Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 08:14:08 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 08:14:08 PM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/candleman2justice2007.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:30:38 PM
Hello everybody!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:31:38 PM
Angie911, in case you didn't see my post before,  I have a question for you, if you don't mind getting my email from Klaas and emailing me?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 10:32:01 PM
BOY THat was a fast Switch.... :lol:

Did Julia really .... really say "That was the location that needs to be searched"

Where is the fainting smiley when you need it

Thanks Jacquie & SAN


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 01, 2007, 10:32:02 PM
I think Renfro is the perfect  person for Greta to have on her show. With Renfro and Taco, Greta can have a wonderful time admiring the love of her life, Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 10:32:04 PM
Made it....now back to my question...how did we come to think that Deepak's car had tinted windows?  Please!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 10:32:41 PM
On Deepaks tinted windows...

Didn't Beth get that information from MB kids?  Or was it Charles Croes when he and Alberto Levy drove to the beach and spoke to some of the kids there?  Seems it was one or the other. I could be wrong but it seems that's where the tinted windows came from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:32:52 PM
Greta is asking the stupidest obvious questions to Dave... geesh
and the beach again!  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 10:32:53 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Hello everybody!


Hey there TinkerBell...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:33:52 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Hello everybody!


Hey there TinkerBell...


Hey Oldfart!  Nice to see everybody again, huh?
Hopefully this case will be solved very SOON!  
Hope things are going well with you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 01, 2007, 10:34:25 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Greta is asking the stupidest obvious questions to Dave... geesh
and the beach again!  :roll:


Yeah and she can't get over K.J. shoving that car door at her either... Greta holds grudges.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 10:34:40 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I think Renfro is the perfect  person for Greta to have on her show. With Renfro and Taco, Greta can have a wonderful time admiring the love of her life, Joran.


Yes, indeed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 01, 2007, 10:35:40 PM
Greta STFU re 2 year statute of limitations... there isn't one.  We've been telling you.... but you don't understand the Aruban system.   :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 10:36:37 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Made it....now back to my question...how did we come to think that Deepak's car had tinted windows?  Please!!


If IIRC  which is not often.. and if Beth had a description of the car when she got to Aruba  it had to come from a MB student.

If the car was in the back of C&C's  I would think it had to come from someone at the bus stop where ? talked to Natalee
JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:36:48 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Greta STFU re 2 year statute of limitations... there isn't one.  We've been telling you.... but you don't understand the Aruban system.   :wink:  :wink:


Well, Vinda is finally clearing that up.  Hopefully Greta gets it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 01, 2007, 10:37:53 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Greta STFU re 2 year statute of limitations... there isn't one.  We've been telling you.... but you don't understand the Aruban system.   :wink:  :wink:


Well, Vinda is finally clearing that up.  Hopefully Greta gets it!


I'm inclined to believe that she will NOT get it... Greta only hears what she wants and Joe Tacopeenus is misinforming her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 01, 2007, 10:37:57 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Angie911, in case you didn't see my post before,  I have a question for you, if you don't mind getting my email from Klaas and emailing me?


 I did.. and I got behind.

Email me at Angiex911dsptchr@aol.com    :)
 In the subject say who you are tho...lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: lnichols on May 01, 2007, 10:38:03 PM
Well... Not much of anything new....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 01, 2007, 10:38:14 PM
Got this e-mail:  

Just heard that Taco Joe is defending Internet sexual predators!!!!  What a total jerk!!  It has to do with the Miss America sting.  He was on TV talking about it.

Did you guys hear this?  Maybe it was discussed and I missed a page?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on May 01, 2007, 10:38:46 PM
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:39:26 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Greta STFU re 2 year statute of limitations... there isn't one.  We've been telling you.... but you don't understand the Aruban system.   :wink:  :wink:


Well, Vinda is finally clearing that up.  Hopefully Greta gets it!


I'm inclined to believe that she will NOT get it... Greta only hears what she wants and Joe Tacopeenus is misinforming her.


Yeah and don't forget Renfro!  She's lost the best source of info. - Jossy!
Because of her ignorance


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: lnichols on May 01, 2007, 10:40:00 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


I like your description...LOL...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 01, 2007, 10:40:00 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


Yeah I was howling over that.  It reminded me of when Barbara Walters first got dentures... remember that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Jacqueline on May 01, 2007, 10:40:08 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
BOY THat was a fast Switch.... :lol:

Did Julia really .... really say "That was the location that needs to be searched"

Where is the fainting smiley when you need it

Thanks Jacquie & SAN


Lost my last transcription with the thread change.

Sorry, Monkeys.

Good night, all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 01, 2007, 10:40:15 PM
Vinda de Sousa said people can be prosecuted on new evidence not on old.

So does this mean that they can't prosecute the 3 suspects on evidence that they didn't make public (i.e. Wiretaps).

So if they release Joran from suspect status and the bring forward the evidence KJ withheld he can't be prosecuted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 10:40:30 PM
I never though Greta was much of a looker but didn't realize how much better looking than Refro she is:   :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/videos/th_GretaRenfro.jpg) (http://s118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/videos/?action=view&current=GretaRenfro.flv)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 01, 2007, 10:40:41 PM
Jossy says he's not going on Greta anymore, and lo and behold looks who's on!

Julia always was her source. If tonight didn't prove it, nothing will convince you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 01, 2007, 10:40:59 PM
Greta conducted herself a little differently tonight.   I think she read some of her e-mails.  Or maybe her bosses did.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on May 01, 2007, 10:43:02 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Made it....now back to my question...how did we come to think that Deepak's car had tinted windows?  Please!!
8)

HI Lala'sMom .............

Could Be Cause The Photos Of Bails & Alyse The SUV Has Tinted Windows

BUT THAT IS NOT DEEPAKS CAR........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frijole on May 01, 2007, 10:43:18 PM
LOL.... Jossy cuts off Greta and low and behold... Julia just "happens to be free and available for an interview".  Course her real job doesn't start til later I guess.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on May 01, 2007, 10:43:31 PM
Klaas it don't take much to look better than renho.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 10:43:42 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Got this e-mail:  

Just heard that Taco Joe is defending Internet sexual predators!!!!  What a total jerk!!  It has to do with the Miss America sting.  He was on TV talking about it.

Did you guys hear this?  Maybe it was discussed and I missed a page?


A perdator is a predator.. not matter what source they use.. so Joe should be right at home

Saw something in the news today about her NOT appearing at trials.
I'm say she will because "Internet predators" was one of her "platform" items  IIRC  I'm guessing it is something with the Pagent not wanting her to testify


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 01, 2007, 10:43:57 PM
I am so damn lost.. Thanks to those that agreed with my mush post. LOL Its like we were here for the beginning.. and also have alot of GREAT new posters.. and now we may be here for the end..If it makes sense?
 Gonna shut up now..lol But TY Sam and Inicohls and Mrs Red and anyone else.    I can tell I am older.. I cant keep up anymore..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 01, 2007, 10:44:41 PM
Greta reporting on a missing Attorney that got left on the beach.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thecuz on May 01, 2007, 10:45:37 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Greta STFU re 2 year statute of limitations... there isn't one.  We've been telling you.... but you don't understand the Aruban system.   :wink:  :wink:


Well, Vinda is finally clearing that up.  Hopefully Greta gets it!


I'm inclined to believe that she will NOT get it... Greta only hears what she wants and Joe Tacopeenus is misinforming her.


OMG...LAMO....that is the best taco adjective  have seen yet beaner!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: lnichols on May 01, 2007, 10:46:21 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
I am so damn lost.. Thanks to those that agreed with my mush post. LOL Its like we were here for the beginning.. and also have alot of GREAT new posters.. and now we may be here for the end..If it makes sense?
 Gonna shut up now..lol But TY Sam and Inicohls and Mrs Red and anyone else.    I can tell I am older.. I cant keep up anymore..lol


I don't think that is age... just slower internet connections..LOL  It couldn't be us..LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 01, 2007, 10:47:39 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

Night Monkeys. Sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 01, 2007, 10:47:44 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Got this e-mail:  

Just heard that Taco Joe is defending Internet sexual predators!!!!  What a total jerk!!  It has to do with the Miss America sting.  He was on TV talking about it.

Did you guys hear this?  Maybe it was discussed and I missed a page?


A perdator is a predator.. not matter what source they use.. so Joe should be right at home

Saw something in the news today about her NOT appearing at trials.
I'm say she will because "Internet predators" was one of her "platform" items  IIRC  I'm guessing it is something with the Pagent not wanting her to testify


Wendy Murphy was talking about this and said that everything Miss America did was documented and there will likely be no need for her to testify.  I hope Wendy is involved in this, not just commentary for TV.  If Joey goes on a lies like he does for Joran, she has the guts to rip him apart one greasy hair at a time.  I, for one, would like to be at ringside if that happens.  Especially after Greta's pathetic behavior of recent months.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 10:47:49 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Made it....now back to my question...how did we come to think that Deepak's car had tinted windows?  Please!!
8)

HI Lala'sMom .............

Could Be Cause The Photos Of Bails & Alyse The SUV Has Tinted Windows

BUT THAT IS NOT DEEPAKS CAR........

 8)

No Widget - we were told in the very beginning of the case that Deepak's car had tinted windows.  Has nothing to do with that photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 10:48:50 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
(http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

Night Monkeys. Sweet dreams.



G'Night BTgirl! <huggles>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: lnichols on May 01, 2007, 10:49:08 PM
Good night everyone.... I will be back tomorrow...  a long day ahead tomorrow....
Ok Ang... maybe we are getting older..LOL
Have a great night everyone...

Prayers for Natalee.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on May 01, 2007, 10:50:03 PM
I thought Beth had a description of the car when she hit Aruba.

Lala's I have printed out the 72 pages that lists the statements etc from the Dr Phil Doc.

Kermit, Welcome to the Monkey Cage. Glad to have you here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 01, 2007, 10:50:09 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


  Hmmmmmmmmmm  Fluffa  that does a gum job?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 10:50:52 PM
Quote from: "lnichols"
Good night everyone.... I will be back tomorrow...  a long day ahead tomorrow....
Ok Ang... maybe we are getting older..LOL
Have a great night everyone...

Prayers for Natalee.....


See ya Capt.  take care


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 10:51:00 PM
Quote from: "lnichols"
Good night everyone.... I will be back tomorrow...  a long day ahead tomorrow....
Ok Ang... maybe we are getting older..LOL
Have a great night everyone...

Prayers for Natalee.....


G'Night Inichols!  Sweet dreams   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 10:53:02 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


  Hmmmmmmmmmm  Fluffa  that does a gum job?  :wink:



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Wish we had an emotron that vomits.  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 01, 2007, 10:53:44 PM
Quote from: "San"
Vinda de Sousa said people can be prosecuted on new evidence not on old.

So does this mean that they can't prosecute the 3 suspects on evidence that they didn't make public (i.e. Wiretaps).

So if they release Joran from suspect status and the bring forward the evidence KJ withheld he can't be prosecuted.



Looks like Dutch law is a little more flexible than we were led to believe by the AHATA media trolls, San. From what I get the prosecutor can hold back evidence, like was presented in the wiretap that prevented PVDS from collecting his blood money, and only have to show it when they bring charges. I don't think Paulus saw that one coming.

If this is true there could very well be more than we saw requested in that wagon load that has already been revealed in the Kalpoe discovery request.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:53:45 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Angie911, in case you didn't see my post before,  I have a question for you, if you don't mind getting my email from Klaas and emailing me?


 I did.. and I got behind.

Email me at Angiex911dsptchr@aol.com    :)
 In the subject say who you are tho...lol


Email sent.  (hint:  Dihannah1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on May 01, 2007, 10:55:09 PM
Look at what they found on Aruba after renho got off the videophone  :lol: :

(http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l286/yapperz1/teeth.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 10:56:54 PM
Julia needs to get a real job, her regular one, so we won't have to hear her any more.

She might apply here:

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Text%20Icons/thfluffers.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 10:58:05 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


  Hmmmmmmmmmm  Fluffa  that does a gum job?  :wink:



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Wish we had an emotron that vomits.  lol
we do  :smt078

5 from the bottom 4 from the left of the "View More emoticons"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 10:58:37 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Look at what they found on Aruba after renho got off the videophone  :lol: :

(http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l286/yapperz1/teeth.gif)



 :smt044 :smt046


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 10:58:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Julia needs to get a real job, her regular one, so we won't have to hear her any more.

She might apply here:

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Text%20Icons/thfluffers.jpg)


:smt046   Yes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 10:59:00 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Julia needs to get a real job, her regular one, so we won't have to hear her any more.

She might apply here:

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Text%20Icons/thfluffers.jpg)



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 10:59:30 PM
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 01, 2007, 10:59:35 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Look at what they found on Aruba after renho got off the videophone  :lol: :

(http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l286/yapperz1/teeth.gif)



 :smt119  :smt119 LOL Yapperz! :smt119  :smt119


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 01, 2007, 10:59:56 PM
The Dutch took what 1/2 ton of stuff with them. I saw a pic of the package. The PV's would be only one box of paper of that. And I can bet money that they are NOT using Roger  F or R as or ScubaJap as case guides. Or speaking to Julia / Tito / etc. Patience and put on your seat belts. Oxygen too, if need be.  :lol:  :wink:  I am going to try to take the high road for a while. And NOT go to the bad places. It just gets me angry. And Pray Pray Pray that there will be a conclusion and resolution. And that Natalee is found. And I have felt the mushies too, just like Angie.  Goodnight all. I am worn out from the 171.doc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:00:36 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


  Hmmmmmmmmmm  Fluffa  that does a gum job?  :wink:



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Wish we had an emotron that vomits.  lol



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Icons%20and%20Smilies/211ng3s_th.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:01:01 PM
i watched the BAG tonight because i wanted to SEE jossy not show up

she had a different mood tonight but she is still a HAG

GRETA is a HAG


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:02:32 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


  Hmmmmmmmmmm  Fluffa  that does a gum job?  :wink:



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Wish we had an emotron that vomits.  lol
we do  :smt078

5 from the bottom 4 from the left of the "View More emoticons"


Thanks Oldfart!   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 01, 2007, 11:03:20 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Jossy says he's not going on Greta anymore, and lo and behold looks who's on!

Julia always was her source. If tonight didn't prove it, nothing will convince you.


I agree that Julia has always been her source.

Greta is raunchy, and attracts raunchy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 01, 2007, 11:03:59 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Have ya noticed renho talks like her dentures are flopping? Always sounds like she is trying to talk & keep her teeth in her mouth at the same time.   :roll:


  Hmmmmmmmmmm  Fluffa  that does a gum job?  :wink:
I saw  what appeared to be falsh eyelashes falling off in the breeze, I am not kidding. She was falling apart before our very eyes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:04:44 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The Dutch took what 1/2 ton of stuff with them. I saw a pic of the package. The PV's would be only one box of paper of that. And I can bet money that they are NOT using Roger  F or R as or ScubaJap as case guides. Or speaking to Julia / Tito / etc. Patience and put on your seat belts. Oxygen too, if need be.  :lol:  :wink:  I am going to try to take the high road for a while. And NOT go to the bad places. It just gets me angry. And Pray Pray Pray that there will be a conclusion and resolution. And that Natalee is found. And I have felt the mushies too, just like Angie.  Goodnight all. I am worn out from the 171.doc.



G'Night Kat_Gram, have a good one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:04:51 PM
Robots, you are right.  She's a hag.  But, I do think she read all the Monkey emails, don't you?   :lol:   And that, my friend, makes me very happy!  We as a group made a difference!   We told Greta how ridiculous her Buti story was and her beach story.  Tonight, she asked Dave and he set her straight.  NO BEACH and JORAN AND THE 2K's ARE THE PRIME SUSPECTS.   I think she got the message, thanks to the Monkeys and Dave Holloway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:05:07 PM
i feel more delicious today than i did when the DUTCH first arrived

hang on to your HATS

the JET TRAIN is coming


no worries

JUSTICE is COMING to TOWN  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 01, 2007, 11:05:30 PM
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:05:34 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
(http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

Night Monkeys. Sweet dreams.


Night BT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:05:52 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Robots, you are right.  She's a hag.  But, I do think she read all the Monkey emails, don't you?   :lol:   And that, my friend, makes me very happy!  We as a group made a difference!   We told Greta how ridiculous her Buti story was and her beach story.  Tonight, she asked Dave and he set her straight.  NO BEACH and JORAN AND THE 2K's ARE THE PRIME SUSPECTS.   I think she got the message, thanks to the Monkeys and Dave Holloway.


yes a DIFFERENCE was made  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:06:37 PM
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?



you didnt miss it

she left it out

way to go GRETA you FOOL  :x  :x  :x  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thecuz on May 01, 2007, 11:06:46 PM
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?




i caught that....i think she said natalee but meant beth :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:06:51 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I thought Beth had a description of the car when she hit Aruba.

Lala's I have printed out the 72 pages that lists the statements etc from the Dr Phil Doc.

Kermit, Welcome to the Monkey Cage. Glad to have you here.


Thanks. Nana.

Where did the description come from?  Anyone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:07:01 PM
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?


I heard that too, Jill.  I think she meant Beth when she said Natalee.  I think maybe our emails have rattled some sense into Greta.  Lord knows, someone needed to pound her over the head with the facts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 11:07:10 PM
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?

I think she said Natalee by mistake instead of Beth


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 11:07:14 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:07:27 PM
Quote from: "lnichols"
Good night everyone.... I will be back tomorrow...  a long day ahead tomorrow....
Ok Ang... maybe we are getting older..LOL
Have a great night everyone...

Prayers for Natalee.....


Night, so glad you dropped by.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:07:41 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i watched the BAG tonight because i wanted to SEE jossy not show up

she had a different mood tonight but she is still a HAG

GRETA is a HAG


Hope you are all better from your

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Icons%20and%20Smilies/th11_9_12.gif)

and your

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Icons%20and%20Smilies/th36_2_54.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 11:08:24 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i feel more delicious today than i did when the DUTCH first arrived

hang on to your HATS

the JET TRAIN is coming


no worries

JUSTICE is COMING to TOWN  8)



See my previous post.  I need to hear that!  I pray you are right!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:08:33 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
i watched the BAG tonight because i wanted to SEE jossy not show up

she had a different mood tonight but she is still a HAG

GRETA is a HAG


Hope you are all better from your

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Icons%20and%20Smilies/th11_9_12.gif)

and your

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Icons%20and%20Smilies/th36_2_54.gif)



ROFL

thank you Anna

a little sore...but im ok  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:08:47 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
(http://bestsmileys.com/dental/2.gif)

Night Monkeys. Sweet dreams.


Night BT


Lala's
You still here... did you find your answer?

If any one has the link to Beth's interview where she describes that 1st day.  the phone call, race to the plane, meeting with C. Croes  etc.. it may be in there.
Just a thought


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 01, 2007, 11:09:04 PM
well, gosh, if she's getting details like NAMES wrong - then no wonder she doesn't practice law anymore.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thecuz on May 01, 2007, 11:09:15 PM
klaas,azlady....great minds think alike :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 01, 2007, 11:09:34 PM
AZ, check the lounge.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 11:09:37 PM
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?


I missed that!  How sad!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thecuz on May 01, 2007, 11:10:11 PM
klaas,azlady....great minds think alike :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:10:25 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.



everyone has been more than patient

i do not think the DUTCH want to made fools of

nope, they solve this and they look like heroes


they dont solve it they will be FOREVER linked with ALE


it will be SOLVED


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 11:10:25 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
AZ, check the lounge.  :wink:


CBB, YOU check the lounge!   :)   Just posted something for you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:10:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I thought Beth had a description of the car when she hit Aruba.

Lala's I have printed out the 72 pages that lists the statements etc from the Dr Phil Doc.

Kermit, Welcome to the Monkey Cage. Glad to have you here.


Thanks. Nana.

Where did the description come from?  Anyone?



I posted where I think it came from, but I guess it's wrong.  I still say either MB kids told Beth or the boy on the beach that Charles Croes spoke to when Joran was discribed to them. I thought they said something about tinted windows and loud exhaust, but I could be wrong. <shrugs>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 01, 2007, 11:10:33 PM
Good night all.

I could have sworn it was the photo that made us think of the tinted windows. Glad now I am so slow and did not say it , lol


Oh I just read Jills post and Robots reply about Beth Not being mentioned. That sucks. Oh well Greta will get hers I am sure. It is just a matter of time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:10:52 PM
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?


talk about putting both feet in your Mouth...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:10:57 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Made it....now back to my question...how did we come to think that Deepak's car had tinted windows?  Please!!
8)

HI Lala'sMom .............

Could Be Cause The Photos Of Bails & Alyse The SUV Has Tinted Windows

BUT THAT IS NOT DEEPAKS CAR........

 8)



But there was also the information about the loud muffler system, which I think was verified. Don't know what process the windows had as far as tinting....but maybe Depak had it removed? Is that even possible?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 01, 2007, 11:11:01 PM
i noticed she got the friggin DOGS names right.

(btw - Lola completely upstaged Greta.  They should have her on every night).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:11:57 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.


NO NO NO!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Do not worry that they have not come up with anything yet.  You are sounding much too impatient--just like I sound most of the time.  We all want this thing resolved now, but a good investigation takes time--remember that.  I would be worried if the investigators walked out of there and said we couldn't find anything and went back to Holland, tails between their legs.  This isn't happening.  They are still tight-lipped, working the case.  These guys are professionals--the like of which Aruba has not seen yet.  In fact, most of us have never seen people like this work because they do not call attention to themselves or their work.

Patience, patience.  It will happen, in due time.  Joran is scared, very scared.  Paulus is scared, Anita is scared and the 2K's are nearly catatonic.  It is coming.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:12:12 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.



An old saying...

"No news is good news".  Keep the Faith all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 01, 2007, 11:12:12 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Robots, you are right.  She's a hag.  But, I do think she read all the Monkey emails, don't you?   :lol:   And that, my friend, makes me very happy!  We as a group made a difference!   We told Greta how ridiculous her Buti story was and her beach story.  Tonight, she asked Dave and he set her straight.  NO BEACH and JORAN AND THE 2K's ARE THE PRIME SUSPECTS.   I think she got the message, thanks to the Monkeys and Dave Holloway.


yes a DIFFERENCE was made  8)
I agree. :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:12:47 PM
here is the BOTTOM LINE


when the DUTCH SOLVE IT = HEROES


DUTCH DONT  Solve it = FOREVER LINKED with the CORRPTION


naw..............

BET it all  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:13:53 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I thought Beth had a description of the car when she hit Aruba.

Lala's I have printed out the 72 pages that lists the statements etc from the Dr Phil Doc.

Kermit, Welcome to the Monkey Cage. Glad to have you here.


Thanks. Nana.

Where did the description come from?  Anyone?



I posted where I think it came from, but I guess it's wrong.  I still say either MB kids told Beth or the boy on the beach that Charles Croes spoke to when Joran was discribed to them. I thought they said something about tinted windows and loud exhaust, but I could be wrong. <shrugs>



Yes, wasn't that what one of those people on the island said when Charles Croes asked them about Joran?  If that's true I need to see that quote again, please.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: lexie on May 01, 2007, 11:14:14 PM
I was surprised that Vinda deSousa is still considered Dave's attorney.  She made a point tonight of saying that the Dutch did not take over the investigation, they are just helping out.  She also said she thought that ALE did "all they could do at the time" to solve the case.  

Sorry, I have little faith in her since she advised Beth to issue that apology.  She did try to explain to Grater the "2 yr" thing, but did not report that the Dutch had already extended the case, and that the suspects will remain suspect indefinitely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:14:41 PM
Sure sounds like Greta needs a few more emails asking why she left out Beth!

But she did sound entirely different tonight.  Not once did she make her ridiculous claim of "We KNOW they left her on the beach!"  No one is buying that crapola these days, Gret!

 :roll:

Joran lies, too.  He says he lies every day and just can't stop lying about his lies that he lies constantly.  Lies.

But Greta is inclined to believe him?

Yes, I think Janet is on to something like that being all preplanned to get the interview.  Talk about a ratings whore!

Oh, no!  Get the muffs quick!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:14:43 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "jill"
I haven't read all of what you all have posted after the Greta crock-of-poop show, but did you notice that at the end she told Dave that she receives emails everyday (lol) and that everyone is hoping that Natalee, Dave, Robin and Jug get their answers?

Did I miss her not mention Beth in there?


talk about putting both feet in your Mouth...


Even worse...she's still chewing. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 01, 2007, 11:14:59 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Made it....now back to my question...how did we come to think that Deepak's car had tinted windows?  Please!!
8)

HI Lala'sMom .............

Could Be Cause The Photos Of Bails & Alyse The SUV Has Tinted Windows

BUT THAT IS NOT DEEPAKS CAR........

 8)



But there was also the information about the loud muffler system, which I think was verified. Don't know what process the windows had as far as tinting....but maybe Depak had it removed? Is that even possible?


I don't know if it is still available, but the tinting used to be sold in sheeting that was put on like contac paper...it could be peeled off...but, I am going back a few years...it's usually in the glass now.  

We did discuss the car being detailed in the timeframe before their arrest...windows could have been replaced, or switched.....I do remember photos of the tow truck taking the car and other pics thought to be THAT car...iirc, tinted windows or not was brought up back then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 11:15:03 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.


NO NO NO!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Do not worry that they have not come up with anything yet.  You are sounding much too impatient--just like I sound most of the time.  We all want this thing resolved now, but a good investigation takes time--remember that.  I would be worried if the investigators walked out of there and said we couldn't find anything and went back to Holland, tails between their legs.  This isn't happening.  They are still tight-lipped, working the case.  These guys are professionals--the like of which Aruba has not seen yet.  In fact, most of us have never seen people like this work because they do not call attention to themselves or their work.

Patience, patience.  It will happen, in due time.  Joran is scared, very scared.  Paulus is scared, Anita is scared and the 2K's are nearly catatonic.  It is coming.


You and Robots are probably right.  Geesh after 2 yrs. you'd think I would have learned patience by now! :o   Just having a bad moment! Thanks for bringing back to reality!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:15:24 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Good night all.

I could have sworn it was the photo that made us think of the tinted windows. Glad now I am so slow and did not say it , lol


Oh I just read Jills post and Robots reply about Beth Not being mentioned. That sucks. Oh well Greta will get hers I am sure. It is just a matter of time.



G'Night Sam!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 01, 2007, 11:15:42 PM
Yes Jill,I noticed the lack of a name,by what's her name


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:15:59 PM
I am proud of the Monkeys tonight and proud to be a Monkey.  I see a visible difference in the reporting tonight on this case.  We did that, Monkeys.  The emails worked.  Greta now knows that the many Monkeys who have followed this case are going to hold her feet to the fire.  We are the reason she had high ratings two years ago, and we are the reason she changed her attitude tonight.  Way to go, Monkeys!!   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:16:50 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I thought Beth had a description of the car when she hit Aruba.

Lala's I have printed out the 72 pages that lists the statements etc from the Dr Phil Doc.

Kermit, Welcome to the Monkey Cage. Glad to have you here.


Thanks. Nana.

Where did the description come from?  Anyone?



I posted where I think it came from, but I guess it's wrong.  I still say either MB kids told Beth or the boy on the beach that Charles Croes spoke to when Joran was discribed to them. I thought they said something about tinted windows and loud exhaust, but I could be wrong. <shrugs>



Yes, wasn't that what one of those people on the island said when Charles Croes asked them about Joran?  If that's true I need to see that quote again, please.


Remember the re-enactment made by the Dutch in which they used Deepak's actual car, well didn't the car in the re-enactment have tinted windows?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:17:04 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.


NO NO NO!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Do not worry that they have not come up with anything yet.  You are sounding much too impatient--just like I sound most of the time.  We all want this thing resolved now, but a good investigation takes time--remember that.  I would be worried if the investigators walked out of there and said we couldn't find anything and went back to Holland, tails between their legs.  This isn't happening.  They are still tight-lipped, working the case.  These guys are professionals--the like of which Aruba has not seen yet.  In fact, most of us have never seen people like this work because they do not call attention to themselves or their work.

Patience, patience.  It will happen, in due time.  Joran is scared, very scared.  Paulus is scared, Anita is scared and the 2K's are nearly catatonic.  It is coming.


You and Robots are probably right.  Geesh after 2 yrs. you'd think I would have learned patience by now! :o   Just having a bad moment! Thanks for bringing back to reality!  :D


dont worry

you are smart  :D

people all get a little nervous

the good thing about ROBOTS,, we never get nervous

its not in us   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:17:14 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yup, I sensed Greta had a much more subdued attitude tonight.  She let her guests talk--for a change.  I like that she asked Dave about the beach story and he told her straight out--no, they didn't leave her at the beach.  She asked Dave if he thought the investigation should have looked at other avenues than the three perps.  He told her no, everything comes back to Joran and the 2K's.  He told her they did did look at other leads and explanations, but they always came back to Joran and the 2k's.  Dave said he felt others might also be involved.  

I did hear Dave say that the FBI told him the family would be contacted first if they found anything at the Sloot house.   He admitted that this means they did not find anything at the Sloot house.  However, I believe he meant they did not find Natalee's body there.  This does not mean they didn't find evidence there--blood, dna, other evidence that still needs to be tested before identified.  This takes time, so do not give up yet, folks.  These people will find out what happened.  I know they will.


I agree, but she asking such obvious questions, like "what would you like to happen now in this case?"  Well DUH!

I'm beginning to worry, if they aren't coming up with anything.  I'm praying they are just being tight lipped right now.  So sick of the ups and downs, as I know we all are.


NO NO NO!!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Do not worry that they have not come up with anything yet.  You are sounding much too impatient--just like I sound most of the time.  We all want this thing resolved now, but a good investigation takes time--remember that.  I would be worried if the investigators walked out of there and said we couldn't find anything and went back to Holland, tails between their legs.  This isn't happening.  They are still tight-lipped, working the case.  These guys are professionals--the like of which Aruba has not seen yet.  In fact, most of us have never seen people like this work because they do not call attention to themselves or their work.

Patience, patience.  It will happen, in due time.  Joran is scared, very scared.  Paulus is scared, Anita is scared and the 2K's are nearly catatonic.  It is coming.

AZLady  
Very well said.. Much like our own FBI operate but I think even tighter on the release of info.  
I'm just impatient and to pray that they have something to work with


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:17:55 PM
Did someone say muffs?  :shock:

Where did we hear about the windows?  From whom?  I know, dead horse, yada, yada, yada.... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:17:56 PM
ROBOTS, you are too cool!!

 :lol:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 01, 2007, 11:18:37 PM
Lala's Mom:  I had thought we had seen pictures of Deepak's car-one time it didn't have tinted windows, and one time it did.  One of the pictures that comes to mind was when it was on a tow truck maybe?  Gee, it's been so long.  The point of the discussion about the tinted windows at one time, and not having tinted windows the other time, was changes that were made to the car that might have to do with Natalee's case. Remember there was also discussion about how low set his car was, and if it could make it up/down some of the roads to places on the island?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:18:37 PM
if the DUTCH come out tomorrow and say the case is over

and they find nothing......

thats bad



give them a week -2 weeks

then the ARRESTS will come  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 01, 2007, 11:18:52 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Angie911, in case you didn't see my post before,  I have a question for you, if you don't mind getting my email from Klaas and emailing me?


 I did.. and I got behind.

Email me at Angiex911dsptchr@aol.com    :)
 In the subject say who you are tho...lol


Email sent.  (hint:  Dihannah1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.com)  :wink:


 Got it.   Sent yah lots of links.. and IF I can help you in anyway. I will.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:18:55 PM
Quote from: "lexie"
I was surprised that Vinda deSousa is still considered Dave's attorney.  She made a point tonight of saying that the Dutch did not take over the investigation, they are just helping out.  She also said she thought that ALE did "all they could do at the time" to solve the case.  

Sorry, I have little faith in her since she advised Beth to issue that apology.  She did try to explain to Grater the "2 yr" thing, but did not report that the Dutch had already extended the case, and that the suspects will remain suspect indefinitely.



With lawyers like this, no wonder the family doesn't know what's going on.  Yes, she was a spokesperson for the bungling Keystone ALE only.  I did not think what she said was even factual and contradicts what even the Justice has said in Aruba that this is an independent investigation.

Guess she thinks she has to live and work on the island and is just not going to buck the system at all.  Big loser!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 01, 2007, 11:19:15 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say muffs?  :shock:

Where did we hear about the windows?  From whom?  I know, dead horse, yada, yada, yada.... :roll:


Muffs?  Muffy's?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 01, 2007, 11:19:38 PM
The one thing that got me about Greta was when she asked the "ho" about did the prosecution find anything during the search of the VDS property etc, ...she responded "They said no, they found nothing, no body"....Then Greta asked Dave "Did you hear anything from the prosecution?...He said "No". So once again, I have to ask...Why would the prosecution tell Renho what the results of the search was, and not Dave? Renho...You know you are FOS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:20:08 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
ROBOTS, you are too cool!!

 :lol:  8)


tell that to my kids.... 8)

the have been calling me ROBOTS for months  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

but they always have a  little  rolling eye action going on when they call me that  

soon, i will be able to say....ROBOTS WAS RIGHT

and the EYE ROLLING STOPS  8)  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:20:21 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say muffs?  :shock:

Where did we hear about the windows?  From whom?  I know, dead horse, yada, yada, yada.... :roll:


I'm sorry, Lala's, I'm not ignoring you.  I just don't remember exactly.  I thought the kid that Charles Croes talked to on the night Beth arrived told him about the car, saying that was Joran's car.  I thought part of the description was the tinted windows.  If my memory is correct, it could be verified in C. Croes' interview with Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:21:20 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "lexie"
I was surprised that Vinda deSousa is still considered Dave's attorney.  She made a point tonight of saying that the Dutch did not take over the investigation, they are just helping out.  She also said she thought that ALE did "all they could do at the time" to solve the case.  

Sorry, I have little faith in her since she advised Beth to issue that apology.  She did try to explain to Grater the "2 yr" thing, but did not report that the Dutch had already extended the case, and that the suspects will remain suspect indefinitely.



With lawyers like this, no wonder the family doesn't know what's going on.  Yes, she was a spokesperson for the bungling Keystone ALE only.  I did not think what she said was even factual and contradicts what even the Justice has said in Aruba that this is an independent investigation.

Guess she thinks she has to live and work on the island and is just not going to buck the system at all.  Big loser!

.


yep
nailed it
INSTANT WINNNER
RIGHT ON
easy as pie  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 01, 2007, 11:21:34 PM
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE


when the DUTCH SOLVE IT = HEROES


DUTCH DONT  Solve it = FOREVER LINKED with the CORRPTION


naw..............

BET it all  8)


Very true!  They have layed there necks on this one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: lexie on May 01, 2007, 11:21:36 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "lexie"
I was surprised that Vinda deSousa is still considered Dave's attorney.  She made a point tonight of saying that the Dutch did not take over the investigation, they are just helping out.  She also said she thought that ALE did "all they could do at the time" to solve the case.  

Sorry, I have little faith in her since she advised Beth to issue that apology.  She did try to explain to Grater the "2 yr" thing, but did not report that the Dutch had already extended the case, and that the suspects will remain suspect indefinitely.



With lawyers like this, no wonder the family doesn't know what's going on.  Yes, she was a spokesperson for the bungling Keystone ALE only.  I did not think what she said was even factual and contradicts what even the Justice has said in Aruba that this is an independent investigation.

Guess she thinks she has to live and work on the island and is just not going to buck the system at all.  Big loser!

.


That was my first thought when I learned she was the one who insisted Beth apologize...."guess she has to work there"... So, throw the clients under the bus??  Very unprofessional to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:21:54 PM
We must all focus our minds very hard on the Dutch finding something and think really positive thoughts in this regard, visualizations even!  Send them the vibes to find our girl!

Can't hurt, might help!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:22:06 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say muffs?  :shock:

Where did we hear about the windows?  From whom?  I know, dead horse, yada, yada, yada.... :roll:

Did you ask or did I read it incorrectly(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/14fd14d4.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 01, 2007, 11:22:19 PM
Ohh.  And remember we had a lot of discussion about interiors of cars.  Like there were some photos of inside of cars, and sometimes you could see someone just outside the car.  Window tint was discussed then too, I think.  And we were trying to figure out what kind of car etc.  Whew.  It's been so long...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:22:29 PM
VAN SUSTEREN: Did Beth have any idea at that point, as far as you knew, who her daughter had been seen with or who she had last been known to be with?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did she tell you?

C. CROES: Specifically, she told me that her daughter went to Carlos and Charlie's, and that, while there, she had met up with a young guy and asked him to take her home, and that she got into a small silver or gray car that had a large exhaust on the back and tinted windows, and had left.

http://tinyurl.com/3yatzf

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jorans June 10th statement seems to state otherwise though  :roll:

To your question as to what kind of car Deepak has, I answer you the following. Deepak has a silver, four door car of the make Honda Civic. The windows of the car are not tinted. Betto drives a green coloured four door car of the make Honda Civic.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 01, 2007, 11:22:57 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Look at what they found on Aruba after renho got off the videophone  :lol: :

(http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l286/yapperz1/teeth.gif)



 :smt119  :smt119 LOL Yapperz! :smt119  :smt119


  YAP  ROFLMAO

 And I am the bad one here?  ha ha  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:23:49 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Ohh.  And remember we had a lot of discussion about interiors of cars.  Like there were some photos of inside of cars, and sometimes you could see someone just outside the car.  Window tint was discussed then too, I think.  And we were trying to figure out what kind of car etc.  Whew.  It's been so long...


I remember that discussion, Dutchlady was here at the time


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:24:01 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE


when the DUTCH SOLVE IT = HEROES


DUTCH DONT  Solve it = FOREVER LINKED with the CORRPTION


naw..............

BET it all  8)


Very true!  They have layed there necks on this one.



its like the story of the wild cat chasing the bird...

who has more incentive

the cat to eat

OR

the bird to run and get away


the BIRDS life is at stake... its all over if he gets caught

just another meal to the cat


the BIRD MOVES FASTER

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:26:38 PM
SOLVE IT  --------------- heroes


DONT SOLVE IT.........forever linked with JORAN, PAULUS, K2, ANITA
DOMPIG, CROES ETC ETC ETC ETC


no brainer


done---- put a fork in it

when does the trial start  ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:26:52 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
VAN SUSTEREN: Did Beth have any idea at that point, as far as you knew, who her daughter had been seen with or who she had last been known to be with?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did she tell you?

C. CROES: Specifically, she told me that her daughter went to Carlos and Charlie's, and that, while there, she had met up with a young guy and asked him to take her home, and that she got into a small silver or gray car that had a large exhaust on the back and tinted windows, and had left.

http://tinyurl.com/3yatzf

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jorans June 10th statement seems to state otherwise though  :roll:

To your question as to what kind of car Deepak has, I answer you the following. Deepak has a silver, four door car of the make Honda Civic. The windows of the car are not tinted. Betto drives a green coloured four door car of the make Honda Civic.


BINGO!  I guess my memory is not as short as I thought!  That's where I heard that.  My personal opinion is that Deepak has exchanged that car with another and then another to the point where the car that Natalee stepped into no longer exists.  Deepak's original car that Natalee rode in was customized, probably by him and some friends.  So, it stands to reason that after that night, he would remove any incriminating evidence even if he had to switch the car with another, change out the windows, seats, headliner and any other parts.  So, I don't put much faith in the identification of that car cuz I think he purposely switched it out to hide evidence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:27:06 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say muffs?  :shock:

Where did we hear about the windows?  From whom?  I know, dead horse, yada, yada, yada.... :roll:

Did you ask or did I read it incorrectly(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/14fd14d4.gif)


Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 01, 2007, 11:27:42 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/az5.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/az5.gif

I'm trying to catch up...................be with you guys shortly! Wow! ya'll have been busy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:27:46 PM
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:28:26 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/az5.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/az5.gif

I'm trying to catch up...................be with you guys shortly! Wow! ya'll have been busy!




i will slow down  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:28:34 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
VAN SUSTEREN: Did Beth have any idea at that point, as far as you knew, who her daughter had been seen with or who she had last been known to be with?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did she tell you?

C. CROES: Specifically, she told me that her daughter went to Carlos and Charlie's, and that, while there, she had met up with a young guy and asked him to take her home, and that she got into a small silver or gray car that had a large exhaust on the back and tinted windows, and had left.

http://tinyurl.com/3yatzf

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jorans June 10th statement seems to state otherwise though  :roll:

To your question as to what kind of car Deepak has, I answer you the following. Deepak has a silver, four door car of the make Honda Civic. The windows of the car are not tinted. Betto drives a green coloured four door car of the make Honda Civic.

BB
Great find... are you after Klaasend job ?

TO ME.. For Beth to tell Charles... she had to get the info from one of the kids on the trip that saw here in the car.
Was this posted on the Aruba Site.. where someone was asking how to get in touch with the Aruban police  DAY #1?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:29:19 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
VAN SUSTEREN: Did Beth have any idea at that point, as far as you knew, who her daughter had been seen with or who she had last been known to be with?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did she tell you?

C. CROES: Specifically, she told me that her daughter went to Carlos and Charlie's, and that, while there, she had met up with a young guy and asked him to take her home, and that she got into a small silver or gray car that had a large exhaust on the back and tinted windows, and had left.

http://tinyurl.com/3yatzf

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jorans June 10th statement seems to state otherwise though  :roll:

To your question as to what kind of car Deepak has, I answer you the following. Deepak has a silver, four door car of the make Honda Civic. The windows of the car are not tinted. Betto drives a green coloured four door car of the make Honda Civic.



And then the car on the truck being towed in by ALE doesn't have them.

Go figure!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:29:21 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
VAN SUSTEREN: Did Beth have any idea at that point, as far as you knew, who her daughter had been seen with or who she had last been known to be with?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did she tell you?

C. CROES: Specifically, she told me that her daughter went to Carlos and Charlie's, and that, while there, she had met up with a young guy and asked him to take her home, and that she got into a small silver or gray car that had a large exhaust on the back and tinted windows, and had left.

http://tinyurl.com/3yatzf

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jorans June 10th statement seems to state otherwise though  :roll:

To your question as to what kind of car Deepak has, I answer you the following. Deepak has a silver, four door car of the make Honda Civic. The windows of the car are not tinted. Betto drives a green coloured four door car of the make Honda Civic.

BB
Great find... are you after Klaasend job ?

TO ME.. For Beth to tell Charles... she had to get the info from one of the kids on the trip that saw here in the car.
Was this posted on the Aruba Site.. where someone was asking how to get in touch with the Aruban police  DAY #1?


Just got lucky this time  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:29:33 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/az5.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/az5.gif

I'm trying to catch up...................be with you guys shortly! Wow! ya'll have been busy!

Oh wow, CBB!!! That's awesome!  I love it.  I love the tophat and especially the fireworks.  You are amazing!  Thanks so much.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:29:44 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
VAN SUSTEREN: Did Beth have any idea at that point, as far as you knew, who her daughter had been seen with or who she had last been known to be with?

C. CROES: Yes.

VAN SUSTEREN: What did she tell you?

C. CROES: Specifically, she told me that her daughter went to Carlos and Charlie's, and that, while there, she had met up with a young guy and asked him to take her home, and that she got into a small silver or gray car that had a large exhaust on the back and tinted windows, and had left.

http://tinyurl.com/3yatzf

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jorans June 10th statement seems to state otherwise though  :roll:

To your question as to what kind of car Deepak has, I answer you the following. Deepak has a silver, four door car of the make Honda Civic. The windows of the car are not tinted. Betto drives a green coloured four door car of the make Honda Civic.


This is exactly what I was about to tell everyone.  Joran claims the car did not have tinted windows.  Why does Joran mention that they are NOT tinted?  The only reason to mention it would be if they were indeed tinted.  Fishy story there...ulterior motive of which I can't decide.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 11:30:07 PM
From the World Journier site:

(snipped)

On 5-30 at 10:30 AM when NATALEE was first noticed as not being present many of the Mountain Brook high school classmates described to the chaperones that NATALEE was last seen with a boy who had always told the classmates that he was a DUTCH, foreign exchange student and tourist who said he was staying at the “Holiday Inn” as a tourist. The DUTCH foreign exchange student and tourist is described as tall, dark-haired, and that NATALEE was last seen with him outside of "Carlos 'N Charlie's" at about 1:00 AM getting into a small, silver or gray car with tinted windows and an oversized muffler

(snipped)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:31:03 PM
OF wrote;
Quote
Was this posted on the Aruba Site.. where someone was asking how to get in touch with the Aruban police DAY #1?


Yes, it was posted on one of the aruba bulletin board sites.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:31:30 PM
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


But why peel it off?  Was there something on it?  OR was it a different car?

Just wondering.  Maybe those ants got on the tinted windows?

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:31:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


But why peel it off?  Was there something on it?  OR was it a different car?

Just wondering.  Maybe those ants got on the tinted windows?

 :roll:


BLOOD


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:31:58 PM
I have always maintained that you can't see who's in a car with tinted windows.  This is why the pond witness couldn't tell who was in back...the windows were tinted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:32:19 PM
hmmmm  I wonder what the dates are when Deepak took his car into Enterprise and left it there for the few days.  

Isn't Enterprise the company Deepak spoke to one of the employees/owners about Natalee's drivers license and $50?

The Dutch KLPD should question him about what all was done to Deepaks car and what all Deepak spoke to him about Natalee or Natalee's personal belonging..ect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:32:40 PM
tinted

illegal in some states


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:33:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From the World Journier site:

(snipped)

On 5-30 at 10:30 AM when NATALEE was first noticed as not being present many of the Mountain Brook high school classmates described to the chaperones that NATALEE was last seen with a boy who had always told the classmates that he was a DUTCH, foreign exchange student and tourist who said he was staying at the “Holiday Inn” as a tourist. The DUTCH foreign exchange student and tourist is described as tall, dark-haired, and that NATALEE was last seen with him outside of "Carlos 'N Charlie's" at about 1:00 AM getting into a small, silver or gray car with tinted windows and an oversized muffler

(snipped)


?  
if the car was at the back of C&C's who saw her get in?
vs..  the kids at the bus stop describing  the car..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:33:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From the World Journier site:

(snipped)

On 5-30 at 10:30 AM when NATALEE was first noticed as not being present many of the Mountain Brook high school classmates described to the chaperones that NATALEE was last seen with a boy who had always told the classmates that he was a DUTCH, foreign exchange student and tourist who said he was staying at the “Holiday Inn” as a tourist. The DUTCH foreign exchange student and tourist is described as tall, dark-haired, and that NATALEE was last seen with him outside of "Carlos 'N Charlie's" at about 1:00 AM getting into a small, silver or gray car with tinted windows and an oversized muffler

(snipped)


?  
if the car was at the back of C&C's who saw her get in?
vs..  the kids at the bus stop describing  the car..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:33:45 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have always maintained that you can't see who's in a car with tinted windows.  This is why the pond witness couldn't tell who was in back...the windows were tinted.


Yes, and Joran was in the front seat in the drivers seat and prolly had his window rolled down.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:34:53 PM
It's not too hard to change out the entire window.  I have glass coverage on my cars, and in AZ there are a lot of rocks on the roads.  Flying rocks break windshields all the time.  I call the glass company and they come out to the house and change out the windshield when it breaks, again.  It takes the guys about 20 minutes, start to finish, and I have a new windshield.  Same for side and back windows, but they rarely take a stone and crack.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:35:01 PM
<------------waving to the DUTCH INVESTIGATORS


we know you can do it  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:35:26 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


But why peel it off?  Was there something on it?  OR was it a different car?

Just wondering.  Maybe those ants got on the tinted windows?

 :roll:


BLOOD



Exactly and or vomit  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:36:18 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have always maintained that you can't see who's in a car with tinted windows.  This is why the pond witness couldn't tell who was in back...the windows were tinted.


Maybe they were rolled down?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:36:21 PM
I'm just saying don't get too hung up on identifying a car by the windows as these are easily changed out and replaced.  Same with seats, headliners, carpeting, stereos, and lots of other parts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:36:39 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


But why peel it off?  Was there something on it?  OR was it a different car?

Just wondering.  Maybe those ants got on the tinted windows?

 :roll:


BLOOD



Exactly and or vomit  :(



Yep!  And they just peeled it off, maybe even that night when they were washing the car at 3 am.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:36:41 PM
:oops:  hick up  :oops:
was adding this  would have be the 1st reference


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:38:07 PM
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:38:10 PM
OF is this the original post you were asking about from the bulletin board?

++++++++++++++++++

 Unhappy  HELP - POLICE?! how to contact?!
I cannot find any web address info for police stations in Aruba. I am trying to get info on their current investigation on the DISAPPEARANCE (ABDUCTION? MURDER?) of a teenaged girl during our local high school's trip to Aruba. How can I reach them?!

The child's mother has flown to Aruba to help look for her. Our only source for information is the travel agent, who is not receiving much info, either. None of us is getting direct info from the police. I have searched but cannot find any internet info on how to contact them directly.

I was encouraged to read that just a week or so ago, the Aruba police did solve a kidnapping case, rescuing two sisters. I hope we have the same result. (It sounds as if they are moving swiftly on the case.) Meanwhile we are all losing our minds with grief and worry. It would help to get some official word.

Our travel agent assured us as parents that our children would be safe in Aruba on this chaperoned trip. Yet now that this tragedy has occurred, I have since heard from others that this sort of thing happens all the time. Is this true?!

I hope some of you can direct me to official sources. Meanwhile, we will appreciate your prayers for the safe return of this young girl.

http://tinyurl.com/323t43


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:38:13 PM
OF, try drinking a glass of water bent over from the waist for those hiccups!   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:39:25 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
OF, try drinking a glass of water bent over from the waist for those hiccups!   :D


LOOKING AT RENFRO for 4 minutes should skeeeeeeeeeer
the HICCUPS away  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:40:28 PM
im sure there are pictures of the PIMP MOBILE

with tinted windows


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:40:32 PM
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487



Well, by June 10, they were untinted.  They already peeled it off.

I do hope that car is still around somewhere and the Dutch have it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:42:09 PM
We also have a lot of car theft here in AZ--I know, it's got other good features, but the crime is a bummer.  The car thieves here can dismantle a car and have the parts on the way to Mexico in 10 minutes flat.  They busted a chop-shop near my college a week or two ago where quite of few cars in the college's parking lots ended up.  Thriving little business, it is.  Anyway, my point is that these people who work on cars, dismantle them and reassemble the body parts so easily it would amaze you.  We identify the car by it's appearance, but that is not reliable.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:42:13 PM
O, wait, remember they used the actual car for the reinactment and actually supposedly shipped the thing to Holland for the filming.  Deepak tried to get a lot of money for that?

I do hope while they had it in Holland a REAL search was finally done.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 01, 2007, 11:42:57 PM
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


I mentioned peel off stuff without your extra details, on page 5, but guess it went into the crapper....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:43:38 PM
I have my doubts that the car they confiscated that they thought was Deepak's was actually the car that Natalee rode in that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:43:42 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
We also have a lot of car theft here in AZ--I know, it's got other good features, but the crime is a bummer.  The car thieves here can dismantle a car and have the parts on the way to Mexico in 10 minutes flat.  They busted a chop-shop near my college a week or two ago where quite of few cars in the college's parking lots ended up.  Thriving little business, it is.  Anyway, my point is that these people who work on cars, dismantle them and reassemble the body parts so easily it would amaze you.  We identify the car by it's appearance, but that is not reliable.



Lots of VIN numbers in different locations throughout a car these days.  Hope Dutch forensics have looked it over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:43:50 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487



Well, by June 10, they were untinted.  They already peeled it off.

I do hope that car is still around somewhere and the Dutch have it.

.


yes, but someone has pictures of it  8)
they cleaned  it every 15 minutes

they loved that car  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:43:58 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have always maintained that you can't see who's in a car with tinted windows.  This is why the pond witness couldn't tell who was in back...the windows were tinted.


Yes, and Joran was in the front seat in the drivers seat and prolly had his window rolled down.


I think we all can guess why Joran was in the front seat (if he was)
The Skeeters tape? Did Deepak ever deny that the gardner saw them or just semi say his brother was the one that could not be identified.
something  like  ... they could not tell who was in the back seat... ya my brother ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:43:59 PM
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487


As further proof that ALE did not intend to solve this case from the very beginning...why after asking Joran about Deepak's car did they not ask Deepak about his windows?  I don't think I remember that being asked in any of those statements.  Never any follow up questions...ever.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:44:31 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


I mentioned peel off stuff without your extra details, on page 5, but guess it went into the crapper....


i saw that

you were RIGHT on the money  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 01, 2007, 11:44:54 PM
A little from Greta - 5/1/07:

Greta:  Dave how are you.

Dave:  Well the first few days I was very very nervous because the FBI told him they were going to do a search on the property but they could not disclose the location.  But when he turned on the news on Friday morning low and behold it was the Van der Sloot residence so you get very concerned and nervous that one of the suspects they are digging holes and stuff up in his yard you know.

Greta:  Have you heard from them since they gave you the sort of the alert that there was going to be a search.

Dave:  The FBI indicated to Dave if they came up with anything they would be the first ones to get a call.

Greta:  So I take it since you haven’t heard from them at least you concluded the search turned up nothing.

Dave:  That’s correct.

Greta:  Prior to Thursday when you got the word they were going to do the search on Friday when have you last heard from the Dutch Authorities or the FBI or the Aruban Authorities.

Dave:  You know the Dutch took over the investigation approximately September/October of last year.  We heard about that and that was the last communication we really had and they have been very very secretive about what they were doing and what actions they were taking.  I was getting a little concerned that nothing was going on and they all of a sudden they came on the island a couple of weeks ago.  Approximately eight investigators from what I understand and the news media on the island started following them around and we heard they interviewed several people and then all of a sudden they start the searching.

Greta:  Dave I don’t mean to be a wet blanket but you said they came on the scene last September/October 06 and you said that they’ve been very secretive until they did this search.  What makes you think they have been doing anything at all?  I mean it doesn’t take a lot to do this search and it’s been about six or seven months.  Do you think they have been even doing anything?

Dave:  You know that’s a good question.  I understood that they obtained all the documents and started reviewing those the Holland investigative team and then of course we were wondering when they would ever go back to Aruba and then they finally did it a couple of weeks ago.

Greta:  What would you like the Dutch to do?

Dave:  I would like for them to solve the case obviously but I think what they are really doing is going over some areas where they felt like the investigation was not done in the proper manner.

Greta:  In term of Joran, Deepak and Satish you know what questions would you like to put directly to them.

Dave:  Well obviously I would want them to tell the truth and disclose and disclose what happened to Natalee and what kind of condition she was in when she was supposedly left at the beach.  You know I don’t really buy that story but just certainly ask them to come clean.

Greta:  Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach.  I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave:  In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta:  And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave:  Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.

Greta:  It’s now almost been two years.  Two years at the end of this month.  Every day do you think about this are you consumed about this case.

Dave:  Yes, you think about it every day.  You try and stay busy at work and try and do other things but when you get by yourself or a lull moment it pops in your mind and you start trying to figure out exactly what happened.

Greta:  And in terms of KJ who was the prosecutor who is now back in Holland.  She never sat down and briefed you, she claims that she couldn’t but she never did brief you on what they did learn.

Dave:  Well no I think John has made some attempts to speak with her and he’s got a pretty good idea himself of what has happened but no noting.  I think they got into a situation where a lot of documents were leaked out and they’ve tried to keep that from happening again.

Greta:  Well Dave I can tell you I get ton of emails every single day and everyone really wants you, Natalee, Robin and Jug get your answers that you should have them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:45:21 PM
I also believe that's why the samples taken to Holland came back identified as chocolate and cleaning fluid.  These samples were taken from a car seat that had most likely been in a rental car seat and put into what they thought was Deepak's car.  Wonder if they thought to compare VIN's or even checked on what Deepak's VIN was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:46:06 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


I mentioned peel off stuff without your extra details, on page 5, but guess it went into the crapper....


i saw that

you were RIGHT on the money  :wink:


Yep, the old peel and stick.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 01, 2007, 11:46:21 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
OF, try drinking a glass of water bent over from the waist for those hiccups!   :D
:lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:47:06 PM
Joran 6/10:

To your question has to how many years Deepak and Satish have been living on Aruba, I answer you that Deepak has been living on Aruba for five (5) years and Satish three (3) years.

Why would Deepak and Satish not come to Aruba at the same time?  Did we ever discuss this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 11:47:56 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - YOUTUBE OF TONIGHTS GRETA:

Natalee Holloway Investigation, “On The Record,” … Julia Renfro and Dave Holloway


www.scaredmonkeys.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:49:40 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
OF is this the original post you were asking about from the bulletin board?
<<Snip>>

http://tinyurl.com/323t43

Thanks BB...
Thats what I was thinking about... never saw it before.. just knew it existed.  
Wonder when Klaasend's post  from WJ  was posted there


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:49:45 PM
San!  

Oh, WoW!  Beautiful transcript!  Even when I watch, I want to read and see if I heard what I thought I heard.

Thank you so much!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:50:37 PM
Thanks, San.  You do a magnificent job of transcribing.  No one can duplicate your work.  Bravo!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 01, 2007, 11:50:40 PM
Thanks San!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 01, 2007, 11:51:50 PM
Thanks San, you really do a great job.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:52:46 PM
thanks san


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:52:50 PM
Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.

I love this quote!   Yes, everything always comes back to Joran and the 2K's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 01, 2007, 11:53:08 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


I mentioned peel off stuff without your extra details, on page 5, but guess it went into the crapper....



Awww sorry 2NJSons_Mom...but I know how you feel. It happens to me at times too, or flat out right ignored or just passed over as if not here. But, at least they are adding to it and taking from what you said.  :wink:  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 01, 2007, 11:53:48 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "AZLady"
OF, try drinking a glass of water bent over from the waist for those hiccups!   :D


LOOKING AT RENFRO for 4 minutes should skeeeeeeeeeer
the HICCUPS away  8)

Robots
Do I have to do it for 4 minutes... how about 10 seconds
I'm  skeered  I might turn to stone or salt :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 01, 2007, 11:54:02 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487



Well, by June 10, they were untinted.  They already peeled it off.

I do hope that car is still around somewhere and the Dutch have it.

.


I wish I could find that re-enactment clip....used to be on youtube, swear I recall Deepak's car looking like it had tinted windows.

The other thing though, is that the lighting in general around C+C's especially some of the side streets is not exactly bright. IMO it would be possible to view a small car , under those lights, with four occupants , and the darkened interior may have made the windows appear tinted? Does that make any sense? The reason I say that is when watching the re-enactment video-the windows dooooo appear tinted, but I think they are not. Sorry it is coming back to me very slowly. Getting near sign off time. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:54:41 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "robots"
peel off  TINTED stuff



its cheap and K2 are cheeeeeesy  8)


I mentioned peel off stuff without your extra details, on page 5, but guess it went into the crapper....



Awww sorry 2NJSons_Mom...but I know how you feel. It happens to me at times too, or flat out right ignored or just passed over as if not here. But, at least they are adding to it and taking from what you said.  :wink:  :)



yep

2nj NAILED IT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:56:20 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "AZLady"
OF, try drinking a glass of water bent over from the waist for those hiccups!   :D


LOOKING AT RENFRO for 4 minutes should skeeeeeeeeeer
the HICCUPS away  8)

Robots
Do I have to do it for 4 minutes... how about 10 seconds
I'm  skeered  I might turn to stone or salt :wink:


10 SECONDS WILL MAKE YOU PUKE

30 seconds makes you dizzy

you need the full treatment  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:56:50 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487



Well, by June 10, they were untinted.  They already peeled it off.

I do hope that car is still around somewhere and the Dutch have it.

.


I wish I could find that re-enactment clip....used to be on youtube, swear I recall Deepak's car looking like it had tinted windows.

The other thing though, is that the lighting in general around C+C's especially some of the side streets is not exactly bright. IMO it would be possible to view a small car , under those lights, with four occupants , and the darkened interior may have made the windows appear tinted? Does that make any sense? The reason I say that is when watching the re-enactment video-the windows dooooo appear tinted, but I think they are not. Sorry it is coming back to me very slowly. Getting near sign off time. :shock:


im with ya


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Red on May 01, 2007, 11:57:06 PM
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:57:55 PM
I think I'll find my monkey bunky now.  Keep the faith, friends.  It will happen.  Listen to ROBOTS--that's one smart Monkey.

See ya all tomorrow. (now I'm talking like a Sutherner!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 01, 2007, 11:58:10 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


GUTLESS GRETA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 01, 2007, 11:59:00 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


Red, I think Greta got Monkey-Mailed today.  She's seen the light!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 01, 2007, 11:59:02 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:



LOL!  She said she still gets emails!  Yes, she certainly does, lots of them, too!  

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 01, 2007, 11:59:09 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


Red what are we gonna do about Julia Renfro taking Jossy's spot on greta's spin the record? :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 02, 2007, 12:00:11 AM
Here is a link to the re-enactment in which Deepaks car was used if anyone is interested in viewing.

http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/video_photos.cfm?id=32411&video_id=577&quality=high


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:00:26 AM
Quote from: AZLady
I think I'll find my monkey bunky now.  Keep the faith, friends.  It will happen.  Listen to ROBOTS--that's one smart Monkey.

See ya all tomorrow. (now I'm talking like a Sutherner!)[/quote

But that's a GOOD thing, AZLady!

Some people have implied that I do, too.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:00:32 AM
Frankly, Greta and Renfroe deserve each other.  The work they do has nothing to do with news and everything to do with misinformation and their own personal agendas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:00:32 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
I think I'll find my monkey bunky now.  Keep the faith, friends.  It will happen.  Listen to ROBOTS--that's one smart Monkey.

See ya all tomorrow. (now I'm talking like a Sutherner!)


either really smart or really crazy  8)


im gonna BET the FARM on mYSELF  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:00:47 AM
Frankly, Greta and Renfroe deserve each other.  The work they do has nothing to do with news and everything to do with misinformation and their own personal agendas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 12:01:02 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487


As further proof that ALE did not intend to solve this case from the very beginning...why after asking Joran about Deepak's car did they not ask Deepak about his windows?  I don't think I remember that being asked in any of those statements.  Never any follow up questions...ever.  :roll:

Im falling way behind... as usual
To me Beth got her info from the MB kids.  that were at the bus stop and saw Natalee in the car. How many noticed the windows.. what was the lighting like etc.

I'm more interested why they did not PUSH the issue of the fisherman's huts after Joarn (apparently) brought it up in his 1st interview on 5/31 and the Kalpoes said ...What stop at the Hut's the same day.

No searches.. no blood-hound type dogs, nothing until they are detained.
 :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 02, 2007, 12:01:30 AM
Time for bed. G'Night everyone!

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:01:30 AM
Quote from: Anna
Quote from: "AZLady"
I think I'll find my monkey bunky now.  Keep the faith, friends.  It will happen.  Listen to ROBOTS--that's one smart Monkey.

See ya all tomorrow. (now I'm talking like a Sutherner!)[/quote

But that's a GOOD thing, AZLady!

Some people have implied that I do, too.

 :D


Yes, it does feel very good, Anna!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:03:07 AM
Good night now, for good!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:03:15 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


If she didn't say it, she implied it with her "WE know they left her at the beach" she throws in there as though that were a fact.  I would assume the we in that sentence would mean the family or at least Law Enforcement.  

Maybe the 'We" who know that are her, Joe T and Julia!

Don't think anybody else is buying it.

I wonder how many emails total she received today.   I think I sent three because I assumed she wouldn't read but her staff might count.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on May 02, 2007, 12:03:36 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Here is a link to the re-enactment in which Deepaks car was used if anyone is interested in viewing.

http://www.amw.com/missing_persons/video_photos.cfm?id=32411&video_id=577&quality=high


Oh forget it, it doesn't show but the very very begining. Goodnight all, my Monkey brains are mush :wink:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:04:08 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
joran says they were not TINTED


what is that ??

LIE NUMBER 487


As further proof that ALE did not intend to solve this case from the very beginning...why after asking Joran about Deepak's car did they not ask Deepak about his windows?  I don't think I remember that being asked in any of those statements.  Never any follow up questions...ever.  :roll:

Im falling way behind... as usual
To me Beth got her info from the MB kids.  that were at the bus stop and saw Natalee in the car. How many noticed the windows.. what was the lighting like etc.

I'm more interested why they did not PUSH the issue of the fisherman's huts after Joarn (apparently) brought it up in his 1st interview on 5/31 and the Kalpoes said ...What stop at the Hut's the same day.

No searches.. no blood-hound type dogs, nothing until they are detained.
 :twisted:  :twisted:


im with ya on this one


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:04:29 AM
******* - Jossy says he's going to refuse going on Greta's show after last night. It was posted on Easy's blog. Greta probably expected Jossy and got Refro instead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Red on May 02, 2007, 12:04:39 AM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


Red what are we gonna do about Julia Renfro taking Jossy's spot on greta's spin the record? :cry:


Every so often you need to hear the other side.

Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

You will notice she was pretty calm tonight and admitted the places that the Dutch were searching were obvious spots to search.

Of course the question to JR should have been, well then why wasn't it done before and why didn't Aruba Today write articles stating so? Instead of taking wedding pictures of the Saperstein wedding.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 12:05:31 AM
SAN
Thanks for the transcript... great job.

I forgot about the Dutch having and review all the files
I hope they were reviewing the files and pulling the hair saying WTF was ALE doing or even thinging.. Why did they NOT.....

We we have been


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:05:58 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:


If she didn't say it, she implied it with her "WE know they left her at the beach" she throws in there as though that were a fact.  I would assume the we in that sentence would mean the family or at least Law Enforcement.  

Maybe the 'We" who know that are her, Joe T and Julia!

Don't think anybody else is buying it.

I wonder how many emails total she received today.   I think I sent three because I assumed she wouldn't read but her staff might count.

.


i sent several



DOZEN


i was steaming

it was the same letter several times


DOZEN that is


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Red on May 02, 2007, 12:06:32 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - Jossy says he's going to refuse going on Greta's show after last night. It was posted on Easy's blog. Greta probably expected Jossy and got Refro instead.


Well Jossy knows he is always welcome here.

That was incredibly unprofessional how he was treated on her show last night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:07:50 AM
I don't blame Jossy for not going on Greta.  I hate listening to Renfro though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 12:08:15 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Good night now, for good!


G'nite AZLady..
Sorry you caught my hick-up :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:10:28 AM
@ San's transcription and all those who typed parts of the program

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/thtna.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 12:11:06 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't blame Jossy for not going on Greta.  I hate listening to Renfro though.


I dont blame Jossy either but Julia Renfro?? She has lost all credibility!!Why cant she get Tito Lacle?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Red on May 02, 2007, 12:11:26 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't blame Jossy for not going on Greta.  I hate listening to Renfro though.


I would advise Jossy to reconsider. If he does that then Greta gets her agenda by doing so. Natalee and justice loses a voice which is exactly what Joe Tacopina and camp VDS want.

Dealing with this stuff is never easy. The bullets and arrows come from everywhere, including people from pro-Natalee sites.

Jossy has think skin and will be back I am sure. Although, he can always provide SM and The Dana Pretzer Show with exclusive breaking news, instead of Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:11:35 AM
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:12:16 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...



 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:12:37 AM
Also, Lala's wondered why Deepak and Satish have been on Aruba at different times.  She got divorced and moved to Aruba.  Deepak came with her but her mother wanted to keep Satish because he was young and when he got older, he decided to come to Aruba to stay with them as she is now married and had a job and could afford for Satish to come there and attend a private (good school, she says).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 12:12:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
@ San's transcription and all those who typed parts of the program

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/thtna.jpg)


Thanks Anna and everyone else.

I felt bad that Jacqueline lost her transcript in the last thread because I hurried it along to page 50.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:12:54 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - Jossy says he's going to refuse going on Greta's show after last night. It was posted on Easy's blog. Greta probably expected Jossy and got Refro instead.


Well Jossy knows he is always welcome here.

That was incredibly unprofessional how he was treated on her show last night.


And a couple of nights ago, the way Dr Michael Baden was shouted down by Joe T was totally out of order.  Just dreadful way to treat such a distinguished person.

Greta did nothing to stop that, either.  She lets Joe T hog the time that should be allotted to others.  And she always gives him the last word, too.

It is just too biased!  Tonight there was some slight improvement.  I hope Jossy gave her an ear full!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 12:14:53 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't blame Jossy for not going on Greta.  I hate listening to Renfro though.


I would advise Jossy to reconsider. If he does that then Greta gets her agenda by doing so. Natalee and justice loses a voice which is exactly what Joe Tacopina and camp VDS want.

Dealing with this stuff is never easy. The bullets and arrows come from everywhere, including people from pro-Natalee sites.

Jossy has think skin and will be back I am sure. Although, he can always provide SM and The Dana Pretzer Show with exclusive breaking news, instead of Greta.


I agree totally. You can't replace Jossy..I know he will be on other shows but Greta gets the most airtime on this story. I hope he comes back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:14:55 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't blame Jossy for not going on Greta.  I hate listening to Renfro though.


I would advise Jossy to reconsider. If he does that then Greta gets her agenda by doing so. Natalee and justice loses a voice which is exactly what Joe Tacopina and camp VDS want.

Dealing with this stuff is never easy. The bullets and arrows come from everywhere, including people from pro-Natalee sites.

Jossy has think skin and will be back I am sure. Although, he can always provide SM and The Dana Pretzer Show with exclusive breaking news, instead of Greta.


Much as I understand Jossy's reluctance to deal with such ignorant and thick-headed people, I do agree with what you say, Red.  We need Jossy's voice for Natalee and Beth and Dave.  Without his level-headed, factual reports, all there is are voices like Greta's who check neither fact nor reason before opening their mouths.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:16:33 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...

Thanks AZLady


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:16:44 AM
i hope JOSSY avoids that HAG like the PLAGUE

goes on another channel


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:16:59 AM
Anna, you are so right.  The way Tacky treated Dr. Baden was disgraceful and I said so in my email to Greta today (or was it yesterday?  I forget.).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:17:40 AM
its one thing for a reporter to make a mistake
they can correct it on a later SHOW or the same show

but she has been MISERABLE with her facts and her stupid OPINIONS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:17:46 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...

Thanks AZLady


Psst...thank Tyler--she's feeding me info on the sly!  (wink, wink)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Red on May 02, 2007, 12:17:51 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
******* - Jossy says he's going to refuse going on Greta's show after last night. It was posted on Easy's blog. Greta probably expected Jossy and got Refro instead.


Well Jossy knows he is always welcome here.

That was incredibly unprofessional how he was treated on her show last night.


And a couple of nights ago, the way Dr Michael Baden was shouted down by Joe T was totally out of order.  Just dreadful way to treat such a distinguished person.

Greta did nothing to stop that, either.  She lets Joe T hog the time that should be allotted to others.  And she always gives him the last word, too.

It is just too biased!  Tonight there was some slight improvement.  I hope Jossy gave her an ear full!

.


Its kind of the problem with all cable news today. Its not about news or investigative journalism. Its about shock news. Its about pitting people against each other and hoping it becomes a Jerry Springer event.

Its about opinion instead of fact.

Its about producers sticking a camera in the face of someone who just lost a loved one and asking how they feel.

Its about news stringers reading the blogs to see what people are intereted in rather than researching stories.

The media has become a ratings shame.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:18:23 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
@ San's transcription and all those who typed parts of the program

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/thtna.jpg)


Thanks Anna and everyone else.

I felt bad that Jacqueline lost her transcript in the last thread because I hurried it along to page 50.

Oh geeze - I didn't realize that happened.  I feel bad too.  I was running back and forth watching the thread and the TV in the other room and didn't realize that happened.

If you see this....sorry Jacqueline!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:18:46 AM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...


But...but...how can that be Joran's car?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 12:21:24 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...


But...but...how can that be Joran's car?

Does anyone think it was Joran's car all the while.  Maybe Deepak was using that car to drive Joran around because he didn't have his license yet.  Just a thought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:21:36 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...


But...but...how can that be Joran's car?


Yes, I wonder. Maybe it's known as "Joran's car" because he drives it all the time.  I've always thought that Joran and the 2K's were an odd couple.  Strange business arrangement there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 12:21:56 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...


But...but...how can that be Joran's car?


Agreed..He barely knew Deepak..Only what 3 months?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: casa on May 02, 2007, 12:22:19 AM
I know I am just getting here and I haven't had time to read back and I need to go to bed, but did anyone notice that Greta left out Beth when she was tellling Dave that she wanted answers for him, Robin and Jug?  Please don't fuss at me if this has been discussed! :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:22:40 AM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi...like a bad penny, I'm back.

Remember this?
I already knew who and what we were looking for, a car with tinted windows, silver colored.  I got that information before I left MB.
 
Charles went to the beach and asked the kids who had a silver car with loud stereo system, car with tinted windows and he was told, "that's Joran's car...


But...but...how can that be Joran's car?


Agreed..He barely knew Deepak..Only what 3 months?


Well, you know how "business" pulls people together.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:23:22 AM
Well, I for one am glad that Jossy stuck by his decision.  I think Greta needs to apologize to him and then maybe he will reconsider.  Anything less and Greta gets her way.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:24:21 AM
Quote from: "casa"
I know I am just getting here and I haven't had time to read back and I need to go to bed, but did anyone notice that Greta left out Beth when she was tellling Dave that she wanted answers for him, Robin and Jug?  Please don't fuss at me if this has been discussed! :cry:

Hi Casa.  I think she just slipped up and said Natalee when she meant Beth.  Greta had quite a full email box today and it wasn't all happy, happy, joy, joy with her "reporting."  I think she was a little subdued tonight and probably had a lot on her mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:25:44 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, I for one am glad that Jossy stuck by his decision.  I think Greta needs to apologize to him and then maybe he will reconsider.  Anything less and Greta gets her way.


I think Greta needs to invite Jossy on the show again and this time, let him set the conditions.  Allow him to be the last word and no interruptions!  Treat him with respect and courtesy and maybe he will reconsider.  Seems fair to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 12:25:50 AM
Goodnight Everyone


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 12:26:40 AM
Night, San.  I'm outa here, too.  See ya all tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:27:45 AM
I find it hard to believe that the Sloots, with all their fawning over the sporter, would not have him a car.  License or not.  He had a line of credit at the casino, drank underage, and never got in trouble.  What's the big deal with driving without a license?  If you get my drift here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:27:56 AM
Nite San - thanks!

Nite AZlady


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:28:34 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I find it hard to believe that the Sloots, with all their fawning over the sporter, would not have him a car.  License or not.  He had a line of credit at the casino, drank underage, and never got in trouble.  What's the big deal with driving without a license?  If you get my drift here.

I agree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:30:45 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I find it hard to believe that the Sloots, with all their fawning over the sporter, would not have him a car.  License or not.  He had a line of credit at the casino, drank underage, and never got in trouble.  What's the big deal with driving without a license?  If you get my drift here.

I agree



Well, I once found a photo of Joran at an amusement park pretending to drive one of those little fake cars.

Remember that Klaas?  I thought I had caught him for sure!

It was fake, they don't even move but what boy that old poses in something like that like a little kid.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:30:53 AM
I promised myself I would hug Nemo earlier tonight.  So here goes. {{{{{HUG}}}}} :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 12:31:31 AM
Klaas...You have anything together we can send Greta about Julia Renfro? It would be nice for her or her producers to know who they are dealing with.

I thought Tito did some honest reporting. Arlene Schipper was caught lying last time. She called Beth a liar and that she persoanlly saw her meeting with KJ. That never happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 12:32:00 AM
I am lost. But for good reason to help another poster out.  :)

 I was on, not sure of the page about Deepaks car.. I went to post.. and got lost  again
  IIRC I know at least . it was listed on EBAY for sale???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:32:25 AM
Yes, it just wasn't the same without Jossy.

I hope he will reconsider.  Even though Greta was subdued and not telling her beach lies, I would like to have asked Jossy so much what the Dutch team did today.

 :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 12:34:51 AM
Lala's, if you are still around...I sent you an email...yahoo address, a few hours ago...when you can.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:34:56 AM
Well, Jacquie gets a rose and a thank you, too, even if she lost hers.  And others who commented during the program help as well.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Prayer%20Thanks%20Compliment/untitledty.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:39:42 AM
Quote from: "*******"
Klaas...You have anything together we can send Greta about Julia Renfro? It would be nice for her or her producers to know who they are dealing with.

I thought Tito did some honest reporting. Arlene Schipper was caught lying last time. She called Beth a liar and that she persoanlly saw her meeting with KJ. That never happened.

Nothing in one place but I have several nasty posted of hers captured from RU  :wink:

Maybe I can put all those screen captures into one thread here at SM and send her the link?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jobie on May 02, 2007, 12:40:04 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Jossy says he's not going on Greta anymore, and lo and behold looks who's on!

Julia always was her source. If tonight didn't prove it, nothing will convince you.


LOL - why did Jossy say he was not going on Greta anymore?  What did she do that finally pi***ed him off? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:40:46 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I find it hard to believe that the Sloots, with all their fawning over the sporter, would not have him a car.  License or not.  He had a line of credit at the casino, drank underage, and never got in trouble.  What's the big deal with driving without a license?  If you get my drift here.

I agree



Well, I once found a photo of Joran at an amusement park pretending to drive one of those little fake cars.

Remember that Klaas?  I thought I had caught him for sure!

It was fake, they don't even move but what boy that old poses in something like that like a little kid.

.

Yeah, I have it somewhere.  It was fake though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:41:11 AM
Nite Lala's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Hotshot on May 02, 2007, 12:43:00 AM
Quote
i sent several



DOZEN


i was steaming

it was the same letter several times


DOZEN that is

I sent a few myself   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on May 02, 2007, 12:43:39 AM
Here is my email to Greta today.

You know, I will never be a Politician. Having said that...


--------------------

Greta

I can't believe the tremendous  damage I feel you

are doing to the Natalee Holloway Case

by effing waxing Joran VDS' carrot!!!

...

 How much did the Van der sloots pay you

to keep plugging the fact that he

is innocent?

...

I used to be your biggest fan, but you

are making me SO SICK over your continued

misinformation in the Holloway Case!




.... you & that XXXX-ing 'DO NOTHING' DILDO GREASEBALL

you seem to LOOOOVE to give CARTE BLANCHE FREE REIGN TO

Joe Tacopina. What IS UP WITH THAT, g-i-r-l-f-r-i-e-n-d ?


>I am OVER IT, Greta.


-Carpe

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.com

"Giving Up On Natalee Is Unacceptable."


 :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 12:44:47 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
Klaas...You have anything together we can send Greta about Julia Renfro? It would be nice for her or her producers to know who they are dealing with.

I thought Tito did some honest reporting. Arlene Schipper was caught lying last time. She called Beth a liar and that she persoanlly saw her meeting with KJ. That never happened.

Nothing in one place but I have several nasty posted of hers captured from RU  :wink:

Maybe I can put all those screen captures into one thread here at SM and send her the link?


I think it is Important that the dirtbag doesnt spread her agenda in front of a huge audience at a crucial time. Yeh that will work.. :) I am sure beth can tell Greta a thing or 2 about Renho.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:45:43 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
Klaas...You have anything together we can send Greta about Julia Renfro? It would be nice for her or her producers to know who they are dealing with.

I thought Tito did some honest reporting. Arlene Schipper was caught lying last time. She called Beth a liar and that she persoanlly saw her meeting with KJ. That never happened.

Nothing in one place but I have several nasty posted of hers captured from RU  :wink:

Maybe I can put all those screen captures into one thread here at SM and send her the link?



Maybe you can find the one where she said the boys would be traumatized from touching cold, dead flesh or something very close to that!   :evil: And send a few of Wang Chang's obscene photos and the one about FAS!!   I do believe that was  glenda original as well.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 12:46:38 AM
Hello Hotshot :)

Yeh i sent a few myself..lol

I was hoping someone would pick up on Joran's Book tour..It has never been mentioned :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:49:19 AM
Hotshots

Did you hear anything about what the Dutch might have done today?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: wreck on May 02, 2007, 12:52:12 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I find it hard to believe that the Sloots, with all their fawning over the sporter, would not have him a car.  License or not.  He had a line of credit at the casino, drank underage, and never got in trouble.  What's the big deal with driving without a license?  If you get my drift here.

I agree


I too have always wondered about this.  I DO think that Charles Croes was told it was Joran's car that first night. The thing that bothers me is why haven't ANY of the locals called Joran out on this? Did they go to ALE and were ignored? Were they afraid of making waves? Were they afraid of Joran (or Joran's "friends/employers")?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Hotshot on May 02, 2007, 12:55:11 AM
*******, good for you.  She really made me hit the fan the last few times..Jorans tour?  I have no idea, but in time we will find out!  Maybe we can grab him when he does the Aruba tour :lol:

Anna, No I haven't.  I was hoping people would be on tonight saying it was the Dunes.  I can hope can't I?

I have to say, tonight when Renfro came on, I yelled RENHO, and my family just looked at me like I was crazy.  Oh wait, I am crazy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on May 02, 2007, 12:57:55 AM
DAY'S SCREEN GRABS (interview with Nat's G-Ma added)


http://tinyurl.com/24qn3z

TV VIDEO

Interview with Nat's G-Ma added - warning- low audio level

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzX73tt9A1c

-j4n


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Hotshot on May 02, 2007, 01:02:33 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
DAY'S SCREEN GRABS (interview with Nat's G-Ma added)


http://tinyurl.com/24qn3z

TV VIDEO

Interview with Nat's G-Ma added - warning- low audio level

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzX73tt9A1c

-j4n

Hey Carpe....How ya be?  So do you remember when all that happened at Zorpia?  It got me so mad.  People all around were believing that was my site, and it sooooo wasn't.  It was Satish all along.  I knew I could prove it, but just couldn't get my thinking in the right direction to find those screen shots I took.  Hehehehe, I found them.  Proof, IT WASN'T ME.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:02:57 AM
Hey Carpe!!


You still have that pic of buti smokin da crack pipe? :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 01:04:00 AM
Tell me there is not a campaign to smear Natalee and her family..HUH!! (I know you all know this, sorry )Look at this  wiki page...every single time someone tryed to even make the page somewhat acceptable, it was reverted back to trash talk, I think Beth or Dave needs to do something about this if possible. I know I would if this was my daughter. John Kelly needs to be made aware of this and see what he can do. If anybody can stop this it would be the family. Goodnight, sorry I am steaming! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natalee_Holloway&action=history


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 01:04:19 AM
Boy you guys are fast tonight...

I'm calling it a nite gang..

I'v had this thought nagging at me for a long time. It deals with the costs that Aruba expended.
 
I'm not good at words but maybe someone out here can pick up on my thought and do something with it.

I would love to have Greta & Julia get together and do a news paper / TV segment on this .  After all Julia has the inside info. and is PRO Joran

The Cost of a Simple Little LIE

What has been the cost to the Aruba government and it's people?
We hear differen versions of the  # of  millions of $ and time spent.
The extra effort that has been put forth  etc. etc.

Let's take the High Road and say YES ... in the early hours of 5/30
Joran left Natalee near the fisherman's huts and Marriot Beach..
The Kalpoes went home and stayed there ...
Joran got home some way..
And then Natalee disappeared

On 5/31/2005 the police asked the Kalpoe's about the fisherman's huts?
Why did they do that if Joran did not bring it up earlier (he was 1st to be interviewed that day)?
If Joran brought it up and the Kalpoes said they did NOT go there why did not the police ask more questions?

If Joran did not bring it up why did the police?

Mickey and Abraham were detained on 6/05/2005 without notification.

Some time after they were detained on 6/9/2005 the Mattiot Beach story became common to all three J2K (6/10 to 6/11)

Now you have 9+ days of everone looking in the wrong direction because of a simple lie.

Wittiness vs Suspect statements and accountability .. where is it?
Who else knew the Holliday Inn story was a Lie?  Freddy ?
Deepak & Satish were considerd adults ... Joran was a minor. We would call it contributing to the delinquence of a minor or something on the same line.

Everyone know of the lie could be considered part of a conspiracy (here).

So Julia please doucment the costs and tell us who should be held accountable for them.

PS..
I'm real interested in the F-16s and why they really got there. :wink:

Sorry
Just one of my late night rants.

SeeYaaaByeee

When did the Govt. workers get the day off to search?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:05:45 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Tell me there is not a campaign to smear Natalee and her family..HUH!! (I know you all know this, sorry )Look at this  wiki page...every single time someone tryed to even make the page somewhat acceptable, it was reverted back to trash talk, I think Beth or Dave needs to do something about this if possible. I know I would if this was my daughter. John Kelly needs to be made aware of this and see what he can do. If anybody can stop this it would be the family. Goodnight, sorry I am steaming! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natalee_Holloway&action=history

I noticed Refugees have a thread today talking about the Wiki site and how they will edit anything we fix.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:06:40 AM
I was looking through my old screen captures and ran accross this.  Though I'd pass it along:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/gerster0615.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on May 02, 2007, 01:11:09 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/DFDFFDDD.png)



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/sss.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on May 02, 2007, 01:11:59 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
DAY'S SCREEN GRABS (interview with Nat's G-Ma added)


http://tinyurl.com/24qn3z

TV VIDEO

Interview with Nat's G-Ma added - warning- low audio level

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzX73tt9A1c

-j4n

Hey Carpe....How ya be?  So do you remember when all that happened at Zorpia?  It got me so mad.  People all around were believing that was my site, and it sooooo wasn't.  It was Satish all along.  I knew I could prove it, but just couldn't get my thinking in the right direction to find those screen shots I took.  Hehehehe, I found them.  Proof, IT WASN'T ME.



hey hey

Yes, what was that about? Was it really Satish for positive?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: wreck on May 02, 2007, 01:16:05 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was looking through my old screen captures and ran accross this.  Though I'd pass it along:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/gerster0615.jpg)


Was this from SM? VERY VERY intriguing -- especially coming on June 15, 2005!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:16:06 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/DFDFFDDD.png)



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/sss.png)


Thanks Bro.. The Multi Purpose credible witness....lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:17:53 AM
Hey Carpe.. Did you put the crack pipe in the photo or is that real?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:18:37 AM
Good evening everyone!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jobie on May 02, 2007, 01:37:08 AM
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "Rob"
Jossy says he's not going on Greta anymore, and lo and behold looks who's on!

Julia always was her source. If tonight didn't prove it, nothing will convince you.


LOL - why did Jossy say he was not going on Greta anymore?  What did she do that finally pi***ed him off? :lol:


Well Jobie - Looks like it is just you  and me, babe.  I would like to help you out here - but I missed the show.  Always the last to know.  Been good talking to you and I hope you get an answer from someone who did watch the show.  If not...well solong (riding off into the sunset) :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:48:37 AM
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "jobie"
Quote from: "Rob"
Jossy says he's not going on Greta anymore, and lo and behold looks who's on!

Julia always was her source. If tonight didn't prove it, nothing will convince you.


LOL - why did Jossy say he was not going on Greta anymore?  What did she do that finally pi***ed him off? :lol:


Well Jobie - Looks like it is just you  and me, babe.  I would like to help you out here - but I missed the show.  Always the last to know.  Been good talking to you and I hope you get an answer from someone who did watch the show.  If not...well solong (riding off into the sunset) :roll:

Hi Jobie - Greta was pretty rude to Jossy last night, plus she's stuck on Boeti and the beach.  Jossy is just tired of her BS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:16:46 AM
Posted by Glenda/Julia at FOB:

Klaasend doesn't realize that Vivian van der Briezen from the prosecutors office told the local Press that NO REMAINS were found on the van der Sloot property.

My answer to Julia:  That doesn't mean they didn't find anything, only that they didn't find her body.

P.S. - tell your alter ego Julia she really should stay out of the sun.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: sirensong on May 02, 2007, 02:57:08 AM
If the Dutch investigators are half as intelligent and analytical as the Monkeys are, this case will be solved very soon. That's why all the ugly people are spouting off, they are scared to death of the Dutch team and what they will find.

I noticed a long time ago that when Taco started threatening to sue everyone, the MSM took ran scared.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Karo on May 02, 2007, 04:16:35 AM
I usually just lurk but I saw this article tonight on the CBS News site, and don’t think it’s been mentioned today—though I may have missed a post in which it was brought up.

The title is misleading and unfortunate  :(  “Natalee Returns”

A quick reality check for those of us who lament the tendency of news outlets to run stories about white women in trouble: The most viewed story on CBSNews.com at the moment is a "48 Hours" piece entitled "Natalee Holloway: New Clues."

Read the rest here: http://tinyurl.com/2h84fu

The article to which the writer is referring is from March 2006 and I know everyone has seen it, but I read it again and was especially interested in the following paragraphs in which Dompig is quoted.

"We have been informed by a manager of a nightclub that he received a call. He wanted to talk about the fact that he knew more about the whereabouts of Natalee," says Dompig, who acknowledges that this is the first valuable lead he's gotten in a while. "Yes, concerning a specific burial location, yes," he says.

Holloway disappeared last May, and for nearly a year, police have received dozens of leads, all leading nowhere. But Dompig is convinced that the person who made the call may be the key witness they’ve been waiting for.

"The information that this person gave was too specific to just be a story that was just made up by someone," explains Dompig.

Now, based on this new information, investigators will begin searching again for Natalee’s body on the northern tip of the island.

"Somewhere on the sand dunes that go all the way up behind the lighthouse … where we basically have to search," explains Dompig as he shows Roberts the general search area. "It’s worse than looking for a needle in a haystack."


The entire article is here:  http://tinyurl.com/28kldc

I wonder if the new searching will include this area.  All we know so far is the investigators were there (briefly?) a few days ago.  Was this area ever searched in 2006, after Dompig was interviewed for this article?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Leslie on May 02, 2007, 06:49:01 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 06:56:16 AM
I noticed a few thing last nite.

1. The International Courts set up / agreed to the 2 year statue for suspect status as described by de Sousa. So it seems to be a law after all.

2. As Robots touched on - this will be going on for a few more months due to the forensics apparently collected at the VDS home. The soil samples alone will take quite a bit of time as that stuff is looked at through a microscope grain by grain. It's gonna take some time to conclude whether or not there is anything there outside of eyeballing a fingernail they can match to Natalee's nail polish found in her luggage. (if in fact she wore nail polish).

3. The silence by the KLPD described by Dave is encouraging. The ALE is a sift. They less they know the better it is for everyone. The last thing Family or anyone else needs is someone in the ALE tipping off the suspects, especially Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 07:02:58 AM
Dead Turista on RENAISSANCE ISLAND.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: spooky112483 on May 02, 2007, 07:11:54 AM
tcumom...have you got in touch with Tylergal? She told me it was ok with her but she nor I has your email. So let Klass know that it's ok to give you mine or Tyler's email. If Klass needs help finding either of our address just say so an I'll email her (Klass), ok?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: spooky112483 on May 02, 2007, 07:13:25 AM
hey Rob! good to see ya buddy. Hope you are doing well. Glad to see you back here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 07:16:17 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
hey Rob! good to see ya buddy. Hope you are doing well. Glad to see you back here.


Good Morning Snoopy :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Hotshot on May 02, 2007, 07:24:32 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was looking through my old screen captures and ran accross this.  Though I'd pass it along:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/gerster0615.jpg)

Klaas, is this from Europe by any chance?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: justinsmama on May 02, 2007, 07:25:16 AM
I missed what's going on with Jossy not being on Greta's show anymore? Can someone direct me to a link and/or explain?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Hotshot on May 02, 2007, 07:30:05 AM
Carpe, yes that was really Satish, I had an IP tracker on the site, and reported it to tech on Zorpia, and he even confirmed it all.  Sorry about last night not responding, fell asleep at the puter.

I wrote to our good friend in aruba last night, telling him how we all applaud him for the good he is doing, and got quite a letter back.  However I will post here one line that it looks like he will really stand by for a while.
But I will no longer accept any invitation from Greta or her producers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 07:36:58 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
I missed what's going on with Jossy not being on Greta's show anymore? Can someone direct me to a link and/or explain?

This is what was posted at Easy's site:

"I will not appear on her show again, and I will not supply her or her people with any more information. That's it for me! I knew where she wanted to lead me...away from Joran...and to Boeti! But I told her that many people, including the beach bums were questioned, but didn't get the chance to tell her that NONE were ever arrested! The police saw no value in those people, either as witnesses or suspects."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 07:46:22 AM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote
Greta: Are you a 100% certain that they didn’t simply leave her at the beach. I mean in your heart and mind.

Dave: In my heart and mind no I don’t.

Greta: And in terms of you hold all three accountable and you remain 100% suspicious of those three and no one else.

Dave: Yes, I think when you get into a situation when they start lying right off the bat and continue lying and trying to deceive the police and start that process and the police have told us time and time again they tried to look for other leads and it circled back down to these three boys so are they the only three involved I don’t think so.


Didn't Greta say last night that the family agreed with her about other people needing to be interviewed, ie Boeti?

Hmm ... Notice Greta didn't have the nerve tonight to mention it.

Greta, did you see the light? Or was it all those emails today?  :wink:



Prolly just cuz pitbull Joe Taco wasnt there breathing down her neck..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 07:48:07 AM
Good morning everyone.

I left here on pg.23 of the last forum and look where you guys are :lol:
Have to take grandson for shots this am so take it easy so I can catch up later. :D
Does anyone know if the searches are over or will there be more?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: tcumom on May 02, 2007, 08:07:16 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
tcumom...have you got in touch with Tylergal? She told me it was ok with her but she nor I has your email. So let Klass know that it's ok to give you mine or Tyler's email. If Klass needs help finding either of our address just say so an I'll email her (Klass), ok?

Spooky ~ I don't have her email ~ Klaas has mine ~ maybe she could email me your email or Tyler's, and I can go from there.  
Good grief ~ I can't make anything easy  :oops: Thanks for asking.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: spooky112483 on May 02, 2007, 08:38:55 AM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Quote from: "spooky112483"
tcumom...have you got in touch with Tylergal? She told me it was ok with her but she nor I has your email. So let Klass know that it's ok to give you mine or Tyler's email. If Klass needs help finding either of our address just say so an I'll email her (Klass), ok?

Spooky ~ I don't have her email ~ Klaas has mine ~ maybe she could email me your email or Tyler's, and I can go from there.  
Good grief ~ I can't make anything easy  :oops: Thanks for asking.....


I emailed Klass to give you my email :wink: no problem.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 02, 2007, 08:42:27 AM
I noticed the mention of no remains,but no mention of evidence ,also.HMMM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: spooky112483 on May 02, 2007, 08:44:13 AM
I hope I didnt upset/offend anyone in some other threads. Just wanted to say that I love you all!!!
God Bless Natalee!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 08:56:19 AM
Good morning fine Monkeys!!!!

I bet the searching will continue today.  We shall see.

It is so good seeing monkeys whom we haven't seen in a while.

I truly feel like we are about to get some REAL answers.

I too, will be patient with the Dutch investigators.  They have alot of work ahead of them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 09:09:20 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Dead Turista on RENAISSANCE ISLAND.


Rob - Thanks for heads up. From what Diario says, he may have had a heart attack. American, male, 59. CPR, mouth-to-mouth administered. I *think* DOA at hospital. No name or home state/city was included.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 02, 2007, 09:11:32 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Tell me there is not a campaign to smear Natalee and her family..HUH!! (I know you all know this, sorry )Look at this  wiki page...every single time someone tryed to even make the page somewhat acceptable, it was reverted back to trash talk, I think Beth or Dave needs to do something about this if possible. I know I would if this was my daughter. John Kelly needs to be made aware of this and see what he can do. If anybody can stop this it would be the family. Goodnight, sorry I am steaming! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natalee_Holloway&action=history


thanks, I'm going to go see if what I added yesterday is still there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:16:29 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Rob"
Dead Turista on RENAISSANCE ISLAND.


Rob - Thanks for heads up. From what Diario says, he may have had a heart attack. American, male, 59. CPR, mouth-to-mouth administered. I *think* DOA at hospital. No name or home state/city was included.


yes, looks like a heart attack msmarple.

Thats the way I wanna go out.. a girl in a bikini givin me CPR and mouth to mouth.. not too shabby if you ask me...

plus the new bikini uniforms worn by the paramedics will be a highlighted feature for the new travel brouchures. :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:25:39 AM
Just thought of something. I had a car a few years ago and it had tinted windows. We have a law in PA against tinted windows.

I would get pulled over once in a while and I would be issued a waring to remove the tint. I never got a ticket until like the 20th time I was warned.

So I removed the tint myself. I peeled it back and then used a cleaning fluid to remove the adhesive.

I then ate a chocolate bar.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 09:27:50 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Just thought of something. I had a car a few years ago and it had tinted windows. We have a law in PA against tinted windows.

I would get pulled over once in a while and I would be issued a waring to remove the tint. I never got a ticket until like the 20th time I was warned.

So I removed the tint myself. I peeled it back and then used a cleaning fluid to remove the adhesive.

I then ate a chocolate bar.  :D



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 09:29:48 AM
a few days ago i said they would be looking for GLASS

they are






i see everything

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

im skerrrrrrrrrrrrrring myself again





i skerrrrrrrr  everyone

IM NOT SKERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 09:32:19 AM
My understanding re. tinted windows in Georgia - it isn't illegal, but there IS a limit on just how tinted (dark) they can be. I even think it is standard with most new cars here.

But there must be exceptions for certain kinds of vehicles, such as limos and buses ... because I see them all the time with windows pitch black.

The tint helps reduce interior heat, which may be why this varies from state to state.

IMO, most if not all cars on Aruba probably have tinted windows.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: terryd270 on May 02, 2007, 09:35:18 AM
Good day! I hope we hear something good and that the investigation that is going on is for real.. I needed to order some ETOGESIC for my dog online for my dog that has bad arthritis and it seems to work..  I refused to watch Greta so I rely on you guys to keep me up todate on whats happening.. I won't watch Greta nor will I go to the other sites to read their trash.  Its pretty hot here in West Palm Beach, FL and now that we can't water our lawns they are all turning brown.  I have two ponds on my property and they are filled with gators, since they still have water in them.. I go out at night and thats all you hear is them talking to each other and sometimes you see them floating along like logs.  I worry about the dogs in the neighborhood because most dogs love the water and this is not the time for them to go swimming..  Well I need to go and hopefully this is not a show and that the investigation will prove me wrong and something will come out of this.. At least it will keep the Sloots and Kalpoes and others restless at night..  
Terry


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 09:37:22 AM
I do remember we discussed Deepak's car windows quite a bit early on.

Initial word was that the windows were tinted. We have a good photo of the car when it was being set up for towing/searching. A poster observed that the windows didn't look tinted in that photo, but it may be because of the way the sunlight was hitting them. Just hard to tell for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 09:41:46 AM
Hi, fellow monkeys!

Tamikosmom, are you reading right now? A few pages back, you expressed lots of optimism about the house of cards falling.
What, in particular, has you so hopeful?

(sorry--no time to read back through)

Or--if Janet's not here, can someone else explain? Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:43:11 AM
I see Frank's been busy:
http://www.arubadirtypolice.blogspot.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 09:45:22 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
I do remember we discussed Deepak's car windows quite a bit early on.

Initial word was that the windows were tinted. We have a good photo of the car when it was being set up for towing/searching. A poster observed that the windows didn't look tinted in that photo, but it may be because of the way the sunlight was hitting them. Just hard to tell for sure.


I imagine that they WERE tinted.  As you brought up, it helps w/ heat in the car, and besides that, when cars are customized, that is one of the first things guys do to their cars is to tint the windows, it is quite inexpensive.  It is easy to remove too.

I seem to remember that the word was they were tinted.  A discription we got early.

IF something (blood/vomit) did get on the window, and someone tried to use some type of cleaning liquid to get it off(just not thinking) it would ruin the tint.  From what I understand, you can't use certain things on the tinting.  Maybe they used the wrong thing trying to clean the windows and ruined the tint, thus the need to remove the tint.  Just a thought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 10:14:31 AM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I see Frank's been busy:
http://www.arubadirtypolice.blogspot.com/



hadn't been there in a while, Indy.  Thanks.  Good stuff!  I'm inclined to believe him.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 10:16:31 AM
Hey guys! Are they searching today?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:25:23 AM
im going out on a LIMB  8)




BIG NEWS TODAY !!!!!!

my opinion only  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:26:40 AM
So, have they dug up the pool yet???


Morning moneys.  Just heard on Fox they are returning to dig at the Sloots....

Anna says "DIG UP THE POOL!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:27:34 AM
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


where is ANITA ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:30:12 AM
I see you guys are still on the tinted windows.  I was just thinking about it last night...didn't mean to start an entire discussion on it.  LOL  Nevertheless, it does involve the car and I just wondered why it was important enough for Joran to indicate they were not tinted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:33:25 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I see you guys are still on the tinted windows.  I was just thinking about it last night...didn't mean to start an entire discussion on it.  LOL  Nevertheless, it does involve the car and I just wondered why it was important enough for Joran to indicate they were not tinted.



because he wanted to make sure that everyone in the WORLD knows he LIES and has a problem  8)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:35:43 AM
K2 pretty quiet
 8)

hmmmmmmmmphhhhhhhhhh


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 10:38:25 AM
Quote from: "robots"
K2 pretty quiet
 8)

hmmmmmmmmphhhhhhhhhh


Robots - what do you think of the idea that it's Freddy who might be talking?

"Ask Freddy ... Freddy knows the truth ... " - Deepak


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:39:16 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "robots"
K2 pretty quiet
 8)

hmmmmmmmmphhhhhhhhhh


Robots - what do you think of the idea that it's Freddy who might be talking?

"Ask Freddy ... Freddy knows the truth ... " - Deepak


i like it  8)  :wink:

im not married to the K2 CROWN WITNESS idea

but SOMEONE is talking


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:39:45 AM
I am convinced that within all the lies there is often a small indication of what really happened and some clues are there.  Take for instance when Joran was walking from the racket club to the casinos.  He went by the beach...to look for his shoes.  He wanted to make sure that there was no evidence of where they placed her in the crab cage and hauled her out to sea.  I know I could be stretching it a bit, but you get the idea...thus my asking about the windows last night.  It never hurts to go back and rethink some things.  I know it won't solve the case but you never know what you might hit on that causes a light to go off in the right person's mind and they solve this thing and bring Natalee home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 02, 2007, 10:39:54 AM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Tell me there is not a campaign to smear Natalee and her family..HUH!! (I know you all know this, sorry )Look at this  wiki page...every single time someone tryed to even make the page somewhat acceptable, it was reverted back to trash talk, I think Beth or Dave needs to do something about this if possible. I know I would if this was my daughter. John Kelly needs to be made aware of this and see what he can do. If anybody can stop this it would be the family. Goodnight, sorry I am steaming! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natalee_Holloway&action=history


the entire section on Natalee's Behavior was removed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:41:03 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I am convinced that within all the lies there is often a small indication of what really happened and some clues are there.  Take for instance when Joran was walking from the racket club to the casinos.  He went by the beach...to look for his shoes.  He wanted to make sure that there was no evidence of where they placed her in the crab cage and hauled her out to sea.  I know I could be stretching it a bit, but you get the idea...thus my asking about the windows last night.  It never hurts to go back and rethink some things.  I know it won't solve the case but you never know what you might hit on that causes a light to go off in the right person's mind and they solve this thing and bring Natalee home.



yep  :wink: you got it

thats what the DUTCH are doing because ALE FAILED
they received an "F"

DUTCH will get an "A"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 10:44:15 AM
Morning Monkeys!
Trying to catch up! Did someone post they are searching vds property again today?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 02, 2007, 10:54:27 AM
Quote from: "jill"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Tell me there is not a campaign to smear Natalee and her family..HUH!! (I know you all know this, sorry )Look at this  wiki page...every single time someone tryed to even make the page somewhat acceptable, it was reverted back to trash talk, I think Beth or Dave needs to do something about this if possible. I know I would if this was my daughter. John Kelly needs to be made aware of this and see what he can do. If anybody can stop this it would be the family. Goodnight, sorry I am steaming! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Natalee_Holloway&action=history


the entire section on Natalee's Behavior was removed.


now it's back.

I can't keep up with those fools.  

Good thing that thinking people know that Wiki is full of caca.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 10:55:27 AM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Morning Monkeys!
Trying to catch up! Did someone post they are searching vds property again today?

I'm not positive but I think that came from a misleading teaser from FOX.

Orlando Salinas did do a live interview via satellite phone but he did not report any new information...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 02, 2007, 10:57:44 AM
Good morning.

Back to working and lurking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 02, 2007, 11:04:26 AM
Good morning Monkeys :)   How are you feeling today, Peaches?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 11:06:47 AM
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Morning Monkeys!
Trying to catch up! Did someone post they are searching vds property again today?

I'm not positive but I think that came from a misleading teaser from FOX.

Orlando Salinas did do a live interview via satellite phone but he did not report any new information...


Thanks! The Holiday is over though am I correct?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Mere on May 02, 2007, 11:07:50 AM
Good morning friends... :D

Much to catch up....gone past two weeks....everything looks
promising....when they are working in the back yard, I hope
they take the pool pump apart...!

Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 02, 2007, 11:08:41 AM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Good morning Monkeys :)   How are you feeling today, Peaches?


I'm great!  TY

Anything going on today??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 02, 2007, 11:12:21 AM
Quote from: "robots"
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


where is ANITA ??


Hmm.  I just had a thought.  What if listening devices have or had been recently  placed int he Sloots residence?  Wonder what the laws are on that in Arubaland?  Gives new meaning to the saying "..oh, to be a fly on the wall.."  Are the Sloots still staying in their house?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:13:06 AM
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 02, 2007, 11:13:45 AM
Morning everyone!   :D

I found an old site and found it interesting so bringing it over for all to read over. Several interesting comments at the end as well.

God bless~


Eyes for Lies
The Human Lie Detector Blog

Friday, February 24, 2006
Joran van der Sloot: Honest or not?

I watched the interview with Chris Cuomo and Joran van der Sloot last night. I taped it and went back this morning to write down the conversations in the areas that concerned me. I will share them with you.

The first thing I noticed was that Joran was very neutral. He was your classic neutral person in this interview. He didn't show emotions, he didn't get excited, he didn't get angry -- he just spoke monotone without emotions. Joran was a blank slate 99.9% of the time. However, when you look at other videos of Joran, he is not a blank slate. He expresses emotion. His face is expressive.

This raises a red flag for me immediately. Joran should be full of emotions. Anyone would be full of emotions being wrongly accused. However, if you are accused of something you did -- you would have every reason to hide those emotions. Wouldn't you?

In looking at the Joran case, I will tell you that Joran is a difficult read. When someone doesn't offer up emotions like Joran, and conceals them quite well, we are only left with one thing: the facts. Is what Joran saying logical? Does it fit? Is he answering questions like an honest man?

Joran did offer a few odd smirkish smiles at strange times. They weren't in "contradiction" to what he was saying, but they were odd and what I'd consider inappropriate in their timing. These raise more red flags but by themselves they are not enough to say anything. I personally don't think a normal person who is innocent in his situation would smirk or smile when he did but this is not enough to form an opinion. It is just a clue to a bigger picture.

With all real life stories, when you add up the pieces of the puzzle -- you get a picture. You will get a picture of the truth, or you will see a lie. I don't think I've ever called out that I didn't believe anyone without a mountain of clues. One thing may be odd or out of character -- but when multiple things rear their head and create a pile of questions -- you can't deny the painting that stands before you.

Below I will review segments of the interview with you:
CC = Chris Cuomo
J= Joran

CC: Did you remember who initiated the kissing?

J: Ah...yeah. I did.

CC: Did you ever say that she was the one who started kissing you?

J: I don't know. Maybe. I said a lot of things.

Now Joran can't remember the lies he told? He knows the truth. He just doesn't want to tell you. Often times thought not always when people say "maybe" they mean "yes".


J: We were planning on going to my house...because she said she wanted to go to my house.

CC: What were your intentions in taking her to your house?

J: Um...my intentions to take her to the house were...yeah..um...to have sex with her."

Did she want to go to Joran's house -- or did he want sex? Which is it?? I suspect it was the latter.


Chris Cuomo goes on to say that Joran has second thoughts. He decides not to take Natalee to his house because he says his father and brothers are sleeping. Then he says Natalee has an idea to go to the light house on the northeast coast to see sharks.

I find this very odd:

a) Most people don't look for sharks in the dark. This isn't logical. I don't think Natalee said this.

b) Joran first wants to go to his house sometime after midnight -- and then he decides not too because he realized his family is sleeping. I don't believe this. It isn't logical. It wasn't like he was going to bring Natalee home at 10:00 p.m. and then next thing it was 2:00 a.m. It was midnight or later the first time he thinks about bringing her home. He knew his family was sleeping then! I'm not buying this.


Also, later in the evening, Joran says he made up all the lies the first time around because he had a girlfriend and didn't want his family and friends to think bad of him -- but HERE he was willing to bring Natalee HOME to his house. He obviously wasn't worried about what his dad or family thought then -- was he? This points to deception. Another piece of the picture.


CC: It's 1 a.m., and you say Natalee wanted to see sharks. Are there a lot of sharks around Aruba?

J: No. Not at all. But she wanted to see the sharks. Yeah...and I don't know. I told her there are no sharks on Aruba.

When Joran says "Yeah, I don't know" he smiles very oddly -- as if he does in fact know something. It's perplexing.

Another odd piece of this picture. Which picture is it painting for you? An honest one or a deceptive one?


Chris Cuomo says Joran says he left (Natalee on the beach) without his shoes.

CC: Should the fact that you left your shoes be seen as a sign of panic? That you were nervous and scared about what had happened there?

J: No. Because that is not what happened.

Joran has glint of a smile again when he replies to Chris Cuomo. Why is he smiling? Another question mark. Another piece of the picture.


J: I'd left them on the beach, I'd walked to the car, we got in the car, and right then, there, I couldn't go back because... we were going home.

The timing of his pause in the sentence above is odd "because...(Was he thinking of a reason?)...we were going home."

Furthermore, is his answer logical? Absolutely not. Add to that -- his shoes were never found.

We are painting a picture here. Actually Joran is...What do you see?


CC: When you heard that a girl had gone missing on the beach what did you think?

J: Ummm.....well, the first thing that popped into my head was...(explanative/bleep)...what if something happened to her? What if she went swimming...I was thinking after everything she told me, she probably might have gone back to her hotel, hooked up with...gone to someone else...hooked up with someone else and wanted to stay another day on the island.

First of all his answer is not free flowing. It is broken up, hesitant, chopped, and not logically said at times. Second, the fact that he insinuates that she "probably, might have hooked up with someone else" is disturbing. He is trying to push everything away from himself.


Chris Cuomo say something to the effect of why didn't you go to the police and tell them everything you know. That would be a normal reaction.

J: That's what should have been the reaction...but...ah...I guess...ah.. we decided that I didn't want anyone to know that happened.

This is interesting because there are three boys here -- but clearly this is about him. He says "we decided that I didn't want..." He decided. That's the truth. Furthermore, he stutters for words a lot. When people tell the truth -- they don't stutter like this... Just another piece of the picture.


CC: What is your first impression of Natalee's mother?

J: ... She screamed at me, tell me where my daughter is.

CC: And did you?

J: I told her I don't know.

Chris Cuomo goes on to say to the audience, " But he told them more that that. " Joran told everyone that he and his friends dropped off Natalee at the Holiday Inn.

CC: People don't lie when they have nothing to hide. Why did you lie if you had nothing to hide about Natalee ?

J: I lied because...yeah...I was scared. I had a girlfriend at the time. I didn't want my dad to think bad about me, I didn't want my friends to think bad about me."

Earlier, Joran was willing to bring another girl who was not his girlfriend home -- to have sex with him -- and he wasn't worried about what his parents might think THEN. But NOW he cares?? This doesn't add up.

Second, he had a girlfriend yet he is out with Natalee and wants to have sex with her. This show that Joran doesn't not have good moral values. He is deceptive and willing to use people for his own benefit regardless of HOW others feel. He admits to that much.


CC: Why not just tell them the truth?

J: I didn't want anyone to know. I didn't want anyone to know I left her on the beach.

If you honestly didn't do anything -- why would you lie? It just doesn't add up. Most normal people would get out there and start looking, would confess everything they know in hopes of finding Natalee. They would think about Natalee instead of themselves.


CC: You tell the police that Natalee fell out of the car when she got out to go (at the Holiday Inn). Why did you tell them that? (Referring to Joran's lies).

J: For no specific reason.

At this point, Joran gives a smirk that is puzzling. I believe there is a reason. I believe at one point Natalee did fall out of the car.

CC: Was there a little bit of the truth in it? Was Natalee more drunk than you are letting on?

J: No, not at all.

When Joran says "No. Not at all." There is another odd grin.


Chris Cuomo says Joran now says he might have told the police the real story, the one he's telling you tonight then and there if the family hadn't been so aggressive when they met that first night.

J: The way they were putting pressure on us probably...uh..made us lie more...because it seemed like we were in big trouble."

CC: Even though they were being hostile -- they were searching for a girl that hasn't been found.

J: They were searching for a girl who wasn't found...but...a...and I lied to them about it but....a....ah...how they acted towards my family and ...ah...my friends is not a normal way parents would go about....if their daughter was missing.

It's not normal?? Here Joran is playing the victim. He wants people to feel sorry for him. He doesn't not have the ability to have any compassion for Natalee or her family. This again is odd. Most people who were innocent would have GREAT compassion for the family, and would defend their innocence.

Also, Joran stutters a lot...and talks odd. This raises my eyebrows repeatedly.


CC: Nobody had a sense of right and wrong at the time among you three.

J: No.

Chris Cuomo goes on to say that over eleven days, the three boys all met at Joran's house to discuss the situation.

J: Deepak and Satish came to my house about every day and we talked and we talked. We...a...tried to... and we discussed things. And we were like a...we also at that time said well maybe its time to go to the police and tell them exactly what happened.

Why is Joran's speech so chopped up? He isn't nervous. Is he thinking of what to say and has to "change his story" to hide the truth? Why is he talking nonsense?


Chris Cuomo says that neither of the two brothers admit to driving Joran home that night.
CC: Why would they lie?

J: I don't know. Well....the thing that...the only explanation I can...a..get for that is at the point if they said they would have picked me up...all...the...everything goes towards them...because...then that meant that they dropped me off at my house and ah...I went to sleep...and they had a car and they could have done anything they wanted.

Joran -- This answer makes absolutely no sense. None. The brothers had the car all night long regardless. That doesn't mean they committed murder now, does it? Or were involved -- but that is what Joran is suggesting. This sentence really raises my eyebrows. He is having hard time saying clear, sensible answers time and time again. This is nonsense. People who are honest don't talk nonsense.


CC: Do you think there is a chance one of your friend went to that beach where she was to hurt Natalee?

J: I cannot answer that question. The thing that keeps me ...that does make me think they know something more about it is they won't tell the truth about Satish picking me up.

Now...listen to the next sentence.

CC: The one thing you three agree upon is that you were the last person to be with Natalee.

J: Um..Yes.

Does that make any sense at all? It doesn't.

Time and time again.


CC: Do you think you did anything wrong that night?

J: Yes.

CC: What was your responsibility as you see it?

Joran says he shouldn't have left her at the beach.

J: I should have brought her back to her hotel, or I should have ...um...made sure I left her with someone, one of her friends, but I should have gotten her back to where she should have been.

Here Joran is honest. Look at how his speech flowed naturally, normally and without chop, hesitation and nonsense. Very interesting.


CC: Have you ever given a girl a drug?

J: (smirking) No. Never.

I don't believe this. Why is he smirking???


This was the most shocking part of the interview!!!

CC: What would you say to Natalee if you were still able to speak to her?

J: If I were to see her, if she'd be found tomorrow, I'd hate her. Yes, I'd hate her if she really ran away from home, I'd hate her.

First, he doesn't have anything he'd say to Natalee. His brain didn't even think in those terms. Why?? Instead, he thought about how he'd feel. He'd feel HATE.

This shows a callousness about Joran that is scary. This whole situation is about him and he has no sympathy for Natalee or her family. People who are honest would most likely respond something like this: "I'd be thrilled. " "I'd hug her." "I'd hug the ground I walk on. It would prove my innocence." "Thank god." "I'd ask her what happened?" "I'd say how could you do this to me? You had to see on the news I was being framed for something I didn't do!!!" "I'd be relieved" "The truth would be revealed."

Honest people would say anything but HATE HER. Joran, however, DOES hate her. I have no doubt about it. He hates her because SHE has RUINED HIS LIFE. Perhaps due to his actions?
19 pieces to this puzzle. What picture does it paint for you?

Joran is still a big suspect in my eyes. I believe he knows way more than he is telling us. I think he knows where Natalee ultimately ended up.

http://www.eyesforlies.blogspot.com/2006/02/joran-van-der-sloot-honest-or-not.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 02, 2007, 11:14:55 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Good morning Monkeys :)   How are you feeling today, Peaches?


I'm great!  TY

Anything going on today??


I don't know if anything is going on with the search and investigation today.  I don't expect any big announcement any time soon, due to the evidence still being collected and needing to be tested.  The more the Dutch search, the more I am encouraged.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: MuffyBee on May 02, 2007, 11:16:14 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


That's cool.  I can DIG IT!  Leave no stone unturned.  Justice for Natalee.  Please.  Justice for Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 11:17:02 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


Oh Lala's!  Will you have to write your name in your book? :lol:  

J/K - Hon...thanks for the heads up.  I expect them to return to the sloot's - no way they can get it all done in 2 days, IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 02, 2007, 11:18:56 AM
This person from "Eyes for Lies" would be a good candidate for one of Dana Pretzers shows. IMO   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 02, 2007, 11:25:16 AM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "robots"
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


where is ANITA ??


Hmm.  I just had a thought.  What if listening devices have or had been recently  placed int he Sloots residence?  Wonder what the laws are on that in Arubaland?  Gives new meaning to the saying "..oh, to be a fly on the wall.."  Are the Sloots still staying in their house?


Don't know about the devices, but I would love to have them nail the "leak"....the person that told PVDS they found nothing.  Perhaps it's the same crowd that lead the first misinformation campaign...reporters that emphasize that someone spoke to "the local" reporters.  The ones that talk like that have done the most damage to the island and I would love this team to name names (like Julia Renfro) and demand funds for having to clean up their original misinfo mess.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 11:25:44 AM
Forgive me if someone else has posted this prior but I was just watching the replays of Greta on the FP last night, and read thru the comments and found this one made a short while ago?

It's #19 by Melissa?

I cannot listen to Julia Renfro’s irritating voice. I am tired of hearing her say how much money Aruba has spent on the Natalee Holloway “vanishment”. I lived in Aruba and I know more about Julia than I care to. For instance, her children are fathered by different men - the last being her married black boy friend. She should just keep her mouth shut and perhaps take a look in the mirror.

Comment by Melissa | May 2, 2007, 11:06 am


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 02, 2007, 11:29:15 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Forgive me if someone else has posted this prior but I was just watching the replays of Greta on the FP last night, and read thru the comments and found this one made a short while ago?

It's #19 by Melissa?

I cannot listen to Julia Renfro’s irritating voice. I am tired of hearing her say how much money Aruba has spent on the Natalee Holloway “vanishment”. I lived in Aruba and I know more about Julia than I care to. For instance, her children are fathered by different men - the last being her married black boy friend. She should just keep her mouth shut and perhaps take a look in the mirror.
Comment by Melissa | May 2, 2007, 11:06 am


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



She should keep her fat mouth shut and her legs together. RenHO :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 02, 2007, 11:30:21 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Forgive me if someone else has posted this prior but I was just watching the replays of Greta on the FP last night, and read thru the comments and found this one made a short while ago?

It's #19 by Melissa?

I cannot listen to Julia Renfro’s irritating voice. I am tired of hearing her say how much money Aruba has spent on the Natalee Holloway “vanishment”. I lived in Aruba and I know more about Julia than I care to. For instance, her children are fathered by different men - the last being her married black boy friend. She should just keep her mouth shut and perhaps take a look in the mirror.

Comment by Melissa | May 2, 2007, 11:06 am


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


And wouldn't that increase her chances of being somehow directly related to an interested party in this mess....go Melissa, tell more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:31:25 AM
Kimmy
I have always suspected there is a bit of mischief underneath that sweet face of yours.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: dkpen on May 02, 2007, 11:31:51 AM
Heading out for awhile. Need to jump in the shower. Taking my new adopted doxie rescue pup to the vet for a check up.

God bless~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 02, 2007, 11:32:31 AM
"Vanishment" is not a word.

Julia is not a journalist.  She's a lying hag.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:33:14 AM
Waaahhhhh! My server has been down and I'm not even going to try to catch up! I saw Greta, and I'll pick up eventually what you smart monkeys have been discussing!  :lol:

Hi Guys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:34:29 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Waaahhhhh! My server has been down and I'm not even going to try to catch up! I saw Greta, and I'll pick up eventually what you smart monkeys have been discussing!  :lol:

Hi Guys!


same old stuff

GRETA is a WIND BAG

GLENDA is a WIND BAG


are they the same person ??? 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:35:47 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


I heard it too Lala's. That's exactly what was said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 11:37:21 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
"Vanishment" is not a word.

Julia is not a journalist.  She's a lying hag.


I agree and I'm not interested in her dangerous liasons except as they may point to her obvious lack of integrity unless of course her husband approves of raising other men's children? Maybe he knows and agrees with this?

so this is also the "baby" which she screeched/claims Jug nearly injured? I still will never believe her regarding that accusation  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 11:37:52 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


I heard it too Lala's. That's exactly what was said.


HALLELUJAH !!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:38:56 AM
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 11:40:01 AM
Do we know if Julia Renfro is actually married?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:40:57 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


I heard it too Lala's. That's exactly what was said.


I think they are getting their info from the witch also.  I never thought I would be so ticked at FOX News.  I am getting pretty tired of writing emails to them.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:41:18 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


I think my comparison slide show I did of Greta and Renfro made Greta look so good she appears physically improved.  Like comparing apples to prunes  :wink:

Good Morning all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:41:21 AM
i think the DUTCH have STATEMENTS that Natalee was at the SLOOT
HOUSE OF HORRORS

but they are only statments from people that have lied in the past
K2, FREDDIE etc etc etc

so, now they are about to SHOVE it down PAULUS throat and JORAN throat when the BOTH of the them have said several times that she was not there...

because of the EVIDENCE they will find

THIS WILL BLOW THE ROOF OFF THE CASE


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

going to take a nap

GET THE TRIAL GOING  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 11:41:53 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Kimmy
I have always suspected there is a bit of mischief underneath that sweet face of yours.  :roll:


Oooops!  I Knew I shouldn't draw attention to myself! :smt018


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 11:43:02 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


She was on that satellite feed that at best, gives an illusion and is very poor visual quality, which in this case benefitted JR.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:43:49 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.


I heard it too Lala's. That's exactly what was said.


I think they are getting their info from the witch also.  I never thought I would be so ticked at FOX News.  I am getting pretty tired of writing emails to them.   :roll:


Remember, I wasn't here last night because my server was down, so forgive me if I'm plowing old ground, but Lala's, I think they heard all the e-mails! Just the impression I got from Greta's show. She had Vinda go over the 2 year thing, and even mentioned getting lots of e-mails!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:44:12 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Do we know if Julia Renfro is actually married?


Well, I know she has kids, 3 I think.  She told me that once.  She said she had dropped by the police station or prosecutor's office to check out the dossier.  Does anyone else remember that?  She was alias Bondia at the time.  I wish I had that post too.  It was a classic...she had three kids and hubby in tow and made them wait in the car.  She said she was headed to her in-laws.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 11:44:31 AM
Hey monks!

I'm chiming in on the Julia comments. Hope I don't offend anyone, but has she always talked like she did last night?

It seemed like her mouth was paralized, like she had dental surgery....or maybe Botox. I'm not sure if Botox would do that. Anyone know? Ahem...I also think she looks better...although I hate to say it. She's still ugly on the inside, though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:44:39 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


She was on that satellite feed that at best, gives an illusion and is very poor visual quality, which in this case benefitted JR.  :wink:

Actually I do believe Renfro has dropped some weight recently.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:45:28 AM
GRETA was BAGGED and TAGGED

she got emails from people ...errrr uhhhh i mean MONKEYS

telling her she was on the same level as JOE T

i blasted her 6 ways to SUNDAY

hehehehehehehehehehehe

come GRETA, get with the program

either get onboard......or get out  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:46:34 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


I think my comparison slide show I did of Greta and Renfro made Greta look so good she appears physically improved.  Like comparing apples to prunes  :wink:

Good Morning all!


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Or prines to kumquats! ( :oops: I didn't say that)

I have belly laughed a dozen times over FOM's antics yesterday. Klaas? Have you told 'em about her post?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:47:48 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


I think my comparison slide show I did of Greta and Renfro made Greta look so good she appears physically improved.  Like comparing apples to prunes  :wink:

Good Morning all!


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Or prines to kumquats! ( :oops: I didn't say that)

I have belly laughed a dozen times over FOM's antics yesterday. Klaas? Have you told 'em about her post?

No CBB - go ahead, I don't remember the entire post...just remember it was funny.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 11:48:47 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Hey monks!

I'm chiming in on the Julia comments. Hope I don't offend anyone, but has she always talked like she did last night?

It seemed like her mouth was paralized, like she had dental surgery....or maybe Botox. I'm not sure if Botox would do that. Anyone know? Ahem...I also think she looks better...although I hate to say it. She's still ugly on the inside, though.


hey Memphis!

I think Klaas is giving JR the benefit of the doubt and hey, it's ok  :lol:

I thought she and Greta both seemed "stilted" in their exchange and remarks, much more 'formal' than in the past? Maybe Greta didn't like having to resort back to JR when Jossy refused? I have to wonder....

lessons learned  :D  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 11:48:58 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Do we know if Julia Renfro is actually married?


Well, I know she has kids, 3 I think.  She told me that once.  She said she had dropped by the police station or prosecutor's office to check out the dossier.  Does anyone else remember that?  She was alias Bondia at the time.  I wish I had that post too.  It was a classic...she had three kids and hubby in tow and made them wait in the car.  She said she was headed to her in-laws.


Was just thinking that 3 kids doesn't necessarily mean there is a husband, which Nonesuche brought up....I was never a Bondia/Glenda fan, so I have no info from either, which is fine with me.  I do have a slight recollection, however, of some dialogue about the dossier.  Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 11:49:40 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has she had a facelift or lost weight or something? She looked different last night.
NOT that it helps who she is, but I thought she looked physically improved a bit.


I think my comparison slide show I did of Greta and Renfro made Greta look so good she appears physically improved.  Like comparing apples to prunes  :wink:

Good Morning all!


I missed the slide show Klaas...where is it? I wanna see, I wanna see!!
And thanks for making me so sparkly CBB..I LOVE IT!! :smt023


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:50:15 AM
Everybody was totally immersed in transcripts, Greta, theory and posts were just flying with meaty stuff. I was doing well just to follow along.

FOM chimed in with one line:

" u r making me horny. ................ooops. wrong site."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 11:50:25 AM
Hey, guys,

Can someone provide a direct link to Phil McGraw's "Notice to Motion" in
the Kalpoe lawsuit. I'm sure it is staring me  in the face somewhere, but I can't find it! LOL    

****need coffee****


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 11:50:59 AM
AAAHHH!! I just found all the emoticons :smt038  I love it!! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:51:54 AM
Greta Renfro slide show - WARNING can be damaging to your eyes  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/videos/th_GretaRenfro.jpg) (http://s118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/videos/?action=view&current=GretaRenfro.flv)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 11:52:27 AM
Lala's,  I sent you an email yesterday....yahoo address....happened upon a Shango tidbit while doing some research....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:53:07 AM
Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
Hey, guys,

Can someone provide a direct link to Phil McGraw's "Notice to Motion" in
the Kalpoe lawsuit. I'm sure it is staring me  in the face somewhere, but I can't find it! LOL    

****need coffee****


Here it is.  It's in the Important Case Document forum up at the top:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/images/MemoKalpoe.pdf


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:53:09 AM
OMG !!!!!!!!!!


fallen on ground

HELP


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 11:53:25 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
Hey monks!

I'm chiming in on the Julia comments. Hope I don't offend anyone, but has she always talked like she did last night?

It seemed like her mouth was paralized, like she had dental surgery....or maybe Botox. I'm not sure if Botox would do that. Anyone know? Ahem...I also think she looks better...although I hate to say it. She's still ugly on the inside, though.


hey Memphis!

I think Klaas is giving JR the benefit of the doubt and hey, it's ok  :lol:

I thought she and Greta both seemed "stilted" in their exchange and remarks, much more 'formal' than in the past? Maybe Greta didn't like having to resort back to JR when Jossy refused? I have to wonder....

lessons learned  :D  :lol:


I noticed that too!! JR didn't even answer greta when she said thanks and goodbye..definate tension!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 11:56:00 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I see Frank's been busy:
http://www.arubadirtypolice.blogspot.com/



hadn't been there in a while, Indy.  Thanks.  Good stuff!  I'm inclined to believe him.   :lol:


Hi LilPuma
I’ve always enjoyed reading Frank’s handywork, it’s one of the sites I check at least once everyday.  It’s been over two months since he’s posted anything new.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 11:56:01 AM
Quote from: "robots"
OMG !!!!!!!!!!


fallen on ground

HELP


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Ohhhhhhhh, Robots, you should've been there and seen it in context..........I rolled!

It's worth looking up and following for several pages. About once a page she'd pop back in with something, like " I meant to say hungry"

Everybody totally ignored it and I couldn't breathe!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 11:56:25 AM
Quote from: "robots"
GRETA was BAGGED and TAGGED

she got emails from people ...errrr uhhhh i mean MONKEYS

telling her she was on the same level as JOE T

i blasted her 6 ways to SUNDAY

hehehehehehehehehehehe

come GRETA, get with the program

either get onboard......or get out  8)


Yeah! Plus, she lost Jossy. I'm sure her producer wasn't happy about that.  Seems maybe Julia wasn't really prepared. Seriously, does anyone think she came from the dentist or the plastic surgeon?  :?

mornin Klauss !

Peaches, so glad you are doing so well. I saw your anwer to my posts a few days back.  :D

mornin and afternoon to all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 11:56:26 AM
too funny Klaas...actually..have you ever watched that e-mail joke where you are studying a car traveling on the road..searching..I don't remember what for..but you are watching closely and then up pops a scarey face that makes ya poop your pants? Reminded me of that!! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 11:57:30 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.

Hmmm, maybe the found something in the earlier dig that warranted a closer look.
This must be terribly disruptive to the VDSs, maybe they can just stay over at Renhos while this is going on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 11:58:01 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Everybody was totally immersed in transcripts, Greta, theory and posts were just flying with meaty stuff. I was doing well just to follow along.

FOM chimed in with one line:

" u r making me horny. ................ooops. wrong site."


I was here, and I had to clean off my moniter after that! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 12:00:25 PM
Me too Kimmy, I looked away to answer a biz phone call, looked back up to see Greta morphing and spewed  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 12:00:27 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Everybody was totally immersed in transcripts, Greta, theory and posts were just flying with meaty stuff. I was doing well just to follow along.

FOM chimed in with one line:

" u r making me horny. ................ooops. wrong site."


I was here, and I had to clean off my moniter after that! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


If a book of SM funnies is ever compiled, I vote that exchange as entry #1!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 12:01:37 PM
well back to work now for me but glad I could happy up the lively with Melissa's post  :lol:

I do hope tyler reads that and comes to post her thoughts, it's so tempting tyler, you gotta  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 12:02:56 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Do we know if Julia Renfro is actually married?


Well, I know she has kids, 3 I think.  She told me that once.  She said she had dropped by the police station or prosecutor's office to check out the dossier.  Does anyone else remember that?  She was alias Bondia at the time.  I wish I had that post too.  It was a classic...she had three kids and hubby in tow and made them wait in the car.  She said she was headed to her in-laws.


Was just thinking that 3 kids doesn't necessarily mean there is a husband, which Nonesuche brought up....I was never a Bondia/Glenda fan, so I have no info from either, which is fine with me.  I do have a slight recollection, however, of some dialogue about the dossier.  Thanks.

FWIW, there's a poster on the FP, melissa who lives in Aruba who mentioned on one of the recent threads that she's a lot about Renho and offered that she is not married at this time and all her children are from different fathers.  I'm paraphrasing what melissa posted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 12:03:17 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Everybody was totally immersed in transcripts, Greta, theory and posts were just flying with meaty stuff. I was doing well just to follow along.

FOM chimed in with one line:

" u r making me horny. ................ooops. wrong site."


I was here, and I had to clean off my moniter after that! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


If a book of SM funnies is ever compiled, I vote that exchange as entry #1!


I saw it, too.  She makes going to the library a new experience. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 12:04:53 PM
IndyDan,

Nonesuche brought that Melissa FP post over a page or two ago...that's why I asked.  Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 12:06:15 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
IndyDan,

Nonesuche brought that Melissa FP post over a page or two ago...that's why I asked.  Thanks.

Ah, ok, sorry, it's getting very difficult to keep up these days.  Ya go to the bathroom and you're behind 10 pages.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 12:07:31 PM
BBL but I gotta run. Klaas, if you have any suggestions to my problem in the avatar lounge, I'm listening!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 12:07:36 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "robots"
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


where is ANITA ??


Hmm.  I just had a thought.  What if listening devices have or had been recently  placed int he Sloots residence?  Wonder what the laws are on that in Arubaland?  Gives new meaning to the saying "..oh, to be a fly on the wall.."  Are the Sloots still staying in their house?


Don't know about the devices, but I would love to have them nail the "leak"....the person that told PVDS they found nothing.  Perhaps it's the same crowd that lead the first misinformation campaign...reporters that emphasize that someone spoke to "the local" reporters.  The ones that talk like that have done the most damage to the island and I would love this team to name names (like Julia Renfro) and demand funds for having to clean up their original misinfo mess.


I seriously doubt the Prosecutor is going to give out ANY significant info to anybody, especially the media, including the locals.  She probably felt she had to say 'something',  so she gave them nothing THEY need to know. I'm sure they are keeping ALL info. far away from the ALE.  Hopefully they are "investigating' them for the corruption as they go!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 12:08:35 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
IndyDan,

Nonesuche brought that Melissa FP post over a page or two ago...that's why I asked.  Thanks.

Ah, ok, sorry, it's getting very difficult to keep up these days.  Ya go to the bathroom and you're behind 10 pages.


Some things are just worth it, Indy!  :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on May 02, 2007, 12:09:38 PM
Dihanna, check out the lounge..............I gotta run! Bye!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 12:09:46 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.

Hmmm, maybe the found something in the earlier dig that warranted a closer look.
This must be terribly disruptive to the VDSs, maybe they can just stay over at Renhos while this is going on.


Oh, I feel so bad for them.... (where's the sarcasm smiley)
I'm SURE Renfro would love to have them as guests....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on May 02, 2007, 12:09:51 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
IndyDan,

Nonesuche brought that Melissa FP post over a page or two ago...that's why I asked.  Thanks.

Ah, ok, sorry, it's getting very difficult to keep up these days.  Ya go to the bathroom and you're behind 10 pages.


I hear ya...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 12:10:27 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
IndyDan,

Nonesuche brought that Melissa FP post over a page or two ago...that's why I asked.  Thanks.

Ah, ok, sorry, it's getting very difficult to keep up these days.  Ya go to the bathroom and you're behind 10 pages.


Some things are just worth it, Indy!  :shock:  :lol:

Can't argue with that!!   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 12:11:40 PM
Merci beaucoup, Klaas! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 12:13:00 PM
Quote from: Dihannah1
Quote from: Buckeye
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "robots"
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Don't know about the devices, but I would love to have them nail the "leak"....the person that told PVDS they found nothing.  Perhaps it's the same crowd that lead the first misinformation campaign...reporters that emphasize that someone spoke to "the local" reporters.  The ones that talk like that have done the most damage to the island and I would love this team to name names (like Julia Renfro) and demand funds for having to clean up their original misinfo mess.


I seriously doubt the Prosecutor is going to give out ANY significant info to anybody, especially the media, including the locals.  She probably felt she had to say 'something',  so she gave them nothing THEY need to know. I'm sure they are keeping ALL info. far away from the ALE.  Hopefully they are "investigating' them for the corruption as they go!


Hi D1,
My guess is they'll make known what evidence they have AFTER any arrests are made.  I agree, they aren't going to dilvulge anything before they have their case together.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ldstlou on May 02, 2007, 12:14:01 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.

Hmmm, maybe the found something in the earlier dig that warranted a closer look.
This must be terribly disruptive to the VDSs, maybe they can just stay over at Renhos while this is going on.


Oh, I feel so bad for them.... (where's the sarcasm smiley)
I'm SURE Renfro would love to have them as guests....


Hey Di!! How are ya Sweetie?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 12:14:22 PM
Time to get back to work, check back later.  See yall about 10 pages from now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 12:14:30 PM
OK, I'll drop the Julia discussion, but I just think it would be ironic if she had gotten Botox or gone under the knife, when she/they cruucified Beth for possibly same.


Also, want to just say that I am so relieved to see that Bailey/Alyce, Loco Stephy, and many others were spoken to by the authorities. I am so glad that someone was listening.  

The pilot/photographer is also very interesting. There is obviously many details we were not privy too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:15:01 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Lala's,  I sent you an email yesterday....yahoo address....happened upon a Shango tidbit while doing some research....


Yes, I meant to say thanks, but somehow got sidetracked.  I like the theory.  I guess I could elaborate here...I might sometime tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 12:16:46 PM
Klaas, CBB please see my post in Lounge


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:16:48 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "robots"
OMG !!!!!!!!!!


fallen on ground

HELP


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Ohhhhhhhh, Robots, you should've been there and seen it in context..........I rolled!

It's worth looking up and following for several pages. About once a page she'd pop back in with something, like " I meant to say hungry"

Everybody totally ignored it and I couldn't breathe!


Oh, I saw it I was at work and couldn't do anything but howl with laughter.  It was a beauty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 12:17:44 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Do we know if Julia Renfro is actually married?


Well, I know she has kids, 3 I think.  She told me that once.  She said she had dropped by the police station or prosecutor's office to check out the dossier.  Does anyone else remember that?  She was alias Bondia at the time.  I wish I had that post too.  It was a classic...she had three kids and hubby in tow and made them wait in the car.  She said she was headed to her in-laws.


Was just thinking that 3 kids doesn't necessarily mean there is a husband, which Nonesuche brought up....I was never a Bondia/Glenda fan, so I have no info from either, which is fine with me.  I do have a slight recollection, however, of some dialogue about the dossier.  Thanks.

FWIW, there's a poster on the FP, melissa who lives in Aruba who mentioned on one of the recent threads that she's a lot about Renho and offered that she is not married at this time and all her children are from different fathers.  I'm paraphrasing what melissa posted.


Sounds like Renfroe is easy.  If there are any demented Americans (you know who you are) going to Aruba, remember that it's up to Renfroe to prove she isn't.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:18:35 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
IndyDan,

Nonesuche brought that Melissa FP post over a page or two ago...that's why I asked.  Thanks.

Ah, ok, sorry, it's getting very difficult to keep up these days.  Ya go to the bathroom and you're behind 10 pages.


:lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 12:18:46 PM
Quote from: IndyDan
Quote from: Dihannah1
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "robots"
:shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Don't know about the devices, but I would love to have them nail the "leak"....the person that told PVDS they found nothing.  Perhaps it's the same crowd that lead the first misinformation campaign...reporters that emphasize that someone spoke to "the local" reporters.  The ones that talk like that have done the most damage to the island and I would love this team to name names (like Julia Renfro) and demand funds for having to clean up their original misinfo mess.


I seriously doubt the Prosecutor is going to give out ANY significant info to anybody, especially the media, including the locals.  She probably felt she had to say 'something',  so she gave them nothing THEY need to know. I'm sure they are keeping ALL info. far away from the ALE.  Hopefully they are "investigating' them for the corruption as they go!


Hi D1,
My guess is they'll make known what evidence they have AFTER any arrests are made.  I agree, they aren't going to dilvulge anything before they have their case together.


Exactly,  and I can't wait to see it if/when that comes out!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 12:18:54 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
OK, I'll drop the Julia discussion, but I just think it would be ironic if she had gotten Botox or gone under the knife, when she/they cruucified Beth for possibly same.


Also, want to just say that I am so relieved to see that Bailey/Alyce, Loco Stephy, and many others were spoken to by the authorities. I am so glad that someone was listening.  

The pilot/photographer is also very interesting. There is obviously many details we were not privy too.


What is your take on this memphis?  Do you think they could have photographed activities, or a "change of scenery" at the Sloots?  I find that tidbit VERY interesting as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 12:20:06 PM
Quote from: "ldstlou"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.

Hmmm, maybe the found something in the earlier dig that warranted a closer look.
This must be terribly disruptive to the VDSs, maybe they can just stay over at Renhos while this is going on.


Oh, I feel so bad for them.... (where's the sarcasm smiley)
I'm SURE Renfro would love to have them as guests....


Hey Di!! How are ya Sweetie?


I'm great, how 'bout you!  Seems we keep missing each other.  Glad to see everybody back!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 12:21:04 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "memphis"
OK, I'll drop the Julia discussion, but I just think it would be ironic if she had gotten Botox or gone under the knife, when she/they cruucified Beth for possibly same.


Also, want to just say that I am so relieved to see that Bailey/Alyce, Loco Stephy, and many others were spoken to by the authorities. I am so glad that someone was listening.  

The pilot/photographer is also very interesting. There is obviously many details we were not privy too.


What is your take on this memphis?  Do you think they could have photographed activities, or a "change of scenery" at the Sloots?  I find that tidbit VERY interesting as well.


Hi monkeys,

I missed the information about the pilot/photographer. Could someone give me a short summary of the discussion?

TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 12:25:13 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "memphis"
OK, I'll drop the Julia discussion, but I just think it would be ironic if she had gotten Botox or gone under the knife, when she/they cruucified Beth for possibly same.


Also, want to just say that I am so relieved to see that Bailey/Alyce, Loco Stephy, and many others were spoken to by the authorities. I am so glad that someone was listening.  

The pilot/photographer is also very interesting. There is obviously many details we were not privy too.


What is your take on this memphis?  Do you think they could have photographed activities, or a "change of scenery" at the Sloots?  I find that tidbit VERY interesting as well.


How many times did Kermit say he came in to make statements, or whatever? IIRC, it was more than a few.

I just think about all of the pics of the VDS grounds, etc., that were floated over the net. Someone took them. Plus, I also thought about Shango  :wink:  saying he sees from afar.

I guess it's just a whole big wad of new possibilities in that one little tidbit of info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:25:18 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
I noticed a few thing last nite.

1. The International Courts set up / agreed to the 2 year statue for suspect status as described by de Sousa. So it seems to be a law after all.

2. As Robots touched on - this will be going on for a few more months due to the forensics apparently collected at the VDS home. The soil samples alone will take quite a bit of time as that stuff is looked at through a microscope grain by grain. It's gonna take some time to conclude whether or not there is anything there outside of eyeballing a fingernail they can match to Natalee's nail polish found in her luggage. (if in fact she wore nail polish).

3. The silence by the KLPD described by Dave is encouraging. The ALE is a sift. They less they know the better it is for everyone. The last thing Family or anyone else needs is someone in the ALE tipping off the suspects, especially Paulus.



Rob,
There are exceptions to the two year law.  For instance, there are investigations going on in Holland that have been going on for five years was the example we were given.

Did you see the press release that the Minister of Justice has already declared that null and void in the case of Joran and that he will remain a suspect INDEFINITELY?

I think the two year law is for lesser crimes as no where has a statute of limitations on murder any more.  At least nowhere that calls itself civilized.

I don't think they would issue a press release if they had not in fact been able to have Joran's status confirmed as indefinite.  Would look bad if he were in fact released.  The two year is to prevent people from being detained without a trial indefinitely mostly.  As we know, Sporter is far from detained and is running amok in Holland bragging how he lies every day while Greta is inclined to believe him.

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 12:27:58 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Everybody was totally immersed in transcripts, Greta, theory and posts were just flying with meaty stuff. I was doing well just to follow along.

FOM chimed in with one line:

" u r making me horny. ................ooops. wrong site."


I was here, and I had to clean off my moniter after that! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


If a book of SM funnies is ever compiled, I vote that exchange as entry #1!



 :arrow: glad to be the class clown guys.....lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 12:29:37 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "memphis"
OK, I'll drop the Julia discussion, but I just think it would be ironic if she had gotten Botox or gone under the knife, when she/they cruucified Beth for possibly same.


Also, want to just say that I am so relieved to see that Bailey/Alyce, Loco Stephy, and many others were spoken to by the authorities. I am so glad that someone was listening.  

The pilot/photographer is also very interesting. There is obviously many details we were not privy too.


What is your take on this memphis?  Do you think they could have photographed activities, or a "change of scenery" at the Sloots?  I find that tidbit VERY interesting as well.


Hi monkeys,

I missed the information about the pilot/photographer. Could someone give me a short summary of the discussion?

TY


There was new info that a Airline Photographer was brought in for questioning something like 6 times....  We suppose he was an arial photographer, but not sure.  This info came from the Deepak/Dr Phil filings (I believe)  

Question is WHY would he be brought in so many times to be questioned?  Very interesting!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:30:17 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
ATTENTION!!

I heard the teaser on FOX NEWS about the Dutch returning to the Sloots for more digging.  I AM NOT TRYING TO START A RUMOR HERE.  PLEASE TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT'S WORTH. Just passing along what I heard.  Sorry for the confusion.

Hmmm, maybe the found something in the earlier dig that warranted a closer look.
This must be terribly disruptive to the VDSs, maybe they can just stay over at Renhos while this is going on.



Maybe they are going back to dig up the POOL!

Maybe that airplane photographer had photos that showed exactly where the new concrete was added.

Maybe, maybe maybe. . . . .I know but for some reason I am very optimistic.  I guess I have finally bought the idea that the Dutch are really searching.  I do now feel that they are, just a feeling and no real proof or reason for feeling so.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 12:30:45 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"

There was new info that a Airline Photographer was brought in for questioning something like 6 times....  We suppose he was an arial photographer, but not sure.  This info came from the Deepak/Dr Phil filings (I believe)  

Question is WHY would he be brought in so many times to be questioned?  Very interesting!


Thanks, Kimmy! I got behind in reading over the weekend when I had company, and I haven't managed to get caught up since.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 12:30:54 PM
How long would it take the Kalpoes to go from their house to Joran's? From Joran's to CnC? Any guesses?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 12:31:04 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "memphis"
OK, I'll drop the Julia discussion, but I just think it would be ironic if she had gotten Botox or gone under the knife, when she/they cruucified Beth for possibly same.


Also, want to just say that I am so relieved to see that Bailey/Alyce, Loco Stephy, and many others were spoken to by the authorities. I am so glad that someone was listening.  

The pilot/photographer is also very interesting. There is obviously many details we were not privy too.


What is your take on this memphis?  Do you think they could have photographed activities, or a "change of scenery" at the Sloots?  I find that tidbit VERY interesting as well.


Hi monkeys,

I missed the information about the pilot/photographer. Could someone give me a short summary of the discussion?

TY


BT, hope this link works...

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=150194&highlight=#150194


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:35:25 PM
Hi, Memphis and FOM!

 :D

I am taking the roller coaster express emotionally and buying into the Dutch search.  I think it is the real deal now.  Did not really until today and just woke up feeling VERY positive about it.

Robots is right.  They don't want an international embarrassment of failure.

Also Julia can quit telling us how to react by saying this will FINALLY put to rest all rumors, etc.

No, it won't.  It would only mean Paulus hid everything.  It will NEVER be put to rest and suspicion off Joran until there is Justice and some other person proven responsible.  Otherwise, he remains the main suspect always and forever in the public opinion.

That's what happens when you lie and lie and say no corpse no case and pour concrete while under suspicion of premeditated murder.

It will change nothing if nothing is found after two years so she better hope they find something.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 12:38:41 PM
hey anna et alll........i just can not believe that he would bury her onhis property.....but lots of killers do....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 12:40:15 PM
Quote from: "memphis"

BT, hope this link works...

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=150194&highlight=#150194


Thanks, Memphis!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:40:48 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
How long would it take the Kalpoes to go from their house to Joran's? From Joran's to CnC? Any guesses?


Not postive but maybe 15-20 minutes?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/arubamaphomes2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 12:42:04 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Rob"
I noticed a few thing last nite.

1. The International Courts set up / agreed to the 2 year statue for suspect status as described by de Sousa. So it seems to be a law after all.

2. As Robots touched on - this will be going on for a few more months due to the forensics apparently collected at the VDS home. The soil samples alone will take quite a bit of time as that stuff is looked at through a microscope grain by grain. It's gonna take some time to conclude whether or not there is anything there outside of eyeballing a fingernail they can match to Natalee's nail polish found in her luggage. (if in fact she wore nail polish).

3. The silence by the KLPD described by Dave is encouraging. The ALE is a sift. They less they know the better it is for everyone. The last thing Family or anyone else needs is someone in the ALE tipping off the suspects, especially Paulus.



Rob,
There are exceptions to the two year law.  For instance, there are investigations going on in Holland that have been going on for five years was the example we were given.

Did you see the press release that the Minister of Justice has already declared that null and void in the case of Joran and that he will remain a suspect INDEFINITELY?

I think the two year law is for lesser crimes as no where has a statute of limitations on murder any more.  At least nowhere that calls itself civilized.

I don't think they would issue a press release if they had not in fact been able to have Joran's status confirmed as indefinite.  Would look bad if he were in fact released.  The two year is to prevent people from being detained without a trial indefinitely mostly.  As we know, Sporter is far from detained and is running amok in Holland bragging how he lies every day while Greta is inclined to believe him.

 :roll:


Anna- I appreciate your comments.
I believe this is all null and void due to the fact that Paulus was released from suspect status.

They knew he was wiretapped and still released him.

And Who was the first person that we know of re-interviewed on Aruba?

If he was not still a suspect, he would not have been re-questioned. They know he is not going to roll over on Joran and vice versa.

I believe Joran's suspect status has been confirmed indefinitely when I see Paulus has had his release from suspect status revoked. JMO anyway.

As for him running amok in Holland, he's been running amok since he was 10 years old and no one did anything about it except a lil sit down with some finger painting with a 'child psychologist' that did seem to get any results. I guess that Drs rep is ruined.

When he's arrested along with his father, I believe it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 12:43:49 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
hey anna et alll........i just can not believe that he would bury her onhis property.....but lots of killers do....


I have a hard time believing it too, but, they had all the "help" on their side.  They could have figured they can keep anyone from searching, and if they just held out, they'd be home free.  Remember Paulus' comment when talking about finding Natalee - "Good luck with THAT"

I still kinda lean towards her disposal at sea, but anything is possible.

I hope in the very least, they find evidence of her presence at that house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:44:15 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
hey anna et alll........i just can not believe that he would bury her onhis property.....but lots of killers do....



The forensic psychiatrists say it gives them a feeling of retaining control over the remains and that alleviates fear of discovery oddly enough.

I wouldn't think Paulus would be that stupid except for his reaction after Natalee disapeared, all that sweating and going to the extreme length of having the actual judge who signed the warrant on hand to countresign it to restrict the scope of the search.

That seems 'way beyond what any innocent person would do.  They'd just let the search go on.  But he had the actual judge who was not even from Aruba in his house to limit it to Joran's apartment which is possibly where Natalee wasn't.

And even Ben Vocking opening the door, a member of the so-called prosecution team to OBSTRUCT the search.

That's a lot for an innocent man with nothing to hide to do.

JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 12:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
hey anna et alll........i just can not believe that he would bury her onhis property.....but lots of killers do....



The forensic psychiatrists say it gives them a feeling of retaining control over the remains and that alleviates fear of discovery oddly enough.

I wouldn't think Paulus would be that stupid except for his reaction after Natalee disapeared, all that sweating and going to the extreme length of having the actual judge who signed the warrant on hand to countresign it to restrict the scope of the search.

That seems 'way beyond what any innocent person would do.  They'd just let the search go on.  But he had the actual judge who was not even from Aruba in his house to limit it to Joran's apartment which is possibly where Natalee wasn't.

And even Ben Vocking opening the door, a member of the so-called prosecution team to OBSTRUCT the search.

That's a lot for an innocent man with nothing to hide to do.

JMO


Absolutely right, Anna. If they were all innocent, why did they put so many obstructions in the way of discovering the truth?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 12:46:55 PM
yea--forgot about judge resrticting search area.....nice work on going thru all those statement Anna..i know others are on them too.....
i don't know how u all find the time...i am only good for a one-liner here and there...lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 12:50:40 PM
Rob,
I think Paulus release from suspect status was local and outside the law and more because he was suing them and had the influence to locally have the laws bent into a pretzel.

They may well have thought we were not paying attention and all was safe.

But there are for sure investigations in Holland that have gone on for longer than two years.

In any event we will soon find out around June 10, right?  

Time flies and I must go pay bills as I did not realize the month had changed on me while I was just trying to keep up in the cage!

One more question. . . .


Isn't Anita still in Holland keeping tabs on the Sporter and his alleged mono? He looks terrible and so well might have some disease or other.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 12:52:04 PM
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 12:53:51 PM
If I was innocent and being accused. I would BEG them to search everything to prove MY innocence.

OT-- Klaas, is there any way for me to turn off  the avi's and graphics on here  temporarily? I looked in my Profile and didn't see anything, but still hoping....    I'm at work, and all the sparkly's and pics. make it so obvious I am not doing 'work' stuff......   Hard to keep up hiding my screen and reading at the same time.  I do have my priorities!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 12:55:20 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 12:56:07 PM
Anna- I have no idea where Anita is. I do know this, their school year is not like ours. The kids go to school til July and have a month off, and then their back to school. So unless they changed that, I would think she is teaching unless she is on a vacation or sabbatical.

It was always weird seeing kids in school uniforms getting ready to get on the bus in July.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 12:56:17 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
hey anna et alll........i just can not believe that he would bury her onhis property.....but lots of killers do....


I have a hard time believing it too, but, they had all the "help" on their side.  They could have figured they can keep anyone from searching, and if they just held out, they'd be home free.  Remember Paulus' comment when talking about finding Natalee - "Good luck with THAT"

I still kinda lean towards her disposal at sea, but anything is possible.

I hope in the very least, they find evidence of her presence at that house.


Me too. Sea that is.

I also agree the suspects got very comfortable at some point, which may  coorespond to them being sure she'll never be found.

I'm hoping for some kind of evidence, but never really expected them to find her body.

Hi Anna!
I'm try to print some stuff and I keep getting RealPlayer popping up on my screen. That has something to do with tr;ying to get SM radio.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 12:56:56 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Hi, Memphis and FOM!

 :D

I am taking the roller coaster express emotionally and buying into the Dutch search.  I think it is the real deal now.  Did not really until today and just woke up feeling VERY positive about it.

Robots is right.  They don't want an international embarrassment of failure.

Also Julia can quit telling us how to react by saying this will FINALLY put to rest all rumors, etc.

No, it won't.  It would only mean Paulus hid everything.  It will NEVER be put to rest and suspicion off Joran until there is Justice and some other person proven responsible.  Otherwise, he remains the main suspect always and forever in the public opinion.

That's what happens when you lie and lie and say no corpse no case and pour concrete while under suspicion of premeditated murder.

It will change nothing if nothing is found after two years so she better hope they find something.

.


Anna, this post is spot on!

And Julia needs to stop whining about the investigation/search costs.
She can take that complaint to the Van der Sloots. In fact, Aruba should send them the bill!

Julia would be smart to hope that the Dutch investigators find
forensic evidence and put the perps away because THAT RESULT
and ONLY THAT RESULT will let Aruba move on.

JUSTICE          

CLOSE WON'T CUT IT

JUSTICE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 12:57:21 PM
the DUTCH had a choice

CHOICE #1

read over the statements, ponder them, and eventually end up with the
same CONCLUSION as ALE all done from an office in their own country.



CHOICE #2

get results and solve the case  so that they will never be COMPARED to the HORRIBLE investigation that occured by ALE




im going with OPTION #2  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 12:59:08 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Rob,
I think Paulus release from suspect status was local and outside the law and more because he was suing them and had the influence to locally have the laws bent into a pretzel.

They may well have thought we were not paying attention and all was safe.

But there are for sure investigations in Holland that have gone on for longer than two years.

In any event we will soon find out around June 10, right?  

Time flies and I must go pay bills as I did not realize the month had changed on me while I was just trying to keep up in the cage!

One more question. . . .


Isn't Anita still in Holland keeping tabs on the Sporter and his alleged mono? He looks terrible and so well might have some disease or other.

.


Also, I think Paulus' release as a "suspect" is in no way indicitive of how they view his son as one.  Remember, Joran and the K2's were the last known people to have been seen with Natalee alive.  That much is proven FACT, and cannot be disputed.  How Paulus plays into this case is a bit more interpretive, therefore harder to prove.  It wasn't suprising that he was released officially as a suspect at the time it happened.  Sure, he probably guilty of some degree of involvement.  But, I think the bigger "fish" to fry in this case is the son, not the father...

Of course, I said there'd be no way in hell Joran would have been released from custody a year and change ago.  I was tragically wrong there.  But, I feel kind of the same way about this 2-year nonsense.  I'd be inclined to believe he'll remain a suspect until he is exonorated, or that title changes to convicted murderer.

Just my 2 cents.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:00:09 PM
the DUTCH team Sees the ELEPHANT in the living room


ALE attempted to make it DISAPPEAR


elephants dont disappear



unlesss you think that magicians and illusionists have REAL POWERS



note.........they dont have special powers  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 01:03:37 PM
Quote from: "robots"
the DUTCH team Sees the ELEPHANT in the living room


ALE attempted to make it DISAPPEAR


elephants dont disappear



unlesss you think that magicians and illusionists have REAL POWERS



note.........they dont have special powers  8)


 :lol:

I'll catch ya'll later. Real Player is copying everything on my gigabank and won't stop.  :?  Getting frustrated....must concentrate....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 01:03:54 PM
'...He (Joran) looks terrible and so well might have some disease or other. "


Yes, Joran has Dutch-are-closing-in-on-me-itis.
Pre-jail jitters. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:04:07 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "robots"
the DUTCH team Sees the ELEPHANT in the living room


ALE attempted to make it DISAPPEAR


elephants dont disappear



unlesss you think that magicians and illusionists have REAL POWERS



note.........they dont have special powers  8)


 :lol:

I'll catch ya'll later. Real Player is copying everything on my gigabank and won't stop.  :?  Getting frustrated....must concentrate....



 :shock:


LOL

see ya


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:08:07 PM
Here's my only issue with the "concrete pouring" theory:

We all know that if anything, Paulus was well educated in the legal system and the ALE's investigative practices.  His notorious "no body, no case" advice is a glaing example of that.  This being the case, couldn't you assume that he'd be well aware of the risk of his encasing Natalee's remains in concrete on his very own property?  Surely all it would take would be a simple search to uncover her remains, and then all bets would be off for him and his son?  He may be a lot of things (mostly BAD), but unintelligent don't seem to be one of them...

I do believe Natalee's body was staged on that property for a very short amount of time.  Once they had the opportunity, they moved her...most likely to the ocean.

Thoughts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 01:08:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.

Do you have a copy of that wiretap and also Deepak's email where he reportedly says he had sex with Natalee? These two statements are really starting to bother me, I would like to look at them again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:09:55 PM
Quote from: "robots"
the DUTCH team Sees the ELEPHANT in the living room


ALE attempted to make it DISAPPEAR


elephants dont disappear



unlesss you think that magicians and illusionists have REAL POWERS



note.........they dont have special powers  8)


What do you mean...they don't?!?!  So, you're telling me that I paid over $300 in Vegas, and didn't witness authentic powers being exhibited by a true wizard?!?!

I feel dirty and used... :oops:  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: memphis on May 02, 2007, 01:10:10 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Here's my only issue with the "concrete pouring" theory:

We all know that if anything, Paulus was well educated in the legal system and the ALE's investigative practices.  His notorious "no body, no case" advice is a glaing example of that.  This being the case, couldn't you assume that he'd be well aware of the risk of his encasing Natalee's remains in concrete on his very own property?  Surely all it would take would be a simple search to uncover her remains, and then all bets would be off for him and his son?  He may be a lot of things (mostly BAD), but unintelligent don't seem to be one of them...

I do believe Natalee's body was staged on that property for a very short amount of time.  Once they had the opportunity, they moved her...most likely to the ocean.

Thoughts?


Agreed, and well said.

That's  exactly what I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:10:47 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "robots"
the DUTCH team Sees the ELEPHANT in the living room


ALE attempted to make it DISAPPEAR


elephants dont disappear



unlesss you think that magicians and illusionists have REAL POWERS



note.........they dont have special powers  8)


What do you mean...they don't?!?!  So, you're telling me that I paid over $300 in Vegas, and didn't witness authentic powers being exhibited by a true wizard?!?!

I feel dirty and used... :oops:  :cry:





 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 01:10:50 PM
Spock-----someone will help.....monkeys must be at lunch..
i am going too........

HI ROBOTS!
HI KLASS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:11:29 PM
Hi Hi 8)

I think they released Paulus from suspect status so he could be sworn in to the Bar of Aruba and the Netherland Antilles. :wink: Then open up his own law firm.


Carlo & van der Sloot is located in the island of Aruba, Dutch Caribbean. We are a full service law firm, with attorneys who practice in all areas of the law. The attorneys of our law firm are members of the Bar of Aruba and of the Netherlands Antilles and are licensed to practice in both jurisdictions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:12:01 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.

Do you have a copy of that wiretap and also Deepak's email where he reportedly says he had sex with Natalee? These two statements are really starting to bother me, I would like to look at them again.

The wiretap info was from a Diario article as relayed by one of their reporters that were outside the courthouse and not dismissed by Joran supporters.  Red did a front page on it, I'll try to find it.  I don't have time to search right now though as I need to run to the store.  

Deepak emails are in the Important Case Document forum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:13:02 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Spock-----someone will help.....monkeys must be at lunch..
i am going too........

HI ROBOTS!
HI KLASS!



 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:13:26 PM
Need to run to the store, brb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 02, 2007, 01:16:17 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
How long would it take the Kalpoes to go from their house to Joran's? From Joran's to CnC? Any guesses?


2K to JVDS 20 - 25 minutes

JVDS to C&C's  15 minutes

I found my notes

Howdy Monkeys!!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 01:16:51 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
OT-- Klaas, is there any way for me to turn off  the avi's and graphics on here  temporarily? I looked in my Profile and didn't see anything, but still hoping....    I'm at work, and all the sparkly's and pics. make it so obvious I am not doing 'work' stuff......   Hard to keep up hiding my screen and reading at the same time.  I do have my priorities!  :wink:

LOL!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:19:57 PM
Nothing new today? You would think all those KLPD are busy doing something...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 01:20:59 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Need to run to the store, brb


u go to the store alot....lol

 :arrow: r u really off having a quickie????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:21:30 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Need to run to the store, brb


u go to the store alot....lol

 :arrow: r u really off having a quickie????


hehehehehehee

CODE WORD = ??????????????????????????????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:21:40 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Need to run to the store, brb


u go to the store alot....lol

 :arrow: r u really off having a quickie????


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 02, 2007, 01:25:16 PM
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 01:27:43 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Forgive me if someone else has posted this prior but I was just watching the replays of Greta on the FP last night, and read thru the comments and found this one made a short while ago?

It's #19 by Melissa?

I cannot listen to Julia Renfro’s irritating voice. I am tired of hearing her say how much money Aruba has spent on the Natalee Holloway “vanishment”. I lived in Aruba and I know more about Julia than I care to. For instance, her children are fathered by different men - the last being her married black boy friend. She should just keep her mouth shut and perhaps take a look in the mirror.

Comment by Melissa | May 2, 2007, 11:06 am


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


And wouldn't that increase her chances of being somehow directly related to an interested party in this mess....go Melissa, tell more.




Just reading and catching up and saw this....

I am the mother of two children by different fathers..ALot of you guys have known me for a longtime...Even though I dont like Julia Renfro..AT ALL...Lets try and keep these kind of comments to a minimum, if yall dont mind...
I know for a fact that I am not involved in anything shady, nor are my chances of being so higher because I have two kids by two different dads....I am a very responsible, intelligent human being...I am a single mom that busts her hump, has no man in her life, and would go to the ends of the earth to do the right thing...
So, if we are gonna judge, lets just on what we know as fact...and not on someone's personal issues....Just my humble opinion....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 01:27:50 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


Pssstttt.....I think FOM has s-e-x on the brain.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 01:29:34 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 02, 2007, 01:30:17 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


Pssstttt.....I think FOM has s-e-x on the brain.  :lol:



No Comment   :oops:    :D    :lol:    8)     :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:31:56 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Forgive me if someone else has posted this prior but I was just watching the replays of Greta on the FP last night, and read thru the comments and found this one made a short while ago?

It's #19 by Melissa?

I cannot listen to Julia Renfro’s irritating voice. I am tired of hearing her say how much money Aruba has spent on the Natalee Holloway “vanishment”. I lived in Aruba and I know more about Julia than I care to. For instance, her children are fathered by different men - the last being her married black boy friend. She should just keep her mouth shut and perhaps take a look in the mirror.

Comment by Melissa | May 2, 2007, 11:06 am


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


And wouldn't that increase her chances of being somehow directly related to an interested party in this mess....go Melissa, tell more.




Just reading and catching up and saw this....

I am the mother of two children by different fathers..ALot of you guys have known me for a longtime...Even though I dont like Julia Renfro..AT ALL...Lets try and keep these kind of comments to a minimum, if yall dont mind...
I know for a fact that I am not involved in anything shady, nor are my chances of being so higher because I have two kids by two different dads....I am a very responsible, intelligent human being...I am a single mom that busts her hump, has no man in her life, and would go to the ends of the earth to do the right thing...
So, if we are gonna judge, lets just on what we know as fact...and not on someone's personal issues....Just my humble opinion....


EXTREMELY well said nikki!  I agree 1000%.  One of the best posts I've read in a while.

Much respect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:32:33 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?


Yup Joran confessed on june 10th..The coverup was in full swing after that..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 02, 2007, 01:32:34 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?


Yep!!  Good to see ya man.  Hey......you're not nekky

Also ya'll need to keep in mind that pouring concrete does not ness. mean depth.  Could just be an overlayment to cover up stains such as blood, etc.?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 01:33:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.

Do you have a copy of that wiretap and also Deepak's email where he reportedly says he had sex with Natalee? These two statements are really starting to bother me, I would like to look at them again.

The wiretap info was from a Diario article as relayed by one of their reporters that were outside the courthouse and not dismissed by Joran supporters.  Red did a front page on it, I'll try to find it.  I don't have time to search right now though as I need to run to the store.  

Deepak emails are in the Important Case Document forum.


Beth has it written down that Paulus said he picked up Joran at McDonalds at 4 am, we have a wiretap, and a statemnt by 2 police officers that they heard the comment also.

The email is not in your archives, it was written to a friend in the states, as I recall.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 01:35:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.


Klaas ... I cannot comprehend why this wiretap evidence did not stand in the way of favorable rulings when Paulus was released from detention ... when the scope of the official search warrant was reduced ... when he was declared no longer a suspect and ... when he was awarded compensation.  Why did the Superior Court rule negatively in regards to Paulus' motion for further compensation?  The wiretap evidence never made any difference in previous ruling which benefited Paulus.

Janet

http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:36:50 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.


Klaas ... I cannot comprehend why this wiretap evidence did not stand in the way of favorable rulings when Paulus was released from detention ... when the scope of the official search warrant was reduced ... when he was declared no longer a suspect and ... when he was awarded compensation.  Why did the Superior Court rule negatively in regards to Paulus' motion for further compensation?  The wiretap evidence never made any difference in previous ruling which benefited Paulus.

Janet

http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html


they thought they could get away with it
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 01:37:02 PM
Thanks, Third...I get SO HOT when people judge women on whether or not they are "easy" based on how many kids they have  with how many"fathers"...

Like I said, we need to judge based on FACT..not based on hearsay, not based on what someone who claims to live in Aruba claims they know abour someone...

I dont like Julia, but it is based on the fact that I dont like her statements..Not because of how many kids she has by how many dads...That is her personal business...not ours...And we need to be careful of how many of our Monkey friends we may be offending by making statements like "oh, that proves she's easy...whore...slut..." etc....

I will not air my dirty laundry on Red's site..But I will be happy to tell you MY personal story if anyone cares to listen...I am in NO WAY a slut, whore, etc...

So, please, lets judge her, like i said, based on FACT...We all know we dont like her...
Lets watch how we say and word things so as not to offend.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:38:05 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Thanks, Third...I get SO HOT when people judge women on whether or not they are "easy" based on how many kids they have  with how many"fathers"...

Like I said, we need to judge based on FACT..not based on hearsay, not based on what someone who claims to live in Aruba claims they know abour someone...

I dont like Julia, but it is based on the fact that I dont like her statements..Not because of how many kids she has by how many dads...That is her personal business...not ours...And we need to be careful of how many of our Monkey friends we may be offending by making statements like "oh, that proves she's easy...whore...slut..." etc....

I will not air my dirty laundry on Red's site..But I will be happy to tell you MY personal story if anyone cares to listen...I am in NO WAY a slut, whore, etc...

So, please, lets judge her, like i said, based on FACT...We all know we dont like her...
Lets watch how we say and word things so as not to offend.....



i think youre RIGHT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 01:39:08 PM
if i have ever said anything to offend anyone...im sorry

ROBOTS BLANKET APOLOGY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frank on May 02, 2007, 01:42:30 PM
She's a whore, obviously.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 01:44:21 PM
I am sorry to be so upfront about it...No offense, just asking for people to be a little more respectful...Sometimes, when we intend to slam someone, we dont know how many people that are our friends that are sitting on the other end of the screen going, "WTF"??

Yes..I have two kiddos by two different dads..So, that is my point...we never know who we may offend.....

I consider them both blessings from God..Both have unique talents, etc....
I am not a one to condone murder, cover it up, associate with those who are..and if I am not mistaken, Beth Twitty has two different fathers for her kids...At least the young one....I highly respect her..

So, lets lay that to rest, shall we?

<sorry..Nikki cannot forget her prior mod status..lol>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:45:00 PM
Quote from: "Frank"
She's a whore, obviously.


Who's a whore?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 02, 2007, 01:48:20 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


Way to go, Snoopy!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 01:50:25 PM
I agree with Snoop Dawg that the concrete could have been poured to cover up blood stains, rather than to conceal a body. I can imagine that on some surfaces it would be almost impossible to completely eradicate blood stains.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 01:51:40 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I am sorry to be so upfront about it...No offense, just asking for people to be a little more respectful...Sometimes, when we intend to slam someone, we dont know how many people that are our friends that are sitting on the other end of the screen going, "WTF"??

Yes..I have two kiddos by two different dads..So, that is my point...we never know who we may offend.....

I consider them both blessings from God..Both have unique talents, etc....
I am not a one to condone murder, cover it up, associate with those who are..and if I am not mistaken, Beth Twitty has two different fathers for her kids...At least the young one....I highly respect her..

So, lets lay that to rest, shall we?

<sorry..Nikki cannot forget her prior mod status..lol>


i dont see what any of this has to do with some tv whore screwing around making babies with a married man.  I dont see any reason for you to be offended by whoever posted that about J.R. and i think JR fully deserves any sort of bashing she gets based on what she dishes out.  If she cant take it then she should just STFU.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 01:53:53 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I agree with Snoop Dawg that the concrete could have been poured to cover up blood stains, rather than to conceal a body. I can imagine that on some surfaces it would be almost impossible to completely eradicate blood stains.


BINGO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Peaches on May 02, 2007, 01:54:04 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I am sorry to be so upfront about it...No offense, just asking for people to be a little more respectful...Sometimes, when we intend to slam someone, we dont know how many people that are our friends that are sitting on the other end of the screen going, "WTF"??

Yes..I have two kiddos by two different dads..So, that is my point...we never know who we may offend.....

I consider them both blessings from God..Both have unique talents, etc....
I am not a one to condone murder, cover it up, associate with those who are..and if I am not mistaken, Beth Twitty has two different fathers for her kids...At least the young one....I highly respect her..

So, lets lay that to rest, shall we?

<sorry..Nikki cannot forget her prior mod status..lol>


Nikki, dear, that comment came from somebody on the FP, not here.  So you have two kids with 2 different men.   :shock:   This is hardly unusual.  Some of us have been married more than once.  :shock:  BFD.  We love you just the way you are.

And Julia is still a hag.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 01:54:24 PM
Quote from: "Frank"
She's a whore, obviously.


I concur.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:55:20 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I am sorry to be so upfront about it...No offense, just asking for people to be a little more respectful...Sometimes, when we intend to slam someone, we dont know how many people that are our friends that are sitting on the other end of the screen going, "WTF"??

Yes..I have two kiddos by two different dads..So, that is my point...we never know who we may offend.....

I consider them both blessings from God..Both have unique talents, etc....
I am not a one to condone murder, cover it up, associate with those who are..and if I am not mistaken, Beth Twitty has two different fathers for her kids...At least the young one....I highly respect her..

So, lets lay that to rest, shall we?

<sorry..Nikki cannot forget her prior mod status..lol>


i dont see what any of this has to do with some tv whore screwing around making babies with a married man.  I dont see any reason for you to be offended by whoever posted that about J.R. and i think JR fully deserves any sort of bashing she gets based on what she dishes out.  If she cant take it then she should just STFU.


Don't agree.  What seperates us from those other uncivilized websites is our respectability and class.  Calling someone out of their name doesn't do much for enforcing that fact...

Again, I feel Julia earns more then her share of critical comments based on her lack of intelligence and tact regading this case.  I don't think her child bearing practices should have any place in determining that...

Just my 2 cents.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:56:03 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.


Klaas ... I cannot comprehend why this wiretap evidence did not stand in the way of favorable rulings when Paulus was released from detention ... when the scope of the official search warrant was reduced ... when he was declared no longer a suspect and ... when he was awarded compensation.  Why did the Superior Court rule negatively in regards to Paulus' motion for further compensation?  The wiretap evidence never made any difference in previous ruling which benefited Paulus.

Janet

http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html


Because KJ didn't release that information to the Judge at that time.  The judge can only rule by what he is given by the Prosecutors office.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 01:56:14 PM
Thats all I was trying to say, thirdstrike..Thank you  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 01:56:18 PM
Quote from: "robots"
if i have ever said anything to offend anyone...im sorry

ROBOTS BLANKET APOLOGY


Robots, now I'm gonna have to go back and think of something you've done to offend me just so I can take advantage of your blanket apology. I mean, heck, if somebody is giving something away free, I might as well get my share - right?  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 01:56:48 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Forgive me if someone else has posted this prior but I was just watching the replays of Greta on the FP last night, and read thru the comments and found this one made a short while ago?

It's #19 by Melissa?

I cannot listen to Julia Renfro’s irritating voice. I am tired of hearing her say how much money Aruba has spent on the Natalee Holloway “vanishment”. I lived in Aruba and I know more about Julia than I care to. For instance, her children are fathered by different men - the last being her married black boy friend. She should just keep her mouth shut and perhaps take a look in the mirror.

Comment by Melissa | May 2, 2007, 11:06 am


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


And wouldn't that increase her chances of being somehow directly related to an interested party in this mess....go Melissa, tell more.




Just reading and catching up and saw this....

I am the mother of two children by different fathers..ALot of you guys have known me for a longtime...Even though I dont like Julia Renfro..AT ALL...Lets try and keep these kind of comments to a minimum, if yall dont mind...
I know for a fact that I am not involved in anything shady, nor are my chances of being so higher because I have two kids by two different dads....I am a very responsible, intelligent human being...I am a single mom that busts her hump, has no man in her life, and would go to the ends of the earth to do the right thing...
So, if we are gonna judge, lets just on what we know as fact...and not on someone's personal issues....Just my humble opinion....


Nikki, I'll be brief but I can assure you my post had no intention of reflecting upon you or attacking JRenfro if that's what you are implying. I found it interesting and I trust Klaas will edit it if she feels it necessary to remove it.

Lately it seems some are reverting back to personal attacks and I find that very troubling as well, but I keep my mouth shut about it.

have a great day


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Frank on May 02, 2007, 01:57:08 PM
I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about Greta and Arlene.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 01:57:09 PM
Any comments can be made to me directly..nikkibnurse@aol.com...same AIM addy...
Other than that, Lets drop this .....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 01:58:53 PM
Quote from: "Frank"
I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about Greta and Arlene.


I don't believe ANY woman should be called out of their name...regardless of how one feels about them...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 01:59:27 PM
Quote from: "Frank"
I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about Greta and Arlene.



very easy to see why you would have thought so....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 01:59:30 PM
Thanks..Like I said, I have problems with JR as well..Just dont find the appropriateness in bashing her child rearing practices....

Some may have found it offensive about the "black man" comment...

To each his own, right?

We just need to watch who we may offend..end of story.... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 01:59:51 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"

So, if we are gonna judge, lets just on what we know as fact...and not on someone's personal issues....Just my humble opinion....


Words of Wisdom!

Thank you nikki

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 01:59:53 PM
MY SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE

Stop taking things so personal!  The post about Renfro was a post on the front page of SM copied here in the forum.  It's the front page posters personal opinion of Julia Renfro, THAT'S ALL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 01:59:54 PM
See I disagree Nikki, you opened this discussion and in my past experiences going "private" as you call it only contributes further to forwarded emails and etcetera. I won't participate further period but that is my decision, not yours.

I see plenty here on the lively to discuss of merit beyond the few posts I have made so please have at it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:01:02 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Lately it seems some are reverting back to personal attacks and I find that very troubling as well, but I keep my mouth shut about it.

have a great day


I don't think we should none!  Personal attacks have no place in this forum.  We're above that.  We set the bar, and it's our collective responsibility to keep it as high as possible...

And, you have a GREAT day yourself!  ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 02:01:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
MY SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE

Stop taking things so personal!  The post about Renfro was a post on the front page of SM copied here in the forum.  It's the front page posters personal opinion of Julia Renfro, THAT'S ALL.


Great suggestion !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:01:52 PM
BTW- Beth Twitty doesnt have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:02:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
MY SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE

Stop taking things so personal!  The post about Renfro was a post on the front page of SM copied here in the forum.  It's the front page posters personal opinion of Julia Renfro, THAT'S ALL.


Would it have been possible to have edited that FP poster's comment out instead of allowing it to stick up in here?

Just a suggestion?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 02:03:46 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
MY SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE

Stop taking things so personal!  The post about Renfro was a post on the front page of SM copied here in the forum.  It's the front page posters personal opinion of Julia Renfro, THAT'S ALL.


Would it have been possible to have edited that FP poster's comment out instead of allowing it to stick up in here?

Just a suggestion?


oh yeah thats what we need, MORE CENSORSHIP!!

 :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:03:52 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
MY SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE

Stop taking things so personal!  The post about Renfro was a post on the front page of SM copied here in the forum.  It's the front page posters personal opinion of Julia Renfro, THAT'S ALL.


Would it have been possible to have edited that FP poster's comment out instead of allowing it to stick up in here?

Just a suggestion?


Would you like to be a moderator?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:04:00 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
BTW- Beth Twitty doesnt have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


At the same time, I'm not so sure Beth would condone calling other women who have kids by 2 different fathers "whores"... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:05:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "klaasend"
MY SUGGESTION TO EVERYONE

Stop taking things so personal!  The post about Renfro was a post on the front page of SM copied here in the forum.  It's the front page posters personal opinion of Julia Renfro, THAT'S ALL.


Would it have been possible to have edited that FP poster's comment out instead of allowing it to stick up in here?

Just a suggestion?


Would you like to be a moderator?


Not at all klass.  At the same time, I don't want to be a cop either, but I'll for sure be critical of their abilities to protect us if need be...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:05:12 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
BTW- Beth Twitty doesnt have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


At the same time, I'm not so sure Beth would condone calling other women who have kids by 2 different fathers "whores"... :roll:


I didn't hear Beth say that.. did you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 02:05:22 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Do we know if Julia Renfro is actually married?

Technically, maybe. I do know that in June 05 when Renfro was *helping* Natalee's family that an American girlfriend of hers came to visit. This girlfriend had an affair with Renfro's husband.

This is not really *news* but Renfro is a public figure who inserted herself into this case in a biased manner. It also might explain how Renfro's twisted mind can summon up the extreme hatred she has directed towards Natalee and her family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 02:05:36 PM
Sigh....It wasnt the posters comment that bothered me so much as it was some of our fellow monkeys  saying, "right! Whore!" etc etc...And chiming in..I was giving another perspective....

I just wanted to simply state my opinion on it...I was offended, yes..and I wont apologize for that...

I will apologize if any of YOU think that i was offensive to YOU..I was simply giving My opinion which we All do....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 02:05:47 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
BTW- Beth Twitty doesnt have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


At the same time, I'm not so sure Beth would condone calling other women who have kids by 2 different fathers "whores"... :roll:


you have comopletely twisted the original post into something different, go back and re-read it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:06:02 PM
Thirdstrike - lately it seems everytime you stop by you want to be a moderator here.  Maybe you should contact Red and see if he'll take you up on it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:06:28 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
BTW- Beth Twitty doesnt have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


At the same time, I'm not so sure Beth would condone calling other women who have kids by 2 different fathers "whores"... :roll:


I didn't hear Beth say that.. did you?


Not saying she did.  I'm saying that she's the epitomy of class, and I'd be willing to bet that word has probably never come out of her mouth...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:06:47 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?



And right before the bogus SEARCH!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 02:08:26 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?



And right before the bogus SEARCH!


thanks for getting back on topic,  what was the dtae of the bogus search, do you know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 02:09:19 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Lately it seems some are reverting back to personal attacks and I find that very troubling as well, but I keep my mouth shut about it.

have a great day


I don't think we should none!  Personal attacks have no place in this forum.  We're above that.  We set the bar, and it's our collective responsibility to keep it as high as possible...

And, you have a GREAT day yourself!  ;)


yes you have effectively twisted a FP post into a slam of a racial nature which I highly resent and do see quite clearly what the goal is here.

I however cannot forget that Julia RENFRO stated to the whole world who would listen that Natalee was pregnant with her stepfather's baby??????

double standards don't impress me and yes please no crytic winks again either as I object to a subtle attack.

There is much to discuss, blah and frank are here as well and both seem to have something to contribute so I hope and pray you can now allow that to happen?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:11:58 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I agree with Snoop Dawg that the concrete could have been poured to cover up blood stains, rather than to conceal a body. I can imagine that on some surfaces it would be almost impossible to completely eradicate blood stains.



I doubt anybody much thinks at this late date they will locate a whole, intact body.  Forensic evidence of her being there is what I am hoping for, something with DNA, or maybe even fingerprints on things.  A murder weapon, could be just about anything.

Just hoping they can find something!  Oh, and I don't believe cadaver dogs can tell the difference between corpses.  In other words, they can't tell for sure it was Natalee in a certain place, maybe temporarily, let's say.  Only that a deceased human was there at one time.  But they can do that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:12:06 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thirdstrike - lately it seems everytime you stop by you want to be a moderator here.  Maybe you should contact Red and see if he'll take you up on it.


Sorry you feel that way.  I can assure you it's not the case though...

I'm a little confused as to the resistance by many in here to be against having to hear women refered to as "whores" and "sluts" because of the way they live their life instead of what they say about this case.  I have a daughter...a mother...and a sister.  And, I would NEVER want them to be refered to by that name...regardless of what people think of them.  It's abusive, unintelligent, and outright ugly.

What I've always enjoyed about coming here is the dignity and class of the people and information being relayed to the collective via the boards.  I've heard MANY complain about those other places being more about name calling then investigative relevance.  This place has always...for me anyway...been about the facts.  Why can't I voice my displeasure when it's not?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:13:05 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
BTW- Beth Twitty doesnt have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


At the same time, I'm not so sure Beth would condone calling other women who have kids by 2 different fathers "whores"... :roll:


I didn't hear Beth say that.. did you?


Not saying she did.  I'm saying that she's the epitomy of class, and I'd be willing to bet that word has probably never come out of her mouth...


TS, I'm not going to argue with you about something we obviously agree upon. I don't like Julia, her tactics, her motives, or her personality. Personally, I think she is despicable.

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Julia4-1.jpg)

And that crap she pulled claiming Jug pushed.... and then she created a diversion on 6-13-2005 when she tracked Jug and his friends down when they were shopping for clothes and told them that Natalee would be presented at the courthouse...

This woman has more than an active role in the disinformation. And that's not just my opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:13:24 PM
Thirdstrike - you are perpetuating it now.  You are bringing far more attention to it than it deserves.  Please stop discussion the issue.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 02:14:21 PM
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: thirdstrike on May 02, 2007, 02:14:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thirdstrike - you are perpetuating it now.  You are bringing far more attention to it than it deserves.  Please stop discussion the issue.


Yes Ma'am!  As you wish...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 02:16:10 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I agree with Snoop Dawg that the concrete could have been poured to cover up blood stains, rather than to conceal a body. I can imagine that on some surfaces it would be almost impossible to completely eradicate blood stains.



I doubt anybody much thinks at this late date they will locate a whole, intact body.  Forensic evidence of her being there is what I am hoping for, something with DNA, or maybe even fingerprints on things.  A murder weapon, could be just about anything.

Just hoping they can find something!  Oh, and I don't believe cadaver dogs can tell the difference between corpses.  In other words, they can't tell for sure it was Natalee in a certain place, maybe temporarily, let's say.  Only that a deceased human was there at one time.  But they can do that.

.


Yep, me too, Anna. I think if they can find any forensic evidence at all that Natalee was there in that house, it will be a victory. I'd be happy with one of her fingernails if that was all they could find.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 02, 2007, 02:17:14 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?



And right before the bogus SEARCH!


thanks for getting back on topic,  what was the dtae of the bogus search, do you know?


Sorry Blah I can't find that in my notes.  I've got about a 3" stack of paper, and I'm multitasking as usual.  Maybe somebody else knows.  I have glanced through a lot of other stuff that really raises some red flags.  Wish I had more time to bring them out for discussion.  Prolly tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:18:23 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: snoopy on May 02, 2007, 02:18:25 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I agree with Snoop Dawg that the concrete could have been poured to cover up blood stains, rather than to conceal a body. I can imagine that on some surfaces it would be almost impossible to completely eradicate blood stains.



I doubt anybody much thinks at this late date they will locate a whole, intact body.  Forensic evidence of her being there is what I am hoping for, something with DNA, or maybe even fingerprints on things.  A murder weapon, could be just about anything.

Just hoping they can find something!  Oh, and I don't believe cadaver dogs can tell the difference between corpses.  In other words, they can't tell for sure it was Natalee in a certain place, maybe temporarily, let's say.  Only that a deceased human was there at one time.  But they can do that.

.


Yep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:20:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:21:41 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?



And right before the bogus SEARCH!


thanks for getting back on topic,  what was the dtae of the bogus search, do you know?



I want to say June 16.  My memory only says June 16 or 19,  don't have doc for that but bet somebody does.  So the concrete was VERY fresh when the searchers were there and no one said a word about it???

WTH were they thinking!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 02:23:11 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.


Wasn't he planning to do a deepwater search a while back and couldn't get some permits to do it? Maybe the paperwork takes a certain amount of time to go through.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nikkibnurse on May 02, 2007, 02:23:18 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.



I agree, and that is what prompted my question....When I found out they were going back,my heart leapt...I know they turned that island upside down the last time they were there...I love Tim Miller..have the  most respect for him...would like to see him President... :D

I feel that if TES is going b ack, they must have something to go on....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 02:25:52 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005.  Beth was at the home on June 21st .

Rock On!!  8)

FOM you bad monkey!!  :lol:


isnt that right after the confession was given/retracted?



And right before the bogus SEARCH!


thanks for getting back on topic,  what was the dtae of the bogus search, do you know?



I want to say June 16.  My memory only says June 16 or 19,  don't have doc for that but bet somebody does.  So the concrete was VERY fresh when the searchers were there and no one said a word about it???

WTH were they thinking!

.


LOL!! We know that one area the ALE was very interested to look at was the garden..Was that from obvious change in the landscape or they already had a tip?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:28:55 PM
I think the VDS home was searched on 6-15-2005.. I'm looking through some stuff, but I don't see the exact date.. I'm almost sure it was 6-15-2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 02:30:21 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.


Hi Monkeys, Just here for a moment.
I personally hope the Dutch prosecutors find something to prosecute someone. As much as I would like to see Natalee found I would prefer she was found by the Dutch.

Tim and Tes do so much for missing people. I would rather they save there time, money and effort for a later time.JMHO

I do find it reallly interesting that the concrete was done so early in the investigation. OK Bye now


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:31:00 PM
Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property.

Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

MORE COMEMENCIA WAS AT THE VAN DER SLOOT HOUSE:

Updated Wed. Jun. 15, 2005 10:37 PM ET

Associated Press

NOORD, Aruba -- Aruban police Wednesday searched the home of a high-ranking Dutch judicial official whose son was with an Alabama honors student the night she disappeared, carrying out plastic garbage bags full of items and towing away two vehicles.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:31:01 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Rob"
BTW- Beth Twitty doesn't have two kids by two different fathers. Let's not get that rumor goin'.


At the same time, I'm not so sure Beth would condone calling other women who have kids by 2 different fathers "whores"... :roll:


I didn't hear Beth say that.. did you?


Not saying she did.  I'm saying that she's the epitomy of class, and I'd be willing to bet that word has probably never come out of her mouth...




You have no way of knowing any such thing, XXX.  You might be surprised at the words that will come out of somebody's mouth when they are pushed beyond human endurance.

Three children with three fathers, not two, but the last one was a married man was the point.  I think biracial children have special issues to deal with sometimes and they need their fathers more than single race children.  I say this as the mother of biracial children, mine are beautiful tan Hispanics and I made sure their father was in their life for guidance with those issues until the last one graduated from high school and it was not easy.  But I did it.

I have been married more than once, big whoop, but only once in the Church.  I don't think the comments about certain people are based just on their childbearing practices but what some of us have been told was their occupation or hobby or whatever in years past.

No one with a brain thinks a woman with children by more than one man is a bad person, has nothing to do with character.  The person being bashed has other issued that do and I don't like that married man business.  That is a major no no in my book, I don't care who you are.

Being single again, I have married men hit on me all the time and I send them packing in short order!  I have no respect for any woman who is willing to destroy the family of another.  Don't even think about it if you are married!  

If that offends, I am sorry but it is what I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:33:04 PM
here is the link to the last post I made.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159601,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 02, 2007, 02:33:42 PM
so, I noticed again that the Natalee Behavior section of the wikipedia article is GONE again.

Just thought ya'll might want to know.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:34:55 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
here is the link to the last post I made.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159601,00.html


Thanks Rob.

Snoopy's post:

Also found in my notes that the new concrete around the pool area was done between June 12 - 15, 2005. Beth was at the home on June 21st .


So the search was on June 15 of the sloot home, right after the concrete work was done?  No wonder PVDS didn't want a complete search.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 02:34:56 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property.

Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

MORE COMEMENCIA WAS AT THE VAN DER SLOOT HOUSE:

Updated Wed. Jun. 15, 2005 10:37 PM ET

Associated Press

NOORD, Aruba -- Aruban police Wednesday searched the home of a high-ranking Dutch judicial official whose son was with an Alabama honors student the night she disappeared, carrying out plastic garbage bags full of items and towing away two vehicles.


Bah.. Papito also handled the Jogger and the Kalpoe Vehicle..You hear TJ Wards Radio Interview? He thinks they got the wrong car!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:36:02 PM
Quote from: "jill"
so, I noticed again that the Natalee Behavior section of the wikipedia article is GONE again.

Just thought ya'll might want to know.

 :D

It's a constant battle.  It just proves what a farce Wiki can be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 02:37:56 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.

Rob,
On one of Dana’s interviews, might have even been last year, Tim said he thought Natalee’s body was in the ocean and is recoverable.  And at that time TES was about $100K short in funds to do the search.
I agree, I doubt Tim and TES are going to do a deep sea search based on a whim.  I think he knows something that’s not been made common knowledge to the general public.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:38:12 PM
Quote from: "jill"
so, I noticed again that the Natalee Behavior section of the wikipedia article is GONE again.

Just thought ya'll might want to know.

 :D



Is this not just WILD!!  We remove the lies and somebody puts them back up again!!

They must monitor it every day.

Perhaps we should, too, to make sure its not put back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 02:39:29 PM
:::stomps on cooties::::

Sorry.  I peeked in at RU to see if the head of the NFI had contacted Julie Renfroe or anyone there to tell them the results of any forensic testing.   :roll:

What I did notice through the fog of Raid I had to use while there, is that they have a lot of opinions that aren't based on anything except their emotions.   They slant the truth or make up stories to support their statements because they know they don't have anything to back up their opinions.  Whatever the monkeys disagree on, there seems to be rational thought involved.  I haven't seen monkeys try to slant the facts to support their theories, even if theories about people or events differ.  That, to me, is one of the things that makes this site different.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 02:39:43 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "jill"
so, I noticed again that the Natalee Behavior section of the wikipedia article is GONE again.

Just thought ya'll might want to know.

 :D



Is this not just WILD!!  We remove the lies and somebody puts them back up again!!

They must monitor it every day.

Perhaps we should, too, to make sure its not put back.


They do!! I added some things last night and they were deleted this morning. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 02:41:12 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
:::stomps on cooties::::

Sorry.  I peeked in at RU to see if the head of the NFI had contacted Julie Renfroe or anyone there to tell them the results of any forensic testing.   :roll:

What I did notice through the fog of Raid I had to use while there, is that they have a lot of opinions that aren't based on anything except their emotions.   They slant the truth or make up stories to support their statements because they know they don't have anything to back up their opinions.  Whatever the monkeys disagree on, there seems to be rational thought involved.  I haven't seen monkeys try to slant the facts to support their theories, even if theories about people or events differ.  That, to me, is one of the things that makes this site different.

I monitor those sites all day and will post if anyone from Aruba posts anything of interest.  Yes, they have actually blamed everything on Beth and Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:42:44 PM
So the concrete might not have even been good and dry and yet the searchers didn't think a thing of it?

 :roll:

I have never heard of such a thing in an investigation.

Just shows what a true farce it really was!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 02:43:25 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I agree with Snoop Dawg that the concrete could have been poured to cover up blood stains, rather than to conceal a body. I can imagine that on some surfaces it would be almost impossible to completely eradicate blood stains.


BINGO


NICE JOB SNOOPY
ROCK ON MONKEYS!
i am at the library---no on make me laugh!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:46:31 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Rob"
Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property.

Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

MORE COMEMENCIA WAS AT THE VAN DER SLOOT HOUSE:

Updated Wed. Jun. 15, 2005 10:37 PM ET

Associated Press

NOORD, Aruba -- Aruban police Wednesday searched the home of a high-ranking Dutch judicial official whose son was with an Alabama honors student the night she disappeared, carrying out plastic garbage bags full of items and towing away two vehicles.


Bah.. Papito also handled the Jogger and the Kalpoe Vehicle..You hear TJ Wards Radio Interview? He thinks they got the wrong car!!!



*******, remember early on there was the rumor that it was Papito the Butterfly who was the real Godfather of one of the Sloot children instead of van der Straaten who might as well have been but wasn't in fact.

Just a rumor but I did hear that.

I lost the link to that Ward radio interview.  If anybody still has it, please post again as I don't think I could ever find it with all the pages we are accumulating at such a rapid speed.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:47:23 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Rob"
Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property.

Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

MORE COMEMENCIA WAS AT THE VAN DER SLOOT HOUSE:

Updated Wed. Jun. 15, 2005 10:37 PM ET

Associated Press

NOORD, Aruba -- Aruban police Wednesday searched the home of a high-ranking Dutch judicial official whose son was with an Alabama honors student the night she disappeared, carrying out plastic garbage bags full of items and towing away two vehicles.


Bah.. Papito also handled the Jogger and the Kalpoe Vehicle..You hear TJ Wards Radio Interview? He thinks they got the wrong car!!!


Ha Ha Ha ... *******, of course I heard it..I linked it. LOL... I know he said that...
So many areas of apparent malfeasance...that's how you know it was not a competent investigation... and we're all still here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 02:48:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
What exactly was Paulus' statement to the police regarding 4 am, McDonalds, Natalee and Joran?

It wasn't a statement to police but a wiretap of PVDS phone in which he spoke of it.  The previously unknown wiretap information was produced at the last PVDS hearing to collect money which was denied, partially due to this wiretap information.


Klaas ... I cannot comprehend why this wiretap evidence did not stand in the way of favorable rulings when Paulus was released from detention ... when the scope of the official search warrant was reduced ... when he was declared no longer a suspect and ... when he was awarded compensation.  Why did the Superior Court rule negatively in regards to Paulus' motion for further compensation?  The wiretap evidence never made any difference in previous ruling which benefited Paulus.

Janet

http://arubanboycott.blogspot.com/2007/04/paulus-van-der-sloots-detainment.html


Because KJ didn't release that information to the Judge at that time.  The judge can only rule by what he is given by the Prosecutors office.


Klaas ... I cannot comprehend why Karin Janssen did not release this wiretap evidence to the judge in each of Paulus' court appearances unless she was part of the coverup.  Also ... it is beyond my understanding why Karin Janssen knowing that the wiretap evidence was in her possession bowed to Paulus' threat of a lawsuit against the prosecutor's office if he did not get a "good conduct" document that was required if he were to qualify as a practicing lawyer.

All along I was giving Karin Janssen the benefit of the doubt that she was presenting the court with all available evidence each time one of the suspects appeared before the judge and ... blaming corrupt judges for the favorable rulings.

Janet


Bon Dia Aruba
01/06/2006


CASE AGAINST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Paul van der Sloot asked the judge to be registered as a lawyer. When making such a petition, the judge asks the Attorney General (AG) of Aruba if they have something against the person being registered as an attorney. The AG bases her advice on data from the “Justitiele Documentatiedienst” (justice documentation service).

It is in the “Justitiele Documentatiedienst” that judge decisions in penal cases (sentence) and prosecutor decisions (sepot? Or conditional sepot?) are registered. The Justitiele Documentatiedienst then gives a so called conduct declaration.

In the case of Mr. Paul van der Sloot, there is a case registered in the Justitiele Documentatiedienst. As it is known, in June 2005, Mr. van der Sloot was detained but there is still no decision from the prosecutor nor from the judge. This made it such that a good conduct document could not be given.

On this basis, Mr. Paul van der Sloot decided to start a case against the Public Prosecutor. Bon Dia’s investigation shows that Mr. van der Sloot made a petition to the court for this case and it was determined that this case will take place on January 11 at 2 in the afternoon.


CASE WILL NOT CONTINUE

However, yesterday the Public Prosecutor notified Mr. van der Sloot for him to drop by their office and come get his good conduct document


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:50:34 PM
Beth even said in one of her more recent interviews (meaning within the last six months) that the entire interior had been changed.  I suppose she was speculating just as we are but it is highly possible especially with all the access to rental cars they had on a tourist island.

So maybe they changed the whole interior or maybe they changed the whole car.  Either one would do the trick.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 02:51:09 PM
Investigation Complete at van der Sloot Home  
 
Last Edited: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
Created: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
 
FOX's Devan Walsh has the latest from Arub  
BIRMINGHAM, Ala (WBRC-TV MyFoxAL.com)  --  Investigators returned to work today in the search for Natalee Holloway. Investigators told FOX6 that they had completed their search of the van der Sloot home and that no human remains were found. FOX's Devon Walsh has more from Aruba...  

Video at Link (http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3090860&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:51:54 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.

Rob,
On one of Dana’s interviews, might have even been last year, Tim said he thought Natalee’s body was in the ocean and is recoverable.  And at that time TES was about $100K short in funds to do the search.
I agree, I doubt Tim and TES are going to do a deep sea search based on a whim.  I think he knows something that’s not been made common knowledge to the general public.


Indy, This is one of those areas that we will not know until we know. I feel safe in saying that if Tim does not find Natalee it will not be for lack of effort or technology. It will only be because she is no longer recoverable or the ocean is so vast and she could have moved over the last two years.. underwater currents are pretty strong and they drive the weather patterns.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:52:03 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
[
Ha Ha Ha ... *******, of course I heard it..I linked it. LOL... I know he said that...
So many areas of apparent malfeasance...that's how you know it was not a competent investigation... and we're all still here.



Please post the link again.  I failed to save it and got busy and then the pages added up too quickly.

Sorry.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: jill on May 02, 2007, 02:53:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "jill"
so, I noticed again that the Natalee Behavior section of the wikipedia article is GONE again.

Just thought ya'll might want to know.

 :D

It's a constant battle.  It just proves what a farce Wiki can be.


I agree.

I cringe when I think that I used to send my daughter to Wiki for school research.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 02:54:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Rob"
Two police officers walked through the Van Der Sloot family's one-story, yellow-beige home, while others guarded the entranceway. A blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep were also towed from the property.

Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

MORE COMEMENCIA WAS AT THE VAN DER SLOOT HOUSE:

Updated Wed. Jun. 15, 2005 10:37 PM ET

Associated Press

NOORD, Aruba -- Aruban police Wednesday searched the home of a high-ranking Dutch judicial official whose son was with an Alabama honors student the night she disappeared, carrying out plastic garbage bags full of items and towing away two vehicles.


Bah.. Papito also handled the Jogger and the Kalpoe Vehicle..You hear TJ Wards Radio Interview? He thinks they got the wrong car!!!



*******, remember early on there was the rumor that it was Papito the Butterfly who was the real Godfather of one of the Sloot children instead of van der Straaten who might as well have been but wasn't in fact.

Just a rumor but I did hear that.

I lost the link to that Ward radio interview.  If anybody still has it, please post again as I don't think I could ever find it with all the pages we are accumulating at such a rapid speed.

.


TJ said he found out Van Der Stratten was the Godfather of Joran..Dave recently said he thinks it is Papito..I talked to this ATA guy in boston and he told me it was all rumors.. Commencia is a good guy..Personal friend..Honest cop..LOL!! :roll: He did agree on one thing said the Van Der Sloots are dirty..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 02:54:08 PM
Hi gang...
Just peeking in  
&
Klaasend you have mail at the old address (I hope)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 02:55:06 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
ROCK ON MONKEYS!
i am at the library---no on make me laugh!!!!!!!


Shhhhh

The Mommy Test

I was out walking with my 4 year old daughter. She picked up something off the ground and started to put it in her mouth. I took the item away from her and I asked her not to do that.

"Why?" my daughter asked.

"Because it's been on the ground, you don't know where it's been,
it's dirty and probably has germs" I replied.

At this point, my daughter looked at me with total admiration and asked,
"Mommy, how do you know all this stuff? You are so smart."

I was thinking quickly. "All moms know this stuff. It's on the Mommy
Test. You have to know it, or they don't let you be a Mommy."

We walked along in silence for 2 or 3 minutes, but she was evidently
pondering this new information.

"OH...I get it!" she beamed, "So if you don't pass the test you have to be
the daddy."

"Exactly!," I replied back with a big smile on my face.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 02:55:12 PM
Hey Ipsigs....good to see u !

ROB------u must have a reeeeaaaallllllllly   big...........computer :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 02:57:08 PM
Anna- regarding the concrete. I can not see anyway around not ripping it up. The dates alone make it suspicious. I realize that construction on Aruba is as slow as a cactus growing festival, and they most likely had it scheduled weeks or months in advance, but the fact remains that it was poured in a relatively short period of time to the disappearance of Natalee...

it has to come up to clear that home completely!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 02:57:11 PM
PUMA..that was funny..i saw a bimper sticker the other day that said "driver carrys no cash----he is married"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 02:57:53 PM
Quote from: "vms"
Investigation Complete at van der Sloot Home  
 
Last Edited: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
Created: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
 
FOX's Devan Walsh has the latest from Arub  
BIRMINGHAM, Ala (WBRC-TV MyFoxAL.com)  --  Investigators returned to work today in the search for Natalee Holloway. Investigators told FOX6 that they had completed their search of the van der Sloot home and that no human remains were found. FOX's Devon Walsh has more from Aruba...  

Video at Link (http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3090860&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1)




So they are not going to dig up the concrete or the driveway.

 :(

All my good feelings from this morning are evaporating.  I should not have gotten on the Roller Coaster.

Bummed out now.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 02:58:11 PM
P>S>  HI old fart...thought i smelled something...lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 02:58:59 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Beth even said in one of her more recent interviews (meaning within the last six months) that the entire interior had been changed.  I suppose she was speculating just as we are but it is highly possible especially with all the access to rental cars they had on a tourist island.

So maybe they changed the whole interior or maybe they changed the whole car.  Either one would do the trick.

.


Possible!  Paulus gets a tip that search warrants are being issued and Deepak takes his car to his pals at AE, getting a very similar loaner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 02:59:49 PM
ANNA--maybe it is just the first place they wanted to rule out...with this case u neverr know.....it is important not to give up hope....for Natalee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:02:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "vms"
Investigation Complete at van der Sloot Home  
 
Last Edited: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
Created: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
 
FOX's Devan Walsh has the latest from Arub  
BIRMINGHAM, Ala (WBRC-TV MyFoxAL.com)  --  Investigators returned to work today in the search for Natalee Holloway. Investigators told FOX6 that they had completed their search of the van der Sloot home and that no human remains were found. FOX's Devon Walsh has more from Aruba...  

Video at Link (http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3090860&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1)




So they are not going to dig up the concrete or the driveway.

 :(

All my good feelings from this morning are evaporating.  I should not have gotten on the Roller Coaster.

Bummed out now.

.


ANNA - I don't know how much the reporters are being told.  I know the prosecutors office said the search at the Sloot home had concluded and no body was found.  I'm sure the KLPD isn't done testing and who knows, maybe they will go back once they get the results from their tests?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 03:02:21 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Anna- regarding the concrete. I can not see anyway around not ripping it up. The dates alone make it suspicious. I realize that construction on Aruba is as slow as a cactus growing festival, and they most likely had it scheduled weeks or months in advance, but the fact remains that it was poured in a relatively short period of time to the disappearance of Natalee...

it has to come up to clear that home completely!


Well, I guess not according to the video VMS just linked.  The search of the Sloot compound is complete and no human remains were found.

They dug up the "garden" apparently but not one word about freshly poured concrete.  Paulus must be laughing his rear off!  He will be saying "Good Luck on that!" some more about finding her.

I am all bummed by this announcement and better take a break before I bring somebody else down.

BBLater when I absorb this latest. . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 03:04:52 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
P>S>  HI old fart...thought i smelled something...lol

FOM
 :shock:   who me   :shock:

I thought you had run out for a quickie  ... of was that someone else


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:05:44 PM
Is there a legal monkey or anyone who can offer info/opinion on the Kalpoes claim that they can't produce documents to support or disprove their case because of Aruban laws?   Seems to me they can't claim they didn't say certain things to ALE if they can't produce all the statements to prove it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 03:06:25 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Rob"
[
Ha Ha Ha ... *******, of course I heard it..I linked it. LOL... I know he said that...
So many areas of apparent malfeasance...that's how you know it was not a competent investigation... and we're all still here.



Please post the link again.  I failed to save it and got busy and then the pages added up too quickly.

Sorry.

.


Anna- here it is.. please use Explorer. This one opens in it's window and won't work with Firefox or the plug ins for IE.
http://tinyurl.com/33o437


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 03:06:49 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[ANNA - I don't know how much the reporters are being told.  I know the prosecutors office said the search at the Sloot home had concluded and no body was found.  I'm sure the KLPD isn't done testing and who knows, maybe they will go back once they get the results from their tests?


I sure hope you are right, Klaas, and something turns up in their testing but after two years, one wonders.

I also wonder if DNA is considered remains.  And they didn't say no trace was found which is encouraging.  There could have been fingerprints.

But still, I don't like the spin that is being put on this and wish the Dutch had their own non-Aruban spokesperson.

I don't trust anybody affiliated with the prosecution or ALE at all.

They have lied to us too many times.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 03:07:29 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Is there a legal monkey or anyone who can offer info/opinion on the Kalpoes claim that they can't produce documents to support or disprove their case because of Aruban laws?   Seems to me they can't claim they didn't say certain things to ALE if they can't produce all the statements to prove it.


That is what Dr. Phil's atty's are saying too.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:07:59 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Is there a legal monkey or anyone who can offer info/opinion on the Kalpoes claim that they can't produce documents to support or disprove their case because of Aruban laws?   Seems to me they can't claim they didn't say certain things to ALE if they can't produce all the statements to prove it.


This was posted by Freebird yesterday:

Kalpoe v. McGraw

The Lawsuit

K2 filed a complaint for damages based on defamation, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, among other things.   The suit's based on K2's claim that McGraw/Skeeters intentionally altered the "Skeeters tape" for the purpose of painting K2 in a bad light.  

They are asking for $800 MILLION in damages.


The Answer

Phil filed an answer responding to the complaint and asserted various affirmative defenses.   An affirmative defense is a defense that is specified by statute in a particular kind of case & it is a defense which has to be specifically set out in pleadings or it is waived.   Affirmative defenses can have the affect of shifting the burden of proof from the defendant (Phil) to the plaintiff (K2).  For example - "truth" is an affirmative defense to a defamation claim.    By raising the defense of "truth" (ie, alleging that the so-called defamatory statements are in fact true and not false) and providing some minimal thresshold of evidence - the burden of proof then shifts to the plaintiff to prove that the statements are false.   Just one example - phil raised several affirmative defenses.

Discovery

Part of any lawsuit is discovery, which is governed by statute.  It is designed to eliminate surprises and promote settlement of any issues or questions of fact which can be settled prior to trial.    Discovery in most jurisdictions includes:  requests for production of documents and tangible things, interrogatories, requests for admission, depositions and deposition on written question.  The most common are requests for production, interrogatories and depositions.   Discovery usually begins fairly soon into a case.

Discovery encompasses not only items which would be admissible under the rules of evidence, but also items which are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.   By way of example - a discovery request might ask for a document or deposition question which would be considered hearsay and inadmissable at trial.    It's still fair game in discovery, however, if it's relevant to the claim or defense - or if it's relative to the amount of damages being requested.   Subject to permitted objections, a party served with requests for production of documents must produce anything over which he has possession or exercises control - e.g., K2 cannot refuse to turn something over just because they do not have possession of it.   If they can compel whoever has possession to give it to them, then they must do that and turn it over.

In this case discovery will be very broad because defamation takes into account reputation.   Because "truth" is an affirmative defense - discovery will also include a huge variety of communications by the plaintiffs to others - essentially anyone they have communicated with at all about any of the issues related to the defamation.


Objections to Discovery


There are only a handful of permitted objections to discovery.  Permitted objections include :

1.  burdensome - the request would create an unreasonable financial or time hardship, basically making compliance impossible.  What is actually considered burdensome is also dependent on the complexity of the suit and the amount of damages being claimed.

2.  irrelevant or beyond the scope - not even reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence, or if the judge has defined the scope of discovery then requests have to stay within those parameters

3.   subject to privilege -  a document or communication is subject to a legally recognized privilege.  e.g. lawyer/client, doctor/patient, husband/wife.

4.  vague/confusing - a party can object and ask that a discovery request be clarified with defined terms or be made more specific if it is unclear


Discovery Served on K2

Phil served K2 with requests for production of documents and interrogatories.  In a nutshell - the requests asked for any document or tangible thing which has anything to do with Natalee, K2's reputations (school, work, etc), the lawsuit itself and any agreements they made about attorneys fees, media transcripts, forensic tests conducted in the criminal case, etc.    This would include the entire police file or as much of it as is in K2's possession or subject to their control, any emails or chats they've had about the lawsuit, the criminal case or Natalee, media transcripts, newspaper and other media publications where K2 are mentioned, employment and school records, income/bank records .. and the list goes on.    Phil asked for 56 categories of documents - it's very extensive.

There is a date by which a party must comply with discovery requests.   If objections are made - the party still must identify whichever documents he has which are responsive to the requests and state specifically which objection applies.

Initially, K2 turned only one document over in response to the discovery requests - a press release from the NFI re: testing on the Skeeter's tape - a two paragraph blurb.   For all other requests, objections were made.   However, most of  the objections were not legall recognizable objections.  K2 objected based on:

1.  right of privacy- there is no general right of privacy and every lawyer knows that; this will not go over well with the judge.

2.  confidential - K2 claim that they cant turn over anything from the police file because of some Aruban procedure which supposedly prohibits a prosecutor from disclosing certain information in an open investigation.   K2 appear to be claiming that because of this law - they dont have to turn over police files that are in their possession or the possession of their attorneys.  This is bogus also because A.  it's not a legally recognized privilege, B. the Aruba law appears to apply to prosecutors and attorneys - it's not a privilege that K2 can claim for themselves.  If K2 have the docs, then obviously the prosecutor turned them over to K2 and K2 will have to turn them over to Phil, and C. as Phil points out, Aruba law doesnt apply to the suit because K2 brought the suit in California, not Aruba.

3.  burdensome/overbroad- when using this objection, a party has to state exactly how they would be burdened- which they did not do.  Even if a request is burdensome, a party still has to comply up to the point of being burdened.   For a crazy example - if a request asks for 3 million docs - that might be burdensome, but the party stilll has to produce the 1 million docs that arent burdensome.  The party cant just refuse to comply entirely.   Also - considering K2 are asking for $800 MILLION in damages and filed a 53 page complaint with many many counts - a judge will not consider a request burdensome unless it is darn near impossible to comply.

4.  vague
- when K2 couldnt come up with another objection, they claimed that a request was too vague to comply.    This is laughable when your read the documents.  One request asked for all documents evidencing "communications" between K2 and someone (forgot who, Joran maybe).   K2 refused to turn any docs over because they claim the term "communications" is vague and undefined.   Everyone knows what a "communication" is, and this one will irritate the judge also.

Phil's Response

Apparently in California, before asking a judge to compel a party to comply with discovery - there has to be an attempt to work it out.   Phil's lawyers wrote a lengthy letter to K2 attorneys and told them exactly what was wrong with their discovery responses.   They gave them an extra week to comply.

K2 then turned over a couple of media reports and information from blogs.   They also submitted a list of documents which are responsive to the requests, but still refused to turn over the actual documents - standing on their objections listed above.    

Phil then filed a Motion to Compel Discovery and set if for hearing May 16.   Phil paintakingly addresses each objection and asks the court to order K2 to comply with the discovery requests.    On May 16 the court will hear argument from Phil and K2 and in all likelihood order K2 to turn over all the documents - there may be some slight limitation, but I doubt that even.   At that point, if K2 still do not turn over the documents then they are in contempt and the court can impose penalties and sanctions - among the penalties, the court could limit evidence K2 can present at trial or the court could actually strike allegations or charges from the complaint.  Worst case, I believe the judge could dismiss the suit altogether.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 03:08:03 PM
repair guy heere gotta run
SeeeeeeeeeYa


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:09:18 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Is there a legal monkey or anyone who can offer info/opinion on the Kalpoes claim that they can't produce documents to support or disprove their case because of Aruban laws?   Seems to me they can't claim they didn't say certain things to ALE if they can't produce all the statements to prove it.


That is what Dr. Phil's atty's are saying too.   :lol:


But I said it in one sentence, not 3 pages!  Proof that I'm not a lawyer.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 03:09:42 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
ROCK ON MONKEYS!
i am at the library---no on make me laugh!!!!!!!


Shhhhh

The Mommy Test

I was out walking with my 4 year old daughter. She picked up something off the ground and started to put it in her mouth. I took the item away from her and I asked her not to do that.

"Why?" my daughter asked.

"Because it's been on the ground, you don't know where it's been,
it's dirty and probably has germs" I replied.

At this point, my daughter looked at me with total admiration and asked,
"Mommy, how do you know all this stuff? You are so smart."

I was thinking quickly. "All moms know this stuff. It's on the Mommy
Test. You have to know it, or they don't let you be a Mommy."

We walked along in silence for 2 or 3 minutes, but she was evidently
pondering this new information.

"OH...I get it!" she beamed, "So if you don't pass the test you have to be
the daddy."

"Exactly!," I replied back with a big smile on my face.


sounds like your daughter is a rocket scientist...she's already figured it all out.. what a cute story. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 03:09:58 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Rob"
[
Ha Ha Ha ... *******, of course I heard it..I linked it. LOL... I know he said that...
So many areas of apparent malfeasance...that's how you know it was not a competent investigation... and we're all still here.



Please post the link again.  I failed to save it and got busy and then the pages added up too quickly.

Sorry.

.


Anna- here it is.. please use Explorer. This one opens in it's window and won't work with Firefox or the plug ins for IE.
http://tinyurl.com/33o437



Thanks, Rob,
Plays fine.  I think I have every player that exists on my computer now.   :roll:

Am listening and hoping it will perk me back up.  I know better than to get my hopes up and did only this morning.

Getting back to reality is painful sometimes but I'm there.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 02, 2007, 03:10:18 PM
Anna

Link for TJWard (from oldfart)  http://tinyurl.com/33o437

I believe it was STom that posted about Papi being the godfather (I remember thinking it was scaredtom and I believe Rob corrected me) :oops: .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Buckeye on May 02, 2007, 03:13:47 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Is there a legal monkey or anyone who can offer info/opinion on the Kalpoes claim that they can't produce documents to support or disprove their case because of Aruban laws?   Seems to me they can't claim they didn't say certain things to ALE if they can't produce all the statements to prove it.


That is what Dr. Phil's atty's are saying too.   :lol:


But I said it in one sentence, not 3 pages!  Proof that I'm not a lawyer.  :lol:


There was also talk that the author of Joran's book quoted PVs and other file info so...if an author was permitted access for a book, certainly the defendents should have access....but you know those "funny" Aruban laws.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 03:16:10 PM
Missing Teen's Family Remain Hopeful

"Some kind of answer as to where Natalee was put."

That's what Ann Reynolds is hoping for; answers as to what happened to her granddaughter Natalee Holloway. (See links below the picture for more stories on Holloway.)

Reynolds explains, “After two years, you expect for them not to find something and then all of a sudden that we have hope that they might have found something."

Dutch police are reviving a case in the search of the teen who vanished during a school trip to the Dutch Caribbean Island. Around 20 Dutch investigators dug up earth outside the home of the police's prime suspect Joran Van Der Sloot.

Reynolds says Natalee's mother, Beth Twitty, while pleased with the latest developments in the case, admits it's not easy watching it all unfold on TV.

She continues, “She said, ‘Mom this has been harder on me than anything that I know of. I kind of had gotten to the point where maybe they might not, but I always had hope.’"

Hope that the mystery of what happened to their loved one finally solved after two years, even though they know they may not find her alive.

Reynolds says, “I don't think that's going to happen. But if we can find anything of hers that she had on that day."

But inside the Reynolds home, you won't have a hard time finding a piece of Natalee with her pictures everywhere.

Her disappearance has admittedly affected each one of them, but they rely on one another to help pull them through in hopes that this two-year nightmare can finally be put to rest.

(http://i13.tinypic.com/4xuw1hv.jpg)
(http://i10.tinypic.com/4q6vntt.jpg)
(http://i15.tinypic.com/6c7gbde.jpg)
(http://i12.tinypic.com/4ue9z4x.jpg)

Video (http://www.todaysthv.com/video/news/player.aspx?aid=44527&bw=)

KTHV Little Rock (http://www.todaysthv.com/news/news.aspx?storyid=45161&provider=top)

Klaas,
If this has already been posted, please delete it...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 03:17:41 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Rob"
Anna- regarding the concrete. I can not see anyway around not ripping it up. The dates alone make it suspicious. I realize that construction on Aruba is as slow as a cactus growing festival, and they most likely had it scheduled weeks or months in advance, but the fact remains that it was poured in a relatively short period of time to the disappearance of Natalee...

it has to come up to clear that home completely!


Well, I guess not according to the video VMS just linked.  The search of the Sloot compound is complete and no human remains were found.

They dug up the "garden" apparently but not one word about freshly poured concrete.  Paulus must be laughing his rear off!  He will be saying "Good Luck on that!" some more about finding her.

I am all bummed by this announcement and better take a break before I bring somebody else down.

BBLater when I absorb this latest. . . .


They may have used Sonar to determine she wasn't there.  

That doesn't mean they didn't find something.  We will not know that right away.  They just need a little something to prove she was there.

The thing we need to remember is - the Dutch Investigators obviously had enough evidence to warrant a search of the property in the first place.  IF they had nothing, they would have never searched.  The pressure is on the VDS's -  

These are professionals.  They aren't done by a long shot


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 03:17:53 PM
Tamikosmom,

I have lost your post at the moment but agree completely with your assessment of the handling of giving Paulus a commendation of good conduct while holding that wiretap information.  I meant to comment on that when you posted and things are moving too fast for me.

OK, so the Sloot supporters contend that is NOT Paulus in the casino video.  That makes it much worse that he may have had contact later.  THey would have been far better off insisting that it was him.  If it wasn't then his contact was in private and later and therefore highly suspect.

How on earth that qualifies for a good conduct report I cannot imagine for his lying alone should have stopped that.

But she just caved and gave it to him so he could become an attorney.

The reason we don't understand their system is that they don't have one.  They are a nation of people and influence and not laws.  We are accustomed to a nation of laws that apply to all.  Theirs are like jello and conform to whatever they want them to.

They are more like a big tribe than a legitimate nation with a government

,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:17:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Is there a legal monkey or anyone who can offer info/opinion on the Kalpoes claim that they can't produce documents to support or disprove their case because of Aruban laws?   Seems to me they can't claim they didn't say certain things to ALE if they can't produce all the statements to prove it.


This was posted by Freebird yesterday:

Kalpoe v. McGraw

The Lawsuit



If the Kalpoe attorneys can list all those statements, then clearly the Kalpoes' US attorneys have those documents and they are no longer something the Aruban Prosecutor can't release as they've been released.  Somehow though, I've found that what seems to make sense to me doesn't always coincide with what a Judge does.   :?  Hopefully, the Judge will order the Kalpoes to produce.  
Also, I read the statement supposedly by NFI and it does not say what Arlene claims.   :shock:  Yes, it came as a complete shock.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 03:18:51 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Anna

Link for TJWard (from oldfart)  http://tinyurl.com/33o437

I believe it was STom that posted about Papi being the godfather (I remember thinking it was scaredtom and I believe Rob corrected me) :oops: .


yep, it was STom. Sorry Buckeye.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:20:15 PM
VMS - thanks for posting, it had not been posted here yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:22:45 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
sounds like your daughter is a rocket scientist...she's already figured it all out.. what a cute story. :D


Not my daughter, but it's a great story.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 03:22:46 PM
Klass----ty for the wealth of info re lawsuit....u r amazing


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 03:24:26 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "vms"
Investigation Complete at van der Sloot Home  
 
Last Edited: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
Created: Wednesday, 02 May 2007, 12:28 PM CDT
 
FOX's Devan Walsh has the latest from Arub  
BIRMINGHAM, Ala (WBRC-TV MyFoxAL.com)  --  Investigators returned to work today in the search for Natalee Holloway. Investigators told FOX6 that they had completed their search of the van der Sloot home and that no human remains were found. FOX's Devon Walsh has more from Aruba...  

Video at Link (http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3090860&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1)




So they are not going to dig up the concrete or the driveway.

 :(

All my good feelings from this morning are evaporating.  I should not have gotten on the Roller Coaster.

Bummed out now.

.


now now now,,, settle down my little dog lover

take a deep breath


all will be fine


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 03:25:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Tamikosmom,

I have lost your post at the moment but agree completely with your assessment of the handling of giving Paulus a commendation of good conduct while holding that wiretap information.  I meant to comment on that when you posted and things are moving too fast for me.

OK, so the Sloot supporters contend that is NOT Paulus in the casino video.  That makes it much worse that he may have had contact later.  THey would have been far better off insisting that it was him.  If it wasn't then his contact was in private and later and therefore highly suspect.

How on earth that qualifies for a good conduct report I cannot imagine for his lying alone should have stopped that.

But she just caved and gave it to him so he could become an attorney.

The reason we don't understand their system is that they don't have one.  They are a nation of people and influence and not laws.  We are accustomed to a nation of laws that apply to all.  Theirs are like jello and conform to whatever they want them to.

They are more like a big tribe than a legitimate nation with a government

,


I say if that's not Paulus on that casino video, he's got bigger problems than we realize... he is alleged to have has two 'contact's with Natalee.... he better hope that is contact one.

if that is not contact 'one', he's looking more likely to have had a sexual assault upon Natalee..
better be careful what you wish for.

if he only had one more other contact with Natalee, it could be alleged that he only helped in an accessory role.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 03:25:34 PM
no human remains DOES NOT MEAN

that they didnt find evidence that she was there



 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 03:25:45 PM
Items produced in Discovery are not public record.  But once they are introduced into evidence in a trial, they become public record.

At that point we could get access to them or shortly thereafter.

And we just happen to have a Major Monkey close by enough to go to the courthouse and get them, too.

Any of that stuff that is introduced in court is then open to the public unless the judge places a gag order on it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:26:13 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Klass----ty for the wealth of info re lawsuit....u r amazing

That information came from poster Freebird.  I have a hunch Freebird is in the legal profession  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 03:26:59 PM
2 times paulus saw her


one time at the casino and one time whne he picked them up

BUT it was not at MCDONALDS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:27:37 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Items produced in Discovery are not public record.  But once they are introduced into evidence in a trial, they become public record.

At that point we could get access to them or shortly thereafter.

And we just happen to have a Major Monkey close by enough to go to the courthouse and get them, too.

Any of that stuff that is introduced in court is then open to the public unless the judge places a gag order on it.

.

Not to mention any documents that can be obtained online.  Yes, I will go to the courthouse if necessary.  It's only about an hours drive  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:27:40 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
The reason we don't understand their system is that they don't have one.  They are a nation of people and influence and not laws.  We are accustomed to a nation of laws that apply to all.  Theirs are like jello and conform to whatever they want them to.

They are more like a big tribe than a legitimate nation with a government

,


That's why we get different answers from different people about things like the 2 year question or evidence being leaked.  I don't think they understand their system.  They don't have much use for it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 03:30:43 PM
Anna you are so right, it is a large tribe with no semblance of a civilized and orderly government. How much crime is driven by the chollar/addicts alone? Any responsible government would eliminate the drugs driving that and go to great lengths to do so, unless of course they benefit fiscally from it.

I think the Dr Phil discovery is going to become pivotal in this case and now perhaps we all will understand better why Beth has said May is a big event. I'm so glad we have supermonkey Klaas ready to roll with it too - hurrah !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:32:32 PM
We know furniture was replaced at the Sloots.  Many in warm climates have tile, not carpet.  Do we know if the Sloots had any carpeting?  I'm thinking there could be residue of blood in tile.   Anna said bleach will destory DNA, so this might not help.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:34:59 PM
National Enquirer - please take with a grain of salt:
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/crime/63397

COPS SEARCH JORAN'S HOME, DIG UP EVIDENCE

Dutch detectives launching a new investigation into the murder of Natalee Holloway believed they would finally find her body when they swooped without warning on the home of the prime suspect, The ENQUIRER has learned.

Tellingly, the massive two-day police operation at the Aruban home of Joran van der Sloot included diggers and cadaver dogs trained to sniff out human remains.

With the second anniversary of Natalee's disappearance looming, the dramatic search ended after 14 hours with cops carting away boxes of evidence - and still pursuing their grim goal.

"The Dutch police team is confident they will find Natalee's remains soon," a source close to the investigation told The ENQUIRER.

Natalee vanished on May 30, 2005 - the last night of a graduation trip for her class from Mountain Brook High School in Alabama - after leaving a bar with 18-year-old Joran and two of his pals.


Published on: 05/02/2007


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:36:40 PM
Quote from: "robots"
2 times paulus saw her


one time at the casino and one time whne he picked them up

BUT it was not at MCDONALDS


If Paulus picked them up, I'd bet that was the third time he saw her.   :x I do think they were at the vds house, although I'm not as convinced as some that he played a part in her demise.  No doubt he's orchestrated as much of the coverup as he could.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: LilPuma on May 02, 2007, 03:40:20 PM
Interesting to note that part of Phil's Discovery asks for information about attorneys fees and documents relating to it.  I'm particularly interested in this, especially after Joey had to control himself when O'Reilly told him that he knew who was paying him to represent the Sloots.  Follow the money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:44:26 PM
Jamie posted my bus at BFN, lol  :lol:  :lol:  I had actually forgotten I made it..ha ha  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/bus4dompigpaulusklaasendscaredmonke.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 03:49:17 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Tamikosmom,

I have lost your post at the moment but agree completely with your assessment of the handling of giving Paulus a commendation of good conduct while holding that wiretap information.  I meant to comment on that when you posted and things are moving too fast for me.

OK, so the Sloot supporters contend that is NOT Paulus in the casino video.  That makes it much worse that he may have had contact later.  THey would have been far better off insisting that it was him.  If it wasn't then his contact was in private and later and therefore highly suspect.

How on earth that qualifies for a good conduct report I cannot imagine for his lying alone should have stopped that.

But she just caved and gave it to him so he could become an attorney.

The reason we don't understand their system is that they don't have one.  They are a nation of people and influence and not laws.  We are accustomed to a nation of laws that apply to all.  Theirs are like jello and conform to whatever they want them to.

They are more like a big tribe than a legitimate nation with a government

,


Anna ... we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

I contend that Dutch law is not the problems ... it is the uttler disregard in the Natalee Holloway case for the provisions of Dutch law that apply to a criminal investigation.  The conflict of interest issue is one aspect .  This investigation is riddled with conflicts of interest and ... if Dutch law was adhered to ... an independent ... outside .... international investigation would have been where it was at from day one.

Then there are the provisions dealing with interrogation ... search warrants ... time frame for bringing witnesses in for questioning ... handling and collecting of potential evidence ... releasing suspects from further questioning ....

Anna ... as Jug Twitty put it as only Jug Twitty could ... "It is like they did not want to find the truth."

Janet


Beth Twitty
[ARUBAN BOYCOTT - Dec. 12/05

MICHELLE: "One of Joran's and PVDS's alibis was that Joran was picked up at the McDonald's. PVDS originally told you the first night you met him that he picked Joran up at 4:00 a.m., but he later gave a statement that he picked Joran up at 11:00 p.m. Do you know if there are security cameras in the McDonald's parking lot to prove this claim?"

BETH: On June 5, we asked officials to check to see if there were security cameras, and to this day, nothing has ever been done. No one has looked into it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 03:49:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jamie posted my bus at BFN, lol  :lol:  :lol:  I had actually forgotten I made it..ha ha  :lol:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/bus4dompigpaulusklaasendscaredmonke.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 03:54:02 PM
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 03:54:55 PM
Easy hadn't seen the blurb from Fox about the investigation at the VDS residence being completed. I emailed it to him and he said he would check with Jossy to see if he has any information.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 03:55:30 PM
Excellent visualization!

We must continue to send positive vibes to the forensic unit.  I am feeling better and think I need to give them more time and not let myself get on the Roller Coaster of emotion that happens from time to time with this.

Like when I see the Grandmother hurt.  Oh, how I loved my own and hate to see a lady in her late years have to do through this!  There are some things a person should not have to bear at that age and this is one of them.  Breaking a heart that old is just unconscionable.  

But they know things they are not telling right now, but just might later on.  Well, not Paulus because too many people would be hurt.  How about the ones already hurt?  They are American and so don't count, have no feelings and he must protect those whom he deems more important.  We shall see.

Should remains be found, I think the fam would be notified first, before the press.  If we hear of one of them going to Aruba that might mean something.

I guess Tim is going to search for the crab trap.  Deep water is very cold almost like a freezer so I am also hopeful about that but let's hope even better that something is found to make his search even unnecessary.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 03:55:48 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??


I just logged on and it works for me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 03:56:33 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "*******"
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??


I just logged on and it works for me.

WTH!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:57:47 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??

Nope, BFN is ok for me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 03:58:31 PM
I'm leaving work a little early. Sshhhhh.... :wink:

Talk to you monkeys later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 03:58:48 PM
******* - try deleting your cookies, etc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 04:03:09 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Anna"
Tamikosmom,

I have lost your post at the moment but agree completely with your assessment of the handling of giving Paulus a commendation of good conduct while holding that wiretap information.  I meant to comment on that when you posted and things are moving too fast for me.

OK, so the Sloot supporters contend that is NOT Paulus in the casino video.  That makes it much worse that he may have had contact later.  THey would have been far better off insisting that it was him.  If it wasn't then his contact was in private and later and therefore highly suspect.

How on earth that qualifies for a good conduct report I cannot imagine for his lying alone should have stopped that.

But she just caved and gave it to him so he could become an attorney.

The reason we don't understand their system is that they don't have one.  They are a nation of people and influence and not laws.  We are accustomed to a nation of laws that apply to all.  Theirs are like jello and conform to whatever they want them to.

They are more like a big tribe than a legitimate nation with a government

,


Anna ... we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

I contend that Dutch law is not the problems ... it is the uttler disregard in the Natalee Holloway case for the provisions of Dutch law that apply to a criminal investigation.  The conflict of interest issue is one aspect .  This investigation is riddled with conflicts of interest and ... if Dutch law was adhered to ... an independent ... outside .... international investigation would have been where it was at from day one.

Then there are the provisions dealing with interrogation ... search warrants ... time frame for bringing witnesses in for questioning ... handling and collecting of potential evidence ... releasing suspects from further questioning ....

Anna ... as Jug Twitty put it as only Jug Twitty could ... "It is like they did not want to find the truth."

Janet


Beth Twitty
[ARUBAN BOYCOTT - Dec. 12/05

MICHELLE: "One of Joran's and PVDS's alibis was that Joran was picked up at the McDonald's. PVDS originally told you the first night you met him that he picked Joran up at 4:00 a.m., but he later gave a statement that he picked Joran up at 11:00 p.m. Do you know if there are security cameras in the McDonald's parking lot to prove this claim?"

BETH: On June 5, we asked officials to check to see if there were security cameras, and to this day, nothing has ever been done. No one has looked into it.



Tamikos,

No, I am in complete agreement with you but must have just said it wrong.

It is not the Dutch law that is the problem but the way in which Aruba applies it and creates its own "policies" to suit the occasion.

If a law doesn't suit what their agenda is, they just ignore it or change it.  Example is the law on a person who disappears being considered to have been kidnapped.  Another is an adult who disappears without money or transportation, etc. qualifies as an emergency and yet they told Dave to go to a bar and she would show up.

I just must not have expressed myself well.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 04:04:43 PM
Quote from: "robots"
no human remains DOES NOT MEAN

that they didnt find evidence that she was there



 8)


Things like fingerprints count as do articles of clothing, drivers license, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 04:05:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??

Nope, BFN is ok for me


They said my Username doesn't exist and I can't log in.  I emailed but didn't hear back yet.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 04:06:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Klass----ty for the wealth of info re lawsuit....u r amazing

That information came from poster Freebird.  I have a hunch Freebird is in the legal profession  :wink:



And well informed on the Natalee Holloway case too. Which makes it all that much better.:wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 04:07:38 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??

Nope, BFN is ok for me


They said my Username doesn't exist and I can't log in.  I emailed but didn't hear back yet.

.


Somethin weird here..Cant get in BFN at all..Says IE cant display the webpage..And the nationenquirer site is down due to construction.. :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 04:08:05 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
no human remains DOES NOT MEAN

that they didnt find evidence that she was there



 8)


Things like fingerprints count as do articles of clothing, drivers license, etc.


STAY off the roller coaster  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 04:09:09 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Anna"
Tamikosmom,

I have lost your post at the moment but agree completely with your assessment of the handling of giving Paulus a commendation of good conduct while holding that wiretap information.  I meant to comment on that when you posted and things are moving too fast for me.

OK, so the Sloot supporters contend that is NOT Paulus in the casino video.  That makes it much worse that he may have had contact later.  THey would have been far better off insisting that it was him.  If it wasn't then his contact was in private and later and therefore highly suspect.

How on earth that qualifies for a good conduct report I cannot imagine for his lying alone should have stopped that.

But she just caved and gave it to him so he could become an attorney.

The reason we don't understand their system is that they don't have one.  They are a nation of people and influence and not laws.  We are accustomed to a nation of laws that apply to all.  Theirs are like jello and conform to whatever they want them to.

They are more like a big tribe than a legitimate nation with a government

,


Anna ... we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

I contend that Dutch law is not the problems ... it is the uttler disregard in the Natalee Holloway case for the provisions of Dutch law that apply to a criminal investigation.  The conflict of interest issue is one aspect .  This investigation is riddled with conflicts of interest and ... if Dutch law was adhered to ... an independent ... outside .... international investigation would have been where it was at from day one.

Then there are the provisions dealing with interrogation ... search warrants ... time frame for bringing witnesses in for questioning ... handling and collecting of potential evidence ... releasing suspects from further questioning ....

Anna ... as Jug Twitty put it as only Jug Twitty could ... "It is like they did not want to find the truth."

Janet


Beth Twitty
[ARUBAN BOYCOTT - Dec. 12/05

MICHELLE: "One of Joran's and PVDS's alibis was that Joran was picked up at the McDonald's. PVDS originally told you the first night you met him that he picked Joran up at 4:00 a.m., but he later gave a statement that he picked Joran up at 11:00 p.m. Do you know if there are security cameras in the McDonald's parking lot to prove this claim?"

BETH: On June 5, we asked officials to check to see if there were security cameras, and to this day, nothing has ever been done. No one has looked into it.



Tamikos,

No, I am in complete agreement with you but must have just said it wrong.

It is not the Dutch law that is the problem but the way in which Aruba applies it and creates its own "policies" to suit the occasion.

If a law doesn't suit what their agenda is, they just ignore it or change it.  Example is the law on a person who disappears being considered to have been kidnapped.  Another is an adult who disappears without money or transportation, etc. qualifies as an emergency and yet they told Dave to go to a bar and she would show up.

I just must not have expressed myself well.

.


I may have scan over your post too quickly and ... misunderstood.

Have a good day Anna ... off to lunch with a friend.

Janet

1:00 PM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 04:10:25 PM
blood
vomit
PICTURES of her at the house on a cell phone
witness with corroboration
etc
etc
etc
etc
etc


all will do just fine
 8)

see ya PAULUS




in prison that is


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 04:10:26 PM
Quote from: "*******"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "*******"
Dang..I cant get into BFN or see that enquirer interview..Is BFN down??

Nope, BFN is ok for me


They said my Username doesn't exist and I can't log in.  I emailed but didn't hear back yet.

.


Somethin weird here..Cant get in BFN at all..Says IE cant display the webpage..And the nationenquirer site is down due to construction.. :evil:

I think it's a problem on your end.  You may need to delete your cookies, could be something as simple as that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 04:12:05 PM
No I deleted all the cookies..etc..Now I am gonna try firefox..This is aggrivating!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 04:15:10 PM
Quote from: "*******"
No I deleted all the cookies..etc..Now I am gonna try firefox..This is aggrivating!!

Could be an ISP problem too.  I can get into both BFN and the NE site with no problems.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 04:17:23 PM
Quote from: "*******"
No I deleted all the cookies..etc..Now I am gonna try firefox..This is aggrivating!!


I got an email the other day with a link and when I clicked on it and tried to log in, it said no such user.

Yet they sent me the email so how did they do that if I am not registered.  I emailed for help so we shall see.  Don't understand if I don't exist in the member list how I got an email from them.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 04:20:18 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "*******"
No I deleted all the cookies..etc..Now I am gonna try firefox..This is aggrivating!!


I got an email the other day with a link and when I clicked on it and tried to log in, it said no such user.

Yet they sent me the email so how did they do that if I am not registered.  I emailed for help so we shall see.  Don't understand if I don't exist in the member list how I got an email from them.

.


I will have to call verizon..This is messed up..When I get to BFN I will take care of you anna..Right now I am really pissed off!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 04:38:39 PM
Okay--just watched the newsclip posted (Fox/Birmingham, I think)

The reporter couldn't get anyone from the Aruban Prosecutor's Office on camera to talk--

good sign/bad sign/no sign?

What do you think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 04:44:15 PM
Klass, do you remember the list of young people that died?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: the big hammer on May 02, 2007, 04:47:26 PM
Failure to Prosecute Kalpoe Perjury

Anna writes: It is not the Dutch law that is the problem but the way in which Aruba applies it and creates its own "policies" to suit the occasion.  If a law doesn't suit what their agenda is, they just ignore it or change it.

Yes.

Each Kalpoe brother, individually, attested to and signed two INTENTIONALLY FALSE witness statements under advice of competent counsel.

Dated May 31, 2005, and listed on pages 70 & 73 of Dr Phil discovery requests.

Description: statement of SS Kalpoe as a witness
Description: statement of SS Kalpoe as a witness and indication of an area
Description: statement of DS Kalpoe as a witness
Description: statement of DS Kalpoe as a witness and indication of an area

Intentionally false witness testimony is a crime: Perjury.  It is against the law to "intentionally" lie as a witness (different than "suspect").  

Perjury, perjury leading to false arrest and imprisonment, obstruction of justice, contempt of court.

Yep, this whole case is just one big mystery, isn't it?  Sure seems that way when even the obvious secondary crimes are ignored.  Secondary crimes for which there is actual evidence: the PV's -- the 5/31/05 Kalpoe witness statements themselves -- are EVIDENCE of perjury.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kimmy53 on May 02, 2007, 04:48:26 PM
Quote from: "JusticeforNatalee"
Okay--just watched the newsclip posted (Fox/Birmingham, I think)

The reporter couldn't get anyone from the Aruban Prosecutor's Office on camera to talk--

good sign/bad sign/no sign?

What do you think?


JFN - I am taking it as a good sign.  I HOPE the Dutch investigators do keep close lipped about what is going on.  I take this as they are actually SERIOUS about what they are doing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 04:48:59 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I am sorry to be so upfront about it...No offense, just asking for people to be a little more respectful...Sometimes, when we intend to slam someone, we dont know how many people that are our friends that are sitting on the other end of the screen going, "WTF"??

Yes..I have two kiddos by two different dads..So, that is my point...we never know who we may offend.....

I consider them both blessings from God..Both have unique talents, etc....
I am not a one to condone murder, cover it up, associate with those who are..and if I am not mistaken, Beth Twitty has two different fathers for her kids...At least the young one....I highly respect her..

So, lets lay that to rest, shall we?

<sorry..Nikki cannot forget her prior mod status..lol>


 :smt039 I have 2 kids with different fathers with good reason....
 Thanks Nikki


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 04:50:41 PM
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
Any comments can be made to me directly..nikkibnurse@aol.com...same AIM addy...
Other than that, Lets drop this .....


Oops, hadn't read this far yet.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 04:59:30 PM
NO talking is GOOD

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 05:00:49 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Klass, do you remember the list of young people that died?

Rob - I remember it but didn't save the list.  I think it was posted on the front page of SM, maybe by Grande.  I can check.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:03:44 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/golfmonkey.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:04:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Klass, do you remember the list of young people that died?

Rob - I remember it but didn't save the list.  I think it was posted on the front page of SM, maybe by Grande.  I can check.


I don't need it, I just needed to know that you remembered it..

I have a suspicion.. wanna hear it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 05:05:06 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Klass, do you remember the list of young people that died?

Rob - I remember it but didn't save the list.  I think it was posted on the front page of SM, maybe by Grande.  I can check.


ROB

Grande Says:


SOURCE: MEMETOMORI FUNERAL HOME - ARUBA

EDMOND FERMIN WERLEMAN DIED JUNE 4, 2005 - AGE 35

KERWIN ANTHONY ORVILLE GOIJLA DIED JUNE 4, 2005 - AGE 17

GISELA SULAIKA LOEFSTOP DIED JUNE 15, 2005 - AGE 30

SAUL ARNOLD RAS DIED JUNE 28, 2005 - AGE 29

JASON EUGENE TIN SOENG WONG DIED JULY 10, 2005 - AGE 19

FRANCIS JAMIE NEMENCIO RASMIJN DIED JULY 20, 2005 - AGE 22

ALBERT RICHARD MARQUEZ BUSTAMANTE DIED AUGUST 25, 2005 - AGE 26

ANGELO SATURNINO GERLY DIED SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 - AGE 30

MOISES ALBERTO ROMERO GASIABURU (SP?) DIED OCTOBER 19, 2005 - AGE 34

LYSANDRA ZAHAYRA THIEL DIED NOVEMBER 1, 2005 - AGE 32

ARCADIO SABINO AMADO ROSINA DIED NOVEMBER, 19 2005 - AGE 21

JOSE FERNANDO SANCHEZ DIED NOVEMBER 26, 2005 - AGE 23

SHAILESKOEMAR BHAWEN DIED DECEMBER 25, 2005 - AGE 23

MICHALANGELO GIOVANNI CROES DIED DECEMBER 31, 2005 - AGE 33

MICHELL ANDRE HAGE ALSO DIED DECEMBER 31, 2005 - AGE 33

THINGS THAT MAKE YOU SAY HMMM…….

I AM IN THE PROCESS OF SOURCING MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE DETAILS OF THESE INDIVIDUALS SUDDEN DEATHS.

I FIND IT QUITE DISTURBING MYSELF, CONSIDERING IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT THERE IS LITTLE CRIME ON ARUBA. HOW DID THESE 15! INDIVIDUALS ALL UNDER THE AGE OF 35 ALL COME TO SUDDEN DEATHS SHORTLY THERE AFTER THE INITIAL SURGE OF ATTENTION TO NATALEE’S CASE? MORE IMPORTANTLY PERHAPS IS WHY?
Grande.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 05:05:30 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Klass, do you remember the list of young people that died?

Rob - I remember it but didn't save the list.  I think it was posted on the front page of SM, maybe by Grande.  I can check.


I don't need it, I just needed to know that you remembered it..

I have a suspicion.. wanna hear it?

Sure


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 05:09:25 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.

Rob,
On one of Dana’s interviews, might have even been last year, Tim said he thought Natalee’s body was in the ocean and is recoverable.  And at that time TES was about $100K short in funds to do the search.
I agree, I doubt Tim and TES are going to do a deep sea search based on a whim.  I think he knows something that’s not been made common knowledge to the general public.


Indy, This is one of those areas that we will not know until we know. I feel safe in saying that if Tim does not find Natalee it will not be for lack of effort or technology. It will only be because she is no longer recoverable or the ocean is so vast and she could have moved over the last two years.. underwater currents are pretty strong and they drive the weather patterns.

You know, trying to guess what these animals did with Natalee is disgusting and repulsive.  Just look at the options we are considering, buried under concrete, crammed in a fishtrap and dumped in the ocean, cremated.  The VanDerSloots aren’t even worthy of being called animals.  They’re just a waste of life.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 05:10:08 PM
If Julia RenHO is so concerned about the thousands of dollars being spent on searching for justice for Natalee and her family, I have an idea that might help,

2 Bullets – I’ll buy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 05:10:37 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nikkibnurse"
I think I remember reading that TES is going back out in june...Can anyone tell me why June and not now? Just curious if there is a reason, other than them being incredibly busy, for them to wait......

I imagine it has something to do with getting everything ready.  It's a deep water search, so they have to have the ship and the equipment.


with the amount of missing people in the States, I doubt Tim is going to Aruba based on a whim... I hope he finds Natalee.

Rob,
On one of Dana’s interviews, might have even been last year, Tim said he thought Natalee’s body was in the ocean and is recoverable.  And at that time TES was about $100K short in funds to do the search.
I agree, I doubt Tim and TES are going to do a deep sea search based on a whim.  I think he knows something that’s not been made common knowledge to the general public.


Indy, This is one of those areas that we will not know until we know. I feel safe in saying that if Tim does not find Natalee it will not be for lack of effort or technology. It will only be because she is no longer recoverable or the ocean is so vast and she could have moved over the last two years.. underwater currents are pretty strong and they drive the weather patterns.

You know, trying to guess what these animals did with Natalee is disgusting and repulsive.  Just look at the options we are considering, buried under concrete, crammed in a fishtrap and dumped in the ocean, cremated.  The VanDerSloots aren’t even worthy of being called animals.  They’re just a waste of life.

I agree Indy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 05:11:37 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
If Julia RenHO is so concerned about the thousands of dollars being spent on searching for justice for Natalee and her family, I have an idea that might help,

2 Bullets – I’ll buy!

We think too much alike.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 05:12:58 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
If Julia RenHO is so concerned about the thousands of dollars being spent on searching for justice for Natalee and her family, I have an idea that might help,

2 Bullets – I’ll buy!

We think too much alike.

 :lol:  Yea I know, I've said that in the past - kinda scarey isn't it  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on May 02, 2007, 05:15:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
VMS - thanks for posting, it had not been posted here yet.


 :)  and  :cry: .......ty 4 posting. God, ya know we all want answers.....I hope the next few weeks will give peace to family and friends and to all of us.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 05:16:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"


It is not the Dutch law that is the problem but the way in which Aruba applies it and creates its own "policies" to suit the occasion.

If a law doesn't suit what their agenda is, they just ignore it or change it.  Example is the law on a person who disappears being considered to have been kidnapped.  Another is an adult who disappears without money or transportation, etc. qualifies as an emergency and yet they told Dave to go to a bar and she would show up.

I just must not have expressed myself well.

.



That certainly is the case in Aruba. They ignored laws and used them to the advantage of the Van der Sloots and Kalpoes consistently throughout the investigation.

The only time we have seen the winds change was in Paulus award damages being reversed. Ironically, this was after many resignations/retirements in the police department, a new infusion of judges to Aruba, and the takeover of the case by the Dutch. Let's hope this means something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 05:19:47 PM
Thought this was some good information to acquaint ourselves more with the KLPD. This is an amalgam from several sources. Didn't know the NRI produces ‘Opsporing Verzocht’.
 
The Dutch police consists of 25 regional police forces and the National Police Services Agency (KLPD).

 Each of the Netherlands' 25 police regions is headed by a regional police board, consisting of mayors and a chief public prosecutor. The KLPD is headed by the Minister of the Interior and Kingdom Relations. He is responsible (with the Minister of Justice) for the overall quality of policing in the Netherlands. He also heads each of the regional police forces 'at arm's length' - meaning that he limits his interventions in principle to what is strictly necessary. The KLPD carries out national and specialist police tasks. It collects, files, processes, manages, analyses and distributes information, and carries out other support tasks. It guards the Royal Family and other important persons. And it procures police weaponry, uniforms, and other equipment.


Korps landelijke politiediensten- KLPD
 
Provides twelve operational services, including:

National Criminal Investigation Service- The National Criminal Investigation Service (Dienst Nationale Recherche, DNR) has a staff of approximately 800 employees and a number of units located around the Netherlands. It investigates organized and other serious crime extending across regional or national boundaries. The service pays particular attention to preventive measures based on intelligence gathering, investigation and the provision of advice.

National Criminal Intelligence Service- The National Criminal Intelligence Service (Dienst Nationale Recherche Informatie, NRI) supplies criminal intelligence and expertise to the police forces. By maintaining databases containing data on crimes, criminal modes of operation and other information, the NRI helps to provide information on organized crime and serious forms of supra-regional crime. The NRI has several regional intelligence branch offices and criminal intelligence information desks which support the regional forces and core teams. The NRI develops new criminal investigation technologies and supports investigative teams by providing advice and expertise. Edison (the image storage system for firearms and forged documents) was developed by the NRI. It also specializes in fingerprint identification. Finally, the NRI is responsible for production of the weekly TV crime-watch program ‘Opsporing Verzocht’.


International Police Cooperation Service- The International Police Cooperation Service (Dienst Internationale Politiesamenwerking) is responsible for cooperation with foreign criminal investigation agencies playing a major role in tackling serious cross-border crime. It is contacted by Dutch and foreign police forces for information on foreign and Dutch investigations respectively. The service manages the Dutch branches of Interpol, Europol and the Schengen Information System (SIS); at national level, the Sirene office of the SIS; the KLPD’s liaison officers abroad and foreign liaison officers in the Netherlands.

Specialist Investigation Applications Service- The Specialist Investigation Applications Service ensures that the technological and tactical products, services and equipment used to combat organized crime are reliable and professional. For this purpose it devises innovative ways in which ultramodern technology can be used in police investigations.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:21:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Klass, do you remember the list of young people that died?

Rob - I remember it but didn't save the list.  I think it was posted on the front page of SM, maybe by Grande.  I can check.


I don't need it, I just needed to know that you remembered it..

I have a suspicion.. wanna hear it?

Sure


NATALEE HOLLOWAY MISSING SINCE 5-30-5-31-2005 -  AGE 18

JALITZA MARIE WEVER DIED JUNE 2, 2005 - AGE 33

EDMOND FERMIN WERLEMAN DIED JUNE 4, 2005 - AGE 35

KERWIN ANTHONY ORVILLE GOIJLA DIED JUNE 4, 2005 - AGE 17


JALITZA MARIE WEVER DIED JUNE 5 2005 AGE 33

GISELA SULAIKA LOEFSTOP DIED JUNE 15, 2005 - AGE 30

SAUL ARNOLD RAS DIED JUNE 28, 2005 - AGE 29

JASON EUGENE TIN SOENG WONG DIED JULY 10, 2005 - AGE 19

FRANCIS JAMIE NEMENCIO RASMIJN DIED JULY 20, 2005 - AGE 22

ALBERT RICHARD MARQUEZ BUSTAMANTE DIED AUGUST 25, 2005 - AGE 26


OK, there are the ones I'm suspicious of... I think there was some real bad MDMA going around and it hit a bunch of people off guard and before Aruba knew what hit it, they had a bunch of dead kids and one that didn't take it on her own.

Do you remember when I made a post about the X from Holland and Belgium? I said that stuff is sometimes lethal. I think right here is the evidence that 'something bad happened' and they know it. They even know exactly what drug was involved. This is why they were looking at Lorenzo. It has to be. His nickname is Xtacy. He has the raves, he is a known hell raiser. He has a connection to this case I believe, and a real one.

He might just be someone involved with the X trade and he supplies others... among which could be Steve Croes and / or GVC.

This is the 'something bad happened'. IMO... and Joran and the rape crew didn't have someone OD on X before...so enter Paulus and the cover-up of  the bad drugs going around and the fact they there are some dead kids and last but not least, they crimes against Natalee, which would expose a good deal of what was going on. And if you have some kids from prominent families involved, like we all suspect, it's not a stretch of the imagination to get from A to B.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:22:31 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"

You know, trying to guess what these animals did with Natalee is disgusting and repulsive.  Just look at the options we are considering, buried under concrete, crammed in a fishtrap and dumped in the ocean, cremated.  The VanDerSloots aren’t even worthy of being called animals.  They’re just a waste of life.


yep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 05:24:12 PM
Rob - what is MDMA? I mean, I know it's a drug, but what kind?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:27:43 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Rob - what is MDMA? I mean, I know it's a drug, but what kind?


Ecstacy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 05:28:01 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
If Julia RenHO is so concerned about the thousands of dollars being spent on searching for justice for Natalee and her family, I have an idea that might help,

2 Bullets – I’ll buy!

We think too much alike.

 :lol:  Yea I know, I've said that in the past - kinda scarey isn't it  :lol:

Only for the people we talk about :lol:

I have no tolorence for people like the Sloots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 02, 2007, 05:28:11 PM
IT IS ECTASY OR X.It can be lethal and is an aphetimine


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 05:29:20 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Rob - what is MDMA? I mean, I know it's a drug, but what kind?


Ecstacy


Thanks. I guess it's obvious I'm old, or I would have know that.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:29:48 PM
JALITZA MARIE WEVER DIED JUNE 2, 2005 - AGE 33

She did die on the second. I put her and then double checked and didn't remove it before hitting submit. sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 05:30:57 PM
ROB - you're trying to get Lala's out of lurking mode with Shango posts aren't you? :lol:

What you say is entirely possible.


Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 8:11 pm
One straight path
to the house of Rave,
while of gold bricks
the road is not paved,
answers mysterious lie within
magical letters which spell sin
XTC DNA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:39:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
ROB - you're trying to get Lala's out of lurking mode with Shango posts aren't you? :lol:

What you say is entirely possible.


See when they ship that stuff, it can be a whole lab like we saw a few months ago in the container.. or it can be hidden behind mirrors or in children's clothes... almost anywhere...the point is they don't ship small amounts from Holland or Belgium... they generally do an ALL or NOTHING kind of thing...

It doesn't pay to ship a small amount.. and the profit is not high... that is why the ship as much as humanly possible. When you have a large supply hanging around, you got to get rid of it somehow.

So, once it arrives, it does take awhile before it is all consumed. It could take weeks or months.. and there could be some that bought it and put it in a bottle to use at a later time and didn't take it for a month or two after the purchase.

We had a bunch of people dying here from heroin and it was laced with fentanyl. So I think that is most likely what killed the majority of those young people... I'm sure there was a car accident or too also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 05:42:44 PM
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 05:43:53 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".

Thanks Spock!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 05:48:09 PM
Link to just one funeral home/mortuary for the month of June.

http://www.mementomori.net/june05.html

I have always thought this was a very high number and lots of people have reacted very negatively when one would ask why so many young people were dying.

Tourists do have a right to know something like that for it could be from TB or something contagious.  But have been told several times or had it said that these people have nothing to do with Natalee and are none of our business.

I tend to think otherwise if a place is trying to lure tourists.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 05:48:39 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Failure to Prosecute Kalpoe Perjury

Anna writes: It is not the Dutch law that is the problem but the way in which Aruba applies it and creates its own "policies" to suit the occasion.  If a law doesn't suit what their agenda is, they just ignore it or change it.

Yes.

Each Kalpoe brother, individually, attested to and signed two INTENTIONALLY FALSE witness statements under advice of competent counsel.

Dated May 31, 2005, and listed on pages 70 & 73 of Dr Phil discovery requests.

Description: statement of SS Kalpoe as a witness
Description: statement of SS Kalpoe as a witness and indication of an area
Description: statement of DS Kalpoe as a witness
Description: statement of DS Kalpoe as a witness and indication of an area

Intentionally false witness testimony is a crime: Perjury.  It is against the law to "intentionally" lie as a witness (different than "suspect").  

Perjury, perjury leading to false arrest and imprisonment, obstruction of justice, contempt of court.

Yep, this whole case is just one big mystery, isn't it?  Sure seems that way when even the obvious secondary crimes are ignored.  Secondary crimes for which there is actual evidence: the PV's -- the 5/31/05 Kalpoe witness statements themselves -- are EVIDENCE of perjury.

.



I think their mother sums it up best:

Nadira: Come on, we all lie. We all lie. As big people. I know that I lie sometimes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 05:48:53 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


thank you Spock

"mess up the investigation"

LOAD ALERT         LOAD ALERT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 05:49:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".

Thanks Spock!


And later a similar comment:

"Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney."

It makes no sense to me, that Deepak would ever make statements in this direction in the first place, unless he "slipped up".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 05:50:57 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".

Thanks Spock!


And later a similar comment:

"Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney."

It makes no sense to me, that Deepak would ever make statements in this direction in the first place, unless he "slipped up".


Then he wants to know if a crime was committed  :roll:   Let's see...taking sexual advantage of a girl who is barely concious...what is that called?  RAPE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 05:51:46 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".

Thanks Spock!


And later a similar comment:

"Even though this never happened, about the girl putting her hands in/down my pants, I would like to know what kind of crime this is. I am again saying this never happened, but it is just my question to the district attorney."

It makes no sense to me, that Deepak would ever make statements in this direction in the first place, unless he "slipped up".


Spock, if he had no involvement, he might have ask what is the penalty for robbing the Diamonds International.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 05:52:16 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


thank you Spock

"mess up the investigation"

LOAD ALERT         LOAD ALERT




Now this is supposed to be part of Deepak's alibi being on the computer, etc. chatting away, etc. talking to Joran while Joran walked home.

Why would he want to mess up an investigation and how would he know that there was even going to be an investigation???

Investigation of what, Deepak!

"The Girl" wasn't yet even missing, was she?

Why was Deepak laying down an alibi so soon?  

 :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 05:58:00 PM
There is more, from Deepak's June 13 statement:

Quote
To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


Chatting online 2:40 am May 30th, 2005.

Back to his June 29 statement:

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 05:58:27 PM
No, the kicker is that Deepak was already thinking of investigations.

Wasn't this supposed to have been said the very night Natalee disappeared?

Why did he think he needed to mess up and investigation?  Investigation of what?  They left her on the beach in OK condition, right?  Why would he think there was going to be an investigation?

That has been a big red flag throughout this non-investigation.  Why did the Sloots and Kalpoes never think Natalee would return?
No corpse, no case and all the rest is just geared toward covering up a murder and not thinking that "the girl" would pop up alive and well just any minute.

They went into cover up too fast not to know they needed to cover up for a very serious crime.

Normal response would be that she's got to be here somewhere, let's find her not messing up investigations and no body no case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 05:59:02 PM
That's the dumbest thing i have ever heard. Deepak is a moron.

And he outwitted ALE...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 06:01:01 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
There is more, from Deepak's June 13 statement:

Quote
To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


Chatting online 2:40 am May 30th, 2005.

Back to his June 29 statement:

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Natalee disappeared the night of May 29-30, right?

This is the same night she disappeared or do I have the date wrong and it is the next night.  Looks like about the time he is saying he got home from the C&C misadventure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 06:04:03 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
There is more, from Deepak's June 13 statement:

Quote
To your question as to who John Charles CROES is, where he lives and how often I have chatted to him on "MSN", I can say the following.
The afore mentioned John lives with his whole family in Miami. I have known him since school. We were together at the MAVO. On Monday Mai 30th 2005 I had chatted with John from about 02:40 to 03:30 hours. We didn't chat continually. From time to time I went and watched some TV. But I am sure that he was online during the time-frame I just mentioned above here.


Chatting online 2:40 am May 30th, 2005.

Back to his June 29 statement:

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


So about 2 hours after leaving C&C DK is online with a friend who he admitted telling he had some sexual contact


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 06:07:26 PM
Spock:

So about 2 hours after leaving C&C DK is online with a friend who he admitted telling he had some sexual contact

Anna:

And worse yet, he already knows there is going to be an investigation to mess up.

How did he know something was going to be investigated?

What happened that made him already be thinking about investigations?

This is an admission of a crime.

And almost in real time.  He should not have had any clue about investigations for Natalee wasn't even missing yet.  He had to know about a crime that was going to be investigated and he knew it the night she disappeared.  And admitted it in this statement.

So how'd he know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 06:09:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Spock:

So about 2 hours after leaving C&C DK is online with a friend who he admitted telling he had some sexual contact

Anna:

And worse yet, he already knows there is going to be an investigation to mess up.

How did he know something was going to be investigated?

What happened that made him already be thinking about investigations?

This is an admission of a crime.

And almost in real time.  He should not have had any clue about investigations for Natalee wasn't even missing yet.  He had to know about a crime that was going to be investigated and he knew it the night she disappeared.  And admitted it in this statement.

So how'd he know?


how does he even continue to get away with it, he should be behind bars but they just ignore this fact


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 06:12:35 PM
Blah,
That is what makes me want to pull out my own hair about this whole thing.  They say the stupidest things like that, totally self incriminating in two ways and ALE then instead of following up and asking the obvious, they apparently just blithely go on to something totally irrelevant.

Oh, look, a kitty!  Want some Frosted Flakes?

Deepak isn't the only stupid one.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 06:15:28 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Blah,
That is what makes me want to pull out my own hair about this whole thing.  They say the stupidest things like that, totally self incriminating in two ways and ALE then instead of following up and asking the obvious, they apparently just blithely go on to something totally irrelevant.

Oh, look, a kitty!  Want some Frosted Flakes?

Deepak isn't the only stupid one.

.


so does this "new and improved" investigation have a tip line or anything?  We need to make sure they check into this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 06:16:35 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Spock ... I have a copy of Deepak's emails.

Klaas ... the emails would make for an extremely long post.  Maybe I should create a separate thread or ... post them in an existing thread.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 06:17:40 PM
do we know what hotel the investigators are staying at?  We can just send a message to the hotel front desk for "The Dutch Investigators" and hopefully they get it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 06:20:42 PM
Quote from: "blah"
do we know what hotel the investigators are staying at?  We can just send a message to the hotel front desk for "The Dutch Investigators" and hopefully they get it


I'll bet Jossy knows, since he's had a reporter covering their activities.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 06:21:15 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Spock ... I have a copy of Deepak's emails.

Klaas ... the emails would make for an extremely long post.  Maybe I should create a separate thread or ... post them in an existing thread.

Janet

Klaas has the emails in the important case document thread:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=383


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: blah on May 02, 2007, 06:22:06 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
do we know what hotel the investigators are staying at?  We can just send a message to the hotel front desk for "The Dutch Investigators" and hopefully they get it


I'll bet Jossy knows, since he's had a reporter covering their activities.


We somehow need to get confirmation that investigators know about this because it is huge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 06:25:22 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
do we know what hotel the investigators are staying at?  We can just send a message to the hotel front desk for "The Dutch Investigators" and hopefully they get it


I'll bet Jossy knows, since he's had a reporter covering their activities.


We somehow need to get confirmation that investigators know about this because it is huge.


I emailed Easy to see if he could find out from Jossy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 06:25:26 PM
Well, they have the statements and can read and it's right there in front on them.

Surely they would notice a little thing like this.

 :roll:

We only have a tiny percentage of the statements and yet we have nailed them fifty ways to Sunday admitting stuff.

And yet the claim is there is no evidence.

If only forensic evidence counts, why in heck did they take all these statements in the first place if they are not admissible in court and count for nothing?

Why did they pass up the opportunity to collect forensics and go for these statements and surveillance instead if it means nothing?  Why even take them?

Going to go do more work to blow off steam.  Those pups better watch out, lol!  They may get the scrubbing of their lives.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 06:26:37 PM
Oh, and I meant to say that if Jossy does know where the investigators are staying and tells Easy, I'll let Klaas know via email.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 06:27:07 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Spock ... I have a copy of Deepak's emails.

Klaas ... the emails would make for an extremely long post.  Maybe I should create a separate thread or ... post them in an existing thread.

Janet


Klaas ... I took it upon myself to create a new thread for Deepak's emails.  When you get back you can do what you want with them.

Janet

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=151376#151376


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: the big hammer on May 02, 2007, 06:27:16 PM
Sexual Contact

spock writes: So about 2 hours after leaving C&C DK is online with a friend who he admitted telling he had some sexual contact

Now that's some good monkeying around.

Nice work, spock.  Thanks.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 06:27:28 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
That's the dumbest thing i have ever heard. Deepak is a moron.

And he outwitted ALE...

They ALE let him outwit them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 06:33:32 PM
seeeeeeeeeeeeeee


they got them


anyone can see it

its over


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 06:34:27 PM
One last comment then back to work. . .

Those statements are full of things just like this and we have discussed many of them before including this one.  We only have a small percentage of them and not even Joran's first one.

Joran says some things out of time sequence just like this, knowing about things before he should as well.

Apparently it means nothing for them to say these things.  Deepak even thinking about messing up an investigation the minute he got home says he was just involved in a crime, something to be investigated and yet this apparently means nothing.

 :smt102

All that stuff Joran says in his lurid statement was going on in the back seat and yet Natalee was out of it and it mean nothing.

Lying to the police is considered normal and means nothing.

What kind of a place is that anyway!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 06:36:01 PM
I have to agree with Igsigs that Deepak is a moron...he's suing Dr.Phil,yet this stuff is "out there" and doesn't think it will be noticed or what?It galls me that they think they're are entitled to money anyhow.
Who in the hell do they think they are?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 06:36:41 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Sexual Contact

spock writes: So about 2 hours after leaving C&C DK is online with a friend who he admitted telling he had some sexual contact

Now that's some good monkeying around.

Nice work, spock.  Thanks.

.


if true, it places Joran again with Natalee as his book now say 3 hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 06:44:13 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Spock ... I have a copy of Deepak's emails.

Klaas ... the emails would make for an extremely long post.  Maybe I should create a separate thread or ... post them in an existing thread.

Janet


The Deepak emails are already in the Important Case Document forum down at the bottom.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 06:46:17 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I have to agree with Igsigs that Deepak is a moron...he's suing Dr.Phil,yet this stuff is "out there" and doesn't think it will be noticed or what?It galls me that they think they're are entitled to money anyhow.
Who in the hell do they think they are?

Exactly.

I think Deepak was convinced by his so called legal team in the U.S. that he would get a ton of money.  I think whoever convinced him did it on purpose in order to get him here in the U.S. Courts.

See you in court sucker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 06:50:08 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I have to agree with Igsigs that Deepak is a moron...he's suing Dr.Phil,yet this stuff is "out there" and doesn't think it will be noticed or what?It galls me that they think they're are entitled to money anyhow.
Who in the hell do they think they are?

Deepak is finding out *who* he is right now. Aruba denied his work permit. His suspect status was continued. KLPD is on his ass and he is desperately trying to settle his lawsuit and Dr. Phil, who has him on ignore.

Cue the jackhammers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 06:51:20 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I have to agree with Igsigs that Deepak is a moron...he's suing Dr.Phil,yet this stuff is "out there" and doesn't think it will be noticed or what?It galls me that they think they're are entitled to money anyhow.
Who in the hell do they think they are?

Deepak is finding out *who* he is right now. Aruba denied his work permit. His suspect status was continued. KLPD is on his ass and he is desperately trying to settle his lawsuit and Dr. Phil, who has him on ignore.

Cue the jackhammers.


that is IT...........in a NUTSHELL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 06:53:26 PM
deepak would be better off TURNING himself in and declaring himself the
CROWN WITNESS..........do a little time



wait a minute, thats what i have been saying he did

 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 06:58:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Spock"
Found it after some searching. The declaration by deepak on 6/29 that he had in fact messaged another that he had sexual contact with Natalee. This was taken from his 6/29 statement, I am still looking for the email/chat.

Quote
"You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this (an admission) to frustrate/mess up the investigation".


Spock ... I have a copy of Deepak's emails.

Klaas ... the emails would make for an extremely long post.  Maybe I should create a separate thread or ... post them in an existing thread.

Janet


The Deepak emails are already in the Important Case Document forum down at the bottom.


Klaas ... I thought that those emails would have been posted somewhere on the site.  Please delete my thread.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 07:01:38 PM
Tamikosmom - I'll leave it for now.  If you had problems finding them others probably do too.  Just remember to always check the Important Case Doc forum..I moved alot of stuff there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 07:07:16 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I have to agree with Igsigs that Deepak is a moron...he's suing Dr.Phil,yet this stuff is "out there" and doesn't think it will be noticed or what?It galls me that they think they're are entitled to money anyhow.
Who in the hell do they think they are?

Exactly.

I think Deepak was convinced by his so called legal team in the U.S. that he would get a ton of money.  I think whoever convinced him did it on purpose in order to get him here in the U.S. Courts.

See you in court sucker.


Yep,and since Arlene and others said the NFI report said the tape was manipulated and tried to make it sound as tho it was tampered with they thought no one would ever know the real truth about it..they took it and ran with it.Don't think it's gonna work though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 07:13:19 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I have to agree with Igsigs that Deepak is a moron...he's suing Dr.Phil,yet this stuff is "out there" and doesn't think it will be noticed or what?It galls me that they think they're are entitled to money anyhow.
Who in the hell do they think they are?

Deepak is finding out *who* he is right now. Aruba denied his work permit. His suspect status was continued. KLPD is on his ass and he is desperately trying to settle his lawsuit and Dr. Phil, who has him on ignore.

Cue the jackhammers.


If I were Deepak and Satish I'd be mad as hell right now...lol..here Joran is with his book deal,probably got a cut of the money already and will make more if it sells...and Deepak and Satish have been had by Joran's tales in so called book,may get thrown in jail before any court doings even happen...too funny!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 07:14:34 PM
Well, for me this has always been about Deepak's anticipation of an investigation the minute he got home and not the alleged sexual contact.

You can't get a girl drunk enough to put her hand down Deepak's pants  That never happened at least not in that context.

He almost makes it sound like she molested him or something but that part is not incriminating in and of itself as far as I can see.

It's his motive for saying it, to mess up the investigation that salts my snails.  The minute he walks in the door he is thinking how to mess up an investigation?  Obviously, he had just committed a crime of some sort to warrant that concern about investigations.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 07:19:23 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Well, for me this has always been about Deepak's anticipation of an investigation the minute he got home and not the alleged sexual contact.

You can't get a girl drunk enough to put her hand down Deepak's pants  That never happened at least not in that context.

He almost makes it sound like she molested him or something but that part is not incriminating in and of itself as far as I can see.

It's his motive for saying it, to mess up the investigation that salts my snails.  The minute he walks in the door he is thinking how to mess up an investigation?  Obviously, he had just committed a crime of some sort to warrant that concern about investigations.

.

You are exactly right Anna.  So for him to say they didn't know a girl was missing is BS because he admitted they he needed to mess up an investigation.

They are admitting to all this stuff because I think he was confident these documents would never be made public.  He didn't care because the powers that be told him he would never be prosecuted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 07:20:08 PM
Hey Monkeys

Which lies are we talking about tonight  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 07:20:33 PM
Anna-salts my snails  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 07:25:33 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys

Which lies are we talking about tonight  :lol:

Pick one OF!  :lol:

In Joran's book he says ...why would i admit my shoes are missing if i was trying to cover anything up.

Don't even know were to start with that one...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 07:35:48 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Don't even know were to start with that one...

But i will anyway!

On 6/9 Joran lies and says he does not know what shoes he wore that night. His book is reliant on an ignorant public.

He lied. He lies. He cannot stop lying.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 07:37:49 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys

Which lies are we talking about tonight  :lol:

Pick one OF!  :lol:

In Joran's book he says ...why would i admit my shoes are missing if i was trying to cover anything up.

Don't even know were to start with that one...


I have come to belive Joran said anything that happened to pop in his mind at the time.  No reason to tell the truth about anything and a lot not to.  The more contridictions the better off he was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 07:49:47 PM
Author Post
medleyrelay
Member


Joined: Tue Feb 14th, 2006
Location: Between Pittsburgh & Tampa, Florida USA
Posts: 2196
Mana:
Posted: Wed May 2nd, 2007 03:09 pm
Quote Reply
Apparently the next issue of the Enquirer that will be out on the stands later this week - WILL INDEED have an article about the NEW COUPLE!!!

John Ramsey & Beth Holloway Twitty - So there ya go!! I am for sure going to be buying this issue of my favorite ragsheet!

 :shock:  :shock: This can't possibly be true,or is it?I have been reading rumors of this.Not that it's any of my business who Beth sees,but this is a real shock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 07:49:50 PM
Gee
I did not mean to run everyone off



Reading the PDF

The dates of some times and #of pages makes me go Hmmmm sometimes..  IE.
Phone Records  June 2, 2005  3:49pm
13 pages
Phone traffic between Deepak, Satish and Joran

June 1, 2005
5 pages
Chat between Deepak and Charles Croes

Is this the date when the documents were prepared or the date of the subject matter :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 07:55:44 PM
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 07:57:38 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Author Post
medleyrelay
Member


Joined: Tue Feb 14th, 2006
Location: Between Pittsburgh & Tampa, Florida USA
Posts: 2196
Mana:
Posted: Wed May 2nd, 2007 03:09 pm
Quote Reply
Apparently the next issue of the Enquirer that will be out on the stands later this week - WILL INDEED have an article about the NEW COUPLE!!!

John Ramsey & Beth Holloway Twitty - So there ya go!! I am for sure going to be buying this issue of my favorite ragsheet!

 :shock:  :shock: This can't possibly be true,or is it?I have been reading rumors of this.Not that it's any of my business who Beth sees,but this is a real shock.
Probably BS...Jmo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 07:59:31 PM
GEL - I believe it's probably true and agree with you it's none of our business.  It also has nothing to do with this case.  I heard something about it a while back and didn't see a reason to bring it up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 02, 2007, 07:59:44 PM
hello monkeys.nothing to add


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 07:59:49 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies
I wanted to ask if anyone else has already done this? TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 08:00:14 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Author Post
medleyrelay
Member


Joined: Tue Feb 14th, 2006
Location: Between Pittsburgh & Tampa, Florida USA
Posts: 2196
Mana:
Posted: Wed May 2nd, 2007 03:09 pm
Quote Reply
Apparently the next issue of the Enquirer that will be out on the stands later this week - WILL INDEED have an article about the NEW COUPLE!!!

John Ramsey & Beth Holloway Twitty - So there ya go!! I am for sure going to be buying this issue of my favorite ragsheet!

 :shock:  :shock: This can't possibly be true,or is it?I have been reading rumors of this.Not that it's any of my business who Beth sees,but this is a real shock.
Probably BS...Jmo


That's what I thought too,but she's saying Enquirer emailed her back and confirmed it..anyway I hope it's not true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:01:05 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gee
I did not mean to run everyone off



Reading the PDF

The dates of some times and #of pages makes me go Hmmmm sometimes..  IE.
Phone Records  June 2, 2005  3:49pm
13 pages
Phone traffic between Deepak, Satish and Joran

June 1, 2005
5 pages
Chat between Deepak and Charles Croes

Is this the date when the documents were prepared or the date of the subject matter :?

I'm guessing the date the document was prepared, but I'd have to look at the PDF to be sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:01:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GEL - I believe it's probably true and agree with you it's none of our business.  It also has nothing to do with this case.  I heard something about it a while back and didn't see a reason to bring it up.
oh! sorry


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 08:01:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GEL - I believe it's probably true and agree with you it's none of our business.  It also has nothing to do with this case.  I heard something about it a while back and didn't see a reason to bring it up.


You're right and you can delete my posts if you like.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 08:01:48 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies


Elaine
Not sure if I can count the high even if I could use all of the Monkey's fingers and toes :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 08:03:19 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Author Post
medleyrelay
Member


Joined: Tue Feb 14th, 2006
Location: Between Pittsburgh & Tampa, Florida USA
Posts: 2196
Mana:
Posted: Wed May 2nd, 2007 03:09 pm
Quote Reply
Apparently the next issue of the Enquirer that will be out on the stands later this week - WILL INDEED have an article about the NEW COUPLE!!!

John Ramsey & Beth Holloway Twitty - So there ya go!! I am for sure going to be buying this issue of my favorite ragsheet!

 :shock:  :shock: This can't possibly be true,or is it?I have been reading rumors of this.Not that it's any of my business who Beth sees,but this is a real shock.


It was just on Inside Edition. I only saw the end of the story and had the volume down so I can't give any details...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:05:04 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies


Elaine
Not sure if I can count the high even if I could use all of the Monkey's fingers and toes :wink:
perhaps if we put 5 monkeys together? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:06:23 PM
JUST A THOUGHT - DOES IT REALLY MATTER WHO BETH TWITTY IS DATING?  IS IT ANY OF OUR BUSINESS?  DOES IT CHANGE WHAT HAPPENED IN ARUBA?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 08:06:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GEL - I believe it's probably true and agree with you it's none of our business.  It also has nothing to do with this case.  I heard something about it a while back and didn't see a reason to bring it up.

I agree it's none of our business.

If there is going to be an article it will keep Natalee's name in the news.  Especially what Aruba did to her daughter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 08:07:12 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies


Elaine
Not sure if I can count the high even if I could use all of the Monkey's fingers and toes :wink:
perhaps if we put 5 monkeys together? :lol:


We will need a   L O T  more than 5     JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: oldfart on May 02, 2007, 08:10:02 PM
:smt039
SeeeeYaaLater


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazymom on May 02, 2007, 08:10:37 PM
OT ALERT!!!!  Klaas and CBB, Can one of you help me with a graphic for t-shirts for the Vigil I am planning for Jaycee Hardin?  Please with sugar on top!!!  Klaas I will send you an email and you can work on it or see if CBB can.  I will give the details later.  TIA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:11:33 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
GEL - I believe it's probably true and agree with you it's none of our business.  It also has nothing to do with this case.  I heard something about it a while back and didn't see a reason to bring it up.

I agree it's none of our business.

If there is going to be an article it will keep Natalee's name in the news.  Especially what Aruba did to her daughter.
I agree with both of you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 08:11:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUST A THOUGHT - DOES IT REALLY MATTER WHO BETH TWITTY IS DATING?  IS IT ANY OF OUR BUSINESS?  DOES IT CHANGE WHAT HAPPENED IN ARUBA?


It doesn't matter to me other than it would be nice to know she has found a bit of happiness in all her grief...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:12:08 PM
Quote from: "crazymom"
OT ALERT!!!!  Klaas and CBB, Can one of you help me with a graphic for t-shirts for the Vigil I am planning for Jaycee Hardin?  Please with sugar on top!!!  Klaas I will send you an email and you can work on it or see if CBB can.  I will give the details later.  TIA.


Sure, just email me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Spock on May 02, 2007, 08:12:25 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies
I wanted to ask if anyone else has already done this? TIA


Complete exhaustive compilation done last summer at BFN. Must be 20 pages long, they missed nothing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:12:49 PM
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUST A THOUGHT - DOES IT REALLY MATTER WHO BETH TWITTY IS DATING?  IS IT ANY OF OUR BUSINESS?  DOES IT CHANGE WHAT HAPPENED IN ARUBA?


It doesn't matter to me other than it would be nice to know she has found a bit of happiness in all her grief...


Excellent point.  It sounds like maybe she has.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:12:55 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
:smt039
SeeeeYaaLater
Take care OF !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazymom on May 02, 2007, 08:13:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazymom"
OT ALERT!!!!  Klaas and CBB, Can one of you help me with a graphic for t-shirts for the Vigil I am planning for Jaycee Hardin?  Please with sugar on top!!!  Klaas I will send you an email and you can work on it or see if CBB can.  I will give the details later.  TIA.


Sure, just email me.


Thanks.  I need to go to the store so it will be later tonight!!


Oh, I forgot my manners!  Hey Monkeys!  I will see you soon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 08:13:47 PM
Sorry Klaas-it has nothing to do with Aruba,and as I said none of my business it was just something I had blew off when I read rumors and it was a shock to see it.You'll hear no more out of me on the subject.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:15:05 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Hello Monkeys! I am composing a list of all Joran's documented lies... I am up to 32 ...so far. When I have it complete I will post it...any you find, will be appreciated. here are a few....1. Told Dad he was in for the night 2. Told Natalee and freinds he was 19  3. Told them he lived in Holland 4. Holiday Inn drop off   etc etc etc... as I say I am up to 32 lies
I wanted to ask if anyone else has already done this? TIA


Complete exhaustive compilation done last summer at BFN. Must be 20 pages long, they missed nothing.
Wow!! Thanks SpocK! I hadn't seen that, which is why I asked. I want to read that later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:15:54 PM
GEL - I know.  I don't have a problem with the information being posted here.  If it was on Inside Edition and in the NE it's going to be all in the news anyway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:16:21 PM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazymom"
OT ALERT!!!!  Klaas and CBB, Can one of you help me with a graphic for t-shirts for the Vigil I am planning for Jaycee Hardin?  Please with sugar on top!!!  Klaas I will send you an email and you can work on it or see if CBB can.  I will give the details later.  TIA.


Sure, just email me.


Thanks.  I need to go to the store so it will be later tonight!!


Oh, I forgot my manners!  Hey Monkeys!  I will see you soon!
Good luck with Jaycee's vigil!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:18:05 PM
VMS , good to see you posting again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 08:18:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GEL - I know.  I don't have a problem with the information being posted here.  If it was on Inside Edition and in the NE it's going to be all in the news anyway.


ok, 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 08:19:03 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
VMS , good to see you posting again.


Ah, thanks Elaine.
Nice to see you here.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ozziesmom on May 02, 2007, 08:21:55 PM
Hey Monkeys, just thought I'd stop in and say hello!!

How is everyone?????

Any word on the searches?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:24:05 PM
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Hey Monkeys, just thought I'd stop in and say hello!!

How is everyone?????

Any word on the searches?
Hi Ozzies! Good here and hope you are as well! I think we are just waiting to hear an analysis on the evidence that the Dutch took away. No Body, but perhaps evidence?.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:24:19 PM
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Hey Monkeys, just thought I'd stop in and say hello!!

How is everyone?????

Any word on the searches?

Hi Ozzies -

No searches today that we know of.  Maybe they are going through the items they confiscated from the Sloot home?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ozziesmom on May 02, 2007, 08:26:29 PM
I hope we get something from these searches. A girl does not just disappear off the face of the earth!! As much as the Sloots would like her to, there has to be something somewhere!

No parent shoud have to endure this and for this long!! It makes me ill!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 08:31:33 PM
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
I hope we get something from these searches. A girl does not just disappear off the face of the earth!! As much as the Sloots would like her to, there has to be something somewhere!

No parent shoud have to endure this and for this long!! It makes me ill!


Hi Ozzies. Please give that gorgeous Ozzie a big hug and smooch from me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ozziesmom on May 02, 2007, 08:34:42 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
I hope we get something from these searches. A girl does not just disappear off the face of the earth!! As much as the Sloots would like her to, there has to be something somewhere!

No parent shoud have to endure this and for this long!! It makes me ill!


Hi Ozzies. Please give that gorgeous Ozzie a big hug and smooch from me.


I sure will, he's so fat, he's on a diet!

How's everything??????I missed everyone!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 08:35:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Hey Monkeys, just thought I'd stop in and say hello!!

How is everyone?????

Any word on the searches?

Hi Ozzies -

No searches today that we know of.  Maybe they are going through the items they confiscated from the Sloot home?

Yes they are going through diaries.

Dear diary,

I am writing to you because I was told way ahead of time that the KLPD would be coming to confiscate my diaries.  I hope the KLPD enjoys my thoughts especially the ones I write about my psycho son Joran.  He is such a good boy :roll:  and I hope that my words won't be taken out of context.  I think the KLPD are the smartest people in the world and they would never go against my husband.  In fact I have it on good authority that once they take this diary they will inform us nothing was found.  Can you believe they searched and dug up my driveway.  How dare they do that to my beautiful tree.  By the way I just wanted to inform them not to dig up the pool because they might find something.  Oh well it is good to right my thoughts down for these people because they are really the ALE disguising themselves as the KLPD.  Take care diary until I write again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on May 02, 2007, 08:36:11 PM
Beth has been thru alot. More than we can possibly know. If she can find some happiness for herself, then go for it. She deseves to be happy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 08:36:55 PM
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
I hope we get something from these searches. A girl does not just disappear off the face of the earth!! As much as the Sloots would like her to, there has to be something somewhere!

No parent shoud have to endure this and for this long!! It makes me ill!


Hi Ozzies. Please give that gorgeous Ozzie a big hug and smooch from me.


I sure will, he's so fat, he's on a diet!

How's everything??????I missed everyone!


Things are good and we've missed you too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:37:10 PM
Just posted on the front page of SM by a poster going by the name Stranger:  :lol:

Has anyone here ever spent a few minutes looking at Aruba Today and the Image, something or other, publication Renfro is involved with? Those aren’t exactly hard news type publications. Aruba Today looks like one of those throw away rags that are left on the night stands of hotel rooms and the image things is a pure fashion mag. How did she get involved with this case in the first place and why would networks like Fox, CNN and MSNBC turn to her for info about a missing person case? In this country that would be like asking Martha Stewart what happened to Jimmy Hoffa. WTH?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 08:38:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted on the front page of SM by a poster going by the name Stranger:  :lol:

Has anyone here ever spent a few minutes looking at Aruba Today and the Image, something or other, publication Renfro is involved with? Those aren’t exactly hard news type publications. Aruba Today looks like one of those throw away rags that are left on the night stands of hotel rooms and the image things is a pure fashion mag. How did she get involved with this case in the first place and why would networks like Fox, CNN and MSNBC turn to her for info about a missing person case? In this country that would be like asking Martha Stewart what happened to Jimmy Hoffa. WTH?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 08:38:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
JUST A THOUGHT - DOES IT REALLY MATTER WHO BETH TWITTY IS DATING?  IS IT ANY OF OUR BUSINESS?  DOES IT CHANGE WHAT HAPPENED IN ARUBA?


 I could not agree with you more Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 08:39:12 PM
Any media coverage expected tonight?

TIA

JMO   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 08:40:53 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Beth has been thru alot. More than we can possibly know. If she can find some happiness for herself, then go for it. She deseves to be happy.


I totally agree, Kat_Gram. Anyone who has suffered so much pain deserves any chance she can get at happiness. I hope she does end up in a loving relationship with someone who will give comfort and support to her in the future.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 08:41:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted on the front page of SM by a poster going by the name Stranger:  :lol:

Has anyone here ever spent a few minutes looking at Aruba Today and the Image, something or other, publication Renfro is involved with? Those aren’t exactly hard news type publications. Aruba Today looks like one of those throw away rags that are left on the night stands of hotel rooms and the image things is a pure fashion mag. How did she get involved with this case in the first place and why would networks like Fox, CNN and MSNBC turn to her for info about a missing person case? In this country that would be like asking Martha Stewart what happened to Jimmy Hoffa. WTH?


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 08:43:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Any media coverage expected tonight?

TIA

JMO   :lol:

Not that I know of but I wouldn't be surprised if they had something, just to say nothing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Elaine on May 02, 2007, 08:44:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Hey Monkeys, just thought I'd stop in and say hello!!

How is everyone?????

Any word on the searches?

Hi Ozzies -

No searches today that we know of.  Maybe they are going through the items they confiscated from the Sloot home?

Yes they are going through diaries.

Dear diary,

I am writing to you because I was told way ahead of time that the KLPD would be coming to confiscate my diaries.  I hope the KLPD enjoys my thoughts especially the ones I write about my psycho son Joran.  He is such a good boy :roll:  and I hope that my words won't be taken out of context.  I think the KLPD are the smartest people in the world and they would never go against my husband.  In fact I have it on good authority that once they take this diary they will inform us nothing was found.  Can you believe they searched and dug up my driveway.  How dare they do that to my beautiful tree.  By the way I just wanted to inform them not to dig up the pool because they might find something.  Oh well it is good to right my thoughts down for these people because they are really the ALE disguising themselves as the KLPD.  Take care diary until I write again.
PS. I still have the see through blouse, they can not have that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 08:44:29 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Any media coverage expected tonight?

TIA

JMO   :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 08:45:14 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Hey Monkeys, just thought I'd stop in and say hello!!

How is everyone?????

Any word on the searches?

Hi Ozzies -

No searches today that we know of.  Maybe they are going through the items they confiscated from the Sloot home?

Yes they are going through diaries.

Dear diary,

I am writing to you because I was told way ahead of time that the KLPD would be coming to confiscate my diaries.  I hope the KLPD enjoys my thoughts especially the ones I write about my psycho son Joran.  He is such a good boy :roll:  and I hope that my words won't be taken out of context.  I think the KLPD are the smartest people in the world and they would never go against my husband.  In fact I have it on good authority that once they take this diary they will inform us nothing was found.  Can you believe they searched and dug up my driveway.  How dare they do that to my beautiful tree.  By the way I just wanted to inform them not to dig up the pool because they might find something.  Oh well it is good to right my thoughts down for these people because they are really the ALE disguising themselves as the KLPD.  Take care diary until I write again.
PS. I still have the see through blouse, they can not have that.

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 08:45:21 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
PS. I still have the see through blouse, they can not have that.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sue on May 02, 2007, 08:46:28 PM
If Beth is dating John then more power to her.. If anyone would know
what Beth is suffering through it would be John
God Bless them both, If true I want them to have all the
Happiness that life and god has to give


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ozziesmom on May 02, 2007, 08:53:08 PM
Joron lied?????  No way!!!!!:lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 08:55:06 PM
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Joron lied?????  No way!!!!!:lol:  :lol:  :lol:


  :)
  Ozzies!!  Great to see you!!
<I am trying to get caught up>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 08:55:51 PM
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Joron lied?????  No way!!!!!:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

And Satish still can't talk :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: ozziesmom on May 02, 2007, 08:58:03 PM
I just wanted to let everyone know that just because I haven't been here, not a day goes by that I don't think of Natalee or her family. It is just something that touched me in a way that I cannot explain and I will never give up hope that she will be found and her assailants will be brought to justice...

Off my soap box  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: friend of monkeys on May 02, 2007, 09:01:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Any media coverage expected tonight?

TIA

JMO   :lol:

Not that I know of but I wouldn't be surprised if they had something, just to say nothing.


am going soon......nite monkeys :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:02:59 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Any media coverage expected tonight?

TIA

JMO   :lol:

Not that I know of but I wouldn't be surprised if they had something, just to say nothing.


am going soon......nite monkeys :lol:


Nite FOM. Have a good evening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:05:21 PM
Klaas - is it okay if I post something kind of amusing from the Coffee Pot Ghost?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:08:40 PM
Just thought maybe it would jog something if we put this in some kind of order and figure out why a Pilot & photographer would make
SEVEN Statements to Aruba LE investigators.


JUNE 13, 2005

June 13, - Andres Meneses, an airline pilot and photographer gave a statement to Aruba LE.


June 13, 2005 - JORANS STATEMENT ON JUNE 13, 2005 - I drove Natalee — We drove Natalee to my home at 1:40am. I want her to come in. I have sex with her.
                Joran states, "Deepak hid the corpse of the missing girl"
                KOCK verifies this is in the statement of Joran http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166635,00.html
                IamTito confirms this:
                Joined: 10 Aug 2005
                Location: aruba PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:00 pm    Post subject:    Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
                DT... Joran signed a statement on june 13 indicating that Deepak might have raped and then killed Natalee... but as far as him .. he confessed to his mother that they kissed.. and were together.. but no sexual assault..

June 13, 2005 - Mickey Johns – arrested June 5, 2005 now released June 13, 2005
               John says Deepak Kalpoe told him they lied about dropping off Natalee at Holiday Inn
               John says Deepak told him they dropped off Joran and Natalee at Marriott and left
June 13, 2005 - Abraham Jones – arrested June 5, 2005 now released June 13, 2005



JUNE 15, 2005
June 15, 2005 - Polis search Van der Sloot residence and tow away two vehicles.


JUNE 16, 2005
JUNE 16, 2005 - I had the info at 12:30 AM on June 16th and the boys were seen cleaning the car out on the Tuesday after the disappearance.
Posted by: Dan | August 14, 2005 05:10 AM (rwv)

June 16, 17 - BETH TWITTY: I know on the 31st that Paul van der Sloot stated that he picked Joran up at 4 a.m. At McDonald's. It was also said to me by a police spokesperson on June 16 and June 17 that Paul van der Sloot stated  that he picked up Joran at 4 a.m. on the 31st at McDonald's. But I noticed on the day that I visited Paul van der Sloot at his home, all of a sudden, it was changed to 11 p.m.
 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html

June 16, 2005 - Steve Croes goes to polis with his fabricated lie.



JUNE 17, 2005
Steve Croes is arrested

JUNE 18, 2005
Rene van Heyningen found murdered “Columbian necktie” - van Heyningen’s body dumped in government cemetery



June 19, 2005 - Andres Meneses, an airline pilot and photographer gives his second interview to Aruba LE.


Sunday, July 31, 2005
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/unusual_activit.html


AUGUST 12, 2005
8/12/05

Today the local language newspaper Diario (which is owned by frequent MSNBC guest Jossy Mansur) published what
the newspaper says is a signed police interview (or "declaration") with Joran van der Sloot in which van der
 Sloot says Deepak Kalpoe raped, killed, and burried Natalee Holloway.

Beth Twitty
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/23/lkl.01.html
February 23, 2007

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: I know one thing that Deepak Kalpoe did in August was, when the gardener came before the
judge of instruction to give sworn testimony of witnessing those three suspects together in the Kalpoe brothers'
car that night at the pond, across the street from the Marriott, it was in front of the prosecutor, in front of
the defense, the judge of instruction, Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, Joran Van Der Sloot.

Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon,
he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI.
She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.



AUGUST 14, 2005

Aug, 14, 2005 - Pilot and photographer Andres Meneses gives his third statement to Aruba LE.

August 14, 2005 - Melody posts online: his friend told me he called him the next day all shocked, that he had
something ot tell him, and he told him that the girl went missing.
Posted by: Melody | August 14, 2005 04:26 AM


AUGUST 29, 2005
Freddy Zedan Arambatzis Arrested: August 29,2005


May 10, 2006 -  Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

May 15, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 5th interview to Aruba LE.
May 26, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 6th interview to Aruba LE.
June 5, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 7th interview to Aruba LE.
(Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil lawsuit)
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/images/MemoKalpoe.pdf


SEVEN INTERVIEWS TO ARUBA LE by a Pilot and photographer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:10:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "ozziesmom"
Joron lied?????  No way!!!!!:lol:  :lol:  :lol:

And Satish still can't talk :lol:

And apparently can't read either, he's in his 20s and still in high school?
And Nidira hopes he'll be a doctor someday too like Natalee would have been.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:10:34 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - is it okay if I post something kind of amusing from the Coffee Pot Ghost?


Sure but don't ask me to believe in it, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:12:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - is it okay if I post something kind of amusing from the Coffee Pot Ghost?


Sure but don't ask me to believe in it, lol  :lol:


Okay, TY. Here it is:  :lol:

Q: expose SANDRAK

sarcastic imitation of SANDRAK: " I_AM_A_SASSY_PUSSY "
 other_OH_NO____jesus
 HIDING_A_FELLOW_EATEN_AWAAAAAAY_INSIDE
HE_DYES_EGGS_FOR_PATTI_AND_IS_KNOWING_YOUR_COFFEE
 TRAITOR_AIN,T_A_OWL__WATCH_OUT__HE'S_IN_"THE_FAMILY"

link: "Meet The Family"

to_sandrak:_THEY_ALL_DIE,__FOOLISH_MAN--
 ---THE_LAW_KNOWS_YOU

break an egg SANDRAK, enjoy your coffee
and have a nice day


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:12:41 PM
Kermit - great idea!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:14:57 PM
BTgirl - I saw that, LOL  :lol:  It's obvious who ever runs that coffee pot site follows the case and plays along.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:15:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
BTgirl - I saw that, LOL  :lol:  It's obvious who ever runs that coffee pot site follows the case and plays along.


Yeah - I got a kick out of that one. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:17:22 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - is it okay if I post something kind of amusing from the Coffee Pot Ghost?


Sure but don't ask me to believe in it, lol  :lol:


Okay, TY. Here it is:  :lol:

Q: expose SANDRAK

sarcastic imitation of SANDRAK: " I_AM_A_SASSY_PUSSY "
 other_OH_NO____jesus
 HIDING_A_FELLOW_EATEN_AWAAAAAAY_INSIDE
HE_DYES_EGGS_FOR_PATTI_AND_IS_KNOWING_YOUR_COFFEE
 TRAITOR_AIN,T_A_OWL__WATCH_OUT__HE'S_IN_"THE_FAMILY"

link: "Meet The Family"

to_sandrak:_THEY_ALL_DIE,__FOOLISH_MAN--
 ---THE_LAW_KNOWS_YOU

break an egg SANDRAK, enjoy your coffee
and have a nice day


 Oh brother.. LOL
 Sorry BT.. neevr believed in the coffee pot  ROFL  :oops:
 IIRC wasn't it up for bid on ebay not long ago???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:18:36 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - is it okay if I post something kind of amusing from the Coffee Pot Ghost?


Sure but don't ask me to believe in it, lol  :lol:


Okay, TY. Here it is:  :lol:

Q: expose SANDRAK

sarcastic imitation of SANDRAK: " I_AM_A_SASSY_PUSSY "
 other_OH_NO____jesus
 HIDING_A_FELLOW_EATEN_AWAAAAAAY_INSIDE
HE_DYES_EGGS_FOR_PATTI_AND_IS_KNOWING_YOUR_COFFEE
 TRAITOR_AIN,T_A_OWL__WATCH_OUT__HE'S_IN_"THE_FAMILY"

link: "Meet The Family"

to_sandrak:_THEY_ALL_DIE,__FOOLISH_MAN--
 ---THE_LAW_KNOWS_YOU

break an egg SANDRAK, enjoy your coffee
and have a nice day

Any idea how that translates?  Sounds like a rap song gone crack.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:19:44 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Just thought maybe it would jog something if we put this in some kind of order and figure out why a Pilot & photographer would make
SEVEN Statements to Aruba LE investigators.


JUNE 13, 2005

June 13, - Andres Meneses, an airline pilot and photographer gave a statement to Aruba LE.


June 13, 2005 - JORANS STATEMENT ON JUNE 13, 2005 - I drove Natalee — We drove Natalee to my home at 1:40am. I want her to come in. I have sex with her.
                Joran states, "Deepak hid the corpse of the missing girl"
                KOCK verifies this is in the statement of Joran http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166635,00.html
                IamTito confirms this:
                Joined: 10 Aug 2005
                Location: aruba PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:00 pm    Post subject:    Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
                DT... Joran signed a statement on june 13 indicating that Deepak might have raped and then killed Natalee... but as far as him .. he confessed to his mother that they kissed.. and were together.. but no sexual assault..

June 13, 2005 - Mickey Johns – arrested June 5, 2005 now released June 13, 2005
               John says Deepak Kalpoe told him they lied about dropping off Natalee at Holiday Inn
               John says Deepak told him they dropped off Joran and Natalee at Marriott and left
June 13, 2005 - Abraham Jones – arrested June 5, 2005 now released June 13, 2005



JUNE 15, 2005
June 15, 2005 - Polis search Van der Sloot residence and tow away two vehicles.


JUNE 16, 2005
JUNE 16, 2005 - I had the info at 12:30 AM on June 16th and the boys were seen cleaning the car out on the Tuesday after the disappearance.
Posted by: Dan | August 14, 2005 05:10 AM (rwv)

June 16, 17 - BETH TWITTY: I know on the 31st that Paul van der Sloot stated that he picked Joran up at 4 a.m. At McDonald's. It was also said to me by a police spokesperson on June 16 and June 17 that Paul van der Sloot stated  that he picked up Joran at 4 a.m. on the 31st at McDonald's. But I noticed on the day that I visited Paul van der Sloot at his home, all of a sudden, it was changed to 11 p.m.
 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html

June 16, 2005 - Steve Croes goes to polis with his fabricated lie.



JUNE 17, 2005
Steve Croes is arrested

JUNE 18, 2005
Rene van Heyningen found murdered “Columbian necktie” - van Heyningen’s body dumped in government cemetery



June 19, 2005 - Andres Meneses, an airline pilot and photographer gives his second interview to Aruba LE.


Sunday, July 31, 2005
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/unusual_activit.html


AUGUST 12, 2005
8/12/05

Today the local language newspaper Diario (which is owned by frequent MSNBC guest Jossy Mansur) published what
the newspaper says is a signed police interview (or "declaration") with Joran van der Sloot in which van der
 Sloot says Deepak Kalpoe raped, killed, and burried Natalee Holloway.

Beth Twitty
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/23/lkl.01.html
February 23, 2007

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: I know one thing that Deepak Kalpoe did in August was, when the gardener came before the
judge of instruction to give sworn testimony of witnessing those three suspects together in the Kalpoe brothers'
car that night at the pond, across the street from the Marriott, it was in front of the prosecutor, in front of
the defense, the judge of instruction, Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, Joran Van Der Sloot.

Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon,
he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI.
She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.



AUGUST 14, 2005

Aug, 14, 2005 - Pilot and photographer Andres Meneses gives his third statement to Aruba LE.

August 14, 2005 - Melody posts online: his friend told me he called him the next day all shocked, that he had
something ot tell him, and he told him that the girl went missing.
Posted by: Melody | August 14, 2005 04:26 AM


AUGUST 29, 2005
Freddy Zedan Arambatzis Arrested: August 29,2005


May 10, 2006 -  Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

May 15, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 5th interview to Aruba LE.
May 26, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 6th interview to Aruba LE.
June 5, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 7th interview to Aruba LE.
(Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil lawsuit)
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/images/MemoKalpoe.pdf


SEVEN INTERVIEWS TO ARUBA LE by a Pilot and photographer.


There are several aerial photos in the Coolaruba search pictures I loaded to Webshots.  These are all of the NH search:

http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2640355350086243696Bzhgdr


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:19:46 PM
Hi there KERMIT!!!

 VERY interesting post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:19:53 PM
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:21:00 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - is it okay if I post something kind of amusing from the Coffee Pot Ghost?


Sure but don't ask me to believe in it, lol  :lol:


Okay, TY. Here it is:  :lol:

Q: expose SANDRAK

sarcastic imitation of SANDRAK: " I_AM_A_SASSY_PUSSY "
 other_OH_NO____jesus
 HIDING_A_FELLOW_EATEN_AWAAAAAAY_INSIDE
HE_DYES_EGGS_FOR_PATTI_AND_IS_KNOWING_YOUR_COFFEE
 TRAITOR_AIN,T_A_OWL__WATCH_OUT__HE'S_IN_"THE_FAMILY"

link: "Meet The Family"

to_sandrak:_THEY_ALL_DIE,__FOOLISH_MAN--
 ---THE_LAW_KNOWS_YOU

break an egg SANDRAK, enjoy your coffee
and have a nice day

Any idea how that translates?  Sounds like a rap song gone crack.

Seriously, are these people on crack or something?  I don't mean to sound naive but some of the stuff they post and say really makes you wonder.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:21:17 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Oh brother.. LOL
 Sorry BT.. neevr believed in the coffee pot  ROFL  :oops:
 IIRC wasn't it up for bid on ebay not long ago???


Oh, I don't believe it, Ang. I think it's just someone joking around and that one was pretty funny.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: JusticeforNatalee on May 02, 2007, 09:22:00 PM
Was this video posted?
http://www.myfoxal.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3092732&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1

Don't worry--Jossy's in it, too. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:22:59 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Any idea how that translates?  Sounds like a rap song gone crack.

Seriously, are these people on crack or something?  I don't mean to sound naive but some of the stuff they post and say really makes you wonder.


IndyDan,

I think whoever does the Coffee Pot Ghost site has a very mischievous sense of humor.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 09:23:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Just thought maybe it would jog something if we put this in some kind of order and figure out why a Pilot & photographer would make
SEVEN Statements to Aruba LE investigators.


JUNE 13, 2005

June 13, - Andres Meneses, an airline pilot and photographer gave a statement to Aruba LE.


June 13, 2005 - JORANS STATEMENT ON JUNE 13, 2005 - I drove Natalee — We drove Natalee to my home at 1:40am. I want her to come in. I have sex with her.
                Joran states, "Deepak hid the corpse of the missing girl"
                KOCK verifies this is in the statement of Joran http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166635,00.html
                IamTito confirms this:
                Joined: 10 Aug 2005
                Location: aruba PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:00 pm    Post subject:    Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
                DT... Joran signed a statement on june 13 indicating that Deepak might have raped and then killed Natalee... but as far as him .. he confessed to his mother that they kissed.. and were together.. but no sexual assault..

June 13, 2005 - Mickey Johns – arrested June 5, 2005 now released June 13, 2005
               John says Deepak Kalpoe told him they lied about dropping off Natalee at Holiday Inn
               John says Deepak told him they dropped off Joran and Natalee at Marriott and left
June 13, 2005 - Abraham Jones – arrested June 5, 2005 now released June 13, 2005



JUNE 15, 2005
June 15, 2005 - Polis search Van der Sloot residence and tow away two vehicles.


JUNE 16, 2005
JUNE 16, 2005 - I had the info at 12:30 AM on June 16th and the boys were seen cleaning the car out on the Tuesday after the disappearance.
Posted by: Dan | August 14, 2005 05:10 AM (rwv)

June 16, 17 - BETH TWITTY: I know on the 31st that Paul van der Sloot stated that he picked Joran up at 4 a.m. At McDonald's. It was also said to me by a police spokesperson on June 16 and June 17 that Paul van der Sloot stated  that he picked up Joran at 4 a.m. on the 31st at McDonald's. But I noticed on the day that I visited Paul van der Sloot at his home, all of a sudden, it was changed to 11 p.m.
 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html

June 16, 2005 - Steve Croes goes to polis with his fabricated lie.



JUNE 17, 2005
Steve Croes is arrested

JUNE 18, 2005
Rene van Heyningen found murdered “Columbian necktie” - van Heyningen’s body dumped in government cemetery



June 19, 2005 - Andres Meneses, an airline pilot and photographer gives his second interview to Aruba LE.


Sunday, July 31, 2005
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/07/unusual_activit.html


AUGUST 12, 2005
8/12/05

Today the local language newspaper Diario (which is owned by frequent MSNBC guest Jossy Mansur) published what
the newspaper says is a signed police interview (or "declaration") with Joran van der Sloot in which van der
 Sloot says Deepak Kalpoe raped, killed, and burried Natalee Holloway.

Beth Twitty
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/23/lkl.01.html
February 23, 2007

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: I know one thing that Deepak Kalpoe did in August was, when the gardener came before the
judge of instruction to give sworn testimony of witnessing those three suspects together in the Kalpoe brothers'
car that night at the pond, across the street from the Marriott, it was in front of the prosecutor, in front of
the defense, the judge of instruction, Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, Joran Van Der Sloot.

Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon,
he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI.
She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.



AUGUST 14, 2005

Aug, 14, 2005 - Pilot and photographer Andres Meneses gives his third statement to Aruba LE.

August 14, 2005 - Melody posts online: his friend told me he called him the next day all shocked, that he had
something ot tell him, and he told him that the girl went missing.
Posted by: Melody | August 14, 2005 04:26 AM


AUGUST 29, 2005
Freddy Zedan Arambatzis Arrested: August 29,2005


May 10, 2006 -  Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

May 15, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 5th interview to Aruba LE.
May 26, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 6th interview to Aruba LE.
June 5, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 7th interview to Aruba LE.
(Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil lawsuit)
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/images/MemoKalpoe.pdf


SEVEN INTERVIEWS TO ARUBA LE by a Pilot and photographer.


There are several aerial photos in the Coolaruba search pictures I loaded to Webshots.  These are all of the NH search:

http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2640355350086243696Bzhgdr


Was this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:23:45 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?

 Evening Rob.
  Im wondering if its the person who tok the ariel shos of the Sloots house, when that VAN was there? The DANA van?  maybe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:23:45 PM
Alright, I gotta hit the hay. Great chattin' with yall, see ya in the morning.
Hi Mishy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:24:54 PM
I think this pilot got the pic of the Dana Furniture Truck and other photos? am I right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:24:57 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Alright, I gotta hit the hay. Great chattin' with yall, see ya in the morning.
Hi Mishy


 Night Indy


 TYLER! Good to see you back!  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:25:57 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
I think this pilot got the pic of the Dana Furniture Truck and other photos? am I right?


 Look above your post.. LOL
 I wonder the same?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:26:03 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:26:24 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi there KERMIT!!!

 VERY interesting post.


Hello Angiex


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:27:12 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.



 Interesting as heck.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:27:32 PM
Tylergal - I don't think so


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:27:32 PM
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.[/quote]

Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 09:28:58 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


I wonder if an aerial pilot could take pictures of people burying and moving things around, go out on the road and watch rocks being painted, or maybe even have a little porn business on the side where he photographs with pimps and maybe even on a certain excursion boat operated by Steve Croes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:29:10 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Any idea how that translates?  Sounds like a rap song gone crack.

Seriously, are these people on crack or something?  I don't mean to sound naive but some of the stuff they post and say really makes you wonder.


IndyDan,

I think whoever does the Coffee Pot Ghost site has a very mischievous sense of humor.  :wink:



 LoL  !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:30:00 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Alright, I gotta hit the hay. Great chattin' with yall, see ya in the morning.
Hi Mishy


 Night Indy


 TYLER! Good to see you back!  :D  :D

Nite Angie!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:30:35 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?

 Evening Rob.
  Im wondering if its the person who tok the ariel shos of the Sloots house, when that VAN was there? The DANA van?  maybe?


He was brought in June 13th - same day Joran places blame on Deepak and says he buried her.

The photo of van der Sloot home appeared on RWV July 31.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:30:46 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


Kerm,
Well, is this guy a helicopter pilot or a plane pilot? Do you know that?

You know there is the black tourist helicopter?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 09:31:33 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.[/quote]

Kermit, we need his witness statement very, very badly.  I don't suppose that will come to pass.  I wonder if this aerial pilot flies for the power company.  Many do that as a side business "bird on the wire," "hole on the pole," "guy wire cut."  You can see a lot from riding with the power company pilots.  They see everything on the ground and have a lot of fun making money from photographing other interesting things.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:31:44 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


I wonder if an aerial pilot could take pictures of people burying and moving things around, go out on the road and watch rocks being painted, or maybe even have a little porn business on the side where he photographs with pimps and maybe even on a certain excursion boat operated by Steve Croes.


But what is his connection to Joran or Paulus - so be in his plane at the right moment?

He has to have a connection to make 7 statements to LE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:31:50 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.[/quote]

I've never heard of him until you brought him up...I have no idea ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 09:32:23 PM
Thanks, Angie,  Night, Monkeys.  Gotta run.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: IndyDan on May 02, 2007, 09:33:02 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Any idea how that translates?  Sounds like a rap song gone crack.

Seriously, are these people on crack or something?  I don't mean to sound naive but some of the stuff they post and say really makes you wonder.


IndyDan,

I think whoever does the Coffee Pot Ghost site has a very mischievous sense of humor.  :wink:

But seriously I don't get the humor, not that I'm a prude I really don't get what they are saying.  Maybe because I don't have young kids at home anymore and I'm out of touch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:33:28 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


Kerm,
Well, is this guy a helicopter pilot or a plane pilot? Do you know that?

You know there is the black tourist helicopter?


Hmmm - maybe he flies for newspapers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:33:56 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


I wonder if an aerial pilot could take pictures of people burying and moving things around, go out on the road and watch rocks being painted, or maybe even have a little porn business on the side where he photographs with pimps and maybe even on a certain excursion boat operated by Steve Croes.


Shango watches from afar.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:34:53 PM
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:36:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


Thank you Klassand.

He has a plethora of photographs, but I can't find one of him. - yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 09:36:02 PM
Interesting point, Kermit, that he flies for the newspaper.  I would wonder if it is the newspaper of low repute that features massage parlors, or is it the one interested in obtaining information for the reading public.  Who here can find out through a census search who this person is.  

I had a friend who used to fly for power company.  It takes two pilots and often they take someone with them that can do shorthand or some reasonable facsimile of it, and I often got called to ride shotgun sotaspeak.  It is interesting what you see in people's back yards.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:37:14 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Interesting point, Kermit, that he flies for the newspaper.  I would wonder if it is the newspaper of low repute that features massage parlors, or is it the one interested in obtaining information for the reading public.  Who here can find out through a census search who this person is.  

I had a friend who used to fly for power company.  It takes two pilots and often they take someone with them that can do shorthand or some reasonable facsimile of it, and I often got called to ride shotgun sotaspeak.  It is interesting what you see in people's back yards.


LOL I'll bet.

It is the 7 times to LE investigators that peeks my interest.
The fact that he flys, he takes photos - makes me think there is more to this guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:37:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: mishy on May 02, 2007, 09:37:56 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Alright, I gotta hit the hay. Great chattin' with yall, see ya in the morning.
Hi Mishy


Hi Indy...You leaving? I was just lurking for a minute waiting for my daughter to finish playing in the bathtub so I can get her out and give her a bedtime snack...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:38:51 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


I wonder if an aerial pilot could take pictures of people burying and moving things around, go out on the road and watch rocks being painted, or maybe even have a little porn business on the side where he photographs with pimps and maybe even on a certain excursion boat operated by Steve Croes.


Shango watches from afar.


Come on out, Lalas - SEX SEX SEX  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: mishy on May 02, 2007, 09:39:05 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.



 Interesting as heck.


Maybe ALE had him go up in his plane and fly around to see what he could see and report back to them  :wink:

Tyler, so glad to see you tonight, my dear  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on May 02, 2007, 09:39:34 PM
Maybe Andres has some pics or videos of the happenings the night Natalee disappeared?
Nahhh,I doubt he'd be alive today if he did and they knew.Maybe he has them in a safe place?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:40:04 PM
Time to go catch some flies.

See ya all later - aligators, I mean monkey's  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:40:15 PM
Hey Kerm, didn't we find another connection to the Airport beyond Universal Air?

Wasn't there another pilot we found on the pilots list? He had a name we all knew... or was seemingly a relative or someone of interest in the case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:42:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Oh thank you Klaasend - I had not seen that.

Then it struck me - one of the Oduber son's likes to photograph/video tape planes too. I wonder if they are connected?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:42:23 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.


Kermit, we need his witness statement very, very badly.  I don't suppose that will come to pass.  I wonder if this aerial pilot flies for the power company.  Many do that as a side business "bird on the wire," "hole on the pole," "guy wire cut."  You can see a lot from riding with the power company pilots.  They see everything on the ground and have a lot of fun making money from photographing other interesting things.[/quote]

 I can't get over I am going to say this.. and lalas will be proud.  lol
 Isn't there a SHANGO reference to a bird on the wire?   :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 09:42:46 PM
Says

Age: 20

Country: Costa Rica


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:42:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Myspace with a photo of him or at least I think it's him.  

http://tinyurl.com/2kjex5


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:43:35 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Hey Kerm, didn't we find another connection to the Airport beyond Universal Air?

Wasn't there another pilot we found on the pilots list? He had a name we all knew... or was seemingly a relative or someone of interest in the case?


Yeah, I just realized that Rob.

Lots of roads come back to Universal Air.

7 statements!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:43:49 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.


Kermit, we need his witness statement very, very badly.  I don't suppose that will come to pass.  I wonder if this aerial pilot flies for the power company.  Many do that as a side business "bird on the wire," "hole on the pole," "guy wire cut."  You can see a lot from riding with the power company pilots.  They see everything on the ground and have a lot of fun making money from photographing other interesting things.


 I can't get over I am going to say this.. and lalas will be proud.  lol
 Isn't there a SHANGO reference to a bird on the wire?   :oops:[/quote]

Lalas - SHANGO SHANGO SHANGO, SEX SEX SEX


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 09:43:54 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Oh thank you Klaasend - I had not seen that.

Then it struck me - one of the Oduber son's likes to photograph/video tape planes too. I wonder if they are connected?


So does one of the Arends/Arendz guys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: justinsmama on May 02, 2007, 09:44:01 PM
Quote
He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


Or was he part of a camera crew and/or transport away into sexual slavery?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:44:09 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.


Kermit, we need his witness statement very, very badly.  I don't suppose that will come to pass.  I wonder if this aerial pilot flies for the power company.  Many do that as a side business "bird on the wire," "hole on the pole," "guy wire cut."  You can see a lot from riding with the power company pilots.  They see everything on the ground and have a lot of fun making money from photographing other interesting things.


 I can't get over I am going to say this.. and lalas will be proud.  lol
 Isn't there a SHANGO reference to a bird on the wire?   :oops:[/quote]

Yes I remember that too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:45:18 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Oh thank you Klaasend - I had not seen that.

Then it struck me - one of the Oduber son's likes to photograph/video tape planes too. I wonder if they are connected?


So does one of the Arends/Arendz guys.


Who?

Arendz runs a yellow mustang.
and
Max Arrends is in the US going to school

Which one does photography?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 09:45:37 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Maybe Andres has some pics or videos of the happenings the night Natalee disappeared?
Nahhh,I doubt he'd be alive today if he did and they knew.Maybe he has them in a safe place?

You could be right.  Maybe he does have them in a safe place because he knows his life is in danger.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:45:54 PM
Found it! Luis Oduber takes off for PINTO FIJO VENEZUELA.

http://www.arubaaviation.com/videos/MOV00576.MPG


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:45:56 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
[quote="TylergalWas this photographer also the one who photographed at the rocks.


Hmmm, I need a picture of Andres so I can compare it.


Kermit, we need his witness statement very, very badly.  I don't suppose that will come to pass.  I wonder if this aerial pilot flies for the power company.  Many do that as a side business "bird on the wire," "hole on the pole," "guy wire cut."  You can see a lot from riding with the power company pilots.  They see everything on the ground and have a lot of fun making money from photographing other interesting things.


 I can't get over I am going to say this.. and lalas will be proud.  lol
 Isn't there a SHANGO reference to a bird on the wire?   :oops:


Lalas - SHANGO SHANGO SHANGO, SEX SEX SEX[/quote]

 :lol:  :lol:  She will come out for sure now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:46:03 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote
He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


Or was he part of a camera crew and/or transport away into sexual slavery?


Well - he is from another country.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 09:46:46 PM
Tyler mentioned something her post about "bird on a wire".  Doesn't Shango or Simian make reference to that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 09:47:20 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"

May 10, 2006 -  Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

May 15, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 5th interview to Aruba LE.
May 26, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 6th interview to Aruba LE.
June 5, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 7th interview to Aruba LE.

Concentration of statements given at this time by Meneses.

This when GVC and AB were arrested? Connected to them somehow?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 09:49:14 PM
http://www.arubaaviation.com/photos.html

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/ArubaAviation1.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:52:36 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Kermit"

May 10, 2006 -  Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

May 15, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 5th interview to Aruba LE.
May 26, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 6th interview to Aruba LE.
June 5, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 7th interview to Aruba LE.

Concentration of statements given at this time by Meneses.

This when GVC and AB were arrested? Connected to them somehow?



He must be connected to this group. Brought in right after Joran,Kalpoes arrested and then later after GVC and AB.

Very interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Kermit on May 02, 2007, 09:53:07 PM
Okay, I gotta fly now. Miss Piggy is demanding!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 09:53:49 PM
Quote from: "San"
Tyler mentioned something her post about "bird on a wire".  Doesn't Shango or Simian make reference to that.

I found the quote:

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
The last hope rests on the shoulders of the cowboys. Ten days, two down, eight to go.
The elder knows the passages in the palace too well. The Babylonians are afraid they might not be able to stop him.
Don’t shake the wire, ‘cause the bird will fy away.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 09:54:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Myspace with a photo of him or at least I think it's him.  

http://tinyurl.com/2kjex5


His Zorpia - got some friends on the Zorpia I need to go through still :wink: :

http://www.zorpia.com/meneses24


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: nonesuche on May 02, 2007, 09:58:21 PM
I do hope someone is saving screenshots of these sites for surely they will disappear POOF soon as word is out they are being discovered here.

sharp supermonkeys working tonight  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 09:58:34 PM
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 09:58:44 PM
Alright!!  Who's taking Shango's name in vain????  :shock:  :shock:

My pencils, where are my pencils?? :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 09:59:27 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Okay, I gotta fly now. Miss Piggy is demanding!


 Night Kermit.. TY!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 10:00:44 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Alright!!  Who's taking Shango's name in vain????  :shock:  :shock:

My pencils, where are my pencils?? :roll:  :roll:


 :smooch  :smooch  :smooch  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:00:54 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 10:01:02 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Alright!!  Who's taking Shango's name in vain????  :shock:  :shock:

My pencils, where are my pencils?? :roll:  :roll:


 :shock:
  Lalas.. can you post that PLEASE. the SHANGO ref to a bird on a wire??
TY !!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 10:01:56 PM
Longshot?

Meneses / Valentijn connection?

May 30 - VAL - forums.x-plane.org  :arrow:  3:07 AM / computer records

http://forums.x-plane.org/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:02:48 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Tyler mentioned something her post about "bird on a wire".  Doesn't Shango or Simian make reference to that.

I found the quote:

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
The last hope rests on the shoulders of the cowboys. Ten days, two down, eight to go.
The elder knows the passages in the palace too well. The Babylonians are afraid they might not be able to stop him.
Don’t shake the wire, ‘cause the bird will fy away.



Done by our sweet San.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 10:03:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


jeez, that's more boring than Joran's new hobby...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:03:27 PM
Is this guy a pilot and a photographer? I am confused here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 10:03:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Okay, I know you know I'm not arguing - but this is what Kermie just posted  :oops: :

May 10, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 10:04:29 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Okay, I know you know I'm not arguing - but this is what Kermie just posted  :oops: :

May 10, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

He seems too young.  Could it be this kids father?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:05:21 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Longshot?

Meneses / Valentijn connection?

May 30 - VAL - forums.x-plane.org  :arrow:  3:07 AM / computer records

http://forums.x-plane.org/


Andres Meneses is into flight simulation as well.  Also, his full name is Andres Meneses Calleja:

http://tinyurl.com/yv2kv7


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 10:05:22 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Tyler mentioned something her post about "bird on a wire".  Doesn't Shango or Simian make reference to that.

I found the quote:

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
The last hope rests on the shoulders of the cowboys. Ten days, two down, eight to go.
The elder knows the passages in the palace too well. The Babylonians are afraid they might not be able to stop him.
Don’t shake the wire, ‘cause the bird will fy away.



Done by our sweet San.



 :oops:  Sorry San .. I missed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 10:05:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Okay, I know you know I'm not arguing - but this is what Kermie just posted  :oops: :

May 10, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

He seems too young.  Could it be this kids father?


I was wondering the same thing, San. If the guy with the Zorpia site might be a junior.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:06:11 PM
I would think he could be a student pilot, still in training at fifteen.  Remember the little nine year old girl who crashed the plane about ten years or more ago?

He is in Costa Rico so maybe Widget could check him out?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 10:06:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Longshot?

Meneses / Valentijn connection?

May 30 - VAL - forums.x-plane.org  :arrow:  3:07 AM / computer records

http://forums.x-plane.org/


Andres Meneses is into flight simulation as well.  Also, his full name is Andres Meneses Calleja:

http://tinyurl.com/yv2kv7

Is he the same age as Val?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:09:21 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


jeez, that's more boring than Joran's new hobby...


It is, ins't it?  Well, I feel the same way about people who like to look at photos of cars so guess it is the same thing.

But on YouTube note he does have videos if only two of them.  Not very good but vids none the less.

I don't think he is a pilot yet, only a wannabee but in training.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:11:00 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kermit - here's a link to his webshots...still looking for a photo of him

http://tinyurl.com/2n7yz9


His Youtubes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0RRoiYfED0


Oh thank you Klaasend - I had not seen that.

Then it struck me - one of the Oduber son's likes to photograph/video tape planes too. I wonder if they are connected?


So does one of the Arends/Arendz guys.


Who?

Arendz runs a yellow mustang.
and
Max Arrends is in the US going to school

Which one does photography?


The one who is in the USA going to school is my understanding.  Isn't his father the one who dabbles in science?  If so, I believe it is he.  He seems to be a nice looking young man, who did it as a hobby.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:12:11 PM
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote
He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.


Or was he part of a camera crew and/or transport away into sexual slavery?


Well - he is from another country.


"ferries people between countries..."  I wonder what kind of people.  It sounded like tourists, but if you can ferry tourists, you can ferry others.  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:13:17 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Longshot?

Meneses / Valentijn connection?

May 30 - VAL - forums.x-plane.org  :arrow:  3:07 AM / computer records

http://forums.x-plane.org/


Andres Meneses is into flight simulation as well.  Also, his full name is Andres Meneses Calleja:

http://tinyurl.com/yv2kv7

Is he the same age as Val?


Yep, within a year


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:13:50 PM
I wonder what else he photographs?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:14:02 PM
Joran had to leave the casino to go pick up his dad who was flying in.  Huh?  Where was he flying in from?  He was not in Holland with Anita.  Did Joran really leave the casino and go pick up his dad since Joran "is not licensed to drive."  Did he actually leave the casino and pick Paulus up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:14:43 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Kermit"
Quote from: "Rob"
Kermit, who the heck is that guy? And what does he have to do with this case in your opinion?


He is a pilot and photographer.

Trying to find out information about him and why he would be called in for 7 statements to the Aruba investigation.



 Interesting as heck.


Maybe ALE had him go up in his plane and fly around to see what he could see and report back to them  :wink:

Tyler, so glad to see you tonight, my dear  8)


Thanks, Mishy.  I promise to watch my mouth.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 10:15:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Longshot?

Meneses / Valentijn connection?

May 30 - VAL - forums.x-plane.org  :arrow:  3:07 AM / computer records

http://forums.x-plane.org/


Andres Meneses is into flight simulation as well.  Also, his full name is Andres Meneses Calleja:

http://tinyurl.com/yv2kv7


I saw a section with model stunt planes? like radio controlled.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: NM on May 02, 2007, 10:15:43 PM
Hey Monkeys great work tonday!!!!

I wonder if this pilot was needed to move a body off aruba.

For what this info is worth, back in ~1985 I befriended a dutchman living in my area (lol I typed ear.). He was living here flying for a small airport to get enough hours to get his commercial pilot licence.  No one can fly in europe w/out commercial pilot licence, so he had to learn somewhere else.   When his visa expired he moved to St. Maartin and I believe completed his hours there. His goal was/is to fly for KLM dutch airline.

Don't think I'll fly klm ever again if this people mentioned tonight could be future commercial pilots!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 10:16:20 PM
Sounds to me like it was a planned abduction. Deepak was already talkin like NH was all over him..Same with joran the next day..They were already makin plans for a criminal act.

TJ ward said in that interview they tried to take her off the island alive but on the way to the beach something bad happened and they took her body off the island


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:16:59 PM
I don't believe Andres Meneses is a pilot.  He's a kid that is into photographing planes and flight simulation.  He's only 16 or 17 now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rooscrew on May 02, 2007, 10:17:07 PM
Tyler~
So GREAT to see you tonight!!   :D

Roos~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:18:43 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Joran had to leave the casino to go pick up his dad who was flying in.  Huh?  Where was he flying in from?  He was not in Holland with Anita.  Did Joran really leave the casino and go pick up his dad since Joran "is not licensed to drive."  Did he actually leave the casino and pick Paulus up?

Well how could he if he couldn't drive  :roll:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 10:20:01 PM
Hi Monkeys,
Have been lurking and reading.

I used to chat at BFN and there was a kid there can't remember his sign in name. I will have to ask GrannyToad. He was very interested in Natalee and her case. He flew as a student. Sometimes flew to Aruba. Was from some other country, could have been Costa Rico. Do not know if he took photos or not. Always seemed real nice. JMHO

I think the ALE would interview anyone who took photos if they thought it would help there case. I do not think this kid Andre Meneses whether or not he was the poster at BFN or not is involved in something shady. It is interesting he has given so many statements and I would love to read them but again I do not think he is involved in anything shady.

Now what someone could do is email him at the email address he listed and find out what his involvement was. But please do not scare him to death. JMHO

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:20:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Okay, I know you know I'm not arguing - but this is what Kermie just posted  :oops: :

May 10, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

He seems too young.  Could it be this kids father?


One of my kids was flying a piper at that age.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 10:21:19 PM
That x-plane is just a popular plane simulation game..I know alot of people that play that


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 10:22:10 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Okay, I know you know I'm not arguing - but this is what Kermie just posted  :oops: :

May 10, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

He seems too young.  Could it be this kids father?


One of my kids was flying a piper at that age.

Did you fly with him :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:22:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I don't believe Andres Meneses is a pilot.  He's a kid that is into photographing planes and flight simulation.  He's only 16 or 17 now.



Right.  I think he could only fly with a flight instructor on board.  Looks like just one of the kids but this one is in another country?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Observer on May 02, 2007, 10:22:42 PM
Valentijn or whoever was up late posting on the forum


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:22:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Joran had to leave the casino to go pick up his dad who was flying in.  Huh?  Where was he flying in from?  He was not in Holland with Anita.  Did Joran really leave the casino and go pick up his dad since Joran "is not licensed to drive."  Did he actually leave the casino and pick Paulus up?

Well how could he if he couldn't drive  :roll:  :wink:


I believe he drove.  I believe we are being lied to about the driving.  I remember that Charles Croes told us that "the kids at the beach, when I went to the Cabana (sic) said that is Joran's car..."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 10:23:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"

Is he the same age as Val?


Yep, within a year

Interesting. Looking at the computer records i cannot see how Val and Joran could have avoided each other that night. Val logs on to x-plane at 3:07 and Joran says he is home around 3:11.

Yet no PV from Val. Paulus might have denied ALE the right to talk to Val (the system!) forcing them to get info thru the backdoor from Meneses.

Something is fishy with this many PVs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 10:24:18 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Am I looking at the Zorpia site correctly - that he would have been 15 years old in 2006? Can someone that age be a pilot?

He's not a pilot  - his hobby is taking photos of planes


Okay, I know you know I'm not arguing - but this is what Kermie just posted  :oops: :

May 10, 2006 - Andres Meneses, an airoline pilot and photographer gives his 4th interview to Aruba LE.

He seems too young.  Could it be this kids father?


One of my kids was flying a piper at that age.

Did you fly with him :shock:


Yes, actually I trusted him more than most pilots.  I knew how responsible he was and still is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:24:24 PM
Per MF at FOB:

According to Gerold Dompig, that his only worry is that the current team is looking under the same rocks that have already been turned over. He did not go into the details and strategy of the investigation but just the general work that has been done.

This was his biggest case he had in the years as a police officer. He hopes that one day the ALE and Prosecutor's office can come with a solution and give us all some answers. He knew that the latest searches came as a suggestion from the Director of the KLPD last week and that this is not an intervention of the KLPD in the case but a continuum of the investigation.

The investigation never stopped. A team of 15 ALE rechercheurs have been working continuously on the case and just because you do not hear any news, does not mean they are not working.

He underlined the fact that the Dutch authorities were always involved in this case and right now, as requested by them, they are doing a colleagues review of the initial investigation.

There is always what the ALE as investigators want to do, but laws and court and judge's decision might limit that since everybody has their right, but he is glad that this time, the judge and court saw the necessity to expand the search.

He finished by saying that this part of the investigation must not be seen as something individualistic  but as a team effort.

Monkey F.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tiger on May 02, 2007, 10:26:14 PM
when has the law applied to Joran's age or morality.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: the big hammer on May 02, 2007, 10:27:39 PM
Fly Boy Meneses

Klaase writes: I don't believe Andres Meneses is a pilot. He's a kid that is into photographing planes and flight simulation. He's only 16 or 17 now.

Thank you.

Let's get grounded.  The chances that Lil Andres is flying airplanes with human booty on board, or dropping corpses out of cargo doors at Angels 12 in the middle of the nite are very close to zero.

How about that great work spock did this afternoon?  Sure put the lie to deepak's "no sex" claim -- yes?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on May 02, 2007, 10:28:12 PM
Hello Monkeys.

Finally caught up again - you are always more than half a day ahead of me - in posting not in real time.  :lol:

Tyler great to see that lovely rose again.

OK the pilot connection is interesting as opposed to the boat involvement to get kidnapped girls or bodies off the island.  Apart from that this kid may just go along for the ride and take photographs and is it possible he was on the missions of aerial photos for the ALE to help them co-ordinate a search. (Such as it was)

******* - yep it was planned and practiced at least 20 times before.

Tyler and Klaas maybe this was Joran's way of saying he went with whomever was picking up Paulus - most likely the Kalpoe Kab Kompany


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:28:25 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Fly Boy Meneses

Klaase writes: I don't believe Andres Meneses is a pilot. He's a kid that is into photographing planes and flight simulation. He's only 16 or 17 now.

Thank you.

Let's get grounded.  The chances that Lil Andres is flying airplanes with human booty on board, or dropping corpses out of cargo doors at Angels 12 in the middle of the nite are very close to zero.

How about that great work spock did this afternoon?  Sure put the lie to deepak's "no sex" claim -- yes?
.


YEP  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 10:29:17 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Joran had to leave the casino to go pick up his dad who was flying in.  Huh?  Where was he flying in from?  He was not in Holland with Anita.  Did Joran really leave the casino and go pick up his dad since Joran "is not licensed to drive."  Did he actually leave the casino and pick Paulus up?


Tyler, Am I missing something here? Where is that info coming from?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 10:30:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Per MF at FOB:

According to Gerold Dompig, that his only worry is that the current team is looking under the same rocks that have already been turned over. He did not go into the details and strategy of the investigation but just the general work that has been done.

This was his biggest case he had in the years as a police officer. He hopes that one day the ALE and Prosecutor's office can come with a solution and give us all some answers. He knew that the latest searches came as a suggestion from the Director of the KLPD last week and that this is not an intervention of the KLPD in the case but a continuum of the investigation.

The investigation never stopped. A team of 15 ALE rechercheurs have been working continuously on the case and just because you do not hear any news, does not mean they are not working.

He underlined the fact that the Dutch authorities were always involved in this case and right now, as requested by them, they are doing a colleagues review of the initial investigation.

There is always what the ALE as investigators want to do, but laws and court and judge's decision might limit that since everybody has their right, but he is glad that this time, the judge and court saw the necessity to expand the search.

He finished by saying that this part of the investigation must not be seen as something individualistic  but as a team effort.

Monkey F.


 :lol:  :lol: :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:31:26 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Joran had to leave the casino to go pick up his dad who was flying in.  Huh?  Where was he flying in from?  He was not in Holland with Anita.  Did Joran really leave the casino and go pick up his dad since Joran "is not licensed to drive."  Did he actually leave the casino and pick Paulus up?


Tyler, Am I missing something here? Where is that info coming from?


In the beginning of the case it was said Joran went to pick up his dad at the airport.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:31:48 PM
So what does this guy have to do with anything?  Any ideas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:32:58 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"

Is he the same age as Val?


Yep, within a year

Interesting. Looking at the computer records i cannot see how Val and Joran could have avoided each other that night. Val logs on to x-plane at 3:07 and Joran says he is home around 3:11.

Yet no PV from Val. Paulus might have denied ALE the right to talk to Val (the system!) forcing them to get info thru the backdoor from Meneses.

Something is fishy with this many PVs.



Sounds like the most reasonable idea so far.  Was he in contact with Val that night.

There  is one time segment when both Joran and Val are logged on to the computer, too.  How can that be?  Can't do that on mine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:35:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what does this guy have to do with anything?  Any ideas?


We really don't know.  Maybe he was playing a flight simulation game with Val?  Maybe he took some photos they wanted info on.  We don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 10:36:38 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"

Is he the same age as Val?


Yep, within a year

Interesting. Looking at the computer records i cannot see how Val and Joran could have avoided each other that night. Val logs on to x-plane at 3:07 and Joran says he is home around 3:11.

Yet no PV from Val. Paulus might have denied ALE the right to talk to Val (the system!) forcing them to get info thru the backdoor from Meneses.

Something is fishy with this many PVs.


Interesting igsigs


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:37:59 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Fly Boy Meneses

Klaase writes: I don't believe Andres Meneses is a pilot. He's a kid that is into photographing planes and flight simulation. He's only 16 or 17 now.

Thank you.

Let's get grounded.  The chances that Lil Andres is flying airplanes with human booty on board, or dropping corpses out of cargo doors at Angels 12 in the middle of the nite are very close to zero.

How about that great work spock did this afternoon?  Sure put the lie to deepak's "no sex" claim -- yes?

.



HAMMER,

Is not Deepak saying he said that to mess up the investigation not far more significant than his claim that Natalee put her hand down his pants?

How did he know the same night she disappeared that there was going to be an investigation unless he had committed a crime to investigate.

He makes it sound like Natalee was aggressive to him sexually, too, so not sure that is incriminating on the part of Deepak.  Very odd claim or thing for him to think.

But for me it is the fact he was creating an alibi the minute he got home from their misadventure.  He knew a crime had been committed almost in real time posted it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: BTgirl on May 02, 2007, 10:38:49 PM
Night monkeys. Let's hope for good things tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:38:57 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:39:26 PM
Nite BTGirl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 10:42:41 PM
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 10:43:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


According to Gerold Dompig, that his only worry is that the current team is looking under the same rocks that have already been turned over. He did not go into the details and strategy of the investigation but just the general work that has been done.
.



Oh boy, words of wisdom from the old pro who got booted off the case because he lied and took four months to do a search. Tell us more, Gerold.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:43:46 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 10:44:05 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Hi Monkeys,
Have been lurking and reading.

I used to chat at BFN and there was a kid there can't remember his sign in name. I will have to ask GrannyToad. He was very interested in Natalee and her case. He flew as a student. Sometimes flew to Aruba. Was from some other country, could have been Costa Rico. Do not know if he took photos or not. Always seemed real nice. JMHO

I think the ALE would interview anyone who took photos if they thought it would help there case. I do not think this kid Andre Meneses whether or not he was the poster at BFN or not is involved in something shady. It is interesting he has given so many statements and I would love to read them but again I do not think he is involved in anything shady.

Now what someone could do is email him at the email address he listed and find out what his involvement was. But please do not scare him to death. JMHO

Sam


It was Juan and he was from Venezuela. He was always very nice in chat but so was Fred.  :shock:  :lol:

http://everwoodmusic.com/forum/post-21196.html&highlight=#21196


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 10:45:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what does this guy have to do with anything?  Any ideas?


We really don't know.  Maybe he was playing a flight simulation game with Val?  Maybe he took some photos they wanted info on.  We don't know.

Could Val have been signed on from Holland.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 10:45:38 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Interesting igsigs

I know the data on this is thin Rob. But this x-plane site is right up Meneses' alley. And i was going over the comp records recently so that was the first thing that popped into my mind.

Another thing i noticed is that VAL is not on the computer all night but jumps on right after the 8 minute phone call from Joran to Deepak. In the early AM...on a school night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:46:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
So what does this guy have to do with anything?  Any ideas?


We really don't know.  Maybe he was playing a flight simulation game with Val?  Maybe he took some photos they wanted info on.  We don't know.

Could Val have been signed on from Holland.

Yes, he could have


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:47:08 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Rob"
Interesting igsigs

I know the data on this is thin Rob. But this x-plane site is right up Meneses' alley. And i was going over the comp records recently so that was the first thing that popped into my mind.

Another thing i noticed is that VAL is not on the computer all night but jumps on right after the 8 minute phone call from Joran to Deepak. In the early AM...on a school night?


One of the links I found for Meneses is an x-plane simulator discussion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:48:28 PM
that night JORAN was VAL  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 10:49:14 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


According to Gerold Dompig, that his only worry is that the current team is looking under the same rocks that have already been turned over. He did not go into the details and strategy of the investigation but just the general work that has been done.
.



Oh boy, words of wisdom from the old pro who got booted off the case because he lied and took four months to do a search. Tell us more, Gerold.


Please Dayhiker, do not criticize him too much, he'll need a 5 day mental vacation if you hurt his feelings...

All that from a man that thinks he's got the cajones to run an anti-terrorism security force.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 10:51:22 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Rob"
Interesting igsigs

I know the data on this is thin Rob. But this x-plane site is right up Meneses' alley. And i was going over the comp records recently so that was the first thing that popped into my mind.

Another thing i noticed is that VAL is not on the computer all night but jumps on right after the 8 minute phone call from Joran to Deepak. In the early AM...on a school night?



That is a little too coincidental Igsigs. How do we know it was Val on the computer? They could have used his password.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 10:52:01 PM
Quote from: "robots"
that night JORAN was VAL  8)

He was switching screen names.  I know my sisters password and can access her email.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 10:52:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
One of the links I found for Meneses is an x-plane simulator discussion.

Klaas sees all!!! :lol:

Ever hear of any of the pimps being interested in aviation/games? Freddy, Joran, Sander? Does not have to be Val on the comp.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 10:52:54 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Rob"
Interesting igsigs

I know the data on this is thin Rob. But this x-plane site is right up Meneses' alley. And i was going over the comp records recently so that was the first thing that popped into my mind.

Another thing i noticed is that VAL is not on the computer all night but jumps on right after the 8 minute phone call from Joran to Deepak. In the early AM...on a school night?


igisgs, the answers to the case have been in the cell, text, computer and land line records. This is not that complicated, unless they can't connect the dots.

Hammer, knows more about that 8 minute call.. that was the longest call ever between Joran and Deepak if I remember what KJ said about that call.. and I think I have that correct.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:53:27 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
that night JORAN was VAL  8)

He was switching screen names.  I know my sisters password and can access her email.


yep


i can be 5 different people

at the same time if i wanted to  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 10:54:26 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"


According to Gerold Dompig, that his only worry is that the current team is looking under the same rocks that have already been turned over. He did not go into the details and strategy of the investigation but just the general work that has been done.
.



Oh boy, words of wisdom from the old pro who got booted off the case because he lied and took four months to do a search. Tell us more, Gerold.


Please Dayhiker, do not criticize him too much, he'll need a 5 day mental vacation if you hurt his feelings...

All that from a man that thinks he's got the cajones to run an anti-terrorism security force.  :D



LOL Rob, this is the louse who got railroaded off the case after the Dutch fried his butt. You'd think he's want to keep his trap shut. But thet never was his forte.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 10:54:32 PM
Quote from: "vms"


It was Juan and he was from Venezuela. He was always very nice in chat but so was Fred.  :shock:  :lol:

http://everwoodmusic.com/forum/post-21196.html&highlight=#21196


Thanks VMS for remembering that. Juan was the name that came to my mind as well but was not positive. Was Fred from Venezuela as well?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 10:54:45 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
One of the links I found for Meneses is an x-plane simulator discussion.

Klaas sees all!!! :lol:

Ever hear of any of the pimps being interested in aviation/games? Freddy, Joran, Sander? Does not have to be Val on the comp.

Not off the top of my head but I know that one of the Arends (z) was into it.  Don't remember which one now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:55:32 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
that night JORAN was VAL  8)

He was switching screen names.  I know my sisters password and can access her email.


There is still a time over lap.  I wonder if they have something like two accounts.  OK ALE would only check and look for one.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 10:56:54 PM
remember the 4 wheeler ???
was it guido's they took ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 10:58:16 PM
Good chance Paulus was NOT HOME that night. IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:58:29 PM
Quote from: "robots"
remember the 4 wheeler ???
was it guido's they took ??


quad racer...same thing...'nother name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 10:58:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 10:58:43 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Rob"
Interesting igsigs

I know the data on this is thin Rob. But this x-plane site is right up Meneses' alley. And i was going over the comp records recently so that was the first thing that popped into my mind.

Another thing i noticed is that VAL is not on the computer all night but jumps on right after the 8 minute phone call from Joran to Deepak. In the early AM...on a school night?


igisgs, the answers to the case have been in the cell, text, computer and land line records. This is not that complicated, unless they can't connect the dots.

Hammer, knows more about that 8 minute call.. that was the longest call ever between Joran and Deepak if I remember what KJ said about that call.. and I think I have that correct.


They had an internet plan in place very quickly. How do the phone calls match up to the internet activity timewise?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: vms on May 02, 2007, 10:59:08 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "vms"


It was Juan and he was from Venezuela. He was always very nice in chat but so was Fred.  :shock:  :lol:

http://everwoodmusic.com/forum/post-21196.html&highlight=#21196


Thanks VMS for remembering that. Juan was the name that came to my mind as well but was not positive. Was Fred from Venezuela as well?


Noooooooooo

Totally different story, not related at all. I was just using that as an example of how people are not always as they seem. Sorry, I thought you were there when Fred was raised from the dead... 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 10:59:16 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Good chance Paulus was NOT HOME that night. IMO


Where was Paulus?  At a party?  Waiting for the prize?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 10:59:32 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:00:18 PM
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "vms"


It was Juan and he was from Venezuela. He was always very nice in chat but so was Fred.  :shock:  :lol:

http://everwoodmusic.com/forum/post-21196.html&highlight=#21196


Thanks VMS for remembering that. Juan was the name that came to my mind as well but was not positive. Was Fred from Venezuela as well?


Noooooooooo

Totally different story, not related at all. I was just using that as an example of how people are not always as they seem. Sorry, I thought you were there when Fred was raised from the dead... 8)

I wasn't there but I watched it transpire.  Unbelievable


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:00:25 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
remember the 4 wheeler ???
was it guido's they took ??


quad racer...same thing...'nother name.


yea, thats the one


what you think is up with that?

i have a little theory

but anxious to hear others also


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 11:00:29 PM
Klaas,

Was that Larissa friend of Jorans, the one on the boat and the one in the shower, from Puerto Rico?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:01:19 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:02:00 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,

Was that Larissa friend of Jorans, the one on the boat and the one in the shower, from Puerto Rico?

.


I think Costa Rica which is where Andres is from as well.  Not Puerto Rico.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:02:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:



good job anita and paulus

way to keep your eyes on JORAN  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:03:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:



Yes they did say that, and it was in the main residence. The very place the judge wouldn't allow searched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 11:04:06 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,

Was that Larissa friend of Jorans, the one on the boat and the one in the shower, from Puerto Rico?

.


I think Costa Rica which is where Andres is from as well.  Not Puerto Rico.


Yeah, that's what I was trying to say, Costa Rica not Puerto Rico.  I wonder if she is friends with this guy as well.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 11:04:15 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Good chance Paulus was NOT HOME that night. IMO


Where was Paulus?  At a party?  Waiting for the prize?

Kids up/out all night? School night. Watching porn in the main house at 4am? Paulus could have been somewhere that he would not want Anita to know about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:04:26 PM
I have often wondered about them taking Guido's quad racer.  Seems to me they had a reason for doing so.  An all terrain vehicle is the perfect mode of transportation for that island considering all the sand.  I would like to know the date that happened and then see who they questioned just before they took it.   Someone either saw something and talked or heard something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 11:05:06 PM
I just got an email.. its not the first one I recieved in the last few days?
 I don't think I even know who sent it?   If it is someone here. and I do not recoginized your email I aplogize.

 But I am gonna share the photos they sent.. I just loaded them.
 IN the subject line of the email it said

Emailing: images Andres Meneses

and these 3 photos were in the email.
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/thn_avc_00005889.jpg)

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/thn_avc_00004926.jpg)
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/andresMidsize.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:05:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Klaas,

Was that Larissa friend of Jorans, the one on the boat and the one in the shower, from Puerto Rico?

.


I think Costa Rica which is where Andres is from as well.  Not Puerto Rico.


Yep, Costa Rica - here's her myspace:

http://tinyurl.com/2yosy4


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:05:30 PM
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:06:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:


I have a laptop in my closet...unless you look for it...you won't see it at all.  They had time to hide things remember.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:06:32 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have often wondered about them taking Guido's quad racer.  Seems to me they had a reason for doing so.  An all terrain vehicle is the perfect mode of transportation for that island considering all the sand.  I would like to know the date that happened and then see who they questioned just before they took it.   Someone either saw something and talked or heard something.



CLAP CLAP CLAP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:06:45 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:07:41 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:


I have a laptop in my closet...unless you look for it...you won't see it at all.  They had time to hide things remember.


were getting closer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 11:08:21 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Good chance Paulus was NOT HOME that night. IMO


Where was Paulus?  At a party?  Waiting for the prize?

Kids up/out all night? School night. Watching porn in the main house at 4am? Paulus could have been somewhere that he would not want Anita to know about.



Was he somewhere near the racuet club, maybe a condo in that area?  Was that why they were in that area?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:08:51 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.


course he did, (had his won )

he wasnt doing all the PIMPING online with the FAMILY COMPUTER

another LIE by the sloots   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 11:09:02 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.

Me too. Very, very hard to believe Joran was not delicious enough to rate a computer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:09:02 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.


Joran had his own apartment...he had his own computer.  I'm not Robots. I just answer his email.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:09:28 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:


I have a laptop in my closet...unless you look for it...you won't see it at all.  They had time to hide things remember.


were getting closer



Here's a familiy that flies back and forth to Holland at will. And they can't spend 500 bucks to buy Joran a computer? Ain't buying.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 11:09:52 PM
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:10:06 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.


Joran had his own apartment...he had his own computer.  I'm not Robots. I just answer his email.  :lol:


LALA

that was funny   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 11:10:11 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
that night JORAN was VAL  8)

He was switching screen names.  I know my sisters password and can access her email.


Suppose Val was the main ID on the computer.  I am the main ID on this one.  If I click on and want to sign on as me, I do nothing.  Memory password.  If DH is going to use it, he has to go through the password business, but he could just jump on it and use it with my password if he did not want to go through that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Anna on May 02, 2007, 11:10:50 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
I just got an email.. its not the first one I recieved in the last few days?
 I don't think I even know who sent it?   If it is someone here. and I do not recoginized your email I aplogize.

 But I am gonna share the photos they sent.. I just loaded them.
 IN the subject line of the email it said

Emailing: images Andres Meneses

and these 3 photos were in the email.
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/thn_avc_00005889.jpg)

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/thn_avc_00004926.jpg)
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/andresMidsize.jpg)




So how do we know which one was questioned?  I wonder if this older one lives in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:11:27 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 11:11:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
One of the links I found for Meneses is an x-plane simulator discussion.

Klaas sees all!!! :lol:

Ever hear of any of the pimps being interested in aviation/games? Freddy, Joran, Sander? Does not have to be Val on the comp.

Not off the top of my head but I know that one of the Arends (z) was into it.  Don't remember which one now.


Max, the one who is in Florida now, and his father is into science/aviation, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:11:44 PM
K2 had their own computers


but but but LITTLE RICH PUNK JORAN didnt


BS

LOAD ALERT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:13:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.


Please don't tell me that Julia said that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:13:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.



They bought him that one to replace the one they had to ditch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:13:53 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.



They bought him that one to replace the one they had to ditch.



BINGO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 11:14:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "vms"


It was Juan and he was from Venezuela. He was always very nice in chat but so was Fred.  :shock:  :lol:

http://everwoodmusic.com/forum/post-21196.html&highlight=#21196


Thanks VMS for remembering that. Juan was the name that came to my mind as well but was not positive. Was Fred from Venezuela as well?


Noooooooooo

Totally different story, not related at all. I was just using that as an example of how people are not always as they seem. Sorry, I thought you were there when Fred was raised from the dead... 8)

I wasn't there but I watched it transpire.  Unbelievable


Oh my, No I did not know any of this. I do remember fred dying, I did not know he came back to life. I seem to remember people sending sympathy to his wife. Why would someone do that. Fake death I mean.

No one wants to take me up on my suggestion of writing a nice email to Andres without scaring him to death.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 11:14:28 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.


"We went to Joran's apartment.  He was doing homework on his computer.  We left for C&Cs."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:14:39 PM
Quote from: "robots"
K2 had their own computers


but but but LITTLE RICH PUNK JORAN didnt


BS

LOAD ALERT



Let's hope KLPD is smart enough to go through the Sloot's past purchase history to see how many computers they've bought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 11:14:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:

Yes and when they make it a point to volunteer certain information we know it is a lie.  I always said they had more than one computer.

Joran - Laptop.
Paulus - Laptop.
2 Boys - Desktop.

Joran always gets what he wants.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 11:15:00 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.



They bought him that one to replace the one they had to ditch.


That immediately sprang to my mind too ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:15:45 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.



They bought him that one to replace the one they had to ditch.


You mean the one they had to SLOOT, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: sb on May 02, 2007, 11:15:55 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"

Here's a family that flies back and forth to Holland at will. And they can't spend 500 bucks to buy Joran a computer? Ain't buying.


Classic Post Of The Night

Why none of us have thought of this, I don't know.

Joran had a LAPTOP he was using by the pool. I find it hard to believe that it didn't have an Internet connection, I suppose maybe it's POSSIBLE that they don't sell network cards on Aruba LOL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:17:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.



They bought him that one to replace the one they had to ditch.


You mean the one they had to SLOOT, lol  :lol:



Right! Say, you think Joran's lappy was in that gym bag?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 11:17:38 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "robots"
i have 4 computers in the house

4 people can be on at the same time


if need be i can 4 different robots at the same time  8)



I find it hard to believe Joran didn't have his own computer, Robots.

Me too. Very, very hard to believe Joran was not delicious enough to rate a computer.


igsigs, what's he doing... doing loading porn in the family dining area? look at the lay out of the house. It can only be located in one place if in fact they only have one computer.
first, its not in his flat. Thats eliminated.
second, it's not in the part of the house where Anita, Paulus, and the two other kids live. Thats eliminated.
third, it could only be in the part of the house where the pictures of all of them eating. Or another room in the part of the house.

The sloot house is three different units, counting Jorans dog house.

He's not downloading porn in the kitchen or family room. Unless thats standard at Anita's house. His dad did give him a DVD player with complimentary porn as you recall.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:18:19 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Well, there's that pool pix of Joran with a laptop ...

Yes but that was a Christmas gift I believe..or so they said.



They bought him that one to replace the one they had to ditch.


You mean the one they had to SLOOT, lol  :lol:



Right! Say, you think Joran's lappy was in that gym bag?


Could have been


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Rob on May 02, 2007, 11:18:25 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"

Here's a family that flies back and forth to Holland at will. And they can't spend 500 bucks to buy Joran a computer? Ain't buying.


Classic Post Of The Night

Why none of us have thought of this, I don't know.

Joran had a LAPTOP he was using by the pool. I find it hard to believe that it didn't have an Internet connection, I suppose maybe it's POSSIBLE that they don't sell network cards on Aruba LOL.


he got that for Christmas 2005 after getting outta jail.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: sb on May 02, 2007, 11:19:24 PM
Some laptops have the HD in a caddy and it can be replaced easily. They would not have to ditch the whole PC, just a HD.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:20:04 PM
SLOOT LIVING ROOM


JORAN    "HI PAULUS"    he called him paulus i think


PAULUS      "hello joran "


ANITA         "hello delicious sporter"


JORAN         "hi Momma"


JORAN         "im just gonna LOAD up some porn on MY  websites
and then send some PORN videos to my GANGSTA PALS,, and then GAMBLE a little ONLINE......you dont mind do you... dont worry i will keep the REAL HAR CORE stuff away from the younger kidsOH PAUL pass me a cold one would you please"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 11:21:32 PM
Joran may have had a school-issued laptop at the time. That's not unusual here, esp. in private schools.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:22:21 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"

Here's a family that flies back and forth to Holland at will. And they can't spend 500 bucks to buy Joran a computer? Ain't buying.


Classic Post Of The Night

Why none of us have thought of this, I don't know.

Joran had a LAPTOP he was using by the pool. I find it hard to believe that it didn't have an Internet connection, I suppose maybe it's POSSIBLE that they don't sell network cards on Aruba LOL.



If I were KLPD I'd be looking for a missing computer, or at least the records of one being purchased.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: crazymom on May 02, 2007, 11:22:31 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazymom"
OT ALERT!!!!  Klaas and CBB, Can one of you help me with a graphic for t-shirts for the Vigil I am planning for Jaycee Hardin?  Please with sugar on top!!!  Klaas I will send you an email and you can work on it or see if CBB can.  I will give the details later.  TIA.


Sure, just email me.


Thanks.  I need to go to the store so it will be later tonight!!


Oh, I forgot my manners!  Hey Monkeys!  I will see you soon!
Good luck with Jaycee's vigil!

Thanks Elaine.  I hope it remains peaceful and my butt doesn't get thrown in jail. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on May 02, 2007, 11:22:57 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
I just got an email.. its not the first one I recieved in the last few days?
 I don't think I even know who sent it?   If it is someone here. and I do not recoginized your email I aplogize.

 But I am gonna share the photos they sent.. I just loaded them.
 IN the subject line of the email it said

Emailing: images Andres Meneses

and these 3 photos were in the email.
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/thn_avc_00005889.jpg)

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/thn_avc_00004926.jpg)
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/andresMidsize.jpg)




So how do we know which one was questioned?  I wonder if this older one lives in Aruba?

  Anna.. I have NO idea who sent this to me..  They have sent 2 others emails as well.. and  thse folks dont know who it is either? I have written back to this person.. and asked who they are.. and dont get a response. I did thank them for the pics.  Its REALLY strange.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 11:23:03 PM
Forget about emailing the kid.

I believe with the pictures Angie just posted we have the real Andre Meneses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 11:23:23 PM
I am intrigued by Angie's email with those pictures.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on May 02, 2007, 11:23:47 PM
Just a quick run by, I can't stay.  Klaas and CBB , see lounge.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:24:25 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Forget about emailing the kid.

I believe with the pictures Angie just posted we have the real Andre Meneses.

I disagree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:24:27 PM
4 wheeler was used to get rid of things in the MIDDLE of the night
not a body, but other things


DRIVE out in the middle of NOWHERE


cops cant catch you anyway......... they are too fast

NOT that i would know this from personal experience  :twisted:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

ok ok ok.. im coming clean we were 18 and fishing without a license

we got away   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Dayhiker on May 02, 2007, 11:25:26 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:

Yes and when they make it a point to volunteer certain information we know it is a lie.  I always said they had more than one computer.

Joran - Laptop.
Paulus - Laptop.
2 Boys - Desktop.

Joran always gets what he wants.



Joran's computer and Sander's cell phone are probably in the same hole somewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:25:48 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
Anna I think if you do networking you can have 2 people on at the same time. Klaas or anyone do you know?


But according to PVDS there was only one computer in the house at the time.



You don't suppose they held out a whole computer on ALE do you???

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:



Or ALE held out a computer on the investigation.

Didn't they make a point of saying they only had the one PC in the family room so they could monitor the boys PC use  :roll:  :roll:

Yes and when they make it a point to volunteer certain information we know it is a lie.  I always said they had more than one computer.

Joran - Laptop.
Paulus - Laptop.
2 Boys - Desktop.

Joran always gets what he wants.



Joran's computer and Sander's cell phone are probably in the same hole somewhere.


YEP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:26:07 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
I am intrigued by Angie's email with those pictures.

I'm not.  Who ever that person is that emailed Angie has been emailing me too.  Mostly with info that has already been posted.  I asked who the person was and they don't respond.  Therefore, I don't trust the information sent.  

Everthing I found on Andres Meneses leads to someone who is a young kid who is into photographing planes and into flight simulation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: msmarple on May 02, 2007, 11:26:10 PM
robots - Tetnus shot all over with? Did you get the lady doctor?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: robots on May 02, 2007, 11:28:01 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
robots - Tetnus shot all over with? Did you get the lady doctor?  :lol:


yea, it was sore but better now    thanks !


yea i got the lady


she said .....you have bones like IRON

and i said yep, thats me  8)  :twisted:


i started to write ROBOTS  where you put your name on the paperwork  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: sb on May 02, 2007, 11:28:20 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"


Joran's computer and Sander's cell phone are probably in the same hole somewhere.


A big, wet hole called the Caribbean Sea.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on May 02, 2007, 11:28:50 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
that night JORAN was VAL  8)

He was switching screen names.  I know my sisters password and can access her email.


Suppose Val was the main ID on the computer.  I am the main ID on this one.  If I click on and want to sign on as me, I do nothing.  Memory password.  If DH is going to use it, he has to go through the password business, but he could just jump on it and use it with my password if he did not want to go through that.


When Klaas posted the link to the myspace site a while ago, I clicked on it.  I was looking around and clicked on that guy's pics and lo and behold!  I was suddenly on my daughter's myspace info and it said I had to log in to view.  My computer remembers that stuff and when I tried to access a myspace it just assumed I was her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: San on May 02, 2007, 11:29:00 PM
Quote from: "Dayhiker"
Quote from: "San"

Yes and when they make it a point to volunteer certain information we know it is a lie.  I always said they had more than one computer.

Joran - Laptop.
Paulus - Laptop.
2 Boys - Desktop.

Joran always gets what he wants.


Joran's computer and Sander's cell phone are probably in the same hole somewhere.

Yes they are.  The ALE was nervous about his computer records and what was downloaded.  They probably knew he didn't erase those files and even if he did they could still trace things.  They had to make sure that computer was gone without a trace.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tylergal on May 02, 2007, 11:29:46 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Joran may have had a school-issued laptop at the time. That's not unusual here, esp. in private schools.
:shock:  Private school, personal lap top! :shock:   They expect you to buy that in private school.  Maybe in gubmint schools, you get it off the back of the taxpayer or Bill Gates.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: sb on May 02, 2007, 11:30:15 PM
Saving a thought on the 4-wheeler and evidence disposal for the next thread.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: the big hammer on May 02, 2007, 11:31:02 PM
Sloot House: Wifi Hot Spot?

jvds operating hi-end Dell laptop in photo post Natalee --

When did they subscribe to Wifi?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: igsigs on May 02, 2007, 11:31:10 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Saving a thought on the 4-wheeler and evidence disposal for the next thread.

Bump  :arrow:  50


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:31:33 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Sloot House: Wifi Hot Spot?

jvds operating hi-end Dell laptop in photo post Natalee --

When did they subscribe to Wifi?

.


Good question Hammer


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on May 02, 2007, 11:31:41 PM
THE COMPUTER
Anita Van der Sloot
On the Record w/ Greta
June 24, 2005


VAN SUSTEREN: What has been seized from this house?

A. VAN DER SLOOT: The first time it was one computer that we all use. There's no lock on it so we can see what the kids are doing, one laptop of my husband that he only uses for his work, my digital camera what was on my desk, not in Joran's room on my desk. And I just had a field trip with middle-schoolers and I took pictures of a sand sculpturing project that we were doing because I'm an art teacher and there were like maybe 20, 25 pictures on it and I told the police, listen, this is material I want to use for school but for the rest there's nothing on it. You can look at it but they took that too.

They took all kind of things from Joran, a little kind of an MP3 player. They took tapes, also a tape of his tennis, college tennis camp. And the second time they took — they did a house searching, the garden, the pool. They took the two cars.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: AZLady on May 02, 2007, 11:32:19 PM
Hi Monkeys.  What's new?  Any news today?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: sb on May 02, 2007, 11:32:32 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "sb"
Saving a thought on the 4-wheeler and evidence disposal for the next thread.

Bump  :arrow:  50


That too, igsigs.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: Sam on May 02, 2007, 11:33:26 PM
As slow as I am this post will probably not go through.
When Kermit posted the link to the Menses airplane photography the other night. It was very clear they were very professional. Not just a passing interest. Kermit also had the person listed as a pilot as well as a photographer. I do not know where Kermit got this info but do trust it.
JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #611 5/1 - 5/2/2007
Post by: klaasend on May 02, 2007, 11:33:47 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 612

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1114