Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 03:16:13 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 03:16:13 PM
Let's hope 2007 brings Justice for Natalee

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/candleman2justice2007.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 05:50:47 PM
:twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 05:52:38 PM
8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 05:52:39 PM
CHEATERRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr   :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:00:15 PM
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 06:00:58 PM
I'm in...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:04:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:04:57 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:08:24 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


Who knows.  I see Dugo at RU is trying to set them straight on the difference between the Foundations and the Reward funds.  At least someone has some knowledge.  These people are unbelievable!

Also, did you notice SandraK is now back at FOB in full force?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:09:47 PM
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:11:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


Who knows.  I see Dugo at RU is trying to set them straight on the difference between the Foundations and the Reward funds.  At least someone has some knowledge.  These people are unbelievable!

Also, did you notice SandraK is now back at FOB in full force?


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:11:52 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D

They must all be posting in their "hidey hole"  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 02, 2007, 06:12:13 PM
Just a drive by, Dana, to thank you, Red, Klass, Tom, Mrs. Red, et al, for all you do.  Happy to see you are having the Ph.D. mindprint fellow on.  Please test him for us so we can know if he is the real deal.  Get him to read SandraKs posts and if he can figure that out what she talks about or to whom, I think he can find Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:12:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D

They must all be posting in their "hidey hole"  :wink:


yep :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:12:52 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:13:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D

They must all be posting in their "hidey hole"  :wink:


passing around the CRANK PIPE  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:15:10 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:15:19 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D

They must all be posting in their "hidey hole"  :wink:


passing around the CRANK PIPE  8)


I wouldn't doubt that!! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:15:32 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:



 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:15:56 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


you are a HOOT  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:16:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D

They must all be posting in their "hidey hole"  :wink:


 we need a hidey hole   :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:16:29 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


you are a HOOT  8)


whcih means you are funny

funny is good  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:16:57 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..40 posters online at FOB and looks like SandraK is the only one posting and talking to herself at that. :D

They must all be posting in their "hidey hole"  :wink:


 we need a hidey hole   :twisted:



hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:17:30 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Would you two just go get a room...lol...I saw that posted at FOB this morning..I am just kidding Angie and Robots but thought it was funny. :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:17:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


Who knows.  I see Dugo at RU is trying to set them straight on the difference between the Foundations and the Reward funds.  At least someone has some knowledge.  These people are unbelievable!

Also, did you notice SandraK is now back at FOB in full force?


I skimmed through some of that FOB and RU stuff about the reward.  Jan(MedleyRelay) B. and Roger are trying to cast doubt in the minds of others about the reward.  They have also made claims that can't be confirmed.  Have any of them even attempted to verify anything, or did they expect someone to come to them with the details?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:18:02 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:



you are a HOOT  8)




 :wink:    :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:18:04 PM
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:19:18 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


Who knows.  I see Dugo at RU is trying to set them straight on the difference between the Foundations and the Reward funds.  At least someone has some knowledge.  These people are unbelievable!

Also, did you notice SandraK is now back at FOB in full force?


I skimmed through some of that FOB and RU stuff about the reward.  Jan(MedleyRelay) B. and Roger are trying to cast doubt in the minds of others about the reward.  They have also made claims that can't be confirmed.  Have any of them even attempted to verify anything, or did they expect someone to come to them with the details?


EASY - it's their latest talking point is all.  They are FOS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:19:33 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Would you two just go get a room...lol...I saw that posted at FOB this morning..I am just kidding Angie and Robots but thought it was funny. :P



LOL

youre funny too :) 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:19:35 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Would you two just go get a room...lol...I saw that posted at FOB this morning..I am just kidding Angie and Robots but thought it was funny. :P


  ROFL  Gel  its ok! I have a great sense of humor!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:19:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:20:20 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Would you two just go get a room...lol...I saw that posted at FOB this morning..I am just kidding Angie and Robots but thought it was funny. :P




im a robots.......what do i need a room for

i sleep standing up
i dont need a bed   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:20:30 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Would you two just go get a room...lol...I saw that posted at FOB this morning..I am just kidding Angie and Robots but thought it was funny. :P


  ROFL  Gel  its ok! I have a great sense of humor!!  :)


I knew that 8) but what about Robots?? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:21:40 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


Who knows.  I see Dugo at RU is trying to set them straight on the difference between the Foundations and the Reward funds.  At least someone has some knowledge.  These people are unbelievable!

Also, did you notice SandraK is now back at FOB in full force?


I skimmed through some of that FOB and RU stuff about the reward.  Jan(MedleyRelay) B. and Roger are trying to cast doubt in the minds of others about the reward.  They have also made claims that can't be confirmed.  Have any of them even attempted to verify anything, or did they expect someone to come to them with the details?



its the LATEST

"lets look any anythng else EXCEPT JORAN AND PAULUS the KILLERS"


routine BULL CRAP from HATE MONGERS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:21:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


  Klaas  LOL LOL  ! Are you her sistah?   :wink:  You got Sandra Speak down pat..  :wink:   <she really has never done a thing to me.. always has been nice..>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:22:32 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
I'm in...


  LOL

Darn Robots sneaks in here and cheats and leaves,.. what a snot!  :wink:


i wub you  8)


 Aweeeeeeeeeeee I love yah too..  8)  been awhile since someone told me they loved me.. LOL   :wink:


Would you two just go get a room...lol...I saw that posted at FOB this morning..I am just kidding Angie and Robots but thought it was funny. :P


  ROFL  Gel  its ok! I have a great sense of humor!!  :)


I knew that 8) but what about Robots?? :wink:



ROFL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:23:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - it's their latest talking point is all.  They are FOS.


I know, but I still think they should be sent to Aruba and put in KIA until they squealed like piggies.   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:24:03 PM
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:24:11 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


  Klaas  LOL LOL  ! Are you her sistah?   :wink:  You got Sandra Speak down pat..  :wink:   <she really has never done a thing to me.. always has been nice..>

Well Angie, she hasn't been as nice to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:26:47 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


I think Roger has been all over the map on this case.  The stranger the theory the more he likes it.  What is his name?  Sam something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:26:51 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


Roger started out as a self described someone that only wanted the facts.  Then he started providing information to Julia Renfro and ALE.  Then he started that letter to Oprah regarding the Dr. Phil show and the Skeeters tape.

Then...he seemed to have a change of mind and started posting at BFN.  He stopped posting at Scrux and shut down the forum for a while.  Medlelyrelay got pissed at him because it appeared he felt that Joran was guilty.

No way to verify if this person posting with the name of "Roger" is really Roger.  Who knows, it could be JR Dutch Attorney?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:30:33 PM
Klaas I remember what Easy said and this guy Roger said he was Sam something,but you are right there's no way to tell who he really is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Hotshot on June 02, 2007, 06:31:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


  Klaas  LOL LOL  ! Are you her sistah?   :wink:  You got Sandra Speak down pat..  :wink:   <she really has never done a thing to me.. always has been nice..>

Well Angie, she hasn't been as nice to me.

Me either


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:33:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


  Klaas  LOL LOL  ! Are you her sistah?   :wink:  You got Sandra Speak down pat..  :wink:   <she really has never done a thing to me.. always has been nice..>

Well Angie, she hasn't been as nice to me.



:( Klaas.. I have read some of others postings.. and I know you get shitty emails.. and I do not know WHY on earth anyone would be nasty with you. You have always been NOTHING but nice since I have posted with you in the last 2 years..even before you became a mod.  Screw the meany asswipes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:33:47 PM
Angie

I wub you  :D (It had been a long time since anyone told you, and now it's been twice in one day.)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:35:50 PM
I'm feelin' the wub tonight.......

Has everyone else seen Dream Girls?  I watched that this afternoon instead of taking my nap.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:36:14 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


I think Roger has been all over the map on this case.  The stranger the theory the more he likes it.  What is his name?  Sam something?


 Oh dang.. yes it is Sam.. and I have a pic of him.. I wont post it on the forum though.
he also is JON..  :roll:  IIRC he posts at BFN too I was told but I cant read there. so I dunno?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:36:16 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Angie

I wub you  :D (It had been a long time since anyone told you, and now it's been twice in one day.)  :wink:


Well damn,I feel left out now. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:37:27 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I can just see it now :wink:

Moonshadows:  SandraK, would you mind roboposting on the open forum for a few hours while we talk business in our hidey hole?

SandraK:  are you  :jocolor: ?  dats wat  i do best  :smt061  :smt077


  Klaas  LOL LOL  ! Are you her sistah?   :wink:  You got Sandra Speak down pat..  :wink:   <she really has never done a thing to me.. always has been nice..>

Well Angie, she hasn't been as nice to me.

Me either


  :(  sorry..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:37:34 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm feelin' the wub tonight.......

Has everyone else seen Dream Girls?  I watched that this afternoon instead of taking my nap.


On TV or dvd?If on TV,what channel?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:38:37 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Angie

I wub you  :D (It had been a long time since anyone told you, and now it's been twice in one day.)  :wink:


Well damn,I feel left out now. :lol:


Well, I wub GEL and Easywriter too (and anyone else who is reading at the moment). I am just filled to the brim with wub.  :lol:  :smt055


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:39:21 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


I think Roger has been all over the map on this case.  The stranger the theory the more he likes it.  What is his name?  Sam something?


 Oh dang.. yes it is Sam.. and I have a pic of him.. I wont post it on the forum though.
he also is JON..  :roll:  IIRC he posts at BFN too I was told but I cant read there. so I dunno?


He was Andrew at BFN for a while.  Don't know if he still posts there now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:39:22 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Angie

I wub you  :D (It had been a long time since anyone told you, and now it's been twice in one day.)  :wink:


  ROFL BY  Luv yah too  :wink:

GEL   Luv yah sweety and EASY  you as well   :lol:  :lol:

I need a tissue now. sniff sniff..   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:40:00 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Angie

I wub you  :D (It had been a long time since anyone told you, and now it's been twice in one day.)  :wink:


Well damn,I feel left out now. :lol:


Well, I wub GEL and Easywriter too (and anyone else who is reading at the moment). I am just filled to the brim with wub.  :lol:  :smt055


awww thank you,I wub you too. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:40:28 PM
There are lots of penguins on the rock right now if anyone wants to take a look. http://www.tnaqua.org/Animals/Penguins.asp


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:40:46 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm feelin' the wub tonight.......

Has everyone else seen Dream Girls?  I watched that this afternoon instead of taking my nap.


On TV or dvd?If on TV,what channel?


I got the DVD, because I was curious.  It was not what I expected, but it was pretty good.  Got a little loud at times.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 06:41:05 PM
looks like everyone wubs everyone


LOL

thats nice  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:41:35 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Angie

I wub you  :D (It had been a long time since anyone told you, and now it's been twice in one day.)  :wink:


  ROFL BY  Luv yah too  :wink:

GEL   Luv yah sweety and EASY  you as well   :lol:  :lol:

I need a tissue now. sniff sniff..   :lol:  :lol:


snif snif I wub you,now pass the box of tissue please. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:41:56 PM
Quote from: "robots"
looks like everyone wubs everyone


LOL

thats nice  8)


 :smt058


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:42:59 PM
There's a calm surrender to the rush of day
When the heat of the rolling world can be turned away
An enchanted moment, and it sees me through
It's enough for this restless warrior just to be with you

And can you feel the love tonight
It is where we are
It's enough for this wide-eyed wanderer
That we got this far
And can you feel the love tonight
How it's laid to rest
It's enough to make kings and vagabonds
Believe the very best


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:43:43 PM
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:44:15 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm feelin' the wub tonight.......

Has everyone else seen Dream Girls?  I watched that this afternoon instead of taking my nap.


On TV or dvd?If on TV,what channel?


I got the DVD, because I was curious.  It was not what I expected, but it was pretty good.  Got a little loud at times.


oh ok..thought if it was on HBO, I could see it on repeat.  BTW I finally saw Brokeback Mountain the other day :shock:  :lol: that's all I can say about it. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:44:16 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There's a calm surrender to the rush of day
When the heat of the rolling world can be turned away
An enchanted moment, and it sees me through
It's enough for this restless warrior just to be with you

And can you feel the love tonight
It is where we are
It's enough for this wide-eyed wanderer
That we got this far
And can you feel the love tonight
How it's laid to rest
It's enough to make kings and vagabonds
Believe the very best


 :smt058


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:45:36 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


I wanna photo too! Can I have one? Huh? Can I? Can I? :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:46:44 PM
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:47:20 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:48:05 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


I wanna photo too! Can I have one? Huh? Can I? Can I? :P


 yep.. its of Roger.  AKA Sam..   its not his avi pic either he used here.. somsone emailed with him log ago and he sent them his photo.  Hold on.. I'll send it to yah too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 06:48:11 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


Thanks!  Looks like an older version of the guy with the beard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:48:17 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I'm laughing until my stomach hurts here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 06:49:16 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:



all this wub...feel like passing some around!
this little ditty reminded me....anybody going out to vegas?
you have to go so Cirque de Solei's Beatles Love show at the Mirage!!!!
it was fantastic!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:49:21 PM
Hey y'all - take a look at the link below. I live in a very pretty town.  :D

http://www.tnaqua.org/VisitorInfo/Riverfront.asp


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 06:49:43 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


I wanna photo too! Can I have one? Huh? Can I? Can I? :P


 yep.. its of Roger.  AKA Sam..   its not his avi pic either he used here.. somsone emailed with him log ago and he sent them his photo.  Hold on.. I'll send it to yah too.


I want to see it too..lol..get my email addy from Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:49:57 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:


  ROFL  :)

KLAAS you have MAIL too  at the C addy..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:51:37 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


Thanks!  Looks like an older version of the guy with the beard.


 YW..  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 06:52:12 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:



all this wub...feel like passing some around!
this little ditty reminded me....anybody going out to vegas?
you have to go so Cirque de Solei's Beatles Love show at the Mirage!!!!
it was fantastic!!!!


Hey Cuz - I haven't seen it, but my goal in life is to see every Cirque du Soleil show that's out there.

Sincerely,

Buttface  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 06:52:53 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


I think Roger has been all over the map on this case.  The stranger the theory the more he likes it.  What is his name?  Sam something?


 Oh dang.. yes it is Sam.. and I have a pic of him.. I wont post it on the forum though.
he also is JON..  :roll:  IIRC he posts at BFN too I was told but I cant read there. so I dunno?


Angie - he is NOT Jon, JON is Shizaru.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:55:21 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
EASYWRITER  check your email  :) You have a photo ..


I wanna photo too! Can I have one? Huh? Can I? Can I? :P


 yep.. its of Roger.  AKA Sam..   its not his avi pic either he used here.. somsone emailed with him log ago and he sent them his photo.  Hold on.. I'll send it to yah too.


I want to see it too..lol..get my email addy from Klaas.


 Poor Klaas.. LOL  I sent her an email back.. asked her for yours  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:57:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
I guess I was wrong but I thought Roger was pro-H/T's??


I think Roger has been all over the map on this case.  The stranger the theory the more he likes it.  What is his name?  Sam something?


 Oh dang.. yes it is Sam.. and I have a pic of him.. I wont post it on the forum though.
he also is JON..  :roll:  IIRC he posts at BFN too I was told but I cant read there. so I dunno?


Angie - he is NOT Jon, JON is Shizaru.


 :shock:  :shock:   Yikes!  Guess I was given wrong info .. sowwy  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 06:57:19 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:



all this wub...feel like passing some around!
this little ditty reminded me....anybody going out to vegas?
you have to go so Cirque de Solei's Beatles Love show at the Mirage!!!!
it was fantastic!!!!


Hey Cuz - I haven't seen it, but my goal in life is to see every Cirque du Soleil show that's out there.

Sincerely,

Buttface  :D




 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
i can understand why now! i had never been to one before...dang..it is hard to decide where to look!!! so much going on at once....plus the music was awesome...there were speakers in the theater seats that made it feel like you were surrounded by the music!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 06:58:47 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
wub is all you need.

All you need is wub.
All you need is wub.
All you need is wub, wub.
Wub is all you need.


I feel like Elmer Fudd!  :shock:



all this wub...feel like passing some around!
this little ditty reminded me....anybody going out to vegas?
you have to go so Cirque de Solei's Beatles Love show at the Mirage!!!!
it was fantastic!!!!



 Hey chicky   :wink:  I need a vacation.. :)  Lets go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Think we coujd do it without getting arrested?  LMAO    :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 07:01:24 PM
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:03:06 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


Can I go too?  :D What hubby doesn't know won't hurt him, right?  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 07:03:40 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "thecuz"
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


Can I go too?  :D What hubby doesn't know won't hurt him, right?  8)


I'm going in July for 3 days  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:04:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "thecuz"
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


Can I go too?  :D What hubby doesn't know won't hurt him, right?  8)


I'm going in July for 3 days  :wink:  :lol:


Okay, well I'll meet you there!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 07:05:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "thecuz"
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


Can I go too?  :D What hubby doesn't know won't hurt him, right?  8)


I'm going in July for 3 days  :wink:  :lol:



where are you going to stay klass? we stayed at Ceasers Palace...it was awesome! oh...and you have to try Bobby Flay's rest there....Mesa!!!
i thought i was in heaven!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:05:32 PM
Klaas - I'll at least be in the same state as you, unless you're going to Vegas the last week in July, cause I'm going to be in San Francisco at a training.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:06:13 PM
GEL  You got mail..  TY Klaas  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 02, 2007, 07:06:47 PM
Good for you Klaasend.
You need a break from us, eh ?
And that Elmer Fudd guy  :lol:  :lol: Somehow I cannot picture him in a hat like Elmer's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:07:26 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


  ROFL    Yep.. you got it sistah !!  :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:07:56 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Good for you Klaasend.
You need a break from us, eh ?
And that Elmer Fudd guy  :lol:  :lol: Somehow I cannot picture him in a hat like Elmer's.


Are you trying to say that Klaas won't be moderating from a laptop while she's in Vegas? Get outta here!  :shock:  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 07:08:04 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - I'll at least be in the same state as you, unless you're going to Vegas the last week in July, cause I'm going to be in San Francisco at a training.


I'll be in Vegas the 8th, 9th and leave the 10th.  We won't be going to any shows though.  Will be sitting behind a slot machine unless I run out of money, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 07:08:45 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Good for you Klaasend.
You need a break from us, eh ?
And that Elmer Fudd guy  :lol:  :lol: Somehow I cannot picture him in a hat like Elmer's.


Are you trying to say that Klaas won't be moderating from a laptop while she's in Vegas? Get outta here!  :shock:  :P


I probably will take my laptop  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:09:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "thecuz"
i think we could manage angie....but...what happens in vegas...stays in vegas after all!


Can I go too?  :D What hubby doesn't know won't hurt him, right?  8)


I'm going in July for 3 days  :wink:  :lol:


  GOOD  for you Klaas.. you need a break.. you are'nt taking a PC are yah?  :shock:  You need to go and have some fun.. and we can manage here.. LOl  Robots and lalas and San wil keep us in line!  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:10:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - I'll at least be in the same state as you, unless you're going to Vegas the last week in July, cause I'm going to be in San Francisco at a training.


I'll be in Vegas the 8th, 9th and leave the 10th.  We won't be going to any shows though.  Will be sitting behind a slot machine unless I run out of money, lol  :lol:


I fly to San Francisco on Tues., July 24, and fly back home that Saturday. The hotel is on Fisherman's Wharf, so I can spend all my free time being a tourist.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 07:10:42 PM
i felt fortunate....i only lost 120.00 in 4 days....as you can tell..i am not a big gambler!!! one of the ladies i went with was tho...omg...she can play 2 $5.00 slots at one time and not blink an eye :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 07:12:13 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - I'll at least be in the same state as you, unless you're going to Vegas the last week in July, cause I'm going to be in San Francisco at a training.


I'll be in Vegas the 8th, 9th and leave the 10th.  We won't be going to any shows though.  Will be sitting behind a slot machine unless I run out of money, lol  :lol:


I fly to San Francisco on Tues., July 24, and fly back home that Saturday. The hotel is on Fisherman's Wharf, so I can spend all my free time being a tourist.  :D



bt...i would love to tag along on this trip...i have never been to san francisci!!! and i am a sucker for tourist trappings!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 07:12:37 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
GEL  You got mail..  TY Klaas  :)


Got it-thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:13:53 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas - I'll at least be in the same state as you, unless you're going to Vegas the last week in July, cause I'm going to be in San Francisco at a training.


I'll be in Vegas the 8th, 9th and leave the 10th.  We won't be going to any shows though.  Will be sitting behind a slot machine unless I run out of money, lol  :lol:


I fly to San Francisco on Tues., July 24, and fly back home that Saturday. The hotel is on Fisherman's Wharf, so I can spend all my free time being a tourist.  :D



bt...i would love to tag along on this trip...i have never been to san francisci!!! and i am a sucker for tourist trappings!!!


Well, come on! I've never been there either, nor has my co-worker Donna who is going to the training as well. We're very excited about going, and we talk all the time at work about how much fun we're going to have when we get there.  :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 07:15:18 PM
Fox just repeated the dismissal of the wrongful death suit :shock: what's up with that I wonder?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:15:33 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
i felt fortunate....i only lost 120.00 in 4 days....as you can tell..i am not a big gambler!!! one of the ladies i went with was tho...omg...she can play 2 $5.00 slots at one time and not blink an eye :shock:

 I am not a gambler either Everyone I work with is.. and they make fun cause I wont dump $$$$$$$$ i the poker machine at work. WHICH.. ummmm... is illegal..  LOL  Only a few people are allowed to play that are steady customers that we pay out to. Its kinf of hidden in a corner.. where when customers come in.. they cant see the person. Only those who know its there. play.  I have seen thenm dump 300.00 and more in it .. to only hit fruits and win 150.00 ?   Crazy IMO..  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:17:00 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
GEL  You got mail..  TY Klaas  :)


Got it-thanks!


  YW.. not much to look at and its kind of blurry..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 07:19:47 PM
all this talk of trips sounds dreamy!!! i would love to travel all the time if i had the time and money...lol!!!
well...will just have to do with a little pretend traveling for now....on my way out to eat some Mexican food!!!!! later monkeys!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 07:19:58 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
i felt fortunate....i only lost 120.00 in 4 days....as you can tell..i am not a big gambler!!! one of the ladies i went with was tho...omg...she can play 2 $5.00 slots at one time and not blink an eye :shock:


You have to play big to win big  :wink:  Of course, if you don't win you lose big, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:20:48 PM
:shock:  :shock:  I wish San was on to shoot me.. BRB
Step son called my cell and his car caught on fire..  on a BUSY Route nonetheless.. Fire trucks are there.. and he said its a goner..  :shock:
 Whole interior is gone.. and the fireman told him he can get into it to see if any of his personal crap is salvagable. His daddy.. my hubby is in the garage.. and not answering his cell.. gotta run up there.. cause he has to have it towed and wants it towed to my house?   :shock:  Damn kids.. Im telling yah................. Dunno how it caught fire either??  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 07:22:11 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Hey y'all - take a look at the link below. I live in a very pretty town.  :D

http://www.tnaqua.org/VisitorInfo/Riverfront.asp


It sure is colorful!  When mom and sis were here last weekend we drove over to a little town nestled along the eastern shore of Mobile Bay to take a look at the flowers and grab something to eat.  The town is known for planting flowers all over the downtown area for every season.  There is also a very good Italian restaurant overlooking the bay where we pigged out!

Here are a couple of pictures of the flowers.

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/intersection.gif)

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/uptown.gif)

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/clock.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: thecuz on June 02, 2007, 07:22:41 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  :shock:  I wish San was on to shoot me.. BRB
Step son called my cell and his car caught on fire..  on a BUSY Route nonetheless.. Fire trucks are there.. and he said its a goner..  :shock:
 Whole interior is gone.. and the fireman told him he can get into it to see if any of his personal crap is salvagable. His daddy.. my hubby is in the garage.. and not answering his cell.. gotta run up there.. cause he has to have it towed and wants it towed to my house?   :shock:  Damn kids.. Im telling yah................. Dunno how it caught fire either??  :roll:



angie...omg...your life is a soap opera right now....poor thing...i know its not any consolation but it will be better...maybe in about 5 years!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 07:28:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Good for you Klaasend.
You need a break from us, eh ?
And that Elmer Fudd guy  :lol:  :lol: Somehow I cannot picture him in a hat like Elmer's.


Are you trying to say that Klaas won't be moderating from a laptop while she's in Vegas? Get outta here!  :shock:  :P


I probably will take my laptop  :wink:


There was a report on the news the other day that 1 out of 5 people now take a laptop on vacation and 4 out of 5 take a cell.  Getting away ain't like it used to be! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:32:02 PM
Quote from: "thecuz"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  :shock:  I wish San was on to shoot me.. BRB
Step son called my cell and his car caught on fire..  on a BUSY Route nonetheless.. Fire trucks are there.. and he said its a goner..  :shock:
 Whole interior is gone.. and the fireman told him he can get into it to see if any of his personal crap is salvagable. His daddy.. my hubby is in the garage.. and not answering his cell.. gotta run up there.. cause he has to have it towed and wants it towed to my house?   :shock:  Damn kids.. Im telling yah................. Dunno how it caught fire either??  :roll:



angie...omg...your life is a soap opera right now....poor thing...i know its not any consolation but it will be better...maybe in about 5 years!!!



 back.. his exhaust manifold ? something about that and going up into the dashboard and burning wires?  I dont know crap about cars.. he talked to his dad.. so now we will have a burnt peice of shit here.  :roll:
 CUZ I am gonna run away.  LOL  God BLESS YOU.. when I think about what YOU guys have been through.. things like these should not bother me. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:34:27 PM
Easy - those pictures are gorgeous! Thanks for posting them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:35:23 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Good for you Klaasend.
You need a break from us, eh ?
And that Elmer Fudd guy  :lol:  :lol: Somehow I cannot picture him in a hat like Elmer's.


Are you trying to say that Klaas won't be moderating from a laptop while she's in Vegas? Get outta here!  :shock:  :P


I probably will take my laptop  :wink:


There was a report on the news the other day that 1 out of 5 people now take a laptop on vacation and 4 out of 5 take a cell.  Getting away ain't like it used to be! lol


 That is so true Mike!   I can do without a PC if I go away.. but my cell is a must in case of an emergency.. WTF did we all do years ago when cells didnt exsist?  Mine is like part of my anatomy.. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:37:15 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 That is so true Mike!   I can do without a PC if I go away.. but my cell is a must in case of an emergency.. WTF did we all do years ago when cells didnt exsist?  Mine is like part of my anatomy.. lol


I'm totally addicted to my laptop. I can't imagine traveling without it.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 07:38:14 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Easy - those pictures are gorgeous! Thanks for posting them.


That's a beautiful little town.  Always a pleasure to go there on a Sunday afternoon and look in the store windows.  One art store has a huge cat that likes to sit in the front window.  I couldn't get a good shot of that, because the cat wouldn't pose for me! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 07:39:42 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 That is so true Mike!   I can do without a PC if I go away.. but my cell is a must in case of an emergency.. WTF did we all do years ago when cells didnt exsist?  Mine is like part of my anatomy.. lol


I'm totally addicted to my laptop. I can't imagine traveling without it.  :oops:


  LOL    :wink:  Ohy for crying out loud.. I am gonna scream BRB again


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:40:09 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Easy - those pictures are gorgeous! Thanks for posting them.


That's a beautiful little town.  Always a pleasure to go there on a Sunday afternoon and look in the store windows.  One art store has a huge cat that likes to sit in the front window.  I couldn't get a good shot of that, because the cat wouldn't pose for me! lol


I love little shops that have animals in them. We have a bookstore here that the owner brings her cat to. It makes the shop feel so cozy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 07:40:27 PM
Here's one for all you baseball fans, lol  :lol:


Minor League Manager Has Major League Meltdown

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277393,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 07:41:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here's one for all you baseball fans, lol  :lol:


Minor League Manager Has Major League Meltdown

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277393,00.html


I saw that on the news earlier.  That guy needs a check-up! lol lol lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 07:42:35 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Good for you Klaasend.
You need a break from us, eh ?
And that Elmer Fudd guy  :lol:  :lol: Somehow I cannot picture him in a hat like Elmer's.


Are you trying to say that Klaas won't be moderating from a laptop while she's in Vegas? Get outta here!  :shock:  :P


I probably will take my laptop  :wink:


There was a report on the news the other day that 1 out of 5 people now take a laptop on vacation and 4 out of 5 take a cell.  Getting away ain't like it used to be! lol


 That is so true Mike!   I can do without a PC if I go away.. but my cell is a must in case of an emergency.. WTF did we all do years ago when cells didnt exsist?  Mine is like part of my anatomy.. lol


lol..I don't have one but both my girls do and sometimes I think it's part of their head cuz they're always talking on them :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:48:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here's one for all you baseball fans, lol  :lol:


Minor League Manager Has Major League Meltdown

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277393,00.html


What a nut!  :shock:

The back of his shirt says Wellman, but I think he is a Sickman.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 07:50:40 PM
LOL..Windy City asks at FOB "Where's the hidey hole"
and he also asks:
There's way too many people lurking and not enough posting.  Can I come down?  C'mon guys.  What gives?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 07:52:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here's one for all you baseball fans, lol  :lol:


Minor League Manager Has Major League Meltdown

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277393,00.html


Wow, he had quite a routine...I've seen dirt kicked on home plate & bases pulled up, but not all in one rant.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 07:53:27 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..Windy City asks at FOB "Where's the hidey hole"
and he also asks:
There's way too many people lurking and not enough posting.  Can I come down?  C'mon guys.  What gives?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 07:55:45 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY

that might be one of the funniest moments in sport in quite a while.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 07:56:41 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
LOL..Windy City asks at FOB "Where's the hidey hole"
and he also asks:
There's way too many people lurking and not enough posting.  Can I come down?  C'mon guys.  What gives?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


48 users online over there...don't think any of them will answer tho :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 07:57:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here's one for all you baseball fans, lol  :lol:


Minor League Manager Has Major League Meltdown

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277393,00.html


OMG we were watching the same thing...lmao!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 07:57:33 PM
I was reading old Sam/Roger's post at FOB and it sounds like he thinks he deserves some money.  Just what did he do that brought about the successful closure of this case?  Was it the sleeping sex thing, or the death by orgasm thing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 08:03:36 PM
Just caught up reading!!!  I want some of this love that is being passed around and I definitely want to go somewhere, anywhere will do!!!!  BRB I gotta restart this computer cause is acting stupid!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 08:04:00 PM
Hi Monkeys,
In total there are 31 users online :: 4 Registered, 0 Hidden and 27 Guests [ Administrator ] [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 183 on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:16 pm
Registered Users: 2NJSons_Mom, BTgirl, greeneyedlady, Tibrogargan , Muffee Bee and I know Angie will be back. And anyone else I missed.

I had been reading and not signed in but had to get in on the Wub fest.  :lol:

Easy those pictures of that town are gorgeous. I love it when these towns try to keep their areas beautiful.

By the way I want everyone to know I am not Roger. :lol:  Rogers real name may be Sam I do not know. Mine is not but it is the only name I have used on these message boards. It has caused me to be confused with the other Sam so I try when posting at BFN or Easys place to say SM Sam on my post.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:04:57 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I was reading old Sam/Roger's post at FOB and it sounds like he thinks he deserves some money.  Just what did he do that brought about the successful closure of this case?  Was it the sleeping sex thing, or the death by orgasm thing?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:08:02 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Just caught up reading!!!  I want some of this love that is being passed around and I definitely want to go somewhere, anywhere will do!!!!  BRB I gotta restart this computer cause is acting stupid!!!!


I wub you Casa, and you are more than welcome to come to San Francisco with me.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:08:29 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Hi Monkeys,
In total there are 31 users online :: 4 Registered, 0 Hidden and 27 Guests [ Administrator ] [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 183 on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:16 pm
Registered Users: 2NJSons_Mom, BTgirl, greeneyedlady, Tibrogargan , Muffee Bee and I know Angie will be back. And anyone else I missed.

I had been reading and not signed in but had to get in on the Wub fest.  :lol:

Easy those pictures of that town are gorgeous. I love it when these towns try to keep their areas beautiful.

By the way I want everyone to know I am not Roger. :lol:  Rogers real name may be Sam I do not know. Mine is not but it is the only name I have used on these message boards. It has caused me to be confused with the other Sam so I try when posting at BFN or Easys place to say SM Sam on my post.


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:11:37 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I was reading old Sam/Roger's post at FOB and it sounds like he thinks he deserves some money.  Just what did he do that brought about the successful closure of this case?  Was it the sleeping sex thing, or the death by orgasm thing?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Looks like SandraK thinks she deserves some money for confusing the hell out of everyone for the past two years.  Ya know, it would be fun to get the "thought print" guy to read her thoughts and then watch him start to blow some circuits!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:14:00 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I was reading old Sam/Roger's post at FOB and it sounds like he thinks he deserves some money.  Just what did he do that brought about the successful closure of this case?  Was it the sleeping sex thing, or the death by orgasm thing?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Looks like SandraK thinks she deserves some money for confusing the hell out of everyone for the past two years.  Ya know, it would be fun to get the "thought print" guy to read her thoughts and then watch him start to blow some circuits!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Even if SandraK did solve the case and told someone, they'd never know it. I haven't met anyone yet who could interpret SandraSpeak.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:20:31 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "casa"
Just caught up reading!!!  I want some of this love that is being passed around and I definitely want to go somewhere, anywhere will do!!!!  BRB I gotta restart this computer cause is acting stupid!!!!


I wub you Casa, and you are more than welcome to come to San Francisco with me.  :D


Blue moon
You saw me standing alone
Without a dream in my heart
Without a wub on my own…


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 08:21:57 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Well I seldom post on the front page but I hae seen post on there by a Sam. If I do post on FP I add the SM so folks will know it is me.

I think we all know the facts. J2k are guilty at least JVDS. We may not know all the details. H*** Joran has told so many stories evn he may no longer know the details. :?  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:22:22 PM
It's so quiet in here tonight I guess I will have to sing some more wub songs.   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:23:35 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
It's so quiet in here tonight I guess I will have to sing some more wub songs.   :P


Google wub songs and share with us what you find.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 08:24:35 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "casa"
Just caught up reading!!!  I want some of this love that is being passed around and I definitely want to go somewhere, anywhere will do!!!!  BRB I gotta restart this computer cause is acting stupid!!!!


I wub you Casa, and you are more than welcome to come to San Francisco with me.  :D


AAWW thank you BT girl!  I wub you too and I would love to come to San Francisco but unfortunatly I have to teach ACT prep and work at the Jr. College here!  One of these days I won't have to work ALL the time!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:24:53 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Easywriter"


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Well I seldom post on the front page but I hae seen post on there by a Sam. If I do post on FP I add the SM so folks will know it is me.

I think we all know the facts. J2k are guilty at least JVDS. We may not know all the details. H*** Joran has told so many stories evn he may no longer know the details. :?  :?


Hi Sam,

I think Joran is crazy enough to convince himself that whatever is most convenient for him at any given moment is also the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:25:08 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Easywriter"


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Well I seldom post on the front page but I hae seen post on there by a Sam. If I do post on FP I add the SM so folks will know it is me.

I think we all know the facts. J2k are guilty at least JVDS. We may not know all the details. H*** Joran has told so many stories evn he may no longer know the details. :?  :?


Some times I think he was too messed up that night to remember the details and that someone else took care of things after they got him away from the location.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 08:26:46 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
It's so quiet in here tonight I guess I will have to sing some more wub songs.   :P


Google wub songs and share with us what you find.  :lol:


Ive got one for you if I can find the lyrics! Im searching!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:28:32 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Easywriter"


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Well I seldom post on the front page but I hae seen post on there by a Sam. If I do post on FP I add the SM so folks will know it is me.

I think we all know the facts. J2k are guilty at least JVDS. We may not know all the details. H*** Joran has told so many stories evn he may no longer know the details. :?  :?


Hi Sam,

I think Joran is crazy enough to convince himself that whatever is most convenient for him at any given moment is also the truth.


When I was reading that Panorama interview I kept thinking he didn't want to answer some questions because he couldn't remember what story was in the book.  Then I thought if that book had his best thought out and edited version of events that guy is one major dumba$$!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:30:06 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Just caught up reading!!!  I want some of this love that is being passed around and I definitely want to go somewhere, anywhere will do!!!!  BRB I gotta restart this computer cause is acting stupid!!!!


 Hi Casa and Sam..  :)    Casa I just got off the phone with the CUZ.. :)
 She is such a sweetheart.. Sighhhhhhhh


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:31:18 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Easywriter"


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Well I seldom post on the front page but I hae seen post on there by a Sam. If I do post on FP I add the SM so folks will know it is me.

I think we all know the facts. J2k are guilty at least JVDS. We may not know all the details. H*** Joran has told so many stories evn he may no longer know the details. :?  :?


Hi Sam,

I think Joran is crazy enough to convince himself that whatever is most convenient for him at any given moment is also the truth.


When I was reading that Panorama interview I kept thinking he didn't want to answer some questions because he couldn't remember what story was in the book.  Then I thought if that book had his best thought out and edited version of events that guy is one major dumba$$!


Yep - he acts like he's already fried his brain, and he's only 19. I hate to see what he'll be like a few years from now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:31:55 PM
Warning:  Don't eat my NEW breakfast sandwich first thing in the morning on an empty stomach!  It will follow you around the rest of the day!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:33:24 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here's one for all you baseball fans, lol  :lol:


Minor League Manager Has Major League Meltdown

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hUcFWPgB8oY


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277393,00.html


OMG we were watching the same thing...lmao!!!!


 :lol:  You and klaas got ESP!   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 08:33:49 PM
Opri is on Geraldo! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 08:34:33 PM
I lived about 40 miles away from San Francisco back in my single days as well as after I married. I love Frisco. We do go back occasionaly. If at all possible take time to go to the Haight Ashbury section. Ashbury has some beautiful old Victorian houses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 08:35:23 PM
If you're goin to San Francisco
Be sure to wear some flowers in your hair
If you"re goin to San Francisco
You're gonna meet some gentle people there

For those who come to San Francisco
Summertime will be a love-in there
In the streets of San Francisco
Gentle people with flowers in their hair

All across the nation, such a strange vibration
People in motion
There's a whole generation with a new explanation
People in motion, people in motion

For those who come to San Francisco
Be sure to wear some flowers in your hair
If you come to San Francisco
Summer time will be a love-in there








Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 08:37:51 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Easywriter"


Sorry Sam!  I think Scrux Roger also uses the name Sam and I have not really figured him out.  Except on occasion he states his theories as facts and that is bothersome.


Well I seldom post on the front page but I hae seen post on there by a Sam. If I do post on FP I add the SM so folks will know it is me.

I think we all know the facts. J2k are guilty at least JVDS. We may not know all the details. H*** Joran has told so many stories evn he may no longer know the details. :?  :?


Some times I think he was too messed up that night to remember the details and that someone else took care of things after they got him away from the location.


I have had that thought, too, Easy....somebody knows...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 08:38:42 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "casa"
Just caught up reading!!!  I want some of this love that is being passed around and I definitely want to go somewhere, anywhere will do!!!!  BRB I gotta restart this computer cause is acting stupid!!!!


 Hi Casa and Sam..  :)    Casa I just got off the phone with the CUZ.. :)
 She is such a sweetheart.. Sighhhhhhhh


Hi Angie! Yes, Cuz is the best!!!  My baby girl still misses her and working for her!! She talks about it a lot.  It was a good time in my baby's life and the cuz helped it to be better.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:39:29 PM
Thanks Sam and Casa - I'm definitely feeling the wub for San Francisco now.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:40:40 PM
{{edit - let's not link to FOB}}

 OMG  Read this shit???????????  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:43:03 PM
Posted by Seawolf at FOB:

LEAKED INFO FROM MOUNTAIN BROOK THAT JORAN MET SECRETLY WITH BETH AND HAS BASICALLY BLAMED THE WHOLE DISSAPEARANCE OF NATALEE ON SATISH AND DEEPAK......i cannot confirm this but came form a very very close the situation source.......

 I got an IM from someone who sent me this and the link  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:43:44 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"


 OMG  Read this shit???????????  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


You think Seawolf might be pulling someone's leg?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 08:44:25 PM
Also BT, I do not know for sure if it still exist but Esprit used to have thier corprate office in an old warehouse.

 I will have to look it up. Anyway Doug Tomlinson the owner has a very large Amish quilt collection on display there. The designers have their small offices with these georgeous antique quilts to inspire them. The solid colors that are usually mixed with black become like Pop Art.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 08:44:44 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

Posted by Seawolf at FOB:
LEAKED INFO FROM MOUNTAIN BROOK THAT JORAN MET SECRETLY WITH BETH AND HAS BASICALLY BLAMED THE WHOLE DISSAPEARANCE OF NATALEE ON SATISH AND DEEPAK......i cannot confirm this but came form a very very close the situation source.......

 I got an IM from someone who sent me this and the link  :shock:


I don't doubt that he would love to blame the whole thing on the Kalpoes but I doubt he met secretly with Beth!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 08:44:47 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Thanks Sam and Casa - I'm definitely feeling the wub for San Francisco now.  :wink:


I was there after graduatiog college...went with 5 other girls.  It was the first stop of a 2 week tour of CA, LV & AZ.  Loved San Fran, and would love to go back.  Now, wondering where all my pictures are...mmmm, Lombard Street, etc. That was long ago.  A young friend who I used to work with had to go there a week or so ago for a seminar/class....she booked the hotel online...said it was a dump and wasn't thrilled with her experience.  Seems you are staying in a better area....I hope you enjoy what you can in your spare time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 02, 2007, 08:44:54 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

Posted by Seawolf at FOB:
LEAKED INFO FROM MOUNTAIN BROOK THAT JORAN MET SECRETLY WITH BETH AND HAS BASICALLY BLAMED THE WHOLE DISSAPEARANCE OF NATALEE ON SATISH AND DEEPAK......i cannot confirm this but came form a very very close the situation source.......

 I got an IM from someone who sent me this and the link  :shock:


LOL..I just read that and moon said"you sre so full of shit" :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 02, 2007, 08:47:26 PM
Thanks Angie. If anyone has an opinion on the credibility of *seawolf* i would love to hear it.  :arrow: TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:47:33 PM
Sam - the quilts sound beautiful!

2NJ - We're staying at a Holiday Inn on Fisherman's Wharf, and from the photos it looks quite nice. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 08:47:52 PM
ANGIE - Please no direct links to RU or FOB.  Also, if you are going to post a WILD post like that, please say who and where the post game from.  TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:49:21 PM
I don't read much over there, but the little I've seen leads me to believe that Seawolf is someone who likes to pull the chain of the Fobbers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:50:04 PM
Quote from: "greeneyedlady"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

Posted by Seawolf at FOB:
LEAKED INFO FROM MOUNTAIN BROOK THAT JORAN MET SECRETLY WITH BETH AND HAS BASICALLY BLAMED THE WHOLE DISSAPEARANCE OF NATALEE ON SATISH AND DEEPAK......i cannot confirm this but came form a very very close the situation source.......

 I got an IM from someone who sent me this and the link  :shock:


LOL..I just read that and moon said"you sre so full of shit" :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 Just posted what I got an IM about? Sorry I posted the link.. and I have NO IDEA who the hell SEAWOLF is.. or if this is true?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 08:51:05 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I don't read much over there, but the little I've seen leads me to believe that Seawolf is someone who likes to pull the chain of the Fobbers.


BTGirl - that would be my guess as well.  Seawolf is yanking their chain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 02, 2007, 08:51:07 PM
Deepak 6/15 from Joran's book posted on Scrux and BFN.

I think it is new stuff...have not read yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:52:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
ANGIE - Please no direct links to RU or FOB.  Also, if you are going to post a WILD post like that, please say who and where the post game from.  TIA


  Sorry   :oops:  :oops:
 Like I said.. I got an IM.. and was given the link.. and what was said. Guess I didnt think? Oh well.. I have done worse I suppose..  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 08:53:47 PM
Posted by Jon at Scrux:

Deepak June 15 statement (page 119)

Joran asked me what we had to do at the police. I had told him that both of us would have to drive the route. He then said that he also was called by the police and that he had to drive that route also.
We walked around in the garden of the Racquet Club. During the walk I asked him if he had done something to the girl. Joran said he had done nothing with the girl. He then said it would be better that we left "because if the police sees us together they are going to think that we are discussing something"
On that same day we went to Joran's home after he had called us and told us he was ready at the police. We went to his house around 9 pm. There we found Joran's father and mother in the room. Joran's mother said: Hello guys, come in", I have to "tap you on your fingers" because you are having problems again". With that she meant that a week prior we had had a fight at Carlos and Charlies. I had an argument with a guy and the police had come. Joran's mother said: "the last half year Joran is having problems all the time, a few months ago he pushed a guy through a vitrine of the cinema."
When that happened I did not knew Joran yet. His mother also said that Joran is always in the casinos and that they as parents had not raised him like that.
"And now you are in trouble again. Don't you see how serious this problem is? If something has happened to the girl, then you are in a lot of trouble" She looked at me and my brother and said: You also. You went out on a Sunday night. Does your mother know you went out?" I told her my mother did not know, because we had left before she had arrived home. She said to Joran:"You Joran have sneaked out, your father did not even know that you had went out". This is correct since when we had picked Joran up that day, he had told us that his father was asleep and his mother was in Holland.
His father said at a certain moment: "Yes Joran, I don't know when you have left and also not when you came back home".
After this his mother said to us: "Boys you will have to go home soon". She felt we should not be out on the streets untill late.
We also should not go in the neighbourhood of the Marriott, because the police would control for sure, and you never know what can happen. After that she said that Joran had to go to sleep. Joran asked if he could talk a little with us. His mother said: if you can keep it short".
After that his parents left. Joran said the situation was a little difficult. I told him that it was a serious matter.But we still decided to continue lying.

Deepak statement (page 123)

Tuesday June 2 I went to wotk. At around eleven Joran called me. He said that there were people at his school who were putting up posters of the missing girl. He told me that on the posters it was mentioned the girl was kidnapped and that ppl should ask Joran how and what.(Joran): As it seems the situation is getting worse. My father has looked for a lawyer for me".
I told him we would talk later. I went that day around 4 pm to Joran's house, Freddy and his father Paulus were there also.
I sat down and his father asked if I had problems at my job. He told me that ppl had went to and put up posters at Joran's school.
He said that he had arranged for lawyer Anthony Carlo for Joran. He asked me if I had a lawyer, I told him no. He asked me if I knew a lawyer, I told him I did not knew any lawyers because I had no experience with lawyers.
I stayed for an hour, we listened to the radio and watched tv. That day there was a search for the girl.
After a while Joran's mother came into the room. When she was in the room I heard her talk to someone who was involved in the search. I heard Joran's mother say they were buisy searching at the lighthouse. On a certain moment Joran asked his father: Dad if they find the girl at the lighthouse we are in trouble.His father answerd: "Yes then you are in trouble because you have stated that you have been there with the girl".
Joran asked his father after that: And if they don't find a body? His father answered: No, if they don't find a body then you are not that much into trouble. I asked: Is it just like in the VS that if they do not have a body that they do not have a case against you? Joran said: It is just like in the VS. If they don't have a body, if they don't have a weapon, if they don't have clothes with blood on it, if they don't have fingerprints, then they cannot start a case. Before I left Joran;s father asked me if i could ask my mother to call him.

Joran June 13 statement (Page 158)

Around 3 am I call Deepak and ask him to pick me up. He asks where the girl is. I say that she is on the beach sleeping and does not want to listen to me.
He would come immediately. I wake her up and tell her that I am going to bring her back to her hotel. She refuses and goes back to sleep. I wonder if I better pick her up and take her. I am lying down for 10 minutes next to Natalee, while she is sleeping. I am not saying anything to her because her eyes are closed. When I hear Deepak's car arriving I wake her up once more, again she does not want to come with me to her hotel. I stand up and walk to the car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 08:53:53 PM
Klaas.. I dont think I ever posted a link to RU ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 08:54:02 PM
Hello Monkeys! I have a feeling that IF any one of those three could meet with Beth and tell the truth....it would be the other way around. Deepak telling on Joran?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:55:15 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
ANGIE - Please no direct links to RU or FOB.  Also, if you are going to post a WILD post like that, please say who and where the post game from.  TIA


  Sorry   :oops:  :oops:
 Like I said.. I got an IM.. and was given the link.. and what was said. Guess I didnt think? Oh well.. I have done worse I suppose..  :wink:


Don't feel bad. Klaas has to smack me too and keep me in line.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 08:55:23 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Klaas.. I dont think I ever posted a link to RU ?

You didn't post RU, just FOB.  I just wanted to remind you that we don't want direct link to those nasty places.  No big deal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 08:56:55 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Sam - the quilts sound beautiful!

2NJ - We're staying at a Holiday Inn on Fisherman's Wharf, and from the photos it looks quite nice. :D


Esprit also has a ? warehouse or discount type store in the Fishermans wharf area. No real changing rooms just canvas stalls or folks just try the clothes on in the aisles.

Oh by the way it is cool generally in Frisco. Especailly at night but also in the daytime. So make sure you have at least a cardigan or sweatshirt. Dress is mostly casual.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 08:58:44 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Sam - the quilts sound beautiful!

2NJ - We're staying at a Holiday Inn on Fisherman's Wharf, and from the photos it looks quite nice. :D


Esprit also has a ? warehouse or discount type store in the Fishermans wharf area. No real changing rooms just canvas stalls or folks just try the clothes on in the aisles.

Oh by the way it is cool generally in Frisco. Especailly at night but also in the daytime. So make sure you have at least a cardigan or sweatshirt. Dress is mostly casual.


TY, Sam. And it's good that the dress is mostly casual, cause I'm mostly casual too. I think it will be a match made in heaven. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 09:00:57 PM
After a while Joran's mother came into the room. When she was in the room I heard her talk to someone who was involved in the search. I heard Joran's mother say they were buisy searching at the lighthouse. On a certain moment Joran asked his father: Dad if they find the girl at the lighthouse we are in trouble.His father answerd: "Yes then you are in trouble because you have stated that you have been there with the girl".
Joran asked his father after that: And if they don't find a body?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:05:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
After a while Joran's mother came into the room. When she was in the room I heard her talk to someone who was involved in the search. I heard Joran's mother say they were buisy searching at the lighthouse. On a certain moment Joran asked his father: Dad if they find the girl at the lighthouse we are in trouble.His father answerd: "Yes then you are in trouble because you have stated that you have been there with the girl".
Joran asked his father after that: And if they don't find a body?
Where was that shallow grave Tim Miller found? Was it near the lighthouse?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 09:06:38 PM
Elaine - no the shallow grave was at the other end of the island.  That is near where the belt was found though, and of course the rocks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 09:07:56 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Thanks Angie. If anyone has an opinion on the credibility of *seawolf* i would love to hear it.  :arrow: TIA


Seems to be the resident psychologist to the mentally disturbed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:08:00 PM
Is this info coming from Joran's book?  Why did he put those in his book, I wonder.....

So, does it sound like Joran knew they wouldn't find her at the lighthouse, or was he uncertain?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 09:09:59 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Is this info coming from Joran's book?  Why did he put those in his book, I wonder.....

So, does it sound like Joran knew they wouldn't find her at the lighthouse, or was he uncertain?


Yes, in his book. I haven't a clue.  It seems he has a bunch of the PV's in his book.  Maybe the author insisted?  I don't know.  He is a sociopath, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:11:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Elaine - no the shallow grave was at the other end of the island.  That is near where the belt was found though, and of course the rocks.
Thanks Klaas. Something happened in that area
near the lighthouse and the rocks. Even if she was taken there after something happened, or he wouldn't have asked such a question.  IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:12:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Is this info coming from Joran's book?  Why did he put those in his book, I wonder.....

So, does it sound like Joran knew they wouldn't find her at the lighthouse, or was he uncertain?


Yes, in his book. I haven't a clue.  It seems he has a bunch of the PV's in his book.  Maybe the author insisted?  I don't know.  He is a sociopath, IMO.


I could see him wanting to put PV's in his book if they made him look good, but so far they don't.  It is also funny that in the McGraw suit the Kalpoe attorney ask how the defense knows about some PV's, including the June 15th one and there it is in a book.  Strange.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 09:13:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
After a while Joran's mother came into the room. When she was in the room I heard her talk to someone who was involved in the search. I heard Joran's mother say they were buisy searching at the lighthouse. On a certain moment Joran asked his father: Dad if they find the girl at the lighthouse we are in trouble.His father answerd: "Yes then you are in trouble because you have stated that you have been there with the girl".
Joran asked his father after that: And if they don't find a body?


that's why he changes his story away from the lighthouse....duh!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:13:59 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Thanks Angie. If anyone has an opinion on the credibility of *seawolf* i would love to hear it.  :arrow: TIA


Seems to be the resident psychologist to the mentally disturbed.
:smt044  :smt044


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 09:14:18 PM
Rob and Easy,
I know we have speculated so much on the videos of the lighthouse rock videos on what was being painted or what they were painting with. Just got a wild thought. What if they were using something on them to confuse the dogs? Maybe make the dogs crazy like. I know there are things you can use when you are trying to train your dogs to stay away from certain areas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 09:15:49 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Thanks Angie. If anyone has an opinion on the credibility of *seawolf* i would love to hear it.  :arrow: TIA

  IGS.. I dunno who the hell Seawolf is for sure? I do thave one thought about who it may be? I wont post it here.  I dont read at FOB often unless someone brings it up?  I am to the point where I dont much give a shit anymore. These games assholes play are gettig old.. yah know?  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 09:16:49 PM
Sam- I have no idea.

Maybe DeVries will look at it????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Easy,you got a picture of me.I like that town,a lot.Question,from seawolf,"What was the first song played at the first Mnt.Brook Prom."My question for hockey fans,Which nhl teaM has the most French Canadiens.If answers are required,just ask.They named a cake after BT,I heard,moon pie,sorry hehehe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 09:17:09 PM
Ramm just posted this on the FP of SM - I thought it was pretty funny.  Posted under the Rudy Croes story about separating from the NL:  :lol:

bye, don’t let the door hit you in the behind when you walk out!!

See if the Netherlands cares Croes, just hope the Aruban people are ready for the introduction of “Venezuelan” rules on the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 02, 2007, 09:17:45 PM
All this *body* talk early on is very damning.

And again  :arrow: finding the *body*, dead or alive, is what an innocent person would want.

In this case the suspects are saying a lifetime of suspicion and doubt is preferable.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 02, 2007, 09:17:55 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Sam- I have no idea.

Maybe DeVries will look at it????


 You got mail


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 09:18:13 PM
Fox is teasin with a Natalee update.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 09:18:14 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Easy,you got a picture of me.I like that town,a lot.Question,from seawolf,"What was the first song played at the first Mnt.Brook Prom."My question for hockey fans,Which nhl teaM has the most French Canadiens.If answers are required,just ask.They named a cake after BT,I heard,moon pie,sorry hehehe


LOL, Tiger. I guess Moon Pie sounds better than Buttface cake.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:18:28 PM
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:18:47 PM
The latest on Natalee Holloway case coming up on Fox- LineUp


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:18:53 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Is this info coming from Joran's book?  Why did he put those in his book, I wonder.....

So, does it sound like Joran knew they wouldn't find her at the lighthouse, or was he uncertain?


Yes, in his book. I haven't a clue.  It seems he has a bunch of the PV's in his book.  Maybe the author insisted?  I don't know.  He is a sociopath, IMO.


I could see him wanting to put PV's in his book if they made him look good, but so far they don't.  It is also funny that in the McGraw suit the Kalpoe attorney ask how the defense knows about some PV's, including the June 15th one and there it is in a book.  Strange.....
I agree with Klaas, the author of the book wanted the PVs thrown in. She herself probably even feels that Joran did something bad and wanted to prove it by throwing that in. Even the latest interview I could tell that they want the world to see what Joran is really like. He thinks that they do this stuff cause they like him. I think they do these interviews and the book and all to show us what he is really like, let us read between the lines. That is sure my take on it.   IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:21:39 PM
yes,I thought so ,also.I have seen Moon Pies and RC colas for sale.Saw Mr Brooks today,a good flick,starts at a meeting,and after the serenity prayer the fun starts.point of movie,includes how far would you go to save a child,even an evil child.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:21:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Ramm just posted this on the FP of SM - I thought it was pretty funny.  Posted under the Rudy Croes story about separating from the NL:  :lol:

bye, don’t let the door hit you in the behind when you walk out!!

See if the Netherlands cares Croes, just hope the Aruban people are ready for the introduction of “Venezuelan” rules on the island.


LOL  Next he will be calling for a boycott!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 02, 2007, 09:22:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Ramm just posted this on the FP of SM - I thought it was pretty funny.  Posted under the Rudy Croes story about separating from the NL:  :lol:

bye, don’t let the door hit you in the behind when you walk out!!

See if the Netherlands cares Croes, just hope the Aruban people are ready for the introduction of “Venezuelan” rules on the island.


Hmm... maybe Ramm is getting tired of defending the indefensible? Nahhhh!!!..

Kinda funny that a Dutchie would get the 'I'll take my ball and go home' attitude after only two years. If we can't have it, no one can.

Earth To Ramm- Believe it or not there are actually people in Venezuela fighting for their freedom and challenging the corrupt Chavez. Something sorely lacking on Aruba... I'll remind you is a Dutch Colony....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:22:09 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 02, 2007, 09:25:22 PM
Well, Deepak is talking about Tuesday (?) June 2nd?  Anita comes in the room?? Is this supposed to be Wednesday (which was June 2) or did Anita come home early from Holland.  Did they put the posters up at school Tues or Wed??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:26:47 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


Sounds like it is about the lawsuit and then on to a nother story.  None of these people have the guts to go after Joran and deal with Taco.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:26:57 PM
Yep, it's the lawsuit  :cry:

Beth and Dave just HAVE to get a break!  Lord have Mercy!

Hopefully, even after all these setbacks, it will eventually be worth it, by recieveing the ultimate gift.  Real justice and a real burial for there daughter.  Closure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 09:27:08 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


We love you too Dihannah and Rob and Isigs and Klaas and Elaine and you too Tiger since none of you were here for the Wub fest. We wub all the Monkeys. Even the ones who are lurking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 09:27:44 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, Deepak is talking about Tuesday (?) June 2nd?  Anita comes in the room?? Is this supposed to be Wednesday (which was June 2) or did Anita come home early from Holland.  Did they put the posters up at school Tues or Wed??

I thought Anita arrived back from the NL on June 1st?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:29:15 PM
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 02, 2007, 09:29:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Well, Deepak is talking about Tuesday (?) June 2nd?  Anita comes in the room?? Is this supposed to be Wednesday (which was June 2) or did Anita come home early from Holland.  Did they put the posters up at school Tues or Wed??

I thought Anita arrived back from the NL on June 1st?


I thought she had said Wed, but I could be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:30:00 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


We love you too Dihannah and Rob and Isigs and Klaas and Elaine and you too Tiger since none of you were here for the Wub fest. We wub all the Monkeys. Even the ones who are lurking.
Awwww shucks, thanks! Feelings are mutual. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 09:30:13 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol: I was there in 1964 but was a bit too young to be "hazy", lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:30:37 PM
Damn,the senators scored again.The answer for the question from Seawolf is a Life In the Day


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:31:24 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


We love you too Dihannah and Rob and Isigs and Klaas and Elaine and you too Tiger since none of you were here for the Wub fest. We wub all the Monkeys. Even the ones who are lurking.


I didn't feel a lot of wub in that PV! lol  It would be interesting to see the real Anita in action.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:31:27 PM
I can't remember,to be honest,but the music was good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:31:51 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


Sounds like it is about the lawsuit and then on to a nother story.  None of these people have the guts to go after Joran and deal with Taco.
Easy, we need to let them know the lawsuit is old news now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 09:32:39 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Kimberly G is going to have something, but not sure what.  Probably the lawsuit thing again.


I'm always behind.  I was reading back when I heard it, shoulda known others would have heard it too.

I am hoping she brings up a little about the Panorama article, but big doubts on that.   I did email her last night.

Ok, back to catching up.  Not too far behind...

BTW - I wub you ALL too!


 :smt058


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:33:02 PM
Jossy and Linda on Line up!
!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:33:33 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I can't remember,to be honest,but the music was good.
ROFL :smt043


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:34:02 PM
Finally!  Kimberly is actually asking legitimate questions!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 02, 2007, 09:34:20 PM
Hmmm...Jossy says KLPD's stay has been extended?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:36:08 PM
Jossy again says, convinced the Dutch are very serious about there investigation.  Making an honest effort of solving this case. NO time limit on murder.  

Linda mentions the setback on Friday of suit in CA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 09:36:49 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:37:55 PM
Linda talking about Texas Equisearch,  they want to go further out in the water since they were only able to do close searches...

Sorry,  I'm not good at translating.  I missed alot, but think I got the jist of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:38:35 PM
Thank you Dear God, for not having the witch on!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:38:41 PM
I meant transcribing  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:39:15 PM
I can not recollect.i need to know the statute to answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 09:40:33 PM
i remember the song"ding dong the witch is dead"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:41:49 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
i remember the song"ding dong the witch is dead"
LMAO! Tiger you are killing me here. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:41:52 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 09:42:20 PM
Maybe it's me....but that quote from Deepak's PV said that Anita was on the phone with someone on the search at the lighthouse....how many perp families get calls from someone involved in the search?   Julia or someone close to the family, maybe?  Just thinking.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:42:25 PM
That was pretty good, but I wish they would take a look at some of Joran's interviews and that blasted book of his.

Thank God Taco wasn't on the show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:44:03 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Thank you Dear God, for not having the witch on!!


Yes, just Jossy and Linda.  I like Kimberly, she at least asks the right questions, but they were very limited on time.  So it was pretty short.

The witch  :smt078  was NOT on.  So I am still holding my dinner down


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:45:47 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
That was pretty good, but I wish they would take a look at some of Joran's interviews and that blasted book of his.

Thank God Taco wasn't on the show.


You know, I'm surprised his book and especially that disgusting interview hasn't been brought up.  I think especially  the article would make for good ratings, just for shock value.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:46:32 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Maybe it's me....but that quote from Deepak's PV said that Anita was on the phone with someone on the search at the lighthouse....how many perp families get calls from someone involved in the search?   Julia or someone close to the family, maybe?  Just thinking.....
Yes, good catch! Why was she on the phone? What was she worried about? Who was she on the phone with? Probably was Julia :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:46:33 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Thank you Dear God, for not having the witch on!!


Yes, just Jossy and Linda.  I like Kimberly, she at least asks the right questions, but they were very limited on time.  So it was pretty short.

The witch  :smt078  was NOT on.  So I am still holding my dinner down


I like Kimberly too and I don't think I liked her all that much on CTV.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:48:20 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Thank you Dear God, for not having the witch on!!


Yes, just Jossy and Linda.  I like Kimberly, she at least asks the right questions, but they were very limited on time.  So it was pretty short.

The witch  :smt078  was NOT on.  So I am still holding my dinner down
I hope she never does another show! Wouldn't that be great!@!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 09:48:34 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


I am sure your parents have told you that was a very traumatic event for our Nation. The most traumatic thing in my lifetime until  all the tradgedies that came after from Kooks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:49:20 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
That was pretty good, but I wish they would take a look at some of Joran's interviews and that blasted book of his.

Thank God Taco wasn't on the show.


You know, I'm surprised his book and especially that disgusting interview hasn't been brought up.  I think especially  the article would make for good ratings, just for shock value.


Yeah, they could have lead off with a shot of the cover page on that article and then went into what the punk said.  Only thing I can figure is that Taco still have them nervous for some reason, or he has some deal about anything they do about Joran.  Beats me.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:49:22 PM
Where did our Angie go, Hiya Angie!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 02, 2007, 09:50:43 PM
Klaas

Wednesday was June 1st (2005).  If Deepak was talking about the Tuesday meeting then I don't know when she got home.

Meddling/Jan/ICTB18

Not only did Fox have tickertape they also had phone number for

REWARD.  Call and tell them what you know.  Test the theory.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:51:47 PM
Oh my gosh can you beleieve this. Kim G is talking about a calender filled with serial Killers, unreal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:52:56 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas

Wednesday was June 1st (2005).  If Deepak was talking about the Tuesday meeting then I don't know when she got home.

Meddling/Jan/ICTB18

Not only did Fox have tickertape they also had phone number for

REWARD.  Call and tell them what you know.  Test the theory.
Is she not a trip? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 02, 2007, 09:53:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's mother said: Hello guys, come in", I have to "tap you on your fingers" because you are having problems again". With that she meant that a week prior we had had a fight at Carlos and Charlies. I had an argument with a guy and the police had come. Joran's mother said: "the last half year Joran is having problems all the time, a few months ago he pushed a guy through a vitrine of the cinema."
When that happened I did not knew Joran yet. His mother also said that Joran is always in the casinos and that they as parents had not raised him like that.
"And now you are in trouble again. Don't you see how serious this problem is? If something has happened to the girl, then you are in a lot of trouble" She looked at me and my brother and said: You also. You went out on a Sunday night. Does your mother know you went out?" I told her my mother did not know, because we had left before she had arrived home.

Like momma like son with the threats. Convincing the Ks to stick with the lie. Anita is chastising Deepak and Satish for sneaking out? :? And is going to *tap them on the fingers* for a CC's fight that happened before 5/30? Bizarre stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:54:26 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


I am sure your parents have told you that was a very traumatic event for our Nation. The most traumatic thing in my lifetime until  all the tradgedies that came after from Kooks.
Sam, was it not sad when JFK JR died. That broke my heart.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 09:55:07 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Oh my gosh can you beleieve this. Kim G is talking about a calender filled with serial Killers, unreal.


What is sad is there are crazies out there to buy it. Roll Models.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:55:41 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
That was pretty good, but I wish they would take a look at some of Joran's interviews and that blasted book of his.

Thank God Taco wasn't on the show.


You know, I'm surprised his book and especially that disgusting interview hasn't been brought up.  I think especially  the article would make for good ratings, just for shock value.


Yeah, they could have lead off with a shot of the cover page on that article and then went into what the punk said.  Only thing I can figure is that Taco still have them nervous for some reason, or he has some deal about anything they do about Joran.  Beats me.....


That's why I think Nancy could do it.  She just doesnt give sh!t  I never did successfully get my email sent to her.

Taco, is scared himself.  His client is making him look like an idiot.  I don't think he will do anything.  They wouldn't be slandering him anyways.  Joran said it, they would just be reporting what he 'stated' himself.  Not illegal.  It's reporting the facts.  He can't deny that!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 09:57:12 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


I am sure your parents have told you that was a very traumatic event for our Nation. The most traumatic thing in my lifetime until  all the tradgedies that came after from Kooks.
Sam, was it not sad when JFK JR died. That broke my heart.


Yes, I know everything about it.  My dad even saved the newspaper from that day.  I still have it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 09:57:14 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's mother said: Hello guys, come in", I have to "tap you on your fingers" because you are having problems again". With that she meant that a week prior we had had a fight at Carlos and Charlies. I had an argument with a guy and the police had come. Joran's mother said: "the last half year Joran is having problems all the time, a few months ago he pushed a guy through a vitrine of the cinema."
When that happened I did not knew Joran yet. His mother also said that Joran is always in the casinos and that they as parents had not raised him like that.
"And now you are in trouble again. Don't you see how serious this problem is? If something has happened to the girl, then you are in a lot of trouble" She looked at me and my brother and said: You also. You went out on a Sunday night. Does your mother know you went out?" I told her my mother did not know, because we had left before she had arrived home.

Like momma like son with the threats. Convincing the Ks to stick with the lie. Anita is chastising Deepak and Satish for sneaking out? :? And is going to *tap them on the fingers* for a CC's fight that happened before 5/30? Bizarre stuff.
Very bizare indeed. She is unreal, I think she wears the pants in that family. What a skunk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 09:58:45 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


He was assasinated on my 13th birthday.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 09:58:52 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
That was pretty good, but I wish they would take a look at some of Joran's interviews and that blasted book of his.

Thank God Taco wasn't on the show.


You know, I'm surprised his book and especially that disgusting interview hasn't been brought up.  I think especially  the article would make for good ratings, just for shock value.


Yeah, they could have lead off with a shot of the cover page on that article and then went into what the punk said.  Only thing I can figure is that Taco still have them nervous for some reason, or he has some deal about anything they do about Joran.  Beats me.....


That's why I think Nancy could do it.  She just doesnt give sh!t  I never did successfully get my email sent to her.

Taco, is scared himself.  His client is making him look like an idiot.  I don't think he will do anything.  They wouldn't be slandering him anyways.  Joran said it, they would just be reporting what he 'stated' himself.  Not illegal.  It's reporting the facts.  He can't deny that!


After Taco's threats all those months ago, you would think some of them would have jumped all over the story.  Not sure what it is about unless they are all pals or something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 09:59:46 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
I can't remember,to be honest,but the music was good.


Tiger you much be somewhere around my age.  I just don't think you will ever beat the music of the 60's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 10:00:26 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


He was assasinated on my 13th birthday.  :(


Sorry BT, That makes for a sad B-day.  My DH B-day is 9/11,  it was one he'll never forget..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 02, 2007, 10:00:50 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Oh my gosh can you beleieve this. Kim G is talking about a calender filled with serial Killers, unreal.


What is sad is there are crazies out there to buy it. Roll Models.
I hope I did not hear her right, they may get money from this? The criminals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 10:01:37 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's mother said: Hello guys, come in", I have to "tap you on your fingers" because you are having problems again". With that she meant that a week prior we had had a fight at Carlos and Charlies. I had an argument with a guy and the police had come. Joran's mother said: "the last half year Joran is having problems all the time, a few months ago he pushed a guy through a vitrine of the cinema."
When that happened I did not knew Joran yet. His mother also said that Joran is always in the casinos and that they as parents had not raised him like that.
"And now you are in trouble again. Don't you see how serious this problem is? If something has happened to the girl, then you are in a lot of trouble" She looked at me and my brother and said: You also. You went out on a Sunday night. Does your mother know you went out?" I told her my mother did not know, because we had left before she had arrived home.

Like momma like son with the threats. Convincing the Ks to stick with the lie. Anita is chastising Deepak and Satish for sneaking out? :? And is going to *tap them on the fingers* for a CC's fight that happened before 5/30? Bizarre stuff.
Very bizare indeed. She is unreal, I think she wears the pants in that family. What a skunk.


You would think she would tell them to sit down and tell her every detail instead of the crap she said and the warnings she gave about them going to certain areas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:02:02 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


I am sure your parents have told you that was a very traumatic event for our Nation. The most traumatic thing in my lifetime until  all the tradgedies that came after from Kooks.
Sam, was it not sad when JFK JR died. That broke my heart.


Yes Elaine, It was sad. He was such an adorable little boy when he was standing at attention saluting his Father at the funeral. It seems like it was just before his birthday. I can't remember if it was his second or third.

Our DIL got our son Flying lessons a few years ago for his Birthday. It worried me alot because of JFK. I know flying is as safe as an auto but still bothered me. He is very careful though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 02, 2007, 10:02:33 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
i remember the song"ding dong the witch is dead"


haha remember that one too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 02, 2007, 10:02:45 PM
That page from Panorama.. with the F D B , If you just look at it with the poster of Natalee, him, the headline the pictures of his " GirlFriends ",
it it pretty damning. The publisher and layout person sure did a number on him, eh ?
Seems as if he is saying that currently. I guess he is.
..
The translation could be wrong on the day of the week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 10:03:15 PM
Easy,  who are you talking about all being pals?  Isn't it all about the ratings?  Taco can't do crap on reporting the facts.  Joran wrote the book and did the interview.  I think it would make good ratings.  Of course, it is unfortunate to think of getting ratings on something so disgusting, but it's all about keeping her name in the news and shedding the light on what a true f#ck he is!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 10:07:49 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Easy,  who are you talking about all being pals?  Isn't it all about the ratings?  Taco can't do crap on reporting the facts.  Joran wrote the book and did the interview.  I think it would make good ratings.  Of course, it is unfortunate to think of getting ratings on something so disgusting, but it's all about keeping her name in the news and shedding the light on what a true f#ck he is!


I think it would make damn good ratings, if it was promoted and went into depth about some of this stuff.

I guess I just get a picture of all these TV lawyers getting together at the corner bar after the show and yuking it up together.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:08:34 PM
I wonder if part of the reason they do not talk about the interview with the magazine from ? Panorama could be the copyright laws.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 10:10:48 PM
i feel delicious  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 10:12:19 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Easy,  who are you talking about all being pals?  Isn't it all about the ratings?  Taco can't do crap on reporting the facts.  Joran wrote the book and did the interview.  I think it would make good ratings.  Of course, it is unfortunate to think of getting ratings on something so disgusting, but it's all about keeping her name in the news and shedding the light on what a true f#ck he is!


I think it would make damn good ratings, if it was promoted and went into depth about some of this stuff.

I guess I just get a picture of all these TV lawyers getting together at the corner bar after the show and yuking it up together.


Well, they can yuk it up all they want.  But think about it.  Joran said it, it's in writing with his name on it.  So it's a free for all and there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.  It's not slander,  HE published that crap himself.  If I were Taco,  I'd be crawling into a corner and stay far away from Joran.  He's made Taco look like and idiot and has to be an embarrasment.  I'll be curious to see if he comes out again in support of Joran.  If we are lucky, he DOES crawl into a corner and dumps Joran for client.  What a nightmare for a defense attorney!  No way to bullcrap his way throught that mess!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 02, 2007, 10:12:26 PM
Was that piece on the cover ? Or inside ?
To a casual ******* in a supermarket, what would that look like ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 10:15:05 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
I wonder if part of the reason they do not talk about the interview with the magazine from ? Panorama could be the copyright laws.


I don't think it is, if they give credit to Pamorama.  The MSM quotes magazines all the time.. That would be good "free" advertisement, if promoted properly.   I want Geraldo and Nancy to take it on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 10:15:05 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i feel delicious  8)


(http://bestsmileys.com/eating1/3.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 10:16:28 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
i feel delicious  8)


(http://bestsmileys.com/eating1/3.gif)



 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 10:17:46 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Was that piece on the cover ? Or inside ?
To a casual ******* in a supermarket, what would that look like ?

I don't know but judging by the website, which looks a bit like an xrated National Enquirer, I'd say it was not on the front page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:18:46 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
i feel delicious  8)


(http://bestsmileys.com/eating1/3.gif)



 :lol:


Oh My God is Robots made from CHocky?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 10:19:52 PM
robots is dark chocky


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 10:25:27 PM
very nice dark chocky,very good for monkeys and bad for aruban scum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 10:25:51 PM
Easy,Fairhope is nice


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 10:28:20 PM
i ran everybody off.i will just lurk,had my chicky earler


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 10:31:24 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
i ran everybody off.i will just lurk,had my chicky earler


Wow, everybody DID run off and it's still early.  Probably me Tiger.  I usually have that effect here.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 10:32:35 PM
Hubby just told me he wants to cut my feet off and sell them on eBay for people to carry around as lucky dwarf's feet.  :shock:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:39:42 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
robots is dark chocky


Love dark chocky.

BT , what size shoe do you wear? I am your size I think. I wear nowadays anywhere beween 5 1/2 to 6 1/2.

My ex neighbor also our size wears a size 2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:44:39 PM
I wore a 4 to 4 1/2 for many years but somewhere along the line either shoe sizes changed or I became more interested in comfort. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 10:44:54 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Hubby just told me he wants to cut my feet off and sell them on eBay for people to carry around as lucky dwarf's feet.  :shock:  :lol:  :lol:


If they are truly good luck, give them to Beth! She seems to need some right now!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 10:46:29 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
robots is dark chocky


Love dark chocky.

BT , what size shoe do you wear? I am your size I think. I wear nowadays anywhere beween 5 1/2 to 6 1/2.

My ex neighbor also our size wears a size 2.


Size 4 here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:53:02 PM
Dihannah I was sorry to hear about your birds. I am still hoping they come home to you. Maybe if the new one is outside in its cage the adults will hear it and come be nosy. Just a thought. You know they also may be lost themselves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 10:53:19 PM
My polar bear has size 10,extra wide.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 10:53:49 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
My polar bear has size 10,extra wide.


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 10:56:31 PM
Dihannah ,I think Bt plans on keeping those feet for awhile regardless of what Simon says. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 10:58:41 PM
They could be a nice additon on a rear view mirrow,with the dice


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 11:00:35 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Dihannah I was sorry to hear about your birds. I am still hoping they come home to you. Maybe if the new one is outside in its cage the adults will hear it and come be nosy. Just a thought. You know they also may be lost themselves.


Thanks Sam.  Wow I never thought of that, putting the new bird outside for the chirp sounds.  I'm going to do that tomorrow, since there large cage is still outside waiting for them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 11:01:24 PM
I think a polar bear would have bigger feet than that Tiger.

I am going to skip out for awhile and check out BFN and see if anything is happening there. If I do not make it back have a good night Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 11:02:01 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Dihannah ,I think Bt plans on keeping those feet for awhile regardless of what Simon says. LOL


 :lol:   Yeah, I s'pose.  Can't figure out why she can't share the luck though!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 11:02:21 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
They could be a nice additon on a rear view mirrow,with the dice


You must be related to my hubby and think like him.  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 11:03:24 PM
In total there are 36 users online :: 13 Registered, 0 Hidden and 23 Guests [ Administrator ] [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 183 on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:16 pm
Registered Users: Bobo2, BTgirl, casa, Dihannah1, Easywriter, Hotshot, klaasend, ospainter, Rob, Sam, snoopy, tcumom, Tiger

So where is everybody?  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 02, 2007, 11:03:55 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Dihannah I was sorry to hear about your birds. I am still hoping they come home to you. Maybe if the new one is outside in its cage the adults will hear it and come be nosy. Just a thought. You know they also may be lost themselves.


Thanks Sam.  Wow I never thought of that, putting the new bird outside for the chirp sounds.  I'm going to do that tomorrow, since there large cage is still outside waiting for them.


Just be sure it is in an area where the cats can't get to it. Again Good night


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 11:04:43 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Easy,Fairhope is nice


Yep, Fairhope is a nice place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dihannah1 on June 02, 2007, 11:04:44 PM
Well heading out for the night.  Praying for good news tomorrow!

G'night and sweet dreams you all!  I WUB you all, your all very special!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 11:04:51 PM
oh gosh,justice will arrive when klass is out of town,how will we know


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 11:06:44 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
In total there are 36 users online :: 13 Registered, 0 Hidden and 23 Guests [ Administrator ] [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 183 on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:16 pm
Registered Users: Bobo2, BTgirl, casa, Dihannah1, Easywriter, Hotshot, klaasend, ospainter, Rob, Sam, snoopy, tcumom, Tiger

So where is everybody?  :(


Been away for a bit...just caught up...shoe size seems to be the topic, now?  Think we've been over that many times before.  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 11:07:36 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
In total there are 36 users online :: 13 Registered, 0 Hidden and 23 Guests [ Administrator ] [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 183 on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:16 pm
Registered Users: Bobo2, BTgirl, casa, Dihannah1, Easywriter, Hotshot, klaasend, ospainter, Rob, Sam, snoopy, tcumom, Tiger

So where is everybody?  :(


Been away for a bit...just caught up...shoe size seems to be the topic, now?  Think we've been over that many times before.  LOL


Yeah - I think I'm gonna say I wear a 4 on one foot and 7.5 on the other.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 11:07:36 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
robots is dark chocky


Love dark chocky.

BT , what size shoe do you wear? I am your size I think. I wear nowadays anywhere beween 5 1/2 to 6 1/2.

My ex neighbor also our size wears a size 2.


Size 4 here.


I wear a 10.5, or a 14.  I can't remember....   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 02, 2007, 11:07:45 PM
I left my heart in San francisco...........


BT you may need a stepstool to get onto the cable cars  :lol:

I LOVE San Fran, and Sausalito and Carmel..........all wonderful !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 11:08:41 PM
i am a sixteen with claws,10.5 without


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 11:09:30 PM
:lol: what size you wear.....that's the question...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 11:09:33 PM
i would say what i left in san fran,but ladies are presant


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 11:09:44 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
robots is dark chocky


Love dark chocky.

BT , what size shoe do you wear? I am your size I think. I wear nowadays anywhere beween 5 1/2 to 6 1/2.

My ex neighbor also our size wears a size 2.


Size 4 here.


I wear a 10.5, or a 14.  I can't remember....   8)


 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 02, 2007, 11:10:38 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I left my heart in San francisco...........


BT you may need a stepstool to get onto the cable cars  :lol:

I LOVE San Fran, and Sausalito and Carmel..........all wonderful !


My co-worker is a very tall woman - I'm counting on her to give me a boost.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 02, 2007, 11:10:48 PM
I wore a 9 at age 27 and a 10 at age 30 after the second baby and now I wear a 10.5 so does that make me a suspect too?  :lol:

I do not wear pointy toed shoes like Klaas tho  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 02, 2007, 11:11:32 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
i would say what i left in san fran,but ladies are presant


Good cat... 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 02, 2007, 11:13:11 PM
You may need that boost too BT, even as tall as I am it's a fine art to leap onto those cable cars for they don't stop still for long  :lol:

I actually heard Ella Fitzgerald's last concert at the Fairmont quite a few years ago, most fun trip I ever took was driving from Laguna Niguel to San Fran in a convertible. I still have the most remarkable photos from that trip. I've always loved CA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 02, 2007, 11:13:33 PM
rowl,yes and good nite.see Mr.Brooks, a new film out.could talk in an indirct way about paulus,imo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 11:17:55 PM
FOB must be having a special conference in their hidey hole:

37 users online (30 members, 7 guests, 7 invisible). The most users ever online was 205 on Sat Apr 1st, 2006. The list of members online:
Torti, StatingMyOpinion, islandamethyst, woodville, Acala, sunmoonstars, lila, DiamondDot, BornCynic, WordsofWisdom, Slick, Gad, Shizaru, tuesday, cassidy, prolific2, Constantpeace1, FOB_Lurker, MIP6, eae, Pinellas, arubagal4ever, usnavy8


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 02, 2007, 11:19:12 PM
Hallelujah it's raining outside.........Easy I loved Dreamgirls and it's supposed to be loud for the sistahs get mad  :lol:

I think I'm going to crawl into bed and watch the iron chef's duke it out, looks like beef is on the menu tonight.

I see some are still MIA namely San who has a good excuse for she's sick but

CALLING TYLER AND ANNA YOOOHOOO WE MISS YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!

Easy thanks for those gorgeous photos of the flowers in Fairhope too ! Everyone have a good night's rest and dream of Joran and Anita and Paulus in the pokey !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 02, 2007, 11:20:53 PM
Klaas excuse me but FOB IS A HIDEY HOLE  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I hope SMS is shooting them all bossy PM's just like she used to here to me fussing because we weren't sweet to her beloved bondia  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 11:21:51 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas excuse me but FOB IS A HIDEY HOLE  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I hope SMS is shooting them all bossy PM's just like she used to here to me fussing because we weren't sweet to her beloved bondia  :roll:


They've got to have one.  Too many times there are many online and nobody posting in the "open" area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 11:23:35 PM
FOB - READ THIS

JORAN IS GOING DOWN!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 11:24:29 PM
Why is old Jan harping on the reward?  Can't she just call the AmSouth trust department and ask her questions?  Or call the FBI number given and ask what she has to do to collect the reward?  Or just ask FBI confidant and informant MoonShadows?

FBI Tip Line at 1-877-628-2533

The reward was broken down into two accounts.  One is the recovery fund and one is the reward fund.  The notice says the following:

A $250,000 REWARD HAS BEEN SET ASIDE FOR INFORMATION THAT ULTIMATELY HELPS SOLVE THIS MISSING PERSON CASE.

Next week that will almost double.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 02, 2007, 11:25:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
FOB - READ THIS

JORAN IS GOING DOWN!



oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 11:29:46 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas excuse me but FOB IS A HIDEY HOLE  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I hope SMS is shooting them all bossy PM's just like she used to here to me fussing because we weren't sweet to her beloved bondia  :roll:


I thought FOB was a Boeti Hole!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 02, 2007, 11:32:56 PM
I remember a saying about giving someone enuf rope to hang themselves.
Joran seems to be doing just that with his literary musings.
And, it's been fairly relentless the pounding he is taking... the final blow... I hope the DeVries Show.
I am going to say G'nite monkey mates.
My big toe is a size 4, Miss Tenney Tiny Feeties ! ! !  
Shoes always look so cute on the display rack. Then they bring them out in my size ! ! ! !  ( 9.5 or 10 ) I am tall, so it's not out of proportion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 11:36:02 PM
Nite Kat_Gram


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 02, 2007, 11:39:32 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hallelujah it's raining outside.........Easy I loved Dreamgirls and it's supposed to be loud for the sistahs get mad  :lol:

I think I'm going to crawl into bed and watch the iron chef's duke it out, looks like beef is on the menu tonight.

I see some are still MIA namely San who has a good excuse for she's sick but

CALLING TYLER AND ANNA YOOOHOOO WE MISS YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!

Easy thanks for those gorgeous photos of the flowers in Fairhope too ! Everyone have a good night's rest and dream of Joran and Anita and Paulus in the pokey !!


Sometimes singers try to out do each other with volume and it can get real close to screaming in my opinion.  The American Idol contestant definitely stole the show!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 02, 2007, 11:53:14 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Kimberly Guilfoyle, The Line Up, 6-2-07 … Natalee Holloway, Interview with Jossy Mansur & Linda Allison

W/Video thanks to Carpe!


http://tinyurl.com/2mkh8t


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZSunny on June 03, 2007, 12:10:53 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Kimberly Guilfoyle, The Line Up, 6-2-07 … Natalee Holloway, Interview with Jossy Mansur & Linda Allison

W/Video thanks to Carpe!


http://tinyurl.com/2mkh8t


Hey Carpe and Klaas, are you aware this cuts off the last of the interview?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 12:18:21 AM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Kimberly Guilfoyle, The Line Up, 6-2-07 … Natalee Holloway, Interview with Jossy Mansur & Linda Allison

W/Video thanks to Carpe!


http://tinyurl.com/2mkh8t


Hey Carpe and Klaas, are you aware this cuts off the last of the interview?


Nope but I'll let Carpe know.  Youtube only allows for 10 min so it might be too long.  Could be the best he could do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: sb on June 03, 2007, 01:38:13 AM
Evidently this WON'T be O/T tonight so... have y'all heard about the guy up in ny that was found with 1,500 pairs of stolen young girls' shoes? That is pretty grotesque. The idea of being attracted to a girl's shoes is something I can't fathom. I mean, those can be some dangerous things according to what Klaas told us.

LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: sb on June 03, 2007, 01:59:14 AM
Did everyone decide to go to bed all at once?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: sb on June 03, 2007, 02:10:14 AM
I guess I missed y'all this evening. I am going to call it a day too. Hopefully tomorrow brings SOME good news to those of us who believe that truth and right should come out on top every time!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: carpe noctem on June 03, 2007, 02:50:32 AM
It is a SM FRONTPAGE page

refreshing glitch cutting it short

 Tom is aware of it,

and actively addressing the prob.

...

In the meantime, you can workaround it

by viewing the interview off my

You Tube - Natalee Channel

here:

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=carpen0ktem


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: IBE on June 03, 2007, 05:36:41 AM
Shoe size... 7 1/2 AAA in HS 8 AAA, in college, then an then an 8 narrow  and somewhere a few years ago starting in Perm Dis. about 1996 I became an 8 medium.. must have been in my more "spread out time". :lol:  :lol:

But remember the dress sizes... what was a 14 in 1956 is sure not what is a 14 now... much larger!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: IBE on June 03, 2007, 06:12:38 AM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Tiger"
But I was in Haight/Asbury in 1967,hehe.Plenty of wub,I think.memory is hazy


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I think there are alot of hazy memories of that era.


Mine were hazy, but because I was a baby...  :wink:

Born two weeks before the assasination of JFK.


He was assasinated on my 13th birthday.  :(


Sorry BT, That makes for a sad B-day.  My DH B-day is 9/11,  it was one he'll never forget..


Happy birthday early to your DH.. we share the same birthday date. But the terrorists had to ruin someone's birthday!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: blah on June 03, 2007, 08:49:40 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


 :scratch:

what is this about?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 08:55:52 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


 :scratch:

what is this about?


She's been posting on all the dark blogs about the reward being a scam.  They even made a fake website (then added a disclaimer).  Coincidently, Easy heard the reward will be increased and posted with a full page ad in Diario.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 03, 2007, 09:12:51 AM
What I found interesting about Kimberly's piece on Natalee was this narrator started out telling about the meeting with Antonio Carlo and Karen Jannsen where he tells her that Joran was involved with Natalee's disappearence and it was up to ALE to solve this case. And about where DeVries had secretly taped A.C. and he admitted that he had indeed told that to K.J. IMO it's not that ALE doesn't have any evidence to charge Joran but that ALE just decides not to use any of it. :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: blah on June 03, 2007, 09:16:04 AM
His father said at a certain moment: "Yes Joran, I don't know when you have left and also not when you came back home".


what a joke

he is tipping joran so he doesnt screw up in front of anita


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 09:21:59 AM
Quote from: "blah"
His father said at a certain moment: "Yes Joran, I don't know when you have left and also not when you came back home".


what a joke

he is tipping joran so he doesnt screw up in front of anita


Blah, even if that is true and not a bunch of hooey to make Anita also culpable... at some point she has to be brought into the 'inner circle' or her sporter is going to jail should she mess up.
She's involved after the fact in my opinion....

And who knows what she heard on phone call to Holland before she went back to Aruba.

If I had a wife and she was on vacation and a major problem occurred while she was gone, you can bet I would pick up the phone and call her...It's human nature...everyone would make a call or two to their spouse.... or in her case.. louse.

Good Morning Everyone... maybe today is the DAY!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:28:11 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
EASY - to answer your question in the other thread.  I have let Red know and I'm sure others have told the family.


I hope they do know and I wish there was something that could be done about that garbage.  Is this just a Medley thing, or did someone put her up to this one?  Or, did one of the nutz call in with a tip to look in MB and expected a payday?


 :scratch:

what is this about?


She's been posting on all the dark blogs about the reward being a scam.  They even made a fake website (then added a disclaimer).  Coincidently, Easy heard the reward will be increased and posted with a full page ad in Diario.  :roll:


Yes, I have been told that the reward for info will be increased substantially and a request was made to the Diario that an ad be run to announce the change.  Jossy agreed to run the ad for a week.  Not sure it will be a full page ad.  Didn't get into those details.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:28:57 AM
GEL - I have always thought ALE had loads of evidence on Joran that they simply decided not use. It's the same kind of corruption that's found all over the world.

I once had a job where one of my co-workers was totally useless. She didn't show up for work for days at a time. When she did show up, half the time she was drunk or hungover. She was theoretically doing work at home, but her secretary lived with her, and it was a commonly know fact that the secretary did all the work. The co-worker spent most of her time having parties at her home where drugs flowed freely. The most amazing thing, though, is that on the few occasions when she did show up at work, she would always say that as long as the current governor was in office she would have a job.

You see, we worked for a government-related entity, and her mother was dating the governor of the state. And, the co-worker turned out to be correct. As long as that governor  was in office, she could get away with anything. As soon as a different governor was elected, she went to prison for stealing funds from her department at work.

Moral of the story - replace the MEP officials who are part of Aruban corruption, and Joran would probably be in jail in a heartbeat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: blah on June 03, 2007, 09:29:30 AM
Joran asked his father: Dad if they find the girl at the lighthouse we are in trouble.His father answerd: "Yes then you are in trouble because you have stated that you have been there with the girl".

Paulus does it again here


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 09:34:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Jon at Scrux:

Deepak June 15 statement (page 119)

Joran asked me what we had to do at the police. I had told him that both of us would have to drive the route. He then said that he also was called by the police and that he had to drive that route also.
We walked around in the garden of the Racquet Club. During the walk I asked him if he had done something to the girl. Joran said he had done nothing with the girl. He then said it would be better that we left "because if the police sees us together they are going to think that we are discussing something"
On that same day we went to Joran's home after he had called us and told us he was ready at the police. We went to his house around 9 pm. There we found Joran's father and mother in the room. Joran's mother said: Hello guys, come in", I have to "tap you on your fingers" because you are having problems again". With that she meant that a week prior we had had a fight at Carlos and Charlies. I had an argument with a guy and the police had come. Joran's mother said: "the last half year Joran is having problems all the time, a few months ago he pushed a guy through a vitrine of the cinema."
When that happened I did not knew Joran yet. His mother also said that Joran is always in the casinos and that they as parents had not raised him like that.
"And now you are in trouble again. Don't you see how serious this problem is? If something has happened to the girl, then you are in a lot of trouble" She looked at me and my brother and said: You also. You went out on a Sunday night. Does your mother know you went out?" I told her my mother did not know, because we had left before she had arrived home. She said to Joran:"You Joran have sneaked out, your father did not even know that you had went out". This is correct since when we had picked Joran up that day, he had told us that his father was asleep and his mother was in Holland.
His father said at a certain moment: "Yes Joran, I don't know when you have left and also not when you came back home".
After this his mother said to us: "Boys you will have to go home soon". She felt we should not be out on the streets untill late.
We also should not go in the neighbourhood of the Marriott, because the police would control for sure, and you never know what can happen. After that she said that Joran had to go to sleep. Joran asked if he could talk a little with us. His mother said: if you can keep it short".
After that his parents left. Joran said the situation was a little difficult. I told him that it was a serious matter.But we still decided to continue lying.

Deepak statement (page 123)

Tuesday June 2 I went to wotk. At around eleven Joran called me. He said that there were people at his school who were putting up posters of the missing girl. He told me that on the posters it was mentioned the girl was kidnapped and that ppl should ask Joran how and what.(Joran): As it seems the situation is getting worse. My father has looked for a lawyer for me".
I told him we would talk later. I went that day around 4 pm to Joran's house, Freddy and his father Paulus were there also.
I sat down and his father asked if I had problems at my job. He told me that ppl had went to and put up posters at Joran's school.
He said that he had arranged for lawyer Anthony Carlo for Joran. He asked me if I had a lawyer, I told him no. He asked me if I knew a lawyer, I told him I did not knew any lawyers because I had no experience with lawyers.
I stayed for an hour, we listened to the radio and watched tv. That day there was a search for the girl.
After a while Joran's mother came into the room. When she was in the room I heard her talk to someone who was involved in the search. I heard Joran's mother say they were buisy searching at the lighthouse. On a certain moment Joran asked his father: Dad if they find the girl at the lighthouse we are in trouble.His father answerd: "Yes then you are in trouble because you have stated that you have been there with the girl".
Joran asked his father after that: And if they don't find a body? His father answered: No, if they don't find a body then you are not that much into trouble. I asked: Is it just like in the VS that if they do not have a body that they do not have a case against you? Joran said: It is just like in the VS. If they don't have a body, if they don't have a weapon, if they don't have clothes with blood on it, if they don't have fingerprints, then they cannot start a case. Before I left Joran;s father asked me if i could ask my mother to call him.

Joran June 13 statement (Page 158)

Around 3 am I call Deepak and ask him to pick me up. He asks where the girl is. I say that she is on the beach sleeping and does not want to listen to me.
He would come immediately. I wake her up and tell her that I am going to bring her back to her hotel. She refuses and goes back to sleep. I wonder if I better pick her up and take her. I am lying down for 10 minutes next to Natalee, while she is sleeping. I am not saying anything to her because her eyes are closed. When I hear Deepak's car arriving I wake her up once more, again she does not want to come with me to her hotel. I stand up and walk to the car.

The someone involved in the search that Anita was talking to would be Julia Renfro.

Good Morning Everyone and thank you for your get well wishes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:34:21 AM
When a law firm requests donation for the legal defense of a particular client, do they have to make any type of disclosure about those funds?  If not, how would anyone know how the money is being spent?

Also, why do the offices of Taco Joe list the van der slots as one of their notable criminal cases, when Taco represented them in a civil action?

I think a web site should be created demanding accountability!   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:37:32 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"

She's been posting on all the dark blogs about the reward being a scam.  They even made a fake website (then added a disclaimer).  Coincidently, Easy heard the reward will be increased and posted with a full page ad in Diario.  :roll:


There seems to be so much hoo-hah at some of the other sites about the reward money that I wouldn't be at all surprised if someone didn't try to claim it. I can picture someone saying that they deserve the reward because they have information that would help solve the case, then getting ticked when told that saying Natalee ran away with a blue eyed Dutch boy was not helpful information.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:40:19 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

She's been posting on all the dark blogs about the reward being a scam.  They even made a fake website (then added a disclaimer).  Coincidently, Easy heard the reward will be increased and posted with a full page ad in Diario.  :roll:


There seems to be so much hoo-hah at some of the other sites about the reward money that I wouldn't be at all surprised if someone didn't try to claim it. I can picture someone saying that they deserve the reward because they have information that would help solve the case, then getting ticked when told that saying Natalee ran away with a blue eyed Dutch boy was not helpful information.  :roll:


That's what I'm thinking too and Scrux pretty much said that he deserved some reward money in that long FOB post.  Then SandraK said she deserved some of the money too. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:40:47 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
When a law firm requests donation for the legal defense of a particular client, do they have to make any type of disclosure about those funds?  If not, how would anyone know how the money is being spent?

Also, why do the offices of Taco Joe list the van der slots as one of their notable criminal cases, when Taco represented them in a civil action?

I think a web site should be created demanding accountability!   8)


I agree. And I think someone who has a blog should address that issue. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 09:45:52 AM
Good morning-

good to see San catching that point, it likely was Renfro also giving Anita a blow-by-blow of every breath Beth Twitty took.

Easy you are right about accountability on a website but if you are so proud of being branded 1-800-save-my-A$$ that you emblazon it on your front page, it's likely you really do not care one iota about accountability or integrity but only DOLLARS.

BT you likely made a good point but was your governor driving the entire state into a stand-off between the motherland that holds your financial gonads and Chavez seeing you as ripe for the picking? Either Oduber thinks naively he's smart enough to play ball with Chavez or he's an idiot - there are no other alternatives.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:47:28 AM
All the reward questions did cause me to do some searches and I did not find the particulars about any of the trust accounts setup for missing persons, or any other reward.  Most just give contact info to the financial institute managing the trust and direct readers to contact them for details.  I’ve never given it much thought, because I have never tried to collect a reward for anything.

My thoughts are that before a web site is setup that questions the integrity of anyone, those phone calls should be made and every attempt should be made to verify the info.  If those actions are not taken, then the author of the web site and all involved should be crushed like bugs for trying to defame the victims of a horrendous crime.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 09:50:59 AM
Good Morning  (http://deephousepage.com/smilies/yawn.gif)

SAN
Hope you are feeling better [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 09:51:29 AM
Easy I think needs Meds badly is grasping at straws now, I also think if the reward is raised substantially she may be fighting a losing battle. If anything the citizens of Aruba have learned from Oduber by now, follow the money?

I wish they would kick in asylum to whoever talks similar to our witness protection program and then perhaps it would be worth the risk for them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:53:20 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
When a law firm requests donation for the legal defense of a particular client, do they have to make any type of disclosure about those funds?  If not, how would anyone know how the money is being spent?

Also, why do the offices of Taco Joe list the van der slots as one of their notable criminal cases, when Taco represented them in a civil action?

I think a web site should be created demanding accountability!   8)


I agree. And I think someone who has a blog should address that issue. 8)


I honestly do not understand all the new age paypal donation business.  I do know that I can’t put a label on a bunch of cans asking people to donate to the “Mike Needs a New Truck Fund” and put those cans at merchant's all over town.  The cops would swoop down on me in a heartbeat.  Not sure what makes the difference.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:53:49 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Good morning-

good to see San catching that point, it likely was Renfro also giving Anita a blow-by-blow of every breath Beth Twitty took.

Easy you are right about accountability on a website but if you are so proud of being branded 1-800-save-my-A$$ that you emblazon it on your front page, it's likely you really do not care one iota about accountability or integrity but only DOLLARS.

BT you likely made a good point but was your governor driving the entire state into a stand-off between the motherland that holds your financial gonads and Chavez seeing you as ripe for the picking? Either Oduber thinks naively he's smart enough to play ball with Chavez or he's an idiot - there are no other alternatives.


I agree with what you're saying about Oduber and Chavez, None. Also, I think the degree of corruption that Oduber is exhibiting has infiltrated all the way from the top to the bottom. A cover up in a tourist's murder is symptomatic of the whole general failure of government in Aruba, just as my co-worker's misbehavior was symptomatic of larger issues in our state government. When the guy at the top is known to be corrupt, the people on down the chain of command feel a freedom to do the same, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 09:54:04 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Good morning-

good to see San catching that point, it likely was Renfro also giving Anita a blow-by-blow of every breath Beth Twitty took.

Easy you are right about accountability on a website but if you are so proud of being branded 1-800-save-my-A$$ that you emblazon it on your front page, it's likely you really do not care one iota about accountability or integrity but only DOLLARS.

BT you likely made a good point but was your governor driving the entire state into a stand-off between the motherland that holds your financial gonads and Chavez seeing you as ripe for the picking? Either Oduber thinks naively he's smart enough to play ball with Chavez or he's an idiot - there are no other alternatives.

Oduber is a moron.  What I have come to notice is that Rudy Croes is the one with the power on that island.  Oduber is a puppet.

Rudy Croes = DIRTY HAND


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 09:55:24 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Good Morning  (http://deephousepage.com/smilies/yawn.gif)

SAN
Hope you are feeling better [/b]

I am feeling a little better this morning OF.  Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:57:11 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Easy I think needs Meds badly is grasping at straws now, I also think if the reward is raised substantially she may be fighting a losing battle. If anything the citizens of Aruba have learned from Oduber by now, follow the money?

I wish they would kick in asylum to whoever talks similar to our witness protection program and then perhaps it would be worth the risk for them?


That's a good point!  With that kind of money most poor people living in Aruba could go back to their homeland and live like kings.  Or at least get a life time supply of drugs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 09:57:21 AM
Easy  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Mike needs a new truck fund? too funny

BT you are right, hard to believe the governor in TN allowed that but I do agree it's corruption run amuck and in both cases it appears the governors simply get away with it.

San you may well be right for RCroes seems to be totally fearless, even post being accused of sexual slavery by those women. The moment those judges from Holland started arriving he started screaming accusations too. So who is RCroes in bed with that would allow him to be so fearless? I want to know !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:57:36 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
When a law firm requests donation for the legal defense of a particular client, do they have to make any type of disclosure about those funds?  If not, how would anyone know how the money is being spent?

Also, why do the offices of Taco Joe list the van der slots as one of their notable criminal cases, when Taco represented them in a civil action?

I think a web site should be created demanding accountability!   8)


I agree. And I think someone who has a blog should address that issue. 8)


I honestly do not understand all the new age paypal donation business.  I do know that I can’t put a label on a bunch of cans asking people to donate to the “Mike Needs a New Truck Fund” and put those cans at merchant's all over town.  The cops would swoop down on me in a heartbeat.  Not sure what makes the difference.


Actually, are you sure you couldn't put cans all over town asking for donations for a new truck? I see cans and jars at the cash registers in stores all over town asking for contributions for all sorts of things. I used to be on the board of a group that raised money to help animals. We were a legitimate nonprofit, but no one ever asked us to prove that when we used to ask merchants to let us left cans by their cash registers.

Maybe you should try that truck donation thing and see how much money you get. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 10:01:13 AM
With gas prices what they are now, you'd need a separate can for gas for the truck too  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 10:02:30 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
With gas prices what they are now, you'd need a separate can for gas for the truck too  :lol:  :lol:


I vote for having the can say "Mike's Vehicle Fund." That way, he could pay for gas and insurance out of it too.  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:07:09 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
When a law firm requests donation for the legal defense of a particular client, do they have to make any type of disclosure about those funds?  If not, how would anyone know how the money is being spent?

Also, why do the offices of Taco Joe list the van der slots as one of their notable criminal cases, when Taco represented them in a civil action?

I think a web site should be created demanding accountability!   8)


I agree. And I think someone who has a blog should address that issue. 8)


I honestly do not understand all the new age paypal donation business.  I do know that I can’t put a label on a bunch of cans asking people to donate to the “Mike Needs a New Truck Fund” and put those cans at merchant's all over town.  The cops would swoop down on me in a heartbeat.  Not sure what makes the difference.


Actually, are you sure you couldn't put cans all over town asking for donations for a new truck? I see cans and jars at the cash registers in stores all over town asking for contributions for all sorts of things. I used to be on the board of a group that raised money to help animals. We were a legitimate nonprofit, but no one ever asked us to prove that when we used to ask merchants to let us left cans by their cash registers.

Maybe you should try that truck donation thing and see how much money you get. :lol:


I think you have to get some type of permit to put those cans out and they have to be ligetimate. 8)

I think you have to get some type of permit to put those cans out and they have to be legitimate.  I remember not long ago some people were putting out cans for various children in need of medical attention, etc.  They were doing it so frequently with a never ending supply of kid names and faces on the cans.  It caused someone to ask questions that started an investigation and it was a fraud.

Now, I need to get busy and go start my “Mike Needs a Truck” web site.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:09:00 AM
I'm also starting a Mike Needs More Coffee account so he can type.  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 10:11:53 AM
Hey I need coffee too particularly since my last birthday, seems I can't fully open my eyes without some which is really bad !  :lol:

I don't want to rub this in but ya'll it's rained all night and is still raining, it's the most blessed sound and smell too. We so needed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 10:13:01 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm also starting a Mike Needs More Coffee account so he can type.  lol


While you're doing that, would you please put a link to an account for BT Wants To Build A New Deck?  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:13:30 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"

Moral of the story - replace the MEP officials who are part of Aruban corruption, and Joran would probably be in jail in a heartbeat.


BT- see you are a genius!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 10:14:06 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey I need coffee too particularly since my last birthday, seems I can't fully open my eyes without some which is really bad !  :lol:

I don't want to rub this in but ya'll it's rained all night and is still raining, it's the most blessed sound and smell too. We so needed it.


No rain here, and we're still 23 inches below. :(

Which reminds me - I have to go outside and water some flowers. See you monkeys later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 10:16:54 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "BTgirl"

Moral of the story - replace the MEP officials who are part of Aruban corruption, and Joran would probably be in jail in a heartbeat.


BT- see you are a genius!!!


Why, thank you ever so much, kind sir. Little old me is just flustered over all this attention.   :oops: (Fans self like a southern belle)  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 10:20:24 AM
Good morning.  Getting ready for a 2nd cup of coffee....only had to read a couple pages to catch up from last night.

San, that Deepak statement about Anita on the phone with someone involved in the search stood out for me last night & I posted that Julia came to mind, as well.  Glad you are feeling a little better.

Carpe, thanks for the link to your Youtube.

Question....was it Rudy Croes that turned the case over to the Dutch investigators, or am I confusing officials?  Considering the article about his desire for separation from NL, it would seem contradictory...or maybe not, if they come up short as ALE did.  

Guess I'll go get that coffee, now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:21:52 AM
I'm getting a big kick outta these trolls wanting the reward. This is really funny IMO...

These are the same people that accused me and some others of following this case for the reward.

Let's say I did solve this case, (it's solved in my opinion)... I would donate any money to TES and Missing and Exploited Children.

Once Jamie told me that anyone who solves a case is legitimately entitled to the reward... that's why it's there.... but for most of us we are not following Natalee's case for a reward... we only want to see Justice. Nothing more nothing less.

Most of us would not feel right taking a reward for doing the RIGHT THING.

That's the difference in the mind set you see.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Mere on June 03, 2007, 10:23:57 AM
Good morning friends.... :D

Hate to hide but I have a lot of catching up to do....San, glad to see you...!
Looks like Joran's words (and ego) are going to do him in....hope to be up to speed soon....Mere


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 10:25:04 AM
Quote from: "blah"
His father said at a certain moment: "Yes Joran, I don't know when you have left and also not when you came back home".


what a joke

he is tipping joran so he doesnt screw up in front of anita


Not for Anita.  For the K2.  Emphasized enough, that Deepak remembered it two weeks later.  Maybe that's why he was so surprised to hear that Paulus helped, "your own father".  Freddy knew and "should tell the truth".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:25:18 AM
Goodmorning all!

For those of you with the stomach to do so, please go to RU and the nataleehollowayreward.com thread and look at Abarth's last post.  

Looks as though he's implying he got the link from SM, which of course is a lie but he sure went to alot of trouble to imply it. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:27:29 AM
Someone at RU made a nice tribute to the Monkeys in the reward thread.  Question is, why did BT’s avatar show up twice?  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:32:12 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning all!

For those of you with the stomach to do so, please go to RU and the nataleehollowayreward.com thread and look at Abarth's last post.  

Looks as though he's implying he got the link from SM, which of course is a lie but he sure went to alot of trouble to imply it. :shock:


LMAO!!!! my status must be slippin' :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 10:34:54 AM
Quote from: Easywriter
When a law firm requests donation for the legal defense of a particular client, do they have to make any type of disclosure about those funds?  If not, how would anyone know how the money is being spent?

Also, why do the offices of Taco Joe list the van der slots as one of their notable criminal cases, when Taco represented them in a civil action?

I think a web site should be created demanding accountability!   8)[/
[/i]quote]


I agree.  Maybe Abath and Medley will post it at their site (if Glenda says it's ok).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:36:02 AM
What will we learn from Dr. Hodges tonight?  Can we send Dana some short, sweet questions to ask the guy?  Or has he already read our thoughts?   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:36:44 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
What will we learn from Dr. Hodges tonight?  Can we send Dana some short, sweet questions to ask the guy?  Or has he already read our thoughts?   :shock:


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 10:37:08 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Goodmorning all!

For those of you with the stomach to do so, please go to RU and the nataleehollowayreward.com thread and look at Abarth's last post.  

Looks as though he's implying he got the link from SM, which of course is a lie but he sure went to alot of trouble to imply it. :shock:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 10:38:22 AM
When I looked, I noted the date & time of the post.  It says 6/1/07 6:15pm.....when I went back and checked when Klaas posted it here, it says 6/1/07 at 6:09pm.....

Could this be why it's implied?  I know I went there to read, after it was brought up here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 10:38:44 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Someone at RU made a nice tribute to the Monkeys in the reward thread.  Question is, why did BT’s avatar show up twice?  :shock:


Cause I'm the cutest? :lol:

M***R Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:29 am    

Abarth when you put all of those pics up on one place it is in deed a scary site. And I would imagine that they all probably picked pics pretty close to the real thing! OMG you are creative Abarth! Well done!


I would just like to respond to that comment that I DO look exactly like my avatar, and Easy does too. We are proud of our distinct family characteristics, and know that those who make unkind comments are simply envious  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:43:59 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Someone at RU made a nice tribute to the Monkeys in the reward thread.  Question is, why did BT’s avatar show up twice?  :shock:


Cause I'm the cutest? :lol:

M***R Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:29 am    

Abarth when you put all of those pics up on one place it is in deed a scary site. And I would imagine that they all probably picked pics pretty close to the real thing! OMG you are creative Abarth! Well done!


I would just like to respond to that comment that I DO look exactly like my avatar, and Easy does too. We are proud of our distinct family characteristics, and know that those who make unkind comments are simply envious  :wink:


Yes, I look just like my avatar and Jan's post is clearly a display of bigotry and prejudicial treatment of a particular sector of society!   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:44:02 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
When I looked, I noted the date & time of the post.  It says 6/1/07 6:15pm.....when I went back and checked when Klaas posted it here, it says 6/1/07 at 6:09pm.....

Could this be why it's implied?  I know I went there to read, after it was brought up here.


Huh?  How could it be PM anything?  FYI - the time on my post reads 7:25am to me because I'm set up for pacific time.  Unless you log into Refugees the time you see will not be the correct time.  The time I see on Abarth's post is 9:19am (without logging in).

Edited to add:  If I were to log in and set my correct time it would have said 7:19am,  6 minutes prior to me posting it here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:45:21 AM
About Dr. Andrew G. Hodges
•Board certified psychiatrist (American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology)

•Former Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine

•Outstanding Clinician’s Award 1995, International Society of Communicative Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy
 
•Member, American Psychiatric Association

•Private Practice of Psychiatry (including Forensic Psychiatry) Birmingham, Alabama


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:46:25 AM
Deetch had a new post yesterday... in case you have not seen it....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 10:46:39 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Someone at RU made a nice tribute to the Monkeys in the reward thread.  Question is, why did BT’s avatar show up twice?  :shock:


Cause I'm the cutest? :lol:

M***R Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:29 am    

Abarth when you put all of those pics up on one place it is in deed a scary site. And I would imagine that they all probably picked pics pretty close to the real thing! OMG you are creative Abarth! Well done!


I would just like to respond to that comment that I DO look exactly like my avatar, and Easy does too. We are proud of our distinct family characteristics, and know that those who make unkind comments are simply envious  :wink:


Yes, I look just like my avatar and Jan's post is clearly a display of bigotry and prejudicial treatment of a particular sector of society!   8)


Absolutely, Easy! I believe I might see a lawsuit in someone's future.  :wink:

Maybe we could start a website to collect donations to pay the attorney.  Think Taco would be interested in taking the case?  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 10:48:27 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
When I looked, I noted the date & time of the post.  It says 6/1/07 6:15pm.....when I went back and checked when Klaas posted it here, it says 6/1/07 at 6:09pm.....

Could this be why it's implied?  I know I went there to read, after it was brought up here.


Huh?  How could it be PM anything?  FYI - the time on my post reads 7:25am to me because I'm set up for pacific time.  Unless you log into Refugees the time you see will not be the correct time.  The time I see on Abarth's post is 9:19am (without logging in).


I see the same time not logged in for Abarth's post.  I was referring to the original post made by Abarth, not the current one.   So, if I don't log in here, it won't be the right time?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:50:04 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
About Dr. Andrew G. Hodges
•Board certified psychiatrist (American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology)

•Former Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine

•Outstanding Clinician’s Award 1995, International Society of Communicative Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy
 
•Member, American Psychiatric Association

•Private Practice of Psychiatry (including Forensic Psychiatry) Birmingham, Alabama


I know of two BOARDS he could certify.  :D

He could do group session and charge like 100 per hour and they could all pass around the LOVE Sieve.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:50:42 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
When I looked, I noted the date & time of the post.  It says 6/1/07 6:15pm.....when I went back and checked when Klaas posted it here, it says 6/1/07 at 6:09pm.....

Could this be why it's implied?  I know I went there to read, after it was brought up here.


Huh?  How could it be PM anything?  FYI - the time on my post reads 7:25am to me because I'm set up for pacific time.  Unless you log into Refugees the time you see will not be the correct time.  The time I see on Abarth's post is 9:19am (without logging in).


I see the same time not logged in for Abarth's post.  I was referring to the original post made by Abarth, not the current one.   So, if I don't log in here, it won't be the right time?

That's correct, if you don't log in you won't get the correct time unless that time happens to be in your time zone.  Looks like the forum is set to Central time because without logging in it's 2 hours ahead of my time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:51:54 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Someone at RU made a nice tribute to the Monkeys in the reward thread.  Question is, why did BT’s avatar show up twice?  :shock:


Cause I'm the cutest? :lol:

M***R Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:29 am    

Abarth when you put all of those pics up on one place it is in deed a scary site. And I would imagine that they all probably picked pics pretty close to the real thing! OMG you are creative Abarth! Well done!


I would just like to respond to that comment that I DO look exactly like my avatar, and Easy does too. We are proud of our distinct family characteristics, and know that those who make unkind comments are simply envious  :wink:


Yes, I look just like my avatar and Jan's post is clearly a display of bigotry and prejudicial treatment of a particular sector of society!   8)


Absolutely, Easy! I believe I might see a lawsuit in someone's future.  :wink:

Maybe we could start a website to collect donations to pay the attorney.  Think Taco would be interested in taking the case?  :D


I'm sure he would be interested in taking the donations!   :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:53:35 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
About Dr. Andrew G. Hodges
•Board certified psychiatrist (American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology)

•Former Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine

•Outstanding Clinician’s Award 1995, International Society of Communicative Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy
 
•Member, American Psychiatric Association

•Private Practice of Psychiatry (including Forensic Psychiatry) Birmingham, Alabama


I know of two BOARDS he could certify.  :D

He could do group session and charge like 100 per hour and they could all pass around the LOVE Sieve.


Yep, those boards are definitely certifiable! lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:56:44 AM
Posted by eae at FOB - this ought to bring SandraK out :lol:


eae wrote:
Posted: Sun Jun 3rd, 2007 07:45 am   Quote     Reply  
 
Hey Everyone,

I have seen so much mention of a guy named Lorenzo...who, exactly, is he, and what does he have to do with this case? I'm confused


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 10:56:54 AM
DeVries should be on in about 30 min.  Wonder if Robert will see/hear anything new.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:57:05 AM
Can't find the original source for this, but it is still interesting.

Natalee Holloway: Analysis Suggests Drugging And Gang Rape Involved

Dr. Andrew Hodges, a forensic psychiatrist, has begun to analyze some of what documented facts and statements are available in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway - that analysis suggests that both Deepak Kalpoe and Joran Van der Sloot may have been involved in a planned scheme which included the drugging and gang raping of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway. He is currently preparing a full report for the family of Natalee Holloway.

Thoughtprint decoding is reading between the lines for unconscious messages, called "thoughtprints,".

A recent breakthrough to the unconscious mind reveals it is strikingly honest and far brighter than the conscious mind and that criminals are strongly inclined toward unconscious confession.

To decode thoughtprints one must be attuned to a suspect's unconsciously patterned ideas and not his literal conscious statements. The conscious mind speaks literally ("left brain") about certain issues, the unconscious mind speaks symbolically ("right brain") about deeper issues facts via thoughtprints.

Thoughtprints: Joran indirectly warned the girls from Mountain Brook High School including Natalee Holloway around 9 pm at the Holiday Inn Casino-- "Don't go to Carlos and Charlies, it's no fun on Sunday night." This suggests an unconscious protective warning, knowing that he was up to something (a group rape as he suggests).

Natalee Drugged: Joran spontaneously reported that Natalee was on drugs at C and C suggesting she indeed was drugged there. Deepak's thoughtprints also suggest Natalee had been drugged - reporting that he had lied to police because missing girls "usually show up at a crack house (sic)."

Both suspects independently introduced drugs's suggesting they drugged her in addition to the alcohol she had consumed. There are rumors of bartenders cooperating in such a scenario.

Natalee Resisted a Group Rape: Joran and Deepak both referenced the idea of sex being refused ("Joran said he refused Natalee sex in the back seat at one point, Deepak prohibited Joran and Natalee from sexual contact telling them to go get a hotel room) and of Natalee refusing to be touched while on the ground when she fell.


All of this strongly suggests sexual activity and touch being refused and that she put up a fight while held down and that there was both verbal and physical resistance.

A particularly striking story of Natalee falling-- physically out of control on the ground and intoxicated linked with the moment of separation (death)-- suggests loss of control through drugs, rape and finally through death.

Additional analysis, some anticipated to be discussed this week on Court TV with more going directly to the family, is pending. In speaking with Dr. Hodges, it was at least suggested at this point that, based upon other reports, along with the drugging, such a crime may have included luring Natalee Holloway away from the front of Carlos and Charlie's on foot.

Dr. Hodges "Thought Print" work was involved to some extent in profiling the BTK serial killer. His credentials include being certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. He is a former Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine and received the Outstanding Clinician’s Award in 1995 from the International Society of Communicative Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy. He is also a member of the American Psychiatric Association.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:58:40 AM
I tend to agree with much of what the guy has to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:59:10 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
DeVries should be on in about 30 min.  Wonder if Robert will see/hear anything new.

I thought DeVries came on at 11:30am my time.  That would be in 3 1/2 hours (I could be wrong)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 11:00:18 AM
Well I need to go write out bills :smt009  :smt100
and daughter just woke up so I can make some noise around here.

Have fun monkeys

SeeeYaaaByeeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 11:01:49 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
DeVries should be on in about 30 min.  Wonder if Robert will see/hear anything new.

I thought DeVries came on at 11:30am my time.  That would be in 3 1/2 hours (I could be wrong)  :wink:


No, you're right.  ? 8:30 pm Holland time?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:03:50 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
DeVries should be on in about 30 min.  Wonder if Robert will see/hear anything new.

I thought DeVries came on at 11:30am my time.  That would be in 3 1/2 hours (I could be wrong)  :wink:


No, you're right.  ? 8:30 pm Holland time?


20:30 Holland time so that's 8:30pm right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 11:04:59 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
DeVries should be on in about 30 min.  Wonder if Robert will see/hear anything new.

I thought DeVries came on at 11:30am my time.  That would be in 3 1/2 hours (I could be wrong)  :wink:


No, you're right.  ? 8:30 pm Holland time?


20:30 Holland time so that's 8:30pm right?


yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:05:08 AM
I didn't realize that many of us have been doing "thought prints" for the past two years!

The falling down stuff has always stuck out in my mind and to me it indicated some type of trauma Natalee suffered that night/morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 11:08:42 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I didn't realize that many of us have been doing "thought prints" for the past two years!

The falling down stuff has always stuck out in my mind and to me it indicated some type of trauma Natalee suffered that night/morning.


Hodges also uses examples on his website with 'shark' references...eery coincidence?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 11:08:52 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I didn't realize that many of us have been doing "thought prints" for the past two years!

The falling down stuff has always stuck out in my mind and to me it indicated some type of trauma Natalee suffered that night/morning.


Right along with seeing the stars, that weren't out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 11:11:32 AM
Klaas
Scrux changed Deepak's statement from Tuesday June 2 to Thursday June 2.  They certainly spend a lot of time around the Racquet Club.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:12:46 AM
I think there were some car wrecks in Aruba yesterday.   :shock:

24ora also covered the JFK terroism story, but they mention Aruba for some reason.

E terroristanan lo mester tin lazonan fuerte na Trinidad. Esaki ta hopi alarmante mirando cu Trinidad ta algun miya leeuw for di Aruba.

Being language impaired has become a pain in the butt over the past two years.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:13:41 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas
Scrux changed Deepak's statement from Tuesday June 2 to Thursday June 2.  They certainly spend a lot of time around the Racquet Club.

Thanks, I corrected it in our Important Case Document area as well. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 11:15:03 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I think there were some car wrecks in Aruba yesterday.   :shock:

24ora also covered the JFK terroism story, but they mention Aruba for some reason.

E terroristanan lo mester tin lazonan fuerte na Trinidad. Esaki ta hopi alarmante mirando cu Trinidad ta algun miya leeuw for di Aruba.

Being language impaired has become a pain in the butt over the past two years.   :?


Don't you have a papiamentu workbook, in your collection??  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:19:18 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I didn't realize that many of us have been doing "thought prints" for the past two years!

The falling down stuff has always stuck out in my mind and to me it indicated some type of trauma Natalee suffered that night/morning.


Hodges also uses examples on his website with 'shark' references...eery coincidence?


What does he say about sharks.  That has always been so crazy and yet it has been around from the beginning.  Wants to go see sharks at 1:30 in the morning after dancing the night away with her classmates.  Only in Aruba would someone come up with that BS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:21:24 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I think there were some car wrecks in Aruba yesterday.   :shock:

24ora also covered the JFK terroism story, but they mention Aruba for some reason.

E terroristanan lo mester tin lazonan fuerte na Trinidad. Esaki ta hopi alarmante mirando cu Trinidad ta algun miya leeuw for di Aruba.

Being language impaired has become a pain in the butt over the past two years.   :?


I think what they are saying is Trinidad is not that far from Aruba maybe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:22:42 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I think there were some car wrecks in Aruba yesterday.   :shock:

24ora also covered the JFK terroism story, but they mention Aruba for some reason.

E terroristanan lo mester tin lazonan fuerte na Trinidad. Esaki ta hopi alarmante mirando cu Trinidad ta algun miya leeuw for di Aruba.

Being language impaired has become a pain in the butt over the past two years.   :?


Don't you have a papiamentu workbook, in your collection??  :lol:


Yeah, but it is a pain in the arse to use. lol  The words can have multiple meanings and then the same word with another word added changes the meaning again.  I gave up trying to figure stuff out with that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:24:23 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I think there were some car wrecks in Aruba yesterday.   :shock:

24ora also covered the JFK terroism story, but they mention Aruba for some reason.

E terroristanan lo mester tin lazonan fuerte na Trinidad. Esaki ta hopi alarmante mirando cu Trinidad ta algun miya leeuw for di Aruba.

Being language impaired has become a pain in the butt over the past two years.   :?


I think what they are saying is Trinidad is not that far from Aruba maybe?


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/ArubaTrinidad.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 11:28:53 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I didn't realize that many of us have been doing "thought prints" for the past two years!

The falling down stuff has always stuck out in my mind and to me it indicated some type of trauma Natalee suffered that night/morning.


Hodges also uses examples on his website with 'shark' references...eery coincidence?


What does he say about sharks.  That has always been so crazy and yet it has been around from the beginning.  Wants to go see sharks at 1:30 in the morning after dancing the night away with her classmates.  Only in Aruba would someone come up with that BS.


What is a “Thoughtprint?”
A thoughtprint is unconscious communication hidden within verbal or written communication.

The unconscious mind is communicates constantly and typically hides its messages in verbal or written communication generated by the conscious mind. We don’t always say what we mean. These unconscious communications are what is called Thoughtprints.

To understand thoughtprints and discern what is really being said we must pay attention to the big idea, not necessarily the literal idea. Pay attention to the subject a person introduces. The subject may introduce it through denial: “There are no sharks on the island.” Or by linking it to someone else: “Beverly was talking about seeing the sharks.” The key idea in this case is “sharks.” By paying close attention to the big ideas we get a clear idea what subject matter is on the speakers mind.

Every idea introduced must be taken as an unconscious part of them: They are unconsciously talking about themselves. In the above case the key thoughtprint “sharks” could suggest that the speaker is confessing he is the shark.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/thoughtprint.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:29:29 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I think there were some car wrecks in Aruba yesterday.   :shock:

24ora also covered the JFK terroism story, but they mention Aruba for some reason.

E terroristanan lo mester tin lazonan fuerte na Trinidad. Esaki ta hopi alarmante mirando cu Trinidad ta algun miya leeuw for di Aruba.

Being language impaired has become a pain in the butt over the past two years.   :?


I think what they are saying is Trinidad is not that far from Aruba maybe?


That makes sense.  I thought maybe it said one of the terrorist planned to go to Aruba and vacation with like minds afterward.  Maybe go to CnC's and grab a beer....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:34:21 AM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I didn't realize that many of us have been doing "thought prints" for the past two years!

The falling down stuff has always stuck out in my mind and to me it indicated some type of trauma Natalee suffered that night/morning.


Hodges also uses examples on his website with 'shark' references...eery coincidence?


What does he say about sharks.  That has always been so crazy and yet it has been around from the beginning.  Wants to go see sharks at 1:30 in the morning after dancing the night away with her classmates.  Only in Aruba would someone come up with that BS.


What is a “Thoughtprint?”
A thoughtprint is unconscious communication hidden within verbal or written communication.

The unconscious mind is communicates constantly and typically hides its messages in verbal or written communication generated by the conscious mind. We don’t always say what we mean. These unconscious communications are what is called Thoughtprints.

To understand thoughtprints and discern what is really being said we must pay attention to the big idea, not necessarily the literal idea. Pay attention to the subject a person introduces. The subject may introduce it through denial: “There are no sharks on the island.” Or by linking it to someone else: “Beverly was talking about seeing the sharks.” The key idea in this case is “sharks.” By paying close attention to the big ideas we get a clear idea what subject matter is on the speakers mind.

Every idea introduced must be taken as an unconscious part of them: They are unconsciously talking about themselves. In the above case the key thoughtprint “sharks” could suggest that the speaker is confessing he is the shark.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/thoughtprint.html


My thought print is that Joran is saying he wanted to feed her to the sharks and in his mind she asked for it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:50:06 AM
Did everyone go back to bed?

So, this afternoon we might get an update on the DeVries report and tonight Dana will delve into "Thought Prints" and something else.  Is that about right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:53:05 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Did everyone go back to bed?

So, this afternoon we might get an update on the DeVries report and tonight Dana will delve into "Thought Prints" and something else.  Is that about right?


Yep - DeVries show should air in about 2 1/2 hours or so.  It's supposed to be a repeat but we are hoping for some updates.

Then we have tonights Dana show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 12:00:54 PM
Easy- I was doing some chores.

This will be an interesting week in my opinion. Next Saturday is the 9th. They will either need to charge the suspects with the other crimes that do not include murder, or lose them.

I think this will be a BIG week.  

And if they don't charge em, how will they build a case that ramps up to murder?
It will be an interesting week....I just hope somewhere along the line... is the Justice for Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on June 03, 2007, 12:15:24 PM
Hey guys!
I spent some time early this morning trying to figure out what we know about the DeVries interview and see here that it will repeat in about 2 hours. Has it already aired (I know the original aired some time ago, but I mean the one with updates since Joran's book).

Klaas? Did you know that there is only one page of your posts available when I pull it up from your profile?  :shock:

Now how am I supposed to look up something when I've only got one page?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 12:17:40 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy- I was doing some chores.

This will be an interesting week in my opinion. Next Saturday is the 9th. They will either need to charge the suspects with the other crimes that do not include murder, or lose them.

I think this will be a BIG week.  

And if they don't charge em, how will they build a case that ramps up to murder?
It will be an interesting week....I just hope somewhere along the line... is the Justice for Natalee.


I hope you are right!  

The Rudy Croes thing might get interesting.  Some of the nutz at FOB were saying Rudy was AVP and a big pal of Jossy Mansur.  Are they that stupid, or just that uninformed? lol  Incredible……

I need to do chores, but I have been watching cooking with cleavage Giada and now I am hungry…… yeah, that too.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 12:17:41 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey guys!
I spent some time early this morning trying to figure out what we know about the DeVries interview and see here that it will repeat in about 2 hours. Has it already aired (I know the original aired some time ago, but I mean the one with updates since Joran's book).

Klaas? Did you know that there is only one page of your posts available when I pull it up from your profile?  :shock:

Now how am I supposed to look up something when I've only got one page?  :lol:


If you use the "search" area to look for my posts there are 876 pages  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 12:20:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey guys!
I spent some time early this morning trying to figure out what we know about the DeVries interview and see here that it will repeat in about 2 hours. Has it already aired (I know the original aired some time ago, but I mean the one with updates since Joran's book).

Klaas? Did you know that there is only one page of your posts available when I pull it up from your profile?  :shock:

Now how am I supposed to look up something when I've only got one page?  :lol:


If you use the "search" area to look for my posts there are 876 pages  :wink:


AH, I see what you mean.  Must be a glitch in the software.  I'll let Tom know about it.  I think if you give a specific word to search though you may find it.  Are you looking for the old DeVries show?  Might be easier to check the front page of SM in November 2006?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 12:22:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey guys!
I spent some time early this morning trying to figure out what we know about the DeVries interview and see here that it will repeat in about 2 hours. Has it already aired (I know the original aired some time ago, but I mean the one with updates since Joran's book).

Klaas? Did you know that there is only one page of your posts available when I pull it up from your profile?  :shock:

Now how am I supposed to look up something when I've only got one page?  :lol:


If you use the "search" area to look for my posts there are 876 pages  :wink:


AH, I see what you mean.  Must be a glitch in the software.  I'll let Tom know about it.  I think if you give a specific word to search though you may find it.  Are you looking for the old DeVries show?  Might be easier to check the front page of SM in November 2006?


Here is the link to the SM front page post regarding the DeVries show.  At the very bottom I believe there is a link to the show.

http://tinyurl.com/ysdgsc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 12:25:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey guys!
I spent some time early this morning trying to figure out what we know about the DeVries interview and see here that it will repeat in about 2 hours. Has it already aired (I know the original aired some time ago, but I mean the one with updates since Joran's book).

Klaas? Did you know that there is only one page of your posts available when I pull it up from your profile?  :shock:

Now how am I supposed to look up something when I've only got one page?  :lol:


If you use the "search" area to look for my posts there are 876 pages  :wink:


AH, I see what you mean.  Must be a glitch in the software.  I'll let Tom know about it.  I think if you give a specific word to search though you may find it.  Are you looking for the old DeVries show?  Might be easier to check the front page of SM in November 2006?


Here is the link to the SM front page post regarding the DeVries show.  At the very bottom I believe there is a link to the show.

http://tinyurl.com/ysdgsc


And here is the thread we had on the DeVries show:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=587


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 12:26:09 PM
I heard Medley was spotted having breakfast at a sidewalk cafe this morning.  Maybe not......


(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/paris_lg.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 12:28:06 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I heard Medley was spotted having breakfast at a sidewalk cafe this morning.  Maybe not......


(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/paris_lg.gif)


Well then there's no wonder she's so envious of how good I look in my topless ballet attire.  :wink:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 03, 2007, 12:28:22 PM
Klass,you have mail.Easy,that was good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 03, 2007, 12:29:15 PM
Bt,please don't go there,we don't want to make others mad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 12:29:50 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Bt,please don't go there,we don't want to make others mad.


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 12:31:36 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I heard Medley was spotted having breakfast at a sidewalk cafe this morning.  Maybe not......


(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/paris_lg.gif)


Well then there's no wonder she's so envious of how good I look in my topless ballet attire.  :wink:  8)


That thong is a brave thong!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 12:34:11 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I heard Medley was spotted having breakfast at a sidewalk cafe this morning.  Maybe not......


(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/paris_lg.gif)


Well then there's no wonder she's so envious of how good I look in my topless ballet attire.  :wink:  8)


That thong is a brave thong!   :shock:


And a strong thong!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 12:37:31 PM
Easy, that picture is a walking appetite suppressant. If I had to look at her in that attire in an outdoor cafe...POOF...just lost my appetite :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 12:40:50 PM
I have a friend who is a good person, but is also a bit strange. She is a physician and also a successful science fiction writer. Many years ago, when we were both much younger, she used to drag me to 3-day science fiction conventions with her. There were a lot of people there who didn't quite fit in with the rest of society. They were mainly overweight, unkempt, socially inept, etc. Some of them were so contrary that they would argue with a sign post and go the wrong way. I used to see the same people at all the different conventions, but I haven't had any contact with  them in years.

I think I know now where to go now to find them if I want to contact them again.  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Nut44x4 on June 03, 2007, 01:10:36 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Easy, that picture is a walking appetite suppressant. If I had to look at her in that attire in an outdoor cafe...POOF...just lost my appetite :wink:



 :smt043  :smt044 Lmaoooooooo!! ITA!! I will now skip lunch...... :smt089

The 'monkey avy post' at RU is just more proof of how demented those people really are....makes me ill.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 01:14:26 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy- I was doing some chores.

This will be an interesting week in my opinion. Next Saturday is the 9th. They will either need to charge the suspects with the other crimes that do not include murder, or lose them.

I think this will be a BIG week.  

And if they don't charge em, how will they build a case that ramps up to murder?
It will be an interesting week....I just hope somewhere along the line... is the Justice for Natalee.  


I think so too Rob.  That's the way I've understood it too although we've been told that we don't understand their system.  ppffttt.  Justice is coming.

BTW good to see everyone.  Had an amazing trip, but the internet on the ship really stunk.  I had wireless, but it was still so slow it took me 4 minutes just to check 1 email each day from the office.  And at 30 cents a minute I was only able to check in at SM several times.

I did read one evening where Grande had posted a spreadsheet of some sort but was never able to find it.  Could somebody show me the way? TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: greeneyedlady on June 03, 2007, 01:14:29 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I heard Medley was spotted having breakfast at a sidewalk cafe this morning.  Maybe not......


(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/paris_lg.gif)


Well then there's no wonder she's so envious of how good I look in my topless ballet attire.  :wink:  8)


That thong is a brave thong!   :shock:


And a strong thong!  :wink:


Too funny!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 01:16:42 PM
Pearl at BFN posted this article from May
I found it quite interesting, IMO could give possibility to the holloway
family down the road

http://www.intelligencer.ca/webapp/sitepages/content.asp?contentid=522622&catname=Local+News&classif=


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 01:19:25 PM
{{{Hey Snoopy}}}

Welcome back! I don't know where the spreadsheet Grande posted is, but I'd love to see it as well....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 01:19:45 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy- I was doing some chores.

This will be an interesting week in my opinion. Next Saturday is the 9th. They will either need to charge the suspects with the other crimes that do not include murder, or lose them.

I think this will be a BIG week.  

And if they don't charge em, how will they build a case that ramps up to murder?
It will be an interesting week....I just hope somewhere along the line... is the Justice for Natalee.  


I think so too Rob.  That's the way I've understood it too although we've been told that we don't understand their system.  ppffttt.  Justice is coming.

BTW good to see everyone.  Had an amazing trip, but the internet on the ship really stunk.  I had wireless, but it was still so slow it took me 4 minutes just to check 1 email each day from the office.  And at 30 cents a minute I was only able to check in at SM several times.

I did read one evening where Grande had posted a spreadsheet of some sort but was never able to find it.  Could somebody show me the way? TIA


Here you go Snoopy:

SEARCHABLE LIST OF THE STATEMENTS REQUESTED IN THE DR. PHIL MOTION TO COMPEL (in excel format) - This was put together by GRANDE

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/nhcase-statements.xls


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 01:24:43 PM
Thanks San! I hear you've been feeling poorly...I hope you're doing better now!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 01:29:01 PM
Thats's a good article  Sue.  

Good to see you too Mishy

San thank you, and glad you're feeling better.

Easy...why people wanna flash thier unders will always amaze me.  Nasty.  wow.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 01:31:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy- I was doing some chores.

This will be an interesting week in my opinion. Next Saturday is the 9th. They will either need to charge the suspects with the other crimes that do not include murder, or lose them.

I think this will be a BIG week.  

And if they don't charge em, how will they build a case that ramps up to murder?
It will be an interesting week....I just hope somewhere along the line... is the Justice for Natalee.  


I think so too Rob.  That's the way I've understood it too although we've been told that we don't understand their system.  ppffttt.  Justice is coming.

BTW good to see everyone.  Had an amazing trip, but the internet on the ship really stunk.  I had wireless, but it was still so slow it took me 4 minutes just to check 1 email each day from the office.  And at 30 cents a minute I was only able to check in at SM several times.

I did read one evening where Grande had posted a spreadsheet of some sort but was never able to find it.  Could somebody show me the way? TIA


Here you go Snoopy:

SEARCHABLE LIST OF THE STATEMENTS REQUESTED IN THE DR. PHIL MOTION TO COMPEL (in excel format) - This was put together by GRANDE

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/nhcase-statements.xls


I sent Klaas an updated version with some interesting details, if anyone wants it just email me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 01:34:18 PM
That's an awesome job Grande.  Lot of hard work.  Much appreciated.  I would like to see the updated version, but I don't have your email.  I'll ask Klaasend to send it to me when she has time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 01:37:00 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Rob"
Easy- I was doing some chores.

This will be an interesting week in my opinion. Next Saturday is the 9th. They will either need to charge the suspects with the other crimes that do not include murder, or lose them.

I think this will be a BIG week.  

And if they don't charge em, how will they build a case that ramps up to murder?
It will be an interesting week....I just hope somewhere along the line... is the Justice for Natalee.  


I think so too Rob.  That's the way I've understood it too although we've been told that we don't understand their system.  ppffttt.  Justice is coming.

BTW good to see everyone.  Had an amazing trip, but the internet on the ship really stunk.  I had wireless, but it was still so slow it took me 4 minutes just to check 1 email each day from the office.  And at 30 cents a minute I was only able to check in at SM several times.

I did read one evening where Grande had posted a spreadsheet of some sort but was never able to find it.  Could somebody show me the way? TIA


Here you go Snoopy:

SEARCHABLE LIST OF THE STATEMENTS REQUESTED IN THE DR. PHIL MOTION TO COMPEL (in excel format) - This was put together by GRANDE

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/nhcase-statements.xls


I sent Klaas an updated version with some interesting details, if anyone wants it just email me.


Grande - yes, I did get that.  Haven't had a chance to ask Tom to replace it yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 01:38:48 PM
Klaas you have mail  8)

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 01:39:17 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Klaas you have mail  8)

TIA


Back at ya, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 01:40:41 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
That's an awesome job Grande.  Lot of hard work.  Much appreciated.  I would like to see the updated version, but I don't have your email.  I'll ask Klaasend to send it to me when she has time.


Snoop... My pleasure as always!  Email addy is tdbweb2003@yahoo.com if necessary.  Email anytime.  

Klaas, no problem whatsoever.  Just wanted you to have it for what it's worth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZLady on June 03, 2007, 01:55:54 PM
Morning Monkeys.  It's a lazy Sunday morning here in AZ.  I looked at the RU garbage today.  Don't they know that this case is still open?  No one will discuss the reward until the case is resolved.  Then, anyone who has a claim may file for the money.  Until the case is resolved, there is no point in even discussing rewards.  And, yes, the offer of a reward is a binding legal contract that is enforceable in a court of law.  However--and this is a big one--the CASE HAS TO BE SOLVED FIRST before anyone will entertain claims for the reward money.  Geez, talk about putting the cart before the horse...   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 01:56:04 PM
Thanks Klaas.  I haven't recieved it yet, but it'll come shortly.

Thanks Grande.

Ya'll won't believe this.  Daughter was in charge of picture taking while we were on our trip.  I just now had a chance to look at them, and man she is one lousy picture taker!!  Dang.   :roll:  :shock:  :lol:

No soup for her.........next.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZLady on June 03, 2007, 01:58:05 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Thanks Klaas.  I haven't recieved it yet, but it'll come shortly.

Thanks Grande.

Ya'll won't believe this.  Daughter was in charge of picture taking while we were on our trip.  I just now had a chance to look at them, and man she is one lousy picture taker!!  Dang.   :roll:  :shock:  :lol:

No soup for her.........next.......


Snoopy where did you go?  I know about bad picture takers as I am one!  It seems some people just naturally know how to frame and focus a shot, but some people (like me!) are really clueless and literally just point and click the darn camera!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 01:58:41 PM
Hi AZLady.  It's a lazy day here in St. Louis too cause I'm making it one


Rock On!!  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 02:04:08 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi AZLady.  It's a lazy day here in St. Louis too cause I'm making it one


Rock On!!  8)


Hi Snoopy!  :smt006

I'm glad you had a good time. Did you see our friend who still hasn't written back to me?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZLady on June 03, 2007, 02:10:52 PM
For everyone at RU and elsewhere who are interested in the legal ramifications of reward monies, here is an article from the Thompson Gale Law Encyclopedia titled Reward, from http://www.answers.com/topic/reward

This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

Reward
A sum of money or other compensation offered to the public in general, or to a class of persons, for the performance of a special service.

It is commonplace for the police to offer a reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of an offender, or for a pet owner to post notices in a neighborhood offering a reward for the return of a lost dog or cat. In legal terms, the person promising a reward is offering to enter into a contract with the person who performs the requested action, that is, turning in a criminal or returning a lost pet. Performance will be rewarded with money or some other compensation. Therefore, the legal concepts involving rewards are derived from the law of contracts.

An actual, valid offer must be made to create a contract of reward. The offer is merely a proposal or a conditional promise by the person offering the reward, known legally as the offerer. It is not a consummated contract until the requested action is performed.

The person offering the reward can do so on any terms she wishes, and the terms must be met before the reward can be recovered. The subject matter of the offer can entail the discovery of information leading to the arrest and conviction of a person, the discovery of stolen property and the apprehension of the thief, the return of lost property, or the recovery or rescue of a person.

A prize or premium can be a valid offer of a reward for exhibits, architectural plans, paintings, the best performance in a tournament, the suggestion of a name, or the achievement of the best time in a race.

Any person, including corporations, legally capable of making a contract can bind herself by an offer of reward. Legislatures have the power to offer rewards for acts that will be of public benefit. Legislatures, however, typically empower officers, such as the governor, the U.S. attorney general, or a federal marshal, to offer rewards for certain purposes, such as the apprehension of criminals.

Unless a statute requires the offer to be in writing, the offer of reward can be made orally. An offer can be made by a private contract with a particular person or by an advertisement or public statement on television or radio, or in a newspaper, handbill, or circular.

A contract of reward, like any contract, must be supported by consideration, something of value. The consideration that supports the promise of reward is the trouble or inconvenience resulting to the person who has acted on the faith of the promise.

Because an unaccepted offer of reward grants no contractual rights, the offer can be revoked or canceled at any time prior to its acceptance by performance. Once a person has performed or partially performed the requested action, an offer of reward cannot be revoked to deprive a person of compensation. An offer must be revoked either in the way in which it was made or in a manner that gives the revocation the same publicity as the offer. A later offer, in different terms from the first, does not revoke the first offer.

Generally an offer of reward that has no time limit is considered to have been withdrawn after a reasonable time. What constitutes a reasonable period of time depends largely on the circumstances under which the offer was made. In some jurisdictions a reward for the discovery of criminal offenders only lapses when the statute of limitations has expired against the crime.

A reward can be claimed only by a person who has complied with the conditions of the offer before it expires or is revoked. Performance can be completed by a third person, such as an agent or servant, who is acting on behalf of the claimant's interest.

When the reward is offered for information leading to an arrest and conviction, the return of property, the location of a missing person, or for other purposes, the person who furnishes the information is entitled to the reward. This rule applies even if, in the case of arrest, the person does nothing more than disclose the information and others make the physical capture. The informant need not become involved in the prosecution or appear as a witness at the offender's trial to collect the reward.

The information must be adequate and timely for a person to collect a reward. If a criminal has surrendered or the information was already known when the informant provided it, no reward will be given. Likewise, if the information does not lead to the desired end included in the initial offer, such as an arrest and conviction, or the recovery of property, the reward will be denied. However, when the reward is for the detection or discovery of an offender, a conviction is not necessary as long as the discovery or arrest occurs.

When a reward is offered for the apprehension or arrest of a criminal, a personal arrest by the claimant is usually not necessary. The arrest of the wanted person must be lawful, no matter who makes it. Those making an unlawful arrest cannot recover the reward because an agreement for an unlawful arrest is against public policy and unenforceable. If the offender voluntarily surrenders or is en route to surrender, the captors have not earned the reward.

Generally when a reward is offered for the arrest and conviction of an offender, the person claiming the reward must have caused both the arrest and subsequent conviction because both are conditions of recovery under the contract. The reward in such a case cannot be apportioned between what is due for the arrest and what is due for the conviction.

When lost property is involved, some states have statutes that provide for a reward for the finder or for compensation for the expense of recovering and preserving the property. If only a proportionate share is returned, the finder is entitled to a proportionate part of the reward. When such a statute does not exist, however, a finder has no right to a reward for the return of property to its owner if none has been offered.

If the offered reward is definite and certain, the finder has a lien on the property in the amount of the reward until it is paid. A lien is a charge against property to secure the payment of a debt or the performance of an obligation. For example, if John offers a reward of $100 for the return of his missing motorcycle and Bob goes looking and finds it, Bob can file a lien for $100 against the motorcycle with the local court if John does not pay him the reward. If the offer is indefinite, such as one that states "liberal reward" for the return of the motorcycle, there is no lien on the property.

Except in the case of statutory rewards, the general rule is that the person who claims the reward must have performed the services knowing of the offer and for the purpose of collecting the reward. For example, if Bob happens to find John's motorcycle in a ditch and returns it to John not knowing that he had offered a $100 reward, Bob cannot claim the $100. This rule is based on the theory that without such knowledge there can be no meeting of the minds, which is essential to the formation of a contract. Knowledge of a statutory remedy is not necessary to entitle the claimant to recover it.

When a reward is offered to the public, anyone who performs the required service can claim and accept the reward, except persons who are under a duty to perform such services. A law enforcement officer, therefore, cannot claim a reward if the service performed is within the line and scope of the officer's duty. This prohibition will apply even if the officer performed the service at a time when he was not on duty or was outside his territorial jurisdiction. When, however, an officer acts beyond the scope and line of duty, there is no prohibition in claiming the reward.

A person who aids and abets the commission of a crime has no right to a reward for the arrest of the perpetrator. Similarly a person who purchases stolen property with reasonable grounds for believing it has been stolen cannot receive a reward offered for its return.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 02:11:19 PM
AZLady, I agree with you but with RU and FOB it does appear having the SM whipping post is key to their survival. what would they do with themselves all day if they could not hurl at others and at this family? It's telling isn't it?

Actually with SMS and now Roger involved in medley's defend the reward credibility site, one has to wonder if all of this is an effort to discourage those who might come forward in Aruba or elsewhere? They will go to any lengths to protect Deepak and Satish, and Meds appears to want to be Joran's surrogate mother so my take is it's their effort to deflect belief in the reward for that simple reason.

Jossy's plan for full page ads might be more than they can bear, huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:11:30 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Thanks Klaas.  I haven't recieved it yet, but it'll come shortly.

Thanks Grande.

Ya'll won't believe this.  Daughter was in charge of picture taking while we were on our trip.  I just now had a chance to look at them, and man she is one lousy picture taker!!  Dang.   :roll:  :shock:  :lol:

No soup for her.........next.......


Snoopy where did you go?  I know about bad picture takers as I am one!  It seems some people just naturally know how to frame and focus a shot, but some people (like me!) are really clueless and literally just point and click the darn camera!   :lol:


Western Carribean on the Maiden voyage of The Liberty Of The Seas.

Awesome ship.  Amazing.

Went to Labadee, Haiti.  That's Royal Carribeans private area.  Didn't wander away as there is a travel advisory to Haiti.  Big iron fence around the area.  Was very beautiful otherwise.

Monteego Bay, Jamaica.  Stepped off the ship and right back on so we could say we was there.  One very nasty place from what I could see.

Georgetown,Grand Caymen  very beautiful.  Went jet boating and snorkeling.  Never done that before.  Awesome.

Cozumel, Mexico  very beautiful too.  Dune Buggy / snorkel excursion.  Great time.  A lot of reconstruction going on since hurricane Wilma.

Back to Miami, and the Orlando where we stayed with my nephew until Wednesday monring.  Went to Sea World, Kennedy space center, and Cocoa Beach.

But.................there's no place like home

Heard this morning that 200 passengers were quarantined last week with norvo virus.  Glad we weren't on that trip.  Geez all people have to do is wash their hands.  There are hand sanitizers everywhere.  Just no need for anyone to get sick if they'l just follow the rules.

P.S.  Liked the Eastern Carribean much better.

Next vacation we're gonna stay in America.   I hear the Alabama / Mississippi / Louisiana coastline is gorgeous. 8)   Need to keep the money here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 03, 2007, 02:13:01 PM
AZLady thank you for the specific legal details, I suspect RU relies upon Charlierat who appears to practice more law on forums than in real life. A shame, such a waste of a rat attorney  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:13:07 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Hi AZLady.  It's a lazy day here in St. Louis too cause I'm making it one


Rock On!!  8)


Hi Snoopy!  :smt006

I'm glad you had a good time. Did you see our friend who still hasn't written back to me?


Hi ya BT!!!!

I never heard back from her.  I think she ditched me. lol   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZLady on June 03, 2007, 02:15:43 PM
None, it is beyond my comprehension why people who want information just don't do a simple google search.  Information is readily available to those who seek it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 02:16:53 PM
I was thinking last night and had a trip down fantasy land.
What if he did just leave her at the beach ?
Where is she now ?
Why when he was arrested did he not do anything to further his claim of innocence except talk ? If she was left at the beach and the place where she was left was shown to the ALE, there might have been some evidence or clues as to her whereabouts ?
Why did so many people in Aruba come on to the blogs and start rumors and lies ? The one I am thinking about is the ran away before in Costa Rica and the FBI was involved. All of that was in the early days, well before the boycott. Why was and is there so much sh*t talking about the family of a missing girl ?
He wants to clear his name but wants to do it by finding fault with everyone but himself. Beth and Jug were from my understanding aggressive the first evening // Is there any other way to behave ? If they had said pretty please with sugar on it, would the outcome not have been the same ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZLady on June 03, 2007, 02:19:58 PM
Snoopy, I saw that ship on a Travel channel show.  It looks awesome.  Just huge, huh?  Eastern Caribbean is much more safe and friendly than western.  We were in Cozumel last Christmas.  I love Mexico and go there often.  It sounds like you had a wonderful trip.  Yes, the hand sanitizer is everywhere, isn't it?  We used it often on the last cruise.  I agree that you won't get sick if you don't eat off the buffets where food is sitting out and use the sanitizer and wash often.  We cruised on the Grand Princess last December, large but not as large and elaborate as the Liberty of the Seas.  We're trying a smaller and more intimate ship next Christmas that only holds about 600 guests--it will be a nice contrast.  Glad you had fun!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: AZLady on June 03, 2007, 02:28:50 PM
I'll be back later, Monkey friends.  I'm waiting to hear what de Vries has to say on his show today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on June 03, 2007, 02:36:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey guys!
I spent some time early this morning trying to figure out what we know about the DeVries interview and see here that it will repeat in about 2 hours. Has it already aired (I know the original aired some time ago, but I mean the one with updates since Joran's book).

Klaas? Did you know that there is only one page of your posts available when I pull it up from your profile?  :shock:

Now how am I supposed to look up something when I've only got one page?  :lol:


If you use the "search" area to look for my posts there are 876 pages  :wink:


AH, I see what you mean.  Must be a glitch in the software.  I'll let Tom know about it.  I think if you give a specific word to search though you may find it.  Are you looking for the old DeVries show?  Might be easier to check the front page of SM in November 2006?


Here is the link to the SM front page post regarding the DeVries show.  At the very bottom I believe there is a link to the show.

http://tinyurl.com/ysdgsc


Thanks Klaas! I got called away, but am checking it out now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 02:38:15 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
AZLady thank you for the specific legal details, I suspect RU relies upon Charlierat who appears to practice more law on forums than in real life. A shame, such a waste of a rat attorney  :lol:


I guess ya get what you pay for...

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/redneck_smoke.jpg)

This is a fictious character and any resemblance to any practicing ambulance chaser is purely coincidental.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 03, 2007, 02:40:17 PM
Hey Monkeys!  Just popped in for a minute to see if anything was happening.  #3 daughter's roommate brought her home from college today.  Fever 102 and feeling really bad.  We are about to go see a doctor.  Will check in when we get back!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:40:54 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Snoopy, I saw that ship on a Travel channel show.  It looks awesome.  Just huge, huh?  Eastern Caribbean is much more safe and friendly than western.  We were in Cozumel last Christmas.  I love Mexico and go there often.  It sounds like you had a wonderful trip.  Yes, the hand sanitizer is everywhere, isn't it?  We used it often on the last cruise.  I agree that you won't get sick if you don't eat off the buffets where food is sitting out and use the sanitizer and wash often.  We cruised on the Grand Princess last December, large but not as large and elaborate as the Liberty of the Seas.  We're trying a smaller and more intimate ship next Christmas that only holds about 600 guests--it will be a nice contrast.  Glad you had fun!!  :lol:


The key to being on a large ship is the location of your cabin.  My nephew is a travel agent sotospeak, and they have been on many cruises.  They set us up in cabin #6668 on deck 6.  It's toward the rear of the ship.  (don't remember the proper word for back of the ship lol) Aft maybe?  right below our cabin on deck 5 was the prominade which is amazing in and of itself.  Deck 4 was our dining area.   Then straight up to deck 11 12 and 13 where  all the action is.

Sumbody told me that the casino had pretty looses slots too!!  8)

Only complaint was the coffee was too strong, and the internet too slow.  They use Seatle's Best coffee, and it was just to strong for me.

We did get a little 3 on 3 basketball game going with some of the kids on the ship.  They didn't get the memo that my son is an amazing basketball player, and that I taught him everything he knows. lol  Daughters hubby to be is pretty good too.  Think the other boys were a little dejected that an old lady beat them.  3 pointers rule!  :roll:  8)  :lol:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 02:41:12 PM
I just went over to FOB and they have posted an email addy for the FBI
to ask about the reward, etc. I am sure he will be glad to hear from them.
..
Why does anyone over there think they should be paid ? For what ? Any information they provided ?? Did they ever provide any useful information that would lead to the solution of the case ? Or was it to crap up the case thus providing assistance to the suspects and criminals ? Isn't that illegal ?
..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 02:41:36 PM
Has anyone else seen The Dead Girl?  What a dark, powerful movie that I wish I didn't watch.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:44:08 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
I'll be back later, Monkey friends.  I'm waiting to hear what de Vries has to say on his show today.


Have a good day AZLady


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:45:16 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Hey Monkeys!  Just popped in for a minute to see if anything was happening.  #3 daughter's roommate brought her home from college today.  Fever 102 and feeling really bad.  We are about to go see a doctor.  Will check in when we get back!!


Hope she gets to feeling better real soon casa.  Keep us updated.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on June 03, 2007, 02:45:39 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Has anyone else seen The Dead Girl?  What a dark, powerful movie that I wish I didn't watch.   :shock:


I've never heard of it. Who's in the cast?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:46:12 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I just went over to FOB and they have posted an email addy for the FBI
to ask about the reward, etc. I am sure he will be glad to hear from them.
..
Why does anyone over there think they should be paid ? For what ? Any information they provided ?? Did they ever provide any useful information that would lead to the solution of the case ? Or was it to crap up the case thus providing assistance to the suspects and criminals ? Isn't that illegal ?
..


As mrs. red says.........stuck........on.......stupid


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 02:48:09 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
AZLady thank you for the specific legal details, I suspect RU relies upon Charlierat who appears to practice more law on forums than in real life. A shame, such a waste of a rat attorney  :lol:


I guess ya get what you pay for...

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h122/EasyWriter/redneck_smoke.jpg)

This is a fictious character and any resemblance to any practicing ambulance chaser is purely coincidental.


Easy, this is a classic!!!!!!!!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 02:49:08 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Has anyone else seen The Dead Girl?  What a dark, powerful movie that I wish I didn't watch.   :shock:


Geez Easy....just the name of the movie alone would make me not want to watch it.  I did watch Hanibal Rising the other night, and while pretty gorey, it was a good movie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 02:49:43 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Has anyone else seen The Dead Girl?  What a dark, powerful movie that I wish I didn't watch.   :shock:


I've never heard of it. Who's in the cast?


Toni Collette, Mary Beth Hurt, Marcia Gay Harden, Kerry Washington, Brittany Murphy, Piper Laurie, Rose Byrne, James Franco, Giovanni Ribisi, Mary Steenburgen, and Bruce Davison


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 02:50:45 PM
I haven't seen that one Easy. What channel was it on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on June 03, 2007, 02:52:30 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I just went over to FOB and they have posted an email addy for the FBI
to ask about the reward, etc. I am sure he will be glad to hear from them.
..
Why does anyone over there think they should be paid ? For what ? Any information they provided ?? Did they ever provide any useful information that would lead to the solution of the case ? Or was it to crap up the case thus providing assistance to the suspects and criminals ? Isn't that illegal ?
..


As mrs. red says.........stuck........on.......stupid


Please don't be offended anyone..........it's not meant to be a political statement, but everytime I hear the phrase "Stuck On Stupid" I visualiaze this picture:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Stuck20On20Stupid-775982.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 02:52:37 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Has anyone else seen The Dead Girl?  What a dark, powerful movie that I wish I didn't watch.   :shock:


Geez Easy....just the name of the movie alone would make me not want to watch it.  I did watch Hanibal Rising the other night, and while pretty gorey, it was a good movie.


Well, I was reading about it and there was a lot of critical praise and I think it won some awards.  So, I thought I would check it out.  It was riveting, but.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 02:55:27 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
I haven't seen that one Easy. What channel was it on?


It was on a dvd.  I like to buy collector edition movies, classics and old favorites.  I will throw in a couple of new ones, if I read good things about them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 02:58:08 PM
Well Cindy has gone back to her private life. I used to like Jesse.
I took that quiz. I was a 6. Maybe they didn't ask the right questions or maybe it is 'casue I am a Canadian and some of the questions are n /a to me in reality.  
Easy, that is really CR ? Looks like a bypass waiting to happen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 03:00:20 PM
And he could wear a shirt !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on June 03, 2007, 03:03:24 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Well Cindy has gone back to her private life. I used to like Jesse.
I took that quiz. I was a 6. Maybe they didn't ask the right questions or maybe it is 'casue I am a Canadian and some of the questions are n /a to me in reality.  
Easy, that is really CR ? Looks like a bypass waiting to happen.


I was a 21, so that probably accounts a little for why I conjure that picture up in my mind's eye!  :lol:

Honestly, I think it has mostly to do with the facial expressions. I didn't know you were Canadian! I've always wanted to visit Canada. Well, howdy neighbor!  :wink:
You wear your hat well, Kat and I'm glad you felt free to put it on!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 03, 2007, 03:06:09 PM
Kat,What NHL team has the most French Canadians?Who was that creature


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 03:06:12 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Well Cindy has gone back to her private life. I used to like Jesse.
I took that quiz. I was a 6. Maybe they didn't ask the right questions or maybe it is 'casue I am a Canadian and some of the questions are n /a to me in reality.  
Easy, that is really CR ? Looks like a bypass waiting to happen.


No, I was making a joke.  There are some real pictures of rat floating around though.  He actually looks a little more like the Pillsbury Doughboy with glasses.  I believe he works with a small legal firm as an associate and they specialize in bancruptcy and social secuity disability claims.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 03:08:04 PM
Are we getting any closer to the DeVries program?  Has the Dutch FP poster been around yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 03:09:06 PM
O/T Well this is a first !
The pharmicist just called asking how was I ? How am I doing on the medication ?  Any side effects ? Is the lung infection getting better ? Last night I had a fever again. ???
I think I need to look up what I am taking if they are worried about it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:10:36 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Are we getting any closer to the DeVries program?  Has the Dutch FP poster been around yet?

The show is 1/2 over.  Ramm has posted at BFN that nothing new yet except that according to the show, Paul was not at the blackjack table because he left early.  I did ask Ramm if DeVries listed a source for that information other than ALE or Joran but to answer from Ramm yet.  Robert, the front page poster hasn't posted yet.

They were discussing the show a bit at RU, but RU appears to be down right now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 03:11:12 PM
RaMM POSTED SO FAR AT bfn

first part did not bring any new information to light.

Only new things is that according to the show there was only Joran in the casino, Paul had left earlier and was not at the black Jack table.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:11:42 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
O/T Well this is a first !
The pharmicist just called asking how was I ? How am I doing on the medication ?  Any side effects ? Is the lung infection getting better ? Last night I had a fever again. ???
I think I need to look up what I am taking if they are worried about it.

What medication did they give you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 03:15:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Are we getting any closer to the DeVries program?  Has the Dutch FP poster been around yet?

The show is 1/2 over.  Ramm has posted at BFN that nothing new yet except that according to the show, Paul was not at the blackjack table because he left early.  I did ask Ramm if DeVries listed a source for that information other than ALE or Joran but to answer from Ramm yet.  Robert, the front page poster hasn't posted yet.

They were discussing the show a bit at RU, but RU appears to be down right now.


Well, maybe he will close it with something about being called a crook.  It being Sunday and all maybe RU was struck by lightening!   :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 03:15:29 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Kat,What NHL team has the most French Canadians?Who was that creature

?? Montreal Canadiens ?
I lost interest in hockey ages ago Tiger...
..
I guess I better keep quiet...
they might come and take my citizenship away.. or find out and come looking to take me away to the place where they indoctrinate / innoculate / vaccinate for these things here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 03:20:59 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
O/T Well this is a first !
The pharmicist just called asking how was I ? How am I doing on the medication ?  Any side effects ? Is the lung infection getting better ? Last night I had a fever again. ???
I think I need to look up what I am taking if they are worried about it.

What medication did they give you?

Biaxin XL    there was a sheet of paper with it, read it, tossed it.
Other than I am still ill ( but not as bad ) it's ok.
The doctor said that it would be a while and this might not finish it off, but to do a follow up with a chest x-ray to see what if anything to do next..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:22:27 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
O/T Well this is a first !
The pharmicist just called asking how was I ? How am I doing on the medication ?  Any side effects ? Is the lung infection getting better ? Last night I had a fever again. ???
I think I need to look up what I am taking if they are worried about it.

What medication did they give you?

Biaxin XL    there was a sheet of paper with it, read it, tossed it.
Other than I am still ill ( but not as bad ) it's ok.
The doctor said that it would be a while and this might not finish it off, but to do a follow up with a chest x-ray to see what if anything to do next..


http://www.drugs.com/biaxin.html

http://biaxinxl.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:24:18 PM
Per Ramm at BFN:

second part focused among others on:

1. the shoe story

2. the fact that the police believe that Natalee was never at the beach but rather at Joran's apartment, that she had consensual sex with him and might have died due to her taking too much drugs and alcohol, making it an accidental death.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:29:19 PM
Aruban minister Croes breaks off with the Netherlands  

ORANJESTAD – The Aruban Justice-minister Rudy Croes (MEP breaks off all ties with the Netherlands and will no longer collaborate with this country in the future.  He said that in Colombia , where he is currently.  

The Amigoe already reported last Friday that Aruba will start with not attending the next tripartite between the Justice-ministers of the Netherlands , the Neth.Antilles, and Aruba .  “The Netherlands is playing games with us”, said Croes.  With his statement he joins the position of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber, who indicated earlier this week that due to the attitude of the Netherlands , he has not been in this country for year-and-a-half already.  

Rudy Croes took his statements in Colombia even a little further.  According to ANP, he even prohibits all contacts between people for his department and the Netherlands .  Aruba has already been talking about the (further) judicial collaboration when the new political division of the Kingdom takes place on December 15th, 2008.  

Croes’ statements surprised the Antillean Prime Minister Emily de Jongh-Elhage ( PAR ), who paid Aruba an official visit in the past days.  Also the Antillean Justice-minister David Dick ( PAR ) says that he had not talked to Croes yet.  He wonders what motivated Croes to take this decision.  

Two matters are playing part in the dispute between Aruba and the Netherlands : the Aruban loan of 50 million dollars for which the Kingdom (read: the Netherlands ) is making reservations; and the other matter is the proceeds on the buildings in which the Aruba Marriott Resort & Stellaris Casino are established.

http://www.amigoe.com/english/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 03:29:29 PM
Well whatever about the Devries, but how can they make these assumptions about the 2.) when everyone involved lied and did not get the girl help, if that was the case .
My " thoughtprints" tell me she was injured during the commission of a crime, else why Deepak and Satish ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:29:59 PM
Water and electricity increase with 12 percent  

ORANJESTAD – Consumers of water and electricity will notice an increase of more or less 12 percent on this month’s utility bill.  Water- and Electricity Company WEB increased the tariffs again in June.  This is due to the increased oil price on the world market.  

The company emphasizes that the price for water consumption won’t increase for 40 percent of the households, because this group does not consume more than 12 cube of water per month.  The tariffs remain the same for this quantity.  The WEB bases the tariff for 12 cube water on a fixed fuel price of 35 dollars per oil barrel for the production of water.  The tariff for more than 12 cube of water and for electricity is based on 51 dollars that WEB pays for one barrel oil.  That is about 23 percent more than what the company had paid for one barrel in May.

http://www.amigoe.com/english/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 03:30:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Per Ramm at BFN:

second part focused among others on:

1. the shoe story

2. the fact that the police believe that Natalee was never at the beach but rather at Joran's apartment, that she had consensual sex with him and might have died due to her taking too much drugs and alcohol, making it an accidental death.


I think this is what Joran confessed to on June 10th.  I think he and Deepak admitted to consenual sex (because Steve Cohen said two of them did when he spoke in Peurto Rico and because initially, only Deepak and Joran had attornies..not Satish). IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 03:31:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
2. the fact that the police believe that Natalee was never at the beach but rather at Joran's apartment, that she had consensual sex with him and might have died due to her taking too much drugs and alcohol, making it an accidental death.

And the body is missing because...?

Hope DeVries is talking about ALE and not KLPD.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:36:05 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
2. the fact that the police believe that Natalee was never at the beach but rather at Joran's apartment, that she had consensual sex with him and might have died due to her taking too much drugs and alcohol, making it an accidental death.

And the body is missing because...?

Hope DeVries is talking about ALE and not KLPD.

I don't think he did.  I asked Ramm if anything new was said and haven't heard back from him yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 03:36:10 PM
So, Natalee was completely coherent, went to Joran’s place, had consensual sex and then dropped dead due to an overdose of alcohol and drugs.  Just how does that add up?

What do any of these people know that we don’t?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:37:40 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
So, Natalee was completely coherent, went to Joran’s place, had consensual sex and then dropped dead due to an overdose of alcohol and drugs.  Just how does that add up?

What do any of these people know that we don’t?

This same information was relayed in the first broadcast.  I don't think DeVries believes it, he's only relaying what ALE's view was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 03:39:21 PM
Need to run out for a while, be back in about an hour or so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 03:42:50 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
What do any of these people know that we don’t?

What ALE does know, or thinks, is that an accidental death makes them look better than a botched murder case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 03, 2007, 03:49:28 PM
Kat,the Ducks,do.It was a suprise to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 03:50:24 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
What do any of these people know that we don’t?

What ALE does know, or thinks, is that an accidental death makes them look better than a botched murder case.


Funny how Medley hated Devries and called him a lying pos that robbed Joran's apartment after his first report and now she says that what he says is proof positive that Paulus was not at the blackjack table.

What a dingbat!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 04:01:15 PM
Medley!  If Sam R and Sandra K want a reward, maybe they should check with the Van Der Sloots and see what they are paying for misinformation these days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 04:15:53 PM
Quote from: "Tiger"
Kat,the Ducks,do.It was a suprise to me.

Really !
I worked with hockey nuts and hockey mumma nuts. Man  worked closely with was a coach for Team Canada and still coaches.
Used to go to hockey games when the ' boys ' we knew were playing.
It was also a social thing. Many hockey parties. Only time my interest was peaked recently was when the Junior games were on. That is good hockey.
Now because of GD and her gymastics and soccer, interests lie elsewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 04:17:46 PM
Per Rubina on BFN

Well, just watched the whole show on sbs6...it was more than a year ago i visited this forum. At that time i was to confused to have an opinion on this case.

To me it's pretty obvious now that all the answers for the dissapearing of Natalee lies within Joran and his family.

Greetz from the Netherlands
Rubina


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 04:21:14 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Medley!  If Sam R and Sandra K want a reward, maybe they should check with the Van Der Sloots and see what they are paying for misinformation these days.

Waht a LOAD. I had to say that because Robots isn't here.
I have been spending way too much time over there past week. Makes me ill that ppl like that are using up resources of my planet like air to breathe. I feel like a not better person for even reading that type of slime and getting pissed off because of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 04:26:33 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Per Rubina on BFN

Well, just watched the whole show on sbs6...it was more than a year ago i visited this forum. At that time i was to confused to have an opinion on this case.

To me it's pretty obvious now that all the answers for the dissapearing of Natalee lies within Joran and his family.

Greetz from the Netherlands
Rubina


Did he comment on the book or anything new?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 04:27:57 PM
Per Ramm on BFN

In reality this was just a repeat of his show from half a year ago with about a minute or 2 at the end where he spoke about Joran's book and his lying personality, he commented on Joran admitting he was behind the pictures and that all this lying makes him very suspicious.

That was about it with regard to the show, nothing much in the way of new information i am sorry to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Buckeye on June 03, 2007, 04:31:12 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Per Ramm on BFN

In reality this was just a repeat of his show from half a year ago with about a minute or 2 at the end where he spoke about Joran's book and his lying personality, he commented on Joran admitting he was behind the pictures and that all this lying makes him very suspicious.

That was about it with regard to the show, nothing much in the way of new information i am sorry to say.


Thanks


Title: Hello Monkies! New to forum
Post by: Destiny on June 03, 2007, 04:37:25 PM
I've just joined, but have been reading here for a long time.

Decided to stick my toe in the water and see how it feels ;-)

Came here from a link at BFN....you have a very nice bunch here in the cage.

CBB...I think, I have an avitar I'd like to use, but alas don't have that particular savy. If I email it to someone...hint...hint....pretty please may I get some help?

Oh....BTW, Joran's book will be his unwinding....POS that he is, he can't stop the diarrhea of the mouth.

Destiny.....


Title: Re: Hello Monkies! New to forum
Post by: snoopy on June 03, 2007, 04:42:24 PM
Quote from: "Destiny"
I've just joined, but have been reading here for a long time.

Decided to stick my toe in the water and see how it feels ;-)

Came here from a link at BFN....you have a very nice bunch here in the cage.

CBB...I think, I have an avitar I'd like to use, but alas don't have that particular savy. If I email it to someone...hint...hint....pretty please may I get some help?

Oh....BTW, Joran's book will be his unwinding....POS that he is, he can't stop the diarrhea of the mouth.

Destiny.....


Nice to "meet" you Destiny.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Destiny on June 03, 2007, 04:46:52 PM
Thank You Snoopy.....aahhhhhhhhhhh....the water feels just fine....might as well dive in,

Nice to *meet* you too.

Destiny.....doing the backstroke ;-)


Title: Re: Hello Monkies! New to forum
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 04:54:25 PM
Quote from: "Destiny"
I've just joined, but have been reading here for a long time.

Decided to stick my toe in the water and see how it feels ;-)

Came here from a link at BFN....you have a very nice bunch here in the cage.

CBB...I think, I have an avitar I'd like to use, but alas don't have that particular savy. If I email it to someone...hint...hint....pretty please may I get some help?

Oh....BTW, Joran's book will be his unwinding....POS that he is, he can't stop the diarrhea of the mouth.

Destiny.....

Welcome Destiny.  Klaas is away at the moment but when she comes back I'm sure she will help you with your avatar.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 04:55:46 PM
Hi Destiny - I see you finally made it!  You can email me a picture if you have one that you want for your avatar.  You have my email addy.  If you don't have anything just tell me what you might like and I'll find you something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 04:57:06 PM
See I told you :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 04:57:48 PM
Quote from: "San"
See I told you :lol:

 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: casa on June 03, 2007, 05:05:05 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "casa"
Hey Monkeys!  Just popped in for a minute to see if anything was happening.  #3 daughter's roommate brought her home from college today.  Fever 102 and feeling really bad.  We are about to go see a doctor.  Will check in when we get back!!


Hope she gets to feeling better real soon casa.  Keep us updated.


Thanks snoopy!!!  She feels pretty rough right now!  Doctor did a strep test and a mono test.  Both were negative but she has an extremely high white blood count.  He says it is rare but he thinks she has nonbacterial strep.  She has a strong antibiotic and a pain medication.  She will stay with me tonight and tomorrow and if she feels up to it I will take her back to college tomorrow afternoon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 03, 2007, 05:06:54 PM
Hi, Destiny! Welcome to da monkey cages!

Hey, y'all, I have a serious legal question that I have posed in the lounge. Any of you smart primates know or have someone who knows family law?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 03, 2007, 05:09:01 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I just went over to FOB and they have posted an email addy for the FBI
to ask about the reward, etc. I am sure he will be glad to hear from them.
..
Why does anyone over there think they should be paid ? For what ? Any information they provided ?? Did they ever provide any useful information that would lead to the solution of the case ? Or was it to crap up the case thus providing assistance to the suspects and criminals ? Isn't that illegal ?
..


As mrs. red says.........stuck........on.......stupid


Please don't be offended anyone..........it's not meant to be a political statement, but everytime I hear the phrase "Stuck On Stupid" I visualiaze this picture:

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Stuck20On20Stupid-775982.jpg)


LMAO!!!! And I'm a liberal!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Destiny on June 03, 2007, 05:21:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Hi Destiny - I see you finally made it!  You can email me a picture if you have one that you want for your avatar.  You have my email addy.  If you don't have anything just tell me what you might like and I'll find you something.



San...yeppers, you were right!

Klass...Thank You, will email it to you, if it doesn't work.....dress me up in something so I don't feel so nekkid....and Thank You soooooooooo much for your help with registering.

Destiny....scored 22 on the test, shoe size 6 height 5ft.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 05:21:20 PM
Welcome to Destiny ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 05:28:56 PM
Not surprised that DeVries has any new info... after all what new info is there anyway(to us)? Joran is still the last one seen with Natalee and people don't usually get abducted twice in a lifetime yet alone twice in one nite.... not surprised.

DeVries is just a Dutch version of Greta. Oh wait that sounded really funny... LOL

There was plenty to use on the show that the majority of the public does not know. I guess DeVries took the easy way out and gave Joran and the slootie toots their final out...

DeVries leaves Natalee on the beach and pimps his ratings. Hardly surprised.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 05:31:34 PM
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 05:35:21 PM
Destiny - here is your avatar.  I'd like you to try to add it yourself but if you can't I can do it for you.  All you need to do is this:

1.  Right mouse click on the link below
2.  Go to your profile and scroll down to the bottom where you add avatars.
3.  PASTE it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.
4.  Click on submit.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DestinyAvatar.gif)

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DestinyAvatar.gif


P.S. Lavender is my 2nd favorite color next to blue  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 05:38:15 PM
Hi monkeys. I just got back from a wedding at a Seventh Day Adventist church between an Ecuadoran groom and a Russian bride. That was a pretty interesting experience.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 05:41:28 PM
No one did a serious update on this case and it is hard to understand why.  A lot of interesting things have happened over the past year.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 05:42:14 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Hi monkeys. I just got back from a wedding at a Seventh Day Adventist church between an Ecuadoran groom and a Russian bride. That was a pretty interesting experience.  :D


Was there a reception, or do they not believe it them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 05:44:18 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
No one did a serious update on this case and it is hard to understand why.  A lot of interesting things have happened over the past year.


There is so much they all could have made a REAL show from... they choose not to and that's that!

I'm not getting excited again until I hear Paulus status has been officially revoked. Or Oduber is dead!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 05:47:25 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Hi monkeys. I just got back from a wedding at a Seventh Day Adventist church between an Ecuadoran groom and a Russian bride. That was a pretty interesting experience.  :D


Was there a reception, or do they not believe it them?


There was a reception, but we ended up not staying for it. The invitation said the wedding started at 3:00. We got there a little before 3:00, and there were no ushers, so we seated ourselves. As it turned out, there just weren't any ushers, and people sort trickled in for about 45 minutes, and then the wedding started at 3:50. After the wedding we went to the reception and sat around for about 30 minutes, but never saw anything of the bride and groom, so we left cause we had stuff we had to do. It was a pretty wedding, but I can't get into that South American things of time not mattering. :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 05:50:10 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
No one did a serious update on this case and it is hard to understand why.  A lot of interesting things have happened over the past year.


There is so much they all could have made a REAL show from... they choose not to and that's that!

I'm not getting excited again until I hear Paulus status has been officially revoked. Or Oduber is dead!


It’s getting very hard to get excited about anything to do with this case, because any news makes a splash and then nothing but dead silence.  If people start getting arrested, my eyes and ears may perk up again but right now I just don’t know what it would take.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Destiny on June 03, 2007, 05:57:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Destiny - here is your avatar.  I'd like you to try to add it yourself but if you can't I can do it for you.  All you need to do is this:

1.  Right mouse click on the link below
2.  Go to your profile and scroll down to the bottom where you add avatars.
3.  PASTE it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.
4.  Click on submit.


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DestinyAvatar.gif)

http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/DestinyAvatar.gif


P.S. Lavender is my 2nd favorite color next to blue  :wink:


Thank You Oh Mighty One of Avitars.... ;-)

Destiny....not nekkid anymore!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 05:59:05 PM
I just don't get into watching food eating contests, but how does a person feel the day after scarfing down 59 hotdogs w/buns?   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 06:02:56 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just don't get into watching food eating contests, but how does a person feel the day after scarfing down 59 hotdogs w/buns?   :shock:


Easy- we were watching it once at a family function...Kile July $th or something... and the announcer said, 'he's the best EATER ever!' I was like WTF!!!!

Isn't eating something that comes naturally to everyone but Nicole Ritchey?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 06:04:03 PM
I need to type slower.... m  u   c   h   s  l   o w  e  rrrrrr


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 03, 2007, 06:04:53 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just don't get into watching food eating contests, but how does a person feel the day after scarfing down 59 hotdogs w/buns?   :shock:


I imagine pretty "crappy"!  :smt082  :smt082 :smt082  :smt082


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 06:07:13 PM
Easy - Did you have a nap this afternoon?

I sacrificed mine in order to attend that wedding.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 06:11:37 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I just don't get into watching food eating contests, but how does a person feel the day after scarfing down 59 hotdogs w/buns?   :shock:


I imagine pretty "crappy"!  :smt082  :smt082 :smt082  :smt082


Yep, for a longggggggg time too! lol

I don't even like to think about eating 59 hotdogs......... with no mustard, chili and onions!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 06:13:00 PM
Is Dana on tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 06:13:27 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Easy - Did you have a nap this afternoon?

I sacrificed mine in order to attend that wedding.  :(


I got a short nap, but this has not been a good nap weekend for some reason.  Tomorrow I will probably want to nap all day long!  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 06:14:45 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Is Dana on tonight?


Yeah, and he has the thought print guy on tonight.  That should be interesting.  Not sure what to think of that guy, but it should be interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 06:22:00 PM
DANA PRETZER - TONIGHT

Sunday at 9pm ET

Guests

1. Dr Andrew Hodges  Forensic Thought Prints
2. Stephanie Good


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Destiny on June 03, 2007, 06:25:13 PM
Wher do I find the show?  Dana that is.

Thanks

Destiny


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 06:25:18 PM
After two years of HOPE... I'm kinda of tried of just HOPE. I want action already.

There is more than enough to charge these suspects with the Crimes Against Natalee. In any other Country in the World (well almost any) there would have been a trial and a conviction. This would already be over.

Imagine for a second the roles were all reversed. And an MB kid did this to an Aruban Girl. Do you think for one second this would not already be over? Do you think for one second that there would not have been cries from Aruba for extradition? Do you think for one second that the US Government would not extradite the suspect?

It's such a double standard it make me physically ill at times. While the Aruban Authorities drag Natalee, Beth and Dave through the mud, Justice is for another day and another Family.

Why them....what makes Joran and Paulus so freaking special? The answer is they are not special. They think they are and have convinced some other losers they should get special treatment.

The fact is Joran is borderline +++++++ and the case is closed on Paulus, he is a total, complete and abject failure. He is a failure as a parent and thank GOD he will never issue another ruling in any trial that involves a human being. No one deserves to have that pompous windbag decide their future based on skewed evidence.

Now when the heck is someone gonna do something to get Natalee her JUSTICE?

I'm tired of sending emails to the talking heads only to have them ignored. I'm tired of asking my congressman to do something only to have it fall on deaf ears. I'm tired of asking the State Dept to issue a travel advisory.

Who the heck do I need to convince that something needs to be done?

Does anyone care about Justice anymore? or is it just us?

Are we all that is really left in this Country that cares? If you can't stand up for Natalee, what can you stand up for?

Here we are two years later and still not one person in Authority seems to care about Natalee....

This not not the way it's supposed to be.

I want to see these suspects arrested and charged with Natalee's murder and abduction. What is so hard about that??? I know they have the evidence. I know they have it. Now someone do something!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 06:30:57 PM
Quote from: "Destiny"
Wher do I find the show?  Dana that is.

Thanks

Destiny

When it gets a little closer to showtime it will be on the front page of SM.  Or you can go to www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 06:40:39 PM
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 06:42:21 PM
Beats me Rob!  This has been the strangest crime case I have ever followed and I followed several at Court TV before Natalee disappeared.  This has been incredible and it is hard to determine who, what, when and why.  I still think the initial crime was pretty simple, but what happened afterward defies the imagination.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 06:47:06 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 06:49:40 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


 I did see a post SK made before I left for work this morning.
 At the end of it. she said all she wants is her hard drive back??   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 06:50:46 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Beats me Rob!  This has been the strangest crime case I have ever followed and I followed several at Court TV before Natalee disappeared.  This has been incredible and it is hard to determine who, what, when and why.  I still think the initial crime was pretty simple, but what happened afterward defies the imagination.


Easy- of course it was simple. That's WHY it's so STRANGE.

I've got a pretty good idea who, what, where and why... we all do. It should not take much to convince even a crooked Judge what happened here. They have all the technical evidence. And I'm sure they have stuff we have never even seen.

This isn't discovering the Law of the Universe.

Makes the comment by Jerry aka Waterboy all the more poignant. What's next ~ the Aruba Astronaut Program?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 06:53:52 PM
Hi Monkeys,

In total there are 29 users online :: 6 Registered, 0 Hidden and 23 Guests [ Administrator ] [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 183 on Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:16 pm
Registered Users: Easywriter, Grande, igsigs, mishy, Rob, truthseeker2, and Destiny and anyothers I missed.

It looks like the show was a big disappointment. I think we sometimes get our hopes up for nothing. I still keep thinking we will get Justice for Natalee. I also pray for it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 06:55:27 PM
Evening Monkeys

Welcome to the cage Destiny

Rob, since when does any American who has disappeared on that damn rock get any semblance of justice???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:00:56 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Welcome to the cage Destiny

Rob, since when does any American who has disappeared on that damn rock get any semblance of justice???


 Hey Yapz and Sam and yes.. welcome to Destiny.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 07:03:38 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Welcome to the cage Destiny

Rob, since when does any American who has disappeared on that damn rock get any semblance of justice???


 Hey Yapz and Sam and yes.. welcome to Destiny.


Hi Angie. Good day at work?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:04:55 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


I wonder why devries didn't solve this thing if he had SandraK's help.   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:05:15 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Welcome to the cage Destiny

Rob, since when does any American who has disappeared on that damn rock get any semblance of justice???


 Hey Yapz and Sam and yes.. welcome to Destiny.


Hi Angie. Good day at work?


 For once  .. yes it was   :D  Busy as hell and time flew by and it helps workig with someone you actually like and is funny as heck. We had fun and got alot done..  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:08:15 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "igsigs"
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


I wonder why devries didn't solve this thing if he had SandraK's help.   :P


 SandraK's post at FOB may not mean anything.. but found it interesting that she said all i want is my hard drive back> Now after renho says hers got stolen .. and SK posting she wants hers back?
Here is her post from FOB?  

Dearest, that $$ must be given to all of us!!

"which will help solve this case"

HELP??

that's very ambibuous. You helped . WE all Helped.  I was your" 1st FAN" nearly 2 years ago.

I been Kicked ,cursed ,and Ban..but I'm still around. Hoping for some truth.

 I was told,"I was "FOS"

I would just like my H/D back!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 07:08:50 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Welcome to the cage Destiny

Rob, since when does any American who has disappeared on that damn rock get any semblance of justice???


 Hey Yapz and Sam and yes.. welcome to Destiny.


Hi Angie. Good day at work?


 For once  .. yes it was   :D  Busy as hell and time flew by and it helps workig with someone you actually like and is funny as heck. We had fun and got alot done..  :)


Good for you!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 07:10:59 PM
Rash of H/D thieves hitting RU & FOB??

These folks harping about the reward need to remember:

1. Case not solved officially
2. Natalee has not been found

I would think that these 2 things would have to happen b4 any reward monies are paid out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:12:43 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "igsigs"
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


I wonder why devries didn't solve this thing if he had SandraK's help.   :P


 SandraK's post at FOB may not mean anything.. but found it interesting that she said all i want is my hard drive back> Now after renho says hers got stolen .. and SK posting she wants hers back?
Here is her post from FOB?  

Dearest, that $$ must be given to all of us!!

"which will help solve this case"

HELP??

that's very ambibuous. You helped . WE all Helped.  I was your" 1st FAN" nearly 2 years ago.

I been Kicked ,cursed ,and Ban..but I'm still around. Hoping for some truth.

 I was told,"I was "FOS"

I would just like my H/D back!!!


CircuitCity probably repo'd the thing.   :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: LilPuma on June 03, 2007, 07:13:35 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Tiger"
Kat,What NHL team has the most French Canadians?Who was that creature

?? Montreal Canadiens ?
I lost interest in hockey ages ago Tiger...
..
I guess I better keep quiet...
they might come and take my citizenship away.. or find out and come looking to take me away to the place where they indoctrinate / innoculate / vaccinate for these things here.


 :lol: I don't like our national past time -- baseball.  I do watch the Super Bowl and follow the NBA some.  So I think I'm safe.  The Super Bowl and NCAA March Madness have more viewers and generate more money than anything our President does, so I guess it's patriotic to support sports in the U.S.  I have always thought that all Canadians could ice skate.  Like it was required.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:15:13 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Rash of H/D thieves hitting RU & FOB??

These folks harping about the reward need to remember:

1. Case not solved officially
2. Natalee has not been found

I would think that these 2 things would have to happen b4 any reward monies are paid out.


I sure hope so, because this case has had more deadends than Paris Hilton's hair!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: LilPuma on June 03, 2007, 07:16:14 PM
Welcome Destiny.  Did you get your banana basket?  Shouldn't we have a banana basket as a welcome gift or something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:17:47 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Rash of H/D thieves hitting RU & FOB??

These folks harping about the reward need to remember:

1. Case not solved officially
2. Natalee has not been found

I would think that these 2 things would have to happen b4 any reward monies are paid out.


I sure hope so, because this case has had more deadends than Paris Hilton's hair!


  ROFL

Are you getting that zipper ready for half mast Mike?  :wink:
 On and I have not heard anything back yet ...gonna wait a few days and try another.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: msmarple on June 03, 2007, 07:21:01 PM
I'm reposting this - and adding some info..

Posted by Richard on the front page of SM 5/23/07:

Quote
The Aruba Tourism Authority will be taking part in a June 27-July 1 event for travel agents only at the Hilton Hotel on 2 Poydras Street in New Orleans.

The event is sponsored by www.vacations.com .

As always, VolunteersforNatalee@gmail.com is a contact address that will try to link up anyone interested.

We confronted Aruba Tourism Authority in Boston.
We confronted Aruba Tourism Authority in Miami.
Now we can take them on in New Orleans.

Stand up for Natalee!

No justice for Natalee … no tourists for Aruba.



If you’re interested, go to:
SM ATA Travel Show thread, page 5 or 6  -
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=1003&start=80

Hilton Neworleans – Riverside – site:
http://www1.hilton.com/en_US/hi/hotel/MSYNHHH-Hilton-New-Orleans-Riverside-Louisiana/index.do
Two Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana
Tel: 1-504-561-0500
The hotel faces the Mississippi River and is “right at” the French Quarter.

* * *

I *think* 2 from BFN are going. Also, per Richard, someone from BFN has offered a timeshare/condo for the first three days. Some of the signs Vicki prepared for the Miami show will be available.

Don't we have some Louisiana & Mississippi monkeys?

Two people can't stand around for five days ...

AND - monetary donations also are helpful. Not for travel/lodging, but for flyers, signs (if needed), possibly parking, permit fee, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: msmarple on June 03, 2007, 07:24:55 PM
Welcome Destiny. Double welcome from another Georgian.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 07:28:08 PM
O/T

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19004955/wid/11915773?GT1=10019

<snip>

DENVER - A federal microbiologist, the father-in-law of the man quarantined with a drug-resistant form of tuberculosis, will be investigated to see how he was involved in the case, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Frijole on June 03, 2007, 07:32:31 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
I see Joran says DeVries stole his manuscript in the *break-in*.

dOz thAT mEan DEVrees iz wERkin wit SandRaK? :arrow:

She released it! :batman:


Oh my God that is so funny Igs.... thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:33:17 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
O/T

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19004955/wid/11915773?GT1=10019

<snip>

DENVER - A federal microbiologist, the father-in-law of the man quarantined with a drug-resistant form of tuberculosis, will be investigated to see how he was involved in the case, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced.
]

 That pic reminds me of JORAN looking out of his apt window!  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:34:14 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
O/T

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19004955/wid/11915773?GT1=10019

<snip>

DENVER - A federal microbiologist, the father-in-law of the man quarantined with a drug-resistant form of tuberculosis, will be investigated to see how he was involved in the case, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced.


Something is up with that, but what?  Strange......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on June 03, 2007, 07:34:53 PM
OT - visual in Amsterdam

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277456,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 07:35:03 PM


So how is it these ppl at FOB or RU think they have solved the case
Last I heard Joran was still free and roaming the streets
Until he is behind bars case NOT solved :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:36:08 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Rash of H/D thieves hitting RU & FOB??

These folks harping about the reward need to remember:

1. Case not solved officially
2. Natalee has not been found

I would think that these 2 things would have to happen b4 any reward monies are paid out.


I sure hope so, because this case has had more deadends than Paris Hilton's hair!


  ROFL

Are you getting that zipper ready for half mast Mike?  :wink:
 On and I have not heard anything back yet ...gonna wait a few days and try another.  :wink:


I guess Paris will be getting her jumpsuit tomorrow, or Tuesday.  The real pisser about that whole thing is that she will make a ton of money off the deal when she gets out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:38:50 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
OT - visual in Amsterdam

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277456,00.html



 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:43:49 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Rash of H/D thieves hitting RU & FOB??

These folks harping about the reward need to remember:

1. Case not solved officially
2. Natalee has not been found

I would think that these 2 things would have to happen b4 any reward monies are paid out.


I sure hope so, because this case has had more deadends than Paris Hilton's hair!


  ROFL

Are you getting that zipper ready for half mast Mike?  :wink:
 On and I have not heard anything back yet ...gonna wait a few days and try another.  :wink:


I guess Paris will be getting her jumpsuit tomorrow, or Tuesday.  The real pisser about that whole thing is that she will make a ton of money off the deal when she gets out.


Yep.. and it sucks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:44:07 PM
Is it almost show time, or is that still an hour away?  I can't keep up with the schedule.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:46:14 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Is it almost show time, or is that still an hour away?  I can't keep up with the schedule.


 I think Klaas posted it comes on at EST


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:46:14 PM
I'm bored tonight.  There is no news and nothing on TV worth watching.  I wonder if it possible for one forum to rumble with another forum.  That could kill a few minutes.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 07:46:56 PM
Easy IIRC Dana's show is at 9pm est

Wonder if the Dr has seen the excerpts from the goon child's book. Would like to hear his thoughts on it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:47:17 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Is it almost show time, or is that still an hour away?  I can't keep up with the schedule.


 I think Klaas posted it comes on at EST


Good!  I think..... lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 07:48:04 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Is it almost show time, or is that still an hour away?  I can't keep up with the schedule.


 I think Klaas posted it comes on at EST


 :oops:  I mean at 9 EST


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 07:48:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA PRETZER - TONIGHT

Sunday at 9pm ET

Guests

1. Dr Andrew Hodges  Forensic Thought Prints
2. Stephanie Good


9 ET - in about an hour or so  :wink:

www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:49:28 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Easy IIRC Dana's show is at 9pm est

Wonder if the Dr has seen the excerpts from the goon child's book. Would like to hear his thoughts on it.


Okay, still an hour away.  I would like to hear his thoughts on that too.  I would also like for him to thought print FOB and RU.   :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 07:50:58 PM
Reminder my show tonight at 9pm est.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:51:53 PM
What is Stephanie Goode going to talk about?  I was searching for stuff last night and came across her myspace boards.  Interesting....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:53:48 PM
Dana - Whacha gonna ask Hodges?  Or, are you just going to turn him loose on the airwaves?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 07:54:39 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dana - Whacha gonna ask Hodges?  Or, are you just going to turn him loose on the airwaves?

Dana won't have to ask any questions because Hodges will already know what those questions are  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 07:59:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dana - Whacha gonna ask Hodges?  Or, are you just going to turn him loose on the airwaves?

Dana won't have to ask any questions because Hodges will already know what those questions are  :wink:


LOL  I just had a flashback to Carnac the Magnificent!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:02:26 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dana - Whacha gonna ask Hodges?  Or, are you just going to turn him loose on the airwaves?

Dana won't have to ask any questions because Hodges will already know what those questions are  :wink:


LOL  I just had a flashback to Carnac the Magnificent!


(http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/e/e1/180px-Johnny_as_carnac.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 03, 2007, 08:02:29 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Reminder my show tonight at 9pm est.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Dana ... I do not know what I am doing wrong but I have been unable to access any of your your shows following the Scared Monkey connection or ... listen to your archived programs.  I am fully dependent on the discussion on the forum or ... much appreciated unofficial transcripts provided by others ... to keep me informed.

Red ... Klaas and ... others have attempted to baby-step me through but ... to no avail.

Woe is me!  :cry:

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:03:37 PM
Janet - are you on dial-up?  If not..what happens when you try to access the program?  Have you worked with Tom on it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Destiny on June 03, 2007, 08:03:52 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Welcome Destiny.  Did you get your banana basket?  Shouldn't we have a banana basket as a welcome gift or something?


Did you say....Banana Basket?    Happy Happy Joy Joy!!!

I wuv Banana Baskets!!!

Glad to be here.......speaking of bananas, I'd sure like to see Papa Sloth with one foot in the pokey, and the other foot on a banna peel.....just slide on in Papa Sloth....that is, if Mama Sloth let's you off your very short leash :-0

IMHO...Mama Sloth has a big handful of leashes.

Destiny


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 08:05:14 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Dana"
Reminder my show tonight at 9pm est.
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Dana ... I do not know what I am doing wrong but I have been unable to access any of your your shows following the Scared Monkey connection or ... listen to your archived programs.  I am fully dependent on the discussion on the forum or ... much appreciated unofficial transcripts provided by others ... to keep me informed.

Red ... Klaas and ... others have attempted to baby-step me through but ... to no avail.

Woe is me!  :cry:

Janet


DO you have Itunes downloaded or updated


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 08:07:32 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
What is Stephanie Goode going to talk about?  I was searching for stuff last night and came across her myspace boards.  Interesting....



Probably a great deal about her new book Exposed.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1P3MX2YKY94YS/ref=s9_rk_nickname


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:08:38 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm bored tonight.  There is no news and nothing on TV worth watching.  I wonder if it possible for one forum to rumble with another forum.  That could kill a few minutes.   8)


You start, and the rest of us will be right behind you.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 08:11:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dana - Whacha gonna ask Hodges?  Or, are you just going to turn him loose on the airwaves?

Dana won't have to ask any questions because Hodges will already know what those questions are  :wink:


LOL  I just had a flashback to Carnac the Magnificent!


(http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/e/e1/180px-Johnny_as_carnac.jpg)


I loved that guy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:11:19 PM
Quote from: "Destiny"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Welcome Destiny.  Did you get your banana basket?  Shouldn't we have a banana basket as a welcome gift or something?


Did you say....Banana Basket?    Happy Happy Joy Joy!!!

I wuv Banana Baskets!!!

Glad to be here.......speaking of bananas, I'd sure like to see Papa Sloth with one foot in the pokey, and the other foot on a banna peel.....just slide on in Papa Sloth....that is, if Mama Sloth let's you off your very short leash :-0

IMHO...Mama Sloth has a big handful of leashes.

Destiny


  Welcome.. I dont have any nanas but will a hug suffice?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 08:11:26 PM
Janet what music player program is on your puter?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 03, 2007, 08:11:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - are you on dial-up?  If not..what happens when you try to access the program?  Have you worked with Tom on it?


Klaas ...

1.  I have wireless internet.
2.  I click the blue icon - LISTEN LIVE TO DANA PRETZER CLICK HERE
3.  A grey box appears - DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THIS FILE OR FIND A PROGRAM ON LINE TO OPEN IT?

I do not have a clue what to do at this point.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:13:50 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - are you on dial-up?  If not..what happens when you try to access the program?  Have you worked with Tom on it?


Klaas ...

1.  I have wireless internet.
2.  I click the blue icon - LISTEN LIVE TO DANA PRETZER CLICK HERE
3.  A grey box appears - DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THIS FILE OR FIND A PROGRAM ON LINE TO OPEN IT?

I do not have a clue what to do at this point.

Janet


 Janet you may have to load WinAmp.. I had to.. and have no problems with it. Yap gave me the link before.. I will look to see if I saved it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 08:13:57 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - are you on dial-up?  If not..what happens when you try to access the program?  Have you worked with Tom on it?


Klaas ...

1.  I have wireless internet.
2.  I click the blue icon - LISTEN LIVE TO DANA PRETZER CLICK HERE
3.  A grey box appears - DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THIS FILE OR FIND A PROGRAM ON LINE TO OPEN IT?

I do not have a clue what to do at this point.

Janet


When the box appears Click you want to choose the program
and If you have Itunes choose that program it doesnt open that second give it a minute to load then the itunes will open up and if Dana has music or show online you will start hearing it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:14:21 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - are you on dial-up?  If not..what happens when you try to access the program?  Have you worked with Tom on it?


Klaas ...

1.  I have wireless internet.
2.  I click the blue icon - LISTEN LIVE TO DANA PRETZER CLICK HERE
3.  A grey box appears - DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THIS FILE OR FIND A PROGRAM ON LINE TO OPEN IT?

I do not have a clue what to do at this point.

Janet


Janet, I keep telling everyone this, and I swear it works. I installed itunes on my computer, and the next time I tried to connect to Dana's show, it opened in itunes and started showing up on my itunes list. Whenever I want to hear him now, I open itunes, click on Scaredmonkeysradio, and it opens with no problems in a fraction of a second, and it sounds great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 08:14:45 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm bored tonight.  There is no news and nothing on TV worth watching.  I wonder if it possible for one forum to rumble with another forum.  That could kill a few minutes.   8)


You start, and the rest of us will be right behind you.  :wink:


LOL  Those people are so crazy they are not even interesting anymore.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 03, 2007, 08:15:05 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Janet what music player program is on your puter?


Sue ... DO you have Itunes downloaded or updated.

I do not have a clue what you guys are talking about but ... my son-in-law is picking up the grandkids shortly ... I will get his assistance.

Sue and Yap ... thank you.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:15:14 PM
http://www.winamp.com//


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:15:27 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - are you on dial-up?  If not..what happens when you try to access the program?  Have you worked with Tom on it?


Klaas ...

1.  I have wireless internet.
2.  I click the blue icon - LISTEN LIVE TO DANA PRETZER CLICK HERE
3.  A grey box appears - DO YOU WANT TO SAVE THIS FILE OR FIND A PROGRAM ON LINE TO OPEN IT?

I do not have a clue what to do at this point.

Janet


Janet - just put dinner on the table, I'll get back to you in a few minutes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:15:51 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm bored tonight.  There is no news and nothing on TV worth watching.  I wonder if it possible for one forum to rumble with another forum.  That could kill a few minutes.   8)


You start, and the rest of us will be right behind you.  :wink:


LOL  Those people are so crazy they are not even interesting anymore.


Well, I'll have to be nice to them now that they've proven they like me best by posting my avatar twice.  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 08:17:18 PM
Does anyone here still use dial-up and can get the program without any problems?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 08:17:52 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Janet what music player program is on your puter?


Sue ... DO you have Itunes downloaded or updated.

I do not have a clue what you guys are talking about but ... my son-in-law is picking up the grandkids shortly ... I will get his assistance.

Sue and Yap ... thank you.

Janet


http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 03, 2007, 08:19:03 PM
Thanks BT and Angie

I am sure that my son-in-law will comprehend exactly what you all are trying to get through my thick skull.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 08:19:42 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
I'm bored tonight.  There is no news and nothing on TV worth watching.  I wonder if it possible for one forum to rumble with another forum.  That could kill a few minutes.   8)


You start, and the rest of us will be right behind you.  :wink:


LOL  Those people are so crazy they are not even interesting anymore.


Well, I'll have to be nice to them now that they've proven they like me best by posting my avatar twice.  :P


That person posted blah's avatar over there a little earlier.  I think he/she is trying to imply something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:19:51 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Thanks BT and Angie

I am sure that my son-in-law will comprehend exactly what you all are trying to get through my thick skull.

Janet


Once you get it done, you won't believe how simple it will be to connect to Dana's show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 08:20:13 PM
Jan download Itune uncheck that crap for getting email stuff
so you dont get junk mail   it is FREE

you can clearly see where it says   Dowload Itune7.2   now thingee

email me if you have problem i willget you through it

rockymama@hotmail.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:29:35 PM
Janet - when you click on LISTEN LIVE and the screen comes up where it looks like it's asking you to download something, have you tried clicking on OPEN?  You shouldn't have to but that might work.  What should happen when you click on LISTEN LIVE is it should take you right to whatever program you have on your PC for listening to music.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 08:36:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - when you click on LISTEN LIVE and the screen comes up where it looks like it's asking you to download something, have you tried clicking on OPEN?  You shouldn't have to but that might work.  What should happen when you click on LISTEN LIVE is it should take you right to whatever program you have on your PC for listening to music.


I usually turn the feed on 15 minutes before the show starts so everyone can get their player working.

I'll do the same tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:37:23 PM
Ok, this FOB exchange was fun to watch:  :lol:  :lol:

Ree wrote:
Let's not leave Julia Renfro out of that list of liars.  After all she did report sonar and dogs at the Kalpoes on the last "search".


Siddalee wrote:
And guess what, dumbdodo, she was RIGHT!

Ree wrote:
Sorry, but she wasn't.  The KLPD did a walk through.  No equipment or dogs.  BTW, I wouldn't expect a family member not to come to her defense.


Siddalee wrote:
You fool, don't be so quick to judge. Go visit your pals, the monkkkeys, Jossy has pictures on their site of the dogs and the equipment

Ree wrote:
I'm not a monkey, but since you're so sure why don't you bring them here.  I do read other sites and I also heard Jossy say there were no dogs and no sonar, in fact no forensic personnel at the Kaploes.  Perhaps your confusing them with the Van Der Sloots?  Or perhaps, your just argumentive, because of who I insulted.  I mean nothing against you personally, but Julia is a bag of hot air.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:37:37 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Janet - when you click on LISTEN LIVE and the screen comes up where it looks like it's asking you to download something, have you tried clicking on OPEN?  You shouldn't have to but that might work.  What should happen when you click on LISTEN LIVE is it should take you right to whatever program you have on your PC for listening to music.


I usually turn the feed on 15 minutes before the show starts so everyone can get their player working.

I'll do the same tonight.

  TY! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:38:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Ok, this FOB exchange was fun to watch:  :lol:  :lol:

Ree wrote:
Let's not leave Julia Renfro out of that list of liars.  After all she did report sonar and dogs at the Kalpoes on the last "search".


Siddalee wrote:
And guess what, dumbdodo, she was RIGHT!

Ree wrote:
Sorry, but she wasn't.  The KLPD did a walk through.  No equipment or dogs.  BTW, I wouldn't expect a family member not to come to her defense.




Siddalee wrote:
You fool, don't be so quick to judge. Go visit your pals, the monkkkeys, Jossy has pictures on their site of the dogs and the equipment

Ree wrote:
I'm not a monkey, but since you're so sure why don't you bring them here.  I do read other sites and I also heard Jossy say there were no dogs and no sonar, in fact no forensic personnel at the Kaploes.  Perhaps your confusing them with the Van Der Sloots?  Or perhaps, your just argumentive, because of who I insulted.  I mean nothing against you personally, but Julia is a bag of hot air.


   ROFL I just read that myself about a minute ago!

Mama Sid to the resuce as always  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 08:38:54 PM
WTG REE!!!!!!  ROFLMAO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 08:39:50 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Dana - Whacha gonna ask Hodges?  Or, are you just going to turn him loose on the airwaves?

Dana won't have to ask any questions because Hodges will already know what those questions are  :wink:


LOL  I just had a flashback to Carnac the Magnificent!


(http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/e/e1/180px-Johnny_as_carnac.jpg)


I loved that guy!


http://www.johnnycarson.com/carson/carnac_main.jsp


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Hotshot on June 03, 2007, 08:41:34 PM
Help, players not working.....Is there something special we need?  Did I miss something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:42:39 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
WTG REE!!!!!!  ROFLMAO


 Check your email Yap.. Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:42:59 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Help, players not working.....Is there something special we need?  Did I miss something?

Doesn't start until 9pm - may not be up yet..give Dana a couple of minutes to get going.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:43:59 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Help, players not working.....Is there something special we need?  Did I miss something?


Try again now and see if it works.  I use RealPlayer and never have a problem.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:44:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Help, players not working.....Is there something special we need?  Did I miss something?

Doesn't start until 9pm - may not be up yet..give Dana a couple of minutes to get going.


I'm hearing him talk about the high school students who were denied their diplomas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:44:46 PM
DANA - good call on the preshow, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Hotshot on June 03, 2007, 08:46:14 PM
Thank-you.....got it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 08:46:29 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Help, players not working.....Is there something special we need?  Did I miss something?

Doesn't start until 9pm - may not be up yet..give Dana a couple of minutes to get going.


I'm hearing him talk about the high school students who were denied their diplomas.

Thats not the live feed thats a commentary click on the listen live icon, your almost there


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:47:38 PM
BTgirl - if you click on the icon on the front page of SM it should take you right there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:48:34 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Help, players not working.....Is there something special we need?  Did I miss something?

Doesn't start until 9pm - may not be up yet..give Dana a couple of minutes to get going.


I'm hearing him talk about the high school students who were denied their diplomas.

Thats not the live feed thats a commentary click on the listen live icon, your almost there


Hmmm.....what's playing now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:49:04 PM
I have it on and hear it well on WinAmp..  

If I ever find a girl..<dunno the name of the song..lol>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:49:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
BTgirl - if you click on the icon on the front page of SM it should take you right there.


I always get there by going through itunes, not the FP. Usually takes me straight there. Hmmmm........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
BTgirl - if you click on the icon on the front page of SM it should take you right there.


I always get there by going through itunes, not the FP. Usually takes me straight there. Hmmmm........

Try closing out and going back in now


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:50:33 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
I have it on and hear it well on WinAmp..  

If I ever find a girl..<dunno the name of the song..lol>


TY, I've got it now. I don't know why it didn't connect to Dana immediately like it usually does.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:50:37 PM
Dana?

  Order lunch?  ROFL    :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 08:50:50 PM
Evening Monkeys, reading back, but just wanted to ask has there been anything new? anything new about Aruba and clash with Venezuela?

I have Dana on , WOW I usually have to listen to Pod cast. :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 08:51:51 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monkeys, reading back, but just wanted to ask has there been anything new? anything new about Aruba and clash with Venezuela?

I have Dana on , WOW I usually have to listen to Pod cast. :)


Nope, nothing new


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 08:52:29 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monkeys, reading back, but just wanted to ask has there been anything new? anything new about Aruba and clash with Venezuela?

I have Dana on , WOW I usually have to listen to Pod cast. :)


Well its great to have you welcome to the program !!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 08:55:18 PM
BT - I've been thinking about food all weekend and I think it expanded my life.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 08:57:13 PM
:lol: ROFLMAO :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 08:58:27 PM
Hello Monkeys,
Finished catch-up reading.
All ready to listen to Dana's show - in Winamp.

Welcome to Destiny - nice to have a new monkey and one that talks to us.

Hey hey we're the monkeys .....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 08:58:28 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
BT - I've been thinking about food all weekend and I think it expanded my life.   :shock:


Life huh? Is that you're calling it now?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 08:58:51 PM
If there is anyone here who can transcribe the show a little please do. I am on dialup and all I get is a few seconds at a time due to something called buffering.

Yes Angie it is ok to do typos. LOL It seems I have gotten quite good at that myself.

I get a laugh out of reading Seawolfs post on BFN. In fact I think it was a shame that Facil was outed at RU. I was enjoying those post as well. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 08:59:11 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Hello Monkeys,
Finished catch-up reading.
All ready to listen to Dana's show - in Winamp.

Welcome to Destiny - nice to have a new monkey and one that talks to us.

Hey hey we're the monkeys .....

  Evening Sweety


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:00:59 PM
Hey Dana - that is my kind of music.
Did anyone see Tiger jiving outside the cage?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:02:24 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Hello Monkeys,
Finished catch-up reading.
All ready to listen to Dana's show - in Winamp.

Welcome to Destiny - nice to have a new monkey and one that talks to us.

Hey hey we're the monkeys .....

  Evening Sweety


Good morning sweetie    :lol:  :lol:
Hope you are having a better day today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:02:55 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
If there is anyone here who can transcribe the show a little please do. I am on dialup and all I get is a few seconds at a time due to something called buffering.

Yes Angie it is ok to do typos. LOL It seems I have gotten quite good at that myself.

I get a laugh out of reading Seawolfs post on BFN. In fact I think it was a shame that Facil was outed at RU. I was enjoying those post as well. :wink:


I've got the same problem, but I just let it go.  It seems to pick up where it drops out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:03:14 PM
Whew!! Just made it in time.   :D

Hello monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:03:47 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Hello Monkeys,
Finished catch-up reading.
All ready to listen to Dana's show - in Winamp.

Welcome to Destiny - nice to have a new monkey and one that talks to us.

Hey hey we're the monkeys .....

  Evening Sweety


Good morning sweetie    :lol:  :lol:
Hope you are having a better day today.


Hi Tibro.

If you know any good books on Zen Buddhism you need to recommend them to me. I'm reading one now that seems to mostly be about people losing their oxen.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Red on June 03, 2007, 09:04:39 PM
Tim Miller had been going back, planned for over a year. Nothing Tim is doing is based upon what this man has ever said.

If he wants to be a team player, that is fine.

But lets just get the facts correct.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:04:46 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monkeys, reading back, but just wanted to ask has there been anything new? anything new about Aruba and clash with Venezuela?

I have Dana on , WOW I usually have to listen to Pod cast. :)


Well its great to have you welcome to the program !!!


Thanks Dana


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:05:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monkeys, reading back, but just wanted to ask has there been anything new? anything new about Aruba and clash with Venezuela?

I have Dana on , WOW I usually have to listen to Pod cast. :)


Nope, nothing new


Thanks for the upate Klaas


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:06:02 PM
Hi BT - have not gone into Zen that much.  Read their macro diet and it sort of turned me off  :wink:  :wink:
I like their gardens though


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: IndyDan on June 03, 2007, 09:06:21 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!

Me too Rob!!  It's time to pull off the gloves. F them All!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:07:21 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
If there is anyone here who can transcribe the show a little please do. I am on dialup and all I get is a few seconds at a time due to something called buffering.

Yes Angie it is ok to do typos. LOL It seems I have gotten quite good at that myself.

I get a laugh out of reading Seawolfs post on BFN. In fact I think it was a shame that Facil was outed at RU. I was enjoying those post as well. :wink:


  Hi Sam.. sorry I have already missed part of the interview  :( I cant keep up that well.. I will try?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:08:26 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Whew!! Just made it in time.   :D

Hello monkeys.


 Hi Lalas..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:08:41 PM
DANA  - ask him what his profiling said about OJ


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:10:20 PM
Hey Angie.  Do we have a new monkey?  I think I saw a new poster on the lively today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:10:44 PM
Talking about the Deepak email.  Dana is saying anyone could say he was Deepak sending it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:11:06 PM
Dana talking about the Deepak email.  Dr. Hodges says that email is legit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 09:11:54 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!

Me too Rob!!  It's time to pull off the gloves. F them All!!


AGREED, Im with you guys!  

Rob, let's talk.  Email me, we need to re-examine some details and make some inquiries!  Anyone else interested in doing the same, email Rob or myself.  

WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:12:40 PM
The Dr. looks for "message markers".  Things that document the truth through the unconscious.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:13:24 PM
Is Hodges talking about one of those 2 early emails posted to the internet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:13:39 PM
Oh Danny boy..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 09:14:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA  - ask him what his profiling said about OJ


Probably the same thing it said to all of us Klaas. :lol:  :lol:

Seriously , I think we have all on here been profiling by thoughtprints.We have been seeing the connections between the lines of Jorans lies.JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:14:17 PM
...sorry the one we read her supposed to be written by deepak?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:14:21 PM
Dr. is talking about the unconsious mind of Deepak.  Says there was clearly a "death" code.  Claims the HI and mentioning she fell and was injured was indications he knew she was dead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:15:10 PM
Ask him the significance of the shark story!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:15:23 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Is Hodges talking about one of those 2 early emails posted to the internet?

Yep, the Deepak emails posted by Wonderwoman that were alegidly sent to their mutual (old lady) friend Betty.  I don't doubt that Deepak sent those emails, but of course we all know they were lies and most likely sent as a suggestion of PVDS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:16:18 PM
Deepak's sexual images such as what Natalee and Joran were doing in the back seat indicates a sexual assault. Dr. thinks she was choked during the assault.  Dr. refers to these as "thought prints.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 09:16:21 PM
we have been down this road a hundred times

we have looked at it ALL

<-------------waiting patiently for the DUTCH to arrest em all  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:17:39 PM
He's making referneces to rooms and containers as images, but I am afraid I am losing him on this.  Claims that Deepak refers to rooms and bars and this is some kind of thought print.  I don't understand it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:18:14 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!

Me too Rob!!  It's time to pull off the gloves. F them All!!


Fok die Joran, die Deepak, die Satish, die Paulus.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:18:22 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
...sorry the one we read her supposed to be written by deepak?

That is what I understand. Said he had authenticated it and spoke to person who received it?  Also via Dan Riehl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:18:53 PM
Accoarding to Hodges...the dropping her off at the HI is indicative of where he left the body...I didn't say I understood it...just saying ....claims that Deepak is trying to tell us where the body is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:19:39 PM
Claims Deepak is suffering from "unconsious guilt". That he wants the body discovered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:20:13 PM
Dr. doesn't think any of the 3 perps will ever come forward with info until something breaks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:20:33 PM
06/23/2005 1:02 AM      
 

for what it is worth, here are emails that deepak sent to his friend prior to being arrested:

dated 6/5/2005


How are you i hope you and your family is fine.(NAME DELETED) is better i tell you the truth , before it will be a shock for you later, but i think it will be a shock for you rightnow.
The missing girl natalee hollaway,I spoke to her , sunday she left with me , my brother and a friend from carlos n' charlies , it was my car like the news said she got in to, I am one of the persons of intrest , i am one the the students they've questioned and released as they claimed in the news .
Let see where to start i don't even know where to begin these last days where so crazy for me i'm very tired haven't slept good in days : The story starts sunday night when a friend of mine was playing poker at a local casino (in the holiday inn) after he won the poker at the fourth place he decided to get up and play some blackjack so he went to the blackjack table and there was natalee (they were a lil drunk ) so my friend started playing blackjack and he was winning quite good , so then natalee approached him and introduced herself and said to him'' your a lucky guy , can you help me win some of my money back i lost $ 360 , of my fathers money'' so my friend said ok , why not . so he started playing and he won 100 $ for her back and he said hey thats the best i can do for you because i doubt it i can win more money for you so its better i quit so she said ok but at least let me buy you a drink so they went to the bar (in the casino ). so they took a drink and started talking etc. about school, the vacation etc.etc.afterwards my friend had to go and she said that ''today is my last day i will be in carlos n' charlies will you be there'' and my friend said well i have school tomorrow i don't think so . well she begged him and he still said yes i'll be there.So that was in the casino i was not present , i was at work so my friend called me and said hey i met some girls in the casino and her friends and they want us to meet them in carlos tonight do you have to work tomorrow morning i said no , so he said pick me up later then i said ok. so i got off my shift at 10 pm and went home took a bath had to fix something and then me and my younger brother went to pick up my friend was around 12.10 am so i came to his home and was talked for like 15 min and then left to go to carlos (we all went out without or parents knew) so we arrived like 12.30 am in carlos (carlos is closing 1 pm ) and headed straight for the bar and bought 3 drinks my friend paid for them, so besides the bar there is a stage and people were dancing and there was natalee dancing too (thats the first time i saw her )and she was calling my friend to get on the stage and dance with her my friend laughed and refused so after the song was finished she came up to my friend and asked why he won't dance with her , i only heared that part because i was talking to someone else so i don't know what he responded(by then natalee was VERY drunk)so as i said i was talking to someone when i turned i had lost my brother , natalee and my friend. well they were announced that they were closing soon so i thought well maybe they' re waiting for me by the car its better i go there so i went to my car and nobody was there so i started playing music and was waiting on my brother and my friend.i waited for like 10 min and then i saw my brother stepping in the car and my friend who was with natalee. so i was surprised but anyways i started the engine and my brother was besides me and my friend and natalee were in the backseet so i started cruising in the area and asked my friend whats going on so natalee responded to me ''hey its no prob let us just drive around and have fun its my last night , she said you can drop me off later at holiday inn anyways right'' i said sure why not so as i was drove out of the carlos road and got on the mainroad there were natalees friends and she , pushed het head out of the window and screamed something i can't recall.so i was driving very slow to make a left to get in the next road and then one of natalees friend screamed for her to get out of the car , and she refused so then i stopped my car and i said natalee if your friends want you to go with them its better you go listen to them and go with them , she said no i will stay with you guys i will get a lift from you anways later, so she said bye to her friends and i drove away, so then we were just talking etc, in the car and then she said she wanted to see sharks ,it was by the lighthouse she saw them before that can we go , my friend said ok ,deepak lets go. so on my my to the lighthouse there was music playing and noone talking for a while when i looked in the backmirror my friend and natalee were kissing and touching (his hands etc was in her blouse but nothing nude or against natalees will ) so my brother siad just leave them for a while untill we get to the lighthouse, when i arrived at the lighthouse i said well here is the lighthouse they did not pay attention to me , so my brother said lets return (i did not stop anywhere not for a min only trafficlights) so after like 10 min my friend is telling me that natalee fell asleep i said you kidding just wake her up and tell ask her if its holiday inn for sure she is staying so my friend woke her up and confirmed with natalee she was staying at the holiday inn, so i drove to the lobby driveway of holiday inn and then we woke her up, she got out of the car and fell on the floor my friend said damn she fell and then rushed out of the same door natalee came out and picked her up immediately, after she stood up she pushed my friend and said leave me alone or something like that i can't recall , my friend offered to help het to her room she said no. she he stepped in the car and while i was driving away i saw natalee walking towards the lobby and a gentleman with a walkie talkie and black clothes approached her and i think they were talking and i had never seen natalee again sinds.(holiday inn has no cameras in the driveway or lobby) it was around 2.15 am .monday i came to work normally 4- 11 pm after work i called my friend i said whats up he said ok i'm at the raddison casino meet me there , i said ok so i went there we played poker , we had some drinks and chat and then we had enough and decided that this casino was booring lets go to whyndham hotel casino . so i drove to whyndham and as i was parking my friends dad called him and said the police is at his home with some family members its about the girl you guys went out with yesterday , so my friend said wait there i be there, so we rushed at my friends home and there was the police and nataless family and it was a nightmare sinds then. the police asked us if we knew this girl showed us a picture we said yes thats her , they said she was missing and eyewitness say she was the last seen with you guys . so they asked a few more questions and we said we don't understand we left her at holiday inn lobby drive way how could she dissapear and then natalees stepfather jumped and said ''yes thats because after she went with you assholes she lost'' and then my friends father jumped and said thats enough you can't talk to the kids like that this is not the us your out of you juristiction this is not the way i want you people out of my yard i know the law (my friends father is e judge) so afterwards another family member of natalee suggested to the police if we can id the security gard we said ok. we went there there was no suck security working there as we discribed. so then we were just standing in the lobby there were questions etc. asked by other members , and then me and my friend walked to the car natalees mom was sitting and we said mam you have to believe us we did not do anything with you daughter, she was crying and said i don't believe you 2 , i promise you i will make you life a living hell because of this . anwyas we said we were sorry again ans that we will help in any way possible.i went home 7 pm tuesday, i was then called 2 pm by the police for questioning i went gave a statement they said i was a witness no suspect the same went for my brother and my friend they were questionded and had to sign their statement also , the checked my car and i was clear to go , wednesday i was called again to show them how i drove the route that day ( i could refuse was my right i still decided to go , as did my brother and friend ) the drove us one by one and then we were free to go again.thursday morning my friend called me (he goes to aruba international school and his mother is a teacher there and he is a straight A student ) in panic and said there a re family members here at school and they are sharing flyers and the flyers said : GIRL KIDNAPPED ASK JORAN VANDER SLOOT (thats my friends name ) the principle asked them to leave and they did .so thats my part of the story yesterday and today it was quiet no treathen phoncalls what we got before and i won't mention the crazythings the newspapers etc. writes about us its to much to mention. at home my mom is losing it she is cryimg constantly , my dad bloodpressure got high also his hands are red , my friends home is a disaster also ,his mom is crying constantly also his dad is pretty cool he calmes us down and talks to us also not to worry , my brother is preety cool but on his face you see he is worried , my friend is pretty worried also. i'm pretty worried also , we have 2 lawyers one for my friend and one for me in case we get arrested and charched with something his dad can't defend hin he is a judge and he is too emotional attached .my friend has his graduation this thursday he has to go to the states in july he has a full scholarship. i had to go to vacation also end of this month.many politicians find we should be locked up rightnow.We heard a lot of false alarms that she was dead , she was seen with 2 guys , her hair is cut and is red now ,she was in a crackhouse etc, we were arrested and , my car is by the police we confessed to murder and rape, she went in a restaurant to buy food but none of those were true.So (name deleted) that was my part of the story what i said here is the same in my statement,people are saying they are bad guys lock them up , the family is going thru a lot righnow , but what they don't know how the other families feel and how they also have a reputation and carreers etc. because when this all is over they will still be talks that were the 3 guys that had something to do with the kidnap of natalee its a small island.they don't understand the pressure we are having also, if this girl turns up dead we have a problem we were the last seen with her . I lost a lot of friends who think we had to do something with this, many of my friends supported us also brought food etc. for us at home and know we are innocent, we are innocent also we promise i would NEVER hurt anyone in anyway, i would do every everything to help find her thats what we told eveyone also , i would take a bullet to save her and bring her back to her family if i had to so would my friend also.i would never never hurt anyone i'm a very happy and social person who likes to make friends with people and not hurting them


So (NAME DELETED) i will say goodbye now hope you believe me and i pray to god that they find natalee soon and find her well so that this nightmare ends for all of us and they we prove we had nothing to do with this, i hope you pray for all of us say hi to everyone there hope to hear from you soon and may god bless.........

bye bye

Deepak.

http://www.majorwager.com/fusetalk/22-133972-1.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 09:20:53 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
He's making referneces to rooms and containers as images, but I am afraid I am losing him on this.  Claims that Deepak refers to rooms and bars and this is some kind of thought print.  I don't understand it.


Thank you Lalas for transcribing.

Now Lals remember you are a Shango Tango gal. Just think like that . LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:21:14 PM
Dr. Hodges claims that Deepak unconsiously tells us where to look for Natalee's body.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: IndyDan on June 03, 2007, 09:21:51 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!

Me too Rob!!  It's time to pull off the gloves. F them All!!


AGREED, Im with you guys!  

Rob, let's talk.  Email me, we need to re-examine some details and make some inquiries!  Anyone else interested in doing the same, email Rob or myself.  

WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

I'm interested


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:22:27 PM
Dr. Hodges has spoken with Vinda De Sousa about his ideas.  Indicated that he was close to what they were thinking too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:22:53 PM
Not that it counts for anything, but my gut feeling has always told me that Natalee is in the ocean. I hope he and Tim are right and can finally get the evidence.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:24:17 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Angie.  Do we have a new monkey?  I think I saw a new poster on the lively today.


Hi Lala's.  We have a new motor cycle riding monkey named Destiny.

I would give this Doctor a lot more credence if he was stating all this 2 years ago and not now after everything has been looked at every way possible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:24:38 PM
Dana is pointing out that Dr. Hodges impressions are not a definite forensic evidence.  Talking about admissability in court.  States that Deepak equates a PV with this email.  I don't understand how he thinks this could be admissable in court. He's a bit foggy on that one too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 09:24:53 PM
dropped at the holiday inn

robots translation = dropped "IN" to something


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 09:25:29 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Angie.  Do we have a new monkey?  I think I saw a new poster on the lively today.


Hi Lala's.  We have a new motor cycle riding monkey named Destiny.

I would give this Doctor a lot more credence if he was stating all this 2 years ago and not now after everything has been looked at every way possible.


me too  8)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: IndyDan on June 03, 2007, 09:26:02 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!

Me too Rob!!  It's time to pull off the gloves. F them All!!


Fok die Joran, die Deepak, die Satish, die Paulus.......

At this point, I'm giving up on being optimistic. The California case killled my hope.  It's time for Shock and Awe.  
I hope they all die and sooner than later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:27:12 PM
Doesn't think  the email would ever see the light of day in court.


Talking about Joran...claims that he's confessing in between the lines.  Hodges says Natalee was never alone on the beach with Joran.  Dr. says she was never on the beach.

Joran claiming he left her on the beach...and she drown in the ocean is an indication that she is in the water.  Joran's reference to walking back to the beach to look for his shoes is an indication that she's in the water.


Thinks all 3 were there when she died.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:27:17 PM
Talking about Deepak email........

Dr said he made certain it was from Deepak and talked to the person in whom he sent it to?   :shock:

 Umm is he talking about WW?  She is the one who put it out there?  <my words>

Says poitive Deepak wrote it. but in his professional opinion. email he says.. do we have a confession? Looks for communication images..
Starts out saying he is gonna tell the truth.. <deepak>   A story.. association to Natalee.  Dr looks for things.. though print patterns.. loks for hints for a confession.
  There is cleraly a death code.. he said the missing girl.... mispelling her name.  Talking about her falling at the HI.. etc.. looking for sympblic thoughts.. sees a sexual induendo code..
  Thoughts of sudden death.. they lost her.. what would of happened.. DR feels they were choking her.. neck.. something around her neck.. at crucial moments Deepak .. in his email.. he feels she was assualting her.. he feels she aspirated.
  Dr feels shes in a container in the ocean..   he says think of something that contains a bodt.. Natalee is often in Deepaks car.. he even speaks of a bathtub.. striking things that Deepak sats she fals on the floor..another container can be a room,, where someone stays.. Deepak gives a small space inside a larger space. Its in sequence. Deepak tells the stroy scene by scene as if he is a movice director.
  Perfect scne.. they have her alone. shes in the backseat of his car.. perfect opp. to where they left the body.   Dr says its impossible for to have to speask on Hannity and COlmes in 2 minutes.
 Deepak wants them to find the body he says.. he looked Beth in the eyes and lied to her.. Beth had tears in her eyes..
   Deepak is miserable and whats the body found. Unconscience guilt the dr says.
 Dr feels something is gonna have to happen.. they need to be split.
 Deepak says in his letter. if they find they body.. we are gonan be in trouble. Says this email links Deepak to the body. Hes telling us where to search for the body.  Dave Hollowaty agrees.. DAR feels the body is discoverable.  Dr had a convo with Vinda..  an early profile.. her and KJ were impressed with the DR .. Arubans not showing FBI anything.. etc.
   Danas next ? ..  taking something like this to court?
Dr says this approach may be entered into court. Deepak links his letter,. equated police statement with his letter.  Admissable in court? I am sorry I missed that??   :oops:
  Dr feels there is hope for the future..  if the boys lawyers up.. Deepak he feels is linked to the body.
 No question ... Joran comes up with a story about the beach., they were neevr alone. he feels they were all with her to the end.  Joran makes an absurd comment she wondered in the ocean and drowned.  Dr says means shes in the water. Joran said he could have chekced the area.. and didnt.  3 boys killed her accidently and buried the body.  They are pointing fingers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 09:27:39 PM
Carnac lede in by Dana.  Mount Baldy.  What Mrs Yul Brenner did on her honeymoon, etc.

Elvis music.  Hard Knocks.

Monkey (Monkees) theme/bumper music.

Tonight.  Did you catch Hannity & Colmes, with guest Dr. Andrew Hodges, who has developed a method of profiling and examining oral messages = thought print.  He has theories through his thought print regards Natalee.  H&C (Dana thinks blew it).  They split-screened him with Tim Miller, who is going back not based on anything Dr. Hodges has to say, it became embarrassing.  He will join Dana in a minute and after that, "Exposed" author, Stephanie Good.

Johnny B. Goode (Chuck Berry).

Dana.  Dr. Andrew G. Hodges (see above) regards developing thought print decoding.  The unconscious mind posseses an intelligene deeper than our conscious mind. . . .

Dana thinks producers of H&C handled poorly, welcome of Dr. Hodges.

Dana states he did not think it was a well-done interview (H&C) and thinks the hosts were blind-sided, discussing Tim Miller - and how this was counter-productive and neither was able to counter the other --- he thinks they made it look as though Tim were going back based on thoughtprint.  Dr. Hodges has talked extensively with Dave.  Dave has tried to reach the Dutch.  Dr. Hodges is on team Holloway-Twitty and he and Tim are part of the same team, but they have not had extensive discussions and Dave is more familiar with him than Tim is, and Dr. Hodges thinks this was a poorly informed interview (interviewer).  He talked to Beth before going on and has talked extensively with Dave.  

Dana says he contacted him at urging of "audience." (monkeys?).

Dr. Hodges & Dana have swapped e-mails.  Dana is telling him of his past career and present work in law enforcement and looking at statement analysis, what their statement, written and verbal means.  Dana took a course in statement analysis.  The trainer was an Israeli Avignon Kapoor (pop in audio).  

He says his work is not like that, but 25 years in research.  He has an M.D. and Ph.D.  he has helped validate the thoughts of unconscious mind.  He did not "invent it" but validated it.  The unconscious mind is brilliant.  He spoke with FBI who wanted him to get into profiling.  He went from O.J. Simpson to JOn Benet Ramsey and BTK Killers, been hired by families in various cases.  He says his work has come mostly out of work with unconscious mind and has worked with law enforcement but not totally familiar with Dana's work in statement analysis.

If you take a written statement (accusatory or not) look at verbals, look between the lines and look and you can question that based on it, using their words.  

Dr. Hodges refers to using first-hand witnesses and witness statements.  He came in contact with an E-mail that Deepak wrote.  E-mail is E-mail and anyone can send and make it sound like anything.

Dana wants the e-mail discussed.  Dr. Hodges has talked to the person to whom it was sent.  It appeared on the Internet.  The person who put it out took a lot of heat (Wonder Woman).  Dan Riehl asked him to look at the e-mail and one of the MB mothers.  HE has interviewed a lot of students and people who were with Beth.  He knew that whoever wrote it knew a lot about the case.  He is positive in his professional opinion that Deepak wrote it.

Now, Dana asking for it to be broken down.  He is using for message markers.

Deepak starts out with powerful markers.  He starts out promising I will tell the story, the shocking truth.  This is a story and from beginning to end, he promises to tell.  He promises a confession.  He is now looking for thought print patterns.  

First question?  Is Natalee dead or alive.  You can look and tell if the person is dead.  There was clearly a death code.  He said the "missing girl, Natalee Holloway..."   She fell down, she got out of car -- this indicates she is dead.    She is dead.  What happened.  There are several sexual inunendos refer to rape, poker, blackjock.  No prob, no probe.
 
Joran had his hand in her blouse...no denial.  She was assaulted in the backseat.  There were sudden thoughts.  Suddenly the gambing stopped, the car stopped.  IT is clearly a sexual event.  She choked --- they were choking her during sex.  It is very clear.  Deepak 8-9 times said she is out ...he says he is not seeing her.  Someone is assaulting her.  They missed that she needed to throw up.  She aspirated.  Where is the body?  Numerous thought prints point to ocean, container.  

The thought prints to container and ocean.  Dana asks.  The container -- something that contains body -- throughout e-mail (container - car, boat, bathtub). Deepak talks about taking a bath, could be a bathtub.  Striking is that they talk about Natalee fell, she fell on floor and they kept asking her where is she staying?  Hotel.  Room is an address.  A container of people in a space.  One thing he does (Deepak) gives small space within a large space, bar within a bar, room within a hotel, she is in a container.  When they drop her off, Deepak tells the story scene by scene.  Where is he going to tell us they sexually assaulted her?  When they first got her alone in the car, in the backseat.  He describes that there was sex.  They dropped her off.  Where did you leave the body?  Where she stayed?  Container image.  Could be bathtub, could be a container in ocean, water and container are involved.  Impossible in 2-4 minutes to explain.

Deepak is telling where body is.  He unconsciously wants the body found.  He looked Beth in the eye and lied to her.  He told her.  She promised to make his life a living hell.  Deepak is miserable and wants Natalee found.

Dana:  We have analyzed this for two years.  We see and speculate and maybe it is part of his law enforcement, you may not have forensic evidence, but you have three suspects who are still suspects to this day.  Will this unconsciuos guilt become conscious?  Will someone testify against the other.

Doctor says no.  They have tried to break them.  To me, and Deepak says in letter, "if they find the body, we are in trouble...no body, no case.."  Deepak is saying find the body and solve the case.  The E-mail links Deepak to the case.  This e-mail links them to the body.  He is telling us specifically where to search for this body.  He and Dave had agreeement on this.  Without giving away the secret, Dave is in agreement and think they know where body is.

Dana asks if it went to ALE.  Talked to vin desouza.  Talked to karin jansin.  Dr. Hodges was trying to get witness statements.  Karin & Vin de Souza are impressed with him but they will not let him see police interviews.  They wanted to qualify him as an expert witness.  ALE DID NOT SHOW FBI ANYTHING.  

Aruba is not open to anything.  Experts not wanted.  

Dana asks as they are running out of time.  Taking this to court.  Defense lawyers would say this is just an interpretation.  Dana has had people with statement analysis and admits this is not DNA.

dr. Hodges says an attorney who supports his work from California, was in the court where DNA was first admittted and thinks this approach will someday be admitted.  Deepak makes case for this approach to be admissable in court.  He says this is his statement to police, this is my statement.  He equates E-mail with his police statement.  He thinks one day this can occur to use it in court, but not now.  Deepak admits this is quite admissable in his unconscious mind.  I think we are establishing the verbal mind, the psychology of the mind to forensic science.  He thinks this is the wave of the future.  Suppose (Dr. Hodges says) if these boys lawyer up and the body is found, this would be persuasive to a jury (the e-mail) but it would be up to lawyers but it would not see the light of day in Aruba.  That's a whole other court.  

Asking about Paulus.  He says Joran's interviews and all in this, Joran comes up with this story that he left her on the beach.  He was never alone with her on the beach, she was never alone with one.   there were these three boys all together.  He says he left Natalee alone.  He means he left her alone (left her asleep).  He says she is in the ocean dead, not wandering around asleep near beach.

I came near the area and I could have gone over to check to see if Natalee still there.  ? ? ? He is telling you --think of Natalee asleep in the ocean and she is staying asleep in water.  Deepak, Satish and Joran killed her accidentally and buried the body.  They are pointing fingers at each other.  He is going back through the "Joran killed her, Deepak killed" and it means they all three killed her.

He thinks if a body is found, there is an answer.

Break, next Stephanie Good.

Dana says, "can you say speculation?" ????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:28:01 PM
Dr Hodges says the 3 were together until the end with Natalee.

Can you say speculation? (Dana's last comment)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:28:35 PM
Apologizing now  for typos and ect. I could not keep up! Sorry  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:28:41 PM
Thanks Tylergal and Angie!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 09:28:44 PM


I have thought they were telling the story, just leaving out the
nasty details


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 09:29:25 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "Rob"
If I were Jug I would write a book called "Shock the World" and blow the doors off of Aruba.. F them!!!!!

Me too Rob!!  It's time to pull off the gloves. F them All!!


AGREED, Im with you guys!  

Rob, let's talk.  Email me, we need to re-examine some details and make some inquiries!  Anyone else interested in doing the same, email Rob or myself.  

WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

I'm interested


My email is tdbweb2003@yahoo.com, I will supply you with a 'proposal' of sorts.

No harm in asking some questions, right?  Just need to find that person that can provide some answers.  

I will look forward to talking to you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:29:39 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA  - ask him what his profiling said about OJ


Probably the same thing it said to all of us Klaas. :lol:  :lol:

Seriously , I think we have all on here been profiling by thoughtprints.We have been seeing the connections between the lines of Jorans lies.JMHO



Yes, indeed!!!  We have been doing this for 2 years now and didn't even know it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:30:26 PM
Thanks to everyone who transcribed. I don't know how y'all do that - especially when the person is talking fast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 03, 2007, 09:30:37 PM
Has the thought print guy been on yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:31:14 PM
By jove, I think I am a thought print expert!

Not sure how any of this points toward the location of a body, but I have always thought deep water.  That's the most available resource on an island and the easiest to take advantage of when in a hurry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:31:36 PM
I know there will be people who will mock me, but what Dr. Hodges said made sense to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:31:43 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Angie.  Do we have a new monkey?  I think I saw a new poster on the lively today.


Hi Lala's.  We have a new motor cycle riding monkey named Destiny.

I would give this Doctor a lot more credence if he was stating all this 2 years ago and not now after everything has been looked at every way possible.


If I understood him correctly...he has been talking with Beth and Dave about this for some time.  He didn't say how long...but did indicate they knew this for a while.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:32:42 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Has the thought print guy been on yet?


Yes Justins - Angie and Tylergal just posted a transcript.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:33:28 PM
Quote from: "robots"
dropped at the holiday inn

robots translation = dropped "IN" to something


Dr. Hodges claims this is a reference to her being in a container.  I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now I see where he thinks that anytime Deepak says they were in something or went into a room or a car or left her at the HI is a subconscious way of saying she's "in" something.  I think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 09:33:41 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Talking about Deepak email........

Dr said he made certain it was from Deepak and talked to the person in whom he sent it to?   :shock:

 Umm is he talking about WW?  She is the one who put it out there?  <my words>

Says poitive Deepak wrote it. but in his professional opinion. email he says.. do we have a confession? Looks for communication images..
Starts out saying he is gonna tell the truth.. <deepak>   A story.. association to Natalee.  Dr looks for things.. though print patterns.. loks for hints for a confession.
  There is cleraly a death code.. he said the missing girl.... mispelling her name.  Talking about her falling at the HI.. etc.. looking for sympblic thoughts.. sees a sexual induendo code..
  Thoughts of sudden death.. they lost her.. what would of happened.. DR feels they were choking her.. neck.. something around her neck.. at crucial moments Deepak .. in his email.. he feels she was assualting her.. he feels she aspirated.
  Dr feels shes in a container in the ocean..   he says think of something that contains a bodt.. Natalee is often in Deepaks car.. he even speaks of a bathtub.. striking things that Deepak sats she fals on the floor..another container can be a room,, where someone stays.. Deepak gives a small space inside a larger space. Its in sequence. Deepak tells the stroy scene by scene as if he is a movice director.
  Perfect scne.. they have her alone. shes in the backseat of his car.. perfect opp. to where they left the body.   Dr says its impossible for to have to speask on Hannity and COlmes in 2 minutes.
 Deepak wants them to find the body he says.. he looked Beth in the eyes and lied to her.. Beth had tears in her eyes..
   Deepak is miserable and whats the body found. Unconscience guilt the dr says.
 Dr feels something is gonna have to happen.. they need to be split.
 Deepak says in his letter. if they find they body.. we are gonan be in trouble. Says this email links Deepak to the body. Hes telling us where to search for the body.  Dave Hollowaty agrees.. DAR feels the body is discoverable.  Dr had a convo with Vinda..  an early profile.. her and KJ were impressed with the DR .. Arubans not showing FBI anything.. etc.
   Danas next ? ..  taking something like this to court?
Dr says this approach may be entered into court. Deepak links his letter,. equated police statement with his letter.  Admissable in court? I am sorry I missed that??   :oops:
  Dr feels there is hope for the future..  if the boys lawyers up.. Deepak he feels is linked to the body.
 No question ... Joran comes up with a story about the beach., they were neevr alone. he feels they were all with her to the end.  Joran makes an absurd comment she wondered in the ocean and drowned.  Dr says means shes in the water. Joran said he could have chekced the area.. and didnt.  3 boys killed her accidently and buried the body.  They are pointing fingers.


I exchanged a few emails with wonderwoman as well.  Unfortunately I was unable to get a confirmation on the source of the email or any other related details.  In any event, she is a troubled woman IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 09:33:44 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Apologizing now  for typos and ect. I could not keep up! Sorry  :oops:



thoughts ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:33:44 PM
Stephany Good on now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Red on June 03, 2007, 09:34:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey Angie.  Do we have a new monkey?  I think I saw a new poster on the lively today.


Hi Lala's.  We have a new motor cycle riding monkey named Destiny.

I would give this Doctor a lot more credence if he was stating all this 2 years ago and not now after everything has been looked at every way possible.


If I understood him correctly...he has been talking with Beth and Dave about this for some time.  He didn't say how long...but did indicate they knew this for a while.


He was saying this in th beginning????

You mean the MSM would not have had him on when NH was on nightly?

SM.com and .net and many Monkeys have been discussing the very same points since 6/05


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Red on June 03, 2007, 09:35:39 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Apologizing now  for typos and ect. I could not keep up! Sorry  :oops:



thoughts ?


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

I think we are in the presence of many experts on Scared Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sue on June 03, 2007, 09:35:49 PM


I think that is natalee is in the water, she is not far away
i just dont think they had alot of time specially during daylite hours
if that is when it took place and at night i just dont think they ventured that far away from the island


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 09:36:57 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Apologizing now  for typos and ect. I could not keep up! Sorry  :oops:



thoughts ?


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

I think we are in the presence of many experts on Scared Monkeys.


i agree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:37:40 PM
Red
If I understood him correctly he claims to be in contact with Dave especially about this.  He said that Dave knew what he thought about it and I also think he said that Dave agreed with him.  Well, I know we havbe all come to the same conclusions...problem is we can't prove it. That's the frustrating part.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 09:37:50 PM
We have been saying for 2 years now..there is a little truth in every lie.
What the Dr said makes sense to me too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 09:38:33 PM
she is in something

but i still say LAND

and i still say ABANDONED septic tank

easy to open, its quick and easily hidden


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 09:39:30 PM
Tyler and Angie Thank you and Great Job.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:39:31 PM
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:39:34 PM
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:41:27 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Apologizing now  for typos and ect. I could not keep up! Sorry  :oops:



thoughts ?


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

I think we are in the presence of many experts on Scared Monkeys.


Red, I think it is called life experience - you get an instinct that tells you when someone is lying.  The more extraneous details they add shows you what they are covering up.  Are we all amateur psychologists?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 09:42:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


What makes you think that?  Just curious..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 09:42:39 PM
Klaas I agree with you that Deepak sent the email but it was most likely for the most part drafted by Paulypuss or Joran to help establish an alibi or their story of the occurrences of that night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:43:23 PM
I agree yapperz, just as I feel there is alot of truth to the layered voice analysis and lie detector exams. the unconscious mind in something like an email likely hold alot of truth ie container=ocean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Red on June 03, 2007, 09:43:58 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Red
If I understood him correctly he claims to be in contact with Dave especially about this.  He said that Dave knew what he thought about it and I also think he said that Dave agreed with him.  Well, I know we havbe all come to the same conclusions...problem is we can't prove it. That's the frustrating part.


I am sure he has been in contact with Dave, thats not the point. WHEN?

We have been in contact with Dave and Beth since 6-7/05. I have never heard this guys name until very recently.

I have never seen this guy on TV, ever, prior to H&C.

The water searches that TES did in 2005, had nothing to do with this guy. TES was turned down a deep water search the day after Dave Holloway left Aruba. TES was already searching the water and asked for some help. Dompig declined.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:44:42 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


What makes you think that?  Just curious..


Which part, lol ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:45:10 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I know there will be people who will mock me, but what Dr. Hodges said made sense to me.


It makes sense to me too BT.  The subconscious mind is a very powerful thing and even in the worst of criminals they have an underlying wish to be found out and to have the guilt lifted.  It is their conscious mind that keeps the cover up in place and is aided by others that are involved around them keeping them under control.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:45:27 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Klaas I agree with you that Deepak sent the email but it was most likely for the most part drafted by Paulypuss or Joran to help establish an alibi or their story of the occurrences of that night.


Yep, I just said the same thing  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:45:50 PM
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 09:46:18 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:46:51 PM
Will someone please remind me what Dr. Hodges first name is? TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:47:58 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Will someone please remind me what Dr. Hodges first name is? TY


Andrew


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 09:48:03 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
dropped at the holiday inn

robots translation = dropped "IN" to something


Dr. Hodges claims this is a reference to her being in a container.  I didn't quite understand it at the time, but now I see where he thinks that anytime Deepak says they were in something or went into a room or a car or left her at the HI is a subconscious way of saying she's "in" something.  I think.


See Lalas I knew you could do it. Just like the Shango Tango right?


Tyler and Angie thank you for transcribing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Red on June 03, 2007, 09:48:04 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Will someone please remind me what Dr. Hodges first name is? TY


Andrew


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:48:19 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Will someone please remind me what Dr. Hodges first name is? TY


Andrew


Thanks, BB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:48:49 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


Even so the wording means that whoever drafted the email are just as guilty which would fit with our understanding of the 4 involved IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 09:50:02 PM
the DUTCH team could have shut this down weeks ago

they have not done that


its good


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:50:08 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Apologizing now  for typos and ect. I could not keep up! Sorry  :oops:



thoughts ?


  I thought it was very interesting Dana and TY for having the Dr on.
 Sorry.. had something to tend to here and I missed the segment after the dr's  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:51:57 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.

I agree BT and Grande - something happened at the rocks and Arashi beach.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 09:52:15 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: BTgirl on June 03, 2007, 09:52:17 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Will someone please remind me what Dr. Hodges first name is? TY


Andrew


Thanks, Red. I'd like to try to read some more about him and his ideas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:52:45 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


Even so the wording means that whoever drafted the email are just as guilty which would fit with our understanding of the 4 involved IMO

Absolutely true


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 09:53:10 PM
Let see where to start i don't even know where to begin these last days where so crazy for me i'm very tired haven't slept good in days


of couse you dont know where to start, thats because you have told so many lies its ridiculous

of course youre tired you pathetic loser. you cant sleep because you know you are a killer


of course its crazy.. because what you did was crazy



have not slept in days because your  GUILTY and evn you can not beleive what you have done



ROBOTS THOUGHTS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 09:54:58 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


I thought it was very interesting.  I'm not sure about his new "science" but it was interesting.  The most interesting thing is that he used to communicate with Dan Rhiel and he survived that. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 09:55:16 PM
Not positive on this but it seems like one of our Monkeys either knows Dr. Hodges or has met him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:55:40 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


 OMG..  Heavens NO..  Not offended here at all.  Glad you gave him the time to speak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 09:56:15 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


I thought it was very interesting.  I'm not sure about his new "science" but it was interesting.  The most interesting thing is that he used to communicate with Dan Rhiel and he survived that. lol


 :shock:  :D  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 09:56:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


Meant to comment on this also.  8)
The mentioning of enclosed spaces -a room in a hotel etc., is symbolic of containment.  Of being inside a closed area or container.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 09:58:24 PM
Quote from: "robots"
she is in something

but i still say LAND

and i still say ABANDONED septic tank

easy to open, its quick and easily hidden

robots I agree with you that she is on land.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 09:58:44 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


Meant to comment on this also.  8)
The mentioning of enclosed spaces -a room in a hotel etc., is symbolic of containment.  Of being inside a closed area or container.

Yes, I understand what he was saying but it seems far too interpretive for my logical brain.  I feel as though you could take almost any conversation and find containers in it.

I'm not doubting that there's a good possibility that Natalee was put in a container, just his methods of arriving at that conclusion.  

Does that make sense?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 09:59:44 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I was lost on his "container" profiling but I agree about Joran.  I also agree it's most likely she is in the ocean now.

As far as the Deepak emails go, I do believe Deepak sent them.  The body of the email itself was most likely drafted by either Paul or Joran van der Sloot, IMO.


Meant to comment on this also.  8)
The mentioning of enclosed spaces -a room in a hotel etc., is symbolic of containment.  Of being inside a closed area or container.


 I was having a hard time understanding that too. and missed alot.. and hope Tyler did a better job. I have not read her post yet...
bad enough I typo.. and hard to post something That sounded confusing.. LOL

 RED has a point.. anyone can go on a PC and pretend to be anyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 10:00:35 PM
I think it is harder for us to grasp as we (I) am not a psychiatrist or psychologist. But it makes sense to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 10:01:40 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


Dana even though I had to rely on Tyler and Angie transcribing, It sounded like a very good program.I imagine it was insulting to him to be on the H and C program and not allowed time to speak.

Also like I keep repeating I think our speculating here for the past 2 years is also because we have also been reading between the lines on all of the stories.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 10:02:26 PM
Now you guys know why I was so confused...(throwing hands up in frustration)...I couldn't make heads or tails out of some of his reasoning.  I know what we all think and what he says is pretty much close to that too...we just arrived at that conclusion in various ways...none of which were considered "thought imprinting".

I give up trying to explain it...I think I would rather tango...at least I can understand my confusion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tiger on June 03, 2007, 10:02:32 PM
Great show Dana and Red.A very astute man,with knowledge and some good points.Seemed to make good points and to know what he was talking about.it is up to Tim and the Dutch to prosecute the case


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 10:02:36 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


Certainly not offended here.  It was a great opportunity to hear what he actually had to say instead of that laughable appearance on H&C.  I think he has a few good points and an interesting way of reaching his conclusions.  We are pleased to have the chance to hear these guests uninterrupted by meaningless babble which they get subjected to on MSM.. We are fans of Dana!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 10:05:41 PM
In an early interview I remember with  Clint Vanzandt , after he had interviewed Deepak (in the Cyberzone?) I remember  being fairly shocked when his statements seemed to indicate  that he felt Deepak was not directly involved(?) and that he felt he was just a "scared kid". :shock: This was early though, maybe he changed his idea about that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 10:06:23 PM
I recall Dr. Hodges and his analysis from at least a year and half ago.
He has been saying this for a long time.

Must have been on RWV but Easy posted one of the first things I saw about him yesterday.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:07:31 PM
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 10:08:41 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Lala'sMom on June 03, 2007, 10:08:57 PM
Dana
That was a great show.  I am still working on the thought prints.  I can see how they could be used.  The human mind is very astute and I think within each of us is a desire to be good.  I think there is a genetic imprint that each of us carries that results in our conscience.  Some of us are more keenly aware of it than others.  Still I find his entire theory interesting.  I am glad you had him on...I would say have him on again and ask him about some of Paulus statements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 10:09:08 PM
Angie maybe it was that Indian lady with the  Michigan area code again

 :lol:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:09:25 PM
From RWV:

New Analysis Suggests Gang Rape And Drugging Involved In Holloway Disappearance

Dr. Andrew Hodges, a forensic psychiatrist, has begun to analyze some of what documented facts and statements are available in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway - that analysis suggests that both Deepak Kalpoe and Joran Van der Sloot may have been involved in a planned scheme which included the drugging and gang raping of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway. He is currently preparing a full report for the family of Natalee Holloway.

Thoughtprint decoding is reading between the lines for unconscious messages, called "thoughtprints,".

A recent breakthrough to the unconscious mind reveals it is strikingly honest and far brighter than the conscious mind and that criminals are strongly inclined toward unconscious confession.

To decode thoughtprints one must be attuned to a suspect's unconsciously patterned ideas and not his literal conscious statements. The conscious mind speaks literally ("left brain") about certain issues, the unconscious mind speaks symbolically ("right brain") about deeper issues facts via thoughtprints.

Thoughtprints: Joran indirectly warned the girls from Mountain Brook High School including Natalee Holloway around 9 pm at the Holiday Inn Casino-- "Don't go to Carlos and Charlies, it's no fun on Sunday night." This suggests an unconscious protective warning, knowing that he was up to something (a group rape as he suggests).

Natalee Drugged: Joran spontaneously reported that Natalee was on drugs at C and C suggesting she indeed was drugged there. Deepak's thoughtprints also suggest Natalee had been drugged - reporting that he had lied to police because missing girls "usually show up at a crack house (sic)."

Both suspects independently introduced drugs's suggesting they drugged her in addition to the alcohol she had consumed. There are rumors of bartenders cooperating in such a scenario.

Natalee Resisted a Group Rape: Joran and Deepak both referenced the idea of sex being refused ("Joran said he refused Natalee sex in the back seat at one point, Deepak prohibited Joran and Natalee from sexual contact telling them to go get a hotel room) and of Natalee refusing to be touched while on the ground when she fell.

All of this strongly suggests sexual activity and touch being refused and that she put up a fight while held down and that there was both verbal and physical resistance.

A particularly striking story of Natalee falling-- physically out of control on the ground and intoxicated linked with the moment of separation (death)-- suggests loss of control through drugs, rape and finally through death.

Additional analysis, some anticipated to be discussed this week on Court TV with more going directly to the family, is pending. In speaking with Dr. Hodges, it was at least suggested at this point that, based upon other reports, along with the drugging, such a crime may have included luring Natalee Holloway away from the front of Carlos and Charlie's on foot.

Dr. Hodges "Thought Print" work was involved to some extent in profiling the BTK serial killer. His credentials include being certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. He is a former Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine and received the Outstanding Clinician’s Award in 1995 from the International Society of Communicative Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy. He is also a member of the American Psychiatric Association.

Developing ...

This post is also available at Blogger News Network.

Monday, August 15, 2005 at 03:24 AM in Natalee Holloway | Permalink


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:10:32 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll


 I don't blame yah.. I won't answer blocked calls myself when I get them.
 great show!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 10:10:37 PM
Here is the Dr. Hodges/ Tim Miller interview.

    http://tinyurl.com/yqnu6c


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 10:10:43 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll


Or a telemarketer?   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 10:12:00 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
she is in something

but i still say LAND

and i still say ABANDONED septic tank

easy to open, its quick and easily hidden

robots I agree with you that she is on land.



 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 10:12:32 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll


Or a telemarketer?   :lol:  :lol:


yah that too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 10:12:32 PM
Great show Dana. Really enjoyed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 10:13:01 PM
There you go, Klaas!

I knew I had seen him before and that he was saying this same thing from the get go.

This is not something he just came up with at this late date.

He had the credentials or I would not give him so much credibility.
I do think HE believes HIS theory at least.

Not sure if I do but I think there is a little something to it and he has tried to refine what we all do all the time.  

He has TAKEN IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL as some one said they couldn't stand that phrase, lol.
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 10:13:58 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
There you go, Klaas!

I knew I had seen him before and that he was saying this same thing from the get go.

This is not something he just came up with at this late date.

He had the credentials or I would not give him so much credibility.
I do think HE believes HIS theory at least.

Not sure if I do but I think there is a little something to it and he has tried to refine what we all do all the time.  

He has TAKEN IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL as some one said they couldn't stand that phrase, lol.
.


well said


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 03, 2007, 10:14:00 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll
Once again great show Dana!.........Hello Monkeys! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 10:14:21 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll
Once again great show Dana!.........Hello Monkeys! :D


thank you all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 10:15:06 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
she is in something

but i still say LAND

and i still say ABANDONED septic tank

easy to open, its quick and easily hidden

robots I agree with you that she is on land.


Hi San, Nice to see you.

Ok if we are speculating on land. How about this? In the very early days there were 2 things that happened. No links, sorry. Maybe Klaas has them.
One was a ? cartoon about Natalee at the Holiday Inn showing a ? burial place.
Two was a witness saying he saw a Body being transported from the Holiday Inn. Wrapped in something but he saw blonde hair. The naysayers said it was a dead plant or tree.

What if it was a dead tree? What if where the tree was removed was where Natalee was buried?  Add another tree to replace the one removed.
Now remember this is speculation.

One other thing I want to bring up while I am here. I notice when we travel there are always advertisements along the roads for Lions Dens. They are adult porn places. I believe.Nothing whatsoever to do with the Lions Club.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:15:09 PM
A post under the Hodges story from RWV:

Of course someone with some actual credentials posts something that MORE THAN LIKELY happened and the Joran, Kalpoe supporters/Beth and Natalee bashers claim he's a quack.

Mary - my father is a retired homicide detective and he said the same exact thing you posted above. Isn't it amazing how the majority of people who actually have some experience in what is going on in Aruba basically same the same thing, explain the same exact scenario as to probably what most likely happened? Mark Furhman said the same exact thing about a week or so ago. Then you have these people who claim there is some sordid underworld in Aruba that involves politicians, police personnel, etc, that Natalee was kidnapped by these people for political reasons and sold into slavery and somehow Joran and the Kalpoe brothers are not involved? Come on....People need to wake up and smell the coffee grinds.

This guy hit it right on. I've been on here saying this is exactly what happened from the get go. It's nothing more sinister that a rape or a sexually advance that was unwarranted by Natalee that eventually resulted in her death.

Joran and Kalpoe apologists DO NOT want to believe this is what happened because deep down in their hearts THEY KNOW this what more than likely happened.

If I put odds on the different possible scenarios that happened this would be the "chalk", the favorite, at odds of 2-1 or less.


Posted by: Kap | Monday, August 15, 2005 at 08:03 AM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:15:39 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Anna"
There you go, Klaas!

I knew I had seen him before and that he was saying this same thing from the get go.

This is not something he just came up with at this late date.

He had the credentials or I would not give him so much credibility.
I do think HE believes HIS theory at least.

Not sure if I do but I think there is a little something to it and he has tried to refine what we all do all the time.  

He has TAKEN IT TO THE NEXT LEVEL as some one said they couldn't stand that phrase, lol.
.


well said


 I never heard of him until recently   :oops:  I hardly ever read RWV way back when.  SO this is all new to me..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 03, 2007, 10:15:43 PM
Does anyone know why the Worldjournier Natalee Timeline is down? I can't get to it.  TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 03, 2007, 10:15:56 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 10:16:52 PM
Hi Elaine.
Dana does put on a great show with interesting guests, real music and a respectful style of interviewing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:16:57 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll
Once again great show Dana!.........Hello Monkeys! :D


 Hi yah neighbor  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 03, 2007, 10:18:14 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll


Or a telemarketer?   :lol:  :lol:
Or Medley Relay wanting to know about the reward again...oh Gawd that woman drives me nutz!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:18:37 PM
Good show Dana!

We don't all have to agree with a guest to enjoy the interview and maybe get some insight into how some people think.  I would like to hear an interview with a sane person that has a different opinion about this case.  Can't think of what sane person that would be though....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 10:19:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From RWV:

New Analysis Suggests Gang Rape And Drugging Involved In Holloway Disappearance

Dr. Andrew Hodges, a forensic psychiatrist, has begun to analyze some of what documented facts and statements are available in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway - that analysis suggests that both Deepak Kalpoe and Joran Van der Sloot may have been involved in a planned scheme which included the drugging and gang raping of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway. He is currently preparing a full report for the family of Natalee Holloway.

Thoughtprint decoding is reading between the lines for unconscious messages, called "thoughtprints,".

A recent breakthrough to the unconscious mind reveals it is strikingly honest and far brighter than the conscious mind and that criminals are strongly inclined toward unconscious confession.

To decode thoughtprints one must be attuned to a suspect's unconsciously patterned ideas and not his literal conscious statements. The conscious mind speaks literally ("left brain") about certain issues, the unconscious mind speaks symbolically ("right brain") about deeper issues facts via thoughtprints.

Thoughtprints: Joran indirectly warned the girls from Mountain Brook High School including Natalee Holloway around 9 pm at the Holiday Inn Casino-- "Don't go to Carlos and Charlies, it's no fun on Sunday night." This suggests an unconscious protective warning, knowing that he was up to something (a group rape as he suggests).

Natalee Drugged: Joran spontaneously reported that Natalee was on drugs at C and C suggesting she indeed was drugged there. Deepak's thoughtprints also suggest Natalee had been drugged - reporting that he had lied to police because missing girls "usually show up at a crack house (sic)."

Both suspects independently introduced drugs's suggesting they drugged her in addition to the alcohol she had consumed. There are rumors of bartenders cooperating in such a scenario.

Natalee Resisted a Group Rape: Joran and Deepak both referenced the idea of sex being refused ("Joran said he refused Natalee sex in the back seat at one point, Deepak prohibited Joran and Natalee from sexual contact telling them to go get a hotel room) and of Natalee refusing to be touched while on the ground when she fell.

All of this strongly suggests sexual activity and touch being refused and that she put up a fight while held down and that there was both verbal and physical resistance.

A particularly striking story of Natalee falling-- physically out of control on the ground and intoxicated linked with the moment of separation (death)-- suggests loss of control through drugs, rape and finally through death.

Additional analysis, some anticipated to be discussed this week on Court TV with more going directly to the family, is pending. In speaking with Dr. Hodges, it was at least suggested at this point that, based upon other reports, along with the drugging, such a crime may have included luring Natalee Holloway away from the front of Carlos and Charlie's on foot.

Dr. Hodges "Thought Print" work was involved to some extent in profiling the BTK serial killer. His credentials include being certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. He is a former Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine and received the Outstanding Clinician’s Award in 1995 from the International Society of Communicative Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy. He is also a member of the American Psychiatric Association.

Developing ...

This post is also available at Blogger News Network.

Monday, August 15, 2005 at 03:24 AM in Natalee Holloway | Permalink




So this would indicate this was his impression about 2.5 months into the investigation and he has not changed on it.

I tend to think a container still on land and would not rule out the abandoned cesspool at the  Sloots or a crypt but I do not think Natalee is buried in the open in soil for example.

If deep water, I do hope there are remains at this late date.  Tim Miller once said it could cost $100K so I hope it is not going to be that expensive or they will spend all their money on this one search.  I hope they get donations to cover and replace some of the expense.

But this is the only way we will ever know.  I hope they also look in that area the remote viewer and somebody else suggested, two with same idea of looking near the refinery.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: robots on June 03, 2007, 10:19:56 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 03, 2007, 10:20:39 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
:shock:  Wonder whos call Dana wouldnt take?
  A troll maybe????


yup i dont take blocked id numbers usually a troll
Once again great show Dana!.........Hello Monkeys! :D


 Hi yah neighbor  :wink:
Hi Angie! :) .... and Tibro over there in Australia  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 10:22:14 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Good show Dana!

We don't all have to agree with a guest to enjoy the interview and maybe get some insight into how some people think.  I would like to hear an interview with a sane person that has a different opinion about this case.  Can't think of what sane person that would be though....


The only persons with different opinions about this case would be the demented souls at FOB and RU


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:23:37 PM
Anyone with a few thousand functioning brain cells all comes to the same conclusion.

It's JP2K and the Aruban Authorities. Now when the heck is someone gonna do something about it?

I'm more pissed off that no one is doing anything than anything else. What Gives?

Off With their HEADS!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 10:24:54 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happened at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


Nice to see you, Shell,

I do believe to the sexually immature, it does as does defecation.  In other words, children tend to associate the two things.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:27:12 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Anyone with a few thousand functioning brain cells all comes to the same conclusion.

It's JP2K and the Aruban Authorities. Now when the heck is someone gonna do something about it?

I'm more pissed off that no one is doing anything than anything else. What Gives?

Off With their HEADS!!!!


Upper and lowers..  where is Lorenna Bobbit when you need her?
 IMO the only hope there is.. is Tim Miller at this point and his search of the waters.   Thats just how I feel.. have the last week or so..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 03, 2007, 10:28:22 PM
3 boys show up 30 minutes before closing time at a bar where a young lady takes a ride home with them and never shows up and is never seen again.

Papa is a judge

We are not stuck on stupid, nor are the powers that be in Aruba. They knew exactly what they were doing.

(Sorry, but when the thought of what happened to dear, sweet Natalee enters my mind, I tend to get enraged all over again)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:28:54 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Good show Dana!

We don't all have to agree with a guest to enjoy the interview and maybe get some insight into how some people think.  I would like to hear an interview with a sane person that has a different opinion about this case.  Can't think of what sane person that would be though....


The only persons with different opinions about this case would be the demented souls at FOB and RU


I can't even think of a credible person that could put forth a good argument on behalf of the trio.  Those people at FOB and RU are so nutty that nothing they say even makes sense.

This is a simple, obvious crime with a very complex clean-up and cover-up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 10:29:05 PM
Well, the interview was pretty good.  I still think they should be looking in the quarry in Moko  (container within a container) instead of the ocean.  This search was never completed and the location is close to Joran's house.  It's more secluded than a beach or boat launch.

I liked the way this guy thinks. Thanks, Dana, for having him on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:29:54 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happened at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


Nice to see you, Shell,

I do believe to the sexually immature, it does as does defecation.  In other words, children tend to associate the two things.

.


 I am  lost  :oops:  So taking a pee and a crap.. to some.. they associate that with sex?  Call me dumb.. but I dont get it..  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Dana on June 03, 2007, 10:30:18 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Good show Dana!

We don't all have to agree with a guest to enjoy the interview and maybe get some insight into how some people think.  I would like to hear an interview with a sane person that has a different opinion about this case.  Can't think of what sane person that would be though....


The only persons with different opinions about this case would be the demented souls at FOB and RU


I can't even think of a credible person that could put forth a good argument on behalf of the trio.  Those people at FOB and RU are so nutty that nothing they say even makes sense.

This is a simple, obvious crime with a very complex clean-up and cover-up.


very very true


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:32:03 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Rob"
Anyone with a few thousand functioning brain cells all comes to the same conclusion.

It's JP2K and the Aruban Authorities. Now when the heck is someone gonna do something about it?

I'm more pissed off that no one is doing anything than anything else. What Gives?

Off With their HEADS!!!!


Upper and lowers..  where is Lorenna Bobbit when you need her?
 IMO the only hope there is.. is Tim Miller at this point and his search of the waters.   Thats just how I feel.. have the last week or so..


That would be the ultimate breakthrough for this case.  I'm just not very optimistic about this being solved without physical evidence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 03, 2007, 10:32:20 PM
(((Thanks Anna, for saying "nice to see you"))) I am here every day, just not always signing in :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 10:32:47 PM
This seems to be Dr. Hodges take on the Ramsey case/ ransom note. I haven't actually read his book, but I think the title pretty much tells us Dr. Hodges take on the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. Hodges, Andrew G. A Mother Gone Bad: The Hidden Confession of JonBenét’s Killer

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/cases/jonBenet.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: San on June 03, 2007, 10:33:12 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
she is in something

but i still say LAND

and i still say ABANDONED septic tank

easy to open, its quick and easily hidden

robots I agree with you that she is on land.


Hi San, Nice to see you.

Ok if we are speculating on land. How about this? In the very early days there were 2 things that happened. No links, sorry. Maybe Klaas has them.
One was a ? cartoon about Natalee at the Holiday Inn showing a ? burial place.
Two was a witness saying he saw a Body being transported from the Holiday Inn. Wrapped in something but he saw blonde hair. The naysayers said it was a dead plant or tree.

What if it was a dead tree? What if where the tree was removed was where Natalee was buried?  Add another tree to replace the one removed.
Now remember this is speculation.


One other thing I want to bring up while I am here. I notice when we travel there are always advertisements along the roads for Lions Dens. They are adult porn places. I believe.Nothing whatsoever to do with the Lions Club.


Hi Sam,

What if the tree was removed from the Sloot yard.

They still have not dug up the pool and until they do I am not satisfied.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 10:33:23 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:33:48 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Rob"
Anyone with a few thousand functioning brain cells all comes to the same conclusion.

It's JP2K and the Aruban Authorities. Now when the heck is someone gonna do something about it?

I'm more pissed off that no one is doing anything than anything else. What Gives?

Off With their HEADS!!!!


Upper and lowers..  where is Lorenna Bobbit when you need her?
 IMO the only hope there is.. is Tim Miller at this point and his search of the waters.   Thats just how I feel.. have the last week or so..


That would be the ultimate breakthrough for this case.  I'm just not very optimistic about this being solved without physical evidence.


 Mike .. I hear yah.  My prayers are with Tim and TES..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: LilPuma on June 03, 2007, 10:34:25 PM
Great show, Dana.  Stephanie was great and Dr. Hodges was very interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 10:36:16 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Does anyone know why the Worldjournier Natalee Timeline is down? I can't get to it.  TIA


Is this it Elaine?

http://tinyurl.com/39zppz


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: LilPuma on June 03, 2007, 10:36:34 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
This seems to be Dr. Hodges take on the Ramsey case/ ransom note. I haven't actually read his book, but I think the title pretty much tells us Dr. Hodges take on the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. Hodges, Andrew G. A Mother Gone Bad: The Hidden Confession of JonBenét’s Killer

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/cases/jonBenet.html


A handwriting analyst on one of the news shows said that the note was written by the mother.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Kat_Gram on June 03, 2007, 10:39:12 PM
I also remember seeing this over at RWV.
The man has more credentials than I do.
I went out and will listen tomorrow to the podcast.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:39:51 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 10:41:01 PM
Welcome to our new monkey Destiny.
Glad you are one of the monkeys that are going to talk to us. So many join but then do not post.

I wish Anna would get dressed again - I miss the outfits.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:41:30 PM
Guys, that bloody substance was not on the rocks before 6-5-2005. I know I have all the info on this Rocks thing. There is only one way that the rocks have anything to do with Natalee is if she was in a freezer, per Deepak key to auxiliary kitchen, and Natalee was frozen and then taken to the rocks on 6-9 / 6-10 2005 and then disposed of there... otherwise there is no chance.

I don't know what happened at that rock area still to this day and I have seen more video than anyone. It is still not clear what exactly happened there. It needs to be answered one way or the other.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 03, 2007, 10:41:30 PM
Easy, do you mean various dna?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: LilPuma on June 03, 2007, 10:42:32 PM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Good show Dana!

We don't all have to agree with a guest to enjoy the interview and maybe get some insight into how some people think.  I would like to hear an interview with a sane person that has a different opinion about this case.  Can't think of what sane person that would be though....


The only persons with different opinions about this case would be the demented souls at FOB and RU


They have souls?   :shock:

RED!!!!  TURN ON FOX THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT PARIS!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:44:12 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Guys, that bloody substance was not on the rocks before 6-5-2005. I know I have all the info on this Rocks thing. There is only one way that the rocks have anything to do with Natalee is if she was in a freezer, per Deepak key to auxiliary kitchen, and Natalee was frozen and then taken to the rocks on 6-9 / 6-10 2005 and then disposed of there... otherwise there is no chance.

I don't know what happened at that rock area still to this day and I have seen more video than anyone. It is still not clear what exactly happened there. It needs to be answered one way or the other.

How do you know the bloody substance was not on the rocks prior to 6/5?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 10:44:53 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 10:45:44 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
This seems to be Dr. Hodges take on the Ramsey case/ ransom note. I haven't actually read his book, but I think the title pretty much tells us Dr. Hodges take on the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. Hodges, Andrew G. A Mother Gone Bad: The Hidden Confession of JonBenét’s Killer

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/cases/jonBenet.html


A handwriting analyst on one of the news shows said that the note was written by the mother.


There has been alot of controversey about this, and it has always been felt that there are similarities between Patsy Ramsey's writing, and whomever actually wrote it.  Some handwriting analyst might agree....others not. I personally don't think she had anything to do with the murder or the note, and much can be found in the media to corroborate this. Sorry. didn't mean to change the topic .

+++++++++++++++++++++++

 GRACE: Joining us now, Andrew Hodges, psychiatrist and author. Dr. Hodges, thank you for being with us. You have very carefully taken a look at this book, actually written -- a look at the case and actually written a book, "A Mother Gone Bad: The Hidden Confession of JonBenet`s Killer," "Who Will Speak for JonBenet?" Do you support the intruder theory that John San Agustin does?

ANDREW HODGES, PSYCHIATRIST: Not at all, Nancy. I think this -- you know, I think the ransom note is the key to the case. That`s where I came in as a clinician, a psychiatrist with 30 years` experience. And I applied a breakthrough to the unconscious mind.

This case comes down to how the mind works. This letter is written on two levels: the conscious level and the unconscious level. This reflects an unconscious confession. In the unconscious mind, you know, police use the unconscious mind at crime scenes to hypnotize witnesses and pick up additional information...

(CROSSTALK)

GRACE: What does the letter tell you about the killer?

HODGES: OK. Understand that (INAUDIBLE) mind speaks in a coded language by patterning similar ideas called thought prints. I see in there a cancer code. I see in there a code of sexual molestation. I see in there a code that this was a staged crime scene. I see in there a code that JonBenet was dead before the ransom note was written.

We sent Boulder an 80-page report, 14 conclusions, that this was a female cancer victim who wrote this letter and that she was picking -- she was triggered by picking up on a sexual assault where she witnessed JonBenet being sexually assaulted, and that`s what set her off.

So all this fit the Ramseys to a T, and the ransom note is a story. If you look at the signature, you`ll see "Victory." And the "ctory" is spaced apart, suggests story. The whole thing is a hidden story of the ransom, of the crime.

http://tinyurl.com/2tbupy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 03, 2007, 10:45:49 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Good show Dana!

We don't all have to agree with a guest to enjoy the interview and maybe get some insight into how some people think.  I would like to hear an interview with a sane person that has a different opinion about this case.  Can't think of what sane person that would be though....


The only persons with different opinions about this case would be the demented souls at FOB and RU


They have souls?   :shock:

RED!!!!  TURN ON FOX THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT PARIS!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Followed by ROSIE!!!!!!   :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 10:46:37 PM
at the risk of being accused of being an idiot, I am going to write two words and most of the men will know what I mean about Deepak and urine.

"Golden rain."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 10:47:06 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


He did say in one of his suspect statments that he and Satish to a yard to go when leaving C+C's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Elaine on June 03, 2007, 10:48:27 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Elaine"
Does anyone know why the Worldjournier Natalee Timeline is down? I can't get to it.  TIA


Is this it Elaine?

http://tinyurl.com/39zppz
Thanks BB, that is certainly the google cache of it, the direct link tells me it's not there ....but yes that's it thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:49:48 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Easy, do you mean various dna?


Yeah, I was just trying to think why he gave those details about that location.  He was either worried that someone might of seen his car there, or he thought he might have left some type of bodily fluids in that location.

Then again, that stop could be a distraction pointing in the opposite direction of another.

Did Satish, or Joran confirm that story about stopping at Arashi?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:50:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
at the risk of being accused of being an idiot, I am going to write two words and most of the men will know what I mean about Deepak and urine.

"Golden rain."


  Glad you said it.. I was being quiet and thoughy of Golden Shower.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:51:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Guys, that bloody substance was not on the rocks before 6-5-2005. I know I have all the info on this Rocks thing. There is only one way that the rocks have anything to do with Natalee is if she was in a freezer, per Deepak key to auxiliary kitchen, and Natalee was frozen and then taken to the rocks on 6-9 / 6-10 2005 and then disposed of there... otherwise there is no chance.

I don't know what happened at that rock area still to this day and I have seen more video than anyone. It is still not clear what exactly happened there. It needs to be answered one way or the other.

How do you know the bloody substance was not on the rocks prior to 6/5?


Because Mr. Holloway told me he searched there multiple times. There was no red substance. ..he would have seen it and so would have his friends.

In a interesting shift. Ed SMIT told me that he saw Dave drive right by him, but it was actually Paul Reynolds in a red jeep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 10:52:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Guys, that bloody substance was not on the rocks before 6-5-2005. I know I have all the info on this Rocks thing. There is only one way that the rocks have anything to do with Natalee is if she was in a freezer, per Deepak key to auxiliary kitchen, and Natalee was frozen and then taken to the rocks on 6-9 / 6-10 2005 and then disposed of there... otherwise there is no chance.

I don't know what happened at that rock area still to this day and I have seen more video than anyone. It is still not clear what exactly happened there. It needs to be answered one way or the other.

How do you know the bloody substance was not on the rocks prior to 6/5?


 yeah? what she said? I was gonna ask too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 10:53:43 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Guys, that bloody substance was not on the rocks before 6-5-2005. I know I have all the info on this Rocks thing. There is only one way that the rocks have anything to do with Natalee is if she was in a freezer, per Deepak key to auxiliary kitchen, and Natalee was frozen and then taken to the rocks on 6-9 / 6-10 2005 and then disposed of there... otherwise there is no chance.

I don't know what happened at that rock area still to this day and I have seen more video than anyone. It is still not clear what exactly happened there. It needs to be answered one way or the other.

How do you know the bloody substance was not on the rocks prior to 6/5?


Because Mr. Holloway told me he searched there multiple times. There was no red substance. ..he would have seen it and so would have his friends.

In a interesting shift. Ed SMIT told me that he saw Dave drive right by him, but it was actually Paul Reynolds in a red jeep.

Rob - there are alot of rocks in that area that look similar.  How does Dave know that he was in that exact spot?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 10:55:42 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


He did say in one of his suspect statments that he and Satish to a yard to go when leaving C+C's


I recall.   The issue is, Deepak claims to have urinated twice from the time they arrived at C&C's to the time they arrived @ Arashi.  Unless Deepak was drinking from the time he got off of work, It would seem very unlikely he had to pee two times within that appx. 1 hour time period.  Again, I think one or both of the statements regarding 'urinating' are alibi's for something else, whether that be DNA as Easy suggested, an attempt to fill the gaps in the timeline, or even a glimpse into the subconcious mind and a sexual assault.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 10:55:46 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


If Deepak had pouring back a bunch of beer he might of had a frequent need to stop and take a leak, but whiskey and coke doesn't do that to a person.

So, the question is why did he even bring up the stop?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 03, 2007, 10:58:00 PM
Dr. Hodges's theories which encompass aspects of the Natalee Holloway case ... mirrors to some extend ... the theories of many.  However ... this guy's "respected" professional expertise in the field of psychiatry commands attention ... provides him with a measure of credibility.  He is not claiming a visionary experience ... he is not putting his theories in a riddle ... he is not claiming a psychic experience.  Most of us Monkeys have come to many of the same conclusions as Dr. Hodges but ... these  conclusion has been arrived at through logic based on research that has been derived through the media ... articles ... documents ...

Think about ... in Dave Holloway book ... Aruba: The Untold Story of Natalee Holloway and Corruption in Paradise .. he acknowledges that "Out of Desperation" (Chapter 3) the family afforded platforms to those whose theories were arrived at through some very unconventional methods and ... then the Appendix of his book was devoted to Shango's Riddle.

Janet

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/contact.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 10:58:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

Rob - there are alot of rocks in that area that look similar.  How does Dave know that he was in that exact spot?


I'm quite sure he is correct and I would be willing to bank that RED is also familiar with this area.

Something happened there, but I'm not sure what. Believe me Klaas, I'm still   not sure what happened down there. Something really bizarre for sure.

You have to know, these people did it all the first 10 days and who knows what is real and not real....that could be a staged event... we don't know for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 10:58:21 PM
I told Satish, "She has had enough...."  What had she had enough of?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 10:59:40 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


If Deepak had pouring back a bunch of beer he might of had a frequent need to stop and take a leak, but whiskey and coke doesn't do that to a person.

So, the question is why did he even bring up the stop?


Good question.  He was there IMO.  I don't recall if Joran and/or Satish backed up the alibi.  I do recall his statement about Arashi was very detailed down to the spot at 'the end of the asphalted area' where he parked.  I posted some images of that precise spot at one point.  I will see if I can find them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:00:10 PM
Take the vide out....she's had enough... "was it a video?"  What did he tell him to take out? She had had enough?  Was it take the belt off, she has had enough?  Or take your organ out of her, she is choking.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:01:52 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Rob - there are alot of rocks in that area that look similar.  How does Dave know that he was in that exact spot?


I'm quite sure he is correct and I would be willing to bank that RED is also familiar with this area.

Something happened there, but I'm not sure what. Believe me Klaas, I'm still   not sure what happened down there. Something really bizarre for sure.

You have to know, these people did it all the first 10 days and who knows what is real and not real....that could be a staged event... we don't know for sure.

Rob - Dave didn't even get to Aruba until June 1 or 2.  There are several rock formations near the Lighthouse.  How would Dave have known back then where to look?  We didn't even know about it then?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 11:02:23 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Shell"
Easy, do you mean various dna?


Yeah, I was just trying to think why he gave those details about that location.  He was either worried that someone might of seen his car there, or he thought he might have left some type of bodily fluids in that location.

Then again, that stop could be a distraction pointing in the opposite direction of another.

Did Satish, or Joran confirm that story about stopping at Arashi?


I wonder if this from Sander Gottenbos statement 6/16/05 should really be interpreted to read  ".....that the girl in the neighborhood of Arashi beach lost consciousness."

 Joran said that they drove in the direction the "Lighthouse" and that the girl in the neighborhood of Arashi fell asleep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:02:33 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Take the vide out....she's had enough... "was it a video?"  What did he tell him to take out? She had had enough?  Was it take the belt off, she has had enough?  Or take your organ out of her, she is choking.

Exactly.  What did she really have enough of.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: bleachedblack on June 03, 2007, 11:03:39 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I told Satish, "She has had enough...."  What had she had enough of?


The porn video the put in the DVD?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:04:05 PM
"We washed the car.  There was a white car."  Some psychiatrists will tell you that people who rape or have been raped, can never get clean enough and wearing white, or talking about white things washes the guilt away, the dirt, the filth.

She said "slaves..."  Sex with a belt is considered "master and slave.."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 11:04:48 PM
In the beginning Deepak's attorney said they made a stop at another bar or a store after leaving CnCs. What did they stop for? Drugs or another pimp?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:05:44 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
While I try to be open to everyone's theories, what I've always come back to thinking is that something happened at the rocks, she died either there or in Deepak's car, and she was put in the ocean in the fish trap.

Dr. Hodges theory doesn't include anything to do with the rocks, but it does make sense to me.


I have always felt that something significant happend at Arashi Beach.  There is no other explanation for Deepak's urinating statementS hence the alibi for being there out of his vehicle.


Is "taking a pee" a sexual innuendo? My guess is yes, but not being a guy, i would not know.


not in my book  8)


That's an interesting thought.  

The urinating alibi could be more of a result of the subconcious memories of having his 'unit' out @ Arashi, if in fact that is the case.  It also provided reasoning for being there.

He also claims to have urinated just 45 minutes earlier @ Carlos n' Charlies.  

Deepak likely retrieved the narcotics while @ C&C's when he claimed to have been urinating.


That is a lot of peeing for a person that was drinking whiskey and coke.  Could be that he wanted to cover in case something of him was found at that location.


Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


If Deepak had pouring back a bunch of beer he might of had a frequent need to stop and take a leak, but whiskey and coke doesn't do that to a person.

So, the question is why did he even bring up the stop?


Good question.  He was there IMO.  I don't recall if Joran and/or Satish backed up the alibi.  I do recall his statement about Arashi was very detailed down to the spot at 'the end of the asphalted area' where he parked.  I posted some images of that precise spot at one point.  I will see if I can find them.


(http://i8.tinypic.com/25h1qhy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:06:14 PM
Was the conversation, Natalee said her mother was Hitler's sister, or did Joran tell her he was Hitler and he was going to make her Hitler's sister...is it not true that Hitler raped his sister?

Let's go to slave.  Did Natalee say that in Alabama they would be slaves, or did they say, "in Alabama Black people are slaves, but tonight, you are going to be our slave... we are in Aruba and we are the masters..."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:08:45 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
[quote="Grande
Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


If Deepak had pouring back a bunch of beer he might of had a frequent need to stop and take a leak, but whiskey and coke doesn't do that to a person.

So, the question is why did he even bring up the stop?[/quote]

Because Deepak lies about the little things, like the security guard lie when he described the uniform and the walkie talkie.  Deepak is not an outrageous liar the way Joran is.  He makes up little lies to make his story sound more plausible.  Like if he is "remembering to tell you the little things he must be telling the truth" type of lying.

Joran, on the other hand, tells BS lies that common sense can easily disspell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:09:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

Rob - Dave didn't even get to Aruba until June 1 or 2.  There are several rock formations near the Lighthouse.  How would Dave have known back then where to look?  We didn't even know about it then?


Klaas- I'm telling you that Dave was there and he didn't see anything that looked like blood. They drove all over that area. ATVs and Quads.

Now maybe the ALE did cover over that crime scene with the dead bodies of people from the morgue at a later time... but who knows. How could anyone ever prove that.

I do know that Dave Holloway and his friends did traverse that entire area and did not see any blood there... those videos would have been shot around 6-9 to 6-10 like Ed said. And before that there was no way there was blood there....

I can't explain it, all I can do it tell you the truth. I have been all over these videos. What more can I say? I looked at the videos and I compared it to what I was told and I came to the conclusions that I have.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:09:37 PM
(http://i14.tinypic.com/4r7wo05.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 11:09:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
at the risk of being accused of being an idiot, I am going to write two words and most of the men will know what I mean about Deepak and urine.

"Golden rain."


Yes, there are those who find urinating on others highly sexual as well as being urinated on, ditto other bodily functions.  Considered kinky by most like S&M, bondage, etc.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:10:37 PM
Not one of us is a doctor so we do not know the condition nor capacity of Deepak's bladder but I suspect he had to throw up after what had happened, and they would find all that "shit..."  He experienced something that made him sick.  Out of fear DNA would be found, he said "urinate..."  vomit is now gone.  Vomit was probably just beer anyway, so DNA is DNA.  Or did they stop at a beach and clean their bodies and throw away something, like a belt?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:12:06 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Rob - Dave didn't even get to Aruba until June 1 or 2.  There are several rock formations near the Lighthouse.  How would Dave have known back then where to look?  We didn't even know about it then?


Klaas- I'm telling you that Dave was there and he didn't see anything that looked like blood. They drove all over that area. ATVs and Quads.

Now maybe the ALE did cover over that crime scene with the dead bodies of people from the morgue at a later time... but who knows. How could anyone ever prove that.

I do know that Dave Holloway and his friends did traverse that entire area and did not see any blood there... those videos would have been shot around 6-9 to 6-10 like Ed said. And before that there was no way there was blood there....

I can't explain it, all I can do it tell you the truth. I have been all over these videos. What more can I say? I looked at the videos and I compared it to what I was told and I came to the conclusions that I have.


 Is Ed Smit credible in your opinion??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:12:09 PM
(http://i12.tinypic.com/5x5ghz9.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 11:12:19 PM
something I just thought of,when we were in Germany and Amsterdam all the female bathrooms  had condom dispensers. I would imagine the mens would as well.

So Jorans excuse of not having a condom was crap.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:12:40 PM
"No, she was not ugly, she did not look like a whore, she was beautiful and she danced like an angel..."  

Now, he has placed her in Heaven.  It's late now.  It's December.  She has been through purgatory now and escaped the container.  She is an angel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:14:17 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
[quote="Grande
Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


If Deepak had pouring back a bunch of beer he might of had a frequent need to stop and take a leak, but whiskey and coke doesn't do that to a person.

So, the question is why did he even bring up the stop?


Because Deepak lies about the little things, like the security guard lie when he described the uniform and the walkie talkie.  Deepak is not an outrageous liar the way Joran is.  He makes up little lies to make his story sound more plausible.  Like if he is "remembering to tell you the little things he must be telling the truth" type of lying.

Joran, on the other hand, tells BS lies that common sense can easily disspell.[/quote]

Is there a reason he wanted people to think they were at that location?  Does being there prevent them from being elsewhere at a given time?  Did someone see Deepak's car at that location?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:15:02 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 Is Ed Smit credible in your opinion??


No!... hahahaha!!! he's NUTZ!

I laid a web and someone fell right into it. Thanks MB!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:19:51 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Rob - Dave didn't even get to Aruba until June 1 or 2.  There are several rock formations near the Lighthouse.  How would Dave have known back then where to look?  We didn't even know about it then?


Klaas- I'm telling you that Dave was there and he didn't see anything that looked like blood. They drove all over that area. ATVs and Quads.

Now maybe the ALE did cover over that crime scene with the dead bodies of people from the morgue at a later time... but who knows. How could anyone ever prove that.

I do know that Dave Holloway and his friends did traverse that entire area and did not see any blood there... those videos would have been shot around 6-9 to 6-10 like Ed said. And before that there was no way there was blood there....

I can't explain it, all I can do it tell you the truth. I have been all over these videos. What more can I say? I looked at the videos and I compared it to what I was told and I came to the conclusions that I have.


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: yapperz1 on June 03, 2007, 11:20:03 PM
Nite Monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 03, 2007, 11:21:31 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
(http://i14.tinypic.com/4r7wo05.jpg)


Who is speaking in the second paragraph?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:21:39 PM
Nite Yapperz


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 11:23:55 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 Is Ed Smit credible in your opinion??


No!... hahahaha!!! he's NUTZ!

I laid a web and someone fell right into it. Thanks MB!


A little old and slow here, what does that mean Rob?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:24:06 PM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
[quote="Grande
Honestly, I don't think Deepak had the time to drink much if any at all.  He may have taken a 'road soda' for the ride, but time did not allow for much drinking between Joran's and Arashi IMO.


If Deepak had pouring back a bunch of beer he might of had a frequent need to stop and take a leak, but whiskey and coke doesn't do that to a person.

So, the question is why did he even bring up the stop?


Because Deepak lies about the little things, like the security guard lie when he described the uniform and the walkie talkie.  Deepak is not an outrageous liar the way Joran is.  He makes up little lies to make his story sound more plausible.  Like if he is "remembering to tell you the little things he must be telling the truth" type of lying.

Joran, on the other hand, tells BS lies that common sense can easily disspell.


Is there a reason he wanted people to think they were at that location?  Does being there prevent them from being elsewhere at a given time?  Did someone see Deepak's car at that location?[/quote]

All good questions.  If I were to believe they were never there I would assume he is lying to put himself there instead of somewhere else.  If he says he stopped to "take a pee" so that he has a reason for being there then I have to decide how much of what he is saying is a lie.  He was there for the purpose of what...dragging her dead body out to sea?  I can't think of anything they could have done in the short time it would have taken for him to empty his bladder and then leave.  I think he is lying about being there.  It makes the entire lie more believable if he makes up small details.  jmho


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:24:23 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 Is Ed Smit credible in your opinion??


No!... hahahaha!!! he's NUTZ!

I laid a web and someone fell right into it. Thanks MB!



 HUH?  WTF you talkin about?  Who is MB? Sorry I am lost bigtime..
 email me if you dont wanna say here?  
 I am not directing this to you... but now is not the time to play games and its happening too much other places?  
 Can you splain?  Thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:26:31 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
(http://i12.tinypic.com/5x5ghz9.jpg)


Some interesting interrogations occured immediately after this one by Deepak where Deepak showed investigators where he urinated.  Those included were Zuriel Yarzagary (3 statements within 48 hour time period and IMMEDIATELY after this particular statement by Deepak) and Rafael Solognier (CAR SEARCHED??).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:28:29 PM
He puked.  it's that simple.  He wanted to add that he was there in case someone saw him.  He stopped there and puked.  Puked, puked, you know like when you saw someone die it makes you sick at your stomach and you puke.  He cleaned the puke off him and he went home and cleaned the puke out of his car.  He wanted his car to be so clean it would be like the imaginary one, white.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 11:30:33 PM
These suspects seem to think if their details are a little on the salacious side, that some how makes them much more believable.

Joran not having sex because he didn't have a condom.  Deepak and his bladder activities.  Joran and his graphic and lurid details of what was happening in the back seat.

This reminds me of people in the past who have asked the cops to go easy on them because their alibi was that they were with another woman other than their wife and that is the reason they are behaving in a less than honest manner.

This likely makes no sense to anybody else but it is something I have always thought.  For example, Joran would never say the reason they didn't have sex is Natalee didn't want to.  He thinks not having a condom is more believable because is has that factor.  Something potentially embarrassing being used for behaving in an odd manner that appears to be obviously lying.

Not sure how to explain what I am trying to say but someone else may understand despite my inability to articulate what I think about this.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:30:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 11:30:58 PM
Angie and Tyler thanks for trans.

Dana > thanks

The guy was interesting. Somehow i had the feeling i had heard it all before. Oh yeah...right here on SM. We have covered it all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:31:27 PM
Grande,

Do you know which of the three suspects tried to "off himself"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:32:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
He puked.  it's that simple.  He wanted to add that he was there in case someone saw him.  He stopped there and puked.  Puked, puked, you know like when you saw someone die it makes you sick at your stomach and you puke.  He cleaned the puke off him and he went home and cleaned the puke out of his car.  He wanted his car to be so clean it would be like the imaginary one, white.


If that's the case then Natalee would have passed away within minutes of leaving C&C's.  I don't believe that is the case.  FWIW, I believe something happened to Natalee @ Arashi, perhaps on the 'ERECTED' wall as stated by the reporting officers and seen in the image I posted.  This is the point where they panicked & called papa sloot.  JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 11:33:59 PM
HI gang...:smt006

Is it too late to join in...

Thanks to Tylergal and Angie & the rest of the scribes.. and the DANA (I will listen to the podcast later)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:34:04 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


How do you know the STUFF or INCIDENT at the rocks didn't happen until June 9th or so?  It could have happened May 30th, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:34:15 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Angie and Tyler thanks for trans.

Dana > thanks

The guy was interesting. Somehow i had the feeling i had heard it all before. Oh yeah...right here on SM. We have covered it all.


 Hi Igs sweety,..  YW..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Grande,

Do you know which of the three suspects tried to "off himself"?



Stop reading my mind! JK, I have been wondering that myself.  My guess is Satish.  Deepak knew he was 'unstable' imo thereby making every attempt to protect him from day one.   I don't get the feeling Joran or Deepak have the mental capacity or makeup to feel guilt or shame for their actions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:36:19 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
HI gang...:smt006

Is it too late to join in...

Thanks to Tylergal and Angie & the rest of the scribes.. and the DANA (I will listen to the podcast later)

 Howdy Fart..
 I feel like I am in the freaking twilight zone ..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:36:28 PM
<=== not Grande, but it you look at the placement of the suspects. Satish was the only only housed at KIA at the time and that is where the alleged suicide attempt occurred.

Deepak was at Bubali and Joran was at Noord.

That leaves only Satish and it makes sense with him seeing GHOSTS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 11:36:40 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


Rob, I've been lurking for a few minutes so I'm just going to jump in here and ask...how did Ed know to film there the next morning? Was he just riding by and saw some activity and start filming or did something/someone tip him off that something out of the ordinary was happening out at the rocks? TIA!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:38:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

How do you know the STUFF or INCIDENT at the rocks didn't happen until June 9th or so?  It could have happened May 30th, IMO.


and how do you know this?

How did Ed Smit gett there on the night of the crime? HUH?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:39:04 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Grande,

Do you know which of the three suspects tried to "off himself"?



Stop reading my mind! JK, I have been wondering that myself.  My guess is Satish.  Deepak knew he was 'unstable' imo thereby making every attempt to protect him from day one.   I don't get the feeling Joran or Deepak have the mental capacity or makeup to feel guilt or shame for their actions.


 I agree with yah.. Satish.. and IIRC way back when.. it was said that it was someone in one of the certan jail areas. and I think others here.. figured out where the 3 iditos were.,.. and came to the conclusion it was him> I may be wrong.. but also.. wasnt he the one who said he was  haunted? Or saw ghosts?   :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:39:09 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Grande,

Do you know which of the three suspects tried to "off himself"?



Stop reading my mind! JK, I have been wondering that myself.  My guess is Satish.  Deepak knew he was 'unstable' imo thereby making every attempt to protect him from day one.   I don't get the feeling Joran or Deepak have the mental capacity or makeup to feel guilt or shame for their actions.


I agree.  So...I wonder if Hodges has spent any time researching Satish's statements?  If he was indeed there when "sonething bad happened" and he is using the same lies the Deepak probably told him to use, his conscience may reveal more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 11:39:25 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


well I see you did not answer my post.  :wink:
Are you absolutley sure Dave was at the same rocks? also how quick can  someone find the date of the guy who was Supposedly killed by his wife? Columbian necktie style? Could the blood on the rocks be indirectly tied to Natalee? Could they have taken someone out and either beat them or killed them to keep there mouth shut?

Anna
I understood your post perfectly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:39:46 PM
It was with Satish she died.  Deepak and Joran told Satish to take it out the girl had had enough.  She died with Satish raping her or forcing her to perform oral sex and she vomited and he would not take the "video" out and she choked in her own vomit.  Deepak stopped to vomit.  Satish saw her ghost, he saw her dying and choking and tried to kill himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:39:49 PM
Quote from: "mishy"


Rob, I've been lurking for a few minutes so I'm just going to jump in here and ask...how did Ed know to film there the next morning? Was he just riding by and saw some activity and start filming or did something/someone tip him off that something out of the ordinary was happening out at the rocks? TIA!


Mishy I still don't know. I think this new connection with Clyde Burke looks the best so far.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 11:40:40 PM
And i agree with those who say the Deepak E-mail was a combo effort.

All the gambling and A-student crap is straight from Prince Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 11:41:08 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "oldfart"
HI gang...:smt006

Is it too late to join in...

Thanks to Tylergal and Angie & the rest of the scribes.. and the DANA (I will listen to the podcast later)

 Howdy Fart..
 I feel like I am in the freaking twilight zone ..........

Anigie..
You mean  :smt119    :lol:
I had a hard time caching up  cause I had to select the page # greater than the owe I wanted.  Next took me to the latest page.
I figured out why but was going WTH... for a bit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:41:59 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


Rob, I've been lurking for a few minutes so I'm just going to jump in here and ask...how did Ed know to film there the next morning? Was he just riding by and saw some activity and start filming or did something/someone tip him off that something out of the ordinary was happening out at the rocks? TIA!


Probably Simian's source or Simian himself IMO...

Best and only image I can find of Clyde Burke who I suspect to be behind the Simian posts in some fashion;

(http://i18.tinypic.com/6c3cwgi.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:42:25 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"

How do you know the STUFF or INCIDENT at the rocks didn't happen until June 9th or so?  It could have happened May 30th, IMO.


and how do you know this?

How did Ed Smit gett there on the night of the crime? HUH?


huh?

You said the blood (or whatever) got on the rocks June 9th.  I'm saying whatever happened in the rock area could have happened on May 30th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:42:51 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Grande,

Do you know which of the three suspects tried to "off himself"?



Stop reading my mind! JK, I have been wondering that myself.  My guess is Satish.  Deepak knew he was 'unstable' imo thereby making every attempt to protect him from day one.   I don't get the feeling Joran or Deepak have the mental capacity or makeup to feel guilt or shame for their actions.


 I agree with yah.. Satish.. and IIRC way back when.. it was said that it was someone in one of the certan jail areas. and I think others here.. figured out where the 3 iditos were.,.. and came to the conclusion it was him> I may be wrong.. but also.. wasnt he the one who said he was  haunted? Or saw ghosts?   :oops:


Angie,

I had forgotten about the ghosts.  Now there's a guilty conscience for you.  I don't think I even need any special training to figure that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:43:13 PM
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"

How do you know the STUFF or INCIDENT at the rocks didn't happen until June 9th or so?  It could have happened May 30th, IMO.


and how do you know this?

How did Ed Smit gett there on the night of the crime? HUH?



 :oops:  Inquiring minds would like to know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 11:45:07 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
And i agree with those who say the Deepak E-mail was a combo effort.

All the gambling and A-student crap is straight from Prince Joran.


Yes it is.  Hard to believe Joran would use this occasion to try to enhance his own reputation but he has always done just that.  Another sick sick example is his claim he won money back for Natalee when in fact he lost $250 of his own money.

Some of it sounds like Paulus, too.  Deepak may have sent the actual email but the language sounds too refined for him based on the manner in which he gave the Skeeters interview.

That is what concerns me about the Dr Hodges analysis.  What if he is analyzing a group effort instead of the thoughts of just Deepak.

This was their walking script to commit to memory so they would all be pn the same page, literally.  And especially for Satish to commit to memory so he would not botch things up not telling the same story.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:45:38 PM
Quote from: "Sam"

well I see you did not answer my post.  :wink:
Are you absolutley sure Dave was at the same rocks? also how quick can  someone find the date of the guy who was Supposedly killed by his wife? Columbian necktie style? Could the blood on the rocks be indirectly tied to Natalee? Could they have taken someone out and either beat them or killed them to keep there mouth shut?

Anna
I understood your post perfectly.


I believe that guy was found around June 17th.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:46:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"

How do you know the STUFF or INCIDENT at the rocks didn't happen until June 9th or so?  It could have happened May 30th, IMO.


and how do you know this?

How did Ed Smit gett there on the night of the crime? HUH?


huh?

You said the blood (or whatever) got on the rocks June 9th.  I'm saying whatever happened in the rock area could have happened on May 30th.


Klaas, I know for a fact that Dave and his brothers were there on the second and they didn't see anything... so what ever happened, happened after the 6/2 to 6/5 time frame.

Klaas, if it happened on 5-30-2005, they would have seen it.. trust me I'm totally sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:46:25 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "oldfart"
HI gang...:smt006

Is it too late to join in...

Thanks to Tylergal and Angie & the rest of the scribes.. and the DANA (I will listen to the podcast later)

 Howdy Fart..
 I feel like I am in the freaking twilight zone ..........

Anigie..
You mean  :smt119    :lol:
I had a hard time caching up  cause I had to select the page # greater than the owe I wanted.  Next took me to the latest page.
I figured out why but was going WTH... for a bit


   :wink:  Come sit by me... Im lost.. lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:48:02 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


Rob, I've been lurking for a few minutes so I'm just going to jump in here and ask...how did Ed know to film there the next morning? Was he just riding by and saw some activity and start filming or did something/someone tip him off that something out of the ordinary was happening out at the rocks? TIA!


Probably Simian's source or Simian himself IMO...

Best and only image I can find of Clyde Burke who I suspect to be behind the Simian posts in some fashion;

(http://i18.tinypic.com/6c3cwgi.jpg)


ON THE LEFT, sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 11:48:21 PM
Some one reported seeing a car  and something being put in the trunk near the light house.. (sorry that is all I remember)
??  when did this occur
Satish  has had the most closed mouth  and  least visable of everone.
JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:48:41 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Grande,

Do you know which of the three suspects tried to "off himself"?



Stop reading my mind! JK, I have been wondering that myself.  My guess is Satish.  Deepak knew he was 'unstable' imo thereby making every attempt to protect him from day one.   I don't get the feeling Joran or Deepak have the mental capacity or makeup to feel guilt or shame for their actions.


 I agree with yah.. Satish.. and IIRC way back when.. it was said that it was someone in one of the certan jail areas. and I think others here.. figured out where the 3 iditos were.,.. and came to the conclusion it was him> I may be wrong.. but also.. wasnt he the one who said he was  haunted? Or saw ghosts?   :oops:


Angie,

I had forgotten about the ghosts.  Now there's a guilty conscience for you.  I don't think I even need any special training to figure that one.


 Hey there.. I dont recall exactly what happened then.. but do remember mention of a ghost?  Yes .. I agree.. guilty conscience big time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 03, 2007, 11:49:48 PM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Rob"
Quote from: "klaasend"


My point is that Dave didn't know about the rocks or the videos at that time.  He wouldn't have been looking for "dried blood".  There are many rock formations in that area and I don't see how he can say with 100% certainty that he knows there was nothing there.


I think the best thing would be to ask when he is on Dana's show next. I think you will find out that his answers make it even more perplexing... and that is not to take anything away from Dave. All I am saying is it makes it harder to figure out what happened there..Natalee was abducted on Aruba. The stuff on the rocks doesn't happen until around 6-9 midnight or so. And the next morning Ed is filming.

It's confusing, but I think you will find out that Dave did not see any red substance on those rocks.


Rob, I've been lurking for a few minutes so I'm just going to jump in here and ask...how did Ed know to film there the next morning? Was he just riding by and saw some activity and start filming or did something/someone tip him off that something out of the ordinary was happening out at the rocks? TIA!


Probably Simian's source or Simian himself IMO...

Best and only image I can find of Clyde Burke who I suspect to be behind the Simian posts in some fashion;

(http://i18.tinypic.com/6c3cwgi.jpg)


ON THE LEFT, sorry.



Simian Says: June 27th, 2005 at 11:14 am
The road from the boy’s home leads to the dirty water. Look for Noord and look for Moko .
The cowboys feet are wet. They are not quickdraws, they will creep by the inch. It’s deep and wide. The Babylonians need this, before time runs out.
Simian Says: June 27th, 2005 at 11:33 am
Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montańa. Look for Moko. Let your fingers connect the dots.



One straight path to the quarry in Moko.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:50:12 PM
Anita called Julia Renfro as soon as she returned.  Remember Anita is friend's with  Natalie's mother who was there helping out with the Friends of Aruba.  Julia Renfro was a part of that group.  Anita called her not only to pick her brain but to pretend to be concerned, and immediately went into pro-active mode by recruiting Julia Renfro to promote Joran's favorability.  Anita was smart enough to show Julia Renfro how she could lose her job if she did not cooperate because tourism and everything else woud start to unravel like a big ball of twine in a cat house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: mishy on June 03, 2007, 11:50:27 PM
Angie you are so funnY!!

Thanks for addressing my question, Rob and Grande...I'm out!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: igsigs on June 03, 2007, 11:52:17 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
That is what concerns me about the Dr Hodges analysis.  What if he is analyzing a group effort instead of the thoughts of just Deepak.

Good point Anna. Hopefully Hodges is familiar with the circumstances/timing of the e-mail, which he appears to be, and maybe he took that into consideration?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 03, 2007, 11:52:22 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Angie you are so funnY!!

Thanks for addressing my question, Rob and Grande...I'm out!



 Hi Mishy and night to yah..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 03, 2007, 11:52:31 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Sam"

well I see you did not answer my post.  :wink:
Are you absolutley sure Dave was at the same rocks? also how quick can  someone find the date of the guy who was Supposedly killed by his wife? Columbian necktie style? Could the blood on the rocks be indirectly tied to Natalee? Could they have taken someone out and either beat them or killed them to keep there mouth shut?

Anna
I understood your post perfectly.


I believe that guy was found around June 17th.


Thank you for answering Truthseeker. I was beginning to think I was on ignore. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 03, 2007, 11:52:47 PM
Good night, Klaas; good night, Igsigs; good night, Anna; good night, Old Fart.

We will see you in the funny paper.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: sb on June 03, 2007, 11:53:23 PM
Jumping in for just a second tonight...

I have about reached the conclusion that the actions on the beach that were shown in the videos were just a half-hearted re-enactment attempt that was filmed to further the agenda of the people wanting to exonerate the security guards. i am not sure that whole screenplay shows us anything thta constitutes "evidence". Suspicious, yes, it is. But I know what it really tells us.

It has bothered me for a LONG time that that event took place AFTER Beth and Dave were on the island and AFTER some fairly significant searches.

I ACTUALLY did NOT follow the case much in its first few days, because here in Bham the info was somewhat slow to come out. But if I remember, within the June 1-10th timeframe, there were a lot of people checking out beaches- in fact that's the ONLY timeframe where the Arubans appeared to actually care at all about Natalee.  The type of evidence the video could have shown, would have been seen before the video was made.

I know there are those who think she was planted there AFTER the fact, but that would have happened at a time when the beaches and the whole island were seeing the absolute peak of their search activity. I think they would have been caught. Then someone will bring up glenda's frantic van ride tot he courthouse, but still I can't see that that beach activity would have gone unnoticed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 03, 2007, 11:53:34 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Some one reported seeing a car  and something being put in the trunk near the light house.. (sorry that is all I remember)
??  when did this occur
Satish  has had the most closed mouth  and  least visable of everone.
JMO


Rafael Solognier had his car searched according to the discovery request/witness list.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 03, 2007, 11:55:11 PM
SB- the van ride took place on 6-13-2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 03, 2007, 11:56:07 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 03, 2007, 11:56:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Good night, Klaas; good night, Igsigs; good night, Anna; good night, Old Fart.

We will see you in the funny paper.


G'nite Tyler....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 03, 2007, 11:56:48 PM
Sam,
Thanks for understanding my post.  If they claim something sort of embarrassing, it is used as a cover for lying and acting like it or behaving in some manner other than what is normal when telling the truth.

No condom, had to urinate, was out with another woman in my opinion all equal cop outs for people lying to police and trying to cover for it by pretending to be sort of uncomfortable not because they are lying but because of what they are having to say or admit to.  It is a way to account for red blotches all over face, ears aflame and profuse sweating,

LIARS, all of them!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: sb on June 04, 2007, 12:01:28 AM
Yes, the van ride was supposed to have been a diversion. glenda was wanting to get HT family away from the beaches so the "plant" could take place. I guess that is POSSIBLE but it seems not so likely.

Do we have a definitive date when the videos were done?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 04, 2007, 12:01:34 AM
For that matter, how do we know the rock videos were taken after Natalee disappeared?  Could have been from any date.  Could have been January for all we know.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:01:45 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Some one reported seeing a car  and something being put in the trunk near the light house.. (sorry that is all I remember)
??  when did this occur
Satish  has had the most closed mouth  and  least visable of everone.
JMO


Rafael Solognier had his car searched according to the discovery request/witness list.


thanks Grande..  but when did someone see something by the light house( I think)
who the heck is  Rafael Solognier??
Arashi (?) is closer to the light house.. has rocks... has huts..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:02:38 AM
Another cofirmation to me that Simian had a legitimate inside source...

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 3:54 pm"...Based on my knowledge they will be confronted. A set up for the behaviour specialists?"  

SEE JUNE 24 Police Car transcript


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 04, 2007, 12:03:12 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Good night, Klaas; good night, Igsigs; good night, Anna; good night, Old Fart.

We will see you in the funny paper.


G'nite Tyler....


Yes, goodnight Tyler.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 12:03:49 AM
ROB - I'm not doubting what Dave has told you, I'm doubting Dave knows what he's actually saying.

There are several groups of rocks around the Lighthouse area.  How on earth would Dave with 100% certainty have looked at that very same groups of rocks on June 2nd?  Also, if there was blood on those rocks it would not still look red on June 2nd, IMO.  it would most likely be dark brownish.  

It's not like on June 2nd Dave had a map and suggestion to look specifically at THOSE rocks.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/lighthousearuba.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 04, 2007, 12:04:38 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Another cofirmation to me that Simian had a legitimate inside source...

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 3:54 pm"...Based on my knowledge they will be confronted. A set up for the behaviour specialists?"  

SEE JUNE 24 Police Car transcript


And here's another example.  Note the length of time between the two posts.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:17 am
Waiting for a call…
 
Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:05:54 AM
Anna
Good to see you here...


Title: Goodnight monkey Pals
Post by: Destiny on June 04, 2007, 12:06:29 AM
Thanks for all your kind welcomes...off to bedy-bye.

C-YA tomorrow

Destiny


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 12:07:20 AM
Nite Destiny


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:07:42 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Some one reported seeing a car  and something being put in the trunk near the light house.. (sorry that is all I remember)
??  when did this occur
Satish  has had the most closed mouth  and  least visable of everone.
JMO


Rafael Solognier had his car searched according to the discovery request/witness list.


thanks Grande..  but when did someone see something by the light house( I think)
who the heck is  Rafael Solognier??
Arashi (?) is closer to the light house.. has rocks... has huts..


Not sure about the lighthouse witness...

There are a few perculiar names on that new list, Rafael Solognier's being one of them.  The record indicates his car was searched, which raises all sorts of questions for me, none of which have been addressed.  

There are alot of entries on that list that need to be addressed in my opinion.


Title: Re: Goodnight monkey Pals
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:09:53 AM
Quote from: "Destiny"
Thanks for all your kind welcomes...off to bedy-bye.

C-YA tomorrow

Destiny


Gee I did not see Destiny in the cage  :shock:  :oops:
 :oops: G'nite...  & nice to almost meet you


Title: Re: Goodnight monkey Pals
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:10:20 AM
Quote from: "Destiny"
Thanks for all your kind welcomes...off to bedy-bye.

C-YA tomorrow

Destiny


  Good night and sweet dreams to yah


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Sam on June 04, 2007, 12:10:24 AM
Good Night Monkeys.

 Interesting conversations taking place tonight. So Danas show and Andrew Hodges did make us put our thinking caps on.

Yes Anna Liars all of them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 04, 2007, 12:11:20 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Take the vide out....she's had enough... "was it a video?"  What did he tell him to take out? She had had enough?  Was it take the belt off, she has had enough?  Or take your organ out of her, she is choking.


eeks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:12:30 AM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"
Another cofirmation to me that Simian had a legitimate inside source...

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 3:54 pm"...Based on my knowledge they will be confronted. A set up for the behaviour specialists?"  

SEE JUNE 24 Police Car transcript


And here's another example.  Note the length of time between the two posts.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:17 am
Waiting for a call…
 
Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.


Im glad your with me on this.  Given what we know about Simian and the accuracy we should re examine every last word.  I have been doing just that and then cross referencing the posts with the timeline of events and the witness list.  I have an update with the new entries, if you want it email me.  If someone would like to assist me with this, please email me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:12:52 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Not sure about the lighthouse witness...

There are a few perculiar names on that new list, Rafael Solognier's being one of them.  The record indicates his car was searched, which raises all sorts of questions for me, none of which have been addressed.  

There are alot of entries on that list that need to be addressed in my opinion.

Grande
I agree 200%  who are some of these people...
Great Job on the spread sheet!!!
I just wonder wahtis missing ? That is to say it did not (?) relate the the Dr. Phil case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: sb on June 04, 2007, 12:13:24 AM
I also think there's a story behind that discovery list. There are people on there we haven't heard about. What role they may play in all this...

This whole thing to me has been like a jigsaw puzzle with several pieces missing- can't quite get it finished.

Whew, tired tionight... monkey bunkey time is gonna be early this evening... se y'all tomorrow PM!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 12:14:54 AM
Nite SB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 04, 2007, 12:14:59 AM
Quote from: "Sam"
Good Night Monkeys.

 Interesting conversations taking place tonight. So Danas show and Andrew Hodges did make us put our thinking caps on.

Yes Anna Liars all of them.


The way I see it is, that interview confirmed/mirrored what we have been thinking and saying all along.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 04, 2007, 12:16:18 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Anna
Good to see you here...


Thank you, Old Fart.

Here is a present for you,

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Avatars/thOldFart-1-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 04, 2007, 12:16:37 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"
Another cofirmation to me that Simian had a legitimate inside source...

Simian Says: June 24th, 2005 at 3:54 pm"...Based on my knowledge they will be confronted. A set up for the behaviour specialists?"  

SEE JUNE 24 Police Car transcript


And here's another example.  Note the length of time between the two posts.

Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 11:17 am
Waiting for a call…
 
Simian Says: June 23rd, 2005 at 2:30 pm
Paulus has been picked up.


Im glad your with me on this.  Given what we know about Simian and the accuracy we should re examine every last word.  I have been doing just that and then cross referencing the posts with the timeline of events and the witness list.  I have an update with the new entries, if you want it email me.  If someone would like to assist me with this, please email me.


Count me in.  I don't have your email.

I do have all of the Simian and Shango posts.  I have always thought Simian had an 'in' somewhere, but until I read some the posts you guys were posting recently I always thought of Simian as a media contact.  I did not occur to me that Simian could have been truly on the inside of the investigation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:16:46 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Grande"
Not sure about the lighthouse witness...

There are a few perculiar names on that new list, Rafael Solognier's being one of them.  The record indicates his car was searched, which raises all sorts of questions for me, none of which have been addressed.  

There are alot of entries on that list that need to be addressed in my opinion.

Grande
I agree 200%  who are some of these people...
Great Job on the spread sheet!!!
I just wonder wahtis missing ? That is to say it did not (?) relate the the Dr. Phil case.


The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:19:00 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Anna
Good to see you here...


Thank you, Old Fart.

Here is a present for you,

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Avatars/thOldFart-1-1.gif)


thanks Anna :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 04, 2007, 12:19:01 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Some one reported seeing a car  and something being put in the trunk near the light house.. (sorry that is all I remember)
??  when did this occur
Satish  has had the most closed mouth  and  least visable of everone.
JMO


Rafael Solognier had his car searched according to the discovery request/witness list.


Satish is the "weak link"....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:19:28 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Anna
Good to see you here...


Thank you, Old Fart.

Here is a present for you,

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Avatars/thOldFart-1-1.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  Anna.. hope all is well with yah chicky!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 04, 2007, 12:21:47 AM
Thank you, Angie.

You and I both had a rough time last week.

Let's hope the coming week is better for us both and also something forthicoming in this investigation.

We are fast approaching the anniversary of the arrest of the J2k and I can't believe we are right where we started.

It just doesn't seem to matter what the actual evidence is, nothing is ever done no matter what.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 04, 2007, 12:21:54 AM
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 04, 2007, 12:22:17 AM
Quote from: "Grande"

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Whoa!!


Goodnight SB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:22:38 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Grande"
Not sure about the lighthouse witness...

There are a few perculiar names on that new list, Rafael Solognier's being one of them.  The record indicates his car was searched, which raises all sorts of questions for me, none of which have been addressed.  

There are alot of entries on that list that need to be addressed in my opinion.

Grande
I agree 200%  who are some of these people...
Great Job on the spread sheet!!!
I just wonder wahtis missing ? That is to say it did not (?) relate the the Dr. Phil case.


The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


That entry is not quite clear, my apologies.  My point is that the majority of the significant and perhaps original Simian occur right after PVDS was interrogated by Clyde Burke until his next interrogation on June 29.  

I have not seen the IP information associated with the posts, however Klaas did confirm there were multiple associated with Simian, and were likely different persons.  Even without seeing the IP information I suspect the only legitimate Simian posts occurred between 6-24 and 6-29.  I will check that again however and post any revisions to that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:25:44 AM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Oh that's right.  I was trying to determine what that entry meant exactly.  I made it last week.   The 'posts of value' were made between the aforementioned timeframe if I am not mistaken.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Anna on June 04, 2007, 12:26:46 AM
Joran confesses (if you can call saying Deepak did it a confession), Deepak says all that on the Skeeters tape, their statements contradict each other, Deepak caught on tape saying Joran is gonna get fifteen years, pouring concrete that is left intact, Paulus sweating and taking phone calls during international TV interview. . . .

No matter what the evidence if it is circumstantial, they do nothing or a judge rules it doesn't count.

If forensics are all that count in Aruban court, those who failed to take them should be charged with criminal dereliction of duty or some sort.

But I am not sure at this point in time that even if a video of the actual crime were to surface that any action would be taken.

Guess that's why we are all still here, the mound of evidence is very high and yet nothing because it is not an actual body or DNA or whatever it is they want.

But that's the problem, no matter what the evidence might be, there is going to be nothing done and no prosecution I am afraid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 12:27:23 AM
Grande - let me look at the posts again, give me a bit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:28:05 AM
Grande
I know what you mean... about trying to remember stuff

Quote
Deepak  15.30
On your question if Joran and the girl had stepped from my car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea;
I will answer you no.

Satish 5/31/05 19:20
On your question if Joran and the girl had gotten out of the car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea;
I answer you no. Joran and the girl never got out of Deepak’s car.


Joran had to mention something about this  since he was interviewed 1st.
How many areas on Aruba are known as Fisherman's hut's?

Why did not the police ask more question on this ?  (Yes we know the answer)

G'nite gang


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:29:19 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Oh that's right.  I was trying to determine what that entry meant exactly.  I made it last week.   The 'posts of value' were made between the aforementioned timeframe if I am not mistaken.


Sorry for the confusion on this part.  I will address this first thing in the morning and revise the entry on the spreadsheet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Rob on June 04, 2007, 12:31:03 AM
Klaas, Grande, OF, Anna and Angie...and Tyler.. Good Nite Ladies and Gentlemen...

My pleasure as always.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:32:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Joran confesses (if you can call saying Deepak did it a confession), Deepak says all that on the Skeeters tape, their statements contradict each other, Deepak caught on tape saying Joran is gonna get fifteen years, pouring concrete that is left intact, Paulus sweating and taking phone calls during international TV interview. . . .

No matter what the evidence if it is circumstantial, they do nothing or a judge rules it doesn't count.

If forensics are all that count in Aruban court, those who failed to take them should be charged with criminal dereliction of duty or some sort.

But I am not sure at this point in time that even if a video of the actual crime were to surface that any action would be taken.

Guess that's why we are all still here, the mound of evidence is very high and yet nothing because it is not an actual body or DNA or whatever it is they want.

But that's the problem, no matter what the evidence might be, there is going to be nothing done and no prosecution I am afraid.


The concrete work was done by Eloi Fransisco Ruiz IMO, again based on the witness list.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: oldfart on June 04, 2007, 12:34:55 AM
:oops:
I forgot  my  normal signoff   &  besides I found a new Smiley waving bye  :wink:

SeeeYaaaByeeee   (http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c314/OldF/stinkyfart.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 04, 2007, 12:35:06 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Klaas, Grande, OF, Anna and Angie...and Tyler.. Good Nite Ladies and Gentlemen...

My pleasure as always.


Sweet dreams


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:35:48 AM
http://www.hi5.com/friend/21552751--Clyde--Profile-html

Take particular notice of his friends... PAUL SUETE.  Don't worry I won't go there tonight Klaas, lol.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: truthseeker2 on June 04, 2007, 12:36:48 AM
Gotta call it a night.  Hope to have time to lurk while I work tomorrow.  Lot's of interesting things to ponder tomorrow.

Thanks to Dana for having Hodges on your show tonight.  It really has us thinking!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:36:56 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Oh that's right.  I was trying to determine what that entry meant exactly.  I made it last week.   The 'posts of value' were made between the aforementioned timeframe if I am not mistaken.


Sorry for the confusion on this part.  I will address this first thing in the morning and revise the entry on the spreadsheet.


  GRANDE.. for some reason I canot open your spreadsheet?   :cry:
 I dont know if it has to do with this sucky ass Windows Vita or what? OR .. if  I need to download something to view it?
  Can you send me the link again. and perhaps  a suggetsion as to what I need to load to read it?  I think you have my email addy? If not,.. get if from Yap..or Carpe.. or Rob.... they have my permission. Or anyone else for that matter. THANK YOU.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:37:07 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Klaas, Grande, OF, Anna and Angie...and Tyler.. Good Nite Ladies and Gentlemen...

My pleasure as always.


G'nite Rob


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:37:43 AM
Quote from: "Rob"
Klaas, Grande, OF, Anna and Angie...and Tyler.. Good Nite Ladies and Gentlemen...

My pleasure as always.


 Night Robert.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:38:20 AM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Gotta call it a night.  Hope to have time to lurk while I work tomorrow.  Lot's of interesting things to ponder tomorrow.

Thanks to Dana for having Hodges on your show tonight.  It really has us thinking!!!


 Night to yah ~!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:41:00 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Oh that's right.  I was trying to determine what that entry meant exactly.  I made it last week.   The 'posts of value' were made between the aforementioned timeframe if I am not mistaken.


Sorry for the confusion on this part.  I will address this first thing in the morning and revise the entry on the spreadsheet.


  GRANDE.. for some reason I canot open your spreadsheet?   :cry:
 I dont know if it has to do with this sucky ass Windows Vita or what? OR .. if  I need to download something to view it?
  Can you send me the link again. and perhaps  a suggetsion as to what I need to load to read it?  I think you have my email addy? If not,.. get if from Yap..or Carpe.. or Rob.... they have my permission. Or anyone else for that matter. THANK YOU.


Angie, Oldfart and to whom else with a genuine concern;  My email addy is tdbweb2003@yahoo.com.  For those of you who will attempt to solicit other information with a disingenuine concern, consider yourself's warned, LOL.  Your identity WILL be revealed, very similar to how Simian revealed Shango's disingenuine, misguided concern / attempted manipulation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 04, 2007, 12:41:11 AM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Roy Tromp along with Clyde Burke interrogated Paulus Van der Sloot on June 18, 2005 and June 23, 2005.  Grande is there any reason why Roy Tromp has never been implicated as "Simian"?  Just wondering.

Janet

Roy Tromp
CBS NEWS
August 5, 2005


Tromp said investigators believe van der Sloot, who turns 18 on Saturday, is the prime suspect and that he had some assistance from his father, Paul, an apprentice judge on the island.

"We believe something went wrong with the girl, and the first person you are going to call is your daddy," said Tromp. "In this case, daddy would know exactly what to do."

Tromp, who declined to provide details about exactly what investigators believe happened to Holloway, said that Paul van der Sloot has also changed his account the night Holloway vanished.  "Why should you do that if you are telling the truth?" he said.


Roy Tromp
CDNN
June 30, 2005


The lead investigator, Lt. Roy Tromp, said he believes "that Joran is involved in the disappearance." He said the teen has offered 10 different versions of what happened the day Holloway disappeared.


Roy Tromp
CNN
August 2, 2005


Aruban authorities said Monday they were looking for a pair of size 14 tennis shoes that van der Sloot might have had on the night Holloway disappeared.

"He says he might have lost a pair of sneakers on the beach the night Natalee disappeared. That's what he claims in one of his many statements," lead police investigator Roy Tromp said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:46:42 AM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Roy Tromp along with Clyde Burke interrogated Paulus Van der Sloot on June 18, 2005 and June 23, 2005.  Grande is there any reason why Roy Tromp has never been implicated as "Simian"?  Just wondering.

Janet

Roy Tromp
CBS NEWS
August 5, 2005


Tromp said investigators believe van der Sloot, who turns 18 on Saturday, is the prime suspect and that he had some assistance from his father, Paul, an apprentice judge on the island.

"We believe something went wrong with the girl, and the first person you are going to call is your daddy," said Tromp. "In this case, daddy would know exactly what to do."

Tromp, who declined to provide details about exactly what investigators believe happened to Holloway, said that Paul van der Sloot has also changed his account the night Holloway vanished.  "Why should you do that if you are telling the truth?" he said.


Roy Tromp
CDNN
June 30, 2005


The lead investigator, Lt. Roy Tromp, said he believes "that Joran is involved in the disappearance." He said the teen has offered 10 different versions of what happened the day Holloway disappeared.


Roy Tromp
CNN
August 2, 2005


Aruban authorities said Monday they were looking for a pair of size 14 tennis shoes that van der Sloot might have had on the night Holloway disappeared.

"He says he might have lost a pair of sneakers on the beach the night Natalee disappeared. That's what he claims in one of his many statements," lead police investigator Roy Tromp said.


For one, Roy continued to play a role in the case, CLYDE Burke on the other hand did NOT.  That along with many other details lead me to that conclusion.  

Then again, it depends on WHICH Simian you are referring to.  I think it has been speculated many time over that Diandra Alders may have 'hijacked' the original Simian's handle.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:47:29 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Oh that's right.  I was trying to determine what that entry meant exactly.  I made it last week.   The 'posts of value' were made between the aforementioned timeframe if I am not mistaken.


Sorry for the confusion on this part.  I will address this first thing in the morning and revise the entry on the spreadsheet.


  GRANDE.. for some reason I canot open your spreadsheet?   :cry:
 I dont know if it has to do with this sucky ass Windows Vita or what? OR .. if  I need to download something to view it?
  Can you send me the link again. and perhaps  a suggetsion as to what I need to load to read it?  I think you have my email addy? If not,.. get if from Yap..or Carpe.. or Rob.... they have my permission. Or anyone else for that matter. THANK YOU.


Angie, Oldfart and to whom else with a genuine concern;  My email addy is tdbweb2003@yahoo.com.  For those of you who will attempt to solicit other information with a disingenuine concern, consider yourself's warned, LOL.  Your identity WILL be revealed, very similar to how Simian revealed Shango's disingenuine, misguided concern / attempted manipulation.

  TY and you got mail.... when you have time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:49:05 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Grande"

The spreadsheet is simply a result of my lack of memory.  All these details and so little memory capacity, lol.  

Here is one other significant detail I noted...

Simian's last post (Or one of the last) was at: June 28th, 2005 at 2:53 am-Simian posts begin shortly after Clyde Burke's 6-24 interrogation of Paulus van der Sloot and end shortly before his next interrogation on 6-29 (Clyde Burke appears to have been off for a week.)


Actually, Simian's first post was on June 17th ( right around the time the guy got his Columbian nectie) and were mostly posts trying to dispell the "sold into slavery" theory.  That would make sense if they were already pretty sure Joran and Co were the guilty parties.


Roy Tromp along with Clyde Burke interrogated Paulus Van der Sloot on June 18, 2005 and June 23, 2005.  Grande is there any reason why Roy Tromp has never been implicated as "Simian"?  Just wondering.

Janet

Roy Tromp
CBS NEWS
August 5, 2005


Tromp said investigators believe van der Sloot, who turns 18 on Saturday, is the prime suspect and that he had some assistance from his father, Paul, an apprentice judge on the island.

"We believe something went wrong with the girl, and the first person you are going to call is your daddy," said Tromp. "In this case, daddy would know exactly what to do."

Tromp, who declined to provide details about exactly what investigators believe happened to Holloway, said that Paul van der Sloot has also changed his account the night Holloway vanished.  "Why should you do that if you are telling the truth?" he said.


Roy Tromp
CDNN
June 30, 2005


The lead investigator, Lt. Roy Tromp, said he believes "that Joran is involved in the disappearance." He said the teen has offered 10 different versions of what happened the day Holloway disappeared.


Roy Tromp
CNN
August 2, 2005


Aruban authorities said Monday they were looking for a pair of size 14 tennis shoes that van der Sloot might have had on the night Holloway disappeared.

"He says he might have lost a pair of sneakers on the beach the night Natalee disappeared. That's what he claims in one of his many statements," lead police investigator Roy Tromp said.


For one, Roy continued to play a role in the case, CLYDE Burke on the other hand did NOT.  That along with many other details lead me to that conclusion.  

Then again, it depends on WHICH Simian you are referring to.  I think it has been speculated many time over that Diandra Alders may have 'hijacked' the original Simian's handle.


BUT, I would definately not rule Roy out or anyone else for that matter.  Clyde fits for me.  Fits the Simian post timeline like a K-Swiss, pardon the pun, JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 04, 2007, 12:49:43 AM
Grande ... what role does Roy Tromp still play in the Natalee Holloway case?  Is he still in law enforcement in Aruba?

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:50:47 AM
Sorry in advanced for all the typos, and grammatical errors!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 12:52:55 AM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Grande ... what role does Roy Tromp still play in the Natalee Holloway case?  Is he still in law enforcement in Aruba?

Janet


I suppose I should clarify... Role in relation to the suspect / witness statements as a(n) 'writer/initiator'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 12:55:46 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Sorry in advanced for all the typos, and grammatical errors!

 Just blame it on me.. everyone else does..  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 01:00:16 AM
Grande - the first verified post by Simian was on June 17th, the last was actually on July 1st but that was using the nickname Baboon.  He also used the nickname of Mano on June 30th a couple of times.  All of the other posts were using the nickname Simian.

I'm basing this on the same email address and location of the IP.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tamikosmom on June 04, 2007, 01:01:07 AM
Quote from: "Grande"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Grande ... what role does Roy Tromp still play in the Natalee Holloway case?  Is he still in law enforcement in Aruba?

Janet


I suppose I should clarify... Role in relation to the suspect / witness statements as a(n) 'writer/initiator'.


I will take you words to mean that Roy Tromp still hold a position withing the Aruban Law Enforcement.

Thank you Grande.

It was my understanding that Dennis Jacobs was the one who played an original role in any aspect of the Natalee Holloway investigation holding a position within the ALE or ... the prosector's office.  I guess I was mistaken.

Good Night Monkeys (10:00 PM)

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 01:04:40 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Grande"
Sorry in advanced for all the typos, and grammatical errors!

 Just blame it on me.. everyone else does..  :wink:


LOL.  

I will reply to your email in the AM.  I need to get some rest.  

Janet...
 
Rolando Tromp also seems to have played a much lesser 'role' as it relates to the statements, very similar to Clyde which could suggest he may have also been suspected of 'leacking' inside info.  Then again, I may be totally off base.  

I would be willing to bet on a leak via "Simian" from either Clyde or Roy, that based on the timing and accuracy of those posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on June 04, 2007, 01:04:51 AM
Night Janet. and Night to anyone left here!


Hugs to  NEMO and CP  !!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Grande on June 04, 2007, 01:06:13 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Grande - the first verified post by Simian was on June 17th, the last was actually on July 1st but that was using the nickname Baboon.  He also used the nickname of Mano on June 30th a couple of times.  All of the other posts were using the nickname Simian.

I'm basing this on the same email address and location of the IP.


That helps alot thank you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 01:06:41 AM
Nite Angie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Freebird on June 04, 2007, 01:08:02 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Easywriter"
There have been some real whack-o's attracted to this case and they have come up with some crazy, crazy stuff.  I don't understand this guy completely, but he didn't seem over the top crazy to me.


 I wanted to generate discussion by having Hodges on, i think that was established. The H&C interview was a joke, here I gave him a opportunity to speak, he admits himself this probably would never get to a court room.
Speculation maybe, there are facts there too.
I hope I never offended anyone by having him on.


Sorry Im so late joining this discussion which has probably moved on my now -- just wanted to say that I thought what the Dr said was chilling and definitely struck a chord that rings true.

For two years we have looked at statements and observed the suspects, and we all know of things they say or do that just dont make sense or they seem overly contrived or out of place.    You know there's something off about it but sometimes you just cant put your finger on it.   I think the Dr's comments give some context to those moments and help explain why they seem so out of sync.

Good show, Dana, good guest.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:15:41 AM
I agree with your theory, Freebird.  There are so many times they appeared to be going to say something pertinent and then change to another tack.
As though their mouths were working faster than their brains, and they have to stop and re=phrase so it throws the suspicion elsewhere.  Liars but not very good ones.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 04, 2007, 01:20:52 AM
H and C...they have always been good about getting "their" opinions across. So much for fair and balanced


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:34:03 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
H and C...they have always been good about getting "their" opinions across. So much for fair and balanced


Are you sure it is not meant to be unfair and unbalanced?   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:37:40 AM
It is like having a conversation with my DH   :lol:  :lol:
We need San back to bump these pages along or maybe Klaas is going to stay awake until we can get to unlocking the new cage.
It is a wonder Robots is not standing by to cheat again.
If they hurry up I will not have to sweep this cage.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: klaasend on June 04, 2007, 01:39:45 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
It is like having a conversation with my DH   :lol:  :lol:
We need San back to bump these pages along or maybe Klaas is going to stay awake until we can get to unlocking the new cage.
It is a wonder Robots is not standing by to cheat again.
If they hurry up I will not have to sweep this cage.   :wink:


I'll unlock the new cage in case you nightowls get to page 50.  You can move yourselves over and I'll lock this one in the morning.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:43:02 AM
Goodnight Klaas - we will all be good monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Shell on June 04, 2007, 01:45:41 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Goodnight Klaas - we will all be good monkeys


We are?..lol...g night you all, thank goodness for reasonable sane people


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:48:25 AM
Good night, Shell.  Nice to talk to you.

Some of us try to be good sometimes  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:49:55 AM
oops ....I think I posted in the new cage  :wink:  :wink:
Beat you, Robots   8)
You need to listen to more Norah Jones!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 01:54:28 AM
Note to Spooky
Thank you so much for that link to the Penguin Rock.
I have such fun watching the little cuties.
I have seen them at places like Sea World but it is good to be able to sit and watch their antics just when you feel like it.  Thank you again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 04, 2007, 01:59:15 AM
I'll help this thread along by saying goodnight.

Goodnight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: LilPuma on June 04, 2007, 02:33:29 AM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Grande
I know what you mean... about trying to remember stuff

Quote
Deepak  15.30
On your question if Joran and the girl had stepped from my car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea;
I will answer you no.

Satish 5/31/05 19:20
On your question if Joran and the girl had gotten out of the car at the Fisherman’s Huts and walked by the sea;
I answer you no. Joran and the girl never got out of Deepak’s car.


Joran had to mention something about this  since he was interviewed 1st.
How many areas on Aruba are known as Fisherman's hut's?

Why did not the police ask more question on this ?  (Yes we know the answer)

G'nite gang


There are fishermen's huts near the Lighthouse, I think.  I recall Arlene telling us they were open shelters, not closed with doors.  She was thinking of a different place, and I remember seeing pictures of what she was referring to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: crazybabyborg on June 04, 2007, 03:57:25 AM
I'm WAY back reading, but just had to jump forward to say that whoever took SandraK's hard drive will break their neck to return it once they get a load of the way she posts!!!

WELCOME DESTINY!!!!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 04, 2007, 07:16:22 AM
cbb~  :D

Good morning! And we are STILL on this thread?!  :shock:

See everyone later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: justinsmama on June 04, 2007, 07:16:58 AM
I'm sleepy and I don't wanna go to work!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 07:34:11 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
I agree with your theory, Freebird.  There are so many times they appeared to be going to say something pertinent and then change to another tack.
As though their mouths were working faster than their brains, and they have to stop and re=phrase so it throws the suspicion elsewhere.  Liars but not very good ones.


You can even see it happen when Joran has been interviewed in front of a camera.  His mouth is running off fast and steady, but he will catch himself, look away and then his eyes will shift from side to side as he invents his next story.  That guy is very transparent, yet he walks free....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 07:48:26 AM
Hey Easy - I believe you were looking for me the other day?  Something about Big Brother?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 07:53:23 AM
I woke up thought printing this morning!

Joran first said Deepak came back to the beach to pick him up and that Deepak said “fok die bitch.”  Later he changes his story and says Satish came to pick him up and Satish said, “fok die bitch.”  Two years later Joran gives a magazine interview and when asked how he felt about Natalee, he said, “fok die bitch!”  Do we need a “thought print” expert to decipher the meaning of those exchanges?  IMO, those have always been Joran’s words.  Who was he talking to when he first said those words as Natalee lay lifeless before their eyes?  I get an image of an isolated area, panic, at least one person wanting to help, or at least call for help and Joran telling them no “fok die bitch.”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 07:55:43 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Hey Easy - I believe you were looking for me the other day?  Something about Big Brother?


Yeah, in our news they say that show is causing a big stink downunder.  Where does that stand now.  Does the girl still not know her father is dead?  How are people reacting to that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: anidac on June 04, 2007, 08:00:16 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
I'm sleepy and I don't wanna go to work!



Ditto!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:03:44 AM
it rained here all weekend so I was lazier than I needed to be, but up and at it for work at 7:30 but I feel sure I'll be feeling a nappy for lunch  :lol:

Ya'll need to sneak over to the new thread or hurry up to get this one closed, to see a news article hotshot posted about Renfro  :roll: just make sure you don't have an empty stomach .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 08:03:49 AM
Joran spent 180 days in jail due to his never-ending change of stories.  The Kalpoes walked because they came up with one story and stuck with it until this day.

Where does the truth hide?  Did the Kalpoes leave Joran alone with Natalee at some point?  Why would they do that and then go back to get the guy a little later?  Not that many young guys would be that accommodating.  In fact, most would say to hell with you, walk home!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 08:06:00 AM
The girl still does not know anything as she is still in the house.  There has been a lot of bad press about it as just about anyone asked says they should tell her, and there has been a lot of letters to the newspapers and talk back radio.
At last weeks show where they release the competitor that has been voted out some people in the audience had placards saying "Christine - your dad is dead" hoping they would be seen during live crosses to the house.  But the security "bouncers" spotted them and marched them out of the studio.  Think there is another elimination tonight but have not heard anything yet.  Will keep you posted  :wink:
Have a good day - nearly time for bed over here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:08:38 AM
Easy,

It's my experience that most of the really bad stuff teen men get into is in a group, I've always felt that the group or gang element was a catalyst that night as well as any video filming that may have occurred. Deepak and Satish aren't innocent and they may have willingly followed Joran's orders and demands, but from the moment Natalee was drugged and driven away honestly that did constitute kidnapping and I believe K2 had their turn with her also sexually.

I don't think there was any thrill in it without Joran feeling he was the orchestrator and the master, get it, Fok die bitch?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 08:10:33 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
it rained here all weekend so I was lazier than I needed to be, but up and at it for work at 7:30 but I feel sure I'll be feeling a nappy for lunch  :lol:

Ya'll need to sneak over to the new thread or hurry up to get this one closed, to see a news article hotshot posted about Renfro  :roll: just make sure you don't have an empty stomach .


Hi None - yes I have read it and it really makes you angry.  Firstly they have got the story wrong even after all this time, and then all the lies about Renfro.  I guess we know what Klaas will print when she reads it ?
And what about the statement where the MB kids last saw Natalee lying on the bar?  I am speechless.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:18:02 AM
Tib-

As much as i hate to write this, I have been to Aruba and I didn't experience some big happy place. I have places like Antigua and st John's that do seem very happy spots, and I also made my first trip to the Caribbean at age 16 with my family. I've been over a span of years about 15 different trips and my feeling about Aruba was how money-grabbing they were. I didn't feel we had top drawer hotel service, everyone had their hand out in your face (1998) and the shop keepers on the whole were just the same, either buy something or get out of my shop.

So I expect people like that to lie, or people who are rumored to run escort services to lie, or governors who willingly get in bed with Chavez to lie. Jossy now appears to be one of the few there who has a conscience and standards, so it must be a lonely pursuit trying to care for his homeland.

At this point nothing they do surprises me, except I am surprised that Jossy is there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 08:18:53 AM
oops - Easy, the girl's name is Emma.  I have no idea where I got Christine from  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 08:19:22 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Easy,

It's my experience that most of the really bad stuff teen men get into is in a group, I've always felt that the group or gang element was a catalyst that night as well as any video filming that may have occurred. Deepak and Satish aren't innocent and they may have willingly followed Joran's orders and demands, but from the moment Natalee was drugged and driven away honestly that did constitute kidnapping and I believe K2 had their turn with her also sexually.

I don't think there was any thrill in it without Joran feeling he was the orchestrator and the master, get it, Fok die bitch?


I agree that at least those three were involved in what happened to Natalee, but when did they part company?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 08:23:49 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
oops - Easy, the girl's name is Emma.  I have no idea where I got Christine from  :roll:


Do you think the story is on the up-and-up, or is it a ploy to boost ratings?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:24:12 AM
Easy do you mean when did they no longer remain friends or are you asking if K2 were involved in her death?

see I've always thought Deepak's comments "wait until they see that shit" and "your own father" were both indicators he was there when she died. I also think Satish's fragile state while at the KIA was another indicator.

but.........I am no expert here, just one more opinion which we know those are quite prevalent  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:30:17 AM
hey Bean-

I see you out there, where you been bean? I miss you !!

well since I"m the only person on my virtual team who is online STILL atthis late hour of 8:30am then I'm going to walk outside since the sun is shining and finish my coffee on my porch.  :lol:

later taters !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 08:30:39 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Easy do you mean when did they no longer remain friends or are you asking if K2 were involved in her death?

see I've always thought Deepak's comments "wait until they see that shit" and "your own father" were both indicators he was there when she died. I also think Satish's fragile state while at the KIA was another indicator.

but.........I am no expert here, just one more opinion which we know those are quite prevalent  :lol:


I think they were involved in a sexual assault against Natalee.  But, at some point the brothers left and went home.  When?

I'm mostly just thinking out loud.  If I have time, I am going to read through the PV's again today and refresh my memory about some of the BS all these guys have told.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 08:33:19 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Tib-

As much as i hate to write this, I have been to Aruba and I didn't experience some big happy place. I have places like Antigua and st John's that do seem very happy spots, and I also made my first trip to the Caribbean at age 16 with my family. I've been over a span of years about 15 different trips and my feeling about Aruba was how money-grabbing they were. I didn't feel we had top drawer hotel service, everyone had their hand out in your face (1998) and the shop keepers on the whole were just the same, either buy something or get out of my shop.

So I expect people like that to lie, or people who are rumored to run escort services to lie, or governors who willingly get in bed with Chavez to lie. Jossy now appears to be one of the few there who has a conscience and standards, so it must be a lonely pursuit trying to care for his homeland.

At this point nothing they do surprises me, except I am surprised that Jossy is there.


I understand what you are saying with their attitude to tourists.  We had the same treatment travelling in Indonesia.  Hands out everywhere, even little children chasing after you for money.  Market stall holders would rush out and physically drag you into their little huts to buy something.  When you said no they could not get you out of there fast enough.  Everything was money, money, money.  They kept telling us Australians were rich because we could afford a holiday.  As you would realise  we saved for quite a while for the holiday but I suppose our way of life must seem glamorous to them although it is everyday living to us.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:35:38 AM
Easy,

sheesh I always sign off just when people answer me  :lol: have you ever wondered if Paulus was who sent them away? I have. Even if this didn't go down at the VDS home, Joran calls daddy and he says "do this" and either the K2 don't want to or daddy-o says "get rid of them because we don't want any witnesses".

I really don't think K2 disposed of her body to it's ultimate location but now I think they are realizing even if they didn't, they are taking the wrap for it. That makes me smile to know that, I hope K2 has lots of bad dreams forever until one of them fesses up


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 08:36:49 AM
Quote from: "Easywriter"
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
oops - Easy, the girl's name is Emma.  I have no idea where I got Christine from  :roll:


Do you think the story is on the up-and-up, or is it a ploy to boost ratings?


That is a good question.  It appears to be correct according to the news reports, but we all know what publicity hounds can do with a good story.  I just hope that if it is true the BB powers that be handle it with some sort of sensitivity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:38:26 AM
Quote from: "Tibrogargan"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Tib-

As much as i hate to write this, I have been to Aruba and I didn't experience some big happy place. I have places like Antigua and st John's that do seem very happy spots, and I also made my first trip to the Caribbean at age 16 with my family. I've been over a span of years about 15 different trips and my feeling about Aruba was how money-grabbing they were. I didn't feel we had top drawer hotel service, everyone had their hand out in your face (1998) and the shop keepers on the whole were just the same, either buy something or get out of my shop.

So I expect people like that to lie, or people who are rumored to run escort services to lie, or governors who willingly get in bed with Chavez to lie. Jossy now appears to be one of the few there who has a conscience and standards, so it must be a lonely pursuit trying to care for his homeland.

At this point nothing they do surprises me, except I am surprised that Jossy is there.


I understand what you are saying with their attitude to tourists.  We had the same treatment travelling in Indonesia.  Hands out everywhere, even little children chasing after you for money.  Market stall holders would rush out and physically drag you into their little huts to buy something.  When you said no they could not get you out of there fast enough.  Everything was money, money, money.  They kept telling us Australians were rich because we could afford a holiday.  As you would realise  we saved for quite a while for the holiday but I suppose our way of life must seem glamorous to them although it is everyday living to us.


Tib thank you for that response, I agree with all of what you said. I would never go back to Aruba for that very reason even before this happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: nonesuche on June 04, 2007, 08:40:38 AM
oh Easy I meant to applaud you for that photo yesterday of the rat attorney  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: that was priceless, along with the bottle of pepto at his fingertips  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tibrogargan on June 04, 2007, 08:50:39 AM
For Easy :

Monday Jun 4 22:48 AEST
'Inhumane' Big Brother won't budge on dead father

A decision by the makers of Big Brother to not tell a contestant her father has died has been widely condemned as inhumane, unethical, and psychologically damaging. (AAP)

By Hal Crawford
ninemsn

A decision by the makers of Big Brother to not tell a contestant her father has died has been condemned as inhumane, unethical and psychologically damaging.

Contestant Emma's father Raymond Cornell died last week and his funeral was held on Monday in Adelaide, but the 24-year-old is still unaware of his death.

"Will they break the news to her on air, for ratings?" World Vision chief Tim Costello said. "This is patent ethical irresponsibility . . . she's only got one father and she'll suffer guilt and possibly resentment for the rest of her life."

Producers of Big Brother have refused to move from their position, stating that "it was the wish of the family" that Mr Cornell's death be kept from Emma.

But ethicists say such a decision cannot be made for Emma, regardless of what her family or even her father wanted.

"Parents often want to protect children, but she's an adult and she can make up her own mind," media commentator and academic Eva Cox said. "She has to be told."

Rev Costello and Ms Cox called for the establishment of constraints on reality shows like Big Brother.

"Shows like this encourage the most prurient side of our natures," Ms Cox said "This is a serious question, and here we've crossed the line."

"It really is getting too much like the 'real' Big Brother," Rev Costello said. "The boundaries keep getting pushed back and we don't notice — like the frog in a pot of slowly heating water."

The fact that Emma had been estranged until recently from her father, who was sick with cancer before his daughter entered the Gold Coast Big Brother house, only made her ignorance more damaging.

"The funeral is the only rite of passage we have," Rev Costello said. "I don't think we can contract to do away with things like this."

Big Brother producers refused to comment in detail on the criticisms.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 04, 2007, 08:50:41 AM
EASY:  Joran spent 180 days in jail due to his never-ending change of stories. The Kalpoes walked because they came up with one story and stuck with it until this day.

Where does the truth hide? Did the Kalpoes leave Joran alone with Natalee at some point? Why would they do that and then go back to get the guy a little later? Not that many young guys would be that accommodating. In fact, most would say to hell with you, walk home!
*********************

I don't know about the 180 days spent in jail.  When was that?  I thought he was arrested the second week in June and got out last week in August, a total of about 80 days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 08:53:17 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
EASY:  Joran spent 180 days in jail due to his never-ending change of stories. The Kalpoes walked because they came up with one story and stuck with it until this day.

Where does the truth hide? Did the Kalpoes leave Joran alone with Natalee at some point? Why would they do that and then go back to get the guy a little later? Not that many young guys would be that accommodating. In fact, most would say to hell with you, walk home!
*********************

I don't know about the 180 days spent in jail.  When was that?  I thought he was arrested the second week in June and got out last week in August, a total of about 80 days.


My bad!  180 stuck in my mind for some reason.  Probably related to some other happening.  Point was Joran spent a long time in jail and the Kalpoes were let go.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 04, 2007, 08:55:40 AM
Easy, I think anything short of a manslaughter charge for him is too little and probably now too late.  I would like to see him do time in a real prison where his mommy and daddy were not visiting and his father's buddies calling the shots, possibly taking Joran out at night to visit his parents while they were living with him.  Ben King could have and probably did that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Tylergal on June 04, 2007, 08:58:50 AM
Did they take Satish home to provide an alibi while Joran "stayed with the girl" to ensure nobody came along and Deepak was off to render help from Paulus and his underworld thugs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #633 6/2 - 6/3/2007
Post by: Easywriter on June 04, 2007, 09:15:52 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Did they take Satish home to provide an alibi while Joran "stayed with the girl" to ensure nobody came along and Deepak was off to render help from Paulus and his underworld thugs.


That makes sense.  Joran stays at the beach with Natalee and the brothers go to get help, tools, or others to help.  Where did the "came back with two dawgs" story come from?