Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 08:33:19 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 08:33:19 PM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/candleman2justice2007.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazymom on April 09, 2007, 10:29:07 PM
Here!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:29:11 PM
:oops:   Klaas Im glad you and lalas posted too..lol
I didnt pay attention while I was typin and hitting submit.
 I had a hard time at times undersstanding Jossy.   :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 10:29:36 PM
Angie - you did a great job.  I am always a couple of sentences behind with Jossy as I have trouble understanding him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 09, 2007, 10:30:22 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:oops:   Klaas Im glad you and lalas posted too..lol
I didnt pay attention while I was typin and hitting submit.
 I had a hard time at times undersstanding Jossy.   :oops:

Thanks Angie, Klaas and Lala's for transcribing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 09, 2007, 10:31:29 PM
Thanks for transcribing, Angie. You did great! Jossy does have a strong accent and can be hard to understand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:31:40 PM
Not sure if they will post tonight, but Red just activated 2 new members to the forum:

adoronron (this person has been looking closely at the photos and emailing me examples)

and

Tiger


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:32:00 PM
I am here...now Klaas...please bring all those pics over here so we have them close by when Carpe gets here.  Especially the one with the face in the reflection.  
 
Surely there is someone out there that knows what Ed Smith looks like.


Chavez+MEP=  the reason the United States is involved.  They know about the wiretaps...they did them.  You can bet the farm!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on April 09, 2007, 10:32:17 PM
Thanks all!  I know how hard Jossy is to understand.

I wanna do something to help him, just for doing the right thing!

Them getting closer to Chavez?  They think tourism is bad now????  Geesh, what are they thinking?

Ok, silly question.  What have they been thinking for the last 2 years.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:33:34 PM
Thanks folks.. lol

Hope Dana feels better too !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on April 09, 2007, 10:33:34 PM
O/T, But I did see Mr. Red.
Does the owner of a blog that is open for public comments have any
resposibility for comments made by their posters ?
I am speaking of anti Semetic comments that I find intolerable made by posters.
And the web Site is not some guy in the basement, but a well known
entertainment blog.
I just complained , but I got one of those robotic repsonses.
Who can I report this to ?
American, out of CA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 09, 2007, 10:33:35 PM
Goodnight everyone.  Having computer problems tonight and don't feel like fussing with it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 09, 2007, 10:33:55 PM
Thank you Dana and Jossy.

klaas - thank you too for emailing Dana. He asked all of my questions, I think? and Jossy answered?

Still want somebody to go AFTER Dompig and Amigoe.com for that planted article about Max DeVries being an insurance scam.

I will see what I can find about a Miami Press Assn. and post it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:34:06 PM
Quote from: "San"
Goodnight everyone.  Having computer problems tonight and don't feel like fussing with it.


 Night San! Hope you get it fixed up..  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:34:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Goodnight everyone.  Having computer problems tonight and don't feel like fussing with it.


Nite San


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 09, 2007, 10:35:00 PM
Quote from: "San"
Goodnight everyone.  Having computer problems tonight and don't feel like fussing with it.


Night, San. Sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:35:34 PM
Great show Dana!  Thanks for getting Jossy on.  I know he's busy, but I always enjoy hearing what he has to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:40:34 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thank you Dana and Jossy.

klaas - thank you too for emailing Dana. He asked all of my questions, I think? and Jossy answered?

Still want somebody to go AFTER Dompig and Amigoe.com for that planted article about Max DeVries being an insurance scam.

I will see what I can find about a Miami Press Assn. and post it.


  Its disgusting that there are no records of Maz Devries case?  WTH?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:40:53 PM
Klaas
Need a favor.  Please post that pic of the hand and wrist for me here...not the link but the actual pic....I can hear you sighing all the way to California...please, please, pretty please with sugar on top???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 10:42:11 PM
Enjoyed Dana's show, as always.  
Jossy had some very interesting things to say about their government.  If they do align with Chavez I can see all these wannabe dictators in Aruba with their heads on poles once it becomes a fact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: LilPuma on April 09, 2007, 10:42:44 PM
Only heard that last 15 minutes of the show, will have to go to the podcast later.  But I liked what I heard and LOVED the music tonight.  I'm always bopping to Dana's tunes, but tonight he outdid himself by slowin' it down with Righteous Bros. and True Love Ways.  

If we write to the Miami association for Jossy, what are we supposed to say?  Don't let Dictator Oduber silence him?  What's wrong with those Arubans, why aren't they protesting?  Are they putting something in the water as well as the drinks now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:43:13 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thank you Dana and Jossy.

klaas - thank you too for emailing Dana. He asked all of my questions, I think? and Jossy answered?

Still want somebody to go AFTER Dompig and Amigoe.com for that planted article about Max DeVries being an insurance scam.

I will see what I can find about a Miami Press Assn. and post it.


  Its disgusting that there are no records of Maz Devries case?  WTH?



We always knew there was a big abyss where they toss those records...wonder what else is in that big hole?  No records...no records...now we know what the out come of Natalee's case will be if they get their way. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:43:32 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
Need a favor.  Please post that pic of the hand and wrist for me here...not the link but the actual pic....I can hear you sighing all the way to California...please, please, pretty please with sugar on top???

Do you have the link handy so I don't have to go find it?  I didn't save the pic on my pc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:44:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
Need a favor.  Please post that pic of the hand and wrist for me here...not the link but the actual pic....I can hear you sighing all the way to California...please, please, pretty please with sugar on top???

Do you have the link handy so I don't have to go find it?  I didn't save the pic on my pc


Now, I am the one doing the sighing...brb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 10:45:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Not sure if they will post tonight, but Red just activated 2 new members to the forum:

adoronron (this person has been looking closely at the photos and emailing me examples)

and

Tiger


Is Tiger our Cat in disguise?  He has been calling himself Tiger today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:45:57 PM
Quote from: Lala'sMom
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Thank you Dana and Jossy.

klaas - thank you too for emailing Dana. He asked all of my questions, I think? and Jossy answered?

Still want somebody to go AFTER Dompig and Amigoe.com for that planted article about Max DeVries being an insurance scam.

I will see what I can find about a Miami Press Assn. and post it.


  Its disgusting that there are no records of Maz Devries case?  WTH?



We always knew there was a big abyss where they toss those records...wonder what else is in that big hole?  No records...no records...now we know what the out come of Natalee's case will be if they get their way. :roll:[/quote

Exactly Lalas  :(    What a bunch of BS   <I was nice and didnt say bullshit so you didn't have to wear your muffs   :wink: >  

Totally disgusting to hear this garbage.. Jossy has a set of gonads the size of Texas!  Give him liots of credit for speaking his mind and not giving in!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:47:28 PM
Tibro - no, Tiger is new


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 09, 2007, 10:47:33 PM
Inter American Press Association:

Jules Dubois Building
1801 S.W. 3rd Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
Tel: (305) 634-2465
Fax: (305) 635-2272

http://www.sipiapa.org/default.cfm

(Contact Us gives you an email form.)

Here is my email to them:

Quote
Jossy Mansur's Aruba newspaper, Diario, is subject of a boycott imposed by the Prime Minister of Aruba and the MEP party.

Diario has been reporting numerous scandals involving various government ministers. Also, he is the only person of imporance on Aruba who has called for a proper investigation of the Natalee Holloway case.

For more information, go here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=188&start=400

(Scroll down to the 3rd and 4th post.)

Since when does a so-called democratically-elected government supress the press? PLEASE PUBLICIZE this - or whatever your association can do.

Thank you.


The SM link is to page 21 of the M&C thread; the two posts are Amigoe's article about the boycott, and Jossy's response on another web site.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:48:50 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GFHFHF-1.png)

I guess I could do this, couldn't I?  Do I need to upload to my photobucket account?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: LilPuma on April 09, 2007, 10:50:17 PM
I wonder if Mrs. Red heard Jaque Hollander.  This is an important issue and the Duke fiasco has set us (women) back a few steps.  I do think Mrs. Red gave us a 'listen up' on this guest and topic awhile back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:51:07 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
I wonder if Mrs. Red heard Jaque Hollander.  This is an important issue and the Duke fiasco has set us (women) back a few steps.  I do think Mrs. Red gave us a 'listen up' on this guest and topic awhile back.

She probably did but if not, she can listen to the podcast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:51:58 PM
Angie! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 10:52:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tibro - no, Tiger is new


Thanks Klaas.  Now we have two Tigers  :wink:  :wink:

Where is my book.  Lala's blew the margins.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:52:51 PM
OMG!  Fix me!!! I didn't mean to do that, I swear!!  I am so sorry.  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:53:14 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tibro - no, Tiger is new


Thanks Klaas.  Now we have two Tigers  :wink:  :wink:

Where is my book.  Lala's blew the margins.......

Lala's didn't, that was me, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 10:53:43 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tibro - no, Tiger is new


Thanks Klaas.  Now we have two Tigers  :wink:  :wink:

Where is my book.  Lala's blew the margins.......


Dayum!!!  Klaas fixed it  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:54:09 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie! :lol:  :lol:



 :wink:


  Lalas.. you did fine!!   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dana on April 09, 2007, 10:54:21 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie! :lol:  :lol:


Hope everyone enjoyed the show tonight, sorry if I sounded like trash tonight, but this flu is really kicking the crap out of me.

:-(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:54:28 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
OMG!  Fix me!!! I didn't mean to do that, I swear!!  I am so sorry.  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

You didn't do it Lala's, I did when I added the IMG tags to the link you pasted.  I've since copied it and made it a bit smaller and replaced your link.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 10:55:21 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie! :lol:  :lol:


Hope everyone enjoyed the show tonight, sorry if I sounded like trash tonight, but this flu is really kicking the crap out of me.

:-(


GREAT SHOW DANA!  I thought you sounded better than you did last week, so you must be getting a little better.  Hope you get all better soon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:55:22 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tibro - no, Tiger is new


Thanks Klaas.  Now we have two Tigers  :wink:  :wink:

Where is my book.  Lala's blew the margins.......


Oh shutup!  I am terrible at computer thingys.  Just awful.  I can't believe I just did that.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:56:15 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie! :lol:  :lol:


Hope everyone enjoyed the show tonight, sorry if I sounded like trash tonight, but this flu is really kicking the crap out of me.

:-(


  Dana,
  Enjoyed your show and I am so sorry you are still ill  :(
GET WELL SOON!!!    You sounded just fine!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 10:58:03 PM
The why does mine still take up the entire page?  I need it to be smaller, that is the only way to see the hand and the wrist band.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 10:59:00 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie! :lol:  :lol:


Hope everyone enjoyed the show tonight, sorry if I sounded like trash tonight, but this flu is really kicking the crap out of me.

:-(


Dana - you need some of Cat's medicine : Jamiesons or Bushmills.  Guaranteed to cure anything.

You came through loud and clear over here.  Great choice of guests.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 10:59:59 PM
A suggestion to Dana to kick that FLU BUG,,
It dont taste the best, but it does work if you can stand to drink it down.

Cup of hot tea, dump a shot of whiskey in it and a teaspoon to tablespon of honey.  Drink it straight down. Go to bed and cover up to your head. And you will sweat out the nasty bug.  <it works..>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 11:00:13 PM
Dana
Have you seen a doctor?  You have been sick for a while now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 11:01:01 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The why does mine still take up the entire page?  I need it to be smaller, that is the only way to see the hand and the wrist band.


Check it now, just made it smaller


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 11:01:48 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GFHFHF-1.png)

I guess I could do this, couldn't I?  Do I need to upload to my photobucket account?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dana on April 09, 2007, 11:01:58 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Dana
Have you seen a doctor?  You have been sick for a while now.



yes today he prescribed me avelox ? i hate taking antibiotics but i need something for sure


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on April 09, 2007, 11:02:25 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
O/T, But I did see Mr. Red.
Does the owner of a blog that is open for public comments have any
resposibility for comments made by their posters ?
I am speaking of anti Semetic comments that I find intolerable made by posters.
And the web Site is not some guy in the basement, but a well known
entertainment blog.
I just complained , but I got one of those robotic repsonses.
Who can I report this to ?
American, out of CA.

The blog name is TMZ. COM. The post is number 151 on the Spelling gives Larry advice. There were some comments yesterday because of Stern and they seem to just let it be a free for all with these types of comments.
??? their advertisers might pay attention to me.
But, tomorrow. I am more beat than I was B4. I am just very surprised that this goes on in this day and age.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 09, 2007, 11:03:58 PM
Re-posting, my hair is on fire about this ...

From what Jossy seemed to be saying on Dana's program Monday night (04/09/2007), a way to help Jossy with the MEP government-imposed boycott against Diario, is to contact:

Inter American Press Association:

Jules Dubois Building
1801 S.W. 3rd Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
Tel: (305) 634-2465
Fax: (305) 635-2272

http://www.sipiapa.org/default.cfm

(Contact Us gives you an email form.)

Here is my email to them:

<Quote:>

Jossy Mansur's Aruba newspaper, Diario, is subject of a boycott imposed by the Prime Minister of Aruba and the MEP party.

Diario has been reporting numerous scandals involving various government ministers. Also, he is the only person of imporance on Aruba who has called for a proper investigation of the Natalee Holloway case.

For more information, go here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=188&start=400

(Scroll down to the 3rd and 4th post.)

Since when does a so-called democratically-elected government supress the press? PLEASE PUBLICIZE this - or whatever your association can do.

Thank you.

<end quote>


The SM link is to Page 21 of the M&C thread; the two posts are Amigoe's article about the boycott, and Jossy's response from another web site.

klaas - I've posted this in 3 places on the FP - Dana's show for tonight, the Aruba Travel article, and the Boycott Diario article. Is there anything else I can do?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 11:05:04 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
A suggestion to Dana to kick that FLU BUG,,
It dont taste the best, but it does work if you can stand to drink it down.

Cup of hot tea, dump a shot of whiskey in it and a teaspoon to tablespon of honey.  Drink it straight down. Go to bed and cover up to your head. And you will sweat out the nasty bug.  <it works..>


I am beginning to read your posts in Angie Speak too...I thought that said a "SNOT" of whiskey. LOL I read it twice and still didn't get it right.  I was about to ask what a snot was. LOL :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: LilPuma on April 09, 2007, 11:06:21 PM
::scratching head thinking of cures::  
I recommend tea with honey and lemon, vitamin C and bed rest.  And Chicken soup!  Ya know, grandma's remedies.  The chicken soup, although I'm vegetarian, is actually supposed to have anti-viral qualities or something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 11:06:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
The why does mine still take up the entire page?  I need it to be smaller, that is the only way to see the hand and the wrist band.


Check it now, just made it smaller


Nope there yet.  Needs to be a bit smaller. As if you were posting it in the space below here and not the whole screen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 09, 2007, 11:06:54 PM
Dana - I posted on the previous page; thanks for asking Jossy those questions.

What Aruba did to Max DeVries' mother was so horrible, it erased any doubt as to what Aruba was doing to do Holloway case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dana on April 09, 2007, 11:08:04 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Dana - I posted on the previous page; thanks for asking Jossy those questions.

What Aruba did to Max DeVries' mother was so horrible, it erased any doubt as to what Aruba was doing to do Holloway case.


you are welcome and thanks for all of your feeeling better suggestions


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:08:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
A suggestion to Dana to kick that FLU BUG,,
It dont taste the best, but it does work if you can stand to drink it down.

Cup of hot tea, dump a shot of whiskey in it and a teaspoon to tablespon of honey.  Drink it straight down. Go to bed and cover up to your head. And you will sweat out the nasty bug.  <it works..>


I am beginning to read your posts in Angie Speak too...I thought that said a "SNOT" of whiskey. LOL I read it twice and still didn't get it right.  I was about to ask what a snot was. LOL :lol:



 LOL lalas..  I actually didnt mess that one up  :wink:
Lalas,. here is one of the links to Carpes photo bucket..
I asked him permisson before if I could post or email it..

There is ALOT here.. 942 pics..  :shock:

http://s98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/?start=all


I have to look cause I may have another? I dont know if its the same.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 11:10:26 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Re-posting, my hair is on fire about this ...

From what Jossy seemed to be saying on Dana's program Monday night (04/09/2007), a way to help Jossy with the MEP government-imposed boycott against Diario, is to contact:

Inter American Press Association:

Jules Dubois Building
1801 S.W. 3rd Avenue
Miami, Florida 33129
Tel: (305) 634-2465
Fax: (305) 635-2272

http://www.sipiapa.org/default.cfm

(Contact Us gives you an email form.)

Here is my email to them:

<Quote:>

Jossy Mansur's Aruba newspaper, Diario, is subject of a boycott imposed by the Prime Minister of Aruba and the MEP party.

Diario has been reporting numerous scandals involving various government ministers. Also, he is the only person of imporance on Aruba who has called for a proper investigation of the Natalee Holloway case.

For more information, go here:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=188&start=400

(Scroll down to the 3rd and 4th post.)

Since when does a so-called democratically-elected government supress the press? PLEASE PUBLICIZE this - or whatever your association can do.

Thank you.

<end quote>


The SM link is to Page 21 of the M&C thread; the two posts are Amigoe's article about the boycott, and Jossy's response from another web site.

klaas - I've posted this in 3 places on the FP - Dana's show for tonight, the Aruba Travel article, and the Boycott Diario article. Is there anything else I can do?

We can put it in a thread too, that way we can occasionally point it out again to people.  I'll put it in a thread and correct "importance",  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: LilPuma on April 09, 2007, 11:13:37 PM
CHAVEZ IS HERE!  CHAVEZ IS HERE!  Well, there's a 1% from South America.  I figure Hugo's ears was burnin'.  Tibro, do you have two computers logged onto SM?  There's a 2% Australia on the site meter.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 11:18:24 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
CHAVEZ IS HERE!  CHAVEZ IS HERE!  Well, there's a 1% from South America.  I figure Hugo's ears was burnin'.  Tibro, do you have two computers logged onto SM?  There's a 2% Australia on the site meter.   :lol:


You mean I am not alone??   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 11:20:24 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/HandPicsmall.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: LilPuma on April 09, 2007, 11:20:47 PM
Perhaps you're being monitored?  Have you Aussies ever heard of the Patriot Act?   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:22:24 PM
lalas

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=ghtytryddd.png


More photos there..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 11:24:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GFHFHF-1.png)

I guess I could do this, couldn't I?  Do I need to upload to my photobucket account?


Can you guys see the arm now?  Oh please, someone see the arm.. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 11:25:12 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Perhaps you're being monitored?  Have you Aussies ever heard of the Patriot Act?   :lol:


I will send an email to John Howard about it all.  :lol:  :lol:

Seriously, there was another Aussie reading here - ISP was Optus I think out of Sydney.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 09, 2007, 11:26:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GFHFHF-1.png)

I guess I could do this, couldn't I?  Do I need to upload to my photobucket account?


Can you guys see the arm now?  Oh please, someone see the arm.. :roll:


Lala's I have seen the arm since Carpe first posted it.   :cry:  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 11:26:38 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
lalas

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=ghtytryddd.png


More photos there..


the wrist and hand pics are in this link.  Just scroll through them and you will be amazed at how it jumps out at you at the size it is in there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:29:03 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GFHFHF-1.png)

I guess I could do this, couldn't I?  Do I need to upload to my photobucket account?


Can you guys see the arm now?  Oh please, someone see the arm.. :roll:


  Yes I can see it.. saw it days ago.. and other images as well  :(
 Been looking at those photos in his photobucket for a long time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:30:46 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
lalas

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=ghtytryddd.png


More photos there..


the wrist and hand pics are in this link.  Just scroll through them and you will be amazed at how it jumps out at you at the size it is in there.


 I agree Lalas.. I can see  better in the smaller photos .  Esp since I got my new puter.. on my old one.. it was hard. The resolution to this new one is alot better!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 09, 2007, 11:31:04 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
lalas

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=ghtytryddd.png


More photos there..


the wrist and hand pics are in this link.  Just scroll through them and you will be amazed at how it jumps out at you at the size it is in there.


LaLa's:  It's easier for people to see if they turn up the brightness on
their monitors.  I really didn't see the arm until I did that.

DId you ever find out how big the bag was or when the pictures were
taken?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 09, 2007, 11:34:20 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
lalas

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=ghtytryddd.png


More photos there..


the wrist and hand pics are in this link.  Just scroll through them and you will be amazed at how it jumps out at you at the size it is in there.


LaLa's:  It's easier for people to see if they turn up the brightness on
their monitors.  I really didn't see the arm until I did that.

DId you ever find out how big the bag was or when the pictures were
taken?

No way to know exactly when the video was taken other than it was before it was uploaded to the aru-bay site.  I don't remember the exact date on this video..might have been around June 15?  Not sure.  That is when it was uploaded so it could have been video'd any time before that.

The size of the drain area the bag was in was about 4ft square and probably at least that deep (I think)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 09, 2007, 11:34:45 PM
Angie & Lalas - Thanks for transcribing tonight. I put some of your posts in the M&C thread (page 21). Some of those questions cleared up some "mysteries" we have posted there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 09, 2007, 11:37:19 PM
None - If you're around - you have "mail" and SO DO I !!!!! YES !!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:37:41 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Angie & Lalas - Thanks for transcribing tonight. I put some of your posts in the M&C thread (page 21). Some of those questions cleared up some "mysteries" we have posted there.


  YW MsMarple.. I am glad Klaas and Lalas were typing as well. I know I missed alot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 09, 2007, 11:51:20 PM
I'm trying to put all this together in my mind.

Correct me if I'm wrong:

A few days ago, Carpe said that he was reviewing the video taken at the
rock area and there was a portion of the video that consisted of a van
that had the back window knocked out.  There were men in some kind
of suits, like anti-viral suits (?), that were removing the bodies from the
rock area... is that right?

Ohhhh.... it's funny that you were talking about Max de Vries, because
last night I was doing some research.  There is very little information
available on the internet, but from the stuff that I read it sounded like
he and a man that his mom had met at the hotel that they were staying
at had gone out on jet skis.  According to this man, Max's jet ski had
stalled so he turned aroung to go to where he was and his jet ski stalled
also.  So the two of them waited in the water for resuers.  Max got tired
and was taken away by the current.  In another account, the story was
the same, except they had started swimming to shore and Max got
taken away with the current.  The part of the story that I find hard to
believe is that the man's jet ski, supposedly, stalled at the same spot.
What would cause that?  I've never heard of such a thing.  But with all
the human trafficking that goes on there, and with the siting of Max in
South America (if that is true) the whole disappearance of Max could
have been a hoax... a true kidnapping.

Also I read up on the disappearance of William "Bud" Larson.  According
to what I read, he didn't die while wind surfing.  I read that he had gone
to the rental shop to pick up his board that he had reserved, to find that
it had been rented to someone else.  He had an arguement with the
people in the wind-surfing shop and left... he was never seen again.  I
read that Aruban authorities put his family through the same wild goose
chase as they had put Natalee's family through.

Anyway...  I just thought that it was amazing that you were talking about
Max de Vries today, when I was thinking about him, just lastnight.

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 09, 2007, 11:51:23 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Angie & Lalas - Thanks for transcribing tonight. I put some of your posts in the M&C thread (page 21). Some of those questions cleared up some "mysteries" we have posted there.


Wow! I made the murder and crime thread.  I am honored.  That is such an important thread too.  I have read so much over there that just made my jaw drop.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:51:58 PM
I changed clothes.. feel kind of nekky now with no bonnet and bunny..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 09, 2007, 11:53:02 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Angie & Lalas - Thanks for transcribing tonight. I put some of your posts in the M&C thread (page 21). Some of those questions cleared up some "mysteries" we have posted there.


Wow! I made the murder and crime thread.  I am honored.  That is such an important thread too.  I have read so much over there that just made my jaw drop.


   LOL I read it too.. and even my typos are there  :shock:    :wink:  :wink:
  Thanks Ms  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:02:43 AM
Patti
Carpe hasn't gotten back to me on the dimensions of the basin, but I suspect Klaas is right when she says about 4 ft. square and at least that deep.  

I will add this for those that are interested.  In the previous thread this afternoon, Chicago 510 posted something that I decided to test.  He/She said that when first viewing the videos the idea of them being a type of retracing the steps on the fateful night occured to him/her.  I then went back and watched the videos without stopping.  I just sat there and watched them without any interruption and I discovered that could very well be true.  While I sat there watching things that last year made no sense to me made perfect sense.  

There is the part where the silver sedan is following the red police truck into the quarry ( I think I have that right) and there is a spot there where the driver turns to face the camera.  Eleye and I looked for that pic forever.  I also saw it on Carpe's photobucket that Angie gave the me link to.  I was determined to find it, because I had seen it before and knew it was there.    Everyone that is interested should find the time to just sit and watch the video.  It is much clearer to me that this is not just a vacation video, it was made to send a message.  I think I have realized today just how much corruption in involved and just how much is being covered up. Jossy just iced the cake for me tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:10:57 AM
Did we move that enhanced reflection from the car over here yet?  How do I do that?  I can always blow the margins again if necessary.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:15:26 AM
http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=l.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 12:16:05 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Patti
Carpe hasn't gotten back to me on the dimensions of the basin, but I suspect Klaas is right when she says about 4 ft. square and at least that deep.  

I will add this for those that are interested.  In the previous thread this afternoon, Chicago 510 posted something that I decided to test.  He/She said that when first viewing the videos the idea of them being a type of retracing the steps on the fateful night occured to him/her.  I then went back and watched the videos without stopping.  I just sat there and watched them without any interruption and I discovered that could very well be true.  While I sat there watching things that last year made no sense to me made perfect sense.  

There is the part where the silver sedan is following the red police truck into the quarry ( I think I have that right) and there is a spot there where the driver turns to face the camera.  Eleye and I looked for that pic forever.  I also saw it on Carpe's photobucket that Angie gave the me link to.  I was determined to find it, because I had seen it before and knew it was there.    Everyone that is interested should find the time to just sit and watch the video.  It is much clearer to me that this is not just a vacation video, it was made to send a message.  I think I have realized today just how much corruption in involved and just how much is being covered up. Jossy just iced the cake for me tonight.


LaLa's:

I agree with you 100%.  I have been sitting here most the day, looking through videos and pictures of the rock scene myself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:18:16 AM
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/frer4353.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:19:54 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did we move that enhanced reflection from the car over here yet?  How do I do that?  I can always blow the margins again if necessary.   :lol:


From Yapperz:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/imageseen.png)

Or this one:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/videoframewindshieldenhanced2.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:20:44 AM
Bringing over one of Carpes posts on the last thread..

NEW UNSEEN FRAMES OF THE ARUBAY VIDEO

FOCUS: INSIDE OF THE VEHICLE

WITH THE CAMERA PERSON

 

manual

slideshow here:

http://tinyurl.com/3anp9e

* After you click, use BACK and NEXT CONTROLS to the right.

_________________


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:22:42 AM
Posted as well by Carpe in the last thread..
FULL MARRIOTT BASIN CATALOG IN
THUMBNAIL VIEW


http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:23:46 AM
:shock:   Klaas? Are those a reflection in the vehicle?
 That FACE thing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 12:25:44 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=l.png


Angie - the one I see the face reflection most clearly is the next one after this

screen shot ending in : k.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:26:49 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:   Klaas? Are those a reflection in the vehicle?
 That FACE thing?

Yes, reflections in the car windshield


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:28:21 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=l.png


Angie - the one I see the face reflection most clearly is the next one after this

screen shot ending in : k.png


   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 12:28:23 AM
Patti the newspaper article that Klaas re-posted on about page 45 of previous thread says the cement basin is 4 foot by 4 foot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:29:33 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:   Klaas? Are those a reflection in the vehicle?
 That FACE thing?

Yes, reflections in the car windshield


I saw it earlier.. but I really didn't pay much attention to it?
 I honestly thought it was a .. well... to me it looked like a rock with a face in it?  :oops:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:33:03 AM
I'll have to go over the videos myself later tonight and see what reflections I can find.  I haven't had a chance to today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 12:34:42 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Patti the newspaper article that Klaas re-posted on about page 45 of previous thread says the cement basin is 4 foot by 4 foot.


I know, Sweetie.  I guess that would mean that the bag was about what
3 1/2 feet by 2 1/2 feet?

I'm just wondering about stuff.... staring at my computer wondering
if the bodies and heads that were found at the rocks were bagged
up and left in the water basin?????  If so.... why?  What is the purpose
of the basin?  Where does the water flow FROM?  It kinda looks like the
bag got stuck there because it was too big to fit through the grate?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:43:06 AM
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:49:06 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:



LOL YW Lalas.. and I betcha Tibro has those invisible pens  :wink:
 Hugin Nemo before I forget.. I don't want written up in yours or Tibros book!   :wink:
  (http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/nemo.gif)


And sumpin I tryed to make myself LONG ago.. that turn out like crap.. but I'll post it anyhow.. LOL  

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/ArubaSux.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 12:49:18 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:


Haven't you seen the missing fence palings yet ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:51:07 AM
One thing that did occur to me was in the  video the person with the camera gets out of the car and walks around.  I think this is where you see the feet of the camera person.  I noticed that after a few seconds they walk over to the basin with the bag.  How did they know that bag was there?  Maybe they didn't.  If that is the case then how is it possible that there is an image of a hand in the bag?  Some days I have more questions than answers.  As I watched, I could see the trip to the lighthouse and realized that the shark story is even more ridiculous than I first thought.  There is a clear view of the ocean from the lighthouse and if there was a shark out in those waters I would not be able to see in daylight, much less at night.  Then the red police truck drives up around the lighthouse.  I thought, that must be where the two cars that Deepak or Joran sees at the lighthous in their statements.  They were just parked there.  They were either waiting for them or they had no relation to the situation.  The more I watched the more things made sense to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 12:51:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:


I have a book right here beside the computer (it is where I keep track of the time differences)  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:52:20 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:


Haven't you seen the missing fence palings yet ?



I really have to speak with management about this...you monkeys are up to no good.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 12:53:18 AM
Hey late night monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:53:49 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:



LOL YW Lalas.. and I betcha Tibro has those invisible pens  :wink:
 Hugin Nemo before I forget.. I don't want written up in yours or Tibros book!   :wink:
  (http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/nemo.gif)


And sumpin I tryed to make myself LONG ago.. that turn out like crap.. but I'll post it anyhow.. LOL  

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/ArubaSux.jpg)



I can't tell what it says, but I hope I don't need my muffs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 12:54:06 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Patti the newspaper article that Klaas re-posted on about page 45 of previous thread says the cement basin is 4 foot by 4 foot.


Yep approx 4'by 4'. This was the pic i took in 2006. You can see the drainage box had been "remodeled" .

http://family.webshots.com/album/552851023UfiXEn


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:54:40 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Hey late night monkeys


Hi there Casa.  You are looking mighty cute tonight.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 12:56:17 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey late night monkeys


Hi there Casa.  You are looking mighty cute tonight.  :wink:


thanks, Lala'sMom!  I should be in the bed but you see where I am!  Anything happening tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:57:22 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:


I have a book right here beside the computer (it is where I keep track of the time differences)  :lol:  :lol:


 ROFL!!   :wink:

  Good night everyone!  I gotta get up early. and even get dressed up for work  :roll:  :roll:   Big boss man is conducting interviews for our store and 2 others of his and asked me to help?  ME?  ROFLMAO  !!  Cant type or talk for crap.   I busted laughin in his face this evening.  :lol:  :lol:
 He wasn't amused.. I WAS!   :)  Off to iron a suit..  :evil:  and hit the bed.
 Sweet dreams!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 12:58:53 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Patti the newspaper article that Klaas re-posted on about page 45 of previous thread says the cement basin is 4 foot by 4 foot.


I know, Sweetie.  I guess that would mean that the bag was about what
3 1/2 feet by 2 1/2 feet?

I'm just wondering about stuff.... staring at my computer wondering
if the bodies and heads that were found at the rocks were bagged
up and left in the water basin?????  If so.... why?  What is the purpose
of the basin?  Where does the water flow FROM?  It kinda looks like the
bag got stuck there because it was too big to fit through the grate?


Patti, the bag could be quite large as it is not lying flat out but is scrunched up around the contents.
I believe the water basin was used as a pick up point for whoever had the job of disposal, rather than someone trying to dispose of it through the water trap.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 12:58:53 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie thanks for bringing all that stuff over...I am so glad you didn't blow the margins.  Did you know that someone gave Tibro her own book.  I must speak to management about that...can't have everyone running around with pencils and books.  :roll:



LOL YW Lalas.. and I betcha Tibro has those invisible pens  :wink:
 Hugin Nemo before I forget.. I don't want written up in yours or Tibros book!   :wink:
  (http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/nemo.gif)


And sumpin I tryed to make myself LONG ago.. that turn out like crap.. but I'll post it anyhow.. LOL  

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/ArubaSux.jpg)



I can't tell what it says, but I hope I don't need my muffs.


  No muffs Lalas.. it just says Aruba Sux..
 Went to some website you can make different thingks a LONG time ago.. and it did not turn out well..!!
  K.. gotta go iron and get to bed  :roll:  :roll:  NIGHT!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 12:59:03 AM
night angie!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:00:00 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey late night monkeys


Hi there Casa.  You are looking mighty cute tonight.  :wink:


thanks, Lala'sMom!  I should be in the bed but you see where I am!  Anything happening tonight?


Absolutely!  Jossy was on Dana tonight and he talked about the boycott of his newspaper Diario and how the govt on Aruba is mad him because he uncovered a bribery scheme.  Seems that they are all angry they got caught. He also said that there are no records left on Max Devries any longer. Then he laid a bombshell on us.  He said that Chavez and MEP( the party in power) are big buddies.  The people of Aruba had better take their island back and quick.  Seems the Dutch are eager to align themselves with Venezuela.  It's all here somewhere you just have to skip backa nd forth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:01:06 AM
Night Angie.  I am staying up till DH gets home around 1.  Sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:01:55 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey late night monkeys


Hi there Casa.  You are looking mighty cute tonight.  :wink:


thanks, Lala'sMom!  I should be in the bed but you see where I am!  Anything happening tonight?


Absolutely!  Jossy was on Dana tonight and he talked about the boycott of his newspaper Diario and how the govt on Aruba is mad him because he uncovered a bribery scheme.  Seems that they are all angry they got caught. He also said that there are no records left on Max Devries any longer. Then he laid a bombshell on us.  He said that Chavez and MEP( the party in power) are big buddies.  The people of Aruba had better take their island back and quick.  Seems the Dutch are eager to align themselves with Venezuela.  It's all here somewhere you just have to skip backa nd forth.


Wasn't DeVires the one who did the show in Holland?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 01:03:27 AM
Klaas:

I think Anna is right.... the face in the reflection is the guy who has the
security business.  I'm just trying to figure out why he would be making
a documentary on the disposal of Natalee Holloway.  That's what the
video's look like to me.... a documentary.  Someone is trying very
hard to tell us something, alright,  but is that something even true?  Or is it just something that they put together to make us all think that Natalee
is dead?

If he, or anyone for that matter, was privy to the information on where
the police were going... to the degree that he could stand back and film
their cars as they arrive, and mosey around while they painted rocks and
supposedly, bag up the bodies, it just doesn't make any sense that he
would release the information without either being a witness to the
corruption, publicly, or be dead.... unless it is all a hoax.

Bear with me... because most of you think that the sons of the officials
were involved in the death of Natalee, even though there is no proof of that... but what if they weren't?  

What  if the arrests of their sons was a means to blackmail the officials to go along with the cover-up... or, in the case of the security businessman.... a kidnapping and a cover up... a documentary... to make it look like she was dead.  There is no  easier way to stop the search for a loved one's daughter, than to have evidence that she is dead.  But what if Natalee isn't dead?  What if all those pictures that we have been looking at are nothing more than make believe... a painted picture to go along with the painted rocks?

Maybe it's late... and I'm working overtime here... but it just doesn't make sense to me that you would have so many bodies lying around.  Who would go to so much trouble taking pictures, but nothing more????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:04:40 AM
Night night Angie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:08:50 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:12:10 AM
Could this guy be rubbing his eye? Do I see a finger under his eye?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:15:56 AM
I'm trying to figure out what is going on.  I asked a LONG time ago what was the significance of the bracelet Natalee had on and the picture here.  No one saw fit to answer me.  Now I am wondering where the heck this picture or "reflection" came from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:20:40 AM
Quote from: "casa"
I'm trying to figure out what is going on.  I asked a LONG time ago what was the significance of the bracelet Natalee had on and the picture here.  No one saw fit to answer me.  Now I am wondering where the heck this picture or "reflection" came from.


Casa, I just got here so I'll answer you the best I can. Others prolly know more or better, k?

My understanding is that the reflection in the windshield is from an aruba bay video and I think some believe it may be the videographer that took the videos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:21:11 AM
Quote from: "casa"
I'm trying to figure out what is going on.  I asked a LONG time ago what was the significance of the bracelet Natalee had on and the picture here.  No one saw fit to answer me.  Now I am wondering where the heck this picture or "reflection" came from.


The bracelet shows up in a still shot taken from the Aru Bay video of the bag in the water basin which shows a forearm wearing what appears to be the bracelet.

Also the reflection is taken from shots taken inside a car and shows the photographer (?).  This is where the video went on what appears to be a tour of the likely route that J2K took Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:23:43 AM
I won't be offended AT ALL to be corrected, but I'm thinking that he is of interest because some feel he knew what happened to Natalee and that's why he was taking the video. IF that's right, then identifying him could be the whole case solved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 01:23:57 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


That looks like robots.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:25:20 AM
If this face reflection is the same person as the feet shown in the video then it has to be a dark skinned person.  
I am still waiting for someone to tell me what they think is the extra that is attached about halfway along the foot shown in the video (the foot with the suspect 6 toes), so don't feel too bad, Casa.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 01:25:48 AM
Casa:

The reflection in the windshield, could be the man that took the video of
the bag of bodies in the basin.  

The bag in the basin, shows an arm with what looks like the wrist band
that Natalee was wearing, the blue one.

What I can't figure out is how many times do they have to dispose of her?

We see pictures at the rocks, which supposedly shows her lying on the
ground with her right arm cut off... or atleast that's what I saw.

And now, we have her in this bag... what?  The same day, or just days
before or after the rocks scene?

I'm not trying to be funny here, but in a way, it is funny... why is it that
the police are having such a hard time disposing of their evidence?

I smell a rat...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:26:13 AM
Thank you, crazybabyborg and Tibrogargan.  I asked questions much earlier tonight and was totally ignored.  I left and am just now coming back.  Sometimes I wonder why some questions are answered and others are not.  I think it depends on the person asking the question.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:26:17 AM
Tibro, you've been here for a while, and I'm curious: Is the face easier to "see" with the background erased or is it harder to make out?

I think this guy is rubbing one eye. I can almost make out a finger under the eye and a hand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 01:28:07 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


Hi My Monkeys,
Sorry I missed Dana's show, thanks to all of you who transcribed.  I have been looking at this  picture that Carp posted earlier today, that is the reflection of the windshield of the car in the videos. I'm having a problem with the size of things.  I was thinking that square object at the top was maybe the reflection of the picture posted of what someone thought was the folded newspaper with cd cartridge sitting on the dashboard.  Does anybody else think this? Could it appear that small? If so, what does that do for the size of the face we are seeing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:28:33 AM
Quote from: "casa"
I'm trying to figure out what is going on.  I asked a LONG time ago what was the significance of the bracelet Natalee had on and the picture here.  No one saw fit to answer me.  Now I am wondering where the heck this picture or "reflection" came from.


You will need to review that last thread to understand it all.  It is a bit long I have to admit.  I have been looking at it since early this morning.  The bracelet was one of those paper things that you get as admission to something like an amusement park that lets you go in and out without paying again and again.  I think her bracelet was for admission to the casino and stuff on  Aruba.

The little boy Max Devries that was lost on the jet ski is the one I am talking about.   Ms Marple sent questions for Dana to ask him tonight and one was about the case of Max Devries.  Jossy said the records no longer exist.  So sad.  Just told me what is about to happen with Natalee.  That island is past corruption I think they have turned are venturing into the depths of hell itself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:29:53 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Thank you, crazybabyborg and Tibrogargan.  I asked questions much earlier tonight and was totally ignored.  I left and am just now coming back.  Sometimes I wonder why some questions are answered and others are not.  I think it depends on the person asking the question.


casa, I'm sorry that happened. All I can say is that it has happened to me many times and I've seen it happen to others too. I honestly believe that it isn't personal, but either everyone is caught up in something, or folks don't have an answer and wait for someone else to respond and get distracted to someother point. {{HUGS}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:31:45 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Thank you, crazybabyborg and Tibrogargan.  I asked questions much earlier tonight and was totally ignored.  I left and am just now coming back.  Sometimes I wonder why some questions are answered and others are not.  I think it depends on the person asking the question.


I think it depends more on who is here at the time as some people have a theory about certain events and others are not so sure so they tend to let it pass.  And I am sure a lot do not have the time to read back so they miss some of the questions also or think it is too late to answer.  By the time I get here most days I have missed a lot of the discussions because of the time difference.  You can feel invisible sometimes too I agree, but it would not be intentional I am sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:32:38 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


Hi My Monkeys,
Sorry I missed Dana's show, thanks to all of you who transcribed.  I have been looking at this  picture that Carp posted earlier today, that is the reflection of the windshield of the car in the videos. I'm having a problem with the size of things.  I was thinking that square object at the top was maybe the reflection of the picture posted of what someone thought was the folded newspaper with cd cartridge sitting on the dashboard.  Does anybody else think this? Could it appear that small? If so, what does that do for the size of the face we are seeing?


Relative size would be really hard to determine, IMO, because of the slant of the windshield, hummingbird. Good question, though!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 01:32:44 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey late night monkeys


Hi there Casa.  You are looking mighty cute tonight.  :wink:


thanks, Lala'sMom!  I should be in the bed but you see where I am!  Anything happening tonight?


Absolutely!  Jossy was on Dana tonight and he talked about the boycott of his newspaper Diario and how the govt on Aruba is mad him because he uncovered a bribery scheme.  Seems that they are all angry they got caught. He also said that there are no records left on Max Devries any longer. Then he laid a bombshell on us.  He said that Chavez and MEP( the party in power) are big buddies.  The people of Aruba had better take their island back and quick.  Seems the Dutch are eager to align themselves with Venezuela.  It's all here somewhere you just have to skip backa nd forth.


Wasn't DeVires the one who did the show in Holland?


casa - PETER DeVries (sp?) did the show in Holland. MAX DeVries was a 14-year-old boy who apparently drowned in Aruba on May 12, 2004.

Shortly after Natalee vanished, the Aruba spin machine put out a story in Amigoe.com, quoting Dompig, that Max was supposedly alive and well in S. America, and an American insurance company was investigating ... in other words, an insurance scam. This was all to plant the idea that Natalee might be an insurance scam, too.

Not a word of it was true, of course.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:34:30 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
I'm trying to figure out what is going on.  I asked a LONG time ago what was the significance of the bracelet Natalee had on and the picture here.  No one saw fit to answer me.  Now I am wondering where the heck this picture or "reflection" came from.


You will need to review that last thread to understand it all.  It is a bit long I have to admit.  I have been looking at it since early this morning.  The bracelet was one of those paper things that you get as admission to something like an amusement park that lets you go in and out without paying again and again.  I think her bracelet was for admission to the casino and stuff on  Aruba.

The little boy Max Devries that was lost on the jet ski is the one I am talking about.   Ms Marple sent questions for Dana to ask him tonight and one was about the case of Max Devries.  Jossy said the records no longer exist.  So sad.  Just told me what is about to happen with Natalee.  That island is past corruption I think they have turned are venturing into the depths of hell itself.


When I went to Mexico with my girls we had a paper bracelet that let us eat and drink at our hotel.  Her bracelet could have been the same thing.  It proves that you are staying there and are all inclusive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:35:05 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=l.png


Angie - the one I see the face reflection most clearly is the next one after this

screen shot ending in : k.png


cbb This is what Angie posted and I went to look.  Then if you click on "next" so that it is xxxx k.png shot it is the one that is the clearest to me just the way it is.  See what you think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:35:43 AM
I thought the idea of her being shot in the head was ridiculous until I read Deepak saying "they will see that shit" and then I changed my mind.  I have been told by some very reliable sources that Natale was hit in the head.  Now that could be explained by the "she fell and hit her head" story.  But you can't explain a gunshot to the head.  That is the one thing that would make Paulus start the wheels turning to protect his son.  You can't hide it unless "no body,no crime".  Maybe she was shot accidently.  Maybe they thought she was dead and then she woke up and they had to do something, because they had already made a video and she was gonna tell what happened to her.  Something "bad happened".  After today, no wonder Joran keeps changing his story.  The Kalpoes may have been sent away at some point, but they know what happened.  Where is Carpe?  I have questions and he's not here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:38:27 AM
Many of us are invisible at times.  We are such a tight group of people that sometimes I think we just overlook each other thinking they know we see them and don't have time to say hello to everyone.  No snub intended to you at all.  You are so tiny we just missed you is all.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:39:22 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey late night monkeys


Hi there Casa.  You are looking mighty cute tonight.  :wink:


thanks, Lala'sMom!  I should be in the bed but you see where I am!  Anything happening tonight?


Absolutely!  Jossy was on Dana tonight and he talked about the boycott of his newspaper Diario and how the govt on Aruba is mad him because he uncovered a bribery scheme.  Seems that they are all angry they got caught. He also said that there are no records left on Max Devries any longer. Then he laid a bombshell on us.  He said that Chavez and MEP( the party in power) are big buddies.  The people of Aruba had better take their island back and quick.  Seems the Dutch are eager to align themselves with Venezuela.  It's all here somewhere you just have to skip backa nd forth.


Wasn't DeVires the one who did the show in Holland?


casa - PETER DeVries (sp?) did the show in Holland. MAX DeVries was a 14-year-old boy who apparently drowned in Aruba on May 12, 2004.

Shortly after Natalee vanished, the Aruba spin machine put out a story in Amigoe.com, quoting Dompig, that Max was supposedly alive and well in S. America, and an American insurance company was investigating ... in other words, an insurance scam. This was all to plant the idea that Natalee might be an insurance scam, too.

Not a word of it was true, of course.


Thanks!  I just am not quit up to speed with what most here know.  I spent the early days of this trying to help the cuz in any way I could.  Tried to find out as much as I could.  Since then I've had children going to college, children getting married and working two jobs and have not gotten to be here 24/7.  I'm sure I have missed a lot.  I don't rememver the boy who supposedly drowned.  I had my DeVires mixed up.  Thanks for the explanation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:39:26 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


Hi My Monkeys,
Sorry I missed Dana's show, thanks to all of you who transcribed.  I have been looking at this  picture that Carp posted earlier today, that is the reflection of the windshield of the car in the videos. I'm having a problem with the size of things.  I was thinking that square object at the top was maybe the reflection of the picture posted of what someone thought was the folded newspaper with cd cartridge sitting on the dashboard.  Does anybody else think this? Could it appear that small? If so, what does that do for the size of the face we are seeing?

Hummingbird - we have different people finding different things and enhancing/enlarging photos at different increments.  Can't really compare sizes because of that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 01:42:04 AM
crazy Borg:

Doesn't it look like he was moving forward or back during the frame so
you see a double vision of his face.  I wonder if someone could match
the two faces together to come up with his full face?  You know what
I mean?  You have one side of his face larger (left side) than the other
(right)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:42:11 AM
Casa - the only time questions go unanswered is either when nobody knows the answer or we are in the middle of Dana Pretzer or something else.  Normally even if I don't know the answer I'll at least tell you so.  I'm sorry I missed your questions earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:42:59 AM
Ever seen the three stooges? That's a spittin' image of Mo.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:43:31 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Many of us are invisible at times.  We are such a tight group of people that sometimes I think we just overlook each other thinking they know we see them and don't have time to say hello to everyone.  No snub intended to you at all.  You are so tiny we just missed you is all.  :lol:


Thanks, Lala's.  I feel invisible most of the time.  One of the reasons I hardly ever post and only read.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:44:23 AM
Could we show the image to Jossy? Maybe it's clear enough for him to recognize him?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:48:15 AM
Time for me to hug Nemo.  Night to all and especially to Casa...see you are not invisible.  See you wonderful monkeys later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:48:53 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


Hi My Monkeys,
Sorry I missed Dana's show, thanks to all of you who transcribed.  I have been looking at this  picture that Carp posted earlier today, that is the reflection of the windshield of the car in the videos. I'm having a problem with the size of things.  I was thinking that square object at the top was maybe the reflection of the picture posted of what someone thought was the folded newspaper with cd cartridge sitting on the dashboard.  Does anybody else think this? Could it appear that small? If so, what does that do for the size of the face we are seeing?

Hummingbird - we have different people finding different things and enhancing/enlarging photos at different increments.  Can't really compare sizes because of that.


FWIW it looks to me like a small radio sized thingy which could be sitting on the dashboard of the car.  In one shot I thought it was something outside of the car but the more I look it seems to be just a small squarish item.  Did someone earlier say it could be something to do with the stereo or am I confused??????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: casa on April 10, 2007, 01:49:12 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Time for me to hug Nemo.  Night to all and especially to Casa...see you are not invisible.  See you wonderful monkeys later.


Thanks lala's!  sweet dreams!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:49:52 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
crazy Borg:

Doesn't it look like he was moving forward or back during the frame so
you see a double vision of his face.  I wonder if someone could match
the two faces together to come up with his full face?  You know what
I mean?  You have one side of his face larger (left side) than the other
(right)


Well, we could crop the face in half, flip it and put it back together. Because it isn't a full front view, it will skew it, but I'll try. I really think this guy is rubbing his eye and I don't see a big size difference between one side of his face and the other. One eye is closed, IMO and the reason that side side is so messed up is because we're looking at his hand over his face.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:52:07 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Time for me to hug Nemo.  Night to all and especially to Casa...see you are not invisible.  See you wonderful monkeys later.


Night Lala's

Hey Casa - just do what I do.  Bowl in here and say "Here I am"   Works most times for me  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 01:54:28 AM
Klaas:

Does it make any sense to you that the police would bag up her body
and then toss it into a water basin to be picked up by someone else?

The police?????

The bag was no where near the rocks was it?   Where was it found?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 01:54:33 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Patti"
crazy Borg:

Doesn't it look like he was moving forward or back during the frame so
you see a double vision of his face.  I wonder if someone could match
the two faces together to come up with his full face?  You know what
I mean?  You have one side of his face larger (left side) than the other
(right)


Well, we could crop the face in half, flip it and put it back together. Because it isn't a full front view, it will skew it, but I'll try. I really think this guy is rubbing his eye and I don't see a big size difference between one side of his face and the other. One eye is closed, IMO and the reason that side side is so messed up is because we're looking at his hand over his face.


Would it work better by just reversing his reflection so it is not a mirror image - it is just as we would see it face to face.  No one has both sides of their face the same.  If you split in half and reverse it will look odd and nothing like the person in real life.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 01:56:02 AM
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Many of us are invisible at times.  We are such a tight group of people that sometimes I think we just overlook each other thinking they know we see them and don't have time to say hello to everyone.  No snub intended to you at all.  You are so tiny we just missed you is all.  :lol:


Thanks, Lala's.  I feel invisible most of the time.  One of the reasons I hardly ever post and only read.


Thanks Klaas I understand what your saying.

Casa, I know what you mean.  I feel invisible most of the time, I just pop in if I feel I should say something.  Most of the time some kind Monkey will answer me, but they do get caught up in wild discussions sometimes. :lol:  :lol:
I'm gonna take my invisible self to bed now.... sleep tight Monkeys...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 01:57:29 AM
Anyone else think it possible the rock painting, etc. was staged to create a crime scene as a part of Plan B.  Something happened to make it not possible to use and off them went to Plan C.

I think the Security Police or Beach Patrol was in the process of fabricating a crime scene of some sort with all that.  I mean, what are the chances of actually photographing those things otherwise?  

There is something very staged about the rock painting and some of the other aspects of the videos.  Maybe they were creating a crime scene to use in the framing of the security guards?  Then when that didn't work out, they couldn't use it and had to make it all disappear?

Could be anything, we just don't know what we are looking at or for.

JMO, of course.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:57:39 AM
This is REALLY rough, but, this is what I see:
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 01:59:36 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Patti"
crazy Borg:

Doesn't it look like he was moving forward or back during the frame so
you see a double vision of his face.  I wonder if someone could match
the two faces together to come up with his full face?  You know what
I mean?  You have one side of his face larger (left side) than the other
(right)


Well, we could crop the face in half, flip it and put it back together. Because it isn't a full front view, it will skew it, but I'll try. I really think this guy is rubbing his eye and I don't see a big size difference between one side of his face and the other. One eye is closed, IMO and the reason that side side is so messed up is because we're looking at his hand over his face.


Would it work better by just reversing his reflection so it is not a mirror image - it is just as we would see it face to face.  No one has both sides of their face the same.  If you split in half and reverse it will look odd and nothing like the person in real life.


No.... what I mean is if you look to the left you will see his left eye... it
is larger and you will see the left side of his lip.  I don't know why his
face is reflecting off the glass like that... it could be because he's moving
or because the light being reflected off the glass is changing because the
car is moving... but I definately (I think) see his left eye and the left side
of his mouth to the left of his face.  

Klaas:

Do you see it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 02:00:55 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "casa"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Many of us are invisible at times.  We are such a tight group of people that sometimes I think we just overlook each other thinking they know we see them and don't have time to say hello to everyone.  No snub intended to you at all.  You are so tiny we just missed you is all.  :lol:


Thanks, Lala's.  I feel invisible most of the time.  One of the reasons I hardly ever post and only read.


Thanks Klaas I understand what your saying.

Casa, I know what you mean.  I feel invisible most of the time, I just pop in if I feel I should say something.  Most of the time some kind Monkey will answer me, but they do get caught up in wild discussions sometimes. :lol:  :lol:
I'm gonna take my invisible self to bed now.... sleep tight Monkeys...


You are not invisible either Hummingbird.  Sometimes I log in and see all the monkeys that are also logged in and then when I get in here only a few of them are posting.  It can be disappointing but I think it is nice to say hello in person to the monkeys.  We are all special and have something to offer in our own way.  

Hugs to you and Casa


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:01:14 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rct3.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:01:27 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=l.png


Tibro,
I was thinking it was the reflection of this item, what ever it is on the dash of the car.   Klaas is this the window reflection we are looking at?  Or I'm I all wrong?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:02:19 AM
huh................maybe he's on a cell phone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 02:02:26 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
Klaas:

Does it make any sense to you that the police would bag up her body
and then toss it into a water basin to be picked up by someone else?

The police?????

The bag was no where near the rocks was it?   Where was it found?

No it doesn't. Not really near the rocks.  The bag and pond was near the Marriott and the Fisherman's Huts.  The rocks are on the other side of the Lighthouse.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:03:45 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&current=l.png


Tibro,
I was thinking it was the reflection of this item, what ever it is on the dash of the car.   Klaas is this the window reflection we are looking at?  Or I'm I all wrong?


It's the reflection in the windshield, hummingbird. Wait and I'll post the whole pic for you.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 02:04:13 AM
Goodnight All!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:05:49 AM
Tib,
You are such a kind hearted person, I like that about you very much and it really shows as with other Monkeys.
I'm just shy to post, is what I meant about myself. :oops:
Okay, now I'm really going this time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:06:26 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/k.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 02:06:35 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodnight All!


Goodnight Klaas - I am off to start dinner so will check back later for the solution to all this  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:07:07 AM
KLAAS!!!!! HELP! I"M sorry!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:09:13 AM
Oh Lord! Has Klaas gone to bed? I'm so sorry!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:10:17 AM
Oh CBB you really did it now.  I'm sorry you can blame me too because you were trying to show me the real picture of that reflection.  (how fast can you run???)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:12:07 AM
Well, hummingbird, you have the WHOLE picture to look at, right?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:12:39 AM
CBB where did you go?  Did you run off and leave me standing here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:13:38 AM
Look fast, hummingbird! I just figured out that I can delete it from my photobucket................I think that'll work!  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:14:52 AM
CBB
Back to me question, that little square can't be the cd case thing I was talking about.  You cleared up my question thanks!
I'm off to bed night.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:16:15 AM
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

WELL? Now we have a REALLY big blank to look at!
I'm getting the screaming giggles here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:16:27 AM
You think that Klaas will know it was us?  I don't see your picture any more but it didn't help the margin thing. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:18:05 AM
CBB
you've got me laughing myself sick here all by myself....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:19:41 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
CBB
Back to me question, that little square can't be the cd case thing I was talking about.  You cleared up my question thanks!
I'm off to bed night.....


You're not a hummingbird! You're a Chicken!  :lol:  :lol:

Well, I'm sorry Klaas! Whenever you find this, it's MY mess, and I'll supply Lala's with the pencils. Nite Hummingbird. I'm going to go hide under the covers and pretend I'm innocent!

 :roll:  Who? Me?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:21:02 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
You think that Klaas will know it was us?  I don't see your picture any more but it didn't help the margin thing. :shock:


Really? I hadn't noticed!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:22:12 AM
Hummingbird.............help me turn the page?

It's my version of sweeping the glass under the rug! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:23:41 AM
Goodnight CBB,

sleep tight, the squaking chickenbird is leaving the cage......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:24:14 AM
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Lord, she's left me again!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:25:04 AM
Oh hey that's an idea.  This will be the second one of your ideas tonight but I'm up over my head I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:25:53 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
You think that Klaas will know it was us?  I don't see your picture any more but it didn't help the margin thing. :shock:


hmmmmmmm, let me think about that one! Naw.........my name and picture next to the gigantic hole wouldn't even be a clue!  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:26:29 AM
No I didn't I'm still here I won't leave til the page turns.  How much further do we have to go?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:26:56 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Oh hey that's an idea.  This will be the second one of your ideas tonight but I'm up over my head I think.


Girl.........I am rolling! Tears streaming!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:27:32 AM
Yes! It's all okay now.  Now can we go to bed?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:28:06 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
No I didn't I'm still here I won't leave til the page turns.  How much further do we have to go?


WHEW!!!
Everything looks normal to me! I just got here, how about you, hummingbird?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:29:12 AM
:shock:
We will just pertend nothing ever happened OK?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 02:29:18 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Yes! It's all okay now.  Now can we go to bed?


Yep! Sleep tight, hummingbird! We'll teach 'em to run out on us, won't we??  :D  Nite, hon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: hummingbird7525 on April 10, 2007, 02:30:34 AM
:lol:  :lol:  :lol: nite


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: spooky112483 on April 10, 2007, 04:00:44 AM
:lol:  ya'll are too cute!
But did you really think that I wasn't paying attention? You should know by now that I'm the one that gets the lights in here and I see all late night shananigans!!
But maybe I won't tell on ya'.
(I lurve bribes :wink: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:10:50 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
One thing that did occur to me was in the  video the person with the camera gets out of the car and walks around.  I think this is where you see the feet of the camera person.  I noticed that after a few seconds they walk over to the basin with the bag.  How did they know that bag was there?  Maybe they didn't.  If that is the case then how is it possible that there is an image of a hand in the bag?  Some days I have more questions than answers.  As I watched, I could see the trip to the lighthouse and realized that the shark story is even more ridiculous than I first thought.  There is a clear view of the ocean from the lighthouse and if there was a shark out in those waters I would not be able to see in daylight, much less at night.  Then the red police truck drives up around the lighthouse.  I thought, that must be where the two cars that Deepak or Joran sees at the lighthous in their statements.  They were just parked there.  They were either waiting for them or they had no relation to the situation.  The more I watched the more things made sense to me.




The "She went to see the sharks" is a programmed lie.

If you have ever read about L. Ron H.

Be thinking along those lines. There is a shark, there is a Natalee
she was at one time in the area of the Lighthouse. Pieces are
true... in a "Joran Van der sloot enflamed hemorrhoidal kind of way."

...but he's lying. He tells the shark story in such a way to beat
lie detector tests. I suspect highly, this was taught to him.

I truly believe that thoroughly bent pecker is not smart
enough to know about it on his own. For the record, he's a
terrible liar and would fail any lie detector test! That is why he will
not take one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:16:12 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)



Looks like my ex-wife's mother-in-law.

Bless her little heart. (old furry wombat)  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:18:40 AM
I meant... mother...


My ex-wife's mother law would be MY MA.  :shock:

oh say it ain't so!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:21:51 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)


That looks like robots.  :shock:



The brudda's got a flippin honker like Jimmy Durante!!!!

ha cha cha chaaaaaaa


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:31:18 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Patti"
crazy Borg:

Doesn't it look like he was moving forward or back during the frame so
you see a double vision of his face.  I wonder if someone could match
the two faces together to come up with his full face?  You know what
I mean?  You have one side of his face larger (left side) than the other
(right)


Well, we could crop the face in half, flip it and put it back together. Because it isn't a full front view, it will skew it, but I'll try. I really think this guy is rubbing his eye and I don't see a big size difference between one side of his face and the other. One eye is closed, IMO and the reason that side side is so messed up is because we're looking at his hand over his face.


...and possibly

he's got one  hand up, obscuring his face with a camera, while he's looking through the view finder.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:36:34 AM
the bracelet

link

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ertetertyryrtyr.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:38:45 AM
alternate pic of the bracelet

(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ertetertyryrtyr-1.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 04:52:18 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Yes! It's all okay now.  Now can we go to bed?


Yep! Sleep tight, hummingbird! We'll teach 'em to run out on us, won't we??  :D  Nite, hon!


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

And I am going to be reported because I PRETENDED to have a book and pencils like Lala's.

You guys are for it, big time  :roll:  :roll:

Spooky caught you out because you forgot to leave the lights for her and I have seen all the banana peels you left behind because you were in such a hurry.  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 04:58:47 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/rfct.gif)



Looks like my ex-wife's mother-in-law.

Bless her little heart. (old furry wombat)  :)


Hey Carpe -  wombats are better looking than that reflection. :lol:  :lol:

You reminded me of that old conundrum - my fathers brother ....etc  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 04:59:41 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Patti"
crazy Borg:

Doesn't it look like he was moving forward or back during the frame so
you see a double vision of his face.  I wonder if someone could match
the two faces together to come up with his full face?  You know what
I mean?  You have one side of his face larger (left side) than the other
(right)


Well, we could crop the face in half, flip it and put it back together. Because it isn't a full front view, it will skew it, but I'll try. I really think this guy is rubbing his eye and I don't see a big size difference between one side of his face and the other. One eye is closed, IMO and the reason that side side is so messed up is because we're looking at his hand over his face.


...and possibly

he's got one  hand up, obscuring his face with a camera, while he's looking through the view finder.


BINGO!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 08:19:54 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Tib,
You are such a kind hearted person, I like that about you very much and it really shows as with other Monkeys.
I'm just shy to post, is what I meant about myself. :oops:
Okay, now I'm really going this time.


Be brave!  Jump on in here.  It's always nice to see you.  And casa!  Don't be shy.  We love you.  Many times I have nothing brilliant to say and hate to see OT all the time.  

Keep in mind that I probably show as logged in when I'm not in front of the computer.  I leave myself at Scared Monkeys so I can find my way back to the Cage in the right place.   I think lotsa folks do this.  It's really nothing personal.

Good morning!  Plenty of work to do.  With five men, my work is truly never done.   I'll be working and lurking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Frijole on April 10, 2007, 08:22:20 AM
Morning Peaches!  Spring game is this weekend.

Great day to all monkeys everywhere.... I'm a lurker mostly as I ran out of things to say.... so frustrated with the way the case has been handled but I do enjoy reading and seeing your sleuth-work.  Interesting work last night.

Keep up the good work. Hugs to all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 08:22:50 AM
Of course, I meant to say I hate to SEEM OT all the time.  And here I am OT again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 08:22:58 AM
LOL Tibro!!! 8)  :wink:


--------------


THE ARU-BAY VIDEO TAPE CREATORS MAY HAVE

VERY WELL BEEN DISCOVERED



You Decide fOR Yourself.


-----


slideshow

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&slideshow=true&interval=8


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Leslie on April 10, 2007, 08:37:58 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 08:38:45 AM
Good Morning Peaches, Frijole, Carpe and all other Monkeys!

Great work on the pics all.  Very Interesting.

I will be working and lurking too.... Yuk...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 08:43:23 AM
COMPARISONS SLIDE:

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/edroos1111.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 08:43:49 AM
oye kimmi

HI! 8)  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 09:14:07 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
oye kimmi

HI! 8)  :D


Good Morning... I figured you would have eaten that chocolate bunny by now!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 09:16:57 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I thought the idea of her being shot in the head was ridiculous until I read Deepak saying "they will see that shit" and then I changed my mind.  I have been told by some very reliable sources that Natale was hit in the head.  Now that could be explained by the "she fell and hit her head" story.  But you can't explain a gunshot to the head.  That is the one thing that would make Paulus start the wheels turning to protect his son.  You can't hide it unless "no body,no crime".  Maybe she was shot accidently.  Maybe they thought she was dead and then she woke up and they had to do something, because they had already made a video and she was gonna tell what happened to her.  Something "bad happened".  After today, no wonder Joran keeps changing his story.  The Kalpoes may have been sent away at some point, but they know what happened.  Where is Carpe?  I have questions and he's not here.

Lala's I agree with you here.  The possibility of her being shot is quite possible.  Don't forget that we had a poster called Viet Vet say that he was told by the Head Master that Joran it Natalee with a bat.  What if she was in such bad shape that Paulus knew Joran was in deep shit.  How was he going to explain it to the police.  Basically you can't so Paulus' only other alternative was to make sure she is dead.  Who would have a gun in the Van der Sloot home.  I think that would be Paulus the Judge in training and other illegal activities.  So now we have not only Joran in big trouble but Paulus also.  Kalpoes know exactly what happened to Natalee and who did it.  They saw Joran in his rage that night and did nothing to help Natalee.  Like Beth said to Deepak "did you help her Deepak" when she went to the cafe and confronted him.  Deepak knew he didn't and that was part of the reason why she died.  Deepak could have saved her and he didn't.  Deepak acts like such a tough guy but he couldn't even step forward and help Natalee because he was too afraid of Joran.  This is why Joran is sweet talking Deepak in the email exchange.  He is treating Deepak like the wuss he is.

I definitely believe that at one point Natalee did wake up and she started screaming.  Let's not forget that when they were first arrested one of the 3 rapists said she started freaking out.  What would make her freak out.  Her waking up and being sexually assulted by that monster Joran or Paulus and seeing other people around her and another person with a camera would make a person fight for their life.

Once Natalee woke up she was never going to be seen again whether she was dead or alive.  The risk was too great for the Van der Sloots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:30:34 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
LOL Tibro!!! 8)  :wink:


--------------


THE ARU-BAY VIDEO TAPE CREATORS MAY HAVE

VERY WELL BEEN DISCOVERED



You Decide fOR Yourself.


-----


slideshow

http://s55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/?action=view&slideshow=true&interval=8


---to clarify---

I MEAN

EACH ONE OF US

DOING THE FIGHTING. PERIOD


We are all Natalee's Freebirds.


with the exception of Charlie Rat...

I checked again, and apparently he is still a small penis. :P


hi rat! =)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:33:23 AM
yeah, Joran you should change your

statement again to read, she fell out of the back of Deepak's

car and hit her head on a bat.


-----------

stinking LIAR!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 09:33:42 AM
San, I think you are exactly right.  

Back to work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 09:39:47 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I thought the idea of her being shot in the head was ridiculous until I read Deepak saying "they will see that shit" and then I changed my mind.  I have been told by some very reliable sources that Natale was hit in the head.  Now that could be explained by the "she fell and hit her head" story.  But you can't explain a gunshot to the head.  That is the one thing that would make Paulus start the wheels turning to protect his son.  You can't hide it unless "no body,no crime".  Maybe she was shot accidently.  Maybe they thought she was dead and then she woke up and they had to do something, because they had already made a video and she was gonna tell what happened to her.  Something "bad happened".  After today, no wonder Joran keeps changing his story.  The Kalpoes may have been sent away at some point, but they know what happened.  Where is Carpe?  I have questions and he's not here.

Lala's I agree with you here.  The possibility of her being shot is quite possible.  Don't forget that we had a poster called Viet Vet say that he was told by the Head Master that Joran it Natalee with a bat.  What if she was in such bad shape that Paulus knew Joran was in deep shit.  How was he going to explain it to the police.  Basically you can't so Paulus' only other alternative was to make sure she is dead.  Who would have a gun in the Van der Sloot home.  I think that would be Paulus the Judge in training and other illegal activities.  So now we have not only Joran in big trouble but Paulus also.  Kalpoes know exactly what happened to Natalee and who did it.  They saw Joran in his rage that night and did nothing to help Natalee.  Like Beth said to Deepak "did you help her Deepak" when she went to the cafe and confronted him.  Deepak knew he didn't and that was part of the reason why she died.  Deepak could have saved her and he didn't.  Deepak acts like such a tough guy but he couldn't even step forward and help Natalee because he was too afraid of Joran.  This is why Joran is sweet talking Deepak in the email exchange.  He is treating Deepak like the wuss he is.

I definitely believe that at one point Natalee did wake up and she started screaming.  Let's not forget that when they were first arrested one of the 3 rapists said she started freaking out.  What would make her freak out.  Her waking up and being sexually assulted by that monster Joran or Paulus and seeing other people around her and another person with a camera would make a person fight for their life.

Once Natalee woke up she was never going to be seen again whether she was dead or alive.  The risk was too great for the Van der Sloots.



And they could not risk her being found because it would mean forensics would be taken, and their DNA would be found, as well as if she were shot, the bullet could be traced to the type of gun, even if it were never found, and there could be witnesses who knew Paulus had that certain type of gun.

I am not sure though, If I believe she was shot.  I just see the perps choking or beating her, They are all larger than Nat - I guess what I am trying to say is - those I have known with horrible tempers use their hands/fists first,  I just don't know.. Anything is possible IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 09:56:11 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I thought the idea of her being shot in the head was ridiculous until I read Deepak saying "they will see that shit" and then I changed my mind.  I have been told by some very reliable sources that Natale was hit in the head.  Now that could be explained by the "she fell and hit her head" story.  But you can't explain a gunshot to the head.  That is the one thing that would make Paulus start the wheels turning to protect his son.  You can't hide it unless "no body,no crime".  Maybe she was shot accidently.  Maybe they thought she was dead and then she woke up and they had to do something, because they had already made a video and she was gonna tell what happened to her.  Something "bad happened".  After today, no wonder Joran keeps changing his story.  The Kalpoes may have been sent away at some point, but they know what happened.  Where is Carpe?  I have questions and he's not here.

Lala's I agree with you here.  The possibility of her being shot is quite possible.  Don't forget that we had a poster called Viet Vet say that he was told by the Head Master that Joran it Natalee with a bat.  What if she was in such bad shape that Paulus knew Joran was in deep shit.  How was he going to explain it to the police.  Basically you can't so Paulus' only other alternative was to make sure she is dead.  Who would have a gun in the Van der Sloot home.  I think that would be Paulus the Judge in training and other illegal activities.  So now we have not only Joran in big trouble but Paulus also.  Kalpoes know exactly what happened to Natalee and who did it.  They saw Joran in his rage that night and did nothing to help Natalee.  Like Beth said to Deepak "did you help her Deepak" when she went to the cafe and confronted him.  Deepak knew he didn't and that was part of the reason why she died.  Deepak could have saved her and he didn't.  Deepak acts like such a tough guy but he couldn't even step forward and help Natalee because he was too afraid of Joran.  This is why Joran is sweet talking Deepak in the email exchange.  He is treating Deepak like the wuss he is.

I definitely believe that at one point Natalee did wake up and she started screaming.  Let's not forget that when they were first arrested one of the 3 rapists said she started freaking out.  What would make her freak out.  Her waking up and being sexually assulted by that monster Joran or Paulus and seeing other people around her and another person with a camera would make a person fight for their life.

Once Natalee woke up she was never going to be seen again whether she was dead or alive.  The risk was too great for the Van der Sloots.



And they could not risk her being found because it would mean forensics would be taken, and their DNA would be found, as well as if she were shot, the bullet could be traced to the type of gun, even if it were never found, and there could be witnesses who knew Paulus had that certain type of gun.

I am not sure though, If I believe she was shot.  I just see the perps choking or beating her, They are all larger than Nat - I guess what I am trying to say is - those I have known with horrible tempers use their hands/fists first,  I just don't know.. Anything is possible IMO.

If Natalee had to defend herself against Deepak she would kick the living daylights out of him.  It was Joran and only Joran who did the hitting.  I would not be surprised if Freddy was also violent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:04:38 AM
Aruba is so hell bent on destroying Jossy.  We would not be here discussing what happened if they only took care of the Sloots.  They let the Sloots win and for what.  Joran is laughing his ass off at the people on that island.

In the words of Joe M. every morning I wake up hoping something happened to the Sloots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:08:08 AM
CAMERMAN


IN ARUBAY

VIDEOS



-MORPH SLIDE


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dfdg56546.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 10:10:06 AM
Oh San, I can see them getting really pissed at her fighting back -

Bless her soul, it makes me so sad, knowing how scared she must have been. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 10:19:31 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
CAMERMAN


IN ARUBAY

VIDEOS



-MORPH SLIDE


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dfdg56546.png



Carpe,  funny thing about those videos.  Let it play through then take your mouse and slide the arrow back and forth slowly,  You'd be totally surprised at what you can pick up in a frame there.  I forget which video it is but one of fireworks you can not only see the car, but you can pick out people on the hill and standing off to the side watching, This is something that you didn't see just watching the video.  Pretty weird if you ask me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:26:28 AM
Good Morning monkeys!  The mystery is solved!  We now have the answer...or do we?  I agree that is person in the reflection..but I still have one problem...was this a red herring?  Why did he do this?  I am still abit confused there as to the why?  


If you haven't seen what happened on page 9 then youmust go back and read it.  It is always a good day when I can wake up and start laughing.  CBB and Hummingbird....GOTCHA!  Now, where are those pencils? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:28:45 AM
Carpe
Could you hear me calling you yesterday?  I still have a puzzle piece on those videos to solve.  The picture of the foot....that is not Ed Smith's foot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:33:04 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
Could you hear me calling you yesterday?  I still have a puzzle piece on those videos to solve.  The picture of the foot....that is not Ed Smith's foot.

Did you ever wonder if it was someone who was a witness and they took Ed Smith around.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:33:33 AM
I should clarify that statement...I know you said it was his wife...what I need is for us to prove it. Sorry, I am still on my first cup of coffee here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 10:39:41 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I should clarify that statement...I know you said it was his wife...what I need is for us to prove it. Sorry, I am still on my first cup of coffee here.


Okie dokie - about the foot.... I saw the pic of the wife.... I think the foot looks awfully skinny to be her foot.... I'm no expert, JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 10:39:48 AM
Carpe? I think Ed Smith's head is bigger than the reflection. His face if fuller than the that, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:39:56 AM
If the person in the six toe photo is barefoot then I will say it is NOT Yolanda.  Is the person wearing shoes or bare foot?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:39:57 AM
The female foot is that of Ed's lovely wife Yolande.

The pics are in my slide show.

NOW WHY WOULD A COUPLE WHO BOTH WORKED FOR

THE ARUBA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE being videotaping


the search for Natalee Holloway. Ed is well connected

he knows anybody who is anybody on T.B. Island.

 :arrow: HE KNEW WHERE TO BE AND AT WHICH TIME TO BE THERE,
             I highly suspect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 10:41:13 AM
if fuller? IS fuller. I need coffee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:43:39 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
if fuller? IS fuller. I need coffee!


You can't possibly have had any sleep.  Weren't you and another chicken in the cage making a mess last night?  I think Tibro was up late trying to scrub the walls or something.  Spooky knows.  She was in to turn out the lights and you two were still playing.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:43:54 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Carpe? I think Ed Smith's head is bigger than the reflection. His face if fuller than the that, IMO.




It is impossible to see the complete reflection...

with the images we are working with, I believe.



The reflection is hard to make out even with enhancement.

It is a reflection off auto glass, not a duplicate image of a person.


Something along looking at the mirrors at a CLOWN FUN HOUSE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:47:56 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
Could you hear me calling you yesterday?  I still have a puzzle piece on those videos to solve.  The picture of the foot....that is not Ed Smith's foot.

Did you ever wonder if it was someone who was a witness and they took Ed Smith around.


Oh I almost forgot...what about that other face in the reflection?  It fits the person with the six toes.  Wonder if Carpe saw that one? The one Yapperz found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on April 10, 2007, 10:48:06 AM
Another fluff travel piece about Aruba:

http://cggazette.com/absolutenm/templates/indextemp.aspx?articleid=2841&zoneid=1

Contact link also

Tell Mr. Greenfield what you think, Monkeys! Give him the facts about Aruba.

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:49:35 AM
Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
Another fluff travel piece about Aruba:

http://cggazette.com/absolutenm/templates/indextemp.aspx?articleid=2841&zoneid=1

Contact link also

Tell Mr. Greenfield what you think, Monkeys! Give him the facts about Aruba.

 8)


Thanks for bringing this to our attention.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:51:56 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
Could you hear me calling you yesterday?  I still have a puzzle piece on those videos to solve.  The picture of the foot....that is not Ed Smith's foot.

Did you ever wonder if it was someone who was a witness and they took Ed Smith around.


Oh I almost forgot...what about that other face in the reflection?  It fits the person with the six toes.  Wonder if Carpe saw that one? The one Yapperz found.



Lalas, what makes you so sure it is not his shoe and leg? Just curious?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:53:17 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
Could you hear me calling you yesterday?  I still have a puzzle piece on those videos to solve.  The picture of the foot....that is not Ed Smith's foot.

Did you ever wonder if it was someone who was a witness and they took Ed Smith around.


Oh I almost forgot...what about that other face in the reflection?  It fits the person with the six toes.  Wonder if Carpe saw that one? The one Yapperz found.



Yes, I did, but I haven't studied it yet. Will do. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 10:59:58 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I should clarify that statement...I know you said it was his wife...what I need is for us to prove it. Sorry, I am still on my first cup of coffee here.


Okie dokie - about the foot.... I saw the pic of the wife.... I think the foot looks awfully skinny to be her foot.... I'm no expert, JMO.
]

I have skinny feet.  

So does my Dad.  (Out of the hospital, back to the office and up to his old tricks, thank you for your prayers).

It's that heredity thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 11:02:48 AM
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on April 10, 2007, 11:06:59 AM
Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
Another fluff travel piece about Aruba:

http://cggazette.com/absolutenm/templates/indextemp.aspx?articleid=2841&zoneid=1

Contact link also

Tell Mr. Greenfield what you think, Monkeys! Give him the facts about Aruba.

 8)



Put a quarter in Mr. Greenfield's ear and his teeth roll back. Hope he enjoyed his free room and meals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:07:44 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here


Welcome Adoronron!!  I woke up late this morning so I'm not prepared to type yet, LOLOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on April 10, 2007, 11:07:55 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here



Coming through just fine Adoronron. Welcome!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 11:09:02 AM
adoronron, welcome!!!

I have several pages to catch up on, but was part of the photo discussions yesterday and asked about the reflection in some of the photos.  If there truly is a reflection of a face (which I had thought I'd seen, yesterday), then, who is holding the camera, and why is that reflection not in view?  Just a thought left over from last night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 11:12:49 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here


Hi adoronron - we can see you! We all were here a first time, once upon a time, many moons ago ... any minute now you'll be wanting an avatar and posting emoticons  :arrow:   8)   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 11:17:52 AM
Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
Another fluff travel piece about Aruba:

http://cggazette.com/absolutenm/templates/indextemp.aspx?articleid=2841&zoneid=1

Contact link also

Tell Mr. Greenfield what you think, Monkeys! Give him the facts about Aruba.

 8)


Sigh. More homework.  :cry:  I'll write tonight from home computer. Thanks JforN for bringing that to us.

By the way - all - Diario is updated today. Guess they had a very long Easter weekend holiday.

But it still looks different.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 11:18:03 AM
Looks like CBB & Hummingbird may have been close to answering my question about who's holding the camera....late last night...but CBB had had some technical difficulties.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 11:18:17 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I should clarify that statement...I know you said it was his wife...what I need is for us to prove it. Sorry, I am still on my first cup of coffee here.


Okie dokie - about the foot.... I saw the pic of the wife.... I think the foot looks awfully skinny to be her foot.... I'm no expert, JMO.
]

I have skinny feet.  

So does my Dad.  (Out of the hospital, back to the office and up to his old tricks, thank you for your prayers).


It's that heredity thing.


Do you have MONKEY toes? :lol:  :lol:

Great to hear your dad is doing well!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 11:19:48 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here


Welcome adoronron!!!!  Please join us!  we're really a friendly bunch!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:20:03 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here



Welcome to the cage!  Jump right in and get started.  So glad you are here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 11:22:06 AM
No monkey toes altho I have been known to have "popsicle toes" on occasion!

Thanks, Kimmy.  My dad is so crazy.  They let him out of the hospital Sat. morning and he went to the office on Monday!  I guess that's why he's still kicking!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:22:28 AM
adoronron has been corresponding with me via email.  He/she has sent photos of Natalee on the bar and others for viewing descrepancies.  He/she has been following the case.

Just thought you guys should know.  Now....back to my first cup of coffee, lol  :lol:   I hate waking up late!! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:22:35 AM
I have skinny feet also.  My first question is this... in the six toe pic (not really, but nevermind) is the person wearing shoes?  That is the first thing I need to know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:24:12 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
adoronron has been corresponding with me via email.  He/she has sent photos of Natalee on the bar and others for viewing descrepancies.  He/she has been following the case.

Just thought you guys should know.  Now....back to my first cup of coffee, lol  :lol:   I hate waking up late!! :lol:


Morning Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:28:37 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have skinny feet also.  My first question is this... in the six toe pic (not really, but nevermind) is the person wearing shoes?  That is the first thing I need to know.

Don't you think the feet are tooooo black to be bare feet?  Even for a person of color (is that politically correct)?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Foot5.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 11:33:42 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have skinny feet also.  My first question is this... in the six toe pic (not really, but nevermind) is the person wearing shoes?  That is the first thing I need to know.


I see five toes on a bare foot and some rocks.

Looked like a good time to be wearing some flip flops.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 11:35:32 AM
That could be a bare foot or one with a sandal on.  

IMHO, It is not to dark to be a bare foot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 11:37:42 AM
I won't be able to repond quickly to posts. I work for a corporation out of my home office and am busy all day. I have this computer on a desk that's near the desk with my business computer.

On the video frames. I'm beginning to wonder if the AruBay videos were taken with a VHS camera. If so, the videos may have been recorded on a used tape that had already been recorded. We may be seeing face images from the old recording that were not entirely erased from the tape.

I picked an avatar. Don't know why it didn't show, but I'll get it figured out.

Is there a way to put pictures residing on my PC into a post?

I often type fast and sometimes mis spell stuff. Is there a way to spell check a post?

I'm a guy, a middle aged guy.

Could someone please contact Al Gore for me and ask him to send some of that global warming to the midwest.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 11:37:58 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Welcome.jpg)

Hi Adoronron! Glad you could join us!

2NJ and Lala's are picking on me, but we're a friendly bunch!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 11:38:19 AM
I see five toes too. and the cuff of a jeans leg.  Could it be a guy?  I'm thinking that nice weather in Aruba, women would either be in shorts/skirt or capri's, maybe jeans, but Would think they'd want to show off the nice tan.

again, JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 11:40:00 AM
Hi, Adoronron!  

Where in the midwest are you?  We have several midwesterners (and some wannabes of course).

I'm working too.  Wish it was from home.  Probably get even less done.

Back to working.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 11:40:15 AM
Welcome adoronron


When you do finally get ahold of Al Gore, make sure he sends some of that "Global Warming" to Maine,  Its freezing here and we still have too much snow!  

We haven't had snow here in Mid April since the mid 80's

Ms.V


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 11:40:39 AM
:oops:  :oops:

OMG! Klaas.........somethings wrong with my photobucket.  :oops:

I've posted that before and it didn't blow anything!

 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Have I mentioned that I have an evil twin sister that constantly gets me in trouble???  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:41:10 AM
Quote from: "adoronron"
I won't be able to repond quickly to posts. I work for a corporation out of my home office and am busy all day. I have this computer on a desk that's near the desk with my business computer.

On the video frames. I'm beginning to wonder if the AruBay videos were taken with a VHS camera. If so, the videos may have been recorded on a used tape that had already been recorded. We may be seeing face images from the old recording that were not entirely erased from the tape.

I picked an avatar. Don't know why it didn't show, but I'll get it figured out.

Is there a way to put pictures residing on my PC into a post?

I often type fast and sometimes mis spell stuff. Is there a way to spell check a post?

I'm a guy, a middle aged guy.

Could someone please contact Al Gore for me and ask him to send some of that global warming to the midwest.


Avatars - need to be someplace like photobucket then the link put in the third option in your profile for avatars (it's a bug in the forum software)

Photos - for posts, photos also have to be somewhere on the internet like photobucket then you paste the link with the IMG tags.

If you have something you'ld like as an avatar you can email to me and I'll resize and set you up with it until you can get a photobucket account started.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:42:14 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
:oops:  :oops:

OMG! Klaas.........somethings wrong with my photobucket.  :oops:

I've posted that before and it didn't blow anything!

 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Have I mentioned that I have an evil twin sister that constantly gets me in trouble???  :roll:

It's fine, I don't see a problem?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:44:35 AM
adoronron - there is no forum software for spell check but I think some people use some other spell checking thing..I don't remember what it is though.

Personally, I like the typo's - often good for a laugh, LOL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 11:44:56 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
:oops:  :oops:

OMG! Klaas.........somethings wrong with my photobucket.  :oops:

I've posted that before and it didn't blow anything!

 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Have I mentioned that I have an evil twin sister that constantly gets me in trouble???  :roll:

It's fine, I don't see a problem?


You don't see the "Welcome" push the margins??? I'm SOWWY!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 11:45:58 AM
Good morning friends..... :D

Welcome ado....!  

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n207/Mere_08/welcome.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:46:57 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
:oops:  :oops:

OMG! Klaas.........somethings wrong with my photobucket.  :oops:

I've posted that before and it didn't blow anything!

 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

Have I mentioned that I have an evil twin sister that constantly gets me in trouble???  :roll:

It's fine, I don't see a problem?


You don't see the "Welcome" push the margins??? I'm SOWWY!!!


CBB - what browser are you using?  Did you switch recently?  Sometimes that can make a difference.  No, it's not blowing the margins for me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 11:47:45 AM
adoronron,

Having used a VHS, I would never have thought that the images/reflections were left over from a previous recording.  If that's the case, it would explain why the reflections discussed do not show the camera person.  

I have relatives in the midwest, but here in the east, we'd like some warming, as well.  It was colder, with flurries, on Easter Sunday than it was Christmas & New Year's Eve.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:47:48 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have skinny feet also.  My first question is this... in the six toe pic (not really, but nevermind) is the person wearing shoes?  That is the first thing I need to know.

Don't you think the feet are tooooo black to be bare feet?  Even for a person of color (is that politically correct)?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Foot5.jpg)


Thank you for saying it that way.  I was trying to figure out how to mention the dark feet in comparison to the person we think it is.  If this person is barefoot in the video..then it is not Yolanda.  If the foot is wearing shoes that is another story.  I see painted toenails in the video, so I think maybe barefoot, but look what they are walking on...it appears to be gravel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 11:50:10 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good morning friends..... :D

Welcome ado....!  

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n207/Mere_08/welcome.gif)


Yeah, Mere! I was just trying to come up with a nickname! Perfect choice! Ado is just the right size! Kudos from CBB.

Boop Boop Ado!  :wink:

You're officially a monkey, Ado!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 11:50:29 AM
Chicago_510 mentioned yesterday that he/she thought the walking on gravel/stones was painful...iirc....I think the person is barefoot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 11:56:12 AM
Klaas? I don't know what a browser is, but if I can find an image of one, betcha I could make an avatar out of it!

 I've been on a laptop since February and it's a flatscreen that stretches stuff anyway. 100% is too big, and 75% is too small.

Well, if you're happy, I'm happy!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:57:31 AM
This was one of the messages on the aru-bay site back in June 2005 prior to the site going down.  This message is referencing the lighthouse/rock portion of the videos:

"Before rumors start we would like to mention that this site was here about a year ago allready..................... This is what we saw yesterday morning......it's mostly uncut video so tell EVERYBODY you can see for yourself what's going on in Aruba at www.aru-bay.com and more keeps comming...............but we had to copyright it (as you will notice when you watch the clips) to prevent them from being mis-used and we tried to blurr out the faces of local and international lawenforcement agents(IF they are but we rather be safe than sorry) .this footage is for personal use only........and due to the seriousness of the situation we did not add any music to these clips.............this footage was taped on the 11th of june 2005 in the early morning hours behind the lighthouse, were the tree suspects .....NOT THE BLACK SECURITY'S WHO WERE ACCUSSED BY THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA (CNN FOX AND OTHERS)BUT this is the area the three who saw her last said they went and EVERYBODY + man's best friend were there on a very VERY low profile so draw your own conclusion......... BUT for official statements let's wait and pray for a positive outcome and why has nobody asked the official spokes people about the bottle of lysol I saw in the Aruba Today Daily News picture in the beginning of the week ???????does it have anything to to with this case?????????????????SO PLEASE .............GO DO YOU JOB WITH REAL FACTS AND INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS AND KEEPING HER LOVED-ONES FEELINGS IN MIND.........AND DON"T MAKE IT A RACIAL THING.............THERE ARE JUST GOOD PEOPLE AND BAD PEOPLE IN EVERY RACE AND COUNTRY.........SO IN CASE YOU DIDN"T KNOW...... NOW YOU KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!........... AND MAY GOD BE YOUR GUIDE BEFORE YOU EVER HAVE TO INFORM THE PUBLIC OF ANYTHING AGAIN............................."

The aru-bay site seems to be upset about the arrest of the security guards.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 12:01:52 PM
I wonder what the shiny spots to the left of the foot are? At first I thought it was some sort of metal strip and that it ran under a black sandal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 12:02:05 PM
Makes me wonder how they/he/she knew to go there at that hour...and also wonder how the other locations were determined, if not from inside info....just revisiting old thoughts after rereading that aru-bay notice....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: LilPuma on April 10, 2007, 12:02:44 PM
Welcome Adoronon!  The Midwest Rocks!  
You don't have to believe me, just ask Old Fart.   :wink:

Just checking in to see if my post-Easter avatar is showing up ok.  Have to go to the FP to e-mail the Miami Press thingy about a guy.......... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:04:28 PM
Confession was June 10th I believe, then came the retraction.  Remember the Lighthouse was mentioned the night of the confession.  So, what did they find in the rock area?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 12:20:21 PM
********** WELCOME TO SCARED MONKEYS adoronron************* 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 12:23:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was one of the messages on the aru-bay site back in June 2005 prior to the site going down.  This message is referencing the lighthouse/rock portion of the videos:

"Before rumors start we would like to mention that this site was here about a year ago allready..................... This is what we saw yesterday morning......it's mostly uncut video so tell EVERYBODY you can see for yourself what's going on in Aruba at www.aru-bay.com and more keeps comming...............but we had to copyright it (as you will notice when you watch the clips) to prevent them from being mis-used and we tried to blurr out the faces of local and international lawenforcement agents(IF they are but we rather be safe than sorry) .this footage is for personal use only........and due to the seriousness of the situation we did not add any music to these clips.............this footage was taped on the 11th of june 2005 in the early morning hours behind the lighthouse, were the tree suspects .....NOT THE BLACK SECURITY'S WHO WERE ACCUSSED BY THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA (CNN FOX AND OTHERS)BUT this is the area the three who saw her last said they went and EVERYBODY + man's best friend were there on a very VERY low profile so draw your own conclusion......... BUT for official statements let's wait and pray for a positive outcome and why has nobody asked the official spokes people about the bottle of lysol I saw in the Aruba Today Daily News picture in the beginning of the week ???????does it have anything to to with this case?????????????????SO PLEASE .............GO DO YOU JOB WITH REAL FACTS AND INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS AND KEEPING HER LOVED-ONES FEELINGS IN MIND.........AND DON"T MAKE IT A RACIAL THING.............THERE ARE JUST GOOD PEOPLE AND BAD PEOPLE IN EVERY RACE AND COUNTRY.........SO IN CASE YOU DIDN"T KNOW...... NOW YOU KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!........... AND MAY GOD BE YOUR GUIDE BEFORE YOU EVER HAVE TO INFORM THE PUBLIC OF ANYTHING AGAIN............................."

The aru-bay site seems to be upset about the arrest of the security guards.




Can we all chip in a few bucks & buy that fartknocker a decent spell checker.

I mean, I mispell things.... but come *AWN :wink: :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 12:29:45 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi, just seeing if I can post. My first time here


Howdy adoronron!! :D   Welcome


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 12:31:44 PM
Peaches asked me where in the midwest I'm located. So, to answer I shall attempt to post this picture.
(http://[img]http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/IMG_0564.jpg)[/img]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 12:31:49 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/thTags2GoCovBridgeWelcome-vi.gif)

Welcome to Adoronron!

And to all Monkeys

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/th1goodmorning.gif)



CARPE,

Do you think that the videos could have been of the creation of a fake crime scene to frame the security guards?  When that fell through because of MB students in the lobby all night, they had to go back and un-do the crime scene?

Could that be what we are seeing?

Also remember the vandalization of the cemetery.  That might also account for spare body parts we seem to encounter at every turn.

Just thoughts but is this what you mean about the vids and Ed Smith knowing they were not of any actual crime scene?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 12:33:10 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
If the person in the six toe photo is barefoot then I will say it is NOT Yolanda.  Is the person wearing shoes or bare foot?



I am pretty sure barefoot, lalas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 12:35:36 PM
O/T

Excellent Spell Check I have used without problems for years:

http://www.iespell.com/

Works well with IE.  Will check just about anything you type anywhere on the Internet with a right click of the mouse.


 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 12:35:48 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
I won't be able to repond quickly to posts. I work for a corporation out of my home office and am busy all day. I have this computer on a desk that's near the desk with my business computer.

On the video frames. I'm beginning to wonder if the AruBay videos were taken with a VHS camera. If so, the videos may have been recorded on a used tape that had already been recorded. We may be seeing face images from the old recording that were not entirely erased from the tape.

I picked an avatar. Don't know why it didn't show, but I'll get it figured out.

Is there a way to put pictures residing on my PC into a post?

I often type fast and sometimes mis spell stuff. Is there a way to spell check a post?

I'm a guy, a middle aged guy.

Could someone please contact Al Gore for me and ask him to send some of that global warming to the midwest.


Don't worry about the typo's buddy!!  Angie's the typo queen and we just blame it on her lol.  It's all good.  8)

We sure need some warm weather in St. Louis.  Lost all my Tulips, Easter Lillies.  Also damage to peaches and strawberries.  darn.
My bad.  Good Morning everybody.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:36:04 PM
adoronron - to fix the size of your photo in photobucket:

1.  In photobucket, click on EDIT

2.  Click on RESIZE

3.  Choose "Website & Email" 320 x 240 and that will be a better size for the forum


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 12:36:31 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I wonder what the shiny spots to the left of the foot are? At first I thought it was some sort of metal strip and that it ran under a black sandal.


Morning Monkeys, I wonder if it is a small handgun? Crazy guess....

(http://www.eptv.co.uk/vector/handgun.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 12:36:55 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good morning friends..... :D

Welcome ado....!  

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n207/Mere_08/welcome.gif)


Morning Mere!!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 10, 2007, 12:37:58 PM
Hello,I am Tiger.I am new here.I have been following the case.It seems to me to be an easy case to solve,but others have prevented it.I hope and pray for answers and justice,soon.TIGER


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:38:57 PM
Okay who blew the margins???  Was it the new guy?  I knew I should have read the rules to Ado from the very beginning...just kidding...no worries.


Barefoot...not Yolanda's foot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 12:39:46 PM
Oops, sorry everyone for screwing up the margins with that photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 12:40:18 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Hello,I am Tiger.I am new here.I have been following the case.It seems to me to be an easy case to solve,but others have prevented it.I hope and pray for answers and justice,soon.TIGER



Howdy Tiger!!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:40:19 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Hello,I am Tiger.I am new here.I have been following the case.It seems to me to be an easy case to solve,but others have prevented it.I hope and pray for answers and justice,soon.TIGER


Welcome to the cage!  Jump in the water's fine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 12:41:40 PM
Darn multitasking is getting in the way of my monkey business.  BBL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 12:41:41 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Oops, sorry everyone for screwing up the margins with that photo.


It's possible you  were falsely accused...happened to me last night.  :roll:

Never admit to anything unless you are caught red handed. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 12:42:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Oops, sorry everyone for screwing up the margins with that photo.


It's possible you  were falsely accused...happened to me last night.  :roll:

Never admit to anything unless you are caught red handed. :wink:


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Rock On!!  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:46:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
adoronron - to fix the size of your photo in photobucket:

1.  In photobucket, click on EDIT

2.  Click on RESIZE

3.  Choose "Website & Email" 320 x 240 and that will be a better size for the forum


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:46:49 PM
Welcome Tiger!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 12:47:36 PM
Anna,

All great thoughts & questions.

In my heart of hearts, I KNOW the rocks site was a ersatz

crime scene. It was probably done for diversiony reasons,

and while people were watching that scene...

Dirty Hand was switching the shells around to get people
to try and guess under which one was the magical peanut.

----

The graveyard vandalism did not come until JANUARY 12th, 2006

So, I don't think that one was about 'body parts.' That was a violent,

angry message sent to somebody. > READ PROBABLY ODUBER, that
idiot.


The fem. foot in #24 of the cam person may or may not be Yolande.
Who knows.

Ed seems to be the guy with the videos though. How terribly convenient that he's plugged into EVERYONE being the Pres. of the Chamber of
Commerce of Aruba.

That's a great way to really tap into to things and know in advance where
to be staioned before they happen.

-- "I heard It Through The Grape Vine" Gladys Knight & HER PIPS
8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 12:47:54 PM
Welcome to Tiger!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Avatars/Adoptables/thtiger.gif)


Note to Tibro,

It is a bit warmer today here but I am wearing my Uggs for Tibro.

 :D

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 12:48:38 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Oops, sorry everyone for screwing up the margins with that photo.


WE STILL LOVE YOU! :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 12:50:24 PM
>>>> I'm gonna take Anna up on that spell check. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 12:53:09 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Hello,I am Tiger.I am new here.I have been following the case.It seems to me to be an easy case to solve,but others have prevented it.I hope and pray for answers and justice,soon.TIGER


Hi Tiger - good to see you here!!!!

WELCOME!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 12:55:17 PM
Run for cover. Could be some margin destruction again. I've resized the photo as was suggested and am going to try to it again in a minute or so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 12:55:45 PM
I don't have one shred of proof of this and am just too rushed to go through any photos I may have saved however:

If you have a better resolution and enlarge the "bare foot" it turns out to be a sort of moccasin with triangular light contrasting stitches for what we are seeing as toenails.

Since I am offering no proof of this, feel free to believe/disbelieve at will.  I just saw long ago a very clear enlargement of that foot.  I too thought it a barefoot and really liked that idea.  Seems I discovered it was not maybe in a discussion with Sharon once upon a time.

The higher res photo may have been posted by Kermit at BFN.  If anyone has access to his photos, you might find it there but the "toenails" look like perfect triangles, in a pattern of stitching joining the top part of the shoe to the bottom.

Someone else may remember it that way as well for verification but as i said, feel free to take this or leave it.

Have to work.  BBL when I can.  

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/thfrtyur.jpg)

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 12:55:51 PM
Hey, bb, don't shoot!  

Adoronron, I think bleachedblack's handgun blew this page.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 12:56:54 PM
Oops, my post ended up on the next page... :oops:

Hello, Tiger.  Welcome.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 12:57:58 PM
One more thought on bare foot.

Note the great toenail is same size as fifth one, little toe?  :wink:

Now off to work. . . .


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 12:59:03 PM
Second attempt at giving Peaches a photo hint as to where in the midwest I'm located.(http://[img]http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/IMG_0564.jpg)[/img]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 12:59:11 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Run for cover. Could be some margin destruction again. I've resized the photo as was suggested and am going to try to it again in a minute or so.

Actually, once you resize it the photo will resize here as well automatically  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:00:58 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Welcome.jpg)

Hiya, Tiger! We're glad you could come!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:02:19 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Hey, bb, don't shoot!  

Adoronron, I think bleachedblack's handgun blew this page.... :wink:


Sshhhhh Lala's is writing furiously... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:03:47 PM
adoronron the pic says Ohio?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:04:10 PM
I heard that!!! :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:04:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Run for cover. Could be some margin destruction again. I've resized the photo as was suggested and am going to try to it again in a minute or so.

Actually, once you resize it the photo will resize here as well automatically  :wink:


OHHHHHH!

That works better than deleting it from photobucket, doesn't it?
I just left a big hole last night.
Klaas, when you go to bed from now on, I'm going with you!

Well, you know what I mean..... :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 01:06:09 PM
CBB
I laughed so hard this morning when I saw what happened in the cage last night.  It was the best thing to start my day.  I have been happy ever since.   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:06:46 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Run for cover. Could be some margin destruction again. I've resized the photo as was suggested and am going to try to it again in a minute or so.

Actually, once you resize it the photo will resize here as well automatically  :wink:


OHHHHHH!

That works better than deleting it from photobucket, doesn't it?
I just left a big hole last night.
Klaas, when you go to bed from now on, I'm going with you!

Well, you know what I mean..... :oops:

I saw that, LOLOL  :lol:   Yes, once you resize it in photobucket and "refresh" in the forum, it will show up the new size in the forum.  Whatever size you have made it in your photobucket it will change here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 10, 2007, 01:06:52 PM
Ado, alrighty then!  A Buckeye.  

Lotta college football fans here.

We can't all be from NE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:07:28 PM
Bleachedblack - what happened to your avatar?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:07:54 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
CBB
I laughed so hard this morning when I saw what happened in the cage last night.  It was the best thing to start my day.  I have been happy ever since.   :lol:  :lol:


Whew! To all the new guys: If Lala's happy, EVERYBODY'S happy!!!!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:09:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Bleachedblack - what happened to your avatar?


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/blchblk.jpg)

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/blchblk.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:12:04 PM
Oh no I was neeked ? Thanks Klaas.


Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:48 pm

I am here. Can’t say the things I want…

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:50 pm

Some people on the other side of the pond know more than what they are saying. There testimony, there’s security footage, there are witnesses.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm

The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 5:00 pm

The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 5:03 pm

The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 10, 2007, 01:12:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Run for cover. Could be some margin destruction again. I've resized the photo as was suggested and am going to try to it again in a minute or so.

Actually, once you resize it the photo will resize here as well automatically  :wink:


OHHHHHH!

That works better than deleting it from photobucket, doesn't it?
I just left a big hole last night.
Klaas, when you go to bed from now on, I'm going with you!

Well, you know what I mean..... :oops:

I saw that, LOLOL  :lol:   Yes, once you resize it in photobucket and "refresh" in the forum, it will show up the new size in the forum.  Whatever size you have made it in your photobucket it will change here.


Then it's going to be there forever, because I can't resize what I deleted!
It's a memorial to the "don't" list for the cage!
(I just checked. It's still there. How many more pages until we get a new cage? This one is a little messy.  :roll: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:14:31 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Oh no I was neeked ? Thanks Klaas.


Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:48 pm

I am here. Can’t say the things I want…

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:50 pm

Some people on the other side of the pond know more than what they are saying. There testimony, there’s security footage, there are witnesses.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm

The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 5:00 pm

The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 5:03 pm

The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left?


Is Simian talking about Guido?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 01:15:08 PM
Klaasend,

In Photobucket do I choose avatar size in order to get a pic to the correct size to use as an avatar? I know it may be a dumb question, but given what happened on my first picture attempt...................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:16:34 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaasend,

In Photobucket do I choose avatar size in order to get a pic to the correct size to use as an avatar? I know it may be a dumb question, but given what happened on my first picture attempt...................

Yes, that will probably work although I haven't done avatars that way.  Then you need to copy from photobucket the url without the IMG tags and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.  Give it a try and see if it works.  We can always fix it  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:17:50 PM
Kermit really had some great images. I don't know where he ever went?(Fingers crossed about the margins with this one)

(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7214/arubayinsidecar33kd.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:24:56 PM
Rancho Notorioso is 5 min from the light house. Wonder if they were able to get anything? The lighthouse area is on a high-point of land so from 5 min away they could possibly get a visual on tape.

(http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7226/arubayvideo4biker6qa.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 01:29:03 PM
I never seem to see anything in these pix, but the one bb just posted - the colorful thing - could that be a shirt? looks like an arm, "flesh color," extending out toward the front.

Welcome Tiger. Wait until you meet Cat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:31:27 PM
Klaasend wrote;
Quote

Is Simian talking about Guido?


I personally don't think this refernece was to Guido. But who across the pond might have security footage? I don't think Guido was ever anyone's boyfriend from earlier in the week. JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:33:47 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
I never seem to see anything in these pix, but the one bb just posted - the colorful thing - could that be a shirt? looks like an arm, "flesh color," extending out toward the front.

Welcome Tiger. Wait until you meet Cat.


OK, I know I'm being silly but this is what it looks like to me  :lol:

(http://www.magic4u.com/shop/picts/wignose.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 01:33:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Oh no I was neeked ? Thanks Klaas.


Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:48 pm

I am here. Can’t say the things I want…

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:50 pm

Some people on the other side of the pond know more than what they are saying. There testimony, there’s security footage, there are witnesses.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 4:56 pm

The 5th suspect has an alibi so strong that he has everybody baffled.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 5:00 pm

The 5th suspect was the boyfriend from earlier in the week.

Simian Says:
June 22nd, 2005 at 5:03 pm

The party-goers said the 5th one was with them. He was the host. How could he have left?


Is Simian talking about Guido?


'on the other side of the pond'...HI, Marriott...?  Just trying to put testimony, security footage & witnesses into it.  Klaas, I get what you are saying...just can't put all the pieces in place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:35:07 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Klaasend wrote;
Quote

Is Simian talking about Guido?


I personally don't think this refernece was to Guido. But who across the pond might have security footage? I don't think Guido was ever anyone's boyfriend from earlier in the week. JMHO

Well he could have been Joran's boyfriend from earlier in the week  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 01:35:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
I never seem to see anything in these pix, but the one bb just posted - the colorful thing - could that be a shirt? looks like an arm, "flesh color," extending out toward the front.

Welcome Tiger. Wait until you meet Cat.


OK, I know I'm being silly but this is what it looks like to me  :lol:

(http://www.magic4u.com/shop/picts/wignose.jpg)

It does look like that :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 10, 2007, 01:36:51 PM
Anige had said it looked like a stuffed animal, namely a parrot....I had the same thought later looking at it...those look like bird feet extending from it towards the console... :oops: sorry...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 01:42:32 PM
klaas - I noticed you posted Madison Whatley's POV; thanks, that was interesting reading.

Then I noticed that it's on the Natalee index instead of Important Case Documents. ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:43:23 PM
Aren't there some key chains that have a "yarn ball" at the end of them.  Trying to find a photo of what I'm talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 01:43:51 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
klaas - I noticed you posted Madison Whatley's POV; thanks, that was interesting reading.

Then I noticed that it's on the Natalee index instead of Important Case Documents. ?

Yeah, it's in a couple of places right now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:45:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Klaasend wrote;
Quote

Is Simian talking about Guido?


I personally don't think this refernece was to Guido. But who across the pond might have security footage? I don't think Guido was ever anyone's boyfriend from earlier in the week. JMHO

Well he could have been Joran's boyfriend from earlier in the week  :wink:


Took the words right out of my mouth but I restrained myself---for once. :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 01:48:50 PM
kermit, does have great images.

so does spock.


--------
two new ones, get 'em hot, get 'em fresh.

love the clown wiggy!

----

EUREKA-

DAS FUT!


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/f555.png

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 01:54:00 PM
2NJSons_Mom wrote
Quote
'on the other side of the pond'...HI, Marriott...? Just trying to put testimony, security footage & witnesses into it. Klaas, I get what you are saying...just can't put all the pieces in place.


IMO the other side of the pond means the residential area that sits behind the pond. It might seem strange, but it is certainly something to consider with possible reference to security video even. All the houses have barriers/cement walls around them for security. Many are like inpenetrable forts. Some homes have iron bars on the windows/doors. My point is if some people may have security cameras. Where did JVC live again?

(http://member.telpacific.com.au/rolyroper/NataleeHolloway/photos/marriotbeachaerialh.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 01:58:57 PM
Dis person's DAWGS

ARE SO

> NOT GELLIN'


MRS. MC MELON!



Dr. Scholls should have had a look at these poor piggies. :lol:



Even lookin' at 'em makes me want a good foot rub.

 :shock:


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/RTTR555.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 02:00:09 PM
I see a blue lighter laying on the bottom rim of the right cupholder.  

It would be the right proportion, given that at the top of both cupholders is a cellphone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 02:01:48 PM
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/SSSS.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 02:02:06 PM
Bleached

Early on,  I was told that "the other side of the pond" also could mean acrossed the ocean too.  Its a european phrase?  

I took it to mean those in the netherlands.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on April 10, 2007, 02:15:53 PM
I just contacted Oprah and requested Beth as a speaker.

I stated that Beth is an excellent speaker with an important message about traveling for our young women.

Here’s a direct link:
http://www2.oprah.com/email/reach/email_showideas.jhtml


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 10, 2007, 02:16:12 PM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Bleached

Early on,  I was told that "the other side of the pond" also could mean acrossed the ocean too.  Its a european phrase?  

I took it to mean those in the netherlands.


Maybe across the Caribbean? Or Gulf? I always had the thought that it might be referring to the U.S.

"Across the pond" (or "other side") I think especially means England - U.S.A.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 02:41:17 PM
Ms. Marple

It could mean anywhere I think.  Could be any of the Islands, South America, North America, Europe,  Could be acrossed any ocean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 02:46:14 PM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
I see a blue lighter laying on the bottom rim of the right cupholder.  

It would be the right proportion, given that at the top of both cupholders is a cellphone.



(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a229/msdarthvada/lighter.jpg)

Like this one


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 02:51:05 PM
LaLa's or anybody:

I guess it's safe to assume that the video at the rocks was recorded on June 11, in the early morning hours.  Did we ever find out what day the photos were taken of the bag in the water basin?

Also:  I went to the thread that was posted by Spock and, again, I see
the body of a young woman in the background of the painter.  Can we do
any enlargements on that picture?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 02:52:23 PM
Where did this pic originate from? Not where someone on the this blog has it stored, but the actual location or source it came from and when?
In this one the "fabricated Lee" hasn't been elongated yet. As a matter of fact the staps seen in the doctored photos almost look like tan lines in this photo and it appears she might be standing around the corner of the bar watching the dance floor just as "cammo guy" appears to be doing.
The only oddity I see when I blow it up and play with colors, contrast etc is that perhaps the sideburns of the sitting "cammo guy" are photoshopped in.

After I get an answer to the source and date on this pic I have a few more pics I want to get source and dates on. I am seeing some odd stuff from photo to photo on these "Natalee dancing on the bar" pics.

(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)[/img]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 02:55:15 PM
I need to clarify my question on the photo. I wan to know the source of the right hand side of the photo. The one of the guy sitting at the bar.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 02:59:18 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
I need to clarify my question on the photo. I wan to know the source of the right hand side of the photo. The one of the guy sitting at the bar.

You sample has been adjusted quite a bit, but I'm sure the original was one of those posted by Dan at RWV on July 22, 2005.  They were said to have been received by Dan Riehl from a tourist who just happened to be in Aruba at the same time as NH.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 10, 2007, 02:59:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaasend,

In Photobucket do I choose avatar size in order to get a pic to the correct size to use as an avatar? I know it may be a dumb question, but given what happened on my first picture attempt...................

Yes, that will probably work although I haven't done avatars that way.  Then you need to copy from photobucket the url without the IMG tags and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.  Give it a try and see if it works.  We can always fix it  :wink:


Hi Klaas

Please do not do any fixin' up of my avatar.  I could not bear to part with my "security" ducky.

I hope you had a nice Easter.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:00:08 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
I need to clarify my question on the photo. I wan to know the source of the right hand side of the photo. The one of the guy sitting at the bar.


Hey, Adoronron!

Welcome....

 :smt006


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on April 10, 2007, 03:00:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
OMG!  Fix me!!! I didn't mean to do that, I swear!!  I am so sorry.  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

You didn't do it Lala's, I did when I added the IMG tags to the link you pasted.  I've since copied it and made it a bit smaller and replaced your link.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:01:09 PM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/hiIAMmelvin.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:01:41 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaasend,

In Photobucket do I choose avatar size in order to get a pic to the correct size to use as an avatar? I know it may be a dumb question, but given what happened on my first picture attempt...................

Yes, that will probably work although I haven't done avatars that way.  Then you need to copy from photobucket the url without the IMG tags and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.  Give it a try and see if it works.  We can always fix it  :wink:


Hi Klaas

Please do not do any fixin' up of my avatar.  I could not bear to part with my "security" ducky.

I hope you had a nice Easter.

Janet

I won't mess with you, I know better..ha ha  :lol:

I had a great Easter, hope you did too!  Kindof busy today trying to get my remote access working so I can get back to "real" work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:02:06 PM
LOL

Janet.

>Ducky :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:03:42 PM
Hey Klaas!

Can you do me a favor and post a copy of the picture that was posted
on Spock's thread that shows the painter painting the rocks?  In the
background, lying behind the painter, I see a body.

Can we zoom in on it?

Please.... work your magic!

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:07:40 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Hey Klaas!

Can you do me a favor and post a copy of the picture that was posted
on Spock's thread that shows the painter painting the rocks?  In the
background, lying behind the painter, I see a body.

Can we zoom in on it?

Please.... work your magic!

 :wink:


Patti - this one?

{{removed since it wasn't the one and was blowing the margins}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:07:50 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Hey Klaas!

Can you do me a favor and post a copy of the picture that was posted
on Spock's thread that shows the painter painting the rocks?  In the
background, lying behind the painter, I see a body.

Can we zoom in on it?

Please.... work your magic!

 :wink:


hey patti

I just posted a link to a zoom into it on the FP.

It is absolutely positively a human head...

(it appears to have taken a bullet to left temple)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:09:53 PM
I think she means this one?

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/38superzoom.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:10:57 PM
Carpe,

Do you see the triangular pattern to the stitching on the shoes we are calling barefoot?  Some of the toenails in those last photos of that you posted would have to be perfectly triangular.

And you are the only one who can see me!  I am otherwise invisible, lol!

Did you notice Carnut said something nice to me yesterday?  I am still in total shock about that.   :shock:  :shock:  :shock: And we have only been posting on the same forum for prolly 18 months counting elsewhere.

Thank you, Carnut! As I have readily admitted before, some do not like Barbie but I just enjoy all the possible outfits and endless variety of clothing available for these Net Dolls.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:11:44 PM
Klaas:

No.... but I found that one to be quite interesting because of the carp
that was used to collect the "evidence".

It's the first one... with the painter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:12:44 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Carpe,

Do you see the triangular pattern to the stitching on the shoes we are calling barefoot?  Some of the toenails in those last photos of that you posted would have to be perfectly triangular.

And you are the only one who can see me!  I am otherwise invisible, lol!

Did you notice Carnut said something nice to me yesterday?  I am still in total shock about that.   :shock:  :shock:  :shock: And we have only been posting on the same forum for prolly 18 months counting elsewhere.

Thank you, Carnut! As I have readily admitted before, some do not like Barbie but I just enjoy all the possible outfits and endless variety of clothing available for these Net Dolls.

.

I see you but I wish you'ld stop changing clothes, LOLOL   :lol:  You must have to do laundry every day!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:16:53 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:17:04 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I think she means this one?

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/38superzoom.png


Hey!  Carpe....

That's it.

Can we clean it up?  Or make it any clearer?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:17:48 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Carpe,

Do you see the triangular pattern to the stitching on the shoes we are calling barefoot?  Some of the toenails in those last photos of that you posted would have to be perfectly triangular.

And you are the only one who can see me!  I am otherwise invisible, lol!

Did you notice Carnut said something nice to me yesterday?  I am still in total shock about that.   :shock:  :shock:  :shock: And we have only been posting on the same forum for prolly 18 months counting elsewhere.

Thank you, Carnut! As I have readily admitted before, some do not like Barbie but I just enjoy all the possible outfits and endless variety of clothing available for these Net Dolls.

.


hey
Anna,

While you were gone I imaged some more on the #24 foot.

See what you think after viewing these three.


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/RTTR555.png


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/f555.png



http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 03:18:44 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/SSSS.png


I think it was you last night that said the image/reflection in the picture looked like vancromviort? I agree with that. He has sure kept a low profile despite his son's likely involvement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:19:34 PM
Across the pond...that would most likely mean the Netherlands.  By this time Simian was assuming that the evidence that had been sent to the Hague was safe and secure.  We know that is not likely at this point.  


The head...discussed several times.  I think with Tylergal. Never formed a definite conclusion.  One question would be...why would the Aru Bay originator want to help the SG at this point if he/she/it were in collusion with the  Chamber of Commerce?   Just more questions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:19:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[I see you but I wish you'ld stop changing clothes, LOLOL   :lol:  You must have to do laundry every day!  :lol:



Hey, I don't ask you to do it for me, LOL!  Think what a job that would be!  So there is that to be thankful about.  Just remember I'm the only Barbie regardless of clothing.  The muffs yesterday were for Lalas and today I am wearing my Uggs made in Australia, the shoes for anyone interested who doesn't know what Uggs are.  Thought Tibro would get a kick out of Barbies wearing Uggs.

In RL, I average three loads of laundry daily but some is brought home from college and lots of it for the dogs.

I can't imagine life without the washer or dryer one running!


Oh, I am not even going to start on those photos because I see dogs in them!!    Two dog heads in the last one carpe posted the link to.  These photos just are not my forte I guess, will leave them to carpe and others who see them better.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:21:49 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1.png)


Yep!  That's it, Klaas!

You see the body that is in the background?  

Carpe has posted a link to an enlargement and I've asked him if
he can make it look clearer.  

Doesn't Natalee have a birthmark or something on one of her shoulders?
I'm just wondering if we can find out one way or the other if this is Natalee....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 03:21:50 PM
RE:  The pics of the foot - could the foot be kinda turned up, like taking a step and the light spots not be toenails, but just reflection from the tips of the toes, being the tips would be lighter in color?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:25:07 PM
Patti or Carpe - where are you guys seeing a body in that picture.  Carpe, can you take the large picture and circle where you see the body?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:25:13 PM
Someone show me the head, please. I can't see it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:25:24 PM
See the brown dog to the right of the red cooler with the bloody streak on its back?  It is in the rocks with head upwards.

. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:25:45 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
RE:  The pics of the foot - could the foot be kinda turned up, like taking a step and the light spots not be toenails, but just reflection from the tips of the toes, being the tips would be lighter in color?


Could be.  I find it hard to believe it's bare feet but I could certainly be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:25:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Someone show me the head, please. I can't see it.


I mean the body...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:27:14 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
See the brown dog to the right of the red cooler with the bloody streak on its back?  It is in the rocks with head upwards.

. :(


Dog? I don't see no dog! What video number is it?  I may just watch it instead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:27:21 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/gfffffff5656.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:28:35 PM
If you can't see that... an arrow ain't gonna help.  j/k:D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:28:45 PM
Carpe,
Yes, those are the photos of the barefoot that show perfect triangles where the toenails should be.  I think stitching of contrasting color to attach top of shoe to bottom.  Shoe is dark brown or black with stitching white or cream colored.

Do you see the triangles or am I imagining things again?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 03:29:45 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Someone show me the head, please. I can't see it.


I could make a dirty comment here , but as I see you are still writing, and I already blew the margins 1X , I won't say it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:30:24 PM
I don't see a brown dog anywhere in the shot with the cooler at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:31:33 PM
Sorry guys but I'm not seeing a body.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:32:13 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Anna"
See the brown dog to the right of the red cooler with the bloody streak on its back?  It is in the rocks with head upwards.

. :(


Dog? I don't see no dog! What video number is it?  I may just watch it instead.


That's because it probably isn't there but in the photo Klaas just posted, look at the red cooler, water container and go to the right until you see a red smudge in the rocks.  That would be the middle of the dog's back.  The head it up with ears out and you can't see the back legs, they are behind the rocks.

I think like clouds, we all see things most familiar to us perhaps.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:32:45 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
If you can't see that... an arrow ain't gonna help.  j/k:D


Carpe:

You see how her ankles look like they have something tied around them...
can you focus in on them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:32:50 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Someone show me the head, please. I can't see it.


I could make a dirty comment here , but as I see you are still writing, and I already blew the margins 1X , I won't say it.


Hey Wild Hair!  You better behave today.  I have newly sharpened pencils...I stole Tibros last night.  


What video number would that be, please.  Notice I said please... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:32:53 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 03:33:13 PM
Here are a few of Spocks pics. Unfortunately I don't see any of the things he is highlighting. :cry:

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h302/BeamMeUp_photos/pointtoobject2-1.png)

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h302/BeamMeUp_photos/TurnedObjectforPhotograph-1.png)

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h302/BeamMeUp_photos/touchcliped.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 10, 2007, 03:33:56 PM
I am new,so be a little patient,please.As a mother,I would do everything Beth

has done and maybe more.I wonder about the security people.I heard they
 
used the in room cameras to take pictures of women.I think they maybe

the 5 family as Simian talked about.I know I am just guessing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 03:34:13 PM
(http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8811/arubayvideo8comparison5gu.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:34:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Sorry guys but I'm not seeing a body.


Carpe:

Sweetie, please draw a circle around the body in the large picture that
includes the painter....

Thanks in Advance

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:34:39 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I don't see a brown dog anywhere in the shot with the cooler at all.


In the videos there are two dogs at the rocks.  I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:35:14 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Someone show me the head, please. I can't see it.


I could make a dirty comment here , but as I see you are still writing, and I already blew the margins 1X , I won't say it.


Hey Wild Hair!  You better behave today.  I have newly sharpened pencils...I stole Tibros last night.  


What video number would that be, please.  Notice I said please... :roll:


Chicago video 38

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5494456272885185570&q=Chicago_510_38


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:35:52 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I am new,so be a little patient,please.As a mother,I would do everything Beth

has done and maybe more.I wonder about the security people.I heard they
 
used the in room cameras to take pictures of women.I think they maybe

the 5 family as Simian talked about.I know I am just guessing.


Do you read Shango and Simian?  Good for you! Now, please repeat what you just said.  My southern didn't translate too well. Sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:36:39 PM
Thanks Klaas...I see you pulling your hair out over there. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 03:36:45 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I am new,so be a little patient,please.As a mother,I would do everything Beth

has done and maybe more.I wonder about the security people.I heard they
 
used the in room cameras to take pictures of women.I think they maybe

the 5 family as Simian talked about.I know I am just guessing.


Tiger - Hi

The security people at what hotel?  The HI?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:37:26 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I am new,so be a little patient,please.As a mother,I would do everything Beth

has done and maybe more.I wonder about the security people.I heard they
 
used the in room cameras to take pictures of women.I think they maybe

the 5 family as Simian talked about.I know I am just guessing.

Welcome Tiger.

Jump right in and ask questions we are patient.  Look at Lala's she asks questions. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 03:39:04 PM
OT....ANS case about to name if LB is father of baby...on FOX


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:39:38 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I am new,so be a little patient,please.As a mother,I would do everything Beth

has done and maybe more.I wonder about the security people.I heard they
 
used the in room cameras to take pictures of women.I think they maybe

the 5 family as Simian talked about.I know I am just guessing.



Welcome, Tiger!

I have always wondered if someone, possibly with use of the security company's equipment, had vids or photos of lots of very high ranking officials thus insuring the punks would never be prosecuted.  Taken in the various hotels where they are responsible for security.  

Sort of a get out of jail free card.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:40:00 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
OT....ANS case about to name if LB is father of baby...on FOX

Thank Mere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:41:11 PM
If they say Howard is the father I smell something fishy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:41:17 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Klaas:

If you look behind the painter and on the ground, this is the body that
you will see.

What I want Carpe to do is try to enlarge specific areas.

First the Ankles

Then the shoulders

Then try to get a better picture of the head area


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:41:32 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/fdffdfdfdd.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:42:06 PM
sorry klaas, I was hoping not to blow the margin.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 03:42:23 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
OT....ANS case about to name if LB is father of baby...on FOX


Sure hope it's not that crazy prince!!   :shock:

Back to work. . . . .have laundry you would not believe to do!   :D  :D  :D
Must be all the Barbie clothes!  Good thing one load will hold a whole season of outfits.   :lol:  8)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 03:43:00 PM
Howdy Tiger . All thoughts are good ones. Somewhere out there answers exist. The more information we turn over, possibly something previously missed will become apparent.

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h302/BeamMeUp_photos/stain10.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:43:36 PM
Patti,

I don't see shoulders anywhere in the pic. I just see head, and
body parts. Arms, legs, feet, and head. No torso.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 03:44:16 PM
Quote from: "San"
If they say Howard is the father I smell something fishy.


Has there been an announcement about the DNA test?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 03:45:40 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Patti,

I don't see shoulders anywhere in the pic. I just see head, and
body parts. Arms, legs, feet, and head. No torso.


I wish my eyes were as good as yours.  :(

I see a gray blob, with a red blob to the left of it and a black blob behind it.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:46:23 PM
I watched...I didn't see any dogs or body.  Are you sure that's the right video?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 03:46:33 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "San"
If they say Howard is the father I smell something fishy.


Has there been an announcement about the DNA test?


Not yet BB.....they are waiting for the group to come out of the courthouse....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:47:07 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Patti,

I don't see shoulders anywhere in the pic. I just see head, and
body parts. Arms, legs, feet, and head. No torso.


I wish my eyes were as good as yours.  :(

I see a gray blob, with a red blob to the left of it and a black blob behind it.  :oops:

So basically you see blobs :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:47:36 PM
Larry Birkhead is the father.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 03:47:39 PM
LB is the father


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 03:48:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Patti,

I don't see shoulders anywhere in the pic. I just see head, and
body parts. Arms, legs, feet, and head. No torso.


I wish my eyes were as good as yours.  :(

I see a gray blob, with a red blob to the left of it and a black blob behind it.  :oops:

So basically you see blobs :lol:


That might be my problem with the whole world - it's all nothing but blobs.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:49:11 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Patti,

I don't see shoulders anywhere in the pic. I just see head, and
body parts. Arms, legs, feet, and head. No torso.


I wish my eyes were as good as yours.  :(

I see a gray blob, with a red blob to the left of it and a black blob behind it.  :oops:



Don't feel bad. My eyes get crossed too!!! I was working on a
shot of a cop's legs last night. I was in so close, that when I picked
up where I left off today... my eyes were crossed, all I could
see were blobs of color for 5 minutes... until finally my brain
my sense of it... and I got back "in the zone" as they say.
8)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:50:11 PM
Know what makes me sick is that HKS knew he wasn't the father and he was holding this baby hostage.  JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:50:16 PM
I always have questions...that is why you guys are so good.  Lots of practice.  

The video that Klaas linked for me was the one with the grey car with two people in it.  Last night I saw the "grey driver" pic on Carpe's site.  That was very good work Carpe.   Now, show me the body. I just see blobs.  They are blown up too much for me. Help!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 03:50:56 PM
Quote from: "San"
Larry Birkhead is the father.


Knew it!  Knew it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:51:30 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/fdffdfdfdd.png)


Carpe:

Those are amputated legs that were found on the rocks....  

Back to the body that is lying on the ground.  It looks like she may have
ropes tied around her ankles... can we get a close up of HER feet?

I'm sure you are trying to tell me something, but I don't think that I am
ready for that....  can we just take a closer look at the body lying on the ground and try to find out if it is Natalee?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 03:57:50 PM
Patti,

That's what I'm saying, you were looking at a close up
at her feet.

Here, I will pull back out and do the global overview.

I will label all as I see it.

Here we go:

(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sstain1DD.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 03:58:24 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Klaas:

If you look behind the painter and on the ground, this is the body that
you will see.

What I want Carpe to do is try to enlarge specific areas.

First the Ankles

Then the shoulders

Then try to get a better picture of the head area


Okay... I'll tell you what I see.

I see a woman lying on her belly.  Her left arm bent upward, her right arm is amputated and is pointing downward.  She has a lot of blood on her left side of her back, the blood is dripping down and forming a pool
along the edge of the white towel that someone has placed over her
buttocks.  Her left leg is bent outward and her ankles either have ropes
tied around them or have blood stains from where she had fought with
restraints.

Her head is entact.

Does anyone else see that?!?!?!??!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 03:58:33 PM
Howard looks terrible :lol: .  

He said he would like to be a gradual transition period for the baby so no harm would come to her.  No harm!!!!!!!!! :shock:   Get that baby away from Howard as fast as they can before he does harm.

They are saying Howard could be in big trouble now and he better get a lawyer.  Greta said if she was his lawyer she would sit him down and say tell me the truth now so I can protect you.  There is a judge on the show also and he said Greta is absolutely right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:02:30 PM
Lalas,

I don't see a full body in this shot. See the global pic
I just put up one or two posts above.

Strictly heads and body parts, I have circled and labeled everything
as I see it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 04:03:22 PM
Did anyone see the newest registered users name :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 04:03:23 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Klaas:

If you look behind the painter and on the ground, this is the body that
you will see.

What I want Carpe to do is try to enlarge specific areas.

First the Ankles

Then the shoulders

Then try to get a better picture of the head area


Okay... I'll tell you what I see.

I see a woman lying on her belly.  Her left arm bent upward, her right arm is amputated and is pointing downward.  She has a lot of blood on her left side of her back, the blood is dripping down and forming a pool
along the edge of the white towel that someone has placed over her
buttocks.  Her left leg is bent outward and her ankles either have ropes
tied around them or have blood stains from where she had fought with
restraints.

Her head is entact.

Does anyone else see that?!?!?!??!?


No actually, the blood is on the white towel, or whatever it is that is covering her buttocks area.

Carpe:

If you look at the pictures of the body that were posted by Spock... you will find another one of those white spots on the thing that I am calling a towel.  Do you think it might actually be her shirt that has been wrapped around her waist?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 04:06:00 PM
Earth to Klaas:

Do you see it now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 04:09:47 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Earth to Klaas:

Do you see it now?


Patti - I'm busy with some "real life" work right now and can't really study it carefully.  At first glance no.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 04:10:57 PM
Biological fatherhood does not a father make. LB did not plan on being a father, and at this point I would question his motives also, with such a large amount of money possibly involved. Fergie is a big zero. The best thing is that the baby is as young as she is.......sad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:13:32 PM
It gets frustrating when you see it from your point of
view, and ya try and try to "splain" it as Ricky Ricardo
would say...

yet other people do no quite see it from the same angle.

BELIEVE ME, PATTI... I can relate. :)

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 04:14:08 PM
Quote from: Patti
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Klaas:

If you look behind the painter and on the ground, this is the body that
you will see.

What I want Carpe to do is try to enlarge specific areas.

First the Ankles

Then the shoulders

Then try to get a better picture of the head area


Okay... I'll tell you what I see.

I see a woman lying on her belly.  Her left arm bent upward, her right arm is amputated and is pointing downward.  She has a lot of blood on her left side of her back, the blood is dripping down and forming a pool
along the edge of the white towel that someone has placed over her
buttocks.  Her left leg is bent outward and her ankles either have ropes
tied around them or have blood stains from where she had fought with
restraints.

Her head is entact.

Does anyone else see that?!?!?!??!?

No actually, the blood is on the white towel, or whatever it is that is covering her buttocks area.


Patti I don't see it either. But there was reportedly a 5 or 7 year old childs body found at the site. Maybe there is something of that you are seeing?...the recovery?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 04:15:48 PM
This is a curious photo. I can't imnagine what they are doing here. Photo courtesy of Spock at BFN.

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h302/BeamMeUp_photos/Rock%20set/flip0.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 04:16:31 PM
Where's that spell checker when I need it? :evil:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:18:45 PM
LOL... BB > spell check


--------

Hey, for the record... if the following pic is a moccasin...

I'm WAYNE FRIGGIN' NEWSTON. ROFL!!
:lol:  :lol:

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 04:19:59 PM
Quote from: bleachedblack
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Klaas:

If you look behind the painter and on the ground, this is the body that
you will see.

What I want Carpe to do is try to enlarge specific areas.

First the Ankles

Then the shoulders

Then try to get a better picture of the head area


Okay... I'll tell you what I see.

I see a woman lying on her belly.  Her left arm bent upward, her right arm is amputated and is pointing downward.  She has a lot of blood on her left side of her back, the blood is dripping down and forming a pool
along the edge of the white towel that someone has placed over her
buttocks.  Her left leg is bent outward and her ankles either have ropes
tied around them or have blood stains from where she had fought with
restraints.

Her head is entact.

Does anyone else see that?!?!?!??!?

No actually, the blood is on the white towel, or whatever it is that is covering her buttocks area.


Patti I don't see it either. But there was reportedly a 5 or 7 year old childs body found at the site. Maybe there is something of that you are seeing?...the recovery?


Bleached Black:

Does it help if I tell you that the X that Carpe marked on the picture is the
point at which her left knee is bent?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:20:46 PM
4

BLEACHED BLACK



http://www.texavery.com/sounds/babes.wav


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 04:23:19 PM
Bleached Black,

There is another one of those face relections in that photo. It's takes up the entire upper right quadrant of the photo. Does anyone else see it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:23:19 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
4

BLEACHED BLACK



http://www.texavery.com/sounds/babes.wav


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



DON'T CLICK ON THAT ... INSTEAD COPY AND PASTE

IT INTO YOUR BROWSER & HIT GO. It won't link for some reason.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 04:25:49 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Bleached Black,

There is another one of those face relections in that photo. It's takes up the entire upper right quadrant of the photo. Does anyone else see it?


I see it.... but then, I see everything!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:26:35 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Bleached Black,

There is another one of those face relections in that photo. It's takes up the entire upper right quadrant of the photo. Does anyone else see it?


adoronron,


I see something, ever so faint. Surely not as prominent as the
one we imaged yesterday... with the nose, chin, and eyes...


but I think I do detect something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 10, 2007, 04:27:46 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Bleached Black,

There is another one of those face relections in that photo. It's takes up the entire upper right quadrant of the photo. Does anyone else see it?


I see it.... but then, I see everything!!!!


And I don't see ANYTHING!   Waaahhhhh.  I try and I try.**slinking off in the corner to pout**


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 04:28:03 PM
Since we are really looking at the rocks again, do any of you remember the man who walked away from the scene and looked like he got nauseated....he was a big man, wearing dark pants and white shirt....it was at that point that I felt he was looking at human remains.  It is just
one of those loose ends from months ago....TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:28:49 PM
Quote from: carpe noctem
LOL... BB > spell check


--------

Hey, for the record... if the following pic is a moccasin...

I'm WAYNE FRIGGIN' NEWSTON. ROFL!!
:lol:  :lol:

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png[/quote


I meant NEWTON.


You know like Fig NEWSTONS! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:31:40 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Since we are really looking at the rocks again, do any of you remember the man who walked away from the scene and looked like he got nauseated....he was a big man, wearing dark pants and white shirt....it was at that point that I felt he was looking at human remains.  It is just
one of those loose ends from months ago....TIA



Yup, I do Memere.

I am pretty sure that is on 5, 7 and 8. ARUBAY.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Carnut on April 10, 2007, 04:31:41 PM
Yup, I see the face.

(http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/images/cydonia/pio_med.gif) (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 04:33:36 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Yup, I see the face.

(http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/images/cydonia/pio_med.gif) (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm)


LOL

Carnut! :D



-------

Natalee Computer Wallpaper

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/J4Nwallpaper21g.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 04:34:56 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
LOL... BB > spell check


--------

Hey, for the record... if the following pic is a moccasin...

I'm WAYNE FRIGGIN' NEWSTON. ROFL!!
:lol:  :lol:

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png



Should I call you Wayne or Newston?  Or Friggin maybe?  If that is a foot, why are the toenails in between the toes?  Note the "toes" extend to the edge of the shoe and the "toenails" appear to be between each "toe" with at least two of the toenails being perfect triangles and even those pointing in the wrong direction to be triangular toenails.

That is a shoe and not a foot.   :wink:

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 04:35:41 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Bleached Black,

There is another one of those face relections in that photo. It's takes up the entire upper right quadrant of the photo. Does anyone else see it?


I see it.... but then, I see everything!!!!


And I don't see ANYTHING!   Waaahhhhh.  I try and I try.**slinking off in the corner to pout**


Kimmy.... don't feel bad.  It's gross anyway.

You might try adjusting your contrast.... I have mine turned up all the way.  And on those dark shots, like the ones of the bag, I turn my brightness up all the way... that helps.

It is even more frustrating when you see something that is so clear to you
and no one else sees it.  I know Carpe knows what I'm talking about because , how else would he have known which link to send me to... it's there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 04:35:50 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
4

BLEACHED BLACK



http://www.texavery.com/sounds/babes.wav


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



DON'T CLICK ON THAT ... INSTEAD COPY AND PASTE

IT INTO YOUR BROWSER & HIT GO. It won't link for some reason.


Carpe You are a hoot!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 10, 2007, 04:39:14 PM
I feel the security family,Van Cromfelts are the missing link.Money,Means

 and Reasons.The son in the family was arrested and is the frug maker,I

heard.I feel that Dutch families are in for the money.Money talks.The others

are also for the money.A trial my have netted Joran 6 months in jail,and we

wouldn't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 04:39:46 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
LOL... BB > spell check


--------

Hey, for the record... if the following pic is a moccasin...

I'm WAYNE FRIGGIN' NEWSTON. ROFL!!
:lol:  :lol:

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png



Should I call you Wayne or Newston?  Or Friggin maybe?  If that is a foot, why are the toenails in between the toes?  Note the "toes" extend to the edge of the shoe and the "toenails" appear to be between each "toe" with at least two of the toenails being perfect triangles and even those pointing in the wrong direction to be triangular toenails.

That is a shoe and not a foot.   :wink:

 :wink:




AND it's even a clog.  If you look back near the cuff of the pant leg, you see the dark brown shoe end and a black or navy blue sock!

. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 04:41:53 PM
Patti wrote;
Quote
Bleached Black:

Does it help if I tell you that the X that Carpe marked on the picture is the
point at which her left knee is bent?


I wish it helped, thank-you for trying. But I still don't see any human features
as far as a forensic recovery. I do see in a couple of the pics what looks to be a human reflection in the pic, but can't be sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: MsVada on April 10, 2007, 04:44:53 PM
I don't see it either,  although in the picture you mention a shark,  I saw what could be the shark.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 04:48:04 PM
The resolution is just too poor in these photos to make out much of anything especially in the background.  I have even tried making res higher on my monitor and more/less color.

Still just blobs.   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 04:48:32 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Yup, I see the face.

(http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/images/cydonia/pio_med.gif) (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm)
 

...and I see a 1940 Ford sedan...!   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 04:49:51 PM
Carpe,
What are your monitor settings?  Maybe that's the ticket?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 04:56:07 PM
As far as the assumption that there might be a shark in the one of the rock site photos.........sorta makes one wonder about the statement "she wanted to go see the sharks".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 05:07:51 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Yup, I see the face.

(http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/images/cydonia/pio_med.gif) (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm)
 

...and I see a 1940 Ford sedan...!   :D

Looks like Joran's face with all those zits.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 05:15:50 PM
Anna is right!  It is a clog.  I see what she is saying.  The person is wearing clogs.  It could very well be Yolanda.  

Carpe
You are now Wane Friggin Newston!!! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 05:16:16 PM
Heck! Now I can't spell either!  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 10, 2007, 05:37:24 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Patti wrote;
Quote
Bleached Black:

Does it help if I tell you that the X that Carpe marked on the picture is the
point at which her left knee is bent?


I wish it helped, thank-you for trying. But I still don't see any human features
as far as a forensic recovery. I do see in a couple of the pics what looks to be a human reflection in the pic, but can't be sure.


 :lol:

Bleached Black, I sincerely have tried and tried and tried to comprehend what so many claim to see so clearly.  However ... the image of a body remains elusive.

Also, logic dictates if the "powers that be" in Aruba were attempting to protect their own by covering up what happened to Natalee Holloway .... why would all this action at the rocks be done in daylight hours ... for the world to observe ... for the world to videotape?

One day prior to the activity at the rocks ... on June 10, 2005 ... there was a reported admission by one of the main suspects.  Could it be that all this activity at the rocks was related to that admission?  Could it be that Aruba was going through the motions of an investigation for the sake of public relations while knowing darn well that Natalee Holloway was no longer there?  Could it be that unknown to the suspects Natalee had been moved from where she had first been placed?  Could that Natalee had been moved by "somebody close to the young suspects"?

Janet


Gerold Dompig
ASSOCIATED PRESS - June 12/05
Deputy Police Commissioner, Gerold Dompig, told The Associated Press that one of three young men arrested in the case admitted "something bad Happened" to Holloway and was leading police to the scene. Prosecutors refused to comment on Dompig's statement, and Dompig himself refused to identify which of the three young men who took Holloway to the Northern beach the night she went missing made the statement.

Aruban Minister of Justice Spokesperson
FOX NEW - June 11, 2005
David Cruz, a spokesman for the Aruban Minister of Justice (search) told FOX News Natalee Holloway (search), who was on vacation with friends with a graduation trip when she disappeared, was confirmed dead and that authorities knew the location of her body. However, Cruz later retracted the statement, saying he was a victim of a "misinformation campaign."

Gerold Dompig
48 HOURS - Mar. 22/06
Dompig says he believes Paulus Van der Sloot does know more than he has been telling about the circumstances surrounding Holloway's disappearance.

Gerold Dompig
48 HOURS - Mar. 22/06
The Aruban authorities’ new theory is that someone, someone possibly very close to the young suspects, took the time to carefully hide the body, not once but maybe twice, literally re-burying her.

Gerold Dompig
48 HOURS - Mar. 22/06
Dompig speculates the body was hastily buried once, and that extra accomplices may have been needed to move it to a more hidden location


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 05:47:56 PM
Anna,

I love you, my dear. You are super smart, and I respect all
of your opinions.

PLUS,


I think your Barbie outfits are pretty friggin
boss!!!

...but I can't budge on that one, my brain and eyes tell me 'barefoot.'


I respectfully disagree. :wink:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/th1130423226iLoveYou.gif)


(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/farley.gif)


The mystery stuff in between the toes, they had it imported,

 it is called DIRT!


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/errrrrrrrf.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 05:51:48 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Anna,

I love you, my dear. You are super smart, and I respect all
of your opinions.

PLUS,


I think your Barbie outfits are pretty friggin
boss!!!

...but I can't budge on that one, my brain and eyes tell me 'barefoot.'


I respectfully disagree. :wink:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/th1130423226iLoveYou.gif)


(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/farley.gif)


The mystery stuff in between the toes, they had it imported,

 it is called DIRT!


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/errrrrrrrf.png



Wayne...I mean Carpe...it's a shoe sweetie.  Even I can see it and that means something.  It's a shoe.  Look closer.  Anna is right.  Trust me on this one.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 05:54:17 PM
Hello Monkeys.

What a busy cage today.  There will be lots of cleaning to do tonight.  Think I will need a hazard suit with all the body bits around.

Welcome to our new posters, Adoronron and Tiger.  I may seem to be logging in late to you but I am still a day ahead of you all!!!

Anna - love the Uggies!  Soon be time to wear them here too.

In reference to the feet or moccasins, I remember a shot showing inside the car and it clearly showed moccasins with stitching in a pattern at the toes.
Also could the second person be connected to the security guards such as a family member?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 05:54:49 PM
The white "toes" are stitching on the clogs or sandals or whatever type shoe they are. The person is wearing dark blue socks also.  I don't understand why these people wear sock on Aruba. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 05:56:30 PM
Janet - PRECISELY.

Also, logic dictates if the "powers that be" in Aruba were attempting to protect their own by covering up what happened to Natalee Holloway .... why would all this action at the rocks be done in daylight hours ... for the world to observe ... for the world to videotape?



There WERE ABSOLUTELY body parts at the rocks. What we are looking at in the ARUBAY TAPES are not Natalee's remains, I don't think. I thought
so for the longest, but not anymore.

Not at the ROCKS anyway.


GREAT OBSERVATION, Janet.

Why would they be cleaning at rocks with body parts out in the
open during daylight hours. Acting like nothing is wrong.


IT WAS A DIVERSION. It was done on purpose, I believe.

You know how rubber-neckers stop to look at a car accident.

That is precisely what the dirty ones in the ALE wanted, while
some were off getting the REAL WORK OF THE DAY DONE...
and doing it clandestinely. imo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 05:58:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Anna,

I love you, my dear. You are super smart, and I respect all
of your opinions.

PLUS,


I think your Barbie outfits are pretty friggin
boss!!!

...but I can't budge on that one, my brain and eyes tell me 'barefoot.'


I respectfully disagree. :wink:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/th1130423226iLoveYou.gif)


(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/farley.gif)


The mystery stuff in between the toes, they had it imported,

 it is called DIRT!


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/errrrrrrrf.png



Wayne...I mean Carpe...it's a shoe sweetie.  Even I can see it and that means something.  It's a shoe.  Look closer.  Anna is right.  Trust me on this one.  :wink:



Shoes do not have long toes with space in between them, and toe nails.


>>> BAREFOOT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Marlee on April 10, 2007, 05:59:53 PM
Carpe---Last week when the topic was the photoshopped bar scenes I clicked one of your Photobucket links.  While I was browsing in there I saw a pic of Natalee's hand with the band on her wrist.It is a pic of the bag in the basin.  I remember being shocked when I saw that pic because it was clearly that.  I hurried and clicked out because honestly it made me sad.  It made it too real.

I have been looking for that pic for hours today and I finally found it.  I don't think you have posted it since this subject has come up.  What do I need to tell you so that you can get it and post it?

I really hope you guys see what I see in this pic.  It is actually the clearest I have ever seen anything while we have been looking for stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 06:01:22 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/f555.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 06:04:06 PM
Quote from: "Marlee"
Carpe---Last week when the topic was the photoshopped bar scenes I clicked one of your Photobucket links.  While I was browsing in there I saw a pic of Natalee's hand with the band on her wrist.It is a pic of the bag in the basin.  I remember being shocked when I saw that pic because it was clearly that.  I hurried and clicked out because honestly it made me sad.  It made it too real.

I have been looking for that pic for hours today and I finally found it.  I don't think you have posted it since this subject has come up.  What do I need to tell you so that you can get it and post it?

I really hope you guys see what I see in this pic.  It is actually the clearest I have ever seen anything while we have been looking for stuff.




Thank you for asking, Marlee.


I will get the hand pics that I mailed to Mr. Holloway earlier today.  BRB -- just a sec


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 06:05:54 PM
IT SHOULD BE IN THIS BATCH OF PICS



http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ertetertyryrtyr-1.png

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ertetertyryrtyr.png

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dffddfddfd.png

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/GFHFHF.png

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/fdddddddd-1.png


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 10, 2007, 06:06:54 PM
Tamikosmom wrote;
Quote
Could it be that unknown to the suspects Natalee had been moved from where she had first been placed? Could that Natalee had been moved by "somebody close to the young suspects"?


Anything is possible with regards to that rock search/recovery. Maybe they actually found another person and jumped the gun?.....thought it was Natalee. Maybe they found nothing but thought their "busy work" would keep media eyes focused there? ALE was always searching the lighthouse area. If Natalee had been moved from one place to another , I doubt the perp  would place her there, in the rocks . There are these "dingo's" , homeless wandering dogs all over aruba that would surely have scattered what remains are there. Or perhaps the dingo's may have dragged remains to that place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Marlee on April 10, 2007, 06:07:52 PM
Yep that is what I was talking about....It makes me want to cry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 06:11:57 PM
ME TOO. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 06:13:03 PM
Quote from: "Marlee"
Yep that is what I was talking about....It makes me want to cry.


Hi Marlee.
Yes that is the one that I find the most poignant.  Then it makes you angry that we cannot get answers so Natalee's family can get some resolution to all this.  I cannot imagine what they are still going through every day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 06:15:55 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Tamikosmom wrote;
Quote
Could it be that unknown to the suspects Natalee had been moved from where she had first been placed? Could that Natalee had been moved by "somebody close to the young suspects"?


Anything is possible with regards to that rock search/recovery. Maybe they actually found another person and jumped the gun?.....thought it was Natalee. Maybe they found nothing but thought their "busy work" would keep media eyes focused there? ALE was always searching the lighthouse area. If Natalee had been moved from one place to another , I doubt the perp  would place her there, in the rocks . There are these "dingo's" , homeless wandering dogs all over aruba that would surely have scattered what remains are there. Or perhaps the dingo's may have dragged remains to that place.


Hi bb - how far are the gravesites that were vandalised from the lighthouse area?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 06:20:42 PM
For those monkeys that are having difficulty seeing the reflection in the car windscreen, I was having trouble with that yesterday.  Sitting here staring at my computer screen and then the doorbell went.  Went to answer that and on way back just looked at screen and the reflection was there as clear as if it were a picture.  Must have just caught it in the right light and angle.

Also I have a spell checker on this - no idea where it came from but all my different spelling gets highlighted all the time - where I include "u" and "s for z" etc  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 06:21:35 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/f555.png)

After looking at this photo for the past two days the only thing I see is a person walking barefoot and they have five toes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Marlee on April 10, 2007, 06:21:48 PM
Have you ever posted those before?

Is this this first time you have sent them to Dave?


Hi Tib!
I cannot, cannot, cannot imagine what they are going through.  While I have always felt sad about this, after I saw those pictures last week I just have felt the saddest ever. Those ARE the most poignant pics I have seen to date.  I am so sorry Natalee :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 06:22:17 PM
Carpe,

Might you know where the right hand side of this photo came from? Klaas seemed to think it was from Reihl World, but I can't find it there. Or, does anyone here know about when it first showed up in this blog?
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
These other two both originated at Reihl World. The tall narrow one on July 22 2005 and the other on March23 2006. I'm very interested in these becasue all three have been manipulated. The most blatant manipulations are in the March 23 2006 photo that "the tourist time stamped at 12:14:57".
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/121451.jpg)
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/possibly_lee_b_1.jpg)

Thanks,
Ado


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: sb on April 10, 2007, 06:28:01 PM
Welcome adoronron to the Cage!

You may not like me too much.  :wink:  Friends?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 06:34:19 PM
Hi sb,  

That's not Gator as in Florida Gator football and basketball is it? We've had an overdose of that here in central Ohio. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 06:35:37 PM
adoronron - to my knowledge Dan Riehl is the one who originally posted all the photos but what happened after that is anyones guess.  Only a couple of the photos are still on his site, he took some of them down.  He supposidly received 20 some odd photos from the tourist.
The photos were originally posted on July 22, 2005 at RWV but many have been altered since then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 06:41:15 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/f555.png)


I love Lala's and Anna to pieces, but I have to say that this photo looks to me as if it's the bare foot of a dark-skinned person.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 06:43:10 PM
Quote from: "Marlee"
Have you ever posted those before?

Is this this first time you have sent them to Dave?


Hi Tib!
I cannot, cannot, cannot imagine what they are going through.  While I have always felt sad about this, after I saw those pictures last week I just have felt the saddest ever. Those ARE the most poignant pics I have seen to date.  I am so sorry Natalee :cry:



The HAND series I just did that you are referring to is new...

...about 2-3 weeks old. I post them anywhere and everywhere I
can, in hopes of getting others to see it too. I know that is not
just gonna happen overnight. So I try to just keep working
the pics & be patient... people see it when they see it... it takes
time like that...

I have seen hands all along, but never her right one, with the
the light and focus just so...

>to where I could clearly see the
bracelet.

Also, the shape of her fingers and arm look proportional
and correct as well.

I just found a way to take the old photos, and tune them up
to showcase them the best way possible.  FINGERS CROSSED
EVERYONE WILL ONE DAY SEE IT TOO ONE DAY. Justice 4 Natalee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: sb on April 10, 2007, 06:43:26 PM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Bleached

Early on,  I was told that "the other side of the pond" also could mean acrossed the ocean too.  Its a european phrase?  

I took it to mean those in the netherlands.


This is VERY likely. It it almost always used as a slang phrase for "across the Atlantic"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 06:45:20 PM
re: Dave - yes, today was the first.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: sb on April 10, 2007, 06:46:09 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Hi sb,  

That's not Gator as in Florida Gator football and basketball is it? We've had an overdose of that here in central Ohio. :cry:


I'll be nice... promise!  :wink:

We're on the SAME team when it comes to Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 06:49:07 PM
Klaas,

Thanks for the reply.

Two of the photo's that I have I got directly from Dan's site. It's just that particular one that I am still trying to find the source of. Perhaps it's one of the many that Dan removed.
It concerns me that in a situation as serious as this, someone fed Dan and others manipulated photo's for public viewing. I'm not going to stop on this until I'm satisfied I have as much info on these as I can find.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 07:08:04 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaas,

Thanks for the reply.

Two of the photo's that I have I got directly from Dan's site. It's just that particular one that I am still trying to find the source of. Perhaps it's one of the many that Dan removed.
It concerns me that in a situation as serious as this, someone fed Dan and others manipulated photo's for public viewing. I'm not going to stop on this until I'm satisfied I have as much info on these as I can find.


I agree, that is my concern as well.  Even the narrow photo that remains on RWV today is the same manipulated one.  So why would it be necessary to send manipulated photos to Dan in July 2005.  At that time the Aruban's and Joran supporters were doing everything they could to paint Natalee in a bad light.  I think they thought by showing a photo of her possibly dancing on the bar at CnC, we would believe she was other than a nice girl.  They were wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 07:09:15 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Carpe,

Might you know where the right hand side of this photo came from? Klaas seemed to think it was from Reihl World, but I can't find it there. Or, does anyone here know about when it first showed up in this blog?
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
These other two both originated at Reihl World. The tall narrow one on July 22 2005 and the other on March23 2006. I'm very interested in these becasue all three have been manipulated. The most blatant manipulations are in the March 23 2006 photo that "the tourist time stamped at 12:14:57".
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/121451.jpg)
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/possibly_lee_b_1.jpg)

Thanks,
Ado



Hi Ado,,


I seem to recall it was out early, like JULY 2005 even. I wanna say
RWV  was the first website to put it up.

I know none of that for fact, but I think it is right.

Other than that, I don't know much about it.

Sorry, I can't
be of more help.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 07:12:23 PM
Who got their hands on the first MB KID CAMERA? Was Ren-hooker
involved, a lot evil seems to trail that broom hopper.


she creates it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: sb on April 10, 2007, 07:12:35 PM
Riehl began as a pro-Natalee advocate and somehow, early on, he was turned to the Dark Side. We have always wondered about how that happened although the power of $$$ is well-attested to.

As part of that turn, he was given materials which support the anti-Beth position- spurious pictures, anecdotal info, etc. meant to make Natalee look bad. From somewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 07:13:24 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Who got their hands on the first MB KID CAMERA? Was Ren-hooker
involved, a lot evil seems to trail that broom hopper.


she creates it

According to Dan Riehl - the photos came from a tourist that happened to be at CnC that last night Natalee was there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: sb on April 10, 2007, 07:22:29 PM
If I recall, the CC's pics came into play in early July 05.

Plenty of time for the Photoshop mavens to work their misdeeds.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sleuth on April 10, 2007, 07:23:51 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
As far as the assumption that there might be a shark in the one of the rock site photos.........sorta makes one wonder about the statement "she wanted to go see the sharks".


Welcome Adoronron!

IMO there is no way there is a shark in the rock site photos.  That rock site is not near the ocean, nor is there an inlet in that area.  You can see the ocean from there, but it is not close enough for a shark to be there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 07:25:03 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "adoronron"
As far as the assumption that there might be a shark in the one of the rock site photos.........sorta makes one wonder about the statement "she wanted to go see the sharks".


Welcome Adoronron!

IMO there is no way there is a shark in the rock site photos.  That rock site is not near the ocean, nor is there an inlet in that area.  You can see the ocean from there, but it is not close enough for a shark to be there.

I agree Sleuth.  What we are seeing is rocks that somehow look a little like a shark face.  No shark, just rocks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sleuth on April 10, 2007, 07:26:32 PM
Quote from: "San"
Did anyone see the newest registered users name :lol:


Ahhahahhahahhaahhhahahaha  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:28:14 PM
fraom a quote made by tamiko'smom a page or two back:   ..............One day prior to the activity at the rocks ... on June 10, 2005 ... there was a reported admission by one of the main suspects. Could it be that all this activity at the rocks was related to that admission? Could it be that Aruba was going through the motions of an investigation for the sake of public relations while knowing darn well that Natalee Holloway was no longer there? Could it be that unknown to the suspects Natalee had been moved from where she had first been placed? Could that Natalee had been moved by "somebody close to the young suspects"?
Inreference to where she says above:about Natalee being MOVED from where SHE HAD FIRST BEEN PLACED....This made me think about what Tim Miller found.....a SHALLOW GRAVE  that had someone in, that was later moved. We must remember that there was no DNA found in the grave and they said it was because they could've put the body in a BAG, a PLASTIC BAG!!....So could Natalee have first been in the shallow grave, that Tim Miller found...and then have been moved to the basin in that white bag? Then taken away, by the powers that be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 07:28:34 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Carpe,
What are your monitor settings?  Maybe that's the ticket?

.



Hey Anna,


1024 x 768   -  32 Bit High Quality

screen refresh = 60 Hz


Today, that's considered run of the mill, and to
some high-enders... even paltry!


I have others with higher resolutions, but the workhorse
laptop that I'm using has the specs above.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 07:30:09 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "San"
Did anyone see the newest registered users name :lol:


Ahhahahhahahhaahhhahahaha  :wink:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:31:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Who got their hands on the first MB KID CAMERA? Was Ren-hooker
involved, a lot evil seems to trail that broom hopper.


she creates it

According to Dan Riehl - the photos came from a tourist that happened to be at CnC that last night Natalee was there.
I wouldn't put it past Dan to tell what he thought would be a "white lie" to cover up for the truth Renfro probably gave him those pics...JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sleuth on April 10, 2007, 07:36:16 PM
I saw that monkeys were asking about the size of the cement area containing the bag that is on the AruBay video.  Klaasend and BB are correct - it is approx. 4 ft by 4 ft and is large enough to hold (sorry...) a curled up body.

Some long, long time monkeys will recall 'tests' where one of our monkeys tried to curl up in a bag that would fit in that size area to prove it.  

Monkeys are great at tests - other tried duct taping their hair, etc. to prove/disprove the surfer guy comment, etc. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:38:21 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I saw that monkeys were asking about the size of the cement area containing the bag that is on the AruBay video.  Klaasend and BB are correct - it is approx. 4 ft by 4 ft and is large enough to hold (sorry...) a curled up body.

Some long, long time monkeys will recall 'tests' where one of our monkeys tried to curl up in a bag that would fit in that size area to prove it.  

Monkeys are great at tests - other tried duct taping their hair, etc. to prove/disprove the surfer guy comment, etc. :wink:
They sure did! Ohhhhhhhh the memories this brings back  :D  :lol:  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Carnut on April 10, 2007, 07:38:42 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Anna"
Carpe,
What are your monitor settings?  Maybe that's the ticket?

.



Hey Anna,


1024 x 768   -  32 Bit High Quality

screen refresh = 60 Hz


Today, that's considered run of the mill, and to
some high-enders... even paltry!


I have others with higher resolutions, but the workhorse
laptop that I'm using has the specs above.


Anything higher than 1024x768 is overkill.

Unless you have a very large monitor and just want several screens open at the same time any higher resolution just gets harder to read.

I know several folks who still use 800x600 because of just being more comfortable with the font sizes at that resolution, even on 19" and larger monitors.

I suspicion a lot of folks here are also at the lower resolution because of all the wailing about blowing the margins.

Kind of a conundrum for website designers wanting to keep up with all the latest resolutions and then having to deal with all the folks who seem to be maintaining the lower resolutions on their computers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sleuth on April 10, 2007, 07:39:38 PM
Elaine - I agree.  I would not doubt a Refro-Dan R connection..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sleuth on April 10, 2007, 07:44:53 PM
Bye for now monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:45:20 PM
I see Renfro as someone who tried to slip her foot into everything everywhere, she was even here trying to whitewash everything. This is one place it didn't work  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:46:13 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Bye for now monkeys.
Bye Sleuth!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 07:46:16 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I saw that monkeys were asking about the size of the cement area containing the bag that is on the AruBay video.  Klaasend and BB are correct - it is approx. 4 ft by 4 ft and is large enough to hold (sorry...) a curled up body.

Some long, long time monkeys will recall 'tests' where one of our monkeys tried to curl up in a bag that would fit in that size area to prove it.  

Monkeys are great at tests - other tried duct taping their hair, etc. to prove/disprove the surfer guy comment, etc. :wink:


Ummm...that might have been me doing the curling up.  :oops:

And I had hubby measure me with a measuring tape to see exactly how much space I would take up. Poor hubby - he doesn't even ask anymore why I want him to do these things.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:47:43 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I saw that monkeys were asking about the size of the cement area containing the bag that is on the AruBay video.  Klaasend and BB are correct - it is approx. 4 ft by 4 ft and is large enough to hold (sorry...) a curled up body.

Some long, long time monkeys will recall 'tests' where one of our monkeys tried to curl up in a bag that would fit in that size area to prove it.  

Monkeys are great at tests - other tried duct taping their hair, etc. to prove/disprove the surfer guy comment, etc. :wink:


Ummm...that might have been me doing the curling up.  :oops:

And I had hubby measure me with a measuring tape to see exactly how much space I would take up. Poor hubby - he doesn't even ask anymore why I want him to do these things.  :lol:
:smt044  :smt044


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:49:43 PM
I didn't mean to be rude, I just barged right in here this evening. I wanted to say Hello Monkeys!! And, welcome to Tiger and you too adoronron!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 07:50:01 PM
Here's the cammoguy comparison photo as it was when I obtained it.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
Here is the right hand side of the same photo where I have adjusted contrast, etc, to show that most of the guy's back has been filled in with white.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparisonshowingwhit.jpg)
Does anyone have any idea why someone would do that to the photo?


Ado


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 07:51:44 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Anna is right!  It is a clog.  I see what she is saying.  The person is wearing clogs.  It could very well be Yolanda.  

Carpe
You are now Wane Friggin Newston!!! :lol:  :lol:



Carpe,
We love you, too, but it's a clog!  Magnify to 200 and look at the bottom edge of the pants leg on the right and you will see the end of the dark brown clog and a section of navy blue sock between the clog and the pants leg.

Those are NOT toenails but contrasting triangle stitches or tiny patches of leather, etc.

This one I am positive about and see clearly.  Be sure monitor on full brightness and it's there plain as day.

 :D

But I still love you even if you are wrong.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 07:53:33 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Here's the cammoguy comparison photo as it was when I obtained it.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
Here is the right hand side of the same photo where I have adjusted contrast, etc, to show that most of the guy's back has been filled in with white.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparisonshowingwhit.jpg)
Does anyone have any idea why someone would do that to the photo?


Ado

It's my belief that increasing the contrast of the original photo too much is what caused most of the plaid in the shirt to disappear.  Whoever did it was trying too hard to enhance, to view something else.  Not sure if it was done maliciously or accidentally.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 07:56:48 PM
One of the first things we did with the photos was of course compare the guy at the bar's plaid shirt with Jorans for it was so early we were not fully familiar with how Joran looked and wondered if that guy was him from another angle.

Not the same plaid but sort of similar.

Don't know how it got so washed out, Ado.  Someone trying to make background light enough to see into the dark areas and it makes the shirt go to white, I think?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 07:57:26 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Here's the cammoguy comparison photo as it was when I obtained it.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
Here is the right hand side of the same photo where I have adjusted contrast, etc, to show that most of the guy's back has been filled in with white.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparisonshowingwhit.jpg)
Does anyone have any idea why someone would do that to the photo?


Ado
The only coceivable reason I can come up with is that whoever photoshopped these pics was a Pro-Joran fan. Knowing that Joran always wear checkered shirts, someone wanted to make sure no-one thought that was Joran looking up at Natalee. If you look at the left side of the shirt it is checkered, where it is not white. I never  thought that was Joran looking up, but maybe whoever messed with the photos wanted to guarantee that??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 07:59:46 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Anna"
Carpe,
What are your monitor settings?  Maybe that's the ticket?

.



Hey Anna,


1024 x 768   -  32 Bit High Quality

screen refresh = 60 Hz


Today, that's considered run of the mill, and to
some high-enders... even paltry!


I have others with higher resolutions, but the workhorse
laptop that I'm using has the specs above.


Anything higher than 1024x768 is overkill.

Unless you have a very large monitor and just want several screens open at the same time any higher resolution just gets harder to read.

I know several folks who still use 800x600 because of just being more comfortable with the font sizes at that resolution, even on 19" and larger monitors.

I suspicion a lot of folks here are also at the lower resolution because of all the wailing about blowing the margins.

Kind of a conundrum for website designers wanting to keep up with all the latest resolutions and then having to deal with all the folks who seem to be maintaining the lower resolutions on their computers.


I have the same as Carpe...  My computer is less than a year old and I have one of the flat screens.  I don't have a inclination as to why I am seeing things that others, can't.  I have asked everyone in the house if they see this body and they all agree.  To us, it is, clearly in plain site.
Clear as a bell, even down to the injuries to her ankles.  

I've taken a copy of it and have outlined it with paint, but have no idea of
how to include it in my comment.  I did e-mail it to Klaas and I have printed it out.... I am not crazy.

LaLa's:

Do you want me to e-mail you a copy?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 08:05:44 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Anna"
Carpe,
What are your monitor settings?  Maybe that's the ticket?

.



Hey Anna,


1024 x 768   -  32 Bit High Quality

screen refresh = 60 Hz


Today, that's considered run of the mill, and to
some high-enders... even paltry!


I have others with higher resolutions, but the workhorse
laptop that I'm using has the specs above.


Anything higher than 1024x768 is overkill.

Unless you have a very large monitor and just want several screens open at the same time any higher resolution just gets harder to read.

I know several folks who still use 800x600 because of just being more comfortable with the font sizes at that resolution, even on 19" and larger monitors.

I suspicion a lot of folks here are also at the lower resolution because of all the wailing about blowing the margins.

Kind of a conundrum for website designers wanting to keep up with all the latest resolutions and then having to deal with all the folks who seem to be maintaining the lower resolutions on their computers.


I have the same as Carpe...  My computer is less than a year old and I have one of the flat screens.  I don't have a inclination as to why I am seeing things that others, can't.  I have asked everyone in the house if they see this body and they all agree.  To us, it is, clearly in plain site.
Clear as a bell, even down to the injuries to her ankles.  

I've taken a copy of it and have outlined it with paint, but have no idea of
how to include it in my comment.  I did e-mail it to Klaas and I have printed it out.... I am not crazy.

LaLa's:

Do you want me to e-mail you a copy?
Patti, can I see too?   Casualdolly@aol.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 08:05:51 PM
Quote from: "Patti"

I have the same as Carpe...  My computer is less than a year old and I have one of the flat screens.  I don't have a inclination as to why I am seeing things that others, can't.  I have asked everyone in the house if they see this body and they all agree.  To us, it is, clearly in plain site.
Clear as a bell, even down to the injuries to her ankles.  

I've taken a copy of it and have outlined it with paint, but have no idea of
how to include it in my comment.  I did e-mail it to Klaas and I have printed it out.... I am not crazy.

LaLa's:

Do you want me to e-mail you a copy?


Patti,

Would you email me a copy please. My computer resolution is the same as Carpe's, and my laptop is less than six months old, but all I see are blobs.

sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com

Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 08:11:01 PM
I need to go fix dinner but wanted to post this for Patti first.  Here is her pic:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/38superzoom.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:13:40 PM
Patti
Please.  I want to see it.

Carpe
I was on the barefoot thing from the early morning today.  On my home computer I only saw a foot with painted toenails.  Then when I got to work, I peeked in to see what you guys were talking about and voila! I could see the shoe.  I had to look closer, but it's a shoe.  The computer screen at work is much larger and the resolution is better.  I would not say that is what it is unless I was certain.  You can clearly see the shoe and the socks.  Now that I am home again, I can't see it anymore...just looks like toes again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 08:15:38 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Patti"

I have the same as Carpe...  My computer is less than a year old and I have one of the flat screens.  I don't have a inclination as to why I am seeing things that others, can't.  I have asked everyone in the house if they see this body and they all agree.  To us, it is, clearly in plain site.
Clear as a bell, even down to the injuries to her ankles.  

I've taken a copy of it and have outlined it with paint, but have no idea of
how to include it in my comment.  I did e-mail it to Klaas and I have printed it out.... I am not crazy.

LaLa's:

Do you want me to e-mail you a copy?


Patti,

Would you email me a copy please. My computer resolution is the same as Carpe's, and my laptop is less than six months old, but all I see are blobs.

sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com

Thanks!


 :smt026  Ooh! Ooh! Then email it to me, BT! Puhlease?!

Hi y'all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 08:19:21 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Patti"

I have the same as Carpe...  My computer is less than a year old and I have one of the flat screens.  I don't have a inclination as to why I am seeing things that others, can't.  I have asked everyone in the house if they see this body and they all agree.  To us, it is, clearly in plain site.
Clear as a bell, even down to the injuries to her ankles.  

I've taken a copy of it and have outlined it with paint, but have no idea of
how to include it in my comment.  I did e-mail it to Klaas and I have printed it out.... I am not crazy.

LaLa's:

Do you want me to e-mail you a copy?
Hi Justins, Klaas posted it above.

Patti,

Would you email me a copy please. My computer resolution is the same as Carpe's, and my laptop is less than six months old, but all I see are blobs.

sockmonkey_mom@yahoo.com

Thanks!


 :smt026  Ooh! Ooh! Then email it to me, BT! Puhlease?!

Hi y'all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 08:19:26 PM
I honestly think it's an optical elusion and it's just the bushes, but I could be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:19:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I need to go fix dinner but wanted to post this for Patti first.  Here is her pic:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/38superzoom.png)


I thought that was a bush or something.  I didn't realize that was a rock. I am just terrible at this stuff.  Still say it's a shoe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 08:19:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaas,

Thanks for the reply.

Two of the photo's that I have I got directly from Dan's site. It's just that particular one that I am still trying to find the source of. Perhaps it's one of the many that Dan removed.
It concerns me that in a situation as serious as this, someone fed Dan and others manipulated photo's for public viewing. I'm not going to stop on this until I'm satisfied I have as much info on these as I can find.


I agree, that is my concern as well.  Even the narrow photo that remains on RWV today is the same manipulated one.  So why would it be necessary to send manipulated photos to Dan in July 2005.  At that time the Aruban's and Joran supporters were doing everything they could to paint Natalee in a bad light.  I think they thought by showing a photo of her possibly dancing on the bar at CnC, we would believe she was other than a nice girl.  They were wrong.


Not only that, but I also believe that this was a part of the set up for the blue eyed dutch boy marine crap that Renfro touted. Very, very strange to do this, especially so early.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 08:21:43 PM
My last post got screwed up, LOL! I wanted to tell Justinsmama that klaas just posted Patti's picture at the top of this page. Thanks Klaas... Thanks also to Patti


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 08:23:46 PM
Klaas,
I went to another version of the dancing at the bar photo and applied excess contrast.  It could be just excess contrast that caused the white out.

Ado


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:28:09 PM
Ado
What do you think about those photos?  You are very interested in the bar photo, just curious what you think about them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 08:29:38 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
My last post got screwed up, LOL! I wanted to tell Justinsmama that klaas just posted Patti's picture at the top of this page. Thanks Klaas... Thanks also to Patti


Elaine:

Did you get the 2nd picture okay?

I need to know before I start sending them to the others... I sent it
a different way this time.


Klaas:

Thank you, Darlin'... if it's nothing, it's nothing... but it sure looks real to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 08:31:37 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
I saw that monkeys were asking about the size of the cement area containing the bag that is on the AruBay video.  Klaasend and BB are correct - it is approx. 4 ft by 4 ft and is large enough to hold (sorry...) a curled up body.

Some long, long time monkeys will recall 'tests' where one of our monkeys tried to curl up in a bag that would fit in that size area to prove it.  

Monkeys are great at tests - other tried duct taping their hair, etc. to prove/disprove the surfer guy comment, etc. :wink:


Ummm...that might have been me doing the curling up.  :oops:

And I had hubby measure me with a measuring tape to see exactly how much space I would take up. Poor hubby - he doesn't even ask anymore why I want him to do these things.  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I remember that BT!!  There's been some interesting times in the cage.  I remember not so long ago that if you even took a potty break you would be back 15 pages.  Talk about obsessed!   I know I was.  Still am. I may not have much to say anymore, but I'll be here every day until justice is given Natalee.  Ya'll are awesome.  Monkeys rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 08:32:32 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaas,
I went to another version of the dancing at the bar photo and applied excess contrast.  It could be just excess contrast that caused the white out.

Ado

I think it could.  Let me do a test myself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: snoopy on April 10, 2007, 08:32:35 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
I didn't mean to be rude, I just barged right in here this evening. I wanted to say Hello Monkeys!! And, welcome to Tiger and you too adoronron!


Good to see you Elaine!!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 08:32:42 PM
Quote from: Patti
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Do you see it now?

Start with the X - that is the left knee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:36:16 PM
Quote from: Patti
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Do you see it now?

Start with the X - that is the left knee.


I am still looking for the dog.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 08:37:01 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Barguyconstrast.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 08:37:35 PM
Klaas - Thank you for posting Patti's picture.  I went back to Page 22 (?) and can see it there clearly now.  I realise that distance creates problems with size perspectives but it does seem small for an adult.  Maybe this is the
boy's body they said they found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 08:38:42 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "Elaine"
My last post got screwed up, LOL! I wanted to tell Justinsmama that klaas just posted Patti's picture at the top of this page. Thanks Klaas... Thanks also to Patti


Elaine:

Did you get the 2nd picture okay?

I need to know before I start sending them to the others... I sent it
a different way this time.


Klaas:

Thank you, Darlin'... if it's nothing, it's nothing... but it sure looks real to me.
Yes, sorry was awy from puter a minute here...yes i did, thanks so much!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 08:40:03 PM
Okay... just got word that Elaine got her picture, she said I rock... so I'm
gonna take some time and e-mail the same to everyone that has
requested it.

I also just received an e-mail from Steve Holloway.  I'm going to answer
that as well.

Elaine - YOU rock!!!!

Thanks...

Patti


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 08:40:14 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Elaine"
I didn't mean to be rude, I just barged right in here this evening. I wanted to say Hello Monkeys!! And, welcome to Tiger and you too adoronron!


Good to see you Elaine!!  :D
You too snoopy !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 08:40:15 PM
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 08:44:29 PM
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


San, join the club. I never see what everyone else sees.  :(

At least I did see what Patti meant after Klaas posted the photo with the outline. Phew!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 08:44:37 PM
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100
San, I can lend you my glasses! :lol:  :lol: it looks like a small body, like tibro said, maybe that young child they found?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 08:44:57 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Klaas - Thank you for posting Patti's picture.  I went back to Page 22 (?) and can see it there clearly now.  I realise that distance creates problems with size perspectives but it does seem small for an adult.  Maybe this is the
boy's body they said they found.


One quick comment before I go....

No, that boy was supposedly buried for a year... does that
look like the body of a boy that has been dead for a year?

You can still see the blood, from injuries, there is no sign of the kind of
decay that would be expected with a body that has been decaying for a
long period of time.

In my opinion, it's not him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 10, 2007, 08:45:56 PM
Quote from: Patti
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Do you see it now?

Start with the X - that is the left knee.


Patti,  I do see what you mean, it does look like a torso, legs and arms.

I still get so tearful and queasy when I see these things.  I sometimes think I don't want to be able to see them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 08:46:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


This is the area where Patti thinks she is seeing a body.  I believe it's only the bushes and it's an elusion.  I see what she is seeing, I just don't believe it's actually a body at all.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:46:43 PM
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 10, 2007, 08:48:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


This is the area where Patti thinks she is seeing a body.  I believe it's only the bushes and it's an elusion.  I see what she is seeing, I just don't believe it's actually a body at all.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


I guess I would wonder why the guy is painting rocks with a body in full view.   :?:  :?:  :?: Wouldn't it be covered or removed by then?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 08:51:53 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Anna is right!  It is a clog.  I see what she is saying.  The person is wearing clogs.  It could very well be Yolanda.  

Carpe
You are now Wane Friggin Newston!!! :lol:  :lol:



Carpe,
We love you, too, but it's a clog!  Magnify to 200 and look at the bottom edge of the pants leg on the right and you will see the end of the dark brown clog and a section of navy blue sock between the clog and the pants leg.

Those are NOT toenails but contrasting triangle stitches or tiny patches of leather, etc.

This one I am positive about and see clearly.  Be sure monitor on full brightness and it's there plain as day.

 :D

But I still love you even if you are wrong.   :wink:




Shoes do not have toe nails or long toes...

here's more PROOF,  BARE FEET. :D


100 200 400 PERCENT

DIFFERENT FRAMES


>>>BARE FEET
:wink:

(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dssddssdsds-1.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Carnut on April 10, 2007, 08:52:00 PM
Looks more like a Pixie holding a candle up in the air to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:52:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


This is the area where Patti thinks she is seeing a body.  I believe it's only the bushes and it's an elusion.  I see what she is seeing, I just don't believe it's actually a body at all.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


I see a bush.  Just a bush.  I went to the video and watched it.  I see a bush. Notice I am not saying it is a bush...because I am not completely sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 08:54:35 PM
Carpe
That is not a good pic.  There is one that you posted the link to earlier today and when Anna said look at the pant leg and you could see the socks...she is right.  I can't see it on this monitor, but I swear it is there.  The one at work is much, much better to see what she is talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 08:55:01 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


This is the area where Patti thinks she is seeing a body.  I believe it's only the bushes and it's an elusion.  I see what she is seeing, I just don't believe it's actually a body at all.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


I see a bush.  Just a bush.  I went to the video and watched it.  I see a bush. Notice I am not saying it is a bush...because I am not completely sure.


Well, if I hold my mouth just right when I look at the yellow square, I see a giant skull. :shock:  Now, I'm not saying it's there - I'm convinced it's an optical illusion. All I'm saying is that I can see a giant skull.  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 08:55:59 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Looks more like a Pixie holding a candle up in the air to me.


Wee Willie Winkie ?

Hi, Carnut - nice to see you and the cars.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 08:57:24 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
That is not a good pic.  There is one that you posted the link to earlier today and when Anna said look at the pant leg and you could see the socks...she is right.  I can't see it on this monitor, but I swear it is there.  The one at work is much, much better to see what she is talking about.


no socks, no clogs, no "perfect triangles"


not in anything I picked  on yet anyway


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 09:00:28 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
That is not a good pic.  There is one that you posted the link to earlier today and when Anna said look at the pant leg and you could see the socks...she is right.  I can't see it on this monitor, but I swear it is there.  The one at work is much, much better to see what she is talking about.


no socks, no clogs, no "perfect triangles"


not in anything I picked  on yet anyway


The photo you posted earlier was much clearer to me than this one and I could see toes. With the enlarged one you just posted, I'm back to seeing blobs. I wish I could figure out how to adjust my settings some way that would allow me to see what some of the rest of you see.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:01:07 PM
What Patti sees as a body


is a human head...


and here it is close up:

(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 10, 2007, 09:04:31 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Looks more like a Pixie holding a candle up in the air to me.

Hey CarNut!
Long time, glad to see you back in the mix.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:04:36 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/RTTR555.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:06:46 PM
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/Foot3.jpg



(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/errrrrrrrf.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:08:30 PM
Those are some nasty lookin' feet!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:08:54 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
That is not a good pic.  There is one that you posted the link to earlier today and when Anna said look at the pant leg and you could see the socks...she is right.  I can't see it on this monitor, but I swear it is there.  The one at work is much, much better to see what she is talking about.


no socks, no clogs, no "perfect triangles"


not in anything I picked  on yet anyway


I wish I could make you sit right beside me at work and I would show you what Anna is talking about.  It is a brown shoe, dark blue sock and a pants leg.  For the person with the camera to be Yolanda it has to be a shoe, otherwise someone else is holding the camera.  A very dark-skinned person.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:09:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I honestly think it's an optical elusion and it's just the bushes, but I could be wrong.



it's a human head. imo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: sb on April 10, 2007, 09:10:15 PM
I will say this: IF that is a bare top of a foot, that is the first person I have ever seen whose toenails grow only on the left side of the top of the toe, and who has sharpened their toenails to a point. That would be a rather weird pedicure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 09:10:24 PM
It still looks like a dark-skinned foot with lighter toenails to me. As Klaas says, it certainly seems like an uncomfortable place to go barefoot, but I've known people who like to go barefoot a lot who have developed very tough feet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 09:10:55 PM
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


This is the one showing the little section of sock, not that one.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 09:11:23 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I honestly think it's an optical elusion and it's just the bushes, but I could be wrong.



it's a human head. imo

Carpe - I'm talking about what Patti is seeing in the bushes.  I haven't even studies what you are seeing as a head yet.  I've been busy with stuff today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:13:00 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Those are some nasty lookin' feet!



ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLMAO

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

YOU AIN'T JES WHISTLIN' DIXIE!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 09:13:49 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


This is the one showing the little section of sock, not that one.

.


Okay, maybe I'm getting better at this. If the sock is on the right-hand side, then I might see what you're talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:14:08 PM
Well, I too am going to the eye doctor...can't see a thing.  On BFN, there was a discussion yesterday about the bar photo.  I haveno idea who jack is or what this means but I am going to post his directions and summary of the bar photo.  If anyone agrees with his take on this photo, I would like to know.

The part of the girl who appears to be dancing needs to be sectioned out along with the box and bricks behind her with the lettering down to where part of the girl whose tall supposed hair is.  The photo then needs to be save in JPEG and placed in Paint shop pro of some good program.

The picture needs to be then pasted into that program as a new image as JPEG
and rename it what you want.

Mirrow the image and flip the girl, then mirror.
Then do this in this order:

back lighting, then fill flash.
Remove artifacts.  Make sure your seeting are low on these.  Experiment until you get focus.

Then start looking at the colors and the arm (lower part is totally gone.)  There is a stump.  The girl is lying down.  You can see the beer bottle in an empty crate behind her is now sitting upright and you can read Bev, and some lettering.
I do not know if they are in dutch but.  The lettering and bricks and prone position of the girl is obvious and there are bruises and contusions, showing quite plainly.  Now have a field day.  I will try to help you, but that should give you some idea.  This is nasty, but they either figured someone would figure it out and think she is deceased or she in fact is, or staged so she can be disappeared and not looked for. From what I am finding, it is looking like she may very well have been staged after being deceased. Anyway, I hate those freaking jerks with a passion, either way who are such worms without a nervous system to speak of.  Do not be too harsh with me about this, as it about kills me to even have to go here on this.  I am wanting someone to look, as I am tired as heck over this.          j/b


http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=6733.120


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:14:10 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/RTTR555.png)


Look at the bottom of the pant leg near the right side.  You can see the edge of the shoe and the blue sock.  It is there.  This pic I am seeing here is just too blurry.  I am speaking from memory.  If I could draw on it I would show you, but I don't know how to do that.  The shoe is some type of sandal that is made of leather.  I don't know any other way to convince you...so I will leave it at that.  I am not an expert on this and I certainly don't think I ever will be.   We are going to have to disagree.  I need an Etch a Sketch.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:15:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I honestly think it's an optical elusion and it's just the bushes, but I could be wrong.



it's a human head. imo

Carpe - I'm talking about what Patti is seeing in the bushes.  I haven't even studies what you are seeing as a head yet.  I've been busy with stuff today.



oh no klaas, sorry...

I was just saying what Patti sketched was a torso... and she did it

on a head that has had mild deterioration, and the tongue is still pink and poken out of the mouth


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:15:37 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


This is the one showing the little section of sock, not that one.

.


That's the one!  Look at everyone...it's a shoe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 09:15:37 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:16:04 PM
where she sees a body, it's a human head.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 09:17:24 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I will say this: IF that is a bare top of a foot, that is the first person I have ever seen whose toenails grow only on the left side of the top of the toe, and who has sharpened their toenails to a point. That would be a rather weird pedicure.
ROFLMAO!! Sorry I can't help it, I cam back to this post and I am dying laughing here! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 09:17:31 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Those are some nasty lookin' feet!


Sure are fugly!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:17:42 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


I wear glasses and I don't see a body and I missed the dog too. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 09:18:09 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, I too am going to the eye doctor...can't see a thing.  On BFN, there was a discussion yesterday about the bar photo.  I haveno idea who jack is or what this means but I am going to post his directions and summary of the bar photo.  If anyone agrees with his take on this photo, I would like to know.

The part of the girl who appears to be dancing needs to be sectioned out along with the box and bricks behind her with the lettering down to where part of the girl whose tall supposed hair is.  The photo then needs to be save in JPEG and placed in Paint shop pro of some good program.

The picture needs to be then pasted into that program as a new image as JPEG
and rename it what you want.

Mirrow the image and flip the girl, then mirror.
Then do this in this order:

back lighting, then fill flash.
Remove artifacts.  Make sure your seeting are low on these.  Experiment until you get focus.

Then start looking at the colors and the arm (lower part is totally gone.)  There is a stump.  The girl is lying down.  You can see the beer bottle in an empty crate behind her is now sitting upright and you can read Bev, and some lettering.
I do not know if they are in dutch but.  The lettering and bricks and prone position of the girl is obvious and there are bruises and contusions, showing quite plainly.  Now have a field day.  I will try to help you, but that should give you some idea.  This is nasty, but they either figured someone would figure it out and think she is deceased or she in fact is, or staged so she can be disappeared and not looked for. From what I am finding, it is looking like she may very well have been staged after being deceased. Anyway, I hate those freaking jerks with a passion, either way who are such worms without a nervous system to speak of.  Do not be too harsh with me about this, as it about kills me to even have to go here on this.  I am wanting someone to look, as I am tired as heck over this.          j/b


http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=6733.120


I'm not doubting that the person who said this knows what they're talking about - but it reminds me of the directions for how to play the song backward so that you can hear the Beatles saying that Paul is dead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:20:12 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"

I'm not doubting that the person who said this knows what they're talking about - but it reminds me of the directions for how to play the song backward so that you can hear the Beatles saying that Paul is dead.


And didn't we do that to every single album to get "all" the secret messages....oh, those were the days...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 09:20:17 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
What Patti sees as a body


is a human head...


and here it is close up:

(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/sss5656ff.png)


WOW, Carpe... that is one big human skull... zoom back out and check out the size of that martian.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:20:45 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, I too am going to the eye doctor...can't see a thing.  On BFN, there was a discussion yesterday about the bar photo.  I haveno idea who jack is or what this means but I am going to post his directions and summary of the bar photo.  If anyone agrees with his take on this photo, I would like to know.

The part of the girl who appears to be dancing needs to be sectioned out along with the box and bricks behind her with the lettering down to where part of the girl whose tall supposed hair is.  The photo then needs to be save in JPEG and placed in Paint shop pro of some good program.

The picture needs to be then pasted into that program as a new image as JPEG
and rename it what you want.

Mirrow the image and flip the girl, then mirror.
Then do this in this order:

back lighting, then fill flash.
Remove artifacts.  Make sure your seeting are low on these.  Experiment until you get focus.

Then start looking at the colors and the arm (lower part is totally gone.)  There is a stump.  The girl is lying down.  You can see the beer bottle in an empty crate behind her is now sitting upright and you can read Bev, and some lettering.
I do not know if they are in dutch but.  The lettering and bricks and prone position of the girl is obvious and there are bruises and contusions, showing quite plainly.  Now have a field day.  I will try to help you, but that should give you some idea.  This is nasty, but they either figured someone would figure it out and think she is deceased or she in fact is, or staged so she can be disappeared and not looked for. From what I am finding, it is looking like she may very well have been staged after being deceased. Anyway, I hate those freaking jerks with a passion, either way who are such worms without a nervous system to speak of.  Do not be too harsh with me about this, as it about kills me to even have to go here on this.  I am wanting someone to look, as I am tired as heck over this.          j/b


http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=6733.120


Can someone here do this? Carpe?!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:21:17 PM
I think I need some Shango...makes more sense to me. LOL :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 09:21:44 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/photographersfoot.png)


I don't know how to draw arrows but the shoe ends on the right side just before it meets the pants and there is a section of dark blue sock.

Magnify to about 150 to see it better using magnification on the bottom of screen.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 09:22:12 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Wonder what they give you after trifocals..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:23:46 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Wonder what they give you after trifocals..... :)


Don't know but since the trifocals are $500, I'd hate to think of the cost... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 09:24:52 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Ado


What do you think about those photos?  You are very interested in the bar photo, just curious what you think about them.


Lala's Mom,

I was off doing some stuff for the past hour or so.

I'm wanting to know who fabricated them, and when. But, it seems the end of the trail on those fake bar photo's begins and ends on the date they were posted at Reihl World.  The person who fabricated them or ordered the fabrication of them may very well have also spread a lot more misinformation. I want to know who it is so when I go poking around in achieved information I'll be aware that anything this person is quoted as saying is suspect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 09:28:06 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Wonder what they give you after trifocals..... :)


binoculars?  I think that will be my next prescription after looking at all these photos, although I haven't progressed to trifocals yet.  May save money and go straight to the binoculars - or a telescope?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 09:29:05 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "BTgirl"

I'm not doubting that the person who said this knows what they're talking about - but it reminds me of the directions for how to play the song backward so that you can hear the Beatles saying that Paul is dead.


And didn't we do that to every single album to get "all" the secret messages....oh, those were the days...



Buckeye,
I believe Jack is also Blue, the original one, not the female who posts at scrux, and he was an original poster at RWV when these photos and others came in.  

He does have some photographic skills and is sort of familiar with that technique of making a big photo out of a lot of little bitty ones to show something entirely different.

I would not totally discount him.  In fact we almost went blind trying to see stufff on his advice, lol, but he has done some professional or semi professional work as photographer and i used to have a link to some of his photos, long ago.  

Maybe carpe will quit playing with the photographer's SHOE and do this.

CBB also might could do it, not sure.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 09:29:25 PM
I believe this is the head Carpe is talking about.  I lean towards it being an illusion:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/head2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:29:56 PM
Carpe~ Can you outline and label parts of the bush/head/body?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:30:19 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ereere.png)


Another, bare foot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 09:30:56 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Wonder what they give you after trifocals..... :)


I think it walks on four legs and barks, MeMere!   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 09:31:07 PM
Anna - I think cbb is keeping a low profile, after leading Hummingbird astray last night  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:31:24 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Carpe~ Can you outline and label parts of the bush/head/body?



I did, justins... do you want me to repost, or ya wanna see it
in my Photobucket?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 09:32:51 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ereere.png)


Another, bare foot.



Why does this bare foot turn blue just before going into the pants on the right, carpe???   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

Lalas,
Is there a rule about refusing to see clogs that you can put carpe in the book about?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 09:36:02 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ereere.png)


Another, bare foot.



Why does this bare foot turn blue just before going into the pants on the right, carpe???   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

Lalas,
Is there a rule about refusing to see clogs that you can put carpe in the book about?

.

Lack of Oxygen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:36:27 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Carpe~ Can you outline and label parts of the bush/head/body?



I did, justins... do you want me to repost, or ya wanna see it
in my Photobucket?


Not the arrows and X one, as I cannot make heads nor tails of that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 09:38:34 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Carpe~ Can you outline and label parts of the bush/head/body?



I did, justins... do you want me to repost, or ya wanna see it
in my Photobucket?


Not the arrows and X one, as I cannot make heads nor tails of that one.


Do you want me to e-mail my picture to you?

LaLa's:

I sent yours to your 71 address.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:38:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "BTgirl"

I'm not doubting that the person who said this knows what they're talking about - but it reminds me of the directions for how to play the song backward so that you can hear the Beatles saying that Paul is dead.


And didn't we do that to every single album to get "all" the secret messages....oh, those were the days...



Buckeye,
I believe Jack is also Blue, the original one, not the female who posts at scrux, and he was an original poster at RWV when these photos and others came in.  

He does have some photographic skills and is sort of familiar with that technique of making a big photo out of a lot of little bitty ones to show something entirely different.

I would not totally discount him.  In fact we almost went blind trying to see stufff on his advice, lol, but he has done some professional or semi professional work as photographer and i used to have a link to some of his photos, long ago.  

Maybe carpe will quit playing with the photographer's SHOE and do this.

CBB also might could do it, not sure.

.


I do remember blue....it is a spooky post and I would be interested to know if it can be reproduced.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 09:39:04 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Wonder what they give you after trifocals..... :)


I think it walks on four legs and barks, MeMere!   :D


Anna...you are too funny...thanks for a big laugh.... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:39:23 PM
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dfdff.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:39:31 PM
Dang, but it sure looks like a foot to me, and an ugly one at that (not that there are any good looking feets). LOL @ lack of oxygen!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 09:39:36 PM
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:41:04 PM
Now I see what you are seeing, Carpe. I usually need "visuals for dummies".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:41:12 PM
LOL Klaas!!! Where'd you find those? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:41:22 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/ereere.png)


Another, bare foot.


No. No. No.  It's a foot in a sandal.  I can see it on this monitor now that Anna posted it.  Look at the foot. If the foot is bare...the toes are sticking out the end and then you can see skin on the right next to the BOTTOM of the pant leg.  If it's a sock then it's a shoe with some kind of stitching near the toe area.  If I could draw on this computer I could prove it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 09:41:45 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
LOL Klaas!!! Where'd you find those? :lol:


Google, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 10, 2007, 09:41:53 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/trgffffffff.png


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/Foot3.jpg



(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/errrrrrrrf.png)


that could be...one foot crossed over the other, as in standing taking pictures.  Carpe is right though, it is bare feet to me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 09:42:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
I'm making an appointment with the eye doctor tomorrow because I just don't see what you are seeing in these photos. :smt120  :smt100


Make me an appointment also.  :wink:


Could we get a discount for a group booking ?


Wonder what they give you after trifocals..... :)


I think it walks on four legs and barks, MeMere!   :D
ROFL! You monkeys are funny  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:42:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:42:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


AHA! Everyone is correct!  :smt005


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:42:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


Now then...even I can see this...and with a blue sock...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 10, 2007, 09:43:12 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I will say this: IF that is a bare top of a foot, that is the first person I have ever seen whose toenails grow only on the left side of the top of the toe, and who has sharpened their toenails to a point. That would be a rather weird pedicure.


Not if your husband snores!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:43:34 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Dang, but it sure looks like a foot to me, and an ugly one at that (not that there are any good looking feets). LOL @ lack of oxygen!



I FEEL IT IN MY FEETS!!!!!!!! :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 09:43:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


 :smt044  :smt044  :smt044  :smt044  :smt044  :smt044  :smt016


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 09:44:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n207/Mere_08/laughingman.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:44:08 PM
pssst, Carpe You're caps lock is OFF


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 09:45:15 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n207/Mere_08/laughingman.gif)


I flipped them so they are facing the correct direction, lololol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:45:17 PM
Carpe

Can you try to follow jack/Blue's directions on the previous page and reproduce the bar photo??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 09:45:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)
OH MY  G_O_D !! :smt043


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:45:32 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


Now then...even I can see this...and with a blue sock...



ROFL Buckeye...


Yes, and if you look carefully, there's a human head next to it. Wait ...

I'll show everybody...  :wink:    just kiddin


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:46:41 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Carpe

Can you try to follow jack/Blue's directions on the previous page and reproduce the bar photo??



Certainly, I can have it done by tomorrow. I have some stuff
lined up for tonight already. Is that okay?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 09:47:48 PM
You guyz are all just killing me tonight! I'll be so pumped from laughing, I won't be able to sleep! It's like old times.  :thumright:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:48:10 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Carpe

Can you try to follow jack/Blue's directions on the previous page and reproduce the bar photo??



Certainly, I can have it done by tomorrow. I have some stuff
lined up for tonight already. Is that okay?


Sure, it's been two years...I'm just curious if his theory is possible and someone actually posted a picture like that so early in the case.  TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:49:01 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dfdff.png)



This poor soul was shot in the right temple and the blood
is oozing from the right temple exit wound. You can see it
dark/ and somewhat red in that area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 09:50:00 PM
reverse that


LEFT TEMPLE / RIGHT TEMPLE

sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:50:17 PM
If you can see the blood and the tongue, why is the skull, itself, so skeletal??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 09:50:49 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
You guyz are all just killing me tonight! I'll be so pumped from laughing, I won't be able to sleep! It's like old times.  :thumright:
My boyfriend heard me laughing hysterically, and yelled in "I know whats happening, you guys are making funny pictures of the suspects again"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 09:50:49 PM
Buckeye - That bar photo was photoshopped, that I am sure of.  I would not discount what Jack is saying.  I'll try to replicate it later tonight if I get a chance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 09:51:12 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/dfdff.png)



This poor soul was shot in the right temple and the blood
is oozing from the right temple exit wound. You can see it
dark/ and somewhat red in that area.


:(     Whomever it is. Pretty decayed looking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 09:52:12 PM
Carpe,

Can you do me a favor? Go and grab these photo's and then with each photo keep zooming in on the sitting guy's nose. Then let me know if you see a small picture of a certain well known person on the bridge of the nose in one of the photo's. To make sure you're not grabbing a dancing on the bar photo that's been going from site to site you should grab the one from the March 23 2006 Reihl World page.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/121451.jpg)

Thanks
Adoronron


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 10, 2007, 09:52:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


Now,  paint the toe nails white!  where did you find this???? :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 09:52:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Buckeye - That bar photo was photoshopped, that I am sure of.  I would not discount what Jack is saying.  I'll try to replicate it later tonight if I get a chance.


Thanks...I know it's not a legit pic...I just want to know if they really used a picture of Natalee bruised and lying down to produce the chopped picture....just sick...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 09:53:08 PM
Welcome Adoronron and  Tiger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 09:53:37 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)[/quote]

Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:53:55 PM
Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
The Kalpoes have nothing to spill. They don’t what the father did. Only Joran knows why he called his Dad in the middle of the night.


I bet they know now.  She woke up.  They thought she was unconscious, just like all the rest of the girls.  She woke up and they knew they were in trouble.  She already had the head injury...not severe enough to kill her. (Satish..."Is the girl okay?")  The K2 had already left by this time.  Then Paulus knew he had to do whatever it took to keep his son from being the scapegoat.  That is when he took out the gun.  JMO

See, I can do this...it's so much easier.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 09:57:36 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.[/quote]

It's bigger than that jug which I would say is probably at least 2 - 2 1/2
feet tall.

In my opinion... it's not a skull at all, it's the background, the brush, with
a body lying in it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 09:57:48 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Carpe,

Can you do me a favor? Go and grab these photo's and then with each photo keep zooming in on the sitting guy's nose. Then let me know if you see a small picture of a certain well known person on the bridge of the nose in one of the photo's. To make sure you're not grabbing a dancing on the bar photo that's been going from site to site you should grab the one from the March 23 2006 Reihl World page.
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/cammonguyatbarcomparison.jpg)
(http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u134/adoronron_2007/121451.jpg)

Thanks
Adoronron
I can answer this one YES, if you see a picture of Joran in black and white, YES I saw it too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 09:58:17 PM
Carpe,

If that is a skull (and it very well could be-who am I to say?), do you have any speculation on whose it could be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: nonesuche on April 10, 2007, 09:59:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


all of you are cracking me up  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I don't even wear bifocals and I am lost in this translation........but Tib you can share my telescope with me, I decided I must need an extra large one

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/anifac/08551630.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 09:59:44 PM
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.[/quote]

I see your face!  It's an optical illusion.  It's a bush.  It's a scruffy looking bush.  There is no body there.  The body would have to be in an upright position. JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 10:00:01 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


all of you are cracking me up  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I don't even wear bifocals and I am lost in this translation........but Tib you can share my telescope with me, I decided I must need an extra large one

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/anifac/08551630.gif)



   ROFL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 10:00:06 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/barguynose1.jpg)


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Barguynose2.jpg)

Not as bad as this though IMO:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BarPhotoFreaky.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BarphotoFreaky2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 10:04:02 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 10:04:18 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.


I see your face!  It's an optical illusion.  It's a bush.  It's a scruffy looking bush.  There is no body there.  The body would have to be in an upright position. JMO[/quote]

LaLa's:  Either that or the ground is rising behind the painter.... which in
my opinion is a perfectly good explanation.  That is why there is only sky beyond the peak of the ridge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:05:19 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.


I see your face!  It's an optical illusion.  It's a bush.  It's a scruffy looking bush.  There is no body there.  The body would have to be in an upright position. JMO[/quote]


lalas.... it's a head.... a head that is deteriorated it is massively discolored from being outdoors and in the sun....

It matches the bushes, which are behind the head.


A bush DOES NOT HAVE A PINK TONGUE and blood dripping from

an ADHESIVE PATCH.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 10, 2007, 10:05:34 PM
Heading out before I get keyboard face....!   :D

Carpe...something to think about...skeletel remains would not have a pink tongue...fleshy tissue is first to go....and how about this being an animal...like dog or donkey....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 10:06:43 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


all of you are cracking me up  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I don't even wear bifocals and I am lost in this translation........but Tib you can share my telescope with me, I decided I must need an extra large one

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/anifac/08551630.gif)


That is the very thing, None.  A radio telescope observatory.  We have one here so I will see if I can borrow it   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 10:07:13 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Heading out before I get keyboard face....!   :D

Carpe...something to think about...skeletel remains would not have a pink tongue...fleshy tissue is first to go....and how about this being an animal...like dog or donkey....
Take care mere!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 10:08:20 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.


I see your face!  It's an optical illusion.  It's a bush.  It's a scruffy looking bush.  There is no body there.  The body would have to be in an upright position. JMO



lalas.... it's a head.... a head that is deteriorated it is massively discolored from being outdoors and in the sun....

It matches the bushes, which are behind the head.


A bush DOES NOT HAVE A PINK TONGUE and blood dripping from

an ADHESIVE PATCH.
[/quote]

I agree there is blood dripping, but that's not an adhesive bandage you're
looking at.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 10:08:46 PM
I see the face on the bridge of the nose, and it seems vaguely familiar. Anyone got any ideas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:09:04 PM
actual human hair stops at around his knee area...


also they are on uneven rock, just like patti noted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 10:09:20 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.


I see your face!  It's an optical illusion.  It's a bush.  It's a scruffy looking bush.  There is no body there.  The body would have to be in an upright position. JMO



lalas.... it's a head.... a head that is deteriorated it is massively discolored from being outdoors and in the sun....

It matches the bushes, which are behind the head.


A bush DOES NOT HAVE A PINK TONGUE and blood dripping from

an ADHESIVE PATCH.
[/quote]

why would a deteriorated head have "dripping" blood and a pink tongue??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 10:09:32 PM
All of these Joran's in the dancing on the bar photo and no one knows when the picture was fabricated. Would be helpful to know if it was fabricated when Joran was in jail or not. That's one of the reasons why I was so interested in who supplied them and when.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 10:10:14 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I'VE SOLVED IT!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes.jpg)


all of you are cracking me up  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I don't even wear bifocals and I am lost in this translation........but Tib you can share my telescope with me, I decided I must need an extra large one

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/anifac/08551630.gif)
LOL.. Hiya nones!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:10:50 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Carpe,

If that is a skull (and it very well could be-who am I to say?), do you have any speculation on whose it could be?



hi BT

not a clue, and I feel strongly from inspecting it for months, it is
not Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:12:01 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
All of these Joran's in the dancing on the bar photo and no one knows when the picture was fabricated. Would be helpful to know if it was fabricated when Joran was in jail or not. That's one of the reasons why I was so interested in who supplied them and when.



Joran was in jail as of the morning of 6/9/2005, I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:12:13 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
actual human hair stops at around his knee area...


also they are on uneven rock, just like patti noted.


Where is the tongue?  I don't see no tongue!  :roll:

Maybe I am not the one that needs their eyes checked.  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 10:12:16 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
All of these Joran's in the dancing on the bar photo and no one knows when the picture was fabricated. Would be helpful to know if it was fabricated when Joran was in jail or not. That's one of the reasons why I was so interested in who supplied them and when.

There's only one person that I know of to ask is Dan Riehl.  Dan is the one who was sent the photos.  I doubt Dan will tell us his source.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 10:13:02 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/38superzoom.png)[/quote]

That's what I see.... and I don't have to use a pointer to explain what
anything is.... it's obvious.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:13:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 4:02 pm
The Kalpoes have nothing to spill. They don’t what the father did. Only Joran knows why he called his Dad in the middle of the night.


I bet they know now.  She woke up.  They thought she was unconscious, just like all the rest of the girls.  She woke up and they knew they were in trouble.  She already had the head injury...not severe enough to kill her. (Satish..."Is the girl okay?")  The K2 had already left by this time.  Then Paulus knew he had to do whatever it took to keep his son from being the scapegoat.  That is when he took out the gun.  JMO

See, I can do this...it's so much easier.  :roll:


If were are going with scenairo I think she woke up and that's how she suffered her head injury from Joran.  You are right about Paulus, he had to do whatever it took to cover for his sons actions.

Let's add the phone call to this.  Joran beat her after she managed to make that call.  When he caught her they fought and that is when he severely harmed her.  Paulus knew about the call so now he knows that Kidnapping and Rape charges could stick now add battery Joran is finished.  Paulus could very well be the murderer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 10:14:06 PM
Carpe~ The area from which you magnified the image of a head~ is it the same area that is squared off or is it lower?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:14:12 PM
Night Mere, sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:14:42 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Patti"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/stain1bushes.jpg)


Carpe:

After you zoom out - you will find that that skull covers an area as
large as from the man's ankles to his thighs.


I see your face!  It's an optical illusion.  It's a bush.  It's a scruffy looking bush.  There is no body there.  The body would have to be in an upright position. JMO



lalas.... it's a head.... a head that is deteriorated it is massively discolored from being outdoors and in the sun....

It matches the bushes, which are behind the head.


A bush DOES NOT HAVE A PINK TONGUE and blood dripping from

an ADHESIVE PATCH.


why would a deteriorated head have "dripping" blood and a pink tongue??[/quote]



It was a fresh kill. We are not talking pirates bones here. This was
a person killed & been dead probably 24 - 48 hours. Not dead long
at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on April 10, 2007, 10:16:00 PM
How many states passed the bill to urge citizens to boycott Aruba?

My wife had her pocket book stolen in Food City today! The Pepsi man  stocking shelves saw it happen chased the thief and kept in touch with the police via his cell phone until they caught up with the thief and arrested him! She was lucky thet she got everything back!

I offered him $100. reward after I got there and he declined! My wife contacted Pepsi and reported his remarkable deed! ii am still going to send hIm a gift for dinner at a local restaurant! that way he may take it!

SEE THERE ARE SOME GREAT HUMAN BEINGS LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 10:16:35 PM
Carpe

Then why does the head appear skeletal??...the eyes, the nose...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 10, 2007, 10:17:00 PM
Going to sleep... will check back tomorrow for further discussions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:17:51 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Carpe~ The area from which you magnified the image of a head~ is it the same area that is squared off or is it lower?


It can be seen if you look dead center in the square,

the square is off slightly... but look right in the middle of it


it is all there. That is pretty much the "hot box"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 10:18:02 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"

It was a fresh kill. We are not talking pirates bones here. This was
a person killed & been dead probably 24 - 48 hours. Not dead long
at all.


Okay, this is really gross and yucky and I can't believe I'm saying it - but, wouldn't someone who had been deceased 24-48 hours be bloated, rather than skeletal looking?

Sowwy.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 10:18:47 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
How many states passed the bill to urge citizens to boycott Aruba?

My wife had her pocket book stolen in Food City today! The Pepsi man  stocking shelves saw it happen chased the thief and kept in touch with the police via his cell phone until they caught up with the thief and arrested him! She was lucky thet she got everything back!

I offered him $100. reward after I got there and he declined! My wife contacted Pepsi and reported his remarkable deed! ii am still going to send hIm a gift for dinner at a local restaurant! that way he may take it!

SEE THERE ARE SOME GREAT HUMAN BEINGS LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!
Yes there are! I am glad your wife got it back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 10:19:14 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
All of these Joran's in the dancing on the bar photo and no one knows when the picture was fabricated. Would be helpful to know if it was fabricated when Joran was in jail or not. That's one of the reasons why I was so interested in who supplied them and when.


I believe Klaas found the original post to have happened July 22, 2005, Ado.  Dan claimed to have posted them as soon as he received them and could get them on a server.

He is the only one who know where he got them.  You could email and ask him.   :roll: Doubt he would reveal his super secret source, however.  I am banned for life from his site for some reason.   :wink: We has a little misunderstanding.  


Yes, I would love to know where he got them, too, but he would prolly consider that a breach of confidentiality.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 10:21:11 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Going to sleep... will check back tomorrow for further discussions.
Good night Justins!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:22:14 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"

It was a fresh kill. We are not talking pirates bones here. This was
a person killed & been dead probably 24 - 48 hours. Not dead long
at all.


Okay, this is really gross and yucky and I can't believe I'm saying it - but, wouldn't someone who had been deceased 24-48 hours be bloated, rather than skeletal looking?

Sowwy.  :?




Try this:

http://www.deathonline.net/decomposition/decomposition/index.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 10:22:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FunnyShoes2.jpg)



Now I want a pair of these to wear as house slippers!  They are really funny!

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:23:04 PM
San
Can you see the head or the body?  What about you Justins?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 10, 2007, 10:24:24 PM
Why would the cops let a body remain there while two guys are painting rocks white? If you are covering up a crime that has international attention, you are not going to leave the body of the victum out in broad daylight. It seems obvious the powers on that island can do a very good job of keeping information tight to their chests. No way is that a body IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:24:42 PM
The head I think is around STAGE 2


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:25:40 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
San
Can you see the head or the body?  What about you Justins?

I see five ugly toes :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 10:25:41 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"

It was a fresh kill. We are not talking pirates bones here. This was
a person killed & been dead probably 24 - 48 hours. Not dead long
at all.


Okay, this is really gross and yucky and I can't believe I'm saying it - but, wouldn't someone who had been deceased 24-48 hours be bloated, rather than skeletal looking?

Sowwy.  :?




Try this:

http://www.deathonline.net/decomposition/decomposition/index.htm


Well, that's actually a good site, especially for someone who is hankering to write a murder mystery.  :P  However, I couldn't look too much at decaying pigs right after having my nightly milk and cookies.  :?  I will have to check it out later when my stomach is emptier.

TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:26:38 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Why would the cops let a body remain there while two guys are painting rocks white? If you are covering up a crime that has international attention, you are not going to leave the body of the victum out in broad daylight. It seems obvious the powers on that island can do a very good job of keeping information tight to their chests. No way is that a body IMO.



There was a body there, the ALE will even admit this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on April 10, 2007, 10:27:14 PM
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:27:27 PM
They claim it was a 7 year old Colombian boy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 10:28:32 PM
Night Justins, sweet dreams.


BOC

I am glad there was someone that was willing to help your wife.  He should be commended for his actions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:28:50 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?

Alabama, Georgia and I think there is a third one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 10:29:07 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Why would the cops let a body remain there while two guys are painting rocks white? If you are covering up a crime that has international attention, you are not going to leave the body of the victum out in broad daylight. It seems obvious the powers on that island can do a very good job of keeping information tight to their chests. No way is that a body IMO.

I agree, does not make sense.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 10:29:29 PM
LOL BTGirl...


I understand, completely. (erpppp)


 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 10:29:30 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?

Alabama, Georgia and I think there is a third one.


?? the city of Philadelphia??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 10:29:42 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?

Alabama, Georgia and I think there is a third one.

Was it Louisiana?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:30:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?

Alabama, Georgia and I think there is a third one.

Arkansas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on April 10, 2007, 10:31:27 PM
I thought it was Ga. Bama, Ark and PA. Was it only the city of Philly?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on April 10, 2007, 10:33:16 PM
thank Monks I needed that info for my Travel board battles!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 10:34:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Why would the cops let a body remain there while two guys are painting rocks white? If you are covering up a crime that has international attention, you are not going to leave the body of the victum out in broad daylight. It seems obvious the powers on that island can do a very good job of keeping information tight to their chests. No way is that a body IMO.

I agree, does not make sense.


And we have seen plenty of dead bodies hanging or draped in various places around Aruba.  Corpses are no longer a body but a "thing" in their society and are left to gawped at and photographed.  Even their animals are dumped in full view of everyone, including children  :evil:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 10:35:03 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
I thought it was Ga. Bama, Ark and PA. Was it only the city of Philly?


I believe I remember the "city counsel" passing a resolution.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:35:29 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
I thought it was Ga. Bama, Ark and PA. Was it only the city of Philly?

It was Alabama, Georgia and Arkansas.

SM had a front page of the states.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Buckeye on April 10, 2007, 10:36:00 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
I thought it was Ga. Bama, Ark and PA. Was it only the city of Philly?


I believe I remember the "city counsel" passing a resolution.


city council.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 10:36:47 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Why would the cops let a body remain there while two guys are painting rocks white? If you are covering up a crime that has international attention, you are not going to leave the body of the victum out in broad daylight. It seems obvious the powers on that island can do a very good job of keeping information tight to their chests. No way is that a body IMO.

I agree, does not make sense.


And we have seen plenty of dead bodies hanging or draped in various places around Aruba.  Corpses are no longer a body but a "thing" in their society and are left to gawped at and photographed.  Even their animals are dumped in full view of everyone, including children  :evil:  :evil:


There is that, Tibro. We are constantly horrified by the photos in the Aruban papers showing bodies. It's as if the person is no longer allowed any dignity once they are deceased.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 10:37:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
I thought it was Ga. Bama, Ark and PA. Was it only the city of Philly?

It was Alabama, Georgia and Arkansas.

SM had a front page of the states.

Yep, you are right!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 10, 2007, 10:38:03 PM
Boc,
Glad your wife got her purse back!  Yes, it is Ala, Ga and AR.  Remember Beth and Dave are from Arkansas originally.  Should have been many more!

Getting ready for bed and will check back on my way to the Monkey Bunkey to see if any new developments.  The photos are mostly such poor resolution that not much can be made of them.

Yes, would like to know where Dan got the originals.  But they could have been mailed to him or rather emailed to him by someone using a false identity so even he may not know where they came from.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on April 10, 2007, 10:39:02 PM
Thanks Monkeys! I promise to pick up the banana peels tonite! :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 10:39:58 PM
That is correct BT. I cannot remember who it was that stated that under their culture a body becomes a "thing" or an object after death.  Must give the relatives a lot of comfort - NOT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 10:41:33 PM
Joran said “if a body is found that we are in big trouble”. My brother and I said to Joran that is impossible because we had done nothing. Joran said then laughing, “Yes, yes you are right”.


JORAN KILLS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sam on April 10, 2007, 10:43:33 PM
Ok, I have just been reading, not posting., trying to catch up. I am and have always been into optical illusions. I see them everywhere. Funny but I do not see the one on the bridge of the guys nose. I do see the Joran head below or at the bars edge. I think it is possible he was photoshopped in also. Maybe Simian or Shango trying to tell us something. LOL How is that Lalas'?

Does anyone remember a story a few years ago about a bear cub up a tree they were trying to coax down. Seems like it was up there for a few days. The authorities finally shot it with a tranquilizer gun. Then they went up to retrieve it. Turned out to be a black plastic garbage bag.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 10, 2007, 10:45:20 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?


CBS NEWS

Ala. Governor Urges Aruba Boycott
Call Made On Behalf Of Missing Teen Natalee Holloway

MONTGOMERY, Ala., Nov. 8, 2005

(AP) Gov. Bob Riley called for a nationwide travel boycott of Aruba on Tuesday on behalf a missing Alabama teenager's family, who accuse the island's government of not fully cooperating with the investigation into her disappearance.

Riley asked his fellow governors to join him in urging the boycott of Aruba, where 18-year-old Natalee Holloway was last seen on May 30.

Her mother, Beth Holloway-Twitty, joined Riley at the Alabama Capitol for the boycott announcement. She contends Aruban authorities have failed to adequately investigate the possible murder of her daughter, who was with a Dutch teenager and two Surinamese brothers on the night she disappeared.

The young men were held for a time but have been released.

Aruban officials did not immediately respond Tuesday to requests for comment by The Associated Press.

©MMV The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sam on April 10, 2007, 10:46:56 PM
I forgot to say HI MONKEYS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 10, 2007, 10:47:42 PM
Hi Sam, reminds me of when we used to sit around a camp fire and see pictures in the coals.

I have to uncross my eyes and go out for a while.  BBL to check it all out.  Keep up the good work, monkeys  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 10, 2007, 10:48:28 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
I forgot to say HI MONKEYS

Hi Sam.

Goodnight everyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BTgirl on April 10, 2007, 10:49:37 PM
Hi Sam and goodnight monkeys.

Please try to figure out all this stuff in all these pictures, so all I'll have to do is read the conclusions tomorrow.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 10:50:27 PM
hi sam 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 10:52:54 PM
My brother and I asked Joran what really happened with the missing girl. Joran told us that they had gone on the beach. He took his shoes off. He walked in the water with the missing girl. Then he stepped out from the water, I say that they both came from the water. The missing girl fell asleep. We, my brother and I, tasked him how far from the water he had left the missing girl laying. Joran had said that he left the missing girl approximately a meter from the water.



MORE PROOF that K2 didnt DRIVE the KILLER home

this of course if we are to believe K2 brothers.....

which i do in this case, because i just do  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 10, 2007, 10:55:32 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Anybody remember which states passed the Boycott Aruba Bill?


FOX NEWS
April 27, 2006

Locals are quick to call the case a tragedy and say they hope Holloway -- last seen leaving a bar with three men early on May 30 -- will be found alive. But most also believe criticism about the investigation is unfair -- and they worry that the case is scaring away visitors, most of whom are Americans who patronize U.S. chain restaurants and hotels that accept U.S. dollars.

They're especially angry that cable TV crime shows echo criticism by Holloway's mother, Beth Twitty, that Aruban authorities were corrupt and incompetent, and that the governors of Arkansas, Georgia and Alabama have criticized the investigation and backed a travel boycott of Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Sam on April 10, 2007, 10:55:46 PM
Good night Tibro, San, Bt girl. and to you too Robots.
Robots you are a late night Monkey. LOL

God night all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 10:58:45 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Good night Tibro, San, Bt girl. and to you too Robots.
Robots you are a late night Monkey. LOL

God night all.


yes, my son has strep throat and influenza and tonsilitis

 :shock:

he is in good shape, goes to the gym, eats right, etc etc etc

but GERMS got him this time


he tried fighting if off for 2 days and it just wasnt going away
just got home a short time ago......

he now understands how important it is to become a GERMAPHOBIC

hheheeehehehehhehe 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:00:05 PM
Nite San and Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 11:00:55 PM
that shot of penicillin looks like it hurts


that stuff is like GLUE  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

poor baby......i was calling him "dorothy"  in the emergency room

course i was just teasing him....

BUT you got to be TOUGH  8)  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 11:02:20 PM
he asked me why i didnt get it

i said " cause i wanted BONES like IRON and BLOOD like mercury
when i was 7 ...BIRTHDAY wish


well, i got em  8)

you got to be TOUGH  :x  :x  :x  :x  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 11:05:48 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Sam"
Good night Tibro, San, Bt girl. and to you too Robots.
Robots you are a late night Monkey. LOL

God night all.


yes, my son has strep throat and influenza and tonsilitis

 :shock:

he is in good shape, goes to the gym, eats right, etc etc etc

but GERMS got him this time


he tried fighting if off for 2 days and it just wasnt going away
just got home a short time ago......

he now understands how important it is to become a GERMAPHOBIC

hheheeehehehehhehe 8)




Robots another IMPORTANT ONE-


Joran says in an ALE INTERVIEW that Paulus told him he should
stop treating girls like that. It is not right.


THIS WAS BEFORE THE "I WAS WRONG FOR LEAVING HER AT THE BEACH STORY."


How did Joran mistreat her?


What is his excuse for that?

HE HAS NONE.

He is a killer!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:09:37 PM
Night to all the monkeys that are turning in for the night.  I have given up on the pics.  I think my eyes have crossed and crossed again..does that make them normal?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 11:11:44 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Sam"
Good night Tibro, San, Bt girl. and to you too Robots.
Robots you are a late night Monkey. LOL

God night all.


yes, my son has strep throat and influenza and tonsilitis

 :shock:

he is in good shape, goes to the gym, eats right, etc etc etc

but GERMS got him this time


he tried fighting if off for 2 days and it just wasnt going away
just got home a short time ago......

he now understands how important it is to become a GERMAPHOBIC

hheheeehehehehhehe 8)




Robots another IMPORTANT ONE-


Joran says in an ALE INTERVIEW that Paulus told him he should
stop treating girls like that. It is not right.


THIS WAS BEFORE THE "I WAS WRONG FOR LEAVING HER AT THE BEACH STORY."


How did Joran mistreat her?


What is his excuse for that?

HE HAS NONE.

He is a killer!




BINGO CARPE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 11:16:42 PM
here is a LOAD of CRAP of GIGANTIC PROPORTIONS

I had called Deepak, on May 30th 2005 at approximately 03.00 am, on his mobile phone. It was May 30th 2005. I had asked Deepak how he was doing. He had told me that he was "on-line" and that he was chatting to people. I had told Deepak that the girl wouldn't listen and that she was sleeping on the beach. I asked Deepak if he would come and pick me up. Deepak further told me that he would come immediately to come and pick me up. The conversation lasted about 2 to 3 minutes. I had walked back to Natalee. She was still sleeping. I laid down next to her. At about 03.30 am Deepak came to Fisherman's Huts to pick me up. When I was sitting in the car I told Deepak that the girl was laying on the beach and that she was being annoying/irritating because she didn't want to go back to her hotel. Deepak asked me if I fucked her. I answered Deepak that I didn't because I didn't have a condom on me. Deepak also asked me what I was going to do with her. I had said to Deepak that she didn't want to go back to her hotel. I even told her that I lifted her up but that she didn't want me to bring her back to her hotel. Then Deepak said to me "don't f*** with that bitch" * that they will find her tomorrow on the beach. Then Deepak and me drove off towards home. What I can remark is that when we drove home the "Snack Truck" at "Fermins Bar" wasn't there. In the car I had....

* this is a literal translation but not the best translation. The best phrase to translate this is: "Don't bother about the bitch" or "F*** the bitch, let's go".

told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me. I had left a pair of white and blue shoes of the make "K-Swiss", size "14" on the beach. These shoes I bought in the USA.

What I also can state is that during the drive Deepak told me that he had the next day off and that he didn't need to go to work. I had told Deepak that I did have school and that I was tired.

I was dropped off at my house by Deepak on May 30th 2005 at approximately 03.45. When I was getting out I asked him if he would go "on-line" again. Deepak answered me that he would. I also told him that I would call him tomorrow. I had asked Deepak if he could pick up the shoes I left behind at the beach. Deepak told me that he would immediately go and get them. Then Deepak drove off.


1. WHY NOT GO PICK UP THE SHOES RIGHT THEN AND THERE ???
how long would that take   ...30 more seconds
 :roll: LOAD ALERT   LOAD ALERT


2. deepak immediately said he would do this and that BLAH BLAH BLAH
LOAD ALERT LOAD ALERT


3. JORAN ADMITS he wears size 14 and purchased size 14

hmmm very interesting...so why are you wearing SIZE 10 later on JERK FACE ????????????

cause maybe you kicked Natalee with your size 14 shoes and IF the body was found you didnt want to be the PUNK that WORE size 14

OHHHHHHHHHHHH  YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:21:56 PM
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:24:24 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498



 :shock:    Oh brother..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:26:25 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498

Yep, saw that earlier.  Wonder what's up with Shizaru?  That board is extreemly slow.  That's where Medleyrelay began, she should be happy there  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:26:59 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498



 :shock:    Oh brother..
Hi Angie! I know I can't beleive that shit, and she says she will be fair to all veiws YEAHHHHHHHHHH RIGHTTTTTTTT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:29:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498

Yep, saw that earlier.  Wonder what's up with Shizaru?  That board is extreemly slow.  That's where Medleyrelay began, she should be happy there  :wink:
Why did I think that Shizaru thought the three suspects were guilty, or at least Joran?! You never know. I do not know Rohn, so I have noidea about his veiws.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:30:44 PM
Hi Robots, I agree with your above post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 11:32:41 PM
hi elaine ! 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:33:36 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498



 :shock:    Oh brother..
Hi Angie! I know I can't beleive that shit, and she says she will be fair to all veiws YEAHHHHHHHHHH RIGHTTTTTTTT


  HA HA HA    :roll:  :roll:   I agree..    :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:33:52 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498

Yep, saw that earlier.  Wonder what's up with Shizaru?  That board is extreemly slow.  That's where Medleyrelay began, she should be happy there  :wink:
Why did I think that Shizaru thought the three suspects were guilty, or at least Joran?! You never know. I do not know Rohn, so I have noidea about his veiws.

I think Shizaru does believe that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:35:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498

Yep, saw that earlier.  Wonder what's up with Shizaru?  That board is extreemly slow.  That's where Medleyrelay began, she should be happy there  :wink:
Why did I think that Shizaru thought the three suspects were guilty, or at least Joran?! You never know. I do not know Rohn, so I have noidea about his veiws.

I think Shizaru does believe that.


  I thought that too when I read his posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 10, 2007, 11:35:53 PM
They were nowhere to be found. I looked for about two minutes. Then I walked over the beach to the Wyndham Hotel. On the way there I saw a lot of people. I did not go to Fisherman's Hut to see if Natalee was still lying there.

LOOK KLLER,,,,,,,no need to spend more than 2 minutes looking
you knew they were not there


SMOKESCREEN  :x


no need to see if NATALEE was there, you knew she wasnt

i hate you


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:37:21 PM
:) Robots.. Howdy Carpe.. lalas..Janet ..  Klaas  etc..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 11:38:20 PM
NOTES****

Joran:
told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me.



he says at the MARRIOTT HOTEL

NOT **** THE BEACH AT THE MARRIOTT HOTEL.


There's a big difference, and I know that Marriott has always
been a bigger piece to the puzzle than I think most people
currently believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 11:39:18 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:) Robots.. Howdy Carpe.. lalas..Janet ..  Klaas  etc..



Howdy, Angie lady! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:40:41 PM
I thought Medley is Joran's #1 supporter, thats why I guess I am confused about that, if Shizaru feels he did it, confusing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:41:13 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498


Gag me!!!  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:42:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Just popped in to check on things before bed,Also, Klaas, did you see who is a new moderator/administrater over at scrux .com, I will never go there again for info  http://www.scrux.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=498


Gag me!!!  :shock:


  Guess you need a muzzle now and not muffs  ROFL!   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:43:33 PM
Angie!!  Elaine!! did you meet out two newest monkeys?  Ado and Tiger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:43:49 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
NOTES****

Joran:
told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me.



he says at the MARRIOTT HOTEL

NOT **** THE BEACH AT THE MARRIOTT HOTEL.


There's a big difference, and I know that Marriott has always
been a bigger piece to the puzzle than I think most people
currently believe.
Do you think there was a party, in one of the rooms there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:45:18 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie!!  Elaine!! did you meet out two newest monkeys?  Ado and Tiger.
I saw ado tonight, not Tiger yet. Welcome to the cage to both of them!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 10, 2007, 11:45:45 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
I thought Medley is Joran's #1 supporter, thats why I guess I am confused about that, if Shizaru feels he did it, confusing.

Shizaru leaves his site open to all ideas so to speak.  Not many post there so not many big time arguments.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: BIGORANGECRUSH on April 10, 2007, 11:46:20 PM
Good nite Monks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie!!  Elaine!! did you meet out two newest monkeys?  Ado and Tiger.


 I saw that and said welcome to them both a little earlier  :)
Nice to have new people!   (I am a bit slow yah know lalas  :roll: )
  AND I was howling at CBB and hummingbird when I caught up earlier..

 ROFL  !!    :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:47:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie!!  Elaine!! did you meet out two newest monkeys?  Ado and Tiger.


"our"  is what I meant.       Angieitis strikes again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:47:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
I thought Medley is Joran's #1 supporter, thats why I guess I am confused about that, if Shizaru feels he did it, confusing.

Shizaru leaves his site open to all ideas so to speak.  Not many post there so not many big time arguments.
gotcha!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:48:53 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie!!  Elaine!! did you meet out two newest monkeys?  Ado and Tiger.


 I saw that and said welcome to them both a little earlier  :)
Nice to have new people!   (I am a bit slow yah know lalas  :roll: )
  AND I was howling at CBB and hummingbird when I caught up earlier..

 ROFL  !!    :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Those two were so funny.  I even showed it to my DH and he was rolling with laughter.  That was almost as funny as the time Bean blew the margins with her sig line.  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:49:06 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Angie!!  Elaine!! did you meet out two newest monkeys?  Ado and Tiger.


 I saw that and said welcome to them both a little earlier  :)
Nice to have new people!   (I am a bit slow yah know lalas  :roll: )
  AND I was howling at CBB and hummingbird when I caught up earlier..

 ROFL  !!    :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
That was so funny with those two in here last night trying to change the page to coverup the boo boo, LMAO!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 10, 2007, 11:49:30 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Good nite Monks!


Night BOC.  Sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:50:25 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Good nite Monks!
Take care BOC!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:51:08 PM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
Good nite Monks!


  Night BOC  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 10, 2007, 11:52:37 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
NOTES****

Joran:
told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me.



he says at the MARRIOTT HOTEL

NOT **** THE BEACH AT THE MARRIOTT HOTEL.


There's a big difference, and I know that Marriott has always
been a bigger piece to the puzzle than I think most people
currently believe.
Do you think there was a party, in one of the rooms there?



It is certainly a possibility. He'd partied there 1,000's of times before... crashing in rooms there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:54:16 PM
Lalas  I hadn't noticed your typo..  :)  
and ROFLMAO  at Bean and her siggy line  :) :)  

Elaine.. THAT was hilarious to read fer sure..  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
NOTES****

Joran:
told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me.



he says at the MARRIOTT HOTEL

NOT **** THE BEACH AT THE MARRIOTT HOTEL.


There's a big difference, and I know that Marriott has always
been a bigger piece to the puzzle than I think most people
currently believe.
Do you think there was a party, in one of the rooms there?



It is certainly a possibility. He'd partied there 1,000's of times before... crashing in rooms there.
I have always felt like after they left CNC's, that they attended a party, somewhere...then went to Joran's. That is just me though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 10, 2007, 11:56:00 PM
BOC

  Where is my VS?    :wink:


Title: Cowboy boots
Post by: IBE on April 10, 2007, 11:56:01 PM
still 11 pages behind in readying

But I think the man taking the videos has on  jeans and cowboy boots.. cowboy boots are thin and pointed at the toe and some slightly turn at the toe, some don't.

When you have been wearing cowboy boots for most of your life, and then go bare foot you do "walk funny" to some people on hot rocks or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 10, 2007, 11:57:15 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Lalas  I hadn't noticed your typo..  :)  
and ROFLMAO  at Bean and her siggy line  :) :)  

Elaine.. THAT was hilarious to read fer sure..  :)
Angie how are you doing with that stalker gal, is she going away? Letting your boy alone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 10, 2007, 11:57:48 PM
I'm going to go to bed pretty soon, too.  I haven't been feeling very good
for the past week or so and I think I need to start getting more rest.  I
just had schrimp and salmon for dinner, about an hour ago and am getting really tired.

I hope I didn't make any enemies tonight.  But, if that were Natalee that
is at the rocks area and if the tape can be authenticized, I would think
that would be enough to keep this case from ending up in the "cold case"
files.

That's all....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:00:23 AM
Nite Patti - hope you feel better tomorrow!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:01:44 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
I'm going to go to bed pretty soon, too.  I haven't been feeling very good
for the past week or so and I think I need to start getting more rest.  I
just had schrimp and salmon for dinner, about an hour ago and am getting really tired.

I hope I didn't make any enemies tonight.  But, if that were Natalee that
is at the rocks area and if the tape can be authenticized, I would think
that would be enough to keep this case from ending up in the "cold case"
files.

That's all....
Patti take care! No enemies, we all have differing oppinions on things. Except I do beleive that most of us here agree on 1 main thing.... JORAN DID IT!.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 12:02:07 AM
Night Patti!  No enemies just friends here.  Sweet dreams.


Title: Re: Cowboy boots
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:03:25 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
still 11 pages behind in readying

But I think the man taking the videos has on  jeans and cowboy boots.. cowboy boots are thin and pointed at the toe and some slightly turn at the toe, some don't.

When you have been wearing cowboy boots for most of your life, and then go bare foot you do "walk funny" to some people on hot rocks or not.
Hi IBE, You cutie!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 12:04:58 AM
I am going to hug Nemo now...I may forget later.  It is good to see Spooky back in the cage.  I will be hanging around in the lower threads trying to catch up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 11, 2007, 12:05:06 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Lalas  I hadn't noticed your typo..  :)  
and ROFLMAO  at Bean and her siggy line  :) :)  

Elaine.. THAT was hilarious to read fer sure..  :)
Angie how are you doing with that stalker gal, is she going away? Letting your boy alone?

 

  Well.. sorta.. my son did find out at work tonight that her and her friend went to where he works a few days ago by his manager.  They were asking for him..  :roll:   He is taking his yearbook to work with him. to show his manager in the next few days he works to see for sure if it is her.
  Description fits.   Shes already arrested for harassment..  and who knows. may get it for stalking next.  I am not a mean mom.. at all!
  My kid is no Angel either.. Id never profess him to be.  hes been working on staying on a nice clean path and this shit has to occur. Like I said before.. I wish I was 17 for about 5 minutes..  :twisted:  This bimbo ,cops told me ONLY does this to boys.. no girls.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 11, 2007, 12:07:50 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I am going to hug Nemo now...I may forget later.  It is good to see Spooky back in the cage.  I will be hanging around in the lower threads trying to catch up.


 Hugs to Nemo from me too..  :)
<I dont want written up.  :wink: >
 Not on much longer for me either... another long work day tomorrow. :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:09:12 AM
Klass, did you see the comment left under the train picture on fotolog [list=]pervert @ 2007-04-06 07:24 said :

i hope your some hot chick jummmm
[/list]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:11:59 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I am going to hug Nemo now...I may forget later.  It is good to see Spooky back in the cage.  I will be hanging around in the lower threads trying to catch up.


 Hugs to Nemo from me too..  :)
<I dont want written up.  :wink: >
 Not on much longer for me either... another long work day tomorrow. :roll:  :roll:
Good night Angie and Lalas, Angie sounds like things are getting somewhat better though, I am  glad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:12:40 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
I'm going to go to bed pretty soon, too.  I haven't been feeling very good
for the past week or so and I think I need to start getting more rest.  I
just had schrimp and salmon for dinner, about an hour ago and am getting really tired.

I hope I didn't make any enemies tonight.  But, if that were Natalee that
is at the rocks area and if the tape can be authenticized, I would think
that would be enough to keep this case from ending up in the "cold case"
files.

That's all....


Night Patti...

Why would anyone be your enemy...  :?:  :?:  :?:

You are loved.  :wink:

Feel better


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 11, 2007, 12:13:36 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Night Patti!  No enemies just friends here.  Sweet dreams.


LaLa's I know that there is a witness that has been discredited and sent
back to Columbia... but he said that he witnessed a rape at the beach
and that after the man killed the girl, he went to discard of her in the surf.
He said that when the man was gone, he took a couple things and left.
One was a used condom and the other is not mentioned.  

With all these statements that Joran has made about not having a condom and the loss of his tennis shoes, isn't it possible that this man could have been telling the truth and that he ran off with Joran's shoes?

If the man, had been truthful, and had gone to the police with the shoes;
that would explain why Joran, from the very beginning was making up
stories about leaving his shoes, having his shoes picked up by Deepak, even to the point of what size he wore... anything to distance himself from
those shoes.

You know me... I like to keep things simple and that is as good an explanation as any.  Just think what Joran would do, when returning back,
to find his shoes gone and then the condom as well....   In any other country, that would be enough for a conviction.  But not in Aruba, Joran just lies about the size of shoes he wears and claims that he didn't have sex with that girl, because he didn't have a condom and all is well in Paradise.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 11, 2007, 12:14:11 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I am going to hug Nemo now...I may forget later.  It is good to see Spooky back in the cage.  I will be hanging around in the lower threads trying to catch up.


 Hugs to Nemo from me too..  :)
<I dont want written up.  :wink: >
 Not on much longer for me either... another long work day tomorrow. :roll:  :roll:
Good night Angie and Lalas, Angie sounds like things are getting somewhat better though, I am  glad.


  We'll see Elaine..  lol  I hope so. I am not holding my breath just yet.
 I need a vacation.. I do. BAD!   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:14:23 AM
Look at this one I just popped out

It features Paulus and Nat in the casino.




http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/eeeeeterrere.png


Robots will be rippin' on Paulus in a minute!!! LOL :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 11, 2007, 12:16:28 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Look at this one I just popped out

It features Paulus and Nat in the casino.




http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/eeeeeterrere.png


Robots will be rippin' on Paulus in a minute!!! LOL :P



 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 11, 2007, 12:16:41 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Patti"
I'm going to go to bed pretty soon, too.  I haven't been feeling very good
for the past week or so and I think I need to start getting more rest.  I
just had schrimp and salmon for dinner, about an hour ago and am getting really tired.

I hope I didn't make any enemies tonight.  But, if that were Natalee that
is at the rocks area and if the tape can be authenticized, I would think
that would be enough to keep this case from ending up in the "cold case"
files.

That's all....


Night Patti...

Why would anyone be your enemy...  :?:  :?:  :?:

You are loved.  :wink:

Feel better


Carpe:

Thanks for saying that... I'm just trying to do the best I can with what I
have to work with... and find a way to find justice for Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:17:20 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Klass, did you see the comment left under the train picture on fotolog [list=]pervert @ 2007-04-06 07:24 said :

i hope your some hot chick jummmm
[/list]


Yes, LOLOL   :lol:  :lol:

Nite lala's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:18:43 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Look at this one I just popped out

It features Paulus and Nat in the casino.




http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/eeeeeterrere.png


Robots will be rippin' on Paulus in a minute!!! LOL :P
I can really see the glasses better there, and IMO it IS Paulus the sweaty-puss


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:19:34 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Patti"
I'm going to go to bed pretty soon, too.  I haven't been feeling very good
for the past week or so and I think I need to start getting more rest.  I
just had schrimp and salmon for dinner, about an hour ago and am getting really tired.

I hope I didn't make any enemies tonight.  But, if that were Natalee that
is at the rocks area and if the tape can be authenticized, I would think
that would be enough to keep this case from ending up in the "cold case"
files.

That's all....


Night Patti...

Why would anyone be your enemy...  :?:  :?:  :?:

You are loved.  :wink:

Feel better


Carpe:

Thanks for saying that... I'm just trying to do the best I can with what I
have to work with... and find a way to find justice for Natalee.



Absolutely, Patti. We all are, and we all have a slice of the pie
of what happened to poor Nat... and all of us combined together
will nail that little bastard to the doors of a jailhouse, so he doesn't
make anyone else suffer!!!!

G'nite lady :wink:
Pleasant dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:20:57 AM
Quote from: "Patti"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Patti"
I'm going to go to bed pretty soon, too.  I haven't been feeling very good
for the past week or so and I think I need to start getting more rest.  I
just had schrimp and salmon for dinner, about an hour ago and am getting really tired.

I hope I didn't make any enemies tonight.  But, if that were Natalee that
is at the rocks area and if the tape can be authenticized, I would think
that would be enough to keep this case from ending up in the "cold case"
files.

That's all....


Night Patti...

Why would anyone be your enemy...  :?:  :?:  :?:

You are loved.  :wink:

Feel better


Carpe:

Thanks for saying that... I'm just trying to do the best I can with what I
have to work with... and find a way to find justice for Natalee.
Patti, we know that and I think that you are a real sweetheart and a kind lady!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:21:27 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Look at this one I just popped out

It features Paulus and Nat in the casino.




http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/eeeeeterrere.png


Robots will be rippin' on Paulus in a minute!!! LOL :P
I can really see the glasses better there, and IMO it IS Paulus the sweaty-puss



That was the best one I have been able to pluck out so far, it is
that old, washed up, decrepit, coward .... is it not?

 :evil:  :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Patti on April 11, 2007, 12:23:02 AM
Okay... Nite all....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:24:57 AM
Nite again Patti


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 12:25:41 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Look at this one I just popped out

It features Paulus and Nat in the casino.




http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/eeeeeterrere.png


Robots will be rippin' on Paulus in a minute!!! LOL :P
I can really see the glasses better there, and IMO it IS Paulus the sweaty-puss



That was the best one I have been able to pluck out so far, it is
that old, washed up, decrepit, coward .... is it not?

 :evil:  :?:
To me it seems like it. It is creepy to see him that close to her!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: the big hammer on April 11, 2007, 12:29:25 AM
Bar Dance "Faux-tography" FP Post

Subject is more than worthy, imo.

Any status update?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 11, 2007, 12:34:53 AM
Anyone still in the cage or am I all alone?  It's skeery to be the only one in the cage late at night.

Anyway, I used to know Dan Riehl pretty well before he declared me Public Enemy #1 and I think if he would discuss his source with anybody it would be with Red.  He won't tell any of us but he might at least give Red a clue.  I wish Red would call or email and  ask him if he knows that photo has been shopped, etc. and see if he will be more open.

I thought the Cardinal Rules of protecting sources went out the window if the source burned you like this.  So first thing to do might be to convince Dan it has been shopped.

Wadda ya think?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:34:53 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Bar Dance "Faux-tography" FP Post

Subject is more than worthy, imo.

Any status update?

.

Waiting on Red and he has been swamped with "real" work the last few days.  I'm sorry it's not on the front page too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:36:15 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Anyone still in the cage or am I all alone?  It's skeery to be the only one in the cage late at night.

Anyway, I used to know Dan Riehl pretty well before he declared me Public Enemy #1 and I think if he would discuss his source with anybody it would be with Red.  He won't tell any of us but he might at least give Red a clue.  I wish Red would call or email and  ask him if he knows that photo has been shopped, etc. and see if he will be more open.

I thought the Cardinal Rules of protecting sources went out the window if the source burned you like this.  So first thing to do might be to convince Dan it has been shopped.

Wadda ya think?

.

Not sure how close Red and Dan are these days either but I'll ask Red next time I see him.  Red has been very busy.  I haven't even seen him today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 11, 2007, 12:39:50 AM
If it goes on the FP first without talking to Dan, it will make him mad and he won't tell where it came from at all.  I hope Red will discuss or email to him before putting on FP and at least see if he will open up more about the source.  He is the only one who can verify it.

So if it goes to FP and embarrasses Dan I think we can pretty well forget his divulging anything about the source.  At least that is what I think.

Who knows, maybe it would make him mad and he would tell all and blame the source?  Nah, he should have caught some of that.  We all should have but who would have thought such a thing so early on.

Klaas, any thoughts on what Jack or Blue suggested doing?  I do see the discolorations he is talking about but don't think even if what he says is true it would alter the straps on the top like that would it?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 11, 2007, 12:40:20 AM
Night all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:41:25 AM
g'night Angie! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:42:56 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
If it goes on the FP first without talking to Dan, it will make him mad and he won't tell where it came from at all.  I hope Red will discuss or email to him before putting on FP and at least see if he will open up more about the source.  He is the only one who can verify it.

So if it goes to FP and embarrasses Dan I think we can pretty well forget his divulging anything about the source.  At least that is what I think.

Who knows, maybe it would make him mad and he would tell all and blame the source?  Nah, he should have caught some of that.  We all should have but who would have thought such a thing so early on.

Klaas, any thoughts on what Jack or Blue suggested doing?  I do see the discolorations he is talking about but don't think even if what he says is true it would alter the straps on the top like that would it?

.


I haven't had a chance to look at the photo his way.  Hard to watch/moderate the forum and the front page and study photos.  Will be even harder for me after today because I have some contract work that I'm starting on tomorrow.  I'll be very busy.  Hope Red gets some time soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:43:22 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Night all.

Nite Angie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 11, 2007, 12:43:46 AM
Remember all that photoshopped stuff in that old man Maartin van der Berg's apartment?  Robin on the TV screen, things reflected in mirror that did not appear in the bed spread, things like that?

That was another creepy photoshopping job.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:46:03 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Remember all that photoshopped stuff in that old man Maartin van der Berg's apartment?  Robin on the TV screen, things reflected in mirror that did not appear in the bed spread, things like that?

That was another creepy photoshopping job.

I don't think Robin on the TV was photoshopped, I think he was actually watching it on the news.  Or a taped broadcast of the news.  Maartin is very creepy though, that's for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Anna on April 11, 2007, 12:50:59 AM
Heading for the Monkey Bunkey. . .hope I don't dream about body parts in rocks, etc.  Will turn on Art Bell so maybe will dream about being abducted by UFO's instead, LOL!

Goodnight any remaining Monkeys!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:52:26 AM
Nite Anna


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Leslie on April 11, 2007, 07:04:57 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 07:24:04 AM
Quote from: "San"
Know what makes me sick is that HKS knew he wasn't the father and he was holding this baby hostage.  JMO.


Do you think he did it because he's an opportunistic, selfish jackass or because he actually gives a hoot about the baby?

Good morning.  
You know my story.
Working and lurking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 07:30:37 AM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
I don't see it either,  although in the picture you mention a shark,  I saw what could be the shark.


Alright, I saw the shark's head.  What was labeled "feet" looked like the tail end of the shark to me.

Thanks, Carnut.  I saw the face.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 08:10:10 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/paulusfilledhisdiaper.png)



P U!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 08:29:27 AM
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
How many states passed the bill to urge citizens to boycott Aruba?

My wife had her pocket book stolen in Food City today! The Pepsi man  stocking shelves saw it happen chased the thief and kept in touch with the police via his cell phone until they caught up with the thief and arrested him! She was lucky thet she got everything back!

I offered him $100. reward after I got there and he declined! My wife contacted Pepsi and reported his remarkable deed! ii am still going to send hIm a gift for dinner at a local restaurant! that way he may take it!

SEE THERE ARE SOME GREAT HUMAN BEINGS LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!


I am so sorry that happened to Mrs. BOC!  I had my wallet stolen out of my purse which was sitting in the front of the cart many years ago when I lived in San Francisco.  Of course, I got nothing back.  Sucked big.

NEVER LEAVE YOUR PURSE IN THE BUGGY!  I always put my purse in front but I NEVER take my hand off the cart.  Snatching your wallet out of your purse is child's play.  Happens fast.  Not everybody is as lucky as Mrs. BOC!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 08:49:06 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
That is correct BT. I cannot remember who it was that stated that under their culture a body becomes a "thing" or an object after death.  Must give the relatives a lot of comfort - NOT


I thought Catholic was one of the predominant religions down there?  That doesn't seem like a particularly Catholic viewpoint.

What do I know?  Just a lapsed Lutheran here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 08:52:02 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "BIGORANGECRUSH"
How many states passed the bill to urge citizens to boycott Aruba?

My wife had her pocket book stolen in Food City today! The Pepsi man  stocking shelves saw it happen chased the thief and kept in touch with the police via his cell phone until they caught up with the thief and arrested him! She was lucky thet she got everything back!

I offered him $100. reward after I got there and he declined! My wife contacted Pepsi and reported his remarkable deed! ii am still going to send hIm a gift for dinner at a local restaurant! that way he may take it!

SEE THERE ARE SOME GREAT HUMAN BEINGS LEFT IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!


I am so sorry that happened to Mrs. BOC!  I had my wallet stolen out of my purse which was sitting in the front of the cart many years ago when I lived in San Francisco.  Of course, I got nothing back.  Sucked big.

NEVER LEAVE YOUR PURSE IN THE BUGGY!  I always put my purse in front but I NEVER take my hand off the cart.  Snatching your wallet out of your purse is child's play.  Happens fast.  Not everybody is as lucky as Mrs. BOC!

Someone stole my purse once and they went to the bank the next day trying to pretend they were me :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 11, 2007, 09:40:02 AM
Good morning friends.... :)

Someone sent me an excellent post from BFN.....a letter from a member who usually just reads....I'd like to bring it over, but it is long.....so I am going to give you the link....it starts at 1:38 a.m.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=6748.240


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 09:49:29 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good morning friends.... :)

Someone sent me an excellent post from BFN.....a letter from a member who usually just reads....I'd like to bring it over, but it is long.....so I am going to give you the link....it starts at 1:38 a.m.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=6748.240


Goodmorning all!  Mere - you have to be a member to read there:

Posted by rtst1 at BFN this morning:

I’ve only posted a few times on BFN but I’m what you might call a steady lurker.  I come here frequently to look for news and follow developments in the case…but as we all know there’s been little “news” for awhile now.  So I’ve kind of settled in to reading all the theories and speculation on the forum.  If you’ll permit an observation, in my humble opinion there are more theories floated here about what happened to Natalee than there are about how the dinosaurs disappeared from the Earth.  Frankly it’s all a bit confusing for this reader.  And way too complicated.

So in an attempt to seriously simplify things...  

1.  This young lady disappeared with three boys in a car and no one ever saw her again.

2.  The boys changed their stories many times, especially early in the investigation…which is enough to make most reasonable people distrust and suspect them.

3.  One of these boy’s father was politically connected, and very tied in with the legal system in Aruba.

4.  It seems fairly logical to believe that a father could try to protect his teenage son…even if that son did something very wrong.

5.  It seems equally logical that a person with friends in the criminal justice system might receive some kind of preferential treatment…heck, that could even happen here in the USA, right?

6.  Do I believe there’s a conspiracy…or some of the other more complicated theories I read about here every day?  Not really.  I think you have a few teenage boys who did something very wrong and a father with friends in all the right places trying to protect them.  Why would anyone put together some kind of complicated conspiracy against an ordinary young girl from Alabama?
 
7.  I do think it’s possible that some of the Aruban authorities tried to do a favor for a friend who had a child in trouble.  And I’ll bet they believed their pal Paul’s son was “A good kid” who “wouldn’t do anything bad to a young American girl”.  So perhaps they tried to “deflect” some of the attention away from Joran and the Kalpoes.  And if they did do a friend a favor, it just might have been too politically embarrassing to admit that after the fact…especially when it turned out that their friend’s child might not have been so innocent.
 
8.  The best place to start investigating this case is with the three boys who were known to see Natalee last.  But since they weren’t forthcoming in the first place with all their many statements about what happened, where they went and where they left her off,why on earth should anyone believe their most recent tales?

9.  Is it possible someone else is involved?  You bet.  And if so, isn't it likely that the boys who were seen with her last could name the person or persons who saw her after them?  Seems logical…but unless I'm forgetting something they haven’t, which kind of forces your focus back to the boys, or possibly even the father, or someone else who is a close friend…but almost any of those options would also seem to involve, implicate and most likely also incriminate the original three…J2K.

10.  Should the kids from Natalee’s school have stayed on the island when she didn’t show up for the plane in the morning?  I don’t think so.  First of all kids do miss planes when they’re away on their own.  It happens.  And honestly, I think most kids would be concerned that their parents would be upset if they missed that plane and ended up having an extended stay on the island…especially to give statements in a police station.  Furthermore, my guess would be that none of them really thought at that time that she missed the plane for anything nearly as serious or sinister as what this whole thing actually turned into.  

11.  Did the police bungle the investigation?  Oh yeah, you bet they did, early and often.  And I still can’t understand why it took them so long to take J2K into custody…except perhaps for the intervention of PVS...and perhaps some well meaning but misguided friends of the family.
 
12.  I think it’s reasonable to assume that people who do political favors for their friends seldom admit to doing that…even under far more innocuous circumstances than this tragedy turned out to be.  That would explain a number of small and big things...like why someone originally limited a search warrant of Chateau VDS...and why, more recently, another legal eagle had some harsh words in public for Paul about his settlement.

13.  Do these influentials realize now, after the fact, that they made a mistake by helping their friend?  I would think so but what are they going to do at this point?  Even if they now think that JVDS might have committed this crime, and maybe even with some help from his father after the fact.  Would they implicate themselves in some kind of cover up?  Admit to having used their power in the wrong way?  Say they screwed up?  Formed a conspiracy?  Seems unlikely that they'd admit any of those things, doesn’t it?

I’m posting tonight because it seems to me that the discussion on the forum might be deteriorating a bit…kind of in sync with the case against the boys who saw Natalee last.  As the case against Joran and his friends seems to be falling fall apart, there are so many complicated theories, egos, tempers and frustrations on display here…on a forum with a nice group of well meaning people who have seen friendlier days together.

Listen folks, I’m not an expert on this subject like some of the loyal posters here are.  I can’t tell you what all the initials stand for, or give you from memory the names of everyone who’s ever been hauled in as a suspect, or draw you a map of the island with all its landmarks.  

But I do care.  It’s way too easy to imagine this happening to one of my own daughters.  And it’s really infuriating that this case wasn’t properly investigated by the Aruban authorities in the first place.

I would urge you all to get back on the subject…maybe even go back to the beginning where the case was bungled in the first place.  Try to keep it simple…this is about a lovely ordinary teenage girl from Alabama and a few out-of-control boys.  In my opinion, if there was a cover up it probably wasn’t actually a conspiracy.  Just a misguided display of friendship by people who should have known better…or didn’t think it would come to all this.  Go back to the boys...

To all the moderators, especially Debbie.  I think you all have done a great job here so far.  Do me a favor and please don’t toss me off for this incredibly long post.  Perhaps I don’t know as much as the regulars…but this forum is supposed to be about opinions, right?  Given all the stress here tonight, I just thought it might be helpful to have another more simplistic point of view.

Peace.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Mere on April 11, 2007, 09:59:23 AM
Sorry....did not think about that before giving the link....just thought it was well written....sorry Debbie :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:04:47 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Sorry....did not think about that before giving the link....just thought it was well written....sorry Debbie :?

Mere I don't think BFN minds you bringing the post over.  It was a good post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:09:25 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/charliefesddtjpeg.jpg)



ah, the truth of the undulating dumptruck alcoholic with
his bride of FRONK-EN-STEEN finally spills forth.



I am so glad I was there to catch. Enquiring minds wanted to know.


-------


charlierat  PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:51 am         

K_Meine wrote:
Yes the demise of Natalee. I just happen to think Natalee is dead and nor do I need a body to prove that. Some people don't believe in anything until it is presented to them as a proof and that is OK too. "To each his own" as they say.

I mis-read your post. Since I'm on the ATA & AHATA payrolls I automatically assume that everything is an attack on the lovely island of Aruba. Elaine pointed out my error last night.


ROCK ON
CHUCK

u quantam ass load.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:11:01 AM
The TROOF ...

Shall set you free, brudda man.


 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:18:17 AM

OMG I've been blocked from commenting on Klaasend's video Laughing Fit 1
I guess that means CharlieRat is blocked too. Those of you who
aren't blocked yet should drop a few words onto that video


By the way Klaas... ALL COMMENTS on your YOU TUBE VIDS can

set to off, to keep away ankle biting, POS REFUGEE morons who revel in


supporting murderers, like Joran Van der sloot - The murdering / rapist

Butcher of Oranjestad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 10:19:15 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Look at this one I just popped out

It features Paulus and Nat in the casino.




http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/eeeeeterrere.png


Robots will be rippin' on Paulus in a minute!!! LOL :P
I can really see the glasses better there, and IMO it IS Paulus the sweaty-puss



That was the best one I have been able to pluck out so far, it is
that old, washed up, decrepit, coward .... is it not?

 :evil:  :?:


Carpe ... prior to the public revelation of the casino recording in March, 2006 ... Beth Twitty had already stated that Paulus Van der Sloot had met Natalee.  I suspect that Natalee's friends who were with her at the Black Jack table had revealed this information.

It should be remembered that official witness statements of both Joran and Paulus as well of the Greta/Joran transcript ... have Paulus leaving the POKER table half way through the tournament for home.  This occured prior to Joran going to the BLACK JACK table where the encounter with Natalee and her friends took place.

Lies are created to cover the truth.  Why are Joran and Paulus compelled to cover up a Paulus and Natalee connection?

Janet


Katherine (Madison) Whatley
FBI Statement
July 12, 2005

After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


Beth Twitty
'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
September 19, 2005

HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ..... I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.  


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:20:22 AM
WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


GOOD MOANIN' EVERYBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODY!!!!!


(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JORANNNNN-1.png)


justice 4 natalee ann

let us get it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:20:36 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"

OMG I've been blocked from commenting on Klaasend's video Laughing Fit 1
I guess that means CharlieRat is blocked too. Those of you who
aren't blocked yet should drop a few words onto that video


By the way Klaas... ALL COMMENTS on your YOU TUBE VIDS can

set to off, to keep away ankle biting, POS REFUGEE morons who revel in


supporting murderers, like Joran Van der sloot - The murdering / rapist

Butcher of Oranjestad.

I have certain video comments set to approve first.  I block and delete RU and FOB comments.  If it becomes too big a problem I'll turn comments off.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:25:53 AM
Hey ANITA

you old windbag


READ JANET'S POST ABOVE...


her posts always kick a lot of booty!!!


Anita, your husband was out selecting the "piece of tail" that he and your
little butcher were gonna rape that night. All the while... you were
chewing the cud in Holland with a cowbell around your neck!!!

ANITA, how does that make you feel! YOUR HUSBAND IS A PIG!!!!

oink oink snnnnnort


ya know,


I'm JUST SAYINNNNN

(http://www.rgj.com/blogs/film/uploaded_images/Cowbell-729362.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:27:04 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"

OMG I've been blocked from commenting on Klaasend's video Laughing Fit 1
I guess that means CharlieRat is blocked too. Those of you who
aren't blocked yet should drop a few words onto that video


By the way Klaas... ALL COMMENTS on your YOU TUBE VIDS can

set to off, to keep away ankle biting, POS REFUGEE morons who revel in


supporting murderers, like Joran Van der sloot - The murdering / rapist

Butcher of Oranjestad.

I have certain video comments set to approve first.  I block and delete RU and FOB comments.  If it becomes too big a problem I'll turn comments off.   :wink:




KEEEWL! I knew you'd have it handled some way.


The Klaas-meister. 8)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:28:01 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


GOOD MOANIN' EVERYBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODY!!!!!



justice 4 natalee ann

let us get it.

Good Morning Carpe and everyone else. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 10:30:19 AM
:wink:

G'mornin San


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 10:48:53 AM
Morning everyone.  I enjoyed that post from BFN.  Thanks Mere and Klaas.  I did however begin thinking about what that poster said.  I too had my doubts about a conspiracy on Aruba.  I even doubted it when I began my Shango quest.  It seems so impossible that an entire island could have been involved.  Silently I held my tongue when some would ridicule me and others about not keeping it simple.  I even tried to go back to the KISS theory myself. It was just more than I could comprehend that more than 3 guys in the paryting mood were involved.  That is until I heard Jossy Mansur.  Now, I am back to leaning toward a massive corruption and cover up that is out of control and only a handful are trying to fight the good fight for justice.

Is Carpe around?  I have another video question.  No it's not about shoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tylergal on April 11, 2007, 10:52:10 AM
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 11, 2007, 10:52:17 AM
Good morning all.
Sorry I didn't announce when I was going to log of yesterday evening

To those who welcomed me to the board yesterday evening after I was logged of and was sleeping, HI!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:53:35 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.

Sander

Hi Tylergal!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 10:54:32 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.


Tylergal! So good to see you. Did you know that your email keeps returning my emails....are you mad at me?   :roll:

Sander Gottenbos


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:55:19 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.

Sander.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:57:12 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.


Tylergal! So good to see you. Did you know that your email keeps returning my emails....are you mad at me?   :roll:

Sander Gottenbos

I would return your emails also :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 11:00:35 AM
Carpe
I have been perusing your photobucket account.  It's so huge that my computer slows down to a crawl  but I did see a photo that I was wondering about.  There is a pic of a car sitting in the distance...just watching things at the lighthouse.  It's not the one where the people are in the car driving up to the scene..it's the one where the car is just sitting off in the distance. What do we know about that car?  Is it the same car at the one that possible has Cromvoit or Paulus or Deepak or one of them in?  I know you will understand my question and know just how to find it for me. TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:02:42 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Morning everyone.  I enjoyed that post from BFN.  Thanks Mere and Klaas.  I did however begin thinking about what that poster said.  I too had my doubts about a conspiracy on Aruba.  I even doubted it when I began my Shango quest.  It seems so impossible that an entire island could have been involved.  Silently I held my tongue when some would ridicule me and others about not keeping it simple.  I even tried to go back to the KISS theory myself. It was just more than I could comprehend that more than 3 guys in the paryting mood were involved.  That is until I heard Jossy Mansur.  Now, I am back to leaning toward a massive corruption and cover up that is out of control and only a handful are trying to fight the good fight for justice.

Is Carpe around?  I have another video question.  No it's not about shoes.



Yeah, morning to you Lalas...

If I know it, I'll answer... shoot! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 11:05:26 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.


Tylergal! So good to see you. Did you know that your email keeps returning my emails....are you mad at me?   :roll:

Sander Gottenbos

I would return your emails also :lol:  :lol:


San! You wicked woman! :lol:  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:12:16 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Carpe
I have been perusing your photobucket account.  It's so huge that my computer slows down to a crawl  but I did see a photo that I was wondering about.  There is a pic of a car sitting in the distance...just watching things at the lighthouse.  It's not the one where the people are in the car driving up to the scene..it's the one where the car is just sitting off in the distance. What do we know about that car?  Is it the same car at the one that possible has Cromvoit or Paulus or Deepak or one of them in?  I know you will understand my question and know just how to find it for me. TIA




The size of my PHOTOBUCKET dumps are an issue

I have about 1,000 .png graphics in each. Which slows sometimes

even the nicest of computers to a crawl.


A WAY AROUND THIS - TO DEAL WITH IT, and make things faster

is download the "FLOCK" Browser that is from Photobucket

and a free download.

link here:

http://www.flock.com/


It's just another browser that's all.

It's quick and easy to get loaded, and my Photobucket viewed
through that is MUCH MUCH FASTER, and not as frustrating.




The car or SUV is at a standstill watching the mini A.L.E. convoy
head out to the rocks.

I believe the cam people are

1. Ed Roos "Prs. of Chamber of Commerce"
2. His wife (in select videos)


Van crom voirt in my belief was (in my mind) at THE ROCKS #38

that day. I don't believe he was the camera guy, but I haven't eliminated

the possibility altogether. You cartainly could very well be right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:14:42 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/FROGGYDARENFRO1.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 11, 2007, 11:14:46 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What is Koan's brother's name?  It was his phone that Natalee used to get the phone call off.  He lost the phone.


Morning Tyler, and good to see you.

Sander is his name, and yes he said he lost his phone.

But - for what it's worth - Beth and Dave have stated in no uncertain terms that there was no phone call. The "William" call was from a Florida area code and there was no "human vocalization" on it. That was the call that C Croes listened to. It apparently was an accidental call. The phone owner was contacted and knew nothing about it. This is one thing they were able to have analyzed and tracked down by U.S. authorities, I'm guessing maybe FBI.

No "I don't know these people" or "Are you calling home?" ...

Beth was quite insistent about it, too. I say that because if there was a chance that there was evidentiary value about the call, I imagine she would have just declined to answer the question.

But this just keeps coming up. Do you know of some other alleged phone call from that night or thereabouts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 11:20:31 AM
Good morning, all.  

Was thinking about Janet's post regarding Madison's 302 mentioning the older man, who I am also convinced was PVDS.  Made me wonder how many locals were in any of the casinos, bars & tourist attractions.   I know I have been oblivious to this possibility on my vacations.  Like a potential robber casing out someone's home....how unsuspecting most of us would be.  Gives me the creeps.  If there is video tape, also wondering how many other baiting scenarioss were going on simultaneously on the island where locals would be recognized by officials on the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:21:28 AM
Hey Me Monks,


I think Charlie is a paid for ATA/AHATA fraudulent hack.


I think there is a possibility of finding him in this member list.

Help me pick it apart? :wink:


http://forum.aruba.com/memberlist.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 11:25:05 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hey Me Monks,


I think Charlie is a paid for ATA/AHATA fraudulent hack.


I think there is a possibility of finding him in this member list.

Help me pick it apart? :wink:


http://forum.aruba.com/memberlist.php


No Charlierat yet but I did find this interresting:

Rogier  
ATA representative

Isn't Rogier what Roger from Scux called himself in the beginning?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 11:25:47 AM
MsMarple
Let me ask you this...if such a phone call existed and there was evidence of "other" voices... not Natalee's and these voices had already been identified and the family knew who they were and the time of the call...would you at the risk of exposing a critical piece of the puzzle admit on national television that all was legit and that call happened?  I don't know.  If I were in that situation I would certainly lie in order to maintain the integrity of the situation if it would in any way bring justice for my child. JMO


BTW where did that phone call story originate?  On RWV? Again?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tylergal on April 11, 2007, 11:27:44 AM
No, not sure why the e-mails would be returned.  I have had problems with my server since AT&T merged again with the baby bells.  Hmmm, that is very strange, that more than one would be sent back.  No, you are not in my "ignore mails."  Have no idea why it is doing that.  I thought you were all mad at me and would not answer my e-mails.  So I quit mailing.

Ms. Marple, isn't it funny that it was stated on TV that a phone call occurred, but later it was denied.  What's with that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:31:23 AM
u may be on to something > rogier


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 11:31:29 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Good morning, all.  

Was thinking about Janet's post regarding Madison's 302 mentioning the older man, who I am also convinced was PVDS.  Made me wonder how many locals were in any of the casinos, bars & tourist attractions.   I know I have been oblivious to this possibility on my vacations.  Like a potential robber casing out someone's home....how unsuspecting most of us would be.  Gives me the creeps.  If there is video tape, also wondering how many other baiting scenarioss were going on simultaneously on the island where locals would be recognized by officials on the island.




Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:05 pm
The dice throwers know
the maze of the rave
and the fly that entered the trap

DirtyHand is the key
He walks in many circles


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 11:31:38 AM
I noticed the Rogier, also....

There are only a handful of membrs listed who have actually posted, is another thing noticed.  Most have '0'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 11:35:19 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hey Me Monks,


I think Charlie is a paid for ATA/AHATA fraudulent hack.


I think there is a possibility of finding him in this member list.

Help me pick it apart? :wink:


http://forum.aruba.com/memberlist.php


If that is the case what does that say for the credibility of those videos?  Does that mean it's all a trick played on use unsuspecting bloggers? Just wondering out loud.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 11:39:33 AM
Was ATA initiated early 2006?  So far memberships seem to be March/April 06.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 11:41:34 AM
Correction...see some from Feb, 06....also some from a few weeks ago...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on April 11, 2007, 11:46:39 AM
Good Morning Monkeys...Good to see you all

Hi Tylergal, nice to see you here...Hope all is well.

Lala's - I agree with you.  I think there is corruption and cover up.  I think in the beginning, it was simple.  But IMO Paulus called in some favors, possibly misleading them, and something simple became too complicated.  If the truth was found out, alot of heads would roll.  Natalee disapeared close to the election, didn't she?  Couldn't have something like this coming out so close to elections.  I think the whole thing snow balled.  When the favors were done, it was too late to turn back and more and more had to be done to cover up.

IMO, Poppa probably called his friends, saying J is in a little trouble, nothing of his doing of course, and I could use a little help, it is nothing really....  And of course he could count on Van der Stratten to do whatever.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:51:17 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hey Me Monks,


I think Charlie is a paid for ATA/AHATA fraudulent hack.


I think there is a possibility of finding him in this member list.

Help me pick it apart? :wink:


http://forum.aruba.com/memberlist.php


If that is the case what does that say for the credibility of those videos?  Does that mean it's all a trick played on use unsuspecting bloggers? Just wondering out loud.



Hey Lalas,

I was having two separate thoughts

the videos, do not connect in anyway to Charlie, I think.

In fact, that weenie probably couldn't even work a video camera, and from the looks of his tie-dye shirt, that might be all for the better with him.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:52:59 AM
G'mornin Kimmi :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 11:53:45 AM
http://forum.aruba.com/member.php?u=247

newest member, charlierat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 11:55:31 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I noticed the Rogier, also....

There are only a handful of membrs listed who have actually posted, is another thing noticed.  Most have '0'.


I see charlierat's name but it says he joined today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 11:57:09 AM
A little BOIDY

told me that the forum was set up mainly

for personal messaging & not POSTING like

a normal message board has posts. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 11, 2007, 11:57:20 AM
Page 1 of 6     1     2   3     >     Last »     
Showing results 1 to 30 of 166
Search took 0.06 seconds. Aruba Forums: Members List    Search Members
User Name Reverse Sort Order    Instant Messaging    Posts    Avatar
ACT
ATA representative
      0    
Adriana Boischio
ATA representative
      0    
ahata
ATA representative
      0    
AHATA I
ATA representative
      0    
Amazonia
ATA representative
      0    
amy
ATA representative
      0    
anant.joshi@marriott.com
Junior Member
      0    
Andy Lee
Junior Member
      0    
Angelica
ATA representative
      0    
Angelo
ATA representative
   Send a message via MSN to Angelo    0    
Annie
ATA representative
      0    
antoinette
ATA representative
      0    
Aruba Gastronomic Associa
ATA representative
      0    
ata argentina
ATA representative
      0    
ATA Venezuela
ATA representative
      0    
ata1
ATA representative
      0    
atabrasil
ATA representative
   Send a message via MSN to atabrasil    0    
atacanada
Junior Member
      0    
avan370
ATA representative
      0    
Bob Connolly
ATA representative
      26    
bstanley
ATA representative
      0    
buddy
ATA representative
      0    
camilo muyale
ATA representative
      0    
Caresse
ATA representative
      0    
Castro Perez
ATA representative
      0    
cbauser
ATA representative
      0    
CBS Aruba
ATA representative
      0    
CEI
ATA representative
      0    
charlierat
Junior Member

      0    
charlotte de kort
ATA representative
      0    
Showing results 1 to 30 of 166
Page 1 of 6    1    2   3    >    Last »    

     
Forum Jump
User Control PanelPrivate MessagesSubscriptionsWho's OnlineSearch ForumsForums Home Aruba's public discussion forums    General Forum

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:53 PM.

Contact Us - Aruba Homepage - Archive - Top


If you have any specific questions about Aruba Travel, Hotels, or Resorts
please call us toll-free in the USA at 1-800-TO-ARUBA, or click here to contact us.
Home * Marketing * Statistics * Press Room * Gallery * E-Corner
Produced by sigma-ic.com  *  All Rights Reserved © 2005-2006 Government of Aruba
Website Disclaimer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 12:01:31 PM
My guess is Charlierat was reading here and did that on purpose.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 12:02:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hey Me Monks,


I think Charlie is a paid for ATA/AHATA fraudulent hack.


I think there is a possibility of finding him in this member list.

Help me pick it apart? :wink:


http://forum.aruba.com/memberlist.php


No Charlierat yet but I did find this interresting:

Rogier  
ATA representative

Isn't Rogier what Roger from Scux called himself in the beginning?  :wink:


Klaas ... if "Roger" was paid by the ATA/AHATA it would go a long ways in explaining how the Deepak/Skeeter recording came into his possession.  It would also go a long ways to assist in comprehending why this guy had the backing of Julie Renfro as well as many who posting at RU.

BTW ... in the signature list that Roger attached to his open Oprah letter ... Charlierat identifies himself as Charles Ratcliff.

Janet
 

Roger
http://www.scrux.com/discuss/viewtopic.php?t=118
January 30, 2006

I only know what I have been told. I received the recording directly from the Aruban Police Department. I was told that it is exactly what was provided to the NFI (Netherlands Forensic Institute) and verified as having not been manipulated in any way.

<snipped>

Some people have speculated that I probably got this from a defense attorney or maybe one of the Aruban public relations groups. I did not get a copy from any of those sources. I simply would not have hosted the recording if it had come from anyone other than the proper authority. Receiving this directly from the Aruban Police provided me assurance and confidence that it was exactly what they maintained it to be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:05:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
My guess is Charlierat was reading here and did that on purpose.


precisely. It is his style. (none)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 11, 2007, 12:06:35 PM
Well, we all know that Renfro has seen the dossier and the tape.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:09:11 PM
Hey Charlie,

you walloping butt jiggler...

CAN U GET ME Ed PAPITO Comemencia ON THE LINE????

Paulus Van der sloot wants his sunglasses back that

Papi Butterfly friggin stole while removing Natalee's clothes out of the back. You LOSER.
8)

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/joranscarrtrete.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:10:38 PM
(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/CommenciaPapito.jpg) :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:14:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
My guess is Charlierat was reading here and did that on purpose.


It was a web trap laid out for that loser, and like clockwork...


Thanks for flying MONKEY AIR

Chuck


enjoy your complimentary Monkey Nutz  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 12:28:59 PM
Why do we care about charlierat?  Can someone remind me?

(If his hometown is so terrific, why isn't he still there?)  

And that poor woman standing next to him?  Does she have anything to do with the disappearance?  

I'm just asking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on April 11, 2007, 12:34:22 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I noticed the Rogier, also....

There are only a handful of membrs listed who have actually posted, is another thing noticed.  Most have '0'.


I see charlierat's name but it says he joined today.



sounds like a poster Cat is gonna eat right up...or bat around????

welcome new monkeys...post away....we are all ears ( and tails)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 11, 2007, 12:34:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
MsMarple
Let me ask you this...if such a phone call existed and there was evidence of "other" voices... not Natalee's and these voices had already been identified and the family knew who they were and the time of the call...would you at the risk of exposing a critical piece of the puzzle admit on national television that all was legit and that call happened?  I don't know.  If I were in that situation I would certainly lie in order to maintain the integrity of the situation if it would in any way bring justice for my child. JMO


BTW where did that phone call story originate?  On RWV? Again?


And Tylergal wrote:
Quote
Ms. Marple, isn't it funny that it was stated on TV that a phone call occurred, but later it was denied. What's with that.


I'm just reiterating what Beth said at that October 2006 meeting. "NO human vocalization." Possible wind noises, and screech-sounding noises, but NO words. (So possibly Yes a monkey, but also possibly any number of birds, including screech owls ... apparently they never quite nailed what the noise was.)

She reminded that she was a speech therapist and "trained to detect traces of human words" ... and in that setting, she certainly could have just said, "Yes, there was that call, but we've been advised not to comment about it."

Art Wood also chimed in on it. He's the one who talked specifically about the kinds of noises.

I think that initially they hoped that it was from her, and C Croes was interviewed by Greta about it, but then it lead to nowhere.

And it indirectly came up again during that same meeting, when someone asked about the "blue-eyed Dutch boy" ... very emphatic, NO PHONE CALLS TO OR FROM NATALEE during the trip - not even attempted calls that they know of. And I think I do remember hearing Beth say that on TV ...

Of course, I don't know - I'm just sayin' - she sounded pretty sure about it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:35:04 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Why do we care about charlierat?  Can someone remind me?

(If his hometown is so terrific, why isn't he still there?)  

And that poor woman standing next to him?  Does she have anything to do with the disappearance?  

I'm just asking.


peaches...

you're right, we should  not. my bad!

....


rumor has it, when Joran got to the casino...

the woman above sat on Paulus Van der sloot and

broke his glasses. :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:35:50 PM
hiya FOM!

good day to ya, friend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on April 11, 2007, 12:37:58 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Good Morning Monkeys...Good to see you all

Hi Tylergal, nice to see you here...Hope all is well.

Lala's - I agree with you.  I think there is corruption and cover up.  I think in the beginning, it was simple.  But IMO Paulus called in some favors, possibly misleading them, and something simple became too complicated.  If the truth was found out, alot of heads would roll.  Natalee disapeared close to the election, didn't she?  Couldn't have something like this coming out so close to elections.  I think the whole thing snow balled.  When the favors were done, it was too late to turn back and more and more had to be done to cover up.

IMO, Poppa probably called his friends, saying J is in a little trouble, nothing of his doing of course, and I could use a little help, it is nothing really....  And of course he could count on Van der Stratten to do whatever.




I agree........heads are still waiting to roll tho..too many people know too much


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 12:39:44 PM
CHARLES RATCLIFF AKA CHARLIE RAT

http://www.aruba.com/phpNews/wmview.php?ArtID=785

November 20, 2006 - 18:02
Charlie Ratcliff Returns to Aruba

Charlie Ratcliff is a special Aruba visitor. In his own words he explains it the following: Friday, November 17th was my 50th birthday. On this date in 1956, I was born in the Lago Community Hospital in Seroe Colorado. I lived here on Aruba until 1972, when my father retired from Lago. I have not been back to Aruba since then until now.

I wanted to come back many times over but there was always a reason why I couldn’t. Mostly it was because I couldn’t afford the trip. But now things have worked out and I am here to celebrate my birthday on the island of my birth.

I guess I should talk about how much things have changed. To say Aruba is all grown up would be an understatement. The west end of the island is hard to recognize. The last time I was here, the airport terminal was on the south side of the runway and the bridge over Spanish Lagoon that replace the low bridge has just opened. And I miss the banana boats on the Oranjestad waterfront. But I am proud of the progress. The island looks great! And I walked around Oranjestad yesterday (after the rain quit and the water in the streets went down) and I knew exactly where I was; I was home! I can’t tell you how good it is to hear Papiamento being spoken after all these years. I was never fluent in the language but I used to be able to understand it a bit. If it’s true what they say about use it or lose it, well, I lost it. I couldn’t make out a word of it but it was still music to my ears. I recognized stores as I walked down Caya Betico Croes (which was Nassaustraat during my first go-round) and Wilhelminastraat looked very familiar. No doubt about it, I am home.

Yesterday I was lazy and did nothing at all. But today or maybe Tuesday, I’m going to San Nicolas and Seroe Colorado and spend the day. That is going to be a very emotional day for me. I have talked to some friends who tell me that the house I used to live in is still there. And of course Rodgers Beach is still there.

So if you see a middle aged man with a big smile on his face wandering aimlessly around San Nicolas and Seroe Colorado (away from the tourist sites) over the next few days, come say hello, it’s probably me.

I return to the States on Wednesday. I presently live in (of all places) Birmingham, Alabama. But I’ll be back. In the meantime, you can know that Aruba has an outspoken ambassador in Alabama. Until my next trip home, Aruba, dushi tera!

Charlie is seen here with his internet bulletin board friends, at the Waterfront Crabhouse in town where he experienced some Aruban hospitality and deliciously fresh coconut crusted mahi mahi, chased by a to-live-for key lime pie.

Charlie whose internet BB handle is Charlie Rat, is active on ww.visitaruba.com and www.aruba.com answering questions about the island and being helpful in general. His patriotism was sparked, he admits last year when Aruba’s name was smeared in the international media. He was one of the island’s loudest and most-active defenders.

Have fun on your native island! We can’t wait to read your trip report.



TRIP REPORT
Part 1
http://tripreports.visitaruba.com/dynamic/servlet/ReportDetails?CAT_ID=14&ARTICLE_ID=1252

Part 2
http://tripreports.visitaruba.com/dynamic/servlet/ReportDetails?CAT_ID=14&ARTICLE_ID=1253

Part 3
http://tripreports.visitaruba.com/dynamic/servlet/ReportDetails?CAT_ID=14&ARTICLE_ID=1254

Part 4
http://tripreports.visitaruba.com/dynamic/servlet/ReportDetails?CAT_ID=14&ARTICLE_ID=1257


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on April 11, 2007, 12:39:52 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hey Charlie,

you walloping butt jiggler...

CAN U GET ME Ed PAPITO Comemencia ON THE LINE????

Paulus Van der sloot wants his sunglasses back that

Papi Butterfly friggin stole while removing Natalee's clothes out of the back. You LOSER.
8)

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/joranscarrtrete.jpg)





CARPE I LOVE U :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 11, 2007, 12:40:38 PM
I wonder if Ed Comemencia is Ed Smith?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on April 11, 2007, 12:43:47 PM
has there been any new news??   whatever happened w/ the Deepak lawsuit against Dr. Phil'?

i have been away a bit.......ty


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 12:49:11 PM
Thanks, tamikosmom....we were aware of CRat's trip, his identity & hisory for some time.  He posted here at SM at one time...left on bad terms, iirc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 12:55:54 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
has there been any new news??   whatever happened w/ the Deepak lawsuit against Dr. Phil'?

i have been away a bit.......ty



FOM, I think Deepak & the Dr. Phil thing is coming up...

but it has been in a holding pattern, and real quiet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 01:00:30 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
I wonder if Ed Comemencia is Ed Smith?



Justins


imo

They are two totally separate individuals.


Ed 'PAPITO' Comemencia   / ALE

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/CommenciaPapito.jpg





Ed "Smith" Roos -- Chamber Of Commerce Pres of Aruba


http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g130/arubapictures1/CCCCCCCCCCCC.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: justinsmama on April 11, 2007, 01:06:11 PM
That last photo nearly blinded me, Carpe! How 'bout some warning next time?!  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 01:07:05 PM
My comments on Charlierat...those that were here when he first arrived at SM will remember that Tylergal...yes the eagle-eyed poster for SM knew from the very beginning...she pegged him right off the bat.  He was planted here to do just what he did at the time.  Little did he know that all of us are here for a bigger cause and that is finding justice for Natalee.  My 2 cents.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on April 11, 2007, 01:09:22 PM
TY carpe----

be good monkeys..... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 01:09:48 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
That last photo nearly blinded me, Carpe! How 'bout some warning next time?!  8)



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 01:10:11 PM
High five, Lala's.  

That book is coming in handy as times wears on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 01:10:54 PM
bye FOM, I love you too, mannnn 8)



---

Justins, ROOS has a face for radio broadcasting! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on April 11, 2007, 01:17:38 PM
Quote from: carpe noctem
bye FOM, I love you too, mannnn 8)


i wish i werre here more...i know i miss alot of good stuff...u guys rock....
my motherboard is still going...just has not gone in the trash yet..... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 01:19:55 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
High five, Lala's.  

That book is coming in handy as times wears on.


So true! Hope you are feeling fine today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 01:28:25 PM
CARPE - just to clarify.  Why do you believe Ed Roos is Ed Smith?  Other than the first name Ed do you have a good reason to believe it?  Is it a guess or do you have more information on it?

To be honest, I would suspect Ed Smith to be a much younger person.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 01:37:38 PM
It's all relative, Lala's.  I feel pretty good but it's rainy and chilly out so I'm achy.  Probably my age rather than cancer.   Oh well.

It's a good day on daisy side of the dirt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Peaches on April 11, 2007, 01:39:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
CARPE - just to clarify.  Why do you believe Ed Roos is Ed Smith?  Other than the first name Ed do you have a good reason to believe it?  Is it a guess or do you have more information on it?

To be honest, I would suspect Ed Smith to be a much younger person.


I'm suspecting with ya!  I don't think an older person would think of making a video of the situation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 01:48:10 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Thanks, tamikosmom....we were aware of CRat's trip, his identity & hisory for some time.  He posted here at SM at one time...left on bad terms, iirc.


I am of the opinion that many who place themselves on Natalee forums are paid advocates of the "powers that be" in Aruba.  They are given a mission to uphold Aruba as a tourist destination; to support the actions of the investigative team by quoting a personal interpretation of Dutch Law; distance Paulus and Joran from being implicated in the events that encompass that fateful morning as well as discredit Natalee Holloway and her family ... especially her amazing mother who vows to be the voice of her daughter for as long as it takes.

I have learned that under Dutch Law there is no provision that affords the immediate family of a suspect legal protection if he/she was to obstruct an investigation.  However ... an Aruban attorney who is paid by the ATA implies just that to the American people.

Janet


Karin Janssen
'The Abrams Report'
June 29, 2005

JANSSEN: .... And secondly, the father and the mother have asked a friend of Joran, the suspect, the minor suspect, to come to their home to tell them what he has explained to the police. That is, well, I can say, was an obstruction of the investigation.


Lead Detective and Interrogator, Roy Tromp
48 Hours Interview
August 5, 2005

Tromp, who declined to provide details about exactly what investigators believe happened to Holloway, said that Paul van der Sloot has also changed his account the night Holloway vanished.  "Why should you do that if you are telling the truth?" he said.


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
'The Abrams Report' - June 30/05

ARLENE ELLIS-SCHIPPER, ARUBAN ATTORNEY: Well basically obstruction of justice is a criminal offense in our criminal code. However, there is an exoneration for family members in the first degree. So in the case of Mr. Van der Sloot it would not apply.


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
December 1, 2005

SCHIPPER: Well, the task force is a combination of concerned people of Aruba, as well as the government. And what we are doing is actually constantly monitoring this case and finding and promoting the truth and stimulating everything, from both support to the family...
DIMOND: But it`s not just -- you don`t speak for the police and the prosecution.
SCHIPPER: No.
DIMOND: You also speak for the merchants and the hotel operators on the island?
SCHIPPER: I do.
DIMOND: Don`t you think that`s a little bit in conflict there?
SCHIPPER: No.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 02:00:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
CARPE - just to clarify.  Why do you believe Ed Roos is Ed Smith?  Other than the first name Ed do you have a good reason to believe it?  Is it a guess or do you have more information on it?

To be honest, I would suspect Ed Smith to be a much younger person.





It is just my opinion the ED SMITH & ED ROOS
are one and the same. A pretty strong opinion.
My very own personal opinion, nothing more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 02:01:47 PM
People should look into & see what they find.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 02:03:44 PM
"The more one digs, the more things start to stink." -Jossy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 02:08:58 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 03:04:45 PM
While searching around I found a pdf of AM Digital from 6/4/05...interesting to read again...:

http://www.voiceofalabama.com/amAruba.pdf

I started out looking for Smith/Roos stuff and then found Rob Smith, Wyndom Mgr & chairman of Aruba Hospitality & Security Foundation....I came across an article from 2003 with members listed...including Dompig, but lost as I went on reading others.  It's probably old news, anyway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 03:08:33 PM
Duke Charges Dropped

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18046103/?GT1=9246


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 11, 2007, 03:19:31 PM
I have a quick question.

Back when this came out and it was discussed here, what was the general assumption on the reason JVS claimed they went directly to his house after being at C&C's?

That he had to make sure there was an explanation for any evidence found at the VDS place?


At this confrontation the suspect Satish S. Kalpoe explained that he recognized the suspect Joran A.P. Van Der Sloot as a person. The suspected Satish S. Kalpoe explained during the confrontation that the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot lied because on 30 May 2005, after they left Carlos & Charlies with Natalee, they did not go to the house of the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot. The suspect Satish Kalpoe requested the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot tell the truth.
The suspect Joran Van Der Sloot said during the confrontation that they had firstly driven to his house and said the suspect Satish Kalpoe is the one that is not telling the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: msmarple on April 11, 2007, 03:27:42 PM
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 03:28:21 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
I have a quick question.

Back when this came out and it was discussed here, what was the general assumption on the reason JVS claimed they went directly to his house after being at C&C's?

That he had to make sure there was an explanation for any evidence found at the VDS place?


At this confrontation the suspect Satish S. Kalpoe explained that he recognized the suspect Joran A.P. Van Der Sloot as a person. The suspected Satish S. Kalpoe explained during the confrontation that the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot lied because on 30 May 2005, after they left Carlos & Charlies with Natalee, they did not go to the house of the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot. The suspect Satish Kalpoe requested the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot tell the truth.
The suspect Joran Van Der Sloot said during the confrontation that they had firstly driven to his house and said the suspect Satish Kalpoe is the one that is not telling the truth.

Just got back from the store.  Good question, I don't have the answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: igsigs on April 11, 2007, 03:34:08 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"

At this confrontation the suspect Satish S. Kalpoe explained that he recognized the suspect Joran A.P. Van Der Sloot as a person. The suspected Satish S. Kalpoe explained during the confrontation that the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot lied because on 30 May 2005, after they left Carlos & Charlies with Natalee, they did not go to the house of the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot. The suspect Satish Kalpoe requested the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot tell the truth.
The suspect Joran Van Der Sloot said during the confrontation that they had firstly driven to his house and said the suspect Satish Kalpoe is the one that is not telling the truth.

Hi adoronron! Is this quote from a PV?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 03:35:40 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "adoronron"

At this confrontation the suspect Satish S. Kalpoe explained that he recognized the suspect Joran A.P. Van Der Sloot as a person. The suspected Satish S. Kalpoe explained during the confrontation that the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot lied because on 30 May 2005, after they left Carlos & Charlies with Natalee, they did not go to the house of the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot. The suspect Satish Kalpoe requested the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot tell the truth.
The suspect Joran Van Der Sloot said during the confrontation that they had firstly driven to his house and said the suspect Satish Kalpoe is the one that is not telling the truth.

Hi adoronron! Is this quote from a PV?

Yes, it's from the Joran/Satish face to face.  Here's the link:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=250


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 11, 2007, 03:37:25 PM
It's from a police interview. I think it's in the Important case douments area. I'll go find it again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: NM on April 11, 2007, 03:38:11 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
I have a quick question.

Back when this came out and it was discussed here, what was the general assumption on the reason JVS claimed they went directly to his house after being at C&C's?

That he had to make sure there was an explanation for any evidence found at the VDS place?


At this confrontation the suspect Satish S. Kalpoe explained that he recognized the suspect Joran A.P. Van Der Sloot as a person. The suspected Satish S. Kalpoe explained during the confrontation that the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot lied because on 30 May 2005, after they left Carlos & Charlies with Natalee, they did not go to the house of the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot. The suspect Satish Kalpoe requested the suspect Joran Van Der Sloot tell the truth.
The suspect Joran Van Der Sloot said during the confrontation that they had firstly driven to his house and said the suspect Satish Kalpoe is the one that is not telling the truth.

Hi Ado and welcome,

IIRC, we learned from k2 lawyers on MSM that jurin changed his story,In efforts to pin crimes on k2 only, to jk2 drove Nat to his house. He got out, exchanged email addresses w/ Nat and k2 drove off w/ her.

Hi all Monkeys and welcome Tiger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 11, 2007, 03:40:29 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Msmarple,

Is there another statement somewhere where Joran says they did not go in?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: igsigs on April 11, 2007, 03:40:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

Yes, it's from the Joran/Satish face to face.  Here's the link:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=250

Thanks Klaas. I thought for a minute that this quote might be from the *ride home* face-to-face i was looking for.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: NM on April 11, 2007, 03:45:13 PM
regarding the post from bfn(I know, I been catching up all day)

I believe that there was a concerted, well planned effort to cover up the crimes against Natalee.
I would never put well-intended nor friend together with helping a drugging, kidnaping, raping, murderer.

The families of Max Devries, Bud Larson, and Natalee Holloway were all put through the same, well-oiled machine.

ALE/Prosecution Check list:
0.) contact the spin-machine, the clean-up crew (a.k.a. local search teams and investigators)
1.) act like you are concerned.
2.) give the family the run-around.
3.) tell family you will handle it and they should go home.

Repeat steps 1 to 3.

If family still insists on finding their loved one;
4.) harass the family unmercifully.
5.) defame the victim and the family.
6.) start rumors of insurance scam, the missing ran away for a better life, they ran off with a new lover…..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 03:49:40 PM
Hi NM!

I agree with everything you just said!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on April 11, 2007, 03:51:15 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
December 1, 2005

SCHIPPER: Well, the task force is a combination of concerned people of Aruba, as well as the government. And what we are doing is actually constantly monitoring this case and finding and promoting the truth and stimulating everything, from both support to the family...
DIMOND: But it`s not just -- you don`t speak for the police and the prosecution.
SCHIPPER: No.
DIMOND: You also speak for the merchants and the hotel operators on the island?
SCHIPPER: I do.
DIMOND: Don`t you think that`s a little bit in conflict there?
SCHIPPER: No.



Janet, that last line by Arlene Ellis-Schipper pretty much sums up the whole attitude on Aruba. They have no conflicts of interest because they only have one interest- American tourism dollars.

In their eyes it's perfectly okay for the lead investigator to be a close friend of the main suspect's father, who is also implicated in the crime.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for the police chief to get fabricated testimony (see security guards, drug use) from his crackhead cousin.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their judges to ignore evidence in favor of one of their persdonal friends in the judicial system.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their government spokespeople to be paid with hotel and tourism dollars.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their government spokesperson to be related to a suspect in the case (see Guido).

They have never had an interest in what happened to Natalee Holloway, only in preserving their precious tourism dollars and making sure their criminals are not arrested so their illegal dealings and corruption can continue to remain intact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: NM on April 11, 2007, 03:56:39 PM
From jurin's 6/14 pv
You have just old me that you wanted to ask me about times. I can state the following.

When we, on May 30th, stopped in Deepak's car in front of my house, it was about 01.40 am. At that moment in time Deepak, Satish, Natalee and myself were in Deepak's car.

When Natalee and myself were dropped off at the Marriot Hotel by Satish and Deepak it was approximately 01.50 am


6/9 PV
We got into the car and before Deepak drove off I told Deepak and Satish that Natalee wanted to go to my house but that I could not take her there because my father and brothers were home. After I told Deepak and Satish this they said it was OK. Then I told the girl that I could not take her to my house but that I could come to her hotel room. She answered me that she did not want to go to her hotel room and that she wanted to go to the North coast to watch the sharks.

To your question as to what Natalee meant by wanting to go to my house, I answer you the following. With this Natalee according to me meant that she wanted to have fleshly intercourse with me. I could see from her body language that she wanted to have fleshly intercourse me. I do not know if Natalee had used narcotics.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: NM on April 11, 2007, 04:00:40 PM
Hey Klaas! Thanks!

Maybe the oldest profession isn't prostitution, the oldest profession is cover-up and that is why there is a (cover-up)saying that the oldest profession is prostitution! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 04:02:42 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "msmarple"
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Msmarple,

Is there another statement somewhere where Joran says they did not go in?


This is not one of the revealed witness/suspect statements but ... nevertheless the following transcript contains the words of Joran in regards to Natalee's desire to see his house and ... then her sudden change of mind.

Janet


Joran Van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 1, 2006

VAN DER SLOOT: ... We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you ever actually make it to your house?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did stop in front of my house. We got to my house and then, yes then I — then she said she wanted to go see sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Why sharks?

VAN DER SLOOT: I have no idea why she wanted to go see sharks and so I was laughing and telling her there's no sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.

VAN SUSTEREN: She had no interest in going into your house? She didn't say anything?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, at that point she wanted — she wanted to go see sharks ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: igsigs on April 11, 2007, 04:08:35 PM
Tamikosmom

Would you happen to have any links to any MSM quotes by Jones/John/Lejuez about the alibi story being made up around *the pool*?

I have seen the TOP95/Hasibokos report...wondering if there was anything else. TIA!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on April 11, 2007, 04:13:46 PM
Joran Van der sloot is the biggest effing liar.


He can execute SOME REALLY ripe ones almost all in one breath.


The lies forth as freely as that lard bucket dilapidated
run down, wheeze bag of a mother he has, and the
pedophile, rapist father.


Joran they say you're going down Sporter, pack light.

A toothbrush is all you need.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 04:20:03 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
December 1, 2005

SCHIPPER: Well, the task force is a combination of concerned people of Aruba, as well as the government. And what we are doing is actually constantly monitoring this case and finding and promoting the truth and stimulating everything, from both support to the family...
DIMOND: But it`s not just -- you don`t speak for the police and the prosecution.
SCHIPPER: No.
DIMOND: You also speak for the merchants and the hotel operators on the island?
SCHIPPER: I do.
DIMOND: Don`t you think that`s a little bit in conflict there?
SCHIPPER: No.



Janet, that last line by Arlene Ellis-Schipper pretty much sums up the whole attitude on Aruba. They have no conflicts of interest because they only have one interest- American tourism dollars.

In their eyes it's perfectly okay for the lead investigator to be a close friend of the main suspect's father, who is also implicated in the crime.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for the police chief to get fabricated testimony (see security guards, drug use) from his crackhead cousin.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their judges to ignore evidence in favor of one of their persdonal friends in the judicial system.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their government spokespeople to be paid with hotel and tourism dollars.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their government spokesperson to be related to a suspect in the case (see Guido).

They have never had an interest in what happened to Natalee Holloway, only in preserving their precious tourism dollars and making sure their criminals are not arrested so their illegal dealings and corruption can continue to remain intact.


Dayhike ... From day one I have been claiming that the Aruban investigation which was denying Natalee Holloway justice was a direct result of conflicts of interest.  You, my friend, have opened my eyes.  I now fully comprehend ... there never was a conflict of interest ... there never was a conflict.  Protecting Aruba's status quo has always been the sole focus in regards to prostitution, drug traffic, money laundering, prostitution, pornography and tourism.  Justice for Natalee Holloway was never going to happen.  All along ... Beth Twitty has been desperating trying to convey that message to whoever would listen.

Janet


Beth Twitty
'Scarborough Country'
October 21, 2005

HOLLOWAY TWITTY: They never—they never wanted to implicate these three young men.  They never wanted to implicate them from the beginning. And there is a list of reasons, you know, why we know that is true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: NM on April 11, 2007, 04:30:54 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"


Arlene Ellis-Schipper
NANCY GRACE
December 1, 2005

SCHIPPER: Well, the task force is a combination of concerned people of Aruba, as well as the government. And what we are doing is actually constantly monitoring this case and finding and promoting the truth and stimulating everything, from both support to the family...
DIMOND: But it`s not just -- you don`t speak for the police and the prosecution.
SCHIPPER: No.
DIMOND: You also speak for the merchants and the hotel operators on the island?
SCHIPPER: I do.
DIMOND: Don`t you think that`s a little bit in conflict there?
SCHIPPER: No.



Janet, that last line by Arlene Ellis-Schipper pretty much sums up the whole attitude on Aruba. They have no conflicts of interest because they only have one interest- American tourism dollars.

In their eyes it's perfectly okay for the lead investigator to be a close friend of the main suspect's father, who is also implicated in the crime.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for the police chief to get fabricated testimony (see security guards, drug use) from his crackhead cousin.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their judges to ignore evidence in favor of one of their persdonal friends in the judicial system.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their government spokespeople to be paid with hotel and tourism dollars.

In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their government spokesperson to be related to a suspect in the case (see Guido).

They have never had an interest in what happened to Natalee Holloway, only in preserving their precious tourism dollars and making sure their criminals are not arrested so their illegal dealings and corruption can continue to remain intact.

Tamikosmom, thanks for this clip.
Dayhiker, great and insightful summary of the workings of aruba.
I would like to add one more
In their eyes it is perfectly okay for their tourist board to report the (lack of) crime "stats"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on April 11, 2007, 04:45:41 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Tamikosmom

Would you happen to have any links to any MSM quotes by Jones/John/Lejuez about the alibi story being made up around *the pool*?

I have seen the TOP95/Hasibokos report...wondering if there was anything else. TIA!


igsigs, I apologize but ...  the following are the only two official transcripts quotes that I have saved regarding a "meeting" at the Van der Sloot's.  I googled and I googled (sound obscene LOL) but ... other than blogs and posts ... could never come up with anything regarding a "poolside" meeting.

Janet


Mickey John
On the Record w/ Greta
June 29, 2005

JOHN:.......He said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.


David Kock
On the Record w/ Greta
August 24, 2005

VAN SUSTEREN: Did Satish, your client, meet with Paul van der Sloot and Deepak and Joran?

KOCK: Yes — let's say, not that it was a meeting, no. I mean, these are friends that visited the house of Joran and the father, so it wasn't like a meeting was arranged and they just came for that meeting. They just were there, spoke with the father, like also happened before May 30.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: igsigs on April 11, 2007, 04:55:31 PM
Thanks Tamikosmom. I googled and googled  8)  also.

Unfortunately, the day that Lejuez was telling Jones' story about the pool was also the day of the Michael Jackson verdict. MSM did not fully cover the SGs release.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: NM on April 11, 2007, 05:03:11 PM
OK befoere I commute, here are a couple of my replys to earlier posts in this thread.

Carp, great casino shot of pvds. I can definitly see the face and glasses.
Before you posted that shot I was 50%pvds and 50% pvds' politician brother in the nl or (dare I say, L-----o). Now I am 100% sure it is pvds next to Nat and talking to Nat.
****************
Quote from: "Elaine"
Klass, did you see the comment left under the train picture on fotolog [list=]pervert @ 2007-04-06 07:24 said :

i hope your some hot chick jummmm
[/list]


Elaine, eeew!  don't know what fotolog is. Did someone write this to you?, If so, I'm curious about who would use the word  jummm?
I'm thinking that's how a dutch person would think to spell yummm, or a spanish speaking person spelling hummm?

************
BOC, the city of phila was never pro-boycott, unfortunately. There were a few inside city council and citizens that were for the boycott but somel very opposed to it, B@$(@&(S! sorry Lala's)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tylergal on April 11, 2007, 05:30:15 PM
Is fleshy intercourse where the female takes the jelly shots off a fat boy's bulging soft belly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 11, 2007, 05:34:49 PM
Hi Tyler - I have missed your roses!  Hope you are well.

Hello, Monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 05:45:00 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Is fleshy intercourse where the female takes the jelly shots off a fat boy's bulging soft belly.


Had a 'ewwwww' moment when I read that earlier, and it just came back :lol:  :lol:   ....good to see you, Tylergal.  :smt039


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 11, 2007, 06:01:59 PM
I think she saw the sharks,the sharks that live on the land.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on April 11, 2007, 06:06:20 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I think she saw the sharks,the sharks that live on the land.


Hi Tiger.  Welcome.
Yes the only sharks Natalee saw were two legged ones.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 06:13:02 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I think she saw the sharks,the sharks that live on the land.

Tiger - I took the liberty of giving you a fitting avatar.  Hope you don't mind  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 11, 2007, 06:48:46 PM
i have two questions,What is IIRC,and well,I don't really need to know what

fleshy intercourse is.Does the body language convey.I listen to Jimmy Buffet

a lot.His Fins is about what region,and the sharks that live on the land.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 11, 2007, 06:49:37 PM
I love it.All I need is my ltter in the picture.My vet has that picture.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 06:51:03 PM
If I recall correctly = IIRC


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: oldfart on April 11, 2007, 07:03:38 PM
Hi Monkeys.... :smt006

Peeking in for a bit then need to catch up reading past threads  :oops:

Anything in particular I should  hunt down?

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 11, 2007, 07:13:53 PM
Klass,you have mail


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: oldfart on April 11, 2007, 07:18:20 PM
Hi  Tiger

Welcome....

Sorry...  I'm trying to listen to Jossy & type at the same time :oops:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 07:32:36 PM
FYI - I've gotten mail from Anna and others in Alabama that tornados have touched down.  Please all of our Alabama friends - stay safe!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on April 11, 2007, 07:59:29 PM
Evening Monkeys

Tyler it's good to see you back in the cage.
Welcome to Ado & Tiger !!!

Stay safe Bama Monkeys. That crap is probably heading my way. It always does after it leaves Bama.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 08:35:26 PM
Evening everyone...Whew!  We had a terrible storm today and a tornado was reported less than 5 miles from me.  They held the schools until things were calmer.  Believe it or not, now the sky is just lovely with a sunset and lots of color.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 08:39:20 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Evening everyone...Whew!  We had a terrible storm today and a tornado was reported less than 5 miles from me.  They held the schools until things were calmer.  Believe it or not, now the sky is just lovely with a sunset and lots of color.

Glad you are OK!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 08:40:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Evening everyone...Whew!  We had a terrible storm today and a tornado was reported less than 5 miles from me.  They held the schools until things were calmer.  Believe it or not, now the sky is just lovely with a sunset and lots of color.
Hi Lalas, and all monkeys! Lalas I am glad that you didnt get the tornado. We have rain off and on here in Pa. supposed to get heavier tonight? Hope all other Alabama people are safe!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 08:41:35 PM
Was just looking at the radar and it looks like those storms are over GA, now.  Since Lala's is okay, hoping all are the same.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 08:48:19 PM
Hi Elaine!  Are you planning a collection of glasses as your trademark?  I think maybe something for evening and Sundays too.  :lol:

2NJ hope you are doing good.  Haven't spoken to you lately.  I have seen you but was too busying in the cage to say hello.

Did I see our newbie Tiger in here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 08:49:41 PM
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket

[1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 08:55:02 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Elaine!  Are you planning a collection of glasses as your trademark?  I think maybe something for evening and Sundays too.  :lol:

2NJ hope you are doing good.  Haven't spoken to you lately.  I have seen you but was too busying in the cage to say hello.

Did I see our newbie Tiger in here?
Oh yes my glasses are my trademark (yes in real life too) Can never have too many!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 08:55:11 PM
At least he's wering vertical stripes!! :lol:  Looks like he's still on the Frosted Flakes. :P

Lala's, will send you an email one of these days.  Haven't had the heart to tell everyone about my Dad, as you suggested back then.  I'm in an out of here....shared computer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 08:55:19 PM
I see corn flakes are still being consumed at an enormous rate on Aruba.    :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 08:56:22 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
At least he's wering vertical stripes!! :lol:  Looks like he's still on the Frosted Flakes. :P

Lala's, will send you an email one of these days.  Haven't had the heart to tell everyone about my Dad, as you suggested back then.  I'm in an out of here....shared computer.


I am here anytime.  {{{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 08:56:29 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
At least he's wearing vertical stripes!! :lol:  Looks like he's still on the Frosted Flakes. :P

Lala's, will send you an email one of these days.  Haven't had the heart to tell everyone about my Dad, as you suggested back then.  I'm in an out of here....shared computer.


Self edit - wering should have been wearing...of course.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 09:04:29 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Elaine!  Are you planning a collection of glasses as your trademark?  I think maybe something for evening and Sundays too.  :lol:

2NJ hope you are doing good.  Haven't spoken to you lately.  I have seen you but was too busying in the cage to say hello.

Did I see our newbie Tiger in here?
Oh yes my glasses are my trademark (yes in real life too) Can never have too many!
I look just like my avatar see  (http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/meerlyhere/eglasses.gif)[/url]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 09:06:00 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
At least he's wering vertical stripes!! :lol:  Looks like he's still on the Frosted Flakes. :P

Lala's, will send you an email one of these days.  Haven't had the heart to tell everyone about my Dad, as you suggested back then.  I'm in an out of here....shared computer.
Hi 2NJsons!! Hi Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on April 11, 2007, 09:08:16 PM
Lala's glad you made it thru the storm & you have mail


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 09:09:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket[

1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.

Boy if this doesn't speak volumes, the prosecutor and the corrupt cop together in a send off.  Wonder where Paulus and his buddy VanDerSlaten are. Probably off to the side eating appetizers.
Can't help but wonder what KJ got out of all this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 09:11:46 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket[

1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.

Boy if this doesn't speak volumes, the prosecutor and the corrupt cop together in a send off.  Wonder where Paulus and his buddy VanDerSlaten are. Probably off to the side eating appetizers.
Can't help but wonder what KJ got out of all this.
But its not a conflict of interest or anything :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 09:12:21 PM
Sounds like she got a promotion  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 09:17:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket

[1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  Of all the police officers on the force he is front and center.  They are both scumbags.  They are probably congratulating each other on how great they did with the coverup.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 09:23:21 PM
from the article about Karin :
    Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

    After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

    Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket

    [1] in Amsterdam.

    [1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases
What do they mean a lot of fun, it is not supposed to be fun


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 09:23:54 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "msmarple"
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Msmarple,

Is there another statement somewhere where Joran says they did not go in?


This is not one of the revealed witness/suspect statements but ... nevertheless the following transcript contains the words of Joran in regards to Natalee's desire to see his house and ... then her sudden change of mind.

She wanted to go see the Sharks - I mean really WTF does that mean? That's the most stupid statement I've ever heard.  
I don't look at that statement as something Natalee really said, I look at it as a statement from the guy who drugged and murdered her, wondering how he thinks this fits into his alibi.

I see it this way, at this point Natalee is drugged to the brink of dying. Joran is trying to make a case, an alibi to to fit his storyline. It's changed 10 or 15 times in an effort to make it more realistic.  
Everyone on the planet knows what happened, even the Aruban Suits and FOB hatemongers, it's just a matter of someone stepping up and doing the right thing.  I'm not holding my breath.



Joran Van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 1, 2006

VAN DER SLOOT: ... We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you ever actually make it to your house?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did stop in front of my house. We got to my house and then, yes then I — then she said she wanted to go see sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Why sharks?

VAN DER SLOOT: I have no idea why she wanted to go see sharks and so I was laughing and telling her there's no sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.

VAN SUSTEREN: She had no interest in going into your house? She didn't say anything?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, at that point she wanted — she wanted to go see sharks ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 09:25:05 PM
Dennis Jacobs' shirt matches the curtains in the window.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 09:27:34 PM
Quote from: "San"
Dennis Jacobs' shirt matches the curtains in the window.
Yes it does, LOL. :smt003


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 09:33:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket

[1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  Of all the police officers on the force he is front and center.  They are both scumbags.  They are probably congratulating each other on how great they did with the coverup.


I just gotta say this and it might be a little tacky but seriously, look at Jacobs.  Is he or is he not the most hidious disgusting looking human on earth?  Does he only own one shirt?  
We now know that drugging and raping young tourist girls is a Sport in Aruba, it's easy to see how a fat ass like Jacobs might help coverup it up.
He is truly sickening to look at. Why would a man that fat and obese live in a place with so much heat? Perks?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Frijole on April 11, 2007, 09:33:41 PM
Quote from: "San"

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  


For the free food!!!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 09:36:23 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "msmarple"
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Msmarple,

Is there another statement somewhere where Joran says they did not go in?


This is not one of the revealed witness/suspect statements but ... nevertheless the following transcript contains the words of Joran in regards to Natalee's desire to see his house and ... then her sudden change of mind.

She wanted to go see the Sharks - I mean really WTF does that mean? That's the most stupid statement I've ever heard.  
I don't look at that statement as something Natalee really said, I look at it as a statement from the guy who drugged and murdered her, wondering how he thinks this fits into his alibi.

I see it this way, at this point Natalee is drugged to the brink of dying. Joran is trying to make a case, an alibi to to fit his storyline. It's changed 10 or 15 times in an effort to make it more realistic.  
Everyone on the planet knows what happened, even the Aruban Suits and FOB hatemongers, it's just a matter of someone stepping up and doing the right thing.  I'm not holding my breath.



Joran Van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 1, 2006

VAN DER SLOOT: ... We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you ever actually make it to your house?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did stop in front of my house. We got to my house and then, yes then I — then she said she wanted to go see sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Why sharks?

VAN DER SLOOT: I have no idea why she wanted to go see sharks and so I was laughing and telling her there's no sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.

VAN SUSTEREN: She had no interest in going into your house? She didn't say anything?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, at that point she wanted — she wanted to go see sharks ...
She wanted to go see the Sharks - I mean really WTF does that mean? That's the most stupid statement I've ever heard.
I don't look at that statement as something Natalee really said, I look at it as a statement from the guy who drugged and murdered her, wondering how he thinks this fits into his alibi.

I see it this way, at this point Natalee is drugged to the brink of dying. Joran is trying to make a case, an alibi to to fit his storyline. It's changed 10 or 15 times in an effort to make it more realistic.
Everyone on the planet knows what happened, even the Aruban Suits and FOB hatemongers, it's just a matter of someone stepping up and doing the right thing. I'm not holding my breath.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 09:42:14 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket

[1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  Of all the police officers on the force he is front and center.  They are both scumbags.  They are probably congratulating each other on how great they did with the coverup.


I just gotta say this and it might be a little tacky but seriously, look at Jacobs.  Is he or is he not the most hidious disgusting looking human on earth?  Does he only own one shirt?  
We now know that drugging and raping young tourist girls is a Sport in Aruba, it's easy to see how a fat ass like Jacobs might help coverup it up.
He is truly sickening to look at. Why would a man that fat and obese live in a place with so much heat? Perks?

He truly is a disgusting human.  That fat loser.  He can't even walk without waddling.  Can you picture him running after a criminal.  Hey maybe that was the earthquake Aruba recently had.  Where was Jacobs that day :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on April 11, 2007, 09:43:26 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

I truely think he has food stains on his shirt. Evening Monkeys, how is everyone tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 09:43:27 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "San"

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  


For the free food!!!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Rice Krispy Treats.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 11, 2007, 09:46:55 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket

[1] in Amsterdam.

[1] Part of the prosecutors office that deals with appealed criminal cases.

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  Of all the police officers on the force he is front and center.  They are both scumbags.  They are probably congratulating each other on how great they did with the coverup.


I just gotta say this and it might be a little tacky but seriously, look at Jacobs.  Is he or is he not the most hidious disgusting looking human on earth?  Does he only own one shirt?  
We now know that drugging and raping young tourist girls is a Sport in Aruba, it's easy to see how a fat ass like Jacobs might help coverup it up.
He is truly sickening to look at. Why would a man that fat and obese live in a place with so much heat? Perks?


No, Dan,  he owns 2 shirts.  The other one was in the wash.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 09:53:34 PM
After seeing that picture I have no doubt who picture Jacobs to head up the investigation.  I always thought it was Van der Straten but now we are seeing who the true person was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Frijole on April 11, 2007, 09:55:39 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"

I truely think he has food stains on his shirt.


LOL... I thought it was just the fabric was stretched from the bulging mass of FAT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Frijole on April 11, 2007, 09:56:03 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "San"

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  


For the free food!!!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Rice Krispy Treats.


Good one sistah San!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: AZSunny on April 11, 2007, 09:56:09 PM
Quote from: "San"
After seeing that picture I have no doubt who picture Jacobs to head up the investigation.  I always thought it was Van der Straten but now we are seeing who the true person was.


Are you sure San?  I think he was just there for the food.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 11, 2007, 09:56:16 PM
Hi, back at ya, Elaine.

Seems odd that the ALE rub elbows with the procecutor at a farewell party, but then, what do I know.  He is a very heavy man.  Not exactly the type working the streets, but more the desk variety.  

At least KJ wore a white bra under her white blouse....the skirt though....nevermind...
 :) She's got hands on hips and a smile...doesn't look upset about the change and AG at whatever in Amsterdam....BIG 'L' on Aruba is in the books.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 11, 2007, 10:01:50 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "msmarple"
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Msmarple,

Is there another statement somewhere where Joran says they did not go in?


This is not one of the revealed witness/suspect statements but ... nevertheless the following transcript contains the words of Joran in regards to Natalee's desire to see his house and ... then her sudden change of mind.

She wanted to go see the Sharks - I mean really WTF does that mean? That's the most stupid statement I've ever heard.  
I don't look at that statement as something Natalee really said, I look at it as a statement from the guy who drugged and murdered her, wondering how he thinks this fits into his alibi.

I see it this way, at this point Natalee is drugged to the brink of dying. Joran is trying to make a case, an alibi to to fit his storyline. It's changed 10 or 15 times in an effort to make it more realistic.  
Everyone on the planet knows what happened, even the Aruban Suits and FOB hatemongers, it's just a matter of someone stepping up and doing the right thing.  I'm not holding my breath.



Joran Van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 1, 2006

VAN DER SLOOT: ... We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you ever actually make it to your house?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did stop in front of my house. We got to my house and then, yes then I — then she said she wanted to go see sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Why sharks?

VAN DER SLOOT: I have no idea why she wanted to go see sharks and so I was laughing and telling her there's no sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.

VAN SUSTEREN: She had no interest in going into your house? She didn't say anything?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, at that point she wanted — she wanted to go see sharks ...


Oh hell Joran just tell them you stopped by the house to grab your video cam and then the next night you sold the video you took to backseatbangers.com. But then they wouldn't believe such a nice boy would do such a thing would they?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 10:02:10 PM
Quote from: AZSunny
Quote from: IndyDan
Quote from: San
Quote from: klaasend
This was posted at RU - it's a photo of KJ's sendoff from Aruba.  Nice pic of Jacobs  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/KJsendoff.jpg)

Translation of the above by Dugo at RU:

After a period of three years as chief prosecutor on Aruba Karin says bye.

Her colleagues wish her a lot of fun in her new job as AG at the ressortsparket
This picture is messerizing. I can't help but stare at that fat pathetic POS Jacobs and wonder why he'd coverup for the VanDerSloots.
But the more I stare the more I tend to see this guy as a fat-assed loser with nothing in life but to be somebody and he got that little fame as the head honcho in a huge national case. I think he's hoping his little contribution will be paid back by all his croinies.  
I hope this fat puck has a heart attack soon and his last vision is Dave Holloway asking him for help.

[]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:03:35 PM
Indydan - LOLOL  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 10:06:12 PM
Sorry, I'm not doing a very good job and "replying" tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 10:14:16 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Quote from: "msmarple"
ado - My guess would be that JVDS anticipated that someone might have seen the car and needed an explanation for that. Satish had not anticipated this need.

However, that only explains a brief stop at the house - I think Joran said they didn't go in? Supposedly Natalee wanted to see his house?

What was the date of the statement(s) you're quoting?


Msmarple,

Is there another statement somewhere where Joran says they did not go in?

Hey

This is not one of the revealed witness/suspect statements but ... nevertheless the following transcript contains the words of Joran in regards to Natalee's desire to see his house and ... then her sudden change of mind.

She wanted to go see the Sharks - I mean really WTF does that mean? That's the most stupid statement I've ever heard.  
I don't look at that statement as something Natalee really said, I look at it as a statement from the guy who drugged and murdered her, wondering how he thinks this fits into his alibi.

I see it this way, at this point Natalee is drugged to the brink of dying. Joran is trying to make a case, an alibi to to fit his storyline. It's changed 10 or 15 times in an effort to make it more realistic.  
Everyone on the planet knows what happened, even the Aruban Suits and FOB hatemongers, it's just a matter of someone stepping up and doing the right thing.  I'm not holding my breath.



Joran Van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
March 1, 2006

VAN DER SLOOT: ... We were speaking English to each other and I asked her if she wanted to go back to her hotel and that's when she said that she wanted to — she asked me if I -- if I had a big house or not and then — then she said — I said to her "Do you want to see my house?" And she's like "Yes, I want to go to your house."

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you ever actually make it to your house?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes, we did. We actually did stop in front of my house. We got to my house and then, yes then I — then she said she wanted to go see sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Why sharks?

VAN DER SLOOT: I have no idea why she wanted to go see sharks and so I was laughing and telling her there's no sharks.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did you actually go into your house with her?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, no, no. We never even got out of the car there.

VAN SUSTEREN: She had no interest in going into your house? She didn't say anything?

VAN DER SLOOT: No, at that point she wanted — she wanted to go see sharks ...


Oh hell Joran just tell them you stopped by the house to grab your video cam and then the next night you sold the video you took to backseatbangers.com. But then they wouldn't believe such a nice boy would do such a thing would they?

 Hey Ron,
Just wanted to say "welcome", nice to have another 'guy' on board. We're definately outnumbered here but it's not a bad thing, not a nicer bunch of ladies to be found anywhere -- as long as you don't lie.  Lie and they'll be on you like a Pitbull on a bunny.  Just ask Joran. :smt003


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: IndyDan on April 11, 2007, 10:15:40 PM
Ok, gotta hit the hay. I'm working from home tomorrow, see ya in the morn.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 10:16:20 PM
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:16:25 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Ok, gotta hit the hay. I'm working from home tomorrow, see ya in the morn.

Nite Indy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:17:11 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.

Actually in Aruba ALE reports to the Prosecutors office, so they reported to her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Tiger on April 11, 2007, 10:17:24 PM
I think it is a sweat stain,not food on Jacobs.I think KJ  i is happy to get out alive.She looks depressed,possible suicidal.She needs to leave,before she commits a heinous act on herself,or with Jacobs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 11, 2007, 10:19:00 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "San"

That fat POS looks like he got bigger.  Why the hell would he be there.  


For the free food!!!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Rice Krispy Treats.


To celebrate a cover up well done and congratulate each other for it.  :evil:

Hi Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 10:19:49 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.
It is still funny that Jacobs shirt matches the curtains, though! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:21:13 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.
It is still funny that Jacobs shirt matches the curtains, though! :lol:  :lol:

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 11, 2007, 10:21:56 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I think it is a sweat stain,not food on Jacobs.I think KJ  i is happy to get out alive.She looks depressed,possible suicidal.She needs to leave,before she commits a heinous act on herself,or with Jacobs.


OMG! A heinous act with Jacobs?  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

That would take a contortionist.  :lol:

Hiya, Tiger! I'm one of the picture ladies, and you've got a dandy!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 11, 2007, 10:23:17 PM
Jacob's shirt IS the curtains. One way draw!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 10:24:55 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jacob's shirt IS the curtains. One way draw!
:smt043 ROFLMAO!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 11, 2007, 10:26:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.

Actually in Aruba ALE reports to the Prosecutors office, so they reported to her.


My point exactly...is Jacobs Dutch?  Do you know by any chance?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:27:09 PM
Ten more posts and we can change threads.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Frijole on April 11, 2007, 10:27:14 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jacob's shirt IS the curtains. One way draw!


LOL  I was thinking "Baloon valance".   :lol:  :lol:

He is disgusting and a POS as sistah San says.  He is a walking heart attack.  Karin will probably be assigned the investigation of the Aruban investigation once she gets to Holland.

Ya know?  grrrrr


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:27:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.

Actually in Aruba ALE reports to the Prosecutors office, so they reported to her.


My point exactly...is Jacobs Dutch?  Do you know by any chance?

I don't really know.  I'll try to find out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Frijole on April 11, 2007, 10:28:29 PM
oops.... edit that to read balloon valance....

there's one more post for ya San!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 10:29:13 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.

Actually in Aruba ALE reports to the Prosecutors office, so they reported to her.


My point exactly...is Jacobs Dutch?  Do you know by any chance?
I don't know, but he is ummmmm, overweight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: robots on April 11, 2007, 10:29:24 PM
<--------------doing my part to get this thread changed

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:29:27 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
oops.... edit that to read balloon valance....

there's one more post for ya San!

Thanks for the help :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 11, 2007, 10:29:46 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jacob's shirt IS the curtains. One way draw!


LOL  I was thinking "Baloon valance".   :lol:  :lol:

He is disgusting and a POS as sistah San says.  He is a walking heart attack.  Karin will probably be assigned the investigation of the Aruban investigation once she gets to Holland.

Ya know?  grrrrr


Well..............that casket is gonna need a few more handles, or one of those elusive Aruban bulldozers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: San on April 11, 2007, 10:30:14 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I don't understand why you guys are all upset with Jacobs and Janssen hob knobbing together.  In the United States it's done all the time.  The District Attorney is close associates with law enforcement.  Had they done their jobs and not been so nonchalant about it all this would not even bother us. The problem is the complicity in allowing or participating in Paulus' cover up of what happened.  Yes, they most certainly provided favors for the Sloots.  Had it been just the Kalpoes...Mama K would be making trips to KIA on weekends to visit her sons.

Actually in Aruba ALE reports to the Prosecutors office, so they reported to her.


My point exactly...is Jacobs Dutch?  Do you know by any chance?
I don't know, but he is ummmmm, overweight.

Just a little :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: Elaine on April 11, 2007, 10:30:17 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
oops.... edit that to read balloon valance....

there's one more post for ya San!
LOL! Hi Beans! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 11, 2007, 10:30:42 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
oops.... edit that to read balloon valance....

there's one more post for ya San!



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
AND another!..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 11, 2007, 10:31:44 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 599

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1050


Title: Lively Case Discussion #598 4/9 - 4/11/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 11, 2007, 10:31:59 PM
Oh, Elaine! Hon, I just found some "Star" sunglasses! You're in business for the Fourth Of July!  :lol: