leather shoe.  What I mean is these would be harder to walk to the casino in than the sneakers and usually have sort of slick soles, etc. just seems that since Joran was just in the casino the day before in sneakers this change would not be necessary and is even out of character for him.

.


You know, Anna, I never even believed him. Just another lie, but I wondered why? Or was he just amusing himself, telling this slipper lie?
Pathological liars actually start to beleive their own lies, but it is obvious that Joran likes to amuse himself.


Elaine, I think Joran likes misleading, lying, conning others and getting them to do what he wants, or watching them run in circles because of his lies.  If true, it backfired on him big time this time around.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 02:42:19 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Be patient


I have been Dana  :lol:  :lol: just weary !

Thank you for all you are trying to do for justice in this, thank you very much.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Dana on December 02, 2006, 02:43:58 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Dana"
Be patient


I have been Dana  :lol:  :lol: just weary !

Thank you for all you are trying to do for justice in this, thank you very much.


Like Red says there are things that may be going on behind the scenes that cant be discussed at this time, but when the time is right will be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 02:45:00 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Dana"
Be patient


I have been Dana  :lol:  :lol: just weary !

Thank you for all you are trying to do for justice in this, thank you very much.


Like Red says there are things that may be going on behind the scenes that cant be discussed at this time, but when the time is right will be.


i can live with that

thanks Dana


Dana ROCKS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 02:47:38 PM
WELL I will depart knowing good things are happening in good hands, and that it is a VIDEO  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 02, 2006, 02:48:09 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Be patient


Thank you :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 02:56:29 PM
I am a very patient person. Up to a point. And the point has passed last years with all of this. So, just TELL ME EVERYTHING on a public blog !!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 02:56:48 PM
I want to know why on earth the suspects that were capable of being charged with rape/kidnapping and getting 8 years for it aren't behind bars while the murder charges are being flushed out.

OK, I can be patient, too, but I can't help being curious.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 02:57:40 PM
Meant year. But 2007 is just next month.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 02:57:57 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know that Jossy had a tape, but Dompig has said this before.
The problem is that Joran told so many stories at different times that
how can they pick ONE out and make it stick ? Because he denied it later. And they have nothing but witness who were later suspects who constantly changed their stories. Without any sort of outside evidence,
with the only " evidence " coming from the prime suspect who recants,  
how can they lay the charges ?
..
The judge, don't know which one ( s ) was well aware of these stories and still let them out.


As Jossy said a long time ago: it's the judiciary at fault. I read some of what Rammerstein posted today in his frantic defense of the judges, and the poor guy doesn't even realize that he is defending tyrants and tyrannical behaviour. The judges totally rule there...they are mini-kings. No wonder Paulus wanted to become one. They have total power. Corruption reigns supreme


Is Rammstein one of Paulus' friends?  I have always thought so.


I also have wondered; Well, whoever he is, he is totally oblivious to the fact that a legal system which gives all powers to the judiciary, is a flawed legal system which gives no thought or consideration to the inherantly flawed human condition and it's many temptations, especially of those in high office. No wonder Aruba is as it is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:03:24 PM
I'm just musing out loud here, but if we take what Jossy said literally, all we have is that Dompig says he has enough to get a rape/kidnapping. This case has taught us all that all that means is that there is a statement by the one time chief investigator (video ot taped) with an opinion. Without the evidence to back that statement up, it's worthless. My question is ,"Based on what, and is it hard enough to stick?"

See the patience in that rant?  :lol: It's only the curiosity that comes through, right?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Sue on December 02, 2006, 03:07:05 PM

Dana
any chance you can get De Vries on the show??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:07:37 PM
Sorry, but I'm on a roll here................

I, too, feel that there is WAY ENOUGH circumstantial evidence to convict of rape, kidnapping, AND murder, but obviously the powers that be in Aruba, disagree. Wouldn't they just "disagree" with Dompig, too? Unless there is NEW evidence, it seems to me that Aruba's judicial system has already determined the veracity of existing evidence.

Does that make sense to anyone but me?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 03:11:32 PM
CBB, it makes sense to me too.  At this point I am wondering if we will be hearing that the case will be prosecuted in the Netherlands with Karin Janssen as the Head Prosecutor.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:13:10 PM
If somebody doesn't say something, I'll just keep talking.  :lol:

If the case to be made was against LE, then I agree, there is mounting hard evidence. The DeVries interview establishes progress in that direction. I'm looking for "stickable" evidence toward the perps, that Aruba hasn't already determined to ignore.

OK, I quit.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:15:34 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
CBB, it makes sense to me too.  At this point I am wondering if we will be hearing that the case will be prosecuted in the Netherlands with Karin Janssen as the Head Prosecutor.


It would be encouraging to hear that an Aruban or Caracau (sp?) judge would not have impact on anything. Wow, anybody other than a "friend of the family" would be good news.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 03:16:34 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
CBB, it makes sense to me too.  At this point I am wondering if we will be hearing that the case will be prosecuted in the Netherlands with Karin Janssen as the Head Prosecutor.


 :shock:

Yes, I am afraid any statement will be made out to have been made prior to some new evidence being brought forward that changes everything.  But I like this line of thought and there is legal precedent for Dutch having been tried and convicted in the NL for crimes committed in other countries.

Not sure this will ever happen but I do like the idea.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 03:18:38 PM
Well, if there is to be a follow-up DeVries television then we know there is more information that has not been made public.

Seems the information will eventually sift out just at a much slower pace than NH deserves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:19:56 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Well, if there is to be a follow-up DeVries television then we know there is more information that has not been made public.

Seems the information will eventually sift out just at a much slower pace than NH deserves.


The best thing KJ could do is to introduce DeVries as a witness, and then sit down and shut up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 03:25:29 PM
Well along with the perpetrator's being brought to account for their miserable deeds I am truly hoping that those who have been the corruption stalling this & hindering NH from having a proper burial & her family from receiving her back home are totally prosecuted & serve as long, if not a longer, sentence along with the guilty for as far as I am concerned they chose to become accomplices & deserve to be punished severely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 03:29:35 PM
Forgot to add:

PVDS is a Criminal NOT a Genius.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 02, 2006, 03:31:52 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Forgot to add:

PVDS is a Criminal NOT a Genius.


IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 03:37:30 PM
I'm just sorry that DeVries didn't get involved sooner.  We're on the clock and time is running out.  I believe he said he would be doing at least one follow-up show, possibly two.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 03:39:20 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
I followed the case of Laci Peterson & can recall that the sperm & egg donor's of the murderer wanted to publish a book of lies & NO PUBLISHER came forward with a deal for them as ALL THE PUBLISHERS KNEW THERE WOULD BE NO MARKET FOR THE LIES UTTERED BY SUPPORTER'S OF A MURDERER.


Thanks to Laci's wonderful mother and family and attorney and the California Legal System, for Scott Peterson to profit from murdering his wife, was not allowed. It was NOT due to any publisher's conscience. If only the magnificent Modesto Police had been in charge of Natalee's disappearance, we would not be here today and the case would have been solved and positively prosecuted. Instead we are all asked to rely on a legal system so foreign and so illusive,  that justice will never be served if the criminals have anything to do with it. Things are upside down on that stinking island called Aruba. But truth will out, no matter how arrogant those on Aruba are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 02, 2006, 03:43:14 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "memphis"
Peaches, how are you feeling?

Another day on the daisy side of the dirt.  Now that I have had my coffee and some Percoset, I am pretty good.  I'm nearly caught up here and that's always good.  So I'm getting psyched to watch the Huskers play Oklahoma tonite.  That should be a great game.  Such an old rivalry.

Are you still having bone pain?  :(

Yes.  It's very weird.  Comes and goes.  Usually happens in the big bones like femur, hips, back.  Percoset works well.

Have you talked with your onclogist about this pain yet? I'm worried, Peaches.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:43:28 PM
Merry Christmas, Anna!  :wink:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/AnnaSanta.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 02, 2006, 03:43:57 PM
That would be oncologist.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 02, 2006, 03:49:03 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Merry Christmas, Anna!  :wink:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/AnnaSanta.jpg)



Thanks so much, CBB!  I love it.   :D  :D  :D Yes, I am decorating both here and in real life at home!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:51:13 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Merry Christmas, Anna!  :wink:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/AnnaSanta.jpg)



Thanks so much, CBB!  I love it.   :D  :D  :D Yes, I am decorating both here and in real life at home!

.


LOL! I've got to get off here and get started. You didn't have to use it, feel free to replace without hurting my feelings, I was just looking at hats and thought it might work on your avatar.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 03:52:15 PM
BFN has posted the affadivit given by Helen LeJuez in the NY civil case. In the NH/Legal Docs section.

Don't know if this has been previously released...but it is interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 03:52:57 PM
See you guys later! Have a good one!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 03:57:18 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
BFN has posted the affadivit given by Helen LeJuez in the NY civil case. In the NH/Legal Docs section.

Don't know if this has been previously released...but it is interesting.

Yes, they were all part of JQK court documents that were available prior to the case being thrown out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 02, 2006, 03:58:00 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sorry, but I'm on a roll here................

I, too, feel that there is WAY ENOUGH circumstantial evidence to convict of rape, kidnapping, AND murder, but obviously the powers that be in Aruba, disagree. Wouldn't they just "disagree" with Dompig, too? Unless there is NEW evidence, it seems to me that Aruba's judicial system has already determined the veracity of existing evidence.

Does that make sense to anyone but me?



crazy...u r making sense to me...
:arrow: and i realize that may put u right over the line
 into loon-y-ville. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 02, 2006, 04:00:51 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Well along with the perpetrator's being brought to account for their miserable deeds I am truly hoping that those who have been the corruption stalling this & hindering NH from having a proper burial & her family from receiving her back home are totally prosecuted & serve as long, if not a longer, sentence along with the guilty for as far as I am concerned they chose to become accomplices & deserve to be punished severely.


WELL SAID.

Is there a cell big enough?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 04:05:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
BFN has posted the affadivit given by Helen LeJuez in the NY civil case. In the NH/Legal Docs section.

Don't know if this has been previously released...but it is interesting.

Yes, they were all part of JQK court documents that were available prior to the case being thrown out.

Thought that might be the case. Just scooting around cyberspace looking for info. :arrow:  Daniel posted a screenshot of the drug-allegation PV on FOB(from de Vries). You can't really read it but you can see the witness' has 4 names...4 long names. Less likely to be American?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 04:15:36 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Less likely to be American?

Reading further i see that it is very unlikely that it is an American...considering it is in PV form.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 04:18:08 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Well along with the perpetrator's being brought to account for their miserable deeds I am truly hoping that those who have been the corruption stalling this & hindering NH from having a proper burial & her family from receiving her back home are totally prosecuted & serve as long, if not a longer, sentence along with the guilty for as far as I am concerned they chose to become accomplices & deserve to be punished severely.


WELL SAID.

Is there a cell big enough?


toward that train of thought, don't you find it interesting all the outrage over the Oduber graves being vandalized, but not one ounce of outrage even when Dompig stated they felt her body had been moved several times, when it's Natalee's remains? Dompig stated it but with not one ounce of statement of disapproval of the severity of this compounding the perpetration - more like he was just pondering out loud about the puzzle? Does he have a soul that functions?

beats all.......selective conscience of the first degree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 04:30:44 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
We it may very well be audio/video.  Doesn't make much difference to me.  I'm sure we will find out soon enough. :wink:



How do you think we will find out, Klaas?  Do you think deVries will do a sequel and feature this tape/video?

Maybe when KJ leaves, the new prosecutor who takes her place might actually bring charges?  I think it is far too late for KJ to do so as any trial, etc. would be after her retirement, etc. so wouldn't make any sense.

She seems to be just running the clock out on her term in office and not likely to do any more at all.

I am hoping to see a whole different attitude from the one replacing her but only because it is something about which to be hopeful.  No real reason to think that and certainly not anything evidenced by past action in Aruba.

.


As a budget move, Aruba should just do away with the Prosecutor's Office altogether. It's been proven impotent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 04:39:28 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Afternoon monkeys.

Regarding the term "slippers," hubby spent many of his formative years on a small island and was trained never to wear his sandy outdoor shoes indoors. He buys shoes that look like something you would wear on a boat that he calls his "slippers" and changes into them from his outdoor shoes every time he comes into the house. What he calls slippers, though, don't look anything what I would think of as traditional slippers.


Mine are fuzzy and warm because it's cold here.  Not that anyone cares, but I can't picture Joran wearing them.  I just figured they were sandals or something.  Like delicious - something was lost in the translation - I have to believe that or I'll lose my lunch.   :shock:


 :lol: We'll probably learn someday that they were indeed, Mickey Mouse slippers that Santy gave him two years ago. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 02, 2006, 04:41:01 PM
Looked at the PV and magnified it but still can't tell. First Name looks like a Capital R.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 04:43:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
The ever wiley Dompig once admitted the suspects were guilty but then after his brother in law who lives in the bushes was released the last time from prison or whatever, he talked it over with his source Bouti, every reliable and clear of thought, and came to the conclusion that Natalee was heavily into drug use and possession.

He never got around to why and how she buried herself, dug herself up and relocated her remains but I am sure another consultation with Bouti might clear that all up as well.

Yes, I am being sarcastic but these people are like their jello laws, they change everything based on their current theory and agenda.  Around the same time Dompig was saying guilty he was in Aruba saying this well might be an insurance scam perpetrated by Beth.  Plays to his audience it would seem.

And now I see this in my immediate future

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/455rtb6_th.jpg)

but did want to leave ROBOTS the thought that maybe the sneakers (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/thththsneakersblack1.gif)
all on their own like this, lol.  I do wonder about the cut on Joran's foot being why he wore the slippers for it was reported on his arrest even ten days later so must have been sizeable.  Remember Beth said something about the way they were dressed being odd for having just been to the casino so maybe it was the footwear she questioned?

Like others, everything I say is just my opinion and means nothing.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/thWonderfulDay-1.gif)


Not only did Dompig say they were guilty, didn't we see ole Dompig say they were "Guilty as hell" about a year or so ago?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 04:47:10 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
BFN has posted the affadivit given by Helen LeJuez in the NY civil case. In the NH/Legal Docs section.

Don't know if this has been previously released...but it is interesting.

Yes, they were all part of JQK court documents that were available prior to the case being thrown out.

Thought that might be the case. Just scooting around cyberspace looking for info. :arrow:  Daniel posted a screenshot of the drug-allegation PV on FOB(from de Vries). You can't really read it but you can see the witness' has 4 names...4 long names. Less likely to be American?

Thanks, just got back home.  I've copied it and I'll see what I can read.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 04:52:38 PM
Can you post it here please, Klass ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 02, 2006, 04:59:12 PM
NONE-----

i think Dompig is trying to figure out how he can collect the reward and leave Aruba in one piece.

He is such slime

Hi to Red and Mrs.  

Prayers for the family.

Be good monkeys

Nite


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 05:06:59 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Can you post it here please, Klass ?


It's not a name of anyone we already have a PV on.  I cannot read it.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 05:09:43 PM
Thanks Klass. It probably reads: I. R. Boeti Boeti Boeti.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Cat on December 02, 2006, 05:11:38 PM
a few points,1-CBB,live long and prosper.2-People who met Dompiq here think he is competent,3-Dompiq's son is a pimp,4-hello to and go to see "The Nativity"5-I am sure this not a masonic thing,6-I think the answer will come soon and rapidly,and have a good one to the REDS and Klass.REMEMBER THE BLOOD CRIETH OUT FOR JUSTICE.cat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 02, 2006, 05:27:25 PM
As far as i can tell the de Vries program said this...

2 witnesses claim to have seen drug possesion (not usage).

The 1st witness (an Aruban) claims in a PV to have been offered drugs.

The 2nd witness unknown.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 05:36:19 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
a few points,1-CBB,live long and prosper.2-People who met Dompiq here think he is competent,3-Dompiq's son is a pimp,4-hello to and go to see "The Nativity"5-I am sure this not a masonic thing,6-I think the answer will come soon and rapidly,and have a good one to the REDS and Klass.REMEMBER THE BLOOD CRIETH OUT FOR JUSTICE.cat


Hi Cat!  I hope #6 is correct.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 02, 2006, 05:37:25 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Thanks Klass. It probably reads: I. R. Boeti Boeti Boeti.  :lol:


ding! ding! ding! post of the day  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 02, 2006, 05:40:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Altruist"
CBB, it makes sense to me too.  At this point I am wondering if we will be hearing that the case will be prosecuted in the Netherlands with Karin Janssen as the Head Prosecutor.


 :shock:

Yes, I am afraid any statement will be made out to have been made prior to some new evidence being brought forward that changes everything.  But I like this line of thought and there is legal precedent for Dutch having been tried and convicted in the NL for crimes committed in other countries.

Not sure this will ever happen but I do like the idea.

.


Geez, in the US a change of venue is usually requested of the court because of prejudice AGAINST a suspect.  Why are things backwards there?   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 05:40:42 PM
NEWSFLASH  --------  NEWS FLASH  --------  NEWSFLASH


BREAKING NEWS---------BREAKING NEWS ---BREAKING NEWS


it has been reported that DOCTOR EVIL may decide to take a SHOWER and WASH his HAIR !!!!!


he figures it may be one of the last times he takes a PRIVATE SHOWER
because in PRISON they make you take GROUP SHOWERS


this has been ROBOTS reporting


ROBOTS -OUT  :twisted:


 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 05:41:35 PM
Robots...you are too funny!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 05:44:09 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Robots...you are too funny!


there are two sides to every robot


the mechanical side and the mechanical side


 :twisted:  :twisted:

hi Mrs. Red!

were gonna get em all
when its all said and DONE 8)  


BET THE FARM or the SKATING RINK  (if you own one)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 05:45:08 PM
Robots!!  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 05:48:31 PM
Paulus has got to be sweating like an ELEPHANT

too bad the morons cant see the ELEPHANT sitting in the MIDDLE of TOILET ISLAND.....

just sitting there YELLING

JORAN DID IT

Joran DID IT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 05:51:09 PM
He was informed once again that there are direct friends that have explained that he has crapped on friends and asked them to lie about sexual activities with a girlfriend of his friends. These boys say that he takes them always in the maling (?) and manipulates.


man oh man

who in their RIGHT minds wants friends like this

goes the bathroom on his friends  ??????????????????????? :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


JORAN is a TOILET


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 05:55:25 PM
no kidding he definately adds a new meaning to the old adage about with friends like that who needs enemies?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 05:58:58 PM
if you want a real eye opener

the statement from satish on 6-13 is SKERRRRRRRRRRY

about how many times they all met and conjured up lie after lie after lie

yea, sure innocent people always meet and meet and meet and develope and change lies all the time  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 02, 2006, 05:59:32 PM
Quote from: "robots"
NEWSFLASH  --------  NEWS FLASH  --------  NEWSFLASH


BREAKING NEWS---------BREAKING NEWS ---BREAKING NEWS


it has been reported that DOCTOR EVIL may decide to take a SHOWER and WASH his HAIR !!!!!


he figures it may be one of the last times he takes a PRIVATE SHOWER
because in PRISON they make you take GROUP SHOWERS


this has been ROBOTS reporting


ROBOTS -OUT  :twisted:


 8)
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/1BILLIONFLORINSBIG.jpg) :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Ono on December 02, 2006, 06:02:35 PM
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 06:05:18 PM
After that Joran said to me: “Hey, look. If the police asks about it then we will just say we went away with the girl from Carlos & Charlies, that we did a bit of a road-trip, that he kissed and fingered her, that she fell asleep in the car, that we dropped her off at the Holiday Inn, that she had fallen down, that he had helped her up and that she walked off”. I said to Joran that it was OK, it was fine. Joran than said to me, let's go home. We then drove from the Wyndham Hotel to Joran's house.


THE WHOLE ROAD TRIP WAS A LIE  per joran

they went to JORANS HOUSE or someones HOUSE

LIAR LIAR YOUR STUPID MISSING SHOES are ON FIRE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 02, 2006, 06:06:03 PM
Robots and Carpe Noctem

I love you both!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:07:05 PM
Can I go on an off topic rant?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 06:07:12 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Robots and Carpe Noctem

I love you both!  :D


 we love you too  8)

well, i hate to speak for carpe, but i bet he does  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 06:07:34 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Can I go on an off topic rant?


please do

we love RANTS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 06:08:26 PM
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 06:11:30 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Can I go on an off topic rant?

Let's hear it Mrs. Red.  Get it off your chest.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:11:58 PM
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:13:39 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


I should probably add that Red and i attended our Christmas parade today... it was cute!  Then we hopped over to Church where they had hot chocolate and yummy cookies and stuff... to get warm.  SO I want CHRISTMAS on tv...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: oldfart on December 02, 2006, 06:13:48 PM
Good Day Monkeys  :D
Just making a post & run...

I love the Holiday season BUT hate fighting the Crowds !! :(

Have been listening to Dana's Pod Cast with Jossy !!

Makes one wonder  when the Aruba "House of Cards" falls (which it will) just how many will involved & how high it will run within the govt. of Aruba?

I will always Tip my Hat to Jossy for having a spine and fighting for the Turth to be Exposed for the people of Auba to see and ACT on...  but..

When the people(some)  can take to the streets to protest Beth's use of the word "Criminal" but NOT protest the actions of their Govt.  they become a bunch of spinless (http://www.gardensafari.net/pics/slakken/arion_hortensis_hsx_xxxx_t.jpg)...
One Happy - Slug Island

To Expose is one thing ~~
But whether those exposed are ever prosecuted is another thing.
It hate to say this  ... it will be up to the average person of Aurba (sigh) to demand accountability for the conspiracy for ALL involved.

I was glad to see ROB post again...
I do hope he is correct in that things may happen before the 1st of the year.. BUT  what ever happened to the supposed deep throat ?

Gotta Run and take a nap to get rid of my Mall Shopping Shock... :shock:
Keep the Faith
SeeeYaByeee

OldF


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 06:15:35 PM
On Tuesday two weeks ago, about 19.00 hours, I went to the house of Joran. Freddie was at the house of Joran. Joran had said to me that he had told Freddie the story about the Holiday Inn and also the truth. Joran had said only Freddy because he is my best friend. I had asked Joran if he did anything with/to* the girl. Joran had told us that he did not do anything with/to* the girl and that the girl had fallen asleep on the beach and that he had left her there. Freddie asked him why he had left his sport-shoes there. I do not know what Joran had said, but he came up with an excuse as to why he had and they he walked outside. Freddie then said to me in Papiamentu, "Eia hasi hopt coi pendew si di faga e mucha eynan" (loose translation by reporting officer. He has done a stupid thing leaving that girl alone on the beach). I answered Freddie that I told him the same thing. Every time we asked him about the shoes, he did not answer.

GUIDO has the shoes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 02, 2006, 06:17:14 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


If it makes you feel any better, I did get to watch White Christmas on TV the other night. (http://bestsmileys.com/comfort/2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:20:29 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


If it makes you feel any better, I did get to watch White Christmas on TV the other night. (http://bestsmileys.com/comfort/2.gif)


yes, but remember when we could see all versions of A CHRISTMAS CAROL?  I forgot in my rant the fact that they were showing Van Helsing, which was a great HALLOWEEN movie... it just kills me....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 06:20:52 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


I should probably add that Red and i attended our Christmas parade today... it was cute!  Then we hopped over to Church where they had hot chocolate and yummy cookies and stuff... to get warm.  SO I want CHRISTMAS on tv...


Why don't you rent a movie?  It's a Wonderful Life or something like that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:24:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


I should probably add that Red and i attended our Christmas parade today... it was cute!  Then we hopped over to Church where they had hot chocolate and yummy cookies and stuff... to get warm.  SO I want CHRISTMAS on tv...


Why don't you rent a movie?  It's a Wonderful Life or something like that?


well I actually own them all...  :lol:  I just like to see them on TV too...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 06:29:20 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


No one puts Mrs. Red in the Corner...

Rant whenever!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 06:30:46 PM
Mrs. Red-I put in one of my Christmas CD's this morning to try to get into the spirit of things.  It had:
Frosty the Snowman-Gene Autry (But I love the Burl Ives version)
White Christmas-Bing Crosby
Winter Wonderland-Perry Como
Little Drummer Boy-Rosemary Clooney
The Christmas Song-Nat King Cole
Have Yourself A Merry Christmas-Judy Garland
I'll Be Home For Christmas-Perry Como
Jingle Bells-Bing Crosby & The Andrews Sisters
Santa Claus is Comin' to Town-Nat King Cole

And of course the hammer dulcimer version of old Christmas songs :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:31:12 PM
SISTAH... ! How are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 06:34:05 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
SISTAH... ! How are you?


All decorated for Christmas here, having a few peeps over and gonna watch A CHRISTMAS STORY!  

HO HO HO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:34:26 PM
Muffy that sounds wonderful.... I have to tell y'all I love this movie ELF... which I don't have yet, and I love the JCPenny's commericals with the old home movies and the new ones...

considering all that is going on, I am very Christmasy this year....

 and Muffy the only song that is missing is "Run, Run Rudolf"...  :lol:  and one that I had never heard until I moved up here... Jacquie I know they play it in Jersey... but the Domminick the Italian Christmas Donkey.. I love that song, it's so cute.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 06:35:15 PM
I haven't heard the one about the Christmas Donkey.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:35:44 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
SISTAH... ! How are you?


All decorated for Christmas here, having a few peeps over and gonna watch A CHRISTMAS STORY!  

HO HO HO


Sounds like fun!  Love that movie.. and now that it's Christmas time I can say to RED...

wow wee a zepplin!!!  or oh it must be Italian, fragile.. it says fragile...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:36:57 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
I haven't heard the one about the Christmas Donkey.

It's cute.. I had never heard it before I moved here...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 06:40:16 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
SISTAH... ! How are you?


All decorated for Christmas here, having a few peeps over and gonna watch A CHRISTMAS STORY!  

HO HO HO


Sounds like fun!  Love that movie.. and now that it's Christmas time I can say to RED...

wow wee a zepplin!!!  or oh it must be Italian, fragile.. it says fragile...


I read that the house the movie was filmed in was turned into a museum by a huge fan of the movie..... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 06:45:27 PM
Just peeking in, but, Klaas? Don't you think Mrs. Red needs a Christmas package or something to "lean" on? There are probably better ones out there, but here's a couple to choose from..................

(I tried, but I couldn't make it work)  :oops:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmasgift.jpg)
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmasgift1.jpg)

It's the thought that counts, right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:46:55 PM
CBB that is a lovely idea... you look so glamorous in your Christmas attire, and I have to tell you that I still think of what you wrote last year regarding using Christmas instead of Happy Holidays... one of my favorite all time posts!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Cat on December 02, 2006, 06:52:39 PM
Mrs Red and to all.Merry Christmas and I just returned from a monkeys CHRISTMAS PARADE<I enjoyed.Cat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:53:34 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
Mrs Red and to all.Merry Christmas and I just returned from a monkeys CHRISTMAS PARADE<I enjoyed.Cat



You too Cat, Merry Christmas....

I should probably apologize to everyone ... I hijacked the thread :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 06:54:23 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Cat"
Mrs Red and to all.Merry Christmas and I just returned from a monkeys CHRISTMAS PARADE<I enjoyed.Cat



You too Cat, Merry Christmas....

I should probably apologize to everyone ... I hijacked the thread :oops:
:shock:  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 06:59:20 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Cat"
Mrs Red and to all.Merry Christmas and I just returned from a monkeys CHRISTMAS PARADE<I enjoyed.Cat



You too Cat, Merry Christmas....

I should probably apologize to everyone ... I hijacked the thread :oops:
:shock:  :D

 

I am sorry... but y'all did give me permission. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 06:59:45 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Just peeking in, but, Klaas? Don't you think Mrs. Red needs a Christmas package or something to "lean" on? There are probably better ones out there, but here's a couple to choose from..................

(I tried, but I couldn't make it work)  :oops:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmasgift.jpg)
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmasgift1.jpg)

It's the thought that counts, right?


Sure, I can work on it!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:00:51 PM
Thanks to Nonesuche for this gif to play with, lol  :lol:


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PURPLEPIMPS.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:03:51 PM
oooh-bobble heads!  And a booble head


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 07:04:25 PM
Red is taking me for food... that I don't have to cook... so I will be back later, and I promise to stay on topic...

good nite monkeys.....

Keep the faith, y'all!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 07:05:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thanks to Nonesuche for this gif to play with, lol  :lol:


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PURPLEPIMPS.gif)

Satish's head is so funny.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 02, 2006, 07:06:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thanks to Nonesuche for this gif to play with, lol  :lol:


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PURPLEPIMPS.gif)



ROFL I love it!



 :P


(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/joranSHOTJR.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 07:08:07 PM
:oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Mrs. Red, I don't remember the Christmas post, but I do have definite ideas about that. Glad you liked it!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 02, 2006, 07:09:57 PM
I've got to go to the grocery store................YUK! Check back in later.

Thank you Klaas...................you are so awesome, and never complain when somebody hits you up for something. I wub ya'!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:22:36 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Red is taking me for food... that I don't have to cook... so I will be back later, and I promise to stay on topic...

good nite monkeys.....

Keep the faith, y'all!!!


Mrs. Red - I know you've gone now but in case you come back after dinner, here is your Christmas avatar.  I emailed it to you as well. :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/mrsReddress2006xmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/mrsReddress2006xmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:25:03 PM
Klaas-that's very nice work!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:25:33 PM
IBE - I know it's early for you, but in case you read back, here is your avatar that you asked for last night.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/IBEavatar.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/IBEavatar.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 07:26:21 PM
Gee, how do you do that...and so quickly??  I was just looking at my son's photoshop...didn't know where to start.  

mrs. red's looks great.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:26:34 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Klaas-that's very nice work!

Thanks Muffy - I was lucky and found a good star to put in there!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 07:27:17 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Gee, how do you do that...and so quickly??  I was just looking at my son's photoshop...didn't know where to start.  

mrs. red's looks great.


 :lol:  :lol: Join the club.

Klaas is like the flash.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Gee, how do you do that...and so quickly??  I was just looking at my son's photoshop...didn't know where to start.  

mrs. red's looks great.

I've had 20 months practice  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:29:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Klaas-that's very nice work!

Thanks Muffy - I was lucky and found a good star to put in there!


I noticed the star.  It sets it all off beautifully.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 07:29:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Gee, how do you do that...and so quickly??  I was just looking at my son's photoshop...didn't know where to start.  

mrs. red's looks great.

I've had 20 months practice  :wink:


Yeah, I tried to play with a santa hat and got a message to rasterize it...wth?  I had to look it up in the index and gave up.  You are right practice.  Will have to get son to show me some stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 07:30:34 PM
I wonder if Kimberly Guilfoyle will have anything on the case tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:31:19 PM
Hi there "Mom" :)   I can't picture you in a rasta hat.  No dreads?!  I'm glad I'm not the only monkey that depends on a son for technical help  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 07:38:29 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Hi there "Mom" :)   I can't picture you in a rasta hat.  No dreads?!  I'm glad I'm not the only monkey that depends on a son for technical help  :D


Hi, MuffyBee.  I'm not too technically challenged after 10 years on a job that required it, but don't have any experience with photoshop, and have spent minimal time attempting to learn it.  Have watched my son superimpose VPs heads on CA governor's body & friend's on Hulk, etc...for laughs....He learned all this stuff in High School & college.

San, not sure what will be on...have Fox on now, though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:38:43 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Gee, how do you do that...and so quickly??  I was just looking at my son's photoshop...didn't know where to start.  

mrs. red's looks great.


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/2njbowxmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/2njbowxmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:43:55 PM
I was just sitting here wondering what in the world it's going to take to get justice for Natalee.  We've been up and down, up and down.  There is still hope.  There is always hope.  And Mr. Red says to be patient.  And Dana said to be patient.  And so we will be.  I just can't help but wonder what the real truth is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:49:57 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/BeeforSMxmas.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/BeeforSMxmas.jpg

Hard to fit a hat on that little bee's head, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 07:51:10 PM
Thanks, Klaas.  I like this better than Santa in the porcelain pool...otherwise known as Robots T word... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 07:54:27 PM
Howdy Monkey Folks~!!


CARPE  ROFL.. I had to skip a page to laugh at your photo!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:55:01 PM
Oh my!  Thank you Klaas.  I didn't expect such a treat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 07:55:03 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Howdy Monkey Folks~!!


CARPE  ROFL.. I had to skip a page to laugh at your photo!!


Hi, Angie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 07:55:33 PM
Klaas can you fit a hat on my hat. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 07:55:35 PM
Klaas.. I think this may be the first tie ever I asked .. do you stil have my Christmas avi from  last year? LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 07:55:39 PM
You're welcome 2NJ and Muffy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 07:55:58 PM
Hi Angie :)   Are you getting into the spirit of Christmas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 07:56:18 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Howdy Monkey Folks~!!


CARPE  ROFL.. I had to skip a page to laugh at your photo!!


Hi, Angie.


  Hey Sweety~!! How are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 07:56:57 PM
Quote from: "San"
Klaas can you fit a hat on my hat. :lol:


 ROFL  Howdy Piezon twin !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 07:58:31 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Hi Angie :)   Are you getting into the spirit of Christmas?


 Hi Muffy. well we had music on in the store all day. so kinda put mein the spirit. I  dont have a tree up yet or one gift bought. :( Been busy at work.. and we decorated there even.. LOL    
  I bet its nice for you to be back in the states to celebrate!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 07:58:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Gee, how do you do that...and so quickly??  I was just looking at my son's photoshop...didn't know where to start.  

mrs. red's looks great.

I've had 20 months practice  :wink:


Heh, heh, I've had 10yrs practice and can't do stuff like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 07:59:59 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Howdy Monkey Folks~!!


CARPE  ROFL.. I had to skip a page to laugh at your photo!!


Hi, Angie.


  Hey Sweety~!! How are you?


Hanging in, Angie.  Was out most of the afternoon, visiting my Dad, and caught up a bit ago.  Have read you've been busy, as well.   We're all still waiting for the other shoe to drop  :shock: with this case, heh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 08:02:16 PM
Hi Carnut.  I am wondering what I'm gonna do when my teenaged son leaves home.  How in the world will I know what to do with the computer when I get stuck.  Or the DVD player and cable tv.  I will be paralyzed... :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:02:56 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Howdy Monkey Folks~!!


CARPE  ROFL.. I had to skip a page to laugh at your photo!!


Hi, Angie.


  Hey Sweety~!! How are you?


Hanging in, Angie.  Was out most of the afternoon, visiting my Dad, and caught up a bit ago.  Have read you've been busy, as well.   We're all still waiting for the other shoe to drop  :shock: with this case, heh?


 Definatley 2NJ.. and IF  something comes out on the 15th. it will be big.. wont solve the case.. but will make Dompig looks REALLY REALLY bad! As if he dont already!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 08:03:38 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "San"
Klaas can you fit a hat on my hat. :lol:


 ROFL  Howdy Piezon twin !!

Hey Angie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 08:04:40 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Hi Carnut.  I am wondering what I'm gonna do when my teenaged son leaves home.  How in the world will I know what to do with the computer when I get stuck.  Or the DVD player and cable tv.  I will be paralyzed... :(


Have more kids? Grand Children?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:05:04 PM
Be back in a few.. :(  Gotta run down the street for ciggys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 08:06:02 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Hi Carnut.  I am wondering what I'm gonna do when my teenaged son leaves home.  How in the world will I know what to do with the computer when I get stuck.  Or the DVD player and cable tv.  I will be paralyzed... :(


Have more kids? Grand Children?


Bite your tongue!! :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 08:10:56 PM
I was just strolling through a few of the forums about Natalee and came across a pic of the VDS compound.  The first thing that really stuck out to me is that the shed/dog house behind Joran's apartment is not there.  Does anyone know when this pic was taken? http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2006, 08:11:45 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Hi Carnut.  I am wondering what I'm gonna do when my teenaged son leaves home.  How in the world will I know what to do with the computer when I get stuck.  Or the DVD player and cable tv.  I will be paralyzed... :(


Windows XP allows remote access.  You just give him permission.  Then he can fix your computer from wherever he is (Chicago, LA..).  The calls about cable etc are a little harder (especially if he's in a class or at work).  It can be embarrasing to get an emergency "mom" call...or so I've been told.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 08:13:09 PM
I took another look at it.  It is the pic where the furniture truck is at the house.  Does anyone remember the date????  Why'd they get rid of that shed and why?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 02, 2006, 08:13:45 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I was just strolling through a few of the forums about Natalee and came across a pic of the VDS compound.  The first thing that really stuck out to me is that the shed/dog house behind Joran's apartment is not there.  Does anyone know when this pic was taken? http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm


I think that was posted last week...Klaas noticed a couple other things changed.  Think it was photoshopped.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 08:14:04 PM
San  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanxmas2006.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanxmas2006.jpg

Angie  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angiexmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angiexmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:14:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
San  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanxmas2006.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanxmas2006.jpg

Angie  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angiexmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angiexmas.gif


 BACk  and Klaas  ROFL  TY so much.. I knew youd have it!! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 08:15:22 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I took another look at it.  It is the pic where the furniture truck is at the house.  Does anyone remember the date????  Why'd they get rid of that shed and why?


All the things missing in that picture were photoshopped out (very badly I might add)  Take a close look at it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 02, 2006, 08:16:29 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Hi Carnut.  I am wondering what I'm gonna do when my teenaged son leaves home.  How in the world will I know what to do with the computer when I get stuck.  Or the DVD player and cable tv.  I will be paralyzed... :(


Windows XP allows remote access.  You just give him permission.  Then he can fix your computer from wherever he is (Chicago, LA..).  The calls about cable etc are a little harder (especially if he's in a class or at work).  It can be embarrasing to get an emergency "mom" call...or so I've been told.  :wink:


Thank you Buckeye.  Remote access.  Interesting.  Having my kiddo bail me out of trouble instead of vice-versa... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:16:52 PM
TY Klaas  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 08:16:55 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I was just strolling through a few of the forums about Natalee and came across a pic of the VDS compound.  The first thing that really stuck out to me is that the shed/dog house behind Joran's apartment is not there.  Does anyone know when this pic was taken? http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm


I think that was posted last week...Klaas noticed a couple other things changed.  Think it was photoshopped.


Do you know where the orginial pic is?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 08:19:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I took another look at it.  It is the pic where the furniture truck is at the house.  Does anyone remember the date????  Why'd they get rid of that shed and why?


All the things missing in that picture were photoshopped out (very badly I might add)  Take a close look at it.


The neighbor's house and monkey cage is missing.  Thanx, Klaas


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 08:20:21 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I was just strolling through a few of the forums about Natalee and came across a pic of the VDS compound.  The first thing that really stuck out to me is that the shed/dog house behind Joran's apartment is not there.  Does anyone know when this pic was taken? http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm


I think that was posted last week...Klaas noticed a couple other things changed.  Think it was photoshopped.


Do you know where the orginial pic is?


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdshomelg-1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 08:20:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
San  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanxmas2006.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanxmas2006.jpg

Angie  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angiexmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/angiexmas.gif

Thanks Klaas it looks great.  Let me put it on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 02, 2006, 08:22:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I was just strolling through a few of the forums about Natalee and came across a pic of the VDS compound.  The first thing that really stuck out to me is that the shed/dog house behind Joran's apartment is not there.  Does anyone know when this pic was taken? http://judicial-inc.biz/Joran_va_der_sloot.htm


I think that was posted last week...Klaas noticed a couple other things changed.  Think it was photoshopped.


Do you know where the orginial pic is?


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/vdshomelg-1.jpg)


Thanx; thought for a minute I was loosing my mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 08:28:33 PM
Hey, Monkeys!  How is everyone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 02, 2006, 08:29:53 PM
RiehlWorldView posted the photo on July 31, 2005

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/unusual_activit.html

My question: Who photoshopped it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 08:30:50 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
RiehlWorldView posted the photo on July 31, 2005

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/unusual_activit.html

My question: Who photoshopped it?


Someone who isn't very good at photoshop  :wink:  :lol:   Yes, why did they??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:33:41 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Hey, Monkeys!  How is everyone?

  Hey Casa  nice to see you!! Did your girls wedding take place yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 02, 2006, 08:34:07 PM
June 2005

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/joranapt-3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 08:37:38 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey, Monkeys!  How is everyone?

  Hey Casa  nice to see you!! Did your girls wedding take place yet?


Thanks, Angie, it is nice to be here for a little while!  The wedding was Nov. 11 and it was wonderful!  Everything went well and they are back from their honeymoon and settled in as newlyweds!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 08:39:21 PM
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 08:40:42 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...


Let me see if I can do something for you  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:42:13 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey, Monkeys!  How is everyone?

  Hey Casa  nice to see you!! Did your girls wedding take place yet?


Thanks, Angie, it is nice to be here for a little while!  The wedding was Nov. 11 and it was wonderful!  Everything went well and they are back from their honeymoon and settled in as newlyweds!


 Congrats Casa~!!  :)   Glad to hear it all went well~!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:43:03 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...

 
 Hey Cubee!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 08:46:39 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
particularly when Anna does one  8)


Yes, Anna's rants are very well spoken... and since you gave me permission here it goes.

WHAT KIND OF BONEHEADS work for the networks?  I mean we have the family Disney channel promoting the 25 days of Christmas and starting it off with Harry Potter.... and on every channel there is NOTHING for the season except USA which is showing ELF...

but then they showed a commerical for a reality show called dirty dancing... JIMMY DAMN CRICKETS... can't any of these over paid over hyped people have an original thought?

Rant over... but good grief! :twisted:


If it makes you feel any better, I did get to watch White Christmas on TV the other night. (http://bestsmileys.com/comfort/2.gif)


yes, but remember when we could see all versions of A CHRISTMAS CAROL?  I forgot in my rant the fact that they were showing Van Helsing, which was a great HALLOWEEN movie... it just kills me....




Mrs. Red, I just send off a box of Christmas videos that my son almost wore out when he was younger to my little nephew in Illinois, if you had spoken up sooner I would have been happy to send you a few :wink:
My son was the first boy born in my family in almost 15 years and the UPS man knew my address well.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 08:46:53 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey, Monkeys!  How is everyone?

  Hey Casa  nice to see you!! Did your girls wedding take place yet?


Thanks, Angie, it is nice to be here for a little while!  The wedding was Nov. 11 and it was wonderful!  Everything went well and they are back from their honeymoon and settled in as newlyweds!


 Congrats Casa~!!  :)   Glad to hear it all went well~!!  :)


Thanks, Angie!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 08:47:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...


Let me see if I can do something for you  :wink:



I have faith in ya klaas... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 08:48:18 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...

 
 Hey Cubee!  :)



Hey angie!!! Looking good :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Mere on December 02, 2006, 08:50:18 PM
Klaas....are my ears too big for some Christmas...?   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:52:43 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...

 
 Hey Cubee!  :)



Hey angie!!! Looking good :wink:


  ROFL~! I am gonna go out tonight. First time in a long time.. :)
Band dont start  for another hour or so. and its right up the street from my house..  Hope I dont get myself in trouble.. LMAO!  :shock:
  Meeting a few people there  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 08:55:38 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...

 
 Hey Cubee!  :)



Hey angie!!! Looking good :wink:


  ROFL~! I am gonna go out tonight. First time in a long time.. :)
Band dont start  for another hour or so. and its right up the street from my house..  Hope I dont get myself in trouble.. LMAO!  :shock:
  Meeting a few people there  :)


Angie, you have a wonderful time!  Kick up your heels!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 08:57:39 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...

 
 Hey Cubee!  :)



Hey angie!!! Looking good :wink:


  ROFL~! I am gonna go out tonight. First time in a long time.. :)
Band dont start  for another hour or so. and its right up the street from my house..  Hope I dont get myself in trouble.. LMAO!  :shock:
  Meeting a few people there  :)


Angie, you have a wonderful time!  Kick up your heels!


  ROFL Casa.. I plan on it... havnt done that since my daughters wedding!
Hubby is out hunting..  Im tired of sitting in the house!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 08:59:04 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...

 
 Hey Cubee!  :)



Hey angie!!! Looking good :wink:


  ROFL~! I am gonna go out tonight. First time in a long time.. :)
Band dont start  for another hour or so. and its right up the street from my house..  Hope I dont get myself in trouble.. LMAO!  :shock:
  Meeting a few people there  :)


Angie, you have a wonderful time!  Kick up your heels!


  ROFL Casa.. I plan on it... havnt done that since my daughters wedding!
Hubby is out hunting..  Im tired of sitting in the house!!  :)


I understand!  I'm by myself but I am watching the Arkansas/Florida football game.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 09:02:58 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Good evening monkeys, I fear I am underdressed for the holidays...


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cubbeexmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cubbeexmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 09:04:01 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....are my ears too big for some Christmas...?   :D

Hmmm, good question.  I'll see what I can do. May have to cover your ears  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 09:05:44 PM
Quote from: "casa"


I understand!  I'm by myself but I am watching the Arkansas/Florida football game.



 Who is winning??   Hope ARK for you and CUZ!!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 09:10:32 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"


I understand!  I'm by myself but I am watching the Arkansas/Florida football game.



 Who is winning??   Hope ARK for you and CUZ!!!  :)


haha thanks Angie.  Right now ARK is losing by 10 but 9 minutes to go.  The score has been back and forth so who knows who will win!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 09:10:49 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas....are my ears too big for some Christmas...?   :D


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Merexmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Merexmas.gif

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Mere on December 02, 2006, 09:11:21 PM
anyone having to log in repeatedly...?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 09:12:08 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
anyone having to log in repeatedly...?

Delete your cookies then make your you check the box to stay logged in.

Edited to add - remember sometimes AOL users have that problem for some reason.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 09:13:27 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"


I understand!  I'm by myself but I am watching the Arkansas/Florida football game.



 Who is winning??   Hope ARK for you and CUZ!!!  :)


haha thanks Angie.  Right now ARK is losing by 10 but 9 minutes to go.  The score has been back and forth so who knows who will win!


 YIKES! Well hope there is a turn around for you guys!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Mere on December 02, 2006, 09:31:13 PM
I love it Klaas...it has attitude..... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 09:32:58 PM
klaas rocks!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 02, 2006, 09:36:07 PM
Hiya Monkeys

All you Christmas Monkeys are looking good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 09:38:25 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

All you Christmas Monkeys are looking good.


How are ya yapperz1?  Isn't everyone looking festive!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 09:39:08 PM
Hey monkeys! Howz my monkey loves?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 09:39:29 PM
Klaas is keeping us dressed well for the holidays... :lol:

Angie, have a good time when you go out tonight.  

Hi, everyone.  Been away for a while talking to family members on the phone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 02, 2006, 09:40:09 PM
Casa I am doing great, how about you?
Looking very festive in the cage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 09:40:13 PM
Casa, I wanna be presentable for the holidays. Wonder if Klaas can hook me up <hint, hint....>  :o


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 02, 2006, 09:42:31 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Klaas is keeping us dressed well for the holidays... :lol:

Angie, have a good time when you go out tonight.  

Hi, everyone.  Been away for a while talking to family members on the phone.


  TY 2NJ  heading out in a few!!  Have a great night all and
HUGS to NEMO for LALAS!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 02, 2006, 09:44:22 PM
Hiya Mishy & 2NJ


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 09:44:49 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Casa I am doing great, how about you?
Looking very festive in the cage.


I'm doing just fine, yapperz1!  Got the tree put up today and children are coming home tomorrow to help me decorate it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 09:45:28 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Casa, I wanna be presentable for the holidays. Wonder if Klaas can hook me up <hint, hint....>  :o


I bet Klaas can fix you right up!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 09:45:57 PM
Hey Yapz, Ang, Cubbee, Klaas Casa, 2N!!!!  :lol: And anyone else I may have left out...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 09:46:35 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Hey Yapz, Ang, Cubbee, Klaas Casa, 2N!!!!  :lol: And anyone else I may have left out...


Good to see you mishy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: sb on December 02, 2006, 09:47:19 PM
I can't just keep it on the Football Thread!

SEC!  :D

I am one happy Gator tonight!

You Arkansas fans have NOTHING to be ashamed of, y'all played a GREAT game and scared me to death. Good job!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 09:48:58 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I can't just keep it on the Football Thread!

SEC!  :D

I am one happy Gator tonight!

You Arkansas fans have NOTHING to be ashamed of, y'all played a GREAT game and scared me to death. Good job!


Thanks sb!  It was some kind of game!  Congratulations to you and the other Gators!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 09:49:12 PM
Hey sb...How's your folks? How's your dad? I read your folks were in an accident and you've all been in my prayers...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 09:50:38 PM
Hiya mere, mishy, yap and everyone else......
Thanks for hooking me up klaas....
I love it!.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 09:50:46 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Casa, I wanna be presentable for the holidays. Wonder if Klaas can hook me up <hint, hint....>  :o


You are going to be a little more difficult.  I'll have to figure something out though..

Give me about 10 minutes  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 09:52:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mishy"
Casa, I wanna be presentable for the holidays. Wonder if Klaas can hook me up <hint, hint....>  :o


You are going to be a little more difficult.  I'll have to figure something out though..

Give me about 10 minutes  :wink:


Thanks Klaas...I'm always difficult...not a surprise to you, I'm sure  :shock:


Hey My Memere!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 09:58:50 PM
Did I run everybody off????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: sb on December 02, 2006, 09:59:27 PM
Everyone is doing better now, still a little sore but recovering. The news about the cancer is good too, it is greatly reduced.  

Thanks to all of you who have been asking! I haven't posted much about that  because I am trying to add to the Natalee discussion as much as I can when I do get to be in here. I see everyone's a little off-topic tonight...

I have been communicating some with none about the situation w/ her son who plays for Alabama. This is understandably a tough situation for them when a coaching change gets made like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 02, 2006, 10:01:20 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Everyone is doing better now, still a little sore but recovering. The news about the cancer is good too, it is greatly reduced.  

Thanks to all of you who have been asking! I haven't posted much about that  because I am trying to add to the Natalee discussion as much as I can when I do get to be in here. I see everyone's a little off-topic tonight...

I have been communicating some with none about the situation w/ her son who plays for Alabama. This is understandably a tough situation for them when a coaching change gets made like that.



Glad to hear that everyone is doing better sb....
It really is a tough situation for the team....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 10:01:53 PM
It does seem to be a bad situation for the kids at Alabama.  When these things happen it seems to have the most effect on them.  Hopefully everything will get better for them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: sb on December 02, 2006, 10:01:55 PM
mishy, you are one of the ones who'll be hearing from me soon about an idea I have. All our Birmingham Monkeys have hung in there in a big way and I'm glad that we have a loyal group that supports Beth and the family. I would like to see us do more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:02:32 PM
So glad the CA is reduced Sb...and that your parents weren't hurt bad in the accident....I have thought about Noneson a lot too...it's gotta be hard on him and the other players...We are for Auburn, and my mom really feels bad for him...I never thought I'd hear her say that either!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:03:38 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Mishy & 2NJ


Hiya, back at yapperz1....trying to keep tabs on Rutgers game & here... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:05:10 PM
Wishing everyone a happy evening....

Robots:

At one time were you being awakened by a noisy singing bird that you wanted to "get rid of"?

Thank you. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:06:39 PM
Quote from: "sb"
mishy, you are one of the ones who'll be hearing from me soon about an idea I have. All our Birmingham Monkeys have hung in there in a big way and I'm glad that we have a loyal group that supports Beth and the family. I would like to see us do more.


So would I sb. Please contact me when you come up with something!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:07:58 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Wishing everyone a happy evening....

Robots:

At one time were you being awakened by a noisy singing bird that you wanted to "get rid of"?

Thank you. :lol:


If that's the case, was he the one who was supposed to go to the island, but we never got a report?   Or am I confusing who was annoyed by that bird...mmmm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 10:08:16 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Wishing everyone a happy evening....

Robots:

At one time were you being awakened by a noisy singing bird that you wanted to "get rid of"?

Thank you. :lol:


Heh, heh, read back aways Jacque, Rob posted a couple posts on the subject.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:09:17 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Wishing everyone a happy evening....

Robots:

At one time were you being awakened by a noisy singing bird that you wanted to "get rid of"?

Thank you. :lol:


If that's the case, was he the one who was supposed to go to the island, but we never got a report?   Or am I confusing who was annoyed by that bird...mmmm


I'm not sure, I'm just trying to figure out who he is.  :oops:

How are you tonight??? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:09:38 PM
Hey Jacqueline Ballerina!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:10:13 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Wishing everyone a happy evening....

Robots:

At one time were you being awakened by a noisy singing bird that you wanted to "get rid of"?

Thank you. :lol:


Heh, heh, read back aways Jacque, Rob posted a couple posts on the subject.


Yeah I think you're right...

Damn!  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:10:31 PM
sb, glad all is going well with family.  Know here first hand what it's like to juggle life at home with parents in need.  Blessings to you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:11:12 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Hey Jacqueline Ballerina!


Sweet Mishy, how are you this fine evening?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 10:13:34 PM
Here's Rob's post Jacque

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/posting.php?mode=quote&p=83033


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:14:52 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Wishing everyone a happy evening....

Robots:

At one time were you being awakened by a noisy singing bird that you wanted to "get rid of"?

Thank you. :lol:


If that's the case, was he the one who was supposed to go to the island, but we never got a report?   Or am I confusing who was annoyed by that bird...mmmm


I'm not sure, I'm just trying to figure out who he is.  :oops:

How are you tonight??? :lol:


He's funny as all get out, and I'm fine, thank you. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 10:16:51 PM
Ah phooey

Here's Rob's post Jacque

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/posting.php?p=83033

bottom of the page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:19:21 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Ah phooey

Here's Rob's post Jacque

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/posting.php?p=83033

bottom of the page.


I read it earlier, Carnut, when catching up....link isn't working for me, though.  It must be the system cuz you have too much technical experience... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Cat on December 02, 2006, 10:20:44 PM
Good luck sb on the ca.Hey Mishy,good luck also.I live in the area also.CAT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:21:10 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Ah phooey

Here's Rob's post Jacque

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/posting.php?p=83033

bottom of the page.


I read it earlier, Carnut, when catching up....link isn't working for me, though.  It must be the system cuz you have too much technical experience... :wink:


Hey MOM Go Rutgers!

Carnut:  The link brought me right to the actual post a reply screen, but I read it, thanks...

Yeah I know it's not Rob now, but I know this Robots...

And if anyone out there knows is former handle I would be much obliged, cause I keep doin that alphabet thing in my head trying to figure it out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:21:15 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mishy"
Hey Jacqueline Ballerina!


Sweet Mishy, how are you this fine evening?


I'm OK, but about to have to put my wee one to bed...and she ain't gonna be happy bout dat!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 10:21:48 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Ah phooey

Here's Rob's post Jacque

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/posting.php?p=83033

bottom of the page.


I read it earlier, Carnut, when catching up....link isn't working for me, though.  It must be the system cuz you have too much technical experience... :wink:


Heh, heh, believe me, I probably make more mistakes than anyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:22:13 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mishy"
Hey Jacqueline Ballerina!


Sweet Mishy, how are you this fine evening?


I'm OK, but about to have to put my wee one to bed...and she ain't gonna be happy bout dat!!


5 more minutes, Mom...pleeeeeeeeeeeeeze....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:22:55 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
Good luck sb on the ca.Hey Mishy,good luck also.I live in the area also.CAT


I know you do Cat...Good to see ya!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:24:01 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "mishy"
Hey Jacqueline Ballerina!


Sweet Mishy, how are you this fine evening?


I'm OK, but about to have to put my wee one to bed...and she ain't gonna be happy bout dat!!


5 more minutes, Mom...pleeeeeeeeeeeeeze....


If only she'd ask like that Jacquie...she knows I'm putty in her hands  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 10:27:59 PM
Mishy - I haven't forgotten about you, just having problems making your avatar festive.  Still working on it!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:29:34 PM
Thanks sweet Klaas...You can take off the yellow ribbon for right now, if that'll help...I hate to say that, but ya'll know where my loyalty lies!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 10:30:54 PM
ok...klass....add to your work load......i know you have a chistmas avatar of me somewhere in your bag of tricks! :lol:
sorry....monkeys i am a little down tonight....and sb is rubbing it in :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 02, 2006, 10:31:52 PM
Ola my dear cuz!!!!!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Wub  you!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:39:31 PM
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2006/12/02/america/NA_GEN_US_Philanthropist_Charged.php

Joe Mammana being investigated for tax evasion by Feds.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 10:39:50 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
ok...klass....add to your work load......i know you have a chistmas avatar of me somewhere in your bag of tricks! :lol:
sorry....monkeys i am a little down tonight....and sb is rubbing it in :?


heycuz!  That was really a heartstopping game!  They need another good receiver!  I know one they looked at but they didn't offer and he went to UCA!  I'm waiting for next year when he shows what he is made of! (red shirted this year) :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 02, 2006, 10:40:21 PM
LESLIE:  I'm looking into the Ruth Dijkhoff "at the bank"

Whether she works there or
Is the Ruth that passed away

Roberto Dijkhoff is an officer at the CMB bank

Also in June 2005...3 Werleman males passed away

The "Werleman Family" owns the Lighthouse Restaurant
and Caribbean Resorts Hotel.....on Palm Beach Road....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 10:42:59 PM
Hi monkeys...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 10:43:57 PM
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:44:55 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!


You look stunning!
I love it... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 10:46:21 PM
They just showed a picture of JVDS On The Line Up with a preview of tomorrows show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 10:46:51 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 10:48:24 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Ola my dear cuz!!!!!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Wub  you!!!!!


hey MISHY!!!!

buenos noches...spell? lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 10:49:00 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
ok...klass....add to your work load......i know you have a chistmas avatar of me somewhere in your bag of tricks! :lol:
sorry....monkeys i am a little down tonight....and sb is rubbing it in :?


Here's your old Christmas one  :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/thecuzxmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/thecuzxmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:49:36 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


I've been flipping back and forth from the Rutgers game to Kimberley's show...thanks, San.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 10:49:47 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Oh good!  Was affraid you wouldn't be back in the forum tonight!  Glad you like it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:50:39 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


I've been flipping back and forth from the Rutgers game to Kimberley's show...thanks, San.


Oh Ito missed it... :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 02, 2006, 10:52:22 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


I've been flipping back and forth from the Rutgers game to Kimberley's show...thanks, San.

They were talking about Joran's lawyer being on tape saying that Joran had something to do with Natalee's disappearance.  It will be on tomorrow show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 10:54:14 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!


You look great Mrs. Red!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 02, 2006, 10:54:23 PM
Hi monkeys.  Congrats to SB!  You're team played great.  I have enjoyed all the games today, since I didn't have a dog in the fight.  It's easier on my nerves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 10:54:26 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


I've been flipping back and forth from the Rutgers game to Kimberley's show...thanks, San.

They were talking about Joran's lawyer being on tape saying that Joran had something to do with Natalee's disappearance.  It will be on tomorrow show.


Good.  The girls gone wild segment had me reeling, tonight.

Jacquie, overtime!!!  (sorry, for the OT, but it's a NJ new thing)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 10:55:22 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


I've been flipping back and forth from the Rutgers game to Kimberley's show...thanks, San.

They were talking about Joran's lawyer being on tape saying that Joran had something to do with Natalee's disappearance.  It will be on tomorrow show.


Good.  The girls gone wild segment had me reeling, tonight.

Jacquie, overtime!!!  (sorry, for the OT, but it's a NJ new thing)


 :wink:  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 10:56:47 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!


You look great Mrs. Red!


Thanks Y'all... I owe it all to Klaasend and CBB...  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 10:59:11 PM
Jac and 2NJ...  I have been pulling for them for both of you... and I always say to Red that my sistah's alma mattah (sp???) is doing so well...

Cuz, I was soooooooooooo bummed... sorry SB, wanted to see Cuz prevail...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:01:09 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Jac and 2NJ...  I have been pulling for them for both of you... and I always say to Red that my sistah's alma mattah (sp???) is doing so well...

Cuz, I was soooooooooooo bummed... sorry SB, wanted to see Cuz prevail...


Thanks, mrs. red....we all have our family ties, sotospeak...heh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:01:56 PM
THANKS klaas....need to get in the christmas spirit!
thanks mrs red....yes...i am depressed...but will always be a hog fan not matter what! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:02:44 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Jac and 2NJ...  I have been pulling for them for both of you... and I always say to Red that my sistah's alma mattah (sp???) is doing so well...

Cuz, I was soooooooooooo bummed... sorry SB, wanted to see Cuz prevail...


Thanks, mrs. red....we all have our family ties, sotospeak...heh?


yes, even if they are my monkey family :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:03:38 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
THANKS klaas....need to get in the christmas spirit!
thanks mrs red....yes...i am depressed...but will always be a hog fan not matter what! :lol:


just do some shopping, that should fix you right up!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:04:52 PM
2nd OT...and yes, mrs. red....even IF it's your monkey family... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 11:05:43 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend... thank you so much... I look so festive!!

Looks great mrs. red.


I've been flipping back and forth from the Rutgers game to Kimberley's show...thanks, San.

They were talking about Joran's lawyer being on tape saying that Joran had something to do with Natalee's disappearance.  It will be on tomorrow show.


Good.  The girls gone wild segment had me reeling, tonight.

Jacquie, overtime!!!  (sorry, for the OT, but it's a NJ new thing)


Humm, I wonder if those girls gone wild commercials late night are the reason I stayup so late now a days?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:06:43 PM
2nd OT...

It's never easy, is it! LOL

Carnut:  

I don't think so... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:06:44 PM
i will get right on it mrs red....lol....after all i have 2 college girls to shop for...lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:08:27 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"

Humm, I wonder if those girls gone wild commercials late night are the reason I stayup so late now a days?


You are here and there....guessing yuo are sorting out family & friends...but what do I know.

Rutgers just scored a touchdown.  ooolala....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:08:59 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
i will get right on it mrs red....lol....after all i have 2 college girls to shop for...lol


just sounds like fun... doesn't it??  

Congrats to Jac and 2NJ....seems like y'all about to have a great nite...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:09:04 PM
only second ot?        ark has the record....7 ot's...and in second with 2 6 ot's.....talk about heart failure!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:10:50 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thecuz"
i will get right on it mrs red....lol....after all i have 2 college girls to shop for...lol


just sounds like fun... doesn't it??  

Congrats to Jac and 2NJ....seems like y'all about to have a great nite...


it does....beth went shopping with my girls thanksgiving :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:11:28 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
only second ot?        ark has the record....7 ot's...and in second with 2 6 ot's.....talk about heart failure!


In 2000 or 2001 Rutgers lost to WVU 80-7.

We need this!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:11:33 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
only second ot?        ark has the record....7 ot's...and in second with 2 6 ot's.....talk about heart failure!


With all due respect, when you haven't been there, it doesn't matter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 11:12:48 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Humm, I wonder if those girls gone wild commercials late night are the reason I stayup so late now a days?


You are here and there....guessing yuo are sorting out family & friends...but what do I know.

Rutgers just scored a touchdown.  ooolala....


Huh? Was that addressed to me? Fraid I don't understand or get it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:15:09 PM
Heading for OT # 3.

Has Widge likes to say:

SIS BOOM BAH....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:16:16 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Humm, I wonder if those girls gone wild commercials late night are the reason I stayup so late now a days?


You are here and there....guessing yuo are sorting out family & friends...but what do I know.

Rutgers just scored a touchdown.  ooolala....


Huh? Was that addressed to me? Fraid I don't understand or get it.


Dunno, Carnut...it made sense to me when I posted it...if it doesn't makes ense to you, just disregard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:16:32 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thecuz"
i will get right on it mrs red....lol....after all i have 2 college girls to shop for...lol


just sounds like fun... doesn't it??  

Congrats to Jac and 2NJ....seems like y'all about to have a great nite...


it does....beth went shopping with my girls thanksgiving :cry:


That has to be so hard on her, and at the same time I know she loves your girls....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:17:10 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Heading for OT # 3.

Has Widge likes to say:

SIS BOOM BAH....


Yupperz...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:17:28 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "thecuz"
only second ot?        ark has the record....7 ot's...and in second with 2 6 ot's.....talk about heart failure!


With all due respect, when you haven't been there, it doesn't matter.


What are they babbling about Tony Soprano?  that's weird... LOL...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 11:18:16 PM
Yay!  I finally got my Christmas kitties to work!  

Cuz, that was sweet of your girls to go shopping with her!  I know it had to mean a lot to her and them also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:18:32 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
2nd OT...and yes, mrs. red....even IF it's your monkey family... :lol:


but I love my monkey family.... I truly do!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 11:19:32 PM
Mishy - I'm having problems getting the colors to stay right but this is what I have so far:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Mishy1avatarxmas3.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Mishy1avatarxmas3.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:20:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Mishy - I'm having problems getting the colors to stay right but this is what I have so far:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Mishy1avatarxmas3.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Mishy1avatarxmas3.gif


Klaasend you definately out did yourself... that's great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 02, 2006, 11:21:28 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Humm, I wonder if those girls gone wild commercials late night are the reason I stayup so late now a days?


You are here and there....guessing yuo are sorting out family & friends...but what do I know.

Rutgers just scored a touchdown.  ooolala....


Huh? Was that addressed to me? Fraid I don't understand or get it.


Dunno, Carnut...it made sense to me when I posted it...if it doesn't makes ense to you, just disregard.


Well shucky darn, now ya got me all sorts of curious. What's going on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:22:50 PM
OMG this game is making me mental. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:23:57 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG this game is making me mental. :roll:

Right... they need to be playing rice a little more... they need to pull this out...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:24:27 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG this game is making me mental. :roll:

Right... they need to be playing Rice a little more... they need to pull this out...


self edit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:26:04 PM
This whole endless review garbage is making me mad.... :twisted:  nothing like messing up the team momentum...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:28:01 PM
What a crying shame. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:28:27 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
This whole endless review garbage is making me mad.... :twisted:  nothing like messing up the team momentum...


Oh Jacq and NJ... that stinks... I am so sorry.....I was hoping for that history for y'all...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:29:05 PM
me too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:29:20 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
This whole endless review garbage is making me mad.... :twisted:  nothing like messing up the team momentum...


Oh Jacq and NJ... that stinks... I am so sorry.....I was hoping for that history for y'all...


Dang, now I am on to cheering for Peaches and Frijole... and that's not a good thing either. :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:29:57 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
me too


you look so charming...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:32:29 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thecuz"
me too


you look so charming...


why thank you scarlet! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:32:38 PM
Oh Mrs.

SNL Nancy Grace skit on NOW


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:32:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thecuz"
me too


you look so charming...


I love the Christmas spirit in the cage ... it's so festive!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:34:28 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Oh Mrs.

SNL Nancy Grace skit on NOW


K... I have to say that Amy Polhler has the worst "Southern" accent  I have ever heard....  :lol:  but it's funny...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:35:21 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Oh Mrs.

SNL Nancy Grace skit on NOW


K... I have to say that Amy Polhler has the worst "Southern" accent  I have ever heard....  :lol:  but it's funny...


You should hear MY southern accent.
I think i have it down pat!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 11:36:22 PM
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:37:14 PM
Yeah, bummer...Rutgers lost to WV....but they set a record.  Good for them.

Carnut, if you are up late watching whatever, it's not my beeswax, so I guess I was just trying to figure it out in my way....it makes no difference...maybe I just think you are lonesome, and you can be that with family & friends at times.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:40:23 PM
OMG>>> they mentioned JVDS on SNL... although Red and I are sitting here disagreeing on the meaning... I say the mention is a good thing and he says that they were bagging on NG... and that it was as SB would say a NY thing that they don't think it's worth covering...

IMO, the idea that he is mentioned means that at least people are aware of what happened...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:41:43 PM
Quote from: "casa"
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


did you do something to make her mad?  I can't imagine that you would .... so maybe she just is multitasking and just didn't see you...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 02, 2006, 11:41:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OMG>>> they mentioned JVDS on SNL... although Red and I are sitting here disagreeing on the meaning... I say the mention is a good thing and he says that they were bagging on NG... and that it was as SB would say a NY thing that they don't think it's worth covering...

IMO, the idea that he is mentioned means that at least people are aware of what happened...


missed it... :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:43:47 PM
Klaasend, are you still in the cage?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 11:44:46 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "casa"
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


did you do something to make her mad?  I can't imagine that you would .... so maybe she just is multitasking and just didn't see you...


don't think I did anything. :?   can't believe they mentioned jvds on saturday night live. i missed it.  i was channel surfing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 11:45:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend, are you still in the cage?


yes :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:47:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend, are you still in the cage?


yes :lol:


I just want to say that if you have your aim up... there are some cranky people  :?  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:47:58 PM
Quote from: "casa"
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


i am not mad at you! why would you think that?
like mrs red. said....i am going back and forth ...multi tasking!!!!
i hate that i missed the snl thing!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 11:49:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend, are you still in the cage?


yes :lol:


I just want to say that if you have your aim up... there are some cranky people  :?  :lol:  :lol:

My AIM is up??  Who's cranky?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:50:37 PM
ROBOTS - in the CAGE  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 11:50:39 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "casa"
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


i am not mad at you! why would you think that?
like mrs red. said....i am going back and forth ...multi tasking!!!!
i hate that i missed the snl thing!


i'm going back and forth myself and flipping channels on the tv too.  we are gonna have to make a date for lunch or dinner maybe during Christmas break.  If "number 3" is home we might let her go!  She can be our driver   :wink: haha


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: thecuz on December 02, 2006, 11:51:49 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "casa"
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


i am not mad at you! why would you think that?
like mrs red. said....i am going back and forth ...multi tasking!!!!
i hate that i missed the snl thing!


i'm going back and forth myself and flipping channels on the tv too.  we are gonna have to make a date for lunch or dinner maybe during Christmas break.  If "number 3" is home we might let her go!  She can be our driver   :wink: haha


it's a date...when she is home...give me a call!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:52:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Klaasend, are you still in the cage?


yes :lol:


I just want to say that if you have your aim up... there are some cranky people  :?  :lol:  :lol:

My AIM is up??  Who's cranky?


my better half...  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:53:08 PM
Quote from: "robots"
ROBOTS - in the CAGE  :twisted:

hey mr roboto...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 11:53:30 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "casa"
:cry: I think cuz is mad at me.


i am not mad at you! why would you think that?
like mrs red. said....i am going back and forth ...multi tasking!!!!
i hate that i missed the snl thing!


i'm going back and forth myself and flipping channels on the tv too.  we are gonna have to make a date for lunch or dinner maybe during Christmas break.  If "number 3" is home we might let her go!  She can be our driver   :wink: haha


it's a date...when she is home...give me a call!


I will!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 11:53:37 PM
Mrs. Red - are you saying I should shut down my AIM, LOLOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 02, 2006, 11:54:35 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
LESLIE:  I'm looking into the Ruth Dijkhoff "at the bank"
Whether she works there or is the Ruth that passed away
Roberto Dijkhoff is an officer at the CMB bank
Also in June 2005...3 Werleman males passed away
The "Werleman Family" owns the Lighthouse Restaurant
and Caribbean Resorts Hotel.....on Palm Beach Road....

If she is the same woman, I would like to know what was the cause of her death on June 18, 2005 at 50 years of age.; not old age but illness or an accident? We see no PV from the Ruth Dijkhoff who is the only witness who can attest to Paul's bank story and is named in his June 23rd suspect statement.   The Monday, May 30th banking of Paul's is not mentioned in his June 18th declaration and he can't even remember if he went home for lunch.
If it is the same woman, then Paul must have known by June 23rd that she had died making his memory recall suspect.   Maybe Rita Werleman e.v. Dijkhoff (maid) is Ruth's sister in law or sister depending on what e.v. means.  Could it mean "nee" as in maiden name?  
Did this Ruth work at the bank or was doing her own banking? She was healthy enough to be out and about on the 30th of May but dead on the 18th of June at the age of 50 (if Paul's story is true).
Then, we have the connection with the funeral home owned by Yolanda Wever, who may be related to Guido Wever.  Ruth Dijkhoff's funeral was in Germany but was her body sent or her ashes?
I would be very interested to read her obituary.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 02, 2006, 11:54:35 PM
klaas can you send me an e mail? I want to ask you something.  Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:54:58 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
ROBOTS - in the CAGE  :twisted:

hey mr roboto...



hi, i think just figured something out

i went like this went the actuator went off in my metal head   :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 02, 2006, 11:56:18 PM
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Mata ah-oo hima de
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Himitsu wo shiri tai


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 02, 2006, 11:56:20 PM
Quote from: "casa"
klaas can you send me an e mail? I want to ask you something.  Thanks!

Casa, I'll never find your email address.  Why don't you email me at smklaasend@hotmail.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:56:25 PM
maybe im smarter than i even thought i was  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:57:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Mrs. Red - are you saying I should shut down my AIM, LOLOL  :lol:



it's like Forrest, run Forrest RUN... LOL... yep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 02, 2006, 11:58:24 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Mata ah-oo hima de
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Himitsu wo shiri tai


i met them once

i was pumping gasoline when i was 16 years old

i pumped gas at a gas station and they came driving in on a tour bus  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 02, 2006, 11:58:44 PM
Quote from: "robots"
maybe im smarter than i even thought i was  8)


well then you just figured out what we all knew...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 03, 2006, 12:00:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "casa"
klaas can you send me an e mail? I want to ask you something.  Thanks!

Casa, I'll never find your email address.  Why don't you email me at smklaasend@hotmail.com


just sent one


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:00:34 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Mata ah-oo hima de
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Himitsu wo shiri tai


i met them once

i was pumping gasoline when i was 16 years old

i pumped gas at a gas station and they came driving in on a tour bus  :shock:


Cool. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 03, 2006, 12:01:11 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Yeah, bummer...Rutgers lost to WV....but they set a record.  Good for them.

Carnut, if you are up late watching whatever, it's not my beeswax, so I guess I was just trying to figure it out in my way....it makes no difference...maybe I just think you are lonesome, and you can be that with family & friends at times.


Ok, thanks, I appreciate that, yep, your kinda right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:02:01 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
maybe im smarter than i even thought i was  8)


well then you just figured out what we all knew...


im really not very smart but thanks  :D youre the best

ok , give me a minute

here it comes

On you question how can I explain this, I will answer you the following:
How Joran and the missing girl walked immediately onto the beach. If Joran went in another direction afterwards, that I would not know because Deepak and I immediately drove away.


JORAN was never at any freaking BEACH

he used GUIDO's Car  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

guido was working and JORAN used his car

REPEAT

REPEAT

REPEAT

he used the car while guido was working

the came back and guido drove him home

the K2 brother as much as said so

 :shock:  


thats why GUIDO left the COUNTRY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:03:04 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Mata ah-oo hima de
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Himitsu wo shiri tai


i met them once

i was pumping gasoline when i was 16 years old

i pumped gas at a gas station and they came driving in on a tour bus  :shock:


Cool. 8)


tommy shaw was real coooooool

dennis de young would not even say HELLO :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:

i stilll have the guitar pick  8) they gave me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:03:12 AM
I love Jack Black, but Mrs...that just blew chunks...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:04:26 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Mata ah-oo hima de
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Himitsu wo shiri tai


i met them once

i was pumping gasoline when i was 16 years old

i pumped gas at a gas station and they came driving in on a tour bus  :shock:


Cool. 8)


tommy shaw was real coooooool

dennis de young would not even say HELLO :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:

i stilll have the guitar pick  8) they gave me


What a great Momento!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 03, 2006, 12:06:12 AM
You're the best Klaasend!  Thanks a bunch!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 12:07:54 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Ono"
Can you post it here please, Klass ?


It's not a name of anyone we already have a PV on.  I cannot read it.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine2.jpg)


I'm guessing four long names mean probably not Dutch?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 12:08:02 AM
Quote from: "casa"
You're the best Klaasend!  Thanks a bunch!

No problem!  All taken care of now!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:10:21 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Mata ah-oo hima de
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto,
Himitsu wo shiri tai


i met them once

i was pumping gasoline when i was 16 years old

i pumped gas at a gas station and they came driving in on a tour bus  :shock:


Cool. 8)


tommy shaw was real coooooool

dennis de young would not even say HELLO :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:

i stilll have the guitar pick  8) they gave me


What a great Momento!   :lol:



yea, a 3 cent  guitar pick

course, i was the only one working that morning ( sunday )
so nobody believed me until it was reported in the papers a coupel days later when the band was seen eating in a local restaurant


the same gas station two other memorable events happened to me


i was held up at gunpoint the guy said give me all your money and i said

"hell, i will carry the safe to your car for you"  8)


and then a pedophile older man tried to convince me that he was a famous guy from canada and i should come up there to visit him..

>shaking head<   i asked him i could bring my .44 with me 8)
in case i wanted to shoot something

and i called the police, the police checked him out and escorted him to the border

needless to say... i didnt like working there

geeeeeeeeeeees, that guy was creeeeeepy

he told me i looked like KING TUT wehn king tut was little
 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 12:10:31 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
OMG>>> they mentioned JVDS on SNL... although Red and I are sitting here disagreeing on the meaning... I say the mention is a good thing and he says that they were bagging on NG... and that it was as SB would say a NY thing that they don't think it's worth covering...

IMO, the idea that he is mentioned means that at least people are aware of what happened...


Yes! Whoohoo! JVDS in an SNL skit shows that everyone knows!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 03, 2006, 12:14:48 AM
hey justinsmama!  how have you been doing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 12:18:15 AM
OH Klaas! I've just started back reading, but had to jump forward to tell you that you've done a superb job decorating the cage!

Mre. Red is BEE-UTIFUL! LOVE the star; makes the whole thing just perfect! The "bee" hat took skill and is soooo cute! San's hat just pops out at you and says, Merry Christmas! I'm sure there are others, but I got in a hurry to tell you the cage looks GREAT!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:19:18 AM
OMG Robots...

That's very scary, both of those incidents.... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:20:13 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG Robots...

That's very scary, both of those incidents.... :shock:


i know

i dont which once was worse

the robber or the pedophile  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 12:21:37 AM
Quote from: "casa"
hey justinsmama!  how have you been doing?


I be good! How you be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 03, 2006, 12:22:50 AM
Good night Monkeys...

keep the faith... and CBB, if you are still here - can I tell you that I loved your post last year about saying Merry Christmas... I still remembering...

Jaq... can't say that I can hang with SNL tonight.. I have only laffed twice...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:22:53 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG Robots...

That's very scary, both of those incidents.... :shock:


i know

i dont which once was worse

the robber or the pedophile  :evil:


I dunno, they are both awful.
But that pedophile thing creeped me out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 03, 2006, 12:23:35 AM
I be just great! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mrs. red on December 03, 2006, 12:23:56 AM
night y'all....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:24:25 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG Robots...

That's very scary, both of those incidents.... :shock:


i know

i dont which once was worse

the robber or the pedophile  :evil:


I dunno, they are both awful.
But that pedophile thing creeped me out.


my mother wanted to kill the guy

he had pictures of ME             :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:
taken from across the road

HORROR MOVIE Stuff,,, if you aske me

and teh KING TUT stuff

i dont look a thing like him  :twisted: really i dont


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: casa on December 03, 2006, 12:24:32 AM
night mrs red


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 12:28:00 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
night y'all....


Nite Mrs. Red - I'll be sure to catch SNL and see what they say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 03, 2006, 12:32:05 AM
Hey all Monks, Stopping in for a late night howdy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:33:09 AM
Robots, that is insane.
I dont blame your mom for wanting to strangle that perv.

All kidding aside, I'm glad nothing happened to you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:36:01 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Robots, that is insane.
I dont blame your mom for wanting to strangle that perv.

All kidding aside, I'm glad nothing happened to you.


thanks
me too  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:44:04 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Robots, that is insane.
I dont blame your mom for wanting to strangle that perv.

All kidding aside, I'm glad nothing happened to you.


thanks
me too  8)



I had a creep bother me once when I was about 8 or 9.
Of all places, I was in church waiting to in for confession.

A guy in back of me kept hitting me with his rosary beads, and whispering stuff in my ear.  Scared me so much, but I just kept sitting there, I was just a kid and all I knew was I had to go to confession.

My mom was waiting for me in the car and when my brother and me came out I told her what happened.  (after we got home though)  She told me right then and there if anything were to happen like that again, get away from the situation and run like hell....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Hotshot on December 03, 2006, 12:44:58 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Florida"
LESLIE:  I'm looking into the Ruth Dijkhoff "at the bank"
Whether she works there or is the Ruth that passed away
Roberto Dijkhoff is an officer at the CMB bank
Also in June 2005...3 Werleman males passed away
The "Werleman Family" owns the Lighthouse Restaurant
and Caribbean Resorts Hotel.....on Palm Beach Road....

If she is the same woman, I would like to know what was the cause of her death on June 18, 2005 at 50 years of age.; not old age but illness or an accident? We see no PV from the Ruth Dijkhoff who is the only witness who can attest to Paul's bank story and is named in his June 23rd suspect statement.   The Monday, May 30th banking of Paul's is not mentioned in his June 18th declaration and he can't even remember if he went home for lunch.
If it is the same woman, then Paul must have known by June 23rd that she had died making his memory recall suspect.   Maybe Rita Werleman e.v. Dijkhoff (maid) is Ruth's sister in law or sister depending on what e.v. means.  Could it mean "nee" as in maiden name?  
Did this Ruth work at the bank or was doing her own banking? She was healthy enough to be out and about on the 30th of May but dead on the 18th of June at the age of 50 (if Paul's story is true).
Then, we have the connection with the funeral home owned by Yolanda Wever, who may be related to Guido Wever.  Ruth Dijkhoff's funeral was in Germany but was her body sent or her ashes?
I would be very interested to read her obituary.


All I can say about this is, whoaaaaaa.  I think that needs to be looked into!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:47:27 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Robots, that is insane.
I dont blame your mom for wanting to strangle that perv.

All kidding aside, I'm glad nothing happened to you.


thanks
me too  8)



I had a creep bother me once when I was about 8 or 9.
Of all places, I was in church waiting to in for confession.

A guy in back of me kept hitting me with his rosary beads, and whispering stuff in my ear.  Scared me so much, but I just kept sitting there, I was just a kid and all I knew was I had to go to confession.

My mom was waiting for me in the car and when my brother and me came out I told her what happened.  (after we got home though)  She told me right then and there if anything were to happen like that again, get away from the situation and run like hell....



yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 12:48:02 AM
Hotshot - I'm trying to go through internet archives right now looking for how she died.  No luck so far.  The information has already been sent to De Vries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 12:48:48 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
maybe im smarter than i even thought i was  8)


well then you just figured out what we all knew...


im really not very smart but thanks  :D youre the best

ok , give me a minute

here it comes

On you question how can I explain this, I will answer you the following:
How Joran and the missing girl walked immediately onto the beach. If Joran went in another direction afterwards, that I would not know because Deepak and I immediately drove away.


JORAN was never at any freaking BEACH

he used GUIDO's Car  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

guido was working and JORAN used his car

REPEAT

REPEAT

REPEAT

he used the car while guido was working

the came back and guido drove him home

the K2 brother as much as said so

 :shock:  


thats why GUIDO left the COUNTRY




Do you know where Guido's car was parked?  

Did Joran say SHE did not walk through the hotel, meaning the Marriott to get to the HI Casino to get the keys?  Or do you think he already had them or Guido left them in the car under a mat or something?

The new car or the one he might have had before?  White car on the beach seen by the fishermen for about half an hour?  Do you think that was Guido's car?

I think it was a white Suzuki they said they saw?  Do we know what kind of new car Guido had?

Very interesting.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 12:51:33 AM
Anna your Merry Christmas is lovely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Hotshot on December 03, 2006, 12:54:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Hotshot - I'm trying to go through internet archives right now looking for how she died.  No luck so far.  The information has already been sent to De Vries.


Klaas, I am really glad to hear its been sent to him.  I see nothing either.  Thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 12:55:18 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Florida"
LESLIE:  I'm looking into the Ruth Dijkhoff "at the bank"
Whether she works there or is the Ruth that passed away
Roberto Dijkhoff is an officer at the CMB bank
Also in June 2005...3 Werleman males passed away
The "Werleman Family" owns the Lighthouse Restaurant
and Caribbean Resorts Hotel.....on Palm Beach Road....

If she is the same woman, I would like to know what was the cause of her death on June 18, 2005 at 50 years of age.; not old age but illness or an accident? We see no PV from the Ruth Dijkhoff who is the only witness who can attest to Paul's bank story and is named in his June 23rd suspect statement.   The Monday, May 30th banking of Paul's is not mentioned in his June 18th declaration and he can't even remember if he went home for lunch.
If it is the same woman, then Paul must have known by June 23rd that she had died making his memory recall suspect.   Maybe Rita Werleman e.v. Dijkhoff (maid) is Ruth's sister in law or sister depending on what e.v. means.  Could it mean "nee" as in maiden name?  
Did this Ruth work at the bank or was doing her own banking? She was healthy enough to be out and about on the 30th of May but dead on the 18th of June at the age of 50 (if Paul's story is true).
Then, we have the connection with the funeral home owned by Yolanda Wever, who may be related to Guido Wever.  Ruth Dijkhoff's funeral was in Germany but was her body sent or her ashes?
I would be very interested to read her obituary.


All I can say about this is, whoaaaaaa.  I think that needs to be looked into!



So this woman perhaps dies inbetween statements and Paulus just decides she was the very one that he spoke to at the bank.  Just like Joran, Paulus can make a designer lie, too.

IF this is the same woman.

Yeah. . . . that's the ticket!!   :evil:


This is as bad as Joran using Natalee's disappearance to enhance his own reputation as a card player by lying that he won money back for her when nothing of the sort happened for Natalee or any of the MB students.  He didn't win back anything but did think that part of the story to make it appear that he did was good press for himself.

He also knew Natalee wouldn't be returning to contradict him, too.  

 :evil:

It really doesn't fall far from the tree, does it?   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 12:57:29 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Anna your Merry Christmas is lovely.



Thank you, Jacquie.  Not totally in the Christmas spirit yet but working on it!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 12:58:55 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "robots"
maybe im smarter than i even thought i was  8)


well then you just figured out what we all knew...


im really not very smart but thanks  :D youre the best

ok , give me a minute

here it comes

On you question how can I explain this, I will answer you the following:
How Joran and the missing girl walked immediately onto the beach. If Joran went in another direction afterwards, that I would not know because Deepak and I immediately drove away.


JORAN was never at any freaking BEACH

he used GUIDO's Car  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

guido was working and JORAN used his car

REPEAT

REPEAT

REPEAT

he used the car while guido was working

the came back and guido drove him home

the K2 brother as much as said so

 :shock:  


thats why GUIDO left the COUNTRY




Do you know where Guido's car was parked?  

Did Joran say SHE did not walk through the hotel, meaning the Marriott to get to the HI Casino to get the keys?  Or do you think he already had them or Guido left them in the car under a mat or something?

The new car or the one he might have had before?  White car on the beach seen by the fishermen for about half an hour?  Do you think that was Guido's car?

I think it was a white Suzuki they said they saw?  Do we know what kind of new car Guido had?

Very interesting.   :wink:


hello Anna

i dotn kwno where it was parked

but i do know that new cars and well actually almost all cars can have more than one set of KEYS  8)

Joran could easily had a set of the keys


guido doesnt need a car handy if he is working why not let his boyfriend
( JORAN ) use it

no need to worry about driver licenses

they let the kids break every other rule

know what i mean  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 03, 2006, 01:00:04 AM
Anna wrote;
Quote
So this woman perhaps dies inbetween statements and Paulus just decides she was the very one that he spoke to at the bank. Just like Joran, Paulus can make a designer lie, too.

Wouldn't the bank have a surveillance video?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 01:00:18 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Anna your Merry Christmas is lovely.



Thank you, Jacquie.  Not totally in the Christmas spirit yet but working on it!

.


I know me either....Doesn't help that it was 70 degrees yesterday.

But we'll get there... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:04:36 AM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 01:10:42 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Hotshot - I'm trying to go through internet archives right now looking for how she died.  No luck so far.  The information has already been sent to De Vries.

Klaas, I am really glad to hear its been sent to him.  I see nothing either.  Thanks

Me three.  I have found nothing.  Just need to see the original obituary for one of the Aruban newspapers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 01:10:49 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Anna wrote;
Quote
So this woman perhaps dies inbetween statements and Paulus just decides she was the very one that he spoke to at the bank. Just like Joran, Paulus can make a designer lie, too.

Wouldn't the bank have a surveillance video?



Probably BB but no one ever seems to look at them except Beth.  They then record over them or something.  Darnedest thing I ever saw but none of the tapes that are there were ever confiscated.  I would think McDonalds would have one as well as several other places but we have heard nothing of any of this.

Dunno why but think just no one ever bothered to check.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 01:10:51 AM
In what way was JVDS mentioned on SNL ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 03, 2006, 01:16:05 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Anna wrote;
Quote
So this woman perhaps dies inbetween statements and Paulus just decides she was the very one that he spoke to at the bank. Just like Joran, Paulus can make a designer lie, too.

Wouldn't the bank have a surveillance video?



Probably BB but no one ever seems to look at them except Beth.  They then record over them or something.  Darnedest thing I ever saw but none of the tapes that are there were ever confiscated.  I would think McDonalds would have one as well as several other places but we have heard nothing of any of this.

Dunno why but think just no one ever bothered to check.


It's true, I'm sure you are right....it's more likely they wouldn't have one.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:26:17 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In what way was JVDS mentioned on SNL ?

Not sure, it's not on here yet..not for about an hour.  I'll watch and report tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 01:29:56 AM
I wonder about the picture of Frances Bird (sp) and Natalee with the PV in Dutch that talks about Natalee offering cocaine to someone.  Is that a clue as to who the person is giving the declaration?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 01:30:44 AM
Klaas; here's one if sb wants it. I'm just playing around trying to learn Photoshop. There's got to be an easier way!!!

Whew; how on earth do you do it???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 01:31:30 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/monkeysb-largecopy.jpg)

FORGOT TO PASTE!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:32:18 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I wonder about the picture of Frances Bird (sp) and Natalee with the PV in Dutch that talks about Natalee offering cocaine to someone.  Is that a clue as to who the person is giving the declaration?

No, according to Daniel who posted it they were showing several photos of Natalee with her friends.  The fact that Frances is in that one means nothing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:33:09 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/monkeysb-largecopy.jpg)

FORGOT TO PASTE!!  :lol:


Wow - that turned out great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 01:33:41 AM
Klaas:  I understand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:39:58 AM
Leslie - the general concensus, even at the pro-Joran sites is that it's most likely a witness statement from an Aruban.  My guess is someone paid to give a false witness statement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 01:46:17 AM
I have been looking at the website for the CMB bank :
Annual report 2005:  
http://www.cmbnv.com/pics/arg/2005/CMBAnnRep05.pdf
The Lion Path?
Board of Directors:
http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
Management (pictures):
http://www.cmbnv.com/management.php
Locations:
http://www.cmbnv.com/locations.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on December 03, 2006, 01:48:07 AM
Hello everyone! Just wanted to say that ya'll look so cute in your Christmas clothes :D
I saw the movie "Blood Diamond" tonight, great movie! It is violent though, so if you don't like seeing 9 years shooting people with AK47s then don't go see it :shock:  :evil:
Big thanks to Dana for all he's doing!!!
I've got the 15th circled on my calander with fingers crossed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:53:09 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I have been looking at the website for the CMB bank :
Annual report 2005:  
http://www.cmbnv.com/pics/arg/2005/CMBAnnRep05.pdf
The Lion Path?
Board of Directors:
http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
Management (pictures):
http://www.cmbnv.com/management.php
Locations:
http://www.cmbnv.com/locations.php


ROFLMAO - what is this?  Typo or is this how they refer to Arlene's husband?  :lol:

Board of Directors

Chairman Lionel Capriles II

Lionel Capriles
Ronald Gomes Casseres
William H.L. Fabro
Shaffie Wihby
Basilio Kelly
Elbert R. Arends
Jose M. Laclé
Anthony da Costa Gomez
mr. Arlene Shipper


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 01:55:47 AM
Klaas:   I saw that! :lol:
CMB’s Noord Branch is located in one of the fastest developing residential areas on Aruba, close to the high-rise hotels and many restaurants. With its experience in traditional Commercial and Personal Banking, this branch expertly caters to the needs of larger businesses as well as to the individual consumer.
Available services:
• Complete ATM and Teller Services
• Drive-through Banking
• Night Deposit Facility
• Safe Deposit Boxes
Divisions located in the Noord Branch:
• Bankcard Division
• Insurance Division
• Investment Division

Hours:

Full Service
Monday to Friday 8:00 am to 4:00 pm


Drive-through
Monday to Thursday 9:00 am to 5:00 pm
Friday 8:00 am to 6:00 pm

Walk-up tellers
Monday to Thursday 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm
Friday 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm[/u]--
If these are the same hours as in June 2005, Paul could have done his banking at 8 AM.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 01:57:00 AM
CMB Bank in Noord:
http://www.cmbnv.com/noord.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:01:13 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 02:07:33 AM
GOODNIGHT!  Arlene Shippers was NOT on the Board of Dirctores in 2004.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 02:08:52 AM
DOG ON LAP = Spelling mistakes :oops: Directors


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: dkpen on December 03, 2006, 02:48:19 AM
Hi everyone!

Ugh, I'm becoming a late night poster again.  :?  Need sleep!  LOL

1. The witness on the letter must be female and married unless the male took on both mother and fathers last name. Usually when you see
xxxx xxxx  xxxx-xxxxxx it's a maiden name with married last name or mother and fathers name. A lot of Europians and S. American's take on both parents names.

2. Does anyone remember the rumor or story about the blond female who was staying at the HI same time Natalee and MB kids were? She was right across the hall from Natalee's room. She and her boyfriend were buying and doing drugs or one of their friends and she was suppose to pay the drug dealer and said she would the next day but skipped out and left Aruba? She was threatened by the drug dealer if I recall. Maybe this
so-called witness saw this blond girl and mistaken her for Natalee?

3.What's the Statue of Limitations for Rape in Aruba, if any?

4. Klaas, make Jacqueline's golden slipper a Santa helper elf slipper, Robot's w/missle toe in one hand and a Santa hat and Carnut a Santa suite. hehe

5. Hubby and I rented a movie tonight and watched "The Lake House". Very good movie.

6. Daughters puppy in her santa elfs helper outfit. I think her little puppy is just the cutest little bugger. And hyper but just as sweet and playful. She's not a puppy anymore. Just a little over a year but to me still a puppy.

(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b341/dkpen/pika2.jpg)


Title: Thanks Klaas
Post by: IBE on December 03, 2006, 02:50:20 AM
Thanks Klaas

Yippee!!! am back!

Thank you !!!!!

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: dkpen on December 03, 2006, 02:52:14 AM
Hi IBE....think we are the only ones left in the monkey cage.

How are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: dkpen on December 03, 2006, 02:54:00 AM
Night and sweet dreams!

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:14:40 AM
Here's one if Hotshot wants it. I'm just experimenting, so it's perfectly alright if anybody doesn't want to use the results; don't hesitate to ignore!    :wink:  

I've got a million questions for 'ya Klaas.............I'm sure there's a better way than to "background erase" after moving one image onto another, but I don't know what it is, and as long as there's avatars I'm just trying to figure it out!

Guys, you don't know how lucky you are to have Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 03:15:26 AM
I'm in and out~ mostly out.

Today was (Saturday) day five of no ciggies!

G'nite!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:15:57 AM
And eventually, I'll even learn how to PASTE the image I'm referring to:  (http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Hotshot.jpg):roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:16:30 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
I'm in and out~ mostly out.

Today was (Saturday) day five of no ciggies!

G'nite!


Justins............do you want a little Christmas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 03:23:40 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
I'm in and out~ mostly out.

Today was (Saturday) day five of no ciggies!

G'nite!


Justins............do you want a little Christmas?


For my avatar? Sure!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:27:28 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
I'm in and out~ mostly out.

Today was (Saturday) day five of no ciggies!

G'nite!


Justins............do you want a little Christmas?


For my avatar? Sure!


K, I'll see what I can do. When I'm done, if you'd rather have something else, Klaas will help you, but I'm looking for something to work on.

I'm not fast, but I'll have something for you if you want to check in the morning. Have a great night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 03:27:35 AM
I'll be back (much later) this morning. About to fall asleep on the keyboard.
Zzzzzzzz...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:28:53 AM
Nite Justins! Sleep tight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 03, 2006, 04:22:33 AM
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/gotmebuggin.png)

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 04:43:10 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/justinsmom2006acopy.jpg)

Well, I tried to make it look Christmasy.........

It may look like Christmas threw up on this one!

Justins, it's PERFECTLY ok if you don't use this. I learned a little by doing it, so thx!!  :lol:

( I learned to PASTE the picture on the same post!  :wink: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 04:45:42 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/gotmebuggin.png)

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

 :lol:


Now I'll have nightmares or insomnia!  :lol:

NIGHTY NIGHT!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 04:57:44 AM
Hey Mrs. Red.....................

Tell Red that I made sure the Christmas package had a Mikimoto tag on it. I wrapped it, the least he can do is fill the order!   :wink:  :lol:

( You decide who stays in the cage, not Red, right? )  :shock:


Title: Avatar test
Post by: IBE on December 03, 2006, 07:59:19 AM
Christmas avatar test


Title: Opps
Post by: IBE on December 03, 2006, 08:19:17 AM
Am either too large or too small in my Christmas avatar.

Going back to bed and back to Klass' one


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 08:24:15 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Leslie - the general concensus, even at the pro-Joran sites is that it's most likely a witness statement from an Aruban.  My guess is someone paid to give a false witness statement.


I wouldn't assume that an Aruban witness would need to be paid to give a  false witness statement against Natalee.  It's clear that since day one the attitude on Aruba has been that the less sympathetic Natalee can be made to appear, and the more it can be shown she was placing herself in danger with her behavior, the better it is for Aruba.  So basically everyone on the island has a motive to lie about her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 08:33:16 AM
It is election day in Venezuela!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 08:34:24 AM
On another site someone said the date on the cocaine PV appears to be July,  I'm not seeing that myself.

Klaasend is it possible to zoom in on just the name?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 09:38:15 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Anna wrote;
Quote
So this woman perhaps dies inbetween statements and Paulus just decides she was the very one that he spoke to at the bank. Just like Joran, Paulus can make a designer lie, too.

Wouldn't the bank have a surveillance video?



Probably BB but no one ever seems to look at them except Beth.  They then record over them or something.  Darnedest thing I ever saw but none of the tapes that are there were ever confiscated.  I would think McDonalds would have one as well as several other places but we have heard nothing of any of this.

Dunno why but think just no one ever bothered to check.


About that surveillance video at the bank, I remember last summer (2005) when Arubagirl took some pictures (maybe on a Sunday) and posted them here of the bank and McDonald's area.  If memory serves, there was either not a video camera in that area, or the video recorded over after x amount of hours.  Not sure which but I Recall that from last summer.  Does anyone else remember that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 09:46:42 AM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Hi everyone!

Ugh, I'm becoming a late night poster again.  :?  Need sleep!  LOL

1. The witness on the letter must be female and married unless the male took on both mother and fathers last name. Usually when you see
xxxx xxxx  xxxx-xxxxxx it's a maiden name with married last name or mother and fathers name. A lot of Europians and S. American's take on both parents names.

2. Does anyone remember the rumor or story about the blond female who was staying at the HI same time Natalee and MB kids were? She was right across the hall from Natalee's room. She and her boyfriend were buying and doing drugs or one of their friends and she was suppose to pay the drug dealer and said she would the next day but skipped out and left Aruba? She was threatened by the drug dealer if I recall. Maybe this
so-called witness saw this blond girl and mistaken her for Natalee?

3.What's the Statue of Limitations for Rape in Aruba, if any?

4. Klaas, make Jacqueline's golden slipper a Santa helper elf slipper, Robot's w/missle toe in one hand and a Santa hat and Carnut a Santa suite. hehe

5. Hubby and I rented a movie tonight and watched "The Lake House". Very good movie.

6. Daughters puppy in her santa elfs helper outfit. I think her little puppy is just the cutest little bugger. And hyper but just as sweet and playful. She's not a puppy anymore. Just a little over a year but to me still a puppy.

(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b341/dkpen/pika2.jpg)


the name thing with multiple names is not necessarily the way it works.  Many men have multiple names but choose to use the 2-3 names.  In the case of many Hispanic men in this country, they will have hyphenated names.   Don't ask me how I know that but it is true that they will have 3, 4 or even 5 names.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 09:51:16 AM
Shizaru, I think there was a conscienciou effort by people like Julia Renfro from day #1 to make Natalee into an unsympathetic character.  I have it on pretty good word that on day #2 of her disappearance some members of the press whose name shall remain anonymous said it "served the little Bible-totin' *itch right. She got what she was asking for."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 09:52:16 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I'm guessing four long names mean probably not Dutch?

Why, not long enough? Sweatyrunningman's PV reads as...

Paulus Antonious Petrus Johanna van der Sloot


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 09:53:55 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Secret message to Leslie. Third ballot. Stepane Dion.
M and B I hope are gone. They are the dogs that have had their day.
CBC... where do the others go

That is a shocker!  Stephen Harper must be celebrating!   Dion isn't Prime Minister material; more of a behind-the-scenes guy, but better than Paul Martin anyday.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 10:00:55 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I'm guessing four long names mean probably not Dutch?

Why, not long enough? Sweatyrunningman's PV reads as...

Paulus Antonious Petrus Johanna van der Sloot


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

It probably makes him sweat to have to write his name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 10:02:38 AM
LESLIE: I was hoping to find out if Ruth Dijkhoff works at the CMB bank or if she is the Ruth that passed away....Unfortunately, my friend in Aruba does not know Ruth.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 10:04:11 AM
igsigs, I had a cousin who married into a fairly wealthy Dutch family from Texas.  The son had multiple names.  My #3 son always enjoyed playing with him when they came to visit and #3 son would say, "when is my cousin with five names coming back?"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 10:05:20 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I'm guessing four long names mean probably not Dutch?

Why, not long enough? Sweatyrunningman's PV reads as...

Paulus Antonious Petrus Johanna van der Sloot


OK, could be Dutch then.  The last name seems a bit more Latiny to me tho, looks like it ends in a vowel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 10:09:40 AM
In Aruba the woman's maiden name is last:

Ruth Gisela Dijkhoff-Holtmann


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:09:57 AM
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:13:20 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
On another site someone said the date on the cocaine PV appears to be July,  I'm not seeing that myself.

Klaasend is it possible to zoom in on just the name?

Shizaru - I did and you can't read it and I can't read any date either.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:14:33 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


 :lol:  :lol: It was so difficult watching that skit last night, OMG.  Was worth it to see mention of JVDS name though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 10:14:46 AM
Quote from: "Florida"
LESLIE: I was hoping to find out if Ruth Dijkhoff works at the CMB bank or if she is the Ruth that passed away....Unfortunately, my friend in Aruba does not know Ruth.....

PVDS is not clear, in his statement, whether Ruth worked in the bank or was doing her own banking at the time.  You have to wonder when a 50 year old woman dies if it was an illness, suicide, accident or murder.    If your friend could go to the Aruban newspapers and search their archives, she might find the original obituary.  I have searched everywhere I can think of on the internet.  Thank your friend!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:15:54 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


 :lol:  :lol: It was so difficult watching that skit last night, OMG.  Was worth it to see mention of JVDS name though.


As MRS Red said Amy Pohler does a pretty bad southern accent.  But I admit when I heard her say his name, my ears perked up, and thought about all of the Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:16:36 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Leslie - the general concensus, even at the pro-Joran sites is that it's most likely a witness statement from an Aruban.  My guess is someone paid to give a false witness statement.


I wouldn't assume that an Aruban witness would need to be paid to give a  false witness statement against Natalee.  It's clear that since day one the attitude on Aruba has been that the less sympathetic Natalee can be made to appear, and the more it can be shown she was placing herself in danger with her behavior, the better it is for Aruba.  So basically everyone on the island has a motive to lie about her.

We agree. I went and looked at some old archives and it started pretty early on. The ran away before started within the first week also. And the source of that was ppl in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 10:20:57 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
igsigs, I had a cousin who married into a fairly wealthy Dutch family from Texas.  The son had multiple names.  My #3 son always enjoyed playing with him when they came to visit and #3 son would say, "when is my cousin with five names coming back?"

 :lol:

Shiz, i would go with non-D utch also. I just wanted to write out sweatyrunningman again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 10:23:37 AM
Quote from: "Florida"
In Aruba the woman's maiden name is last:
Ruth Gisela Dijkhoff-Holtmann

But Paul refers to her as Ruth Dijkhoff.   It could be something really important or a big nothing.  It is just curious how PVDS remembers the entire banking activities of May 30th on June 23 when those memories were absent from his June 18th declaration.  As they say " One witness is no witness" so I guess "A dead witness is no witness".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:26:45 AM
At the beginning, I  made an assumption that it was Joran's Pimp buddies who were starting and posting alot of the rumors.
Right from the very beginning, I don't remember any missing person case where the missing person was trashed so much by the last people known to be seen with her.
How many blonde girls were on Aruba at that time ?
How many sightings of Not Natalees were there ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:27:47 AM
SHIZARU

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine3.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine4.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:32:23 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Secret message to Leslie. Third ballot. Stepane Dion.
M and B I hope are gone. They are the dogs that have had their day.
CBC... where do the others go

That is a shocker!  Stephen Harper must be celebrating!   Dion isn't Prime Minister material; more of a behind-the-scenes guy, but better than Paul Martin anyday.


ROFL ....at myself.  :lol:

I thought Kat_Gram was making fun of Shango with that msg., and that it didn't mean anything.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:32:36 AM
Someone over there the F site said that they could have it enlarged or whatever and have it all, because not just the name, but he rest of it, where, when, etc is intersting.
I really do not believe the cocaine thing. The drinking, yes, but not that drug. I don't remember any reports of really bad behaviour on her part either.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 10:33:32 AM
How about that word in quotation marks down at the bottom?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:37:36 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Secret message to Leslie. Third ballot. Stepane Dion.
M and B I hope are gone. They are the dogs that have had their day.
CBC... where do the others go

That is a shocker!  Stephen Harper must be celebrating!   Dion isn't Prime Minister material; more of a behind-the-scenes guy, but better than Paul Martin anyday.


ROFL ....at myself.  :lol:

I thought Kat_Gram was making fun of Shango with that msg., and that it didn't mean anything.  :lol:

Hey, I did it that way ON PURPOSE.
 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
My idea of a little joke. I want to have little coded messages too ! !
As for Mr. Dion, we'll have to see what he is made of now that he is in the Front Room. It was good that they all came out and got behind him instead of getting the knives out as they have done in the past. I sure didn't like the other two.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:39:17 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
How about that word in quotation marks down at the bottom?


It's so blurry you can't read it at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:39:57 AM
I stuck that PV in Paint, Adobe PhotoShop. It just kept getting fuzzier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:42:52 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Secret message to Leslie. Third ballot. Stepane Dion.
M and B I hope are gone. They are the dogs that have had their day.
CBC... where do the others go

That is a shocker!  Stephen Harper must be celebrating!   Dion isn't Prime Minister material; more of a behind-the-scenes guy, but better than Paul Martin anyday.


ROFL ....at myself.  :lol:

I thought Kat_Gram was making fun of Shango with that msg., and that it didn't mean anything.  :lol:

Hey, I did it that way ON PURPOSE.
 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
My idea of a little joke. I want to have little coded messages too ! !
As for Mr. Dion, we'll have to see what he is made of now that he is in the Front Room. It was good that they all came out and got behind him instead of getting the knives out as they have done in the past. I sure didn't like the other two.


 :lol:  You're pretty good after all at code-talking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 10:45:37 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "Florida"
In Aruba the woman's maiden name is last:
Ruth Gisela Dijkhoff-Holtmann

But Paul refers to her as Ruth Dijkhoff.   It could be something really important or a big nothing.  It is just curious how PVDS remembers the entire banking activities of May 30th on June 23 when those memories were absent from his June 18th declaration.  As they say " One witness is no witness" so I guess "A dead witness is no witness".


Unfortunately, there are so many DIJKHOFF'S & WERLEMAN'S in Aruba....

Rita from the bank:
June 23

To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
having made any transaction and went back to work. I left my workplace
at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30.
 I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.


   To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
 remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.

Why the rush twice to deposit Joran's winnings?

"Dijkhoff Ruthlin G" "Palisiaweg 17-c" "584-0257"

One of the managers of CMB: Roberto Dijkhoff T.L. 164

Both addresses are in the Paradera area.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:48:13 AM
Shizaru, I know you deal in facts and the concrete, but want to run something past you.

Would my theory that Guido was very involved, but his boss, Posner, covered for him and provided an alibi by saying he was working fit into the time-line better?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 10:49:29 AM
What do the initials on the left bottom line look like to you?  

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/pvcocaine4.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 10:49:44 AM
Good morning monkeys! Christmas came early this year....Looky what Klaas got me  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Thanks ever so, Klaasend!!!!!!!

BTW, what's that fuzzy document? TIA...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:51:32 AM
Quote from: "mishy"
Good morning monkeys! Christmas came early this year....Looky what Klaas got me  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Thanks ever so, Klaasend!!!!!!!

BTW, what's that fuzzy document? TIA...


'morning mishy.  :D  You're all decorated.

That's the PV stating Natalee had drugs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 10:53:31 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Shizaru, I know you deal in facts and the concrete, but want to run something past you.

Would my theory that Guido was very involved, but his boss, Posner, covered for him and provided an alibi by saying he was working fit into the time-line better?


Presumably there is videotape showing Huido at the casino until he got off work.  

So if Guido was involved at all I think it was most likely after the fact in helping Joran remove the body from the beach.  The problem with that tho is there is a 40 minute gap between Joran's phone call to Deepak and when Guido got off work, was he just waiting outside the casino all that time?  Why not go in to make sure Guido was there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:54:18 AM
My camera only does the x 10 Zoom, still fuzzy . But it was a good idea. also, a photocopier where you just keep doing the enlarge might be an idea.
Or, phone deVries and ask him to send a Fax it to Red ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:56:24 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "memphis"
Shizaru, I know you deal in facts and the concrete, but want to run something past you.

Would my theory that Guido was very involved, but his boss, Posner, covered for him and provided an alibi by saying he was working fit into the time-line better?


Presumably there is videotape showing Huido at the casino until he got off work.  

So if Guido was involved at all I think it was most likely after the fact in helping Joran remove the body from the beach.  The problem with that tho is there is a 40 minute gap between Joran's phone call to Deepak and when Guido got off work, was he just waiting outside the casino all that time?  Why not go in to make sure Guido was there?


Makes sense, but I can't help thinking Guido was involved in more. The charges (or whatever they call them) he was brought in over were pretty severe. More severe than the Kalpoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:57:00 AM
Shizaru - it kindof looks like S.E.A. XXXXXXXXX


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 10:57:46 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "mishy"
Good morning monkeys! Christmas came early this year....Looky what Klaas got me  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Thanks ever so, Klaasend!!!!!!!

BTW, what's that fuzzy document? TIA...


'morning mishy.  :D  You're all decorated.

That's the PV stating Natalee had drugs.


Thanks Memphis...You look terrific!! Personally, I don't think Natalee did any cocaine, especially enough to OD on! If she did any at all, it was very little, and only after she'd been drinking AND had her drink doctored, IMHO...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:59:56 AM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "mishy"
Good morning monkeys! Christmas came early this year....Looky what Klaas got me  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Thanks ever so, Klaasend!!!!!!!

BTW, what's that fuzzy document? TIA...


'morning mishy.  :D  You're all decorated.

That's the PV stating Natalee had drugs.


Thanks Memphis...You look terrific!! Personally, I don't think Natalee did any cocaine, especially enough to OD on! If she did any at all, it was very little, and only after she'd been drinking AND had her drink doctored, IMHO...


Me neither, and that is the general consensus. They're looking at the name b/c pretty sure it is hispanic or Dutch, and not American.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 11:00:04 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "memphis"
Shizaru, I know you deal in facts and the concrete, but want to run something past you.

Would my theory that Guido was very involved, but his boss, Posner, covered for him and provided an alibi by saying he was working fit into the time-line better?


Presumably there is videotape showing Huido at the casino until he got off work.  

So if Guido was involved at all I think it was most likely after the fact in helping Joran remove the body from the beach.  The problem with that tho is there is a 40 minute gap between Joran's phone call to Deepak and when Guido got off work, was he just waiting outside the casino all that time?  Why not go in to make sure Guido was there?


I wonder if Guido had a dinner break that night, and if so, what time? And if so, what did he do during that break!?!?!?!?!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 11:01:47 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - it kindof looks like S.E.A. XXXXXXXXX


That's what I thought too, except the the A could also be a P or R


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:02:39 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Shizaru - it kindof looks like S.E.A. XXXXXXXXX


That's what I thought too, except the the A could also be a P or R

Yep - we are just guessing.  Need the original!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 11:03:36 AM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "memphis"
Shizaru, I know you deal in facts and the concrete, but want to run something past you.

Would my theory that Guido was very involved, but his boss, Posner, covered for him and provided an alibi by saying he was working fit into the time-line better?


Presumably there is videotape showing Huido at the casino until he got off work.  

So if Guido was involved at all I think it was most likely after the fact in helping Joran remove the body from the beach.  The problem with that tho is there is a 40 minute gap between Joran's phone call to Deepak and when Guido got off work, was he just waiting outside the casino all that time?  Why not go in to make sure Guido was there?


I wonder if Guido had a dinner break that night, and if so, what time? And if so, what did he do during that break!?!?!?!?!


I'm still stuck on Posner providing an alibi. He can choose to do whatever he wants with those casino videos. The rumor is, he called Guido into his office and Guido supposedly wet his pants he was so scared. I don't know where that rumor originated, though. Anyway, Guido sells his new car and heads to NL before school is out. He also had a very expensive lawyer representing him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:04:47 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


Thanks, Jacqeline.  I'm not sure which skit, though.  Have watched a few, but keep being sent to a page where I have to select from the right.  Help! :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 11:05:15 AM
Rammstein
Hero Member

Posts: 1559



    Re: THE FACTOR WITH BILL O'REILLY - 12/01/2006
« Reply #53 on: December 02, 2006, 10:18:35 PM »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions from Kat, my answers are in red

How often are they granted this status ? Seldom
Do you see it as being a feasible method in this case ? Highly unlikely, wouldn't know who would be a right candidate for it
I was thinking that the Kalpoes could be presented with this opportunity. I think as the case stands now that they are not possible candidates for becoming crown-witnessesLet's face it, there is a lack of blood evidence or any other evidence in this case and the system in Aruba can't pick one of JVDS statements of the many conflicting stories he has told and decide, well, we'll go with this one because the rest of them are all lies. any statement has to be backed up by evidence, that is indeed the problem
At some point they have to go with what they have and if making an offer of lesser charges against the Kalpoes is a solution, is it possible ? they will only go to trial if they have enough for a conviction. They will not make offers, our system does not allow that
They do this in Canada. Sometines it backfires and they find that they have made a deal with the devil
in order to get a conviction. making deals is almost impossible to backfire due to the immense restrictive nature of the law on crown-witnesses
I went to BFN and aske Ramm some Q's on Dutch Law.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:05:38 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


Thanks, Jacqeline.  I'm not sure which skit, though.  Have watched a few, but keep being sent to a page where I have to select from the right.  Help! :(


It was a Nancy Grace skit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:05:40 AM
Oh look page 49 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 11:08:11 AM
Good morning friends....I have joined the human race again (was ill)...but did not miss a post here....read for hours...lol    :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 11:09:41 AM
LESLIE:  
It has been suggested thar ARUBAGIRL
is a relative of van der STRAATEN's....

Also, that she is SIMIAN
The reason why Simian had certain info

In the Paradera area is:
ArubaGirl
van der Straaten
Obuder's Rancho Daimari
Freddy? at the Church
Helicopter owned by a D. Dijkhoff
Gold Mine Ranch
etc.................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 11:10:06 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "memphis"
Shizaru, I know you deal in facts and the concrete, but want to run something past you.

Would my theory that Guido was very involved, but his boss, Posner, covered for him and provided an alibi by saying he was working fit into the time-line better?


Presumably there is videotape showing Huido at the casino until he got off work.  

So if Guido was involved at all I think it was most likely after the fact in helping Joran remove the body from the beach.  The problem with that tho is there is a 40 minute gap between Joran's phone call to Deepak and when Guido got off work, was he just waiting outside the casino all that time?  Why not go in to make sure Guido was there?


I wonder if Guido had a dinner break that night, and if so, what time? And if so, what did he do during that break!?!?!?!?!


I'm still stuck on Posner providing an alibi. He can choose to do whatever he wants with those casino videos. The rumor is, he called Guido into his office and Guido supposedly wet his pants he was so scared. I don't know where that rumor originated, though. Anyway, Guido sells his new car and heads to NL before school is out. He also had a very expensive lawyer representing him.


Oh yeah, I'm sure Posner has a stake in this. Remember when Beth got some sort of threatening phone call from him?

What is it with these little boys on Aruba? Sleeping with parents, wetting their pants? If you don't wanna do the time, don't do the crime! They would never last in prison!!!!!! :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :evil:  :x  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:14:04 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good morning friends....I have joined the human race again (was ill)...but did not miss a post here....read for hours...lol    :D


Glad you are feeling better!!!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 11:14:56 AM
Mishy ~ yes, but I suspect they also only want neckties that they can remove.

MeMere ~ morning sweetie. Did you have that upper respiratory thingie that hangs on forever?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 11:18:49 AM
Does anyone remember if there was one person who represented Aruba from the PG office or the ALE who seemed competent ?
The first splash that KJ made was when she said, well, we can't go in there like cowboys . Thta was a strange comment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:19:34 AM
Thanks, Klaas, but I am only able to pull up a Foley skit for NG.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:20:25 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Thanks, Klaas, but I am only able to pull up a Foley skit for NG.


I'll check the link after the thread change.  Maybe that skit isn't there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:20:50 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


Thanks, Jacqeline.  I'm not sure which skit, though.  Have watched a few, but keep being sent to a page where I have to select from the right.  Help! :(


It was a Nancy Grace skit

I'm having a problem accessing the video.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:21:46 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Thanks, Klaas, but I am only able to pull up a Foley skit for NG.


I'll check the link after the thread change.  Maybe that skit isn't there?


Yes, seems Season 32 is only updated through week of 11/18/06.  Thanks, though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 11:22:05 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Mishy ~ yes, but I suspect they also only want neckties that they can remove.

MeMere ~ morning sweetie. Did you have that upper respiratory thingie that hangs on forever?


Don't want to get too graphic...it was a stomach thing...maybe food poisoning, maybe viral.... :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:22:15 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Good morning,

For any of you asking about the JVDS reference on SNL, here it is...

Note, it comes at the end of the skit...

http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/videos/


Thanks, Jacqeline.  I'm not sure which skit, though.  Have watched a few, but keep being sent to a page where I have to select from the right.  Help! :(


It was a Nancy Grace skit

I'm having a problem accessing the video.


I'll check it after the thread change.  The skit was hard to watch as Nancy Grace can be at times, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 11:22:53 AM
I am just trying to figure out where this thing can go from here.
For sure any analysis of how the case was handled is going to find them all lacking in professionalism and competency in their jobs.
Even if DeVries puts some pressure on the Dutch and the Arubans, what is left of the case for prosecution purposes ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #552 12/1 - 12/3/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:23:16 AM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 553

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=607