Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 12:48:48 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 12:48:48 PM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/candleman2justice2007.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 02:27:40 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 15, 2007, 02:28:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


ROFL!!! :lol:  :lol: No words. That's perfect!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 02:31:03 PM
I could have sworn you started a thread last night


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 15, 2007, 02:31:04 PM
OMG, Klaas!!!  :lol:  :lol: You just rared back and whacked my funny bone!!!

Joran's just tap dancing around the truth!!
I like to look at that and think of somebody shooting at his feet!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 02:32:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)

This is so funny.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on April 15, 2007, 02:33:09 PM
:smt044 OR he's trying to address a wedgie. :smt043


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 02:36:30 PM
Klaas, Anna, Anyone,

Where can I find postings on the 4 AM ATM visit. When PVS was hit with that info during his lawsuit in what manner was that fact told or presented to him? Was it just that they knew he made an ATM visit becasue there had been activity on one of his accounts at that ATM at that time? Or did they have a security cam record of him at the ATM? :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 02:37:23 PM
Quote from: "San"
I could have sworn you started a thread last night


I did, but it turned into a photo evaluation thread so I changed the name of it  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 02:39:37 PM
From previous thread...Tamikosmom post:  My comments in red.

Benvinda de Souza - Family Attorney
Letter to Karen Jansen
June 23, 2005

<snipped>

Also understood by Claudio is that mr. Van Der Sloot said that he picked up Joran around 4:00 am close to McDonald’s.

<snipped>

What comes next is the questions that the family wanted answers to:

1) Has Mr. Groeneveld been interrogated about the times Probably didn't matter what he said, since no one asked him.

2) Has Mr. Eldridge been interrogated Most probably not.

3) Why hasn’t Jug Twitty been interrogated He did give a statement, or did they even ask him for one?

4) Did the police notice that the clothes were unsuitable for somebody who had just been in the casino? What clothes are we talking about here?  When?  The ones the maid had laundered or the ones on the casino video?

5) Has it been confirmed that Joran has been in the casino? This because a personnel of the casino had mentioned that he had seen Nathalee We now know the answer to this question. Yes he was there along with Papa.  Wonder who the "personnel" was?

6) Has Charles Croes been interrogated? You don't ask the person that has all cell phone records in Aruba any questions, too many answers you can't explain.

7) Is it true that Mr. Kalpoe owns a ‘koei’ [?! Maybe they mean a ‘kooi’, which is a cage?!] Which Mr. Kalpoe would this be? Deepak, perhaps?  Never heard this one. Anyone?

Cool Has it been established that Joran told his father in the presence of the grou that he was first in the Wyndham and then in the Raddisson and afterwards he went home?

9) Has there been any forensic evidence and if so, where? All evidence was sent to the Netherlands.  Doesn't anyone keep up here? LOL

10) What does the Justice Department base their reasonable suspicion on, other than statements of the suspects? Which Justice Dept are we talking about here?  U. S. ?  Didn't know they had actually made a statement concerning this case yet.

11) Are there other people that are considered suspects or is the Justice Department only focusing on these suspects? Again, which place?  Are they talking about Janssen's office?

12) It seems that Joran’s Headmaster said to Jug Twitty that Joran said that Nathalee had drowned . Have these people been interrogated I don't think the headmaster ever stated for the record that Joran said this.  I could be wrong. Anyone know?

Translation Credit - Arubagirl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 02:39:40 PM
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaas, Anna, Anyone,

Where can I find postings on the 4 AM ATM visit. When PVS was hit with that info during his lawsuit in what manner was that fact told or presented to him? Was it just that they knew he made an ATM visit becasue there had been activity on one of his accounts at that ATM at that time? Or did they have a security cam record of him at the ATM? :?

I know there's a front page post on it.  I'll find it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: nonesuche on April 15, 2007, 02:42:02 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
:smt044 OR he's trying to address a wedgie. :smt043


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I hope both !  :lol:  :lol:

well it's monsoons and hail here right now, batten down the hatches those upwind from our parts, it's a comin !!!!!!!!

did lala's ever go to bed last night? she's still hard at work shango-ing  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 02:44:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaas, Anna, Anyone,

Where can I find postings on the 4 AM ATM visit. When PVS was hit with that info during his lawsuit in what manner was that fact told or presented to him? Was it just that they knew he made an ATM visit becasue there had been activity on one of his accounts at that ATM at that time? Or did they have a security cam record of him at the ATM? :?

I know there's a front page post on it.  I'll find it.


I think you'll find most of that information here in the fp post on SM:

http://tinyurl.com/27xaf6

PAUL VAN DER SLOOT HAD TWO PERSONAL CONTACTS WITH NATALEE THE NIGHT SHE DISAPPEARED

ORANJESTAD(AAN) On the 13th of  February 2007, the Superior Court dictated sentence against Paul van der Sloot in the case that he appealed with regards to the damages that his person as well as his family members asked for, seeing that in the Primary Court (Court of First Instance) Paul van der Sloot alone (no one else in his family) got a reward of 40,000 guilders for damages and 1500 guilders to cover the costs of the lawyers, court clerks, etc.
 
The sentence of the Superior Court fell like a bomb on Paul van der Sloot and his defence attorney because, according to the attorney, the Court made use of informations that do not agree with the truth.
 
The Court dictated that Paul van der Sloot fetched Joran and Natalee at the McDonald Palm Beach branch and took the two of them to the Holiday Inn, according to declarations by witnesses and also informations obtained from a phone tap carried out by the police.
 
Until recently, this key information was not known in the press and apparently only by the Police and Dept. of Justice.
 
The whole case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway gets a different twist now that the information has come out from no less than the Superior Court, and in which mention is made of the declarations of witnesses and a phone tap that show or give an indication that Paul van der Sloot had on two occasions personal contact with Natalee during the night that she disappeared.
 
Mention is made that, according to one or more official reports of the phone tap and also the declaration of Paul van der Sloot himself, that Paul fetched Joran and Natalee at McDonald and took them to the Holiday Inn.
 
Based on this information, the judicial authorities and the police had at that time a justified basis to arrest Paul van der Sloot based on different suspicions.
 
According to the Superior Court, Paul van der Sloot himself is guilty, he made possible or caused (depends how every one interprets the grammar in the sentence of the Court’s) himself to be arrested and that Aruba cannot be held responsible for the damages that he suffered and for which he was demanding damages, which he won in First Instance, but appealed to get more, and now has lost everything.
 
In the sentence there are various points and aspects that brought a different view on the Natalee Holloway case and that in the coming days will be analyzed, but the most important information is the matter of fetching Natalee and Joran at the McDonald, Palm Beach, and also that Paul had on two occasions personal contacts with Natalee on the night that she disappeared.
 
The cardinal question now is: what did the police authorities hear on the tapped phone of Paul van der Sloot, and the next question is hotter still: at what time, under what circumstances, and where did Paul van der Sloot as the father of Joran van der Sloot  have contacts with Natalee Holloway the night she disappeared?
 
If the Superior Court says that in the official report mention is made that Paul van der Sloot fetched Joran and Natalee on the aforementioned night at McDonald Palm Beach, that is the first contact, but where did the second contact take place?
 
On the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, Paul van der Sloot met again with Natalee after he left Joran with Natalee at the Holiday Inn? If that is the case, then where and at what time did Natalee disappear that night?
 
In the declarations of Joran and the Kalpoe brothers there was a heated discussion amongst them, with formal denials as to whether they went with Natalee to the house of Paul van der Sloot on the night of her disappearance.
 
That’s why it is important to get clarity on the two occasions that Paul van der Sloot had personal contacts with Natalee on the night in question and where and under what circumstances they occurred.
 
The lawyer for Paul van der Sloot denies that Paul declared that he fetched Joran and Natalee at McDonald Palm Beach, and that he had contacts with Natalee the night she disappeared, but the Superior Court of Justice based its sentence on the information presented by the interim Attorney General of Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 02:50:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "adoronron"
Klaas, Anna, Anyone,

Where can I find postings on the 4 AM ATM visit. When PVS was hit with that info during his lawsuit in what manner was that fact told or presented to him? Was it just that they knew he made an ATM visit becasue there had been activity on one of his accounts at that ATM at that time? Or did they have a security cam record of him at the ATM? :?

I know there's a front page post on it.  I'll find it.


I think you'll find most of that information here in the fp post on SM:

http://tinyurl.com/27xaf6

PAUL VAN DER SLOOT HAD TWO PERSONAL CONTACTS WITH NATALEE THE NIGHT SHE DISAPPEARED

ORANJESTAD(AAN) On the 13th of  February 2007, the Superior Court dictated sentence against Paul van der Sloot in the case that he appealed with regards to the damages that his person as well as his family members asked for, seeing that in the Primary Court (Court of First Instance) Paul van der Sloot alone (no one else in his family) got a reward of 40,000 guilders for damages and 1500 guilders to cover the costs of the lawyers, court clerks, etc.
 
The sentence of the Superior Court fell like a bomb on Paul van der Sloot and his defence attorney because, according to the attorney, the Court made use of informations that do not agree with the truth.
 
The Court dictated that Paul van der Sloot fetched Joran and Natalee at the McDonald Palm Beach branch and took the two of them to the Holiday Inn, according to declarations by witnesses and also informations obtained from a phone tap carried out by the police.
 
Until recently, this key information was not known in the press and apparently only by the Police and Dept. of Justice.
 
The whole case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway gets a different twist now that the information has come out from no less than the Superior Court, and in which mention is made of the declarations of witnesses and a phone tap that show or give an indication that Paul van der Sloot had on two occasions personal contact with Natalee during the night that she disappeared.
 
Mention is made that, according to one or more official reports of the phone tap and also the declaration of Paul van der Sloot himself, that Paul fetched Joran and Natalee at McDonald and took them to the Holiday Inn.
 
Based on this information, the judicial authorities and the police had at that time a justified basis to arrest Paul van der Sloot based on different suspicions.
 
According to the Superior Court, Paul van der Sloot himself is guilty, he made possible or caused (depends how every one interprets the grammar in the sentence of the Court’s) himself to be arrested and that Aruba cannot be held responsible for the damages that he suffered and for which he was demanding damages, which he won in First Instance, but appealed to get more, and now has lost everything.
 
In the sentence there are various points and aspects that brought a different view on the Natalee Holloway case and that in the coming days will be analyzed, but the most important information is the matter of fetching Natalee and Joran at the McDonald, Palm Beach, and also that Paul had on two occasions personal contacts with Natalee on the night that she disappeared.
 
The cardinal question now is: what did the police authorities hear on the tapped phone of Paul van der Sloot, and the next question is hotter still: at what time, under what circumstances, and where did Paul van der Sloot as the father of Joran van der Sloot  have contacts with Natalee Holloway the night she disappeared?
 
If the Superior Court says that in the official report mention is made that Paul van der Sloot fetched Joran and Natalee on the aforementioned night at McDonald Palm Beach, that is the first contact, but where did the second contact take place?
 
On the night of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, Paul van der Sloot met again with Natalee after he left Joran with Natalee at the Holiday Inn? If that is the case, then where and at what time did Natalee disappear that night?
 
In the declarations of Joran and the Kalpoe brothers there was a heated discussion amongst them, with formal denials as to whether they went with Natalee to the house of Paul van der Sloot on the night of her disappearance.
 
That’s why it is important to get clarity on the two occasions that Paul van der Sloot had personal contacts with Natalee on the night in question and where and under what circumstances they occurred.
 
The lawyer for Paul van der Sloot denies that Paul declared that he fetched Joran and Natalee at McDonald Palm Beach, and that he had contacts with Natalee the night she disappeared, but the Superior Court of Justice based its sentence on the information presented by the interim Attorney General of Aruba.


So who's lying?  The courts or Sloot man? Tylergal has always purported that she was carried to the HI.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 02:55:47 PM
Lala's - the courts are looking at "wire tap" evidence.  I suppose if PVDS was talking to someone about it he could have known his phone was tapped and was lying.  How will we know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 02:59:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Lala's - the courts are looking at "wire tap" evidence.  I suppose if PVDS was talking to someone about it he could have known his phone was tapped and was lying.  How will we know?

This is so true Klaas.  Because Joran says in one of his statements to Deepak about the phones being tapped.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: nonesuche on April 15, 2007, 03:06:05 PM
just downright amazing, reading this makes me feel ill all over again

a lying officer of the courts yet there is no corruption?  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 03:08:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Lala's - the courts are looking at "wire tap" evidence.  I suppose if PVDS was talking to someone about it he could have known his phone was tapped and was lying.  How will we know?

This is so true Klaas.  Because Joran says in one of his statements to Deepak about the phones being tapped.


From the Police Car Transcript:

    Joran: You said then via the telephone like, that I have the jackpot. You said now [?] through the phone , I have the fxxxing jackpot. You forget that the phone is tapped, right?
    Satish or Deepak: Shut your trap [hou je bek]
    Joran: You forget that, right +++++? Then you arrive home and you say how you arranged everything. You say "I have fixed it". Good for you [meaning your own fault]. because of you he is also in jail.
    Deepak: Yeaaaaaaaaahhh! Yeahhhhhhhhh!
    [/list]

    Sometimes I wonder if Joran said this about the phones being tapped because they really didn't know they were tapped.  This way they can say we know the phones were tapped and we lied on purpose like everything else in this case of lies.

    Didn't Deepak say in one of his statements he knew he was being monitored and he lied on purpose.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 15, 2007, 03:09:46 PM
    San-

    I think they all knew and that Paulus had an insider giving him a heads-up on every step the ALE was taking


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 03:10:29 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Lala's - the courts are looking at "wire tap" evidence.  I suppose if PVDS was talking to someone about it he could have known his phone was tapped and was lying.  How will we know?


    Thanks Klass for the link.

    By wire tapped you mean phone tapped?

    Ane everyone is sure it's tapped information, not taped as in taped conversation?
    And I guess none of us know when the date of the tapped/taped conversation took place, correct?

    I can't find in the link you sent me much information on the ATM visit. Only that PVS was told they have tapped information on him. I really am interested on what evidence there is about the ATM stop.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 03:14:13 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Lala's - the courts are looking at "wire tap" evidence.  I suppose if PVDS was talking to someone about it he could have known his phone was tapped and was lying.  How will we know?


    Thanks Klass for the link.

    By wire tapped you mean phone tapped?

    Ane everyone is sure it's tapped information, not taped as in taped conversation?
    And I guess none of us know when the date of the tapped/taped conversation took place, correct?

    I can't find in the link you sent me much information on the ATM visit. Only that PVS was told they have tapped information on him. I really am interested on what evidence there is about the ATM stop.

    Ado


    Yes, the phone was tapped.  I haven't seen real evidence on the ATM transaction.  There may be some and I haven't seen it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 03:14:39 PM
    Oh no we sprong a leak.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 03:17:08 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Oh no we sprong a leak.


    Uh OH! Break out the pots and pans  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 03:24:09 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Oh no we sprong a leak.


    (http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/tzu/lowres/tzun214l.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 03:33:30 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "San"
    Oh no we sprong a leak.


    Uh OH! Break out the pots and pans  :wink:

    More like towels in my cabinet.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 15, 2007, 03:39:59 PM
    The following blog that was posted at Aruban Boycott site on April 10, 2007 pertains to the topic being discussed.

    Janet

    http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html

    PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT'S DETAINMENT JUSTIFIED


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 15, 2007, 03:52:27 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    From previous thread...Tamikosmom post:  My comments in red.

    Benvinda de Souza - Family Attorney
    Letter to Karen Jansen
    June 23, 2005

    <snipped>

    Also understood by Claudio is that mr. Van Der Sloot said that he picked up Joran around 4:00 am close to McDonald’s.

    <snipped>

    What comes next is the questions that the family wanted answers to:

    <snipped>

    3) Why hasn’t Jug Twitty been interrogated He did give a statement, or did they even ask him for one?

    <snipped>

    Translation Credit - Arubagirl


    At the time of the writing of Benvinda de Souza letter to Karin Janssen ... June 23, 2005 ... Jug Twitty had not been questioned.

    Janet


    Jug Twitty
    On the Record w/ Greta
    September 28, 2005


    TWITTY: I don’t know. I really don’t. I mean, I cannot understand why she can’t communicate with the family, I can’t understand why, you know, she doesn’t take and go back to the beginning and talk to the people that know the answers. There’s a lot of people there that first night. You know, why they didn’t take my statement until 33 days after?


    Jug Twitty
    'Scarborough Country'
    August 11, 2005


    TWITTY: I think, Joe, they need to go back to the beginning and question the people that were with me that night. We have already got conflicting stories now.

    People have changed their statements from the very first night. Those people that were with me that night, had they taken our statements at least a week after it happened, we would have already had the answer. But when they take my statement 33 days later, and they take the other guys‘ statements that were with me and ladies that were with me, you know, like 19 days later, it‘s like they didn‘t want to find the truth.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 04:11:14 PM
    From what I remember of the 4am pick-up is that Beth Holloway
    could not reconcile why Paulus had said that he had picked Joran
    up at McDonalds at 4am (the first night that she arrived and went
    to his house in the wee-hours of the morning looking for Natalee)
    and then changed the time to 11.  :shock:

    It wasn't until the hearing pertaining to the false arrest that we
    heard the he was arrested based on witnesses (the men that had
    driven her to the Sloots) who said that they had heard him say that
    he HAD, indeed, picked Joran up at 4am.  (I'm assuming he was
    barefoot)  :wink:

    Maybe they hadn't gotten their whole story down pat, earlier in
    the day as they sat around the swimming pool and Paulus, the
    mastermind in the COVER-up, MESSED up..... He He He   :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 04:16:35 PM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    The following blog that was posted at Aruban Boycott site on April 10, 2007 pertains to the topic being discussed.

    Janet

    http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html

    PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT'S DETAINMENT JUSTIFIED


    Thanks Tamikosmom,

    So, get this, at that site the translation says taped, not tapped. I wish I knew which it is. And I wish I knew when the tap/tape occured.
    I know some at the morning scene disagree over 11 vs 4. I just want to know what was in the tap/tape, when it occured, and what evidence is there of an ATM visit and just when did the ATM visit occur.

    Thanks Again - Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 04:19:39 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    From what I remember of the 4am pick-up is that Beth Holloway
    could not reconcile why Paulus had said that he had picked Joran
    up at McDonalds at 4am (the first night that she arrived and went
    to his house in the wee-hours of the morning looking for Natalee)
    and then changed the time to 11.  :shock:

    It wasn't until the hearing pertaining to the false arrest that we
    heard the he was arrested based on witnesses (the men that had
    driven her to the Sloots) who said that they had heard him say that
    he HAD, indeed, picked Joran up at 4am.  (I'm assuming he was
    barefoot)  :wink:

    Maybe they hadn't gotten their whole story down pat, earlier in

    the day as they sat around the swimming pool and Paulus, the
    mastermind in the COVER-up, MESSED up..... He He He   :lol:


    Patti,
    In your opinion it was a taped witness interview, not a phone tap?

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 04:25:37 PM
    Perhaps it is because of things like this, specifically, the denial of
    restitution for false arrest, that I think that we may still see justice.

    The 4am pick-up is pivotal, in this case, in my opinion.

    It is also my opinion, that something bad had already happened and
    Joran, shoeless, was seeking out the help of an adult.... like his good
    mommy taught him to do. :smt101

    "Daddy, Somthing Bad Happened"

    "Don't worry, Son, I'll FIX it for you"

    But, first you must tell me where she is....

    (Silence)

    If there is no body, there is no crime...

    (Silence)

    How can I fix it if you don't trust me?

    (Silence)

    It was not until June 10th that Joran finally told where Natalee could
    be found....

    and... she's been MISSING ever since.

    (that's my take)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 04:29:21 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    The following blog that was posted at Aruban Boycott site on April 10, 2007 pertains to the topic being discussed.

    Janet

    http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html

    PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT'S DETAINMENT JUSTIFIED


    Thanks Tamikosmom,

    So, get this, at that site the translation says taped, not tapped. I wish I knew which it is. And I wish I knew when the tap/tape occured.
    I know some at the morning scene disagree over 11 vs 4. I just want to know what was in the tap/tape, when it occured, and what evidence is there of an ATM visit and just when did the ATM visit occur.

    Thanks Again - Ado

    It was confirmed with Jossy by us that it was taped phone conversations, or wire tapped phone conversations.    The information from the front page of SM is directly from Jossy from what he could find out about the court hearing where PVDS lost his case.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 04:30:31 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    From what I remember of the 4am pick-up is that Beth Holloway
    could not reconcile why Paulus had said that he had picked Joran
    up at McDonalds at 4am (the first night that she arrived and went
    to his house in the wee-hours of the morning looking for Natalee)
    and then changed the time to 11.  :shock:

    It wasn't until the hearing pertaining to the false arrest that we
    heard the he was arrested based on witnesses (the men that had
    driven her to the Sloots) who said that they had heard him say that
    he HAD, indeed, picked Joran up at 4am.  (I'm assuming he was
    barefoot)  :wink:

    Maybe they hadn't gotten their whole story down pat, earlier in

    the day as they sat around the swimming pool and Paulus, the
    mastermind in the COVER-up, MESSED up..... He He He   :lol:


    Patti,
    In your opinion it was a taped witness interview, not a phone tap?

    Ado


    Yes, I think it was a witness interview... whether it was taped, I couldn't
    tell you for sure.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 04:31:23 PM
    Posted by RED on February 15, 2007:

    There may have been a typo in today's FP article ... Sentencing of the Superior Court:

    "With attention to the lying declarations that the son of Paulus, Joran Andreas Petrus van der Sloot (hereafter Joran) gave about his last contact on the 30th of May 2005 with the disappeared Natalee Holloway, the suspicion is not unreasonable that he made himself guilty of a conduct that can be qualified as murder, manslaughter, or kidnapping that resulted in death.

    The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway."

    "He" in this instance means Paulus.

    Yes. That's what the Superior Court of Justice dictaminated. There were taps on Paulus' phone and his incoming and outgoing conversations were tapped and listened to. We understand from the sentence that the Prosecution is in possession of all those taps made on the phone(s) of Paulus.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 04:36:50 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by RED on February 15, 2007:

    There may have been a typo in today's FP article ... Sentencing of the Superior Court:

    "With attention to the lying declarations that the son of Paulus, Joran Andreas Petrus van der Sloot (hereafter Joran) gave about his last contact on the 30th of May 2005 with the disappeared Natalee Holloway, the suspicion is not unreasonable that he made himself guilty of a conduct that can be qualified as murder, manslaughter, or kidnapping that resulted in death.

    The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway."

    "He" in this instance means Paulus.

    Yes. That's what the Superior Court of Justice dictaminated. There were taps on Paulus' phone and his incoming and outgoing conversations were tapped and listened to. We understand from the sentence that the Prosecution is in possession of all those taps made on the phone(s) of Paulus.


    So it was a taped interview....

    But... He DIDN'T drop Natalee off at the Holiday Inn.

    In my opinion, the only one left, was Joran:  

    Barefoot, with a black eye!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 04:53:58 PM
    Patti - NO, not a taped interview.  It was wire tapped phone conversations.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 05:04:54 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Patti - NO, not a taped interview.  It was wire tapped phone conversations.


    Do we know the date of the taped tapped phone conversation? Was it the early morning of the 30th or later on in the case?

    I'm still looking around trying to find where the ATM stop claim came from.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 05:09:38 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Patti - NO, not a taped interview.  It was wire tapped phone conversations.


    Do we know the date of the taped tapped phone conversation? Was it the early morning of the 30th or later on in the case?

    I'm still looking around trying to find where the ATM stop claim came from.

    Ado

    I don't think we know the exact date of the wire tapped phone conversations.  The only ATM reference I've seen about PVDS is in the blogs and no article or PV backup that I can remember.  PVDS does talk about going to the bank twice on 5/30 (I believe) in one of his statements.  He does not mention the ATM.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 05:09:55 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Patti - NO, not a taped interview.  It was wire tapped phone conversations.


    Okay.... my mistake.

    But I thought that the man that had provided the investigators with
    the information regarding the 4 am pick-up was one of the men that
    had been with Beth the morning that she was driven to the Sloot's
    house looking for Natalee... is that bogus, as well?

    You know my memory isn't what it used to be... but I am sure that
    Beth had written in her notebook that he had told her, in the presense
    of her assistants, that he had picked "them" up at Mc Donalds and had
    dropped Natalee off at the Holiday Inn at 4am; and that he later changed
    his story to him picking them up at 11  (which in my opinion would also
    have been a lie because Natalee wasn't with Joran at 11pm).


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 05:19:52 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Patti - NO, not a taped interview.  It was wire tapped phone conversations.


    Okay.... my mistake.

    But I thought that the man that had provided the investigators with
    the information regarding the 4 am pick-up was one of the men that
    had been with Beth the morning that she was driven to the Sloot's
    house looking for Natalee... is that bogus, as well?

    You know my memory isn't what it used to be... but I am sure that
    Beth had written in her notebook that he had told her, in the presense
    of her assistants, that he had picked "them" up at Mc Donalds and had
    dropped Natalee off at the Holiday Inn at 4am; and that he later changed
    his story to him picking them up at 11  (which in my opinion would also
    have been a lie because Natalee wasn't with Joran at 11pm).

    I'm not saying that is bogus, what I'm saying is that there are wiretaps on the VDS phone where Paulus is saying he picked up Natalee.  All I'm talking about is those wire taps.  The wire taps is a HUGE DEAL.  They had not become knowledge to any of us until Paulus court hearing in February 2007 where he lost his case.  Which implies that there may be more evidence in the way of wire taps that we are not aware of.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 05:24:08 PM
    Patti - did you see the PHOTO EVALUATION thread?  It's stickied just below this thread.  Sleuth posted some stuff there for you.  She's still working on it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 05:51:54 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Lala's - the courts are looking at "wire tap" evidence.  I suppose if PVDS was talking to someone about it he could have known his phone was tapped and was lying.  How will we know?


    Thanks Klass for the link.

    By wire tapped you mean phone tapped?

    Ane everyone is sure it's tapped information, not taped as in taped conversation?
    And I guess none of us know when the date of the tapped/taped conversation took place, correct?

    I can't find in the link you sent me much information on the ATM visit. Only that PVS was told they have tapped information on him. I really am interested on what evidence there is about the ATM stop.

    Ado


    Yes, the phone was tapped.  I haven't seen real evidence on the ATM transaction.  There may be some and I haven't seen it.


    Klaas,

    It looks like the only mention of a 4 AM ATM visit is someone saying that 2 MB kids claimed they saw Paulus, Joran, and Natalee in a jeep at the ATM at 4.

    It was discussed here back around Feb 14th in the 584 postings IIRC.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 05:56:39 PM
    adoronron - correct on the ATM.  We don't have anything really but internet rumors as far as I know.

    Early in the case there were some posters that were "posing" as MB kids that really weren't.  Some of the things posted by some people claiming to be from MB may or may not be true.  Until I see it in a PV or a declaration from ALE or that Beth and Dave have factual knowledge about it, I take it as rumor.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 06:05:57 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Patti - did you see the PHOTO EVALUATION thread?  It's stickied just below this thread.  Sleuth posted some stuff there for you.  She's still working on it.


    Thanks, Klaas....

    That's why I've been checking in and out.

    I wasn't aware of the thread.

    (Fingers crossed).... (And TOES, too.)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 06:23:35 PM
    OT
     But then again.. when arn't I ? lol

    I belong to a support group online.  Its for the vocal cord problem BS.
     Anyhow every Sunday they meet online in a private chat for an hour. I really have nto been able to make it lately due to work. So there are a few new members. i went today since I was able to for a change.
      One of the members was talking about how she just went to Holland over Easter. Another member said OMG why would you go there after all thats been going on with the girl thats missing from Aruba.
     I almost fell off my chair here.  I spoke up and said I have followed the case as well.  Well this lady was sticking up for Aruba, and Holland and going on and on about corrupt govt's elsewhere. I asked her what exactly did she know about the case? I left a link for SM there and a link to the document threads.. said read it and weep and left.
      I had to leave , she was saying we don't like dutch?  I said thats not it at all. Could not make her get it. So I hope she reads the links I sent to her.
     It was just weird to be in that chat and have her go off about the case?
     :evil:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 06:26:23 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    OT
     But then again.. when arn't I ? lol

    I belong to a support group online.  Its for the vocal cord problem BS.
     Anyhow every Sunday they meet online in a private chat for an hour. I really have nto been able to make it lately due to work. So there are a few new members. i went today since I was able to for a change.
      One of the members was talking about how she just went to Holland over Easter. Another member said OMG why would you go there after all thats been going on with the girl thats missing from Aruba.
     I almost fell off my chair here.  I spoke up and said I have followed the case as well.  Well this lady was sticking up for Aruba, and Holland and going on and on about corrupt govt's elsewhere. I asked her what exactly did she know about the case? I left a link for SM there and a link to the document threads.. said read it and weep and left.
      I had to leave , she was saying we don't like dutch?  I said thats not it at all. Could not make her get it. So I hope she reads the links I sent to her.
     It was just weird to be in that chat and have her go off about the case?
     :evil:

    No kidding!  If you wanted that kind of argument you could just go post at RU, LOL  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 06:30:09 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    OT
     But then again.. when arn't I ? lol

    I belong to a support group online.  Its for the vocal cord problem BS.
     Anyhow every Sunday they meet online in a private chat for an hour. I really have nto been able to make it lately due to work. So there are a few new members. i went today since I was able to for a change.
      One of the members was talking about how she just went to Holland over Easter. Another member said OMG why would you go there after all thats been going on with the girl thats missing from Aruba.
     I almost fell off my chair here.  I spoke up and said I have followed the case as well.  Well this lady was sticking up for Aruba, and Holland and going on and on about corrupt govt's elsewhere. I asked her what exactly did she know about the case? I left a link for SM there and a link to the document threads.. said read it and weep and left.
      I had to leave , she was saying we don't like dutch?  I said thats not it at all. Could not make her get it. So I hope she reads the links I sent to her.
     It was just weird to be in that chat and have her go off about the case?
     :evil:

    No kidding!  If you wanted that kind of argument you could just go post at RU, LOL  :lol:


     ROFL Klaas..
      This chat is about how others are coping with their vocal problems.. and it was all going fine til she mentions going to Holland?  Only myself and the other lady knew what she was talking about, others were like HUH?  lol
     I hope she reads the links I dropped , perhaps she will change her mind.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 06:40:29 PM
    Even if she does look.. maybe the others will take a gander too.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 06:43:39 PM
    Klaas:

    There was, I assume a picture that was posted by Sleuth about which
    she asked, "is this young lady or an old woman".... do you have a copy
    of it?

    Can you post it, here, or repost it there?   I would like to see it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 06:44:52 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Even if she does look.. maybe the others will take a gander too.


    Good Job, Angie!!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 06:46:52 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Even if she does look.. maybe the others will take a gander too.


    Good Job, Angie!!!!


     LOL Patti..
      Well I at LEAST hope the witchy woman that went to Holland looks at Sm at least. The other lady I am sure she will.. since she brought it up first.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 06:47:10 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Klaas:

    There was, I assume a picture that was posted by Sleuth about which
    she asked, "is this young lady or an old woman".... do you have a copy
    of it?

    Can you post it, here, or repost it there?   I would like to see it.


    It's still in that thread.  Here it is.  It's an illusion photo:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/oldlady.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 06:47:47 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    OT
     But then again.. when arn't I ? lol

    I belong to a support group online.  Its for the vocal cord problem BS.
     Anyhow every Sunday they meet online in a private chat for an hour. I really have nto been able to make it lately due to work. So there are a few new members. i went today since I was able to for a change.
      One of the members was talking about how she just went to Holland over Easter. Another member said OMG why would you go there after all thats been going on with the girl thats missing from Aruba.
     I almost fell off my chair here.  I spoke up and said I have followed the case as well.  Well this lady was sticking up for Aruba, and Holland and going on and on about corrupt govt's elsewhere. I asked her what exactly did she know about the case? I left a link for SM there and a link to the document threads.. said read it and weep and left.
      I had to leave , she was saying we don't like dutch?  I said thats not it at all. Could not make her get it. So I hope she reads the links I sent to her.
     It was just weird to be in that chat and have her go off about the case?
     :evil:


     :thumleft:

    She is probably still weeping :smt022


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 06:49:16 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Klaas:

    There was, I assume a picture that was posted by Sleuth about which
    she asked, "is this young lady or an old woman".... do you have a copy
    of it?

    Can you post it, here, or repost it there?   I would like to see it.


    It's still in that thread.  Here it is.  It's an illusion photo:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/oldlady.jpg)


    Maybe I'm missing something here.... All I see is an X - am I supposed
    to open something?  If so, how?

    Also.... what is an illusion photo?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 06:54:14 PM
    :lol:  San


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 06:59:21 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Klaas:

    There was, I assume a picture that was posted by Sleuth about which
    she asked, "is this young lady or an old woman".... do you have a copy
    of it?

    Can you post it, here, or repost it there?   I would like to see it.


    It's still in that thread.  Here it is.  It's an illusion photo:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/oldlady.jpg)


    I don't get it....

    Why would she have asked if it were a young or old woman?

    (I assume that if we ever, really, see a good picture of the body at the
    rocks, there will be some wrinkling of the skin... as well as slippage)

    At this point, I am quite confused... is it that you don't want the picture
    viewed?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 07:10:24 PM
    Sleuth removed the links in the previous thread.  I don't want to start the same argument in this thread.  I think Sleuth was just pointing out we can see different things in photos.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 07:22:31 PM
    I don't want to argue, either....

    But, one of the reasons for her being here in the first place was to take
    a look at the video and determine if there is a body in the bushes and
    rocks that are behind the painter.

    I know what I see, and I know in my heart that what I am seeing is
    real.  That was the purpose of taking a closer look in the first place.

    I hope that she will continue in her evaluation, and I hope that she
    will confirm one way or the other, as it is a key part of the cover-up
    and can be beneficial to the family... isn't that why we are ALL here?

    This IS the sort of thing that could get the investigation back up and
    running again.... to who's benefit would it be to NOT allow such infor-
    mation to be confirmed?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 07:22:55 PM
    I am already sick  but am traumatized and sicker yet  :shock:  :shock:
      Friends of hubby and mine have a 23 yr old son.  He sends an IM every so often and asks how my daughter and step daughter are.
     So he send sme an IM a little bit ago.. asks the same.. then proceeds to say I have a cool video to send I said ok.. , thinking its gonna be in email and I would forward on to the girls.. he dont have their email addy.
      Umm.. so on IM he sends it. I hit accept.. hes dancing.. then all of a sudden he whips it out  :oops:  I hit close.. told him his butt is gonna be in big time trouble. He says I have a crush on you?  :puker:
     OMG I wanna throw up. I am old enough to be this kids mother for God sakes.
      Do I call his mother and tell her what he did?   :oops:
     I am so grossed out.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 07:28:55 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am already sick  but am traumatized and sicker yet  :shock:  :shock:
      Friends of hubby and mine have a 23 yr old son.  He sends an IM every so often and asks how my daughter and step daughter are.
     So he send sme an IM a little bit ago.. asks the same.. then proceeds to say I have a cool video to send I said ok.. , thinking its gonna be in email and I would forward on to the girls.. he dont have their email addy.
      Umm.. so on IM he sends it. I hit accept.. hes dancing.. then all of a sudden he whips it out  :oops:  I hit close.. told him his butt is gonna be in big time trouble. He says I have a crush on you?  :puker:
     OMG I wanna throw up. I am old enough to be this kids mother for God sakes.
      Do I call his mother and tell her what he did?   :oops:
     I am so grossed out.


    Angie - Do you think he's high on something? I can't think any other reason why he would behave in such an outrageous way to a friend of his parents. He can't be thinking straight or he would realize how much trouble he could be in.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 07:29:04 PM
    Angie  :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 07:32:20 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I don't want to argue, either....

    But, one of the reasons for her being here in the first place was to take
    a look at the video and determine if there is a body in the bushes and
    rocks that are behind the painter.


    I know what I see, and I know in my heart that what I am seeing is
    real.  That was the purpose of taking a closer look in the first place.

    I hope that she will continue in her evaluation, and I hope that she
    will confirm one way or the other, as it is a key part of the cover-up
    and can be beneficial to the family... isn't that why we are ALL here?

    This IS the sort of thing that could get the investigation back up and
    running again.... to who's benefit would it be to NOT allow such infor-
    mation to be confirmed?


    Sleuth's reason for being here since June 2005 is the same as all of ours, that's to help get Justice for Natalee.  Her reason is not to analyze photos or anything else unless she chooses to do so.   She was going to look at those screen shots as favor to you and others when she has the time to do it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 07:33:28 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am already sick  but am traumatized and sicker yet  :shock:  :shock:
      Friends of hubby and mine have a 23 yr old son.  He sends an IM every so often and asks how my daughter and step daughter are.
     So he send sme an IM a little bit ago.. asks the same.. then proceeds to say I have a cool video to send I said ok.. , thinking its gonna be in email and I would forward on to the girls.. he dont have their email addy.
      Umm.. so on IM he sends it. I hit accept.. hes dancing.. then all of a sudden he whips it out  :oops:  I hit close.. told him his butt is gonna be in big time trouble. He says I have a crush on you?  :puker:
     OMG I wanna throw up. I am old enough to be this kids mother for God sakes.
      Do I call his mother and tell her what he did?   :oops:
     I am so grossed out.


    That's gross... and I am, often, confronted with the same problem.  There
    are countless young men out there that have a yearning to have an older
    woman.  I have been hit on by my daughter's friends numorous times.  I
    have gone to pick my daughter up from school to find that the next day,
    all the boys at school are telling everyone that Nikki's mom is HOT!  Only
    a couple have, actually, had the nerve to confront me with their fantacies.

    But, I have never had someone send a picture of their, you know what...

    I don't know what I would do... I suppose that it depends on how good of
    friends you are with his parents.  It is sure to ruin your relationship.   In,
    which case, I would say confont him.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 07:44:23 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie  :lol:  :lol:


      Klaas.. I want to crawl under a rock and just die.   Acckkk.
       BT dunno if hes messed up?  
    Patti it is gross.. and I .. OMG.. its .. Eweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
     I blocked him .. esp after he said age dont matter to me?  
       I blocked him from IM.. if he emails me then I may have to call his mom... :(  He must have gotten a new gadget to mess with. One of those camera thingys you put on your desk?   :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 07:49:15 PM
    Angie, you do NOT send your parents friends naked pictures of yourself. Something is definitely up with this kid. Do you still have the video?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 07:51:15 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Klaas:

    There was, I assume a picture that was posted by Sleuth about which
    she asked, "is this young lady or an old woman".... do you have a copy
    of it?

    Can you post it, here, or repost it there?   I would like to see it.


    It's still in that thread.  Here it is.  It's an illusion photo:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/oldlady.jpg)


    Maybe I'm missing something here.... All I see is an X - am I supposed
    to open something?  If so, how?

    Also.... what is an illusion photo?


    Patti, I see the picture. An illusion photo is one where you see a couple of different things depending on how you look at it...I've seen several of them on email out there floating around. Actually I can't see the old woman in this one, I only see the young girl. But I think that illustrates Sleuth's point...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 07:52:48 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"

    Patti, I see the picture. An illusion photo is one where you see a couple of different things depending on how you look at it...I've seen several of them on email out there floating around. Actually I can't see the old woman in this one, I only see the young girl. But I think that illustrates Sleuth's point...


    Mishy,

    I've seen this one before, so I see both women in the picture. To see the old woman, look at the young woman's ear as if it is the old woman's eye, and I think it will fall into place for you.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 07:56:05 PM
    BT, I've seen this one before too and I noticed the ear/eye immediately, but still can't see the old woman.  :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 07:57:34 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    BT, I've seen this one before too and I noticed the ear/eye immediately, but still can't see the old woman.  :oops:


    Okay, try this.  :D

    The ribbon around the young woman's neck is the old woman's mouth, and the young woman's nose is a wart on the old woman's nose. Does that help?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 15, 2007, 07:58:24 PM
    Re. the "two photos" picture - this has been around a long time; I have it and others saved somewhere.

    At one glance, you might see a young girl, a sort of rear profile. Her hair is slightly pulled back. You don't really see her eye, and only a suggestion of a nose. She is wearing a black choker-type ribbon around her neck.

    At another glance, you might see a much older woman, front profile. Her hair is hanging forward. You see one eye, and a large nose. Her MOUTH is the ribbon; prominent chin below it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 07:59:07 PM
    Good Evening, Monkeys,

    I see both the old woman and the young one.  The one woman's nose is the young ones chin.  Her eye is the young one's ear.

    Yes,  I think it is an example of how we can see different things in photos.

    Be that as it may and no matter what we see, the resolution on the photos is not good enough to reopen an investigation especially with ALE.  The vids have been sent to the FBI as well as the photo.  I don't personally think Art Wood would lie to us.

    I think perhaps a fake crime scene was made or being made to help in the framing of the security guards.  

    Keep in mind what was stated by the videographer and posted by Klaas on April 10, 207, right here:

    Quote:

    This was one of the messages on the aru-bay site back in June 2005 prior to the site going down. This message is referencing the lighthouse/rock portion of the videos:

    "Before rumors start we would like to mention that this site was here about a year ago allready..................... This is what we saw yesterday morning......it's mostly uncut video so tell EVERYBODY you can see for yourself what's going on in Aruba at www.aru-bay.com and more keeps comming...............but we had to copyright it (as you will notice when you watch the clips) to prevent them from being mis-used and we tried to blurr out the faces of local and international lawenforcement agents(IF they are but we rather be safe than sorry) .this footage is for personal use only........and due to the seriousness of the situation we did not add any music to these clips.............this footage was taped on the 11th of june 2005 in the early morning hours behind the lighthouse, were the tree suspects .....NOT THE BLACK SECURITY'S WHO WERE ACCUSSED BY THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA (CNN FOX AND OTHERS)BUT this is the area the three who saw her last said they went and EVERYBODY + man's best friend were there on a very VERY low profile so draw your own conclusion......... BUT for official statements let's wait and pray for a positive outcome and why has nobody asked the official spokes people about the bottle of lysol I saw in the Aruba Today Daily News picture in the beginning of the week ???????does it have anything to to with this case?????????????????SO PLEASE .............GO DO YOU JOB WITH REAL FACTS AND INTELLIGENT QUESTIONS AND KEEPING HER LOVED-ONES FEELINGS IN MIND.........AND DON"T MAKE IT A RACIAL THING.............THERE ARE JUST GOOD PEOPLE AND BAD PEOPLE IN EVERY RACE AND COUNTRY.........SO IN CASE YOU DIDN"T KNOW...... NOW YOU KNOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!........... AND MAY GOD BE YOUR GUIDE BEFORE YOU EVER HAVE TO INFORM THE PUBLIC OF ANYTHING AGAIN............................."

    The aru-bay site seems to be upset about the arrest of the security guards.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 15, 2007, 08:00:12 PM
    Incredibly, both females are wearing the same hat ...  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 08:00:42 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "mishy"

    Patti, I see the picture. An illusion photo is one where you see a couple of different things depending on how you look at it...I've seen several of them on email out there floating around. Actually I can't see the old woman in this one, I only see the young girl. But I think that illustrates Sleuth's point...


    Mishy,

    I've seen this one before, so I see both women in the picture. To see the old woman, look at the young woman's ear as if it is the old woman's eye, and I think it will fall into place for you.


    So her point is that two people can look at the same
    picture  and see two different things... right?

    I agree with that.

    I hope that she continues looking at the video, because I am sure
    of what I see... as much as Carpe believes in what he sees.

    This Sleuth....

    She's a smart lady!!!

    Thanks, Mishy and B.T.  

    (sometimes, I'm not so smart)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 15, 2007, 08:01:53 PM
    Hello Everyone

    I finally got in SM on attempt no five and a year later :lol: You guys do some great stuff back here..Thanks for having me.. 8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 08:02:36 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Angie, you do NOT send your parents friends naked pictures of yourself. Something is definitely up with this kid. Do you still have the video?


     Hell no
       I clicked off soon as he whipped out his peep.
     I just told hubby.. he thinks its funny?  :evil:  :evil:
     I always admired this kid too. smart kid.. good job.. great parents.. he ,, at least. I THOUGHT was a nice kid to my girls. And does this?  :?
      Hubby said not to call his mom and dad.  Let it go unless he does it again.  I am so embarassed..  :oops:  :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 08:03:36 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    So her point is that two people can look at the same
    picture  and see two different things... right?

    I agree with that.

    I hope that she continues looking at the video, because I am sure
    of what I see... as much as Carpe believes in what he sees.

    This Sleuth....

    She's a smart lady!!!

    Thanks, Mishy and B.T.  

    (sometimes, I'm not so smart)


    Patti - whether you can see both women or not doesn't have anything to do with being smart (and I'm sure you are smart). It only has to do with how well you can cross your eyes.  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 08:04:18 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hello Everyone

    I finally got in SM on attempt no five and a year later :lol: You guys do some great stuff back here..Thanks for having me.. 8)

    Welcome *******.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 08:05:27 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hello Everyone

    I finally got in SM on attempt no five and a year later :lol: You guys do some great stuff back here..Thanks for having me.. 8)


    Hi ******* and welcome! :smt006


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 08:05:36 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Angie, you do NOT send your parents friends naked pictures of yourself. Something is definitely up with this kid. Do you still have the video?


     Hell no
       I clicked off soon as he whipped out his peep.
     I just told hubby.. he thinks its funny?  :evil:  :evil:
     I always admired this kid too. smart kid.. good job.. great parents.. he ,, at least. I THOUGHT was a nice kid to my girls. And does this?  :?
      Hubby said not to call his mom and dad.  Let it go unless he does it again.  I am so embarassed..  :oops:  :oops:

    Block him from your email and your IM.

    Either he is a nut or an idiot.  Pick one.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 08:06:35 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hello Everyone

    I finally got in SM on attempt no five and a year later :lol: You guys do some great stuff back here..Thanks for having me.. 8)


    WELCOME!!!  Finally!  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:07:32 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    BT, I've seen this one before too and I noticed the ear/eye immediately, but still can't see the old woman.  :oops:


    Okay, try this.  :D

    The ribbon around the young woman's neck is the old woman's mouth, and the young woman's nose is a wart on the old woman's nose. Does that help?


    ahhhhhhhhh, thanks BT  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 08:07:37 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Angie, you do NOT send your parents friends naked pictures of yourself. Something is definitely up with this kid. Do you still have the video?


     Hell no
       I clicked off soon as he whipped out his peep.
     I just told hubby.. he thinks its funny?  :evil:  :evil:
     I always admired this kid too. smart kid.. good job.. great parents.. he ,, at least. I THOUGHT was a nice kid to my girls. And does this?  :?
      Hubby said not to call his mom and dad.  Let it go unless he does it again.  I am so embarassed..  :oops:  :oops:


    Angie - I really think the kid is high on something. I can't think of any other explanation why he would do something so tasteless to a friend of his parents. If I were you, I would IM or email him and tell him if he EVER does anything like that again you're going to give the evidence to his parents.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 08:07:44 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hello Everyone

    I finally got in SM on attempt no five and a year later :lol: You guys do some great stuff back here..Thanks for having me.. 8)


     Hey ******* and welcome!!  :)

      Also in that illusion thing. I only see the young lady.. but. will have to loks again?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 08:08:41 PM
    Fixing dinner, BRB

    Be nice to ******* you guys, OK?  LOL  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 15, 2007, 08:10:17 PM
    ******* - Welcome! Monkeys, this is one of the Boston show demonstrators. And a long-time FP poster.

    Angie - It HAS occurred to you that you are living a very bad soap opera these days, hasn't it?  :lol:  

    Seriously, though, I would keep a wary eye on that guy. ("Kid" is NOT the right word - you said he is 23?) I personally think that at very least, maybe your husband should talk to him RIGHT NOW. Tell him how wildly, inappropriately, over-the-top it was. And that you're SAVING the thing in case it or anything similar ever occurs again, with anyone.

    Talking to parents probably no good. They would likely go into denial.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 08:10:25 PM
    Welcome, *******!

    I have read your posts on the Front Page many times.  Good to see you in the cage.  We are not always as on topic and to the point as the Front Page is but hope you will enjoy being part of our forum.

    (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/47vs1s6_th.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 08:10:44 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Fixing dinner, BRB

    Be nice to ******* you guys, OK?  LOL  :lol:


    As if you'd have to tell us to do that.  :smt110  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 08:12:19 PM
    *******:

    I'm glad you're here, too.


    Mishy and B.T.:  

    I saw the old lady after you pointed it out.... I just didn't know
    the story behind the picture.  I wasn't aware of illusion photos
    and didn't understand the reason for posting it....

    but, now I do.

    Thanks...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:12:39 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hello Everyone

    I finally got in SM on attempt no five and a year later :lol: You guys do some great stuff back here..Thanks for having me.. 8)


    *******, glad to have you!!

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/mazewelc1.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:13:23 PM
    Patti,

    Here's another illusion photo. What does this guy have on his mind?
    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions27.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:14:55 PM
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 08:15:35 PM
    Welcome, *******.  Glad you got in.

    San, I hope your leaks will be fine and that your flooding will not be what they predict.  Ours was a nothing-burger.  Totally wrong and they continue saying it's the worst in 50 years.  BS, we had one 1000 times worse 5 years ago on April 26.

    None, I hope you and all the Carolinians will be safe.  We have lots of friends in the Durham, Raleigh, Wilmington areas and quite a few in South Carolina and Virginia as well.  We will be thinking of you and San and wishing the best for you.

    Angie, two words about this video - law enforcement.  This is a disturbed and potentially dangerous individual.

    Patti, Beth never said that Paulus said he took them to the Holiday Inn as best I recall.  She said that he ''picked them up at 4 a.m."  (I asked immediately who was "them?"  Of course, that was later changed to him picking Joran up at 11 p.m. and Joran sneaking back out with the Car Pool Brothers.  

    I always have and always will believe until someone can prove me wrong, it was the HI and the reason the girly man pissed his pants when Posner called him in and told him to make sure that story was changed immediately and Posner is the one paying the attorney for Guido.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 08:16:44 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)

    I remember it.  I made a comment about Joran and his zits.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 08:17:33 PM
    My hubby is an ass and thinks its funny..  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:
      Gonna drop it.  I'll deal with it accordingly..

      MISHY  ROFLMAO   Ummmmmmmm   :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:18:58 PM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    ******* - Welcome! Monkeys, this is one of the Boston show demonstrators. And a long-time FP poster.

    Angie - It HAS occurred to you that you are living a very bad soap opera these days, hasn't it?  :lol:  

    Seriously, though, I would keep a wary eye on that guy. ("Kid" is NOT the right word - you said he is 23?) I personally think that at very least, maybe your husband should talk to him RIGHT NOW. Tell him how wildly, inappropriately, over-the-top it was. And that you're SAVING the thing in case it or anything similar ever occurs again, with anyone.

    Talking to parents probably no good. They would likely go into denial.


    I agree, MsMarple. They could deny it all they wanted, til they actually saw the video  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  8) But it would probably be good if Ang's hubby would call the boy and ask him what's up with upsetting my wife?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 08:19:19 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Patti,

    Here's another illusion photo. What does this guy have on his mind?
    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions27.gif)


    The same thing as Angie's secret admirer.... sex (naked women)!

    Whew Hooooo!!!

    Got that one fast... the young woman, old woman was a lot harder.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 08:19:34 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)


    Mishy, I don't remember that being in Carpe's screen shots, but I do remember when it was first published. People were saying that it was proof that there had been life on other planets because it was supposed to be a sculpture.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 08:21:19 PM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/possibly_lee_b_1copya.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:22:51 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    My hubby is an ass and thinks its funny..  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:
      Gonna drop it.  I'll deal with it accordingly..

      MISHY  ROFLMAO   Ummmmmmmm   :shock:


    I do believe he's a potentially dangerous individual. Please watch your back...Sex is a major motivator to some...that's a really bold move he made...wonder who else he's exposing himself to uninvited? This is exhibitionism at it's heighth...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 08:23:06 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Welcome, *******.  Glad you got in.

    San, I hope your leaks will be fine and that your flooding will not be what they predict.  Ours was a nothing-burger.  Totally wrong and they continue saying it's the worst in 50 years.  BS, we had one 1000 times worse 5 years ago on April 26.

    None, I hope you and all the Carolinians will be safe.  We have lots of friends in the Durham, Raleigh, Wilmington areas and quite a few in South Carolina and Virginia as well.  We will be thinking of you and San and wishing the best for you.

    Angie, two words about this video - law enforcement.  This is a disturbed and potentially dangerous individual.

    Patti, Beth never said that Paulus said he took them to the Holiday Inn as best I recall.  She said that he ''picked them up at 4 a.m."  (I asked immediately who was "them?"  Of course, that was later changed to him picking Joran up at 11 p.m. and Joran sneaking back out with the Car Pool Brothers.  

    I always have and always will believe until someone can prove me wrong, it was the HI and the reason the girly man pissed his pants when Posner called him in and told him to make sure that story was changed immediately and Posner is the one paying the attorney for Guido.

    Tyler, good to see one of my favorite posters.  The leaks aren't too bad (towels did the job) but we have to do something about it.  I know what the problem is so now I have to call someone to fix it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:23:31 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)

    I remember it.  I made a comment about Joran and his zits.


    What do you make of this, San?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:26:07 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Patti,

    Here's another illusion photo. What does this guy have on his mind?
    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions27.gif)


    The same thing as Angie's secret admirer.... sex (naked women)!

    Whew Hooooo!!!

    Got that one fast... the young woman, old woman was a lot harder.


    Well we know what's on your mind, Patti!! You dirty girl  :shock:

    you know I'm kidding, don't you?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 08:26:28 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)

    I remember it.  I made a comment about Joran and his zits.


    What do you make of this, San?

    Is this a test :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 08:27:48 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    My hubby is an ass and thinks its funny..  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:
      Gonna drop it.  I'll deal with it accordingly..

      MISHY  ROFLMAO   Ummmmmmmm   :shock:


    I do believe he's a potentially dangerous individual. Please watch your back...Sex is a major motivator to some...that's a really bold move he made...wonder who else he's exposing himself to uninvited? This is exhibitionism at it's heighth...

     

     yes it was BOLD.. and I about died.   It wasnt funny.   even after that.. I tryed to be nice and said you are so gonna get yourself in trouble by doing things like that.   :roll:

     MS. yes.. a soap opera. and it sucks and I wouldnt wish any of what I go through on anyone. :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tibrogargan on April 15, 2007, 08:28:22 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)

    I remember it.  I made a comment about Joran and his zits.


    What do you make of this, San?


    I am not San but this is the face on Mars photo taken 1976.  Scientific explanation and lots more photos at
    www.msss.com/education/facepage.face.html


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:28:53 PM
    I'm not testing you, but I wonder if someone is testing us on the video...Can it be fauxtogrpahy just like the shopped pix of Natalee supposedly dancing on the bar at C'nC's?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tibrogargan on April 15, 2007, 08:29:53 PM
    That link does not work. Will go see where I messed up.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:30:56 PM
    Thanks Tibro. That's what that optical site said...but why did I see it in one of Carpe's screen shots? Or am I going bonkers?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tibrogargan on April 15, 2007, 08:31:01 PM
    OK - try this :  www.msss.com/education/facepage/face.html


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 15, 2007, 08:31:48 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Patti,

    Here's another illusion photo. What does this guy have on his mind?
    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions27.gif)


    Thanks for the warm welcome everyone  :)

    That's a pretty unique hairline that guy has. Makes me think of the Paulus clone sitting next to Natalee at the BJ table. :o


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 08:34:15 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    My hubby is an ass and thinks its funny..  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:
      Gonna drop it.  I'll deal with it accordingly..

      MISHY  ROFLMAO   Ummmmmmmm   :shock:


    I do believe he's a potentially dangerous individual. Please watch your back...Sex is a major motivator to some...that's a really bold move he made...wonder who else he's exposing himself to uninvited? This is exhibitionism at it's heighth...

     

     yes it was BOLD.. and I about died.   It wasnt funny.   even after that.. I tryed to be nice and said you are so gonna get yourself in trouble by doing things like that.   :roll:

     MS. yes.. a soap opera. and it sucks and I wouldnt wish any of what I go through on anyone. :(


    At this point, with everything that he said... I'd just ignore him.

    When I told my ex-boyfriend about the those young'uns that came after
    me, he told me to tell them that they aren't "BIG" enough for me.  At the
    time I thought that was a bit egotistical on his part  :shock:   But, later,
    I tried it and it worked.... sure turn off.

     :idea:   Try it next time... they may think that you are real beotch,
    but, it works for me!   :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 08:36:51 PM
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:37:18 PM
    Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
    OK - try this :  www.msss.com/education/facepage/face.html


    Thanks Tib!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tibrogargan on April 15, 2007, 08:37:36 PM
    Yep - that one works.  If computers are as clever as they try to tell us they are, how come they don't know what we mean to type?

    Welcome to *******.  Nice to have you in the cage with us.  It gets wild on the FP sometimes and is usually calmer in here.

    Thank you again monkeys for all your messages.  They have really helped. Will be leaving in a short while and I do drive carefully (well past the age of hooning around)  :wink:

    I will leave a supply of small litter bags by the cage door. (No, they are NOT  barf bags) and if you just pop the banana peels in there that will make it so much easier for Lala's.
    Will miss you guys.   Back Wednesday.

    Mishy - Carpe posted it just to show how things can appear to be different than they really are.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 08:39:24 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?

    (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/opticalillusions39a.jpg)


    Mishy, I don't remember that being in Carpe's screen shots, but I do remember when it was first published. People were saying that it was proof that there had been life on other planets because it was supposed to be a sculpture.


    I posted the pic and linked it to the site that explains it.

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 08:43:22 PM
    TIBRO

      Be safe and sympathy sent to you and hubby and the family  :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tibrogargan on April 15, 2007, 08:44:32 PM
    oops - sorry Carnut.  Of course it was you in the middle of all Carpe's shots.

    Definitely logging out  this time


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 08:45:50 PM
    Take care, Tibro. We'll miss you. See you Wednesday.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 15, 2007, 08:47:27 PM
    klaas & Monkeys - I have about a half dozen of these graphic illusions, in one Word file.

    If we're interested? Can I email the document to klaas? I have problems thinking serially ... about how to get them from Word to SM.

    One of them is the old/young woman we've already seen.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 08:47:29 PM
    I was reading where I left off last night, and there was discussion about a white vehicle and some were wondering what it was.  I think it is a Mitsubishi.  Don't know how to bring things over from other thread-sorry...But wanted to comment on that.  There are cars and such that aren't imported to the U.S., or are sold under different names.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 08:49:00 PM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    klaas & Monkeys - I have about a half dozen of these graphic illusions, in one Word file.

    If we're interested? Can I email the document to klaas? I have problems thinking serially ... about how to get them from Word to SM.

    One of them is the old/young woman we've already seen.


    msmarple - I don't think that's necessary do you?  Any of us can google illusion photos and find some.  No need to post any more here, IMO.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 08:50:37 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I was reading where I left off last night, and there was discussion about a white vehicle and some were wondering what it was.  I think it is a Mitsubishi.  Don't know how to bring things over from other thread-sorry...But wanted to comment on that.  There are cars and such that aren't imported to the U.S., or are sold under different names.


    (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/VDSlootcar3.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 08:52:38 PM
    Optical illusions?

    here's another lady pic, only there's 3 faces in this one.

    (http://eyetricks.com/0201.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 08:54:10 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:56:11 PM
    Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
    Yep - that one works.  If computers are as clever as they try to tell us they are, how come they don't know what we mean to type?

    Welcome to *******.  Nice to have you in the cage with us.  It gets wild on the FP sometimes and is usually calmer in here.

    Thank you again monkeys for all your messages.  They have really helped. Will be leaving in a short while and I do drive carefully (well past the age of hooning around)  :wink:

    I will leave a supply of small litter bags by the cage door. (No, they are NOT  barf bags) and if you just pop the banana peels in there that will make it so much easier for Lala's.
    Will miss you guys.   Back Wednesday.

    Mishy - Carpe posted it just to show how things can appear to be different than they really are.


    ahhhhh, thanks Tibro...always the voice of reason  :lol: Be safe in your travels....we'll miss you!!!!!! Hooning around, huh? I need to go look at  your Ozzie threads to see if I can find any slang references  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 08:56:34 PM
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 08:56:37 PM
    Hi Mishy!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 08:57:10 PM
    Angie:

    One more point that I want to make is that our men are usually the
    last ones to come to the rescue in cases like this... Don't give him a
    hard time about it.  THey always assume:

    First,  that we are telling them about these things to make them jealous
    and
    Second, they expect us to handle our own problems of unwanted advances.  

    For what ever reason, and maybe one of the guys know more about it
    than I, they don't want to hear about it.

    Again, My ex-boyfriend armed me well, in dealing with unwanted advances from "Little Boys" or those much younger...

    Too bad that wasn't the first thing out of your mouth as I would imagine
    that his concept of women getting weak in the knees at the very sight
    would have vanished.

    Signed:

    Anne Launders.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: igsigs on April 15, 2007, 08:57:45 PM
    Latest Jossy/Easy

    Nothing to report about the Dutch team of investigators coming out of Aruba at this time and nothing expected over the weekend. Some believe their purpose in Aruba is a mixed one and involves the recent issues of bribery and corruption on the island. More should be learned in the following days and weeks.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:57:56 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    OK, I've just gone off on an illusion photo tangent on the internet and found this picture that I could swear was in one of the videos of the rocks, for I saw it in Carpe's screen shots last week. On this illusion site, it said this picture was made on the moon in the 70s. Anybody else remember it from Carpe's screen shots?



    Mishy, I don't remember that being in Carpe's screen shots, but I do remember when it was first published. People were saying that it was proof that there had been life on other planets because it was supposed to be a sculpture.


    I posted the pic and linked it to the site that explains it.

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm


    DOH! Thanks Carnut...that's what I get for not being on here regularly!! Thanks for clearing that up  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 08:59:11 PM
    Indy,

    Yes, I believe he was even told he had no room to say anybody else had said something stupid considering the mess he had created with Natalee's disappearance.

    I took that as a sort of thinly veiled threat or perhaps letting Paulus know that he does not lead a charmed life and it is only available to him as long as he keeps his mouth shut.  Don't make waves for us Paulus or you can be made to regret it is what I heard in that.

     :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 08:59:18 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiay Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 08:59:38 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Hi Mishy!!


    Hey buddy  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 09:02:31 PM
    Thanks Iggy. I know we are all eager to hear something regarding these 10 investigators and their purpose in visiting the island...

    Patty, great advice. Men who are secure in their relationship with a woman don't feel the need to show their machismo by confronting another male and feel like the woman can do just fine on her own...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:02:34 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hope you have a great vacation Hotshot!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 09:02:40 PM
    Quote from: "igsigs"
    Latest Jossy/Easy

    Nothing to report about the Dutch team of investigators coming out of Aruba at this time and nothing expected over the weekend. Some believe their purpose in Aruba is a mixed one and involves the recent issues of bribery and corruption on the island. More should be learned in the following days and weeks.



    Thanks for the update, Igs,

    Any shred of information is very appreciated.   And I assume we are talking about the bribery of the million florins that Jossy was talking about in his paper?  I wish it were corruption in the investigation of what happened to Natalee instead.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 09:03:00 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Indy,

    Yes, I believe he was even told he had no room to say anybody else had said something stupid considering the mess he had created with Natalee's disappearance.

    I took that as a sort of thinly veiled threat or perhaps letting Paulus know that he does not lead a charmed life and it is only available to him as long as he keeps his mouth shut.  Don't make waves for us Paulus or you can be made to regret it is what I heard in that.

     :?

    Hi Anna,
    Yes I agree, I think the power structure was putting Paulus in his place that day.  I think the message was that PVDS has no more cards to play.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 09:03:15 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiay Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.
     Hey Indy, Thanks.  I am glad to see someone approves with what I/We did, there is a site out there that is given me a lickin about it.  Sad thing is, one of them even write on this board.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 09:04:04 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hope you have a great vacation Hotshot!

    Thanks so much Klaas!!  I'll say Hi to Mickey for you.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 09:04:16 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Thanks Iggy. I know we are all eager to hear something regarding these 10 investigators and their purpose in visiting the island...

    Patty, great advice. Men who are secure in their relationship with a woman don't feel the need to show their machismo by confronting another male and feel like the woman can do just fine on her own...



    Mishy,
    Could also be they are just too lazy to get involved,lol!!

    Just kidding, guys!

    . :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:04:33 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hope you have a great vacation Hotshot!

    Thanks so much Klaas!!  I'll say Hi to Mickey for you.

    Disneyworld or Disneyland?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 09:05:28 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hope you have a great vacation Hotshot!

    Thanks so much Klaas!!  I'll say Hi to Mickey for you.

    Disneyworld or Disneyland?

    Disneyworld :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:06:39 PM
    Hotshot - well have a great time.  I've never actually been in Disneyworld, only Disneyland.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: JusticeforNatalee on April 15, 2007, 09:07:46 PM
    Have a great time, Hotshot!
     :D  :D  :D  :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 09:09:10 PM
    Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
    Have a great time, Hotshot!
     :D  :D  :D  :D
    Hey Thanks!  How have you been?  I have missed you lately.  What is the whole crew here?  Wheres Richard?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:09:21 PM
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 15, 2007, 09:09:29 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".



    LOL Indy, they did everything but make him take the robe off. Am sure they all felt uncomfortable sitting there with a slimeball that has made them all look like a bunch of quacks.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 09:11:14 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Really don't think it's funny, something ought to be done about it.

    It's not like it's just your problem, you may not even be the first or the last to be confronted in such a way by the jerk.

    Jerk really needs a reality check from someone.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 09:12:26 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiya Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.
     Hey Indy, Thanks.  I am glad to see someone approves with what I/We did, there is a site out there that is given me a lickin about it.  Sad thing is, one of them even write on this board.

    Hots,
    I don't think I'm the only one who approved, I think there's a grassroots-groundswell of supporters who are going to haunt the Aruban tourism-spin machine everytime they try to sell their smack here.
    I'm curious about who here would find anything wrong with that?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 09:13:01 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".



    LOL Indy, they did everything but make him take the robe off. Am sure they all felt uncomfortable sitting there with a slimeball that has made them all look like a bunch of quacks.


    So why does he get to just sit there? Is chastizing all 'the powers that be' can do about it?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 15, 2007, 09:13:53 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.


    Ahh thanks...Goin on Vacation eh?? You score on some tickets at the boston travel show or somethin?? I'M drooling over the scotland brochures myself 8)

    Man these monkey's move fast back here I cant keep up..lol


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 15, 2007, 09:14:15 PM
    Quote from: "igsigs"
    Latest Jossy/Easy

    Nothing to report about the Dutch team of investigators coming out of Aruba at this time and nothing expected over the weekend. Some believe their purpose in Aruba is a mixed one and involves the recent issues of bribery and corruption on the island. More should be learned in the following days and weeks.



    Thanks Igsigs. At least they are manipulating the media cycle like those twerps from AHATA and the Strategic Farce Force used to do on Friday afternoons.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 09:14:24 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Yo Angie!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 09:16:13 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiya Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.
     Hey Indy, Thanks.  I am glad to see someone approves with what I/We did, there is a site out there that is given me a lickin about it.  Sad thing is, one of them even write on this board.

    Hots,
    I don't think I'm the only one who approved, I think there's a grassroots-groundswell of supporters who are going to haunt the Aruban tourism-spin machine everytime they try to sell their smack here.
    I'm curious about who here would find anything wrong with that?

    I can't and wont mention any names, but let me say, It shocked the hell outta me.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 15, 2007, 09:16:15 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".



    LOL Indy, they did everything but make him take the robe off. Am sure they all felt uncomfortable sitting there with a slimeball that has made them all look like a bunch of quacks.


    So why does he get to just sit there? Is chastizing all 'the powers that be' can do about it?



    They already twisted their laws to save him so they're stuck with him. For now.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 15, 2007, 09:18:18 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.


    Ahh thanks...Goin on Vacation eh?? You score on some tickets at the boston travel show or somethin?? I'M drooling over the scotland brochures myself 8)

    Man these monkey's move fast back here I cant keep up..lol
    LOL, no I didn't score at the show, plans were made way back in december.  We go every year, and the way things are going here at home, it may be the last year.  So I am going to enjoy every single minute I have while there.  OK, off to pack a bit more.  I'll see you guys a bit later...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 09:18:26 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.


    LOL Indy, they did everything but make him take the robe off. Am sure they all felt uncomfortable sitting there with a slimeball that has made them all look like a bunch of quacks.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:19:46 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Really don't think it's funny, something ought to be done about it.

    It's not like it's just your problem, you may not even be the first or the last to be confronted in such a way by the jerk.

    Jerk really needs a reality check from someone.


      Kid needs bitch slapped IMO  :evil:
     On and BTW,. I figured out how to use my scanner..  had to load additional shit on my pc.  :roll:
      if the day comes you ever have to use VISTA Mr Carnut. please let me know, and what you think about it. Bet you hate it too. dont care how smart anyone is on a PC.. if you dont got it.. you dont know what a true pain in the ass it is.  :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:23:55 PM
    Angie - what did you have to load?  Just curious.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 15, 2007, 09:25:00 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.
     



    Was this before or after he got exposed for telling a lie in that wiretap? I'll bet they scatter when he sits down at the table with the coffee clatch now.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 09:26:22 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiya Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.
     Hey Indy, Thanks.  I am glad to see someone approves with what I/We did, there is a site out there that is given me a lickin about it.  Sad thing is, one of them even write on this board.

    Hots,
    I don't think I'm the only one who approved, I think there's a grassroots-groundswell of supporters who are going to haunt the Aruban tourism-spin machine everytime they try to sell their smack here.
    I'm curious about who here would find anything wrong with that?

    I can't and wont mention any names, but let me say, It shocked the hell outta me.

    I'll just say this and let it go, it'd be nice to know and nice to let the other person give their position.  That's the way disagreements are settled.
    I sometimes write some stupid responses and stay awake all night worrying about if I offended anyone.  
    I think sometimes the friction here among us is just not being on top of our game when making a point.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:28:14 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - what did you have to load?  Just curious.

     Klass I loaded the disc  for the printer.. and it said it wasn't working with VISTA.. sent me a link to a site where I had to load drivers and more software. I did all that..  I scanned a photo.. tat worked ..was gona try to email it for a test.. but NOW its not working with AOL or my dsl addy.
      :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  Says I need a MSN or hotmail addy?  grrrrrrrr
     Figure out one thing., and got another problem.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:28:40 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.
     



    Was this before or after he got exposed for telling a lie in that wiretap? I'll bet they scatter when he sits down at the table with the coffee clatch now.

    This meeting where he got "slapped" was about 30 after he lost his case in court where we heard about the wire taps.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:30:18 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - what did you have to load?  Just curious.

     Klass I loaded the disc  for the printer.. and it said it wasn't working with VISTA.. sent me a link to a site where I had to load drivers and more software. I did all that..  I scanned a photo.. tat worked ..was gona try to email it for a test.. but NOW its not working with AOL or my dsl addy.
      :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  Says I need a MSN or hotmail addy?  grrrrrrrr
     Figure out one thing., and got another problem.

    Ok..I figured it was something like that.  So you needed to load the software disc that came with your scanner (should have been done by Best Buy) then you had to update the drivers for Vista (should have been done by Best Buy)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 15, 2007, 09:31:42 PM
    checking out friends, be back in the AM to catch up.  Thanks for having me.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:31:42 PM
    Angie - that's probably something in the setup of the software disc you just loaded.  You might be able to go into the software and check in the setting area.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:31:59 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    checking out friends, be back in the AM to catch up.  Thanks for having me.

    Nite Indy


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 15, 2007, 09:34:10 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.
     



    Was this before or after he got exposed for telling a lie in that wiretap? I'll bet they scatter when he sits down at the table with the coffee clatch now.

    This meeting where he got "slapped" was about 30 after he lost his case in court where we heard about the wire taps.



    Thanks Klaas. That explains the chilly reception. Makes those early judgements in his favor look all the more suspect, something I am sure they are none too comfortable with.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:34:14 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - what did you have to load?  Just curious.

     Klass I loaded the disc  for the printer.. and it said it wasn't working with VISTA.. sent me a link to a site where I had to load drivers and more software. I did all that..  I scanned a photo.. tat worked ..was gona try to email it for a test.. but NOW its not working with AOL or my dsl addy.
      :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  Says I need a MSN or hotmail addy?  grrrrrrrr
     Figure out one thing., and got another problem.

    Ok..I figured it was something like that.  So you needed to load the software disc that came with your scanner (should have been done by Best Buy) then you had to update the drivers for Vista (should have been done by Best Buy)


     Yep.. you got it! They ripped me off IMO  :evil:  I so wanna swear bad right now.. but I am behaving..lol


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:35:12 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    checking out friends, be back in the AM to catch up.  Thanks for having me.

     

     Night Indy..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 09:36:43 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.
     


    Was this before or after he got exposed for telling a lie in that wiretap? I'll bet they scatter when he sits down at the table with the coffee clatch now.

    Paulus is a rat.  He has made it known he would tell on certain people.  That's why he made that comment "a lot of people would get hurt".  That was his way of saying I got the good on you.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:39:41 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - that's probably something in the setup of the software disc you just loaded.  You might be able to go into the software and check in the setting area.


     The disc was loaded a week or so ago for the printer to work..lol
      I re loaded it again.. and it took me to a website to load the drivers and others things for the scanner/copier to work.  
     I guess there is alot of updates to follow up with .. still sucks IMO that this version of windows is out there and its not all up to date.  :evil:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 09:41:55 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiay Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.
     Hey Indy, Thanks.  I am glad to see someone approves with what I/We did, there is a site out there that is given me a lickin about it.  Sad thing is, one of them even write on this board.


     :shock:  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:44:05 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    Hey *******.....I see you finally made it.  Nice to have you join us :lol: I would stay and chat but I am doing my last minute packing....I'll be back later.  Just wanted to welcome you.

    Hiay Hotshot -- and *******.  You guys are still hero's in my book. It takes a special person to actually come out from behind the keyboard and stand up for what they believe in.  Thank you both.
     Hey Indy, Thanks.  I am glad to see someone approves with what I/We did, there is a site out there that is given me a lickin about it.  Sad thing is, one of them even write on this board.


     :shock:  :shock:


     HUH?   :shock:  I am lost now for sure?  WTH?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 15, 2007, 09:44:38 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.
     


    Was this before or after he got exposed for telling a lie in that wiretap? I'll bet they scatter when he sits down at the table with the coffee clatch now.


    Paulus is a rat.  He has made it known he would tell on certain people.  That's why he made that comment "a lot of people would get hurt".  That was his way of saying I got the good on you.



    Yep San, a not so veiled threat to let his chums know he'll drop a dime on them if they convict him. He's probably got half the guys in that room by the cods for other stuff. Small island, and they wouldn't have all the drug and money laundering problems they do if they were running it on the up and up.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 09:44:40 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Really don't think it's funny, something ought to be done about it.

    It's not like it's just your problem, you may not even be the first or the last to be confronted in such a way by the jerk.

    Jerk really needs a reality check from someone.


    I don't think it's funny either, Carnut...like I said, I wonder who else he'll expose himself to unwelcomed? It's like a flasher...you don't ask for it...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 09:46:50 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Really don't think it's funny, something ought to be done about it.

    It's not like it's just your problem, you may not even be the first or the last to be confronted in such a way by the jerk.

    Jerk really needs a reality check from someone.


    I don't think it's funny either, Carnut...like I said, I wonder who else he'll expose himself to unwelcomed? It's like a flasher...you don't ask for it...


    I'd call the cops and show them the video.  Let them discuss it with him.  Next time it may be a seven year old or who knows?  But he has that video for a reason and I doubt this is the only time he will use it.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 09:48:49 PM
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:49:05 PM
    I am lost? so Hotshot is sayimg that someone from here on SM writes on a board?
      WHAT BOARD?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 15, 2007, 09:49:05 PM
    Hi everyone,

    Angie, the way modern technology has been treating you lately, it's a wonder you don't pull the plug on all of it and move off to Idaho somewhere where no PC, cellphone, IM, what-have-you can ever hope to trace you down!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:50:19 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado

    Yes, Anna and Tylergal are real good at remember those details from early in the case.  I think the ATM rumor may have been started at RWV though, not RU.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 09:51:24 PM
    Anna, I know I would wanna do something that would scare the chit out of him to make him think twice about doing that again. He needs to be knocked down a few notches, as Carnut said. He must think he's all that showing people what he has/hasn't got...He needs to learn that responsible adults don't do that kind of stuff anymore and that there are consequences to behavior that is outside of societies social mores. It is anything but funny and certainly not harmless, IMHO. OK, rant over...gotta go get the kids ready for bed, shower, and have some "me" time...I'll try to check in sometime this week...Hugs and prayers for all the monkeys!!! Sleep well and keep the faith!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 15, 2007, 09:51:34 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.


    LOL Indy, they did everything but make him take the robe off. Am sure they all felt uncomfortable sitting there with a slimeball that has made them all look like a bunch of quacks.


    Nice signature Dan 8) I was thinking about MD'S Dads post on the FP."The fascinating thing is that there has been someone on Aruba that actually wants Paulus hung for his crimes.."I couldnt help but day dream--Failed judge hung in Oranjestad for his crimes against his country and a american tourist. :twisted:

    In all seriousness I think that was a warning that he has gone too far. I think they have a Van Der Sloot file filled with phone records,signed statements,wire taps,real evidence..etc..That was never given to the dutch. The MEP will keep it in a safe spot just in case they ever need to drop the ball on the sloots.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 09:52:23 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Kathy have a great vacation.. I hope the weather is nice .

    Howdy INdy

    Patti.. not hubby is not jealous of a 23 yr old..  not at all.
     He is just a simpleton.. and thinks it all funny.  :roll:  :roll:


    Really don't think it's funny, something ought to be done about it.

    It's not like it's just your problem, you may not even be the first or the last to be confronted in such a way by the jerk.

    Jerk really needs a reality check from someone.


    I don't think it's funny either, Carnut...like I said, I wonder who else he'll expose himself to unwelcomed? It's like a flasher...you don't ask for it...


    Yep, online flashing would seem to be as much of a crime as 'real' life flashing.

    Heck if you can call the cops on the 'stalker girl' you oughta be doing the same for this 'flasher'.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:53:12 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.

    Boy this has to be one of the worst days in Paulus's life, called out by one of his peers saying basically "we all know what you and your son did and you should be very humble that you've been given a free pass, Don't make waves or we can make the tide very uncomfortable for you".

    Yeah, you can almost see and feel his pain even from behind.  Just look at his language, looks like a little school boy who got reprimanded by one of his teachers.


    LOL Indy, they did everything but make him take the robe off. Am sure they all felt uncomfortable sitting there with a slimeball that has made them all look like a bunch of quacks.


    Nice signature Dan 8) I was thinking about MD'S Dads post on the FP."The fascinating thing is that there has been someone on Aruba that actually wants Paulus hung for his crimes.."I couldnt help but day dream--Failed judge hung in Oranjestad for his crimes against his country and a american tourist. :twisted:

    In all seriousness I think that was a warning that he has gone too far. I think they have a Van Der Sloot file filled with phone records,signed statements,wire taps,real evidence..etc..That was never given to the dutch. The MEP will keep it in a safe spot just in case they ever need to drop the ball on the sloots.


    I agree  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:53:35 PM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Hi everyone,

    Angie, the way modern technology has been treating you lately, it's a wonder you don't pull the plug on all of it and move off to Idaho somewhere where no PC, cellphone, IM, what-have-you can ever hope to trace you down!

     
    Id love to move trust me.
     And what happend tonight was gross beyond belief.
     Its upsetting to me that its a friend of ours son.. who we have known for years.  Thats the sick part. I dont even wanna think about it.. honestly.
      I have been biting my tounge.. and not calling his mom .
     

     I am still ost on what Hotshot posted about someone form here wriing on a board?   I must have mised something?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 15, 2007, 09:54:14 PM
    Ang, Hotshot is saying that someone on this forum disagrees with her visit to the Boston convention center a few weeks ago protesting Aruba's exhibit...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 15, 2007, 09:55:01 PM
    There is also a rumor that some of the MB guys remember seeing PVDS in the vicinity of MickeyD's at aound 4 AM. That, coupled with the Aruban Supreme Court statement and the possible ATM stop, is beginning to take on some weight of attestation. Coming from 3 sources like that, there might be a ring of truth there.

    But it is all still just RUMOR, not proven by any means.

    I really don't think it was necessary for PVDS to go anywhere near the beach area that night. I think it all went down near the VDS home.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 09:55:42 PM
    Quote from: "*******"

    In all seriousness I think that was a warning that he has gone too far. I think they have a Van Der Sloot file filled with phone records,signed statements,wire taps,real evidence..etc..That was never given to the dutch. The MEP will keep it in a safe spot just in case they ever need to drop the ball on the sloots.


    Ah, if killing tourism and giving Aruba a bad name throughout the civilized world isn't enough to drop the ball on the sloots, what is?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 09:56:54 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "sb"
    Hi everyone,

    Angie, the way modern technology has been treating you lately, it's a wonder you don't pull the plug on all of it and move off to Idaho somewhere where no PC, cellphone, IM, what-have-you can ever hope to trace you down!

     
    Id love to move trust me.
     And what happend tonight was gross beyond belief.
     Its upsetting to me that its a friend of ours son.. who we have known for years.  Thats the sick part. I dont even wanna think about it.. honestly.
      I have been biting my tounge.. and not calling his mom .
     

     I am still ost on what Hotshot posted about someone form here wriing on a board?   I must have mised something?

    Angie - did you say this kid is 23?  Unfortunately, he is an adult in the eyes of the law and so are you.  I actually doubt if you called the cops they would do anything.  Don't get me wrong, what he did was really sick, I just don't think there's alot you can do.  If he's still living with his parents, about the only thing you could do is let them know what he's doing from THEIR home.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 09:57:40 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado



    Ado,
    I will try to recall where that rumor came from but it predates RU and also the taking of statements from the MB kids, it was a very early one.  And supposedly not just one withdrawal but two and the ATM near McDonalds at that.

    But from the fauxphotoing , we can see that by July, 2005, they were in full decoy form already.  It may be total fabrication but it was out there before any MB kids said they saw him.

    Very odd how absolutely NONE of the video cameras seem to have been working that night and there is no video of anything, isn't it?  I'd fire my security firm for that.  Seriously, by the time Beth got around to asking for videos from all the various places, they had already recorded over or their cameras were mysteriously not working that particular night.

    I have always found that odd, how many cameras supposedly did not work.  But Paulus banking records should address this question so we have to assume that ALE knows whether this was true or a decoy.

    If I can recall where I first heard that, I will post it but know it was pre RU existence and before MB kids statements were taken.  In other words, true or not, it came from Aruba.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 09:57:52 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Ang, Hotshot is saying that someone on this forum disagrees with her visit to the Boston convention center a few weeks ago protesting Aruba's exhibit...


     Well that sucks.. Its awesome  that all 5 went there.
     So if someone wants to bitch about it and they post here? Why not have the nads to say it up front?  At keast they went..  how can someone make fun of that?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 15, 2007, 09:58:04 PM
    Angie, count me with those who think you need to tell someone about what he did. That was disturbing.

    Is there any chance at all it was meant for your daughters instead of you (not that that makes it any better)?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 09:59:04 PM
    The powers that be were not chastising Paulus for the sake of decency...it was all done for show.  They know that he holds all the cards still where they are concerned.  He has worked in the secret corners of their judiciary for years.  He knows things about people in the Netherlands as well as Aruba.  No one has a kid that has done the things Joran has done and continues to do without having the "goods" on a lot of people.  An underage boy can not gamble in a casino with a line of credit without the people in power allowing it.  That includes the casino owners and the government.  It goes to the corruption.  

    Most people think I believe that the actual demise of Natalee was a complicated thing, but it wasn't.  I have stayed within the simple mindset about her death.  It was the circumstances and subsequent cover up that becomes the problem.  For the truth about what happened to Natalee to come out the world would need to see what other skeletons are buried in Aruba's closets.

    Excuse my manners, hello everyone!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 15, 2007, 10:00:18 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"

    Angie - did you say this kid is 23?  Unfortunately, he is an adult in the eyes of the law and so are you.  I actually doubt if you called the cops they would do anything.  Don't get me wrong, what he did was really sick, I just don't think there's alot you can do.  If he's still living with his parents, about the only thing you could do is let them know what he's doing from THEIR home.


    I am not sure that there aren't laws against using cellphones for transmission of obscene materials. Just like regular phones.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:01:07 PM
    they get her into the car with a LIE about "oh we also are staying in the hotel, we are just visiting aruba also"   :roll:

    go to somewhere, maybe the lighthouse area, or somewhere like that

    they rape her, take pictures,  joran had his clothes off including the sneakers,

    she passed out from the drugs

    they panic... because they gave her the drugs

    they bury her, using the sneaker as a GENERAL MARKER

    the other sneaker was left in the K2 car, they still have it somewhere

    they leave her,,,,  and k2 take the KILLER home

    killer gets daddy sloot to help him..

    pappa sloot drives to take care of the body...with joran killer at home on computer


    it aint rocket science, the lies started too early and had to keep changing
    as the story made no sense at every turn


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:02:40 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "sb"
    Hi everyone,

    Angie, the way modern technology has been treating you lately, it's a wonder you don't pull the plug on all of it and move off to Idaho somewhere where no PC, cellphone, IM, what-have-you can ever hope to trace you down!

     
    Id love to move trust me.
     And what happend tonight was gross beyond belief.
     Its upsetting to me that its a friend of ours son.. who we have known for years.  Thats the sick part. I dont even wanna think about it.. honestly.
      I have been biting my tounge.. and not calling his mom .
     

     I am still ost on what Hotshot posted about someone form here wriing on a board?   I must have mised something?

    Angie - did you say this kid is 23?  Unfortunately, he is an adult in the eyes of the law and so are you.  I actually doubt if you called the cops they would do anything.  Don't get me wrong, what he did was really sick, I just don't think there's alot you can do.  If he's still living with his parents, about the only thing you could do is let them know what he's doing from THEIR home.


     Yes Klaas.. he is 23.. same age as my daughter,  and an adult.
       and YES my kid has the stalker chicky after him.. alot different to who posted that.
         Alot of things dont bother me.. but this did. So.. once I calm done over it.. i will decide what to do.  His mom is sweet.. and if she sknows he is usig his web cam to send icky stuff.. I can bet she kicks his ass.. not only her.. but his dad.!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:04:00 PM
    Angie
    What if this guy starts doing this stuff with young boys?   Him being an adult, I would email him and tell him that you saved the video and he's now on notice that if you ever have any more problems with him...it's gonna be the police at his  door next time.


    What is it with you?  Do you just attract weirdos? (Angie knows what I mean by this and it won't make her mad, trust me.  :wink: )


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 10:06:20 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Angie
    What if this guy starts doing this stuff with young boys?   Him being an adult, I would email him and tell him that you saved the video and he's now on notice that if you ever have any more problems with him...it's gonna be the police at his  door next time.


    What is it with you?  Do you just attract weirdos? (Angie knows what I mean by this and it won't make her mad, trust me.  :wink: )


    Sister Lalas - I agree with putting him on notice. He is an adult and should be responsible for his own actions. He needs to know that Angie isn't going to tolerate such behavior.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 10:06:37 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "*******"

    In all seriousness I think that was a warning that he has gone too far. I think they have a Van Der Sloot file filled with phone records,signed statements,wire taps,real evidence..etc..That was never given to the dutch. The MEP will keep it in a safe spot just in case they ever need to drop the ball on the sloots.


    Ah, if killing tourism and giving Aruba a bad name throughout the civilized world isn't enough to drop the ball on the sloots, what is?


    I think those who are corrupt are making just as much money without tourism and care far more about their own hides than the good of the island,  In my most humble opinion, naming names and crimes and bribes of members of MEP would be considered a far more serious misdeed in their eyes, things for which people could be fined and serve jail terms and such as that.  He is pretty safe since Aruba conveniently doesn't have in place any anti-corruption laws but in their stead those of Holland should apply.

    If he were to name a few names, I would be all kinds of "real" evidence would start to surface.  Paulus will be very, very quiet if he is smart.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:07:38 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    they get her into the car with a LIE about "oh we also are staying in the hotel, we are just visiting aruba also"   :roll:

    go to somewhere, maybe the lighthouse area, or somewhere like that

    they rape her, take pictures,  joran had his clothes off including the sneakers,

    she passed out from the drugs

    they panic... because they gave her the drugs

    they bury her, using the sneaker as a GENERAL MARKER

    the other sneaker was left in the K2 car, they still have it somewhere

    they leave her,,,,  and k2 take the KILLER home

    killer gets daddy sloot to help him..

    pappa sloot drives to take care of the body...with joran killer at home on computer


    it aint rocket science, the lies started too early and had to keep changing
    as the story made no sense at every turn



    beech story was a LOAD of horse manure


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 10:09:48 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    The powers that be were not chastising Paulus for the sake of decency...it was all done for show.  They know that he holds all the cards still where they are concerned.  He has worked in the secret corners of their judiciary for years.  He knows things about people in the Netherlands as well as Aruba.  No one has a kid that has done the things Joran has done and continues to do without having the "goods" on a lot of people.  An underage boy can not gamble in a casino with a line of credit without the people in power allowing it.  That includes the casino owners and the government.  It goes to the corruption.  

    Most people think I believe that the actual demise of Natalee was a complicated thing, but it wasn't.  I have stayed within the simple mindset about her death.  It was the circumstances and subsequent cover up that becomes the problem.  For the truth about what happened to Natalee to come out the world would need to see what other skeletons are buried in Aruba's closets.

    Excuse my manners, hello everyone!

    Lala's I agree.  I have kept it simple on how Natalee died.  It was murder at the "hands" of Joran.  You are correct that it was everything that happened afterwards that made it big.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:14:01 PM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Angie, count me with those who think you need to tell someone about what he did. That was disturbing.

    Is there any chance at all it was meant for your daughters instead of you (not that that makes it any better)?

     
    It may have been meant for my daughter or step daughter? I dunno?
      He dont have either one of their IM's since they bno longer reside here.
     They have mine. his mom and dad both ..and my hubbys.
    Yes it was diturbing. I am sick anyhow.. and to have my firends son flash  his peep.. it was a web cam.. all real time. the dancing was funny.. but then the peep shot.. I saw that and clciked off.. and scolded him.
     I probaly shouldnt have posted  about it to begin with.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 10:14:21 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "robots"
    they get her into the car with a LIE about "oh we also are staying in the hotel, we are just visiting aruba also"   :roll:

    go to somewhere, maybe the lighthouse area, or somewhere like that

    they rape her, take pictures,  joran had his clothes off including the sneakers,

    she passed out from the drugs

    they panic... because they gave her the drugs

    they bury her, using the sneaker as a GENERAL MARKER

    the other sneaker was left in the K2 car, they still have it somewhere

    they leave her,,,,  and k2 take the KILLER home

    killer gets daddy sloot to help him..

    pappa sloot drives to take care of the body...with joran killer at home on computer


    it aint rocket science, the lies started too early and had to keep changing
    as the story made no sense at every turn



    beech story was a LOAD of horse manure



    I agree that it was something similar to this but think at some point Natalee was at the Sloot residence.  But yeah, basically, that's what happened.

     :evil:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 15, 2007, 10:16:29 PM
    I remember reading about the ATM withdrawls as well back at RWV. The rumor was he used the ATM two times I beleave. I always wondered about Fransisco the witness who said he helped bury natalee and was locked up in a mental institute. Art said last week that his friends said he isnt crazy.Several stories came out about that night behind the Mariott involving two others. Either way hitting the ATM after 2.30 AM is suspicious. I certainly dont beleave for a minute that Joran won that much cash from a free tournament of texas hold em.

    I never have seen one lick of proof of ATM transactions but we havent seen anything of substance from the investigation except for some bogus internet chat. Even the damn computer was tampered with.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 10:16:38 PM
    I believe IF Natalee was ever at the beach, she was no longer alive.  They may have gone near the FH and disposed of her body temporarily in that area.  I think PVDS arranged to have it taken care of.  No body no case.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:19:28 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "robots"
    they get her into the car with a LIE about "oh we also are staying in the hotel, we are just visiting aruba also"   :roll:

    go to somewhere, maybe the lighthouse area, or somewhere like that

    they rape her, take pictures,  joran had his clothes off including the sneakers,

    she passed out from the drugs

    they panic... because they gave her the drugs

    they bury her, using the sneaker as a GENERAL MARKER

    the other sneaker was left in the K2 car, they still have it somewhere

    they leave her,,,,  and k2 take the KILLER home

    killer gets daddy sloot to help him..

    pappa sloot drives to take care of the body...with joran killer at home on computer


    it aint rocket science, the lies started too early and had to keep changing
    as the story made no sense at every turn



    beech story was a LOAD of horse manure



    I agree that it was something similar to this but think at some point Natalee was at the Sloot residence.  But yeah, basically, that's what happened.

     :evil:


    yepper
    brought to the sloot hell hole thats why JERK MAN went and googled drugs and alcohol or somethign like that


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 10:20:53 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I believe IF Natalee was ever at the beach, she was no longer alive.  They may have gone near the FH and disposed of her body temporarily in that area.  I think PVDS arranged to have it taken care of.  No body no case.

    I agree Klaas.

    At this point in time all the lies that we have heard are for Paulus and Joran because I believe someone saw Paulus that night.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:22:09 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Angie
    What if this guy starts doing this stuff with young boys?   Him being an adult, I would email him and tell him that you saved the video and he's now on notice that if you ever have any more problems with him...it's gonna be the police at his  door next time.


    What is it with you?  Do you just attract weirdos? (Angie knows what I mean by this and it won't make her mad, trust me.  :wink: )

     No I am not mad at all  ROFL    :wink:
     BT and Lalas .. I will handle it. trust me.  
     If MY son did this crap to a freind of mines mom...  Id want to know.
       I wanna drop it.. I love you guys,, but.. it makes me sick to think about.  :(     If The kids face wasnt in the video.. I wouldnt think it was him.. but it was.. and.. web cam? Never had one., dont want one.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 10:23:11 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "sb"
    Angie, count me with those who think you need to tell someone about what he did. That was disturbing.

    Is there any chance at all it was meant for your daughters instead of you (not that that makes it any better)?

     
    It may have been meant for my daughter or step daughter? I dunno?
      He dont have either one of their IM's since they bno longer reside here.
     They have mine. his mom and dad both ..and my hubbys.
    Yes it was diturbing. I am sick anyhow.. and to have my firends son flash  his peep.. it was a web cam.. all real time. the dancing was funny.. but then the peep shot.. I saw that and clciked off.. and scolded him.
     I probaly shouldnt have posted  about it to begin with.


    Well, at least your IM Video works with Vista.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:23:43 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "sb"
    Angie, count me with those who think you need to tell someone about what he did. That was disturbing.

    Is there any chance at all it was meant for your daughters instead of you (not that that makes it any better)?

     
    It may have been meant for my daughter or step daughter? I dunno?
      He dont have either one of their IM's since they bno longer reside here.
     They have mine. his mom and dad both ..and my hubbys.
    Yes it was diturbing. I am sick anyhow.. and to have my firends son flash  his peep.. it was a web cam.. all real time. the dancing was funny.. but then the peep shot.. I saw that and clciked off.. and scolded him.
     I probaly shouldnt have posted  about it to begin with.


    Well, at least your IM Video works with Vista.





    hehehehehehehehehhehe 8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 10:25:40 PM
    Carnut, lol  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:26:50 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    I remember reading about the ATM withdrawls as well back at RWV. The rumor was he used the ATM two times I beleave. I always wondered about Fransisco the witness who said he helped bury natalee and was locked up in a mental institute. Art said last week that his friends said he isnt crazy.Several stories came out about that night behind the Mariott involving two others. Either way hitting the ATM after 2.30 AM is suspicious. I certainly dont beleave for a minute that Joran won that much cash from a free tournament of texas hold em.

    I never have seen one lick of proof of ATM transactions but we havent seen anything of substance from the investigation except for some bogus internet chat. Even the damn computer was tampered with.


    Welcome!  Glad you are here.

    Concerning the ATM.  The only mention we have of two trips any place near an ATM was Paulus' two trips to the bank to deposit money.  There is always some smidgen of truth to the lies.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:30:41 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "robots"
    they get her into the car with a LIE about "oh we also are staying in the hotel, we are just visiting aruba also"   :roll:

    go to somewhere, maybe the lighthouse area, or somewhere like that

    they rape her, take pictures,  joran had his clothes off including the sneakers,

    she passed out from the drugs

    they panic... because they gave her the drugs

    they bury her, using the sneaker as a GENERAL MARKER

    the other sneaker was left in the K2 car, they still have it somewhere

    they leave her,,,,  and k2 take the KILLER home

    killer gets daddy sloot to help him..

    pappa sloot drives to take care of the body...with joran killer at home on computer


    it aint rocket science, the lies started too early and had to keep changing
    as the story made no sense at every turn



    beech story was a LOAD of horse manure



    I agree that it was something similar to this but think at some point Natalee was at the Sloot residence.  But yeah, basically, that's what happened.

     :evil:


     I agree too.. IMO she was at the Sloot dump  :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:33:29 PM
    Angie
    Are you feeling any better?  Did you get any sleep?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:33:43 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "robots"
    they get her into the car with a LIE about "oh we also are staying in the hotel, we are just visiting aruba also"   :roll:

    go to somewhere, maybe the lighthouse area, or somewhere like that

    they rape her, take pictures,  joran had his clothes off including the sneakers,

    she passed out from the drugs

    they panic... because they gave her the drugs

    they bury her, using the sneaker as a GENERAL MARKER

    the other sneaker was left in the K2 car, they still have it somewhere

    they leave her,,,,  and k2 take the KILLER home

    killer gets daddy sloot to help him..

    pappa sloot drives to take care of the body...with joran killer at home on computer


    it aint rocket science, the lies started too early and had to keep changing
    as the story made no sense at every turn



    beech story was a LOAD of horse manure



    I agree that it was something similar to this but think at some point Natalee was at the Sloot residence.  But yeah, basically, that's what happened.

     :evil:


     I agree too.. IMO she was at the Sloot dump  :(


    hell hole  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:34:22 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "sb"
    Angie, count me with those who think you need to tell someone about what he did. That was disturbing.

    Is there any chance at all it was meant for your daughters instead of you (not that that makes it any better)?

     
    It may have been meant for my daughter or step daughter? I dunno?
      He dont have either one of their IM's since they bno longer reside here.
     They have mine. his mom and dad both ..and my hubbys.
    Yes it was diturbing. I am sick anyhow.. and to have my firends son flash  his peep.. it was a web cam.. all real time. the dancing was funny.. but then the peep shot.. I saw that and clciked off.. and scolded him.
     I probaly shouldnt have posted  about it to begin with.


    Well, at least your IM Video works with Vista.

     

    Oh yeah..  real fuc*ing funny ha ha ha.
     It was over AOL .. AIM .. Vista dont have crap to do with that at all.  :evil:   I shoulfdhave just STFU about it all.  Its sick.. period.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:36:19 PM
    <------------not laughing any more


    we love Angie  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 10:37:34 PM
    I'm sorry to see you so upset Angie.  We love you.  Hugs to you!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:37:58 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Angie
    Are you feeling any better?  Did you get any sleep?

     A little bit Lalas to both.  I was a slug in bed all morning and part of the afternoon .  lol
     Hope all is wel with you.. and you beat that icky weather there.


    Title: Keep up the Good Work
    Post by: IBE on April 15, 2007, 10:38:21 PM
    Hi Monkeys,

    Keep up the Good Works

    Think I have the flu but not sure as body always hurts like the flu with Fibromyalgia so it's hard to know... remember when the words "head colds" were used?

    Am 40 pages behind in my reading here and haven't checked my email... so know I'm not up to par.. just checking in to say hi and I miss you.

    Love, IBE


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:38:50 PM
    look, i will do some stupid robot tricks

    or tell some stupid robot jokes


     8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 10:39:34 PM
    Sorry to keep bringing up questions on items you've probably already covered, but her I come with two more.
    How long would it take to drive from the Sloot place to this ATM?
    What size shoes does Paulus wear?

    Thanks,
    Ado :?  :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:39:44 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    look, i will do some stupid robot tricks

    or tell some stupid robot jokes


     8)


    or then again maybe i wont, and then everyone will be happy  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:40:42 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Angie
    Are you feeling any better?  Did you get any sleep?

     A little bit Lalas to both.  I was a slug in bed all morning and part of the afternoon .  lol
     Hope all is wel with you.. and you beat that icky weather there.


    I thought about you today and wondered if you were any better.  It takes time to kick that stuff.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 10:40:52 PM
    Robots you are usually a pretty good egg.  Did you put your foot in your mouth this time or what?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:41:11 PM
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 10:42:31 PM
    Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
    Yep - that one works.  If computers are as clever as they try to tell us they are, how come they don't know what we mean to type?

    Welcome to *******.  Nice to have you in the cage with us.  It gets wild on the FP sometimes and is usually calmer in here.

    Thank you again monkeys for all your messages.  They have really helped. Will be leaving in a short while and I do drive carefully (well past the age of hooning around)  :wink:

    I will leave a supply of small litter bags by the cage door. (No, they are NOT  barf bags) and if you just pop the banana peels in there that will make it so much easier for Lala's.
    Will miss you guys.   Back Wednesday.

    Mishy - Carpe posted it just to show how things can appear to be different than they really are.


    Just wanted to say hello to you, Tibro, and no "hooning" around.  Take care of yourself.  I have enjoyed reading about Australia.  Do you need any taxpaying citizens?  Some of us might be planning a leap across the pond in the next 2-3.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 10:44:07 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:


    Angie-you have a heart of gold.  You've always been a good, caring monkey.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:44:14 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Sorry to keep bringing up questions on items you've probably already covered, but her I come with two more.
    How long would it take to drive from the Sloot place to this ATM?
    What size shoes does Paulus wear?

    Thanks,
    Ado :?  :?


     Ado
     We have went over the shoes in the past?  IIRC it was a 10 1/2?
     Someone correct me if I wrong?  The shoe thingy was alot of topic on here!!  :)


    Title: Re: Keep up the Good Work
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 10:44:17 PM
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Hi Monkeys,

    Keep up the Good Works

    Think I have the flu but not sure as body always hurts like the flu with Fibromyalgia so it's hard to know... remember when the words "head colds" were used?

    Am 40 pages behind in my reading here and haven't checked my email... so know I'm not up to par.. just checking in to say hi and I miss you.

    Love, IBE


    IBE - I'm sorry you're feeling so badly, and I hope you feel better soon. Please take care.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 10:44:24 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Sorry to keep bringing up questions on items you've probably already covered, but her I come with two more.
    How long would it take to drive from the Sloot place to this ATM?
    What size shoes does Paulus wear?

    Thanks,
    Ado :?  :?


    PVDS shoe size = we don't know but my guess is 10.5

    McDonalds and ATM - my guess is around 5-10 minutes depending on traffic.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/arubamaphomes2.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:44:51 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Robots you are usually a pretty good egg.  Did you put your foot in your mouth this time or what?


    hi muffy
    naw,, i was just laughing at something carnut said,,, he was teasing angie

    but she got mad, so im playing peacemaker
     8)


    Title: Re: Keep up the Good Work
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 10:45:42 PM
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Hi Monkeys,

    Keep up the Good Works

    Think I have the flu but not sure as body always hurts like the flu with Fibromyalgia so it's hard to know... remember when the words "head colds" were used?

    Am 40 pages behind in my reading here and haven't checked my email... so know I'm not up to par.. just checking in to say hi and I miss you.

    Love, IBE


    HUGS to you IBE - sorry you aren't feeling well.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:46:19 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:





    youre tough  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 10:46:21 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Robots you are usually a pretty good egg.  Did you put your foot in your mouth this time or what?


    hi muffy
    naw,, i was just laughing at something carnut said,,, he was teasing angie

    but she got mad, so im playing peacemaker
     8)


    Okay.  I like it when we all play nice :D  :D  :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:46:50 PM
    Speaking of Vista and IM...is there a fix for Yahoo IM that doesn't work with Vista?  Kid is having fits with hers. You were right Angie.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 10:47:34 PM
    San, I hope it is not much work, although I am sure your insurance company would cover most of it if it was, it still is a lot to go through.  One thing calls for another.  Remember that leak I had from my roof last year, and they fixed it and they painted the great room, and then I realized that it made the rest of the house look crappy, so I just went about redoing the rest of it on my own dime.  DH was not happy but at least the roof is not leaking --- for now, anyway. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 10:47:36 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Robots you are usually a pretty good egg.  Did you put your foot in your mouth this time or what?


    hi muffy
    naw,, i was just laughing at something carnut said,,, he was teasing angie

    but she got mad, so im playing peacemaker
     8)


    Okay.  I like it when we all play nice :D  :D  :D


    im a  good robot

    most of the time


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 10:48:54 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Speaking of Vista and IM...is there a fix for Yahoo IM that doesn't work with Vista?  Kid is having fits with hers. You were right Angie.


    Hmmm.  When I bought my puter in November, I got a free upgrade for Vista, but have never installed it.  I've been waiting to see if any bugs shake out first.  Then, my son tells me there are puters such as mine that would just barely support vista.  So, I guess I will wait and see.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 10:49:45 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Speaking of Vista and IM...is there a fix for Yahoo IM that doesn't work with Vista?  Kid is having fits with hers. You were right Angie.


    http://messenger.yahoo.com/windowsvista.php

    Coming soon! Enter your email address below and we'll notify you as soon as Yahoo! Messenger for Windows Vista is ready. Note: Our current version 8.1 is compatible with Windows Vista.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 10:49:59 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    OT
     But then again.. when arn't I ? lol

    I belong to a support group online.  Its for the vocal cord problem BS.
     Anyhow every Sunday they meet online in a private chat for an hour. I really have nto been able to make it lately due to work. So there are a few new members. i went today since I was able to for a change.
      One of the members was talking about how she just went to Holland over Easter. Another member said OMG why would you go there after all thats been going on with the girl thats missing from Aruba.
     I almost fell off my chair here.  I spoke up and said I have followed the case as well.  Well this lady was sticking up for Aruba, and Holland and going on and on about corrupt govt's elsewhere. I asked her what exactly did she know about the case? I left a link for SM there and a link to the document threads.. said read it and weep and left.
      I had to leave , she was saying we don't like dutch?  I said thats not it at all. Could not make her get it. So I hope she reads the links I sent to her.
     It was just weird to be in that chat and have her go off about the case?
     :evil:


    Angie, good Lord, it just never ends.  I am so sorry about that problem with your vocal cords.  I read that you were having problems, but I thought it was just sinus related.  I hope you are not smoking.  If so, please try to quit.  I know how hard it is, but this will help.  Now, I did not mean to lecture you.  I just want you to take care of yourself.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 10:54:07 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Speaking of Vista and IM...is there a fix for Yahoo IM that doesn't work with Vista?  Kid is having fits with hers. You were right Angie.


    Hmmm.  When I bought my puter in November, I got a free upgrade for Vista, but have never installed it.  I've been waiting to see if any bugs shake out first.  Then, my son tells me there are puters such as mine that would just barely support vista.  So, I guess I will wait and see.


    You should never upgrade an existing system to Vista.

    The only way to get Vista is when it comes with a new computer and you have not other choice.

    Course, Ubuntu Linux solves the whole problem.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 10:54:42 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.


    Paulus has a swope.  I wonder if it flies when he drives with the windows down and if so, does Anita find it sensual.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:54:57 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Speaking of Vista and IM...is there a fix for Yahoo IM that doesn't work with Vista?  Kid is having fits with hers. You were right Angie.


    http://messenger.yahoo.com/windowsvista.php

    Coming soon! Enter your email address below and we'll notify you as soon as Yahoo! Messenger for Windows Vista is ready. Note: Our current version 8.1 is compatible with Windows Vista.


    Thanks. Just sent her the link.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 10:56:37 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.


    Paulus has a swope.  I wonder if it flies when he drives with the windows down and if so, does Anita find it sensual.


    I bet they warned Paulus this would happen and to just sit there and be quiet.  This meant nothing to him.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 10:56:38 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Speaking of Vista and IM...is there a fix for Yahoo IM that doesn't work with Vista?  Kid is having fits with hers. You were right Angie.


    http://messenger.yahoo.com/windowsvista.php

    Coming soon! Enter your email address below and we'll notify you as soon as Yahoo! Messenger for Windows Vista is ready. Note: Our current version 8.1 is compatible with Windows Vista.


    Thanks. Just sent her the link.

    What she should do is download version 8.1 then sign up on the email list for their new version that will be only for Vista.  But they are saying 8.1 does work with Vista now.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 10:57:17 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:


    Angie-you have a heart of gold.  You've always been a good, caring monkey.


     Thanks Muffy Sweety..
     last night I made a bad typo and said night Mussy Bee   :lol:   :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:01:32 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Photo of PVDS when he got his "spanking" in front of his peers  :wink: :


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/PVDS.jpg)

    Looks like his hair is combed forward to cover that balding spot on his left temple.


    Paulus has a swope.  I wonder if it flies when he drives with the windows down and if so, does Anita find it sensual.


    I bet they warned Paulus this would happen and to just sit there and be quiet.  This meant nothing to him.

    I agree again.  That's twice tonight :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 11:03:13 PM
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:03:36 PM
    Could it be, unlikely as it sounds that it is Paulus who wears the size 14 shoe and Joran the 10.5 as verified by the Dutch interrogators?

    Could J2k have been parked at the RacquetClub as witnessed by the gardener while trying to figure out a way to dispose of Natalee in the muck in the pond and that is where Joran lost his shoes?  Is that why the Kalpoe car had to be washed out immediately?

    Did they call and were they waiting for Paulus to pick up Joran and Natalee from there instead of at McDonalds?

    Anything is possible.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:03:42 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:03:44 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

    WAIT - did you ever hear more about the 911 operator's husband?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:04:34 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:





    youre tough  8)

      LOl Robots..
     YES I am..  I can be nice and can be a total bitch if need be.  :twisted:
    I prefer to be NICE.. I  do NOT like to argue with anyone.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:05:07 PM
    Quote from: "sb"
    There is also a rumor that some of the MB guys remember seeing PVDS in the vicinity of MickeyD's at aound 4 AM. That, coupled with the Aruban Supreme Court statement and the possible ATM stop, is beginning to take on some weight of attestation. Coming from 3 sources like that, there might be a ring of truth there.

    But it is all still just RUMOR, not proven by any means.

    I really don't think it was necessary for PVDS to go anywhere near the beach area that night. I think it all went down near the VDS home.


    Yes, I believe that rumor popped up about Mickey D and the MB guys about the time of the walnut salad that Paulus had bought for Natalee that was on the Snoots kitchen table, right?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:05:46 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Could it be, unlikely as it sounds that it is Paulus who wears the size 14 shoe and Joran the 10.5 as verified by the Dutch interrogators?

    Could J2k have been parked at the RacquetClub as witnessed by the gardener while trying to figure out a way to dispose of Natalee in the muck in the pond and that is where Joran lost his shoes?  Is that why the Kalpoe car had to be washed out immediately?

    Did they call and were they waiting for Paulus to pick up Joran and Natalee from there instead of at McDonalds?

    Anything is possible.

    .

    It's possible, unlikely but possible.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:06:17 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado



    Ado,
    I will try to recall where that rumor came from but it predates RU and also the taking of statements from the MB kids, it was a very early one.  And supposedly not just one withdrawal but two and the ATM near McDonalds at that.

    But from the fauxphotoing , we can see that by July, 2005, they were in full decoy form already.  It may be total fabrication but it was out there before any MB kids said they saw him.

    Very odd how absolutely NONE of the video cameras seem to have been working that night and there is no video of anything, isn't it?  I'd fire my security firm for that.  Seriously, by the time Beth got around to asking for videos from all the various places, they had already recorded over or their cameras were mysteriously not working that particular night.

    I have always found that odd, how many cameras supposedly did not work.  But Paulus banking records should address this question so we have to assume that ALE knows whether this was true or a decoy.

    If I can recall where I first heard that, I will post it but know it was pre RU existence and before MB kids statements were taken.  In other words, true or not, it came from Aruba.

    .


    Ah, Anna had already answered, and yes that is my same recollection.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:06:43 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "sb"
    There is also a rumor that some of the MB guys remember seeing PVDS in the vicinity of MickeyD's at aound 4 AM. That, coupled with the Aruban Supreme Court statement and the possible ATM stop, is beginning to take on some weight of attestation. Coming from 3 sources like that, there might be a ring of truth there.

    But it is all still just RUMOR, not proven by any means.

    I really don't think it was necessary for PVDS to go anywhere near the beach area that night. I think it all went down near the VDS home.


    Yes, I believe that rumor popped up about Mickey D and the MB guys about the time of the walnut salad that Paulus had bought for Natalee that was on the Snoots kitchen table, right?



    Yep, Waldorf salad.  Had forgotten that as well.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 11:07:03 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

    WAIT - did you ever hear more about the 911 operator's husband?


    They interviewed the sheriff on TV. He said the husband threatened to commit suicide. The sheriff, the man's sister, and his doctor went to the house - that's what all the hoo ha was about. The husband left with his doctor and that's the last anyone has heard about him. Apparently he said he was depressed because he was fired from his job and also because he says he doesn't know where his wife is.  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:07:15 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    The powers that be were not chastising Paulus for the sake of decency...it was all done for show.  They know that he holds all the cards still where they are concerned.  He has worked in the secret corners of their judiciary for years.  He knows things about people in the Netherlands as well as Aruba.  No one has a kid that has done the things Joran has done and continues to do without having the "goods" on a lot of people.  An underage boy can not gamble in a casino with a line of credit without the people in power allowing it.  That includes the casino owners and the government.  It goes to the corruption.  

    Most people think I believe that the actual demise of Natalee was a complicated thing, but it wasn't.  I have stayed within the simple mindset about her death.  It was the circumstances and subsequent cover up that becomes the problem.  For the truth about what happened to Natalee to come out the world would need to see what other skeletons are buried in Aruba's closets.

    Excuse my manners, hello everyone!


    I totally agree with everything you have said.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:07:31 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?

    The only time I heard someone mention the ATM transaction on TV was when Geraldo Rivera was a guest on the show The View.  Geraldo would have to know something to mention it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:08:00 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

      Darn it. BT..  you leave yet? Any news  that you have heard?
     Easy/Jossy  ?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:08:53 PM
    Strange thing is, McDonalds was supposed to have closed early since it was Sunday night.  Also yet another case of the missing video.

    Not one camera working or the ALE did not ask for video tapes pronto as that might constitute real evidence and that is always harder for them to make disappear.

    Not much harder, however, just a little bit.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:09:11 PM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Quote from: "klaasend"

    Angie - did you say this kid is 23?  Unfortunately, he is an adult in the eyes of the law and so are you.  I actually doubt if you called the cops they would do anything.  Don't get me wrong, what he did was really sick, I just don't think there's alot you can do.  If he's still living with his parents, about the only thing you could do is let them know what he's doing from THEIR home.


    I am not sure that there aren't laws against using cellphones for transmission of obscene materials. Just like regular phones.


    I think that since the Patriot Act and 911, there are boundries and I think our law enforcement keeps an eye out for unsolicited porno.  Do you recall the teacher who was convicted because it was on her computer and it was one of those things that could have happened to any of us.  I have clicked many porn sites since Natalee disappeared, somehing I had never done before, and now I am constantly barraged the garbage as a result.  Yes, I think law enforcement takes a dim view of unsolicited porno, wherever the transmission originated, but to an unsolicited person.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:09:38 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:





    youre tough  8)

      LOl Robots..
     YES I am..  I can be nice and can be a total bitch if need be.  :twisted:
    I prefer to be NICE.. I  do NOT like to argue with anyone.




    i know wimmmmmmens pretty well  8)
    Meredith Brooks performs a song that can help men figure em out  8)  

    most wimmmmmens are cool even when they get a little cranky


    youre tough, tough is good
    be tough

    no sheep allowed  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 11:09:46 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

      Darn it. BT..  you leave yet? Any news  that you have heard?
     Easy/Jossy  ?


    No news at all Ang. Last night Easy said he had emailed Jossy and was waiting on a reply. I haven't heard from Easy today, so I don't think Jossy has had much to say about the investigators.  :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:10:15 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?

    The only time I heard someone mention the ATM transaction on TV was when Geraldo Rivera was a guest on the show The View.  Geraldo would have to know something to mention it.


      San,
      You are right.. cone to think of it. I watched  when Geraldo said  that about the ATM.. and ddin;t he say something then as well about videos?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 11:11:11 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058


    Night BT. Smoochies!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:12:20 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:





    youre tough  8)

      LOl Robots..
     YES I am..  I can be nice and can be a total bitch if need be.  :twisted:
    I prefer to be NICE.. I  do NOT like to argue with anyone.




    i know wimmmmmmens pretty well  8)
    Meredith Brooks performs a song that can help men figure em out  8)  

    most wimmmmmens are cool even when they get a little cranky


    youre tough, tough is good
    be tough

    no sheep allowed  :wink:


       :wink:  Robots..  :)
      yes we wimmmmmens get cranky at times   :)
     I am not skeery. honest.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 11:13:27 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Could it be, unlikely as it sounds that it is Paulus who wears the size 14 shoe and Joran the 10.5 as verified by the Dutch interrogators?

    Could J2k have been parked at the RacquetClub as witnessed by the gardener while trying to figure out a way to dispose of Natalee in the muck in the pond and that is where Joran lost his shoes?  Is that why the Kalpoe car had to be washed out immediately?

    Did they call and were they waiting for Paulus to pick up Joran and Natalee from there instead of at McDonalds?

    Anything is possible.

    .


    I have thought that could be the case.  They had a passed out Natalee and then realized they couldn't wake her up.  She may not have been dead, but was close.  Then when Paulus got there and found out what happened he sent the K2 to clean the car and took Joran and Natalee off.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:14:00 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

      Darn it. BT..  you leave yet? Any news  that you have heard?
     Easy/Jossy  ?


    No news at all Ang. Last night Easy said he had emailed Jossy and was waiting on a reply. I haven't heard from Easy today, so I don't think Jossy has had much to say about the investigators.  :(

     

    Thanks  BT..   been checking his site out.. thought maybe you had some scoop   :wink:   Hope we hear some news soon!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:15:44 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "*******"
    I remember reading about the ATM withdrawls as well back at RWV. The rumor was he used the ATM two times I beleave. I always wondered about Fransisco the witness who said he helped bury natalee and was locked up in a mental institute. Art said last week that his friends said he isnt crazy.Several stories came out about that night behind the Mariott involving two others. Either way hitting the ATM after 2.30 AM is suspicious. I certainly dont beleave for a minute that Joran won that much cash from a free tournament of texas hold em.

    I never have seen one lick of proof of ATM transactions but we havent seen anything of substance from the investigation except for some bogus internet chat. Even the damn computer was tampered with.


    Welcome!  Glad you are here.

    Concerning the ATM.  The only mention we have of two trips any place near an ATM was Paulus' two trips to the bank to deposit money.  There is always some smidgen of truth to the lies.


    I think this really happened and I think there were Arubans who saw either the deposit slips or video cam from that time and strangely enough that camera was not working by the time we heard of it.  I take "camera not working" chit with a grain of salt.  I think he made the deposits and I think he was caught by deposit slips and the lady who worked at the bank who died recently was the one who was aware of it and perhaps a witness, and Paulus went to the bank (maybe twice) the following day to see her, talk with her, make a deposit.  Why?  Why did he not wait in line for the next teller instead of insisting on seeing her and what did she die from?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 15, 2007, 11:15:52 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

      Darn it. BT..  you leave yet? Any news  that you have heard?
     Easy/Jossy  ?


    No news at all Ang. Last night Easy said he had emailed Jossy and was waiting on a reply. I haven't heard from Easy today, so I don't think Jossy has had much to say about the investigators.  :(

     

    Thanks  BT..   been checking his site out.. thought maybe you had some scoop   :wink:   Hope we hear some news soon!


    I hope we hear something soon too, Angie. Maybe if Jossy does know anything about the investigation he isn't able to talk about it yet.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:17:12 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Sorry to keep bringing up questions on items you've probably already covered, but her I come with two more.
    How long would it take to drive from the Sloot place to this ATM?
    What size shoes does Paulus wear?

    Thanks,
    Ado :?  :?


    My understanding is that it is within a mile of the Sloot house and as far as the shoe size, we have been trying to figure that out for a long time, maybe a 10-1/2 or a 14.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:17:30 PM
    In this photo from Joran's release, look at the size of Anita's foot next to Joran's.  Either Anita has an exceptionally large foot or Joran's isn't a size 14.  Anna - you could be right on!!!

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/feetcompare.jpg)

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Feetcompare2.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:17:37 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am fine.. upset yes. It s ok. I am a big girl and can handle it. :)
     Otherwise my butt would have signed off by now  :wink:





    youre tough  8)

      LOl Robots..
     YES I am..  I can be nice and can be a total bitch if need be.  :twisted:
    I prefer to be NICE.. I  do NOT like to argue with anyone.




    i know wimmmmmmens pretty well  8)
    Meredith Brooks performs a song that can help men figure em out  8)  

    most wimmmmmens are cool even when they get a little cranky


    youre tough, tough is good
    be tough

    no sheep allowed  :wink:


       :wink:  Robots..  :)
      yes we wimmmmmens get cranky at times   :)
     I am not skeery. honest.



    yes, at times  :wink:
    i dont find you skerrrrrrrrrry at all,  :wink:


    men and women are just differnet, not any better not any worse
    just different
    i like it that way, although some organizations try to make us all the same

    i wont go off on a rant here... but maybe in another thread sometime
    but the cold hard facts are we all need each other and thats the bottom line  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:18:49 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Could it be, unlikely as it sounds that it is Paulus who wears the size 14 shoe and Joran the 10.5 as verified by the Dutch interrogators?

    Could J2k have been parked at the RacquetClub as witnessed by the gardener while trying to figure out a way to dispose of Natalee in the muck in the pond and that is where Joran lost his shoes?  Is that why the Kalpoe car had to be washed out immediately?

    Did they call and were they waiting for Paulus to pick up Joran and Natalee from there instead of at McDonalds?

    Anything is possible.

    .


    I have thought that could be the case.  They had a passed out Natalee and then realized they couldn't wake her up.  She may not have been dead, but was close.  Then when Paulus got there and found out what happened he sent the K2 to clean the car and took Joran and Natalee off.


    :smt045  Took her to the Sloot residence.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:19:09 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?

    The only time I heard someone mention the ATM transaction on TV was when Geraldo Rivera was a guest on the show The View.  Geraldo would have to know something to mention it.


      San,
      You are right.. cone to think of it. I watched  when Geraldo said  that about the ATM.. and ddin;t he say something then as well about videos?

    I don't remember anything about the videos.  I only remember that the board lit up when he mentioned that.  He said he hoped that Paulus would sue him so he could question him in court about the ATM transactions he made that night.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:19:12 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Night monkeys. (http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

    Sweet dreams everyone.  :smt058

      Darn it. BT..  you leave yet? Any news  that you have heard?
     Easy/Jossy  ?


    No news at all Ang. Last night Easy said he had emailed Jossy and was waiting on a reply. I haven't heard from Easy today, so I don't think Jossy has had much to say about the investigators.  :(

     

    Thanks  BT..   been checking his site out.. thought maybe you had some scoop   :wink:   Hope we hear some news soon!


    I hope we hear something soon too, Angie. Maybe if Jossy does know anything about the investigation he isn't able to talk about it yet.


    True BT,,  Thanks.. keep us posted :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:19:39 PM
    i thought we thought ANITA had sasquatch feet



     :smt005


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:20:37 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Could it be, unlikely as it sounds that it is Paulus who wears the size 14 shoe and Joran the 10.5 as verified by the Dutch interrogators?

    Could J2k have been parked at the RacquetClub as witnessed by the gardener while trying to figure out a way to dispose of Natalee in the muck in the pond and that is where Joran lost his shoes?  Is that why the Kalpoe car had to be washed out immediately?

    Did they call and were they waiting for Paulus to pick up Joran and Natalee from there instead of at McDonalds?

    Anything is possible.

    .


    I have thought that could be the case.  They had a passed out Natalee and then realized they couldn't wake her up.  She may not have been dead, but was close.  Then when Paulus got there and found out what happened he sent the K2 to clean the car and took Joran and Natalee off.


    :smt045  Took her to the Sloot residence.

    .



    yep


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 11:21:49 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    In this photo from Joran's release, look at the size of Anita's foot next to Joran's.  Either Anita has an exceptionally large foot or Joran's isn't a size 14.  Anna - you could be right on!!!

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/feetcompare.jpg)

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Feetcompare2.jpg)


    Think the dutch interrogator already pointed out JVDS was wearing a 10.5. during his interview.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 15, 2007, 11:22:58 PM
    Nite All. Going to hit the sack.

    Thanks for the responses to my ATM related questions.
    I have some ideas on what I think may have gone on that night, but still am looking for more information and don't want to throw my scenario out here yet until I have my puzzle pieces gathered.

    I'll just thow this out for now and check for opinions in the morning. Who would Joran be covering for by claiming he wore size 14 shoes? Who wears a size 14?

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:23:30 PM
    [quote="robots i dont find you skerrrrrrrrrry at all,  :wink:


    men and women are just differnet, not any better not any worse
    just different
    i like it that way, although some organizations try to make us all the same

    i wont go off on a rant here... but maybe in another thread sometime
    but the cold hard facts are we all need each other and thats the bottom line  8)[/quote]

     I agree 100% Robots!  :)   No time to argue with folks. !!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:24:26 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Nite All. Going to hit the sack.

    Thanks for the responses to my ATM related questions.
    I have some ideas on what I think may have gone on that night, but still am looking for more information and don't want to throw my scenario out here yet until I have my puzzle pieces gathered.

    I'll just thow this out for now and check for opinions in the morning. Who would Joran be covering for by claiming he wore size 14 shoes? Who wears a size 14?

    Ado


    We are wondering if PVDS wears a 14.

    Nite!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:24:40 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "*******"
    I remember reading about the ATM withdrawls as well back at RWV. The rumor was he used the ATM two times I beleave. I always wondered about Fransisco the witness who said he helped bury natalee and was locked up in a mental institute. Art said last week that his friends said he isnt crazy.Several stories came out about that night behind the Mariott involving two others. Either way hitting the ATM after 2.30 AM is suspicious. I certainly dont beleave for a minute that Joran won that much cash from a free tournament of texas hold em.

    I never have seen one lick of proof of ATM transactions but we havent seen anything of substance from the investigation except for some bogus internet chat. Even the damn computer was tampered with.


    Welcome!  Glad you are here.

    Concerning the ATM.  The only mention we have of two trips any place near an ATM was Paulus' two trips to the bank to deposit money.  There is always some smidgen of truth to the lies.


    I think this really happened and I think there were Arubans who saw either the deposit slips or video cam from that time and strangely enough that camera was not working by the time we heard of it.  I take "camera not working" chit with a grain of salt.  I think he made the deposits and I think he was caught by deposit slips and the lady who worked at the bank who died recently was the one who was aware of it and perhaps a witness, and Paulus went to the bank (maybe twice) the following day to see her, talk with her, make a deposit.  Why?  Why did he not wait in line for the next teller instead of insisting on seeing her and what did she die from?

    Tyler I agree.  I believe the bank transactions are one of many things that the ALE has on Paulus.  The transaction and the video are big.

    The lady at the bank died from Paulitious.  It's called fear of drowning from a sweaty man.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:24:42 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?

    The only time I heard someone mention the ATM transaction on TV was when Geraldo Rivera was a guest on the show The View.  Geraldo would have to know something to mention it.


    Geraldo and his brother seemed to be digging up some pretty good stuff in Aurba and were called off the case.  Greta who seems to be Roger Ailes' favorite adversial commentator got it all hook, line and sinker and soon Geraldo was sent off to Fox-local and now Geraldo is back but does not seem to have exclusives on anything --- the prodigal attorney, Greta, seems to get it all.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:24:57 PM
    I have three 6 ft plus sons and those are not Size 14 shoes just as his foot was close to the size of Greta's who is absolutely tiny, maybe not five feet tall.   I would guess her shoe size to be maybe a five tops.  That would mean his foot would have to be almost three times the size of hers and yet they appear the same size.

    Some of it is camera angle distortion but that is not enough to account for it all.  

    But then I see little heads on tables, too.  

     :smt036  :smt036  :smt036


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:26:48 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Could it be, unlikely as it sounds that it is Paulus who wears the size 14 shoe and Joran the 10.5 as verified by the Dutch interrogators?

    Could J2k have been parked at the RacquetClub as witnessed by the gardener while trying to figure out a way to dispose of Natalee in the muck in the pond and that is where Joran lost his shoes?  Is that why the Kalpoe car had to be washed out immediately?

    Did they call and were they waiting for Paulus to pick up Joran and Natalee from there instead of at McDonalds?

    Anything is possible.

    .


    I have thought that could be the case.  They had a passed out Natalee and then realized they couldn't wake her up.  She may not have been dead, but was close.  Then when Paulus got there and found out what happened he sent the K2 to clean the car and took Joran and Natalee off.


    :smt045  Took her to the Sloot residence.

    .



    yep


    Thought if he could get her to eat something, she might be OK.  Tried to feed her that Waldorf salad, big mistake.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:26:53 PM
    10.5 next to a size 5

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/compareshoe.jpg)

    Anita must have pretty large feet.  Judging by this picture looks like Joran may not have a size 14.  

    Carnut - yes we know the Dutch interrigators pointed out the 10.5 but Joran still insisted he wore a 14.


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Feetcompare2.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:27:56 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Nite All. Going to hit the sack.

    Thanks for the responses to my ATM related questions.
    I have some ideas on what I think may have gone on that night, but still am looking for more information and don't want to throw my scenario out here yet until I have my puzzle pieces gathered.

    I'll just thow this out for now and check for opinions in the morning. Who would Joran be covering for by claiming he wore size 14 shoes? Who wears a size 14?

    Ado


    We are wondering if PVDS wears a 14.

    Nite!

    Klaas in that photo you posted Anita is in front of Joran so you really can't tell if he has big feet or not.  At least I can't tell.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 15, 2007, 11:29:27 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "sb"
    Quote from: "klaasend"

    Angie - did you say this kid is 23?  Unfortunately, he is an adult in the eyes of the law and so are you.  I actually doubt if you called the cops they would do anything.  Don't get me wrong, what he did was really sick, I just don't think there's alot you can do.  If he's still living with his parents, about the only thing you could do is let them know what he's doing from THEIR home.


    I am not sure that there aren't laws against using cellphones for transmission of obscene materials. Just like regular phones.


    I think that since the Patriot Act and 911, there are boundries and I think our law enforcement keeps an eye out for unsolicited porno.  Do you recall the teacher who was convicted because it was on her computer and it was one of those things that could have happened to any of us.  I have clicked many porn sites since Natalee disappeared, somehing I had never done before, and now I am constantly barraged the garbage as a result.  Yes, I think law enforcement takes a dim view of unsolicited porno, wherever the transmission originated, but to an unsolicited person.


    Angie,  I am seeing this a different way.  I think this 'kid' has a problem and he is a flasher or worse.   I would contact the police if you still have the video.  Show it to them, and let them handle it.  He could be sending it to 13 year girls too.  His parents should be alerted, but I would let the police do this.  He is a pervert in my eyes.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 15, 2007, 11:30:00 PM
    I am afraid that it is Anita who has big, huge, ugly boats. It is not really possible to make the comparison and gauge what Joran wears from that. I don't think 14's for him are out of the question.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:30:06 PM
    so, where did the size 14 .5 come from ???


    hmmmmmmmmmmmm  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:30:48 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?

    The only time I heard someone mention the ATM transaction on TV was when Geraldo Rivera was a guest on the show The View.  Geraldo would have to know something to mention it.


    Geraldo and his brother seemed to be digging up some pretty good stuff in Aurba and were called off the case.  Greta who seems to be Roger Ailes' favorite adversial commentator got it all hook, line and sinker and soon Geraldo was sent off to Fox-local and now Geraldo is back but does not seem to have exclusives on anything --- the prodigal attorney, Greta, seems to get it all.

    From what I remember Geraldo and his brother had some good sources in Aruba.  I remember hearing him say from a reliable source and it wasn't Jossy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:30:57 PM
    I am 5 9 1/2 and wear a size 10 to 11 in a chicky shoe.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:31:28 PM
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:32:03 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    10.5 next to a size 5

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/compareshoe.jpg)

    Anita must have pretty large feet.  Judging by this picture looks like Joran may not have a size 14.  

    Carnut - yes we know the Dutch interrigators pointed out the 10.5 but Joran still insisted he wore a 14.


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Feetcompare2.jpg)


    I would guess anita is about a size 9 shoe.  She has the body surface area for that, but then that is not always the way it works.  However, most women of that stature have big feet.  If she has big feet and Paulus has big feet, then it would stand to reason, the Sporter might have big feet.  His feet do look cramped in those shoes.

    Anyone can wear a smaller size if they want to.  I wear a 6-1/2 and my friend told me when I was in a beauty pageant that my feet were too big in my swim suit for the size of my body, so she forced me to wear her 4's.  My feet were almost paralyzed by crowning time.  :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:32:51 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    so, where did the size 14 .5 come from ???


    hmmmmmmmmmmmm  8)


    It was a size 14, and Dompig announced when they were draining the pond area that they were looking for a pair of size 14 k-swiss.  That Joran had left them behind or lost them.  It was like a big announcement in Aruba they even put up posters so people would be on the lookout.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:33:27 PM
    AZ  TY for your advice.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:34:18 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"


    I would guess anita is about a size 9 shoe.  She has the body surface area for that, but then that is not always the way it works.  However, most women of that stature have big feet.  If she has big feet and Paulus has big feet, then it would stand to reason, the Sporter might have big feet.  His feet do look cramped in those shoes.

    Anyone can wear a smaller size if they want to.  I wear a 6-1/2 and my friend told me when I was in a beauty pageant that my feet were too big in my swim suit for the size of my body, so she forced me to wear her 4's.  My feet were almost paralyzed by crowning time.  :lol:  :lol:

    OMG Tyler this is so funny.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:34:27 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    10.5 next to a size 5

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/compareshoe.jpg)

    Anita must have pretty large feet.  Judging by this picture looks like Joran may not have a size 14.  

    Carnut - yes we know the Dutch interrigators pointed out the 10.5 but Joran still insisted he wore a 14.


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Feetcompare2.jpg)



    OK, now imagine how much larger a Size 14 would have to be.  Would take a fun house mirror to distort that much.

    Joran has small feet for his height.  Note the proportion of foot to ankle/knee for a gauge.  

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:35:28 PM
    GAH!  Now I'm gonna have nightmare's after looking at I-Need-A Van der Snoot so close to bedtime.   :shock:  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:36:16 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    so, where did the size 14 .5 come from ???


    hmmmmmmmmmmmm  8)


    It was a size 14, and Dompig announced when they were draining the pond area that they were looking for a pair of size 14 k-swiss.  That Joran had left them behind or lost them.  It was like a big announcement in Aruba they even put up posters so people would be on the lookout.


    exactly ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    i knew you knew it, i was just wondering who might have fallen asleep on the job  :lol:

     8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 11:36:32 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    I am 5 9 1/2 and wear a size 10 to 11 in a chicky shoe.


    I always thought that the size of your shoe would correspond to the size of your structure... tall people, long shoes, etc.

    My son is 6'6" and wears size 15

    However, my ex-boyfriend is 6'4" or better, is a much bigger man
    structurally and wears size 10.

    I've come to the conclusion that foot size has nothing to do with body size.

    Besides, 10 1/2 is plenty big.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:36:59 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    lol  My hubby is the same height and wears the same size shoe too.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 15, 2007, 11:38:29 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    My hubbie is 6'2 and wears an 11 1/2 or 12.  His step son is 6 5 and wears a 12 1/2 or 13.  No way there is a 14 in this group unless it is paulas.  how tall is Paulas? Maybe it is Anita that wears a 14!  Oh my gosh...whole new picture!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 11:38:30 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    so, where did the size 14 .5 come from ???


    hmmmmmmmmmmmm  8)


    It was a size 14, and Dompig announced when they were draining the pond area that they were looking for a pair of size 14 k-swiss.  That Joran had left them behind or lost them.  It was like a big announcement in Aruba they even put up posters so people would be on the lookout.


    exactly ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    i knew you knew it, i was just wondering who might have fallen asleep on the job  :lol:

     8)


    And that's because 'they' all knew that any missing shoes that might be found, were not gonna be size 14.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:39:32 PM
    Goodnight everyone.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:40:33 PM
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 11:40:43 PM
    Quote from: "AZSunny"
    Quote from: "robots"
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    My hubbie is 6'2 and wears an 11 1/2 or 12.  His step son is 6 5 and wears a 12 1/2 or 13.  No way there is a 14 in this group unless it is paulas.  how tall is Paulas? Maybe it is Anita that wears a 14!  Oh my gosh...whole new picture!!


     :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:40:53 PM
    Nite San


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 15, 2007, 11:40:56 PM
    Quote from: "AZSunny"
    Quote from: "robots"
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    My hubbie is 6'2 and wears an 11 1/2 or 12.  His step son is 6 5 and wears a 12 1/2 or 13.  No way there is a 14 in this group unless it is paulas.  how tall is Paulas? Maybe it is Anita that wears a 14!  Oh my gosh...whole new picture!!

     :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:41:37 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    so, where did the size 14 .5 come from ???


    hmmmmmmmmmmmm  8)


    It was a size 14, and Dompig announced when they were draining the pond area that they were looking for a pair of size 14 k-swiss.  That Joran had left them behind or lost them.  It was like a big announcement in Aruba they even put up posters so people would be on the lookout.



    I remember it as Chief Roy Tromp who made the shoe announcement.  But Joran is not stupid--wait, yes he is!  But he still said a different size than he wore so if the shoe was found, they would discard it saying it was the wrong size and not likely test for DNA evidence.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:41:45 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Goodnight everyone.

     Night San  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 15, 2007, 11:42:17 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "AZSunny"
    Quote from: "robots"
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    My hubbie is 6'2 and wears an 11 1/2 or 12.  His step son is 6 5 and wears a 12 1/2 or 13.  No way there is a 14 in this group unless it is paulas.  how tall is Paulas? Maybe it is Anita that wears a 14!  Oh my gosh...whole new picture!!


     :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


    whoops meant my husband's son wears a 12 1/2 or so.  

    Yep it is Anita... flop flop flop flop :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:42:32 PM
    im not sure if i mentioned this, but once when i was a little robots

    i tried to convince my mother that i should be able to wear my
    SKI BOOTS to school,,just thinking about this makes me laugh 8)

    anyone that knows anything about ski boots knows that about 30 years ago they were very heavy and laced up,,no buckles and they were heavy
    i think i was 7 years old...after much trying to convince my mother about how i should be able to wear them she finally said
    "well, if you want to wear them to school, go ahead"

    so, i got on the bus with my ski boots and almost tripped going up the bus steps... these shoes are ridiculous, they are heavy and awkward and just plain uncmortable especially getting on buses and off buses
    not to mention walking in class with these things on

    ...needless to say it was a HUGE MISTAKE on my part to wear them

    at age 7 i was walking around school like a robot

    and im always reminded about the ski boot FIASCO

     :x


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:43:48 PM
    Robots-did you get blisters from wearing those ski boots to school?  You must have had some sore legs that night...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:43:52 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    im 5 9 and wear size 9.5  8)


    lol  My hubby is the same height and wears the same size shoe too.




     :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 11:43:53 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Yes a dutch interrogator did check JVDS shoes in an interview and said that 10.5 appeared to fit him ok.

    So, if as some think shoes are a concern in the case, then maybe they do contain something that can be traced to Nat and maybe they are in the possession of some interested parties, in the event that they are needed for some reason.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:44:03 PM
    My son is 6 ft 3.. wears a 13 shoe.. and weighs 165.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 11:44:04 PM
    I heard that Paulus was in jail and borrowed a pair of size 14 shoes
    because he thought that the investigator, fresh from Holland, would
    ask him his shoe size.  That's where the size 14 came in.

    Later, on another day, that same investigator was the one that
    determined that a size 10.5 fit him well as he asked him to take
    the shoe off and examined it and the fit.

    How tall is Joran?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:45:29 PM
    My tallest son wears the smallest shoe and a narrower one as well.  Height does not always translate into foot size.

    The Dutch interrogator verified Joran was wearing a 10.5 and not complaining.

    Yes, odds were that no one would find a Size 14 so no need to check for evidence.  Also I think Joran wanted to keep the shoes he was wearing or had Deepak retrieve or that Deepak had in his possession.

    Then again, maybe the whole shoe is yet another red herring?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:45:42 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Robots-did you get blisters from wearing those ski boots to school?  You must have had some sore legs that night...


    my feet were bleeding when i got home  :x


     :shock:

    my mother was wise... she probably had enough of me "CONVINCING her what a great idea it was

    some times parents need to let kids learn some things themselves


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:45:56 PM
    So, ya'll believe there is some incriminating evidence on the shoes, such as maybe Natalee's DNA?  Oh.  I remember when one of the pond's was supposed to be drained to look for a shoe :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 15, 2007, 11:46:38 PM
    I really hate to do this, but I am intrigued by the injection of Waldorf Salad into the picture, and tonight is the first I've heard about it.

    What's the story on it? Where did we hear about it?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 11:46:57 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I heard that Paulus was in jail and borrowed a pair of size 14 shoes
    because he thought that the investigator, fresh from Holland, would
    ask him his shoe size.  That's where the size 14 came in.

    Later, on another day, that same investigator was the one that
    determined that a size 10.5 fit him well as he asked him to take
    the shoe off and examined it and the fit.

    How tall is Joran?


    Or... maybe I have it backwards.  There was an article about it as Jossy
    thought that it was funny that Joran would say that he went to jail without
    any shoes.

    Don't remember where I read it....


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:47:09 PM
    so, when paulus put Natalee in the septic tank
    that is where he lost his shoes


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:47:11 PM
    But if memory serves me, the pond draining seemed to be a way of taking attention away from the dump search.  Anyone remember that?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:48:01 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    so, when paulus put Natalee in the septic tank
    that is where he lost his shoes


    Ah yes, the Granny Toad theory


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:48:02 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    im not sure if i mentioned this, but once when i was a little robots

    i tried to convince my mother that i should be able to wear my
    SKI BOOTS to school,,just thinking about this makes me laugh 8)

    anyone that knows anything about ski boots knows that about 30 years ago they were very heavy and laced up,,no buckles and they were heavy
    i think i was 7 years old...after much trying to convince my mother about how i should be able to wear them she finally said
    "well, if you want to wear them to school, go ahead"

    so, i got on the bus with my ski boots and almost tripped going up the bus steps... these shoes are ridiculous, they are heavy and awkward and just plain uncmortable especially getting on buses and off buses
    not to mention walking in class with these things on

    ...needless to say it was a HUGE MISTAKE on my part to wear them

    at age 7 i was walking around school like a robot

    and im always reminded about the ski boot FIASCO

     :x

      ROFLMAO  ROBOTS! TY for a much needed laugh!
      I used to snow ski.. and walking in ski boots was hard!. They dont bend!
     I can see now why you  walked like a robot  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:49:20 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    im not sure if i mentioned this, but once when i was a little robots

    i tried to convince my mother that i should be able to wear my
    SKI BOOTS to school,,just thinking about this makes me laugh 8)

    anyone that knows anything about ski boots knows that about 30 years ago they were very heavy and laced up,,no buckles and they were heavy
    i think i was 7 years old...after much trying to convince my mother about how i should be able to wear them she finally said
    "well, if you want to wear them to school, go ahead"

    so, i got on the bus with my ski boots and almost tripped going up the bus steps... these shoes are ridiculous, they are heavy and awkward and just plain uncmortable especially getting on buses and off buses
    not to mention walking in class with these things on

    ...needless to say it was a HUGE MISTAKE on my part to wear them

    at age 7 i was walking around school like a robot

    and im always reminded about the ski boot FIASCO

     :x

      ROFLMAO  ROBOTS! TY for a much needed laugh!
      I used to snow ski.. and walking in ski boots was hard!. They dont bend!
     I can see now why you  walked like a robot  :wink:



    yep, at age 7 i was a genuis in my own mind  8)  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:50:26 PM
    From Joran's June 14, 2005 statement:
    http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=184


    {snipped}

    told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me. I had left a pair of white and blue shoes of the make "K-Swiss", size "14" on the beach. These shoes I bought in the USA.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 15, 2007, 11:50:34 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I heard that Paulus was in jail and borrowed a pair of size 14 shoes
    because he thought that the investigator, fresh from Holland, would
    ask him his shoe size.  That's where the size 14 came in.

    Later, on another day, that same investigator was the one that
    determined that a size 10.5 fit him well as he asked him to take
    the shoe off and examined it and the fit.

    How tall is Joran?


    Paulus or Joran?  who borrowed the shoes?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 15, 2007, 11:50:38 PM
    I read two diffrent articles on the dutch measuring his feet and the other time they felt to make sure his feet fit the shoe. Both times stated his feet were 10.5

    Somebody is lying there ass off about the size of his feet. Thats a big discrepency from 10.5 to size 14.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:52:10 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Anna,

    You seem to remember most of the details. I was asking about he 4 AM ATM stop earlier today and the only thing I could find out was that it may have been a fabrication that came out of RU. Is that all it was? In other words, there is no proof of an ATM stop at 4 AM?

    Ado


    I am just reading this and perhaps Anna has already answered by now, but RU was not even up and running at that time and I have never been able to find anything that reconciled the 4 a.m. ATM except what some Arubans who were posting on some boards at the time told us.  Maybe Anna has better information and will post, but that is all I know and I think you and I have posted on the same boards in the past -- no?

    The only time I heard someone mention the ATM transaction on TV was when Geraldo Rivera was a guest on the show The View.  Geraldo would have to know something to mention it.


    Geraldo and his brother seemed to be digging up some pretty good stuff in Aurba and were called off the case.  Greta who seems to be Roger Ailes' favorite adversial commentator got it all hook, line and sinker and soon Geraldo was sent off to Fox-local and now Geraldo is back but does not seem to have exclusives on anything --- the prodigal attorney, Greta, seems to get it all.

    From what I remember Geraldo and his brother had some good sources in Aruba.  I remember hearing him say from a reliable source and it wasn't Jossy.


    And they sent the ditzy Greta to do the job of an investigational journalist.  Roger Ailes should be ... San, where's your gun?   :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 15, 2007, 11:52:25 PM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    I really hate to do this, but I am intrigued by the injection of Waldorf Salad into the picture, and tonight is the first I've heard about it.

    What's the story on it? Where did we hear about it?


    I am with you msmarple...I have never heard anything about this (that I remember) :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 15, 2007, 11:52:55 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    I read two diffrent articles on the dutch measuring his feet and the other time they felt to make sure his feet fit the shoe. Both times stated his feet were 10.5

    Somebody is lying there ass off about the size of his feet. Thats a big discrepency from 10.5 to size 14.

    I agree *******


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:53:12 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    From Joran's June 14, 2005 statement:
    http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=184


    {snipped}

    told Deepak that I left my shoes at the Marriot Hotel. Deepak told me not to worry that he would go back the next day and pick them up for me. I had left a pair of white and blue shoes of the make "K-Swiss", size "14" on the beach. These shoes I bought in the USA.


    he figured one of two things

    they would look for a size 14 and of course they wouldnt find a size 14
    with any of his DNA on them

    cause they dont EXIST

    if they find a size 10......they would not test

    sorry JORAN you pig

    i hate you


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 15, 2007, 11:53:51 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    I read two diffrent articles on the dutch measuring his feet and the other time they felt to make sure his feet fit the shoe. Both times stated his feet were 10.5

    Somebody is lying there ass off about the size of his feet. Thats a big discrepency from 10.5 to size 14.



    BINGO !


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:54:08 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    My DH got an e-mail from someone in Aruba very early on saying there was a shoe with Natalee's blood on it and that it took place at the HI.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 11:54:27 PM
    Quote from: "AZSunny"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    I really hate to do this, but I am intrigued by the injection of Waldorf Salad into the picture, and tonight is the first I've heard about it.

    What's the story on it? Where did we hear about it?


    I am with you msmarple...I have never heard anything about this (that I remember) :oops:


    The salad story is a new one on me as well.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 15, 2007, 11:54:32 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "robots"
    so, when paulus put Natalee in the septic tank
    that is where he lost his shoes


    Ah yes, the Granny Toad theory

     

     Yep Muffy.  !
       Sure hope these 10 investigators that went to Aruba are up to something good. IMO .. it does not take 10 people to close a case as some have speculted thats what may be happening. Something  else  IMO has to be going on, but thats just my feelings.
      Hope we hear some news  soon.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 11:54:32 PM
    I still think that there might be something to this witness that has been
    discredited and deported to Columbia.

    He said that he had taken a couple things, after witnessing a rape and
    murder.  He said that the man that had raped and killed this girl was
    in the process of disposing of her body, when he took a couple things.

    The more I think about it the more it seems logical that he might have
    taken a shoe or two.  Why?   Because the man would be at a disadvantage without shoes to protect his feet.

    There has to be  a reason for all the questions posed by the investigators
    about shoes, and shoe size.  Maybe they were trying to tie Joran in with
    the shoes.  Why else would it matter if he were barefoot or not.  This is
    Aruba... warm most the time.... I'm sure that people walk barefoot some-
    times and people think nothing of it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 15, 2007, 11:55:19 PM
    My DH wears size 10 1/2 shoes and he's short compared to Joran. Anita has a large foot.  I wear a size 8 and my foot looks small.  Her foot is more like a 9 or even a 10.  Why don't they just measure those feet?  It is not that hard to find out if he wears a 14.  Maybe the shoes belonged to some big fat guy...let's see who could that be?  Koen?  Steve Croes?  The one that helped may have lost the shoe and they said it was Joran's as a cover.  Well, maybe that's a bit over the top...I will slink off to the corner for a bit.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 15, 2007, 11:55:31 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    I read two different articles on the dutch measuring his feet and the other time they felt to make sure his feet fit the shoe. Both times stated his feet were 10.5

    Somebody is lying there ass off about the size of his feet. Thats a big discrepency from 10.5 to size 14.



    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV?  I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna.  We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?   :D

    You are exactly right, the Dutch interrogator measured the feet to the Size 10.5 fitting, etc. and firmly established that he did in fact wear a Size 10.5.  

    I am sure if his shoes were four sizes too small, Joran would not hesitate to complain long and loud.  Not one to exactly suffer in silence that I can see.

    I don't know why some continue to insist he wears a different size just because he says so.  I mean, it's not as though the boy never lies about anything and he just lied about the shoe size as well.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 15, 2007, 11:56:05 PM
    Could it be some kind of a fad with these peeps to wear shoes that are bigger than they need to be? Like maybe it will attract girls somehow that they are supposed to have big feet?

    There was a, ahem, "theory" about that posed a while back. Not wanting to open that exact line of thought up too much...  :roll: but could there have been a reason WHY Joran wanted to wear big floppy shoes?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 15, 2007, 11:56:39 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    My DH wears size 10 1/2 shoes and he's short compared to Joran. Anita has a large foot.  I wear a size 8 and my foot looks small.  Her foot is more like a 9 or even a 10.  Why don't they just measure those feet?  It is not that hard to find out if he wears a 14.  Maybe the shoes belonged to some big fat guy...let's see who could that be?  Koen?  Steve Croes?  The one that helped may have lost the shoe and they said it was Joran's as a cover.  Well, maybe that's a bit over the top...I will slink off to the corner for a bit.


    A dutch interrogator did check the size show JVDS was wearing in an interview, it was 10.5.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 15, 2007, 11:57:36 PM
    I think it was a cistern, which is like an underground water collection/storage, instead of a septic tank that some believe Natalee was put into on the Sloots property.  (You know the place.  The one that was supposedly searched, and then we found they only searched a small part of it.  Which is the same one that Paulus wouldn't let Equisearch check out.  Uh-huh...)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:58:40 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    My DH wears size 10 1/2 shoes and he's short compared to Joran. Anita has a large foot.  I wear a size 8 and my foot looks small.  Her foot is more like a 9 or even a 10.  Why don't they just measure those feet?  It is not that hard to find out if he wears a 14.  Maybe the shoes belonged to some big fat guy...let's see who could that be?  Koen?  Steve Croes?  The one that helped may have lost the shoe and they said it was Joran's as a cover.  Well, maybe that's a bit over the top...I will slink off to the corner for a bit.


    That's what I was thinking, Lala's.  I wonder who wore a size 14.  It might be they are sending signals to someone involved by mentioning the size "14."  I would like to know who that someone is.  The size 14 is not as much a red herring as it is a message to someone to shut up (the owner of the size 14).


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 15, 2007, 11:59:09 PM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I still think that there might be something to this witness that has been
    discredited and deported to Columbia.

    He said that he had taken a couple things, after witnessing a rape and
    murder.  He said that the man that had raped and killed this girl was
    in the process of disposing of her body, when he took a couple things.

    The more I think about it the more it seems logical that he might have
    taken a shoe or two.  Why?   Because the man would be at a disadvantage without shoes to protect his feet.

    There has to be  a reason for all the questions posed by the investigators
    about shoes, and shoe size.  Maybe they were trying to tie Joran in with
    the shoes.  Why else would it matter if he were barefoot or not.  This is
    Aruba... warm most the time.... I'm sure that people walk barefoot some-
    times and people think nothing of it.


    What I mean is that if the man from Columbia had been seen and the
    rapist had decided to take chase... wouldn't a man with shoes on his feet
    be at a big, big advantage over a man without shoes.  Especially if it were
    at an area that is similar to the rock area where there is a lot of brush and
    rocky terrain.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 15, 2007, 11:59:43 PM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Could it be some kind of a fad with these peeps to wear shoes that are bigger than they need to be? Like maybe it will attract girls somehow that they are supposed to have big feet?

    There was a, ahem, "theory" about that posed a while back. Not wanting to open that exact line of thought up too much...  :roll: but could there have been a reason WHY Joran wanted to wear big floppy shoes?


    Well, it has always been hypothesized that if you wore a big shoe, you would not need Viagra, so I suppose this could be a part of the bragadocious size 14.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 16, 2007, 12:00:11 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Could it be some kind of a fad with these peeps to wear shoes that are bigger than they need to be? Like maybe it will attract girls somehow that they are supposed to have big feet?

    There was a, ahem, "theory" about that posed a while back. Not wanting to open that exact line of thought up too much...  :roll: but could there have been a reason WHY Joran wanted to wear big floppy shoes?


    You are posted what I was thinking, SB.  Maybe Joran does have small feet for his height.  I always heard big feet, big**** :)   So, with Joran, that would be small feet, small****.  Maybe that's why he was mean and abusive to Natalee as a female.  Dunno  Maybe he had a complex, sota speak


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:00:14 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    My DH wears size 10 1/2 shoes and he's short compared to Joran. Anita has a large foot.  I wear a size 8 and my foot looks small.  Her foot is more like a 9 or even a 10.  Why don't they just measure those feet?  It is not that hard to find out if he wears a 14.  Maybe the shoes belonged to some big fat guy...let's see who could that be?  Koen?  Steve Croes?  The one that helped may have lost the shoe and they said it was Joran's as a cover.  Well, maybe that's a bit over the top...I will slink off to the corner for a bit.


    A dutch interrogator did check the size show JVDS was wearing in an interview, it was 10.5.



    Yes, he did, Carnut.  Firmly established that Joran was most comfortably wearing a 10.5 shoe size in jail.

    And since he played tennis, I don't think he could wear lose fitting shoes without getting blisters especially on the bottoms of toes.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 16, 2007, 12:01:30 AM
    i still say abandoned septic tank

    they can be opened in 5 minutes very easily, as many have handles (2)

    in case people dont know much about them

    picture a man hole cover, and there is a holding tank usually made of concrete or cement holding several hundred gallons of water
     

    easy and quick


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:02:28 AM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I think it was a cistern, which is like an underground water collection/storage, instead of a septic tank that some believe Natalee was put into on the Sloots property.  (You know the place.  The one that was supposedly searched, and then we found they only searched a small part of it.  Which is the same one that Paulus wouldn't let Equisearch check out.  Uh-huh...)

    Yep - TES was only able to search from the next door neighbors side.  PVDS would not allow TES on his property.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 12:03:37 AM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I still think that there might be something to this witness that has been
    discredited and deported to Columbia.

    He said that he had taken a couple things, after witnessing a rape and
    murder.  He said that the man that had raped and killed this girl was
    in the process of disposing of her body, when he took a couple things.

    The more I think about it the more it seems logical that he might have
    taken a shoe or two.  Why?   Because the man would be at a disadvantage without shoes to protect his feet.

    There has to be  a reason for all the questions posed by the investigators
    about shoes, and shoe size.  Maybe they were trying to tie Joran in with
    the shoes.  Why else would it matter if he were barefoot or not.  This is
    Aruba... warm most the time.... I'm sure that people walk barefoot some-
    times and people think nothing of it.


    Let's say you are right...how do find this witness now?  Is he still alive?  How would anyone know?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 16, 2007, 12:03:50 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    i still say abandoned septic tank

    they can be opened in 5 minutes very easily, as many have handles (2)

    in case people dont know much about them

    picture a man hole cover, and there is a holding tank usually made of concrete or cement holding several hundred gallons of water
     

    easy and quick

    I know what you mean.  My house is still on a septic.  I just thought the place that was discussed about the Sloots was a cistern.   Granny Toad from RWV had some interesting theories about it


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:03:58 AM
    Quote from: Tylergal
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Maybe... but what would they have had to compare the imprint with?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:05:08 AM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I still think that there might be something to this witness that has been
    discredited and deported to Columbia.

    He said that he had taken a couple things, after witnessing a rape and
    murder.  He said that the man that had raped and killed this girl was
    in the process of disposing of her body, when he took a couple things.

    The more I think about it the more it seems logical that he might have
    taken a shoe or two.  Why?   Because the man would be at a disadvantage without shoes to protect his feet.

    There has to be  a reason for all the questions posed by the investigators
    about shoes, and shoe size.  Maybe they were trying to tie Joran in with
    the shoes.  Why else would it matter if he were barefoot or not.  This is
    Aruba... warm most the time.... I'm sure that people walk barefoot some-
    times and people think nothing of it.


    What I mean is that if the man from Columbia had been seen and the
    rapist had decided to take chase... wouldn't a man with shoes on his feet
    be at a big, big advantage over a man without shoes.  Especially if it were
    at an area that is similar to the rock area where there is a lot of brush and
    rocky terrain.

    Except this man didn't even come forward until approx a year later.   :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:05:24 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Could it be some kind of a fad with these peeps to wear shoes that are bigger than they need to be? Like maybe it will attract girls somehow that they are supposed to have big feet?

    There was a, ahem, "theory" about that posed a while back. Not wanting to open that exact line of thought up too much...  :roll: but could there have been a reason WHY Joran wanted to wear big floppy shoes?

     

     LOL SB  :wink:  I think I know where you are going with this.
     I dunno if anyone ever came to a real conclusion about the shoes.
      IMO thery are out there.. but where? who has them? Or even one shoe for that matter?  Kalpoes perhaps?   This shoe thingy had always been a mystery.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 16, 2007, 12:05:52 AM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "robots"
    i still say abandoned septic tank

    they can be opened in 5 minutes very easily, as many have handles (2)

    in case people dont know much about them

    picture a man hole cover, and there is a holding tank usually made of concrete or cement holding several hundred gallons of water
     

    easy and quick

    I know what you mean.  My house is still on a septic.  I just thought the place that was discussed about the Sloots was a cistern.   Granny Toad from RWV had some interesting theories about it


    yep, sloots is a CESSPOOL,,, well at least most of the family is  8)  :twisted:

    mine is also a septic system because i live in the sticks  8)  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 12:06:20 AM
    I don't have a theory about the shoes, but I am pretty sure JVDS somehow lost/left behind a pair of shoes that night, and it is significant.

    The following is from DK's 06/13/2005 statement, which he signed. There had been several references to JVDS mentioning being barefoot, retrieving shoes, etc.

    But this is the part that sounds very "real" to me, like a genuine slip-up. DK is describing the entourage going to the HI after the driveway meeting.

    Quote
    Between 03:20 hours and 03:25 hours [3:20-3:25 am], we had arrived at the Holiday Inn Hotel. When we arrived there, the police officer(s) went to the manager of the security guards to try and get the details of the security guards that worked at the hotel. We had remained outside in front of the entrance. We just waited. Joran and his dad were talking at the police car. I could not hear what they were saying. I stood at one of the concrete beam/pillar in front of the lobby. The man [Charles Croes]  who had driven the green Yaris called me to come over to where he was. I went over to him. The man was sitting in the car. The man asked me in Papiamentu whether or not the story we told was true. I said yes to him. During the conversation I had with him I had for one reason or another shot my mouth off and said something about the sporting shoes. The man asked me what I meant by sporting shoes. I then said to him that I was thinking about something unrelated/different.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:07:41 AM
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 16, 2007, 12:08:28 AM
    Quote from: Patti
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Maybe... but what would they have had to compare the imprint with?


    Patti, I am sorry to seem graphic, but if she was kicked, it may have left imprints or marks on her body :(   Even if the shoes he wore that night couldn't be found, it might be possible if Natalee had been recovered early on, the shoe size could be figured out.  Sometimes amazing things can be found.  But then, sometimes folks watch CSI and we all expect forensics and such to be a lot better and faster than it really is in life.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:10:59 AM
    Red posted this back in July 2006:

    (http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a118/kath8700/aruba164.jpg)

    Yup, Red was there. As a matter of a fact ... Red took this picture.

    The Search of Paul VDS’s neighbor’s property, Part II
    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/08/04/pictures-from-august-04-2005/

    They searched (Joe Huston) with Vision Stick

    What is important to remember there was a sewer (which you are looking at here) and a water resevoir that was loacated.


    This is the search of the well/water resevoir on neighbors property:

    Texas EquuSearch Returns for further inspection of VDS’s Neighbors Property

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/08/02/pictures-from-the-reservoir/


    Here is the post on the rest of the search that was done on the neighbor's property.

    The one that should have been done on the VDS property.

    EquuSearch searches Neighbor’s Property Next To Van Der Sloot House

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/08/02/van-der-sloot-house/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:11:21 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I still think that there might be something to this witness that has been
    discredited and deported to Columbia.

    He said that he had taken a couple things, after witnessing a rape and
    murder.  He said that the man that had raped and killed this girl was
    in the process of disposing of her body, when he took a couple things.

    The more I think about it the more it seems logical that he might have
    taken a shoe or two.  Why?   Because the man would be at a disadvantage without shoes to protect his feet.

    There has to be  a reason for all the questions posed by the investigators
    about shoes, and shoe size.  Maybe they were trying to tie Joran in with
    the shoes.  Why else would it matter if he were barefoot or not.  This is
    Aruba... warm most the time.... I'm sure that people walk barefoot some-
    times and people think nothing of it.


    Let's say you are right...how do find this witness now?  Is he still alive?  How would anyone know?


    WELL, for one thing... if the investigators had, indeed, been questioning
    Joran based on this eye-witness statements, then there would have to be a record of it, wouldn't there?  Under normal circumstances there would
    be anyway.  Maybe it's in that box of stuff that was sent to Holland.

    The one thing that I don't like about their witness statements is that it
    doesn't include the investigators questions.  I think that if that were
    included, we could have a better indication why he continually says things
    in his statements like, "she wanted me to have sex with her, but I didn't
    have a condom"... the mentioning of NOT having a condom, may be an
    indication that the officer was questioning him about a condom as well.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:11:40 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!

    I don't think Pitbull was as tall as Joran.  He was stockier, IMO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 12:11:52 AM
    Quote from: MuffyBee
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Maybe... but what would they have had to compare the imprint with?


    Patti, I am sorry to seem graphic, but if she was kicked, it may have left imprints or marks on her body :(   Even if the shoes he wore that night couldn't be found, it might be possible if Natalee had been recovered early on, the shoe size could be figured out.  Sometimes amazing things can be found.  But then, sometimes folks watch CSI and we all expect forensics and such to be a lot better and faster than it really is in life.


    Forensics can go either way, if a body is found with identifable material on it or if an item is found with something identifiable on the item.

    Body with shoe material on it or shoe with blood/DNA on them.

    Course, no body, no forensics on body.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 12:13:43 AM
    Evening Monkeys. Here to offer my opinion about Jorans shoe size. I think it is most likely that he does wear a size 14. My husband is 6'3" and wears a 13. My daughter is 5'9" and at 16 wears a girls 10.5. I think it would be anatomically disproportionally small for someone Jorans size to wear a 10.5 size shoe JMHO. 8)



    (http://lambiek.net/artists/t/taras_martin/taras_babyhuey.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:14:24 AM
    Quote from: Carnut
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Maybe... but what would they have had to compare the imprint with?


    Patti, I am sorry to seem graphic, but if she was kicked, it may have left imprints or marks on her body :(   Even if the shoes he wore that night couldn't be found, it might be possible if Natalee had been recovered early on, the shoe size could be figured out.  Sometimes amazing things can be found.  But then, sometimes folks watch CSI and we all expect forensics and such to be a lot better and faster than it really is in life.


    Forensics can go either way, if a body is found with identifable material on it or if an item is found with something identifiable on the item.

    Body with shoe material on it or shoe with blood/DNA on them.

    Course, no body, no forensics on body.


    "When they find the girl, they are going to see all that shit..."

    "I will laugh if they find the girl..."

    What shit?  DNA, shoe prints, what shit?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 12:16:01 AM
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 12:16:40 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:16:57 AM
    I knew what Muffy was saying... but there was no body to compare the
    imprints with... there had to be another reason why those shoes were
    so important.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 12:17:33 AM
    O/T

    Patti/Klaas? Do you have a "clean" avatar for Patti? If so, could you post it, please? TIA!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 12:18:00 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    Typical arubacide.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:19:09 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    The Arubans told us he killed himself with an overdose, do you not remember that and later we found that he had been amputated, eviscerated and and sat on fire?  It was a play on words; however, I guess I did not make myself clear enough.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:20:59 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 12:21:23 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    The Arubans told us he killed himself with an overdose, do you not remember that and later we found that he had been amputated, eviscerated and and sat on fire?  It was a play on words; however, I guess I did not make myself clear enough.


    ... and crucified ....


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 12:21:24 AM
    How tall is Joran, anyway? My son is 6ft 2in and wears a size 14 shoe. (He'd be a lot taller if so much of him weren't turned in-under).  :wink:

    John wears a 10 and is only 5ft 10in.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:22:43 AM
    I believe the article about the Dutch Interrogator verifying the shoe size as 10.5 appeared in Diario, was one of those first published there.

    Klaas may remember exactly but it was very specific and the interrogator measured the foot as well just as ******* said.

    I wonder why no more PV statements have been released.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 12:23:32 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Yes, and went on an anti-TES thing. That's when I stopped reading there. (I had never heard of TES at the time. But Dan's jealousy was palpable.)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 12:25:01 AM
    I'm glad you said that Anna. The shoes are such an important component to this case: Joran has said that in so many ways!

    I have always wanted to know if anyone measured his foot, and what size it was.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 12:25:04 AM
    So - no one is going to explain the Waldorf Salad thingie?  :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:25:19 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    O/T

    Patti/Klaas? Do you have a "clean" avatar for Patti? If so, could you post it, please? TIA!


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/thWAVING120.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:25:20 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    Typical arubacide.


    He was into multitasking?

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 12:26:17 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    So - no one is going to explain the Waldorf Salad thingie?  :?


    Waldorf Salad? Boy, I've missed something! What's the question?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:26:25 AM
    Quote from: Tylergal
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    Quote from: "Patti"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    Maybe... but what would they have had to compare the imprint with?


    Patti, I am sorry to seem graphic, but if she was kicked, it may have left imprints or marks on her body :(   Even if the shoes he wore that night couldn't be found, it might be possible if Natalee had been recovered early on, the shoe size could be figured out.  Sometimes amazing things can be found.  But then, sometimes folks watch CSI and we all expect forensics and such to be a lot better and faster than it really is in life.


    Forensics can go either way, if a body is found with identifable material on it or if an item is found with something identifiable on the item.

    Body with shoe material on it or shoe with blood/DNA on them.

    Course, no body, no forensics on body.


    "When they find the girl, they are going to see all that shit..."

    "I will laugh if they find the girl..."

    What shit?  DNA, shoe prints, what shit?


    I'm not sure if you're asking me... but I think that Joran was trying to
    convince Deepak that some drugs may have been the reason for
    Natalee's death.  Or that she may have some drugs on her person.
    I am not of that opinion, of course, but it sure kept Deepak under his
    thumb, telling lies for him.

    Lots of things could be shit.... but in my opinion, he was talking about drugs.  Maybe marijauna or cocaine.  But "that shit" could be anything.
    But the fact that he doesn't say, exactly, what it is may be because they
    are riding in the back of a police van.

    Deepak knew what he meant by it and didn't question it... but didn't feel
    threatened about it anymore either, IMO>


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:26:39 AM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/joranshoes.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 12:27:04 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    O/T

    Patti/Klaas? Do you have a "clean" avatar for Patti? If so, could you post it, please? TIA!


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/thWAVING120.gif)


    Oh, you are SO good! Thx, Klaas!!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:27:25 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    So - no one is going to explain the Waldorf Salad thingie?  :?


    msmarple - I'm lost with the Waldorf Salad too


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 16, 2007, 12:27:56 AM
    Gonna call it a night. Y'all are posting SOOOOO fast! Been hard to keep up for about a week now with Monkeys posting from everywhere.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 12:28:03 AM
    I realize no one is talking in Aruba..But I would like to hear from Pitbull's family. They went public because they were unhappy..Then the ALE came out with the suicide/drug overdose theory and we havent heard anything since. Except for the bar that he worked at burned down :shock: ..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:28:42 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..



    Well, for me the real bonkers will always be his writing that front page article claiming that me, Frank and Seedyrum killed Natalee!  He later did a follow up one on me alone, too.  It's sort of funny now but at the time, since I couldn't post anything to defend myself, I really was upset for a bit.  Got over it.  Eventually.  Sort of.  I guess.

     :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:29:20 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    Typical arubacide.

     

    Maybe they had VISTA and their message got f'd up ?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:29:50 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    So - no one is going to explain the Waldorf Salad thingie?  :?


    I think Anna and I have said all we know about it.  In a post by an Aruban it was just asked about of Paulus and Joran and the poster was supposedly one of the kids who attended school with Joran, and he was not wont to answer questions, but just post things such as that.

    I think that is the same one who told us about Joran sleeping in the aisles all day, about having scratches and the teacher taking pictures of them and Joran had the scratches in said picture.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:30:09 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    Typical arubacide.

     

    Maybe they had VISTA and their message got f'd up ?
    :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:30:23 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Gonna call it a night. Y'all are posting SOOOOO fast! Been hard to keep up for about a week now with Monkeys posting from everywhere.

     '


     Night SB and sweet dreams


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 12:30:24 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    Gonna call it a night. Y'all are posting SOOOOO fast! Been hard to keep up for about a week now with Monkeys posting from everywhere.


    Isn't it GRAND!  :smt041
    It used to be even faster! Then you had to BEG folks to catch you up!  :lol:

    Nite sb! Sleep well!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:30:31 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    I believe the article about the Dutch Interrogator verifying the shoe size as 10.5 appeared in Diario, was one of those first published there.

    Klaas may remember exactly but it was very specific and the interrogator measured the foot as well just as ******* said.

    I wonder why no more PV statements have been released.

    .

    Yes, it was first published in Diario but we have that exact statement now posted here.  Remember when Diario published that we didn't have any of the suspect or witness statements.  I think Getagrip has the translation of that Diario article - I'll go find it.

    Yep - scroll down for the article from Diario:

    http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:30:55 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    I'm glad you said that Anna. The shoes are such an important component to this case: Joran has said that in so many ways!
    I have always wanted to know if anyone measured his foot, and what size it was.


    Even Deepak urged people to ask Joran what happened to his shoes!!!

    (That should tell us something)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 12:31:00 AM
    Well heck, what about the 2 TV connected folks who committed arubacide shortly after the DeVries special?

    Heck, I'm sure it was just coincedental, but in aruba how do you know?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:32:02 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    What was the name of the bouncer who eviscerated himself in a cave after taking cocaine?   Was he not a big man!


    I have never heard this to be the case. Is anyone else aware that Pitbull eviscerated himself? Then who cut of his legs, who cut off his privates, nailed him to a board and then set him on fire?


    Typical arubacide.

     

    Maybe they had VISTA and their message got f'd up ?
    :lol:  :lol:


     :wink:  Tyler sweety !


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 12:33:55 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    How tall is Joran, anyway? My son is 6ft 2in and wears a size 14 shoe. (He'd be a lot taller if so much of him weren't turned in-under).  :wink:

    John wears a 10 and is only 5ft 10in.

    I think I recall reading that he is 6'4"


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:34:12 AM
    Goodnight, Sb.  Angie, I hope you will try and get some rest.  The body heals when we are resting, it rejuvenates and good cells replace the bad ones, or something like that.  I can't find out all about it right now because I am not going to wake up a sleeping dog.  My grandmother always warned me to let a sleeping dog lie.  Sometimes it's a bear when it is awakened in the middle of the night.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 12:37:33 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Yes, and went on an anti-TES thing. That's when I stopped reading there. (I had never heard of TES at the time. But Dan's jealousy was palpable.)


    Yup I heard all his bitching..He was very jealous..It is a shame as he did such a great job at the beginning. He was very hatefull of TES and I think that had to do with Red and Tom's relationship with them. I had enough after he posted his "Died of a orgasm threory"  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:38:12 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    I believe the article about the Dutch Interrogator verifying the shoe size as 10.5 appeared in Diario, was one of those first published there.

    Klaas may remember exactly but it was very specific and the interrogator measured the foot as well just as ******* said.

    I wonder why no more PV statements have been released.

    .

    Yes, it was first published in Diario but we have that exact statement now posted here.  Remember when Diario published that we didn't have any of the suspect or witness statements.  I think Getagrip has the translation of that Diario article - I'll go find it.

    Yep - scroll down for the article from Diario:

    http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/


    Excerpt:

    Now, the question is: was Joran brought from the first day to KIA shoeless and had no shoes to wear that it was a fellow prisoner who had to lend Joran a pair of running shoes?

    Van der Sloot’s parents couldn’t bring shoes for Joran to wear, and someone from the prison had to lend him some shoes, and to top it all off they were K-Swiss brand?

    By the way, at KIA they have to register, as in the majority of prisons around the world, what shoes and other belongings each person comes in with, yes or no? On August 8, 2005, the same Dutch police officer asked Joran to take off his shoe, which was a K-Swiss brand running shoe.

    Joran asked to see his lawyer and wanted to find his lawyer’s support, but his lawyer didn’t even look at Joran and started to write (in local dialect, you deal with your problems!) After the Dutch police officer insisted, Joran took off the running shoe and handed it over across the table.

    The police officer asked Joran how in the supposed day that he was with Natalee on the beach, he had size 14 K-Swiss running shoes, then how was the one that Joran put on the table size 10.5?

    After Joran put his running shoe back on, the police pressed on the tip of the running shoes, and observed that the shoes were a good fit on Joran, and Joran didn’t react!

    The matter of the size 14 K-Swiss running shoes is ‘too good to be true’. Was it the shark that Natalee supposedly wanted to see at the North shore that left with Joran van der Sloot’s size 14 running shoes?

    ----------

    So the 10.5 fit Joran nicely no matter whose husband/brother/uncle/nephew wears what size.

    Joran wears a Size 10.5.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:40:00 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Yes, and went on an anti-TES thing. That's when I stopped reading there. (I had never heard of TES at the time. But Dan's jealousy was palpable.)


    Yup I heard all his bitching..He was very jealous..It is a shame as he did such a great job at the beginning. He was very hatefull of TES and I think that had to do with Red and Tom's relationship with them. I had enough after he posted his "Died of a orgasm threory"  :roll:

    Yep, that's what did it for me  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:40:29 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Goodnight, Sb.  Angie, I hope you will try and get some rest.  The body heals when we are resting, it rejuvenates and good cells replace the bad ones, or something like that.  I can't find out all about it right now because I am not going to wake up a sleeping dog.  My grandmother always warned me to let a sleeping dog lie.  Sometimes it's a bear when it is awakened in the middle of the night.

     Night Tyler  :)  Hugs  and great to see you back posting!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:45:51 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Yes, and went on an anti-TES thing. That's when I stopped reading there. (I had never heard of TES at the time. But Dan's jealousy was palpable.)


    Yup I heard all his bitching..He was very jealous..It is a shame as he did such a great job at the beginning. He was very hatefull of TES and I think that had to do with Red and Tom's relationship with them. I had enough after he posted his "Died of a orgasm threory"  :roll:





     that theory was gross.. :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:46:07 AM
    *******,
    Do you remember Selena?  I keep hoping she will surface again.  She was a wonderful researcher and the one who uncovered the Posner presence in Aruba.

    Dan had some tremendous posters but started eliminating any he suspected might be smarter than he was or had more education like Professor and others.  He couldn't stand to be called on anything no matter what he posted late at night and deleted.

    . :roll:

    But I think it was his posters and not Dan that made that such a really good blog in the beginning of this investigation.  And then Dan lost his mind.  That pretty well brought things to a screeching halt.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 12:46:40 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Yes, and went on an anti-TES thing. That's when I stopped reading there. (I had never heard of TES at the time. But Dan's jealousy was palpable.)


    Yup I heard all his bitching..He was very jealous..It is a shame as he did such a great job at the beginning. He was very hatefull of TES and I think that had to do with Red and Tom's relationship with them. I had enough after he posted his "Died of a orgasm threory"  :roll:

    Yep, that's what did it for me  :roll:


    Coincidently that was the same time and reason I left there.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:48:12 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..


    Were you there the night he got the photographs?  The night he went bonkers over Red going to Aruba?  What a self-absorbed small person.


    Yes, and went on an anti-TES thing. That's when I stopped reading there. (I had never heard of TES at the time. But Dan's jealousy was palpable.)


    Yup I heard all his bitching..He was very jealous..It is a shame as he did such a great job at the beginning. He was very hatefull of TES and I think that had to do with Red and Tom's relationship with them. I had enough after he posted his "Died of a orgasm threory"  :roll:

    Yep, that's what did it for me  :roll:


    Coincidently that was the same time and reason I left there.


    And I was "banned for life"  :roll: like when I'm 80 years old I would be trying to post there.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:49:43 AM
    Excerp:

    The police officer asked Joran how in the supposed day that he was with Natalee on the beach, he had size 14 K-Swiss running shoes, then how was the one that Joran put on the table size 10.5?

    ____________

    Joran must have lied in his earlier statement about what size shoe he
    wore and subsequently lost the night that Natalee went missing.

    Maybe they had a size 10.5 in their possession, and, when asked about
    it earlier he said that it couldn't be his shoe because he wears size 14?

    That's kinda what it sounds like to me....


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 12:49:45 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hi, *******,
    Do you remember me from RWV? I was Anna there and sometimes IMHO~Anna. We have posted at the same sites for a very long time, no?  


    I do remember you..lol..Many people here I recognize from  RWV way back early in this nightmare. Boy did Dan Hate SM!! He went bonkers when the paypal link went up here..



    Well, for me the real bonkers will always be his writing that front page article claiming that me, Frank and Seedyrum killed Natalee!  He later did a follow up one on me alone, too.  It's sort of funny now but at the time, since I couldn't post anything to defend myself, I really was upset for a bit.  Got over it.  Eventually.  Sort of.  I guess.

     :roll:


    I vaguely remember somethin about that. Thats crazy!!! What happened to seedyrum? I know he didnt like seedy at all. I think alot had to do with his jealousy. He was losin it big time as I also felt his wrath..lol


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:50:28 AM
    Has anyone seen Dan's reaction to the FP article here about that photo being shopped that is on the FP right now?

    I assume he has seen it by now.  I wonder what he had to say about that.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:52:20 AM
    That orgasm theory was when he hooked up with that nitwit from Hyscience.  What a group of money grubbers.  There are bad people everywhere and these were two examples.

    I wonder if it was the Witch Glenda or the over-inflated scubajap who funded their blogs thereafter with AHATA and other Aruban funds.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 12:54:02 AM
    JUST A P.S.  I posted some information in the Monkey Lounge regards more tainted Chinese food and it might not be just animal food that we are getting that is tainted.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 12:57:15 AM
    :oops:
     so it RWV still up and running?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:58:18 AM
    I'm going to say goodnight, too.

    I have alot to do tomorrow.

    Night, All...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:58:54 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    :oops:
     so it RWV still up and running?


    Oh, yes, he has a fairly popular political blog.  But the NH Forum is by registration only and sort of hidden away.  I hope he is embarrassed by some of the stuff that has been posted there in later times.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Patti on April 16, 2007, 12:59:05 AM
    P.S.

    Hugs to Nemo!!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:00:42 AM
    There's been another development as well. And that is today, for the first time, police are making a public plea to ask for anyone who might have seen a pair of sneakers, tennis shoes, size 14, described as white and blue and brand new.

    http://tinyurl.com/ywgzkl
    ++++++++++

    CANDIOTTI: Well, finally, confirmation that authorities are putting out a public request to be on the lookout, if you will, for a pair of sneakers that Joran, according to law enforcement authorities, claims that he might have lost the night that Natalee went missing, when he was on the beach with her, he said, at that fisherman`s hut area, which is near the Marriott and the Holiday Inn hotels.

    Described as size 14, a pair of brand new sneakers. The brand is K- Swiss.

    GRACE: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait. Size 14, K-Swiss, are those...

    CANDIOTTI: White and blue in color, that`s right. And they`re looking for this pair of brand new sneakers that he told police, as they stressed to me, in one of his many statements, that he might have lost this pair of shoes.

    http://tinyurl.com/2z9jry
    ++++++++++++++
    ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) — Aruban authorities investigating the disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway are looking for a pair of size-14 tennis shoes that suspect Joran van der Sloot might have lost, a police official said.

    http://tinyurl.com/2aom8a
    +++++++++++++
    Aruban authorities said Monday they were looking for a pair of size 14 tennis shoes that van der Sloot might have had on the night Holloway disappeared.

    http://tinyurl.com/2do4wy
    +++++++++++++

    KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker. We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there.

    http://tinyurl.com/2w2jnu


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:01:18 AM
    *******,
    Seedyrum decided to disappear evidently.  I used to hear from Mrs Jimi Hendrix once in a while.  Last I heard Dan had traced Seedy all over the country for she kept using an anonymizer to fool him.

    If she is still around and posting, it is under a different name.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 01:02:06 AM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    I'm going to say goodnight, too.

    I have alot to do tomorrow.

    Night, All...

      Night Patti!!  Sweet Dreams to yah!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 01:03:55 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    *******,
    Do you remember Selena?  I keep hoping she will surface again.  She was a wonderful researcher and the one who uncovered the Posner presence in Aruba.

    Dan had some tremendous posters but started eliminating any he suspected might be smarter than he was or had more education like Professor and others.  He couldn't stand to be called on anything no matter what he posted late at night and deleted.

    . :roll:

    But I think it was his posters and not Dan that made that such a really good blog in the beginning of this investigation.  And then Dan lost his mind.  That pretty well brought things to a screeching halt.

    .


    LOL!! Thats hilarious.. Well he had the email contact with Joran and he was at the right place at the right time. If they googled NH..RWV popped up. I remember selena,maria,dolores and tons of others that made his blog. We heard about the Chicago PI,ATM withdrawls and tons more that wasnt on MSM.

    You are absolutely right about him.. I watched in amazement as he often attacked some of the people I liked best for no reason. He wasnt well thats for sure..He even went after me when I questioned NH leaving with deepak story. He told me he talked to MB student and he had the $900 phone bill to prove it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 16, 2007, 01:05:14 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    My DH got an e-mail from someone in Aruba very early on saying there was a shoe with Natalee's blood on it and that it took place at the HI.


    THE BLOODY TENNIS SHOE

    Beth Twitty
    On the Record w/ Greta
    December 6, 2005


    TWITTY: You know Greta now that you mention it I was looking through my journal and there was an update from an FBI official and also from our family liaison that in one of Joran Van der Sloot's tennis shoes there was blood. I had written that down. I wish that I had been able to obtain more information as to what happened to that one shoe if that was truly blood in his shoe. You know Greta like I said we are just so limited in any type of information we can get.


    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    December 9, 2005


    TWITTY:  ...I mean, I think we need to stay focused on the bloody tennis shoe that was found...
     

    Beth Twitty
    NANCY GRACE
    February 23, 2006


    GRACE: ... Beth, why did he leave his shoes behind?

    TWITTY: You know, that`s been a question all along, Nancy. And I really couldn`t figure out if there was one tennis shoe that he left behind or if it were both.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:05:25 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    There's been another development as well. And that is today, for the first time, police are making a public plea to ask for anyone who might have seen a pair of sneakers, tennis shoes, size 14, described as white and blue and brand new.

    http://tinyurl.com/ywgzkl
    ++++++++++

    CANDIOTTI: Well, finally, confirmation that authorities are putting out a public request to be on the lookout, if you will, for a pair of sneakers that Joran, according to law enforcement authorities, claims that he might have lost the night that Natalee went missing, when he was on the beach with her, he said, at that fisherman`s hut area, which is near the Marriott and the Holiday Inn hotels.

    Described as size 14, a pair of brand new sneakers. The brand is K- Swiss.

    GRACE: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait. Size 14, K-Swiss, are those...

    CANDIOTTI: White and blue in color, that`s right. And they`re looking for this pair of brand new sneakers that he told police, as they stressed to me, in one of his many statements, that he might have lost this pair of shoes.

    http://tinyurl.com/2z9jry
    ++++++++++++++
    ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) — Aruban authorities investigating the disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway are looking for a pair of size-14 tennis shoes that suspect Joran van der Sloot might have lost, a police official said.

    http://tinyurl.com/2aom8a
    +++++++++++++
    Aruban authorities said Monday they were looking for a pair of size 14 tennis shoes that van der Sloot might have had on the night Holloway disappeared.

    http://tinyurl.com/2do4wy
    +++++++++++++

    KOSINSKI:  Police have been pretty tightlipped about this.  There have been rumors about them looking for a shoe in various places.  Today, we know from police they‘re actually looking for a pair of sneakers, K-Swiss blue and white striped sneaker. We even know the size, size 14.  So, they put out some detail there.

    http://tinyurl.com/2w2jnu

    Yep, size 14..that's what they were looking for because that's what size Joran said his shoes were.  That would be a logical size for Joran to wear.  Then HOW is he comfortably wearing a size 10.5 when he's being interrogated?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 01:06:20 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    :oops:
     so it RWV still up and running?


    Oh, yes, he has a fairly popular political blog.  But the NH Forum is by registration only and sort of hidden away.  I hope he is embarrassed by some of the stuff that has been posted there in later times.

    .

      Thanks  Anna  ..!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:07:17 AM
    That must have been one of his many purposeful lies, because when he was interviewed by Greta he clearly stated he wore size 14.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:10:12 AM
    Good night, Patti.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 01:10:40 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    *******,
    Seedyrum decided to disappear evidently.  I used to hear from Mrs Jimi Hendrix once in a while.  Last I heard Dan had traced Seedy all over the country for she kept using an anonymizer to fool him.

    If she is still around and posting, it is under a different name.

    .


    Right.. Almost forgot about Mrs Jimi Hendrix..LMAO!!  I thought her and granny toad started there own blog?

    He told me seedy would know everything about a case from top to bottom and use many diffrent names. SHe emailed me when dan lashed out at me..I think it made her feel better to see someone else face his wrath..LOL.I emailed her about the boston travel show but never heard back.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:11:22 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    That must have been one of his many purposeful lies, because when he was interviewed by Greta he clearly stated he wore size 14.


    Yep, he's always said size 14.  Even Medleyrelay asked him and he told her size 14:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/joranshoes.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:11:49 AM
    Quote from: "Patti"
    P.S.

    Hugs to Nemo!!!!


    Nite Patti


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 01:17:20 AM
    Hey klaas.. Got to tell ya I admire the way you dig up these quotes and articles.. :wink:

    I spent a hour today tryin to find David Kock's interview where he said they all stopped at a bar briefly after C&C. I wanted to know why they stopped at the bar as I forgot what he said. I couldnt find the transcript but I know he mentioned it in a interview in his office as I saw it on TV.

    Two weeks ago I was tryin to find where De Vries said he talked to Paulus on the phone.. Paulus told him that they had lots more to tell but it would hurt too many people...Once again I know I saw him say it on TV but only could find his translation at RU


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:17:45 AM
    Quote
    So the 10.5 fit Joran nicely no matter whose husband/brother/uncle/nephew wears what size.

    Joran wears a Size 10.5.

     
    This shoe size thing is like OJ's bloody glove. Of course a bloodied and then dried glove is going to be tight and hence appear not to fit. This is alittle hard to do with a shoe.  Why not simply then alter the facts? The sneaker(s)
    once reported missing were really a size 10.5, oh yea, that's right (NOT!). But it is pretty safe to say a 10.5 sneaker....even if found will never be traced to JVDS....because he doesn't own a shoe that size. Surely someone else may have lost one but not him.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:19:01 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hey klaas.. Got to tell ya I admire the way you dig up these quotes and articles.. :wink:

    I spent a hour today tryin to find David Kock's interview where he said they all stopped at a bar briefly after C&C. I wanted to know why they stopped at the bar as I forgot what he said. I couldnt find the transcript but I know he mentioned it in a interview in his office as I saw it on TV.

    Two weeks ago I was tryin to find where De Vries said he talked to Paulus on the phone.. Paulus told him that they had lots more to tell but it would hurt too many people...Once again I know I saw him say it on TV but only could find his translation at RU

    Want me to see if I can find them?  I'll try if you want.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:22:40 AM
    So is the shoe a size 10.5 or a 14?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:23:18 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    So is the shoe a size 10.5 or a 14?

    Good question, LOL  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:25:22 AM
    one of the funniest moments I remember at RWV was when we all had to "re-register" and I was not going to register as my DH had already done that and I was going to use his identity, but could not.  Dan wrote me an e-mail and said I had to use mine own, and so we all signed up.  We could use a phony e-mail for publication but but some way or other the system Dan was using published all our e-mails and if you ran your cursor over it, you could see it.  Then we all changed again and Anna changed hers to FBI.  Do you remember that, Anna, and 2-3 days later the self-over-valued Scuba was on there and wiped over Anna's e-mail and it said FBI and she thought Anna was an agent, and she got very confrontational.  Am I the only one who remembers that?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:26:45 AM
    From the quotes I linked to from msn,which were made at  time the events were unfolding, IMO it seems clear the shoes/sneakers were a size 14.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:27:12 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote
    So the 10.5 fit Joran nicely no matter whose husband/brother/uncle/nephew wears what size.

    Joran wears a Size 10.5.

     
    This shoe size thing is like OJ's bloody glove. Of course a bloodied and then dried glove is going to be tight and hence appear not to fit. This is alittle hard to do with a shoe.  Why not simply then alter the facts? The sneaker(s)
    once reported missing were really a size 10.5, oh yea, that's right (NOT!). But it is pretty safe to say a 10.5 sneaker....even if found will never be traced to JVDS....because he doesn't own a shoe that size. Surely someone else may have lost one but not him.



    Well, we do know he had at least one pair that size and they fit him perfectly according to the Dutch interrogator.

    http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/

    Four sizes is a lot.  I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.

    For sure he was up to something with that whopper.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:28:52 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    So is the shoe a size 10.5 or a 14?

    Good question, LOL  :lol:


    Do I get a prize or something?  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:29:00 AM
    Anna wrote;
    Quote
    Four sizes is a lot. I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.


    Anna, let me ask, why do you feel that none of them wore that size shoe?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 01:29:29 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hey klaas.. Got to tell ya I admire the way you dig up these quotes and articles.. :wink:

    I spent a hour today tryin to find David Kock's interview where he said they all stopped at a bar briefly after C&C. I wanted to know why they stopped at the bar as I forgot what he said. I couldnt find the transcript but I know he mentioned it in a interview in his office as I saw it on TV.

    Two weeks ago I was tryin to find where De Vries said he talked to Paulus on the phone.. Paulus told him that they had lots more to tell but it would hurt too many people...Once again I know I saw him say it on TV but only could find his translation at RU

    Want me to see if I can find them?  I'll try if you want.


    Naw thats cool..Its late. We know they stopped at choose-a-name for a quick stop.. Where did you hear this? I dont see any official transcripts.

    I only heard it once from one of the lawyers and I am thinking David Kock. It was in his office and he gave a reason why they stopped. I just forget..I'm curious what the reason was. I think he said deepak ran in to see if a friend was workin but it was his night off or they wanted to have another drink but the bar was closing.. I cant remember..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:32:09 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Anna wrote;
    Quote
    Four sizes is a lot. I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.


    Anna, let me ask, why do you feel that none of them wore that size shoe?



    Did you read the Dairio report on this, BB?  The interrogator checked the 10.5 to his foot and it was a good fit, not too small at all.

    I think Joran selected a size to say he wore which was larger than anyone involved wore so that any shoe found, most especially his own, would immeidately be disregarded and not sent for forensic testing because of being the wrong size.  

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:32:38 AM
    Were the Dutch interrogators friends of the Sloots?  Just asking... :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:32:49 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hey klaas.. Got to tell ya I admire the way you dig up these quotes and articles.. :wink:

    I spent a hour today tryin to find David Kock's interview where he said they all stopped at a bar briefly after C&C. I wanted to know why they stopped at the bar as I forgot what he said. I couldnt find the transcript but I know he mentioned it in a interview in his office as I saw it on TV.

    Two weeks ago I was tryin to find where De Vries said he talked to Paulus on the phone.. Paulus told him that they had lots more to tell but it would hurt too many people...Once again I know I saw him say it on TV but only could find his translation at RU

    Want me to see if I can find them?  I'll try if you want.


    Naw thats cool..Its late. We know they stopped at choose-a-name for a quick stop.. Where did you hear this? I dont see any official transcripts.

    I only heard it once from one of the lawyers and I am thinking David Kock. It was in his office and he gave a reason why they stopped. I just forget..I'm curious what the reason was. I think he said deepak ran in to see if a friend was workin but it was his night off or they wanted to have another drink but the bar was closing.. I cant remember..

    I remember the Kock interview you are referring to.  What I thought he meant is the other bar inside CnC.  In Deepaks statements he mentions driving past Choose A Name but doesn't say they stopped.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:34:50 AM
    Why would Joran not wear shoes to jail?  That doesn't make any sense to me.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 01:37:41 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Hey klaas.. Got to tell ya I admire the way you dig up these quotes and articles.. :wink:

    I spent a hour today tryin to find David Kock's interview where he said they all stopped at a bar briefly after C&C. I wanted to know why they stopped at the bar as I forgot what he said. I couldnt find the transcript but I know he mentioned it in a interview in his office as I saw it on TV.

    Two weeks ago I was tryin to find where De Vries said he talked to Paulus on the phone.. Paulus told him that they had lots more to tell but it would hurt too many people...Once again I know I saw him say it on TV but only could find his translation at RU

    Want me to see if I can find them?  I'll try if you want.


    Naw thats cool..Its late. We know they stopped at choose-a-name for a quick stop.. Where did you hear this? I dont see any official transcripts.

    I only heard it once from one of the lawyers and I am thinking David Kock. It was in his office and he gave a reason why they stopped. I just forget..I'm curious what the reason was. I think he said deepak ran in to see if a friend was workin but it was his night off or they wanted to have another drink but the bar was closing.. I cant remember..

    I remember the Kock interview you are referring to.  What I thought he meant is the other bar inside CnC.  In Deepaks statements he mentions driving past Choose A Name but doesn't say they stopped.


    That's the way I always understood it, the two bars were inside CnC's nd not a stop at a bar after CnC's, just a driveby one as an assist in showing direction of travel from CnC's.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:38:31 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Anna wrote;
    Quote
    Four sizes is a lot. I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.


    Anna, let me ask, why do you feel that none of them wore that size shoe?



    Did you read the Dairio report on this, BB?  The interrogator checked the 10.5 to his foot and it was a good fit, not too small at all.

    I think Joran selected a size to say he wore which was larger than anyone involved wore so that any shoe found, most especially his own, would immeidately be disregarded and not sent for forensic testing because of being the wrong size.  

    .


    If you have a link to the Diario report I'd be glad to read it. When was it from?

    I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one Anna. There were just to many early reports about one missing size 14 sneaker early in the case for me to think otherwise.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 01:39:11 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    From the quotes I linked to from msn,which were made at  time the events were unfolding, IMO it seems clear the shoes/sneakers were a size 14.


    That's just the point, there are no size 14 shoes, only the size 10.5 that JVDS was found to be wearing in jail when interviewed.

    The size 14 is the red herring.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:39:31 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Were the Dutch interrogators friends of the Sloots?  Just asking... :roll:


    If they were, I don't think they would be exposing Li'l Joran's ruse about the shoe size like that.  But ALE sure jumped on Joran's story and told it as the truth.  Those would be the friends of Sloots.

    Jossy sure doesn't think he wears a Size 14 and seems to think it pretty amusing that Joran was caught in such a bald faced lie like that.

    Well, guess it is yet another thing on which we all have our own opinions, not really important I don't suppose, just one of many details still in dispute.  But actually measuring a shoe Size 10.5 on his foot would seem to indicate, at least to me, that this was in fact the size that he wore.  Otherwise, he would have been wearing Size 14.

    JMO.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:40:04 AM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    I remember all the shoe/shoe size discussions.  Shoes are such an issue with this case.  And how is this significant?  What is Joran's REAL shoe size?  I mean, couldn't someone get one of those shoe sizer thingys and measure it?  Is the shoe thing a red herring?  Makes me wonder if he kicked or stamped on Natalee, leaving footprints :evil:


    My DH got an e-mail from someone in Aruba very early on saying there was a shoe with Natalee's blood on it and that it took place at the HI.


    THE BLOODY TENNIS SHOE

    Beth Twitty
    On the Record w/ Greta
    December 6, 2005


    TWITTY: You know Greta now that you mention it I was looking through my journal and there was an update from an FBI official and also from our family liaison that in one of Joran Van der Sloot's tennis shoes there was blood. I had written that down. I wish that I had been able to obtain more information as to what happened to that one shoe if that was truly blood in his shoe. You know Greta like I said we are just so limited in any type of information we can get.


    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    December 9, 2005


    TWITTY:  ...I mean, I think we need to stay focused on the bloody tennis shoe that was found...
     

    Beth Twitty
    NANCY GRACE
    February 23, 2006


    GRACE: ... Beth, why did he leave his shoes behind?

    TWITTY: You know, that`s been a question all along, Nancy. And I really couldn`t figure out if there was one tennis shoe that he left behind or if it were both.


    You know I jmust have missed that interview, or maybe I just let it go over my head, but this person I assumed to be someone involved in the case who used to send e-mails to DH.  He always used a different e-mail address and any e-mail we tried to send bounced back, but the email came regularly for a long time and then it suddenly stopped, but this person knew enough about the case and everybody involved that he was someone who was in the know and he knew more about things that have never been mentioned in public and things I will not write here or anyplace else since I cannot confirm them, but he knew a lot.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 01:41:37 AM
    I remember the Kock interview you are referring to. What I thought he meant is the other bar inside CnC. In Deepaks statements he mentions driving past Choose A Name but doesn't say they stopped.
    _________________

    I remember vividly saying that they stopped at another bar down the street after C&C and deepak ran in for a brief moment..He came back out and they left..It was kind of surprising because we re-hashed the events over and over again and I never heard this. I couldnt find it on transcript but its on film somewhere at fox or nbc.:D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:43:09 AM
    Quote from: Anna
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote
    So the 10.5 fit Joran nicely no matter whose husband/brother/uncle/nephew wears what size.

    Joran wears a Size 10.5.

     
    This shoe size thing is like OJ's bloody glove. Of course a bloodied and then dried glove is going to be tight and hence appear not to fit. This is alittle hard to do with a shoe.  Why not simply then alter the facts? The sneaker(s)
    once reported missing were really a size 10.5, oh yea, that's right (NOT!). But it is pretty safe to say a 10.5 sneaker....even if found will never be traced to JVDS....because he doesn't own a shoe that size. Surely someone else may have lost one but not him.



    Well, we do know he had at least one pair that size and they fit him perfectly according to the Dutch interrogator.

    http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/

    Four sizes is a lot.  I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.

    For sure he was up to something with that whopper.

    ----------

    Here it is again, BB.  It's on Getagrip's website.  Boy, do I miss her.  She was so smart to teach herself Papiamento and help us so!

    Carnut,
    Exactly!  There was no Size 14 for anybody to find!  That's pretty safe and sure way not to have the shoe found.  Best way I can think of and apparently Joran, too.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:44:43 AM
    Quote from: "*******"
    I remember the Kock interview you are referring to. What I thought he meant is the other bar inside CnC. In Deepaks statements he mentions driving past Choose A Name but doesn't say they stopped.
    _________________

    I remember vividly saying that they stopped at another bar down the street after C&C and deepak ran in for a brief moment..He came back out and they left..It was kind of surprising because we re-hashed the events over and over again and I never heard this. I couldnt find it on transcript but its on film somewhere at fox or nbc.:D


    I remember that too and I think we all knew the name of that bar and it was not Choose-a-Name --- it was a bar where Dash had said some of the other MB kids were that night, and that "we had gone there" to see if anyone was left behind there.  That is supposedly when they saw Natalee and she was yelling out the window (never proven true) and it seems like the bar was in an area where there might have been a game room at an intersection.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:45:51 AM
    ******* - Here is the translation of the DeVries show:

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=587


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:46:08 AM
    Joran could have just as easily said he wore a Size 3, too, they wouldn't be likely to find one of those either.

     :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:47:04 AM
    And to this day they are still on the lookout for those size 14 shoes.  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:49:29 AM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/RouteSatalite17-1.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 01:50:01 AM
    Found this an interesting comment in Satish Kalpoe's May 31st Statement.....hmmmmmmm
     ++++++++++++++
    Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

    "last Sunday, around 22.00, I picked up my brother Deepak at his work. My brother works at the Internet Cafe established in the Seaport Marketplace. After I had picked up my brother, we drove home. When we arrived at home, Deepak asked me if I wanted to go with him and Joran to Carlos & Charlies. I answered yes, I would to with them to Carlos & Charlies. (With Deepak and Joran the witnesses Deepak Sharma KALPOE and Joran Andreas Petrus van der SLOOT is meant: observation JACOBS) Around 23.30 Deepak and I went to pick up Joran at its house. I don’t know his address not but I can designate to you his house. Then Deepak and I arrived at Joran’s house and we walked in to his apartment, because Joran was busy finishing with homework and printing. After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos & Charlies. Around 11.45 we stepped into the bldg.. I saw that there was 60 or 70 persons in the bldg.. All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself. We stood then at the dancing floor/stage for a while and I saw that several persons were dancing. I saw that white blonde haired girl was dancing and then she saw Joran and came over to him and said to him in English: Hi, how are you? (Hello, how goes it?; observation JACOBS) Joran started to dance hereafter with white girl with blonde hair. I only walked around then. According to me my brother with Joran lagged behind. I walked around in the bldg. of Carlos & Charlies but I did not run to (?). After I had walked around, I met Deepak and Joran at the dancing floor/stage. Then the three of us agreed that it was too boring at Carlos & Charlies and that we would go to the house (home?). I saw that Joran was talking with the white girl.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:52:46 AM
    Jossy says the shoe was measured on Joran's foot and was a good fit.  The shoe that was measured was a 10.5 that fit Joran and that he was wearing in jail.

    He did not go to the jail without shoes and borrow some.  He was afraid he was going to get caught in the Size 14 whopper and made that up about borrowing a pair.

    Even if he had borrowed a pair of shoes, it wouldn't make his feet shrink to fit them.

    Ergo, he wore Size 10.5.

    Only to my own way of thinking and I don't have any reason to try to convice anybody else.  That's just how I arrive at that assumption.  Shoe fit and was 10.5 so that means he wore that size shoe and not four sizes larger.  

    .

    *******,
    I do remember that about stopping at another bar and like you, I thought they meant at a different location.

    If I see anything on that I will post.  Not sure but thought Deepak was the one who said that.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 01:53:51 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Found this an interesting comment in Satish Kalpoe's May 31st Statement.....hmmmmmmm
     ++++++++++++++
    Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

    "last Sunday, around 22.00, I picked up my brother Deepak at his work. My brother works at the Internet Cafe established in the Seaport Marketplace. After I had picked up my brother, we drove home. When we arrived at home, Deepak asked me if I wanted to go with him and Joran to Carlos & Charlies. I answered yes, I would to with them to Carlos & Charlies. (With Deepak and Joran the witnesses Deepak Sharma KALPOE and Joran Andreas Petrus van der SLOOT is meant: observation JACOBS) Around 23.30 Deepak and I went to pick up Joran at its house. I don’t know his address not but I can designate to you his house. Then Deepak and I arrived at Joran’s house and we walked in to his apartment, because Joran was busy finishing with homework and printing. After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos & Charlies. Around 11.45 we stepped into the bldg.. I saw that there was 60 or 70 persons in the bldg.. All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself. We stood then at the dancing floor/stage for a while and I saw that several persons were dancing. I saw that white blonde haired girl was dancing and then she saw Joran and came over to him and said to him in English: Hi, how are you? (Hello, how goes it?; observation JACOBS) Joran started to dance hereafter with white girl with blonde hair. I only walked around then. According to me my brother with Joran lagged behind. I walked around in the bldg. of Carlos & Charlies but I did not run to (?). After I had walked around, I met Deepak and Joran at the dancing floor/stage. Then the three of us agreed that it was too boring at Carlos & Charlies and that we would go to the house (home?). I saw that Joran was talking with the white girl.


    Aside from the disagreement from JVDS as who bought the drinks and that JVDS said he didn't dance with anyone, it seems to support the idea that they all were headed for the sloot dump.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:54:33 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Found this an interesting comment in Satish Kalpoe's May 31st Statement.....hmmmmmmm
     ++++++++++++++
    Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

    "last Sunday, around 22.00, I picked up my brother Deepak at his work. My brother works at the Internet Cafe established in the Seaport Marketplace. After I had picked up my brother, we drove home. When we arrived at home, Deepak asked me if I wanted to go with him and Joran to Carlos & Charlies. I answered yes, I would to with them to Carlos & Charlies. (With Deepak and Joran the witnesses Deepak Sharma KALPOE and Joran Andreas Petrus van der SLOOT is meant: observation JACOBS) Around 23.30 Deepak and I went to pick up Joran at its house. I don’t know his address not but I can designate to you his house. Then Deepak and I arrived at Joran’s house and we walked in to his apartment, because Joran was busy finishing with homework and printing. After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos & Charlies. Around 11.45 we stepped into the bldg.. I saw that there was 60 or 70 persons in the bldg.. All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself. We stood then at the dancing floor/stage for a while and I saw that several persons were dancing. I saw that white blonde haired girl was dancing and then she saw Joran and came over to him and said to him in English: Hi, how are you? (Hello, how goes it?; observation JACOBS) Joran started to dance hereafter with white girl with blonde hair. I only walked around then. According to me my brother with Joran lagged behind. I walked around in the bldg. of Carlos & Charlies but I did not run to (?). After I had walked around, I met Deepak and Joran at the dancing floor/stage. Then the three of us agreed that it was too boring at Carlos & Charlies and that we would go to the house (home?). I saw that Joran was talking with the white girl.


    That isn't the only thing that doesn't match the other stories.  The first time it was stated that Joran bought them the whisky coke or yards and knew what they wanted so he didn't have to ask.  As Robots would say...LOAD ALERT!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 16, 2007, 01:55:27 AM
    Hugs to Nemo and CP

     Night all


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:56:18 AM
    Mambo Jambo.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:56:46 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Hugs to Nemo and CP

     Night all


    Night Angie. Little Patti hugged Nemo tonight too.  That little doggie sure is popular.  Hugs to Nemo.  See you guys later.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:57:19 AM
    The MB kid who supposedly saw Natalee going to the Carpool taxi was sitting on a "deck?" at Bahia.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:58:23 AM
    goodnight, lala's.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:58:35 AM
    Joran = Big Spender?  In his own mind?  He really irks me using even this to enhance his image.  Another example is saying he helped win money back for Natalee when in fact he didn't help anybody win anything and lost $250 himself!

    But to lie to enhance ones own image at a time like that??

    And with that, I am off to the Monkey Bunkey.  That remote viewer is on Art Bell so I will listen until I fall asleep which will likely be all of five minutes, lol!

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 01:59:26 AM
    Anna, can I get Art Bell on the PC?  I have adjusted my atenna and polished my tin foil and want to listen.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 02:01:35 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Found this an interesting comment in Satish Kalpoe's May 31st Statement.....hmmmmmmm
     ++++++++++++++
    Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

    "last Sunday, around 22.00, I picked up my brother Deepak at his work. My brother works at the Internet Cafe established in the Seaport Marketplace. After I had picked up my brother, we drove home. When we arrived at home, Deepak asked me if I wanted to go with him and Joran to Carlos & Charlies. I answered yes, I would to with them to Carlos & Charlies. (With Deepak and Joran the witnesses Deepak Sharma KALPOE and Joran Andreas Petrus van der SLOOT is meant: observation JACOBS) Around 23.30 Deepak and I went to pick up Joran at its house. I don’t know his address not but I can designate to you his house. Then Deepak and I arrived at Joran’s house and we walked in to his apartment, because Joran was busy finishing with homework and printing. After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos & Charlies. Around 11.45 we stepped into the bldg.. I saw that there was 60 or 70 persons in the bldg.. All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself. We stood then at the dancing floor/stage for a while and I saw that several persons were dancing. I saw that white blonde haired girl was dancing and then she saw Joran and came over to him and said to him in English: Hi, how are you? (Hello, how goes it?; observation JACOBS) Joran started to dance hereafter with white girl with blonde hair. I only walked around then. According to me my brother with Joran lagged behind. I walked around in the bldg. of Carlos & Charlies but I did not run to (?). After I had walked around, I met Deepak and Joran at the dancing floor/stage. Then the three of us agreed that it was too boring at Carlos & Charlies and that we would go to the house (home?). I saw that Joran was talking with the white girl.


    That isn't the only thing that doesn't match the other stories.  The first time it was stated that Joran bought them the whisky coke or yards and knew what they wanted so he didn't have to ask.  As Robots would say...LOAD ALERT!


    I just found it interesting that Satish is stating the 3 of them(J2K) mentioned going to the house , what house is he refering to?, does he mean Jorans or who's?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 02:02:32 AM
    GOODNIGHT ALL!  Will be working and lurking tomorrow!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 02:03:03 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "*******"
    I remember the Kock interview you are referring to. What I thought he meant is the other bar inside CnC. In Deepaks statements he mentions driving past Choose A Name but doesn't say they stopped.
    _________________

    I remember vividly saying that they stopped at another bar down the street after C&C and deepak ran in for a brief moment..He came back out and they left..It was kind of surprising because we re-hashed the events over and over again and I never heard this. I couldnt find it on transcript but its on film somewhere at fox or nbc.:D


    I remember that too and I think we all knew the name of that bar and it was not Choose-a-Name --- it was a bar where Dash had said some of the other MB kids were that night, and that "we had gone there" to see if anyone was left behind there.  That is supposedly when they saw Natalee and she was yelling out the window (never proven true) and it seems like the bar was in an area where there might have been a game room at an intersection.


    Interesting..I think some of the blogs have gathered that they stopped at choose-a-name..That was relation to pitbull and then it being burned down..I'm not sure...I know Dave and Art responded to me when I asked about pitbull at BFN chat. They both had something to say.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 02:04:00 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Anna, can I get Art Bell on the PC?  I have adjusted my atenna and polished my tin foil and want to listen.



    Try this, Tyler

    http://kfiam640.com/cc-common/streaming_new/index.html?refreshed=yes


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 02:05:04 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    The MB kid who supposedly saw Natalee going to the Carpool taxi was sitting on a "deck?" at Bahia.


    Alot of the places there have open 2nd floors, Mambo Jambo , Bahia, Iguana Joes.

    (http://www.worldclips.tv/images/dynamic/CafeBahia-zooms.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 02:06:14 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Anna, can I get Art Bell on the PC?  I have adjusted my atenna and polished my tin foil and want to listen.



    Try this, Tyler

    http://kfiam640.com/cc-common/streaming_new/index.html?refreshed=yes


    Yep, I hate it when I have to sleep in my tin foil hat!  My hair is a mess all the next day!

     :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 02:06:32 AM
    Night Klaas and all other Monkeys still in the cage, I'm heading out to. Goodnight


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 02:13:30 AM
    Got it, Anna, thanks.

    Goodnight, all.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 02:14:28 AM
    No, I mean the place that Dash said they were going was Mambo Jambo and the place the guy said he was watching from was Bahia.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 02:15:41 AM
    I remember the FBI thing at RWV and that was hilarious!! Almost as funny as when Dan was banning people left and right..But that was back when everyone was waiting in line to ask scubajap questions :roll: Yuck!!!

    Nighty Nite Everyone!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Leslie on April 16, 2007, 07:07:53 AM
    Diario
    http://www.diarioaruba.com/
    Amigoe
    http://www.amigoe.com/english/
    BonDia
    http://www.cspnv.com/
    Solo di Pueblo
    http://www.solodipueblo.com/
    Aruba Today
    http://www.arubatoday.com/
    Translator:
    http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Leslie on April 16, 2007, 07:14:19 AM
    From Diario:   Part of today's Editorial by Jossy Mansur:
    Dia cu mi a bisa cu e Gobierno di Nel Oduber ta anti-Americano tambe, mi a bin cu e pruebanan pa demostre, pero mi a laga un banda otronan cu ta hopi doloroso pa Nel, sinembargo, ya cu el a bolbe perde cabez manera di custumbra, sin por pone control riba su lenga di shishi, ata mas di e pruebanan ey: Natalee Holloway (Americano) y e mucha muher Americano cu su yiu a maltrata y djey kier a rape (viola) den su propio cas! E tata, un Panameño, a manda tur e recaudonan pa mi, incluyendo raportnan clinico di maltrato fisico, y mi no a publica tur pa motibo di discrecion y consideracion pa un persona cu no merece.
    Kico Nel su gobierno a haci den e caso di Natalee? Sconde cabez manera un avestruz pa no mira e berdad di loke tabata pasando; purba core cu Jan y Karin pasobra nan no tabata pertenece na e ja-knikkernan politico di su Gobierno; pone e interes pa e placa di turismo Americano riba e balor di un vida humano; dal tur clase di buelta pa tira e culpa riba e famia di e desaparecido, na lugar di bay all-out contra e tres sospechosonan cu ta e responsablenan di e mal nomber cu Aruba a haya den exterior, y merecidamente pasobra esnan na poder no a lanta un dede pa defende e victimanan, sino a cucuya tras di cortina pa Pueblo kere cu ta e famia ta responsable pa e imagen negativo cu Aruba a haya, y no e tres responsablenan pa un desaparicion cu a ocuri mientras cu e mucha tabata cu nan! E ta un Americano!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 08:59:22 AM
    For what it's worth - here's the online Pap translation. (It was a long editorial and I may have slightly more or less of it here than Leslie posted.)

    Jossy definitely on a tear. Talking about Nelson Oduber and his government being anti-American, demonstrated by victimization of Natalee Holloway and now Michael Saladin too. (As far as I know, he is still being detained, although physically in the hospital per the last story I tried to read.)

    Diario 04/16/2007 - Jossy Mansur editorial (excerpt):

    Quote
    day cu i have tell cu the gobierno of nel oduber is anti-americano also, i have come cu the pruebanan for demostre, but i have let one near others cu is much painful for nel, sinembargo, already cu past owing to go back lose cabez as of custumbra, without can place control on his language of shishi, behold more of the pruebanan ey: natalee holloway (americano) y the child muher americano cu his child owing to maltrata y djey wanted owing to rape (viola) in his own cas! the father, one panameño, owing to send all the recaudonan for my, incluyendo raportnan clinico of maltrato fisico, y my not owing to publica all for motibo of discrecion y consideracion for one person cu not merece. kico nel his gobierno owing to haci in the caso of natalee? sconde cabez as one avestruz for not see the berdad of thing was pasando; try core cu jan y karin because they not was pertenece at the ja-knikkernan politico of his gobierno; place the interest for her coin of turism americano on the value of one vida humano; strike all clase of buelta for throw the culpa on the family of the desaparecido, instead of bay all-out contra the three sospechosonan cu is the responsablenan of the bad name cu aruba owing to achieve in exterior, y merecidamente because esnan at power not owing to arise one finger for defende the victimanan, but owing to cucuya behind cortina for people believe cu is the family is responsable for her imagen negative cu aruba owing to achieve, y not the three responsablenan for one desaparicion cu owing to ocuri while cu the child was cu they! the is one americano! djey his declaracionnan anti-americano of one estupidez increible; y the caso of his son cu wanted owing to viola the child muher americano in his same cas! now have one americano deteni because the will owing to saca one arm contra one person cu owing to ataca his casa, djey owing to comete destruccion contra his property. one gobierno cu owing to caracteriza his self because; uno anti-americano cu hechonan concreto till in his liver!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 09:56:38 AM
    Leslie - Just you and me I guess.

    I've been meaning to thank you for reminding us that we only have 252 days 'til Christmas (as of today).

     :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 10:00:47 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    For what it's worth - here's the online Pap translation. (It was a long editorial and I may have slightly more or less of it here than Leslie posted.)

    Jossy definitely on a tear. Talking about Nelson Oduber and his government being anti-American, demonstrated by victimization of Natalee Holloway and now Michael Saladin too. (As far as I know, he is still being detained, although physically in the hospital per the last story I tried to read.)

    Diario 04/16/2007 - Jossy Mansur editorial (excerpt):

    Quote
    day cu i have tell cu the gobierno of nel oduber is anti-americano also, i have come cu the pruebanan for demostre, but i have let one near others cu is much painful for nel, sinembargo, already cu past owing to go back lose cabez as of custumbra, without can place control on his language of shishi, behold more of the pruebanan ey: natalee holloway (americano) y the child muher americano cu his child owing to maltrata y djey wanted owing to rape (viola) in his own cas! the father, one panameño, owing to send all the recaudonan for my, incluyendo raportnan clinico of maltrato fisico, y my not owing to publica all for motibo of discrecion y consideracion for one person cu not merece. kico nel his gobierno owing to haci in the caso of natalee? sconde cabez as one avestruz for not see the berdad of thing was pasando; try core cu jan y karin because they not was pertenece at the ja-knikkernan politico of his gobierno; place the interest for her coin of turism americano on the value of one vida humano; strike all clase of buelta for throw the culpa on the family of the desaparecido, instead of bay all-out contra the three sospechosonan cu is the responsablenan of the bad name cu aruba owing to achieve in exterior, y merecidamente because esnan at power not owing to arise one finger for defende the victimanan, but owing to cucuya behind cortina for people believe cu is the family is responsable for her imagen negative cu aruba owing to achieve, y not the three responsablenan for one desaparicion cu owing to ocuri while cu the child was cu they! the is one americano! djey his declaracionnan anti-americano of one estupidez increible; y the caso of his son cu wanted owing to viola the child muher americano in his same cas! now have one americano deteni because the will owing to saca one arm contra one person cu owing to ataca his casa, djey owing to comete destruccion contra his property. one gobierno cu owing to caracteriza his self because; uno anti-americano cu hechonan concreto till in his liver!


    Thanks Ms Marple. The English translation will be interesting, this part jumped out:

     place the interest for her coin of turism americano on the value of one vida humano; strike all clase of buelta for throw the culpa on the family of the desaparecido, instead of bay all-out contra the three sospechosonan cu is the responsablenan of the bad name cu aruba owing to achieve


    It looks like he saying they placed the value of tourism dollars over a human life and that they should throw the blame on the perpertrators/suspects who have given Aruba a bad name.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 10:00:53 AM
    Diario editorial 4/16/07 translated by Jossy from Easy's blog (thanks Easy):

    A TRAITOR AND HIS ANTI-ARUBAN GOVERNMENT (2)


    The truth can hurt when it’s exposed without circumlocution! What could have led the mediocrity of the MEP party to lose their heads in such an ugly manner? Could it be the bribery of 1 million guilders? Is that what made them try to look for any distraction from this most shameful anti-Aruban act known in our history? Is it because Nel Oduber is searching for a way out of the atom-bomb that the Namdar offer exploded in his face, and that has converted Neldar into another victim that “can be bought and sold?"

    Gentlemen, go ahead with your attempts to distract the attention from the offered bribery of the most shameful 1 million guilders that exists, and the delivery afterwards of our port to the same foreign group that put that money under the table! Is this or isn’t this the greatest demonstration of anti-Arubanism known until now? Must the Aruban continue on the path of the cross to get his rights, while the foreigners with money can just wave a few bills in their faces to at once get the permits or properties they want? Just consider all the cases that the most anti-Aruban government has lost in court so far! Two great doctors, real Arubans, Lacle and Posner, had to take the path of the cross to get their rights, and even so, are being politically persecuted until this day! Is this, or isn’t this one more demonstration of the most pathetic anti-Arubanism that exists?

    Then Henny Eman and Otmar Oduber, another two Arubans with a long history of political persecution coming from the same Government and members of the MEP party, hungry for vengeance, moved by hate and rancor. They too had to suffer years of political persecution, to finally obtain in Court for the truth to conquer the lies, the slanders, the ridiculous accusations, thrown at them by a Government that has characterized itself as mediocre and totally anti-Aruban!

    And we could go on and on to fill this whole paper with the long list of politically persecuted Arubans, just because they think different and want the good of their people and their island. To expose the truth in a newspaper, on the radio or on television, has become for the anti-Arubans in power the cause for unbelievable hysterics, a drowning in a glass of water, and an attempt to hide the bribery offer of 1 million guilders with shouts coming from the handful of mediocrities at their disposal. Mister Neldar can turn and turn, trying to find any motive that can help him extract himself, but the 1 million guilders hang over his head like the accusation of a judge.

    The day I said that Nel Oduber’s government is anti American too, I came with the proofs to demonstrate it, but I left out a couple very painful for Nel, but since he again lost control over his tongue, here are more proofs: Natalee Holloway (American) and the American girl that his son mistreated and then wanted to rape in his own home! The father, a man from Panama, sent me all the proofs, including clinical reports of physical abuse, and I didn’t publish them for discretion’s sake and for consideration of a person that does not deserve it.

    What did Nel’s government do in the case of Natalee? Hide their heads in a hole like ostriches so as not to see the truth of what was happening, try to fire Jan and Karin because they did not belong to the group of political yes-men of his government; put the interest for American tourism money above the value of a human life; try to throw the blame on the family of the girl that disappeared, instead of going all-out against the three suspects who are responsible for the bad name Aruba got in other countries, and rightly so because those in power did not lift one finger to defend the victim, but went all out behind the curtain to make the family responsible for the negative image Aruba got, and not against the three suspects in whose company the girl disappeared. She too is an American!

    Then his unbelievably stupid anti-American statements; the case of his own son who tried to rape an American girl in his own home! Now there is another American arrested because he pulled a gun against a person that attacked his wife, then committed destruction against her property. A government that has characterized itself as an Anti-American one with unquestionable concrete proofs.

    But, the worst is that this government is principally an Anti-Aruban one that obliges the sons of this island that do not belong to the privileged few of the MEP, to go through a truly torturous process to find their rights! For the foreigner with money? Everything! All they have to do is…let everyone complete the sentence for himself or herself, considering the bribery offer. And for the poor foreigners who come to Aruba with his or her work specialization, another road of the cross! A merciless persecution; an extraction of the little money that they have or can borrow, to obtain the papers for a permit that often never comes! Another inhuman persecution of those that did not come to commit acts against the law (like those that many of the delinquents around Nel did commit, some with judge’s sentences hanging over their heads!), but who came to Aruba to look for a better life and to contribute to our labor market with their talents and know-hows!

    Nel Oduber has become a synonym for political persecution, for implacable hatred, for “can be bought and sold”, of 1 million guilders offered to a traitor willing to deliver our port in the hands of foreigners! This is a handing-over of the worst kind, of a dictatorial attitude never before seen on an island that always held its impeccable democracy in front of the eyes of the world for it to understand that in Aruba the empire of the Law is in command. We can no longer say that! Now our island has become, in the hands of Nel Oduber and his anti Aruban and anti-American government, an island of the abuse of power, of nepotism, of favors to the small group of privileged MEP fanatics, and political persecution against the rest of the population that do not subject themselves to his amens!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Mere on April 16, 2007, 10:09:21 AM
    Good morning friends..... :D

    MsMarple....I read lots of pages from overnight waiting to hear about
    the waldorf salad...did I miss it....?  :?

    Leslie....thanks for the morning papers.

    Thanks to easy for the dario editorial.  Jossy is a strong individual...not
    many in Aruba could take on the government.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Nut44x4 on April 16, 2007, 10:17:32 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Leslie - Just you and me I guess.

    I've been meaning to thank you for reminding us that we only have 252 days 'til Christmas (as of today).

     :lol:



    Well, alrighty then...I have never (well, almost never, lol) had a murderous thought in my life  8) , HOWEVER....msmarple is now on my CHITLIST!! LOL!! ACKkkkkkkkkkkkkk @ Christmas!!! I just want SPRING!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 10:20:42 AM
    Quote
    The day I said that Nel Oduber’s government is anti American too, I came with the proofs to demonstrate it, but I left out a couple very painful for Nel, but since he again lost control over his tongue, here are more proofs: Natalee Holloway (American) and the American girl that his son mistreated and then wanted to rape in his own home! The father, a man from Panama, sent me all the proofs, including clinical reports of physical abuse, and I didn’t publish them for discretion’s sake and for consideration of a person that does not deserve it.

    What did Nel’s government do in the case of Natalee? Hide their heads in a hole like ostriches so as not to see the truth of what was happening, try to fire Jan and Karin because they did not belong to the group of political yes-men of his government; put the interest for American tourism money above the value of a human life; try to throw the blame on the family of the girl that disappeared, instead of going all-out against the three suspects who are responsible for the bad name Aruba got in other countries, and rightly so because those in power did not lift one finger to defend the victim, but went all out behind the curtain to make the family responsible for the negative image Aruba got, and not against the three suspects in whose company the girl disappeared. She too is an American!

    Then his unbelievably stupid anti-American statements; the case of his own son who tried to rape an American girl in his own home! Now there is another American arrested because he pulled a gun against a person that attacked his wife, then committed destruction against her property. A government that has characterized itself as an Anti-American one with unquestionable concrete proofs.


    Wow! Oduber's son tried to rape an American girl - in their HOME?

    Wow! Tried to fire JVDStratten and KJ?

    And Double Wow, yes indeed, all blame on Natalee and her family for the current predicament.

    Well done, Jossy.

    To help Jossy while MEP is boycotting Diario - see my sig line.

    Thanks klaas for posting that. I was about to head for a Spanish tranlator.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 10:20:44 AM
    Thanks for posting that Klaas!

    So Nelson Oduber's son raped a tourist and they covered it up.

    If he'll do that he'll certainly do it for someone who has the goods on his corrupt government. Someone like Paulus Van Der Sloot.

    Jossy is right, there have always been anti-American overtones to this.

    Nelson has a friend. Chavez be his name. This bribery case would be an excellent opportunity to take Oduber down.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 10:22:03 AM
    Quote from: "Nut44x4"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Leslie - Just you and me I guess.

    I've been meaning to thank you for reminding us that we only have 252 days 'til Christmas (as of today).

     :lol:


    Well, alrighty then...I have never (well, almost never, lol) had a murderous thought in my life  8) , HOWEVER....msmarple is now on my CHITLIST!! LOL!! ACKkkkkkkkkkkkkk @ Christmas!!! I just want SPRING!!


    Leslie is still using her Christmas avatar ... just a subtle hint!  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 10:34:31 AM
    Wow, Klaas! Now THAT'S a post worth reading! Thank you for bringing it!
    His son wanted to rape an American girl in his home, huh?
     :shock:  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 10:35:16 AM
    Quote from: "MeMere"
    Good morning friends..... :D

    MsMarple....I read lots of pages from overnight waiting to hear about
    the waldorf salad...did I miss it....?  :?

    Leslie....thanks for the morning papers.

    Thanks to easy for the dario editorial.  Jossy is a strong individual...not
    many in Aruba could take on the government.


    MeMere - Didn't really get much of an answer. I think Tyler said that something about a Waldorf salad came from some kids at Joran's school - but I may have read it wrong.

    Just trying to figure out when someone supposedly tried to feed this to Natalee??? Is that what is supposed to have happened?

    Not really important; just surprised that I don't remember reading a thing about Waldorf Salad from back in those days ...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 10:36:16 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Quote from: "Nut44x4"
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Leslie - Just you and me I guess.

    I've been meaning to thank you for reminding us that we only have 252 days 'til Christmas (as of today).

     :lol:


    Well, alrighty then...I have never (well, almost never, lol) had a murderous thought in my life  8) , HOWEVER....msmarple is now on my CHITLIST!! LOL!! ACKkkkkkkkkkkkkk @ Christmas!!! I just want SPRING!!


    Leslie is still using her Christmas avatar ... just a subtle hint!  :lol:


    Leslie, I'll be happy to find you something if you want a change of clothes?
    Anything in particular?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 10:37:02 AM
    Taking the girls home ... may be the norm.

    Now, about that search warrant that got watered down on the VDS doorstep  ...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 10:40:53 AM
    I'm sorry - I have to emphasize it - that is a riveting statement.

    Tried to rape an American girl at home.

    (Note it doesn't say "rape" - it apparently was an attempt ... let's be careful here.)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 16, 2007, 10:49:26 AM
    O/T

    There's been a shooting at Virginia Tech. 1 dead, 1 wounded. Gunman still on the loose.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 10:52:24 AM
    What do we know about Oduber's son? Age? Live with Dad or on his own?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 10:53:04 AM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    What do we know about Oduber's son? Age? Live with Dad or on his own?

    I believe Oduber has more than one son.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 11:15:04 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Diario editorial 4/16/07 translated by Jossy from Easy's blog (thanks Easy):

    A TRAITOR AND HIS ANTI-ARUBAN GOVERNMENT (2)


    The truth can hurt when it’s exposed without circumlocution! What could have led the mediocrity of the MEP party to lose their heads in such an ugly manner? Could it be the bribery of 1 million guilders? Is that what made them try to look for any distraction from this most shameful anti-Aruban act known in our history? Is it because Nel Oduber is searching for a way out of the atom-bomb that the Namdar offer exploded in his face, and that has converted Neldar into another victim that “can be bought and sold?"

    Gentlemen, go ahead with your attempts to distract the attention from the offered bribery of the most shameful 1 million guilders that exists, and the delivery afterwards of our port to the same foreign group that put that money under the table! Is this or isn’t this the greatest demonstration of anti-Arubanism known until now? Must the Aruban continue on the path of the cross to get his rights, while the foreigners with money can just wave a few bills in their faces to at once get the permits or properties they want? Just consider all the cases that the most anti-Aruban government has lost in court so far! Two great doctors, real Arubans, Lacle and Posner, had to take the path of the cross to get their rights, and even so, are being politically persecuted until this day! Is this, or isn’t this one more demonstration of the most pathetic anti-Arubanism that exists?

    Then Henny Eman and Otmar Oduber, another two Arubans with a long history of political persecution coming from the same Government and members of the MEP party, hungry for vengeance, moved by hate and rancor. They too had to suffer years of political persecution, to finally obtain in Court for the truth to conquer the lies, the slanders, the ridiculous accusations, thrown at them by a Government that has characterized itself as mediocre and totally anti-Aruban!

    And we could go on and on to fill this whole paper with the long list of politically persecuted Arubans, just because they think different and want the good of their people and their island. To expose the truth in a newspaper, on the radio or on television, has become for the anti-Arubans in power the cause for unbelievable hysterics, a drowning in a glass of water, and an attempt to hide the bribery offer of 1 million guilders with shouts coming from the handful of mediocrities at their disposal. Mister Neldar can turn and turn, trying to find any motive that can help him extract himself, but the 1 million guilders hang over his head like the accusation of a judge.

    The day I said that Nel Oduber’s government is anti American too, I came with the proofs to demonstrate it, but I left out a couple very painful for Nel, but since he again lost control over his tongue, here are more proofs: Natalee Holloway (American) and the American girl that his son mistreated and then wanted to rape in his own home! The father, a man from Panama, sent me all the proofs, including clinical reports of physical abuse, and I didn’t publish them for discretion’s sake and for consideration of a person that does not deserve it.

    What did Nel’s government do in the case of Natalee? Hide their heads in a hole like ostriches so as not to see the truth of what was happening, try to fire Jan and Karin because they did not belong to the group of political yes-men of his government; put the interest for American tourism money above the value of a human life; try to throw the blame on the family of the girl that disappeared, instead of going all-out against the three suspects who are responsible for the bad name Aruba got in other countries, and rightly so because those in power did not lift one finger to defend the victim, but went all out behind the curtain to make the family responsible for the negative image Aruba got, and not against the three suspects in whose company the girl disappeared. She too is an American!

    Then his unbelievably stupid anti-American statements; the case of his own son who tried to rape an American girl in his own home! Now there is another American arrested because he pulled a gun against a person that attacked his wife, then committed destruction against her property. A government that has characterized itself as an Anti-American one with unquestionable concrete proofs.

    But, the worst is that this government is principally an Anti-Aruban one that obliges the sons of this island that do not belong to the privileged few of the MEP, to go through a truly torturous process to find their rights! For the foreigner with money? Everything! All they have to do is…let everyone complete the sentence for himself or herself, considering the bribery offer. And for the poor foreigners who come to Aruba with his or her work specialization, another road of the cross! A merciless persecution; an extraction of the little money that they have or can borrow, to obtain the papers for a permit that often never comes! Another inhuman persecution of those that did not come to commit acts against the law (like those that many of the delinquents around Nel did commit, some with judge’s sentences hanging over their heads!), but who came to Aruba to look for a better life and to contribute to our labor market with their talents and know-hows!

    Nel Oduber has become a synonym for political persecution, for implacable hatred, for “can be bought and sold”, of 1 million guilders offered to a traitor willing to deliver our port in the hands of foreigners! This is a handing-over of the worst kind, of a dictatorial attitude never before seen on an island that always held its impeccable democracy in front of the eyes of the world for it to understand that in Aruba the empire of the Law is in command. We can no longer say that! Now our island has become, in the hands of Nel Oduber and his anti Aruban and anti-American government, an island of the abuse of power, of nepotism, of favors to the small group of privileged MEP fanatics, and political persecution against the rest of the population that do not subject themselves to his amens!



    Everyone that has ever doubted what is going on in Aruba should read this and read it carefully.  The answer to why the Sloots received a pass is in this article.  We should also note the exception of Van der Straaten and Janssen in involvement.  Jossy has always maintained that they had their hands tied.  He must know things I don't for I find it hard to clear van der Straaten and Janssen as of yet. Maybe they were out numbered as in the case of the strife between Janssen and her boss.  Jossy has maintained that van der Straaten is one of the good guys.  However that does not release him in complicity of a cover up.  It does help explain his removal and sudden return amid the chaos that was taking place in Aruba.  The power struggle is enormous there and it is any wonder that we know anything about what has happened.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 11:42:01 AM
    NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

    Aruba: Blue Skies, White Sandy Beaches and Human Traffickers … Oh My


    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/aruba-blue-skies-white-sandy-beaches-and-human-traffickers-oh-my/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 11:50:01 AM
    Hi monkeys. It's Lean Cuisine time here where I am.

    I've had a couple of emails from Easy this morning that I wanted to share. First of all, regarding the attempted rape by Oduber's son, Easy thinks this was of someone Oduber Jr. had been living with one, not a casual tourist. When the woman attempted to break up with him, young Oduber attempted to rape her. Easy said he'll look back through his information when he gets a chance in order to confirm that.

    Also, Easy wanted me to ask if anyone knows of someone in Utrecht, Netherlands who might be an Aruban native. He has a strange comment on his blog that he's trying to figure out.

    TY


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 16, 2007, 11:53:25 AM
    TY KLASS for bringing over the translation......
    Jossy rocked a few peoples world today,
    ya think
    ???


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 16, 2007, 11:57:30 AM
    FOM I agree, he did and how did Oduber and the MEP get re-elected ? the island is small enough internally to make me wonder how he twists arms or does he just fool the voters who aren't in power and therefore know little?

    BT, I was at easy's blog last night but didn't notice a strange comment - I appreciate him sharing the info on Oduber Jr too. I hope Jossy can find a way to publish the evidence.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 11:58:27 AM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    FOM I agree, he did and how did Oduber and the MEP get re-elected ? the island is small enough internally to make me wonder how he twists arms or does he just fool the voters who aren't in power and therefore know little?

    BT, I was at easy's blog last night but didn't notice a strange comment - I appreciate him sharing the info on Oduber Jr too. I hope Jossy can find a way to publish the evidence.


    None - I think the comment was one that just came in. He always reads them before he posts them, and I don't think he's posted the "strange" one yet.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 16, 2007, 12:02:57 PM
    ok BT I wasn't questioning him having such a comment at all, I hope he can make some sense of it.

    what flavor lean cuisine? I just had a cookie, my bad?  :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 12:04:42 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    ok BT I wasn't questioning him having such a comment at all, I hope he can make some sense of it.

    what flavor lean cuisine? I just had a cookie, my bad?  :oops:


    Pepperoni pizza - it actually wasn't too bad for something that's supposed to be relatively healthy.  :lol:  (And I wish I'd had one of those cookies to go with it.  :oops: )


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 16, 2007, 12:06:20 PM
    I like pepperoni and I should eat more lean cuisines, it was a good cookie and I promise to share next time !


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:06:27 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Hi monkeys. It's Lean Cuisine time here where I am.

    I've had a couple of emails from Easy this morning that I wanted to share. First of all, regarding the attempted rape by Oduber's son, Easy thinks this was of someone Oduber Jr. had been living with one, not a casual tourist. When the woman attempted to break up with him, young Oduber attempted to rape her. Easy said he'll look back through his information when he gets a chance in order to confirm that.

    Also, Easy wanted me to ask if anyone knows of someone in Utrecht, Netherlands who might be an Aruban native. He has a strange comment on his blog that he's trying to figure out.
    TY


    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/21/world/main1638431.shtml

    Guido Wever maybe?

    (snipped)
    Suspect In Holloway Case Released

    AMSTERDAM, Netherlands, May 23, 2006
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (CBS/AP) A man arrested in the disappearance of an American teenager on the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba was released from custody Tuesday, a court official said.

    The release of the suspect, who CBS News has reported is Guido Wever, means he will not be transferred to Aruba, said the court official, Martine de Bruijn. His lawyer, Gerard Sprong, told Dutch television there was not enough evidence to hold his client.

    A spokesman for the Dutch national prosecutor's office declined to comment, saying the case was in the hands of the Aruban public prosecutor.

    The suspect was arrested last Wednesday in the town of Utrecht. He was a croupier at the casino in the Holiday Inn hotel where American Natalee Holloway was staying when she disappeared a year ago during a high school graduation trip to Aruba.
    (snipped)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 12:07:20 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    I like pepperoni and I should eat more lean cuisines, it was a good cookie and I promise to share next time !


    The cookie you share will be calorie free won't it?  :D

    I'm STILL trying to lose those same pounds I've been trying to lose for a year.  :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 12:09:41 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Hi monkeys. It's Lean Cuisine time here where I am.

    I've had a couple of emails from Easy this morning that I wanted to share. First of all, regarding the attempted rape by Oduber's son, Easy thinks this was of someone Oduber Jr. had been living with one, not a casual tourist. When the woman attempted to break up with him, young Oduber attempted to rape her. Easy said he'll look back through his information when he gets a chance in order to confirm that.

    Also, Easy wanted me to ask if anyone knows of someone in Utrecht, Netherlands who might be an Aruban native. He has a strange comment on his blog that he's trying to figure out.
    TY


    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/05/21/world/main1638431.shtml

    Guido Wever maybe?

    (snipped)
    Suspect In Holloway Case Released

    AMSTERDAM, Netherlands, May 23, 2006
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (CBS/AP) A man arrested in the disappearance of an American teenager on the Dutch Caribbean island of Aruba was released from custody Tuesday, a court official said.

    The release of the suspect, who CBS News has reported is Guido Wever, means he will not be transferred to Aruba, said the court official, Martine de Bruijn. His lawyer, Gerard Sprong, told Dutch television there was not enough evidence to hold his client.

    A spokesman for the Dutch national prosecutor's office declined to comment, saying the case was in the hands of the Aruban public prosecutor.

    The suspect was arrested last Wednesday in the town of Utrecht. He was a croupier at the casino in the Holiday Inn hotel where American Natalee Holloway was staying when she disappeared a year ago during a high school graduation trip to Aruba.
    (snipped)


    TY Klaas. I'll Easy know that Guido might be a possibility.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:10:38 PM
    BTgirl - or his attorney  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 16, 2007, 12:10:45 PM
    gosh Klaas is there anything you don't know? guido, gosh I never would have remembered that !

    BT I should find some sugar & fat free recipes but fear I've been lazy about that. I saw a bakery owner on Martha that has all fat/sugar free cakes and cupcakes and muffins and brownies so obviously there is a market for it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 12:13:24 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    gosh Klaas is there anything you don't know? guido, gosh I never would have remembered that !

    BT I should find some sugar & fat free recipes but fear I've been lazy about that. I saw a bakery owner on Martha that has all fat/sugar free cakes and cupcakes and muffins and brownies so obviously there is a market for it.


    Fat-free and sugar-free would be healthy, but not necessarily good. :?

    Stick to the yummy stuff that gives us all a reason to get up in the morning.  :wink:

    The Lean Cuisine break is over for me. Gotta get back to emplyee evaluations.  :(  Talk to you later.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 12:16:30 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"


    Everyone that has ever doubted what is going on in Aruba should read this and read it carefully.  The answer to why the Sloots received a pass is in this article.  We should also note the exception of Van der Straaten and Janssen in involvement.  Jossy has always maintained that they had their hands tied.  He must know things I don't for I find it hard to clear van der Straaten and Janssen as of yet. Maybe they were out numbered as in the case of the strife between Janssen and her boss.  Jossy has maintained that van der Straaten is one of the good guys.  However that does not release him in complicity of a cover up.  It does help explain his removal and sudden return amid the chaos that was taking place in Aruba.  The power struggle is enormous there and it is any wonder that we know anything about what has happened.



    Right on Lalas, here's where the expanded government cover-up comes in. Oduber's power buds including AHATA, Strategic Task Force, Renfro's ArubaToday gang, American mercenaries Pauley, Cohen and Dilella. All conspired to blame the victim to keep Paulus Van Der Sloot from dropping a dime on them and their MEP cronies. Incredible article by Jossy.


    What did Nel’s government do in the case of Natalee? Hide their heads in a hole like ostriches so as not to see the truth of what was happening, try to fire Jan and Karin because they did not belong to the group of political yes-men of his government; put the interest for American tourism money above the value of a human life; try to throw the blame on the family of the girl that disappeared, instead of going all-out against the three suspects who are responsible for the bad name Aruba got in other countries, and rightly so because those in power did not lift one finger to defend the victim, but went all out behind the curtain to make the family responsible for the negative image Aruba got, and not against the three suspects in whose company the girl disappeared. She too is an American!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 12:21:02 PM
    O/T - AT LEAST 1 DEAD, 17 WOUNDED IN TWO SHOOTINGS ON VIRGINIA TECH CAMPUS; 1 SUSPECT IN CUSTODY

    **Watch FOX News Channel or go to http://foxnews.com for more


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 12:22:32 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    BTgirl - or his attorney  :shock:

    Oh yes his attorney and everyone must be afraid of the idiot because he will come after us.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 12:28:59 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    O/T - AT LEAST 1 DEAD, 17 WOUNDED IN TWO SHOOTINGS ON VIRGINIA TECH CAMPUS; 1 SUSPECT IN CUSTODY

    **Watch FOX News Channel or go to http://foxnews.com for more


    They are saying now 20 dead  :cry:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 12:35:21 PM
    Hiya Monkeys

    Had read back & saw where a "salad" was discussed last night. Searched & this is what I found:

    http://tinyurl.com/2ukpla

    Sunday, October 16, 2005
    This was sent to me in an email
    WHERE IS NATALEE HOLLOWAY?

    The original lie was that Natalee was dropped off at the Holiday Inn and approached by two security guards, a description of whom was given in enough detail that two such men were quickly identified and arrested. Her body was hidden where the original lie says it is, period: The high rise hotel strip area, near Marriott and Holiday Inn. The most harmless scenario for the three boys involved was to say that they quickly dispatched Natalee back to her hotel since it was observed that she may have been tipsy at the time she was seen driving off with them. Furthermore, it has been said that Natalee did return to her hotel room briefly to retrieve something and left again and so, in the event that someone may have seen Kalpoe's car in the vicinity of the Holiday Inn subsequent to leaving Carlos and Charlie's while she got something from her room, they had to cover for the car potentially being seen near the Holiday Inn. Therefore, the story was concocted BEFORE the hiding location near Holiday Inn or Mariott was chosen, and her body was placed where it was in order to support the original lie.

    2001 Aruba trip report describing an "Old Hotel's" remnants Near the Marriott & Holiday Inn "we walked past Marriott to where an old hotel once stood and old craft stalls were. This area also had windsurfing booths set up for young and old.. Pretty trashy, no luck but best area for finding many seashells."

    The story-fabricators also selected two security guards known as regularly patrolling in the vicinity of said hiding place as the scapegoats. The body-hiding consultant being familiar with a hiding place close to Natalee's hotel, the Holiday Inn. In other words, the body-hiding consultant has been to this hiding place before, it was not a quick, random choice or created for the occasion. Ergo, her body will be found within the security guards' customary patrol area. (This does not mean that the body-hiding consultant has hidden other bodies but he may know of the existence of other bodies in the selected hiding place).

    Why were the guards singled out and not "a stranger" or nobody? Why bring a potential perpetrator into the alibi at all? This tells you that Joran and the Kalpoes do know that something happened to Natalee and it tells you that they all concocted a story that might fly in the event that the hiding place in *THE GUARDS CUSTOMARY PATROL AREA* is found with Natalee inside. It also tells you that Steve Croes was the one who suggested the body-hiding place close to where his boat is usually anchored. So Croes knows the Kalpoes better than he says since they brought him into it early on with the initial intention of using his boat and before fine-tuning the original alibi. Croes discouraged that idea, not wanting to participate, suggesting instead the guard story along with a good hiding place near Holiday Inn that he was familiar with since this is his territory. He knows the security guards' patrol routine and could describe them in detail. Croes is the one that the guards need to be mad at. Why did these two, specific individuals come to mind when they were not even on duty that night instead of some random, fabricated individual? Because Croes had to duck those two guards in the past while visiting the hiding location for a different reason and therefore the guards were the first scapegoats to come to mind when fabricating a story about how Natalee will have come to be found in the location of the guards' customary, nightly patrol.

    The location of Natalee is further confirmed and identified by the second, (adjusted), story which is currently that the Kalpoe brothers dropped Natalee and Joran off alone on the beach near the Marriott. This is also a lie. (since they did not allude to the fact that Natalee was now deceased when dropped off there with Joran) The adjustment in the story indicates that her location may be closest to the Marriott in particular. The body of Natalee Holloway was hidden on land in the Palm Beach area of the hotels. To frame the security guards, she could not be put out to sea and potentially disappear forever because the Kalpoe's car might have been observed waiting at the Holiday Inn while Natalee retrieved something from her room. The body was put in a place where it could be found. Her body was meant to be discovered, initially THE BODY WAS HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT. The intention of the original lie was to frame the guards and absolve Joran and two Kalpoes of being the last people to have Natalee in their possession, a better scenario all around since Croes did not want to involve himself or his boat. It is said that Paulus Van Der Sloot made the statement that there is "no case without a body", to the boys. This probably precipitated a call to Croes to use his boat.

    WHAT HAPPENED TO NATALEE HOLLOWAY?

    Joran and the Kalpoe brothers did not deliver Natalee to the beachfront, high rise strip and leave. They only stopped by for Natalee to get something from her room and then they all left together. They may have driven around some and they may even have visited the lighthouse as stated but, ultimately the Kalpoe brothers dropped Natalee and Joran both off at the Van Der Sloot residence where Joran has his own apartment, separate from the main house. The currently held scenario is that Paulus Van Der Sloot had picked Joran up from a McDonalds around 11:00 p.m., took him home and then went about his business, assuming that Joran was home for the night. Did Joran or Paulus bring a "walnut salad" home from McDonalds? That was mentioned.

    It is also currently held that Joran sneaked out off the property at some point and went to Carlos and Charlie's where he met back up with Natalee who was to return home the following morning.

    The Van Der Sloot property has a pool and is gated. My contacts say that Natalee fell off a gate. They also describe a "Victorian Pool", which means that there may be a gazebo there or something Victorian about the surrounding area or the home. This pool, (or the gate) according to them, is supposed to be angular in some way. The angular comment could possibly apply to an angular object near the gate that she fell onto. It's difficult to tell the context of the angular remark. My contacts describe Natalee as "dopy" at the time she fell off the gate so it is not to say that going to a boy's home in the middle of the night is something that she would ordinarily do. So the Kalpoe brothers dropped Joran and Natalee back at Joran's house and this gate may have been closed and locked. It could be that the gate was not locked, but simply that opening it would have made enough noise to alert Daddy Van Der Sloot to a returning Joran and his company. Natalee either fell off the Van Der Sloot gate sneaking onto the premises with Joran or she had to climb that gate a second time trying to run away from the property.

    I think that she was trying to run away and I think that she may have been "taken advantage of", prior. In any case, she fell from the gate and was injured to an unknown degree. This is when Paulus Van Der Sloot becomes aware and involved and the Kalpoe brothers were called back to the residence to discuss the details of where their car and Joran in particular might have been seen with Natalee after Joran sneaked out and met up with her. This, because she was in bad shape or unconscious by the time Paulus Van Der Sloot comes into play. I believe that the Kalpoe cell phone record of the first call from Joran is going to show that Kalpoe was called from the Van Der Sloot home to come there and help remove Natalee; Not to pick up Joran from the Marriott area as they all now say. This would be why there was blood in the Kalpoe car. If they dropped off a deceased Natalee and Joran near the Marriott to meet the body-hider, they may have changed their story to Marriott beach to explain their car potentially being seen there. That's why the current lie reveals and refines Natalee's location as closer to the Marriott rather than the Holiday Inn. They are all still in cohoots but currently, the Kalpoes are trying to distance themselves from further involvement with Natalee once they dropped her and Joran at Van Der Sloots', since they were not at the scene when she died but they do have to cover for the first call received from Jorran, and they needed to cover for the potential of their car being seen at Marriott beach.

    My contacts continually cite Paulus Van Der Sloot as the killer and they observe Natalee with tape or something was over her mouth. Because of this, I suspect that it was Paulus who suggested application of the tape or a gag while she was unconscious lest she come to and start hollering, and she suffocated or otherwise succumbed to her injuries while Paulus and Joran were trying to figure out what to do about her. I have mention of her being in a garage at a certain point in this, but I don't know if Van Der Sloots have a garage. If so, that's where they had her. I do not think that her death was intentional and it could be that they would have taken her to the hospital, but I do think that a trip to the hospital was not immediately undertaken as they discussed what to do with the circumstances at hand. She was probably at death's door and possibly showing evidence of being "taken advantage of" by the son. The circumstances had the potential to create a career derailing scandal for "The Judge" and she died as options were being weighed.

    WHO HID NATALEE HOLLOWAY?

    I don't think that Van Der Sloot, Sr. has ever had to dispose of a body before but he is in the position to know who would and could. He or Joran knew somebody on the Island in need of exchanging favors and my contacts are naming Lorenzo Van Rijn as that person. I don't know if they are related. Once the cover story was agreed upon between Van Der Sloot, Sr., Joran, the Kalpoes, Croe, and possibly some other confidants who were asked for advice, I believe that Lorenzo was called. He was asked to stash her and Natalee was taken by Joran with the returning Kalpoe(s) in Kalpoe's car to Lorenzo to remove the rest of the party except Joran from culpability for the actual disposal of Natalee. They most likely wanted Kalpoe(s) to take her to Lorenzo alone but they declined to go without Joran and possibly be held liable for the incident. Kalpoe(s) then dropped Natalee and Joran off with Lorenzo and the Kalpoes went home. Joran advises Kalpoe that he will be in contact via the internet later as a means to avoid more cell phone contact. I believe the Kalpoe mother is aware that the boy(s) left the house again.

    After Natalee was hidden, Joran most likely walked home as he currently states. All of their stories are going to have an element of truth in order to cover potentially having been seen. I don't think that Lorenzo would be stupid enough to be seen dropping Joran back at the crime scene and I'm sure that daddy was cowering on the premises in a state of shock while she was being disposed of; hence text message to Deepak from Joran that he got home okay; indicating that the hiding task was completed without incident.

    #1. Guard 1, (freed) #2. Guard 2, (freed) #3. Kalpoe 1,driver, (detained) #4. Kalpoe 2, story substantiator, (detained) #5 Kalpoe Mama, complicity, she knows her boy(s) did not stay home and went back out that night, (unsuspected) #6 Van Der Sloot 1, Romeo, (detained) #7 Van Der Sloot 2, technically the killer, (freed) #8 Croes, body-hiding consultant, (freed) #9 Van Rijn, body-hider, (unsuspected)
    ***
    posted by I_Hate_Stupid_People at 1:19 PM


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 12:36:15 PM
    The campus shooting is terrible.  I just can't believe that many people are dead.  Sends shivers through any parent that has a child in college.  That includes me of course.  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 12:39:20 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    The campus shooting is terrible.  I just can't believe that many people are dead.  Sends shivers through any parent that has a child in college.  That includes me of course.  :shock:


    Foxnews.com is now saying 22 dead.  :cry:

    BLACKSBURG, Va. —  At least 22 are dead after a shooting at Virginia Tech University Monday morning, the campus police chief said.

    Police said there was only one shooter and he is now dead. They are unsure if the shooter was a student.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,266310,00.html


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 12:39:51 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "San"
    O/T - AT LEAST 1 DEAD, 17 WOUNDED IN TWO SHOOTINGS ON VIRGINIA TECH CAMPUS; 1 SUSPECT IN CUSTODY

    **Watch FOX News Channel or go to http://foxnews.com for more



    They are saying now 20 dead  :cry:


    Chief: At least 20 dead in campus shootings
    POSTED: 12:32 p.m. EDT, April 16, 2007

    • NEW: Police chief says at least 20 people are dead, some of them students
    • University reporting that a suspected shooter is in custody, another sought
    • AP: 1 dead, 1 wounded in first reported shooting on Virginia Tech campus
    • Student describes situation as "mayhem"; says 2 students jumped from window



    (CNN) -- The Virginia Tech Police Chief said at least 20 people were killed in twin shootings on the Blacksburg campus Monday morning.

    "Some victims were shot in a classroom," Chief Wendell Flinchum said, adding that the gunman was dead.

    President Charles Steger called the shootings "a tragedy of monumental proportions."

    A hospital spokeswoman told The Associated Press that 17 Virginia Tech students were being treated for gunshot wounds and other injuries. Sharon Honaker at the Carilion New River Valley Medical Center told CNN that four patients had been transported there, one in critical condition.

    One person was killed and others were wounded at multiple locations inside a dormitory about 7:15 a.m., Flinchum said. Two hours later, another shooting at Norris Hall, an engineering building, resulted in multiple casualties, the university reported. (Watch police, ambulances hustle to the scene )

    The first reported shooting occurred at West Ambler Johnston Hall, a co-ed dormitory that houses 895 students. The dormitory, one of the largest residence halls on the 2,600-acre campus, is located near the drill field and stadium.

    Amie Steele, editor-in-chief of the campus newspaper, said one of her reporters at the dormitory reported "mass chaos."

    The reporter said there were "lots of students running around, going crazy, and the police officers were trying to settle everyone down and keep everything under control," according to Steele.

    Kristyn Heiser said she was in class about 9:30 a.m. when she and her classmates saw about six gun-wielding police officers run by a window.

    "We were like, 'What's going on?' Because this definitely is a quaint town where stuff doesn't really happen. It's pretty boring here," said Heiser during a phone interview as she sat on her classroom floor.

    Student Matt Waldron said he did not hear the gunshots because he was listening to music, but he heard police sirens and saw officers hiding behind trees with their guns drawn.

    "They told us to get out of there so we ran across the drill field as quick as we could," he said.

    Waldron described the scene on campus as "mayhem." (Watch a student's recording of police responding to loud bangs )

    "It was kind of scary," he said. "These two kids I guess had panicked and jumped out of the top story window and the one kid broke his ankle and the other girl was not in good shape just lying on the ground."

    Madison Van Duyne said she and her classmates in a media writing class were on "lockdown" in their classrooms. They were huddled in the middle of the classroom, writing stories about the shootings and posting them online.

    The university is updating its 26,000 students through e-mails, and an Internet webcam is broadcasting live pictures of the campus.

    The shootings came three days after a bomb threat Friday forced the cancellation of classes in three buildings, WDBJ in Roanoke reported. Also, the 100,000-square-foot Torgersen Hall was evacuated April 2 after police received a written bomb threat, The Roanoke Times reported.

    After the Monday shootings, students were instructed to stay indoors and away from windows, police at the university said.

    "A gunman is loose on campus. Stay in buildings until further notice. Stay away from all windows," read a warning from the university.

    "Virginia Tech has canceled all classes. Those on campus are asked to remain where they are, lock their doors and stay away from windows. Persons off campus are asked not to come to campus," a statement on the university Web site said.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:40:57 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Anna wrote;
    Quote
    Four sizes is a lot. I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.


    Anna, let me ask, why do you feel that none of them wore that size shoe?



    Brought forward from last night's shoe discussion:


    Because Joran wouldn't want any others involved having forensics taken from their DNA either.  I believe Jossy and my lying eyes more than I do Joran and his ALE buddies.

    No, I don't think they ever seriously looked for any shoe, either.  If they wouldn't look for Natalee any better than they did and blocked others from looking, what are the chances that they looked seriously for the non-existent shoe?

    JMO but do read the article at GetaGrip's website for the Dutch Interrogator measuring Joran's foot inside the 10.5.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 12:42:56 PM
    Do we have any monkeys with students there?  Does anyone know?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:45:00 PM
    Drudge Reporting 21 dead, 21 injured.  That is a huge number!  I am praying it is wrong and many of the injured were mistakenly counted among the dead.

    Anyone hear anything as to motive?

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 12:47:42 PM
    BLACKSBURG, Va. (AP) - A gunman opened fire in a dorm and classroom at Virginia Tech on Monday, killing 21 people and wounding another 21 before he was killed, police said.
    On the Web site, Tech reported the shootings at opposite sides of the 2,600-acre campus at West Ambler Johnston, a co-ed residence hall that houses 895 people, and said there were "multiple victims" at Norris Hall, an engineering building.

    All entrances to the campus were closed and classes canceled through Tuesday.

    "There's just a lot of commotion. It's hard to tell exactly what's going on," said student Jason Anthony Smith, 19, who lives in the dorm where shooting took place.

    Aimee Kanode, a freshman from Martinsville, said the shooting happened on the 4th floor of West Ambler Johnston dormitory, one floor above her room. Kanode's resident assistant knocked on her door about 8 a.m. to notify students to stay put.

    "They had us under lockdown," Kanode said. "They temporarily lifted the lockdown, the gunman shot again."

    "We're all locked in our dorms surfing the Internet trying to figure out what's going on," Kanode said.

    Madison Van Duyne, a student who was interviewed by telephone on CNN, said, "We are all in lockdown. Most of the students are sitting on the floors away from the windows just trying to be as safe as possible."

    It was second time in less than a year that the campus was closed because of a shooting.

    In August 2006, the opening day of classes was canceled and the campus closed when an escaped jail inmate allegedly killed a hospital guard off campus and fled to the Tech area. A sheriff's deputy involved in the manhunt was killed on a trail just off campus.

    The accused gunman, William Morva, faces capital murder charges.



    Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 12:48:07 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Anna wrote;
    Quote
    Four sizes is a lot. I sort of doubt any of them wore a Size 14 and maybe Joran felt safe giving that size as he was pretty sure no one would find a shoe that large just lying around somewhere.


    Anna, let me ask, why do you feel that none of them wore that size shoe?



    Brought forward from last night's shoe discussion:


    Because Joran wouldn't want any others involved having forensics taken from their DNA either.  I believe Jossy and my lying eyes more than I do Joran and his ALE buddies.

    No, I don't think they ever seriously looked for any shoe, either.  If they wouldn't look for Natalee any better than they did and blocked others from looking, what are the chances that they looked seriously for the non-existent shoe?

    JMO but do read the article at GetaGrip's website for the Dutch Interrogator measuring Joran's foot inside the 10.5.

    .


    I will agree at this time that Joran wears a size 10.5 shoe.  You are right in saying they didn't look for any shoes.  It was all a farce.  Protect tourism at any cost.  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Red on April 16, 2007, 12:50:04 PM
    http://collegemedia.com/

    Monday, April 16th 2007 12:23AM
    Virginia Tech police have confirmed 22 fatalities resulting from the campus shootings today. The gunman has also been confirmed dead.

    Three people were escorted out of Norris Hall by police. The three were handcuffed, separated, questioned, unhandcuffed and then canine teams were sent into Norris Hall said junior computer engineer Nick Saunders who watched the events unfold from the the second floor of Randolph Hall.

    According to the university, classes have been cancelled for Tuesday, April 17.

    Monday, April 16th 2007 11:57AM
    Three people were escorted out of Norris Hall in handcuffs by police. The three were then unhandcuffed and canine teams were sent into Norris Hall.

    Following story and updates at:
    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/one-dead-in-school-shooting-at-virginia-tech-suspect-in-custody/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 16, 2007, 12:51:13 PM
    Anna-

    there is some word coming out now that a professor was shot first and that there were two bomb threats made there last week, all directed toward engineering education buildings? Son and I spent a weekend there during recruiting and I cannot tell you how idyllic that campus is and how lovely the people are. This is beyond tragic.......now word is the suspect was looking for his girlfriend and went into Norris Hall lining up people and shooting them execution style?

    good lord, it's not been confirmed but this is so so horrible....


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:03:41 PM
    Radio news just called it worst school shooting in U.S. History.

     :cry:  :(  :cry:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 01:06:09 PM
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    Anna-

    there is some word coming out now that a professor was shot first and that there were two bomb threats made there last week, all directed toward engineering education buildings? Son and I spent a weekend there during recruiting and I cannot tell you how idyllic that campus is and how lovely the people are. This is beyond tragic.......now word is the suspect was looking for his girlfriend and went into Norris Hall lining up people and shooting them execution style?

    good lord, it's not been confirmed but this is so so horrible....

    This guy apparently shot the guy who checks IDs before you can go to other floors.  I forgot the name they used.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:08:00 PM
    This is so horrible I can't even wrap my mind around it!

    I used to be a nervous wreck because my son had to walk by the Birmingham abortion clinic that Eric Rudolph blew up.  

    Just can't imagine this large a massacre of students of all things.

    National tragedy, a loss of this magnitude.  I am sure we are all in shock at this huge loss.  I just don't have words to express the horror of it.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 01:09:38 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    Anna-

    there is some word coming out now that a professor was shot first and that there were two bomb threats made there last week, all directed toward engineering education buildings? Son and I spent a weekend there during recruiting and I cannot tell you how idyllic that campus is and how lovely the people are. This is beyond tragic.......now word is the suspect was looking for his girlfriend and went into Norris Hall lining up people and shooting them execution style?

    good lord, it's not been confirmed but this is so so horrible....

    This guy apparently shot the guy who checks IDs before you can go to other floors.  I forgot the name they used.


    R.A??  Residence Admin, or something like that?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 01:12:06 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Radio news just called it worst school shooting in U.S. History.

     :cry:  :(  :cry:


    Yes, it's horrible.  Nothing is truly safe, anymore.  DH and I were just talking about it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 01:13:44 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "nonesuche"
    Anna-

    there is some word coming out now that a professor was shot first and that there were two bomb threats made there last week, all directed toward engineering education buildings? Son and I spent a weekend there during recruiting and I cannot tell you how idyllic that campus is and how lovely the people are. This is beyond tragic.......now word is the suspect was looking for his girlfriend and went into Norris Hall lining up people and shooting them execution style?

    good lord, it's not been confirmed but this is so so horrible....

    This guy apparently shot the guy who checks IDs before you can go to other floors.  I forgot the name they used.


    R.A??  Residence Admin, or something like that?

    Yes that's it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:20:21 PM
    Hi CP405!  I see you lurking.  :smt039


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 01:38:50 PM
    ABC News

    Apr. 16, 2007— At least 29 people are dead in what may be the biggest mass killing on a college campus in American history — and the death toll may rise.

    Police at Virginia Tech, in Blaksburg, Va., said that the shootings happened at a dormitory and a classroom on opposite sides of the university campus.

    Virginia Tech Police Chief Wendell Flinchum said that one person was killed in the first shooting, which occurred just after 7 a.m. at West Ambler Johnston Hall, a large dormitory. Flinchum said that at least 20 more people were killed at Norris Hall, an academic building.

    The gunman, whose identity has not been released, is among the dead. Flinchum wouldn't say whether the shooter had killed himself.

    ABC News has confirmed that there were two separate bomb threats last week at Virginia Tech that targeted engineering buildings. The first was directed at Torgersen Hall, while the second was directed at multiple engineering buildings. Students and staff were evacuated, and the university had offered a $5,000 reward for information into the threats.

    Two local hospitals have reported treating 21 people, though it is unclear how many of those may have died.

    University president Charles Steger said that police have not officially tied together the two shootings.

    Steger described today's events as an incident of "tragic proportions" and said, "the university is shocked and horrified that this would befall us."

    The campus is closed today and classed are canceled today and tomorrow. Families seeking to reunite with their children have been directed by the university to the Inn at Virginia Tech.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 16, 2007, 01:40:50 PM
    This shooting at Virginia Tech is just terrible.  I wonder how long before we get crazies doing copy cat shootings at another University?  This is just so scarey!  I have a son at college and it just strikes fear in my heart that something like this happens.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:46:08 PM
    I'm reading that Oduber's son who was accused of attempted rape is:

    Nelson "Chito" Oduber


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:48:28 PM
    Quote from: "MuffyBee"
    This shooting at Virginia Tech is just terrible.  I wonder how long before we get crazies doing copy cat shootings at another University?  This is just so scarey!  I have a son at college and it just strikes fear in my heart that something like this happens.


    I am in your shoes as well as many other monkeys here.  I just don't want to think about it, but I have to.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 01:49:35 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I'm reading that Oduber's son who was accused of attempted rape is:

    Nelson "Chito" Oduber


    Do we have an age...I know you are trying to find it...I can hear the wheels turning all the way from California.  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 16, 2007, 01:53:40 PM
    They are now saying 32 killed at Virginia Tech and 21 wounded.  (fox)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 01:57:35 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I'm reading that Oduber's son who was accused of attempted rape is:

    Nelson "Chito" Oduber


    Do we have an age...I know you are trying to find it...I can hear the wheels turning all the way from California.  :lol:

    I have the info somewhere on him, will check.  May take a bit, I'm trying to work too.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 16, 2007, 02:06:46 PM
    This is just the strangest thing at Va Tech, as there was a 2-hour difference from the first spate of shootings to the next, or did I hear something wrong?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 02:09:57 PM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    This is just the strangest thing at Va Tech, as there was a 2-hour difference from the first spate of shootings to the next, or did I hear something wrong?

    I heard the same thing but I still think there's alot of confusion.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 02:28:39 PM
    Also heard maybe the shooter just blended in between the two shootings.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: nonesuche on April 16, 2007, 02:36:14 PM
    the two buildings are maybe 10 minutes apart on foot, Norris Hall if I'm not mistaken is the largest and one of the newest buildings on campus or was when we visited - very distinctive architecture and a flagship for the engineering program

    son has five high school classmates there and I just cannot imagine the horror those students, faculty & staff and parents have endured today


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 02:38:07 PM
    Been searching for Kock's statement about K2 & Joran leaving CnC's & making another stop. This is what I found. Seems I remember it being said it was a bar not a restaurant??

    http://tinyurl.com/2g2yrw

    <snip>

    Satish Kalpoe's attorney, David Kock, said his client told him that van der Sloot asked the Kalpoe brothers to pick him up Sunday night so he could meet up with Holloway and her classmates at Carlos'n Charlie's, a popular watering hole in the capital, Oranjestad.

    They said they left the bar around 1:30 a.m. with van der Sloot and an intoxicated Holloway in the back seat, then stopped briefly at another restaurant about a block away before heading out of town, Kock said.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 02:42:54 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Been searching for Kock's statement about K2 & Joran leaving CnC's & making another stop. This is what I found. Seems I remember it being said it was a bar not a restaurant??

    http://tinyurl.com/2g2yrw

    <snip>

    Satish Kalpoe's attorney, David Kock, said his client told him that van der Sloot asked the Kalpoe brothers to pick him up Sunday night so he could meet up with Holloway and her classmates at Carlos'n Charlie's, a popular watering hole in the capital, Oranjestad.

    They said they left the bar around 1:30 a.m. with van der Sloot and an intoxicated Holloway in the back seat, then stopped briefly at another restaurant about a block away before heading out of town, Kock said.


    Nice find!! I remember in the TV interview Kock gave a reason why they stopped..I only saw it once so I forgot what he said..I beleave it was to see if a friend was working that night or they were gonna have more drink's but the bar was closing..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 02:49:24 PM
    Hiya *******..Welcome to the cage!!

    Them stopping after leaving CnC's makes me wonder where Freddy was working??


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 02:56:29 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Hiya *******..Welcome to the cage!!

    Them stopping after leaving CnC's makes me wonder where Freddy was working??


    Hi!! Thanks for the welcome..

    I wonder where he was working as well..That would make sense if they stopped at his place of work as we know he was around that night as well.

    I searched high and low for the kock interview..Its not out there!! I'm leaning on it was a greta interview in his office as he went through the events after C&C..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 02:57:21 PM
    Trying to speed read ...

    yapperz - thanks for the post mentioning the "walnut salad" and is that something McDonald's makes? (Or even Waldorf salad, for that matter, considering that may be a mistake - walnut/waldorf.) It's something msmarple makes when she can't eat the apples fast enough ...

    Waiting for klaas to complete her report on Nelson Chito Oduber ...  :lol:  If it was a boyfriend/girlfriend breakup, not quite as suggestive of the "take the girls home" scenario I pounced on.

    Virginia Tech - What on earth? In one story I read, they don't think the dorm shootings and the classroom shootings are related ?? And there was a bomb threat earlier this month??


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 03:00:54 PM
    Yapperz,
    Good find on the Waldorf Salad.

    Apparently, McDonalds offered an apple/walnut salad at that time and it was reported that Paulus bought one.  Also some commentary on a receipt with time stamp being found, I thought, just from memory, it was found in one of their cars.

    But the source for this is highly questionable as RWV had what Dan deemed as trolls who posted all kinds of things like this.  "Blacklabel wants a tomato sandwich!"  Just nonsensical things like that.  Often at the end of the day or before archiving a thread, he would delete all of them from those whom he deemed as trolls.  And that could be just about anybody on any given day.

    Later this was picked up by some of the prophesy sites and I think even the Coffee Pot Ghost made mention of the salad.

    I have no way of knowing one way or the other if there was ever a walnut salad involved in any way.  Just another of those thousands of small details mentioned in passing by parties unknown.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 03:09:52 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Yapperz,
    Good find on the Waldorf Salad.

    Apparently, McDonalds offered an apple/walnut salad at that time and it was reported that Paulus bought one.  Also some commentary on a receipt with time stamp being found, I thought, just from memory, it was found in one of their cars.

    But the source for this is highly questionable as RWV had what Dan deemed as trolls who posted all kinds of things like this.  "Blacklabel wants a tomato sandwich!"  Just nonsensical things like that.  Often at the end of the day or before archiving a thread, he would delete all of them from those whom he deemed as trolls.  And that could be just about anybody on any given day.

    Later this was picked up by some of the prophesy sites and I think even the Coffee Pot Ghost made mention of the salad.

    I have no way of knowing one way or the other if there was ever a walnut salad involved in any way.  Just another of those thousands of small details mentioned in passing by parties unknown.

    .


    Was this salad picked up at the 11PM time or the 4 AM time? Or maybe even earlier?  I guess we don't know that answer.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Kimmy53 on April 16, 2007, 03:17:35 PM
    OMG has the world gone crazy or what?  My heart is broken for those involved in the shooting in VA.  Such madness!  

    Also wanted to say HI!!!!!!! to ******* - welcome to the cage.  I hope you will like it here.  I venture out to the FP once in a while and have seen your posts.   Glad to have you here.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 03:22:45 PM
    There also was some discussion as to when Joran emailed RWV about removing his pic.
    I found this:

    http://tinyurl.com/2brzqo

    Thursday, June 09, 2005
    Natalee Holloway Suspect May Have Contacted Blogger Hours Before Arrest
    UPDATE: A reader suggested pinging the IP associated with the emails. I am afraid I am not a techie but I did manage to do this. The emails originated at SLBH/SETAR ARUBA SPRINTLINK.

     The reader provided image at right is said to picture, left to right Satish K, Joran Van Der Sloot, and Deepak K the three men arrested today in the Natalee Holloway disapearance.

    The Dutch suspect, Joran Andreas Petrus Van Der Sloot, a student at Aruba International School, came out of his home in the upper-class neighbourhood of Oranjestad on Thursday with his head covered in a blue-and-green towel. Police identified the Surinamese brothers only as Satish and Deepak K.

    The face of Van Der Sloot is blurred in keeping with a commitment made to an emailer from last night who claimed to be Joran Van Der Sloot. Prior to altering the image, it was indeed Van Der Sloot as I have come to see him through his now down tickle.com website.

    I'm well aware that today's age of Internet communication allows for anyone to pretend to be whomever they wish through anonymous emails; however, if I had reason to suspect it was not Joran who emailed, I would not make this report. But, in all candor, I have no way of absolutely confirming the identity of the emailer.

    As was once displayed here, this blogged contained an image of Joran Van Der Sloot after the image seemed to be taken down from its original location at Current Affair. While I am sure the image appears elsewhere, the emailer claiming to be Van Der Sloot politely requested that the image be taken down out of respect for his privacy stating it was one of the few remaining he could find, that he was only 17 and that he didn't want to see his face plastered all over CNN. He also stated that he hoped to one day travel to the US to continue his education, presumably at the college level.

    My initial response was to request verification of his identity, however without waiting to hear back I wrote the individual again after dropping the image and stated it was a sign of good faith and asked if he could communicate with me. I also said that I felt I understood some aspects of his position, that there is much he could not and should not say, but felt that at the same time there may be some things he could and should perhaps say given all the reports of his involvement. I was surprised when the emailer responded and was fully prepared for it to be a total sham - which admittedly, it could still be.

    He stated that he had created a Hotmail account specifically for requesting the image be taken down, that he would not mind communicating if he could but that he would not be able to do so without first talking to his Father.

    Late last night I wrote back and suggested that anything he did choose to share should first be reviewed by his Father, purportedly a Judge, and also an attorney.  My email went out just a few hours prior to the six AM arrest of the three suspects and I have not heard back from the account since.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 03:23:26 PM
    Quote from: "Kimmy53"
    OMG has the world gone crazy or what?  My heart is broken for those involved in the shooting in VA.  Such madness!  

    Also wanted to say HI!!!!!!! to ******* - welcome to the cage.  I hope you will like it here.  I venture out to the FP once in a while and have seen your posts.   Glad to have you here.


    On days such as this I wonder.  Hi Kimmy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 03:28:21 PM
    Another old post from RWV (same link)

    Van der lsoot says to the security guard that was jailed “that they left him at his house with natalee still in the car he exchanged emails with her and they took off (leaving JOran at home). The story is somethign that the 3 boys made up at home by the pool” adn now other kids also said that on monday Joran walked out into the woods by the school and stayed a while…maybe that was the 2 boys teling him about the “story”to tell?? and also here on aruba it is known that the cousins of the 2 Kalpoe boys are “dangerous” people who knows if they have soemthign to do with this?? They own a car rental here and they say they moved to aruba because they were bad in suriname and apparently they are moving form aruba to the US now
    Posted by: AMINA | Monday, June 13, 2005 at 01:20 PM


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 03:36:32 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/RouteSatalite17-1.jpg)


    Look's like freddy has worked at Champions Bar at the Marriott Hotel. Not sure if he worked there on that night though. Wherever they stopped it was some place close. http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=203

    Over and Over I see the Marriott pop up..Makes me wonder about the "Fransisco" witness who said he helped bury NH. He's the guy who was locked up in a mental hospital. You know the story..With the white pick up and Natalee wrapped in a tarp. I think he was friends of a mariott employee. I know Art Woods said he has interviewed him twice and his friends said he wasnt crazy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 03:36:54 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Another old post from RWV (same link)

    Van der lsoot says to the security guard that was jailed “that they left him at his house with natalee still in the car he exchanged emails with her and they took off (leaving JOran at home). The story is somethign that the 3 boys made up at home by the pool” adn now other kids also said that on monday Joran walked out into the woods by the school and stayed a while…maybe that was the 2 boys teling him about the “story”to tell?? and also here on aruba it is known that the cousins of the 2 Kalpoe boys are “dangerous” people who knows if they have soemthign to do with this?? They own a car rental here and they say they moved to aruba because they were bad in suriname and apparently they are moving form aruba to the US now
    Posted by: AMINA | Monday, June 13, 2005 at 01:20 PM


    So who is "dangerous"  the Kalpoes or their cousins?  I can't quite understand that statement.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: igsigs on April 16, 2007, 03:45:36 PM
    Per MF Rudy Croes said that the 10 Dutch investigators came to Aruba for both the Nadmar bribery investigation and the NH case (a last intent before closing the case).


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 03:46:34 PM
    Is Choose a Name near Champions?  I forget after all this time?  The fact that Deepak says they drove by the bar tells me they stopped somewhere.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 03:46:52 PM
    Lala's from what I understand from the post it is the Kalpoe cousins who are bad news


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Red on April 16, 2007, 03:53:39 PM
    Front page post:

    Diario Editorial: A TRAITOR AND HIS ANTI-ARUBAN GOVERNMENT … Anti-American too

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/diario-editorial-a-traitor-and-his-anti-aruban-government-anti-american-too/

    Well if Oduber and MEP were upset with Jossy and his freedom of speech before, wait until they read his editorial.

    Then his unbelievably stupid anti-American statements; the case of his own son who tried to rape an American girl in his own home! Hmm

    Jossy, don’t beat around the bush. Tell us how you really feel? Of course we know he will. It is just too bad so many other Arubans cannot see the obvious. Hiding one’s head in the sand and turning your back on injustice is hardley an act of bravery.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 03:53:58 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is Choose a Name near Champions?  I forget after all this time?  The fact that Deepak says they drove by the bar tells me they stopped somewhere.

    No, Champions is in the Marriott.  Choose a Name is closer to CnC and Bahia, etc.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 03:59:51 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is Choose a Name near Champions?  I forget after all this time?  The fact that Deepak says they drove by the bar tells me they stopped somewhere.

    No, Champions is in the Marriott.  Choose a Name is closer to CnC and Bahia, etc.


    Thanks for keeping me straight.  Without you I would be dumber than I am now.  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sharon on April 16, 2007, 04:14:25 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Lala's from what I understand from the post it is the Kalpoe cousins who are bad news


    Isn't Michael Dompig a "Kalpoe cousin"  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 16, 2007, 04:19:37 PM
    Quote from: "sharon"
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Lala's from what I understand from the post it is the Kalpoe cousins who are bad news


    Isn't Michael Dompig a "Kalpoe cousin"  :shock:


    A FAMILY AFFAIR

    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    April 6, 2006

    COSBY: What do you make of the fact that it‘s so strange that here‘s this guy who‘s his brother-in-law, Gerold Dompig? Isn‘t that weird to you, too, just that strange connection? And the fact—it was interesting. When we were down there, the authorities were sort of, like, Well, we can‘t really focus on him because of, basically, who he‘s connected to.

    TWITTY: Well, you know, it‘s really not any stranger to me than it is that the Kalpoes are cousins of Gerold Dompig. So you know, they‘re all very connected on that island. It‘s hard to find someone who‘s not a relative or a cousin. So no, it‘s not surprising but—and it‘s not surprising, either, that we even go back to the beginning, like I said. You‘re having officials, such as the lead narcotics again, who‘s beginning to take advantage of Boody as a witness


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 04:22:47 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is Choose a Name near Champions?  I forget after all this time?  The fact that Deepak says they drove by the bar tells me they stopped somewhere.

    No, Champions is in the Marriott.  Choose a Name is closer to CnC and Bahia, etc.


    Thanks for keeping me straight.  Without you I would be dumber than I am now.  :lol:


    Trying to get more information on Oduber's son.  Will post as soon as I get it.  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 16, 2007, 04:22:58 PM
    I cannot provide a link but I do remember something in the initial stages of the investigation regarding Deepak stating that they made a quick stop at a club called Mambo Jambo after leaving C&C's. I know that I questioned myself at the time to why he would made a quick stop at this club.

    Janet


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 04:32:33 PM
    Since neither of the 3 state that they stopped anywhere after they left CnC with Natalee and went to the lighthouse area.  I am thinking that the reason they mentioned the driving around the block more than once (notice both Joran and Deepak say that in some manner) and that seeing the visibility team (always wondered why that was improtant) on the corner just makes me think that they stopped somewhere to either inform someone about their plans.  Plans such as making a video to be uploaded later that night.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 04:34:11 PM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    I cannot provide a link but I do remember something in the initial stages of the investigation regarding Deepak stating that they made a quick stop at a club called Mambo Jambo after leaving C&C's. I know that I questioned myself at the time to why he would made a quick stop at this club.

    Janet


    What is amazing to me is after all the interviews and re-hashing there steps after C&C.. I have only heard once there quick stop at another bar from David Kock. Joran,Dompig or anyone else has never mentioned it.

    It may be nothing..Or it may show that besides the white car following them that other "Pimps" were alerted that Joran and K2 had succeeded. Remember they showed up at the bar right before closing..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 04:44:03 PM
    Quote from: "sharon"
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Lala's from what I understand from the post it is the Kalpoe cousins who are bad news


    Isn't Michael Dompig a "Kalpoe cousin"  :shock:


    This is bad news
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DompigSec3.jpg)

    I think I'd feel safer infront of him than behind him. :o
    (borrowed pic from Klaas' post last thread, I hope OK)

    Hi Monkeys!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Rob on April 16, 2007, 04:50:33 PM
    (http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/ChitoOduber1.png)

    Nelson 'Chito' Oduber Jr.

    http://focus.aw/news.php?id=205


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 04:51:57 PM
    Klaas,
    didn't mean to have the link show in my last post. I was hoping to just borrow the pic, being that I am too lazing to cut,paste,save, bring pic into photobucket than post. Which I could've done instead of this post!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 04:52:24 PM
    This is bad news
    http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DompigSec3.jpg

    I think I'd feel safer infront of him than behind him.  
    (borrowed pic from Klaas' post last thread, I hope OK)

    Hi Monkeys!!!

    http://www.shieldgroupworldwide.com/
    LOL!! He has been a yes man since the beginning for the MEP. His security company specializes in everything that corrupt govt needs for protection. Ill betcha anything it was the MEP that hooked up dompig with that company in israel. He may even being using that state of the art equipment to monitor jossy and diario. We know last week jossy made those accusations against the govt.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 04:54:22 PM
    Hey Rob,
    I was hoping you'd come swooping in w/ info.

    So, shito, I mean chito is ~ 26yrs?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 04:56:06 PM
    You guys see the new Carlo and Van Der Sloot website? Looks like a full service Law Firm they do it all.. You can even send Paulus a note if you like.. :D

    http://www.carlolawoffice.com/
    http://www.carlolawoffice.com/attorneys/index.html


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 04:56:45 PM
    Hey *******, Welcome to the inside. I've ssen you on FP, which I mostly just read, and June05 rwv.

    I did not realize dombpig's sompany was is israel!  Not a connection I would have guessed.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 04:58:13 PM
    NM - no problem, I fixed the link so the picture shows.

    Rob - thanks for the Chito Oduber info  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: SunFreak2 on April 16, 2007, 04:59:56 PM
    Quote from: "sharon"


    Isn't Michael Dompig a "Kalpoe cousin"  :shock:


    Art Woods says that Boeti is Dompig's BIL from his 2nd marriage, and that Bulldog was Dompig's BIL from his first marriage.

    Good grief!!  Shades of Peyton Place.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: SunFreak2 on April 16, 2007, 05:04:33 PM
    I just wanted y'all to know that I didn't fall of the face of the earth.  I am still here.

    My court case is next week.  Going to the law library alot.  Still spring cleaning and getting rid of cacca I toted around for years.  I hope to be back soon with happy news about Cherokee, my dog.  I also have a ton of medical tests coming up.  The main one is CT scan of abdomen and pelvis looking for the pain in my right groin, hopefully a fixable hernia.  

    Love to y'all.  Keep up the good work.  I am so woefully behind.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Rob on April 16, 2007, 05:05:08 PM
    Quote from: "NM"
    Hey Rob,
    I was hoping you'd come swooping in w/ info.

    So, shito, I mean chito is ~ 26yrs?


    Hi Ya NM...
    The info I have is that Chito is about 26 and has two allegations against him. These could be two separate incidents or two involving the same person.

    He is a professional surfer and Gleason Oduber appears to be the manger of the surf team. Gleason could be the brother of Nelson Sr. I think he is.

    One allegation against Chito is the alleged rape of a family maid. I do not know how accurate that is. It might not be accurate at all.

    The second allegation involves the rape of an old girlfriend (possibly an American that has left the island or an Aruban woman who has left the island, either way the woman left the island) and these charges were either never pursued or the initial charges progressed and the fix was put in.

    Paulus Van Der Sloot would have still been in the prosecutors office when this occurred and he would have had intimate knowledge of these charges and could have used them to blackmail people in the MEP and others. Remember the election was right around the corner and this would have killed the MEP if it was known that an Oduber son got preferential treatment.

    Take care Monks.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 05:06:03 PM
    Quote from: "NM"
    Hey *******, Welcome to the inside. I've ssen you on FP, which I mostly just read, and June05 rwv.

    I did not realize dombpig's sompany was is israel!  Not a connection I would have guessed.


    http://shieldgroupworldwide.com/data/home/aboutus/
    (Look at the other pics)

    Thanks..I have seen you as well..

    Well sure..That company,training and equipment is from israel. He has the Israeli experience coming in may to aruba. Many in the MEP and other influential people like the sloots are jewish. So I am not surprised.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 05:07:14 PM
    SunFreak, Great to see you. Best of Luck getting your Pup back and also w/ your tests and any procedures. You're in my prayers.

    *******, I don't want to go to the carlo pvds website for fear of gems.

    Klaas, thank you.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: JusticeforNatalee on April 16, 2007, 05:11:05 PM
    "I think I'd feel safer in front of him (Dompig) than behind him."

    LOLOL


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 05:13:13 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "NM"
    Hey *******, Welcome to the inside. I've ssen you on FP, which I mostly just read, and June05 rwv.

    I did not realize dombpig's sompany was is israel!  Not a connection I would have guessed.


    http://shieldgroupworldwide.com/data/home/aboutus/
    (Look at the other pics)

    Thanks..I have seen you as well..

    Well sure..That company,training and equipment is from israel. He has the Israeli experience coming in may to aruba. Many in the MEP and other influential people like the sloots are jewish. So I am not surprised.


    I had no idea!  Thanks.  I though Anit-wit(anita) was trying to claim they were catholics :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 05:14:53 PM
    Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
    "I think I'd feel safer in front of him (Dompig) than behind him."

    LOLOL


     :lol: I know. W   I   D   E  L  O  A  D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sharon on April 16, 2007, 05:19:46 PM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    Quote from: "sharon"


    Isn't Michael Dompig a "Kalpoe cousin"  :shock:


    A FAMILY AFFAIR

    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    April 6, 2006

    COSBY: What do you make of the fact that it‘s so strange that here‘s this guy who‘s his brother-in-law, Gerold Dompig? Isn‘t that weird to you, too, just that strange connection? And the fact—it was interesting. When we were down there, the authorities were sort of, like, Well, we can‘t really focus on him because of, basically, who he‘s connected to.

    TWITTY: Well, you know, it‘s really not any stranger to me than it is that the Kalpoes are cousins of Gerold Dompig. So you know, they‘re all very connected on that island. It‘s hard to find someone who‘s not a relative or a cousin. So no, it‘s not surprising but—and it‘s not surprising, either, that we even go back to the beginning, like I said. You‘re having officials, such as the lead narcotics again, who‘s beginning to take advantage of Boody as a witness


    Thanks, Janet  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 05:21:12 PM
    Sharon soory it took so long to anser you. Been searching old stuff.
    Yes Michael Dompig is a cousin of the K2


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 05:21:46 PM
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also asked for additional help for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)

    the picture of RST was taken in Curacao. RST is a team of Rechercheurs from Aruba, Curacao and the Netherlands that work on important cases.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sharon on April 16, 2007, 05:24:02 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    I cannot provide a link but I do remember something in the initial stages of the investigation regarding Deepak stating that they made a quick stop at a club called Mambo Jambo after leaving C&C's. I know that I questioned myself at the time to why he would made a quick stop at this club.

    Janet


    What is amazing to me is after all the interviews and re-hashing there steps after C&C.. I have only heard once there quick stop at another bar from David Kock. Joran,Dompig or anyone else has never mentioned it.

    It may be nothing..Or it may show that besides the white car following them that other "Pimps" were alerted that Joran and K2 had succeeded. Remember they showed up at the bar right before closing..


    I'm with Janet on this one!

    I remember Deepak making a comment about another 'stop'.

    But I can't remember where or how we read/heard the comment. Or when.  :?  Which is critical with the forever changing J2K stories. :evil:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 05:24:52 PM
    Quote from: "NM"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "NM"
    Hey *******, Welcome to the inside. I've ssen you on FP, which I mostly just read, and June05 rwv.

    I did not realize dombpig's sompany was is israel!  Not a connection I would have guessed.


    http://shieldgroupworldwide.com/data/home/aboutus/
    (Look at the other pics)

    Thanks..I have seen you as well..

    Well sure..That company,training and equipment is from israel. He has the Israeli experience coming in may to aruba. Many in the MEP and other influential people like the sloots are jewish. So I am not surprised.


    I had no idea!  Thanks.  I though Anit-wit(anita) was trying to claim they were catholics :?


    Michael-anthony Dompig:
    jordy!!!! that's my homeboy and if somebody dissagrees they can kiss my hairy @$$(Comment to Joran on his tickle acct)

    http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=rN56u4ijC5KM4GVU
    Religion: jewish  


    Please dont send me hate mail because I pointed out that alot of people are involved are jewish. I have never made a bad comment about jewish people in my whole life.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 05:25:27 PM
    Quote from: "Rob"


    Paulus Van Der Sloot would have still been in the prosecutors office when this occurred and he would have had intimate knowledge of these charges and could have used them to blackmail people in the MEP and others. Remember the election was right around the corner and this would have killed the MEP if it was known that an Oduber son got preferential treatment.

    Take care Monks.



    Thanks Rob! You protect my son, I'll protect yours, and the game is on. It's easy to see how the cover-up became so widespread.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sharon on April 16, 2007, 05:36:43 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Sharon soory it took so long to anser you. Been searching old stuff.
    Yes Michael Dompig is a cousin of the K2


    No problem yapperz! Thanks.

    But someone should tell Gerold that he needs to 'proofread' his site.

    "After military-and police training in the Caribbean,............... Security Management services directly to costumers trough this privately established company."

    LOL. Maybe he means it  :lol: Do 'masks' count?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 05:46:35 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "Rob"


    Paulus Van Der Sloot would have still been in the prosecutors office when this occurred and he would have had intimate knowledge of these charges and could have used them to blackmail people in the MEP and others. Remember the election was right around the corner and this would have killed the MEP if it was known that an Oduber son got preferential treatment.

    Take care Monks.



    Thanks Rob! You protect my son, I'll protect yours, and the game is on. It's easy to see how the cover-up became so widespread.


    Yup..Makes you wonder just how many of these "sons" are involved in natalee's dissapearance. Of course paulus already had alot of friends in aruba..(Before going into private practice Mr. van der Sloot worked ten years in social legal aid in the Netherlands, four years in the Aruban Government, eight years in the public prosecution and three years as a judge).


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 05:55:13 PM
    *******,
    your post was a stated fact from what we have researched.

    Couldn't be taken as a bad comment.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 16, 2007, 05:56:26 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)

    Thanks Klaas for this info.

    Has it been really cold in aruba or maybe this is a photo from nl.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: SunnyinTX on April 16, 2007, 06:00:58 PM
    Quote from: "Red"
    Front page post:

    Diario Editorial: A TRAITOR AND HIS ANTI-ARUBAN GOVERNMENT … Anti-American too

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2007/04/16/diario-editorial-a-traitor-and-his-anti-aruban-government-anti-american-too/

    Well if Oduber and MEP were upset with Jossy and his freedom of speech before, wait until they read his editorial.

    Then his unbelievably stupid anti-American statements; the case of his own son who tried to rape an American girl in his own home! Hmm

    Jossy, don’t beat around the bush. Tell us how you really feel? Of course we know he will. It is just too bad so many other Arubans cannot see the obvious. Hiding one’s head in the sand and turning your back on injustice is hardley an act of bravery.


    Hi to all...and thank you Red for your continuing interesting and informative front pages....still just shaking my head at Aruba's gall, stupidity, incompetence and blantant lack of respect for any law....ok...back to lurksville..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 06:02:44 PM
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 06:03:46 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "Rob"


    Paulus Van Der Sloot would have still been in the prosecutors office when this occurred and he would have had intimate knowledge of these charges and could have used them to blackmail people in the MEP and others. Remember the election was right around the corner and this would have killed the MEP if it was known that an Oduber son got preferential treatment.

    Take care Monks.



    Thanks Rob! You protect my son, I'll protect yours, and the game is on. It's easy to see how the cover-up became so widespread.


    Yup..Makes you wonder just how many of these "sons" are involved in natalee's dissapearance. Of course paulus already had alot of friends in aruba..(Before going into private practice Mr. van der Sloot worked ten years in social legal aid in the Netherlands, four years in the Aruban Government, eight years in the public prosecution and three years as a judge).



    *******, great to see you posting inside. Someone needs to do a study on how many of the favored sons of Holland end up in KIA. Bet it's infinitesimally a low. They've been covering each others' crimes for decades now outside the spotlight of the motherland. Rotten to the core.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: yapperz1 on April 16, 2007, 06:04:28 PM
    Klaas here is a tidbit on Chito. May help in your search for info

    http://www.one-happy-island.com/icq-user.asp?u=o&i=0
    Oduber, Chito  CHULIBASTER


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 06:12:03 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Klaas here is a tidbit on Chito. May help in your search for info

    http://www.one-happy-island.com/icq-user.asp?u=o&i=0
    Oduber, Chito  CHULIBASTER

    Thanks Yapperz  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 16, 2007, 06:13:51 PM
    Paul A.P.J. van der Sloot, born in the Netherlands (1952), graduated from the University of Tilburg, the Netherlands (LL.M., 1979). Before going into private practice Mr. van der Sloot worked ten years in social legal aid in the Netherlands, four years in the Aruban Government, eight years in the public prosecution and three years as a judge. He was admitted to the bar in 2006. His practice focuses mainly on administrative law and mediation.Languages: Dutch, English, German, French and Papiamento.

    Mediation???  you must be kidding.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 06:23:20 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)


    Nope doesnt look like him..But remember they rotate the dealers.

    Everytime I research this Guido the report's about the 5 witnesses seeing deep scratches on his face disturbs me..Some of the articles say the scratches were 3 inches long :shock:  He was questioned 3 times in aruba and twice in the NL.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 06:25:21 PM
    ******* - very true, I had forgotten about the rotation of dealers.  He may have been at another table too?  I agree he is involved, no doubt in my mind.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 16, 2007, 06:30:20 PM
    Hi Monkeys,

    So sad about the killings at Va. Tech.

    In reading Observers post about the Van der Sloots being Jewish. It makes it more clear about the Beth being Hitlers sister. I am sure when Beth showed up so fast on Aruba they knew they had been caught. So immediatley they wanted to be sure they could discredit her. What better way. JMHO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 07:08:27 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)

    I wonder who the person is in the bottom right hand corner.  Is that a male with blonde highlights.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 07:11:08 PM
    San - good question.  Hard to tell but it looks like a male to me.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 16, 2007, 07:31:51 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)

    I wonder who the person is in the bottom right hand corner.  Is that a male with blonde highlights.


    San, do you mean lower left? I see a person that could be male or female on lower left near the date. Appears to have blonde highlights.

    I also see the shadow of someone on the lower right. where it says 2015.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 16, 2007, 07:37:36 PM
    Any speculation that the Sloots are Jewish is ridiculous.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 16, 2007, 07:43:03 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Any speculation that the Sloots are Jewish is ridiculous.


    Why Carnut? There is nothing wrong with being Jewish. JMHO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 07:48:41 PM
    FYI

    Easy has posted Jossy's answers to some of the accusations made against him today by the person from Utrecht who left a comment on the blog.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 07:58:15 PM
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Any speculation that the Sloots are Jewish is ridiculous.


    Why Carnut? There is nothing wrong with being Jewish. JMHO


    I thought Anita was supposed to be  Buddhist.  :?

    Aw to heck with the whole religion thing - I think all the different religions are worshipping the same God anyway. We should lump them all together and come up with a combined name.  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 16, 2007, 07:58:53 PM
    Thanks BT


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 08:01:15 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Any speculation that the Sloots are Jewish is ridiculous.


    Why Carnut? There is nothing wrong with being Jewish. JMHO


    I thought Anita was supposed to be  Buddhist.  :?

    Aw to heck with the whole religion thing - I think all the different religions are worshipping the same God anyway. We should lump them all together and come up with a combined name.  :wink:

    Amen  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 08:12:06 PM
    Quote from: "NM"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)

    Thanks Klaas for this info.

    Has it been really cold in aruba or maybe this is a photo from nl.


    Sorta looks like Aruba,IMO. Look in the upper right-isn't that a type of palm? I remember seeing a pic of the "Black Team " in aruba with shields and all, and they were covered head to toe also.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 16, 2007, 08:14:43 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Any speculation that the Sloots are Jewish is ridiculous.


    Why Carnut? There is nothing wrong with being Jewish. JMHO


    I thought Anita was supposed to be  Buddhist.  :?

    Aw to heck with the whole religion thing - I think all the different religions are worshipping the same God anyway. We should lump them all together and come up with a combined name.  :wink:

    Amen  :wink:



    I will 3rd that. Amen


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 16, 2007, 08:17:42 PM
    Hey Bleached,

    Has the storm affected you at all?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 08:28:20 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "NM"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)

    Thanks Klaas for this info.

    Has it been really cold in aruba or maybe this is a photo from nl.


    Sorta looks like Aruba,IMO. Look in the upper right-isn't that a type of palm? I remember seeing a pic of the "Black Team " in aruba with shields and all, and they were covered head to toe also.


    MF says Curacao:
    the picture of RST was taken in Curacao. RST is a team of Rechercheurs from Aruba, Curacao and the Netherlands that work on important cases.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: carpe noctem on April 16, 2007, 08:38:56 PM
    Quote from: "sharon"
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Sharon soory it took so long to anser you. Been searching old stuff.
    Yes Michael Dompig is a cousin of the K2


    No problem yapperz! Thanks.

    But someone should tell Gerold that he needs to 'proofread' his site.

    "After military-and police training in the Caribbean,............... Security Management services directly to costumers trough this privately established company."

    LOL. Maybe he means it  :lol: Do 'masks' count?



    That framed saying hangs in his office up on the wall!. "the costumer is always right!" :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 16, 2007, 08:42:08 PM
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Hi Monkeys,

    So sad about the killings at Va. Tech.

    In reading Observers post about the Van der Sloots being Jewish. It makes it more clear about the Beth being Hitlers sister. I am sure when Beth showed up so fast on Aruba they knew they had been caught. So immediatley they wanted to be sure they could discredit her. What better way. JMHO


    Sam ... just watching CNN ... what a tragic day in US history.  :cry:

    Concerning the Hitler remark.  IF Natalee did refer to her mother as being Hitler's sister ... she was probably implying that her mom was controlling.  I am sure my eldest son who was always crossing the bounds of expectation when he was a teen called his Dad and I worse.  The fact that he is still alive and well on planet Earth attests to the fact that his sentiments were only conveyed to his friends.  :)

    Janet


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 16, 2007, 08:43:42 PM
    what is RST?I think the gene pool is less and less.This will end like MacBeth


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 16, 2007, 08:47:33 PM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Another old post from RWV (same link)

    Van der lsoot says to the security guard that was jailed “that they left him at his house with natalee still in the car he exchanged emails with her and they took off (leaving JOran at home). The story is somethign that the 3 boys made up at home by the pool” adn now other kids also said that on monday Joran walked out into the woods by the school and stayed a while…maybe that was the 2 boys teling him about the “story”to tell?? and also here on aruba it is known that the cousins of the 2 Kalpoe boys are “dangerous” people who knows if they have soemthign to do with this?? They own a car rental here and they say they moved to aruba because they were bad in suriname and apparently they are moving form aruba to the US now
    Posted by: AMINA | Monday, June 13, 2005 at 01:20 PM




    thinkin.....is sandra k satish?????


    just a tought


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 16, 2007, 08:47:43 PM
    religon isn't importent in aruba


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 16, 2007, 08:49:08 PM
    if the K2's move here San will meet them on the beaches,sorry wrong quote.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 08:49:22 PM
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Another old post from RWV (same link)

    Van der lsoot says to the security guard that was jailed “that they left him at his house with natalee still in the car he exchanged emails with her and they took off (leaving JOran at home). The story is somethign that the 3 boys made up at home by the pool” adn now other kids also said that on monday Joran walked out into the woods by the school and stayed a while…maybe that was the 2 boys teling him about the “story”to tell?? and also here on aruba it is known that the cousins of the 2 Kalpoe boys are “dangerous” people who knows if they have soemthign to do with this?? They own a car rental here and they say they moved to aruba because they were bad in suriname and apparently they are moving form aruba to the US now
    Posted by: AMINA | Monday, June 13, 2005 at 01:20 PM




    thinkin.....is sandra k satish?????


    just a tought


    Nope, SandraK is NOT Satish.  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 08:59:57 PM
    FWIW - I don't think the Van Der Sloots are Jewish.  Not that it matters, but I believe they are Catholic.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 09:02:17 PM
    Posted by MF at FOB:

    Update: The Minister of Justice H. Croes in a press conference today acknowledged the presence of the KLPD on the island on their last intent to try to solve the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

    During the last 2 years the Aruban government have welcomed the help from all over the world and the ALE has been working with US authorities as well with the Netherlands. Contrary to what has been speculated, the Prosecutors wanted to close the case a long time ago, but on the government insistance in showing that everything possible was done, asked one more time via the KLPD's director Mr. van Zunderd, for their help.

    As he had said previously when he asked for the intervention of the KLPD, this is not a sign of mistrust of the ALE, but wanted the KLPD to investigate the case from another perspective and with a fresh mind and show their interest in solving the case.

    All the documentations and other evidences of the investigation has been sent to the Netherlands, but the investigation in Aruba continued meanwhile and now the Team is on the island for their final phase in their investigation.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 16, 2007, 09:02:34 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "NM"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)

    Thanks Klaas for this info.

    Has it been really cold in aruba or maybe this is a photo from nl.


    Sorta looks like Aruba,IMO. Look in the upper right-isn't that a type of palm? I remember seeing a pic of the "Black Team " in aruba with shields and all, and they were covered head to toe also.


    MF says Curacao:
    the picture of RST was taken in Curacao. RST is a team of Rechercheurs from Aruba, Curacao and the Netherlands that work on important cases.


    She may be right, Aruba is not that hilly and Curacao is.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 16, 2007, 09:03:17 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "Rob"


    Paulus Van Der Sloot would have still been in the prosecutors office when this occurred and he would have had intimate knowledge of these charges and could have used them to blackmail people in the MEP and others. Remember the election was right around the corner and this would have killed the MEP if it was known that an Oduber son got preferential treatment.

    Take care Monks.



    Thanks Rob! You protect my son, I'll protect yours, and the game is on. It's easy to see how the cover-up became so widespread.


    Yup..Makes you wonder just how many of these "sons" are involved in natalee's dissapearance. Of course paulus already had alot of friends in aruba..(Before going into private practice Mr. van der Sloot worked ten years in social legal aid in the Netherlands, four years in the Aruban Government, eight years in the public prosecution and three years as a judge).

    And moreover *******, you can't help but wonder how many of these "sons" all played out the drugging, raping and filming the young tourist girls that visited their tourist trap.
    I think this "sport" went on for years and could have gone on for years to come if the Kalpoes and Joran hadn't dealt Natalee a lethal concoction.
    Now the can of worms is open and slowly but surely the world is seeing the ugly dark side of this Island Paradise.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 16, 2007, 09:05:46 PM
    I just don't get the religous affiliation.  But then I'm not all the religous myself so I'm probably missing something deeper here.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 16, 2007, 09:13:53 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB:

    Update: The Minister of Justice H. Croes in a press conference today acknowledged the presence of the KLPD on the island on their last intent to try to solve the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

    During the last 2 years the Aruban government have welcomed the help from all over the world and the ALE has been working with US authorities as well with the Netherlands. Contrary to what has been speculated, the Prosecutors wanted to close the case a long time ago, but on the government insistance in showing that everything possible was done, asked one more time via the KLPD's director Mr. van Zunderd, for their help.

    As he had said previously when he asked for the intervention of the KLPD, this is not a sign of mistrust of the ALE, but wanted the KLPD to investigate the case from another perspective and with a fresh mind and show their interest in solving the case.

    All the documentations and other evidences of the investigation has been sent to the Netherlands, but the investigation in Aruba continued meanwhile and now the Team is on the island for their final phase in their investigation.


    Good grief, who is this statement playing to, we all know they shut out the FBI, denied Tim Miller's request to search certain areas, refused equipment to help Dave Holloway with the landfill search and on and on......


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 09:14:50 PM
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Hey Bleached,

    Has the storm affected you at all?


    Hey, thanks for asking. Alot of flooded roads, but I live on a higher elevation so things here are dry...even the basement. :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 16, 2007, 09:18:13 PM
    ARUBA - An Island Paradise full of Predatory Parasites

    Put that in your "dance Aruba" commercials!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 09:27:14 PM
    Quote from: "carpe noctem"
    Quote from: "sharon"
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    Sharon soory it took so long to anser you. Been searching old stuff.
    Yes Michael Dompig is a cousin of the K2


    No problem yapperz! Thanks.

    But someone should tell Gerold that he needs to 'proofread' his site.

    "After military-and police training in the Caribbean,............... Security Management services directly to costumers trough this privately established company."

    LOL. Maybe he means it  :lol: Do 'masks' count?



    That framed saying hangs in his office up on the wall!. "the costumer is always right!" :D


     :lol:  :lol: I posted mispellings on their online application after the site was brought to our attention.  Guess we've seen a few costume'rs along the way... :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 16, 2007, 09:30:07 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    ARUBA - An Island Paradise full of Predatory Parasites

    Put that in your "dance Aruba" commercials!


    Those commercials drive me crazy. There are several reasons for that, but one is that I can only understand about half what they say in that little song. Other than the part about dancing, can you understand what they're saying?  :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 09:45:50 PM
    AZSunny wrote;
    Quote
    She may be right, Aruba is not that hilly and Curacao is.


    I totally agree AZ That pics background has 2 hills which is one more than aruba. :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 16, 2007, 09:48:04 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "Rob"


    Paulus Van Der Sloot would have still been in the prosecutors office when this occurred and he would have had intimate knowledge of these charges and could have used them to blackmail people in the MEP and others. Remember the election was right around the corner and this would have killed the MEP if it was known that an Oduber son got preferential treatment.

    Take care Monks.



    Thanks Rob! You protect my son, I'll protect yours, and the game is on. It's easy to see how the cover-up became so widespread.


    Yup..Makes you wonder just how many of these "sons" are involved in natalee's dissapearance. Of course paulus already had alot of friends in aruba..(Before going into private practice Mr. van der Sloot worked ten years in social legal aid in the Netherlands, four years in the Aruban Government, eight years in the public prosecution and three years as a judge).

    And moreover *******, you can't help but wonder how many of these "sons" all played out the drugging, raping and filming the young tourist girls that visited their tourist trap.
    I think this "sport" went on for years and could have gone on for years to come if the Kalpoes and Joran hadn't dealt Natalee a lethal concoction.
    Now the can of worms is open and slowly but surely the world is seeing the ugly dark side of this Island Paradise.


    Agreed..It was a easy game to play too..Places like Carlos and Charlies encourages partying until ya puke. These group trips full of teenage girls with no parents must have been a gold mine for them!!

    I beleave also many of these "pimps" were with J2K that night. Early on I thought it was a lethal concoction..I just dont think so anymore..Very well could have been some type of accident or even a act of violence. A simple overdose just doesnt add up.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 09:50:42 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB:

    Update: The Minister of Justice H. Croes in a press conference today acknowledged the presence of the KLPD on the island on their last intent to try to solve the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

    During the last 2 years the Aruban government have welcomed the help from all over the world and the ALE has been working with US authorities as well with the Netherlands. Contrary to what has been speculated, the Prosecutors wanted to close the case a long time ago, but on the government insistance in showing that everything possible was done, asked one more time via the KLPD's director Mr. van Zunderd, for their help.

    As he had said previously when he asked for the intervention of the KLPD, this is not a sign of mistrust of the ALE, but wanted the KLPD to investigate the case from another perspective and with a fresh mind and show their interest in solving the case.

    All the documentations and other evidences of the investigation has been sent to the Netherlands, but the investigation in Aruba continued meanwhile and now the Team is on the island for their final phase in their investigation.


    For heavens's sake!  Would someone over there please take the crack pipe away from MF!  Who are you kidding??  The FBI even says they were never in the loop.  The evidence was never collected. The prosecutors and ALE wanted things closed within months and so did the government.  It was Beth and Dave that have kept this in the forefront.  Very few on Aruba cared. They just want their tourist dollars back.  Give me a break!! :roll:  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: carpe noctem on April 16, 2007, 09:56:06 PM
    Through the miracle of modern technology...

    The Carlos & Charlie's bartender
    has now been positively identified!!!



    link:

    http://tinyurl.com/3chjts


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: MuffyBee on April 16, 2007, 09:57:23 PM
    Quote from: "carpe noctem"
    Through the miracle of modern technology...

    The Carlos & Charlie's bartender
    has now been positively identified!!!



    link:

    http://tinyurl.com/3chjts


     :)  :)  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 16, 2007, 09:57:37 PM
    nice carpe :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 10:01:38 PM
    Quote from: "carpe noctem"
    Through the miracle of modern technology...

    The Carlos & Charlie's bartender
    has now been positively identified!!!



    link:

    http://tinyurl.com/3chjts


    Not only did they identify the bartender, but several of those drinking and dancing at the bar were recognized .......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OolV3VUAUcw


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 16, 2007, 10:03:23 PM
    Was Anita and the two other sons in Aruba the evening of the 29th, morning of the 30th?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 10:04:03 PM
    Carpe
    The dog lovers of America will be emailing you shortly. LOL :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 10:08:33 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Was Anita and the two other sons in Aruba the evening of the 29th, morning of the 30th?

    According to PVDS the 2 younger boys were there with him.  Anita was in the Netherlands and didn't return until June 2nd (I think).


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 16, 2007, 10:08:34 PM
    KEEP ROCKIN MONKEYS


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: carpe noctem on April 16, 2007, 10:20:39 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "carpe noctem"
    Through the miracle of modern technology...

    The Carlos & Charlie's bartender
    has now been positively identified!!!



    link:

    http://tinyurl.com/3chjts


    Not only did they identify the bartender, but several of those drinking and dancing at the bar were recognized .......

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OolV3VUAUcw




    BB,

    The Shakira Pakira video is HE-sterical!!!

    ROFL! You crack me up.


    ---

    Lalas LOL :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 10:23:40 PM
    HEHEHE


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 10:24:21 PM
    Does anyone remember the name of the political party in the Netherlands that Jossy said Paulus's brother was a member of?  I think it had very few actual members.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 10:29:38 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Does anyone remember the name of the political party in the Netherlands that Jossy said Paulus's brother was a member of?  I think it had very few actual members.


    People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 16, 2007, 10:33:42 PM
    Marco van der Sloot:
    voor Vrijheid en Democratie (VVD)=People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy. Third largest political party in the Netherlands.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 10:43:07 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Does anyone remember the name of the political party in the Netherlands that Jossy said Paulus's brother was a member of?  I think it had very few actual members.


    People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy?



    Thanks.  So is that the PPF party or the PPFD party?  It's always a bunch of letters that I don't understand. What does MEP stand for anyway?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 10:43:46 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Marco van der Sloot:
    voor Vrijheid en Democratie (VVD)=People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy. Third largest political party in the Netherlands.


    Thanks


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 16, 2007, 10:51:18 PM
    What a naughty Carpe.I eat pigs,but I have standards.I feel if,IF,it was an overdose,the body would have been shown.The beating(kicking,too)would have shown.She could have had her head held under water,but it isn't a droning.MURDER IS MURDER


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 10:54:52 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB:

    Update: The Minister of Justice H. Croes in a press conference today acknowledged the presence of the KLPD on the island on their last intent to try to solve the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

    During the last 2 years the Aruban government have welcomed the help from all over the world and the ALE has been working with US authorities as well with the Netherlands. Contrary to what has been speculated, the Prosecutors wanted to close the case a long time ago, but on the government insistance in showing that everything possible was done, asked one more time via the KLPD's director Mr. van Zunderd, for their help.

    As he had said previously when he asked for the intervention of the KLPD, this is not a sign of mistrust of the ALE, but wanted the KLPD to investigate the case from another perspective and with a fresh mind and show their interest in solving the case.

    All the documentations and other evidences of the investigation has been sent to the Netherlands, but the investigation in Aruba continued meanwhile and now the Team is on the island for their final phase in their investigation.


    For heavens's sake!  Would someone over there please take the crack pipe away from MF!  Who are you kidding??  The FBI even says they were never in the loop.  The evidence was never collected. The prosecutors and ALE wanted things closed within months and so did the government.  It was Beth and Dave that have kept this in the forefront.  Very few on Aruba cared. They just want their tourist dollars back.  Give me a break!! :roll:  :roll:
    I agree with you 100% Lala's!  Hi Monkeys!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:08:23 PM
    Bleachedblack.... Thanks for the laugh! Shakira ...Pakira :smt003


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: carpe noctem on April 16, 2007, 11:09:06 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Was Anita and the two other sons in Aruba the evening of the 29th, morning of the 30th?

    According to PVDS the 2 younger boys were there with him.  Anita was in the Netherlands and didn't return until June 2nd (I think).


    Hi Klaas,

    If the lady elephant bazoon wonder Anita Van der sloot

    was in Holland until JUNE 2, 2005...


    Then how do we reconcile that
    with this PV from Satish?

    ---

    SATISH KALPOE - 06/24/2005 Suspect Statement   

    PROCES – VERBAAL



    On Wednesday June 1, 2005 after I had driven round with the police force I called my brother Deepak and together we went to meet Joran at the Racquet club. In the evening hours at around 10:30, I went with my brother Deepak to Joran’s apartment. His father and mother were with him and we told them the invented tale of the Holiday Inn. What I noticed was that each time that my brother Deepak and I were visiting with Joran, his father Paul was there, therefore we could talk with Joran. The father Paul told us that we could be interrogated as suspects also after being interrogated as witnesses. :?:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 11:11:40 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB:

    Update: The Minister of Justice H. Croes in a press conference today acknowledged the presence of the KLPD on the island on their last intent to try to solve the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

    During the last 2 years the Aruban government have welcomed the help from all over the world and the ALE has been working with US authorities as well with the Netherlands. Contrary to what has been speculated, the Prosecutors wanted to close the case a long time ago, but on the government insistance in showing that everything possible was done, asked one more time via the KLPD's director Mr. van Zunderd, for their help.

    As he had said previously when he asked for the intervention of the KLPD, this is not a sign of mistrust of the ALE, but wanted the KLPD to investigate the case from another perspective and with a fresh mind and show their interest in solving the case.

    All the documentations and other evidences of the investigation has been sent to the Netherlands, but the investigation in Aruba continued meanwhile and now the Team is on the island for their final phase in their investigation.


    Good grief, who is this statement playing to, we all know they shut out the FBI, denied Tim Miller's request to search certain areas, refused equipment to help Dave Holloway with the landfill search and on and on......



    Dompig wouldn't even pick up the phone to call the FBI to allow the deepwater boats in. Who was pulling the strings here and who are these idiots trying to fool? They never wanted the FBI in Aruba.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:13:27 PM
    Quote from: "carpe noctem"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Was Anita and the two other sons in Aruba the evening of the 29th, morning of the 30th?

    According to PVDS the 2 younger boys were there with him.  Anita was in the Netherlands and didn't return until June 2nd (I think).


    Hi Klaas,

    If the lady elephant bazoon wonder Anita Van der sloot

    was in Holland until JUNE 2, 2005...


    Then how do we reconcile that
    with this PV from Satish?

    ---

    SATISH KALPOE - 06/24/2005 Suspect Statement   

    PROCES – VERBAAL



    On Wednesday June 1, 2005 after I had driven round with the police force I called my brother Deepak and together we went to meet Joran at the Racquet club. In the evening hours at around 10:30, I went with my brother Deepak to Joran’s apartment. His father and mother were with him and we told them the invented tale of the Holiday Inn. What I noticed was that each time that my brother Deepak and I were visiting with Joran, his father Paul was there, therefore we could talk with Joran. The father Paul told us that we could be interrogated as suspects also after being interrogated as witnesses. :?:
    Carpe, I am glad you posted this, even though I read most of them, (P V), you never know when something else will jump out at you when you see it again....Intimidation by P V D S=The father Paul told us that we could be interrogated as suspects also after being interrogated as witnesses.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:15:04 PM
    Paulus put the fear of God into the two K brothers


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:17:16 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Dompig wouldn't even pick up the phone to call the FBI to allow the deepwater boats in. Who was pulling the strings here and who are these idiots trying to fool? They never wanted the FBI in Aruba.
    Dayhiker, Aruba is full of Liars, that is for sure!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: msmarple on April 16, 2007, 11:18:39 PM
    Supposedly Anita returned to Aruba on June 1, a Wednesday.

    (What do we know for sure, anyway?)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:20:16 PM
    IIRC, Anita supposedly came back on Wednesday, 2/1/05.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 11:20:26 PM
    Quote from: "carpe noctem"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Was Anita and the two other sons in Aruba the evening of the 29th, morning of the 30th?

    According to PVDS the 2 younger boys were there with him.  Anita was in the Netherlands and didn't return until June 2nd (I think).


    Hi Klaas,

    If the lady elephant bazoon wonder Anita Van der sloot

    was in Holland until JUNE 2, 2005...


    Then how do we reconcile that
    with this PV from Satish?

    ---

    SATISH KALPOE - 06/24/2005 Suspect Statement   

    PROCES – VERBAAL



    On Wednesday June 1, 2005 after I had driven round with the police force I called my brother Deepak and together we went to meet Joran at the Racquet club. In the evening hours at around 10:30, I went with my brother Deepak to Joran’s apartment. His father and mother were with him and we told them the invented tale of the Holiday Inn. What I noticed was that each time that my brother Deepak and I were visiting with Joran, his father Paul was there, therefore we could talk with Joran. The father Paul told us that we could be interrogated as suspects also after being interrogated as witnesses. :?:

    I couldn't remember if Anita returned June 1 or June 2.  It was probably June 1.  My mistake.   :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 11:23:42 PM
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)

    I wonder who the person is in the bottom right hand corner.  Is that a male with blonde highlights.


    San, do you mean lower left? I see a person that could be male or female on lower left near the date. Appears to have blonde highlights.

    I also see the shadow of someone on the lower right. where it says 2015.

    Sam, sorry for taking so long to respond.  I meant to say bottom left the guy is sitting on Joran's right hand side.  He looks like a male to me.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:24:45 PM
    Klaas, you were distracted...(my friend used to say that when we forgot something or made a mistake...guess it sounds better :wink: )


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:25:41 PM
    Another interesting thing from Satish's statement...Every time they wanted to talk with Joran, the father Paul was there.... He wanted to make sure everyone of them was gonna say the same BS....Paulus, you are a slimeball!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:26:57 PM
    San, I see the head of the guy you pointed out...may not even be highlighted...could just be the lights overhead....looks like a modern doo.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:28:19 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Klaas, you were distracted...(my friend used to say that when we forgot something or made a mistake...guess it sounds better :wink: )
    Or, she was testing us  (that is the line I use)  :wink:  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:28:38 PM
    That person has a bracelet of some sort on the right arm...gold/silver...not sure.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:30:14 PM
    Quote from: "msmarple"
    Supposedly Anita returned to Aruba on June 1, a Wednesday.

    (What do we know for sure, anyway?)
    Unfortunately, not enough. But, we will find out... :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:30:20 PM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Klaas, you were distracted...(my friend used to say that when we forgot something or made a mistake...guess it sounds better :wink: )
    Or, she was testing us  (that is the line I use)  :wink:  :)


     :)  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 16, 2007, 11:30:40 PM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Dompig wouldn't even pick up the phone to call the FBI to allow the deepwater boats in. Who was pulling the strings here and who are these idiots trying to fool? They never wanted the FBI in Aruba.
    Dayhiker, Aruba is full of Liars, that is for sure!



    They sat on this case for a year and a half before they ever let the Dutch take it over and now they are acting like they have been making a sincere effort all along. This is a load of crap. After a year and a half they were probably self-assured they had trashed all the evidence and incriminating statements to the point the case would never be solved.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 11:32:19 PM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Another interesting thing from Satish's statement...Every time they wanted to talk with Joran, the father Paul was there.... He wanted to make sure everyone of them was gonna say the same BS....Paulus, you are a slimeball!


    It is very obvious that Paulus knew the entire story at this point.  He knew what happened and he was in CYA mode here.  Otherwise he and Joran would have been helping Beth find Natalee.  Heck, they didn't even have the courage to fake caring about her.  That is worse than slimeball.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 11:33:13 PM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: carpe noctem on April 16, 2007, 11:33:24 PM
    I just simply cannot fathom the fact that they
    knew about it by JUNE 1st, 2005!!! ...  and did
    nothing for a week

    (they = Anita and Paul)


    ...and then Paulus
    lied in the Dutch/NOVA interview... he said,
    if I reacall correctly... he found out AFTER
    Joran was arrested and switched up stories.


    "We always told Joran to tell the truth."

    YEAH, RIGHT. :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 11:34:37 PM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Dompig wouldn't even pick up the phone to call the FBI to allow the deepwater boats in. Who was pulling the strings here and who are these idiots trying to fool? They never wanted the FBI in Aruba.
    Dayhiker, Aruba is full of Liars, that is for sure!



    They sat on this case for a year and a half before they ever let the Dutch take it over and now they are acting like they have been making a sincere effort all along. This is a load of crap. After a year and a half they were probably self-assured they had trashed all the evidence and incriminating statements to the point the case would never be solved.


    I agree. It's no big deal to let the Dutch come in and look anymore.  There is nothing left to find and the suspects and witnesses are scattered all over the world.  This is a job for Karma...it's coming Aruba.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:35:15 PM
    Looks like curly hair to me...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:38:38 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


    Curly hair, yes/no?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 16, 2007, 11:39:20 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Looks like curly hair to me...

    Yes it does look curly.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:39:54 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


    Curly hair, yes/no?
    My vote is yes


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 11:40:31 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Looks like curly hair to me...


    When I took a look at that person the other day (and asked who it might be) I thought of GVC.  Not sure why, maybe it was the hair or the arms. Just a thought. I know it wasn't him.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 11:43:18 PM
    Curly and balding, IMO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 11:46:18 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Curly and balding, IMO


    That could be highlights. LOL


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AZSunny on April 16, 2007, 11:49:05 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Curly and balding, IMO


    That could be highlights. LOL


    Yes,  I see the highlights, not professionally done, but not balding...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 11:49:11 PM
    I realize this is a million to one.  Also this photo is from 1987.  Imagine curly hair like Posner's...balding on top.  Similar hair to his:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Posner.jpg)

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 16, 2007, 11:52:39 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I realize this is a million to one.  Also this photo is from 1987.  Imagine curly hair like Posner's...balding on top.  Similar hair to his:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Posner.jpg)

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


     :puker:  :pukel:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 16, 2007, 11:54:44 PM
    LOL, Klaas,
    Always thought that '87 photo of Posner was a bad perm!  I don't think he has curly hair, JMO, from looking at possible photos, and is gray by now?  Of course I guess they have dye in Aruba but think he would have professional barber.  That hair in the photo is a mess!

    I think that is a very young person sitting at the table for some reason, straight posture, thin arms etc.?

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 16, 2007, 11:55:46 PM
    I think I will clean up early tonight...everyone pick up your own banana peels.  I don't have time to do it all. CP405 is doing fine.  She still reads but is busy.  Did anyone notice my sig line?  It's the one and only, almost famous Nemo!  Night to all.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 16, 2007, 11:57:37 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    I think I will clean up early tonight...everyone pick up your own banana peels.  I don't have time to do it all. CP405 is doing fine.  She still reads but is busy.  Did anyone notice my sig line?  It's the one and only, almost famous Nemo!  Night to all.

    Nite Lala's - great to hear CP405 is fine.  Nemo is so cute!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:58:00 PM
    Guess it is a good thing (for his sake) that Posner had money, cause he sure wasn't blessed with good looks  :smt011


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 16, 2007, 11:59:57 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    I think I will clean up early tonight...everyone pick up your own banana peels.  I don't have time to do it all. CP405 is doing fine.  She still reads but is busy.  Did anyone notice my sig line?  It's the one and only, almost famous Nemo!  Night to all.
    Goodnight lala! Yes, Nemo is very cute...endearing


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 12:01:26 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    LOL, Klaas,
    Always thought that '87 photo of Posner was a bad perm!  I don't think he has curly hair, JMO, from looking at possible photos, and is gray by now?  Of course I guess they have dye in Aruba but think he would have professional barber.  That hair in the photo is a mess!

    I think that is a very young person sitting at the table for some reason, straight posture, thin arms etc.?

    .


     :lol:  :lol:  Yep, it could be a perm  :lol:  :lol: But it could be natural too.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Posner2.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 17, 2007, 12:04:11 AM
    Fat?  Person in photo thin?  Would be nice to know who it is as a witness.  Could it be a MB kid?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 12:05:12 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    LOL, Klaas,
    Always thought that '87 photo of Posner was a bad perm!  I don't think he has curly hair, JMO, from looking at possible photos, and is gray by now?  Of course I guess they have dye in Aruba but think he would have professional barber.  That hair in the photo is a mess!

    I think that is a very young person sitting at the table for some reason, straight posture, thin arms etc.?

    .


     :lol:  :lol:  Yep, it could be a perm  :lol:  :lol: But it could be natural too.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Posner2.jpg)

    Looks natural and he's ugly.

    (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Posner1986-1.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:06:44 AM
    O/T  the guy who did all that shooting today at Virg. Tech. was a Chinese student, studying here on a student Visa.... so sad, I am watching Nightline here


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:08:46 AM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    LOL, Klaas,
    Always thought that '87 photo of Posner was a bad perm!  I don't think he has curly hair, JMO, from looking at possible photos, and is gray by now?  Of course I guess they have dye in Aruba but think he would have professional barber.  That hair in the photo is a mess!

    I think that is a very young person sitting at the table for some reason, straight posture, thin arms etc.?

    .


     :lol:  :lol:  Yep, it could be a perm  :lol:  :lol: But it could be natural too.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Posner2.jpg)

    Looks natural and he's ugly.

    (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Posner1986-1.jpg)
    See what I mean... he was even ugly back then, Oh I have to shut up and start behaving here...but...but....its hard :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 12:11:37 AM
    I think I scared everyone off with my Posner picture, lol  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:13:13 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I think I scared everyone off with my Posner picture, lol  :lol:
    ROFLMAO! :smt044


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 12:13:20 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I think I scared everyone off with my Posner picture, lol  :lol:

    It's going to take a lot more than that to scare me off :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 17, 2007, 12:14:12 AM
    Hey guys. It's been a busy and sad day. Blacksburg is 2 hours away from me. John's nephew is a student there. We were able to send a couple of therapists there for an undetermined time period. The networks and parents have filled all available lodging and there was a lot to work out. What a sad, sad tragedy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:15:21 AM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I think I scared everyone off with my Posner picture, lol  :lol:

    It's going to take a lot more than that to scare me off :lol:
    Say! After seeing all the pictures we have seen in the last two years.. :shock:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 12:16:28 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Hey guys. It's been a busy and sad day. Blacksburg is 2 hours away from me. John's nephew is a student there. We were able to send a couple of therapists there for an undetermined time period. The networks and parents have filled all available lodging and there was a lot to work out. What a sad, sad tragedy.

    It's so sad. I heard on the news a bit ago that they are wondering now if this shooter WAS the one who made the bomb threats.  That he may have been testing the security.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:16:40 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Hey guys. It's been a busy and sad day. Blacksburg is 2 hours away from me. John's nephew is a student there. We were able to send a couple of therapists there for an undetermined time period. The networks and parents have filled all available lodging and there was a lot to work out. What a sad, sad tragedy.
    I am still in shock over it, very sad!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 17, 2007, 12:17:41 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    O/T  the guy who did all that shooting today at Virg. Tech. was a Chinese student, studying here on a student Visa.... so sad, I am watching Nightline here


    Me 2


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 17, 2007, 12:20:55 AM
    San,
    Hideous!  

    What I tried to do was look at Aruban photos of things Posner was reported to have attended or participate in and look for a common denomnator face.  I think I selected the wrong one as this is even uglier!

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 17, 2007, 12:21:23 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Hey guys. It's been a busy and sad day. Blacksburg is 2 hours away from me. John's nephew is a student there. We were able to send a couple of therapists there for an undetermined time period. The networks and parents have filled all available lodging and there was a lot to work out. What a sad, sad tragedy.


    Glad to hear this...I can see that the students who were in harms way and others will need someone to talk to.  Tragedy is an understatement..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 17, 2007, 12:22:47 AM
    Blacksburg is the sort of place you send your kid to for a really top notch education in a very safe place. It's just a rural, beautiful area, with lots of natural beauty and not much else other than VT. The usual businesses that cater to the college kids, but hardly a party town. It's very tranquil, and lots of areas that remind you of Mayberry. A lot of the most popular activities for the students are "outdoorsy": hiking trails, picnic areas, etc. It's just hard to imagine.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 17, 2007, 12:24:18 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I think I scared everyone off with my Posner picture, lol  :lol:


    I just couldn't come up with anyone that had that type of hair in all the pics.....we don't scare off that easy or we'd be gone long ago.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:27:16 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Blacksburg is the sort of place you send your kid to for a really top notch education in a very safe place. It's just a rural, beautiful area, with lots of natural beauty and not much else other than VT. The usual businesses that cater to the college kids, but hardly a party town. It's very tranquil, and lots of areas that remind you of Mayberry. A lot of the most popular activities for the students are "outdoorsy": hiking trails, picnic areas, etc. It's just hard to imagine.
    crazybaby, I know what you mean...Two weeks ago was the one year anniversary of the school shooting near me. The Amish schoolhouse shooting. I am starting to fear that disturbed people who want to make a name for themselves on the "way out" are choosing our schools to do this in? We need better security, it is a crying shame..that we live in a world that has come to this


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on April 17, 2007, 12:27:31 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Blacksburg is the sort of place you send your kid to for a really top notch education in a very safe place. It's just a rural, beautiful area, with lots of natural beauty and not much else other than VT. The usual businesses that cater to the college kids, but hardly a party town. It's very tranquil, and lots of areas that remind you of Mayberry. A lot of the most popular activities for the students are "outdoorsy": hiking trails, picnic areas, etc. It's just hard to imagine.


    Local kid, friend of my sons went there...lost his brother 2 yrs ago in Iraq and still has friends there.  Regardless, it's just sickening....my DH was thinking how kids can't even go to school safely anymore.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 17, 2007, 12:32:21 AM
    Quote from: "yapperz1"
    There also was some discussion as to when Joran emailed RWV about removing his pic.
    I found this:

    http://tinyurl.com/2brzqo

    Thursday, June 09, 2005
    Natalee Holloway Suspect May Have Contacted Blogger Hours Before Arrest
    UPDATE: A reader suggested pinging the IP associated with the emails. I am afraid I am not a techie but I did manage to do this. The emails originated at SLBH/SETAR ARUBA SPRINTLINK.

     The reader provided image at right is said to picture, left to right Satish K, Joran Van Der Sloot, and Deepak K the three men arrested today in the Natalee Holloway disapearance.

    The Dutch suspect, Joran Andreas Petrus Van Der Sloot, a student at Aruba International School, came out of his home in the upper-class neighbourhood of Oranjestad on Thursday with his head covered in a blue-and-green towel. Police identified the Surinamese brothers only as Satish and Deepak K.

    The face of Van Der Sloot is blurred in keeping with a commitment made to an emailer from last night who claimed to be Joran Van Der Sloot. Prior to altering the image, it was indeed Van Der Sloot as I have come to see him through his now down tickle.com website.

    I'm well aware that today's age of Internet communication allows for anyone to pretend to be whomever they wish through anonymous emails; however, if I had reason to suspect it was not Joran who emailed, I would not make this report. But, in all candor, I have no way of absolutely confirming the identity of the emailer.

    As was once displayed here, this blogged contained an image of Joran Van Der Sloot after the image seemed to be taken down from its original location at Current Affair. While I am sure the image appears elsewhere, the emailer claiming to be Van Der Sloot politely requested that the image be taken down out of respect for his privacy stating it was one of the few remaining he could find, that he was only 17 and that he didn't want to see his face plastered all over CNN. He also stated that he hoped to one day travel to the US to continue his education, presumably at the college level.

    My initial response was to request verification of his identity, however without waiting to hear back I wrote the individual again after dropping the image and stated it was a sign of good faith and asked if he could communicate with me. I also said that I felt I understood some aspects of his position, that there is much he could not and should not say, but felt that at the same time there may be some things he could and should perhaps say given all the reports of his involvement. I was surprised when the emailer responded and was fully prepared for it to be a total sham - which admittedly, it could still be.

    He stated that he had created a Hotmail account specifically for requesting the image be taken down, that he would not mind communicating if he could but that he would not be able to do so without first talking to his Father.

    Late last night I wrote back and suggested that anything he did choose to share should first be reviewed by his Father, purportedly a Judge, and also an attorney.  My email went out just a few hours prior to the six AM arrest of the three suspects and I have not heard back from the account since.


    KLAAS, Stay with me on this one, OK?

    do you remember a time when Dan was going to have a large break-through in the case and Red & Tom had posted it here.  It was early on in the case, very early on and Dan kept saying 'in a few more minutes, a few more minute.'  Daylight came and still that break-through was not posted as to his insider information about who killed Natalee.

    This was the night that he made contact with Joran & Paulus, and the Scubajap and the Witch with the broomhair were the mediators.  Am I the only one who remembers this occasion?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 17, 2007, 12:32:52 AM
    O/T

    I hope our northeastern monkeys are all safe as well,  Maine is getting pummeled with snowfall still even right now.  Power outages reportedy rampant.   :shock:

    And I am sure many are watching coverage of the tragedy at VT.

    It is just overwhelming to think about.  We are not prepared for anything like these kinds of attacks at all.  I don't know if it is possible to prepare but at least they need a plan and a way to shut down the campuses quickly.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: crazybabyborg on April 17, 2007, 12:34:57 AM
    Whether it's the Amish school, Columbine, or VT, I just do not understand why someone who wants to "check out" of this life feels the right to take innocent people they don't even know along with them.

    I'll remember the families and friends tonight in my prayers. Kids in the prime of their life, with all the promise of their future just snuffed out. That's the essence of the tragedy with Natalee, too.

    I'm done with the O/T. Thanks for the endless monkey patience.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 17, 2007, 12:35:19 AM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    I cannot provide a link but I do remember something in the initial stages of the investigation regarding Deepak stating that they made a quick stop at a club called Mambo Jambo after leaving C&C's. I know that I questioned myself at the time to why he would made a quick stop at this club.

    Janet


    That was also what Kock the attorney said, same as where Dash said they had other students.  That's my recall also.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 17, 2007, 12:36:56 AM
    Quote from: "NM"
    Hey *******, Welcome to the inside. I've ssen you on FP, which I mostly just read, and June05 rwv.

    I did not realize dombpig's sompany was is israel!  Not a connection I would have guessed.


    Dompig's son listed his religious choice as Jewish on his my space page, and as I recall I asked Klaas if she thought he might be related to the Scubajap since she had defended Dompig so vehemently.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 12:37:15 AM
    By the way, MF is saying it is NOT Oduber's son Chito that was accused of raping his girlfriend.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 17, 2007, 12:38:57 AM
    I do remember on RWV there was a time a few days into the case when Riehl thought sure he would break the case momentarily, and was just waiting on "confirmation" for something. Never came.

    The tragedy at Virginia Tech is very much in my thoughts and prayers.

    Has anyone else noticed that these school shootings almost ALWAYS happen in April?

    I have a theory about that.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 17, 2007, 12:44:07 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    [KLAAS, Stay with me on this one, OK?

    do you remember a time when Dan was going to have a large break-through in the case and Red & Tom had posted it here.  It was early on in the case, very early on and Dan kept saying 'in a few more minutes, a few more minute.'  Daylight came and still that break-through was not posted as to his insider information about who killed Natalee.

    This was the night that he made contact with Joran & Paulus, and the Scubajap and the Witch with the broomhair were the mediators.  Am I the only one who remembers this occasion?



    Yes, we were all hitting "refresh" key over and over, waiting and waiting and then nothing.  Dan never even offered an explanation as best I recall.

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 12:46:14 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    [KLAAS, Stay with me on this one, OK?

    do you remember a time when Dan was going to have a large break-through in the case and Red & Tom had posted it here.  It was early on in the case, very early on and Dan kept saying 'in a few more minutes, a few more minute.'  Daylight came and still that break-through was not posted as to his insider information about who killed Natalee.

    This was the night that he made contact with Joran & Paulus, and the Scubajap and the Witch with the broomhair were the mediators.  Am I the only one who remembers this occasion?



    Yes, we were all hitting "refresh" key over and over, waiting and waiting and then nothing.  Dan never even offered an explanation as best I recall.

    .

    How did I miss Tylers question?  YES, OMG that night drove me NUTS!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 17, 2007, 12:47:09 AM
    Another O/T

    Remember last week when I said I had a new shipment of dog food without any wheat gluten, Natural Balance Venison, $2 a can, etc. and that meant it would be recalled tomorrow?

    Well, today it was!  I am so upset because this is the second time this has happened to me!  They should not announce their product perfectly safe and then sell a bunch of it and only then recall it.  Shipping on that amount is very expensive, too, not to mention having fed this to my nursing mothers for a week.

     :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: sb on April 17, 2007, 12:51:25 AM
    I've posted it before, but I personally think these shootings like Columbine and the event today, take place in April more than any other time because that is sort of the "summation" time of the year for most school environments. It is when the awards and honors are announced, when the teams, etc. receive recognition, and it is also the run-up to prom season.

    It is the time when the misfit and the "loser" feels the most alienated and slighted when they see the other kids get the awards and the prom dates and participate in all the activities they are left out of. So they decide to get even by taking out the "jocks" (the Columbine effect) and lashing out at those they perceive as having hurt them.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:51:44 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    I do remember on RWV there was a time a few days into the case when Riehl thought sure he would break the case momentarily, and was just waiting on "confirmation" for something. Never came.

    The tragedy at Virginia Tech is very much in my thoughts and prayers.

    Has anyone else noticed that these school shootings almost ALWAYS happen in April?

    I have a theory about that.
    What is the theory? I did notice that it is always this same time of year? TIA


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 12:55:10 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Another O/T

    Remember last week when I said I had a new shipment of dog food without any wheat gluten, Natural Balance Venison, $2 a can, etc. and that meant it would be recalled tomorrow?

    Well, today it was!  I am so upset because this is the second time this has happened to me!  They should not announce their product perfectly safe and then sell a bunch of it and only then recall it.  Shipping on that amount is very expensive, too, not to mention having fed this to my nursing mothers for a week.

     :(

    OMG, I cannot believe that!  I've been feeding my dogs Pedigree.  So far none have been recalled.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 17, 2007, 12:55:43 AM
    Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
    Whether it's the Amish school, Columbine, or VT, I just do not understand why someone who wants to "check out" of this life feels the right to take innocent people they don't even know along with them.

    I'll remember the families and friends tonight in my prayers. Kids in the prime of their life, with all the promise of their future just snuffed out. That's the essence of the tragedy with Natalee, too.

    I'm done with the O/T. Thanks for the endless monkey patience.


    There's always going to be someone who's gonna 'check out'. It's life.

    Mighta turned out different if someone in class could have had the ability to shoot back.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 12:57:19 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    I've posted it before, but I personally think these shootings like Columbine and the event today, take place in April more than any other time because that is sort of the "summation" time of the year for most school environments. It is when the awards and honors are announced, when the teams, etc. receive recognition, and it is also the run-up to prom season.

    It is the time when the misfit and the "loser" feels the most alienated and slighted when they see the other kids get the awards and the prom dates and participate in all the activities they are left out of. So they decide to get even by taking out the "jocks" (the Columbine effect) and lashing out at those they perceive as having hurt them.
    Hmmm very interesting theory (as far as this and Columbine) The guy a year ago at the Amish school was an older man. Had a family and all (what a nutcase he was) I was kinda wondering if it was people at the end phase of seasonal affective disorder or SAD. Being all in April? But your theory is good also. I hope we can figure something out soon, this has to stop!


    Title: Blind Rage Syndrome
    Post by: IBE on April 17, 2007, 12:57:33 AM
    I wonder if we are heading to cameras all around like in London?

    I know someone, Ann Miller, talked to her in person tonight, who has taken the OJ case and divided it into a very reasonable study in Blind Rage Syndrome... taken a long time to get her theory together. Seems simple now. She has taken something complex and divided into steps.

    She wasn't familiar with the Natalee Holloway case, but was extremely interested in it when I started telling her what we know.....  I am to update her more.

    Hope I don't blow the margins:
    http://www.ojsimpson-no-ifs-murder-theory.com/HTMLPages/Summary.htm

    There are certain steps that lead to Blind Rage Syndrome and might be applied to this case. She wants me to fill her in more.

    1. Abandoment
    2,Drugs, Alcohol
    3,Attacks on ego/self image
    4. Jealousy

    I just skimmed over the suspects and the take was Guido and Joran.. with the rage from Joran.

    I didn't know that OJ was involved in porno..

    I just proof read her book coming out. Amazing step by step that night in this summary and they she provides the details to each step that happened that day and night.

    Check out this link. Well worth it; could apply to the Natalee case too.???


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:00:24 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Another O/T

    Remember last week when I said I had a new shipment of dog food without any wheat gluten, Natural Balance Venison, $2 a can, etc. and that meant it would be recalled tomorrow?

    Well, today it was!  I am so upset because this is the second time this has happened to me!  They should not announce their product perfectly safe and then sell a bunch of it and only then recall it.  Shipping on that amount is very expensive, too, not to mention having fed this to my nursing mothers for a week.

     :(

    OMG, I cannot believe that!  I've been feeding my dogs Pedigree.  So far none have been recalled.
    Me too Klaas, Pedigree. I must say also, my dogs ARE peeing a lot more lately, and drinking more>? Or, it seems that way to me, maybe I am just noticing it more?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IBE on April 17, 2007, 01:02:15 AM
    Ok what did I do wrong... it was supposed to have a link. :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:03:04 AM
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Ok what did I do wrong... it was supposed to have a link. :roll:

    You added the URL tags and didn't need to.  I fixed it  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:05:55 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Single source is bad, both in software and dogfood.

    Variety is good, both in software and dogfood.

    O/T software question for you Carnut.

    Have you ever used WinTask?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Anna on April 17, 2007, 01:07:55 AM
    Goodnight, Monkeys!

    .


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IBE on April 17, 2007, 01:07:58 AM
    a couple months ago my dog went through the peeing, drinking lots of water and you could see in his eyes he wasn't feeling well. I had changed dog food (dry) but now am doing Purina. I had a can of cat food on the list I had bought for my cat as a treat around Christmas... never opened it and the one for the dog was on the recall list too. I feel very lucky that I was lazy.. or whatever, it was not to open those cans.

    It's getting harder and harder finding dog/cat food. Sorry Anna. I hope it works out better for you and your doggie family!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:08:15 AM
    Nite Anna


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:09:53 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Single source is bad, both in software and dogfood.

    Variety is good, both in software and dogfood.

    O/T software question for you Carnut.

    Have you ever used WinTask?


    No, was not aware of it.

    Looking at the PR on the website it does look like something useful for a power user.

    Well I'm taking a "crash" self learning lesson right now, LOL.  I want to use it to run a script to update 3000 items in a database.  If it works, and it should, will save me alot of time and keystrokes.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IBE on April 17, 2007, 01:10:53 AM
    There's going to be a lot of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome at VA Tech. It is sooooo sad. Can you imagine having a son.daughter there and wondering if the phone will ring with good or bad news... like those in the military.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:11:10 AM
    Quote from: "IBE"
    a couple months ago my dog went through the peeing, drinking lots of water and you could see in his eyes he wasn't feeling well. I had changed dog food (dry) but now am doing Purina. I had a can of cat food on the list I had bought for my cat as a treat around Christmas... never opened it and the one for the dog was on the recall list too. I feel very lucky that I was lazy.. or whatever, it was not to open those cans.

    It's getting harder and harder finding dog/cat food. Sorry Anna. I hope it works out better for you and your doggie family!

    IBE - to my knowledge...so far, no Pedigree product is involved in the recall.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:12:10 AM
    From the Pedigree website:

    Dog lovers,

    We would like you to know that PEDIGREE® Food For Dogs is not a part of the recent nationwide pet food recall initiated by Menu Foods and other companies. The safety of products not involved in the recall was validated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 23, 2007. According to the FDA, pet owners should feel confident feeding unrecalled products to their pets. All of our PEDIGREE® products remain a safe, nutritious and delicious way to feed your best friends.

    Menu Foods does not make PEDIGREE® dry or wet Food For Dogs and there is no melamine in our wet or dry products.

    As dog lovers ourselves, the safety and nutritional quality of our food is our top priority, and you should continue to feel confident feeding our food to your dog.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:16:51 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Single source is bad, both in software and dogfood.

    Variety is good, both in software and dogfood.
    Carnut, you must admit that this whole dogfood thing has hit so many varieties that one doesn't know where to go anymore. My Furry friends are part of my family, two dogs here... and do not want to harm them, especially when feeding them and thinking we are doing a good thing for them.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:18:58 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    From the Pedigree website:

    Dog lovers,

    We would like you to know that PEDIGREE® Food For Dogs is not a part of the recent nationwide pet food recall initiated by Menu Foods and other companies. The safety of products not involved in the recall was validated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 23, 2007. According to the FDA, pet owners should feel confident feeding unrecalled products to their pets. All of our PEDIGREE® products remain a safe, nutritious and delicious way to feed your best friends.

    Menu Foods does not make PEDIGREE® dry or wet Food For Dogs and there is no melamine in our wet or dry products.

    As dog lovers ourselves, the safety and nutritional quality of our food is our top priority, and you should continue to feel confident feeding our food to your dog.
    I hope it stays safe too! This is what I have given my doggies. Once in awhile, they got something else...but not any more. (Other than a snack from mommy's plate)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Carnut on April 17, 2007, 01:20:31 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Single source is bad, both in software and dogfood.

    Variety is good, both in software and dogfood.
    Carnut, you must admit that this whole dogfood thing has hit so many varieties that one doesn't know where to go anymore. My Furry friends are part of my family, two dogs here... and do not want to harm them, especially when feeding them and thinking we are doing a good thing for them.


    Yes, there is a lot of fear on the subject and the pet food companies are reacting with an abundance of caution by recalling everything that could possibly involved.

    The best you can do is feed you pet a variety of foods, even a variety in each bowl full so that pet won't be getting 'only' food that might be 'bad'.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: casa on April 17, 2007, 01:20:40 AM
    I feed my kitties 9 lives and little friskies.  So far neither is on the list.  I buy it at wal mart but I do not use the wal mart brand.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:22:09 AM
    Quote from: "IBE"
    There's going to be a lot of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome at VA Tech. It is sooooo sad. Can you imagine having a son.daughter there and wondering if the phone will ring with good or bad news... like those in the military.
    I cannot even imagine being one of the parents there right now. Poor CBB is affected by this it seems, and she and John are trying to help out. {{{{{CBB}}}}} Monkey hugs to you!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: casa on April 17, 2007, 01:23:30 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    There's going to be a lot of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome at VA Tech. It is sooooo sad. Can you imagine having a son.daughter there and wondering if the phone will ring with good or bad news... like those in the military.
    I cannot even imagine being one of the parents there right now. Poor CBB is affected by this it seems, and she and John are trying to help out. {{{{{CBB}}}}} Monkey hugs to you!


    I cannot imagine either.  I have 2 daughters in college and one that works at a college.  I have talked to all three just to hear their voices!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:33:30 AM
    Quote from: "casa"
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    There's going to be a lot of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome at VA Tech. It is sooooo sad. Can you imagine having a son.daughter there and wondering if the phone will ring with good or bad news... like those in the military.
    I cannot even imagine being one of the parents there right now. Poor CBB is affected by this it seems, and she and John are trying to help out. {{{{{CBB}}}}} Monkey hugs to you!


    I cannot imagine either.  I have 2 daughters in college and one that works at a college.  I have talked to all three just to hear their voices!!!
    Aww, I'll bet you did need to talk to them. As, I said, I am still in shock over this I beleive, surreal and all. Some things are so sad, it takes awhile to actually sink in. (With me anyways) I still look back at 9/11, and have a rough time coming to grips with the severity of what happened. It just is so hard to bare these things. I guess that is one of the reasons I feel involved in Natalee's case, At first, she seemed to be a victim of an ordinary crime. That was bad enough. As time went by, it became clear that this was not your typical crime. It became obvious that this was a cover-up. It became obvious that a Dutch Judge (or whatever he is) and his son , and of course protecting Tourism at all costs, are more important than human life itself. Natalee's life.


    Title: Thanks
    Post by: IBE on April 17, 2007, 01:37:31 AM
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:40:03 AM
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:43:15 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.
    IBE and Klaas, so do I. I think he is more involved than originally thought..... Why did he leave so fast? Why have people said they saw deep scratches on his face that week? Why did the prosecution arrest him? Also, when the two years is up for Joran and the K2 bros, will Guido still be a suspect for two years? Two years from his arrest? Remember his arrest was less than a year ago.


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:46:27 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.
    IBE and Klaas, so do I. I think he is more involved than originally thought..... Why did he leave so fast? Why have people said they saw deep scratches on his face that week? Why did the prosecution arrest him? Also, when the two years is up for Joran and the K2 bros, will Guido still be a suspect for two years? Two years from his arrest? Remember his arrest was less than a year ago.
    Or will "case closed" absolve all of them, even Guido,GVC....etc etc


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:47:19 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.
    IBE and Klaas, so do I. I think he is more involved than originally thought..... Why did he leave so fast? Why have people said they saw deep scratches on his face that week? Why did the prosecution arrest him? Also, when the two years is up for Joran and the K2 bros, will Guido still be a suspect for two years? Two years from his arrest? Remember his arrest was less than a year ago.

    Ah, good point.  BUT, if the case is closed June 1st without going to trial I suspect Guido will be released as a suspect too.  That still does not mean the case can't be opened back up.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:48:19 AM
    O/T - what do you guys think of this for FOM?   :lol:  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FOMrocket4th.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 01:52:24 AM
    Pet-food recall: What you need to know

    Update, 4/16: 4,211 pets have been reported as deceased into our Pet Connection database.

    Pet-lovers are understandably worried about the massive, voluntary recall of many brands of pet food and reports of pet deaths. New to the site?


    http://www.petconnection.com/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:53:49 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    O/T - what do you guys think of this for FOM?   :lol:  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FOMrocket4th.gif)
    Klaas, I think she will love that! Very Neat... :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 01:55:56 AM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Anna how many puppies have you lost due to this horrendous pet food problem?
    I hope none! And I hope she doesn't lose any.....Men  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 02:01:21 AM
    GOODNIGHT ALL - Tomorrow I'll be working and lurking again.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 02:01:39 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Anna how many puppies have you lost due to this horrendous pet food problem?
    I hope none! And I hope she doesn't lose any.....Men  :roll:
    Carnut, I don't know if you were here at the time, but a lil over a year ago?...Anna had a very ill dog, and it was from something similar to this . It was so sad, the dog needed surgery and emergency pet care and all. We werent sure the dog would make it. They put some kind of life jacket on the poor thing, I think a decompression jacket? I am sure this now a year later must be very scarey for her, as she is taking care of puppies and all.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 02:06:16 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    GOODNIGHT ALL - Tomorrow I'll be working and lurking again.
    Goodnight Klaas, I am right behind you! Pray for the people in Virginia Tech. monkeys... and Justice for Natalee!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 17, 2007, 02:16:00 AM
    Quote from: "sb"
    I've posted it before, but I personally think these shootings like Columbine and the event today, take place in April more than any other time because that is sort of the "summation" time of the year for most school environments. It is when the awards and honors are announced, when the teams, etc. receive recognition, and it is also the run-up to prom season.

    It is the time when the misfit and the "loser" feels the most alienated and slighted when they see the other kids get the awards and the prom dates and participate in all the activities they are left out of. So they decide to get even by taking out the "jocks" (the Columbine effect) and lashing out at those they perceive as having hurt them.


    Well, I have a theory about today/s shooting but it is nothing near yours, but I will refrain from it until I have more definitive information but I think you would be interested in what my theory is.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tylergal on April 17, 2007, 02:29:59 AM
    Quote from: "AZSunny"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "NM"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)

    Thanks Klaas for this info.

    Has it been really cold in aruba or maybe this is a photo from nl.


    Sorta looks like Aruba,IMO. Look in the upper right-isn't that a type of palm? I remember seeing a pic of the "Black Team " in aruba with shields and all, and they were covered head to toe also.


    MF says Curacao:
    the picture of RST was taken in Curacao. RST is a team of Rechercheurs from Aruba, Curacao and the Netherlands that work on important cases.


    She may be right, Aruba is not that hilly and Curacao is.


    Looking at this picture, it seems that Jacobs has joined them.  Is that him on the right?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 02:50:14 AM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Was Anita and the two other sons in Aruba the evening of the 29th, morning of the 30th?


    According to Paulus Van der Sloot's witness statement ... Sabastian and Valentijn were home with him in Aruba.  According to Anita Van der Sloot .. she returned from Holland on June 1, 2005.

    Janet

    Paulus Van der Sloot
    Witness Statement
    June 18, 2005

    On May 30th 2005, in the nightly hours, I did not pick up Joran from anywhere. I slept solidly through the night without waking up. On May 30th in the hours of the morning, I did not notice anything different/out of the ordinary with Joran. According to me he got onto the bus of the I.S.A. with his brothers Sebastian and Valentijn just like he always does. I am not absolutely sure about that because I didn't notice it and because Joran didn't have to be at school every day during that period.


    Anita Van der Sloot
    On the Record w/ Greta
    June 23, 2005

    ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He's very quiet. He's very shy. He doesn't like media coverage at all. And he's very much hurt by things that are happening. And as I look back — I mean, I came back from Holland Wednesday, and I was so surprised at seeing three young men — one kid, two men — involved, maybe, in the disappearance of a girl.......


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 03:38:53 AM
    Quote from: "Dayhiker"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB:

    Update: The Minister of Justice H. Croes in a press conference today acknowledged the presence of the KLPD on the island on their last intent to try to solve the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

    During the last 2 years the Aruban government have welcomed the help from all over the world and the ALE has been working with US authorities as well with the Netherlands. Contrary to what has been speculated, the Prosecutors wanted to close the case a long time ago, but on the government insistance in showing that everything possible was done, asked one more time via the KLPD's director Mr. van Zunderd, for their help.

    As he had said previously when he asked for the intervention of the KLPD, this is not a sign of mistrust of the ALE, but wanted the KLPD to investigate the case from another perspective and with a fresh mind and show their interest in solving the case.

    All the documentations and other evidences of the investigation has been sent to the Netherlands, but the investigation in Aruba continued meanwhile and now the Team is on the island for their final phase in their investigation.


    Good grief, who is this statement playing to, we all know they shut out the FBI, denied Tim Miller's request to search certain areas, refused equipment to help Dave Holloway with the landfill search and on and on......



    Dompig wouldn't even pick up the phone to call the FBI to allow the deepwater boats in. Who was pulling the strings here and who are these idiots trying to fool? They never wanted the FBI in Aruba.


    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    January 12, 2006

    TWITTY: Well, I think Tim Miller was exactly right. This is not a new lead. This is something that we have discussed with the FBI since as early as September. And, you know, I think that it was in the—in October, possibly early November, when Tim Miller was trying to finish this search when, of course, the depth of the water exceeded his equipment. And that‘s when he was needing the officials on the island to contact or pick up the phone and make one phone call to the FBI for some additional equipment. And they refused to do that.


    Associated Press
    August 8, 2005

    The FBI will gain access to investigative reports in the Natalee Holloway case, after a judge turned down a motion by Joran Van Der Sloot's defense attorney to keep the agency from participating in the investigation.  The decision gives FBI agents access to transcripts of interrogations of suspects in the case and other information collected by Aruban authorities. Holloway's family members were encouraged by the decision.  "It gives more eyes and ears to the investigation," her father Dave Holloway said. "If the FBI can give any input or recommendation to the Aruban authorities, that's good."


    Harris Faulkner
    NANCY GRACE
    September 28, 2005

    HARRIS FAULKNER, "A CURRENT AFFAIR": For instance, I never knew until talking with Beth this week that the FBI was never given a single document, audio or visual, in this case. And now we`ve confirmed that, and I know you have done so, too. All along, we had thought this summer, you know, maybe they were being held at bay because of Dutch or Aruban law. And then we saw the Aruban prime minister about a month ago come out and say, FBI, come on in, inviting them in, I thought in a more substantive manner. Maybe we all thought that, too. But when Beth told me, sure, there was a Dutch official who flew from Holland all the way to Quantico to share information, but didn`t leave a single thing in the hands of the FBI


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 07:31:32 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.


    BET THE FARM  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 07:37:16 AM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    Another O/T

    Remember last week when I said I had a new shipment of dog food without any wheat gluten, Natural Balance Venison, $2 a can, etc. and that meant it would be recalled tomorrow?

    Well, today it was!  I am so upset because this is the second time this has happened to me!  They should not announce their product perfectly safe and then sell a bunch of it and only then recall it.  Shipping on that amount is very expensive, too, not to mention having fed this to my nursing mothers for a week.

     :(


    hi anna

    get some chicken and rice and throw some carrots in the mix

    i cook the carrots a little bit to make them soft

    make enough for 3-4 days and do it again..

    if you were closer we could make some chicken-rice- carrot dog food 8)



    i lost 2 dogs in the past year, both were very healthy but they were older
    and both died within a few months of each other....suspicious in my and the vets mind but we brushed it off because they were older but not super old and this was before the dog food problem :x

    makes me so mad  :x

    so much for TESTING of products in BATCHES like companies should do


    i hate em all


    geeesh, seems like i have been full of hate lately.......



     :x
    of thats RIGHT,,, BECAUSE ITS FOR GOOD REASON


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: spooky112483 on April 17, 2007, 07:38:55 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.


    BET THE FARM  8)


    The farm and some ocean front property :wink:


    Title: Re: Thanks
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 07:39:27 AM
    Quote from: "spooky112483"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IBE"
    Thanks Klaas!

    I mentioned all the suspects very quickly to her and she was very interested how Guido related to the mix... she thought he did it more than Joran... just a quick off the top... not knowing much about all the ins and outs. jealousy

    I do think Guido is involved.


    BET THE FARM  8)


    The farm and some ocean front property :wink:


    yep
     8)
    hi spooky  :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Leslie on April 17, 2007, 07:45:40 AM
    Diario
    http://www.diarioaruba.com/
    Amigoe
    http://www.amigoe.com/english/
    BonDia
    http://www.cspnv.com/
    Solo di Pueblo
    http://www.solodipueblo.com/
    Aruba Today
    http://www.arubatoday.com/
    Translator:
    http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: spooky112483 on April 17, 2007, 07:46:03 AM
    hey Robots hope you are well. Rough day today, huh? I'm still trying to sort this shooting out in my head :cry:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: spooky112483 on April 17, 2007, 07:47:02 AM
    and Jossy's editorial rocked!!! Thank God for him!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: spooky112483 on April 17, 2007, 07:49:37 AM
    morning Leslie. Thank you for bringing the papers to us.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: spooky112483 on April 17, 2007, 08:22:08 AM
    God they are showing the victims now :cry:  :cry:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Kimmy53 on April 17, 2007, 08:33:28 AM
    Good Morning Monkeys.

    A sad day for Va Tech and our country.  My prayers go up for those touched by this tragedy. :cry:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 09:01:09 AM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


    Curly hair, yes/no?
    My vote is yes


    Morning Monkeys, just reading through what I missed from last night.
    I was wondering if anyone knows what  Thornton Ratliff                         looks like,  and if it could possibly be him in the pic?

     
    Sometime  between 8:00 and 10:00pm on Sunday, WATSON went into the casino of the hotel and saw JURON VAN DER SLOOT. She went to a change machine and saw VAN DER SLOOT standing near RUTH MCVAY and MADISON WHATLEY  near a blackjack table.  After Watson played some slot machines for a few minutes, she went  to the blackjack table where she had seen her friends. She saw VAN DER SLOOT sitting at the blackjack
    table with classmate THORNTON RATLIFF. VAN DER SLOOT appeared to be betting a lot of money. He also had some kind of small electronic device on the table in front of him that the device was called an "ipod" which was something similar to an mp-3 player. Some of WATSON'S female friends were standing around VAN DER SLOOT while he played, but WATSON does not remember seeing HOLLOWAY there. After a minute or two, WATSON walked into the hotel lobby and saw HOLLOWAY
    coming out of the bathroom and had the above-mentioned conversation.

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~dugo/doc3.pdf


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Peaches on April 17, 2007, 09:19:11 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Angie
    What if this guy starts doing this stuff with young boys?   Him being an adult, I would email him and tell him that you saved the video and he's now on notice that if you ever have any more problems with him...it's gonna be the police at his  door next time.

    What is it with you?  Do you just attract weirdos? (Angie knows what I mean by this and it won't make her mad, trust me.  :wink: )


    If you think this nice boy just got started waving his weinie in cyberspace, I'll bet you would be wrong.  What is he is already sending it to young(er) children?  Ya think?   Believe it when I say this is not the first time.

    Bust him.  Hard.  Don't wanna turn him in?  

    Ted Bundy was "such a nice boy".


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 09:19:12 AM
    Quote from: "spooky112483"
    hey Robots hope you are well. Rough day today, huh? I'm still trying to sort this shooting out in my head :cry:


    yep, me too, very sad  

    if you ask me
    the spin masters are already on it


    they had a shooting there within the past year and bomb scares within 2 weeks
    and the delay in the time from the first to the second shooting
    i dont care i call em like i see em and there are goin to be a lot of people that need to supply some answers

    whats this BS about not being able to ID the body ????

    if they knew it was a "domestic dispute" then they must know who it is


    lots of BS floating around  :x


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 09:27:56 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "spooky112483"
    hey Robots hope you are well. Rough day today, huh? I'm still trying to sort this shooting out in my head :cry:


    yep, me too, very sad  

    if you ask me
    the spin masters are already on it


    they had a shooting there within the past year and bomb scares within 2 weeks
    and the delay in the time from the first to the second shooting
    i dont care i call em like i see em and there are goin to be a lot of people that need to supply some answers

    whats this BS about not being able to ID the body ????

    if they knew it was a "domestic dispute" then they must know who it is


    lots of BS floating around  :x

    They have the name of the shooter but are waiting to make sure before they release his name.

    What bothers me is the time difference between the first shooting and the second.  They assumed it was a murder suicide and that's why they hesitated.

    This pisses me off because that hesitation was fatal.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 17, 2007, 09:45:36 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    O/T - what do you guys think of this for FOM?   :lol:  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/FOMrocket4th.gif)



    k...i had a few drinks last nite...what did i say to deserve this one????


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: SunFreak2 on April 17, 2007, 09:46:27 AM
    Good mormimg Monkeys.  It's a beautiful morning here in Atlanta.  Not so good in VA though.  How horriffic!!

    I dreamed about Joran vd Sloot last night!  It's really weird, but here is the gist of it.  

    He and I were going to the same college in NY.  We were on spring break.  Somehow we both ended up in at Myrtle Beach in SC at the same campgroun/resort.  My father had an RV. Joran stayed in the hotel part of the resort.  Ha Ha!!  He had that skanky blonde from last spring with him.  Somehow I had a motorcycle and a tiny Yorkie.  He kept stealing my motorcycle and going real fast and would wreck my bike, but the bike always ended up not hurt.  His skank girlfriend ripped off a bunch of the hotel rooms.  She took boxes and boxes of stuff from the rooms and said they gave it to her.  I talked to Joran and told him to stop stealing my motorcycle and the skank was with him.  She had a deeply wrinkled face that she tried to conceal with heavy makeup.  Being the blunt person that I am, I said to her," Good God Almighty what happened to your face?  You sure do have some deep wrinkles on your face.  What are you, about 100 years old or did someone throw-up on your neck?"  She walked away.  So I drove thru the parking lot making sure everything worked like it should for the long trip back to NY.  As I drove thru the lot, I saw Joran's dad's jeep filled with the cacca that she had ripped off.  It was even tied to the hood and blocking most of the windshield.  Joran had messed with my breaks and they didn't work right so I got some other guy to fix them for me.  Then I drove thru the lot again laughing at how Joran and the skank looked like the Beverly Hillbillies with all that cacca hanging everywhere on the jeep.  As I drove off I yelled, "I hope you never make it back to NY."

    Then I heard Meredith from the Today show talking about the tragedy in VA.  I had woken up.  I went outside to my little retreat near my waterfall, and sitting there amongst the gloriousness of the dogwoods and my flowers I remembered the dream.  I told myself I have to tell the dream to the monkeys.

    I interpret it to mean that Joran is running away with this skank to avoid facing charges against him for what he did to Natalee.  I guess the college setting was from the tragedy in VA and Mrytle Beach is where we used to have our family reunions at a beautiful resort.  Also, we used to go camping in a travel trailer from when I was in 3rd grade until 12th.

    WEIRD!!!!!  shock:   :shock:    :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 17, 2007, 10:05:47 AM
    ty for sharing the dream....freaky...even 4 a sunfreak :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 11:00:18 AM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"


    Morning Monkeys, just reading through what I missed from last night.
    I was wondering if anyone knows what  Thornton Ratliff                         looks like,  and if it could possibly be him in the pic?

     
    Sometime  between 8:00 and 10:00pm on Sunday, WATSON went into the casino of the hotel and saw JURON VAN DER SLOOT. She went to a change machine and saw VAN DER SLOOT standing near RUTH MCVAY and MADISON WHATLEY  near a blackjack table.  After Watson played some slot machines for a few minutes, she went  to the blackjack table where she had seen her friends. She saw VAN DER SLOOT sitting at the blackjack table with classmate THORNTON RATLIFF. VAN DER SLOOT appeared to be betting a lot of money. He also had some kind of small electronic device on the table in front of him that the device was called an "ipod" which was something similar to an mp-3 player. Some of WATSON'S female friends were standing around VAN DER SLOOT while he played, but WATSON does not remember seeing HOLLOWAY there. After a minute or two, WATSON walked into the hotel lobby and saw HOLLOWAY coming out of the bathroom and had the above-mentioned conversation.

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~dugo/doc3.pdf


    Good morning bleachedblack

    As far as I know Katherine Whatley's statement (302) is the only mention of a classmate named Thornton Ratliff.  However ... according to Katherine (Madison) Whatley (302) when she, Natalee and some of their classmates came to the Black Jack table ... Joran and an "older man" were already there gambling with other classmates.    

    It should be remembered that the Greta/Joran transcript as well as  official witness statements of both Joran and Paulus ... have Paulus leaving the POKER table half way through the tournament for home. This occured prior to Joran going to the BLACK JACK table where the encounter with Natalee and her friends took place.

    Lies are created to cover the truth. Why are Joran and Paulus compelled to cover up a Paulus and Natalee connection?  Beth Twitty was aware that Paulus and Natalee had met at the casino at least six/seven month prior to the revelation of the casino recordings.  I contend her knowledge must have come from Natalee's classmates.

    Janet


    Katherine (Madison) Whatley
    FBI Statement
    July 12, 2005

    After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    September 19, 2005

    HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ..... I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.


    Joran Van der Sloot
    On the Record w/ Greta
    March 1, 2006

    VAN DER SLOOT: .... And yes, so my dad had come with me. And halfway through, he — because my mom at the time was in Holland, halfway through, he had to go back home to my little brother because he was home alone. And I took his place at the poker tournament because I had lost earlier. So I went in and I took his place and I played for him.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 11:11:43 AM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"


    Morning Monkeys, just reading through what I missed from last night.
    I was wondering if anyone knows what  Thornton Ratliff                         looks like,  and if it could possibly be him in the pic?

     
    Sometime  between 8:00 and 10:00pm on Sunday, WATSON went into the casino of the hotel and saw JURON VAN DER SLOOT. She went to a change machine and saw VAN DER SLOOT standing near RUTH MCVAY and MADISON WHATLEY  near a blackjack table.  After Watson played some slot machines for a few minutes, she went  to the blackjack table where she had seen her friends. She saw VAN DER SLOOT sitting at the blackjack table with classmate THORNTON RATLIFF. VAN DER SLOOT appeared to be betting a lot of money. He also had some kind of small electronic device on the table in front of him that the device was called an "ipod" which was something similar to an mp-3 player. Some of WATSON'S female friends were standing around VAN DER SLOOT while he played, but WATSON does not remember seeing HOLLOWAY there. After a minute or two, WATSON walked into the hotel lobby and saw HOLLOWAY coming out of the bathroom and had the above-mentioned conversation.

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~dugo/doc3.pdf


    Good morning bleachedblack

    As far as I know Katherine Whatley's statement (302) is the only mention of a classmate named Thornton Ratliff.  However ... according to Katherine (Madison) Whatley (302) when she, Natalee and some of their classmates came to the Black Jack table ... Joran and an "older man" were already there gambling with other classmates.    

    It should be remembered that the Greta/Joran transcript as well as  official witness statements of both Joran and Paulus ... have Paulus leaving the POKER table half way through the tournament for home. This occured prior to Joran going to the BLACK JACK table where the encounter with Natalee and her friends took place.

    Lies are created to cover the truth. Why are Joran and Paulus compelled to cover up a Paulus and Natalee connection?  Beth Twitty was aware that Paulus and Natalee had met at the casino at least six/seven month prior to the revelation of the casino recordings.  I contend her knowledge must have come from Natalee's classmates.

    Janet


    Katherine (Madison) Whatley
    FBI Statement
    July 12, 2005

    After swimming at the hotel on Sunday, WHATLEY and other classmates, including HOLLOWAY, ate dinner at a restaurant next to the hotel. After dinner they went to the casino at the hotel. A few classmates were gambling at a card table along with an "older man" and YURON VAN DER SLOOT. (Whatley 302)


    Beth Twitty
    'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
    September 19, 2005

    HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ..... I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.


    Joran Van der Sloot
    On the Record w/ Greta
    March 1, 2006

    VAN DER SLOOT: .... And yes, so my dad had come with me. And halfway through, he — because my mom at the time was in Holland, halfway through, he had to go back home to my little brother because he was home alone. And I took his place at the poker tournament because I had lost earlier. So I went in and I took his place and I played for him.


    Edit:

    First sentence of my post ... "As far as I know Katherine Whatley's statement (302) is the only mention of a classmate named Thornton Ratliff."

    It should read ... Nancy Watson ... not Katherine Whatley.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 11:19:23 AM
    Tamikosmom - working and lurking this morning but I wanted mention a couple things  :D

    #1 - I really do love your avatar, it always makes me smile

    #2 - I appreciate your posts with the quotes from articles and statements.  

    Now...back to work  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 17, 2007, 11:45:22 AM
    Quote from: "Tylergal"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Posted by MF at FOB regarding the 10 Dutch investigators:

    Initial reports were that the group came to made their last part of investigation on the case of NH disappearance, but then during the weekend, information also came in that the Team came for the investigation on the Namdar bribery intent on Micheal Williams and Glembert Croes, who acted as MEP members, while they were actually from other party OLA.

    This morning information coming from the Netherlands, denied that the team came exclusively for the NH case and a few moments ago the Minister of Justice indeed confirmed that the Team was for the NH Case in a last intent before closing the case and also for the investigation on the Namdar group. I will get the details on what he said later on.

    In the second investigation, the use of RST is also mentioned.

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DutchTeamAruba.jpg)


    Looking at this picture, it seems that Jacobs has joined them.  Is that him on the right?

    Tgal, no, no that is a group of 4 people :lol:

    morning Monkeys. running to lunch bbl


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 11:47:21 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Tamikosmom - working and lurking this morning but I wanted mention a couple things  :D

    #1 - I really do love your avatar, it always makes me smile

    #2 - I appreciate your posts with the quotes from articles and statements.  

    Now...back to work  :lol:


    Klaas ... I love my avatar too.  The minute you posted it as a choice for the Easter season ... I knew that I was never going to let it go ... Easter or no Easter. I liken that ducky to a security blanket and ... you have to admit that I am the cutest monkey on the forum.   :)  

    Klaas ... I appreciate all the work you do moderating the SM forum and the FP comment section.  I do believe that SM is the only open/public forum that is truly honoring to Natalee and her family.

    Sincerely, Janet


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Peaches on April 17, 2007, 12:07:04 PM
    Quote from: "BTgirl"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    ARUBA - An Island Paradise full of Predatory Parasites

    Put that in your "dance Aruba" commercials!


    Those commercials drive me crazy. There are several reasons for that, but one is that I can only understand about half what they say in that little song. Other than the part about dancing, can you understand what they're saying?  :?


    I understand I have two words for all of them and it ain't "Let's dance!"


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Peaches on April 17, 2007, 12:10:40 PM
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    San, I see the head of the guy you pointed out...may not even be highlighted...could just be the lights overhead....looks like a modern doo.


    Looks like that beach bunny GVC.....he had highlights in his hair.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 12:43:13 PM
    Is Thornton Ratliff in college somewhere?  

    Hi monkeys.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 17, 2007, 01:16:32 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Anna how many puppies have you lost due to this horrendous pet food problem?
    I hope none! And I hope she doesn't lose any.....Men  :roll:


    Yes, I am a born skeptic, I admit it.

    Anyhow, out of the millions of cans of pet food recalled and as poisonous they all were supposed to be, only 4200 pets have died?

    Gee, with the hoohaw going on, I woulda thought it was black plague for pets and wagons should be patrolling the streets just picking up the dead.


    You guys see the CFO of menu food sold his stock before the massive recall?
    http://www.andnetwork.com/index?service=direct/0/Home/story&sp=l283314


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 01:23:58 PM
    Lalas,

    I've been working and lurking, saw you post a little bit ago.
    Do you think Joran had the red jeep out the night of the 29th/30th?
    And if you do think Joran had it out, and if you believe the cops found out prior to June 13th that the jeep had been out in the wee hours of the morning of the 30th, but they ( the cops) by the 13th didn't know yet who had the jeep out, how did the cops know the jeep was out?
    I think it was a GPS transmitter.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Peaches on April 17, 2007, 01:41:14 PM
    As long as Pedigree is okay, I'm good.  

    It is suspicious if the CEO dumped his stock right before this happened.   JERK.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: JusticeforNatalee on April 17, 2007, 01:43:55 PM
    Looks like Jossy has another editorial today referencing Oduber.
    Here's the link but I have no idea what the article states.

    http://www.diario-aruba.com/2007/4/17/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 02:42:08 PM
    you and my daughter look alike with your new outfit on  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 02:42:58 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    I apologize for all the posts on the dog food and will take it to the lounge.  It is just that this is very, very hard to deal with for me.

    Over and out!

    .


    ROGER !
     8)

    understandable  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 17, 2007, 03:03:59 PM
    Anna, 3 times is 3 million times more than anyone should have to go through that. Bil Jac has all domestic ingred.


    My 1st thought was the curly-haired card player could be gvc or a MB'er.

    If gvc, it is very interesting how pvds, jurin and gvc positioned themselves at the table.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Bobo2 on April 17, 2007, 04:07:44 PM
    O/T
    I miss that old ignore button.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 17, 2007, 05:10:57 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)


    Besides just buying a new car and skipping his graduation he also cut short his 3 month internship as a crouper at the casino. Five witnesses came forward saying Guido had deep scratches on his face..Some as long as three inches..He hires the most expensive lawyer in europe and his father goes on record saying he doesnt know Joran Van Der Sloot.. :shock: At the same time his attorney Spong says they are good friends.

    I am still curious why the ALE mentioned Battery and Heavy Battery when they arrested Guido and GVC. They claim they have no evidence.

    Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad reported Monday that Guido W. was doing a three-month internship at the casino in the Marriott Hotel in Aruba when Holloway disappeared.

    The paper cited an employee of the hotel as saying Guido W. left Aruba in June, before his internship was finished, to study in the Netherlands.

    In an interview with Dutch NOS television Sunday, Spong said Aruban authorities suspect his client of "assisting in the murder, battery and kidnapping of Natalee Holloway."

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-05-21-holloway_x.htm


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 05:27:46 PM
    O/T....This is a drive by post, as I realized I made a mistake last night when talking about the school shootings. We were discussing that many of them seem to have occured in April. I said that the Amish school shootings were a year ago....That was wrong. Geesh, that shooting occurred in the fall (they just had the 6 month anniversary a few weeks ago) not a year as I alluded to last night. They opened a new school for the Amish students on the six month anniversary as the old one was torn down after the killings. I will blame my mistake for last night on being too tired to think. (Well, I need some excuse)....The memorial today for Virg. Tech was very sad....OK, sorry for the interruption, back on topic monkeys, see you all later!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: NM on April 17, 2007, 05:37:34 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    After enhancing this photo, it's clear to me anyway that the dealer at the table is NOT Guido:


    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoJoranDealer.jpg)


    Besides just buying a new car and skipping his graduation he also cut short his 3 month internship as a crouper at the casino. Five witnesses came forward saying Guido had deep scratches on his face..Some as long as three inches..He hires the most expensive lawyer in europe and his father goes on record saying he doesnt know Joran Van Der Sloot.. :shock: At the same time his attorney Spong says they are good friends.

    I am still curious why the ALE mentioned Battery and Heavy Battery when they arrested Guido and GVC. They claim they have no evidence.

    Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad reported Monday that Guido W. was doing a three-month internship at the casino in the Marriott Hotel in Aruba when Holloway disappeared.

    The paper cited an employee of the hotel as saying Guido W. left Aruba in June, before his internship was finished, to study in the Netherlands.

    In an interview with Dutch NOS television Sunday, Spong said Aruban authorities suspect his client of "assisting in the murder, battery and kidnapping of Natalee Holloway."

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-05-21-holloway_x.htm


    I double checked the link and the article says Marriott!  Maybe  a typo on their part, or could gah-weed-duh be working at 2 casinos?  hummmm

    Thanks for the article *******!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 17, 2007, 05:51:23 PM
    Yeh..Its a misprint..He worked at the HI.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 17, 2007, 06:12:40 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/CasinoGuy.jpg)


    Curly hair, yes/no?
    My vote is yes


    Morning Monkeys, just reading through what I missed from last night.
    I was wondering if anyone knows what  Thornton Ratliff                         looks like,  and if it could possibly be him in the pic?

     
    Sometime  between 8:00 and 10:00pm on Sunday, WATSON went into the casino of the hotel and saw JURON VAN DER SLOOT. She went to a change machine and saw VAN DER SLOOT standing near RUTH MCVAY and MADISON WHATLEY  near a blackjack table.  After Watson played some slot machines for a few minutes, she went  to the blackjack table where she had seen her friends. She saw VAN DER SLOOT sitting at the blackjack
    table with classmate THORNTON RATLIFF. VAN DER SLOOT appeared to be betting a lot of money. He also had some kind of small electronic device on the table in front of him that the device was called an "ipod" which was something similar to an mp-3 player. Some of WATSON'S female friends were standing around VAN DER SLOOT while he played, but WATSON does not remember seeing HOLLOWAY there. After a minute or two, WATSON walked into the hotel lobby and saw HOLLOWAY
    coming out of the bathroom and had the above-mentioned conversation.

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~dugo/doc3.pdf


    He did say that one of the twins were sitting at the table when he was if that helps.  Hey Forida is cold this time of year!!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 06:19:59 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Lalas,

    I've been working and lurking, saw you post a little bit ago.
    Do you think Joran had the red jeep out the night of the 29th/30th?
    And if you do think Joran had it out, and if you believe the cops found out prior to June 13th that the jeep had been out in the wee hours of the morning of the 30th, but they ( the cops) by the 13th didn't know yet who had the jeep out, how did the cops know the jeep was out?
    I think it was a GPS transmitter.

    Ado


    I believe there was a reason to haul away two vehicles.  If the judge would not allow them to search the house, he certainly would not let them take two vehicles without cause. IMO  Now, I personally don't think they would have had the nerve to put GPS on the vehicle and I do believe Paulus would know if they did.  I think someone spotted the jeep.  Maybe the fishermen only saw the top (white) and thought it was a suzuki top...maybe the two witnesses saw the VDS in the Jeep by McDonalds...


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 17, 2007, 06:23:10 PM
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 06:29:53 PM
    Quote from: "Anna"
    I apologize for all the posts on the dog food and will take it to the lounge.  It is just that this is very, very hard to deal with for me.

    Over and out!

    .


    I for one, am grateful for the posts.  I only have one dog to worry about, I can't imagine the horror of caring for several animals during this time.
    The connection site has voluntary registration.  I can't imagine the number of people that don't even know about the site and haven't registered. The whole situation is so tragic.  You would think there would be more corporate responsibilty in identifying and removing the tainted food. Very skeery.
    If the food contaminates animals in our food chain (which it might), people might sing a different song.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 17, 2007, 06:49:22 PM
    O?T
    LIGHTEN UP GUYS.

     :arrow: I have not been laid in months...do i qualify for sympathy???

    Anna...sorry the pups are not doing well


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 06:52:15 PM
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Lalas,

    I've been working and lurking, saw you post a little bit ago.
    Do you think Joran had the red jeep out the night of the 29th/30th?
    And if you do think Joran had it out, and if you believe the cops found out prior to June 13th that the jeep had been out in the wee hours of the morning of the 30th, but they ( the cops) by the 13th didn't know yet who had the jeep out, how did the cops know the jeep was out?
    I think it was a GPS transmitter.

    Ado


    I believe there was a reason to haul away two vehicles.  If the judge would not allow them to search the house, he certainly would not let them take two vehicles without cause. IMO  Now, I personally don't think they would have had the nerve to put GPS on the vehicle and I do believe Paulus would know if they did.  I think someone spotted the jeep.  Maybe the fishermen only saw the top (white) and thought it was a suzuki top...maybe the two witnesses saw the VDS in the Jeep by McDonalds...


    I don't think any witnesses saw the jeep at MacDonalds. I do think some misdirectors with invetigation inside information threw that rumor out early on after they found out the cops new the jeep was out and about that night. That rumor was that Paulus, Joran and Natalee were seen at McDonalds/ATM around 4 AM in the red jeep. I don't buy that one bit.
    My assumption so far is the narc squad had for a while been montoring Joran and the phone taps weren't to watch Paulus, but instead to keep track of Joran and any drug related activity. If the narcs had the phones tapped they probably also had the VDS vehicles GPS'd. In the 6/13/5 interogations of both of the Kalpos they asked both if Joran knows how to drive a car? They did not ask if Joran had driven or knew how to drive Depaks car. They asked it Joran Knew how to drive. So, they knew the Jeep was out that night, but at that point they didn't know who was driving it. GPS. The 4 AM phone call Paulus finally admitted to may very well have gone something like " Hey I just woke up cause I heard my jeep start and I saw you drive away in it, what the f_ck are you up to?"

    Anyway, that's my take on it so far. If anyone has any facts that can override my theory, let me know.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 06:53:09 PM
    CARNUT - Take it to the Monkey Lounge.  This is my last request.  I'm trying to work and can't babysit the forum at the moment.  If you don't like discussion about PET'S AND PET FOOD, or any other OFF TOPIC thing that happens to pop up, just please SCROLL PAST THE POST.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 06:57:24 PM
    adoronron

    Could be, but I believe Paulus got chastized because two witnesses saw him and his phone was tapped.  They very well could have known the jeep was out, as you say.  It makes sense. I'm open to anything. All I feel certain of, is that there had to be cause to tow the vehicles.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 07:05:11 PM
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    O?T
    LIGHTEN UP GUYS.

     :arrow: I have not been laid in months...do i qualify for sympathy???

    Anna...sorry the pups are not doing well




     :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: friend of monkeys on April 17, 2007, 07:06:54 PM
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 07:07:05 PM
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    adoronron

    Could be, but I believe Paulus got chastized because two witnesses saw him and his phone was tapped.  They very well could have known the jeep was out, as you say.  It makes sense. I'm open to anything. All I feel certain of, is that there had to be cause to tow the vehicles.


    Buckeye,
    My problem with the witnesses is if they are up at 4 AM, they'd probably been drinking quite a bit, it was dark, and I doubt their account.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 17, 2007, 07:11:29 PM
    Golly it's been tense in the monkey cage today!  :shock:

    Anyone want to hold hands and sing Kumbaya?  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: casa on April 17, 2007, 07:13:44 PM
    Quote from: "Carnut"
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    Sure do wish I could respond.


    I would love to continue this conversation with you in the lounge.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 07:14:55 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    adoronron

    Could be, but I believe Paulus got chastized because two witnesses saw him and his phone was tapped.  They very well could have known the jeep was out, as you say.  It makes sense. I'm open to anything. All I feel certain of, is that there had to be cause to tow the vehicles.


    Buckeye,
    My problem with the witnesses is if they are up at 4 AM, they'd probably been drinking quite a bit, it was dark, and I doubt their account.

    Ado


    For all I know, they could be bakers, morning shift people, fishermen, security guards.  Lots of people can be up at 4am.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AnnieMW1 on April 17, 2007, 07:17:45 PM
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    I LAUGHED!!!   :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 07:20:34 PM
    Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    I LAUGHED!!!   :lol:


    I didn't laugh because........
              "months" is nothing........... :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AnnieMW1 on April 17, 2007, 07:21:33 PM
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    I LAUGHED!!!   :lol:


    I didn't laugh because........
              "months" is nothing........... :wink:


    Guess you're married, eh?   :roll:  :roll:  :lol:  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 07:28:01 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Lalas,

    I've been working and lurking, saw you post a little bit ago.
    Do you think Joran had the red jeep out the night of the 29th/30th?
    And if you do think Joran had it out, and if you believe the cops found out prior to June 13th that the jeep had been out in the wee hours of the morning of the 30th, but they ( the cops) by the 13th didn't know yet who had the jeep out, how did the cops know the jeep was out?
    I think it was a GPS transmitter.

    Ado


    I believe there was a reason to haul away two vehicles.  If the judge would not allow them to search the house, he certainly would not let them take two vehicles without cause. IMO  Now, I personally don't think they would have had the nerve to put GPS on the vehicle and I do believe Paulus would know if they did.  I think someone spotted the jeep.  Maybe the fishermen only saw the top (white) and thought it was a suzuki top...maybe the two witnesses saw the VDS in the Jeep by McDonalds...


    I don't think any witnesses saw the jeep at MacDonalds. I do think some misdirectors with invetigation inside information threw that rumor out early on after they found out the cops new the jeep was out and about that night. That rumor was that Paulus, Joran and Natalee were seen at McDonalds/ATM around 4 AM in the red jeep. I don't buy that one bit.
    My assumption so far is the narc squad had for a while been montoring Joran and the phone taps weren't to watch Paulus, but instead to keep track of Joran and any drug related activity. If the narcs had the phones tapped they probably also had the VDS vehicles GPS'd. In the 6/13/5 interogations of both of the Kalpos they asked both if Joran knows how to drive a car? They did not ask if Joran had driven or knew how to drive Depaks car. They asked it Joran Knew how to drive. So, they knew the Jeep was out that night, but at that point they didn't know who was driving it. GPS. The 4 AM phone call Paulus finally admitted to may very well have gone something like " Hey I just woke up cause I heard my jeep start and I saw you drive away in it, what the f_ck are you up to?"

    Anyway, that's my take on it so far. If anyone has any facts that can override my theory, let me know.

    I agree that if Natalee was in any Jeep she was not alive.  If Paulus was indeed out at that time of night he was with Joran to temporarily dispose of Natalee because she died at the Van der Sloot residence.  

    I agree about Joran driving.  He in fact did know how to drive and they knew he did because he probably has been caught once or twice and daddy fixed that for him.

    I agree about them possibly monitoring Joran's activities.  I think he was into drugs big time.

    I don't remember a 4 am phone call.  I remember someone heard Paulus say he picked Joran and Natalee up at 4 am.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    I also believe that Paulus was well aware of Joran's routine of drugging, rapping tourist girls because this is not the first time he has taken them to his house.  Anita maid it known that Joran took girls home all the time.  Why would she feel the need to share that with us.  Because she knew he had done it 20 times before.  JMO.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 07:29:55 PM
    Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    I LAUGHED!!!   :lol:

    Hi Annie nice to see you.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: AnnieMW1 on April 17, 2007, 07:31:36 PM
    And you San...I see you're still on the J*O*B!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 07:37:28 PM
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    LOL you're sure to get alittle action in that string thing FOM.  :D  :D  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 07:38:27 PM
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    O?T
    LIGHTEN UP GUYS.

     :arrow: I have not been laid in months...do i qualify for sympathy???

    Anna...sorry the pups are not doing well


    Sorry this is the post that was cracking me up! :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 07:38:28 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
    hoping someone would laugh....

    Klass..i can babysit :shock:


    LOL you're sure to get alittle action in that string thing FOM.  :D  :D  :shock:



     :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 07:39:27 PM
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 07:40:30 PM
    Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
    And you San...I see you're still on the J*O*B!


    Yes I am. :D


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 07:42:25 PM
    FYI - I've split some posts from this thread and moved them to the Monkey Lounge.  I don't have time to continue doing that, so any more of those posts will be deleted in the future.  You know which ones I'm referring to.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 07:43:28 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?


    Yep - she and her daughter are at DisneyWorld!  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 07:51:05 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?


    Yep - she and her daughter are at DisneyWorld!  :lol:


    Hmmmmm , Disney World, fun! Similar to being in Aruba....can't tell fact from fantasy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 07:52:17 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Lalas,

    I've been working and lurking, saw you post a little bit ago.
    Do you think Joran had the red jeep out the night of the 29th/30th?
    And if you do think Joran had it out, and if you believe the cops found out prior to June 13th that the jeep had been out in the wee hours of the morning of the 30th, but they ( the cops) by the 13th didn't know yet who had the jeep out, how did the cops know the jeep was out?
    I think it was a GPS transmitter.

    Ado


    I believe there was a reason to haul away two vehicles.  If the judge would not allow them to search the house, he certainly would not let them take two vehicles without cause. IMO  Now, I personally don't think they would have had the nerve to put GPS on the vehicle and I do believe Paulus would know if they did.  I think someone spotted the jeep.  Maybe the fishermen only saw the top (white) and thought it was a suzuki top...maybe the two witnesses saw the VDS in the Jeep by McDonalds...


    I don't think any witnesses saw the jeep at MacDonalds. I do think some misdirectors with invetigation inside information threw that rumor out early on after they found out the cops new the jeep was out and about that night. That rumor was that Paulus, Joran and Natalee were seen at McDonalds/ATM around 4 AM in the red jeep. I don't buy that one bit.
    My assumption so far is the narc squad had for a while been montoring Joran and the phone taps weren't to watch Paulus, but instead to keep track of Joran and any drug related activity. If the narcs had the phones tapped they probably also had the VDS vehicles GPS'd. In the 6/13/5 interogations of both of the Kalpos they asked both if Joran knows how to drive a car? They did not ask if Joran had driven or knew how to drive Depaks car. They asked it Joran Knew how to drive. So, they knew the Jeep was out that night, but at that point they didn't know who was driving it. GPS. The 4 AM phone call Paulus finally admitted to may very well have gone something like " Hey I just woke up cause I heard my jeep start and I saw you drive away in it, what the f_ck are you up to?"

    Anyway, that's my take on it so far. If anyone has any facts that can override my theory, let me know.

    I agree that if Natalee was in any Jeep she was not alive.  If Paulus was indeed out at that time of night he was with Joran to temporarily dispose of Natalee because she died at the Van der Sloot residence.  

    I agree about Joran driving.  He in fact did know how to drive and they knew he did because he probably has been caught once or twice and daddy fixed that for him.

    I agree about them possibly monitoring Joran's activities.  I think he was into drugs big time.

    I don't remember a 4 am phone call.  I remember someone heard Paulus say he picked Joran and Natalee up at 4 am.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    I also believe that Paulus was well aware of Joran's routine of drugging, rapping tourist girls because this is not the first time he has taken them to his house.  Anita maid it known that Joran took girls home all the time.  Why would she feel the need to share that with us.  Because she knew he had done it 20 times before.  JMO.


    I think that during the scene in front of his house with the Holloway's, Paulus was not yet aware of any incident with Natalee. I also think when during that scene he said that he had picked up Joran at 4 he may have been distracted was thinking fast and got his facts confused. There he is with a situation that is going from bad to worse with several tense conversations going of, accusations thrown every which way and he's thinking "I picked him up at 11 but now I wonder what he was really doing at 4 when I called him" and somehow in the confusion of the moment he said 4 AM. An alternate theory would be he knew Joran had taken the jeep around 4 AM and maybe he figured that someone might have seen the Jeep out and he didn't want anyone to know Joran was out alone so he said "I picked him up at 4".

    I base this all on the assumption that during the morning scene, Paulus had not seen nor heard anyhing about her since he had perhaps seen here at the casino.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 08:03:29 PM
    adoronron

    Quote
    I think that during the scene in front of his house with the Holloway's, Paulus was not yet aware of any incident with Natalee. I also think when during that scene he said that he had picked up Joran at 4 he may have been distracted was thinking fast and got his facts confused. There he is with a situation that is going from bad to worse with several tense conversations going of, accusations thrown every which way and he's thinking "I picked him up at 11 but now I wonder what he was really doing at 4 when I called him" and somehow in the confusion of the moment he said 4 AM. An alternate theory would be he knew Joran had taken the jeep around 4 AM and maybe he figured that someone might have seen the Jeep out and he didn't want anyone to know Joran was out alone so he said "I picked him up at 4".


    I disagree with your comment adoronron and here is why. From what we have heard from Charles Croes, CC , his friend , and the kid from the beach had already been to Sloots house. While they were there, one reportedly climbed the fence(I do believe this occured) and saw DK's  car there, copied the plate number , and they then left to go and meet the posse at the police station. Sloots had at least 1 huge dog which would undoubtedly have caused a ruckus. Who knows for sure what other warning Sloot may have received. As we know when the posse then returned with the cops, DK's car was no longer in the Sloot compound.
    Perhaps 60 min had lapsed but I feel this was enough time for Paul to line up his story----whatever inconsistencies he made were simply because they were lies.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: BTgirl on April 17, 2007, 08:03:54 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?


    Yep - she and her daughter are at DisneyWorld!  :lol:


    Hmmmmm , Disney World, fun! Similar to being in Aruba....can't tell fact from fantasy.


    Yeah, except people generally leave Disney World alive.  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 17, 2007, 08:10:01 PM
    Don't forget that Fred Golba ran into Paulus early one morning on that dirt road that goes from the Sand Dunes to the Church :shock: . Paulus was in the red jeep.

    What was Paulus doing out there so early in the morning? Well he probably heard from his buddies they were searching there the next day. Art had found the belt the day before.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 08:15:05 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "San"

    I agree that if Natalee was in any Jeep she was not alive.  If Paulus was indeed out at that time of night he was with Joran to temporarily dispose of Natalee because she died at the Van der Sloot residence.  

    I agree about Joran driving.  He in fact did know how to drive and they knew he did because he probably has been caught once or twice and daddy fixed that for him.

    I agree about them possibly monitoring Joran's activities.  I think he was into drugs big time.

    I don't remember a 4 am phone call.  I remember someone heard Paulus say he picked Joran and Natalee up at 4 am.  Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    I also believe that Paulus was well aware of Joran's routine of drugging, rapping tourist girls because this is not the first time he has taken them to his house.  Anita maid it known that Joran took girls home all the time.  Why would she feel the need to share that with us.  Because she knew he had done it 20 times before.  JMO.

    I think that during the scene in front of his house with the Holloway's, Paulus was not yet aware of any incident with Natalee. I also think when during that scene he said that he had picked up Joran at 4 he may have been distracted was thinking fast and got his facts confused. There he is with a situation that is going from bad to worse with several tense conversations going of, accusations thrown every which way and he's thinking "I picked him up at 11 but now I wonder what he was really doing at 4 when I called him" and somehow in the confusion of the moment he said 4 AM. An alternate theory would be he knew Joran had taken the jeep around 4 AM and maybe he figured that someone might have seen the Jeep out and he didn't want anyone to know Joran was out alone so he said "I picked him up at 4".

    I base this all on the assumption that during the morning scene, Paulus had not seen nor heard anyhing about her since he had perhaps seen here at the casino.

    Ado

    I think that Paulus knew exactly what happened that night.  I also think Joran was hiding in the house when the Holloway/Twittys arrived.  It took Paulus too long to answer the door that night and I don't believe he was sleeping.  If I hear the cops in front of my house at night you can bet I would be answering the door quickly and I wouldn't have my cell phone in my hand ready to call Joran.

    Paulus plan did not work out because Beth arrived too fast.  His plan was not finalized.  JMO.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 08:17:47 PM
    BT You're right about that!  :wink:

    Interesting comment by Art Wood posted at BFN, was actually looking for the pic of the sloots huge dog looking over the fence in their yard. But this is an access to car's that JVDS had, and possibly used that night. Art Woods answer is in red.

    Does the dealership that Lorenzo Van Rijn is involved in just sell cars or do they rent cars as well? Does Lorenzo have access to the inventory?The dealership that Lorenzo was involved in was sold in August  2005.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 08:20:06 PM
    Quote from: "*******"
    Don't forget that Fred Golba ran into Paulus early one morning on that dirt road that goes from the Sand Dunes to the Church :shock: . Paulus was in the red jeep.

    What was Paulus doing out there so early in the morning? Well he probably heard from his buddies they were searching there the next day. Art had found the belt the day before.


    I don't know alot about this sighting, but I think that road also goes to the Tierra Del Sol Golf Course.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 17, 2007, 08:25:17 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?


    Yep - she and her daughter are at DisneyWorld!  :lol:


    Hmmmmm , Disney World, fun! Similar to being in Aruba....can't tell fact from fantasy.


    No Bleached , I love Disney World , a different kind of fantasy and you know from the start it is fantasy.Not like Aruba.

    Hotshot we were there 2 weeks ago and it was hotter than blue blazes. I hope you are having a wonderful time. My favorite ride in Magic Kingdom was Peter Pans flight. Reminded me of Dihanna. LOL


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 08:26:41 PM
    adoro

    The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/page/23/


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 17, 2007, 08:28:54 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    BT You're right about that!  :wink:

    Interesting comment by Art Wood posted at BFN, was actually looking for the pic of the sloots huge dog looking over the fence in their yard. But this is an access to car's that JVDS had, and possibly used that night. Art Woods answer is in red.

    Does the dealership that Lorenzo Van Rijn is involved in just sell cars or do they rent cars as well? Does Lorenzo have access to the inventory?The dealership that Lorenzo was involved in was sold in August  2005.


    Sure was alot of rentals in the Aruba-Bay videos wasnt there? APB out for the white toyota rental as well?

    We know Joran killed one of his dog's in the past..Was another one slaughtered on that bloody mattress? I know we have alot of animals lovers here..It takes a sick sick person to kill a helpless animal let alone your own pet..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 08:29:41 PM
    Quote from: "Sam"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?


    Yep - she and her daughter are at DisneyWorld!  :lol:


    Hmmmmm , Disney World, fun! Similar to being in Aruba....can't tell fact from fantasy.


    No Bleached , I love Disney World , a different kind of fantasy and you know from the start it is fantasy.Not like Aruba.

    Hotshot we were there 2 weeks ago and it was hotter than blue blazes. I hope you are having a wonderful time. My favorite ride in Magic Kingdom was Peter Pans flight. Reminded me of Dihanna. LOL


    I've never been there, but I've always wanted to go!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 08:33:49 PM
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    adoro

    The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/page/23/


    Buckeye,
    I have some stuff to do for next half hour, but will get back to you on this.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 17, 2007, 08:34:02 PM
    I forgot to say Hi monkeys.  :oops:

    Also mispelled Dihannah 1. :oops:

    Wow that is interesting about Lorenzo's dealership.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:36:43 PM
    The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”



    amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:38:24 PM
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach




     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 08:40:09 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach




     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:40:40 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach




     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?



    EXACTLY


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:41:36 PM
    paulus says in a  DECLARATION that he picked joran and Natalee up ??


    where did this all come from


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 08:43:16 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    paulus says in a  DECLARATION that he picked joran and Natalee up ??


    where did this all come from

    Robots - it was part of the evidence that was produced during PVDS court case for damages.  That's one of the reasons he lost.  This was the first we heard that there were actually tapped phone conversations in the dossier.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:45:04 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    paulus says in a  DECLARATION that he picked joran and Natalee up ??


    where did this all come from

    Robots - it was part of the evidence that was produced during PVDS court case for damages.  That's one of the reasons he lost.  This was the first we heard that there were actually tapped phone conversations in the dossier.


    ohh yeaaaaaaaaa


    i guess all the rain has gotten to me

    been running around like crazy...need sleep

    thanks
    klass

    but lets see the WHOLE DECLARATION .....dont you want to see it

    i sure do  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:45:47 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    paulus says in a  DECLARATION that he picked joran and Natalee up ??


    where did this all come from

    Robots - it was part of the evidence that was produced during PVDS court case for damages.  That's one of the reasons he lost.  This was the first we heard that there were actually tapped phone conversations in the dossier.



    evil webs


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:46:50 PM
    this little tidbit never seemed to make on the GRETA show  :roll:




     :x


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Sam on April 17, 2007, 08:49:27 PM
    Yes Robots we all want to see it as well as all the info and evidence we have not seen. JMHO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 08:51:45 PM
    I had posted this at BFN back on june 6,2006. What I find interesting about this womans writing now is that she references the lighthouse. Maybe Paulus was headed to a whore house. I have always felt he might have possible connections to such activities apart from being a patron.

    ++++++++++++++


    IP: Logged
    Posted: 08/22 2:22p My heart aches for Natalee and her family. I've known from the minute Natalee was announced missing on the tv, exactly what happened to her. I have been in touch with the FBI, and they have my statement. I have been to Aruba 3 times, and the last time was HORRIBLE. In 1996, I went with my husband and 4 friends. We stayed at the same hotel Natalee stayed at. My husband and I were both drugged, taken from the hotel casino. My husband was locked in a back room of the bar The Rio Grande, I was taken out to the desert, and didnt come out of the black out until the next morning. I had been raped and beaten. I was fortunate enough to talk my way out of the situation, promising I wouldnt go to the police. When I got back to my hotel, my husband and a friend did go to the police station..........it is just like you've seen on the tv for the Holloway-Twitty family. They did NOTHING to help us at all. Even with the police knowing, that the casino-workers and the Commishioner of the casino had a problem with the "man", and were also willing to help my husband and I.
    We switched hotels that day, and stayed in most of the time we were there. The night before we were to leave all 6 of us decided to go to the beach. That "man" showed up. My husband and cousin got a hold of him, we asked a hotel worker to call the police (they took almost an hour to get there). We told them what had happened and they simply put him in the back of the police jeep uncuffed, and drove away with him. I guess we were all in shock, my husband and I just glad to be leaving both alive.
    They have never mentioned on the news the brothel out in the desert behind the Holiday Inn pass the light house, thats were I was taken to, a police-woman told me that it was a Whore-House, no big deal??
    I have tried to get in touch with the Beth Holloway, I think I could maybe help her or at least tell her that Natalee didnt feel any pain, as I said I was drugged and I dont remember anything until the next day. A lot of parents are now coming on tv again with the same situations of missing children from all islands, but none have gotten any justice or even an answer. It seems I am the only one to have survived. I pray for Natalee and her family every morning and every night, and badly wish there was a way to comfort her mom, who has been, and has had to be, a very strong woman. My husband had to only endure a couple hours of not knowing if I was alive or what happened. He said he cant imagine how they feel. So our hearts and prayers are with them daily. I hope this all ends soon for them, no mother should have to be put through this.
    I havent been able to talk about what happened to me for 9 years, but I would do ANYTHING to help Natalee and her family.
    A.Cormie


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Buckeye on April 17, 2007, 08:53:55 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach




     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?


    And are they sure it was a pick up or was it a drop off?? or attempted drop off...but they were seen??


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:57:14 PM
    the 4 oclock PICK UP


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 08:57:52 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    the 4 oclock PICK UP


    THEN

    the DROP OFF -------the body


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 08:58:32 PM
    The name at the bottom of the post should read A. Cormier.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 09:03:08 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    The name at the bottom of the post should read A. Cormier.

    Can you think of any buildings in that area that look like a brothel?  Aren't those more expensive homes up by the Lighthouse area?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 09:05:43 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach


     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?

    In my opinion - near death, probably comatose. If this pick even happened, which I don't think really did.  
    JMO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 09:06:44 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach


     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?

    In my opinion - near death, probably comatose. If this pick even happened, which I don't think really did.  
    JMO



    you think more lies by the sloooooooots


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 09:07:50 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach


     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?

    In my opinion - near death, probably comatose. If this pick even happened, which I don't think really did.  
    JMO

    I agree about the near death part.  The question is then, if the pickup didn't happen, why did PVDS tell someone it did?  What would be his reason to say he picked them up?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 17, 2007, 09:09:48 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach


     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?

    In my opinion - near death, probably comatose. If this pick even happened, which I don't think really did.  
    JMO

    I agree about the near death part.  The question is then, if the pickup didn't happen, why did PVDS tell someone it did?  What would be his reason to say he picked them up?



    i think he did and her regrets opening his FAT MOUTH

    not because he cares but because it made his lose money

    i cant stand him and his UGLY GREASY hair

    Grossssssssssssssssssssssssssssss 8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 09:11:04 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    BT You're right about that!  :wink:

    Interesting comment by Art Wood posted at BFN, was actually looking for the pic of the sloots huge dog looking over the fence in their yard. But this is an access to car's that JVDS had, and possibly used that night. Art Woods answer is in red.

    Does the dealership that Lorenzo Van Rijn is involved in just sell cars or do they rent cars as well? Does Lorenzo have access to the inventory?The dealership that Lorenzo was involved in was sold in August  2005.


    for shizzle???  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 09:13:18 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    this little tidbit never seemed to make on the GRETA show  :roll:




    Forgot to say HI monkeys!

    And Robots, that's correct. Isn't that interesting? :x


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 09:14:08 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    this little tidbit never seemed to make on the GRETA show  :roll:

     :x

    None of the good questions EVER make it on the Greta show. She doesn't want to ask the tough questions because that takes away from her deal with the VanDerSloots for the first right to an exclusive interview with any future turns in the case.  
    Among the TV journalists, IMO, Greta is the ultimate 'Carney-Barker'. She just needs a sideshow to link up with.  JMO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 09:19:55 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach


     :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

    The question is what condition was Natalee in when PVDS picked them up?

    In my opinion - near death, probably comatose. If this pick even happened, which I don't think really did.  
    JMO

    I agree about the near death part.  The question is then, if the pickup didn't happen, why did PVDS tell someone it did?  What would be his reason to say he picked them up?

    I think it was to put him away from the crime scene, takes him off his property for that period of time. And maybe he was but I don't think it was to pick up Natalee and anyone else.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 09:23:15 PM
    Quote from: "robots"
    paulus says in a  DECLARATION that he picked joran and Natalee up ??


    where did this all come from


    rpbpts ... Michelle posted a blog on her Aruba Boycott site that pertains to this topic.

    Janet

    http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html

    PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT'S DETAINMENT JUSTIFIED


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 09:34:20 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "robots"
    this little tidbit never seemed to make on the GRETA show  :roll:



    Forgot to say HI monkeys!

    And Robots, that's correct. Isn't that interesting? :x

    Hi Mishy


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 09:34:43 PM
    Evening Monkeys.   Anyone want to help clean tonight?  I think the cage is a bit messy tonight.

    Ado
    Sorry I didn't answer your questions right away.  I had some things to do and haven't been able to get back with you until now.  The only reason for Paulus to admit to picking up Joran and Natalee at 4 AM would be:

    1. Paulus knew that Joran was the one driving the jeep and he had been confronted with the evidence of such.  He had to justify a witness seeing him. Paulus had seen this witness statement and he was trying to fit him into the scene in order to be able to claim that Natalee was still alive at 4 AM that morning.

    2. Paulus really was picking Joran up at 4 AM.  Joran had made the call and told daddy what had happened.  K2 left him with a passed out Natalee and Paulus picked him up along with Natalee's body.  Something needed to be done with her until he could arrange things and get his thoughts together.  

    3. Joran left with a passed out Natalee in the jeep around 2 that morning.  He was going to leave her on the beach as had been done before. Paulus had heard that someone saw Joran and he was trying to explain it all away.  Maybe by claiming that Joran was driving, but he was in the car with him.  

    4. Paulus was driving with Joran and they had Natalee in the back.  They were going to withdraw money from the ATM in order to pay someone to take care of her.  They were paying someone to bury her at the Fisherman's huts.  Then Joran was to say Deepak claims he went back and killed her.  


    If you read the statements we have and the things we know from other sources and even Shango.  You have the same thing.  Joran was out at 4 AM doing something. Paulus knew what had happened before Beth and Co. arrived at his gate.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 09:37:56 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Buckeye"
    adoro

    The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/page/23/


    Buckeye,
    I have some stuff to do for next half hour, but will get back to you on this.


    Buckeye,
    I'm back from what I was doing.
    As I recall the tapped information was a taped phone call made around 4 AM on the 30th. No where that I have found is there a court statemet that says Paulus was a participant in the call. But, I do agree the court mentions a tapped call. I believe there was a call.
    "his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn,". I think when Paulus made that declaration, he was not telling the truth. He never took Joran and Natalee to the HI. Another thing about this declaration is I haven't been able to find out the date he made it. I think it was another lie to cover up for an earlier lie. Oh they caught me in a lie, I'll just tell another and if they catch me in that lie I'll tell another because in our form of justice it is allowed to lie.
    "two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance" I'd like to ask the Aruban court what two people, what contact and when?

    I don't want to come off here like I'm arguing,  but rather as debating.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 09:44:42 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Evening Monkeys.   Anyone want to help clean tonight?  I think the cage is a bit messy tonight.

    Ado
    Sorry I didn't answer your questions right away.  I had some things to do and haven't been able to get back with you until now.  The only reason for Paulus to admit to picking up Joran and Natalee at 4 AM would be:

    1. Paulus knew that Joran was the one driving the jeep and he had been confronted with the evidence of such.  He had to justify a witness seeing him. Paulus had seen this witness statement and he was trying to fit him into the scene in order to be able to claim that Natalee was still alive at 4 AM that morning.

    2. Paulus really was picking Joran up at 4 AM.  Joran had made the call and told daddy what had happened.  K2 left him with a passed out Natalee and Paulus picked him up along with Natalee's body.  Something needed to be done with her until he could arrange things and get his thoughts together.  

    3. Joran left with a passed out Natalee in the jeep around 2 that morning.  He was going to leave her on the beach as had been done before. Paulus had heard that someone saw Joran and he was trying to explain it all away.  Maybe by claiming that Joran was driving, but he was in the car with him.  

    4. Paulus was driving with Joran and they had Natalee in the back.  They were going to withdraw money from the ATM in order to pay someone to take care of her.  They were paying someone to bury her at the Fisherman's huts.  Then Joran was to say Deepak claims he went back and killed her.  


    If you read the statements we have and the things we know from other sources and even Shango.  You have the same thing.  Joran was out at 4 AM doing something. Paulus knew what had happened before Beth and Co. arrived at his gate.

    Hiya Lala's
    I think it went down like this.
    The PervBoys took a passed out Natalee back to the VanDerSloot compound, they did their  perverse - sexually disgusting rape - and filming routine and somewhere in the process they noticed this victim wasn't responsive.
    They panicked, everyone left and Paulus was called in. He took control at that point in desposing of Natalee.  
    JMO


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: justinsmama on April 17, 2007, 09:45:58 PM
    For what is worth, I believe that the terrible trio took Natalee straight to the Sloot compound. Paulus was not only there, he participated in the rape. She may well have been on that property when Beth first arrived.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 09:47:41 PM
    Ado
    I don't think I am understanding what you are saying.  Sorry.  You will have to spit it out a bit clearer for me.  Are you saying the 4 AM story was made up as well?  Are you saying there were no witnesses.  I am confused and would like more clarification, please.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 09:49:05 PM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 17, 2007, 09:49:56 PM
    Don't forget the junior pimp in training,Val.I think GVC and Guido were there,also.KJ listed the perps,but couldn't make the charges stick.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 09:52:17 PM
    Quote from: "justinsmama"
    For what is worth, I believe that the terrible trio took Natalee straight to the Sloot compound. Paulus was not only there, he participated in the rape. She may well have been on that property when Beth first arrived.


      I have to agree with you Justins.
     I do recall the interview on TV with Beth and Greta at the Sloots. The very one where PVDs got up from it to answer the phone and left Anita sit there all by herself.  Makes one wonder why.. he is in a middle of interview on TV and he leaves to get the phone?   :roll:
    Beth said she felt Natalee was there.. perhaps not her EXACT words.. but something like that.

     Evening folks.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 09:52:21 PM
    Hi Indy!
     I agree she was taken to the Sloots.  I am just not certain about whether it was right off the bat from CnC or if they really did drive around the lighthouse. The fact that Joran said they didn't go in tell me they did.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 09:53:02 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "robots"
    this little tidbit never seemed to make on the GRETA show  :roll:



    Forgot to say HI monkeys!

    And Robots, that's correct. Isn't that interesting? :x

    Hi Mishy


    Hi IndyDan!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 09:53:52 PM
    Quote from: "Tiger"
    Don't forget the junior pimp in training,Val.I think GVC and Guido were there,also.KJ listed the perps,but couldn't make the charges stick.


      Tiger.. do you think VAL was there too?   :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 09:53:57 PM
    Tiger, do you think Val was there?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 09:55:07 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Tiger, do you think Val was there?


      LOL Mishy.. owe me a coke  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 09:55:07 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    The name at the bottom of the post should read A. Cormier.

    Can you think of any buildings in that area that look like a brothel?  Aren't those more expensive homes up by the Lighthouse area?


    You are right there, are alot of new homes which are being built or have recently been built,which are expensive. You don't have to travel to far south though to start and run into less affluent. I wonder if it is possible they use a more luxurious place as to attract the "big spenders" on the north end?  I know San Nicholas has it's  own, maybe the affluent have better digs? Maybe that's Paulus angle? I can even think up a slogan for his business
    " Better Digs for Bigger Pigs" 8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 09:56:43 PM
    Quote from: "justinsmama"
    For what is worth, I believe that the terrible trio took Natalee straight to the Sloot compound. Paulus was not only there, he participated in the rape. She may well have been on that property when Beth first arrived.

    That's not a stretch to my theory.  The more we're enlightened the more we learn that no one is beyond reproach.  This place called Aruba is the ultimate Sodom and Gomorrah.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: IndyDan on April 17, 2007, 10:00:52 PM
    Ok, time to check out. It was my Birthday today and I'm needing to crash from too much 'celebration'.
    Catchyall in the AM. Thanks for letting me vent.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 10:02:14 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    The name at the bottom of the post should read A. Cormier.

    Can you think of any buildings in that area that look like a brothel?  Aren't those more expensive homes up by the Lighthouse area?


    You are right there, are alot of new homes which are being built or have recently been built,which are expensive. You don't have to travel to far south though to start and run into less affluent. I wonder if it is possible they use a more luxurious place as to attract the "big spenders" on the north end?  I know San Nicholas has it's  own, maybe the affluent have better digs? Maybe that's Paulus angle? I can even think up a slogan for his business
    " Better Digs for Bigger Pigs" 8)

    Yep, very possible but then would A. Cormier have called it a "brothel"?  That's where I get confused.  Seems like a "brothel" wouldn't be one of those nicer homes.  I do see your point about the big spenders and the nicer homes though.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 10:03:04 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Ok, time to check out. It was my Birthday today and I'm needing to crash from too much 'celebration'.
    Catchyall in the AM. Thanks for letting me vent.


    HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!   Hope you had a great day!  See you tomorrow!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:03:08 PM
    Quote from: "IndyDan"
    Ok, time to check out. It was my Birthday today and I'm needing to crash from too much 'celebration'.
    Catchyall in the AM. Thanks for letting me vent.




    Aweeeeeeeeeee  Happy Birthday INDY!

    (http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/47.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:06:56 PM
    HAPPY BIRTHDAY INDYDAN!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 10:07:53 PM
    Wonder what the Aruba hotel is? Add looks shakey. Only 21+ I'll have to look around. Must be a strip club.....

    (http://www.lvexperimental.org/axis.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:08:30 PM
    Hello Monkeys  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 10:09:27 PM
    False alarm....it's in Las Vegas  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 10:09:56 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    I don't think I am understanding what you are saying.  Sorry.  You will have to spit it out a bit clearer for me.  Are you saying the 4 AM story was made up as well?  Are you saying there were no witnesses.  I am confused and would like more clarification, please.


    Lala's
    I'm saying that Paulus lied when he told the court (or an investigator or the prosecutor of who ever), that he had picked up Joran and Natalee.

    I am questioning the validity of the witness statements. The ones who said they saw Joran, Paulus, and Nat at the ATM at 4 AM.

    All the way along there have been convient witnesses to validate lies and tales. The last statement I know of that Paulus made to the officals in this case is "I took Joran and Natalee to the HI".
    I think it isn't the truth, just another lie until it is found to be a lie and then he will dream up another.

    The court statement of the tapped phone call does not indicate who was on the phone call.

    I'm just throwing out some of my opinions. And I do appreciate the challenges to those opinions. Makes me go back and review the case information.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:10:27 PM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Hello Monkeys  :)


     Hey almost neighbor  :) How are you?
     I made a thread for INDY in the Lounge.  
    Its nice to know when its someones BDAY..lol


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 10:10:39 PM
    Happy Birthday Indy.

    Howdy Elaine.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:14:57 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Hello Monkeys  :)


     Hey almost neighbor  :) How are you?
     I made a thread for INDY in the Lounge.  
    Its nice to know when its someones BDAY..lol
    Cool!...Hi Angie, great here and hope that you are feeling much better!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:16:46 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Happy Birthday Indy.

    Howdy Elaine.
    Hi BB!! Hi Klaas, ado and any other lurking monkeys!! I saw where Anniew  was here today too!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:17:27 PM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    Hello Monkeys  :)


     Hey almost neighbor  :) How are you?
     I made a thread for INDY in the Lounge.  
    Its nice to know when its someones BDAY..lol
    Cool!...Hi Angie, great here and hope that you are feeling much better!


    Thanks. I don't still feel myself yet.. but had to go back to work. :(


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:18:37 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Happy Birthday Indy.

    Howdy Elaine.


     Loved the Shakira Piggy thingy you posted in comparison to C&C's  ROFL.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 10:20:02 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    False alarm....it's in Las Vegas  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


    HA HA HA HA HA


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:20:07 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Happy Birthday Indy.

    Howdy Elaine.


     Loved the Shakira Piggy thingy you posted in comparison to C&C's  ROFL.
    Angie that was Heeeeelarious as Carpe would say....I almost fell on the floor laughing last night. :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 10:20:44 PM
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:22:03 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:
    Hello Lala's! Hi Sam! I see you over there! :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:22:41 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:


      LOL   :wink:

     lalas.. IMO I think he was there as well.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 10:24:34 PM
    I also want to put my thoughts out there to Tibro and hubby. I think they had the funeral for the nephew today. May God hold them all in his loving hands!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:29:20 PM
    Quote from: "Elaine"
    I also want to put my thoughts out there to Tibro and hubby. I think they had the funeral for the nephew today. May God hold them all in his loving hands!

     :(  Amen Elaine..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 10:29:27 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:


    I think when the Holloway's arrived at his door looking for Nat he had not seem Natalee since the Casino and he didn't know she might have been hurt or in bad condition.

    I know this is way off from what most think. I'm just putting the puzzle together with the pieces that seem to fit adn throwing away the pieces that don't fit.

    Ado


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 10:31:14 PM
    Hi Elaine and Angie!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 10:37:05 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Tiger, do you think Val was there?


      LOL Mishy.. owe me a coke  :wink:


    I haven't heard that one in ages, Angie!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Dayhiker on April 17, 2007, 10:39:50 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Evening Monkeys.   Anyone want to help clean tonight?  I think the cage is a bit messy tonight.

    Ado
    Sorry I didn't answer your questions right away.  I had some things to do and haven't been able to get back with you until now.  The only reason for Paulus to admit to picking up Joran and Natalee at 4 AM would be:

    1. Paulus knew that Joran was the one driving the jeep and he had been confronted with the evidence of such.  He had to justify a witness seeing him. Paulus had seen this witness statement and he was trying to fit him into the scene in order to be able to claim that Natalee was still alive at 4 AM that morning.

    2. Paulus really was picking Joran up at 4 AM.  Joran had made the call and told daddy what had happened.  K2 left him with a passed out Natalee and Paulus picked him up along with Natalee's body.  Something needed to be done with her until he could arrange things and get his thoughts together.  

    3. Joran left with a passed out Natalee in the jeep around 2 that morning.  He was going to leave her on the beach as had been done before. Paulus had heard that someone saw Joran and he was trying to explain it all away.  Maybe by claiming that Joran was driving, but he was in the car with him.  

    4. Paulus was driving with Joran and they had Natalee in the back.  They were going to withdraw money from the ATM in order to pay someone to take care of her.  They were paying someone to bury her at the Fisherman's huts.  Then Joran was to say Deepak claims he went back and killed her.  


    If you read the statements we have and the things we know from other sources and even Shango.  You have the same thing.  Joran was out at 4 AM doing something. Paulus knew what had happened before Beth and Co. arrived at his gate.



    Lalas, your #4 above would account for the question Jacobs asked Deepak in his March 31 statement. Jacobs asked him if he had been to  the Fishermen's Huts that night and Deepak answered "No." This strongly indicates Joran and Paulus had floated such a story to their police buds, one that we haven't read before because Joran's statements are missing.

    We also know that by June 14th Joran, after he recanted the Holiday Inn lie, he attempted to frame Deepak with a similar story in one of his police statements.  


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Hotshot on April 17, 2007, 10:45:39 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Quote from: "Hotshot"
    OK, this vacation is not as good as it should be.  I smoke and have to come to the lobby to use the internet, and that means I can t smoke.......OK, over and out.  Looks like I gotta go pitch a fit......Then out to eat.  See you guys tonight , maybe :?


    Are you really on vacation Hotshot?

    yes I am.  and i finally got my problem fixed.  I hate this laptop too.  Hey FOM, join the club!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 10:50:40 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Tiger, do you think Val was there?


      LOL Mishy.. owe me a coke  :wink:


    I haven't heard that one in ages, Angie!!


     :wink:  I'm old.. what can I say?  lol
    Cute siggy line Lalas   :wink:

    Any more news on the 10  investigators?   :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: adoronron on April 17, 2007, 10:53:58 PM
    nite nite everyone.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 10:55:11 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:


    I think when the Holloway's arrived at his door looking for Nat he had not seem Natalee since the Casino and he didn't know she might have been hurt or in bad condition.

    I know this is way off from what most think. I'm just putting the puzzle together with the pieces that seem to fit adn throwing away the pieces that don't fit.

    Ado


    If you don't mind when you say you are throwing away the pieces that don't fit, please show me those pieces.  I want to see where you are coming from in thinking that Paulus did not know anything about what had gone on between Natalee and Joran until the morning that Beth and Jug arrived.  Your thoughts have me intrigued.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: San on April 17, 2007, 10:58:04 PM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:


    I think when the Holloway's arrived at his door looking for Nat he had not seem Natalee since the Casino and he didn't know she might have been hurt or in bad condition.

    I know this is way off from what most think. I'm just putting the puzzle together with the pieces that seem to fit adn throwing away the pieces that don't fit.

    Ado


    If you don't mind when you say you are throwing away the pieces that don't fit, please show me those pieces.  I want to see where you are coming from in thinking that Paulus did not know anything about what had gone on between Natalee and Joran until the morning that Beth and Jug arrived.  Your thoughts have me intrigued.

    I don't mind showing you my pieces that I threw away. :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 10:58:17 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    nite nite everyone.

    Nite Adoronron


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 17, 2007, 11:01:06 PM
    Mishy,I think Val,gvc,Guido ,Freddy and joran were there.The next generation has to be trained.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 11:01:55 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Happy Birthday Indy.

    Howdy Elaine.


     Loved the Shakira Piggy thingy you posted in comparison to C&C's  ROFL.


    I get a kick outa that thing everytime I watch it!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tiger on April 17, 2007, 11:02:58 PM
    Oh,hello Happy Birthday.I love Both Disney's.I like the Haunted Mansion,Mr Frogs ride and Its A wonderful World


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 11:05:53 PM
    Quote from: "Tiger"
    Mishy,I think Val,gvc,Guido ,Freddy and joran were there.The next generation has to be trained.


    I happen not to agree that Val was there. But do agree that this sick tourist abduction thing is something that has been going on for some time. I few pages back I posted that  description by a A. Cormier of both her and her husband having been abducted, and that occured in 1996..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Elaine on April 17, 2007, 11:06:08 PM
    Quote from: "Tiger"
    Mishy,I think Val,gvc,Guido ,Freddy and joran were there.The next generation has to be trained.
    Hi Tiger!! :wink: Hello also to Mishy! :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:13:42 PM
    Quote from: "Tiger"
    Oh,hello Happy Birthday.I love Both Disney's.I like the Haunted Mansion,Mr Frogs ride and Its A wonderful World

     

    me too Tiger.. and space mountain  :) and the shows.. ESP the president one!!  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 11:14:36 PM
    Does Tiger mean, "It's a Small World?"

    Space mountain rocks, Angie!!

    Hey Lanie  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: mishy on April 17, 2007, 11:22:23 PM
    Cya sweet monkeys...off to do the nighty routine before I go to bed!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:23:56 PM
    Quote from: "mishy"
    Cya sweet monkeys...off to do the nighty routine before I go to bed!!

     Night Mishy  hope La Pooh is better  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:28:39 PM
    Anyone happen to know what yugef means?  I got an weird email I wont open?
     from a nicollanns in RE: to yugef?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:33:45 PM
    its yuquef  not  yugef.. ?  The q looked like a g?


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 11:33:59 PM
    Quote from: "adoronron"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Ado
    So you think Paulus was where?  At home? He didn't know about what happened?  You will learn that I am the monkey with the most questions.  :lol:


    I think when the Holloway's arrived at his door looking for Nat he had not seem Natalee since the Casino and he didn't know she might have been hurt or in bad condition.

    I know this is way off from what most think. I'm just putting the puzzle together with the pieces that seem to fit adn throwing away the pieces that don't fit.

    Ado


    Ado, I assume you do not adhere to the theory that Paulus Van der Sloot had any participation in the events of that fateful morning of May 30, 2005 ... he did not participate in assisting his son in the "disappearance" of Natalee's body.

    Janet


    TJ Ward
    Court TV - Catherine Crier
    September 26, 2005

    WARD: ... We think something did happen to her and she apparently passed out, had a heart attack, stopped breathing. We still believe that Paul Van der Sloot was called and he has a direct involvement with Natalee Holloway’s disappearance.


    Gerold Dompig
    48 HOURS MYSTERY
    Mar. 22/06
     
    Dompig says he believes Paulus Van der Sloot does know more than he has been telling about the circumstances surrounding Holloway's disappearance.


    Gerold Dompig
    48 HOURS MYSTERY
    March 22, 2006

    The Aruban authorities’ new theory is that someone, someone possibly very close to the young suspects, took the time to carefully hide the body, not once but maybe twice, literally re-burying her.
     

    Gerold Dompig
    48 HOURS MYSTER
    March 22, 2006
     
    Dompig speculates the body was hastily buried once, and that extra accomplices may have been needed to move it to a more hidden location


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:35:24 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    its yuquef  not  yugef.. ?  The q looked like a g?


     Yuqef   ?  geesh Im talking to myself ..


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Tamikosmom on April 17, 2007, 11:37:44 PM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Anyone happen to know what yugef means?  I got an weird email I wont open?
     from a nicollanns in RE: to yugef?


    Angie ... I would suggest that you report it as junk and ... delete it without opening.  Do not take a chance.

    Hey hon ... glad you are feeling better.

    Good Night All!

    Janet


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:41:27 PM
    Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Anyone happen to know what yugef means?  I got an weird email I wont open?
     from a nicollanns in RE: to yugef?


    Angie ... I would suggest that you report it as junk and ... delete it without opening.  Do not take a chance.

    Hey hon ... glad you are feeling better.

    Good Night All!

    Janet


     Night Janet..
     This came to my regular email addy? Not spam or junk? I didnt open and dont plan on it. Maybe it was a mistake on someones part? I googled that word in the subject.. and all I see is Chinese?  As if I can read that..lol


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: bleachedblack on April 17, 2007, 11:45:02 PM
    Night Monkeys.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 11:46:09 PM
    San
    Show me your pieces. LOL


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:46:13 PM
    Quote from: "bleachedblack"
    Night Monkeys.


     Night to yah BB


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 17, 2007, 11:53:31 PM
    Angie - I get alot of stuff like that - just DELETE IT.  If you don't know who it came from DELETE IT  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 17, 2007, 11:56:40 PM
    Angie
    That sounds like one of those scam thingys. Delete it.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 17, 2007, 11:58:08 PM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - I get alot of stuff like that - just DELETE IT.  If you don't know who it came from DELETE IT  :wink:


      Klass and Lalas.  Deleted as we speak. !!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:00:02 AM
    Where did Ado go?  I have more questions.  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:00:14 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - I get alot of stuff like that - just DELETE IT.  If you don't know who it came from DELETE IT  :wink:


      Klass and Lalas.  Deleted as we speak. !!

    Good, now go check out the 4th of July avatar I fixed for you in the Monkey Lounge  :lol:

    Nevermind...you already saw it and CBB made you one too!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:03:04 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Where did Ado go?  I have more questions.  :roll:

     :wink:  Maybe Ado sleeps?  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:11:58 AM
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:13:03 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - I get alot of stuff like that - just DELETE IT.  If you don't know who it came from DELETE IT  :wink:


      Klass and Lalas.  Deleted as we speak. !!

    Good, now go check out the 4th of July avatar I fixed for you in the Monkey Lounge  :lol:

    Nevermind...you already saw it and CBB made you one too!


      LOL  ~!! I love them both!!  :)  :lol:  :lol:  Definately have to change back and forth on those 2  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:14:14 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Where did Ado go?  I have more questions.  :roll:

     :wink:  Maybe Ado sleeps?  :lol:


     :shock:  How dare he/she  lol   :wink:
    I want to know their secret..  :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:14:39 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


    Hope you aren't getting rusty Robots  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:15:32 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "robots"
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


    Hope you aren't getting rusty Robots  :wink:


    just cranky  :smt033


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Observer on April 18, 2007, 12:16:11 AM
    HAPPY BIRTHDAY INDYDAN!!
    _________________
    Natalee deserves Justice, her family deserves answers.


    Happy Birthday!!!!!!!!!!You are a great supporter of Natalee..I hope some day we can all celebrate her getting some justice.. :!:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:17:24 AM
    Is it just me or does Klaas seem a little edgy lately?  :roll:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:18:42 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


      Its been pretty yucky here in Pa as well  Robots.
    Rain.. rain.. umm.. rain.. <missed that snow storm we were suppose to get hit with though>.. more rain.. windy as heck.. and  did I mention rain?  :roll:
     Between tomorrow and Friday. climbing to the 50's..
     Sat, Sun and Monday in the 60's?  Hot dang.. heatwave here..  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:19:21 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is it just me or does Klaas seem a little edgy lately?  :roll:

     :lol:  :lol: Only when people argue when I'm trying to work, lol  :lol:  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:19:25 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is it just me or does Klaas seem a little edgy lately?  :roll:



    i think she will be "running" to the store soon

    and then i will be RUNNING WILD in here  :mrgreen:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:20:18 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


      Its been pretty yucky here in Pa as well  Robots.
    Rain.. rain.. umm.. rain.. <missed that snow storm we were suppose to get hit with though>.. more rain.. windy as heck.. and  did I mention rain?  :roll:
     Between tomorrow and Friday. climbing to the 50's..
     Sat, Sun and Monday in the 60's?  Hot dang.. heatwave here..  :wink:



    hi i like rain and i like wind
    but i dont need any more for awhile  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:21:38 AM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/MadCowAruba.jpg)

    No mad cow disease (BSE), but one case of the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease    

    No mad cow disease (BSE) in Aruba, but one case of the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease, said the management of the Horacio Oduber Hospital in an emergency press conference last Sunday.

    ORANJESTAD – The Horacio Oduber Hospital held an emergency press conference as a result of rumours about a patient that was admitted in the hospital and infected with BSE, or mad cow disease.  According to the hospital, the woman has the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease, which is indeed related to BSE.  

    The patient was admitted in the hospital last month and the personnel noticed symptoms of the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease on her.  Since Aruba does not have the necessary material and expertise to diagnose such illnesses, they sent specimen to the Academic Medial Center in the Netherlands .  When the results indicated that the patient has indeed the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease, the hospital started to sterilize everything possible.  Spokesperson Bob Harms says that out of precaution, some things will even be thrown away.    

    The disease is contagious.  People in other countries died in surgery after the same instruments were used on a patient with the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease during operation.  

    They do not know yet whether other people in the hospital were infected.  The hospital held a press conference this afternoon, but this paper didn’t get any information on this before it went to press.    

    There are three ways to get the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease; spontaneously, by inheritor, or by medical treatments.  Over 80 percent of the cases are spontaneous, also called sporadic cases.  The hospital says that from analysis it appears that the woman contracted the disease spontaneously.  The disease doesn’t show itself at first.  The symptoms, headache, tiredness or depression do not immediately point at Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease.  Once the patient starts getting disturbance of equilibrium, tingling in the limbs and amnesia, it goes downhill real fast.  The average period of sickness is four months and after two years, part of the disease will still remain in the body.  Especially people in the age of 50 to 70 get this disease.  

    BSE (boviene spongiforme encefalopathie) or the mad cow disease was considered a variety of the Creuzfeldt-Jacob disease in the nineties.  Based on the symptoms it was finally defined as a separate disease.  Even though it was not proved, people that get this disease have probably eaten infected beef products.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:21:46 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is it just me or does Klaas seem a little edgy lately?  :roll:

     :lol:  :lol: Only when people argue when I'm trying to work, lol  :lol:  :lol:


    I wasn't arguing with Ado...I promise.  Sorry.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:23:34 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is it just me or does Klaas seem a little edgy lately?  :roll:

     :lol:  :lol: Only when people argue when I'm trying to work, lol  :lol:  :lol:


    I wasn't arguing with Ado...I promise.  Sorry.

    Oh, I know...I didn't mean to come accross as cranky when I said he might be sleeping.  I was joking  :lol:

    I was talking about the arguing going on earlier today about the pet food recall.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:23:39 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


      Its been pretty yucky here in Pa as well  Robots.
    Rain.. rain.. umm.. rain.. <missed that snow storm we were suppose to get hit with though>.. more rain.. windy as heck.. and  did I mention rain?  :roll:
     Between tomorrow and Friday. climbing to the 50's..
     Sat, Sun and Monday in the 60's?  Hot dang.. heatwave here..  :wink:



    hi i like rain and i like wind
    but i dont need any more for awhile  8)


     I can totally relate~!!   8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:24:25 AM
    I should do a Guido one too  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:25:23 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "robots"
    waiting for the rain to stop

    my goodness


    i mean it always does, but enough already


    robots is a ranting  8)  :lol:


      Its been pretty yucky here in Pa as well  Robots.
    Rain.. rain.. umm.. rain.. <missed that snow storm we were suppose to get hit with though>.. more rain.. windy as heck.. and  did I mention rain?  :roll:
     Between tomorrow and Friday. climbing to the 50's..
     Sat, Sun and Monday in the 60's?  Hot dang.. heatwave here..  :wink:



    hi i like rain and i like wind
    but i dont need any more for awhile  8)


     I can totally relate~!!   8)



     :smt032


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:26:05 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I should do a Guido one too  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


    yes, please do

    make them kissing each other  :lol:  8)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:27:45 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I should do a Guido one too  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


    yes, please do

    make them kissing each other  :lol:  8)




     :smt030


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:29:45 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Is it just me or does Klaas seem a little edgy lately?  :roll:

     :lol:  :lol: Only when people argue when I'm trying to work, lol  :lol:  :lol:


    I wasn't arguing with Ado...I promise.  Sorry.

    Oh, I know...I didn't mean to come accross as cranky when I said he might be sleeping.  I was joking  :lol:

    I was talking about the arguing going on earlier today about the pet food recall.


    Oh, thank goodness!  I was about to write my own name in the book.  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:33:52 AM
    its late and I am dense.. ROFL
     Klaas that mad cow thing, is that for real?
     

    It reminded me of something a friend of mine sent me LONG LONG ago..
     iI nobody cant stand to hear cuss words.. don't EVEN click on the link.
     Its a cartoon video. with a mad cow.   LMAO   I warned ya'll.  he cusses.
     So enter at your own risk   :lol:  :lol:

    http://www.hahahumor.com/funny-flash-animations/funny-flash-animations-view.php?id=50


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:34:54 AM
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "robots"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    I should do a Guido one too  :lol:

    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


    yes, please do

    make them kissing each other  :lol:  8)




     :smt030


      ROFL  Eekkkkkkkkkkkkk  !!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:36:26 AM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GuidoSkip.gif)(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:37:36 AM
    Angie - the article from Amigoe is REAL.  The photo is fake, lol  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:38:02 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GuidoSkip.gif)(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)


     OMG  ROFLMAO  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:39:07 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - the article from Amigoe is REAL.  The photo is fake, lol  :lol:


     I figured the pic was fake   :lol:
     And fel for the poor person whos sick  :shock:
     ANd I justed posted that naughty cartoon  :shock:
    Lalas.. grab your MUFFS!  :shock:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:40:21 AM
    Not to make the mod testy here...but please refresh my memory here...

    Natalee got in the car on May 29.  
    She didn't show up on May 30.
    Beth and Jug arrived on June 1.

    If this is incorrect...someone please correct me. TIA


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: robots on April 18, 2007, 12:40:33 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/GuidoSkip.gif)(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/JoranDance.gif)



     :smt033  :smt005


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:42:15 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Not to make the mod testy here...but please refresh my memory here...

    Natalee got in the car on May 29.  
    She didn't show up on May 30.
    Beth and Jug arrived on June 1.

    If this is incorrect...someone please correct me. TIA

    Natalee got in the car at approx 1:30am 5/30
    She didn't show up in the morning at the hotel on 5/30
    Beth and Jug actually arrive in Aruba on 5/30 at about 11pm
    Beth and Jug were at the VDS house by 3am 5/31


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:45:51 AM
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - the article from Amigoe is REAL.  The photo is fake, lol  :lol:


     I figured the pic was fake   :lol:
     And fel for the poor person whos sick  :shock:
     ANd I justed posted that naughty cartoon  :shock:
    Lalas.. grab your MUFFS!  :shock:


    OMG!  Angie.  That was hilarious!  I didn't wear muffs either.   Mishy sent me the absolutely funniest thing today.  I am still laughing.  I had everyone that read it rolling with laughter.  If I knew how to get in the lounge I would post it.  I bet you got one too, Angie.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:48:07 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Not to make the mod testy here...but please refresh my memory here...

    Natalee got in the car on May 29.  
    She didn't show up on May 30.
    Beth and Jug arrived on June 1.

    If this is incorrect...someone please correct me. TIA

    Natalee got in the car at approx 1:30am 5/30
    She didn't show up in the morning at the hotel on 5/30
    Beth and Jug actually arrive in Aruba on 5/30 at about 11pm
    Beth and Jug were at the VDS house by 3am 5/31


    Thanks! O wonderful Klaas!  :wink:  So basically Paulus only had about 24 hours to get his story together before Anita arrived from Holland.  hmmmm.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:48:51 AM
    Lala's - did you see the thread in the Monkey Lounge?  The posts I moved from here to there?  That's what I was upset about today.  I'm over it now, lol  :lol:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:49:29 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Not to make the mod testy here...but please refresh my memory here...

    Natalee got in the car on May 29.  
    She didn't show up on May 30.
    Beth and Jug arrived on June 1.

    If this is incorrect...someone please correct me. TIA

    Natalee got in the car at approx 1:30am 5/30
    She didn't show up in the morning at the hotel on 5/30
    Beth and Jug actually arrive in Aruba on 5/30 at about 11pm
    Beth and Jug were at the VDS house by 3am 5/31


    Thanks! O wonderful Klaas!  :wink:  So basically Paulus only had about 24 hours to get his story together before Anita arrived from Holland.  hmmmm.

    Right, Anita arrived on June 1


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on April 18, 2007, 12:49:37 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Angie - the article from Amigoe is REAL.  The photo is fake, lol  :lol:


     I figured the pic was fake   :lol:
     And fel for the poor person whos sick  :shock:
     ANd I justed posted that naughty cartoon  :shock:
    Lalas.. grab your MUFFS!  :shock:


    OMG!  Angie.  That was hilarious!  I didn't wear muffs either.   Mishy sent me the absolutely funniest thing today.  I am still laughing.  I had everyone that read it rolling with laughter.  If I knew how to get in the lounge I would post it.  I bet you got one too, Angie.

     
     The washcloth?   :wink:   ROFL
    and TY for not writing me up in the book !  :shock:
     I am gonna get to bed.. long work day tomorrow..
     Hugs to  NEMO and goodnight everyone!!     :)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:50:22 AM
    Nite Angie


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:52:24 AM
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Lala's - did you see the thread in the Monkey Lounge?  The posts I moved from here to there?  That's what I was upset about today.  I'm over it now, lol  :lol:


    If it concerns animals...I may not need to go over there.  I am very opinionated about all my babies.  Heck, I love them almost as much as my own child.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 12:53:09 AM
    Night Angie. Yes, the washcloth.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 12:55:02 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    Quote from: "klaasend"
    Lala's - did you see the thread in the Monkey Lounge?  The posts I moved from here to there?  That's what I was upset about today.  I'm over it now, lol  :lol:


    If it concerns animals...I may not need to go over there.  I am very opinionated about all my babies.  Heck, I love them almost as much as my own child.


    Precisely.  I just wanted you to understand some of my remaining posts in this thead.  The rest were moved.    :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 01:03:16 AM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/BowlingSuspects.jpg)


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: Lala'sMom on April 18, 2007, 01:13:33 AM
    I understand now, Klaas.  I am going to hug Nemo now.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 01:16:53 AM
    Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
    I understand now, Klaas.  I am going to hug Nemo now.

    Nite Lala's  :wink:


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #601 4/15 - 4/17/2007
    Post by: klaasend on April 18, 2007, 01:18:10 AM
    (http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/nowlocked.jpg)

    Please move to LCD# 602

    http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1077

    Even though I know just about everyone has gone to bed now, lol  :wink: